Page last updated: 2024-12-06

irinotecan

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID60838
CHEMBL ID481
CHEBI ID80630
SCHEMBL ID4034
MeSH IDM0147530

Synonyms (87)

Synonym
AB00698464-10
BRD-K08547377-003-02-4
irinotecan mylan
hsdb 7607
irinotecanum
nsc 728073
irinophore c
unii-7673326042
NCI60_005051
(1,4'-bipiperidine)-1'-carboxylic acid, 4,11-diethyl-3,4,12-14-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-1h-pyrano(3',4':6,7)indolizino(1,2-b)quinolin-9-yl ester, (s)-
irinotecan [inn:ban]
irinotecanum [inn-latin]
(4s)-4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-3,4,12,14-tetrahydro-1h-pyrano[3',4':6,7]indolizino[1,2-b]quinolin-9-yl 1,4'-bipiperidine-1'-carboxylate
BSPBIO_002346
(4s)-4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-4,12-dihydro-1h-pyrano[3,4-f]quinolino[2,3-a]indolizin-9-yl 4-piperidylpiperidinecarboxylate
(diethyl-hydroxy-dioxo-[?]yl) 4-(1-piperidyl)piperidine-1-carboxylate
irinotecan ,
DB00762
1U65
irinotecan lactone
(+)-irinotecan
97682-44-5
nsc728073
nsc-728073
irrinotecan
AC-7469
(4s)-4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-3,4,12,14-tetrahydro-1h-pyrano[3'',4'':6,7]indolizino[1,2-b]quinolin-9-yl 1,4''-bipiperidine-1''-carboxylate
bdbm50128267
[1,4'']bipiperidinyl-1''-carboxylic acid 4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-3,13-dioxo-3,4,12,13-tetrahydro-1h-2-oxa-6,12a-diaza-dibenzo[b,h]fluoren-9-yl ester
[1,4'']bipiperidinyl-1''-carboxylic acid (s)-4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-3,13-dioxo-3,4,12,13-tetrahydro-1h-2-oxa-6,12a-diaza-dibenzo[b,h]fluoren-9-yl ester
chebi:80630 ,
CHEMBL481 ,
biotecan
2-methoxy-5-[2-(3-sulfophenyl)-5-(4-sulfophenyl)pyrylium-4-yl]benzenesulfonic acid
irinotecan (inn)
biotecan (tn)
D08086
A845740
1,4'-bipiperidine-1'-carboxylic acid (s)-4,11-diethyl-3,4,12,14- tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-1h-pyrano[3',4':6,7]indolizino[1,2-b]quinolin-9-yl ester
NCGC00178697-02
BCP9000793
HY-16562
CS-1138
NCGC00178697-05
AB07527
irinotecan [inn]
irinotecan [vandf]
irinotecan [hsdb]
irinotecan [who-dd]
irinotecan [mi]
S1198
AKOS015894969
gtpl6823
UWKQSNNFCGGAFS-XIFFEERXSA-N
AB00698464-07
SCHEMBL4034
AB00698464-11
AB00698464-09
(4s)-4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-3,4,12,14-tetrahydro-1h-pyrano[3',4':6,7]indolizino[1,2-b]quinolin-9-yl [1,4'-bipiperidine]-1'-carboxylate
(s)-4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-3,4,12,14-tetrahydro-1h-pyrano[3',4':6,7]indolizino[1,2-b]quinolin-9-yl [1,4'-bipiperidine]-1'-carboxylate
AB00698464_13
AB00698464_12
AB00698464_14
cpt-11 hydrochloride;camptothecin 11 hydrochloride
DTXSID1041051 ,
(19s)-10,19-diethyl-19-hydroxy-14,18-dioxo-17-oxa-3,13-diazapentacyclo[11.8.0.0^{2,11}.0^{4,9}.0^{15,20}]henicosa-1(21),2(11),3,5,7,9,15(20)-heptaen-7-yl 4-(piperidin-1-yl)piperidine-1-carboxylate
irinotecan; cpt-11
Q412197
AS-14323
BCP02860
3-tert-butoxycarbonylamino-5-(4-fluorophenyl)thiophene-2-carboxylicacid
(s)-4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-3,4,12,14-tetrahydro-1h-pyrano[3',4':6,7]indolizino[1,2-b]quinolin-9-yl[1,4'-bipiperidine]-1'-carboxylate
irinotecan free base
97682-44-5 (free base)
AMY4227
1,4'-bipiperidine-1'-carboxylic acid (s)-4,11-diethyl-3,4,12,14- tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-1h-pyrano(3',4':6,7)indolizino(1,2-b)quinolin-9-yl ester
(1,4'-bipiperidine)-1'-carboxylic acid, (4s)-4,11-diethyl-3,4,12,14-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-1h-pyrano(3',4':6,7)indolizino(1,2-b)quinolin-9-yl ester
[(19s)-10,19-diethyl-19-hydroxy-14,18-dioxo-17-oxa-3,13-diazapentacyclo[11.8.0.02,11.04,9.015,20]henicosa-1(21),2,4(9),5,7,10,15(20)-heptaen-7-yl] 4-piperidin-1-ylpiperidine-1-carboxylate
(19s)-10,19-diethyl-19-hydroxy-14,18-dioxo-17-oxa-3,13-diazapentacyclo[11.8.0.0^{2,11}.0^{4,9}.0^{15,20}]henicosa-1(21),2(11),3,5,7,9,15(20)-heptaen-7-yl [1,4'-bipiperidine]-1'-carboxylate
EN300-708800
l01xx19
irinotecanum (inn-latin)
(+)-7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecine 10-(1,4'-bipiperidine)-1'-carboxylate
(4s)-4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-3,4,12,14-tetrahydro-1h-pyrano(3',4':6,7)indolizino(1,2-b)quinolin-9-yl (1,4'-bipiperidine)-1'-carboxylate
(1,4'-bipiperidine)-1'-carboxylic acid (s)-4,11-diethyl-3,4,12,14-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-3,14-dioxo-1h-pyrano(3',4':6,7)indolizino(1,2-b)quinolin-9-yl ester
(+)-(4s)-4,11-diethyl-4-hydroxy-9-((4-piperidino-piperidino)carbonyloxy)-1h-pyrano(3',4':6,7)indolizino(1,2-b)quinol-3,14,(4h,12h)-dione
dtxcid9021051

Research Excerpts

Overview

Irinotecan (IR/CPT-11) is a semisynthetic, water-soluble derivative of the alkaloid camptothecin. It is a topoisomerase inhibitor, widely used in treatment of malignancies including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Irinotecan is a cytotoxic agent that is widely used in the treatment of several types of solid tumors. "( Elucidating the role of pharmacogenetics in irinotecan efficacy and adverse events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Páez, D; Riera, P, 2021
)
2.33
"Irinotecan (IRN) is a semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin that acts as a topoisomerase I inhibitor. "( pH-responsive and folate-coated liposomes encapsulating irinotecan as an alternative to improve efficacy of colorectal cancer treatment.
Branco de Barros, AL; Cassali, GD; de Aguiar Ferreira, C; de Alcântara Lemos, J; de Oliveira Silva, J; Fernandes, RS; Miranda, SEM; Nunes, SS; Oliveira, MC; Townsend, DM, 2021
)
2.31
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a camptothecin chemotherapy drug largely used in treating cancers. "( Selenium-enriched Bifidobacterium longum DD98 attenuates irinotecan-induced intestinal and hepatic toxicity in vitro and in vivo.
Chen, D; Gao, F; Kan, S; Lu, C; Qian, Z; Yin, Y; Zhu, H, 2021
)
2.31
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anticancer agent widely used to treat adult solid tumours. "( Integration of DNA sequencing with population pharmacokinetics to improve the prediction of irinotecan exposure in cancer patients.
Bies, RR; Cecchin, E; Cox, NJ; Etheridge, AS; Forrest, A; Innocenti, F; Karas, S; Mathijssen, RHJ; Mohlke, KL; Nickerson, DA; Toffoli, G, 2022
)
2.38
"Irinotecan is an anticancer agent widely used for the treatment of solid tumors, including colorectal and pancreatic cancers. "( All You Need to Know About
Innocenti, F; Karas, S, 2022
)
2.16
"Irinotecan (IR/CPT-11) is a semisynthetic, water-soluble derivative of the alkaloid camptothecin. "( Curcumin protects against testis-specific side effects of irinotecan.
Aydın, M; Başak, N; Çetin, A; Çiftci, O; Gökhan Turtay, M; Gürbüz, Ş; Oğuztürk, H; Uyanık, Ö; Yücel, N, 2021
)
2.31
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase inhibitor, widely used in treatment of malignancies including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) as part of the FOLFIRINOX regimen prescribed as a first-line treatment in several countries. "( Liposomal irinotecan (Onivyde): Exemplifying the benefits of nanotherapeutic drugs.
Innocenti, F; Milano, G; Minami, H, 2022
)
2.57
"Irinotecan (Iri) is a key drug to treat metastatic colorectal cancer, but its clinical activity is often limited by de novo and acquired drug resistance. "( Single cell mass spectrometry studies reveal metabolomic features and potential mechanisms of drug-resistant cancer cell lines.
Chen, X; Sun, M; Yang, Z, 2022
)
2.16
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a camptothecin derivative whose potent anti-tumor activity depends on the rapid formation of an in vivo active metabolite, SN38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin). "( A novel irinotecan derivative ZBH-1207 with different anti-tumor mechanism from CPT-11 against colon cancer cells.
Li, Y; Shi, W; Wu, D; Yu, H; Zhang, G; Zhao, D; Zhong, B, 2022
)
2.6
"Irinotecan is a useful anticancer drug for colorectal cancer treatment. "( Association between a single nucleotide polymorphism in the R3HCC1 gene and irinotecan toxicity.
Hamamoto, Y; Hazama, S; Iida, M; Ioka, T; Kanesada, K; Matsui, H; Nagano, H; Ogihara, H; Shindo, Y; Suzuki, N; Takeda, S; Tokumitsu, Y; Tsunedomi, R; Yoshida, S, 2023
)
2.58
"Irinotecan (IRI) is a common chemotherapeutic drug for colorectal cancer; however, the mechanism underlying its immunomodulatory effect remains unclear. "( Curcumin Suppresses the Progression of Colorectal Cancer by Improving Immunogenic Cell Death Caused by Irinotecan.
Fang, Z; Gao, F; Peng, L; Peng, W; Song, F; Zhu, C, 2022
)
2.38
"Irinotecan is a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat a variety of tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC). "( Irinotecan-gut microbiota interactions and the capability of probiotics to mitigate Irinotecan-associated toxicity.
Ahmed, KA; Aidy, SE; Azmy, AF; Dishisha, T; El-Gendy, AO; Hassan, A; Mahdy, MS; Mohamed, WR, 2023
)
3.8
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anticancer drug with indications for use in treating various cancers, but severe diarrhea develops as a side effect. "( Green tea extract prevents CPT-11-induced diarrhea by regulating the gut microbiota.
Fukuda, M; Hosoe, T; Ikarashi, N; Kamei, J; Kon, R; Miyaoka, K; Noguchi, H; Sakai, H; Teshima, Y; Tomimoto, R; Yamaguchi, A; Yamaguchi, T, 2023
)
2.35
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor which has been widely used to combat several solid tumors, whereas irinotecan therapy can induce liver injury. "( Contribution of HIF-1α/BNIP3-mediated autophagy to lipid accumulation during irinotecan-induced liver injury.
Shi, C; Wang, Z; Xu, R; Zhang, Y; Zhang, Z, 2023
)
2.58
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that was approved for cancer treatment in 1994. "( Artesunate ameliorates irinotecan-induced intestinal injury by suppressing cellular senescence and significantly enhances anti-tumor activity.
Dai, QL; Jia, HJ; Rui Bai, S; Wang, XB; Xia, J; Yue He, S; Zhou, M, 2023
)
2.66
"Irinotecan (SN-38) is a potent and broad-spectrum anticancer drug that targets DNA topoisomerase I (Top1). "( Resistance to TOP-1 Inhibitors: Good Old Drugs Still Can Surprise Us.
Kumar, S; Sherman, MY, 2023
)
2.35
"Irinotecan is a major chemotherapeutic agent used for SCLC."( Phase II study of IRInotecan treatment after COmbined chemo-immunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Protocol of IRICO study.
Akagi, K; Dotsu, Y; Fukuda, M; Gyotoku, H; Hayashi, F; Hisamatsu, Y; Ikeda, T; Kinoshita, A; Morinaga, R; Mukae, H; Nagashima, S; Nakatomi, K; Ogata, R; Ono, S; Senju, H; Shimada, M; Soda, H; Sugasaki, N; Tagawa, R; Takemoto, S; Taniguchi, H; Tomono, H; Umeyama, Y, 2023
)
1.97
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anti-tumor drug and formulated as nanomedicines to reduce side effects and improve efficacy. "( Excipient-free nanodispersion of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin exerts potent therapeutic effects against pancreatic cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts.
Ding, Y; Du, R; Ge, W; Hu, S; Huang, Y; Kong, Y; Shen, Y; Wang, W; Xu, H; Yan, Y; Zhang, L; Zheng, H; Zhou, J; Zhou, Q; Zhou, X, 2019
)
1.96
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a cytotoxic drug that has wide applicability and usage in cancer treatment. "( Identify old drugs as selective bacterial β-GUS inhibitors by structural-based virtual screening and bio-evaluations.
Chang, S; Chen, Z; Kong, R; Liu, J; Piao, L; Xu, X, 2020
)
2
"Irinotecan is a chemotherapeutic drug used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer and elevated blood concentrations of its active metabolite, SN-38 leads to increased gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and diarrhea in patients. "( Effects of inflammation on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and development of a best-fit PK model.
Chityala, PK; Chow, DS; Ghose, R; Wu, L, 2020
)
2.3
"Irinotecan (Ir) is a potent antitumor chemotherapeutics in clinic and used for the treatment of a various cancers, but the degree of its application is critically limited by toxic side-effects and marked heterogeneities. "( Vitamin E-based prodrug self-delivery for nanoformulated irinotecan with synergistic antitumor therapeutics.
Hu, Y; Ismail, M; Li, B; Ling, L; Shang, Z, 2020
)
2.25
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anticancer agent widely used in the treatment of a variety of adult solid tumors. "( Optimal Sampling Strategies for Irinotecan (CPT-11) and its Active Metabolite (SN-38) in Cancer Patients.
Bies, RR; Cecchin, E; Etheridge, AS; Forrest, A; Innocenti, F; Karas, S; Mathijssen, RHJ; Ramírez, J; Ratain, MJ; Toffoli, G; Tsakalozou, E; van Schaik, RHN, 2020
)
2.28
"Irinotecan is a novel anticancer drug that has worked wonders in combination with other anticancer drugs. "( Irinotecan inducing sinus pause bradycardia in a patient with small round cell cancer.
Ambreen, S; Denha, EJ; Lohia, P; Mir, TA; Rahim, A; Shaikhli, RA; Yassin, AS, 2020
)
3.44
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a valuable chemotherapeutic compound, but its use is associated with severe diarrhea in some patients. "( Identification of the bioactive components of Banxia Xiexin Decoction that protect against CPT-11-induced intestinal toxicity via UPLC-based spectrum-effect relationship analyses.
Chang, XY; Dong, L; Jiang, ZP; Jin, WY; Li, ZZ; Shi, JW; Shi, Y; Sun, H; Wu, JS, 2021
)
2.06
"Irinotecan (IRI) is a potent antitumor chemotherapeutic in clinical practice and has been used for treating various malignant tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC)."( Combinatorial miRNA-34a replenishment and irinotecan delivery
Cui, X; Deng, X; Jia, F; Li, Y; Lu, J; Pan, Z; Shao, L; Wang, X; Wu, Y, 2020
)
1.54
"Irinotecan is an anticancer drug for which significant benefits from personalised dosing are expected. "( A simple, rapid and low-cost spectrophotometric method for irinotecan quantification in human plasma and in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Argyropoulou, A; Gkotzamani, P; Karkalousos, P; Petro, V; Tsotsou, GE, 2021
)
2.31
"Irinotecan is an important first- and second-line chemotherapy option for mCRC."( Optimum patient selection for irinotecan-containing regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: Literature review and lessons from clinical practice.
Basade, M; Mane, A,
)
1.14
"Irinotecan (CPT11) is an important drug for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) chemotherapy (CTx). "( UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphisms in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Irinotecan-Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy and Their Association with Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Overall Survival.
Bandyopadhyay, A; Behera, D; Sharma, S; Singh, N, 2021
)
2.29
"Irinotecan is a widely intravenously used drug for the treatment of certain types of solid tumours. "( Possible roles of intestinal P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A on the limited oral absorption of irinotecan.
Arimori, K; Furuya, Y; Hidaka, M; Kawano, Y; Ono, H; Yamasaki, K, 2021
)
2.28
"Irinotecan is a kind of alkaloid with antitumour activity, but its low solubility and high toxicity limit its application. "( EGCG synergizes the therapeutic effect of irinotecan through enhanced DNA damage in human colorectal cancer cells.
Chen, D; Chen, L; Dong, J; Geng, R; Gou, H; Liu, J; Ren, S; Wu, W; Xiang, B; Yang, X; Zhang, Z, 2021
)
2.33
"Irinotecan (IRN) is a highly effective chemotherapeutic drug against various types of cancer including colon cancer along with its analogous dose-limiting side effects viz."( Green tea catechins in combination with irinotecan attenuates tumorigenesis and treatment-associated toxicity in an inflammation-associated colon cancer mice model.
Bharali, MK; Borah, G, 2021
)
1.61
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an important drug used in the treatment of several solid tumor types. "( Development of an LC-MS/MS Method for Measurement of Irinotecan and Its Major Metabolites in Plasma: Technical Considerations.
Aoullay, Z; Cherrah, Y; Lynch, KL; Meddah, B; Van Wijk, XMR; Wu, AHB; Yanhui, M, 2022
)
2.41
"Irinotecan is a natural alkaloid agent widely used in cancer therapy. "( Effect of irinotecan on HMGB1, MMP9 expression, cell cycle, and cell growth in breast cancer (MCF-7) cells.
Keyvani-Ghamsari, S; Rabbani-Chadegani, A; Sargolzaei, J; Shahhoseini, M, 2017
)
2.3
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an effective chemotherapeutic agent widely used to treat different cancers. "( Improved selectivity and cytotoxic effects of irinotecan via liposomal delivery: A comparative study on Hs68 and HeLa cells.
Acedo, P; Cañete, M; Casadó, A; Mora, M; Rello-Varona, S; Sagristá, ML; Stockert, JC; Villanueva, A, 2017
)
2.16
"Irinotecan is a prodrug and is often prescribed as part of therapeutic regimes for patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Evaluation of Therapeutics in Colorectal Tumor Organoids.
Flinders, C; Hummon, AB; Liu, X; Mumenthaler, SM, 2018
)
1.2
"Irinotecan (IRI) is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug, mostly used for first-line treatment of colorectal and pancreatic cancer. "( Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Markers of Irinotecan Toxicity.
Antunes, MV; Hahn, RZ; Linden, R; Perassolo, MS; Schwartsmann, G; Suyenaga, ES; Verza, SG, 2019
)
2.21
"Irinotecan is a key chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of colorectal (CRC) and pancreatic (PDAC) cancer. "( Improved Efficacy and Reduced Toxicity Using a Custom-Designed Irinotecan-Delivering Silicasome for Orthotopic Colon Cancer.
Chan, R; Chang, CH; Ji, Y; Jiang, J; Liao, YP; Lin, J; Lin, P; Liu, X; Lu, J; Meng, H; Nel, AE; Okene, M; Qiu, W; Tang, I; Wainberg, ZA; Wang, X; Zheng, E, 2019
)
2.2
"Irinotecan is a camptothecin analog used worldwide for a broad range of solid tumors, including colorectal cancer. "( The risk of adverse events of CPT- 11.
Ichikawa, W; Imataka, H; Sekikawa, T, 2016
)
1.88
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a drug used against a wide range of tumor types. "( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its metabolites in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aldaz, A; Insausti, A; Oyaga-Iriarte, E; Sayar, O, 2019
)
2.23
"Irinotecan is an anticancer drug with a broad spectrum of activity, characterized by multistep and complex pharmacology. "( Intestinal bacterial β-glucuronidase as a possible predictive biomarker of irinotecan-induced diarrhea severity.
Armand, JP; Chamseddine, AN; Ducreux, M; Mir, O; Paci, A; Paoletti, X; Satar, T, 2019
)
2.19
"Irinotecan (CPT‑11) is a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor which is widely used in clinical chemotherapy, particularly for colorectal cancer treatment. "( Protective effect of curcumin against irinotecan‑induced intestinal mucosal injury via attenuation of NF‑κB activation, oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress.
Lu, Y; Luo, Z; Ouyang, M; Wu, J; Yao, X; Zhang, W; Zhu, D, 2019
)
2.23
"Irinotecan is a strong anticancer drug whose mechanism of action has been reported only for the inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I (Topo I) through its active metabolite SN-38. "( A novel mechanism of irinotecan targeting MDM2 and Bcl-xL.
Chi, SW; Lee, B; Lee, SO; Min, JA; Nashed, A; Yi, GS; Yoo, JC, 2019
)
2.28
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a drug used against a wide variety of tumors, which can cause severe toxicity, possibly leading to the delay or suspension of the cycle, with the consequent impact on the prognosis of survival. "( Prediction of irinotecan toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients based on machine learning models with pharmacokinetic parameters.
Aldaz, A; Insausti, A; Oyaga-Iriarte, E; Sayar, O, 2019
)
2.32
"Irinotecan is a major anticancer agent specifically targeting DNA topoisomerase I. "( Acquired irinotecan resistance is accompanied by stable modifications of cell cycle dynamics independent of MSI status.
Bastian, G; Escargueil, AE; Guérin, E; Larsen, AK; Ouaret, D; Petitprez, A; Poindessous, V; Regairaz, M, 2013
)
2.25
"Irinotecan is a semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin that exerts potent antitumor activity by inhibiting topoisomerase I. "( Synthesis, metabolite analysis, and in vivo evaluation of [(11)C]irinotecan as a novel positron emission tomography (PET) probe.
Fujinaga, M; Hashimoto, H; Hatori, A; Kawamura, K; Kumata, K; Ogawa, M; Wakizaka, H; Xie, L; Yamasaki, T; Yui, J; Zhang, MR, 2013
)
2.07
"Irinotecan is a powerful anticancer drug with severe systemic side effects that limit its clinical application. "( Irinotecan delivery by microbubble-assisted ultrasound: in vitro validation and a pilot preclinical study.
Bouakaz, A; Escoffre, JM; Lecomte, T; Novell, A; Serrière, S, 2013
)
3.28
"Irinotecan is a camptothecin derivative with low oral bioavailability due to active efflux by intestinal P-glycoprotein receptors. "( Nano scale self-emulsifying oil based carrier system for improved oral bioavailability of camptothecin derivative by P-Glycoprotein modulation.
Negi, LM; Talegaonkar, S; Tariq, M, 2013
)
1.83
"Irinotecan is a key drug in second- or further-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. "( A phase II trial of trastuzumab combined with irinotecan in patients with advanced HER2-positive chemo-refractory gastric cancer: Osaka Gastrointestinal Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group OGSG1203 (HERBIS-5).
Doki, Y; Furukawa, H; Kudo, T; Kurokawa, Y; Nishikawa, K; Oka, Y; Sakai, D; Satoh, T; Shimokawa, T; Tsujinaka, T, 2013
)
2.09
"Irinotecan is a key chemotherapeutic drug used to treat many tumors, including cervical and ovarian cancers; however, irinotecan can cause toxicity, particularly in the presence of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene polymorphisms, which are associated with reduced enzyme activity. "( Polymorphisms in the UGT1A1 gene predict adverse effects of irinotecan in the treatment of gynecologic cancer in Japanese patients.
Akahane, T; Aoki, D; Hirasawa, A; Kataoka, F; Kosaki, K; Makita, K; Nomura, H; Okubo, K; Saito, K; Susumu, N; Tanigawara, Y; Tominaga, E; Zama, T, 2013
)
2.07
"Etirinotecan pegol is a long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor designed to provide prolonged tumour-cell exposure to SN38, the active metabolite."( Two schedules of etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer: a randomised phase 2 study.
Awada, A; Barrett-Lee, PJ; Chan, S; Chia, YL; Cocquyt, V; Coleman, RE; Garcia, AA; Hamm, JT; Hannah, AL; Hoch, U; Huizing, MT; Jerusalem, GH; Mehdi, A; O'Reilly, SM; Perez, EA; Sideras, K; Young, DE; Zhao, C, 2013
)
1.28
"Irinotecan HCl (CPT-11) is an anticancer prodrug, but there is no available information addressing CPT-11-inhibited leukemia cells in in vitro and in vivo studies. "( Antitumor effects with apoptotic death in human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells and suppression of leukemia xenograft tumor growth by irinotecan HCl.
Chen, YL; Chiang, JH; Chueh, FS; Chung, JG; Hsueh, SC; Lee, CS; Lu, CC; Lu, HF; Yang, JS, 2015
)
2.06
"As irinotecan is a P-gp substrate, we tested here whether cetuximab could modify irinotecan concentration in mice."( Cetuximab increases concentrations of irinotecan and of its active metabolite SN-38 in plasma and tumour of human colorectal carcinoma-bearing mice.
Abbara, C; Bonhomme-Faivre, L; Chu, C; Farinotti, R; Gonin, P; Polrot, M; Tandia, M, 2014
)
1.19
"Irinotecan is a useful chemotherapeutic for the treatment of various cancers. "( Inflammasome activation is reactive oxygen species dependent and mediates irinotecan-induced mucositis through IL-1β and IL-18 in mice.
Arifa, RD; de Paula, TP; Fagundes, CT; Lima, RL; Madeira, MF; Menezes-Garcia, Z; Rachid, MA; Ryffel, B; Souza, DG; Tavares, LD; Teixeira, MM; Zamboni, DS, 2014
)
2.08
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor approved worldwide as a first- and second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC). "( RNA-seq reveals determinants for irinotecan sensitivity/resistance in colorectal cancer cell lines.
Cai, SJ; Huang, LY; Li, XX; Liang, L; Peng, JJ; Shi, DB; Zheng, HT, 2014
)
2.13
"Irinotecan is a cytotoxic agent administered by IV infusion in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. "( [Interest of UGT1A1 genotyping within digestive cancers treatment by irinotecan].
Bouquié, R; Boyer, JC; Broly, F; Etienne-Grimaldi, MC; Gagnieu, MC; Gaub, MP; Ged, C; Ghiringhelli, F; Le Guellec, C; Le Morvan, V; Loriot, MA; Philibert, L; Picard, N; Poncet, D; Quaranta, S; Thomas, F, 2014
)
2.08
"Irinotecan is a potent inhibitor of deoxyribonucleic acid topoisomerase 1 and the weekly schedule of 100-125 or 350 mg/m(2) administration on Day 1 every 3 weeks is recommended for recurrent small cell lung cancer. "( Low-dose irinotecan as a second-line chemotherapy for recurrent small cell lung cancer.
Goto, K; Matsumoto, S; Morise, M; Niho, S; Ohe, Y; Ohmatsu, H; Umemura, S; Yoh, K, 2014
)
2.26
"Irinotecan is a water-soluble camptothecin derivative with clinical activity against colorectal and small cell lung cancers and is currently a standard of care therapeutic in the treatment of colorectal cancer in combination with 5-fluorouracil. "( Irinophore C™, a lipid nanoparticle formulation of irinotecan, abrogates the gastrointestinal effects of irinotecan in a rat model of clinical toxicities.
Anantha, M; Bally, MB; Harasym, N; Manisali, I; Masin, D; Osooly, M; Ostlund, C; Santos, ND; Strutt, D; Sutherland, BW; Waterhouse, DN; Webb, MS; Wehbe, M, 2014
)
2.1
"Irinotecan (IRI) is a broad spectrum chemotherapeutic agent used individually or in combination to treat multiple malignancies. "( Polypeptide-based Micelles for Delivery of Irinotecan: Physicochemical and In vivo Characterization.
Cho, HJ; Choi, HG; Choi, JY; Kim, JO; Ramasamy, T; Shin, BS; Umadevi, SK; Yong, CS, 2015
)
2.12
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor used for decades for the treatment of colorectal cancer."( A phase II study of weekly irinotecan in patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2- negative breast cancer and increased copy numbers of the topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) gene: a study protocol.
Balslev, E; Brünner, N; Kümler, I; Nielsen, D; Stenvang, J, 2015
)
1.44
"Irinotecan is a camptothecin analogue currently used in clinical practice to treat advanced colorectal cancer. "( FL118, a novel camptothecin derivative, is insensitive to ABCG2 expression and shows improved efficacy in comparison with irinotecan in colon and lung cancer models with ABCG2-induced resistance.
Del Rio, M; Gongora, C; Jin, C; Lam, H; Li, F; Ling, X; Wani, M; Welch, J; Westover, D, 2015
)
2.07
"Irinotecan is a widely used topoisomerase-I-inhibitor with a very narrow therapeutic window because of its severe toxicity. "( Fasting protects against the side effects of irinotecan but preserves its anti-tumor effect in Apc15lox mutant mice.
Bijman-Lagcher, W; de Bruin, RW; Huisman, SA; IJzermans, JN; Smits, R, 2015
)
2.12
"Irinotecan is an effective drug in the treatment of colorectal cancer. "( [Examination of UGT1A1 polymorphisms and irinotecan-induced neutropenia in patients with Colorectal cancer].
Azuma, Y; Hanashiro, K; Nakachi, A; Nishiki, T; Ota, M; Shimabuku, M; Shimabukuro, N; Shiroma, H; Teruya, T; Toritsuka, D, 2015
)
2.13
"Irinotecan is a cytotoxic agent used widely for the treatment of solid tumors, particularly for metastatic colorectal cancers. "( ABCC5 and ABCG1 polymorphisms predict irinotecan-induced severe toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Cecchin, E; Chen, S; Couture, F; Guillemette, C; Innocenti, F; Jonker, D; Laverdière, I; Lévesque, E; Toffoli, G; Villeneuve, L, 2015
)
2.13
"Irinotecan is a cytotoxic agent used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Determination of irinotecan and SN38 in human plasma by TurboFlow™ liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Authier, N; Durando, X; Eschalier, A; Herviou, P; Libert, F; Pinguet, J; Richard, D; Roche, L, 2016
)
2.22
"Irinotecan is a camptothecin analog used worldwide for a broad range of solid tumors, including colorectal and lung cancers. "( [UGT1A1 Genotyping for Proper Use of Irinotecan].
Ando, Y; Matsuoka, A, 2015
)
2.13
"Irinotecan hydrochloride is a camptothecin derivative that exerts antitumor activity against a variety of tumors. "( Irinotecan, a key chemotherapeutic drug for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Fujita, K; Ishida, H; Kubota, Y; Sasaki, Y, 2015
)
3.3
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a first-line anti-colon cancer drug, however; CPT-11-induced toxicity remains a key factor limiting its clinical application. "( Irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced elevation of bile acids potentiates suppression of IL-10 expression.
Cao, YF; Chen, Q; Chen, Y; Fang, ZZ; Gonzalez, FJ; Jiang, C; Lu, D; Sun, DX; Tanaka, N; Wang, H; Xie, C; Zhang, D, 2016
)
3.32
"Irinotecan is a useful chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of several solid tumors. "( The reduction of oxidative stress by nanocomposite Fullerol decreases mucositis severity and reverts leukopenia induced by Irinotecan.
Arifa, RDN; Barcelos, LS; Garcia, ZM; Krambrock, K; Ladeira, LO; Lima, RL; Madeira, MFM; Paula, TP; Pinheiro, MVB; Pinho, V; Souza, DG; Teixeira, MM; Ÿvila, TV, 2016
)
2.08
"Irinotecan is a widely used antineoplastic drug, mostly employed for the treatment of colorectal cancer. "( Cross-validation of a mass spectrometric-based method for the therapeutic drug monitoring of irinotecan: implementation of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry in pharmacokinetic measurements.
Agostini, M; Calandra, E; Crotti, S; Giodini, L; Marangon, E; Nitti, D; Posocco, B; Toffoli, G; Traldi, P, 2016
)
2.1
"Irinotecan (IRT) is an important part of the first- and second-line regimen for metastatic colorectal and some other cancers. "( Development of polymeric irinotecan nanoparticles using a novel lactone preservation strategy.
Choi, HG; Gupta, B; Kim, JO; Poudel, BK; Ramasamy, T; Thapa, RK; Yong, CS; Youn, YS, 2016
)
2.18
"Irinotecan is a topo-isomerase-I inhibitor with broad antitumor activity in solid tumors. "( Clinical and pharmacogenetic factors associated with irinotecan toxicity.
Gelderblom, H; Guchelaar, HJ; Kweekel, D, 2008
)
2.04
"Irinotecan hydrochloride is an inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase I enzyme by its main active metabolite SN-38. "( [Prevention of irinotecan hydrochloride-induced diarrhea by oral administration of Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota in rats].
Miya, T; Morimoto, Y; Ooi, K; Sasaki, H, 2008
)
2.14
"Irinotecan is a cytotoxic agent with activity against gliomas. "( A phase II study of thalidomide and irinotecan for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme.
Cole, BF; Eskey, CJ; Fadul, CE; Kingman, LS; Meyer, LP; Newton, HB; Pipas, JM; Rhodes, CH; Roberts, DW, 2008
)
2.06
"Irinotecan is an active drug in the first and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. "( Irinotecan in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Díaz-Rubio, E; García-Saenz, JA; Puente, J; Sastre, J, 2008
)
3.23
"Irinotecan (IRI) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor active as first- or second-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). "( Weekly irinotecan plus protracted venous fluorouracil infusion (WI-FI) in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study.
Bergnolo, P; Berno, E; Biscardi, M; Boglione, A; Comandone, A; Cutin, SC; Dal Canton, O; Garetto, F; Inguì, M; Oliva, C; Pochettino, P,
)
2.03
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a clinically important anticancer prodrug that requires enzymatic hydrolysis by carboxyesterase to generate the active metabolite SN-38. "( Local enzymatic hydrolysis of an endogenously generated metabolite can enhance CPT-11 anticancer efficacy.
Chen, KC; Prijovich, ZM; Roffler, SR, 2009
)
1.8
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase-I (Top-I) inhibitor used for the treatment of colorectal cancer. "( Epigenetic mechanisms of irinotecan sensitivity in colorectal cancer cell lines.
Cortesi, F; Crea, F; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Gallegos Ruiz, MI; Giovannetti, E; Mey, V; Nannizzi, S; Peters, GJ; Ricciardi, S, 2009
)
2.1
"Irinotecan is a chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of CRC and has demonstrated synergistic potential when used with radiation."( Treatment of fluorouracil-refractory patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer by using yttrium-90 resin microspheres plus concomitant systemic irinotecan chemotherapy.
Bower, GD; Briggs, GM; George, J; Goldstein, D; Olver, IN; Pavlakis, N; Price, D; Rossleigh, MA; Tapner, MJ; Taylor, DJ; van Hazel, GA, 2009
)
1.27
"Irinotecan is an anti-neoplastic agent that is widely used for treating colorectal and lung cancers, but often causes toxicities such as severe myelosuppression and diarrhea. "( Single nucleotide polymorphism in ABCG2 is associated with irinotecan-induced severe myelosuppression.
Cha, PC; Furuhata, T; Harada, H; Hirata, K; Kawamoto, S; Mushiroda, T; Nakamura, Y; Nishidate, T; Sasaki, K; Shimoyama, R; Shinoda, N; Zembutsu, H, 2009
)
2.04
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a genotoxic topoisomerase I inhibitor."( Attenuation of cytogenetic effects by erythropoietin in human lymphocytes in vitro and P388 ascites tumor cells in vivo treated with irinotecan (CPT-11).
Chrisafi, S; Digkas, E; Hatzimichail, A; Kareli, D; Lialiaris, T; Mantadakis, E; Passadaki, T; Vargemezis, V, 2010
)
1.29
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a common chemotherapeutic agent, but it causes side effects, including genotoxicity with damages the DNA of blood cells."( Genotoxicity of irinotecan and its modulation by vitamins A, C and E in human lymphocytes from healthy individuals and cancer patients.
Drozda, R; Grzegorczyk, K; Kontek, R; Sliwiński, M, 2010
)
1.43
"Irinotecan is an interesting agent for individualized dosing, given its complex metabolism and increasing knowledge of its pharmacokinetics predictors."( Individualizing dosing of irinotecan.
Innocenti, F; Ratain, MJ, 2010
)
1.38
"Irinotecan is a promising anticancer agent for the treatment of childhood cancer unresponsive to conventional chemotherapy. "( Treatment of childhood sarcoma with irinotecan: bilirubin level as a predictor of gastrointestinal toxicity.
Attinà, G; Coccia, P; Riccardi, R; Ruggiero, A; Scalzone, M, 2009
)
2.07
"Irinotecan is an anticancer agent that stabilizes topoisomerase I/DNA complexes. "( In vivo bioassay to detect irinotecan-stabilized DNA/topoisomerase I complexes in rats.
Barth, SW; Briviba, K; Esselen, M; Jäger, N; Marko, D; Watzl, B, 2010
)
2.1
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I interactive agent, widely used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Assessment of cyto/genotoxicity of irinotecan in v79 cells using the comet, micronucleus, and chromosome aberration assay.
Gamulin, M; Kasuba, V; Rozgaj, R; Trosić, I, 2010
)
2.08
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a widely used anticancer drug, especially for the treatment of colorectal cancer. "( Pharmacogenetics of irinotecan disposition and toxicity: a review.
Fujita, K; Sparreboom, A, 2010
)
2.13
"Irinotecan is a camptothecin analog used as an anticancer drug. "( Irinotecan pharmacogenomics.
Hoskins, JM; Marsh, S, 2010
)
3.25
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anticancer drug with a complex in vivo metabolism widely used in the treatment of colon cancer. "( Fast liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for routine assessment of irinotecan metabolic phenotype.
Casetta, B; Corona, G; Elia, C; Toffoli, G, 2010
)
2.03
"Irinotecan is an S-phase cell cycle specific plant alkaloid."( A patient with metastatic colon cancer to the liver presenting with cardiac arrest status post receiving combination irinotecan-panitumumab: a case report.
Toema, BM, 2010
)
1.29
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with activity in metastatic disease."( A randomized phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan, leucovorin and fluorouracil versus leucovorin and fluorouracil for stage II and III colon cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study.
Aravantinos, G; Bafaloukos, D; Bamias, A; Basdanis, G; Dimopoulos, MA; Economopoulos, T; Efstratiou, I; Fountzilas, G; Kafiri, G; Kalofonos, HP; Karanikiotis, C; Karina, M; Klouvas, G; Korantzis, I; Makatsoris, T; Malettou, L; Matsiakou, F; Miliaras, D; Papadimitriou, CA; Papakostas, P; Papaspirou, I; Pectasides, D; Pentheroudakis, G; Pisanidis, N; Samantas, E; Xiros, N, 2011
)
1.33
"Irinotecan is a known radiosensitizer with activity in neuroblastoma."( Phase I study of vincristine, irinotecan, and ¹³¹I-metaiodobenzylguanidine for patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: a new approaches to neuroblastoma therapy trial.
Chesler, L; DuBois, SG; Goodarzian, F; Groshen, S; Hawkins, R; Marachelian, A; Maris, JM; Matthay, KK; Mosse, YP; Shimada, H; Stewart, C; Tagen, M; Tsao-Wei, D; Villablanca, JG; Yanik, G, 2012
)
1.39
"Irinotecan is a second-line anticancer drug, but clinical treatment with irinotecan is limited due to its side effects."( Caspase-mediated pro-apoptotic interaction of panaxadiol and irinotecan in human colorectal cancer cells.
Calway, T; Du, GJ; Du, W; He, TC; Somogyi, J; Wang, CZ; Wen, XD; Yuan, CS; Zhang, ZY, 2012
)
1.34
"Irinotecan is a major drug for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and a promising agent for other applications like gastric cancer. "( Irinotecan resistance is accompanied by upregulation of EGFR and Src signaling in human cancer models.
Larsen, AK; Petitprez, A, 2013
)
3.28
"Irinotecan is an active radiosensitizer in preclinical studies and clinical trials in lung cancer."( Irinotecan, cisplatin, and radiation in esophageal cancer.
Ilson, DH; Kelsen, D; Minsky, B, 2002
)
2.48
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a prodrug of SN-38 and has been registered for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. "( Modulation of irinotecan metabolism by ketoconazole.
de Bruijn, P; Kehrer, DF; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J, 2002
)
2.12
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Non-linear pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in mice.
Canal, P; Chatelut, E; Guichard, S; Rouits, E, 2002
)
2.04
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anticancer agent for the treatment of colon cancer. "( Secreted and tumour targeted human carboxylesterase for activation of irinotecan.
de Graaf, M; Gerritsen, WR; Haisma, HJ; Kruyt, FA; Oosterhoff, D; Pinedo, HM; Sone, T; van Beusechem, VW; van der Meulen, IH, 2002
)
1.99
"Irinotecan is a first-line chemotherapeutic agent for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). "( Modulators of ceramide metabolism sensitize colorectal cancer cells to chemotherapy: a novel treatment strategy.
Bilchik, AJ; Cabot, MC; Litvak, DA, 2003
)
1.76
"Irinotecan is a water-soluble derivative of camptothecin, an alkylator originally extracted from the Chinese tree Camptotheca acuminata. "( The emerging role of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of malignant glioma in brain tumors.
Friedman, HS; Houghton, PJ; Keir, ST, 2003
)
2.08
"Irinotecan is an active drug in the treatment of a number of neoplastic diseases and is not concerned with the multidrug-resistance phenotype of tumor cells, a common mechanism of drug inactivation and resistance in patients with RCC."( A phase II study of irinotecan in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Chevreau, C; Culine, S; Droz, JP; Escudier, B; Fizazi, K; Mery-Mignard, D; Rolland, F, 2003
)
1.36
"Irinotecan is a promising new cytotoxic agent in treatment concurrently with radiation therapy in newly diagnosed locally advanced cervical cancer. "( Concurrent radiation therapy and irinotecan in stage IIIB cervical cancer.
Chanslip, Y; Pattaranutaporn, P; Suntornpong, N; Thephamongkhol, K, 2003
)
2.04
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a chemotherapeutic drug for cancer that causes severe diarrhea by an uncertain mechanism. "( Irinotecan causes severe small intestinal damage, as well as colonic damage, in the rat with implanted breast cancer.
Bowen, JM; Cummins, AG; Gibson, RJ; Inglis, MR; Keefe, DM, 2003
)
3.2
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a prodrug that is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. "( The relative contributions of carboxylesterase and beta-glucuronidase in the formation of SN-38 in human colorectal tumours.
Clarke, S; Dodds, HM; Rivory, LP; Schnitzler, M; Tobin, PJ,
)
1.57
"Irinotecan is an effective treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Compassionate use programme of irinotecan in colorectal cancer patients in The Netherlands.
de Witte, JH; Keizer, HJ; Peters, WG; ten Bokkel Huinink, WW; van Groeningen, CJ; Voest, EE, 2003
)
2.05
"Irinotecan is an active radiosensitizer, and trials have evaluated the combination of irinotecan with concurrent radiotherapy."( Irinotecan in esophageal cancer.
Ilson, DH; Minsky, B, 2003
)
2.48
"Irinotecan (Campto) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor currently approved for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer. "( Irinotecan (Campto) in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Pizzolato, JF; Saltz, LB, 2003
)
3.2
"Irinotecan is a water-soluble derivative of camptothecin, which is isolated from a Chinese tree, Camptotheca acuminata; Its effectiveness against neuroblastoma was confirmed by in vivo preclinical studies, and phase I clinical trials in Japan concluded the maximum tolerated dose of this agent is 160-180 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days, repeated after 25 days off. "( Current treatment and future directions in neuroblastoma.
Ikeda, H; Kuroiwa, M; Shitara, T; Tsuchida, Y, 2003
)
1.76
"Irinotecan is an active drug in colorectal cancer. "( Continuous infusion of hepatic arterial irinotecan in pretreated patients with colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver.
de Greve, J; Giaccone, G; Gruia, G; Pinedo, HM; van Groeningen, CJ; van Riel, JM, 2004
)
2.03
"5-FU/irinotecan is a valuable regimen for second-line treatment in 5-FU/platinum-resistant O-G carcinoma."( Phase II study of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with primary refractory or relapsed advanced oesophageal and gastric carcinoma.
Assersohn, L; Brown, G; Cunningham, D; Hill, ME; Norman, AR; Oates, J; Ward, C; Waters, JS, 2004
)
1.17
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor previously shown to be active in the treatment of malignant glioma. "( Phase 1 trial of irinotecan plus BCNU in patients with progressive or recurrent malignant glioma.
Affronti, ML; Allen, D; Bigner, DD; Bohlin, C; Friedman, AH; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Jackson, S; Lentz, C; Provenzale, JM; Quinn, JA; Reardon, DA; Rich, JN; Sampson, JH; Schweitzer, H; Tourt-Uhlig, S; Vredenburgh, J; Walker, A; Ziegler, K, 2004
)
2.11
"Irinotecan is an active cytotoxic agent for various cancers, and is converted to SN-38, its most active metabolite, by carboxylesterase converting enzyme (CCE) in vivo. "( In vitro conversion of irinotecan to SN-38 in human plasma.
Asaka-Amano, Y; Kasahara, Y; Kuriyama, T; Kurosu, K; Matsubara, H; Shingyoji, M; Takiguchi, Y; Tanabe, N; Tatsumi, K; Watanabe-Uruma, R, 2004
)
2.08
"Irinotecan (Camptosar) is a derivative of camptothecin, an inhibitor of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I."( Topoisomerase I inhibitors in small-cell lung cancer. The Japanese experience.
Horiike, A; Saijo, N, 2004
)
1.04
"Irinotecan (Camptosar) is a promising agent in advanced non-small-cell (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)."( Irinotecan in advanced lung cancer: focus on North American trials.
Langer, CJ, 2004
)
2.49
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a widely-used potent anticancer drug that inhibits mammalian DNA topoisomerase I, however overexpression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2 can confer cancer cells resistance to SN-38, the active form of CPT-11. "( Transport of SN-38 by the wild type of human ABC transporter ABCG2 and its inhibition by quercetin, a natural flavonoid.
Ikegami, Y; Ishikawa, T; Mitomo, H; Sano, K; Sawada, S; Yoshida, H; Yoshikawa, M, 2004
)
1.77
"Irinotecan is an active drug after fluorouracil (FU) failure in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). "( Activity of irinotecan, cisplatin and dacarbazine (CPD) combination in previously treated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Akbulut, H; Buyukcelik, A; Demirkazik, A; Icli, F; Onur, H; Utkan, G; Yalcin, B, 2004
)
2.15
"Irinotecan is a selective inhibitor of topoisomerase I, an enzyme part of the replication and transcription system of DNA. "( New approaches to prevent intestinal toxicity of irinotecan-based regimens.
Alimonti, A; Cognetti, F; Di Palma, M; Ferretti, G; Gelibter, A; Pavese, I; Rasio, D; Satta, F; Vecchione, A, 2004
)
2.02
"Irinotecan is an effective and safe second-line treatment for colorectal cancer."( A randomised phase II multicentre trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) using four different schedules in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Beijnen, JH; Bertelsen, K; Fennelly, D; Garin, A; Glimelius, B; Gruia, G; Kjaer, M; Kuppens, IE; Lefebvre, P; Moiseyenko, V; Mourier, A; Norum, J; Poulsen, JP; Richel, DJ; Schellens, JH; Schoemaker, NE; Sibaud, D; Smaaland, R; Starkhammer, H; ten Bokkel Huinink, WW; Tveit, KM; Voznyi, E, 2004
)
1.31
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an effective drug in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). "( Weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) in 5-FU heavily pretreated and poor-performance-status patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Balcells, M; Benavides, M; Carabantes, F; Cobo, M; García-Alfonso, P; Gil-Calle, S; Graupera, J; Muñoz-Martín, A; Pérez-Manga, G; Villar, E, 2004
)
2.22
"Irinotecan is an anticancer drug approved in combination therapy for advanced colorectal cancer. "( Pharmacogenetics of irinotecan toxicity.
Marsh, S; McLeod, HL, 2004
)
2.09
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has been approved for use as a first- and second-line treatment for colorectal cancer. "( Prediction of irinotecan pharmacokinetics by use of cytochrome P450 3A4 phenotyping probes.
de Bruijn, P; de Jong, FA; Figg, WD; Friberg, LE; Graveland, WJ; Lepper, ER; Mathijssen, RH; Rietveld, T; Sparreboom, A; van Schaik, RH; Verweij, J, 2004
)
2.13
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an important anti-cancer agent activated by carboxylesterase (CE). "( Effect of carboxylesterase inhibition on the anti-tumour effects of irinotecan.
Fujii, M; Kasakura, Y; Morishita, Y; Takayama, T,
)
1.81
"Irinotecan is a commonly used effective chemotherapeutic agent, causing severe gastrointestinal mucositis and diarrhea."( Palifermin reduces diarrhea and increases survival following irinotecan treatment in tumor-bearing DA rats.
Bowen, JM; Gibson, RJ; Keefe, DM, 2005
)
1.29
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a chemotherapeutic drug used to treat tumors by acting on malignant cells through inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I and inducing premature apoptosis. "( Irinotecan-induced colitis.
Bouzourene, H; Chaubert, P; Sandmeier, D, 2005
)
3.21
"Irinotecan is a cornerstone drug in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer, as demonstrated by several randomized studies proving a survival benefit for the first time. "( Irinotecan-based regimens in the adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer.
Douillard, JY, 2005
)
3.21
"Irinotecan is an analogue of camptothecin, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, that has an important role in the management of advanced colorectal cancer. "( Severe irinotecan-induced toxicities in a patient with uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 polymorphism.
Chung, G; Mehra, R; Murren, J; Psyrri, A; Smith, B, 2005
)
2.23
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that is highly active against small cell lung cancer (SCLC). "( Irinotecan and etoposide for previously untreated extensive-disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial of West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group.
Ariyoshi, Y; Fukuda, Y; Fukuoka, M; Isobe, T; Katakami, N; Komuta, K; Kudoh, S; Nakamura, S; Nakano, T; Takada, M; Takada, Y, 2005
)
3.21
"Irinotecan (CPT11) is a prodrug activated in humans mainly by carboxylesterase 2 (CES2) generating the SN38 metabolite responsible for the drug efficacy and toxicity. "( Carboxylesterase isoform 2 mRNA expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells is a predictive marker of the irinotecan to SN38 activation step in colorectal cancer patients.
Biason, P; Buonadonna, A; Cattarossi, G; Cecchin, E; Colussi, A; Corona, G; Frustaci, S; Masier, S; Toffoli, G, 2005
)
1.98
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a novel antineoplastic agent that takes effect by inhibiting topoisomerase I. "( Phase II study of a protracted irinotecan schedule in children with refractory or recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.
Arcamone, G; Bertolini, P; Bisogno, G; Carli, M; Paolucci, P; Prete, A; Provenzi, M; Riccardi, R; Ruggiero, A; Surico, G, 2006
)
2.06
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a prodrug that is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. "( The in vitro metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11) by carboxylesterase and beta-glucuronidase in human colorectal tumours.
Aulds, S; Clarke, S; Crawford, M; Eyers, T; Gallagher, J; Lee, S; Rivory, L; Seale, JP; Solomon, M; Tobin, P, 2006
)
2.07
"Irinotecan is a standard option for relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer. "( Single-agent irinotecan as second-line weekly chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Cordio, S; Rosati, G,
)
1.94
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a new drug of the camptothecin family which has shown significant activity in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. "( In vitro thermochemotherapy of colon cancer cell lines with irinotecan alone and combined with mitomycin C.
Benhamed, M; Chipponi, J; Gilly, FN; Glehen, O; Kwiatkowski, F; Le Page, S; Mohamed, F; Paulin, C; Pezet, D,
)
1.82
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an important anticancer drug in management of advanced colon cancer. "( A mechanistic study on altered pharmacokinetics of irinotecan by St. John's wort.
Cao, J; Chan, E; Chen, X; Duan, W; Hu, ZP; Huang, M; Wen, JY; Yang, XX; Yu, XQ; Zhou, SF, 2007
)
2.03
"Irinotecan is a chemotherapeutic agent which is commonly used in solid tumors, and causes GI mucositis manifested by severe diarrhea."( Velafermin improves gastrointestinal mucositis following irinotecan treatment in tumor-bearing DA rats.
Alvarez, E; Bowen, JM; Burns, J; Gibson, RJ; Keefe, DM; Logan, RM; Stringer, AM; Yeoh, AS, 2007
)
1.31
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase I and is clinically effective against several cancers. "( Role of cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1beta and KC) in the pathogenesis of CPT-11-induced intestinal mucositis in mice: effect of pentoxifylline and thalidomide.
Brito, GA; Carvalho, SB; Cunha, FQ; Melo, ML; Ribeiro, RA; Silva, JV; Soares, PM; Soares, RC; Souza, MH; Vale, ML, 2008
)
1.79
"Irinotecan is a common cytotoxic agent used in advanced colorectal cancers. "( Establishment of a single-dose irinotecan model of gastrointestinal mucositis.
Alvarez, E; Bowen, JM; Finnie, J; Gibson, RJ; Keefe, DM, 2007
)
2.07
"Irinotecan is an established therapeutic option in colorectal cancer. "( Phase II clinical trial for prevention of delayed diarrhea with cholestyramine/levofloxacin in the second-line treatment with irinotecan biweekly in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Fischbach, W; Flieger, D; Hainke, S; Keller, R; Klassert, C; Kleinschmidt, R, 2007
)
1.99
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a key drug for the treatment of various cancers. "( Tumor targeting carboxylesterase fused with anti-CEA scFv improve the anticancer effect with a less toxic dose of irinotecan.
Curiel, DT; Harada, A; Harada, T; Kuroki, M; Nakanishi, Y; Sone, T; Takayama, K; Uchino, J, 2008
)
2
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor widely used as an anticancer agent in the treatment of metastatic colon cancer. "( Altered expression of cell proliferation-related and interferon-stimulated genes in colon cancer cells resistant to SN38.
Breil, C; Candeil, L; Conseiller, E; Copois, V; Del Rio, M; Denis, V; Fraslon, C; Gongora, C; Martineau, P; Molina, F; Pau, B; Vezzio, N, 2008
)
1.79
"Irinotecan is an important drug for the treatment of solid tumors. "( Irinotecan pharmacogenetics: influence of pharmacodynamic genes.
Altes, A; Baiget, M; Culverhouse, R; Hoskins, JM; Marcuello, E; Marsh, S; Maxwell, T; McLeod, HL; Paré, L; Van Booven, DJ, 2008
)
3.23
"Irinotecan is a prodrug converted to the active cytotoxic molecule SN38 predominantly by the action of liver carboxylesterases. "( DTS-108, a novel peptidic prodrug of SN38: in vivo efficacy and toxicokinetic studies.
Arranz, V; Boukaissi, M; Chéné, AS; de Coupade, C; Dubois, V; Fruchart, JS; Kearsey, J; Meyer-Losic, F; Michel, M; Nicolazzi, C; Quinonero, J; Ravel, D; Ribes, F; Tranchant, I; Zoubaa, I, 2008
)
1.79
"Irinotecan is a drug commonly used for the treatment of cancer patients, both as a single agent or in combination therapy. "( UGT1A1*28 and other UGT1A polymorphisms as determinants of irinotecan toxicity.
Biason, P; Masier, S; Toffoli, G, 2008
)
2.03
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor with clinical activity in human malignancies. "( Limited sampling models for simultaneous estimation of the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38.
Chabot, GG, 1995
)
1.96
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a novel water-soluble camptothecin derivative selected for clinical testing based on its good in vitro and in vivo activity in various experimental systems, including pleiotropic drug-resistant tumors. "( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and active metabolite SN-38 during phase I trials.
Abigerges, D; Armand, JP; Bugat, R; Catimel, G; Chabot, GG; Culine, S; de Forni, M; Extra, JM; Hérait, P; Mahjoubi, M, 1995
)
1.98
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a camptothecine derivative with antitumor activity and inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase I. "( [Effect of chemotherapy using irinotecan (CPT-11) against recurrent colorectal cancer].
Fujimura, T; Kanno, M; Kurosaka, Y; Miwa, K; Miyazaki, I; Nishimura, G; Satou, T; Sugiyama, K; Yonemura, Y; Yoshimitsu, Y, 1995
)
2.02
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a novel water-soluble, semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin, with inhibitory effects on mammalian DNA topoisomerase I, high cytotoxic activity in vitro and anticancer activity in animal models. "( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the camptothecin derivative irinotecan, administered on a weekly schedule in cancer patients.
Bugat, R; Chabot, GG; Culine, S; de Forni, M; Extra, JM; Gouyette, A; Madelaine, I; Marty, ME; Mathieu-Boué, A, 1994
)
1.97
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a camptothecin derivative used for the treatment of cancer. "( Pharmacokinetics of SN-38 [(+)-(4S)-4,11-diethyl-4,9-dihydroxy-1H- pyrano[3',4':6,7]-indolizino[1,2-b]quinoline-3,14(4H,12H)-dione], an active metabolite of irinotecan, after a single intravenous dosing of 14C-SN-38 to rats.
Atsumi, R; Hakusui, H; Okazaki, O, 1995
)
1.93
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a semi-synthetic derivative of camptothecin currently in clinical trials. "( Experimental antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics of the camptothecin analog irinotecan (CPT-11) in mice.
Bissery, MC; Chabot, GG; Lavelle, F; Vrignaud, P, 1996
)
1.96
"Irinotecan (CPT-II) is a semisynthetic derivative of camptothecin. "( Irinotecan. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced colorectal cancer.
Markham, A; Wiseman, LR, 1996
)
3.18
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a new camptothecine derivative presently in development for the treatment of several advanced malignancies. "( The transformation of irinotecan (CPT-11) to its active metabolite SN-38 by human liver microsomes. Differential hydrolysis for the lactone and carboxylate forms.
Haaz, MC; Riché, C; Rivory, LP; Robert, J, 1997
)
2.05
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a water-soluble analogue of camptothecin showing activity in colon cancer. "( Metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11) by human hepatic microsomes: participation of cytochrome P-450 3A and drug interactions.
Haaz, MC; Riché, C; Rivory, L; Robert, J; Vernillet, L, 1998
)
2.1
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a promising antitumor agent, recently approved for use in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Genetic predisposition to the metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11). Role of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 in the glucuronidation of its active metabolite (SN-38) in human liver microsomes.
Coffman, BL; Green, MD; Iyer, L; King, CD; Ratain, MJ; Roy, SK; Tephly, TR; Whitington, PF, 1998
)
2
"Irinotecan is a water-soluble camptothecin analogue. "( A risk-benefit assessment of irinotecan in solid tumours.
Rowinsky, EK; Siu, LL, 1998
)
2.03
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a semisynthetic camptothecin derivative with a broad spectrum of anti-tumour activity. "( Determinants of CPT-11 and SN-38 activities in human lung cancer cells.
Boven, E; Dingemans, AM; Giaccone, G; Jansen, WJ; Kedde, MA; Pinedo, HM; van Ark-Otte, J; van der Vijgh, WJ, 1998
)
1.74
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a new drug active in colorectal cancer. "( Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of irinotecan after administration by the intravenous versus intraperitoneal route in mice.
Bugat, R; Canal, P; Chatelut, E; Guichard, S; Lochon, I; Mahjoubi, M, 1998
)
1.99
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a chemotherapeutic agent that is active in the treatment of a variety of solid tumor malignancies. "( Interleukin 15 offers selective protection from irinotecan-induced intestinal toxicity in a preclinical animal model.
Black, JD; Cao, S; Rustum, YM; Troutt, AB, 1998
)
2
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has been confirmed to be active against a broad spectrum of neoplasms including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). "( Unexpected hepatotoxicities in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with irinotecan (CPT-11) and etoposide.
Igarashi, T; Kobayashi, Y; Murayama, T; Ohtsu, T; Sasaki, Y; Tobinai, K, 1998
)
1.97
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an analogue of 20(S)-camptothecin with promising activity against several tumor types. "( Pharmacokinetic interrelationships of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its three major plasma metabolites in patients enrolled in phase I/II trials.
Armand, JP; Canal, P; Haaz, MC; Lokiec, F; Rivory, LP; Robert, J, 1997
)
2.01
"Irinotecan is an effective agent for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. "( Irinotecan: a new antineoplastic agent for the management of colorectal cancer.
Cersosimo, RJ, 1998
)
3.19
"Irinotecan is a useful addition to the antineoplastic drug family and offers significant efficacy for treatment of patients with fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan: a new antineoplastic agent for the management of colorectal cancer.
Cersosimo, RJ, 1998
)
3.19
"Irinotecan (CPT11) is a synthetic camptothecin-derived DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor. "( [Irinotecan: various administration schedules, study of drug combinations, phase I experience].
Armand, JP; Boige, V; Raymond, E, 1998
)
2.65
"Irinotecan or CPT11 is a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor. "( [Irinotecan monotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancers: results of phase II trials].
Peeters, M; Van Cutsem, E, 1998
)
2.65
"Irinotecan is a new topoisomerase I inhibitor. "( [Irinotecan-containing combinations in solid tumors, except colonic carcinomas].
Armand, JP; Couteau, C, 1998
)
2.65
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor which has shown activity in vitro against several cancer cell lines and some promising clinical responses in phase I and II trials in various solid tumors. "( In vitro sensitivity of fresh ovarian carcinoma specimens to CPT-11 (irinotecan).
O'meara, AT; Sevin, BU, 1999
)
1.98
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a derivative of the chemotherapeutic agent camptothecin. "( A review of the clinical experience with irinotecan (CPT-11).
Horowitz, RW; Wadler, S; Wiernik, PH,
)
1.84
"Irinotecan is a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor that has a wide spectrum of activity against human tumors in both preclinical and clinical studies. "( A phase II trial of irinotecan in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.
Chapman, Y; Prager, D; Reese, DM; Rosen, PJ; Tchekmedyian, S,
)
1.9
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anticancer drug that occasionally produces acute cholinergic side effects. "( The mechanism for the inhibition of acetylcholinesterases by irinotecan (CPT-11).
Dodds, HM; Rivory, LP, 1999
)
1.99
"Irinotecan is a camptothecin analog with an active metabolite, SN-38, which inhibits topoisomerase I activity by stabilizing the topoisomerase I-DNA cleavable complex."( Single-agent gemcitabine and gemcitabine/irinotecan combination (irimogem) in non-small cell lung cancer.
Bahadori, HR; Eckardt, JR; Green, MR; Leong, SS; Perkel, JA; Putman, T; Rocha Lima, CM; Safa, AR; Sherman, CA, 1999
)
1.29
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anticancer agent widely employed in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma. "( Simple and rapid determination of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 in plasma by high-performance liquid-chromatography: application to clinical pharmacokinetic studies.
Aldaz, A; Calvo, E; Castellanos, C; Escoriaza, J; Giráldez, J, 2000
)
2.03
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a derivative of the chemotherapeutic agent Camptothecin. "( [CPT-11 (irinotecan)--evidence from molecular and pharmacological studies and clinical applications].
Ishikawa, N; Isobe, T; Oguri, T, 2000
)
2.17
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor commonly used in the treatment of colorectal tumors. "( Characterization of CPT-11 converting carboxylesterase activity in colon tumor and normal tissues: comparison with p-nitro-phenylacetate converting carboxylesterase activity.
Bugat, R; Canal, P; Chatelut, E; Guichard, S; Hennebelle, I; Terret, C, 2000
)
1.75
"Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that prolongs survival in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). "( Irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer: a new survival standard.
Alakl, M; Awad, L; Douillard, JY; Elfring, GL; Gruia, G; Locker, PK; Miller, LL; Pirotta, N; Saltz, LB, 2001
)
3.2
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a semi-synthetic camptothecin with a broad spectrum of clinical activity. "( Metabolism of CPT-11. Impact on activity.
Rivory, LP, 2000
)
1.75
"Irinotecan (Camptosar) is an active chemotherapeutic agent for lung, gastric, esophageal, and colorectal cancers and a potent radiosensitizer. "( Phase I study of irinotecan and concurrent radiation therapy for upper GI tumors.
Ajani, JA; Blumenshein, GR; Fairweather, JS; Feig, BW; Ho, L; Janjan, NA; Komaki, R; Lynch, PM; Pazdur, R; Pisters, PW; Raijman, I; Walsh, GL, 2000
)
2.09
"Irinotecan (Camptosar) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with demonstrated antitumor activity against a wide variety of malignancies. "( Irinotecan-based combinations for the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer.
Saltz, L, 2000
)
3.19
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an active drug in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. "( Irinotecan and chronomodulated infusion of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: a phase I study.
Aschelter, AM; Comis, S; D'Attino, RM; Dogliotti, L; Garufi, C; Nisticó, C; Perrone, M; Pugliese, P; Tampellini, M; Terzoli, E, 2001
)
3.2
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a semisynthetic derivative of camptothecine that has proved activity in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma. "( Hepatic extraction, metabolism, and biliary excretion of irinotecan in the isolated perfused rat liver.
Farabos, C; Gires, P; Haaz, MC; Robert, J, 2001
)
2
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a camptothecin analog with low (about 10--20%) and variable oral bioavailability in animal models. "( Active transepithelial transport of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its metabolites by human intestinal Caco-2 cells.
de Bruijn, P; de Jonge, MJ; Kurihara, M; Nishiyama, M; Sparreboom, A; Takano, H; Verweij, J; Yamamoto, W, 2001
)
2.03
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an anticancer prodrug. "( A new metabolite of irinotecan in which formation is mediated by human hepatic cytochrome P-450 3A4.
Kaniwa, N; Ozawa, S; Sai, K; Sawada, JI, 2001
)
2.08
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I, and has demonstrated antitumor activity against metastatic colorectal cancer. "( [Standard therapy of CPT-11 for colorectal cancer].
Saitoh, S; Sakata, Y, 2001
)
1.75
"Irinotecan is a prodrug that is hydrolyzed by carboxylesterase in vivo to form an active metabolite SN-38. "( Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.
Ando, Y; Hasegawa, Y; Ichiki, M; Shimokata, K; Sugiyama, T; Ueoka, H, 2002
)
1.99
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an active agent for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer and other tumor types, which frequently metastasize in the liver."( Continuous administration of irinotecan by hepatic arterial infusion: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study.
Gall, H; Giaccone, G; Gruia, G; Kedde, MA; Leisink, JM; Pinedo, HM; van der Vijgh, WJ; van Groeningen, CJ; van Riel, JM, 2002
)
1.33
"Irinotecan/gemcitabine is a new combination that offers encouraging activity in terms of radiographic and CA 19-9 response and notable 1-year survival in pancreatic cancer. "( Irinotecan plus gemcitabine induces both radiographic and CA 19-9 tumor marker responses in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer.
Bruckner, H; Compton, LD; Dudek, A; Eckardt, J; Elfring, GL; Green, MR; Hainsworth, J; Lester, E; Locker, PK; Miller, LL; Miller, W; Rocha Lima, CM; Savarese, D; Saville, W; Yunus, F, 2002
)
3.2
"Irinotecan is a drug of the camptothecin family that has proven activity in advanced colon cancer, with about 20% responses in untreated as well as in 5-fluorouracil-resistant tumors. "( Determinants of the cytotoxicity of irinotecan in two human colorectal tumor cell lines.
Agostini, C; Charasson, V; Montaudon, D; Pavillard, V; Richard, S; Robert, J, 2002
)
2.03
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is an active drug in colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: results of a phase I clinical study.
Cantore, M; Fiorentini, G; Giovanis, P; Guadagni, S; Lucchi, SR; Papiani, G,
)
2.3
"Irinotecan is a novel antineoplastic agent that works by inhibiting the enzyme, topoisomerase 1. "( Irinotecan for pediatric solid tumors: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience.
Calleja, E; Cosetti, M; Gerald, W; Gorlick, R; Healey, JH; Huvos, AG; LaQuaglia, M; Meyers, PA; Trippett, T; Wexler, LH, 2002
)
3.2
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with antitumor activity on a wide variety of neoplasms in several preclinical studies, but it showed poor efficacy in patients with nervous system tumors. "( Antitumoral effect of irinotecan (CPT-11) on an experimental model of malignant neuroectodermal tumor.
Morales, C; Vaquero, J; Zurita, M, 2002
)
2.07
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a water-soluble camptothecin (CPT) derivative that has been recently approved in the United States for patients as a first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer. "( Intestinal transport of irinotecan in Caco-2 cells and MDCK II cells overexpressing efflux transporters Pgp, cMOAT, and MRP1.
Guo, A; Luo, FR; Paranjpe, PV; Rubin, E; Sinko, P, 2002
)
2.06

Effects

Irinotecan has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecen itself. Irinotacan has an anti-VEGF effect inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation, increasing apoptosis and reducing microvascular density.

Irinotecan has been found a better salvage therapy in patients who are resistant to 5-fluorouracil. The drug has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecen itself.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Irinotecan has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecan itself."( Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics.
Bins, S; de Man, FM; Goey, AKL; Mathijssen, RHJ; van Schaik, RHN, 2018
)
1.52
"Irinotecan has a 20% to 25% response rate (RR) in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). "( N0436 (Alliance): A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan With Cetuximab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Exposed to Anthracycline and/or Taxane-Containing Therapy.
Advani, PP; Crozier, JA; Hobday, T; Jaslowski, AJ; LaPlant, B; Moreno-Aspitia, A; Perez, EA, 2016
)
2.15
"Irinotecan has an important place in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Current place of high-dose irinotecan chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ducreux, M; Hebbar, M; Ychou, M, 2009
)
2.09
"Irinotecan has an anti-VEGF effect inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation, increasing apoptosis and reducing microvascular density which is only limited by irinotecan toxicity levels."( Irinotecan therapy and molecular targets in colorectal cancer: a systemic review.
Ho, YH; Lam, AK; Sebesan, S; Weekes, J, 2009
)
2.52
"Irinotecan has an established role in the treatment of metastatic rectal cancer."( Irinotecan and radiosensitization in rectal cancer.
Illum, H, 2011
)
2.53
"Irinotecan has a significant anti-tumour activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with relapsed hepatoblastoma and therefore should be considered for the treatment of these patients. "( Efficacy of irinotecan single drug treatment in children with refractory or recurrent hepatoblastoma--a phase II trial of the childhood liver tumour strategy group (SIOPEL).
Brock, P; Brugières, L; Casanova, M; Child, M; Czauderna, P; de Camargo, B; Maibach, R; Morland, B; Pariente, D; Paris, C; Perilongo, G; Plaschkes, J; Roebuck, D; Ronghe, M; Zimmermann, A; Zsíros, J, 2012
)
2.2
"Irinotecan has a reported response rate of 10%-20% in such patients."( The palliative benefit of irinotecan in 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer: its prospective evaluation by a Multicenter Canadian Trial.
Feld, R; Fields, A; Goel, R; Hedley, D; Jolivet, J; Lee, IM; Maroun, J; Michael, M; Moore, MJ; Oza, A; Pintilie, M, 2002
)
1.34
"Irinotecan has an acceptable tolerability profile and is not associated with cumulative toxicities in patients with metastatic CRC; regimens containing irinotecan extend treatment duration and improve survival."( Irinotecan in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Fuchs, C; Hoff, PM; Mitchell, EP, 2006
)
2.5
"Irinotecan-bevacizumab has been recommended in this setting in France after encouraging results of pilot studies."( The role of irinotecan-bevacizumab as rescue regimen in children with low-grade gliomas: a retrospective nationwide study in 72 patients.
Andre, N; Beccaria, K; Bertozzi, AI; Boddaert, N; Bourdeaut, F; Butel, T; Cuinet, A; De Carli, E; de Marcellus, C; Dufour, C; Figarella-Branger, D; Fouyssac, F; Grill, J; Leblond, P; Pasqualini, C; Puget, S; Robert, MP; Tauziède-Espariat, A; Valteau-Couanet, D; Varlet, P, 2022
)
1.82
"Irinotecan has been found a better salvage therapy in patients who are resistant to 5-fluorouracil."( Irinotecan inducing sinus pause bradycardia in a patient with small round cell cancer.
Ambreen, S; Denha, EJ; Lohia, P; Mir, TA; Rahim, A; Shaikhli, RA; Yassin, AS, 2020
)
2.72
"Irinotecan has been used in the treatment of various malignancies for many years. "( Irinotecan-Still an Important Player in Cancer Chemotherapy: A Comprehensive Overview.
Kciuk, M; Kontek, R; Marciniak, B, 2020
)
3.44
"Irinotecan has a highly complex metabolism, including hydrolyzation by carboxylesterases to its active metabolite SN-38, which is 100- to 1000-fold more active compared with irinotecan itself."( Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics.
Bins, S; de Man, FM; Goey, AKL; Mathijssen, RHJ; van Schaik, RHN, 2018
)
1.52
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been approved for the treatment of advanced or metastatic disease either as a single agent or, more commonly, as part of combined chemotherapeutic regimens."( Irinotecan toxicity during treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: focus on pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.
Filip, S; Nekvindová, J; Paulík, A, 2020
)
2.72
"Irinotecan and topotecan have been widely used as anticancer drugs for the past 20 years. "( Targeting Topoisomerase I in the Era of Precision Medicine.
Pommier, Y; Thomas, A, 2019
)
1.96
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) has also shown efficacy in recurrent gliomas monotherapy with moderate response."( Irinotecan and temozolomide brain distribution: a focus on ABCB1.
Beccaria, K; Carpentier, A; Farinotti, R; Fernandez, C; Goldwirt, L, 2014
)
2.57
"Irinotecan has synergism with 5-fluorouracil and shows efficacy in advanced breast cancer."( Irinotecan and capecitabine combination chemotherapy in a patient with triple-negative breast cancer relapsed after adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline and taxane.
Cho, JM; Go, SI; Jeon, KN; Kang, JH; Kang, MH; Kim, HG; Kim, MJ; Lee, A; Lee, GW; Lee, JH; Lee, US; Lee, WS, 2015
)
2.58
"Irinotecan has shown some efficacy in recurrent malignant gliomas."( Preclinical impact of bevacizumab on brain and tumor distribution of irinotecan and temozolomide.
Beccaria, K; Carpentier, A; Farinotti, R; Fernandez, C; Goldwirt, L; Idbaih, A; Labussiere, M; Levasseur, C; Milane, A; Schmitt, C, 2015
)
1.37
"Irinotecan has also displayed efficacy in clinical trials of NSCLC."( Topoisomerase-I PS506 as a Dual Function Cancer Biomarker.
Gjerset, RA; Zhao, M, 2015
)
1.14
"Irinotecan has a 20% to 25% response rate (RR) in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). "( N0436 (Alliance): A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan With Cetuximab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Exposed to Anthracycline and/or Taxane-Containing Therapy.
Advani, PP; Crozier, JA; Hobday, T; Jaslowski, AJ; LaPlant, B; Moreno-Aspitia, A; Perez, EA, 2016
)
2.15
"Irinotecan has been used in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein is a potential predictive marker of irinotecan efficacy for colorectal cancer.
Fujiwara, H; Ikai, A; Kishimoto, M; Otsuji, E; Sakai, T; Sowa, Y; Watanabe, M; Yanagisawa, A, 2016
)
2.11
"Irinotecan monotherapy has demonstrated efficacy; however, its efficacy appears to be enhanced when used in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents."( Experience with irinotecan for the treatment of malignant glioma.
Desjardins, A; Friedman, HS; Reardon, DA; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2009
)
1.42
"Irinotecan has an important place in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Current place of high-dose irinotecan chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ducreux, M; Hebbar, M; Ychou, M, 2009
)
2.09
"Irinotecan has an anti-VEGF effect inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation, increasing apoptosis and reducing microvascular density which is only limited by irinotecan toxicity levels."( Irinotecan therapy and molecular targets in colorectal cancer: a systemic review.
Ho, YH; Lam, AK; Sebesan, S; Weekes, J, 2009
)
2.52
"Irinotecan has radiosensitizing effects and shows synergism with nitrosoureas. "( Phase II NCCTG trial of RT + irinotecan and adjuvant BCNU plus irinotecan for newly diagnosed GBM.
Ames, MM; Arusell, R; Ballman, KV; Brown, PD; Buckner, JC; Galanis, E; Giannini, C; Hammack, JE; Jaeckle, KA; McGovern, RM; Morton, RF; Nikcevich, DA; Reid, JM; Safgren, SL; Schomberg, PJ; Uhm, JH; Wender, DB, 2010
)
2.09
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) has shown emerging promise in the treatment of malignant gliomas. "( Metronomic treatment of malignant glioma xenografts with irinotecan (CPT-11) inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth.
Ishikawa, E; Kamiyama, H; Mashiko, R; Matsumura, A; Osuka, S; Takano, S, 2010
)
2.05
"Irinotecan has significant activity in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). "( Weekly alternating therapy with irinotecan plus cisplatin and etoposide plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with extensive small cell lung carcinoma.
Blumenschein, GR; Feng, L; Fossella, FV; Glisson, BS; Johnson, FM; Karp, DD; Peeples, BO; Stewart, DJ; Uyeki, J; William, WN, 2010
)
2.09
"Irinotecan has an established role in the treatment of metastatic rectal cancer."( Irinotecan and radiosensitization in rectal cancer.
Illum, H, 2011
)
2.53
"Irinotecan has a significant anti-tumour activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with relapsed hepatoblastoma and therefore should be considered for the treatment of these patients. "( Efficacy of irinotecan single drug treatment in children with refractory or recurrent hepatoblastoma--a phase II trial of the childhood liver tumour strategy group (SIOPEL).
Brock, P; Brugières, L; Casanova, M; Child, M; Czauderna, P; de Camargo, B; Maibach, R; Morland, B; Pariente, D; Paris, C; Perilongo, G; Plaschkes, J; Roebuck, D; Ronghe, M; Zimmermann, A; Zsíros, J, 2012
)
2.2
"Irinotecan has been tested in various combinations with platinum agents but the optimal regimen remains uncertain."( A phase I clinical trial of irinotecan and carboplatin in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
Bradbury, J; Cave, J; Crabb, SJ; Johnson, PW; Muthuramalingam, SR; Nolan, L; Ottensmeier, C; Selman, D, 2012
)
1.39
"Irinotecan has also been studied in combination regimens, most commonly irinotecan plus cisplatin."( Irinotecan in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Gershenson, DM, 2002
)
2.48
"Irinotecan has shown antitumour activity in human testicular tumour xenografts in nude mice."( Irinotecan in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer: a phase II study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group.
Bokemeyer, C; Hentrich, M; Kanz, L; Klaproth, H; Kollmannsberger, C; Kubin, T; Kuczyk, M; Mayer, F; Rick, O; Sayer, HG; Spott, C; Welslau, M, 2002
)
2.48
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been shown to prolong survival and improve quality of life in comparison to best supportive care in colorectal cancer patients with pretreatment of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). "( Adding weekly irinotecan to high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (HD-5-FU/FA) after failure for first-line HD-5-FU/FA in advanced colorectal cancer--a phase II study.
Emig, M; Hartung, G; Hehlmann, R; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, R; Pilz, L; Queisser, W; Samel, S; Willeke, F, 2002
)
2.12
"Irinotecan has a reported response rate of 10%-20% in such patients."( The palliative benefit of irinotecan in 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer: its prospective evaluation by a Multicenter Canadian Trial.
Feld, R; Fields, A; Goel, R; Hedley, D; Jolivet, J; Lee, IM; Maroun, J; Michael, M; Moore, MJ; Oza, A; Pintilie, M, 2002
)
1.34
"Irinotecan has moderate efficacy and substantial toxicity in patients with metastatic platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer."( Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer or peritoneal cancer.
Bodurka, DC; Gano, J; Gershenson, DM; Kavanagh, JJ; Levenback, C; Wharton, JT; Wolf, JK, 2003
)
2.1
"Irinotecan has been widely used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, small cell lung cancer and several other solid tumors."( Lessons learned from the irinotecan metabolic pathway.
Ma, MK; McLeod, HL, 2003
)
1.34
"Irinotecan (CPT11) has established activity against advanced colorectal cancer without cross-resistance with 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin-based therapy. "( Irinotecan (CPT11) plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) as salvage therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) after failed oxaliplatin plus 5-FU and LV: a pilot study in Taiwan.
Chen, PM; Chen, WS; Chiou, TJ; Lin, JK; Liu, JH; Tai, CJ; Wang, WS; Yen, CC, 2003
)
3.2
"Irinotecan has shown activity in advanced colorectal cancer resistant to leucovorin and fluorouracil. "( Bimonthly leucovorin, infusion 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI-2) for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
André, T; Artru, P; Carola, E; de Gramont, A; Gilles-Amar, V; Krulik, M; Louvet, C; Mabro, M, 2003
)
2
"Irinotecan hydrochloride has been administered to patients with breast cancer resistant to anthracyclines and/or taxanes in our department. "( [Retrospective study on utility of irinotecan hydrochloride in patients with advanced and recurrent breast cancer].
Hirono, M; Ikeda, M; Kurebayashi, J; Nakashima, K; Nomura, N; Okubo, S; Sonoo, H; Tanaka, K; Udagawa, K; Yamamoto, Y, 2003
)
2.04
"Irinotecan has proven anti-tumor activity as induction treatment in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or as second-line treatment after 5-FU in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Prospective multicenter phase II study of irinotecan as third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer and progression after bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil.
Batran, SA; Bokemeyer, C; Büchele, T; Haag, C; Hartmann, JT; Hofheinz, RD; Jäger, E; Kanz, L; Niederle, N; Oechsle, K; Pflüger, KH; Reis, HE; Wilke, HJ, 2004
)
2.03
"Irinotecan has been shown to exhibit excellent antitumor activity against SCLC in monotherapy regimens and in combination with cisplatin."( Topoisomerase I inhibitors in small-cell lung cancer. The Japanese experience.
Horiike, A; Saijo, N, 2004
)
1.04
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been shown to exhibit excellent antitumour activity against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). "( Multi-institutional phase II trial of irinotecan, cisplatin, and etoposide for sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer.
Goto, K; Kakinuma, R; Kodama, T; Kubota, K; Kunitoh, H; Matsui, K; Matsumoto, T; Niho, S; Nishiwaki, Y; Nokihara, H; Ohe, Y; Ohmatsu, H; Saijo, N; Sekine, I; Shinkai, T; Sugiura, T; Tamura, T; Yamamoto, N; Yoshida, K, 2004
)
2.04
"Irinotecan (Camptosar) has shown promising single-agent activity in a number of gastrointestinal cancers, including colorectal, pancreatic, and esophagogastric cancer."( Phase II trial of weekly irinotecan/cisplatin in advanced esophageal cancer.
Ilson, DH, 2004
)
1.35
"Irinotecan has many acute adverse effects."( Benefit-risk assessment of irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer.
Glimelius, B, 2005
)
1.35
"Irinotecan HCl (CPT-11) has frequently been used in chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced cervical cancer, although an effective protocol for chemoradiotherapy with CPT-11 has not yet been established. "( Combination effects of irradiation and irinotecan on cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro.
Tanaka, T; Umesaki, N; Yukawa, K, 2005
)
2.04
"Irinotecan has recently been found to be one of the most active agents in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). "( Evolving role of irinotecan in small-cell lung cancer.
Greco, FA; Spigel, DR, 2003
)
2.1
"Irinotecan has shown improved survival in patients who had previously failed 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy in phase II and III trials."( Second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Lepere, C; Rougier, P, 2005
)
1.05
"Irinotecan has demonstrated broad activity in a variety of epithelial malignancies."( A phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with previously untreated advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma.
Clark, JW; Earle, CC; Enzinger, PC; Fuchs, CS; Kim, H; Kulke, MH; Mayer, RJ; Michelini, AL; Ryan, DP; Vincitore, MM, 2005
)
1.37
"Irinotecan/cisplatin have been shown to be superior to a standard treatment with etoposide/cisplatin in extensive disease SCLC."( Simultaneous chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin in limited disease small cell lung cancer: a phase I study.
Büscher, C; Fähndrich, S; Fietkau, R; Klautke, G; Semrau, S; Virchow, C, 2006
)
1.33
"Irinotecan has an acceptable tolerability profile and is not associated with cumulative toxicities in patients with metastatic CRC; regimens containing irinotecan extend treatment duration and improve survival."( Irinotecan in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Fuchs, C; Hoff, PM; Mitchell, EP, 2006
)
2.5
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been tested as a single agent in several studies, and response rates of 18-23% have been reported in first-line gastric cancer therapy. "( Irinotecan, fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFIRI) as effective treatment combination for patients with advanced gastric cancer in poor clinical condition.
Bajetta, E; Beretta, E; Buzzoni, R; Di Bartolomeo, M; Ferrario, E; Gevorgyan, A; Mariani, L,
)
3.02
"Irinotecan (CPT11) has been evaluated in multiple trials alone or in combined therapy with promising results and good tolerance."( A general review of the role of irinotecan (CPT11) in the treatment of gastric cancer.
Farhat, FS, 2007
)
1.34
"Irinotecan has been introduced to improve the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). "( Phase II study of a 3-week schedule of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Jung, SS; Kim, JO; Kim, SY; Lee, JE; Park, HS, 2007
)
2.05
"Irinotecan has activity in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. "( Irinotecan is an active agent in untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chou, TC; Conti, JA; Gonzalez, C; Huang, Y; Kemeny, NE; Pulliam, S; Saltz, LB; Sun, M; Tong, WP, 1996
)
3.18
"Irinotecan has significant single-agent activity against colorectal cancer that has progressed during or shortly after treatment with 5-FU-based chemotherapy. "( Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with progressive or rapidly recurrent colorectal cancer.
Burris, HA; Eckardt, JR; Eckhardt, SG; Elfring, GL; Hilsenbeck, SG; Kuhn, JG; Nelson, J; Rinaldi, DA; Rodriguez, GI; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Smith, LS; Thurman, AM; Von Hoff, DD; Weiss, GR, 1996
)
2.07
"Irinotecan has established the single-agent efficacy on both gastric and colorectal cancer."( New systemic drugs in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.
Ogawa, M, 1996
)
1.02
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been reported to be cytotoxic to tumor cells through its inhibitory activity on type I DNA topoisomerase. "( Induction of tumor necrosis factor by a camptothecin derivative, irinotecan, in mice and human mononuclear cells.
Goto, S; Kera, J; Okutomi, T; Soma, G; Suma, Y; Takeuchi, S,
)
1.81
"Irinotecan has shown activity in leukaemia, lymphoma and the following cancer sites: colorectum, lung, ovary, cervix, pancreas, stomach and breast."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.
Chabot, GG, 1997
)
1.31
"Irinotecan has significant activity in patients with 5-FU-refractory colorectal cancer. "( Irinotecan hydrochloride: drug profile and nursing implications of a topoisomerase I inhibitor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Berg, D, 1998
)
3.19
"Irinotecan has been approved in Japan, France and USA, however, its clinical usefulness seems to be differently understood. "( [New cancer therapies: balancing risk and benefit].
Rothenberg, ML, 1998
)
1.74
"Irinotecan has been explored as a single agent in patients with newly diagnosed CRC and has generated response rates in the range of 19% to 32% and a median survival time of approximately 12 months, suggesting a level of antitumor activity similar to that observed with 5-FU and leucovorin."( Efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan in patients with colorectal cancer.
Rothenberg, ML, 1998
)
1.32
"Irinotecan only has been evaluated prospectively in phase III studies."( [Second-line irinotecan chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancers: phase III trials].
Ducreux, M; Mitry, E; Rougier, P, 1998
)
1.39
"Irinotecan also has been used in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents."( Docetaxel and irinotecan, alone and in combination, in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
Adjei, AA; Argiris, A; Murren, JR, 1999
)
1.39
"Irinotecan has appeared to have significant activity against previously treated and untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). "( Irinotecan in small-cell lung cancer--Japanese trials.
Fukuoka, M; Kudoh, S; Masuda, N; Negoro, S, 2000
)
3.19
"Irinotecan (Camptosar) has shown activity in several solid tumor malignancies, including gastric and pancreatic cancer. "( Irinotecan in esophageal cancer.
Enzinger, PC; Ilson, DH, 2000
)
3.19
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been used recently for the treatment of several cancers in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). "( Comparisons of the pharmacokinetics and the leukopenia and thrombocytopenia grade after administration of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in combination to rats.
Kiba, T; Nakaoka, M; Numata, K; Saito, T; Sekihara, H; Shintani, S; Umezawa, T,
)
1.79
"Irinotecan (CPT11) has established activity in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer without cross-resistance with established 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid-based therapy. "( Prospective phase II trial of iriontecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in combination as salvage therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Adam, R; Bismuth, H; Castaing, D; Coeffic, D; Durrani, AK; Gil-Delgado, MA; Guinet, F; Khayat, D, 2001
)
1.75
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) has shown considerable activity in colorectal cancer, and its combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) represents an attractive approach. "( A dose-finding study of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus a four-day continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion in advanced colorectal cancer.
Androulakis, N; Georgoulias, V; Kakolyris, S; Kalbakis, K; Kotsakis, A; Koukourakis, M; Kouroussis, C; Mavroudis, D; Romanos, J; Souglakos, J; Vardakis, N, 2001
)
2.06
"Irinotecan has not yet been fully tested in this disease."( A phase II trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) for unresectable biliary tree carcinoma.
Kemeny, NE; O'Reilly, E; Raeburn, L; Saltz, LB; Sanz-Altamira, PM; Steger, C; Stuart, KE, 2001
)
1.36
"Irinotecan has minimal activity in biliary tree carcinomas, but is well tolerated with appropriate supportive care, and produces occasional objective responses."( A phase II trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) for unresectable biliary tree carcinoma.
Kemeny, NE; O'Reilly, E; Raeburn, L; Saltz, LB; Sanz-Altamira, PM; Steger, C; Stuart, KE, 2001
)
2.08

Actions

Irinotecan can cause high levels of diarrhea caused by toxic injury to the gastrointestinal microenvironment. Irinotecen plays an important part in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. It increases mucin secretion and a net decrease in mucin-producing goblet cells.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Irinotecan can cause high levels of diarrhea caused by toxic injury to the gastrointestinal microenvironment. "( Intestinal toll-like receptor 4 knockout alters the functional capacity of the gut microbiome following irinotecan treatment.
Bowen, JM; Coller, JK; Crame, EE; Gibson, RJ; Secombe, KR; Tam, JSY; Wardill, HR, 2022
)
2.38
"Irinotecan did not increase the number of TUNEL-positive cells and did not affect the population of propidium iodide (PI)-positive and annexin V-negative cells, corresponding to primary necrosis, or that of PI-positive and annexin-positive cells, corresponding to late apoptosis/secondary necrosis, in either of the two cell lines."( Irinotecan induces cell cycle arrest, but not apoptosis or necrosis, in Caco-2 and CW2 colorectal cancer cell lines.
Kaku, Y; Kanno, T; Nishizaki, T; Tsuchiya, A, 2015
)
2.58
"Irinotecan causes an increase in mucin secretion and a net decrease in mucin-producing goblet cells, and the expression of Muc2 and Muc4 in the gastrointestinal tract is altered following treatment. "( Irinotecan-induced mucositis is associated with changes in intestinal mucins.
Bowen, JM; Gibson, RJ; Keefe, DM; Laurence, J; Logan, RM; Stringer, AM; Yeoh, AS, 2009
)
3.24
"Irinotecan plays now an important part in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer."( [Irinotecan in combination for colon cancer].
André, T; de Gramond, A; Ducreux, M; Gil-Delgado, M; Khayat, D; Ychou, M, 1998
)
1.93

Treatment

Irinotecan treatment was highly effective in a preclinical model of human MTC, resulting in complete remission in 100% of the xenografts treated. IrinOTecan-treated patients had significantly prolonged survival, improved quality of life, and better control of disease-related symptoms.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"In irinotecan-treated rats, ∼2-fold increases in Pept1 protein levels were observed in all three segments, whereas mRNA levels remained unchanged."( Irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal damage alters the expression of peptide transporter 1 and absorption of cephalexin in rats.
Akiyoshi, T; Hattori, T; Imaoka, A; Ohtani, H, 2023
)
2.87
"The irinotecan-treated group showed statistically significant shortening and thinning of the lingual papillae."( Effect of irinotecan on the tongue mucosa of juvenile male albino rat at adulthood.
Elwan, WM; Ibrahim, MAAH, 2019
)
1.4
"Irinotecan treats a range of solid tumors, but its effectiveness is severely limited by gastrointestinal (GI) tract toxicity caused by gut bacterial β-glucuronidase (GUS) enzymes. "( Targeted inhibition of gut bacterial β-glucuronidase activity enhances anticancer drug efficacy.
Azcarate-Peril, MA; Bailey, ST; Bhatt, AP; Biernat, KA; Bultman, SJ; Creekmore, BC; Darr, DB; Gharaibeh, RZ; Letertre, MM; Montgomery, SA; Pellock, SJ; Redinbo, MR; Roach, JM; Roques, JR; Sartor, RB; Swann, JR; Wallace, BD; Walton, WG; Wilson, ID, 2020
)
2
"In irinotecan-treated patients, T allele of ABCB1C1236T SNP was associated with a lower risk of asthenia(OR = 0.047; 95 % CI = 0.004–0.493; P = 0.011) and Tallele of ABCB1 C3435T SNP was associated with a lower risk of diarrhea (OR = 0.177; 95 % CI = 0.034–0.919;P = 0.039), and individuals with two copies of GSTT1 gene had a lower risk for asthenia (OR = 0.093; 95 %CI = 0.011–0.794; P = 0.030). "( Differential toxicity biomarkers for irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.
Cortejoso, L; Escolar, F; García, MI; García-Alfonso, P; González-Haba, E; López-Fernández, LA; Sanjurjo, M, 2013
)
1.28
"Irinotecan treatment is associated with mucositis, which clearly limits the use of the drug."( Inflammasome activation is reactive oxygen species dependent and mediates irinotecan-induced mucositis through IL-1β and IL-18 in mice.
Arifa, RD; de Paula, TP; Fagundes, CT; Lima, RL; Madeira, MF; Menezes-Garcia, Z; Rachid, MA; Ryffel, B; Souza, DG; Tavares, LD; Teixeira, MM; Zamboni, DS, 2014
)
1.35
"Irinotecan, a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and an agent with high activity against solid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, is an inhibitor of topoisomerase I, a critical enzyme needed for DNA transcription."( Experience with irinotecan for the treatment of malignant glioma.
Desjardins, A; Friedman, HS; Reardon, DA; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2009
)
1.42
"Irinotecan (CPT11) treatment significantly improves the survival of colorectal cancer patients and is routinely used for the treatment of these patients, alone or in combination with other agents. "( Aprataxin tumor levels predict response of colorectal cancer patients to irinotecan-based treatment.
Arango, D; Armengol, M; Bazzocco, S; Carreras, MJ; Dopeso, H; Elez, E; Espín, E; Hernández-Losa, J; Landolfi, S; Mariadason, JM; Mateo-Lozano, S; Mazzolini, R; Ramon Y Cajal, S; Ramos Pascual, FJ; Rodrigues, P; Schwartz, S; Tabernero, J; Wilson, AJ, 2010
)
2.03
"Irinotecan-treated patients were genotyped for the MBL2 gene. "( Effects of mannose-binding lectin polymorphisms on irinotecan-induced febrile neutropenia.
de Jong, FA; Mathijssen, RH; Sleijfer, S; Sparreboom, A; van Daele, PL; van de Geijn, FE; van der Bol, JM; van Fessem, MA; van Schaik, RH; Verweij, J, 2010
)
2.06
"Irinotecan treated rats were administrated irinotecan 250 mg/kg intraperitoneally on days designated 0 and 1, were then killed at 48 h after treatment, and tissues were collected for analysis."( Irinotecan injures tight junction and causes bacterial translocation in rat.
Iwata, T; Komatsu, M; Kurita, N; Nakao, T; Shimada, M; Utusnomiya, T; Yoshikawa, K, 2012
)
2.54
"In irinotecan treated rats, claudin-1 mRNA of the small intestine decreased (P < 0.05), claudin-1 mRNA of large intestine had a tendency to decrease (P = 0.05), occludin mRNA of both small and large intestine decreased (P < 0.05)."( Irinotecan injures tight junction and causes bacterial translocation in rat.
Iwata, T; Komatsu, M; Kurita, N; Nakao, T; Shimada, M; Utusnomiya, T; Yoshikawa, K, 2012
)
2.34
"Irinotecan, now used for treatments of many cancers, is metabolically activated to SN-38 and then inactivated to SN-38 glucuronide by a UDP-glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1."( [Pharmacogenomic research for avoiding adverse reactions by anti-cancer drugs].
Saito, Y, 2011
)
1.09
"Irinotecan treatment resulted in a suppression of tumor growth. "( Pharmacodynamic evaluation of irinotecan therapy by FDG and FLT PET/CT imaging in a colorectal cancer xenograft model.
Bukofzer, G; Chakravartty, A; Cole, TB; Day, M; Donawho, CK; Fox, GB; Holich, KD; Luo, Y; Mudd, SR; Palma, JP; Reuter, DR; Tapang, P; Voorbach, MJ, 2012
)
2.11
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) treatments induce severe diarrhoea at a rate of >40%. "( Prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhoea by oral carbonaceous adsorbent (Kremezin) in cancer patients.
Kiribayashi, Y; Maeda, Y; Murakami, T; Nakamura, M; Ohune, T; Yamasaki, M, 2004
)
2.13
"Irinotecan-treated patients received a mean of 8 different comedications and oxaliplatin-treated patients received a mean of 6."( Classification and occurrence of clinically significant drug interactions with irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Brouwers, JR; Coenen, JL; de Graaf, JC; Idzinga, FS; Jansman, FG; Sleijfer, DT; Smit, WM, 2005
)
1.28
"Irinotecan treatment also induced in mouse tumours derived from the p53(wt) cell lines a tetraploid G1 arrest and in those derived from the p53-deficient cell lines a transient G2/M arrest and apoptosis."( Equivalent effect of DNA damage-induced apoptotic cell death or long-term cell cycle arrest on colon carcinoma cell proliferation and tumour growth.
Bhonde, MR; Daniel, PT; Gillissen, BF; Hanski, C; Hanski, ML; Notter, M; Zeitz, M, 2006
)
1.06
"Irinotecan treatment was highly effective in a preclinical model of human MTC, resulting in complete remission in 100% of the xenografts treated. "( Activity of irinotecan and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor CEP-751 in medullary thyroid cancer.
Ball, DW; Denmeade, SR; Nelkin, BD; Park, JI; Rosen, DM; Ruggeri, B; Strock, CJ, 2006
)
2.16
"Irinotecan treatment of colorectal cancers results in high-grade intestinal mucositis in a large proportion of patients. "( Role of p53 in irinotecan-induced intestinal cell death and mucosal damage.
Bowen, JM; Chan, TW; Cummins, AG; Gibson, RJ; Keefe, DM; Prabowo, AS; Stringer, AM, 2007
)
2.14
"Irinotecan-treated patients had significantly prolonged survival, improved quality of life, and better control of disease-related symptoms."( Irinotecan: toward clinical end points in drug development.
Pazdur, R, 1998
)
2.46
"Irinotecan treated patients lived for significantly longer than those on 5FU: median time of survival was 10.8 months versus 8.5 months (p = 0.035)."( [Second-line irinotecan chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancers: phase III trials].
Ducreux, M; Mitry, E; Rougier, P, 1998
)
1.39
"Irinotecan treatment was repeated in approximately 6 week cycles consisting of the administration of irinotecan once weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2 week rest."( Clinical effect of irinotecan in advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with doxorubicin- and docetaxel-containing regimens.
Fujii, H; Igarashi, T; Imoto, S; Ishizawa, K; Itoh, K; Minami, H; Saeki, T; Sasaki, Y; Shigeoka, Y, 2001
)
1.36
"Treatment with irinotecan significantly inhibited cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis, TRIM9 expression, intestinal mucosal barrier impairment, the levels of inflammatory cytokines and P38 phosphorylation in IEC‑6 cells, while the expression levels of epithelial barrier tight‑junction protein ZO‑1 and Claudin‑4 were decreased."( Knockdown of TRIM9 attenuates irinotecan‑induced intestinal mucositis in IEC‑6 cells by regulating DUSP6 expression via the P38 pathway.
Wang, Q; Zhao, W, 2021
)
1.25
"Co-treatment with irinotecan and ATP-competitive AKT inhibitor GSK690693 significantly reduced colon cancer cell survival and tumor progression rates."( AKT inhibition sensitizes EVI1 expressing colon cancer cells to irinotecan therapy by regulating the Akt/mTOR axis.
Chakraborty, S; Senapati, S; Suresh, V, 2022
)
1.28
"The treatment of irinotecan with combining ellagic acid enhanced antitumor activity and the synergistic effect of these reduced the cell proliferation of C6 glioma by inhibiting the cadherin switch and promoting the antiangiogenic processes."( Antitumor activity of irinotecan with ellagic acid in C6 glioma cells.
Biltekin, B; Cetin, A; Ozevren, H, 2022
)
1.38
"Treatment with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU inhibited proliferation and metabolic activity as well as clonogenic survival and the DNA damage repair capacity of the tumor cells."( Radiosensitizing Effects of Irinotecan versus Oxaliplatin Alone and in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil on Human Colorectal Cancer Cells.
Bock, F; Cappel, ML; Frerker, B; Hildebrandt, G; Klautke, G; Kriesen, S; Manda, K, 2023
)
1.54
"Treatment with irinotecan is often accompanied by severe toxicity (e.g."( Irinotecan toxicity during treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: focus on pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.
Filip, S; Nekvindová, J; Paulík, A, 2020
)
2.34
"Treatment with irinotecan or etoposide did not significantly influence cellular adhesion, migratory ability, surface marker expression or induction of apoptosis in human MSCs."( Mesenchymal stem cells exhibit resistance to topoisomerase inhibition.
Debus, J; Ho, AD; Huber, PE; Nicolay, NH; Perez, RL; Rühle, A; Saffrich, R; Schmezer, P; Sisombath, S; Trinh, T; Weber, KJ, 2016
)
0.77
"Mice treated with Irinotecan presented less melanoma tumor growth compared to the control group."( The reduction of oxidative stress by nanocomposite Fullerol decreases mucositis severity and reverts leukopenia induced by Irinotecan.
Arifa, RDN; Barcelos, LS; Garcia, ZM; Krambrock, K; Ladeira, LO; Lima, RL; Madeira, MFM; Paula, TP; Pinheiro, MVB; Pinho, V; Souza, DG; Teixeira, MM; Ÿvila, TV, 2016
)
0.96
"Treatment with irinotecan was significantly associated with an increase in the incidence of steatohepatitis, but did not increase the morbidity or mortality. "( [Influence of pre-surgical chemotherapy on liver parenchyma and post-surgical outcome of patients subjected to hepatectomy due to colorectal carcinoma metastases].
Amat, CG; Bermejo, E; Gómez-Ramírez, J; Larrañaga, E; Martín-Pérez, E; Rodríguez, A; Sanz, IG, 2010
)
0.71
"Treatment was irinotecan 350 mg/m2, i.v., day 1, alternating with leucovorin 20 mg/m2 i.v."( A phase II study of irinotecan alternated with five days bolus of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Barone, C; Cognetti, F; Cote, C; Dirix, L; Filez, L; Garufi, C; Gruia, G; Humblet, Y; Pozzo, C; Starkhammar, H; Terzoli, E; Van Cutsem, E, 1998
)
0.97

Toxicity

There have been no case reports of the risk of serious adverse events associated with the administration of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in patients with gynecologic cancer. The majority of the toxic manifestation is caused by the insufficient deactivation (glucuronidation) of the irinOTecan active metabolite SN-38 by UGT1A enzyme.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The principal adverse events of CPT-11 are neutropenia and delayed diarrhea, which in the European studies developed as grade 3 or 4 toxicity in 21% and 12% of the cycles (47% and 38% of patients), respectively."( CPT-11 in the treatment of colorectal cancer: clinical efficacy and safety profile.
Bugat, R; Rougier, P, 1996
)
0.29
" In a pivotal French study in which CPT-11 350 mg/m2 was administered once every 3 weeks, neutropenia and delayed diarrhoea were the major adverse events: transient neutropenia occurred in 80% of patients, and severe neutropenia and febrile neutropenia in 47 and 15%, respectively."( Characterisation and clinical management of CPT-11 (irinotecan)-induced adverse events: the European perspective.
Bleiberg, H; Cvitkovic, E, 1996
)
0.54
" These data show that oral administration of JBT 3002 can prevent irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal toxic effects and maintain the integrity of the lamina propria, thus allowing for intensification of irinotecan therapy against liver metastases from colon cancer."( Prevention of intestinal toxic effects and intensification of irinotecan's therapeutic efficacy against murine colon cancer liver metastases by oral administration of the lipopeptide JBT 3002.
Fidler, IJ; Killion, JJ; Kumar, R; Kuniyasu, H; Shinohara, H, 1998
)
0.78
" Participation by both the oncology care team and patients is crucial for effective side effect management."( Managing the side effects of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.
Berg, D, 1998
)
0.3
" Delayed diarrhea and neutropenia are the most common toxic side effects, both of which can usually be predicted, by knowing the criteria for patients who are at increased risk for those side effects."( Colorectal cancer: dilemmas regarding patient selection and toxicity prediction.
Jelic, S; Nikolic-Tomasevic, Z; Popov, I; Radosavljevic, D, 2000
)
0.31
" In an interim analysis of nine patients, thalidomide had almost eliminated the dose-limiting gastrointestinal toxic effects of irinotecan, especially diarrhoea and nausea (each p<0."( Effect of thalidomide on gastrointestinal toxic effects of irinotecan.
Broadwater, R; Govindarajan, R; Hauer-Jensen, M; Heaton, KM; Lang, NP; Zeitlin, A, 2000
)
0.76
" As the clinical indications for the use of this agent expand, we describe irinotecan-associated interstitial pneumonitis as a serious potential adverse effect."( Irinotecan-associated pulmonary toxicity.
Bjarnason, GA; Madarnas, Y; Shorter, AM; Webster, P, 2000
)
1.98
" The most common treatment-related adverse events reported during therapy with IMC-C225 were an acne-like rash and hypersensitivity reactions."( Safety experience with IMC-C225, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody.
Needle, MN, 2002
)
0.31
" Thus we sought to determine in a rat model whether extending the period of infusion of CPT-11 would ameliorate the adverse reactions."( Alleviation of side effects induced by irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in rats by intravenous infusion.
Hashimoto, S; Kado, S; Kaneda, N; Kurita, A; Onoue, M; Yokokura, T, 2003
)
0.59
" The pharmacokinetic parameters suggested that the Cmax of CPT-11 is closely related to the incidence and severity of adverse reactions such as myelosuppression and acute and delayed-onset diarrhea."( Alleviation of side effects induced by irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in rats by intravenous infusion.
Hashimoto, S; Kado, S; Kaneda, N; Kurita, A; Onoue, M; Yokokura, T, 2003
)
0.59
" Oral administration of RDP58 significantly decreased the incidence of diarrhea and improved the survival rates of mice treated with toxic doses of CPT-11 or 5-fluorouracil."( Oral RDP58 allows CPT-11 dose intensification for enhanced tumor response by decreasing gastrointestinal toxicity.
Belmar, N; Buelow, R; Fong, T; Huang, L; Zhao, J, 2004
)
0.32
"We wanted to assess polymorphisms in the uridine diphosphoglucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT 1A1) gene: the TATA box polymorphism and UGT 1A1 G71R and Y486D mutations in the coding sequence, the main mutations characterizing Gilbert's syndrome, as predictors of severe toxic event occurrence after irinotecan (CPT-11) administration."( Relevance of different UGT1A1 polymorphisms in irinotecan-induced toxicity: a molecular and clinical study of 75 patients.
Boisdron-Celle, M; Dumont, A; Gamelin, E; Guérin, O; Morel, A; Rouits, E, 2004
)
0.76
" The most frequent toxic effects were grade 3/4 diarrhea (arm A: 34%, B: 19%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (A: 5%, B: 19%) and grade 2/3 alopecia (A: 26%, B: 65%)."( A randomized phase II trial of capecitabine and two different schedules of irinotecan in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: efficacy, quality-of-life and toxicity.
Bernhard, J; Borner, MM; Brauchli, P; Dietrich, D; Herrmann, R; Honegger, H; Koeberle, D; Lanz, D; Popescu, R; Rauch, D; Roth, AD; Saletti, P; Wernli, M, 2005
)
0.56
" As a side effect of the therapy, a follicular rash often develops in the seborrheic areas; this cutaneous reaction is associated with longer survival."( [Follicular drug reaction from cetuximab: a common side effect in the treatment of metastatic colon carcinoma].
Braun-Falco, M; Holtmann, C; Lordick, F; Ring, J, 2006
)
0.33
"These findings, combined with the observation of clinical activity and grade 3/4 neutropenia in 25% of patients, suggest that combining chrysin with CPT-11 may be a safe and potentially useful means of preventing diarrhoea, although this needs to be further investigated in the setting of a randomised trial."( A pilot study on the safety of combining chrysin, a non-absorbable inducer of UGT1A1, and irinotecan (CPT-11) to treat metastatic colorectal cancer.
Beale, P; Clarke, S; Liddell, S; Noney, L; Rivory, LP; Tobin, PJ, 2006
)
0.55
"Irinotecan hydrochloride shows much different responses in each patient, and it has severe adverse effects."( [Assessment of immunotoxicity of irinotecan determined by the novel method, by which productivity of TNF-alpha from whole blood is stimulated by lipopolysaccharide].
Araki, H; Ishizaki, M; Kamiyama, Y; Kawaguchi, Y; Komiyama, Y; Nakagawa, A; Nishimura, N; Takahashi, H, 2005
)
2.05
" Adverse effects associated with the Saltz regimen included diarrhea and neutropenia."( Concomitant administration of bevacizumab, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin: nonclinical safety and pharmacokinetics.
Bricarello, A; Christian, BJ; Gaudreault, J; Mounho, B; Shiu, V; Zuch, CL,
)
0.39
" It is experientially clear that inter-individual differences exist in the degree of efficacy and occurrence of adverse effects."( [SNPs associated with adverse effects].
Isomura, M; Miki, Y, 2005
)
0.33
"The weekly dosing schedule of irinotecan seems to be effective and safe salvage chemotherapy regimen for platinum- and taxanes-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer."( The safety and efficacy of the weekly dosing of irinotecan for platinum- and taxanes-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.
Andoh, M; Fujiwara, Y; Katsumata, N; Kohno, T; Matsumoto, K; Shimizu, C; Yamanaka, Y; Yonemori, K, 2006
)
0.88
" During the whole study period, the common grade 3/4 adverse events were acne-like rash (38%) and diarrhea (29%)."( Cetuximab and irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is a safe combination for the first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lutz, MP; Nolting, A; Pollert, P; Schöffski, P; Seufferlein, T, 2006
)
0.69
"Addition of cetuximab to weekly infusional 5-FU/FA plus irinotecan is safe and first data suggest a promising activity."( Cetuximab and irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is a safe combination for the first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lutz, MP; Nolting, A; Pollert, P; Schöffski, P; Seufferlein, T, 2006
)
0.94
"In the current Phase II study, the authors evaluated the association between genomic polymorphic variants in uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UGT1A1), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), and thymidylate synthase (TS) genes, and the incidence of the adverse effects of irinotecan and raltitrexed in previously heavily treated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma."( Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 promoter polymorphism predicts the risk of gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue induced by irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
Bisonni, R; Leon, A; Lippe, P; Lombardo, M; Marcucci, F; Massacesi, C; Mattioli, R; Pilone, A; Rocchi, MB; Terrazzino, S, 2006
)
0.71
" Nineteen variables related to patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, together with genotypes, were analyzed using a binary logistic regression model with stepwise selection to evaluate their correlation with adverse reactions."( Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 promoter polymorphism predicts the risk of gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue induced by irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
Bisonni, R; Leon, A; Lippe, P; Lombardo, M; Marcucci, F; Massacesi, C; Mattioli, R; Pilone, A; Rocchi, MB; Terrazzino, S, 2006
)
0.54
" MTHFR C677T polymorphism was not found to be associated with any adverse reaction."( Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 promoter polymorphism predicts the risk of gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue induced by irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
Bisonni, R; Leon, A; Lippe, P; Lombardo, M; Marcucci, F; Massacesi, C; Mattioli, R; Pilone, A; Rocchi, MB; Terrazzino, S, 2006
)
0.54
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
"Delayed diarrhea is the most important side effect of irinotecan."( Intestinal microflora and digestive toxicity of irinotecan in mice.
Biasco, G; Brandi, G; Bridonneau, C; Dabard, J; De Vivo, A; Di Battista, M; Morselli Labate, AM; Pantaleo, MA; Pisi, AM; Raibaud, P, 2006
)
0.84
"Our data show that whereas TRAIL alone or together with selected chemotherapeutic drugs seems to be safe, the combination of TRAIL with cisplatin is toxic to PHH."( Preclinical differentiation between apparently safe and potentially hepatotoxic applications of TRAIL either alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs.
Büchler, P; Ganten, TM; Haas, TL; Koschny, R; Schader, MB; Schulze-Bergkamen, H; Stremmel, W; Sykora, J; Untergasser, A; Walczak, H, 2006
)
0.33
" However, some nondermatologic adverse events can also be common."( Nondermatologic adverse events associated with anti-EGFR therapy.
Sandler, AB, 2006
)
0.33
"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved label changes for two anticancer drugs, 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and irinotecan, to include pharmacogenetic testing as a potential means to reduce the rate of severe toxic events."( TPMT, UGT1A1 and DPYD: genotyping to ensure safer cancer therapy?
Maitland, ML; Ratain, MJ; Vasisht, K, 2006
)
0.54
" Our data suggest that GSTT1-null is associated with a greater probability of developing toxicity to 5-Fu/CPT-11/Lv treatments, indicating a potential application of this genetic analysis in predicting adverse effects of this regimen."( Potential application of GSTT1-null genotype in predicting toxicity associated to 5-fluouracil irinotecan and leucovorin regimen in advanced stage colorectal cancer patients.
Aranda, E; Bandres, E; De la Haba, J; Garcia, F; García-Foncillas, J; Gómez, A; Huarriz, M; Morales, R; Romero, RZ, 2006
)
0.55
" End points included grade > or = 3 adverse events, response rate (in advanced disease), progression or relapse-free survival, dose-intensity, and overall survival in the studies with mature survival data."( Pooled analysis of safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin administered bimonthly in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.
Andre, T; Bleiberg, H; de Gramont, A; Goldberg, RM; Green, E; Rothenberg, ML; Sargent, DJ; Tabah-Fisch, I; Tournigand, C, 2006
)
0.33
" Older age was not associated with increased rates of severe neurologic adverse events, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, infection, overall incidence of grade > or = 3 toxicity (63% v 67%; P = ."( Pooled analysis of safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin administered bimonthly in elderly patients with colorectal cancer.
Andre, T; Bleiberg, H; de Gramont, A; Goldberg, RM; Green, E; Rothenberg, ML; Sargent, DJ; Tabah-Fisch, I; Tournigand, C, 2006
)
0.33
" We present a colon cancer patient with the UGT1A1 polymorphism (UGT1A1 *28) as a known high risk for irinotecan, who was treated with a combination of doxifluridine and irinotecan for peritoneal dissemination resulting in stable disease for 2 years without adverse reactions, although the patient initially developed severe adverse effects to the combination of the protracted venous infusion of 5-FU and irinotecan."( Irinotecan cytotoxicity does not necessarily depend on the UGT1A1 polymorphism but on fluoropyrimidine: a molecular case report.
Hiro, J; Inoue, Y; Kusunoki, M; Miki, C; Nakatani, K; Nobori, T; Ojima, E; Toiyama, Y; Watanabe, H, 2006
)
1.99
"9% toxic deaths."( Clinical predictors of severe toxicity in patients treated with combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer: a single center experience.
Aparicio, J; Díaz, R; Giménez, A; Gómez-Codina, J; Molina, J; Palomar, L; Ponce, J; Segura, A, 2006
)
0.55
" We conducted a study to identify a safe dose and potential drug-drug interactions of this combination."( Pharmacokinetic and safety study of weekly irinotecan and oral capecitabine in patients with advanced solid cancers.
Baker, S; Bulgaru, A; Camacho, F; Chaudhary, I; Desai, K; Einstein, M; Goel, S; Goldberg, G; Gollamudi, R; Karri, S; Kaubisch, A; Mani, S, 2007
)
0.6
" The combination of irinotecan and capecitabine is safe and well tolerated at 100/2000, and warrants further evaluation in ovarian and breast cancer."( Pharmacokinetic and safety study of weekly irinotecan and oral capecitabine in patients with advanced solid cancers.
Baker, S; Bulgaru, A; Camacho, F; Chaudhary, I; Desai, K; Einstein, M; Goel, S; Goldberg, G; Gollamudi, R; Karri, S; Kaubisch, A; Mani, S, 2007
)
0.93
" Since their adverse effects are not well elucidated, in this study the efficiency of HI-6 oxime in protection and/or reactivation of human erythrocyte AChE inhibited by the antineoplastic drug irinotecan as well as its cyto/genotoxicity in vitro were investigated."( Evaluation of HI-6 oxime: potential use in protection of human acetylcholinesterase inhibited by antineoplastic drug irinotecan and its cyto/genotoxicity in vitro.
Berend, S; Fuchs, N; Kopjar, N; Radić, B; Vrdoljak, AL; Zeljezić, D, 2007
)
0.74
" Main grade 3/4 toxic effects were, respectively, neutropenia 42."( A randomized phase II trial evaluating safety and efficacy of an experimental chemotherapy regimen (irinotecan + oxaliplatin, IRINOX) and two standard arms (LV5 FU2 + irinotecan or LV5 FU2 + oxaliplatin) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: a study
Adenis, A; Bécouarn, Y; Boucher, E; Cany, L; Cvitkovic, F; Jacob, JH; Montoto-Grillot, C; Senesse, P; Thézenas, S; Ychou, M, 2007
)
0.56
"Chemoradiotherapy of the last phase II study with intermittent capecitabine (1500 mg/m(2)/day, delivered on days 1-14 and 22-35) and irinotecan (4 x 60 mg/m(2)) concurrently to radiotherapy is a safe treatment with low toxicity and high efficacy."( Intensified irinotecan-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: four consecutive designed studies to minimize acute toxicity and to optimize efficacy measured by pathologic complete response.
Fietkau, R; Foitzik, T; Klar, E; Klautke, G; Küchenmeister, U; Ludwig, K; Prall, F; Semrau, S, 2007
)
0.92
" Administration of TroVax alongside chemotherapy was safe and well tolerated with no SAEs attributed to the vaccine and no enhancement of chemo-related toxicity."( Vaccination of colorectal cancer patients with TroVax given alongside chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, leukovorin and irinotecan) is safe and induces potent immune responses.
Carroll, MW; Chikoti, P; Drury, N; Griffiths, R; Harrop, R; Hawkins, RE; Kingsman, SM; Naylor, S; Redchenko, I; Shingler, W; Steven, N, 2008
)
0.56
"Genotyping of the UGT1A1*28, UGT1A7 N129K/R131K, and UGT1A7-57T/G variants was done in 105 irinotecan-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer; adverse events were documented during all 297 treatment cycles and analyzed by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, Mann-Whitney, and chi2 tests."( Gilbert's Syndrome and irinotecan toxicity: combination with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 variants increases risk.
Erichsen, TJ; Heinemann, V; Lankisch, TO; Manns, MP; Schulz, C; Strassburg, CP; Zwingers, T, 2008
)
0.88
"The presence of UGT1A7 but not UGT1A1 variants was associated with at least one adverse event."( Gilbert's Syndrome and irinotecan toxicity: combination with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 variants increases risk.
Erichsen, TJ; Heinemann, V; Lankisch, TO; Manns, MP; Schulz, C; Strassburg, CP; Zwingers, T, 2008
)
0.66
"An increase of sIL-2R, CD4+CD25+ T-cells and the CD4/8 ratio in patients with symptomatic adverse reactions were found."( Changes of immunological parameters reflect quality of life-related toxicity during chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Aizawa, M; Fujimoto, T; Itagaki, H; Kobayashi, R; Kuhara, K; Ogawa, K; Osawa, G; Otani, T; Yokomizo, H; Yoshimatsu, K,
)
0.13
" Evaluation points included adverse events, dose intensity, response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival."( Safety of irinotecan and infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in Japan: a retrospective review of 48 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Asaka, M; Doi, T; Fuse, N; Hamamoto, Y; Minashi, K; Muto, M; Ohtsu, A; Tahara, M; Yano, T; Yoshida, S, 2008
)
0.75
" However, translation to clinical practice of UGT1A1*28 testing as a predictive marker of adverse effects needs to be further investigated and the available data are not conclusive in defining a precise genotype-based dosage."( UGT1A1*28 and other UGT1A polymorphisms as determinants of irinotecan toxicity.
Biason, P; Masier, S; Toffoli, G, 2008
)
0.59
" Many drugs have been used for the treatment of this disease, but there is little information about how predictive factors can be used to aid treatment response and anticipate toxic effects related to anticancer treatment in colorectal cancer."( Predictive factors for chemotherapy-related toxic effects in patients with colorectal cancer.
Pantano, F; Santini, D; Schiavon, G; Tonini, G; Vincenzi, B, 2008
)
0.35
"The toxicity of irinotecan is predictable, manageable and nonadditive in the majority of patients; however, with its increasing use alone and in combination with other agents and modalities, the recognition and control of these adverse effects remain a clinical challenge."( Irinotecan toxicity.
Anthony, L, 2007
)
2.13
"76%) discontinued treatment due to a treatment-emergent adverse event, including one with end-stage renal failure and another with gastric perforation."( Efficacy, safety and patterns of response and recurrence in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan.
Anderson, J; Doyle, T; Ellika, S; Jain, R; Mikkelsen, T; Schultz, L; Torcuator, R; Zuniga, RM, 2009
)
0.56
"We report a successful case of chemotherapy accompanied with grade 4 adverse events for unresectable advanced gastric cancer."( [A case of unresectable advanced gastric cancer successfully treated with continuous S-1 + CPT-11 chemotherapy accompanied by dose reduction against grade 4 hematological adverse event].
Furukawa, H; Imamura, H; Kishimoto, T; Miyazaki, Y; Ota, K; Tatsuta, M, 2008
)
0.35
" The most important adverse event was abdominal pain."( TACE of liver metastases from colorectal cancer adopting irinotecan-eluting beads: beneficial effect of palliative intra-arterial lidocaine and post-procedure supportive therapy on the control of side effects.
Aliberti, C; Ballardini, PL; Benea, G; Cantore, M; Fiorentini, G; Mambrini, A; Montagnani, F,
)
0.38
" All pharmacologic agents in current use have been associated with adverse events."( Toxic effects and their management: daily clinical challenges in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Eng, C, 2009
)
0.35
" Major adverse events were neutropenia, nausea, diarrhea, hand/foot syndrome, and neurotoxicity."( Efficacy and safety of capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination as second-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.
Hatzopoulos, A; Heras, P; Karagiannis, S; Kritikos, K; Kritikos, N; Mitsibounas, D; Xourafas, V,
)
0.13
"In this large pooled analysis, we found MMC, when capped at a cumulative dose of 36 mg/m(2), to be safe and tolerable in combination with capecitabine or irinotecan with no reportable cases of TTP/HUS."( Capped-dose mitomycin C: a pooled safety analysis from three prospective clinical trials.
Arce-Lara, C; Bekaii-Saab, T; Cataland, S; Kraut, E; Ntukidem, N; Otterson, GA, 2010
)
0.56
" The most common adverse events were leukopenia (73."( [Efficacy and safety of combination of irinotecan and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of chemotherapy with oxaliplatin].
Bai, CM; Chen, SC; Cheng, YJ; Jia, N; Shao, YJ; Zhou, JF, 2009
)
0.62
" This suggests that the bilirubin level may be an indicator of the adverse effects caused by CPT- 11."( [Assessment of total bilirubin or SN-38/SN-38G ratio as a predictor of severe irinotecan toxicity].
Harada, M; Isobe, H; Izumi, K; Mino, K; Saito, K; Tanaka, H, 2009
)
0.58
" The primary toxicity outcome measure was toxicity-induced delay or dose reduction; the secondary outcome was Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events grade >or= 3 toxicity."( Association of molecular markers with toxicity outcomes in a randomized trial of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: the FOCUS trial.
Adlard, JW; Allan, JM; Braun, MS; Daly, CL; Meade, AM; Parmar, MK; Quirke, P; Richman, SD; Seymour, MT; Thompson, L, 2009
)
0.35
" Propolis preparation and related flavonoids were found to exhibit an important immunomodulatory effect and could decrease irinotecan-induced toxic and genotoxic effects to normal cells without effecting irinotecan cytotoxicity in EAT cells."( Protective effects of propolis and related polyphenolic/flavonoid compounds against toxicity induced by irinotecan.
Benković, V; Dikić, D; Erhardt, J; Knežević, AH; Lisičić, D; Oršolić, N, 2010
)
0.78
" Secondly, the efficacy and safety disparity of clopidogrel, statins and irinotecan each among races and genetic variants are discussed to illustrate that pharmacogenetic knowledge is important for the interpretation and prediction of drug interaction-induced adverse events, whereas drug interaction -induced adverse events are equally informative for identifying genes-based mechanisms involved."( Ongoing challenges in drug interaction safety: from exposure to pharmacogenomics.
Bai, JP, 2010
)
0.59
"The addition of cetuximab to chronotherapy allowed safe and effective therapeutic control of metastases, including their complete resection, despite previous failure of several treatment regimens."( Cetuximab and circadian chronomodulated chemotherapy as salvage treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): safety, efficacy and improved secondary surgical resectability.
Adam, R; Bouchahda, M; Giacchetti, S; Gorden, L; Guettier, C; Hauteville, D; Innominato, PF; Karaboué, A; Lévi, F; Saffroy, R, 2011
)
0.37
" Patients treated with irinotecan occasionally experience severe neutropenia and delayed diarrhea, and the occurrence of these adverse reactions is unpredictable and still largely unexplained."( Pharmacogenetics of irinotecan disposition and toxicity: a review.
Fujita, K; Sparreboom, A, 2010
)
0.99
"The progression-free rates confirm that cetuximab q2w in combination with irinotecan is an option, and is as active and safe as the standard weekly regimen."( Cetuximab given every 2 weeks plus irinotecan is an active and safe option for previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alonso, V; Antón, I; Arrivi, A; Cirera, L; Constenla, M; Escudero, P; García, P; Grande, C; Guasch, I; López, LJ; Losa, F; Martin, C; Méndez, M; Moreno, I; Pericay, C; Quintero-Aldana, G; Roca, JM; Salud, A; Vicente, P; Yubero, A, 2010
)
0.87
" The main adverse effects associated with the treatment included leucopenia, nausea/vomiting and peripheral neuritis."( [Short-term therapeutic effect and safety of endostar combined with XELIRI regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer].
Liao, WJ; Luo, RC; Shen, P; Shi, M; Wu, Wy, 2010
)
0.36
"Endostar combined with XELIRI is effective and safe as the second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, and further clinical investigation is warranted."( [Short-term therapeutic effect and safety of endostar combined with XELIRI regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer].
Liao, WJ; Luo, RC; Shen, P; Shi, M; Wu, Wy, 2010
)
0.36
" There were 35 patients (19%) with irinotecan treatments who sustained 158 treatment-related adverse events, with the median CTCAE event grade being CTCAE grade 2 (range 1 to 5)."( Toxicity of irinotecan-eluting beads in the treatment of hepatic malignancies: results of a multi-institutional registry.
Bosnjakovic, PM; Howard, J; Martin, RC; Padr, R; Robbins, K; Tatum, C; Tomalty, D, 2010
)
1.02
"DEBIRI is safe when appropriate technique and treatment are used."( Toxicity of irinotecan-eluting beads in the treatment of hepatic malignancies: results of a multi-institutional registry.
Bosnjakovic, PM; Howard, J; Martin, RC; Padr, R; Robbins, K; Tatum, C; Tomalty, D, 2010
)
0.74
" No hematologic or non-hematologic toxic effects were clearly related to UGT1A1*1/*6 or *1/*28 during the first cycle or throughout the entire course of chemotherapy."( UGT1A1*1/*28 and *1/*6 genotypes have no effects on the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFIRI in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Akiyama, Y; Ando, Y; Araki, K; Fujita, K; Hirose, T; Ichikawa, W; Ishida, H; Kawara, K; Miwa, K; Miya, T; Mizuno, K; Nagashima, F; Narabayashi, M; Saji, S; Sasaki, Y; Sunakawa, Y; Yamamoto, W; Yamashita, K, 2011
)
0.37
"The dose-limiting side effect of the common colon cancer chemotherapeutic CPT-11 is severe diarrhea caused by symbiotic bacterial β-glucuronidases that reactivate the drug in the gut."( Alleviating cancer drug toxicity by inhibiting a bacterial enzyme.
Jobin, C; Koo, JS; Lane, KT; Mani, S; Orans, J; Redinbo, MR; Scott, JE; Venkatesh, M; Wallace, BD; Wang, H; Yeh, LA, 2010
)
0.36
" Adverse events were assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events."( Retrospective cohort study on the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab with chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: the HGCSG0801 study.
Asaka, M; Hatanaka, K; Hosokawa, A; Iwanaga, I; Kato, T; Komatsu, Y; Kusumi, T; Miyagishima, T; Nakamura, M; Sakata, Y; Sogabe, S; Yuki, S, 2011
)
0.37
" No severe adverse effects of more than grade 3 were encountered."( [Palliative anti-cancer chemotherapy is safely executable in a hemodialytic patient with unresectable advanced gastric cancer].
Hosojima, Y; Miura, T; Nakamura, J; Nakazawa, Y; Ozeki, Y; Takahashi, T; Yamada, S; Yamazaki, H; Yanagi, M, 2011
)
0.37
" End points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and grade 3 or worse adverse events."( Impact of young age on treatment efficacy and safety in advanced colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of patients from nine first-line phase III chemotherapy trials.
Blanke, CD; Bleyer, A; Bot, BM; de Gramont, A; Goldberg, RM; Kohne, CH; Sargent, DJ; Seymour, MT; Thomas, DM, 2011
)
0.37
" No febrile neutropenia or toxic death was recorded."( Cisplatin and irinotecan combination chemotherapy for advanced thymic carcinoma: evaluation of efficacy and toxicity.
Hosomi, Y; Iguchi, M; Okamura, T; Okuma, Y; Shibuya, M; Takagi, Y, 2011
)
0.73
" The adverse effects observed were grade 3 in 7 patients(20."( [Clinical efficacy and safety of CPT-11+CDDP therapy as third-line chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer].
Fujii, S; Fukahori, M; Godai, TI; Imada, T; Kunisaki, C; Makino, H; Masuda, M; Numata, M; Oshima, T; Rino, Y; Sato, T, 2011
)
0.37
" Pharmacokinetics, the first area of investigation, has identified markers such as biliary index, the relative extent of conversion and the glucuronidation ratio, which are capable to define the risk for severe adverse effects."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic predictive markers of irinotecan activity and toxicity.
Bocci, G; Danesi, R; Del Re, M; Di Desidero, T; Di Paolo, A; Lastella, M; Polillo, M, 2011
)
0.61
" Grades 3 and 4 adverse events included diarrhea (21% in the mIFL group and 26% in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group) and neutropenia (19% in the mIFL group and 33% in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group)."( Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III ARTIST trial.
Ba, Y; Feng, FY; Guan, ZZ; He, J; Liang, J; Luo, RC; Qi, C; Qin, SK; Shen, L; Wang, D; Wang, JJ; Wang, LW; Xu, JM; Xu, RH; Yu, SY, 2011
)
0.37
" In cats injected with irinotecan DEBs, such local adverse side effects did not occur."( A safety and toxicity assessment of the administration of multiple intracerebral injections of irinotecan or doxorubicin drug-eluting beads.
Brinker, T; Glage, S; Hedrich, HJ; Held, N; Lewis, AL, 2011
)
0.9
" Although skin toxicities are the most common adverse events associated with EGFR inhibitors, the differences in efficacy and safety between pre-emptive and reactive skin treatment according to KRAS tumor status has not been reported."( The efficacy and safety of panitumumab administered concomitantly with FOLFIRI or Irinotecan in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the secondary analysis from STEPP (Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) by KRAS status.
Iannotti, N; Lacouture, ME; Mitchell, EP; Pillai, MV; Piperdi, B; Shearer, H; Xu, F; Yassine, M, 2011
)
0.59
" The most commonly observed adverse events by KRAS tumor status included dermatitis acneiform and pruritus."( The efficacy and safety of panitumumab administered concomitantly with FOLFIRI or Irinotecan in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the secondary analysis from STEPP (Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) by KRAS status.
Iannotti, N; Lacouture, ME; Mitchell, EP; Pillai, MV; Piperdi, B; Shearer, H; Xu, F; Yassine, M, 2011
)
0.59
"Toxicogenomics, based on the temporal effects of drugs on gene expression, is able to predict toxic effects earlier than traditional technologies by analyzing changes in genomic biomarkers that could precede subsequent protein translation and initiation of histological organ damage."( High-density real-time PCR-based in vivo toxicogenomic screen to predict organ-specific toxicity.
Bito, T; Fabian, G; Farago, N; Feher, LZ; Katona, RL; Kitajka, K; Kulin, S; Nagy, LI; Puskas, LG; Tiszlavicz, L; Tubak, V, 2011
)
0.37
" Relationships between genetic variants and adverse events, tumour response, overall and disease-free survivals were assessed."( Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genetic polymorphisms and toxicity to 5-FU-based chemoradiation in rectal cancer.
Alyasiri, A; Dvorak, A; Fleshman, JW; Hoskins, JM; McLeod, HL; Motsinger-Reif, AA; Myerson, RJ; Roy, S; Tan, BR; Thomas, F, 2011
)
0.37
" However, the adverse effects associated with the treatment have hindered the efficacies of irinotecan."( Ugt1a is required for the protective effect of selenium against irinotecan-induced toxicity.
Cao, S; Durrani, FA; Rustum, YM; Yu, YE, 2012
)
0.84
" The definition of a safe future liver remnant (FLR) volume based on preoperative clinical data in these patients is lacking."( What is a safe future liver remnant size in patients undergoing major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases and treated by intensive preoperative chemotherapy?
Bachellier, P; Chenard, MP; Fuchshuber, P; Jaeck, D; Narita, M; Nobili, C; Oussoultzoglou, E; Pessaux, P; Rosso, E, 2012
)
0.38
"This study provides a cutoff FLR ratio for safe postoperative outcome after major hepatectomy in CLM patients receiving six or more cycles of preoperative chemotherapy."( What is a safe future liver remnant size in patients undergoing major hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases and treated by intensive preoperative chemotherapy?
Bachellier, P; Chenard, MP; Fuchshuber, P; Jaeck, D; Narita, M; Nobili, C; Oussoultzoglou, E; Pessaux, P; Rosso, E, 2012
)
0.38
"Skin toxicity is a frequent adverse event of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeting agents."( Prognostic value of cetuximab-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with parameters of the epidermal growth factor receptor signal transduction pathway: results from a randomized trial of the GERMAN AIO CRC Stu
Giessen, C; Heinemann, V; Jung, A; Kapaun, C; Kirchner, T; Laubender, RP; Modest, DP; Moosmann, N; Neumann, J; Stintzing, S; Wollenberg, A, 2013
)
0.39
"Sequential IRIS + bevacizumab is a safe and effective method of systemic chemotherapy against metastatic colorectal cancer and is compatible with mFOLFIRI + bevacizumab."( Safety verification trials of mFOLFIRI and sequential IRIS + bevacizumab as first- or second-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japanese patients.
Akiyama, S; Andoh, H; Gamoh, M; Ishioka, C; Kato, S; Maeda, S; Mori, T; Murakawa, Y; Ohori, H; Sasaki, Y; Shimodaira, H; Suzuki, T; Takahashi, S; Yamaguchi, T; Yoshioka, T, 2012
)
0.38
" FOLFIRI regimen is safe and effective in the second-line treatment of AGC patients pre-treated with cisplatin and taxanes."( The efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan with leucovorin and bolus and continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) as salvage therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer previously treated with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens.
Alkis, N; Arpacı, E; Benekli, M; Berk, V; Bilici, A; Budakoglu, B; Buyukberber, S; Coskun, U; Dane, F; Demirci, U; Gumus, M; Inal, A; Isıkdogan, A; Kaya, AO; Ozkan, M; Yumuk, F, 2012
)
0.67
" Major grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (28."( Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1 family polypeptide A1 gene (UGT1A1) polymorphisms are associated with toxicity and efficacy in irinotecan monotherapy for refractory pancreatic cancer.
Hamada, T; Hirano, K; Ijichi, H; Isayama, H; Kawakubo, K; Kogure, H; Koike, K; Miyabayashi, K; Mizuno, S; Mohri, D; Nakai, Y; Sasahira, N; Sasaki, T; Satoh, Y; Tada, M; Takahara, N; Takai, D; Uchino, R; Yamamoto, N; Yatomi, Y, 2013
)
0.59
" The active form of CPT-11, SN-38, causes the adverse events such as neutropenia and diarrhea."( Polymorphisms of the UDP-glucuronosyl transferase 1A genes are associated with adverse events in cancer patients receiving irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
Etoh, T; Hayashi, H; Inoue, K; Itoh, K; Kawamura, Y; Kikuyama, M; Kimura, M; Matsumura, T; Minami, S; Sonobe, M; Suzuki, T; Takagi, M; Tsuji, D; Utsuki, H; Yamazaki, T, 2013
)
0.6
" Grade 3/4 diarrhea as predominant toxic effect occurred in 22% of patients with CapOx-bevacizumab and in 16% with mCapIri-bevacizumab."( Capecitabine/irinotecan or capecitabine/oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab is effective and safe as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study of the AIO colorectal study group.
Arnold, D; Dietrich, G; Freier, W; Geißler, M; Graeven, U; Hegewisch-Becker, S; Hinke, A; Kubicka, S; Pohl, M; Reinacher-Schick, A; Schmiegel, W; Schmoll, HJ; Tannapfel, A, 2013
)
0.76
"Both, CapOx-bevacizumab and mCapIri-bevacizumab, show promising activity and an excellent toxic effect profile."( Capecitabine/irinotecan or capecitabine/oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab is effective and safe as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study of the AIO colorectal study group.
Arnold, D; Dietrich, G; Freier, W; Geißler, M; Graeven, U; Hegewisch-Becker, S; Hinke, A; Kubicka, S; Pohl, M; Reinacher-Schick, A; Schmiegel, W; Schmoll, HJ; Tannapfel, A, 2013
)
0.76
"This analysis was conducted to clarify risk factors for severe adverse effects and treatment-related deaths reported during a postmarketing survey of irinotecan."( Risk factors for severe adverse effects and treatment-related deaths in Japanese patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy: a postmarketing survey.
Boku, N; Fujiki, T; Fujino, K; Gemma, A; Kakihata, K; Masatani, S; Morita, S; Shiozawa, T; Tadokoro, J, 2013
)
0.8
" The patient background data and adverse drug reactions were collected through case report forms."( Risk factors for severe adverse effects and treatment-related deaths in Japanese patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy: a postmarketing survey.
Boku, N; Fujiki, T; Fujino, K; Gemma, A; Kakihata, K; Masatani, S; Morita, S; Shiozawa, T; Tadokoro, J, 2013
)
0.6
" Major grade 3-4 adverse drug reactions were leukopenia (34."( Risk factors for severe adverse effects and treatment-related deaths in Japanese patients treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy: a postmarketing survey.
Boku, N; Fujiki, T; Fujino, K; Gemma, A; Kakihata, K; Masatani, S; Morita, S; Shiozawa, T; Tadokoro, J, 2013
)
0.6
" Biomarkers for predicting high-risk severe adverse reactions can help select the best treatment."( Differential toxicity biomarkers for irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.
Cortejoso, L; Escolar, F; García, MI; García-Alfonso, P; González-Haba, E; López-Fernández, LA; Sanjurjo, M, 2013
)
0.66
" The majority of the toxic manifestation is caused by the insufficient deactivation (glucuronidation) of irinotecan active metabolite SN-38 by UGT1A enzyme."( Predictors of irinotecan toxicity and efficacy in treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Filip, S; Grim, J; Paulík, A, 2012
)
0.95
"There have been no case reports of the risk of serious adverse events associated with the administration of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in patients with gynecologic cancer who are compound heterozygous for UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28."( Recurrent cervical cancer in a patient who was compound heterozygous for UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28 presenting with serious adverse events during irinotecan hydrochloride/nedaplatin therapy.
Miura, Y; Shoji, T; Sugiyama, T; Takatori, E; Takeuchi, S; Yoshizaki, A, 2013
)
0.8
"To investigate the correlation of MDR1 and ABCG2 genetic polymorphisms with the efficacy and adverse events of irinotecan chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)."( [Correlation of MDR1 and ABCG2 genetic polymorphisms with the efficacy and adverse events of irinotecan chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer].
Dang, YZ; Gao, J; Li, J; Li, YY; Shen, L; Sun, ZW; Wang, XC, 2013
)
0.82
" Simultaneous heterozygous UGT1A1 28 and UGT1A1 6 polymorphisms may produce higher exposure to SN-38 and a higher risk of adverse effects related to irinotecan."( Severe irinotecan-induced toxicity in a patient with UGT1A1 28 and UGT1A1 6 polymorphisms.
Ge, FJ; Lin, L; Liu, ZY; Sharma, MR; Wang, Y; Xu, JM, 2013
)
1.04
"At 5 centers, Cmab+CPT-11 was an effective and safe treatment after second-line therapy."( [Efficacy and safety of cetuximab+irinotecan for unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer].
Akatsuka, S; Arioka, H; Azuma, T; Egawa, M; Hibi, K; Ito, T; Kenmochi, T; Koizumi, W; Nagashima, A; Nemoto, H; Sasaki, T; Shimada, K; Soda, H; Takinishi, Y, 2013
)
0.67
" Here, we investigated the prevalence of three different variants of UGT1A1 (UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*27 and UGT1A1*28) and their relationships with irinotecan-induced adverse events in patients with gynecologic cancer, who are treated with lower doses of irinotecan than patients with other types of solid tumors."( Polymorphisms in the UGT1A1 gene predict adverse effects of irinotecan in the treatment of gynecologic cancer in Japanese patients.
Akahane, T; Aoki, D; Hirasawa, A; Kataoka, F; Kosaki, K; Makita, K; Nomura, H; Okubo, K; Saito, K; Susumu, N; Tanigawara, Y; Tominaga, E; Zama, T, 2013
)
0.83
" Recognizing this self-limiting toxic effect of oxaliplatin is important in order to avoid dose reductions that may affect clinical outcomes."( A curious case of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity: recurrent, self-limiting dysarthria.
Dasanu, CA; Joseph, R, 2014
)
0.4
"Cardiac toxicity an uncommon but serious side-effect of some fluoropyrimides."( Final results of Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group ARCTIC study: an audit of raltitrexed for patients with cardiac toxicity induced by fluoropyrimidines.
Ferry, D; Fournier, M; Gebski, V; Gordon, S; Karapetis, CS; Price, TJ; Ransom, D; Simes, RJ; Tebbutt, N; Wilson, K; Yip, D, 2014
)
0.4
" Raltitrexed, alone or in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, provides a safe option in terms of cardiac toxicity for such patients."( Final results of Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group ARCTIC study: an audit of raltitrexed for patients with cardiac toxicity induced by fluoropyrimidines.
Ferry, D; Fournier, M; Gebski, V; Gordon, S; Karapetis, CS; Price, TJ; Ransom, D; Simes, RJ; Tebbutt, N; Wilson, K; Yip, D, 2014
)
0.65
" However, he experienced adverse effects, and subsequently, he was effectively treated with cisplatin (CDDP) and irinotecan (CPT-11)."( [An effective treatment by chemotherapy with CDDP+CPT-11 for recurrent gastric cancer which S-1 cannot be used owing to adverse effects].
Aoyagi, H; Hasegawa, K; Isogai, J; Kaneko, J; Maejima, S; Matsui, T; Yoshida, T, 2013
)
0.6
" CPT-11 causes toxic side-effects in patients."( The role of intestinal microbiota in development of irinotecan toxicity and in toxicity reduction through dietary fibres in rats.
Baracos, V; Dieleman, L; Farhangfar, A; Gänzle, MG; Lin, XB; Sawyer, MB; Schieber, A; Valcheva, R, 2014
)
0.65
"Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) is a common and often severe side effect experienced by colorectal cancer (CRC) patients during their treatment."( Gastro-intestinal toxicity of chemotherapeutics in colorectal cancer: the role of inflammation.
Doherty, GA; Lee, CS; Ryan, EJ, 2014
)
0.4
"Many drugs are associated with variable response rates and, of the 1,200 drugs approved for use in the United States, about 15% are associated with adverse drug responses (Jorde, Carey, & Bamshad, 2010c)."( Allelic expression of phase II metabolizing enzymes and relationship to irinotecan toxicity.
Tadje, M, 2014
)
0.63
" In xenograft models, 9a demonstrated significant activity without overt adverse effects at 5 and 10 mg/kg, comparable to 3 at 100 mg/kg."( Design, synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel 20(s)-sulfonylamidine derivatives of camptothecin as potent antitumor agents.
Chang, LC; Goto, M; Hung, HY; Kuo, DH; Kuo, SC; Lee, KH; Liu, YQ; Morris-Natschke, SL; Nan, X; Pan, SL; Qian, K; Teng, CM; Wang, CY; Wang, MJ; Wu, TS; Wu, YC; Yang, JS; Yang, L; Yang, XM; Zhao, XB; Zhao, YL, 2014
)
0.4
" In vivo experiment showed Nano Se at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day significantly alleviated adverse effects induced by irinotecan (60 mg/kg) treatment."( Cytotoxicity and therapeutic effect of irinotecan combined with selenium nanoparticles.
Cai, P; Gao, F; Gao, L; Gao, X; Huang, G; Liang, J; Liu, R; Wang, Y; Wei, Y; Yuan, Q; Zhu, H, 2014
)
0.88
" The incidence of adverse events was 70."( Efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) therapy to treat advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer.
Abe, S; Egawa, Y; Futami, K; Higashi, D; Hirano, K; Hirano, Y; Inoue, R; Maekawa, T; Mikami, K; Miyake, T; Miyazaki, M; Takahashi, H; Uwatoko, S; Yamamoto, S, 2014
)
0.71
" IRIS therapy had a low incidence of serious adverse events and allowed patients to continue therapy on an out-patient basis."( Efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) therapy to treat advanced/recurrent colorectal cancer.
Abe, S; Egawa, Y; Futami, K; Higashi, D; Hirano, K; Hirano, Y; Inoue, R; Maekawa, T; Mikami, K; Miyake, T; Miyazaki, M; Takahashi, H; Uwatoko, S; Yamamoto, S, 2014
)
0.71
"The toxic effects of irinotecan are well understood."( The power of genes: a case of unusually severe systemic toxicity after localized hepatic chemoembolization with irinotecan-eluted microspheres for metastatic colon cancer.
Cruz, JE; Hermes-DeSantis, E; Jabbour, SK; Moss, RA; Nosher, JL; Saksena, R, 2014
)
0.93
"Although genetic testing prior to the initiation of irinotecan therapy is not currently recommended, assessment of UGT1A1 polymorphism is warranted when severe adverse events typical of systemic therapy manifest following DEBIRI-TACE."( The power of genes: a case of unusually severe systemic toxicity after localized hepatic chemoembolization with irinotecan-eluted microspheres for metastatic colon cancer.
Cruz, JE; Hermes-DeSantis, E; Jabbour, SK; Moss, RA; Nosher, JL; Saksena, R, 2014
)
0.86
"The aim was to investigate the association between uridine diphosphate glucuronide transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene promoter region polymorphism and irinotecan-related adverse effects and efficacy on recurrent and refractory small cell lung cancer (SCLC)."( Uridine diphosphate glucuronide transferase 1A1FNx0128 gene polymorphism and the toxicity of irinotecan in recurrent and refractory small cell lung cancer.
Conghua, X; Haifeng, Y; Haiyan, Y; Lei, G; Lulu, M; Tao, L; Yun, F; Zhiyu, H, 2014
)
0.82
" The efficacy and adverse effects of irinotecan were evaluated."( Uridine diphosphate glucuronide transferase 1A1FNx0128 gene polymorphism and the toxicity of irinotecan in recurrent and refractory small cell lung cancer.
Conghua, X; Haifeng, Y; Haiyan, Y; Lei, G; Lulu, M; Tao, L; Yun, F; Zhiyu, H, 2014
)
0.89
"Irinotecan showed efficacy in patients with recurrent and refractory SCLC; UGT1A1 FNx01 28 polymorphism failed to predict the incidence of serious adverse effects and efficacy of irinotecan."( Uridine diphosphate glucuronide transferase 1A1FNx0128 gene polymorphism and the toxicity of irinotecan in recurrent and refractory small cell lung cancer.
Conghua, X; Haifeng, Y; Haiyan, Y; Lei, G; Lulu, M; Tao, L; Yun, F; Zhiyu, H, 2014
)
2.06
"Modern anticancer chemotherapy can cause numerous adverse effects in the organism, whose functioning has already been disrupted by the neoplastic process itself."( Evaluation of the toxicity of anticancer chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer.
Filipczyk-Cisarż, E; Kowalska, T; Nartowski, K; Wiela-Hojeńska, A; Łapiński, Ł,
)
0.13
"To prevent adverse drug reactions in the post-marketing phase, therapeutic drug monitoring and various laboratory tests have been used for decades."( [Utilization of Genomic Biomarkers for Post-marketing Safety of Drugs].
Kaniwa, N, 2015
)
0.42
" In conclusion, 3 days of fasting protects against the toxic side-effects of irinotecan in a clinically relevant mouse model of spontaneously developing colorectal cancer without affecting its anti-tumor activity."( Fasting protects against the side effects of irinotecan but preserves its anti-tumor effect in Apc15lox mutant mice.
Bijman-Lagcher, W; de Bruin, RW; Huisman, SA; IJzermans, JN; Smits, R, 2015
)
0.91
"To assess the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) in the form of clinical symptoms and liver/biliary injuries (LBI) in patients with hepatic malignancies treated with transarterial chemoembolization using 70-150 μm drug-eluting beads (DEBs)."( Transarterial hepatic chemoembolization with 70-150 µm drug-eluting beads: assessment of clinical safety and liver toxicity profile.
Ashton, A; Gupta, S; Kaseb, A; Odisio, BC; Tam, AL; Vauthey, JN; Wallace, MJ; Wei, W; Yan, Y, 2015
)
0.42
"Transarterial chemoembolization with 70-150 μm DEBs was considered safe in the present study population given the acceptably low incidence and severity of AEs."( Transarterial hepatic chemoembolization with 70-150 µm drug-eluting beads: assessment of clinical safety and liver toxicity profile.
Ashton, A; Gupta, S; Kaseb, A; Odisio, BC; Tam, AL; Vauthey, JN; Wallace, MJ; Wei, W; Yan, Y, 2015
)
0.42
" Weight and adverse side effects were recorded daily."( Fasting protects against the side effects of irinotecan treatment but does not affect anti-tumour activity in mice.
de Bruijn, P; de Bruin, RW; Ghobadi Moghaddam-Helmantel, IM; Huisman, SA; IJzermans, JN; Mathijssen, RH; Wiemer, EA, 2016
)
0.69
" Fasting induced a lower systemic exposure to SN-38, which may explain the absence of adverse side effects, while tumour levels of SN-38 remained unchanged."( Fasting protects against the side effects of irinotecan treatment but does not affect anti-tumour activity in mice.
de Bruijn, P; de Bruin, RW; Ghobadi Moghaddam-Helmantel, IM; Huisman, SA; IJzermans, JN; Mathijssen, RH; Wiemer, EA, 2016
)
0.69
"The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) is considered the first-line chemotherapy for fit patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but carries an unfavourable adverse event (AE) profile."( Safety and Efficacy of Modified FOLFIRINOX for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A UK Single-Centre Experience.
Basu, B; Calder, J; Corrie, P; Ghorani, E; Hewitt, C; Wong, HH, 2015
)
0.68
" The most common adverse event in both groups was diarrhea (Q3W 92."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of navitoclax (ABT-263) in combination with irinotecan: results of an open-label, phase 1 study.
Arzt, J; Busman, TA; Holen, KD; Lian, G; LoRusso, P; Rosen, LS; Rudersdorf, NS; Tolcher, AW; Vanderwal, CA; Waring, JF; Yang, J, 2015
)
0.64
" All-grade adverse events occurred in 18 % of patients receiving prior systemic irinotecan compared with 15 % of patients receiving no prior systemic irinotecan (including chemo-naïve patients)."( Efficacy and Toxicity of Hepatic Intra-Arterial Drug-Eluting (Irinotecan) Bead (DEBIRI) Therapy in Irinotecan-Refractory Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases.
Akinwande, O; Bhutiani, N; Martin, RC, 2016
)
0.9
" While DEBIRI complete response rates are greatest and overall adverse events are least in chemotherapy-naïve individuals, it retains its respectable efficacy and low rate of serious adverse events even in the setting of previous administration of systemic chemotherapy."( Efficacy and Toxicity of Hepatic Intra-Arterial Drug-Eluting (Irinotecan) Bead (DEBIRI) Therapy in Irinotecan-Refractory Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases.
Akinwande, O; Bhutiani, N; Martin, RC, 2016
)
0.67
" While the four-drug regimen, FOLFIRINOX (comprising irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin), has a better survival outcome than the more frequently used gemcitabine, the former treatment platform is highly toxic and restricted for use in patients with good performance status."( Irinotecan Delivery by Lipid-Coated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Shows Improved Efficacy and Safety over Liposomes for Pancreatic Cancer.
Chang, CH; Donahue, T; Kang, Y; Liao, Y; Liu, X; Meng, H; Nel, AE; Situ, A; Villabroza, KR, 2016
)
2.13
" We evaluated treatment-related adverse events (AEs), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)."( Safety and Management of Toxicity Related to Aflibercept in Combination with Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Irinotecan in Malaysian Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Abdullah, NM; Sharial, MM; Yusof, MM; Zaatar, A, 2016
)
0.65
" All adverse events resolved with supportive management."( Safety and efficacy of aflibercept in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan in the treatment of Asian patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chong, DQ; Choo, SP; Chua, C; Imperial, M; Manalo, M; Ng, M; Tan, IB; Teo, P; Yong, G, 2016
)
0.66
"Traditional methods of reporting adverse events in clinical trials are inadequate for modern cancer treatments with chronic administration."( Longitudinal adverse event assessment in oncology clinical trials: the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis of Alliance trials NCCTG N9741 and 979254.
Atherton, PJ; Grothey, A; Loprinzi, CL; Novotny, PJ; Sloan, JA; Thanarajasingam, G, 2016
)
0.43
"We developed an analytic approach and standardised, comprehensive format, the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) approach, which combines graphs and adverse event tabular displays with multiple longitudinal statistical techniques into a readily applicable method to study toxic effects."( Longitudinal adverse event assessment in oncology clinical trials: the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis of Alliance trials NCCTG N9741 and 979254.
Atherton, PJ; Grothey, A; Loprinzi, CL; Novotny, PJ; Sloan, JA; Thanarajasingam, G, 2016
)
0.43
"The ToxT analytical approach incorporates the dimension of time into adverse event assessment and offers a more comprehensive depiction of toxic effects than present methods."( Longitudinal adverse event assessment in oncology clinical trials: the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) analysis of Alliance trials NCCTG N9741 and 979254.
Atherton, PJ; Grothey, A; Loprinzi, CL; Novotny, PJ; Sloan, JA; Thanarajasingam, G, 2016
)
0.43
" The patients were followed up to analyze the relationship between different genotypes with adverse reactions and the clinical outcome of irinotecan-based chemotherapy."( UGT1A1 gene polymorphism is associated with toxicity and clinical efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Keyoumu, S; Qu, Y; Tang, X; Tang, Y; Xu, C; Zhou, N, 2016
)
0.86
"UGT1A1 gene polymorphism predicts irinotecan-related adverse reactions in advanced CRC patients of Xinjiang Uygur and Han nationality; UGT1A1 gene polymorphism is correlated with efficacy and prognosis in Uygur nationality, but only related to prognosis in Han nationality in irinotecan-based chemotherapy."( UGT1A1 gene polymorphism is associated with toxicity and clinical efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Keyoumu, S; Qu, Y; Tang, X; Tang, Y; Xu, C; Zhou, N, 2016
)
0.94
" The development of in vivo tools to study OATP1A/1B functions has greatly advanced our mechanistic understanding of their functional role in drug pharmacokinetics, and their implications for therapeutic efficacy and toxic side effects of anticancer and other drug treatments."( The impact of Organic Anion-Transporting Polypeptides (OATPs) on disposition and toxicity of antitumor drugs: Insights from knockout and humanized mice.
Durmus, S; Schinkel, AH; van Hoppe, S, 2016
)
0.43
" The major grade 3 or 4 adverse events including neutropenia, fatigue, and anorexia were observed in 12 (24 %), 8 (16 %), and 7 (14 %), respectively."( Efficacy and safety of irinotecan monotherapy as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.
Fukutomi, A; Hamauchi, S; Kawahira, M; Kawai, S; Kawakami, T; Kito, Y; Machida, N; Onozawa, Y; Todaka, A; Tsushima, T; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yokota, T; Yoshida, Y, 2016
)
0.74
"Gastrointestinal toxicity is the most common adverse effect of chemotherapy."( Intestinal permeability to iohexol as an in vivo marker of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity in Sprague-Dawley rats.
Forsgård, RA; Frias, R; Holma, R; Korpela, R; Lindén, J; Österlund, P; Spillmann, T, 2016
)
0.43
" The risk of mortality, therapeutic efficacy, and adverse effect were meta-analyzed."( Efficacy and safety of addition of bevacizumab to FOLFIRI or irinotecan/bolus 5-FU/LV (IFL) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Chen, K; Gong, Y; Shen, Y; Zhang, Q; Zhou, T, 2016
)
0.68
" Main outcome measures included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events."( The efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus irrinotecan-based chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Chen, Q; Cheng, M; Wang, Z; Zhao, S, 2016
)
0.43
" Moreover, combination therapy also induced an incidence of 56% treatment-related adverse events."( The efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus irrinotecan-based chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Chen, Q; Cheng, M; Wang, Z; Zhao, S, 2016
)
0.43
" The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were nausea (18."( Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. A Single Center Experience.
Bodoky, G; Harsanyi, L; Hegyi, P; Lakatos, G; Nehéz, L; Petranyi, A; Szűcs, A, 2017
)
0.46
" With regard to the reasons for discontinuation of treatment, the Ram + PTX regimen had only one case of being discontinued owing to adverse events, and had a profile similar to that of the PTX and CPT-11 regimens."( Cost-effectiveness and safety of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.
Kimura, M; Teramachi, H; Usami, E; Yoshimura, T, 2018
)
0.48
" Polymorphisms rs8175347, rs17868323, rs3832043, rs11692021 and rs7577677 were associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects."( Effect of UGT, SLCO, ABCB and ABCC polymorphisms on irinotecan toxicity.
García Gil, S; Gutiérrez Nicolás, F; Llanos Muñoz, M; Martín Calero, B; Nazco Casariego, GJ; Pérez Pérez, JA; Ramos Díaz, R; Viña Romero, MM, 2018
)
0.73
" Bevacizumab was administered at a dose of 100 mg intravenously once a week combined with one or two types of chemotherapeutic drugs until confirmed disease progression or an intolerable adverse event was observed."( Analysis of the activity and safety of weekly low-dose bevacizumab-based regimens in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Chen, J; Fan, Y; Hong, R; Ma, F; Ou, K; Sang, D; Wang, J; Xu, B; Yuan, P; Zhai, X; Zhao, C, 2018
)
0.48
" The most common hematological adverse events were neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia."( Analysis of the activity and safety of weekly low-dose bevacizumab-based regimens in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Chen, J; Fan, Y; Hong, R; Ma, F; Ou, K; Sang, D; Wang, J; Xu, B; Yuan, P; Zhai, X; Zhao, C, 2018
)
0.48
" The objective of this study was to compare outcome measures, adverse effects, and cost of FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRINOX treatments in rectal cancer patients."( Comparisons of Efficacy, Safety, and Cost of Chemotherapy Regimens FOLFOX4 and FOLFIRINOX in Rectal Cancer: A Randomized, Multicenter Study.
Chen, Y; Liu, J; Qi, F; Yan, Q; Zhang, G; Zheng, Z, 2018
)
0.48
"FOLFIRINOX has been one of the first-line options for advanced pancreatic cancer, even though it induces significant adverse effects."( The benefits of modified FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic cancer and its induced adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fan, Z; Liu, B; Lu, T; Tong, H, 2018
)
0.48
" The concentration of the toxic metabolite, SN-38, was measured in the serum, and the activity of main enzyme, carboxylesterase (CEs) involved in biotransformation of irinotecan to SN-38 formation was measured in the liver."( Impact of diet on irinotecan toxicity in mice.
Gao, S; Ghose, R; Hu, M; Ittmann, MM; Mallick, P; Shah, P; Trivedi, M, 2018
)
1.01
" Toxic and therapeutic effects of IRI are also due to its active metabolite SN-38, reported to be up to 100 times more cytotoxic than IRI."( Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Markers of Irinotecan Toxicity.
Antunes, MV; Hahn, RZ; Linden, R; Perassolo, MS; Schwartsmann, G; Suyenaga, ES; Verza, SG, 2019
)
0.77
" Chemotherapy induced adverse reactions (neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea,\ vomiting, anorexia and infection) were recorded, and short-term effect of chemotherapy was evaluated regularly."( Effects of Shengjiangxiexin decoction on irinotecan-induced toxicity in patients with UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms.
Deng, B; Jia, L; Li, X; Li, Y; Lou, Y; Tan, H; Yu, L, 2017
)
0.72
" There were no significant differences in any toxic effects\ (neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia or infection) between *6 or *28 variant patients\ (high risk group) and wild type patients."( Effects of Shengjiangxiexin decoction on irinotecan-induced toxicity in patients with UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms.
Deng, B; Jia, L; Li, X; Li, Y; Lou, Y; Tan, H; Yu, L, 2017
)
0.72
" The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (13 patients, 18%), febrile neutropenia (3 patients, 4%), diarrhea (11 patients, 15%), hypertension (19 patients, 26%), proteinuria (8 patients, 11%), infections (8 patients, 11%), and mucositis (6 patients, 8%), with no toxic deaths."( AMALTHEA: Prospective, Single-Arm Study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of First-Line FOLFIRI + Aflibercept for 6 Months Followed by Aflibercept Maintenance in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Aravantinos, G; Bafaloukos, D; Efstratiou, I; Fountzilas, G; Goudopoulou, A; Kalogera-Fountzila, A; Kalogeropoulou, L; Karavasilis, V; Kentepozidis, N; Koliou, GA; Kotoula, V; Koumakis, G; Laschos, K; Pectasides, D; Pentheroudakis, G; Petraki, C; Poulios, C; Samantas, E; Sgouros, J; Souglakos, I; Tikas, I; Voutsina, A; Vrettou, E; Zarkavelis, G, 2018
)
0.48
" Preliminary data hint that this regimen has cytoreductive activity in disease with adverse biology."( AMALTHEA: Prospective, Single-Arm Study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of First-Line FOLFIRI + Aflibercept for 6 Months Followed by Aflibercept Maintenance in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Aravantinos, G; Bafaloukos, D; Efstratiou, I; Fountzilas, G; Goudopoulou, A; Kalogera-Fountzila, A; Kalogeropoulou, L; Karavasilis, V; Kentepozidis, N; Koliou, GA; Kotoula, V; Koumakis, G; Laschos, K; Pectasides, D; Pentheroudakis, G; Petraki, C; Poulios, C; Samantas, E; Sgouros, J; Souglakos, I; Tikas, I; Voutsina, A; Vrettou, E; Zarkavelis, G, 2018
)
0.48
"Preventing severe irinotecan-induced adverse reactions would allow us to offer better treatment and improve patients' quality of life."( Clinical utility of ABCB1 genotyping for preventing toxicity in treatment with irinotecan.
Blanco, C; García, MI; García-Alfonso, P; García-González, X; Grávalos, C; Longo, F; López-Fernández, LA; Martínez, V; Pachón, V; Robles, L; Salvador-Martín, S; Sanjurjo-Sáez, M, 2018
)
1.04
" However, there are serious adverse events associated with its use, especially severe hypertension and gastrointestinal perforation, that need to be considered."( Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab) in Combination with Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Almeida, PHRF; Andrade, EIG; Cherchiglia, ML; da Silva, WC; de Araujo, VE; de Assis Acurcio, F; Dos Santos, JBR; Godman, B; Kurdi, A; Lima, EMEA; Silva, MRRD, 2018
)
0.48
" It can cause severe adverse drug reactions, such as neutropenia or diarrhea."( The risk of adverse events of CPT- 11.
Ichikawa, W; Imataka, H; Sekikawa, T, 2016
)
0.43
" No statistical differences were observed in treatment-related adverse events, hospital admissions, or further treatment lines between age groups."( Second-line treatment efficacy and toxicity in older vs. non-older patients with advanced gastric cancer: A multicentre real-world study.
Antonuzzo, L; Aprile, G; Avallone, A; Bordonaro, R; Cinieri, S; Di Donato, S; Fanotto, V; Fornaro, L; Gerratana, L; Giampieri, R; Leone, F; Melisi, D; Nichetti, F; Pellegrino, A; Rimassa, L; Rosati, G; Santini, D; Scartozzi, M; Silvestris, N; Stragliotto, S; Tomasello, G; Vasile, E, 2019
)
0.51
" Incidence of adverse events was similar between age groups."( Second-line treatment efficacy and toxicity in older vs. non-older patients with advanced gastric cancer: A multicentre real-world study.
Antonuzzo, L; Aprile, G; Avallone, A; Bordonaro, R; Cinieri, S; Di Donato, S; Fanotto, V; Fornaro, L; Gerratana, L; Giampieri, R; Leone, F; Melisi, D; Nichetti, F; Pellegrino, A; Rimassa, L; Rosati, G; Santini, D; Scartozzi, M; Silvestris, N; Stragliotto, S; Tomasello, G; Vasile, E, 2019
)
0.51
" Grade 3 or higher adverse events of special interest were neutropenia (13%, 22%, and 64% for the WT, SH and Homo/DH genotypes), febrile neutropenia (2%, 7%, and 50%) and diarrhea (6%, 5%, and 21%)."( Association between UGT1A1 gene polymorphism and safety and efficacy of irinotecan monotherapy as the third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer.
Boku, N; Hamaguchi, T; Higuchi, K; Honma, Y; Iwasa, S; Kato, K; Shoji, H; Takashima, A; Yamaguchi, T, 2019
)
0.75
" Catheter-related adverse events were reported per Society of Interventional Radiology classification, and treatment toxicities were reported per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events."( Feasibility and Safety of CT-Guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Irinotecan-Loaded Microspheres for the Treatment of Large, Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases.
Collettini, F; Gebauer, B; Geisel, D; Jonczyk, M; Meddeb, A; Schnapauff, D; Wieners, G, 2020
)
0.77
"Combined irinotecan chemoembolization and CT-guided HDRBT is safe and shows a low incidence of toxicities, which were self-resolving."( Feasibility and Safety of CT-Guided High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Irinotecan-Loaded Microspheres for the Treatment of Large, Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases.
Collettini, F; Gebauer, B; Geisel, D; Jonczyk, M; Meddeb, A; Schnapauff, D; Wieners, G, 2020
)
1.18
" Anti-EGFR MoAbs have increased the risk of adverse effects than chemotherapy alone."( Efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies combined with different chemotherapy regimens in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Han, J; Li, J; Li, Y; Su, Y; Sun, H; Wu, X; Zhou, X, 2019
)
0.51
"Gastrointestinal (GI)-related adverse events (AEs) are commonly observed in the clinic during cancer treatments."( A Citrulline-Based Translational Population System Toxicology Model for Gastrointestinal-Related Adverse Events Associated With Anticancer Treatments.
Abdul-Hadi, K; Brown, A; Guan, E; Wagoner, M; Yoneyama, T; Zhu, AZX, 2019
)
0.51
" Here, we discover the specific bacterial GUS enzymes that generate SN-38, the active and toxic metabolite of irinotecan, from human fecal samples using a unique activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) platform."( Discovering the Microbial Enzymes Driving Drug Toxicity with Activity-Based Protein Profiling.
Artola, M; Bhatt, AP; Cloer, EW; Davies, GJ; Goldfarb, D; Jariwala, PB; Major, MB; Overkleeft, HS; Pellock, SJ; Redinbo, MR; Roberts, LR; Simpson, JB; Walton, WG, 2020
)
0.77
" However, their use in the elderly is discouraged because of adverse events."( The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in the elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Bai, XL; Chen, W; Chen, YW; Fu, QH; Gao, SL; Guo, CX; Huang, DB; Li, X; Liang, TB; Ma, T; Que, RS; Su, W; Tang, TY; Zhang, Q; Zhang, XC, 2020
)
0.56
" The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were compared between the groups."( The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in the elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Bai, XL; Chen, W; Chen, YW; Fu, QH; Gao, SL; Guo, CX; Huang, DB; Li, X; Liang, TB; Ma, T; Que, RS; Su, W; Tang, TY; Zhang, Q; Zhang, XC, 2020
)
0.56
" However, the elderly patients suffered a higher incidence of severe adverse events (50% vs."( The efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy in the elderly with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Bai, XL; Chen, W; Chen, YW; Fu, QH; Gao, SL; Guo, CX; Huang, DB; Li, X; Liang, TB; Ma, T; Que, RS; Su, W; Tang, TY; Zhang, Q; Zhang, XC, 2020
)
0.56
"Delayed diarrhea is a common side effect of irinotecan administration, leading to a reduction in dose and thus a delay in anticancer therapy."( Ganciclovir reduces irinotecan-induced intestinal toxicity by inhibiting NLRP3 activation.
Huang, H; Jiang, W; Jinbo, M; Wang, H; Wang, X; Yu, P; Zhang, G; Zhang, X, 2020
)
1.14
" In stage two, an additional 20 patients were enrolled at a starting dose as defined in stage one, provided that in stage ≥1 objective response or ≥2 stable diseases were observed and ≤3 patients had serious adverse events (SAEs) within the first 6 weeks of treatment."( Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as salvage treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, single arm, phase 2 trial.
Belkouz, A; de Vos-Geelen, J; Eskens, FALM; Klümpen, HJ; Mathôt, RAA; Punt, CJA; van Gulik, TM; van Oijen, MGH; Wilmink, JW, 2020
)
0.56
" One patient had a SAE during the first 6 weeks of treatment, and five patients required a dose reduction due to adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as salvage treatment in advanced biliary tract cancer: an open-label, single arm, phase 2 trial.
Belkouz, A; de Vos-Geelen, J; Eskens, FALM; Klümpen, HJ; Mathôt, RAA; Punt, CJA; van Gulik, TM; van Oijen, MGH; Wilmink, JW, 2020
)
0.56
"Diarrhea is a common adverse reaction in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy, for which there is currently no effective method of treatment."( Efficacy and safety of Shengjiang Xiexin decoction in prophylaxis of chemotherapy-related diarrhea in small cell lung cancer patients: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Deng, B; Deng, C; Gao, Y; Jia, L; Lou, Y; Su, F, 2020
)
0.56
"9 months, respectively; gastrointestinal dysfunction, leukopenia and hypertension were the three most common adverse events, accounting for 36."( Therapeutic effect and side effects of Bevacizumab combined with Irinotecan in the treatment of paediatric intracranial tumours: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Di, F; Li, Q; Ma, HY; Sun, T; Xiang, RL; Xu, Y, 2020
)
0.8
" Gastrointestinal dysfunction, leukopenia and hypertension were the toxic side effects with the highest incidence."( Therapeutic effect and side effects of Bevacizumab combined with Irinotecan in the treatment of paediatric intracranial tumours: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Di, F; Li, Q; Ma, HY; Sun, T; Xiang, RL; Xu, Y, 2020
)
0.8
" No toxic death was observed."( Safety and Efficacy of Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, Capecitabine, Cisplatin as Second-line Therapy for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After FOLFIRINOX.
Bengrine, L; Fumet, JD; Ghiringhelli, F; Granconato, L; Hennequin, A; Palmier, R; Vincent, J, 2020
)
0.56
" Gastrointestinal mucositis is a common and debilitating side-effect of anticancer therapy contributing to dose reductions, delays and cessation of treatment, greatly impacting clinical outcomes."( Impact of chemotherapy-induced enteric nervous system toxicity on gastrointestinal mucositis.
Al Thaalibi, M; McQuade, RM; Nurgali, K, 2020
)
0.56
" Adverse events during the first 30 days upon initial treatment were hypertension in 21."( LifePearl microspheres loaded with irinotecan in the treatment of Liver-dominant metastatic colorectal carcinoma: feasibility, safety and pharmacokinetic study.
Helmberger, T; Isailovic, TV; Maleux, G; Pereira, P; Prenen, H; Spriet, I, 2020
)
0.84
"Current adverse event reporting practices do not document longitudinal characteristics of adverse effects, and alternative methods are not easily interpretable and have not been employed by clinical trials."( Adverse event load, onset, and maximum grade: A novel method of reporting adverse events in cancer clinical trials.
Cohen, R; de Gramont, A; Fuchs, C; Goldberg, RM; Hurwitz, H; Kempf, E; Lopes, GS; Olswold, CL; Saltz, L; Shi, Q; Tournigand, C, 2021
)
0.62
"Our method provided additional information compared to traditional adverse event reports."( Adverse event load, onset, and maximum grade: A novel method of reporting adverse events in cancer clinical trials.
Cohen, R; de Gramont, A; Fuchs, C; Goldberg, RM; Hurwitz, H; Kempf, E; Lopes, GS; Olswold, CL; Saltz, L; Shi, Q; Tournigand, C, 2021
)
0.62
"We developed an adverse event reporting method that provides clinically relevant information about treatment toxicity by incorporating two longitudinal adverse event metrics to the traditional maximum grade approach."( Adverse event load, onset, and maximum grade: A novel method of reporting adverse events in cancer clinical trials.
Cohen, R; de Gramont, A; Fuchs, C; Goldberg, RM; Hurwitz, H; Kempf, E; Lopes, GS; Olswold, CL; Saltz, L; Shi, Q; Tournigand, C, 2021
)
0.62
" The main toxic side effect of the patients was gastrointestinal reaction in both groups."( The efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with nedaplatin in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Fang, S; Fu, J; Wang, D; Wang, Y; Wen, Y; Yin, X,
)
0.43
" The outcomes were overall response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival, and the incidence of the most common adverse events."( Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Plus Oxaliplatin- or Irinotecan-Based Doublet Backbone Chemotherapy as the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hui, F; Qi, X; Ren, T; Shen, Z; Wang, S; Xu, C; Zhang, Y; Zhao, Q, 2021
)
0.87
" The two different doublet regimens combined with BEV had their specific features of adverse events."( Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Plus Oxaliplatin- or Irinotecan-Based Doublet Backbone Chemotherapy as the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Hui, F; Qi, X; Ren, T; Shen, Z; Wang, S; Xu, C; Zhang, Y; Zhao, Q, 2021
)
0.87
"A monocentric comparative before/after study was carried out in an oncology day hospital to evaluate the efficacy of Safe Infusion Devices in reducing drug exposure compared to usual infusion practices."( Evaluation of a safe infusion device on reducing occupational exposure of nurses to antineoplastic drugs: a comparative prospective study. Contamoins-1.
Blanc, E; Bouleftour, W; Forges, F; Guitton, J; Hugues, M; Macé, A; Macron, C; Menguy, S; Raymond, B; Simoëns, X; Tinquaut, F, 2021
)
0.62
"3% of contaminated samples while Safe Infusion Devices to a rate of 15%: Safe Infusion Devices reduced the risk of gloves contamination by 85% in multivariate analysis (Odds ratio = 0."( Evaluation of a safe infusion device on reducing occupational exposure of nurses to antineoplastic drugs: a comparative prospective study. Contamoins-1.
Blanc, E; Bouleftour, W; Forges, F; Guitton, J; Hugues, M; Macé, A; Macron, C; Menguy, S; Raymond, B; Simoëns, X; Tinquaut, F, 2021
)
0.62
"Despite the current practice of using neutral solvent-purged infusers, the occupational exposure remains high for nurses and Safe Infusion Devices significantly reduced this risk of exposure."( Evaluation of a safe infusion device on reducing occupational exposure of nurses to antineoplastic drugs: a comparative prospective study. Contamoins-1.
Blanc, E; Bouleftour, W; Forges, F; Guitton, J; Hugues, M; Macé, A; Macron, C; Menguy, S; Raymond, B; Simoëns, X; Tinquaut, F, 2021
)
0.62
"Genetic variations of enzymes that affect the pharmacokinetics and hence effects of medications differ between ethnicities, resulting in variation in the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR) between different populations."( The Use of Subgroup Disproportionality Analyses to Explore the Sensitivity of a Global Database of Individual Case Safety Reports to Known Pharmacogenomic Risk Variants Common in Japan.
Aoki, Y; Chandler, RE; Lönnstedt, IM; Wakao, R, 2021
)
0.62
"Callispheres® microspheres (CSM) are the first drug-eluting bead (DEB) product developed in China; meanwhile, DEB-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with CSM is effective and safe in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma."( Irinotecan eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization using Callispheres® microspheres is an effective and safe approach in treating unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Bian, J; Liu, S; Wang, R; Wu, J; Zhang, Y; Zhao, G; Zhao, T; Zhou, J, 2022
)
2.16
" Postoperative treatment response (including complete response rate (CR), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR)), survival data (overall survival (OS)), liver function, and adverse events were documented during the follow-up."( Irinotecan eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization using Callispheres® microspheres is an effective and safe approach in treating unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Bian, J; Liu, S; Wang, R; Wu, J; Zhang, Y; Zhao, G; Zhao, T; Zhou, J, 2022
)
2.16
" No grade 3 or grade 4 adverse event was observed, and main adverse events included fever (95."( Irinotecan eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization using Callispheres® microspheres is an effective and safe approach in treating unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Bian, J; Liu, S; Wang, R; Wu, J; Zhang, Y; Zhao, G; Zhao, T; Zhou, J, 2022
)
2.16
" Patients exhibiting EWL had worse survival and higher frequencies of adverse events."( Early weight loss is an independent risk factor for shorter survival and increased side effects in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing first-line treatment within the randomized Phase III trial FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306).
Algül, H; Decker, T; Erickson, NT; Gesenhues, AB; Heinemann, V; Heintges, T; Höffkes, HG; Holch, JW; Kahl, C; Kaiser, F; Kiani, A; Kullmann, F; Lerch, MM; Link, H; Liu, L; Michl, M; Modest, DP; Moehler, M; Ricard, I; Scheithauer, W; Stintzing, S; Theurich, S; von Weikersthal, LF, 2022
)
0.72
" However, its strong adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities, tend to reduce the patients' life qualities and to limit the clinical use of CPT-11."( Selenium-enriched Bifidobacterium longum DD98 attenuates irinotecan-induced intestinal and hepatic toxicity in vitro and in vivo.
Chen, D; Gao, F; Kan, S; Lu, C; Qian, Z; Yin, Y; Zhu, H, 2021
)
0.87
" Associations between PK exposure and the incidence of diarrhea (grade ≥3) and neutropenia adverse events (AEs) (grade ≥3) at first event in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) were investigated using logistic regression based on data from two studies (the phase III NAPOLI-1 [N = 260] and phase I/II NCT02551991 [N = 56] trials)."( Population pharmacokinetics of liposomal irinotecan in patients with cancer and exposure-safety analyses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Bekaii-Saab, T; Boland, PM; Brendel, K; Dayyani, F; Dean, A; Macarulla, T; Maxwell, F; Mody, K; Pedret-Dunn, A; Wainberg, ZA; Zhang, B, 2021
)
0.89
" Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were more frequently observed in group O (90 vs."( Comparison of safety and efficacy of fluorouracil + oxaliplatin + irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) and modified FOLFOXIRI with bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: data from clinical practice.
Aoyama, T; Kazama, K; Numata, M; Oshima, T; Rino, Y; Sato, M; Sato, S; Shiozawa, M; Sugano, N; Tamagawa, H; Uchiyama, M; Yukawa, N, 2022
)
0.96
"In this study, IR had some toxic effects in rat testis tissue; these effects were ameliorated by CRC treatment."( Curcumin protects against testis-specific side effects of irinotecan.
Aydın, M; Başak, N; Çetin, A; Çiftci, O; Gökhan Turtay, M; Gürbüz, Ş; Oğuztürk, H; Uyanık, Ö; Yücel, N, 2021
)
0.87
"Chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs) can negatively impact the care of patients."( Real-world safety and supportive care use of second-line 5-fluorouracil-based regimens among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Cockrum, P; Kim, G; Surinach, A; Wainberg, Z; Wang, S, 2022
)
0.72
"In patients with mPDAC who received second-line therapy, those who received liposomal irinotecan-based regimens had the lowest rates of anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia compared to FOLFIRI, FOLFIRINOX, and FOLFOX, while requiring a similar or lower level of medication to treat and manage those adverse events."( Real-world safety and supportive care use of second-line 5-fluorouracil-based regimens among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Cockrum, P; Kim, G; Surinach, A; Wainberg, Z; Wang, S, 2022
)
0.94
" Pooled analyses for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TRAEs) were undertaken."( Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, X; Lu, W; Tang, K; Wang, L, 2022
)
0.72
" However, grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequently reported in patients administered FOLFIRINOX compared with the other three regimens."( Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, X; Lu, W; Tang, K; Wang, L, 2022
)
0.72
" We assessed the indicators of tumour response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events."( Treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using transarterial chemoembolisation with irinotecan-eluting beads: analysis of efficacy and safety.
Liu, D; Ma, Z; Wang, J; Wen, Z; Xie, H; Yang, X; Zhang, N; Zhao, Y, 2022
)
0.94
" Transient elevation of the aminotransferase level, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fever, and hyper-bilirubinaemia were common adverse events in patients with unresectable ICC treated with DEB-TACE with CalliSphere beads (CBs)."( Treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using transarterial chemoembolisation with irinotecan-eluting beads: analysis of efficacy and safety.
Liu, D; Ma, Z; Wang, J; Wen, Z; Xie, H; Yang, X; Zhang, N; Zhao, Y, 2022
)
0.94
"DEB-TACE with CBs is a safe and well-tolerated therapy in patients with unresectable ICC with a low incidence of adverse events and relatively prolonged survival."( Treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using transarterial chemoembolisation with irinotecan-eluting beads: analysis of efficacy and safety.
Liu, D; Ma, Z; Wang, J; Wen, Z; Xie, H; Yang, X; Zhang, N; Zhao, Y, 2022
)
0.94
" The association between the occurrence of severe adverse events, pharmacokinetics parameters, and UGT1A1 and CYP3A4 predicted phenotypes was evaluated, as the evaluation of [SN-38]/IRI dose ratio as predictor of severe adverse events."( Evaluation of UGT1A1 and CYP3A Genotyping and Single-Point Irinotecan and Metabolite Concentrations as Predictors of the Occurrence of Adverse Events in Cancer Treatment.
Antunes, MV; Basso, J; Hahn, RZ; Ibaldi, MR; Linden, R; Pavei, CC; Schaefer, VD; Schwartsmann, G, 2023
)
1.15
" Data on adverse event was reported."( Evaluation of UGT1A1 and CYP3A Genotyping and Single-Point Irinotecan and Metabolite Concentrations as Predictors of the Occurrence of Adverse Events in Cancer Treatment.
Antunes, MV; Basso, J; Hahn, RZ; Ibaldi, MR; Linden, R; Pavei, CC; Schaefer, VD; Schwartsmann, G, 2023
)
1.15
"5%) developed grade 3/4 adverse events."( Evaluation of UGT1A1 and CYP3A Genotyping and Single-Point Irinotecan and Metabolite Concentrations as Predictors of the Occurrence of Adverse Events in Cancer Treatment.
Antunes, MV; Basso, J; Hahn, RZ; Ibaldi, MR; Linden, R; Pavei, CC; Schaefer, VD; Schwartsmann, G, 2023
)
1.15
" We followed up these patients and analyzed the relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and chemotherapy-induced adverse events (AEs)."( A Single-Center Retrospective Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Modified FOLFIRINOX with S-1 as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in 71 Patients with Resected Pancreatic Carcinoma.
Dai, H; Feng, W; Tang, C; Yao, L, 2022
)
0.72
" The rate of adverse reactions such as hematological toxicity, neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, nonhematological toxicity, vomiting, fatigue, infection, diarrhea, intestinal obstruction, and peripheral neuropathy was lower in 10."( Efficacy, Safety, and Impact on Patient Survival of PDL1/PD-1 Inhibitors versus FOLFIRINOX Regimens for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.
Dai, S; Jiang, C; Wu, Z; Zhou, L, 2022
)
0.72
"PDL1/PD-1 inhibitors in combination with FOLFIRINOX regimens have shown longer survival than treatment with FOLFIRINOX regimens for pancreatic cancer patients, with reliable clinical efficacy, tolerable adverse effects, and a high safety profile for patients."( Efficacy, Safety, and Impact on Patient Survival of PDL1/PD-1 Inhibitors versus FOLFIRINOX Regimens for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.
Dai, S; Jiang, C; Wu, Z; Zhou, L, 2022
)
0.72
" The prognosis, predictive factors (including systemic inflammation-based prognostic indicators), and adverse events were investigated."( Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Nano-Liposomal Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil/L-Leucovorin in Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Study.
Aihara, R; Araki, K; Hatanaka, T; Hosaka, H; Hoshino, T; Hosouchi, Y; Ijima, M; Ishida, F; Ishii, N; Kakizaki, S; Kobatake, T; Kurihara, E; Naganuma, A; Shirabe, K; Suzuki, Y; Tamura, Y; Uraoka, T; Yasuoka, H; Yoshida, S, 2022
)
0.97
" Adverse events were manageable, although gastrointestinal symptoms and neutropenia were observed."( Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Nano-Liposomal Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil/L-Leucovorin in Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Study.
Aihara, R; Araki, K; Hatanaka, T; Hosaka, H; Hoshino, T; Hosouchi, Y; Ijima, M; Ishida, F; Ishii, N; Kakizaki, S; Kobatake, T; Kurihara, E; Naganuma, A; Shirabe, K; Suzuki, Y; Tamura, Y; Uraoka, T; Yasuoka, H; Yoshida, S, 2022
)
0.97
" The adverse events were also analyzed."( Safety and efficacy of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (XELOXIRI) regimen with or without targeted drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Gao, L; Liu, X; Ma, X; Ou, K; Wang, Q; Yang, L; Zhang, H, 2022
)
1.03
" The incidence of any grade of adverse events (AEs) was 96."( Safety and efficacy of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (XELOXIRI) regimen with or without targeted drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Gao, L; Liu, X; Ma, X; Ou, K; Wang, Q; Yang, L; Zhang, H, 2022
)
1.03
"Gastrointestinal mucositis (GIM) is a side effect of high-dose irinotecan (CPT-11), causing debilitating symptoms that are often poorly managed."( Effects of a novel toll-like receptor 4 antagonist IAXO-102 in a murine model of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.
Bowen, JM; Coller, JK; Crame, EE; Elz, AS; Prestidge, CA; Tam, JSY; Wignall, A, 2022
)
0.96
" The criteria  for the inclusion of studies were previously defined based on the two secondary goals addressed in this review: 1) To analyze the magnitude of the differences  in clinical responses and 2) To study the magnitude of the differences in  adverse effects of irinotecan at high doses, as compared to the doses  described in the summary of product characteristics corresponding to the  FOLFIRI regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with genotypes  UGT1A1*1/* 1 or *1/*28."( Efficacy and safety of high doses of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with the FOLFIRI regimen based on the UGT1A1 genotype: A systematic review.
García-Gil, S; Gutiérrez-Nicolás, F; Miarons, M; Riera, P, 2022
)
1.17
"Our results provide preliminary evidence that HAIC based on FOLFIRI regimen is efficient and safe in some patients progressing after previous treatment."( The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Based on FOLFIRI for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma as Second-Line and Successive Treatment: A Real-World Study.
Chen, Y; Huang, P; Huang, X; Shi, G; Sun, Q; Yang, G; Zhou, Y, 2022
)
0.72
" No unexpected adverse events clinically, or permanent end-organ damage during postmortem examination was identified in glioma subjects who had received standard or prolonged duration of BEV, TMZ or TIB regimen-based chemotherapies except rare events of bone marrow suppression."( Postmortem study of organ-specific toxicity in glioblastoma patients treated with a combination of temozolomide, irinotecan and bevacizumab.
Ballester, LY; Bhattacharjee, MB; Brown, RE; Buja, LM; Chen, L; Glass, WF; Hergenroeder, GW; Hunter, RL; Linendoll, N; Lu, G; Pilichowska, M; Pillai, AK; Rao, M; Tian, X; Wu, JK; Zhang, R; Zhu, JJ; Zhu, P, 2022
)
0.93
"03) was associated with adverse PFS."( A nationwide evaluation of bevacizumab-based treatments in pediatric low-grade glioma in the UK: Safety, efficacy, visual morbidity, and outcomes.
Ahmed, R; Bailey, S; Bowman, R; Carceller, F; Collins, R; Corley, E; D'Arco, F; Dahl, C; English, M; Green, K; Hargrave, D; Howells, L; Jorgensen, M; Kamal, A; Kilday, JJ; Lowis, S; Lumb, B; O'Hare, P; Opocher, E; Pace, E; Panagopoulou, P; Patel, P; Picton, S; Pizer, B; Shafiq, A; Slater, O; Uzunova, L; Walters, B; Wayman, H; Wilson, S, 2023
)
0.91
" Most commonly, it is associated with coronary vasospasm secondary to direct toxic effects on vascular endothelium."( Managing life-threatening 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity.
Boldig, K; Ganguly, A; Kadakia, M; Rohatgi, A, 2022
)
0.72
" However, severe adverse effects due to irinotecan have been observed even in patients who do not harbor UGT1A1*28 or *6."( Association between a single nucleotide polymorphism in the R3HCC1 gene and irinotecan toxicity.
Hamamoto, Y; Hazama, S; Iida, M; Ioka, T; Kanesada, K; Matsui, H; Nagano, H; Ogihara, H; Shindo, Y; Suzuki, N; Takeda, S; Tokumitsu, Y; Tsunedomi, R; Yoshida, S, 2023
)
1.41
"We analyzed the incidence, time to first onset, and time to resolution for adverse events that require special attention and other selected toxicities in the nal-IRI combination group (n = 46)."( Liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin after gemcitabine-based therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: additional safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial.
Furuse, J; Furuya, M; Ikeda, M; Ioka, T; Okusaka, T; Teng, Z; Ueno, M, 2023
)
1.31
"3%) were the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events, with a median time to onset of 21."( Liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin after gemcitabine-based therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: additional safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial.
Furuse, J; Furuya, M; Ikeda, M; Ioka, T; Okusaka, T; Teng, Z; Ueno, M, 2023
)
1.31
" Although the treatment-emergent adverse events occurred were controllable, patients with prolonged toxicities should be closely managed."( Liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin after gemcitabine-based therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: additional safety analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial.
Furuse, J; Furuya, M; Ikeda, M; Ioka, T; Okusaka, T; Teng, Z; Ueno, M, 2023
)
1.31
" Using Clalit Health Services electronic medical records (including laboratory results) we ascertained hematological and gastrointestinal adverse effects and mortality, within 90 days of the first dose, as a composite outcome."( Association Between ABCG2, ABCB1, ABCC2 Efflux Transporter Single-Nucleotide Variants and Irinotecan Adverse Effects in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Real-Life Study.
Barnett-Griness, O; Gronich, N; Lejbkowicz, F; Pinchev, M; Rennert, G; Saliba, W, 2023
)
1.13
" Inhibition of gut microbial glucuronidase may also prevent adverse GI effects of CPT-11 in patients on opioids."( Opioid-induced microbial dysbiosis disrupts irinotecan (CPT-11) metabolism and increases gastrointestinal toxicity in a murine model.
Abu, YF; Chen, C; Meng, J; Ramakrishnan, S; Roy, S; Tao, J; Xie, Y; Yan, Y; Zhang, Y; Zhou, Y, 2023
)
1.17
" None of the patients discontinued the study due to adverse events."( Safety and efficacy of trastuzumab biosimilar plus irinotecan or gemcitabine in patients with previously treated HER2 (ERBB2)-positive non-breast/non-gastric solid tumors: a phase II basket trial with circulating tumor DNA analysis.
Ahn, JH; Chun, SM; Hong, YS; Hyung, J; Jang, JP; Jeon, S; Jeong, JH; Jun, HR; Jung, CK; Kim, J; Kim, JE; Kim, TW; Lee, JY; Yoo, C; Yoon, S, 2023
)
1.16
"Trastuzumab plus irinotecan or gemcitabine was safe and feasible for patients with previously treated HER2-positive advanced solid tumors with modest efficacy outcomes, and ctDNA analysis was useful for detecting HER2 amplification."( Safety and efficacy of trastuzumab biosimilar plus irinotecan or gemcitabine in patients with previously treated HER2 (ERBB2)-positive non-breast/non-gastric solid tumors: a phase II basket trial with circulating tumor DNA analysis.
Ahn, JH; Chun, SM; Hong, YS; Hyung, J; Jang, JP; Jeon, S; Jeong, JH; Jun, HR; Jung, CK; Kim, J; Kim, JE; Kim, TW; Lee, JY; Yoo, C; Yoon, S, 2023
)
1.5

Pharmacokinetics

Irinotecan was administered to 65 cancer patients as a 90-min infusion (dose, 200-350 mg/m(2), and pharmacokinetic data were obtained during the first cycle. Body-surface area (BSA) is not a predictor of irinotecans pharmacokinetics.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" A total of 64 pharmacokinetic sets (> or = 24-h sampling) were obtained in phase I studies at doses ranging from 50 to 750 mg/m2 (0."( Limited sampling models for simultaneous estimation of the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38.
Chabot, GG, 1995
)
0.52
"A linear two-compartment Bayesian pharmacokinetic model was developed using a standard two-stage population method for the novel anti-cancer agent CPT-11 from 11 adult patients with refractory cancer."( Efficient sampling strategies for forecasting pharmacokinetic parameters of irinotecan (CPT-11): implication for area under the concentration-time curve monitoring.
Arioka, H; Eguchi, K; Karato, A; Lieberman, R; Nakashima, H; Nomura, N; Ohmatsu, H; Shinkai, T; Shiraishi, J; Tamura, T, 1995
)
0.52
" The relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic effects was also investigated to elucidate the cause of interpatient variation in side effects."( A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38.
Eguchi, K; Hakusui, H; Miya, T; Mizuno, S; Morita, M; Ohe, Y; Saijo, N; Sasaki, Y; Shinkai, T; Tamura, T, 1995
)
0.29
"The objective of this study was to develop a limited sampling model (LSM) to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) of 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11) and that of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) as predictive pharmacokinetic variables for leukopenia and episodes of diarrhea induced by CPT-11 administration."( A limited sampling model for estimating pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and its metabolite SN-38.
Fujii, H; Igarashi, T; Itoh, K; Miyata, Y; Mizuno, S; Ohtsu, T; Saijo, N; Sasaki, Y; Sekine, I; Wakita, H, 1995
)
0.29
" During these trials the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), were investigated to evaluate the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and diarrhea, since this is an unpredictable and severe toxicity of combination chemotherapy using CPT-11 and cisplatin."( Relationship between the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and diarrhea during combination chemotherapy with cisplatin.
Fukuoka, M; Hirashima, T; Kudoh, S; Kusunoki, Y; Masuda, N; Matsui, K; Nakagawa, K; Negoro, S; Takifuji, N; Yoshikawa, A, 1995
)
0.55
"We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of Irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with refractory solid malignancies."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered daily for three consecutive days every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Catimel, G; Chabot, GG; Clavel, M; Cote, C; Dumortier, A; Engel, C; Gouyette, A; Guastalla, JP; Mahjoubi, M; Mathieu-Boué, A, 1995
)
0.76
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using model-independent and model-dependent analyses."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and active metabolite SN-38 during phase I trials.
Abigerges, D; Armand, JP; Bugat, R; Catimel, G; Chabot, GG; Culine, S; de Forni, M; Extra, JM; Hérait, P; Mahjoubi, M, 1995
)
0.54
"168 pharmacokinetic data sets were obtained in 107 patients (97 first courses, 43 second courses, 23 third courses, 4 fourth courses, and 1 fifth course)."( Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and active metabolite SN-38 during phase I trials.
Abigerges, D; Armand, JP; Bugat, R; Catimel, G; Chabot, GG; Culine, S; de Forni, M; Extra, JM; Hérait, P; Mahjoubi, M, 1995
)
0.54
"In this study, we aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for CPT-11 and to use the Bayesian method to estimate CPT-11 pharmacokinetic parameters in each of 43 patients who received combined therapy consisting of CPT-11 and etoposide."( CPT-11: population pharmacokinetic model and estimation of pharmacokinetics using the Bayesian method in patients with lung cancer.
Arioka, H; Eguchi, K; Karato, A; Nakashima, H; Ohe, Y; Oshita, F; Shinkai, T; Tamura, T; Uenaka, K; Yamamoto, N, 1994
)
0.29
" In all cases, considerable effort has gone into detailed pharmacokinetic studies conducted before and during the clinical phase I studies."( Pharmacokinetics and early clinical studies of selected new drugs.
Cassidy, J; Graham, MA; Jodrell, D; Kaye, SB; Workman, P, 1993
)
0.29
"We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of CPT-11 (irinotecan) to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory solid malignancies."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly CPT-11.
Burris, HA; Eckardt, JR; Hilsenbeck, SG; Kuhn, JG; Nelson, J; Rodriguez, GI; Rothenberg, ML; Smith, LS; Tristan-Morales, M; Weiss, GR, 1993
)
0.53
" To clarify the pharmacokinetic difference between CPT-11 and SN-38, the plasma levels, tissue distribution and excretion of SN-38 were investigated after dosing rats with 14C-labeled SN-38."( Pharmacokinetics of SN-38 [(+)-(4S)-4,11-diethyl-4,9-dihydroxy-1H- pyrano[3',4':6,7]-indolizino[1,2-b]quinoline-3,14(4H,12H)-dione], an active metabolite of irinotecan, after a single intravenous dosing of 14C-SN-38 to rats.
Atsumi, R; Hakusui, H; Okazaki, O, 1995
)
0.49
"To construct limited-sampling models (LSMs) for irinotecan (CPT-11) pharmacokinetic (PK) measures."( Limited-sampling models for irinotecan pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics: prediction of biliary index and intestinal toxicity.
Gupta, E; Mick, R; Ratain, MJ; Vokes, EE, 1996
)
0.84
"A pharmacokinetic study was performed during a phase II clinical trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) to confirm the pharmacokinetic profile of this drug and its metabolite and to investigate interpatient and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variations and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan during a phase II clinical trial in colorectal cancer. Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Adenis, A; Brunet, R; Bugat, R; Canal, P; Dezeuze, A; Douillard, JY; Gay, C; Herait, P; Lokiec, F; Mathieu-Boue, A, 1996
)
0.79
" No relationship was identified between any pharmacokinetic parameter and delayed diarrhea or therapeutic outcome."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan during a phase II clinical trial in colorectal cancer. Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Adenis, A; Brunet, R; Bugat, R; Canal, P; Dezeuze, A; Douillard, JY; Gay, C; Herait, P; Lokiec, F; Mathieu-Boue, A, 1996
)
0.56
" The relationship between neutropenia and both CPT-11 and SN-38 pharmacokinetic parameters confirms the results of previous studies."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan during a phase II clinical trial in colorectal cancer. Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Adenis, A; Brunet, R; Bugat, R; Canal, P; Dezeuze, A; Douillard, JY; Gay, C; Herait, P; Lokiec, F; Mathieu-Boue, A, 1996
)
0.56
" On day 1 of treatment, CPT-11 alone was given by 90-minute infusion, and pharmacokinetic sampling was performed over 24 hours."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Berkery, R; Dietz, A; Eng, M; Kanowitz, J; Kelsen, DP; Kemeny, NE; Locker, P; Saltz, LB; Schaaf, L; Spriggs, D; Staton, BA; Steger, C, 1996
)
0.55
"We conducted a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of irinotecan (CPT-11) and determined the effect of race and sex on disposition and toxicity of CPT-11."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan in cancer patients.
Gupta, E; Lestingi, TM; Mick, R; Ramirez, J; Ratain, MJ; Vokes, EE; Wang, X, 1997
)
0.76
" Plasma concentrations can be described using a 2- or 3-compartment model with a mean terminal half-life ranging from 5 to 27 hours."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.
Chabot, GG, 1997
)
0.59
"To examine the pharmacokinetic relationships between humans and monkeys, we studied the disposition of 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11) and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), in rhesus monkeys."( Pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 in rhesus monkeys.
Hakusui, H; Inaba, M; Ishii, H; Ito, K; Mizuno, N; Ohnishi, Y; Sudoh, K; Sugiyama, Y; Tanioka, Y; Yoshida, Y, 1998
)
0.3
"CPT-11 was administered to a total of six monkeys at doses of 3, 7, 15 and 25 mg/kg by intravenous infusion for 10 min and plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of CPT-11 determined."( Pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 in rhesus monkeys.
Hakusui, H; Inaba, M; Ishii, H; Ito, K; Mizuno, N; Ohnishi, Y; Sudoh, K; Sugiyama, Y; Tanioka, Y; Yoshida, Y, 1998
)
0.3
" Mean values of systemic clearance, mean residence time and distribution volume at steady state, the major pharmacokinetic parameters for CPT-11, were 13."( Pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 in rhesus monkeys.
Hakusui, H; Inaba, M; Ishii, H; Ito, K; Mizuno, N; Ohnishi, Y; Sudoh, K; Sugiyama, Y; Tanioka, Y; Yoshida, Y, 1998
)
0.3
"The clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan (CPT11) can be described by a 2 or 3 compartment model, a mean terminal half-life of 12 hours, a volume of distribution at steady state of 168 l/m2 and a total body clearance of 15 l/m2/h."( [Irinotecan pharmacokinetics].
Canal, P; Chabot, GG; Lokiec, F; Robert, J, 1998
)
1.49
"We conducted a phase I dose-escalation trial of orally administered irinotecan (CPT-11) to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory malignancies."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of oral irinotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors.
Drengler, RL; Elfring, GL; Hammond, LA; Hodges, S; Kraynak, MA; Kuhn, JG; Locker, PK; Miller, LL; Rodriguez, GI; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Staton, BA; Stephenson, JA; Villalona-Calero, MA; Von Hoff, DD, 1999
)
0.8
" The biologic activity and favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics make oral administration of CPT-11 an attractive option for further clinical development."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of oral irinotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors.
Drengler, RL; Elfring, GL; Hammond, LA; Hodges, S; Kraynak, MA; Kuhn, JG; Locker, PK; Miller, LL; Rodriguez, GI; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Staton, BA; Stephenson, JA; Villalona-Calero, MA; Von Hoff, DD, 1999
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetics permits the prediction of the occurrence of iatrogenic toxicities taking into account the interpatient variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters."( [Usefulness of a pharmacokinetic approach for clinical antineoplastic chemotherapy evaluation].
Lokiec, F, 1999
)
0.3
"The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of cisplatin and irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and to characterize the pharmacokinetic profiles of CPT-11 and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38)."( Cisplatin in combination with irinotecan in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: a pilot phase II clinical trial and pharmacokinetic profile.
Chahinian, AP; Higashino, K; Miyake, M; Nakano, T; Ninomiya, K; Shinjo, M; Togawa, N; Tonomura, A; Yamamoto, T, 1999
)
0.81
" These data indicate that the toxicity of the combination CPT-11 and CDDP is schedule independent and that there is no mutual pharmacokinetic interaction."( Drug-administration sequence does not change pharmacodynamics and kinetics of irinotecan and cisplatin.
Brouwer, E; de Boer-Dennert, MM; de Bruijn, P; de Jonge, MJ; Planting, AS; Sparreboom, A; Stoter, G; van der Burg, ME; Vernillet, L; Verweij, J, 1999
)
0.53
" No plasmatic pharmacokinetic interactions were detected."( Combination of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: results of two independent phase I studies with pharmacokinetics.
Besmaine, A; Cuvier, C; Cvitkovic, E; Dupont-André, G; Goldwasser, F; Kalla, S; Lokiec, F; Mahjoubi, M; Marty, M; Méry-Mignard, D; Misset, JL; Ouldkaci, M; Wasserman, E, 1999
)
0.59
" For pharmacokinetic analysis, serial plasma samples were obtained on days 1 through 3 of the first cycle."( Pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and pharmacodynamic profiles in a dose-escalating study of irinotecan and cisplatin.
Brouwer, E; de Boer-Dennert, MM; de Bruijn, P; de Jonge, MJ; Jacques, C; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; van Alphen, RJ; Vernillet, L; Verweij, J, 2000
)
0.53
"Irinotecan and cisplatin demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics comparable to that observed with single-agent administration, which suggests an absence of pharmacokinetic interaction."( Pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and pharmacodynamic profiles in a dose-escalating study of irinotecan and cisplatin.
Brouwer, E; de Boer-Dennert, MM; de Bruijn, P; de Jonge, MJ; Jacques, C; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; van Alphen, RJ; Vernillet, L; Verweij, J, 2000
)
1.97
"There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between irinotecan and cisplatin in this study."( Pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and pharmacodynamic profiles in a dose-escalating study of irinotecan and cisplatin.
Brouwer, E; de Boer-Dennert, MM; de Bruijn, P; de Jonge, MJ; Jacques, C; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; van Alphen, RJ; Vernillet, L; Verweij, J, 2000
)
0.77
" Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors: preliminary evidence of clinical activity.
Adjei, AA; Alberts, SR; Atherton, P; Erlichman, C; Goldberg, RM; Hanson, LJ; Kastrissios, H; Klein, CE; Pitot, HC; Reid, JM; Rubin, J; Sloan, JA, 2000
)
0.82
" When judging from apparent simple pharmacokinetic analysis, an inconsistency was found between the in vitro drug release and the plasma level to a fair extent, but overall the in vivo drug release rate from microspheres was considered parallel to the in vitro one."( Pharmacokinetics of prolonged-release CPT-11-loaded microspheres in rats.
Hata, H; Kurita, A; Machida, Y; Morikawa, A; Onishi, H, 2000
)
0.31
" Plasma decay is biphasic with a terminal half-life of 11."( Simple and rapid determination of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 in plasma by high-performance liquid-chromatography: application to clinical pharmacokinetic studies.
Aldaz, A; Calvo, E; Castellanos, C; Escoriaza, J; Giráldez, J, 2000
)
0.59
"A Phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its active metabolites when given on a once-every-3-week schedule."( Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) using a once-every-three-week dosing schedule for patients with advanced solid tumor malignancy.
Adjei, AA; Alberts, SA; Burch, PA; Elfring, G; Erlichman, C; Goldberg, RM; Miller, LL; Pitot, HC; Reid, JM; Rubin, J; Schaaf, LJ; Skaff, PA; Sloan, JA, 2000
)
0.77
" The sequence of drug administration produced no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of irinotecan or SN-38, which were similar to the values reported when irinotecan is administered alone."( Dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced cancer.
Burtness, BA; Cheng, Y; DiStasio, SA; Leffert, JJ; Li, X; McKeon, A; Murren, JR; Peccerillo, K; Pizzorno, G, 2000
)
0.78
"We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Armand, JP; Bruno, R; Couteau, C; Ducreux, M; Lebecq, A; Lefresne-Soulas, F; Lokiec, F; Risse, ML; Riva, A; Rougier, P; Ruffié, P, 2000
)
0.78
" That of Cmax of CPT-11 included sex and BMI (F=8."( Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of CPT-11: the body mass index, age and sex are independent predictors of pharmacokinetic parameters of CPT-11.
Fujii, H; Goya, T; Igarashi, T; Itoh, K; Minami, H; Miya, T; Ohtsu, T; Sasaki, Y, 2001
)
0.31
"Individual plasma-converting enzyme activity was measured in 20 adult cancer patients participating in a pharmacokinetic and phase I clinical trial of a prolonged 96-h intravenous infusion of irinotecan."( Human plasma carboxylesterase and butyrylcholinesterase enzyme activity: correlations with SN-38 pharmacokinetics during a prolonged infusion of irinotecan.
Band, R; Bowen, D; Cottrell, J; Grem, JL; Guemei, AA; Hehman, H; Ismail, AS; Pavlov, MV; Prudhomme, M; Takimoto, CH; Taylor, RE, 2001
)
0.7
" Pharmacokinetic variations in the relative exposure to SN-38 did not correlate with the measured carboxylesterase-converting enzyme activity nor with plasma butyrylcholinesterase activity in our patient population."( Human plasma carboxylesterase and butyrylcholinesterase enzyme activity: correlations with SN-38 pharmacokinetics during a prolonged infusion of irinotecan.
Band, R; Bowen, D; Cottrell, J; Grem, JL; Guemei, AA; Hehman, H; Ismail, AS; Pavlov, MV; Prudhomme, M; Takimoto, CH; Taylor, RE, 2001
)
0.51
" Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its metabolites was performed after each cycle."( Sequence effect of irinotecan and fluorouracil treatment on pharmacokinetics and toxicity in chemotherapy-naive metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Allegrini, G; Comis, S; Conte, P; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Lencioni, M; Masi, G; Pfanner, E, 2001
)
0.93
" Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the administration sequence significantly affected the SN-38 area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), which was 40."( Sequence effect of irinotecan and fluorouracil treatment on pharmacokinetics and toxicity in chemotherapy-naive metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Allegrini, G; Comis, S; Conte, P; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Lencioni, M; Masi, G; Pfanner, E, 2001
)
0.64
" As a surrogate for the UGT activity, the polymorphic frequency distribution of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios of SN-38 to SN-38G (AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G)) using pooled pharmacokinetic data from four independent study groups in Japan was explored."( Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.
Ando, Y; Hasegawa, Y; Ichiki, M; Shimokata, K; Sugiyama, T; Ueoka, H, 2002
)
0.55
"This trial was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan (CPT-11) when administered on a once-every-2-week schedule."( Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every two weeks.
Eckhardt, SG; Elfring, GL; Hammond, LA; Hodges, S; Kuhn, JG; Locker, PK; Miller, LL; Petit, RG; Rinaldi, DA; Rodriguez, GI; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Sharma, A; Villalona-Calero, MA; von Hoff, DD, 2001
)
0.77
" No predictive correlation was observed between CPT-11 or SN-38 peak concentration or AUC and first-cycle diarrhea, neutropenia, nausea, or vomiting."( Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every two weeks.
Eckhardt, SG; Elfring, GL; Hammond, LA; Hodges, S; Kuhn, JG; Locker, PK; Miller, LL; Petit, RG; Rinaldi, DA; Rodriguez, GI; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Sharma, A; Villalona-Calero, MA; von Hoff, DD, 2001
)
0.56
" We performed a Phase I and pharmacokinetic study to investigate CPT-11 by hepatic arterial administration in patients with liver metastases."( Continuous administration of irinotecan by hepatic arterial infusion: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study.
Gall, H; Giaccone, G; Gruia, G; Kedde, MA; Leisink, JM; Pinedo, HM; van der Vijgh, WJ; van Groeningen, CJ; van Riel, JM, 2002
)
0.61
"We performed PMC-CPT-11 therapy (modified pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy plus irinotecan, or modified PMC) in a case of sigmoid colon cancer with local invasion and multiple hepatic metastases."( [A case of hepatic metastasis from rectal carcinoma successfully treated with pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (PMC)-CPT-11 therapy].
Chang, W; Kondo, Y; Kosaka, H; Maeda, S; Matsusaka, S; Okada, T; Oriyama, T, 2002
)
0.54
" He was treated postoperatively with arterial infusion pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (PMC) and venous infusion CPT-11 (modified PMC)."( [A case of rectal cancer with multiple liver metastases that responded dramatically to pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy/CPT-11 therapy].
Dan, T; Kitayama, Y; Kosaka, H; Maeda, S; Matsusaka, S; Okada, T; Tanabe, H; Yamasaki, H, 2002
)
0.31
"We have shown previously that the terminal disposition half-life of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, is much longer than earlier thought."( Irinotecan pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics: the clinical relevance of prolonged exposure to SN-38.
de Bruijn, P; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Nooter, K; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J, 2002
)
1.97
"To build population pharmacokinetic (PK) models for irinotecan (CPT-11) and its currently identified metabolites."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites: a population analysis.
Karlsson, MO; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Xie, R, 2002
)
0.86
"The interconversion between the lactone and carboxylate forms of CPT-11 was relatively rapid, with an equilibration half-life of 14 minutes in the central compartment and hydrolysis occurring at a rate five times faster than lactonization."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites: a population analysis.
Karlsson, MO; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Xie, R, 2002
)
0.61
" The aims of the study were to evaluate the linearity of CPT-11 pharmacokinetics and the influence of the schedule of administration of CPT-11 in mice, using a population pharmacokinetic approach with the NON-linear Mixed Effects Model (NONMEM) program."( Non-linear pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in mice.
Canal, P; Chatelut, E; Guichard, S; Rouits, E, 2002
)
0.6
"Our objective was to build population pharmacokinetic models that describe plasma concentrations of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its metabolites 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) and to investigate the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships between drug exposure and diarrhea, the major dose-limiting toxicity."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in relation with diarrhea.
Karlsson, MO; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Xie, R, 2002
)
0.82
" The population pharmacokinetic models were developed to describe plasma concentration-time profiles."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in relation with diarrhea.
Karlsson, MO; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Xie, R, 2002
)
0.61
"A 3-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described the disposition of irinotecan, whereas SN-38 and SN-38G showed 2-compartmental characteristics."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in relation with diarrhea.
Karlsson, MO; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Xie, R, 2002
)
0.84
" No pharmacologic interactions were observed between these agents, and no correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity were noted."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with raltitrexed.
Adams, AL; Brady, D; Engstrom, PF; Gallo, JM; Kilpatrick, D; Lewis, NL; Litwin, S; Meropol, NJ; Scher, R; Szarka, CE; Weiner, LM, 2002
)
0.59
"To determine the recommended dose (RD) and the pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan and its metabolites in cancer patients with hyperbilirubinemia."( Dosage adjustment and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan in cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction.
Armand, JP; Boige, V; Ducreux, M; Faivre, S; Gatineau, M; Jacques, C; Raymond, E; Rixe, O; Sanderink, GJ; Vernillet, L, 2002
)
0.8
" Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the relative increase in exposure was likely caused by reduced biliary excretion."( Dosage adjustment and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan in cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction.
Armand, JP; Boige, V; Ducreux, M; Faivre, S; Gatineau, M; Jacques, C; Raymond, E; Rixe, O; Sanderink, GJ; Vernillet, L, 2002
)
0.57
"The objective of the study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model for irinotecan and 2 of its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G)."( Population pharmacokinetic model for irinotecan and two of its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide.
Atherton, PJ; Gupta, E; Kastrissios, H; Klein, CE; Pitot, HC; Ratain, MJ; Reid, JM; Sloan, JA, 2002
)
0.81
" Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were obtained by compartmental methods to describe the disposition of metabolites that are dependent on the disposition of the parent compound."( Population pharmacokinetic model for irinotecan and two of its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide.
Atherton, PJ; Gupta, E; Kastrissios, H; Klein, CE; Pitot, HC; Ratain, MJ; Reid, JM; Sloan, JA, 2002
)
0.59
"The validated population pharmacokinetic model describing the disposition of irinotecan and 2 of its metabolites should facilitate the design of future studies to elucidate the relative contributions of the parent compound and SN-38 to the pharmacologic and toxic effects of irinotecan therapy."( Population pharmacokinetic model for irinotecan and two of its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide.
Atherton, PJ; Gupta, E; Kastrissios, H; Klein, CE; Pitot, HC; Ratain, MJ; Reid, JM; Sloan, JA, 2002
)
0.82
" To clarify the pharmacokinetic effects of different CPT-11 administration schedules, we compared two different regimens (continuous infusion of CPT-11 for 24 h and CPT-11 infusion for 90 min) combined with CDDP in patients with advanced gastric cancer."( Pharmacokinetic study of two infusion schedules of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Fujitani, K; Hirao, M; Tsujinaka, T, 2003
)
0.57
"To assess the safety and toxicity profile of escalating doses of intravenous irinotecan, in combination with a fixed dose of oral ciclosporin (Cs) and to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan and its metabolites."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous irinotecan plus oral ciclosporin in patients with fuorouracil-refractory metastatic colon cancer.
Braun, MS; Button, CJ; Cheeseman, SL; Chester, JD; Davis, T; Hall, GD; Joel, SP; Perry, J; Seymour, MT, 2003
)
0.8
" Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma irinotecan and its metabolites SN38 and SN38G was performed during paired cycles with and without Cs."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous irinotecan plus oral ciclosporin in patients with fuorouracil-refractory metastatic colon cancer.
Braun, MS; Button, CJ; Cheeseman, SL; Chester, JD; Davis, T; Hall, GD; Joel, SP; Perry, J; Seymour, MT, 2003
)
0.85
" Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that irinotecan clearance was reduced from 13."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous irinotecan plus oral ciclosporin in patients with fuorouracil-refractory metastatic colon cancer.
Braun, MS; Button, CJ; Cheeseman, SL; Chester, JD; Davis, T; Hall, GD; Joel, SP; Perry, J; Seymour, MT, 2003
)
0.84
" Dose-limiting diarrhea was not seen during this study, supporting the hypothesis that pharmacokinetic modulation of irinotecan by Cs may improve its therapeutic index."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous irinotecan plus oral ciclosporin in patients with fuorouracil-refractory metastatic colon cancer.
Braun, MS; Button, CJ; Cheeseman, SL; Chester, JD; Davis, T; Hall, GD; Joel, SP; Perry, J; Seymour, MT, 2003
)
0.78
"To assess the antitumour activity and safety profile of irinotecan and its pharmacokinetic interactions with anticonvulsants in patients with glioblastoma multiforme."( Multicentre phase II study and pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naïve patients with glioblastoma.
Armand, JP; Boige, V; Fabbro, M; Faivre, S; Frenay, M; Germa, C; Raymond, E; Rixe, O; Rodier, JM; Sicard, E; Vassal, G; Vernillet, L, 2003
)
0.81
"This multicentre phase II and pharmacokinetic study investigated the effects of irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) given as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks either prior to (group A) or after relapse following radiotherapy (group B) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with glioblastoma."( Multicentre phase II study and pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naïve patients with glioblastoma.
Armand, JP; Boige, V; Fabbro, M; Faivre, S; Frenay, M; Germa, C; Raymond, E; Rixe, O; Rodier, JM; Sicard, E; Vassal, G; Vernillet, L, 2003
)
0.79
" There were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of total CPT-11 between treatment groups (p>0."( The modulation of irinotecan-induced diarrhoea and pharmacokinetics by three different classes of pharmacologic agents.
Cheung, YB; Chowbay, B; Lee, EJ; Sharma, A; Zhou, QY,
)
0.47
" For the 6 patients who received EIAs but whose SN-38 areas under the concentration-time curve (AUCs) on Day 1 were below clinically significant levels, irinotecan dosage was increased, and subsequent pharmacokinetic studies were performed."( Effect of intrapatient dosage escalation of irinotecan on its pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients who have high-grade gliomas and receive enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy.
Bowers, DC; Chintagumpala, MM; Crews, KR; Gajjar, A; Jones-Wallace, D; Stewart, CF, 2003
)
0.78
" This was consistent with pharmacokinetic data indicating that the total body clearance (CL) of irinotecan in this patient population was considerably greater than in colorectal cancer patients."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma.
Batchelor, T; Fisher, JD; Gilbert, MR; Grossman, S; Lesser, G; Piantadosi, S; Supko, JG, 2003
)
0.8
" Pharmacokinetic studies showed that the CL of irinotecan was distinctly dose dependent in the patients receiving EIAs, decreasing from approximately 50 liters/h/m(2) at the lower dose levels (125-238 mg/m(2)) to a mean +/- SD value of 29."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma.
Batchelor, T; Fisher, JD; Gilbert, MR; Grossman, S; Lesser, G; Piantadosi, S; Supko, JG, 2003
)
0.83
" These findings have important implications for subsequent clinical trials to further evaluate irinotecan in brain cancer patients and underscore the importance of assessing the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions between concurrent medications and chemotherapeutic agents."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma.
Batchelor, T; Fisher, JD; Gilbert, MR; Grossman, S; Lesser, G; Piantadosi, S; Supko, JG, 2003
)
0.8
"Irinotecan was administered to 65 cancer patients as a 90-min infusion (dose, 200-350 mg/m(2)), and pharmacokinetic data were obtained during the first cycle."( Irinotecan pathway genotype analysis to predict pharmacokinetics.
Baker, SD; Karlsson, MO; Marsh, S; Mathijssen, RH; McLeod, HL; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Xie, R, 2003
)
3.2
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were not related to any of the other multiple variant genotypes, possibly because of the low allele frequency."( Irinotecan pathway genotype analysis to predict pharmacokinetics.
Baker, SD; Karlsson, MO; Marsh, S; Mathijssen, RH; McLeod, HL; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Xie, R, 2003
)
1.76
" Pharmacokinetic and neurotoxicity assessments were performed at the cohort 2 MTD."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two different schedules of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with solid tumors.
Adjei, AA; Ames, MM; Atherton, P; Erlichman, C; Galanis, E; Goetz, MP; Goldberg, RM; Pitot, H; Reid, JM; Rubin, J; Sloan, JA; Windebank, AJ, 2003
)
0.55
"The developed assay can be used to determine pharmacokinetic parameters for CPT-11, SN-38, SN-38 G, APC, and NPC in plasma and saliva from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( Sensitive HPLC-fluorescence method for irinotecan and four major metabolites in human plasma and saliva: application to pharmacokinetic studies.
Astre, C; Bressolle, F; Culine, S; Malosse, F; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Ychou, M, 2003
)
0.59
" The parameters of the pharmacodynamic model are related to the growth characteristics of the tumor, to the drug potency, and to the kinetics of the tumor cell death."( Predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tumor growth kinetics in xenograft models after administration of anticancer agents.
Cammia, C; Croci, V; De Nicolao, G; Germani, M; Magni, P; Pesenti, E; Poggesi, I; Rocchetti, M; Simeoni, M, 2004
)
0.32
" In 8 patients, plasma levels of irinotecan and its metabolites SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38glu) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and main pharmacokinetic parameters, including steady-state concentration, area under the time-concentration curve, and clearance, were calculated and normalized to the dose level of 22."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan given as a 7-day continuous infusion in metastatic colorectal cancer patients pretreated with 5-fluorouracil or raltitrexed.
Allegrini, G; Barbara, C; Cupini, S; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Masi, G, 2004
)
0.87
" The pharmacokinetic data provided evidence that continuous infusion increased the metabolism of irinotecan to SN-38 with respect to standard 30/90-min administration."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan given as a 7-day continuous infusion in metastatic colorectal cancer patients pretreated with 5-fluorouracil or raltitrexed.
Allegrini, G; Barbara, C; Cupini, S; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Masi, G, 2004
)
0.81
"Weekly administration of docetaxel has demonstrated comparable efficacy together with a distinct toxicity profile with reduced myelosuppression, although pharmacokinetic data with weekly regimens are lacking."( Comparative pharmacokinetics of weekly and every-three-weeks docetaxel.
Baker, SD; Brahmer, JR; Carducci, MA; Lee, CK; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Wolff, AC; Zabelina, Y; Zhao, M, 2004
)
0.32
" With extended plasma sampling beyond 24 h post-infusion, docetaxel clearance was 18% lower and the terminal half-life was 5-fold longer."( Comparative pharmacokinetics of weekly and every-three-weeks docetaxel.
Baker, SD; Brahmer, JR; Carducci, MA; Lee, CK; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Wolff, AC; Zabelina, Y; Zhao, M, 2004
)
0.32
" He was treated with pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (PMC) and low-dose CPT-11."( [A case of highly advanced ascending colon cancer with multiple bone and liver metastases and pleuritis carcinomatosa treated with pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy and low-dose CPT-11].
Aihara, T; Fukuhara, A; Kouno, T; Murayama, M; Nakagawa, K; Nakamura, E; Niida, M; Nishimoto, Y; Nozaki, H; Syouda, S; Watanabe, Y; Yagyu, T; Yasuoka, H, 2004
)
0.32
" Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on cycle 1 and 2 to assess the best sequence and detect any interaction between the two drugs."( Oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and FU-FOL combination and pharmacokinetic analysis in advanced colorectal cancer patients.
Adam, R; Bastian, G; Bismuth, H; Castaing, D; Gil-Delgado, MA; Guinet, F; Khayat, D; Rocher, MA; Spano, JP; Taillibert, S; Urien, S, 2004
)
0.66
" Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained on day 1 of the first and second cycles."( A phase I study and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Fujiwara, K; Hisamoto, A; Hosokawa, S; Hotta, K; Kiura, K; Kozuki, T; Kuyama, S; Satoh, K; Tabata, M; Tanimoto, M; Ueoka, H, 2004
)
0.59
" In the pharmacokinetic analysis, the maximum concentration of paclitaxel was elevated in a dose-dependent manner."( A phase I study and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan (CPT-11) and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Fujiwara, K; Hisamoto, A; Hosokawa, S; Hotta, K; Kiura, K; Kozuki, T; Kuyama, S; Satoh, K; Tabata, M; Tanimoto, M; Ueoka, H, 2004
)
0.59
"In a previous analysis, it was shown that body-surface area (BSA) is not a predictor of irinotecan pharmacokinetic parameters."( Flat-fixed dosing of irinotecan: influence on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability.
de Jong, FA; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Xie, R, 2004
)
0.86
" Irinotecan pharmacokinetic investigations were performed before ifosfamide (day 1), after 3 days of ifosfamide (day 3), and 9 days after the end of ifosfamide (day 12)."( Effect of fractionated ifosfamide on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma.
Crews, KR; Daw, NC; Liu, T; Rodriguez-Galindo, C; Santana, VM; Stewart, CF, 2004
)
1.48
" The method was successfully used to quantify SN-38 in plasma and tissues samples for pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution studies of LE-SN38 in mice."( A simple and sensitive LC/MS/MS assay for 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) in mouse plasma and tissues: application to pharmacokinetic study of liposome entrapped SN-38 (LE-SN38).
Abu-Qare, A; Ahmad, A; Ahmad, I; Guo, W; Khan, S; Wang, YF, 2005
)
0.33
" Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that there was no interaction between oral irinotecan and capecitabine, and that body-surface area was not significantly contributing to the observed pharmacokinetic variability."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral irinotecan given once daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in combination with capecitabine in patients with solid tumors.
Assadourian, S; deJonge, MJ; Dumez, H; Eskens, FA; Sanderink, GJ; Selleslach, J; Semiond, D; Soepenberg, O; Sparreboom, A; ter Steeg, J; van Oosterom, AT; Verweij, J, 2005
)
0.82
"To characterize the maximum-tolerated dose, recommended dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetic profile, and food effect of orally administered irinotecan formulated as new semisolid matrix capsules."( Phase I pharmacokinetic, food effect, and pharmacogenetic study of oral irinotecan given as semisolid matrix capsules in patients with solid tumors.
Assadourian, S; de Jong, FA; de Jonge, MJ; Dumez, H; Eskens, FA; Lefebvre, P; Sanderink, GJ; Selleslach, J; Soepenberg, O; Sparreboom, A; Ter Steeg, J; Thomas, J; van Oosterom, AT; van Schaik, RH; Verweij, J, 2005
)
0.76
" This study confirms that oral administration of irinotecan is feasible and may have favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics."( Phase I pharmacokinetic, food effect, and pharmacogenetic study of oral irinotecan given as semisolid matrix capsules in patients with solid tumors.
Assadourian, S; de Jong, FA; de Jonge, MJ; Dumez, H; Eskens, FA; Lefebvre, P; Sanderink, GJ; Selleslach, J; Soepenberg, O; Sparreboom, A; Ter Steeg, J; Thomas, J; van Oosterom, AT; van Schaik, RH; Verweij, J, 2005
)
0.82
" The current study, undertaken in 27 patients with gastrointestinal tumours, aimed to assess the toxicity and potential for significant pharmacokinetic interactions of a combination regimen incorporating capecitabine with 3-weekly irinotecan (XELIRI)."( A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine (Xeloda) and irinotecan combination therapy (XELIRI) in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal tumours.
Bertheault-Cvitkovic, F; Bugat, R; Canal, P; Chatelut, E; Cornen, X; Delord, JP; Dieras, V; Guimbaud, R; Lochon, I; Lokiec, F; Mery-Mignard, D; Mouri, Z; Pierga, JY; Turpin, FL, 2005
)
0.74
" The objectives of this study were to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan administered weekly for four consecutive weeks every 42 days, to describe toxicities of this regimen, and to perform a pharmacokinetic analysis to evaluate changes in drug disposition as a function of dose as well as repeated dosing."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of docetaxel and irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule.
Beringer, P; Garcia, AA; Iqbal, S; Jeffers, S; Lenz, HJ; Louie, S; Pujari, M, 2005
)
0.78
" There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between day 1 and day 22 (n=20)."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of docetaxel and irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule.
Beringer, P; Garcia, AA; Iqbal, S; Jeffers, S; Lenz, HJ; Louie, S; Pujari, M, 2005
)
0.57
" In this study, the effect of methylselenocysteine on pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic profiles of genes relevant to CPT-11 metabolic pathway was evaluated to identify possible mechanisms associated with the observed combinational synergy."( Irinotecan pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic alterations induced by methylselenocysteine in human head and neck xenograft tumors.
Azrak, RG; Cao, S; Durrani, FA; Li, X; McLeod, HL; Pendyala, L; Rustum, YM; Shannon, WD; Smith, PF; Yu, J, 2005
)
1.77
"Human pharmacokinetic parameters are often predicted prior to clinical study from in vivo preclinical pharmacokinetic data."( Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
Jolivette, LJ; Ward, KW, 2005
)
0.33
" In addition, we aimed to explore the pharmacokinetic parameters of irinotecan and capecitabine when used in different sequences of administration, with irinotecan infusion either prior to or after the first intake of capecitabine."( A phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Bakker, JM; Falk, S; Groenewegen, G; Kerr, DJ; Maughan, T; Nortier, JW; Punt, CJ; Rea, DW; Richel, DJ; Semiond, D; Smit, JM; Steven, N; Ten Bokkel Huinink, WW, 2005
)
0.83
" Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in patients treated at the recommended dose in two cohorts of patients in which the sequence of the first administration of each drug was reversed."( A phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Bakker, JM; Falk, S; Groenewegen, G; Kerr, DJ; Maughan, T; Nortier, JW; Punt, CJ; Rea, DW; Richel, DJ; Semiond, D; Smit, JM; Steven, N; Ten Bokkel Huinink, WW, 2005
)
0.59
" The pharmacokinetic data suggest that the sequence of administration does not impact significantly on the metabolism of the two drugs."( A phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Bakker, JM; Falk, S; Groenewegen, G; Kerr, DJ; Maughan, T; Nortier, JW; Punt, CJ; Rea, DW; Richel, DJ; Semiond, D; Smit, JM; Steven, N; Ten Bokkel Huinink, WW, 2005
)
0.59
" The body weight loss, gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities induced by CPT-11, and the pharmacokinetic parameters of CPT-11 were evaluated in rats pretreated with SJW or vehicle."( St. John's Wort modulates the toxicities and pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 (irinotecan) in rats.
Chan, E; Chan, SY; Chen, X; Duan, W; Ho, PC; Hu, Z; Huang, M; Li, X; Xu, C; Yang, H; Yang, X; Zhou, S; Zhu, YZ, 2005
)
0.56
"This trial assessed pharmacokinetic interactions between cetuximab and irinotecan."( Pharmacokinetic profile of cetuximab (Erbitux) alone and in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced EGFR-positive adenocarcinoma.
Bonnay, M; Delbaldo, C; Dieras, V; Faivre, S; Kovar, A; Laurence, V; Mueser, M; Nolting, A; Pierga, JY; Raymond, E; Vedovato, JC, 2005
)
0.79
" Both CPT-11 and CCB need to be activated by human carboxyl esterases, therefore a probable pharmacokinetic drug interaction was checked."( Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of irinotecan combined with capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Czejka, M; Hauer, K; Ostermann, E; Schueller, J,
)
0.41
"We studied the toxicities, potential pharmacokinetic interactions, and preliminary antitumor activity of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan with celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel, irinotecan, and celecoxib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Argiris, A; Avram, MJ; Kut, V; Luong, L, 2006
)
0.79
" The alteration of irinotecan pharmacokinetic parameters observed may not be clinically relevant."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel, irinotecan, and celecoxib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Argiris, A; Avram, MJ; Kut, V; Luong, L, 2006
)
0.92
"The novel fluoro-substituted camptothecin analog, BMS-286309, and its prodrug, BMS-422461, were evaluated for their pharmacologic, toxicologic, metabolic and pharmacokinetic developmental potential."( Novel fluoro-substituted camptothecins: in vivo antitumor activity, reduced gastrointestinal toxicity and pharmacokinetic characterization.
Balasubramanian, BN; Fairchild, CR; Jang, GR; Long, B; Marathe, PH; Monticello, TM; Rose, WC; Wall, ME; Wani, MC, 2006
)
0.33
"In vitro and in vivo assays were used to assess the compounds for topoisomerase I activity, antitumor activity, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and pharmacokinetic parameters."( Novel fluoro-substituted camptothecins: in vivo antitumor activity, reduced gastrointestinal toxicity and pharmacokinetic characterization.
Balasubramanian, BN; Fairchild, CR; Jang, GR; Long, B; Marathe, PH; Monticello, TM; Rose, WC; Wall, ME; Wani, MC, 2006
)
0.33
" The pharmacokinetic profile in rat blood demonstrated that BMS-422461 was rapidly cleaved to BMS-286309."( Novel fluoro-substituted camptothecins: in vivo antitumor activity, reduced gastrointestinal toxicity and pharmacokinetic characterization.
Balasubramanian, BN; Fairchild, CR; Jang, GR; Long, B; Marathe, PH; Monticello, TM; Rose, WC; Wall, ME; Wani, MC, 2006
)
0.33
"The favorable in vivo metabolic activation of BMS-422461, and the pharmacokinetic characteristics of BMS-286309, suggest that the good efficacy of BMS-422461 is derived from robust in vivo release of BMS-286309 in rodents and the likelihood that this biotransformation will be preserved in humans."( Novel fluoro-substituted camptothecins: in vivo antitumor activity, reduced gastrointestinal toxicity and pharmacokinetic characterization.
Balasubramanian, BN; Fairchild, CR; Jang, GR; Long, B; Marathe, PH; Monticello, TM; Rose, WC; Wall, ME; Wani, MC, 2006
)
0.33
" These results indicate that bevacizumab can be safely administered in combination with the Saltz regimen without pharmacokinetic interaction."( Concomitant administration of bevacizumab, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin: nonclinical safety and pharmacokinetics.
Bricarello, A; Christian, BJ; Gaudreault, J; Mounho, B; Shiu, V; Zuch, CL,
)
0.39
" Pharmacokinetic studies of irinotecan and its metabolites 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), 7-ethyl-10-[3,4,5-trihydroxy-pyran-2-carboxylic acid]-camptothecin (SN-38-glucuronide), and 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin were done during the first three irinotecan administrations."( Effect of milk thistle (Silybum marianum) on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.
Baker, SD; Gelderblom, H; Guchelaar, HJ; Nortier, JW; Rudek, MA; Sparreboom, A; van Erp, NP; Zhao, M, 2005
)
0.86
"Forty patients and 75 pharmacokinetic time-courses were available for analysis."( Pharmacokinetic modelling of 5-FU production from capecitabine--a population study in 40 adult patients with metastatic cancer.
Lokiec, F; Rezaí, K; Urien, S, 2005
)
0.33
"To assess the feasibility and antitumor activity of oblimersen sodium, an antisense oligonucleotide directed to the Bcl-2 mRNA, combined with irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, characterize the pharmacokinetic behavior of both oblimersen sodium and irinotecan, and examine Bcl-2 protein inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)."( A phase I, pharmacokinetic and biologic correlative study of oblimersen sodium (Genasense, G3139) and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Berg, K; Hammond, LA; Izbicka, E; Kuhn, J; Mita, MM; Ochoa, L; Patnaik, A; Rowinsky, EK; Schwartz, G; Tolcher, AW; Yeh, IT, 2006
)
0.75
" For irinotecan, SN-38, APC and NPC, similar pharmacokinetic profiles were observed from plasma and saliva data."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan and its metabolites from plasma and saliva data in patients with metastatic digestive cancer receiving Folfiri regimen.
Abderrahim, AG; Astre, C; Bressolle, F; Duffour, J; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Ychou, M, 2006
)
1.11
" Pharmacokinetic studies were done for selenium and irinotecan and its metabolites."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of fixed-dose selenomethionine and irinotecan in solid tumors.
Azrak, RG; Badmaev, V; Creaven, PJ; Fakih, MG; Lawrence, D; Pendyala, L; Prey, JD; Reid, ME; Rustum, YM; Smith, PF, 2006
)
0.82
" The long half-life of selenium resulted in a prolonged accumulation towards steady-state concentrations."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of fixed-dose selenomethionine and irinotecan in solid tumors.
Azrak, RG; Badmaev, V; Creaven, PJ; Fakih, MG; Lawrence, D; Pendyala, L; Prey, JD; Reid, ME; Rustum, YM; Smith, PF, 2006
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were recorded for 46 patients."( A phase I dose-finding clinical pharmacokinetic study of an oral formulation of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours.
Assadourian, S; Awada, A; de Boeck, G; de Bruijn, EA; Dumez, H; Guetens, G; Maes, RA; Piccart, M; Semiond, D; van Oosterom, A, 2006
)
0.56
" The pharmacokinetic analysis were performed on 16 patients."( Irinotecan in combination with thalidomide in patients with advanced solid tumors: a clinical study with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation.
Allegrini, G; Amatori, F; Bocci, G; Cerri, E; Cupini, S; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Marcucci, L; Masi, G, 2006
)
1.78
" This study aimed to investigate whether combination of thalidomide modulated the toxicities of CPT-11 using a rat model and the possible role of the altered pharmacokinetic component in the toxicity modulation using in vitro models."( Pharmacokinetic mechanisms for reduced toxicity of irinotecan by coadministered thalidomide.
Bian, JS; Boelsterli, UA; Chan, E; Chan, SY; Chen, YZ; Duan, W; Ho, PC; Hu, ZP; Huang, M; Ng, KY; Yang, XX; Zhou, SF, 2006
)
0.59
" The study also sought to detect major pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between these agents and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid malignancies."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed plus irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
Beeram, M; Chu, Q; De Bono, J; Forouzesh, B; Hammond, LA; Hong, S; John, W; Latz, JE; Nguyen, B; Rowinsky, EK; Schwartz, G, 2007
)
0.59
" No major pharmacokinetic interactions between the agents were evident."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed plus irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
Beeram, M; Chu, Q; De Bono, J; Forouzesh, B; Hammond, LA; Hong, S; John, W; Latz, JE; Nguyen, B; Rowinsky, EK; Schwartz, G, 2007
)
0.59
" Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed during both treatments."( Medicinal cannabis does not influence the clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and docetaxel.
de Bruijn, P; de Jong, FA; Engels, FK; Kitzen, JJ; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Mathot, RA; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J, 2007
)
0.57
"The purpose of this study was to investigate the maximum tolerated doses, dose-limiting toxicities, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profiles in the combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of combination chemotherapy using irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with lung cancer.
Asai, G; Fukuoka, M; Kurata, T; Nakagawa, K; Tamura, K; Uejima, H; Yamamoto, N, 2006
)
0.77
" The long half-life (292."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of UCN-01 in combination with irinotecan in patients with solid tumors.
Baker, SD; Carducci, MA; Dancey, J; Donehower, RC; Hidalgo, M; Jimeno, A; Laheru, DA; Messersmith, WA; Purcell, T; Rudek, MA, 2008
)
0.58
"Associations between UGT1A haplotypes and the area under concentration curve ratio (SN-38 glucuronide/SN-38) or toxicities were analyzed in 177 Japanese cancer patients treated with irinotecan as a single agent or in combination chemotherapy."( Irinotecan pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and UGT1A genetic polymorphisms in Japanese: roles of UGT1A1*6 and *28.
Hamaguchi, T; Kaniwa, N; Kubota, K; Minami, H; Ohmatsu, H; Ohtsu, A; Ozawa, S; Saeki, M; Sai, K; Saijo, N; Saito, Y; Sawada, J; Shirao, K; Suzuki, K; Yamada, Y; Yamamoto, N; Yoshida, T, 2007
)
1.97
"Among diplotypes of UGT1A genes, patients with the haplotypes harboring UGT1A1*6 or *28 had significantly reduced area under concentration curve ratios, with the effects of UGT1A1*6 or *28 being of a similar scale."( Irinotecan pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and UGT1A genetic polymorphisms in Japanese: roles of UGT1A1*6 and *28.
Hamaguchi, T; Kaniwa, N; Kubota, K; Minami, H; Ohmatsu, H; Ohtsu, A; Ozawa, S; Saeki, M; Sai, K; Saijo, N; Saito, Y; Sawada, J; Shirao, K; Suzuki, K; Yamada, Y; Yamamoto, N; Yoshida, T, 2007
)
1.78
"The haplotypes significantly associated with reduced area under concentration curve ratios and neutropenia contained UGT1A1*6 or *28, and both of them should be genotyped before irinotecan is given to Japanese and probably other Asian patients."( Irinotecan pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and UGT1A genetic polymorphisms in Japanese: roles of UGT1A1*6 and *28.
Hamaguchi, T; Kaniwa, N; Kubota, K; Minami, H; Ohmatsu, H; Ohtsu, A; Ozawa, S; Saeki, M; Sai, K; Saijo, N; Saito, Y; Sawada, J; Shirao, K; Suzuki, K; Yamada, Y; Yamamoto, N; Yoshida, T, 2007
)
1.97
" Toxicity and pharmacokinetic results were evaluated during courses 1 and 2 of irinotecan therapy."( UGT1A1 promoter genotype correlates with SN-38 pharmacokinetics, but not severe toxicity in patients receiving low-dose irinotecan.
Billups, C; Fraga, CH; Furman, WL; Gajjar, A; Liu, T; McGregor, LM; O'Shaughnessy, MA; Owens, T; Panetta, JC; Rodriguez-Galindo, C; Stewart, CF; Throm, SL, 2007
)
0.78
" The clinical consequences of these substantial pharmacokinetic changes should be investigated."( Lopinavir-ritonavir dramatically affects the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in HIV patients with Kaposi's sarcoma.
Corona, G; Innocenti, F; Sandron, S; Sartor, I; Tirelli, U; Toffoli, G; Vaccher, E, 2008
)
0.58
" Co-administration of lapatinib increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, by an average of 41%; no other pharmacokinetic interactions were observed."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of lapatinib in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan.
Flaherty, KT; Fleming, RA; Kerr, DJ; Koch, KM; Middleton, MR; Midgley, RS; O'Dwyer, PJ; Pratap, SE; Smith, DA; Stevenson, JP; Versola, M; Ward, C, 2007
)
0.76
" Here, we report on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of this combination in a cancer patient."( Irinotecan chemotherapy during valproic acid treatment: pharmacokinetic interaction and hepatotoxicity.
de Jong, FA; Kitzen, JJ; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Mathôt, RA; van den Bent, MJ; van der Bol, JM; Verweij, J, 2007
)
1.78
" Blood samples for pharmacokinetic purposes were drawn during a course with and a course without concomitant valproic acid."( Irinotecan chemotherapy during valproic acid treatment: pharmacokinetic interaction and hepatotoxicity.
de Jong, FA; Kitzen, JJ; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Mathôt, RA; van den Bent, MJ; van der Bol, JM; Verweij, J, 2007
)
1.78
"In this study we propose for the first time a limited sampling strategy to estimate the individual pharmacokinetic parameters of both irinotecan and SN-38 in patients treated with the irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) regimen."( A limited sampling strategy to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of irinotecan and its active metabolite, SN-38, in patients with metastatic digestive cancer receiving the FOLFIRI regimen.
Abderrahim, AG; Bressolle, FM; Duffour, J; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Ychou, M, 2007
)
0.77
" Three sequential skin biopsies were obtained in selected patients to assess the pharmacodynamic effects on EGFR signaling of FOLFIRI alone and with EKB-569."( Phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of EKB-569, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of patients with
Abbas, R; Andreu, J; Baselga, J; Casado, E; Cortes-Funes, H; Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lejeune, C; Marimón, I; Paz-Ares, L; Quinn, S; Rojo, F; Salazar, R; Tabernero, J; Ubbelohde, U; Zacharchuk, C, 2008
)
0.54
" Chemotherapy alone interferes with pharmacodynamic markers, an observation to be taken into account in future studies of targeted agents with chemotherapy."( Phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of EKB-569, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of patients with
Abbas, R; Andreu, J; Baselga, J; Casado, E; Cortes-Funes, H; Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lejeune, C; Marimón, I; Paz-Ares, L; Quinn, S; Rojo, F; Salazar, R; Tabernero, J; Ubbelohde, U; Zacharchuk, C, 2008
)
0.54
"To define an integrated pharmacogenetic model for predicting irinotecan pharmacokinetic (PK) and severe toxicity, we evaluated multivariate analysis using 15 polymorphisms within seven genes with putative influence on metabolism and transport of irinotecan."( Integrated pharmacogenetic prediction of irinotecan pharmacokinetics and toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Han, JY; Lee, JS; Lee, SY; Lim, HS; Park, YH, 2009
)
0.86
"To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its major metabolites in children with cancer and to identify covariates that predict variability in disposition."( Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in pediatric cancer patients: a report from the children's oncology group.
Barrett, J; Bernstein, ML; Blaney, SM; Bomgaars, L; Gupta, M; Mondick, J; Rosner, GL; Thompson, PA; Yu, A, 2008
)
0.92
"A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using plasma concentration data from 82 patients participating in a multicenter Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) single agent phase II clinical trial."( Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites in pediatric cancer patients: a report from the children's oncology group.
Barrett, J; Bernstein, ML; Blaney, SM; Bomgaars, L; Gupta, M; Mondick, J; Rosner, GL; Thompson, PA; Yu, A, 2008
)
0.67
" Although genes involved in irinotecan pharmacokinetics have been shown to influence toxicity, there are no data on pharmacodynamic genes."( Irinotecan pharmacogenetics: influence of pharmacodynamic genes.
Altes, A; Baiget, M; Culverhouse, R; Hoskins, JM; Marcuello, E; Marsh, S; Maxwell, T; McLeod, HL; Paré, L; Van Booven, DJ, 2008
)
2.08
"This is the first comprehensive pharmacogenetic investigation of irinotecan pharmacodynamic factors, and our findings suggest that genetic variation in the pharmacodynamic genes may influence the efficacy of irinotecan-containing therapies in advanced colorectal cancer patients."( Irinotecan pharmacogenetics: influence of pharmacodynamic genes.
Altes, A; Baiget, M; Culverhouse, R; Hoskins, JM; Marcuello, E; Marsh, S; Maxwell, T; McLeod, HL; Paré, L; Van Booven, DJ, 2008
)
2.03
"To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the combination of weekly oxaliplatin x 4, weekly irinotecan x 4 and capecitabine Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle in patients with solid tumors; to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of these agents in this combination; to observe patients for clinical anti-tumor response."( Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine.
Brell, JM; Cooney, MM; Dowlati, A; Egorin, MJ; Gibbons, J; Hoppel, CL; Ingalls, ST; Ivy, SP; Krishnamurthi, SS; Li, X; Overmoyer, BA; Remick, SC; Schluchter, MD; Weaver, KC; Zuhowski, EG, 2009
)
0.8
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"Enterohepatic recirculation of irinotecan and one of its metabolites, SN-38, has been observed in pharmacokinetic data sets from previous studies."( Enterohepatic recirculation model of irinotecan (CPT-11) and metabolite pharmacokinetics in patients with glioma.
Friedman, HS; Malone, S; Petros, WP; Schaaf, LJ; Younis, IR, 2009
)
0.91
" Pharmacokinetic models were developed and tested for simultaneous fit of parent drug and metabolites, including a recirculation component."( Enterohepatic recirculation model of irinotecan (CPT-11) and metabolite pharmacokinetics in patients with glioma.
Friedman, HS; Malone, S; Petros, WP; Schaaf, LJ; Younis, IR, 2009
)
0.63
"A recirculation chain incorporated in a multi-compartment pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its metabolites appears to improve characterization of this drug's disposition in patients with glioma."( Enterohepatic recirculation model of irinotecan (CPT-11) and metabolite pharmacokinetics in patients with glioma.
Friedman, HS; Malone, S; Petros, WP; Schaaf, LJ; Younis, IR, 2009
)
0.85
" The pharmacokinetic data indicate that the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) of CPT-11 and SN-38 were increased by 57."( Food-drug interaction of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and the metabolite SN-38.
Lin, LC; Tsai, TH; Wang, MN, 2008
)
0.57
" Because of the occurrence of toxicities due to the large interpatient variability in drug metabolism, irinotecan is a candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic optimisation."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients.
Bocci, G; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A, 2006
)
0.84
" In the present study, irinotecan showed an absolute bioavailability of 30% as calculated from the pharmacokinetic data."( Development and validation of reversed phase liquid chromatographic method utilizing ultraviolet detection for quantification of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its active metabolite, SN-38, in rat plasma and bile samples: application to pharmacokinetic studies.
Awasthi, A; Bansal, T; Jaggi, M; Khar, RK; Talegaonkar, S, 2008
)
0.86
" Potential pharmacokinetic interactions and Topo-1 and DT-diaphorase (NQ01) gene expressions in peripheral-mononuclear cells were evaluated."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of mitomycin C and celecoxib as potential modulators of tumor resistance to irinotecan in patients with solid malignancies.
Drengler, R; Duan, W; Kolesar, JM; Kuhn, J; Otterson, G; Schaaf, LJ; Shapiro, C; Villalona-Calero, MA; Xu, Y, 2009
)
0.56
" No relevant pharmacokinetic interactions occurred between irinotecan and MMC, and mean increases in Topo-1, were observed."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of mitomycin C and celecoxib as potential modulators of tumor resistance to irinotecan in patients with solid malignancies.
Drengler, R; Duan, W; Kolesar, JM; Kuhn, J; Otterson, G; Schaaf, LJ; Shapiro, C; Villalona-Calero, MA; Xu, Y, 2009
)
0.81
"This study aims at establishing relationships between genetic and non-genetic factors of variation of the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites; and also at establishing relationships between the pharmacokinetic or metabolic parameters and the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic determinants of the activity and toxicity of irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Boisdron-Celle, M; Charasson, V; Chatelut, E; Delord, JP; Fonck, M; Gamelin, E; Laurand, A; Morel, A; Pétain, A; Poirier, AL; Robert, J; Rouits, E, 2008
)
0.78
" Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on plasma samples collected at the first cycle of treatment."( A dose finding and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Antonuzzo, A; Bocci, G; Bursi, S; Chiara, S; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Fornaro, L; Loupakis, F; Masi, G; Pfanner, E; Vasile, E, 2009
)
0.57
" Large interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters of investigated drugs was observed."( A dose finding and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Antonuzzo, A; Bocci, G; Bursi, S; Chiara, S; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Fornaro, L; Loupakis, F; Masi, G; Pfanner, E; Vasile, E, 2009
)
0.57
" In addition, SN-38 showed significant change in oral pharmacokinetic parameters and minor changes in intravenous pharmacokinetic profile."( Effect of P-glycoprotein inhibitor, verapamil, on oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in rats.
Bansal, T; Jaggi, M; Khar, RK; Mishra, G; Talegaonkar, S, 2009
)
0.57
" Because the replacement of 2-day-infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) of FOLFIRI with oral tegafur-uracil/leucovorin (UFT/LV) would be highly beneficial for clinical management, we performed a phase I trial using oral UFT/LV and a pharmacokinetic evaluation."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of tegafur-uracil/leucovorin combined with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Azuma, T; Chayahara, N; Hirai, M; Inoue, Y; Kadowaki, Y; Kasuga, M; Maeda, T; Miki, I; Nishisaki, H; Okumura, K; Okuno, T; Sakaeda, T; Tamura, T; Tsuda, M; Yamamori, M, 2009
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic evaluation suggested continuous exposure to 5-FU by means of oral UFT/LV administration in this combination."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of tegafur-uracil/leucovorin combined with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Azuma, T; Chayahara, N; Hirai, M; Inoue, Y; Kadowaki, Y; Kasuga, M; Maeda, T; Miki, I; Nishisaki, H; Okumura, K; Okuno, T; Sakaeda, T; Tamura, T; Tsuda, M; Yamamori, M, 2009
)
0.57
" Univariate and multivariate models of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir and pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated."( Comprehensive pharmacogenetic analysis of irinotecan neutropenia and pharmacokinetics.
Chen, P; Das, S; Dolan, ME; Innocenti, F; Kroetz, DL; Ramírez, J; Ratain, MJ; Relling, M; Rosner, GL; Schuetz, E, 2009
)
0.62
" Coadministration of S-1 changed the pharmacokinetic behavior of CPT-11 and its metabolites."( Effects of oral administration of S-1 on the pharmacokinetics of SN-38, irinotecan active metabolite, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Hamada, A; Saito, H; Sasaki, Y; Tazoe, K; Yokoo, K, 2009
)
0.59
"A recent study found that variation in camptothecin pharmacodynamic genes (TOP1, PARP1, TDP1 and XRCC1) correlated with efficacy and risk of neutropenia in irinotecan-treated cancer patients (median dose: 180 mg/m2), which suggests that these genes might predict outcomes to irinotecan-based therapies."( Pharmacodynamic genes do not influence risk of neutropenia in cancer patients treated with moderately high-dose irinotecan.
Hoskins, JM; Innocenti, F; McLeod, HL; Ratain, MJ; Rosner, GL, 2009
)
0.76
"This phase I dose-escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of cetuximab administered on an every-second-week schedule to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, on the basis of safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation."( Cetuximab administered once every second week to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a two-part pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic phase I dose-escalation study.
Baselga, J; Cervantes, A; Ciardiello, F; Kisker, O; Liebscher, S; Macarulla, T; Martinelli, E; Ramos, FJ; Rivera, F; Rodriguez-Braun, E; Roselló, S; Tabernero, J; Vega-Villegas, ME, 2010
)
0.36
" We characterized its pharmacokinetic profile in nude mice bearing human SK-N-DZ and TE-671 cell lines."( Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics of oral gimatecan on pediatric cancer xenografts.
Cusano, G; D'Incalci, M; Di Francesco, AM; Forestieri, D; Meco, D; Patriarca, V; Pisano, C; Riccardi, R; Servidei, T; Zucchetti, M, 2010
)
0.36
" Enzyme kinetic parameters (K(m) and V(max)) and pharmacokinetic properties of three probe drugs were compared using wild-type and humanized UGT1 mice that express the Gilbert's UGT1A1*28 allele [Tg(UGT1(A1*28)) Ugt1(-/-) mice]."( A humanized UGT1 mouse model expressing the UGT1A1*28 allele for assessing drug clearance by UGT1A1-dependent glucuronidation.
Cai, H; Chen, S; Hotz, K; La Placa, DB; Nguyen, N; Peterkin, V; Stevens, JC; Tukey, RH; Yang, YS, 2010
)
0.36
" This method was used successfully to perform plasma pharmacokinetic studies of CPT11 after pulmonary artery embolization (PACE) in a sheep model."( Simple liquid chromatography method for the quantification of irinotecan and SN38 in sheep plasma: application to in vivo pharmacokinetics after pulmonary artery chemoembolization using drug eluting beads.
Baylatry, MT; Bengrine-Lefevre, L; Fernandez, C; Joly, AC; Laurent, A; Pelage, JP; Prugnaud, JL, 2010
)
0.6
" The pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and its metabolites were characterized using both traditional noncompartmental analysis and population pharmacokinetics using NONMEM VI; pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic relationships of SN-38 with indices of toxicity were also evaluated."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation of irinotecan hydrochloride in pediatric patients with recurrent or progressive solid tumors.
Barrett, JS; Ida, K; Ishida, Y; Kaneko, M; Kashiwase, S; Kimura, T; Kumagai, M; Makimoto, A; Mugishima, H; Nagatoshi, Y; Taga, T, 2010
)
0.61
" Pharmacokinetic parameters and consideration of relevant covariates (performance status (PS), BSA, corrected body weight (CBW), exponent of 3/4 on weight, etc."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation of irinotecan hydrochloride in pediatric patients with recurrent or progressive solid tumors.
Barrett, JS; Ida, K; Ishida, Y; Kaneko, M; Kashiwase, S; Kimura, T; Kumagai, M; Makimoto, A; Mugishima, H; Nagatoshi, Y; Taga, T, 2010
)
0.61
" This norrnothermic IP OPT-11 pharmacokinetic study performed in a pig model confirms the possibility to achieve at least a 30 times higher peritoneal than systemic exposure."( Pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal irinotecan in a pig model.
Drolet, P; Dubé, P; Sideris, L; Turcotte, S; Younan, R, 2010
)
0.64
" The biliary excretion, intestinal damage, and pharmacokinetic study of CPT-11-loaded PEO-PPO-PEO micelles were investigated in rats."( Effect of poly (ethylene oxide)-poly (propylene oxide)-poly (ethylene oxide) micelles on pharmacokinetics and intestinal toxicity of irinotecan hydrochloride: potential involvement of breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2).
Gan, L; Gan, Y; Guo, S; Zhang, X; Zhu, C, 2010
)
0.56
" The aim of our study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for CPT-11 and SN-38 following the intraperitoneal (IP) administration of CPT-11."( Population pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 (irinotecan) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding after its intraperitoneal administration.
Ahn, BJ; Choi, MK; Kang, WK; Ko, JW; Lee, J; Lim, HY; Park, JO; Park, SH; Park, YS; Yim, DS, 2010
)
0.63
" Several multicompartmental pharmacokinetic models were tested for CPT-11 and SN-38 in the sampled peritoneal fluid, plasma and urine."( Population pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 (irinotecan) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal seeding after its intraperitoneal administration.
Ahn, BJ; Choi, MK; Kang, WK; Ko, JW; Lee, J; Lim, HY; Park, JO; Park, SH; Park, YS; Yim, DS, 2010
)
0.63
" Because of the existence of some issues concerning the adoption of pharmacokinetic strategies to optimize CPT-11 dose and schedule, analyses of genetic polymorphisms seemed to offer a more reliable and safer approach for the identification of patients at risk than pharmacokinetics."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic predictive markers of irinotecan activity and toxicity.
Bocci, G; Danesi, R; Del Re, M; Di Desidero, T; Di Paolo, A; Lastella, M; Polillo, M, 2011
)
0.61
" Pharmacokinetic data when irinotecan was administered as a single agent in each arm were compared to data when the two study agents were co-administered using paired t tests."( The effect of thalidomide on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and metabolites in advanced solid tumor patients.
Cohen, EE; House, LK; Innocenti, F; Janisch, L; Karrison, T; Ramírez, J; Ratain, MJ; Wu, K, 2011
)
0.92
"The differences in pharmacokinetic parameters and metabolic markers after thalidomide administration were small and unlikely to be clinically significant."( The effect of thalidomide on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and metabolites in advanced solid tumor patients.
Cohen, EE; House, LK; Innocenti, F; Janisch, L; Karrison, T; Ramírez, J; Ratain, MJ; Wu, K, 2011
)
0.62
"The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic profile of liver-directed therapy with drug-eluting beads irinotecan (DEBIRI) in combination with systemic modified FOLFOX in the treatment of unresectable liver metastases in chemotherapy-naive patients with colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan drug-eluting beads in the treatment of chemo-naive unresectable colorectal liver metastasis with concomitant systemic fluorouracil and oxaliplatin: results of pharmacokinetics and phase I trial.
Martin, RC; Metzger, T; Schreeder, M; Scoggins, CR; Sharma, V; Tatum, C; Tomalty, D, 2012
)
2.02
" Pharmacokinetic data has demonstrated minimal detectable levels of irinotecan (18."( Irinotecan drug-eluting beads in the treatment of chemo-naive unresectable colorectal liver metastasis with concomitant systemic fluorouracil and oxaliplatin: results of pharmacokinetics and phase I trial.
Martin, RC; Metzger, T; Schreeder, M; Scoggins, CR; Sharma, V; Tatum, C; Tomalty, D, 2012
)
2.06
" This method was successfully applied to perform brain and plasma pharmacokinetic studies of CPT-11 and SN-38 in mice after intraperitoneal administration."( A new UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of irinotecan and 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) in mice: application to plasma and brain pharmacokinetics.
Farinotti, R; Fernandez, C; Goldwirt, L; Lemaitre, F; Zahr, N, 2012
)
0.63
" Pharmacokinetic analyses suggest sorafenib and metabolite exposure correlate with OS and DLTs."( Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of cetuximab, irinotecan and sorafenib in advanced colorectal cancer.
Arcaroli, J; Azad, N; Carducci, MA; Dasari, A; Diaz, LA; Donehower, RC; Hidalgo, M; Laheru, DA; McManus, M; Messersmith, WA; Quackenbush, K; Rudek, MA; Taylor, GE; Wright, JJ; Zhao, M, 2013
)
0.63
"The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the colon-targeted Irinotecan Hydrochloride (ITC-HCl) loaded microspheres by pharmacokinetic and biochemical studies."( Colorectal cancer targeted Irinotecan-Assam Bora rice starch based microspheres: a mechanistic, pharmacokinetic and biochemical investigation.
Ahmad, FJ; Ahmad, MZ; Akhter, S; Anwar, M; Kumar, A; Rahman, M; Talasaz, AH, 2013
)
0.92
" There was no overlap in drug plasma levels observed from the bead and IV treatments when given 24 h apart and no difference between the pharmacokinetic profiles of the two cycles separated by 3 weeks."( Feasibility, safety and pharmacokinetic study of hepatic administration of drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) followed by intravenous administration of irinotecan in a porcine model.
Chung, ST; Czuczman, P; Finnie, J; Foster, D; Holden, RR; Kuchel, T; Lewis, AL; Porter, S, 2013
)
0.6
" On the contrary, significant changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of SN-38 were not observed."( [Effect of tacrolimus on the pharmacokinetics and glucuronidation of SN-38, an active metabolite of irinotecan].
Fujioka, M; Hasegawa, T; Katoh, M; Nadai, M; Onishi, K; Sakakibara, Y; Tanaka, Y, 2013
)
0.61
" Pharmacokinetic studies were also evaluated."( UGT1A1 genotype-specific phase I and pharmacokinetic study for combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin: a Saitama Tumor Board study.
Furuya, K; Goto, T; Hirata, J; Horie, K; Kikuchi, Y; Kino, N; Kudoh, K; Takahashi, M; Takano, M; Yokota, H, 2013
)
0.61
" Six of the eight pharmacodynamic parameters assume the same value as in the corresponding single drug models."( A predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of tumor growth kinetics in xenograft mice after administration of anticancer agents given in combination.
Del Bene, F; Germani, M; Magni, P; Terranova, N, 2013
)
0.39
" This hypothesis-generating study shows that EGFR ligands are significantly modulated by cetuximab plus irinotecan according to KRAS and BRAF mutational status, and they warrant further investigation as pharmacodynamic markers of resistance to anti-EGFRs."( EGFR ligands as pharmacodynamic biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab and irinotecan.
Antoniotti, C; Basolo, F; Bocci, G; Canu, B; Cremolini, C; Danesi, R; Di Desidero, T; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Faviana, P; Fioravanti, A; Fontanini, G; Loupakis, F; Lupi, C; Masi, G; Orlandi, P; Salvatore, L; Schirripa, M; Sensi, E, 2014
)
0.83
" In the (TA)6/(TA)7 group, SN-38 peak concentration was correlated with CPT-11 starting dose and OS, valley concentration correlated with plasma bilirubin levels before CPT-11 treatment, delayed diarrhea, and OS."( Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai.
Cai, X; Cao, W; Ding, H; Liu, T; Wang, L; Wang, M; Xu, Q; Zhao, Z; Zhong, M; Zhou, X, 2013
)
0.63
" For the (TA)6/(TA)6 genotype, CPT-11 dosage can be increased gradually to improve efficacy for patients with SN-38 peak concentration ≤43."( Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai.
Cai, X; Cao, W; Ding, H; Liu, T; Wang, L; Wang, M; Xu, Q; Zhao, Z; Zhong, M; Zhou, X, 2013
)
0.63
"The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions of MK-0646 in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan were investigated in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Phase 1 pharmacokinetic study of MK-0646 (dalotuzumab), an anti-insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor monoclonal antibody, in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Doi, T; Feng, HP; Fuse, N; Muro, K; Noguchi, K; Ohtsu, A; Shimamoto, T; Takahari, D; Ura, T; Yoshino, T, 2013
)
0.8
"The pharmacokinetic biomodulation of irinotecan using oral ciclosporin does not improve the therapeutic index of irinotecan in advanced CRC."( A randomised phase III trial of the pharmacokinetic biomodulation of irinotecan using oral ciclosporin in advanced colorectal cancer: results of the Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal cancer therapy trial (PICCOLO).
Blake, D; Bridgewater, J; Brown, S; Chau, I; Gollins, S; Gwyther, S; Hill, M; Lowe, C; Maisey, N; Marshall, H; Maughan, T; Middleton, G; Myint, S; Napp, V; Oliver, A; Richman, S; Seymour, M; Slater, S; Wadsley, J; Wagstaff, J, 2013
)
0.9
" Correlations between pharmacokinetic data and incidence of neutropenia and diarrhea were also assessed."( Pharmacokinetic assessment of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38-glucuronide: a substudy of the FIRIS study.
Komatsu, Y; Muro, K; Sameshima, S; Satoh, T; Sugihara, K; Yamaguchi, K; Yasui, H, 2013
)
0.68
" ¹⁸FDG-PET may be a useful pharmacodynamic marker of SU5416 bioactivity but requires additional development."( A phase I dose escalation and pharmacodynamic study of SU5416 (semaxanib) combined with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Bekaii-Saab, T; Clinton, SK; Grever, MR; Kraut, EH; Martin, LK; Monk, P; Serna, D, 2013
)
0.6
" However, Oatp1a/1b-null mice had increased levels of carboxylesterase (Ces) enzymes, which caused higher conversion of irinotecan to SN-38 in plasma, potentially complicating pharmacokinetic analyses."( OATP1A/1B transporters affect irinotecan and SN-38 pharmacokinetics and carboxylesterase expression in knockout and humanized transgenic mice.
Elbatsh, A; Iusuf, D; Lin, F; Ludwig, M; Schinkel, AH; van de Steeg, E; van der Valk, M; van Esch, A; van Tellingen, O; Wagenaar, E, 2014
)
0.9
" However, there is a paucity of data from sufficiently powered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies to support dosage recommendations in such patients."( Optimization of cancer chemotherapy on the basis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: from patients enrolled in clinical trials to those in the 'real world'.
Fujita, K; Sasaki, Y, 2014
)
0.4
" In rats, MXN-004 exhibited a longer half-life (sixfold) and much greater Vss as compared with irinotecan."( In vitro cytotoxicity, pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution in rats of MXN-004, a novel conjugate of polyethylene glycol and SN38.
Chen, X; He, Y; Li, C; Li, N; Qiu, Z; Ren, S; Tian, F; Wang, X; Zhang, Y; Zhao, D; Zhou, S, 2014
)
0.62
"To facilitate new drug development, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling methods receive growing attention as a tool to fully understand and predict complex pharmacokinetic phenomena."( Estimation of feasible solution space using Cluster Newton Method: application to pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan with physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.
Konagaya, A; Kusuhara, H; Maeda, K; Yoshida, K, 2013
)
0.6
" Possible causes in the irinotecan pharmacokinetic alterations were suggested, but they were not conclusive."( Estimation of feasible solution space using Cluster Newton Method: application to pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan with physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.
Konagaya, A; Kusuhara, H; Maeda, K; Yoshida, K, 2013
)
0.91
" Pharmacokinetic results suggested that the overall systemic exposure to SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, was affected by pazopanib to a greater extent than was the systemic exposure to irinotecan itself."( A phase I open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab for relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bennouna, J; Botbyl, J; de Labareyre, C; Delord, JP; Deslandres, M; Ruiz-Soto, R; Senellart, H; Suttle, AB; Wixon, C, 2015
)
0.84
"Sixteen of 19 patients were evaluable, with serial pharmacokinetic studies in ten patients."( Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors.
Brennan, RC; Furman, W; Mao, S; McGregor, LM; Santana, V; Stewart, CF; Turner, DC; Wu, J, 2014
)
0.63
" Pharmacokinetic analysis confirms that co-administration of gefitinib increases irinotecan bioavailability leading to an increased SN-38 lactone systemic exposure."( Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors.
Brennan, RC; Furman, W; Mao, S; McGregor, LM; Santana, V; Stewart, CF; Turner, DC; Wu, J, 2014
)
0.86
" Therapeutic drug monitoring is a valid tool to determine the pharmacokinetic of a drug and individualized drug therapy, adjusting patient's dose requirement through the measurement and interpretation of drug concentrations."( [Clinical application, limits and perspectives of pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic analysis of anticancer drugs].
Chantry, AS; Ciccolini, J; Lacarelle, B; Quaranta, S,
)
0.13
" Here, we describe an on-chip small intestine-liver coupled model for pharmacokinetic studies."( An on-chip small intestine-liver model for pharmacokinetic studies.
Fujii, T; Ikeda, T; Kimura, H; Nakayama, H; Sakai, Y, 2015
)
0.42
" A wide inter-individual variability in irinotecan pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamics has been reported and associated to patients' genetic background."( Development and validation of a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of irinotecan and its main metabolites in human plasma and its application in a clinical pharmacokinetic study.
Marangon, E; Mazzega, E; Posocco, B; Toffoli, G, 2015
)
0.89
" Pharmacokinetic studies of the liposomal sum total CPT-11, released CPT-11, SN-38, SN-38G, 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin, and 7-ethyl-10-[4-amino-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin in plasma were performed."( Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PEGylated liposomal irinotecan (IHL-305) in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Bendell, JC; Burris, HA; Chan, E; Ikeda, S; Infante, JR; Jones, SF; Keedy, VL; Kirschbrown, WP; Kodaira, H; Lee, W; Rothenberg, ML; Wu, H; Zamboni, BA; Zamboni, WC, 2015
)
0.64
"The population pharmacokinetic model reported here was developed using data from 2 phase 2 trials of irinotecan for treatment of malignant glioma to quantify the impact of concomitant therapy with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) on irinotecan pharmacokinetics."( Quantification of the impact of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs on irinotecan pharmacokinetics and SN-38 exposure.
Ames, MM; Berg, AK; Buckner, JC; Galanis, E; Jaeckle, KA; Reid, JM, 2015
)
0.87
" Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using WinNonLin and NONMEM."( Phenotyping of UGT1A1 Activity Using Raltegravir Predicts Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Irinotecan in FOLFIRI.
Cheong, PF; Fan, L; Goh, BC; Hee, KH; Lee, LS; Lee, SC; Sapari, NS; Seng, KY; Soh, TI; Soo, R; Soong, R; Wang, LZ; Wong, A; Yong, WP, 2016
)
0.65
"The objective of this research is to develop and validate a sensitive and reproducible UPLC-MS/MS method to quantify irinotecan, its active metabolite SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (phase II metabolite of SN-38) simultaneously in different bio-matrices (plasma, urine, feces), tissues (liver and kidney) and to use the method to investigate its pharmacokinetic behavior in rats."( Development and validation of an UPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of irinotecan, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide in plasma, urine, feces, liver and kidney: Application to a pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in rats.
Basu, S; Gao, S; Hu, M; Yin, T; Zeng, M, 2016
)
0.87
"In a cohort of 109 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) in combination with other drugs, associations were assessed between 21 selected single nucleotide polymorphisms of NR1I2 or NR1I3 and pharmacokinetic parameters or toxicity of irinotecan and its metabolites."( Effect of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Xenobiotic-sensing Receptors NR1I2 and NR1I3 on the Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Irinotecan in Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Boyer, JC; Del Rio, M; Evrard, A; Gassiot, M; Mbatchi, LC; Robert, J; Thomas, F; Tubiana, N; Ychou, M, 2016
)
0.87
" This drug is a feasible candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring due to the presence of a wide inter-individual variability in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters."( Cross-validation of a mass spectrometric-based method for the therapeutic drug monitoring of irinotecan: implementation of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry in pharmacokinetic measurements.
Agostini, M; Calandra, E; Crotti, S; Giodini, L; Marangon, E; Nitti, D; Posocco, B; Toffoli, G; Traldi, P, 2016
)
0.65
"The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the potential of pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions between ramucirumab and irinotecan or its metabolite, SN-38, when administered with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI)."( Lack of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between ramucirumab and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Asakiewicz, C; Braiteh, F; Chaudhary, A; Denlinger, CS; Gao, L; Lee, JJ; Lin, Y; LoRusso, P; Nasroulah, F; Shepard, DR; Wang, D, 2016
)
0.87
"Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which are captured from blood with anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) antibodies, have established prognostic value in specific epithelial cancers, but less is known about their utility for assessing patient response to molecularly targeted agents via measurement of pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints."( Promise and limits of the CellSearch platform for evaluating pharmacodynamics in circulating tumor cells.
Balasubramanian, P; Chen, AP; Evrard, YA; Kinders, RJ; Kummar, S; Wang, L, 2016
)
0.43
" Here, the pharmacokinetic interactions in mice between irinotecan, its active metabolite SN-38 and MBL-II-141 were characterized quantitatively in the blood and in the brain."( Pharmacokinetic interactions in mice between irinotecan and MBL-II-141, an ABCG2 inhibitor.
Di Pietro, A; Guitton, J; Hénin, E; Honorat, M; Payen, L; Tod, M, 2017
)
0.96
"These results may help to anticipate the pharmacokinetic interactions between MBL-II-141 and other ABCG2 substrates."( Pharmacokinetic interactions in mice between irinotecan and MBL-II-141, an ABCG2 inhibitor.
Di Pietro, A; Guitton, J; Hénin, E; Honorat, M; Payen, L; Tod, M, 2017
)
0.71
"This method was successfully used to quantify CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G and applied to a pharmacokinetic study."( Determination of irinotecan, SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide using HPLC/MS/MS: Application in a clinical pharmacokinetic and personalized medicine in colorectal cancer patients.
Atasilp, C; Chansriwong, P; Prommas, S; Puangpetch, A; Rerkarmnuaychoke, B; Reungwetwattana, T; Sirachainan, E; Sirilerttrakul, S; Sukasem, C; Wongwaisayawan, S, 2018
)
0.82
"To establish a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for analyzing the factors associated with side effects of irinotecan by using a computer-based virtual clinical study (VCS) because many controversial associations between various genetic polymorphisms and side effects of irinotecan have been reported."( Virtual Clinical Studies to Examine the Probability Distribution of the AUC at Target Tissues Using Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling: Application to Analyses of the Effect of Genetic Polymorphism of Enzymes and Transporters on Irinotecan Ind
Hosokawa, M; Sugiyama, Y; Tomaru, A; Toshimoto, K, 2017
)
0.84
" IMMU-132 cleared with a half-life of approximately 11 to 14 hours, reflecting the release of SN-38 from the conjugate; IgG cleared more slowly (half-life, approximately 103-114 hours)."( Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), an anti-Trop-2-SN-38 antibody-drug conjugate for the treatment of diverse epithelial cancers: Safety and pharmacokinetics.
Bardia, A; Goldenberg, DM; Govindan, SV; Guarino, M; Isakoff, SJ; Maliakal, P; Mayer, IA; Messersmith, WA; Ocean, AJ; Picozzi, VJ; Sharkey, RM; Starodub, AN; Vahdat, LT; Wegener, WA, 2017
)
0.46
"Sacituzumab govitecan has a predictable pharmacokinetic profile and manageable toxicity at doses of 8 and 10 mg/kg."( Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), an anti-Trop-2-SN-38 antibody-drug conjugate for the treatment of diverse epithelial cancers: Safety and pharmacokinetics.
Bardia, A; Goldenberg, DM; Govindan, SV; Guarino, M; Isakoff, SJ; Maliakal, P; Mayer, IA; Messersmith, WA; Ocean, AJ; Picozzi, VJ; Sharkey, RM; Starodub, AN; Vahdat, LT; Wegener, WA, 2017
)
0.46
" Mainly metabolized by hepatic route, and excreted through biliary tract, this dug has been found to possess high variation in patients in its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile."( Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for predicting irinotecan exposure in human body.
Ahmad, T; Ahmed, M; Czejka, M; Fan, Y; Khan, RA; Mansoor, N; Sharib, S; Yang, DH, 2017
)
0.7
" Methods for understanding PK will help in conducting pharmacokinetic - pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) correlations and improving the quality and applicability of data obtained using zebrafish."( Correlation of pharmacokinetics and brain penetration data of adult zebrafish with higher mammals including humans.
Kulkarni, P; Medishetti, R; Nune, N; Oruganti, S; Rao, P; Saxena, U; Sripuram, V; Sriram, D; Yellanki, S; Yogeeswari, P,
)
0.13
" Irinotecan therapy is characterized by several dose-limiting toxicities and large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability."( Individualization of Irinotecan Treatment: A Review of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics.
Bins, S; de Man, FM; Goey, AKL; Mathijssen, RHJ; van Schaik, RHN, 2018
)
1.71
" The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model of EP and four of its metabolites (irinotecan, SN38, SN38-glucuronide, and APC) and determine covariates affecting their pharmacokinetics."( Integrated population pharmacokinetics of etirinotecan pegol and its four metabolites in cancer patients with solid tumors.
Chia, YL; Eldon, MA; Gordi, T; Hoch, U; Sy, SKB, 2018
)
0.95
" Pharmacokinetic models to describe IRI and SN-38 kinetic profiles are available, with few studies exploring pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic-based dose individualization."( Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Markers of Irinotecan Toxicity.
Antunes, MV; Hahn, RZ; Linden, R; Perassolo, MS; Schwartsmann, G; Suyenaga, ES; Verza, SG, 2019
)
0.77
" The use of dried blood spot sampling could allow the clinical application of limited sampling and population pharmacokinetic models for IRI doses individualization."( Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Markers of Irinotecan Toxicity.
Antunes, MV; Hahn, RZ; Linden, R; Perassolo, MS; Schwartsmann, G; Suyenaga, ES; Verza, SG, 2019
)
0.77
"We used multiplexed targeted-mass-spectrometry to select pRAD50(Ser635) as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for AZD0156-mediated ATM inhibition from a panel of 45 peptides, then developed and tested a clinically applicable immunohistochemistry assay for pRAD50(Ser635) detection in FFPE tissue."( pRAD50: a novel and clinically applicable pharmacodynamic biomarker of both ATM and ATR inhibition identified using mass spectrometry and immunohistochemistry.
Barrett, JC; Cadogan, EB; Garcia-Trinidad, A; Griffin, N; Harrington, EA; Howat, WJ; Hughes, GD; Ivey, RG; Jones, GN; Lau, A; Odedra, R; Paulovich, AG; Pierce, AJ; Ramos-Montoya, A; Rooney, C; Roudier, M; Whiteaker, JR; Wilson, Z; Young, LA; Zhao, L, 2018
)
0.48
" Study description, pharmacokinetic parameter values and influential covariates are reported."( Population pharmacokinetics of FOLFIRINOX: a review of studies and parameters.
Barbolosi, D; Deyme, L; Gattacceca, F, 2019
)
0.51
" The individualized dosing of CPT-11 is essential to ensure optimal pharmacotherapy in cancer patients, given the wide interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of this drug and its active metabolite SN-38."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its metabolites in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aldaz, A; Insausti, A; Oyaga-Iriarte, E; Sayar, O, 2019
)
0.79
" The concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of the parent compound and its metabolite administered at clinically applicable dose via the intravenous route in the tumor tissue are predicted using this approach."( Enzyme and Transporter Kinetics for CPT-11 (Irinotecan) and SN-38: An Insight on Tumor Tissue Compartment Pharmacokinetics Using PBPK.
Ahmad, T; Ahmed, M; Chen, ZS; Czejka, M; Fan, Y; Khan, RA; Mansoor, N; Sharib, S; Wu, ZX; Yang, DH, 2019
)
0.78
" Supported by several demographic data, blood markers and pharmacokinetic parameters resulting from a non-compartmental pharmacokinetic study of CPT-11 and its metabolites (SN-38 and SN-38-G), we use machine learning techniques to predict high degrees of different toxicities (leukopenia, neutropenia and diarrhea) in new patients."( Prediction of irinotecan toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients based on machine learning models with pharmacokinetic parameters.
Aldaz, A; Insausti, A; Oyaga-Iriarte, E; Sayar, O, 2019
)
0.87
" In the current study, we aimed to investigate whether the synergistic effect is related to a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between sunitinib and irinotecan."( The pharmacokinetic interaction between irinotecan and sunitinib.
Jiang, L; Liu, Y; Luan, X; Wang, L; Wang, S; Wang, X; Wang, Z; Xia, Y; Zhang, Z, 2020
)
1.02
"To evaluate pharmacokinetic and safety profile of LifePearl microspheres loaded with irinotecan (LifePearl-IRI) in the treatment of liver-dominant, metastatic colorectal carcinoma (LM-CRC) by transarterial chemoembolization."( LifePearl microspheres loaded with irinotecan in the treatment of Liver-dominant metastatic colorectal carcinoma: feasibility, safety and pharmacokinetic study.
Helmberger, T; Isailovic, TV; Maleux, G; Pereira, P; Prenen, H; Spriet, I, 2020
)
1.06
" Using pharmacokinetic analysis, it is possible to directly evaluate enzyme activity and consider what kind of enzyme variation causes the increase in the AUC of SN-38."( Effect of UGT1A1, CYP3A and CES Activities on the Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan and its Metabolites in Patients with UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphisms.
Ayukawa, H; Endo, S; Furuse, J; Furuta, T; Hirano, R; Kaneko, S; Kawai, K; Kobayashi, T; Minowa, Y; Nagashima, F; Naruge, D; Okano, N; Shibasaki, H; Yokokawa, A, 2021
)
0.86
"The aim of the present study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its four main metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G, APC and NPC) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI and FOLFIRINOX regimens and to quantify and explain the inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability in this context."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its four main metabolites in patients treated with FOLFIRI or FOLFIRINOX regimen.
Barbolosi, D; Deyme, L; Evrard, A; Gattacceca, F; Mbatchi, LC; Tubiana-Mathieu, N; Ychou, M, 2021
)
1.13
" First, fixed and random effects models were selected using statistical and graphical methods; second, the impact of covariates on pharmacokinetic parameters was evaluated to explain the inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its four main metabolites in patients treated with FOLFIRI or FOLFIRINOX regimen.
Barbolosi, D; Deyme, L; Evrard, A; Gattacceca, F; Mbatchi, LC; Tubiana-Mathieu, N; Ychou, M, 2021
)
0.9
" Moreover, a direct conversion of NPC into SN-38 had never been described before in a population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its four main metabolites in patients treated with FOLFIRI or FOLFIRINOX regimen.
Barbolosi, D; Deyme, L; Evrard, A; Gattacceca, F; Mbatchi, LC; Tubiana-Mathieu, N; Ychou, M, 2021
)
1.1
" Over the last 10 years, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of panitumumab has been studied to further evaluate its safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing regimen."( Panitumumab: A Review of Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacology Properties After Over a Decade of Experience in Patients with Solid Tumors.
Dutta, S; Kast, J; Upreti, VV, 2021
)
0.62
" Here, we introduce a novel tumour-on-chip microfluidic system that mimics the pharmacokinetic profile of compounds on 3D tumour spheroids to evaluate their response to the treatments."( Tumour-on-chip microfluidic platform for assessment of drug pharmacokinetics and treatment response.
Ashford, M; Cadogan, E; Critchlow, S; Hughes, G; Lau, A; O'Connor, MJ; Oplustil O'Connor, L; Petreus, T; Pilla Reddy, V; Smith, A, 2021
)
0.62
"Body surface area (BSA)-based dosing of irinotecan (IR) does not account for its pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variabilities."( Evaluation of pharmacogenomics and hepatic nuclear imaging-related covariates by population pharmacokinetic models of irinotecan and its metabolites.
Beale, PJ; Burge, ME; Campbell, I; Crowley, S; Cullinane, C; Hatzimihalis, A; Hicks, RJ; Jefford, M; Karapetis, CS; Liauw, W; Link, E; Liu, Z; Martin, JH; Matera, A; McLachlan, SA; Michael, M; Price, T; Thompson, M, 2022
)
1.2
" A stepwise analytical framework including a population pharmacokinetic model with SNP- and gene-based testing was used to identify demographic/clinical/genetic factors that influence the clearance of irinotecan and SN-38."( Integration of DNA sequencing with population pharmacokinetics to improve the prediction of irinotecan exposure in cancer patients.
Bies, RR; Cecchin, E; Cox, NJ; Etheridge, AS; Forrest, A; Innocenti, F; Karas, S; Mathijssen, RHJ; Mohlke, KL; Nickerson, DA; Toffoli, G, 2022
)
1.13
" A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed based on data from seven studies (N = 440)."( Population pharmacokinetics of liposomal irinotecan in patients with cancer and exposure-safety analyses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Bekaii-Saab, T; Boland, PM; Brendel, K; Dayyani, F; Dean, A; Macarulla, T; Maxwell, F; Mody, K; Pedret-Dunn, A; Wainberg, ZA; Zhang, B, 2021
)
0.89
" In current study, we established a new physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the disposition kinetics of irinotecan."( Development of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict irinotecan disposition during inflammation.
Chityala, PK; Ghose, R; Li, L; Lin, Z; Tao, G, 2022
)
1.16
" However, systematic evaluation of potential pharmacodynamic interactions among multi-drug therapy has not been reported previously."( FOLFIRINOX Pharmacodynamic Interactions in 2D and 3D Pancreatic Cancer Cell Cultures.
Allen-Coyle, TJ; Clynes, M; Conlon, NT; Garner, W; Mager, DE; Niu, J; O'Sullivan, F; Roche, S; Straubinger, RM; Welsch, E, 2022
)
0.72
"There have been many attempts in pharmaceutical industries and academia to improve the pharmacokinetic characteristics of anti-tumor small-molecule drugs by conjugating them with large molecules, such as monoclonal antibodies, called ADCs."( Evaluation of In Vivo Prepared Albumin-Drug Conjugate Using Immunoprecipitation Linked LC-MS Assay and Its Application to Mouse Pharmacokinetic Study.
Hwang, S; Jo, E; Lee, J; Lee, Y; Lim, JH; Park, M; Park, SJ; Park, Y; Shin, YG, 2023
)
0.91

Compound-Compound Interactions

The aims of this study were to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin in combination with fixed doses of gemcitabine, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (G-FLIE) in solid tumors, including advanced pancreatic cancer. Pharmacokinetic data suggested a decreased metabolism of irinOTecan into SN-38 and SN- 38-glucuronide when it was administered with thalidomide.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)."( CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Fukuoka, M; Kishimoto, S; Kudoh, S; Kusunoki, Y; Masuda, N; Matsui, K; Nakagawa, K; Negoro, S; Takada, M; Takifuji, N, 1992
)
0.28
" The initial dose of CPT-11 was 30 mg/m2 given as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin (80 mg/m2 IV on day 1) given every 4 weeks."( CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Fukuoka, M; Kishimoto, S; Kudoh, S; Kusunoki, Y; Masuda, N; Matsui, K; Nakagawa, K; Negoro, S; Takada, M; Takifuji, N, 1992
)
0.28
" In an attempt to establish whether the combination of CPT-11 with other standard anti-cancer agents would be of any benefit, we studied the effects of CPT-11 in combination with 11 other anti-cancer agents on a human T-cell leukemia cell line, MOLT-3, in culture."( Effects of CPT-11 in combination with other anti-cancer agents in culture.
Akutsu, M; Inoue, Y; Kano, Y; Miura, Y; Sakamoto, S; Suda, K; Suzuki, K; Yoshida, M, 1992
)
0.28
"To investigate the effects of CPT-11 in combination with other anticancer agents, a human Burkitt's lymphoma cell line, Dauji, was incubated for 3 days in the presence of SN-38 (active substance of CPT-11) and the combined drug and cell growth inhibition was determined by MTT assay."( [Effects of SN-38 in combination with other anticancer agents against Dauji cells].
Akutsu, M; Kano, Y; Miura, Y; Suzuki, K; Tsunoda, S, 1994
)
0.29
" The first phase I trial of CPT-11 combined with cisplatin achieved an encouraging response rate of 54% in 27 patients with previously untreated NSCLC, and the recommended schedule for phase II studies was 60 mg/m2 of CPT-11 (days 1, 8, and 15) plus 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin (day 1) given at 4-week intervals."( Clinical studies of irinotecan alone and in combination with cisplatin.
Fukuoka, M; Masuda, N, 1994
)
0.61
" Two combination phase I trials were undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin and vindesine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer."( Phase I clinical trial of irinotecan (CPT-11), 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxy-camptothecin, and cisplatin in combination with fixed dose of vindesine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Arioka, H; Eguchi, K; Karato, A; Kunikane, H; Nishio, M; Ohe, Y; Oshita, F; Sasaki, Y; Shinkai, T; Tamura, T, 1994
)
0.59
"A dose-escalation study of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) combined with fixed-dose cisplatin was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and objective response rate in patients with advanced gastric cancer."( Phase I-II study of irinotecan hydrochloride combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Boku, N; Fujii, T; Fukuda, H; Kondo, H; Muro, K; Oda, Y; Ohtsu, A; Oka, M; Ono, H; Saito, D; Shimada, Y; Shirao, K; Watanabe, Y; Yamao, T; Yokoyama, T; Yoshida, S, 1997
)
0.92
"To determine the optimal combination of commonly used anticancer agents with 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38), an active metabolite of 7-ethyl-10-[4(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxy camptothecin (CPT-11), for chemotherapy of lung cancer, we studied the effects of SN-38 in combination with six representative anticancer agents on the human small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell line, NCl N417, and the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line, PC-9."( Effect of CPT-11 in combination with other anticancer agents in lung cancer cells.
Bai, F; Hara, N; Kawasaki, M; Mizuno, K; Nakanishi, Y; Pei, XH; Takayama, K; Tsuruta, N, 1997
)
0.3
" We conducted a phase II study of CPT-11 combined with cisplatin to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of this regimen in patients with previously untreated SCLC."( Phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer. West Japan Lung Cancer Group.
Ariyoshi, Y; Fujiwara, Y; Fukuoka, M; Furuse, K; Kinoshita, A; Kudoh, S; Takada, Y; Yamamoto, H, 1998
)
0.63
" CPT-11 60 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days."( Phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer. West Japan Lung Cancer Group.
Ariyoshi, Y; Fujiwara, Y; Fukuoka, M; Furuse, K; Kinoshita, A; Kudoh, S; Takada, Y; Yamamoto, H, 1998
)
0.63
"CPT-11 (60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15) in combination with CDDP (80 mg/m2 on day 1) has shown promising antitumor activity for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are leukopenia and diarrhea, with a wide variation among patients."( Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with weekly administration of cisplatin (CDDP) for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Hibino, S; Hino, M; Kabe, J; Kamimura, M; Kobayashi, K; Kudo, K; Kudoh, S; Shibuya, M; Shinbara, A; Takeda, Y, 1998
)
1.74
"The value of weekly administration of CDDP in combination with CPT-11 was shown by (1) diarrhea not being dose-limiting, (2) mild nausea, (3) well-maintained AUC of free platinum, and (4) promising activity."( Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with weekly administration of cisplatin (CDDP) for non-small-cell lung cancer.
Hibino, S; Hino, M; Kabe, J; Kamimura, M; Kobayashi, K; Kudo, K; Kudoh, S; Shibuya, M; Shinbara, A; Takeda, Y, 1998
)
1.74
"The efficacy and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) were assessed in 24 previously untreated patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer."( [Clinical evaluation of irinotecan combined with cisplatin by divided administration in patients with untreated primary non-small cell lung cancer].
Asano, T; Kawaji, K; Kobayashi, M; Mukai, J; Namikawa, O; Sano, T; Yamamoto, A, 1998
)
0.9
" In this study, the potential application of MGI-114 in the treatment of colon cancer was further explored by evaluating the activity of MGI-114 in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU)."( Enhanced antitumor activity of 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in the HT29 human colon tumor xenograft model.
Britten, CD; Eckhardt, SG; Hilsenbeck, SG; MacDonald, JR; Mangold, G; Marty, J; Rowinsky, EK; Von Hoff, DD; Weitman, S, 1999
)
0.73
"To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV), using a biweekly LV5FU2 regimen and increasing doses of CPT-11, and to assess the efficacy of this combination in pretreated patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)."( Irinotecan combined with bolus fluorouracil, continuous infusion fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen): a clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Armand, JP; Bexon, A; Bonnay, M; Ducreux, M; Mahjoubi, M; Méry-Mignard, D; Rougier, P; Seitz, JF; Ychou, M, 1999
)
1.98
" CPT-11 at 180 to 200 mg/m(2) in combination with LV5FU2 has been selected as the recommended dose for further studies."( Irinotecan combined with bolus fluorouracil, continuous infusion fluorouracil, and high-dose leucovorin every two weeks (LV5FU2 regimen): a clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Armand, JP; Bexon, A; Bonnay, M; Ducreux, M; Mahjoubi, M; Méry-Mignard, D; Rougier, P; Seitz, JF; Ychou, M, 1999
)
1.75
"For phase II studies, we recommend irinotecan 260 mg/m(2) combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks for chemotherapy-naive patients in good physical condition, and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) for other patients."( Phase I study of 3-week schedule of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.
de Boer-Dennert, MM; de Jonge, MJ; Jacques, C; Planting, AS; Sparreboom, A; ter Steeg, J; van der Burg, ME; Verweij, J, 2000
)
0.86
" We conducted a Phase I study of CPT-11 combined with carboplatin in previously untreated solid cancers, especially advanced lung cancer."( Phase I study of irinotecan combined with carboplatin in previously untreated solid cancers.
Fukuda, M; Kawabata, S; Kinoshita, A; Kohno, S; Nakatomi, K; Noguchi, Y; Oka, M; Soda, H; Takatani, H; Terashi, K; Tsukamoto, K; Tsurutani, J, 1999
)
0.64
" In order to promote the clinical response of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer using CPT-11, one of the most effective strategies is to use it in combination with other anticancer agents."( In vitro augmentation of antitumor effect in combination with CPT-11 and CDDP for human colorectal cancer.
Hotta, T; Ishimoto, K; Iwahashi, M; Matsuda, K; Tanaka, H; Tani, M; Tanimura, H; Tsunoda, T; Yamaue, H, 2000
)
0.31
" The augmentation of the antitumor effectiveness of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-CPT (SN-38) was analyzed in combination with other anticancer agents."( In vitro augmentation of antitumor effect in combination with CPT-11 and CDDP for human colorectal cancer.
Hotta, T; Ishimoto, K; Iwahashi, M; Matsuda, K; Tanaka, H; Tani, M; Tanimura, H; Tsunoda, T; Yamaue, H, 2000
)
0.31
"The percent inhibition of SN-38 in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) and mitomycin revealed a high anticancer effect compared with each anticancer agent alone for freshly isolated rectal cancer."( In vitro augmentation of antitumor effect in combination with CPT-11 and CDDP for human colorectal cancer.
Hotta, T; Ishimoto, K; Iwahashi, M; Matsuda, K; Tanaka, H; Tani, M; Tanimura, H; Tsunoda, T; Yamaue, H, 2000
)
0.31
"Based upon the results of phase I study of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a combination phase II study on NSCLC was carried out from Feb."( [A phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. CPT-11 Lung Cancer Study Group].
Fujita, A; Fukuoka, M; Katakami, N; Kurita, Y; Nagao, K; Nakano, M; Negoro, S; Niitani, H; Saito, R, 2000
)
0.89
"Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil and calcium folinate was well-tolerated and increased response rate, time to progression, and survival, with a later deterioration in quality of life."( Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial.
Alakl, M; Awad, L; Carmichael, J; Cunningham, D; Douillard, JY; Gruia, G; Iveson, T; James, RD; Jandik, P; Karasek, P; Navarro, M; Roth, AD; Rougier, P, 2000
)
3.19
"Based on preclinical data demonstrating synergy between camptothecin analogues and taxanes, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan that could be given in combination with a fixed dose of paclitaxel of 75 mg/m2, when both drugs were delivered on a weekly schedule."( Dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced cancer.
Burtness, BA; Cheng, Y; DiStasio, SA; Leffert, JJ; Li, X; McKeon, A; Murren, JR; Peccerillo, K; Pizzorno, G, 2000
)
0.77
"The activity of temozolomide combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) was evaluated against eight independent xenografts (four neuroblastomas, three rhabdomyosarcomas, and one glioblastoma)."( Antitumor activity of temozolomide combined with irinotecan is partly independent of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and mismatch repair phenotypes in xenograft models.
Brent, TP; Cheshire, PJ; Friedman, HS; Houghton, PJ; Kirstein, MN; Poquette, CA; Richmond, LB; Stewart, CF; Tan, M, 2000
)
0.82
"To determine the dose-limiting toxicity of CPT-11 in combination with oxaliplatin, and the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of CPT-11 using an every two weeks schedule."( Dose escalation of CPT-11 in combination with oxaliplatin using an every two weeks schedule: a phase I study in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients.
Cvitkovic, E; Di Palma, M; Goldwasser, F; Gross-Goupil, M; Marceau-Suissa, J; Misset, JL; Tigaud, JM; Wasserman, E; Yovine, A, 2000
)
0.31
" The prevention of CPT-11-induced side effects by oral alkalization (OA) combined with control of defecation (CD) was estimated in a case-control study of lung cancer patients."( Prevention of irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced diarrhea by oral alkalization combined with control of defecation in cancer patients.
Akiyama, Y; Handa, S; Kobayashi, K; Kudo, K; Kudoh, S; Soma, T; Takeda, Y, 2001
)
0.67
" Four cohorts of patients were recruited with MMC given at 8 mg/m2 for the first 3 levels together with irinotecan at 300 mg/m2, 325 mg/m2, and 350 mg/m2; the fourth dose level was given with MMC at 10 mg/m2 and irinotecan at 325 mg/m2."( Phase I-II study of irinotecan in combination with mitomycin C in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer.
Adam, R; Antoine, EC; Bassot, V; Benhammonda, A; Bismuth, H; Castaing, D; Gil-Delgado, MA; Grapin, JP; Guinet, F; Khayat, D, 2001
)
0.85
" Preclinical and phase I trials have shown the additive or synergistic activity of temozolomide combined with carmustine against solid tumors, including malignant glioma, and the sequence-dependent effects of the combination."( Temozolomide in combination with other cytotoxic agents.
Prados, M, 2001
)
0.31
"From December 1994 to July 1997, we conducted a dose escalation study of irinotecan combined with carboplatin in 17 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities."( Dose escalation study of irinotecan combined with carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Fukuoka, M; Negoro, S; Nitta, T; Takeda, K; Takifuji, N; Terakawa, K; Yoshimura, N, 2001
)
0.85
") UFT (250 mg/m(2)/day) for 21 days of a 28-day cycle combined with increasing intravenous (i."( Phase I trial of weekly irinotecan combined with UFT as second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.
Alonso, V; Antón, A; Escudero, P; Herrero, A; Isla, MD; Martinez-Trufero, J; Mayordomo, JI; Sáenz, A; Tres, A; Zorrilla, M, 2001
)
0.62
"Fifteen patients with isolated liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma were treated with regional administration of CPT-11 in combination with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA)."( Regional administration of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases--a pilot experience.
Dvorák, J; Jandík, P; Malírová, E; Megancová, J; Melichar, B; Tousková, M; Voboril, Z,
)
0.43
" A phase II study was conducted to assess the tolerance and efficacy of CPT-11 in combination with leucovorin-modulated bolus plus infusional 5-FU given according to the de Gramont regimen in chemonaive patients with ACC."( Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II study.
Androulakis, N; Georgoulias, V; Kakolyris, S; Kalbakis, K; Kandilis, K; Kouroussis, C; Mavroudis, D; Sarra, E; Souglakos, J; Vamvakas, L; Ziras, N, 2002
)
1.76
" In this report, we have studied the in vivo activity of IMC-C225 combined with the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11) using two models of human colorectal carcinoma in nude mice."( Enhanced antitumor activity of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody IMC-C225 in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) against human colorectal tumor xenografts.
Bassi, R; Ellis, LM; Hicklin, DJ; Hooper, AT; Prewett, MC; Waksal, HW, 2002
)
0.74
"To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) plus fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC)."( Triplet combination with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II trial.
Agelaki, S; Androulakis, N; Athanasiadis, N; Georgoulias, V; Kakolyris, S; Kalbakis, K; Kourousis, Ch; Mavroudis, D; Samonis, G; Souglakos, J; Tsetis, D; Vardakis, N, 2002
)
0.88
" Thus, clinical and economic data demonstrate that irinotecan, either in combination with irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the first line setting or as monotherapy in the second line setting, has a major role in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer."( Clinical and economic benefits of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Cunningham, D; Falk, S; Jackson, D, 2002
)
0.85
" Therefore, we evaluated the anti-proliferative potential of MTA combined with drugs known to exert therapeutic activity against colon cancer, including 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and SN38, the active metabolite of irinotecan."( Pemetrexed disodium combined with oxaliplatin, SN38, or 5-fluorouracil, based on the quantitation of drug interactions in human HT29 colon cancer cells.
Coudray, AM; De Gramont, A; Faivre, S; Gespach, C; Louvet, C; Raymond, E; Tournigand, C, 2002
)
0.5
" The purpose of this report was to examine whether oral alkalization (OA) combined with control of defecation (CD) might prevent irinotecan-induced side effects."( [A case-control study of prevention of irinotecan-induced diarrhea: the reducing side effects of irinotecan by oral alkalization combined with control of defecation].
Akiyama, Y; Handa, S; Kobayashi, K; Kudo, K; Kudoh, S; Soma, T; Takeda, Y, 2002
)
0.79
" We have conducted a phase I trial combining these agents to find the optimal dose of irinotecan in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin."( Phase I study of weekly irinotecan combined with weekly cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Hara, N; Harada, T; Inoue, K; Izumi, M; Kimotsuki, K; Minami, T; Nakanishi, Y; Osaki, S; Takano, K; Takayama, K; Wataya, H, 2002
)
0.84
"To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of raltitrexed when given with irinotecan and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of these two agents when given in combination."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with raltitrexed.
Adams, AL; Brady, D; Engstrom, PF; Gallo, JM; Kilpatrick, D; Lewis, NL; Litwin, S; Meropol, NJ; Scher, R; Szarka, CE; Weiner, LM, 2002
)
0.82
" There have been many phase I and II clinical trials demonstrating promising results of single-agent irinotecan and combination with concurrent therapy."( Irinotecan in combination with radiation therapy for small-cell and non-small-cell lung cancer.
Choy, H; Wu, HG, 2002
)
1.97
" We examined the response of three human colon tumors to TRAIL alone and in combination with chemotherapy, using SCID mice engrafted with intact patient surgical specimens."( Effects of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents on patients' colon tumors grown in SCID mice.
Hylander, BL; Naka, T; Repasky, EA; Rustum, YM; Sugamura, K; Widmer, MB, 2002
)
0.31
"The anti-metastatic efficacy of MMI-166, which is a selective matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor, in combination with CPT-11 was examined using two metastasis models of human gastrointestinal cancer cells."( Augmented anti-metastatic efficacy of a selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, MMI-166, in combination with CPT-11.
Hojo, K; Maekawa, R; Maki, H; Sawada, TY; Tanaka, H; Yoshioka, T, 2002
)
0.31
"This multicentre phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with the Nordic schedule of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan combined with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Nordic schedule as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Frödin, JE; Glimelius, B; Kjaer, M; Linné, T; Oulid-Aïssa, D; Pfeiffer, P; Pyrhönen, S; Ristamäki, R; Skovsgaard, T; Tveit, KM, 2002
)
1.99
"Irinotecan combined with the bolus Nordic schedule of 5-FU/FA is active in advanced colorectal cancer with an easily managed safety profile which ensures good schedule compliance."( Irinotecan combined with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Nordic schedule as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Frödin, JE; Glimelius, B; Kjaer, M; Linné, T; Oulid-Aïssa, D; Pfeiffer, P; Pyrhönen, S; Ristamäki, R; Skovsgaard, T; Tveit, KM, 2002
)
3.2
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) has shown promising antitumor activity for advanced gastric cancer, but the optimal administration schedule of CPT-11 is still controversial."( Pharmacokinetic study of two infusion schedules of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Fujitani, K; Hirao, M; Tsujinaka, T, 2003
)
2.01
"Protracted infusional CPT-11 combined with CDDP is a practical regimen, and may be appropriate for a future phase II trial."( Pharmacokinetic study of two infusion schedules of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Fujitani, K; Hirao, M; Tsujinaka, T, 2003
)
0.57
" The MTD for irinotecan administered in combination with cisplatin (30 mg/m(2)) was 50 mg/m(2)."( Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of weekly cisplatin and irinotecan combined with amifostine for refractory solid tumors.
Bernstein, ML; Blaney, SM; Dubowy, RL; Hershon, L; McLeod, WD; Souid, AK; Sullivan, J, 2003
)
0.93
"Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in combination with cisplatin has emerged as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer."( Activity and safety of a low dose, fractional administration of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in combination with cisplatin for relapsed gastric cancer patients: a preliminary report.
Aoki, F; Kaminishi, M; Mafune, K; Shimizu, N; Shimoyama, S; Tatsutomi, Y, 2003
)
2
" The metronomic CPT-11 was combined with long-duration, low-temperature, fever-range whole body hyperthermia (FR-WBH)."( The effect of whole-body hyperthermia combined with 'metronomic' chemotherapy on rat mammary adenocarcinoma metastases.
Bull, JM; Rowe, RW; Strebel, FR; Sumiyoshi, K,
)
0.13
" One cohort of five patients received ONYX-015 once a week for 6 weeks at a dose of 2 x 10(12) particles per infusion in combination with weekly infusions of irinotecan (CPT11, 125 mg per week) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU, 500 mg per week)."( Pilot trial of intravenous infusion of a replication-selective adenovirus (ONYX-015) in combination with chemotherapy or IL-2 treatment in refractory cancer patients.
Blackburn, A; Cunningham, C; Freeman, S; Gibson, B; Nemunaitis, J; Netto, G; Paulson, AS; Post, L; Randlev, B; Rich, D; Sands, B; Tong, A, 2003
)
0.52
" The use of irinotecan together with raltitrexed is also being investigated, as is its combination with oxaliplatin."( Irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer: dose intensification and combination with new agents, including biological response modifiers.
Ducreux, M; Köhne, CH; Schwartz, GK; Vanhoefer, U, 2003
)
2.14
"Three different therapeutic regimens of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) were evaluated for efficacy and safety in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer."( A randomized phase II trial of irinotecan in combination with infusional or two different bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid regimens as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Bouzid, K; Khalfallah, S; Padrik, P; Piko, B; Plate, S; Pshevloutsky, EM; Purkalne, G; Serafy, M; Tujakowski, J, 2003
)
0.87
" irinotecan/5-FU/LV administered every 2 weeks, combined with HAI pirarubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks."( Multimodal therapy with intravenous biweekly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan combined with hepatic arterial infusion pirarubicin in non-resectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (a European Association for Research in Oncology trial).
Auroux, J; Aziza, T; Braud, AC; Bugat, R; Buyse, M; Cherqui, D; Dupuis, O; Fagniez, PL; Ganem, G; Guimbaud, R; Haddad, E; Kobeiter, H; Piedbois, P; Piolot, A; Tayar, C; Valleur, P; Zelek, L, 2003
)
1.46
" We designed a biweekly administration regimen of TXT combined with CPT-11 for 4 weeks as one cycle in patients with inoperable or recurrent gastric cancer, and conducted a dose-escalation study."( Biweekly administration regimen of docetaxel combined with CPT-11 in patients with inoperable or recurrent gastric cancer.
Gamoh, M; Kanamaru, R; Mitachi, Y; Saitoh, S; Sakata, Y; Sekikawa, K; Terashima, M; Yoshioka, T, 2003
)
0.32
"Although the precise molecular mechanism of interaction between brostallicin and the other tested cytotoxics has not yet been identified, a clear therapeutic gain is observed in preclinical models when brostallicin is combined with anticancer agents such as cDDP, DX, CPT-11, and Taxotere."( Enhancement of in vivo antitumor activity of classical anticancer agents by combination with the new, glutathione-interacting DNA minor groove-binder, brostallicin.
Broggini, M; Colombo, T; Geroni, C; Marchini, S; Sabatino, MA, 2003
)
0.32
"The aim of the current randomized Phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine combined with irinotecan as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC)."( Randomized multicenter Phase II trial of two different schedules of irinotecan combined with capecitabine as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Artale, S; Bajetta, E; Beretta, E; Biasco, G; Bonaglia, L; Bonetti, A; Buzzoni, R; Carreca, I; Cassata, A; Cortinovis, D; Di Bartolomeo, M; Ferrario, E; Frustaci, S; Iannelli, A; Lambiase, A; Mariani, L; Marini, G; Pinotti, G, 2004
)
0.77
"The aims of this study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan given with oral R115777 (tipifarnib), a farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with R115777, a farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor.
de Bruijn, P; de Heus, G; de Jonge, MJ; Eskens, FA; Kehrer, DF; Klaren, A; Mathijssen, RH; Palmer, PA; Planting, AS; Sparreboom, A; Verhaeghe, T; Verheij, C; Verweij, J; Xie, R; Zhang, S, 2004
)
0.81
" The different drug combination schedules were tested in various concentrations by using equiactive concentrations of the two drugs."( The schedule-dependent enhanced cytotoxic activity of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38) in combination with Gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839).
Azzariti, A; Paradiso, A; Porcelli, L; Xu, JM, 2004
)
0.32
" We have examined the effect of this CDO alone and in combination with a range of common chemotherapeutic agents in colorectal cancer cell lines."( The in vitro effects of CRE-decoy oligonucleotides in combination with conventional chemotherapy in colorectal cancer cell lines.
Liu, WM; Propper, DJ; Scott, KA; Shahin, S, 2004
)
0.32
"A 46-year-old Japanese female with advanced gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology and who was refractory to methotrexate plus 5-FU sequential chemotherapy received low-dose, fractional irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in combination with cisplatin."( [Successful downstaging by a low-dose, fractional administration of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) in combination with cisplatin in peritoneal lavage cytology positive, 5-fluorouracil refractory advanced gastric cancer patients].
Hiki, N; Imamura, K; Kaminishi, M; Katayama, A; Mafune, K; Motoi, T; Oohashi, K; Shimizu, N; Shimoyama, S; Yamaguchi, H, 2004
)
0.75
"This multicentre phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan when combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid according to the Mayo Clinic schedule and to evaluate the activity of this combination as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of first-line irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Mayo Clinic schedule in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Carmichael, J; Daniel, F; Davidson, N; Falk, S; Jacobs, C; Kuehr, T; Rapoport, BL; Ruff, P; Thaler, J, 2004
)
0.83
"Diarrhoea was dose limiting at 300 mg/m2 irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid, and this was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose."( Phase I/II study of first-line irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Mayo Clinic schedule in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Carmichael, J; Daniel, F; Davidson, N; Falk, S; Jacobs, C; Kuehr, T; Rapoport, BL; Ruff, P; Thaler, J, 2004
)
0.88
"This regimen of irinotecan in combination with the Mayo Clinic schedule of bolus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid every four weeks showed activity as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of first-line irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Mayo Clinic schedule in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Boussard, B; Carmichael, J; Daniel, F; Davidson, N; Falk, S; Jacobs, C; Kuehr, T; Rapoport, BL; Ruff, P; Thaler, J, 2004
)
0.96
"We evaluated the cytotoxic effect of ZD0473 administered alone or in combination with 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) or SN38 in a panel of sensitive and 5FU-resistant colorectal cell lines (HT29/HT29-5FUR and LoVo/LoVo-5FUR)."( Antiproliferative effects of ZD0473 (AMD473) in combination with 5-fluorouracil or SN38 in human colorectal cancer cell lines.
Abad, A; Martinez-Balibrea, E; Plasencia, C; Taron, M, 2004
)
0.32
"CPT-11 combined with MMC can be effective against advanced or recurrent SCC of the uterine cervix."( Phase II study of irinotecan combined with mitomycin-C for advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: the JGOG study.
Fujii, T; Fushiki, H; Hasegawa, K; Izumi, R; Nishida, M; Nishimura, R; Takizawa, K; Tanaka, T; Umesaki, N; Yamamoto, K, 2004
)
0.66
" The cytotoxic activity of irofulven is augmented when combined with agents that interact with DNA topoisomerase I; however, none of the reported studies have used the protracted dosing schedule found to be active clinically in treatment of childhood cancers."( Enhanced antitumor activity of irofulven in combination with irinotecan in pediatric solid tumor xenograft models.
Billups, C; Bjornsti, MA; Houghton, PJ; Liang, H; Peterson, JK; Woo, MH, 2005
)
0.57
" At the same doses, irofulven in combination with irinotecan demonstrated superior antitumor activity, inducing complete responses in seven of the eight xenograft lines."( Enhanced antitumor activity of irofulven in combination with irinotecan in pediatric solid tumor xenograft models.
Billups, C; Bjornsti, MA; Houghton, PJ; Liang, H; Peterson, JK; Woo, MH, 2005
)
0.82
"These studies show that the cytotoxic activity of irofulven is greater when combined with protracted administration of irinotecan."( Enhanced antitumor activity of irofulven in combination with irinotecan in pediatric solid tumor xenograft models.
Billups, C; Bjornsti, MA; Houghton, PJ; Liang, H; Peterson, JK; Woo, MH, 2005
)
0.78
" Subsequently, vascular-targeted gene therapy was combined with chemotherapeutic agents."( In vivo efficacy of HSV-TK transcriptionally targeted to the tumour vasculature is augmented by combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Harrington, KJ; Marshall, CJ; Mavria, G; Porter, CD, 2005
)
0.33
" In colorectal tumours, combination with irinotecan, a cytotoxic drug used to treat colorectal cancer, significantly increased survival compared to drug alone."( In vivo efficacy of HSV-TK transcriptionally targeted to the tumour vasculature is augmented by combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Harrington, KJ; Marshall, CJ; Mavria, G; Porter, CD, 2005
)
0.59
"We show that the ppET1-targeted vector is efficacious for therapeutic gene expression in vivo, validating a strategy targeted to tumour vasculature, and demonstrate that vascular targeting combined with appropriate chemotherapy is more effective than either therapy alone."( In vivo efficacy of HSV-TK transcriptionally targeted to the tumour vasculature is augmented by combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Harrington, KJ; Marshall, CJ; Mavria, G; Porter, CD, 2005
)
0.33
"To establish the recommended dose (RD) of the thymidylate-synthase inhibitor ZD9331 administered with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer, and to assess toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity in a phase I/II open, multicenter, intrapatient chemotherapy dose escalating trial."( A phase I-II, dose-escalating trial of ZD9331 in combination with irinotecan (CPT11) in previously pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
André, T; de Gramont, A; Gamelin, E; Garcia, ML; Kalla, S; Lenaers, G; Louvet, C; Méry-Mignard, D; Saavedra, A, 2004
)
0.78
"ZD9331 90 mg/m2 combined with CPT-11 180 mg/m2 may be a viable option for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, with possible escalation to 120 mg/m2 of ZD9331 according to safety evaluation."( A phase I-II, dose-escalating trial of ZD9331 in combination with irinotecan (CPT11) in previously pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
André, T; de Gramont, A; Gamelin, E; Garcia, ML; Kalla, S; Lenaers, G; Louvet, C; Méry-Mignard, D; Saavedra, A, 2004
)
0.56
"5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine alone and in combination with irinotecan/oxaliplatin are clinically active in the treatment of colorectal and other solid tumors."( Synergistic antitumor activity of capecitabine in combination with irinotecan.
Cao, S; Durrani, FA; Rustum, YM, 2005
)
0.8
"To assess the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of oral irinotecan given in combination with capecitabine to patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral irinotecan given once daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in combination with capecitabine in patients with solid tumors.
Assadourian, S; deJonge, MJ; Dumez, H; Eskens, FA; Sanderink, GJ; Selleslach, J; Semiond, D; Soepenberg, O; Sparreboom, A; ter Steeg, J; van Oosterom, AT; Verweij, J, 2005
)
0.8
" With irinotecan 60 mg/m2/d and capecitabine 2 x 800 mg/m2/d, grade 3 delayed diarrhea in combination with grade 2 nausea (despite maximal antiemetic support) and grade 3 anorexia and colitis, were the first-cycle dose-limiting toxicities in two of six patients, respectively."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral irinotecan given once daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in combination with capecitabine in patients with solid tumors.
Assadourian, S; deJonge, MJ; Dumez, H; Eskens, FA; Sanderink, GJ; Selleslach, J; Semiond, D; Soepenberg, O; Sparreboom, A; ter Steeg, J; van Oosterom, AT; Verweij, J, 2005
)
1.07
"To establish the feasibility and efficacy of capecitabine in combination with weekly irinotecan (CAPIRI) with concurrent pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer."( Phase I trial of capecitabine and weekly irinotecan in combination with radiotherapy for neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer.
Gnad, U; Hehlmann, R; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, RD; Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U; Müldner, A; Post, S; von Gerstenberg-Helldorf, B; Wenz, F; Willeke, F, 2005
)
0.82
" In the present study, the antitumour activity of XR5944 was investigated in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or irinotecan in human colon carcinoma cell lines and xenografts."( Antitumour activity of XR5944 in vitro and in vivo in combination with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in colon cancer cell lines.
Brown, JL; Charlton, PA; Freathy, C; Harris, SM; Mistry, P, 2005
)
0.76
" This phase I pharmacokinetic and clinical study evaluated escalating CPT-11 doses administered every 3 weeks combined with a fixed dose of 5-FU CI over 14 days to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combined chemotherapy."( A phase I, dose-finding study of irinotecan (CPT-11) short i.v. infusion combined with fixed dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) protracted i.v. infusion in adult patients with advanced solid tumours.
Alfonso, R; Carcas, A; Cortés-Funes, H; Díaz-Rubio, E; Frías, J; Grávalos, C; Guerra, P; Paz-Ares, L; Pronk, L; Sastre, J, 2005
)
0.61
" In step 3, the recommended dose of CPT-11 was divided and administered in a weekly schedule for 4 weeks combined with a fixed dose of 5-FU CI 250 mg/m(2), and then followed by 2-5 weeks rest."( A phase I, dose-finding study of irinotecan (CPT-11) short i.v. infusion combined with fixed dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) protracted i.v. infusion in adult patients with advanced solid tumours.
Alfonso, R; Carcas, A; Cortés-Funes, H; Díaz-Rubio, E; Frías, J; Grávalos, C; Guerra, P; Paz-Ares, L; Pronk, L; Sastre, J, 2005
)
0.61
"To obtain data on drug-drug interactions with irinotecan and oxaliplatin, a literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted using the search terms irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and interactions (English-language studies only published between 1980 and August 2004)."( Classification and occurrence of clinically significant drug interactions with irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Brouwers, JR; Coenen, JL; de Graaf, JC; Idzinga, FS; Jansman, FG; Sleijfer, DT; Smit, WM, 2005
)
0.81
" This study was performed to determine the efficacy and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with fluorouracil (FU) administered as a 48-hour continuous infusion twice a month in elderly patients."( Irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil in a 48-hour continuous infusion as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors study.
Abad, A; Antón, A; Aranda, E; Carrato, A; Díaz-Rubio, E; Gil, S; Maestu, I; Marcuello, E; Masutti, B; Maurel, J; Navarro, M; Sastre, J; Valladares, M; Vicent, JM, 2005
)
2.01
"Twice a month continuous-infusion CPT-11 combined with FU is a valid therapeutic alternative for elderly patients in good general condition."( Irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil in a 48-hour continuous infusion as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors study.
Abad, A; Antón, A; Aranda, E; Carrato, A; Díaz-Rubio, E; Gil, S; Maestu, I; Marcuello, E; Masutti, B; Maurel, J; Navarro, M; Sastre, J; Valladares, M; Vicent, JM, 2005
)
1.77
"To explore the efficacy and safety of CPT-11 combined with fluoropyrimidine in treatment for advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma."( [Irinotecan combined with fluoropyrimidine in treatment for advanced/metastatic colorectal carcinoma].
Wu, WQ; Yu, BM, 2005
)
1.24
" CPT-11 combined with capecitabine are not only more effective, but also its occurrence of side effect is lowered, and are especially high effective for lung metastasis."( [Irinotecan combined with fluoropyrimidine in treatment for advanced/metastatic colorectal carcinoma].
Wu, WQ; Yu, BM, 2005
)
1.24
"The aim of this study was to determine in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine, to identify a recommended dose and to determine the response rate and time to disease progression."( A phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.
Bakker, JM; Falk, S; Groenewegen, G; Kerr, DJ; Maughan, T; Nortier, JW; Punt, CJ; Rea, DW; Richel, DJ; Semiond, D; Smit, JM; Steven, N; Ten Bokkel Huinink, WW, 2005
)
0.79
"Patients with solid tumors received one of three escalating dose levels of daily celecoxib in combination with docetaxel and irinotecan administered on days 1 and 8 of an every 21-day cycle."( A phase I trial of celecoxib in combination with docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer.
Adjei, AA; Croghan, GC; Dy, GK; Furth, A; Hanson, LJ; Mandrekar, S; Okuno, SH; Peethambaram, PP, 2005
)
0.77
" In this study, we investigated the anticancer activity of BGC9331 either alone or combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), MTA (multi-target antifolate), oxali-platin and SN-38, the active metabolite of the topoisomerase I inhibitor CPT-11."( Increased anticancer activity of the thymidylate synthase inhibitor BGC9331 combined with the topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38 in human colorectal and breast cancer cells: induction of apoptosis and ROCK cleavage through caspase-3-dependent and -independen
André, T; Coudray, AM; De Gramont, A; Faivre, S; Gespach, C; Kornprobst, M; Larsen, AK; Louvet, C; Raymond, E; Tournigand, C, 2005
)
0.33
" Due to the difference of concentration between batches containing irinotecan or topotecan, HPLC and HPTLC both combined with fluorescence detection were investigated."( Fluorescence detection combined with either HPLC or HPTLC for pharmaceutical quality control in a hospital chemotherapy production unit: application to camptothecin derivatives.
Bourget, P; Gravel, E; Mercier, L; Paci, A, 2005
)
0.56
" This new oncolytic virus (MGH2) displays increased antitumor efficacy against human glioma cells both in vitro and in vivo when combined with cyclophosphamide and CPT-11."( Brain tumor oncolysis with replication-conditional herpes simplex virus type 1 expressing the prodrug-activating genes, CYP2B1 and secreted human intestinal carboxylesterase, in combination with cyclophosphamide and irinotecan.
Chiocca, EA; Danks, MK; Finkelstein, DM; Hyatt, JL; Leroy, S; Potter, PM; Saeki, Y; Terada, K; Tyminski, E, 2005
)
0.51
" Treatment with triple therapy using octreotide, galanin and serotonin appear to be comparable to 5-FU/LV in combination with irinotecan and oxaliplatin."( Comparison between triple therapy with octreotide, galanin and serotonin vs. irinotecan or oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leukovorin in human colon cancer.
El-Salhy, M; Hilding, L; Royson, H; Tjomsland, V, 2005
)
0.76
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is used successfully for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer."( Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of irinotecan combined with capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Czejka, M; Hauer, K; Ostermann, E; Schueller, J,
)
1.85
"A dose-escalation study of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in advanced gastric cancer."( Phase I study of S-1 combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (OGSG 0002).
Fujitani, K; Furukawa, H; Gotoh, M; Iishi, H; Katsu, K; Kawabe, S; Narahara, H; Taguchi, T; Takiuchi, H; Tatsuta, M; Tsujinaka, T, 2005
)
0.9
"The efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine (XELOX) as second-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) resistant to irinotecan is not well established."( Short-time infusion of oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine (XELOX30) as second-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure to irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil.
Baltesgard, L; Ehrsson, H; Fokstuen, T; Glimelius, B; Mortensen, JP; Pfeiffer, P; Qvortrup, C; Starkhammar, H; Sørbye, H; Tveit, KM; Wallin, I; Øgreid, D, 2006
)
0.73
" Bevacizumab is currently approved for the first-line treatment of metastatic CRC and is currently being tested in combination with standard therapies for a range of indications."( Bevacizumab combined with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens to treat colorectal cancer.
Hurwitz, H; Kabbinavar, F, 2005
)
0.33
" The patient was treated with TS-1 combined with CPT-11."( [A case of an increase in resectability with preoperative chemotherapy TS-1 combined with CPT-11 for unresectable rectal cancer in downstaging].
Doi, M; Egawa, T; Hayashi, S; Kitano, M; Nagashima, A; Yoshii, H, 2005
)
0.33
"The maximum tolerated dose for this combination with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support was identified as imatinib at a dose of 300 mg/day with irinotecan (at a dose of 65 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (at a dose of 30 mg/m(2)) given on Days 1 and 8, every 21 days."( Phase I studies of imatinib mesylate combined with cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with small cell lung carcinoma.
Glisson, BS; Johnson, FM; Krug, LM; Patel, J; Peeples, B; Prieto, VG; Shoaf, S; Tamboli, P; Tran, HT, 2006
)
0.77
"Irinotecan, when combined with cisplatin, is an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)."( Phase I study of cisplatin and irinotecan combined with concurrent hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Asaka-Amano, Y; Itoh, H; Kasahara, Y; Kuriyama, T; Kurosu, K; Takiguchi, Y; Tanabe, N; Tatsumi, K; Uno, T; Uruma, R, 2005
)
2.06
" The protocol consisted of escalating doses of irinotecan on days 1 and 15, and daily low-dose cisplatin (6 mg/m(2) daily for a total dose of 120 mg/m(2)) combined with concurrent hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic irradiation (1."( Phase I study of cisplatin and irinotecan combined with concurrent hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Asaka-Amano, Y; Itoh, H; Kasahara, Y; Kuriyama, T; Kurosu, K; Takiguchi, Y; Tanabe, N; Tatsumi, K; Uno, T; Uruma, R, 2005
)
0.87
" Furthermore, the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with either 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan was similar to that of immunotherapy alone."( Immunotherapy with dendritic cells and CpG oligonucleotides can be combined with chemotherapy without loss of efficacy in a mouse model of colon cancer.
Beck, S; Bourquin, C; Endres, S; Hartmann, G; Schreiber, S, 2006
)
0.56
" This study investigated activated/phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR) in 23 patients with EGFR-positive metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan and treated with cetuximab, alone or in combination with irinotecan."( Correlation between the response to cetuximab alone or in combination with irinotecan and the activated/phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Barette, M; Bleiberg, H; Cardoso, F; Galdon, MG; Gallez, J; Hendlisz, A; Larsimont, D; Nagy, N; Paesmans, M; Personeni, N; Van Laethem, JL, 2005
)
0.76
"We designed and conducted an NCI-sponsored trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of semaxanib given twice weekly in combination with weekly irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who had failed at least one prior treatment."( A Phase I study of escalating doses of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor semaxanib (SU5416) in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Abbruzzese, JL; Bogaard, K; Hoff, PM; Waldrum, S; Wolff, RA, 2006
)
0.74
" After 33 months, a high dose of CDDP was administered twice in combination with TS-1, because elevation of serum CEA levels and paraortic lymphnode swelling were observed for the first time."( [A case of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination who achieved five-year survival by successive treatments with TS-1 alone and in combination with other drugs].
Aiko, S; Ishizuka, T; Kumano, I; Maehara, T; Sakano, T; Sugiura, Y; Yoshizumi, Y, 2006
)
0.33
"A dose-escalation study of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with S-1, an oral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidine, was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and objective response rate (RR) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC)."( Phase I/II study of S-1 combined with irinotecan for metastatic advanced gastric cancer.
Ichikawa, W; Inokuchi, M; Kawano, T; Kojima, K; Nihei, Z; Sugihara, K; Yamada, H; Yamashita, T, 2006
)
0.9
"Twice weekly SU5416 can be administered with bolus IFL without unexpected toxicities or altering the pharmacokinetic behavior of the administered drugs."( Phase I/pilot study of SU5416 (semaxinib) in combination with irinotecan/bolus 5-FU/LV (IFL) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Berlin, JD; Cropp, GF; Donnelly, E; Fleischer, AC; Hande, KR; Hannah, AL; Lockhart, AC; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Schumaker, RD, 2006
)
0.57
"To establish a safe and practical chemotherapeutic regimen using CPT-11 in combination with 5-FU plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in an outpatient setting, a phase I clinical trial was conducted."( A phase I trial of CPT-11 in combination with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Emi, M; Kawabuchi, Y; Minami, K; Yamaguchi, Y,
)
0.13
"These results suggest that our treatment regimen using CPT-11 in combination with 5-FU/LV is a safe regimen in an outpatient setting and effective for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( A phase I trial of CPT-11 in combination with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Emi, M; Kawabuchi, Y; Minami, K; Yamaguchi, Y,
)
0.13
"No significant alterations in the plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites were observed after combination with cetuximab."( In vivo disposition of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its metabolites in combination with the monoclonal antibody cetuximab.
Czejka, M; Ettlinger, DE; Farkouh, A; Mitterhauser, M; Ostermann, E; Schueller, J; Wadsak, W,
)
0.67
" A third pharmacokinetic study was to determine the appropriate dose of intraperitoneal oxaliplatin combined with intraperitoneal irinotecan: the recommended dosage was 360 mg/m2 for each of the chemotherapy agents."( Heated intra-operative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin alone and in combination with intraperitoneal irinotecan: Pharmacologic studies.
Bonnay, M; Elias, D; Pocard, M; Raynard, B, 2006
)
0.76
"To determine the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan combined with carboplatin, we conducted a phase II trial."( Phase II study of irinotecan combined with carboplatin in previously untreated small-cell lung cancer.
Fukuda, M; Kinoshita, A; Kohno, S; Kuba, M; Nagashima, S; Nakamura, Y; Oka, M; Soda, H; Takatani, H; Tsurutani, J, 2006
)
0.93
"Recent clinical studies have demonstrated a reduction of irinotecan (CPT-11) gastrointestinal toxicities when the CPT-11 is administered in combination with thalidomide in patients with diagnosis of colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan in combination with thalidomide in patients with advanced solid tumors: a clinical study with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation.
Allegrini, G; Amatori, F; Bocci, G; Cerri, E; Cupini, S; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Marcucci, L; Masi, G, 2006
)
2.02
" Pharmacokinetic data suggested a decreased metabolism of irinotecan into SN-38 and SN-38-glucuronide when it was administered with thalidomide."( Irinotecan in combination with thalidomide in patients with advanced solid tumors: a clinical study with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation.
Allegrini, G; Amatori, F; Bocci, G; Cerri, E; Cupini, S; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Marcucci, L; Masi, G, 2006
)
2.02
" It is possible that lamivudine combined with chemotherapy may have had a therapeutic effect on ATL in this case."( [Development of acute type, CD 8 positive adult T-cell leukemia in a carrier of hepatitis B virus--possible therapeutic effect of lamivudine combined with chemotherapy].
Hasegawa, H; Miyagi, T; Nagasaki, A; Nakachi, S; Shinzato, O; Taira, N; Takasu, N; Tomoyose, T, 2006
)
0.33
"To evaluate the efficacy of Avastin in combination with irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer."( [Efficacy of Avastin in combination with irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer].
Chen, JZ; Liao, WJ; Luo, RC; Zheng, H, 2006
)
0.85
"A combination phase I study was conducted in a cohort of lung cancer patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicities of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, in combination with amrubicin (AMR), a topoisomerase II inhibitor, and to observe their antitumor activities."( A phase I study of irinotecan in combination with amrubicin for advanced lung cancer patients.
Fukuoka, M; Kaneda, H; Kurata, T; Nakagawa, K; Tamura, K; Uejima, H,
)
0.66
" Because of its wide spectrum of actions, it is reasonable to consider the combination with other anticancer drugs in clinical application."( Cytotoxic effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor FK228 (depsipeptide, formally named FR901228) in combination with conventional anti-leukemia/lymphoma agents against human leukemia/lymphoma cell lines.
Akutsu, M; Furukawa, Y; Izumi, T; Kano, Y; Kobayashi, H; Mano, H; Tsunoda, S, 2007
)
0.34
"Patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled to this single arm phase II multi-center cooperative group trial of bevacizumab combined with IFL."( A phase II study of high-dose bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, as initial therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E2200.
Benson, AB; Catalano, PJ; Giantonio, BJ; Levy, DE; Meropol, NJ; O'dwyer, PJ, 2006
)
0.57
" We designed a new regimen to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of weekly low dose CPT-11 combined with 5-FU/l-LV therapy based on an RPMI regimen against advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer."( [Evaluation of weekly low-dose CPT-11 combined with 5-FU/l-LV therapy for advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer--preliminary study].
Deguchi, Y; Kaneko, I; Kii, E; Murata, T; Sonoda, K; Tsubono, M; Yasuda, K, 2006
)
0.33
" Hyperthermia has been shown to enhance the cytotoxic effect of some anticancer drugs and has been combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis."( In vitro thermochemotherapy of colon cancer cell lines with irinotecan alone and combined with mitomycin C.
Benhamed, M; Chipponi, J; Gilly, FN; Glehen, O; Kwiatkowski, F; Le Page, S; Mohamed, F; Paulin, C; Pezet, D,
)
0.37
" After that his general condition recovered, and two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin (IFL) therapy were performed on an outpatient basis."( [A case of advanced rectal carcinoma with multiple lung metastases responding to irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin (IFL) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)].
Fukada, T; Hasegawa, A; Hashimoto, R; Hayashi, T; Kametaka, H; Kawano, H; Koyama, T; Seike, K; Tanaka, H; Yasuno, K, 2006
)
0.78
"Irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 combined with an infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) regimen (FOLFIRI) is a standard first line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Multicentre phase II study using increasing doses of irinotecan combined with a simplified LV5FU2 regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bressole, F; Chalbos, P; Debrigode, C; Desseigne, F; Duffour, J; Gourgou, S; Mineur, L; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Ychou, M, 2007
)
2.03
"Patients received FOLFIRI every 2 weeks for up to six cycles, comprising a 5-FU/LV regimen combined with irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 (cycle 1), increasing to 220 mg/m2 (cycle 2) and 260 mg/m2 (cycle 3 and subsequent cycles) dependent on toxicity."( Multicentre phase II study using increasing doses of irinotecan combined with a simplified LV5FU2 regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bressole, F; Chalbos, P; Debrigode, C; Desseigne, F; Duffour, J; Gourgou, S; Mineur, L; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Ychou, M, 2007
)
0.8
" Antineoplastic activity of LY293111 has been identified in preclinical models both alone and in combination with chemotherapy agents including irinotecan."( A phase I study of oral LY293111 given daily in combination with irinotecan in patients with solid tumours.
Baetz, T; Brail, LH; de Alwis, DP; Doppler, K; Eisenhauer, E; Fisher, B; Khan, AZ; MacLean, M; Moore, M; Siu, L; Walsh, W; Weitzman, A, 2007
)
0.78
"Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 diarrhea was seen in two patients with doses of irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) IV every 21-days in combination with LY293111 300 mg BID."( A phase I study of oral LY293111 given daily in combination with irinotecan in patients with solid tumours.
Baetz, T; Brail, LH; de Alwis, DP; Doppler, K; Eisenhauer, E; Fisher, B; Khan, AZ; MacLean, M; Moore, M; Siu, L; Walsh, W; Weitzman, A, 2007
)
0.8
"The recommended phase II dose of LY293111 is 600 mg orally BID in combination with irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) IV every 21-days."( A phase I study of oral LY293111 given daily in combination with irinotecan in patients with solid tumours.
Baetz, T; Brail, LH; de Alwis, DP; Doppler, K; Eisenhauer, E; Fisher, B; Khan, AZ; MacLean, M; Moore, M; Siu, L; Walsh, W; Weitzman, A, 2007
)
0.8
" This phase I/II dose-finding study evaluated gefitinib in combination with a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA)/irinotecan (FOLFIRI-AIO) regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer."( Gefitinib in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid and irinotecan in patients with 5-FU/oxaliplatin- refractory colorectal cancer: a phase I/II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie (AIO).
Arnold, D; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, RD; Kubicka, S; Wollert, J, 2006
)
0.78
" Only the initial 1 course was administered with 5-FU (500 mg/body) as an inpatient, and further courses were performed as an outpatient with no severe adverse events."( A case report--The marked response to gemcitabine combined with irinotecan and low-dose cisplatin chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases.
Fujiwara, T; Gochi, A; Kagawa, S; Tanaka, N; Teraishi, F; Uno, F, 2006
)
0.57
" This was the first case of esophageal small cell carcinoma treated by EMR combined with chemoradiotherapy."( [Superficial small cell carcinoma of esophagus treated by endoscopic mucosal resection combined with chemoradiotherapy--a case report].
Hashimoto, T; Izumi, Y; Kato, T; Kawada, K; Miura, A; Momma, K; Oota, M, 2007
)
0.34
"To assess the optimal regimen and its mechanism of ZD1839 in combination with SN38, the active metabolite of irinotecan (CPT-11), in the colon cancer cell lines HT-29 and LoVo."( [Experimental study of effect of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 in combination with irinotecan].
Azzariti, A; Han, Y; Li, YM; Li, ZQ; Paradiso, A; Wang, Y; Xu, JM; Yang, WW; Yuan, SJ; Zhao, CH, 2006
)
0.75
"This randomised phase II study evaluates the safety and efficacy profile of uracil/tegafur/leucovorin combined with irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) or with oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX)."( Uracil/ftorafur/leucovorin combined with irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) or oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of randomised phase II study.
Aitini, E; Bajetta, E; Barone, C; Buzzoni, R; Di Bartolomeo, M; Ferrario, E; Iop, A; Isa, L; Jacobelli, S; Lo Vullo, S; Mariani, L; Pinotti, G; Recaldin, E; Zilembo, N, 2007
)
0.82
"To estimate the antitumor activity and toxicity of irinotecan alone and in combination with vincristine when administered as window therapy and in combination with standard chemotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma."( Two consecutive phase II window trials of irinotecan alone or in combination with vincristine for the treatment of metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: the Children's Oncology Group.
Breitfeld, P; Crews, KR; Donaldson, SS; Houghton, P; Lyden, E; Meyer, WH; Pappo, AS; Parham, D; Wiener, E, 2007
)
0.86
"We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety data of a combination regimen using weekly irinotecan in combination with capecitabine and concurrent radiotherapy (CapIri-RT) as neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer in a phase-II trial."( A phase II study of capecitabine and irinotecan in combination with concurrent pelvic radiotherapy (CapIri-RT) as neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.
Grobholz, R; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, RD; Horisberger, K; Kähler, G; Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U; Leitner, A; Post, S; Wenz, F; Willeke, F; Willer, A, 2007
)
0.83
"The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with solid tumors."( Phase I study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with solid tumors: preliminary evidence of activity in small cell and neuroendocrine carcinomas.
Antonia, S; Chiappori, A; de Lima Lopes, G; Haura, E; Langevin, M; Lush, R; Rocha-Lima, CM; Simon, G; Sullivan, D, 2007
)
0.77
"Carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine and irinotecan was feasible."( Phase I study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with solid tumors: preliminary evidence of activity in small cell and neuroendocrine carcinomas.
Antonia, S; Chiappori, A; de Lima Lopes, G; Haura, E; Langevin, M; Lush, R; Rocha-Lima, CM; Simon, G; Sullivan, D, 2007
)
0.83
"We conducted a randomised phase II study to compare irinotecan monotherapy with irinotecan in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) regarding efficacy and safety of these regimens in second-line therapy after failed fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( A randomised phase II study of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA compared with irinotecan alone as second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Arnold, D; Graeven, U; Heuer, T; Nusch, A; Porschen, R; Reinacher-Schick, A; Schmiegel, W, 2007
)
0.88
"Our study confirms that irinotecan alone or in combination with infusional 5-FU/FA is an effective and safe regimen for CRC patients who failed first-line therapies."( A randomised phase II study of irinotecan in combination with 5-FU/FA compared with irinotecan alone as second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Arnold, D; Graeven, U; Heuer, T; Nusch, A; Porschen, R; Reinacher-Schick, A; Schmiegel, W, 2007
)
0.93
"The effects of the anticancer drug irinotecan combined with ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP), a water-soluble derivate of propolis (WSDP), quercetin and naringin on the growth of Ehrlich ascites tumor (EAT) and the life span of tumor-bearing Swiss albino mice were studied."( Enhanced antitumor activity of irinotecan combined with propolis and its polyphenolic compounds on Ehrlich ascites tumor in mice.
Basic, I; Benkovic, V; Bevanda, M; Brozovic, G; Dikic, D; Horvat Knezevic, A; Knezevic, F; Orsolic, N, 2007
)
0.9
"APC and SN-38 exposure decreased when administered in combination with UCN-01."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of UCN-01 in combination with irinotecan in patients with solid tumors.
Baker, SD; Carducci, MA; Dancey, J; Donehower, RC; Hidalgo, M; Jimeno, A; Laheru, DA; Messersmith, WA; Purcell, T; Rudek, MA, 2008
)
0.58
"We evaluated whether the expression of measles virus fusogenic membrane glycoproteins H and F (MV-FMG), encoded by a herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) amplicon vector, can serve with or without viral oncolysis (G47Delta) and facultative irinotecan chemotherapy, alone or in combination with the monoclonal epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitory antibody cetuximab, as a platform for inducing tumor-specific immune responses against colon cancer."( Local and distant immune-mediated control of colon cancer growth with fusogenic membrane glycoproteins in combination with viral oncolysis.
Bayer, W; Hoffmann, D; Wildner, O, 2007
)
0.52
" Resection of liver metastases from SBA combined with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy can result in extended disease-free survival and should undergo further investigation."( Resection of small bowel adenocarcinoma liver metastasis combined with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy results in extended disease-free period--a case report.
Eigenbrod, T; Klebl, F; Kullmann, F, 2006
)
0.33
"This study determined the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR) of oral lapatinib administered in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and assessed the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the combination."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of lapatinib in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan.
Flaherty, KT; Fleming, RA; Kerr, DJ; Koch, KM; Middleton, MR; Midgley, RS; O'Dwyer, PJ; Pratap, SE; Smith, DA; Stevenson, JP; Versola, M; Ward, C, 2007
)
0.75
"This in vivo study was designed to determine the optimal doses and schedules of vandetanib, a dual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan in a murine xenograft model of human colon cancer."( Investigation of two dosing schedules of vandetanib (ZD6474), an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, in combination with irinotecan in a human colon cancer xenograft model.
Ciardiello, F; Eckhardt, SG; Gustafson, DL; Henthorn, TK; Lockerbie, O; Long, M; Merz, A; Morrow, M; Serkova, NJ; Troiani, T, 2007
)
0.71
"The greatest antitumor efficacy was observed in the groups receiving the highest dose of vandetanib given continuously (concurrent schedule), alone or in combination with irinotecan."( Investigation of two dosing schedules of vandetanib (ZD6474), an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, in combination with irinotecan in a human colon cancer xenograft model.
Ciardiello, F; Eckhardt, SG; Gustafson, DL; Henthorn, TK; Lockerbie, O; Long, M; Merz, A; Morrow, M; Serkova, NJ; Troiani, T, 2007
)
0.72
"These data suggest that higher, sustained concentrations of vandetanib (versus intermittent), alone and in combination with irinotecan, result in optimal antitumor efficacy in this model and may have implications for the design of future clinical studies with this drug."( Investigation of two dosing schedules of vandetanib (ZD6474), an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, in combination with irinotecan in a human colon cancer xenograft model.
Ciardiello, F; Eckhardt, SG; Gustafson, DL; Henthorn, TK; Lockerbie, O; Long, M; Merz, A; Morrow, M; Serkova, NJ; Troiani, T, 2007
)
0.74
"We conducted a phase I study to determine the recommended dose of selenomethionine (SLM) in combination with irinotecan that consistently results in a protective plasma selenium (Se) concentrations > 15 microM after 1 week of SLM loading."( A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of selenomethionine in combination with a fixed dose of irinotecan in solid tumors.
Badmaev, V; Brady, W; Creaven, PJ; Fakih, MG; Pendyala, L; Prey, JD; Ross, ME; Rustum, YM; Smith, PF, 2008
)
0.78
"Selenomethionine can be escalated safely to 7,200 mcg BID x 1 week followed by 7,200 mcg QD in combination with a standard dose of irinotecan."( A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of selenomethionine in combination with a fixed dose of irinotecan in solid tumors.
Badmaev, V; Brady, W; Creaven, PJ; Fakih, MG; Pendyala, L; Prey, JD; Ross, ME; Rustum, YM; Smith, PF, 2008
)
0.77
"To determine the recommended dose (RD) of EKB-569, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with FOLFIRI chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of EKB-569, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of patients with
Abbas, R; Andreu, J; Baselga, J; Casado, E; Cortes-Funes, H; Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lejeune, C; Marimón, I; Paz-Ares, L; Quinn, S; Rojo, F; Salazar, R; Tabernero, J; Ubbelohde, U; Zacharchuk, C, 2008
)
0.54
"The RD of EKB-569 is 25 mg/day when combined with FOLFIRI and results in complete EGFR inhibition."( Phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of EKB-569, an irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of patients with
Abbas, R; Andreu, J; Baselga, J; Casado, E; Cortes-Funes, H; Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lejeune, C; Marimón, I; Paz-Ares, L; Quinn, S; Rojo, F; Salazar, R; Tabernero, J; Ubbelohde, U; Zacharchuk, C, 2008
)
0.54
" This study was conducted to investigate the advantages of NK012 over irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) administered in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU)."( Synergistic antitumor activity of the novel SN-38-incorporating polymeric micelles, NK012, combined with 5-fluorouracil in a mouse model of colorectal cancer, as compared with that of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil.
Hamaguchi, T; Kano, Y; Kato, K; Koizumi, F; Matsumura, Y; Nakajima, TE; Shimada, Y; Shirao, K; Yamada, Y; Yasunaga, M, 2008
)
0.77
" The patient was treated with S-1 combined with CPT-11."( [An elderly patient with recurrent rectal cancer successfully responded to S-1 combined with CPT-11].
Doi, M; Egawa, T; Hayashi, S; Ito, Y; Kitano, M; Nagashima, A; Sekine, K; Shimizu, M; Yoshii, H, 2007
)
0.34
"Oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine prolongs survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Chronomodulated capecitabine in combination with short-time oxaliplatin: a Nordic phase II study of second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure to irinotecan and 5-flourouracil.
Balteskard, L; Berglund, A; Fokstuen, T; Ogreid, D; Pfeiffer, P; Ploen, J; Qvortrup, C; Starkhammar, H; Sørbye, H; Tveit, K; Yilmaz, M, 2008
)
0.54
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with UFT for untreated and pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of 24-hour infusion of irinotecan combined with oral UFT for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ishikawa, K; Maeda, Y; Makuuchi, H; Murayama, C; Sadahiro, S; Suzuki, T; Yasuda, S, 2008
)
0.88
"A 24-hour infusion of irinotecan combined with UFT is feasible and active for metastatic colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of 24-hour infusion of irinotecan combined with oral UFT for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ishikawa, K; Maeda, Y; Makuuchi, H; Murayama, C; Sadahiro, S; Suzuki, T; Yasuda, S, 2008
)
0.93
" Pharmacokinetic data suggested no drug-drug interaction."( Safety of repeated administrations of ixabepilone given as a 3-hour infusion every other week in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced malignancies.
Boige, V; Cohen, M; Delbaldo, C; Faivre, S; Namouni, F; Pautier, P; Peck, R; Raymond, E; Soria, JC, 2008
)
0.56
" We conducted a trial involving a 3-week schedule of irinotecan combined with cisplatin (IP) to validate the efficacy and toxicity of this regimen in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC)."( Phase II study of a 3-week schedule of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Jung, SS; Kim, JO; Kim, SY; Lee, JE; Park, HS, 2007
)
0.86
" Irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 in combination with cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days."( Phase II study of a 3-week schedule of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Jung, SS; Kim, JO; Kim, SY; Lee, JE; Park, HS, 2007
)
1.52
"Irinotecan toxicity is more likely in patients with Gilbert's syndrome carrying the UGT1A1*28 allele combined with reduced function UGT1A7 N129K/R131K and UGT1A7-57T/G SNP."( Gilbert's Syndrome and irinotecan toxicity: combination with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 variants increases risk.
Erichsen, TJ; Heinemann, V; Lankisch, TO; Manns, MP; Schulz, C; Strassburg, CP; Zwingers, T, 2008
)
2.1
"This study was designed to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo efficacy of TRA-8, a mouse monoclonal antibody that binds to the DR5 death receptor for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (also called Apo2L), alone and in combination with CPT-11, against human colon cancer cells and xenografts."( Treatment of human colon cancer xenografts with TRA-8 anti-death receptor 5 antibody alone or in combination with CPT-11.
Buchsbaum, DJ; Kim, H; LoBuglio, AF; Nan, L; Oliver, PG; Wang, W; Zhou, T; Zinn, KR, 2008
)
0.35
"DR5 expression was assessed on human colon cancer cell lines using flow cytometry, and cellular cytotoxicity after TRA-8 treatment, alone and in combination with SN-38, was determined by measuring cellular ATP levels."( Treatment of human colon cancer xenografts with TRA-8 anti-death receptor 5 antibody alone or in combination with CPT-11.
Buchsbaum, DJ; Kim, H; LoBuglio, AF; Nan, L; Oliver, PG; Wang, W; Zhou, T; Zinn, KR, 2008
)
0.35
" Metronomic CPT-11 alone and combined with semaxinib significantly inhibits tumour growth in the absence of toxicity, which was accompanied by decreases in microvessel density and increases in TSP-1 gene expression in tumour tissues."( Antiangiogenic and anticolorectal cancer effects of metronomic irinotecan chemotherapy alone and in combination with semaxinib.
Allegrini, G; Bocci, G; Danesi, R; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Fanelli, G; Fioravanti, A; Kerbel, RS; Naccarato, AG; Orlandi, P; Viacava, P, 2008
)
0.59
"Gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg daily in combination with weekly 5-fluorouracil at 2,000 mg/m(2) or gefitinib at a dose of 500 mg daily with 5-fluorouracil at 1,600 mg/m(2) plus oxaliplatin has an acceptable safety profile."( Gefitinib in combination with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in irinotecan-refractory patients with colorectal cancer: a phase I study of the Arbeits gemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO).
Bokemeyer, C; Hartmann, JT; Höhler, T; Holtmann, M; Kröning, H; Pintoffl, JP, 2008
)
0.58
"We conducted a dose escalation study of Am in combination with CPT to determine the qualitative and quantitative toxicities and efficacy against extensive (ED) SCLC."( Dose escalation study of amrubicin in combination with fixed-dose irinotecan in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer.
Oshita, F; Saito, H; Yamada, K, 2008
)
0.58
" We then examined the antitumor effect of IAB-1 in combination with anticancer drugs against RCC."( Significant antitumor activity of cationic multilamellar liposomes containing human interferon-beta gene in combination with 5-fluorouracil against human renal cell carcinoma.
Abe, K; Fujiwara, J; Hayashi, I; Ishida, H; Kawauchi, A; Miki, T; Mizuno, M; Mizutani, Y; Nakanishi, H; Okada, K; Toiyama, D; Yamamoto, K; Yoshida, J, 2008
)
0.35
" The FOLFIRI regimen consisted of irinotecan (180 mg/m(2); day 1) combined with leucovorin (200 mg/m(2)), followed by 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) as a bolus and 600 mg/m(2) as a 22-h infusion on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks."( Irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic or relapsed gastric cancer.
Bang, YJ; Im, SA; Kim, DY; Kim, JH; Kim, TY; Lee, JS; Lee, KW; Lim, JH; Oh, DY; Seo, MD; Yi, HG, 2008
)
2.07
" We treated the patient with S-1 combined with CPT-11."( [Three cases with liver metastasis from gastric or colon cancer successfully treated with S-1 combined with CPT- 11].
Ishii, Y; Mado, K; Manmoto, J; Masuda, H; Mazaki, T; Okame, H; Suzuki, K; Takayama, T, 2008
)
0.35
" The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine, in substitution of 5-fluorouracil, combined with oxaliplatin and irinotecan and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the drugs."( A dose finding and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Antonuzzo, A; Bocci, G; Bursi, S; Chiara, S; Del Tacca, M; Di Paolo, A; Falcone, A; Fornaro, L; Loupakis, F; Masi, G; Pfanner, E; Vasile, E, 2009
)
0.77
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in combination with cetuximab, capecitabine, and irinotecan in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer."( Cetuximab in combination with capecitabine, irinotecan, and radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: results of a Phase II MARGIT trial.
Barreto-Miranda, M; Dinter, D; Erben, P; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, RD; Horisberger, K; Kähler, G; Kienle, P; Mai, S; Post, S; Ströbel, P; Treschl, A; Wenz, F; Willeke, F; Woernle, C, 2009
)
0.82
"Patients with rectal cancer (clinical stage T3/4 or N+) were scheduled to receive cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) Day 1, 250 mg/m(2) Days 8, 15, 22, 29) in combination with weekly irinotecan 40 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 500 mg/m(2) twice daily (Days 1-38)."( Cetuximab in combination with capecitabine, irinotecan, and radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: results of a Phase II MARGIT trial.
Barreto-Miranda, M; Dinter, D; Erben, P; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, RD; Horisberger, K; Kähler, G; Kienle, P; Mai, S; Post, S; Ströbel, P; Treschl, A; Wenz, F; Willeke, F; Woernle, C, 2009
)
0.81
"A total of 342 patients received irinotecan-based chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy: FOLFIRI-3 [n = 109, irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) days 1 and 3 combined with leucovorin (LV) 400 mg/m(2) day 1 and 46-h continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2000 mg/m(2)], FOLFIRI-1 (n = 112, irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) day 1 combined with LV 400 mg/m(2) day 1, 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) and 46-h continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m(2)) and other various irinotecan-based regimens (n = 121)."( Efficacy of FOLFIRI-3 (irinotecan D1,D3 combined with LV5-FU) or other irinotecan-based regimens in oxaliplatin-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer in the GERCOR OPTIMOX1 study.
André, T; Bengrine-Lefevre, L; Bidard, FC; Cervantes, A; de Gramont, A; Figer, A; Lledo, G; Louvet, C; Mabro, M; Maindrault-Goebel, F; Tournigand, C, 2009
)
0.94
" To determine the feasibility of S-1 combined with weekly irinotecan for patients with advanced NSCLC, we performed a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of irinotecan."( Phase I study of daily S-1 combined with weekly irinotecan in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Honda, Y; Ishida, T; Ishimoto, O; Munakata, M; Sugawara, S, 2009
)
0.85
" This phase I/II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous infusion of irinotecan combined with UFT plus leucovorin (LV) for metastatic colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of twenty-four-hour infusion of irinotecan in combination with oral UFT plus leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ishikawa, K; Maeda, Y; Makuuchi, H; Murayama, C; Sadahiro, S; Suzuki, T; Tanaka, A, 2009
)
0.82
"A 24-hour infusion of irinotecan combined with UFT/LV is feasible and active for metastatic colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II study of twenty-four-hour infusion of irinotecan in combination with oral UFT plus leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Ishikawa, K; Maeda, Y; Makuuchi, H; Murayama, C; Sadahiro, S; Suzuki, T; Tanaka, A, 2009
)
0.92
"This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab combined with irinotecan, folinic acid (FA) and two different doses of infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line treatment of EGFR-detectable metastatic colorectal cancer."( Cetuximab in combination with irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (FOLFIRI) in the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre two-part phase I/II study.
Brezault, C; Cals, L; Husseini, F; Loos, AH; Nippgen, J; Peeters, M; Raoul, JL; Rougier, P; Van Laethem, JL, 2009
)
0.84
"To investigate the advantages of treatment with the SN-38-incorporating polymeric micelles NK012 over CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin [cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum (II) (CDDP)] in mice bearing a small cell lung cancer xenograft in terms of antitumor activity and toxicity, particularly intestinal toxicity."( Antitumor activity of NK012 combined with cisplatin against small cell lung cancer and intestinal mucosal changes in tumor-bearing mouse after treatment.
Goto, K; Kenmotsu, H; Koga, Y; Kuroda, J; Matsumura, Y; Nagano, T; Nishimura, Y; Nishiwaki, Y; Sugino, T; Yasunaga, M, 2009
)
0.35
"The chemotherapy of bevacizumab combined with irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin results in better efficacy in patients with progressive metastatic colorectal cancer."( [Clinical research of bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer].
Chen, B; Chen, JZ; Cui, F; Luo, RC; Wan, C; Zheng, H, 2009
)
0.86
"To determine the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) or irinotecan (CAPIRI) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer aged > or =70 years."( Capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II study.
Bordonaro, R; Caputo, G; Cordio, S; Manzione, L; Novello, G; Reggiardo, G; Rosati, G, 2010
)
0.83
"We evaluated the efficacy of bevacizumab, alone and in combination with irinotecan, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma in a phase II, multicenter, open-label, noncomparative trial."( Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma.
Abrey, LE; Cloughesy, T; Friedman, HS; Huang, J; Jensen, R; Mikkelsen, T; Nicholas, MK; Paleologos, N; Prados, MD; Schiff, D; Vredenburgh, J; Wen, PY; Yung, WK; Zheng, M, 2009
)
0.85
"One hundred sixty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive bevacizumab 10 mg/kg alone or in combination with irinotecan 340 mg/m(2) or 125 mg/m(2) (with or without concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, respectively) once every 2 weeks."( Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma.
Abrey, LE; Cloughesy, T; Friedman, HS; Huang, J; Jensen, R; Mikkelsen, T; Nicholas, MK; Paleologos, N; Prados, MD; Schiff, D; Vredenburgh, J; Wen, PY; Yung, WK; Zheng, M, 2009
)
0.83
"Bevacizumab, alone or in combination with irinotecan, was well tolerated and active in recurrent glioblastoma."( Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma.
Abrey, LE; Cloughesy, T; Friedman, HS; Huang, J; Jensen, R; Mikkelsen, T; Nicholas, MK; Paleologos, N; Prados, MD; Schiff, D; Vredenburgh, J; Wen, PY; Yung, WK; Zheng, M, 2009
)
0.88
" We explored the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate or in combination with cisplatin, docetaxel, or irinotecan in a multi-institutional, randomized, phase II study."( Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate or in combination with cisplatin, docetaxel, or irinotecan in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: CALGB 89904.
Cusnir, M; Enzinger, PC; Goldberg, RM; Gorsch, SM; Hollis, DR; Kindler, HL; Kulke, MH; Mayer, RJ; Niedzwiecki, D; Tempero, MA, 2009
)
0.76
" The recommended phase II dose of flavopiridol was 45 mg/m in combination with irinotecan and gemcitabine every 2 weeks."( A phase I study of flavopiridol in combination with gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with metastatic cancer.
Chyi Lee, F; Fekrazad, HM; Rabinowitz, I; Royce, M; Smith, HO; Verschraegen, CF, 2010
)
0.82
"The every 2 week dosing is well tolerated with a phase II recommended dose of 45 mg/m of flavopiridol in combination with irinotecan (80 mg/m) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m)."( A phase I study of flavopiridol in combination with gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with metastatic cancer.
Chyi Lee, F; Fekrazad, HM; Rabinowitz, I; Royce, M; Smith, HO; Verschraegen, CF, 2010
)
0.8
" Selected cardiac glycosides were tested in combination with four clinically relevant cytotoxic drugs (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, cisplatin, irinotecan)."( Cytotoxic effects of cardiac glycosides in colon cancer cells, alone and in combination with standard chemotherapeutic drugs.
Bohlin, L; Felth, J; Fryknäs, M; Gullbo, J; Lindskog, M; Rickardson, L; Rosén, J; Wickström, M, 2009
)
0.55
"Studies showed that cetuximab combined with chemotherapy was effective on advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) in recent years, however, few reports based on large case cohort are available in China."( [Efficacy of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy on advanced colorectal cancer: a report of 53 cases].
Chen, XX; Guo, GF; Hu, PL; Jiang, WQ; Liu, MZ; Qiu, HJ; Xia, LP; Zhang, B; Zhou, FF, 2009
)
0.35
"Clinical data of 53 patients with ACRC, treated with cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center from March 2005 to April 2008, were analyzed for short-term efficacy and safety."( [Efficacy of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy on advanced colorectal cancer: a report of 53 cases].
Chen, XX; Guo, GF; Hu, PL; Jiang, WQ; Liu, MZ; Qiu, HJ; Xia, LP; Zhang, B; Zhou, FF, 2009
)
0.35
"Cetuximab combined with chemotherapy can achieve relatively high disease control rate for ACRC patients, with less adverse events."( [Efficacy of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy on advanced colorectal cancer: a report of 53 cases].
Chen, XX; Guo, GF; Hu, PL; Jiang, WQ; Liu, MZ; Qiu, HJ; Xia, LP; Zhang, B; Zhou, FF, 2009
)
0.35
" Under hypoxic conditions, the expression of HIF-1alpha and VEGF increased as time accumulated, Bevacizumab combined with SN-38 almost completely inhibited the expression of HIF-1alpha and VEGF."( [Combination with SN-38 on human colon cancer LoVo cells].
Song, ST; Wang, Y; Xu, JM; Xu, QZ; Zhou, PK, 2009
)
0.35
"We studied the safety and tolerability of telatinib, an orally available, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR-2/VEGFR-3), platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta, and c-Kit in combination with capecitabine and irinotecan."( Phase I evaluation of telatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan and capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Brendel, E; Laferriere, N; Langenberg, MH; Mergui-Roelvink, M; Roodhart, JM; Schellens, JH; van der Sar, J; Verheul, HM; Voest, EE; Witteveen, PO, 2010
)
0.74
"Continuous administration of 900 mg telatinib twice daily can be safely combined with irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) and capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily, day 1-14) and is the recommended schedule for further phase II studies."( Phase I evaluation of telatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan and capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Brendel, E; Laferriere, N; Langenberg, MH; Mergui-Roelvink, M; Roodhart, JM; Schellens, JH; van der Sar, J; Verheul, HM; Voest, EE; Witteveen, PO, 2010
)
0.79
" To evaluate further the potential therapeutic impact of metronomic chemotherapy for ovarian cancer, we developed a preclinical model of advanced human ovarian cancer and tested various low-dose metronomic chemotherapy regimens alone or in concurrent combination with an antiangiogenic drug, pazopanib."( Potent preclinical impact of metronomic low-dose oral topotecan combined with the antiangiogenic drug pazopanib for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
Cruz-Munoz, W; Hashimoto, K; Kerbel, RS; Kumar, R; Man, S; Tang, T; Xu, P, 2010
)
0.36
"To evaluate the short-term efficacy and toxicity of endostar in combination with XELIRI as the second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer."( [Short-term therapeutic effect and safety of endostar combined with XELIRI regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer].
Liao, WJ; Luo, RC; Shen, P; Shi, M; Wu, Wy, 2010
)
0.36
"Endostar combined with XELIRI is effective and safe as the second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, and further clinical investigation is warranted."( [Short-term therapeutic effect and safety of endostar combined with XELIRI regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer].
Liao, WJ; Luo, RC; Shen, P; Shi, M; Wu, Wy, 2010
)
0.36
" In the current study, the authors examined the antitumor effect of NK012 in combination with Bv against human lung cancer."( The antitumor activity of NK012, an SN-38-incorporating micelle, in combination with bevacizumab against lung cancer xenografts.
Goto, K; Kenmotsu, H; Koga, Y; Kuroda, J; Matsumura, Y; Nagano, T; Nishiwaki, Y; Takahashi, A; Yasunaga, M, 2010
)
0.36
"Nude mice bearing lung adenocarcinoma (PC-14 or A549 xenografts) were administered NK012 at SN-38-equivalent doses of 5 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg in combination with or without Bv at 5 mg/kg."( The antitumor activity of NK012, an SN-38-incorporating micelle, in combination with bevacizumab against lung cancer xenografts.
Goto, K; Kenmotsu, H; Koga, Y; Kuroda, J; Matsumura, Y; Nagano, T; Nishiwaki, Y; Takahashi, A; Yasunaga, M, 2010
)
0.36
"In this study, significant antitumor activity was noted with NK012 in combination with Bv against lung cancer cells."( The antitumor activity of NK012, an SN-38-incorporating micelle, in combination with bevacizumab against lung cancer xenografts.
Goto, K; Kenmotsu, H; Koga, Y; Kuroda, J; Matsumura, Y; Nagano, T; Nishiwaki, Y; Takahashi, A; Yasunaga, M, 2010
)
0.36
" Irinotecan showed genotoxic activity in combination with the new platinum(II) derivatives in cancer cells."( Genotoxic effects of irinotecan combined with the novel platinum(II) complexes in human cancer cells.
Kalinowska-Lis, U; Kontek, R; Marciniak, B; Matlawska-Wasowska, K, 2010
)
1.59
"This trial aimed to define a recommended safe dose (RSD) of weekly paclitaxel and irinotecan combined with carboplatin in patients with advanced cancer."( Phase I trial of weekly irinotecan and paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in patients with advanced cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study.
Briasoulis, E; Fountzilas, G; Golfinopoulos, V; Karina, M; Papakostas, P; Pavlidis, N, 2010
)
0.89
"Generally, there was little difference in CPT-11 pharmacokinetics when combined with CTX in the 11 enrolled patients."( Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in combination with biweekly cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Czejka, M; Farkouh, A; Gruenberger, B; Kiss, A; Schueller, J, 2010
)
0.68
" We investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of sunitinib in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours."( A phase I, dose-finding study of sunitinib in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours.
Armand, JP; Boven, E; Brega, NM; Countouriotis, AM; Hartog, V; Massard, C; Ruiz-Garcia, A; Soria, JC; Tillier, C, 2010
)
0.83
" Paired observations of pharmacokinetic parameter values of sunitinib and irinotecan alone vs the combination did not reveal significant drug-drug interactions."( A phase I, dose-finding study of sunitinib in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours.
Armand, JP; Boven, E; Brega, NM; Countouriotis, AM; Hartog, V; Massard, C; Ruiz-Garcia, A; Soria, JC; Tillier, C, 2010
)
0.83
"Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is shown to have similar efficacy to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when used both alone and in combination with oxaliplatin in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC)."( Differences in efficacy and safety between capecitabine and infusional 5-fluorouracil when combined with irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aliberti, C; Chiriatti, A; Fiorentini, G; Licitra, S; Montagnani, F, 2010
)
0.57
" Hazard ratios for progression and death were combined with an inverse variance method based on logarithmic conversion."( Differences in efficacy and safety between capecitabine and infusional 5-fluorouracil when combined with irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aliberti, C; Chiriatti, A; Fiorentini, G; Licitra, S; Montagnani, F, 2010
)
0.57
" The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this regimen in combination with bevacizumab (BV), as first-line treatment for mCRC."( Bevacizumab in combination with biweekly capecitabine and irinotecan, as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alvarez-Suarez, S; García-Alfonso, P; Jerez-Gilarranz, Y; Khosravi, P; Martin, M; Muñoz-Martin, AJ; Riesco-Martinez, M, 2010
)
0.6
"Bevacizumab combined with biweekly XELIRI is a highly active first-line regimen for mCRC treatment, showing encouraging PFS, ORR and OS with a good tolerability."( Bevacizumab in combination with biweekly capecitabine and irinotecan, as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Alvarez-Suarez, S; García-Alfonso, P; Jerez-Gilarranz, Y; Khosravi, P; Martin, M; Muñoz-Martin, AJ; Riesco-Martinez, M, 2010
)
0.6
" We investigated the anti-tumor effects of CG2 (an HDACI) in combination with irinotecan, 5-FU, or oxaliplatin."( Effects of the HDAC inhibitor CG2 in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, or oxaliplatin on HCT116 colon cancer cells and xenografts.
Cho, DH; Hong, YS; Jin, DH; Jung, KA; Kim, JC; Kim, SM; Kim, TW; Lee, JS; Na, YS; Ro, S; Ryu, MH; Yang, SJ, 2010
)
0.84
" We conducted this study to investigate its efficacy and safety when combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors."( Efficacy and safety of endostar combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Huang, XE; Jiang, Y; Li, Y; Xiang, J; Yan, PW, 2010
)
0.36
"5 mg/m2 /day as an intravenous infusion for more than 7 days, in combination with chemotherapy."( Efficacy and safety of endostar combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Huang, XE; Jiang, Y; Li, Y; Xiang, J; Yan, PW, 2010
)
0.36
"Our study revealed that toxicity of Endostar combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of solid tumors was tolerable with moderate efficacy."( Efficacy and safety of endostar combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Huang, XE; Jiang, Y; Li, Y; Xiang, J; Yan, PW, 2010
)
0.36
"To study the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) and unclear K-ras status."( [Efficacy of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer and unclear K-ras status].
Guo, GF; Jiang, WQ; Qiu, HJ; Wang, F; Xia, LP; Xu, RH; Zhang, B; Zhou, FF, 2010
)
0.36
"Clinical data of 102 ACRC patients, treated by cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in Sun Yat-sen Cancer Center from March 2005 to December 2008, were collected."( [Efficacy of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer and unclear K-ras status].
Guo, GF; Jiang, WQ; Qiu, HJ; Wang, F; Xia, LP; Xu, RH; Zhang, B; Zhou, FF, 2010
)
0.36
"Patients with advanced colorectal cancer and unclear K-ras treated by cetuximab combined with chemotherapy have good ORR and OS, and the regimen is safe with less adverse events for them."( [Efficacy of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer and unclear K-ras status].
Guo, GF; Jiang, WQ; Qiu, HJ; Wang, F; Xia, LP; Xu, RH; Zhang, B; Zhou, FF, 2010
)
0.36
"To compare clinical efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin with those of oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Hou, SH; Li, YP; Liang, XB; Wang, LC; Yang, J; Zhang, X, 2010
)
2.06
"Literature search was performed by keywords "irinotecan", "oxaliplatin" and "colorectal cancer" on all randomized controlled trails reported on irinotecan versus oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer in MEDLINE, OVID, Springer, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) and CBMdisc (Chinese Biology and Medicine disc) before January 2010."( Irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Hou, SH; Li, YP; Liang, XB; Wang, LC; Yang, J; Zhang, X, 2010
)
2.06
"Both irinotecan and oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin were effective in the first-line therapy of advanced colorectal cancer."( Irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Hou, SH; Li, YP; Liang, XB; Wang, LC; Yang, J; Zhang, X, 2010
)
2.32
"We conducted a Phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of CKD-732 [6-O-(4-dimethylaminoethoxy) cinnamoyl fumagillol hemioxalate] in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in nine metastatic colorectal cancer patients who had progressed on irinotecan-based chemotherapy."( A Phase Ib pharmacokinetic study of the anti-angiogenic agent CKD-732 used in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who progressed on irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
Ahn, JB; Chung, HC; Hong, YS; Kim, C; Kim, DH; Kim, HR; Kim, TW; Lee, YJ; Park, KS; Rha, SY; Roh, JK; Shin, SJ, 2012
)
0.74
" The maximum tolerated dose was 10 mg/m(2)/d, and the clinically recommended dose was 5 mg/m(2)/d for CKD-732 in combination with XELOX."( A Phase Ib pharmacokinetic study of the anti-angiogenic agent CKD-732 used in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who progressed on irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
Ahn, JB; Chung, HC; Hong, YS; Kim, C; Kim, DH; Kim, HR; Kim, TW; Lee, YJ; Park, KS; Rha, SY; Roh, JK; Shin, SJ, 2012
)
0.57
"The Phase II recommended dose of CKD-732 was determined to be 5 mg/m(2)/d, and this dose was safely combined with a conventional dose of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in this patient population."( A Phase Ib pharmacokinetic study of the anti-angiogenic agent CKD-732 used in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who progressed on irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
Ahn, JB; Chung, HC; Hong, YS; Kim, C; Kim, DH; Kim, HR; Kim, TW; Lee, YJ; Park, KS; Rha, SY; Roh, JK; Shin, SJ, 2012
)
0.57
" We examined the efficacy of metronomic irinotecan combined with low-intensity ultrasound (US) in human uterine sarcoma and evaluated its antiangiogenesis mechanism by measuring the circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEP), a surrogate marker of angiogenesis."( Metronomic irinotecan chemotherapy combined with ultrasound irradiation for a human uterine sarcoma xenograft.
Choijamts, B; Emoto, M; Kawarabayashi, T; Miyamoto, S; Naganuma, Y; Nakajima, K; Tachibana, K, 2011
)
1.03
" Neither were there significant differences in the absolute nadir and percentage decrease of WBC and ANC, nor on the incidence and severity of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting when irinotecan was combined with omeprazole."( Effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and toxicities of irinotecan in cancer patients: a prospective cross-over drug-drug interaction study.
de Bruijn, P; de Jong, FA; Konings, IR; Lam, MH; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; van der Bol, JM; van Meerten, E; Verweij, J; Wiemer, EA, 2011
)
0.8
"To demonstrate the antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic activity of the novel pyrazolopyrimidine derivative multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor CLM3, alone and in combination with SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan), on endothelial and tumor cells and to show its mechanism of action."( Antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of CLM3, a novel multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, alone and in combination with SN-38 on endothelial and cancer cells.
Antonelli, A; Berti, P; Bocci, G; Canu, B; Cosconati, S; Da Settimo, F; Danesi, R; Di Desidero, T; Fioravanti, A; Frati, R; La Motta, C; Miccoli, P; Mugnaini, L; Orlandi, P; Sartini, S, 2011
)
0.56
"Proliferation and apoptotic assays were performed on microvascular endothelial (HMVEC-d) and lung (A549) and thyroid cancer (8305C, TT) cell lines exposed to CLM3 and to the simultaneous combination with SN38 for 72h."( Antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of CLM3, a novel multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, alone and in combination with SN-38 on endothelial and cancer cells.
Antonelli, A; Berti, P; Bocci, G; Canu, B; Cosconati, S; Da Settimo, F; Danesi, R; Di Desidero, T; Fioravanti, A; Frati, R; La Motta, C; Miccoli, P; Mugnaini, L; Orlandi, P; Sartini, S, 2011
)
0.37
"The pyrazolopyrimidine derivative CLM3 demonstrated a highly significant and promising antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity, alone and in combination with SN-38, for activated endothelial and cancer cells."( Antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of CLM3, a novel multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor, alone and in combination with SN-38 on endothelial and cancer cells.
Antonelli, A; Berti, P; Bocci, G; Canu, B; Cosconati, S; Da Settimo, F; Danesi, R; Di Desidero, T; Fioravanti, A; Frati, R; La Motta, C; Miccoli, P; Mugnaini, L; Orlandi, P; Sartini, S, 2011
)
0.37
" Treatment regimen: irinotecan (80 mg/m²) as 1-h infusion followed by 5-FU (2000 mg/m²) combined with FA (500 mg/m²) as 24-h infusion (d1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, qd 57)."( Palliative first-line therapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil and sodium folinic acid as a 24-hour infusion (AIO regimen) combined with weekly irinotecan in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction followed b
Albrecht, H; Boxberger, F; Busse, D; Golcher, H; Hahn, EG; Hohenberger, W; Janka, R; Konturek, PC; Koucky, K; Männlein, G; Neurath, MF; Ostermeier, N; Reulbach, U; Schildberg, C; Siebler, J; Wein, A; Wolff, K, 2011
)
0.89
"Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had progressed on therapy with 5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan in the first and second line setting and on the combination of irinotecan and cetuximab in third line setting independent of their KRAS mutation status, were treated with irinotecan and cetuximab combined with bevacizumab in a dosage of 5 mg/kg."( Bevacizumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan after failure of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bjerregaard, JK; Fromm, AL; Hoegdall, E; Jensen, BV; Jørgensen, TL; Larsen, FO; Nielsen, D; Pfeiffer, P; Qvortrup, C; Skougaard, K; Vistisen, K, 2011
)
0.84
" Three courses of chemotherapy combined with irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) and cisplatin (CDDP)(CPT-P) remarkably reduced the volume of the primary tumor and disseminated foci."( [Successful optimal debulking surgery following chemotherapy combined with irinotecan hydrochloride and cisplatin for advanced clear cell carcinoma of the ovary].
Futagami, M; Hakamada, K; Hirakawa, H; Mizunuma, H; Yokoyama, Y, 2011
)
0.86
"To observe and compare the response rate and toxicity of irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer."( [Comparison between the effects of irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer].
Chen, DY; Qi, Q; Zhao, WY, 2011
)
0.89
"The therapeutic effects of irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer are good and comparable, and their toxicities are tolerable."( [Comparison between the effects of irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer].
Chen, DY; Qi, Q; Zhao, WY, 2011
)
0.94
"To test the hypothesis that co-delivery of synergistic drug combinations in the same liposome provides a better anti-tumor effect than the drugs administered in separate liposomes, fluoroorotic acid (FOA) alone and in combination with irinotecan (IRN) were encapsulated in liposomes and evaluated for their anti-tumor activity in the C26 colon carcinoma mouse model."( Anti-tumor activity of liposome encapsulated fluoroorotic acid as a single agent and in combination with liposome irinotecan.
Jerger, K; Kieler-Ferguson, HM; Riviere, K; Szoka, FC, 2011
)
0.76
"The most commonly used schedules are 5-FU in combination with CDDP with or without epirubicin (ECF) or docetaxel (TCF) in treatment of MGA patients (pts), independently of HER status."( Efficacy of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (MGA) treatment.
Abbas, F; Adenis, A; Afchain, P; Aparicio, T; Bécouarn, Y; Bouché, O; Desseigne, F; Dorval, E; Edeline, J; Guimbaud, R; Kramar, A; Mitry, E; Romano, O; Samalin, E; Thézenas, S; Ychou, M, 2011
)
0.75
"To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mitomycin-C (MMC) in combination with fluoropyrimidines as salvage 3rd -or 4th-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients."( Mitomycin-C in combination with fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after oxaliplatin and irinotecan failure.
Alkis, N; Benekli, M; Demirci, U; Gumus, M; Isikdogan, A; Kaplan, MA; Koca, D; Ozdemir, NY; Sevinc, A; Uncu, D; Unek, T; Yetisyigit, T; Yilmaz, U,
)
0.34
"MMC in combination with fluoropyrimidines is safe and active in heavily-pretreated MCRC patients."( Mitomycin-C in combination with fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after oxaliplatin and irinotecan failure.
Alkis, N; Benekli, M; Demirci, U; Gumus, M; Isikdogan, A; Kaplan, MA; Koca, D; Ozdemir, NY; Sevinc, A; Uncu, D; Unek, T; Yetisyigit, T; Yilmaz, U,
)
0.34
" Vorinostat was combined with bevacizumab and CPT-11 and was escalated using a standard 3 + 3 design."( Phase I trial of vorinostat combined with bevacizumab and CPT-11 in recurrent glioblastoma.
Brem, S; Chinnaiyan, P; Chowdhary, S; Kahali, S; Murtagh, R; Pan, E; Potthast, L; Prabhu, A; Rojiani, A; Sarcar, B; Tsai, YY; Yu, HM, 2012
)
0.38
" Possible further antitumor efficacy of lower-dose and longer-term CPT-11 combined with simultaneous low-dose celecoxib was investigated for chemosensitive TNB9 and multi-drug resistant TS-N-2nu neuroblastoma xenografts."( Enhanced antitumor effect of lower-dose and longer-term CPT-11 treatment in combination with low-dose celecoxib against neuroblastoma xenografts.
Fukushima, T; Kaneko, M; Kaneko, S, 2013
)
0.39
"Our findings demonstrate that lower-dose and longer-term CPT-11 treatment in combination with simultaneous low-dose celecoxib enhances antitumor activity and can successfully eradicate most of the neuroblastoma xenografts."( Enhanced antitumor effect of lower-dose and longer-term CPT-11 treatment in combination with low-dose celecoxib against neuroblastoma xenografts.
Fukushima, T; Kaneko, M; Kaneko, S, 2013
)
0.39
"The efficacy of bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as the second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been fully clarified, although bevacizumab combined with infusional 5-FU/LV plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in the second-line setting has demonstrated a survival benefit."( Bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were previously treated with oxaliplatin-containing regimens: a multicenter observational cohort study (TCTG 2nd-BV stud
Baba, E; Bando, H; Boku, N; Esaki, T; Fukunaga, M; Hyodo, I; Kato, S; Katsumata, K; Miyake, Y; Moriwaki, T; Ozeki, M; Satoh, T; Takashima, A; Yamashita, K; Yamazaki, K; Yoshida, S, 2012
)
0.88
" We investigated the antitumor effect and mechanism of synergism when indisulam was administered in combination with CPT-11."( Therapeutic potential and molecular mechanism of a novel sulfonamide anticancer drug, indisulam (E7070) in combination with CPT-11 for cancer treatment.
Asada, M; Kusano, K; Owa, T; Ozawa, Y; Yokoi, A; Yoshimatsu, K, 2012
)
0.38
"Cetuximab combined with irinotecan when administered biweekly is safe and effective for treatment of pretreated elderly patients with mCRC."( Anti-EGFR (cetuximab) combined with irinotecan for treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Abdel-Aziz, H; Abdelwahab, S; Azmy, A; Mahmoud, A; Salim, H, 2012
)
0.96
"The hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) influence the pharmacokinetics of several drug classes and are involved in many clinical drug-drug interactions."( Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
Artursson, P; Haglund, U; Karlgren, M; Kimoto, E; Lai, Y; Norinder, U; Vildhede, A; Wisniewski, JR, 2012
)
0.38
" Firstly, viability, apoptosis and caspase assays were performed during incubation with either the inhibitors alone or combined with different cytotoxic agents."( Selective PI3K inhibition by BKM120 and BEZ235 alone or in combination with chemotherapy in wild-type and mutated human gastrointestinal cancer cell lines.
Bachmann, E; Galle, PR; Khillimberger, K; Linnig, M; Moehler, M; Mueller, A; Schimanski, CC, 2012
)
0.38
" Furthermore, BEZ235 caused synergistic induction of apoptosis when combined with irinotecan in colon cancer cell lines."( Selective PI3K inhibition by BKM120 and BEZ235 alone or in combination with chemotherapy in wild-type and mutated human gastrointestinal cancer cell lines.
Bachmann, E; Galle, PR; Khillimberger, K; Linnig, M; Moehler, M; Mueller, A; Schimanski, CC, 2012
)
0.6
"Leucovorin Sodium (LV/Na) has a high solubility, and is stable when given with continuous infusion of 5-FU."( A phase II randomized study of combined infusional leucovorin sodium and 5- FU versus the leucovorin calcium followed by 5-FU both in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bleiberg, H; D'Haens, G; Deleu, I; Efira, A; Humblet, Y; Paesmans, M; Peeters, M; Rezaei Kalantari, H; Vandebroek, A; Vergauwe, P, 2012
)
0.58
"Fifty seven patients with mCRC and no previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomized to receive LV/Na or LV/Ca with irinotecan or oxaliplatine combined with infusional 5-FU."( A phase II randomized study of combined infusional leucovorin sodium and 5- FU versus the leucovorin calcium followed by 5-FU both in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bleiberg, H; D'Haens, G; Deleu, I; Efira, A; Humblet, Y; Paesmans, M; Peeters, M; Rezaei Kalantari, H; Vandebroek, A; Vergauwe, P, 2012
)
0.78
" Recently, fluorouracil/leucovorin combined with irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) demonstrated their superiority in first-line therapy."( Influcence of localization of primary tumor on effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin combined with irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study.
Chauffert, B; Gentil, J; Ghiringhelli, F; Lorgis, V, 2012
)
0.85
" The present study evaluated the synergetic toxicity of DATR in combination with traditional chemotherapeutics, including irinotecan, polyene paclitaxel and oxaliplatin in rats."( Synergetic toxicity of DATR, a recombinant soluble human TRAIL mutant, in combination with traditional chemotherapeutics in rats.
Chu, Z; Huang, M; Lu, G; Mao, Y; Yuan, B; Zhang, X; Zou, Y, 2012
)
0.59
" Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab compared to bevacizumab combined with irinotecan for the treatment of recurrent GBM."( A meta-analysis of bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.
Huang, S; Wang, Z; Zhang, G, 2012
)
0.83
" Thus, we investigated the effect of JMR-132 in combination with S-phase-specific cytotoxic agents, 5-FU, irinotecan and cisplatin on the in vitro and in vivo growth of HT-29, HCT-116 and HCT-15 human colon cancer cell lines."( GHRH antagonist when combined with cytotoxic agents induces S-phase arrest and additive growth inhibition of human colon cancer.
Block, NL; Buchholz, S; Datz, C; Hohla, F; Krishan, A; Rick, FG; Schally, AV; Seitz, S; Stadlmayr, A; Szalontay, L, 2012
)
0.59
"This prospective observational study assessed the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as preoperative treatment to downsize tumours for radical resection in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Preoperative treatment with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Albiol, M; Alsina, M; Codina-Barreras, A; Figueras, J; Guardeño, R; Hernandez-Yagüe, X; Lopez-Ben, S; Queralt, B; Soriano, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Preoperative treatment consisted of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) combined with oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy, which was followed by surgery in patients showing clinical benefit."( Preoperative treatment with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Albiol, M; Alsina, M; Codina-Barreras, A; Figueras, J; Guardeño, R; Hernandez-Yagüe, X; Lopez-Ben, S; Queralt, B; Soriano, J, 2013
)
0.61
"We retrospectively assessed the safety and efficacy of BEV alone or combined with irinotecan in 39 patients with recurrent grade II/III gliomas."( Bevacizumab alone or in combination with irinotecan in recurrent WHO grade II and grade III gliomas.
Happold, C; Hundsberger, T; Seystahl, K; Weller, M; Wick, A; Wick, W; Wiestler, B, 2013
)
0.88
"Both BEV monotherapy and its combination with irinotecan were well tolerated."( Bevacizumab alone or in combination with irinotecan in recurrent WHO grade II and grade III gliomas.
Happold, C; Hundsberger, T; Seystahl, K; Weller, M; Wick, A; Wick, W; Wiestler, B, 2013
)
0.91
"The aims of this study were to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin in combination with fixed doses of gemcitabine, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (G-FLIE) in solid tumors, including advanced pancreatic cancer, and to evaluate the toxicity of the regimen."( Phase I study of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (G-FLIE) in patients with metastatic solid tumors including adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
Chalasani, SB; Chung, MS; Grossbard, ML; Kozuch, PS; Malamud, S; Mirzoyev, T; Olszewski, AJ, 2013
)
0.83
" The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of BV combined with irinotecan plus S-1, and to observe the safety and efficacy of this regimen as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Phase I study of bevacizumab combined with irinotecan and S-1 as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Akashi, K; Arita, S; Baba, E; Esaki, T; Kishimoto, J; Kumagai, H; Kusaba, H; Mitsugi, K; Uchino, K, 2013
)
0.86
" UCN-01, a non-selective Chk1 inhibitor, combined with irinotecan demonstrated activity in advanced TNBC in our Phase I study."( A phase II study of UCN-01 in combination with irinotecan in patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer.
Bernard, PS; Brenin, CM; Cai, SR; Craig Lockhart, A; Creekmore, AN; Dancey, J; Doyle, LA; Ebbert, M; Ellis, MJ; Fracasso, PM; Guo, Z; Ma, CX; Mwandoro, T; Naughton, MJ; Petroni, GR; Picus, J; Piwnica-Worms, H; Pluard, TJ; Reed, J; Ryan, CE; Watson, M; Yarde, ER, 2013
)
0.89
" We evaluated the efficacy and safety of conatumumab (an agonistic monoclonal antibody against human death receptor 5) and ganitumab (a monoclonal antibody against the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor) combined with standard FOLFIRI chemotherapy as a second-line treatment in patients with mutant KRAS mCRC."( A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab or conatumumab in combination with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment of mutant KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Choo, SP; Chuah, BYS; Cohn, AL; Cottrell, S; Dubey, S; Galimi, F; Hei, YJ; Kopp, MV; Loberg, R; Maurel, J; McCaffery, I; Mitchell, EP; Nowara, E; Pan, Y; Sakaeva, DD; Sastre, J; Suzuki, S; Tabernero, J, 2013
)
0.39
"Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are currently evaluated in clinical trials in combination with topoisomerase I (Top1) inhibitors against a variety of cancers, including colon carcinoma."( Influence of MLH1 on colon cancer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor combined with irinotecan.
Campolo, F; Dolci, S; Dorio, AS; Graziani, G; Lacal, PM; Leonetti, C; Muzi, A; Porru, M; Praz, F; Tentori, L; Vernole, P, 2013
)
0.61
" CPT-11 treatment alone or combined with blocking monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against co-stimulatory molecules (LFA-1 and CD154) was evaluated in the prevention of heart transplant rejection in alloantigen-primed mice."( Irinotecan combined with co-stimulatory molecule blockade prolongs survival of cardiac allografts in alloantigen-primed mice.
Chen, J; Chen, Z; Cheng, P; He, Z; Liu, Z; Qi, Z; Yang, R; Zhang, S, 2013
)
1.83
" This pilot study demonstrates the utility of using yeast for screening large matrices of drug combinations, and it provides a means to prioritize drug combination tests in human cells."( A high-throughput yeast assay identifies synergistic drug combinations.
Brown, GW; Giaever, G; Lee, AY; Nislow, C; Torres, NP, 2013
)
0.39
"The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions of MK-0646 in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan were investigated in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer."( Phase 1 pharmacokinetic study of MK-0646 (dalotuzumab), an anti-insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor monoclonal antibody, in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Doi, T; Feng, HP; Fuse, N; Muro, K; Noguchi, K; Ohtsu, A; Shimamoto, T; Takahari, D; Ura, T; Yoshino, T, 2013
)
0.8
" Therefore we evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan in combination with nedaplatin/cisplatin against refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer."( [A retrospective study of the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan in combination with nedaplatin versus irinotecan in combination with cisplatin as salvage
treatment in refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer].
Hao, X; Hu, X; Li, J; Shi, Y; Wang, H; Wang, Y; Xu, J; Yu, S; Zhang, X, 2013
)
0.89
"The antiangiogenic agent aflibercept (ziv-aflibercept in the United States) in combination with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved survival in a phase III study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen."( Aflibercept versus placebo in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan in the treatment of previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: prespecified subgroup analyses from the VELOUR trial.
Allegra, CJ; Chevalier, S; Ferry, DR; Lakomý, R; McKendrick, JJ; Moiseyenko, VM; Prausová, J; Ruff, P; Soussan-Lazard, K; Tabernero, J; Van Cutsem, E; van Hazel, GA, 2014
)
0.84
"The benefits of aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin were maintained across the specified patient subgroups, including in patients with or without prior bevacizumab treatment."( Aflibercept versus placebo in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan in the treatment of previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: prespecified subgroup analyses from the VELOUR trial.
Allegra, CJ; Chevalier, S; Ferry, DR; Lakomý, R; McKendrick, JJ; Moiseyenko, VM; Prausová, J; Ruff, P; Soussan-Lazard, K; Tabernero, J; Van Cutsem, E; van Hazel, GA, 2014
)
0.63
"This phase I study evaluated the safety of SU5416, a potent and selective inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase Flk-1, in combination with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors."( A phase I dose escalation and pharmacodynamic study of SU5416 (semaxanib) combined with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Bekaii-Saab, T; Clinton, SK; Grever, MR; Kraut, EH; Martin, LK; Monk, P; Serna, D, 2013
)
0.79
"SU5416 at 65 mg/m² twice weekly combined with cisplatin and irinotecan weekly for 4 of 6 weeks is well tolerated but without evidence of clinical activity."( A phase I dose escalation and pharmacodynamic study of SU5416 (semaxanib) combined with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Bekaii-Saab, T; Clinton, SK; Grever, MR; Kraut, EH; Martin, LK; Monk, P; Serna, D, 2013
)
0.84
"To determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan administered every 2 weeks, in combination with a fixed and continuous administration of temozolomide, in patients with glioblastoma at first relapse."( A phase I study of irinotecan in combination with metronomic temozolomide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.
Balañá, C; Gallego, O; García, JL; Iglesias, L; Pérez, P; Reynés, G, 2014
)
0.99
"We conclude that bortezomib is not effective for the treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the GEJ or stomach, whether used alone or in combination with irinotecan, in an unselected patient population."( Phase II trial of bortezomib alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or stomach.
Besanceney-Webler, C; Chen, EX; Cheng, J; Christos, P; Dilts, KT; Holloway, S; Keresztes, R; Lane, ME; Lin, J; Matulich, D; Ocean, AJ; Papetti, M; Schnoll-Sussman, F; Shah, MA; Sparano, JA; Ward, M; Wright, JJ; Xiang, J; Yantiss, RK, 2014
)
0.84
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment for HER-2-positive chemo-refractory advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma."( [Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive chemo-refractory advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma].
Cao, Y; Gong, J; Li, J; Li, Y; Lu, M; Lu, Z; Shen, L; Wang, X; Wu, Y; Zhang, X; Zhou, J, 2014
)
0.4
"A dose escalation study of biweekly irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with capecitabine was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes."( A phase I study of capecitabine combined with CPT-11 in metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.
Inaba, T; Ishida, K; Kashiwaba, M; Kawagishi, R; Komatsu, H; Matsui, Y; Sugai, T; Uesugi, N; Wakabayashi, G, 2014
)
0.68
" The aim of the present study was to explore whether CFZ alone or in combination with CPT-11 is effective in CRC treatment."( Enhanced anti-colorectal cancer effects of carfilzomib combined with CPT-11 via downregulation of nuclear factor-κB in vitro and in vivo.
Chen, Q; Chen, S; Huang, C; Li, J; Liao, J; Liu, F; Su, G; Tang, W; Ye, Y, 2014
)
0.4
" This study aimed to evaluate the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR), safety, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in adult patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( A phase I open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab for relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bennouna, J; Botbyl, J; de Labareyre, C; Delord, JP; Deslandres, M; Ruiz-Soto, R; Senellart, H; Suttle, AB; Wixon, C, 2015
)
0.83
"This was a Phase I, 3 + 3 design, open-label, dose-escalation study (NCT0050943; VEG108925) conducted in sequential cohorts to determine the MTR of pazopanib and irinotecan administered with cetuximab."( A phase I open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab for relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bennouna, J; Botbyl, J; de Labareyre, C; Delord, JP; Deslandres, M; Ruiz-Soto, R; Senellart, H; Suttle, AB; Wixon, C, 2015
)
0.83
"The MTR was determined to be 400 mg pazopanib per day orally in combination with 150 mg/m(2) irinotecan biweekly and 250 mg/m(2) cetuximab weekly by infusion."( A phase I open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab for relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bennouna, J; Botbyl, J; de Labareyre, C; Delord, JP; Deslandres, M; Ruiz-Soto, R; Senellart, H; Suttle, AB; Wixon, C, 2015
)
0.85
" This trial was designed to assess the tolerability of different doses of abituzumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan (phase I) and explore the efficacy and tolerability of the combination versus that of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) (phase II part)."( Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial.
Bokemeyer, C; Bruns, R; Csőszi, T; Élez, E; Höhler, T; Kocáková, I; Martens, UM; Melichar, B; Orlova, R; Quaratino, S; Rivera, F; Smakal, M; Straub, J; Tabernero, J; Tjulandin, S; Topuzov, E; Van Cutsem, E, 2015
)
0.89
" The trial comprised an initial safety run-in using abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg combined with a standard of care (SoC: cetuximab plus irinotecan) and a phase II part in which patients were randomised 1 : 1 : 1 to receive abituzumab 500 mg (arm A) or 1000 mg (arm B) every 2 weeks combined with SoC, or SoC alone (arm C)."( Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial.
Bokemeyer, C; Bruns, R; Csőszi, T; Élez, E; Höhler, T; Kocáková, I; Martens, UM; Melichar, B; Orlova, R; Quaratino, S; Rivera, F; Smakal, M; Straub, J; Tabernero, J; Tjulandin, S; Topuzov, E; Van Cutsem, E, 2015
)
0.89
"Phase I showed that abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg were well tolerated in combination with SoC."( Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial.
Bokemeyer, C; Bruns, R; Csőszi, T; Élez, E; Höhler, T; Kocáková, I; Martens, UM; Melichar, B; Orlova, R; Quaratino, S; Rivera, F; Smakal, M; Straub, J; Tabernero, J; Tjulandin, S; Topuzov, E; Van Cutsem, E, 2015
)
0.68
" The tolerability of abituzumab combined with cetuximab and irinotecan was acceptable."( Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial.
Bokemeyer, C; Bruns, R; Csőszi, T; Élez, E; Höhler, T; Kocáková, I; Martens, UM; Melichar, B; Orlova, R; Quaratino, S; Rivera, F; Smakal, M; Straub, J; Tabernero, J; Tjulandin, S; Topuzov, E; Van Cutsem, E, 2015
)
0.93
"These findings suggest the potential roles of HM781-36B as the treatment for EGFR-overexpressing colon cancer, singly or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents."( Antitumor Activity of HM781-36B, alone or in Combination with Chemotherapeutic Agents, in Colorectal Cancer Cells.
Kang, MH; Kim, JH; Kim, JW; Lee, HS; Lee, JS; Lee, KW; Moon, SU; Sung, JH, 2016
)
0.43
"The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a single administration of dexamethasone (DEX) on day 1 against DEX administration on days 1-3 in combination with palonosetron (PALO), a second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in non-anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) moderately-emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC)."( Open-label, randomized, comparative, phase III study on effects of reducing steroid use in combination with Palonosetron.
Eto, K; Fukushima, H; Furuhata, T; Isobe, H; Iwanaga, I; Kawamoto, Y; Komatsu, Y; Kudo, M; Masuko, H; Minami, S; Miyagishima, T; Nakajima, J; Nakamura, M; Oba, K; Ohsaki, Y; Okita, K; Sasaki, K; Shibuya, H; Takahashi, Y; Tateyama, M; Yokoyama, R; Yuki, S, 2015
)
0.42
"To explore the clinical efficacy and toxic and side effects of recombinant human endostatin (rh- endostatin/endostar) combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer."( Clinical observation on recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced gastrointestinal cancer.
Gao, SR; Li, LM; Wang, AR; Wang, GM; Xia, HP; Xu, HY, 2015
)
0.42
"Preliminary observations show that endostar (once every other day) combined with chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal cancer, with low toxic effects, good tolerance, deserving further study."( Clinical observation on recombinant human endostatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced gastrointestinal cancer.
Gao, SR; Li, LM; Wang, AR; Wang, GM; Xia, HP; Xu, HY, 2015
)
0.42
" This novel siRNA based drug was studied, in combination with chemotherapy, as targeted therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC)."( RNAi therapy targeting KRAS in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients.
Dancour, A; David, EB; Domb, A; Eliakim, R; Gabai, RM; Galun, E; Golan, T; Goldes, Y; Goldin, E; Harari, G; Hen, N; Hubert, A; Khvalevsky, EZ; Kopleman, Y; Lahav, M; Raskin, S; Segal, A; Shemi, A, 2015
)
0.42
"We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to evaluate the feasibility, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dose (RD) of weekly irinotecan combined with fixed-dose carboplatin for patients with untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)."( Weekly irinotecan combined with carboplatin for patients with small-cell lung cancer: A phase I study.
Inoue, A; Ishimoto, O; Maemondo, M; Nukiwa, T; Sugawara, S, 2015
)
1.07
" The remission rate, control rate and time to disease progression were compared among patients receiving cetuximab combined with different chemotherapy regimens in different periods."( [Clinical efficacy observation of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma].
Bai, L; Han, C; Jiao, S; Li, J; Su, D; Wang, Y; Zhang, T, 2015
)
0.42
"Cetuximab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is recommended as the first-line application in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients, because it is helpful to improve the rate of disease control."( [Clinical efficacy observation of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma].
Bai, L; Han, C; Jiao, S; Li, J; Su, D; Wang, Y; Zhang, T, 2015
)
0.42
"5mg/kg every alternate week (arm B), or placebo (arm C) in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan."( A Randomized Phase II/III Study of Dalotuzumab in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Chemorefractory, KRAS Wild-Type, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Ayers, M; Clarke, SJ; Cunningham, D; Ferry, D; Frödin, JE; Guren, TK; Hawkes, E; Kim, SY; Kim, TW; Kim, TY; Loboda, A; Mauro, DJ; Nebozhyn, M; Park, YS; Peckitt, C; Roh, JK; Schmoll, HJ; Sclafani, F; Tabernero, J; Watkins, DJ, 2015
)
0.86
"The oral Bcl-2 inhibitor navitoclax demonstrated activity in solid and hematologic malignancies as monotherapy and in combination with other cytotoxic agents in preclinical and early clinical studies."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of navitoclax (ABT-263) in combination with irinotecan: results of an open-label, phase 1 study.
Arzt, J; Busman, TA; Holen, KD; Lian, G; LoRusso, P; Rosen, LS; Rudersdorf, NS; Tolcher, AW; Vanderwal, CA; Waring, JF; Yang, J, 2015
)
0.64
"In this multicenter, open-label, phase 1 dose escalation study, adults with advanced solid tumors received navitoclax (starting dose 150 mg/day) in combination with 1 of 2 irinotecan schedules during a 21-day cycle: a once-every-3-week regimen (Q3W 180, 250, or 350 mg/m(2)) or a once-weekly regimen (QW 75 or 100 mg/m(2))."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of navitoclax (ABT-263) in combination with irinotecan: results of an open-label, phase 1 study.
Arzt, J; Busman, TA; Holen, KD; Lian, G; LoRusso, P; Rosen, LS; Rudersdorf, NS; Tolcher, AW; Vanderwal, CA; Waring, JF; Yang, J, 2015
)
0.84
" In the QW group, the MTD and RPTD for navitoclax were 150 mg when combined with irinotecan 75 mg/m(2)."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of navitoclax (ABT-263) in combination with irinotecan: results of an open-label, phase 1 study.
Arzt, J; Busman, TA; Holen, KD; Lian, G; LoRusso, P; Rosen, LS; Rudersdorf, NS; Tolcher, AW; Vanderwal, CA; Waring, JF; Yang, J, 2015
)
0.87
"The RPTD of navitoclax in combination with irinotecan 75 mg/m(2) QW during a 21-day cycle was 150 mg in these heavily pretreated patients."( Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of navitoclax (ABT-263) in combination with irinotecan: results of an open-label, phase 1 study.
Arzt, J; Busman, TA; Holen, KD; Lian, G; LoRusso, P; Rosen, LS; Rudersdorf, NS; Tolcher, AW; Vanderwal, CA; Waring, JF; Yang, J, 2015
)
0.9
" Herein, we critically discuss the current data on the efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for first-line and maintenance treatment of metastatic CRC and briefly comment on existing controversies and future perspectives."( Bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan- or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for first-line and maintenance treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Grapsa, D; Saif, MW; Syrigos, K, 2015
)
0.67
" We investigated if arsenic sulfide (As4S4) in combination with other distinct agents could enhance its cytotoxic activity."( Arsenic sulfide combined with JQ1, chemotherapy agents, or celecoxib inhibit gastric and colon cancer cell growth.
Chen, S; Pan, M; Tong, Y; Zhang, L; Zhang, X, 2015
)
0.42
"We used gastric and colon cancer cell lines to study the synergistic effect of As4S4 in combination with BRD4 inhibitor JQ1, or with chemotherapy drug cisplatin and irinotecan or with COX2 inhibitor celecoxib."( Arsenic sulfide combined with JQ1, chemotherapy agents, or celecoxib inhibit gastric and colon cancer cell growth.
Chen, S; Pan, M; Tong, Y; Zhang, L; Zhang, X, 2015
)
0.61
"We found that when As4S4 was combined with JQ1, cisplatin, irinotecan or celecoxib, its cytotoxic activity was dramatically enhanced in both gastric and colon cancer cell lines."( Arsenic sulfide combined with JQ1, chemotherapy agents, or celecoxib inhibit gastric and colon cancer cell growth.
Chen, S; Pan, M; Tong, Y; Zhang, L; Zhang, X, 2015
)
0.66
"As4S4 in combination with JQ1, cisplatin, irinotecan or celecoxib showed enhanced cytotoxic effect on gastric and colon cancer cells, indicating the potential application of these novel drug combinations as part of treatment strategy that warrants further investigation."( Arsenic sulfide combined with JQ1, chemotherapy agents, or celecoxib inhibit gastric and colon cancer cell growth.
Chen, S; Pan, M; Tong, Y; Zhang, L; Zhang, X, 2015
)
0.68
"To investigate the anticancer effect and its mechanism of SN-38 combined with sorafenib on hepatocellular cancer cell lines HepG-2 and BEL-7402."( [Anticancer effect of SN-38 combined with sorafenib on hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and its mechanism].
Jian, C; Pei-hua, L; Xiao-chun, Y; Xu, L; Yuan-run, Z, 2015
)
0.42
"SRB colorimetry showed the synergistic anticancer activities of SN-38 combined with sorafenib, with a combination index of <0."( [Anticancer effect of SN-38 combined with sorafenib on hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and its mechanism].
Jian, C; Pei-hua, L; Xiao-chun, Y; Xu, L; Yuan-run, Z, 2015
)
0.42
"High-dose FOLFIRI combined with cetuximab yielded high response rates and enabled complete resection of class II hepatic metastases in most patients."( High Resectability Rate of Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases After UGT1A1-Adapted High-Dose Irinotecan Combined with LV5FU2 and Cetuximab: A Multicenter Phase II Study (ERBIFORT).
Buc, E; Chatelut, E; De la Fouchardière, C; Mendoza, C; Mineur, L; Pezet, D; Phelip, JM; Quesada, JL; Rivoire, M; Roblin, X, 2016
)
0.65
" This phase I study determined the MTD, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of veliparib, an orally bioavailable PARP1/2 inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan."( Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Veliparib (ABT-888) in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.
Bell, T; Boerner, JL; Boerner, SA; Bowditch, A; Burger, A; Cai, D; Chen, AP; Cleary, JM; Ferry-Galow, K; Heilbrun, LK; Ji, J; Kinders, RJ; Li, J; LoRusso, PM; Marrero, AM; Parchment, RE; Pilat, MJ; Rubinstein, L; Sausville, EA; Shapiro, GI; Smith, D; Tolaney, SM; Wolanski, A; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
0.82
" The MTD was 100 mg/m(2) irinotecan (days 1 and 8) combined with veliparib 40 mg twice daily (days -1-14) on a 21-day cycle."( Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Veliparib (ABT-888) in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.
Bell, T; Boerner, JL; Boerner, SA; Bowditch, A; Burger, A; Cai, D; Chen, AP; Cleary, JM; Ferry-Galow, K; Heilbrun, LK; Ji, J; Kinders, RJ; Li, J; LoRusso, PM; Marrero, AM; Parchment, RE; Pilat, MJ; Rubinstein, L; Sausville, EA; Shapiro, GI; Smith, D; Tolaney, SM; Wolanski, A; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
0.94
"Veliparib can be safely combined with irinotecan at doses that inhibit PARP catalytic activity."( Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Veliparib (ABT-888) in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.
Bell, T; Boerner, JL; Boerner, SA; Bowditch, A; Burger, A; Cai, D; Chen, AP; Cleary, JM; Ferry-Galow, K; Heilbrun, LK; Ji, J; Kinders, RJ; Li, J; LoRusso, PM; Marrero, AM; Parchment, RE; Pilat, MJ; Rubinstein, L; Sausville, EA; Shapiro, GI; Smith, D; Tolaney, SM; Wolanski, A; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
0.9
"To compare the efficacy and safety of two chemotherapeutic regimens, irinotecan monotherapy or irinotecan in combination with fluoropyrimidines, for patients with advanced CRC when administered in the first or second-line settings."( Irinotecan chemotherapy combined with fluoropyrimidines versus irinotecan alone for overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer.
Repana, D; Van Hemelrijck, M; Wardhana, A; Watkins, J; Wulaningsih, W; Yoshuantari, N, 2016
)
2.11
"Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of IRI chemotherapy combined with fluoropyrimidine compared with IRI alone for the treatment of patients with advanced CRC, regardless of treatment line settings."( Irinotecan chemotherapy combined with fluoropyrimidines versus irinotecan alone for overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer.
Repana, D; Van Hemelrijck, M; Wardhana, A; Watkins, J; Wulaningsih, W; Yoshuantari, N, 2016
)
1.88
" Pharmacokinetic testing did not show evidence of drug-drug interaction between irinotecan and alisertib."( Phase I Study of the Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A NANT (New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy) Trial.
Bagatell, R; Courtier, J; Czarnecki, S; DuBois, SG; Fox, E; Goodarzian, F; Groshen, S; Hawkins, R; Kudgus, RA; Lai, H; Malvar, J; Marachelian, A; Maris, JM; Matthay, KK; Mosse, YP; Reid, JM; Shimada, H; Tsao-Wei, D; Wagner, L, 2016
)
0.89
"Cetuximab in combination with an irinotecan-containing regimen is a standard treatment in patients with KRAS wild-type (KRAS WT), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 study of tivantinib (ARQ 197) in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS who have received first-line systemic therapy.
Barni, S; Bendell, JC; Bessudo, A; Bolotin, E; Eng, C; Gladkov, O; Hart, LL; Hsu, C; Kopp, MV; Kotiv, B; Langdon, R; Müller, L; Schwartz, B; Severtsev, A; Vladimirov, V; von Roemeling, R, 2016
)
0.93
" We aimed to establish the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 oral dose of the CCR2 inhibitor PF-04136309 in combination with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (oxaliplatin and irinotecan plus leucovorin and fluorouracil)."( Targeting tumour-associated macrophages with CCR2 inhibition in combination with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-finding, non-randomised, phase 1b trial.
Belt, BA; Cusworth, BM; DeNardo, DG; Fields, RC; Fowler, KJ; Goedegebuure, SP; Hawkins, WG; Lim, KH; Linehan, DC; Lockhart, AC; Nieman, RK; Nywening, TM; Panni, RZ; Sanford, DE; Strasberg, SM; Suresh, R; Tan, BR; Toriola, AT; Wang-Gillam, A; Worley, LA; Yano, M, 2016
)
0.63
" Patients were allocated to receive either FOLFIRINOX alone (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), irinotecan 180 mg/m(2), leucovorin 400 mg/m(2), and bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2), followed by 2400 mg/m(2) 46-h continuous infusion), administered every 2 weeks for a total of six treatment cycles, or in combination with oral PF-04136309, administered at a starting dose of 500 mg twice daily in a standard 3 + 3 dose de-escalation design."( Targeting tumour-associated macrophages with CCR2 inhibition in combination with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-finding, non-randomised, phase 1b trial.
Belt, BA; Cusworth, BM; DeNardo, DG; Fields, RC; Fowler, KJ; Goedegebuure, SP; Hawkins, WG; Lim, KH; Linehan, DC; Lockhart, AC; Nieman, RK; Nywening, TM; Panni, RZ; Sanford, DE; Strasberg, SM; Suresh, R; Tan, BR; Toriola, AT; Wang-Gillam, A; Worley, LA; Yano, M, 2016
)
0.66
"CCR2-targeted therapy with PF-04136309 in combination with FOLFIRINOX is safe and tolerable."( Targeting tumour-associated macrophages with CCR2 inhibition in combination with FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-finding, non-randomised, phase 1b trial.
Belt, BA; Cusworth, BM; DeNardo, DG; Fields, RC; Fowler, KJ; Goedegebuure, SP; Hawkins, WG; Lim, KH; Linehan, DC; Lockhart, AC; Nieman, RK; Nywening, TM; Panni, RZ; Sanford, DE; Strasberg, SM; Suresh, R; Tan, BR; Toriola, AT; Wang-Gillam, A; Worley, LA; Yano, M, 2016
)
0.43
" We evaluated the ability of ceramide, a bioactive sphingolipid, to predict tumour sensitivity in patients treated by hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with irinotecan chemotherapy."( Plasma ceramide, a real-time predictive marker of pulmonary and hepatic metastases response to stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with irinotecan.
Campion, L; Carrie, C; Dubois, N; Ferchaud-Roucher, V; Gaugler, MH; Krempf, M; Mahé, M; Mirabel, X; Paris, F; Rio, E; Ripoche, N, 2016
)
0.82
"Total plasma ceramide is a promising biomarker of tumour response to SBRT combined with irinotecan that should enable to segregate patients with high risk of tumour escape."( Plasma ceramide, a real-time predictive marker of pulmonary and hepatic metastases response to stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with irinotecan.
Campion, L; Carrie, C; Dubois, N; Ferchaud-Roucher, V; Gaugler, MH; Krempf, M; Mahé, M; Mirabel, X; Paris, F; Rio, E; Ripoche, N, 2016
)
0.86
" We found that cetuximab, in combination with chemotherapy, fostered ICD in CRC cells, which we measured via the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response and an increase in phagocytosis by dendritic cells."( The EGFR-specific antibody cetuximab combined with chemotherapy triggers immunogenic cell death.
Bardelli, A; Bonaldi, T; Cancelliere, C; Conte, A; Cuomo, A; Di Fiore, PP; Magni, E; Penna, G; Pozzi, C; Ravenda, PS; Rescigno, M; Sigismund, S; Silvola, A; Spadoni, I; Zampino, MG, 2016
)
0.43
" An additive antiproliferative effect was observed in combination with irinotecan."( Modulation of tumor eIF4E by antisense inhibition: A phase I/II translational clinical trial of ISIS 183750-an antisense oligonucleotide against eIF4E-in combination with irinotecan in solid tumors and irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer.
Abdullah, S; Abi-Jaoudeh, N; Anderson, V; Duffy, AG; Figg, WD; Fioravanti, S; Greten, TF; Lee, S; Levy, E; MacLeod, AR; Makarova-Rusher, OV; Peer, CJ; Raffeld, M; Rahma, OE; Revenko, AS; Steinberg, SM; Tomita, Y; Trepel, JB; Ulahannan, SV; Walker, M; Wood, BJ, 2016
)
0.86
" It is unknown whether these antibodies, such as cetuximab, are more efficacious in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer as monotherapy, or in combination with irinotecan."( ICECREAM: randomised phase II study of cetuximab alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with either KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PI3KCA wild type, or G13D mutated tumours.
Chantrill, L; Ciardiello, F; Day, F; Desai, J; Elez, E; Gebski, V; Haydon, A; Jefford, M; Joubert, W; Karapetis, C; Khasraw, M; Nott, L; Pavlakis, N; Price, T; Segelov, E; Shapiro, J; Tebbutt, N; Tejpar, S; Thavaneswaran, S; Underhill, C; van Hazel, G; Waring, P; Wasan, H; Wilson, K, 2016
)
0.86
" We investigated the pharmacologic characteristics of OTX015 as a single agent and combined with targeted therapy or conventional chemotherapies in glioblastoma cell lines."( OTX015 (MK-8628), a novel BET inhibitor, displays in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects alone and in combination with conventional therapies in glioblastoma models.
Astorgues-Xerri, L; Bekradda, M; Berenguer-Daizé, C; Cayol, M; Cvitkovic, E; Lokiec, F; MacKenzie, S; Noel, K; Odore, E; Ouafik, L; Rezai, K; Riveiro, ME, 2016
)
0.43
" This study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) of HAI-FUDR in combination with modern systemic CT versus modern systemic CT alone in patients with IU-CRCLM."( Hepatic Arterial Infusion in Combination with Modern Systemic Chemotherapy is Associated with Improved Survival Compared with Modern Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Patients with Isolated Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Case-Control Study.
Bahary, N; Bartlett, DL; Choudry, MH; Clifford, AK; Dhir, M; Hogg, ME; Holtzman, MP; Jones, HL; Perkins, S; Pingpank, JF; Shuai, Y; Steve, J; Zeh, HJ; Zureikat, AH, 2017
)
0.46
"In this case-control study of patients with IU-CRCLM, HAI in combination with CT was associated with improved OS when compared with modern systemic CT alone."( Hepatic Arterial Infusion in Combination with Modern Systemic Chemotherapy is Associated with Improved Survival Compared with Modern Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Patients with Isolated Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Case-Control Study.
Bahary, N; Bartlett, DL; Choudry, MH; Clifford, AK; Dhir, M; Hogg, ME; Holtzman, MP; Jones, HL; Perkins, S; Pingpank, JF; Shuai, Y; Steve, J; Zeh, HJ; Zureikat, AH, 2017
)
0.46
"The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the potential of pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions between ramucirumab and irinotecan or its metabolite, SN-38, when administered with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI)."( Lack of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between ramucirumab and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Asakiewicz, C; Braiteh, F; Chaudhary, A; Denlinger, CS; Gao, L; Lee, JJ; Lin, Y; LoRusso, P; Nasroulah, F; Shepard, DR; Wang, D, 2016
)
0.87
"There was no PK drug-drug interaction between ramucirumab and irinotecan or its metabolite, SN-38."( Lack of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction between ramucirumab and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Asakiewicz, C; Braiteh, F; Chaudhary, A; Denlinger, CS; Gao, L; Lee, JJ; Lin, Y; LoRusso, P; Nasroulah, F; Shepard, DR; Wang, D, 2016
)
0.91
" This randomized phase II study evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of icrucumab and ramucirumab each in combination with mFOLFOX-6 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after disease progression on first-line therapy with a fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan."( Randomized phase II study of modified FOLFOX-6 in combination with ramucirumab or icrucumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after disease progression on first-line irinotecan-based therapy.
Alcindor, T; Asmis, T; Bendell, J; Berry, S; Binder, P; Burkes, R; Chan, E; Chan, T; Gao, L; Gill, S; Jeyakumar, A; Kambhampati, SR; Kauh, J; Kudrik, F; Moore, M; Nasroulah, F; Ramdas, N; Rao, S; Rothenstein, J; Spratlin, J; Strevel, E; Tang, PA; Tang, S; Yang, L; Zbuk, K, 2016
)
0.8
"Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive mFOLFOX-6 alone (mFOLFOX-6) or in combination with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg IV (RAM+mFOLFOX-6) or icrucumab 15 mg/kg IV (ICR+mFOLFOX-6) every 2 weeks."( Randomized phase II study of modified FOLFOX-6 in combination with ramucirumab or icrucumab as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after disease progression on first-line irinotecan-based therapy.
Alcindor, T; Asmis, T; Bendell, J; Berry, S; Binder, P; Burkes, R; Chan, E; Chan, T; Gao, L; Gill, S; Jeyakumar, A; Kambhampati, SR; Kauh, J; Kudrik, F; Moore, M; Nasroulah, F; Ramdas, N; Rao, S; Rothenstein, J; Spratlin, J; Strevel, E; Tang, PA; Tang, S; Yang, L; Zbuk, K, 2016
)
0.62
" These changes can increase the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in patients on multiple medications."( Role of Toll-like receptor 4 in drug-drug interaction between paclitaxel and irinotecan in vitro.
Basu, S; Ghose, R; Mallick, P; Moorthy, B, 2017
)
0.68
"In this phase 1 dose-escalation trial in patients with unresectable PDAC, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of olaparib (tablet formulation) in combination with irinotecan 70 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 28-day cycle (olaparib plus IC)."( Olaparib in combination with irinotecan, cisplatin, and mitomycin C in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Azad, NS; De Jesus-Acosta, A; Donehower, RC; Fine, RL; Goggins, M; Jaffee, EM; Johnson, BA; Laheru, DA; Le, DT; Myzak, MC; Oberstein, PE; Yarchoan, M; Zheng, L, 2017
)
0.94
"Olaparib had substantial toxicity when combined with IC or ICM in patients with PDAC, and this treatment combination did not have an acceptable risk/benefit profile for further study."( Olaparib in combination with irinotecan, cisplatin, and mitomycin C in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Azad, NS; De Jesus-Acosta, A; Donehower, RC; Fine, RL; Goggins, M; Jaffee, EM; Johnson, BA; Laheru, DA; Le, DT; Myzak, MC; Oberstein, PE; Yarchoan, M; Zheng, L, 2017
)
0.75
"An intestine-liver-glioblastoma biomimetic system was developed to evaluate the drug combination therapy for glioblastoma."( Evaluation of drug combination for glioblastoma based on an intestine-liver metabolic model on microchip.
He, Z; Jie, M; Li, HF; Lin, JM; Liu, H; Mao, S, 2017
)
0.46
" The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of quercetin combined with irinotecan/SN-38 in the AGS human gastric cancer cell line in vitro and in vivo."( Effects of quercetin combined with anticancer drugs on metastasis-associated factors of gastric cancer cells: in vitro and in vivo studies.
Hou, YC; Lei, CS; Lin, MT; Pai, MH; Yeh, SL, 2018
)
0.7
"CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry were used to assess the effects of bFGF mAb combined with irinotecan on the proliferation and apoptosis of H223 cells, respectively."( [Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor antibody combined with irinotecan on proliferation and apoptosis of small cell lung cancer H223 cells in vitro].
Liao, XH; Xiang, JJ; Xu, M, 2017
)
0.91
" A prospective clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluorouracil monotherapy combined with panitumumab administered to patients with KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) intolerant to oxaliplatin and irinotecan."( A phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of panitumumab combined with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the PF trial.
Denda, T; Fukunaga, M; Kanda, M; Kataoka, M; Kim, HM; Mishima, H; Munemoto, Y; Nagata, N; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Takano, N; Takemoto, H; Tokunaga, Y, 2018
)
0.66
" Panitumumab (6 mg/kg) was intravenously administered every 2 weeks, combined with fluorouracil monotherapy, in 2-week cycles."( A phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of panitumumab combined with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the PF trial.
Denda, T; Fukunaga, M; Kanda, M; Kataoka, M; Kim, HM; Mishima, H; Munemoto, Y; Nagata, N; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Takano, N; Takemoto, H; Tokunaga, Y, 2018
)
0.48
"5%) met eligibility criteria and received 7 cycles (median) of fluorouracil chemotherapy combined with panitumumab."( A phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of panitumumab combined with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the PF trial.
Denda, T; Fukunaga, M; Kanda, M; Kataoka, M; Kim, HM; Mishima, H; Munemoto, Y; Nagata, N; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Takano, N; Takemoto, H; Tokunaga, Y, 2018
)
0.48
"Fluorouracil monotherapy combined with panitumumab was safely administered to patients with KRAS WT mCRC intolerant to oxaliplatin and irinotecan."( A phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of panitumumab combined with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the PF trial.
Denda, T; Fukunaga, M; Kanda, M; Kataoka, M; Kim, HM; Mishima, H; Munemoto, Y; Nagata, N; Oba, K; Sakamoto, J; Takano, N; Takemoto, H; Tokunaga, Y, 2018
)
0.68
"The last decade has seen the increasing use of biological medicines in combination with chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin or irinotecan for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, and Panitumumab) in Combination with Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Almeida, PHRF; Andrade, EIG; Cherchiglia, ML; da Silva, WC; de Araujo, VE; de Assis Acurcio, F; Dos Santos, JBR; Godman, B; Kurdi, A; Lima, EMEA; Silva, MRRD, 2018
)
0.68
" In the NAPOLI-1 trial, liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil (nal-iri/5FU) was shown to improve overall survival when compared to fluorouracil alone for metastatic pancreatic cancer."( Comparison of conventional versus liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience.
Arango, MJ; Noonan, AM; Porter, K; Reardon, J; Tossey, JC; VanDeusen, JB, 2019
)
1.05
"This study aimed to examine the efficacy of metabolically supported administration of chemotherapy combined with ketogenic diet, hyperthermia, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer."( Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Metabolically Supported Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine-Based or FOLFIRINOX Regimen Combined with Ketogenic Diet, Hyperthermia, and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.
Iyikesici, MS, 2020
)
0.56
"Anti-EGFR MoAbs as a monotherapy or in combination with either irinotecan-based chemotherapy or FOLFOX in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC have better response and survival outcome, whereas OS does not benefit from adding anti-EGFR MoAbs to another oxaliplatin-based regimen."( Efficacy and safety of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies combined with different chemotherapy regimens in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Han, J; Li, J; Li, Y; Su, Y; Sun, H; Wu, X; Zhou, X, 2019
)
0.75
" We hypothesized that pelareorep in combination with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with PDAC would be safe and effective."( Pembrolizumab in Combination with the Oncolytic Virus Pelareorep and Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Phase Ib Study.
Arora, SP; Cheetham, K; Coffey, M; Eng, KH; Fields, P; Fountzilas, C; Kalinski, P; Mahalingam, D; Moseley, JL; Nuovo, G; Raber, P; Wilkinson, GA; Zhang, B, 2020
)
0.56
" Particularly, the expression of tumour-suppressing gene Ccdc80 was induced by vactosertib and further induced by vactosertib in combination with nal-IRI/5-FU/LV."( Inhibition of TGF-β signalling in combination with nal-IRI plus 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin suppresses invasion and prolongs survival in pancreatic tumour mouse models.
An, H; Heo, JS; Hong, CP; Hong, E; Kang, JM; Kim, SJ; Lee, S; Ooshima, A; Park, J; Park, JO; Park, S; Park, SH, 2020
)
0.56
"Vincristine combined with camptothecin derivatives showed synergy in preclinical pediatric cancer models, and the combinations are effective in treatment of childhood solid tumors."( Evaluation of Eribulin Combined with Irinotecan for Treatment of Pediatric Cancer Xenografts.
Bandyopadhyay, A; Chen, Y; Erickson, SW; Houghton, PJ; Kurmashev, D; Kurmasheva, RT; Lai, Z; Phelps, DA; Robles, AJ; Smith, MA, 2020
)
0.83
"Vincristine or eribulin, alone or combined with irinotecan, was studied in 12 xenograft models."( Evaluation of Eribulin Combined with Irinotecan for Treatment of Pediatric Cancer Xenografts.
Bandyopadhyay, A; Chen, Y; Erickson, SW; Houghton, PJ; Kurmashev, D; Kurmasheva, RT; Lai, Z; Phelps, DA; Robles, AJ; Smith, MA, 2020
)
1.09
"Eribulin combined with irinotecan was more effective than vincristine-irinotecan in 6 of 12 models."( Evaluation of Eribulin Combined with Irinotecan for Treatment of Pediatric Cancer Xenografts.
Bandyopadhyay, A; Chen, Y; Erickson, SW; Houghton, PJ; Kurmashev, D; Kurmasheva, RT; Lai, Z; Phelps, DA; Robles, AJ; Smith, MA, 2020
)
1.14
" The drug combination administered at clinical doses resulted in significantly higher antagonistic interactions compared to the low-dose optimized drug combination (ODC)."( Drug-Drug Interactions of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid and Oxaliplatin and Its Activity in Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment.
Nowak-Sliwinska, P; Ramzy, GM; Rausch, M; Zoetemelk, M, 2020
)
0.86
" Against this backdrop, the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan(nal-IRI)in combination with fluorouracil and folinic acid(FF)for progressive metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine therapy was confirmed in Europe in 2015 ahead of Japan."( [Nanoliposomal Irinotecan in Combination with Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid, As a New Option for Second-Line Treatment in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer].
Ueno, M, 2020
)
1.16
" This meta-analysis discusses the efficacy and side effects of BVZ combined with irinotecan in the treatment of patients (younger than 21 years of age) with recurrent, progressive or refractory intracranial tumours."( Therapeutic effect and side effects of Bevacizumab combined with Irinotecan in the treatment of paediatric intracranial tumours: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Di, F; Li, Q; Ma, HY; Sun, T; Xiang, RL; Xu, Y, 2020
)
1.02
"BVZ combined with irinotecan-based chemotherapy had a better response and prolonged survival in the treatment of paediatric intracranial tumours than radiation therapy or chemotherapy."( Therapeutic effect and side effects of Bevacizumab combined with Irinotecan in the treatment of paediatric intracranial tumours: Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Di, F; Li, Q; Ma, HY; Sun, T; Xiang, RL; Xu, Y, 2020
)
1.13
" The current study aimed to evaluate the effects of anlotinib in combination with irinotecan on H446 and H2227 SCLC cell lines and provide new treatment strategy for SCLC."( A novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib combined with irinotecan has in-vitro anti-tumor activity against human small-cell lung cancer.
Cheng, Y; Li, H; Liu, J; Liu, X; Liu, Y; Zhao, D, 2020
)
1.02
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with nedaplatin in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC)."( The efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with nedaplatin in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Fang, S; Fu, J; Wang, D; Wang, Y; Wen, Y; Yin, X,
)
0.69
" Thirty-two patients in group A were treated with irinotecan combined with nedaplatin, while 32 patients in group B were treated with irinotecan combined with cisplatin."( The efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with nedaplatin in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Fang, S; Fu, J; Wang, D; Wang, Y; Wen, Y; Yin, X,
)
0.68
"The efficacy of irinotecan combined with nedaplatin is good and the safety is high in the treatment of SCLC and it can be used as a clinical treatment method of SCLC and is worthy of being generalized."( The efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with nedaplatin in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Fang, S; Fu, J; Wang, D; Wang, Y; Wen, Y; Yin, X,
)
0.77
" We conducted a phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety of olaratumab and determine a recommended dose in combination with three different chemotherapy regimens in children."( Phase 1 trial of olaratumab monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory solid and central nervous system tumors.
Bishop, MW; Borinstein, SC; DuBois, SG; Hingorani, P; Krystal, J; Laetsch, TW; Levy, DE; Mascarenhas, L; Mo, G; Muscal, JA; Ogawa, C; Shahir, A; Slotkin, EK; Weigel, BJ; Wright, J, 2021
)
0.62
" Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal ablative technique that provides an alternative in patients with LAPC and can be safely combined with chemotherapy."( Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) Combined With Chemotherapy Increases Survival in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC).
Astras, G; Davakis, S; Dimitrokallis, N; Felekouras, E; Karamouzis, MV; Kountourakis, P; Moris, D; Oikonomou, D; Papalampros, A; Papamichael, D; Petrou, AS; Schizas, D, 2021
)
0.62
"Administration of green tea (GT) catechins has been reported to ensue antitumor activity in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs against different cancer types."( Green tea catechins in combination with irinotecan attenuates tumorigenesis and treatment-associated toxicity in an inflammation-associated colon cancer mice model.
Bharali, MK; Borah, G, 2021
)
0.89
"In this study, we investigated the antitumor effects of GT alone or in combination with IRN in inflammation-associated colon cancer mouse model induced by azoxymethane (AOM) and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)."( Green tea catechins in combination with irinotecan attenuates tumorigenesis and treatment-associated toxicity in an inflammation-associated colon cancer mice model.
Bharali, MK; Borah, G, 2021
)
0.89
" In this study, CPT11 alone or combined with dual-function inhibitors (baicalein (BA) silymarin (SM), glycyrrhizic acid (GA), and glycyrrhetinic acid (GLA)) of P-gp and CYP450 loaded in a lecithin-based self-nanoemulsifying nanoemulsion preconcentrate (LBSNENP) to improve the solubility and inhibit the elimination by P-gp and CYP450."( CPT11 with P-glycoprotein/CYP 3A4 dual-function inhibitor by self-nanoemulsifying nanoemulsion combined with gastroretentive technology to enhance the oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy against pancreatic adenocarcinomas.
Chen, LC; Cheng, WJ; Hsieh, CM; Hung, MT; Lin, HL; Lin, SY; Sheu, MT, 2021
)
0.62
"Doublet or triplet chemotherapy regimens in combination with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAb), such as cetuximab or panitumumab, or the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor mAb bevacizumab, are the current recommended standard of care therapies for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Triplet chemotherapy in combination with anti-EGFR agents for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Current evidence, advances, and future perspectives.
Cremolini, C; Esser, R; Falcone, A; Folprecht, G; Martinelli, E; Mazard, T; Modest, DP; Tsuji, A, 2022
)
0.72
"This detailed preclinical investigation, including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and dose-schedule optimizations, of AZD6738/ceralasertib alone and in combination with chemotherapy or PARP inhibitors can inform ongoing clinical efforts to treat cancer with ATR inhibitors."( ATR Inhibitor AZD6738 (Ceralasertib) Exerts Antitumor Activity as a Monotherapy and in Combination with Chemotherapy and the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib.
Bargh-Dawson, H; Brown, E; Gerrard, J; Hughes, AM; Jones, GN; Lau, A; O'Connor, MJ; Odedra, R; Wallez, Y; Wijnhoven, PWG; Wilson, Z; Young, LA, 2022
)
0.72
" We therefore suggest that future studies should focus on elucidating the complex interplay between chemotherapy in combination with luminal irritants on the intestinal permeability of other probes."( Chemotherapeutics Combined with Luminal Irritants: Effects on Small-Intestinal Mannitol Permeability and Villus Length in Rats.
Cano-Cebrián, MJ; Dahlgren, D; Kullenberg, F; Lennernäs, H; Olander, T; Peters, K; Sjöblom, M, 2022
)
0.72
"A case-control study was adopted to investigate the efficacy and side effects of irinotecan combined with nedaplatin (NP) versus paclitaxel combined with cisplatin for locally advanced cervical cancer (CC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and to analyze the changes in tumor marker levels."( Efficacy and Side Effects of Irinotecan Combined with Nedaplatin versus Paclitaxel Combined with Cisplatin in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and Tumor Marker Analysis: Based on a Retrospective Analysis.
Chen, Z; Jiang, Y; Song, B, 2022
)
1.24
" Among them, 53 patients received paclitaxel combined with cisplatin as the control group, and the other 43 patients received irinotecan combined with NP as the observation group."( Efficacy and Side Effects of Irinotecan Combined with Nedaplatin versus Paclitaxel Combined with Cisplatin in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and Tumor Marker Analysis: Based on a Retrospective Analysis.
Chen, Z; Jiang, Y; Song, B, 2022
)
1.22
"Irinotecan in combination with nedaplatin can be an effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for advanced localized cervical cancer, particularly in patients with combined diabetes."( Efficacy and Side Effects of Irinotecan Combined with Nedaplatin versus Paclitaxel Combined with Cisplatin in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and Tumor Marker Analysis: Based on a Retrospective Analysis.
Chen, Z; Jiang, Y; Song, B, 2022
)
2.46
" In this study, we report the safety and efficacy of cetuximab (an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor) in combination with 5-FU plus irinotecan based chemotherapy."( Efficacy and tolerance of cetuximab in combination with 5 FU plus irinotecan based chemotherapy in metastatic squamous cell anal carcinoma.
Boige, V; Boilève, A; Cervantes, B; Ducreux, M; Hollebecque, A; Malka, D; Smolenschi, C; Valery, M, 2023
)
1.35
" Topoisomerase-I inhibitor irinotecan is used clinically to treat colorectal cancer (CRC), often in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU)."( ATM kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in preclinical models of colorectal cancer.
Bagby, SM; Cadogan, EB; Davis, SL; Diamond, JR; Durant, ST; Hartman, SJ; Hughes, GD; Leal, AD; Lieu, CH; Messersmith, WA; Pitts, TM; Schlaepfer, M; Simmons, DM; Tse, T; Yacob, BW, 2022
)
1.27
" Immunoblotting results suggest an increase in DDR associated with irinotecan therapy, with a reduced effect noted when combined with AZD0156, which is more pronounced in some models."( ATM kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in preclinical models of colorectal cancer.
Bagby, SM; Cadogan, EB; Davis, SL; Diamond, JR; Durant, ST; Hartman, SJ; Hughes, GD; Leal, AD; Lieu, CH; Messersmith, WA; Pitts, TM; Schlaepfer, M; Simmons, DM; Tse, T; Yacob, BW, 2022
)
1.21
"This study aimed to investigate the short-term efficacy and adverse reactions of irinotecan combined with first-line chemotherapeutics for the treatment of pediatric hepatoblastoma with pulmonary metastasis (HB-PM)."( Clinical application of irinotecan combined with first-line chemotherapeutics against pediatric hepatoblastoma with pulmonary metastasis.
Hu, H; Huang, D; Li, F; Li, J; Mei, Y; Wen, Y; Zhang, W, 2022
)
1.25
" In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy in HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)."( Trastuzumab Combined with Irinotecan in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Single-Arm Study and Exploratory Biomarker Analysis.
Bai, Y; Gong, J; Huang, D; Ji, C; Li, J; Li, Y; Shen, L; Sun, Y; Wang, X; Wang, Z; Xin, Y; Xu, T; Zhang, X; Zhao, F, 2023
)
1.21
"Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is a potentially effective and well-tolerated therapeutic regimen in mCRC with a high HER2 copy number."( Trastuzumab Combined with Irinotecan in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Single-Arm Study and Exploratory Biomarker Analysis.
Bai, Y; Gong, J; Huang, D; Ji, C; Li, J; Li, Y; Shen, L; Sun, Y; Wang, X; Wang, Z; Xin, Y; Xu, T; Zhang, X; Zhao, F, 2023
)
1.21
" F3 bromelain may be a potential and potent drug for clinical use due to its anticancer efficacy and high synergistic cytotoxicity when combined with a routine chemotherapeutic agent for CRC."( Cytotoxic properties of unfractionated and fractionated bromelain alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents in colorectal cancer cells.
Azarkan, M; Chang, YJ; Chen, HA; Huang, CY; M'Rabet, N; Makondi, PT; Tsai, KY; Wei, PL, 2023
)
0.91
"This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of resveratrol(RES) combined with irinotecan(IRI) in the treatment of colorectal cancer(CRC)."( [Molecular mechanism of resveratrol combined with irinotecan in treatment of colorectal cancer].
Han, CL; Li, F; Li, KY; Liu, M; Shen, H; Wang, J; Wang, L; Yan, RY, 2023
)
1.39
" The objective of this study was to investigate the security and effectiveness of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed or irinotecan monotherapy for salvage chemotherapy of ESCC."( Efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed or irinotecan monotherapy for salvage chemotherapy of esophageal squamous cell cancer: A prospective, open label, randomized phase II study.
Bian, W; Chen, S; Dai, X; Tao, L; Wang, J; Wu, W, 2023
)
1.45
" Patients were randomly divided into irinotecan combined with raltitrexed group (experiment group) and irinotecan monotherapy group (control group)."( Efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with raltitrexed or irinotecan monotherapy for salvage chemotherapy of esophageal squamous cell cancer: A prospective, open label, randomized phase II study.
Bian, W; Chen, S; Dai, X; Tao, L; Wang, J; Wu, W, 2023
)
1.49
"To date, oxaliplatin and irinotecan are used in combination with 5-flourouracil (5-FU) for metastatic colorectal cancer."( Radiosensitizing Effects of Irinotecan versus Oxaliplatin Alone and in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil on Human Colorectal Cancer Cells.
Bock, F; Cappel, ML; Frerker, B; Hildebrandt, G; Klautke, G; Kriesen, S; Manda, K, 2023
)
1.51
" The authors investigated which dose could be administered safely in combination with standard palliative chemotherapy."( Phase I study of intraperitoneal irinotecan combined with palliative systemic chemotherapy in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases.
Bakkers, C; Bax, R; Brandt-Kerkhof, ARM; Buijs, SM; Burger, JWA; Creemers, GM; de Boer, NL; de Hingh, IHJT; de Man, FM; Diepeveen, M; Dietz, MV; Koolen, SLW; Lurvink, RJ; Mathijssen, RHJ; van Eerden, RAG; van Kooten, JP; van Meerten, E; Verhoef, C, 2023
)
1.19
" We then evaluated the antitumor activity of MSLN-targeted CAR T cells alone or in combination with the chemotherapeutic drug irinotecan or an anti-PD-1 antibody in vitro and in vivo."( Mesothelin-targeted CAR-T therapy combined with irinotecan for the treatment of solid cancer.
Chen, L; Chen, X; Feng, M; He, H; Lan, S; Wang, K; Zhu, Y; Zuo, D, 2023
)
1.37

Bioavailability

Irinotecan (IRN) (CPT-11) is a camptothecin derivative with low oral bioavailability due to active efflux by intestinal P-glycoprotein receptors. Inhibition of intestinal hCES2A can alleviate irinotacan-induced gut toxicity.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The drug is well absorbed from small intestine."( [Topoisomerase inhibitors developing in Japan].
Furue, H, 1993
)
0.29
"Although topoisomerase inhibitors, such as camptothecin and topotecan, have been widely used in the treatment of nonglial tumors, their application for gliomas has been limited by poor efficacy relative to toxicity that may in part reflect limited bioavailability and blood stability of these agents."( Potent topoisomerase I inhibition by novel silatecans eliminates glioma proliferation in vitro and in vivo.
Bom, D; Burke, TG; Curran, DP; Erff, M; Pollack, IF; Strode, JT, 1999
)
0.3
" Genetic polymorphisms of the UGT1A1 would affect an interindividual variation of the toxicity by irinotecan via the alternation of bioavailability of SN-38."( Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: a pharmacogenetic analysis.
Ando, M; Ando, Y; Hasegawa, Y; Muro, K; Saitoh, S; Saka, H; Sawa, T; Shimokata, K; Ueoka, H; Yokoyama, A, 2000
)
0.77
"Irinotecan (CPT-11) is a camptothecin analog with low (about 10--20%) and variable oral bioavailability in animal models."( Active transepithelial transport of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its metabolites by human intestinal Caco-2 cells.
de Bruijn, P; de Jonge, MJ; Kurihara, M; Nishiyama, M; Sparreboom, A; Takano, H; Verweij, J; Yamamoto, W, 2001
)
2.03
"The novel camptothecin derivative BNP1350 (7-[2-trimethylsilyl)ethyl]-20(S)-camptothecin), also known as Karenitecin, has been developed for superior oral bioavailability and increased lactone stability."( Novel camptothecin derivative BNP1350 in experimental human ovarian cancer: determination of efficacy and possible mechanisms of resistance.
Boven, E; Hausheer, FH; Pinedo, HM; Schlüper, HM; Van Hattum, AH, 2002
)
0.31
" Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic biomodulation, to enhance the bioavailability of the active anticancer agent or to reduce drug related toxicities have currently reached clinical application."( Pharmacology of topoisomerase I inhibitors irinotecan (CPT-11) and topotecan.
Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J, 2002
)
0.58
" However, gefitinib treatment dramatically increased the oral bioavailability of irinotecan after simultaneous oral administration."( Gefitinib enhances the antitumor activity and oral bioavailability of irinotecan in mice.
Cheshire, PJ; Daw, N; Germain, GS; Gilbertson, R; Harwood, FC; Houghton, PJ; Jenkins, JJ; Leggas, M; Panetta, JC; Peterson, J; Schuetz, JD; Stewart, CF, 2004
)
0.78
" The pyrimidine analog trifluorothymidine (TFT) is part of the anti-cancer drug formulation TAS-102, which was developed to enhance the bioavailability of TFT in vivo, and is currently being evaluated as an oral chemotherapeutic agent in phase I clinical studies."( Irinotecan-induced cytotoxicity to colon cancer cells in vitro is stimulated by pre-incubation with trifluorothymidine.
Fukushima, M; Hoebe, EK; Peters, GJ; Temmink, OH, 2007
)
1.78
"Studies suggest that complexation with PAMAM dendrimers has the potential to improve the oral bioavailability of SN-38."( Potential oral delivery of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38) using poly(amidoamine) dendrimers.
Ghandehari, H; Kolhatkar, RB; Swaan, P, 2008
)
0.35
" The absolute bioavailability (F) of irinotecan control was 33%, which was increased to 43% (1."( Pre-clinical evidence for altered absorption and biliary excretion of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with quercetin: possible contribution of P-glycoprotein.
Awasthi, A; Bansal, T; Jaggi, M; Khar, RK; Talegaonkar, S, 2008
)
0.85
" In the present study, irinotecan showed an absolute bioavailability of 30% as calculated from the pharmacokinetic data."( Development and validation of reversed phase liquid chromatographic method utilizing ultraviolet detection for quantification of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its active metabolite, SN-38, in rat plasma and bile samples: application to pharmacokinetic studies.
Awasthi, A; Bansal, T; Jaggi, M; Khar, RK; Talegaonkar, S, 2008
)
0.86
" To assess the effect of gefitinib on the pharmacokinetics of IV irinotecan and on the bioavailability of a single oral dose of irinotecan."( Tyrosine kinase inhibitor enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.
Crews, KR; Daw, NC; Furman, WL; Gajjar, AJ; Houghton, PJ; McCarville, MB; McGregor, LM; Navid, F; Panetta, JC; Rodriguez-Galindo, C; Santana, VM; Spunt, SL; Stewart, CF; Wu, J, 2009
)
0.83
" Gefitinib significantly enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan."( Tyrosine kinase inhibitor enhances the bioavailability of oral irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.
Crews, KR; Daw, NC; Furman, WL; Gajjar, AJ; Houghton, PJ; McCarville, MB; McGregor, LM; Navid, F; Panetta, JC; Rodriguez-Galindo, C; Santana, VM; Spunt, SL; Stewart, CF; Wu, J, 2009
)
0.83
" Compound 5 has a good oral bioavailability and effectively inhibits tumor growth in the SJSA-1 xenograft model."( Potent and orally active small-molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction.
Chen, J; Ding, K; Kang, S; McEachern, D; Miller, R; Nikolovska-Coleska, Z; Qin, D; Qiu, S; Shangary, S; Wang, G; Wang, S; Yang, D; Yu, S, 2009
)
0.35
" If a substrate drug with oral bioavailability is equal to or less than 80%, an intravenous drug interaction study at low dose along with a few key oral drug interaction studies could be useful for achieving this objective with the aid of modeling and simulations."( Ongoing challenges in drug interaction safety: from exposure to pharmacogenomics.
Bai, JP, 2010
)
0.36
" Treatment with PEO-PPO-PEO micelles resulted in prolonged circulation time in blood and increased bioavailability of CPT-11 and SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin)."( Effect of poly (ethylene oxide)-poly (propylene oxide)-poly (ethylene oxide) micelles on pharmacokinetics and intestinal toxicity of irinotecan hydrochloride: potential involvement of breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2).
Gan, L; Gan, Y; Guo, S; Zhang, X; Zhu, C, 2010
)
0.56
" Together these results show that PAMAM dendrimers have the potential to improve the oral bioavailability of potent anti-cancer drugs."( G3.5 PAMAM dendrimers enhance transepithelial transport of SN38 while minimizing gastrointestinal toxicity.
Ghandehari, H; Goldberg, DS; Swaan, PW; Vijayalakshmi, N, 2011
)
0.37
"This study describes a nanoparticle assembly containing cyclodextrin-based polymer and camptothecin, resulting in increased bioavailability of camptothecin, an effective but toxic anti-cancer agent."( Preclinical study of the cyclodextrin-polymer conjugate of camptothecin CRLX101 for the treatment of gastric cancer.
Chen, L; Davis, M; Gaur, S; Wang, Y; Yen, T; Yen, Y; Zhou, B, 2012
)
0.38
" Thus, the knowledge about the characteristic and site-specific expression of CES1 and CES2 in rat intestine will help to predict the oral bioavailability of ester prodrugs."( Identification of carboxylesterases expressed in rat intestine and effects of their hydrolyzing activity in predicting first-pass metabolism of ester prodrugs.
Gao, J; Liu, D; Liu, Y; Ren, X; Xu, Y; Zhang, C, 2011
)
0.37
" However, the low water solubility and low bioavailability of everolimus have prevented its clinical development as an anticancer drug."( Preparation and in vivo evaluation of liposomal everolimus for lung carcinoma and thyroid carcinoma.
Iwase, Y; Maitani, Y, 2012
)
0.38
"Vandetanib (an orally bioavailable VEGFR-2 and EGFR tyrosine kinases inhibitor) was combined at 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg daily with standard dosed cetuximab and irinotecan (3+3 dose-escalation design)."( Phase I study of cetuximab, irinotecan, and vandetanib (ZD6474) as therapy for patients with previously treated metastastic colorectal cancer.
Abrams, TA; Ancukiewicz, M; Blaszkowsky, L; Chan, JA; Duda, DG; Elliott, M; Enzinger, PC; Goldstein, M; Jain, RK; Kulke, MH; Meyerhardt, JA; Regan, E; Schrag, D; Wolpin, BM; Zhu, AX, 2012
)
0.87
" Bioavailability for bead-based delivery was double that for IV administration, which was attributed to reduced clearance of the drug when delivered by this route."( Feasibility, safety and pharmacokinetic study of hepatic administration of drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) followed by intravenous administration of irinotecan in a porcine model.
Chung, ST; Czuczman, P; Finnie, J; Foster, D; Holden, RR; Kuchel, T; Lewis, AL; Porter, S, 2013
)
0.6
" A novel series of potent and orally bioavailable 3-alkoxyamino-5-(pyridin-2-ylamino)pyrazine-2-carbonitrile CHK1 inhibitors was generated by hybridization of two lead scaffolds derived from fragment-based drug design and optimized for CHK1 potency and high selectivity using a cell-based assay cascade."( Discovery of 3-alkoxyamino-5-(pyridin-2-ylamino)pyrazine-2-carbonitriles as selective, orally bioavailable CHK1 inhibitors.
Aherne, GW; Box, G; Boxall, KJ; Collins, I; de Haven Brandon, AK; Eccles, SA; Eve, PD; Garrett, MD; Hayes, A; Lainchbury, M; Matthews, TP; McHardy, T; Raynaud, FI; Reader, JC; Valenti, MR; Walton, MI, 2012
)
0.38
" These transporters are expressed site- and membrane-specifically in enterocytes, which affects the bioavailability of ingested substrate drugs."( [Role of ABC efflux transporters in the oral bioavailability and drug-induced intestinal toxicity].
Yokooji, T, 2013
)
0.39
"Irinotecan is a camptothecin derivative with low oral bioavailability due to active efflux by intestinal P-glycoprotein receptors."( Nano scale self-emulsifying oil based carrier system for improved oral bioavailability of camptothecin derivative by P-Glycoprotein modulation.
Negi, LM; Talegaonkar, S; Tariq, M, 2013
)
1.83
"006), demonstrating that modulation of i2 levels meaningfully impacts drug bioavailability and cellular response."( Dual roles for splice variants of the glucuronidation pathway as regulators of cellular metabolism.
Bellemare, J; Guillemette, C; Roberge, J; Rouleau, M, 2014
)
0.4
" Pharmacokinetic analysis confirms that co-administration of gefitinib increases irinotecan bioavailability leading to an increased SN-38 lactone systemic exposure."( Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral gefitinib and irinotecan in children with refractory solid tumors.
Brennan, RC; Furman, W; Mao, S; McGregor, LM; Santana, V; Stewart, CF; Turner, DC; Wu, J, 2014
)
0.86
" Mouse oral bioavailability was complete (100%) with extensive tumor exposure."( The clinical development candidate CCT245737 is an orally active CHK1 inhibitor with preclinical activity in RAS mutant NSCLC and Eµ-MYC driven B-cell lymphoma.
Aherne, GW; Box, G; Boxall, KJ; Collins, I; De Haven Brandon, AK; Eccles, SA; Eve, PD; Garrett, MD; Hayes, A; Henley, AT; Hunter, JE; Lainchbury, M; Matthews, TP; McHardy, T; Osborne, J; Perkins, ND; Raynaud, FI; Reader, JC; Swales, K; Tall, M; Valenti, MR; Walton, MI, 2016
)
0.43
" These nanodispersions have much increased bioavailability and thereby improved anti-cancer activities."( Amphiphilic drugs as surfactants to fabricate excipient-free stable nanodispersions of hydrophobic drugs for cancer chemotherapy.
Hu, S; Lee, DH; Lee, E; Li, X; Li, Y; Liu, X; Shen, Y; Tang, J; Wang, C; Wang, J; Zhou, Z, 2015
)
0.42
" Lipid-based carriers are well-known for their ability to improve oral absorption and bioavailability of lipid soluble and highly permeable compounds."( Lipophilic Prodrugs of SN38: Synthesis and in Vitro Characterization toward Oral Chemotherapy.
Bala, V; Li, P; Prestidge, CA; Rao, S; Wang, S, 2016
)
0.43
" This phase I study determined the MTD, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of veliparib, an orally bioavailable PARP1/2 inhibitor, in combination with irinotecan."( Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Veliparib (ABT-888) in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.
Bell, T; Boerner, JL; Boerner, SA; Bowditch, A; Burger, A; Cai, D; Chen, AP; Cleary, JM; Ferry-Galow, K; Heilbrun, LK; Ji, J; Kinders, RJ; Li, J; LoRusso, PM; Marrero, AM; Parchment, RE; Pilat, MJ; Rubinstein, L; Sausville, EA; Shapiro, GI; Smith, D; Tolaney, SM; Wolanski, A; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
0.82
" Irinotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, has activity in these sarcomas, but due to poor bioavailability of its active metabolite (SN-38) has had limited clinical efficacy."( STA-8666, a novel HSP90 inhibitor/SN-38 drug conjugate, causes complete tumor regression in preclinical mouse models of pediatric sarcoma.
Baumgart, JT; Edessa, LD; Helman, LJ; Heske, CM; Lee, S; Mendoza, A; Neckers, L; Proia, DA; Trepel, J, 2016
)
1.34
" Besides, compared to the SN-38 solution, SN-38/NCs-A had a higher bioavailability after intravenous injection; while the bioavailability of SN-38/NCs-B was even lower than that of the SN-38 solution."( In vitro and in vivo evaluation of SN-38 nanocrystals with different particle sizes.
Chen, M; Dong, Y; Gao, J; Hua, Y; Li, W; Li, Y; Zhang, H; Zhang, X; Zhao, L; Zheng, A, 2017
)
0.46
" However, the limited bioavailability of curcumin prevents its use for modulation of the function of these transporters in the clinical setting."( Synthetic Analogs of Curcumin Modulate the Function of Multidrug Resistance-Linked ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter ABCG2.
Ambudkar, SV; Chufan, EE; Fukuda, M; Ishida, M; Iwabuchi, Y; Kanehara, K; Kudoh, K; Murakami, M; Naitoh, T; Ohnuma, S; Shibata, H; Sugisawa, N; Unno, M, 2017
)
0.46
"Fluorination is a well-known strategy for improving the bioavailability of bioactive molecules in the lead optimization phase of drug discovery projects."( Design, semisynthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 10-fluorocamptothecin derivatives.
Goto, M; Hsu, PL; Lee, KH; Liu, YQ; Morris-Natschke, SL; Shang, XF; Song, ZL; Wang, MJ; Yang, CJ; Yang, QR; Zhang, XS, 2017
)
0.46
"Irinotecan (IRN) (CPT-11) is a camptothecin derivative with low oral bioavailability due to active efflux by intestinal P-glycoprotein (p-gp) receptors."( Improvement of oral efficacy of Irinotecan through biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles through in vitro and in vivo investigations.
Ahmad, N; Ahmad, R; Alam, MA; Jalees Ahmad, F; Umar, S, 2018
)
2.21
" Chitosan (CS)-coated-IRN-loaded-poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) (CS-IRN-PLGA-NPs)in order to enhance oral bioavailability of IRN."( Improvement of oral efficacy of Irinotecan through biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles through in vitro and in vivo investigations.
Ahmad, N; Ahmad, R; Alam, MA; Jalees Ahmad, F; Umar, S, 2018
)
0.76
"03 fold in Wistar rat's plasma as well as brain higher oral bioavailability through IRN-CS-PLGA-NPs when compared with IRN-S."( Improvement of oral efficacy of Irinotecan through biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles through in vitro and in vivo investigations.
Ahmad, N; Ahmad, R; Alam, MA; Jalees Ahmad, F; Umar, S, 2018
)
0.76
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" Dabigatran etexilate (DABE), an oral anticoagulant and substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is poorly absorbed and exhibits low bioavailability in humans."( Irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal damage impairs the absorption of dabigatran etexilate.
Akiyoshi, T; Hattori, T; Imaoka, A; Ohtani, H, 2019
)
1.96
" However, it is unclear if the enteric bioavailability of SN-38 is mostly dependent on luminal SN-38 concentrations."( Irinotecan-mediated diarrhea is mainly correlated with intestinal exposure to SN-38: Critical role of gut Ugt.
Gao, S; Ghose, R; Gong, X; Hu, M; Li, L; Liu, Z; Qi, X; Song, W; Sun, R; Wang, Y; Zhu, L, 2020
)
2
"Liposomal formulations may improve the solubility and bioavailability of drugs potentially increasing their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier."( Nanoliposomal Irinotecan and Metronomic Temozolomide for Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: BrUOG329, A Phase I Brown University Oncology Research Group Trial.
Baekey, J; Carcieri, A; Cielo, D; Disano, D; Donnelly, J; Elinzano, H; MacKinnon, K; Mohler, A; Robison, J; Safran, H; Sturtevant, A; Toms, S; Vatketich, J; Wood, R, 2021
)
0.98
" However, the limited oral bioavailability of irinotecan poses a problem for its oral delivery."( Possible roles of intestinal P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A on the limited oral absorption of irinotecan.
Arimori, K; Furuya, Y; Hidaka, M; Kawano, Y; Ono, H; Yamasaki, K, 2021
)
1.1
" Indeed, the oral bioavailability of irinotecan was increased when verapamil was orally pre-administered."( Possible roles of intestinal P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A on the limited oral absorption of irinotecan.
Arimori, K; Furuya, Y; Hidaka, M; Kawano, Y; Ono, H; Yamasaki, K, 2021
)
1.11
" Although curcumin is known to have anti-tumor, hepatoprotective, and hypoglycemic-like actions, its low water solubility, oral absorption, and bioavailability impede its therapeutic uses."( Anti-cancer activity of amorphous curcumin preparation in patient-derived colorectal cancer organoids.
Abugomaa, A; Ayame, H; Elbadawy, M; Hayashi, K; Hayashi, SM; Hazama, S; Ishihara, Y; Kaneda, M; Nagano, H; Nakajima, M; Sasaki, K; Shibutani, M; Shinohara, Y; Suzuki, N; Takenouchi, H; Tsunedomi, R; Usui, T; Yamawaki, H, 2021
)
0.62
" Pharmacokinetic study of CPT11-loaded PC90C10P0 administered orally revealed an absolute bioavailability (FAB, vs."( CPT11 with P-glycoprotein/CYP 3A4 dual-function inhibitor by self-nanoemulsifying nanoemulsion combined with gastroretentive technology to enhance the oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy against pancreatic adenocarcinomas.
Chen, LC; Cheng, WJ; Hsieh, CM; Hung, MT; Lin, HL; Lin, SY; Sheu, MT, 2021
)
0.62
"AZD6738 (ceralasertib) is a potent and selective orally bioavailable inhibitor of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase."( ATR Inhibitor AZD6738 (Ceralasertib) Exerts Antitumor Activity as a Monotherapy and in Combination with Chemotherapy and the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib.
Bargh-Dawson, H; Brown, E; Gerrard, J; Hughes, AM; Jones, GN; Lau, A; O'Connor, MJ; Odedra, R; Wallez, Y; Wijnhoven, PWG; Wilson, Z; Young, LA, 2022
)
0.72
" Future studies should focus not only on developing other active molecules but also on improving the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of potent synthetic derivatives."( The design and discovery of topoisomerase I inhibitors as anticancer therapies.
Alonso, C; Martín-Encinas, E; Palacios, F; Selas, A, 2022
)
0.72
" Relative to the small-size nanocarrier, the size-transformable counterpart appeared to restrict the mucociliary and absorption clearances from the lung and the clearance from the tumor interstitium to circulation, leading to increases in lung and tumor bioavailability of SN38 by 58."( Pulmonary delivery of size-transformable nanoparticles improves tumor accumulation and penetration for chemo-sonodynamic combination therapy.
Chen, W; Cong, Z; Ge, D; Liao, Y; Ma, S; Wei, J; Yang, F, 2022
)
0.72
" However, the poor water solubility and bioavailability of SN38 constrained its clinical application."( Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel SN38-glucose conjugate for colorectal cancer treatment.
Chen, Y; Du, C; Jiang, X; Li, S; Luo, Y; Wang, Y; Wu, L; Xie, Y; Zhang, R, 2023
)
0.91
" On the one hand, the low solubility of anticancer drugs may lead to a decrease in the absorption rate of anticancer drugs, poor treatment effect, and even death in severe cases."( Study on the solubilization effect of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin based on molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation.
Gao, F; Guo, J; Li, X; Wang, T; Wu, M; Zhang, F, 2023
)
0.91
" The oral bioavailability of CEX significantly decreased to 76% of that in control rats."( Irinotecan-induced gastrointestinal damage alters the expression of peptide transporter 1 and absorption of cephalexin in rats.
Akiyoshi, T; Hattori, T; Imaoka, A; Ohtani, H, 2023
)
2.35
" Inhibition of intestinal hCES2A can alleviate irinotecan-induced gut toxicity and modulate the oral bioavailability of hCES2A-substrate drugs."( New bysspectin A derivatives as potent inhibitors of human carboxylesterase 2A.
Ge, G; Jiao, X; Li, W; Lin, S; Liu, X; Ma, B; Song, Y; Wu, Y; Xie, P; Zhang, Y; Zhu, G, 2023
)
1.17
"P-glycoprotein (Pgp) plays a pivotal role in drug bioavailability and multi-drug resistance development."( Drug-Induced Conformational Dynamics of P-Glycoprotein Underlies the Transport of Camptothecin Analogs.
Bartlett, MG; King, GM; Mensah, GAK; Roberts, AG; Schaefer, KG, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

The marked variability of irinotecan (Ir) clearance warrants individualized dosing based on hepatic drug handling. Verapamil (25mg/kg) was administered orally 2h before irinOTecan oral or intravenous dosing in female Wistar rats. The EWG found adequate evidence of a significantly higher rate of tumor response to standard irinotsecan dosing.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" The cumulative biliary and urinary excretion of radioactivity after dosage of rats with irinotecan were 62."( Identification of the metabolites of irinotecan, a new derivative of camptothecin, in rat bile and its biliary excretion.
Atsumi, R; Hakusui, H; Suzuki, W, 1991
)
0.78
" The responding patients were treated at a dosage of 100 mg/m2 or more."( [A phase I study of weekly administration of CPT-11 in lung cancer].
Fukuoka, M; Furue, H; Hara, N; Hara, Y; Hasegawa, K; Negoro, S; Niitani, H; Taguchi, T, 1990
)
0.28
" These results strongly suggest that Bayesian estimation combined with only two optimally timed samples accurately predicts the AUC of CPT-11 and should be useful for implementing adaptive control dosing for monitoring CPT-11 systemic exposure in patients with cancer."( Efficient sampling strategies for forecasting pharmacokinetic parameters of irinotecan (CPT-11): implication for area under the concentration-time curve monitoring.
Arioka, H; Eguchi, K; Karato, A; Lieberman, R; Nakashima, H; Nomura, N; Ohmatsu, H; Shinkai, T; Shiraishi, J; Tamura, T, 1995
)
0.52
" Total body clearance did not vary with increased dosage (mean = 14."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered daily for three consecutive days every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Catimel, G; Chabot, GG; Clavel, M; Cote, C; Dumortier, A; Engel, C; Gouyette, A; Guastalla, JP; Mahjoubi, M; Mathieu-Boué, A, 1995
)
0.56
" In combination therapy, half of the single dosage of each agent was used."( Enhanced antitumor efficacy of a combination of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, and cisplatin against human lung tumor xenografts.
Itoh, K; Kudoh, S; Kusunoki, Y; Masuda, N; Matsui, K; Morino, H; Nakagawa, K; Negoro, S; Takada, M; Takifuji, N, 1993
)
0.29
" To clarify the pharmacokinetic difference between CPT-11 and SN-38, the plasma levels, tissue distribution and excretion of SN-38 were investigated after dosing rats with 14C-labeled SN-38."( Pharmacokinetics of SN-38 [(+)-(4S)-4,11-diethyl-4,9-dihydroxy-1H- pyrano[3',4':6,7]-indolizino[1,2-b]quinoline-3,14(4H,12H)-dione], an active metabolite of irinotecan, after a single intravenous dosing of 14C-SN-38 to rats.
Atsumi, R; Hakusui, H; Okazaki, O, 1995
)
0.49
" The recommended dosage for phase II trial is 100 mg/m2 administered in 1 hour perfusion, every 21 days."( [Taxotere (docetaxel) and CPT 11 (irinotecan): phase I trials].
Armand, JP; Couteau, C; Goncalves, E; Terret, C; Yakendji, K, 1996
)
0.57
" The optimal dosage and schedule was 40 mg kg-1 daily for 5 days."( Therapeutic activity of CPT-11, a DNA-topoisomerase I inhibitor, against peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour and neuroblastoma xenografts.
Ardouin, P; Bénard, J; Bissery, MC; Boland, I; Bressac-de-Paillerets, B; Gouyette, A; Gyergyay, F; Morizet, J; Terrier-Lacombe, MJ; Vassal, G; Vénuat, AM, 1996
)
0.29
" This review details the rationale for the dosage schedule of CPT-11 selected for phase II studies, based on the results of 3 European phase I dose-escalating trials in patients with solid tumours."( Rationale for the dosage and schedule of CPT-11 (irinotecan) selected for phase II studies, as determined by European phase I studies.
Abigerges, D; Armand, JP; Catimel, G; Clavel, M; Extra, YM; Marty, M, 1996
)
0.55
"CPT-11 350 mg/m2 administered as an intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks was chosen for further evaluation in early phase II studies, since this dosage regimen allowed the highest dose intensity with the least toxicity and was convenient for outpatient use."( Rationale for the dosage and schedule of CPT-11 (irinotecan) selected for phase II studies, as determined by European phase I studies.
Abigerges, D; Armand, JP; Catimel, G; Clavel, M; Extra, YM; Marty, M, 1996
)
0.55
" Further studies are ongoing to define the optimum dosage schedule for CPT-11 and to assess the utility of CPT-11 as a single agent in second-line therapy, or combined with 5-FU and other anticancer agents as first-line therapy."( Current status of colorectal cancer: CPT-11 (irinotecan), a therapeutic innovation.
Cunningham, D, 1996
)
0.55
" A dose-response effect for CPT-11 activity has been noted in the human tumour cloning assay."( Future directions for clinical research with CPT-11 (irinotecan).
von Hoff, D, 1996
)
0.54
" Studies are ongoing to define fully optimum dosage schedules of CPT-11/5-FU combinations, and some of these schedules will soon enter phase II and III clinical trials."( CPT-11 (irinotecan) and 5-fluorouracil: a promising combination for therapy of colorectal cancer.
Khayat, D; Saltz, L; Shimada, Y, 1996
)
0.73
" In replicate experiments, CPT-11 was given at a dosage of 40 mg/kg per dose via intraperitoneal injection in 10% dimethylsulfoxide on days 1-5 and 8-12, which is the dosage lethal to 10% of treated animals."( Therapeutic efficacy of the topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-(4-[1-piperidino]-1-piperidino)-carbonyloxy-camptothecin against pediatric and adult central nervous system tumor xenografts.
Bigner, DD; Elion, GB; Friedman, HS; Hare, CB; Houghton, JA; Houghton, PJ; Keir, S; Marcelli, SL, 1997
)
0.3
" CPT-11 clearly retained its anti-tumor activity at a lower dosage (27 mg kg-1 day-1)."( Potent therapeutic activity of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its schedule dependency in medulloblastoma xenografts in nude mice.
Bissery, MC; Boland, I; Gouyette, A; Kalifa, C; Lellouch-Tubiana, A; Morizet, J; Sainte-Rose, C; Santos, A; Terrier-Lacombe, MJ; Vassal, G, 1997
)
0.58
" In addition, treatment with TJ-14 accelerated the healing of the intestinal tract injured by repeated dosing of CPT-11 and inhibited significantly the increase of colonic prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) which is closely related to the onset of diarrhea."( Preventive effects of Hange-shashin-to on irinotecan hydrochloride-caused diarrhea and its relevance to the colonic prostaglandin E2 and water absorption in the rat.
Aburada, M; Hayakawa, T; Kamataki, T; Kase, Y; Komatsu, Y, 1997
)
0.56
" The most common adverse events are well characterized and are reversible upon treatment discontinuation or dosage reduction."( Irinotecan hydrochloride: drug profile and nursing implications of a topoisomerase I inhibitor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Berg, D, 1998
)
1.74
" Phase I studies of irinotecan conducted in Europe, Japan and the US have provided useful information on optimal dosage and scheduling, as well as thorough evaluation of the toxicity profile of the drug."( A risk-benefit assessment of irinotecan in solid tumours.
Rowinsky, EK; Siu, LL, 1998
)
0.91
" Raltitrexed, a thymidylate synthase inhibitor, offers similar antitumoral activity together with a tolerability in comparison to standard 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy and its simple dosage schedule also contributes to better quality of life."( [Drug clinics. How I treat. II. Therapeutic approaches to metastatic colorectal cancer].
Bours, V; Fillet, G; Jerusalem, G, 1998
)
0.3
" This review showed toxicities to be fairly consistent across dosing schedules, although the severity and extent of diarrhea and neutropenia differed somewhat."( Irinotecan: a review of the initial phase I trials.
Eckhardt, SG, 1998
)
1.74
" These alternative dosing schedules may facilitate integration of irinotecan into combination chemotherapy and combined-modality treatment regimens."( Alternative dosing schedules for irinotecan.
Drengler, RL; Eckhardt, SG; Hammond, L; Kuhn, JG; Miller, LL; Petit, RG; Rothenberg, ML; Rowinsky, EK; Schaaf, LJ; Villalona-Calero, MA; Von Hoff, DD, 1998
)
0.82
" The panel agreed that further data from a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored intergroup trial is required to determine the optimal dosage of octreotide and its cost in the treatment of cancer."( Recommended guidelines for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea.
Benson, AB; Catalano, R; Engelking, C; Field, M; Kornblau, SM; Mitchell, E; Rubin, J; Trotta, P; Vokes, E; Wadler, S, 1998
)
0.3
" Dosage and administration, status of clinical application, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and drug interactions are discussed."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of camptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors.
Beijnen, JH; Herben, VM; Schellens, JH; Ten Bokkel Huinink, WW, 1998
)
0.3
" Treatment-related side effects not only decrease the patient's quality of life, they also may compromise treatment efficacy by necessitating dosage reductions or interruptions in therapy."( Managing the side effects of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.
Berg, D, 1998
)
0.3
" Our hypothesis is that the camptothecins require a prolonged schedule of administration given continuously at low doses or frequent intermittent dosing schedules to be most effective."( Camptothecins: a review of their development and schedules of administration.
Muggia, FM; O'Leary, J, 1998
)
0.3
" The observation that most tumor responses were seen at the highest doses administered in phase I trials suggest a dose-response relationship with this drug."( [Irinotecan pharmacokinetics].
Canal, P; Chabot, GG; Lokiec, F; Robert, J, 1998
)
1.21
"Grade 4 delayed diarrhea was the DLT at the 80 mg/m2/d dosage in patients younger than 65 years of age and at the 66 mg/m2/d dosage in patients 65 or older."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of oral irinotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors.
Drengler, RL; Elfring, GL; Hammond, LA; Hodges, S; Kraynak, MA; Kuhn, JG; Locker, PK; Miller, LL; Rodriguez, GI; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Staton, BA; Stephenson, JA; Villalona-Calero, MA; Von Hoff, DD, 1999
)
0.57
"The MTD and recommended phase II dosage for oral CPT-11 is 66 mg/m2/d in patients younger than 65 years of age and 50 mg/m2/d in patients 65 or older, administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of oral irinotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors.
Drengler, RL; Elfring, GL; Hammond, LA; Hodges, S; Kraynak, MA; Kuhn, JG; Locker, PK; Miller, LL; Rodriguez, GI; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Staton, BA; Stephenson, JA; Villalona-Calero, MA; Von Hoff, DD, 1999
)
0.57
" Four patients were assigned to different dosage levels, and drug toxicity was evaluated for the first 2 cycles."( Phase I study of a combination of irinotecan and ifosfamide in advanced primary lung cancer.
Gohara, R; Ichiki, M; Kawayama, T; Kinoshita, M; Mitui, T; Oizumi, K; Okubo, Y; Rikimaru, T, 1999
)
0.58
" The initial irinotecan dosage of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks was modifiable according to toxicity."( Results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Early Clinical Studies Group phase II trial of first-line irinotecan in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Chauvergne, J; Chevallier, B; Dieras, V; Fargeot, P; Fumoleau, P; Krakowski, Y; Lentz, MA; Lhommé, C; Matthieu-Boué, A; Mignard, D; Misset, JL; Rebattu, P; Roche, H; Van Glabbeke, M; Vennin, P, 1999
)
0.88
" The starting dosage was 12."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan administered as a low-dose, continuous intravenous infusion over 14 days in patients with malignant solid tumors.
Beijnen, JH; Gruia, G; Herben, VM; Schellens, JH; Swart, M; ten Bokkel Huinink, WW; Vernillet, L, 1999
)
0.58
" At a dosage of 10 mg/m(2)/d, 14-day administration resulted in grade 4 diarrhea in two of six patients and one episode of grade 4 vomiting occurred, whereas with 17-day administration, one episode of grade 3 nausea and two episodes of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea were observed in six patients."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan administered as a low-dose, continuous intravenous infusion over 14 days in patients with malignant solid tumors.
Beijnen, JH; Gruia, G; Herben, VM; Schellens, JH; Swart, M; ten Bokkel Huinink, WW; Vernillet, L, 1999
)
0.58
"The recommended dosage is 10 mg/m(2)/d for 14 days, repeated every 3 weeks."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan administered as a low-dose, continuous intravenous infusion over 14 days in patients with malignant solid tumors.
Beijnen, JH; Gruia, G; Herben, VM; Schellens, JH; Swart, M; ten Bokkel Huinink, WW; Vernillet, L, 1999
)
0.58
" Each 50% inhibitory concentration was calculated based on the dose-response curves."( Alteration of drug chemosensitivity caused by the adenovirus-mediated transfer of the wild-type p53 gene in human lung cancer cells.
Hara, N; Nakanishi, Y; Osaki, S; Pei, XH; Takayama, K; Ueno, H, 2000
)
0.31
" CPT-11 has been evaluated using a variety of dosing schedules."( [CPT-11 (irinotecan)--evidence from molecular and pharmacological studies and clinical applications].
Ishikawa, N; Isobe, T; Oguri, T, 2000
)
0.72
" The study design was based on the hypothesis that the non-overlapping toxicities of a 3-drug combination of irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11), carboplatin (Paraplatin), and paclitaxel (Taxol) would allow them to be dosed at recommended or standard doses, respectively."( Phase I/II trial of irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
Israel, VP; Miller, L; Natale, RB; Sandler, A; Socinski, M, 2000
)
0.84
" The ongoing phase II portion of the study is restricted to previously untreated patients who will receive at least one cycle of either cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide followed by irinotecan at 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel at 50 mg/m2 dosed once weekly for 3 weeks."( Phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with SCLC.
Rushing, DA, 2000
)
0.79
" Maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) for the topotecan and irinotecan combination was defined as that which permitted 4 weeks of topotecan and irinotecan administration with G-CSF at or near the dose intensity reported for each single agent."( Phase I clinical trial of weekly combined topotecan and irinotecan.
Lokich, J, 2001
)
0.81
"To investigate the excretion of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) and its active metabolite, SN-38, into the gastrointestinal lumen via the biliary and/or intestinal membrane route after dosing with lactone and carboxylate forms of CPT-11, and to evaluate the toxic and antitumor effects of the two forms."( Excretion into gastrointestinal tract of irinotecan lactone and carboxylate forms and their pharmacodynamics in rodents.
Arimori, K; Kikuchi, M; Kumamoto, A; Kumazawa, E; Kuroki, N; Nakano, M; Tanoue, N; Tohgo, A, 2001
)
0.86
" dosing (60 mg/kg) with CPT-11 lactone and carboxylate forms for 4 days."( Excretion into gastrointestinal tract of irinotecan lactone and carboxylate forms and their pharmacodynamics in rodents.
Arimori, K; Kikuchi, M; Kumamoto, A; Kumazawa, E; Kuroki, N; Nakano, M; Tanoue, N; Tohgo, A, 2001
)
0.58
"The excretion of CPT-11 into bile was greater in dosing with CPT-11 carboxylate than that with its lactone form, whereas the exsorption across intestinal membrane was greater in dosing with CPT-11 lactone than that with its carboxylate form."( Excretion into gastrointestinal tract of irinotecan lactone and carboxylate forms and their pharmacodynamics in rodents.
Arimori, K; Kikuchi, M; Kumamoto, A; Kumazawa, E; Kuroki, N; Nakano, M; Tanoue, N; Tohgo, A, 2001
)
0.58
"The decreased antitumor effect caused by dosing with the CPT-11 carboxylate form could be due to less accumulation in the tissue including tumor cells resulting from the rapid elimination of the form in the body."( Excretion into gastrointestinal tract of irinotecan lactone and carboxylate forms and their pharmacodynamics in rodents.
Arimori, K; Kikuchi, M; Kumamoto, A; Kumazawa, E; Kuroki, N; Nakano, M; Tanoue, N; Tohgo, A, 2001
)
0.58
"0 mg/kg per dose via intraperitoneal injection for a period of 10 consecutive days, which is the dosage lethal to 10% of treated animals."( Therapeutic activity of 7-[(2-trimethylsilyl)ethyl)]-20 (S)-camptothecin against central nervous system tumor-derived xenografts in athymic mice.
Bigner, DD; Friedman, HS; Hausheer, F; Keir, ST; Lawless, AA, 2001
)
0.31
"Regression models were developed based on data from a phase I clinical trial involving 34 patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies who received CPT-11 as a 90-min infusion on an every 3-week dosing schedule."( Limited sampling models for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38 glucuronide.
Atherton, P; Erlichman, C; Pitot, HC; Reid, J; Schaaf, L; Sloan, JA, 2001
)
0.31
"To evaluate relationships between various body-size measures and irinotecan (CPT-11) clearance and metabolism in cancer patients, and to provide future dosing recommendations for this agent."( Impact of body-size measures on irinotecan clearance: alternative dosing recommendations.
de Jonge, MJ; Mathijssen, RH; Nooter, K; Sparreboom, A; Stoter, G; Verweij, J, 2002
)
0.84
" These findings provide a rationale for the conduct of a comparative phase III study between BSA-based dosing and flat or fixed dosing of CPT-11."( Impact of body-size measures on irinotecan clearance: alternative dosing recommendations.
de Jonge, MJ; Mathijssen, RH; Nooter, K; Sparreboom, A; Stoter, G; Verweij, J, 2002
)
0.6
"These results indicate that AUC-based dosing of carboplatin is still rational in combination chemotherapy."( Phase I/II and pharmacologic study of irinotecan and carboplatin for patients with lung cancer.
Ando, M; Ando, Y; Hasegawa, Y; Ikeda, T; Minami, H; Saka, H; Sakai, S; Sato, M; Sekido, Y; Shimokata, K; Watanabe, A; Yamamoto, M, 2001
)
0.58
" The large variation in the UGT activity being related to the genetic status would warrant pharmacogenetic-guided dosing of irinotecan."( Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan.
Ando, Y; Hasegawa, Y; Ichiki, M; Shimokata, K; Sugiyama, T; Ueoka, H, 2002
)
0.76
" Plasma samples were obtained during the first 24 hours after initial dosing to determine the total concentrations (lactone + carboxylate forms) of CPT-11; of the active metabolite SN-38; and of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G)."( Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every two weeks.
Eckhardt, SG; Elfring, GL; Hammond, LA; Hodges, S; Kuhn, JG; Locker, PK; Miller, LL; Petit, RG; Rinaldi, DA; Rodriguez, GI; Rothenberg, ML; Schaaf, LJ; Sharma, A; Villalona-Calero, MA; von Hoff, DD, 2001
)
0.56
" Prediction of the drug sensitivity of each patient and cell kill kinetics of the drug may improve the outcome of treatment and avoid unnecessary dosing of the drug."( Prediction of cell kill kinetics of anticancer agents using the collagen gel droplet embedded-culture drug sensitivity test.
Komiyama, M; Mori, T; Ohnishi, M; Okada, H; Tsutsui, A; Yabushita, H,
)
0.13
" However, the optimum dosing schedule remains to be determined."( Irinotecan hydrochloride for the treatment of recurrent and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single institution experience.
Aiba, K; Fujiwara, K; Horikoshi, N; Ito, Y; Mizunuma, N; Omachi, K; Saotome, T; Sugiyama, K; Takahashi, S, 2002
)
1.76
" CPT-11 dosing (10 mg/kg), and bile samples were collected."( Biliary transport of irinotecan and metabolites in normal and P-glycoprotein-deficient mice.
Bingham, CM; Hossfeld, DK; Iyer, L; Mayer, U; Ramírez, J; Ratain, MJ; Shepard, DR, 2002
)
0.63
" These results suggest that CPT-11 has activity against recurrent malignant glioma using a dosing regimen of 300 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks showing limited toxicity."( Irinotecan treatment for recurrent malignant glioma using an every-3-week regimen.
Cloughesy, TF; Elfring, GL; Filka, E; Friedman, H; Kabbinavar, F; Miller, LL; Nelson, G, 2002
)
1.76
"25 mg kg(-1) per day) at one of six dosing times expressed in hours after light onset (3, 7, 11, 15, 19 or 23 hours after light onset)."( Circadian optimisation of irinotecan and oxaliplatin efficacy in mice with Glasgow osteosarcoma.
Bissery, MC; D'Attino, RM; Filipski, E; Garufi, C; Granda, TG; Lévi, F; Terzoli, E; Vrignaud, P, 2002
)
0.61
" As a result, both the host tolerance and antitumor efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP), like 30 other anticancer drugs, vary largely according to the dosing time in laboratory rodents."( Chronotherapy of colorectal cancer.
Giacchetti, S, 2002
)
0.31
" Further detailed pharmacokinetic studies of irinotecan in patients receiving concomitant therapy with enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants are required so that rational dosing recommendations can be provided for this patient population."( Influence of phenytoin on the disposition of irinotecan: a case report.
Berg, S; Bernstein, M; Blaney, SM; Cherrick, I; Kuttesch, N; Murry, DJ; Salama, V, 2002
)
0.83
" A median of 78%/75% of the planned dosage of CPT-11/cisplatin was delivered."( Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CPT-11 and cisplatin downstages locally advanced gastric cancer.
Hayek, M; Hochster, H; Marcus, SG; Muggia, F; Newman, E; Potmesil, M; Sewak, S; Sorich, J; Yee, H,
)
0.13
" infusion at a dosage of 20 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days of 2 consecutive weeks."( Altered irinotecan pharmacokinetics in pediatric high-grade glioma patients receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy.
Bowers, DC; Chintagumpala, MM; Crews, KR; Fouladi, M; Gajjar, A; Heideman, RL; Houghton, PJ; Jones-Wallace, D; Stewart, CF; Thompson, SJ, 2002
)
0.75
" One patient receiving EIAs experienced grade 3 diarrhea when the dosage of irinotecan was increased to 60 mg/m(2)/day."( Altered irinotecan pharmacokinetics in pediatric high-grade glioma patients receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy.
Bowers, DC; Chintagumpala, MM; Crews, KR; Fouladi, M; Gajjar, A; Heideman, RL; Houghton, PJ; Jones-Wallace, D; Stewart, CF; Thompson, SJ, 2002
)
0.98
" Serial plasma, urine, and feces samples were obtained up to 500 hours after dosing and analyzed for irinotecan, metabolites (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin [SN-38], SN-38 glucuronide [SN-38G], and APC), and ketoconazole by high-performance liquid chromatography."( Modulation of irinotecan metabolism by ketoconazole.
de Bruijn, P; Kehrer, DF; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J, 2002
)
0.89
" Three of 7 (43%) patients treated with irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d had course 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defining maximum tolerated dosage (MTD)."( Phase I clinical trial of irinotecan with oral capecitabine in patients with gastrointestinal and other solid malignancies.
Baker, C; Chun, HG; Fehn, K; Goel, S; Hoffman, A; Hopkins, U; Jhawer, M; Landau, L; Makower, D; Mani, S; Rajdev, L; Wadler, S, 2002
)
0.88
") dosing of MMI-166 at 200 mg/kg starting 1 day after tumor inoculation led to a significantly prolonged survival effect by inhibiting liver metastasis of C-1H tumor cells."( Augmented anti-metastatic efficacy of a selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, MMI-166, in combination with CPT-11.
Hojo, K; Maekawa, R; Maki, H; Sawada, TY; Tanaka, H; Yoshioka, T, 2002
)
0.31
" The difference in plasma esterase activity between 0 hr and 20 hr after HU injection was regarded as the mechanism underlying the dosing time-dependent difference of the SN-38 concentration."( Cell kinetics-dependent antitumor effect of irinotecan hydrochloride induced by the synchronizing effect of hydroxyurea: cell kinetics and dosing time.
Akagi, T; Higuchi, S; Inoue, K; Ishizaki, T; Kage, Y; Makinosumi, T; Ohdo, S; Taguchi, Y; Ushinohama, K; Yamauchi, A; Yukawa, E, 2003
)
0.58
" The present nanoparticle formation is suggested as a possibly useful dosage form of irinotecan against solid tumor."( Antitumor properties of irinotecan-containing nanoparticles prepared using poly(DL-lactic acid) and poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(propylene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene glycol).
Machida, Y; Onishi, H, 2003
)
0.85
" Pharmacogenomics is the study of inherited differences in interindividual drug disposition and effects, with the goal of selecting the optimal drug therapy and dosage for each patient."( Cancer pharmacogenomics: current and future applications.
McLeod, HL; Watters, JW, 2003
)
0.32
" Using the subrenal capsule assay (80 nude mice) (NM-SRCA), 9-AC was evaluated at both low and high dosage levels (0."( Camptothecin analogues and vinblastine in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: an in vivo study using a human orthotopic renal cancer xenograft.
El-Galley, R; Keane, TE; Sun, C,
)
0.13
" Clinical trials using weekly or every 3 weeks dosing of irinotecan have been completed."( Irinotecan in the treatment of glioma patients: current and future studies of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group.
Ames, M; Buckner, JC; Cha, S; Erlichman, C; Kaufmann, SH; Miller, LL; O'Fallon, JR; Reid, JM; Schaaf, LJ; Wright, K, 2003
)
2.01
" For the 6 patients who received EIAs but whose SN-38 areas under the concentration-time curve (AUCs) on Day 1 were below clinically significant levels, irinotecan dosage was increased, and subsequent pharmacokinetic studies were performed."( Effect of intrapatient dosage escalation of irinotecan on its pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients who have high-grade gliomas and receive enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy.
Bowers, DC; Chintagumpala, MM; Crews, KR; Gajjar, A; Jones-Wallace, D; Stewart, CF, 2003
)
0.78
"7 microg x h/ml) of CPT-11 after dosing with or without activated charcoal."( Influence of multiple dose activated charcoal on the disposition kinetics of irinotecan in rats.
Balram, C; Cheung, YB; Lee, EJ; Zhou, QY, 2002
)
0.54
" Because of unacceptable toxicity among the first 13 patients, dosing was reduced to docetaxel 40 mg/m2/d and irinotecan 100 mg/m2/d intravenously at 21-d intervals."( A phase II trial of docetaxel and CPT-11 in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric cardia.
Alberts, SR; Cha, SS; Goldberg, RM; Jatoi, A; Kardinal, CG; Mailliard, JA; Morton, RF; Nair, S; Rowland, KM; Sargen, D; Stella, PJ; Tirona, MT, 2002
)
0.53
"A phase I study of carboplatin (Paraplatin) administered in two different dosing schedules (single dose every 4 weeks and weekly dosing) in combination with weekly irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) was conducted in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced malignancies."( Phase I. Trial of irinotecan plus carboplatin in two dose schedules.
Burris, HA; Greco, FA; Hainsworth, JD; Jones, SF; Kuzur, ME; Miranda, FT; Raefsky, EA; White, MB; Willcutt, NT; Yardley, DA, 2003
)
0.85
" For example, Abdelbasit and Plackett proposed an optimal design assuming that the dose-response relationship follows some specified linear models."( Experimental design and sample size determination for testing synergism in drug combination studies based on uniform measures.
Fang, HB; Houghton, PJ; Tan, M; Tian, GL, 2003
)
0.32
" The dosage levels of TXT and CPT-11 were as follows: level 1, 30 mg/m(2) and 50 mg/m(2); level 2, 35 and 50 mg/m(2); level 3, 40 and 50 mg/m(2); level 4, 40 and 60 mg/m(2); and level 5, 50 and 60 mg/m(2)."( Biweekly administration regimen of docetaxel combined with CPT-11 in patients with inoperable or recurrent gastric cancer.
Gamoh, M; Kanamaru, R; Mitachi, Y; Saitoh, S; Sakata, Y; Sekikawa, K; Terashima, M; Yoshioka, T, 2003
)
0.32
" However, three patients at level 3 could not continue treatment without a decrease in the dosage after the second cycle."( Biweekly administration regimen of docetaxel combined with CPT-11 in patients with inoperable or recurrent gastric cancer.
Gamoh, M; Kanamaru, R; Mitachi, Y; Saitoh, S; Sakata, Y; Sekikawa, K; Terashima, M; Yoshioka, T, 2003
)
0.32
" A phase I trial of PG490-88 for solid tumors began recently and safety and optimal dosing data should accrue within the next 12 months."( PG490-88, a derivative of triptolide, causes tumor regression and sensitizes tumors to chemotherapy.
Chung, C; Fidler, JM; Gao, M; Li, K; Rosen, GD; Ross, JA; Wei, K, 2003
)
0.32
" Dose-response curves were interpolated to provide 50% lethal concentrations (LC(50))."( Ex vivo analysis of topotecan: advancing the application of laboratory-based clinical therapeutics.
Evans, SS; Harper, SM; Nagourney, RA; Radecki, S; Sommers, BL, 2003
)
0.32
" Patients with elevated AST, creatinine or prior pelvic radiation do not appear to have increased sensitivity to irinotecan, but the data are not adequate to support a specific dosing recommendation."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction or with prior pelvic radiation: CALGB 9863.
Budman, D; Byrd, J; Enders Klein, C; Fleming, G; Hohl, R; Hollis, D; Kastrissios, H; Leichman, CG; Marshall, J; Ramirez, J; Ratain, MJ; Rosner, GL; Venook, AP; Villalona, M, 2003
)
0.8
" No grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were manifested at any dosage level."( Weekly docetaxel for patients with platinum/paclitaxel/irinotecan-resistant relapsed ovarian cancer: a phase I study.
Hirano, T; Kubo, H; Masaki, K; Ogura, H; Taoka, H; Terauchi, F; Yamamoto, Y, 2003
)
0.57
" There was a moderate-to-fair relationship between CPT-11 dose and the area under the curve (AUC) for CPT-11 and APC over the 2, but no relationship dosage range of 350 to 800 mg/m between CPT-11 dose and the AUC for SN-38 or SN-38G."( Phase 1 trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with recurrent malignant glioma: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium study.
Chang, SM; Cloughesy, TF; Fine, HA; Fink, KL; Greenberg, HS; Hess, KR; Jaeckle, KA; Junck, L; Kuhn, J; Mehta, MP; Nicholas, MK; Prados, MD; Robins, HI; Schiff, D; Wen, PY; Yung, WK, 2004
)
0.66
" In this article, a minimal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model is presented, based on a system of ordinary differential equations that link the dosing regimen of a compound to the tumor growth in animal models."( Predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tumor growth kinetics in xenograft models after administration of anticancer agents.
Cammia, C; Croci, V; De Nicolao, G; Germani, M; Magni, P; Pesenti, E; Poggesi, I; Rocchetti, M; Simeoni, M, 2004
)
0.32
" Patients were treated with escalating doses of irinotecan with interval-modulated dosing of R115777 (continuously or on days 1-14, and repeated every 21 days)."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with R115777, a farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor.
de Bruijn, P; de Heus, G; de Jonge, MJ; Eskens, FA; Kehrer, DF; Klaren, A; Mathijssen, RH; Palmer, PA; Planting, AS; Sparreboom, A; Verhaeghe, T; Verheij, C; Verweij, J; Xie, R; Zhang, S, 2004
)
0.85
" Additional methods, including potential application of pharmacogenetic information, are needed to optimize irinotecan dosing and tailor therapy to individual patients."( Relationship of baseline serum bilirubin to efficacy and toxicity of single-agent irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Fuchs, CS; Kwok, A; McGovren, JP; Meyerhardt, JA; Ratain, MJ, 2004
)
0.76
" On the other hand, biliary excretion of CPT-11 and SN-38 was greater after dosing with the CPT-11 carboxylate form than that after the CPT-11 lactone form."( Biliary excretion of irinotecan and its metabolites.
Hirano, T; Iseki, K; Itagaki, S; Itoh, T; Sasaki, K; Takemoto, I, 2004
)
0.64
" The starting dosage of CPT-11 was 15 mg/m2 per day (days 1-3 and 8-10), and dosage-escalation increments of 5 mg/m2 per day were planned, with fixed dosages of carboplatin (250 mg/m2 per day, day 1) and dexamethasone (40 mg/body, days 1-3 and days 8-10)."( Phase I study of the combination of irinotecan hydrochloride, carboplatin, and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed or refractory malignant lymphoma.
Maeda, K; Okamura, S; Shibuya, T; Suzumiya, J; Suzushima, H; Tamura, K; Utsunomiya, A, 2004
)
0.6
"These findings suggest that flat-fixed dosing of irinotecan does not result in increased pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variability and could be safely used to supplant current dosing strategies based on BSA."( Flat-fixed dosing of irinotecan: influence on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability.
de Jong, FA; Mathijssen, RH; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J; Xie, R, 2004
)
0.9
" Dosage was reduced at any time if toxicity NCI CTC grade III/IV was observed."( Irinotecan plus folinic acid/continuous 5-fluorouracil as simplified bimonthly FOLFIRI regimen for first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Adami, B; Galle, PR; Heike, M; Hohl, H; Höhler, T; Klein, O; Moehler, M; Schroeder, M; Siebler, J; Steinmann, S; Teufel, A; Zanke, C, 2004
)
1.77
" The survival curves differed significantly as a function of the dosage and circadian time of drug administration by the D1-10 schedule, with 70% survival at 7 or 11 HALO and 51% at 19 or 23 HALO (p=0."( Circadian rhythm of irinotecan tolerability in mice.
Filipski, E; Lemaigre, G; Lévi, F; Liu, XH; Mahjoubi, M; Méry-Mignard, D, 2004
)
0.65
" Thirty-two patients with advanced refractory cancers (median age 64, 19 male) received 190 treatment courses at five dosing levels of irinotecan: 30 mg/m2 (n=6 patients), 60 (n=3), 90 (n=7), 120 (n=8) and 105 (n=8)."( Biweekly administration of 24-h infusion of irinotecan followed by a 1-h infusion of docetaxel: a phase I study.
Briasoulis, E; Fountzilas, G; Pavlidis, N; Pentheroudakis, G; Rammou, D; Timotheadou, H, 2004
)
0.79
" The cytotoxic activity of irofulven is augmented when combined with agents that interact with DNA topoisomerase I; however, none of the reported studies have used the protracted dosing schedule found to be active clinically in treatment of childhood cancers."( Enhanced antitumor activity of irofulven in combination with irinotecan in pediatric solid tumor xenograft models.
Billups, C; Bjornsti, MA; Houghton, PJ; Liang, H; Peterson, JK; Woo, MH, 2005
)
0.57
" We develop a maximum likelihood method based on the expectation/conditional maximization (ECM) algorithm to estimate the dose-response relationship while accounting for the informative censoring and the constraints of model parameters."( Repeated-measures models with constrained parameters for incomplete data in tumour xenograft experiments.
Fang, HB; Houghton, PJ; Tan, M; Tian, GL, 2005
)
0.33
" A low dosage of BAI was administered by using CPT-11 (40 mg/m2) + CDDP (40 mg/m2) as one shot, and was repeated (three and six times respectively) for the two cases."( [Evaluation of bronchial arterial infusion (BAI) for metastatic lung tumor from colorectal cancer].
Hayashi, N; Koshiishi, H; Koshiishi, Y; Okamura, T; Takahashi, E; Tamamoto, F; Yoshimura, T, 2004
)
0.32
" The first group was given tailored CPT-11, adjusting individual optimal dosage using toxicity-based grading as an index in combination with TS-1, and the second group was given standard TS-1 treatment."( [A randomized phase II clinical trial of tailored CPT-11 + TS-1 vs TS-1 in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric carcinoma as the first-line chemotherapy (JFMC31-0301)].
Kitajima, M; Kubota, T; Mai, M; Saji, S; Sakamoto, J; Takahashi, Y; Takeuchi, T; Toge, T, 2004
)
0.32
" The marked improvement in toxicity and tolerance with vitamin supplementation suggests the need to reexamine optimal dosing in pemetrexed combination schedules."( Pemetrexed in advanced colorectal cancer.
de Gramont, A; Louvet, C, 2004
)
0.32
" During the first cycle, grade 3 delayed diarrhea and grade 3 fever were the DLTs at the dosage of 80 mg/m(2)/day in three out of five patients."( Phase I pharmacokinetic, food effect, and pharmacogenetic study of oral irinotecan given as semisolid matrix capsules in patients with solid tumors.
Assadourian, S; de Jong, FA; de Jonge, MJ; Dumez, H; Eskens, FA; Lefebvre, P; Sanderink, GJ; Selleslach, J; Soepenberg, O; Sparreboom, A; Ter Steeg, J; Thomas, J; van Oosterom, AT; van Schaik, RH; Verweij, J, 2005
)
0.56
" This study assessed the optimal dosing strategy for irinotecan, along with treatment efficacy and safety."( Optimisation of irinotecan dose in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after 5-FU failure: results from a multinational, randomised phase II study.
Bleiberg, H; Borner, M; Dirix, L; Gonzalez Baron, M; Gruia, G; Joosens, E; Morant, R; Roth, A; Sibaud, D; Van Belle, S; Van Cutsem, E; Van Laethem, JL, 2005
)
0.92
"First, we determined the optimal dosing regimen in murine models."( Sequential treatment with irinotecan and doxifluridine: optimal dosing schedule in murine models and in a phase I study for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Fujimoto-Ouchi, K; Kato, T; Kikkawa, N; Mishima, H; Nishisho, I; Tanaka, Y; Tsujie, M; Tsujinaka, T; Yanagisawa, M, 2005
)
0.63
" Morbidity is a significant limitation of this procedure, usually related to the extent of surgery, and hematological toxicity, which is considered as dependent upon the chemotherapy dosage alone."( Impact of the extent and duration of cytoreductive surgery on postoperative hematological toxicity after intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia for peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Boige, V; Elias, D; Estphan, G; Laplanche, A; Malka, D; Pocard, M; Raynard, B, 2005
)
0.33
" Thus, the visual and chemical compatibility of irinotecan and epirubicin in the same infusion solution were investigated using both reference standards and pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Spectrophotometric investigation of the chemical compatibility of the anticancer drugs irinotecan-HCl and epirubicin-HCl in the same infusion solution.
Anilanmert, B; Ozdemir, FA; Pekin, M, 2005
)
0.81
" The carboplatin dosage was calculated by using the Chatelut formula."( A phase I study and pharmacologic evaluation of irinotecan and carboplatin for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma who previously received platinum-containing chemotherapy.
Fujiwara, Y; Kasamatsu, T; Katsumata, N; Tsunematsu, R; Yamada, T; Yamamoto, N; Yonemori, K, 2005
)
0.58
" Pharmacologic studies demonstrated that administration of the dosage estimated with the Chatelut formula instead of the Chatelut formula with adjustment for serum creatinine resulted in a slightly excessive dose of carboplatin."( A phase I study and pharmacologic evaluation of irinotecan and carboplatin for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma who previously received platinum-containing chemotherapy.
Fujiwara, Y; Kasamatsu, T; Katsumata, N; Tsunematsu, R; Yamada, T; Yamamoto, N; Yonemori, K, 2005
)
0.58
" With a standard dose of paclitaxel at 135 mg m(-2), the dosage of irinotecan was escalated at four levels: 75, 100, 125 and 150 mg m(-2); 125 mg m(-2) was established as the maximum tolerated dose; this dosage was administered to 46 patients."( Front-line paclitaxel and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II trial.
Antoniou, D; Armenaki, O; Dimitroulis, J; Grigoratou, T; Katis, C; Marosis, C; Michalopoulou, P; Stathopoulos, GP; Stathopoulos, J; Tsavdaridis, D, 2005
)
0.86
" Only BILT significantly influenced the pharmacokinetics but this effect was not considered as relevant for dosing adjustment."( Pharmacokinetic modelling of 5-FU production from capecitabine--a population study in 40 adult patients with metastatic cancer.
Lokiec, F; Rezaí, K; Urien, S, 2005
)
0.33
" We investigated efficacy and safety of the weekly dosing schedule of irinotecan."( The safety and efficacy of the weekly dosing of irinotecan for platinum- and taxanes-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.
Andoh, M; Fujiwara, Y; Katsumata, N; Kohno, T; Matsumoto, K; Shimizu, C; Yamanaka, Y; Yonemori, K, 2006
)
0.82
"The weekly dosing schedule of irinotecan seems to be effective and safe salvage chemotherapy regimen for platinum- and taxanes-resistant or refractory epithelial ovarian cancer."( The safety and efficacy of the weekly dosing of irinotecan for platinum- and taxanes-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.
Andoh, M; Fujiwara, Y; Katsumata, N; Kohno, T; Matsumoto, K; Shimizu, C; Yamanaka, Y; Yonemori, K, 2006
)
0.88
" In the high 5-FU group, seven of 14 patients (50%) received < or =80% of the planned chemotherapy dose during the first cycle due to dosage reductions whilst treatment delays occurred in 10/14 patients."( Cetuximab and irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/folinic acid is a safe combination for the first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor expressing metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Folprecht, G; Köhne, CH; Lutz, MP; Nolting, A; Pollert, P; Schöffski, P; Seufferlein, T, 2006
)
0.69
" Patients received CPT-11 and mitomycin-c at the dosage of 150 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15, and 8 mg/m2 on day 1, respectively, every 4 weeks."( Irinotecan (CPT-11) and mitomycin-C (MMC) as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a phase II study of the Gruppo Oncologico dell' Italia Meridionale (prot. 2106).
Battaglia, C; Colucci, G; Di Bisceglie, M; Gebbia, N; Gebbia, V; Giuliani, F; Maiello, E; Molica, S; Vinciarelli, G, 2005
)
1.77
" Eventually, this may help to truly individualize the dosing of this (and other) anti-cancer agent(s), using a personal genetic profile of the most relevant enzymes for every patient."( Role of pharmacogenetics in irinotecan therapy.
de Jong, FA; de Jonge, MJ; Mathijssen, RH; Verweij, J, 2006
)
0.63
" We have demonstrated from a rat model that intestinal beta-glucuronidase may play a key role in the development of CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea by the deconjugation of the luminal SN-38 glucuronide, and the elimination of the intestinal microflora by antibiotics or dosing of TJ-14, a Kampo medicine that contains beta-glucuronidase inhibitor baicalin, exerted a protective effect."( Optimal antidiarrhea treatment for antitumor agent irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11)-induced delayed diarrhea.
Hagiwara, T; Kamataki, T; Kumazawa, E; Nagai, E; Onose, S; Takasuna, K; Watanabe, K; Yoshida, S, 2006
)
0.59
" The treatment schedule modification, omitting the 5-FU dosing on day 8, considerably improved treatment compliance, reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, and asthenia."( Irinotecan, oxaliplatin plus bolus 5-fluorouracil and low dose folinic acid every 2 weeks: a feasibility study in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Bas, C; Bella, S; Chacon, M; Coppola, F; Escobar, E; Hidalgo, J; Korbenfeld, E; Martin, C; Martinez, J; Reale, M; Richardet, E; Senna, S; Smilovich, AM; Wasserman, E, 2006
)
1.78
"Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor highly effective for various cancers, has its dosage limited by diffuse mucosal damage with increased prostaglandin (PG) E(2)."( Phospholipid fatty acid composition and diamine oxidase activity of intestinal mucosa from rats treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) under vegetable oil-enriched diets: comparison between perilla oil and corn oil.
Aoyama, M; Fueda, Y; Kishimoto, K; Miyoshi, M; Ohata, A; Ohmae, K; Usami, M,
)
1.79
" The recommended dosage was set at 460 mg/m2 in 2 l/m2 of peritoneal instillation."( Heated intra-operative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin alone and in combination with intraperitoneal irinotecan: Pharmacologic studies.
Bonnay, M; Elias, D; Pocard, M; Raynard, B, 2006
)
0.55
" A reduction in irinotecan dosage or use of an alternative agent may be warranted in patients with risk factors for toxicity."( Individualizing chemotherapeutic treatment of colorectal cancer.
Crews, KR, 2006
)
0.68
" Extended dosing has met with early favourable results."( Exploiting the role of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) in cancer therapy.
Middleton, MR; Sabharwal, A, 2006
)
0.33
" However, the FDA decided that evidence indicates sufficient benefit to warrant informing prescribers, pharmacists and patients of the availability of pharmacogenetic tests and their possible role in the selection and dosing of these anticancer agents."( TPMT, UGT1A1 and DPYD: genotyping to ensure safer cancer therapy?
Maitland, ML; Ratain, MJ; Vasisht, K, 2006
)
0.33
" Fixing synergistic drug ratios in pharmaceutical carriers provides an avenue by which anticancer drug combinations can be optimized prospectively for maximum therapeutic activity during preclinical development and differs from current practice in which dosing regimens are developed empirically in late-stage clinical trials based on tolerability."( Ratiometric dosing of anticancer drug combinations: controlling drug ratios after systemic administration regulates therapeutic activity in tumor-bearing mice.
Bally, MB; Harasym, NL; Harasym, TO; Janoff, AS; Johnstone, SA; Mayer, LD; Ramsay, EC; Shew, CR; Tardi, PG, 2006
)
0.33
"The marked variability of irinotecan (Ir) clearance warrants individualized dosing based on hepatic drug handling."( Relationship of hepatic functional imaging to irinotecan pharmacokinetics and genetic parameters of drug elimination.
Clarke, SJ; Di Iulio, J; Ellis, A; Foo, K; Gurtler, V; Hicks, RJ; Hoskins, JM; Jefford, M; Michael, M; Milner, AD; Mitchell, PL; Scott, AM; Tebbut, NC; Thompson, M; Zalcberg, JR, 2006
)
0.89
" Based on the results of our previous phase I/II study in patients with gastric cancer, the dosage was established in consideration of safety for outpatient therapy."( [Irinotecan plus oral S-1 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer--biweekly IRIS regimen].
Asaka, M; Komatsu, Y; Kudo, M; Tateyama, M; Yuki, S, 2006
)
1.24
"In this study, we attempted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of decreasing dosage of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer."( Decreasing dosage of irinotecan, 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study.
Chueh, TC; Huang, JS; Lai, CH; Lan, YJ; Liaw, CC; Wang, CH; Yen, CL; You, YT,
)
0.67
"Twenty patients with rectal cancer (clinical Stage uT3-T4 or N+) received a standard dosing regimen of cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and 250 mg/m(2) on Days 8, 15, 22, and 29) and escalating doses of irinotecan and capecitabine according to phase I methods: dose level I, irinotecan 40 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 and capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) on Days 1-38; dose level II, irinotecan 40 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2); and dose level III, irinotecan 50 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2)."( Phase I trial of cetuximab in combination with capecitabine, weekly irinotecan, and radiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.
Dinter, D; Grobholz, R; Heeger, S; Hochhaus, A; Hofheinz, RD; Horisberger, K; Kähler, G; Kraus-Tiefenbacher, U; Post, S; Wenz, F; Willeke, F; Woernle, C, 2006
)
0.76
" Although in a recently reported, randomized trial it was found that a regimen of irinotecan once every 3 weeks was associated with a lower incidence of severe diarrhea than with weekly treatment with similar efficacy, there is no evidence in the literature that suggests the optimal dosing strategy for the drug, along with treatment efficacy and safety, following 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in elderly patients."( Single-agent irinotecan as second-line weekly chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Cordio, S; Rosati, G,
)
0.73
" Irinotecan's new labeling recommends that clinicians consider reducing the dosage of irinotecan in patients homozygous for UGT1A1*28."( Pharmacogenetics and irinotecan therapy.
Hahn, KK; Kolesar, JM; Wolff, JJ, 2006
)
1.56
" According to the dosage and schedule of irinotecan, efficacy and toxicity profiles showed subtle differences."( Three-week schedule of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
Ahn, JS; Ahn, MJ; Hong, YS; Hwang, IG; Lee, HR; Lee, J; Lee, SC; Lim, HY; Park, BB; Park, K; Park, S, 2006
)
0.91
" The initial dose of CPT-11 was 80 mg, and we thereafter made minor adjustments in the dosage depending on the occurrence of side effects."( [Successful CPT-11 treatment in a patient with pancreatic cancer associated with multiple liver metastases and chronic renal failure].
Fujioka, T; Hirashima, Y; Kitajima, K; Kumamoto, T; Murakami, K; Sugi, S, 2007
)
0.34
" Blood samples were obtained up to 55 hours after dosing and analyzed for irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38, SN-38G), respectively, or docetaxel."( Medicinal cannabis does not influence the clinical pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and docetaxel.
de Bruijn, P; de Jong, FA; Engels, FK; Kitzen, JJ; Loos, WJ; Mathijssen, RH; Mathot, RA; Sparreboom, A; Verweij, J, 2007
)
0.8
" Irinotecan was dosed initially at 30 mg/m2 per week for 7 weeks and was increased by 10 mg/m2 per week in three- to six-patient cohorts."( Phase I study of radical thoracic radiation, weekly irinotecan, and cisplatin in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Feigenberg, S; Huang, C; Langer, CJ; Litwin, S; Maiale, C; Millenson, M; Movsas, B; Nicoloau, N; Sherman, E; Somer, R; Treat, J, 2007
)
1.5
" Other dosing regimens were not as effective."( Velafermin improves gastrointestinal mucositis following irinotecan treatment in tumor-bearing DA rats.
Alvarez, E; Bowen, JM; Burns, J; Gibson, RJ; Keefe, DM; Logan, RM; Stringer, AM; Yeoh, AS, 2007
)
0.58
" Two sequential schema were used: Arm A fixed the dose of irinotecan at 100 mg/m(2) and escalated capecitabine in cohorts, and arm B fixed the dose of capecitabine at 750 mg/m(2) PO BID and escalated the dosage of irinotecan."( A Phase I dose-finding study using an innovative sequential biweekly schedule of irinotecan followed 24 hours later by capecitabine.
Allen, SL; Budman, DR; Fricano, M; Gonzales, A; Hirawat, S; Kolitz, J; Lichtman, SM; Villani, G,
)
0.6
" Repetitive dosing was feasible with prolonged disease stabilization in 8 patients."( A Phase I dose-finding study using an innovative sequential biweekly schedule of irinotecan followed 24 hours later by capecitabine.
Allen, SL; Budman, DR; Fricano, M; Gonzales, A; Hirawat, S; Kolitz, J; Lichtman, SM; Villani, G,
)
0.36
" The dose-response relationships for melphalan and irinotecan in individual samples showed great variability."( Heterogeneous activity of cytotoxic drugs in patient samples of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Glimelius, B; Graf, W; Grundmark, B; Larsson, R; Mahteme, H; Nygren, P; Påhlman, L; Tholander, B; von Heideman, A, 2008
)
0.6
" Therefore, UGT1A1 genotyping is not a useful prognostic indicator of severe toxicity for patients treated with this irinotecan dosage and schedule."( UGT1A1 promoter genotype correlates with SN-38 pharmacokinetics, but not severe toxicity in patients receiving low-dose irinotecan.
Billups, C; Fraga, CH; Furman, WL; Gajjar, A; Liu, T; McGregor, LM; O'Shaughnessy, MA; Owens, T; Panetta, JC; Rodriguez-Galindo, C; Stewart, CF; Throm, SL, 2007
)
0.76
" Results should be integrated in protocols for monitoring and assessment the dosage of drugs."( [Role of pharmacogenetics in chemotherapy of colorectal cancers].
Beauvillain, L; Bihannic, R; Bousquet, A; Burnat, P; Ceppa, F; Cremades, S; Fontan, E, 2007
)
0.34
" The SN-38 hypomicrons increased the solubility of SN-38 in water and were valuable for the development of the novel dosage form of SN-38."( [Preparation and characterization of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin-loaded hypomicron of amphiphilic block copolymer].
Luan, LB; Wu, QL, 2007
)
0.34
" Our data support the need for more prospective studies that evaluate the predictive value of UGT1A1 as well as UGT1A1-based dosing in patients receiving irinotecan."( Increased frequency of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 7/7 in patients experiencing severe irinotecan-induced toxicities.
Fakih, MG; Ross, ME; Starostik, P, 2007
)
0.75
" These dosing schedules resulted in significant effects on tumor vasculature, with decreased volume transfer constants, area under the curve, and permeability surface factor as well as increased gadolinium clearance after 30 days of treatment."( Investigation of two dosing schedules of vandetanib (ZD6474), an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, in combination with irinotecan in a human colon cancer xenograft model.
Ciardiello, F; Eckhardt, SG; Gustafson, DL; Henthorn, TK; Lockerbie, O; Long, M; Merz, A; Morrow, M; Serkova, NJ; Troiani, T, 2007
)
0.53
" SLM was given orally twice daily (BID) for one week (loading) followed by continuous once daily (QD) dosing (maintenance)."( A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of selenomethionine in combination with a fixed dose of irinotecan in solid tumors.
Badmaev, V; Brady, W; Creaven, PJ; Fakih, MG; Pendyala, L; Prey, JD; Ross, ME; Rustum, YM; Smith, PF, 2008
)
0.57
" The dosage of FOLFOX 4 was reduced after three courses due to neutropenia and diarrhea."( [A patient with recurrent rectal cancer in whom pulmonary metastasis disappeared by FOLFOX 4 therapy].
Fujisawa, M; Ishibiki, Y; Ishiyama, S; Kitabatake, T; Kojima, K; Machida, M; Nakayama, Y; Nitta, S; Ono, S; Shinjou, K; Urao, M, 2007
)
0.34
" Although select patients may benefit from treatment, the overall risk:benefit ratio is unfavorable, and other dosing regimens and therapeutic options should be explored in this setting."( Excess toxicity associated with docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: results of a phase II study.
Bergsland, EK; Dito, E; Ko, AH; Schillinger, B; Tempero, MA; Venook, AP, 2008
)
0.6
" In the event of progressive disease, the dosage was increased for subsequent cycles."( [Irinotecan plus gemcitabine(IRINOGEM)in the treatment of biliary malignancies].
Hatakeyama, K; Muneoka, K; Sakata, J; Sasaki, M; Shirai, Y; Toshima, M; Wakai, T, 2008
)
1.26
" Further study is needed for a selection of suitable chemotherapeutic regimens, an optimal dosage of each drug and timing of hemodialysis."( [Carboplatin and CPT-11 chemotherapy in a hemodialysis patient with small-cell lung cancer].
Baba, M; Hayashi, N; Kakimoto, Y; Koshiishi, H; Koshiishi, Y; Minami, T; Okamura, T; Takahashi, E; Yasui, T, 2007
)
0.34
" The currently approved dosing regimen for cetuximab is a 400-mg/m(2) initial dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly."( Administration of cetuximab every 2 weeks in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: an effective, more convenient alternative to weekly administration?
Cervantes, A; Pfeiffer, P; Tabernero, J, 2008
)
0.35
" A dosage of 335 mg/m2/day of UFT was given perorally on daily schedule."( Metronomic chemotherapy using weekly low-dosage CPT-11 and UFT as postoperative adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer at high risk to recurrence.
Akagi, Y; Fukushima, T; Ishibashi, N; Mori, S; Murakami, H; Ogata, Y; Shirouzu, K; Ushijima, M, 2007
)
0.34
"Recent progress in pharmacogenetic research has made "personalized medicine" a reality, where a suitable drug at the appropriate dosage is prescribed based on individual genetic factors."( [Irinotecan pharmacogenetics in Japanese cancer patients: roles of UGT1A1*6 and *28].
Minami, H; Sai, K; Sawada, J, 2008
)
1.26
" Finally, the application of a 3-weekly high-dose treatment regimen with a 20% reduced dosage compared with the low-dose weekly irinotecan regimen in patients with UGT1A1 7/7 genotype was less expensive and is more convenient for the patient."( Cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1 genotyping in second-line, high-dose, once every 3 weeks irinotecan monotherapy treatment of colorectal cancer.
Kos, M; Mrhar, A; Obradovic, M, 2008
)
0.77
" Future studies should combine pharmacogenetics with clinical determinants such as performance status and co-medication as to predict irinotecan toxicity and to develop predefined dosing algorithms."( Clinical and pharmacogenetic factors associated with irinotecan toxicity.
Gelderblom, H; Guchelaar, HJ; Kweekel, D, 2008
)
0.8
" Irinotecan labeling recommends testing for the UGT1A1*28 allele and reducing irinotecan dosing in patients who are positive to reduce the likelihood of dose-limiting neutropenia only, but not diarrhea."( Irinotecan and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 pharmacogenetics: to test or not to test, that is the question.
Deeken, JF; Marshall, JL; Slack, R, 2008
)
2.7
" When administered concurrently with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, the dosage must be increased to compensate for enhanced cytochrome CY3A4/5 enzyme activity."( Experience with irinotecan for the treatment of malignant glioma.
Desjardins, A; Friedman, HS; Reardon, DA; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2009
)
0.7
"The aims of this trial were to assess the safety and efficacy of two different dosing schedules of irinotecan (CPT-11) in recurrent glioma patients, to assess irinotecan pharmacokinetics in patients on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) and steroids, and to correlate with toxicity and response to treatment."( Phase II trial of two different irinotecan schedules with pharmacokinetic analysis in patients with recurrent glioma: North Central Cancer Treatment Group results.
Ames, MM; Buckner, JC; Felten, SJ; Galanis, E; Jaeckle, KA; Nikcevich, DA; Reid, JM; Santisteban, M; Scheithauer, BW; Wiesenfeld, M; Wu, W, 2009
)
0.85
"The EGAPP Working Group (EWG) found no intervention trials showing that targeted dosing of irinotecan based on UGT1A1 genotyping could reduce the rates of two specific adverse drug events, severe (Grade 3-4) neutropenia or diarrhea."( Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can UGT1A1 genotyping reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan?
, 2009
)
0.77
" The EWG found adequate evidence of a significantly higher rate of tumor response to standard irinotecan dosing among individuals with the genotype at highest risk of adverse drug events (*28/*28)."( Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can UGT1A1 genotyping reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan?
, 2009
)
0.77
" Preliminary modeling suggests that, even if targeted dosing were to be highly effective, it is not clear that benefits (reduced adverse drug events) outweigh harms (unresponsive tumors)."( Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: can UGT1A1 genotyping reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with irinotecan?
, 2009
)
0.55
" Verapamil (25mg/kg) was administered orally 2h before irinotecan oral (80 mg/kg) or intravenous (20mg/kg) dosing in female Wistar rats."( Effect of P-glycoprotein inhibitor, verapamil, on oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in rats.
Bansal, T; Jaggi, M; Khar, RK; Mishra, G; Talegaonkar, S, 2009
)
0.82
" This is the first clinical evaluation of fixed drug ratio dosing designed to maintain synergistic molar ratios for enhanced therapeutic benefit."( Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of CPX-1 liposome injection in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Batist, G; Chi, KN; Chia, SK; Gelmon, KA; Janoff, AS; Louie, AC; Mayer, LD; Miller, WH; Swenson, CE, 2009
)
0.35
" The purpose of this article is to review the available information on capecitabine with respect to clinical efficacy for tumors of the digestive tract, adverse-effect profile, documented drug interactions, dosage and administration, and future directions of ongoing research."( The role of capecitabine in the management of tumors of the digestive system.
Gennatas, C; Gennatas, S; Michalaki, V, 2009
)
0.35
" As the drug was well tolerated, the dosage was increased to 80 mg/m(2) after 2 cycles."( Irinotecan in cancer patients with end-stage renal failure.
Boesler, B; Czock, D; Keller, F; Rasche, FM; Shipkova, M, 2009
)
1.8
"We conclude that approximately two-thirds of the standard weekly irinotecan dosage regimen should be considered in patients with ESRF."( Irinotecan in cancer patients with end-stage renal failure.
Boesler, B; Czock, D; Keller, F; Rasche, FM; Shipkova, M, 2009
)
2.03
" Dosing schemas were based on the maximum-tolerated dose derived in a previous phase I study."( Phase II trial of irinotecan and carboplatin for extensive or relapsed small-cell lung cancer.
Chen, G; Fehrenbacher, L; Gandara, D; Goldstein, D; Huynh, M; Lara, PN; Lau, D; Russin, M; West, H; Yavorkovsky, LL, 2009
)
0.69
" Our present findings reveal the underlying mechanism by which GCs enhance the chemotherapeutic effect of CPT-11 and indicate the possibility that the dosage of CPT-11 could be reduced by the combination treatment with GCs, which may attenuate the adverse effect without decreasing anti-tumor activity."( Role of glucocorticoid receptor in the regulation of cellular sensitivity to irinotecan hydrochloride.
Akagi, T; Aramaki, H; Fujii, A; Fukagawa, T; Higuchi, S; Iba, H; Ikemura, T; Kage, Y; Koyanagi, S; Matsunaga, N; Ohdo, S; To, H; Uchida, A, 2009
)
0.58
" Additionally, no dosage decrease was required, and only 4 cycles were withheld for 1 week because of neutropenia."( Efficacy and safety of capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination as second-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.
Hatzopoulos, A; Heras, P; Karagiannis, S; Kritikos, K; Kritikos, N; Mitsibounas, D; Xourafas, V,
)
0.13
" In the human HT-29 colon tumor xenograft mouse model, SSA significantly inhibited tumor growth at a dosage of 250 mg/kg."( A novel sulindac derivative that does not inhibit cyclooxygenases but potently inhibits colon tumor cell growth and induces apoptosis with antitumor activity.
Coward, L; Gary, BD; Gorman, G; Hobrath, JV; Keeton, AB; Li, Y; Mathew, B; Maxuitenko, YY; Piazza, GA; Reynolds, RC; Sani, B; Thaiparambil, J; Tinsley, HN; Whitt, JD, 2009
)
0.35
" With genetic testing, irinotecan dosage was reduced 25% in homozygotes with the UGT1A1*28 variant allele."( Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenetic testing for uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 before irinotecan administration for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Blinder, V; Gold, HT; Hall, MJ; Schackman, BR, 2009
)
0.88
" The CPT-11 dosage was 150 mg/m(2)."( [Two cases of advanced colorectal cancer with UGT1A1*28 homozygosity treated by FOLFIRI].
Fukuoka, T; Hatano, N; Imamura, Y; Morita, Y; Usui, H; Yokoyama, S, 2009
)
0.35
"Weekly dosing of combination of irinotecan and docetaxel is active against MBC."( N0332 phase 2 trial of weekly irinotecan hydrochloride and docetaxel in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Trial.
Anderson, DM; Bernath, AM; Gamini, SS; Hillman, DW; Niedringhaus, R; Northfelt, DW; Palmieri, F; Perez, EA; Salim, M; Stella, PJ; Tan, WW, 2010
)
0.93
" Starting chemotherapy dosage (dose level: 0) was capecitabine 550 mg/m bid, day 1 to 5 every week through out x-ray therapy, irinotecan 30 mg/ m IV on days 1, 8, 22, 29 (no treatment on day 15 and day 36), and celecoxib 400 mg PO bid from day 1 till the last day of radiation."( A phase I study of capecitabine, irinotecan, celecoxib, and radiation as neoadjuvant therapy of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Alqaisi, M; Bernal, P; Bush, D; Byrd, J; Garberoglio, C; Hussein, F; Malik, I, 2010
)
0.85
"Recommended dosage for future trials is capecitabine 625 mg/m bid, irinotecan 35 mg/m, and celecoxib 400 mg orally bid in combination with pelvic radiation."( A phase I study of capecitabine, irinotecan, celecoxib, and radiation as neoadjuvant therapy of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Alqaisi, M; Bernal, P; Bush, D; Byrd, J; Garberoglio, C; Hussein, F; Malik, I, 2010
)
0.88
"A PK/PD model was built that linked the dosing regimen of a compound to the inhibition of tumor growth in mouse xenograft models."( Preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to predict synergistic effects of co-administered anti-cancer agents.
Ashwell, S; Brassil, PJ; Dai, J; Garner, CE; Gönen, M; Goteti, K; Kern, SE; Moustakas, DT; Schwartz, GK; Utley, L; Zabludoff, S, 2010
)
0.36
" When Model II was applied to the antitumor activity of irinotecan and flavopiridol combination therapy, the modeling was able to reproduce the optimal dosing interval between administrations of the compounds."( Preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to predict synergistic effects of co-administered anti-cancer agents.
Ashwell, S; Brassil, PJ; Dai, J; Garner, CE; Gönen, M; Goteti, K; Kern, SE; Moustakas, DT; Schwartz, GK; Utley, L; Zabludoff, S, 2010
)
0.61
"The every 2 week dosing is well tolerated with a phase II recommended dose of 45 mg/m of flavopiridol in combination with irinotecan (80 mg/m) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m)."( A phase I study of flavopiridol in combination with gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with metastatic cancer.
Chyi Lee, F; Fekrazad, HM; Rabinowitz, I; Royce, M; Smith, HO; Verschraegen, CF, 2010
)
0.8
" It is also considered necessary to adjust the dosage of the anticancer drugs and the dosing period for patients with a PS of 2 when preparing a chemotherapeutic regimen for digestive carcinoma, including stomach carcinoma."( [Combination chemotherapy of S-1 and CPT-11 for advanced recurrent gastric cancer].
Akasaka, O; Anan, H; Ando, T; Iwase, S; Kasama, M; Koh, R; Matsueda, R; Miwa, H; Morita, S, 2009
)
0.35
"Although triweekly administration of paclitaxel is approved for gastric cancer in Japan, currently, the drug is often delivered with a weekly schedule because of the equivalent efficacy and lesser toxicity of this dosing schedule as compared with the triweekly administration schedule."( Weekly paclitaxel for heavily treated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer refractory to fluorouracil, irinotecan, and cisplatin.
Boku, N; Fukutomi, A; Hironaka, S; Kojima, T; Machida, N; Onozawa, Y; Sakamoto, T; Shimoyama, R; Taku, K; Todaka, A; Tomita, H; Tsushima, T; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H, 2009
)
0.57
"Individualized drug dosing is a longstanding goal of clinical pharmacologists."( Individualizing dosing of irinotecan.
Innocenti, F; Ratain, MJ, 2010
)
0.66
" This phase I study was performed to determine the recommended dosage (RD) of metronomic chemotherapy using oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with previously untreated advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer."( Dosage escalation study of S-1 and irinotecan in metronomic chemotherapy against advanced colorectal cancer.
Akagi, Y; Ishibashi, N; Mori, S; Ogata, Y; Sasatomi, T; Shirouzu, K, 2009
)
0.83
"There is no major difference of efficacy and safety between cetuximab given every 2 weeks and a weekly dosing regimen, in association with irinotecan."( Irinotecan associated with cetuximab given every 2 weeks versus cetuximab weekly in metastatic colorectal cancer.
De la Fouchardiere, C; Desseigne, F; Dussart, S; Errihani, H; Mrabti, H; Negrier, S,
)
1.78
"Thirty-two patients with unresectable stage IIIA/B NSCLC received irinotecan (30 mg/m) and carboplatin dosed to a target area under the concentration curve of 2, each administered weekly for 7 weeks."( Efficacy and toxicity of chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin and irinotecan followed by consolidation docetaxel for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.
Bastos, BR; Gomez, J; Hatoum, GF; Lopes, G; Raez, LE; Santos, ES; Takita, C; Tolba, K; Walker, GR, 2010
)
0.84
" As the drug is orally administered, capecitabine permits greater convenience and flexibility in dosing by eliminating the need for continuous infusion and its potential complications."( Dosing considerations for capecitabine-irinotecan regimens in the treatment of metastatic and/or locally advanced colorectal cancer.
Boehm, KA; Cartwright, T; McCollum, D, 2010
)
0.63
"75) would seem to provide a good index of dosage requirement of CPT-11 in pediatric patients."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigation of irinotecan hydrochloride in pediatric patients with recurrent or progressive solid tumors.
Barrett, JS; Ida, K; Ishida, Y; Kaneko, M; Kashiwase, S; Kimura, T; Kumagai, M; Makimoto, A; Mugishima, H; Nagatoshi, Y; Taga, T, 2010
)
0.61
" For Docetaxel and 5-FU, a linear correlation between this sensitizing effect and the ascorbate dosage is observed."( Ascorbate exerts anti-proliferative effects through cell cycle inhibition and sensitizes tumor cells towards cytostatic drugs.
Aigner, A; Czubayko, F; Frömberg, A; Gutsch, D; Schulze, D; Vollbracht, C; Weiss, G, 2011
)
0.37
" The review aims to provide an evidence-based update of clinical trials investigating the clinical efficacy, adverse-event profile, dosage and administration of this drug, alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutics and/or new target-oriented drugs, in the management of colorectal cancer patients."( Update on capecitabine alone and in combination regimens in colorectal cancer patients.
Azzariti, A; Cinieri, S; Colucci, G; De Vita, F; Lorusso, V; Maiello, E; Millaku, A; Numico, G; Petriella, D; Pisconti, S; Russo, A; Santini, D; Silvestris, N; Tommasi, S, 2010
)
0.36
" 3a and 3b demonstrated significant brain penetration when dosed orally in mice."( 14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
Ahluwalia, D; Bhupathi, D; Cai, X; Duan, JX; Hart, CP; Huang, H; Jiao, H; Jung, B; Jung, D; Liu, Q; Matteucci, J; Matteucci, M; Meng, F; Sun, JD, 2011
)
0.37
" Cetuximab was given at the approved dosage to all patients."( Retrospective analysis of cetuximab monotherapy for patients with irinotecan-intolerant metastatic colorectal cancer.
Inaba, Y; Kato, M; Kondo, C; Mizota, A; Muro, K; Nomura, M; Sato, Y; Shitara, K; Takahari, D; Ura, T; Yamaura, H; Yokota, T, 2011
)
0.61
"Administration of an oral cephalosporin allowed advancement of the dosage of oral irinotecan."( Dose escalation of intravenous irinotecan using oral cefpodoxime: a phase I study in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.
Crews, KR; Furman, WL; Houghton, PJ; McCarville, MB; McGregor, LM; Navid, F; Rodriguez-Galindo, C; Santana, VM; Stewart, CF; Tagen, M; Wozniak, A; Wu, J, 2012
)
0.89
" Cohorts of 3-6 pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled at 4 dosage levels, starting at the single-agent irinotecan MTD of 20 mg/m(2) /dose."( Dose escalation of intravenous irinotecan using oral cefpodoxime: a phase I study in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.
Crews, KR; Furman, WL; Houghton, PJ; McCarville, MB; McGregor, LM; Navid, F; Rodriguez-Galindo, C; Santana, VM; Stewart, CF; Tagen, M; Wozniak, A; Wu, J, 2012
)
0.87
"Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had progressed on therapy with 5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan in the first and second line setting and on the combination of irinotecan and cetuximab in third line setting independent of their KRAS mutation status, were treated with irinotecan and cetuximab combined with bevacizumab in a dosage of 5 mg/kg."( Bevacizumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan after failure of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bjerregaard, JK; Fromm, AL; Hoegdall, E; Jensen, BV; Jørgensen, TL; Larsen, FO; Nielsen, D; Pfeiffer, P; Qvortrup, C; Skougaard, K; Vistisen, K, 2011
)
0.84
" Considering the rapid formation of SN-38, the proportional increase in exposure levels, and its longer elimination half-life, less frequent dosing of SN2310 emulsion may be considered for the treatment of patients with advanced solid malignancies."( Pharmacokinetics of SN2310, an injectable emulsion that incorporates a new derivative of SN-38 in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Anderson, K; Burris, HA; Jones, S; Marier, JF; Pheng, L; Porubek, D; Trinh, MM; Warner, S, 2011
)
0.37
" The circadian disruptive effects of irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, was investigated according to dosing time and sex."( Sex and dosing-time dependencies in irinotecan-induced circadian disruption.
Ahowesso, C; Beau, J; Claustrat, B; Delaunay, F; Dulong, S; Filipski, E; Hossard, V; Lévi, F; Li, XM; Peteri-Brunbäck, B; Zampera, S, 2011
)
0.92
" Further studies with this regimen using the dosing schedules evaluated in this study are not warranted."( Phase I study of sunitinib and irinotecan for patients with recurrent malignant glioma.
Coan, A; Desjardins, A; Friedman, HS; Gururangan, S; Herndon, JE; Peters, KB; Reardon, DA; Rich, JN; Sathornsumetee, S; Vredenburgh, JJ, 2011
)
0.66
" Using colorectal xenograft models, we examined the therapeutic benefit of Cathepsin S inhibition using Fsn0503 in combination with a metronomic dosing regimen of CPT-11."( Inhibition of Cathepsin S by Fsn0503 enhances the efficacy of chemotherapy in colorectal carcinomas.
Burden, RE; Gazdoiu, M; Gormley, JA; Jaquin, TJ; Johnston, JA; Kuehn, D; Kwok, HF; McClurg, A; Olwill, SA; Scott, CJ; Ward, C, 2012
)
0.38
" Irinotecan dosing started at 50 mg m(-2) and was escalated in patients by 25 mg m(-2) increments up to a maximum dose of 150 mg m(-2)."( Phase I study of irinotecan and gefitinib in patients with gefitinib treatment failure for non-small cell lung cancer.
Horai, T; Horiike, A; Kasahara, K; Kudo, K; Miyauchi, E; Nishio, M; Ohyanagi, F, 2011
)
1.62
" A single injection or 2 injections of IHL-305 on several dosing schedules also resulted in a significant antitumor effect compared to that of vehicle control in a dose-dependent manner and showed comparable antitumor activity at about one-fifth the dose of the maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11."( Antitumor activity of IHL-305, a novel pegylated liposome containing irinotecan, in human xenograft models.
Furuta, T; Hashimoto, S; Kodaira, H; Kurita, A; Matsuzaki, T; Nohara, G; Sawada, S; Takagi, A; Ueno, S, 2012
)
0.61
" The glycinamide analog 45 showed significant efficacy in the HCT-116 xenograft model, with 64% inhibition of tumor growth upon dosing at 20 mg/kg qd."( 1,1-Diarylalkenes as anticancer agents: dual inhibitors of tubulin polymerization and phosphodiesterase 4.
Cedzik, D; Chen, R; Collette, A; Leisten, J; Liu, W; Lu, L; Man, HW; Muller, GW; Narla, RK; Raymon, HK; Ruchelman, AL; Zhang, L, 2011
)
0.37
" Liposomal drug delivery systems have the ability to provide a dual mechanism of activity where tumor accumulation can deliver high local concentrations of the drug at the site of action with concomitant slow release of the drug from carriers in the blood compartment that results in antivascular effects, similar to that achieved when dosing frequently at low levels."( Lipid-based nanoformulation of irinotecan: dual mechanism of action allows for combination chemo/angiogenic therapy.
Anantha, M; Bally, MB; Sutherland, B; Verreault, M; Waterhouse, DN; Yapp, D, 2011
)
0.66
" Angiogenesis was induced in normal adult rat mesentery by intraperitoneal injection of a low dosage of VEGF-A."( Low-dosage metronomic chemotherapy and angiogenesis: topoisomerase inhibitors irinotecan and mitoxantrone stimulate VEGF-A-mediated angiogenesis.
Albertsson, P; Lennernäs, B; Norrby, K, 2012
)
0.61
" We show that real-time flow cytometric quantification of compound-uptake is reliably measured and that analyzing their respective uptake kinetic provides additional valuable information which can be used for improving drug dosage and delivery."( Utilizing inherent fluorescence of therapeutics to analyze real-time uptake and multi-parametric effector kinetics.
Efferth, T; Eichhorn, T; Korn, B; Paulsen, M; Wiench, B, 2012
)
0.38
" The antitumor activity, different dosing sequences, and dosing regimens of TH-302 in combination with commonly used conventional chemotherapeutics were investigated in human tumor xenograft models."( TH-302, a hypoxia-activated prodrug with broad in vivo preclinical combination therapy efficacy: optimization of dosing regimens and schedules.
Ahluwalia, D; Ammons, WS; Baker, AF; Cranmer, LD; Curd, JG; Duan, JX; Ferraro, D; Hart, CP; Liu, Q; Matteucci, MD; Sun, JD; Wang, J; Wang, Y, 2012
)
0.38
" Simultaneous administration of TH-302 and chemotherapeutics increased toxicity versus schedules with dosing separations."( TH-302, a hypoxia-activated prodrug with broad in vivo preclinical combination therapy efficacy: optimization of dosing regimens and schedules.
Ahluwalia, D; Ammons, WS; Baker, AF; Cranmer, LD; Curd, JG; Duan, JX; Ferraro, D; Hart, CP; Liu, Q; Matteucci, MD; Sun, JD; Wang, J; Wang, Y, 2012
)
0.38
" After recovery from the adverse event, another 4 courses at a 20% lower dosage for safety were administered."( [A case of S-1-resistant resected advanced gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node recurrence responding to bi-weekly CPT-11 and CDDP].
Ikeda, T; Minamoto, K; Yuasa, I, 2012
)
0.38
" We conducted a phase I study to determine the AUC-calculated optimal dosage of NDP used in combination chemotherapy with irinotecan (CPT-11) for gynecologic malignancies."( Area under the curve calculation of nedaplatin dose used in combination chemotherapy with irinotecan in a phase I study of gynecologic malignancies.
Fujiwara, H; Harada, T; Itamochi, H; Kigawa, J; Machida, S; Oishi, T; Sato, S; Shimada, M; Suzuki, M; Takei, Y, 2012
)
0.81
"The recommended dosage of NDP calculated by AUC with Ishibashi's formula was set to AUC 10 in combination chemotherapy with CPT-11."( Area under the curve calculation of nedaplatin dose used in combination chemotherapy with irinotecan in a phase I study of gynecologic malignancies.
Fujiwara, H; Harada, T; Itamochi, H; Kigawa, J; Machida, S; Oishi, T; Sato, S; Shimada, M; Suzuki, M; Takei, Y, 2012
)
0.6
"The objective of the current investigation was to study the degradation behavior of irinotecan hydrochloride under different International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) recommended stress conditions using ultra-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and to establish a validated stability-indicating reverse-phase ultra-performance liquid chromatographic method for the quantitative determination of irinotecan hydrochloride and its seven impurities and degradation products in pharmaceutical dosage forms."( UPLC and LC-MS studies on degradation behavior of irinotecan hydrochloride and development of a validated stability-indicating ultra-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of irinotecan hydrochloride and its impurities in pharmaceutic
Kumar, N; Reddy, SP; Sangeetha, D, 2012
)
0.86
"Vandetanib (an orally bioavailable VEGFR-2 and EGFR tyrosine kinases inhibitor) was combined at 100 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg daily with standard dosed cetuximab and irinotecan (3+3 dose-escalation design)."( Phase I study of cetuximab, irinotecan, and vandetanib (ZD6474) as therapy for patients with previously treated metastastic colorectal cancer.
Abrams, TA; Ancukiewicz, M; Blaszkowsky, L; Chan, JA; Duda, DG; Elliott, M; Enzinger, PC; Goldstein, M; Jain, RK; Kulke, MH; Meyerhardt, JA; Regan, E; Schrag, D; Wolpin, BM; Zhu, AX, 2012
)
0.87
" Dose escalation (n = 44) was associated with an increase in skin reactions ≥ grade 2 compared with standard (n = 45) dosing (59% v 38%, respectively)."( Intrapatient cetuximab dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer according to the grade of early skin reactions: the randomized EVEREST study.
Cats, A; Ciardiello, F; Gallerani, E; Gelderblom, H; Glimelius, B; Hendlisz, A; Humblet, Y; Moehler, M; Peeters, M; Sagaert, X; Schlichting, M; Tejpar, S; Van Cutsem, E; Vanbeckevoort, D; Vermorken, JB; Viret, F; Vlassak, S, 2012
)
0.38
"IHL-305, a novel preparation of irinotecan encapsulated in liposomes, can be safely given to patients in a repeated fashion on a 4- or 2-week dosing schedule."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of IHL-305 (PEGylated liposomal irinotecan) in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Bendell, JC; Burris, HA; Chan, E; Ikeda, S; Infante, JR; Jones, SF; Keedy, VL; Kodaira, H; Lee, W; Rothenberg, ML; Wu, H; Zamboni, WC, 2012
)
0.9
" It was designed to maximize cytoreduction via high dosing of synergistically interacting agents, while minimizing morbidity in patients with resistant neuroblastoma (NB) and ineligible for clinical trials due to myelosuppression from previous therapy."( 5-day/5-drug myeloablative outpatient regimen for resistant neuroblastoma.
Basu, EM; Cheung, NK; Kramer, K; Kushner, BH; Modak, S; Roberts, SS, 2013
)
0.39
"The results in this study suggest that FOLFIRI, a common regimen combining irinotecan and 5-FU, should switch the dosing sequence, namely from 5-FU to irinotecan, to enhance hydrolytic activation of irinotecan."( Regulation of carboxylesterase-2 expression by p53 family proteins and enhanced anti-cancer activities among 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan and doxazolidine prodrug.
Charpentier, M; Guo, L; Lu, W; Xiao, D; Yan, B; Yang, D, 2013
)
0.83
" The dosing schedule appears to affect the toxicity profile of the drug."( A systematic review on topoisomerase 1 inhibition in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
Balslev, E; Brünner, N; Kümler, I; Nielsen, DL; Stenvang, J, 2013
)
0.39
" Pharmacokinetically-directed dosing protocols of everolimus and irinotecan were established and used to assess the in vivo antitumor effects of the agents."( Utilization of quantitative in vivo pharmacology approaches to assess combination effects of everolimus and irinotecan in mouse xenograft models of colorectal cancer.
Bradshaw-Pierce, EL; Eckhardt, SG; Gustafson, DL; Kulikowski, G; Merz, AL; Pitts, TM; Selby, H; Serkova, NJ; Weekes, CD, 2013
)
0.84
" Combination effects of everolimus and irinotecan were determined in CRC xenograft models using clinically-relevant dosing protocols."( Utilization of quantitative in vivo pharmacology approaches to assess combination effects of everolimus and irinotecan in mouse xenograft models of colorectal cancer.
Bradshaw-Pierce, EL; Eckhardt, SG; Gustafson, DL; Kulikowski, G; Merz, AL; Pitts, TM; Selby, H; Serkova, NJ; Weekes, CD, 2013
)
0.87
" The optimum dosing combination of these two agents has yet to be determined however, and in many patients it is likely that greater overall survival will be achieved by using them in successive lines rather than in combination."( New oxaliplatin-based combinations in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Cassidy, J; Hochster, H, 2003
)
0.32
"Irinotecan dosing based on UGT1A1*28 and *6 is feasible, and higher doses of irinotecan can be safely administered in patients with 0 or 1 DA, compared to those with 2 DA."( A UGT1A1*28 and *6 genotype-directed phase I dose-escalation trial of irinotecan with fixed-dose capecitabine in Korean patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bae, KS; Chang, HM; Hong, YS; Kang, YK; Kim, HS; Kim, KP; Kim, TW; Lee, JL; Lee, JS; Shin, JG; Sym, SJ, 2013
)
2.07
" It is predicted that prophylaxis of CPT-11 induced diarrhea will reduce sub-therapeutic dosing as well as hospitalizations and will eventually lead to dose escalations resulting in better response rates."( Therapeutic targeting of CPT-11 induced diarrhea: a case for prophylaxis.
Goel, S; Mani, S; Swami, U, 2013
)
0.39
" The goal of the contemporary research is to determine the predictive factors that will enable the individual adjustment of the individual drug dosage while minimising the adverse effects and maintaining the treatment benefit."( Predictors of irinotecan toxicity and efficacy in treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Filip, S; Grim, J; Paulík, A, 2012
)
0.74
"In sequential phase II studies assessing two dosing schedules, patients with metastatic colorectal cancers refractory to bevacizumab-, fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens received everolimus 70 mg/wk (n = 99) or 10 mg/d (n = 100)."( Phase II study of everolimus in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma previously treated with bevacizumab-, fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens.
Arrowsmith, ER; Bajetta, E; Del Prete, SA; Fuchs, CS; Hwang, J; Jin, J; Malek, K; Ng, K; Ryan, DP; Sedova, M; Sharma, S; Tabernero, J, 2013
)
0.78
"Traditional post-surgical chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer is notorious for its devastating side effects due to the high dosage required."( Drug-eluting scaffold to deliver chemotherapeutic medication for management of pancreatic cancer after surgery.
Chen, H; Deng, X; Jin, J; Li, H; Peng, C; Shen, B; Zhan, Q; Zhang, X, 2013
)
0.39
" However, CPT-11 dosage can be adjusted according to measured SN-38 pharmacokinetics."( Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai.
Cai, X; Cao, W; Ding, H; Liu, T; Wang, L; Wang, M; Xu, Q; Zhao, Z; Zhong, M; Zhou, X, 2013
)
0.63
" For the (TA)6/(TA)6 genotype, CPT-11 dosage can be increased gradually to improve efficacy for patients with SN-38 peak concentration ≤43."( Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai.
Cai, X; Cao, W; Ding, H; Liu, T; Wang, L; Wang, M; Xu, Q; Zhao, Z; Zhong, M; Zhou, X, 2013
)
0.63
" Sensitive, rapid, and fully validated electrochemical and RP-LC methods for the determination of IRT in its dosage form were presented in details."( Analytical application of polymethylene blue-multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode on anticancer drug irinotecan and determination of its ionization constant value.
Akmese, B; Can, A; Dogan-Topal, B; Karadas, N; Ozkan, SA; Sanli, S, 2013
)
0.6
" We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of two etirinotecan pegol dosing schedules in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer to determine an optimum dosing schedule for phase 3 trials."( Two schedules of etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer: a randomised phase 2 study.
Awada, A; Barrett-Lee, PJ; Chan, S; Chia, YL; Cocquyt, V; Coleman, RE; Garcia, AA; Hamm, JT; Hannah, AL; Hoch, U; Huizing, MT; Jerusalem, GH; Mehdi, A; O'Reilly, SM; Perez, EA; Sideras, K; Young, DE; Zhao, C, 2013
)
0.97
"UGT1A1 genotype affects the dose and pharmacokinetics of the CAPIRINOX regimen and UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of CAPIRINOX is ongoing in a phase II study of small bowel cancer (NCT00433550)."( UGT1A1 genotype-guided phase I study of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine.
Ames, MM; Erlichman, C; Goetz, MP; Goldberg, RM; Grothey, AA; Kuffel, MA; Mandrekar, SJ; McGovern, RM; McKean, HA; McWilliams, R; Reid, JM; Safgren, SL; Tan, AD, 2013
)
0.66
" However, there is a paucity of data from sufficiently powered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies to support dosage recommendations in such patients."( Optimization of cancer chemotherapy on the basis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: from patients enrolled in clinical trials to those in the 'real world'.
Fujita, K; Sasaki, Y, 2014
)
0.4
" Dosing at ZT15 rather than ZT3 reduced mean leucopenia (9% vs 53%; p<0."( Optimization of irinotecan chronotherapy with P-glycoprotein inhibition.
Berland, E; Filipski, E; Guettier, C; Lévi, F; Okyar, A; Ozturk, N; van der Horst, GT, 2014
)
0.75
" To uncover the sources of heterogeneity, subgroup meta-analysis was conducted according to the dosage of IRI."( UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms are correlated with irinotecan-induced toxicity: a system review and meta-analysis in Asians.
Cheng, L; Dong, XL; Hu, J; Li, M; Liu, BR; Qian, XP; Ren, W; Sun, ZP; Xie, L; Xu, GX, 2014
)
0.67
"3%); alteration and complete recovery (31%) or sustained deterioration (45%), possibly due to inadequate chronotherapy dosing and/or timing."( The circadian rest-activity rhythm, a potential safety pharmacology endpoint of cancer chemotherapy.
Beau, J; Innominato, PF; Iurisci, I; Karaboue, A; Lévi, F; Madrid, JA; Moreau, T; Ortiz-Tudela, E; Rol, MA, 2014
)
0.4
" The ECM algorithm for incomplete data is applied to estimating the dose-response relationship in the proposed model."( Modeling sustained treatment effects in tumor xenograft experiments.
Deng, D; Fang, HB; Tan, M; Zhang, T, 2014
)
0.4
" However, the clinical utility of routine UGT1A1*28 genotyping to pre-emptively adjust irinotecan dosage is dependent upon whether UGT1A1*28 also affects patient survival following irinotecan therapy."( The effect of the UGT1A1*28 allele on survival after irinotecan-based chemotherapy: a collaborative meta-analysis.
Boige, V; Dias, MM; Glimelius, B; Karapetis, CS; Kweekel, DM; Lara, PN; Laurent-Puig, P; Martinez-Balibrea, E; McKinnon, RA; Páez, D; Pignon, JP; Punt, CJ; Redman, MW; Sorich, MJ; Toffoli, G; Wadelius, M, 2014
)
0.87
"This study attempted to determine the therapeutic dosage of irinotecan and S-1 (IRIS) as a second-line treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC)."( Phase I/II trial of irinotecan and S-1 combination chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.
Akazawa, K; Funakoshi, K; Hasegawa, J; Hatakeyama, K; Maruyama, S; Okada, T; Takii, Y; Tani, T; Yamazaki, T, 2013
)
0.96
" The irinotecan dose was then escalated to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the recommended dose at a fixed dosage of S-1 (80 or 65 mg·m(-2)·day(-1))."( Phase I/II trial of irinotecan and S-1 combination chemotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer.
Akazawa, K; Funakoshi, K; Hasegawa, J; Hatakeyama, K; Maruyama, S; Okada, T; Takii, Y; Tani, T; Yamazaki, T, 2013
)
1.23
"The UGT1A1*28 genotype can be used to individualize dosing of irinotecan."( Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study to optimize the dosing of irinotecan according to the UGT1A1 genotype of patients with cancer.
Das, S; House, LK; Innocenti, F; Janisch, L; Karrison, T; Maitland, ML; Marsh, R; Ramírez, J; Ratain, MJ; Salgia, R; Schilsky, RL; Turcich, M; Undevia, S; Wu, K, 2014
)
0.88
"This review aims to provide an evidence-based update of clinical trials that have investigated the clinical efficacy, adverse-event profile, dosage and administration of S-1, given alone or in combination with conventional chemotherapeutics and new target-oriented drugs, in the management of colorectal cancer (CRC)."( Efficacy of S-1 in colorectal cancer.
Baba, H; Miyamoto, Y; Sakamoto, Y; Yoshida, N, 2014
)
0.4
" Twenty-five patients received treatment in three dosing cohorts and were evaluated for safety and tolerability of the combination and pharmacokinetics of individual drugs."( A phase I open-label study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab for relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Bennouna, J; Botbyl, J; de Labareyre, C; Delord, JP; Deslandres, M; Ruiz-Soto, R; Senellart, H; Suttle, AB; Wixon, C, 2015
)
0.63
" In a mouse xenograft model of human colon carcinoma, nal-IRI dosing could achieve higher intratumoral levels of the prodrug irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38 compared with free irinotecan."( Preclinical activity of nanoliposomal irinotecan is governed by tumor deposition and intratumor prodrug conversion.
Cain, J; Drummond, DC; Fitzgerald, JB; Kalra, AV; Kim, J; Klinz, SG; Nielsen, UB; Paz, N, 2014
)
0.88
"Seven patients with metastases confined to the liver were included and stratified into two groups, depending of dosage of systemic chemotherapy."( Fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan combined with intra-arterial hepatic infusion of drug-eluting beads preloaded with irinotecan in unresectable colorectal liver metastases: side effects and results of a concomitant treatment schedule. Clinical inves
Badzek, S; Golem, H; Gorsic, I; Kekez, D; Librenjak, N; Perkov, D; Plestina, S; Prejac, J; Smiljanic, R,
)
0.42
" The advantage of fractionated dosing was demonstrated, with potential implications for the clinical dosing schedule."( Improving the therapeutic index in cancer therapy by using antibody-drug conjugates designed with a moderately cytotoxic drug.
Cardillo, TM; Goldenberg, DM; Govindan, SV; McBride, WJ; Rossi, EA; Sharkey, RM; Trisal, P, 2015
)
0.42
" The treatment effects of sequential 5-FU dosing following IrC™ are additive with no additional toxicity in contrast to previous studies where concurrent 5-FU and IrC™ treatment exacerbated 5-FU toxicity."( Irinophore C™, a lipid nanoparticulate formulation of irinotecan, improves vascular function, increases the delivery of sequentially administered 5-FU in HT-29 tumors, and controls tumor growth in patient derived xenografts of colon cancer.
Anantha, M; Bally, MB; Gill, N; Karim, T; Neijzen, R; Ng, SS; Strutt, D; Tai, IT; Wang, H; Waterhouse, D; Wong, MQ; Yapp, DT, 2015
)
0.67
" Our own data as well as data from the literature was used to calculate those R levels revealing that the formation of 5'-DFUR - the immediate precursor of 5-fluorouracil - was not affected by concomitant medication within the dosing range investigated."( A simple method for comparing enzymatic capecitabine activation in various mono- and combination chemotherapies.
Baroian, N; Buchner, P; Czejka, M; Dittrich, C; Sahmanovic, A; Schreiber, V, 2015
)
0.42
" Alternative dosing schedules of SN38-TS NPs were compared to irinotecan."( Nanoparticle delivery of an SN38 conjugate is more effective than irinotecan in a mouse model of neuroblastoma.
Alferiev, IS; Brodeur, GM; Chorny, M; Croucher, JL; Iyer, R; Kolla, V; Levy, RJ; Mangino, JL, 2015
)
0.89
" An adaptive reduction in chemotherapy dosage was required in 2 patients due to hematological toxicity, and a delay in chemotherapy cycles was required for 3 patients."( FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as a second-line therapy for metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Bengrine, L; Ghiringhelli, F; Guion-Dusserre, JF; Lorgis, V; Vincent, J, 2015
)
0.42
" Dosing decisions were based on the probability of experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first two 21-day treatment cycles."( Phase I study of everolimus, cetuximab and irinotecan as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Beck, JT; Brandt, U; Davidson, SJ; Garrett, CR; Hecht, JR; Mackenzie, MJ; Reid, TR; Rizvi, S; Sharma, S, 2015
)
0.68
" Additional studies should evaluate the effect of nomogram-guided dosing on efficacy in patients receiving irinotecan."( An internally and externally validated nomogram for predicting the risk of irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia in advanced colorectal cancer patients.
Ando, Y; Fujita, K; Ichikawa, W; Minamimura, K; Miyauchi, H; Morita, S; Moriwaki, T; Nakamura, M; Ohashi, Y; Okutani, Y; Sadahiro, S; Sakata, Y; Shinozaki, K; Sugihara, M; Sugiyama, T; Takahashi, T; Takii, Y; Tanaka, C; Tsuji, A; Uehara, K, 2015
)
0.86
" Clinically relevant dosing schemes of IMMU-132 administered either every other week, weekly, or twice weekly in mice bearing human pancreatic or gastric cancer xenografts demonstrate similar, significant antitumor effects in both models."( Sacituzumab Govitecan (IMMU-132), an Anti-Trop-2/SN-38 Antibody-Drug Conjugate: Characterization and Efficacy in Pancreatic, Gastric, and Other Cancers.
Arrojo, R; Cardillo, TM; Chang, CH; Goldenberg, DM; Govindan, SV; Liu, D; Rossi, EA; Sharkey, RM; Trisal, P, 2015
)
0.42
" Doxycycline (Dox)-induced overexpression of Myc-ELAS1 caused γ-irradiation to induce apoptosis in human osteosarcoma (U2OS) cells, at 1/10th the effective dosage of γ-irradiation required for apoptosis in Myc-vector-expressing cells; ELAS1 peptide incorporation into U2OS cells also showed similar apoptotic effects."( ELAS1-mediated inhibition of the cyclin G1-B'γ interaction promotes cancer cell apoptosis via stabilization and activation of p53.
Mukai, S; Naito, Y; Nojima, H; Ohno, S; Yabuta, N, 2015
)
0.42
" Using genomic biomarkers, patients at high risk for developing side effects can be distinguished before initiating medical treatment, allowing the choice of an appropriate drug/initial dosage regimen."( [Utilization of Genomic Biomarkers for Post-marketing Safety of Drugs].
Kaniwa, N, 2015
)
0.42
"0 on day 1) every 3 weeks, with 3-6 patients treated at each irinotecan dosage level (levels I-IV)."( Weekly irinotecan combined with carboplatin for patients with small-cell lung cancer: A phase I study.
Inoue, A; Ishimoto, O; Maemondo, M; Nukiwa, T; Sugawara, S, 2015
)
1.11
" Thus, irinotecan dosage should be closely monitored for effective and safe chemotherapy in obese cancer patients who are at a higher risk of developing liver toxicity."( Impact of obesity on accumulation of the toxic irinotecan metabolite, SN-38, in mice.
Gandhi, A; Ghose, R; Mallick, P; Shah, P, 2015
)
1.13
"Female nude mice were intracranially or intracardially implanted with human brain seeking breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231Br) and dosed with irinotecan or NKTR-102 to determine plasma and tumor pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN38."( NKTR-102 Efficacy versus irinotecan in a mouse model of brain metastases of breast cancer.
Adkins, CE; Eldon, MA; Hoch, U; Hye, T; Lockman, PR; Mohammad, AS; Mohan, NK; Nounou, MI; Terrell-Hall, T, 2015
)
0.92
"Because the serum concentration of 5-FU fluctuates and displays various patterns, the dosage should not be based on body surface area."( Fluctuation in Plasma 5-Fluorouracil Concentration During Continuous 5-Fluorouracil Infusion for Colorectal Cancer.
Higashida, M; Hirai, T; Kubota, H; Matsumoto, H; Murakami, H; Okumura, H; Tohyama, K; Tsuruta, A, 2015
)
0.42
" We confirmed in these studies that after completion of the Q7D×3 dosing of IrC™, but not IRN, the tumor-associated vascular was normalized as compared to untreated tumors."( Determination of an optimal dosing schedule for combining Irinophore C™ and temozolomide in an orthotopic model of glioblastoma.
Anantha, M; Backstrom, I; Bally, MB; Chu, F; Kalra, J; Masin, D; Strutt, D; Verreault, M; Walker, D; Waterhouse, D; Wehbe, M; Yapp, DT, 2015
)
0.42
" This review first summarizes the roles of irinotecan in chemotherapy for metastatic CRC and then discusses the optimal dosing of irinotecan based on the aforementioned factors affecting systemic exposure to SN-38, with the ultimate goal of achieving personalized irinotecan-based chemotherapy."( Irinotecan, a key chemotherapeutic drug for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Fujita, K; Ishida, H; Kubota, Y; Sasaki, Y, 2015
)
2.12
" On the 7th day, the mice were euthanized, and intestinal samples were collected for histopathology and morphometric analysis, as well as for the determination of myeloperoxidase activity and cytokine dosage (TNF-α and IL-6)."( A new animal model of intestinal mucositis induced by the combination of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in mice.
Almeida, PR; Assis-Júnior, EM; Brito, GA; Lima-Júnior, RC; Melo, AT; Pereira, VB; Ribeiro, RA; Wong, DV, 2016
)
0.67
" Twice-daily oral dosing of veliparib (10-50 mg) occurred on days 3 to 14 (cycle 1) and days -1 to 14 (subsequent cycles) followed by a 6-day rest."( Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitor Veliparib (ABT-888) in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.
Bell, T; Boerner, JL; Boerner, SA; Bowditch, A; Burger, A; Cai, D; Chen, AP; Cleary, JM; Ferry-Galow, K; Heilbrun, LK; Ji, J; Kinders, RJ; Li, J; LoRusso, PM; Marrero, AM; Parchment, RE; Pilat, MJ; Rubinstein, L; Sausville, EA; Shapiro, GI; Smith, D; Tolaney, SM; Wolanski, A; Zhang, J; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
0.63
" We discuss the possible reasons why the pharmacological advantages of carrier-mediated chemotherapy did not translate into enhanced clinical efficacy including the role of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and the tumor microenvironment, the optimal dosing regimen for carrier-mediated agents, and the lack of standardization in the conduct and reporting of preclinical studies evaluating anticancer efficacy of these agents."( Meta-analysis of clinical and preclinical studies comparing the anticancer efficacy of liposomal versus conventional non-liposomal doxorubicin.
Alzghari, SK; Chee, W; La-Beck, NM; Petersen, GH; Sankari, SS, 2016
)
0.43
" Expert commentary: Pending issues that shall be addressed in the upcoming years include the optimization of ramucirumab dosing schedule, assessment of its role with other chemotherapy regimens or in other treatment settings, comparative evaluation of this agent with other antiangiogenics, and identification of predictive biomarkers to improve the therapeutic index and cost-effectiveness of this drug."( The safety and efficacy of ramucirumab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Diaz-Serrano, A; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Riesco-Martinez, MC, 2016
)
0.43
" This platform, which utilizes a 3D printed fluidic device, allows for dynamic dosing of three dimensional cell cultures, also known as spheroids."( Drug penetration and metabolism in 3D cell cultures treated in a 3D printed fluidic device: assessment of irinotecan via MALDI imaging mass spectrometry.
Heller, AA; Hummon, AB; LaBonia, GJ; Lockwood, SY; Spence, DM, 2016
)
0.65
" The subsequent free-flowing, SLH solid dosage form contained high loading levels of molecularly dispersed SN38 (5%w/w) and significantly enhanced in vitro dissolution in simulated gastrointestinal media."( Facilitating gastrointestinal solubilisation and enhanced oral absorption of SN38 using a molecularly complexed silica-lipid hybrid delivery system.
Bala, V; Prestidge, CA; Rao, S, 2016
)
0.43
" This relationship favors new treatment strategies with white blood cell growth factors or chemotherapy dosing based on muscle value."( Sarcopenia is Associated with Chemotherapy Toxicity in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Colorectal Cancer.
Ammari, S; Antoun, S; Bayar, MA; Chemama, S; Elias, D; Goéré, D; Lanoy, E; Raynard, B; Stoclin, A, 2016
)
0.43
" In these situations, instead of determining a dose that works for every patient, the trial aims to identify a dosing algorithm that prescribes dose according to the patient's biomarker or pharmacokinetic expression."( Sequential designs for individualized dosing in phase I cancer clinical trials.
Cheung, YK; Mao, X, 2017
)
0.46
" The dose of S-1 was escalated in a stepwise fashion from 40 (level 1) to 60 mg/m (level 2) and then 80 mg/m (level 3), whereas the dosage of irinotecan remained the same (150 mg/m)."( Phase I Clinical Study of Irinotecan Plus S-1 in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Cervical Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
Kimura, T; Kobayashi, E; Kozasa, K; Mabuchi, S; Owa, T; Tomimatsu, T; Tsutui, T; Yamashita, M; Yoki, T; Yokoi, E, 2016
)
0.94
" Using a genetically engineered model of NSCLC arising from induced mutation of KRas and knockout of Trp53, we continuously dosed mice with STA-8666 from immediately after tumor induction for 15 weeks."( Tumor-targeted SN38 inhibits growth of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a KRas/p53 transgenic mouse model.
Deneka, AY; Gaponova, AV; Golemis, EA; Haber, L; Kopp, MC; Nikonova, AS, 2017
)
0.46
" The authors performed a phase 2 cooperative group study (North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0543, Alliance) using genotype-dosed capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (gCAPIRINOX), with dosing assigned based on UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) genotype to test: 1) whether the addition of irinotecan would improve outcomes; and 2) whether UGT1A1 genotype-based dosing could optimize tolerability."( North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0543 (Alliance): A phase 2 trial of pharmacogenetic-based dosing of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma.
Ames, MM; Foster, NR; Goetz, MP; Hobday, TJ; Horvath, LE; Jatoi, A; Mahoney, MR; McWilliams, RR; Meyers, JP; Murray, JA; Schneider, DJ; Smyrk, TC, 2017
)
0.87
"Previously untreated patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma received irinotecan (day 1), oxaliplatin (day 1), and capecitabine (days 2-15) in a 21-day cycle and were dosed with gCAPIRINOX according to UGT1A1*28 genotypes (6/6, 6/7, and 7/7)."( North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0543 (Alliance): A phase 2 trial of pharmacogenetic-based dosing of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma.
Ames, MM; Foster, NR; Goetz, MP; Hobday, TJ; Horvath, LE; Jatoi, A; Mahoney, MR; McWilliams, RR; Meyers, JP; Murray, JA; Schneider, DJ; Smyrk, TC, 2017
)
0.9
"UGT1A1 genotype-directed dosing (gCAPIRINOX) appears to be feasible with favorable rates of hematologic toxicity compared with prior 3-drug studies in unselected patients."( North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0543 (Alliance): A phase 2 trial of pharmacogenetic-based dosing of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma.
Ames, MM; Foster, NR; Goetz, MP; Hobday, TJ; Horvath, LE; Jatoi, A; Mahoney, MR; McWilliams, RR; Meyers, JP; Murray, JA; Schneider, DJ; Smyrk, TC, 2017
)
0.67
"Purpose The objectives were to evaluate dosing schedules of labetuzumab govitecan, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) for tumor delivery of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), in an expanded phase II trial of patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer."( Phase I/II Trial of Labetuzumab Govitecan (Anti-CEACAM5/SN-38 Antibody-Drug Conjugate) in Patients With Refractory or Relapsing Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Berlin, JD; Cohen, SJ; Dotan, E; Goldberg, RM; Goldenberg, DM; Govindan, SV; Guarino, MJ; Hecht, JR; Lieu, CH; Marshall, JL; Messersmith, WA; Sharkey, RM; Simpson, PS; Starodub, AN; Wegener, WA, 2017
)
0.46
"Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) are frequently dose limiting for oncology agents, requiring extensive clinical testing of alternative schedules to identify optimal dosing regimens."( Systems Pharmacology Model of Gastrointestinal Damage Predicts Species Differences and Optimizes Clinical Dosing Schedules.
Barnes, J; Cronin, A; Jasper, P; Mettetal, JT; Shankaran, H; Sharma, P; Tolsma, J, 2018
)
0.48
" This would allow fine-tuning the dosage according to the patient's metabolism, a key condition to reduce side effects."( Peptide biosensors for anticancer drugs: Design in silico to work in denaturizing environment.
Battisti, A; Berti, F; Buzzo, M; Giodini, L; Gladich, I; Guida, F; Laio, A; Marangon, E; Toffoli, G, 2018
)
0.48
" By analyzing multiple CTOs from a patient, this method could be used to predict patient-specific drug responses and help to improve personalized dosing regimens."( MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Evaluation of Therapeutics in Colorectal Tumor Organoids.
Flinders, C; Hummon, AB; Liu, X; Mumenthaler, SM, 2018
)
0.48
" Dosage adjustment occurred in only 3 (30."( A pilot clinical study of apatinib plus irinotecan in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma: Clinical Trial/Experimental Study.
Jiang, X; Li, C; Liang, L; Liu, L; Lu, P; Qiao, Y; Wang, L; Xia, Y; Yang, T, 2017
)
0.72
"At present, drug dosage is based on standardised approaches that disregard pharmakokinetic differences between patients and lead to non-optimal efficacy and unnecessary side effects."( pH-Mediated molecular differentiation for fluorimetric quantification of chemotherapeutic drugs in human plasma.
Guldin, S; Krol, S; Salvati, E; Serrano, LA; Stellacci, F; Yang, Y, 2018
)
0.48
" Other than BSA, which was already accounted by a BSA-based dosing scheme, no other covariates were deemed to have clinical implications."( Integrated population pharmacokinetics of etirinotecan pegol and its four metabolites in cancer patients with solid tumors.
Chia, YL; Eldon, MA; Gordi, T; Hoch, U; Sy, SKB, 2018
)
0.74
" Alternatively, the concept of prior dosing allows for the application of dialyzable chemotherapeutic drugs using a normal dose, with an HD followed shortly after to mimic normal renal function."( Chemotherapeutic agents eligible for prior dosing in pancreatic cancer patients requiring hemodialysis: a systematic review
.
Egger, J; Hann, A; Hermann, PC; Keller, F; Nosalski, E; Seufferlein, T, 2018
)
0.48
" However, to date, in Japan, factors influencing cholinergic symptoms, such as dosage of CPT-11, regular medications, and laboratory values indicating liver function, have not been studied."( [Factors Affecting Development of Cholinergic Symptoms after Irinotecan Administration].
Ishikura, K; Mizukami, Y; Okuyama, H; Tamura, K, 2018
)
0.72
"5 mmol/ml, 1 mmol/ml, 2 mmol /ml, 5 mmol/ml, and 10 mmol/ml irinotecan (CPT-11) were dosed in all colon cancer cell groups."( KDM5c inhibits multidrug resistance of colon cancer cell line by down-regulating ABCC1.
Cao, B; Guo, S; Li, Q; Lin, H; Wang, J; Yang, G; Yu, J, 2018
)
0.72
" The individualized dosing of CPT-11 is essential to ensure optimal pharmacotherapy in cancer patients, given the wide interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of this drug and its active metabolite SN-38."( Population pharmacokinetic model of irinotecan and its metabolites in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aldaz, A; Insausti, A; Oyaga-Iriarte, E; Sayar, O, 2019
)
0.79
" As for the biomarkers, carcinoembryonic antigen and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) smoothly declined immediately after the initial dosing in patients with a partial response or stable disease."( Multicenter open-label randomized phase II study of second-line panitumumab and irinotecan with or without fluoropyrimidines in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (PACIFIC study).
Hirata, K; Hotta, Y; Imasato, M; Ishibashi, K; Iwamoto, S; Maeda, H; Makiyama, A; Mishima, H; Morita, S; Morita, Y; Munemoto, Y; Nagasaka, T; Nagata, N; Sakamoto, J; Takemoto, H; Tanaka, C; Toyofuku, A; Yoshida, Y, 2019
)
0.74
" This translational toxicology model could be used for other antineoplastic drugs to simulate various clinical dosing scenarios before human studies and mitigate potential GI AEs."( A Citrulline-Based Translational Population System Toxicology Model for Gastrointestinal-Related Adverse Events Associated With Anticancer Treatments.
Abdul-Hadi, K; Brown, A; Guan, E; Wagoner, M; Yoneyama, T; Zhu, AZX, 2019
)
0.51
" These data indicate that the use of modified dosing FOLFIRINOX in advanced PC pts older than 75 appears to maintain similar toxicity and efficacy when compared to younger pts."( Modified FOLFIRINOX in pancreatic cancer patients Age 75 or older.
Fogelman, DR; Hess, KR; Ho, L; Javle, MM; Mizrahi, JD; Overman, MJ; Pant, S; Raghav, KPS; Rogers, JE; Shroff, RT; Varadhachary, GR; Wolff, RA, 2020
)
0.56
" Thereafter, salvage minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and 2-field lymph node dissection was performed, followed by oral apatinib plus S-1 at the prior dosage for 6 months."( S-1 plus apatinib followed by salvage esophagectomy for irinotecan-refractory small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A case report and review of the literature.
Gong, LB; Wu, W; Yu, GM; Zhang, C; Zhang, M, 2020
)
0.8
" Demographics, clinical and dosing characteristics, and treatment outcomes were collected."( Real-World Dosing Patterns and Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated With a Liposomal Irinotecan Regimen in the United States.
Ahn, D; Barzi, A; Bekaii-Saab, T; Corvino, FA; Mamlouk, K; Miksad, R; Pulgar, S; Surinach, A; Torres, AZ; Valderrama, A; Wang, S, 2020
)
0.77
" Evaluation of pharmacogenomically dosed perioperative gFOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and UGT1A1 genotype-directed irinotecan) to optimize efficacy while limiting toxic effects may have value."( Evaluation of the Association of Perioperative UGT1A1 Genotype-Dosed gFOLFIRINOX With Margin-Negative Resection Rates and Pathologic Response Grades Among Patients With Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.
Allen, K; Alpert, L; Catenacci, DVT; Chase, L; de Wilton Marsh, R; Ferguson, MK; Gordon, B; Hart, J; Karrison, T; Kindler, HL; Kipping-Johnson, K; Liao, CY; Lomnicki, S; Markevicius, U; Maron, SB; Moore, K; Narula, S; Peterson, B; Polite, BN; Posner, MC; Prachand, VN; Racette, C; Rampurwala, MM; Roggin, KK; Setia, N; Siddiqui, UD; Turaga, K; Xiao, SY, 2020
)
0.76
"In this study, perioperative pharmacogenomically dosed gFOLFIRINOX was feasible, providing downstaging with PRG 1 in more than one-third of patients and an R0 resection rate in 92% of patients."( Evaluation of the Association of Perioperative UGT1A1 Genotype-Dosed gFOLFIRINOX With Margin-Negative Resection Rates and Pathologic Response Grades Among Patients With Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.
Allen, K; Alpert, L; Catenacci, DVT; Chase, L; de Wilton Marsh, R; Ferguson, MK; Gordon, B; Hart, J; Karrison, T; Kindler, HL; Kipping-Johnson, K; Liao, CY; Lomnicki, S; Markevicius, U; Maron, SB; Moore, K; Narula, S; Peterson, B; Polite, BN; Posner, MC; Prachand, VN; Racette, C; Rampurwala, MM; Roggin, KK; Setia, N; Siddiqui, UD; Turaga, K; Xiao, SY, 2020
)
0.56
"Temporal control of drug dosing is indispensable for a successful combination therapy that utilizes cisplatin (CDDP) and irinotecan (IRN), with clinical evidence supporting a higher response rate when CDDP was administered prior to IRN."( Double-crosslinked nanocomposite hydrogels for temporal control of drug dosing in combination therapy.
Liu, J; Tang, X; Wu, C; Xu, K; Yang, L; Zhai, Z; Zhao, L; Zhong, W, 2020
)
0.77
" This pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study was performed to determine the effect of different G-CSF regimens on the incidence and duration of neutropenia following FOLFIRINOX administration in order to propose an optimal G-CSF dosing schedule."( Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia prevention: A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach.
Bengrine-Lefevre, L; Ghiringhelli, F; Macaire, P; Paris, J; Schmitt, A; Vincent, J, 2020
)
0.56
" Final model estimates were used to simulate different G-CSF dosing schedules for 1000 virtual subjects."( Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia prevention: A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach.
Bengrine-Lefevre, L; Ghiringhelli, F; Macaire, P; Paris, J; Schmitt, A; Vincent, J, 2020
)
0.56
" We aimed to improve FOLFOXIRI by optimization of the dosing and the sequence of drug administration."( Drug-Drug Interactions of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid and Oxaliplatin and Its Activity in Colorectal Carcinoma Treatment.
Nowak-Sliwinska, P; Ramzy, GM; Rausch, M; Zoetemelk, M, 2020
)
0.86
" Side effects associated with chemotherapy delays or modifications included thrombocytopenia (28%) and nausea/vomiting (19%), with temozolomide dosing most frequently modified."( Children with DIPG and high-grade glioma treated with temozolomide, irinotecan, and bevacizumab: the Seattle Children's Hospital experience.
Browd, SR; Cole, BL; Crotty, EE; Ellenbogen, RG; Ermoian, RP; Geyer, JR; Hauptman, JS; Leary, SES; Lee, A; Lockwood, CM; Millard, NE; Ojemann, JG; Olson, JM; Paulson, VA; Sato, AA; Vitanza, NA, 2020
)
0.79
" Whereas reductions of NTx dosage was more common in elderly patients in comparison 1 (p = 0."( Neoadjuvant therapy in elderly patients receiving FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer is feasible and lead to a similar oncological outcome compared to non-aged patients - Results of the
Ceyhan, GO; Damm, M; Kordes, M; Maggino, L; Moir, J; Rosendahl, J; Schorn, S; Weniger, M, 2020
)
0.56
" Dose reduction was defined as any decrease from initial dose; dose delay was any dosing delay >3 days from target date."( Early dose reduction/delay and the efficacy of liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and leucovorin in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): A post hoc analysis of NAPOLI-1.
Bekaii-Saab, T; Belanger, B; Blanc, JF; Chen, LT; de Jong, FA; Macarulla, T; Mirakhur, B; Siveke, JT, 2021
)
0.87
"Irinotecan is an anticancer drug for which significant benefits from personalised dosing are expected."( A simple, rapid and low-cost spectrophotometric method for irinotecan quantification in human plasma and in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
Argyropoulou, A; Gkotzamani, P; Karkalousos, P; Petro, V; Tsotsou, GE, 2021
)
2.31
" A single dosage induced significant improvement of anti-tumour activity (over either the free drugs or the iTSL without FUS-activation) in triple negative breast cancer xenografts tumours in mice."( Image-guided thermosensitive liposomes for focused ultrasound enhanced co-delivery of carboplatin and SN-38 against triple negative breast cancer in mice.
Amrahli, M; Cressey, P; Gedroyc, W; So, PW; Thanou, M; Wright, M, 2021
)
0.62
" The impact of proactive regulatory action, such as recommended dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), was also observable within the global database."( The Use of Subgroup Disproportionality Analyses to Explore the Sensitivity of a Global Database of Individual Case Safety Reports to Known Pharmacogenomic Risk Variants Common in Japan.
Aoki, Y; Chandler, RE; Lönnstedt, IM; Wakao, R, 2021
)
0.62
" Further approaches taken to improve the efficacy of 5-FU chemotherapy regimens have focused on optimising the route and dosing schedules and regulating folate metabolism."( Metastatic colorectal cancer: Advances in the folate-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy backbone.
de Gramont, A; Glimelius, B; Marshall, J; Stintzing, S; Yoshino, T, 2021
)
0.62
" Over the last 10 years, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of panitumumab has been studied to further evaluate its safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing regimen."( Panitumumab: A Review of Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacology Properties After Over a Decade of Experience in Patients with Solid Tumors.
Dutta, S; Kast, J; Upreti, VV, 2021
)
0.62
"Body surface area (BSA)-based dosing of irinotecan (IR) does not account for its pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variabilities."( Evaluation of pharmacogenomics and hepatic nuclear imaging-related covariates by population pharmacokinetic models of irinotecan and its metabolites.
Beale, PJ; Burge, ME; Campbell, I; Crowley, S; Cullinane, C; Hatzimihalis, A; Hicks, RJ; Jefford, M; Karapetis, CS; Liauw, W; Link, E; Liu, Z; Martin, JH; Matera, A; McLachlan, SA; Michael, M; Price, T; Thompson, M, 2022
)
1.2
"FOLFIRINOX and FOLFOXIRI are combination chemotherapy treatments that incorporate the same drug cocktail (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) but exploit an altered dosing regimen when used in the management of pancreatic and colorectal cancer, respectively."( A single microbubble formulation carrying 5-fluorouridine, Irinotecan and oxaliplatin to enable FOLFIRINOX treatment of pancreatic and colon cancer using ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction.
Callan, B; Callan, JF; Gao, J; Griffith, DM; Logan, KA; Love, M; McHale, AP; McKaig, T; Nesbitt, H; Taylor, M, 2021
)
1.06
" We provide an overview of current evidence and recommendations for individualized dosing of irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer patients."( Elucidating the role of pharmacogenetics in irinotecan efficacy and adverse events in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Páez, D; Riera, P, 2021
)
1.1
" Guidelines recommend FP dosing adjusted to genotype-predicted DPD activity based on four DPYD variants (rs3918290, rs55886062, rs67376798 and rs56038477)."( DPYD polymorphisms c.496A>G, c.2194G>A and c.85T>C and risk of severe adverse drug reactions in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine-based protocols.
Bilić, I; Božina, N; Ganoci, L; Lešnjaković, L; Pleština, S; Šimičević, L; Trkulja, V, 2022
)
0.72
" While the recommended dosing schedule for the triplet chemotherapy regimen with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) in combination with bevacizumab is well established, the optimal dosing of FOLFOXIRI in combination with anti-EGFR agents is unknown."( Triplet chemotherapy in combination with anti-EGFR agents for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Current evidence, advances, and future perspectives.
Cremolini, C; Esser, R; Falcone, A; Folprecht, G; Martinelli, E; Mazard, T; Modest, DP; Tsuji, A, 2022
)
0.93
"To determine the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics, and cost of UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan."( UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: A prospective safety and cost analysis in poor metaboliser patients.
Bins, S; Creemers, GJ; de Man, FM; de With, M; Deenen, MJ; Deiman, BALM; Gelderblom, H; Guchelaar, HJ; Houterman, S; Houtsma, D; Hövels, AM; Hulshof, EC; Koolen, SLW; Laven, MMJ; Luelmo, SAC; Mathijssen, RHJ; McLeod, HL; Shulman, K; Swen, JJ; Thijs, AMJ; van Schaik, RHN, 2022
)
1.22
" Systemic exposure of SN-38 of reduced dosing in UGT1A1 PMs was still slightly higher compared to a standard-dosed irinotecan patient cohort (difference: +32%)."( UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: A prospective safety and cost analysis in poor metaboliser patients.
Bins, S; Creemers, GJ; de Man, FM; de With, M; Deenen, MJ; Deiman, BALM; Gelderblom, H; Guchelaar, HJ; Houterman, S; Houtsma, D; Hövels, AM; Hulshof, EC; Koolen, SLW; Laven, MMJ; Luelmo, SAC; Mathijssen, RHJ; McLeod, HL; Shulman, K; Swen, JJ; Thijs, AMJ; van Schaik, RHN, 2022
)
1.21
"UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing significantly reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in UGT1A1 PM patients treated with irinotecan, results in a therapeutically effective systemic drug exposure, and is cost-saving."( UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan: A prospective safety and cost analysis in poor metaboliser patients.
Bins, S; Creemers, GJ; de Man, FM; de With, M; Deenen, MJ; Deiman, BALM; Gelderblom, H; Guchelaar, HJ; Houterman, S; Houtsma, D; Hövels, AM; Hulshof, EC; Koolen, SLW; Laven, MMJ; Luelmo, SAC; Mathijssen, RHJ; McLeod, HL; Shulman, K; Swen, JJ; Thijs, AMJ; van Schaik, RHN, 2022
)
1.21
" This translated to in vivo antitumor activity, with tumor control requiring continuous dosing and free plasma exposures, which correlated with induction of pCHK1, pRAD50, and γH2AX."( ATR Inhibitor AZD6738 (Ceralasertib) Exerts Antitumor Activity as a Monotherapy and in Combination with Chemotherapy and the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib.
Bargh-Dawson, H; Brown, E; Gerrard, J; Hughes, AM; Jones, GN; Lau, A; O'Connor, MJ; Odedra, R; Wallez, Y; Wijnhoven, PWG; Wilson, Z; Young, LA, 2022
)
0.72
"Original FOLFIRINOX (oFFX) is more toxic than other regimens for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC); therefore, a modified FFX (mFFX) regimen with a reduced dosage has been used in Japanese clinical practice."( Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of Original versus Modified FOLFIRINOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the NAPOLEON Study.
Arima, S; Fukahori, M; Honda, T; Ide, Y; Ido, A; Kawahira, M; Koga, F; Komori, A; Makiyama, A; Mitsugi, K; Mizuta, T; Nakazawa, J; Nio, K; Otsu, S; Otsuka, T; Shibuki, T; Shimokawa, M; Shirakawa, T; Taguchi, H; Tsuruta, N; Ueda, Y; Ureshino, N, 2023
)
0.91
" SNSS NAs have demonstrated a passive targeting effect on tumor tissues, a superior antitumor effect compared to irinotecan (CPT-11), and satisfactory biocompatibility with double dosage treatment."( Disulfide Bond-Based SN38 Prodrug Nanoassemblies with High Drug Loading and Reduction-Triggered Drug Release for Pancreatic Cancer Therapy.
Duan, HQ; Duan, XC; Li, XZ; Liu, JT; Qin, N; Zhong, ZX, 2023
)
1.12
" Pharmacokinetic-guided (PKG) dosing has demonstrated beneficial effects in other tumors, but scarce data is available in pancreatic cancer."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Aldaz, A; Arbea, L; Chopitea, A; Martí-Cruchaga, P; Pardo, F; Ponz-Sarvise, M; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J; Rotellar, F; Sala-Elarre, P; Subtil, JC; Urrizola, A; Vilalta-Lacarra, A; Zozaya, G, 2023
)
0.91
" 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) dosage was adjusted throughout neoadjuvant treatment according to pharmacokinetic parameters and Irinotecan (CPT-11) pharmacokinetic variables were retrospectively estimated."( Therapeutic drug monitoring of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Aldaz, A; Arbea, L; Chopitea, A; Martí-Cruchaga, P; Pardo, F; Ponz-Sarvise, M; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J; Rotellar, F; Sala-Elarre, P; Subtil, JC; Urrizola, A; Vilalta-Lacarra, A; Zozaya, G, 2023
)
1.12
"In this phase Ib study MODURATE, we optimized the dosing schedule and tested the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin treatment failure."( Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, and Biweekly Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: MODURATE, a Phase Ib Study.
Ando, M; Hamauchi, S; Honda, K; Kadowaki, S; Kawakami, T; Masuishi, T; Mori, K; Muro, K; Narita, Y; Onozawa, Y; Shirasu, H; Taniguchi, H; Todaka, A; Tsushima, T; Yamazaki, K; Yasui, H; Yokota, T, 2023
)
1.48
" The concomitant dosing schedule was discontinued because of dose-limiting toxicities in 2 of 2 patients treated."( Regorafenib plus Vincristine and Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients with Recurrent/Refractory Solid Tumors: An Innovative Therapy for Children with Cancer Study.
Bautista, F; Brennan, BJ; Campbell-Hewson, Q; Cañete Nieto, A; Casanova, M; Chung, JW; Corradini, N; Geoerger, B; Makin, G; Marshall, LV; Mueller, U; Ploeger, BA; Verschuur, AC; Zebger-Gong, H, 2023
)
1.19
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
apoptosis inducerAny substance that induces the process of apoptosis (programmed cell death) in multi-celled organisms.
EC 5.99.1.2 (DNA topoisomerase) inhibitorA topoisomerase inhibitor that inhibits the bacterial enzymes of the DNA topoisomerases, Type I class (EC 5.99.1.2) that catalyze ATP-independent breakage of one of the two strands of DNA, passage of the unbroken strand through the break, and rejoining of the broken strand. These bacterial enzymes reduce the topological stress in the DNA structure by relaxing negatively, but not positively, supercoiled DNA.
antineoplastic agentA substance that inhibits or prevents the proliferation of neoplasms.
prodrugA compound that, on administration, must undergo chemical conversion by metabolic processes before becoming the pharmacologically active drug for which it is a prodrug.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (7)

ClassDescription
pyranoindolizinoquinoline
N-acylpiperidine
carbamate esterAny ester of carbamic acid or its N-substituted derivatives.
tertiary alcoholA tertiary alcohol is a compound in which a hydroxy group, -OH, is attached to a saturated carbon atom which has three other carbon atoms attached to it.
tertiary amino compoundA compound formally derived from ammonia by replacing three hydrogen atoms by organyl groups.
delta-lactoneA lactone having a six-membered lactone ring.
ring assemblyTwo or more cyclic systems (single rings or fused systems) which are directly joined to each other by double or single bonds are named ring assemblies when the number of such direct ring junctions is one less than the number of cyclic systems involved.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (3)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Irinotecan Action Pathway2411
Irinotecan Metabolism Pathway2411
Irinotecan pathway05

Protein Targets (23)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency35.49060.100020.879379.4328AID588453; AID588456
Fumarate hydrataseHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.33170.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
PPM1D proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency18.55690.00529.466132.9993AID1347411
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.47030.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.41440.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259255; AID1259256
polyproteinZika virusPotency0.33170.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
67.9K proteinVaccinia virusPotency10.61010.00018.4406100.0000AID720579; AID720580
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency18.55690.00339.158239.8107AID1347411
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, AcetylcholinesteraseTetronarce californica (Pacific electric ray)Ki0.02640.02640.02640.0264AID977610
Solute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.70000.40003.10009.7000AID721751
Solute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)20.80000.21005.553710.0000AID721750
Solute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)74.60000.09003.72779.5000AID721749
Interstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)6.06000.00020.850210.0000AID625177
AcetylcholinesteraseTetronarce californica (Pacific electric ray)Ki0.02640.00000.76714.3000AID404434
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.55600.00001.15467.5858AID625154
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.21700.00000.79519.1201AID625154
Cytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)Ki24.00000.00011.41629.9000AID589114
Alpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)3.17100.00001.47257.8980AID625203
Alpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.46100.00030.483410.0000AID625203
AcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.82700.00000.933210.0000AID625193
AcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.05050.00001.27869.7300AID407780
Multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)43.25000.16003.95718.6000AID721748; AID721752
Multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.76670.01002.765610.0000AID721746; AID721747; AID721754
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
interferon gamma precursorHomo sapiens (human)AC5022.85500.128015.173038.6100AID1259418; AID1259420
DNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)CC50100.00000.80001.20293.2000AID56562
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (168)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
activation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activity involved in apoptotic processSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic cation transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
body fluid secretionSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
amine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
choline transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
epinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
histamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
histamine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
purine-containing compound transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid import across plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine import across plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
L-alpha-amino acid transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular detoxificationSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
establishment or maintenance of transmembrane electrochemical gradientSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
epinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
metanephric proximal tubule developmentSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
purine-containing compound transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic cation transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-carnitine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
acyl carnitine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
cellular detoxificationSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
histamine metabolic processSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monocarboxylic acid transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of appetiteSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
epinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
histamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
histamine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
epinephrine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
purine-containing compound transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular detoxificationSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysisInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein metabolic processInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix disassemblyInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
collagen catabolic processInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein-containing complex assemblyInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-AInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix organizationInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of locomotionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
lipid hydroxylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
lipid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
calcitriol biosynthetic process from calciolCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D catabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aflatoxin metabolic processCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
DNA topological changeDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin remodelingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
circadian rhythmDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
programmed cell deathDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphorylationDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-serine phosphorylationDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
circadian regulation of gene expressionDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic cleavageDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome segregationDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA replicationDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of smooth muscle contractionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell-cell signalingAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of norepinephrine secretionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of vasoconstrictionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
platelet activationAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
activation of protein kinase B activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of epinephrine secretionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor transactivationAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron differentiationAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of insulin secretionAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine catabolic process in synaptic cleftAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of receptor recyclingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
osteoblast developmentAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine catabolic processAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cell adhesionAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
synapse assemblyAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
receptor internalizationAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, cholinergicAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
amyloid precursor protein metabolic processAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein secretionAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
retina development in camera-type eyeAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol biosynthetic processLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cholesterol effluxLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cholesterol storageLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell differentiationLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
reverse cholesterol transportLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
medium-chain fatty acid metabolic processLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid biosynthetic processLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cholesterolLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to low-density lipoprotein particle stimulusLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol ester hydrolysis involved in cholesterol transportLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cholesterol metabolic processLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid secretionLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid catabolic processLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
proton transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic detoxification by transmembrane export across the plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
amino acid import across plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine import across plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-alpha-amino acid transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
proton transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine transmembrane transportMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic detoxification by transmembrane export across the plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (90)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
amine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
L-amino acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
pyrimidine nucleoside transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
choline transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
toxin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
secondary active organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
pyrimidine nucleoside transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
toxin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-carnitine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
toxin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
metalloendopeptidase activityInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase activityInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor activityMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
steroid hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid 4-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D3 25-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
caffeine oxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
quinine 3-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
testosterone 6-beta-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1-alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 23-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 8,9 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 11,12 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 14,15 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
aromatase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
vitamin D 24-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 16-alpha-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen 2-hydroxylase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
1,8-cineole 2-exo-monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
double-stranded DNA bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
single-stranded DNA bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA topoisomerase type I (single strand cut, ATP-independent) activityDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein serine/threonine kinase activityDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA binding, bendingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein domain specific bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
supercoiled DNA bindingDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
alpha2-adrenergic receptor activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-2A adrenergic receptor bindingAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epinephrine bindingAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activityAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
amyloid-beta bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
acetylcholinesterase activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cholinesterase activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
collagen bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
hydrolase activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
serine hydrolase activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
laminin bindingAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
sterol esterase activityLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
methylumbelliferyl-acetate deacetylase activityLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylesterase activityLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic ester hydrolase activityLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
antiporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
polyspecific organic cation:proton antiporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-amino acid transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
antiporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
L-arginine transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
polyspecific organic cation:proton antiporter activityMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (42)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
presynapseSolute carrier family 22 member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
lateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
presynapseSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear outer membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
endomembrane systemSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodySolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
presynapseSolute carrier family 22 member 3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrixInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceInterstitial collagenaseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
synapseMuscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 3A4Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear chromosomeDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
P-bodyDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
fibrillar centerDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
male germ cell nucleusDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
perikaryonDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein-DNA complexDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusDNA topoisomerase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAlpha-2C adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
basement membraneAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
membraneAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
neuromuscular junctionAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic cleftAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
synapseAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
side of membraneAcetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum lumenLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid dropletLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid dropletLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumLiver carboxylesterase 1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (674)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1811Experimentally measured binding affinity data derived from PDB2005Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 67, Issue:6
The crystal structure of the complex of the anticancer prodrug 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11) with Torpedo californica acetylcholinesterase provides a molecular explanation for its cholinergic action.
AID977610Experimentally measured binding affinity data (Ki) for protein-ligand complexes derived from PDB2005Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 67, Issue:6
The crystal structure of the complex of the anticancer prodrug 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11) with Torpedo californica acetylcholinesterase provides a molecular explanation for its cholinergic action.
AID1347124qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347123qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347111qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347135qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347114qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347118qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347121qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347122qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347126qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347112qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347117qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347140qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347115qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347113qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347138qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D caspase screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347125qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347137qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for Daoy cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347127qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347136qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347109qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347116qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347110qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for A673 cells)2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347141qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347139qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347119qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347128qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347129qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1079948Times to onset, minimal and maximal, observed in the indexed observations. [column 'DELAI' in source]
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1689310Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as organ related toxicity on lung morphology at 10 mg/kg, iv once a week for 3 weeks by H and E staining-based fluorescence microscopy2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1903714Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells measured in presence of 5 uM 2(((2-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1079932Highest frequency of moderate liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% BIOL' in source]
AID1903719Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells measured in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1693087Induction apoptosis in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in early apoptotic cells at 12 uM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin VFITC /PI staining with flow cytometry (Rvb = 4.08%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID167217Cytotoxic activity against human lymphoblast tumor cell line RPMI8402 after 4 days of treatment2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-22, Volume: 46, Issue:11
Nitro and amino substitution in the D-ring of 5-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)- 2,3-methylenedioxy-5H-dibenzo[c,h][1,6]naphthyridin-6-ones: effect on topoisomerase-I targeting activity and cytotoxicity.
AID1401536Antiproliferative activity against human HepG2 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1385817Antitumor activity against human SW620 cells xenografted in athymic nu/nu mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 50 mg/kg, ip administered weekly once 21 days relative to control2018ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-09, Volume: 9, Issue:8
Discovery of a Series of 3-Cinnoline Carboxamides as Orally Bioavailable, Highly Potent, and Selective ATM Inhibitors.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID480013Toxicity in NCR nu/nu mouse xenografted with human MDA-MB-435 cells assessed as average body weight at 20 mg/kg, ip administered 3 times a week for 4 weeks measured on day 31 (RVb = 23.9 +/- 1 g)2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
Macrocyclic pyridyl polyoxazoles: selective RNA and DNA G-quadruplex ligands as antitumor agents.
AID1194810Toxicity in human HT-29 cells xenografted mouse assessed as body weight level at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 10 (Rvb = 22.4 +/- 1.3 g)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID586351Cytotoxicity against human bone marrow cell by CFU-GM assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID121417Evaluated for survival time of P388/ADM Leukemia implanted female CDF1 Mice at a dose of 50 mg/kg2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1903692Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells in presence of 30 uM 3-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-((4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)carbamothioyl)benzamide measured after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID320892Antitumor activity against human HT29 cells xenografted nu/nu mouse assessed as Cdc2 PY15 phosphorylation level at 20 mg/kg, iv after 30 mins by Western blotting2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of soluble 8-substituted 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-9-hydroxypyrrolo[3,4-c]carbazole-1,3(2H,6H)-diones as inhibitors of the Wee1 and Chk1 checkpoint kinases.
AID1561987Drug uptake in human A549 cells assessed as maximum emission peaks at 430 nm at 5 uM by fluorescence emission spectral analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1689334Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as increase in caspase-9 level at 5 uM incubated for 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1443371Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by sulforhodamine B assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 7-(N-[(substituted-sulfonyl)piperazinyl]-methyl)-camptothecin derivatives.
AID586346Cytotoxicity against human MES-SA/Dx5 cells overexpressing MDR1 after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1903670Synergistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells measured after 6 days in presence of 5 uM KU60019 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1903720Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells assessed as combination index measured in presence of 5 uM 2(((2-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID121350The tumor growth value was reported as ratio of surviving days of mice treated with anticancer drug to surviving days of control mice2002Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-06, Volume: 12, Issue:9
Novel camptothecin derivatives. Part 1: oxyalkanoic acid esters of camptothecin and their in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity.
AID1693074Anticancer activity against human T84 cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID1273542Antiproliferative activity against human HCT116 cells after 24 to 72 hrs by SRB assay2015Journal of natural products, Dec-24, Volume: 78, Issue:12
Antitumor Activity of Americanin A Isolated from the Seeds of Phytolacca americana by Regulating the ATM/ATR Signaling Pathway and the Skp2-p27 Axis in Human Colon Cancer Cells.
AID110084Antitumor activity evaluated as tumor weight on day 21 of Meth A Fibrosarcoma in BALB/c mice at a dose of 25 mg/kg administered intravenously on day 52004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1562051Toxicity in kidney of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as cell lysis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1702782Cytotoxicity against human KB cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 187Design, synthesis and antineoplastic activity of novel 20(S)-acylthiourea derivatives of camptothecin.
AID1079931Moderate liver toxicity, defined via clinical-chemistry results: ALT or AST serum activity 6 times the normal upper limit (N) or alkaline phosphatase serum activity of 1.7 N. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'BIOL' in source]
AID721750Inhibition of human OCT1-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells after 3 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID1724960Antitumor activity against human COLO205 cells xenografted in SCID/beige mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 30 mg/kg/day, ip administered as 4 doses with 3 days interval relative to control2020ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-08, Volume: 11, Issue:10
Discovery of A-1331852, a First-in-Class, Potent, and Orally-Bioavailable BCL-X
AID1883364Antiproliferative activity against human HCT-15 cells harboring wild type beta-catenin assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by SRB assay
AID1903729Synergistic cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells measured in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1182628Antitumor activity against human HCT116 cells xenografted in nu/nu mouse assessed as tumor regression at 100 mg/kg, iv dosed once every week2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel 20(s)-sulfonylamidine derivatives of camptothecin as potent antitumor agents.
AID1433664Antitumor activity against human BGC823 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as tumor volume at 50 mg/kg, ip administered once in a week for two weeks starting from 6 days post tumor transplantation measured 27 to 30 days post tumor transplanta2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel substituted uracil-1'(N)-acetic acid ester derivatives of 20(S)-camptothecins.
AID477295Octanol-water partition coefficient, log P of the compound2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 45, Issue:4
QSPR modeling of octanol/water partition coefficient of antineoplastic agents by balance of correlations.
AID121407Evaluated for survival time of P388 Leukemia implanted female CDF1 Mice at a dose of 100 mg/kg2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1286294Antiproliferative activity against human T84 cells assessed as cellular DNA content after 96 hrs by CyQUANT NF fluorescence assay relative to control2016Journal of natural products, Jan-22, Volume: 79, Issue:1
Amorfrutin C Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Proliferation in Colon Cancer Cells through Targeting Mitochondria.
AID480007Antitumor activity against human MDA-MB-435 cells xenografted in NCR nu/nu mouse at 20 mg/kg, ip administered 3 times a week for 4 weeks measured after 35 days post-implantation relative to control2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
Macrocyclic pyridyl polyoxazoles: selective RNA and DNA G-quadruplex ligands as antitumor agents.
AID395829Growth inhibition of human T24 cells after 4 days by MTT assay2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 43, Issue:11
First synthesis of novel spin-labeled derivatives of camptothecin as potential antineoplastic agents.
AID121416Evaluated for survival time of P388/ADM Leukemia implanted female CDF1 Mice at a dose of 25 mg/kg2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID480005Antitumor activity against human MDA-MB-435 cells xenografted in NCR nu/nu mouse assessed as tumor volume at 20 mg/kg, ip administered 3 times a week for 4 weeks measured after 35 days post-implantation (RVb = > 1350 mm'3)2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
Macrocyclic pyridyl polyoxazoles: selective RNA and DNA G-quadruplex ligands as antitumor agents.
AID718857Cytotoxicity against human KBVIN cells by SRB assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 22, Issue:24
Design and one-pot synthesis of new 7-acyl camptothecin derivatives as potent cytotoxic agents.
AID1689313Inhibition of topoisomerase 1 (unknown origin) assessed as relaxation of supercoiled plasmid pBR322 DNA at 150 uM incubated for 30 mins by Western blot analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1221964Transporter substrate index ratio of permeability from basolateral to apical side in human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1273544Antiproliferative activity against human SW480 cells after 24 to 72 hrs by SRB assay2015Journal of natural products, Dec-24, Volume: 78, Issue:12
Antitumor Activity of Americanin A Isolated from the Seeds of Phytolacca americana by Regulating the ATM/ATR Signaling Pathway and the Skp2-p27 Axis in Human Colon Cancer Cells.
AID1693101Induction of cell cycle arrest in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in number of cells at G0/G1 phase at 6 uM measured after 72 hrs by PI staining using flow cytometry (Rvb = 60.05%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID680747TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of E1S uptake (irinotecan 10 u M) in OATP1B1-expressing HEK293 cells2004Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
Involvement of organic anion transporting polypeptides in the transport of troglitazone sulfate: implications for understanding troglitazone hepatotoxicity.
AID1079949Proposed mechanism(s) of liver damage. [column 'MEC' in source]
AID1903677Additive cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index measured after 6 days in presence of 5 uM KU55933 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1703327Antitumor activity against human HepG2 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 202Oligosaccharide-camptothecin conjugates as potential antineoplastic drugs: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1561995Cytotoxicity agains human HL7702 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by SRB assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1221977Transporter substrate index of efflux ratio in human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of BCRP inhibitor Ko1432011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1903668Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells measured after 6 days in presence of 5 uM 2(((24(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1562042In vivo inhibition of HSP90 in mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as increase in HSP70 protein expression at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post last dose by Western blot analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID537380Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 3 days by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-11, Volume: 53, Issue:21
Selection of evodiamine as a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor by structure-based virtual screening and hit optimization of evodiamine derivatives as antitumor agents.
AID1239183Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-435 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-27, Volume: 58, Issue:16
Scaffold Diversity Inspired by the Natural Product Evodiamine: Discovery of Highly Potent and Multitargeting Antitumor Agents.
AID362323Antitumor activity against human MDA-MB-231 cells xenografted in athymic nude mouse assessed as tumor volume on day 14 at initial dose of 20 mg/kg, ip qd X 5/week (450 mg/kg last dose)2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Syntheses and biological evaluation of topoisomerase I-targeting agents related to 11-[2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl]-2,3-dimethoxy-8,9-methylenedioxy-11H-isoquino[4,3-c]cinnolin-12-one (ARC-31).
AID540218Clearance in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1693092Induction apoptosis in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in live cells at 6 uM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin VFITC /PI staining with flow cytometry (Rvb = 92.6%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID1401550Antiproliferative activity against human OCI-LY3 cells at 10 uM after 72 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1754551Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth measured after 72 hrs2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 46New camptothecin derivatives for generalized oncological chemotherapy: Synthesis, stereochemistry and biology.
AID1689289Antitumor activity against human SK-OV-3 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as reduction in tumor volume at 20 mg/kg, iv once a week for 3 weeks relative to control2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID588974Substrates of transporters of clinical importance in the absorption and disposition of drugs, MDR12010Nature reviews. Drug discovery, Mar, Volume: 9, Issue:3
Membrane transporters in drug development.
AID586334Cytotoxicity against human H460 cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID586350Resistance ratio of of IC50 for human H69AR cells overexpressing MDR1 after 72 hrs s to IC50 for human H69 cells after 72 hrs2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1239181Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-27, Volume: 58, Issue:16
Scaffold Diversity Inspired by the Natural Product Evodiamine: Discovery of Highly Potent and Multitargeting Antitumor Agents.
AID1562111Down regulation of topoisomerase 1 expression in mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post last dose by Western blot analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1401552Antiproliferative activity against human KM-H2 cells at 10 uM after 72 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1177903Antitumor activity against human HCT116 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as survival at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1689325Cell cycle arrest in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as cell accumulation at G2 phase at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry analysis (Rvb = 10.27%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1903654Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index measured after 2 days in presence of 5 uM 2(((24(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1903680Synergistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 9 days in presence of 5 uM KU60019 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID453824Antiproliferative activity against human HepG2 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 17, Issue:21
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-arylindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID721752Inhibition of human MATE2K-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells after 1.5 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID1903663Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells assessed as combination index measured after 3 days in presence of 5 uM KU55933 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1447299Antiproliferative activity against human ZR-7530 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 27, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and evaluation of 4-substituted anthra[2,1-c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-dione derivatives as novel non-camptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors.
AID426640Toxicity in mouse administered as bolus iv injection once per week for 3 weeks2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:10
Synthesis and biological activities of a pH-dependently activated water-soluble prodrug of a novel hexacyclic camptothecin analog.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1484046Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by MTS assay relative to control2017Journal of natural products, 02-24, Volume: 80, Issue:2
Glycybridins A-K, Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Glycyrrhiza glabra.
AID721745Ratio of Cmax unbound to IC50 for human MATE1-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID217357Compound was tested in vitro for cytotoxicity against VM46 subline of HCT116 (taxol-sensitive) at a drug concentration producing 50% inhibition of colony formation2002Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-06, Volume: 12, Issue:9
Novel camptothecin derivatives. Part 1: oxyalkanoic acid esters of camptothecin and their in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity.
AID1428729Drug excretion in human urine upto 48 hrs2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 27, Issue:4
The long story of camptothecin: From traditional medicine to drugs.
AID678800TP_TRANSPORTER: increase of cytotoxicity by GF120918 in MX3 cells2001Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, Apr, Volume: 7, Issue:4
Circumvention of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)-mediated resistance to camptothecins in vitro using non-substrate drugs or the BCRP inhibitor GF120918.
AID1464540Cytotoxicity against human KB cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Design, semisynthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 10-fluorocamptothecin derivatives.
AID1464538Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Design, semisynthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 10-fluorocamptothecin derivatives.
AID1462688Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 27, Issue:17
Design, synthesis, and cytotoxic activity of novel 7-substituted camptothecin derivatives incorporating piperazinyl-sulfonylamidine moieties.
AID679166TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Estrone-3-sulfate uptake(Estrone-3-sulfate: 9.2nM) in Xenopus laevis oocytes2004Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
Involvement of organic anion transporting polypeptides in the transport of troglitazone sulfate: implications for understanding troglitazone hepatotoxicity.
AID540221Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID634881Growth inhibition of human A549 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 19, Issue:24
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-aryl-11-iminoindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID537382Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-435 cells after 3 days by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-11, Volume: 53, Issue:21
Selection of evodiamine as a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor by structure-based virtual screening and hit optimization of evodiamine derivatives as antitumor agents.
AID409907Cytotoxicity against human KBV1 cells by MTT method2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 16, Issue:18
11-Substituted 2,3-dimethoxy-8,9-methylenedioxybenzo[i]phenanthridine derivatives as novel topoisomerase I-targeting agents.
AID456232Activity at human recombinant CES1 expressed in baculovirus-infected Spodoptera frugiperda Sf21 cells assessed as substrate hydrolysis by fluorescence assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 18, Issue:1
In silico prediction of human carboxylesterase-1 (hCES1) metabolism combining docking analyses and MD simulations.
AID1903695Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 9 days in presence of 3-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-((4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)carbamothioyl)benzamide by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1530421Growth inhibition of human HT-29 cells at 10 ug/ml by MTT assay relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 161Research advances on anticancer activities of matrine and its derivatives: An updated overview.
AID1781525Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H146 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1194811Toxicity in human HT-29 cells xenografted mouse assessed as body weight level at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 14 (Rvb = 22.7 +/- 1.5 g)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID1194795Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor volume at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 21 (Rvb = 1272+/- 273 mm3)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID721743Ratio of Cmax unbound to IC50 for human MATE1-mediated [14]-metformin uptake expressed in HEK293 cells2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID702840Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-435 cells incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-13, Volume: 55, Issue:17
New tricks for an old natural product: discovery of highly potent evodiamine derivatives as novel antitumor agents by systemic structure-activity relationship analysis and biological evaluations.
AID1301466Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 24 hrs by MTS assay2016Journal of natural products, Feb-26, Volume: 79, Issue:2
Bioactive Constituents of Glycyrrhiza uralensis (Licorice): Discovery of the Effective Components of a Traditional Herbal Medicine.
AID1546667Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2020Journal of natural products, 01-24, Volume: 83, Issue:1
Antcamphorols A-K, Cytotoxic and ROS Scavenging Triterpenoids from
AID1177868Cytotoxicity against human HCT116 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by Alamar Blue assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1079942Steatosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'STEAT' in source]
AID1194794Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor volume at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 17 (Rvb = 807 +/- 197 mm3)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID721747Inhibition of human MATE1-mediated [14]-metformin uptake expressed in HEK293 cells after 1.5 mins by scintillation counting analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID1177863Cytotoxicity against human PC3 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by Alamar Blue assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1689283Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells assessed as reduction in cell growth by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1401534Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID679121TP_TRANSPORTER: transepithelial transport (basal to apical) in Mdr1a-expressing LLC-PK1 cells2003Pharmaceutical research, Jun, Volume: 20, Issue:6
Effect of P-glycoprotein modulator, cyclosporin A, on the gastrointestinal excretion of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 in rats.
AID307322Growth inhibition of MCF7 cells after 4 days2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 15, Issue:12
Synthesis and topoisomerase poisoning activity of A-ring and E-ring substituted luotonin A derivatives.
AID1401554Antiproliferative activity against human MM432 cells at 10 uM after 72 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1903694Synergistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 3 days in presence of 3-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-((4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)carbamothioyl)benzamide by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID540216Clearance in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1693088Induction apoptosis in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in live cells at 12 uM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin VFITC /PI staining with flow cytometry (Rvb = 92.6%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID648275Growth inhibition of Drosophila melanogaster expressing Hrb87F mutant KG02089 assessed as reduction in eclosion rate at 25 uM after 15 days2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 19, Issue:24
Camptothecin (CPT) directly binds to human heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNP A1) and inhibits the hnRNP A1/topoisomerase I interaction.
AID1079934Highest frequency of acute liver toxicity observed during clinical trials, expressed as a percentage. [column '% AIGUE' in source]
AID729761Toxicity in nude mouse xenografted with human A549 cells assessed as body weight loss at 60 mg/kg, iv tid administered 2 days measured for 20 days2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 56, Issue:4
Novel antitumor indolizino[6,7-b]indoles with multiple modes of action: DNA cross-linking and topoisomerase I and II inhibition.
AID1562049Toxicity in kidney of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as tissue necrosis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1079937Severe hepatitis, defined as possibly life-threatening liver failure or through clinical observations. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'MASS' in source]
AID1781530Cytotoxicity against human 786-0 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1903681Synergistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 9 days in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1689294Induction of mitochondrial membrane potential loss in human SK-OV-3 cells at 10 uM measured after 24 hrs by JC-1 staining based flow cytometry analysis (Rvb = 97.87%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1292188Antitumor activity against human HCT116 cells xenografted in BALB/c mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 12.5 mg/kg, ip twice weekly for 4 weeks measured 24 hrs post last dose relative to control2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, May-23, Volume: 114Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel benzimidazole-2-substituted phenyl or pyridine propyl ketene derivatives as antitumour agents.
AID1194813Toxicity in human HT-29 cells xenografted mouse assessed as body weight level at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 21 (Rvb = 21.2 +/- 1.6 g)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID48321Specific activity (hydrolysis) by purified carboxylesterase isozyme RH1 against microsomes in rat liver1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a new class of camptothecin derivatives, the long-chain fatty acid esters of 10-hydroxycamptothecin, as a potent prodrug candidate, and their in vitro metabolic conversion by carboxylesterases.
AID540220Clearance in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1703332Inhibition of human recombinant Topoisomerase 1 using supercoiled pBR322 DNA as substrate at 100 uM incubated for 30 mins by ethidium bromide staining based agarose gel electrophoresis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 202Oligosaccharide-camptothecin conjugates as potential antineoplastic drugs: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation.
AID1273650Antitumor activity against human HCT116 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 10 mg/kg, ip administered once per week measured on day 412015Journal of natural products, Dec-24, Volume: 78, Issue:12
Antitumor Activity of Americanin A Isolated from the Seeds of Phytolacca americana by Regulating the ATM/ATR Signaling Pathway and the Skp2-p27 Axis in Human Colon Cancer Cells.
AID1401591Resistance index, ratio of IC50 for human A2780/DX cells to IC50 for human A2780 cells2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1171738Antiproliferative activity against human K562 cells after 72 hrs2014Journal of natural products, Dec-26, Volume: 77, Issue:12
Injury-induced biosynthesis of methyl-branched polyene pigments in a white-rotting basidiomycete.
AID586342Cytotoxicity against human IGROV1 cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1177869Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for vinblastine-resistant human CCRF-CEM cells to IC50 for human CCRF-CEM cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1562066Toxicity in lung of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as cell lysis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1079939Cirrhosis, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CIRRH' in source]
AID1903687Synergistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index in presence of 10 uM 3-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-((4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)carbamothioyl)benzamide measured after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1215100Terminal elimination rate constant in cancer patient with severe renal failure administered as infusion after 0.25 to 1.5 hrs by RP-HPLC analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Delayed elimination of SN-38 in cancer patients with severe renal failure.
AID1917038Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 241Recent advances in combretastatin A-4 codrugs for cancer therapy.
AID1561994Antiproliferative activity against human Capan1 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by SRB assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1221960Apparent permeability from apical to basolateral side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1361516Antitumor activity against human HepG2 cells xenografted in BALB/C nude mouse assessed as tumor weight at 40 mg/kg, ip treated twice per week for 25 days (Rvb = 0.84 +/- 0.09 g)2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-05, Volume: 156Novel indolo-sophoridinic scaffold as Topo I inhibitors: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation as anticancer agents.
AID729747Inhibition of DNA topoisomerase 1 (unknown origin)-mediated relaxation of supercoiled pHOT DNA at 25 to 100 uM after 30 to 45 mins by agarose gel electrophoresis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 56, Issue:4
Novel antitumor indolizino[6,7-b]indoles with multiple modes of action: DNA cross-linking and topoisomerase I and II inhibition.
AID586335Cytotoxicity against human PC3 cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID321332Antitumor activity against human MCF7 cells after 4 hrs by MTT assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
New homocamptothecins: synthesis, antitumor activity, and molecular modeling.
AID1401542Antiproliferative activity against human U2932 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1401537Antiproliferative activity against human A2780 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1702783Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-231 cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 187Design, synthesis and antineoplastic activity of novel 20(S)-acylthiourea derivatives of camptothecin.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1221969Apparent permeability from basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of BCRP inhibitor Ko1432011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID362324Antitumor activity against human MDA-MB-231 cells xenografted in athymic nude mouse assessed as tumor volume on day 21 at initial dose of 20 mg/kg, ip qd X 5/week (450 mg/kg total dose)2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Syntheses and biological evaluation of topoisomerase I-targeting agents related to 11-[2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl]-2,3-dimethoxy-8,9-methylenedioxy-11H-isoquino[4,3-c]cinnolin-12-one (ARC-31).
AID1562050Toxicity in kidney of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as abnormality at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1194808Toxicity in human HT-29 cells xenografted mouse assessed as body weight level at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 3 (Rvb = 20.7 +/- 1.2 g)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID1177895Toxicity in nude mouse xenografted with human HCT116 cells assessed as change in body weight at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days measured on day 31 relative to control2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID404434Inhibition of Torpedo californica AChE2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-12, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Exploiting protein fluctuations at the active-site gorge of human cholinesterases: further optimization of the design strategy to develop extremely potent inhibitors.
AID1221963Transporter substrate index ratio of permeability from apical to basolateral side in human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1079945Animal toxicity known. [column 'TOXIC' in source]
AID1903657Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index measured after 2 days in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID453829Cytotoxicity against human MRC5 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 17, Issue:21
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-arylindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID634951Growth inhibition of human Hep3B cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 19, Issue:24
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-aryl-11-iminoindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID1519254Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs in hypoxia condition by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 185Multigram scale synthesis of polycyclic lactones and evaluation of antitumor and other biological properties.
AID1428728Mean residence time in human2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 27, Issue:4
The long story of camptothecin: From traditional medicine to drugs.
AID1689309Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as organ related toxicity on heart morphology at 10 mg/kg, iv once a week for 3 weeks by H and E staining-based fluorescence microscopy2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1301463Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 24 hrs by MTS assay2016Journal of natural products, Feb-26, Volume: 79, Issue:2
Bioactive Constituents of Glycyrrhiza uralensis (Licorice): Discovery of the Effective Components of a Traditional Herbal Medicine.
AID1903721Additive cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells assessed as combination index measured in presence of 5 uM KU55933 after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1689284Cytotoxicity against human MCF-7 cells assessed as reduction in cell growth by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1883362Antiproliferative activity against human RKO cells harboring wild type beta-catenin assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by SRB assay
AID1689298Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as increase in Bax level at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1075855Inhibition of recombinant human DNA top1-mediated relaxation of pBR322 plasmid at 100 uM after 30 mins by agarose gel electrophoresis2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 24, Issue:5
Further constituents of Galianthe thalictroides (Rubiaceae) and inhibition of DNA topoisomerases I and IIα by its cytotoxic β-carboline alkaloids.
AID1530419Growth inhibition of human HT-29 cells at 2.5 ug/ml by MTT assay relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 161Research advances on anticancer activities of matrine and its derivatives: An updated overview.
AID721746Inhibition of human MATE1-mediated [14]-metformin uptake expressed in polarized MDCK2 cells after 5 mins by liquid scintillation counting analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID480009Toxicity in NCR nu/nu mouse xenografted with human MDA-MB-435 cells assessed as average body weight at 20 mg/kg, ip administered 3 times a week for 4 weeks measured on day 17 (RVb = 22 +/- 1.8 g)2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
Macrocyclic pyridyl polyoxazoles: selective RNA and DNA G-quadruplex ligands as antitumor agents.
AID586337Cytotoxicity against human SK-MEL-2 cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID634570Antitumor activity against human SW620 cells xenografted in nude SCID mouse assessed as delay in tumor growth at 12.5 mg/kg, ip2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-22, Volume: 54, Issue:24
Structure-guided evolution of potent and selective CHK1 inhibitors through scaffold morphing.
AID1177862Cytotoxicity against vinblastine-resistant human CCRF-CEM cells assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by Alamar Blue assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1401553Antiproliferative activity against human DG75 cells at 10 uM after 72 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1693090Induction apoptosis in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in late apoptotic cells at 6 uM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin VFITC /PI staining with flow cytometry (Rvb = 3.18%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID1903661Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 3 days in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID702841Cytotoxicity against human HCT116 cells incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-13, Volume: 55, Issue:17
New tricks for an old natural product: discovery of highly potent evodiamine derivatives as novel antitumor agents by systemic structure-activity relationship analysis and biological evaluations.
AID1562107Prodrug release in mouse plasma xenografted with human HCT116 cells assessed as increase in 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin level at 15 mg/kg, iv administered as single dose and measured after 30 mins to 72 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1754554Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth measured after 72 hrs2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 46New camptothecin derivatives for generalized oncological chemotherapy: Synthesis, stereochemistry and biology.
AID1903674Synergistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index measured after 6 days in presence of 5 uM KU60019 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1484048Antiproliferative activity against human SW480 cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by MTS assay relative to control2017Journal of natural products, 02-24, Volume: 80, Issue:2
Glycybridins A-K, Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Glycyrrhiza glabra.
AID699539Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1903691Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index in presence of 10 uM 3-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-((4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)carbamothioyl)benzamide measured after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1177866Cytotoxicity against human H460 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by Alamar Blue assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID406727Cytotoxicity against human LS174T cells after 96 hrs by MTT assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jul-01, Volume: 16, Issue:13
In vitro and in vivo anti-tumoral activities of imidazo[1,2-a]quinoxaline, imidazo[1,5-a]quinoxaline, and pyrazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline derivatives.
AID721748Inhibition of human MATE2K-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells up to 500 uM after 1.5 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID320893Antitumor activity against human HT29 cells xenografted nu/nu mouse assessed as Cdc2 PY15 phosphorylation level at 10 mg/kg, iv after 30 mins by Western blotting2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of soluble 8-substituted 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-9-hydroxypyrrolo[3,4-c]carbazole-1,3(2H,6H)-diones as inhibitors of the Wee1 and Chk1 checkpoint kinases.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588975Substrates of transporters of clinical importance in the absorption and disposition of drugs, BCRP2010Nature reviews. Drug discovery, Mar, Volume: 9, Issue:3
Membrane transporters in drug development.
AID1194781Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as relative tumor increment rate at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment relative to untreated control2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID1194812Toxicity in human HT-29 cells xenografted mouse assessed as body weight level at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 17 (Rvb = 22 +/- 1.7 g)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID1177262Antitumor activity against human NCI-H1299 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 50 mg/kg, po qd from day 28 to 41 after tumor inoculation in presence of 10 mg/kg irinotecan2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-08, Volume: 6, Issue:1
Pyrimidine-based tricyclic molecules as potent and orally efficacious inhibitors of wee1 kinase.
AID1401540Antiproliferative activity against human Maver2 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID679164TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in OATP1B1-expressing HEK293 cell2004Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
Involvement of organic anion transporting polypeptides in the transport of troglitazone sulfate: implications for understanding troglitazone hepatotoxicity.
AID115120Compound was tested in vivo for antitumor activity, reported as maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in mice injected intravenously with drug2002Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-06, Volume: 12, Issue:9
Novel camptothecin derivatives. Part 1: oxyalkanoic acid esters of camptothecin and their in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity.
AID1197745Inhibition of human OATP1B3-mediated [3H]CCK-8 at 100 uM after 5 mins relative to control2015European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-06, Volume: 92Interaction of human organic anion transporter polypeptides 1B1 and 1B3 with antineoplastic compounds.
AID321330Antitumor activity against human A549 cells after 4 hrs by MTT assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
New homocamptothecins: synthesis, antitumor activity, and molecular modeling.
AID481181Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-435 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Phosphate ester derivatives of homocamptothecin: synthesis, solution stabilities and antitumor activities.
AID120412Ratio between mean survival days of treated group and control group at a dose of 50 mg/kg2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1903665Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells assessed as combination index measured after 3 days in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID721753Inhibition of human MATE1-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells at 20 uM after 1.5 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID1273545Antiproliferative activity against human HCT15 cells after 24 to 72 hrs by SRB assay2015Journal of natural products, Dec-24, Volume: 78, Issue:12
Antitumor Activity of Americanin A Isolated from the Seeds of Phytolacca americana by Regulating the ATM/ATR Signaling Pathway and the Skp2-p27 Axis in Human Colon Cancer Cells.
AID540219Volume of distribution at steady state in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1635579Antitumor activity against human SW620 cells xenografted in immunocompromised athymic Swiss nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 50 mg/kg, ip once in a week for 3 weeks regime starting day 1 post xenograft2016Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-14, Volume: 59, Issue:13
Discovery of Novel 3-Quinoline Carboxamides as Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable Inhibitors of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) Kinase.
AID1903662Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells assessed as combination index measured after 3 days in presence of 5 uM 2(((24(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1484047Antiproliferative activity against human MCF7 cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by MTS assay relative to control2017Journal of natural products, 02-24, Volume: 80, Issue:2
Glycybridins A-K, Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Glycyrrhiza glabra.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1903693Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index in presence of 30 uM 3-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-((4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)carbamothioyl)benzamide measured after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1693073Anticancer activity against human SW-620 cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID719537Toxicity in athymic mouse xenografted with human HT-29 cells assessed as body weight loss at 12.5 mg/kg, ip tid for 7 days2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Discovery of 3-alkoxyamino-5-(pyridin-2-ylamino)pyrazine-2-carbonitriles as selective, orally bioavailable CHK1 inhibitors.
AID1883366Antiproliferative activity against human LS174T cells harboring beta-catenin mutant assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by SRB assay
AID1079938Chronic liver disease either proven histopathologically, or through a chonic elevation of serum amino-transferase activity after 6 months. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHRON' in source]
AID1854857Antiproliferative activity against etoposide/cisplatin combination-resistant human NCI-H446 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth incubated for 72 hrs by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 241Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 7-substituted 10,11-methylenedioxy-camptothecin derivatives against drug-resistant small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo.
AID1689286Cytotoxicity against human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as reduction in cell growth by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID481180Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Phosphate ester derivatives of homocamptothecin: synthesis, solution stabilities and antitumor activities.
AID1903652Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells measured after 2 days in presence of 5 uM KU60019 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID120410Ratio between mean survival days of treated group and control group at a dose of 25 mg/kg2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1401546Antiproliferative activity against human DG75 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1562071Toxicity in spleen of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as cell lysis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1221970Efflux ratio of permeability from apical to basolateral side over basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of BCRP inhibitor Ko1432011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID678940TP_TRANSPORTER: decrease in biliary excretion in mdr1a/1b(-/-) mouse2002Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, Apr, Volume: 49, Issue:4
Biliary transport of irinotecan and metabolites in normal and P-glycoprotein-deficient mice.
AID1079940Granulomatous liver disease, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'GRAN' in source]
AID1903730Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells assessed as combination index measured in presence of 5 uM 2(((2-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID679982TP_TRANSPORTER: intracellular accumulation in KB-3-1 and MRP1-expressing KB-3-1 cells1999Molecular pharmacology, May, Volume: 55, Issue:5
ATP-Dependent efflux of CPT-11 and SN-38 by the multidrug resistance protein (MRP) and its inhibition by PAK-104P.
AID245823Percent tumor-weight inhibition in mouse with tumor sarcoma-180 after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection at a dose of 40 mg/Kg2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 15, Issue:13
Synthesis and antitumor activity of the hexacyclic camptothecin derivatives.
AID1519255Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 of antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells in normoxia to IC50 of antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells in hypoxia condition2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 185Multigram scale synthesis of polycyclic lactones and evaluation of antitumor and other biological properties.
AID480011Toxicity in NCR nu/nu mouse xenografted with human MDA-MB-435 cells assessed as average body weight at 20 mg/kg, ip administered 3 times a week for 4 weeks measured on day 24 (RVb = 22.5 +/- 1.5 g)2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
Macrocyclic pyridyl polyoxazoles: selective RNA and DNA G-quadruplex ligands as antitumor agents.
AID307321Growth inhibition of HeLa cells after 4 days2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 15, Issue:12
Synthesis and topoisomerase poisoning activity of A-ring and E-ring substituted luotonin A derivatives.
AID1689326Cell cycle arrest in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as cell accumulation at S phase at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry analysis (Rvb = 22.96%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1781527Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H526 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID56880Effective concentration required to cleave DNA, mediated by human DNA topoisomerase I (TOP1) reported as REC i.e. concentration relative to topotecan (assumed as 1)2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-22, Volume: 46, Issue:11
Nitro and amino substitution in the D-ring of 5-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)- 2,3-methylenedioxy-5H-dibenzo[c,h][1,6]naphthyridin-6-ones: effect on topoisomerase-I targeting activity and cytotoxicity.
AID1883367Antiproliferative activity against human CCD-841CoN cells assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by SRB assay
AID1781519Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H226 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1194790Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor volume at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 3 (Rvb = 168 +/- 46 mm3)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID1562068Toxicity in lung of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear fragmentation at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID114264In vivo antitumor activity against subcutaneous Colon 38 tumors in mice determined as delay in growth after 65 mg/kg/day dose given as 3 times in a day for 4 days2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-13, Volume: 46, Issue:6
Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of carboxamide derivatives of benzo[b][1,6]naphthyridines.
AID1763423Cytotoxicity against human HL-60 cells by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 43Chemical modifications of ergostane-type triterpenoids from Antrodia camphorata and their cytotoxic activities.
AID1763424Cytotoxicity against human U-251 cells by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 43Chemical modifications of ergostane-type triterpenoids from Antrodia camphorata and their cytotoxic activities.
AID1447297Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 27, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and evaluation of 4-substituted anthra[2,1-c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-dione derivatives as novel non-camptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors.
AID1741730Cytotoxicity against human HT-29 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by SRB assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 204Design, synthesis and high antitumor potential of new unsymmetrical bisacridine derivatives towards human solid tumors, specifically pancreatic cancers and their unique ability to stabilize DNA G-quadruplexes.
AID1562043In vivo inhibition of HSP90 in mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as decrease in AKT protein expression at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post last dose by Western blot analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1689314Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as viable cells at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by AnnexinV-FITC and propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry analysis (Rvb = 96.03%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1433705Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human BGC823 cells assessed as body volume at 50 mg/kg, ip administered once in a week for two weeks starting from 6 days post tumor transplantation and measured every 3 days during compound dosing for 15 day2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel substituted uracil-1'(N)-acetic acid ester derivatives of 20(S)-camptothecins.
AID1689315Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as early apoptotic cells at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by AnnexinV-FITC and propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry analysis (Rvb = 1.93%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID729768Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 60 mg/kg, iv tid administered 2 days measured on day 202013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 56, Issue:4
Novel antitumor indolizino[6,7-b]indoles with multiple modes of action: DNA cross-linking and topoisomerase I and II inhibition.
AID1562056Toxicity in heart of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as cell lysis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1918855Toxicity in Balb/c mouse xenografted with human HCT-116 cells assessed as body weight change at 10 mg/kg,ip administrated for 18 days by 3 times per week
AID1856107Cytotoxicity against patient-derived human mononuclear cells assessed as cell growth inhibition incubated for 72 hrs by FMCA assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Acriflavine, an Acridine Derivative for Biomedical Application: Current State of the Art.
AID586389Ratio of IC50 for mouse bone marrow cell to IC50 for human bone marrow cell2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1903676Additive cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells measured after 6 days in presence of 5 uM KU55933 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1854858Resistance index, ratio of IC50 for antiproliferative activity against etoposide/cisplatin combination-resistant human NCI-H446 cells to IC50 for antiproliferative activity against human NCI-H446 cells2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 241Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 7-substituted 10,11-methylenedioxy-camptothecin derivatives against drug-resistant small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1194792Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor volume at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 10 (Rvb = 386 +/- 77 mm3)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID1562064Toxicity in lung of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as tissue necrosis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1447298Antiproliferative activity against human HCT116 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 05-01, Volume: 27, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and evaluation of 4-substituted anthra[2,1-c][1,2,5]thiadiazole-6,11-dione derivatives as novel non-camptothecin topoisomerase I inhibitors.
AID1763425Cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 43Chemical modifications of ergostane-type triterpenoids from Antrodia camphorata and their cytotoxic activities.
AID1221975Transporter substrate index ratio of permeability from apical to basolateral side in human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of BCRP inhibitor Ko1432011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1562062Toxicity in liver of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear shrinkage at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1856106Anticancer activity against patient-derived human CLL tumor cells assessed as tumor growth inhibition incubated for 72 hrs by FMCA assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Acriflavine, an Acridine Derivative for Biomedical Application: Current State of the Art.
AID1561986Drug uptake in human A549 cells assessed as blue shift in absorption spectrum at 5 uM by UV-visible absorption spectral analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1903731Additive cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells assessed as combination index measured in presence of 5 uM KU55933 after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1194778Toxicity in human HT-29 cells xenografted mouse assessed as body weight change at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment (Rvb = 12.7%)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID1562059Toxicity in liver of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as tissue necrosis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID586338Cytotoxicity against human A375 cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1854856Resistance index, ratio of IC50 for antiproliferative activity against Irinotecan-resistant human NCI-H446 cells to IC50 for antiproliferative activity against human NCI-H446 cells2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 241Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 7-substituted 10,11-methylenedioxy-camptothecin derivatives against drug-resistant small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo.
AID1562055Toxicity in heart of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as abnormality at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1653194Antiproliferative activity against human HL60 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 165Quinolone hybrids and their anti-cancer activities: An overview.
AID1484045Antiproliferative activity against human HepG2 cells at 10 uM after 24 hrs by MTS assay relative to control2017Journal of natural products, 02-24, Volume: 80, Issue:2
Glycybridins A-K, Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from Glycyrrhiza glabra.
AID1177875Antitumor activity against human H3347 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days measured on day 16 relative to control2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID115745Inhibition rate of tumor growth at 100 mg/kg single iv administration against Meth A fibrosarcoma cells in BALB/c Mice2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1903725Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells assessed as combination index measured in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1693072Anticancer activity against human HCT-116 cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID586340Cytotoxicity against human DU145 cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1464539Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Design, semisynthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 10-fluorocamptothecin derivatives.
AID1177888Toxicity in nude mouse xenografted with human HCT116 cells assessed as body weight loss at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days measured on day 13 relative to control2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1689297Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as increase in caspase-9 level at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID634883Growth inhibition of human HepG2 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 19, Issue:24
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-aryl-11-iminoindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID110085Antitumor activity evaluated as tumor weight on day 21 of Meth A Fibrosarcoma in BALB/c mice at a dose of 50 mg/kg administered intravenously on day 52004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID690727Half life in rat plasma at 5 uM after 24 hrs by HPLC analysis2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 22, Issue:20
Camptothecins in tumor homing via an RGD sequence mimetic.
AID1561993Antiproliferative activity against human MIAPaCa2 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by SRB assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1903727Additive cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells measured in presence of 5 uM KU55933 after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1768874Anticancer activity against human HepG2 cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 46Design, synthesis, and antitumor activity evaluation of steroidal oximes.
AID1194775Toxicity in human HT-29 cells xenografted mouse assessed as lethal toxicity at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID1562106Drug uptake in plasma of mouse xenografted with human HCT116 cells assessed as increase in drug level with shorter half life at 15 mg/kg, iv administered as single dose and measured after 30 mins to 72 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1903737Antitumor activity against human SW480 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as reduction in tumor volume at 20 mg/kg, ip in presence of 30 mg/kg, iv 2(((2-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID307320Growth inhibition of adriamycin-resistant MCF7 cells after 4 days2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 15, Issue:12
Synthesis and topoisomerase poisoning activity of A-ring and E-ring substituted luotonin A derivatives.
AID1903660Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 3 days in presence of 5 uM KU60019 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1177876Antitumor activity against human H3347 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days measured on day 31 relative to control2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1361518Antitumor activity against human HepG2 cells xenografted in BALB/C nude mouse assessed as tumor growth at 40 mg/kg, ip treated twice per week for 25 days relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-05, Volume: 156Novel indolo-sophoridinic scaffold as Topo I inhibitors: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation as anticancer agents.
AID1273546Antiproliferative activity against human RKO cells after 24 to 72 hrs by SRB assay2015Journal of natural products, Dec-24, Volume: 78, Issue:12
Antitumor Activity of Americanin A Isolated from the Seeds of Phytolacca americana by Regulating the ATM/ATR Signaling Pathway and the Skp2-p27 Axis in Human Colon Cancer Cells.
AID678799TP_TRANSPORTER: increase of cytotoxicity by GF120918 in T8 cells2001Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, Apr, Volume: 7, Issue:4
Circumvention of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)-mediated resistance to camptothecins in vitro using non-substrate drugs or the BCRP inhibitor GF120918.
AID1562058Toxicity in heart of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear fragmentation at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1401531Antiproliferative activity against human Capan1 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID702842Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells incubated for 72 hrs by MTT assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-13, Volume: 55, Issue:17
New tricks for an old natural product: discovery of highly potent evodiamine derivatives as novel antitumor agents by systemic structure-activity relationship analysis and biological evaluations.
AID721754Inhibition of human MATE1-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells after 1.5 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID1903682Cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells assessed as combination index measured after 9 days in presence of 5 uM 2(((24(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1177904Antitumor activity against human H3347 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as survival at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID586336Cytotoxicity against human HT-29 cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID699540Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1562070Toxicity in spleen of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as abnormality at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1903718Additive cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells measured in presence of 5 uM KU60019 after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID133755Maximally tolerated dose in mice bearing L1210 leukemia.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Synthesis of water-soluble (aminoalkyl)camptothecin analogues: inhibition of topoisomerase I and antitumor activity.
AID1781523Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1417 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1301465Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 24 hrs by MTS assay2016Journal of natural products, Feb-26, Volume: 79, Issue:2
Bioactive Constituents of Glycyrrhiza uralensis (Licorice): Discovery of the Effective Components of a Traditional Herbal Medicine.
AID1177861Cytotoxicity against human CCRF-CEM cells assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by Alamar Blue assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID709588Induction of apoptosis in human HT-29 assessed as accumulation at subG1 phase at 1.18 uM incubated for 7 days by flow cytometry (Rvb = 3.4 +/- 0.9%)2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Novel 3-Azaindolyl-4-arylmaleimides exhibiting potent antiangiogenic efficacy, protein kinase inhibition, and antiproliferative activity.
AID48315Specific activity (hydrolysis) by purified carboxylesterase isozyme HU1 against microsomes in human liver1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a new class of camptothecin derivatives, the long-chain fatty acid esters of 10-hydroxycamptothecin, as a potent prodrug candidate, and their in vitro metabolic conversion by carboxylesterases.
AID1903728Synergistic cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells measured in presence of 5 uM KU60019 after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID244706Percent body weight change in mouse with tumor sarcoma-180 after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection at a dose of 40 mg/Kg2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 15, Issue:13
Synthesis and antitumor activity of the hexacyclic camptothecin derivatives.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1689317Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as necrotic cells at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by AnnexinV-FITC and propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry analysis (Rvb = 1.14%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1361517Toxicity against BALB/C nude mouse xenografted with human HepG2 cells assessed as body weight loss at 40 mg/kg, ip treated twice per week measured at day 19 post dose2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-05, Volume: 156Novel indolo-sophoridinic scaffold as Topo I inhibitors: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation as anticancer agents.
AID1401545Antiproliferative activity against human KM-H2 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID481182Cytotoxicity against human LoVo cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Phosphate ester derivatives of homocamptothecin: synthesis, solution stabilities and antitumor activities.
AID1562060Toxicity in liver of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as abnormality at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1689307Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as body weight loss at 10 mg/kg, iv once a week for 3 weeks relative to irinotecan2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1693089Induction apoptosis in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in necrotic cells apoptotic cells at 6 uM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin VFITC /PI staining with flow cytometry (Rvb = 0.24%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID1462687Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 27, Issue:17
Design, synthesis, and cytotoxic activity of novel 7-substituted camptothecin derivatives incorporating piperazinyl-sulfonylamidine moieties.
AID321331Antitumor activity against human LOVO cells after 4 hrs by MTT assay2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
New homocamptothecins: synthesis, antitumor activity, and molecular modeling.
AID1401549Antiproliferative activity against human JeKo1 cells at 10 uM after 72 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID537381Cytotoxicity against human LoVo cells after 3 days by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-11, Volume: 53, Issue:21
Selection of evodiamine as a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor by structure-based virtual screening and hit optimization of evodiamine derivatives as antitumor agents.
AID1693085Induction apoptosis in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in necrotic cells apoptotic cells at 12 uM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin VFITC /PI staining with flow cytometry (Rvb = 0.24%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID1079933Acute liver toxicity defined via clinical observations and clear clinical-chemistry results: serum ALT or AST activity > 6 N or serum alkaline phosphatases activity > 1.7 N. This category includes cytolytic, choleostatic and mixed liver toxicity. Value is
AID698804Antitumor activity against human HCT116 cells xenografted in athymic nude rat at 100 mg/kg, iv administered once per week for 3 weeks2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-12, Volume: 55, Issue:7
Discovery of highly potent and selective pan-Aurora kinase inhibitors with enhanced in vivo antitumor therapeutic index.
AID1401538Antiproliferative activity against human A2780/DX cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1194791Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor volume at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 7 (Rvb = 229 +/- 57 mm3)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID453828Antiproliferative activity against human H1299 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 17, Issue:21
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-arylindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID586345Cytotoxicity against human MESSA cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1221962Efflux ratio of permeability from apical to basolateral side over basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1182584Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel 20(s)-sulfonylamidine derivatives of camptothecin as potent antitumor agents.
AID1693078Inhibition of colony formation in human SW-620 cells assessed as effect on tumor sphere formation at 30 nM by crystal violet staining based microscopic analysis2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID1903685Synergistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells assessed as combination index measured after 9 days in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1562069Toxicity in spleen of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as tissue necrosis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1903738Antitumor activity against human SW480 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as reduction in tumor weight at 20 mg/kg, ip2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1292026Cytotoxicity against human KB cells after 72 hrs by sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-10, Volume: 115Design, synthesis, cytotoxic activity and molecular docking studies of new 20(S)-sulfonylamidine camptothecin derivatives.
AID1562073Toxicity in spleen of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear fragmentation at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1689285Cytotoxicity against human MG-63 cells assessed as reduction in cell growth by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1903733Synergistic cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells assessed as combination index measured in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1177898Toxicity in nude mouse xenografted with human H3347 cells assessed as change in body weight at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days measured on day 31 relative to control2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1561991Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by SRB assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1562004Downregulation of TOP1 expression in human A549 cells after 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1221961Apparent permeability from basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1856105Anticancer activity against patient-derived human Ovarian tumor cells assessed as tumor growth inhibition incubated for 72 hrs by FMCA assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Acriflavine, an Acridine Derivative for Biomedical Application: Current State of the Art.
AID1433657Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human BGC823 cells assessed as body weight at 50 mg/kg, ip administered once in a week for two weeks starting from 6 days post tumor transplantation and measured every 3 days during compound dosing for 15 day2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel substituted uracil-1'(N)-acetic acid ester derivatives of 20(S)-camptothecins.
AID1562057Toxicity in heart of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear shrinkage at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1286291Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells assessed as cellular DNA content after 72 hrs by CyQUANT NF fluorescence assay2016Journal of natural products, Jan-22, Volume: 79, Issue:1
Amorfrutin C Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Proliferation in Colon Cancer Cells through Targeting Mitochondria.
AID1703337Toxicity in iv dosed ICR mouse measured for 14 days2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 202Oligosaccharide-camptothecin conjugates as potential antineoplastic drugs: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation.
AID409906Cytotoxicity against human KB3-1 cells by MTT method2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 16, Issue:18
11-Substituted 2,3-dimethoxy-8,9-methylenedioxybenzo[i]phenanthridine derivatives as novel topoisomerase I-targeting agents.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID630739Antitumor activity against human HCT116 cells xenografted in SCID mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 5 mg/kg, ip once every 4 days measured twice weekly relative to control2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 19, Issue:21
1,1-Diarylalkenes as anticancer agents: dual inhibitors of tubulin polymerization and phosphodiesterase 4.
AID1689330Induction of mitochondrial membrane potential loss in human SK-OV-3 cells at 5 uM measured after 24 hrs by JC-1 staining based flow cytometry analysis (Rvb = 97.87%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1433707Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human BGC823 cells assessed as mouse survival at 50 mg/kg, ip administered once in a week for two weeks starting from 6 days post tumor transplantation2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel substituted uracil-1'(N)-acetic acid ester derivatives of 20(S)-camptothecins.
AID1401551Antiproliferative activity against human L428 cells at 10 uM after 72 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1688178Antiproliferative activity against human T47D cells assessed as reduction in cell viability at 1 to 5 uM after 72 hrs by MTS assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 188Minor chemical modifications of the aminosteroid derivative RM-581 lead to major impact on its anticancer activity, metabolic stability and aqueous solubility.
AID1221956Apparent permeability from apical to basolateral side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID56562Cytotoxicity against DNA topoisomerase I purified from calf thymus1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Synthesis of water-soluble (aminoalkyl)camptothecin analogues: inhibition of topoisomerase I and antitumor activity.
AID586339Cytotoxicity against human MALME-3M cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1079947Comments (NB not yet translated). [column 'COMMENTAIRES' in source]
AID480015Toxicity in NCR nu/nu mouse xenografted with human MDA-MB-435 cells assessed as average body weight at 20 mg/kg, ip administered 3 times a week for 4 weeks measured on day 35 (RVb = 24.6 +/- 1.3 g)2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-13, Volume: 53, Issue:9
Macrocyclic pyridyl polyoxazoles: selective RNA and DNA G-quadruplex ligands as antitumor agents.
AID1401532Antiproliferative activity against human A431 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1903715Additive cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells measured in presence of 5 uM KU55933 after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1903684Synergistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells assessed as combination index measured after 9 days in presence of 5 uM KU60019 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1286293Antiproliferative activity against human T84 cells assessed as cellular DNA content after 96 hrs by CyQUANT NF fluorescence assay2016Journal of natural products, Jan-22, Volume: 79, Issue:1
Amorfrutin C Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Proliferation in Colon Cancer Cells through Targeting Mitochondria.
AID1562053Toxicity in kidney of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear fragmentation at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1689340Cytotoxicity against human U2OS cells assessed as reduction in cell growth by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1286295Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells assessed as cellular DNA content after 72 hrs by CyQUANT NF fluorescence assay2016Journal of natural products, Jan-22, Volume: 79, Issue:1
Amorfrutin C Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Proliferation in Colon Cancer Cells through Targeting Mitochondria.
AID721751Inhibition of human OCT2-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells after 3 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID1768872Anticancer activity against human WiDr cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 46Design, synthesis, and antitumor activity evaluation of steroidal oximes.
AID1856104Anticancer activity against patient-derived human Colorectal tumor cells assessed as tumor growth inhibition incubated for 72 hrs by FMCA assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-08, Volume: 65, Issue:17
Acriflavine, an Acridine Derivative for Biomedical Application: Current State of the Art.
AID453826Antiproliferative activity against human HepG2(2.2.1) cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 17, Issue:21
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-arylindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID1703330Cytotoxicity against human HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 202Oligosaccharide-camptothecin conjugates as potential antineoplastic drugs: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation.
AID1079944Benign tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.BEN' in source]
AID1079943Malignant tumor, proven histopathologically. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'T.MAL' in source]
AID1781528Cytotoxicity against human HCT-116 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID586341Cytotoxicity against human LNCAP cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1197742Stimulation of human OATP1B1-mediated [3H]estrone 3-sulfate at 100 uM after 5 mins relative to control2015European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-06, Volume: 92Interaction of human organic anion transporter polypeptides 1B1 and 1B3 with antineoplastic compounds.
AID1177867Cytotoxicity against human H1299 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by Alamar Blue assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1702781Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 187Design, synthesis and antineoplastic activity of novel 20(S)-acylthiourea derivatives of camptothecin.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1781526Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H82 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1443372Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 hrs by sulforhodamine B assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 7-(N-[(substituted-sulfonyl)piperazinyl]-methyl)-camptothecin derivatives.
AID481183Antitumor activity against human A549 cells xenografted in BALB/c mouse assessed as inhibition of tumor growth at 50 mg/kg, ip relative to control2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 18, Issue:9
Phosphate ester derivatives of homocamptothecin: synthesis, solution stabilities and antitumor activities.
AID100463Inhibitory activity in mice bearing L1210 leukemia1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Synthesis of water-soluble (aminoalkyl)camptothecin analogues: inhibition of topoisomerase I and antitumor activity.
AID1689299Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as increase in Bcl-2 level at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by Western blot analysis relative to control2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID586347Cytotoxicity against human H69 cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID699541Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1401588Antitumor activity against human MM473 cells xenografted in CD1 nude mouse assessed as inhibition of tumor volume at 20 mg/kg, iv administered every 4 days per week for 3 weeks measured 10 days post last dose by luciferase reporter assay relative to vehic2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1292025Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-10, Volume: 115Design, synthesis, cytotoxic activity and molecular docking studies of new 20(S)-sulfonylamidine camptothecin derivatives.
AID1221957Apparent permeability from basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID409908Cytotoxicity against human KBH5.0 cells by MTT method2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 16, Issue:18
11-Substituted 2,3-dimethoxy-8,9-methylenedioxybenzo[i]phenanthridine derivatives as novel topoisomerase I-targeting agents.
AID1768871Anticancer activity against human PC-3 cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 46Design, synthesis, and antitumor activity evaluation of steroidal oximes.
AID253448Lethal toxicity in mouse with tumor sarcoma-180 after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection at a dose of 40 mg/Kg of total 8 tested2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 15, Issue:13
Synthesis and antitumor activity of the hexacyclic camptothecin derivatives.
AID1443375Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells after 72 hrs by sulforhodamine B assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 7-(N-[(substituted-sulfonyl)piperazinyl]-methyl)-camptothecin derivatives.
AID1903690Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells in presence of 10 uM 3-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-((4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)carbamothioyl)benzamide measured after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1883365Antiproliferative activity against human HCT-116 cells harboring beta-catenin mutant assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by SRB assay
AID1194793Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor volume at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 14 (Rvb = 677 +/- 115 mm3)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID1903659Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 3 days in presence of 5 uM KU55933 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID362322Antitumor activity against human MDA-MB-231 cells xenografted in athymic nude mouse assessed as tumor volume on day 7 at initial dose of 20 mg/kg, ip qd X 5/week (450 mg/kg last dose)2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Syntheses and biological evaluation of topoisomerase I-targeting agents related to 11-[2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl]-2,3-dimethoxy-8,9-methylenedioxy-11H-isoquino[4,3-c]cinnolin-12-one (ARC-31).
AID120408Ratio between mean survival days of treated group and control group at a dose of 100 mg/kg2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1903672Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index measured after 6 days in presence of 5 uM 2(((24(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1239182Cytotoxicity against human HCT116 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-27, Volume: 58, Issue:16
Scaffold Diversity Inspired by the Natural Product Evodiamine: Discovery of Highly Potent and Multitargeting Antitumor Agents.
AID1079935Cytolytic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is > 5 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CYTOL' in source]
AID634880Growth inhibition of human MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 19, Issue:24
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-aryl-11-iminoindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID721749Inhibition of human OCT3-mediated ASP+ uptake expressed in HEK293 cells after 3 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID1903656Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index measured after 2 days in presence of 5 uM KU60019 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID539593Growth inhibition of human NCI60 cells by SBR assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-01, Volume: 20, Issue:23
Discovery and selectivity-profiling of 4-benzylamino 1-aza-9-oxafluorene derivatives as lead structures for IGF-1R inhibitors.
AID1182585Cytotoxicity against human DU145 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel 20(s)-sulfonylamidine derivatives of camptothecin as potent antitumor agents.
AID1903671Synergistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells measured after 6 days in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID442468Antitumor activity against human SJSA1 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 100 mg/kg, ip dosed once weekly for two weeks relative to untreated control2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 52, Issue:24
Potent and orally active small-molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction.
AID1462689Cytotoxicity against human KB cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 27, Issue:17
Design, synthesis, and cytotoxic activity of novel 7-substituted camptothecin derivatives incorporating piperazinyl-sulfonylamidine moieties.
AID121410Evaluated for survival time of P388 Leukemia implanted female CDF1 Mice at a dose of 25 mg/kg2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1079946Presence of at least one case with successful reintroduction. [column 'REINT' in source]
AID1177889Toxicity in nude mouse xenografted with human H3347 cells assessed as body weight loss at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1562054Toxicity in heart of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as tissue necrosis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1903732Synergistic cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells assessed as combination index measured in presence of 5 uM KU60019 after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1177883Antitumor activity against human HCT116 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days measured on day 31 relative to control2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID540217Volume of distribution at steady state in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1781522Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1650 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1689312Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as organ related toxicity on spleen morphology at 10 mg/kg, iv once a week for 3 weeks by H and E staining-based fluorescence microscopy2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID721742Ratio of Cmax unbound to IC50 for human MATE1-mediated [14]-metformin uptake expressed in polarized MDCK2 cells2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-14, Volume: 56, Issue:3
Discovery of potent, selective multidrug and toxin extrusion transporter 1 (MATE1, SLC47A1) inhibitors through prescription drug profiling and computational modeling.
AID121411Evaluated for survival time of P388 Leukemia implanted female CDF1 Mice at a dose of 50 mg/kg2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID453825Antiproliferative activity against human Hep3B cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 17, Issue:21
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-arylindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID1781520Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H2170 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1561992Antiproliferative activity against human HCT116 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by SRB assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1854849Antitumor activity against human NCI-H446 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 3 mg/kg, IG administered once a week for 28 days by electronic caliper method relative to control2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 241Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 7-substituted 10,11-methylenedioxy-camptothecin derivatives against drug-resistant small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo.
AID1443374Cytotoxicity against human KBVIN cells after 72 hrs by sulforhodamine B assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 7-(N-[(substituted-sulfonyl)piperazinyl]-methyl)-camptothecin derivatives.
AID729762Toxicity in nude mouse xenografted with human HT-29 cells assessed as body weight loss at 60 mg/kg, iv tid administered 2 days measured for 20 days2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 56, Issue:4
Novel antitumor indolizino[6,7-b]indoles with multiple modes of action: DNA cross-linking and topoisomerase I and II inhibition.
AID1401544Antiproliferative activity against human L428 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1292027Cytotoxicity against human KBVIN cells after 72 hrs by sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-10, Volume: 115Design, synthesis, cytotoxic activity and molecular docking studies of new 20(S)-sulfonylamidine camptothecin derivatives.
AID1431494Antitumor activity against human NCI-H526 cells xenografted in athymic nude mouse at 30 mg/kg, iv qd administered 5 times for every 2 days2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 127Novel indolizino[8,7-b]indole hybrids as anti-small cell lung cancer agents: Regioselective modulation of topoisomerase II inhibitory and DNA crosslinking activities.
AID1292191Toxicity in BALB/c mouse assessed as reduction in body weight at 12.5 mg/kg, ip twice weekly for 4 weeks measured 24 hrs post last dose2016European journal of medicinal chemistry, May-23, Volume: 114Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel benzimidazole-2-substituted phenyl or pyridine propyl ketene derivatives as antitumour agents.
AID1079936Choleostatic liver toxicity, either proven histopathologically or where the ratio of maximal ALT or AST activity above normal to that of Alkaline Phosphatase is < 2 (see ACUTE). Value is number of references indexed. [column 'CHOLE' in source]
AID110797Number of mice(with Colon 38 tumors) cured after treatment of 65 mg/kg/day dose given as 3 times in a day for 4 days out of 5 mice2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-13, Volume: 46, Issue:6
Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of carboxamide derivatives of benzo[b][1,6]naphthyridines.
AID404304Effect on human MRP2-mediated estradiol-17-beta-glucuronide transport in Sf9 cells inverted membrane vesicles relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-12, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Prediction and identification of drug interactions with the human ATP-binding cassette transporter multidrug-resistance associated protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2).
AID1854855Antiproliferative activity against Irinotecan-resistant human NCI-H446 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth incubated for 72 hrs by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 241Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 7-substituted 10,11-methylenedioxy-camptothecin derivatives against drug-resistant small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo.
AID1401548Antiproliferative activity against human Mino cells at 10 uM after 72 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1653192Antiproliferative activity against human HeLa cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 165Quinolone hybrids and their anti-cancer activities: An overview.
AID586344Ratio IC50 for human H460 cells after 72 hrs in presence of 40 mg/ml HSA to IC50 for human H460 cells after 72 hrs2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1462690Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 27, Issue:17
Design, synthesis, and cytotoxic activity of novel 7-substituted camptothecin derivatives incorporating piperazinyl-sulfonylamidine moieties.
AID1433660Antitumor activity against human BGC823 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 50 mg/kg, ip administered once in a week for two weeks starting from 6 days post tumor transplantation measured 27 to 30 days post tumor 2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Synthesis and antitumor activity of novel substituted uracil-1'(N)-acetic acid ester derivatives of 20(S)-camptothecins.
AID1177261Antitumor activity against human NCI-H1299 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 10 mg/kg, po qd from day 28 to 41 after tumor inoculation2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-08, Volume: 6, Issue:1
Pyrimidine-based tricyclic molecules as potent and orally efficacious inhibitors of wee1 kinase.
AID121413Evaluated for survival time of P388/ADM Leukemia implanted female CDF1 Mice at a dose of 100 mg/kg2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID407780Inhibition of human AChE2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-12, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Exploiting protein fluctuations at the active-site gorge of human cholinesterases: further optimization of the design strategy to develop extremely potent inhibitors.
AID103243Compound was tested in vitro for cytotoxicity against MCF-7ADR, human breast cancer cells (taxol-resistant) at a drug concentration producing 50% inhibition of colony formation2002Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-06, Volume: 12, Issue:9
Novel camptothecin derivatives. Part 1: oxyalkanoic acid esters of camptothecin and their in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity.
AID1401543Antiproliferative activity against human OCI-LY3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID586349Resistance ratio of of IC50 for human MES-SA/Dx5 cells overexpressing MDR1 after 72 hrs to IC50 for human MESSA cells after 72 hrs2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID729767Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 60 mg/kg, iv tid administered 2 days measured on day 222013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 56, Issue:4
Novel antitumor indolizino[6,7-b]indoles with multiple modes of action: DNA cross-linking and topoisomerase I and II inhibition.
AID539594Cytotoxicity against human NCI60 cells by SBR assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-01, Volume: 20, Issue:23
Discovery and selectivity-profiling of 4-benzylamino 1-aza-9-oxafluorene derivatives as lead structures for IGF-1R inhibitors.
AID121420Survival time of CDF1 mice inoculated with leukemia P388 cells determined after 40 days of intravenous administration of compound at 20 mg/kg on days 1, 5 and 92004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-05, Volume: 14, Issue:7
Efficient and chemoselective N-acylation of 10-amino-7-ethyl camptothecin with poly(ethylene glycol).
AID110083Antitumor activity evaluated as tumor weight on day 21 of Meth A Fibrosarcoma in BALB/c mice at a dose of 100 mg/kg administered intravenously on day 52004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1689293Antimigratory activity against human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as reduction in wound closure at 10 uM after 24 hrs by wound healing assay (Rvb = 56.9%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1221976Transporter substrate index ratio of permeability from basolateral to apical side in human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of BCRP inhibitor Ko1432011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1903683Additive cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells assessed as combination index measured after 9 days in presence of 5 uM KU55933 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1562072Toxicity in spleen of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear shrinkage at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1401541Antiproliferative activity against human JeKo1 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1781517Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID634879Growth inhibition of human MCF7 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 19, Issue:24
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-aryl-11-iminoindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID1530420Growth inhibition of human HT-29 cells at 5 ug/ml by MTT assay relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 161Research advances on anticancer activities of matrine and its derivatives: An updated overview.
AID1562061Toxicity in liver of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as cell lysis at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1562063Toxicity in liver of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear fragmentation at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID110096Inhibition rate of tumor growth at 25 mg/kg single iv administration against Meth A fibrosarcoma cells in BALB/c Mice2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1781518Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H520 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1286292Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells assessed as cellular DNA content after 72 hrs by CyQUANT NF fluorescence assay relative to control2016Journal of natural products, Jan-22, Volume: 79, Issue:1
Amorfrutin C Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Proliferation in Colon Cancer Cells through Targeting Mitochondria.
AID1693086Induction apoptosis in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in late apoptotic cells at 12 uM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin VFITC /PI staining with flow cytometry (Rvb = 3.18%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID1754555Cytotoxicity against human CCD-841CoN cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth measured after 72 hrs2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 46New camptothecin derivatives for generalized oncological chemotherapy: Synthesis, stereochemistry and biology.
AID540215Volume of distribution at steady state in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1182586Cytotoxicity against human KB cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel 20(s)-sulfonylamidine derivatives of camptothecin as potent antitumor agents.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1443373Cytotoxicity against human KB cells after 72 hrs by sulforhodamine B assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 04-15, Volume: 27, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 7-(N-[(substituted-sulfonyl)piperazinyl]-methyl)-camptothecin derivatives.
AID1079941Liver damage due to vascular disease: peliosis hepatitis, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, Budd-Chiari syndrome. Value is number of references indexed. [column 'VASC' in source]
AID1703329Antitumor activity against human SW1990 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 202Oligosaccharide-camptothecin conjugates as potential antineoplastic drugs: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation.
AID1693100Induction of cell cycle arrest in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in number of cells at G2/M phase at 6 uM measured after 72 hrs by PI staining using flow cytometry (Rvb = 27.08%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID131159Effect in increasing life span of mice bearing L1210 leukemia1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 34, Issue:1
Synthesis of water-soluble (aminoalkyl)camptothecin analogues: inhibition of topoisomerase I and antitumor activity.
AID1530418Growth inhibition of human HT-29 cells at 1.25 ug/ml by MTT assay relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 161Research advances on anticancer activities of matrine and its derivatives: An updated overview.
AID1562052Toxicity in kidney of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear shrinkage at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1903658Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 3 days in presence of 5 uM 2(((24(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1903675Synergistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index measured after 6 days in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID399531Anticancer activity against human with metastatic pancreatic cancer assessed as median survival2004Journal of natural products, Feb, Volume: 67, Issue:2
Camptothecin and taxol: historic achievements in natural products research.
AID589114Mechanism based inhibition of human cytochrome P450 3A42005Current drug metabolism, Oct, Volume: 6, Issue:5
Cytochrome p450 enzymes mechanism based inhibitors: common sub-structures and reactivity.
AID586390Ratio of IC90 for mouse bone marrow cell to IC90 for human bone marrow cell2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1221965Transporter substrate index of efflux ratio in human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of P-gp inhibitor LY3359792011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1781521Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1975 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1883368Antiproliferative activity against human CCD-18Co cells assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by SRB assay
AID1903650Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells measured after 2 days in presence of 5 uM 2(((24(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1519253Antiproliferative activity against human HT-29 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 185Multigram scale synthesis of polycyclic lactones and evaluation of antitumor and other biological properties.
AID115747Inhibition rate of tumor growth at 50 mg/kg single iv administration against Meth A fibrosarcoma cells in BALB/c Mice2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary in vivo tests of new poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of the antitumor agent 10-amino-7-ethylcamptothecin.
AID1182587Cytotoxicity against human KBVIN cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel 20(s)-sulfonylamidine derivatives of camptothecin as potent antitumor agents.
AID1177870Cytotoxicity against human H3347 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by Alamar Blue assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID681563TP_TRANSPORTER: Cytotoxicity in MT-4 and MT-4/DOX500 cells2003Molecular pharmacology, Jan, Volume: 63, Issue:1
Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) induces cellular resistance to HIV-1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
AID243422log (1/Km) value for human liver microsome cytochrome P450 3A42005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 15, Issue:18
Modeling K(m) values using electrotopological state: substrates for cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated metabolism.
AID1763426Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 43Chemical modifications of ergostane-type triterpenoids from Antrodia camphorata and their cytotoxic activities.
AID1903679Additive cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 9 days in presence of 5 uM KU55933 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID679165TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Estrone-3-sulfate uptake(Estrone-3-sulfate: 9.2nM) in Xenopus laevis oocytes2005Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 33, Issue:3
Role of organic anion transporter OATP1B1 (OATP-C) in hepatic uptake of irinotecan and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin: in vitro evidence and effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms.
AID1854774Antiproliferative activity against human NCI-H446 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth incubated for 72 hrs by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 241Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 7-substituted 10,11-methylenedioxy-camptothecin derivatives against drug-resistant small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo.
AID1561988Drug uptake in human A549 cells assessed as blue fluorescence at 5 uM after 12 hrs by confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID453827Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-01, Volume: 17, Issue:21
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-arylindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID1689322Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as live and dead cells at 5 uM measured after 24 hrs by calcein AM/PI double staining-based fluorescence microscopy2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1741732Cytotoxicity against human HCT-116 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by SRB assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-15, Volume: 204Design, synthesis and high antitumor potential of new unsymmetrical bisacridine derivatives towards human solid tumors, specifically pancreatic cancers and their unique ability to stabilize DNA G-quadruplexes.
AID1703328Antitumor activity against human HCT-116 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 202Oligosaccharide-camptothecin conjugates as potential antineoplastic drugs: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation.
AID362325Antitumor activity against human MDA-MB-231 cells xenografted in athymic nude mouse assessed as tumor volume on day 31 at initial dose of 20 mg/kg, ip qd X 5/week (450 mg/kg total dose)2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-15, Volume: 16, Issue:16
Syntheses and biological evaluation of topoisomerase I-targeting agents related to 11-[2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl]-2,3-dimethoxy-8,9-methylenedioxy-11H-isoquino[4,3-c]cinnolin-12-one (ARC-31).
AID1781516Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H460 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1781524Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H211 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1464542Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Design, semisynthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 10-fluorocamptothecin derivatives.
AID1917037Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 241Recent advances in combretastatin A-4 codrugs for cancer therapy.
AID1689295Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as increase in reactive oxygen species production at 10 uM measured after 24 hrs incubation by DCFH-DA staining based flow cytometric analysis (Rvb = 2.63%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1428727Half life in human2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-15, Volume: 27, Issue:4
The long story of camptothecin: From traditional medicine to drugs.
AID1286290Antiproliferative activity against human MCF7 cells assessed as cellular DNA content after 96 hrs by CyQUANT NF fluorescence assay2016Journal of natural products, Jan-22, Volume: 79, Issue:1
Amorfrutin C Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Proliferation in Colon Cancer Cells through Targeting Mitochondria.
AID81704Compound was tested in vitro for cytotoxicity against HCT116, human colon cancer cells (taxol-resistant) at a drug concentration producing 50% inhibition of colony formation2002Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-06, Volume: 12, Issue:9
Novel camptothecin derivatives. Part 1: oxyalkanoic acid esters of camptothecin and their in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity.
AID1768873Anticancer activity against human H1299 cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 46Design, synthesis, and antitumor activity evaluation of steroidal oximes.
AID1859471Half life in Sprague-Dawley rat by scintillation radioactivity counting method2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-05, Volume: 236Topoisomerase I inhibitors: Challenges, progress and the road ahead.
AID1903655Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells assessed as combination index measured after 2 days in presence of 5 uM KU55933 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1689333Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as increase in caspase-3 level at 5 uM incubated for 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1401539Antiproliferative activity against human Mino cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1754552Cytotoxicity against human HT-29 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth measured after 72 hrs2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 46New camptothecin derivatives for generalized oncological chemotherapy: Synthesis, stereochemistry and biology.
AID1221968Apparent permeability from apical to basolateral side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis in presence of 1 uM of BCRP inhibitor Ko1432011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1689308Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as organ related toxicity on liver morphology at 10 mg/kg, iv once a week for 3 weeks by H and E staining-based fluorescence microscopy2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID120899Survival rate was determined as the ratio of mean survival days of treated group of mice to that of control group2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-05, Volume: 14, Issue:7
Efficient and chemoselective N-acylation of 10-amino-7-ethyl camptothecin with poly(ethylene glycol).
AID1401535Antiproliferative activity against human DU145 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1562048Prodrug release in tumor of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as increase in 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin level at 36 mg/kg, iv after 24 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1401530Antiproliferative activity against human NCI-H460 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1883363Antiproliferative activity against human SW480 cells harboring wild type beta-catenin assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by SRB assay
AID729765Antitumor activity against human A549 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 60 mg/kg, iv tid administered 2 days measured on day 20 relative to vehicle-treated control2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 56, Issue:4
Novel antitumor indolizino[6,7-b]indoles with multiple modes of action: DNA cross-linking and topoisomerase I and II inhibition.
AID1562079Antitumor activity against human Capan1 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as tumor cells with nuclear lysis at 50 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1702784Cytotoxicity against human KB-VIN cells assessed as growth inhibition measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-01, Volume: 187Design, synthesis and antineoplastic activity of novel 20(S)-acylthiourea derivatives of camptothecin.
AID1903724Additive cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells assessed as combination index measured in presence of 5 uM KU60019 after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1903653Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells measured after 2 days in presence of 50 nM AZD0156 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1215101Terminal elimination rate constant in cancer patient normal renal function administered as infusion after 0.25 to 1.5 hrs by RP-HPLC analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Delayed elimination of SN-38 in cancer patients with severe renal failure.
AID1177871Cytotoxicity against human DLD1 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by Alamar Blue assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1177872Antitumor activity against human HCT116 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 30 mg/kg,iv qd administered for 6 days measured on day 15 relative to control2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1401533Antiproliferative activity against human HeLa cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID48320Specific activity (hydrolysis) by purified carboxylesterase isozyme P1 against microsomes in pig liver1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-03, Volume: 8, Issue:5
Synthesis of a new class of camptothecin derivatives, the long-chain fatty acid esters of 10-hydroxycamptothecin, as a potent prodrug candidate, and their in vitro metabolic conversion by carboxylesterases.
AID679163TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in OATP1B1-expressing HEK293 cell2005Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 33, Issue:3
Role of organic anion transporter OATP1B1 (OATP-C) in hepatic uptake of irinotecan and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin: in vitro evidence and effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms.
AID46871Cytotoxic activity against human lymphoblast tumor cell line CPT-K5 after 4 days of treatment2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-22, Volume: 46, Issue:11
Nitro and amino substitution in the D-ring of 5-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)- 2,3-methylenedioxy-5H-dibenzo[c,h][1,6]naphthyridin-6-ones: effect on topoisomerase-I targeting activity and cytotoxicity.
AID1562005Downregulation of TOP1 expression in human HCT116 cells after 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1693091Induction apoptosis in human SW-620 cells assessed as increase in early apoptotic cells at 6 uM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin VFITC /PI staining with flow cytometry (Rvb = 4.08%)2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID1689324Cell cycle arrest in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as cell accumulation at G1 phase at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry analysis (Rvb = 66.77%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1854860Antitumor activity against Irinotecan-resistant human NCI-H446 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as tumor weight at 100 mg/kg, IG administered once a week and measured 3 times a week for 35 days2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-05, Volume: 241Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel 7-substituted 10,11-methylenedioxy-camptothecin derivatives against drug-resistant small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo.
AID1689316Induction of apoptosis in human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as late apoptotic cells at 10 uM incubated for 24 hrs by AnnexinV-FITC and propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry analysis (Rvb = 0.89%)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID718859Cytotoxicity against human KB cells by SRB assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 22, Issue:24
Design and one-pot synthesis of new 7-acyl camptothecin derivatives as potent cytotoxic agents.
AID540214Clearance in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID718860Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells by SRB assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 22, Issue:24
Design and one-pot synthesis of new 7-acyl camptothecin derivatives as potent cytotoxic agents.
AID1754553Cytotoxicity against human HL-60 cells assessed as inhibition of cell growth measured after 72 hrs2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 46New camptothecin derivatives for generalized oncological chemotherapy: Synthesis, stereochemistry and biology.
AID1546668Cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2020Journal of natural products, 01-24, Volume: 83, Issue:1
Antcamphorols A-K, Cytotoxic and ROS Scavenging Triterpenoids from
AID719543Antitumor activity against human HT-29 cells xenografted in athymic mouse assessed as tumor growth delay at 12.5 mg/kg, ip tid for 7 days (Rvb = 6.9 1.5)2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Discovery of 3-alkoxyamino-5-(pyridin-2-ylamino)pyrazine-2-carbonitriles as selective, orally bioavailable CHK1 inhibitors.
AID1301464Cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 24 hrs by MTS assay2016Journal of natural products, Feb-26, Volume: 79, Issue:2
Bioactive Constituents of Glycyrrhiza uralensis (Licorice): Discovery of the Effective Components of a Traditional Herbal Medicine.
AID1562108Prodrug release in tumor of mouse xenografted with human HCT116 cells assessed as increase in 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin level at 15 mg/kg, iv administered as single dose by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1781529Cytotoxicity against human PacaS1 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by PrestoBlue reagent based assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-09, Volume: 64, Issue:17
Discovery of Oral Anticancer 1,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)benzo[
AID1903726Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H1299 cells measured in presence of 5 uM 2(((2-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol after 6 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1693077Inhibition of colony formation in human SW-620 cells assessed as damaged tumor sphere at 3 to 6 uM by crystal violet staining based microscopic analysis2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-01, Volume: 29Neothalfine, a potent natural anti-tumor agent against metastatic colorectal cancer and its primary mechanism.
AID1903664Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells assessed as combination index measured after 3 days in presence of 5 uM KU60019 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID732797Induction of DNA damage in human BT-483 cells assessed as gamma H2AX phosphorylation at Ser139 at 1 uM after 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 62Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling studies of 1-aryl-6-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-3(Z)-hexen-1,5-diynes as a new class of potent antitumor agents.
AID1194809Toxicity in human HT-29 cells xenografted mouse assessed as body weight level at 15 mg/kg, iv dosed three times per week to the end of treatment measured on day 7 (Rvb = 21.7 +/- 1 g)2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, May-01, Volume: 23, Issue:9
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel homocamptothecin analogues as potent antitumor agents.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1221958Efflux ratio of permeability from apical to basolateral side over basolateral to apical side of human Caco2 cells at 10 uM up to 120 mins by HPLC-MC analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 39, Issue:2
Attenuation of intestinal absorption by major efflux transporters: quantitative tools and strategies using a Caco-2 model.
AID1182634Toxicity in ip dosed mouse2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel 20(s)-sulfonylamidine derivatives of camptothecin as potent antitumor agents.
AID781330pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by potentiometric titration2014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID1462691Cytotoxicity against human KBVIN cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 27, Issue:17
Design, synthesis, and cytotoxic activity of novel 7-substituted camptothecin derivatives incorporating piperazinyl-sulfonylamidine moieties.
AID707306Toxicity in human A549 cells expressing wild type p53 xenografted nude BALB/C mouse assessed as reduction of body weight at 0.5 mg/kg, ip qd for 5 days2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-26, Volume: 55, Issue:22
Discovery, synthesis, and biological evaluation of orally active pyrrolidone derivatives as novel inhibitors of p53-MDM2 protein-protein interaction.
AID1177865Cytotoxicity against human HT-29 cells assessed as growth inhibition after 72 hrs by Alamar Blue assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Design and synthesis of potent antitumor water-soluble phenyl N-mustard-benzenealkylamide conjugates via a bioisostere approach.
AID1401556Antiproliferative activity against human MM487 cells at 10 uM after 72 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID680746TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of E1S uptake (irinotecan 10 u M) in OATP1B1-expressing HEK293 cells2005Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Mar, Volume: 33, Issue:3
Role of organic anion transporter OATP1B1 (OATP-C) in hepatic uptake of irinotecan and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin: in vitro evidence and effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms.
AID1903678Cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells measured after 9 days in presence of 5 uM 2(((24(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1546666Cytotoxicity against human U251 cells incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2020Journal of natural products, 01-24, Volume: 83, Issue:1
Antcamphorols A-K, Cytotoxic and ROS Scavenging Triterpenoids from
AID418341Toxicity to iv dosed mouse administered as single bolus dose for 3 weeks2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-01, Volume: 19, Issue:7
Synthesis of new camptothecin analogs with improved antitumor activities.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1515368Antitumor activity against mouse Colon 26 cells implanted in BALB/c mouse at 50 mg/kg, iv administered every 2 days for 7 times starting 1 day after tumor implantation and measured daily until day 202019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 27, Issue:2
Lamellarin-inspired potent topoisomerase I inhibitors with the unprecedented benzo[g][1]benzopyrano[4,3-b]indol-6(13H)-one scaffold.
AID320891Antitumor activity against human HT29 cells xenografted nu/nu mouse assessed as Cdc2 PY15 phosphorylation level at 40 mg/kg, iv after 30 mins by Western blotting2008Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 18, Issue:3
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of soluble 8-substituted 4-(2-chlorophenyl)-9-hydroxypyrrolo[3,4-c]carbazole-1,3(2H,6H)-diones as inhibitors of the Wee1 and Chk1 checkpoint kinases.
AID1883422Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human LS174T cells assessed as effect on body weight at 10 to 30 mg/kg, ip administered 3 times per week for 21 days
AID1903686Synergistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells in presence of 10 uM 3-Chloro-4-methoxy-N-((4-(oxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-yl)phenyl)carbamothioyl)benzamide measured after 2 days by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1464541Cytotoxicity against human KBVIN cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Design, semisynthesis and potent cytotoxic activity of novel 10-fluorocamptothecin derivatives.
AID1562065Toxicity in lung of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as abnormality at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID586352Cytotoxicity against mouse bone marrow cell by CFU-GM assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1903739Antitumor activity against human SW480 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as reduction in tumor weight at 20 mg/kg, ip in presence of 30 mg/kg, iv 2(((2-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy)naphthalen-1-yl)methyl)amino)ethan-1-ol2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1399559Antiproliferative activity against human HCT116 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-01, Volume: 26, Issue:16
A series of camptothecin prodrugs exhibit HDAC inhibition activity.
AID1903651Antagonistic cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells measured after 2 days in presence of 5 uM KU55933 by SRB assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Discovery of novel ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase modulators: Computational simulation, biological evaluation and cancer combinational chemotherapy study.
AID1689287Cytotoxicity against human SK-OV-3/CDDP cells assessed as reduction in cell growth by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1401547Antiproliferative activity against human NB4 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-01, Volume: 143Camptothecin-psammaplin A hybrids as topoisomerase I and HDAC dual-action inhibitors.
AID1562035Antitumor activity against human Capan1 cells xenografted in mouse assessed as reduction in tumor volume at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days and measured twice per week by microcaliper method relative to control2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1182588Inhibition of human recombinant topoisomerase 1 at 3 uM preincubated for 20 mins before addition of supercoiled plasmid DNA by ethidium bromide dye based gel electrophoresis2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel 20(s)-sulfonylamidine derivatives of camptothecin as potent antitumor agents.
AID1653193Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 165Quinolone hybrids and their anti-cancer activities: An overview.
AID634882Growth inhibition of human H1299 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 19, Issue:24
Synthesis and antiproliferative evaluation of 6-aryl-11-iminoindeno[1,2-c]quinoline derivatives.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID586348Cytotoxicity against human H69AR cells overexpressing MDR1 after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID244685Average tumor weight in mouse with tumor sarcoma-180 after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection at a dose of 40 mg/Kg2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jul-01, Volume: 15, Issue:13
Synthesis and antitumor activity of the hexacyclic camptothecin derivatives.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1286286Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells assessed as cellular DNA content after 72 hrs by CyQUANT NF fluorescence assay relative to control2016Journal of natural products, Jan-22, Volume: 79, Issue:1
Amorfrutin C Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Proliferation in Colon Cancer Cells through Targeting Mitochondria.
AID1399552Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-01, Volume: 26, Issue:16
A series of camptothecin prodrugs exhibit HDAC inhibition activity.
AID1562067Toxicity in lung of mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as nuclear shrinkage at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post-last dose by H and E staining based analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID586343Cytotoxicity against human H460 cells after 72 hrs by alamar blue assay in presence of 40 mg/ml HSA2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-24, Volume: 54, Issue:6
14-Aminocamptothecins: their synthesis, preclinical activity, and potential use for cancer treatment.
AID1286296Antiproliferative activity against human MCF7 cells assessed as cellular DNA content after 96 hrs by CyQUANT NF fluorescence assay relative to control2016Journal of natural products, Jan-22, Volume: 79, Issue:1
Amorfrutin C Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Proliferation in Colon Cancer Cells through Targeting Mitochondria.
AID718858Cytotoxicity against human DU145 cells by SRB assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 22, Issue:24
Design and one-pot synthesis of new 7-acyl camptothecin derivatives as potent cytotoxic agents.
AID1562114Drug uptake in mouse plasma xenografted with human Capan1 cells at 36 mg/kg, iv after 30 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1724963Antitumor activity against human COLO205 cells xenografted in SCID/beige mouse assessed as tumor growth delay at 30 mg/kg/day, ip administered as 4 doses with 3 day interval2020ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-08, Volume: 11, Issue:10
Discovery of A-1331852, a First-in-Class, Potent, and Orally-Bioavailable BCL-X
AID1689311Toxicity in BALB/c nude mouse xenografted with human SK-OV-3 cells assessed as organ related toxicity on kidney morphology at 10 mg/kg, iv once a week for 3 weeks by H and E staining-based fluorescence microscopy2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 189Synthesis, mechanisms of action, and toxicity of novel aminophosphonates derivatives conjugated irinotecan in vitro and in vivo as potent antitumor agents.
AID1562110In vivo inhibition of topoisomerase 1 in mouse xenografted with human Capan1 cells assessed as increase in phosphorylated KAP1 expression at 36 mg/kg, iv for every 2 days measured at 2 hrs post last dose by Western blot analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-28, Volume: 63, Issue:10
Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of HSP90 Inhibitor-SN38 Conjugates for Targeted Drug Accumulation.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (7,671)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19907 (0.09)18.7374
1990's596 (7.77)18.2507
2000's2959 (38.57)29.6817
2010's3104 (40.46)24.3611
2020's1005 (13.10)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 83.57

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index83.57 (24.57)
Research Supply Index9.20 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.91 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index150.61 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (83.57)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials1,885 (23.56%)5.53%
Reviews1,098 (13.72%)6.00%
Case Studies740 (9.25%)4.05%
Observational53 (0.66%)0.25%
Other4,226 (52.81%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (1284)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Phase 1 Study of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan (Nal-IRI, ONIVYDE®) in Combination With TAS-102 (LONSURF®) in Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT03810742]Phase 144 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-05Completed
FOLFOX6 Versus mFOLFIRINOX as First Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma (Type II-III): Open-label Randomized Phase 2/3 Trial [NCT04442984]Phase 2326 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-03Recruiting
Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of 70-150μm Drug Eluting Beads Loaded With Irinotecan (DEBIRI) in the Treatment of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases [NCT02350400]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Watch and Wait Strategy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Multi-centre, Adaptive-design, Phase II Prospective Cohort Study [NCT04443543]Phase 2222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-22Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study of Second-line Irinotecan Plus Brivanib, a Dual Tyrosine Inhibitor of VEGFR and FGFR, in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Enriched for Elevated Levels of Plasma FGF Following Progression on Bevacizumab-based Treatment [NCT01367275]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor closed study)
S1613, A Randomized Phase II Study of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab (TP) Compared to Cetuximab and Irinotecan (CETIRI) in Advanced/Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) With HER-2 Amplification [NCT03365882]Phase 2240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-27Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase II/III Trial of Second Line Chemotherapy Comparing CPT-11 Monotherapy Versus S-1/CPT-11 Combination for S-1 Refractory Gastric Cancer [NCT00639327]Phase 2/Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Dose Finding Study (Phase I) of the Combination of ZD1839 (Iressa®) and an Oral Formulation of Irinotecan (Camptosar™) in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00132158]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Pilot Study of CS-1008 in Combination With FOLFIRI (Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]) in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Who Have Failed First-line Treatment That Was Not Irinotecan-based. [NCT01124630]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Multicentre, Open-label Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Capecitabine(Xeloda), and Oxaliplatin (IXO) as First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma. [NCT01129310]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Anticancer Drug-induced Cardiac Adverse Events in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Insights From the French County Calvados Registry [NCT03923036]2,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-04-30Not yet recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study of FOLFOX Followed by FOLFIRI or Reverse Sequence Treatment in Patients With Advanced or Relapsed Gastric Cancer [NCT01138904]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Phase IB/II Study of Second Line Therapy With Panitumumab, Irinotecan and Everolimus (PIE) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With KRAS WT [NCT01139138]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Temsirolimus in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT01141244]Phase 172 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
An Academic Prospective Single-arm Phase II Clinical Trial for Evaluation of Advanced Functional Neuroimaging Techniques and Molecular Markers in the Course of Anti-angiogenic Therapies in Malignant Gliomas [NCT01144988]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Recruiting
Open-label, Multicenter, Phase II Study Of First-line Biweekly Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin And Infusional 5-FU/LV (FOLFOXIRI) In Combination With Bevacizumab In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01163396]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of PS-341 Alone or in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) or Stomach [NCT00061932]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
PHASE I-II TRIAL OF METRONOMIC TEMOZOLAMIDE WITH INTERMITTENT INTENSIFICATION AND IRINOTECAN IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA [NCT01308632]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase III Trial of Cisplatin and Irinotecan (NSC-616348) Versus Cisplatin and Etoposide in Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (E-SCLC) [NCT00045162]Phase 3671 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Oral Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Combination With Intravenous Irinotecan for Patients With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00022698]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-05-31Completed
A Phase 1b/2, Open-Label Study of Amivantamab Monotherapy and in Addition to Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT05379595]Phase 1/Phase 2225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-29Recruiting
A Phase 2 Single-Arm Study of M6620 in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Progressive TP53 Mutant Gastric and Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancer [NCT03641313]Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-16Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study of 2nd Line FOLFIRI Versus Modified FOLFIRI With PARP Inhibitor ABT-888 (Veliparib) (NSC-737664) in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02890355]Phase 2123 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of a Combination of MM-398 and Veliparib in Solid Tumors [NCT02631733]Phase 148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-31Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of IBI308 Versus Paclitaxel/Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Failure of First-line Treatment: a Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study (ORIENT-2) [NCT03116152]Phase 2190 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-10Completed
Phase III Trial of Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) Compared With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01219920]Phase 3244 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of DS-3201b, an EZH1/2 Inhibitor, in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT03879798]Phase 1/Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-15Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of PEP02 or Irinotecan in Combination With Leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil in Second Line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01375816]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Terminated(stopped due to efficacy interim analysis as per protocol)
A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (PCA) vs. Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (TPCA) in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastric Cancer [NCT00911820]Phase 288 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Randomized, Open, Multicenter Phase III Study With Capecitabine Plus Bevacizumab Versus Capecitabine Plus Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01249638]Phase 3516 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-12-31Recruiting
Phase II Study of S-1 in Combination With Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer [NCT02527824]Phase 231 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Open-Label Dose-Escalation Clinical Trial of CPI-613 in Combination With Modified FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer and Good Performance Status [NCT01835041]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
PERIOP-FOLFIRINOX: A Pilot Trial of Perioperative Genotype-guided Irinotecan Dosing of gFOLFIRINOX for Locally Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma [NCT02366819]Phase 436 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-11Recruiting
A Genotype-guided Phase I Study of Irinotecan Administered in Combination With 5-fluorouracil/Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) and Bevacizumab in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT01183494]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-12Completed
A Single-arm Phase II Downsizing Study of Irinotecan, Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (IXO) and Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment to Assess Conversion to Resectability of Liver-only Metastases in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Initially Unresectable Metas [NCT01293942]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Withdrawn
A Phase I Study of FOLFIRINOX Plus IPI-926 for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT01383538]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-23Completed
FOLFIRI or mFOLFOX6 as Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regiment After Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy With FOLFIRI in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer: a Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial [NCT01566942]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-06-30Not yet recruiting
Phase I Trial of Radioimmunotherapy (Y-90 M5A) in Combination With FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT01205022]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Patients With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Gastric Cancer Treated With Preoperative Systemic Chemotherapy Followed by Peritonectomy and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy [NCT01379482]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
An Open and Single-arm Prospective Clinical Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Combined With Re-radiotherapy in the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma [NCT05201326]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-22Recruiting
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy of Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin Versus Systemic Chemotherapy of Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma [NCT03771846]Phase 3188 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-01Recruiting
Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Second-line FOLFIRI + Panitumumab in Subjects With Wild Type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received FOLFOX + Panitumumab in First-line [NCT03751176]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-08Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of Radiosurgery Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent/Progressive Glioblastoma [NCT01086345]Early Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual)
A Phase I-II Trial of Capecitabine (Xeloda), Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in Combination With Bevacizumab in 1st Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01311050]46 participants (Anticipated)Observational2009-01-31Recruiting
Phase 1/2 Study of TPX-0005 (Repotrectinib) in Combination With Chemotherapy in Pediatric and Young Adult Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors and Primary Central Nervous System Tumors [NCT05004116]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-09Recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of Second-line Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Fluoropyrimidine- and Platinum-Pretreated Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT01136031]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Multi-arm Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study Of The Safety, Pharmacokinetics, And Pharmacodynamics Of The Dual Pi3k/Mtor Inhibitors Pf-04691502 And Pf-05212384 In Combination With Experimental Or Approved Anticancer Agents In Patients With Advanced Cancer [NCT01347866]Phase 1105 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Refer to Detailed Description for documentaion of Termination Statement.)
An Investigator Sponsored Phase I/II Study of Selinexor in Combination With Irinotecan in Adults With Solid Tumors [NCT05177276]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Withdrawn
Phase II Study of S-1 in Combination With Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer [NCT02527785]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Randomized Double-blind Phase III Trial of FOLF(HA)Iri vs FOLFIRI for Second or Third Line Therapy in Irinotecan-naïve Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01290783]Phase 3390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-12-31Active, not recruiting
Irinotecan Gastro-resistant Tablet. An Open Label Phase I, Dose Escalating Study Evaluating Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Oral Administration of Irinotecan in Adult Patients With Solid Tumors [NCT03295084]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-15Completed
Risk-Adapted Focal Proton Beam Radiation and/or Surgery in Patients With Low, Intermediate and High Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma Receiving Standard or Intensified Chemotherapy [NCT01871766]Phase 298 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-04Active, not recruiting
A Phase Ib, Dose Escalation Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Humanized Anti-VEGF Monoclonal Antibody(Sevacizumab) Injection Plus FOLFIRI in Chinese Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02453464]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Recruiting
Phase II, Multicentric Randomized Trial, Evaluating the Efficacy of Fluoropyrimidine-based Standard Chemotherapy, Associated to Either Cetuximab or Bevacizumab, in KRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Progressive Disease After Receivi [NCT01442649]Phase 2133 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
International Randomized Phase II Trial of the Combination of Vincristine and Irinotecan With or Without Temozolomide (VI or VIT) in Children and Adults With Refractory or Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma [NCT01355445]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Phase 3 Study of Eryaspase in Combination With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as 2nd-Line Treatment of Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT03665441]Phase 3512 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-15Completed
FIRST-LINE FOLFOXIRI PLUS BEVACIZUMAB FOLLOWED BY REINTRODUCTION OF FOLFOXIRI PLUS BEVACIZUMAB AT PROGRESSION Versus FOLFOX PLUS BEVACIZUMAB FOLLOWED BY FOLFIRI PLUS BEVACIZUMAB AT PROGRESSION IN FIRST- AND SECOND-LINE TREATMENT OF UNRESECTABLE METASTATIC [NCT02339116]Phase 3654 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRI + Panitumumab as First-line Treatment in Elderly Patients With RAS/BRAF Wild-type Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Good Performance Status [NCT03142516]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-31Completed
mFOLFOXIRI Compared to mFOLFOX6 or CapeOx as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIIB or Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Research [NCT05200299]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-01Recruiting
A Prospective Observational Cohort Study Evaluating Resection Rate in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Aflibercept in Combination With FOLFIRI - Observatoire résection [NCT05178745]140 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2016-09-07Active, not recruiting
Phase 1b Trial of 5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Irinotecan in Combination With Temozolomide (FLIRT) and Bevacizumab for the First-line Treatment of Patients With MGMT Silenced, Microsatellite Stable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. [NCT04689347]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Recruiting
Irinotecan Loaded Drug-eluting Beads (DEBIRI) for the Treatment of Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer - An Observational Study and Patient Registry [NCT03697044]240 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-01-31Not yet recruiting
Xenotransplantation of Primary Cancer Samples in Zebrafish Embryos [NCT03668418]120 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-06-01Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Pamrevlumab or Placebo in Combination With Either Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03941093]Phase 3284 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-10Active, not recruiting
RAPID Feasibility Study: A Pilot Study for the Rapid Infusion of Dinutuximab [NCT05421897]Phase 411 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-24Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Pembrolizumab-based Therapy in Previously Treated High Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinomas [NCT03136055]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-20Completed
Irinotecan for Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated Using Anthracyclines- and Taxanes-containing Regimens: Protocol for a Phase II, Open-label, Single-arm Trial [NCT03562390]Phase 2124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-01Active, not recruiting
Endostar Combined With IP Second-line Treatment of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Prospective, Single Arm Phase II Clinical Study [NCT03797625]Phase 276 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-04Recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Single-arm Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Eribulin Mesilate in Combination With Irinotecan in Children With Refractory or Recurrent Solid Tumors [NCT03245450]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-05Completed
A Phase I Study of Intracranially Administered Carboxylesterase-Expressing Neural Stem Cells in Combination With Intravenous Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas [NCT02055196]Phase 10 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to New study written)
Phase II Trial of Modified FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer After Failure of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin Chemotherapy [NCT03778593]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Completed
Irinotecan-based Triplet (FOLFOXIRI) as Perioperative Treatment in Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma. [NCT03773367]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-14Recruiting
A Single-center, Single-arm, Open-label Clinical Study of Fruquintinib Combined With Tislelizumab and HAIC in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastases Cancer Who Failed Standard Therapy [NCT05435313]Phase 239 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-12Recruiting
Sequential Use of Nab-paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine and mFOLFIRINOX as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Control Study [NCT03750669]Phase 2416 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-20Recruiting
A Multinational, Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm, Phase II Study of G17DT Immunogen in Combination With Irinotecan in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Refractory to Previous Irinotecan-based Chemotherapy. [NCT02118064]Phase 2161 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-03-31Completed
An Open Labeled, Single-Arm, Multicentre Phase II Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Weekly Irinotecan Plus Cisplatin As First-Line Chemotherapy For Advanced Or Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma Of The Uterine Cervix [NCT00136955]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Dose-regimen Finding Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Activity of Oratecan in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies [NCT02250157]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-05Completed
Phase Ib Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Chemoembolization With Irinotecan-Eluting Beads for the Treatment of Hepatic Metastases [NCT01336985]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-28Terminated
Avelumab Added to FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab Followed by Avelumab Maintenance in Patients With Previously Untreated RAS Wild-type Colorectal Cancer. The Phase II FIRE-6 Study [NCT05217069]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-27Active, not recruiting
Avelumab Combined With Cetuximab and Irinotecan for Treatment Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Microsatellite Stable Cancer - A Proof of Concept, Open Label Non-randomized Phase IIa Study. The AVETUXIRI Trial [NCT03608046]Phase 259 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-03Recruiting
Prospective Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI for Potentially Resectable Cholangiocarcinoma [NCT03603834]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-19Recruiting
SHR-1210, a Novel Anti-PD-1 Antibody, in Combination With Apatinib and Irinotecan/Paclitaxel Liposome Plus Nedaplatin in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: a Phase II Study [NCT03603756]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-31Recruiting
The Effect of FOLFIRINOX and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced, Non-Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02128100]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Recruiting
Randomised, Multicentre, Phase II Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With FOLFIRI-aflibercept Compared to Initial Treatment With FOLFIRI-aflibercept (for 6 Cycles) Followed by Maintenance With 5FU-aflibercept, in an Elderly Populat [NCT03279289]Phase 2170 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-25Completed
A Phase I Study of Mebendazole for the Treatment of Pediatric Gliomas [NCT01837862]Phase 1/Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-10-22Recruiting
Cetuximab Plus Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) for Locally Advanced (Non-Metastatic), Clinically Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: A Phase II Trial With Molecular Correlates [NCT00109850]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Closed due to poor accrual)
A Phase I/II Study of Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS102) in Combination With Nanoliposomal Irinotecan (NAL-IRI) in Advanced GI Cancers [NCT03368963]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-30Recruiting
A Phase Ia Study on Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome Alone in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT05086822]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-09Completed
Phase I Feasibility and Safety Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Irinotecan in Relapsed or Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Followed by Maintenance Nivolumab [NCT04173325]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-06Terminated(stopped due to Closed by the IRB 5/26/22 due to non-compliance)
Open-label, Randomized, Comparative Phase 2 Study of Combination Immunotherapy Plus Standard-of-care Chemotherapy Versus Standard-of-care Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT04390399]Phase 2328 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-21Recruiting
Phase I Trial of FOLFIRI in Combination With Sorafenib and Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies [NCT01383343]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Pilot Study Evaluating An Allogeneic GM-CSF-Transduced Pancreatic Tumor Cell Vaccine (GVAX) and Low Dose Cyclophosphamide Integrated With Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Adenoca [NCT01595321]19 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-29Active, not recruiting
Docetaxel, Irinotecan, Recurrent, Refractory, Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas [NCT01380275]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-04-30Recruiting
Clinical Phase II Clinical Study Evaluating the Toxicity and Efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX Associated With SBRT (Stereotactic Radiotherapy) in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03891472]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-01Completed
A Phase I Trial of Irinotecan and BKM120 in Previously Treated Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT01304602]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of Anus-preservation in Low Rectal Adenocarcinoma Based on MMR/MSI Status(APRAM) [NCT05669092]Phase 3174 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-01Recruiting
Phase II Study of Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine as the First-line or Second-line Treatment for Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT01322152]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Phase 2 Single-Arm, Open Label Study Of Irinotecan In Combination With Temozolomide In Children With Recurrent Or Refractory Medulloblastoma And In Children With Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Glioma. [NCT00404495]Phase 283 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (TPCA) in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastric Cancer [NCT00394433]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
SHR-1316, a Novel Anti-PD-L1 Antibody, in Combination With Irinotecan Liposome and Fluorouracil in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: a Phase II Study [NCT03732508]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-30Recruiting
Phase II Study of Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan (Camptosar™) in Children With Recurrent, Progressive, or Refractory Malignant Gliomas, Diffuse/Intrinsic Brain Stem Gliomas, Medulloblastomas, Ependymomas and Low Grade Gliomas [NCT00381797]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Oxaliplatin (OXAL) Plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) With or Without Cetuximab (C225) After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer [NCT00079274]Phase 33,397 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Induction Chemotherapy With FOLFIRINOX ( 5 Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatine and Irinotecan) Followed by Short Course Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT05868317]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-01Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination With Irinotecan as a Second Line Therapy in Patients With Cholangiocarcinoma [NCT04059562]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-28Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Treatment Selection Based Upon Tumor Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00098787]Phase 2247 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-08Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study: Sequencing Topoisomerase Inhibitors for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): Topotecan Sequenced With Etoposide/Cisplatin, and Irinotecan/Cisplatin Sequenced With Etoposide [NCT00057837]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-14Completed
Phase II Trial of Irinotecan/Docetaxel for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer, With Randomization Between Irinotecan/Docetaxel and Irinotecan/Docetaxel Plus C225 a Monoclonal Antibody to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGF-r) [NCT00042939]Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-09Completed
A Phase Ⅱ Study of Different Doses of Irinotecan and Cisplatin for First-line Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer Treatment [NCT02171325]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-30Recruiting
An Open Label, Multi-Center Phase 1b/2a Trial Investigating Different Doses of Sym004 in Combination With FOLFIRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Progressing After First-Line Therapy [NCT02568046]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-15Terminated(stopped due to Discontinued development of Sym004 in combination with FOLFIRI)
An Exploratory, Open-label, Multicenter Phase 1b Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Sym021 (Anti-PD 1) in Combination With Either Sym022 (Anti-LAG-3) or Sym023 (Anti-TIM-3) or Sym023 and Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent Advanced Selected Solid [NCT04641871]Phase 1148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-12Active, not recruiting
Phase I Trial of OSI-774 and CPT-11 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00045201]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-13Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer in Combination With Allopurinol and MycoPhenolate (CLAMP Trial) [NCT05049863]Phase 1/Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-27Recruiting
PHASE 1/2 STUDY TO EVALUATE PALBOCICLIB (IBRANCE®) IN COMBINATION WITH IRINOTECAN AND TEMOZOLOMIDE OR IN COMBINATION WITH TOPOTECAN AND CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT OR REFRACTORY SOLID TUMORS [NCT03709680]Phase 2184 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-24Recruiting
Naxitamab and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Patients With High-Risk Neuroblastoma With Primary Refractory Disease or in First Relapse. An International, Single-Arm, Multicenter Phase 2 [NCT04560166]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-08Terminated(stopped due to Due to business priorities)
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-Label Basket Study of Navicixizumab Monotherapy or in Combination With Paclitaxel or Irinotecan in Patients With Select Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT05453825]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-05Recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study of Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Cancer (NivoPlus) [NCT02423954]Phase 1/Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Investigator no longer at site to enroll patients or write up data)
Irinotecan-Eluting Bead (DEBIRI) for Unresectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer After Systemic Chemotherapy Failure [NCT03175016]Phase 2/Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-20Recruiting
A PHASE II SINGLE-ARM STUDY OF CETUXIMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN AS RECHALLENGE 3RD-LINE TREATMENT OF KRAS, NRAS AND BRAF WILD-TYPE IRINOTECAN-PRETREATED METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS PROGRESSING AFTER AN INITIAL RESPONSE TO A 1ST-LINE CETUXIMAB-CONTAININ [NCT02296203]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study to Investigate Genotype-based Dose Individualization of Irinotecan in Asian Cancer Patients [NCT00731276]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-03Completed
Cisplatin Combined With Irinotecan or Etoposide for Untreated Extensive-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Multicenter Randomized Control Clinical Trial [NCT02323737]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Phase IB Study FOLFIRINOX and NIS793 in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer [NCT05417386]Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-09Recruiting
A Phase II Study of AK112 With or Without AK117 for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT05382442]Phase 2114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-27Recruiting
Totally Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI Chemotherapy Followed by Short-course Radiation and XELOX Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer:an Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter Phase II Study. [NCT03484221]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-01Recruiting
A Phase I Trial Assessing Several Schedules of Oral S-1 in Combination With a Fixed Dose of Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Digestive Adenocarcinoma as First- or Second-line Treatment [NCT02387138]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of 2-weekly Raltitrexed Plus Irinotecan Regimen (RAILIRI) Versus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Regimen (FOLFIRI) as Second-line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT02376452]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Recruiting
Anlotinib and Irinotecan for Advanced Ewing Sarcoma After Failure of Standard Multimodal Therapy [NCT03416517]Phase 1/Phase 247 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-22Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Plus Lobaplatin Versus Irinotecan for the Second-line Treatment of Relapsed Small-cell Lung Cancer [NCT03613753]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-01Recruiting
Irinotecan Plus Cisplatin Compared With Etoposide Plus Cisplatin for Extensive Stage Small-cell Lung Cancer: a Multi-center, Randomized, Open Label Study [NCT02348450]Phase 4308 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-design Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LY01610 (Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome Injection) Versus Topotecan in Patients With Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) [NCT06128837]Phase 3686 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Parallel Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy of Cannabidiol (BRCX014) Combined With Standard-Of-Care Treatment in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma, Glioblastoma Multiforme, and GI Malignancies [NCT03607643]Phase 1/Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-15Not yet recruiting
Phase I/II Study of the Combination of Irinotecan and POF (Paclitaxel Plus Oxaliplatin Plus 5-fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin) and Tislelizumab [NCT05319639]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-16Recruiting
A Single-Arm Phase II Study of Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Chemotherapy With Floxuridine and Dexamethasone in Combination With Systemic Chemotherapy for Patients With Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to the Liver [NCT03366155]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-24Recruiting
Prospective Study of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using Diffusion-Weighted Abnormality Versus Chemotherapy for Recurrent/Progressive Glioblastoma After Second-line Chemotherapy [NCT05718466]Phase 335 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
To Evaluate the Clinical Effect of Irinotecan Monotherapy in Treatment of Local Recurrence or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Who Accepted at Least 2 Kinds of Chemotherapy Regimens Including Antharcycline or Taxanes. [NCT02030678]Phase 2124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI Chemotherapy Alone in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT02217020]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-15Completed
A Parallel Phase II Study With Irinotecan/Cetuximab (Until PD) Followed by XELOX/Cetuximab (Until PD) vs the Reverse Sequence in Metastatic CRC With Previous Benefit on Irinotecan/Bevacizumab Based Therapy [NCT00755534]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to poor accrual)
Phase II Study of Short-course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy With the Triplet FOLFOXIRI as Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: the ShorTrip Study [NCT05253846]Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-25Recruiting
PERIOPERATIVE TREATMENT WITH COI-B (CAPECITABINE, OXALIPLATIN, IRINOTECAN AND BEVACIZUMAB) OF HIGH RISK OR BORDERLINE RESECTABLE COLORECTAL CANCER LIVER METASTASES [NCT02086656]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Mesylate Apatinib Combined With Irinotecan in Treatment of Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03651219]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-08Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study of Anti-GD2 3F8 Antibody and GM-CSF for High-Risk Neuroblastoma [NCT00072358]Phase 2291 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Response Adapted Neoadjuvant Therapy in Gastroesophageal Cancers (RANT-GC Trial) - a Phase Ib Feasibility Trial [NCT05733689]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase III Multicenter Open-label Randomized Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Folfirinox (FFX) Versus Combination of CPI-613 With Modified Folfirinox (mFFX) in Patients With Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas [NCT03504423]Phase 3528 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-09Completed
Randomized Study of Vincristine, Dactinomycin and Cyclophosphamide (VAC) Versus VAC Alternating With Vincristine and Irinotecan (VI) for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) [NCT00354835]Phase 3481 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-26Completed
A Phase 1 With Expansion Cohort, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Intravenously Infused IT-141 in Subjects With Recurrent or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT03096340]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-23Terminated(stopped due to Terminated by sponsor.)
To Observe the Pathological Remission Rate and Safety of FOLFOXIRI for Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-risk Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer With a Single-arm, Open, Prospective Phase II Exploratory Clinical Study [NCT05018182]Phase 269 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-02Recruiting
An Open-Label, First-in-Human Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of VX-970/M6620 in Combination With Cytotoxic Chemotherapy in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT02157792]Phase 1200 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-10Completed
Cadonilimab Plus mFOLFIRINOX as Conversion Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer:A Prospective, Single-arm, Phase II Trial [NCT06153368]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-19Not yet recruiting
Cetuximab Plus FOLFOXIRI vs Cetuximab Plus FOLFOX in Patients With Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis [NCT03493048]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-15Active, not recruiting
[NCT03067792]Phase 352 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Intraventricular Omburtamab-based Radioimmunotherapy for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent Medulloblastoma and Ependymoma [NCT04743661]Phase 262 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-04Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Capecitabine and Irinotecan With or Without Amifostine in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT03702985]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-28Recruiting
Post-resection/Ablation Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Prospective, Randomized, Open, Multicenter Phase III Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Active Post-resection/Ablation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Canc [NCT05008809]Phase 3507 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-06Recruiting
Phase 1/2 Study of Gemcitabine/Taxotere/Xeloda (GTX) in Combination With Cisplatin and Irinotecan in Subjects With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02324543]Phase 1/Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Surufatinib Combine With Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy for Second-line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer:An-open ,Single-arm,Multic-centers Ⅰb/Ⅱ Study. [NCT04929652]Phase 1/Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Recruiting
A Clinical Study of TQB3616 Capsules Combined With Anlotinib Hydrochloride Capsules or Standard Chemotherapy Second-line and Above in the Treatment of Advanced Lung Cancer [NCT04924192]Phase 2126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-18Recruiting
Trans-arterial Chemoembolization With Irinotecan Drug-eluting Beads Before Liver Surgery for Patients With Primary Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT04912258]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-01Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomised, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study Of Sunitinib In Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil And Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) As First Line Treatment [NCT00457691]Phase 3768 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
An Open-labelled, Randomized Phase II Study to Investigate Efficacy of Autologous Lymphoid Effector Cells Specific Against Tumour-Cells (ALECSAT) in Patients With GBM Measured as Progression Free Survival Compared to Avastin/Irinotecan [NCT02060955]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Substantial design modifications required.)
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Surgical Conversion Rate in Patients Receiving FOLFOXIRI +/- Cetuximab for Unresectable Wild-Type KRAS/NRAS Colorectal Cancer With Metastases Confined to the Liver [NCT02063529]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib, Irinotecan and Temozolomide in the Treatment of Refractory or Recurrent Neuroblastoma in Children: an Open, Single Arm, Single Center, Phase II Clinical Study [NCT04842526]Phase 227 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-12Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Trial Assessing a Regorafenib-irinotecan Combination (REGIRI) Versus Regorafenib Alone in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients After Failure of Standard Therapies, According to the A/A Genotype of Cyclin D1 [NCT03829462]Phase 378 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-28Recruiting
A Randomized, Phase I/II Trial of Irinotecan and Temozolomide Compared to Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Combination With TPI 287 in Patients With Primary Refractory or Early Relapsed Neuroblastoma [NCT01505608]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of Enrollment)
A Phase 2 Study of Onvansertib in Combination With Nanoliposomal Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and Fluorouracil for Second-Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [NCT04752696]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-03Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With 5-FU/Leucovorin (FL) vs. TS-1/Irinotecan in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT01269216]Phase 2136 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Systemic Therapy With a Loco-regional Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The SMART Study [NCT04276857]27 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
Phase I/II Study of OH2 Injection, an Oncolytic Type 2 Herpes Simplex Virus Expressing Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, in Malignant Solid Tumors [NCT03866525]Phase 1/Phase 2300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-02Recruiting
Conversion From Unresectable To Resectable Liver Metastases In Patients With Liver-Only Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab. The Conversion Trial. [NCT03401294]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
International, Multi-Center, Open-label, Treatment Extension Study of Iniparib as Monotherapy or in Combination Chemotherapeutic Regimens in Cancer Patients Who Have Derived Clinical Benefit From Iniparib Following Completion of a Phase 1, 2 or 3 Parental [NCT01593228]Phase 337 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Study to Document Long-term Safety and Continued Benefit of Irinotecan and Carboplatin or Irinotecan in Subjects 1 - 21 Years of Age With Refractory Solid Tumors Who Have Experienced Clinical Benefit Following a Minimum of 6 Cycles of Therapy on BMS Pro [NCT00990912]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Evaluation of Polychemotherapy With XELOXIRI-3 in Elderly or Frail Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (ALIX) [NCT03974854]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-08Recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Study of SLOG vs mFOLFIRINOX as the First-line Treatment in Locally Advanced Uncresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03443492]Phase 2130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-26Enrolling by invitation
A Blinded, Randomized, Phase 1/2 Study of Brivanib Alaninate vs Placebo in Combination With Erbitux and Irinotecan K-Ras Wildtype Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00594984]Phase 1/Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Phase II Single Arm Trial of FOLF(HA)Iri Plus Cetuximab in Irinotecan-naïve Second Line Patients With KRAS Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02216487]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-30Recruiting
Randomized Open-label Phase III Study Comparing Perioperative FOLFIRI Versus Adjuvant FOLFIRI in Resectable Advanced Colorectal Cancer Failed to Oxaliplatin-containing Treatment [NCT02087475]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Recruiting
A Randomised Clinical Trial of Treatment for Fluorouracil-Resistant Advanced Colorectal Cancer Comparing Standard Single-Agent Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Plus Panitumumab and Versus Irinotecan Plus Ciclosporin [Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in C [NCT00389870]Phase 31,198 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Phase I Study of Drug-Eluting Irinotecan Beads (DEBIRI) in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Liver-Only or Liver-Predominant Disease [NCT02110953]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-29Terminated(stopped due to IRB study closure by investigator due to low enrollment)
Phase I/II Trial Of Weekly Irinotecan And Docetaxel With The Addition Of Celecoxib In Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00073866]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Phase II Study for the Evaluation of CPT-11 (Irinotecan, Camptosar) in Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Breast Cancer [NCT00004182]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of FOLFOXIRI Compared to FOLFOX in First Line Treatment of Chemo-naive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02128425]Phase 2162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Recruiting
The Pilot Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of FIRINOX for Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02148549]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
A Phase Ib, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Multiple Doses of Dulanermin Administered Intravenously in Combination With Camptosar®/Erbitux® Chemotherapy or the Folfiri Regimen With or Without Bevacizumab in Subjects [NCT00671372]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Phase Ib Study of hPV19, a Novel Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Against Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF),in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Refractory to Standard Therapy. [NCT03503604]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-01Not yet recruiting
GRECCAR 8 : Impact on Survival of the Primary Tumor Resection in Rectal Cancer With Unresectable Synchronous Metastasis a Randomized Multicenter Study [NCT02314182]Phase 35 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-20Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy of Paclitaxel Versus Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Progress Following First-line Therapy [NCT01224652]Phase 3518 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalRecruiting
A Phase II Study Evaluating the Use of Concurrent Cetuximab, Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin and UFT in the First Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01225744]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Study Of ARQ 197 in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-type KRAS Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy [NCT01075048]Phase 1/Phase 2131 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-26Completed
Randomized Multicenter Phase II/III Study With Adjuvant Gemcitabine Versus Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02172976]Phase 2/Phase 340 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Phase I Study of Erbitux™ (Cetuximab) in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00110357]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Open, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing 5FU/ FA Plus Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab Versus 5FU/FA Plus Irinotecan as First-line Treatment for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-expressing Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00154102]Phase 31,221 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Retrospective Study on the Efficacy and Tolerability of Liposomal irinotecanN (MM398, PEP02, Onivyde) for the Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. [NCT05095064]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-09-27Active, not recruiting
Serial Measurements of Molecular and Architectural Responses to Therapy (SMMART) Trial: Adaptive Clinical Treatment (ACT) [NCT05238831]Early Phase 125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
A Dose Finding and Phase II Study of Selumetinib (AZD6244) (Hyd-Sulfate) in Combination With Irinotecan, in 2nd Line Patients With K-ras or B-raf Mutation Positive Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01116271]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Combination Therapy of Niraparib and Irinotecan in Cancers With Mutations in DNA Repair Genes [NCT05694715]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-23Recruiting
AD HOC Trial: Artificial Intelligence-Based Drug Dosing In Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT05669339]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Study of Dinutuximab, Sargramostim (GM-CSF), and Isotretinoin in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide in the Post-Consolidation Setting for High-Risk Neuroblastoma [NCT04385277]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-31Active, not recruiting
Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Anaplastic Wilms Tumors (DAWT) and Relapsed Favorable Histology Wilms Tumors (FHWT) [NCT04322318]Phase 2221 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-19Recruiting
A Phase 2 Randomized Study of Irinotecan/Temozolomide/Dinutuximab With or Without Eflornithine (DFMO) in Children With Relapsed, Refractory or Progressive Neuroblastoma [NCT03794349]Phase 295 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-08Recruiting
Pediatric Hepatic Malignancy International Therapeutic Trial (PHITT) [NCT03533582]Phase 2/Phase 3537 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-24Recruiting
Treatment of Children With All Stages of Hepatoblastoma With Temsirolimus (NSC#683864) Added to High Risk Stratum Treatment [NCT00980460]Phase 3236 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-14Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of MM-398 in Combination With Ramucirumab After Platinum Failure in Gastric Cancer [NCT03739801]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-06Withdrawn(stopped due to PI left)
A Phase II Study of Cetuximab Rechallenge in Combination With Irinotecan in Advanced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Without KRAS or NRAS or BRAF Mutation (All Wild Type) for Patients Pretreated With FOLFIRI and Cetuximab in First Line With Stopping Cetuxima [NCT02316496]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-23Terminated
Study to Investigate Efficacy of Bevacizumab Combined With Modified-FOLFOXIRI in Patients With Borderline Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases [NCT03711240]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-08Recruiting
CLINICAL MULTICENTER STUDY OF PHASE II AND RADIOBIOLOGY ASSESSING Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy With Irinotecan (Campto) IN THE TREATMENT OF LIVER METASTASIS AND / OR PULMONARY, Unoperated or Recurrent After Surgery of a Colorectal Cancer [NCT01220063]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-19Completed
Phase II Study of Drug-eluting Irinotecan Beads (DEBIRI) in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Liver-only or Liver-predominant Disease [NCT01285102]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to This study was closed early by the DSMB due to increased toxicity.)
A Single-arm,Open Lable Study of Sequential Therapy of Camrelizumab Combined With Chemotherapy(Irinotecan Plus Platinum)and With Apatinib in Participants With Untreated Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer(SCLC) [NCT04453930]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-08Recruiting
Phase 2 Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of ABT-165 Plus FOLFIRI vs Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated With Fluoropyrimidine, Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab [NCT03368859]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-20Terminated(stopped due to Study may continue)
A Two-part, Open-label, Randomized, Phase 2/3 Study of Dinutuximab and Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan for Second Line Treatment of Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT03098030]Phase 2/Phase 3483 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-01Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of mFOLFOX vs. mFOLFIRI in Advanced or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancer Refractory to First Line Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin [NCT03464968]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-29Completed
SAMSUNG MEDICAL CENTER [NCT03110510]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-06Withdrawn(stopped due to institution problem)
Phase I Study of IRNEA (Irinotecan, Etoposide, Cytarabine) for Refractory or Relapsed Acute Leukemia in Children and Adolescents [NCT01239485]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-11-30Recruiting
FOLFOX and Bevacizumab With or Without Irinotecan in First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Randomized Phase II Study [NCT01321957]Phase 2250 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Treatment Intensification With CIAH Plus Systemic Chemotherapy to Systemic Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Liver-only Colorectal Metastases Considered Still Non Resectable After at Least Two Months of Systemic Ind [NCT03164655]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-25Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Triple Blinded, Parallel, Active Controlled Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial of Stivant (AryoGen Trastuzumab) Efficacy and Safety in Comparison to Avastin in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT03288987]Phase 3126 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-04Completed
Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of JK1201I in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT05158491]Phase 1/Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-11Recruiting
Adjuvant Modified FOLFOXIRI Versus mFOLFOX6 in Patients With Postoperative MRD Positive Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Open Lable Randomized Phase 3 Study (AFFORD) [NCT05427669]Phase 3340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-09Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Eploratory, Open Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Plus Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma [NCT03387904]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-13Recruiting
Phase II Simvastatin + Cetuximab/Irinotecan in K-ras Mutant Colorectal Cancer Patients Who Have Failed Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy [NCT01281761]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Pilot / Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Systemic Therapy to Cytoreduction + Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Mitomycin C + Standard Systemic Therapy in Patients With Limited Peritoneal Dissemination of Colon Adenocarcinoma [NCT01167725]Phase 3340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-08-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Clinical Trial of Rapamycin and Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT01282697]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-22Completed
A Phase II Prospective Trial of mXELOXIRI Reintroduction for the Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT04508452]Phase 291 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-18Recruiting
BOND-3: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Irinotecan, Cetuximab, and Bevacizumab Compared With Irinotecan, Cetuximab, and Placebo in RAS-Wildtype, Irinotecan-Refractory, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02292758]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-12Completed
A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Phase II Study of Camrelizumab Combined With Irinotecan or Albumin Paclitaxel for Second-line Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT05669807]Phase 2184 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-31Not yet recruiting
Trabectedin and Irinotecan in Pediatric Refractory Sarcomas [NCT02509234]30 participants (Anticipated)Observational2014-02-28Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid (FOLFIRI) With or Without the Addition of an Endothelin Receptor Antagonist in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure of Oxaliplatin-Containing Chemotherapy [NCT01205711]Phase 2111 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Cisplatin, and Bevacizumab in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma [NCT00084604]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Phase II Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intraperitoneal and System Chemotherapy Versus XELOX as First-line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT03792269]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-01Recruiting
A Randomized Investigation of Side Effects to FOLFOXIRI in Combination With Tocotrienol or Placebo as First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02705300]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-06Active, not recruiting
Optimizing Ultrasound Enhanced Delivery of Therapeutics [NCT04821284]Phase 1/Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-06Recruiting
PIONEER-Panc: Phase II Investigations of New and Emerging Therapies for Pancreatic Cancer [NCT04481204]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-04-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Induction Systemic mFOLFIRINOX Followed by Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Floxuridine and Dexamethasone Given Concurrently With Systemic mFOLFIRI as a First-Line Therapy in Patients With Unresectable Liver-Dominant Intrahepatic Cholangio [NCT04251715]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-28Recruiting
A Phase IIa (Pilot) Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Folinic Acid, 5-FU, Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) With Digoxin in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT04141995]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-12Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Radioimmunotherapy (Y-90 M5A) Following Hepatic Resection and FOLFIRI or FOLFOX Chemotherapy [+/-BEVACIZUMAB], or Xelox for Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma to the Liver [NCT01320683]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual.)
A Phase II Trial of External Beam Radiation Therapy and Cetuximab Followed by Irinotecan and Cetuximab for Children and Young Adults With Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Pontine Tumors and High-Grade Astrocytomas (POE08-01) [NCT01012609]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-30Completed
Liposomal iRInotecan, Carboplatin or oXaliplatin in the First Line Treatment of Esophagogastric Cancer: a Randomized Phase 2 Study [NCT03764553]Phase 2310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-01Recruiting
A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Study of Bevacizumab Combined With Biweekly XELOX/XELIRI Alternative First-line Treatment for Unresectable Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT04324476]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-01Recruiting
Phase I Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Response With PF-05082566, Cetuximab, and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT03290937]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-27Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of AZD1775 (MK-1775) in Combination With Oral Irinotecan in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT02095132]Phase 1/Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-28Completed
Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Regorafenib in Combination With FOLFIRI Versus Placebo With FOLFIRI as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01298570]Phase 2181 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-07Completed
An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Phase I/II Trial Investigating 2 EMD 525797 Doses in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan Versus Cetuximab and Irinotecan Alone, as Second-line Treatment for Subjects With K-ras Wild Type Metastatic [NCT01008475]Phase 1/Phase 2232 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Chemotherapy With FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab (AvastinR) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Bearing Genotype UGT1A1*1/UGT1A1*1 or UGT1A1*1/UGT1A1*1/UGT1A1*28: Prospective, Phase II, Multicenter Study [NCT00628810]Phase 286 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Multicenter Random Assignment Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Alvocidib (Flavopiridol) Versus Irinotecan Alone for Patients With p53 Wild Type Gastric Adenocarcinoma [NCT00991952]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
CPT-SIOP-2009: Intercontinental Multidisciplinary Registry and Treatment Optimization Study for Patients With Choroid Plexus Tumors [NCT01014767]Phase 327 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Terminated(stopped due to PI departure from coordinating institution)
A Multicentre Randomised Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Resectability in Patients With Initially Unresectable Liver Metastases Secondary to Colorectal Cancer Receiving First-line Treatment Either With mFOLFOX-6 Plus Bevacizumab or FOLFOXIRI Plus [NCT00778102]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A PHASE III RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF FOLFOXIRI + BEVACIZUMAB VERSUS FOLFIRI + BEVACIZUMAB AS FIRST- LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER [NCT00719797]Phase 3509 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan as Single Agent in the Third Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric Cancer. [NCT02662959]Phase 293 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Recruiting
Randomized, Active-Controlled, Open-Label Phase 2 Study of CS-7017 in Combination With FOLFIRI in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Failed First-Line Therapy [NCT00967616]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Prospective Pilot Trial to Assess a Multimodal Molecular Targeted Therapy in Children, Adolescent and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory High-grade Pineoblastoma [NCT02596828]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of High Dose Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan in Colorectal Cancer Patients With KRS-Wild Type Tumors Who Progressed After Failure of Prior Standard Dose ofCetuximab Plus Irinotecan [NCT01004159]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated(stopped due to former PI left institute)
A Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of SCH 717454 in Combination With Different Treatment Regimens in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors (Phase 1B/2; Protocol No. P04722) [NCT00954512]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-25Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated for business reasons.)
A Randomized Phase II Study of Dual Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition With Erlotinib and Panitumumab With or Without Irinotecan as Second Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00940316]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-18Completed
A Phase II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SI-B001 as a Single Agent or in Combination With Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Digestive System Malignancies (Colorectal and Gastric Cancer) [NCT05039944]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Company research strategy adjustment)
Effect of Second-line Irinotecan and Capecitabine Versus Irinotecan Alone in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Patients Progressed After First-line Gemcitabine and Cisplatin: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT02558959]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
A Phase II Study Of Sunitinib In Combination With Irinotecan, L-leucovorin, And 5-Fluorouracil In Patients With Unresectable Or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00668863]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of ARQ 197 Versus Investigator's Choice of Second-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Have Progressive Neoplastic Disease Following Treatment With One Prior Chemotherapy Regimen [NCT01070290]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
Maintenance and Reinduction Chemotherapy With Avastin in Metastatic Colon Cancer: The MARTHA (SICOG 0803) Trial [NCT00797485]Phase 3672 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Recruiting
Prospective Evaluation of Low-dose Irinotecan and Cyberknife® Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Limited Liver Metastasis [NCT01847495]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to no patients enrolled)
Phase Ib Study To Evaluate The Safety Of Combining IGF-1R Antagonist R1507 With Multiple Standard Chemotherapy Drug Treatments In Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00811993]Phase 1104 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Terminated
A Phase I Trial of LY231514 With Irinotecan Administered Intravenously Every 21 Days in Patients With Metastatic Cancer [NCT00003711]Phase 10 participants Interventional1997-09-30Completed
Randomized Phase II Study of Weekly Irinotecan/Carboplatin (ICb) With or Without Cetuximab (Erbitux) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00248287]Phase 2154 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-28Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Therapeutic Strategies Combining Bevacizumab With Chemotherapy: De-escalation Versus Escalation in Patients With Non-pretreated Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02842580]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Inclusion rythm too slow.)
Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Panitumumab as Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma [NCT00836277]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Panitumumab Plus Irinotecan Followed by Panitumumab Plus AMG 479 in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Expressing Wild Type KRAS and Refractory to Oxaliplatin-or Irinotecan- and Oxaliplatin-containing Regimens to Evaluate Mecha [NCT00891930]Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Second-line Zimberelimab and SIRIOX Chemotherapy for Patient With Previously AG Chemotherapy Treated Pancreatic Cancer: A Prospective, Single Arm, Phase II Clinical Study [NCT06166589]Phase 219 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
An Open-label, Multi-center Phase I/Ib Dose Finding and Expansion Study of HRO761 as Single Agent and in Combinations in Patients With Microsatellite Instability-High or Mismatch Repair Deficient Advanced Solid Tumors. [NCT05838768]Phase 1327 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-27Recruiting
Phase II Clinical Trial of PLX038 in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, and Fallopian Tube Cancer [NCT05465941]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-22Recruiting
A Randomized Phase I/II Study of Talazoparib or Temozolomide in Combination With Onivyde in Children With Recurrent Solid Malignancies and Ewing Sarcoma [NCT04901702]Phase 1/Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-09Recruiting
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 1a/1b Study of IGM-8444 as a Single Agent and in Combination in Subjects With Relapsed, Refractory, or Newly Diagnosed Cancers [NCT04553692]Phase 1430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-23Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Etirinotecan Pegol (NKTR-102) in Patients With Refractory Brain Metastases and Advanced Lung Cancer or Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) [NCT02312622]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Preoperative Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: Cisplatin-Irinotecan Followed by Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Cisplatin and Irinotecan. [NCT00590031]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Perioperative FOLFIRINOX for Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Pilot Study [NCT02782182]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-28Terminated(stopped due to Closed early due to poor accrual.)
A Phase I Study of AZD2281 in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Incurable Colorectal Cancer [NCT00535353]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-02Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter Study of IBI308 in Subjects With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT02937116]Phase 1233 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-19Completed
A Study to Characterize and Evaluate Biomarkers of Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer In The First-line Setting [NCT03532711]264 participants (Actual)Observational2012-01-01Completed
A Phase II Study of PEP02 as a Second Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00813163]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Phase II Two Arm Trial of the Proteasome Inhibitor, PS-341 (Velcade TM) in Combination With Irinotecan or PS-341 Alone Followed by the Addition of Irinotecan at Time of Progression in Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma o [NCT00103259]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Phase II Study: Individualization of Dosage of Irinotecan in the FOLFIRI According to the Genetic Polymorphism of UGT1A1 in the First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01963182]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Early-Line Anti-EGFR Therapy to Facilitate Retreatment for Select Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT04587128]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-19Recruiting
A Pilot and Feasibility Study of PD-1 Blockade With Nivolumab in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT03970252]Early Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-24Recruiting
Neoadjuvant Folfirinox or Gemcitabine-Nab Paclitaxel Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03600623]Early Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-25Terminated(stopped due to PI left the institution; no further accruals)
A Phase 2 Randomized, Open-Label Study of RRx-001 vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02096354]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Determination of the UGT1A1 Polymorphism as Guidance for Irinotecan Dose Escalation in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With First-Line Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI (PURE FIST) [NCT02256800]213 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-13Completed
A Phase 1B/2A Trial Of CEND-1 In Combination With Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Based Therapies In Pancreatic, Colon And Appendiceal Cancers (CENDIFOX) [NCT05121038]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-20Recruiting
A Multinational, Randomized, Phase III Study of FOLFIRI With/Without Bevacizumab Versus Irinotecan With/Without Bevacizumab As Second-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT03303495]Phase 3280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-14Recruiting
Efficacy and Tolerance of Cetuximab Combined With Irinotecan or Fluorouracil as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With RAS-wild-type Incurable Advanced Colorectal Cancer (Confirm Study) [NCT02071069]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-31Recruiting
Phase I Trial of Adagrasib (MRTX849) in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Colorectal Cancer [NCT05722327]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-06Recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Sitravatinib in Combination With Tislelizumab in Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma That Progressed on or After Ant [NCT05461794]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-03Active, not recruiting
Phase II Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blinded Study With 5-FU vs. 5-FU With IM862 With Cross-Over to CPT-11 vs. CPT-11 With IM862 [NCT00006037]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Drug not available)
Randomised Study to Investigate FOLFOXIRI Plus Cetuximab vs. FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment of BRAF-mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT04034459]Phase 2109 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-25Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Peri-Operative Modified Folfirinox in Localized Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02047474]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-25Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Combination With Existing High Dose Alkylator Based Chemotherapy for Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ewing Sarcoma [NCT01864109]Phase 283 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Study of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI With or Without Hepatic Arterial Infusion as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Wild Type RAS Who Have Unresectable Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer [NCT03069950]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of accrual)
Single-arm Phase II Study of Maintenance Therapy With Aflibercept After First-line Treatment With FOLFIRI Plus Aflibercept in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT02129257]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-26Completed
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Liposomal Irinotecan in Combination With Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma: Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-GI15-067 [NCT03861702]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-02Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Cabiralizumab (BMS-986227, FPA008) Administered in Combination With Nivolumab (BMS-936558) With and Without Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03336216]Phase 2206 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-19Completed
A Prospective, Open-lable, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Irinotecan Versus Oxaliplatin in the First-line Treatment of Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT03567629]Phase 2130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-29Active, not recruiting
Phase 2 Evaluation of a Community-Based Multi-modality Management Algorithm for Clinically Non-metastatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Exocrine Pancreas or Ampulla [NCT02626520]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-11Terminated(stopped due to Study team felt toxicity of study regimen outweighed potential benefit.)
An Open-label, Randomized, Phase III, Multicenter Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Individualized Intraperitoneal and System Chemotherapy Versus System Chemotherapy as First-line Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT03061058]Phase 3240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-04-01Recruiting
A Single-arm, Multicenter, Open-labeled, Phase II Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Carelizumab Combined With Irinotecan and Apatinib in the Second-line Treatment of Locally Advanced Unresectable, Recurrent or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of Stomach and Ga [NCT04934618]Phase 285 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-19Recruiting
A Randomized, Parallel Control Trial to Compare mFOLFOX Versus mFOLFIRI Versus FOLFPTX (a Combination of Paclitaxel, Fluorouracil) as First-line Treatment in Advanced Gastric Cancer or Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction [NCT03045770]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-10Not yet recruiting
A Phase 3 Study of Dinutuximab Added to Intensive Multimodal Therapy for Children With Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Neuroblastoma [NCT06172296]Phase 3478 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-14Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter, Multi-cohort, Randomized, Phase II Study of Irinotecan Liposome Combined With 5-FU / LV and Oxaliplatin for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer With or Without Addebelizumab [NCT06172036]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-20Not yet recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Irinotecan Combined With Anlotinib in Patients With Pretreated Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT03545711]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-26Recruiting
Irinotecan Plus Thalidomide in Second Line Advanced Gastric Cancer : A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled and Prospective Trial [NCT02401971]Phase 4900 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-08-31Recruiting
A Phase Ib Trial of Eribulin in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolamide in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT06006273]Phase 1/Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-16Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Perioperative mFOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel as Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT02562716]Phase 2147 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-06Completed
A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Phase Ⅱ Study of The Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of JMT101 and Irinotecan Combined With SG001 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) [NCT06089330]Phase 2102 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
CAMPFIRE: Children's and Young Adult Master Protocol for Innovative Pediatric Research [NCT05999994]Phase 2105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-22Recruiting
Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy of M9241 in Combination With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump (HAIP) and Systemic Therapy for Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer or Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma [NCT05286814]Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-24Recruiting
Multicenter Open-label, Phase II Trial, to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Nal-IRI for Progressing Brain Metastases in Patients With HER2-negative Breast Cancer (The Phenomenal Study) [NCT03328884]Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-02Recruiting
A Phase I Trial of Vemurafenib in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With BRAF V600 Mutant Advanced Solid Malignancies [NCT01787500]Phase 133 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-02-15Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Trial Using Irinotecan, Vincristine, and Dexamethasone In Children With Relapsed And/Or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00718757]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Open, Multicenter Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Panitumumab With Irinotecan in Patients With Wild-Type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Irinotecan Based Chemotherapy [NCT00958386]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
PACCE: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled, Clinical Trial of Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab With and Without Panitumumab in the First-Line Treatment of Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00115765]Phase 31,053 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-01Completed
A Phase 0 Study of EGF-Depleting Therapy CIMAvax-EGF in Combination With Standard Therapy for RAS- and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT06011772]Early Phase 142 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-02Recruiting
Modified FOLFIRINOX Alternated With Biweekly Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel in Untreated Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas [NCT04672005]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-06Recruiting
A Phase II, Open-label Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Activity of Liposomal Irinotecan in Combination With 5-FU and Oxaliplatin in Preoperative Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (NEO-Nal- IRI Study) [NCT03483038]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-13Active, not recruiting
Ramucirumab Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Gastric or Gastro-esophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma [NCT03141034]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-01Completed
A Phase Ib Clinical Study of BBI608 in Combination With Standard Chemotherapies in Adult Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT02231723]Phase 1139 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan in Recurrent Anaplastic Astrocytoma or Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT00921167]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
A Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind Study, Comparing the Efficacy of Aflibercept Once Every 2 Weeks Versus Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (MCRC) Treated With Irinotecan / 5-FU Combination (FOLFIRI) After Failure of an Oxalipla [NCT00561470]Phase 31,226 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Randomized, Phase III, Multicenter Trial Comparing Two Different Sequences of therapyFOLFOX-4 vs FOLFOX-4 Followed by Irinotecan/Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Patients Treated With FOLFIRI /Bevacizumab as First Line Chemotherapy [NCT01030042]Phase 3110 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Phase I/II Trial for Patients With Recurrent Resectable Glioblastoma Multiforme Using Surgery With Implantable BCNU Polymer Followed by Post-operative Irinotecan and Bevacizumab [NCT00984438]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No accrual)
Phase II Trial of Etoposide Plus Cisplatin Compared With Irinotecan Plus Cisplatin for First-line Treatment of Non-primary Pancreatic Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor G3 Type [NCT03963193]Phase 2112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab and Irinotecan for Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas Immediately Following Tumor Progression After Treatment w/Bevacizumab Alone: A Companion Trial to NCI Study 06-C-0064 (NCT00271609)(Bevacizumab Alone for Recurre [NCT00393094]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to the limitations of accrual.)
An Open-label Phase II Trial of Panitumumab Plus Irinotecan for Patients With Advanced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Without KRAS Mutation (Wild-type) in Third-line Chemotherapy (FOLFOX/XELOX ± Bevacizumab and Irinotecan Alone or FOLFIRI/CAPIRI ± Bevacizum [NCT00655499]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of Avastin, Irinotecan, High Dose 24 Hour Continuous Intravenous Infusion of Floxuridine and Leucovorin in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00449163]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-01Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated by University of Miami Institutional Review Board)
Randomized Phase II Study of ECF-C, IC-C, or FOLFOX-C in Metastatic Esophageal and GE Junction Cancer [NCT00381706]Phase 2245 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-15Completed
Multi-Centre Phase III Open Label Randomized Trial Comparing CPT-11 In Combination With A 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen To The Same 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen Alone, As Adjuvant Treatment After Resection Of Liver Metastases For Colorectal Cancer. [NCT00143403]Phase 3321 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Docetaxel in Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma [NCT00183872]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-14Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Study of Napabucasin (GB201) in Combination With FOLFIRI Versus Napabucasin in Adult Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC) [NCT03522649]Phase 3668 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-12Recruiting
An Efficacy and Safety Study of mXELIRI Versus. FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab Therapy as First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT04247984]Phase 2264 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-01Completed
FIRE-5 -Study: Optimal Anti-EGFR Treatment of mCRC Patients With Low-Frequency RAS Mutation [NCT04034173]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1 Open-label Dose Escalation Trial of BI 1701963 in Combination With Irinotecan in KRAS Mutation Positive Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT04627142]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-23Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision)
A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Eryaspase in Combination With Modified FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [NCT04292743]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-02Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of Intracranially Administered Carboxylesterase-Expressing Neural Stem Cells in Combination With Intravenous Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas [NCT02192359]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-07Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1b/2a Multi-center Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics of CTX-009 (ABL001) in Combination With Irinotecan or Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors [NCT04492033]Phase 1/Phase 292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-22Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of IMMU 130 (hMN-14-SN38 Antibody Drug Conjugate) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01915472]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No participants enrolled)
An Open Label, Single-arm, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and the Feasibility of Bevacizumab (Avastin) Based on a FOLFOXIRI Regimen Until Progression in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma(OPAL-Study) [NCT00940303]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Intraperitoneal Irinotecan With Concomitant FOLFOX and Bevacizumab for Patients With Unresectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases [NCT06003998]Phase 285 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-27Recruiting
Evaluation of FDOPA-PET/MRI in Pediatric Patients With CNS Tumors, A Feasibility Study [NCT01999270]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin / Irinotecan / Bevacizumab Followed by Docetaxel / Bevacizumab in Inoperable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients [NCT00952003]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Phase I Trail of Temodar Plus O6-Benzylguanine (O6-BG) (NSC 637037) Plus Irinotecan (CPT-11) (NSC 616348) in the Treatment of Patients With Recurrent / Progressive Cerebral Anaplastic Gliomas [NCT00612638]Phase 196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A 2-part Trial Comparing Overall Survival of Patients With Metastatic Ewing's Sarcoma Treated With Vigil Versus Gemcitabine and Docetaxel and to Determine Safety Profile of Vigil in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide. [NCT02511132]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-10Completed
NEO-adjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer [NCT06094140]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-20Recruiting
An Open-label, Multi-centre, Randomized Study of TaRgeted Intratumoural Placement of P-32 (OncoSil™) in Addition to FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy vs FOLFIRINOX Alone in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. [NCT05466799]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-26Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study Evaluating Abemaciclib in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Ewing's Sarcoma [NCT05440786]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-20Recruiting
A Phase One Study of Intravenous Irinotecan and Bortezomib in Children With Recurrent/Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma [NCT00644696]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Multi-arm Phase I Trial of Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Irinotecan With 1) Systemic Bevacizumab 2) Systemic Bevacizumab and Oxaliplatin 3) Systemic Bevacizumab and Cetuximab in Patients With Advanced Cancers Metastatic to the Liver [NCT00980239]Phase 1115 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI Chemotherapy Alone for Extramural Vascular Invasion(EMVI) Positive Rectal Cancer: A Phase II, Single-arm, Prospective Clinical Study [NCT04170530]Phase 251 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Recruiting
Phase II Study on NIVolumab in Combination With FOLFOXIRI/Bevacizumab in First Line Chemotherapy of Advanced COloRectal Cancer RASm/BRAFm Patients [NCT04072198]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-26Recruiting
Phase II Study of Avastin Plus Erbitux Plus Irinotecan as 2nd Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Patients Achieving Disease Progression as Best Response After 1st Line Treatment With FOLFIRI+Avastin or XELIRI+Avastin [NCT00681876]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to poor accrual)
Phase 2 Clinical Trial Treating Relapsed/Recurrent/Refractory Pediatric Solid Tumors With the Genomically-Targeted Agent Sorafenib in Combination With Irinotecan [NCT02747537]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-24Withdrawn(stopped due to Could not recruit participants for the study)
A Phase Ⅱ Open Label, Non Randomized Study, in Which Sorafenib is Used in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin and Fluorouracil in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer After Failure of Oxaliplatin Treatment [NCT00839111]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-11-30Recruiting
Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Capecitabine and Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT00875771]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase 1 Dose Finding Study of the gFOLFOXIRITAX Regimen Using UGT1A1 Genotype-directed Irinotecan With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Taxotere in Patients With Untreated Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinomas: The I-FLOAT Study [NCT04361708]Phase 154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-08Recruiting
European Proof-of-Concept Therapeutic Stratification Trial of Molecular Anomalies in Relapsed or Refractory Tumors [NCT02813135]Phase 1/Phase 2460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-03Recruiting
A Genotype-Guided Dosing Study of FOLFIRABRAX in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies [NCT02333188]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
A Phase II/III Study of Dalotuzumab (MK-0646) Treatment in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00614393]Phase 2558 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-24Completed
A Controlled Randomized Double-blind Multi-center Phase II Study of FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI Combined With Sorafenib Versus Placebo in Second-line Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00889343]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Terminated
A Phase I Study of Irinotecan in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors Who Are Concomitantly Receiving Anticonvulsants [NCT00008424]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-10-31Completed
Chemotherapy Intensification in Patients With High Lactate Dehydrogenase Values and Soluble Syndecan-1 Levels [NCT03117972]Phase 2177 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-04Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Irinotecan and Cetuximab on an Every 2 Week Schedule, as Second Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00336856]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase Ia/II, Single Arm Trial on the Efficacy of Vemurafenib in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT04790448]Phase 1/Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-27Completed
Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerance to Chemotherapy With 5-fluorouracil, Folinic Acid, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00467142]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-23Completed
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Radiation in Combination With Capecitabine & Paniumumab With and Without Irinotecan in Patients With Localized Rectal Cancer [NCT00967655]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-07-31Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan + Temozolomide in Children With Recurrent Neuroblastoma [NCT00311584]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Phase III Randomized Open-Label Study of Single Agent Pembrolizumab vs Physicians' Choice of Single Agent Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Irinotecan in Subjects With Advanced/Metastatic Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus That Have Pro [NCT03933449]Phase 3123 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-29Completed
EXCITE: Erbitux, Xeloda, Campto, Irradiation Then Excision for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (North West Clinical Oncology Group-04 on Behalf of the NCRI Rectal Cancer Subgroup) [NCT00972881]Phase 1/Phase 282 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase I Clinical Trial to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose and to Assess the Safety and Pharmacokinetic Profile of OratecanTM in Patients With Advanced Solid Cancer((Q1DX5/W)X2 for 3W) [NCT00986843]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab With or Without Enzastaurin in Patients With Recurrent Colorectal Cancer [NCT00437268]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial Of Irinotecan In Combination With Three Different Methods Of Administration Of Fluoropyrimidine: Infusional 5-FU (FOLFIRI), Modified-Bolus 5-FU (Day 1 & 8), And Oral Capecitabine (Day 1-14); With Celecoxib Versus [NCT00101686]Phase 3547 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
Clinical Study of Irinotecan,Oxaliplatin, and S1 in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03726021]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-26Completed
A Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of ABX-EGF in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00111761]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Irinotecan for Treatment of Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer [NCT00100828]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Closed due to early stopping rule)
A Phase II Trial of Preoperative FOLFIRINOX Followed by Gemcitabine Based Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT01897454]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-27Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated due to slower than anticipated accrual)
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Combination of Irinotecan, Xeloda and Oxaliplatin (IXO) Regimen With Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00819754]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Terminated
A Prospective, Open, Comparative Multicentre Phase II Study for the Evaluation of Irinotecan and Capecitabine Versus Cisplatin and Capecitabine in Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma or Gastric-Oesophagal Junction [NCT00675194]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Study of Monoclonal FOLFOX6m + mAb Alone or in Combination With Liver Chemoembolization (Lifepearls-Irinotecan) in Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Metastatic Disease Limited to the Liver With Poor Prognosis [NCT04595266]Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-29Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan as a 2nd-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure to Irinotecan That Express Wild-type KRAS With and Without Detectable EGFR Expression [NCT00637091]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Open Label, Non Randomized, Phase Two Trial in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) With the Combination of m FOLFIRI Plus Aflibercept as First Line Treatment: MINOAS Trial [NCT02624726]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Triplet Combination With Irinotecan Plus Oxaliplatin,Continuous Infusion 5-Fluorouracil And Leucovorin Plus Cetuximab As First Line Treatment In Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Pilot Phase II Trial [NCT00689624]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Phase III Trial of Irinotecan-Based Chemotherapy Plus Cetuximab (NSC-714692) or Bevacizumab (NSC-704865) as Second-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Progressed on Bevacizumab With Either FOLFOX, OPTIMOX or XELOX [NCT00499369]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to inadequate accrual, study was terminated and limited outcome data was reported.)
Neoadjuvant Therapy of Gastric Cancer With Irinotecan, Cisplatin and Cetuximab Followed by Surgical Resection and Adjuvant Chemoradiation [NCT00857246]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Pilot Phase II Study of Triplet Chemotherapy Regimen in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Patients With Resectable Colorectal Cancer [NCT02688023]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-03-31Recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial of Nivolumab Alone, Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab, or Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in Participants With Microsatellite Instability High (MSI-H) or Mismatch Repair Deficient (dMMR) Metastatic Colorectal [NCT04008030]Phase 3831 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-05Recruiting
A Phase Ib Dose Escalation Study of MM-398 Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Unresectable Advanced Cancer - DOUBLIRI [NCT02640365]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-18Completed
A Phase I Genotype-Directed Dose-Escalation Study of Irinotecan (NSC616348, CPT-11, Camptosar) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00708773]Phase 168 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Randomized Phase III Study of Systemic Therapy With or Without Hepatic Arterial Infusion for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: The PUMP Trial [NCT05863195]Phase 3408 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-19Not yet recruiting
Phase I Trial of Irinotecan Plus Lenalidomide in Adult Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT00671801]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-29Terminated(stopped due to Toxicity)
Neuroblastoma Protocol 2008: Therapy for Children With Advanced Stage High Risk Neuroblastoma [NCT00808899]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Voluntarily closed and terminated by the PI due to lack of feasibility)
A Prospective, Randomized, Active-Control, Multi-Center Study Assessing Overall Survival Using Chemotherapy With or Without Impedance-Based Radiofrequency Ablation for Subjects With Colorectal Cancer and Incurable Metastatic Liver Disease, Failing at Leas [NCT00510627]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Boston Scientific has decided to close the Study.)
Genotype-directed Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Rectal Carcinoma [NCT00682786]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Bevacizumab in Combination With Irinotecan for Malignant Gliomas [NCT00268359]Phase 268 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of KRN330 Plus Irinotecan After First-Line or Adjuvant FOLFOX/CapOx Failure in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00838578]Phase 1/Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Per protocol, the study was terminated based on interim analysis results)
A Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blinded Clinical Study of KD018 as a Modulator of Irinotecan Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00730158]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Floxuridine and Dexamethasone in Combination With Intravenous Oxaliplatin Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Unresectable Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer. [NCT00695201]Phase 152 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomised, International Trial Comparing mFOLFIRINOX Triplet Chemotherapy to mFOLFOX for High-risk Stage III Colon Cancer in Adjuvant Setting [NCT02967289]Phase 3792 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-27Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Capecitabine With or Without Irinotecan Driven by UGT1A1 in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT02605265]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Recruiting
INST 0802: Phase II Trial of Combination Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin and Cetuximab for Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00871169]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
RESILIENT: A Randomized, Open Label Phase 3 Study of Irinotecan Liposome Injection (ONIVYDE®) Versus Topotecan in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Progressed on or After Platinum-based First-Line Therapy [NCT03088813]Phase 3491 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-25Completed
A Phase II Study of Pre-operative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab With Early Salvage Therapy Based on PET Assessment of Response in Patients With Locally Advanced But Resectable Gastric and GEJ Adenocarcinoma [NCT00737438]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Irinotecan (Campto®) in Combination With Capecitabine (Xeloda®) as First-Line Chemotherapy in Asian Subjects With Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00635323]Phase 273 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Surufatinib Combined With Irinotecan as a Second-line Treatment for Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Single-arm, Prospective, Exploratory Clinical Study [NCT05595889]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase II, Single-arm Study to Evaluate The Safety and Efficacy of Apatinib Combined With Irinotecan and S-1 (ApaIRIS) in Treating Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer After Chemotherapy With Albumin-bound Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine Regimen [NCT04101929]Phase 2126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-01Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, 2-arm, Phase II Study With a Safety lead-in Phase Evaluating the Combination of Encorafenib and Cetuximab Versus Irinotecan/Cetuximab or Infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid (FA)/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuxim [NCT05004350]Phase 2103 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-14Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Trial of Vorinostat in Combination With Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma [NCT00762255]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Phase I Study of BBI608 Administered With FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab in Adult Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02641873]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Bevacizumab With Irinotecan or Bevacizumab With Temozolomide in Recurrent Glioblastoma [NCT00433381]Phase 2123 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-01Completed
A Phase II Study of Definitive Concurrent Radiation Therapy With Cisplatin and Irinotecan Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced In-operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT02275806]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Terminated(stopped due to PI decided to terminate study)
A Pilot Study of the Addition of Bevacizumab to Vincristine, Oral Irinotecan, and Temozolomide (VOIT Regimen) for Relapsed/Refractory Pediatric Solid Tumors [NCT00786669]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Panitumumab as 3rd Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Without KRAS Mutations [NCT00792363]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Phase II Trial Of Weekly Irinotecan And Docetaxel In Recurrent Or Metastatic Head And Neck Carcinoma [NCT00040807]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-11-19Completed
A Randomized, Open-label Study Comparing the Effect of 3 Chemotherapy Regimens Containing Avastin on Time to Disease Progression in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01131078]Phase 2306 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Phase Ib/II Study of BGJ398 in Combination Modified FOLFIRINOX in Treatment-Naïve Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients [NCT02575508]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to drug supply issues)
A Phase 1/1B Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of SCH 717454 Administered in Combination With Chemotherapy in Pediatric Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors (Protocol No. 05883) [NCT00960063]Phase 14 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-11Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated for business reasons.)
A Phase II Study of Pre-Operative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Cetuximab, Irinotecan, and Capecitabine in Resectable Rectal Cancer [NCT00506844]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Active, not recruiting
Biomarker-oriented Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy in Chemotherapy -naïve Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT04447092]Phase 277 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of Temozolomide, Oral Irinotecan, and Vincristine for Children With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00138216]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A UGT1A1 Genotype-Guided Dosing Study of Irinotecan Administered in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) and Cetuximab as First-Line Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT02573220]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study terminated by PI due to inability to accrue.)
AN OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY OF SECOND-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT BEVACIZUMAB IN METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS WHO HAVE RECEIVED FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS BEVACIZUMAB. [NCT00720512]Phase 3184 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Capecitabine and Avastin in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Who Have Progressed After 1ST Line Therapy With Folfox/Avastin. [NCT00717990]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Poor Accrual)
A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of the Safety and Clinical Effects of ON 01910.Na in Combination With Either Irinotecan or Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00861328]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Phase I Trial of Dose Escalation of Metformin in Combination With Vincristine, Irinotecan, and Temozolomide in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT01528046]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-24Completed
A Phase I Study of Allogeneic Ex Vivo Expanded Gamma Delta (γδ) T Cells (IND # 28460) in Combination With Dinutuximab, Temozolomide, Irinotecan, and Zoledronate in Children With Refractory, Relapsed, or Progressive Neuroblastoma [NCT05400603]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-06Recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase III Study of Lurbinectedin Single-Agent or Lurbinectedin in Combination With Irinotecan Versus Investigator's Choice (Topotecan or Irinotecan) in Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients (LAGOON Trial) [NCT05153239]Phase 3705 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-22Recruiting
A Phase 1b Study of Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) in Combination With REOLYSIN® (Pelareorep) and Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT02620423]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Study on Biomarkers for Predicting the Efficacy and Toxicities of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Based on Tissue and Plasma Exosome RNA [NCT04227886]250 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-12-01Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of EZN-2208 (PEG-SN38) Administered With or Without Cetuximab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma (mCRC) [NCT00931840]Phase 2220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Active, not recruiting
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Gastrectomy, Metastasectomy Plus Systemic Therapy Versus Systemic Therapy Alone: GYMSSA Trial [NCT00941655]Phase 315 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-22Completed
A Phase I and Early Efficacy Study of Convection Enhanced Delivery of Irinotecan Liposome Injection Using Real Time Imaging With Gadolinium in Children With Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma [NCT03086616]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of NKTR-102 Versus Irinotecan in Patients With Second-Line, Irinotecan-Naive, KRAS-Mutant, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) [NCT00856375]Phase 283 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
[NCT00832689]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Phase I Study of SU011248 Plus Irinotecan in the Treatment of Patients With Malignant Glioma [NCT00611728]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Single Arm Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Therapy Using Irinotecan Bead in Patients With Resectable Liver Metastases From Colorectal Cancer [NCT00844233]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study of the Safety and Clinical Effects of ON 01910.Na in Combination With Either Irinotecan or Oxaliplatin in Patients With Hepatoma and Other Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00861783]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial for Patient With Multi-organ, Colorectal Cancer Metastases Comparing the Combination of Chemotherapy and Maximal Tumor Debulking Versus Chemotherapy Alone. [NCT01792934]478 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Recruiting
A Phase I Study of a Combination of High Selenium Brassica Juncea With Irinotecan and Capecitabine [NCT00547547]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase 1b/2a Study of GC1118 in Combination With Irinotecan or FOLFIRI in Patients With Recurrent/Metastatic Solid Tumor [NCT03454620]Phase 1/Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-02Completed
Vitro 3D Drug Sensitivity Detection of Micro Tumor (PTC) Combined With Tumor Whole Exon (WES) Sequencing Technology to Guide Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment Strategy and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer [NCT05424692]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-01Recruiting
NAPOLI-2: Phase II Study of Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Nanoliposomal Irinotecan in Previously Treated Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer [NCT04005339]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-29Recruiting
Phase II Study Of Weekly Administration Oxaliplatin Plus 5-Fu/Lv (Aio Regimen) Plus Bevacizumab, Alternative With Irinotecan Plus 5-Fu/Lv(Aio Regimen) Plus Cetuximab, As Salvage Treatment In Pretreated Patients With Mcrc [NCT00755118]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Due to poor Accrual)
Chemotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer With Additional Chemo-radiotherapy for Patients With Borderline Resectable Tumours [NCT01397019]Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
A Protocol for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Rhabdomyosarcoma Using Molecular Risk Stratification and Liposomal Irinotecan Based Therapy in Children With Intermediate and High Risk Disease [NCT06023641]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
Second-Line Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Alone for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Progressed After First-line Gemcitabine and S-1: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT02558868]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
Circulating Tumor DNA Methylation Guided Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-risk Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Cohort Study (FINE Trial) [NCT05954078]Phase 3340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-31Recruiting
The Efficacy and Safety of Fruquintinib Combined With Chemotherapy as Third-line /Third-line+ Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Open, Single-center Study [NCT05928312]72 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-28Not yet recruiting
VITAS: Atezolizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy for Pediatric Relapsed/Refractory Solid Tumors: An Open-label, Phase II, Single-arm, Multi-center Trial [NCT04796012]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-18Recruiting
Docetaxel and Irinotecan Combination as a Second Line Treatment of Metastatic Gastric Cancer; a Phase II Multicenter Study [NCT04770623]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-05Completed
Irinotecan Combined With Cisplatin as 1st Line Treatment for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer : a Single Center Prospective Clinical Trial [NCT01051765]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-08-31Recruiting
A Randomized, Phase 2 Study Of FOLFOX Or FOLFIRI With AG-013736 Or Bevacizumab (Avastin) In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure Of An Irinotecan Or Oxaliplatin-Containing First-Line Regimen [NCT00615056]Phase 2171 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Open Label, Randomised Multicentre Phase III Study Of Irinotecan Hydrochloride (Campto (Registered)) And Cisplatin Versus Etoposide And Cisplatin In Chemotherapy Naive Patients With Extensive Disease - Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00143455]Phase 3485 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Gemcitabine, Nab-paclitaxel, Capecitabine, Cisplatin, and Irinotecan (GAX-CI) in Combination in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03535727]Phase 1/Phase 286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-21Recruiting
A Phase I/IB Study of OSI-906 and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Cancer With Expanded Cohorts of Patients With Colorectal Cancer Stratified by the OSI-906 Integrated Classifier [NCT01016860]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Terminated(stopped due to This study was discontinued due to a shown lack of efficacy in the investigational agent)
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Drug-eluting Beads Administered by Hepatic Chemoembolization With Intravenous Cetuximab (DEBIRITUX) Versus Systemic Treatment With Intravenous Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colore [NCT01060423]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to poor subject enrolment)
Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Novel PET/CT Imaging Biomarkers of CB-839 in Combination With Panitumumab and Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic and Refractory RAS Wildtype Colorectal Cancer [NCT03263429]Phase 1/Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-23Active, not recruiting
A Phase I, Open-label Study to Determine the Effect of Panitumumab on the Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan in Subjects With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00563316]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Bevacizumab-Based Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas and Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas [NCT00890786]Early Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Phase I Study of Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Combination With Twice Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy (45 Gy) or Once Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy (70 Gy) for Patients With Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00059761]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Irinotecan, Cisplatin, Bevacizumab and Concurrent Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma [NCT00354679]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase I/IIa, Single-Arm, Open Study of Apatinib and Irinotecan in Treating Patients With Recurrent High-grade Glioma [NCT02848794]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Recruiting
A Phase II Open-Label Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Patients With Previously Treated Locally Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma [NCT06178588]Phase 222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RC48-ADC for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer With HER2-overexpression [NCT04714190]Phase 3351 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-24Recruiting
Phase II Randomized Study of SIR-Spheres, Yttrium Microspheres With Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan for Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver [NCT00766220]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Slow Accrual and withdrawn/exclusion of 2 participants.)
Multicenter Phase III Randomized Study of FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Following or Not by a Maintenance Therapy With Bevacizumab in Patients With Non-Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00952029]Phase 2/Phase 3492 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, 3-Arm Phase 3 Study of Encorafenib + Cetuximab Plus or Minus Binimetinib vs. Irinotecan/Cetuximab or Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid (FA)/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab With a Safety Lead-in of Encorafe [NCT02928224]Phase 3702 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-13Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of PEP02, Irinotecan or Docetaxel as a Second Line Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma [NCT00813072]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Combination Irinotecan and Capecitabine as Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Locally Advanced/Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancers Who Progressed or Intolerant to Front-Line Gemcitabine and Platinum Combination [NCT02720601]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was never submitted to the IRB & never opened. PI is leaving institution.)
A Phase I Trial Using Combination Irinotecan and Thalidomide for Recurrent CNS Tumors. [NCT00251797]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial With Bevacizumab, Irinotecan and Cerebral Radiotherapy Versus Bevacizumab, Temozolomide and Cerebral Radiotherapy as First Line Treatment for Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT00817284]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Prospective Phase II Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Biosimilar (Samfenet®) Plus Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC) in Patients With HER2-positive Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumor [NCT04215159]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-30Not yet recruiting
Phase II Trial Irinotecan and Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy Concurrently With Etoposide/Cisplatin in Locally Advanced, Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00616785]Phase 241 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-06-30Recruiting
Phase II Treatment of Adults With Primary Malignant Glioma With Irinotecan Plus Temozolomide [NCT00616005]Phase 241 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Multi-center, Single-arm Study of Liposomal Irinotecan and Leucovorin/5-fluorouracil Plus Bevacizumab as Second-line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT06184698]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Compared With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Liposomal Irinotecan in Older Patients With Treatment Naïve Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (GIANT) [NCT04233866]Phase 2176 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Study of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemo-radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01867892]Phase 286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Enrolling by invitation
A Pilot Study of Molecularly Tailored Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01888978]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Ph 2 Trial of G-FLIP (Low Doses Gemcitabine, 5FU, Leucovorin, Irinotecan & Oxaliplatin), Followed by G-FLIP-DM (G-FLIP + Low Doses Docetaxel & MitomycinC), When Used in Combination With Vitamin C, in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01905150]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Multi-Line Therapy Trial in Unresectable Wild-Type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A GERCOR Randomized Open-label Phase III Study. [NCT01910610]Phase 3474 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-10-30Recruiting
Pharmacokinetic Study In Patients With Liver Predominant Unresectable mCRC Receiving Treatment With LifePearl Microspheres Loaded With Irinotecan [NCT02547480]15 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy and Toripalimab for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer: a Single-arm, Two-cohort, Phase II Trial (TORCH-R) [NCT05628038]Phase 293 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-18Recruiting
Phase 1b/II Trial of Carfilzomib With Irinotecan in Irinotecan-Sensitive Malignancies (Phase Ib) and Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients (Phase II) Who Have Progressed on Prior Platinum-based Chemotherapy [NCT01941316]Phase 1/Phase 2112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Recruiting
ESP1/SARC025 Global Collaboration: A Phase I Study of a Combination of the PARP Inhibitor, Niraparib and Temozolomide and/or Irinotecan in Patients With Previously Treated,Incurable Ewing Sarcoma [NCT02044120]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of Preoperative Chemotherapy With Ziv-aflibercept (Zaltrap) Followed by Postoperative Chemotherapy With or Without Ziv-aflibercept (Zaltrap) in Patients With Advanced Resectable Colorectal Cancer [NCT02046538]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigator terminated due to funding issues)
Optimal Control of Liver Metastases With Intravenous Cetuximab and Hepatic Artery Infusion of Three-drug Chemotherapy in Patients With Liver-only Metastases From Colorectal Cancer. A European Multicenter Phase II Trial [NCT00852228]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Active, not recruiting
Phase III Randomized Study of Intensive Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colon Cancer at High Risk of Recurrence [NCT00005979]Phase 30 participants Interventional1998-07-22Completed
Phase I Study of SU5416 in Combination With CPT-11 and Cisplatin in Patients With Solid Tumors [NCT00006000]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-08-31Completed
A Phase 2 Open-label Randomized, Controlled Trial of CS-1008 in Combination With Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Alone in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Who Failed First-line Oxaliplatin Based Regimen [NCT00969033]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Terminated
A Phase I Study of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Administered as a Prolonged Infusion in Adult Patients With Solid Tumors [NCT00001495]Phase 140 participants Interventional1995-11-30Completed
Phase I/II Study of Irinotecan and Whole Brain Radiation Therapy in Patients With Brain Metastases From Solid Tumors [NCT00389584]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
FOCUS 3 - A Study to Determine the Feasibility of Molecular Selection of Therapy Using KRAS, BRAF and Topo-1 in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00975897]Phase 2/Phase 33,240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Phase I Clinical Trial to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose and to Assess the Safety and Pharmacokinetic Profile of OratecanTM in Patients With Advanced Solid Cancer(Q1DX5/W for 3W) [NCT00979563]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of CPT-11 With Carboplatin in Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme Prior to Radiation Therapy [NCT00010036]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-05-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study Of Gemcitabine/Cisplatin, Gemcitabine/Docetaxel, Gemcitabine/Irinotecan, Or Fixed Dose Rate Infusion Gemcitabine In Patients With Metastic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00012220]Phase 2259 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Phase I Treatment of Adults With Primary Malignant Glioma With Irinotecan (CPT-11) (NSC- #6616348) Plus Temodar (NSC #362856) [NCT00005951]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-08-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine/Irinotecan as Second Line Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00005972]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-05-31Completed
Pediatric Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Irinotecan [NCT00016861]Phase 10 participants Interventional1998-09-30Completed
Neoadjuvant Conformal Radiotherapy and Concomitant CPT-11 and EGFR Inhibition With Cetuximab in Patients With Rectal Cancer Phase I Study [NCT00392470]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-08-31Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Consolidation or Salvage Chemotherapy by Using Weekly Docetaxel/Irinotecan After Cisplatin Plus Weekly 24-Hour Infusion of High-dose 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin for Non-resectable Gastric Cancers [NCT00166881]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT02942563]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-01Recruiting
Phase II Study of Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Antracycline and Taxane Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00532714]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Phase II Study of Erlotinib (Tarceva) Alternating With Chemotherapy for Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Molecular Correlates for p53 Pathway [NCT00642746]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to poor enrollment and grade 3 toxicities noted during an interim analysis.)
Open, Randomized, Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing the Combination of Cetuximab With Oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA Versus the Combination of Cetuximab With Irinotecan/5-FU/FA as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients With Non-Resectable Colorectal Liver [NCT00153998]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Phase I, Open Label, Multi-center Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of JMT101 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor. [NCT04689100]Phase 1259 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-11Recruiting
Phase IIa Study of Nimotuzumab Plus Irinotecan as Second-line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild Type K-ras [NCT05278728]Phase 1/Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Treatment of a Cancerous Disease of the Peritoneum With Complete Cytoreductive Surgery With Intraperitoneal Chemohyperthermia Using Oxaliplatin Plus Irinotecan [NCT00180960]Phase 2100 participants Interventional2003-06-30Terminated
Multicenter Phase II Trial of Weekly Taxotere and Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00819728]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-06-30Completed
[NCT00189657]Phase 30 participants InterventionalRecruiting
Phase I Study of Vorinostat [Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (VORINOSTAT)] With Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) for Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers [NCT00537121]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan (Camptosar), Cisplatin and Celebrex in Patients With Metastatic or Unresectable Esophageal Cancer [NCT00183807]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Insufficient Accrual)
Phase I Study of Irinotecan Administered as a Continuous Infusion and Radiation Therapy for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers [NCT00183846]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-12-31Completed
Phase I Study of Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Pazopanib in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Colorectal Cancer [NCT00540943]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-13Completed
Phase I Study Evaluating the Feasibility of Chemotherapy With Capecitabine, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Metastatic Carcinoma [NCT00544063]Phase 133 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-10-31Recruiting
Phase II Study of Temsirolimus and Irinotecan in Chemotherapy Refractory Patients With KRAS Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00827684]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Signature Stratification for Treatment [NCT04469556]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-14Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of ABT-263 in Combination With Erlotinib and ABT-263 in Combination With Irinotecan, and Evaluating the Safety of ABT-263 Monotherapy in Subjects With Cancer [NCT01009073]Phase 151 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Carboplatin and Irinotecan (CPT-11) as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00469898]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Combination Therapy With Thalidomide and CPT-11 in Patients With Recurrent Anaplastic Gliomas or Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT00412542]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized, Phase 2 Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of FOLFIRI With Either Panitumumab or Bevacizumab as Second-Line Treatment in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-type KRAS Tumors [NCT00418938]Phase 2266 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-01Completed
A Prospective Observational Study of the Efficacy and Safety of CPT-11 Based Regimens for UGT1A1 Genotype Guided Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01039506]1,376 participants (Actual)Observational2009-10-15Completed
A Randomised Fase I/II Trial With Irinotecan, Cetuximab and Everolimus (ICE)Compared to Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CapOx) for Patients With Gemcitabin Resistant Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01042028]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Emergence of FOLFIRINOX and slow recruitment)
Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study Of CPX-1 (Irinotecan HCl: Floxuridine) Liposome Injection In Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00361842]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Intensive Multi-Agent Therapy, Including Dose-Compressed Cycles of Ifosfamide/Etoposide (IE) and Vincristine/Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide (VDC) for Patients With High-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma [NCT00354744]Phase 3109 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Phase Ib Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety of Brivanib in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (5FU/LV) and Brivanib in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Gast [NCT01046864]Phase 149 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
INST 0601C: A Non-Randomized Phase II Protocol of Erlotinib for Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Non-Small Cell Carcinoma of the Lung [NCT00391586]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Terminated(stopped due to PI left institution.)
Phase I Treatment of Adults With Primary Malignant Glioma With Irinotecan (CPT-11) (NSC #6616348) Plus BCNU (NSC #409962) [NCT00002988]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-04-30Completed
A Multicenter Trial for Microarray Analysis of Colon Cancer Outcome-A (MACCO-A) [NCT00127036]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Terminated(stopped due to drug now on market)
Treatment of High Risk Renal Tumors: A Groupwide Phase II Study [NCT00335556]Phase 2291 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Three Different Regimens of CPT-11 Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin Compared to 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Colon and Rectum [NCT00003594]Phase 31,691 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-10-31Completed
A Real-world Observational Study of Fruquintinib in Combination With Irinotecan and Capecitabine for the Second-line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT06169202]50 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-06-01Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab Versus FOLFIRI as a Secondline Treatment in Patients With Advanced Neuroendocrine Carcinoma [NCT05015621]Phase 3194 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-18Recruiting
A Randomised Phase II/III Study to Compare the Combination of Carboplatin Plus Irinotecan Vs. the Combination of Carboplatin Plus Etoposide for SCLC in Extensive Disease Stage [NCT00168896]Phase 2/Phase 3286 participants Interventional2001-10-31Recruiting
A Feasibility Study for Individualized Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00276744]Phase 2249 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Because there was no longer an active laboratory component to this study.)
Intergroup Randomized Phase III Study of Postoperative Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin vs. Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin vs. 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Patients With Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Receiving Either Preoperative [NCT00068692]Phase 3225 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-15Completed
An Evaluation of Preoperative Chemotherapy With Irinotecan and Cisplatin for Advanced, But Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Coordinated Multidisciplinary, Multicenter Study Linking Functional Imaging, Genomic Expression Profiles and Histopathology [NCT00062374]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Phase II Evaluation of Gleevec Combined With Camptosar Plus Paraplatin in Patients With Previously Untreated Extensive Stage SCLC [NCT00193349]Phase 260 participants Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Phase 1, Open-label, Non-randomized, Dose-escalating Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Study of TAS-102 in Combination With CPT-11 and Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Tumors [NCT01916447]Phase 165 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
[NCT00034502]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase I Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Aflibercept in Combination With FOLFIRI Administrated Every 2 Weeks in Chinese Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies [NCT01930552]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Metformin Combined to Irinotecan for Refractory Metastatic or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer [NCT01930864]Phase 241 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-01Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of ABI-009 (NAB-RAPAMYCIN) in Pediatric Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Solid Tumors, Including CNS Tumors as a Single Agent and in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan [NCT02975882]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-15Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of Vincristine, Escalating Doses of Irinotecan, Temozolomide and Bevacizumab (Vit-b) in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Solid Tumors of Non-hematopoietic Origin [NCT00993044]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Pilot Study of Irinotecan in Patients With Breast Cancer and CNS Metastases [NCT01939483]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Prospective Study of Short Infusion of Ziv-Aflibercept in Combination With FOLFIRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01941173]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of accrual)
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase II Study to Compare AUY922 With Docetaxel or Irinotecan in Adult Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer, Who Have Progressed After One Line of Chemotherapy [NCT01084330]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
An Exploratory Study to Evaluate Radiotherapy Combined With Irinotecan Liposome and Apatinib Followed by PD-1 Antibody and Apatinib for the Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors That Failed Standard Treatments [NCT04569916]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-30Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Protocol Evaluating Safety of the Medtronic Pump and Codman Catheter for the Delivery of Hepatic Arterial Infusion (HAI) Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma or Cholangiocarcinoma [NCT04668976]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-25Recruiting
A Phase I Trial of Capecitabine or Continuous Infusion 5-Fluorouracil in Combination With Weekly Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies [NCT00215501]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Taxotere With Concurrent Radiotherapy as a Preoperative Treatment in Resectable Esophageal Cancer [NCT00318903]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
A Phase II Trial Evaluating Irinotecan With 5_fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Upper Gastrointestinal Tumours [NCT00220064]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of VELCADE TM(PS-341) and Irinotecan in the Treatment of Progressive, Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical, Vulvar, or Vaginal Cancer [NCT00106262]Phase 238 participants Interventional2005-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of accrual)
Phase I Study to Determine the Safety, Maximum Tolerated Dose, and Efficacy of Biweekly Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) in Combination With Gemcitabine, Irinotecan, and 5-FU/Leucovorin (G-Flie) in Patients With Metastatic Solid Tumors or Adenocarcinoma of the Exoc [NCT00220649]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Randomized Phase II/III Trial Comparing Folririnox Association [Oxaliplatin / Irinotecan / LV5FU2] Versus Gemcitabine in First Line of Chemotherapy in Metastatics Pancreas Cancers Patients [NCT00112658]Phase 2/Phase 3342 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
The Study of Irinotecan Plus Epirubicin as the Second-line Chemoregime for Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT01964027]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-10-31Not yet recruiting
Phase I-II Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel (GemBrax) Followed by Folfirinox as First Line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. [NCT01964287]Phase 1/Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-24Completed
An Open, Randomized, Parallel Control, Multiple-center Phase II Trial of Two Different Dosages of Irinotecan Combined With Cisplatin Scheme in Extensive Disease-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT01977235]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-09-30Recruiting
A Phase 1 Trial of MK-4280 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab With or Without Chemotherapy or Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT02720068]Phase 1576 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-02Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase III Study of 5-FU Continuous Infusion (5-FUci) Versus CPT-11 Plus CDDP (CP) Versus S-1 Alone (S-1) in Advanced Gastric Cancer (JCOG9912) [NCT00142350]Phase 3690 participants Interventional2000-11-30Completed
Pilot Study Combining Temozolomide, Oncovin, Camptosar and Oral Antibiotic in Children and Adolescents With Recurrent Malignancy [NCT00222443]Phase 140 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Followed by Definitive Surgery for Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Arm Pilot Study [NCT01992705]Early Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Multinational, Randomized, Phase III Study of XELIRI With/Without Bevacizumab Versus FOLFIRI With/Without Bevacizumab As Second-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01996306]Phase 3650 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-02Completed
Phase II Trial of Combination Therapy With S-1, Irinotecan, and Bevacizumab (SIRB) in Patients With Unresectable or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer [NCT00569335]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Phase I Study Of Irinotecan and Bevacizumab With Temozolomide in Children With Recurrent/Refractory Central Nervous System Tumors [NCT00876993]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Fruquintinib Plus Irinotecan Second-line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Single-arm, Open-label, Singer-center, Phase II Study [NCT05643677]Phase 247 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Pilot, Prospective, Non-randomized Evaluation of the Safety of Anakinra Plus Standard Chemotherapy Regimens in Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients [NCT02021422]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Escalating Doses of SU5416 (NSC 696819) in Combination With CPT-11 in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00005818]Phase 1/Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-03-31Completed
Phase I-II Trial of CPT-11 and Temozolomide (Temodar) in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma [NCT00006025]Phase 10 participants Interventional2001-01-05Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial of Preoperative Combined Modality Chemoradiation for Distal Rectal Cancer [NCT00006366]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Phase II Study of the Combination of Liposomal Irinotecan (Nal-IRI) and Pembrolizumab for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) With Brain Metastases (BM) [NCT05255666]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No drug)
Phase I Study of Oxaliplatin (NSC# 266046), Irinotecan, and Capecitabine in Patients With Solid Tumors [NCT00006465]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-12-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Fluorouracil (5-FU), Leucovorin (LV), Irinotecan (CPT-11) and Bevacizumab (Anti-VEGF) in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00006786]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-11-30Completed
Interracial Study of CPT-11 (Irinotecan) Pharmacokinetics in 5-Fluorouracil Refractory Colorectal Cancer: A Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Study of CPT-11 [NCT00006103]Phase 3400 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-07-31Completed
Alternation of FOLFOX6 (Oxaliplatin - Leucovorin - Fluorouracil) and FOLFIRI (Irinotecan - Leucovorin - Fluorouracil) as Second Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00006115]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-04-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Open-Label, Umbrella Platform Design Study of Investigational Agents With or Without Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) and/or Chemotherapy in Participants With Advanced Esophageal Cancer naïve to PD-1/PD-L1 Treatment (KEYMAKER-U06): Substudy 06A. [NCT05342636]Phase 1/Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-27Recruiting
A Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Chemotherapy in Chinese Participants With Stage IV Microsatellite Instability-High (MSI-H) or Mismatch Repair Deficient (dMMR) Colorectal Cancer (MK-3475-C66) [NCT05239741]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-02Recruiting
Exploiting Circulating Tumour DNA to Intensify the Postoperative Treatment of Stage III and High-risk Stage II Resected Colon Cancer Patients With Adjuvant FOLFOXIRI and/or Post-adjuvant Trifluridine/Tipiracil [NCT05062889]Phase 2477 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-17Recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Global Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) Versus Chemotherapy as Second Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Unresectable/Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Car [NCT03430843]Phase 3512 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-26Completed
Phase II Trial of Combination Therapy With Irinotecan, S-1, and Bevacizumab (IRIS/Bev) in Patients With Unresectable or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer [NCT00569790]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of Biweekly Administration Regimen of Paclitaxel Combined With CPT-11 in Patients With Second Line Chemotherapy of Inoperable or Recurrent Gastric Cancer(GC). [NCT00209612]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to due to strong side effect)
Phase II Study of Oral S-1 Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group HGCSG0302 [NCT00209651]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Active, not recruiting
Open Multicenter Phase II Study in Second-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: Combination of ALIMTA and Irinotecan Administered Every Two-Weeks [NCT00191984]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
An Open Label Study to Assess the Effect of FOLFIRI Plus Avastin and Cetuximab on Progression-free Survival in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. [NCT00577109]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was cancelled before patient enrollment)
A Genotype-guided Dosing Study of mFOLFIRINOX in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies [NCT01643499]Phase 179 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-26Completed
A Phase 1/2 Study of Venetoclax and Irinotecan in Relapsed/Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT04543916]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to AbbVie decided to stop trial involving Venetoclax for safety measures needed)
Preoperative ChemoRadiation And FOLFOXIRI To Escalate Complete Response for Rectal Cancer (CRAFTER) [NCT05358704]Phase 238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-13Recruiting
Apatinib Mesylate Combined With IT Regimen for the Treatment of Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Neuroblastoma: Multi-center, Single-arm, Phase II Clinical Study. [NCT05027386]Phase 262 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-26Recruiting
SARC037: A Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Safety of Trabectedin Administered as a 1-Hour Infusion in Ewing Sarcoma Patients in Combination With Low Dose Irinotecan and 3'-Deoxy-3'-18F Fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) Imaging [NCT04067115]Phase 1/Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-05Active, not recruiting
A Randomised Phase III Open Label Study of Regorafenib + Nivolumab vs Standard Chemotherapy in Refractory Advanced Gastro-Oesophageal Cancer (AGOC) [NCT04879368]Phase 3450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Recruiting
A Phase I/II Safety Lead in Study of Ex-Vivo Expanded Allogeneic Universal Donor TGFβi NK Cell Infusions in Combination With Irinotecan, Temozolomide, and Dinutuximab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: The Allo - STING Trial [NCT04211675]Phase 1/Phase 231 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab Plus Atezolizumab Versus FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment of Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients. [NCT03721653]Phase 2218 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-30Completed
S1313, A Phase IB/II Randomized Study of Modified FOLFIRINOX + Pegylated Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) Versus Modified FOLFIRINOX Alone in Patients With Good Performance Status Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT01959139]Phase 1/Phase 2126 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-23Active, not recruiting
AN OPEN-LABEL, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 STUDY OF FIRST-LINE ENCORAFENIB PLUS CETUXIMAB WITH OR WITHOUT CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS STANDARD OF CARE THERAPY WITH A SAFETY LEAD-IN OF ENCORAFENIB AND CETUXIMAB PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY IN PARTICIPANTS WITH METASTATIC [NCT04607421]Phase 3815 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-21Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Once or Twice Weekly IMMU-130 (hMN-14-SN38, Antibody-Drug Conjugate) in Patients With Colorectal Cancer. [NCT01605318]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No patients are enrolled in any studies conducted under this IND)
A Trial Comparing Pre-operative Chemo-radiotherapy With Cisplatin and Fluorouracil Versus Chemotherapy With Docetaxel and Irinotecan in PET Non Responders Resectable Cancer Esophagus: a Multicenter Study [NCT01608464]Phase 2170 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to poor accrual)
A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Evaluation of the Effect of Atorvastatin on the Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan in Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving FOLFIRI [NCT01605344]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was withdrawn due to lack of patient enrollment.)
A Phase I Trial of Irinotecan, Radiation Therapy and Escalating Doses of Docetaxel With Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer [NCT00601692]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Quadruplet 1st Line Treatment of CAPOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab for mCRC, Multicenter Randomised Phase II Study (QUATTRO-II) [NCT04097444]Phase 2112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-11Recruiting
[NCT00037804]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
Randomized Phase II Study of NaliCap (Irinotecan Liposome/Capecitabine) Compared to NAPOLI (Irinotecan Liposome/5-fluorouracil/Leucovorin) in Gemcitabine-pretreated Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT04371224]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-23Recruiting
Phase IB Study to Evaluate the Safety of Selinexor (KPT-330) in Combination With Multiple Standard Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy Agents in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT02419495]Phase 1221 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Trial of Nanoliposomal CPT-11 (NL CPT-11) in Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas [NCT00734682]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Phase I Pharmacokinetic Interaction Study of Irinotecan (NSC616348) and Thalidomide (NSC66847) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00062127]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
BAY 1895344 Plus Topoisomerase-1 (Top1) Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors, Phase I Studies With Expansion Cohorts in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (SCLC), Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (PD-NEC) and Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (P [NCT04514497]Phase 196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-20Active, not recruiting
SORAFENIB (NEXAVAR®) in Combination With Irinotecan in the Second Line Treatment or More of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With K-RAS Mutation : a Multicentre Two-part Phase I/II Study. [NCT00989469]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Apatinib and Irinotecan Combination as Second-line Treatment in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Phase I Dose Escalation Study [NCT02645864]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab Versus Induction FOLFOX Followed by Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial [NCT04215731]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-27Recruiting
Phase I/IIa Study of the Novel Combination of Bendamustine With Irinotecan Followed by Etoposide/Carboplatin in Chemonaive Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00856830]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Uncontrolled, Exploratory Phase 2 Trial of Irinotecan Plus Anlotinib or Further in Combination With Penpulimab as Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (ZL-IRIAN) [NCT05229003]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-09Recruiting
An Open-label, Multi-center, ph II Platform Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of NIS793 and Other New Investigational Drug Combinations With SOC Anti-cancer Therapy for the 2L Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) [NCT04952753]Phase 2205 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-15Active, not recruiting
Optimizing and Personalising Azacitidine Combination Therapy for Treating Solid Tumours Using the Quadratic Phenotypic Optimization Platform (QPOP) and an Artificial Intelligence-based Platform (CURATE.AI) [NCT05381038]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of the Combination of Irinotecan/Cisplatin Versus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin as Second-line Treatment of Patients With Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [NCT00614965]Phase 2124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy According to EGFR Mutation Status in Patients With Unresectable Stage III NSCLC [NCT00620269]Phase 2212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-02-29Recruiting
A Randomized, Open Label Study to Compare the Effect of First-line Treatment With Avastin in Combination With Irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/Folinic Acid, and Irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/Folinic Acid Alone, on Progression-free Survival in Chinese Patients Wi [NCT00642577]Phase 3214 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Open-Label Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of PEP02 in Combination With 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Leucovorin (LV) in Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT02884128]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Phase I Study of UCN-01 in Combination With Irinotecan in Resistant Solid Tumor Malignancies (Part I) and in Triple Negative (ER-Negative, PgR-Negative, HER-2 Not-Amplified) Recurrent Breast Cancers (Part II) [NCT00031681]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study to Determine the Dose, Safety and Efficacy of NKTR-102 (PEG-Irinotecan) in Combination With Cetuximab in Patients With Solid Tumors Refractory to Standard Treatment and to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of NKTR-1 [NCT00598975]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Pharmacogenetic-Based Phase I Trial of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer [NCT00654160]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of Irinotecan in Combination With Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. [NCT01091259]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
mXELOXIRI Combined With Molecular Targeted Drug as First-line Therapy in Patients With Initially Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II, Single-arm, Prospective Clinical Study [NCT04160416]Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-01Recruiting
[NCT00967330]Phase 2182 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of cétuximab Associated With the Protocol FOLFIRINOX (LV5FU Simplified Combined With Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin) in the First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Expressing EGFR or [NCT00556413]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Phase 3 Study of Irinotecan, Folinic Acid, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) Plus Ramucirumab or Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Progressive During or Following First-Line Combination Therapy Wit [NCT01183780]Phase 31,072 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-02Completed
Adjuvant Sutent Following Chemotherapy, Radiation and Surgery For Esophageal Cancer, A Phase II Trial (ASSET) [NCT00400114]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-25Completed
An Open, Multicenter, Phase Ib/II Clinical Study of IMP4297 Capsule (JS109) Combined With Irinotecan in the Treatment of Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors [NCT05824455]Phase 1/Phase 257 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-23Recruiting
Phase 2, 2-Part, Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of CT-322 Monotherapy and Combination Therapy With Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT00562419]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-10-31Active, not recruiting
Phase IB Study of FOLFIRINOX Plus PF-04136309 in Patients With Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT01413022]Phase 144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Individualized 1st Line Chemotherapy Based on BRCA1 and RRM1 mRNA Expression Levels for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT01424709]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-12-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Nal-IRI (ONIVYDE® ) and Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma [NCT05385861]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1 and Pharmacologic Study of MM-151 in Patients With Refractory Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT01520389]Phase 1112 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan (Nal-IRI, PEP02, MM-398, Onivyde®) With 5-FU and Leucovorin in Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of Head & Neck and Esophagus After Prior Platinum-based Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy [NCT03712397]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-24Completed
A Phase I Study of Irinotecan in Combination With Fixed Dose Celecoxib in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00084721]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Triapine® in Combination With Irinotecan in Refractory Tumors [NCT00084877]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Taxotere, Cisplatin, and Irinotecan in Advanced Esophageal and Gastric Cancer [NCT00165464]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
A Trial of Irinotecan (NSC# 616348) Plus Vincristine in Children With Solid Tumors [NCT00006095]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-07-31Completed
A Phase Ib Study Combining Irinotecan With AZD1775, a Selective Wee 1 Inhibitor, in RAS (KRAS or NRAS) or BRAF Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Who Have Progressed on First Line Therapy [NCT02906059]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Irinotecan Liposome in Combination With Oxaliplatin and 5-FU/LV in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT04796948]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-08Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase III Intergroup Trial in Resected Stage 2 (Dukes B) Colon Cancer: 6-Month Infusional 5FU-CPT11 (+/- Folinic Acid) Versus Observation - Determination of Biologic Predictive and Response Factors [NCT00091312]Phase 31,976 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Sandostatin LAR Depot for the Prevention of Irinotecan-Induced Diarrhea in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00006269]Phase 389 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-12-31Terminated
A Phase I/II Study of TS-1, Irinotecan and Cisplatin for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic NSLC [NCT00874328]Phase 1/Phase 274 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-10-31Recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of MEHD7945A + FOLFIRI Versus Cetuximab + FOLFIRI in Second Line in Patients With KRAS Wildtype Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01652482]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Multi-center, Open-label, Non-randomized, Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) in Pediatric Subjects With Solid Malignant Tumors That Are Recurrent or Refractory to Standard Therapy [NCT02085148]Phase 162 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-11Active, not recruiting
Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX-6 as First-line Treatment for Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Randomised, Open-label, Phase 3 Trial [NCT04230187]Phase 3528 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-01Recruiting
A Pilot Trial of Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Combined With the Anti-Angiogenesis Agent Tetrathiomolybdate in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma (UMCC 0075) [NCT00176774]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Phase 2 Study to Improve Tolerance of Chemotherapy Involving Cetuximab and Multidrug FOLFIRI, With Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacogenetic Studies, in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00559741]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Phase Ib Study of Gevokizumab in Combination With Standard of Care Anti-cancer Therapies in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Gastroesophageal Cancer and Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT03798626]Phase 1167 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-22Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Irinotecan Liposome (Nal-IRI), Fluorouracil and Rucaparib in the Treatment of Select Gastrointestinal Metastatic Malignancies Followed by a Phase Ib of First and Second Line Treatment of Both Unselected and Selected (for BRCA 1/2 and PALB [NCT03337087]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-02Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Multi-Institutional Efficacy and Safety Study of Chemotherapy With Selective Internal Radiation Treatment Using Y-90 Microspheres (CHEMO-SIRT) in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis [NCT00408551]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-11-30Recruiting
Phase I / II Study of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Combined With l-Leucovorin (l-LV) and 5-FU in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer:Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group:HGCSG0001 [NCT00209625]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants Interventional2000-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan (Camptosar) in Patients With Advanced Sarcomas [NCT00509860]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of Oral S-1 Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group HGCSG0303 [NCT00209664]Phase 240 participants Interventional2004-01-31Suspended
Avastin in Combination With Radiation and Temozolomide, Followed by Avastin, Temozolomide and Irinotecan for Glioblastoma Multiformes and Gliosarcomas [NCT00597402]Phase 2125 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Weekly Cisplatin/Irinotecan and Radiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: Phase II Trial [NCT00213486]Phase 243 participants Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Phase I Study of Olaparib and Temozolomide in Adult Patients With Recurrent/Metastatic Ewing's Sarcoma or Rhabdomyosarcoma Following Failure of Prior Chemotherapy [NCT01858168]Phase 193 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-31Recruiting
Randomized Phase 2 Study Comparing Pathological Responses on Colorectal Cancer Metastases After Preoperative Treatment Combining Bevacizumab With FOLFOX or FOLFIRI [NCT01858649]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Randomised Phase 2 Study Comparing Pathological Responses Observed on Colorectal Cancer Metastases Resected After Preoperative Treatment Combining Cetuximab With FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in RAS and B-RAF WT Tumors [NCT01858662]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Terminated(stopped due to due to poor recrutment)
GAMBIT Trial: A Randomized,Non-comparative, Open-label Clinical Trial Evaluating Cisplatin Plus Irinotecan in the Treatment of Gallbladder or Biliary Tract Cancer [NCT01859728]Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Recruiting
AZD8931, an Inhibitor of EGFR, ERBB2 and ERBB3 Signalling, in Combination With FOLFIRI: a Phase I/II Study to Determine the Importance of Schedule and Activity in Colorectal Cancer [NCT01862003]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Potentially Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-type KRAS and BRAF: Alternating Chemotherapy Plus Cetuximab - A Randomised Phase II Trial [NCT01867697]Phase 2173 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Phase III Study of Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Regimen (FOLFIRI) Versus Irinotecan Monodrug as Second-line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT02935764]Phase 3164 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Not yet recruiting
Multi-agent Low Dose Chemotherapy (Gemcitabine, Nab-paclitaxel, Capecitabine, Cisplatin, Irinotecan) Followed by Maintenance Olaparib and Pembrolizumab in Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. [NCT04753879]Phase 238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-29Recruiting
Phase II Study Evaluating the Association of Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy of the Type Modified FOLFIRI 3 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma [NCT00544011]Phase 247 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-04-30Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on the Safety and Efficacy of Polyvinyl Alcohol Sodium Acrylate Embolization Microspheres for Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases [NCT06021015]72 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-10Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Preoperative Capecitabine Plus Irinotecan Followed by Combined Modality Capecitabine and Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Hoosier Oncology Group GI03-53 [NCT00216086]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Funding withdrawn)
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Abemaciclib in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide (Part A) and Abemaciclib in Combination With Temozolomide (Part B) in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Solid Tumors and Abemaciclib in Combination [NCT04238819]Phase 1/Phase 2117 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-09Recruiting
Phase 1 Dose-escalating Study of MM-398 (Irinotecan Sucrosofate Liposome Injection) Plus Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Solid Tumors [NCT02013336]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
Phase I Study of the Combination of Irinotecan and MLN8237 in Advanced Solid Tumors With Emphasis on Colorectal Cancer [NCT01923337]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Phase II, Single Arm, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of S-1, Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin (SIRIOX) in Treating Patients With Advanced Inoperable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03403101]Phase 265 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
Phase I Trial of BMN 673 and Selected Cytotoxics in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT02049593]Phase 144 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-12Completed
Avastin in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan for Unresectable or Multifocal Glioblastoma Multiformes and Gliosarcomas [NCT00979017]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Raltitrexed-based Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Retreated Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT03126071]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-15Recruiting
Phase IB/Randomized Phase II Study of Folfirinox Plus AMG-479 (Ganitumab) or Placebo in Patients With Previously Untreated, Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT01473303]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to CALGB 81003 closed about a week after it was activated because of withdrawal of support. No patients were registered on this study.)
Multicenter Phase II Study of Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer [NCT01494363]Phase 253 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-10-31Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan/Cisplatin Plus Simvastatin in Chemo-naive Patients With Extensive Disease-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00452634]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Cisplatin for Metastatic or Unresectable High Grade Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract [NCT00353015]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Study of Irinotecan Plus 5-fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin and Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI+Avastin) Versus Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine and Bevacizumab (XELIRI+Avastin) as 1st Line Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00469443]Phase 3330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Phase I Open-label, Multi-center, Dose-escalation and Safety Expansion Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinectics of AZD7762 Administered as a Single Intravenous Agent and in Combination With Weekly Standard Dose of Irinotecan in Patien [NCT00473616]Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Termination of the study was made after a full review of program data and assessment of the current risk-benefit profile.)
Phase II Study of Carboplatin, Irinotecan, and Thalidomide in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00025285]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-01Completed
A Phase II Trial With Cetuximab, Bevacizumab and Irinotecan for Patients With Malignant Glioblastomas and Progression After Radiation Therapy and Temozolamide [NCT00463073]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
An Open-label, Multicenter Phase 1 Study Investigating the Combination of RAD001, Cetuximab and Irinotecan as Second-line Therapy After FOLFOX (or XELOX) Plus Bevacizumab (if Given as Part of Local Standard Practice) in Patient With Metastatic Colorectal [NCT00478634]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Eribulin in Combination With Oral Irinotecan for Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT02596503]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-21Completed
Phase II Study of S-1 Combined With Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00506571]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-07-31Recruiting
An Open Label, Multi-cohort, Multicenter Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Envofolimab in Combination With BD0801 Injection With/Without Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT05148195]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-22Recruiting
An Open-label, Randomised, Multicentre, Phase III Study of Irinotecan Liposome Injection, Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil/Leucovorin Versus Nab-paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects Who Have Not Previously Received Chemotherapy for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT04083235]Phase 3770 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-11Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Monotherapy Versus Irinotecan, Leucovorin and 5-FU (ILF) Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer Failing Prior Chemotherapy [NCT00509964]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Recruiting
Phase I Study of Preoperative Chemo/Radiation (Concurrent Irinotecan/Cisplatin/RT) Followed by Surgery in Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC-LS) [NCT00062322]Phase 10 participants Interventional2003-02-28Completed
A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of S-1 Combined With Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin in Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancy [NCT00506207]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Clinical Study for the Evaluation of Genetic Polymorphisms of Drug Transporters and Orphan Nuclear Receptors on the Pharmacokinetics and Treatment Effects of Irinotecan in Patients With Colorectal and Gastric Cancer [NCT00507143]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-08-31Recruiting
A Phase II Study of S-1 Combined With Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin in Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma [NCT00512681]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Pilot Study of the Biologic Efficacy and Safety of the Addition of Celecoxib to a Program of Induction Chemotherapy and Neo-Adjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer [NCT00520091]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Phase I / Randomized Phase II Study of Second Line Therapy With Irinotecan and Cetuximab With or Without RAD001, an Oral mTOR Inhibitor for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Hoosier Oncology Group GI05-102 [NCT00522665]Phase 1/Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Phase I Study of Sunitinib With FOLFIRI (Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin) for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancers [NCT00524186]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to PI left institute)
Clinical Analysis of Naxitamab (hu3F8) in the Treatment of Pediatric High Risk or Refractory/ Relapsed Neuroblastoma [NCT06013618]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-19Recruiting
Phase II Randomized Study Comparing FOLFIRINOX + Panitumumab Versus mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Selected by RAS and B-RAF Status From Circulating DNA Analysis [NCT02980510]Phase 2219 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Trial of Irinotecan, Temozolomide and Bevacizumab in Combination With Existing High Dose Alkylator Based Chemotherapy for Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Patients With Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor [NCT01189643]Early Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy in Patients Who Have Resectable Esophageal Cancer and Are Treated With Neoadjuvant Cisplatin, Irinotecan (CPT-11) ZD1839 (IRESSA), and Radiotherapy Followed by Surgical Resection [NCT00290719]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Terminated(stopped due to low enrollment)
Dose-Dense and Dose-Intense Alternating Irinotecan/Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin/Capecitabine: Phase I in Solid Tumors and Phase II With Bevacizumab a First-Line Therapy of Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00296062]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Trial did not move to Phase II portion due to poor tolerance of treatment)
A Phase II Pilot Study of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine Alternating With Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Ewing's Sarcoma [NCT01313884]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Study did not reach primary objective; study did not accrue enough patients.)
"Frontline Chemotherapy Reinforced for Cancers of the Colon and Rectum With Potentially Resectable Hepatic and/or Pulmonary Metastases: Association of FOLFIRI and ERBITUX" [NCT00557102]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Phase I Study of Interperitoneal Chenotherapy in Patients With Gastric Adenocarainoma With Peritoneal Seeding [NCT00539877]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Phase II, Multicenter Study Evaluating G-CSF as Primary Prophylaxis for Neutropenia Associated With First-line Chemotherapy Regimen FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Are Homozygous for UGT1A1*28 Polymorphism, the Pr [NCT00541125]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Multicenter, Open-label Clinical Study of PD-L1/CTLA4 BsAb Combined With Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT04324307]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-26Recruiting
Phase 4 Study to Characterize and Evaluate Markers of Chemoresistance in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00559676]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Temozolomide With Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide, Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab (NSC# 704865) for Recurrent/Refractory Medulloblastoma/CNS PNET of Childhood, a COG Randomized Phase II Screening Trial [NCT01217437]Phase 2108 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-22Completed
Irinotecan and Vincristine With 131I-MIBG Therapy for Resistant/Relapsed High-Risk Neuroblastoma, A Phase I Study [NCT00509353]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Randomized Phase II Trial Of Neoadjuvant Combined Modality Therapy For Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT00081289]Phase 2146 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Phase 1/2a Dose-escalation Study of JX 594 Administered by Multiple Intravenous (IV) Infusions Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic, Refractory Colorectal Carcinoma. [NCT01394939]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Phase II Study of Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan and Carboplatin for Recurrent Malignant Glioma Patients [NCT00953121]Phase 2104 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Clinical Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI With Bevacizumab As First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02246049]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Irinotecan Plus S1 Versus S1 in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESWN 01 Trial): a Phase 3, Prospective,Multicenter, Randomised Study [NCT02319187]Phase 3240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-31Recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Chemotherapy With Folfirinox to Gemcitabine in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma [NCT02539537]Phase 3171 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-23Active, not recruiting
Preoperative Folfirinox for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma - A Phase II Study [NCT02345460]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Competing studies)
A Phase II Study of CPT-11 in Patients With Advanced Gallbladder or Bile Duct Tumors [NCT00003276]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan (CPT-11) and Docetaxel (Taxotere) in Patients With Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00003900]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-10-31Completed
Treatment of Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas in Patients Ages Greater Than or Equal to 3 and Less Than or Equal to 21 Years With a Phase II Irinotecan Window Followed by Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide [NCT00004068]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFr) Antibody Cetuximab in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00005076]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-10-31Completed
A Phase III Study of Chemotherapy With or Without Algenpantucel-L (HyperAcute®-Pancreas) Immunotherapy in Subjects With Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01836432]Phase 3302 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Company decision)
Genotype-driven Phase I Study of Irinotecan Administered in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer [NCT01474187]Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Recruiting
a Prospective Study on the Efficacy and Safety Using Sequential Therapy of Irinotecan Combined With Cisplatin (IP)and Octretide Lar in the First Line Treatment of Metastatic or Inoperable Gastrointestinal Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: th [NCT01480986]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Phase 1b Clinical Trial of LDE225 in Combination With Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) in Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, With an Expansion Cohort at the Recommended Phase 2 [NCT01485744]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Phase II Study Of 5FU-Irinotecan-Cisplatin As First-Line Treatment In Patients With Metastatic Carcinoma Of The Esophagus [NCT00075738]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-10-31Active, not recruiting
Irinotecan Combined With Infusional 5-FU/Folinic Acid or Capecitabine and the Role of Celecoxib in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00064181]Phase 386 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
A Randomised, Non-Comparative, Multicentre, Phase II, Parallel-Group Trial Of ZD1839 (Iressa™) In Combination With 5 Fluorouracil, Leucovorin And Cpt-11 (Irinotecan) In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00233623]Phase 2190 participants Interventional2004-07-31Withdrawn
A Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan, or in Combination With Cetuximab Alone, in Irinotecan-Refractory Colorectal Cancer [NCT00077298]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Imatinib Mesylate Maintenance Therapy in Patients With C-Kit (+) Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00248482]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A Randomized Phase II-study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Capecitabine Plus Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab Compared to Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Plus Cetuximab in First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. [NCT00254137]Phase 292 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Phase II Study of Weekly Irinotecan and Carboplatin in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00104793]Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of Celecoxib, Capecitabine, and Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00258232]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Induction Cisplatin/Irinotecan Followed By Combination Carboplatin, Etoposide And Chest Radiotherapy In Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Study [NCT00072527]Phase 278 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
A Phase I And Pharmacogenetic Study Of CPT-11, Oxaliplatin, And Capecitabine In Patients With Solid Tumors [NCT00074321]Phase 184 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Study of First-Line Therapy Comprising Leucovorin Calcium, Fluorouracil, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in Patients With Progressive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Duodenal-Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors [NCT00416767]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Concurrent Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer With Prior Anthracycline and/or Taxane-Containing Therapy [NCT00275041]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Phase II Trial of Weekly Irinotecan and Docetaxel in Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00079118]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Flavopiridol in Combination With Gemcitabine and Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Cancer [NCT00079352]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Phase 1/1b Dose Escalation Study Evaluating BSI-201 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Irinotecan in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00298675]Phase 159 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Phase 2 Study of Irinotecan Liposome Injection in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Who Have Progressed After Platinum-based First-line Therapy [NCT04727853]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Not yet recruiting
Phase II Trial Of Irinotecan + 5-Fluorouracil + Leucovorin + Oxaliplatin As First-Line Treatment For Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00080951]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Non-Randomized Phase II Study of Sequential Irinotecan (CPT-11) And Flavopiridol In Patients With Advanced Hepatoma [NCT00087282]Phase 20 participants Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Randomized Study of Second-Line Therapy Comprising Irinotecan With or Without Capecitabine in Patients Aged At Least 75 Years With Colorectal Cancer [NCT00303745]Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan, Carboplatin, Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00294931]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Randomized Pilot Study of the Activation of the Hemostatic Pathway by FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab With or Without Dalteparin in First Line Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00323011]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Terminated(stopped due to drug not available)
A Phase II Study of 5-FU, Irinotecan, Bevacizumab and Hydroxychloroquine in Drug-Tolerant Persister (DTP)-Selected Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT05843188]Phase 2155 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-09Recruiting
Phase I Dose Escalation and Pharmacokinetics Clinical Trial of Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome in Children With Relapsed and Refractory Lymphoma and Solid Tumors [NCT05620862]Phase 168 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-25Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study Comparing 5FU/LV+Nal-IRI, Gemcitabine+Nab-paclitaxel or a Sequential Regimen of 2 Months 5FU/LV+Nal-IRI Followed by Two Months of Gemcitabine+Nab-paclitaxel, in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03693677]Phase 2288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-16Recruiting
Systemic Oxaliplatin or Intra-arterial Chemotherapy Combined With LV5FU2 +/- Irinotecan and an Target Therapy in First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Restricted to the Liver [NCT02885753]Phase 3348 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Carcinoma of the Head and Neck [NCT00639769]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
A Phase 3 Trial of Balstilimab Versus Investigator Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Cervical Cancer After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (BRAVA) [NCT04943627]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-08-02Withdrawn(stopped due to Strategic Business Decision)
A Pilot Study of Liposomal Irinotecan Plus 5-FU / LV Combined With Paricalcitol in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Progressed on Gemcitabine-based Therapy [NCT03883919]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-11Completed
A Pilot Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Discontinuation and Reintroduction in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00320320]Phase 272 participants Interventional2005-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Liposome Combined With Irinotecan (AI Regimen) Versus VIT Regimen in the Treatment of First Relapsed and Refractory Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma: a Prospective, Open-label, Randomized Controlled, Phase II Clinical Study [NCT05457829]Phase 288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin (Rh-TPO) and Recombinant Human Interleukin-11 (rhIL-11) for Recurrent Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Patients With Thrombocytopenia [NCT03823079]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase Ⅱ Study Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LY01610(Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome Injection) in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT04381910]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-21Active, not recruiting
PhaseⅠStudy of Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome Injection (LY01610) About the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics (PK)and Preliminary Efficacy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT04088604]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-15Completed
A Multi-Center Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Trial of Vigil (Bi-shRNAfurin and GMCSF Augmented Autologous Tumor Cell Immunotherapy) in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide as a Second-Line Regimen for Ewing's Sarcoma [NCT03495921]Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-21Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual and as a result, a strategic business decision was made to terminate enrollment.)
A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Non-Comparative Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Alone or in Combination With Irinotecan for Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme in First or Second Relapse [NCT00345163]Phase 2167 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Concurrent CPT-11/Cisplatin and Celecoxib With Radiation Therapy for Patients With Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [NCT00346801]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
A Phase I Study Of Oral Irinotecan, Temozolomide, Cefixime In Children With Recurrent/Resistant High-Risk Neuroblastoma [NCT00093353]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Pilot Study to Evaluate Novel Agents (Temozolomide and Cixutumumab [IMC-A12, Anti-IGF-IR Monoclonal Antibody NSC # 742460]) in Combination With Intensive Multi-agent Interval Compressed Therapy for Patients With High-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma [NCT01055314]Phase 2175 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluating FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab Versus FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab in First Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. [NCT00433927]Phase 3568 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study Of Radiation Therapy Plus Low Dose Temozolomide Followed By Temozolomide Plus Irinotecan For Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT00099125]Phase 2170 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Phase I Study of Weekly Irinotecan Combined With Amrubicin in Previously Treated Small-Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00132054]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Oxaliplatin (NSC# 266046, IND #57004) and Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors and Lymphomas [NCT00101270]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Neuroblastoma Protocol 2005: Therapy for Children With Advanced Stage High-Risk Neuroblastoma [NCT00135135]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Phase I Study of ZD6474, Cetuximab, and Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00436072]Phase 146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Protocole Evaluant Chez Des Patients Porteurs de Cancers Colorectaux Metastatiques l'Interet Des Determinants Genotypiques Pour l'Optimisation de l'Efficacite et de la Tolerance de la Chimiotherapie Par Irinotecan et 5-fluorouracile [NCT00138060]Phase 471 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of Weekly Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Nad Malignant Pleural Effusion [NCT00465907]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
Randomized Phase III Study With Irinotecan+Best Supportive Care Versus Only Best Supportive Care as Second Line Therapy for Metastatic Gastric Cancer [NCT00144378]Phase 344 participants Interventional2002-10-31Completed
Randomized, Phase III Trial Comparing Etoposide/Cisplatin (EP) With Irinotecan/Cisplatin (IP) in Patients With Previously Untreated, Extensive Disease (ED) Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) [NCT00349492]Phase 3372 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Selenomethionine With Fixed Dose Irinotecan in Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00112892]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin Versus the Combination of 5-FU/LV and Oxaliplatin, as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer [NCT00447967]Phase 2110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Carboplatin and Irinotecan Concomitantly With Radiation Therapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy With Docetaxel for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (GIA 12177). [NCT00449020]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of Irinotecan Liposome Injection in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT04728035]Phase 1136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-30Not yet recruiting
Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (NSC# 704865) for Untreated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Study [NCT00118235]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Phase Ib, Dose-Escalation Study of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of PRO95780 in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan Chemotherapy or the FOLFIRI Regimen With Bevacizumab in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00497497]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Phase 1, Open Label Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of AZD2171 and Selected Chemotherapy Regimens When Given in Combination to Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00502567]Phase 1104 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Phase I/II Clinical, Pharmacological, and Biological Study of BAY 43-9006 in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00134069]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, CPT-11, Celecoxib (PCC), Concurrent Radiation Therapy, and Surgery for Resectable Esophageal Cancer [NCT00137852]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy of Combined Pre-operative Chemo (CPT11, Cisplatin), Radiotherapy (External Beam, Brachytherapy), Plus Surgery for Potentially Resectable Thoracic Esophageal Cancer [NCT00160875]Phase 2/Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase Ⅱ Study of Pre-Operative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Capecitabine Plus Irinotecan in Resectable Rectal Cancer. [NCT00506623]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase Ⅲ Randomized Study of Mitomycin/Vindesine/Cisplatin Versus Irinotecan/Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel/Carboplatin With Concurrent Thoracic Radiotherapy for Unresectable Stage Ⅲ Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00144053]Phase 3450 participants Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Phase I Open Label Study to Asses the Safety and Tolerability of ZD6474 (Vandetanib)in Combination With Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as First or Second Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma. [NCT00507091]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Phase I/Ib Trial of ATR Inhibitor BAY 1895344 in Combination With FOLFIRI in GI Malignancies With a Focus on Metastatic Colorectal and Gastric/Gastroesophageal Cancers [NCT04535401]Phase 190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-13Active, not recruiting
mFOLFOXIRI Versus mFOLFOX6 as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients After Preoperative Treatment With Oxaliplatin (FANTASTIC): a Multicenter, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04338191]Phase 3638 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-01Recruiting
Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Carboplatin in Metastatic or Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00387660]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
Proof of Concept Study of ctDNA Guided Change in Treatment for Refractory Minimal Residual Disease in Colon Adenocarcinomas [NCT04920032]Phase 122 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-26Recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Open-Label Study of Single Agent Pembrolizumab vs Physicians' Choice of Single Agent Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Irinotecan in Subjects With Advanced/Metastatic Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus That Have Pro [NCT02564263]Phase 3628 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-01Completed
A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan and AZD2171 in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Progression on First-Line Oxaliplatin, Fluoropyrimidine, and Bevacizumab [NCT00588900]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Terminated
Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Carboplatin, and Sunitinib in the First Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00695292]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Pilot Phase II Trial Of Irinotecan Plus Carboplatin, And Irinotecan Maintenance Therapy (High-Risk Patients Only), Integrated Into The Upfront Therapy Of Newly Diagnosed Patients With Intermediate - And High-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma [NCT00077285]Phase 265 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase III Study Comparing Etoposide and Cisplatin (EP) With Irinotecan and Cisplatin (IP) Following EP Plus Concurrent Accelerated Hyperfractionated Thoracic Irradiation (EP/TRT) for Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer : JCOG0202-MF [NCT00144989]Phase 3281 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
Feasibility Study for Multicenter Randomized Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial of Cisplatin + Irinotecan Therapy and Cisplatin + Irinotecan + Krestin Therapy for Extensive-Stage Disease (ED) Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00546130]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-11-30Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Capecitabine in Combination With Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) in Adult Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00215982]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study of MK-0646 in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00925015]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-17Completed
[NCT00463203]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bevacizumab, Irinotecan and Capecitabine in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00483834]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Prospective Evaluation of the Effect of Curcumin on Dose-limiting Toxicity and Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan in Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT01859858]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of Irinotecan in Combination With Capecitabine in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00506168]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Terminated(stopped due to The study drugs are not covered anymore by insurance.)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan Guided by UGT1A1 Status in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Real-Word Multi-center Study [NCT05148767]Phase 4606 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Recruiting
Oxaliplatin-CPT-11-5-FU-Leucovarin + Bevacizumab and Cetuximab (OCFL-BC) as a Combination Regimen for Systemic Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma With Potentially Resectable Liver and/or Lung Metastases. A Phase II Study [NCT00513266]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-06-30Active, not recruiting
Temozolomide and Irinotecan Consolidation in Patients With MGMT Silenced, Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer With Persistence of Minimal Residual Disease in Liquid Biopsy After Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy: the ERASE-TMZ Study [NCT05031975]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-02Recruiting
Irinotecan Plus Raltitrexed as Second-line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients: An Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter Phase II Study [NCT03053167]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial Investigating Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab With or Without Anti-Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Receptor Monoclonal Antibody (IMC-A12) for the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic K-Ras Wild Type Carcinoma of the Colon or R [NCT00845039]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated early 22Feb2010 with only 4 participants due to business reasons.)
Influence of Individual Dosage Selection of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Based on UGT1A1 Genotype on Clinical Outcomes and Pharmacokinetics in Chinese Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01523431]Phase 2/Phase 3583 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-08Completed
A Novel Phase I/IIa Open Label Study of IMM 101 in Combination With Selected Standard of Care (SOC) Regimens in Patients With Metastatic Cancer or Unresectable Cancer at Study Entry [NCT03009058]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-24Terminated(stopped due to Commercial reasons)
A Phase 1 Study of MM-121 in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Cancers [NCT01451632]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, and Capecitabine in Advanced Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma [NCT00084617]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Alternating Xeliri and Xelox as First-line Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01531595]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-02-29Recruiting
Observational Study of the Impact of Circulating T Regulatory Cells (Tregs) on Clinical Outcome of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (MCRC) Patients Treated With Standard Fluorouracil/Irinotecan/Bevacizumab First Line Therapy [NCT01533740]31 participants (Actual)Observational2012-03-31Completed
Irinotecan, Vincristine, Etoposide, Carboplatin, and Cyclophosphamide for Refractory or Relapsed Brain Tumor in Children and Adolescents [NCT01535183]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Recruiting
CMAB009 Plus Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan-only as Second-line Treatment After Fluoropyrimidine and Oxaliplatin Failure in KRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Phase II/III Trial [NCT01550055]Phase 2/Phase 3512 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial of Bevacizumab Combined With Capecitabine and Either Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00314353]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was closed early due to low enrollment and new information regarding the benefit of the study regimen.)
A Phase Ib/II Study of AK112 and AK119 in Combination With or Without Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Microsatellite Stabilized (pMMR/MSS) Colorectal Cancer [NCT05846867]Phase 1/Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-10Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00401128]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
An Open-Label, Multi-Center Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Irinotecan in Combination With Infusional 5-FU, Leucovorin (Folfiri) Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Unresectable Hepatic-Only Metastases of Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00106054]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Terminated(stopped due to After 1 year only 2 subjects enrolled and treated thus no meaningful efficacy analyses could be performed.)
Phase I Study to Evaluate the Combination Chemotherapy Regimen of Oxaliplatin Plus Irinotecan in Previously Treated Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer [NCT00003427]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-04-30Completed
Phase I Treatment of Adults With Recurrent Supratentorial High Grade Glioma With Gliadel Wafers Plus Irinotecan (CPT-11) [NCT00003463]Phase 10 participants Interventional1998-07-31Completed
An Open-Labeled, Non-Randomized Phase I Study Of Flavopiridol Administered With Irinotecan (CPT-11) In Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00006485]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-09-30Completed
"A Phase II Up-Front Window Study of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Followed by Multimodal, Multiagent, Therapy for Selected Children and Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed Stage 4/Clinical Group IV Rhabdomyosarcoma: An IRS-V Study" [NCT00003955]Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan: Use and Sequencing: A Randomized Trial to Assess the Role of Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin in Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00008060]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-05-31Completed
An Open-Labeled Non-Randomized Phase I Study of 17-N-allylamino-17-demethoxy Geldanamycin (17AAG) Administered With Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00119236]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Phase I & Pharmacologic Trial Of Sequential Irinotecan As A 24-Hour IV Infusion, Leucovorin, & Flurouracil As A 48-Hour IV Infusion In Adult Cancer Patients [NCT00020488]Phase 10 participants Interventional2001-02-28Completed
A Phase II Study Of Irinotecan (Camptosar) And Paclitaxel (Taxol) In Patients With Adenocarcinoma Of The Upper Gastrointestinal Tract [NCT00020761]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-04-30Completed
Pilot Study of an Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Antibody, Cetuximab, in Combination With Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin, and in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage IV Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00020917]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Phase I Study of Flavopiridol in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00021073]Phase 190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-05-31Completed
Phase II Trial Of Induction Gemcitabine/CPT-11 Followed By Twice-Weekly Infusion Gemcitabine And Concurrent External Beam Radiation For The Treatment Of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00025168]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-01Completed
A Groupwide Randomized Phase II Window Study of Two Different Schedules of Irinotecan in Combination With Vincristine And Pilot Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Tirapazamine Combined With Multiagent Chemotherapy for First Relapse or Progressive Diseas [NCT00025363]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Gemcitabine Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Esophageal Cancer, Phase II [NCT00012363]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Phase II Trial Of Gemcitabine (NSC-613327) And Irinotecan (NSC-616348) In Patients With Untreated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) [NCT00030433]Phase 285 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Phase II Single-Arm Trial Of CPT-11 (Irinotecan HC1; Camptosar Injection)/Cisplatin In Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer [NCT00030862]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-10-31Completed
Tailored Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Based on Genetic Markers [NCT00396487]Phase 31 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Only one patient included as per Feb. 4, 2008.)
Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Of Celecoxib Vs Placebo For The Prevention Of Diarrhea Associated With CPT-11/5fu/LV Chemotherapy In Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00037180]Phase 2212 participants Interventional2002-04-30Terminated
Time Finding Study of Chronomodulated Irinotecan, 5 Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatin as First or Second Chemotherapy Line Against Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00039208]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-02-28Completed
An Open-Labeled, Non-Randomized Phase I Study of Alvocidib (Flavopiridol) Administered With Irinotecan (CPT-11) and Fluorouracil/Leucovorin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00042874]Phase 177 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Escalating Doses of CPT-11 and 5fluorouracil (5FU) Plus PN401 With a Fixed Dose of Leucovorin in Patients With Solid Tumor Malignancies. [NCT00044785]Phase 124 participants Interventional2002-08-31Terminated
A Phase I Study of Imatinib (Gleevec) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00045604]Phase 10 participants Interventional2002-07-31Completed
The Pharmacokinetic and Safety Profile of UCN-01 in Combination With Irinotecan in Solid Tumors (Primarily Lung, Ovarian and GI Cancers) [NCT00047242]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
An Open-label Study of the Effect of Intermittent Xeloda in Combination With Irinotecan on Treatment Response in Patients With Advanced and/or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00048139]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Single-dummy, Parallel-controlled, Multicentre, Phase III Clinical Study of Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome in Combination With 5-FU/LV as Second-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer After Treat [NCT05074589]Phase 3298 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-25Completed
A Phase II Trial Of IRESSA (NSC 715055, IND 61187) In Combination With 5-FU/LV/ CPT-11 In Patients With Advanced Or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer [NCT00052585]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
S0025: Phase II Trial Of Irinotecan (CAMPTOSAR) For Patients With Platinum And Taxane Refractory Ovarian, Peritoneal Or Fallopian Tube Cancer [NCT00053833]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Terminated(stopped due to lack of accrual)
Pediatric Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Irinotecan [NCT00062842]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-09-09Completed
Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Three Chemotherapies: [Irinotecan + Oxaliplatin (Irinox)], [Irinotecan + LV5FU2] and [Oxaliplatin + LV5FU2] as First Intention Treatment in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00066274]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-07-23Completed
Phase II Study of Irinotecan (CPT 11) and Cisplatin (CDDP) in Metastatic or Locally Advanced Penile Carcinoma [NCT00066391]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Phase II Study of 5FU/Folinic Acid and Irinotecan as Second or Third Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic, Unresectable, Colorectal Cancer [NCT00075595]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Trial Of Irinotecan /5-FU/ Leucovorin Or Oxaliplatin /5-FU / Leucovorin With And Without Cetuximab (C225) For Patients With Untreated Metastatic Adenocarcinoma Of The Colon or Rectum [NCT00077233]Phase 3238 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating The Activity And Tolerability Of Three Different Combinations Of Docetaxel (Taxotere) And Irinotecan (Campto) As Second Line Therapy For Recurrent Or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLS) [NCT00139711]Phase 2138 participants Interventional2003-03-31Completed
A Multi-centre, Randomised, Parallel Group, Open-label, Phase II, Single-stage Selection Trial of Liposomal Irinotecan (Nal-IRI) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid or Docetaxel as Second-line Therapy in Patients With Progressive Poorly Differentiated [NCT03837977]Phase 2102 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-13Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Intravenous Irinotecan Using Selective Gastrointestinal Decontamination for Prevention of Diarrhea in Relapsed or Refractory Pediatric Solid Tumors [NCT00143533]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Regorafenib Combined With Irinotecan Drug-Eluting Beads as Third-line Treatment for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: a Multicentre, Randomised Phase 3 Trial (RIDER) [NCT05794971]Phase 3126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-10Recruiting
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Arm Study of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Versus the Combination of Oxaliplatin + Irinotecan (CPT-11) as Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00012389]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-12-31Completed
INST Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Irinotecan in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma. [NCT00276003]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Phase II Study in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated With Oxaliplatin (OXAL) or a Combination of Irinotecan (CPT-11) and OXAL [NCT00016952]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Epirubicin in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Cancer [NCT00020748]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-08-31Completed
Phase I Trial of Radical Thoracic Radiation, Weekly CPT-11 (Irinotecan) and Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma [NCT00022308]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-01-31Completed
A Randomized Phase I/III Study Of Systematic Chemotherapy With Or Without Hepatic Chemoembolization For Liver-Dominant Metastatic Adenocarcinoma Of The Colon And Rectum [NCT00023868]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-11-01Terminated(stopped due to redesign)
5-Flourouracil Preceded by Irinotecan In Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: A Pilot Study [NCT00024141]Phase 10 participants Interventional2001-05-31Completed
A Phase I Study Of ZD1839 (Iressa) In Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, And 5-Fluorouracil In Previously Untreated, Stage IV Colorectal Cancer [NCT00026364]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Pilot And Phase II Trial Of Irinotecan And Radiation Followed By Irinotecan And BCNU In Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients [NCT00027612]Phase 1/Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study Of Epothilone Analog BMS-247550 In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated With A Fluoropyrimidine And Irinotecan [NCT00033306]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-02-28Terminated
Phase II Study of Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Children and Adolescents With High Risk Ewing's Sarcoma [NCT00276692]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
Pilot Trial of an Implantable Microdevice for In Vivo Drug Sensitivity Testing in Patients With Sarcomas [NCT04199026]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Study of Preoperative Systemic Chemotherapy (Modified FOLFIRINOX) Followed by Radiation Therapy for Patients With High Risk Resectable and Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas [NCT01560949]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-14Completed
A Phase II Study Of Thalidomide And CPT-11 (IRINOTECAN) Following Radiotherapy For Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT00039468]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Completed
A Phase III Prospective Random Assignment Trial of Regional and Systemic Chemotherapy With or Without Initial Isolated Hepatic Perfusion for Patients With Metastatic Unresectable Colorectal Cancers of the Liver [NCT00020501]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-03-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Multicenter, International Study Comparing The Combination Of SU5416/Irinotecan/5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Versus Irinotecan/Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Alone As First-Line Therapy Of Patient With Previously Untreated Metast [NCT00021281]Phase 30 participants Interventional2000-12-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study Of Carboplatin And Irinotecan In Patients 1-21 Years Of Age With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00024284]Phase 10 participants Interventional2001-06-30Completed
A Phase I Study Of STI 571 (Gleevec) In Combination With Cisplatin/Irinotecan In Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00052494]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Clinical Pharmacology In The Elderly: Prospective Evaluation Of The Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacogenetics And Pharmacodynamics Of CPT-11 And Aging [NCT00026195]Phase 1140 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-09-30Completed
Escalating Irinotecan (CPT-11) Administered 24 Hours Prior To Gemcitabine In Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00054288]Phase 10 participants Interventional2001-08-31Completed
Multicenter Phase III Open Label Randomized Trial Comparing CPT-11 In Combination With A 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen To The Same 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen Alone As Adjuvant Treatment Of Stage III Colon Cancer [NCT00026273]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-01-31Completed
Pilot Phase II Study of Safety and Immunogenicity of an ALVAC-CEA/B7.1 Vaccine Administered With Chemotherapy, Alone or in Combination With Tetanus Toxoid, as Compared to Chemotherapy Alone, in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma [NCT00027833]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-12-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Randomized Study of First-Line Therapy Comprising Bevacizumab and Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Leucovorin Calcium, and Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) Versus Bevacizumab and Irinotecan Hydrochloride and Capecitabine (XELIRI) in Patients With Unresectable Met [NCT00423696]Phase 2145 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-23Completed
A Phase II Study Of Adjuvant Intravenous Irinotecan Following Resection With Or Without Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA), Of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00030563]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-05-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial Of Capecitabine And Different Schedules Of Irinotecan As First Line Treatment For Advanced Or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00030797]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
Chemoembolisation With Irinotecan Loaded DC Bead (DEBIRI) in Combination With Cetuximab and 5FU/LV in the First Line Treatment of Patients With KRAS Wildtype Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) [NCT01631539]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to No patients enrolled)
Revised Protocol 07 to Protocol CA225006 - A Phase III Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Irinotecan and Cetuximab vs. Irinotecan as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic, EGFR-Positive Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00063141]Phase 31,302 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Phase II Trial Of Toxicity Assessment In Two Cohorts Of Patients (Resection Alone Or Ablation With Or Without Resection Of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer) Treated With Adjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion (HAI) FUDR Plus Systemic CPT-11 [NCT00063960]Phase 294 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
A Phase II Feasibility Translational Research Trial of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Concomitant Chemoradiation in Patients With Clinical T4 Rectal Cancer [NCT00070434]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to poor accrual)
Phase II Study of Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelium [NCT00066612]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Second-line Irinotecan Combined With Cetuximab (c-CetuIRI) Versus Second-line Irinotecan Three-line Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab (s-IRI-CetuIRI) in the Treatment of Oxaliplatin and 5-FU Phase II Clinical Study of Wild-type Advanced Colorectal Cancer With RAS [NCT04833036]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-01Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Experienced Failure of an Anthracycline, a Taxane, and Capecitabine [NCT00072852]Phase 2134 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
A Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, Controlled, Dose-elevation, Multicenter Trial of an Investigational Drug for the Prevention of Diarrhea Associated With Irinotecan/5FU/Leucovorin Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal [NCT00040391]Phase 20 participants Interventional2002-06-30Terminated
Phase I/II Study of Oral S-1 Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group HGCSG0101 [NCT00209638]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants Interventional2000-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Irinotecan Induction Chemotherapy, Followed by ZD 1839 (IRESSA) in Adult Patients With Surgically Unresectable and/or Metastatic Esophageal or Gastric Carcinomas [NCT00215995]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, and Capecitabine as a Combination Regimen for First-Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00217711]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Phase II Trial Evaluating Irinotecan and Capecitabine in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Upper Gastrointestinal Tumours [NCT00220168]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Randomized Trial of Treatment Strategy for Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer, FFCD 2000-05 [NCT00126256]Phase 3570 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-02-28Completed
Phase II Clinical Study of Preoperative S-1/CPT-11 Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT00134095]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-09-30Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Irinotecan Followed by Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Breast Carcinoma [NCT00083148]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Irinotecan And Cytarabine In Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia And In Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia In Myeloid Blast Transformation: Efficacy And In Vitro Correlates [NCT00053144]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-11-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Cetuximab, Irinotecan, Cisplatin (CPC), Concurrent Radiation Therapy, and Surgery for Resectable Esophageal Cancer [NCT00165490]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Early Identification and Treatment of Occult Metastatic Disease in Stage III Colon Cancer [NCT03803553]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-16Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Celecoxib, Irinotecan and Concurrent Radiotherapy in the Preoperative Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00177853]Phase 123 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to terminated)
Phase II Study of Irinotecan Followed by Gemcitabine in NSCLC Following Failure of Platinum Based Therapy [NCT00182806]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Phase I Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Trial of Intra-Peritoneal Irinotecan [NCT00183859]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
A Phase I Study of ZD1839 (Iressa) in Combination With Irinotecan (Camptosar or CPT-11) and Vincristine in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00186979]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
An Open-Labeled, Non-Randomized Phase I Study of Alvocidib (Flavopiridol) Administered With Irinotecan (CPT-11) and Cisplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00046917]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Gemcitabine (IrinoGem) Combined With 3-D Conformal Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00192712]Phase 2/Phase 320 participants Interventional2002-11-30Completed
An Open-label Study of the Effect of Continuous Xeloda Therapy in Combination With Irinotecan on Treatment Response in Patients With Advanced and/or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00048126]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Pertuzumab in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00551421]Phase 1/Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Phase I Clinical Trial of M6620 (VX-970, Berzosertib) in Combination With the Topoisomerase I Inhibitor Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT02595931]Phase 166 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-22Active, not recruiting
The ADAPTA Study: ADjuvant chemotherAPy After Curative Intent resecTion of Ampullary Cancer. A Pan-European Prospective Multicenter Double Single Arm Cohort Study. [NCT06068023]400 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-07-01Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Breast Cancer Patients With Brian Metastases That Have Progressed After Stereotactic Radiosurgery or Whole Brain Radiation [NCT00617539]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Randomised Phase 2 Trial Assessing REGorafenib Combined With IRInotecan as Second-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Gastro-oesophageal Adenocarcinomas [NCT03722108]Phase 1/Phase 289 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-07Terminated(stopped due to Unfavorable benefit-risk balance in the experimental arm following the IDMC for intermediate efficacy and safety analysis)
A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study to Determine the Optimal First-line Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03487016]Phase 2270 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-15Active, not recruiting
Intra-arterial Hepatic Bevacizumab and Systemic Chemotherapy in Hepatic Metastases of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Phase II Multicentric Study With Patients in Progression After First Line Systemic Chemotherapy [NCT01677884]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-label, Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lurbinectedin in Combination With Irinotecan in Pretreated Patients With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT02611024]Phase 1/Phase 2320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-06Recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter Study of PD-1 Antibody Combined With mXELIRI Versus mXELIRI in the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma [NCT05737563]Phase 3380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-17Recruiting
The TRIPLETE Study RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY OF TRIPLET mFOLFOXIRI PLUS PANITUMUMAB Versus mFOLFOX6 PLUS PANITUMUMAB AS INITIAL THERAPY FOR UNRESECTABLE RAS AND BRAF WILDTYPE METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS [NCT03231722]Phase 3435 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-13Completed
A Phase II Study: Irinotecan and Etoposide as Treatment for Refractory, Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00693719]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Study of Sequential Topoisomerase, Irinotecan/Oxaliplatin-Etoposide/Carboplatin in Extensive SCLC [NCT00240097]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Single-Arm, Multicenter, Prospective, Phase 2 Study for the Evaluation of Biomarkers in Patients With Advanced &/or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild Type KRAS Treated Biweekly With Chemotherapy and Cetuximab as First-Line Treatment [NCT01276379]Phase 2221 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Fluzoparib Combined With Fluzoparib as Second-line Treatment in Patients With Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Single-center, Open-label, Single-arm Study . [NCT05732129]Phase 229 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-01Not yet recruiting
CAPRI 2 GOIM Study: Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of a Bio- Marker-driven Cetuximab-based Treatment Regimen Over 3 Treatment Lines in mCRC Patients With RAS/BRAF wt Tumors at Start of First Line [NCT05312398]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-15Recruiting
A Pilot Protocol Evaluating Safety of Using the Medtronic Pump and Codman Catheter for the Delivery of Hepatic Arterial Infusion (HAI) Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Carcinoma or Cholangiocarcinoma [NCT03693807]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-18Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Dose-Dense Doxorubicin, Ifosfamide, and Irinotecan (CPT-11) for Advanced Soft Tissue and Recurrent Bone Sarcomas [NCT00544778]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated prematurely due to withdrawal of support by the sponsor.)
Impact of Early FDG-PET Directed Intervention on Preoperative Therapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Random Assignment Phase II Study [NCT02485834]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
A Phase I/II Study of Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine (XELOXIRI) and Bevacizumab as a First-line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT04380103]Phase 1/Phase 2106 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-26Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Preoperative Irinotecan, Cisplatin and Radiation in Esophageal Cancer [NCT00316862]Phase 282 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Single-arm, Open-label, Phase II Clinical Study of Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan in Patients With NeoRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer In Third-line Therapy [NCT05962502]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-24Recruiting
Randomized Phase III Trial of mFOLFIRINOX vs. FOLFOX With Nivolumab for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic HER2- Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma [NCT05677490]Phase 3382 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-23Recruiting
Multicentric Phase II Trial: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRI Association Treatment in Patients 70 Years Old and More Presenting Gastric Cancer Locally Advanced or Metastatic [NCT00210184]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-21Completed
A Phase Ib/II Study of Sotorasib Combined With Chemotherapy for Second Line Treatment of KRAS p. G12C Mutated Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT05251038]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-13Withdrawn(stopped due to Funder Decision)
An Expanded Access Program of AvastinTM (Bevacizumab) in Patients With Metastatic Cancer of the Colon or Rectum [NCT02582970]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Phase 1-2 Trial Evaluating Metronomic Chemotherapy in Patients With a Relapsed or Refractory Wilms Tumor [NCT05384821]Phase 1/Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-14Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Weekly Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in the Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Carcinoma and Carcinoma of the Gastroesophageal (GE) Junction [NCT00256269]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated by funding entity)
CIRSE Registry for LifePearl Microspheres [NCT03086096]152 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2018-02-02Completed
Essai De Phase III De Chimiotherapie Par FOLFOX 4 Ou Par Une Succession FOLFOX 7 - FOLFIRI Chez Des Patients Ayant Des Metastases Resecables D'Origine Colorectale - MIROX [NCT00268398]Phase 3284 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-07-31Completed
A Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy of Cetuximab Rechallenge in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (RAS Wild-type) Responding to First-line Treatment With FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab [NCT02934529]Phase 3673 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study Of Capecitabine in Combination With Cisplatin and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Malignancies. [NCT00249977]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Open Label, Randomised, Multicenter Phase III Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Radically Resected Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction: Comparison of a Sequential Treatment (CPT-11+5-FU/LV --> TXT+CDDP) Versus a 5-FU/LV Regimen [NCT01640782]Phase 31,100 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Etude de Recherche de Dose de l'Association Irinotecan (Campto(R)) - Cisplatine (Cisplatyl(R)) Avec la radiothérapie Pelvienne Dans Les Cancers avancés du Col de l'utérus. [NCT00251888]Phase 115 participants Interventional2002-11-30Completed
Irinotecan Single-Drug Treatment For Children With Refractory or Recurrent Hepatoblastoma [NCT00287976]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-04-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1 Trial of RRx-001 in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Pediatric Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Malignant Solid and Central Nervous System Tumors [NCT04525014]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-26Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial: Docetaxel, Irinotecan, and Carboplatin in the Treatment of Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Carcinoma [NCT00264134]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants Interventional2003-06-30Terminated
Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Carboplatin, Bevacizumab, and Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Patients With Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00308529]Phase 255 participants Interventional2006-03-31Completed
LCCC 0215: Induction Chemotherapy Using Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, CPT-11 With Pegfilgrastim Support Followed by Conformal Radiotherapy and Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/ZD1839 in Locally Advanced Unresectable Stage IIIA/B Non-Small Cell Carcinoma of the Lung [NCT00280787]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-11-30Completed
Phase I/II Study of High Dose Irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) in Patients With Recurrent Unresectable Malignant Glioma on Steroids/Anti-epileptics [NCT00283556]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
A Randomised Study of Sequential Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00312000]Phase 3820 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Phase II/III Trial of CPT-11/5-FU/l-LV (FOLFIRI) Versus CPT-11/TS-1 (IRIS) as Second Line Chemotherapy of Unresectable Colorectal Cancer [NCT00284258]Phase 2/Phase 3426 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Randomised, Open-label Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Folfox6 + Cetuximab as First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00286130]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Second-Line Therapy With Irinotecan or Gefitinib in Docetaxel Pretreated Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a New Treatment Strategy According to Clinical Predictors for Response [NCT00319800]Phase 250 participants Interventional2006-02-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of JS015 Combination Therapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT06139211]Phase 1/Phase 2186 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Phase-II Study of Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric of Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Induction Irinotecan/Cisplatin, Potentially Curative Surgery With or Without Adjuvant Intraperitoneal Floxuridine, Followed by Prolonged [NCT00848783]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Due to slow accrual)
A Phase 1b, Multicenter Study to Determine the Dose, Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of TRK-950 When Used in Combinations With Selected Anti-Cancer Treatment Regimens in Patients With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT03872947]Phase 1169 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-26Recruiting
Randomized Study of Classic vs Simplified Leucovorin Calcium and Fluorouracil With or Without Irinotecan in Patients Aged At Least 75 Years With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00303771]Phase 3282 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Weekly Trastuzumab (Herceptin) and Irinotecan in Patients With HER-2 Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Phase II Trial [NCT00303992]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
C-2424: Phase II Study of Celecoxib, Capecitabine, and Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00230399]Phase 215 participants Interventional2003-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of S-1 and Irinotecan Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer as a First-Line Therapy [NCT00343668]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-09-30Recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Magrolimab in Combination With Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI Versus Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI in Previously Treated Advanced Inoperable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) [NCT05330429]Phase 2135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-08Recruiting
Phase III Multicenter Randomized Open-label Study of Irinotecan Plus Capecitabine Versus Capecitabine in Patients Previously Treated With Anthracycline and Taxane for HER2 Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer[PROCEED] [NCT01501669]Phase 3222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-06-30Recruiting
An Observational Study of Avastin® (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Chemotherapy for Treatment of First-line Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma [NCT01506167]719 participants (Actual)Observational2012-07-06Completed
Phase II Study of Irinotecan for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00003245]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-02-18Completed
Phase Ⅱ Study of Relationship Between UGT1A1 Gene Polymorphism and Toxicity and Efficacy of Irinotecan in Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT01635400]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-06-30Recruiting
Phase II Randomized Pharmacogenetic Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRI Schedule With High Doses of Irinotecan (FOLFIRI-AD) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer According to UGT1A Genotype 1. [NCT01639326]Phase 296 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Recruiting
A Phase II, Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab in Patients With MRI Defined High-Risk Cancer of the Rectum [NCT01650428]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A Phase Ib Ascending Multi-arm, Dose Escalation Study of BMS-906024 Combined With Several Chemotherapy Regimens in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Tumors [NCT01653470]Phase 1141 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-12Completed
A Non-randomized Phase II Protocol of Irinotecan for Patients With Previously Treated, Advanced ISG15-positive Non-small Cell Carcinoma of the Lung [NCT01654081]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A RANDOMIZED PHASE 2 STUDY OF PF-05212384 PLUS IRINOTECAN VERSUS CETUXIMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN IN PATIENTS WITH KRAS AND NRAS WILD TYPE METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER [NCT01925274]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-15Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment to the study was terminated on 11Nvo2014 due to slow recruitment. There were no safety or efficacy issues that contributed to this decision.)
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of GS-5745 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Chemotherapy in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT01803282]Phase 1236 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-29Completed
Phase II Study to Evaluate Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFIRINOX and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT03099265]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-26Terminated(stopped due to Paused due to COVID. A determination was made to stop the study because it would be impossible to reach the 65% resection rate as outlined in the protocol.)
Phase III Intergroup Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) (NSC# 616348) Plus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (5-FU/LV) Versus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Alone After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer [NCT00003835]Phase 31,260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1999-05-31Completed
Dose Finding Study of S-1, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan Combination Chemotherapy for Patients With Inoperable Advanced or Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancers [NCT01693445]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Treatment Strategies in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Initially Unresectable Liver-only Metastases CAIRO5 a Randomized Phase 3 Study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) [NCT02162563]Phase 3564 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Recruiting
Phase II Study of Liposomal Irinotecan With TAS102 and Bevacizumab for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT05854498]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-13Recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Open-Label, Umbrella Platform Design Study of Investigational Agents With or Without Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) and/or Chemotherapy in Participants With Advanced Esophageal Cancer Previously Exposed to PD-1/PD-L1 Treatment (KEYMAKER-U06): Substud [NCT05319730]Phase 1/Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-16Recruiting
Phase II Individualized Therapies Selection Study for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma According to the Genomic Expression Profile in Tumor Samples. [NCT01703910]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial Assessing Sorafenib in Combination With Irinotecan in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With KRAS Mutated Tumors After Failure of All Drugs Known to be Effective [NCT01715441]Phase 2173 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Apatinib and Irinotecan Combination Treatment in Unresectable or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Failed in First-line Chemotherapy: A Phase II Study [NCT03251417]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-10Terminated(stopped due to Because PD-1 antibodies had been proved to be a standard second-line treatment in esophageal cancer, the potential benefit of present intervention is under re-evaluation.)
A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase Ⅱ/Ш Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of KN026 in Combination With Chemotherapy in Subjects With HER2 Positive Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric Cancer (Including Gastro-esophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma) [NCT05427383]Phase 2/Phase 3286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-07Recruiting
Phase 2 Single-Arm Study of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Refractory Advanced High Grade Neuroendocrine Cancer of GI, Unknown or Pancreatic Origin [NCT03736720]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-17Active, not recruiting
Phase 1/2 Study of 9-ING-41, a Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Beta (GSK-3β) Inhibitor, as a Single Agent and Combined With Chemotherapy, in Patients With Refractory Hematologic Malignancies or Solid Tumors [NCT03678883]Phase 2350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-04Recruiting
Neoadjuvant CAPOXIRI Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Resectable, Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Protocol [NCT01760252]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated
Multi-Modality Therapy for Untreated Patients With Resectable or Marginally Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01760694]6 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of enrollment)
A Prospective Evaluation of Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Regimen in Patients With Non-metastatic Pancreas Cancer (Baylor University Medical Center and Texas Oncology Experience) [NCT01771146]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-10-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial To Evaluate The Efficiency And Safety Of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy In Locally Advanced Cancer Cervix [NCT04789941]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Not yet recruiting
Open, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Trial With Cetuximab /5-FU/FA/Irinotecan or Cetuximab/5-FU/FA /Irinotecan/Oxaliplatin in K-ras/B-raf Wild Type Patients or With Irinotecan/Oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA With or Without Bevacizumab in K-ras Mutant Patients as N [NCT01802645]Phase 291 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Japan-Korea-Taiwan Collaborative Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy of Nimotuzumab and Irinotecan Combination Therapy Versus Irinotecan Monotherapy as Second Line Treatment in Subjects With Advanced or Recurrent Gastric and Ga [NCT01813253]Phase 3400 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-13Terminated
A Phase II Study of Panitumumab in Combination With FOLFIRI After Progression on FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab in KRAS(Kirsten Rat Sarcoma) and NRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. [NCT01814501]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-01Active, not recruiting
Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and Chemoradiation Followed by Definitive Surgery and Postoperative Gemcitabine for Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: An Intergroup Single-Arm Pilot Study [NCT01821612]Early Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
A Phase Ib/II, Open-label Study of LJM716 in Combination With BYL719 Compared to Taxane or Irinotecan in Patients With Previously Treated Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) [NCT01822613]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-26Completed
Comparison of Standard and High Dose Irinotecan Based on UGT1A1 Genotype, 5-fluorouracil, and Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) for First-line Treatment of Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: a Prospective Phase II Clinical Study [NCT01826396]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-04-30Recruiting
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib Versus Irinotecan as a Second-line and Above Treatment for Advanced ALTRK-negative ESCC [NCT05818982]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-09Recruiting
Phase Ib/II Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer With Anti-CD3 x Anti-EGFR-Bispecific Antibody Armed Activated T-Cells (BATs) in Combination With Low Dose IL-2 and GM-CSF [NCT02620865]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study of IHL-305 (Irinotecan Liposome Injection) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00364143]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Phase II Study of AVELUMAB and CETUXIMAB and Modified FOLFOXIRI as Initial Therapy for RAS Wild-type Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT04513951]Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-01Active, not recruiting
Intermittent or Continuous Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for First-line Treatment of Patients With RAS/B-RAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Randomized Phase 2 Trial [NCT04425239]Phase 2151 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-21Completed
High-dose FOLFIRI Versus Standard-dose FOLFIRI or FOLFOX-6 in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients With Wild-type UGT1A1*6 and *28: A Randomized, Opened, Phase II Clinical Trial [NCT03329183]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-31Recruiting
Phase Ⅱ Study of FOLFIRI as Second-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Esophageal Carcinoma [NCT02023593]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Open, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing CMAB009 Plus FOLFIRI Versus FOLFIRI Alone as First-line Treatment for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-expressing, RAS/BRAF Wild-type, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT03206151]Phase 3520 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-12Active, not recruiting
A Fixed-Sequence, Open-Label Study to Determine the Activity of SCH 717454 as Assessed by Positron Emission Tomography in Subjects With Relapsed or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer [NCT00551213]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-21Completed
Phase II Single Arm Clinical Trial of FOLFIRINOX for Unresectable Locally Advanced and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01688336]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Results unlikely to impact treatment patterns. Time to complete not justified.)
Phase 1 Study of Pazopanib in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide (PAZIT) for Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Sarcoma [NCT03139331]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-06Completed
A Pilot Study of FOLFIRINOX in Combination With Neoadjuvant Radiation for Gastric and GE Junction Cancers [NCT03279237]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-24Active, not recruiting
A Single-Arm Phase II Study in Japan to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept Administered Every Two Weeks in Combination With FOLFIRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Progressed During or Following an Oxaliplatin-Based Regimen [NCT01882868]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
An Exploratory Study of Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Based Upon Thymidine Phosphorylase Expression, KRAS and BRAF Mutation Status, and ERCC1 Expression [NCT01280643]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Feasibility and Prospective Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Irinotecan Bead in Combination With Second Line Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00816777]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of enrollment)
A Phase 2, Randomized Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy, and Optimal Dose of ABBV-400 in Combination With Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid, and Bevacizumab in Previously Treated Subjects With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT06107413]Phase 2206 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-12Recruiting
A Randomized, Open Label Study of the Effect of First Line Treatment With Xeloda in Combination With Avastin and Either Short Course Irinotecan or Short Course Oxaliplatin on Progression-free Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00642603]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated
Study Investigating the Association of NP137 With mFOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [NCT05546853]Phase 152 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-28Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Mitomycin C, Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Patients With Previously Treated, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00271011]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was discontinued due to the death of a co-investigator and a second co-investigator leaving the institution.)
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial of Tisotumab Vedotin vs Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in Second- or Third-Line Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer [NCT04697628]Phase 3556 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-22Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Regorafenib Followed by Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibody Therapy Versus the Reverse Sequencing for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Previously Treated With Fluoropyrimidine, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan (REVERCE II) [NCT04117945]Phase 2124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-03Recruiting
Phase II Multicentric Randomized Trial, Evaluating the Best Protocol of Chemotherapy, Associated With Targeted Therapy According to the Tumor KRAS Status, in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CCRM) Patients With Initially Non-resectable Hepatic Metastases [NCT01442935]Phase 2256 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Genotype-drive Phase II Study of Novel Irinotecan-Cisplatin Combination as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT01444521]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
BrUOG 329: Onivyde (Nanoliposomal Irinotecan) and Metronomic Temozolomide for Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Phase IB/IIA Brown University Oncology Research Group Study [NCT03119064]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-30Terminated(stopped due to lack of response to study therapy)
GENOCARE: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Genotype-Guided Dosing Versus Usual Care [NCT05391126]178 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-28Recruiting
Sequential Combined TAS-102 and Oxaliplatin Alternating With TAS-102 and Irinotecan (Sequential TASOXIRI) With Bevacizumab for Late-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT05806931]Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-17Recruiting
An Adaptive Approach to Neoadjuvant Therapy to Maximize Resection Rates for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Phase II Trial [NCT04594772]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-17Recruiting
Phase II Pilot Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Panitumumab in Metastatic RAS Wild-type, Left-sided Colorectal Cancer [NCT04169347]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-02Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial of Cisplatin and Irinotecan in Patients With Suboptimally Debulked, Incompletely Responding Ovarian Cancer [NCT00003345]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-10-31Completed
I-SPY Trial (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging And moLecular Analysis 2) [NCT01042379]Phase 25,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-01Recruiting
Prospective, Open Label, Randomized Phase II Trial to Assess a Multimodal Molecular Targeted Therapy in Children, Adolescent and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory High-risk Neuroblastoma [NCT01467986]Phase 2130 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Randomised, Open-label, Phase II, Dose/Schedule Optimisation Study of NUC-3373/Leucovorin/Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab (NUFIRI-bev) Versus 5-FU/Leucovorin/Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-bev) for the Treatment of Patients With Previously Treated Unr [NCT05678257]Phase 2171 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-18Recruiting
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Total Neo-adjuvant Therapy vs Conventional Chemo-radiation Aiming at Increasing Rates of Clinical Complete Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT05081687]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-20Recruiting
Risk-Stratified Adjuvant Therapy: ctDNA-Directed Post-Hepatectomy Chemotherapy for Patients With Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases [NCT05062317]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-26Recruiting
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of Olaratumab as a Single Agent and in Combination With Doxorubicin, Vincristine/Irinotecan, or High-Dose Ifosfamide in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT02677116]Phase 168 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-29Completed
Phase II Study of Pegliposomal Doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil Compared With Irinotecan as Second Line Therapy for Metastatic Gastric Cancer. [NCT04358341]Phase 2136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-17Recruiting
Combination of Bevacizumab, Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: A Phase II Study [NCT01114555]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-29Completed
Phase II Combination of Gemcitabine (Fixed Dose-rate Infusion, FDR), Irinotecan and Panitumumab in Patients With Advanced and Metastatic Biliary Tract Adenocarcinoma [NCT00948935]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase II Open Label, Dose-finding run-in and Cohort Expansion Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Effectiveness of AUM001 in Combination With Pembrolizumab or Irinotecan in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT05462236]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-14Recruiting
Phase II Study of Panitumumab in Combination With Irinotecan for Malignant Gliomas [NCT01017653]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Terminated(stopped due to study did not reach benchmark efficacy rule at 16 subjects)
A Phase II Trial of Immunotherapy Combined With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Microsatellite Instability-High Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT04411524]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Not yet recruiting
Phase 1B/2 Study of Lurbinectedin With or Without Irinotecan for Patients With Relapsed or High Risk Chemotherapy-Naive Ewing Sarcoma [NCT05042934]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-15Withdrawn(stopped due to PI stated trial no longer fits the framework & portfolio of work that is prioritized by the department. PI will not have the anticipated accrual in PI view to complete the study. Given that, PI request this protocol be closed prior to its activation.)
A Phase II Study of the PARP Inhibitor, INIPARIB (BSI-201), in Combination With Chemotherapy to Treat Triple Negative Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis [NCT01173497]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Phase Ib/II Open Label Study to Assess the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of NUC-3373, a Nucleotide Analogue, Given in Combination With Standard Agents Used in Colorectal Cancer Treatment [NCT03428958]Phase 1/Phase 2225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-16Recruiting
Phase II Study Of Gemcitabine And CPT-11 (Irinotecan) In Locally Advanced Or Metastatic Bladder Cancer [NCT00089128]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
A Phase II/I Open-Label Clinical Trial of CPI-613 in Combination With Modified FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Good Performance Status [NCT03699319]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-07Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Panitumumab Followed by Evaluation for Resection, in Patients With Metastatic KRAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases Only [NCT01226719]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Neoadjuvant Treatment With mFOLFOXIRI Plus Cadonilimab (AK104) Versus mFOLFOX6 Alone in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: a Randomized Control Phase II Study (OPTICAL-2) [NCT05571644]Phase 282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-15Not yet recruiting
CKD-702 Plus Irinotecan as a ≥3L Therapy for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinomas Overexpressing EGFR or MET [NCT05750290]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Recruiting
PHASE I TRIAL OF IRINOTECAN AND TOMUDEX IN COMBINATION ON AN EVERY THREE WEEK SCHEDULE [NCT00002902]Phase 10 participants Interventional1997-04-30Completed
Phase I Study of Anti-Tenascin Monoclonal Antibody I-Labeled 81C6 Via Surgically Created Cystic Resection Cavity in the Treatment of Patients With Primary Brain Tumors After External Beam Radiotherapy [NCT00003484]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-09-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Preoperative Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Patients With High-Risk Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00003544]Phase 20 participants Interventional1998-06-30Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma [NCT00003616]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional1998-10-22Completed
A Phase I Clinical Trial to Investigate the Correlation Between UGT1A1 Genotype and Irinotecan (CPT-11) Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity in Cancer Patients [NCT00003970]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-01-31Completed
Phase I Trial of Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies [NCT00003742]Phase 10 participants Interventional1998-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastric Cardia [NCT00003748]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-08-31Completed
Phase II Study of Gemcitabine and CPT-11 (Irinotecan) in Unresectable or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00089102]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
Phase II Trial of Irinotecan in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00004078]Phase 2181 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-10-31Completed
A Phase I/II, Pharmacokinetic, and Biologic Correlative Study of G3139, NSC # 683428 (Phosphorothioate Antisense Oligonucleotide Directed to Bcl-2) and Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00004870]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00004924]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-03-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Oxaliplatin, CPT-11, 5-FU and Leucovorin in Patients With Solid Tumors [NCT00005068]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Phase II Trial With Correlative Laboratory Studies of Single Agent Irinotecan (Camptosar CPT-11) in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Indolent Lymphoproliferative Malignancies [NCT00005626]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-02-28Completed
Phase I Trial of Combined Modality Irinotecan, Cisplatin, and Concurrent Radiation Therapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer [NCT00005638]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
A Randomized Multi-center Phase I/II Trial of ICM (Irinotecan, Cisplatin, Mitomycin C) With or Without AZD2281 (Olaparib) in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01296763]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study Evaluating the Rate of R0 Resection (Microscopically Negative Margins) After Induction Therapy With 5- Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) in Patients With Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Inoperable Pa [NCT01359007]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Terminated(stopped due to The principal investigator terminated the study due to inactivity and low enrollment)
A Pilot Trial of GI-4000 Plus Bevacizumab and Either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI in Patients With Ras Mutant Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, Either Newly Diagnosed or Previously Treated. [NCT01322815]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual rate)
A Phase III Trial of Irinotecan / 5-FU / Leucovorin or Oxaliplatin / 5-FU/ Leucovorin With Bevacizumab, or Cetuximab (C225), or With the Combination of Bevacizumab and Cetuximab for Patients With Untreated Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Colon or Rectum [NCT00265850]Phase 32,334 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
An Open Labelled Phase III Adjuvant Trial of Disease-free Survival in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Randomized to Allocation of Oxaliplatin- or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy by Standard Clinical Criteria or by a Transcriptomic T [NCT05314998]Phase 3394 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-01Not yet recruiting
FaR-RMS: An Overarching Study for Children and Adults With Frontline and Relapsed RhabdoMyoSarcoma [NCT04625907]Phase 1/Phase 21,672 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-17Recruiting
Open-label Prospective Study of Recombinant Human Endostatin Combined With Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Regimen in the Treatment of Recurrent Gliomas [NCT04267978]Phase 2109 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-13Recruiting
A Randomised Phase IIb Trial of Bevacizumab Added to Temozolomide ± Irinotecan for Children With Refractory/Relapsed Neuroblastoma - BEACON-Neuroblastoma Trial [NCT02308527]Phase 2225 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of the Rate of Conversion to Complete Resection in Patients With Initially Inoperable Hepatic-Only Metastases From Colorectal Cancer After Treatment With Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Floxuridine and Dexamethasone in Combination With Bes [NCT00492999]Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-05-31Active, not recruiting
An Exploratory Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) With Algenpantucel-L (HyperAcute®-Pancreas) Immunotherapy in Subjects With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02405585]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Terminated
Study of the Practice of Debiri in France: Indications, Associations to Systemic Treatments, Efficiency, Tolerance - Prospective Practice Survey [NCT03369041]70 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2016-02-03Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Study Evaluating Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) With or Without Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Pancreatic Cancer Radiotherapy Study Group (PanCRS) Trial [NCT01926197]Phase 327 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-14Completed
Tislelizumab Plus Cetuximab and Irinotecan Comparing the Third-line Standard-of-care Selected by Researchers in the Treatment of Ras Wild-type Recurrent Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT05278351]Phase 287 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-13Recruiting
A Single-arm, Phase Ⅱ Clinical Trial of Anlotinib Hydrochloride Combined With Irinotecan or Docetaxel for Second Line Treatment of Nonsensitive Relapsed Small-cell Lung Cancer [NCT04757779]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-30Recruiting
Spleen Irradiation With Nanoliposomal Irinotecan Plus 5-FU and Leucovorin in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: a Phase II Study (SINAI) [NCT05363007]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Recruiting
Phase 1 Study of 9-ING-41, a Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Beta (GSK 3β) Inhibitor, as a Single Agent or With Irinotecan, Irinotecan Plus Temozolomide, or With Cyclophosphamide Plus Topotecan in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Malignancies. [NCT04239092]Phase 168 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-05Active, not recruiting
Concomitant Intraperitoneal and Systemic Chemotherapy in Patients With Extensive Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Gastric Origin [NCT05379790]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-25Recruiting
An Open-label 2:1 Randomized Phase II Study of Panitumumab Plus FOLFOXIRI or FOLFOXIRI Alone as First-line Treatment of Patients With Non-resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and RAS Wild Type [NCT01328171]Phase 293 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Phase I Dose-Finding Study of E7070 in Combination With Irinotecan [NCT00060567]Phase 188 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
"Phase-2 Study Evaluating Overall Response Rate (Efficacy) and Autonomy Daily Living Preservation (Tolerance) of FOLFIRINOX Pharmacogenetic Dose Adjusted, in Elderly Patients (70 yo. or Older) With a Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma." [NCT02143219]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Phase III Study in mCRC Patients With RAS/BRAF Wild Type Tissue and RAS Mutated in LIquid BIopsy to Compare in First-line Therapy FOLFIRI Plus CetuxiMAb or BevacizumaB (LIBImAb Study) [NCT04776655]Phase 3280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-30Recruiting
A Phase IIA Open Label, Adaptive, Randomized Clinical Trial of Dalotuzumab (MK-0646) Treatment in Combination With Irinotecan Versus Cetuximab and Irinotecan for Patients With Metastatic Rectal Cancers (mRC) Expressing High IGF-1/Low IGF-2 Levels [NCT01609231]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-06Terminated(stopped due to This trial was halted prematurely for business reasons and low enrollment.)
A Phase I, Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of Ascending Doses of AZD0156 Monotherapy or in Combination With Either Cytotoxic Chemotherapies or Novel Anti-Cancer Agents in Patients With Advance [NCT02588105]Phase 184 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-10Completed
A Phase II Study Of Gemcitabine (GEMZAR) And Irinotecan (CPT-11) In Previously Untreated Patients With Measurable Disease With Unknown Primary Carcinoma [NCT00066781]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Phase II Trial of Concurrent Irinotecan, Carboplatin and Radiation Therapy Followed by Bevacizumab (Avastin) in the Treatment of Patients With Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00193375]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
Open-label, Single Arm Phase II Trial Investigating the Efficacy, Safety and Quality of Life of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Liposomal Irinotecan Combined With Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid Followed by Curative Surgical Resection in Patient [NCT04617457]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-10Recruiting
Pharmacokinetics Study of Nimotuzumab Single-dose and Multiple-dose in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Solid Tumors [NCT02395068]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-11-30Active, not recruiting
Re-challenge of Anti-EGFR Agents for Chinese Patients With RAS/BRAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT04224415]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-31Completed
A Prospective Study for Real-world Data (RWD) of Ramucirumab Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma [NCT04915807]222 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2021-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Feasibility of Irinotecan, Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102), and Oxaliplatin (iTTo) for Treatment Naive Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma [NCT04808791]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-31Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter Phase I/II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Primary Efficacy of LY01616 (Irinotecan Hydrochloride and Floxuridine Liposome Injection) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT05865925]Phase 1/Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-22Enrolling by invitation
A Phase II Trial of Immunotherapy Combined With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Microsatellite Stable Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT04411537]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Not yet recruiting
A Non-comparative Randomized Phase 2 Study, Evaluating the Efficacy of 5-FU + NALIRI and 5-FU + NALIRINOX for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), Progressive After Gemcitabine-Abraxane or Gemcitabine Monotherapy [NCT05472259]Phase 2134 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-25Recruiting
A Phase II Study of RRx-001 in Platinum Refractory/Resistant Small Cell Carcinoma, EGFR TKI Resistant EGFR+ T790M Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, High Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors and Resistant/Refractory Ovarian Cancer Prior to Re-administration of P [NCT02489903]Phase 2139 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Phase II Study to Evaluatate the Efficacy of Gemcitabine Plus Erlotinib for RASH-positive Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer and Friendly Risk Circumstances [NCT01729481]Phase 2150 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Parallel Control, Exploratory Trial to Compare Apatinib Plus Irinotecan Versus Single Irinotecan as Second-line Treatment in Subjects With Advanced Gastric Cancer or Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction [NCT03030937]Phase 274 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase Ib/II , Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Anti-Tumor Effects of SC0245 in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With ES-SCLC [NCT05731518]Phase 1/Phase 267 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-23Recruiting
An Open-label, Single-centre, Single-arm Phase II Study of Capecitabine Combined With Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan (Xeloxiri) as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT01558869]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Second-line Therapy With Nal-IRI After Failure Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer - Predictive Role of 1st-line Therapy [NCT03468335]Phase 3270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II, Single Arm, Open Label Clinical Trial With Irinotecan in Combination With Cisplatin in Pediatric Patients With Unfavorable Prognosis Gliomas [NCT01574092]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan Liposome and Bevacizumab in Women With Platinum Resistant Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [NCT04753216]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-16Completed
*Official Title: Randomized, Open-label, Single-dose, Two-sequence, Two-period, Crossover Bioequivalence Trial of Irinotecan Liposome Injection in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. [NCT04482257]Phase 148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-07Recruiting
A Phase II Randomized Study of the Protection Effect of Chinese Herbal Compound Dendrobium Huoshanense Granules in NCRT for Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT04394598]Phase 2210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-01Recruiting
Perioperative Chemotherapy With FOLFIRINOX Regimen or FLOT Regimen for Resectable Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma (Type II-III): Open-label Randomized Phase 2/3 Trial [NCT04393584]Phase 2/Phase 3538 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-29Recruiting
Phase II Clinical Study on Resectable or Borderline Resectable Pancreas Adenocarcinoma Preoperative Treatment With Chemotherapy and Carbon Ions Radiation Therapy (Hadrontherapy) [NCT03822936]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-08Recruiting
One Arm, Exploratory Study of Tislelizumab Combined With Anlotinib and 2-cycle Irinotecan Monotherapy as Second Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT05027100]33 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-30Recruiting
A Randomized, Phase III Comparison of Gemcitabine/Irinotecan Followed by IRESSA Versus Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Etoposide Followed by IRESSA in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site [NCT00193596]Phase 3198 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-09-30Completed
Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI Chemotherapy Versus CapeOX Chemotherapy for Local Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial [NCT05201430]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-27Recruiting
Phase II Study of Irinotecan, Leucovorin, 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) Plus Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00354978]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Irinotecan HCI in Patients With Recurrent Anaplastic Astrocytomas, Mixed Malignant Gliomas, and Oligodendrogliomas [NCT00360828]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Principal Investigator left Moffitt and study had low accrual.)
A Phase 1b Study of Irinotecan, Levofolinate, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) Drug Product in Japanese Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Progressive During or Following First-Line Combination Therapy With Bevacizumab, [NCT01286818]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and CPT-11 as First Line Treatment for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00316433]Phase 224 participants Interventional2005-02-28Terminated
Irinotecan Combined With S-1( IRIS ) Followed by mFOLFOX6 Regimen Versus mFOLFOX6 Followed by IRIS Regimen in Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00316745]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Suspended(stopped due to Because of approval of Bevacizumab, it was difficult to perform clinical study in 1st line setting.)
A Randomized Trial of Irinotecan, Leucovorin, 5-FU (ILF) Versus ILF Plus Cisplatin (PILF) Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT00320294]Phase 286 participants Interventional2005-02-28Active, not recruiting
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Bevacizumab in Combination With Irinotecan for Malignant Gliomas [NCT00352521]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of Sorafenib and Irinotecan Combination Therapy in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT01518413]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A Multiarm, Open-label, Phase 1b Study of MLN2480 (an Oral A-, B-, and CRAF Inhibitor) in Combination With MLN0128 (an Oral mTORC 1/2 Inhibitor), or Alisertib (an Oral Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor), or Paclitaxel, or Cetuximab, or Irinotecan, in Adult Patien [NCT02327169]Phase 181 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-14Completed
Phase I/II Study of Intravenous Ascorbic Acid in Combination With Irinotecan Versus Irinotecan Alone for Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT01550510]Phase 1/Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Closed: low enrollment, many treatment options available for Colorectal Cancer)
A Pilot Study of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in Localized, Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT01660711]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Phase II Safety and Tolerability Study of Avastin When Added to Single-agent Chemotherapy to Treat Patient With Breast Cancer Metastatic to Brain [NCT00476827]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioma [NCT00003134]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-01-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of MLN8237 in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma [NCT01601535]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) and Cyclosporine in Patients With 5-FU Refractory Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00003950]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Multicentre Phase III Comparing To Therapeutic Sequence: Folfiri Following of Folfox6 (Group A) and Folfox6 Following Of (Group B) For Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00003260]Phase 3109 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-01-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I-II Study of Weekly CPT-11 and Radiation Therapy for Unresectable or Locally Recurrent Large Bowel Cancer [NCT00003344]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants Interventional1998-08-31Completed
Phase I Study of Irinotecan for Patients With Abnormal Liver or Renal Function or With Prior Pelvic Radiation Therapy [NCT00003368]Phase 10 participants Interventional1998-06-30Completed
Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Sequentially Administered CPT-11 and Mitomycin C in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00003710]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-08-31Completed
A Phase II Clinical Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Patients With Advanced High Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT00004922]Phase 20 participants Interventional1999-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) Versus Oxaliplatin (OXAL)/5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated With 5-FU [NCT00005036]Phase 3560 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-11-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Cisplatin and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer [NCT00003055]Phase 20 participants Interventional1997-06-30Completed
Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Trial of Irinotecan in Combination With Tomudex in Patients With Refractory Solid Malignancies [NCT00003109]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study to Evaluate Orally Administered Irinotecan HCL (CPT-11) Given as a Powder-Filled Capsule Formulation Daily for 14 Days Every Three Weeks in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00004051]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-08-31Completed
A Phase Ib Multicenter Study of TAS-102 in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Recurrent or Unresectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma After at Least One Line of Treatment With a Fluoropyrimidine and Platinum Containing Reg [NCT04074343]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-26Active, not recruiting
A Dose Finding and Safety/Efficacy Trial of CPT-11 (Irinotecan) in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Gliomas [NCT00003301]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants Interventional1998-07-31Completed
CPT-11 in Combination With Weekly 24 Hour Infusion 5-FU Plus Folinic Acid Relative to Weekly 24 Hour Infusion 5-FU Plus Folinic Acid Alone in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00004885]Phase 3430 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-07-31Completed
Phase I Trial of Irinotecan, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies [NCT00005791]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
A Phase II Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine and Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab Followed by Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Plus Bevacizumab or the Reverse Sequence in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02119026]Phase 2120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A PHASE I STUDY OF IRINOTECAN (CPT-11) WITH PHARMACOKINETIC MODULATION BY CYCLOSPORINE A AND PHENOBARBITAL [NCT00002759]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-06-30Completed
CWRU 1296: Biochemical and Pharmacokinetic Predictors of Colon Cancer Response to a Topoisomerase I Directed Treatment With Irinotecan [NCT00002933]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-09-30Completed
A Phase I Trial of Dose Escalated Irinotecan (CPT-11) With Paclitaxel in Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Malignancies [NCT00002939]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-11-30Completed
Phase II Clinical and Laboratory Study of Irinotecan/Cisplatin Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Stage III NSCLC [NCT00003111]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-04-30Completed
A Prospective Study of FOLFIRI Plus Panitumumab in Extended RAS Wild Type and BRAF Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Acquired Resistance to Prior Cetuximab (or Panitumumab) Plus Irinotecan-Based Therapy and Who Failed at Least One Subsequent Non [NCT02508077]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-16Terminated(stopped due to Poor Accrual)
A Pilot Study of Zimberelimab and Quemliclustat Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT05688215]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-07Recruiting
A Phase Ib Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AL2846 Capsule Combined With Chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI)Versus Placebo Combined With Chemotherapy in Subjects With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT04337879]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-20Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosolized Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in Ovarian, Uterine, Appendiceal, Colorectal, and Gastric Cancer Patients With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC) [NCT04329494]Phase 149 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-21Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Intravenous Ascorbic Acid and Folfirinox in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02896907]Early Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-18Completed
Perioperative Versus Adjuvant FOLFIRINOX for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: the PREOPANC-3 Study [NCT04927780]Phase 3378 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-07Recruiting
A Phase II Study of TAS-102, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab in Pre-Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (TABAsCO) [NCT04109924]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-27Active, not recruiting
A Prospective Phase II Trial of Molecular Profiling to Guide Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas [NCT01726582]Phase 2229 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Phase I/II Trial to Evaluate Ethyol as a Protective Agent for Irinotecan (CPT-11) Toxicities in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00003225]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-07-31Completed
Precision Chemotherapy Based on Organoid for Colorectal CancerPatient-Derived Tumor Organoid Drug Sensitivity for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective, Multicentre,Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT05832398]186 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Cetuximab With or Without the Anti-Angiogenic Antibody, Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), in Advanced, K-ras Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer Following Progression on Bevacizumab-Containing Chemotherapy [NCT01079780]Phase 2136 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-18Completed
Randomized Phase II Study of Preoperative Combined Modality Paclitaxel / Cisplatin / RT or Irinotecan / Cisplatin / RT Followed by Postoperative Chemotherapy With the Same Agents in Operable Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus [NCT00033657]Phase 297 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-15Completed
A Study of Camrelizumab (SHR-1210) Combined With Apatinib Versus Paclitaxel or Irinotecan in Participants With Advanced Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Progressed After First-line Chemotherapy [NCT04342910]Phase 3550 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-21Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of SU011248 (Sutent) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab as a Second Line Regimen for Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer [NCT00361244]Phase 1/Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual)
Randomized Phase II Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) In Patients With Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00003351]Phase 2104 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-08-31Completed
Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin for Patients With Colorectal Carcinoma and Other Refractory Tumors [NCT00004005]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional1998-09-30Completed
Dose Escalation Trial of Docetaxel Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Cancer [NCT00004923]Phase 1/Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-04-30Completed
Phase I Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) and Gemcitabine in Patients With Solid Tumors [NCT00004095]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-08-31Completed
A Phase I-II Study of Hepatic Arterial Therapy Via Pump (Protocol D97-063) With Floxuridine (FUDR) and Dexamethasone (DEX) in Combination With Intravenous Irinotecan as Adjuvant Treatment After Resection of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer [NCT00003753]Phase 20 participants Interventional1998-09-30Completed
UGT1A1 Polymorphism in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Treated With CPT-11 (Irinotecan) [NCT00003843]28 participants (Anticipated)Observational1998-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated due to poor accrual)
Phase I Clinical Study of Every Three Week Irinotecan With Oral Capecitabine Given Twice Daily for Two Weeks Out of Three in Patients With Gastrointestinal and Other Solid Malignancies [NCT00003867]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of CPT-11 and 5-FU/LCV in Patients With Previously Untreated Gastric Adenocarcinoma [NCT00005607]Phase 20 participants Interventional2000-02-29Active, not recruiting
Nordic Multicentre Un-blinded Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Evaluating the Additional Efficacy of Adding Chemotherapy Prior to Resection of a Pancreatic Head Malignancy to Avoid Early Mortality in Those Ultimately Resected [NCT02919787]Phase 2/Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-30Active, not recruiting
FUDR/Oxaliplatin HAI Plus Irinotecan Chemotherapy vs. FOLFOXIRI Chemotherapy in Treating Initially Unresectable CRCLM [NCT03678428]Phase 392 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Production halt of FUDR in China)
Phase Ⅱ Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of mFOLFIRINOX in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in China [NCT02028806]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Phase I Trial of Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy With Nanoliposomal Irinotecan in Patients With Peritoneal Surface Malignancies [NCT04088786]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-22Completed
FOLFOXIRI Chemotherapy Alone as Neoadjuvant Treatment for MRI-defined Circumferential Radial Margin (CRM) Positive Rectal Cancer [NCT03161574]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-11Withdrawn(stopped due to No participants were recruited)
A Phase 2, Open-label, Randomized Clinical Trial of Skin Toxicity Treatment in Subjects Receiving Second-line FOLFIRI or Irinotecan Only Chemotherapy Concomitantly With Panitumumab [NCT00332163]Phase 295 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase I Trial of OXIRI [Oxaliplatin (O), Xeloda (X) and Irinotecan (I)] Treatment in Patients With Advanced and/or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT02368860]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-17Completed
A Randomized Phase II Pilot Study Prospectively Evaluating Treatment for Patients Based on ERCC1(Excision Repair Cross-Complementing 1) for Advanced/Metastatic Esophageal, Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer [NCT01498289]Phase 2213 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Phase II Study of Dose Attenuated Chemotherapy in Patients With Lung Cancer and Age > 70 and/or Comorbidities [NCT05800587]Phase 2280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-22Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of SBRT Followed by Tislelizumab Plus Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Patients With Previously Treated RAS Wild-type Advanced Refractory Colorectal Cancer: a Phase II, Single-arm Study [NCT05799443]Phase 223 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-05Not yet recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Parallel, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Equivalency Clinical Trial of Cetuximab (CinnaGen Co.) Efficacy and Safety Compared With Erbitux (Merck Co.) and FOLFIRI for RAS Wild-type mCRC [NCT03391934]Phase 3234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-20Recruiting
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Surgical Conversion Rate in Patients With RAS Mutation-type Receiving FOLFOXIRI +/- Bevacizumab for Unresectable Colorectal Liver-Limited Metastases [NCT02350530]Phase 2138 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Recruiting
A Multicenter, Single Arm, Open Label Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Health Related Quality of Life of Aflibercept in Combination With Irinotecan/5-FU Chemotherapy (FOLFIRI) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Previously Treated Wit [NCT01670721]Phase 3175 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Lerotinib Versus Investigator's Choice Single-agent Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced/Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and EGFR Overexpression That Progressed After Second-line Therapy:Phase 3 Study [NCT04415853]Phase 3416 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-21Recruiting
FOLFOXIRI in Combination With GM-CSF and IL-2 (FOLFOXIGIL) Versus FOLFOXIRI as First-line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Phase II Trial by the FNF Team. [NCT03222089]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-20Withdrawn(stopped due to Another study enrolling the similar group of patient are ongoing)
An Open-Label, International, Multicenter, Phase 1b Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of IDX-1197 in Combination With XELOX (Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin) or Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT04725994]Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-28Recruiting
Open-label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial to Compare Efficacy of CAPTEM Versus FOLFIRI as Second Line in Patients Progressed on or After First-line Oxaliplatin Chemo for Advanced, MGMT Methylated, RAS Mutated Colorectal Cancer [NCT02414009]Phase 282 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Study of Apatinib Plus Irinotecan as Second-line Treatment in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junctional Adenocarcinoma [NCT03116555]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-04-05Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Talazoparib (BMN 673) Plus Irinotecan With or Without Temozolomide in Children With Refractory or Recurrent Solid Malignancies [NCT02392793]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-25Completed
MAVERICC (Marker Evaluation for Avastin Research in CRC): A Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab+mFOLFOX6 Vs. Bevacizumab+FOLFIRI With Biomarker Stratification in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01374425]Phase 2376 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Randomized Non-comparative Phase II Study of Maintenance Therapy With OSE2101 Plus FOLFIRI, or FOLFIRI After Induction Therapy With FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (TEDOPaM-D17-01 PRODIGE 63 St [NCT03806309]Phase 2106 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-31Recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Cancer (PembroPlus) [NCT02331251]Phase 1/Phase 281 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Terminated(stopped due to PI not longer at site.)
Cetuximab as Salvage Therapy in Patients With Neo Wild-type RAS/RAF Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases. A Proof-of-concept Study [NCT04189055]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-07Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-lable, Parallel-controlled, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Differences of Safety and Efficacy of Irinotecan Liposome Injection-containing Regimens Versus Nab-paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Previously Untreated [NCT05047991]Phase 2153 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-31Not yet recruiting
An Open-label, Single-centre, Single-arm Phase II Study of Triplet Combination of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan (Xeloxiri) as Salvage Therapy in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT03146377]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Sacituzumab Govitecan (IMMU-132) (NSC #820016) for Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases [NCT04647916]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-08Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Selection Study of Ramucirumab and Paclitaxel Versus FOLFIRI in Refractory Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma [NCT04205968]Phase 294 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-01Recruiting
A Single Arm Phase Ib/II Multi-Center Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Nanoliposomal-Irinotecan, 5-Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin as Second Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer [NCT03785873]Phase 1/Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-22Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study of Irinotecan With or Without Simvastatin in Treating Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Relapsed From First-line Chemotherapy [NCT04985201]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase Ib Study to Evaluate Tolerability, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan Hydrochloride Liposome Injection in Combination With 5-FU/LV in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT05086848]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-05Completed
MASTERPLAN: A Randomised Phase II Study of MFOLFIRINOX And Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Pancreatic Cancer With High Risk and Locally Advanced Disease [NCT04089150]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-01Recruiting
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study of SHR-A1811 (HER2-ADC) Compared With the Chemotherapy Treatment Chosen by the Investigators for Subjects With HER2-positive Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastric Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Ad [NCT06123494]Phase 3360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
Phase II Study of Preoperative FOLFIRINOX Followed by Accelerated Short Course Radiation Therapy for Borderline-Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT01591733]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
Multi-center Phase II Trial of Nimotuzumab Plus Irinotecan in Patients With High EGFR Expression After Failure of First-line Treatment in Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma(NIEGA) [NCT03400592]Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Recruiting
An Open-label, Multiple-site, Phase I/II Dose Cohort Trial of [6R] 5,10-Methylene Tetrahydrofolate (Modufolin®) in Combination With a Fixed Dose of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) Alone or Together With a Fixed Dose of Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan in Patients With Sta [NCT02244632]Phase 1/Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Drug-Eluting Bead, Irinotecan (DEBIRI) Therapy of Liver Metastasis From Colon Cancer With Concomitant Systemic Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil and Leucovorin Chemotherapy, and Anti-Angiogenic Therapy [NCT00932438]Phase 1/Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Irinotecan Plus Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and Leucovorin as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Gastric Cancer [NCT04358354]Phase 3388 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-22Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Liposomal-Irinotecan Using Real-Time Imaging With Gadolinium In Patients With Recurrent High Grade Glioma [NCT02022644]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-23Completed
A Phase II Randomized Trial of Irinotecan/Temozolomide With Temsirolimus (NSC# 683864) or Chimeric 14.18 Antibody (Ch14.18) (NSC# 764038) in Children With Refractory, Relapsed or Progressive Neuroblastoma [NCT01767194]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-12Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Study of BMS-813160 in Combination With Chemotherapy or Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT03184870]Phase 1/Phase 2332 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-08Completed
Paediatric Hepatic International Tumour Trial [NCT03017326]Phase 3450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-24Recruiting
Front-line Combination Therapy of Sunitinib Malate Plus Chemotherapy With Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) for Rectal Cancer Patients With Synchronous Non-Resectable Metastases: A Phase II Non Controlled Study. (SUREMETS) [NCT00936832]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to because the sunitinib showed futility in anotehr trial)
A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GS-6624 Combined With FOLFIRI as Second Line Treatment for Metastatic KRAS Mutant Colorectal Adenocarcinoma That Has Progressed Following a First Line Oxal [NCT01479465]Phase 2266 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated
Cetuximab and Envafolimab Plus mFOLFOXIRI Versus Cetuximab Plus mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI as First-line Treatment for RAS/BRAF Wild-type, MSS, Unresectable Left-side Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Phase II Trial (CEIL) [NCT05959356]Phase 2198 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-09Active, not recruiting
A Phase II, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Cadonilimab in Combination With FOLFOXIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Therapy for Metastatic MSS Colorectal Cancer. [NCT05839470]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-19Recruiting
NeoOPTIMIZE: An Open-Label, Phase II Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Adaptive Switching of FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel as a Neoadjuvant Strategy for Patients With Resectable and Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic C [NCT04539808]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-27Recruiting
A Phase 3 Multi-institutional Study for Treatment of Children With Newly Diagnosed Hepatoblastoma Using a Modified PHITT Strategy Incorporating a Randomized Assessment of Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotection for Children With Localized Disease, and Respons [NCT04478292]Phase 3330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
A Phase I Study of SGI-110 Combined With Irinotecan Followed by a Randomized Phase II Study of SGI-110 Combined With Irinotecan Versus Regorafenib or TAS-102 in Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients [NCT01896856]Phase 1/Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-23Completed
A Phase 3 Study of BBI-608 in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in Adult Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC). [NCT02753127]Phase 31,253 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
A Phase Ib/II Clinical Study of BBI608 in Combination With Standard Chemotherapies in Adult Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer [NCT02024607]Phase 1/Phase 2495 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy & Tolerability of Aprepitant and Palonosetron for the Prevention of CINV in Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Patients Receiving FOLFOX [NCT00381862]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase I, Randomised, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Two-Treatment, Two-Way Crossover, Two-Stage Study to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Onivyde (Irinotecan Liposome Injection) Manufactured at Two Different Sites Administered in Combination With Anti-Cancer Ag [NCT05383352]Phase 1122 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-30Recruiting
A Phase 1b Multi-cohort Study of the Combination of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Binimetinib Alone or the Combination of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy With or Without Binimetinib in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (KEYNOTE-651) [NCT03374254]Phase 1114 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-16Completed
Phase 2 Study of Etirinotecan Pegol (NKTR-102) in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic and Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) After Failure of 2nd Line Treatment [NCT01773109]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Phase II Trial for Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Treated With Gliadel Followed by Avastin Plus Irinotecan [NCT00735436]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study enrollment was halted due to slow accrual.)
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy With or Without Epigenetic Priming in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT01935947]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Terminated
A Phase I/II Multi Centre Single Arm, Open Label Study of Intraparenchymal Therapy With Irinotecan Hydrochloride Drug-eluting Beads (CM-BC2) as a Adjunct Therapy to Best Standard of Care in Patients With Recurrent, Surgically Resectable High Grade Glioma [NCT02481960]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-21Terminated(stopped due to The decision to terminate the trial was based on the slow rate of recruitment across the programme of studies])
Chemotherapy Combined With Apatinib and PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody for Second-line or Above Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer-A Prospective, Single-arm, Open, Phase II Study [NCT05025033]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-30Completed
Phase I/II Study of Irinotecan and Temsirolimus in Patients With Refractory Sarcomas [NCT00996346]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Original PI left institution and sponsor decided to end support.)
Randomized Phase II Trial of Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid With or Without Liposomal Irinotecan (ONIVYDE) for Patients With Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Which Progressed Following Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin [NCT03524508]Phase 2178 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-04Completed
Systemic Chemotherapy With Irinotecan Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion With Floxuridine and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Prospective Study [NCT03493061]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-01Completed
A Phase III Open-label, Multicenter Trial of Avelumab (MSB0010718C) as a Third-line Treatment of Unresectable, Recurrent, or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma [NCT02625623]Phase 3371 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-28Completed
A Pilot Study of SGT-53 in Conjunction With Irradiation and Chemotherapy in Children With Recurrent or Progressive CNS Malignancies [NCT03554707]Early Phase 16 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
Phase II Clinical Study on Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor Combined With Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI Regimen in the Second-line Treatment of Unresectable Recurrent or Metastatic MSI-H Colorectal Cancer [NCT05035381]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Recruiting
An Open-label, Multicentre, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Irinotecan Liposome Injection in Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer [NCT05009953]Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-30Not yet recruiting
Phase 2 Trial of 5-Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin and Liposomal Irinotecan and Immunotherapy (Plus Trastuzumab for HER2-positive Disease) During 1st Line Treatment of Advanced Esophageal and Gastric Adenocarcinoma [NCT04150640]Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-13Recruiting
EFFIPEC - Efficacy of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy, Single-arm Phase I Study, Followed by an Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Registry-based Phase III Trial [NCT04861558]Phase 3356 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-01Recruiting
An Open-Label, Multicenter, First-in-Human, Phase 1 Dose-Escalation and Multicohort Expansion Study of INBRX-109 in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Including Sarcomas [NCT03715933]Phase 1240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-10Recruiting
The Efficacy and Safety of Toripalimab Combined With Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Advanced MSI-H or dMMR Colorectal Cancer: an Open-label, Multicenter, Single-arm, Phase Ib/II Study [NCT04988191]Phase 1/Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-24Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of CPT-11 in Patients With Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction Incorporating Pretreatment and Posttreatment Biopsies for Evaluation of Tumor Thymidylate Synthase, MIB-1, Topoisomerase I, and p53 [NCT00003137]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-12-31Completed
Phase II and Pharmacokinetic Study of CPT-11 and Trastuzumab (RhuMab HER2, Herceptin) in Advanced Colo-Rectal Cancer With p185 HER 2 Overexpression [NCT00003995]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Systemic Therapy With CPT-11 (Camptosar HCl) and Cisplatin in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer to be Followed by Surgical Resection and Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy [NCT00004103]Phase 20 participants Interventional1998-07-31Completed
Phase II Randomized Trial of Gemcitabine/Docetaxel and Gemcitabine/Irinotecan in Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00004139]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Taxotere and Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Patients With Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Lower Esophagus, Esophagogastric Junction, and Gastric Cardia [NCT00004235]Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Completed
A Trial of Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00004919]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-12-31Completed
Raltitrexed Combined With Irinotecan (SALIRI) Based Regimen as First-line Treatment for Advanced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) : an Open-label, Multi-center, and Prospective Study [NCT05160896]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-12Recruiting
Phase II Evaluation of Irinotecan (CPT-11) in Previously Treated Advanced Sarcomas [NCT00003719]Phase 227 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1997-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Single Agent Topoisomerase-I Inhibitor Polymer Conjugate, Etirinotecan Pegol (NKTR-102), in Patients With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT01876446]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-29Completed
Phase II Trial of Cetuximab Plus Cisplatin and Irinotecan in Patients With Irinotecan and Cisplatin-Refractory Metastatic Esophageal and Gastric Cancer [NCT00397904]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Pharmacogenetic-Based Dosing of Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, and Capecitabine as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma [NCT00433550]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Impact of Tumor and Stromal Subtypes on Efficacy of Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Subjects With Non-Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03977233]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-12Recruiting
Investigation of Association Between UGT1A1 Polymorphisms and Irinotecan Toxicity in Korean Patients With Advanced Colorectal or Gastric Cancer Treated With FOLFIRI Regimen [NCT01271582]Phase 41,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter Phase 1 Study of Intravenous Administration of REOLYSIN® (Reovirus Type 3 Dearing) in Combination With Irinotecan/Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) and Bevacizumab in FOLFIRI Naive Patients With KRAS Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01274624]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study to Investigate the Deepness of Response of FOLFOXIRI Plus Cetuximab (Erbitux) Versus FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab as the First-line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With RAS Wild-type Tumors: DEEPER [NCT02515734]Phase 2360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Radiotherapy Combined With Raltitrexed and Irinotecan(CPT-11) in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Colorectal Cancer [NCT04499586]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Active, not recruiting
Mechanistic and Pharmacokinetic Studies of Classical Chinese Formula Xiao Chai Hu Tang Against Irinotecan-Induced Gut Toxicities(Clinical Study Part:Run-in Safety Study) [NCT04926545]24 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-16Recruiting
Randomized Double-Blind Phase III Trial of Vitamin D3 Supplementation in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (SOLARIS) [NCT04094688]Phase 3455 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-30Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Hu3F8, Irinotecan/Temozolomide and Sargramostim (HITS) Chemoimmunotherapy for High-Risk Neuroblastoma [NCT03189706]Early Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-12Active, not recruiting
Genotype-Directed Phase II Study Of Higher Dose Of Irinotecan In First-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Folfiri Plus Bevacizumab [NCT02138617]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of S-1, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin in Locally-Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (SIROX Study) - Followed by Curative Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy [NCT03316326]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Oral ABT-888 (NSC #737664) Plus Intravenous Irinotecan (CPT-11, NSC#616348) Administered in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00576654]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-12-05Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Gastric, Gastro-esophageal Junction, and Esophageal Tumors [NCT01928290]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-08Completed
Study With High Doses of Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy and Consolidation Therapy With Ciclofosfamide and Anticyclooxygenase 2, for the Metastatic Ewing Sarcoma [NCT02727387]Phase 2155 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-01Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled, Multi-Center, Phase III Clinical Study of Anti-PD-1 Antibody SHR-1210 vs. Investigator's Choice of Chemotherapy in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Cancer [NCT03099382]Phase 3457 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-05Completed
Open Label Randomized Bioequivalence Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic and Safety Profile of Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92) vs Bevacizumab (AVASTIN®), Both With FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, in First-line Treatment for mCRC Patients [NCT02069704]Phase 1142 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-29Completed
The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: A Randomized Phase II Trial Testing The Efficacy of Triplet Versus Doublet Chemotherapy to Achieve Clinical Complete Response in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [NCT05610163]Phase 2312 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-08Recruiting
A Pilot Single Arm Trial With Sacituzumab Govitecan as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pts With Non-Urothelial Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer [NCT05581589]Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-15Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Neoadjuvant NIS793 in Combination With mFOLFIRINOX in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [NCT05546411]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-06Terminated(stopped due to Novartis, the drug manufacturer of NIS793, notified Dana Farber Cancer Institute that they are stopping all clinical development of NIS793 in pancreatic cancer, effective immediately.)
Phase II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SI-B001 Combined With Irinotecan in the Treatment of Recurrent and Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma [NCT05022654]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-13Recruiting
A Phase III Trial of Perioperative Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT04340141]Phase 3352 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
A Phase I, Open-Label, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of RRx-001 in Combination With Irinotecan in Metastatic or Advanced Cancer Patients Without Life-Prolonging Therapies of Demonstrated Clinical Benefit (PAYLOAD) [NCT02801097]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-30Terminated(stopped due to Sufficient patients enrolled to end study)
A Phase I Clinical Trial to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose and to Assess the Safety of OratecanTM in Combination With Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Solid Cancer [NCT01463982]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
An Open, Multicenter, Phase Ib/II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of CT041 Autologous CAR T-cell Injection in Patients With Advanced Gastric/ Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma and Pancreatic Cancer [NCT04581473]Phase 1/Phase 2192 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-23Recruiting
NANT 2011- 01: Randomized Phase II Pick the Winner Study of 131I-MIBG, 131I-MIBG With Vincristine and Irinotecan, or 131I-MIBG With Vorinostat for Resistant/Relapsed Neuroblastoma [NCT02035137]Phase 2114 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II Trial of CT-322 (BMS-844203) Plus Irinotecan, 5-FU and Leucovorin (FOLFIRI) Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00851045]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A Phase Ib/II Study of AK104#PD-1 / CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody# and AK117#Anti-CD47 Antibody# in Combination With or Without Chemotherapy in Advanced Malignant Tumors [NCT05235542]Phase 1/Phase 2130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-12Recruiting
Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI Chemotherapy in Resectable Liver Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer:an Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter Phase II Study [NCT03487939]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-01Recruiting
Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI (Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil) Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Colon Cancer:an Open-label, Single-arm, Multicenter Phase II Study [NCT03484195]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-01Recruiting
A Phase I/IIa, Open-label, Multi-center Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of the ATR Kinase Inhibitor ART0380 Administered Orally as Monotherapy and in Combination to Patients With Advanced or Metastatic S [NCT04657068]Phase 1/Phase 2242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-13Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Trifluridine/Tipiracil in Combination With Irinotecan in Biliary Tract Cancers [NCT04072445]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-18Completed
An Investigator Sponsored Phase 1a/1b Trial of Selinexor in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Adenocarcinoma of Stomach and Distal Esophagus [NCT02283359]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Principal Investigator left the institution)
[NCT00057473]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-02-28Completed
"A Phase II Study of Liposomial IrinoTecan (Nal-IRI) With 5-Fluorouracil, Levofolinic Acid and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer nITRo Trial" [NCT03528785]Phase 267 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-02Recruiting
High-Risk Neuroblastoma Study 2 of SIOP-Europa-Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN) [NCT04221035]Phase 3800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-05Recruiting
A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Study of Radiotherapy Combined With Tislelizumab and Irinotecan in MSS/pMMR Inoperable Recurrence and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT05160727]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-01Recruiting
Phase II Clinical Study of Camrelizumab Combined With Chemotherapy or Anlotinib in Second-line or Above Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Previously Treated With First-line Immunotherapy [NCT05322499]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-15Not yet recruiting
Phase I Study of Combination Therapy With S-1, Irinotecan, and Bevacizumab as 1-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer. [NCT03380689]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-05Withdrawn(stopped due to There is no fund to support it)
A Clinical Study of Exploring Camrelizumab in the Treatment of Colorectal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma(MAC) [NCT04446091]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
A Rollover Study to Provide Continued Access to Napabucasin for Patients Enrolled in Boston Biomedical-sponsored Napabucasin Protocols [NCT04299880]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-24Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Pevonedistat (MLN4924), a NEDD8 Activating Enzyme (NAE) Inhibitor, in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan in Pediatric Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT03323034]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-11Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase 3 Study of Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC) Alternating With Vincristine and Irinotecan (VI) Versus VAC/VI Plus Temsirolimus (TORI, Torisel, NSC# 683864) in Patients With Intermediate Risk (IR) Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) [NCT02567435]Phase 3321 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-01Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Phase Ib/II Study of FOLFIRI Alone Versus FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Versus FOLFIRI Plus E7820 as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01133990]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-04Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early as the combination of E7820 and FOLFIRI was deemed to be not tolerable, hence no efficacy analysis was conducted.)
A Phase I/II Study of ISIS 183750 in Combination With Irinotecan in Irinotecan-refractory Colorectal Cancer [NCT01675128]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotheraphy (Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel vs. mFOLFIRINOX) and Sterotatic Body Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02241551]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated with the IRB ended early as logistical concerns of the SBRT)
FOLFOX Via Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy (HAI) Plus Systemic Irinotecan With or Without Bevacizumab Versus Systemic FOLFOXIRI With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Initially Unresectable RAS-mutated Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases: A [NCT05727163]Phase 2194 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-29Recruiting
Combination Therapy of Rucaparib and Irinotecan in Cancers With Mutations in DNA Repair [NCT03318445]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-12Completed
A Randomized, Double-blinded, Multicenter, Phase III Clinical Study of HX008 (Recombinant Humanized Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody Injection) Plus Irinotecan Versus Placebo Plus Irinotecan as Second-line Treatment in Advanced Gastric Cancer [NCT04486651]Phase 3560 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-16Recruiting
Steam (Sequencing Triplet With Avastin and Maintenance): FOLFOXIRI/Bevacizumab Regimens (Concurrent and Sequential) vs. FOLFOX/Bevacizumab in First-Line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT01765582]Phase 2280 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-23Terminated
A Pilot Study of Molecular Profile-Directed Chemotherapy for Metastatic HER2(-) Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma [NCT02358863]13 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Issues with recruitment.)
Phase II Trial of FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02497157]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-21Completed
A Phase I/II Dose Escalation/Dose Expansion Study of Prexasertib in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Relapsed or RefractoryDesmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor and Rhabdomyosarcoma [NCT04095221]Phase 1/Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-17Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled Phase II Study to Compare Irinotecan Combined With Cisplatin (IP) Versus Etoposide Combined With Cisplatin (EP) in Advanced and Metastatic Gastrointestinal Pancreatic and Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma [NCT03168594]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-29Terminated(stopped due to The enrollment was terminated early because the premature analysis found similar response in the two arms.)
A Study of Preoperative FOLFIRINOX For Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer [NCT03167112]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-03Recruiting
A Pilot, Non-Randomized Phase II Protocol of Irinotecan for Patients With Previously Treated, Advanced, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With High ISG 15 Expression [NCT01607554]Phase 1/Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Inadequate enrollment (2 subjects in 4 years))
A Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma With Tissue Collection [NCT02178709]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-03Completed
An Australian Translational Study to Evaluate the Prognostic Role of Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Bevacizumab (Avastin™) [NCT01588990]Phase 4128 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-26Completed
Randomized Phase II Study of Irinotecan and Cetuximab With or Without Vemurafenib in BRAF Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT02164916]Phase 2106 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Potential of Concomitant Ramucirumab to Affect the Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 When Coadministered With Folinic Acid and 5 Fluorouracil in Patients With Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors [NCT01634555]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00022698 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00022698 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Complete Response
NCT00022698 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Response
NCT00022698 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With One-year Survival
NCT00022698 (9) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00022698 (9) [back to overview]Time To Objective Response
NCT00022698 (9) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00022698 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Deaths
NCT00022698 (9) [back to overview]Tumor Response Rate Based on Tumor Measurement as Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.0 (RECIST 1.0)
NCT00033657 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival Time
NCT00033657 (3) [back to overview]Recurrence-free Survival Time
NCT00033657 (3) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Rate
NCT00042939 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Objective Response Evaluated by RECIST (Solid Tumor Response Criteria)
NCT00042939 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00042939 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00042939 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Thromboembolic Events
NCT00042939 (5) [back to overview]Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Status
NCT00045162 (4) [back to overview]Confirmed and Unconfirmed Complete and Partial Responses.
NCT00045162 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00045162 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00045162 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With a Given Type and Grade of Adverse Event.
NCT00057837 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00057837 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Objective Response by Solid Tumor Response Criteria (RECIST)
NCT00057837 (3) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00061932 (2) [back to overview]Change in Patterns of Gene Expression Pre- and Post-treatment Performed by GeneChip Analysis
NCT00061932 (2) [back to overview]True Response Rate Evaluated for the Combination of Irinotecan and PS341 by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00062374 (2) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT00062374 (2) [back to overview]Histological Response Determined by FDG Uptake Correlates
NCT00066781 (3) [back to overview]Confirmed Response Rate (Partial or Complete Response for 2 Consecutive Evaluations at Least 4 Weeks Apart) as Measured by RECIST Criteria
NCT00066781 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00066781 (3) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00068692 (4) [back to overview]3-year Disease Free Survival
NCT00068692 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Sphincter Preservation
NCT00068692 (4) [back to overview]3-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT00068692 (4) [back to overview]Failure Pattern
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)
NCT00079274 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3+ Treatment-related Adverse Events
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Second Primary Rate at 4 Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Rate
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Two Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Completion of Post-operative Chemotherapy
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Completion of Chemoradiation
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Two Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Two Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Post-operative Chemotherapy
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Local-regional Failure Rate at 4 Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival Rate at 4 Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Distant Failure Rate at 4 Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Completion of Chemoradiation
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3+ Treatment-related Adverse Events Preoperatively
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Survival Rate at 4 Years
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3+ Treatment-related Adverse Events Postoperatively
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Completion of Chemoradiation
NCT00081289 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Completion of Post-operative Chemotherapy
NCT00084617 (3) [back to overview]Response Rates (RR) in Metastatic Gastric/GE Junction Tumors
NCT00084617 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00084617 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) Duration
NCT00098787 (3) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00098787 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00098787 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Time to Progression: FOLFIRI, mIFL and CapeIRI
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Time to Progression : Celecoxib and Placebo
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Time to Progression: Bevacizumab With FOLFIRI, mIFL
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Survival Time: FOLFIRI, mIFL and CapeIRI
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) at Primary Completion: FOLFIRI and mIFL
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Overall Relative Dose Intensity of Irinotecan
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Survival Time: Celecoxib and Placebo
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Survival Time at Last Follow-Up Visit: Bevacizumab With FOLFIRI, mIFL
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Overall Response: FOLFIRI, mIFL and CapeIRI
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Overall Response: Celecoxib and Placebo
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Overall Response: Bevacizumab With FOLFIRI, mIFL
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]Dose Reduction Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]1 Year Survival: FOLFIRI, mIFL and CapeIRI
NCT00101686 (14) [back to overview]1 Year Survival: Bevacizumab With FOLFIRI, mIFL
NCT00103259 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate on Step 2
NCT00103259 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival on Step 1
NCT00103259 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival on Step 1
NCT00103259 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate on Step 1
NCT00109850 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00109850 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response (Confirmed and Unconfined, Complete and Partial)
NCT00109850 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00109850 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 2 Years
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RPIID) of Cetuximab in Combination With Irinotecan
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Dose-Limiting Toxicity
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at Steady State Corrected for Body Surface Area (VSS/BSA)
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Human Anti-cetuximab Antibody (HACA) Response
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Hypomagnesemia
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Tumor Response
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve, Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC[INF])
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Clearance Corrected for Body Surface Area (CL/BSA)
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Number of Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Leukopenia
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Neutropenia
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Thrombocytopenia
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT00110357 (14) [back to overview]Terminal Half-Life (T-Half)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Time (Part 2)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Time (Part 1)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Objective Tumor Response (Part 1)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Diarrhea (Part 2)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Diarrhea (Part 1)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Time to Initial Objective Tumor Response (Part 1)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Died (Part 2)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Survival Time (Part 1)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Objective Tumor Response (Part 2)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (Part 1)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression (Part 2)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression (Part 1)
NCT00111761 (13) [back to overview]Survival Time (Part 2)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (Oxaliplatin)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate (Irinotecan)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (Oxaliplatin)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate (Mutant KRAS)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate (Wild-type KRAS)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Time to Progression (Oxaliplatin)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Time to Progression (Irinotecan)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (Wild-type KRAS)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Wild-type KRAS)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Oxaliplatin)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (Mutant KRAS)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate (Oxaliplatin)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Mutant KRAS)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Irinotecan)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (Irinotecan)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Through Week 12 (Irinotecan)
NCT00115765 (17) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (Irinotecan)
NCT00127036 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00136955 (4) [back to overview]Response to Treatment Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria (Evaluable Population)
NCT00136955 (4) [back to overview]Response to Treatment Based on RECIST Criteria (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Population)
NCT00136955 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) and Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) (Evaluable Population)
NCT00136955 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) and Time to Tumor Progression (ITT Population)
NCT00143403 (2) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT00143403 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rates
NCT00143455 (5) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
NCT00143455 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00143455 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Response
NCT00143455 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP)
NCT00143455 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) Population
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Quality of Life Assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QOL) Assessment European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Global Health Status
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Safety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse Event
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Participants With No Residual Tumor After Metastatic Surgery
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Time (Chinese V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population)
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival Time (KRAS Wild-Type Population)
NCT00154102 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival Time (OS)
NCT00183872 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00183872 (2) [back to overview]Objective Response (Complete, Partial, Stable and Progression)
NCT00191984 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00191984 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00191984 (5) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00191984 (5) [back to overview]Best Overall Tumor Response
NCT00191984 (5) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00193375 (3) [back to overview]2-Year Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00193375 (3) [back to overview]Number of Grade 3/4 Toxicities Patients Experienced on Maintenance Bevacizumab Following Chemoradiation for Limited Stage - Small Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC)
NCT00193375 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00193596 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS), the Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Death
NCT00193596 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS), the Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease
NCT00210184 (3) [back to overview]2-month Response Rate
NCT00210184 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00210184 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00216086 (3) [back to overview]Disease-Free Survival
NCT00216086 (3) [back to overview]Local and Distant Disease Recurrence Rates
NCT00216086 (3) [back to overview]Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate
NCT00240097 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Part I)
NCT00240097 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (Part I)
NCT00240097 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (Part I)
NCT00248287 (4) [back to overview]Median Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00248287 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00248287 (4) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00248287 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rates (ORR)
NCT00265850 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00265850 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00276744 (1) [back to overview]6-month Overall Survival
NCT00311584 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response - Complete Response (CR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) and Partial Response (PR)
NCT00316862 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Experiencing Grade 3 or Greater Hematologic and Non-hematologic Toxicity
NCT00316862 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Adenocarcinoma Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response (CR) After Surgery
NCT00316862 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Experiencing Grade 3 or Greater Pneumonitis or Esophagitis
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Response Rate at First Scheduled Assessment
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Rate
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicity of Any Type During the 6-week Skin Treatment Period
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Specific Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicities During the 6-week Skin Treatment Period
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Most Severe Specific Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicities of Interest
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Rate of Disease Control at First Scheduled Assessment
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Dermatologic Quality of Life Index (DLQI) Score
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Time to First Occurrence of Specific Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicities of Interest
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Time to First Most Severe Specific Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicities of Interest
NCT00332163 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Panitumumab Dose Reductions Due to the Specific Skin Toxicities of Interest
NCT00335556 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity Rate
NCT00335556 (6) [back to overview]Long-term Survival of Patients With Stage I-IV Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors
NCT00335556 (6) [back to overview]Event Free Survival Probability
NCT00335556 (6) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival of Patients With Diffuse Anaplastic Wilms' Tumor (DAWT)
NCT00335556 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With INI1 Mutations in Renal and Extrarenal Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor by Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization
NCT00335556 (6) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00336856 (3) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00336856 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate (RR)
NCT00336856 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00354679 (1) [back to overview]Evaluation of Safety and Toxicity
NCT00354744 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Event Free at 4 Years Following Study Entry
NCT00354744 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Complete or Partial Response Assessed by RECIST Criteria
NCT00354744 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events Due to Concurrent Therapy
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Incidence of Toxicity
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Local Failure
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Incidence of Toxicity Related to VI Treatment in Patients With UGT1A1 Genotype
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VAC
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Response Rate (RR)
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Incidence of Bladder Dysfunction
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS) by PAX Status
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 4
NCT00354835 (13) [back to overview]Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 15
NCT00354978 (1) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00360828 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 6 Months
NCT00360828 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 12 Months
NCT00360828 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Objective Response After 3 Cycles of Treatment
NCT00361842 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST Version 1.0
NCT00361842 (3) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR) Per RECIST Version 1.0
NCT00361842 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.0
NCT00381706 (5) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure in Patients With Adenocarcinoma
NCT00381706 (5) [back to overview]Tumor Response Rate (Complete and Partial) in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT00381706 (5) [back to overview]Response Rate (Complete and Partial) in Patients With Measurable Esophageal or GE Junction Adenocarcinoma
NCT00381706 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival in Patients With Adenocarcinoma
NCT00381706 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Patients With Adenocarcinoma
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Descriptive Statistics for the Change of Perfusion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Concurrently Measured With the Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Number of Patients With High VEGF-A Expression at Baseline
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Sustained Objective Responses
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Correlation of the Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) From Baseline With the Change in Perfusion From Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) From Baseline to Day-15
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Change in Perfusion Ratio Between the Baseline and Day 15 Brain Imaging
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Change in Diffusion Ratio Between the Baseline and Day 15 Brain Image
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Association of Log-transformed Volume of Cystic Necrosis With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Association of Log-transformed Tumor Volume Based on FLAIR With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Association of Log-transformed Tumor Enhancing Volume With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Association of Log-transformed Tumor Diffusion Ratio With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Number of Study Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Treatment-related Toxicity
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Terminal Half-life
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Systemic Clearance
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Sustained Disease Stabilization Rate Associated With Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Low-grade Glioma (Stratum E)
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by VEGF-R2 Expression
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by VEGF-A Expression
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by Hypoxia Inducible Factor-2alpha Expression
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by Carbonic Anhydrase 9 (CA9) Expression
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate Sustained for ≥ 8 Weeks
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Number of Patients With High VEGF-R2 Expression at Baseline
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Number of Patients With High Hypoxia Inducible Factor-2alpha Expression at Baseline
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Number of Patients With High Carbonic Anhydrase 9 Expression at Baseline
NCT00381797 (26) [back to overview]Descriptive Statistics for the Changes in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) Concurrently Measured With the Changes in Perfusion From Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT00381862 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With no Emesis and no Rescue Therapy Within 5 Days of Receiving FOLFOX and FOLFIRI in the First Cycle of Chemotherapy.
NCT00387660 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Toxicity
NCT00387660 (3) [back to overview]Median Survival of Patients Treated With This Regimen
NCT00387660 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00391586 (1) [back to overview]Toxicity Profile
NCT00393094 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Toxicity as Measured by The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria v. 3.0.
NCT00393094 (4) [back to overview]Radiographic Response Rate (Anaplastic Glioma Participants)
NCT00393094 (4) [back to overview]Radiographic Response Rate (Glioblastoma Multiforme Participants)
NCT00393094 (4) [back to overview]Radiographic Response Rate (Malignant Glioma Participants)
NCT00394433 (4) [back to overview]10-month Progression-Free Survival Rate
NCT00394433 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00394433 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT00394433 (4) [back to overview]Best Response
NCT00397904 (1) [back to overview]Complete and Partial Response Rate
NCT00404495 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response of Complete Response or Partial Response, Investigator's Assessment
NCT00404495 (6) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT00404495 (6) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)
NCT00404495 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response of Complete Response or Partial Response
NCT00404495 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00404495 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00412542 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Progression Free at 6 Months With Malignant Gliomas
NCT00418938 (7) [back to overview]Disease Control
NCT00418938 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00418938 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00418938 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00418938 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00418938 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00418938 (7) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT00433381 (8) [back to overview]Accuracy of Local PFS 6-mo Interpretation Using Central Review PFS-6 as the Reference Standard
NCT00433381 (8) [back to overview]Change in Perfusion MRI Markers at Week 8 as Predictors of 12mo Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00433381 (8) [back to overview]Change in Perfusion MRI Markers at Week 2 as Predictors of 12mo Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00433381 (8) [back to overview]Change in Perfusion MRI Markers at Week 16 as Predictors of 12mo Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00433381 (8) [back to overview]Count/Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months for Bevacizumab and Temozolomide Arm
NCT00433381 (8) [back to overview]Count/Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months for Bevacizumab and Irinotecan Hydrochloride Arm
NCT00433381 (8) [back to overview]Count/Percentage of Patients Discontinuing Treatment Due to Treatment-related Medical Complications(Bevacizumab and Temozolomide Arm)
NCT00433381 (8) [back to overview]Agreement Between Local Interpretation and Central Interpretation of Standard MRI
NCT00433550 (5) [back to overview]Confirmed Tumor Response Rate (Proportion of Participants With Complete Response)
NCT00433550 (5) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00433550 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00433550 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00433550 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00437268 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Tumor Response Rate)
NCT00437268 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months (PFS Rate)
NCT00437268 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Who Died
NCT00437268 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control Rate)
NCT00437268 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00437268 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00449163 (4) [back to overview]Rate of Toxicity in Study Participants
NCT00449163 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)
NCT00449163 (4) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival in Months
NCT00449163 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival up to 2 Years
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) EQ-5D Self-Report Questionnaire
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Confirmed Objective Response
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (EQ-VAS)
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MDASI-GI Symptom Interference Score
NCT00457691 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Monroe Dunaway (MD) Anderson Symptom Assessment Inventory of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (MDASI-GI) Symptom Intensity Score
NCT00467142 (2) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response
NCT00467142 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants in Objective Response (Partial or Complete Responses)
NCT00469898 (4) [back to overview]Patient Response
NCT00469898 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00469898 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00469898 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events
NCT00499369 (2) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00499369 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00544778 (1) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00551213 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00551213 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE
NCT00551213 (6) [back to overview]Best Overall Tumor Response Per Investigator Review
NCT00551213 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Tumor Growth Rate
NCT00551213 (6) [back to overview]Best Overall Tumor Response Per Central Review
NCT00551213 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a >20% Decrease in Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-Assessed Tumor Glucose Metabolism: Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in the Target Lesion
NCT00551421 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00551421 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00551421 (4) [back to overview]Recommended Phase II Dose of Pertuzumab When Administered in Combination With Cetuximab (Phase I)
NCT00551421 (4) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate Defined as the Proportion of Patients With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR, Per RECIST Criteria (Phase II)
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Immunogenicity Assessment: Number of Participants With Positive Sample(s) in the Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay and in the Neutralizing Anti-drug Antibodies (NAb) Assay
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)
NCT00561470 (5) [back to overview]Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on the Tumor Assessment by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) Criteria
NCT00563316 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00563316 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan
NCT00563316 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Irinotecan
NCT00563316 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From the Time of Dosing to Infinity (AUCinf) for Irinotecan
NCT00588900 (1) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Who Are Progression-free at 12 Weeks From the Start of Second-line Therapy
NCT00590031 (2) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response
NCT00590031 (2) [back to overview]Evaluate Toxicity and Tolerability Including Surgical Morbidity and Mortality
NCT00597402 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing a Grade ≥ 4 Hematologic or Grade ≥ 3 Non-hematologic Toxicity
NCT00597402 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing a Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemorrhage or a Systemic Hemorrhage
NCT00597402 (4) [back to overview]16-month Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00597402 (4) [back to overview]12-month Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00598975 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Overall Response
NCT00598975 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities
NCT00598975 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities by NCI-CTCAE
NCT00614393 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Have a Clinical or Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 to 5 Toxicity
NCT00614393 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Have a Drug-related Clinical or Laboratory CTCAE Grade 3 to 5 Toxicity
NCT00614393 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00614393 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Dalotuzumab in Combination With Cetuximab + Irinotecan Versus ORR of Cetuximab + Irinotecan Alone in Participants With Wild Type of Colorectal Cancer
NCT00614393 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE
NCT00614393 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00614393 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience an AE of Infusion Site Reaction
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MDASI-D Symptom Interference Score at Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of Every Odd-numbered Cycle Throughout the Study and End of Treatment (Cycle 65) or Withdrawal
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in MD Anderson Symptoms Inventory Diarrhea (MDASI-D) Symptom Severity Score at Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of Every Odd-numbered Cycle Throughout the Study and End of Treatment (Cycle 65) or Withdrawal
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00615056 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00617539 (5) [back to overview]Overall Time of Survival
NCT00617539 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Objective Treatment Response (Complete or Partial) in the CNS
NCT00617539 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Whose Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) Decreased From >5 to <5 CTCs Per 7.5 mL
NCT00617539 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing a Clinical Benefit
NCT00617539 (5) [back to overview]Time to First Progression in CNS
NCT00639769 (2) [back to overview]Patient Response
NCT00639769 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Each Worst-grade Toxicity
NCT00642746 (3) [back to overview]Response Rates of Radiographically Measurable Disease
NCT00642746 (3) [back to overview]Time to Second Progression (From Start of First-Line Regimen)
NCT00642746 (3) [back to overview]Second-line Progression Free Survival
NCT00655499 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00655499 (4) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT00655499 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00655499 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) During the Combination Therapy Phase
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Sunitinib
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events According to Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE).
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DR)
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) and Predose Concentration (Ctrough) of Sunitinib.
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC Last) and Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC ∞) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC 0-24) of Sunitinib
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Css) of 5-FU
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Presented Objective Response: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Clearance of Irinotecan
NCT00668863 (15) [back to overview]Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Sunitinib
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Associations Between MTHFR Diplotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Poor Risk Group)
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Associations Between MTHFR Genotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Associations Between MTHFR Genotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Associations Between MTHFR Genotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Poor Risk Group)
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Associations Between MTHFR Haplotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Associations Between MTHFR Haplotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Poor Risk Group)
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Toxicities by Genotype Group (Good Risk Versus Poor Risk)
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Rate of Tumor Downstaging Compared With Historical Controls.
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Complete Response Rates
NCT00682786 (12) [back to overview]Associations Between MTHFR Diplotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)
NCT00693719 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00693719 (2) [back to overview]Median Time to Progression
NCT00695292 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT00695292 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Related Toxicity
NCT00695292 (5) [back to overview]One-year Survival, The Percentage of Patients Who Are Alive One Year After Completing Protocol Treatment
NCT00695292 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR), the Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment
NCT00695292 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]Overall Response (OR)
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D FACTG: FACT-G Total Score (PWB+SWB+EWB+FWB)
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]Circulating Tumor DNA - Percentage of Patients With DNA Mutations
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Grade 2-4 Toxicities
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]Uridine Diphosphate Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 Alleles
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-Fatigue FS: Fatigue Score
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D TOI: Trial Outcome Index
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D SWB: Social Well-Being
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D FWB: Functional Well-Being
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D EWB: Emotional Well-Being
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D - PWB: Physical Well-Being
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (Diarrhea) FACIT-D Total Score
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]Metabolites and Cytokine Scoring for Prediction of Time to Disease Progression
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]Clinical Response (CR)
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]Circulating Tumor DNA - Percentage of Patients With DNA Mutations
NCT00730158 (17) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00735436 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade ≥ 4 Hematologic and ≥ Grade 3 Non-hematologic Toxicities
NCT00735436 (6) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00735436 (6) [back to overview]24-week Overall Survival
NCT00735436 (6) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00735436 (6) [back to overview]Incidence and Severity of Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemorrhage
NCT00735436 (6) [back to overview]24-week Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00737438 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response Will be Characterized by the Patient's FDG-PET Scan
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete or Major Histopathological Response
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.0
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following Curative Resection
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to First Resective Surgery
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) Tumor
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death or Disease Progression
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Histopathological Response
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complications Related to Second Resective Surgery
NCT00778102 (14) [back to overview]Time to Resection
NCT00836277 (5) [back to overview]Response Rate (RR)
NCT00836277 (5) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT00836277 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00836277 (5) [back to overview]1-year (Overall) Survival Rate
NCT00836277 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00838578 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and Other (Non-Serious) Adverse Events According to the CTCAE v.3.0
NCT00845039 (1) [back to overview]The Number of Participants Who Died During 30-Day Follow-Up
NCT00848783 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients With One-year Recurrence-free Survival
NCT00856375 (5) [back to overview]DoR by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population
NCT00856375 (5) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of OS: ITT Population
NCT00856375 (5) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population
NCT00856375 (5) [back to overview]ORR by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population
NCT00856375 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants (≥2%) With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events NCI-CTCAE Grade 3 or Higher
NCT00856830 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00856830 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicity Regimen A - Phase I
NCT00856830 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events - Phase II
NCT00857246 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Potentially Curative Surgery
NCT00857246 (7) [back to overview]Safety of the Induction Regimen
NCT00857246 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Response Rate of an Induction Regimen Consisting of Irinotecan, Cisplatin and Cetuximab
NCT00857246 (7) [back to overview]"Rate of Down-staging From Pre-operative Clinical Staging"
NCT00857246 (7) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (Adjuvant Therpary)
NCT00857246 (7) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (Induction Treatment and Curative Surgery)
NCT00857246 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Clearance of Nodal Involvement Among Patients Who Have Received the Induction Therapy
NCT00871169 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00871169 (2) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00876993 (3) [back to overview]To Provide Safety and Efficacy Data for to Recommend Further Larger Studies.
NCT00876993 (3) [back to overview]Measurement of Number of Adverse Events
NCT00876993 (3) [back to overview]2 Year Event Free Survival With Children Treated With This Regimen.
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to Ganitumab
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Time to Objective Response
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Part 1: Objective Response Rate
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Part 1: Emergence of Mutant KRAS
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Worst Post-baseline Grade 3 or Higher Laboratory Toxicities
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00891930 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to Panitumumab
NCT00911820 (5) [back to overview]Best Response
NCT00911820 (5) [back to overview]7-month Progression-Free Survival
NCT00911820 (5) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT00911820 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00911820 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response (OR) Rate
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]CL of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Vss of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Steady-state Volume of Distribution (Vss) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Vss of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]AUC0-24 of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Tmax of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Tmax of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Concentration at the End of Infusion (Ceoi) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibody (HAHA)
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]T1/2 of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]T1/2 of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Apparent Terminal Half-life (T1/2) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Clearance From Plasma (CL) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]CL of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone in or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Number of Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0-168 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-168) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0-24 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-24) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]AUC0-168 of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]Cmax of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00925015 (24) [back to overview]AUC0-24 of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab
NCT00932438 (2) [back to overview]Tumor Response
NCT00932438 (2) [back to overview]Number of Serious Adverse Events
NCT00940316 (4) [back to overview]Toxicity of the Combination of Study Drugs
NCT00940316 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00940316 (4) [back to overview]Tumor Response Rate Based on Complete Response (CR)+ Partial Response (PR) + Stable Disease (SD)
NCT00940316 (4) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT00941655 (9) [back to overview]Median Blood Loss During Surgery
NCT00941655 (9) [back to overview]Median Hospital Stay After Initial Surgery
NCT00941655 (9) [back to overview]12 Months Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT00941655 (9) [back to overview]Median Duration of Cytoreduction Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)
NCT00941655 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Patients With Limited Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma: Arm II
NCT00941655 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Patients With Limited Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma: Arm I
NCT00941655 (9) [back to overview]Gillys Stage Before and After Surgery
NCT00941655 (9) [back to overview]Completeness of Cytoreduction (CCR) Score
NCT00941655 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events
NCT00948935 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival Rate at Five Months
NCT00948935 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate From Combination Chemotherapy
NCT00953121 (5) [back to overview]6 Month Progression-free Survival
NCT00953121 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00953121 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00953121 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00953121 (5) [back to overview]Safety of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Combination With Irinotecan and Carboplatin
NCT00954512 (2) [back to overview]Part 2: Number of Participants With Each Type of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-Determined Overall Best Response
NCT00954512 (2) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00960063 (3) [back to overview]Best Overall Response Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00960063 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-robatumumab Antibodies
NCT00960063 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Without Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline for Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline for EORTC QLQ Brain Neoplasm 20 (BN20) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline for Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Score at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Received Corticosteroid for Glioblastoma
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Response on FLAIR Imaging
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With A Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) and With A BOR of CR or Partial Response (PR)
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
NCT00967330 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival at 16 Weeks After Administration of CS-7017 Combined With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Occurring in ≥10% of Participants Following Administration of CS-7017 Combined With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Best Overall Response and Objective Response Rate Following Administration of CS-7017 in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Progression-Free Survival Following Administration of CS-7017 in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00967616 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Progression-Free Survival: Sensitivity Analysis Including Clinical Progression After Administration of CS-7017 and Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil After Failure of First-line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00979017 (5) [back to overview]Incidence and Severity of Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemorrhage and Systemic Hemorrhage
NCT00979017 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00979017 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade ≥ 4 Hematologic and ≥ Grade 3 Non-hematologic Toxicities
NCT00979017 (5) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00979017 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00980460 (5) [back to overview]Number of Cycles on Which Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Coded According to CTC AE Version 5 Were Observed
NCT00980460 (5) [back to overview]Disease Status at the End of 2 Courses of Therapy
NCT00980460 (5) [back to overview]Number of Deaths
NCT00980460 (5) [back to overview]Feasibility of Referral for Liver Transplantation
NCT00980460 (5) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00991952 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00993044 (1) [back to overview]Dose Limiting Toxicity
NCT00996346 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Temsirolimus
NCT00996346 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Irinotecan
NCT01004159 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate of Cetuximab 500mg/m2/Week in Combination With Irinotecan in the Enrolled Patient Population
NCT01004159 (2) [back to overview]12-week Progression Free Survival Rate Upon Escalation of Cetuximab Dose to 500mg/m2 in Combination With Irinotecan After Progression on Standard Dose Therapy in Patients With KRS Wild Type Colorectal Cancer
NCT01008475 (6) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT01008475 (6) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Tumor Response
NCT01008475 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01008475 (6) [back to overview]Safety Part: Number of Subjects Experiencing DLTs (Dose Limiting Toxicity)
NCT01008475 (6) [back to overview]Randomized Part: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01008475 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Time
NCT01012609 (7) [back to overview]Event Free Survival
NCT01012609 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Development of Rash, Either Acneiform and/or Desquamation
NCT01012609 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT01012609 (7) [back to overview]Number of Samples Demonstrating EGFR Copy Number Gain
NCT01012609 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity
NCT01012609 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01012609 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With High-grade Astrocytoma and Diffuse Pontine Tumors Achieving One Year Progression Free Survival.
NCT01017653 (7) [back to overview]Safety of Panitumumab in Combination With Irinotecan
NCT01017653 (7) [back to overview]Relationship Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGF-R) Mutational Analysis and Efficacy or Toxicity
NCT01017653 (7) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01017653 (7) [back to overview]6-month Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01017653 (7) [back to overview]Effect of Panitumumab in Combination With Irinotecan on Corticosteroid Dose
NCT01017653 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01017653 (7) [back to overview]One-Year Overall Survival
NCT01055314 (5) [back to overview]Feasibility of the Addition of Temozolomide to Chemotherapy Determined by Patient Enrollment
NCT01055314 (5) [back to overview]Response Rate (CR + PR)
NCT01055314 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0
NCT01055314 (5) [back to overview]Feasibility of the Addition of Cixutumumab to Chemotherapy Determined by Patient Enrollment
NCT01055314 (5) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival
NCT01075048 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response and Stable Disease Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-Type KRAS Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy
NCT01075048 (7) [back to overview]Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported in ≥ 10% of Participants Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy
NCT01075048 (7) [back to overview]Treatment-Emergent Infection and Infestation Adverse Events Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy
NCT01075048 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Using Computed Best Response Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy
NCT01075048 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-Type K-ras Oncogene (KRAS) Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy
NCT01075048 (7) [back to overview]Best Overall Tumor Response and Objective Response Rate Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy
NCT01075048 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-Type K-ras Oncogene (KRAS) Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy
NCT01079780 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01079780 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01079780 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With an Objective Response Rate (CR or PR)
NCT01079780 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-related Adverse Events
NCT01091259 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression Free Survival
NCT01091259 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT01091259 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01091259 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 6 Months
NCT01091259 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3 and Higher Toxicities
NCT01114555 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Related Toxicity
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease (SD)
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Complete Response
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease Within 12 Weeks From Start of Treatment
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Excluding Deaths Not Related to Underlying Cancer
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Duration of Overall Response
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Time to Progression Excluding Deaths
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Time to Progression Excluding Deaths Not Related to Underlying Cancer
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Excluding Deaths
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01131078 (17) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS)
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examinations
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01133990 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Parameter
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 Global Health Status
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol- 5D (EQ-5D)
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving an Objective Response (Objective Response Rate)
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Ramucirumab
NCT01183780 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Ramucirumab Antibodies
NCT01217437 (3) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT01217437 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01217437 (3) [back to overview]Response
NCT01226719 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01226719 (5) [back to overview]To Determine the Acute Toxicity Produced by This Regimen.
NCT01226719 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01226719 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01226719 (5) [back to overview]R0 Resection Rate
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Response Duration
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Frequency of Adverse Events
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Secondary Biomarkers Analysis
NCT01276379 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Ramucirumab Drug-Related Adverse Events or Serious Adverse Events
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Experienced Any Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT) During the DLT Assessment Period
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Ramucirumab
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Best Overall Response [Anti-Tumor Activity of FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)]
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Clearance (CL) of Ramucirumab
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Half Life (t1/2) of Ramucirumab
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serum Anti-IMC-1121B Antibodies (Immunogenicity)
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss) of Ramucirumab
NCT01286818 (9) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Ramucirumab
NCT01296763 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT01296763 (2) [back to overview]Number of Years From Cycle 1, Day 1 On-Study to Date of Death
NCT01298570 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01298570 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01298570 (4) [back to overview]Drug Metabolism
NCT01298570 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Severe Adverse Events
NCT01322815 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Alive and Free of Progression at 4 Months (Patients Who Have Undergone Prior Therapy) and 10 Months (Untreated Patients)
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Hematology)
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Coagulation)
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Urinalysis)
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm B
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Day 16 for Arm C
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in First Cycle (28 Days)
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Stage 2)
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Day 16 for Arm C
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm B
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -1 and Cycle 1 Day 1 for Arm D
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm B
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half Life (t1/2) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm B
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half Life (t1/2) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Vital Signs Values Meeting Prespecified Criteria
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs) by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) for AEs (CTCAE) (Version 4.0) Grade
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Ratio to Baseline in Serum Glucose Level at Cycle 2 Day 16 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Ratio to Baseline in Serum Insulin Level at Cycle 2 Day 16 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Ratio to Baseline in Serum Insulin Level at End of Treatment for Arm B, Arm C, and Arm D
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Cycle 1 Day 16 for Arm C
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Ratio to Baseline in Serum Glucose Level at End of Treatment for Arm B, Arm C, and Arm D
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Cycle 1 Day 16 for Arm C
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -1 and Cycle 1 Day 1 for Arm D
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm B
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Maximum Post-dose QT Interval Corrected
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Day 16 for Arm C
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Expression of Genes Relating to Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase (PI3K), Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) and/or Wingless-Type Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus Integration Site Family Member (Wnt) Pathway Signaling
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in QT Interval
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Chemistry)
NCT01347866 (44) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A
NCT01359007 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Toxicity
NCT01367275 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]OS in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]OS in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]OS in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
NCT01374425 (37) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
NCT01394939 (1) [back to overview]Determine Radiographic Response Rate of Patients Enrolled in the Phase 2a Portion of the Study
NCT01451632 (7) [back to overview]Dose Escalation: To Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of the MM-121 Plus Cetuximab and the MM-121 Plus Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan Combination
NCT01451632 (7) [back to overview]Immunogenicity
NCT01451632 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameters of MM-121
NCT01451632 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01451632 (7) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics
NCT01451632 (7) [back to overview]To Further Determine the Safety Parameters of the MM-121 + Cetuximab and MM-121 + Cetuximab + Irinotecan Combination by Determining the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of the Combination(s) (Via Recording of Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)): MM-121 Doses
NCT01451632 (7) [back to overview]To Further Determine the Safety Parameters of the MM-121 + Cetuximab and MM-121 + Cetuximab + Irinotecan Combination by Determining the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of the Combination(s): Cetuximab and Irinotecan
NCT01463982 (2) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR), Response Rate (RR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT01463982 (2) [back to overview]Dose Limiting Toxicity Assessment and Maximum Tolerated Dose Determination
NCT01479465 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01479465 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01479465 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]PFS in Low-ERCC1 Participants
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) in High-ERCC1 Patients
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT01498289 (6) [back to overview]PFS Variation by ERCC1
NCT01505608 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
NCT01505608 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) of Participants Using Days Until Progression
NCT01505608 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Participants Using RECIST Criteria
NCT01560949 (8) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival (DFS)
NCT01560949 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Local and Distant Failure
NCT01560949 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Correlative Studies Including DPC4 (SMAD4) Staining and Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) Pre-Surgery
NCT01560949 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Correlative Studies Including DPC4 (SMAD4) Staining and Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) Post-Surgery
NCT01560949 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants That Were SMAD4 Positive Before and After Surgery
NCT01560949 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01560949 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Resectability Rate
NCT01560949 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With R0 Margin Resection
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Association Between Longitudinal NLR (Longitudinal NLR ≤5 Versus NLR >5) and PFS as Assessed by Hazard Ratio
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete or Partial Response as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Phase B
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Association Between Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) [NLR ≤5 Versus NLR >5] and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Hazard Ratio
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Association Between NLR (NLR ≤5 Versus NLR >5) and OS as Assessed by Hazard Ratio
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Association Between NLR Normalization (First NLR Post-Baseline ≤5 Versus NLR >5) and PFS as Assessed by Hazard Ratio
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Duration of Disease Control (DDC) as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Overall
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]OS: Phase B
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) From the Start of Treatment to Study Completion: Overall
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Underwent Liver Resection: Overall
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]PFS Until First Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Phase A
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]PFS Until Second Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Phase B
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Survival Beyond First Disease Progression: Overall
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Time to Failure of Strategy (TFS): Overall
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]AQoL-8D Global Utility Score: Phase B
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Assessment of Quality of Life - Eight Dimensions (AQoL-8D) Global Utility Score: Phase A
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EuroQol-5D) Utility Score: Phase A
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Association Between Longitudinal NLR (Longitudinal NLR ≤5 Versus NLR >5) and OS as Assessed by Hazard Ratio
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]FACT-C Score: Phase B
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) Score: Phase A
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete or Partial Response as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Overall
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete or Partial Response as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Phase A
NCT01588990 (22) [back to overview]EuroQol-5D Utility Score: Phase B
NCT01591733 (7) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival
NCT01591733 (7) [back to overview]30 Day Post-operative Mortality Rate
NCT01591733 (7) [back to overview]Local Control Rates
NCT01591733 (7) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT01591733 (7) [back to overview]The Proportion of Participants With Surgery Related Adverse Events
NCT01591733 (7) [back to overview]Preoperative Toxicity of Grade 3 or Worse Related to FOLFIRINOX and Chemoradiation
NCT01591733 (7) [back to overview]Rate of R0 Resection
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Alisertib AUC
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Irinotecan Clearance
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]AURKA Genotype
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Aurora A Expression
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Alisertib Day 4 Trough, Day 5 Trough and Cmax
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Alisertib Tmax and Half-life
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Irinotecan AUC, APC AUC, SN-38 AUC, and SN-38G AUC
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]One Year Progression Free Survival Rate
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Irinotecan Cmax, APC Cmax, SN-38 Cmax, and SN-38G Cmax
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Response Rate for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma Treated With MLN8237, Irinotecan, and Temozolomide at the Identified MTD
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Data Associated With the Determination of the Recommended Phase 2 Dose
NCT01601535 (13) [back to overview]UGT1A1 Genotype
NCT01607554 (1) [back to overview]Tumor Response
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 1
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 From Time Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] in Cycle 1
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized AUC(0-∞) of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 2
NCT01634555 (6) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Cmax of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 2
NCT01660711 (2) [back to overview]Percentage Able to Complete Full Course of Therapy
NCT01660711 (2) [back to overview]Percentage Able to Complete Full Course of Preoperative Chemotherapy
NCT01670721 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01670721 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HRQL EQ-5D-3L VAS Score
NCT01670721 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in HRQL European-Quality of Life-5 Dimension Instrument-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score
NCT01670721 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of ISIS 183750 in Advanced Solid Tumors
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Intracellular and Stromal Presence of ISIS in Tumor Tissue
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Reduced Effect of elF4E Inhibition on Relevant Regulated Proteins
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Change in the Level of a Particular Gene Called elF4E [Eukaryotic Initiation Factors (elF)4e Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Levels] in Matched Pre and Post Tumor Biopsies
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Change in elF4e Protein Levels in Matched Pre and Post Tumor Biopsies
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Irinotecan in Advanced Solid Tumors
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Decrease in elF4E mRNA Expression in Peripheral Blood
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Objective Response
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]AUC(ALL) (Area Under the Plasma Concentration vs. Time Curve for All Time Points)
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival
NCT01675128 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01688336 (6) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT01688336 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival for Borderline Resectable Patients
NCT01688336 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01688336 (6) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS) of FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced (ULA) Pancreatic Cancer
NCT01688336 (6) [back to overview]Rate of Resectability (RR)
NCT01688336 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01726582 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Months
NCT01726582 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01726582 (4) [back to overview]Use of Biomarkers to Determine Course of Treatment
NCT01726582 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Completing Therapy Including Surgical Resection.
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Time to PFS2
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Who Underwent Liver Metastases Resections
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants Considered by the Investigator to be Unresectable on Study Enrollment Who Subsequently Underwent Attempted Curative Resections of Metastases
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival During First-Line Therapy (PFS1)
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response During First-Line Therapy (ORR1)
NCT01765582 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01767194 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients in the Dinutuximab Arm Who Are Responders
NCT01767194 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Randomized Patients Who Are Responders
NCT01773109 (1) [back to overview]Overall Objective Response Rate
NCT01803282 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
NCT01803282 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT01876446 (4) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Measured With Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1
NCT01876446 (4) [back to overview]Mean Duration of Response
NCT01876446 (4) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT01876446 (4) [back to overview]18 Week Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 14 Days Post Start of Infusion (AUC0-14 Day) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Aflibercept Immunogenicity Assessment: Number of Participants With Positive Sample(s) in the Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay and in the Neutralizing Anti-drug Antibodies (NAb) Assay
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 14 Days Post Start of Infusion (AUC0-14 Day) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Irinotecan: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Total Body Clearance (CL) for Irinotecan: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Total Body Clearance (CL) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Total Body Clearance (CL) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2z) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Steady State Drug Concentration (Css) for 5-FU: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Clearance at Steady State (CLss) for 5-FU: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Active Metabolite SN-38 / Irinotecan Ratio on Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (Rmet): Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration Observed (Tmax) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept in Cycle 1: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2z) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Free and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01882868 (27) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis
NCT01896856 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01896856 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity
NCT01896856 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01896856 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving R0 Resection (R0 Resection Rate)
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Toxicities Associated With Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Vascular Reconstruction
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Able to Undergo Resection
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01897454 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of SN-38
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) of PF-05212384
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time for the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Irinotecan
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time for the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of SN-38
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) of Irinotecan
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time for the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of PF-05212384
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Time for Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of SN-38
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Time for Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05212384
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of PF-05212384
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Coagulation) Abnormalities
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With ECG Maximum Increase From Baseline Meeting Pre-defined Criteria
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Urinalysis) Abnormalities
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Unacceptable Toxicity in Cycle 1 (Japanese LIC Only)
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05212384
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Hematology) Abnormalities
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Chemistry) Abnormalities
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With ECG Post-Baseline Maximum Absolute Values Meeting Pre-defined Criteria
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigators
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Irinotecan
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SN-38
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) of SN-38
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Time for Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Irinotecan
NCT01925274 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Expression of Pre-defined Gene Sequences in Biopsied Tumor Tissues
NCT01926197 (6) [back to overview]Grade 2 or Greater Gastrointestinal (GI) Toxicity
NCT01926197 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 1 Year
NCT01926197 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01926197 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01926197 (6) [back to overview]Metastasis-free Survival (MFS)
NCT01926197 (6) [back to overview]Local Progression-free Survival (Local PFS)
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Objective Response
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Toxicity and Tolerability (Arm A and Arm B) as Measured by the Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT01928290 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate (Confirmed and Unconfirmed, Complete and Partial)
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Phase II: Overall Survival
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II)
NCT01959139 (5) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of PEGPH20 in Combination With mFOLFIRINOX
NCT02024607 (6) [back to overview]The Objective Response Rate of Napabucasin Administered in Combination in FOLFIRI in Patients With FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT02024607 (6) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate of Patients With FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT02024607 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
NCT02024607 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival of Patients With FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT02024607 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival of Patients With FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT02024607 (6) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate
NCT02035137 (2) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response After One Course of Therapy
NCT02035137 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Greater Non-hematologic Toxicities
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-versus-time Curve (AUC) at Cycle 1 (AUC0-336h) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]AUC at Steady State (AUCss) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Cmax,sd of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Cmax,ss of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Ctrough,sd of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution (Vd) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Ctrough,ss of BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02069704 (13) [back to overview]Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported With BEVZ92 and Avastin®
NCT02095132 (9) [back to overview]Number and Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response With Partial or Complete Response
NCT02095132 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of Adavosertib in Terms of Systemic Exposure, AUC
NCT02095132 (9) [back to overview]Number and Percentage of Part B Neuroblastoma Participants With MYCN Amplification
NCT02095132 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of Adavosertib in Terms of Systemic Exposure, Cmax
NCT02095132 (9) [back to overview]Mean Fold Change in Gamma H2AX in Peripheral Blood Mono Nuclear Cells
NCT02095132 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of Adavosertib in Terms of Systemic Exposure, HL-Lambda (Half Life)
NCT02095132 (9) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of Adavosertib in Terms of Systemic Exposure, Tmax
NCT02095132 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Cycle 1 DLT
NCT02095132 (9) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT02119026 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT02119026 (9) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (Number of Participants With Response)
NCT02119026 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival of XELIRI Plus Bevacizumab and XELOX Plus Bevacizumab
NCT02119026 (9) [back to overview]Tumour Assessments (Based on RECIST Criteria) in 1st-line
NCT02119026 (9) [back to overview]Tumour Assessments (Based on RECIST Criteria) in 2nd-line
NCT02119026 (9) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT02119026 (9) [back to overview]First Line Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02119026 (9) [back to overview]Second Line PFS
NCT02119026 (9) [back to overview]Efficacy Duration of Disease Control by Tumor Assessment (CT/MRI/Clinical Examination)
NCT02164916 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT02164916 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival in Patients Who Register to Arm 3 (Crossover) After Disease Progression on Arm 1
NCT02164916 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT02164916 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Patients Who Register to Arm 3 (Crossover) After Disease Progression on Arm 1
NCT02164916 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02178709 (8) [back to overview]Rate of R0 Resection
NCT02178709 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Successfully Underwent Surgery After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX
NCT02178709 (8) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (Percentage of Patients With Complete Response, Partial Response, or Stable Disease)
NCT02178709 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02178709 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Pathologic Complete Response
NCT02178709 (8) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (Percentage of Patients With Complete Response or Partial Response)
NCT02178709 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Grade 3 or Above
NCT02178709 (8) [back to overview]Disease Free Survival
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at 6 Months
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]12-month, 18-month, and 24-month Overall Survival (OS) Rates
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]Relative Dose Intensity (RDI)
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]6-month and 12-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rates
NCT02292758 (10) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Central Nervous System (CNS) Disease Control (Cohort B)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Central Nervous System (CNS) Disease Control Rate (Cohort A and C)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Systemic Disease Control (Cohort B)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Systemic (Non-CNS) Response Rate (Cohort A and C)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Systemic (Non-CNS) Disease Control Rate (Cohort A and C)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Cohort A and C)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (Cohort A and C)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (Cohort A and C)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Overall Disease Control Rate (Cohort A and C)
NCT02312622 (10) [back to overview]Related Adverse Events (Toxicity)
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Response Rate (RR) Using RECIST 1.1 Criteria
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 9 Months
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Irinotecan
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Gemcitabine
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Docetaxel
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cisplatin
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Capecitabine
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR) Using RECIST 1.1 Criteria
NCT02324543 (10) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using RECIST 1.1 Criteria
NCT02327169 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02327169 (8) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT02327169 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02327169 (8) [back to overview]Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of MLN2480
NCT02327169 (8) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT02327169 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT02327169 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT02327169 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for MLN2480
NCT02358863 (1) [back to overview]The Number of Patients With Tumor Size Reduction (Objective Response Rate)
NCT02485834 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT02485834 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02485834 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Had Pathologic Complete Response
NCT02485834 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieved R0 Resection During Surgery
NCT02485834 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reported Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT02508077 (1) [back to overview]4-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate
NCT02511132 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT02511132 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02511132 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events Determined by Laboratory Assessments and Physical Examinations
NCT02562716 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02562716 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients Going to Surgery for Resection After Preoperative Chemotherapy.
NCT02562716 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Response Following Preoperative Chemotherapy, Including Confirmed and Unconfirmed, Complete and Partial Response, Per RECIST 1.1.
NCT02562716 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival From the Time of R0 or R1 Resection.
NCT02562716 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving R0 Resection After Preoperative Chemotherapy.
NCT02562716 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in All Participants
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in All Participants
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in All Participants
NCT02564263 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)
NCT02568046 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Nature, Severity, and Occurrence Measured From Baseline to End of Trial Participation, as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (Version 4.03) (CTCAE v4.03).
NCT02582970 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02582970 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival Time
NCT02582970 (7) [back to overview]Mean Direct Medical Cost for Cancer Related Medical Care Utilization
NCT02582970 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Survival
NCT02582970 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Best Overall Response
NCT02582970 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Died
NCT02582970 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death
NCT02620865 (3) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02620865 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02620865 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Toxicity (CTCAE Version 4.0)
NCT02625623 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02625623 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Scale Score at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT02625623 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire Through Composite Index Score at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT02625623 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire Through Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT02625623 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02625623 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02625623 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (EORTC QLQ-STO22) Questionnaire Scores at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part A
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part A
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part B
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part C
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part C
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part A
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Olaratumab Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part C
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part B
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part C
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Objective Response Rate [ORR])
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part B
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part A
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Olaratumab Antibodies
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part A
NCT02677116 (16) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02753127 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02753127 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02753127 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events in the General Population
NCT02753127 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for Global Health Status at Time 2 (Cycle 5 Day 1) and Time 4 (Cycle 9 Day 1).
NCT02753127 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for Physical Functioning Status at Time 2 (Cycle 5 Day 1) and Time 4 (Cycle 9 Day 1).
NCT02753127 (7) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT02753127 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate, ORR
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02890355 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT02896907 (1) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life as Defined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Final Analysis
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Hematology and Coagulation Laboratory Parameters
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Vital Sign Abnormalities
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shift in Visual Acuity Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Score
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shifts in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Baseline to Maximum Grade On-treatment
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview]Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameters
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Interim Analysis
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-State Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for a Metabolite of Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm - Interim Analysis
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm - Final Analysis
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Triplet Arm vs. Doublet Arm
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Doublet Arm vs. Control Arm
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), v1.1 of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Encorafenib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Binimetinib
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Clearance (CL) for Cetuximab
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
NCT02928224 (78) [back to overview](Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero Time (Predose) to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution of IBI308 in Plasma After Single Dose Administration
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Sintilimab in Solid Tumor Participants
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee by Investigator
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]TTR According to RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]DOR According to RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Sintilimab in Solid Tumor Participants
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]Number of All Study Participants Who Demonstrate a Tumor Response
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]The Half-life (t1/2) of IBI308 in Plasma After Single Dose Administration
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]OS for Participants
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]PFS According to RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator
NCT02937116 (13) [back to overview]Clearance of IBI308 in Plasma After Single Dose Administration
NCT02975882 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Antitumor Activity of Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Rapamycin
NCT02975882 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum of Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Rapamycin Concentration Curve
NCT02975882 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Cycle 1 and 2 Dose Limiting Toxicities Attributable to Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Rapamycin
NCT02975882 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)/Lung Cancer Supplement (LC13) Dyspnea Scale at Week 12
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 1: OS
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 2: ORR
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-LC13 Cough Scale at Week 12
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 2: Median Time to Objective Response (OR)
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 2: Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 2: PFS
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 2: Median Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT03088813 (12) [back to overview]Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT03098030 (4) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT03098030 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03098030 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03098030 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT03099265 (1) [back to overview]Grade 3 or Greater Acute and Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity
NCT03116152 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT03116152 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT03116152 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03116152 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT03119064 (3) [back to overview]Response
NCT03119064 (3) [back to overview]Toxicities
NCT03119064 (3) [back to overview]Determination of Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
NCT03136055 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03136055 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03136055 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03136055 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, T1/2: Half-life of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, Total Clearance (CL) of Eribulin and Irinotecan
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Eribulin and Irinotecan
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Eribulin and Irinotecan
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Eribulin Mesilate in Combination With Irinotecan Hydrochloride
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution Estimates From the Population PK Model for Eribulin
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, Total Clearance (CL) of Eribulin and Irinotecan
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, T1/2: Half-life of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, AUC(0-inf): Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero (Pre-dose) Extrapolated to Infinite Time of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, AUC(0-inf): Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero (Pre-dose) Extrapolated to Infinite Time of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, AUC(0-t): Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero (Pre-dose) to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Phase 1, Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38
NCT03245450 (19) [back to overview]Model Predicted Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL) of Eribulin
NCT03279237 (4) [back to overview]Clinical Response Rate
NCT03279237 (4) [back to overview]The Completion Rate of Chemotherapy in Combination With Chemoradiation
NCT03279237 (4) [back to overview]Pathologic Complete Response Rate
NCT03279237 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v4.0
NCT03288987 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03288987 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03288987 (6) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT03288987 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of the Adverse Events
NCT03288987 (6) [back to overview]Number of Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Samples Among Patients (Immunogenicity)
NCT03288987 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT03323034 (8) [back to overview]Half-life of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide
NCT03323034 (8) [back to overview]MTD/RP2D of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide
NCT03323034 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Greater Toxicities Associated With Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide
NCT03323034 (8) [back to overview]T Max of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide
NCT03323034 (8) [back to overview]Anti-tumor Activity of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide
NCT03323034 (8) [back to overview]AUC of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide
NCT03323034 (8) [back to overview]C Max of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide
NCT03323034 (8) [back to overview]Clearance of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide
NCT03368859 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03368859 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03368859 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the ITT Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]HRQoL as Assessed by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) in the ITT Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]HRQoL as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L in the PD-L1 Positive Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) in the ITT Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set.
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) in the PD-L1 Positive Analysis Sets
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-Oesophagus Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18) Reported in ITT Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the ITT Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-OES18) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set.
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C-30) in the ITT Analysis Set
NCT03430843 (15) [back to overview]HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set
NCT03495921 (4) [back to overview]Vigil Manufacture Success Rate: Number of Participants Eligible for Treatment on the Main Study.
NCT03495921 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03495921 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03495921 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03504423 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03504423 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03504423 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03665441 (7) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03665441 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v5.0
NCT03665441 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT03665441 (7) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT03665441 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03665441 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03665441 (7) [back to overview]Time to Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 First Worsening in Global Health Status Analysis
NCT03736720 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Assessed by RECIST 1.1
NCT03736720 (4) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QOL) as Assessed by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)
NCT03736720 (4) [back to overview]Time-to Treatment Failure
NCT03736720 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in All Participants
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in All Participants
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in All Participants
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT03933449 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus
NCT04072445 (6) [back to overview]PFS
NCT04072445 (6) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT04072445 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT04072445 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT04072445 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT04072445 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT04753216 (7) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR)
NCT04753216 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
NCT04753216 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease
NCT04753216 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT04753216 (7) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT04753216 (7) [back to overview]Number of Observed Serious and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
NCT04753216 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT05718466 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT05718466 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT05718466 (3) [back to overview]Local Tumor Control

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is defined as the time from start of treatment to the date of death. Participants who did not die were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. (NCT00022698)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 1, Initial Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)22.9
Cohort 2, Amended Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)20.5

[back to top]

Duration of Overall Complete Response

The duration of overall complete response was assessed from the time that measurement criteria were met for complete response until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease was objectively documented. Participants without observed progressive disease after an objective complete response were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. (NCT00022698)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 Months

Interventionmonths (Number)
Cohort 1, Initial Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)12.45
Cohort 2, Amended Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)12.68

[back to top]

Duration of Overall Response

Duration of overall response was assessed from the time that measurement criteria were first met for CR/PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease was documented. It was analyzed for responders only. Participants without observed progressive disease after an objective response were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. (NCT00022698)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 1, Initial Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)7.0
Cohort 2, Amended Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)7.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With One-year Survival

Survival was measured as the time from start of treatment to the date of death or till one year whichever occurred first. (NCT00022698)
Timeframe: Up to Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort 1, Initial Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)67
Cohort 2, Amended Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)71

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Time to disease progression was assessed as the time from start of treatment to the time the participant was first recorded as having disease progression or died due to causes other than disease progression. If a participant never progressed while being followed, he/she was censored at the date of the last tumor assessment or the date of the last dose if no post-baseline tumor measurement was available. (NCT00022698)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 1, Initial Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)6.1
Cohort 2, Amended Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)7.6

[back to top]

Time To Objective Response

The time to objective response is defined as the time from start of treatment to the date of first objective response. Participants who never responded during study were censored at the last tumor assessment or the date of last dose, whichever was later, or at the date of death if occurring prior to response. (NCT00022698)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 1, Initial Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)5.5
Cohort 2, Amended Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)4.3

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure was assessed as the time from start of treatment to the time the participant was withdrawn due to any of the reasons such as adverse events, progressive disease, insufficient therapeutic response, death, failure to return, or refused treatment, did not cooperate or withdrew consent. (NCT00022698)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 1, Initial Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)5.8
Cohort 2, Amended Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)7.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Deaths

An adverse event (AEs) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. A serious adverse event is defined as any event which was fatal (resulted in death), life-threatening (with immediate risk of death), resulted in a new or prolongation of a current hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, considered medically significant by the investigator, required intervention to prevent one or more of the outcomes listed above. (NCT00022698)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 Months

,,
InterventionNumber of participants (Number)
Any AEsSAEsDeaths During StudyDeaths During Follow-up
Cohort 1, Initial Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)1510013
Cohort 2, Amended Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)5225323
Total Participants (Cohort 1 + Cohort 2)6735336

[back to top]

Tumor Response Rate Based on Tumor Measurement as Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.0 (RECIST 1.0)

Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.0). CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. PR is defined as a greater than or equal to (>/=) 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. Participants who did not have a post-baseline tumor measurement were considered non-responders in the assessment of ORR. (NCT00022698)
Timeframe: Approximately 43 Months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRPR
Cohort 1, Initial Regimen:(Capecitabine + Irinotecan)740
Cohort 2, Amended Regimen: (Capecitabine + Irinotecan)242

[back to top]

Overall Survival Time

Survival was measured from the date of randomization onto study to death from any cause.Patients who were still alive at the end of the study were censored at the last date of known alive. Median survival time was calculated in the 81 eligible and treated patients. (NCT00033657)
Timeframe: Approximately 1 month after completing all treatments, then every 3 months up to 2 years, every 6 months from 2-5 years of study entry and annually 6-10 years from study entry

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cisplatin / Irinotecan / RT (Arm A)35.0
Paclitaxel / Cisplatin / RT (Arm B)21.0

[back to top]

Recurrence-free Survival Time

Recurrence-free survival is measured from the date of complete response to recurrence of the cancer. Patients without recurrence were censored at the last date of known recurrence-free. Median recurrence-free survival time was calculated in the eligible and treated patients. (NCT00033657)
Timeframe: Approximately 1 month after completing all treatments, then every 3 months up to 2 years, every 6 months from 2-5 years of study entry and annually 6-10 years from study entry

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cisplatin / Irinotecan / RT (Arm A)39.8
Paclitaxel / Cisplatin / RT (Arm B)12.4

[back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Rate

A patient would have achieved a pathologic complete response if no histopathological evidence of residual tumor is found in the resected esophageal specimen and nodal tissue. (NCT00033657)
Timeframe: approximately 1 month after completing all treatments, then every 3 months up to 2 years, every 6 months from 2-5 years of study entry and annually 6-10 years from study entry

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cisplatin / Irinotecan / RT (Arm A)15.4
Paclitaxel / Cisplatin / RT (Arm B)16.7

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Objective Response Evaluated by RECIST (Solid Tumor Response Criteria)

"Per RECIST criteria, Complete response (CR)= disappearance of all target and nontarget lesions Partial response (PR)= >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions from baseline, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.~Objective response = CR + PR" (NCT00042939)
Timeframe: Assessed every 12 weeks until progression

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Irinotecan/Docetaxel0.045
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/Cetuximab0.07

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as time from registration to death from any cause. (NCT00042939)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Irinotecan/Docetaxel6.5
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/Cetuximab5.3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival was defined as the shorter of:~The time from registration to progression. or~The time from registration to death without documentation of progression given that the death occured within 4 months of the last disease assessment without progression (or registration, whichever is more recent).~Progression is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s) or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions." (NCT00042939)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Irinotecan/Docetaxel3.9
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/Cetuximab4.5

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Thromboembolic Events

To determine the rate of thromboembolic events in this population when prophylactic enoxaparin sodium is administered. (NCT00042939)
Timeframe: Assessed every 6 weeks while on treatment and for 30 days after the end of treatment

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Irinotecan/Docetaxel0
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/Cetuximab0.023

[back to top]

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Status

EGFR expression was be evaluated by staining 5-micron paraffin sections of tumor biopsies with anti-EGFR clone 2-18C9 (DAKO Corporation, Carpinteria, CA) using an indirect immunoperoxidase technique according to the instructions provided by DAKO. In brief, this includes an antigen retrieval pretreatment, the blocking of endogenous peroxidase activity, incubation with anti-EGFR antibody or a negative reagent control, staining with a detection system, visualization, and coverslipping. (NCT00042939)
Timeframe: Original tumor tissue samples submitted within one month of patient randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PositiveNegative
Arm A: Irinotecan/Docetaxel291
Arm B: Irinotecan/Docetaxel/Cetuximab301

[back to top]

Confirmed and Unconfirmed Complete and Partial Responses.

Patients underwent chest CT/MRI every 6 weeks while on treatment and tumor response was evaluated by RECIST in the subset of patients with at least one target lesion at baseline. A target lesion was defined as a lesion with a longest diameter of at least 2 cm ( or at least 1 cm if by spiral CT). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all disease, including non-target lesions. A partial response (PR) was defined as a 30% or greater decrease in the sum of the longest diameters. Confirmation of a CR or PR was defined as a second determination of CR or PR at least 4 weeks after the first determination. (NCT00045162)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks while on protocol treatment for a maximum of 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cisplatin + Irinotecan197
Cisplatin + Etoposide190

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the duration between the date of randomization( enrollment) and the date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive were censored at the date of last contact. (NCT00045162)
Timeframe: Weekly while on treatment, then every 3 months for first year, then every 6 months unitl a maximum of 3 years from enrollment.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cisplatin + Irinotecan9.9
Cisplatin + Etoposide9.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-Free Survival was defined as the duration from the date of randomization (enrollment) until the date of documentation of progression as defined by RECIST (a 20% increase over nadir in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions, clear progression of a non-target lesion in the opinion of the treating investigator, appearance of new lesions, or symptomatic deterioration) or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and without evidence of progression were censored at the date of last contact. (NCT00045162)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks until disease progression or a maximum of 3 years from the date of enrollment.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cisplatin + Irinotecan5.7
Cisplatin + Etoposide5.2

[back to top]

Number of Patients With a Given Type and Grade of Adverse Event.

Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. Only patients who received protocol treatment and were assessed for adverse events are included. (NCT00045162)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks while subject on protocol treatment for a maximum of 12 weeks.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ARDSAbdominal pain/crampingAcidosisAlkaline phosphatase increaseAllergic reactionAnal incontinenceAnemiaAnorexiaAnxiety/agitationApneaArrhythmia, NOSArthralgiaAtaxia (incoordination)Bilirubin increaseBlurred visionBone painCardiac ischemia/infarctionCardiovascular-otherCataractCerebrovascular ischemiaChest pain,not cardio or pleurColitisConfusionConstipation/bowel obstructionCreatinine increaseDehydrationDelusionsDepressionDiarrhea without colostomyDizziness/light headednessDyspepsia/heartburnDyspneaEdemaEpistaxisErythema multiforme/blisteringEsophagitis/dysphagiaFatigue/malaise/lethargyFebrile neutropeniaFever without neutropeniaFlu-like symptoms-otherGGT increaseGI Mucositis, NOSGI-otherGU-otherGastric ulcerGastritisHeadacheHematemesisHematologic-otherHemorrhage-otherHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypernatremiaHypertensionHyperuricemiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaHypotensionHypoxiaIleusInfection w/o 3-4 neutropeniaInfection with 3-4 neutropeniaInfection, unk ANCInner ear-hearing lossInsomniaJoint,muscle,bone-otherLVEF decrease/CHFLeukopeniaLipase increaseLung-otherLymphopeniaMelena/ GI bleedingMetabolic-otherMood/consciousness change, NOSMuscle weakness (not neuro)MyalgiaNauseaNeuro-otherNeutropenia/granulocytopeniaPRBC transfusionPain-otherPersonality/behavioral changePlatelet transfusionPneumonitis/infiltratesPneumothoraxProthrombin time increasePruritusRT-painRash/desquamationRenal failureReportable adverse event, NOSRespiratory infect w/ neutropRespiratory infect w/o neutropRespiratory infection, unk ANCSGOT (AST) increaseSGPT (ALT) increaseSIADHSecond primarySeizuresSensory neuropathySinus tachycardiaSomnolence/consciousness lossStomatitis/pharyngitisSupraventricular arrhythmiaSyncopeThrombocytopeniaThrombosis/embolismThrombotic microangiopathyTumor lysis syndromeUreteral obstructionUrinary electrolyte wastingUrinary retentionUrinary tr infect w/ neutropVentricular arrhythmiaVoice change/stridor/larynxVomitingWeakness (motor neuropathy)Weight loss
Cisplatin + Etoposide1812214017101121162107214472701940211113353302121011110117102427832172858601324342101090290013335122462701321211371110433011110075215021110103001
Cisplatin + Irinotecan082200193601001108111142349541161212710024511120012002010123112126219338714721220211015710811041460108363114030004133133222102135138120011123413

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death. (NCT00057837)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 1 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
PET (Topotecan/Etoposide/Cisplatin/G-CSF)11.9
PIE (Irinotecan/Cisplatin/Etoposide)11.0

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Objective Response by Solid Tumor Response Criteria (RECIST)

"Per RECIST criteria, Complete response (CR)= disappearance of all target and nontarget lesions Partial response (PR)= >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions from baseline, and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.~Objective response = CR + PR" (NCT00057837)
Timeframe: Assessed every 6 weeks while on treatment, and then every 3 months for patients < 2 years from study entry, every 6 months if patient is 2-3 years from study entry.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
PET (Topotecan/Etoposide/Cisplatin/G-CSF)0.697
PIE (Irinotecan/Cisplatin/Etoposide)0.576

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the period measured from the time that measurement criteria are met for complete or partial response (whichever status is recorded first) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented, taking as reference the smallest measurements recorded since treatment started. (NCT00057837)
Timeframe: Assessed every 6 weeks while on treatment, and then every 3 months for patients < 2 years from study entry, every 6 months if patient is 2-3 years from study entry.

InterventionMonths (Median)
PET (Topotecan/Etoposide/Cisplatin/G-CSF)6.0
PIE (Irinotecan/Cisplatin/Etoposide)6.0

[back to top]

Change in Patterns of Gene Expression Pre- and Post-treatment Performed by GeneChip Analysis

Number of Participants with a Change in Gene Expression from Pre to Post Treatment (NCT00061932)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum 1 (Previously Untreated)2
Stratum 2 (Previously Treated)2

[back to top]

True Response Rate Evaluated for the Combination of Irinotecan and PS341 by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

CT or MRI imaging scans of measurable lesions were obtained at baseline and every 8 weeks thereafter. Responses were classified according to RECIST criteria (version 1.0) (NCT00061932)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stratum 1 (Previously Untreated)3
Stratum 2 (Previously Treated)1

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

Overall Survival (OS) and Disease Free Survival (DFS) are the secondary endpoints. Technical problems with measurement of OS leading to unreliable or uniterpretable data. Data adjudication was invalid, and needs to be re-adjudicated. Therefore, only DFS data is being reported. (NCT00062374)
Timeframe: Every 3 mos for the first 2 yrs, then every 6 mos for 2 years and once a year afterwards, up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I23.8

[back to top]

Histological Response Determined by FDG Uptake Correlates

"The primary objective was to demonstrate that a decrease in FDG-SUV discriminates treatment response. Response was defined pathologically based on microscopic inspection for residual cancer cells and fibrosis.~Using a two sample t-test, we would be able to adequately test that the decrease in SUV early in the treatment plan is significantly different between responders and non responders. Data adjudication was invalid, and needs to be re-adjudicated~Non-Responder= Tumor Regression Grade 3 or higher Responder=Tumor Regression Grade 1 (CR) or Grade 2 (PR)" (NCT00062374)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Progression of DiseaseRespondersNon-Responders
Arm I2338

[back to top]

Confirmed Response Rate (Partial or Complete Response for 2 Consecutive Evaluations at Least 4 Weeks Apart) as Measured by RECIST Criteria

The primary endpoint is confirmed response rate. If measurable disease is present, a confirmed tumor response is defined to be either a CR or PR noted as the objective status on 2 consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart. All registered patients meeting the eligibility criteria that have signed a consent form and have begun treatment will be evaluable for response. (NCT00066781)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients with response (Number)
Cohort I9
Cohort II13

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due> to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using> the method of Kaplan-Meier . Overall survival will be calculated for> all evaluable patients combined and by group (ie. for patients with or> without the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism). (NCT00066781)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort I4
Cohort II9.3

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Time to disease progression is defined as the time from registration to documentation of disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression, the patient will be considered to have had tumor progression at the time of their death unless there is sufficient documented evidence to conclude no progression occurred prior to death. If the patient is declared to be a major treatment violation, the patient will be censored on the date the treatment violation was declared to have occurred. In the case of a patient starting treatment and then never returning for any evaluations, the patient will be censored for progression on day 1 post-registration. The distribution of time to progression will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Time to disease progression will be calculated for all evaluable patients combined and by group (ie. for patients with or without the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism). (NCT00066781)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort I3.7
Cohort II3.4

[back to top]

3-year Disease Free Survival

Disease free survival (DFS) was defined as time from randomization to recurrence, second invasive primary cancer and death from any cause, whichever occurred first. 3-year DFS rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00068692)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months withihn 2 years of study entry, every 6 monhts between years 3-5 and then annually for 5 years, estimated at 3 years

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Irinocetan (Arm I)0.670
Oxaliplatin (Arm II)0.717
Control (Arm III)0.704

[back to top]

Proportion of Sphincter Preservation

Proportion of sphincter preservation was defined as number of patients with sphincter preservation divided by total number of patients randomized to the arm (NCT00068692)
Timeframe: assessed at primary surgery time

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Irinocetan (Arm I)0.814
Oxaliplatin (Arm II)0.724
Control (Arm III)0.655

[back to top]

3-year Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. 3-year OS rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00068692)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months withihn 2 years of study entry, every 6 monhts between years 3-5 and then annually for 5 years, estimated at 3 years

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Irinocetan (Arm I)0.965
Oxaliplatin (Arm II)0.843
Control (Arm III)0.870

[back to top]

Failure Pattern

Type of failures (local/regional recurrence vs. distant recurrence vs. concurrent recurrence vs. second primary cancer vs. deaths) in the analysis population (NCT00068692)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months withihn 2 years of study entry, every 6 monhts between years 3-5 and then annually for 5 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Local/regional recurrence onlyDistant recurrence onlyBoth local/regional and distant recurrenceAny recurrenceSecond primary cancerDeath
Control (Arm III)510116221
Irinocetan (Arm I)315220319
Oxaliplatin (Arm II)511420521

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)

"The primary endpoint for this study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint.~Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier." (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: At 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Wild-type KRAS Arm A74.6
Wild-type KRAS Arm D71.5

[back to top]

Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)

The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below. (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 8 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Wild-type KRAS Arm A51.1
Wild-type KRAS Arm D73.3

[back to top]

Toxicity, Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (v3) (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)

The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). The overall toxicity rates (percentages) for grade 3 or higher adverse events considered at least possibly related to treatment are reported below. (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 8 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Mutant KRAS Arm A55.6
Mutant KRAS Arm D72.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Wild-type KRAS Patients)

Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS wild-type randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event free rates (percentage) are reported below for Wild-type KRAS Patients. (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Wild-type KRAS Arm A87.3
Wild-type KRAS Arm D85.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival as Measured by the 3-year Event-free Rate (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)

Evidence of death from any cause within 3 years counted as events in the time to event- Kaplan Meier analysis of overall survival for patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint. The 3-year event-free rates (percentage) are report below for mutant KRAS patients. (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mutant KRAS Arm A87.9
Mutant KRAS Arm D82.7

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (Arms A and D: Mutant KRAS Patients)

"A secondary endpoint for this study was to investigate the disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III colon cancer who are KRAS mutant (or KRAS-nonevaluable) and randomized to one of two treatment regimens: 1) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, and fluorouracil (Arm A) or 2) oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil and cetuximab (Arm D). Participants treated according to Arms B, C, E, and F treatment schedules received treatment which included irinotecan hydrochloride and therefore were not analyzed for this endpoint.~Disease-free survival is defined as the time from randomization until tumor recurrence or death, whichever is first. Estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier." (NCT00079274)
Timeframe: At 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mutant KRAS Arm A67.1
Mutant KRAS Arm D65.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Second Primary Rate at 4 Years

Time to second primary is defined as time from randomization to date of the appearance of a second primary cancer, last known follow-up (censored), or death without second primary (competing risk). Second primary rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan2
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin6

[back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Rate

"A pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no evidence of residual cancer histologically; disease progression or death before surgery was considered less than pCR (even without surgical specimen). All cases were reviewed by the study's surgical oncology co-chair for the determination of pCR.~Each arm was first analyzed alone. If the arm had 9 or more pCRs in 48 evaluable pts, then the null hypothesis (H0) of 10% pCR rate would be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis of 25%, providing 90% power with a two-sided 10% type I error rate. If both arms reject H0, then statistical selection theory would be used to choose the arm for further study in a phase III trial. If only one arm has acceptable pCR rate, then that arm would be pursued in a phase III trial." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: After protocol surgery, approximately 10-16 weeks from randomization based on surgery occurring 4-8 weeks after chemoradiation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan10.4
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin20.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Two Years

The gastro-intestinal (GI) symptom score is calculated from five symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and two years

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan0.4
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin6.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Completion of Post-operative Chemotherapy

The gastro-intestinal (GI) symptom score is calculated from five symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of post-operative chemotherapy approximately 32 to 40 weeks from randomization based on 18 weeks of post-operative chemotherapy

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-1.5
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin3.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Gastro-intestinal Symptom Score at Completion of Chemoradiation

The gastro-intestinal (GI) symptom score is calculated from five symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of chemoradiation approximately 6-8 weeks from randomization

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan5.9
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin20.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Two Years

"Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30. The question responses range from 1 very poor to 7 excellent such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates decline in quality of life. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and two years

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-6.8
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Two Years

"The defecation symptom score is calculated from seven symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 not at all to 4 very much such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and two years

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan0.4
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Post-operative Chemotherapy

"The defecation symptom score is calculated from seven symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 not at all to 4 very much such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of post-operative chemotherapy, approximately 32 to 40 weeks from randomization based on 18 weeks of post-operative chemotherapy

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-1.6
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin14.6

[back to top]

Local-regional Failure Rate at 4 Years

Local-regional failure is defined as any of the following: no clinical complete response (cCR) in the primary site and/or nodes at any time after treatment completion (persistence), recurrence and/or progression in the primary site and/or nodes after cCR, and nonprotocol surgery to the primary site after cCR. Time to local-regional failure is defined as time from randomization to date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without local-regional failure (competing risk). Local-regional failure rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan16
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin18

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival Rate at 4 Years

Disease-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to date of local-regional failure, the appearance of distant metastases, the appearance of a second primary failure, or date of death from any cause/ Disease-free survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients last known to be alive without failure are censored at the date of last contact. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan68
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin62

[back to top]

Distant Failure Rate at 4 Years

Time to distant failure is defined as time from randomization to date of the appearance of distant metastases, last known follow-up (censored), or death without distant failure (competing risk). Distant failure rates are estimated by the cumulative incidence method. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan24
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-CR38 Defecation Symptom Score at Completion of Chemoradiation

"The defecation symptom score is calculated from seven symptom questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-CR38. The question responses range from 1 not at all to 4 very much such that a higher response indicates worse symptoms. The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (best) to 100 (worst). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms. A negative number indicates improvement in symptoms." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of chemoradiation, approximately 6-8 weeks from randomization

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan4.8
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin8.8

[back to top] [back to top]

Survival Rate at 4 Years

Survival time is defined as time from registration/randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: From randomization to four years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan85
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin75

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Completion of Chemoradiation

"Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30. The question responses range from 1 very poor to 7 excellent such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates decline in quality of life. A positive number indicates improvement in QOL." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of chemoradiation, approximately 6-8 weeks from randomization

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-10.3
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin-12.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in QLQ-C30 Global Health Status Score at Completion of Post-operative Chemotherapy

"Global Health Status is calculated from two questions on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC QLQ]-C30. The question responses range from 1 very poor to 7 excellent such that a higher response indicates better quality of life (QOL). The mean of these responses is linearly transformed to a range of 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Change from baseline is calculated as the time point value - baseline value and a decrease from baseline indicates decline in quality of life. A positive number indicates improvement in QOL." (NCT00081289)
Timeframe: Baseline and completion of post-operative chemotherapy approximately 32 to 40 weeks from randomization based on 18 weeks of post-operative chemotherapy

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Irinotecan-12.5
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation With Oxaliplatin-7.1

[back to top]

Response Rates (RR) in Metastatic Gastric/GE Junction Tumors

Response is defined as the number of patients with a CR (Complete Response) or PR (Partial Response) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST criteria). Possible evaluations include: CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of the target lesions or appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage or increase of target lesions. (NCT00084617)
Timeframe: at 12 weeks (after 2 cycles of treatment)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Progressive Disease (PD)Stable Disease (SD)
Treatment (Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Capecitabine)29316

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Length of time patients survived after treatment (NCT00084617)
Timeframe: at 40 months from study activation

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Capecitabine)8.98

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) and Partial Response (PR) Duration

The duration of overall response is measured from the time measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). (NCT00084617)
Timeframe: at 40 months from study activation

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Capecitabine)5.95

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival is defined as time from randomization (to Arm A or Arm B) or registration (to Arm C) to the earlier of disease progression or death. Patients alive and progression-free at last follow-up were censored. (NCT00098787)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months if the patient is within 2 years of registration and every 6 months once the patient is 2-4 years post-registration.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (High TS, IROX/Bev)10
Arm B (High TS, FOLFOX/Bev)9
Arm C (Low or Intermediate TS, FOLFOX/Bev)13

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as time from randomization (to Arm A or Arm B) or registration (to Arm C) to death. Patients alive at last follow-up were censored. (NCT00098787)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months if the patient is within 2 years of registration and every 6 months once the patient is 2-4 years post-registration.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (High TS, IROX/Bev)18
Arm B (High TS, FOLFOX/Bev)21
Arm C (Low or Intermediate TS, FOLFOX/Bev)32

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate is defined as proportion of patients who achieve complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Response was assessed using Solid Tumor Response Criteria (RECIST). CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. (NCT00098787)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months if the patient is within 2 years of registration and every 6 months up to 4 years post-registration.

Interventionproportion (Number)
Arm A (High TS, IROX/Bev)0.33
Arm B (High TS, FOLFOX/Bev)0.38
Arm C (Low or Intermediate TS, FOLFOX/Bev)0.49

[back to top]

Time to Progression: FOLFIRI, mIFL and CapeIRI

Time to disease progression is defined as the number of months from date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD). (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: every 6 weeks until disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRI7.62
mIFL5.98
CapeIRI5.82

[back to top]

Time to Progression : Celecoxib and Placebo

Time to disease progression is defined as the number of months from date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD). (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: every 6 weeks until disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Celecoxib6.64
Placebo6.70

[back to top]

Time to Progression: Bevacizumab With FOLFIRI, mIFL

Time to disease progression is defined as the number of months from date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD). (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: every 6 weeks until disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI11.17
Bevacizumab + mIFL8.31

[back to top]

Survival Time: FOLFIRI, mIFL and CapeIRI

Survival time defined as time from date of randomization to date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the subject known to be alive. (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: assessed at least every week during treatment and at least every 3 months during follow-up

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRI23.06
mIFL17.64
CapeIRI18.92

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) at Primary Completion: FOLFIRI and mIFL

Time to disease progression is defined as the number of months from date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD). (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: every 6 weeks until disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRI8.18
mIFL6.01

[back to top]

Overall Relative Dose Intensity of Irinotecan

Relative dose intensity for a cycle was calculated as the percentage of the actual dose intensity of the cycle divided by the planned dose intensity of the cycle. Overall relative dose intensity was calculated as the average relative dose intensities over all cycles. (Dose intensity for each cycle was calculated as the actual dose level of the study medication received in that cycle divided by the number of weeks in the cycle.) (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: End of treatment cycle

Interventionpercent dose intensity (Mean)
FOLFIRI93.9
mIFL94.5
CapeIRI93.8
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI93.3
Bevacizumab + mIRI95.5

[back to top]

Survival Time: Celecoxib and Placebo

Survival time defined as time from date of randomization to date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the subject known to be alive. (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: assessed at least every week during treatment and at least every 3 months during follow-up

Interventionmonths (Median)
Celecoxib21.06
Placebo18.83

[back to top]

Survival Time at Last Follow-Up Visit: Bevacizumab With FOLFIRI, mIFL

Survival time defined as time from date of randomization to date of death. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the subject known to be alive. Zero subjects analyzed indicates median could not be analyzed based on number of subjects who died. (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: Last Follow-Up Visit

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI27.99
Bevacizumab + mIRI19.22

[back to top]

Overall Response: FOLFIRI, mIFL and CapeIRI

A subject will be considered achieving an overall response if the subject has a sustained Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) for at least 4 weeks, confirmed by tumor assessments. (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. PR: greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the Pre-treatment sum LD. ) (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: every 6 weeks during chemotherapy until disease progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
FOLFIRI68
mIFL61
CapeIRI56

[back to top]

Overall Response: Celecoxib and Placebo

A subject will be considered achieving an overall response if the subject has a sustained CR or PR for at least 4 weeks, confirmed by tumor assessments. (Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the Pre-treatment sum LD. ) (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: every 6 weeks during chemotherapy until disease progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Celecoxib84
Placebo101

[back to top]

Overall Response: Bevacizumab With FOLFIRI, mIFL

A subject will be considered achieving an overall response if the subject has a sustained CR or PR for at least 4 weeks, confirmed by tumor assessments. (Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the Pre-treatment sum LD. ) (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: every 6 weeks during chemotherapy until disease progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI33
Bevacizumab + mIFL32

[back to top]

Dose Reduction Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Number of subjects that had at least one Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) that led to a dose reduction. TEAE includes all reported Adverse Events that occurred within 30 days of last study medication. (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: Day 1; Day 8; and at end of every 3 treatment cycles for FOLFIRI; end of every 2 cycles for mIRI

Interventionparticipants (Number)
FOLFIRI18
mIFL14
CapeIRI39
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI6
Bevacizumab + mIRI8

[back to top]

1 Year Survival: FOLFIRI, mIFL and CapeIRI

Number of patients alive or dead at 1 year. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the subject known to be alive. (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: 1 year from date of randomization

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alive at 1 yearDead at 1 yearCensored
CapeIRI894610
FOLFIRI101349
mIFL86478

[back to top]

1 Year Survival: Bevacizumab With FOLFIRI, mIFL

Number of patients alive or dead at 1 year. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the subject known to be alive. (NCT00101686)
Timeframe: 1 year from date of randomization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alive at 1 yearDead at 1 yearCensored
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI4575
Bevacizumab + mIRI33225

[back to top]

Response Rate on Step 2

Tumor response was evaluated via Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0, and response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response among all eligible and treated patients. Complete response was defined as disappearance of all tumor lesions. Partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. (NCT00103259)
Timeframe: Tumor response was assessed after every 2 cycles until progression or intolerable toxicity with maximum of 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cross-over From Bortezomib to Combined Arm0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival on Step 1

Progression-free survival was defined as time from registration to step 1 to disease recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was measured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0, and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. (NCT00103259)
Timeframe: Every 3 months for first 2 years from protocol entry, then every 6 months until 3 years from study entry

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Bortezomib+Irinotecan)1.6
Arm II (Bortezomib)1.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival on Step 1

Overall survival was defined as time from registration on step 1 to death from any cause. It was evaluated in all 61 eligible and treated patients. (NCT00103259)
Timeframe: Survival was assessed every 3 month within 2 years and every 6 months betwen 2 and 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Bortezomib+Irinotecan)9.1
Arm II (Bortezomib)7.3

[back to top]

Response Rate on Step 1

Tumor response was evaluated via Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0, and response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response among all eligible and treated patients. Complete response was defined as disappearance of all tumor lesions. Partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. (NCT00103259)
Timeframe: Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles until progression or intolerable toxicity with maximum of 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Bortezomib+Irinotecan)13.1
Arm II (Bortezomib)2.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Objective Response (Confirmed and Unconfined, Complete and Partial)

Complete response (CR) is complete disappearance of all measurable and non-measurable disease. No new lesions. No disease related symptoms. Normalization of markers and other abnormal lab values. Partial response (PR) applies only to patients with at least one measurable lesion. Greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of longest diameters of all target measurable lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease. No new lesions. Confirmation of CR or PR means a repeat scan at least 4 weeks apart documented before progression or symptomatic deterioration. (NCT00109850)
Timeframe: at week 16, then every 3 months until progression

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cetuximab+Cisplatin+Irinotecan Followed by Radiation Therapy17.6

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Measured from date of registration to date of first observation of progression or symptomatic deterioration. Patients last known to be alive and progression-free are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00109850)
Timeframe: 0 - 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab+Cisplatin+Irinotecan Followed by Radiation Therapy6.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 2 Years

Measured from time of registration to date of death due to any cause, or last contact date (NCT00109850)
Timeframe: 0-2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cetuximab+Cisplatin+Irinotecan Followed by Radiation Therapy33.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With a Dose-Limiting Toxicity

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)=serious drug side effects preventing further dose escalation. If 1 of the first 3 subjects developed a DLT during cycle 1 up to 3 additional subjects were enrolled at that dose level. The maximum dose level at which DLTs occurred in fewer than 2 out of 3 to 6 subjects was defined as the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: Prior to each 21-day cycle until dose-limiting toxicities

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Subjects with a dose-limiting toxicitySubjects with no dose-limiting toxicity
Group A 150/1603
Group A: 150/2024
Group A: 250/16012
Group A: 75/2015
Group B: 150/2004
Group B: 250/2016
Group B: 75/2017

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at Steady State Corrected for Body Surface Area (VSS/BSA)

The single dose PK of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; VSS/BSA was evaluated based on concentration-time profile. (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study

InterventionL/m2 (Mean)
Group A: 752.081
Group A: 1501.860
Group A: 2502.157
Group B: 752.138
Group B: 1501.887
Group B: 2502.179

[back to top]

Human Anti-cetuximab Antibody (HACA) Response

In order to be considered positive for anti-cetuximab a sample had to: 1) be evaluable (i.e., have a pre and at least one post-treatment timepoint), 2) have an anti-cetuximab value > 7 ng/mL and 3) have a post-treatment sample at least twice the pre-treatment level. (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: Blood was drawn immediately prior to cetuximab infusions, on a 21-day cycle

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Evaluable ParticipantsUnevaluable ParticipantsParticipants with positive HACA level
Number of Participants27151

[back to top]

Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Hypomagnesemia

Blood samples were collected at selected times (pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment) for clinical laboratory evaluations. Grade 3= Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Group A 250/161

[back to top]

Tumor Response

"Non-central nervous system (CNS) tumors evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), criteria to define when cancer patients improve (respond), stay the same (stable), or worsen (progression). CNS tumors evaluated based on measurements by investigator, dependence on corticosteroids, and neurologic exam." (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: Every other 21-day cycle

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Assessable/Unable to Determine
CNS Primary Tumor210104
Non-CNS Primary Tumor08111

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve, Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC[INF])

The single dose PK of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; AUC(INF) was evaluated based on concentration-time profile. (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study

Interventionµg•h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Group A: 751598.3
Group A :1508871.2
Group A: 25017706.0
Group B: 751925.2
Group B: 1507027.3
Group B: 25013410.4

[back to top]

Clearance Corrected for Body Surface Area (CL/BSA)

The single dose PK of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; CL/BSA was evaluated based on concentration-time profile. (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study

InterventionL/h/m2 (Mean)
Group A: 750.057
Group A :1500.017
Group A: 2500.015
Group B: 750.040
Group B: 1500.021
Group B: 2500.020

[back to top]

Number of Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs)

Toxicity assessments performed at least weekly from the 1st dose of study drug until at least 30 days after the final dose of study drug and thereafter every 4 weeks until all study-related toxicities resolved, returned to baseline, or were deemed irreversible, whichever was longer. Grade 3=severe AE; grade 4=disabling or life threatening. (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: Weekly throughout the study and every 4 weeks thereafter

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Deaths (total)Deaths within 30 days of last doseSAEsAEs leading to discontinuation of study treatmentGrade 3-4 AEs
Group A 150/1620002
Group A: 150/2052414
Group A: 250/1653605
Group A: 75/2000204
Group B: 150/2010314
Group B: 250/2011404
Group B: 75/2030527

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Leukopenia

Blood samples were collected at selected times (pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment) for clinical laboratory evaluations. Grade 3= Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Group A 75/203
Group A 150/160
Group A 150/203
Group A 250/164
Group B 75/202
Group B 150/202
Group B 250/204

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Neutropenia

Blood samples were collected at selected times (pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment) for clinical laboratory evaluations. Grade 3= Severe and undesirable AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Group A 75/203
Group A 150/160
Group A 150/203
Group A 250/163
Group B 75/203
Group B 150/201
Group B 250/204

[back to top]

Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Thrombocytopenia

Blood samples collected at selected times (pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment) for clinical laboratory evaluations. Grade 3= Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Group A 75/201
Group A 150/160
Group A 150/203
Group A 250/162
Group B 75/200
Group B 150/200
Group B 250/204

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

The single dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; Cmax was evaluated based on concentration-time profile. (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study

Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Group A: 7550.5
Group A :150112.9
Group A: 250163.7
Group B: 7553.4
Group B: 15083.1
Group B: 250148.5

[back to top]

Terminal Half-Life (T-Half)

The single dose PK of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; T-half was evaluated based on concentration-time profile. (NCT00110357)
Timeframe: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study

Interventionhours (Mean)
Group A: 7531.0
Group A :15075.2
Group A: 250110.3
Group B: 7537.9
Group B: 15061.1
Group B: 25081.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Time (Part 2)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time from enrollment to death or disease progression in Part 2 of the study. Participants who had not progressed and had not died were censored at their last disease assessment date. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: From enrollment until disease progression or death. Maximum follow-up time was 16 months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Panitumumab With FOLFIRI41.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Time (Part 1)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time from enrollment to death or disease progression in Part 1 of the study. Participants who had not progressed and had not died were censored at their last disease assessment date. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: From enrollment until disease progression or death. Maximum follow-up time was 25 months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Panitumumab With IFL24.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Objective Tumor Response (Part 1)

Objective tumor response (complete or partial) in Part 1 of the study, based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), where complete response = disappearance of all target lesions, partial response = ≥30% reduction in lesion size, progressive disease = ≥20% increase in tumor size; otherwise stable disease. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: Until disease progression (median 35 weeks) or 48 weeks, whichever occurred first

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Panitumumab With IFL9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Diarrhea (Part 2)

The number of participants with grade 3 or grade 4 diarrhea in Part 2 of the study. Grading of diarrhea followed the grading scale in Version 2.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC). (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: Until disease progression (median 47 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Panitumumab With FOLFIRI6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Grade 4 Diarrhea (Part 1)

The number of participants with grade 3 or grade 4 diarrhea in Part 1 of the study. Grading of diarrhea followed the grading scale in Version 2.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC). (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: Until disease progression (median 35 weeks) or 48 weeks, whichever occurred first

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Panitumumab With IFL11

[back to top]

Time to Initial Objective Tumor Response (Part 1)

Median time to first observed objective tumor response (complete or partial) among responders in Part 1 of the study. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: Until disease progression (median 35 weeks) or 48 weeks, whichever occurred first

Interventionweeks (Median)
Panitumumab With IFL5.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Died (Part 2)

The number of participants in Part 2 who died during the study. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: From enrollment until last contact. Maximum follow-up was 16 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Panitumumab With FOLFIRI6

[back to top]

Survival Time (Part 1)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from enrollment to death from any cause. Participants who did not die on study were censored at their last contact date. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: From enrollment until death. Maximum follow-up time was 25 months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Panitumumab With IFL73.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Objective Tumor Response (Part 2)

Objective tumor response (complete or partial) in Part 2 of the study, based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), where complete response = disappearance of all target lesions, partial response = ≥30% reduction in lesion size, progressive disease = ≥20% increase in tumor size; otherwise stable disease. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: Until disease progression (median 47 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Panitumumab With FOLFIRI8

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (Part 1)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from the date of first dose of panitumumab or chemotherapy to the date the decision was made to end treatment for any reason in Part 1 of the study. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: Until disease progression (median 35 weeks) or 48 weeks, whichever occurred first

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Panitumumab With IFL24.3

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression (Part 2)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time from the first dose of study drug to first observed disease progression or death if the death was due to disease progression (whichever comes first) in Part 2 of the study. Participants who had not progressed or died for reasons other than disease progression were censored at their last disease assessment date. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: From enrollment until death or diease progression. Maximum follow-up time was 16 months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Panitumumab With FOLFIRI47.3

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression (Part 1)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from the first dose of study drug to disease progression or death if due to disease progression (whichever comes first) in Part 1 of the study. Participants who had not progressed or died for reasons other than disease progression were censored at their last disease assessment date. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: From enrollment until disease progression or death. Maximum follow-up time was 25 months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Panitumumab With IFL35.0

[back to top]

Survival Time (Part 2)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from enrollment to death from any cause. Participants who did not die on study were censored at their last contact date. (NCT00111761)
Timeframe: From enrollment until death. Maximum follow-up time was 16 months.

Interventionweeks (Median)
Panitumumab With IFL73.1

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (Oxaliplatin)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to the date the decision was made to discontinue treatment for a reason other than a complete response to treatment within the oxaliplatin stratum. (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall study

InterventionMonth (Median)
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab5.7
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab5.9

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate (Irinotecan)

Best overall response of complete or partial response within irinotecan stratum (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionParticipant (Number)
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab49
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab46

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (Oxaliplatin)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to death from any cause or first observed disease progression (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall study

InterventionMonth (Median)
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab10.0
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab11.4

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate (Mutant KRAS)

Best overall response of complete or partial response in participants treated with irinotecan and having a mutant Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionParticipant (Number)
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab14
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab15

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate (Wild-type KRAS)

Best overall response of complete or partial response in participants treated with irinotecan and having a wild-type Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionParticipant (Number)
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab31
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab28

[back to top]

Time to Progression (Oxaliplatin)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to disease progression or death due to disease progression within the oxaliplatin stratum (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionMonth (Median)
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab10.8
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab11.4

[back to top]

Time to Progression (Irinotecan)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to disease progression or death due to disease progression within the irinotecan stratum (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionMonth (Median)
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab11.1
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab11.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (Wild-type KRAS)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to death from any cause or first observed disease progression in groups treated with oxaliplatin and having a wild-type Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionMonth (Median)
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab9.8
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab11.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Wild-type KRAS)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to death from any cause in groups treated with Oxaliplatin and having a wild-type Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS). Since the measure of dispersion could not be estimated for at least one treatment arm, participant incidence is provided in lieu of the median (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionParticipant (Number)
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab71
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab46

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Oxaliplatin)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to death from any cause in groups treated with Oxaliplatin (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall study

InterventionMonth (Median)
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab19.4
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab24.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (Mutant KRAS)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to death from any cause or first observed disease progression in groups treated with oxaliplatin and having a mutant Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS) (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionMonth (Median)
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab10.4
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab11.0

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate (Oxaliplatin)

Best overall response of complete or partial response within oxaliplatin stratum (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall study

InterventionParticipant (Number)
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab190
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab196

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Mutant KRAS)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to death from any cause in groups treated with Oxaliplatin and having a mutant Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus Oncogene (KRAS). Since the measure of dispersion could not be estimated for at least one treatment arm, participant incidence is provided in lieu of the median. (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionParticipant (Number)
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab47
Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab45

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Irinotecan)

Incidence of mortality from any cause in groups treated with Irinotecan. Incidence is provided in lieu of the median time to death since the median or its measure of dispersion was not estimable for at least one treatment arm. (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall study

InterventionParticipant (Number)
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab26
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab18

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (Irinotecan)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to death from any cause or first observed disease progression (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionMonth (Median)
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab10.1
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab11.7

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Through Week 12 (Irinotecan)

Objective tumor response (complete or partial) rate through week 12 based on central review in the Irinotecan stratum (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionParticipant (Number)
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab29
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab27

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (Irinotecan)

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the median time from randomization to the date the decision was made to discontinue treatment for a reason other than a complete response to treatment within the irinotecan stratum (NCT00115765)
Timeframe: Overall Study

InterventionMonth (Median)
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Plus Panitumumab6.6
Irinotecan and Bevacizumab Without Panitumumab6.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Review of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) To assess the toxicity associated with Arms A and B. Response rates and toxicity rates for each arm were to be estimated and exact (using Casella's method) 95% confidence intervals for those proportions computed. With the anticipated 75 patients in each arm, these estimated proportions would have standard errors not exceeding 7%. (NCT00127036)
Timeframe: 30 Days After End of Treatment - Average of 6 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
XELOX + Bevacizumab9
XELIRI + Bevacizumab11

[back to top]

Response to Treatment Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria (Evaluable Population)

Tumor response according to RECIST. (NCT00136955)
Timeframe: At baseline and every 8 weeks through end of treatment (21-28 days after last administration of study treatment)

Interventionparticipant (Number)
complete response (CR)partial response (PR)stable disease (SD)progressive disease (PD)not evaluablemissingResponse Rate (PR + CR) - naiveResponse Rate (PR + CR) - corrected
Irinotecan/Cisplatin87116001515

[back to top]

Response to Treatment Based on RECIST Criteria (Intent-to-Treat [ITT] Population)

Tumor response according to RECIST. (NCT00136955)
Timeframe: At baseline and every 8 weeks through end of treatment (21-28 days after last administration of study treatment)

Interventionparticipant (Number)
complete responsepartial responsestable diseaseprogressive diseasenot evaluablemissingResponse Rate (PR + CR) - naive
Irinotecan/Cisplatin881384016

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) and Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) (Evaluable Population)

TTP is date of first infusion to first date of documented progression or date of death due to progressive disease or date of further anti-tumor therapy, whichever occurs first. OS is time from date of first infusion to date of death due to any cause or last date patient is known to be alive at date of data cutoff for final analysis. (NCT00136955)
Timeframe: Tumor response measurements were made at baseline, according to RECIST criteria. After end of treatment, subject was followed-up every 12 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks.

Interventiondays (Median)
Overall SurvivalTime to tumor progression
Irinotecan/Cisplatin652277

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) and Time to Tumor Progression (ITT Population)

TTP is date of first infusion to first date of documented progression or date of death due to progressive disease or date of further anti-tumor therapy, whichever occurs first. OS is time from date of first infusion to date of death due to any cause or last date patient is known to be alive at date of data cutoff for final analysis. (NCT00136955)
Timeframe: Tumor response measurements were made at baseline, according to RECIST criteria. After end of treatment, subject was followed-up every 12 weeks plus or minus 2 weeks.

Interventiondays (Median)
Overall SurvivalTime to Tumor Progression
Irinotecan/Cisplatin448263

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

time interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of local, regional or distant relapse, or death due to cancer. (NCT00143403)
Timeframe: last tumor assessment date or cut-off date, whichever is earlier.

Interventionmonths (Median)
5-FU/FA21.6
Irinotecan + 5-FU/FA24.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rates

Probability of being alive was calculated in a yearly increment. (NCT00143403)
Timeframe: Median follow-up time (42 months)

,
Interventionsurvival rate (Number)
12 months24 months36 months
5-FU/FA0.9610.8450.716
Irinotecan + 5-FU/FA0.9730.8810.727

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method. (NCT00143455)
Timeframe: Baseline to date of progression (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment until progression)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)5.3552
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)6.2423

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

DR was defined as the time from start of the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method. (NCT00143455)
Timeframe: Baseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)5.5195
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)4.8953

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Overall Confirmed Response

Objective disease response = subjects with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A PR was defined as a ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00143455)
Timeframe: Baseline to first documentation of confirmed response (every 9 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months in follow up until progression)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)79
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)94

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) for the Full Analysis Population (FAP)

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method. (NCT00143455)
Timeframe: Baseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)10.2177
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)9.6591

[back to top]

Overall Survival for the Per Protocol (PP) Population

OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. For a subject not expiring, the OS time was censored on the last date of contact that they were known to be alive. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze variables of duration and event associated with possible censoring and estimate the medians survival by treatment groups. The confidence intervals for the medians were calculated using the Brookmeyer and Crowley's method. (NCT00143455)
Timeframe: Baseline to date of death (every 3 weeks for up to 6 months on study treatment and every 2 months for a minimum of 13 months post study treatment)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)10.5791
Etoposide + Cisplatin (Cohort 2)9.4292

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

"Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified WHO criteria) or death due to any cause.~Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment." (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to disease progression, death or last tumour assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI7.4
FOLFIRI Alone7.7

[back to top]

Quality of Life Assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30) Social Functioning

Mean social functioning scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) against time for each treatment group. Scores were derived from mutually exclusive sets of items, with scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: at baseline, at week 8, at week 16, at week 24, at week 32, and at week 40, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
At baselineAt week 8At week 16At week 24At week 32At week 40
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI75.2174.1473.7276.3174.0476.58
FOLFIRI Alone77.2876.7176.6777.9875.6478.07

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QOL) Assessment European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Global Health Status

Mean global health status scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) against time for each treatment group. Scores were derived from mutually exclusive sets of items, with scale scores ranging from 0 to 100 after a linear transformation. Higher scores indicate a better QoL. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: at baseline, at week 8, at week 16, at week 24, at week 32, and at week 40, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
At baselineAt week 8At week 16At week 24At week 32At week 40
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI58.8859.0260.7761.8359.6863.43
FOLFIRI Alone60.3361.8363.2964.0665.0764.02

[back to top]

Safety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse Event

Please refer to Adverse Events section for further details (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: time from first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 30 Nov 2007

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI599
FOLFIRI Alone597

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

"Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria) or death due to any cause.~Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment." (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to disease progression, death or last tumour assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI8.9
FOLFIRI Alone8.0

[back to top]

Participants With No Residual Tumor After Metastatic Surgery

Participants with no residual tumor after on-study surgery for metastases (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: time from first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 30 Nov 2007

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI29
FOLFIRI Alone10

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI46.9
FOLFIRI Alone38.7

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Mutant Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI31.3
FOLFIRI Alone36.1

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate (KRAS Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

The best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response as the best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionpercentage participants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI57.3
FOLFIRI Alone39.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

"Time from first assessment of Complete Response or Partial Response to disease progression or death (within 60 days of last tumor assessment).~Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment. Tumor assessments based on modified WHO criteria." (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from first assessment of complete response or partial response to disease progression, death or last tumor assessment reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI9.6
FOLFIRI Alone7.7

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

The disease control rate is defined as the percentage of subjects having achieved confirmed Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease as best overall response according to radiological assessments (based on modified WHO criteria). (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Evaluations were performed every 6 weeks until progression reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI84.3
FOLFIRI Alone85.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Time (Chinese V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Wild-Type Population) - Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessments

"Duration from randomization until radiological progression (based on modified WHO criteria) or death due to any cause.~Only deaths within 60 days of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment." (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to disease progression, death or last tumour assessment, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 27 July 2006

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI9.9
FOLFIRI Alone8.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival Time (KRAS Mutant Population)

Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whichever is later. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 31 May 2009

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI16.2
FOLFIRI Alone16.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival Time (KRAS Wild-Type Population)

Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whichever is later. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 31 May 2009

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI23.5
FOLFIRI Alone20.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival Time (OS)

Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whichever is later. (NCT00154102)
Timeframe: Time from randomisation to death or last day known to be alive, reported between day of first patient randomised, 10 Aug 2004, until cut-off date, 31 May 2009

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI19.9
FOLFIRI Alone18.6

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival is measured from the start of treatment until the time the participant is first recorded as having disease progression, or death due to any cause. If a participant has not progressed or died, progression free survival is censored at the time of the last follow up. (NCT00183872)
Timeframe: every 2 cycles

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm 1 - Irinotecan and Docetaxel4.1

[back to top]

Objective Response (Complete, Partial, Stable and Progression)

Objective response was defined using standard RECIST criteria. CR (complete response) = disappearance of all target lesions; PR (partial response) = 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter or target lesions; PD (progressive disease) = 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions SD (stable disease) = small changes that do not meet criteria of CR, PR, and PD. (NCT00183872)
Timeframe: every 2 cycles

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPRSDPD
Arm 1 - Irinotecan and Docetaxel07229

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is the duration from enrollment to death. For patients who are alive, overall survival is censored at the last contact. (NCT00191984)
Timeframe: baseline to date of death from any cause (up to 2 years follow-up)

Interventiondays (Median)
Pemetrexed + Irinotecan422

[back to top]

Duration of Response

"The duration of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was defined as the time from first objective status assessment of CR or PR to the first time of progression or death as a result of any cause. Response was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria that defines when participants improve (respond), stay the same (stable), or worsen (progression) during treatment.~Complete response (CR) = disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response (PR) = 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions." (NCT00191984)
Timeframe: time of response to progressive disease or death (up to 2 years follow-up)

Interventiondays (Median)
Pemetrexed + Irinotecan236

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Defined as the time from study enrollment to the first date of disease progression or death as a result of any cause. PFS was censored at the date of the last follow-up visit for participants who were still alive and who had not progressed. (NCT00191984)
Timeframe: baseline to measured progressive disease or death (up to 2 years follow-up)

Interventiondays (Median)
Pemetrexed + Irinotecan123

[back to top]

Best Overall Tumor Response

"Best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria that defines when participants improve (respond), stay the same (stable), or worsen (progression) during treatment.~Complete response (CR) = disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response (PR) = 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.~Progressive disease (PD) = 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Stable disease (SD) = small changes that do not meet above criteria." (NCT00191984)
Timeframe: baseline to measured progressive disease (up to 2 years follow-up)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseUnknown
Pemetrexed + Irinotecan618155

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Defined as the time from study enrollment to the first observation of disease progression, death as a result of any cause, or early discontinuation of treatment. Time to treatment failure was censored at the date of the last follow-up visit for patients who did not discontinue early, who were still alive, and who have not progressed. (NCT00191984)
Timeframe: baseline to stopping treatment (up to 2 years follow-up)

Interventiondays (Median)
Pemetrexed + Irinotecan66

[back to top]

2-Year Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the date of study entry until the date of tumor progression or death. 2-Year PFS is the percentage of patients alive and without progressive disease (PD) 2 years from the date of study entry. (NCT00193375)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intervention22

[back to top]

Number of Grade 3/4 Toxicities Patients Experienced on Maintenance Bevacizumab Following Chemoradiation for Limited Stage - Small Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC)

Toxicity was evaluated in all patients who received at least 1 dose of therapy, and graded according to CTCAE v. 3. (NCT00193375)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionGrade 3/4 Toxicity Events (Number)
HemorrhageDiarrheaFatigueHypertensionNauseaInfection - Other (Pnemonia)Pulmonary toxicitiesLeukopeniaNeutropeniaThrombocytopenia
Intervention2111144211

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate is the percentage of patients with complete response or partial response per RECIST v.1 Criteria. Complete response (CR) = Disappearance of all target lesions, disappearance of all nontarget lesions for at least 4 weeks. Partial Response (PR) = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters. (NCT00193375)
Timeframe: 18 month

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Intervention80

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS), the Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Death

Length of time, in months, that patients were alive from their first date of protocol treatment until death. (NCT00193596)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Etoposide/Gefitinib7.4
Irinotecan/Gemcitabine/Gefitinib8.5

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS), the Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease

Length of time, in months, that patients were alive from their first date of protocol treatment until worsening of their disease (NCT00193596)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Paclitaxel/Carboplatin/Etoposide/Gefitinib3.3
Irinotecan/Gemcitabine/Gefitinib5.3

[back to top]

2-month Response Rate

"Response rate is defined as the rate of participants with partial or complete responses according to RECIST V1.0.~Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD (RECIST V1.0.)." (NCT00210184)
Timeframe: 2 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Irinotecan Associated to Fluorouracil and Leucovorin25

[back to top]

Overall Survival

OS was defined as the time from trial inclusion to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death were censored at the date of the last follow-up or last patient contact. The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. (NCT00210184)
Timeframe: From date of inclusion until the date of date of death from any cause, assessed up to 12 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan Associated to Fluorouracil and Leucovorin10

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

PFS was defined as time since trial inclusion to progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, and data from patients progression-free and lost to follow-up before the study end were censored at date of last news. The PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00210184)
Timeframe: From date of inclusion until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan Associated to Fluorouracil and Leucovorin7

[back to top]

Disease-Free Survival

The three year rate of Disease-Free Survival (NCT00216086)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Single Group Assignment75.5

[back to top]

Local and Distant Disease Recurrence Rates

To determine the rates of local and distant disease recurrence after treatment. (NCT00216086)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionpercentage of particpants (Number)
metastatic disease recurrencelocally recurrence
Single Group Assignment220

[back to top]

Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate

"· To determine the pathological response rate of preoperative chemotherapy with capecitabine and irinotecan followed by combined modality chemoradiation with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.~Pathological response was defined in the protocol as the proportion of complete (pCR) and non-complete pathological response (pNCR) among all evaluable patients." (NCT00216086)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
pCRpNCR
Single Group Assignment3356

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Part I)

Length of subject survival after starting study treatment (NCT00240097)
Timeframe: baseline to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Regimen A and B12.9

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (Part I)

Time to progressive disease (NCT00240097)
Timeframe: baseline to five years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Regimen A and B8.95

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (Part I)

The primary objective is to determine the objective tumor response rate of sequential topoisomerase targeting with irinotecan/oxaliplatin followed by etoposide/carboplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with extensive SCLC and Stage IIIb (wet) - IV Large Cell Carcinoma of the Lung with neuroendocrine markers. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. Stable response means did not meet criteria for progressive or partical response. 20% progressive disease. (NCT00240097)
Timeframe: baseline to 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete responsePartial responseStable diseaseProgressive diseaseUnevaluable
Regimen A and B420101

[back to top]

Median Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is measured from the date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or date of death, whichever comes first. If a patient neither progresses nor dies, this patient will be censored at last contact date. (NCT00248287)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan+Carboplatin4.4
Irinotecan+Carboplatin+Cetuximab4.6

[back to top]

Duration of Response

"The duration of response is measured from the time measurement criteria are first met for CR/PR until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented.~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD." (NCT00248287)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or the date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan+Carboplatin5.4
Irinotecan+Carboplatin+Cetuximab6.0

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

OS is measured from the date of randomization to the date of death for a dead patient. If a patient is still alive or is lost to follow up, the patient will be censored at the last contact date. (NCT00248287)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan+Carboplatin12.5
Irinotecan+Carboplatin+Cetuximab14.6

[back to top]

Objective Response Rates (ORR)

To determine the objective response rates (CR + PR). Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00248287)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Irinotecan+Carboplatin36.4
Irinotecan+Carboplatin+Cetuximab36.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS will be measured from study entry until first documented progression or death from any cause. Time to event distributions will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS will be compared between Arm A and Arm B. (NCT00265850)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post-treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFOX or FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab10.6
Arm B: FOLFOX or FOLFIRI + Cetuximab10.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Survival time will be defined as the time from registration to death. Time to event distributions will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall Survival (OS) will be compared between Arm A and Arm B. (NCT00265850)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years post-treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFOX or FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab29.0
Arm B: FOLFOX or FOLFIRI + Cetuximab30.0

[back to top]

6-month Overall Survival

Percentage of patients survived at 6 months for patients whose tumors were xenografted and treated in the mouse when treated with the most active agent identified in that model (NCT00276744)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 153

[back to top]

Overall Response - Complete Response (CR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) and Partial Response (PR)

"The patient's best overall response obtained during Reporting Periods 1 and 2 will be scored as best response. Patients enrolled on Stratum 1 with bone marrow disease, a responder has no tumor cells detectable by routine morphology on 2 subsequent bilateral bone marrow aspirates and biopsies done at least 3 weeks apart. For patients enrolled on stratum 1 with MIBG only disease, response will be assessed using the Curie scale. Patients who have complete resolution of all MIBG positive lesions (CR) or resolution of at least one MIBG positive lesion with persistence of other lesions (PR) will be considered responders. For Stratum 2 a responder is defined to be a patient who achieves a best overall response of CR, VGPR or PR from CT/MRI scans from central review using (RECIST) Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor. A responder is defined to be a patient who achieves a best overall response of CR (Complete Response), VGPR (Very Good Partial Response) or PR (Partial Response)." (NCT00311584)
Timeframe: up to 6 courses of therapy, or about 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Disease Eval by Bone Marrow or MIBG (Irinotecan/Temozolomide)5
Disease Measurable by CT or MRI Scan (Irinotecan/Temozolomide)3

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Experiencing Grade 3 or Greater Hematologic and Non-hematologic Toxicity

Proportion of patients experiencing grade 3 or greater hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity, deemed as at least possibly related to treatment, graded using the NCI CTCAE version 3.0 (NCT00316862)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery)72

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Adenocarcinoma Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response (CR) After Surgery

A pathological complete response is defined as no tumor found on pathology review at surgery in all resected lymph nodes and tissue. All tissues sampled must have NO viable tumor (NCT00316862)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery)19

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Experiencing Grade 3 or Greater Pneumonitis or Esophagitis

Proportion of patients experiencing grade 3 or greater pneumonitis or esophagitis, deemed at least possibly related to treatment graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (NCT00316862)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PneumonitisEsophagitis
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery)05

[back to top]

Response Rate at First Scheduled Assessment

Tumor response was assessed by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen, pelvis, and all other sites of disease. Disease assessments were performed by central review according to the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at the Week 9/10 assessment visit and a corresponding CR or PR confirmed at the Week 13/14 assessment visit for the Q2W/Q3W regimens. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR: Either the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease (PD; ≥ 25% increase in lesion size) and no new lesions, or, at least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of existing non-target lesions, and no new lesions. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: Week 9 with confirmed response at Week 13 for the FOLFIRI and panitumumab Q2W regimen or at Week 10 with confirmed response at Week 14 for the irinotecan and panitumumab Q3W regimen.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment6
Reactive Skin Treatment6

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time-to-treatment failure is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first date of any of the following events: discontinuation of study therapy due to any reason (except for complete response and curative surgery), progression of disease, or death due to any cause. Participants who did not discontinue, who were still alive, and who did not have disease progression were censored at the date of last contact. Time to treatment failure was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: From randomization until the end of study; median time on study was 31 weeks and 41 weeks in each treatment group respectively with a maximum time on study of 97 weeks.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment3.1
Reactive Skin Treatment4.2

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Rate

Best overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) while on study. Tumor response was assessed by CT scan or MRI of the abdomen, pelvis, and all other sites of disease. Disease assessments were performed by central review according to the modified RECIST criteria. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR: Either the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) not qualifying for either CR or PD (≥ 25% increase in lesion size) and no new lesions, or, at least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of existing non-target lesions, and no new lesions. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: Response was assessed at Weeks 9 and 13 and then every 8 weeks for the Q2W regimen, or at Weeks 10, 14, 22 and then every 9 weeks for the Q3W regimen until the end of treatment; median treatment duration was 13 and 17 weeks in each group respectively.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment15
Reactive Skin Treatment11

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants who did not die while on study or who were lost-to-follow-up were censored at their last contact date. Overall survival was analyzed using all data regardless of whether it was collected during second- or third-line treatment. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: From randomization until the end of study; median time on study was 31 weeks and 41 weeks in each treatment group respectively with a maximum time on study of 97 weeks.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment11.2
Reactive Skin Treatment13.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicity of Any Type During the 6-week Skin Treatment Period

"The percentage of participants who developed at least 1 incidence of ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities of any type during the 6-week skin treatment period. Analysis of this endpoint was based on adverse event data associated with the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders system organ class. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) CTCAE version 3.0." (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment40
Reactive Skin Treatment62

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Specific Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicities During the 6-week Skin Treatment Period

Skin toxicities were assessed by the study clinician and graded according to the modified Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.3.0 Dermatology Toxicity Grading criteria, on a scale from Grade 1 (mild) to 4 (life-threatening). The specific skin toxicities of interest were pruritus, acneiform dermatitis, skin desquamation (also described as skin exfoliation), exfoliative dermatitis, paronychia, nail disorder, skin fissures, skin laceration, pruritic rash, pustular rash, skin infection, skin ulceration, and local infection. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment29
Reactive Skin Treatment62

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first date of observed disease progression or death due to any cause (whichever comes first). Participants who were alive and had not progressed while on study were censored at the date of last progression-free tumor assessment. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: From randomization until the end of study; median time on study was 31 weeks and 41 weeks in each treatment group respectively with a maximum time on study of 97 weeks.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment4.7
Reactive Skin Treatment4.1

[back to top]

Time to Progression

"Time from the date of randomization to the date of observed disease progression or death due to disease progression. Participants who did not have documented disease progression were censored at the date of last tumor assessment; participants who died for reasons other than disease progression while on study were censored at the date of death. PD: At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions, recorded since the treatment started, or at least a 25% increase in size of non-target lesions and the lesion(s) measure > 10 mm in one dimension, or the appearance of one or more new lesions.~Time to progression was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. This analysis excludes any data collected during follow-up for participants who began third-line treatment." (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: From randomization until the end of study; median time on study was 31 weeks and 41 weeks in each treatment group respectively with a maximum time on study of 97 weeks.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment4.9
Reactive Skin Treatment4.1

[back to top]

Most Severe Specific Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicities of Interest

The percentage of participants with a most severe grade of 2, 3 or 4 specific skin toxicity of interest reported during the 6-week skin treatment period. Skin toxicities were assessed by the study clinician and graded according to the modified CTCAE v.3.0 Dermatology Toxicity Grading criteria, on a scale from Grade 1 (mild) to 4 (life-threatening). The specific skin toxicities of interest were pruritus, acneiform dermatitis, skin desquamation (also described as skin exfoliation), exfoliative dermatitis, paronychia, nail disorder, skin fissures, skin laceration, pruritic rash, pustular rash, skin infection, skin ulceration, and local infection. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment2360
Reactive Skin Treatment40210

[back to top]

Rate of Disease Control at First Scheduled Assessment

Tumor response was assessed by CT scan or MRI of the abdomen, pelvis, and all other sites of disease. Disease assessments were performed by central review according to the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Disease control rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR, PR or stable disease (SD) at the Week 9/10 assessment visit and a corresponding response (CR or PR) confirmed at the Week 13/14 assessment visit for the Q2W/Q3W regimens. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage or increase in target lesions to qualify for PR or PD, with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: Week 9 with confirmed response at Week 13 for the FOLFIRI and panitumumab Q2W regimen or at Week 10 with confirmed response at Week 14 for the irinotecan and panitumumab Q3W regimen.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment63
Reactive Skin Treatment64

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Dermatologic Quality of Life Index (DLQI) Score

Skin-related quality of life was assessed using the DLQI. The DLQI questionnaire asks participants to evaluate the degree that their skin condition has affected their quality of life in the last week. Participants answer 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much); The DLQI score is calculated by summing the scores for all questions, resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0; higher scores indicate a more impaired quality of life. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=46, 44)Change from Baseline to Week 2 (n=42, 41)Change from Baseline to Week 3 (n=44, 42)Change from Baseline to Week 4 (n=42, 42)Change from Baseline to Week 5 (n=44, 42)Change from Baseline to Week 6 (n=42, 38)Change from Baseline to Week 7 (n=40, 40)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment0.30.71.31.71.31.62.0
Reactive Skin Treatment0.11.64.23.82.72.32.6

[back to top]

Time to First Occurrence of Specific Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicities of Interest

The time to the first occurrence of specific grade 2 or higher skin toxicities of interest was defined as the time from the first dose of panitumumab to the date of first occurrence of specific ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities of interest. Participants who did not experience specific skin-related toxicities were censored at their last skin toxicity assessment during the skin toxicity assessment period. Skin toxicities were assessed by the study clinician and graded according to the modified CTCAE v.3.0 Dermatology Toxicity Grading criteria, on a scale from Grade 1 (mild) to 4 (life-threatening). The specific skin toxicities of interest were pruritus, acneiform dermatitis, skin desquamation (also described as skin exfoliation), exfoliative dermatitis, paronychia, nail disorder, skin fissures, skin laceration, pruritic rash, pustular rash, skin infection, skin ulceration, and local infection. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pre-emptive Skin TreatmentNA
Reactive Skin Treatment2.1

[back to top]

Time to First Most Severe Specific Grade 2 or Higher Skin Toxicities of Interest

Time to the first most severe grade ≥ 2 of all the specific skin-related toxicities of interest was defined as the time from the first dose of panitumumab to the date of the first occurrence of the most severe specific ≥ grade 2 skin toxicity of interest during the 6-week skin treatment period. Participants who did not experience any specific skin-related toxicity of grade ≥ 2 were censored at their last skin toxicity assessment during the 6-week skin toxicity assessment period. Skin toxicities were assessed by the study clinician and graded according to the modified CTCAE v.3.0 Dermatology Toxicity Grading criteria, on a scale from Grade 1 (mild) to 4 (life-threatening). The specific skin toxicities of interest were pruritus, acneiform dermatitis, skin desquamation (also described as skin exfoliation), exfoliative dermatitis, paronychia, nail disorder, skin fissures, skin laceration, pruritic rash, pustular rash, skin infection, skin ulceration, and local infection. (NCT00332163)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
Pre-emptive Skin TreatmentNA
Reactive Skin Treatment2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Panitumumab Dose Reductions Due to the Specific Skin Toxicities of Interest

(NCT00332163)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-emptive Skin Treatment6
Reactive Skin Treatment11

[back to top]

Toxicity Rate

Percentage of participants with Grade 4 cardiac toxicities, Grade 4 Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS), and treatment-related deaths determined using CTCAE v4. (NCT00335556)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Cardiac toxicitiesTreatment-related deathsSinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome
Combined UH-2, UH-1, Window/UH-14.94.90

[back to top]

Long-term Survival of Patients With Stage I-IV Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors

The outcome of these patients will be compared with a fixed outcome based on that seen for similar patients treated with NWTS-5 regimen (NCT00002610). (NCT00335556)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionPercentage of 4-year OS (Number)
UH-138.9

[back to top]

Event Free Survival Probability

Event-free survival will be informally compared to that seem for similar patients treated on NWTS-5 (NCT00002610). (NCT00335556)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionPercent Probability 4 Year EFS (Number)
Regimen DD-4A100.0

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival of Patients With Diffuse Anaplastic Wilms' Tumor (DAWT)

Compare the outcome of patients treated with alternating CyCE/VDCy chemotherapy (with or without vincristine/irinotecan cycles) to a fixed outcome based on that seen for similar patients treated with NWTS-5 (NCT00002610). (NCT00335556)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionPercentage of 4-year OS (Number)
UH-176.1
Window/UH-125.0
UH-287.5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With INI1 Mutations in Renal and Extrarenal Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor by Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization

(NCT00335556)
Timeframe: At baseline

InterventionCount participants (Number)
UH-123
Window/UH-11

[back to top]

Response Rate

Criteria for response assessed by three-dimensional measurement: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all index lesions and non-index lesions. No new lesions; Partial Response (PR), At least a 65% decrease in the sum of the volumes of the index lesions. No new lesions; Response rate (RR) = CR+PR of patients who received window therapy. (NCT00335556)
Timeframe: Up to 2 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Window/UH-1 and UH-271

[back to top]

Time to Progression

time from start of protocol therapy until objective tumor progression (NCT00336856)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IRINOTECAN AND CETUXIMAB2.4

[back to top]

Response Rate (RR)

Percentage of partial responses (PR) + complete responses (CR). (NCT00336856)
Timeframe: every 6 - 8 weeks, up to 30 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IRINOTECAN AND CETUXIMAB6

[back to top]

Overall Survival

time from start of protocol therapy until death from any cause (NCT00336856)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
IRINOTECAN AND CETUXIMAB9.3

[back to top]

Evaluation of Safety and Toxicity

All toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria v3.0. (NCT00354679)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnorexiaAtrial flutterCNS cerebrovascular ischemiaDeath not associated with CTCAE term- Death NOSDehydrationEsophagitisFebrile neutropeniaHemoglobinHemorrhage, CNSInfection, otherLeukocytes (total WBC)NauseaNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)Pain - Chest wallPain - Extremity-limbPerforation, GI- JejunumPhosphate, low (hypophosphatemia)PlateletsPotassium, low (hypokalemia)Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access-related)Thrombosis/thrombus/embolismVomiting
Irinotecan, Cisplatin, Bevacizumab, Radiotherapy, & Surger1111573112221111112142

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Event Free at 4 Years Following Study Entry

Event-free survival: Time to recurrence, second malignancy, or death as a first event, estimated from a Kaplan Meier curve (NCT00354744)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
High_Risk_Rhabdomyosarcoma36

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Complete or Partial Response Assessed by RECIST Criteria

"Volumetric measurements of the primary tumor using an elliptical model (0.5 x the product of the 3 largest perpendicular diameters) to assess response to neoadjuvant therapy. The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) from the NCI will be used for assessment of the size of measurable metastases, including nodal metastases. Primary Tumor Measurement: Technical guidelines for cross-sectional imaging computed tomography (CT) slice thickness should be 5mm or less and the diameter of the measurable mass should be at least twice the reconstructed slice thickness. Smaller masses are considered detectable, but will be counted as non-measurable. Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of the tumor confirmed at >4 weeks. Partial Response (PR): At least 64% decrease in volume compared to the measurement obtained at study enrollment. Progressive Disease (PD): At least 40% increase in tumor volume compared to the smallest volume obtained since the beginning." (NCT00354744)
Timeframe: Protocol week 6 evaluation

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
High_Risk_Rhabdomyosarcoma63

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Experiencing Adverse Events Due to Concurrent Therapy

Adverse events are reported for patients receiving concurrent irinotecan hydrochloride and radiotherapy. (NCT00354744)
Timeframe: From enrollment to up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Course 1Course 2Course 3Course 4
High_Risk_Rhabdomyosarcoma53.368.479.355.7

[back to top]

Incidence of Toxicity

Grade 3 or 4 nausea, diarrhea, dehydration, radiation dermatitis, mucositis due to radiation. Severe and undesirable adverse event is considered as grade 3; Life-threatening or disabling adverse event is grade 4. Grade 4 is worse than grade 3. (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: Up to 15 weeks

InterventionProbability (Number)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)0.2072
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)0.3673

[back to top]

Local Failure

Compare 2-year local failure rate to the historical rate of 0.13 with IRSI-V. The Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy is from IRSI-V, and the number of participants of IRSI-V is unknown, but we have the rate of 0.13. (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)0.1757

[back to top] [back to top]

Acute and Late Effects of VAC as Delivered on This Study to D9803 VAC

The toxicity rates will be estimated for each phase and course of treatment, and will be compared to the fixed rates under D9803 using one-sided lower confidence intervals for a single proportion without adjustment for multiple comparisons. (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: Up to 43 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnemiaFebrile NeutropeniaNausea or HepatopathyPlatelet Count DecreasedVomiting
VAC (Weeks 1-15)58306279
VAC (Weeks 31 - 43)54171632

[back to top]

Response Rate (RR)

Proportion of patients with complete or partial response. Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of the tumor confirmed at > 4 weeks; Partial Response (PR): At least 64% decrease in volume compared to the baseline; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: Reporting Period 1 (Weeks 1 - 15)

InterventionProportion (Number)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)0.6667
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)0.6726

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison

Compare 4-year OS using eligible participants only to the historical rate of 0.70 with IRSI-V. The 4-year OS is probability of being alive after 4 years in the study. The Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy is from IRSI-V, and the number of participants of IRSI-V is unknown, but we have the rate of 0.70. (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)0.7293

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Probability of being alive after 4 years in the study. (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)0.7293
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)0.7223

[back to top]

Incidence of Bladder Dysfunction

Number of patients with a summary score greater than 8.5 (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: 3-6 years after enrollment

InterventionParticipant (Number)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)2
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)1

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS) Probability VAC and Early (Week 4) Radiotherapy Compared to Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy, Using IRSIV for Historic Comparison

Compare 4-year EFS using eligible participants only to the historical rate of 0.65 with IRSI-V. The 4-year EFS is probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 years in the study. The Delayed (Week 10) Radiotherapy is from IRSI-V, and the number of participants of IRSI-V is unknown, but we have the rate of 0.65. (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)0.6255

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS) by PAX Status

(NCT00354835)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
PAX30.51
PAX70.66

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS)

Probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 year in the study (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
Vincristine, Dactinomycin, Cyclophosphamide (VAC)0.6255
VAC Alternating With Vincristine, Irinotecan (VI)0.5874

[back to top]

Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 4

4-year EFS (probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 years in the study). (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
% Change in SUVmax From Baseline to Week 4 < 40%0.2857
% Change in SUVmax From Baseline to Week 4 >= 40%0.6364

[back to top]

Compare Event Free Survival (EFS) With Respect to the Level of % Change in FDG PET Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) at Week 15

4-year EFS (probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 4 years in the study) (NCT00354835)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
% Change in SUVmax From Baseline to Week 15 < 40%0.6667
% Change in SUVmax From Baseline to Week 15 >= 40%0.5686

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of disease progression using Kaplan-Meier median PFS time. (NCT00354978)
Timeframe: From baseline until first documented progression or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 75 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab12.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 6 Months

Patients surviving 6 months after treatment end (NCT00360828)
Timeframe: 6 months post treatment end

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Irinotecan Hydrochloride (HCI) Treatment6

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 12 Months

Patients surviving 12 months after last dose of drug (NCT00360828)
Timeframe: 12 months post treatment end

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Irinotecan Hydrochloride (HCI) Treatment6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Objective Response After 3 Cycles of Treatment

The intent was to have 63 evaluable participants to determine the Objective Response Rate utilizing Criteria for Response, Progression and Relapse according to the McDonald Criteria. A measurement is made of the maximal enhancing tumor diameter on a single axial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted section, and then the largest perpendicular diameter is measured on the same image. The product of the 2 diameters is calculated, and the measurements are repeated with each scan. Measurements from multiple lesions are summed. (NCT00360828)
Timeframe: 3 cycles (21 day cycles)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Irinotecan Hydrochloride (HCI) Treatment8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST Version 1.0

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the first dose to the documentation of progressive disease (PD), death, or lost to follow-up at last assessment visit. (NCT00361842)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Irinotecan - Naïve4.69
Irinotecan - Exposed3.48

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR) Per RECIST Version 1.0

The duration of overall response was measured from the time that measurement criteria were met for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease was objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). The duration of overall complete response was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for complete response until the first date that recurrent disease was objectively documented. (NCT00361842)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan - NaïveNA

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.0

Disease response was assessed using RECIST 1.0. Measurable disease and target lesions were determined prior to study entry. Changes in the largest diameter (unidimensional measurement) of the sum of the target tumor lesions were used in the RECIST criteria. Best response on study was classified as follows. Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumor. Partial Response (PR) at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Stable Disease (SD), steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or sufficient increase to qualify for PD. Progressive Disease (PD) at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since the treatment started. Appearance of new lesions also constituted progressive disease. (NCT00361842)
Timeframe: From date of first dose until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 48 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)
Irinotecan - Exposed001211
Irinotecan - Naïve02118

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure in Patients With Adenocarcinoma

Time to treatment failure (TTF) was measured from study entry until documented progression, death resulting from any cause, or end of protocol therapy because of unacceptable toxicity. The median TTF with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00381706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post-treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Adenocarcinoma (ECF + Cetuximab)5.6
Arm B: Adenocarcinoma (IC + Cetuximab)4.3
Arm C: Adenocarcinoma (FOLFOX + Cetuximab)6.7

[back to top]

Tumor Response Rate (Complete and Partial) in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Response was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria. Overall tumor response is the total number of CR and PRs in participants with squamous cell carcinoma who have received at least one cycle of therapy. (NCT00381706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post-treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ECF + Cetuximab)67
Arm B: Squamous Cell Carcinoma (IC + Cetuximab)13
Arm C: Squamous Cell Carcinoma (FOLFOX + Cetuximab)60

[back to top]

Response Rate (Complete and Partial) in Patients With Measurable Esophageal or GE Junction Adenocarcinoma

Response was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria: Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria. Overall tumor response is the total number of CR and PRs in participants with adenocarcinoma who have received at least one cycle of therapy. (NCT00381706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post-treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Adenocarcinoma (ECF + Cetuximab)61
Arm B: Adenocarcinoma (IC + Cetuximab)45
Arm C: Adenocarcinoma (FOLFOX + Cetuximab)54

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival in Patients With Adenocarcinoma

Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from study entry to progression or death of any cause. The median PFS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00381706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post-treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Adenocarcinoma (ECF + Cetuximab)7.1
Arm B: Adenocarcinoma (IC + Cetuximab)4.9
Arm C: Adenocarcinoma (FOLFOX + Cetuximab)6.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Patients With Adenocarcinoma

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from study entry to death of any cause. The median OS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00381706)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years post-treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Adenocarcinoma (ECF + Cetuximab)11.6
Arm B: Adenocarcinoma (IC + Cetuximab)8.6
Arm C: Adenocarcinoma (FOLFOX + Cetuximab)11.8

[back to top]

Descriptive Statistics for the Change of Perfusion in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Concurrently Measured With the Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)

The change of perfusion in magnetic resonance imaging is calculated by taking the difference between the Day-15 measurements and the Baseline measurements for patients who had the changes of VEGF-R2. The purpose of reporting the descriptive statistics is to provide the information for the correlation coefficients reported in the next section, Section 19. MR perfusion ratio is the ratio of the perfusion measurements in the tumor and the perfusion measurerement in comparative frontal while matter, which is the comparative healthy part of the brain. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15 (after 2 doses of Bevacizumab) of course 1

InterventionRatio (Mean)
High-grade Gliomas-1.60
Brain Stem Tumors-1.54

[back to top]

Number of Patients With High VEGF-A Expression at Baseline

The expression of Hypoxia inducible factor-2α, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), VEGF-A, and VEGF-R2 will be estimated by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections in the medulloblastoma,ependymoma and low grade glioma strata. Reported separately for each stratum. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Medulloblastoma2
Ependymoma5
Low Grade Glioma16

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Sustained Objective Responses

Cumulative incidence of sustained objective response provides a percentage of participants experiencing the event of interest at a given follow-up time point (for example, 6-months, 1-year, etc.) in the presence of competing events such as progressive disease or death, and it is estimated using the event data for both the event of interest and the competing events experienced by the study participants. In this sense, it is different than the incidence rates estimated in epidemiological studies in terms of 'incidences per 1000 person years. 6-month Cumulative incidence of sustained objective responses will be reported separately for each stratum. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From the first imaging after treatment up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
High-grade Gliomas0
Brain Stem Tumors0
Medulloblastoma0
Ependymoma0
Low Grade Glioma0.058

[back to top]

Correlation of the Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) From Baseline With the Change in Perfusion From Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Spearman correlation coefficient is used to measure the correlation of the changes in VEGF-R2 with the changes in perfusion ratios. The changes are calculated by values at Day 15 minus values at baseline for VEGF-2 in Section 17 above and perfusion in Section 18 above, respectively. The correlation coefficients are reported in each stratum separately. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15 (after 2 doses of Bevacizumab) of course 1

InterventionCorrelation Coefficient (Number)
High-grade Gliomas0.5
Brain Stem Tumors-0.50

[back to top]

Change in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) From Baseline to Day-15

The change in VEGF-R2 was calculated from baseline to the time of the 2nd dose (values of 24-48 hours after the 2nd dose at Day 15 - values of pre-dose 1 Day1, i.e., baseline). VEGF-R2 is measured in the relative phosphorylation score which is generated as a ratio of normalized phosphorylated VEGF-R2 versus normalized total VEGF-R2 protein. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24-48 hours after the 2nd dose of Bevacizumab in course 1

InterventionRatio (Median)
High-grade Gliomas-0.37
Brain Stem Tumors-0.21
Medulloblastoma-0.003
Ependymoma0.24
Low Grade Glioma1.70

[back to top]

Change in Perfusion Ratio Between the Baseline and Day 15 Brain Imaging

"Perfusion ratio obtained from magnetic resonance(MR) diffusion imaging may explain changes in the tumor after therapy. Changes in the perfusion ratio will be reported for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with MR diffusion imaging. The change was calculated from perfusion ratio at Baseline to perfusion ratio at Day 15(values of perfusion ratio at Day 15 - values of perfusion ratio at baseline). The higher of perfusion ratio is worse.~MR perfusion ratio is perfusion solid part of tumor from CBV divided by perfusion frontal while matter. There is no a unit available." (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 15

InterventionRatio (Median)
High-grade Gliomas-0.14
Brain Stem Tumors-1.98
Low Grade Glioma-0.42

[back to top]

Change in Diffusion Ratio Between the Baseline and Day 15 Brain Image

Diffusion ratio obtained from magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion imaging may explain changes in the tumor after therapy. Changes in the diffusion ratio will be reported for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with MR diffusion imaging. The change was calculated from diffusion ratio at Baseline to diffusion ratio at Day 15 (values of diffusion ratio at Day 15 -values of diffusion ration at baseline). The higher of diffusion ratio is better. MR diffusion ratio is the diffusion solid part of tumor divided by the diffusion frontal white matter. There is no a unit available. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline and day 15

InterventionRatio (Median)
High-grade Gliomas-0.34
Brain Stem Tumors-0.17
Ependymoma0.11
Low Grade Glioma-0.11

[back to top]

Association of Log-transformed Volume of Cystic Necrosis With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates

Using Cox Proportional Hazards Models, the association of cystic necrosis with progression-free survival will be investigated. Volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is performed to investigate surrogate markers of tumor growth. Volumes of cystic necrosis were longitudinal. As we are not comparing the strata or study arms, analyses will be done in each stratum separately, and thus we cannot report the Cox model results in the Statistical Analysis section and we consider these estimates 'descriptive' within each stratum. In this analysis, the hazard ratio is a relative measure of likelihood that a study participant experiences the event of interest compared to another participant who has a one-unit lower Log-transformed tumor volume based on cystic necrosis. The Cox survival model provides the mean hazard ratio along with its 95% confidence interval, which we report below. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study, OR up to 2 years

InterventionHazard Ratio (Mean)
High-grade Gliomas2.56
Brain Stem Tumors1.09

[back to top]

Association of Log-transformed Tumor Volume Based on FLAIR With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates

Using Cox proportional hazards models, the association of tumor volume based on FLAIR images with PFS will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with volume FLAIR measurements. Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging is performed to investigate surrogate markers of tumor growth. Volume FLAIR measurements were longitudinal. As we are not comparing the strata, analyses will be done in each stratum separately, and thus we cannot report the Cox model results in the Statistical Analysis section. We consider these estimates 'descriptive' within each stratum. In this analysis, the hazard ratio is a relative measure of likelihood that a study participant experiences the event of interest compared to another participant who has a one-unit lower Log-transformed tumor volume based on FLAIR. The Cox survival model provides the mean hazard ratio along with its 95% confidence interval, which we report below. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study OR up to 2 years

InterventionHazard Ratio (Mean)
High-grade Gliomas1.47
Brain Stem Tumors1.76

[back to top]

Association of Log-transformed Tumor Enhancing Volume With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates

Using Cox Proportional hazards Models, the association of Log-transformed tumor enhancing volume with progression-free survival will be investigated. Volumetric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is performed to investigate surrogate markers of tumor growth. Tumor enhancing volumes were longitudinal. As we are not comparing the strata or study arms, analyses will be done in each stratum separately, and thus we cannot report the Cox model results in the Statistical Analysis section and we consider these estimates 'descriptive' within each stratum. In this analysis, the hazard ratio is a relative measure of likelihood that a study participant experiences the event of interest compared to another participant who has a one-unit lower Log-transformed tumor enhancing volume. The Cox survival model provides the mean hazard ratio along with its 95% confidence interval, which we report below. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study, OR up to 2 years

InterventionHazard Ratio (Mean)
High-grade Gliomas1.65
Brain Stem Tumors1.16

[back to top]

Association of Log-transformed Tumor Diffusion Ratio With Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using Hazard Ratio Estimates

Using Cox Proportional Hazards Models, the association of tumor diffusion ratios with progression-free survival will be investigated. Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion imaging is performed to investigate surrogate markers of tumor growth. Tumor diffusion ratios were longitudinal. As we are not comparing the strata or study arms, analyses will be done in each stratum separately, and thus we cannot report the Cox model results in the Statistical Analysis section. And we consider these estimates 'descriptive' within each stratum. In this analysis, the hazard ratio is a relative measure of likelihood that a study participant experiences the event of interest compared to another participant who has a one-unit lower Log-transformed tumor diffusion ratio. The Cox survival model provides the mean hazard ratio along with its 95% confidence interval, which we report below. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

InterventionHazard Ratio (Mean)
High-grade Gliomas4.41
Brain Stem Tumors1.82

[back to top] [back to top]

Volume of Distribution

"Blood specimens were collected on the days listed for pharmacokinetic studies for Bevacizumab. These specimens were analyzed to produce steady-state plasma Bevacizumab concentration-time data in study participants. The concentration-time data were analyzed to provide an estimate of the volume of distribution. The data were collected but the analyses of the PK data were conducted by Genentech using a broader cohort of pediatric patients from multiple trials in the paper Bevacizumab dosing strategy in paediatric cancer patients based on population pharmacokinetic analysis with external validation published by British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology ,2016 volume 81(1):148-160. The estimates of the volume of distribution were calculated by the model described in the paper." (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline, Course 1 Day 1, Course 1 Day 15, Course 2 Day 1, Course 3 Day 1, Course 4 Day 1, and Course 5 Day 1

Interventionml (Mean)
Combined All Strata1729

[back to top]

Terminal Half-life

"Blood specimens were collected on the days listed for pharmacokinetic studies for Bevacizumab. These specimens were analyzed to produce steady-state plasma Bevacizumab concentration-time data in study participants. The concentration-time data were analyzed to provide an estimate of the PK parameters. The data were collected but the analyses of the PK data were conducted by Genentech using a broader cohort of pediatric patients from multiple trials in the paper Bevacizumab dosing strategy in paediatric cancer patients based on population pharmacokinetic analysis with external validation published by British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,2016 volume 81(1):148-160. The estimates of the terminal half-life were calculated by the method described in the paper." (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline, Course 1 Day 1, Course 1 Day 15, Course 2 Day 1, Course 3 Day 1, Course 4 Day 1, and Course 5 Day 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Combined All Strata125.2

[back to top]

Systemic Clearance

"Blood specimens were collected on the days listed for pharmacokinetic studies for Bevacizumab. These specimens were analyzed to produce steady-state plasma Bevacizumab concentration-time data in study participants. The concentration-time data were analyzed to provide an estimate of the systemic clearance. The data were collected but the analyses of the PK data were conducted by Genentech using a broader cohort of pediatric patients from multiple trials in the paper Bevacizumab dosing strategy in paediatric cancer patients based on population pharmacokinetic analysis with external validation published by British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2016 volume 81(1):148-160. The estimates of the systemic clearance were calculated by the model described in the paper." (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline, Course 1 Day 1, Course 1 Day 15, Course 2 Day 1, Course 3 Day 1, Course 4 Day 1, and Course 5 Day 1

Interventionml/h (Mean)
Combined All Strata9.43

[back to top]

Sustained Disease Stabilization Rate Associated With Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Patients With Recurrent or Progressive Low-grade Glioma (Stratum E)

Disease stabilization is defined as a complete response(CR) or partial response(PR) observed during the first four courses and sustained for 8 weeks; or stable disease (SD) sustained for 6 courses characterized by SD at the end of course 2, at the end of course 4 and at the end of course 6. CR is complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor. PR is >= 50% reduction in tumor size. SD is at least stable and maintenance corticosteroid dose not increased in neurologic examination. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From day 1 of treatment up to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Low Grade Glioma23

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by VEGF-R2 Expression

The association of VEGF-R2 expression with progression-free survival will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with VEGF-R2 measurements. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

InterventionHazard Ratio (Number)
Low Grade Glioma0.632

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by VEGF-A Expression

The association of VEGF-A expression with progression-free survival will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with VEGF-A measurements. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

InterventionHazard Ratio (Number)
Low Grade Glioma0.091

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by Hypoxia Inducible Factor-2alpha Expression

The association of hypoxia inducible factor-2alpha expression with progression-free survival will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with hypoxia inducible factor-2alpha measurements. The hazard ratio was reported for patients who had hypoxia inducible factor-2alpha expression. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

InterventionHazard Ratio (Number)
Low Grade Glioma1.36

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Hazard Ratio by Carbonic Anhydrase 9 (CA9) Expression

The association of CA9 expression with progression-free survival will be investigated for those strata that have a sufficient number of participants with CA9 measurements. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until the earliest of progressive disease, death, second malignancy or off study

InterventionHazard Ratio (Number)
Low Grade Glioma0.705

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-Free survival is the interval of time between of protocol treatment and minimum date of documentation of progressive Disease,second malignancy,death due to any cause, or date of last follow-up. Progressive neurologic abnormalities or worsening neurologic status not explained by causes unrelated to tumor progression,OR the appearance of new tumor OR a > 25% increase in the sum of the products of two longest perpendicular diameters of all measurable tumors. K-M method was used to estimate progression-free survival. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From start of treatment up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
High-grade Gliomas4.20
Brain Stem Tumors2.35
Medulloblastoma2.48
Ependymoma2.15

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate Sustained for ≥ 8 Weeks

Objective response is either a complete response or a partial response observed during the first four courses of treatment and sustained for 8 weeks. The objective response rate will be reported separately for patients with recurrent/progressive malignant glioma(Stratum A), recurrent/progressive instrinsic brain stem tumors(Stratum B), recurrent/progressive medulloblastoma(Stratum C), and recurrent/progressive ependymoma(Stratum D). CR is complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor. PR is >= 50% reduction in tumor size. This outcome measures is not defined for the Stratum E in the protocol. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: From day 1 of treatment up to 24 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
High-grade Gliomas0
Brain Stem Tumors0
Medulloblastoma0
Ependymoma0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With High VEGF-R2 Expression at Baseline

The expression of Hypoxia inducible factor-2α, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), VEGF-A, and VEGF-R2 will be estimated by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections in the medulloblastoma,ependymoma and low grade glioma strata. Reported separately for each stratum. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Medulloblastoma4
Ependymoma4
Low Grade Glioma13

[back to top]

Number of Patients With High Hypoxia Inducible Factor-2alpha Expression at Baseline

The expression of Hypoxia inducible factor-2α, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), VEGF-A, and VEGF-R2 will be estimated by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections in the medulloblastoma,ependymoma and low grade glioma strata. Reported separately for each stratum. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Medulloblastoma0
Ependymoma3
Low Grade Glioma7

[back to top]

Number of Patients With High Carbonic Anhydrase 9 Expression at Baseline

The expression of Hypoxia inducible factor-2α, carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), VEGF-A, and VEGF-R2 will be estimated by immunohistochemistry of paraffin sections in the medulloblastoma,ependymoma and low grade glioma strata. Reported separately for each stratum. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Medulloblastoma0
Ependymoma4
Low Grade Glioma2

[back to top]

Descriptive Statistics for the Changes in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 (VEGF-R2) Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) Concurrently Measured With the Changes in Perfusion From Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The changes in VEGF-R2 are calculated by values at Day 15 minus values at baseline for the patients who had the changes in perfusion from magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. The purpose of reporting descriptive statistics of changes of VEGF-R2 is to provide the information for the correlation coefficients in Section 19. (NCT00381797)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15 (after 2 doses of Bevacizumab) of course 1

InterventionRatio (Mean)
High-grade Gliomas-1.12
Brain Stem Tumors-1.20

[back to top]

Number of Participants With no Emesis and no Rescue Therapy Within 5 Days of Receiving FOLFOX and FOLFIRI in the First Cycle of Chemotherapy.

(NCT00381862)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Aprepitant and Palonosetron54

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Toxicity

All adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer InstituteCommon Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0. All 80 patients were assessable for toxicity at least for the first cycle. (NCT00387660)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A40
Arm B40

[back to top]

Median Survival of Patients Treated With This Regimen

The length of time from the start of treatment that half of the patients in a group of patients diagnosed with the disease are still alive. (NCT00387660)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A10
Arm B10

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria for target lesions and assessed by radiographic techniques. Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00387660)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A65
Arm B50

[back to top]

Toxicity Profile

Toxicities are assessed according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Toxicities are reported as the number of patients who experienced grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events after receiving at least one dose of on-study treatment. (NCT00391586)
Timeframe: 28 days after last on-study treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AcneAnorexiaConfusionDehydrationDiarrheaDyspneaFatigueNasal hemorrhageInsomniaKidney painLymphocyte count decreasedMuscle weaknessNeutrophil count decreasedDesquamating rashSyncopeThrombosis (clotting)
Erlotinib Followed by Chemotherapy1111238111112111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Toxicity as Measured by The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria v. 3.0.

Here is the number of participants with any toxicity, defined as any adverse events possibly, probably or definitely related to the investigational drugs. For the detailed list of investigational new drug (IND)-related toxicities and other serious adverse events, see the adverse event module. (NCT00393094)
Timeframe: 23 months (date of first enrollment to 1 month after last progression)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Enrollment Until Prior to Treatment27

[back to top]

Radiographic Response Rate (Anaplastic Glioma Participants)

Definition of response: complete response (CR) is the complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease. Partial response (PR) is greater than or equal to a 50% decrease compared to baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Stable/No response (SD, NR)does not qualify for CR, PR, or progression. Progression is a 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions (or two target lesions if too numerous over the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline. (NCT00393094)
Timeframe: 23 months (date of first enrollment to 1 month after last progression)

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Partial responseComplete responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
Bevacizumab & Irinotecan Anaplastic Glioma Pts: Enrollment003070

[back to top]

Radiographic Response Rate (Glioblastoma Multiforme Participants)

Definition of response: complete response (CR) is the complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease. Partial response (PR) is greater than or equal to a 50% decrease compared to baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Stable/No response (SD, NR)does not qualify for CR, PR, or progression. Progression is a 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions (or two target lesions if too numerous over the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline. (NCT00393094)
Timeframe: 23 months (date of first enrollment to 1 month after last progression)

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Partial responseComplete responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
Bevacizumab & Irinotecan Glioblastoma Multiforme: Enrollment001090

[back to top]

Radiographic Response Rate (Malignant Glioma Participants)

Definition of response: complete response (CR) is the complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease. Partial response (PR) is greater than or equal to a 50% decrease compared to baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Stable/No response (SD, NR)does not qualify for CR, PR, or progression. Progression is a 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions (or two target lesions if too numerous over the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease) using the same techniques as baseline. (NCT00393094)
Timeframe: 23 months (date of first enrollment to 1 month after last progression)

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Partial responseComplete responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
Enrollment Until Prior to Treatment0016.783.3

[back to top]

10-month Progression-Free Survival Rate

10-month progression-free survival rate is the probability of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 10-months from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. (NCT00394433)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 10 months.

Interventionprobability (%) (Number)
Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (TPCA)40.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive and estimate using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. (NCT00394433)
Timeframe: Patients in the study cohort were followed for a median of 12.2 month (up to 40 months).

Interventionmonths (Median)
Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (TPCA)14.9

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Patients alive and progression-free at last follow-up are censored. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. (NCT00394433)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment duration was a median of 6 cycles/18 weeks given 3-week cycle length (range 1-26 cycles).

Interventionmonths (Median)
Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (TPCA)8.9

[back to top]

Best Response

Best response on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria: Complete Response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Both require confirmation no fewer than 4 weeks apart. CR/PR assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Stable disease is defined as any condition not meeting above criteria. (NCT00394433)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment duration was a median of 6 cycles/18 weeks given 3-week cycle length (range 1-26 cycles).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (TPCA)2375

[back to top]

Complete and Partial Response Rate

(NCT00397904)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgression of Disease
Cetuximab, Cisplatin, and Irinotecan01411

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response of Complete Response or Partial Response, Investigator's Assessment

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed CR or confirmed PR. CR persisted on repeat imaging study ≥4 weeks after initial documentation of response. PR, in case of bidimensionally measurable disease, was a decrease by ≥50% of the sum of the products of the largest perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions as determined by 2 observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Best overall response could be recorded any time while the participant was receiving treatment. Investigator's assessment. (NCT00404495)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 Year (medulloblastoma), Baseline to 6 Weeks (high-grade glioma)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for Medulloblastoma34.9
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for High-Grade Glioma11.8

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD), the date of treatment discontinuation except completion of treatment, or date of death due to cancer. Investigator's assessment. (NCT00404495)
Timeframe: Baseline to Date of Treatment Failure (Up to 1 Year)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for Medulloblastoma3.8
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for High-Grade Glioma1.6

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time in months from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer, whichever came first. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7 multiplied by 4.33. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data met the criteria for PD). Investigator's assessment. (NCT00404495)
Timeframe: Baseline to Date of Progression (Up to 1 Year)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for Medulloblastoma5.6
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for High-Grade Glioma1.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response of Complete Response or Partial Response

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR). CR persisted on repeat imaging study at least (≥) 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. PR, for bidimensionally measurable disease, was a decrease by ≥50% of the sum of the products of the largest perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions as determined by 2 observations not less than 4 weeks apart. Best overall response recorded any time while the participant was receiving treatment. External Response Review Committee (ERRC) assessment. (NCT00404495)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 Year (medulloblastoma), Baseline to 6 Weeks (high-grade glioma)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for Medulloblastoma32.6
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for High-Grade Glioma0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Median duration (50%) of tumor response for participants with objective disease response: who have not progressed or died due to any cause; with a response and subsequent progression or death due to any cause for duration of response (DR). DR was defined as time from start of first documented objective tumor response (CR or PR) to first documented objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. DR (calculated in Weeks) = (the end date for DR minus first subsequent confirmed CR or PR plus 1) divided by 7. Investigator's assessment. (NCT00404495)
Timeframe: Baseline to Date of Tumor Response (Up to 1 Year)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for Medulloblastoma22.4
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for High-Grade Glioma36.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 7 multiplied by 4.33. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). Investigator's assessment. (NCT00404495)
Timeframe: Baseline to Date of Death (Up to 1 Year After Treatment)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for Medulloblastoma16.7
Temozolomide + Irinotecan for High-Grade Glioma9.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Progression Free at 6 Months With Malignant Gliomas

Progression-free Survival (PFS) measured as number of participants that are alive and progression-free at 6 months. (NCT00412542)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants With Recurrent Malignant Gliomas24

[back to top]

Disease Control

Disease control is defined as incidence of objective response or stable disease on study up to starting a new anti-tumor therapy. (NCT00418938)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 65 months.

,
Intervention% of participants (Number)
Wild-type KRAS (n=91,91)Mutant KRAS (n=36,32)
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI79.5266.67
Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI72.4152.94

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as time from first confirmed objective response to disease progression per modified RECIST version 1.0 (by central assessment). (NCT00418938)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 65 months.

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Wild-type KRAS (n=91,91)Mutant KRAS (n=36,32)
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI8.915.2
Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI12.710.2

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate is defined as incidence of either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on study up to starting a new anti-tumor therapy and will be based on modified RECIST version 1.0 (responder) by central assessment. (NCT00418938)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 65 months.

,
Intervention% of patients (Number)
Wild-type KRAS (n=91,91)Mutant KRAS (n=36,32)
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI19.283.33
Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI32.1811.76

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Subjects who have not died or are lost to follow-up at the analysis cutoff date will be censored at their last contact date. (NCT00418938)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 65 months.

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Wild-type KRAS (n=91,91)Mutant KRAS (n=36,32)
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI21.413.5
Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI18.08.7

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of first progression per modified RECIST version 1.0 (based on central review of the radiographic scans), or death within 60 days after the last evaluable tumor assessment or randomization date (whichever is later). (NCT00418938)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 65 months.

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Wild-type KRAS (n=91,91)Mutant KRAS (n=36,32)
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI9.26.4
Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI7.73.7

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to progression is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of radiographic disease progression per modified RECIST version 1.0 (per central assessment). (NCT00418938)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 65 months.

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Wild-type KRASMutant KRAS
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI9.47.4
Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI11.14.5

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of first confirmed objective response (NCT00418938)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 65 months.

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Wild-type KRAS (n=91,91)Mutant KRAS (n=36,32)
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI3.71.8
Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI2.12.2

[back to top]

Accuracy of Local PFS 6-mo Interpretation Using Central Review PFS-6 as the Reference Standard

Local reads were treated as the test and central reads were treated as the reference standard. Thus, a participant meeting the definition of progression on any standard MRI central interpretation (baseline visit, week 2, after every 2 cycles of treatment, and at termination of treatment) was considered positive for PFS-6. Therefore, a true positive is defined as a positive local interpretation for a subject with a positive central read. (NCT00433381)
Timeframe: baseline visit, week 2, after every 2 cycles of treatment, and at termination of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Local Read (Test)72402959Central Read (Reference)72402959
PFS-6 NegativePFS-6 Positive
Standard MRI Local and Central Evaluation62
Standard MRI Local and Central Evaluation41
Standard MRI Local and Central Evaluation48
Standard MRI Local and Central Evaluation55

[back to top]

Change in Perfusion MRI Markers at Week 8 as Predictors of 12mo Overall Survival (OS)

To assess the potential role of perfusion MRI as a prognostic indicator for 12-month OS based on the change in MRI markers evaluated before treatment and 8 weeks following initiation of protocol treatment. Percent change in mean tumor relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI normalized to white matter (nRCBV) and standardized rCBV (sRCBV) between baseline and week 8 are the prognostic indicators. (NCT00433381)
Timeframe: Baseline and 8 weeks

InterventionArea Under the Curve (AUC) (Number)
nRCBV (%change @ week8)sRCBV (%change @ week8)
DSC 8-week Participants0.4700.561

[back to top]

Change in Perfusion MRI Markers at Week 2 as Predictors of 12mo Overall Survival (OS)

To assess the potential role of perfusion MRI as a prognostic indicator for 12-month OS based on the change in MRI markers evaluated before treatment and 2 weeks following initiation of protocol treatment. Percent change in mean tumor relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI normalized to white matter (nRCBV) and standardized rCBV (sRCBV) between baseline and week 2 are the prognostic indicators. (NCT00433381)
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 Weeks

InterventionArea Under the Curve (AUC) (Number)
nRCBV (%change @ week2)sRCBV (%change @ week2)
DSC 2-week Participants0.850.825

[back to top]

Change in Perfusion MRI Markers at Week 16 as Predictors of 12mo Overall Survival (OS)

To assess the potential role of perfusion MRI as a prognostic indicator for 12-month OS based on the change in MRI markers evaluated before treatment and 16 weeks following initiation of protocol treatment. Percent change in mean tumor relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI normalized to white matter (nRCBV) and standardized rCBV (sRCBV) between baseline and week 16 are the prognostic indicators. (NCT00433381)
Timeframe: Baseline and 16 Weeks

InterventionArea Under the Curve (AUC) (Number)
nRCBV (%change @ week16)sRCBV (%change @ week16)
DSC 16-week Participants0.7620.905

[back to top]

Count/Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months for Bevacizumab and Temozolomide Arm

Progression defined as ≥ 25% increase in the size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor; or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. Percentage is calculated by taking the number of patients who have survived 6 months without progression of study disease after study registration in the numerator. The denominator consists of all patients except those who were found retrospectively to be ineligible or who were lost to follow-up after less than 6 months. (NCT00433381)
Timeframe: From randomization to six months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Bevacizumab and Temozolomide)23

[back to top]

Count/Percentage of Patients Progression-free at 6 Months for Bevacizumab and Irinotecan Hydrochloride Arm

Progression defined as ≥ 25% increase in the size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor; or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. Percentage is calculated by taking the number of patients who have survived 6 months without progression of study disease after study registration in the numerator. The denominator consists of all patients except those who were found retrospectively to be ineligible or who were lost to follow-up after less than 6 months. (NCT00433381)
Timeframe: From randomization to six months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm II (Bevacizumab and Irinotecan Hydrochloride)22

[back to top] [back to top]

Agreement Between Local Interpretation and Central Interpretation of Standard MRI

Local and central interpretations of the standard MRI were assessed for progression and survival at all available imaging (baseline visit, week 2, and after every 2 cycles of treatment, and at termination of treatment). Patients who suffer clinical progression without radiographic confirmation of progression were considered to have progressive disease in determination of PFS-6. Subjects participated in the MR substudies regardless of therapeutic intervention (NCT00433381)
Timeframe: baseline visit, week 2, after every 2 cycles of treatment, and at termination of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Local Read72402959Central Read72402959
PFS <= 6moPFS >= 6mo
Standard MRI Local and Central Evaluation62
Standard MRI Local and Central Evaluation41
Standard MRI Local and Central Evaluation55
Standard MRI Local and Central Evaluation48

[back to top]

Confirmed Tumor Response Rate (Proportion of Participants With Complete Response)

Evaluated using RECIST version 1.0. Confirmed tumor response rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) in two consecutive assessments at least 6 weeks apart. CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. The confirmed response rate is reported as the number of participants with confirmed responses divided by the number of evaluated participants. (NCT00433550)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
All Patients (6/6, 6/7, 7/7 UGT1A1 Genotype).38

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure is defined to be the time from the date of registration to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, toxicity, or refusal. If the patient is considered to have had a major treatment violation or is taken off study as a non-protocol failure, the patient will be censored on the date they are removed from treatment. Time to treatment failure will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT00433550)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Patients (6/6, 6/7, 7/7 UGT1A1 Genotype)6.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Time to disease progression is defined as the time from registration to the earlier of documentation of disease progression or death. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. The distribution of time to progression will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT00433550)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Patients (6/6, 6/7, 7/7 UGT1A1 Genotype)8.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival will be defined as the time from registration to death. Patients lost to follow-up for this endpoint will be censored at the date of last contact (i.e., last known alive). The distribution of overall survival will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT00433550)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Patients (6/6, 6/7, 7/7 UGT1A1 Genotype)13.4

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined for all evaluable patients who have achieved an objective response as the date at which the patient's objective status is first noted to be either a CR or PR to the date progression is documented. Duration of response will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT00433550)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Patients (6/6, 6/7, 7/7 UGT1A1 Genotype)9.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Tumor Response Rate)

Tumor response rate was defined as number of participants with overall best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) over number of protocol qualified participants using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) Guidelines. CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of LDs or complete disappearance of target lesions, with persistence (but not worsening) of 1 or more non-target lesions, with no new lesions appearing. Percentage of participants = (Number of participants with overall best response of CR or PR/Number of protocol qualified participants) x 100. (NCT00437268)
Timeframe: Baseline to measured progressive disease up to 13.2 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzastaurin+Irinotecan+Cetuximab7.7
Irinotecan+Cetuximab16.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months (PFS Rate)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the first date of progressive disease or death from any cause. For participants not known to have died as of the data cut-off date and who did not have progressive disease, PFS was censored at the date of last visit with adequate assessment. For participants who received subsequent anticancer therapy (after discontinuation from the study treatment) prior to disease progression or death, PFS was censored at the date of last visit with adequate assessment prior to the initiation of post-discontinuation anticancer therapy. The PFS probability values were multiplied by 100 to obtain the percentage values. (NCT00437268)
Timeframe: At 6 months from randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzastaurin+Irinotecan+Cetuximab26
Irinotecan+Cetuximab23

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Who Died

Clinically significant events were defined as serious and other non-serious AEs. Participants who died due to progressive disease (PD) or and adverse events (AEs) while on treatment and or died during the 30 day post-treatment are included. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT00437268)
Timeframe: Baseline to study completion (Cycle 31.5 [21 days/cycle] and 30-day safety follow-up)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Non-serious AEsSerious AEsDeaths Due to PDDeaths Due to AEsDeaths in 30-day follow-up
Enzastaurin+Irinotecan+Cetuximab138000
Irinotecan+Cetuximab136011

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) (Disease Control Rate)

"The overall disease control rate for each treatment arm was calculated as percent of participants with overall response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) over number of protocol qualified population. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least 20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions, and SD was defined as small changes that did not meet above criteria.~Percentage of participants = (Number of participants with overall best response of CR, PR, or SD/Number of protocol qualified participants) x 100." (NCT00437268)
Timeframe: Baseline to disease progression (up to 13.2 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Enzastaurin+Irinotecan+Cetuximab38.5
Irinotecan+Cetuximab50.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time in months from the date of study enrollment to the date of death from any cause. For participants not known to have died as of the cut-off date, OS was censored at the last contact date. (NCT00437268)
Timeframe: Randomization to date of death from any cause up to 21.9 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzastaurin+Irinotecan+Cetuximab8.5
Irinotecan+Cetuximab8.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was defined as the time from first objective status assessment of CR or PR to the first time of disease progression or death from any cause. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0) criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all tumor lesions and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of LDs or complete disappearance of target lesions, with persistence (but not worsening) of 1 or more non-target lesions, with no new lesions appearing. For participants who died, the duration of response was censored at death. For participants still alive, duration of response was censored at the last visit with adequate assessment. (NCT00437268)
Timeframe: Time of response to progressive disease up to 13.2 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Enzastaurin+Irinotecan+Cetuximab6.9
Irinotecan+Cetuximab12.6

[back to top]

Rate of Toxicity in Study Participants

Evaluation the safety and toxicities of protocol regimen as evidenced by the rate of serious adverse events in study participants. (NCT00449163)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab50

[back to top]

Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response)

Percentage of patients achieving complete response or partial response per RECIST criteria ver 1.0 (NCT00449163)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab67

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival in Months

Median number of months subjects achieved progression-free survival (NCT00449163)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab13

[back to top]

Overall Survival up to 2 Years

Percentage of patients with overall survival times of up to 2 years (NCT00449163)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab61

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life (EuroQol) EQ-5D Self-Report Questionnaire

"EQ-5D: participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problem); 3 indicates worst health state (eg, confined to bed). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain. Score is transformed and results in total score range -1.11 to 1.000; higher score indicates better health state." (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle thereafter until EOT/withdrawal

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1
FOLFIRI + Placebo0.040.040.030.050.050.09
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib0.020.020.020.030.000.01

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documentation of objective tumour progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: First dose of study treatment up to 30 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib33.6
FOLFIRI + Placebo36.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Confirmed Objective Response

Objective disease response: participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR was defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib124
FOLFIRI + Placebo128

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. OS data were censored on the day following the date of the last contact at which the patient was known to be alive. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib87.9
FOLFIRI + Placebo85.9

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

DR was defined as the time from the first objective documentation of CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 28 of Cycle 1 up to 30 months

InterventionWeeks (Median)
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib30.1
FOLFIRI + Placebo39.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol (EQ) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (EQ-VAS)

EQ-5D: participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle thereafter until EOT/withdrawal

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1
FOLFIRI + Placebo3.34.36.64.34.09.0
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib1.01.71.83.8-0.9-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MDASI-GI Symptom Interference Score

Symptom Interference score is comprised of the sum 6 function items from MDASI core (general activity, walking, work, mood, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life). Participant asked to rate how much symptoms have interfered in past 24 hours; each item rated from 0 to 10, with 0=did not interfere and 10=interfered completely; lower scores indicated better outcome (range: 0 to 60). (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle thereafter until EOT/withdrawal

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1
FOLFIRI + Placebo-1.3-1.7-1.2-0.2-1.7-1.0
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib0.0-0.10.2-0.52.13.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Monroe Dunaway (MD) Anderson Symptom Assessment Inventory of Gastrointestinal Symptoms (MDASI-GI) Symptom Intensity Score

Symptom Intensity score is comprised of the sum of 13 MDASI core items (ie, pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, distress, shortness of breath, remembering things, lack of appetite, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting, numbness or tingling). Participant asked to rate severity of each symptom at their worst in past 24 hours; each item rated from 0 to 10, with 0=symptom not present and 10=as bad as you can imagine; lower scores indicated better outcome (range: 0 to 130). (NCT00457691)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle thereafter until end of treatment (EOT)/withdrawal

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1
FOLFIRI + Placebo0.40.91.82.71.2-2.7
FOLFIRI + Sunitinib1.70.81.00.70.85.0

[back to top]

Median Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the delay between response (complete or partial) and disease progression according to RECIST V1.0. Therefore, this criterion can only be assessed in in subjects who have responded. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD (RECIST V1.0.). Progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD, or appearance of one or several new lesions (RECIST V1.0) Radiologic assessment was carried out every four cycles (8 weeks) with centralized external secondary review. (NCT00467142)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Folfiri and Bevacizumab9.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants in Objective Response (Partial or Complete Responses)

Objective response defined as complete or partial responses according to RECIST v1.0. Complete response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SLD (RECIST V1.0.).Radiologic assessment was carried out every four cycles (8 weeks) with centralized external secondary review. (NCT00467142)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Folfiri and Bevacizumab47.5

[back to top]

Patient Response

"Patient response to treatment:~Progressive disease (PD): >=20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesion(s), taking as reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started Complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions Partial response (PR): >=30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesion(s), taking as reference baseline sum LD Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD" (NCT00469898)
Timeframe: 1.66 months (average duration, on treatment date to best response date)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseNot AssessedNot EvaluablePartial ResponseProgressive DiseaseStable DiseaseUnknown
Therapeutic Intervention212271215

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to progression in months (NCT00469898)
Timeframe: 9.9 months (on study date to progression)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Therapeutic Intervention5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00469898)
Timeframe: On study date to death

InterventionMonths (Median)
Therapeutic Intervention9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events

Number of participants with adverse events, according to grade of event, using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0) grading system to assign a grade to each event (NCT00469898)
Timeframe: date off treatment or progression of disease, up to 18 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Therapeutic Intervention132629104

[back to top]

Toxicity

Number of patients with Grade 3 through 5 adverse events that are related to study drug. Only adverse events that are possibly, probably or definitely related to study drug are reported. (NCT00499369)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Albumin, serum-low (hypoalbuminemia)Alkaline phosphataseAnorexiaBilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)Colitis, infectious (e.g., Clostridium difficile)ConfusionConstipationCoughDehydrationDiarrheaDyspnea (shortness of breath)Edema: limbEdema: trunk/genitalEncephalopathyFatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)Febrile neutropeniaHemoglobinHemorrhage, GI - StomaHypertensionInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - Abdomen NOSInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - BloodInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - UTIInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - Ab NOSInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - BloodInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - MucosaInf w/normal ANC or Gr 1-2 neutrophils - UTILeukocytes (total WBC)LymphopeniaMagnesium, serum-low (hypomagnesemia)Mental statusMucositis/stomatitis (clinical exam) - Oral cavityMucositis/stomatitis (functional/symp) - Oral cavMucositis/stomatitis (functional/symp) - PharynxNasal cavity/paranasal sinus reactionsNauseaNeuropathy: sensoryNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)Pain - Pain NOSPhosphate, serum-low (hypophosphatemia)PlateletsPneumonitis/pulmonary infiltratesPotassium, serum-low (hypokalemia)Rash/desquamationRash: acne/acneiformRash: hand-foot skin reactionSodium, serum-low (hyponatremia)Thrombosis/thrombus/embolismVomiting
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab100101002300010210011101005001000000400110030000
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Higher Bevacizumab010010002301103100000000002110110030700000141001
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Lower Bevacizumab001000000210001210000010114000100010700202120000
Cohort II: Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab001100111500002011100000010000001100310000000101
Cohort II: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab010000000300000010000000002000000001301001020010

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is measured from date of registration to first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression free are censored at date of last contact. (NCT00499369)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab3.2
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Lower Bevacizumab4.2
Cohort I: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Higher Bevacizumab8.5
Cohort II: Chemotherapy + Cetuximab1.4
Cohort II: Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab5.6

[back to top]

Response Rate

Response rate defined as the proportion of subjects with confirmed partial or complete response as defined by the RECIST criteria. (NCT00544778)
Timeframe: First disease evaluation one month after the start of treatment and every 3 months there after, up to 2 years.

Interventionpercentage of patients responding (Number)
Arm 10

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. AEs may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions. (NCT00551213)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 22 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Robatumumab→Robatumumab49
Chemotherapy→Robatumumab15

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. AEs may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions. (NCT00551213)
Timeframe: Up to last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 18 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Robatumumab→Robatumumab6
Chemotherapy→Robatumumab3

[back to top]

Best Overall Tumor Response Per Investigator Review

Tumor response was assessed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using RECIST v 1.0 criteria at Screening, at every 8 weeks of robatumumab treatment during Period 2 and at post study. A sum of the longest diameter (LD) for all target lesions was calculated and reported as the baseline sum LD. Overall tumor responses were defined as: Complete Response (CR) - Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) - At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; Progressive Disease (PD) - At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; or Stable Disease (SD) - Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started. (NCT00551213)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 22 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNo post-Baseline assessment
Chemotherapy→Robatumumab0762
Robatumumab→Robatumumab110335

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Tumor Growth Rate

Tumor growth rate was assessed by CT or MRI scans using RECIST criteria at Screening, at every 8 weeks of robatumumab treatment and at post study. For Pre Baseline 1, tumor growth rate=(sum of longest diameter of target lesions at Baseline - the most recent prior to Baseline)/duration between Baseline and Pre Baseline. For all other cycles, tumor growth rate=(sum of longest diameter of target lesions at a cycle - Baseline)/ duration between Baseline and the cycle. The cycles presented below are relative to the first dose of robatumumab in Period 1. (NCT00551213)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to approximately 22 weeks

Interventionmm/day (Mean)
Pre Baseline 1 (n=46)Cycle 1 (n=24)Cycle 2 (n=25)Cycle 5 (n=25)Cycle 9 (n=7)
Robatumumab→Robatumumab0.490.070.410.530.19

[back to top]

Best Overall Tumor Response Per Central Review

Tumor response was assessed by CT or MRI scan using RECIST v1.0 criteria at Screening, at every 8 weeks of robatumumab treatment during Period 2 and at post study. A sum of the LD for all target lesions was calculated and reported as the baseline sum LD. Overall tumor responses were defined as: Complete Response (CR) - Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) - At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; Progressive Disease (PD) - At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; or Stable Disease (SD) - Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started. (NCT00551213)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 22 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNo post-Baseline assessment
Chemotherapy→Robatumumab0591
Robatumumab→Robatumumab010318

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a >20% Decrease in Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-Assessed Tumor Glucose Metabolism: Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) in the Target Lesion

FDG-PET was used in this study to detect the biological activity of modulation of the target within the tumor. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0 was used to select the target lesion. All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs were identified as target lesions and recorded and measured at Baseline. The changes in SUVmax were calculated using the formula: (endpoint SUVmax - baseline SUVmax)/baseline SUVmax as a percentage. If multiple lesions had been measured at a visit, percentages calculated for all target lesions were averaged to find the decrease during the treatment period per participant. FDG SUVmax responder was defined as participants with >20% decrease in SUVmax after the first cycle of robatumumab in Period 2. (NCT00551213)
Timeframe: After the first robatumumab dose in Period 2 (Up to approximately 4 weeks after first robatumumab dose in Period 1)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Robatumumab→Robatumumab7

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The duration of time from start of study treatment to death from any cause. (NCT00551421)
Timeframe: The duration of time from start of study treatment to death from any cause.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I3.7

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

The duration of time from start of study treatment to time of objective disease progression or death. (NCT00551421)
Timeframe: The duration of time from start of study treatment to time of objective disease progression or death.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I2.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate Defined as the Proportion of Patients With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR, Per RECIST Criteria (Phase II)

Objective tumor response rate defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response of CR or PR, per RECIST criteria (Phase II). (NCT00551421)
Timeframe: Best tumor response from time period of start of study treatment to study discontinuation.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Confirmed Partial ResponseBest Response of Stable DiseaseBest Response of Progressive Disease
Arm I142957

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"Overall Survival was the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Once disease progression was documented, participants were followed every 2 months for survival status, until death or until the study cutoff date, whichever came first. The final data cutoff date for the analysis of OS was the date when 863 deaths had occurred (07 February 2011).~OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Hazard Ratio was estimated using the Cox Proportional Hazard Model." (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization until the study data cut-off date, 07 February 2011 (approximately three years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo/FOLFIRI12.06
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI13.50

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC)

"PFS was the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of progression, or death from any cause if it occurs before tumor progression is documented. To evaluate disease progression, copies of all tumor imaging sets were systematically collected and assessed by the IRC.~PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Hazard Ratio was estimated using the Cox Proportional Hazard Model.~The analysis for PFS was performed as planned when 561 deaths (OS events) had occurred." (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization until the occurrence of 561 OS events, 06 May 2010 (approximately 30 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo/FOLFIRI4.67
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI6.90

[back to top]

Immunogenicity Assessment: Number of Participants With Positive Sample(s) in the Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay and in the Neutralizing Anti-drug Antibodies (NAb) Assay

Serum samples for immunogenicity assessment were analyzed using a bridging immunoassay to detect ADA. Positive samples in the ADA assay were further analyzed in the NAb assay using a validated, non-quantitative ligand binding assay. (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: Baseline, every other treatment cycle, 30 days and 90 days after the last infusion of aflibercept/placebo

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
At least one positive sample in the ADA assayAt least one positive sample in the NAb assay
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI81
Placebo/FOLFIRI182

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

"All AEs regardless of seriousness or relationship to study treatment, spanning from the first administration of study treatment until 30 days after the last administration of study treatment, were recorded, and followed until resolution or stabilization.~The number of participants with all treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE), serious adverse events (SAE), TEAE leading to death, and TEAE leading to permanent treatment discontinuation are reported." (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization up to 30 days after the treatment discontinuation or until TEAE was resolved or stabilized

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Serious TEAETEAE leading to DeathTEAE causing permanent treatment discontinuation
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI60629437164
Placebo/FOLFIRI5921982973

[back to top]

Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on the Tumor Assessment by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) Criteria

"The overall ORR was the percentage of evaluable participants who achieved complete response [CR] or partial response [PR] according to RECIST criteria version 1.0.~CR reflected the disappearance of all tumor lesions (with no new tumors)~PR reflected a pre-defined reduction in tumor burden~Tumors were assessed by the IRC using Computerized Tomography (CT) scans or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans; and an observed response was confirmed by repeated imaging after 4 - 6 weeks." (NCT00561470)
Timeframe: From the date of the first randomization until the study data cut-off date, 06 May 2010 (approximately 30 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo/FOLFIRI11.1
Aflibercept/FOLFIRI19.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Adverse Events (AEs)

"Adverse events of special interest include infusion reactions, integument toxicities, diarrhea, stomatitis, hypomagnesemia, and pulmonary, vascular, and cardiac toxicities. Infusion reactions were defined as 1. Prespecified signs and symptoms indicating a possible infusion reaction (derived from Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) definitions of allergic reaction/hypersensitivity and cytokine release syndrome/acute infusion reaction) with onset day coincident with any study drug infusion and which resolved the day of, or the day after, onset; 2. incidence of AE with terms consistent with the panitumumab US package insert (USPI) (any event within 24 hours of an infusion during the clinical study described as allergic reaction or anaphylactoid reaction, or any event occurring on the first day of dosing described as allergic reaction, anaphylactoid reaction, fever, chills, or dyspnea).~Data are summarized overall and by treatment phase." (NCT00563316)
Timeframe: The reporting time frame for Adverse Events is from first dose date to 30 days since the last dose date, until the data cut-off date of 16 July 2009. The median time frame is 5.7 months.

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse events of InterestIntegument ToxicitiesDiarrheaHypomagnesemiaStomatitis/Oral MucositisPulmonary ToxicityInfusion Reaction CTCAEInfusion Reaction USPIVascular ToxicityNeuro ToxicitiesCardiac ToxicityHematological Toxicities
Panitumumab + Irinotecan27252313139825322
Treatment Phase 1502000210010
Treatment Phase 2262412164002100
Treatment Phase 3924001500100
Treatment Phase 42624201387413122

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan

To analyze the effect, if any, that panitumumab had on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan, the Cmax of irinotecan administered alone (Cycle 1) and with concomitant panitumumab (Cycle 2) was measured. Plasma samples were assayed by a validated high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence method for the measurement of irinotecan. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 2 ng/mL. (NCT00563316)
Timeframe: Predose and at 10 minutes, and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the end of the irinotecan infusion at cycle 1 (irinotecan alone, week 1 day 1) and cycle 2 (irinotecan with panitumumab, week 3, day 1).

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Panitumumab + Irinotecan15701570

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Irinotecan

To analyze the effect, if any, that panitumumab had on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan, the AUClast of irinotecan administered alone (Cycle 1) and with concomitant panitumumab (Cycle 2) was measured. (NCT00563316)
Timeframe: Predose and at 10 minutes, and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the end of the irinotecan infusion at cycle 1 (irinotecan alone, week 1 day 1) and cycle 2 (irinotecan with panitumumab, week 3, day 1).

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Panitumumab + Irinotecan1190010600

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From the Time of Dosing to Infinity (AUCinf) for Irinotecan

To analyze the effect, if any, that panitumumab had on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan, the AUCinf of irinotecan administered alone (Cycle 1) and with concomitant panitumumab (Cycle 2) was measured. (NCT00563316)
Timeframe: Predose and at 10 minutes, and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the end of the irinotecan infusion at cycle 1 (irinotecan alone, week 1 day 1) and cycle 2 (irinotecan with panitumumab, week 3, day 1).

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Panitumumab + Irinotecan1200010700

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Who Are Progression-free at 12 Weeks From the Start of Second-line Therapy

The 12 week progression-free rate was defined as the percentage of patients that were alive and progression-free 12 weeks after start of second-line therapy. Disease progression was assessed per modified RECIST criteria, and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, in either primary or nodal lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00588900)
Timeframe: at 12 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Irinotecan + Cediranib60

[back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response

Pathological information will be available for all patients who receive surgery. If a patient is deemed unresectable based on clinical and radiological examination after the therapy, that patient will be counted as non-responder. The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). The subject's best response assignment will depend on the achievement of both measurement and confirmation criteria. We will also estimate the pathological complete response rates separately for each of these tumor types. Survival and disease-free survival will be estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. With an accrual rate of 3 patients a month, we expect the study to be completed in 18 months. (NCT00590031)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Carcinoma55

[back to top]

Evaluate Toxicity and Tolerability Including Surgical Morbidity and Mortality

(NCT00590031)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Carcinoma55

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing a Grade ≥ 4 Hematologic or Grade ≥ 3 Non-hematologic Toxicity

Number of times a grade ≥ 4 hematologic or grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicity was experienced (NCT00597402)
Timeframe: 55 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade ≥ 4 Hematologic ToxicitiesGrade ≥3 Non-hematologic Toxicities
Avastin, Radiation, Temozolomide, and Irinotecan2049

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing a Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemorrhage or a Systemic Hemorrhage

Number of times a CNS hemorrhage or systemic hemorrhage was experienced (NCT00597402)
Timeframe: 55 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Gr.2 Central Nervous System (CNS) HemorrhageGr.3 Central Nervous System (CNS) HemorrhageGr.4 Central Nervous System (CNS) HemorrhageGr.5 Central Nervous System (CNS) HemorrhageGr.2 Systemic HemorrhageGr.3 Systemic HemorrhageGr.4 Systemic HemorrhageGr.5 Systemic Hemorrhage
Avastin, Radiation, Temozolomide, and Irinotecan10101000

[back to top]

16-month Overall Survival (OS)

Percentage of participants surviving sixteen months from the start of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of death due to any cause. (NCT00597402)
Timeframe: 16 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Avastin, Radiation, Temozolomide, and Irinotecan64.8

[back to top]

12-month Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Percentage of participants surviving twelve months from the start of study treatment without progression of disease. PFS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of the first documented progression according to the Macdonald criteria, or to death due to any cause. (NCT00597402)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Avastin, Radiation, Temozolomide, and Irinotecan63.2

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Overall Response

Complete Response is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The best overall response was the best response recorded from the start of the study drug until disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). (NCT00598975)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
NKTR-102 100 mg/m2 + Cetuximab0327
NKTR-102 125 mg/m2 + Cetuximab0031
Total0358

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities

Number of patients with Dose Limiting Toxicities (NCT00598975)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DehydrationDiarrhoeaRenal Failure Acute
NKTR-102 100 mg/m2 + Cetuximab010
NKTR-102 125 mg/m2 + Cetuximab111
Total121

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities by NCI-CTCAE

Number of patients with Dose Limiting Toxicities by NCI-CTCAE (NCT00598975)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dehydration : Any gradeDehydration : Grade 3Diarrhoea : Any gradeDiarrhoea : Grade 3Renal Failure Acute : Any gradeRenal Failure Acute : Grade 4
NKTR-102 100 mg/m2 + Cetuximab001100
NKTR-102 125 mg/m2 + Cetuximab111111
Total112211

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Have a Clinical or Laboratory Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade 3 to 5 Toxicity

An adverse event (AE) was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure that may or may not be considered related to the medical treatment or procedure. (Grade 3=Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care activities of daily living. Grade 4=Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5=Death related to AE.) Participants were monitored for AEs until the earlier of study discontinuation or 30 days after dalotuzumab/placebo discontinuation. AE grades were assessed using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) CTCAE, version 3.0. (NCT00614393)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to 33 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Q1W (DB)82.8
Dalotuzumab 15 mg/kg/7.5 mg/kg Q2W (OL)100.0
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Q1W (OL)90.0
Dalotuzumab 15 mg/kg/7.5 mg/kg Q2W (DB)81.1
Placebo + Cetuximab + Irinotecan (DB)75.8

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The PFS of participants with metastatic CRC expressing the wtKRAS genotype was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (RECIST 1.0) as documented by an independent core laboratory, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as either a 20% or greater relative increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions OR an absolute increase of at least 5mm in the sum of lesions or the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. (NCT00614393)
Timeframe: Up to last dose of study drug (Up to 32 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Q1W (DB)3.9
Dalotuzumab 15 mg/kg/7.5 mg/kg Q2W (DB)5.4
Placebo + Cetuximab + Irinotecan (DB)5.6

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Dalotuzumab in Combination With Cetuximab + Irinotecan Versus ORR of Cetuximab + Irinotecan Alone in Participants With Wild Type of Colorectal Cancer

ORR, using RECIST 1.0, was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had a confirmed Complete Response (CR; disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR; at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) at any time during the study, based on central radiology review. (NCT00614393)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks (Up to 32 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Q1W (DB)21.6
Dalotuzumab 15 mg/kg/7.5 mg/kg Q2W (DB)23.9
Placebo + Cetuximab + Irinotecan (DB)26.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinue Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure that may or may not be considered related to the medical treatment or procedure. The percentage of participants who discontinued study drug due to an AE is presented. (NCT00614393)
Timeframe: Up to last dose of study drug (Up to 32 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Q1W (DB)11.1
Dalotuzumab 15 mg/kg/7.5 mg/kg Q2W (OL)25.0
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Q1W (OL)30.0
Dalotuzumab 15 mg/kg/7.5 mg/kg Q2W (DB)7.2
Placebo + Cetuximab + Irinotecan (DB)11.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The OS of participants with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) expressing the KRAS wild-type (wtKRAS) tumor genotype (indicating no detection of KRAS mutation) was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. (NCT00614393)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after last dose of study drug (Up to 35 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Q1W (DB)10.8
Dalotuzumab 15 mg/kg/7.5 mg/kg Q2W (DB)11.6
Placebo + Cetuximab + Irinotecan (DB)14.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experience an AE of Infusion Site Reaction

The percentage of participants who experienced an AE of infusion site reaction is presented. (NCT00614393)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to 33 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Q1W (DB)0.0
Dalotuzumab 15 mg/kg/7.5 mg/kg Q2W (OL)12.5
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Q1W (OL)0.0
Dalotuzumab 15 mg/kg/7.5 mg/kg Q2W (DB)0.0
Placebo + Cetuximab + Irinotecan (DB)0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). CR are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. PR are those with at least 30 percent decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions, with non target lesions not increased or absent. (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation from the study due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks up to 130 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI24.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI23.5
Axitinib + FOLFOX19.4
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX20.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MDASI-D Symptom Interference Score at Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of Every Odd-numbered Cycle Throughout the Study and End of Treatment (Cycle 65) or Withdrawal

Symptom Interference score is comprised of the average of 6 items on feeling or function from the MDASI-D core (general activity, mood, work, relations with others, walking, and enjoyment of life) and ranges from 0 to 10. Participants were asked to rate how much symptoms have interfered in last week; each item rated from 0 to 10, with 0 = did not interfere and 10 = interfered completely. Lower scores indicated better outcome. Total average score range: 0 to 10. (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of cycle 2-5, Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle throughout the study and end of treatment (cycle 65) or withdrawal

,,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=39,46,35,33)Change at Cycle 2/Day 1 (n=35, 39, 34, 28)Change at Cycle 3/Day 1 (n=36,36,33,26)Change at Cycle 4/Day 1 (n=29,37,32,25)Change at Cycle 5/Day 1 (n=28,29,24,24)Change at Cycle 7/Day 1 (n=26,30,22,20)Change at Cycle 9/Day 1 (n=18,25,19,17)Change at Cycle 11/Day 1 (n=15,24,16,15)Change at Cycle 13/Day 1 (n=13,19,15,10)Change at Cycle 15/Day 1 (n=7,17,12,8)Change at Cycle 17/Day 1 (n=6,11,11,7)Change at Cycle 19/Day 1 (n=6,10,9,5)Change at Cycle 21/Day 1 (n=6,9,7,4)Change at Cycle 23/Day 1 (n=5,7,6,4)Change at Cycle 25/Day 1 (n=5,7,6,3)Change at Cycle 27/Day 1 (n=2,7,3,3)Change at Cycle 29/Day 1 (n=2,5,2,3)Change at Cycle 31/Day 1 (n=1,5,2,2)Change at Cycle 33/Day 1 (n=1,3,2,1)Change at Cycle 35/Day 1 (n=0,4,1,1 )Change at Cycle 37/Day 1 (n=0,4,0,1)Change at Cycle 39/Day 1 (n=0,2,0,1)Change at Cycle 41/Day 1 (n=0,2,0,1)Change at Cycle 43/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,1)Change at Cycle 45/Day 1 (n=0,0,0,1 )Change at Cycle 47/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 49/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 51/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 53/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 55/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 57/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 59/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 61/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 63/Day 1 (n=0,0,0,0)Change at Cycle 65/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at end of treatment (n=21,29,26,21)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI2.10.81.30.81.00.71.11.01.12.32.42.11.72.21.61.63.24.54.5NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA1.3
Axitinib + FOLFOX2.40.10.30.20.80.40.60.81.3-0.10.70.30.40.9-0.6-1.6-1.3-0.1-0.8-1.2NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA1.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI1.70.90.3-0.20.40.40.30.30.70.90.70.81.0-0.30.50.90.0-0.5-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.3NA-0.2-0.3-0.3-0.2-0.30.0-0.20.0NA-0.21.0
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX2.8-0.5-0.20.50.30.00.3-0.20.71.32.12.42.11.41.41.31.31.20.33.31.32.01.51.82.5NANANANANANANANANANA1.2

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Time in months from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was Death)." (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation from the study due to any cause, assessed every 8 week up to 130 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI5.72
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI6.87
Axitinib + FOLFOX7.59
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX6.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in MD Anderson Symptoms Inventory Diarrhea (MDASI-D) Symptom Severity Score at Day 1 of Cycles 2-5, Day 1 of Every Odd-numbered Cycle Throughout the Study and End of Treatment (Cycle 65) or Withdrawal

Symptom severity score is comprised of average of 14 MDASI-D core items (pain, fatigue, nausea, disturbed sleep, distress, shortness of breath, remembering things, lack of appetite, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting, numbness or tingling and diarrhea) and ranges from 0 to 10. Participants were asked to rate severity of each symptom at their worst in last week; each item rated from 0 to 10, with 0 = symptom not present and 10 = as bad as you can imagine. Lower scores indicated better outcome. Total average score range: 0 to 10. (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of cycles 2- 5, Day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle throughout the study and end of treatment (cycle 65) or withdrawal

,,,
InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=39,46,35,33)Change at Cycle 2/Day 1 (n=35, 39, 34,28)Change at Cycle 3/Day 1 (n=36,36,33,26)Change at Cycle 4/Day 1 (n=29,37,32,25)Change at Cycle 5/Day 1 (n=28,29,24,24)Change at Cycle 7/Day 1 (n=26,31,22,20)Change at Cycle 9/Day 1 (n=19,26,19,17)Change at Cycle 11/Day 1 (n=15,24,16,15)Change at Cycle 13/Day 1 (n=13,19,15,10)Change at Cycle 15/Day 1 (n=7,17,12,8)Change at Cycle 17/Day 1 (n=6,11,11,7)Change at Cycle 19/Day 1 (n=6,10,9,5)Change at Cycle 21/Day 1 (n=6,9,7,4)Change at Cycle 23/Day 1 (n=5,7,6,4)Change at Cycle 25/Day 1 (n=5,7,6,3)Change at Cycle 27/Day 1 (n=2,7,3,3)Change at Cycle 29/Day 1 (n=2,5,2,3)Change at Cycle 31/Day 1 (n=1,5,2,2)Change at Cycle 33/Day 1 (n=1,3,2,1)Change at Cycle 35/Day 1 (n=0,4,1,1)Change at Cycle 37/Day 1 (n=0,4,0,1)Change at Cycle 39/Day 1 (n=0,2,0,1)Change at Cycle 41/Day 1 (n=0,2,0,1)Change at Cycle 43/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,1)Change at Cycle 45/Day 1 (n=0,0,0,1 )Change at Cycle 47/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 49/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 51/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 53/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 55/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 57/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 59/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 61/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at Cycle 63/Day 1 (n=0,0,0,0)Change at Cycle 65/Day 1 (n=0,1,0,0)Change at end of treatment (n=21,29,27,22)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI2.10.60.80.80.50.71.11.01.00.82.01.31.12.62.22.32.84.95.0NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA0.7
Axitinib + FOLFOX1.90.70.30.50.90.60.61.00.90.50.90.80.90.40.20.3-0.8-0.3-0.80.4NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA1.3
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI1.80.50.20.00.10.0-0.20.10.10.20.40.50.5-0.30.10.4-0.2-0.4-0.6-0.4-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.4NA-0.4-0.5-0.4-0.4-0.3-0.3-0.3-0.2NA-0.40.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX2.00.00.20.50.40.20.80.10.81.01.71.41.61.01.01.10.90.90.52.41.01.01.42.02.2NANANANANANANANANANA0.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.4. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death). (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline until death or up to 1 year after the randomization of last participant

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI12.9
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI15.7
Axitinib + FOLFOX17.1
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX14.1

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.4. DR was calculated for the subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response. (NCT00615056)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or discontinuation from the study due to any cause, assessed every 8 weeks up to 130 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Axitinib + FOLFIRI7.52
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI12.29
Axitinib + FOLFOX10.15
Bevacizumab + FOLFOX10.94

[back to top]

Overall Time of Survival

Time from initiation of study participation until death (NCT00617539)
Timeframe: Time from initiation of study participation until death or up to 3 years

InterventionDays (Median)
Irinotecan and Temozolomide146

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Objective Treatment Response (Complete or Partial) in the CNS

Imaging was performed at 8-week intervals to assess response to treatment. Patients with known or suspected leptomeningeal disease were deemed to have a complete response if CSF cytology converted to negative (if positive at baseline) and all meningeal enhancement or nodularity of brain and/or spine MRI resolved. A modified RECIST 1.0 criteria was used to assess CNS response for patients with new or progressing brain metastases. In this modified RECIST criteria, CNS lesions <1cm were not considered measurable, but were considered evaluable for response and progression. Progressive disease for patients with lesions <1 cm was defined as follows: growth of a lesion from less than or equal to 5 mm to greater than or equal to 10mm; or, growth of a 6-9 mm lesion by at least 5 mm in the case of non-target parenchymal brain metastases. (NCT00617539)
Timeframe: Baseline scan prior to study entry was performed within 14 days of cycle 1 day 1, then every 8 weeks from then until disease progression or up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Irinotecan and Temozolomide2

[back to top]

Number of Patients Whose Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) Decreased From >5 to <5 CTCs Per 7.5 mL

CTCs were measured in blood using the Cellsearch(R) assay in 14 of the 20 patients measured at baseline (NCT00617539)
Timeframe: CTCs drawn on cycle 1 day 1, collection at 8 week intervals on patients who did not progress on their 8 week scans up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Irinotecan and Temozolomide1

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing a Clinical Benefit

The number of patients experiencing a clinical benefit is the sum of patients with an objective response plus patients with stable disease at ≥ 16 weeks from cycle 1 day 1 (first day of treatment). If a patient did not come back for a follow up scan after clinical deterioration, then they were only considered stable up to the time of the last scan they had per protocol. (NCT00617539)
Timeframe: From 1 day 1 (first day of treatment) every 8 weeks until scan shows disease progression or up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Irinotecan and Temozolomide7

[back to top]

Time to First Progression in CNS

"Imaging at 8-week intervals to assess response to treatment. A modified RECIST 1.0 criteria was used to assess response and time to progression in the CNS for patients with progressing brain metastases. In this modified RECIST criteria, CNS lesions <1cm were not considered measurable, but were considered evaluable for response and progression. Progressive disease for patients with lesions <1 cm was defined as follows: growth of a lesion from less than or equal to 5 mm to greater than or equal to 10mm; or, growth of a 6-9 mm lesion by at least 5 mm in the case of non-target parenchymal brain metastases.~If patient did not come back for a follow up scan after clinical deterioration, patient was only considered stable up to the time of the last scan per protocol and time to progression would be from cycle 1 day 1 to the last scan they completed that was stable." (NCT00617539)
Timeframe: Baseline scan prior to study entry was performed within 14 days of cycle 1 day 1, then every 8 weeks from then until disease progression or up to 2 years

InterventionDays (Median)
Irinotecan and Temozolomide70

[back to top]

Patient Response

Number of patients in each response category according to RECIST criteria: Progressive disease (PD): >=20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesion(s), taking as reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response (PR): >=30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesion(s), taking as reference baseline sum LD. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD. (NCT00639769)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after last chemotherapy treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseProgressive DiseaseStable DiseaseComplete response
Therapeutic Intervention111560

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Each Worst-grade Toxicity

Number of patients with worst-grade toxicity response of each grade (grade 1 to 5) following NCI Common Toxicity Criteria, with grade 1=mild adverse event; 2=moderate adverse event; 3=severe and undesirable adverse event; 4=life-threatening or disabling adverse event; 5=death (NCT00639769)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after last chemotherapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No. of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 1No. of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 2No. of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 3No. of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 4No. of patients with worst-grade toxicity of 5
Therapeutic Intervention21221101

[back to top]

Response Rates of Radiographically Measurable Disease

The primary outcome measure will be the response rates of radiographically measurable disease. Response rate of disease will be assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT scan: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD), >= 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease. (NCT00642746)
Timeframe: Disease response assessed after every 2 Treatment Cycles, or around 8 weeks.

,
InterventionNumber of Patients (Number)
Best Outcome - Complete ResponseBest Outcome - Partial ResponseBest Outcome- Stable DiseaseBest Outcome - Progressive Disease
FOLFIRI With Erlotinib0154
FOLFOX With Erlotinib0010

[back to top]

Time to Second Progression (From Start of First-Line Regimen)

"Number of days from the initiation of first line treatment to first documented progression. Progression will be assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT scan: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD), >= 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease.~Progression free survival (time to progression or death, whichever occurs first) is the same as time to progression as all of the patients in this trial progressed." (NCT00642746)
Timeframe: Documented by Follow-up CT scans following first line treatment, average of 225 days.

InterventionDays (Median)
FOLFIRI With Erlotinib83
FOLFOX With Erlotinib125

[back to top]

Second-line Progression Free Survival

Time to disease progression from start of second-line experimental regimen. Disease progression will be measured per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT scan: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >= 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD), >= 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease. (NCT00642746)
Timeframe: Upon completion of follow-up, for an average of 99 days following the initiation of study treatment.

InterventionDays (Median)
FOLFIRI With Erlotinib83
FOLFOX With Erlotinib125

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"PFS was defined as time from enrollment date to date of first radiologically observed progression or death (whichever comes first) during the combination therapy phase or over the entire treatment strategy.~Per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and the quartiles and event rates at various weeks presented with 95% CIs." (NCT00655499)
Timeframe: Up to 20 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall PeriodConfirmed wild-type KRAS populationAll wild-type populationPatient with KRAS, NRAS or BRAF mutations
Panitumumab Combined With Irinotecan5.56.38.71.9

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Per the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (m-RECIST) for target lesions and radiogically assessed (CT Scans; optionally MRI): confirmed complete (CR; Disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR; At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions), or stable disease (SD; Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression, taking as reference the nadir longest diameter since the treatment started) while on the combination therapy treatment phase or over the entire treatment strategy. DCR = CR / PR / SD (NCT00655499)
Timeframe: Up to 20 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall periodConfirmed wild-type KRAS populationAll Wild-type populationPatients with KRAS, NRAS or BRAF mutation
Panitumumab Combined With Irinotecan63.166.780.521.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"OS was defined as time from inclusion to death (from any cause or to the last date the patient was known to be alive) during the combination therapy phase or over the entire treatment strategy.~Per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and the quartiles and event rates at various weeks presented with 95% CIs." (NCT00655499)
Timeframe: Up to 20 months

Interventionpercentage of participant (Number)
Study populationConfirmed wild-type KRAS populationAll wild-type populationPatients with KRAS, NRAS or BRAF mutation
Panitumumab Combined With Irinotecan9.711.915.84.6

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) During the Combination Therapy Phase

Per the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (m-RECIST) for target lesions and radiogically assessed (CT Scans; optionally MRI): Complete Response (CR; Disappearance of all target lesions) or Partial Response (PR; At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions) during the combination therapy phase.Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT00655499)
Timeframe: Up to 20 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Whole study populationConfirmed wild-type KRAS populationAll wild-type populationPatients with KRAS, NRAS or BRAF mutations
Panitumumab Combined With Irinotecan29.235.246.30

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Sunitinib

(NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionhours (Mean)
Sunitinib TmaxSU012662 TmaxTotal (sunitinib + SU0122662) Tmax
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI646

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Irinotecan

(NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionhours (Mean)
Irinotecan tmaxSN-38 tmax
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI24

[back to top]

Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of Irinotecan

Terminal phase half-life of irinotecan was calculated as ln 2/ kel. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionhours (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI5.36

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events According to Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE).

Any untoward medical occurrence in a patient who received study drug was considered an adverse event (AE), without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE): those which occurred or worsened after baseline. An adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be a serious adverse event (SAE): death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles (1 cycle = 6 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Treatment emergent adverse eventsSerious adverse eventsCTCAE grade 3 or 4 adverse eventsCTCAE grade 5 adverse events
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI7132701

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DR)

DR is defined as the time from the first objective documentation of complete or partial response that is subsequently confirmed to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The definition of censorship is the same as PFS. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles (1 cycle = 6 weeks)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI28.3

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan

Plasma samples were assessed at prior to initiation of irinotecan (and l-leucovorin) infusion, 1, 2 (predose for 5-FU bolus), 4, 8, and 24 hours after initiation of irinotecan infusion, and Cmax of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 were determined. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Irinotecan CmaxSN-38 Cmax
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI196325.1

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) and Predose Concentration (Ctrough) of Sunitinib.

Plasma concentrations were assessed at predose, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours postdose and Cmax and Ctrough of sunitinib, its metabolite SU012662, and the total (sunitinib + SU0122662) were determined. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib CmaxSunitinib CtroughSU012662 CmaxSU012662 CtroughTotal (sunitinib + SU0122662) CmaxTotal (sunitinib + SU0122662) Ctrough
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI54.341.815.811.370.053.1

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC Last) and Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC ∞) of Irinotecan

"AUC last of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38 were calculated using the Linear/Log trapezoidal method.~AUC∞ of irinotecan was calculated using following equation; AUC last+(C*t/kel), where Ct* is the estimated concentration at the time of the last quantifiable concentration, kel is terminal phase rate constant that is estimated as the absolute value of the slope of a linear regression during the terminal phase of the natural-logarithm (ln) transformed concentration-time profile." (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Irinotecan AUC lastIrinotecan AUC ∞SN-38 AUC last
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI1310013800274

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC 0-24) of Sunitinib

AUC 0-24 was determined using the Linear/Log trapezoidal method. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng.h/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib AUC 0-24SU012662 AUC 0-24Total (sunitinib + SU0122662) AUC 0-24
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI11613461507

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Irinotecan

Vss was calculated using following equation: CL x mean residence time (MRT), where MRT = the area under the first moment curve from zero time to infinity (AUMC 0-∞)/AUC 0-∞- (infusion time/2), AUMC 0-∞ = the area under the first moment curve from zero time to time t (AUMC t)+ ((t x Ct*)/ kel) + (Ct* / kel^2), AUMC t is calculated using the linear trapezoidal method. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

InterventionL (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI160

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

"PFS is defined as the time from the date of enrollment to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.~PFS data was censored on the day following the date of the last tumor assessment documenting absence of progressive disease for patients who 1) were given anti-tumor treatment other than the study treatment prior to observing objective tumor progression; 2) were removed from the study prior to documentation of objective tumor progression; and 3) were ongoing at the time of the analysis." (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles (1 cycle = 6 weeks)

Interventionweeks (Median)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI28.9

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Css) of 5-FU

Concentration at 22 hour post start of 5-FU infusion were to be used as Css if 5-FU concentrations suggested steady state at 22 hours time point. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI650

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Presented Objective Response: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response of either a confirmed complete (CR) or partial response (PR) relative to the number of participants in FAS. Based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and PR is defined as a greater than or equal to 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesion. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Up to 11 cycles (1 cycle = 6 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Median)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI36.6

[back to top]

Clearance of Irinotecan

CL is calculated as dose divided by AUC 0-∞ (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

InterventionL/hour (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI23.0

[back to top]

Apparent Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Sunitinib

Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose (apparent oral clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Clearance was estimated from population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood. (NCT00668863)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 15

InterventionL/hour (Mean)
Sunitinib 37.5 mg (Schedule 4/2) + FOLFIRI32.9

[back to top]

Associations Between MTHFR Diplotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Poor Risk Group)

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the Puregene DNA isolation kit. (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CA-CACA-CCCA-TACC-CCCC-TACC-TCTA-TA
With Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis4342300
Without Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis4741201

[back to top]

Associations Between MTHFR Genotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)

"Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the Puregene DNA isolation kit.~MTHFR gene = methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (NAD(P)H)" (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CC (MTHFR 677C>T)CT (MTHFR 677C>T)TT (MTHFR 677C>T)
With Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis5124
Without Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis34347

[back to top]

Associations Between MTHFR Genotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the Puregene DNA isolation kit. (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AA (MTHFR 1298A>C)AC (MTHFR 1298A>C)CC (MTHFR 1298A>C)
With Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis1542
Without Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis26418

[back to top]

Associations Between MTHFR Genotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Poor Risk Group)

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the Puregene DNA isolation kit. (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CC (MTHFR 677C>T)CT (MTHFR 677C>T)TT (MTHFR 677C>T)AA (MTHFR 1298A>C)AC (MTHFR 1298A>C)CC (MTHFR 1298A>C)
With Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis970862
Without Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis1261991

[back to top]

Associations Between MTHFR Haplotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the Puregene DNA isolation kit. (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
677C-1298A677C-1298C677T-1298A
With Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis12616
Without Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis334940

[back to top]

Associations Between MTHFR Haplotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Poor Risk Group)

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the Puregene DNA isolation kit. (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
677C-1298A677C-1298C677T-1298A
With Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis1187
Without Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis15107

[back to top]

Toxicities by Genotype Group (Good Risk Versus Poor Risk)

Grade 3 to 4 toxicities related to treatment and surgery using CTC Version 2.0. (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NauseaVomitingDiarrheaDehydrationMucositisGI bleedIleitisEnteritisDyspneaNeutropeniaAnemiaPainPerforationPelvic abscessPPECrohn's flareSyncopeRashFatigueAtrial fibrillationInfectionHeadacheSmall bowel obstruction
Good Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)001734201103320012211111
Poor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)111671010013412100000100

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival

Analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Models. (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year2 years3 years
Good Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)85.278.373.4
Poor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)87.080.572.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Models. (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
1 year2 years3 years
Good Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)96.980.678.2
Poor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)94.394.383.6

[back to top]

Rate of Tumor Downstaging Compared With Historical Controls.

"Tumor downstaging (DS) is defined as a decrease in the T stage of the primary tumor by at least 1.~Historical studies demonstrate a DS rate of 45%." (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: 1 year after enrollment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Good Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)64.4
Poor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)64.5

[back to top]

Complete Response Rates

"Complete tumor response is defined as the absence of any viable tumor in the rectum (ypT0).~Pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as the absence of any viable tumor in the rectum or in the perirectal lymph nodes (ypT0N0).~pCR rate of historical controls is 8%-14%." (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: 1 year after enrollment

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ypT0pCR
Good Risk (TYMS*2/*2, *2/*3, *2/*4)2018.9
Poor Risk (TYMS*3/*3, *3/*4)41.935.5

[back to top]

Associations Between MTHFR Diplotypes and Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis (Good Risk Group)

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood using the Puregene DNA isolation kit. (NCT00682786)
Timeframe: First day of treatment through 30 days after completion of surgery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CA-CACA-CCCA-TACC-CCCC-TACC-TCTA-TA
With Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis2192304
Without Grade 3-4 Diarrhea and/or Mucositis1314672717

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Still alive for a certain period of time after they were diagnosed with or started treatment (NCT00693719)
Timeframe: Measured from the start of protocol therapy until the date of death from any cause or will be censored at the date the patient was last known to be alive, assesed up to 13 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Etoposide/Irinotecan149

[back to top]

Median Time to Progression

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT00693719)
Timeframe: Measured time from the start of treatment to the time the patient is first recorded as having disease progression or dies. If no progression or death while being followed via tumor assessment, censored at last date known alive, assesed up to 13 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Etoposide/Irinotecan149

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of study entry until the date of death. (NCT00695292)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan, Carboplatin, SunitinibNA

[back to top] [back to top]

One-year Survival, The Percentage of Patients Who Are Alive One Year After Completing Protocol Treatment

(NCT00695292)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Irinotecan, Carboplatin, Sunitinib54

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR), the Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment

Objective benefit is defined as substantial (30% or greater) shrinkage in tumor volume per RECIST 1.0. (NCT00695292)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Irinotecan, Carboplatin, Sunitinib59

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time To Progression (TTP) was defined as the interval between the start date of treatment and the date of occurrence of progressive disease (NCT00695292)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan, Carboplatin, Sunitinib7.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Median number of days from the start of treatment that study participants remained alive. (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 900 days

InterventionDays (Median)
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD018291
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo482

[back to top]

Overall Response (OR)

Number of participants who experienced a best response of Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST 1.1), PR is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. SD is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter. (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD0187
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo10

[back to top]

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D FACTG: FACT-G Total Score (PWB+SWB+EWB+FWB)

"The FACIT-D FACTG: FACT-G Total Score is a total of PWB (Physical Well-Being)+SWB (Social Well-Being)+EWB (Emotional Well-Being)+FWB (Functional Well-Being) subset scores. Individual responses are scale and range from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very Much. The total score ranges from 0-108. Higher scores indicate greater well-being." (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 0Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10
Arm A - Irinotecan+ KD01888.7280.0582.4789.5784.8788.8585.1987.5587.0691.5091.28
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo80.1979.9884.9983.7086.3385.4279.0776.4374.7987.0088.80

[back to top]

Circulating Tumor DNA - Percentage of Patients With DNA Mutations

Percentage of patients with Braf, Kras, Nras, PIK3CA and PTEN mutations associated with tumor detected in the circulating DNA of plasma, before treatment. (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: End of treatment - up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Braf mutationKras mutationNras mutationPIK3CA mutationPTEN mutation
Arm A - Irinotecan+ KD018033112211
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo224411011

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Grade 2-4 Toxicities

The proportion of participants with a toxicity grade greater than or equal to grade 2, per NCI CTCAE 4.0. Toxicity is defined as any adverse event (AE) at least probably related to treatment occurring with 90 days of the beginning of treatment. The worst grade of AE at least probably related to treatment was determined for each participant. (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months after start of study treatment

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD0180.63
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo0.40

[back to top]

Uridine Diphosphate Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 Alleles

The number of patients with specific polymorphisms of UGT1A1 using genotype analysis of peripheral blood sample. UGT1A1*1 is the wild-type allele associated with normal enzyme activity. Patients with genotypic status of 7/7 are at an increased risk of neutropenia following intravenous irinotecan therapy. (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: From 30 minutes prior to irinotecan infusion through to Immediately after irinotecan infusion, up to 8 weeks

,
Interventionnumber of participants (Number)
genotype 5/6genotype 6/6genotype 6/7genotype 7/7
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD0180450
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo1440

[back to top]

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-Fatigue FS: Fatigue Score

"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-Fatigue FS: Fatigue Score is a 13 -item self-reporting assessment that measures fatigue related to their illness. Individual responses are scale and range from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very Much. The total score ranges from 0-52. Higher scores indicate better functioning." (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 0Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD01841.3936.0938.8041.6740.2240.2541.5341.3340.7840.2541.50
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo36.1736.6738.4536.2238.5639.7530.7233.3330.2033.3340.00

[back to top]

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D TOI: Trial Outcome Index

"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D TOI: Trial Outcome Index. is the sum of the Physical Well-Being (PWB), Functional Well-Being (FWB), and additional concerns subscales of the FACIT-D. The TOI is an efficient summary index of physical/functional outcomes. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System is a collection of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires targeted to the management of chronic illness. Individual responses are scale and range from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very Much. The total score can range from 0-100. Higher scores relate to better functioning." (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 0Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10
Arm A - Irinotecan+ KD01882.0378.0176.5681.8877.1280.4079.1182.0081.2580.4468.50
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo79.2375.1782.4276.2779.1173.6266.4665.4061.5075.5076.50

[back to top]

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D SWB: Social Well-Being

"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D Social Well-Being (SWB) is a 7-item subset score of the total FACIT-D self-assessment that measures a patient's social well-being. Individual responses are scale and range from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very Much. The total score ranges from 0-28. Higher scores related to better social well-being." (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 0Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD01825.8521.4620.7425.0923.4325.0722.1925.8324.2225.6724.94
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo23.9124.3325.6025.3324.6024.2923.6022.8921.6323.0023.50

[back to top]

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D FWB: Functional Well-Being

"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D Functional Well-Being (FWB) is a 7-item subscale of the FACIT-D that measures a patient's functional well-being. Individual responses are scale and range from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very Much. The total score ranges from 0-28. Higher scores related to better family well-being." (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 0Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD01819.8518.8919.7820.1119.4419.7719.6219.0019.8322.5821.00
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo18.0717.2120.2019.3219.0920.5017.0016.4017.0020.5021.50

[back to top]

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D EWB: Emotional Well-Being

"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D Emotional Well-Being (EWB) is a 6-item subscale score of the total FACIT-D self-assessment that measures a patient's emotional well-being. Individual responses are scale and range from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very Much. The total score ranges from 0-24. Higher scores related to better emotional well-being." (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 0Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD01819.8518.0019.9620.1119.3320.3819.8820.5720.3321.2522.00
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo16.4316.4317.3017.7619.5518.7517.2017.8015.5021.0020.30

[back to top]

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D - PWB: Physical Well-Being

"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy FACIT-D - PWB: Physical Well-Being is a 7-item subscale score of the total FACIT-D self-assessment that measures a patient's physical well-being. Individual responses are scale and range from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very Much. The total score ranges from 0-28. Higher scores related to better physical well-being." (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 0Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD01823.1821.6922.0024.2622.6723.6223.5022.1422.6722.0023.33
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo21.7922.0022.2121.3023.0921.8820.0020.8317.4022.5023.50

[back to top]

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (Diarrhea) FACIT-D Total Score

"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System is a collection of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires targeted to the management of chronic illness. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (Diarrhea), the FACIT-D, contains 11 items which address concerns related to treatment-related diarrhea. Responses are on a Likert scale and range from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very Much. Thus, total scores can range from 0 to 44. Higher scores relate to better functioning." (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 0Cycle 1Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD01840.0937.6634.7837.7535.6237.0936.5438.6038.5035.6730.00
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo39.7735.5537.7835.6535.7131.2530.3829.3328.2032.5031.50

[back to top]

Metabolites and Cytokine Scoring for Prediction of Time to Disease Progression

Number of patients with metabolites in their blood samples with a score less than 4.8 and greater than 4.8. A Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Analysis was fitted using survival time, status to the cytokines and metabolites as covariates. The analysis computes beta coefficients (hazard ratios) for each cytokine/metabolite. Scores higher than a threshold value of 4.8 were associated with higher overall survival than patients who scored less than 4.8. (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Scores < 4.8 (two metabolites)Scores > 4.8 (two metabolites)Scores < 4.8 (one metabolite+two cytokine)Scores > 4.8 (one metabolite+two cytokine)
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD0183526
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo3645

[back to top]

Clinical Response (CR)

Number of patients that experienced Progressed Disease, Stable Disease or Partial Response per RECIST 1.1. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression). Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters, and Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Progressed DiseaseStable DiseasePartial Response
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD018752
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo291

[back to top]

Circulating Tumor DNA - Percentage of Patients With DNA Mutations

Percentage of patients with Braf, Kras, Nras, PIK3CA and PTEN mutations associated with tumor detected in the circulating DNA of plasma, before treatment. (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Baseline - prior to treatment

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Braf mutationKras mutationNras mutationPIK3CA mutationPTEN mutation
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD0182266112211
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo224405511

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"Median number of days and after the treatment participants remained alive without worsening disease.~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression)." (NCT00730158)
Timeframe: Up to 450 days

InterventionDays (Median)
Arm A - Irinotecan + KD018122
Arm B - Irinotecan + Placebo104

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade ≥ 4 Hematologic and ≥ Grade 3 Non-hematologic Toxicities

Incidence of grade ≥ 4 hematologic and ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities (NCT00735436)
Timeframe: 47 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade >= 4 Hematologic ToxicityGrade >= 3 Non-hematologic Toxicity
Gliadel/Avastin/CPT-1102

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of first progression according to modified Macdonald criteria, or to death due to any cause. Patients alive who had not progressed as of the last follow-up had PFS censored at the last follow-up date. Median PFS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00735436)
Timeframe: Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of first progression according to modified Macdonald criteria or to death due to any cause, assessed up to 47 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Gliadel/Avastin/CPT-118

[back to top]

24-week Overall Survival

The percentage of participants surviving 24 weeks from the start of study treatment (NCT00735436)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Gliadel/Avastin/CPT-1177.8

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Patients alive at last follow-up are censored as of that follow-up date. Median OS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00735436)
Timeframe: Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 47 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Gliadel/Avastin/CPT-1113.5

[back to top]

Incidence and Severity of Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemorrhage

Incidence and severity of CNS hemorrhage (NCT00735436)
Timeframe: 47 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 5 CNS HemorrhageGrade 4 CNS Hemorrhage
Gliadel/Avastin/CPT-1110

[back to top]

24-week Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The percentage of participants surviving 24 weeks from the start of study treatment without progression of disease. PFS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of the first documented progression according to modified Macdonald criteria, or to death due to any cause. (NCT00735436)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Gliadel/Avastin/CPT-1161.1

[back to top]

Overall Response Will be Characterized by the Patient's FDG-PET Scan

A good early FDG Response is a reduction in FDG uptake on the week 3 PET scan of > or = to 35% from baseline. An FDG PET non-responder will be defined as having a decrease of < 35% on the week 3 PET scan compared with baseline. (NCT00737438)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Metabolic ResponderNon-Metabolic Responder
All Patients119

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined, using RECIST version 1.0, as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD or death from any cause. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. For participants without documented PD or death, PFS was censored at the time of last tumor assessment. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-611.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI18.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete or Major Histopathological Response

At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, as described previously. The collective percentage of participants assessed as having a complete or major response was calculated as [number of participants with complete or major response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-657.1
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI52.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version 1.0

Using RECIST version 1.0, participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. The collective percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of CR or PR was calculated as [number of participants meeting RECIST criteria for CR or PR divided by the number of participants analyzed] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-661.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI80.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

(NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-648.7
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI19.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Relapse Following Curative Resection

Among participants with curative resection (complete resection [R0] or microscopic residual tumor [R1]), relapse was defined as the first new occurrence of cancer or death. The percentage of participants who experienced relapse was calculated as [number of participants with a relapse event divided by the number of participants initially classified as R0 or R1 following resective surgery] multiplied by 100. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-676.9
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI57.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. For participants without an event of death, OS was censored at the last-known alive date. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-632.2
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRINA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Resection or Residual (Microscopic or Macroscopic) Tumor

Following resective surgery, participants were evaluated for complete resection (R0) or the presence of microscopic (R1) or macroscopic (R2) residual tumor. The percentage of participants within each residual tumor classification was calculated as [number of participants with R0, R1, and/or R2 divided by the total number of participants] multiplied by 100. Associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for one-sample binomial using the Clopper-Pearson method. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
R0, R1, or R2R0 or R1R0
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI61.051.248.8
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-648.733.323.1

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response according to RECIST version 1.0 was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented CR or PR. Participants were considered to have achieved CR upon the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Participants who achieved PR demonstrated at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the largest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the Screening sum largest diameter. Responses were confirmed by repeat assessments no less than 4 weeks after criteria for response were first met. For participants who did not complete a confirmatory tumor assessment, time to response was censored at the date of last tumor assessment, or if unavailable, at the date of first dose. Time to response was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-63.1
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI3.1

[back to top]

Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)

RFS was defined as the time from curative resection (complete resection [R0] or microscopic residual tumor [R1]) to the date of first diagnosis of relapse. For participants with curative resection and without relapse, RFS was censored at the last known relapse-free assessment. RFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at time of surgery; 48 hours and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; within 4 weeks after completion of treatment; every 3 to 6 months for 1 year; then annually)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-68.1
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI17.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Death or Disease Progression

PD was defined, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or the appearance of one or more new lesions. The percentage of participants experiencing PD or death was calculated as [number of participants with event divided by the number of participants analyzed] multiplied by 100. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; 4 and 12 weeks after surgery; and at the end of Cycles 4 and 8 if assessed as R0 or R1, or every 6 weeks until progression or resectability if assessed as R2)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-689.7
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI68.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Histopathological Response

At the time of resective surgery, participants were evaluated for histopathological response as defined through pathologist review of the resected metastatic lesions, including assessment of margin status and tumor cell viability. Histopathological response classification was based upon the percentage of viable tumor cells, where 'Complete response' was considered for those with 0 percent (%) viable tumor cells, 'Major response' for those with 1% to 49% viable tumor cells, 'Minor response' for 50% to 99% viable tumor cells, and 'No response' for 100% viable tumor cells. The response could not be determined in some cases and was documented as 'Unknown.' The percentage of participants within each response category was calculated as [number of participants with a given response divided by the number of participants who completed the assessment] multiplied by 100. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; every 6 weeks, and within 4 weeks prior to surgery; and at time of/after surgery)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete responseMajor responseMinor responseNo responseUnknown
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI4.847.633.3014.3
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-6057.128.6014.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Resection

Time to resection was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first resective surgery. For participants who did not undergo resective surgery, time to resection was censored at Day 1. Time to resection was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00778102)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years (at Screening; prior to each cycle, and within 7 days prior to surgery; and at time of surgery)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX-64.4
Bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI4.3

[back to top]

Response Rate (RR)

Response rate (RR) = the # participants with partial response (PR) + # participants with (CR) / # participants with (PR) + # participants with (CR ) + # participants with (SD) + # participants with (PD). This proportion was subsequently multiplied by 100. RECIST v1.0 criteria for Target Lesions was used: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started (NCT00836277)
Timeframe: Up to 14 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Irinotecan + Panitumumab6

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

Using RECIST v1.0 criteria, clinical benefit rate (CBR) = # participants with (PR) + # participants with (CR) + # participants with (SD) / # participants with (PR) + # participants with (CR) + # participants with (SD) + # participants with (PD). This proportion was subsequently multiplied by 100. RECIST v1.0 criteria for Target Lesions is defined as: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started. (NCT00836277)
Timeframe: Up to 14 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Irinotecan + Panitumumab50

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

(NCT00836277)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months (cohort)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan + Panitumumab7.2

[back to top]

1-year (Overall) Survival Rate

(NCT00836277)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Irinotecan + Panitumumab11.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Survival time the is free of disease progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00836277)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months (cohort)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan + Panitumumab2.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and Other (Non-Serious) Adverse Events According to the CTCAE v.3.0

(NCT00838578)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, death, or withdrawal post initial KRN330 treatment, assessed up to 100 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Regimen A: KRN330 Biweekly + Irinotecan Biweekly12
Regimen B: KRN330 Weekly + Irinotecan Biweekly7
PH 2 Treatment: KRN330 Wkly + IRI Biwkly44

[back to top]

The Number of Participants Who Died During 30-Day Follow-Up

Reported are the deaths during the 30-day follow-up period regardless of causality. (NCT00845039)
Timeframe: 26.3 months post-randomization up to 30-day post-treatment follow-up

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cetuximab + Irinotecan1
Cetuximab + IMC-A12 + Irinotecan1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With One-year Recurrence-free Survival

This is defined as the patients who did not have recurrence of cancer at 1 year since the start of induction chemotherapy. (NCT00848783)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
A-with IP Floxuridine3
B-Without IP Floxuridine2

[back to top]

DoR by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population

Progressive Disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study); in addition to a relative increase of 20%, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. CR is defined as disappearance of all target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters (NCT00856375)
Timeframe: From the time measurement criteria for CR/PR (whichever was first recorded) were first met until the first date that recurrent disease or PD or death was objectively documented, assessed until the end of study approximately 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
NKTR-1027.9
Irinotecan1.4

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of OS: ITT Population

Duration of OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Patients were followed until their date of death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or final database closure. Patients who were lost-to-follow-up or were not known to have died were censored at last date they were shown to be alive. Patients who did not have any follow-up since the date of randomization were censored at the date of randomization. (NCT00856375)
Timeframe: From randomization to death, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent for further follow-up for survival, or end of study, approximately 42 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
NKTR-1029.6
Irinotecan8.4

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of PFS by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of disease progression (assessed by central radiological review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1) or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. PFS was determined using the intention-to-treat (ITT) population which included all randomized patients who underwent baseline evaluation, with treatment assigned according to randomized arm. For patients whose disease did not progress or who did not die, the PFS time was censored at the time of the last tumor assessment that demonstrated lack of disease progression. For patients who received new anti-cancer therapy, the PFS time was censored at the time of last tumor assessment prior to the new anti-cancer therapy starts. (NCT00856375)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks (± 5 days) from Cycle 1, Day 1 until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study, approximately 42 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
NKTR-1024.0
Irinotecan2.8

[back to top]

ORR by Central Radiological Review: ITT Population

ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 based upon the best response as assessed by central radiological review; confirmation of response was not required. The analyses were performed for patients in the ITT population who had measurable disease as determined by the central imaging facility at baseline. (NCT00856375)
Timeframe: From randomization of the first subject until documented disease progression, start of new therapy for cancer, death, or end of study approximately 42 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Median)
NKTR-1029.8
Irinotecan5.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants (≥2%) With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events NCI-CTCAE Grade 3 or Higher

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient administered a pharmaceutical product which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE could have been any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing events, which increased in frequency or severity or changed in nature during or as a consequence of use of the study medication were also considered as AEs. All AEs were assessed for severity using the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 3.0. If a particular AE was not listed in the NCI CTCAE Version 3.0, the following criteria were used: Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life threatening or disabling; Grade 5 = death. (NCT00856375)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study medication through the End-of-Treatment visit (30 ± 3 days from last dose of study drug), assessed until the end of study approximately 42 months

,
Intervention% of participants (Number)
Percentage of participants with ≥1 TEAEPercentage of participants with DiarrheaPercentage of participants with NeutropeniaPercentage of participants with Abdominal PainPercentage of participants with DehydrationPercentage of participants with VomitingPercentage of participants with NauseaPercentage of participants with HypokalemiaPercentage of participants with FatiguePercentage of participants with Intestinal ObstructionPercentage of participants with LeukopeniaPercentage of participants with Febrile NeutropeniaPercentage of participants with AlopeciaPercentage of participants with Disease ProgressionPercentage of participants with HyponatremiaPercentage of participants with Acute Prerenal FailurePercentage of participants with AstheniaPercentage of participants with HyperbilirubinemiaPercentage of participants with Performance Status DecreasedPercentage of participants with Sepsis
Irinotecan63.919.514.64.99.87.32.47.32.49.84.97.34.92.44.92.42.42.404.9
NKTR-10261.921.47.114.39.511.914.37.19.52.47.12.42.44.82.42.42.42.44.80

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 2000), progression is defined as 20% or greater increase from the baseline tumor parameters or new lesions. (NCT00856830)
Timeframe: 7 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Novel Drug Combination6.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicity Regimen A - Phase I

The determination of the dose limiting toxicity as defined by The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 3 as follows: grade 4 neutropenia >5 days; grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia; grade 4 thrombocytopenia; or grade >2 non-hematologic toxicities (except for nausea/vomiting, alopecia, or fatigue). (NCT00856830)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I - Cohort IPhase I - Cohort IIPhase I - Cohort III
Novel Drug Combination011

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events - Phase II

The degree of toxicity as defined by The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 3. (NCT00856830)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Novel Drug Combination8

[back to top]

Rate of Potentially Curative Surgery

This is defined as the percentage of patients who underwent curative surgery (surgery to remove all cancerous tissue). (NCT00857246)
Timeframe: 4 months from the beginning of the induction treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Induction/ Surgery/ chemoRT78

[back to top]

Safety of the Induction Regimen

This describes the number of patients who experienced grade 3 and higher adverse events related to the regimen. (NCT00857246)
Timeframe: 4 months from the beginning of the induction

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Neutrophils/granulocytesDiarrheaFatigueRashLeukocytesHypomagnesmiaHypotensionLymphopeniaVomitingDehydrationHypophosphatemiaHypokelemiaStomatitis/PharyngitisFebrile neutropeniaHemoglobinCarpopedal syndrome
Induction Treatment13433222111111111

[back to top]

Clinical Response Rate of an Induction Regimen Consisting of Irinotecan, Cisplatin and Cetuximab

"Clinical response rate is defined as the percentage of patients who responded to the induction regimen. The response is determined based on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) staging pre-treatment and post-treatment, CT scans pre- and post- operatively, and initial clinical stage (based on these tests) compared with the pathologic stage. Any down-staging of T or N stage is considered to be a result of induction therapy and counted as a clinical response." (NCT00857246)
Timeframe: 4 months from the beginning of the induction regimen

Interventionpercentage of paticipants (Number)
Induction/ Surgery/ chemoRT40

[back to top]

"Rate of Down-staging From Pre-operative Clinical Staging"

This is defined as the percentage of patients who had a reduction from T3/T4 disease. (NCT00857246)
Timeframe: 4 months from the beginning of the induction treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Induction/ Surgery/ chemoRT53

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (Adjuvant Therpary)

This is the length of time from the start of treatment that half of the patients are still alive. (NCT00857246)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Induction/ Surgery/ chemoRT39.5

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (Induction Treatment and Curative Surgery)

This is the length of time from the start of treatment that half of the patients are still alive. (NCT00857246)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Induction/ Surgery/ chemoRT35.3

[back to top]

Rate of Clearance of Nodal Involvement Among Patients Who Have Received the Induction Therapy

This is defined as the percentage of patients whose nodal involvement of cancer has been cleared based on surgery results. (NCT00857246)
Timeframe: 4 months from the beginning of the induction treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Induction/ Surgery/ chemoRT0

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.1). Target lesions are assessed by computerized tomography (CT): Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions to qualify for Progressive Disease; Progressive Disease (PD), 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. ORR is the percentage of patients who experienced a CR + the percentage of patients who experienced a PR. (NCT00871169)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, and Cetuximab6.9

[back to top]

Toxicity

Toxicity will be evaluated per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. Frequency and severity of adverse events will be tabulated using counts of frequently occurring, serious and severe events of interest (i.e. Grade 3 and Grade 4 adverse events, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)). (NCT00871169)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 3 Alkaline Phosphatase IncreasedGrade 3 Allergic Reaction/HypersensitivityGrade 3 AnorexiaGrade 3 AscitesGrade 3 Aspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedGrade 3 ConstipationGrade 3 Creatinine IncreasedGrade 3 Hemoglobin DecreasedGrade 3 DehydrationGrade 3 DiarrheaGrade 3 Limb EdemaGrade 3 FatigueGrade 3 Gamma-glutamyltransferase IncreasedGrade 3 HyperbilirubinemiaGrade 3 HyperglycemiaGrade 3 HypoalbuminemiaGrade 3 HypokalemiaGrade 3 HyponatremiaGrade 3 HypophosphatemiaGrade 3 InsomniaGrade 3 LeukopeniaGrade 3 NauseaGrade 3 NeutropeniaGrade 3 Pain - AbdomenGrade 3 Pain - BoneGrade 3 Decreased RespirationGrade 3 RashGrade 3 SyncopeGrade 3 ThrombocytopeniaGrade 3 VomitingGrade 4 EncephalopathyGrade 4 FatigueGrade 4 Gamma-glutamyltransferase IncreasedGrade 4 HyperglycemiaGrade 4 HypokalemiaGrade 4 HypothermiaGrade 4 Pleural EffusionSAE: Grade 3 AcidosisSAE: Grade 3 AnorexiaSAE: Grade 3 AscitesSAE: Grade 3 BacteremiaSAE: Grade 3 CholangitisSAE: Grade 3 DehydrationSAE: Grade 3 DiarrheaSAE: Grade 3 FatigueSAE: Grade 3 Gastrointestinal HemorrhageSAE: Grade 4 HyperbilirubinemaiSAE: Grade 4 HyperglycemiaSAE: Grade 3 HypotensionSAE: Grade 2 Bowel ObstructionSAE: Grade 3 Bowel ObstructionSAE: Grade 3 GholangitisSAE: Grade 2 Urinary Tract InfectionSAE: Grade 3 Infection of unknown originSAE: Grade 5 Intracranial HemorrhageSAE: Grade 2 Mental Status ChangeSAE: Grade 4 Muscle WeaknessSAE: Grade 3 NauseaSAE: Grade 2 Abdominal PainSAE: Grade 3 Abdominal PainSAE: Grade 2 Pulmonary embolusSAE: Grade 4 Pulmonary EmbolusSAE: Grade 4 Renal FailureSAE: Grade 4 SeizureSAE: Grade 2 Sinus tachycardiaSAE: Grade 4 ThrombosisSAE: Grade 3 VomitingSAE: Grade 3 Weight Loss
Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, and Cetuximab412213121118236111131133511312211111111111171121111211111111412111131

[back to top]

To Provide Safety and Efficacy Data for to Recommend Further Larger Studies.

Number participants with grade 3 and 4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. All toxicities are for end of cycle 2. (NCT00876993)
Timeframe: Two 28 day cycles

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3 & 4 Blood/Bone MarrowGrade 3 & 4 GastrointestinalGrade 3 & 4 Metabolic/LaboratoryGrade 3 & 4 Musculoskelatal/Soft TissueGrade 3 & 4 NeurologyGrade 3 & 4 PainGrade 3 & 4 VascularGrade 3 & 4 Other
Cohort 1 - Dose Level 120001101
Cohort 2 - Dose Level 000000010
Cohort 3 - Dose Level 101000000
Cohort 4 - Dose Level 211113200
Cohort 5 - Dose Level 110000000

[back to top]

Measurement of Number of Adverse Events

Collect and grade the all of the adverse events to evaluate for safety. This data was collected for the first 2 cycles for each participant. (NCT00876993)
Timeframe: Two 28-day cycles

,,,,
InterventionAdverse events (Number)
Grade 1 adverse eventsGrade 2 adverse eventsGrade 3 adverse eventsGrade 4 adverse events
Cohort 1 - Dose Level 14431
Cohort 2 - Dose Level 06310
Cohort 3 - Dose Level 13310
Cohort 4 - Dose Level 25540
Cohort 5 - Dose Level 13210

[back to top]

2 Year Event Free Survival With Children Treated With This Regimen.

2 year actual event free survival.with children treated with this protocol (NCT00876993)
Timeframe: 2 year

InterventionCount of participants (Number)
Cohort 1 - Dose Level 14
Cohort 2 - Dose Level 06
Cohort 3 - Dose Level 13
Cohort 4 - Dose Level 25
Cohort 5 - Dose Level 13

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to Ganitumab

Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-ganitumab antibodies. First, an eletrochemiluminescent bridging immunoassay was used to detect binding antibodies (screening assay) and confirm antibodies (confirmatory assay) capable of binding ganitumab. Second, a cell-based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against ganitumab. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From first dose of ganitumab until 30 days after last dose; median time frame was 2.4 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Binding antibody positiveNeutralizing antibody positive
Part 2: Panitumumab + Ganitumab00

[back to top]

Time to Objective Response

Time to objective response was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to the first confirmed objective response. An objective response is defined as a confirmed complete response or partial response per modified RECIST v1.0 criteria during the treatment period. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug until the end of treatment in each Part; median duration of treatment was 16 weeks in Part 1 and 8 weeks in Part 2.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: Panitumumab + Irinotecan1.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the interval from the first dose of study therapy to the earlier date of disease progression (per modified RECIST version 1.0) or death prior to the analysis data cutoff date, initiating a new line of anti-tumor therapy, and receiving study treatment in Part 2 where applicable. Participants who had not progressed or died during this period were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target or non-target lesions, significant increase in pleural effusions, ascites, or other fluid collections with cytologic proof of malignancy, or any new lesions. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date of 30 July 2013. Median time on study follow-up was 48.5 weeks for Part 1 and 32 weeks in Part 2.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: Panitumumab + Irinotecan4.6
Part 2: Panitumumab + Ganitumab1.7

[back to top]

Part 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) measured by the investigator per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0 criteria during the treatment period. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in size of target lesions and no progression (increase in size) of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions, persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease (PD) and no new lesions. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug in Part 2 until the end of treatment in Part 2; median duration of treatment in Part 2 was 8 weeks.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 2: Panitumumab + Ganitumab0.00

[back to top]

Part 1: Objective Response Rate

"Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) measured by the investigator per modified RECIST version 1.0 criteria during the treatment period.~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in size of target lesions and no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions, persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) not qualifying for either CR or progressive disease and no new lesions." (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment in Part 1; median duration of treatment was 16 weeks.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1: Panitumumab + Irinotecan21.62

[back to top]

Part 1: Emergence of Mutant KRAS

Mutation in Kirsten rat sarcoma-2 virus oncogene (KRAS) status was determined by examining KRAS exons 2, 3, and 4. The emergence of mutant KRAS was defined as a change in KRAS mutation status from wild-type at Baseline in KRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 to mutant in any of KRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 at the time of the second biopsy following the radiographic evidence of acquired resistance to panitumumab when given in combination with irinotecan. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug until the 2nd biopsy at the time of disease progression/entry into Part 2; median duration of treatment in Part 1 was 16 weeks.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1: Panitumumab + Irinotecan8.00

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from the first dose of study therapy in Part 1 or Part 2 to the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cutoff date were censored at their last contact date. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date of 30 July 2013. Median time on study follow-up was 48.5 weeks for Part 1 and 32 weeks in Part 2.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: Panitumumab + Irinotecan11.6
Part 2: Panitumumab + Ganitumab7.6

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from the first confirmed objective response to the earlier date of disease progression or death. An objective response is defined as a confirmed complete response or partial response per modified RECIST v1.0 criteria during the treatment period. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug until the data cut-off date of 30 July 2013. Median time on study follow-up was 48.5 weeks for Part 1 and 32 weeks in Part 2.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: Panitumumab + Irinotecan7.7

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Worst Post-baseline Grade 3 or Higher Laboratory Toxicities

The severity of laboratory toxicities was graded using CTCAE v3.0. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From first dose date to 30 days since the last dose date in each part of the study. The median time frame is 4.2 months for Part 1 and 2.4 months for Part 2.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decreased absolute neutrophil countDecreased hemoglobinDecreased lymphocytesDecreased total neutrophilsDecreased white blood cellsDecreased albuminIncreased alkaline phosphataseIncreased aspartate aminotransferaseDecreased calciumIncreased creatinineDecreased glucoseIncreased glucoseDecreased magnesiumIncreased magnesiumDecreased phosphorusDecreased potassiumIncreased potassiumDecreased sodiumIncreased total bilirubin
Part 1: Panitumumab + Irinotecan3332215141219227373
Part 2: Panitumumab + Ganitumab0000002110022210000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

The severity of each adverse event (AE) was graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (where 1 = Mild [aware of sign or symptom, but easily tolerated]; 2 = Moderate [discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity]; 3 = severe [incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity]; 4 = life-threatening; 5 = fatal), with the exception of selected skin toxicities that were graded using a modified version of CTC. Treatment-related adverse events were those events for which the investigator considered there to be a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by panitumumab (Part 1) and by panitumumab and/or ganitumab (Part 2). Discontinuation includes AEs leading to discontinuation of panitumumab (Part 1) and panitumumab, ganitumab (Part 2) or removal from the study. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From first dose date to 30 days since the last dose date in each part of the study. The median time frame is 4.2 months for Part 1 and 2.4 months for Part 2.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse event (AE)Worst grade of 3Worst grade of 4Worst grade of 5Worst grade of 5 excluding progressive diseaseSerious adverse event (SAE)Non-serious AE leading to discontinuationSAE leading to discontinuationAny treatment-related adverse event (TRAE)TRAE worst grade of 3TRAE worst grade of 4TRAE worst grade of 5TRAE worst grade 5 excluding progressive diseaseTreatment-related SAENon-serious TRAE leading to discontinuationSerious TRAE leading to discontinuation
Part 1: Panitumumab + Irinotecan744366126387034300701
Part 2: Panitumumab + Ganitumab3517120811337100110

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to Panitumumab

Two screening immunoassays, an acid-dissociation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a Biacore-based biosensor assay, were used to detect antibodies capable of binding to panitumumab. Postive samples were further tested for neutralizing antibodies in a cell-based epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) phosphorylation bioassay. (NCT00891930)
Timeframe: From first dose date to 30 days since the last dose date. The median time frame is 4.2 months for Part 1 and 2.4 months for Part 2.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Binding antibody positiveNeutralizing antibody positive
Panitumumab00

[back to top]

Best Response

Best response on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria: Complete Response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Both require confirmation no fewer than 4 weeks apart. CR/PR assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Stable disease is defined as any condition not meeting above criteria. (NCT00911820)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Treatment duration was a median of 5 cycles (up to approximately 1 year) in this study cohort as of this analysis..

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseRemoved Before Restaging
Arm A: PCA3221513
Arm B: TPCA0211406

[back to top]

7-month Progression-Free Survival

7-month progression-free survival is the probability of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 7-months from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. (NCT00911820)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 7 months of follow-up.

Interventionprobability (Number)
Arm A: PCA0.581
Arm B: TPCA0.582

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Patients alive and progression-free at last follow-up are censored. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. (NCT00911820)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Patients were followed for up to 2.5 years as of this analysis.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: PCA7.9
Arm B: TPCA8.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive and estimate using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. (NCT00911820)
Timeframe: Patients in the study cohort were followed up to approximately 2.5 years as of this analysis.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: PCA11.7
Arm B: TPCA13.4

[back to top]

Overall Response (OR) Rate

Overall response (OR) rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. (NCT00911820)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Treatment duration was a median of 5 cycles (up to approximately 1 year) in this study cohort as of this analysis.

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Arm A: PCA.568
Arm B: TPCA.512

[back to top]

CL of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Irinotecan was administered with an intravenous infusion of 150 mg/m^2 once every other week on Days 1, 15, and 29. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Cetuximab was administered on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36. The CL of plasma Irinotecan was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 1, 5, 8, 24, and 48 h after completion of Irinotecan infusion

InterventionL/h/m^2 (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone12.3
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg13.1

[back to top]

Vss of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Irinotecan was administered with an intravenous infusion of 150 mg/m^2 once every other week on Days 1, 15, and 29. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Cetuximab was administered on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36. The Vss of plasma Irinotecan was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 1, 5, 8, 24, and 48 h after completion of Irinotecan infusion

InterventionL/m^2 (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone117
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg137

[back to top]

Steady-state Volume of Distribution (Vss) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan

In Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab was administered on Days 1 and 22 as an intravenous infusion at 10 mg/kg. In the same Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered on Days 8, 15, 22 and 29; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 8 and 22. The Vss of plasma Dalotuzumab alone was determined on Day 1, and in combination with cetuximab/irinotecan on Day 22. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 and Day 22 at predose, 0.5 h after start of infusion, end of infusion, 5, 8, 24, 30, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of dalotuzumab infusion

InterventionL/kg (Geometric Mean)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Alone0.0558
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab/Irinotecan0.0459

[back to top]

Vss of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered with an initial intravenous infusion of 400 mg/m^2 on Day 8, followed by subsequent once weekly intravenous infusions of 250 mg/m^2 on Days 15, 22, 29 and 36. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 1, 22, and 29. The Vss of plasma Cetuximab was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 2, 5, 8, 24, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of cetuximab infusion

InterventionL/m^2 (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone1.45
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg1.32

[back to top]

AUC0-24 of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Irinotecan was administered with an intravenous infusion of 150 mg/m^2 once every other week on Days 1, 15, and 29. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Cetuximab was administered on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36. The AUC0-24 of plasma Irinotecan was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 1, 5, 8 and 24 h after completion of Irinotecan infusion

Interventionµg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone7.19
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg6.64

[back to top]

Tmax of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Irinotecan was administered with an intravenous infusion of 150 mg/m^2 once every other week on Days 1, 15, and 29. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Cetuximab was administered on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36. The Tmax of plasma Irinotecan was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 1, 5, 8, 24, and 48 h after completion of Irinotecan infusion

Interventionh (Median)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone1.0
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg1.0

[back to top]

Tmax of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered with an initial intravenous infusion of 400 mg/m^2 on Day 8, followed by subsequent once weekly intravenous infusions of 250 mg/m^2 on Days 15, 22, 29 and 36. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 1, 22, and 29. The Tmax of plasma Cetuximab was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 2, 5, 8, 24, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of cetuximab infusion

Interventionh (Median)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone7.9
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg2.0

[back to top]

Concentration at the End of Infusion (Ceoi) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan

In Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab was administered on Days 1 and 22 as an intravenous infusion at 10 mg/kg. In the same Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered on Days 8, 15, 22 and 29; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 8 and 22. The Ceoi of plasma Dalotuzumab alone was determined on Day 1, and in combination with cetuximab/irinotecan on Day 22. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 and Day 22 at predose, 0.5 h after start of infusion, end of infusion, 5, 8, 24, 30, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of dalotuzumab infusion

Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Alone211.2
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab/Irinotecan267.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Human Anti-Human Antibody (HAHA)

Sera were collected from participants prior to administration of the first dose of study drug, every 6 weeks during the study period, then 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-treatment. A sandwich format enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the presence of HAHA in serum. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks after the last administration of dalotuzumab (up to 349 days)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cetux/Irin - Dmab 10 mg/kg0
Cetux/Irin - Dmab 15/7.5 mg/kg0
Dmab 10 mg/kg - Cetux/Irin (DDI)0

[back to top]

T1/2 of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered with an initial intravenous infusion of 400 mg/m^2 on Day 8, followed by subsequent once weekly intravenous infusions of 250 mg/m^2 on Days 15, 22, 29 and 36. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 1, 22, and 29. The T1/2 of plasma Cetuximab was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 2, 5, 8, 24, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of cetuximab infusion

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone129.4
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg131.9

[back to top]

T1/2 of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Irinotecan was administered with an intravenous infusion of 150 mg/m^2 once every other week on Days 1, 15, and 29. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Cetuximab was administered on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36. The T1/2 of plasma Irinotecan was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29.. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 1, 5, 8, 24, and 48 h after completion of Irinotecan infusion

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone8.95
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg9.67

[back to top]

Apparent Terminal Half-life (T1/2) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan

In Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab was administered on Days 1 and 22 as an intravenous infusion at 10 mg/kg. In the same Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered on Days 8, 15, 22 and 29; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 8 and 22. The T1/2 of plasma Dalotuzumab alone was determined on Day 1, and in combination with cetuximab/irinotecan on Day 22. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 and Day 22 at predose, 0.5 h after start of infusion, end of infusion, 5, 8, 24, 30, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of dalotuzumab infusion

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Alone131.4
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab/Irinotecan141.4

[back to top]

Clearance From Plasma (CL) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan

In Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab was administered on Days 1 and 22 as an intravenous infusion at 10 mg/kg. In the same Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered on Days 8, 15, 22 and 29; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 8 and 22. The CL of plasma Dalotuzumab alone was determined on Day 1, and in combination with cetuximab/irinotecan on Day 22. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 and Day 22 at predose, 0.5 h after start of infusion, end of infusion, 5, 8, 24, 30, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of dalotuzumab infusion

InterventionmL/min/kg (Geometric Mean)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Alone0.0049
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab/Irinotecan0.0038

[back to top]

CL of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered with an initial intravenous infusion of 400 mg/m^2 on Day 8, followed by subsequent once weekly intravenous infusions of 250 mg/m^2 on Days 15, 22, 29 and 36. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 1, 22, and 29. The CL of plasma Cetuximab was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 2, 5, 8, 24, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of cetuximab infusion

InterventionmL/h/m^2 (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone7.81
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg6.82

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone in or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan

In Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab was administered on Days 1 and 22 as an intravenous infusion at 10 mg/kg. In the same Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered on Days 8, 15, 22 and 29; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 8 and 22. The Tmax of plasma Dalotuzumab alone was determined on Day 1, and in combination with cetuximab/irinotecan on Day 22. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 and Day 22 at predose, 0.5 h after start of infusion, end of infusion, 5, 8, 24, 30, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of dalotuzumab infusion

Interventionh (Median)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Alone5.0
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab/Irinotecan3.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the SPONSOR's product, is also an AE. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Approximately 4 weeks after last drug treatment (up to Day 293)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cetux/Irin - Dmab 10 mg/kg8
Cetux/Irin - Dmab 15/7.5 mg/kg6
Dmab 10 mg/kg - Cetux/Irin (DDI)6

[back to top]

Number of Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

To be declared a DLT an adverse experience had a causality related to study therapy. DLTs could be adverse experiences possibly, probably, or definitely related to study therapy by the Investigator, and included the following : Grade 4 neutropenia lasting >= 5 days; Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia with fever >38.5°C; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia; Grade 3 or Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity, except inadequately treated diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, rash, hyperglycemia, and transient abnormality of electrolytes. Anemia, infusion reactions, hypersensitivity reactions, and adverse experiences not-related to study therapy did not qualify as DLTs. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Four weeks of Cycle 1 treatment (up to 28 days)

InterventionDLT (Number)
Cetux/Irin - Dmab 10 mg/kg0
Cetux/Irin - Dmab 15/7.5 mg/kg1

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0-168 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-168) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan

In Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab was administered on Days 1 and 22 as an intravenous infusion at 10 mg/kg. In the same Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered on Days 8, 15, 22 and 29; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 8 and 22. The AUC0-168 of plasma Dalotuzumab alone was determined on Day 1, and in combination with cetuximab/irinotecan on Day 22. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 and Day 22 at predose, 0.5 h after start of infusion, end of infusion, 5, 8, 24, 30, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of dalotuzumab infusion

Interventionmg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Alone19.6
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab/Irinotecan24.5

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan

In Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab was administered on Days 1 and 22 as an intravenous infusion at 10 mg/kg. In the same Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered on Days 8, 15, 22 and 29; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 8 and 22. The Cmax of plasma Dalotuzumab alone was determined on Day 1, and in combination with cetuximab/irinotecan on Day 22. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 and Day 22 at predose, 0.5 h after start of infusion, end of infusion, 5, 8, 24, 30, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of dalotuzumab infusion

Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Alone247.6
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab/Irinotecan311.9

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From 0-24 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-24) of Dalotuzumab Following Administration of 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab Alone or in Combination With Cetuximab / Irinotecan

In Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab was administered on Days 1 and 22 as an intravenous infusion at 10 mg/kg. In the same Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered on Days 8, 15, 22 and 29; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 8 and 22. The AUC0-24 of plasma Dalotuzumab alone was determined on Day 1, and in combination with cetuximab/irinotecan on Day 22. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 and Day 22 at predose, 0.5 h after start of infusion, end of infusion, 5, 8 and 24 h after initiation of dalotuzumab infusion

Interventionmg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg Alone4.56
Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg + Cetuximab/Irinotecan5.39

[back to top]

Cmax of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered with an initial intravenous infusion of 400 mg/m^2 on Day 8, followed by subsequent once weekly intravenous infusions of 250 mg/m^2 on Days 15, 22, 29 and 36. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 1, 22, and 29. The Cmax of plasma Cetuximab was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 2, 5, 8, 24, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of cetuximab infusion

Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone204.0
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg236.5

[back to top]

AUC0-168 of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered with an initial intravenous infusion of 400 mg/m^2 on Day 8, followed by subsequent once weekly intravenous infusions of 250 mg/m^2 on Days 15, 22, 29 and 36. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 1, 22, and 29. The AUC0-168 of plasma Cetuximab was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 2, 5, 8, 24, 48, 96 and 168 h after initiation of cetuximab infusion

Interventionmg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone18.6
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg20.1

[back to top]

Cmax of Irinotecan Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Irinotecan was administered with an intravenous infusion of 150 mg/m^2 once every other week on Days 1, 15, and 29. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Cetuximab was administered on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36. The Cmax of plasma Irinotecan was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 1, 5, 8, 24, and 48 h after completion of Irinotecan infusion

Interventionµg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone1.21
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg1.13

[back to top]

AUC0-24 of Cetuximab Following Administration of Cetuximab / Irinotecan Alone, or in Combination With 10 mg/kg Dalotuzumab

In Cycle 1 Cetuximab was administered with an initial intravenous infusion of 400 mg/m^2 on Day 8, followed by subsequent once weekly intravenous infusions of 250 mg/m^2 on Days 15, 22, 29 and 36. In the same Cycle 1 Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg was administered on Days 22, 29 and 36; and Irinotecan was administered on Days 1, 22, and 29. The AUC0-24 of plasma Cetuximab was determined alone on Day 15 and in combination with dalotuzumab on Day 29. (NCT00925015)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 15 and Day 29 at predose, 2, 5, 8 and 24 h after initiation of cetuximab infusion

Interventionmg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cetuximab/Irinotecan Alone4.02
Cetuximab/Irinotecan + Dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg4.12

[back to top]

Tumor Response

Tumor response will be determined using Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Response will classified as: Complete response - disappearance of all lesions; Partial response - at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameter or 30% reduction of arterial enhancement; Progressive disease - at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest longest diameter recorded since start of treatment or appearance of one or more new lesions greater than 1cm in size; Stable disease - neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since start of treatment. (NCT00932438)
Timeframe: Months 2, 4 and 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LC Beads Loaded With Irinotecan and FOLFOX631
FOLFOX6 and Bevacizumab16

[back to top]

Number of Serious Adverse Events

Total number of serious adverse events that occurred in both Arms of the study. (NCT00932438)
Timeframe: First treatment through one year post treatment completion

InterventionSerious Adverse Event (Number)
Irinotecan Beads With FOLFOX649
FOLFOX6/Avastin Alone21

[back to top]

Toxicity of the Combination of Study Drugs

"Data on the toxicity of the combination of study drugs is assessed by laboratory blood draws done on day 1 of every treatment cycle and by patient report while on study treatment and up to 30 days after the last treatment. Grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events (AE) where the relationship between the AE and at least one of the study drugs were considered to be definite, probable or possible, were collected using National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria for adverse events version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0). AEs are graded as:~Grade 1 Mild AE Grade 2 Moderate AE Grade 3 Severe AE Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 Death related to AE" (NCT00940316)
Timeframe: Day 1 of every 2 week treatment cycle while on study treatment and 30 days after the last treatment for a maximum of 51 cycles.

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hemoglobin decreaseLeukocyte decreaseLymphopeniaNeutrophil decreaseFatigueDry skinRash/desquamationRash: Hand-foot skin reactionAnorexiaDiarrheaNauseaInfectionAlkaline phosphatase decreaseMagnesium decreasePhosphate decreaseSodium decreaseSyncope/faintingPruritus/itching
Arm A: Erlotinib + Panitumumab + Irinotecan371711041611052110
Arm B Cross Over - Erlotinib + Panitumumab + Irinotecan000000000000000000
Arm B: Erlotinib + Panitumumab100010070000241001
Arm C: Erlotinib + Panitumumab010110120110013000

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Progression free survival will be measured every 8 weeks during treatment by CT or MRI scans. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).~Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions." (NCT00940316)
Timeframe: At baseline and every 8 weeks during treatment until disease progression and for a maximum of 51 cycles where 1 cycle = 2 weeks

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A: Erlotinib + Panitumumab + Irinotecan4.6
Arm B: Erlotinib + Panitumumab3.8
Arm C: Erlotinib + Panitumumab2.4

[back to top]

Tumor Response Rate Based on Complete Response (CR)+ Partial Response (PR) + Stable Disease (SD)

"Tumor response rate will be measured by CT scan of the chest and CT scan or MRI scan of abdomen and pelvis every 8 weeks until disease progression response rate will be measured per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions.~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions.~Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD)of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD.~Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions,taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions.~Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started" (NCT00940316)
Timeframe: At baseline and every 8 weeks during treatment until progressive disease for maximum of 51 cycles where 1 cycle = 2 weeks.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable disease
Arm A: Erlotinib + Panitumumab + Irinotecan046
Arm B: Erlotinib + Panitumumab133
Arm C: Erlotinib + Panitumumab002

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

Median Overall Survival (OS) is measured from treatment initiation until death due to any cause. (NCT00940316)
Timeframe: From the time of first treatment to death

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A: Erlotinib + Panitumumab + Irinotecan12.6
Arm B: Erlotinib + Panitumumab8.6
Arm C: Erlotinib + Panitumumab2.4

[back to top]

Median Blood Loss During Surgery

Blood loss during surgery is related to complexity of the operation and via that to the stage of disease (more tumor to be cytoreduced, more blood loss). (NCT00941655)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionml (Median)
Surgery + HIPEC + Systemic Chemotherapy650

[back to top]

Median Hospital Stay After Initial Surgery

Recuperation period following complex surgery for this disease. (NCT00941655)
Timeframe: 1-10 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Surgery + HIPEC + Systemic Chemotherapy17

[back to top]

12 Months Disease Free Survival (DFS)

Participants who were alive and disease free at 12 months. DFS was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete response was disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response was at least a 30% decrease in target lesions. Progression was at least a 20% increase in target lesions and stable disease is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease. (NCT00941655)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Surgery + HIPEC + Systemic Chemotherapy2
Systemic Chemotherapy Alone0

[back to top]

Median Duration of Cytoreduction Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)

Time it takes to perform this complex surgery and HIPEC to reduce tumor burden overall in this disease. (NCT00941655)
Timeframe: up to 12 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Surgery + HIPEC + Systemic Chemotherapy10.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Patients With Limited Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma: Arm II

Time between the first day of treatment and the date of death (NCT00941655)
Timeframe: 12 weeks up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Number)
Patient #3Patient #5Patient #8Patient #10Patient #12Patient #13Patient #14
Systemic Chemotherapy Alone176100080

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Patients With Limited Metastatic Gastric Carcinoma: Arm I

Time between the first day of treatment and the date of death. (NCT00941655)
Timeframe: 12 weeks up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Number)
Patient #1Patient #2Patient #4Patient #6Patient #7Patient #9Patient #11Patient #15
Surgery + HIPEC + Systemic Chemotherapy1911114145120

[back to top]

Gillys Stage Before and After Surgery

Gillys stage measures the completeness of the cytoreduction and is recorded before and after surgery. It is used to classify disease burden and determine prognosis. Stage 0 is no macroscopic signs of disease, stage 1 is nodules >5mm in one part of the abdomen, stage 2 is nodules >5 mm throughout the abdomen, stage 3 is nodules 5mm to 2 cm, and stage 4 is nodules < 2 cm. (NCT00941655)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionStage (Number)
Patient 1 Before SurgeryPatient 1 After SurgeryPatient 2 Before SurgeryPatient 2 After SurgeryPatient 3 Before SurgeryPatient 3 After SurgeryPatient 4 Before SurgeryPatient 4 After SurgeryPatient 5 Before SurgeryPatient 5 After SurgeryPatient 6 Before SurgeryPatient 6 After SurgeryPatient 7 Before SurgeryPatient 7 After SurgeryPatient 8 Before SurgeryPaitent 8 After Surgery
Surgery + HIPEC + Systemic Chemotherapy0010003100001030

[back to top]

Completeness of Cytoreduction (CCR) Score

CCR is assessed by Sugarbaker's criteria. CCR-0 is no residual tumor. CCR-1 is no residual nodules greater than 2.5 mm in diameter, CCR-2 is no residual nodules greater than 25 mm, and CCR-3 is residual nodules greater than 25 mm. (NCT00941655)
Timeframe: Day 1

InterventionScores on a scale (Number)
Patient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4Patient 5Patient 6Patient 7Patient 8
Surgery + HIPEC + Systemic Chemotherapy00020000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events

Here is the count of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v3.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT00941655)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately, 40.5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Surgery + HIPEC + Systemic Chemotherapy8
Systemic Chemotherapy Alone5

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival Rate at Five Months

(NCT00948935)
Timeframe: 5 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Chemotherapy69

[back to top]

Response Rate From Combination Chemotherapy

(NCT00948935)
Timeframe: 5 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Assessable
Chemotherapy291527

[back to top]

6 Month Progression-free Survival

Percentage of participants surviving six months from the start of study treatment without progression of disease. PFS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of the first documented progression according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, or to death due to any cause. Progression is defined as greater than or equal to a 25% increase in the product of the largest perpendicular diameters of any enhancing lesion or any new enhancing tumor on MRI scans. Patients may also be classified as progressive disease with significant neurologic decline felt to be due to underlying tumor and not attributable to co-morbid event or concurrent medication regardless of MRI findings. (NCT00953121)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade IV, No Bevacizumab Failure47.5
Grade III, No Bevacizumab Failure71.1
Grade IV, Bevacizumab Failure24.0

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Patients alive as of the last follow-up had OS censored at the last follow-up date. Median OS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00953121)
Timeframe: 40 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Grade IV, No Bevacizumab Failure9.3
Grade III, No Bevacizumab Failure16.0
Grade IV, Bevacizumab Failure5.9

[back to top]

Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of first progression according to RANO criteria, or to death due to any cause. Patients alive who had not progressed as of the last follow-up had PFS censored at the last follow-up date. Median PFS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00953121)
Timeframe: 40 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Grade IV, No Bevacizumab Failure5.9
Grade III, No Bevacizumab Failure10.0
Grade IV, Bevacizumab Failure3.6

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Percentage of participants with an objective response (complete response or partial response) based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. A complete response is defined as disappearance of all enhancing tumor on contrast enhanced MRI scan. Patient must be off steroids or only on adrenal maintenance doses. A partial response is defined as greater than or equal to a 50% reduction in the size (products of the largest perpendicular diameters) for all enhancing lesions. No new lesions may arise. Steroids must be stable or decreasing dose. (NCT00953121)
Timeframe: 34 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade IV, No Bevacizumab Failure0
Grade III, No Bevacizumab Failure0
Grade IV, Bevacizumab Failure0

[back to top]

Safety of Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Combination With Irinotecan and Carboplatin

Number of patients experiencing a toxicity greater than or equal to grade 2 treatment-related toxicity (NCT00953121)
Timeframe: 34 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade IV, No Bevacizumab Failure39
Grade III, No Bevacizumab Failure39
Grade IV, Bevacizumab Failure23

[back to top]

Part 2: Number of Participants With Each Type of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-Determined Overall Best Response

Overall best response was determined by RECIST criteria. Types of overall response could be: Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD), Not Assessable (NA) or Incomplete Response/Stable Disease (IR/SD). (NCT00954512)
Timeframe: Up to ~30 days after the final dose of robatumumab (Up to ~14 months)

,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Not Assessable (NA)Incomplete Response/Stable Disease (IR/SD)
Regimen A: FOLFIRI (± Cetuximab) + Robatumumab000200
Regimen B: Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Robatumumab002100
Regimen D: Trastuzumab + Robatumumab001100
Regimen E: mTor Inhibitor (Everolimus) + Robatumumab002100
Regimen F: Gemcitabine (± Erlotinib) + Robatumumab001100

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants Who Experienced One or More Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to this study drug. AEs may include the onset of new illness and the exacerbation of pre-existing conditions. (NCT00954512)
Timeframe: Up to ~30 days after the final dose of robatumumab (Up to ~14 months)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Regimen A: FOLFIRI (± Cetuximab) + Robatumumab2
Regimen B: Carboplatin + Paclitaxel + Robatumumab3
Regimen D: Trastuzumab + Robatumumab2
Regimen E: mTor Inhibitor (Everolimus) + Robatumumab4
Regimen F: Gemcitabine (± Erlotinib) + Robatumumab4

[back to top]

Best Overall Response Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total, representative of all involved organs were to be identified as target lesions. Data were to be collected at Screening, every 6 weeks and at 30 days after the final dose of robatumumab or the standard treatment assigned (whichever was last). The best overall response was to be the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): >30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): >20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions; or Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. (NCT00960063)
Timeframe: Screening, every 6 weeks and at ~30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to ~10.3 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)
Ifosfamide+Etoposide+Robatumumab0201
Temozolomide+Irinotecan+Robatumumab0100

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-robatumumab Antibodies

The incidence of anti-robatumumab antibodies was to be assessed. Only participants who had a negative pre-treatment sample and a post-treatment sample were considered to be evaluable. If a participant had a single sample considered positive in the anti-robatumumab antibody assay (with the exception of pre-treatment positive participants), then they would be counted as positive in the immunogenicity assessment. (NCT00960063)
Timeframe: Prior to 1st and 8th doses of robatumumab, ~30 days after last dose of study drug, and 4 months after last dose of study drug (Up to ~13.3 months)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Temozolomide+Irinotecan+Robatumumab0
Ifosfamide+Etoposide+Robatumumab0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities

Dose-limiting toxicity was defined by the following adverse events (AEs) that were considered possibly or probably related to either robatumumab or to its interaction with the chemotherapy regimen assigned: neutropenia (Grade 4 for >1 week that did not resolve prior to Day 1 of the next cycle; Grade 3-4 neutropenia with Grade ≥2 fever lasting 3 days; neutropenic infection; failure to recover to study entry/eligibility criteria laboratory requirement levels that resulted in a delay of 14 days between treatment cycles), thrombocytopenia (Grade 4 for >1 week that did not resolve prior to Day 1 of the next cycle; Grade 3-4 requiring a platelet transfusion on 2 separate days within a cycle) or all other AEs (Grade ≥3 [any duration] not ameliorable by supportive or symptomatic measures). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE version 4.0) was to be used to grade AEs. (NCT00960063)
Timeframe: Up to ~30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to ~10.3 months)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Temozolomide+Irinotecan+Robatumumab1
Ifosfamide+Etoposide+Robatumumab3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Without Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25 percent (%) increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on gadolinium contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. Percentage of participants achieving PFS without disease progression or death was reported. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan79.31
Temozolomide42.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline for Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

The MMSE briefly measures orientation to time and place, immediate recall, short-term verbal memory, calculation, language and construct ability. Each area tested had a designated point value, the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Orientation to time and placeImmediate recallRepetitions requiredCalculationsShort-term verbal memoryLanguage and construct abilityTotal Score
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan-0.01771-0.00264-0.05763-0.21530.2012-0.1254-0.2871
Temozolomide-0.2110-0.032190.08530-0.21200.1634-0.2057-0.5999

[back to top]

Change From Baseline for EORTC QLQ Brain Neoplasm 20 (BN20) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

EORTC QLQ-BN20 consisted of 20 items assessing visual disorders, motor dysfunction, communication deficit, various disease symptoms (e.g. headaches and seizures), treatment toxicities (e.g. hair loss) and future uncertainty. All of the 20 items are rated on a 4 point Likert scale from 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4=very much, and were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Future uncertaintyVisual disorderMotor dysfunctionCommunication deficitHeadachesDrowsinesHair lossItchy skinWeakness of legsBladder control
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan-5.2779-2.08695.44164.74404.390511.720411.92355.48828.95861.5020
Temozolomide-8.5478-3.2026.54294.6431-3.93898.28057.33286.46907.92451.9710

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

(NCT00967330)
Timeframe: From baseline until end of study (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionyears (Median)
Bevacizumab + IrinotecanNA
TemozolomideNA

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25% increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on Gd-MRI scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: From baseline to the end of the study (up to 4.5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan9.74
Temozolomide5.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline for Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Score at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

KPS is an 11-level score (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100) which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Deterioration in KPS was defined as decrease of 20 or more points in KPS score. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan-3.3399
Temozolomide-5.4909

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Received Corticosteroid for Glioblastoma

Participants used corticosteroids for the glioblastoma condition. Corticosteroids included dexamethasone, methylprednisone, fortecortin, hydrocortisone, urbason, and prednisolone. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: From baseline to Month 6

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan80.0
Temozolomide78.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Response on FLAIR Imaging

"FLAIR lesions were determined as stable, progressive or decreased. FLAIR lesions was determined as progressive only if they were not be attributed to causes apart from tumor infiltration (sequelae of radiation therapy, demyelination, ischemia, infection, seizures, or other treatment effects). Percentage of participants are based on ITT population.~Dis.=Discontinuation." (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: At screening, Baseline, Month 6 and Therapy Discontinuation (Up to 4.5 years)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Screening: Initial Flair Lesion (n=116,54)Screening:Stable Flair Lesion (n=116,54)Baseline:Decreased FLAIR Lesions (n=105,46)Baseline:Initial FLAIR Lesions (n=105,46)Baseline:Progressive FLAIR Lesions (n=105,46)Baseline: Stable FLAIR Lesions (n=105,46)Month 6:Progressive FLAIR Lesions (n=91,28)Month 6: Stable FLAIR Lesions (n=91,28)Therapy Dis.:Decreased FLAIR Lesions (n=55,31)Therapy Dis.:Progressiv FLAIR Lesions (n=55,31)Therapy Dis.:Stable FLAIR Lesions (n=55,31)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan72.417.216.418.114.741.416.462.10.929.317.2
Temozolomide72.216.720.418.511.135.222.229.60.027.829.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued

Discontinuation was defined as the percentage of participants who permanently discontinued treatment in either treatment arm. Percentage of participant with individual discontinuation reason are reported. CNS: central nervous system; CTCAE: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events . Other reason refers to any other reason than the specified ones. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Persisting non-hematological toxicity CTCAE Grade3CNS hemorrhagic event (CTCAE Grade >1)Gastro-intestinal perforation (CTCAE Grade 1-4)OtherParticipant's wishProgressive diseaseProteinuria (nephrotic syndrome) (CTCAE Grade 4)RegularRepeated CTCAE Grade 4 hematological toxicityVenous thrombosis/embolismWound dehiscence requiring medical interventionWound dehiscence requiring surgical intervention
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan00.90.99.5674.10.91.700.90.94.3
Temozolomide1.9005.65.657.4027.80.9000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With A Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) and With A BOR of CR or Partial Response (PR)

BOR was defined as the best response observed for a participant during assessment. Number of participants who had BOR as CR and number of participants who had BOR as CR or PR were reported. Complete response was defined as disappearance of all enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, off steroids, and neurologically stable or improved. Partial response was defined as 50% reduction in size of enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, steroids stable or reduced, and neurologically stable or improved. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: 4 week after radiotherapy (RT) (up to Week 4), >4 Week after RT (up to Week 8) and Month 6

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CR at 4 weeks after RT (n=110,46)CR at >4 weeks after RT (n=95,35)CR at Month 6 (n=91,28)CR or PR at 4 Week after RT (n=110,46)CR or PR at >4 Week after RT (n=95,35)CR or PR at Month 6 (n=91,28)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan1111342185
Temozolomide211633

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of functioning or a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms. The change in global health status was determined to be the difference in values at baseline and each specific visit. The term ''baseline'' refers to the time of randomization to the maintenance phase. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Physical FunctioningRole FunctioningEmotional FunctioningCognitive FunctioningSocial FunctioningGlobal health Status /QoL (ql)FatiqueNausea/VomittingPainDyspnoeaInsomniaAppetite lossConstipationDiarrhoeaFinancial Problems
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan-8.3513-0.76352.2774-2.0188-6.2324-3.11345.52288.955710.68763.7134-2.626613.74238.02306.02304.8435
Temozolomide-6.2511-2.23392.2547-3.8401-4.61980.38552.17794.75971.59260.5046-7.502610.96014.0855-0.14552.1140

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00967330)
Timeframe: From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan16.64
Temozolomide17.30

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival at 16 Weeks After Administration of CS-7017 Combined With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization until the first objective evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to 16 weeks postdose

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FOLFIRI66.7
CS7017 + FOLFIRI59.7

[back to top]

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Occurring in ≥10% of Participants Following Administration of CS-7017 Combined With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

An adverse event (AE) >30 days after last dose of study drug was not included as a treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) unless considered related to treatment. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to 30 days post last dose, up to approximately 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEBlood and Lymphatic System DisordersAnaemiaFebrile neutropeniaLeukopeniaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaEye DisordersGastrointestinal DisordersAbdominal painAbdominal pain upperAphthous stomatitisConstipationDiarrheaNauseaVomitingGeneral Disorders & Administration Site ConditionsAstheniaFace EdemaFatigueMucosal inflammationEdema peripheralPyrexiaInfections & InfestationsInfluenzaInjury, Poisoning, and Procedural ComplicationsInvestigationsWeight decreasedWeight increasedMetabolism and Nutrition DisordersDecreased appetiteDehydrationHypokalaemiaMusculoskeletal and Connective Tissue DisordersPain in extremityBack painNervous System DisordersDizzinessHeadachePsychiatric DisordersRenal and Urinary DisordersReproductive System and Breast DisordersRespiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal DisordersCoughDyspneaSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue DisordersAlopeciaVascular Disorders
CS7017 + FOLFIRI5042357113398492012133039244314915734102116286202817461263143511931956201010
FOLFIRI50241600102147176593336333922091375215416120312374184617531065175721118

[back to top]

Best Overall Response and Objective Response Rate Following Administration of CS-7017 in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

As per Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors v1.0, best overall response was characterized as confirmed complete response (CR) defined as disappearance of all target lesions, confirmed partial response (PR) defined as ≥30% decrease from baseline, stable disease (SD) defined as neither progressive disease (PD) nor PR, and PD defined as ≥20% increase from smallest sum of longest diameter recorded since treatment started. Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as CR + PR. If there is no tumor assessment after the first dose of study drug, the best overall response is classified as Inevaluable. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 3 years postdose

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Confirmed CRConfirmed PRObjective response (confirmed CR+PR)Stable diseaseProgressive diseaseInevaluableBest overall response of SD or better
CS7017 + FOLFIRI010101881230
FOLFIRI0772910238

[back to top]

Median Overall Progression-Free Survival Following Administration of CS-7017 in Combination With Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (FOLFIRI) After Failure of First-line Therapy in Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization until the first objective evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 3 years postdose

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRI4.2
CS7017 + FOLFIRI4.4

[back to top]

Median Overall Progression-Free Survival: Sensitivity Analysis Including Clinical Progression After Administration of CS-7017 and Irinotecan, Leucovorin, and 5-Fluorouracil After Failure of First-line Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first objective documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death resulting from any cause, whichever came first. The sensitivity analysis included clinical progression as an event. (NCT00967616)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 3 years postdose

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRI4.2
CS7017 + FOLFIRI4.4

[back to top]

Incidence and Severity of Central Nervous System (CNS) Hemorrhage and Systemic Hemorrhage

Incidence and severity of CNS hemorrhage and systemic hemorrhage- The adverse events for this study were collected using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0, and have been converted to CTCAE version 4.0 for entry into ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT00979017)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CNS hemorrhage (grade 3)Systemic hemorrhage (all grade 3)
Avastin in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan13

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Patients alive as of the last follow-up had OS censored at the last follow-up date. Median OS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00979017)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Avastin in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan12

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade ≥ 4 Hematologic and ≥ Grade 3 Non-hematologic Toxicities

Incidence of treatment-related, grade ≥ 4 hematologic and ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities- The adverse events for this study were collected using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0, and have been converted to CTCAE version 4.0 for entry into ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT00979017)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade > or = to 4 hematologic toxicityGrade > or = to 3 non-hematologic toxicity
Avastin in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan717

[back to top]

Response Rate

The percentage of participants with a complete or partial response as determined by a modification of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Complete Response (CR) was defined as complete disappearance on MR/CT of all enhancing tumor and mass effect, off all corticosteroids (or receiving only adrenal replacement doses) and accompanied by a stable or improving neurologic examination. Partial Response (PR) was defined as greater than or equal to 50% reduction in tumor size on MR/CT by bi-dimensional measurement, on a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids and accompanied by a stable or improving neurologic examination. Per the criteria, confirmation of response was required. Response rate = CR+PR. (NCT00979017)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Avastin in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan22

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of first progression according to RANO criteria, or to death due to any cause. Per RANO, progression is a ≥ 25% increase in the sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions, worsening T2/FLAIR, any new lesion, or clinical deterioration. Patients alive who had not progressed as of the last follow-up had PFS censored at the last follow-up date. Median PFS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00979017)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Avastin in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan8.6

[back to top]

Number of Cycles on Which Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Coded According to CTC AE Version 5 Were Observed

All grade 3 or 4 or greater non-hematological toxicities. The frequency of each toxicity type will be quantified as the number of reporting periods on which the toxicity of the relevant grade is reported. This measure does not apply to patients enrolled in the VERY LOW RISK group. (NCT00980460)
Timeframe: During protocol therapy up to 1 year after enrollment

,,,
InterventionCycles (Number)
Hearing impairedDiarrheaEnterocolitisNauseaSmall intestinal obstructionVomitingAbdominal distensionAbdominal painColitisAnal mucositisAscitesMalabsorptionMucositis oralConstipationDental cariesTyphlitisDuodenal obstructionEsophageal hemorrhageGastritisIlleusOral painSmall intestinal mucositisColonic hemorrhageDysphagiaEsophagitisGastroparesisGastric fistulaGastrointestinal disorders - Other, specifyObstruction gastricRectal mucositisFeverGeneral disorders and administration site conditions - Other, specifyPainMulti-organ failureIrritabilityInfusion related reactionHypothermiaCatheter related infectionInfections and infestations - Other, specifyMucosal infectionOtitis mediaUrinary tract infectionBiliary tract infectionAbdominal infectionBladder infectionEnterocolitis infectiousDuodenal infectionUpper respiratory infectionEye infectionWound infectionSepsisLung infectionPeritoneal infectionSkin infectionSmall intestine infectionPeriorbital infectionAlanine aminotransferase increasedAspartate aminotransferase increasedActivated partial thromboplastin time prolongedAlkaline phosphatase increasedBlood bilirubin increasedCreatinine increasedGGT increasedWeight lossFibronogen decreasedEjection fraction decreasedInvestigations - Other, specifyWhite blood cell decreasedINR increasedCPK increasedCholesterol highElectrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolongedLipase increasedSerum amylase increasedAnorexiaDehydrationHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypernatremiaHypokalemiaHyponatremiaAcidosisAlkalosisHypocalcemiaHypoalbuminemiaHypomagnesemiaHypophosphatemiaTumor lysis syndromeHypercalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypertriglyceridemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders - Other, specifyPeripheral sensory neuropathyOculomotor nerve disorderAbducens nerve disorderPeripheral motor neuropathySyncopeDysphasiaDepressed level of consciousnessSeizureApneaAtelectasisDyspneaBronchospasmHypoxiaPleural effusionPulmonary edemaStridorRespiratory failureEpistaxisWheezingHypertensionHematomaHypotensionVascular disorders - Other, specifyThromboembolic eventLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionCardiac arrestRight ventricular dysfunctionVentricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders - Other, specifySinus tachycardiaHeart failureMyocardial infarctionBiliary fistulaHepatobiliary disorders - Other, specifyHepatic hemorrhagePortal vein thrombosisPortal hypertensionBiliary anastomotic leakPostoperative hemorrhageGastrointestinal anastomotic leakIntraoperative hemorrhageArthralgiaGeneralized muscle weaknessBack painBone painMuscle weakness lower limbAgitationHallucinationsInsomniaAcute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders - Other, specifyRenal calculiProteinuriaErythema multiformeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - Other, specifyRash maculo-papularEye disorders - Other, specifySurgical and medical procedures - Other, specifyTumor painAllergic reactionAnaphylaxisImmune system disorders - Other, specify
High-risk Group (Regimen H)4151305061000600100000000001111904211109003000502003107016191151661100011111171210503291013212190014110020011003061001114050100000410011000001000000010001012000221
High-risk Group (Regimen W)415010013391000810200141011110000101000012711000040200000100910302014000110000020353001260043370110020230100001022000202131113001111001011120000001000100001001000
Intermediate-risk Group (Regimen F)20150101241103111442121113410000000091610008380031128141152111028372173762110000000301315124148224173112120000531710000221102112006132011210000112101100121114109310123110000
Low-risk Group (Regimen T)14111200000000000000000000000010000001411100000000000000110000000000000000132222410000000000020000000100000000003000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

[back to top]

Disease Status at the End of 2 Courses of Therapy

RECIST v 1.1 and serum alphafetoprotein responses are evaluated separately. RECIST v 1.1 complete response (CR) is defined as disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is defined as reduction of at last 30% in the sum of the longest dimension of all target lesions (CR and PR measured by CT or MRI) between enrollment. Serum alphafetoprotein response is a decrease of at least 90% from the last serum alphafetoprotein measurement from the baseline prior to the start of chemotherapy to the end of cycle 2. This is calculated for HIGH RISK regimen W and HIGH RISK regimen H only. (NCT00980460)
Timeframe: First two cycles of therapy- up to 42 days after enrollment

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
RECIST PR, no AFP responseAFP response, no RECIST responseRECIST response, AFP responseno AFP response, no RECIST response
High-risk Group (Regimen H)310418
High-risk Group (Regimen W)35616

[back to top]

Number of Deaths

Number of patients who experience on-protocol-therapy death possibly, probably or likely related to systemic chemotherapy. This outcome measure applies to INTERMEDIATE RISK patients only. (NCT00980460)
Timeframe: During protocol therapy or within 30 days of the termination of protocol therapy up to 1 year after enrollment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intermediate-risk Group (Regimen F)1

[back to top]

Feasibility of Referral for Liver Transplantation

A patient for whom referral is considered appropriate who receives a consultation after enrollment will be considered a success with respect to feasibility. (NCT00980460)
Timeframe: 3 cycles of therapy - up to 3 months after enrollment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intermediate-risk Group (Regimen F)37
High-risk Group (Regimen H)16

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Estimated 5-year EFS where EFS is calculated as the time from study enrollment to disease progression, disease relapse, occurrence of a second malignant neoplasm, death from any cause or last follow-up whichever occurs first. Kaplan-Meier method is used for estimation. Patients without an event are censored at last contact. (NCT00980460)
Timeframe: Time from patient enrollment to progression, treatment failure, death from any cause, diagnosis of a second malignant neoplasm, or last follow-up, assessed up to 5 years

InterventionPercent Probability (Number)
Very Low-risk Group100
Low-risk Group (Regimen T)87.21
Intermediate-risk Group (Regimen F)87.03
High-risk Group (Regimen W)43.61
High-risk Group (Regimen H)46.38

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Response was determined as indicated in the protocol. (NCT00991952)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment for up to 3 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgression of Disease
Irinotecan Hydrochloride014
Irinotecan Hydrochloride and Alvocidib148

[back to top]

Dose Limiting Toxicity

Number of participants with dose limiting toxicity events (NCT00993044)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Arm2

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Temsirolimus

The MTD is the dose preceding that at which at least 2 out of 3 patients in the treatment group experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT is defined as grade 3 neutropenia on retreatment day, a grade 4 febrile neutropenia, a drug-related grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity (except fatigue, nausea, vomiting or grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction) or a grade 2 or greater motor or sensory neuropathy (NCT00996346)
Timeframe: Up to 1 month

Interventionmilligrams (Number)
Irinotecan&Temsirolimus:All Arms20

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Irinotecan

The MTD is the dose preceding that at which at least 2 out of 3 patients in the treatment group experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT is defined as grade 3 neutropenia on retreatment day, a grade 4 febrile neutropenia, a drug-related grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity (except fatigue, nausea, vomiting or grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction) or a grade 2 or greater motor or sensory neuropathy (NCT00996346)
Timeframe: Up to 1 month

Interventionmilligrams/meter squared (Number)
Irinotecan&Temsirolimus:All Arms80

[back to top]

Response Rate of Cetuximab 500mg/m2/Week in Combination With Irinotecan in the Enrolled Patient Population

(NCT01004159)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of particitpants (Number)
Cetuximab With Irinotecan5

[back to top]

12-week Progression Free Survival Rate Upon Escalation of Cetuximab Dose to 500mg/m2 in Combination With Irinotecan After Progression on Standard Dose Therapy in Patients With KRS Wild Type Colorectal Cancer

(NCT01004159)
Timeframe: 12 week

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cetuximab With Irinotecan50

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

TTF was defined as the time from randomization to treatment discontinuation for any reason. For subjects on drug at the analysis cut off date or lost to follow up, TTF was censored at the trial discontinuation date or at the analysis cut off date, whichever occurred first. (NCT01008475)
Timeframe: Time from randomization until discontinuation assessed up to 18 months (i.e data cut-off date: 09 Oct 2013)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Standard of Care (SoC)5.2
EMD 525797 500 mg + SoC4.3
EMD 525797 1000 mg + SoC4.8

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Tumor Response

Tumor response was defined as the presence of at least 1 confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) as judged by RECIST version 1.0. CR was defined for target lesions (TLs) as the disappearance of all lesions, and for non-target lesions (NTLs) as the disappearance of all non-target non-measurable lesions and/or normalization of serum levels of tumor markers. PR was defined for TLs as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease from baseline (BL) in the sum of longest diameter (SLD) of TLs. (NCT01008475)
Timeframe: Time from randomization up to 18 months (i.e data cut-off date: 09 Oct 2013)

,,
InterventionSubjects (Number)
CRPR
EMD 525797 1000 mg + SoC018
EMD 525797 500 mg + SoC119
Standard of Care (SoC)217

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of objective radiographic disease progression (PD). PD per RECIST v 1.0 was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as the reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since treatment started, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion or appearance of new lesions. For subjects who did not progress or who were without any post baseline tumor assessment, TTP was censored at their last tumor assessment date, or at the randomization date, whichever occurred last. (NCT01008475)
Timeframe: Time from randomization until disease progression assessed up to 18 months (i.e data cut-off date: 09 Oct 2013)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Standard of Care (SoC)5.8
EMD 525797 500 mg + SoC5.6
EMD 525797 1000 mg + SoC6.5

[back to top]

Safety Part: Number of Subjects Experiencing DLTs (Dose Limiting Toxicity)

DLT was defined as any Grade 4 hematologic toxicity or Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity assessed as related to trial treatment by the Investigator and/or Sponsor and confirmed by the safety monitoring committee (SMC) to be relevant to the combination treatment within the first cycle of therapy. Any Grade 3 or 4 non haematological toxicity, any Grade 4 hematological toxicity, treatment related deaths within the first 2 weeks of therapy. Toxicities excluded from DLT: alopecia, rash, nausea, vomiting and hypomagnesemia of Grade 3 or 4 severity, Grade 4 neutropenia or leukopenia lasting for =< 5 days and not associated with fever; Single laboratory values out of normal range without any clinical correlation and resolve within 7 days; Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea without adequate supportive care. Adequate supportive care has been administered and Grade 4 diarrhea persists (investigator decision); isolated Grade 4 lymphocytopenia and thrombocytopenia without clinical correlation. (NCT01008475)
Timeframe: Time from the first dose of study drug up to 2 weeks

Interventionsubjects (Number)
Safety Part: EMD 525797 250 mg + SoC0
Safety Part: EMD 525797 500 mg + SoC0
Safety Part: EMD525797 750 mg + SoC0
Safety Part: EMD 525797 1000 mg +SoC0

[back to top]

Randomized Part: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the randomization date to first documented sign of objective radio-graphic disease progression (PD) as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1. (RECIST 1.0) or death from any cause if reported within 12 weeks from the last tumor assessment. PD per RECIST v 1.0 was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as the reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since treatment started, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesion or appearance of new lesions. Subjects who did not progress or died at the time of analyses, or subjects who died without previously radio-graphically documented PD and death was observed after more than 12 weeks of last tumor assessment without progression, these subjects were censored at their last tumor assessment date or date of randomization, whichever occurred last. (NCT01008475)
Timeframe: Time from randomization until progressive disease or death; assessed up to 18 months (i.e data cut-off date: 09 Oct 2013)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Standard of Care (SoC)5.6
EMD 525797 500 mg + SoC5.4
EMD 525797 1000 mg + SoC5.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Time

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. For subjects who were still alive at the analysis cut off date or lost to follow up, survival was censored at the last recorded date the subject was known to be alive or at the analysis cut off date, whichever occurred first. (NCT01008475)
Timeframe: Time from randomization until death assessed up to 18 months (i.e data cut-off date: 09 Oct 2013)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Standard of Care (SoC)11.6
EMD 525797 500 mg + SoC15.0
EMD 525797 1000 mg + SoC14.4

[back to top]

Event Free Survival

(NCT01012609)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pts With High-grade Astrocytoma8.9
Pts With Diffuse Pontine Tumor6.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Development of Rash, Either Acneiform and/or Desquamation

The purpose is to investigate whether the rash associated with cetuximab is secondary to an inflammatory pathway initiated and mediated by the action of cetuximab on host cells. (NCT01012609)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pts With High-grade Astrocytoma60
Pts With Diffuse Pontine Tumor53.3

[back to top]

Time to Progression

(NCT01012609)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pts With High-grade Astrocytoma9.02
Pts With Diffuse Pontine Tumor7.12

[back to top]

Number of Samples Demonstrating EGFR Copy Number Gain

Identify gene transcripts for putative cetuximab (NCT01012609)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionsamples (Number)
With GFR copy number gainNo GFR copy number gain
HGA and DIPG Tumors Analyzed181

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Toxicity

To determine the safety of cetuximab administered weekly in conjunction with involved field external beam radiation therapy for diffuse pontine tumors and high-grade astrocytomas, toxicities will be assessed via the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 3.0) (NCT01012609)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pts With High-grade Astrocytoma20
Pts With Diffuse Pontine Tumor25

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT01012609)
Timeframe: Up to 43 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pts With High-grade Astrocytoma17.4
Pts With Diffuse Pontine Tumor12.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With High-grade Astrocytoma and Diffuse Pontine Tumors Achieving One Year Progression Free Survival.

(NCT01012609)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pts With High-grade Astrocytoma5
Pts With Diffuse Pontine Tumor6

[back to top]

Safety of Panitumumab in Combination With Irinotecan

Number of participants experiencing a toxicity ≥ grade 3 as graded per CTCAE v.3.0 (NCT01017653)
Timeframe: 16 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Panitumumab and Irinotecan10

[back to top]

Relationship Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGF-R) Mutational Analysis and Efficacy or Toxicity

Number of participants with an abnormal fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) interpretation that 1) survived < 6 months and 2) experienced a ≥ grade 3 toxicity as graded per CTCAE v.3.0 (NCT01017653)
Timeframe: 16 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Abnormal FISH Interpretation & Survived <6 monthsAbnormal FISH Interpretation & ≥ grade 3 toxicity
Panitumumab and IrinotecanNANA

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Patients alive as of the last follow-up had OS censored at the last follow-up date. Median OS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT01017653)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Panitumumab and Irinotecan4.6

[back to top]

6-month Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Percentage of participants surviving six months from the start of study treatment without progression of disease. PFS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of the first documented progression according to the Macdonald criteria, or to death due to any cause. Macdonald criteria are standard criteria in neuro-oncology. Tumor assessment was made according to the adapted MacDonald criteria based on the combined evaluation of: 1) assessment of the MRI scan for measurable, evaluable, and new lesions (made by the independent external expert too), 2) overall assessment of neurological performance (made by the investigator), and 3) concomitant steroid use (as reported by the investigator). (NCT01017653)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Panitumumab and Irinotecan12.5

[back to top]

Effect of Panitumumab in Combination With Irinotecan on Corticosteroid Dose

Average change in corticosteroid dose from baseline to the end of cycle 1. (NCT01017653)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 29

Interventionmg (Number)
Panitumumab and IrinotecanNA

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Number of participants with an objective response (complete response or partial response) based on modified Macdonald criteria. A complete response is defined as the disappearance of all enhancing rumor and mass effect, off all corticosteroids, accompanied by a stable or improving neurologic examination, and maintained for at least 4 weeks. A partial response is defined as greater than or equal to 50% reduction in tumor size on MR (magnetic resonance) / CT(computed tomography) by bi-dimensional measurement on a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids, accompanied by a stable or improving neurologic examination, and maintained for at least 4 weeks. (NCT01017653)
Timeframe: 16 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Panitumumab and Irinotecan0

[back to top]

One-Year Overall Survival

Percentage of participants surviving 12 months from the start of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from the date of study treatment initiation to the date of the death due to any cause. (NCT01017653)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Panitumumab and Irinotecan12.5

[back to top]

Feasibility of the Addition of Temozolomide to Chemotherapy Determined by Patient Enrollment

Proportion of no Grade 4+ non-hematologic toxicity. (NCT01055314)
Timeframe: From start to week 26 of therapy

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
Temozolomide0.7097

[back to top]

Response Rate (CR + PR)

Proportion of patients with complete or partial response. Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of the tumor confirmed at > 4 weeks. Partial Response (PR): At least 64% decrease in volume compared to the measurement obtained at study enrollment; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01055314)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until a maximum of 2 cycles (21 days per cycle) of treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicities

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
IMC-A120.7667
Temozolomide0.7846

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0

Number of patients with grade 3+ adverse events (AE) during therapy. (Grade 3+) = (Grade 3 + Grade 4 + Grade 5) . Grade 3: Severe and undesirable AE; Grade 4: Life threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5: Death related to AE. (NCT01055314)
Timeframe: Up to 54 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
IMC-A1289
Temozolomide61

[back to top]

Feasibility of the Addition of Cixutumumab to Chemotherapy Determined by Patient Enrollment

Proportion of no Grade 3+ cardiac toxicity. (NCT01055314)
Timeframe: From start to week 26 of therapy

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
IMC-A120.9390

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival

Probability of no relapse, secondary malignancy, or death after 3 years in the study. (NCT01055314)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionProbability (Number)
IMC-A120.1627
Temozolomide0.1919

[back to top]

Duration of Response and Stable Disease Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-Type KRAS Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy

Duration of response was defined for participants with complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) as the time from the date of the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease. Duration of stable disease (SD) was defined for participants whose best response was SD at the time from the randomization date to the date of the first documentation of progressive disease. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, CR is defined as a disappearance of all target lesions, PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and stable disease (SD) is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD; at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. (NCT01075048)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 80 weeks postdose

,
Interventionweeks (Mean)
Duration of responseDuration of stable disease
Phase 2: ARQ 197+Cetuximab+Irinotecan28.8429.76
Phase 2: Placebo+Cetuximab+Irinotecan29.4224.48

[back to top]

Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Reported in ≥ 10% of Participants Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that had an onset date on or after the first dose of study drug, cetuximab, or irinotecan up to and including 30 days after the last dose of any study drug and worsened in severity after the first dose of study drug relative to the pre-treatment state. (NCT01075048)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose, up to 5 years 1 month

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEBlood and Lymphatic System DisordersAnaemiaNeutropeniaGastrointestinal DisordersAbdominal painConstipationDiarrheaNauseaStomatitisVomitingGeneral Disorders & Administration Site ConditionsAstheniaFatigueMetabolism and Nutrition DisordersDecreased appetiteDehydrationHypomagnesaemiaNervous System DisordersHeadachePsychiatric DisordersInsomniaRespiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal DisordersCoughSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue DisordersAlopeciaDermatitis acneiformDry skinRashSkin fissures
All ARQ 1977127922561511383482650833261388189178221167211215428
Phase 1: ARQ 197+Cetuximab+Irinotecan942493156149073212425154954463
Phase 2: ARQ 197+Cetuximab+Irinotecan62237184712103328722418262311761471271775816811365
Phase 2: Placebo+Cetuximab+Irinotecan59281913471611302741833621207661241042064914910343

[back to top]

Treatment-Emergent Infection and Infestation Adverse Events Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that had an onset date on or after the first dose of study drug, cetuximab, or irinotecan up to and including 30 days after the last dose of any study drug and worsened in severity after the first dose of study drug relative to the pre-treatment state. (NCT01075048)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose, up to 5 years 1 month

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Infections and InfestationsAbscess jawAbscess neckBronchitisCandidiasisCellulitisCystitisDevice-related infectionDiverticulitisEar infectionEye infectionFolliculitisFungal infectionGastroenteritisHerpes zosterHerpes simplexHordeolumInfectionInfluenzaKidney infectionLabyrinthitisLaryngitisLocalised infectionNail infectionNasopharyngitisOral pustuleParonychiaPharyngitisPneumoniaPyodermaRash pustularRespiratory tract infectionRespiratory tract infection viralSinusitisSkin infectionTooth abscessTooth infectionTracheitisTracheobronchitisUpper respiratory tract infectionUrinary tract infectionUrosepsisViral infection
All ARQ 19737003130110212110011111032161211222100023211
Phase 1: ARQ 197+Cetuximab+Irinotecan6000110100001000000100020001100000000000000
Phase 2: ARQ 197+Cetuximab+Irinotecan31003020010211110011011012160111222100023211
Phase 2: Placebo+Cetuximab+Irinotecan24111011002001011102000111050121010112100400

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Using Computed Best Response Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause (as of data cutoff 12 Oct 2012). (NCT01075048)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 80 weeks postdose

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Placebo+Cetuximab+Irinotecan7.3
Phase 2: ARQ 197+Cetuximab+Irinotecan8.3

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-Type K-ras Oncogene (KRAS) Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause (as of data cutoff 12 Oct 2012). (NCT01075048)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 80 weeks postdose

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Placebo+Cetuximab+Irinotecan7.3
Phase 2: ARQ 197+Cetuximab+Irinotecan8.3

[back to top]

Best Overall Tumor Response and Objective Response Rate Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy

Best overall tumor response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria included complete response (CR) defined as the disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR) defined as a ≥30% decrease in the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD) defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD; at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. Objective response was defined as CR+PR. (NCT01075048)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 2 years 10 months postdose

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete response (CR)Partial response (PR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)Objective response (CR+PR)Inevaluable
Phase 2: ARQ 197+Cetuximab+Irinotecan027229272
Phase 2: Placebo+Cetuximab+Irinotecan0192213193

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Following Treatment With Tivantinib (ARQ 197) in Combination With Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Participants With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With Wild-Type K-ras Oncogene (KRAS) Who Have Received Front-Line Systemic Therapy

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization date to the date of death. (NCT01075048)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 5 years 1 month postdose

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Overall survival (12 Oct 2012 data cutoff)Overall survival (29 Mar 2013 data cutoff)Overall survival (25 Jul 2013 data cutoff)Overall survival (20 Feb 2015 data cutoff)
Phase 2: ARQ 197+Cetuximab+IrinotecanNA19.819.822.3
Phase 2: Placebo+Cetuximab+Irinotecan17.616.916.316.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. (NCT01079780)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the 3rd year, then annually up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (IC)19.3
Arm B (ICR)15.0
Arm C (mICR)19.2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-fee survival is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death without documentation of progression. Censoring occurred at the date of last disease assessment without progression for cases without documentation of progression, except for cases where death occurred within a short period of time (4 months) following the date last known progression-free, in which case the death was considered an event.~Progression is defined as appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm." (NCT01079780)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the 3rd year, then annually up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (IC)5.98
Arm B (ICR)7.03
Arm C (mICR)9.20

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With an Objective Response Rate (CR or PR)

Objective response is defined as either complete response or partial response. Complete response is defined as disappearance of all lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT01079780)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for the 3rd year, then annually up to 5 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A (IC)0.23
Arm B (ICR)0.44
Arm C (mICR)0.36

[back to top] [back to top]

Median Progression Free Survival

Defined as the length of time from the start of treatment that half of the patients are still alive and without disease progression. Progression is evaluated by RECIST 1.0 or CA125 if no measurable disease (PR: CA125 decreases by > 50%; CR: CA125 decreases to the normal range; progression is defined on the basis of a confirmed doubling of CA125 levels from either the upper limit of normal or the nadir CA125 level) (NCT01091259)
Timeframe: up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan With Bevacizumab6.8

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

Defined as the length of time from the start of treatment that half of the patients are still alive. (NCT01091259)
Timeframe: up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Irinotecan With Bevacizumab15.4

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of all patients with confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). PR and CR are evaluated by RECIST 1.0 or CA125 if no measurable disease (PR: CA125 decreases by > 50%; CR: CA125 decreases to the normal range). (NCT01091259)
Timeframe: up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Irinotecan With Bevacizumab27.6

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 6 Months

The PFS rate at 6 months is the percentage of patients that experience a PFS event during the first 6 months in the study. The PFS is defined as the time from date of first dose of study medication to the date of first documented disease progression, or death from any cause, whichever is first. Patients who die without a reported prior progression will be considered to have progressed on the day of their death. Progression is evaluated by Response and Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.0 or CA125 criteria if no measurable disease as doubling of CA125 levels from either the upper limit of normal or the nadir CA125 level. (NCT01091259)
Timeframe: 6 months from the start of treatment

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Irinotecan With Bevacizumab55.2

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3 and Higher Toxicities

(NCT01091259)
Timeframe: up to 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
DiarrheaFatiguePainHypertensionNauseaProteinuriaVomitingFebrile neutropeniaGI obstruction: colonGI perforationLeukopenia
Irinotecan With Bevacizumab53322221111

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease (SD)

Duration of SD was calculated as the number of months the participants remained in CR, PR or SD. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)8.81
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)8.65
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)8.98

[back to top]

Duration of Overall Complete Response

Duration of complete response was calculated as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of CR. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)8.35
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)6.05
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)12.89

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease Within 12 Weeks From Start of Treatment

Early progression was the proportion of participants with progressive disease within 12 weeks from the start of treatment. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)9.0
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)13.0
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)18.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response

Best overall response is defined as the best response recorded from the date of randomization until disease progression or recurrence. Complete response (CR): at least 2 determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression; Partial response (PR): at least 2 determinations of PR at least 4 weeks apart before progression; Stable disease (SD): at least one SD assessment; Progressive Disease (PD): Disease progression or death due to underlying cancer. CR: Complete disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of all target lesions; PD: At least 20% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameter of all target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for CR or PR or increase in lesions; (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRPRSDPD
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)1.0932.6152.1714.13
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)5.3228.7245.7420.21
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)5.4946.1539.568.79

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Overall Response

Duration of overall response included participants who achieved a CR or PR. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)6.51
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)6.61
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)9.12

[back to top]

Time to Progression Excluding Deaths

The failure event was defined as tumor progression excluding deaths due to any reason. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)8.81
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)8.48
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)7.40

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure is defined as a composite endpoint measuring time from date of randomization to discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression, death, treatment toxicity, insufficient therapeutic response, failure to return, refusing treatment, being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)6.67
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)6.87
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)5.75

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression Excluding Deaths

The failure event was defined as tumor progression excluding deaths due to any reason. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)71.29
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)81.37
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)75.73

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death

Disease progression was defined according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) guidelines and best clinical practices. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)86.14
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)90.20
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)88.35

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of CR or PR

CR: Complete disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of all target lesions; (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)52.0
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)34.0
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)34.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

Overall survival is defined as the time from date of randomization until death from any cause (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)67.33
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)71.57
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)73.79

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease

Stable disease rate was the proportion of participants who achieved CR, PR, or SD. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)91.0
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)86.0
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)80.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as discontinuation of treatment for any reason, including disease progression, death, treatment toxicity, insufficient therapeutic response, failure to return, refusing treatment, being unwilling to cooperate and withdrawing consent. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)100.0
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)99.02
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)99.03

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the time from date of randomization until objective tumor progression or death due to any cause. It includes deaths and thus can be correlated to overall survival. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)8.35
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)8.15
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)7.27

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from date of randomization until death from any cause; Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for analysis. (NCT01131078)
Timeframe: Randomization, Weeks 3, 6 and 9, and every 3 months up to 5 years or Death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Irinotecan + Capecitabine (1000 mg/m^2)22.75
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (1250 mg/m^2)19.76
Bevacizumab + Capecitabine (650 mg/m^2)18.02

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS)

ECOG-PS measured participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (greater than[ >] 50 percent [%] of waking hours), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 11.5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 1Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 2Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 3Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 4Participants With ECOG-PS Grade 5
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI12200

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as clinically significant adverse events (AEs) occurring less than or equal to (<=) 28 days after commencing study treatment and considered by the investigator to be possibly or probably related to study treatment. Toxicity was evaluated according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI CTCAE v.4.0). (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (each cycle length=28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI2

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examinations

Physical examination included examination of the head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, neck, heart, chest, lungs, abdomen, extremities, skin, lymph nodes, and neurological status. (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 11.5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI2

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse Events were defined as TEAEs if they started on or after the date and time of administration of the first dose of study drug during the study. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any change in hematology, clinical chemistry, urine values and regular measurement of vital signs which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator were recorded as TEAE. (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 11.5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI5

[back to top]

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Parameter

ECG was to be a complete standardized 12-lead recording. The ECGs were reviewed by the investigator or designee prior to study drug administration as part of the participant's standard of care. (NCT01133990)
Timeframe: From date of first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 11.5 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: E7820 40 mg/Day + FOLFIRI1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 Global Health Status

The EORTC QLQ-C30 (v. 3.0) is a self-administered, cancer-specific questionnaire with multidimensional scales assessing 15 domains (5 functional domains, 9 symptoms, and global health status). A linear transformation was applied to standardize the raw scores to range between 0 and 100 per developer guidelines. For the functional domains and global health status scale, higher scores represent a better level of functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores represent a greater degree of symptoms. Maximum improvement is the best post-baseline change. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Baseline Up to 171 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI4.0
Placebo + FOLFIRI6.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol- 5D (EQ-5D)

The EQ-5D is a generic, multidimensional, health status instrument. The profile allows participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and mood using a 3-level scale (no problem, some problems, and major problems). These combinations of attributes were converted into a weighted health-state Index Score according to the United Kingdom (UK) population-based algorithm. The possible values for the Index Score ranged from -0.59 (severe problems in all 5 dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in any dimension). A negative change indicated a worsening of the participant's health status. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30-Day Follow-Up (FU) up to 171 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI-0.097
Placebo + FOLFIRI-0.103

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. For participants not known to have died as of the cut-off date, OS was censored at the last known date alive. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Randomization to Date of Death from Any Cause Up to 39.36 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI13.3
Placebo + FOLFIRI11.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Objective Response (Objective Response Rate)

The objective response rate is equal to the proportion of participants achieving a best overall response of partial response or complete response (PR + CR). Response was defined using RECIST, v. 1.1 criteria. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm and normalization of tumor marker level of non-target lesions; PR was defined as having at least a 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum diameter. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Randomization until Disease Progression Up to 38.01 Months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI13.4
Placebo + FOLFIRI12.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objectively determined progressive disease (PD) [according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v). 1.1] or death due to any cause, whichever was first. PD is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). Participants who died without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the day of their death. Participants who did not progress or were lost to follow-up were censored at the day of their last radiographic tumor assessment. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Randomization to Measured PD or Date of Death from Any Cause Up to 38.01 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI5.7
Placebo + FOLFIRI4.5

[back to top]

Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Ramucirumab

(NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Preinfusion and 1 hour postinfusion in Cycles 3, 5, 9, 13, and 17

Interventionmicrograms/milliliter (ug/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cmin Dose 3 (n=248)Cmin Dose 5 (n=154)Cmin Dose 9 (n=27)Cmin Dose 13 (n=11)Cmin Dose 17 (n=5)Cmax Dose 3 (n=88)Cmax Dose 5 (n=51)Cmax Dose 9 (n=18)Cmax Dose 13 (n=12)Cmax Dose 17 (n=7)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI46.365.177.975.972.0221.0243.0262.0307.0253.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Anti-Ramucirumab Antibodies

Blood samples were tested to determine if a participant reacted to ramucirumab by producing anti-ramucirumab antibodies. Samples were identified as treatment emergent anti-drug antibody (TE ADA) if the post-treatment sample had an increase of at least 4 fold in titer from pre-treatment values. If the pre-treatment value was not detected or was not present, a 1:20 post-treatment titer was required to indicate treatment emergence. The percentage of participants with TE ADA was calculated as: (the number of participants with TE ADA / total number of participants with at least 1 post-treatment immunogenicity sample analyzed)*100. (NCT01183780)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 3, 5, and 30-Day FU

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Immunogenicity Any Time During Study (n=516, 512)Immunogenicity Post-Treatment (n=477, 473)
Placebo + FOLFIRI5.53.8
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI5.63.1

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Percentage Probability of remaining event-free 5 years after enrollment estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier (NCT01217437)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years after enrollment

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Arm I (Temozolomide, Irinotecan Hydrochloride)1.85
Arm II (Temozolomide, Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Bevacizumab)15.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Percentage Probability of remaining alive 5 years after enrollment estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier (NCT01217437)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years after enrollment

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Arm I (Temozolomide, Irinotecan Hydrochloride)2.43
Arm II (Temozolomide, Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Bevacizumab)13.6

[back to top]

Response

Patient's best response during protocol therapy coded as complete response, partial response or no response. (NCT01217437)
Timeframe: Up to 12 cycles of therapy (11 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseNo Response
Arm I (Temozolomide, Irinotecan Hydrochloride)01632
Arm II (Temozolomide, Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Bevacizumab)81424

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Death (NCT01226719)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFOXIRI+Panitumumab RegimenNA

[back to top]

To Determine the Acute Toxicity Produced by This Regimen.

The analyses of safety will be based on the frequency of adverse events and their severity for patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. (NCT01226719)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RashDiarrheaFatigueNauseaMucositisPeripheral neuropathyVomitingAnorexiaCold sensitivityConstipationDehydrationLeukopeniaAnemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaNail changesNeutropeniaTaste alterationThrombocytopeniaWeight lossAbdominal painAlopeciaDepressionDizzinessInsomniaAlkaline phosphatase increasedALT increasedAnxietyAST increasedAstheniaBack painBlood bicarbonate increasedDecreased ejection fractionDry mouthDysesthesiaDyspepsiaEdemaEpistaxisFlashersHand-foot syndromeHematocheziaHemorrhoidsHyperpigmentationHypertensionHypoalbuminemiaHyponatremiaInfection - otherInfusion related reactionMemory lossOral infectionParaphasiaPruritusSpeech impairmentSwollen tongue
FOLFOXIRI+Panitumumab Regimen1298876544444333333332222211111111111111111111111111111

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01226719)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of evaluable participants (Number)
FOLFOXIRI+Panitumumab Regimen75

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01226719)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFOXIRI+Panitumumab Regimen13.3

[back to top]

R0 Resection Rate

To determine the rate of complete (R0) resection for patients treated with this regimen. (NCT01226719)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of patients with surgery (Number)
FOLFOXIRI+Panitumumab Regimen100

[back to top]

Response Duration

Duration of the partial or total response to the treatment. Evaluation and classification according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab8.66

[back to top]

Frequency of Adverse Events

"Frequency and type of adverse events (AEs). AEs were coded according to NCI CTCAE V3.0 and classified by frequency, relatedness to study treatment (related/not related) and severity (Grade).~Severity ranges from grade 1 (low intensity) to Grade 5 (max. intensity, death)" (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEs72100462Grade 3 or higher AEs72100462Grade 5 AEs72100462Treatment related AEs of any grade72100462Treatment related AEs grade 3 or higher72100462
noyes
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab198
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab20
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab138
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab80
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab5
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab213
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab176
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab42
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab101
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab117

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

"Measurements according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Main techniques: CT-scan. Two groups will be defined based on the score built from the proposed clinical variables and biomarkers. Instead of a binomial distribution, a Log-rank method has been used to calculate the sample size in order to include all the incidents during the follow-up. Expecting a minimum 20% difference (60 vs. 40%) on PFS at 12 months between groups and with the following assumptions:~Alpha error (bilateral): 5% Beta error: 20% Results are reported by subgroups to compare outcome measure according to BRAF mutation. All patients belong to same treatment/study arm." (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
WT BRAF - FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab11.4
Mutant BRAF - FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab5.9

[back to top]

Secondary Biomarkers Analysis

The secondary biomarkers in serum and tumoral tissue will be analysed in order to predict the acquired resistance. (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PI3K and PTEN72100462IGF-1RP/MMP772100462
UKWTMutant
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab69
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab98
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab14
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab158
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab23
FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

"Measured as time in months from start of study treatment to death or lost to follow up.~Results are reported by subgroups to compare outcome measure according to BRAF mutation. All patients belong to same treatment/study arm." (NCT01276379)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
WT BRAF - FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab32.6
Mutant BRAF - FOLFIRI (m) or FOLFOX-6 (m) + Cetuximab9.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants That Experienced Any Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT) During the DLT Assessment Period

DLTs were adverse events (AEs) possibly related to study drug that met the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE, version 4.03): Grade 4 neutropenia ≥7 days or ≥Grade 3 with bacteremia or sepsis; Absolute neutrophil count <1.0x10^9/Liters with fever ≥38.3°Celsius requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or ≥Grade 3 with bleeding requiring platelet transfusion; ≥Grade 3 altered coagulation tests and no anticoagulation; ≥Grade 4 or uncontrolled hypertension; ≥Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (except non-clinically significant Grade 3 events like electrolyte abnormality, hypersensitivity, and arthralgia/myalgia); urine protein >3 grams/24 hours; study drug-related toxicity causing Cycle 3, Day 1 treatment delay until Day 44 or later. Grade 3 or Grade 4 infusion-related reaction (hypersensitivity) due to ramucirumab or FOLFIRI, not a DLT. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 through Day 1, Cycle 3 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)1

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Ramucirumab

Reported for Day 1, Cycle 1 is AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity [AUC(0-inf)] and for Day 1, Cycle 5 is AUC over the dosing interval at steady state AUC(tau,ss). (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventionmicrograms*day/milliliter (mcg*day/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=4)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)16001690

[back to top]

Best Overall Response [Anti-Tumor Activity of FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)]

Best overall response evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) criteria. Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions, with the short axes of any target lymph nodes reduced to <10 millimeters (mm). Partial Response (PR): at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (including the short axes of any target lymph nodes), taking as reference the baseline sum diameter. Progressive Disease (PD): an increase of at least 20% in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (included baseline sum if that was the smallest on study). In addition, the sum must have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (the appearance of 1 or more new lesions was considered progression). Stable Disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter since treatment started. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks until PD (up to 49 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)0141

[back to top]

Clearance (CL) of Ramucirumab

The total body CL of ramucirumab on Day 1, Cycle 1 and on Day 1, Cycle 5, which was also considered CL at steady state (CLss), is reported. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventionmilliliters per hour (mL/hr) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=4)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)11.410.4

[back to top]

Half Life (t1/2) of Ramucirumab

t1/2 is the time required for the plasma/serum concentration to decrease 50%. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventiondays (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=6)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)7.388.55

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serum Anti-IMC-1121B Antibodies (Immunogenicity)

(NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 5 (Week 9), Cycle 6 (Week 11), Cycle 7 (Week 13), and Cycle 9 (Week 17) [(1 cycle=14 days)]

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=5)Day 1, Cycle 6 (n=1)Day 1, Cycle 7 (n=3)Day 1, Cycle 9 (n=4)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)0000

[back to top]

Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss) of Ramucirumab

Vss is the theoretical volume in which the total amount of study drug would need to be uniformly distributed during steady state to produce the same concentration as it is in plasma/serum. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

InterventionLiters (L) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=4)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)2.513.06

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Ramucirumab

The Cmax of ramucirumab in serum on Day 1, Cycle 1 and on Day 1, Cycle 5, which was also considered Cmax at steady state (Cmax,ss), is reported. (NCT01286818)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 and Day 1, Cycle 5 (1 cycle=14 days)

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Day 1, Cycle 1 (n=6)Day 1, Cycle 5 (n=2)
FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)245267

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

"1.Phase I - Assess the safety and toxicities of IC with Olaparib escalating to ICM with Olaparib in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer and determine the phase 2 dose. The number of subjects who experienced a dose limiting toxicity was assessed.Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as any of the following study drug-related events experienced during Cycle 1:~Thrombocytopenia with platelets <25,000 x106/l > 7 days. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≥7 days. Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 or greater non-haematological toxicities; excluding grade 3 diarrhoea, nausea or vomiting despite adequate treatment and grade 3 fatigue, lethargy and GGT elevation.~Delay of >2 weeks for next scheduled IC/ICM for reasons of toxicity." (NCT01296763)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dose Level 10
Dose Level 22
Dose Level 52

[back to top]

Number of Years From Cycle 1, Day 1 On-Study to Date of Death

The overall survival of subjects with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with Irinotecan, Cisplatin, Olaparib, with escalation to the addition of Mitomycin-C. Survival from cycle 1, day 1 on-study to date of death was assessed. (NCT01296763)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionyears (survival) from C1D1 to death (Mean)
Dose Level 11.43
Dose Level 20.44
Dose Level 50.60

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

To compare overall survival (OS) between ARM A and ARM B. OS is defined as the time from randomization until death as a result of any cause. (NCT01298570)
Timeframe: 5.5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A13.8
Arm B11.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

To compare PFS between regorafenib + FOLFIRI chemotherapy (ARM A) versus placebo + FOLFIRI (ARM B) in patients failing one prior oxaliplatin-containing regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer. PFS is defined as the time from randomization until metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) progression or death as a result of any cause. Radiographic response will be measured by RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria, indicating if subject experienced a Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), no response or less response than Partial or Progressive; or Progressive Disease (PD), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01298570)
Timeframe: 5.5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A6.1
Arm B5.3

[back to top]

Drug Metabolism

To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of FOLFIRI between a subset of patients receiving regorafenib (ARM A) and patients receiving placebo (Arm B). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) levels of the irinotecan metabolite SN-38 were compared. (NCT01298570)
Timeframe: 28 days

,
InterventionAUC/dose=(ng/mL*h)/(mg/m^2) (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Arm A0.680.59
Arm B0.630.72

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Severe Adverse Events

Toxicity Assessments were made according to NCI CTCAE v. 4.0 . Severe events (grades 3-4) that occurred in a higher percentage of regorafenib treated participants as compared to placebo are reported below. (NCT01298570)
Timeframe: 3 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
neutropeniadiarrheahypophosphatemiahypertensionelevated lipase
Arm A41151488
Arm B305023

[back to top]

Number of Participants Alive and Free of Progression at 4 Months (Patients Who Have Undergone Prior Therapy) and 10 Months (Untreated Patients)

Clinical benefit rate is defined as the proportion of patients alive and free of progression at 4 Months (Patients Who Have Undergone Prior Therapy) and 10 Months (Untreated Patients), assessed from first treatment with GI-4000. Progression is defined as CR (complete response) = disappearance of all target lesions; PR (partial response) = 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesions; PD (progressive disease) = 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesions; or SD (stable disease) = small changes that do not meet the above criteria. (NCT01322815)
Timeframe: 4 Months for patients who had undergone prior 1st-line therapy, and 10 months for previously untreated patients

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Chemotherapy and GI-40004
GI-4000 and Bevacizumab2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Hematology)

Number of participants with NCI CTCAE (version 4.0) grade 1 to 4 hematological test abnormalities. Hematological tests included platelet count, hemoglobin, and white blood cell (WBC) count with 5- part differential. (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 1, 15, and 23 of Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, up to End of Treatment (within 28 days of last treatment administration)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipant (Number)
AnemiaHemoglobin IncreasedLymphocyte Count IncreasedLymphopeniaAbsolute NeutrophilsPlateletsWhite Blood Cells
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)5007345
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)6007323
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)1001000
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)1001000
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)5005133
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)6015001
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)3011000
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)3001020
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)7016012
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)5016130
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)2001111
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)3003013
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)6005213
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)310122181022
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)4003334
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)3003011
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)3001111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Coagulation)

Number of participants with NCI CTCAE (version 4.0) grade 1 to 4 coagulation test abnormalities. Coagulation tests included partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and prothrombin time (PT) international normalized ratio (INR). (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, up to End of Treatment (within 28 days of last treatment administration)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipant (Number)
PTT (N=5,1,1,7,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,4,7,7,3,4,2)PT INR (N=5,1,1,7,7,3,6,4,30,7,3,4,7,7,3,4,2)
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)22
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)55
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)00
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)01
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)21
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)20
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)31
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)21
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)23
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)52
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)20
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)20
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)01
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)2113
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)22
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)01
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)32

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Urinalysis)

Number of participants with NCI CTCAE (version 4.0) grade 1 to 4 urinalysis test abnormalities for urine protein. (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, up to End of Treatment (within 28 days of last treatment administration)

Interventionparticipant (Number)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)2
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)1
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)1
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)6
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)4
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)1
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)3
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)1
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)15
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)3
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)2
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)5
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)4
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)1
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)2
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)0

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm B

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours, and at Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)588.4
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)1001

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours, and at Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)474.5
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)933
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)688

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours post-dose.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)1479
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)2030
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)941

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours, and at Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)523.9
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)950
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)697

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours post-dose.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)1599
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)2140
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)1060

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Day 16 for Arm C

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 and Cycle 1 Day 16: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,
Interventionnanogram (ng)/milliliter (mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2 (N=2, 6, 4, 30)Cycle 1 Day 16 (N=3, 6, 4, 28)
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)NA2201
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)34042814
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)52215728
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)47594656

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease and all target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10 mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of the targeted lesions. (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8 weeks in Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, until progression of disease was documented.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)0
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)0
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)0
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)0
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)33.3
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)3.3
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)33.3
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)28.6
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)14.3
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in First Cycle (28 Days)

DLT was defined as any of the following hematologic or non-hematologic events which were attributable to the combination study drug and occurring in the first 28-day cycle: 1) Grade 4 neutropenia lasting greater than (>)7 days; 2) Febrile neutropenia (defined as neutropenia greater than or equal to [≥]Grade 3 and a body temperature ≥38.5°C); 3) Grade ≥3 neutropenic infection; 4) Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; 5) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia; 6) Grade ≥3 toxicities; 7) Persistent, intolerable toxicities which resulted in failure to deliver at least 75% of doses during the first cycle; 8) Persistent, intolerable toxicities which resulted in delay of start of Cycle 2 by more than 2 weeks of scheduled day; 9) Persistent Grade 3 QTc prolongation (QTc >500 msec) after correction of any reversible causes. (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 28 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)40.0
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)0
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)100
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)14.3
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)40.0
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)50.0
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)14.3
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)14.3
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)14.3
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)0
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)0

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Stage 2)

Progression-free survival (PFS) was the time from first dose to date of first documentation of progression or death due to any cause. (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8 weeks in Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, until progression of disease was documented.

Interventionmonths (Median)
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)2.8

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,,,,,
Interventionhr (Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -14 (N=5, 3, 3, 6, 6, 3, 4, 2)Cycle 1 Day 15 (N=3, 3, 4, 6, 3, 1, 3, 1)
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)24.6235.90
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)27.3739.30
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)30.7741.25
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)25.8534.43
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)29.3540.20
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)NA37.0
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)29.6337.0
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)27.0533.30

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Day 16 for Arm C

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 and Cycle 1 Day 16: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,
Interventionhour (hr) (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 2 (N=2, 6, 4, 30)Cycle 1 Day 16 (N=3, 6, 4, 28)
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)1.301.00
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)1.020.992
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)0.5000.525
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)0.9920.734

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,,,,,
Interventionhr (Median)
Cycle 0 Day -14 (N=7, 3, 4, 7, 6, 3, 4, 2)Cycle 1 Day 15 (N=5, 3, 4, 6, 5, 1, 4, 1)
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)0.5000.500
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)0.5000.500
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)0.5000.500
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)0.5000.509
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)0.5090.517
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)0.5000.500
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)1.000.667
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)0.5000.500

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm B

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose) and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours post-dose. Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6 8 and 24 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionhr (Median)
Cycle 0 Day -7 (N=7, 7)Cycle 1 Day 12 (N=7, 5)
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)22
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)1.072.03

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours, and at Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours.

,,
Interventionhr (Median)
Cycle 0 Day -7 (N=5, 1, 1)Cycle 1 Day 12 (N=4, 1, 1)
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)1.000.00
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)1.902.00
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)1.002.00

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours post-dose. Cycle 1 Day 12: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose.

,,
Interventionhr (Median)
Cycle 0 Day -7 (N=5, 1, 1)Cycle 1 Day 12 (N=4, 1, 1)
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)2.001.00
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)1.924.00
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)1.001.00

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -1 and Cycle 1 Day 1 for Arm D

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -1 and Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose.

,,,,,,,
Interventionhr (Median)
Cycle 0 Day -1 (N=7, 3, 3, 7, 7, 3, 3, 2)Cycle 1 Day 1 (N=5, 3, 3, 6, 6, 3, 4, 2)
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)1.001.00
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)2.002.00
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)1.031.00
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)1.972.00
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)1.071.00
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)2.501.00
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)1.002.00
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)2.001.50

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm B

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours, and at Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)705.0
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)1028

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half Life (t1/2) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm B

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours, and at Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours.

,
Interventionhr (Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -7 (N=6, 7)Cycle 1 Day 12 (N=3, 1)
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)13.138.597
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)13.068.97

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half Life (t1/2) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours, and at Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours.

,,
Interventionhr (Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -7 (N=5, 1, 1)Cycle 1 Day 12 (N=4, 0, 0)
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)12.4NA
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)11.5NA
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)9.3748.968

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Vital Signs Values Meeting Prespecified Criteria

Number of participants with vital signs values meeting prespecified criteria. Criteria defined as: 1) absolute systolic blood pressue (SBP) less than or equal to (<=) 100 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); 2) absolute SBP greater than or equal to (>=) 160 mmHg, 3) SBP maximum increase of >=20 mmHg from baseline; 4) SBP maximum increase of >=40 mmHg from baseline; 5) SBP maximum increase of >=60 mmHg from baseline; 6) absolute diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <=60 mmHg; 7) absolute DBP >=100 mmHg; 8) DBP maximum increase of >=10 mmHg from baseline; 9) DBP maximum increase of >=20 mmHg from baseline; 10) DBP maximum increase of >=30 mmHg from baseline; 11) absolute heart rate (HR) <50 beats per minute (bpm); 12) absolute HR >120 bpm. (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 1, 15, and 23 of Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, up to End of Treatment (within 28 days of last treatment administration)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Criterion 1 (N=5,1,1,7,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,4,7,7,3,4,2)Criterion 2 (N=5,1,1,7,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,4,7,7,3,4,2)Criterion 3 (N=5,1,1,6,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,3,7,4,3,4,1)Criterion 4 (N=5,1,1,6,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,3,7,4,3,4,1)Criterion 5 (N=5,1,1,6,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,3,7,4,3,4,1)Criterion 6 (N=5,1,1,7,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,4,7,7,3,4,2)Criterion 7 (N=5,1,1,7,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,4,7,7,3,4,2)Criterion 8 (N=5,1,1,6,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,3,7,4,3,4,1)Criterion 9 (N=5,1,1,6,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,3,7,4,3,4,1)Criterion10 (N=5,1,1,6,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,3,7,4,3,4,1)Criterion11 (N=5,1,1,7,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,4,7,7,3,4,2)Criterion12 (N=5,1,1,7,7,3,6,4,31,7,3,4,7,7,3,4,2)
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)400003141000
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)300003010000
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)000000000001
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)000000011000
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)111000030000
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)223201111101
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)201002011000
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)301001020000
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)133112031001
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)200003000010
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)200001010000
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)010001011000
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)100002000001
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)94711143101000
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)101001030000
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)000001010000
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)112111030000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs) by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) for AEs (CTCAE) (Version 4.0) Grade

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent AEs are events which occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs were graded by the NCI CTCAE (Version 4.0). (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline up to End of Treatment (EOT) (within 28 days after last treatment administration)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AEs, Grade 1Any AEs, Grade 2Any AEs, Grade 3Any AEs, Grade 4Any AEs, Grade 5Any AEs, Missing or UnknownAny AEs, Total
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)0520007
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)0250007
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)0010001
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)0010001
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)0221005
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)0231107
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)0210003
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)0211004
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)0320207
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)0241007
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)1010002
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)0300003
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)2400006
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)7101040031
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)0121004
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)0120003
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)1300004

[back to top]

Ratio to Baseline in Serum Glucose Level at Cycle 2 Day 16 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Days 2, 15, 22, and 23, Cycle 2 Days 1 and 16, Day 1 in Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, and EOT (within 28 days after last treatment administration)

Interventionratio (Mean)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)0.965
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)NA

[back to top]

Ratio to Baseline in Serum Insulin Level at Cycle 2 Day 16 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Days 2, 15, 22, and 23, Cycle 2 Days 1 and 16, Day 1 in Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, and EOT (within 28 days after last treatment administration)

Interventionratio (Mean)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)0.652
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)NA

[back to top]

Ratio to Baseline in Serum Insulin Level at End of Treatment for Arm B, Arm C, and Arm D

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Days 2, 15, 22, and 23, Cycle 2 Days 1 and 16, Day 1 in Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, and EOT (within 28 days after last treatment administration)

Interventionratio (Mean)
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)NA
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)1.628
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)2.178
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)1.699
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)2.233
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)NA

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours post-dose.

Interventionhr (Mean)
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)13.92
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)18.3
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)25.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline up to End of Treatment (EOT) (within 28 days after last treatment administration)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)72
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)75
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)11
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)11
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)52
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)73
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)31
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)42
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)74
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)71
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)20
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)30
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)60
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)315
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)42
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)30
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)41

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Cycle 1 Day 16 for Arm C

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 and Cycle 1 Day 16: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2 (N=1, 5, 3, 25)Cycle 1 Day 16 (N=1, 5, 3, 20)
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)75405870
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)79688627
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)1007010610
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)92779174

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,,,,,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -14 (N=7, 3, 4, 7, 6, 3, 4, 2)Cycle 1 Day 15 (N=5, 3, 4, 6, 5, 1, 4, 1)
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)762712070
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)1025012130
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)1485019970
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)1259013390
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)1428021170
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)NA20800
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)1384015200
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)961912610

[back to top]

Ratio to Baseline in Serum Glucose Level at End of Treatment for Arm B, Arm C, and Arm D

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Days 2, 15, 22, and 23, Cycle 2 Days 1 and 16, Day 1 in Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, and EOT (within 28 days after last treatment administration)

Interventionratio (Mean)
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)0.974
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)1.015
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)1.011
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)1.111
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)1.212
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)0.966
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)1.13
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)NA
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)NA

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Cycle 1 Day 16 for Arm C

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 and Cycle 1 Day 16: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2 (N=2, 6, 4, 30)Cycle 1 Day 16 (N=3, 6, 4, 28)
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)NA8819
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)74878243
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)948510890
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)1053011170

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -1 and Cycle 1 Day 1 for Arm D

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -1 and Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose.

,,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -1 (N=7, 3, 3, 7, 7, 3, 3, 2)Cycle 1 Day 1 (N=5, 3, 3, 6, 6, 3, 4, 2)
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)85.2891.69
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)63.8074.23
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)87.9964.99
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)180.6138.7
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)191.9183.6
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)NANA
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)115.8114.6
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)231.3211.9

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PD-0325901 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours post-dose. Cycle 1 Day 12: Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -7 (N=5, 1, 1)Cycle 1 Day 12 (N=4, 1, 1)
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)280690
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)101182
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)304.9341.9

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time (AUCinf) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,,,,,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -14 (N=5, 3, 3, 6, 6, 3, 4, 2)Cycle 1 Day 15 (N=3, 3, 4, 6, 3, 1, 3, 1)
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)635310430
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)1046012460
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)1488020440
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)1260013770
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)1462023730
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)NA21300
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)1423015500
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)976613320

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm B

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose) and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours post-dose. Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6 8 and 24 hours post-dose.

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -7 (N=7, 7)Cycle 1 Day 12 (N=7, 5)
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)41.4446.81
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)68.4187.30

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Maximum Post-dose QT Interval Corrected

Electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements (an average of the triplicate measurements) were used for the statistical analysis and all data presentations. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate (QTc) using Bazett's Formula (QTcB) and Fridericia's Formula (QTcF). (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 for Arms C and D, Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D, and Cycle 1 Day 16 for Arm C, Day 2 in Arm C and Day 1 in Arm D for subsequent cycles, up to End of Treatment (within 28 days of last treatment administration)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Maximum QTcB Interval <450 msecMaximum QTcB Interval 450 to <=480 msecMaximum QTcB Interval >480 to <=500 msecMaximum QTcB Interval >500 msecMaximum QTcF Interval <450 msecMaximum QTcF Interval 450 to <=480 msecMaximum QTcF Interval >480 to <=500 msecMaximum QTcF Interval >500 msec
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)43007000
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)34003400
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)00010001
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)10001000
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)23004100
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)25006100
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)30003000
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)31004000
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)25006100
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)41205200
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)10101010
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)21003000
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)42006000
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)2252224511
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)13002200
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)30003000
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)21012200

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -14 and Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -14 (N=7, 3, 4, 7, 6, 3, 4, 2)Cycle 1 Day 15 (N=5, 3, 4, 6, 5, 1, 4, 1)
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)36258621
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)59376153
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)1117012440
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)84768717
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)85868913
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)NA15400
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)62799280
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)72397989

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) for PF-05212384 on Cycle 1 Day 2 and Day 16 for Arm C

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 2 and Cycle 1 Day 16: Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours post-dose.

,,,
Interventionhr (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 2 (N=1, 5, 3, 25)Cycle 1 Day 16 (N=1, 5, 3, 20)
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)24.533.3
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)32.1437.98
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)32.1635.10
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)29.2334.50

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Expression of Genes Relating to Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase (PI3K), Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) and/or Wingless-Type Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus Integration Site Family Member (Wnt) Pathway Signaling

Number of participants with expression of genes relating to PI3K, MAPK and/or Wnt pathway signaling (kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog [KRAS] and PTEN protein). Biopsies were obtained at baseline and Cycle 1 Day 23. Biomarker evaluation was performed on these biopsies. (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Cycle 1 Day 23.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
KRAS mutationPTEN tumor manual scorePTEN stroma manual score
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)055
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)366
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)111
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)111
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)444
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)244
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)122
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)233
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)466
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)677
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)111
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)033
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)254
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)102424
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)144
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)222
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)122

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline in QT Interval

Electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements (an average of the triplicate measurements) were used for the statistical analysis and all data presentations. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate (QTc) using Bazett's Formula (QTcB) and Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) . (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 2 for Arms C and D, Cycle 1 Day 15 for Arm D, and Cycle 1 Day 16 for Arm C, Day 2 in Arm C and Day 1 in Arm D for subsequent cycles, up to End of Treatment (within 28 days of last treatment administration)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Maximum QTcB Interval Increase <30msecMaximumQTcB Interval Increase >=30to<60msecMaximum QTcB Interval Increase >=60 msecMaximum QTcF Interval Increase <30 msecMaximumQTcF Interval Increase >=30 to<60msecMaximum QTcF Interval Increase >=60 msec
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)700700
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)700520
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)010010
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)100100
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)410500
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)700610
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)210300
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)210210
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)610610
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)410500
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)200200
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)210210
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)510510
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)28202460
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)400310
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)300300
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)310400

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Chemistry)

Number of participants with NCI CTCAE (version 4.0) grade 1 to 4 chemistry test abnormalities. Chemistry tests included aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase [SGPT]), serum creatinine, total bilirubin, direct/indirect bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, chloride, uric acid, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or urea, total protein, albumin, glucose, and insulin. (NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Days 1, 15, and 23 of Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 2, Day 1 of Cycle 3 and subsequent cycles, up to End of Treatment (within 28 days of last treatment administration)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipant (Number)
ALTAlkaline phosphataseASTTotal bilirubincreatininehypercalcemiahyperglycemiahyperkalemiahypermagnesemiahypernatremiahypoalbuminemiahypocalcemiahypoglycemiahypokalemiahypomagnesemiahyponatremiahypophosphatemia
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B1 (Stage 1)25325062003402342
PF-04691502+Irinotecan: Arm B2 (Stage 1)36526061016413435
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)01001010001001011
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)11110010001101000
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)33405051013302214
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0 (Stage 1)34425051203213221
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0A (Stage 1)13202121002211121
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D0B (Stage 1)24323030004312221
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1 (Stage 1)56515071206103043
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D1A (Stage 1)46642072106424233
PF-05212384+ PD-0325901: Arm D2A (Stage 1)22202020102201110
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C1 (Stage 1)01003030000100200
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 1)33315051003010212
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C2 (Stage 2)132216321125222181331410148
PF-05212384+Irinotecan: Arm C3 (Stage 1)32213031113403131
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D1B (Stage 1)33313020003110110
PF-05212384+PD-0325901: Arm D2 (Stage 1)14314140012102211

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for PF-04691502 on Cycle 0 Day -7 and Cycle 1 Day 12 for Arm A

(NCT01347866)
Timeframe: Cycle 0 Day -7 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, and 72 hours, and at Cycle 1 Day 12 at 0 hours (pre-dose), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 0 Day -7 (N=5, 1, 1)Cycle 1 Day 12 (N=4, 1, 1)
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A2 (Stage1)59.821.2
PF-04691502+PF 0325901: Arm A4 (Stage1)48.764.7
PF-04691502+PF-0325901: Arm A1 (Stage1)38.0252.02

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Toxicity

(NCT01359007)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FOLFIRINOX2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01367275)
Timeframe: Enrollment (baseline) to disease progression or death, followed each 14 day treatment then every 2 months,up to 100 week

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Brivanib + Irinotecan7

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 20 percent (%) increase in sum of largest diameters (LD) of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 millimeters (mm). Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX610.09
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI12.55

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 High, VEGF-A Low)12.52
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High, VEGF-A Low)12.68

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 Low, VEGF-A Low)11.10
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low, VEGF-A Low)14.32

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels

Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 High)93.8
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)85.1

[back to top]

OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels

Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 High)22.54
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)26.51

[back to top]

OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)23.23
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)27.27

[back to top]

OS in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels

Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A High)22.83
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low)27.93

[back to top]

OS in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 Low)25.53
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)27.93

[back to top]

OS in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS

Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (KRAS Wild-Type)28.75
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (KRAS Mutant)24.64

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX623.85
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI27.47

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX611.9
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI5.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 High)17.6
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)6.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)4.6
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)6.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A High)3.2
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low)8.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 Low)8.9
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)3.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1

Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX693.1
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI91.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)89.3
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)93.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels

Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A High)91.9
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low)93.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 Low)92.7
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)95.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX614.9
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI10.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 High)17.6
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)6.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)4.6
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)9.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A High)5.9
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low)9.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 Low)10.5
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)7.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1

Objective response was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to less than (<) 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX661.2
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI65.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels

Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 High)56.3
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)65.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)61.1
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)64.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels

Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A High)60.5
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low)66.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 Low)63.7
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)65.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS

Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (KRAS Wild-Type)66.3
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (KRAS Mutant)60.9

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 High, VEGF-A High)8.80
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High, VEGF-A High)11.17

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 High)9.92
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)11.17

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 High)10.87
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)11.56

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A High)10.02
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (VEGF-A Low)12.68

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 Low, VEGF-A High)9.76
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low, VEGF-A High)11.07

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 (ERCC-1 Low)10.97
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI (ERCC-1 Low)12.68

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS

Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley. (NCT01374425)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (KRAS Wild-Type)12.45
Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX/FOLFIRI (KRAS Mutant)10.94

[back to top]

Determine Radiographic Response Rate of Patients Enrolled in the Phase 2a Portion of the Study

Percentage of participants who showed overall response during their participation in the study. Per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (mRECIST) and assessed by tri-phasic contrast enhanced CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of intratumoral enhancing area; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of enhancing area; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01394939)
Timeframe: Scans Every 8 weeks until radiographic progression was confirmed by the site.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single Agent_ Cohort 10
Single Agent_Cohort 20
Combination_Cohort 30
Combination_Cohort 41

[back to top]

Dose Escalation: To Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of the MM-121 Plus Cetuximab and the MM-121 Plus Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan Combination

To establish the safety of escalating doses of MM-121 in combination with cetuximab or in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan in order to determine the recommended phase 2 dose.. Dose-escalation conducted using standard 3+3 model to determine maximum tolerated dose. Reports of Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) were assessed to determine the MTD. (NCT01451632)
Timeframe: From date of first dose to 30 days after termination, the longest 48.1 weeks

Interventionparticipants reporting DLTs (Number)
Part 1: Cohort 11
Part 1: Cohort 2a0
Part 1: Cohort 2b0
Part 1: Cohort 3a0
Part 1: Cohort 3b0
Part 1: Cohort 40
Part 2: Cohort 11
Part 2: Cohort 22

[back to top]

Immunogenicity

Samples were collected to determine the presence of an immunologic reaction to MM-121 (i.e. human anti-human antibodies). (NCT01451632)
Timeframe: Samples were collected for all patients pre-dose on all cycles for duration of treatment, the longest of which was 48.1 weeks, and a collection was made post-infusion in any case of infusion reaction

Intervention (Number)
Part 1: Cohort 1NA
Part 1: Cohort 2aNA
Part 1: Cohort 2bNA
Part 1: Cohort 3aNA
Part 1: Cohort 3bNA
Part 1: Cohort 4NA
Part 1: Expansion CohortNA
Part 2: Cohort 1NA
Part 2: Cohort 2NA
Part 2: Expansion CohortNA

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameters of MM-121

Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation was performed on plasma samples obtained weekly for the first six weeks of the study and then on day 1 of each additional cycle to assess pre-treatment trough concentrations of MM-121. Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) was performed to calculate standard PK parameters, including the AUClast. Serum levels of MM-121 were measured at a central lab using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data is presented per dose level of MM-121 (12 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, or 40/20 mg/kg) and per study part (Part 1 or Part 2) (NCT01451632)
Timeframe: Collections taken for all patients at Cycle 1, Week 1 at pre-infusion, at the end of the infusion, and 2.5, 4, 6 and 24 hours after starting the infusion of MM-121

Interventionhr* ug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: 12 mg/kg24190.5
Part 1: 20 mg/kg53063.1
Part 1: 40/20 mg/kg91111.9
Part 2: 20 mg/kg47681.5
Part 2: 40/20 mg/kg98387.7

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

To determine the number of patients reporting an objective response using RECIST v 1.1 where a Partial Response (PR) is defined as >20% decrease in tumor burden from baseline and a Complete Response (CR) is defined as complete disappearance from tumor burden from baseline. Objective Response is presented as the total # patients with PR or CR. (NCT01451632)
Timeframe: Patients were assessed for objective response from time of first dose through treatment termination, the longest treatment duration being 48.1 weeks

Interventionparticipants with objective response (Number)
Part 1: Cohort 11
Part 1: Cohort 2a0
Part 1: Cohort 2b0
Part 1: Cohort 3a0
Part 1: Cohort 3b0
Part 1: Cohort 40
Part 1: Expansion Cohort1
Part 2: Cohort 11
Part 2: Cohort 20
Part 2: Expansion Cohort0

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation was performed on plasma samples obtained weekly for the first six weeks of the study and then on day 1 of each additional cycle to assess pre-treatment trough concentrations of MM-121. Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) was performed to calculate standard PK parameters, including the maximum observed concentration (Cmax). Serum levels of MM-121 were measured at a central lab using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data is presented per dose level of MM-121 (12 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, or 40/20 mg/kg) and per study part (Part 1 or Part 2) (NCT01451632)
Timeframe: Collections taken for all patients at Cycle 1, Week 1 at pre-infusion, at the end of the infusion, and 2.5, 4, 6 and 24 hours after starting the infusion of MM-121

Interventionug/mL (Geometric Mean)
Part 1: 12 mg/kg316.8
Part 1: 20 mg/kg611.0
Part 1: 40/20 mg/kg794.1
Part 2: 20 mg/kg505.8
Part 2: 40/20 mg/kg1278.2

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR), Response Rate (RR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR)

"by RECIST guideline Objective response rate = (Number of subjects with best overall response as confirmed CR or PR / Total number of subjects)*100.~Response rate = (Number of subjects with best overall response as CR or PR / Total number of subjects)*100.~Disease control rate = (Number of subjects with best overall response as confirmed CR or PR or SD / Total number of subjects)*100." (NCT01463982)
Timeframe: tumor response evaluation can continue to receive the study drug until PD confirmation

,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Objective Response rateResponse RateDisease Control Rate
Capecitabine 1000mg/㎡ + Oratecan 15mg/㎡33.333.350.0
Capecitabine 800mg/㎡ + Oratecan 10mg/㎡0.00.066.7
Capecitabine 800mg/㎡ + Oratecan 15mg/㎡0.00.042.9
Capecitabine 800mg/㎡ + Oratecan 20mg/㎡0.00.0100

[back to top]

Dose Limiting Toxicity Assessment and Maximum Tolerated Dose Determination

If Dose Limiting Toxicity(DLT) was not observed in the third subject at a dose level from the first study drug dosing date (Day 1) to the end of Cycle 1(21 days), increase the dose to the next level and enroll subjects; enrollment up to Level 4 was allowed. (NCI-CTCAE version 3.0) (NCT01463982)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (21 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Capecitabine 800mg/㎡ + Oratecan 10mg/㎡0.0
Capecitabine 800mg/㎡ + Oratecan 15mg/㎡0.0
Capecitabine 800mg/㎡ + Oratecan 20mg/㎡50.0
Capecitabine 1000mg/㎡ + Oratecan 15mg/㎡0.0

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

The PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest event time of: a) death regardless of cause, or b) first indication of disease progression. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. (NCT01479465)
Timeframe: Randomization up to 27 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRI + SIM 700 mg (Part A)5.7
FOLFIRI + Placebo (Part B)5.8
FOLFIRI + SIM 200 mg (Part B)5.4
FOLFIRI + SIM 700 mg (Part B)5.5

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (version 1.1) as Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), or Progressive Disease (PD). The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a CR or PR. (NCT01479465)
Timeframe: Randomization up to 27 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FOLFIRI + SIM 700 mg (Part A)9.1
FOLFIRI + Placebo (Part B)10.0
FOLFIRI + SIM 200 mg (Part B)5.9
FOLFIRI + SIM 700 mg (Part B)11.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The OS is measured as time from date of randomization to death regardless of cause. The OS was analyzed using KM estimates. (NCT01479465)
Timeframe: Randomization up to 33 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRI + SIM 700 mg (Part A)9.8
FOLFIRI + Placebo (Part B)16.3
FOLFIRI + SIM 200 mg (Part B)10.5
FOLFIRI + SIM 700 mg (Part B)11.4

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"ORR (complete response, unconfirmed complete response, partial response, unconfirmed partial response) in patients with measurable disease were assessed in each arm and compared between arms using Chi-squared test.~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after registration

Interventionpercentage of evaluable participants (Number)
Arm I42
Arm II30

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is the length of time between protocol registration and patient death (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I11.4
Arm II8.7

[back to top]

PFS in Low-ERCC1 Participants

Progression-free survival is the length of time between protocol registration and disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I5.9
Arm II2.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) in High-ERCC1 Patients

Progression-free survival is the length of time between protocol registration and disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years after registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I FOLFOX4.7
Arm II IT5.3

[back to top] [back to top]

PFS Variation by ERCC1

"Progression-free survival is the length of time between protocol registration and disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.~Participants were divided into subgroups according to ERCC1 quartiles to assess whether the differences in PFS between the two treatment arms varied by ERCC1 levels." (NCT01498289)
Timeframe: up to 3 years after registration

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Q1 ERCC1 (0.20-0.80)Q2 ERCC1 (0.81-1.10)Q3 ERCC1 (1.11-1.42)Q4 ERCC1 (1.43-5.71)
Arm I5.67.45.64.6
Arm II2.83.02.92.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

"To determine the safety and tolerability of TPI 287 in combination with Irinotecan and Temozolomide (TPI+I+TMZ) in pediatric and young adult patients with primary refractory or recurrent Neuroblastoma.~Phase I patients were all enrolled to receive TPI 287. Phase 2 is where randomization began. Patients were different patients than the Phase 1 patients. Below all patients that received TPI 287 are included in the TPI 287 group. This includes Phase I patients and the Phase 2 patients randomized to TPI 287." (NCT01505608)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
TPI 2877
Arm A- TMZ + Irinotecan Only0

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) of Participants Using Days Until Progression

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT01505608)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionDays (Number)
Arm A- Temozolomide and Irinotecan22
Arm B- Temozolomide/Irinotecan + TPI 287125

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Participants Using RECIST Criteria

"Phase I portion of trial- All patients enrolled to recieve TPI+I+TMZ. These patients will be added to the Phase II patients that were randomized to Arm B- Arm with TPI 287 (recieved same tx as Phase I participatns).~Phase II portion of trial- TPatients enrolled to this portion (different patients than enrolled to Phase 1) were randomized to Arm A: I+TMZ OR Arm B: TPI+I+TMZ Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT01505608)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm A- Temozolomide and Irinotecan0
Phase I Patients + Phase II Assigned Arm B- Tmz +I+ TPI 2872

[back to top]

Disease Free Survival (DFS)

Disease free survival (DFS) was defined as the time interval from the date of surgery to the date of disease recurrence or death or the date of a participant was last known to be alive without disease recurrence. (NCT01560949)
Timeframe: 54 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Phases11.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Local and Distant Failure

(NCT01560949)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Local recurrenceDistant recurrence
Surgery010

[back to top]

Number of Participants Correlative Studies Including DPC4 (SMAD4) Staining and Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) Pre-Surgery

Tumor tissue collected pre-therapy and post-therapy for surgically resected patients was assessed for SMAD4 status and classified as either present or absent based on immunohistochemistry evaluation. (NCT01560949)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PresentAbsent
Surgery42

[back to top]

Number of Participants Correlative Studies Including DPC4 (SMAD4) Staining and Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) Post-Surgery

Tumor tissue collected pre-therapy and post-therapy for surgically resected patients was assessed for SMAD4 status and classified as either present or absent based on immunohistochemistry evaluation. (NCT01560949)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PresentAbsent
Surgery47

[back to top]

Number of Participants That Were SMAD4 Positive Before and After Surgery

Tumor tissue collected pre-therapy and post-therapy for surgically resected patients was assessed for SMAD4 status and classified as either present or absent based on immunohistochemistry evaluation. (NCT01560949)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SMAD4 positive before surgerySMAD4 positive after surgery
Surgery44

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time interval from the date of diagnosis to the date of death due to any cause or the date a patient was last known to be alive. Estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01560949)
Timeframe: 54 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Phases(Systematic,Chemoradiation w/ Gemcitabine & Surgery)24

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Resectability Rate

Patients with borderline resectable treated with preoperative modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, followed by gemcitabine-based chemoradiation therapy. At least 4- 6 weeks after the last dose of gemcitabine if there is no local progression or distant metastasis, patients were scheduled for surgery. (NCT01560949)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Surgery15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With R0 Margin Resection

The specimen was designated R0 if no tumor cells were identified at any of the resection margins. (NCT01560949)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Surgery10

[back to top]

Association Between Longitudinal NLR (Longitudinal NLR ≤5 Versus NLR >5) and PFS as Assessed by Hazard Ratio

NLR was calculated from the laboratory values as the ratio of Neutrophils to Lymphocytes. Longitudinal NLR was assessed by treating the NLR measurements taken over the time-course of treatment as a time-dependent covariate. PFS was defined as time from the start of initial treatment to documentation of first disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was determined according to standard practice based on radiological, biochemical (CEA) or clinical factors. Determination of disease progression was to be unequivocal and was defined as: an unequivocal and clinically meaningful increase in size of known tumors, appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, elevated CEA accompanied by other radiological or clinical evidence of progression, or symptomatic deterioration. The association between longitudinal NLR (longitudinal NLR ≤5 vs N>5) and PFS was reported as hazard ratio. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionhazard ratio (Number)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B1.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete or Partial Response as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Phase B

Percentage of participants with best overall response of confirmed complete response or partial response based on the investigator assessment of the response as per routine clinical practice was reported. The confirmation of response must be no less than 4 weeks after initial assessment. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: From the start of Phase B treatment to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete responsePartial response
Bevacizumab: Phase B00

[back to top]

Association Between Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) [NLR ≤5 Versus NLR >5] and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Hazard Ratio

NLR was calculated from the laboratory values as the ratio of Neutrophils to Lymphocytes. PFS was defined as the time from the start of initial treatment to documentation of first disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was determined according to standard practice based on radiological, biochemical (carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]) or clinical factors. Determination of disease progression was to be unequivocal and was defined as any of the following: an unequivocal and clinically meaningful increase in the size of known tumors, the appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, elevated CEA accompanied by other radiological or clinical evidence of progression, or symptomatic deterioration. The association between NLR (NLR less than or equal to [≤] 5 vs greater than [>] 5) and PFS was reported as hazard ratio. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionhazard ratio (Number)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B1.4

[back to top]

Association Between NLR (NLR ≤5 Versus NLR >5) and OS as Assessed by Hazard Ratio

NLR was calculated from the laboratory values as the ratio of Neutrophils to Lymphocytes. OS was defined as the time from the start of initial treatment to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. The association between NLR (NLR ≤ 5 vs > 5) and OS was reported as hazard ratio. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionhazard ratio (Number)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B1.6

[back to top]

Association Between NLR Normalization (First NLR Post-Baseline ≤5 Versus NLR >5) and PFS as Assessed by Hazard Ratio

NLR was calculated from laboratory values as ratio of Neutrophils to Lymphocytes. NLR normalization was assessed by adding first post-baseline measurement of NLR to the primary model. This is equivalent to testing whether first change in NLR is significantly associated with outcome. PFS was defined as time from start of initial treatment to documentation of first disease progression or death from any cause. Disease progression was determined according to standard practice based on radiological, biochemical (CEA) or clinical factors. Determination of disease progression was defined as: an unequivocal and clinically meaningful increase in size of known tumors, appearance of ≥1 new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, elevated CEA accompanied by other radiological or clinical evidence of progression, or symptomatic deterioration.The association between NLR normalization (first NLR post-baseline ≤5 vs >5) and PFS was reported as hazard ratio. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionhazard ratio (Number)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B0.9

[back to top]

Duration of Disease Control (DDC) as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Overall

DDC was defined as PFS + PFS-B. In cases where a participant did not enter Phase B, then DDC was defined as PFS. PFS was defined as time from start of initial treatment to documentation of first disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS-B was time from start of Phase B treatment to documentation of second disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was determined according to standard practice based on radiological, biochemical (CEA) or clinical factors. Determination of disease progression was to be unequivocal and was defined as any of the following: an unequivocal and clinically meaningful increase in the size of known tumors, appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, elevated CEA accompanied by other radiological or clinical evidence of progression, or symptomatic deterioration. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate DDC. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B14.0

[back to top]

OS: Phase B

Overall Survival in Phase B was defined as the time from the start of treatment in Phase B to death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate OS. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: From the start of Phase B treatment death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab: Phase B14.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) From the Start of Treatment to Study Completion: Overall

OS was defined as the time from the start of initial treatment to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate OS. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline until death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B25.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Underwent Liver Resection: Overall

The results include percentage of participants who underwent potentially curative liver resection. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B1.6

[back to top]

PFS Until First Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Phase A

PFS until first progression was defined as the time from the start of initial treatment to documentation of first disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was determined according to standard practice based on radiological, biochemical (CEA) or clinical factors. Determination of disease progression was to be unequivocal and was defined as any of the following: an unequivocal and clinically meaningful increase in the size of known tumors, the appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, elevated CEA accompanied by other radiological or clinical evidence of progression, or symptomatic deterioration. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to first disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab: Phase A9.2

[back to top]

PFS Until Second Disease Progression as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Phase B

PFS in Phase B (PFS-B) was defined as the time from the start of Phase B treatment to documentation of second disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was determined according to standard practice based on radiological, biochemical (CEA) or clinical factors. Determination of disease progression was to be unequivocal and was defined as any of the following: an unequivocal and clinically meaningful increase in the size of known tumors, the appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, elevated CEA accompanied by other radiological or clinical evidence of progression, or symptomatic deterioration. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate PFS. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: From the start of Phase B treatment to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab: Phase B6.7

[back to top]

Survival Beyond First Disease Progression: Overall

Survival beyond first progression was defined as the time from the date of first disease progression to death due to any cause. Disease progression was determined according to standard practice based on radiological, biochemical (CEA) or clinical factors. Determination of disease progression was to be unequivocal and was defined as any of the following: an unequivocal and clinically meaningful increase in the size of known tumors, the appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, elevated CEA accompanied by other radiological or clinical evidence of progression, or symptomatic deterioration. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate survival beyond first disease progression. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline until death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B12.6

[back to top]

Time to Failure of Strategy (TFS): Overall

TFS was defined as time from the start of initial treatment to documentation of first disease progression without entering Phase B, or second disease progression having entered Phase B. Disease progression was determined according to standard practice based on radiological, biochemical (CEA) or clinical factors. Determination of disease progression was to be unequivocal and was defined as any of the following: an unequivocal and clinically meaningful increase in the size of known tumors, the appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, elevated CEA accompanied by other radiological or clinical evidence of progression, or symptomatic deterioration. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate TFS. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B14.8

[back to top]

AQoL-8D Global Utility Score: Phase B

AQoL-8D provides a global utility score and consists of 8 separately scored dimensions including Independent Living, Life Satisfaction, Mental Health, Coping, Relationships, Self Worth, Pain, and Senses. Each of the 8 scales is calculated based on the answers to 3 questions. Each question is given an answer dependent utility score (0 [worst] to 1 [best]) and then these scores are combined using a multiplicative model to get the normalized scale score value, each scale ranging between 0.0 (representing death) and 1.0 (representing full health). (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks thereafter, EOT (30 days after disease progression [up to 4 years]), survival follow-up 12-weekly visits (up to 4 years) [Detailed time points are presented in the category titles]

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Phase B BaselinePhase B Visit 2 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 3 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 4 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 5 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 6 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 7 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 8 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 9 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 10 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 11 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 12 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 13 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 14 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 15 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 16 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 17 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 18 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 19 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 20 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 21 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 22 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 23 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 24 (up to 4 years)Phase B EOT Visit (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 1 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 2 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 3 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 4 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 6 (up to 4 years)
Bevacizumab: Phase B0.7360.7730.8130.8780.8080.8090.8250.9100.8190.8560.7300.9600.9650.9580.9670.9420.9270.9310.8660.8870.9400.9190.9370.9500.7080.7880.7910.9890.9810.875

[back to top]

Assessment of Quality of Life - Eight Dimensions (AQoL-8D) Global Utility Score: Phase A

AQoL-8D provides a global utility score and comprised of 35 questions from which 8 dimensions (Independent Living, Life Satisfaction, Mental Health, Coping, Relationships, Self Worth, Pain, and Senses) are derived. Each of the 8 scales is calculated based on the answers to 3 questions. Each question is given an answer dependent utility score (0 [worst] to 1 [best]) and then these scores are combined using a multiplicative model to get the normalized scale score value, each scale ranging between 0.0 (representing death) and 1.0 (representing full health). (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks thereafter, EOT (30 days after disease progression [up to 4 years]), survival follow-up 12-weekly visits (up to 4 years) [Detailed time points are presented in the category titles]

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Phase A BaselinePhase A Visit 2 (Weeks 8-9)Phase A Visit 3 (Weeks 16-17)Phase A Visit 4 (Weeks 24-25)Phase A Visit 5 (Weeks 32-33)Phase A Visit 6 (Weeks 40-41)Phase A Visit 7 (Weeks 48-49)Phase A Visit 8 (Weeks 56-57)Phase A Visit 9 (Weeks 64-65)Phase A Visit 10 (Weeks 72-73)Phase A Visit 11 (Weeks 80-81)Phase A Visit 12 (Weeks 88-89)Phase A Visit 13 (Weeks 96-97)Phase A Visit 14 (Weeks 104-105)Phase A Visit 15 (Weeks 112-113)Phase A Visit 16 (Weeks 120-121)Phase A Visit 17 (Weeks 128-129)Phase A Visit 18 (Weeks 136-137)Phase A Visit 19 (Weeks 144-145)Phase A Visit 20 (Weeks 152-153)Phase A Visit 21 (Weeks 160-161)Phase A Visit 22 (Weeks 168-169)Phase A Visit 23 (Weeks 176-177)Phase A EOT Visit (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 1 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 2 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 3 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 4 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 5 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 6 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 7 (up to 4 years)
Bevacizumab: Phase A0.7470.7600.7670.7960.8000.8310.8180.8510.8220.8270.8390.8560.8310.8150.8710.8690.8590.8800.9150.8640.8060.8110.7090.7390.7180.7920.6960.6200.8000.8100.874

[back to top]

European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EuroQol-5D) Utility Score: Phase A

"EQ-5D is a standardized generic preference based health related quality of life instrument. It records how one's health is today and consists of a descriptive system. The descriptive system is comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension on the EQ-5D involves a 3-point response scale which indicates the level of impairment (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem[s] and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Level of problem reported in each EQ-5D dimension determines a unique health state which is converted into a weighted health state index by applying scores from EQ-5D preference weights elicited from general population samples. This generates a unique description of the subjects' health status, which is valued between 0 (representing death) and 1 (representing perfect health). Higher the score, the better the quality of life." (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks thereafter, end of treatment (EOT) (30 days after disease progression [up to 4 years]), survival follow-up 12-weekly visits (up to 4 years) [Detailed time points are presented in the category titles]

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Phase A BaselinePhase A Visit 2 (Weeks 8-9)Phase A Visit 3 (Weeks 16-17)Phase A Visit 4 (Weeks 24-25)Phase A Visit 5 (Weeks 32-33)Phase A Visit 6 (Weeks 40-41)Phase A Visit 7 (Weeks 48-49)Phase A Visit 8 (Weeks 56-57)Phase A Visit 9 (Weeks 64-65)Phase A Visit 10 (Weeks 72-73)Phase A Visit 11 (Weeks 80-81)Phase A Visit 12 (Weeks 88-89)Phase A Visit 13 (Weeks 96-97)Phase A Visit 14 (Weeks 104-105)Phase A Visit 15 (Weeks 112-113)Phase A Visit 16 (Weeks 120-121)Phase A Visit 17 (Weeks 128-129)Phase A Visit 18 (Weeks 136-137)Phase A Visit 19 (Weeks 144-145)Phase A Visit 20 (Weeks 152-153)Phase A Visit 21 (Weeks 160-161)Phase A Visit 22 (Weeks 168-169)Phase A Visit 23 (Weeks 176-177)Phase A EOT Visit (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 1 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 2 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 3 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 4 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 5 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 6 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 7 (up to 4 years)
Bevacizumab: Phase A0.8300.8570.8650.8530.8690.8920.8720.8810.8940.8430.8980.9150.8440.8990.8780.8990.8730.9090.9470.8520.9330.8130.9000.8170.7680.9010.8190.8431.0000.8350.816

[back to top]

Association Between Longitudinal NLR (Longitudinal NLR ≤5 Versus NLR >5) and OS as Assessed by Hazard Ratio

NLR was calculated from the laboratory values as the ratio of Neutrophils to Lymphocytes. Longitudinal NLR was assessed by treating the NLR measurements taken over the time-course of treatment as a time-dependent covariate. OS was defined as the time from the start of initial treatment to the date of death, regardless of the cause of death. The association between longitudinal NLR (longitudinal NLR ≤5 vs NLR >5) and OS was reported as hazard ratio. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionhazard ratio (Number)
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B2.2

[back to top]

FACT-C Score: Phase B

FACT-C is one part of the FACIT Measurement System, which comprehensively assesses the health-related QoL of cancer participants and participants with other chronic illnesses. It is composed of 27 items of the general version of the FACT-C as a general core QoL measure and has a disease-specific subscale containing 9 colorectal cancer-specific items. It consists of total 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical well-being (7 items), functional well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items); all 3 subscales range from 0 to 28, emotional well-being (6 items) range from 0 to 24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range from 0 to 36; higher subscale score=better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score range: 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks thereafter, EOT (30 days after disease progression [up to 4 years]), survival follow-up 12-weekly visits (up to 4 years) [Detailed time points are presented in the category titles]

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Phase B BaselinePhase B Visit 2 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 3 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 4 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 5 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 6 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 7 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 8 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 9 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 10 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 11 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 12 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 13 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 14 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 15 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 16 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 17 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 18 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 19 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 20 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 21 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 22 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 23 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 24 (up to 4 years)Phase B EOT Visit (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 1 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 2 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 3 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 4 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 6 (up to 4 years)
Bevacizumab: Phase B103.47108.71108.19114.89110.60111.28114.78120.39108.08110.50109.33125.00119.00117.00126.00123.00127.00126.00127.00126.00123.00124.00126.00130.00101.6798.72102.50126.33125.00124.67

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) Score: Phase A

FACT-C is one part of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System, which comprehensively assesses the health-related QoL of cancer participants and participants with other chronic illnesses. It is composed of 27 items of the general version of the FACT-C as a general core QoL measure and has a disease-specific subscale containing 9 colorectal cancer-specific items. It consists of total 36 items, summarized to 5 subscales: physical well-being (7 items), functional well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items); all 3 subscales range from 0 to 28, emotional well-being (6 items) range from 0 to 24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range from 0 to 36; higher subscale score=better QoL. All single-item measures range from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much'. Total possible score range: 0 to 144. High scale score represents a better QoL. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks thereafter, EOT (30 days after disease progression [up to 4 years]), survival follow-up 12-weekly visits (up to 4 years) [Detailed time points are presented in the category titles]

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Phase A BaselinePhase A Visit 2 (Weeks 8-9)Phase A Visit 3 (Weeks 16-17)Phase A Visit 4 (Weeks 24-25)Phase A Visit 5 (Weeks 32-33)Phase A Visit 6 (Weeks 40-41)Phase A Visit 7 (Weeks 48-49)Phase A Visit 8 (Weeks 56-57)Phase A Visit 9 (Weeks 64-65)Phase A Visit 10 (Weeks 72-73)Phase A Visit 11 (Weeks 80-81)Phase A Visit 12 (Weeks 88-89)Phase A Visit 13 (Weeks 96-97)Phase A Visit 14 (Weeks 104-105)Phase A Visit 15 (Weeks 112-113)Phase A Visit 16 (Weeks 120-121)Phase A Visit 17 (Weeks 128-129)Phase A Visit 18 (Weeks 136-137)Phase A Visit 19 (Weeks 144-145)Phase A Visit 20 (Weeks 152-153)Phase A Visit 21 (Weeks 160-161)Phase A Visit 22 (Weeks 168-169)Phase A Visit 23 (Weeks 176-177)Phase A EOT Visit (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 1 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 2 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 3 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 4 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 5 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 6 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 7 (up to 4 years)
Bevacizumab: Phase A103.84103.33106.34109.66109.39111.30111.40113.51113.92115.11114.00115.99113.54112.36119.48116.38113.69112.94117.55115.86106.00112.00105.00103.94102.89104.00105.50109.00119.00103.61115.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete or Partial Response as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Overall

Percentage of participants with best overall response of confirmed complete response or partial response based on the investigator assessment of the response as per routine clinical practice was reported. The confirmation of response must be no less than 4 weeks after initial assessment. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete responsePartial response
Bevacizumab: Phase A and Phase B3.18.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete or Partial Response as Assessed by the Investigator Based on Routine Clinical Practice: Phase A

Percentage of participants with best overall response of confirmed complete response or partial response based on the investigator assessment of the response as per routine clinical practice was reported. The confirmation of response must be no less than 4 weeks after initial assessment. (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline up to disease progression, death or end of study (up to 4 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete responsePartial response
Bevacizumab: Phase A3.18.6

[back to top]

EuroQol-5D Utility Score: Phase B

"EQ-5D is a standardized generic preference based health related quality of life instrument. It records how one's health is today and consists of a descriptive system. The descriptive system is comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension on the EQ-5D involves a 3-point response scale which indicates the level of impairment (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem[s] and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Level of problem reported in each EQ-5D dimension determines a unique health state which is converted into a weighted health state index by applying scores from EQ-5D preference weights elicited from general population samples. This generates a unique description of the subjects' health status, which is valued between 0 (representing death) and 1 (representing perfect health). Higher the score, the better the quality of life." (NCT01588990)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks thereafter, EOT (30 days after disease progression [up to 4 years]), survival follow-up 12-weekly visits (up to 4 years) [Detailed time points are presented in the category titles]

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Phase B BaselinePhase B Visit 2 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 3 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 4 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 5 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 6 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 7 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 8 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 9 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 10 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 11 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 12 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 13 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 14 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 15 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 16 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 17 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 18 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 19 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 20 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 21 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 22 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 23 (up to 4 years)Phase B Visit 24 (up to 4 years)Phase B EOT Visit (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 1 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 2 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 3 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 4 (up to 4 years)Survival Follow-Up 6 (up to 4 years)
Bevacizumab: Phase B0.8140.8590.8940.8970.8660.8370.8760.8740.9080.8110.8060.8441.0001.0000.8440.8330.8440.8330.8270.8160.8440.8440.8270.8440.8090.7400.7720.8270.8271.000

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival

The median progression free survival as measured from the start of treatment until the time of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. Disease status was evaluated using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Disease progression is defined as having at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesion, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT01591733)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until death or disease progression, median duration of follow-up of 14.7 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
FOLFIRINOX + Radiation14.7

[back to top]

30 Day Post-operative Mortality Rate

The number of participants that died within 30 days after undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. (NCT01591733)
Timeframe: 30 days post surgery (about 6 months from baseline)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FOLFIRINOX + Radiation0

[back to top]

Local Control Rates

The number of participants that achieved local control. Local control was evaluated using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Local Failure is defined as progression of the primary tumor, or to the reappearance of tumor at the primary site. (NCT01591733)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until the end of treatment with FOLFIRINOX, or until disease progression (median duration of follow-up of approximately 14 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FOLFIRINOX + Radiation32

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

Median overall survival, as measured from the start of treatment until the time of death. (NCT01591733)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until the time of death, median duration of follow-up of 37.7 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
FOLFIRINOX + Radiation37.7

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Rate of R0 Resection

The rate of R0 resection of patients with borderline-resectable adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas, along with borderline-resectable and resectable adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. R0 resection means that following surgery, no cancer cells are seen microscopically at the resection margin. (NCT01591733)
Timeframe: Post-surgery (about 4 months post baseline)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Eligible - FOLFIRINOX + Radiation31
Resected Participants - FOLFIRINOX + Radiation31

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma

The MTD was the highest dose level tested at which fewer than two of six patients had first course DLT. Hematologic DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia for more than 7 days, need for platelet transfusion for a platelet count of less than 20,000/mL twice within a 7-day period, or greater than 14-day delay in the start of a subsequent course because of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic DLT was defined as any nonhematologic toxicity that delayed the start of a subsequent cycle by more than 14 days or any grade ≥3 toxicity with the exception of the following grade 3 toxicities: nausea, vomiting, anorexia, or dehydration resolving to grade ≤ 2 within 72 hours; increase in hepatic transaminase or electrolyte abnormality resolving to grade ≤ 1 within 7 days; diarrhea persisting for less than 72 hours; fever; infection; or febrile neutropenia. DLT definitions included only toxicities deemed at least possibly related to therapy. (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: 21 days, from study day 1

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase I60

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Alisertib AUC

Outcomes included Alisertib, irinotecan, APC, SN-38, and SN-38G. APC, SN-38, and SN-38G are metabolites of irinotecan. (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: 1st week of cycle 1

InterventionµM•hour (Median)
DL 128.15
DL 1B21
DL 2B30.71
DL 3B47.73
Oral Solution58.15

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Irinotecan Clearance

Outcomes included Alisertib, irinotecan, APC, SN-38, and SN-38G. APC, SN-38, and SN-38G are metabolites of irinotecan. (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: 1st week of cycle 1

InterventionL/h (Median)
DL 114.0
DL 1B15.7
DL 2B10.4
DL 3B16.0
Ph 212.6
Oral Solution10.3

[back to top]

AURKA Genotype

To explore whether AURKA genotype is associated with antitumor activity in children with refractory neuroblastoma treated with the combination of MLN8237, irinotecan, and temozolomide. (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: Day 7 of cycle 1

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AurkA Codon 31 Summary HAurkA Codon 31 Summary VAurkA Codon 31 Summary WAurkA Codon 31 Summary MissingAurkA Codon 57 Summary HAurkA Codon 57 Summary WAurkA Codon 57 Summary Missing
Objective Non-Responders912210102210
Objective Responders3054354

[back to top]

Aurora A Expression

To explore whether MYCN status and markers of expression of Aurora A in archival tumor tissue are associated with the antitumor activity of the combination of MLN8237, irinotecan, and temozolomide (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: From date of study enrollment to the date of progression or withdrawal from the study, up to 34 cycles (about 2 years).

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MYCN AmplifiedMYCN not AmplifiedMYCN MissingMYCN Amplified or Myc PositiveMYCN Non-amplified and Myc NegativeMYCN or Myc MissingAurora A protein PositiveAurora A protein NegativeAurora A protein Missing
Objective Non-Responders14244161115101418
Objective Responders192255246

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Alisertib Day 4 Trough, Day 5 Trough and Cmax

Outcomes included Alisertib, irinotecan, APC, SN-38, and SN-38G. APC, SN-38, and SN-38G are metabolites of irinotecan. (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: 1st week of cycle 1

,,,,
InterventionµM (Median)
Alisertib Day 4 troughAlisertib Day 5 troughAlisertib Cmax
DL 10.480.372.56
DL 1B0.350.362.39
DL 2B0.30.23.77
DL 3B0.730.694.94
Oral Solution0.470.588.66

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Alisertib Tmax and Half-life

Outcomes included Alisertib, irinotecan, APC, SN-38, and SN-38G. APC, SN-38, and SN-38G are metabolites of irinotecan. (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: 1st week of cycle 1

,,,,
Interventionhour (Median)
Alisertib TmaxAlisertib Half-life
DL 12.047.20
DL 1B1.748.61
DL 2B2.56.19
DL 3B2.528.54
Oral Solution28.34

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Irinotecan AUC, APC AUC, SN-38 AUC, and SN-38G AUC

Outcomes included Alisertib, irinotecan, APC, SN-38, and SN-38G. APC, SN-38, and SN-38G are metabolites of irinotecan. (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: 1st week of cycle 1

,,,,,
Interventionh·ng/mL (Median)
Irinotecan AUCAPC AUCSN-38 AUCSN-38G AUC
DL 13,70257163.2206.5
DL 1B2,68047752.997.6
DL 2B3,95751180.8141.8
DL 3B2,61541872.0134.4
Oral Solution3,12161656.7136
Ph 23,53351190.0132

[back to top]

One Year Progression Free Survival Rate

To determine the progression free survival rates for patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma treated with MLN8237, irinotecan, and temozolomide at the identified MTD (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: 1 Years after completion of study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ph 24

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics When Given Together With Fixed Doses of Irinotecan and Temozolomide in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma: Irinotecan Cmax, APC Cmax, SN-38 Cmax, and SN-38G Cmax

Outcomes included Alisertib, irinotecan, APC, SN-38, and SN-38G. APC, SN-38, and SN-38G are metabolites of irinotecan. (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: 1st week of cycle 1

,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Median)
Irinotecan CmaxAPC CmaxSN-38 CmaxSN-38G Cmax
DL 172261.29.518.2
DL 1B70359.812.616.9
DL 2B1,23855.812.013.8
DL 3B78443.411.713.0
Oral Solution73251.48.2615.2
Ph 288157.110.412.8

[back to top]

Response Rate for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma Treated With MLN8237, Irinotecan, and Temozolomide at the Identified MTD

Response was graded according to version 1.2 of the NANT response criteria that classifies patients as having one of the following overall response categories based upon underlying response at soft tissue sites, MIBG positive sites, and bone marrow disease: complete response (CR); CR with minimal residual disease (CR-MRD); partial response (PR); minor response (MR); stable disease (SD); and progressive disease (PD). These criteria utilize RECIST criteria for measurable tumors, Curie score for MIBG scan response, and bone marrow (BM) morphology. BM response was graded as CR (required two time points to confirm), CR unconfirmed (one time point only), CR-MRD (bone marrow involvement < 5% at study entry with negative follow-up biopsies), SD, or PD. Patients with at least SD or better underwent central review of MIBG scans, CT scans, and bone marrow pathology slides. Overall responses of CR, CR-MRD, or PR were considered objective responses. (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: Cycles repeated every 21 days for up to 34 cycles.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response (CR)CR-Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)Partial Response (PR)Minor ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseResponse Rate (CR + CR-MRD + PR)
Ph 20042854

[back to top] [back to top]

UGT1A1 Genotype

To explore whether UGT1A1 genotype is associated with toxicity in children with refractory neuroblastoma treated with the combination of MLN8237, irinotecan, and temozolomide (NCT01601535)
Timeframe: Day 7 of cycle 1

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
UGT1A1 66UGT1A1 67UGT1A1 77UGT1A1 Missing
DLT in Any Cycle No91116
DLT in Any Cycle Yes8649
First Cycle DLT No1514212
First Cycle DLT Yes2333

[back to top]

Tumor Response

Change in tumor size will be measured by CT scan using RECIST criteria. (NCT01607554)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Irinotecan2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 1

Dose-normalized Cmax was calculated from Cmax divided by the dose. Data presented are Geo LS means. Geo LS means were adjusted for cycle, participant and random error. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: 0, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post-irinotecan infusion

Interventionnanograms/milliliter/milligram (Least Squares Mean)
IrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
FOLFIRI (Cycle 1)3.180.05

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies (TE-ADA)

Number of participants with positive treatment emergent anti-ramucirumab antibodies was summarized by treatment group. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Up To 2 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI (Cycle 2)0

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Cmax of Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B)

(NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 2: -2, -1, -0.5, 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 25, 48, 72, 96, 168, 264, 336 hours post-ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) infusion

Interventionmicrograms/milliliter (µg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI (Cycle 2)201.6

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 From Time Zero to Infinity [AUC(0-∞)] in Cycle 1

Dose-normalized AUC(0-∞) was calculated from AUC(0-∞) divided by the dose. Data presented are Geometric Least Squares (Geo LS) means. Geo LS means were adjusted for cycle, participant and random error. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: 0, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post-irinotecan infusion

Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter/milligram (Least Squares Mean)
IrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
FOLFIRI (Cycle 1)22.120.81

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized AUC(0-∞) of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 2

Dose-normalized AUC(0-∞) was calculated from AUC(0-∞) divided by the dose. Data presented are Geo LS means. Geo LS means were adjusted for cycle, participant and random error. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 2: 0, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post-irinotecan infusion

Interventionnanograms*hour/milliliter/milligram (Least Squares Mean)
IrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI (Cycle 2)20.560.77

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics: Dose-Normalized Cmax of Irinotecan and Its Metabolite SN-38 in Cycle 2

Dose-normalized Cmax was calculated from Cmax divided by the dose. Data presented are Geo LS means. Geo LS means were adjusted for cycle, participant and random error. (NCT01634555)
Timeframe: Cycle 2: 0, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 48, 72, 96 and 168 hours post-irinotecan infusion

Interventionnanograms/milliliter/milligram (Least Squares Mean)
IrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
Ramucirumab + FOLFIRI (Cycle 2)3.310.05

[back to top]

Percentage Able to Complete Full Course of Therapy

The percentage of participants able to complete the full course of therapy, including preoperative chemotherapy, surgical resection and postoperative chemotherapy. (NCT01660711)
Timeframe: On completion of all planned therapy, an expected average of 8 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy14

[back to top]

Percentage Able to Complete Full Course of Preoperative Chemotherapy

The percentage of participants able to complete the full course of preoperative chemotherapy and undergo a resection. This will be the primary determinant of success for this pilot study. - Early withdrawals due to toxicity, disease progression, or intercurrent illness will be considered failures. (NCT01660711)
Timeframe: Following completion of all planned therapy, an expected average of 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy22

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that developed or worsened or became serious during on-treatment period. On-treatment period was defined as the time from the first dose of treatment to 30 days after the last dose of treatment (either Aflibercept or FOLFIRI). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs. (NCT01670721)
Timeframe: Baseline upto 30 days after the last treatment administration (either Aflibercept or FOLFIRI whichever comes last) (maximum exposure:723 days)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Any TEAEAny serious TEAEAny serious related TEAEAny TEAE leading to deathAny TEAE (permanent treatment discontinuation)Any TEAE (premature treatment discontinuation)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI (Irinotecan, 5-FU & Leucovorin)100.0040.621.19.123.416.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HRQL EQ-5D-3L VAS Score

EQ-5D VAS was used to record a participant's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state. Baseline corresponded to last evaluable assessment before treatment administration. (NCT01670721)
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Baseline, Day 1 of every odd cycle; and at end of treatment (30 days after last study treatment) (maximum exposure: 99 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=125)At cycle 3 (n=94)At cycle 5 (n=76)At cycle 7 (n=57)At cycle 9 (n=38)At cycle 11 (n=36)At cycle 13 (n=22)At cycle 15 (n=22)At cycle 17 (n=13)At cycle 19 (n=10)At cycle 21 (n=8)At cycle 23 (n=5)At cycle 25 (n=2)At cycle 27 (n=3)At cycle 29 (n=2)At cycle 31 (n=1)At cycle 37 (n=1)At cycle 39 (n=1)At cycle 41 (n=1)At cycle 43 (n=1)At cycle 45 (n=1)At end of study treatment (n=55)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI (Irinotecan, 5-FU & Leucovorin)69.48-6.23-7.62-7.79-7.55-8.67-8.95-12.41-10.31-15.70-15.13-8.80-13.00-15.67-17.50-15.00-15.00-15.00-15.00-15.00-15.00-13.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in HRQL European-Quality of Life-5 Dimension Instrument-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score

EQ-5D was a standardized HRQL questionnaire consisting of EQ-5D descriptive system and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression measured on 3 levels (no problem, some problems & severe problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. 5 dimensional 3-level system was converted into single index utility score. Possible values for single index utility score ranged from -0.594 (severe problems in all dimensions) to 1.0 (no problem in all dimensions) on scale where 1 represented best possible health state. (NCT01670721)
Timeframe: Pre-dose at Baseline, Day 1 of every odd cycle; and at end of treatment (30 days after last study treatment) (maximum exposure: 99 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n=148)At Cycle 3 (n=127)At Cycle 5 (n=96)At Cycle 7 (n=72)At Cycle 9 (n=49)At Cycle 11 (n=43)At Cycle 13 (n=24)At Cycle 15 (n=25)At Cycle 17 (n=14)At Cycle 19 (n=12)At Cycle 21 (n=10)At Cycle 23 (n=6)At Cycle 25 (n=3)At Cycle 27 (n=3)At Cycle 29 (n=2)At Cycle 31 (n=1)At Cycle 37 (n=1)At Cycle 39 (n=1)At Cycle 41 (n=1)At Cycle 43 (n=1)At Cycle 45 (n=1)At end of study treatment (n=71)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI (Irinotecan, 5-FU & Leucovorin)0.78-0.04-0.08-0.05-0.09-0.06-0.09-0.10-0.03-0.10-0.03-0.080.04-0.09-0.180.00-0.150.000.000.000.00-0.20

[back to top] [back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of ISIS 183750 in Advanced Solid Tumors

MTD is the dose level at which no more than 1 of up to 6 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 6 weeks of treatment, and no dose below that which at least 2 (of NCT01675128)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmg (Number)
All Phase I Participants1000

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from the on study date until the date of death or date last known alive. (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: ≥ 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I Dose Level II1
Phase II Dose Level I1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Intracellular and Stromal Presence of ISIS in Tumor Tissue

Intracellular and stromal presence of ISIS in tumor tissue was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Crystal Violet staining to determine effectiveness of drug. Tissue that retains stain indicates intracellular and stromal presence of ISIS and determines if the drug is working. Relative staining intensity (intensity criteria unavailable) was evaluated by a pathologist. (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II Dose Level I10

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Reduced Effect of elF4E Inhibition on Relevant Regulated Proteins

Protein levels in the biopsy sample was assessed by immunohistochemistry using anti-oligonucleotide antibody to assess the downstream effect and determine if proteins are being manufactured. The number of participants with a reduced effect (criteria unavailable) of elF4E inhibition on relevant regulated proteins determines if the drug is working. (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II Dose Level I10

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Change in the Level of a Particular Gene Called elF4E [Eukaryotic Initiation Factors (elF)4e Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Levels] in Matched Pre and Post Tumor Biopsies

A change in elF4e levels is defined as an increase or decrease compared to baseline and is measured between two time points before rand after 2 weeks of treatment by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II Dose Level I5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Change in elF4e Protein Levels in Matched Pre and Post Tumor Biopsies

A change in protein is defined as an increase or decrease compared to baseline and is measured between two time points by immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II Dose Level I5

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Irinotecan in Advanced Solid Tumors

MTD is the dose level at which no more than 1 of up to 6 patients experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 6 weeks of treatment, and no dose below that which at least 2 (of NCT01675128)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
All Phase I Participants160

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Decrease in elF4E mRNA Expression in Peripheral Blood

Peripheral blood analysis of elF4E mRNA expression was performed using real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) to assess the downstream effect and determine if proteins are being manufactured. The number of participants with a decrease (criteria unavailable) in elF4E determines if the drug is working. Cell proliferation or reduction was evaluated by a pathologist. (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II Dose Level I10

[back to top]

Objective Response

Objective response was evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete Response (CR) is the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non target) must have reduction in short axis to <10mm. Partial response (PR) is at least a 30% reduction in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of athe diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more lesions is also considered progression). (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: up to 2 cycles

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive (PD)
Phase I Dose Level 20033
Phase II Dose Level I0045

[back to top]

AUC(ALL) (Area Under the Plasma Concentration vs. Time Curve for All Time Points)

AUC(ALL) (Area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve for all time points) was assessed for CPT-11 (irinotecan), its active metabolite SN38, and the glucuronic acid metabolite of SN38, SN38-G to derive the total AUC(ALL). (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours post end of infusion

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
CPT-11 (irinotecan)SN38SN38-G
Phase I Dose Level I & Phase I Dose Level II90161191340

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival is defined as the time beginning on the on study date and continuing until date of progression or date removed from study for an adverse event. (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: ≤ 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I Dose Level II3
Phase II Dose Level I6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For a detailed list of adverse events, see the adverse event module. (NCT01675128)
Timeframe: 21 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I Dose Level I4
Phase I Dose Level II10
Phase II Dose Level I10

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Disease control rate will be measured by the percentage of patients with responses (CR) and partial responses (PR) and stable disease (SD), per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI and/or CT: Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progression of Disease (POD); Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT01688336)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
FOLFIRINOX89

[back to top]

Overall Survival for Borderline Resectable Patients

All patients who receive at least Day 1 of FOLFIRINOX treatment will be evaluable and followed up for up to 3 years for the outcome of overall survival (OS) (NCT01688336)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
FOLFIRINOX9.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

"All patients who have received at least one cycle of treatment will be evaluated. Disease will be evaluated per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT and/or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.~Patients who drop out of the study prior to disease evaluation will not be evaluable for response unless the patient undergoes radiologic evaluation or their disease progresses clinically." (NCT01688336)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
FOLFIRINOX11

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS) of FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced (ULA) Pancreatic Cancer

All patients who receive at least Day 1 of FOLFIRINOX treatment will be evaluable and followed up for up to 3 years for the primary outcome of overall survival (OS). (NCT01688336)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRINOX28.5

[back to top]

Rate of Resectability (RR)

Rate of resectability will be evaluated by determining the percentage of patients who were initially deemed to have ULA or borderline resectable (BR) disease and, following any period of treatment, were subsequently deemed to have resectable disease and undergo surgical resection. The denominator will reflect all patients with ULA or BR disease. (NCT01688336)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
FOLFIRINOX22

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival will be measured from D1 of treatment until evidence of tumor progression (including clinical deterioration related to the underlying pancreatic cancer, as assessed by the investigator) or death from any cause. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Patients that are lost to follow-up will be censored (NCT01688336)
Timeframe: the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
FOLFIRINOX10.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Months

This measure is the median time of survival (in months) at five years from the initiation of therapy. Results will be presented for two cohorts: subjects completing neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection; and subjects completing neoadjuvant therapy but without surgical resection. (NCT01726582)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Milestones Related to Therapy (Resected)45
Milestones Related to Therapy (Non-Resected)11

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

This measure is the number of subjects not experiencing tumor progression at five years from initiating therapy. (NCT01726582)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Milestones Related to Usual Therapy36

[back to top]

Use of Biomarkers to Determine Course of Treatment

The number of subjects for whom a biomarker (i.e., molecular profile) was used to determine the course of treatment. (NCT01726582)
Timeframe: Initiation of therapy (approximately 4 to 12 weeks after screening) until surgery (approximately 10 to 20 weeks after screening)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Milestones Related to Usual Therapy92

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Completing Therapy Including Surgical Resection.

This outcome measure is the number of subjects completing therapy up to and including surgical resection. In this context, surgical excision of residual tumor is an option in the progression of usual care. Surgery was contraindicated for some participants. This measure is the number of subject who were eligible for and completed the surgical procedure. (NCT01726582)
Timeframe: At time of surgery (approximately 10 to 20 weeks after screening)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Milestones Related to Usual Therapy107

[back to top]

Time to PFS2

Time to PFS2 was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression after reinduction of second-line therapy, as assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression was defined as sum of longest diameters increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study. The sum of longest diameters must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to disease progression during second-line therapy or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab18.76
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab13.17
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab14.75
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab15.08

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization until death due to any cause (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab33.97
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab28.32
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab30.65
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab28.32

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Who Underwent Liver Metastases Resections

Reported here is the proportion of participants who underwent liver metastases resections calculated as follows: number of participants who underwent liver metastases resections divided by total number of participants in each arm. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to approximately 3 years

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.17
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.10
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab0.08
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.14

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants Considered by the Investigator to be Unresectable on Study Enrollment Who Subsequently Underwent Attempted Curative Resections of Metastases

The proportion of participants considered by the investigator to be unresectable at study enrollment who subsequently underwent attempted curative resections of metastases was calculated as follows: number of participants considered by the investigator to be unresectable at study enrollment who subsequently underwent attempted curative resections of metastases divided by total number of participants in each arm. This outcome represents a measure of the rate of conversion from unresectable to resectable disease. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to approximately 3 years

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.24
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.17
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab0.14
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab0.21

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival During First-Line Therapy (PFS1)

PFS1 was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression during first-line therapy, as assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression was defined as sum of longest diameters increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study. The sum of longest diameters must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to disease progression during first-line therapy or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab11.86
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab11.37
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab9.46
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab11.70

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response During First-Line Therapy (ORR1)

ORR1 was the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during first-line therapy as assessed by investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1). CR was defined as disappearance of all extranodal target lesions and all pathological lymph nodes had to have decreased to <10 millimeter (mm) in short axis. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR1 = CR + PR (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to disease progression during first-line therapy or death, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 3 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab72.0
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab72.8
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab62.1
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab72.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. (NCT01765582)
Timeframe: Randomization up to approximately 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A: Concurrent FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab100
Arm B: Sequential FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab98.9
Arm C: FOLFOX + Bevacizumab100
Arms A + B: Pooled FOLFOXIRI + Bevacizumab99.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients in the Dinutuximab Arm Who Are Responders

Percentage of patients who are responders to therapy with dinutuximab will be tabulated, including a 95% confidence interval on the response rate. Responders are defined as patients who achieve a best overall response of complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) per the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC). Per INRC: CR= Disappearance of all target lesions. No evidence of tumor at any site; VGPR= >90% decrease of disease measurement for CT/MRI target lesions. All pre-existing bone lesions with CR by MIBG; MIBG scan can be stable disease (SD) or CR in soft tissue lesions corresponding to lesions on CT/MRI. CR in bone marrow. No new sites of tumor; PR= ≥30% decrease in disease measurement for CT/MRI target lesions. Bone marrow with CR. MIBG with either PR/CR in bone lesions; MIBG may be SD or CR in soft tissue lesions corresponding to lesions on CT/MRI. Homovanillic acid (HVA)/ Vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) may still be elevated. (NCT01767194)
Timeframe: Up to the first 6 cycles of treatment

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Arm II (Temozolomide, Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Dinutuximab)41.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Randomized Patients Who Are Responders

The percentage of patients who are responders will be tabulated, including a 95% confidence interval on the response rate. Responders are defined as patients who achieve a best overall response of complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) per the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC). Per INRC: CR= Disappearance of all target lesions. No evidence of tumor at any site; VGPR= >90% decrease of the disease measurement for CT/MRI target lesions. All pre-existing bone lesions with CR by MIBG; MIBG scan can be stable disease (SD) or CR in soft tissue lesions corresponding to lesions on CT/MRI. CR in bone marrow. No new sites of tumor; PR= >=30% decrease in the disease measurement for CT/MRI target lesions. Bone marrow with CR. MIBG with either PR/CR in bone lesions; MIBG may be SD or CR in soft tissue lesions corresponding to lesions on CT/MRI. Homovanillic acid (HVA)/Vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) may still be elevated. (NCT01767194)
Timeframe: Up to the first 6 cycles of treatment

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I (Temozolomide, Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Temsirolimus)5.6
Arm II (Temozolomide, Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Dinutuximab)52.9

[back to top]

Overall Objective Response Rate

The primary objective of this phase 2 trial is to estimate the objective response rate (Complete Response or Partial Response, as measured by RECIST version 1.1) for patients with metastatic or recurrent NSCLC being treated with etirinotecan pegol after failure of second-line therapy. (NCT01773109)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Etirinotecan Pegol21718

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

(NCT01803282)
Timeframe: Part A: First dose date up to 32 weeks plus 30 days; Part B: First dose date up to 181 weeks plus 30 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part A: ADX 200 mg100.0
Part A: ADX 600 mg100.0
Part A: ADX 1800 mg83.3
Part B: PAC, ADX 800 mg100.0
Part B: LAC, ADX 1200 mg100.0
Part B: LSC, ADX 1200 mg100.0
Part B: EGC, ADX 800 mg100.0
Part B: FL CRC, ADX 800 mg+BEV 5 mg/kg100.0
Part B: FL CRC, ADX 800 mg+BEV 10 mg/kg100.0
Part B: SL CRC, ADX 800 mg+BEV 5 mg/kg100.0
Part B: SL CRC, ADX 800 mg+BEV 10 mg/kg100.0
Part B: BRCA, ADX 800 mg100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Abnormalities

Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increase at least one toxicity grade from baseline. Participants with any laboratory abnormality were reported. (NCT01803282)
Timeframe: Part A: First dose date up to 32 weeks plus 30 days; Part B: First dose date up to 181 weeks plus 30 days

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Any Laboratory abnormalities: HematologyAny Laboratory abnormalities: Serum ChemistryAny Laboratory abnormalities: Coagulation
Part A: ADX 1800 mg33.383.333.3
Part A: ADX 200 mg0.0100.025.0
Part A: ADX 600 mg33.366.70.0
Part B: BRCA, ADX 800 mg86.766.740.0
Part B: EGC, ADX 800 mg87.587.535.0
Part B: FL CRC, ADX 800 mg+BEV 10 mg/kg90.981.836.4
Part B: FL CRC, ADX 800 mg+BEV 5 mg/kg84.495.637.8
Part B: LAC, ADX 1200 mg90.060.010.0
Part B: LSC, ADX 1200 mg80.070.010.0
Part B: PAC, ADX 800 mg97.288.938.9
Part B: SL CRC, ADX 800 mg+BEV 10 mg/kg100.087.537.5
Part B: SL CRC, ADX 800 mg+BEV 5 mg/kg95.586.445.5

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Measured With Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1

Objective tumor response will be tabulated overall (and by dose level if appropriate). Responses will be summarized by simple descriptive summary statistics delineating complete and partial responses as well as stable and progressive disease in the cohorts (overall and by tumor group). (NCT01876446)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A: Chemo Resistant20
B: Chemo Sensitive39

[back to top]

Mean Duration of Response

The mean duration of response for those participants that responded to treatment by arm. (NCT01876446)
Timeframe: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
A: Chemo Resistant5.4
B: Chemo Sensitive7.0

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

The distribution of survival time was be estimated in each group using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01876446)
Timeframe: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
A: Chemo Resistant7.4
B: Chemo Sensitive7.1

[back to top]

18 Week Progression-free Survival Rate

The distribution of time to disease progression will be estimated in each group using the method of Kaplan-Meier at 18 weeks. (NCT01876446)
Timeframe: Time from registration to the date of first documented disease progression or death, assessed at 18 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A: Chemo Resistant35
B: Chemo Sensitive72

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 14 Days Post Start of Infusion (AUC0-14 Day) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free and VEGF-bound aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Plasma Free-Aflibercept (n=10)Plasma VEGF-Bound Aflibercept (n=5)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI31223.3

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Plasma Irinotecan (n=10)Plasma SN-38 (n=4)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI17700341

[back to top]

Aflibercept Immunogenicity Assessment: Number of Participants With Positive Sample(s) in the Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Assay and in the Neutralizing Anti-drug Antibodies (NAb) Assay

Blood samples of participants were analyzed by using a titer-based, bridging immunoassay developed and validated to detect aflibercept ADA in human serum. Samples with positive antibody levels were further analyzed using a validated, non-quantitative, competitive ligand binding assay to detect NAb. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Baseline, at any time post baseline and 90 days after the last dose of aflibercept

Interventionparticipants (Number)
At baseline in the ADA assay (n=62)At any time post-baseline in the ADA assay (n=62)At any time post-baseline in the NAb assay (n=62)At 90 days after last dose in the ADA assay (n=50)At 90 days after last dose in NAb assay (n=50)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI10000

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI355

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 14 Days Post Start of Infusion (AUC0-14 Day) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed PK analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI246.9

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Irinotecan: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliter (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI92.5

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliters (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI3.53

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at the Steady State (Vss) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed PK analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionliters (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI6.197

[back to top]

Total Body Clearance (CL) for Irinotecan: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliter/hour (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI18.3

[back to top]

Total Body Clearance (CL) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliter/day (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI0.716

[back to top]

Total Body Clearance (CL) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed PK analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionliter/day (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI0.8053

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2z) for Free Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventiondays (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI4.47

[back to top]

Steady State Drug Concentration (Css) for 5-FU: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of 5-FU in combination with aflibercept and irinotecan in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 2.5, 21 and 45 hours post 5-FU infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI930

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time interval from the date of first study drug administration to the date of first observation of DP or death due to any cause, whichever came first. If death or progression was not observed, the participant was censored at the date of participant's last valid progression-free tumor assessment prior to the study cut-off date. DP for PFS was assessed by the IRRC based on tumor imaging according to RECIST 1.1. Progression in disease was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study with absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 6 weeks until DP or death, due to any cause (maximum duration: 16.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI5.42

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

Overall response in participants was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed by an independent radiological review committee (IRRC) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions; any lymph node (target or non-target) must have reduction in the short axis to <10 mm; PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Percentage of participants with overall response and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were provided. The 95% CI was calculated using normal approximation. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Baseline and every 6 weeks until DP (maximum duration: 16.4 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI8.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time interval from the date of first study drug administration to the date of death due to any cause. If death was not observed, the participant was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive or the study cut-off date, whichever was first. OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier estimates. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Baseline up to death or study cut--off (maximum duration: 24.7 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI15.59

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed or worsened during the on--treatment period which was defined as the period from the time of first dose of study treatment until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: First dose (Day 1 of Cycle 1) of study treatment up to end of treatment visit (30 days after last dose of study treatment) (maximum duration: 77 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI62

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI73.19

[back to top]

Clearance at Steady State (CLss) for 5-FU: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of 5-FU in combination with aflibercept and irinotecan in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 2.5, 21 and 45 hours post 5-FU infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionliter/hour (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI122

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) for Free Aflibercept: ITT Population

Sparse blood sampling was performed on 52 participants and additional blood sampling for detailed PK analysis was performed on 10 participants as per protocol. A population PK analysis was performed and an overall data is reported for all the participants. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 4, 24, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with sparse sampling & pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168, 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1 for participants with additional sampling

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI304.6

[back to top]

Active Metabolite SN-38 / Irinotecan Ratio on Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (Rmet): Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non - compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionratio (Mean)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI0.0313

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration Observed (Tmax) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept in Cycle 1: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free and VEGF-bound aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventiondays (Median)
Plasma Free-Aflibercept (n=10)Plasma VEGF-Bound Aflibercept (n=8)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI0.0713.97

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2z) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionhours (Mean)
Plasma Irinotecan (n=10)Plasma SN-38 (n=5)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI5.1910.3

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Plasma IrinotecanPlasma SN-38
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI222032.2

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Free and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free and VEGF-bound aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg/mL (Mean)
Plasma Free-Aflibercept (n=10)Plasma VEGF-Bound Aflibercept (n=8)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI90.82.83

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of irinotecan and SN-38 in combination with aflibercept and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1.5, 2, 4.5 and 23 hours post irinotecan infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Plasma IrinotecanPlasma SN-38
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI16900344

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Free and VEGF-Bound Aflibercept: Participants With Additional Blood Sampling for Detailed PK Analysis

In 10 participants of ITT population, additional blood samples were obtained for detailed non-compartmental PK analysis of free and VEGF-bound aflibercept in combination with irinotecan and 5-FU in Cycle 1. (NCT01882868)
Timeframe: Predose (prior to aflibercept infusion), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours post aflibercept infusion on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Interventionmcg*day/mL (Mean)
Plasma Free-Aflibercept (n=10)Plasma VEGF-Bound Aflibercept (n=8)
Aflibercept + FOLFIRI32124.4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression Free Survival is the time (in months) from start of treatment to progression, clinical deterioration attributed to disease, or death. (NCT01896856)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Arm A SGI-110 + Irinotecan2.37
Phase 2: Arm B Regorafenib or TAS-1022.09

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity

"Number of participants experiencing a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) in each dose level. DLT is defined as any of the following study drug-related toxicities occurring during the first cycle of study drug on study:~grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting >7days~any grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia~grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity unless it could be managed by supportive treatment~any other clinically significant adverse event which would place subjects at undue safety risk, or results in discontinuation of treatment." (NCT01896856)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 11
Dose Level -12
Dose Level -1G1
Dose Level 1G1

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the number of subjects achieving a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. CR = disappearance of all target lesions, PR = at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. (NCT01896856)
Timeframe: Assessed until disease progression, up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2: Arm A SGI-110 + Irinotecan1
Phase 2: Arm B Regorafenib or TAS-1020

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is defined as the time (in months) between the start of treatment and death. (NCT01896856)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Arm A SGI-110 + Irinotecan7.15
Phase 2: Arm B Regorafenib or TAS-1027.66

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving R0 Resection (R0 Resection Rate)

The percentage of participants achieving R0 resection, defined as the absence of gross and microscopic tumor involvement in the resection margins, will be determined for those participants who receive at least one cycle of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. A 90% confidence interval will be determined. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)55.6

[back to top]

Toxicities Associated With Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy

The number of patients who experienced treatment related adverse events will be determined for all patients who received at least one cycle of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. These events will be graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)22

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free Survival defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of disease progression will be analyzed. Median progression free survival will be presented. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: From start of treatment to time of progression, assessed up to 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)34

[back to top]

Vascular Reconstruction

The percentage of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy requiring vascular reconstruction will be evaluated. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Able to Undergo Resection

The percentage of participants with resectable or borderline resectable disease to undergo resection will be determined. The ability for patients to complete preoperative therapy and undergo resection is correlated with more favorable overall survival outcomes. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)15

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Median Overall Survival defined as the the duration of time from diagnosis to the time of death from any cause will be determined. (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)35.1

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Overall Response Rate, defined as the percentage of patients that achieved Partial Response (PR) or Complete Response (CR) as per the Response evaluation in solid tumors criteria, was assessed using RECIST Version 1.1 criteria. Complete Response (CR) is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. Partial Response (PR) is defined as having at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Higher percentages of PR and CR are associated with more favorable outcomes (NCT01897454)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, IMRT, and Gemcitabine Hydrochloride)4

[back to top]

Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of SN-38

AUCinf refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinite time. AUCinf of SN-38 (an irinotecan metabolite) was calculated using the formula: AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (number of participants =2, 3)Cycle 2 Day 1
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm ANANA
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)230.4279.7

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) of PF-05212384

T½ was calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear decline were used in the regression. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9 and Cycle 1 Day 16.

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 9Cycle 1 Day 16 (number of participants =4, 6)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A37.6535.10
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)37.7836.07

[back to top]

Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time for the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Irinotecan

AUClast refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero to the time for the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast of irinotecan was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1 (number of participants =4, 5)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A118608776
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)1103010380

[back to top]

Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time for the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of SN-38

AUClast refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero to the time for the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast of SN-38 (an irinotecan metabolite) was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1 (number of participants =4, 5)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A217.0182.4
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)217.9228.5

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Irinotecan

Cmax of irinotecan was observed directly from data. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1 (number of participants =4, 5)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A22831620
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)21231999

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) of Irinotecan

T½ was calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear decline were used in the regression. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1 (number of participants =4, 5)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A5.5475.293
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)5.2555.344

[back to top]

Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero to the Time for the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of PF-05212384

AUClast refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero to the time for the last quantifiable concentration. AUClast of PF-05212384 was determined using linear/log trapezoidal method. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A11530
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)13390

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade

TEAEs were those AEs with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study drug. CTCAE version 4.0 was used to grade the severity of TEAEs. Grade 1 referred to mild AEs; Grade 2 referred to moderate AEs; Grade 3 referred to severe AEs; Grade 4 referred to AEs with life-threatening consequences, and urgent intervention was needed to manage them; Grade 5 referred to death related to AE. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Administration of the first dose of study drug through 28 calendar days after the last administration of study drug

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B21201
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A11320
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)20400

[back to top]

Time for Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of SN-38

SN-38 is an irinotecan metabolite. Tmax of SN-38 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1 (number of participants =4, 5)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A2.002.03
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)1.981.93

[back to top]

Time for Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of PF-05212384

Tmax of PF-05212384 was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9 and Cycle 1 Day 16.

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 9Cycle 1 Day 16 (number of participants =5, 6)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A0.4830.500
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)0.4830.500

[back to top]

Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of PF-05212384

AUCinf refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinite time. AUCinf of PF-05212384 was calculated using the formula: AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9.

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A11700
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)13580

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Coagulation) Abnormalities

Coagulation analysis included partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and international normalized ratio (INR) or prothrombin time (PT). (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PTT (number of participants =7, 6, 5)PT (number of participants =7, 5, 6)PT INR
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B432
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A231
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)012

[back to top]

Number of Participants With ECG Maximum Increase From Baseline Meeting Pre-defined Criteria

"The number of participants with ECG maximum increase from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported:~Criterion A: maximum QTc interval increase from baseline >30 msec and ≤60 msec; criterion B: maximum QTc interval increase from baseline >60 msec; criterion C: maximum QTcB interval increase from baseline >30 msec and ≤60 msec; criterion D: maximum QTcB interval increase from baseline >60 msec; criterion E: maximum QTcF interval increase from baseline >30 msec and ≤60 msec; criterion F: maximum QTcF interval increase from baseline >60 msec." (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Criterion ACriterion BCriterion CCriterion DCriterion ECriterion F
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B101000
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A100000
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Urinalysis) Abnormalities

Urinalysis included urine dipstick for protein and blood: if positive, perform a microscopic analysis. Number of participants with urine protein tested positive is presented. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A3
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B1
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Unacceptable Toxicity in Cycle 1 (Japanese LIC Only)

Unacceptable toxicity (according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE], Version 4.0) was any of the following occurrences: (1) Grade 4 neutropenia >7 days, or febrile neutropenia, or Grade 4 thrombocytopenia; (2) Grade >=3 nausea/vomiting despite optimal antiemetic treatment, or Grade >=3 diarrhea despite optimal anti diarrheal treatment; (3) unmanageable Grade >=3 hyperglycemia; (4) mean QTc interval (time from electrocardiogram [ECG] Q wave to the end of the T wave corresponding to electrical systole, corrected for heart rate) >501 msec in triplicate 12-lead ECG, or myocardial infarction, or ventricular arrhythmia; (5) Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicity; (6) treatment delay of >=2 weeks due to study drug related toxicity; (7) persistent, intolerable toxicities which resulted in failure to deliver at least 75% of doses of both PF-05212384 and irinotecan during Cycle 1; (8) Grade >=2 respiratory toxicities. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from enrollment to death. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm ANA
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm BNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with objective response was based on assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. Confirmed PR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Confirmed PR was defined as >=30% decrease in sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking the baseline sum as a reference. Confirmed responses were those that persisted on repeat imaging study >=4 weeks after initial documentation of response. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A14.3
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B50.0
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)0

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of PF-05212384

Cmax of PF-05212384 was observed directly from data. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, 72, 120 hours post PF-05212384 infusion on Cycle 1 Day 9 and Cycle 1 Day 16.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 9Cycle 1 Day 16 (number of participants =5, 6)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A834510120
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)85349670

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was defined as any untoward occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study drug. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Administration of the first dose of study drug through 28 calendar days after the last administration of study drug

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B61
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A73
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)61

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Hematology) Abnormalities

The following hematology parameters were evaluated in this study: hemoglobin, white blood cells (WBC) with differential, and platelets. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnemiaHemoglobin increasedLymphocyte count increasedLymphopeniaNeutrophils (absolute)PlateletsWhite blood cells
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B6024334
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A6005404
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)6005515

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Test (Chemistry) Abnormalities

The following chemistry parameters were evaluated in this study: sodium, potassium, magnesium, chloride, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or urea, creatinine, total calcium, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), glucose, uric acid, phosphorus or phosphate, insulin, and C-peptide. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALTAlkaline phosphataseASTTotal bilirubinCreatitineHypercalcemiaHyperglycemiaHyperkalemiaHypermagnesemiaHypernatremiaHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypoglycemiaHypokalemiaHypomagnesemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemia
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B14113040004312411
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A23204161012202322
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)14106040014303100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With ECG Post-Baseline Maximum Absolute Values Meeting Pre-defined Criteria

The number of participants with ECG post-baseline maximum absolute values meeting the following criteria was reported: (1) maximum QTc interval ranged from 450 to 480 msec; >480-500 msec; >500 msec; (2) maximum QTcB (QT corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula) interval ranged from 450 to 480 msec; >480-500 msec; >500 msec; (3) maximum QTcF (QT corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) interval ranged from 450 to 480 msec; >480-500 msec; >500 msec. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Maximum QTc interval: 450-480 msecMaximum QTc interval: >480-500 msecMaximum QTc interval: >500 msecMaximum QTcB interval: 450-480 msecMaximum QTcB interval: >480-500 msecMaximum QTcB interval: >500 msecMaximum QTcF interval: >450-480 msecMaximum QTcF interval: >480-500 msecMaximum QTcF interval: >500 msec
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B100100000
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A200300100
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)100000000

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Investigators

Progression-free survival (PFS) was the time from the first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum was observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. Median PFS was estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: From date of first dose until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A3.7
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm BNA

[back to top]

Duration of Response

For participants with an objective response (CR or PR), duration of response was defined as the time from first documentation of CR or PR to date of first documentation of objective progression or death. Date of first documentation of progression and date of first documentation of CR or PR were based on Investigator's assessment of response. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm ANA
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm BNA

[back to top]

Area Under Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Irinotecan

AUCinf refers to the area under plasma concentration time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinite time. AUCinf of irinotecan was calculated using the formula: AUCinf = AUClast + (Clast*/kel), where Clast* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log-linear regression analysis. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1 (number of participants =4, 5)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A124809216
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)1157010950

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SN-38

SN-38 is an irinotecan metabolite. Cmax of SN-38 was observed directly from data. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1 (number of participants =4, 5)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A23.5122.81
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)24.2528.04

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half Life (t½) of SN-38

T½ was calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Only those data points judged to describe the terminal log-linear decline were used in the regression. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (number of participants =2, 3)Cycle 2 Day 1
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm ANANA
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)9.8908.840

[back to top]

Time for Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Irinotecan

Tmax of irinotecan was observed directly from data as time of first occurrence. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: Pre-dose (0 hour), 1.5, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post irinotecan infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1.

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1 (number of participants =4, 5)
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A1.501.55
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)1.531.53

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Expression of Pre-defined Gene Sequences in Biopsied Tumor Tissues

Pre-defined gene sequences were those related to EGFR, PI3K (phosphoinositide-3 kinase) and other oncogenic pathways; examples included but were not limited to PIK3CA (this gene encodes the catalytic subunit of PI3K), PIK3R1 (this gene encodes the regulatory subunit of PI3K), KRAS, NRAS and BRAF (this gene encodes serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf) sequences and PIK3CA gene amplification. Due to early termination of this study, these pre-defined gene sequences were not analyzed, except for KRAS and NRAS. Number of participants who had KRAS and NRAS wild type status confirmed by the central laboratory is presented. (NCT01925274)
Timeframe: 2 years

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Confirmed wild type KRASConfirmed wild type NRAS
Cetuximab + Irinotecan: Arm B33
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Arm A44
PF-05212384 + Irinotecan: Japanese Lead-In Cohort (LIC)63

[back to top]

Grade 2 or Greater Gastrointestinal (GI) Toxicity

"Toxicity means an adverse event related to the study treatment. Toxicity was assessed between treatment groups as the number of treatment-related , ≥ grade 2 events of gastritis, fistula, enteritis, or ulcer; plus any other Grade 3 to 5 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. The outcome is reported as the number of defined adverse events by preferred term for each treatment group, occurring within 3 months of the start of treatment. These adverse events by definition are all within the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.01 Gastrointestinal Body System. The outcome is reported as numbers without dispersion.~All-cause Mortality mFFX 7 SBRT 8" (NCT01926197)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
InterventionRelated adverse events (Number)
Blood in stool (melena)ColitisColonic obstructionDiarrheaDuodenal perforationFistula, analFluid in abdomen (ascites)Gastrointestinal bleed (hemorrhage)Gastrointestinal bleed (hemorrhage), upperGastrointestinal inflammation (enterocolitis)NauseaPain, abdominalPain, intractable (due to disease progression)Stool discolored, clay colorVomited blood (hematemesis)
Modified FOLFIRINOX111300010133010
Modified FOLFIRINOX Plus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy000013213014104

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 1 Year

"Progression-free survival (PFS) means the period of time that a participant remains alive without tumor progression either locally or at a distant site in the body (metastasis). The effect of the study treatments was assessed as the number of participants in each treatment group that remained alive without tumor progression, at 1 year after treatment.~The outcome is reported as a number without dispersion." (NCT01926197)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Modified FOLFIRINOX5
Modified FOLFIRINOX Plus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) means the period of time that a participant remains alive without tumor progression either locally or at a distant site in the body (metastasis). The effect of the study treatments was assessed as the median PFS of participants in the treatment groups. The outcome is reported as the median PFS with standard deviation. (NCT01926197)
Timeframe: 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Modified FOLFIRINOX6.5
Modified FOLFIRINOX Plus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy8.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The effect of the study treatments was assessed as the length of time participants in each treatment group that remained alive. The outcome is reported as the median OS with standard deviation. (NCT01926197)
Timeframe: 62 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Modified FOLFIRINOX12.9
Modified FOLFIRINOX Plus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy13.4

[back to top]

Metastasis-free Survival (MFS)

Metastasis-free survival (MFS) means the period of time that a participant remains alive without the appearance of new tumor lesions a distant site in the body (metastasis). The effect of the study treatments was assessed as the median MFS of participants in the treatment groups. The outcome is reported as the median PFS with standard deviation. (NCT01926197)
Timeframe: 62 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Modified FOLFIRINOX12.9
Modified FOLFIRINOX Plus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy10.8

[back to top]

Local Progression-free Survival (Local PFS)

Local progression-free survival (PFS) means the period of time that a participant remains alive without recurrence or advancement of the disease at the baseline sites of the tumor (local progression). The effect of the study treatments was assessed as the median local PFS of participants in the treatment groups. The outcome is reported as the median local PFS with standard deviation. (NCT01926197)
Timeframe: 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Modified FOLFIRINOX6.5
Modified FOLFIRINOX Plus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy8.4

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate

"Clinical benefit rate is the percentage of combined patients who have achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD)~CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm~PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters~SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study." (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through completion of treatment (estimated to be 4 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)33
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)22

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Time measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through 1 year after completion of treatment (median follow-up 16.2 months - 95% CI 4.7-42.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)5.8
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)10.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Objective Response

"Objective response (defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria)~CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.~PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters." (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through completion of treatment (estimated to be 4 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)25
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)22

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time interval from date of diagnosis to date of death from any cause. (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through 1 year after completion of treatment (median follow-up 16.2 months - 95% CI 4.7-42.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)15.5
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)19.6

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first. (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through 1 year after completion of treatment (median follow-up 16.2 months - 95% CI 4.7-42.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)8.4
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)13.8

[back to top]

Toxicity and Tolerability (Arm A and Arm B) as Measured by the Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

(NCT01928290)
Timeframe: 30 days after completion of treatment (estimated to be 5 months)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnemiaFebrile neutropeniaAnal FistulaDiarrheaHematemesisNauseaPeripheral ischemiaVomitingFatigueLaparoscopy surgeryPainSepsisLung infectionPneumoniaHypernatremiaNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedAnorexiaDehydrationHypokalemiaBack painPeripheral sensory neuropathySyncopeDyspneaPleural embolismSkin infectionThromboembolic eventAbdominal painEnterocolitisHemorrhoidsG-tube infectionNeutropenic entercolitisAlkaline phosphatase increased
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)1214121341111111933411211114000000
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)000502010000000800020010000111111

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression. Progression is defined as At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (NCT01928290)
Timeframe: Through 1 year after completion of treatment (median follow-up 16.2 months - 95% CI 4.7-42.5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: FOLFIRINOX (HER2-negative)8.0
Arm B: FOLFIRINOX & Trastuzumab (HER2-positive)13.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate (Confirmed and Unconfirmed, Complete and Partial)

"Objective tumor response rate (complete response, unconfirmed complete response, partial response, unconfirmed partial response) in patients with measurable disease were assessed in each arm and compared between arms using Chi-squared test.~Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions" (NCT01959139)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX45
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH2033

[back to top]

Phase II: Overall Survival

"Time from date of registration to date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact.~Assessed using the logrank test." (NCT01959139)
Timeframe: From date of registration to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX14.4
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH207.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II)

Time from date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration or death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive without report of progression are censored at date of last contact. (NCT01959139)
Timeframe: From date of registration to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX6.2
Phase II: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH204.3

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of PEGPH20 in Combination With mFOLFIRINOX

"Assess safety of mFOLFIRINOX in combination with PEGPH20 and select the optimal dose of PEGPH20 for the Phase II portion.~MTD of PEGPH20 in combination with mFOLFORINOX was evaluated by testing decreasing doses of PEGPH20 from 3mcg/kg on Day 1 and Day 3/4, to 3mcg/kg on Day 1 only and to 1.6 mcg/kg on Day 1 only.~MTD reflects the highest dose that had a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of ≤ 17%. DLTs were defined as treatment regimen related: grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicity; grade 4 absolute neutrophil count (ANC) anemia or thrombocytopenia; grade 4 ANC lasting > 7 days; grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia; grade ≥ 3 elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, and creatinine; delay in starting the 2nd cycle of mFOLFIRINOX by > 2 weeks due to drug related toxicity.~DLT were graded using the NCI CTCAE version 4. Note: the third and lowest dose level was not reached." (NCT01959139)
Timeframe: 2 cycles of 14 days

Interventionug/kg (Number)
Phase I: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH20, 3 ug/kg on Day 1 and Day 3/40
Phase I: mFOLFIRINOX + PEGPH20, 3 ug/kg on Day 13
All Phase 1 Participants3

[back to top]

The Objective Response Rate of Napabucasin Administered in Combination in FOLFIRI in Patients With FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Assessment of the objective response rate (ORR) of napabucasin administered in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. The Objective Response Rate (ORR) is the proportion of participants with a complete response or partial response who have measurable disease at baseline imaging. (NCT02024607)
Timeframe: From the date of first treatment, every 8 weeks, until the date of first documented objective disease progression, up to 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Napabucasin Plus FOLFIRI0

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate of Patients With FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

To determine the disease control rate of napabucasin administered in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Percentage of participants with a documented complete response, partial response and stable disease based on RECIST 1.1. (NCT02024607)
Timeframe: From the date of first treatment, every 8 weeks, until the date of first documented objective disease progression, up to 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Napabucasin Plus FOLFIRI56.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

Assessment of safety of napabucasin administered in combination with either FOLFOX6 with and without bevacizumab, or CAPOX, or FOLFIRI with and without bevacizumab, or regorafenib, or irinotecan in participants with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies by reporting of adverse events and serious adverse events (NCT02024607)
Timeframe: The time from the date of first treatment, while the patient is taking napabucasin, and for 30 days after stopping therapy, an average of 4 months.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Napabucasin Plus FOLFOX6115
Napabucasin Plus FOLFOX6 Plus Bevacizumab41
Napabucasin Plus CAPOX87
Napabucasin Plus FOLFIRI156
Napabucasin Plus FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab40
Napabucasin Plus Regorafenib54
Napabucasin Plus Irinotecan2

[back to top]

Overall Survival of Patients With FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The effect of napabucasin given in combination with FOLFIRI on Overall Survival (OS) of patients with FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. (NCT02024607)
Timeframe: 4 weeks after the patient has been off study treatment, every 3 months thereafter until death, the study closes, up to 36 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Napabucasin Plus FOLFIRI8.97

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival of Patients With FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The effect of napabucasin given in combination with FOLFIRI on Progression Free Survival (PFS) of patients with FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. PFS of patients with FOLFIRI/XELIRI-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. (NCT02024607)
Timeframe: The time from the date of first treatment to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, up to thirty six months

Interventionmonths (Number)
Napabucasin Plus FOLFIRI20.82

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate

To determine the anti-tumor activity (specifically the disease control rate) of napabucasin administered in combination with either FOLFOX6 with and without bevacizumab, or CAPOX, or FOLFIRI with and without bevacizumab, or regorafenib, or irinotecan. Percentage of participants with a documented complete response, partial response and stable disease based on RECIST 1.1. (NCT02024607)
Timeframe: From the date of first treatment, every 8 weeks, until the date of first documented objective disease progression, up to 24 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Napabucasin Plus FOLFOX654.7
Napabucasin Plus FOLFOX6 Plus Bevacizumab76.2
Napabucasin Plus CAPOX55.3
Napabucasin Plus FOLFIRI65.7
Napabucasin Plus FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab87.0
Napabucasin Plus Regorafenib34.4
Napabucasin Plus Irinotecan100

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response After One Course of Therapy

To identify the MIBG treatment regimen associated with the highest overall response rate after one course of treatment on the three arms. The response evaluation was based on central review (intent to treat analysis). Responders defined as meeting CR/MRD/PR criteria. Response was based on NANT response criteria v1.2 (https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.26940). RECST 1.1 criteria was used for measurable tumors with PR criteria > 30% decrease in target tumor size. Curie score was used with PR criteria > 50% decrease in Curie score. Complete Response- disappearance of all target lesions, Curie score of 0 and no detectable bone marrow disease. Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR. (NCT02035137)
Timeframe: 43-50 days from study day 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single-Agent 131I-MIBG5
131I-MIBG With Vincristine/Irinotecan5
131I-MIBG With Vorinostat11

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Greater Non-hematologic Toxicities

Compare toxicity profiles for grade 3 or greater toxicities associated with each of 131I-MIBG treatment regimens; single-agent 131I-MIBG; Vincristine/Irinotecan/131I-MIBG; or Vorinostat/131I-MIBG (NCT02035137)
Timeframe: All toxicities from enrollment through 30 days following end of protocol therapy, an average of 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Single-Agent 131I-MIBG7
131I-MIBG With Vincristine/Irinotecan17
131I-MIBG With Vorinostat12

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-versus-time Curve (AUC) at Cycle 1 (AUC0-336h) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

"To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BEVZ92 and Avastin®, both administered in combination with FOLFOX (any) or FOLFIRI, by means of comparing the truncated AUC calculated from start of the first infusion until start of the second infusion (i.e. at Cycle 1; AUC0-336h)~For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of a log-transformed exposure measure (AUC) falls completely within the range 80-125%." (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: AUC0-336 hrs: 0 to 336 hours after start of the first infusion

Interventionng.h/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)16500000
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).16600000

[back to top]

AUC at Steady State (AUCss) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

"To compare the PK profile of BEVZ92 and Avastin®, both administered in combination with FOLFOX (any) or FOLFIRI, by means of comparing the truncated area under the concentration-versus-time curve calculated over a dosage interval at steady state (i.e. at Cycle 7; AUCss).~For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% CI of the ratio of a log-transformed exposure measure (AUC) falls completely within the range 80-125%." (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: AUCss: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of Cycle 7 infusion (Week 13).

Interventionng.h/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)35900000
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).35700000

[back to top]

Cmax,sd of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Cmax calculated at Cycle 1 (Cmax,sd ) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Cmax, sd: 0 to 336 hours after start of the first infusion.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)120000
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).123000

[back to top]

Cmax,ss of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Cmax calculated at Cycle 7 (Cmax, ss ) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Cmax, ss: 0 to 336 hours post-dose after the administration of Cycle 7 infusion (Week 13)

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)195000
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).200000

[back to top]

Ctrough,sd of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Ctrough calculated at Cycle 1 (Ctrough,sd ) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Ctrough, sd: 0 to 336 hours after start of the first infusion.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)344
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).349

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution (Vd) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Vd calculated at Cycle 7 (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Vd: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of the Cycle 7 infusion.

InterventionL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)4.06
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).3.86

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

"To compare efficacy in terms of ORR between arms. Clinical and radiological tumor assessments were performed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.~Objective response (OR) is defined as a best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) as defined by RECIST v1.1. All participants who did not meet the criteria for CR or PR by the end of the study were considered non-responders." (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Every four weeks. Up to 48 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ORR (CR+PR)Stable diseaseProgressive diseaseunevaluable
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product)402524
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)352745

[back to top]

Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Immunogenicity profile by means of measurement of ADA developed de novo (seroconversion) after cycle 5, cycle 8, and 12 months after first drug administration (pre-dose). (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: At baseline, and on Day 1 (pre-dose) of Cycles: 1, 5 and 8, and 12 months after first drug administration

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SeroconversionNo seroconversion
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product)071
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)267

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

"Compare PFS between the randomized treatment arms. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression using RECIST v1.1, or death. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions plus 5 mm absolute increase, and/or unequivocal progression of known non-target lesion, and/or the appearance of new lesions." (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 48 weeks.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)10.8
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product)11.1

[back to top]

Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Kel calculated at Cycle 7 (Ctrough,ss) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Kel: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of the Cycle 7 infusion.

Interventionl/h (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)0.00236
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).0.00240

[back to top]

Elimination Half-life (t1/2) of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the t1/2 calculated at Cycle 7 (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: t1/2: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of the Cycle 7 infusion.

Interventionh (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)294
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).289

[back to top]

Ctrough,ss of BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Secondary PK endpoints included the Ctrough calculated at Cycle 7 (Ctrough,ss) (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: Ctrough, ss: 0 to 336 hours after the administration of the Cycle 7 infusion.

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)69600
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product).69300

[back to top]

Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Reported With BEVZ92 and Avastin®

Compare the safety profile by means of the frequency and severity of TEAEs and SAEs reported in each treatment arm. (NCT02069704)
Timeframe: From first study dose and up to 30 days after the end of study treatment for each patient, for an average of 11 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any TEAE (any causality)Any grade>=3 TEAEAny TEAE leading to discontinuationAny treatment-related TEAEAny grade >=3 treatment-related TEAEAny serious TEAEAny bleeding event
Avastin® (Bevacizumab, Ref. Product)7149670702119
Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BEVZ92)66441363631914

[back to top]

Number and Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response With Partial or Complete Response

Frequency (%) of response-evaluable patients with best overall response of partial or complete response as determined by revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1). (NCT02095132)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part A, Dose Level 11
Part A, Dose Level 20
Part A, Dose Level 30
Part A, Dose Level 40
Part A, Dose Level 50
Part A, PK Expansion0
Part B, Neuroblastoma3
Part C, Medulloblastoma/CNS PNET2
Part D, Rhabdomyosarcoma0

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of Adavosertib in Terms of Systemic Exposure, AUC

The PK parameters will be summarized by means and standard deviations (NCT02095132)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1 prior to the irinotecan infusion, prior to the adavosertib dose, 4 hours after the dose of adavosertib is given, and prior to the irinotecan dose on day 2

Interventionhr*nmol/L (Mean)
Part A, Dose Level 13222.95
Part A, Dose Level 23397.3
Part A, Dose Level 34413.22
Part A, Dose Level 45344.96
Part A, Dose Level 55161.36
Part A, PK Expansion4655.13

[back to top]

Number and Percentage of Part B Neuroblastoma Participants With MYCN Amplification

Frequency (%) of Part B Neuroblastoma participants with MYCN amplification. (NCT02095132)
Timeframe: Assessed at Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part B, Neuroblastoma2

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of Adavosertib in Terms of Systemic Exposure, Cmax

The PK parameters will be summarized by means and standard deviations (NCT02095132)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1 prior to the irinotecan infusion, prior to the adavosertib dose, 4 hours after the dose of adavosertib is given, and prior to the irinotecan dose on day 2

Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Part A, Dose Level 1443.96
Part A, Dose Level 2511.23
Part A, Dose Level 3539.84
Part A, Dose Level 4652.71
Part A, Dose Level 5733.59
Part A, PK Expansion590.28

[back to top]

Mean Fold Change in Gamma H2AX in Peripheral Blood Mono Nuclear Cells

Mean (SD) of the increase in gamma H2AX at 4 hours versus baseline among patients in Part A stratified by dose level. (NCT02095132)
Timeframe: Up to 1 day

InterventionFold change (Mean)
Part A, Dose Level 14.5
Part A, Dose Level 20.45
Part A, Dose Level 33.78
Part A, Dose Level 42
Part A, Dose Level 510

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of Adavosertib in Terms of Systemic Exposure, HL-Lambda (Half Life)

The PK parameters will be summarized by means and standard deviations (NCT02095132)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1 prior to the irinotecan infusion, prior to the adavosertib dose, 4 hours after the dose of adavosertib is given, and prior to the irinotecan dose on day 2

Interventionhours (Mean)
Part A, Dose Level 14.7
Part A, Dose Level 25.5
Part A, Dose Level 35.7
Part A, Dose Level 44.9
Part A, Dose Level 54
Part A, PK Expansion4.7

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of Adavosertib in Terms of Systemic Exposure, Tmax

The PK parameters will be summarized by means and standard deviations (NCT02095132)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1 prior to the irinotecan infusion, prior to the adavosertib dose, 4 hours after the dose of adavosertib is given, and prior to the irinotecan dose on day 2

Interventionhours (Mean)
Part A, Dose Level 13.5
Part A, Dose Level 22
Part A, Dose Level 33
Part A, Dose Level 43
Part A, Dose Level 52.4
Part A, PK Expansion3.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Cycle 1 DLT

To define and describe the toxicities of AZD1755 (MK-1775) in combination with oral irinotecan administered on this schedule. (NCT02095132)
Timeframe: Up to 21 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part A, Dose Level 10
Part A, Dose Level 20
Part A, Dose Level 30
Part A, Dose Level 40
Part A, Dose Level 52
Part A, PK Expansion0
Part B, Neuroblastoma1
Part C, Medulloblastoma/CNS PNET0
Part D, Rhabdomyosarcoma1

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

MTD is defined as the maximum doses of adavosertib and irinotecan hydrochloride at which fewer than one-third of patients experience dose limiting toxicities when receiving this combination. (NCT02095132)
Timeframe: Up to 21 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Irinotecan (IRIN)AZD1775 (MK-1775)
Part A9085

[back to top]

Duration of Response

"Duration of overall response was measured from the time that measurement criteria are met for complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (whichever status was recorded first) until the onset of progression. Patients without progression at the last tumor assessment date during their study participation were censored at this last tumor assessment date (exception: availability of validated information about a later onset of progression or a longer progression free interval - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the onset of progression or replaced the last tumor assessment date).~Missing onset of progression data because of refusal or because of death was replaced.~If several response evaluations for a patient showed progressive disease (PD), the time to PD was assessed by using the first of these measurements." (NCT02119026)
Timeframe: at the day of documented complete or partial response or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD

Interventiondays (Median)
A: XELIRI + BEV Followed by XELOX + BEV244.0
B: XELOX + BEV Followed by XELIRI + BEV315

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (Number of Participants With Response)

The rate of overall response was measured as the response rate from randomization until the day of documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (whichever status is recorded first). (NCT02119026)
Timeframe: at the day of documented complete or partial response or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
A: XELIRI + BEV Followed by XELOX + BEV32
B: XELOX + BEV Followed by XELIRI + BEV36

[back to top]

Overall Survival of XELIRI Plus Bevacizumab and XELOX Plus Bevacizumab

Overall survival was measured as the time from the randomization date to the date of death. Patients without death date were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment (exception: availability of validated information about a later exitus date or a prolonged survival - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the exitus date or replaced the last tumor assessment date) or the date of refusal. (NCT02119026)
Timeframe: date of death or date of last tumor assessment (28d safety f-u) in patients without death

Interventiondays (Median)
A: XELIRI + BEV Followed by XELOX + BEV593.0
B: XELOX + BEV Followed by XELIRI + BEV643

[back to top]

Tumour Assessments (Based on RECIST Criteria) in 1st-line

Best response in first line was based on the tumor assessments (based on RECIST criteria) for target lesions and assessed by CT scans, MRI scans, X-ray, bone scan and clinical examination: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (sum LD) of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD), >= 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started. (NCT02119026)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks, 28d Safety follow-up

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Progressive Disease (PD)Stable Disease (SD)Partial Response (PR)Complete Response (CR)
A: XELIRI + BEV Followed by XELOX + BEV421262
B: XELOX + BEV Followed by XELIRI + BEV123300

[back to top]

Tumour Assessments (Based on RECIST Criteria) in 2nd-line

Best response in second line was based on the tumor assessments (based on RECIST criteria) for target lesions and assessed by CT scans, MRI scans, X-ray, bone scan and clinical examination: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (sum LD) of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD), >= 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started. (NCT02119026)
Timeframe: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks, 28d Safety follow-up

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Progressive Disease (PD)Stable Disease (SD)Partial Response (PR)Complete Response (CR)Not available (NA)
A: XELIRI + BEV Followed by XELOX + BEV711608
B: XELOX + BEV Followed by XELIRI + BEV813201

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to overall response was measured from the time of randomization until the day of documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (whichever status is recorded first). Patients without response were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment, the date of death or the date of refusal. (NCT02119026)
Timeframe: at the day of documented complete or partial response or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD

Interventiondays (Median)
A: XELIRI + BEV Followed by XELOX + BEV185.0
B: XELOX + BEV Followed by XELIRI + BEV178.0

[back to top]

First Line Progression Free Survival (PFS)

The first line PFS was defined as the progression free survival interval during first line treatment. Patients without progression at the last tumor assessment date during their study participation were censored at this last tumor assessment date (exception: availability of validated information about a later onset of progression or a longer progression free interval - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the onset of progression or replaced the last tumor assessment date). Missing onset of progression data because of refusal or because of death was replaced. If several response evaluations for a patient showed progressive disease (PD), the time to PD was assessed by using the first of these measurements. (NCT02119026)
Timeframe: at progression of disease (PD) in first line therapy or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD

Interventiondays (Median)
A: XELIRI + BEV Followed by XELOX + BEV241
B: XELOX + BEV Followed by XELIRI + BEV280

[back to top]

Second Line PFS

"The second line PFS was defined as the progression free survival interval during second line treatment. Patients without progression at the last tumor assessment date during their study participation were censored at this last tumor assessment date (exception: availability of validated information about a later onset of progression or a longer progression free interval - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the onset of progression or replaced the last tumor assessment date). Missing onset of progression data because of refusal or because of death was replaced.~If several response evaluations for a patient showed progressive disease (PD), the time to PD was assessed by using the first of these measurements." (NCT02119026)
Timeframe: at progression of disease (PD) in second line therapy or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD

Interventiondays (Median)
A: XELIRI + BEV Followed by XELOX + BEV129
B: XELOX + BEV Followed by XELIRI + BEV155

[back to top]

Efficacy Duration of Disease Control by Tumor Assessment (CT/MRI/Clinical Examination)

The primary variable was duration of disease control (DDC) and was defined as the sum of progression free survival intervals during first line and second line treatment (= time from the beginning of first line treatment until onset of progression during second line treatment). Patients without progression at the last tumor assessment date during their study participation were censored at this last tumor assessment date (exception: availability of validated information about a later onset of progression or a longer progression free interval - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the onset of progression or replaced the last tumor assessment date). (NCT02119026)
Timeframe: screening, every 8 to 9 weeks until progression, at end of treatment (other than progression), every 3 months until progression, death or up to 24 months (whatever comes first)

Interventiondays (Median)
A: XELIRI + BEV Followed by XELOX + BEV373.00
B: XELOX + BEV Followed by XELIRI + BEV370.00

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival in Patients Who Register to Arm 3 (Crossover) After Disease Progression on Arm 1

From date of Step 3 Crossover registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive without report of progression are censored at date of last contact. Progression is defined as one or more of the following: 20% increase in the sum of appropriate diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease during therapy) using the same techniques as baseline, as well as an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm; unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease in the opinion of the treating physician; appearance of any new lesion/site; and/or death due to disease without prior documentation of progression and without symptomatic deterioration. (NCT02164916)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from randomization

Interventionmonths (Median)
Crossover: Vemurafenib + Cetuximab + Irinotecan5.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

From date of randomization to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and progression free are censored at date of last contact. Progression is defined as one or more of the following: 20% increase in the sum of appropriate diameters of target measurable lesions over smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease during therapy) using the same techniques as baseline, as well as an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm; unequivocal progression of non-measurable disease in the opinion of the treating physician; appearance of any new lesion/site; and/or death due to disease without prior documentation of progression and without symptomatic deterioration. (NCT02164916)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from randomization

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Cetuximab, Irinotecan Hydrochloride)2.0
Arm II (Cetuximab, Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Vemurafenib)4.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Patients Who Register to Arm 3 (Crossover) After Disease Progression on Arm 1

From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. (NCT02164916)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from randomization

Interventionmonths (Median)
Crossover: Vemurafenib + Cetuximab + Irinotecan12.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival

From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive are censored at date of last contact. (NCT02164916)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from randomization

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Cetuximab, Irinotecan Hydrochloride)5.9
Arm II (Cetuximab, Irinotecan Hydrochloride, Vemurafenib)9.6

[back to top]

Rate of R0 Resection

The percentage of patients with a final margin status of R0 after resection of their primary tumor and its 95% confidence interval will be provided. R0 resection indicates a microscopically margin-negative resection, in which no cancer cells seen microscopically at the primary tumor site. (NCT02178709)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FOLFIRINOX75.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Successfully Underwent Surgery After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX

The percentage of patients who successfully underwent surgery after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and its 95% confidence interval will be provided. (NCT02178709)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FOLFIRINOX76.7

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (Percentage of Patients With Complete Response, Partial Response, or Stable Disease)

"Measured by RECIST v1.1~Complete response: Disappearance of all target lesions Partial response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter Stable disease: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started~The percentage of patients with objective response and its 95% confidence interval will be provided." (NCT02178709)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FOLFIRINOX88.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from on study date to death due to any cause. Patients who remained alive were censored at their last known alive date. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the median and 95% confidence interval. (NCT02178709)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRINOX15.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Pathologic Complete Response

"Pathologic complete response was evaluated using MRI or CT and Evan's criteria for pathologic response following neoadjuvant therapy:~I: <10% to no tumor cells destroyed IIa: 10-50% of tumor cells destroyed IIb: 50-90% of tumor cells destroyed III: >90% of tumor cells destroyed IIIM: sizable pools of cellular mucin IV: No viable tumor cells (complete pathologic response) IVM: Acellular pools of mucin" (NCT02178709)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FOLFIRINOX0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (Percentage of Patients With Complete Response or Partial Response)

"Measured by RECIST v1.1 Complete response: Disappearance of all target lesions Partial response: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter~The percentage of patients with objective response and its 95% confidence interval will be provided." (NCT02178709)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FOLFIRINOX17.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Disease Free Survival

Disease free survival is defined as the time from on study date to evidence of tumor recurrence or death from any cause. Patients who remained alive and disease free were censored at their date of last disease evaluation. (NCT02178709)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
FOLFIRINOX8.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

The number of participants who experienced at least one grade 3 or higher adverse events assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days from last dose of study treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)9
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

The distribution of OS by group will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Median OS by treatment group with confidence intervals will be estimated based on Kaplan-Meier curves. The HR with confidence interval will be estimated based on stratified Cox models (stratified by levels of stratification factors), without and with adjusting for baseline clinical/pathological factors. (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)19.7
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)10.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at 6 Months

TTF is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of treatment discontinuation due to PD, death, or severe AE. The distribution of TTF by treatment group will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Six month event-free rates by treatment group with confidence intervals will be estimated based on Kaplan-Meier curves. The HR with confidence interval will be estimated based on stratified Cox models (stratified by levels of stratification factors), without and with adjusting for baseline clinical/pathological factors. PD: Any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: assessed at 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)72.7
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)38.4

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The distribution of PFS by group will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Median by treatment group with confidence intervals will be estimated based on Kaplan-Meier curves. The hazard ratio (HR) with confidence interval will be estimated based on stratified Cox models (stratified by levels of stratification factors), without and with adjusting for baseline clinical/pathological factors. Progression (PD) is defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. PD: Any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir). (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of 1st documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)9.7
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)5.5

[back to top]

12-month, 18-month, and 24-month Overall Survival (OS) Rates

The distribution of OS by group will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Twelve, 18- and 24-month survival rates by treatment group with confidence intervals will be estimated based on Kaplan-Meier curves. The HR with confidence interval will be estimated based on stratified Cox models (stratified by levels of stratification factors), without and with adjusting for baseline clinical/pathological factors. (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12-month OS rate18-month OS rate24-month OS rate
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)77.256.114.0
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)47.111.85.9

[back to top]

Relative Dose Intensity (RDI)

RDI is defined as the total dose of protocol therapy a patient actually received (i.e., summation of actually received dose at each cycle) divided by the total planned dose (i.e., summation of planned dose level at each cycle) multiplied by 100. Separate RDIs will be calculated for irinotecan and cetuximab. Agent-specific RDI will be summarized by medians, and min and max values, all of which will be compared between the two treatment groups by the Wilcoxon Rank sum test. (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

,
Interventionpercentage of dose received (Median)
CetuximabIrinotecan
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)98.589
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)95.590

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

The distribution of DOR by treatment group will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Six and 12 month durable response (i.e. maintaining CR or PR without progressive disease [PD]) rates by treatment group with confidence intervals will be estimated based on Kaplan-Meier curves. The HR with confidence interval will be estimated based on stratified Cox models (stratified by levels of stratification factors), without and with adjusting for baseline clinical/pathological factors.CR: Disappearance of all evidence of disease, PR: Regression of measurable disease and no new sites, PD: Any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: From the date of first tumor assessment with the response status being CR or PR to the date of 1st documented progressive disease, assessed up to 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)9.2
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)9.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The response rate (percentage) is the percent of participants whose best response was Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Percentage of successes will be estimated by 100 times the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Response rates (including complete and partial response) will be tested using Fisher's exact test. CR: Disappearance of all evidence of disease, PR: Regression of measurable disease and no new sites (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)36.8
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)11.8

[back to top]

6-month and 12-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rates

The distribution of PFS by group will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Six and 12 month PFS rates by treatment group with confidence intervals will be estimated based on Kaplan-Meier curves. The hazard ratio (HR) with confidence interval will be estimated based on stratified Cox models (stratified by levels of stratification factors), without and with adjusting for baseline clinical/pathological factors. Progression (PD) is defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. PD: Any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir). (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of 1st documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 24 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6-month PFS rate12-month PFS rate
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)76.527.5
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)41.217.6

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Disease control is defined as maintaining Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) as the tumor assessment result during the defined time window. DCR (percentage) is defined as number of patients with success of disease control divided by total number of patients in the analysis population multiplied by 100, excluding patients who refuse treatment before the initiation of any treatment. CR: Disappearance of all evidence of disease, PR: Regression of measurable disease and no new sites, PD: Any new lesion or increase by ≥50% of previously involved sites from nadir, SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR, nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the MSD (NCT02292758)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab)68.4
Arm II (Irinotecan, Cetuximab, Placebo)52.9

[back to top]

Central Nervous System (CNS) Disease Control (Cohort B)

"Central nervous system (CNS) disease control (DC) is defined as a complete response (CR); partial response (PR); or stable disease (SD). The outcome is reported as the number and percentage of participants who achieve DC, a number without dispersion.~Response criteria are as follows. Note that any lesion less than 10 mm in longest diameter (LD) is considered unchanged unless there is a ≥ 3 mm change in the sum of the LDs.~CR = Disappearance of all target lesions, sustained for ≥ 4 weeks with no new lesions; clinical condition stable or improved~PR = ≥ 30% decrease in target lesion LD and no new lesions, sustained for ≥ 4 weeks; clinical condition stable or improved~PD = Any of 20% increase in target lesion LD; increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesions; any new lesions; non-target progression; or clinical deterioration~SD = Neither PR or PD" (NCT02312622)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort B - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat SCLC0

[back to top]

Central Nervous System (CNS) Disease Control Rate (Cohort A and C)

"Central nervous system (CNS) disease control (DC) is defined as a complete response (CR); partial response (PR); or stable disease (SD). The outcome is reported as the number and percentage of participants who achieve DC, a number without dispersion.~Response criteria are as follows. Note that any lesion less than 10 mm in longest diameter (LD) is considered unchanged unless there is a ≥ 3 mm change in the sum of the LDs.~CR = Disappearance of all target lesions, sustained for ≥ 4 weeks with no new lesions; clinical condition stable or improved~PR = ≥ 30% decrease in target lesion LD and no new lesions, sustained for ≥ 4 weeks; clinical condition stable or improved~PD (progressive disease) = Any of 20% increase in target lesion LD; increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesions; any new lesions; non-target progression; or clinical deterioration~SD = Neither PR or PD" (NCT02312622)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat NSCLC2
Cohort C - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat mBC2

[back to top]

Systemic Disease Control (Cohort B)

"Systemic (ie, non-central nervous system) disease control (DC) rate by cohort is defined as the number of patients with complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD), divided by the total number of patients. The outcome will be reported as DC rate, a number without dispersion.~Response criteria are as follows. Note that any lesion < 10 mm in longest diameter (LD) is considered unchanged unless there is a ≥ 3 mm change in the sum of the LDs.~CR = Disappearance of all lesions, no new lesions; pathological lymph nodes reduced in short axis to < 10 mm~PR = ≥ 30% decrease in sum of lesion diameters; no new lesions; no progression of non-target lesions~PD = Any of 20% increase in sum of lesion diameters; progression of non-target lesions; new lesions~SD = Neither CR, PR, nor PD" (NCT02312622)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort B - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat SCLC0

[back to top]

Systemic (Non-CNS) Response Rate (Cohort A and C)

"Systemic (ie, non-central nervous system) response rate by cohort is defined as the number of participants achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), divided by the number of participants. The outcome will be reported as a number without dispersion.~Response criteria are as follows. Note that any lesion < 10 mm in longest diameter (LD) is considered unchanged unless there is a ≥ 3 mm change in the sum of the LDs.~CR = Disappearance of all target lesions, no new lesions; pathological lymph nodes reduced in short axis to < 10 mm~PR = ≥ 30% decrease in sum of lesion diameters; no new lesions; no progression of non-target lesions~PD = Any of 20% increase in sum of lesion diameters; progression of non-target lesions; new lesions~SD = Neither CR, PR, nor PD" (NCT02312622)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat NSCLC1
Cohort C - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat mBC0

[back to top]

Systemic (Non-CNS) Disease Control Rate (Cohort A and C)

"Systemic (ie, non-central nervous system) disease control (DC) rate by cohort is defined as the number of patients with complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD), divided by the total number of patients. The outcome will be reported as DC rate, a number without dispersion.~Response criteria are as follows. Note that any lesion < 10 mm in longest diameter (LD) is considered unchanged unless there is a ≥ 3 mm change in the sum of the LDs.~CR = Disappearance of all lesions, no new lesions; pathological lymph nodes reduced in short axis to < 10 mm~PR = ≥ 30% decrease in sum of lesion diameters; no new lesions; no progression of non-target lesions~PD = Any of 20% increase in sum of lesion diameters; progression of non-target lesions; new lesions~SD = Neither CR, PR, nor PD" (NCT02312622)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat NSCLC3
Cohort C - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat mBC3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Cohort A and C)

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment until disease progression or death. The outcome is reported by cohort as PFS in months, with full range. (NCT02312622)
Timeframe: Date of first dose of pegylated irinotecan NKTR 102 to date of disease progression, assessed up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort A - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat NSCLC2.66
Cohort C - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat mBC1.35

[back to top]

Overall Survival (Cohort A and C)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the period remaining alive after the start of treatment. The outcome is reported as the median with full range. (NCT02312622)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort A - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat NSCLC7.00
Cohort C - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat mBC8.49

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (Cohort A and C)

"Overall response by subject (OR) is defined as the lower assessment between the central nervous system response and the systemic response. Response is defined as either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). The outcome is reported as the number and percentage of participants who achieve OR, a number without dispersion.~Response criteria are as follows. Note that any lesion < 10 mm in longest diameter (LD) is considered unchanged unless there is a ≥ 3 mm change in the sum of the LDs.~CR = Disappearance of all lesions, sustained for ≥ 4 weeks with no new lesions; clinical condition stable or improved~PR = ≥ 30% decrease in target lesion LD & no new lesions, sustained for ≥ 4 weeks; clinical condition stable or improved~PD = Any of: 20% increase in target lesion LD; increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesions; any new lesions; non-target progression; or clinical deterioration~SD = Neither PR or PD" (NCT02312622)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat NSCLC1
Cohort C - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat mBC0

[back to top]

Overall Disease Control Rate (Cohort A and C)

"Overall disease control (DC) rate is defined as the sum in a cohort of the numbers of participants achieving complete response (CR); partial response (PR); or stable disease (SD), divided by the number of patients in that cohort. For this outcome, overall means all body systems, not just the central nervous system (CNS). The outcome is reported as DC rate, a number without dispersion.~Response criteria are as follows. Note that any lesion <10 mm in longest diameter (LD) is considered unchanged unless there is a ≥3 mm change in the sum of the LDs.~CR = Disappearance of all target lesions, sustained for ≥4 weeks with no new lesions; clinical condition stable or improved~PR = ≥30% decrease in target lesion LD & no new lesions, sustained for ≥ 4 weeks; clinical condition stable or improved~PD = Any of: 20% increase in target lesion LD; increase in T2/FLAIR non-enhancing lesions; any new lesions; non-target progression; or clinical deterioration~SD = Neither PR or PD" (NCT02312622)
Timeframe: At 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort A - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat NSCLC2
Cohort C - Pegylated Irinotecan to Treat mBC2

[back to top] [back to top]

Response Rate (RR) Using RECIST 1.1 Criteria

RR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) at any time during the study. CR = disappearance of all target lesions, PR is =>30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, progressive disease (PD) is >20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, stable disease (SD) is <30% decrease or <20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 43 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 257

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 9 Months

OS will be measured as the percentage of subjects alive at 9 months. (OS will be censored on the date the subject was last known to be alive for subjects without documentation of death at the time of analysis). Estimation based on the Kaplan-Meier curve. (Phase 2 data only) (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 9 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 257

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS will be measured (in months) from date of first dose until death or end of follow-up (OS will be censored on the date the subject was last known to be alive for subjects without documentation of death at the time of analysis). Estimation based on the Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 211.02

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Irinotecan

Dose escalation (phase I portion of the trial only) to determine the MTD in mg/m^2. (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 120

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Gemcitabine

Dose escalation (phase I portion of the trial only) to determine the MTD in mg/m^2. (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 1500

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Docetaxel

Dose escalation (phase I portion of the trial only) to determine the MTD in mg/m^2. (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 120

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cisplatin

Dose escalation (phase I portion of the trial only) to determine the MTD in mg/m^2. (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 120

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Capecitabine

Dose escalation (phase I portion of the trial only) to determine the MTD in mg for twice daily (BID) use. (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase 1500

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR) Using RECIST 1.1 Criteria

DCR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) at any time during the study. CR = disappearance of all target lesions, PR is =>30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, progressive disease (PD) is >20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, stable disease (SD) is <30% decrease or <20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 43 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 287

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Using RECIST 1.1 Criteria

PFS is defined as the number of months from the date of first dose to disease progression (progressive disease [PD] or relapse from complete response [CR] as assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria) or death due to any cause. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria, CR = disappearance of all target lesions, Partial Response (PR) is =>30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, Progressive Disease (PD) is >20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, Stable Disease (SD) is <30% decrease or <20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. Estimation based on the Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT02324543)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 28.34

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLT was defined using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 and included: any drug-related hematologic toxicity ≥Grade 4 with the exception of Grade 4 neutropenia <7 days duration; Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia with fever >38.5 degrees Celsius and/or infection or neutropenia requiring colony-stimulating factor OR non-hematologic DLTs that were any Grade 3, 4, or 5 toxicity with the following exceptions: Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and dehydration occurring in a setting of inadequate treatment; inadequately treated hypersensitivity reactions; Grade 3 elevated transaminases or urine electrolyte abnormality ≤1 week in duration; Grade 3 serum electrolyte abnormality ≤72 hours in duration. DLTs also included: drug-related adverse experience that lead to a dose modification; unresolved drug-related toxicity resulted in delay in initiation of Cycle 2. (NCT02327169)
Timeframe: From Day 1, Cycle 1 through 30 days after the last dose in Cycle 1 (up to 8 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
MLN2480 100 mg + MLN0128 2 mg1
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 30 mg0
MLN2480 160 mg + Alisertib 30 mg0
MLN2480 200 mg + Alisertib 30 mg0
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 40 mg1
MLN2480 100 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^20
MLN2480 160 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^20
MLN2480 200 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^20
MLN2480 400 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^21
MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^21
MLN2480 400 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^20
MLN2480 600 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^21
ML2480 300 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^20
ML2480 400 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^21
Dose Expansion: MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^21

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all target lesions, non-target lesions, no new lesions, and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, no progression in non-target lesion, and no new lesions. (NCT02327169)
Timeframe: Baseline then every 2 cycles beginning at Cycle 2, Day 27, until disease progression, death or end of study (Up to 13 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MLN2480 100 mg + MLN0128 2 mg0
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 30 mg0
MLN2480 160 mg + Alisertib 30 mg0
MLN2480 200 mg + Alisertib 30 mg0
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 40 mg17
MLN2480 100 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^275
MLN2480 160 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^20
MLN2480 200 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^20
MLN2480 400 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^240
MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^217
MLN2480 400 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^20
MLN2480 600 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^20
ML2480 300 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^20
ML2480 400 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^20
Dose Expansion: MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^238

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time in months from the date of first study drug administration to the date of first documented PD or death due to any cause. PD was based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST V1.1), defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (NCT02327169)
Timeframe: Baseline then every 2 cycles beginning at Cycle 2, Day 27, until disease progression, death or end of study (Approximately up to 13 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
MLN2480 100 mg + MLN0128 2 mg0.5
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 30 mg1.9
MLN2480 160 mg + Alisertib 30 mg3.7
MLN2480 200 mg + Alisertib 30 mg1.9
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 40 mg9.5
MLN2480 100 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^25.3
MLN2480 160 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^25.5
MLN2480 200 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^22.9
MLN2480 400 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^27.6
MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^23.3
MLN2480 400 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^22.2
MLN2480 600 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^21.7
ML2480 300 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^23.6
ML2480 400 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^24.7
Dose Expansion: MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^25.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the time in months from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of a PR or better response. (NCT02327169)
Timeframe: From date of enrollment to the date of the first documentation of a confirmed response (Up to 13 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 40 mg4.2
MLN2480 100 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^23.7
MLN2480 400 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^22.7
MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^21.8
Dose Expansion: MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^21.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product; the untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE means any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires in patient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. (NCT02327169)
Timeframe: From Day 1, Cycle 1 through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 13 months)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsSAEs
Dose Expansion: MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^2107
ML2480 300 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^210
ML2480 400 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^274
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 30 mg31
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 40 mg83
MLN2480 100 mg + MLN0128 2 mg42
MLN2480 100 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^241
MLN2480 160 mg + Alisertib 30 mg75
MLN2480 160 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^231
MLN2480 200 mg + Alisertib 30 mg31
MLN2480 200 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^242
MLN2480 400 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^262
MLN2480 400 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^263
MLN2480 600 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^273
MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^284

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of Response (DOR) was defined as the time in months from the first documented CR or PR per RECIST v. 1.1 to disease recurrence or disease progression (PD) whichever occurs first. (NCT02327169)
Timeframe: From first documented response until disease progression (Up to 13 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 40 mgNA
MLN2480 100 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^23.7
MLN2480 400 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^26.5
MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^23.5
Dose Expansion: MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^211.5

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for MLN2480

(NCT02327169)
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 up to 28 days

Interventionmg (Number)
MLN2480 100 mg + MLN0128 2 mgNA
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 30 mgNA
MLN2480 160 mg + Alisertib 30 mgNA
MLN2480 200 mg + Alisertib 30 mgNA
MLN2480 100 mg + Alisertib 40 mgNA
MLN2480 100 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^2NA
MLN2480 160 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^2NA
MLN2480 200 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^2NA
MLN2480 400 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^2NA
MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^2600
MLN2480 400 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2NA
MLN2480 600 mg + Cetuximab 250 mg/m^2NA
ML2480 300 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^2NA
ML2480 400 mg + Irinotecan 180 mg/m^2NA
Dose Expansion: MLN2480 600 mg + Paclitaxel 80 mg/m^2NA

[back to top]

The Number of Patients With Tumor Size Reduction (Objective Response Rate)

Objective response rate is the sum of partial responses plus complete responses and will be assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT02358863)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Chemotherapy0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or death resulting from any cause, whichever comes first. Progression is defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. The median and 95% confidence intervals are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. (NCT02485834)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Randomized PatientsNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from date of randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02485834)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Randomized PatientsNA

[back to top]

Number of Patients Had Pathologic Complete Response

The number of patients had pathologic complete response (pCR). (pCR is defined as no gross or microscopic tumor identified with the surgical specimen. All lymph nodes should be free of tumor to document a PCR. If no gross tumor is visible, section around the area of inflammation (nodularity) should be made every 2-3 cm and specimens examined.) (NCT02485834)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Randomized Patients4

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieved R0 Resection During Surgery

The number of patients achieved R0 resection during surgery (NCT02485834)
Timeframe: At time of surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Randomized Patients3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reported Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

The number of patients who reported grade 3 or higher Adverse Events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. (NCT02485834)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after completion of protocol treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Randomized Patients3

[back to top]

4-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate

PFS is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first. Will be estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including baseline sum), or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT02508077)
Timeframe: At 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Panitumumab and FOLFIRI)0

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the event of disease recurrence/progression defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause. To determine the progression free survival of subjects dosed with Vigil immunotherapy in combination with irinotecan and temozolomide. (NCT02511132)
Timeframe: Estimated median 1.3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1: Vigil Alone5
Part 1: Gemicitabine and Docetaxel6
Part 2: Vigil in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

OS is defined as time from randomization to death or to the date of last follow-up. The date of last follow-up confirming survival will be used as the censoring date for subjects who are alive and/or do not have a known date of death. (NCT02511132)
Timeframe: Estimated median 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1: Vigil Alone3
Part 1: Gemcitabine and Docetaxel6
Part 2: Vigil in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events Determined by Laboratory Assessments and Physical Examinations

"To determine safety profile of Vigil immunotherapy in combination with irinotecan and temozolomide with 30 days of last dose in patients with metastatic Ewing's sarcoma refractory or intolerant to at least 1 prior line of systemic chemotherapy.~• To determine safety profile of Vigil immunotherapy in combination with irinotecan and temozolimidetemozolomide in patients with metastatic Ewing's sarcoma refractory or intolerant to at least 1 prior line of systemic chemotherapy." (NCT02511132)
Timeframe: 30 days of last treatment dosing

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1: Vigil Alone5
Part 1: Gemcitabine and Docetaxel6
Part 2: Vigil in Combination With Temozolomide and Irinotecan9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is the length of time between protocol registration and patient death (NCT02562716)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years for the estimates of median overall survival. Up to 2 years for Statistical Analysis 1 and 2, comparing the observed 2-year overall survival (OS) to the null hypothesis of 40%, in each arm.

InterventionMonths (Median)
mFOLFIRINOX ->Surg ->mFOLFIRINOX23.2
Gem/Nab-P ->Surg ->Gem/Nab-P23.6

[back to top]

Number of Patients Going to Surgery for Resection After Preoperative Chemotherapy.

(NCT02562716)
Timeframe: Up to 8 months post registration (and within 4 to 8 weeks after the last dose of Cycle 3 preoperative chemotherapy).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
mFOLFIRINOX ->Surg ->mFOLFIRINOX40
Gem/Nab-P ->Surg ->Gem/Nab-P33

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Response Following Preoperative Chemotherapy, Including Confirmed and Unconfirmed, Complete and Partial Response, Per RECIST 1.1.

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT02562716)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months post registration (and within 2 to 4 weeks after the last dose of Cycle 3 preoperative chemotherapy.).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
mFOLFIRINOX ->Surg ->mFOLFIRINOX5
Gem/Nab-P ->Surg ->Gem/Nab-P10

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival From the Time of R0 or R1 Resection.

Disease-free survival (DFS) is calculated for patients who undergo surgical resection (R0/R1). DFS will be measured from the date of surgical resection to date of first documentation of recurrence (loco-regional or distant) or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive and free of disease will be censored at date of last contact. (NCT02562716)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
mFOLFIRINOX ->Surg ->mFOLFIRINOX10.9
Gem/Nab-P ->Surg ->Gem/Nab-P14.2

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving R0 Resection After Preoperative Chemotherapy.

R0 resection classification is defined as macroscopically complete tumor removal with negative microscopic surgical margins (bile duct, pancreatic parenchyma, and superior mesenteric artery margins). (NCT02562716)
Timeframe: Up to 8 months post registration (and within 4 to 8 weeks after the last dose of Cycle 3 preoperative chemotherapy).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
mFOLFIRINOX ->Surg ->mFOLFIRINOX34
Gem/Nab-P ->Surg ->Gem/Nab-P28

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Median OS in participants with SCC of the esophagus is presented. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 15-Oct-2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab8.2
Chemotherapy7.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesions was also considered PD. Median PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review per RECIST 1.1 is presented for participants with SCC of the esophagus. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 15-Oct-2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab2.2
Chemotherapy3.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in All Participants

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesions was also considered PD. Median PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review per RECIST 1.1 in all participants is presented. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 15-Oct-2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab2.1
Chemotherapy3.4

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesions was also considered PD. Median PFS as assessed by blinded independent central review per RECIST 1.1 is presented for participants with a PD-L1 CPS ≥10. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 15-Oct-2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab2.6
Chemotherapy3.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 14-Mar-2022 (up to approximately 6 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pembrolizumab40
Chemotherapy42

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product was also an AE. The number of participants who experienced ≥1 AE is presented. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 14-Mar-2022 (up to approximately 6 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pembrolizumab301
Chemotherapy288

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in All Participants

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1. The percentage of all participants who experienced a CR or PR is presented. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 15-Oct-2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab13.1
Chemotherapy6.7

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1. The percentage of participants with a PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who experienced a CR or PR is presented. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 15-Oct-2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab21.5
Chemotherapy6.1

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1. The percentage of participants with SCC of the esophagus who experienced a CR or PR is presented. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 15-Oct-2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab16.7
Chemotherapy7.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in All Participants

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Median OS in all participants is presented. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 15-Oct-2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab7.1
Chemotherapy7.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Median OS in participants with a PD-L1 CPS ≥10 is presented. (NCT02564263)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 15-Oct-2018 (up to approximately 34 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab9.3
Chemotherapy6.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Nature, Severity, and Occurrence Measured From Baseline to End of Trial Participation, as Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (Version 4.03) (CTCAE v4.03).

AEs were coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification. The incidence and type of AEs (e.g., treatment-emergent AE [TEAE]) were summarized according to MedDRA system organ classes and preferred terms. An AE was considered as treatment-emergent if it occurred after the first treatment administration. (NCT02568046)
Timeframe: 15 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
At least 1 TEAEAt least 1 Serious TEAEAt least 1 Serious TEAE related to Sym004 onlyAt least 1 TEAE leading to Sym004 dose reductionAt least 1 TEAE leading to interruption of Sym004At least 1 TEAE leading to Sym004 withdrawalAt least 1 TEAE leading to FOLFIRI withdrawalAt least 1 TEAE leading to trial terminationAt least 1 TEAE related to Sym004 + FOLFIRIAt least 1 TEAE related to Sym004 onlyAt least 1 TEAE related to FOLFIRI onlyAt least 1 TEAE Grade ≥3 related to Sym004+FOLFIRIAt least 1 TEAE Grade ≥ 3 related to Sym004 onlyAt least 1 TEAE Grade ≥ 3 related to FOLFIRI onlyAt least 1 dermatologic toxicityAt least 1 TEAE of hypomagnesaemiaAt least 1 Infusion related reaction TEAEAt least 1 TEAE resulting in death
Dose Level -1: Sym004 9 mg/kg + FOLFIRI520252213542215030
Dose Level 1: Sym004 12 mg/kg + FOLFIRI530132104442013330

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. (NCT02582970)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy100

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival Time

Progression-free survival was defined as the duration from the date of starting first-line therapy to the date of documented disease progression or death from any cause. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the disease measurement, taking as reference the smallest disease measurement recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or evidence of clinical progression and unequivocal progression of existing non-TL. Progression-free survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT02582970)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy12.2

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Survival

Duration of survival was defined as the time period from the start of first line therapy to death. Duration of survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT02582970)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy23.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Best Overall Response

The best overall response was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). Progressive disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the disease measurement, taking as reference the smallest disease measurement recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or evidence of clinical progression and unequivocal progression of existing non-TL. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all TL and non-TL. If immunocytology was available, no disease was to be detected by that methodology. Partial response (PR): at least a 30% decrease in the disease measurement, taking as reference the disease measurement done to confirm measurable disease at study entry. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or increase to qualify for PD. (NCT02582970)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPRPDSDMissing
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy219892

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Died

(NCT02582970)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy62.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death

Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the disease measurement, taking as reference the smallest disease measurement recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or evidence of clinical progression and unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions (TL). (NCT02582970)
Timeframe: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bevacizumab + Chemotherapy85.0

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Descriptive statistics (point and exact 90% confidence interval estimates from the resultant Kaplan-Meier curve) will be generated for OS. The median OS will be estimated on an intention-to-treat basis (using all registered patients), and on a response-evaluable basis (using all patients who completed all BAT infusions) using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02620865)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months

Interventionyears (Median)
Treatment (Anti-CD3 x Anti-EGFR BATs)0.934

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Descriptive statistics (point and exact 90% confidence interval estimates from the resultant Kaplan-Meier curve) will be generated for PFS. The median PFS will be estimated on an intention-to-treat basis (using all registered patients), and on a response-evaluable basis (using all patients who completed all BAT infusions) using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02620865)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months

InterventionYears (Median)
Treatment (Anti-CD3 x Anti-EGFR BATs)0.934

[back to top]

Incidence of Toxicity (CTCAE Version 4.0)

Toxicity rates will be estimated using all treated patients. (NCT02620865)
Timeframe: Up to 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AnorexiaAnxietyChillsDepressionDiarrheaDizzinessDry MouthFatigueFeverGastroesophageal reflux diseaseHeadacheMyalgiaNauseaRash maculo-papularVomiting
Treatment (Anti-CD3 x Anti-EGFR BATs)112121122121221

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

The PFS time was defined as the time from date of randomization until date of the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause (whichever occurs first). PFS was assessed as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. (NCT02625623)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 627 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Physician Choice Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)2.7
Avelumab + BSC1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Scale Score at End of Treatment (EOT)

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. It consisted of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial impact. The EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL score ranges from 0 to 100; High score indicates better GHS/QoL. Score 0 represents: very poor physical condition and QoL. Score 100 represents: excellent overall physical condition and QoL. (NCT02625623)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 66)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physician Choice Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)-10.14
Avelumab + BSC-15.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire Through Composite Index Score at End of Treatment (EOT)

EQ-5D-5L is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive overall composite health state index score, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1. A higher score indicates better health state. (NCT02625623)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 66)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physician Choice Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)-0.103
Avelumab + BSC-0.144

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Health Outcome Questionnaire Through Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at End of Treatment (EOT)

EQ-5D-5L is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive overall score using a visual analog scale (VAS) that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine. (NCT02625623)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 66)

Interventionmillimeter (mm) (Mean)
Physician Choice Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)-12.3
Avelumab + BSC-13.6

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR defined as the percentage of all randomized participants with a confirmed best overall response (BOR) of partial response (PR),or complete response (CR) according to RECIST v1.1 and as adjudicated by the Independent Review Committee (IRC). CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30 percent (%) reduction from baseline in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. (NCT02625623)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 627 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Physician Choice Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)4.3
Avelumab + SC2.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. For participants who were still alive at the time of data analysis or who were lost to follow-up, OS time was censored at the date of last contact. OS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. (NCT02625623)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 627 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Physician Choice Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)5.0
Avelumab + BSC4.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach Cancer Specific (EORTC QLQ-STO22) Questionnaire Scores at End of Treatment (EOT)

The EORTC QLQ-STO22 supplements the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess symptoms and treatment-related side effects commonly reported in participants. There are 22 questions which comprise 5 scales (dysphagia, pain, reflux symptom, dietary restrictions, and anxiety) and 4 single items (dry mouth, hair loss, taste, body image). Most questions use 4-point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 1 question was a yes or no answer). A linear transformation was used to standardize all scores and single-items to a scale of 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. (NCT02625623)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT (up to Week 66)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
DysphagiaPainRefluxEating RestrictionsAnxietyDry MouthTastingBody ImageHair Loss
Avelumab + BSC15.329.237.9613.296.619.012.254.05-13.96
Physician Choice Chemotherapy + Best Supportive Care (BSC)7.258.884.599.247.4915.949.425.074.71

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part A

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) data of Olaratumab was reported from available sample data. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 8 and Cycle 2, Days 1 and 8: 1.25 hour (h), 2.5 h, 3.5h Postdose

Interventionmicrogram/milliliter (μg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 8
Olaratumab Alone (Part A)439

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part A

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) data of Olaratumab was reported from available sample data. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 8 and Cycle 2, Days 1 and 8: 1.25 hour (h), 2.5 h, 3.5h Postdose

,,
Interventionmicrogram/milliliter (μg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 2, Day 8
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part A)406422
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part A)396398
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part A)437523

[back to top]

PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part B

PK: Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) data of Olaratumab was reported from available sample data. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 8 and Cycle 2, Days 1 and 8: 1.25 hour (h), 2.5 h, 3.5h Postdose

Interventionmicrogram/milliliter (μg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 8
Olaratumab Alone (Part B)639

[back to top]

PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part C

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) data of Olaratumab was reported from available sample data. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 8; Cycle 2, Days 1 and 8: 1.25 hour (h), 2.5 h, 3.5h Postdose

Interventionmicrogram/milliliter (μg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 8
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part C)502

[back to top]

PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part C

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) data of Olaratumab was reported from available sample data. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 8; Cycle 2, Days 1 and 8: 1.25 hour (h), 2.5 h, 3.5h Postdose

Interventionmicrogram/milliliter (μg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 8
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin Cycle 1 (Part C)406493

[back to top]

PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part A

PK: Trough serum concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab was reported. A sample was collected every other cycle from cycles 1, 2, 3-25. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 2, 3-25; Day 8: 336 Hours Postdose

Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 8
Olaratumab Alone (Part A)73

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Olaratumab Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as an adverse event (AE) during the first 21 days that was possibly related to the study drug and fulfilled any of the following criteria using the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0: CTCAE Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, grade 4 neutropenia that lasted longer than 2 weeks, grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia complicated by hemorrhage, and any hematologic toxicity that caused a cycle delay of >14 days. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Parts A and B: Cycle 1 through Cycle 2 in each arm (21-day cycle); Part C: Cycle 1 only (21-day cycle)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part A)0
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part A)1
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part A)0
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part B)1
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part B)0
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part B)1
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part C)1
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part C)0
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part C)0

[back to top]

PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part C

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) data of Olaratumab was reported from available sample data. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 8; Cycle 2, Days 1 and 8: 1.25 hour (h), 2.5 h, 3.5h Postdose

,
Interventionmicrogram/milliliter (μg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 1Cycle 1, Day 8Cycle 2, Day 8
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part C)363498567
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part C)548695707

[back to top]

PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part B

PK: Trough serum concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab was reported. A sample was collected every other cycle from cycles 1, 2, 3-25. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 2, 3-25; Day 8: 336 Hours Postdose

,
Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 8Cycle 2, Day 8Cycle 3-25, Day 8
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part B)125199289
Olaratumab +Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part B)99.1230348

[back to top]

PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part C

PK: Trough serum concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab was reported. A sample was collected every other cycle from cycles 1, 2, 3-25. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 2, 3-25; Day 8: 336 Hours Postdose

,,
Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 8Cycle 2, Day 8Cycle 3-25, Day 8
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part C)90.3141156
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part C)124NANA
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part C)83.713483.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Objective Response Rate [ORR])

Objective Response Rate (ORR) is the percentage of participants achieving a confirmed best overall tumor response of CR or PR. According to RECIST v1.1, PR defined as a >30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters (LD) of the target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the LD; CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Baseline to objective progression or start of new anti-cancer therapy (Up to 7 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part A)0
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part A)0
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part A)9.1
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part B)20.0
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part B)0
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part B)0
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part C)0
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part C)0
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part C)25.0

[back to top]

PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Olaratumab Part B

PK: Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) data of Olaratumab was reported from available sample data. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 8 and Cycle 2, Days 1 and 8: 1.25 hour (h), 2.5 h, 3.5h Postdose

,
Interventionmicrogram/milliliter (μg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 1Cycle 2, Day 8
Olaratumab +Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part B)585647
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part B)629696

[back to top]

PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part A

PK: Trough serum concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab was reported. A sample was collected every other cycle from cycles 1, 2, 3-25. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 2, 3-25; Day 8: 336 Hours Postdose

Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 2, Day 8Cycle 3-25, Day 8
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part A)38.594.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent (TE) Positive Anti-Olaratumab Antibodies

Percentage of participants with a TE positive anti-olaratumab antibodies defined as a participant with a 4-fold (2 dilutions) increase over a positive baseline antibody titer. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Study Completion (Up to 33 Months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part A)0
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part A)0
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part A)0
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part B)0
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part B)0
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part B)0
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part C)0
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part C)0
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part C)0

[back to top]

PK: Trough Serum Minimum Concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab Part A

PK: Trough serum concentration (Cmin) of Olaratumab was reported. A sample was collected every other cycle from cycles 1, 2, 3-25. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Cycles 1, 2, 3-25; Day 8: 336 Hours Postdose

,
Interventionμg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1, Day 8Cycle 2, Day 8Cycle 3-25, Day 8
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part A)46.311488.2
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part A)97.837.795.1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from baseline to the first date of radiological disease progression or death due to any cause. Progressive disease (PD) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (including the baseline sum if that is the smallest). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression. If participant started new treatment before PD, the participant was censored at the date of last tumor assessment prior to new therapy. If treatment was discontinued for reasons other than PD and no further assessment, censoring occurred at last tumor assessment. (NCT02677116)
Timeframe: Baseline to radiological disease progression or death from any cause (Up to 2 Years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part A)1.54
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part A)1.38
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part A)1.26
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part B)1.28
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part B)1.25
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part B)NA
Olaratumab + Vincristine + Irinotecan (Part C)4.07
Olaratumab + Ifosfamide (Part C)4.88
Olaratumab + Doxorubicin (Part C)5.52

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first objective documentation of disease progression per RECIST 1.1 (PD) or death, whichever comes first. (NCT02753127)
Timeframe: Randomization to Date of Death or until the date of first documented objective disease progression or database cutoff date (28 Apr 2020) (Approximately 43 months)

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS), General Population(GP)Progression-Free Survival (PFS) , ITT-pSTAT3(+)
FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab5.625.55
Napabucasin + FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab5.555.39

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the proportion of patients with a documented complete response and partial response (CR + PR) based on RECIST 1.1. The primary estimate for ORR will be based on patients with measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 at randomization. (NCT02753127)
Timeframe: Randomization to Date of Death or until the date of first documented objective disease progression or database cutoff date (28 Apr 2020) (Approximately 43 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Objective Response Rate (ORR), General Population(GP)Objective Response Rate (ORR), ITT-pSTAT3(+)
FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab14.613.9
Napabucasin + FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab13.811.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events in the General Population

All patients who have received at least one dose of either BBI-608 or FOLFIRI will be included in the safety analysis according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.0. The incidence of adverse events will be summarized by type of adverse event and severity. (NCT02753127)
Timeframe: All adverse event are collected from date of signed informed consent until 30 days after protocol treatment discontinuation. Outcome followed until study discontinuation up to 4 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of Patients with Adverse Events in the General PopulationNumber of Patients with Adverse Events in the pSTAT3(+) Subpopulation
FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab602266
Napabucasin + FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab619275

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for Global Health Status at Time 2 (Cycle 5 Day 1) and Time 4 (Cycle 9 Day 1).

The Quality of Life (QoL) of patients will be assessed using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) (EORTC QLQ-30) while the patient remains on study treatment (FOLFIRI with or without BBI-608). EORTC QLQ-30 is used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients using 28 questions with a 4 point scale. (1 'Not at all' to 4'Very Much'); 2 questions use a 7-point sale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher overall score = better quality of life. (NCT02753127)
Timeframe: From baseline at Time 2 (Cycle 5 Day 1), approximately 57 days and Time 4 (Cycle 9 Day 1), approximately 113 days

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Mean Change From Baseline for Global Health status at Time 2 (Cycle 5 Day 1). General PopulationMean Change From Baseline for Global Health status at Time 4 (Cycle 9 Day 1). General Population
FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab-5.45-5.58
Napabucasin + FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab-7.07-7.70

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for Physical Functioning Status at Time 2 (Cycle 5 Day 1) and Time 4 (Cycle 9 Day 1).

The Quality of Life (QoL) of patients will be assessed using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) (EORTC QLQ-30) while the patient remains on study treatment (FOLFIRI with or without BBI-608). EORTC QLQ-30 is used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients using 28 questions with a 4 point scale. (1 'Not at all' to 4'Very Much'); 2 questions use a 7-point sale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores are averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher overall score = better quality of life. (NCT02753127)
Timeframe: From baseline at Time 2 (Cycle 5 Day 1) and Time 4 (Cycle 9 Day 1)

,
InterventionQOL score on a scale (Mean)
Mean Change From Baseline for Physical Functioning at Time 2 (Cycle 5 Day 1). General PopulationMean Change From Baseline for Physical Functioning at Time 4 (Cycle 9 Day 1). General Population
FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab-3.94-4.22
Napabucasin + FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab-5.86-6.37

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR is defined as the percentage of patients with a documented complete response, partial response, and stable disease (CR + PR + SD) based on RECIST 1.1. The primary estimate of DCR will be based on patients with measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 at randomization (NCT02753127)
Timeframe: Randomization to Date of Death or until the date of first documented objective disease progression or database cutoff date (28 Apr 2020) (Approximately 43 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Disease Control Rate (DCR), General Population(GP)Disease Control Rate (DCR), ITT-pSTAT3(+)
FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab69.170.3
Napabucasin + FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab69.667.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause.~Patients who are alive at the time of the interim or the final analyses or who have become lost to follow-up will be censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive." (NCT02753127)
Timeframe: Randomization to Date of Death from any cause or database cutoff date (28 Apr 2020) (Approximately 43 months)

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
Overall Survival (OS), General Population(GP)Overall Survival (OS), ITT-pSTAT3(+)
FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab13.8312.12
Napabucasin + FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab14.2913.17

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate

Disease control rate (DCR) is defined as the proportion of participants who have a confirmed and unconfirmed, partial, complete or stable response to therapy. (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post registration

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)0.32
Arm II (FOLFIRI)0.47

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

"DoR: time from date of first documentation of response (complete response, CR, or partial response, PR) to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause among participants, who achieve a response (CR or PR).~The distribution of DoR in each treatment arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)3.4
Arm II (FOLFIRI)5.1

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate, ORR

Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants who have a confirmed and unconfirmed, partial or complete response to therapy. (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post registration

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)0.09
Arm II (FOLFIRI)0.10

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"OS: time to death by any cause from randomized treatment arm assignment.~The log-rank test with stratification was used by prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Distributions of overall survival in arms 1 and 2 were estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier." (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)5.4
Arm II (FOLFIRI)6.5

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause. Patients last known to be alive without report of progression are censored at date of last contact. (NCT02890355)
Timeframe: From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Veliparib and mFOLFIRI)2.1
Arm II (FOLFIRI)2.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Change in Quality of Life as Defined by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30

Change in quality of life over the six measurement times will be modeled using mixed effects linear regression to account for correlation among repeated measurements from the same subjects. Average change in QoL from baseline to follow-up will be computed. (NCT02896907)
Timeframe: Baseline to up to 28 days after the last treatment

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Treatment (FOLFIRINOX, Ascorbic Acid)NA

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm26.1
Phase 3: Doublet Arm15.9

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm26.1
Phase 3: Doublet Arm20.4

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm26.1
Phase 3:Control Arm3.7

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm15.9
Phase 3:Control Arm3.7

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm20.4
Phase 3:Control Arm1.9

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by Investigator

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.80
Phase 3:Doublet Arm5.70

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by BICR

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.80
Phase 3:Doublet Arm6.06

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented disease progression (PD) or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.80
Phase 3:Control Arm5.75

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.80
Phase 3:Control ArmNA

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm5.70
Phase 3:Control Arm5.75

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm6.06
Phase 3:Control ArmNA

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Cetuximab

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in3.773.05

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Encorafenib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in2.002.00

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in2.001.58

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Final Analysis

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants according to incidence of dose interruptions, dose modifications and dose discontinuations due to AEs were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose interruptionsDose modificationsDiscontinuation due to AEs
Combined Safety Lead-in30168

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Hematology and Coagulation Laboratory Parameters

Clinically notable shifts was defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to more than or equal to (>=) Grade 3 based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life threatening and Grade 5: death. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time - HyperHemoglobin - HyperHemoglobin - HypoLeukocytes - HyperLeukocytes - HypoLymphocytes - HyperLymphocytes - HypoNeutrophils - HypoPlatelets - HypoProthrombin Intl. Normalized Ratio - Hyper
Phase 3: Doublet Arm903009347852
Phase 3: Triplet Arm9097021225413
Phase 3:Control Arm40170514576542

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters

Clinically notable shifts was defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to >= Grade 3 based on CTCAE version 4.03 where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life threatening and Grade 5: death. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alanine Aminotransferase - HyperAlbumin - HypoAlkaline Phosphatase - HyperAspartate Aminotransferase - HyperBilirubin - HyperCalcium - HyperCalcium - HypoCreatine Kinase - HyperCreatinine - HyperGlucose - HyperGlucose - HypoMagnesium - HyperMagnesium - HypoPotassium - HyperPotassium - HypoSodium - HyperSodium - HypoTroponin I - HyperUrate - Hyper
Phase 3: Control Arm10171891207364129592501
Phase 3: Doublet Arm7161271308111160141071402
Phase 3: Triplet Arm115013111111518458401114511004

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

Newly occurring clinically notable changes was defined as participants not meeting the criterion at baseline and meeting criterion post-baseline. The criterion included: heart rate- decrease from baseline > 25% and to a value < 50 and increase from baseline > 25% and to a value > 100. QT interval- new > 450 (millisecond) msec, new > 480 msec, new > 500 msec, increase from baseline > 30 msec and increase from baseline > 60 msec. QTcF- new > 450 msec, new > 480 msec, new > 500 msec, increase from baseline > 30 msec and increase from baseline > 60 msec. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Heart Rate - Decrease from baseline > 25% and to a value < 50Heart Rate - Increase from baseline > 25% and to a value > 100QT Interval - New > 450 millisecond (msec)QT Interval - New > 480 msecQT Interval - New > 500 msecQT Interval - increase from baseline > 30 msecQT Interval - increase from baseline > 60 msecQTcF - New > 450 msecQTcF - New > 480 msecQTcF - New > 500 msecQTcF - increase from baseline > 30 msecQTcF - increase from baseline > 60 msec
Phase 3: Control Arm02872032102352245
Phase 3: Doublet Arm42430759921511867520
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1271743972239915912

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Clinically Notable Vital Sign Abnormalities

Newly occurring clinically notable changes was defined as participants not meeting the criterion at baseline and meeting criterion post-baseline. The criterion included: low/high systolic blood pressure (SBP): <= 90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) with decrease from baseline of >= 20mmHg or >= 160mmHg with increase from baseline of >= 20mmHg, low or high diastolic blood pressure (DBP): <= 50mmHg with decrease from baseline of >= 15mmHg or >= 100mmHg with increase from baseline of >= 15mmHg, low or high pulse: <= 50 beats/min with decrease from baseline of >= 15 beats/min or >= 120 beats/min with increase from baseline of >= 15 beats/min, low or high temperature: <= 36 degree Celsius (deg C) or >= 37.5 deg C. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Diastolic Blood Pressure - HighDiastolic Blood Pressure - LowPulse Rate - HighPulse Rate - LowSystolic Blood Pressure - HighSystolic Blood Pressure - LowTemperature - HighTemperature - Low
Phase 3: Control Arm752035102555
Phase 3: Doublet Arm62714413282384
Phase 3: Triplet Arm82123319373393

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shift in Visual Acuity Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) Score

Visual acuity was measured using the Snellen visual acuity conversion chart. This was determined by establishing the smallest optotypes that could be identified correctly by the participant at a given observation distance. Snellen visual acuity was reported as a Snellen fraction (m/M) in which the numerator (m) indicated the test distance and the denominator (M) indicated the distance at which the gap of the equivalent Landolt ring subtends 1 minute of arc. The LogMAR score was calculated as - log(m/M). The maximum increase in score of <= 0, 0 to < 0.1, 0.1 to < 0.2, 0.2 to < 0.3 and >=0.3 relative to baseline in LogMAR were reported in this endpoint. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline <=0 to >0-<0.1Baseline <=0 to 0.1-<0.2Baseline <=0 to 0.2-<0.3Baseline <=0 to >=0.3Baseline <=0 to missing scoreBaseline >0-<0.1 to <=0Baseline >0-<0.1 to 0.1-<0.2Baseline >0-<0.1 to 0.2-<0.3Baseline >0-<0.1 to >=0.3Baseline >0-<0.1 to missing scoreBaseline 0.1-<0.2 to <=0Baseline 0.1-<0.2 to >0-<0.1Baseline 0.2-<0.3 to <=0Baseline 0.2-<0.3 to >0-<0.1Baseline 0.2-<0.3 to 0.1-<0.2Baseline 0.2-<0.3 to missing scoreBaseline >=0.3 to <=0Baseline >=0.3 to >0-<0.1Baseline >=0.3 to 0.1-<0.2Baseline >=0.3 to 0.2-<0.3Baseline >=0.3 to missing scoreBaseline 0.1-<0.2 to 0.2-<0.3Baseline 0.1-<0.2 to missing score
Phase 3: Control Arm000012900003000000500001307
Phase 3: Doublet Arm83018662102510001420101939
Phase 3: Triplet Arm33154691774335113319412100

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Shifts in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) From Baseline to Maximum Grade On-treatment

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) abnormalities were defined according to CTCAE version 4.03 where Grade 0: Non-missing value below Grade 2, Grade 2: LVEF between 40% and 50% or absolute change from baseline between -10% and < -20%, Grade 3: LVEF between 20% and 39% or absolute change from baseline <= -20%, Grade 4: LVEF lower than 20%. Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values showing any shift in Grade from baseline to 1 day after dose 1 (post-baseline) were reported. Participants whose grade category was unchanged (e.g. Grade 0 to Grade 0) were not reported. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Grade 0 to Grade 2 post baselineBaseline Grade 0 to Grade 3 post baselineBaseline Grade 0 to missing gradeBaseline Grade 2 to missing gradeBaseline missing grade to Grade 0 post baseline
Phase 3: Control Arm0018620
Phase 3: Doublet Arm0120530
Phase 3: Triplet Arm2711701

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Binimetinib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in1.981.04

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in59.920.5

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Encorafenib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in33602490

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Cetuximab

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in195000199000

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Binimetinib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in654524

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter *hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in20670.0

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Encorafenib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter *hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in113006660

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Cetuximab

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter *hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in841000970000

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Zero to the Last Measurable Time Point (AUClast) for Binimetinib

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionNanogram/milliliter *hour (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2
Combined Safety Lead-in19601540

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

"The PGIC is a measure of participant's perceptions of change in their symptoms over time that can be used as an anchoring method to determine the minimal clinically important difference for other participant reported outcome (PROs). For this assessment, participants answered the following question: Since starting treatment, my colorectal cancer symptoms are: (1) very much improved, (2) much improved, (3) minimally improved, (4) no change, (5) minimally worse, (6) much worse or (7) very much worse." (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at Cycle 22 Day 1Change at Cycle 23 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Doublet Arm3.80.1-0.8-1.2-1.1-1.1-1.2-1.0-1.1-0.9-0.6-1.1-0.8-0.9-1.5-1.6-0.7-1.0-1.0-0.5-2.0-2.0-2.0-2.00.10.5

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

"The PGIC is a measure of participant's perceptions of change in their symptoms over time that can be used as an anchoring method to determine the minimal clinically important difference for other participant reported outcome (PROs). For this assessment, participants answered the following question: Since starting treatment, my colorectal cancer symptoms are: (1) very much improved, (2) much improved, (3) minimally improved, (4) no change, (5) minimally worse, (6) much worse or (7) very much worse." (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3: Triplet Arm3.8-0.1-0.7-0.9-0.9-0.9-0.8-1.1-1.2-0.8-0.5-0.9-0.9-1.3-1.1-1.2-2.0-1.3-2.0-3.0-3.0-3.00.3-0.1

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

"The PGIC is a measure of participant's perceptions of change in their symptoms over time that can be used as an anchoring method to determine the minimal clinically important difference for other participant reported outcome (PROs). For this assessment, participants answered the following question: Since starting treatment, my colorectal cancer symptoms are: (1) very much improved, (2) much improved, (3) minimally improved, (4) no change, (5) minimally worse, (6) much worse or (7) very much worse." (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Control Arm3.90.0-0.3-0.5-0.5-0.7-0.8-1.1-1.0-1.0-0.30.0-0.5-1.00.40.7

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

FACT-C= Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), which assessed HRQoL of cancer participants & participants with other chronic illnesses. It consists of total 36 items (27 items of general version of FACT-C and disease-specific subscale containing 9 CRC-specific items), summarized to 5 subscales: physical well-being (7 items), functional well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items); all 3 subscales range:0-28, emotional well-being (6 items) range: 0-24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range: 0-36; higher subscale score= better QoL. All single-item measures range: 0= 'Not at all' to 4= 'Very much'. Table summarizes functional well-being subscale, individual questions are linearly scaled & combined to form functional well-being subscale score (range 0-28). High score represents better QoL. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at Cycle 22 Day 1Change at Cycle 23 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Doublet Arm16.2-0.9-0.6-0.2-0.1-0.20.6-0.10.2-0.8-1.3-0.5-1.1-3.2-4.0-1.5-0.7-0.7-3.0-6.0-5.0-5.0-12.0-9.0-2.2-0.8

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

FACT-C= Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), which assessed HRQoL of cancer participants & participants with other chronic illnesses. It consists of total 36 items (27 items of general version of FACT-C and disease-specific subscale containing 9 CRC-specific items), summarized to 5 subscales: physical well-being (7 items), functional well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items); all 3 subscales range:0-28, emotional well-being (6 items) range: 0-24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range: 0-36; higher subscale score= better QoL. All single-item measures range: 0= 'Not at all' to 4= 'Very much'. Table summarizes functional well-being subscale, individual questions are linearly scaled & combined to form functional well-being subscale score (range 0-28). High score represents better QoL. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3: Triplet Arm16.3-0.2-0.3-0.20.40.70.70.50.9-1.9-1.7-1.5-1.5-2.0-2.4-2.3-4.2-6.7-5.0-7.0-6.0-9.0-2.4-3.5

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

FACT-C= Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), which assessed HRQoL of cancer participants & participants with other chronic illnesses. It consists of total 36 items (27 items of general version of FACT-C and disease-specific subscale containing 9 CRC-specific items), summarized to 5 subscales: physical well-being (7 items), functional well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items); all 3 subscales range:0-28, emotional well-being (6 items) range: 0-24, colorectal cancer subscale (9 items) range: 0-36; higher subscale score= better QoL. All single-item measures range: 0= 'Not at all' to 4= 'Very much'. Table summarizes functional well-being subscale, individual questions are linearly scaled & combined to form functional well-being subscale score (range 0-28). High score represents better QoL. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Control Arm16.8-1.4-0.9-0.7-1.8-1.6-1.9-0.5-2.1-2.60.5-4.5-4.5-8.0-3.1-4.2

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EQ-5D-5L contains 1 item for each of 5 dimensions of health-related QoL (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression). Response options for each item varied from having no problems to moderate problems or extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L (v4.0) is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. The EQ-5D-5L is frequently used for economic evaluations of health care and has been recognized as a valid and reliable instrument for this purpose. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) is a score that is directly reported by the participant and ranges from 0 to 100 (higher is better quality health). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at Cycle 22 Day 1Change at Cycle 23 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Doublet Arm66.5-0.91.94.25.65.12.93.62.0-4.0-8.1-0.1-0.6-4.1-0.44.23.31.7-3.3-5.52.0-5.0-5.0-5.0-8.0-5.9

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EQ-5D-5L contains 1 item for each of 5 dimensions of health-related QoL (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression). Response options for each item varied from having no problems to moderate problems or extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L (v4.0) is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. The EQ-5D-5L is frequently used for economic evaluations of health care and has been recognized as a valid and reliable instrument for this purpose. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) is a score that is directly reported by the participant and ranges from 0 to 100 (higher is better quality health). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3: Triplet Arm69.00.81.43.04.03.31.31.44.10.30.20.2-4.0-3.0-4.0-3.4-10.4-18.37.08.08.08.0-8.5-11.1

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EQ-5D-5L contains 1 item for each of 5 dimensions of health-related QoL (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression). Response options for each item varied from having no problems to moderate problems or extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L (v4.0) is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. The EQ-5D-5L is frequently used for economic evaluations of health care and has been recognized as a valid and reliable instrument for this purpose. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) is a score that is directly reported by the participant and ranges from 0 to 100 (higher is better quality health). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1, C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Control Arm68.3-2.1-2.4-1.4-0.42.5-3.62.4-2.8-8.1-1.84.01.5-2.0-12.7-11.0

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating 5 functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, & social); a global health (GH) status/global quality of life scale score; 3 symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, & nausea & vomiting); & 6 standalone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, & diarrhea) & perceived financial burden. All items were graded by severity experienced during previous week & used 4-point-scale (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much). The scores were converted to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicating higher response levels (i.e., higher functioning, higher symptom severity). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 , C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at Cycle 22 Day 1Change at Cycle 23 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Doublet Arm60.7-4.33.83.54.24.35.64.34.2-5.6-2.83.9-4.6-3.2-6.02.8-5.6-2.8-8.3-8.3-8-16.7-16.70.0-13.1-10.4

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating 5 functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, & social); a global health (GH) status/global quality of life scale score; 3 symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, & nausea & vomiting); & 6 standalone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, & diarrhea) & perceived financial burden. All items were graded by severity experienced during previous week & used 4-point-scale (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much). The scores were converted to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicating higher response levels (i.e., higher functioning, higher symptom severity). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 , C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at Cycle 14 Day 1Change at Cycle 15 Day 1Change at Cycle 16 Day 1Change at Cycle 17 Day 1Change at Cycle 18 Day 1Change at Cycle 19 Day 1Change at Cycle 20 Day 1Change at Cycle 21 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3: Triplet Arm62.8-2.4-1.60.70.2-1.1-4.0-2.5-2.6-5.8-3.3-5.20.00.0-1.23.6-16.7-27.8-16.70.0-250.0-14.1-17.4

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Participants (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet

The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating 5 functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, & social); a global health (GH) status/global quality of life scale score; 3 symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, & nausea & vomiting); & 6 standalone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, & diarrhea) & perceived financial burden. All items were graded by severity experienced during previous week & used 4-point-scale (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: quite a bit, 4: very much). The scores were converted to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scale ranging from 0-100. Higher scores indicating higher response levels (i.e., higher functioning, higher symptom severity). (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle(C)1 Day(D)1 , C2 D1, C3 D1, C4 D1, C5 D1, C6 D1, C7 D1, C8 D1, C9 D1, C10 D1, C11 D1, C12 D1, C13 D1, C14 D1, C15 D1, C16 D1, C17 D1, C18 D1, C19 D1, C20 D1, C21 D1, C22 D1, C23 D1, End of Treatment, 30 Day Follow Up(each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 1 Day 1Change at Cycle 2 Day 1Change at Cycle 3 Day 1Change at Cycle 4 Day 1Change at Cycle 5 Day 1Change at Cycle 6 Day 1Change at Cycle 7 Day 1Change at Cycle 8 Day 1Change at Cycle 9 Day 1Change at Cycle 10 Day 1Change at Cycle 11 Day 1Change at Cycle 12 Day 1Change at Cycle 13 Day 1Change at End of TreatmentChange at 30 Day Follow Up
Phase 3:Control Arm62.8-3.4-1.9-0.21.4-2.2-4.51.70.0-4.82.133.34.20.0-15.5-24.6

[back to top]

Phase 3: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Urinalysis Laboratory Parameters

Clinically notable shifts was defined as worsening by at least 2 grades or to >= Grade 3 based on CTCAE version 4.03 where Grade 1: mild, Grade 2: moderate, Grade 3: severe, Grade 4: life threatening and Grade 5: death. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (for triplet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks; for doublet arm: maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks; for Control arm: maximum treatment exposure of 108 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm8
Phase 3: Doublet Arm8
Phase 3: Control Arm5

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by Investigator

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in1.45

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by BICR

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in1.45

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in8.08

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by BICR

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in5.59

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Safety Lead-in52.8

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by BICR

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of CR or PR, where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 mm short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From start of study treatment until 30 days post last dose of study treatment (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Safety Lead-in41.7

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

(NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (up to 28 days)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Safety Lead-in (CSLI)5

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants reporting AEs were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Safety Lead-in37

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs) - Interim Analysis

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants with dose interruptions, dose modifications and dose discontinuations due to AEs were reported in this outcome measure. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Safety Lead-in26

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented disease progression (PD) or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in6.47

[back to top]

(Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by BICR

DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease (maximum treatment exposure of 280 weeks)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Combined Safety Lead-in8.15

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm - Interim Analysis

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause until 204 deaths were observed (maximum treatment exposure of 89.1 weeks for triplet arm and 52.4 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm9.03
Phase 3: Control Arm5.42

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm - Final Analysis

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm9.82
Phase 3:Control Arm5.88

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Triplet Arm vs. Doublet Arm

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause until 204 deaths were observed (maximum treatment exposure of 89.7 weeks for doublet arm and 89.1 weeks for triplet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm9.82
Phase 3: Doublet Arm9.40

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Doublet Arm vs. Control Arm

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From randomization to death due to any cause until 204 deaths were observed (maximum treatment exposure of 89.7 weeks for doublet arm and 52.4 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm9.40
Phase 3:Control Arm5.88

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), v1.1 of Triplet Arm vs. Control Arm

ORR per RECIST, v1.1, was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), where CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level, all lymph nodes must be non-pathological in size (<10 millimeter [mm] short axis), and PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters persistence of one or more non-target lesions and/or maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm26.1
Phase 3:Control Arm1.9

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Encorafenib

The reported cross-arm CL/F value is a fixed-effect parameter determined from a population PK analysis. The analysis included pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionLiter/hour (Geometric Mean)
Pharmacokinetic Population of Encorafenib16.4

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Binimetinib

The reported cross-arm CL/F value is a fixed-effect parameter determined from a population PK analysis. The analysis included pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionLiter/hour (Geometric Mean)
Pharmacokinetic Population of Encorafenib19.0

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Clearance (CL) for Cetuximab

The reported cross-arm CL/F value is a fixed-effect parameter determined from a population PK analysis. The analysis included pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionLiter/hour (Geometric Mean)
Pharmacokinetic Population of Encorafenib0.0154

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1.48
Phase 3:Doublet Arm1.48

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1.43
Phase 3:Doublet Arm1.48

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1.48
Phase 3:Control Arm2.63

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm1.43
Phase 3:Control Arm1.45

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm1.48
Phase 3:Control Arm2.63

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

Time to response was defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to first radiographic evidence of response (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm1.48
Phase 3:Control Arm1.45

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.47
Phase 3: Doublet Arm4.27

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 268 weeks for doublet arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.30
Phase 3: Doublet Arm4.21

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.47
Phase 3:Control Arm1.58

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 277.4 weeks for triplet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Triplet Arm4.30
Phase 3:Control Arm1.51

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm4.27
Phase 3:Control Arm1.58

[back to top]

(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR

PFS was defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated. (NCT02928224)
Timeframe: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause (maximum treatment exposure of 268 weeks for doublet arm and 108 weeks for control arm)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 3: Doublet Arm4.21
Phase 3:Control Arm1.51

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero Time (Predose) to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 0, 1, and 6 hours, and Days 2, 3, 8, 15, and 22, and 29

Interventionh*ug/ml (Geometric Mean)
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 1mg/kg Q2W (Part A1)4800
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 3mg/kg Q2W (Part A2)12300
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 10mg/kg Q2W (Part A3)39800
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg/kg Q3W (Part A4)10800

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution of IBI308 in Plasma After Single Dose Administration

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 0, 1, 6 hours, and Days 2, 3, 8, 15, and 22, and 29

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 1mg/kg Q2W (Part A1)5.02
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 3mg/kg Q2W (Part A2)5.14
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 10mg/kg Q2W (Part A3)5.95
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg/kg Q3W (Part A4)7.2

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Sintilimab in Solid Tumor Participants

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 0, 1, 6 hours, and Days 2, 3, 8, 15, and 22, and 29

Interventionhours (Median)
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 1mg/kg Q2W (Part A1)1.05
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 3mg/kg Q2W (Part A2)2.07
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 10mg/kg Q2W (Part A3)2.27
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg/kg Q3W (Part A4)1.93

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) According to RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Independent Review Committee by Investigator

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who had achieved BOR of CR or PR according to RECIST 1.1. (NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Through out the study (up to 2 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MEL: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort A)4.5
Malignant Tumor or Neuroendocrine Tumor: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort B)14.9
NSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort C)13.5
nsNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort D)61.9
scNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort E)55.0
Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort F)85.0
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort G)42.9
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort H)14.3

[back to top]

TTR According to RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Through out the study (up to 2 years)

InterventionDays (Median)
MEL: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort A)63.0
Malignant Tumor or Neuroendocrine Tumor: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort B)64.0
NSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort C)63.0
nsNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort D)63.0
scNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort E)62.0
Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort F)63.0
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort G)62.0
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort H)62.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days in Cycle 1

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 1mg/kg Q2W (Part A1)0
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 3mg/kg Q2W (Part A2)0
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 10mg/kg Q2W (Part A3)0
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg/kg Q3W (Part A4)0

[back to top]

DOR According to RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Through out the study (up to 2 years)

InterventionDays (Median)
MEL: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort A)NA
Malignant Tumor or Neuroendocrine Tumor: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort B)NA
NSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort C)368.0
nsNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort D)NA
scNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort E)170.5
Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort F)181.0
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort G)NA
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort H)NA

[back to top]

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Sintilimab in Solid Tumor Participants

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 0, 1, 6 hours, and Days 2, 3, 8, 15, and 22, and 29

Interventionug/ml (Geometric Mean)
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 1mg/kg Q2W (Part A1)21.9
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 3mg/kg Q2W (Part A2)69.7
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 10mg/kg Q2W (Part A3)220
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg/kg Q3W (Part A4)54.6

[back to top]

Number of All Study Participants Who Demonstrate a Tumor Response

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Through out the study (up to 2 years)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 1mg/kg Q2W (Part A1)0
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 3mg/kg Q2W (Part A2)1
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 10mg/kg Q2W (Part A3)0
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg/kg Q3W (Part A4)1
MEL: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort A)1
Malignant Tumor or Neuroendocrine Tumor: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort B)13
NSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort C)5
nsNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort D)13
scNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort E)11
Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort F)17
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort G)3
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort H)1

[back to top]

The Half-life (t1/2) of IBI308 in Plasma After Single Dose Administration

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 0, 1, 6 hours, and Days 2, 3, 8, 15, and 22, and 29

InterventionDays (Geometric Mean)
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 1mg/kg Q2W (Part A1)17
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 3mg/kg Q2W (Part A2)12.7
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 10mg/kg Q2W (Part A3)12.5
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg/kg Q3W (Part A4)16.1

[back to top]

OS for Participants

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Through out the study

InterventionDays (Median)
MEL: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort A)518.0
Malignant Tumor or Neuroendocrine Tumor: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort B)342.0
NSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort C)431.0
nsNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort D)566.0
scNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort E)461.0
Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort F)NA
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort G)NA
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort H)NA

[back to top]

PFS According to RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Investigator

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Through out the study (up to 2 years)

InterventionDays (Median)
MEL: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort A)62.0
Malignant Tumor or Neuroendocrine Tumor: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort B)66.0
NSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W (Cohort C)84.0
nsNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort D)377.0
scNSCLC: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort E)194.0
Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort F)230.0
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort G)NA
Neuroendocrine Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg Q3W + Chemotherapy (Cohort H)NA

[back to top]

Clearance of IBI308 in Plasma After Single Dose Administration

(NCT02937116)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: pre-dose, post-dose at 0, 1, 6 hours, and Days 2, 3, 8, 15, and 22, and 29

Interventionml/h (Geometric Mean)
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 1mg/kg Q2W (Part A1)8.53
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 3mg/kg Q2W (Part A2)11.7
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 10mg/kg Q2W (Part A3)13.7
Solid Tumors: Sintilimab 200mg/kg Q3W (Part A4)12.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Antitumor Activity of Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Rapamycin

The number of response-evaluable patients with best overall response of complete response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; or partial response (PR), >=50% decrease in the sum of the products of the two perpendicular diameters of all target lesions (up to 5), while on study therapy stratified by dose level; Overall response (OR)=CR+PR. (NCT02975882)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level 11
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level -10
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level -20
PK Cohort With Dose Level -20

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum of Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Rapamycin Concentration Curve

Median with minimum and maximum values of the area under the drug concentration over time curve stratified by dose level. (NCT02975882)
Timeframe: Days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level 113654
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level -19532
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level -28666
PK Cohort With Dose Level -27988.5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Cycle 1 and 2 Dose Limiting Toxicities Attributable to Nanoparticle Albumin-bound Rapamycin

Number of patients with cycle 1 and 2 dose limiting toxicities possibly, probably, or definitely attributable with nanoparticle albumin-bound rapamycin stratified by dose level. (NCT02975882)
Timeframe: Up to 42 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level 11
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level -12
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level -21
PK Cohort With Dose Level -21

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events

The number of patients with adverse events that are at least possibly attributable to nanoparticle albumin-bound rapamycin stratified by dose level. (NCT02975882)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level 14
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level -112
Stratum Cohort With Dose Level -28
PK Cohort With Dose Level -25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)/Lung Cancer Supplement (LC13) Dyspnea Scale at Week 12

The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module used in conjunction with EORTC QLQ-C30 and covers typical symptoms of lung cancer (cough, pain, dyspnea, sore mouth, peripheral neuropathy, hair loss). Scores range from 0-100 and a high score represents a high level of symptomatology/problems/worse QoL. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to reference start date. Change from baseline in dyspnea scale was calculated regardless of premature study treatment discontinuation. Participants completed these questionnaires on an electronic tablet every 6 weeks during treatment and it was continued until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Part 2: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^24.6
Part 2: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m^21.9

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT)

A TEAE was considered as DLT if it occurred during the safety evaluation period (i.e. first 28 days of treatment or 14 days after the second dose of study treatment if there was a treatment delay due to non-DLT related reasons) and were deemed related to the study treatment by the investigator. The determination of whether an Adverse Event was considered a Dose Limiting Toxicity was made by the Safety Review Committee (SRC) comprising the Part 1 Investigators and the Medical Monitor(s) of the Sponsor. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: From the start of the first study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 14 days after the second dose of study treatment administration, a maximum of 42 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 85 mg/m^24
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^22

[back to top]

Part 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) characterized as either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) recorded from date of first dose of study treatment until documented PD or death. ORR analysis was based on BOR using RECIST v1.1 per investigator assessment. Per RECIST v1.1, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; and overall response = CR + PR. Per protocol, participants had computed tomography (CT)-scans and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until progressive disease (PD) or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 1177 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 85 mg/m^240
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^244

[back to top]

Part 1: OS

The OS was defined as the time from first dose of study treatment to the date of death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. The OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Following end of treatment participant and/or family was contacted by telephone every month to assess vital status. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: From Baseline (Day 1) until death. Assessed up to Part 1 DCO date of 11 August 2021 (approximately 1177 days)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 85 mg/m^210.84
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^28.08

[back to top]

Part 2: ORR

The ORR was defined as percentage of participants with a BOR characterized as either a CR or PR, recorded from randomization until documented PD or death relative to the total number of participants. ORR analysis was based on BOR assessed by BICR using RECIST v1.1. Per RECIST v1.1, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; and overall response = CR + PR. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 1177 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 2: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^244.1
Part 2: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m^221.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-LC13 Cough Scale at Week 12

The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module used in conjunction with EORTC QLQ-C30 and covers typical symptoms of lung cancer (cough, pain, dyspnea, sore mouth, peripheral neuropathy, hair loss). Score ranges from 0-100 scale and a high score represents a high level of symptomatology/problems/worse QoL. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to reference start date. Change from baseline in cough scale was calculated regardless of premature study treatment discontinuation. Participants completed these questionnaires on an electronic tablet every 6 weeks during treatment and it was continued until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Part 2: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^21.6
Part 2: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m^2-1.2

[back to top]

Part 2: Median Time to Objective Response (OR)

Time to OR as per RECIST v1.1 Criteria according to BICR was defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented objective tumor response (CR or PR, whichever was first). Per RECIST v1.1, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesion. Participants with a new anti-cancer therapy prior to OR were censored at the last tumor assessment prior to new anti-cancer therapy. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 1177 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 2: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^21.68
Part 2: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m^212.65

[back to top]

Part 1: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The PFS was defined as time from first dose of study treatment to the first documented objective PD using RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. The PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 1177 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 85 mg/m^24.19
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^23.98

[back to top]

Part 2: Overall Survival (OS)

The OS was defined as the time from randomization date to the date of death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. The OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Following end of treatment participant and/or family was contacted by telephone every month to assess vital status. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: From date of randomization (within 7 days before start of study treatment) until death. Assessed up to Part 2 DCO date of 08 February 2022 (approximately 900 days)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 2: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^27.92
Part 2: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m^28.31

[back to top]

Part 2: PFS

The PFS was defined as time from randomization to first documented objective PD using RECIST 1.1 (or response assessment in neuro-oncology brain metastases [RANO-BM] criteria for central nervous system [CNS] lesions) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. The PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 900 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 2: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^24.01
Part 2: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m^23.25

[back to top]

Part 2: Median Duration of Response (DoR)

The DoR was defined as time from the first documented objective response (CR or PR, whichever was earlier) to the date of first documented PD or death due to any cause. The DoR analysis was based on BOR assessed by BICR using RECIST v1.1. Per RECIST v1.1, CR is disappearance of all target lesions and PR is >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. The DoR was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Per protocol, participants had CT-scans and brain MRI every 6 weeks to measure tumor lesion size. This was continued throughout treatment until PD or commencement of new anti-neoplastic therapy. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: RECIST assessments performed at Baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), every 6 weeks post first dose and treatment pause, 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment, then every month thereafter, approximately maximum of 1177 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 2: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^24.14
Part 2: Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 IV4.17

[back to top]

Part 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant following or during exposure to a study treatment, whether or not causally related to the study treatment. An undesirable medical condition could be symptoms, signs or abnormal results of an investigation. An SAE was any AE that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect; or was medically important. A TEAE was any AE that occurred or worsened on or after the day of first dose of study treatment and within 30 days after discontinuation of study treatment. (NCT03088813)
Timeframe: The TEAEs were reported from the time of first study treatment administration (Day 1) up to 30 days after the date of last study treatment administration, approximately 506 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAESerious TEAEs
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 70 mg/m^22510
Part 1: Irinotecan Liposome Injection 85 mg/m^254

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

The CBR is defined as the percentage of subjects with either a CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), relative to the number of subjects in the treatment group. Per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study, as confirmed by CT or MRI . (NCT03098030)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 2.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 2: Dinutuximab + Irinotecan126
Part 2: Irinotecan112
Part 2: Topotecan64

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

The ORR is the percentage of subjects with best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR); ORR = CR + PR. Per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters as confirmed by CT or MRI. (NCT03098030)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 2.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 2: Dinutuximab + Irinotecan32
Part 2: Irinotecan36
Part 2: Topotecan19

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS will be derived as: (date of death - date of randomization) + 1. Subjects who are alive or permanently lost to follow-up at the cut-off date for the analysis will be censored at the last date the subject was known to be alive. (NCT03098030)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 2.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 2: Dinutuximab + Irinotecan6.9
Part 2: Irinotecan7.0
Part 2: Topotecan7.4

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS will be defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT03098030)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 2.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 2: Dinutuximab + Irinotecan3.5
Part 2: Irinotecan3.0
Part 2: Topotecan3.4

[back to top]

Grade 3 or Greater Acute and Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity

To determine rates of grade 3 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity, including acute toxicities occurring within 3 months of treatment, and late toxicities occurring over 3 months after completion of radiation. This outcome was clarified when results were entered. The number of patients that experienced at least 1 grade 3 (or greater) event are presented. (NCT03099265)
Timeframe: Up to 40 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma5

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response (DoR) was defined as the time from the date of the first investigator-assessed response (CR or PR) to the date of subsequent investigator-assessed PD or death, whichever is earlier. (NCT03116152)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 2-August-2019 (up to approximately 26 months)

Interventionmonth (Median)
Sintilimab8.28
Chemotherapy6.21

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of randomized participants who achieved a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using the RECIST1.1 criteria as per investigator assessment. (NCT03116152)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cut-off date of 2-August-2019 (up to approximately 26 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sintilimab12.6
Chemotherapy6.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Median OS in all participants is presented. (NCT03116152)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 2-August-2019 (up to approximately 26 months)

Interventionmonth (Median)
Sintilimab7.23
Chemotherapy6.21

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Unequivocal progression of non-target leisions and the appearance of ≥1 new lesions were also considered as PD. (NCT03116152)
Timeframe: Through Final Analysis data cutoff date of 2-August-2019 (up to approximately 26 months)

Interventionmonth (Median)
Sintilimab1.58
Chemotherapy2.86

[back to top]

Response

"Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR." (NCT03119064)
Timeframe: Every 2 months on study treatment then very 3 months once treatment has stopped, until progression of disease up to 2 years.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseProgressive Disease
Dose 118
Dose 212

[back to top]

Toxicities

Treatment emergent toxicities of nanoliposomal irinotecan with continuous low-dose temozolomide using CTCAE version 4.03, grades 2 through 4 (NCT03119064)
Timeframe: Baseline through 30 days post off study treatment

,
Interventionevents (Number)
NeutropeniaALT/ASTHypokalemiaHypophosphatemiaNauseaFatigueDiarrheaAnorexiaDehydrationUrticaria
Dose 10211120001
Dose 21110222220

[back to top]

Determination of Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose of nanoliposomal irinotecan with continuous low-dose temozolomide for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. (NCT03119064)
Timeframe: Every two weeks for 4 weeks

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
All Participants50

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who demonstrated complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) radiographically according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 as assessed by investigator. The analysis will include all subjects treated (ITT) who received at least one dose of the study treatment. If the final study consists of both Part A and Part B, the analysis will be done separately for each part. (NCT03136055)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part A: Pembrolizumab Only7
Part B: Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy5

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of Response is defined as the time from the date of first response (CR or PR) until the date of disease progression or death. Duration of response will be reported for Part A and B (if available) separately. Only patients who have a demonstrated response will be used in final analysis. (NCT03136055)
Timeframe: Over the duration of the study, which is estimated to be approximately 32 months.

Interventionmonths (Number)
Part A: Pembrolizumab Only18.9
Part B: Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy6.71

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from the first day of study treatment with protocol therapy to the date of death due to any cause. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to summarize OS. Median OS and its 95% confidence interval will be obtained for Part A and B (if available) separately. (NCT03136055)
Timeframe: Over the duration of the study, which is estimated to be approximately 32 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part A: Pembrolizumab Only7.8
Part B: Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy4.8

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival is defined as the time from the first day of study treatment with protocol therapy to the date of documented tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, as determined by RECIST v1.1 for PFS. Subjects who did not progress or die will be censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to summarize progression median PFS with 95% confidence interval for Part A and B (if available) separately. (NCT03136055)
Timeframe: Over the duration of the study, which is estimated to be approximately 32 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part A: Pembrolizumab Only1.8
Part B: Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy2

[back to top]

Phase 1, T1/2: Half-life of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38

Half-life for irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 could not be estimated for phase 1:schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 20 mg/m^2 and phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 40 mg/m^2 arm as the slope of the terminal phase of the concentration-time profiles could not be determined. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan and its metabolite, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,
Interventionhours (Median)
Eribulin
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 20 mg/m^227.50
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^234.70

[back to top]

Phase 1, Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38

(NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan and its metabolite, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
EribulinIrinotecanActive Metabolite SN-38
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 20 mg/m^20.0800.2500.420
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^20.1350.3050.305
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 100 mg/m^20.0800.3000.330
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 125 mg/m^20.0500.1700.250

[back to top]

Phase 1, Total Clearance (CL) of Eribulin and Irinotecan

CL for irinotecan could not be estimated for phase 1:schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 20 mg/m^2 and phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 40 mg/m^2 arm because it was not possible to calculate half-life as the slope of the terminal phase of the concentration-time profiles could not be determined. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,
Interventionliter per hour (L/h) (Geometric Mean)
EribulinIrinotecan
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 100 mg/m^22.906027.27
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 125 mg/m^21.752130.30

[back to top]

Phase 1, Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Eribulin and Irinotecan

Vz for irinotecan could not be estimated for phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 20 mg/m^2 and phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 40 mg/m^2 arm because it was not possible to calculate half-life as the slope of the terminal phase of the concentration-time profiles could not be determined. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,
Interventionliter (Geometric Mean)
Eribulin
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 20 mg/m^2124.70
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^2126.96

[back to top]

Phase 1, Volume of Distribution (Vz) of Eribulin and Irinotecan

Vz for irinotecan could not be estimated for phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 20 mg/m^2 and phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 40 mg/m^2 arm because it was not possible to calculate half-life as the slope of the terminal phase of the concentration-time profiles could not be determined. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,
Interventionliter (Geometric Mean)
EribulinIrinotecan
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 100 mg/m^2130.78248.5
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 125 mg/m^263.35195.1

[back to top] [back to top]

Volume of Distribution Estimates From the Population PK Model for Eribulin

"Per the planned PK analysis, PK samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. Eribulin plasma concentration data from this study were pooled from studies (NCT00069264, NCT00069277, NCT00326950, NCT00706095, NCT01000376, NCT01106248, NCT02171260, NCT00413192, NCT01458249, NCT03441360 and NCT01327885), and a population PK model was applied to the pooled dataset. Data presented are the volume of distribution of the central compartment (V1), volume of distribution of the first peripheral compartment (V2), and volume of distribution of the second peripheral compartment (V3) parameter estimates with Measure Type Number defining the eribulin PK model. They are population PK model predictions and have been estimated using non-linear mixed effects model." (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-120 hours after eribulin infusion; Cycle 1 Day 8: pre-dose and at the end of the eribulin infusion (cycle length=21 days)

Interventionliter (Number)
V1V2V3
Eribulin Mesilate - All Participants4.082.03106

[back to top]

Phase 1, Total Clearance (CL) of Eribulin and Irinotecan

CL for irinotecan could not be estimated for phase 1:schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 20 mg/m^2 and phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 40 mg/m^2 arm because it was not possible to calculate half-life as the slope of the terminal phase of the concentration-time profiles could not be determined. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,
Interventionliter per hour (L/h) (Geometric Mean)
Eribulin
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 20 mg/m^23.1781
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^22.4581

[back to top]

Phase 1, T1/2: Half-life of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38

Half-life for irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 could not be estimated for phase 1:schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 20 mg/m^2 and phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 40 mg/m^2 arm as the slope of the terminal phase of the concentration-time profiles could not be determined. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan and its metabolite, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,
Interventionhours (Median)
EribulinIrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 100 mg/m^230.005.14012.000
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 125 mg/m^225.304.43010.390

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE was defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or reemerged during treatment, having been present at pre-treatment (baseline) but stopped before treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to approximately 2 years 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 20 mg/m^23
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^24
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 100 mg/m^23
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 125 mg/m^23
Phase 2: RMS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^29
Phase 2: NRSTS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^29
Phase 2: EWS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^29

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence at any dose if it resulted in death or life-threatening AE or required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or resulted in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 2 years and 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 20 mg/m^21
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^23
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 100 mg/m^20
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 125 mg/m^21
Phase 2: RMS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^25
Phase 2: NRSTS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^24
Phase 2: EWS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^23

[back to top]

Phase 2: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with BOR of CR, PR, or durable stable disease (SD) based on RECIST 1.1 (durable SD was defined as SD with duration of greater than [>] 11 weeks). CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. All pathological (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis <10 mm. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: From the date of first dose to the date of first documentation of PD, or date of death, whichever occurred first up to approximately 2 years 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: RMS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^255.6
Phase 2: NRSTS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^233.3
Phase 2: EWS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^255.6

[back to top]

Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving best overall response (BOR) of confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) determined by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. All pathological (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis less than (<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameter (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: From date of first dose of study drug until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or up to approximately 2 years 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: RMS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^211.1
Phase 2: NRSTS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^211.1
Phase 2: EWS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^211.1

[back to top]

Phase 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from date of first dose to the date of disease progression (PD). PFS was assessed based on the investigators' assessments utilizing RECIST 1.1. PD was defined as at least 20% increase or 5 mm increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was estimated and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: From the date of first dose to the date of first documentation of PD, or date of death, whichever occurred first up to approximately 2 years 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: RMS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^22.69
Phase 2: NRSTS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^21.35
Phase 2: EWS Cohort, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^26.70

[back to top]

Phase 1, AUC(0-inf): Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero (Pre-dose) Extrapolated to Infinite Time of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38

AUC(0-inf) for irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 could not be estimated for phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 20 mg/m^2 and phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 40 mg/m^2 arm because it was not possible to calculate half-life as the slope of the terminal phase of the concentration-time profiles could not be determined. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan and its metabolite, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Eribulin
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 20 mg/m^2438.1
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^2506.0

[back to top]

Phase 1, AUC(0-inf): Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero (Pre-dose) Extrapolated to Infinite Time of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38

AUC(0-inf) for irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 could not be estimated for phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 20 mg/m^2 and phase 1: schedule A, eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + irinotecan 40 mg/m^2 arm because it was not possible to calculate half-life as the slope of the terminal phase of the concentration-time profiles could not be determined. (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan and its metabolite, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
EribulinIrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 100 mg/m^2666.95036.1169.0
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 125 mg/m^2576.93698.5149.4

[back to top]

Phase 1, AUC(0-t): Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero (Pre-dose) to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38

(NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan and its metabolite, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,,,
Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
EribulinIrinotecanMetabolite SN-38
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 20 mg/m^2422.51812.668.00
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^2403.73686.1145.04
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 100 mg/m^2616.94693.9138.22
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 125 mg/m^2603.53633.765.47

[back to top]

Phase 1, Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Eribulin, Irinotecan and Its Active Metabolite SN-38

(NCT03245450)
Timeframe: For eribulin, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-120 hours post-eribulin infusion; For irinotecan and its metabolite, Cycle 1 Day 1: 0-24 hours post-irinotecan infusion (cycle length=21 days)

,,,
Interventionnanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
EribulinIrinotecanActive Metabolite SN-38
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 20 mg/m^2369.3538.86.518
Phase 1: Schedule A, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 40 mg/m^2179.4399.517.170
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 100 mg/m^2348.71168.125.409
Phase 1: Schedule B, Eribulin Mesilate 1.4 mg/m^2 + Irinotecan 125 mg/m^2323.31555.418.614

[back to top]

Model Predicted Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL) of Eribulin

"Per the planned PK analysis, PK samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. Eribulin plasma concentration data from this study were pooled from studies (NCT00069264, NCT00069277, NCT00326950, NCT00706095, NCT01000376, NCT01106248, NCT02171260, NCT00413192, NCT01458249, NCT03441360 and NCT01327885), and a population PK model was applied to the pooled dataset. The data presented are the CL parameter estimates, with Measure Type Number defining the eribulin PK model. They are population PK model predictions and have been estimated using non-linear mixed effects model." (NCT03245450)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-120 hours after eribulin infusion; Cycle 1 Day 8: pre-dose and at the end of the eribulin infusion (cycle length=21 days)

InterventionL/hr (Number)
Eribulin Mesilate - All Participants2.89

[back to top]

Clinical Response Rate

"The number of participants that achieved a clinical response following treatment. Clinical response is defined as achieving a best overall response of a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR).~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm.~Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters." (NCT03279237)
Timeframe: After 4 and 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (8 and 16 weeks); and 3-4 weeks after chemo radiation (24-25 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FOLFIRINOX + Pre-operative Radiation20

[back to top]

The Completion Rate of Chemotherapy in Combination With Chemoradiation

The number of participants that complete the assigned study intervention. (NCT03279237)
Timeframe: 21 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FOLFIRINOX + Pre-operative Radiation23

[back to top]

Pathologic Complete Response Rate

The number of participants that achieve a pathologic complete response at surgery following FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiation. All patients will undergo a full pathological review of their surgical specimen according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Classification, 6th edition. Initial gross evaluation and identification of resection margins will be performed jointly by the surgeon and the pathologist. Pathological complete response will be defined as the absence of any viable tumor cells within the pathologic specimen. (NCT03279237)
Timeframe: 29 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
FOLFIRINOX + Pre-operative Radiation7

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause (NCT03288987)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (AryoGen Pharmed Bevacizumab)30
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (Roche Bevacizumab)17

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first date of documentation progression (per investigator assessment) or death as a result of any cause. (NCT03288987)
Timeframe: PFS was measured from the start of chemotherapy to the date of disease progression or to the date of death if no progression whichever came first, assessed up to 12 months

InterventionDay (Median)
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (AryoGen Pharmed Bevacizumab)232
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (Roche Bevacizumab)210

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

"Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of each of the following,~The treatment modalities did not destroy or modify the cancer cells,~The tumor either became larger (disease progression) or stayed the same size after treatment,~Death due to any cause,~Discontinuation of treatment" (NCT03288987)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionDay (Median)
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (AryoGen Pharmed Bevacizumab)73
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (Roche Bevacizumab)73

[back to top]

Incidence of the Adverse Events

Safety was assessed on the basis of reports of adverse events, laboratory-test results, and vital sign measurements. Adverse events were categorized According to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute, version 5.0, in which a grade of 1 indicates mild adverse events, a grade of 2 moderate adverse events, a grade of 3 serious adverse events, and a grade of 4 life-threatening adverse events (NCT03288987)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (AryoGen Pharmed Bevacizumab)76
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (Roche Bevacizumab)44

[back to top]

Number of Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Samples Among Patients (Immunogenicity)

Anti-drug antibody assessment (NCT03288987)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (AryoGen Pharmed Bevacizumab)1
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (Roche Bevacizumab)1

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Tumor response was defined as partial and complete responses, according to the RECIST criteria ( version 1.1). The definitions were as follows: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), decrease of at least 30% in the lesion that has the largest diameter; Objective Response Rate (ORR) = CR + PR. (NCT03288987)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (AryoGen Pharmed Bevacizumab)17
Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI-3 (Roche Bevacizumab)5

[back to top]

Half-life of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide

Median (Range) for the time required for the serum concentration to fall to 50% of its starting dose by dose level stratified by study part and dose level. (NCT03323034)
Timeframe: Up to 10 days

Interventionhours (Median)
Part A Dose Level 1: 15 mg/m^25.3
Part A Dose Level 2: 20 mg/m^25
Part A Dose Level 3: 25 mg/m^25.2
Part A Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^24.7
Part A PK Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^26.1

[back to top]

MTD/RP2D of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) will be the maximum dose at which fewer than one-third of patients experience dose limiting toxicities. (NCT03323034)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Treatment (Pevonedistat, Temozolomide, Irinotecan)35

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Greater Toxicities Associated With Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide

Frequency of patients who experience at least one grade 3 or higher toxicity that is at least possibly attributable to pevonedistat using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 by dose level stratified by study part and dose level. (NCT03323034)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years 8 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part A Dose Level 1: 15 mg/m^25
Part A Dose Level 2: 20 mg/m^24
Part A Dose Level 3: 25 mg/m^26
Part A Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^22
Part A PK Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^24

[back to top]

T Max of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide

Median (Range) for the time at which the maximum (peak) serum concentration occurs by dose level stratified by study part and dose level. (NCT03323034)
Timeframe: Up to 10 days

Interventionhours (Median)
Part A Dose Level 1: 15 mg/m^21.
Part A Dose Level 2: 20 mg/m^21
Part A Dose Level 3: 25 mg/m^21
Part A Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^21.1
Part A PK Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^21.1

[back to top]

Anti-tumor Activity of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide

Frequency of disease response (best overall response of partial or complete response) assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR by dose level. (NCT03323034)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part A Dose Level 1: 15 mg/m^21
Part A Dose Level 2: 20 mg/m^21
Part A Dose Level 3: 25 mg/m^20
Part A Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^20
Part A PK Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^20

[back to top]

AUC of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide

Median (range) of the area under the drug concentration over time (pre-dose and then 0, 1, 2, 4, 6-8, and 24-hours post-dose infusion) curve stratified by study part and dose level. (NCT03323034)
Timeframe: Up to 10 days

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Median)
Part A Dose Level 1: 15 mg/m^2803
Part A Dose Level 2: 20 mg/m^2973.5
Part A Dose Level 3: 25 mg/m^21340
Part A Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^22018.5
Part A PK Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^21957

[back to top]

C Max of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide

Median (Range) for the maximum (peak) serum concentration by dose level stratified by study part and dose level. (NCT03323034)
Timeframe: Up to 10 days

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Part A Dose Level 1: 15 mg/m^2156
Part A Dose Level 2: 20 mg/m^2218.5
Part A Dose Level 3: 25 mg/m^2303.5
Part A Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^2419
Part A PK Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^2363.8

[back to top]

Clearance of Pevonedistat in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide

Median (Range) for the rate of elimination of the drug by dose level stratified by study part and dose level. (NCT03323034)
Timeframe: Up to 10 days

InterventionL/hr/m^2 (Median)
Part A Dose Level 1: 15 mg/m^218.8
Part A Dose Level 2: 20 mg/m^220.8
Part A Dose Level 3: 25 mg/m^218.9
Part A Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^217.5
Part A PK Dose Level 4: 35 mg/m^217.9

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the proportion of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by a investigator assessment based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.1. (NCT03368859)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 30 days after last dose of study drug; median time on follow-up was 25.6 (0.3 - 64.4) and 37.6 (0.3 - 66.3) weeks in ABT-165 plus FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI, respectively

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
ABT-165 Plus FOLFIRI5.6
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI14.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause. (NCT03368859)
Timeframe: Follow up continued until the first occurrence of radiographic progression, death from any cause or termination of the study; median follow-up time was 25.6(0.3-64.4) and 37.6(0.3-66.3) weeks in ABT-165 plus FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, respectively

InterventionMonths (Median)
ABT-165 Plus FOLFIRI7.95
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRINA

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the first occurrence of radiographic progression determined by investigator assessment or death from any cause. (NCT03368859)
Timeframe: Follow up continued until the first occurrence of radiographic progression, death from any cause or termination of the study; median follow-up time was 25.6(0.3-64.4) and 37.6(0.3-66.3) weeks in ABT-165 plus FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, respectively

InterventionMonths (Median)
ABT-165 Plus FOLFIRI3.78
Bevacizumab Plus FOLFIRI7.36

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the ITT Analysis Set

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1; (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Tislelizumab20.3
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy9.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs)

Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), which includes laboratory tests, physical exams, electrocardiogram results and vital signs (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: From the first dose date to 30 days after the last dose date; up to approximately 4 years and 11 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Number of participants with TEAEsNumber of participants with SAEs
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy236106
Tislelizumab245109

[back to top]

HRQoL as Assessed by European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) in the ITT Analysis Set

Mean change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L visual acuity score (VAS). The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' A higher score indicates better health outcomes. (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 6
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy72.5-5.9
Tislelizumab73.7-0.6

[back to top]

HRQoL as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L in the PD-L1 Positive Analysis Set

Mean change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L visual acuity score (VAS). The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' A higher score indicates better health outcomes. (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 6
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy70.54.4
Tislelizumab74.1-0.5

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) in the ITT Analysis Set

DOR is defined as the time from the first determination of an objective response until the first documentation of progression as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, or death, whichever comes first (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tislelizumab7.1
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy4.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set.

DOR is defined as the time from the first determination of an objective response until the first documentation of progression as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, or death, whichever comes first (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tislelizumab7.1
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy5.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) in the PD-L1 Positive Analysis Sets

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1; (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Tislelizumab26.3
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy11.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set

OS is defined as the length of time from the date of randomization until the date of death due to any cause in all randomized participants (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years and 10 months from date of first randomization

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tislelizumab8.6
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy6.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set

OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death due to any cause in the PD-L1 positive population, defined as vCPS ≥10%. (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tislelizumab10.2
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy5.1

[back to top]

HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-Oesophagus Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18) Reported in ITT Analysis Set

Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-OES18 index score. The EORTC QLQ-OES18 is a questionnaire that assesses overall symptoms in esophageal cancer participants. It includes questions related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes. (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 6
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy16.33.0
Tislelizumab14.7-0.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the ITT Analysis Set

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first; reported for the ITT analysis set (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tislelizumab1.6
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy2.1

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first; reported for the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Through End-of-Trial Analysis data cutoff date of 28-Dec-2022 (up to approximately 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Tislelizumab2.7
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy2.3

[back to top]

HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-OES18) in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set.

Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-OES18 index score. The EORTC QLQ-OES18 is a questionnaire that assesses overall symptoms in esophageal cancer participants. It includes questions related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes. (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 6
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy18.1-2.9
Tislelizumab16.5-0.9

[back to top] [back to top]

HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 in the PDL-1 Positive Analysis Set

Mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Index score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer participants. It includes global health status and quality of life questions related to overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Raw scores are transformed into a 0 to 100 scale via linear transformation. A higher score indicates better health outcomes (NCT03430843)
Timeframe: Baseline to Cycle 6 (21 days per cycle)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineChange at Cycle 6
Investigator Chosen Chemotherapy18.80.5
Tislelizumab16.80.5

[back to top]

Vigil Manufacture Success Rate: Number of Participants Eligible for Treatment on the Main Study.

Participants were considered eligible for treatment, if the tissue submitted to Gradalis met all criteria, including manufacturing product release criteria. (NCT03495921)
Timeframe: From manufacturing start date until 4 weeks post manufacturing for each tissue procurement (assessed up to 17 months).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Total Number of Tissue Procurements4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the event of disease recurrence/progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (version 1.1) for target lesions and assessed CT/MRI by local investigator. (NCT03495921)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (assessed up to 3 years).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Group A: Vigil in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide2.8
Group B: Irinotecan and Temozolomide9.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as time from randomization to death or to the date of last follow-up. The date of last follow-up confirming survival will be used as the censoring date for subjects who are alive and/or do not have a known date of death. (NCT03495921)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until date of death from any cause, whichever came first (assessed up to 3 years).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Group A: Vigil in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide16.1
Group B: Irinotecan and Temozolomide3.3

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who have prolonged stable disease or a partial or complete response or complete response to therapy according to RECIST 1.1. (NCT03495921)
Timeframe: 6 months after treatment with Vigil.

InterventionProportion of participants. (Number)
Group A: Vigil in Combination With Irinotecan and Temozolomide0
Group B: Irinotecan and Temozolomide0

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Defined as the rate of Complete Response (CR) plus Partial Response (PR): Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), at least 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions; (NCT03504423)
Timeframe: 38 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CPI-613, mFolfirinox104
Folfirinox90

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"Defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of progressive disease or death from any cause.~Progressive Disease is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must have also demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression." (NCT03504423)
Timeframe: 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
CPI-613, mFolfirinox7.82
Folfirinox7.98

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause (NCT03504423)
Timeframe: 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
CPI-613, mFolfirinox11.10
Folfirinox11.73

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

To compare the ORR between the 2 treatment arms. ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieve objective tumor response (CR or PR) per modified RECIST 1.1: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. (NCT03665441)
Timeframe: ~24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eryaspase Plus Chemotherapy41
Chemotherapy Alone32

[back to top]

Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events as Assessed by CTCAE v5.0

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of eryaspase in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone by assessing the number of patients with with treatment emergent adverse events per CTCAE v5.0 (NCT03665441)
Timeframe: ~9 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of patients with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE)number of patients with TEAE >= Grade 3Number of patients with TE SAENumber of patients with TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuationNumber of patients with TE SAE with outcome of death
Chemotherapy Alone246176105419
Eryaspase Plus Chemotherapy2481951224614

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

To compare the DoR between the 2 treatment arms (NCT03665441)
Timeframe: ~24 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Eryaspase Plus Chemotherapy5.7
Chemotherapy Alone6.8

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

To compare the between the 2 treatment arms (NCT03665441)
Timeframe: ~24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eryaspase Plus Chemotherapy147
Chemotherapy Alone126

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

To compare PFS between the 2 treatment arm. Progression is determined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT03665441)
Timeframe: ~24 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Eryaspase Plus Chemotherapy3.7
Chemotherapy Alone3.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

To determine whether the addition of eryaspase to chemotherapy improves OS when compared to chemotherapy alone (NCT03665441)
Timeframe: ~12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Eryaspase Plus Chemotherapy7.5
Chemotherapy Alone6.7

[back to top]

Time to Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 First Worsening in Global Health Status Analysis

The time to first Worsening was defined as the date of randomization to the date of first Worsening occurred in patient score on their global health status. Patients who did not have any worsening were censored at date of last measurement or at baseline if no measurement is available post-baseline. (NCT03665441)
Timeframe: ~1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Eryaspase Plus Chemotherapy4.0
Chemotherapy Alone3.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Assessed by RECIST 1.1

Will be summarized using standard Kaplan-Meier methods; where estimates of the median time will be obtained with 95% confidence intervals. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT03736720)
Timeframe: From first dosing of study treatment combination to disease progression, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Liposomal Irinotecan, Leucovorin, Fluorouracil)3.9

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QOL) as Assessed by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

Will be treated as quantitative data and summarized by time-point using the mean and standard deviation. The QOL scores at each follow-up time may be compared with base-line levels using the paired t-test or sign test. The overall QoL rating ranges from 0 (poor) to 10 (good). (NCT03736720)
Timeframe: From treatment initiation until treatment completion/progression (up to 3 years).

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Pre Treatment QoLEnd of Treatment QoL
Treatment (Liposomal Irinotecan, Leucovorin, Fluorouracil)5.95.5

[back to top]

Time-to Treatment Failure

Will be summarized using standard Kaplan-Meier methods; where estimates of the median time will be obtained with 90% confidence intervals. (NCT03736720)
Timeframe: From enrollment to discontinuation of treatment, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Liposomal Irinotecan, Leucovorin, Fluorouracil)3.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Will be summarized using standard Kaplan-Meier methods; where estimates of the median time will be obtained with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT03736720)
Timeframe: From first dosing of study treatment combination to time of death or imitation of a new therapy, assessed up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Liposomal Irinotecan, Leucovorin, Fluorouracil)8.3

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in All Participants

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1 by central imaging vendor review. The percentage of all participants who experienced a CR or PR for the first pembrolizumab course is presented. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab16.1
Chemotherapy3.3

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1 by central imaging vendor review. The percentage of participants with a PD-L1 CPS ≥10 who experienced a CR or PR for the first pembrolizumab course is presented. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab24.0
Chemotherapy6.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in All Participants

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesions was also considered PD. Median PFS for the first pembrolizumab course as assessed by central imaging vendor review per RECIST 1.1 in all participants is presented. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab2.5
Chemotherapy2.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in All Participants

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Median OS for the first pembrolizumab course in all participants is presented. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab8.4
Chemotherapy5.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Median OS for the first pembrolizumab course in participants with a PD-L1 CPS ≥10 is presented. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab12.0
Chemotherapy5.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Median OS for the first pembrolizumab course in participants with SCC of the esophagus is presented. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab8.4
Chemotherapy5.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Combined Positive Score ≥10 (PD-L1 CPS ≥10)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesions was also considered PD. Median PFS for the first pembrolizumab course as assessed by central imaging vendor review per RECIST 1.1 is presented for participants with a PD-L1 CPS ≥10. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab4.0
Chemotherapy4.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a Complete Response (CR: Disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) as assessed using RECIST 1.1 by central imaging vendor review. The percentage of participants with SCC of the esophagus who experienced a CR or PR for the first pembrolizumab course is presented. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Pembrolizumab16.7
Chemotherapy3.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE for the first pembrolizumab course are presented. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pembrolizumab10
Chemotherapy9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. The number of participants who experienced ≥1 AE for the first pembrolizumab course are presented. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pembrolizumab62
Chemotherapy56

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in Participants With Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also have demonstrated an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of ≥1 new lesions was also considered PD. Median PFS for the first pembrolizumab course as assessed by central imaging vendor review per RECIST 1.1 is presented for participants with SCC of the esophagus. (NCT03933449)
Timeframe: From randomization through final analysis data cutoff date of 13-Feb-2019 (Up to ~24 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pembrolizumab2.3
Chemotherapy2.8

[back to top]

PFS

Will be determined based on RECIST v 1.1. PFS will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median PFS and 95% confidence interval will be reported. Patients will be censored at the last disease assessment date. (NCT04072445)
Timeframe: From study entry to the first of either disease progression or death from any cause, assessed up to 20 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Trifluridine and Tipiracil, Irinotecan)3.9

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Will be defined as the proportion of patients who experience a partial response, complete response, or have stable disease as their best response. DCR will be reported descriptively and a 95% confidence interval will be reported. (NCT04072445)
Timeframe: Up to 20 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Trifluridine and Tipiracil, Irinotecan)50

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Will be defined as the proportion of patients who experience either a partial response or complete response as their best response. ORR will be reported descriptively and a 95% confidence interval will be reported. (NCT04072445)
Timeframe: Up to 20 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Trifluridine and Tipiracil, Irinotecan)20.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median OS and 95% confidence interval will be reported. Patients will be censored at the date patient was last known to be alive. (NCT04072445)
Timeframe: From study entry to death from any cause, assessed up to 20 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Trifluridine and Tipiracil, Irinotecan)9.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

The maximum grade for each type of adverse event by patient will be summarized by frequencies and percentages using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. (NCT04072445)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3+ AEGrade 4 AEGrade 5 AE
Treatment (Trifluridine and Tipiracil, Irinotecan)2040

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Will be defined as the proportion of evaluable patients who are progression-free (stable disease, partial response, complete response) at 16 weeks and assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1. Confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Clopper and Pearson. (NCT04072445)
Timeframe: Up to 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Trifluridine and Tipiracil, Irinotecan)37.0

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR)

For TTR analysis, a response to therapy is defined as a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1. (NCT04753216)
Timeframe: Approximately 29 Weeks

Interventiondays (Number)
Pt 01-01-101Pt 01-01-102
Treatment (Bevacizumab, Irinotecan Sucrosofate)13780

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

To determine the CBR, this endpoint will calculate the proportion of treated, evaluable subjects who experience clinical benefit from trial therapy. Clinical benefit is defined as confirmed complete response (CR); confirmed partial response (PR); or stable disease (SD) for ≥ 4 months (calculated from the initiation of trial therapy on C1D1) per RECIST 1.1.16. Will tabulate the proportion of subjects who experience each of the following as their best response to trial therapy: CR, PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD) or not evaluable (NE) per RECIST 1.1. CBR data will be collected from baseline until the subject experiences disease progression initiates subsequent anti-cancer therapy, or completes study participation (whichever occurs first). (NCT04753216)
Timeframe: Approximately 29 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable Disease
Treatment (Bevacizumab, Irinotecan Sucrosofate)020

[back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease

To calculate the Duration of SD (CR, PR, and SD) for the combination of irinotecan liposome and bevacizumab, this endpoint will be calculated as the time that elapsed between the day of initiation of trial therapy and subsequent disease progression (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded on study). Duration of SD analysis will capture subjects who achieve a best response of CR, PR, or SD, as defined per RECIST 1.1. For Duration of SD analysis, disease progression is defined as progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1. Duration of SD data will be collected from baseline until the subject experiences disease progression, initiates subsequent anti-cancer therapy, or completes study participation. If disease progression is not observed prior to initiating subsequent anti-cancer therapy or completing study participation, the Duration of SD will be censored as the last available disease assessment. (NCT04753216)
Timeframe: Approximately 29 Weeks

Interventionweeks (Number)
Treatment (Bevacizumab, Irinotecan Sucrosofate)14

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

To calculate the DOR for the combination of irinotecan liposome and bevacizumab, this endpoint will be calculated as the time that elapsed between the day of first documented response to trial therapy (CR or PR, whichever is first recorded) and subsequent disease progression (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest tumor measurements recorded on study). For DOR analysis, response is defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1; and disease progression is defined as progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1.16 DOR data will be collected from the time of first response to trial therapy until the subject experiences disease progression, initiates subsequent anti-cancer therapy, or completes study participation (whichever occurs first). If disease progression is not observed prior to initiating subsequent anti-cancer therapy or completing study participation, the DOR will be censored as the last available disease assessment. (NCT04753216)
Timeframe: Approximately 29 Weeks

InterventionWeeks (Number)
Treatment (Bevacizumab, Irinotecan Sucrosofate)9.5

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

This endpoint will calculate the progression-free survival time as the time that elapsed between the initiation of trial therapy (C1D1) and the day of first documented disease progression or death from any cause for all evaluable subjects. Per RECIST 1.1, Progressive Disease (PD) = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression). (NCT04753216)
Timeframe: Approximately 29 Weeks

InterventionDays (Number)
Treatment (Bevacizumab, Irinotecan Sucrosofate)117

[back to top]

Number of Observed Serious and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events

Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0 (NCI-CTCAE v5.0). (NCT04753216)
Timeframe: Approximately 29 Weeks

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
Treatment (Bevacizumab, Irinotecan Sucrosofate)107

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

"This endpoint will be calculated based on the proportion of subjects who are alive and progression-free at 16 weeks after initiating trial therapy.~Per RECIST 1.1, Progressive Disease (PD) = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression)." (NCT04753216)
Timeframe: At 16 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Bevacizumab, Irinotecan Sucrosofate)1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

(NCT05718466)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Fractionated Radiosurgery and Bevacizumab5.1
Bev With Chemo1.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT05718466)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Fractionated Radiosurgery and Bevacizumab7.2
Bev With Chemo4.8

[back to top]

Local Tumor Control

(NCT05718466)
Timeframe: 2 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fractionated Radiosurgery and Bevacizumab14
Bev With Chemo4

[back to top]