Page last updated: 2024-12-08

decitabine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID451668
CHEMBL ID1201129
CHEBI ID50131
SCHEMBL ID4006
MeSH IDM0062824

Synonyms (125)

Synonym
AC-1135
HY-A0004
AB00918337-07
5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine ,
2353-33-5
2'-deoxy-5-azacytidine
nsc-127716
decitabine ,
dezocitidine
azadc
5-aza-cdr
dacogen
e-7373
CHEBI:50131 ,
DAC ,
decitabine (usan/inn)
D03665
dacogen (tn)
MOLMAP_000063
5-azadeoxycytidine
NCGC_5ADOC ,
MLS001332588
1,3, 5-triazin-2(1h)-one, 4-amino-1-(2-deoxy--d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-
4-amino-1-[(2r,4s,5r)-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl]-1,3,5-triazin-2-one
5-azadc
5-aza-dc
nsc 127716
einecs 219-089-4
2-desoxy-5-azacytidine
c8h12n4o4
s-triazin-2(1h)-one, 4-amino-1-(2-deoxy-beta-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-
brn 0617982
decitabine [usan:inn:ban]
5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, >=97%
DB01262
4-amino-1-(2-deoxy-beta-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-s-triazin-2(1h)-one
4-amino-1-(2-deoxy-beta-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one
azadc compound
5a2dc
5-aza-2-deoxycytidine
smr000857076
MLS001332587 ,
4-amino-1-[(2r,4s,5r)-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]-1,3,5-triazin-2-one
CHEMBL1201129
4-amino-1-[(2s,4s,5r)-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]-1,3,5-triazin-2-one
776b62cq27 ,
ccris 8227
jnj 30979754
unii-776b62cq27
2-deoxyazacytidine
jnj-30979754
5-aza-deoxycytidine
dtxcid5010432
dtxsid7030432 ,
cas-2353-33-5
tox21_112311
BCP9000593
HMS2235O03
BCP0726000271
NCGC00166088-05
cid_451668
bdbm96274
1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one, 4-amino-1-(2-deoxy-.beta.-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-
decitabine [mart.]
decitabine [inn]
decitabine [vandf]
decitabine [orange book]
decitabine [mi]
astx-727 component decitabine
inqovi component decitabine
decitabine [who-dd]
decitabine component of inqovi
astx727 component decitabine
decitabine [usan]
4-amino-1-(2-deoxy-.beta.-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-s-triazin-2(1h)-one
CS-0372
S1200
AKOS015895047
gtpl6805
astx-727
inqovi (decitabine + cedazuridine)
astx727 (decitabine + cedazuridine)
CCG-208143
MLS006010136
SCHEMBL4006
tox21_112311_1
NCGC00166088-02
J-700084
XAUDJQYHKZQPEU-KVQBGUIXSA-N
4-amino-1-(2-deoxy-?-d-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one
4-amino-1-((2r,4s,5r)-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)-1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one
5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine)
HB1356
4-amino-1-(2-deoxy-beta-d-erythro-pento furanosyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2(1h)-one
AB00918337_08
mfcd00043011
4-amino-1-[(2r,4s,5r)-4-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-2-yl]-1,2-dihydro-1,3,5-triazin-2-one
EX-A961
sr-01000838879
SR-01000838879-4
deoxy-5-azacytidine
SW218076-2
decitabine (2 inverted exclamation marka-deoxy-5-azacytidine).cd
HMS3677L07
AS-17558
BCP02870
HMS3413L07
Q1181878
decitabine (nsc127716; 5aza-cdr)
decitabine, free base
AMY33354
compound, azadc
2' deoxy 5 azacytidine
5 aza 2' deoxycytidine
5azadc
5 azadeoxycytidine
decitabine- bio-x
BA164359
EN300-269341
decitabinum
2'-desoxy-5-azacytidine
l01bc08
decitabina
decitabine (mart.)
Z2467077030

Research Excerpts

Overview

Decitabine (DAC) is an FDA-approved DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor that is used in the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. It is a pyrimidine analogue of the nucleoside cytidine, which can lead to injury to endothelium.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Decitabine (DAC) is an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase used to treat leukemia, but primary or secondary resistance to DAC may develop during therapy. "( Abnormal regulation of miR-29b-ID1 signaling is involved in the process of decitabine resistance in leukemia cells.
Jin, Y; Lin, J; Ma, J; Qian, J; Wen, X; Xia, P; Xu, Z, 2023
)
2.58
"Decitabine is a DNA-hypomethylating agent that has been widely applied for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients who are elderly or unfit for intensive therapy. "( Multi-dimensional analysis identifies an immune signature predicting response to decitabine treatment in elderly patients with AML.
Claxton, DF; Ehmann, WC; Hohl, RJ; Jia, B; Mineishi, S; Naik, S; Rybka, WB; Schell, TD; Sivik, JM; Songdej, N; Wang, M; Zeng, H; Zhao, C; Zheng, H, 2020
)
2.23
"Decitabine (DAC) is an FDA-approved DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor that is used in the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. "( TERT and DNMT1 expression predict sensitivity to decitabine in gliomas.
Arrillaga-Romany, I; Cahill, D; Herold-Mende, C; Monje, M; Park, JW; Sahm, F; Steffl, B; Turcan, Ş; Wick, W, 2021
)
2.32
"Decitabine (DAC) is a pyrimidine analogue of the nucleoside cytidine, which can lead to injury to endothelium."( Decitabine-induced kidney thrombotic microangiopathy with glomerular crescents formation and tubular necrosis: A case report.
Qin, AB; Su, T; Tan, Y, 2020
)
2.72
"Decitabine (DAC) is a well-known DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, which has been widely used for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). "( Decitabine Downregulates TIGAR to Induce Apoptosis and Autophagy in Myeloid Leukemia Cells.
Hong, M; Li, L; Liu, W; Qian, S; Sun, Q; Zhu, H, 2021
)
3.51
"Decitabine is an approved hypomethylating agent used for treating hematological malignancies. "( Decitabine Promotes Modulation in Phenotype and Function of Monocytes and Macrophages That Drive Immune Response Regulation.
Cardoso-Silva, PM; Castro, RC; Emery, FDS; Fontanari, C; Frantz, FG; Zambuzi, FA, 2021
)
3.51
"Decitabine is a deoxycytidine nucleoside derivative inhibitor of DNA-methyltransferases, which has been studied extensively and is approved for myelodysplastic syndrome in adults but with less focus in children. "( A multicenter, randomized study of decitabine as epigenetic priming with induction chemotherapy in children with AML.
Alvaro, F; Arceci, RJ; Arndt, C; Barnette, P; Boklan, J; Carpten, J; Cooper, T; Farrar, JE; Gooden, GC; Gore, L; Lee, D; Legendre, C; Liang, WS; Macy, ME; Martin, L; Meshinchi, S; Narendran, A; Pollard, J; Salhia, B; Triche, TJ; Wai, D, 2017
)
2.17
"Decitabine (DAC) is a hypomethylating drug used in myelodisplastic syndrome, that has been shown to exert immunomodulatory effects."( Decitabine induces regulatory T cells, inhibits the production of IFN-gamma and IL-17 and exerts preventive and therapeutic efficacy in rodent experimental autoimmune neuritis.
Bramanti, P; Chikovani, T; Colletti, G; Fagone, P; Mammana, S; Mangano, K; Mazzon, E; Nicoletti, F; Saraceno, A, 2018
)
2.64
"Decitabine bridge is a safe regimen before allo-HSCT in children with refractory hematological malignancies."( [The safety of decitabine as bridging pretreatment regimen before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric hematological malignancies].
Bian, XN; Fan, LY; Hu, SY; Kong, LJ; Li, J; Ling, J; Liu, H; Lu, J; Xiao, PF; Yao, YH, 2018
)
1.56
"Decitabine (DAC) is an epigenetic modulating agent that induces tumor suppressor gene reexpression based on its gene-specific DNA hypomethylation."( Synergistic Efficacy of the Demethylation Agent Decitabine in Combination With the Protease Inhibitor Bortezomib for Treating Multiple Myeloma Through the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway.
Chen, X; Dong, B; Feng, J; Gao, G; Gu, H; Jin, Y; Shu, M; Wu, X; Xu, L; Zhang, J, 2019
)
1.49
"Decitabine is a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor and is considered a promising drug to treat myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with p53 mutations. "( Opposing effects of acute versus chronic inhibition of p53 on decitabine's efficacy in myeloid neoplasms.
Asada, S; Fukuyama, T; Goyama, S; Hayashi, Y; Kitamura, T; Liu, X; Tamura, M; Tanaka, Y; Yonezawa, T, 2019
)
2.2
"Decitabine (Dacogen(®)) is a deoxynucleoside analogue of cytidine that selectively inhibits DNA methyltransferases. "( Decitabine: a review of its use in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.
Curran, MP, 2013
)
3.28
"Decitabine is a methylation inhibitor, which has different action mechanism and targeting characteristics from the traditional chemotherapy, representing a new therapeutic strategy."( [Research progress of epigenetic drug decitabine in AML].
Li, HM; Zhang, R, 2014
)
1.39
"Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent that irreversibly inhibits DNA methyltransferase I, inducing leukemic differentiation and re-expression of epigenetically silenced putative tumor antigens. "( Maintenance Therapy with Decitabine after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.
Abboud, CN; Cashen, AF; Choi, J; DiPersio, JF; Fiala, MA; Gao, F; Holt, M; Jacoby, MA; Pusic, I; Stockerl-Goldstein, KE; Uy, GL; Vij, R; Westervelt, P, 2015
)
2.16
"Thus decitabine is an effective therapy during bridge time to HSCT in patients with MDS and AML."( [Therapeutic efficacies of decitabine application prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia].
Fu, C; Han, Y; Jin, Z; Liu, H; Ma, L; Miao, M; Qiu, H; Tang, X; Wang, J; Wang, P; Wu, D; Yan, S; Zheng, H; Zhou, J, 2015
)
1.23
"Decitabine is a viable therapeutic option for patients with MPN-AML, MP-AP and high-risk PMF."( Therapeutic benefit of decitabine, a hypomethylating agent, in patients with high-risk primary myelofibrosis and myeloproliferative neoplasm in accelerated or blastic/acute myeloid leukemia phase.
Badar, T; Borthakur, G; Cortes, JE; Daver, N; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, HM; Newberry, KJ; Pemmaraju, N; Pierce, SR; Ravandi, F; Verstovsek, S, 2015
)
1.45
"Guadecitabine (SGI-110) is a novel hypomethylating dinucleotide of decitabine and deoxyguanosine resistant to degradation by cytidine deaminase."( Safety and tolerability of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, randomised, dose-escalation phase 1 study.
Azab, M; Chung, W; Daver, N; Griffiths, EA; Hao, Y; Issa, JJ; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Lowder, JN; Naim, S; O'Connell, C; Oganesian, A; Rizzieri, D; Roboz, G; Stock, W; Taverna, P; Tibes, R; Walsh, K; Yee, K, 2015
)
1.22
"Decitabine is a pyrimidine analog incorporated into DNA, where it irreversibly inhibits DNA methyltransferases through covalent adduct formation with the enzyme."( The European Medicines Agency Review of Decitabine (Dacogen) for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Summary of the Scientific Assessment of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use.
Béhanzin, E; Bowen, D; Demolis, P; Flores, B; Gisselbrecht, C; Hudson, I; Moreau, A; Nieto, M; Pignatti, F; Salmonson, T; Stemplewski, H, 2016
)
1.42
"Decitabine is an effective therapy for patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). "( Increased PD-1/STAT1 ratio may account for the survival benefit in decitabine therapy for lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome.
Chang, CK; Guo, J; He, Q; Li, X; Song, LX; Su, JY; Tao, Y; Wu, D; Wu, LY; Xiao, C; Xu, F; Zhang, Z; Zhou, LY, 2017
)
2.13
"Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent with activity in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). "( Feasibility of allo-SCT after hypomethylating therapy with decitabine for myelodysplastic syndrome.
Champlin, R; Davisson, J; de Lima, M; De Padua Silva, L; Faderl, S; Garcia-Manero, G; Giralt, S; Issa, JP; Kantarjian, H; Kebriaei, P; Ravandi, F, 2009
)
2.04
"Decitabine is a cytidine analogue that has activity as a hypomethylating agent and has been evaluated in the therapy of patients with high-risk MDS."( Decitabine in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes.
Garcia-Manero, G; Issa, JP; Kantarjian, H; Ravandi, F; Santos, FP, 2010
)
2.52
"Decitabine is a synthesized cytosine analog that is a potent inhibitor of DNA methylation. "( Decitabine, independent of apoptosis, exerts its cytotoxic effects on cell growth in melanoma cells.
Chen, DW; Liu, QY; Wang, HZ; Xie, LP; Zhang, RQ, 2011
)
3.25
"Decitabine is a nucleoside analog used in the treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome. "( Decitabine triphosphate levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients receiving prolonged low-dose decitabine administration: a pilot study.
Beijnen, JH; Jansen, RS; Keizer, RJ; Rosing, H; Schellens, JH; Wijermans, PW, 2012
)
3.26
"Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent with proven clinical efficacy in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). "( Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism array-based karyotyping in myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and its impact on treatment outcomes following decitabine treatment.
Do, YR; Huh, J; Kim, DD; Kim, H; Kim, HJ; Kim, KH; Kim, MK; Kim, SH; Kim, T; Mun, YC; Yi, JH, 2013
)
2.03
"Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent that has activity in patients with leukemia. "( Long-term follow-up of a phase I study of high-dose decitabine, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide plus allogeneic transplantation for the treatment of patients with leukemias.
Andersson, B; Champlin, R; Couriel, D; de Lima, M; Donato, M; Gajewski, J; Giralt, S; Kantarjian, H; Khouri, I; Ravandi, F; Shahjahan, M; van Besien, K, 2003
)
2.01
"Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent that has shown encouraging preliminary anti-CML activity."( Results of decitabine (5-aza-2'deoxycytidine) therapy in 130 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Andreeff, M; Cortes, J; Faderl, S; Garcia-Manero, G; Giles, FJ; Issa, JP; Kantarjian, HM; Keating, M; O'Brien, S; Rios, MB; Shan, J; Talpaz, M, 2003
)
1.43
"Decitabine is a cytosine analogue synthesized in the 1960s that is currently enjoying a revival of interest prompted by the elucidation of DNA methylation inhibition as its major mechanism of action, along with increased understanding of the role of DNA methylation in epigenetic dysregulation in cancer. "( Decitabine.
Issa, JP, 2003
)
3.2
"Decitabine (DAC) is a small molecule nucleotide analog that is incorporated into DNA and traps human DNA methyltransferases. "( Decitabine: development of a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor for hematological malignancies.
Bayar, E; Fine, G; Lyons, J; McCullar, M; Rolens, R; Rosenfeld, C; Rubinfeld, J, 2003
)
3.2
"Decitabine is a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor under development by SuperGen Inc and MGI Pharma Inc for the potential treatment of a range of hematological malignancies, including myelodysplastic syndrome, solid tumors and sickle cell disease."( Decitabine. MGI Pharma Inc/SuperGen Inc.
Arthur, C, 2004
)
3.21
"Decitabine appears to be a promising new therapy for the treatment of MDS; however, defining the optimal dosing schedule and exploring the possible use in combination with other agents such as the histone deacetylase inhibitors need further evaluation."( Decitabine in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Saba, HI; Wijermans, PW, 2005
)
2.49
"Decitabine is a potent demethylating agent that exhibits clinical activity against myeloid malignancies. "( 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) can relieve p21WAF1 repression in human acute myeloid leukemia by a mechanism involving release of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) without requiring p21WAF1 promoter demethylation.
Decoteau, JF; Dong, WF; Geyer, CR; Hirsch, C; Ichinohasama, R; Sanche, SE; Scott, SA; Sheridan, D, 2006
)
2.08
"Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent. "( Decitabine: in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Croom, KF; McKeage, K, 2006
)
3.22
"Decitabine is a hypomethylating agent that is incorporated into DNA and forms irreversible covalent adducts with DNA-methyltransferases."( The role of decitabine in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes.
Atallah, E; Garcia-Manero, G; Kantarjian, H, 2007
)
1.44

Effects

Decitabine has been shown to be active in numerous studies including International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) intermediate-1 to high risk patients, in secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) arising from MDS and in MDS with poor-risk cytogenetics. It has a short serum half-life and limited stability in tissue culture.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Decitabine has a short serum half-life and limited stability in tissue culture."( Recurrent transcriptional responses in AML and MDS patients treated with decitabine.
Beales, J; Gruszczynska, A; Ley, TJ; Link, DC; Miller, CA; Petti, AA; Ramakrishnan, SM; Shah, NM; Upadhyay, P; Welch, JS, 2022
)
1.67
"Decitabine has a short serum half-life and limited stability in tissue culture."( Recurrent transcriptional responses in AML and MDS patients treated with decitabine.
Beales, J; Gruszczynska, A; Ley, TJ; Link, DC; Miller, CA; Petti, AA; Ramakrishnan, SM; Shah, NM; Upadhyay, P; Welch, JS, 2022
)
1.67
"Decitabine has frequently been deployed but its efficacy and safety profile are not well described in this population."( Clinical Benefit Derived from Decitabine Therapy for Advanced Phases of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.
Hoffman, R; Kremyanskaya, M; Li, L; Mascarenhas, J; Moshier, E; Najfeld, V; Tremblay, D; Zhou, S, 2021
)
1.63
"Decitabine has been explored as a reduced-intensity therapy for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). "( Patterns of infectious complications in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes patients treated with 10-day decitabine regimen.
Abboud, CN; Ali, AM; Cashen, AF; DiPersio, JF; Fehniger, TA; Gao, F; Ghobadi, A; Jacoby, MA; Oh, ST; Pusic, I; Romee, R; Schroeder, MA; Stockerl-Goldstein, KE; Uy, GL; Vij, R; Wartman, LD; Weisel, D; Welch, JS; Westervelt, P, 2017
)
2.11
"Decitabine (DAC) has been reported to enhance the immunogenicity of tumor cells, thereby reinstating endogenous immune recognition and tumor lysis."( Decitabine Inhibits Gamma Delta T Cell Cytotoxicity by Promoting KIR2DL2/3 Expression.
Chen, J; Chen, Y; Cui, J; Li, M; Li, W; Liu, Y; Niu, C; Xu, D; Zhou, L; Zhu, S, 2018
)
2.64
"Decitabine, which has been approved to treat MDS, cannot eliminate malignant clones of MDS."( Successful treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome with decitabine-based chemotherapy followed by haploidentical lymphocyte infusion: A case report and literature review.
Ma, Y; Shen, J; Wang, LX, 2018
)
1.44
"Decitabine has shown clinical benefits in patients with intermediate (INT)-2 or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), determined according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), but the benefits have not been well demonstrated in patients with lower-risk (IPSS low or INT-1) disease. "( Clinical Outcomes of Decitabine Treatment for Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome on the Basis of the International Prognostic Scoring System.
Chang, MH; Choi, CW; Do, YR; Jang, JH; Jeong, SH; Jung, KS; Kim, HG; Kim, I; Kim, MK; Kim, SJ; Kim, SY; Kim, YJ; Kim, YK; Lee, JH; Mun, YC; Park, J; Park, S; Park, SK; Yi, HG, 2019
)
2.28
"Decitabine has been approved for the treatment of all subtypes of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). "( Decitabine of reduced dosage in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a retrospective analysis.
Chang, C; Chen, Y; Hou, M; Li, X; Song, L; Song, Q; Su, J; Wu, D; Wu, L; Xu, F; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z; Zhou, L, 2014
)
3.29
"Decitabine has previously been shown to induce lethal mutagenesis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). "( Lack of mutational hot spots during decitabine-mediated HIV-1 mutagenesis.
Bonnac, L; Landman, SR; Mansky, LM; Patterson, SE; Rawson, JM; Reilly, CS, 2015
)
2.13
"Decitabine has favorable effects in terms of overall survival, which were considered clinically meaningful in the context of a manageable toxicity profile and after consideration of the lack of therapeutic alternatives for these patients."( The European Medicines Agency Review of Decitabine (Dacogen) for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Summary of the Scientific Assessment of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use.
Béhanzin, E; Bowen, D; Demolis, P; Flores, B; Gisselbrecht, C; Hudson, I; Moreau, A; Nieto, M; Pignatti, F; Salmonson, T; Stemplewski, H, 2016
)
1.42
"Decitabine has the synergistic effect with TSA."( [Effect of decitabine combined with Trichostatin A on MDS cell line SKM-1 in vitro].
Ding, XS; Hang, HM; Jiang, SH; Liu, H; Song, GQ; Wang, XF; Xu, RR; Yang, L, 2008
)
1.46
"Decitabine has established efficacy in MDS and shown promising activity in AML at low doses. "( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of decitabine for the treatment of leukemia.
Bryan, J; Garcia-Manero, G; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H, 2011
)
2.1
"Decitabine has been shown to be active in numerous studies including International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) intermediate-1 to high risk patients, in secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) arising from MDS, and in MDS with poor-risk cytogenetics."( Clinical results with the DNA hypomethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: an update.
Joeckel, TE; Lübbert, M, 2012
)
1.33
"Decitabine has demethylating effect on the FHIT gene hypermethylation of plasma from MDS patients."( [Methylation of FHIT gene promoter region in DNA from plasma of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and demethylating effect of decitabine].
Dai, D; Deng, YF; Hu, MQ; Xu, YL; Zhang, L; Zhang, XQ; Zhang, XZ, 2012
)
1.3
"Decitabine has been evaluated for the treatment of AML in several different settings. "( The role of decitabine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.
Ganetsky, A, 2012
)
2.2
"Decitabine has also received orphan drug status in the US as a host-protective agent in the treatment of AML."( Decitabine: 2'-deoxy-5-azacytidine, Aza dC, DAC, dezocitidine, NSC 127716.
, 2003
)
2.48
"Decitabine has been studied in several phase II trials for solid tumours as well as in different types of leukaemia."( Decitabine: 2'-deoxy-5-azacytidine, Aza dC, DAC, dezocitidine, NSC 127716.
, 2003
)
2.48
"Decitabine, an old drug, has now made a comeback as a targeted agent and a prototype for epigenetic therapy in cancer. "( Decitabine.
Issa, JP, 2003
)
3.2
"Decitabine has been shown to have a broad range of antineoplastic activity in preclinical studies."( DNA methylation in haematological malignancies: the role of decitabine.
Garcia-Manero, G; Giles, FJ; Hennessy, BT; Kantarjian, HM, 2003
)
1.28
"Decitabine has response rates of 17-49% in myelodysplastic syndrome in multiple phase II and III studies and also activity in acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia."( Review: recent clinical trials in epigenetic therapy.
Issa, JP; Oki, Y, 2006
)
1.06
"Decitabine has promising activity in CML."( Results of decitabine therapy in the accelerated and blastic phases of chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Beran, M; de Vos, D; Estey, E; Giralt, S; Kantarjian, HM; Keating, M; Kornblau, S; O'Brien, SM; Rios, MB; Talpaz, M, 1997
)
1.41

Actions

Decitabine promotes p27 gene expression possibly by inhibiting its DNA methylation, thereby decreases the proliferation of astrocytes, neuronal death and infarct volume after ischemic stroke.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Decitabine promotes p27 gene expression possibly by inhibiting its DNA methylation, thereby decreases the proliferation of astrocytes, neuronal death and infarct volume after ischemic stroke."( Decitabine attenuates ischemic stroke by reducing astrocytes proliferation in rats.
Li, D; Zhang, Q; Zhang, X; Zhao, H, 2022
)
2.89
"Decitabine can inhibit the proliferation of KMS-18 cells and induce their apoptosis, its mechanism ralates with partially reversing the methylation of P53 gene promoter in KMS-18 cells."( [Inducing Effect of Decitabine on Apoptosis of KMS-18 Myeloma Cells and Its Mechanism].
He, PC; Wang, XN; Zhang, M, 2019
)
2.28
"Decitabine was shown to suppress the growth of RCC cells via G2/M cell cycle arrest and the p38-NF-κB signaling pathway may play a role in the anti-neoplastic effect of decitabine in RCC cells."( Decitabine induces G2/M cell cycle arrest by suppressing p38/NF-κB signaling in human renal clear cell carcinoma.
Han, T; Liu, Y; Shang, D; Xu, X, 2015
)
2.58
"Decitabine may enhance the allo-NK cell-mediated killing effects on LSC by up-regulation of the expressions of NKG2D ligands on LSC."( [Decitabine Enhances the Sensitivity of Leukemia Stem Cell to Allo-NK Cell-Mediated Killing].
Chen, J; Chen, SX; Huang, HT; Li, JG; Li, Q; Peng, Q; She, MR; Wei, SS; Xia, PF, 2017
)
2.81

Treatment

Decitabine may represent a newer therapeutic option for pediatric AML, especially as it appears to induce important epigenetic alterations. The treatment of decitabin combined with modified CAG regimen for relapsed and refractory AML shows high response rate, low side effects, so it worthy to further clinical study.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Decitabine treatment restored TET2 methylation and EZH2 transcription and ameliorated CIN in AML."( Analysis of TET2 and EZH2 gene functions in chromosome instability in acute myeloid leukemia.
Han, F; He, N; Hua, M; Ji, C; Ma, D; Tian, T; Wang, J; Wang, R; Zhang, C; Zhong, C, 2020
)
1.28
"Decitabine treatment of latency I EBV+ Burkitt lymphoma (BL) sensitized cells to lysis by EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells (EBV-CTLs)."( Epigenetic reprogramming sensitizes immunologically silent EBV+ lymphomas to virus-directed immunotherapy.
Alonso, A; Cesarman, E; Dalton, T; Doubrovina, E; Dyomin, V; Elemento, O; Gewurz, BE; Giulino-Roth, L; O'Reilly, RJ; Oakes, CC; Pan, H; Pankov, D; Phillip, JM; Reynolds, R; Savalia, B; Scholze, H; Selvakumar, A; Vizconde, T; Weigel, C, 2020
)
1.28
"Decitabine treatment was also associated with higher incidence of transfusion independence (42% vs."( Hypomethylating agents in the treatment of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Deng, C; Du, X; Geng, S; Huang, X; Li, M; Weng, J; Wu, P; Xu, R, 2021
)
1.34
"Decitabine treatment of different cell lines showed that induced loss of methylation at the MN1 locus can result in an increase of MN1 expression, indicating that MN1 expression is coregulated by DNA methylation."( MN1 overexpression is driven by loss of DNMT3B methylation activity in inv(16) pediatric AML.
Arentsen-Peters, TCJM; Baruchel, A; Danen-van Oorschot, AA; de Haas, V; Fornerod, M; Larmonie, NSD; Obulkasim, A; Pieters, R; Reinhardt, D; Sonneveld, E; Trka, J; Valerio, D; van den Heuvel-Eibrink, MM; Zimmermann, M; Zwaan, CM, 2018
)
1.2
"Decitabine treatment leads to restoration of RASSF1A, activation of hippo pathway followed by decreased expression of its oncogenic downstream targets (CTGF & CYR61)."( Decitabine augments cytotoxicity of cisplatin and doxorubicin to bladder cancer cells by activating hippo pathway through RASSF1A.
Anand, V; Appunni, S; Khandelwal, M; Mathur, S; Seth, A; Sharma, A; Singh, P, 2018
)
2.64
"Decitabine treatment showed a survival benefit in the higher-risk group of IPSS lower-risk MDS patients who responded to treatment, and classification using the LR-PSS category was helpful for this subgroup, indicating that decitabine treatment might alter the natural course of disease in these patients."( Clinical Outcomes of Decitabine Treatment for Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome on the Basis of the International Prognostic Scoring System.
Chang, MH; Choi, CW; Do, YR; Jang, JH; Jeong, SH; Jung, KS; Kim, HG; Kim, I; Kim, MK; Kim, SJ; Kim, SY; Kim, YJ; Kim, YK; Lee, JH; Mun, YC; Park, J; Park, S; Park, SK; Yi, HG, 2019
)
2.28
"Decitabine treatment brought the peripheral blood and bone marrow cell counts of SSAT mice to the level of wild-type mice."( Spermidine/spermine N(1)-acetyltransferase activity associates with white blood cell count in myeloid leukemias.
Alhonen, L; Jantunen, E; Mäntymaa, P; Mustjoki, S; Pirnes-Karhu, S; Uimari, A, 2014
)
1.12
"Decitabine treatment induced CT45 mRNA and protein expression in EOC cells, and promoter transgene analyses indicated that DNA methylation directly represses CT45 promoter activity."( DNA hypomethylation-mediated activation of Cancer/Testis Antigen 45 (CT45) genes is associated with disease progression and reduced survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Akers, SN; Barger, CJ; Karpf, AR; Link, PA; Mhawech-Fauceglia, P; Miller, A; Odunsi, K; Zhang, W, 2015
)
1.14
"Decitabine treatment was efficacious in Chinese patients with MDS with its safety profile comparable to the global studies of decitabine conducted to date."( Decitabine for Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Chinese Patients: An Open-Label, Phase-3b Study.
Cai, Z; Chen, B; Du, X; He, G; Huang, X; Jin, J; Li, J; Li, X; Liang, H; Liu, T; Ruan, C; Shao, Z; Shen, Z; Wu, D; Xiao, Z; Yu, L, 2015
)
3.3
"Decitabine-treated 4T1 cells stimulated greater IFN-gamma release from tumor-sensitized lymphocytes, implying increased immunogenicity."( DNA methyltransferase inhibition increases efficacy of adoptive cellular immunotherapy of murine breast cancer.
Baek, A; Bear, HD; Damle, SR; Graham, LJ; Manjili, MH; Payne, KK; Terracina, KP, 2016
)
1.16
"Decitabine treatment decreased global methylation, DNMT activity and DNMT1, DNMT3a and DNMT3b mRNA expression in MDA-MB-231 docetaxel-resistant cells."( Altered DNA methylation is associated with docetaxel resistance in human breast cancer cells.
Brown, I; Kastl, L; Schofield, AC, 2010
)
1.08
"Decitabine treatment of normal, nonanemic baboons induced similar increases in the γ/γ+β chain synthetic ratio and the γ/total β-like globin RNA ratio and also increased expression of ɛ-globin transcripts. "( Decitabine increases fetal hemoglobin in Papio anubis by increasing γ-globin gene transcription.
Akpan, I; Banzon, V; DeSimone, J; Ibanez, V; Lavelle, D; Vaitkus, K, 2010
)
3.25
"Decitabine treatment resulted in a decrease in global DNA methylation, corresponding to 4876 probeset IDs with significantly reduced methylation levels, while the expression of 2583 IDs was modified."( Analysis of genome-wide methylation and gene expression induced by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine identifies BCL2L10 as a frequent methylation target in acute myeloid leukemia.
Criscuolo, M; D'alo', F; Fabiani, E; Giachelia, M; Greco, M; Guidi, F; Hohaus, S; Leone, G; Rutella, S; Voso, MT, 2010
)
1.08
"Decitabine treatment was associated with improvements in patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) parameters."( Low-dose decitabine versus best supportive care in elderly patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: final results of the randomized phase III study of the European Organisation for Rese
Aul, C; Baila, L; Beeldens, F; Coens, C; de Witte, T; Eckart Schaefer, H; Ganser, A; Germing, U; Giagounidis, A; Hagemeijer, A; Labar, B; Lübbert, M; Muus, P; Pflüger, KH; Platzbecker, U; Rüter, BH; Salih, HR; Selleslag, D; Suciu, S; Wijermans, PW, 2011
)
1.51
"Decitabine treatment was feasible and effective in Korean patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, and the overall survival was significantly longer in patients showing hematologic improvement."( A prospective multicenter observational study of decitabine treatment in Korean patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
Choi, CW; Jang, JH; Joo, YD; Kim, HG; Kim, SH; Kim, YK; Lee, JH; Min, YH; Park, E; Park, J; Park, S; Park, SK, 2011
)
2.07
"Decitabine-treated keratinocytes also show increased mir-302c and proliferation similar to other Oct4(+) cells."( Treatment with the cancer drugs decitabine and doxorubicin induces human skin keratinocytes to express Oct4 and the OCT4 regulator mir-145.
Bickenbach, JR; Chinnathambi, S; Tomanek-Chalkley, A; Wiechert, S; Winter, MC, 2012
)
1.38
"Decitabine treatment of H1299 cells resulted in reduced methylation levels in gene promoters, elevated transcript levels of CHRNB4 and CHRNA3, and a slight downregulation of TERT demonstrating epigenetic regulation of lung cancer cells."( Epigenetic screen identifies genotype-specific promoter DNA methylation and oncogenic potential of CHRNB4.
Bermejo, JL; Claus, R; Dienemann, H; Gu, L; Jacobsson, H; Meister, M; Muley, T; Peil, B; Plass, C; Risch, A; Sarkisyan, N; Scherf, DB, 2013
)
1.11
"Decitabine treatment results in a biphasic effect in overall NK cell lytic function, which correlates with a biphasic pattern of global hypomethylation."( Decitabine has a biphasic effect on natural killer cell viability, phenotype, and function under proliferative conditions.
Denman, CJ; Kopp, LM; Lee, DA; Ray, A; Senyukov, VS; Somanchi, SS; Zhu, S, 2013
)
2.55
"Decitabine treatment is associated with a response rate that is higher in patients with high-risk cytogenetics (i.e., complex karyotype and/or abnormalities of chromosome 7) than in patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics (two abnormalities or single abnormalities excluding 5q-, 20q-, and -Y)."( In vivo effects of decitabine in myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia: review of cytogenetic and molecular studies.
Hackanson, B; Lübbert, M; Robbel, C; Wijermans, P, 2005
)
1.38
"Decitabine-treated MDS patients can be managed as outpatients after completion of a 3-day infusion schedule."( Quantification of outpatient management and hospitalization of patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome treated with low-dose decitabine.
Germing, U; Haas, PS; Kündgen, A; Lübbert, M; Müller-Berndorff, H; Pitako, JA; Van den Bosch, J; Wijermans, PW, 2005
)
1.25
"Co-treatment with decitabine reversed TETs' levels and modulated immune response after repeated cocaine exposure."( Psychostimulant-induced aberrant DNA methylation in an in vitro model of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Alttoa, M; Anier, K; Jaako, K; Kalda, A; Kisand, K; Kokassaar, R; Sikk, K; Somelar, K, 2022
)
1.04
"Rats treated with decitabine showed hypomethylation and reduced infarct volume in the cortex."( Decitabine attenuates ischemic stroke by reducing astrocytes proliferation in rats.
Li, D; Zhang, Q; Zhang, X; Zhao, H, 2022
)
2.49
"Treatment with decitabine plus anti-PD-1 promoted the activation and expansion of tumor-infiltrated CD8+ progenitor Tex and efficiently suppressed tumor growth in multiple tumor models."( Decitabine priming increases anti-PD-1 antitumor efficacy by promoting CD8+ progenitor exhausted T cell expansion in tumor models.
Bo, X; Chang, Y; Chen, H; Chen, M; Dong, L; Han, W; Li, X; Li, Y; Nie, J; Wang, C; Zhang, X, 2023
)
2.69
"Treatment with decitabine also caused apoptosis of Th1 and Th17 cells in active arthritis in a highly selective manner."( Pharmacological modulation of T cell immunity results in long-term remission of autoimmune arthritis.
Chiang, NY; Clanchy, FIL; Ericsson, P; Huang, YS; Lin, HH; Luo, SF; McNamee, K; Ogbechi, J; Perocheau, D; Salford, LG; Sjögren, HO; Stone, TW; Sundstedt, A; Topping, LM; Tseng, WY; Williams, RO; Xue, ZT, 2021
)
0.96
"Pre-treatment with decitabine may represent a newer therapeutic option for pediatric AML, especially as it appears to induce important epigenetic alterations."( A multicenter, randomized study of decitabine as epigenetic priming with induction chemotherapy in children with AML.
Alvaro, F; Arceci, RJ; Arndt, C; Barnette, P; Boklan, J; Carpten, J; Cooper, T; Farrar, JE; Gooden, GC; Gore, L; Lee, D; Legendre, C; Liang, WS; Macy, ME; Martin, L; Meshinchi, S; Narendran, A; Pollard, J; Salhia, B; Triche, TJ; Wai, D, 2017
)
1.05
"The treatment of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for relapsed and refractory AML shows high response rate, low side effects, so it worthy to further clinical study."( [Clinical resarch of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia].
Jing, Y; Liu, SY; Niu, JH; Yang, H; Yu, L; Zhang, Q; Zhu, CY; Zhu, HY, 2015
)
1.08
"Treatment with decitabine after azacitidine failure yielded modest ORR (19.4%) with short response duration and poor OS."( Outcome of patients with high risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and advanced Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) treated with decitabine after azacitidine failure.
Adès, L; Berthon, C; Braun, T; Brechignac, S; Cherait, A; Fenaux, P; Gardin, C; Harel, S; Park, S; Quesnel, B; Rigal, M; Thépot, S; Willekens, C, 2015
)
0.96
"Pretreatment with decitabine decreased the cytotoxic activity of MEK inhibitors in KRAS-mutant ovarian cancer cells, with reciprocal downregulation of DNMT1 and MEK/ERK phosphorylation."( KRAS Genomic Status Predicts the Sensitivity of Ovarian Cancer Cells to Decitabine.
Chang, YM; Khabele, D; Kim, JW; Schreiber, SL; Shamji, AF; Stewart, ML; Tamayo, P; Wang, S; Wilson, AJ, 2015
)
0.97
"Treatment with decitabine or other epigenetic modulators could provide a means for more effective immunological targeting of CT45."( DNA hypomethylation-mediated activation of Cancer/Testis Antigen 45 (CT45) genes is associated with disease progression and reduced survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Akers, SN; Barger, CJ; Karpf, AR; Link, PA; Mhawech-Fauceglia, P; Miller, A; Odunsi, K; Zhang, W, 2015
)
0.76
"Co-treatment with decitabine and doxorubicin results first in increased OCT4 and mir-145, then a decrease in both, suggesting that OCT4 and mir-145 regulate each other."( Treatment with the cancer drugs decitabine and doxorubicin induces human skin keratinocytes to express Oct4 and the OCT4 regulator mir-145.
Bickenbach, JR; Chinnathambi, S; Tomanek-Chalkley, A; Wiechert, S; Winter, MC, 2012
)
0.99
"Treatment with decitabine resulted in the reexpression of EGFR in CAMA1 and MB453."( Epigenetic inactivation of EGFR by CpG island hypermethylation in cancer.
Díaz-Montero, CM; Estecio, M; Issa, JP; Mao, L; Montero, AJ; Shen, L; Youssef, EM, 2006
)
0.67
"Treatment with Decitabine resulted in a significant increase in circulating neutrophils, platelets, and hemoglobin with respect to pretreatment values in over 50% of patients."( 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (Decitabine) induces trilineage response in unfavourable myelodysplastic syndromes.
Babare, R; De Angelis, V; Gattei, V; Lo Re, G; Marotta, G; Monfardini, S; Pinto, A; Sardeo, G; Zagonel, V, 1993
)
0.93

Toxicity

The CHG priming regimen provided a safe and effective salvage regimen for higher risk MDS patients. Decitabine was tolerated at all doses administered. Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects included non-life-threatening hepatotoxicity and hyperglycaemia.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" 5-AzadCyd is highly toxic in cultured cells and animals and is utilized as a potent antitumor agent for treatment of certain human cancers."( Toxicity of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine to mammalian cells is mediated primarily by covalent trapping of DNA methyltransferase rather than DNA demethylation.
Jaenisch, R; Jüttermann, R; Li, E, 1994
)
0.29
" The high recombinagenic activity of these two drugs suggests that--despite their therapeutic effects against cancer--a question is raised whether these drugs should be considered for adverse effects in cancer chemotherapy."( Somatic recombination: a major genotoxic effect of two pyrimidine antimetabolitic chemotherapeutic drugs in Drosophila melanogaster.
Cunha, KS; de Andrade, HH; Graf, U; Reguly, ML, 2002
)
0.31
" Similar to previous studies, we show that mice that are heterozygous for a nonfunctional Dnmt1 gene are partially protected against the deleterious effects of 5-azaCdR; however, methylation levels are not restored in these mice, suggesting that adverse effects are due to another mechanism(s) in addition to DNA hypomethylation."( Adverse effects of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine on spermatogenesis include reduced sperm function and selective inhibition of de novo DNA methylation.
Kelly, TL; Oakes, CC; Robaire, B; Trasler, JM, 2007
)
0.34
" In an attempt to design an efficacious and safe prehematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning regimen, we investigated the cytotoxicity of the combination of busulfan (B), melphalan (M), and gemcitabine (G) in lymphoma cell lines in the absence or presence of drugs that induce epigenetic changes."( Epigenetic modifiers enhance the synergistic cytotoxicity of combined nucleoside analog-DNA alkylating agents in lymphoma cell lines.
Andersson, BS; Champlin, RE; Li, Y; Murray, D; Nieto, Y; Valdez, BC; Wang, G, 2012
)
0.38
" Our findings suggest that 5'-aza-dC modulating DNA methylation could sensitize paraquat toxic effects on PC12 cell by oxidative stress increment and mitochondrial deficit."( 5'-Aza-dC sensitizes paraquat toxic effects on PC12 cell.
Ba, M; Kong, M; Liang, H; Ma, L; Wang, Y; Yu, Q; Yu, T, 2012
)
0.38
" Decitabine was tolerated at all doses administered, and grade 3 or 4 toxic effects included non-life-threatening hepatotoxicity and hyperglycaemia."( Safety and clinical activity of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) with or without Hyper-CVAD in relapsed/refractory acute lymphocytic leukaemia.
Benton, CB; Borthakur, G; Dara, S; Franklin, AR; Garcia-Manero, G; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Kwari, M; O'Brien, S; Pierce, SR; Ravandi, F; Rytting, M; Thomas, DA; Yang, H, 2014
)
1.56
" The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were febrile neutropenia (38 [41%] of 93 patients), pneumonia (27 [29%] of 93 patients), thrombocytopenia (23 [25%] of 93 patients), anaemia (23 [25%] of 93 patients), and sepsis (16 [17%] of 93 patients)."( Safety and tolerability of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, randomised, dose-escalation phase 1 study.
Azab, M; Chung, W; Daver, N; Griffiths, EA; Hao, Y; Issa, JJ; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H; Lowder, JN; Naim, S; O'Connell, C; Oganesian, A; Rizzieri, D; Roboz, G; Stock, W; Taverna, P; Tibes, R; Walsh, K; Yee, K, 2015
)
0.71
"1 nm) for 24 hours pretreatment with or without methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and the reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger α-lipoic acid to assess the possible role of methylation and ROS in the toxic effect of TNPs."( Cross talk between poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 methylation and oxidative stress involved in the toxic effect of anatase titanium dioxide nanoparticles.
Bai, W; Chen, Y; Gao, A, 2015
)
0.42
" Safety was evaluated based on treatment related grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs) and early death (ED) rate."( Efficacy and safety of decitabine in treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
He, PF; Lian, XY; Lin, J; Ma, JC; Qian, J; Wen, XM; Xu, ZJ; Yao, DM; Zhang, ZH; Zhou, JD, 2017
)
0.77
" In addressing key issues of reducing toxic side effects and improving pharmacokinetic profiles of the therapeutic agents, we have developed a new formulation by co-packaging DAC and ATO into alendronate-conjugated bone-targeting nanoparticles (BTNPs)."( Bone-targeting nanoparticle to co-deliver decitabine and arsenic trioxide for effective therapy of myelodysplastic syndrome with low systemic toxicity.
Ferrari, M; Hu, Z; Nizzero, S; Ramirez, MR; Shen, H; Shi, C; Wu, X; Zhang, G; Zhou, J, 2017
)
0.72
" Grade 3 to 4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 11 (24."( Phase Ib/II study of safety and efficacy of low-dose decitabine-primed chemoimmunotherapy in patients with drug-resistant relapsed/refractory alimentary tract cancer.
Brock, MV; Chen, M; Feng, K; Guo, M; Han, W; Li, S; Li, X; Liu, Y; Mei, Q; Nie, J; Shi, L; Wu, Z; Zhang, Y, 2018
)
0.73
" The main adverse reaction was hematological toxicity."( [The safety of decitabine as bridging pretreatment regimen before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric hematological malignancies].
Bian, XN; Fan, LY; Hu, SY; Kong, LJ; Li, J; Ling, J; Liu, H; Lu, J; Xiao, PF; Yao, YH, 2018
)
0.83
" In terms of adverse reactions, there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of myelosuppression, pulmonary infection, gastrointestinal reactions, and bleeding events between the 2 groups (P>0."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with CAG (Cytarabine, Aclarubicin, G-CSF) for Patients with Intermediate or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Meta-Analysis].
Cao, YP; Li, JG; Zhang, JL, 2019
)
0.82
" As compared with control group, there was no significant difference in adverse events."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with CAG (Cytarabine, Aclarubicin, G-CSF) for Patients with Intermediate or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Meta-Analysis].
Cao, YP; Li, JG; Zhang, JL, 2019
)
0.82
" The anti-tumor effect and DNA demethylation effect of OR-2003 and OR-2100 were comparable to that of DAC with fewer adverse effects in vivo."( Novel prodrugs of decitabine with greater metabolic stability and less toxicity.
Hattori, N; Iida, N; Kimura, K; Kono, Y; Nakata, Y; Sako, M; Takeshima, H; Ushijima, T, 2019
)
0.85
" These compounds are expected to overcome the difficulty in achieving stable pharmacokinetics in patients, leading to maximum DNA demethylation activity with minimum adverse effects."( Novel prodrugs of decitabine with greater metabolic stability and less toxicity.
Hattori, N; Iida, N; Kimura, K; Kono, Y; Nakata, Y; Sako, M; Takeshima, H; Ushijima, T, 2019
)
0.85
"The CHG priming regimen provided a safe and effective salvage regimen for higher risk MDS patients who were resistant to decitabine."( The efficacy and toxicity of the CHG priming regimen (low-dose cytarabine, homoharringtonine, and G-CSF) in higher risk MDS patients relapsed or refractory to decitabine.
Chang, C; He, Q; Li, X; Song, L; Su, J; Tao, Y; Wu, D; Wu, L; Xiu, C; Xu, F; Zhang, Z; Zhao, Y; Zhou, L, 2019
)
0.92
" The therapentic efficacy and adverse reactions during treatment were compared between 2 groups."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Half-Course Pre-excitation for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Kong, R; Liu, Q; Qiu, HC; Wang, Y; Wu, DH; Wu, PF; Zhang, XL, 2019
)
0.82
" The rate of adverse reactions of digestive tract in combined therapy group was 40."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Half-Course Pre-excitation for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Kong, R; Liu, Q; Qiu, HC; Wang, Y; Wu, DH; Wu, PF; Zhang, XL, 2019
)
0.82
"Combination of disitamine and half-course prestimulation treatmentis is a safe and effective and elderly patients with AML shown a good tolerance."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Half-Course Pre-excitation for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Kong, R; Liu, Q; Qiu, HC; Wang, Y; Wu, DH; Wu, PF; Zhang, XL, 2019
)
0.82
"Our data demonstrated that decitabine was effective and relatively safe in treating MDS and AML."( Decitabine: An effective and safe treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.
Chang, Y; Chen, X; Feng, X; Gao, Y; Huang, J; Li, T; Liu, S; Mao, C; Meng, F; Nie, S; Xiao, S; Yan, X; Zhou, J, 2019
)
2.25
"Neonatal exposure to sevoflurane sensitizes rats to adverse effects of repeated exposure to the anesthetic."( Neonatal exposure to sevoflurane expands the window of vulnerability to adverse effects of subsequent exposure to sevoflurane and alters hippocampal morphology via decitabine-sensitive mechanisms.
Gravenstein, N; Ju, LS; Lei, L; Lin, Y; Martynyuk, AE; Morey, TE; Xu, N; Yang, J, 2020
)
0.75
"D-CAG regimen is safe and effective in the treatment of AML patients ≥70 years old, and can partially improve the prognosis of elderly and high-risk patients."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Modified CAG Regimen in Patients Aged ≥ 70 Years with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Cao, L; Hong, M; Jiang, ZQ; Li, JY; Liu, WJ; Qian, SX; Sun, Q; Zhu, Y, 2023
)
1.22

Pharmacokinetics

The authors review the pharmacokinetic data gained from low-dose decitabine, as well as the clinical progress of decit abine in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. This has greatly limited application of pharmacokinetics assays to clinical development of dec itabine. A population pharmacokinetically model was developed by pooling decit Abine concentration-time data from 5 adult (AML and MDS) and 2 pediatric (AMl) studies.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"A phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dCyd) were conducted in 21 patients with advanced solid tumors."( Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (NSC 127716) in cancer patients.
Gall, HE; Leyva, A; O'Brien, AM; Pinedo, HM; van Groeningen, CJ, 1986
)
0.27
" This has greatly limited application of pharmacokinetic assays to clinical development of decitabine."( Characterization of decomposition products and preclinical and low dose clinical pharmacokinetics of decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine) by a new liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry quantification method.
Byrd, JC; Chan, KK; Grever, M; Liu, Z; Marcucci, G; Xiao, J, 2006
)
0.77
" The mean values for terminal phase elimination half-life (0."( Pharmacokinetics of decitabine administered as a 3-h infusion to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Cashen, AF; DiPersio, J; Fisher, N; Shah, AK; Todt, L, 2008
)
0.67
" Pharmacodynamic analyses included 5-methyl-2'-deoxycytidine levels, MAGE1A CpG island methylation, and fetal hemoglobin (HbF) expression."( Phase I and pharmacodynamic trial of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine and carboplatin in solid tumors.
Appleton, K; Barrett, S; Bellenger, K; Brown, R; Jadayel, D; Judson, I; Kaye, SB; Lee, C; Mackay, HJ; Mackay, L; McCormick, C; Plumb, JA; Reade, S; Schätzlein, A; Setanoians, A; Strathdee, G; Tang, A; Twelves, C, 2007
)
0.57
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
" The authors review the pharmacokinetic data gained from low-dose decitabine, as well as the clinical progress of decitabine in the treatment of hematologic malignancies."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of decitabine for the treatment of leukemia.
Bryan, J; Garcia-Manero, G; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H, 2011
)
0.89
" Pharmacodynamic analysis showed FLT3 down-regulation on day 26 of cycle 1 (P = ."( Clinical and pharmacodynamic activity of bortezomib and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia.
Bloomfield, CD; Blum, W; Byrd, JC; Caligiuri, MA; Chan, KK; Curfman, JP; Devine, SM; Eisfeld, AK; Garr, C; Garzon, R; Geyer, S; Grever, MR; Jacob, S; Kefauver, C; Klisovic, R; Marcucci, G; Perrotti, D; Santhanam, R; Schwind, S; Tarighat, SS; Walker, A; Wang, H; Whitman, S, 2012
)
0.63
" We developed a pharmacodynamic model to characterize the interaction between CLO and DEC on an AML cell line and down-regulated p53R2 protein to understand its role."( Synergism between clofarabine and decitabine through p53R2: a pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction modeling.
Fetterly, GJ; Ghoshal, S; Haese, JP; Karpf, AR; Thudium, KE; Wetzler, M, 2012
)
0.66
" A population pharmacokinetic model was developed by pooling decitabine concentration-time data from 5 adult (AML and MDS) and 2 pediatric (AML) studies."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Decitabine in Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Appiani, C; Massarella, J; Nakahara, S; Nemat, S; Parasrampuria, DA; Poggesi, I; Zhang, L; Zhou, W, 2019
)
1.02

Compound-Compound Interactions

The aim of this study was to compare the differential effects of standard chemotherapy regimens (FEC: 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicine plus cyclophosphamide) in combination with epigenetic modulators (decitabine, valproic acid) The differences of clinical outcome and adverse events were analyzed.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Because of the potentially large antigen load released by such a cell kill, the immune modulator pyran copolymer was also tested in combination with DAC."( Effects of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in combination with the biochemical modulator thymidine or the immune modulator pyran copolymer on L1210 leukemia-bearing mice.
Covey, JM; Zaharko, DS, 1984
)
0.27
" Since most clinical regimens for tumor therapy consist of several drugs, we investigated the antineoplastic action of Ado in combination with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR), a potent inhibitor of DNA methylation or cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C), a potent inhibitor of DNA synthesis."( Evaluation of the antineoplastic activity of adozelesin alone and in combination with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine and cytosine arabinoside on DLD-1 human colon carcinoma cells.
Côté, S; Momparler, RL, 1993
)
0.29
"5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine combined with either amsacrine or idarubicin has been applied in a treatment protocol for patients with a relapse of acute myeloid or lymphocytic leukemia."( A randomized phase II study on the effects of 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine combined with either amsacrine or idarubicin in patients with relapsed acute leukemia: an EORTC Leukemia Cooperative Group phase II study (06893).
Archimbaud, E; Berneman, Z; Dardenne, M; Dohner, H; Jaksic, B; Jehn, U; Labar, B; Louwagie, EA; Muus, P; Stryckmans, P; Suciu, S; Tjean, M; Wijermans, P; Willemze, R; Zittoun, R, 1997
)
0.3
" In this study, we show for the first time that VPA, in combination with RA and the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (Aza-dC), can overcome the epigenetic barriers to transcription of a prototypical silenced tumor suppressor gene, RARbeta2, in human breast cancer cells."( Valproic acid, in combination with all-trans retinoic acid and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, restores expression of silenced RARbeta2 in breast cancer cells.
Gudas, LJ; Mongan, NP, 2005
)
0.33
" These findings suggest that 5-aza-CdR is a promising chemotherapeutical agent for gastric carcinomas, in combination with the anticancer drugs SN38 and GEM, in apoptosis signaling."( Synergic antiproliferative effect of DNA methyltransferase inhibitor in combination with anticancer drugs in gastric carcinoma.
Hirakawa, K; Ohira, M; Ren, J; Yashiro, M; Zhang, X, 2006
)
0.33
" A Phase II study was performed on low-dose decitabine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, in combination with imatinib in patients with CML in accelerated phase (AP) and myeloid blastic phase (BP)."( Phase II study of low-dose decitabine in combination with imatinib mesylate in patients with accelerated or myeloid blastic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Cortes, J; Garcia-Manero, G; Gharibyan, V; Issa, JP; Jones, D; Kantarjian, HM; Morris, GM; O'brien, S; Oki, Y; Verstovsek, S, 2007
)
0.9
"To determine an optimal biologic dose (OBD) of decitabine as a single agent and then the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of valproic acid (VA) combined with decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( Phase I study of decitabine alone or in combination with valproic acid in acute myeloid leukemia.
Blum, W; Byrd, JC; Chan, KK; Devine, H; Devine, SM; Grever, MR; Hackanson, B; Heerema, NA; Huynh, L; Kefauver, C; Klisovic, RB; Liu, S; Liu, Z; Lozanski, G; Marcucci, G; Murgo, A; Plass, C; Vukosavljevic, T, 2007
)
0.94
" HL-60 and T24 cancer cell lines were treated with azacitidine or decitabine in combination with HC and DNA methylation of LRE1, MAGEA1 and CDKN2A was quantitatively measured by bisulphite-polymerase chain reaction pyrosequencing."( Hydroxycarbamide in combination with azacitidine or decitabine is antagonistic on DNA methylation inhibition.
Byun, HM; Choi, SH; Issa, JP; Kwan, JM; Yang, AS, 2007
)
0.83
" These results indicate that decitabine in combination with gemtuzumab is a regimen of promising efficacy worthy of further investigation in controlled trials."( Decitabine combined with fractionated gemtuzumab ozogamicin therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Chowdhury, S; Marks, PW; Seropian, S, 2009
)
2.09
" On the basis of preclinical studies indicating that hypomethylating agents can reverse platinum resistance in ovarian cancer cells, the authors conducted a phase 1 trial of low-dose decitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer."( A phase 1 and pharmacodynamic study of decitabine in combination with carboplatin in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant, epithelial ovarian cancer.
Balch, C; Breen, T; Fang, F; Kulesavage, C; Li, L; Matei, DE; Nephew, KP; Schilder, J; Shen, C; Snyder, AJ; Zhang, S, 2010
)
0.82
"Repetitive low-dose decitabine is tolerated when combined with carboplatin in ovarian cancer patients, and demonstrates biological (ie, DNA-hypomethylating) activity, justifying further testing for clinical efficacy."( A phase 1 and pharmacodynamic study of decitabine in combination with carboplatin in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant, epithelial ovarian cancer.
Balch, C; Breen, T; Fang, F; Kulesavage, C; Li, L; Matei, DE; Nephew, KP; Schilder, J; Shen, C; Snyder, AJ; Zhang, S, 2010
)
0.95
"To investigate the impact of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine(5-aza-CdR) combined with imatinib on the proliferation, motility, invasion, and apoptosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GIST) cells in vitro."( [Therapeutic effect of in vitro 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine combined with imatinib on gastrointestinal stromal tumor].
Liang, G; Liang, JF; Wu, LN; Xiao, H; Zhao, YZ; Zheng, HX, 2012
)
0.38
" Patients were treated with escalating doses of decitabine (5-15 mg/m(2)) IV for 10 days in combination with VPA (10-20 mg/kg/day) PO on days 5-21 of a 28-day cycle."( Phase I study of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in combination with valproic acid in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Aimiuwu, J; Chan, KK; Chu, BF; Grever, MR; Karpenko, MJ; Liu, Z; Otterson, GA; Villalona-Calero, MA, 2013
)
0.65
" We hypothesized that epigenetic modulators will reverse chemotherapy resistance, and in this article, we report studies that sought to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, and efficacy of decitabine (DAC) combined with TMZ."( Safety and efficacy of decitabine in combination with temozolomide in metastatic melanoma: a phase I/II study and pharmacokinetic analysis.
Beumer, JH; Buch, SC; Christner, S; Egorin, MJ; Kirkwood, JM; Lin, Y; Moschos, S; Tarhini, AA; Tawbi, HA, 2013
)
0.89
"This study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low methylation drug decitabine combined with autologous cytokine induced killer cells (CIK) to treat the elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( [Curative effect of decitabine combined with cytokine-induced killer cells in two elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia].
Cai, LL; Chang, C; Fan, H; Guo, B; Han, WD; Li, SX; Lin, J; Liu, Y; Lu, XC; Ran, HH; Wang, Y; Yang, B; Yang, Y; Zhai, B; Zhang, F; Zhang, L; Zhu, HL, 2013
)
0.94
" We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of decitabine (a hypomethylating agent) in combination with panitumumab (mAb against EGFR) in mCRC patients."( A phase I/II study of decitabine in combination with panitumumab in patients with wild-type (wt) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boucher, K; Burr, L; Davidson, C; Garrido-Laguna, I; Gilcrease, W; Jakubowski, L; Jones, D; McGregor, KA; Morrell, G; Olpin, JD; Sharma, S; Soldi, R; Wade, M; Weis, J, 2013
)
0.95
" Future studies evaluating hypomethylating agents in combination with EGFR mAb in patients with mCRC are warranted."( A phase I/II study of decitabine in combination with panitumumab in patients with wild-type (wt) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Boucher, K; Burr, L; Davidson, C; Garrido-Laguna, I; Gilcrease, W; Jakubowski, L; Jones, D; McGregor, KA; Morrell, G; Olpin, JD; Sharma, S; Soldi, R; Wade, M; Weis, J, 2013
)
0.7
"Here we investigated the effect of hydrodynamic IL-35-expressing plasmid injection in combination with a methyltransferase inhibitor (decitabine) on immune function and transplantation tolerance in mice."( Inhibiting cardiac allograft rejection with interleukin-35 therapy combined with decitabine treatment in mice.
Guo, H; He, X; Jiang, X; Wang, W; Zhao, N; Zhu, L, 2013
)
0.82
" Thus, IL-35 gene therapy combined with decitabine provides a novel approach to induce transplantation tolerance."( Inhibiting cardiac allograft rejection with interleukin-35 therapy combined with decitabine treatment in mice.
Guo, H; He, X; Jiang, X; Wang, W; Zhao, N; Zhu, L, 2013
)
0.88
"Decitabine (5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine; DAC) in combination with tetrahydrouridine (THU) is a potential oral therapy for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia."( Subchronic oral toxicity study of decitabine in combination with tetrahydrouridine in CD-1 mice.
Chan, K; Covey, JM; Engelke, K; Ling, Y; Saunthararajah, Y; Sharpnack, D; Terse, P,
)
1.85
" The differences of clinical outcome and adverse events among the patients treated with decitabine combined with DAG regimen, CAG regimen or "3+7" regimen were analyzed."( [Comparative analysis of decitabine combined with DAG regimen and other regimens in treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia].
Chen, Y; Duan, Y; Gu, X; Hao, J; Li, L; Liu, J; Liu, Z; Shen, Z; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Zhao, W, 2014
)
0.93
"Decitabine combined with DAG regimen is effective and well tolerated in refractory/relapsed AML patients who were unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and the patients with low marrow blast counts are more suitable for the application of decitabine combined with DAG regimen."( [Comparative analysis of decitabine combined with DAG regimen and other regimens in treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia].
Chen, Y; Duan, Y; Gu, X; Hao, J; Li, L; Liu, J; Liu, Z; Shen, Z; Wang, L; Wang, Y; Zhao, W, 2014
)
2.15
" The present article describes our experience with ultra-low-dose decitabine combined with infusion of autologous cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells for 2 elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-transformed AML."( Ultra-low-dose decitabine combined with autologous cytokine-induced killer cells for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia transformed from myelodysplastic syndrome.
Cai, L; Chi, X; Li, S; Lu, X; Tuo, S; Wang, H; Wang, X; Wu, X; Yang, B; Yang, Y; Yu, R; Zhang, F; Zhu, H, 2014
)
0.99
"2 mg/kg three times weekly for 2 weeks (starting on day 1), in combination with oral panobinostat 10, 20, or 30 mg every 96 h (starting on day 8), and oral temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/day on days 9 through 13."( Treatment of resistant metastatic melanoma using sequential epigenetic therapy (decitabine and panobinostat) combined with chemotherapy (temozolomide).
Deutsch, J; Frees, M; Laux, D; Leon-Ferre, R; Milhem, M; Smith, BJ; Xia, C, 2014
)
0.63
"This triple agent of dual epigenetic therapy in combination with traditional chemotherapy was generally well tolerated by the cohort and appeared safe to be continued in a Phase II trial."( Treatment of resistant metastatic melanoma using sequential epigenetic therapy (decitabine and panobinostat) combined with chemotherapy (temozolomide).
Deutsch, J; Frees, M; Laux, D; Leon-Ferre, R; Milhem, M; Smith, BJ; Xia, C, 2014
)
0.63
"This study was aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of relapsed-refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with AML1-ETO⁺, and its therapeutic efficacy and side effects when decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen was used."( [Clinical efficacy of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for relapsed-refractory acute myeloid leukemia with AML1-ETO⁺].
Jing, Y; Liu, SY; Niu, JH; Yang, H; Yu, L; Zhang, Q; Zhu, CY; Zhu, HY, 2014
)
0.91
"This study was purposed to compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of low-dose decitabine combined with CAG regimen (aclarubicin, Ara-C, and G-CSF) and CAG regimen alone in intermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and evaluate the validity and efficacy of the former regimen as new treatment method of intermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes."( [Comparison of clinical efficacy between decitabine combined with CAG regimen and CAG regimen alone in patients with intermediate to high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes].
Cui, GX; Wu, WZ; Zhang, YP, 2014
)
0.89
" The aim of the study presented here was to analyze the effects of a pharmacological inhibition of EZH2 alone and in combination with other anticancer drugs on RTs cells in vitro."( Analysis of the antiproliferative effects of 3-deazaneoplanocin A in combination with standard anticancer agents in rhabdoid tumor cell lines.
Borchardt, C; Clemens, D; Dirksen, U; Frühwald, MC; Kool, M; Unland, R, 2015
)
0.42
"Treating MDS/AML with decitabine alone, in combination with half or one course CAG regimen produced high efficacy."( [The clinical efficacy of the patients of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes treated with decitabine alone, combined with half or one couse of CAG regimen].
Chen, S; Fu, Z; Gao, S; Han, Y; Jin, Z; Ma, X; Qiu, H; Sun, A; Tang, X; Wu, D, 2014
)
0.93
"This study was to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness and side effect of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for relapse or refractory patients with acute myeloid leukemia."( [Clinical resarch of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia].
Jing, Y; Liu, SY; Niu, JH; Yang, H; Yu, L; Zhang, Q; Zhu, CY; Zhu, HY, 2015
)
0.96
"After treatment by using decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen, 7 patients achived complete remission, 1 patient achived partial remission, 2 patient did not achieve remission, the overall remission rate was 80% (8/10), the median time of white blood cell count recovery was 18."( [Clinical resarch of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia].
Jing, Y; Liu, SY; Niu, JH; Yang, H; Yu, L; Zhang, Q; Zhu, CY; Zhu, HY, 2015
)
1.04
"The treatment of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for relapsed and refractory AML shows high response rate, low side effects, so it worthy to further clinical study."( [Clinical resarch of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen for treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia].
Jing, Y; Liu, SY; Niu, JH; Yang, H; Yu, L; Zhang, Q; Zhu, CY; Zhu, HY, 2015
)
1.08
"All patients in this study were treated with decitabine of 15 mg/m2 for 5 days and G-CSF for priming, in combination with cytarabine of 10-mg/m2 q12h for 7 days and aclarubicin of 10 mg/day for 4 days (D-CAG)."( Efficacy and safety of decitabine in combination with G-CSF, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in newly diagnosed elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen, Y; Ding, J; Duan, L; Gu, J; Hong, M; Li, J; Li, Y; Liu, P; Lu, H; Pan, L; Qian, S; Qiu, H; Shi, J; Wang, J; Wu, H; Xu, J; Xu, Y; Yu, K; Zhang, R; Zhang, S; Zhou, J; Zhou, S; Zhu, H; Zhu, Y, 2015
)
0.99
" In this open-label, phase I/II clinical study, we analyzed the toxicity and efficacy of low dose decitabine combined with taxol and platinum chemotherapy in treatment of refractory and recurrent ovarian cancer."( Low Dose Decitabine Combined with Taxol and Platinum Chemotherapy to Treat Refractory/Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase I/II Study.
Chen, M; Fu, X; Han, W; Meng, Y; Nie, J; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Zhang, Y, 2015
)
1.05
"Low dose decitabine combined with taxol and platinum was well-tolerated and suitable for treating refractory/refractory ovarian cancer."( Low Dose Decitabine Combined with Taxol and Platinum Chemotherapy to Treat Refractory/Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase I/II Study.
Chen, M; Fu, X; Han, W; Meng, Y; Nie, J; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Zhang, Y, 2015
)
1.25
" Patients are randomized to one of the four treatment groups: DAC alone or in combination with VPA or ATRA or with both add-on drugs."( DECIDER: prospective randomized multicenter phase II trial of low-dose decitabine (DAC) administered alone or in combination with the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in patients >60 years with acute mye
Cieslik, C; Döhner, K; Grishina, O; Hackanson, B; Lübbert, M; Lubrich, B; May, AM; Müller, MJ; Schmoor, C, 2015
)
0.65
"To investigate the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of treating patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-RAEB (MDS-RAEB) and with refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by using decitabine combined with CAG regimen."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen for Myelodysplastic Syndrome-RAEB and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Cao, YB; DA, WM; Li, SW; Li, XH; Liu, B; Liu, ZY; Wu, XX; Wu, YM; Xu, LX; Yan, B; Yang, XL, 2015
)
0.92
" All the patients received decitabine combined with CAG regimen consisting of decitabine 20 mg/(m(2) · d), d 1-5; aclarubicin 10 mg/d, d 6-13; cytarabine 20 mg/d, d 6-19; G-CSF 300 µg/d, d 6-19."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen for Myelodysplastic Syndrome-RAEB and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Cao, YB; DA, WM; Li, SW; Li, XH; Liu, B; Liu, ZY; Wu, XX; Wu, YM; Xu, LX; Yan, B; Yang, XL, 2015
)
1.03
"Decitabine combined with CAG regimen is effective and safe for treatment of MDS-RAEB and refractory AML patients, which can prolong lives of patiens with refractory hematological diseases."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen for Myelodysplastic Syndrome-RAEB and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Cao, YB; DA, WM; Li, SW; Li, XH; Liu, B; Liu, ZY; Wu, XX; Wu, YM; Xu, LX; Yan, B; Yang, XL, 2015
)
2.17
"We conducted a study exploring the clinical safety and efficacy of decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), combined with a complex karyotype."( Decitabine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Which Combined with Complex Karyotype Respectively.
Chen, SN; Fu, JH; Gao, S; Han, Y; Hu, XH; Jin, ZM; Li, Z; Qiu, HY; Sun, AN; Tang, XW; Wu, DP; Xu, Y, 2015
)
2.1
"From April 2009 to September 2013, a total of 35 patients with AML/MDS combined with a complex karyotype diagnosed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were included for retrospective analysis."( Decitabine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Which Combined with Complex Karyotype Respectively.
Chen, SN; Fu, JH; Gao, S; Han, Y; Hu, XH; Jin, ZM; Li, Z; Qiu, HY; Sun, AN; Tang, XW; Wu, DP; Xu, Y, 2015
)
1.86
"Decitabine alone or combination with AAG can improve outcome of AML/MDS with a complex karyotype, there being no significant difference decitabine in inducing remission rates in patients with different karyotype."( Decitabine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Which Combined with Complex Karyotype Respectively.
Chen, SN; Fu, JH; Gao, S; Han, Y; Hu, XH; Jin, ZM; Li, Z; Qiu, HY; Sun, AN; Tang, XW; Wu, DP; Xu, Y, 2015
)
3.3
"In this study we retrospectively analyzed 53 refractory or relapsed CN- AML patients receiving the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG and CAG- like regimen in our center from April 2011 to October 2014."( [Outcomes of refractory or relapsed DNMT3A + cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia patients followed the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen].
Chen, S; Qiu, H; Shen, H; Sun, A; Sun, Y; Wu, D; Xu, Y; Yang, Z, 2015
)
0.83
"Decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen was an effective and safe treatment for refractory or relapsed CN- AML patients."( [Outcomes of refractory or relapsed DNMT3A + cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia patients followed the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen].
Chen, S; Qiu, H; Shen, H; Sun, A; Sun, Y; Wu, D; Xu, Y; Yang, Z, 2015
)
2.06
" We conducted a prospective study of 23 elderly patients (median age, 68 years; range, 60 to 87 years) with newly diagnosed AML to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of decitabine plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming, low-dose aclarubicin, and cytarabine (DCAG) chemotherapy combined with HLA-mismatched stem cell microtransplantation (SC-MST) without graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis."( Decitabine before Low-Dose Cytarabine-Based Chemotherapy Combined with Human Leukocyte Antigen-Mismatched Stem Cell Microtransplantation Improved Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Chen, Y; Huang, J; Li, J; Li, Y; Lian, Y; Qian, S; Wu, Y; Xie, Y; Zhang, X; Zhao, H; Zhu, Y, 2017
)
2.09
"To investigate the clinical efficacy of decitabine combined with low-dose IA for treating patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-EB."( [Clinical Observation of Therapeutic Regimen Consisted of Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose IA Regimen for Myelodysplastic Syndrome-EB].
Hao, JX; Li, J; Wu, D; Zhang, M, 2017
)
0.97
"To investigate the clinical efficacy of low-dose decitabine combined with CAG regimen in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome-refractory anemia with excess blasts (MDS-RAEB) through retrospective analysis."( [Clinical Efficacy of Low-dose Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts(MDS-RAEB)].
Guo, R; Han, HH; Jiang, ZX; Liu, YF; Sun, H; Wang, M, 2017
)
1
"Thirty-six patients with MDS-RAEB who ever received low-dose decitabine combined with CAG regimen were enrolled into decitabine + CAG group and 40 patients with MDS-RAEB treated by decitabine alone in our center were enolled into the control group."( [Clinical Efficacy of Low-dose Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts(MDS-RAEB)].
Guo, R; Han, HH; Jiang, ZX; Liu, YF; Sun, H; Wang, M, 2017
)
0.98
"Low-dose decitabine combined with CAG regimen has better clinical efficacy for patients with MDS-RAEB than that of decitabine alone."( [Clinical Efficacy of Low-dose Decitabine Combined with CAG Regimen in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome-refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts(MDS-RAEB)].
Guo, R; Han, HH; Jiang, ZX; Liu, YF; Sun, H; Wang, M, 2017
)
1.16
"To investigate the curative effect and safety of decitabine combined with IAG regimen for treating senile MDS-transformed AML patients."( [Curative Effect of Decitabine Combined with IAG Regimen for Senile Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Transformed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Guo, XZ; Huang, YQ; Pan, JX; Wu, SX; Zhang, XY, 2017
)
1.03
"Decitabine combined with IAG regimen is an effective for treating senile MDS-transformed AML patients."( [Curative Effect of Decitabine Combined with IAG Regimen for Senile Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Transformed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Guo, XZ; Huang, YQ; Pan, JX; Wu, SX; Zhang, XY, 2017
)
2.22
"To investigate the therapeutic effectiveness and side effects of decitabine combined with or without cytarabine-based low dose regimen for acute myeloid leukemia in geratic patients."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with or without Cytarabine-based Low Dose Regimen for Senile patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
DU, Y; Jing, Y; Li, PF; Liu, M; Peng, CJ; Sun, JZ; Wang, ZH; Yao, YB; Zhou, HW; Zhou, MH, 2018
)
1.03
"Decitabine combined with or without cytarabine-based low dose regimen is promising for the treatment of geriatric acute myeloid leukemia, thus improving the overall response rate, and prolonging overall survival time."( [Clinical Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with or without Cytarabine-based Low Dose Regimen for Senile patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
DU, Y; Jing, Y; Li, PF; Liu, M; Peng, CJ; Sun, JZ; Wang, ZH; Yao, YB; Zhou, HW; Zhou, MH, 2018
)
2.24
"We retrospectively studied 87 patients aged from 55 to 69 years old with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received decitabine in combination with G-CSF, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin (DCAG) or standard dose chemotherapy as induction therapy."( Decitabine in combination with G-CSF, low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin is as effective as standard dose chemotherapy in the induction treatment for patients aged from 55 to 69 years old with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.
Hong, M; Huang, J; Li, J; Lian, Y; Qian, S; Wu, Y; Zhang, X; Zhao, H; Zhao, X; Zhu, Y, 2018
)
2.13
"To develop new rehabilitation therapies for chronic stroke, this study examined the effectiveness of task-specific training (TST) and TST combined with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor in chronic stroke recovery."( Effect of Inhibition of DNA Methylation Combined with Task-Specific Training on Chronic Stroke Recovery.
Choi, DH; Choi, IA; Kim, HY; Lee, CS; Lee, J, 2018
)
0.48
"To investigate the efficacy of domestic decitabine (D) combined with pre-excitation chemotherapy consisted of Ara-c, THP and G-CSF(CTG) in treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with MDS-transformed AML and prognosis-related factors."( [Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with Pre-Excitation Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly MDS Transformed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
He, JX; Jiang, YR; Lai, YC; Li, K; Li, ZK; Liu, SY, 2018
)
1.12
"The short-and long-term efficacy of domestic decitasine combined with preexcitation chenotherapy in treatment of middec-aged and eldery patients with MDS transformed AML is superior to single pre-excitation chenothrapy, moreover the incidence of adverse reactions did not increase."( [Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with Pre-Excitation Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly MDS Transformed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
He, JX; Jiang, YR; Lai, YC; Li, K; Li, ZK; Liu, SY, 2018
)
0.85
"The aim of our study was to investigate the strategy of immune tolerance induced by the demethylating drug decitabine (DAC) combined with multiple allogeneic bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMMNC) infusions."( Immune Tolerance Induced by Decitabine Combined With Multiple Allogeneic Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Infusion.
Dai, J; Huang, X; Li, C; Wang, C; Yang, X; Zhu, B; Zhu, Y, 2018
)
0.99
"DAC combined with multiple allogeneic BMMNC infusion could successfully induce specific immune tolerance in mice, which may provide some new strategies to improve immune tolerance after organ transplant."( Immune Tolerance Induced by Decitabine Combined With Multiple Allogeneic Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Infusion.
Dai, J; Huang, X; Li, C; Wang, C; Yang, X; Zhu, B; Zhu, Y, 2018
)
0.77
" The case of a 58-year-old female patient with AML transformed from PMF, who was treated with decitabine combined with all-trans retinoic acid, is reported."( Decitabine combined with all-trans retinoic acid as treatment in a case of primary myelofibrosis transforming into acute myeloid leukaemia.
Cao, Y; Dong, W; Gu, W; Lin, R; Lin, Y; Liu, Y; Xie, X; Zhou, G, 2019
)
2.18
" In this study, we report the effects of single reagent DAC therapy and DAC combined with BZM on β-catenin accumulation, myeloma cell survival, apoptosis, and treatment sensitivity."( Synergistic Efficacy of the Demethylation Agent Decitabine in Combination With the Protease Inhibitor Bortezomib for Treating Multiple Myeloma Through the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway.
Chen, X; Dong, B; Feng, J; Gao, G; Gu, H; Jin, Y; Shu, M; Wu, X; Xu, L; Zhang, J, 2019
)
0.77
"PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of decitabine combined with CAG regimen for intermediate or high risk MDS and AML from inception to March, 2018."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with CAG (Cytarabine, Aclarubicin, G-CSF) for Patients with Intermediate or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Meta-Analysis].
Cao, YP; Li, JG; Zhang, JL, 2019
)
1.02
"The objective of this research was to characterize the venetoclax exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety relationships and determine its optimal dose in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving venetoclax in combination with low intensity therapies (hypomethylating agent [HMA; azacitidine or decitabine] or low-dose cytarabine [LDAC])."( Optimizing venetoclax dose in combination with low intensive therapies in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: An exposure-response analysis.
Agarwal, S; Friedel, A; Gopalakrishnan, S; Hayslip, J; Kirschbrown, W; Menon, R; Mensing, S; Potluri, J; Salem, AH, 2019
)
0.69
" Multivariate analysis indicated that the combination with DAC was independent factor for CR rate after the first induction therapy (OR = 2."( A favorable inductive remission rate for decitabine combined with chemotherapy as a first course in <60-year-old acute myeloid leukemia patients with myelodysplasia syndrome features.
Huang, B; Li, J; Liu, F; Liu, J; Su, C; Tong, X; Wang, H; Xu, D; Zheng, D; Zhou, Z; Zou, W, 2019
)
0.78
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with half-course pre-excitation for the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Half-Course Pre-excitation for the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Kong, R; Liu, Q; Qiu, HC; Wang, Y; Wu, DH; Wu, PF; Zhang, XL, 2019
)
1.09
"To retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of low dose subcutaneous decitabine combined with arsenic trioxide in patients with intermediate or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)."( [The safety and efficacy of low dose subcutaneous decitabine combined with arsenic trioxide in patients with inermediate or higer-risk myelodysplastic syndrome].
Ai, H; Chen, L; Mi, RH; Song, YP; Wang, Q; Wei, XD; Yin, QS, 2019
)
1
"DNA-hypomethylating agents are studied in combination with other epigenetic drugs, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors or differentiation inducers (eg, retinoids), in myeloid neoplasias."( Valproate and Retinoic Acid in Combination With Decitabine in Elderly Nonfit Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized, 2 × 2, Phase II Trial.
Becker, H; Brugger, W; Bug, G; Crysandt, M; De Wit, M; Döhner, H; Döhner, K; Duyster, J; Ganser, A; Germing, U; Giagounidis, A; Götze, KS; Grishina, O; Hackanson, B; Heil, G; Heuser, M; Jost, E; Krauter, J; Kuendgen, A; Lindemann, HW; Lübbert, M; May, AM; Müller-Tidow, C; Neubauer, A; Salih, HR; Schittenhelm, MM; Schlenk, RF; Schmoor, C; Scholl, S; Schwaenen, C; Thol, F; Wäsch, R, 2020
)
0.81
"To study the efficacy of small dose HAG combined with decitabine regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( [Efficacy of Small Dose HAG Regimen Combined with Decitabine in Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Luo, ZQ; Pan, PJ, 2020
)
1.06
" The AML patients in CAG group was treated with CAG regimen, while the AML patients in combined treatment group was treated with small dose HAG regimen combined with decitabine."( [Efficacy of Small Dose HAG Regimen Combined with Decitabine in Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Luo, ZQ; Pan, PJ, 2020
)
1.01
"Small dose HAG regimen combined with decitabine for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia has a certain curative efficacy."( [Efficacy of Small Dose HAG Regimen Combined with Decitabine in Treatment of Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Luo, ZQ; Pan, PJ, 2020
)
1.08
" However, there are no studies on the use of cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA‑4) monoclonal antibody in combination with the melanoma‑associated antigen A family (MAGE‑As) co‑antigen peptide (p248V9) for treating breast cancer, which should be explored."( CTLA‑4 blockade combined with 5‑aza‑2'‑deoxycytidine enhances the killing effect of MAGE‑A family common antigen peptide‑specific cytotoxic T cells on breast cancer.
Hao, X; Li, W; Sang, M; Shan, B; Wu, Y, 2020
)
0.56
"To investigate the effects of decitabine combined with bortezomib on the proliferation of mantle cell lymphoma cell lines (Jeko-1 and Grante519) in vitro and explore the underlying mechanisms."( [Effects of Decitabine Combined with Bortezomib on the Proliferation of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines and Its Underling Mechanisms].
Chen, D; Guo, XN; Li, Y; Qiao, SK; Xing, LN; Zhang, JN, 2020
)
1.23
" Compared with single-drug treatment group, DAC combined with BTZ significantly increased the inhibitory rate and apoptotic rate of Jeko-1 and Grante519 cells; PCDH8, Caspase 3 and BAX expression levels significantly increased, and the expression levels of NF-κB, BCL-2 and CCND1 significantly decreased in Jeko-1 and Grante519 cells."( [Effects of Decitabine Combined with Bortezomib on the Proliferation of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines and Its Underling Mechanisms].
Chen, D; Guo, XN; Li, Y; Qiao, SK; Xing, LN; Zhang, JN, 2020
)
0.94
" This phase 1 trial investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and anti-leukemic activity of volasertib in combination with decitabine in AML patients aged ≥ 65 years."( Phase 1 dose escalation trial of volasertib in combination with decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Borthakur, G; Cortes, J; Fagan, N; Kantarjian, H; Podoltsev, N; Rajeswari, S; Stahl, M; Taube, T; Uy, GL; Zeidan, AM, 2021
)
1.06
"We recommend the "venetoclax + HMAs combined with dose-adjusted CAH/HAG" regimen as an effective treatment for adult R/RAML."( Venetoclax + hypomethylating agents combined with dose-adjusted HAG for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: Two case reports.
Bai, J; Lian, X; Pei, Z; Song, Q; Wang, H; Wang, J; Zhang, B, 2020
)
0.56
"To evaluate the efficacy of decitabine combined with low-dose CEG regimen (DCEG) and decitabine combined with low-dose CAG regimen (DCAG) in the treatment of elderly patients with MDS and MDS-transformed acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( [Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Elderly Patients with High-Risk MDS and MDS-Transformed AML between Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CEG Regimen and Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CAG Regimen].
He, HS; Hua, JS; Li, F; Ma, IX; Wang, XH; Wang, XQ; Wu, M; Xie, YH; Yang, RY; Ye, XJ, 2020
)
1.06
" The treament results of decitabine combined with CEG and decitabine combined with CAG were compared."( [Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Elderly Patients with High-Risk MDS and MDS-Transformed AML between Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CEG Regimen and Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CAG Regimen].
He, HS; Hua, JS; Li, F; Ma, IX; Wang, XH; Wang, XQ; Wu, M; Xie, YH; Yang, RY; Ye, XJ, 2020
)
1.07
"Decitabine combined with CEG regimen could improve the survival of patients with high-risk MDS and MDS-transformed AML."( [Comparison of the Curative Efficacy of Elderly Patients with High-Risk MDS and MDS-Transformed AML between Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CEG Regimen and Decitabine Combined with Low-Dose CAG Regimen].
He, HS; Hua, JS; Li, F; Ma, IX; Wang, XH; Wang, XQ; Wu, M; Xie, YH; Yang, RY; Ye, XJ, 2020
)
2.21
" The aim of this study was to compare the differential effects of standard chemotherapy regimens (FEC: 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicine plus cyclophosphamide) in combination with epigenetic modulators (decitabine, valproic acid): (a) on gene methylation levels of selected tumour biomarkers (LINE-1, uPA, PAI-1, DAPK); (b) their expression status (uPA and PAI-1); (c) differentiation status (5meC and H3K27me3)."( Epigenetic modulators combination with chemotherapy in breast cancer cells.
Akgun, O; Ari, F; Magdolen, V; Napieralski, R; Ulukaya, E, 2021
)
0.81
" Herein, we reported the first case with DEK/CAN-positive AML who achieved complete remission of molecular biology via decitabine combined with a medium-dose cytarabine regimen."( Decitabine combined with medium-dose cytarabine in the treatment of DEK/CAN-positive acute myeloid leukemia: a case report.
Zhang, X, 2021
)
2.27
" We evaluated two new lower-intensity regimens with clofarabine (n = 119) or cladribine (n = 129) combined with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) alternating with decitabine."( Long-term results of low-intensity chemotherapy with clofarabine or cladribine combined with low-dose cytarabine alternating with decitabine in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.
Borthakur, G; Burger, J; Daver, N; DiNardo, CD; Estrov, Z; Ferrajoli, A; Garcia-Manero, G; Huang, X; Jabbour, E; Jain, N; Kadia, TM; Kanagal-Shamanna, R; Kantarjian, H; Konopleva, M; Pemmaraju, N; Pierce, S; Popat, U; Rausch, C; Ravandi, F; Verstovsek, S; Wang, X, 2021
)
1.02
" However, the synergistic inhibitory effect of Smo inhibitor jervine and its combination with decitabine in MUTZ-1 cell lines remains lacking."( Synergistic inhibitory effect of Smo inhibitor jervine and its combination with decitabine can target Hedgehog signaling pathway to inhibit myelodysplastic syndrome cell line.
Hao, JP; Jiang, M; Qin, YT; Tuerxun, N; Wang, H; Wang, J; Yao, L; Zhao, F, 2021
)
1.07
"The Smo inhibitor jervine and its combination with decitabine have a synergistic effect on the proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis of MUTZ-1 cells, and its mechanism may be achieved by interfering with the Shh signaling pathway."( Synergistic inhibitory effect of Smo inhibitor jervine and its combination with decitabine can target Hedgehog signaling pathway to inhibit myelodysplastic syndrome cell line.
Hao, JP; Jiang, M; Qin, YT; Tuerxun, N; Wang, H; Wang, J; Yao, L; Zhao, F, 2021
)
1.1
" Here, we investigated whether proscillaridin A exhibits epigenetic and anticancer activity against eRMS RD cells, overexpressing MYC oncogene, and its combination with decitabine."( Repurposing proscillaridin A in combination with decitabine against embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma RD cells.
Caron, M; Djibo, R; Huot, M; Najmanovich, R; Raynal, NJM; Richer, C; Sinnett, D; St-Onge, P, 2021
)
1.07
" In addition, proscillaridin A produced synergistic growth inhibition and loss of clonogenicity when combined with the approved DNA demethylating drug decitabine."( Repurposing proscillaridin A in combination with decitabine against embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma RD cells.
Caron, M; Djibo, R; Huot, M; Najmanovich, R; Raynal, NJM; Richer, C; Sinnett, D; St-Onge, P, 2021
)
1.07
"Proscillaridin A produces anticancer and epigenetic effects in the low nanomolar range and its combination with decitabine warrants further investigation for the treatment of eRMS."( Repurposing proscillaridin A in combination with decitabine against embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma RD cells.
Caron, M; Djibo, R; Huot, M; Najmanovich, R; Raynal, NJM; Richer, C; Sinnett, D; St-Onge, P, 2021
)
1.09
"To analyze the evaluation of artificial intelligence algorithm combined with gastric computed tomography (CT) image in clinical chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, 112 patients with advanced gastric cancer were selected as the research object."( Segmentation of Gastric Computerized Tomography Images under Intelligent Algorithms in Evaluation of Efficacy of Decitabine Combined with Paclitaxel in Treatment of Gastric Cancer.
Ge, Z; Liu, Q; Wang, M, 2021
)
0.83
"To investigate the effects of decitabine (DEC) combined with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) on the number of immune cells, efficacy and adverse reactions in the treatment of myeloid neoplasms patients."( [The Effects of Decitabine Combined with All-Trans Retinoic Acid on the Number of Immune Cells in Myeloid Neoplasms].
Cao, Y; Dong, WM; Gu, WY; Guo, YT; Lin, RR; Lin, Y; Liu, Y; Shang, LM; Wang, F; Wei, W, 2022
)
1.36
"Eighty-four patients with myeloid tumors, including AML, MDS-EB-1 or MDS-EB-2 treated by the regimen containing decitabine in our hospital from January 2009 to October 2019 were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed, among the patients, 21 patients treated with DEC alone, 24 patients treated with DEC combined with ATRA (DEC/ATRA) and 39 patients treated with DEC combined with G-CSF priming regimen (DEC/priming)."( [The Effects of Decitabine Combined with All-Trans Retinoic Acid on the Number of Immune Cells in Myeloid Neoplasms].
Cao, Y; Dong, WM; Gu, WY; Guo, YT; Lin, RR; Lin, Y; Liu, Y; Shang, LM; Wang, F; Wei, W, 2022
)
1.28
" We demonstrated the synergism of [Bis + ABT199/venetoclax] in combination with panobinostat (Pano), decitabine (DAC), or olaparib (Ola), known inhibitors of BCL2, histone deacetylase, DNA methyltransferase, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, respectively, in AML cells."( Enhanced cytotoxicity of bisantrene when combined with venetoclax, panobinostat, decitabine and olaparib in acute myeloid leukemia cells.
Andersson, BS; Murray, D; Nieto, Y; Popat, U; Valdez, BC; Yuan, B, 2022
)
1.16
"We analyzed the treatment effects of chidamide and decitabine in combination with a HAG (homoharringtonine, cytarabine, G-CSF) priming regimen (CDHAG) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with TP53 mutation."( Chidamide and Decitabine in Combination with a HAG Priming Regimen for Acute Myeloid Leukemia with TP53 Mutation.
Bai, J; Pei, Z; Song, Q; Wang, H; Wang, J; Wu, H; Zhang, B, 2022
)
1.33
"Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with azacitidine or decitabine (hypomethylating agent; HMA) is the standard-of-care treatment for older (≥75 years) or intensive chemotherapy ineligible adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( Tumor lysis syndrome and infectious complications during treatment with venetoclax combined with azacitidine or decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Arora, S; Bachiashvili, K; Bathini, S; Bhatia, R; Di Stasi, A; Diamond, B; Godby, K; Gupta, U; Jamy, O; Oliver, JD; Rangaraju, S; Salzman, D; Vachhani, P; Worth, S; Zainaldin, C, 2022
)
1.18
"The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence, sites and main pathogens, and risk factors for infectious complications occurring in patients with adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) during the first course of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine."( A real-world study of infectious complications of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in adult acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen, RR; Jin, J; Li, L; Mai, WY; Meng, HT; Qian, JJ; Sun, JN; Tong, HY; Wang, LL; Xie, WZ; Ye, XJ; Yu, WJ; Zhang, Y; Zhu, HH; Zhu, LX, 2022
)
1.13
"A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of 81 patients with AML older than 14 years who received the first cycle of venetoclax combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) between March 2018 and March 2021 at our institution."( A real-world study of infectious complications of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in adult acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen, RR; Jin, J; Li, L; Mai, WY; Meng, HT; Qian, JJ; Sun, JN; Tong, HY; Wang, LL; Xie, WZ; Ye, XJ; Yu, WJ; Zhang, Y; Zhu, HH; Zhu, LX, 2022
)
0.95
"Compared with conventional chemotherapy, the incidence of infectious complications of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine significantly decreased."( A real-world study of infectious complications of venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in adult acute myeloid leukemia.
Chen, RR; Jin, J; Li, L; Mai, WY; Meng, HT; Qian, JJ; Sun, JN; Tong, HY; Wang, LL; Xie, WZ; Ye, XJ; Yu, WJ; Zhang, Y; Zhu, HH; Zhu, LX, 2022
)
1.16
" Low-dose chemotherapy in combination with decitabine or azacitidine showed a similar response rate and prognosis."( Hypomethylating agents combined with low-dose chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: a real-world clinical experience.
Cao, J; Chen, Y; Hu, J; Luo, L; Yang, T; Yang, X; Ye, Y; Zheng, J; Zheng, X; Zheng, Z, 2023
)
1.17
"This analysis aimed to assess the effect of decitabine combined with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in treating recurrent and refractory acute myeloid leukemia."( Efficacy of decitabine combined with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of recurrent and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, J; Zhang, D, 2022
)
1.36
"Decitabine combined with allo-HSCT can obtain lower recurrence risk and longer disease-free survival time, and improve the prognosis of patients."( Efficacy of decitabine combined with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of recurrent and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, J; Zhang, D, 2022
)
2.54
" This trial investigated the efficacy of decitabine in combination with rituximab, cisplatin, cytarabine, dexamethasone (RDHAP) in R/R-DLBCL."( Decitabine combined with RDHAP regimen in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma.
Chen, Q; Ding, M; Dong, M; Feng, X; Fu, X; Kong, X; Li, L; Li, X; Sun, Z; Wang, X; Wu, X; Yan, J; Zhang, L; Zhang, M; Zhang, X; Zhu, L, 2023
)
2.62
"To investigate the biological effects and its relative mechanism of decitabine combined with anlotinib on multiple myeloma cells."( [Effects of Decitabine Combined with Anlotinib on Proliferation and Apoptosis of Multiple Myeloma Cells].
Cao, Y; Chen, HJ; Gu, WY; Liu, Y; Shang, LM; Yang, HN; Yue, YH, 2023
)
1.52
"Decitabine combined with anlotinib can effectively inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis of MM cells, which provides a certain experimental basis for the treatment of human MM."( [Effects of Decitabine Combined with Anlotinib on Proliferation and Apoptosis of Multiple Myeloma Cells].
Cao, Y; Chen, HJ; Gu, WY; Liu, Y; Shang, LM; Yang, HN; Yue, YH, 2023
)
2.73
"To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of decitabine combined with modified CAG regimen (D-CAG regimen) in patients aged ≥70 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( [Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Modified CAG Regimen in Patients Aged ≥ 70 Years with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia].
Cao, L; Hong, M; Jiang, ZQ; Li, JY; Liu, WJ; Qian, SX; Sun, Q; Zhu, Y, 2023
)
1.47
"To explore the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with decitabine, homoharringtonine, and interferon regimen as maintenance therapy for blast phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-BP)."( [Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Combined with Decitabine, Homoharringtonine, Interferon in the Maintenance Therapy of Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia].
Li, ZY; Song, YP; Zhang, YL; Zhao, HF, 2023
)
1.39
" Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in TKI combined with decitabine, homoharringtonine, interferon group had longer event-free survival (7."( [Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Combined with Decitabine, Homoharringtonine, Interferon in the Maintenance Therapy of Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia].
Li, ZY; Song, YP; Zhang, YL; Zhao, HF, 2023
)
1.39
"The TKI combined with decitabine, homoharringtonine and interferon regimen can significantly prolong the survival of CML-BP patients who obtained the major hematological response compared with TKI combined with conventional chemotherapy regimen."( [Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Combined with Decitabine, Homoharringtonine, Interferon in the Maintenance Therapy of Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia].
Li, ZY; Song, YP; Zhang, YL; Zhao, HF, 2023
)
1.47

Bioavailability

Decitabine is a DNA methyltransferase 1 inhibitor or DNA hypomethylating compound. It is not readily orally bioavailable because of rapid clearance by cytidine deaminase (CDA) in the gut and liver. Tetrahydrouridine and decitabin were rapidly absorbed into the systemic circulation after a single combination oral dose.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" However, it exhibits a low oral bioavailability (only 9% in mice), because of low permeability across the intestine membrane and rapid metabolism to inactive metabolite."( A carrier-mediated prodrug approach to improve the oral absorption of antileukemic drug decitabine.
Fan, R; Gao, Y; He, Z; Jin, L; Lian, H; Liu, J; Sun, J; Sun, Y; Xu, Y; Zhang, T; Zhang, Y, 2013
)
0.61
"As an initial step towards the clinical translation of these drugs for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, we synthesized decitabine and gemcitabine prodrugs in order to increase drug permeability, which has generally been shown to correlate with increased bioavailability in vivo."( Characterization of permeability, stability and anti-HIV-1 activity of decitabine and gemcitabine divalerate prodrugs.
Bonnac, L; Clouser, CL; Mansky, LM; Patterson, SE, 2014
)
0.84
" Tetrahydrouridine, a competitive inhibitor of cytidine deaminase, was used in the combination to improve oral bioavailability of DAC."( Subchronic oral toxicity study of decitabine in combination with tetrahydrouridine in CD-1 mice.
Chan, K; Covey, JM; Engelke, K; Ling, Y; Saunthararajah, Y; Sharpnack, D; Terse, P,
)
0.41
" Appropriate delivery systems able to enrich Decitabine at the site of action and improve its bioavailability would reduce the incidence of toxicity on healthy tissues."( Novel epigenetic target therapy for prostate cancer: a preclinical study.
Cinti, C; Gherardini, L; Grimaldi, S; Naldi, I; Pani, L; Pelosi, G; Taranta, M; Viglione, F, 2014
)
0.66
"Decitabine, a DNA methyltransferase 1 inhibitor or DNA hypomethylating compound, is not readily orally bioavailable because of rapid clearance by cytidine deaminase (CDA) in the gut and liver."( An oral fixed-dose combination of decitabine and cedazuridine in myelodysplastic syndromes: a multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 study.
Amrein, PC; Azab, M; DeZern, AE; Faderl, S; Garcia-Manero, G; Harb, W; Kantarjian, H; Lowder, J; Michaelis, LC; Odenike, O; Oganesian, A; Savona, MR; Steensma, DP, 2019
)
2.24
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" Venetoclax (ABT-199) is a novel, orally bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), a key regulator of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway."( Venetoclax and decitabine for treatment of relapsed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A case report and review of literature.
Adams, CB; Farhadfar, N; Li, Y; May, WS, 2021
)
0.97
" The development of oral HMAs has been an area of active interest; however, oral bioavailability has been quite poor due to rapid metabolism by cytidine deaminase (CDA)."( Cedazuridine/decitabine: from preclinical to clinical development in myeloid malignancies.
Cahill, K; Odenike, O; Patel, AA; Saygin, C, 2021
)
0.99
" Recently, two orally bioavailable DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, CC-486 and ASTX727, were approved."( Silylation of Deoxynucleotide Analog Yields an Orally Available Drug with Antileukemia Effects.
Fukuda-Kurahashi, Y; Harada, H; Hattori, N; Hayashi, Y; Kamachi, K; Kawaguchi, A; Kimura, S; Kurahashi, Y; Okada, S; Tohyama, K; Ureshino, H; Ushijima, T; Watanabe, T; Yamamoto, Y; Yamashita, S; Yoshida-Sakai, N, 2021
)
0.62
"Tetrahydrouridine and decitabine were rapidly absorbed into the systemic circulation after a single combination oral dose, with relative bioavailability of decitabine ≥74% in fasted males compared with separate oral administration of THU followed by decitabine 1 h later."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an oral formulation of decitabine and tetrahydrouridine.
Clausen, WHO; Friedrich, U; Jacobberger, JW; Lau, H; Saunthararajah, Y; Woost, PG, 2023
)
1.46

Dosage Studied

Decitabine dosed at 15 mg/m2 iv every 8 h for 3 days resulted in a predictable and manageable toxicity profile in patients with MDS/AML. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) was 152-163 ng h/ml.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"In mammals, X-chromosome dosage compensation is achieved by inactivating one X chromosome in female cells."( Effect of ageing on reactivation of the human X-linked HPRT locus.
Axelman, J; Beggs, AH; Migeon, BR, 1988
)
0.27
" For aza-dC a dose-response relationship was demonstrated for doses up to 50 mg kg-1 (3 times q 12 h); a higher dose resulted in only a slight increase in median survival time (MST)."( Comparison of the antileukaemic activity of 5 aza-2-deoxycytidine and arabinofuranosyl-cytosine in rats with myelocytic leukaemia.
Colly, LP; Lurvink, E; Richel, DJ; Willemze, R, 1988
)
0.27
" The present study was designed to determine the effect of repeated decitabine dosing on HbF levels and hematologic toxicity over a 9-month treatment period."( Maintenance of elevated fetal hemoglobin levels by decitabine during dose interval treatment of sickle cell anemia.
Bressler, L; DeSimone, J; Dorn, L; Koshy, M; Lavelle, D; Molokie, R; Talischy, N, 2002
)
0.8
" Responders were treated at all three decitabine dose levels, and no dose-response correlation was observed."( Long-term follow-up of a phase I study of high-dose decitabine, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide plus allogeneic transplantation for the treatment of patients with leukemias.
Andersson, B; Champlin, R; Couriel, D; de Lima, M; Donato, M; Gajewski, J; Giralt, S; Kantarjian, H; Khouri, I; Ravandi, F; Shahjahan, M; van Besien, K, 2003
)
0.84
" There was no evidence of a dose-response effect."( Results of decitabine (5-aza-2'deoxycytidine) therapy in 130 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Andreeff, M; Cortes, J; Faderl, S; Garcia-Manero, G; Giles, FJ; Issa, JP; Kantarjian, HM; Keating, M; O'Brien, S; Rios, MB; Shan, J; Talpaz, M, 2003
)
0.71
" Chronic dosing and sustained increases in hemoglobin F and total hemoglobin levels may be possible."( Effects of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine on fetal hemoglobin levels, red cell adhesion, and hematopoietic differentiation in patients with sickle cell disease.
Bressler, L; Chen, YH; DeSimone, J; Dorn, L; Gavazova, S; Hillery, CA; Hoffman, R; Lavelle, D; Molokie, R; Saunthararajah, Y, 2003
)
0.32
" This information sparked further clinical trials using a lower dosing schedule since the original studies using higher doses were associated with significant myelosuppression and induction toxicity."( Decitabine dosing schedules.
Issa, JP; Kantarjian, HM, 2005
)
1.77
" Decitabine appears to be a promising new therapy for the treatment of MDS; however, defining the optimal dosing schedule and exploring the possible use in combination with other agents such as the histone deacetylase inhibitors need further evaluation."( Decitabine in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Saba, HI; Wijermans, PW, 2005
)
2.68
" Dose-response correlations and the duration of response to aza-deoxycytidine (ADC) and trichostatin A (TSA) were characterized."( Epigenetic-mediated upregulation of progesterone receptor B gene in endometrial cancer cell lines.
Dowdy, SC; Eberhardt, NL; Gonzalez Bosquet, J; Jiang, SW; Podratz, KC; Xiong, Y; Zhao, Y, 2005
)
0.33
" One example of epigenetic gene regulation is dosage compensation of the X chromosome in mammalian females."( X-inactivation status varies in human embryonic stem cell lines.
Baetge, EE; Batten, JL; Carpenter, MK; Hall, L; Hoffman, LM; Lawrence, J; Pardasani, D; Young, H,
)
0.13
"Since appropriate dosing schedules of decitabine are being investigated, comparison of the clinical effectiveness of 5-AzaC and decitabine would be premature at this time."( 5-azacytidine and decitabine monotherapies of myelodysplastic disorders.
Kuykendall, JR, 2005
)
0.93
"MTT method and flow cytometry were used to detect the growth and apoptosis of Daudi cells after treated with different dosage of 5-Aza-CdIR."( [SHP-1 gene's methylation status of Daudi lymphoma cell and the demethylation effect of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine].
Fang, JC; Feng, ZY; He, D; He, XL; Li, L; Qiu, G; Su, ZL; Zhu, MF, 2006
)
0.33
"The PK of this dosing regimen was evaluated in sixteen patients with MDS or AML."( Pharmacokinetics of decitabine administered as a 3-h infusion to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Cashen, AF; DiPersio, J; Fisher, N; Shah, AK; Todt, L, 2008
)
0.67
"0 ng/ml, and the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity), 152-163 ng h/ml, were unchanged during dosing of decitabine for 3 days."( Pharmacokinetics of decitabine administered as a 3-h infusion to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Cashen, AF; DiPersio, J; Fisher, N; Shah, AK; Todt, L, 2008
)
0.87
"Decitabine dosed at 15 mg/m2 iv every 8 h for 3 days resulted in a predictable and manageable toxicity profile in patients with MDS/AML."( Pharmacokinetics of decitabine administered as a 3-h infusion to patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Cashen, AF; DiPersio, J; Fisher, N; Shah, AK; Todt, L, 2008
)
2.11
" Ongoing studies are evaluating alternative dosing schedules for these drugs and the activity and safety of this class of agent in combination with histone deacetylase inhibitors."( Use of hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Atallah, E; Garcia-Manero, G, 2007
)
0.34
" Since these low-dose regimens are well-tolerated with minimal toxicity, they are suitable for chronic dosing to maintain promoter hypomethylation and expression of target genes."( Oral decitabine reactivates expression of the methylated gamma-globin gene in Papio anubis.
Chin, J; Desimone, J; Hankewych, M; Lavelle, D; Phiasivongsa, P; Redkar, S; Roxas, B; Saunthararajah, Y; Singh, M; Tang, C; Vaitkus, K; Will, R, 2007
)
0.85
" Our data show that, in addition to gene dosage changes arising from LOI and hypermethylation-induced gene silencing, gene activation resulting from hypomethylation is also prevalent in WTs."( Hypomethylation and aberrant expression of the glioma pathogenesis-related 1 gene in Wilms tumors.
Baker, JA; Brown, KW; Chilukamarri, L; Dallosso, AR; Greenhough, A; Hancock, AL; Huang, TH; Malik, K; Malik, S; Royer-Pokora, B; Zabkiewicz, J, 2007
)
0.34
" Recent clinical trials investigate new dosing schedules, routes of administration, and combination regimens."( Current status of epigenetic treatment in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Kuendgen, A; Lübbert, M, 2008
)
0.35
" Optimizing dosing schedules of decitabine to maximize hypomethylation (low dose, high dose intensity, and multiple cycles) have further improved results, suggesting that decitabine is an active therapy that alters the natural course of MDS."( Evolution of decitabine development: accomplishments, ongoing investigations, and future strategies.
Garcia-Manero, G; Issa, JP; Jabbour, E; Kantarjian, H, 2008
)
1
" Further research is needed to determine the appropriate patient selection and dosing schedules."( Review: recent clinical trials in epigenetic therapy.
Issa, JP; Oki, Y, 2006
)
0.33
" This study assessed the efficacy and safety of an alternative dosing regimen administered on an outpatient basis in academic and community-based practices."( Multicenter study of decitabine administered daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to adults with myelodysplastic syndromes: the alternative dosing for outpatient treatment (ADOPT) trial.
Albitar, M; Arora, S; Baer, MR; Buckstein, R; Cullen, MT; Garcia-Manero, G; Godley, LA; Kantarjian, H; Larsen, JS; Slack, JL; Steensma, DP, 2009
)
0.67
" Recent clinical trials have been investigating new dosing schedules, routes of administration, and combination of decitabine with other agents, including histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors."( Decitabine.
Blagitko-Dorfs, N; Daskalakis, M; Hackanson, B, 2010
)
2.01
" The present results show the applicability of our novel statistical methodology for quantitatively assessing drug synergy across a wide range of doses of agents with complex dose-response profiles, a methodology with great potential for advancing the development of chemopreventive combinations."( Validation of a novel statistical model for assessing the synergy of combined-agent cancer chemoprevention.
Fujimoto, J; Hong, WK; Kong, M; Lee, JJ; Lotan, R, 2010
)
0.36
" The hydralazine dose was given according with the acetylator phenotype, and valproate was dosed at 30 mg/kg/day."( Hydralazine and magnesium valproate as epigenetic treatment for myelodysplastic syndrome. Preliminary results of a phase-II trial.
Arias-Bofill, D; Candelaria, M; Cervera, E; de la Cruz-Hernández, E; Dueñas-Gonzalez, A; González-Fierro, A; Herrera, A; Labardini, J; Pérez-Cárdenas, E; Taja-Chayeb, L; Trejo-Becerril, C; Vidal, S, 2011
)
0.37
" Hence, the study on the systems reported herein could provide a good basis for designing aza nucleoside prodrug systems that are less hydrophilic than their parental drugs and can be used, in different dosage forms, to release the parent drug in a controlled manner."( Prodrugs of aza nucleosides based on proton transfer reaction.
Karaman, R, 2010
)
0.36
" However, the sequential schedule of decitabine 10 mg/m(2)/day on days 1 to 5 and vorinostat 200 mg twice a day on days 6 to 12 was more deliverable than both MTDs with fewer delays on repeated dosing and it represents the recommended phase II (RP2D) dose of this combination."( Phase I study of decitabine in combination with vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.
Chen, EX; Egorin, MJ; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Hirte, HW; Holleran, JL; Hotte, SJ; Laughlin, A; McGill, S; Moretto, P; Oza, AM; Siu, LL; Stathis, A; Stayner, LA; Wang, L; Webster, S; Zhang, WJ, 2011
)
0.98
" The US Food and Drug Administration has approved a 5-day outpatient decitabine dosing regimen, which might reduce administration costs compared with the standard 3-day inpatient regimen."( Economic analysis of decitabine versus best supportive care in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes from a US payer perspective.
Fleurence, R; Kim, E; Knopf, K; Linnehan, JE; Pan, F; Peng, S, 2010
)
0.91
"The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of 5-day dosing of decitabine versus BSC in US patients with intermediate- and high-risk MDS from a US payer perspective."( Economic analysis of decitabine versus best supportive care in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes from a US payer perspective.
Fleurence, R; Kim, E; Knopf, K; Linnehan, JE; Pan, F; Peng, S, 2010
)
0.91
"In this study, decitabine administered on a 5-day dosing schedule was likely a cost-effective treatment option in patients with intermediate- and high-risk MDS from a US payer perspective."( Economic analysis of decitabine versus best supportive care in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes from a US payer perspective.
Fleurence, R; Kim, E; Knopf, K; Linnehan, JE; Pan, F; Peng, S, 2010
)
1.03
" Most importantly, the elevated gene dosage of DNMT3B is associated with increased resistance to the growth-inhibitory effect mediated by DNA demethylating agents."( DNMT3B gene amplification predicts resistance to DNA demethylating drugs.
Esteller, M; Melo, SA; Simó-Riudalbas, L, 2011
)
0.37
" The present study assessed an effective treatment dosage based on the cell viability, cytotoxicity, apoptosis and methylation assays for the investigated cell lines."( Integrated epigenetics of human breast cancer: synoptic investigation of targeted genes, microRNAs and proteins upon demethylation treatment.
Barekati, Z; Bitzer, J; Grussenmeyer, T; Hartmann, N; Jenoe, P; Kohler, C; Lefkovits, I; Letzkus, M; Moes, S; Radpour, R; Schumacher, MM; Staedtler, F; Zhong, XY, 2011
)
0.37
" Over the years, the dosing of decitabine has been refined, such that for acute myeloid leukemia, a 5-day schedule of 20 mg/m(2) is now commonly utilized."( Decitabine for acute myeloid leukemia.
Marks, PW, 2012
)
2.11
" Treatment with valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, at 3 dosing regimens (300mg/kg at D2-9PP; 100mg/kg at D2-4PP, 200mg/kg at D5-7PP, 300mg/kg at D8-9PP; 100mg/kg at D2-5PP, 200mg/kg at D6-9PP) prior to daily separation reversed such a decrease in fear-potentiated startle."( Neonatal isolation decreases cued fear conditioning and frontal cortical histone 3 lysine 9 methylation in adult female rats.
Chen, LH; Cheng, LY; Cherng, CG; Kao, GS; Su, CC; Tzeng, WY; Wang, CY; Yu, L, 2012
)
0.38
" This novel dosing schedule has yet to be evaluated in a Phase 3 trial."( The role of decitabine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.
Ganetsky, A, 2012
)
0.76
"5-AZn-2' deoxycytidylic acid had significant inhibition effect on proliferation of A549 cells in vitro, and the inhibition was notably dependent on time and dosage during 48-72 h; SOD level was significantly lower than those of control group (P<0."( Effect of 5- AZn-2 '-deoxycytidine on proliferation of human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 in vitro.
Cui, W; Huang, HQ; Li, N; Zhang, GS, 2013
)
0.39
" A total of 79 patients received reduced dosage decitabine treatment (15 mg/M2/day intravenously for five consecutive days every four weeks)."( Decitabine of reduced dosage in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a retrospective analysis.
Chang, C; Chen, Y; Hou, M; Li, X; Song, L; Song, Q; Su, J; Wu, D; Wu, L; Xu, F; Zhang, X; Zhang, Z; Zhou, L, 2014
)
2.1
" Recent and ongoing clinical trials investigate new dosing schedules, routes of administration, and combination of decitabine with other agents, including histone deacetylase inhibitors."( Decitabine.
Daskalakis, M; Hackanson, B, 2014
)
2.06
" We summarize the results of recent preclinical studies and clinical trials for decitabine and discuss the connections among its hypomethylating effect, immune-activated mechanisms and clinical activity in solid tumors, keeping in mind the goal of optimizing dosing schedules."( Decitabine: a promising epi-immunotherapeutic agent in solid tumors.
Fu, X; Han, W; Li, X; Mei, Q; Nie, J, 2015
)
2.09
"1% and 30-month overall survival rate after decitabine dosing 61."( [Therapeutic efficacies of decitabine application prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia].
Fu, C; Han, Y; Jin, Z; Liu, H; Ma, L; Miao, M; Qiu, H; Tang, X; Wang, J; Wang, P; Wu, D; Yan, S; Zheng, H; Zhou, J, 2015
)
0.98
" The 5-AZA-CdR was selected as a representative demethylation agent to validate the principle of the TDQ method on three levels: significant dose-response relationships between the concentration of 5-AZA-CdR and the methylation level of promoters, mRNA expression level of the EGFP gene, and the fluorescence intensity of EGFP proteins."( A novel quantification method for the total demethylation potential of aquatic sample extracts from Bohai Bay using the EGFP reporter gene.
Guo, C; Han, M; Jiang, Y; Liang, B; Lv, Z; Nie, J; Qian, Y; Wang, X; Wei, Y; Wu, J; Yang, Y; Zhang, J, 2015
)
0.42
"Our results provide an alternative approach for predicting what combinations, dosing and scheduling of drug delivery should be used to better individualize therapy of AML."( Synergisitic and Antagonistic AML Cell Type-specific Responses to 5-Aza-2-deoxycitidine and 1-h-D-Arabinofuranoside.
Arceci, RJ; Elmoneim, AA; Heuston, E; Triche, T; Wai, DH, 2016
)
0.43
"X-chromosome inactivation is a mechanism of dosage compensation in which one of the two X chromosomes in female mammals is transcriptionally silenced."( A high-throughput small molecule screen identifies synergism between DNA methylation and Aurora kinase pathways for X reactivation.
Bartolomei, MS; Bedalov, A; Carrette, LL; Dial, TO; Hasaka, T; Jadhav, A; Kesner, B; Lee, JT; Lessing, D; Maloney, DJ; Payer, B; Simeonov, A; Szanto, A; Theriault, J; Wei, C, 2016
)
0.43
" To aid clinicians in their daily clinical practice, we also comment on some practical aspects such as dosing and schedule, the choice of HMA and the use of complementary cellular therapies."( Hypomethylating agents for treatment and prevention of relapse after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation.
Germing, U; Haas, R; Kobbe, G; Rautenberg, C; Schroeder, T, 2018
)
0.48
" Several dose-response experiments were carried out during two periods, including not only the very first days of development (0-6 days post-fertilization, dpf), as done in previous studies, but also, and as a novelty, the period of gonadal development (10-30 dpf)."( Treatment with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor feminizes zebrafish and induces long-term expression changes in the gonads.
Imués, MA; Piferrer, F; Ribas, L; Vanezis, K, 2017
)
0.46
" After accounting for body size, decitabine pharmacokinetics were not affected by age, sex, race, dosing regimen, renal function (creatinine clearance), bilirubin, or disease type (AML or MDS) and all PK parameters (including clearance, steady-state volume of distribution, maximum concentration, time to reach maximal concentration, and terminal half-life) were comparable between adult and pediatric patients."( Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Decitabine in Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Appiani, C; Massarella, J; Nakahara, S; Nemat, S; Parasrampuria, DA; Poggesi, I; Zhang, L; Zhou, W, 2019
)
1.06
" The current dosing regimen consists of one administration per day, for 5 days, each 4 weeks."( Di-
Bejaud, J; Bou Haidar, N; Briot, T; Guillet, C; Lagarce, F; Lautram, N; Legeay, S; Roger, E; Thépot, S, 2019
)
0.51
"Epigenetic reprogramming using DNA demethylating drugs is a promising approach for cancer therapy, but its efficacy is highly dependent on the dosing regimen."( Low-dose DNA demethylating therapy induces reprogramming of diverse cancer-related pathways at the single-cell level.
Hattori, N; Takeshima, H; Ushijima, T; Wakabayashi, M; Yamashita, S; Yoda, Y, 2020
)
0.56
"Design and development of efficient processes for continuous manufacturing of solid dosage oral formulations is of crucial importance for pharmaceutical industry in order to implement the Quality-by-Design paradigm."( Experimental and thermodynamic modeling decitabine anti cancer drug solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide.
Borousan, F; Hezave, AZ; Jamshidian, S; Marjani, A; Pishnamazi, M; Shirazian, S; Zabihi, S, 2021
)
0.89
" However, as the efficacy and safety of rational dosing regimens are lacking, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose azacitidine (AZA) vs."( Evaluation of Reduced-Dose Decitabine and Azacitidine for Treating Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Retrospective Study.
Du, X; Hu, N; Pan, L; Qin, T; Qu, S; Wang, B; Wang, X; Xiao, Z; Xu, Z, 2021
)
0.92
" Both HMAs led to objective hematologic or non-hematologic AEs (27%-43%), while dosage modification/delay were more frequent in patients treated with azacitidine (81% vs."( Hypomethylating agents in the treatment of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Deng, C; Du, X; Geng, S; Huang, X; Li, M; Weng, J; Wu, P; Xu, R, 2021
)
0.62
" Although extended dosing may provide the optimal scheduling, the reliance of injectable formulation of the drug limits it to intermittent treatment."( Optimizing DNA hypomethylating therapy in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.
Lane, SW; Straube, J; Vu, T, 2021
)
0.62
"In this study, we perform dose-response curves of decitabine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, on patient-cultured tumors and meningioma cell lines."( Targeting DNA Methyl Transferases with Decitabine in Cultured Meningiomas.
Damek, DM; Foreman, WB; Fringuello, AR; Graner, MW; Jensen, RL; Lillehei, KO; Ormond, DR; Scherer, SR; Tatman, PD; Wroblewski, TH; Youssef, AS, 2022
)
1.24
"Combination therapy has become the hallmark of lung cancer treatment, as it reduces the dosage intensity of individual drugs while increasing their efficacy."( The combination of decitabine and aspirin inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.
Li, N; Song, B; Xu, M; Yang, X, 2022
)
1.05
" In this review, we discuss the path to regulatory approval of azacitidine and decitabine, highlighting the substantial efforts that have been made to optimize the dosing schedule and administration of these drugs, including the development of new, oral formulations of both agents."( Hypomethylating agents for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia: Past discoveries and future directions.
Kantarjian, H; Short, NJ, 2022
)
0.95
" Venetoclax treatment variables included dosing information, schedule modifications, and drug-drug interactions."( Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agents as First-line Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Patients with AML in a Predominately Community Setting in the US.
Abbas, JA; Bui, CN; Donnellan, W; Flahavan, EM; Flores, B; Gershon, A; Jin, H; Ku, G; Ma, E; Montez, M; Onishi, M; Vachhani, P; Xu, T, 2022
)
0.72
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
2'-deoxyribonucleoside
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (3)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Disease1278231
Diseases of programmed cell death3611
Defective pyroptosis47

Protein Targets (30)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, Beta-lactamaseEscherichia coli K-12Potency112.20200.044717.8581100.0000AID485294
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency17.68740.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521; AID1159523
ATAD5 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.58020.004110.890331.5287AID504466
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.14000.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency16.78550.000417.946075.1148AID1346795
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.22180.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259255; AID1259256
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.83250.000214.376460.0339AID720692
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency6.74000.000817.505159.3239AID1159527
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.17610.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224841; AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259403
farnesoid X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.59010.375827.485161.6524AID743217
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.41420.000229.305416,493.5996AID743069; AID743075; AID743078
67.9K proteinVaccinia virusPotency6.78330.00018.4406100.0000AID720579; AID720580
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency79.43280.006026.168889.1251AID540317
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.32250.00419.984825.9290AID504444
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.01789.637444.6684AID588834
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency5.69860.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743066; AID743067
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.23110.004611.374133.4983AID624297
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.23710.002319.595674.0614AID651631
Spike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusPotency19.95260.009610.525035.4813AID1479145
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.18830.011917.942071.5630AID651632
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.18830.011912.222168.7989AID651632
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
exodeoxyribonuclease V subunit RecBEscherichia coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655IC50 (µMol)118.45400.10000.10000.1000AID652151
exodeoxyribonuclease V subunit RecCEscherichia coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655IC50 (µMol)118.45400.10000.10000.1000AID652151
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.03000.01861.64886.0000AID1505769
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)10.00000.00251.14809.2000AID1505768
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (209)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA methylation-dependent heterochromatin formationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-templated transcriptionDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
methylationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
epigenetic programming of gene expressionDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expression via chromosomal CpG island methylationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amino acid stimulusDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromosomal DNA methylation maintenance following DNA replicationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to bisphenol ADNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell proliferationDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell apoptotic processDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vascular associated smooth muscle cell differentiation involved in phenotypic switchingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to starvationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA replicationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA methylation-dependent heterochromatin formationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
synaptonemal complex assemblyHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
spermatid developmentHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
long-term memoryHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
fertilizationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-lysine dimethylationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein modification processHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
organ growthHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
phenotypic switchingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expression via chromosomal CpG island methylationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
oocyte developmentHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron fate specificationHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
response to fungicideHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to cocaineHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of autophagosome assemblyHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of B cell proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
isotype switchingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypesATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloadingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (72)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase activityDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
methyl-CpG bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-methyltransferase activityDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
protein-lysine N-methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
histone H3K9 methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
histone H3K27 methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
C2H2 zinc finger domain bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
histone H3K56 methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
histone H3K9me2 methyltransferase activityHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloader activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (44)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
female germ cell nucleusDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
pericentric heterochromatinDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusDNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1Homo sapiens (human)
virion membraneSpike glycoproteinSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear speckHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase EHMT2Homo sapiens (human)
Elg1 RFC-like complexATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (101)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID620534Reactivation of MeCp2 mutant expression in human GM11272 cells after 6 days by PCR method2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 21, Issue:18
Clonal Rett Syndrome cell lines to test compounds for activation of wild-type MeCP2 expression.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1505768Inhibition of human G9a using biotinylated-H3K9 peptide as substrate after 1 hr in presence of SAM by TR-FRET assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Discovery of Reversible DNA Methyltransferase and Lysine Methyltransferase G9a Inhibitors with Antitumoral in Vivo Efficacy.
AID1298358Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as reduction in U5-gag level at 0.25 to 8 uM after 2 to 72 hrs by qPCR method2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1447872Inhibition of DNMT in human HCT116 cells assessed as demethylation of CDKN2A promoter at 100 nM after 7 days by COBRA analysis relative to control2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-08, Volume: 60, Issue:11
Rational Design of Bisubstrate-Type Analogues as Inhibitors of DNA Methyltransferases in Cancer Cells.
AID700045Antiviral activity against HIV1 infected in human U373-MAGI cells expressing CXCR4 assessed as frequency of viral mutagenesis at 70 nM preincubated for 2 hrs prior to infection followed by compound wash out measured after 48 hrs by flow cytometry relative2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Anti-HIV-1 activity of resveratrol derivatives and synergistic inhibition of HIV-1 by the combination of resveratrol and decitabine.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1298425Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Pol mutation at 3.8 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 18.5%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1199274Half life in patient with myelodysplastic syndrome dosed via infusion2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-26, Volume: 58, Issue:6
Targeting DNA methylation with small molecules: what's next?
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1298427Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Env mutation at 3.8 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 21.4%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID699924Antiviral activity against HIV1 infected in human U373-MAGI cells expressing CXCR4 assessed as infected host cells at 70 nM preincubated for 2 hrs prior to infection followed by compound wash out measured after 48 hrs by single round replication assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Anti-HIV-1 activity of resveratrol derivatives and synergistic inhibition of HIV-1 by the combination of resveratrol and decitabine.
AID1505769Inhibition of human DNMT1 using polydeoxyinosine polydeoxycytosine DNA as substrate after 15 mins in presence of SAM by TR-FRET assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Discovery of Reversible DNA Methyltransferase and Lysine Methyltransferase G9a Inhibitors with Antitumoral in Vivo Efficacy.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1447880Inhibition of DNMT in human KG1 cells assessed as CpG site demethylation at CMV promoter at 1 uM after 24 hrs by NOMe-Seq method relative to control2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-08, Volume: 60, Issue:11
Rational Design of Bisubstrate-Type Analogues as Inhibitors of DNA Methyltransferases in Cancer Cells.
AID1298426Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Vif mutation at 3.8 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 19.2%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID98149Compound was tested for its inhibitory activity against L1210 lymphoid leukemia1987Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 30, Issue:2
Synthesis and antitumor activity of fluorine-substituted 4-amino-2(1H)-pyridinones and their nucleosides. 3-Deazacytosines.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1298294Reduction in dCTP level in human U373-MAGI cells at EC75 after 4 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1298428Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Nef mutation at 3.8 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 22.6%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1447881Inhibition of DNMT in human KG1 cells assessed as increase in DNA accessibility by opening the chromatin at 1 uM after 24 hrs by NOMe-Seq method relative to control2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-08, Volume: 60, Issue:11
Rational Design of Bisubstrate-Type Analogues as Inhibitors of DNA Methyltransferases in Cancer Cells.
AID1298424Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as Gag mutation at 3.8 uM incubated for 2 hrs prior to infection measured at 72 hrs post infection by illumina sequencing method (Rvb = 18.4%)2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1298416Antiviral activity against VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1 NL4-3 infected in human U373-MAGI cells assessed as reduction in gag level at 0.25 to 8 uM after 2 to 72 hrs by qPCR method2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Synergistic reduction of HIV-1 infectivity by 5-azacytidine and inhibitors of ribonucleotide reductase.
AID1447871Inhibition of DNMT in human HCT116 cells assessed as demethylation of CDKN2A promoter at 100 nM after 3 days by COBRA analysis relative to control2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-08, Volume: 60, Issue:11
Rational Design of Bisubstrate-Type Analogues as Inhibitors of DNA Methyltransferases in Cancer Cells.
AID620532Reactivation of MeCp2 mutant expression in human GM11272 cells at 1 to 100 nM by PCR method2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 21, Issue:18
Clonal Rett Syndrome cell lines to test compounds for activation of wild-type MeCP2 expression.
AID1347110qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for A673 cells)2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347119qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347117qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347115qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347125qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347121qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347112qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347118qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347122qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347111qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347124qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347123qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347116qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347109qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347127qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347114qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347128qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347113qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347129qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347126qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (3,733)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-1990103 (2.76)18.7374
1990's160 (4.29)18.2507
2000's1120 (30.00)29.6817
2010's1868 (50.04)24.3611
2020's482 (12.91)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 67.14

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index67.14 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.30 (2.92)
Research Growth Index5.31 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index118.85 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (67.14)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials205 (5.39%)5.53%
Reviews278 (7.31%)6.00%
Case Studies104 (2.73%)4.05%
Observational7 (0.18%)0.25%
Other3,210 (84.38%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (399)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim (AMG 531) Treatment of Subjects With Low or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Receiving Hypomethylating Agents [NCT00321711]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-01Completed
A Single Arm, Phase 2 Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Maintenance Therapy With Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With f High-risk Myeloid Malignancies. [NCT05841771]Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Decitabine in Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT01098084]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Induction Therapy With Decitabine and Plerixafor Priming for Patients ≥ 60 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01352650]Phase 171 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-17Completed
Phase I Study Targeting DNA Methyltransferases in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [NCT05673200]Phase 124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-25Recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Tagraxofusp in Combination With Decitabine for Patients With Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT05038592]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-04Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Belinostat and SGI-110 (Guadecitabine) or ASTX727 for the Treatment of Unresectable and Metastatic Conventional Chondrosarcoma [NCT04340843]Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-08Suspended(stopped due to Other - Completed stage 1 accrual)
Phase I-Ib/II Open-label Multi-center Study of the Safety and Efficacy of MBG453 as Single Agent and in Combination With PDR001 in Adult Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT02608268]Phase 1/Phase 2252 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-23Terminated(stopped due to Business reasons)
Phase I Study of TK216 in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Leukemias [NCT03752138]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The supporting pharamceutical company elected not to pursue this study at this time.)
Use of Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Following Azacitidine (AZA) Failure [NCT01133886]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-09-30Recruiting
An Open Label, Single Arm, Single-Center Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Selinexor and HAAG +/- HMA in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Leukemia (AML) Patients [NCT05805072]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-01Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Study of Decitabine Maintenance in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Who Can Tolerate Aggressive Therapy [NCT01149408]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Targeted Demethylation to Enhance Response or Overcome Resistance to EGFR Blocking Agents in KRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Sequential Decitabine and Panitumumab [NCT00879385]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Extension Study for Participants Who Participated in Prior Clinical Studies of ASTX727 (Standard Dose), With a Food Effect Substudy at Select Study Centers [NCT04093570]Phase 2332 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-30Enrolling by invitation
Single Arm, Open Label, Phase I Study for Dose and Schedule Finding of Decitabine in Patients With Higher-risk MDS and MDS/AML Receiving Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01277484]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1b Study to Evaluate the Effect of Food on Pharmacokinetics of ASTX727 (Cedazuridine and Decitabine) in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03813186]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-08Completed
Decitabine Plus mBU/CY Preconditioning for Relapse/Refractory Acute Leukemia Patients Undergoing HSCT [NCT03799224]Phase 2/Phase 355 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-01Recruiting
Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion After Allo-PBSCT for Patients With Very High-risk Hematologic Malignancies [NCT03771222]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase I/II Combination Study of Sapacitabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT01211457]Phase 1/Phase 265 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-17Recruiting
A Clinical Trial of Decitabine in Relapse and Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma [NCT03579082]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-01Recruiting
A Phase II Multicenter Open-label Study to Assess the Efficacy of Decitabine in the Treatment of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT01251627]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Prospective Phase II Study of Decitabine Induction Therapy to Reduce Pre-transplant Disease Burden Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myelodysplastic Syndromes. [NCT01333449]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor subject accrual)
An Expanded Access Program for Decitabine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT01026376]0 participants Expanded Access2008-06-30No longer available
A Clinical Trial of Decitabine Combined With CODOX-M/IVAC in Relapsed or Refractory T-lymphoblastic Lymphoma [NCT03558412]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind Phase 3 Study of Vadastuximab Talirine (SGN-CD33A) Versus Placebo in Combination With Azacitidine or Decitabine in the Treatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02785900]Phase 3240 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Due to safety; specifically a higher rate of deaths, including fatal infections, in the SGN33A arm versus the control arm)
A Phase II Study of Tosedostat in Combination With Either Cytarabine or Decitabine in Newly Diagnosed AML or High-Risk MDS [NCT01567059]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Phase Ib/II Study of the Safety and Activity of Digoxin With Decitabine in Adult AML and MDS [NCT03113071]Phase 1/Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-02Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Research for Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT03184935]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Suspended(stopped due to Others)
A Phase I Study of Intravenous Decitabine in Combination With Arsenic Trioxide and Ascorbic Acid in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00671697]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Multi-center Study of Low-dose Decitabine for the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia [NCT01568333]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Triplet Therapy With Navitoclax, Venetoclax, and Decitabine for High-risk Myeloid Malignancies [NCT05455294]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-18Recruiting
Clinical Efficacy Observation of Demethylated Drug Decitabine in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma [NCT03701451]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-28Recruiting
HEC73543 Versus Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory FLT3-ITD Acute Myeloid Leukemia: a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase 3 Trial [NCT05586074]Phase 3324 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-03Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Pevonedistat (TAK-924) and Decitabine Combination Therapy in High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03009240]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-21Active, not recruiting
Phase 1b/2 Study of Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine (ASTX727) and Venetoclax in Combination With the Targeted Mutant IDH1 Inhibitor Ivosidenib or the Targeted Mutant IDH2 Inhibitor Enasidenib [NCT04774393]Phase 1/Phase 284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-24Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Label Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Galinpepimut-S (GPS) Maintenance Monotherapy Compared to Investigator's Choice of Best Available Therapy in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Achieved Complete Remission After Second [NCT04229979]Phase 3140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-08Recruiting
A Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Genotype-guided R-CHOP-X Versus R-CHOP in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT05351346]Phase 31,100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
Phase II Study of Venetoclax With Alternative Hypomethylating Agent for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Prior Hypomethylating Agent Failure: A University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Protocol [NCT04905810]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-09Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Physical Conditioning and Decitabine for Newly Diagnosed AML Patients Age ≥ 60 Who Are Not Candidates for Standard Induction Chemotherapy [NCT02234037]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Retrospective, Observational, Monocentric Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of an Hypomethylating Agent in Combination With Venetoclax for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT04454580]15 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-08-01Recruiting
A Parallel Phase I/II Study of Low Dose Decitabine (5-Aza-Deoxycytidine) With Peginterferon Alfa-2b in Advanced Melanoma [NCT00791271]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-02Terminated
Decitabine+ Fludarabine+Busulfan Conditioning Regimen for Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Complete Remission Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT03530085]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-15Recruiting
A Phase II Study of the Combination of Decitabine, Venetoclax, and Ponatinib in Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myeloid Blast Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT04188405]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-17Recruiting
Pre-emptive Therapy With Low-dose Decitabine for Patients With Decreased Donor Chimerism After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT03663751]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-01Completed
Dual Growth Factor (rhTPO + G-CSF) and Chemotherapy Combination Regimen for Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Phase II Single-Arm Multicenter Study [NCT05258799]130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-21Recruiting
Low-Dose Decitabine Plus Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma With Extranodal (Esp. Central Nervous System) Involvement: A PhaseⅡClinical Trial [NCT05816746]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-15Recruiting
A Phase IB Rescue Study With Oral Decitabine (AStX727) and Durvalumab (MEDI4736) Combination Therapy in Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer Patients Who Have Progressed on Anti-PD-1, Anti-PD-L1, or Anti-CTLA-4 Monotherapy [NCT03019003]Phase 1/Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-20Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Venetoclax in Combination With 10-day Oral Decitabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04975919]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-29Active, not recruiting
"Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Combined With Decitabine Versus Conventional 7+3 Induction Chemotherapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Young Adults" [NCT05177731]Phase 3188 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Recruiting
A Phase I/IIa Study of TGFß Blockade in TCR-Engineered T-Cell Cancer Immunotherapy in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT02650986]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-14Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination With Decitabine and Hypofractionated Index Lesion Radiation in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Solid Tumors or Lymphoma [NCT03445858]Early Phase 121 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-12Active, not recruiting
Addition of Decitabine to Carboplatin-Paclitaxel in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Phase 2-3, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT02159820]Phase 2/Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-30Recruiting
A Phase 2, Open-Label Study of Intravenous Pevonedistat in Combination With Oral Decitabine and Cedazuridine in Adult Patients With Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT04985656]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor Decision to Terminate Trial)
Phase II Study on Venetoclax (VEN) Plus Decitabine (DEC) (VEN-DEC) for Elderly (≥60 <75years) Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Elegible for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (Allo-SCT) [NCT04476199]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-09Completed
Modified Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide Combined With DCAG as a Bridge Followed by Busulfan, Fludarabine and Melphalan Based Conditioning Regimen for Children With Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia [NCT03687463]6 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2015-04-10Enrolling by invitation
Outcomes of Patients After Allogenic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation With Decitabine-containing Conditioning Regimen and Acetylcysteine Treatment [NCT04945096]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-01Not yet recruiting
Phase 1 Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Decitabine 10-Day Regimen in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03844815]Phase 126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-18Recruiting
PD-1 Inhibitor Combined With Decitabine Followed by ASCT as Second-line Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT05137886]Phase 247 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-31Recruiting
Sequential Low-dose Decitabine Therapy With Novel CAR-T Carrying PD-1/CD28 Chimeric Switch Receptor in Relapsed or Refractory B-cell Lymphoma [NCT04850560]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-18Recruiting
Decitabine-primed Tandem Targeting CD19 and CD20 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Treatment in Relapsed and/or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients [NCT04697940]Phase 1/Phase 233 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-15Recruiting
A PhaseⅠ/Ⅱ Trial of Chidamide,Decitabine and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT05320640]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-30Recruiting
Phase I Study of Decitabine (Dacogen) and Selinexor (KPT-330) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02093403]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Decitabine Versus Patient's Choice With Physician's Advice of Either Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00260832]Phase 3485 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Phase I Study of Decitabine, Vorinostat, and Cytarabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01130506]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-17Completed
Phase I Open-Label Study of Decitabine in Combination With Midostaurin (PKC412) for Elderly (Age ≥ 60) Newly Diagnosed or Relapsed/Refractory Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01130662]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Pembrolizumab and Decitabine for Refractory or Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02996474]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-16Completed
An Open-label, Crossover, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy Bridging Study of Oral ASTX727 Versus IV Decitabine in Chinese Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT06091267]Phase 1/Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-16Recruiting
Single-arm, Open Label, Phase II Study of MBG453 (Sabatolimab) Added to FDA Approved Hypomethylating Agents of Investigator's Choice (IV/SC/Oral) for Patients With Intermediate, High or Very High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) as Per IPSS-R Criteria [NCT04878432]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-17Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Pacritinib in Combination With Low Dose Decitabine in Patients With Intermediate-High Risk Myelofibrosis or MPN/MDS Syndromes [NCT02564536]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of funding following full FDA clinical hold)
Phase 1B/2A Study of Weekly Decitabine and Venetoclax Treatment as Maintenance Therapy in High-Risk Myeloid Malignancy Patients Post Allograft Stem Cell Transplant [NCT06129734]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-04-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Adding Venetoclax to a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen and to Maintenance in Combination With a Hypomethylating Agent After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With High Risk AML, MDS, and MDS/MPN Overlap S [NCT03613532]Phase 178 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-24Recruiting
Multicenter Phase 1/2 Study of Combination Therapy w/ DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitor Decitabine & Poly ADP Ribose Polymerase Inhibitor Talazoparib for Untreated AML in Adults Unfit for Cytotoxic Chemotherapy or R/R AML [NCT02878785]Phase 1/Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Phase I Study of Decitabine and Haplo-identical Natural Killer Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02316964]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-21Completed
A Phase I Clinical Trial on Decitabine (5-aza-2'-Deoxycytidine) Administered by Hepatic Arterial Infusion in Patients With Unresectable Liver-predominant Metastases From Colorectal Cancer [NCT02316028]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Phase 1b Clinical Trial: Improving Outcomes With Androgen Pathway Inhibitors by Targeting DNA Methyltransferase Activity [NCT05037500]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-26Recruiting
Phase I Study of The Combination of Bortezomib and Sorafenib Followed by Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01861314]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-03Active, not recruiting
An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase II Trial Testing Single Agent Decitabine in TP53 Mutated Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03063203]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-14Terminated(stopped due to Futility)
A Phase 2, Prospective, Multi-center Intervention Trial in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Secondary to Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy Investigating a Treatment Combination Including Decitabine and Venetoclax [NCT04763928]Phase 2101 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-03Recruiting
A Phase 3, Open Label, Single Arm, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined With HAAG Regimen in Newly Diagnosed ETP-ALL/LBL, T/M-MPAL and ALL/LBL With Myeloid or Stem Cell Markers Patients [NCT04446130]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Recruiting
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of DLAAG Protocol in the Treatment of Refractory/Relapse of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Blast Excess: a Multicenter, Single-arm, Prospective Clinical Study [NCT03356080]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-07Recruiting
A PHASE 1 DOSE ESCALATION STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF INTRAVENOUS PF-06747143, ADMINISTERED AS SINGLE AGENT OR IN COMBINATION WITH STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA [NCT02954653]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-28Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated due to a change in sponsor prioritization.)
Combined Chemotherapy and PD-1 Antibody(SHR-1210) With or Without Low-dose Decitabine Priming for Relapsed or Refractory Primary Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma (rrPMBCL):Two Stage, Phase I/II Trail [NCT03346642]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-01Recruiting
Decitabine Plus mBU/CY for High Risk Acute Leukemia With Minimal Residual Disease Pre-HSCT [NCT03793517]Phase 2/Phase 355 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-01Recruiting
An Open-label Two Strata Study of Bisantrene in Combination With Cytarabine Arabinoside or Bisantrene in Combination With Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Extramedullary Disease [NCT05456269]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-07-29Withdrawn(stopped due to commercial reason)
A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-Group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of DACOGEN (Decitabine) for Injection and VIDAZA (Azacitidine) for Injection In Subjects With Intermediate or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT01011283]Phase 426 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Terminated(stopped due to The study was stopped due to insufficient enrollment.)
Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine and CAPOX (Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin) in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Enriched for Hypermethylation of CpG Promoter Islands [NCT01193517]Phase 1/Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
An Expanded Access Protocol to Administer Decitabine to Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT00760084]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
[NCT02662647]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 1b/2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of KRT-232 When Administered Alone and in Combination With Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) or Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT04113616]Phase 1/Phase 286 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-25Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Randomized, Four-Period, Three-Block, Pharmacokinetic Study of Three Formulations of Decitabine/Tetrahydrouridine (THU) Combination Modified Release Capsules in Healthy Adults Under Fasting and Fed Conditions [NCT04086238]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-08Completed
Clinical Study of Targeted T-cell Therapy in Solid Tumors [NCT04076137]Early Phase 110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-01Recruiting
A Master Protocol for Biomarker-Based Treatment of AML (The Beat AML Trial) [NCT03013998]Phase 1/Phase 22,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Recruiting
Phase I Evaluation of Adjuvant Oral Decitabine and Tetrahydrouridine With or Without Celecoxib in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Metastasectomy [NCT02839694]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-07Withdrawn
Randomized Open-label Phase 2 Study of Low Dose Dacogen® for Injection (Decitabine) in Patients With Low or Intermediate 1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00619099]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Addition of Chidamide to the Combination Treatment of Decitabine Plus Camrelizumab in Combination Treatment Resistant/Relapsed Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: an Open-label, Single Arm, Phase II Trial [NCT04233294]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-02Recruiting
Venetoclax in Combination With ASTX727, an All-ORal Therapy for Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia and Other MDS/MPN With Excess Blasts (VICTORY-MDS/MPN): a Randomized, Phase 2 Trial [NCT05600894]Phase 2132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-27Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Omacetaxine (OM) and Decitabine (DAC) in Older Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT02141477]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-06Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual-2 patients were registered Phase I and none in Phase II)
Leukemia SPORE Phase II Randomized Study of Decitabine Versus Decitabine and Carboplatin Versus Decitabine and Arsenic in Relapsed, Refractory, and Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT02190695]Phase 292 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-01Completed
A Phase 1 Study of DEC205mAb-NY ESO 1 Fusion Protein (CDX-1401) Given With Adjuvant Poly-ICLC in Conjunction With 5-Aza-2'Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) and Nivolumab in Patients With MDS or Low Blast Count AML [NCT03358719]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-27Completed
A Phase I/IIa Study of Decitabine in Combination With Genistein in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors and Leukemia [NCT02499861]Phase 1/Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Relapse AML: A Phase 1 Study of Decitabine and Vorinostat Followed by Fludarabine, Cytarabine and G-CSF (FLAG) in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed/Refractory AML [NCT03263936]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-11Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Nivolumab in Combination With ASTX727 in B-Cell Lymphoma (NHL or HL) With an Expansion Cohort in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) [NCT05272384]Phase 127 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-03Recruiting
"A Randomized Phase II/III Trial of Novel Therapeutics Versus Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), Age 60 or Older LEAP: Less-Intense AML Platform Trial" [NCT03092674]Phase 2/Phase 378 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-02Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Incidence and Prognostic Impact of Molecular and Genetic Abnormalities in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms [NCT02084563]Phase 2455 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
An Open-labelled, Parallel, Multiple Ascending Dose, Phase Ib Clinical Study of Decitabine and Paclitaxel Combination Therapy in Treating Patients With Metastatic and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer [NCT03282825]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-28Active, not recruiting
Multi-center Randomized Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Plus CHOP (D-CHOP) Versus CHOP in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma [NCT03553537]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-30Not yet recruiting
10-day Decitabine, Fludarabine and 2 Gray TBI as Conditioning Strategy for Poor and Very Poor Risk AML in CR1 [NCT02252107]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Phase I/Ib Study of Azacitidine or Decitabine With Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition in Myeloid Malignancies [NCT02129101]Phase 163 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Low Dose Decitabine + Modified BUCY Conditioning Regimen for High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allo-HSCT [NCT03256071]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-30Recruiting
"10-day Decitabine Versus Conventional Chemotherapy (3+7) Followed by Allografting in AML Patients ≥ 60 Years: a Randomized Phase III Study of the EORTC Leukemia Group, CELG, GIMEMA and German MDS Study Group" [NCT02172872]Phase 3606 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-28Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Phase I/II Trial of Ruxolitinib in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With Accelerated Phase Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) or Post-MPN AML [NCT02076191]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Decitabine With R-GDP on Refractory or Relapsed NHL Patients [NCT03535753]Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-01Recruiting
An Open Label, Randomized, Single Dose, Two Way Crossover, Bioavailability Study of a Combination Formulation of Decitabine/Tetrahydrouridine (2.5 mg/100 mg) Modified Release Capsules in Healthy, Fasting, Male Adults [NCT05816356]Phase 110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-24Recruiting
Proof-Of-Concept Study of Metabolically Optimized, Non-Cytotoxic 5-Azacitidine and Decitabine Epigenetic Therapy for Myeloid Malignancies [NCT04187703]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-16Recruiting
Phase II Study of Low Dose Decitabine (5-Aza-Deoxycytidine) With Interferon Alfa-2b in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00561912]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual.)
Phase II Prospective Randomized Control Trial of Cladribine and Low-Dose Cytarabine (LoDAC) Alternating With Decitabine vs. Hypomethylating Agents (HMA) Plus Venetoclax as Frontline Therapy for AML or High-Grade MDS in Patients Unfit for Intensive Inducti [NCT05766514]Phase 298 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-03-31Not yet recruiting
"Phase II Randomized Study of Low-Dose Decitabine (5-AZA-2'-Deoxycytidine) With or Without Valproic Acid in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia -SPORE" [NCT00414310]Phase 2153 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
The ABNL-MARRO 001 Study: A Phase 1/2 Study of Active Myeloid Target Compound Combinations in MDS/MPN Overlap Syndromes. [NCT04061421]Phase 1/Phase 2105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-10Recruiting
Maintenance Therapy With Decitabine After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT00986804]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of Decitabine and All-Trans Retinoic Acid (Tretinoin) for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00382200]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Novel Immuno-epigenetic Based Platform for Patients With Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTCL) and Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTCL): an International Phase Ib Study of Pembrolizumab Combined With Decitabine and/or Pralatrexate [NCT03240211]Phase 137 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-02Recruiting
A Proof-of-concept, Biomarker-driven, Phase-II Clinical Trial to Explore the Activity of Decitabine Repurposing Against Advanced, Refractory, KRAS-dependent Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC):The ORIENTATE Trial [NCT05360264]Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-15Recruiting
A Phase IIa, Open-label, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of BP1001 (a Liposomal Grb2 Antisense Oligonucleotide) in Combination With Venetoclax Plus Decitabine in Patients With AML Who Are Ineligible [NCT02781883]Phase 2108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Recruiting
A Phase Ib Open Label Study of Navitoclax in Combination With Venetoclax + Decitabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Previously Treated With Venetoclax [NCT05222984]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-29Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of ASTX727, Venetoclax, and Gilteritinib for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome With an Activating FLT3 Mutation [NCT05010122]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-08Recruiting
Phase 1b Study of Pembrolizumab, Decitabine +/- Venetoclax Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT03969446]Phase 154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-04Recruiting
Prospective Observation of the indUction Regimen for Acute Non-Promyelocytic Myeloid Leukemia in Elderly; Decitabine for Chemotherapy Unfit Korean Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients in Real Practice [NCT02698124]136 participants (Anticipated)Observational2016-03-31Not yet recruiting
Clinical Study of Low Dose of Decitabine Combined With Gemcitabine in First-line Treatment of Locally Advanced, Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT02685228]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase Ib Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of IBI188 in Combination With Demethylating Agents in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04485052]Phase 1/Phase 2222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-25Suspended(stopped due to Pause for changes in development strategies)
Treatment of Decitabine-primed Tandem Targeting CD19 and CD20 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Plus Epigenetic Agents in Aggressive Relapsed and/or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients With Huge Tumor Burden [NCT04553393]Phase 1/Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-09Recruiting
A Pilot Phase II Study of Decitabine, Arsenic Trioxide and Ascorbic Acid for Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT00621023]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Venetoclax Combined With Decitabine/Azacitidine and Aclarubicin Versus Venetoclax Combined With Decitabine/Azacitidine in Treatment-Naive Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05264883]Phase 3170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Recruiting
Phase I/II Evaluation of Oral Decitabine/Tetrahydrouridine as Epigenetic Priming for Pembrolizumab Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Inoperable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers, Esophageal Carcinomas, or Pleural Mesotheliomas [NCT03233724]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-11Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated due to drug supply issues.)
Inhibition of DNA Methylation by 1-hr Infusion of 5-aza-2'-Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) x 10 Days (M-F) With Escalating Doses of Sub-Q Pegylated (PEG) Interferon-alfa 2B (PEG-Intron): A Phase I Study With Molecular Correlates [NCT00886457]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
Clinical Evaluation of ASTX727 in Combination With Venetoclax All-Oral Therapy vs Standard of Care Cytarabine and Anthracycline Induction Chemotherapy for Younger FLT3WT Patients With ELN High- Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04817241]Phase 1/Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-10Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Study of Epigenetic Priming Using Decitabine With Front Line Induction Chemotherapy Compared With Immediate Induction Chemotherapy in Pediatric Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Subjects. [NCT00943553]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Terminated by Sponsor)
Phase II Study of Maintenance Therapy With Decitabine (NSC #127716) Following Standard Induction and Cytogenetic Risk-Adapted Intensification in Previously Untreated Patients With AML < 60 Years [NCT00416598]Phase 2546 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-15Completed
A Phase I Study of Lenalidomide in Combination With Decitabine for Patients With High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00828802]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Inhibition of DNA Methylation by 1-Hr Infusion of 5-aza-2'-Deoxycitidine (Decitabine) x 10 Days (M-F) With Escalating Doses of Sub-Q Pegylated (PEG) Interferon-alpha 2B (PEG-Intron): A Phase I Study With Molecular Correlates [NCT00701298]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated
Clinical Study of Efficacy and Safety of Novel Targeted Drugs Combined With R-ICE Regimen in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma [NCT05348213]Phase 276 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-16Recruiting
A Phase IIA Study of Subcutaneous 5-aza-2'- Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) in Patients With Thalassemia Intermedia [NCT00661726]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Cancer Research UK Randomised, Multicentre, Phase II Trial of the DNAhypomethylating Agent, 5-Aza-2'-Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) Given Intravenously in Combination With Carboplatin, Versus Carboplatin Alone Given 4 Weekly in Patients With Progressive, Ad [NCT00748527]Phase 2134 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-07-31Terminated(stopped due to "The study was withdrawn due to certain adverse events [hypersensitivity].")
International Proof of Concept Therapeutic Stratification Trial of Molecular Anomalies in Relapsed or Refractory HEMatological Malignancies in Children, Subprotocol A: Decitabine / Venetoclax and Navitoclax in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractor [NCT05740449]Phase 1/Phase 226 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-01Not yet recruiting
Clinical Study of Descitabine Enhanced Infusion of Autologous DC-CIK Cells as a Post-remission Treatment for Malignant Tumors [NCT04292769]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-21Recruiting
Low Dose Decitabine for Poor Graft Function Post Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT05907499]Phase 376 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-01Not yet recruiting
Phase Ib/II: Epigenetic Modification of Chemosensitivity and Apoptosis in Metastatic Melanoma: Treatment of a Resistant Disease Using Decitabine, Temozolomide and Panobinostat [NCT00925132]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Change in the number of approved drugs for metastatic melanoma)
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 1-2 Study of ASTX727 Low Dose (ASTX727 LD) Extended Schedule in Subjects With Lower Risk (IPSS Low or Intermediate-1) Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT03502668]Phase 1/Phase 2160 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-27Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of the Impact of Clinicogenetic Risk-Stratified Management on Outcomes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients [NCT03226418]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-07Active, not recruiting
Phase 1b, Multi-arm, Open-label Study of PDR001 and/or MBG453 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT03066648]Phase 1241 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-06Completed
A Randomized Study of Decitabine Alternating With Clofarabine Versus Decitabine Until Failure in Patients With Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT00903760]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Phase I Clinical Trial of Dendritic Cell/AML Fusion Cell Vaccine Alone and in Conjunction With Decitabine Following Allogeneic Transplantation in AML Patients [NCT03679650]Phase 145 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-11Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of LBH589 Plus Decitabine for Patients Age ≥ 60 Years With High Risk MDS or AML [NCT00691938]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Phase II, Multicenter Study of Decitabine (5-aza-2'Deoxycytidine) in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Blast Phase Refractory to Imatinib Mesylate (STI 571) [NCT00042003]Phase 240 participants Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Pre-operative Decitabine in Colon Cancer: a Proof of Principle Study [NCT01882660]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Inclusion of patients was slow. Could not reach the target within the studyperiod.)
Phase II Study of Low-Dose Intravenous Decitabine in Patients Aged > 60 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Not Eligible for Standard Induction Chemotherapy [NCT00866073]Phase 2238 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Phase 1 Study of NKX101, an Activating Chimeric Receptor Natural Killer Cell Therapy, in Subjects With Hematological Malignancies or Dysplasias [NCT04623944]Phase 190 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-21Recruiting
A Proof of Concept Study of Non-DNA Damaging DNMT1 Depletion Therapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01165996]Phase 1/Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01303796]Phase 3482 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-01Completed
Oral Decitabine-Based Maintenance Therapy in Patients With AML in Remission [NCT05010772]Phase 1125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-25Recruiting
Phase II Study Assessing Safety and Clinical Activity of the Combination of ASTX727 With Dasatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) [NCT05007873]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-21Recruiting
A Phase 3, Open Label, Single Arm, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined With HAAG Regimen in Elderly Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients. [NCT04083911]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-01Recruiting
A Phase IB/II Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of ASTX727 and FT-2102 in IDH1-Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04013880]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-27Withdrawn(stopped due to Loss of funding)
A Phase I Study Of Decitabine (DAC) (IND # 50733) In Children With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Leukemia [NCT00042796]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
A Phase I/II Clinical Study of JNJ-30979754 (Decitabine) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT00796003]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Decitabine Treatment in HPV-Induced Anogenital and Head and Neck Cancer Patients After Radiotherapy or as Novel Late Salvage (DERANO) [NCT04252248]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-11Terminated(stopped due to Organizational reasons)
Clofarabine Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine Induction Followed by Consolidation of Clofarabine Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine Alternating With Decitabine in Frontline Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT00778375]Phase 2122 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
p53/p16-Independent Epigenetic Therapy With Oral Decitabine/Tetrahydrouridine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer That Has Progressed Through One or More Lines of Therapy [NCT02847000]Early Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-20Completed
Prospective, Open, Multi-center, Double Arm Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Ultra Low Dose of Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT02779569]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Recruiting
A Phase II Multi-center Study of 5-AZA-2'-Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) Single Agent in Taiwanese Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT00744757]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Phase 1-2, Open-Label Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Preliminary Activity of Tolinapant in Combination With Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine and Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine Alone in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral [NCT05403450]Phase 1/Phase 2132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-23Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Venetoclax in Combination With ASTX727 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia, and Newly Diagnosed Elderly Patients With AML Who Are Not Candidates for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT04746235]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-22Recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of Venetoclax in Combination With ASTX727 (Cedazuridine/Decitabine) in Treatment-Naïve High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) [NCT04655755]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-19Recruiting
Decitabine+Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide vs Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen for Myeloid Tumors Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT04098653]Phase 2/Phase 3196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-30Recruiting
A Pilot/Phase 1b Study of Glasdegib-Based Treatment Combinations in Adult Patients With Relapsed AML Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT04655391]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-25Withdrawn(stopped due to Drug availability)
A Low Dose Decitabine Combined With Tirelizumab Prospective Phase II Clinical Study Comparing Tirelizumab in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Did Not Progress With First-line Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy [NCT05638984]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Not yet recruiting
Decitabine Plus Carboplatin in the Treatment of Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT03295552]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-15Terminated(stopped due to Slow enrollment.)
Prospective Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial of Low-dose Decitabine (DAC) Administered Alone or in Combination With the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Valproic Acid (VPA) and All-trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA) in Patients > 60 Years With Acute Myeloid Leu [NCT00867672]Phase 2204 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Decitabine Administered Daily for 5 Days Every 4 Weeks to Adults With Advanced-Stage Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00260065]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Decitabine + R-CHOP in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT02951728]Phase 1/Phase 258 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Epigenetic Priming Using Decitabine With Induction Chemotherapy in Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) [NCT00538876]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined With HAAG Regimen in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Younger Than 60 Years [NCT04087967]Phase 3162 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-01Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Decitabine For the Front-line Treatment of Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00358644]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Phase I Trial of SAHA (NSC 701852) and Decitabine (IND 50733, NSC 127716) in Patients With Relapsed, Refractory or Poor Prognosis Leukemia [NCT00357708]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Phase 1/2 Study Epigenetic Modification of BRAF-mutated Metastatic Melanoma: Treatment of a Resistant Disease Using Decitabine Combined With Vemurafenib Plus Cobimetinib [NCT01876641]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Loss of funding)
A Phase 1b/2 Study of IMGN632 as Monotherapy or Combination With Venetoclax and/or Azacitidine for Participants With CD123-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04086264]Phase 1/Phase 2292 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-06Recruiting
A Phase 1b, Open-label, Parallel Group, Multiple-dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Decitabine and Cedazuridine (ASTX727) in Cancer Patients With Severe Renal Impairment and Cancer Patients With Normal Renal Func [NCT04953897]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-15Recruiting
Phase III Randomized Trial of Clofarabine as Induction and Post-Remission Therapy vs. Standard Daunorubicin &Amp; Cytarabine Induction and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Post-Remission Therapy, Followed by Decitabine Maintenance vs. Observation in Newly-Dia [NCT02085408]Phase 3727 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-04Active, not recruiting
Phase 1/2 Study of Concurrent Decitabine in Combination With G-CSF, Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Mitoxantrone (G-CLAM) in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT02921061]Phase 1/Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-17Completed
A Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Collaborative Phase Ⅳ Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Decitabine in Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT02013102]Phase 4240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-03-31Recruiting
Phase II Evaluation of Decitabine/Cedazuridine (INQOVI), an Oral DNA Demethylating Agent in Subjects With BAP1 Cancer Predisposition Syndrome and Subclinical, Early-Stage Mesothelioma [NCT05960773]Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-03Not yet recruiting
Ruxolitinib and Decitabine Intensified Conditioning Regimen for Patients With High Risk Hematological Malignancies Underwenting Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT04582604]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of Decitabine as a Sensitizer to Carboplatin in Platinum Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer [NCT00477386]Phase 1/Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Phase I Clinical Trial of Vorinostat in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT00479232]Phase 171 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Phase II, Single Arm Study of Tislelizumab Combined With DNA Demethylation Agent +/- CAG Regimen in the Treatment of Patients With High-risk AML or AML Patients Older Than 60 Years of Age Who Are Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT04541277]Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Recruiting
A Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine as Epigenetic Priming With Induction Chemotherapy in Pediatric Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Subjects [NCT01177540]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-03Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early due to enrollment difficulties and the futility of observing differences in remission rate between treatment arms.)
A Multi-center Prospective Single Arm Clinical Study of Prolonged Ultra Low-dose Decitabine Combined With Venetoclax (Bcl-2 Inhibitor) as First Line Treatment for Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT06046313]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-27Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Clinical Activity of Orally Administered FHD-286, as Monotherapy or Combination Therapy, in Subjects With Advanced Hemato [NCT04891757]Phase 1144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-14Recruiting
A Phase 2 Trial Investigating Decitabine in Combination With a JAK-Inhibitor as a Bridge to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Accelerated/Blast Phase Myeloproliferative Neoplasms [NCT04282187]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-24Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Epigenetic Priming in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03164057]Phase 2206 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-15Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation With Expansion Study of SX-682 Alone and in Combination With Oral or Intravenous Decitabine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT04245397]Phase 1151 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-12Recruiting
Phase II Multicenter Open-Label Single-Arm Study of Decitabine Combined With Oxaliplatin in Patients With Relapsed/Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT04049344]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-15Recruiting
A Trial for Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT02272478]Phase 2/Phase 31,600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-30Recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Multicenter Study to Assess the Tolerability and Efficacy of the Addition of Midostaurin to 10-day Decitabine Treatment in Unfit Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High Risk Myelodysplasia Patients [NCT04097470]Phase 2140 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-05Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of Decitabine in Combination With Escalating Doses of Rapamycin in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00861874]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Intravenous Decitabine in Combination With Oral Bexarotene in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT01001143]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of (Early) Combination Salvage Therapy With Venetoclax and in Intensified Decitabine in Relapsed/Refractory AML [NCT06156579]Phase 227 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-04Recruiting
Decitabine and HQP1351-based Chemotherapy Regimen for the Treatment Advanced Chronic Myeloid Leukemia [NCT05376852]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Recruiting
D-CTAG in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Elderly Patients [NCT04168138]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-01Recruiting
A Phase Ib, Multicenter, Open-label Dose Escalation and Expansion Platform Study of Select Combinations in Adult Patients With Myelofibrosis [NCT04283526]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to This study was cancelled before enrolling any patients for business related reasons.)
p53/p16-Independent Epigenetic Therapy With Oral Decitabine/Tetrahydrouridine for Refractory/Relapsed Lymphoid Malignancies [NCT02846935]Early Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-25Completed
Phase I Study of Decitabine Mediated Induction of Tumor Antigen and Tumor Suppressor Gene Expression in Lung Cancer Patients [NCT00019825]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-10-31Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Study of PCM-075 (Onvansertib) in Combination With Either Low-Dose Cytarabine or Decitabine in Subjects With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT03303339]Phase 1/Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-17Completed
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Decitabine Combined With TQB2450 Injection (PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibody) or Decitabine + Anlotinib Combined With TQB2450 Injection in the Treatment of PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody-resistant Digestive System Tumor [NCT04611711]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase Ib Study of Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine as Maintenance Therapy Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Myeloid Neoplasms [NCT04980404]Phase 122 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-17Recruiting
A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study for Dacogen Long-Term Treatment in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01400633]156 participants (Actual)Observational2010-12-31Completed
Phase 2/3 Study of Efficacy Study of CHG Regimen vs Decitabine to Treat Higher-risk MDS [NCT01417767]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-09-30Not yet recruiting
Phase I Study of Prolonged Low Dose Decitabine (5-Aza-Deoxycytidine, NSC #127716) in Patients With Biopsiable Advanced Cancers Refractory to Standard Therapy [NCT00089089]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Terminated
Phase I Study of Gene Induction Mediated by Sequential Decitabine/Depsipeptide Infusion With or Without Concurrent Celecoxib in Subjects With Pulmonary and Pleural Malignancies [NCT00037817]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-17Completed
Decitabine and Arsenic Trioxide(ATO) in the Treatment of Myelodysplasic Syndrome [NCT03377725]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-20Withdrawn(stopped due to No patient was involved.)
A Phase II, Multicenter Study of Decitabine (5-Aza-2'Deoxycytidine) in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Accelerated Phase Refractory to Imatinib Mesylate (STI 571) [NCT00041990]Phase 240 participants Interventional2002-07-31Completed
Phase I/II Trial of the Combination of Decitabine and Temozolomide in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00715793]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Decitabine for Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT01806116]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Active, not recruiting
Dual Growth Factor (rhTPO + G-CSF) and Chemotherapy Combination Regimen in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05382390]Phase 3130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-21Recruiting
Phase I Study of Decitabine (Dacogen) and Bortezomib (Velcade) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00703300]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Multicentre Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Decitabine Tetrahydrouridine (NDec) in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease [NCT05405114]Phase 284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-07Recruiting
Phase II Evaluation of Nivolumab, an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Alone or in Combination With Oral Decitabine/Tetrahydrouridine as Second Line Therapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT02664181]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-06Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Ruxolitinib Plus Decitabine in Patients With Post Myeloproliferative Neoplasm - Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02257138]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-12Completed
Phase 1/2 Study of Decitabine Combined With Modified CAG Followed by HLA Haploidentical T Cell Infusion in Treating Elderly Patients With Intermediate-high Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome(MDS) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia(AML) [NCT01690507]Phase 1/Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Metabolically Optimized, Non-cytotoxic Low Dose Weekly Decitabine/Venetoclax in MDS and AML [NCT05184842]Phase 233 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-23Recruiting
Efficacy of Decitabine in Clearance of MRD [NCT03021395]Phase 1/Phase 2300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-08Suspended(stopped due to The previous data needs to be analyzed.)
Decitabine for COVID-19 Pneumonia-ARDS Treatment: DART Trial [NCT04482621]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-14Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of Decitabine and Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Transplantation for Treatment of Relapse Post Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation [NCT00002832]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Decitabine and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT00968071]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Combined PD1 Inhibitor and Decitabine in Elderly Patients With Relapse and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia : An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Study. [NCT04353479]Phase 229 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-25Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 2 Trial of Chidamide+Decitabine+Camrelizumab Versus Decitabine+Camrelizumab in Anti-PD-1 Antibody Resistant Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. [NCT04514081]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-01Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine in Combination With Magrolimab for Previously Untreated Subjects With Intermediate- to Very High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT05835011]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-07-14Terminated(stopped due to Termination due to discontinuation of magrolimab development in MDS.)
A Pilot Open Label Phase I Trial to Evaluate the Safety and the Tolerability of a Combination of Two HIV-1 Inducers in HIV+ Sub-type B Patients Under cART With Undetectable Viral Load [NCT05230368]Phase 115 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-14Recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of Pre-emptive Therapy With DEC-C to Improve Outcomes in MDS Patients With Measurable Residual Disease Post Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant [NCT04742634]Phase 1/Phase 2126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-12Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study of ASTX727 (Cedazuridine and Decitabine Fixed-Dose Combination) Versus IV Decitabine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML), and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (A [NCT03306264]Phase 3200 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-15Completed
Randomized Phase II Study on Decitabine Plus Carboplatin Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent, Platinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer. [NCT03467178]Phase 2119 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-30Recruiting
Phase I Clinical Study of TQB2618 Injection in Combination With Demethylation Drugs in Patients With Recurrent/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT05426798]Phase 173 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-29Recruiting
A Phase 1b, Open-label, Parallel Group, Multiple-dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Decitabine and Cedazuridine (ASTX727) in Cancer Patients With Moderate and Severe Hepatic Impairment [NCT04953910]Phase 127 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-23Recruiting
A Phase II Simon Two-Stage Study of the Addition of Pracinostat to a Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Who Have Failed to Respond or Maintain a Response to the HMA Alone [NCT01993641]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Randomized Study of Decitabine Versus Observation or Continued Standard Chemotherapy as Maintenance Therapy for Adults With Unfavorable Risk AML in First Complete Remission (CR) or Adults With Relapsed AML in Second or Greater CR [NCT00398983]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Phase I Study of DEC205mAb-NY-ESO-1 Fusion Protein (CDX-1401) Given With Adjuvant PoIylCLC in Conjunction With 5-Aza-2'Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) in Patients With MDS or Low Blast Count AML [NCT01834248]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-30Completed
Phase II Randomized Study of Lower Doses of Decitabine (DAC; 20 mg/m2 IV Daily for 3 Days Every Month) Versus Azacitidine (AZA; 75 mg/m2 SC/IV Daily for 3 Days Every Month) in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Patients With Low and Intermediate-1 Risk Diseas [NCT01720225]Phase 2113 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-06Completed
A Phase I Study of Decitabine in Combination With Valproic Acid in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00109824]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of Vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid; SAHA) in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors, Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, or Chronic Myel [NCT00275080]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Phase I/Ib Study of BP1002 (a Liposomal Bcl-2 Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotide) in Patients With Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT05190471]Phase 148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-16Recruiting
Phase II Study of Cladribine Plus Low Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) Induction Followed By Consolidation With Cladribine Plus LDAC Alternating With Decitabine in Patients With Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT01515527]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-02-07Recruiting
Combination of Sintilimab and Decitabine for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory or Advanced NK/T-cell Lymphoma : a Single Arm,Open-lable,Phase II Study [NCT04279379]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-01Recruiting
Phase Ib/II Study of Enzalutamide With Decitabine, a DNA Hypomethylating Agent, in Patients With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) [NCT03709550]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-15Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of funding)
A Phase I Study of 5-AZA-2'-Deoxycytidine and Depsipeptide in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, or Myeloproliferative Disease [NCT00114257]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
[NCT01758367]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-12-31Recruiting
Phase I Study of Palbociclib Alone and in Combination in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Leukemias [NCT03132454]Phase 154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-25Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Filgrastim-sndz,Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin and Idarubicin in Newly Diagnosed Core Binding Factor Associated Acute Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00801489]Phase 2270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-04-04Recruiting
Thalassemia Clinical Research Network (TCRN) [NCT00000623]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2000-07-31Completed
Phase II Study of Decitabine and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT00882102]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Prophylaxis With Decitabine Combined With Filgrastim for Children and Young Adults With AML, MDS and Related Myeloid Malignancies [NCT05796570]Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-19Recruiting
A Phase I Pharmacokinetic Trial of Decitabine (Dacogen) Administered as a 3-hour Infusion to Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01378416]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Phase I Trial Combining Decitabine and Vaccine Therapy for Patients With Relapsed Neuroblastoma and Sarcoma. [NCT01241162]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Clinical Study of Decitabine Combined With NK Cell Infusion in the Treatment of Malignant Tumors [NCT05143125]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-05Recruiting
An Open-label, Multicenter, phase2/3 Study of Camrelizumab Plus Decitabine in Anti-PD-1 Treatment-naive Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT04510610]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-01Recruiting
A Phase II, Multicenter Study of Decitabine (5-aza-2'Deoxycytidine) in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Chronic Phase Refractory to Imatinib Mesylate (STI 571) [NCT00042016]Phase 240 participants Interventional2002-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase III Trial of Decitabine (5-aza-2'Deoxycytidine) Versus Supportive Care in Adults With Advanced-stage Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT00043381]Phase 3160 participants Interventional2001-04-30Completed
Phase I Study of 5-Aza-2'-Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) as a Biologic Modifier of Retinoid Responsive Genes in Patients With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (De-novo, Relapsed or Secondary) [NCT00049582]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Terminated
Phase I/II Study of 5-aza-2'-Deoxycytidine and Valproic Acid in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00075010]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-23Completed
A Phase I Study of Decitabine (NSC# 127716, IND# 50733) in Combination With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00075634]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Decitabine in Combination With Valproic Acid in Patients With Selected Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00079378]Phase 184 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Phase I Study Of The Toxicities, Biologic And Clinical Effects Of Daily 5 Aza 2'Deoxycytidine (DAC), NSC 127716 (IND 50733) For Four Weeks In Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00030615]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Parallel-arm, Phase 2 Clinical Trial of the Combination of Glasdegib (Pf-04449913) With Two Standard Decitabine Regimens for Older Patients With Poor-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Unfit for or Refuse Intensive Chemotherapy (GLAD-AML) [NCT04051996]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-06Terminated(stopped due to Unable to accrue patients following COVID-19 study pause.)
A Phase I Open Label Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Adoptive Transfer of NY-ESO-1 TCR Engineered Autologous T Cells in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With Recurrent or Treatment Refractory Ovarian Cancer [NCT03017131]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-08Active, not recruiting
Intravenous Low-Dose Decitabine Versus Supportive Care in Elderly Patients With Primary Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) (>10% Blasts or High-Risk Cytogenetics), Secondary MDS or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Who Are Not Eligible for Intensive Ther [NCT00043134]Phase 3220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-05-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Imatinib Mesylate (Gleevec, STI-571) (NSC#716051) and Decitabine (5-AZA-2'-Deoxycitidine) (NSC#127716), in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Accelerated and Blastic Phases [NCT00054431]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Decitabine in Combination With Valproic Acid in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00084981]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Combination of Decitabine and ATO to Treat AML/MDS Expressing a Classified Type of Mutant p53 [NCT03855371]Phase 15 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-10Recruiting
A Phase 1b Study: Treatment of Refractory Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Advanced Soft Tissue or Bone Sarcomas Using Decitabine Combined With Gemcitabine [NCT02959164]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-05Completed
Phase II Study of Decitabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00492401]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Vosaroxin and Decitabine in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01893320]Phase 1/Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-18Completed
Phase 1/2 Study of Decitabine Alone and/or in Combination With Chemotherapy and/or Cytokine Induced Killer Cell Transfusion in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Solid Tumors and B Cell Lymphomas [NCT01799083]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-12-31Recruiting
Phase II Study of Pacritinib for Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT02469415]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Terminated(stopped due to FDA Clinical Hold)
Phase II Study of Eltrombopag in Combination With Decitabine in Subjects With Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT02010645]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Terminated(stopped due to PI Request)
Phase I/II Study of Decitabine (DAC) Followed by Clofarabine, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine (CIA) in Acute Leukemia [NCT01794702]Phase 1/Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-20Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Decitabine-Based Induction Strategies for Patients >/= 60 Years Old With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT01420926]Phase 2165 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-16Completed
Decitabine and Umbilical Cord Blood for Poor Graft Function Post Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT05669079]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of E7727, an Oral Cytidine Deaminase Inhibitor (CDAi) With Oral Decitabine in Subjects With Solid Tumors [NCT03875287]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-17Recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of Subcutaneous Decitabine Maximizing Genomic Demethylation in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome. [NCT00282399]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Terminated
Phase 1 Study of Oral Decitabine and Tetrahydrouridine (THU) in Patients With High Risk Sickle Cell Disease [NCT01685515]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
A Phase Ib/II Multicenter Open-label Study of BGB324 as a Single Agent and in Combination With Cytarabine or Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or as a Single Agent in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT02488408]Phase 1/Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Active, not recruiting
Anti-PD-1 Antibody Alone or in Combination With Low-dose Decitabine and/or Chemotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Malignancies: an Open-label Phase I/II Trial [NCT02961101]Phase 1/Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Recruiting
Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. [NCT06073730]Phase 3154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
Phase 2 Study of Decitabine and Cedazuridine in Combination With Venetoclax for AML Relapse After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT05799079]Phase 251 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Venetoclax in Combination With 10-Day Decitabine in Newly Diagnosed Elderly or Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Relapsed High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm [NCT03404193]Phase 2440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-18Recruiting
Phase II Randomized Study of Three Different Schedules of Low-Dose Decitabine (5-AZA-2'-Deoxycytidine) in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT00067808]Phase 2128 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
An Single-arm Open-label Phase II Study of Decitabine Plus Penpulimab as Second-line Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With PD-1 Blockade [NCT05265962]Phase 285 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Not yet recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study of Epigenetic Priming Using Decitabine With Induction Chemotherapy in Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) [NCT01627041]Phase 2178 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-16Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/IIa Dose-Escalation Study of the Decitabine-Genistein Drug Combination in Advanced Solid Tumors and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Subjects [NCT01628471]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
A Single-Arm, Open-Label Pharmacokinetic, Safety, and Efficacy Study of ASTX727 in Combination With Venetoclax in Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04657081]Phase 1/Phase 2188 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-09Recruiting
The Clinical Research About the Therapeutic Effect and Safety of 10 Days Regimen With Single-agent of Decitabine for Elderly AML Patients [NCT01633099]Phase 346 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Trial Examining Epigenetic Priming With Decitabine Followed by Idarubicin and Cytarabine for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AML. [NCT01607645]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early because there were other competing protocols.)
A Phase 1b Study of ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Combination With Azacitidine or Decitabine in Treatment-Naive Subjects With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Who Are Greater Than or Equal to 60 Years of Age and Who Are Not Eligible for Standard Induction Therapy [NCT02203773]Phase 1212 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-06Terminated(stopped due to Strategic considerations)
An Open-label, Multicenter, Roll-over Study for Patients Who Have Completed a Prior Novartis-sponsored Sabatolimab (MBG453) Study and Are Judged by the Investigator to Benefit From Continued Treatment With Sabatolimab. [NCT05201066]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-13Recruiting
A Pilot/Safety Study of sEphB4-HSA in Combination With a Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and AML Previously Treated With a Hypomethylating Agent [NCT03146871]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-20Terminated(stopped due to Lack of funding)
A Phase I Study of Oral Decitabine and Cedazuridine (ASTX727) In Combination With Defactinib (VS-6063) as Therapy of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Low-blast Acute Myeloid Leukaemia [NCT05636514]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-14Recruiting
Phase I Study of AR-42 and Decitabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01798901]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-17Completed
[NCT01809392]Phase 2/Phase 315 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Trial of Fedratinib in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Accelerated and Blast Phase [NCT05524857]Phase 113 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-28Recruiting
The Use of Decitabine as Induction Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Complex and/or Monosomal Karyotype [NCT03080766]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-01Recruiting
An Extended Phase 2 Study of Decitabine in Subjects With High Risk Sickle Cell Disease [NCT01375608]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Two Schedules of Decitabine for Frontline Therapy of Older or Unfit Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT01786343]Phase 274 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-05Completed
G-CSF+DAC+BUCY vs. G-CSF+DAC+BF Conditioning Regimen for Patients With Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Evolving From MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT05449899]Phase 2/Phase 3232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-31Recruiting
Genomic Predictors of Decitabine Response in AML/MDS [NCT01687400]Phase 2114 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-12Completed
A PHASE 1B/2 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PF-04449913, AN ORAL HEDGEHOG INHIBITOR, IN COMBINATION WITH INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY, LOW DOSE ARA-C OR DECITABINE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA OR HIGH-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME [NCT01546038]Phase 2255 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-27Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Dose, Four-Way Crossover, Bioavailability Study of Three Formulations of Decitabine/Tetrahydrouridine (THU) Combination Modified Release Capsules (5 mg/250 mg) in Healthy and Fasting Adults [NCT03828084]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-03Completed
A Phase I Study of Entrectinib in Combination With ASTX727 (35 mg Decitabine and 100 mg Cedazuridine) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory TP53 Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT05396859]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-28Recruiting
Phase I-II Study of Low-Dose Azacitidine (Vidaza) in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Minimal Residual Disease While Receiving Therapy With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (VZ-CML-PI-0236) [NCT01460498]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-08Completed
PRO#0118: A Phase I Study of Decitabin in Combination With Fludarabin and Busulfan as a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen for the Treatment of Myeloid Malignancies [NCT01455506]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
A Phase I Study of the Biologic and Clinical Effects of 5-AZA-2'Deoxycytidine (DAC) in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00002980]Phase 10 participants Interventional1997-05-31Completed
A Phase 3b, Single-Arm, Multicenter Open-Label Study of Venetoclax in Combination With Azacitidine or Decitabine in an Outpatient Setting in AML Patients Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT03941964]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-15Completed
A Phase I/Pilot II Trial Combining Decitabine and Vaccine Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Pediatric High Grade Gliomas, Medulloblastomas, and Central Nervous System Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors (CNS PNETs) [NCT02332889]Phase 1/Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Transition to a different immunotherapy strategy in the future at our institution)
A Randomized, Phase 2 Study of Biomarker Guided Treatment in DLBCL [NCT04025593]Phase 2128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-17Recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of BMS-986253 in Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT05148234]Phase 1/Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-29Active, not recruiting
Salsalate + Venetoclax/Decitabine for Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia or Advanced Myelodysplasia/Myeloproliferative Disease [NCT04146038]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-26Completed
Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine (DEC-C) in Combination With Nivolumab as a Strategy to Enhance the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Unresectable or Metastatic Mucosal Melanoma [NCT05089370]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-20Recruiting
A Phase 1 Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Absolute Bioavailability of a Single Oral Dose Administration of Decitabine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT00941109]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Single-center Prospective Clinical Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Ultra Small Dose Decitabine for the Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients With Transfusion Dependent [NCT03045510]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-01Recruiting
Phase II Study of Decitabine in Patients With Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Cancer or Follicular Thyroid Cancer Unresponsive to Radioiodine [NCT00085293]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, and Cytarabine (MEC) Following Epigenetic Priming With Decitabine in Adults With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Phase 1/2 Study [NCT01729845]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-20Completed
Phase II Study of Low-Dose Decitabine (5-AZA-2'-Deoxycytidine) in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Post Azacytidine (AZA) Failure [NCT00113321]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Low Accrual)
Induction Therapy With Pacritinib Combined With Decitabine or Cytarabine in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02532010]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-15Terminated(stopped due to The study was put on clinical hold by the sponsor since Feb 9th 2016, and was later decided not to re-open due to financial constraints.)
A Phase 1b/2, Open-label Clinical Study to Determine Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Alvocidib When Administered in Sequence After Decitabine or Azacitidine in Patients With MDS [NCT03593915]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-29Terminated(stopped due to The sponsor decided not to continue the study based on the overall company strategy in AML.)
An Open-label, Phase I/II Trial to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose and Investigate Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of BI 836858 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02632721]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-16Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Entospletinib (GS-9973) Monotherapy and in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02343939]Phase 1/Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-01Terminated
A Therapeutic Trial of Decitabine and Vorinostat in Combination With Chemotherapy (Vincristine, Prednisone, Doxorubicin and PEG-Asparaginase) for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LL) [NCT00882206]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Initial Cytoreductive Therapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (the ICT-HCT Study) [NCT01812252]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-02Completed
Decitabine+Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide vs Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen for TP53+ Myeloid Tumors Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT04123392]Phase 2/Phase 3196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-31Recruiting
Phase I Study of Low Dose 5-Aza-2'-Deoxycytidine Administered Daily for 5 Days Every Other Week for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00349596]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor+Decitabine+Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide vs Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen for Patients With RAEB-1, RAEB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02744742]Phase 2/Phase 3202 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-18Completed
A Randomized Phase 2/3 Study of DACOGEN® (Decitabine) Plus Talacotuzumab (JNJ-56022473; Anti CD123) Versus DACOGEN (Decitabine) Alone in Patients With AML Who Are Not Candidates for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT02472145]Phase 2/Phase 3326 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-04Completed
Phase II Study With Decitabine (5-aza-2'-Deoxycytidine, DAC) in Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00003361]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional1998-04-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Decitabine in Combination With Sequential Rapamycin or Ribavirin in High Risk AML Patients [NCT02109744]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose Decitabine in Refractory Aplastic Anemia (LODACA): a Phase 2, Single-arm, Open-label Study [NCT04854889]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-22Terminated(stopped due to Not achieve the desired effect)
A Phase II Study of Combination Midostaurin and Decitabine (MIDDAC) in Elderly Patients Newly Diagnosed With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and FLT3 Mutation [NCT02634827]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-30Terminated
A Prospective Study of Patients With Isolated Thrombocytopenia Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02487563]Phase 397 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of Decitabine and Cytarabine for Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed AML [NCT01829503]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Phase II Randomized Study of Lower Doses of Decitabine (DAC; 20 mg/m2 IV Daily for 3 Days Every Month) Versus Azacitidine (AZA; 75 mg/m2 SC/IV Daily for 3 Days Every Month) Versus Azacitidine (AZA; 75 mg/m2 SC/IV Daily for 5 Days Every Month) in MDS Patie [NCT02269280]Phase 2268 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-13Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Proof-of-Concept Study of Talazoparib-Based Therapy for Cohesin-Mutated AML and MDS With Excess Blasts [NCT03974217]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-01Recruiting
Phase 3 Randomized Trial of DFP-10917 vs Non-Intensive Reinduction (LoDAC, Azacitidine, Decitabine, Venetoclax Combination Regimens) or Intensive Reinduction (High & Intermediate Dose Cytarabine Regimens) for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Patients in Second, [NCT03926624]Phase 3450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-22Recruiting
G-CSF+DAC+BUCY vs. G-CSF+DAC+BF Conditioning Regimen for Patients With High-risk MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT05453552]Phase 2/Phase 3242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-01Recruiting
Chidamide in Combination With Decitabine in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Relapsed After Chimeric Antigen Receptor : An Open-label Phase I/II Trial [NCT04337606]Phase 1/Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-04Recruiting
G-CSF+DAC+BUCY vs. G-CSF+DAC+BF Conditioning Regimen for Patients With RAEB-1, RAEB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT04713956]Phase 2/Phase 3242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-15Recruiting
Phase I/II Trial of Tamoxifen Following Epigenetic Regeneration of Estrogen Receptor Using Decitabine and LBH 589 in Patients With Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT01194908]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
An Open-Label, Phase I/II Study of Two Different Schedules of Dasatinib (Sprycel) and Decitabine (Dacogen) Used in Combination for Patients With Accelerated or Blastic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Protocol CA180357) [NCT01498445]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-12Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated early during the phase II portion of the study due to slow enrollment.)
Proof-of-concept Study of Nicotinamide and Oral Tetrahydrouridine (THU) and Decitabine to Treat High Risk Sickle Cell Disease [NCT04055818]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-24Recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Study of Alvocidib in Combination With Decitabine and Venetoclax in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AML or as Frontline Therapy in Unfit Patients With AML [NCT04493099]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to The original sponsor was acquired by a new company and has elected to end funding for all Investigator Sponsored Trials (ISTs))
A Phase I/II Trial of the MUC1 Inhibitor, GO-203-2C in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02204085]Phase 1/Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase1-2 Pharmacokinetic Guided Dose-Escalation and Dose-Confirmation Study of ASTX727, a Combination of the Oral Cytidine Deaminase Inhibitor (CDAi) E7727 With Oral Decitabine in Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT02103478]Phase 1/Phase 2130 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-28Completed
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation as Initial Salvage Therapy for Patients With Primary Induction Failure Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory to High-Dose Cytarabine-Based Induction Chemotherapy [NCT02441803]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-14Active, not recruiting
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Relapse AML: A Phase 1 Study of Decitabine and Vorinostat Followed by Fludarabine, Cytarabine and G-CSF (FLAG) in Children and Young Adults With Relapsed/Refractory AML [NCT02412475]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-21Terminated(stopped due to We opened a competing study with the TACL consortium)
A Multi-Center Phase 2 Study of Combined Modality Treatment With Ruxolitinib, Decitabine, and Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Post-Transplant Relapse of AML or MDS [NCT04055844]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-17Completed
The Clinical Study of Individualized Induction Therapy for Non-elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Adverse Risk Features Guided by Rapid Screening With FISH and NGS [NCT04752527]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-20Recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Study of Decitabine (DAC) With or Without Hydroxyurea (HY) Versus HY in Patients With Advanced Proliferative Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) [NCT02214407]Phase 3170 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-14Completed
Infusion of 5-Azacytidine (5-AZA) Into the Fourth Ventricle or Resection Cavity in Children and Adults With Recurrent Posterior Fossa Ependymoma: A Phase I Study [NCT03572530]Phase 19 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-08Recruiting
Minimizing Leukemia Relapse: A Phase I, Dose Escalation Study of Decitabine in High Risk Pediatric Leukemia Post Allogeneic Transplant [NCT02264873]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Phase 1-2 Safety and Efficacy Study of DACOGEN in Sequential Administration With Cytarabine in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01853228]Phase 1/Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-22Terminated(stopped due to EMA/PDCO acknowledged that available results from this study do not support further clinical studies in relapsed/refractory AML paediatric patients.)
Phase II Trial of Low Dose Decitabine (Dacogen) in Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis and Post ET/PV Myelofibrosis [NCT00630994]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Stopped due to slow accrual)
A Phase 2 Study of Decitabine in Combination With Midostaurin (PKC412) for Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed FLT3-ITD/TKD Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01846624]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Accrual factor)
Decitabine Plus Cytarabine for Induction of Remission in Newly Diagnosed Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT02121418]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Phase II, Multi-center, Open Label, Randomized Study of Ribavirin and Hedgehog Inhibitor With or Without Decitabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT02073838]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A Study of Combination of Venetoclax, Hypomethylation Agent and Low-dose Cytarabine as a Salvage Therapy in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Had Relapsed/Refractory Disease or Positive Minimal Residual Disease [NCT05362942]Phase 252 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-01Not yet recruiting
Phase I Study of Tegavivint (BC-2059) in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Leukemias [NCT04874480]Phase 154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-27Recruiting
T-Cell Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Plus Hypomethylation for Locally Advanced HER2-Negative Breast Cancer - A Phase 2 Neoadjuvant Window Trial of Pembrolizumab and Decitabine Followed by Standard Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy [NCT02957968]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-24Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Clinical Trial of NY-ESO-1 Protein Immunization in Combination With 5-AZA-2'-Deoxycytidine (Decitabine) in Patients Receiving Liposomal Doxorubicin for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma [NCT01673217]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of High-Dose Deoxyazacytidine, Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide With Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00002831]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-08-01Completed
An Open Label, Phase I, Dose Escalation Trial to Investigate the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Volasertib in Combination With Decitabine in Patients >= 65 Years With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02003573]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-29Terminated
Decitabine and Vorinostat With CD3/CD19 Depleted Haploidentical Donor Natural Killer (NK) Cells for the Treatment of High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) [NCT01593670]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
An Open-label, Multi-center, Phase IIIb Study for Decitabine in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) [NCT01751867]Phase 3135 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
A Phase 1, Parallel, Open-Label Study of the Safety and Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Antileukemic Activity of ASTX660 as a Single Agent and in Combination With ASTX727 in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT04155580]Phase 168 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-12Terminated(stopped due to Study halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or receiving intervention)
A Phase 3b, Randomized, Open-Label, Double Crossover Study Comparing Treatment Preference Between Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine and Azacitidine in Adult Patients With IPSS R Intermediate Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Low Blast Acute Myeloid Leukemia, IPSS Inte [NCT05883956]Phase 342 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Not yet recruiting
Anti-PD-1 Antibody SHR-1210 Alone or in Combination With Decitabine in Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma:an Open-label Phase II Trial [NCT03250962]Phase 2280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-11Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine in Combination With Low-dose Cytarabine as Inductive Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02985372]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Enrolling by invitation
Decitabine+Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide vs Busulfan+Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen for Mixed-lineage-leukemia (MLL)-Rearranged Acute Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT03596892]Phase 2/Phase 3122 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-31Recruiting
Combination of the Hypomethylating Agent Decitabine and the Nuclear Export Receptor XPO-1 Inhibitor Selinexor to Reverse Platinum Resistance in Relapsed/Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer [NCT05983276]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-28Not yet recruiting
Phase I Study of Pacritinib and Chemotherapy in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and FLT3 Mutations [NCT02323607]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-12Completed
A Multicenter Randomized Control Clinical Trail of Evaluating Effect of Demethylation Drug Combined With Chemotherapy in Patients With Intermediate-risk AML After Hematological Complete Remission [NCT03417427]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-01Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Avelumab in Combination With Decitabine as First Line Treatment of Patients With AML, Who Are Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT03395873]Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-29Terminated(stopped due to Recent FDA approval of a new drug for the same patient population)
Decitabine,Cytarabine(Ara-C) and Arsenic Trioxide(ATO) in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia With p53 Mutations [NCT03381781]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-31Not yet recruiting
A Pilot Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Decitabine and Venetoclax in TP53-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT04277442]Phase 113 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-11Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1B Study of KRT-232 (AMG-232) in Combination With Decitabine and Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT03041688]Phase 158 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-08Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Ipilimumab in Combination With Decitabine in Relapsed or Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome/Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT02890329]Phase 148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-05Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Decitabine in Myelofibrosis [NCT00095784]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-29Active, not recruiting
A Pilot Study of Decitabine and Vorinostat With Chemotherapy for Relapsed ALL [NCT01483690]Phase 1/Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Toxicity)
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Decitabine Versus Conventional Chemotherapy for Maintenance Therapy of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(8;21) [NCT03026842]Phase 4180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Trial of OPB-111077 in Combination With Decitabine and Venetoclax for the Treatment of AML Refractory to or Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy [NCT03063944]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-17Active, not recruiting
OAG and Decitabine for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Greater Than or Equal to 65 Years of Age [NCT02029417]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Major revisions needed in study)
A Phase I/II Study of Quizartinib in Combination With Decitabine and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT03661307]Phase 1/Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study of Dexamethasone Combined With Decitabine Versus Dexamethasone in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) [NCT03252457]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-09-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase Ib/II Study Evaluating Navitoclax After Failure of Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT05564650]Phase 1/Phase 237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-12Recruiting
Decitabine Followed by Bone Marrow Transplant and High-Dose Cyclophosphamide for the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Acute Myeloid Neoplasms [NCT01707004]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-16Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00067808 (1) [back to overview]Participant Responses
NCT00085293 (2) [back to overview]Frequency of Adverse Events According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0
NCT00085293 (2) [back to overview]Restoration of Radioiodine Uptake in Metastatic Lesions as Demonstrated by Diagnostic Whole-body Scanning After Decitabine Administration
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]Incidence of Toxicities, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CD34+ Cells
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CXCR4
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CD34+ Cells
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]Response Rate (Complete Response, Partial Response, or Hematologic Improvement.
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CXCR4
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]Hemoglobin F
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]Hemoglobin F
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]Hemoglobin F
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CD34+ Cells
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]Hemoglobin F
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]Hemoglobin F
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]Hemoglobin F
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CD34+ Cells
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CXCR4
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CXCR4
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CXCR4
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CXCR4
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CD34+ Cells
NCT00095784 (20) [back to overview]CD34+ Cells
NCT00113321 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response
NCT00260065 (2) [back to overview]Best Response and Overall Improvement
NCT00260065 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Overall Response
NCT00260832 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Patients 65 Years or Older Who Have Newly Diagnosed de Novo or Secondary AML.
NCT00260832 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) Plus Complete Remission With Incomplete Platelet Recovery (CRp)
NCT00321711 (4) [back to overview]Hypomethylating Agent Dose Reduction and Delay Due to Thrombocytopenia
NCT00321711 (4) [back to overview]Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Thrombocytopenic Event
NCT00321711 (4) [back to overview]Platelet Transfusion
NCT00321711 (4) [back to overview]Achieving an Overall Response (Complete or Partial Response, CR or PR) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00358644 (1) [back to overview]Complete Response = Morphologic Complete Remission (mCR)
NCT00398983 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Relapse-Free Response at 1 Year
NCT00414310 (3) [back to overview]Response Duration
NCT00414310 (3) [back to overview]Participant Response Rates to Decitabine With or Without Valproic Acid in MDS and AML
NCT00414310 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate
NCT00416598 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Completed Maintenance Decitabine.
NCT00416598 (2) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate at 1 Year
NCT00477386 (4) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for Use in Phase II
NCT00477386 (4) [back to overview]Phase II: Percent of Patients With Objective Response, CA125 Response or Stable Disease > 3 Months
NCT00477386 (4) [back to overview]Phase II: Progression Free Survival
NCT00477386 (4) [back to overview]Phase II: Percent of Patients With Objective Response
NCT00479232 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate in Participants Treated With Vorinostat + Decitabine With Refractory or Relapse Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
NCT00479232 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate in Participants Treated With Vorinostat + Decitabine With Intermediate-high Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Untreated Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
NCT00479232 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Events
NCT00492401 (2) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Remission
NCT00492401 (2) [back to overview]Measurement of DNMT Protein in Peripheral Blood or Bone Marrow Cells
NCT00619099 (1) [back to overview]The Overall Improvement Rate
NCT00621023 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With an Unacceptable Toxicity
NCT00621023 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With an Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
NCT00630994 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Severe Adverse Events
NCT00630994 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieve a Confirmed Response (Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Clinical Improvement (CI)), According to International Working Group (IWG) Consensus Criteria.
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Absolute Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF) From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Erythropoietin Levels From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Indirect Bilirubin From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Neutrophil Counts From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Percentage of Annexin-positive Cells From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Platelet Count From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Total Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Number of Evaluable Patients With an Increase From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hb) of ≥1.5 g/dL
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Deformability From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00661726 (12) [back to overview]Change in Percentage of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Hb Concentration From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of LBH589 When Given in Combination With Decitabine
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Phase II: Overall Rate of Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) + Cytogenetic Complete Remission (CRc) + Morphologic Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Rate of Cytogenetic Complete Remission (CRc)
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Rate of Hematologic Improvement.
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Rates of Morphologic Complete Remission With Incomplete Count Recovery (CRi)
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Remission Duration
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT00691938 (10) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability of Regimen as Measured by the Rate of the Most Common Adverse Events Experienced
NCT00715793 (8) [back to overview]6-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate
NCT00715793 (8) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate (DCR)
NCT00715793 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00715793 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00715793 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants That Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00715793 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00715793 (8) [back to overview]Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of DAC + TMZ
NCT00715793 (8) [back to overview]1-year Overall Survival (OS) Rate
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Treatment Response
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Life Assessment
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Number of Events Which Led to Hospitalization
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Duration for Hospitalization
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression or Death
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Independency
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Response
NCT00744757 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00760084 (1) [back to overview]The Number of Subjects With Adverse Events
NCT00778375 (6) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00778375 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Remission [Complete Response (CR), Complete Response With Platelet Recover (CRp) or Complete Response With Incomplete Marrow Recovery (CRi)]
NCT00778375 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (CR, CRp/CRi and PR)
NCT00778375 (6) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT00778375 (6) [back to overview]Disease-free (DFS) or Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Time
NCT00778375 (6) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate for First 60 Participants
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase I and II: Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Decitabine (Cmax)
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase II: Median Time to Remission
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase I: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC)
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase II: Median Time to Improvement
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase II: Median Duration of Remission
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase II: Median Duration of Overall Improvement
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase II: Overall Remission Rate (ORR): Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR)+Partial Remission (PR) - as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria (2000)
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase II: Overall Improvement Rate: Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR)+Partial Response (PR)+Hematological Improvement (HI) - as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria (2000)
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase II: Number of Participants With Cytogenic Response - as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2000 (Major/Minor) and IWG 2006 (Complete/Partial)
NCT00796003 (11) [back to overview]Phase I: Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR)+Partial Remission (PR)+Hematological Improvement (HI) - as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria (2000)
NCT00882102 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Complete Response
NCT00882206 (4) [back to overview]Response to Treatment
NCT00882206 (4) [back to overview]Level of Methylation
NCT00882206 (4) [back to overview]Level of Methylation
NCT00882206 (4) [back to overview]Level of Methylation
NCT00903760 (2) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS) at 1 Year
NCT00903760 (2) [back to overview]Participant Response
NCT00925132 (2) [back to overview]Phase 2 -Number of Patients With a Decrease in Tumor Size Using RECIST and CHOI's Criteria
NCT00925132 (2) [back to overview]Phase I - Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at a Given Dose Level
NCT00968071 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR)
NCT01011283 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR), Defined as Proportion of Patients Having Complete Response (CR) and Marrow Complete Response (mCR) After Completion of 3 Cycles of Study Drug.
NCT01011283 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR), Defined as Proportion of Patients Having Complete Response (CR) and Marrow Complete Response (mCR) After Completion of 6 Cycles of Study Drug.
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Experience > Grade 2 Non-hematologic Toxicity by National Cancer Institute (NCI)/Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) v4 Criteria
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Bone Marrow Evidence of Terminal Differentiation Response to Therapy.
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Particular Genetic Abnormalities Detected by Whole Exome Sequencing Correlation With Clinical Response
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Cytogenetic Response as Per IWG Criteria
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Response as Defined by IWG (International Working Group) Criteria for Myelodysplasia
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Bone Marrow Evidence of Cytotoxicity.
NCT01165996 (7) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Pharmacodynamic Evidence of Drug Effect.
NCT01177540 (7) [back to overview]Time to CR
NCT01177540 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Complete Remission (CR)
NCT01177540 (7) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil Recovery
NCT01177540 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at Baseline and Day 50
NCT01177540 (7) [back to overview]Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)
NCT01177540 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01177540 (7) [back to overview]Time to Platelet Recovery
NCT01193517 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate of Azacitidine, and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)
NCT01193517 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Azacitidine, and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)
NCT01303796 (9) [back to overview]1-year Survival
NCT01303796 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease (dSD)
NCT01303796 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Partial Remission (dPR)
NCT01303796 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission With Incomplete Platelet Count Recovery (dCRp)
NCT01303796 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Hematological Improvement (dHI)
NCT01303796 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Remission (dCR)
NCT01303796 (9) [back to overview]Hospitalized Days
NCT01303796 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01303796 (9) [back to overview]Blood Products Transfused
NCT01378416 (5) [back to overview]Tmax (Time at Which Cmax First Observed)
NCT01378416 (5) [back to overview]Safety: The Most Frequently Reported Adverse Events (Regardless of Causality)
NCT01378416 (5) [back to overview]Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration)
NCT01378416 (5) [back to overview]AUC (0-∞) - Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity
NCT01378416 (5) [back to overview]Average Total Body Clearance (Calculated From Rate and Concentration)
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Complete Remission Rate (CR and CRi)
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Time
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT01483690 (2) [back to overview]Disease Response Rate After Treatment.
NCT01483690 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT).
NCT01498445 (4) [back to overview]Ph I Study: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Dasatinib
NCT01498445 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01498445 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematologic Responses During First 3 Months of Treatment
NCT01498445 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Ratios of mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]AUCtau of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]AUCtau of Cytarabine and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]AUCinf of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) of LDAC in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 1
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Baseline mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at Phase 1B
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR / Complete Response With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) at Phase 1B
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Lead-In
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit - End of Treatment
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Tmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Tmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Tmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 1
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Baseline
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Unfit - End of Treatment
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 1
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Fit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Fit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs Categorized by Seriousness at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs Categorized by Seriousness at Phase 1B
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit (Treatment-related)
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit (All Causality)
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 1B (Treatment-related)
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Phase 1B (All Causality)
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease-related Gene Mutations at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease-related Gene Mutations at Phase 1B
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values Meeting Predefined Criteria at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values Meeting Predefined Criteria at Phase 1B
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Cmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 1B
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Cmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Cmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Baseline mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10
NCT01546038 (70) [back to overview]Pre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib in Phase 2 Fit on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
NCT01593670 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Became Transfusion Independent
NCT01593670 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01593670 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Had Natural Killer (NK) Cell Expansion
NCT01593670 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3 or Higher Non-hematologic Adverse Events
NCT01593670 (5) [back to overview]The Number of Patients Who Achieved a Clinical Response
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]CRiMRD+ Defined as Meeting All Criteria for a CRi But With Evidence of Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]CRMRD- Defined as Morphologic CR Without Evidence of Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]CRMRD+ Defined as a Morphologic CR But With Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Cytogenetic Response Defined as no Detectable Cytogenetic Abnormality in a Subsequent BM Specimen After Induction or Re-induction
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Moderate Neutropenia Defined as an ANC Less Than 1000
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Severe Neutropenia Defined as an ANC Less Than 500
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Thrombocytopenia Defined as Platelet Count Less Than 100,000
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Resistant Disease Defined as Patient Survives at Least 14 Days After Completion of the Last Dose of Induction or Re-induction But Has Persistent Leukemia in Peripheral Blood (PB) or BM
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]CRi Defined as Meeting All Criteria for a Morphologic CR But ANC Remains Less Than 1,000/μL and/or Platelet Count Less Than 100,000/μL
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Severe Prolonged Aplasia
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]TRM With Each Course of Decitabine-priming, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Frequency and Severity of Grade 3, 4, and 5 Toxicities With Each Course of Decitabine-priming, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine According to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version (CTCAE) 4.0
NCT01607645 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Morphologic CR
NCT01687400 (5) [back to overview]Change in Bone Marrow Methylcytosine
NCT01687400 (5) [back to overview]Compare Outcomes of a 10-day Decitabine Per Cycle Regimen to a 5-day Regimen (Historical Controls)
NCT01687400 (5) [back to overview]Peripheral Blood Decitabine Plasma Levels
NCT01687400 (5) [back to overview]Correlation of Patient Specific Mutations With Overall Response Rate
NCT01687400 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Mutation Clearance During Treatment
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil Recovery
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Primary Graft Failure
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Remission After Transplantation
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD According to BMTCTN
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01707004 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery by Day 30
NCT01720225 (2) [back to overview]Participants With a Response
NCT01720225 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Became Transfusion Independent
NCT01729845 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01729845 (4) [back to overview]Remission Rate Including CR and CRp
NCT01729845 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Relapse-free Survival (for Patients Achieving CR or CRp)
NCT01729845 (4) [back to overview]Most Efficacious and Tolerated Dosage of Decitabine (Period 1)
NCT01751867 (7) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Scores of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) Physical Functioning Scale
NCT01751867 (7) [back to overview]Mean Percentage of Duration of Hospitalization (Relative to Days on Study Treatment)
NCT01751867 (7) [back to overview]Cytogenetic Response Rate: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Cytogenetic Response (Complete+Partial) by Status of Clinical Overall Response - International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria
NCT01751867 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate: Percentage of Participants Who Survived During 6 Months and 12 Months of Treatment.
NCT01751867 (7) [back to overview]Transfusion Independence: Number of Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent
NCT01751867 (7) [back to overview]Hematological Improvement Rate: Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR) and Hematologic Improvement (HI) - International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria
NCT01751867 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR): Number of Participants Who Achieved Either Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) - International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria
NCT01786343 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01786343 (3) [back to overview]Participants With a Response
NCT01786343 (3) [back to overview]Response Duration
NCT01794702 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Clofarabine
NCT01794702 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Response
NCT01794702 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01794702 (4) [back to overview]To Determine the Disease-free Survival (DFS).
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in Participants Who Experienced Complete Response or Complete Response With Incomplete Count Recovery
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in Participants Who Experienced Complete Response, Complete Response With Incomplete Count Recovery, or Partial Response
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in Participants Who Experienced Complete Response
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Relapse-Free Survival in Participants With Complete Response or Complete Response With Incomplete Count Recovery.
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Relapse-Free Survival in Participants With Complete Response, Complete Response With Incomplete Count Recovery or Partial Response, and Received Maintenance Therapy
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Demographic Characteristics and Clinical Measures as Potential Predictors of Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Measure
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Best Clinical Response Experienced
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Numbers of Patients (Out of 44) Experiencing Adverse Events With CTCAE Grade ≥ 3 or Adverse Events Grade ≥ 4
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Survival to Four and Eight Weeks and One Year
NCT01829503 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With Clinical Response (CR)
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01846624 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR or CRi at Cycle 1 Day 28
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR or CRi at Cycle 2 Day 28
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR or CRi at End of Study Treatment
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Decitabine
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 1 and 2: Total Clearance of Decitabine
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Duration of Response
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 1 and 2: Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Decitabine
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Response Rate
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 1 and 2: Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 1 and 2: Event-Free Survival
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 1 and 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Decitabine
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01853228 (13) [back to overview]Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cytarabine
NCT01893320 (2) [back to overview]Participants With a Response
NCT01893320 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Vosaroxin in Combination With Decitabine
NCT02003573 (2) [back to overview]Determination of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Based on the Occurrence of Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) in Cycle 1
NCT02003573 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in Cycle 1
NCT02010645 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02029417 (1) [back to overview]Frequency of Adverse Events, Graded According to NCI CTCAE v4.0
NCT02085408 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Complete Remission
NCT02085408 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival by Donor Status
NCT02085408 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02085408 (4) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival for Maintenance
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Transfusion Independence
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Decitabine
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cedazuridine (E7727) and Cedazuridine-epimer
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve of Cedazuridine (E7727) and Cedazuridine-epimer
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Decitabine in Phase 2
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Response in Phase 2 - Kaplan-Meier Estimate
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Response in Phase 1
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response in Phase 1
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematological Improvement
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Cedazuridine (E7727) and Cedazuridine-epimer
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity in Phase 1
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Mean Decitabine Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Ratio (5-day AUC0-t) in Phase 2
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Mean Decitabine Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-t) on Day 5 by Cohort in Phase 1
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response in Phase 2
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Mean Maximum %LINE Demethylation in Phase 1
NCT02103478 (17) [back to overview]Mean Maximum %LINE Demethylation in Phase 2
NCT02109744 (3) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT02109744 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change in Blast Percentage in Marrow
NCT02109744 (3) [back to overview]Blast Percentage in Peripheral Blood
NCT02121418 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival of Patients Over Age 60 With Newly Diagnosed AML/High Risk MDS
NCT02121418 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT02257138 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Post-MPN Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With JAK2 Mutations (Phase 2)
NCT02257138 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Ruxolitinib Phosphate (Phase I)
NCT02257138 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Response (Complete Response [CR] + CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery) (Phase 2)
NCT02257138 (4) [back to overview]Number of JAK2 Positive+ and JAK2 Negative- Participants With a Response (Phase 2)
NCT02332889 (1) [back to overview]Tolerability (Number of Participants Without Adverse Events)
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) at the End of Induction
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Composite Complete Remission at the End of Induction
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT02343939 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Exposure of Entospletinib
NCT02472145 (7) [back to overview]Part B: Time to Best Response
NCT02472145 (7) [back to overview]Part B: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) Plus Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Complete Response With Incomplete Recovery (CRi)
NCT02472145 (7) [back to overview]Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR and CRi (Overall Response Rate)
NCT02472145 (7) [back to overview]Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (Complete Response Rate) Based on Investigator Assessment
NCT02472145 (7) [back to overview]Part B: Event-free Survival (EFS) Based on Investigator Assessment
NCT02472145 (7) [back to overview]Part B: Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Investigator Assessment
NCT02472145 (7) [back to overview]Part B: Overall Survival
NCT02487563 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Platelet Count Recovery
NCT02487563 (2) [back to overview]Megakaryocyte Count
NCT02532010 (7) [back to overview]Remission Duration
NCT02532010 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02532010 (7) [back to overview]Complete Remission Rate
NCT02532010 (7) [back to overview]Overall Remission Rate
NCT02532010 (7) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT02532010 (7) [back to overview]Time to Complete Response
NCT02532010 (7) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase I-Ib and Dose Ranging Part: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase I-Ib and Dose Ranging Part: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase Ib: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase II: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase II: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase II: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per irRC
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) Count
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase I-Ib and Dose Ranging Part: Dose Intensity of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase I-Ib: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase Ib: Dose Intensity of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase II: Dose Intensity of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase II: Dose Intensity of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Phase II: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per irRC
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]All-Collected Deaths
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]All-Collected Deaths
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of CD163
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of CD163
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of CD8+
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of CD8+
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of CD8+
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of LAG-3
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of LAG-3
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of PD-L1
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of PD-L1
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of TIM-3
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Baseline Expression of TIM-3
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Sabatolimab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Spartalizumab
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-sabatolimab Antibodies
NCT02608268 (46) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Anti-spartalizumab Antibodies
NCT02650986 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities
NCT02650986 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Feasibility Concerns in Manufacturing of NY-ESO-1/ dnTGFbetaRII Engineered Cells
NCT02664181 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02664181 (2) [back to overview]Time-to-Progression
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Composite Complete Remission Rate
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Mortality Rates at Day 30 and Day 60
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Type, Incidence, Severity, Seriousness, and Relatedness of Adverse Events
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Composite Complete Remission (CRc) Rate
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Duration of Remission
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Leukemia-free Survival
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Time to Complete Remission
NCT02785900 (10) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Laboratory Abnormalities
NCT02878785 (1) [back to overview]Phase 1 - Dose Finding
NCT02921061 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Negative (MRDneg) Complete Remission (Phase II)
NCT02921061 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Survival
NCT02921061 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Relapse-free Survival
NCT02921061 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Event-free Survival
NCT02921061 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for Decitabine When Given Together With G-CLAM Toxicities (DLTs) (Phase I)
NCT02921061 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission (Complete Remission [CR]/CR With Incomplete Peripheral Blood Count Recovery [CRi])
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities by Type and Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response Rate (ORR) [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities by Type and Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) by Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against PF-06747143 [Part 1]
NCT02954653 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Part 1]
NCT02957968 (7) [back to overview]Evaluation of Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) Identified in Blood Samples Post-pembrolizumab Compared to MDSC Found in Blood Samples Collected at Baseline.
NCT02957968 (7) [back to overview]Evaluation of Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) Identified in Blood Samples Post-decitabine Compared to MDSC Found in Blood Samples Collected at Baseline.
NCT02957968 (7) [back to overview]Evaluation of Expression of Protein Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Within Tumor, Stroma, and Infiltrating Immune Cells Combined, at Baseline and Following Immunotherapy.
NCT02957968 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and Post-therapy Lymph Nodes.
NCT02957968 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients Meeting Criteria for Lymphocyte-predominant Breast Cancer (LPBC) Following Treatment With Decitabine and Pembrolizumab
NCT02957968 (7) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Reported During and After Immune Treatment (ie, Decitabine and Pembrolizumab)
NCT02957968 (7) [back to overview]The Percentage of Increase in Tumor and Stroma With Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) From Baseline Pre-treatment Biopsy to Post-immunotherapy Biopsy Following Administration of Decitabine Followed by Pembrolizumab.
NCT02996474 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02996474 (6) [back to overview]Median Duration (Days) of Response From Initial Achievement of Response to Loss of Response (mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD)
NCT02996474 (6) [back to overview]Median Duration (Days) of Best Response From Initial Achievement of Best Response to Loss of Best Response (by the Order of mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD)
NCT02996474 (6) [back to overview]Median Days to Best Response From Start of Study to Initial Achievement of Best Response (by the Order of mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD)
NCT02996474 (6) [back to overview]Median Days to First Response From Start of Study to Initial Achievement of First Response (mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD)
NCT02996474 (6) [back to overview]Feasibility of a Novel Combination of Pembrolizumab and Decitabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Participants
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Response Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Survival Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Survival Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Time to Stem Cell Transplant Among Participants Who Are Suitable Candidates for Transplant and Have an Identified Donor
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Response Compared Between Patients With de Novo AML Versus Patients With Secondary AML Versus Patients With Treatment-related AML
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Response Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Responding TP53 Mutated Patients (CR, CRi)
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival of Participants With TP53 Mutation
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Median Time to Leukemia Relapse (TTLR) in Non-transplant Patients
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Median Number of Hospital Stays
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Average Number of Hospital Days
NCT03063203 (13) [back to overview]Survival Compared Between Patients With de Novo AML Versus Patients With Secondary AML Versus Patients With Treatment-related AML
NCT03233724 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT03233724 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)
NCT03233724 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Dose Limiting Hematologic Toxicity (DLT)
NCT03233724 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Tetrahydrouridine
NCT03233724 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Decitabine
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR)
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Onvansertib
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Area Under the Curve Over the First 24 Hours AUC(0-24) for Onvansertib
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Onvansertib
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) for Onvansertib
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Number of Participants With Partial Response (PR)
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Number of Participants Who Achieved a Morphologic Leukemia-free (MLF) State
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Event-free Survival (EFS)
NCT03303339 (13) [back to overview]Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03593915 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
NCT03941964 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Post-baseline Transfusion Independence
NCT03941964 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CR + CRi)
NCT03941964 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR)
NCT03941964 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Relapse
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (aGVHD II-IV)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Relapse
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Efficacy of Combined Modality Treatment (Ruxolitinib, Decitabine, and DLI) for Relapsed AML or MDS Post Allo-HCT: Rate of Overall Survival (OS)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Efficacy of Combined Modality Treatment (Ruxolitinib, Decitabine, and DLI) for Relapsed AML or MDS Post Allo-HCT: Rate of Overall Survival (OS)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR)
NCT04055844 (12) [back to overview]Best Response
NCT04146038 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Response
NCT04146038 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Incidence With of Salicylate + Venetoclax + Decitabine

Participant Responses

Objective responses by International Working Group criteria: 'Complete Response' (CR) defined as Normalization of the peripheral blood and bone marrow with <5% bone marrow blasts, a peripheral blood granulocyte count > (1.0 x 109/ L, and a platelet count > 100 x 109/L); 'Other Response' including Partial Remission (PR) defined as above, except for the presence of 6-15% marrow blasts, or 50% reduction if <15% at start of treatment combined with participants who meet all criteria for CR except for platelet recovery to >100 x 109/L; and 'No Response'. (NCT00067808)
Timeframe: Response to treatment after 8 weeks of therapy

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseOther ResponseNo Response
Decitabine 10 mg/m2 IV467
Decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV472125
Decitabine 20 mg/m2 SQ446

[back to top]

Frequency of Adverse Events According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0

Summary of Adverse Events (AEs) by Maximum Grade where Grade 1 AEs >20%, Grade 2 AEs >10%, all Grade 3, Grade 4 and Grade 5 reported. (NCT00085293)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 1, NauseaGrade 1, FatigueGrade 1, Oral MucositisGrade 1, Pharyngolaryngeal painGrade 1, Decreased white blood cellGrade 2, FatigueGrade 2, Decreased white blood cellGrade 2, Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 2, Lymphocyte count decreasedGrade 3, Decreased white blood cellGrade 3, Neutrophil count decreasedGrade 3, Febrile neutropeniaGrade 3, InfectionsGrade 3, respiratory disordersGrade 4, Decreased white blood cellGrade 5
Treatment4233252525252516164225888580

[back to top]

Restoration of Radioiodine Uptake in Metastatic Lesions as Demonstrated by Diagnostic Whole-body Scanning After Decitabine Administration

"Number of participants with restoration of radioiodine responsiveness as determined by visible uptake on radioiodine scan in radiographically detectable metastatic foci of papillary or follicular thyroid carcinoma. Response to Decitabine defined as demonstration of radioiodine uptake determined by centralized blinded review of diagnostic scan. All who demonstrated radioiodine uptake in metastatic foci following decitabine therapy would then undergo thyroid hormone withdrawal and a second course of decitabine in preparation for therapeutic administration of radioiodine.~Diagnostic radioiodine scans following decitabine therapy (week 3) with a radioiodine scan following thyrotropin alfa stimulation, 0.9 mg intramuscular (IM) injection 24 and 48 hours before administration of the 131I for imaging. Whole body scans (WBS) performed using a gamma camera." (NCT00085293)
Timeframe: Week 3 following 2 weeks of Decitabine therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment0

[back to top]

Incidence of Toxicities, Graded According to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0

Percentage of patients experiencing any toxicity, any grade level. Additional details on adverse events are reported in Adverse Events section. (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days of last dose of decitabine

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I100

[back to top]

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously. (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1

Interventioncells x 10^6/L (Geometric Mean)
Arm I117

[back to top]

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL) (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Arm I4.4

[back to top]

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously. (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 5

Interventioncells x 10^6/L (Geometric Mean)
Arm I35

[back to top]

Response Rate (Complete Response, Partial Response, or Hematologic Improvement.

"Complete response is normalization of counts and transfusion-independence.~Partial response is hemoglobin increase to normal levels, multilineage improvement including absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and/or platelets.~Hematologic improvement is red cell transfusion-independence or >50% increase in platelet levels." (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Up to 36 weeks (6 cycles)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I37

[back to top]

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL) (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 5

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Arm I6.0

[back to top]

Hemoglobin F

"Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples.~Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker." (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 5

Interventionpercentage of HbF (Mean)
Arm I1.5

[back to top]

Hemoglobin F

"Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples.~Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker." (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 12

Interventionpercentage of HbF (Mean)
Arm I1.5

[back to top]

Hemoglobin F

"Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples.~Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker." (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1

Interventionpercentage of HbF (Mean)
Arm I1.5

[back to top]

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously. (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 12

Interventioncells x 10^6/L (Geometric Mean)
Arm I21

[back to top]

Hemoglobin F

"Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples.~Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker." (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 5

Interventionpercentage of HbF (Mean)
Arm I1.6

[back to top]

Hemoglobin F

"Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples.~Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker." (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 12

Interventionpercentage of HbF (Mean)
Arm I1.4

[back to top]

Hemoglobin F

"Percentage of hemoglobin F as a proportion of total Hb (%HbF) measured by HPLC on peripheral blood samples.~Midpoint of 0.5% imputed for values reported as below limit of detection (1.0%). Hemoglobin F has been previously shown to be upregulated by decitabine in other hematologic disorders- sickle cell disease specifically. The rationale for exploring it in this study was to evaluate its potential utility as a biomarker of drug effect/PD marker." (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1

Interventionpercentage of HbF (Mean)
Arm I1.6

[back to top]

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously. (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1

Interventioncells x 10^6/L (Geometric Mean)
Arm I76

[back to top]

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL) (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 12

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Arm I7.1

[back to top]

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL) (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 2, Day 1

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Arm I4.0

[back to top]

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL) (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 5

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Arm I5.7

[back to top]

CXCR4

CXCR4 gene expression level measured by real-time RT_PCR. Ratio of CXCR4 vs a housekeeping gene (i.e., ABL) (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 12

Interventionratio (Geometric Mean)
Arm I6.4

[back to top]

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously. (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 5

Interventioncells x 10^6/L (Geometric Mean)
Arm I71

[back to top]

CD34+ Cells

CD34 positive(+) cells are determined by flow immunostaining and light scatter in peripheral blood. Samples are then analyzed by flow cytometry, and CD34+ cells quantitated after 75,000 CD45 events are studied. (At least 75,000 CD45 events must be studied to ensure accuracy of the assay). Absolute numbers are determined by multiplying the % CD34+ cells by the total white blood cell count obtained on a CBC that is processed simultaneously. (NCT00095784)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 12

Interventioncells x 10^6/L (Geometric Mean)
Arm I35

[back to top]

Overall Response

Participants with Overall Response, categorized as 'Complete Response' to represent remission or 'No Complete Response' for lack of remission. Response evaluation after completing one course of therapy (8-12 weeks), then bone marrow aspiration to document remission every 1-3 courses. (NCT00113321)
Timeframe: Blood tests baseline and after completing 8-12 weeks of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseNo Complete Response
Decitabine313

[back to top]

Best Response and Overall Improvement

Overall Improvement = complete remission + marrow complete remission + partial remission + hematologic improvement (CR+mCR+PR+HI) (NCT00260065)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Overall ImprovementComplete Remission (CR)Marrow Complete Remission (mCR)Partial Remission (PR)Hematologic Improvement (HI)
Decitabine 20 mg/m2 Intravenous511716018

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Overall Response

Overall Response = complete remission (disappearance of all target lesions) + partial remission (at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions) (NCT00260065)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decitabine 20 mg/m2 Intravenous33

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Patients 65 Years or Older Who Have Newly Diagnosed de Novo or Secondary AML.

The interval from date of randomization to the date of death from any cause or the last date the subject was known to be alive or 5 years whichever occurs first. (NCT00260832)
Timeframe: The interval from date of randomization to the date of death from any cause or the last date the subject was known to be alive or 5 years whichever occurs first.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cytarabine or Supportive Care5.0
Dacogen (Decitabine) Only7.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) Plus Complete Remission With Incomplete Platelet Recovery (CRp)

Morphologic CR plus CRp rate where Morphologic leukemia-free state defined as less that (<) 5 percent (%) blasts in an aspirate sample with marrow spicules and a count of greater than or equal to (>=) 200 nucleated cells (there should have been no blasts with Auer rods or persistence of extramedullary disease) plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (>)1,000 per microliter (/mcL), platelet count of >=100,000/mcL, and the participant must have been independent of transfusions for at least 1 week before each assessment. There was no duration requirement for confirmation of this designation and Morphologic CR without the requirement of platelet count >=100,000/mcL. (NCT00260832)
Timeframe: Post randomization when at least one post-baseline bone marrow assessment or peripheral blood count data available (up to 29.5 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cytarabine or Supportive Care7.8
Dacogen (Decitabine) Only17.8

[back to top]

Hypomethylating Agent Dose Reduction and Delay Due to Thrombocytopenia

Occurrence of hypomethylating agent dose reduction and delay due to thrombocytopenia (NCT00321711)
Timeframe: Treatment period (up to 20 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Azacitidine1
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 500 mcg Plus Azacitidine1
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Azacitidine0
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Decitabine0
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Decitabine0

[back to top]

Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Thrombocytopenic Event

Occurrence of a clinically significant thrombocytopenic event within the participant, defined as any platelet count obtained from day 15 of cycle 1 through the end of the interim follow-up visit that was less than 50 x 10^9/L or receipt of platelet transfusions at any time through the interim follow-up visit. (NCT00321711)
Timeframe: Treatment period (up to 20 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Azacitidine11
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 500 mcg Plus Azacitidine8
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Azacitidine10
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Decitabine11
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Decitabine12

[back to top]

Platelet Transfusion

Occurrence of one or more platelet transfusions from study day 1 through the interim follow-up visit (16 weeks) (NCT00321711)
Timeframe: Study day 1 through the interim follow-up visit (up to 20 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Azacitidine9
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 500 mcg Plus Azacitidine6
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Azacitidine5
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Decitabine8
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Decitabine7

[back to top]

Achieving an Overall Response (Complete or Partial Response, CR or PR) at the End of the Treatment Period

CR = decrease in bone marrow blast (≤5%) and improvement in peripheral blood counts (Hgb ≥ 11 g/dL, platelets ≥ 100x10^9/L, neutrophils ≥ 1x10^9/L, peripheral blasts=0%). PR = improvement in peripheral blood counts plus a decrease in bone marrow blasts ≥50% but not ≤5, or decrease in International Prognostic Scoring System score. (NCT00321711)
Timeframe: Treatment period (up to 20 weeks)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Azacitidine2
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 500 mcg Plus Azacitidine1
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Azacitidine1
Romiplostim (AMG 531) Placebo Plus Decitabine3
Romiplostim (AMG 531) 750 mcg Plus Decitabine5

[back to top]

Complete Response = Morphologic Complete Remission (mCR)

(NCT00358644)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Decitabine 20 mg/m2 Intravenous13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Relapse-Free Response at 1 Year

Relapse free response defined an absence of relapse at one year of follow up. (NCT00398983)
Timeframe: Baseline to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decitabine 20 mg/m^210
No Study Drug10

[back to top]

Response Duration

The date of Response to the date of loss of response or last follow-up. (NCT00414310)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Decitabine12.9
Decitabine + Valproic Acid6.3

[back to top]

Participant Response Rates to Decitabine With or Without Valproic Acid in MDS and AML

Complete Remission (CR): CR defined as normalization of peripheral blood and bone marrow with < 5% bone marrow blasts, a peripheral blood granulocyte count > (1.0 x 10^9/ L, and a platelet count > 100 x 10^9/L). CRi or complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery is defined as above, but platelets <100 x 109/L. Partial Remission: as above except for the presence of 6-15% marrow blasts, or 50% reduction if <15% at start of treatment. Clinical Benefit: In MDS/CMML, as per International Working Group (IWG) criteria, platelets increase by 50% and to above 30 x 10^9/L untransfused (if lower than that pretherapy); or granulocytes increase by 100% and to above 10^9/L (if lower than that pretherapy); or hemoglobin increase by 2 g/dl; or transfusion independent; or splenomegaly reduction by > 50%; or monocytosis reduction by > 50% if pretreatment > 5 x 10^9/L. In addition to IWG criteria, in AML, a decrease in bone marrow blasts to <5% also considered clinical benefit. (NCT00414310)
Timeframe: 1 Year

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Complete Remission (CR)Complete Remission Without Platelet Recovery (CRi)Partial Remission (PD)
Decitabine2260
Decitabine + Valproic Acid2991

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate

Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up. (NCT00414310)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Decitabine11.2
Decitabine + Valproic Acid11.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Completed Maintenance Decitabine.

To determine feasibility of decitabine maintenance, this outcome measures the number of participants who completed all 8 planned cycles of decitabine maintenance as per protocol. (NCT00416598)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decatibine Maintenance62

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate at 1 Year

"For participants who achieved a complete remission (CR), this is the percentage of participants who were alive and relapse free at 1 year. The 1 year rate, with 95% confidence interval, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method~A CR is defined as those with > 20% cellularity of bone marrow biopsy, no presence of extramedullary leukemia for AML, <5 % myeloblast cells for bone marrow with peripheral blood and normal complete blood count (absolute neutrophils > 1000 mL and platelets >= 100,000 mL)." (NCT00416598)
Timeframe: At 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decatibine Maintenance80

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for Use in Phase II

The definition of MTD will follow the standard definition of the phase I 3+3 trial concept. Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) will be scored in the first cycle. Patients will be monitored for 28 days (a cycle) to determine whether a DLT is experienced for the specific dose level. (NCT00477386)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionmg/m2 IV QD x 5 days (Number)
Phase I Dose Finding10

[back to top]

Phase II: Percent of Patients With Objective Response, CA125 Response or Stable Disease > 3 Months

The percent of patients having an objective response (Complete Response or Partial Response) or CA125 response (Complete Response or Partial Response) or stable disease > 3 months will be estimated with a 95% exact binomial confidence interval for the percent of patients receiving drug. (NCT00477386)
Timeframe: screening until end of study (approx 12-18 months)

Interventionpercent of patients (Number)
Phase II Dose Treatment70.6

[back to top]

Phase II: Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival times will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. If a patient progresses or dies, the time till that event will be used. If a patient does not progress or die on the study, the patient will be censored at the last available visit. Confidence intervals on the median will be constructed. (NCT00477386)
Timeframe: Baseline until disease progression or last visit

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase II Dose Treatment10.2

[back to top]

Phase II: Percent of Patients With Objective Response

The percent of patients having an objective response (Complete Response or Partial Response) will be estimated with a 95% exact binomial confidence interval for the percent of patients receiving drug. (NCT00477386)
Timeframe: screening until end of study (approx 12-18 months)

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Phase II Dose Treatment35.3

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate in Participants Treated With Vorinostat + Decitabine With Refractory or Relapse Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

Objective Response Rate was measured in participants with refractory or relapse AML (acute myelogenous leukemia) in combination with Decitabine who were treated with vorinostat and decitabine on either a concurrent or sequential regimen. The Objective response was defined as any confirmed complete remission or any confirmed partial remission for AML participants and complete remission, confirmed partial remission or confirmed hematologic improvement for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) participants. (NCT00479232)
Timeframe: Approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Refractory or Relapsed AML, Concurrent7.1
Refractory or Relapsed AML, Sequential0.0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate in Participants Treated With Vorinostat + Decitabine With Intermediate-high Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Untreated Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

Objective Response Rate was measured in participants with intermediate-high risk MDS or untreated AML who were treated with vorinostat and decitabine either on a concurrent or sequential regimen. The Objective response was defined as any confirmed complete remission or any confirmed partial remission for AML participants and complete remission, confirmed partial remission or confirmed hematologic improvement for MDS participants. (NCT00479232)
Timeframe: Approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Untreated AML or Intermediate, Concurrent35.0
Untreated AML or Intermediate, Sequential13.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Events

Participants who received at least one dose of vorinostat in combination with decitabine intravenous (IV) at a dose of 20 mg/m^2 daily for 5 days along with oral vorinostat 400 mg once daily for 7 to 14 days in a 28-day cycle concurrently or sequentially, were evaluated to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) determined by the number of participants experiencing dose limiting toxicity (DLT) events defined as any Grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicity (reported adverse event) and/or myelosuppression lasting >42 days. (NCT00479232)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 28 of Cycle 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Concurrent, Vorinostat 400mg qd x 7d/4wk + Decitabine0
Concurrent, Vorinostat 400mg qd x 7d/2wk + Decitabine0
Concurrent, Vorinostat 400mg qd x 14d/4wk + Decitabine (MTD)0
Sequential, Vorinostat 400mg qd x 7d/4wk + Decitabine0
Sequential, Vorinostat 400mg qd x 10d/4wk + Decitabine0
Sequential, Vorinostat 400mg qd x 14d/4wk + Decitabine (MTD)1

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Remission

Per International Working Group criteria: Morphologic complete remission (CRm): Defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, including <5% blasts in BM aspirate with marrow spicules and a count of > 200 nucleated cells and no blasts with Auer rods, no persistent extramedullary disease, ANC > 1000/uL, platelet count > 100,000/uL. Patient must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment. Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): Defined as CR with the exception of neutropenia <1000/uL or thrombocytopenia <100,000/ul. Complete Remission Rate (CRm + CRi) (NCT00492401)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

Interventionpatients (Number)
Decitabine25

[back to top]

Measurement of DNMT Protein in Peripheral Blood or Bone Marrow Cells

Expression studies were conducted using quantitative RT PCR. Expression of DNMT were normalized to the internal control to the ABL and levels of miR-29 to RNA U44. (NCT00492401)
Timeframe: Pre treatment

,
Interventiondelta delta CT values (Median)
Expression levels of MiR-29bExpression levels of DNMT3a
Non Responder0.00243050.000341819
Responders0.00563940.000196066

[back to top]

The Overall Improvement Rate

"Defined as proportion of patients having complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), marrow complete remission (mCR), or hematologic improvement.~Based on Modified International Working Group Response Criteria for Altering Natural History of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.~Complete Remission: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines. Persistent dysplasia will be noted. Peripheral blood Hgb ≥ 11 g/dL; Platelets ≥ 100 X 109/L; Neutrophils ≥ 1.0 X 109/Lb; Blasts 0%.~Partial Remission: All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except: Bone marrow blasts decreased by ≥ 50% over pretreatment but still > 5%.~Marrow Complete Remission: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥ 50% over pretreatment. Peripheral blood: if hematological improvement responses, they will be noted in addition to marrow CR.~HI Improvement: shown in increases in hemoglobin, platelet and neutrophil response." (NCT00619099)
Timeframe: Up to one year

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Overall Improvement RateComplete ResponseMarrow Complete ResponsePartial ResponseHematologic Improvement
Schedule A: SQ 3 Consecutive Days23.316.3007.0
Schedule B: SQ Once Every 7 Days22.704.54.513.6

[back to top]

Number of Patients With an Unacceptable Toxicity

Any of the following non-hematologic toxicities that causes a patient's therapy to be suspended or discontinued: Creatinine > 2x baseline value; serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), Total bilirubin > 2x the upper limit of normal; Febrile neutropenia; Uncontrolled infection; Hepatotoxicity defined as an increase in serum bilirubin, SGOT, or alkaline phosphatase to >5 times baseline value); nephrotoxicity (defined as serum creatinine >3.5 times the ULN); neurological impairment (defined as somnolence, seizures, or impaired mentation); severe peripheral neuropathy, or any non-hematologic grade 4 toxic event. (NCT00621023)
Timeframe: During the treatment period and for 30 days after last dose of study drug

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Participants4

[back to top]

Number of Patients With an Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

Complete response and Partial response are defined using 2000 international working group (IWG) criteria. The Primary criteria for a CR is a repeat bone marrow showing < 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines, with no evidence for dysplasia . A PR meets all the CR criteria except Blasts decreased by >50% over pretreatment, or a less advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) French American British (FAB) classification than pretreatment. (NCT00621023)
Timeframe: after 4 cycles of therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Participants0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Severe Adverse Events

Severe adverse events were defined as grade 3 or higher, regardless of attribution to study drugs. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3. Adverse events were assessed every cycle during treatment. (NCT00630994)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AnemiaPlatelet count decreasedNeutrophil count decreasedLeukopeniaAlkaline Phosphatase IncreasedAscitesClostridial InfectionHyperglycemia
Decitabine31211111

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieve a Confirmed Response (Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Clinical Improvement (CI)), According to International Working Group (IWG) Consensus Criteria.

"Confirmed response: objective status of CR, PR, or CI on 2 consecutive evaluations >=4 weeks apart.~CR:Complete resolution of disease-related symptoms and signs; peripheral blood count remission; normal leukocyte differential; bone marrow histologic remission.~PR: All criteria for CR except the bone marrow histologic remission. CI: one of the following in the absence of both disease progression and CR/PR: minimum (MI) 20-g/L increase (INC) in hemoglobin level; MI 50% reduction in palpable splenomegaly (>=10cm); MI 100% INC in platelet count(>=50000x10^9/L) or ANC (>=0.5x10^9/L)" (NCT00630994)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks during treatment (up to 16 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decitabine1

[back to top]

Change in Absolute Fetal Hemoglobin (HbF) From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Decitabine0.65

[back to top]

Change in Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionX (10^9)/L (Mean)
Decitabine-34.00

[back to top]

Change in Erythropoietin Levels From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionmIU/mL (Mean)
Decitabine-43.78

[back to top]

Change in Indirect Bilirubin From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Interventionµmol/L (Mean)
Decitabine-17.36

[back to top]

Change in Neutrophil Counts From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionX (10^9)/L (Mean)
Decitabine-3.15

[back to top]

Change in Percentage of Annexin-positive Cells From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Intervention% of Annexin-Positive Cells (Mean)
Decitabine-1.26

[back to top]

Change in Platelet Count From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionX (10^9)/L (Mean)
Decitabine355.0

[back to top]

Change in Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) From Baseline to Nadir (the Follow-up Time Point With the Lowest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionU/L (Mean)
Decitabine-116.60

[back to top]

Change in Total Hemoglobin (Hb) From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Interventiong/dL (Mean)
Decitabine1.16

[back to top]

Number of Evaluable Patients With an Increase From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hb) of ≥1.5 g/dL

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decitabine2

[back to top]

Change in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Deformability From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

Deformability was assessed by ektacytometry. Normal RBC have maximal deformability, measurable by osmotic ektacytometry, at isotonicity (290 mosmol). A decrease on the Deformability Index (measured in arbitrary units) corresponds to an impairment in the cell membrane's ability to alter its shape under stress. (NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
BaselineChange From Baseline
Decitabine0.430.09

[back to top]

Change in Percentage of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Hb Concentration From Baseline to Peak (the Follow-up Time Point With the Highest Value)

(NCT00661726)
Timeframe: up to 12 weeks

Intervention% of RBC Hb Concentration (Mean)
Decitabine7.06

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Event-free survival is defined as the interval from the date of first dose of study drug to date of treatment failure, relapse from CR, or death due to any cause. (NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Completion of follow-up (median follow-up was 58 months)

Interventiondays (Median)
Level 1-Phase II (All Patients Enrolled)104

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the date of first dose of study drug to the date of death from any cause. (NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Completion of follow-up (median follow-up was 58 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Level 1-Phase II (All Patients Enrolled)6.44

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of LBH589 When Given in Combination With Decitabine

(NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Completion of Phase I enrollment for MTD (approximately 26 months)

Interventionmg (level 5b dosing schedule) (Number)
Phase I (Includes Levels 1-5)40

[back to top]

Phase II: Overall Rate of Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) + Cytogenetic Complete Remission (CRc) + Morphologic Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)

"Morphologic complete remission (CR). A CR designation requires that the patient achieve the morphologic leukemia-free state with less than 5% blasts in an aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of at least 200 nucleated cells. There should be no blasts with Auer rods or persistence of extramedullary disease. Patients must also have an absolute neutrophil count of more than 1,000/μLand platelets of 100,000/μL.~Cytogenetic complete remission (CRc). A CRc will be defined by the achievement of a CR with reversion to a normal karyotype in a minimum of 20 metaphases analyzed by cytogenetics.~Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): Achievement of all of the criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (< 1,000/μL) or thrombocytopenia (< 100,000/μL)." (NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Level 1-Phase II (All Patients Enrolled)11.8

[back to top]

Rate of Cytogenetic Complete Remission (CRc)

Cytogenetic complete remission (CRc). A CRc will be defined by the achievement of a CR with reversion to a normal karyotype in a minimum of 20 metaphases analyzed by cytogenetics. (NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Level 1-Phase II (All Patients Enrolled)3.9

[back to top]

Rate of Hematologic Improvement.

"-Hematologic improvement (HI). Includes the following categories:~Erythroid response: Hemoglobin increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL over baseline in which the pretreatment hemoglobin is < 11 g/dL or reduction of RBC transfusions of at least 4 RBC transfusions / 8 wk compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks.~Platelet response. Absolute increase of > 30 x 10^9/L for patients starting with 20 x 10^9/L or increase from < 20 x 10^9/L to > 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%~Neutrophil response. At least 100% increase and an absolute increase > 0.5 x 109/L for patients with pretreatment neutrophils < 1.0 x 109/L)" (NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Level 1-Phase II (All Patients Enrolled)2.0

[back to top]

Rates of Morphologic Complete Remission With Incomplete Count Recovery (CRi)

Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): Achievement of all of the criteria for CR except for residual neutropenia (< 1,000/μL) or thrombocytopenia (< 100,000/μL). (NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Level 1-Phase II (All Patients Enrolled)3.9

[back to top]

Remission Duration

Defined as the first date that all criteria for CR, CRi or HI are fulfilled to the date of treatment failure, relapse from CR, or death due to any cause. (NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Completion of follow-up (median follow-up was 58 months)

Interventiondays (Median)
Level 1-Phase II (All Patients Enrolled)361

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response is defined as the date of the first dose of study drug to the date that all criteria for CR or CRi are fulfilled. (NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Level 1-Phase II (All Patients Enrolled)91.5

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability of Regimen as Measured by the Rate of the Most Common Adverse Events Experienced

Adverse events will be assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. (NCT00691938)
Timeframe: Up to 13 months after start of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
FatigueFebrile neutropeniaDiarrheaNausea
Level 1-Phase II (All Patients Enrolled)88767569

[back to top]

6-month Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate

(NCT00715793)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DAC (Decitabine) + TMZ (Temozolomide)32.4

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Using RECIST v1.0 criteria, disease control rate (DCR) was determined by the number of participants with complete response (CR) + the number of participants with partial response (PR) + the number of participants with stable disease (SD) / the number of participants with complete response (CR) + the number of participants with partial response (PR) + the number of participants with stable disease (SD) + the number of participants with progressive disease (PD). Per RECIST v1.0 criteria (assessed by MRI or CT): Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response (PR) nor sufficient increase to to qualify for Progressive Disease (PD); PD, 20% increase in the sum if target lesion or the appearance of new lesions; Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT00715793)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DAC (Decitabine) + TMZ (Temozolomide)61

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Using RECIST v1.0 criteria, overall response rate (ORR) was determined by the number of participants with complete response (CR) + the number of participants with partial response (PR) / the number of participants with complete response (CR) + the number of participants with partial response (PR) + the number of participants with stable disease (SD) + the number of participants with progressive disease (PD), multiplied by 100. Per RECIST v1.0 criteria (assessed by MRI or CT): Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response (PR) nor sufficient increase to to qualify for Progressive Disease (PD); PD, 20% increase in the sum if target lesion or the appearance of new lesions; Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT00715793)
Timeframe: Up to 30 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DAC (Decitabine) + TMZ (Temozolomide)18

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from study entry until the death or date of last contract. (NCT00715793)
Timeframe: Up to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
DAC (Decitabine) + TMZ (Temozolomide)12.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants That Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia which lasts >7 days; grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia; grade 3 or greater non-hematological toxic effects. (NCT00715793)
Timeframe: Up to 26 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dose Level 1:DAC (Decitabine) 0.075 mg/kg + TMZ (Temozolomide)0
Dose Level 2:DAC (Decitabine) 0.15 mg/kg + TMZ (Temozolomide)17

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from study entry until the documented radiological or symptomatic progression. Per RECIST v1.0 criteria (assessed by MRI or CT): Progressive Disease (PD); PD, 20% increase in the sum if target lesion or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00715793)
Timeframe: Up to 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
DAC (Decitabine) + TMZ (Temozolomide)3.4

[back to top] [back to top]

1-year Overall Survival (OS) Rate

Percentage of patients alive at one year (number of patients alive / total number of evaluable (analyzed) patients). (NCT00715793)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
DAC (Decitabine) + TMZ (Temozolomide)56

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Treatment Response

Hematologic treatment response was assessed as per IWG 2006 criteria. This is measured in erythroid(HI-E), platelet(HI-P) and neutrophil(HI-N) lineages. HI-E response(pre-treatment<11 gram per deciliter [g/dl]):hemoglobin increase by>=1.5 g/dl and relevant reduction in RBC transfusions by 4 RBC transfusions/8week. HI-P response (pre-treatment<100*109/l):absolute increase of >=30*10^9/l for participants starting with>20*10^9/l and increase from <20*10^9/l to>20*10^9/l and by at least 100%. HI-N response (pre-treatment<1.0*10^9/l): at least 100% increase and an absolute increase >0.5*10^9/l. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, each Cycle of 28 days and End of treatment (30-42 days after Cycle 8 or early withdrawal)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 1: HI-ECycle 1: HI-PCycle 1: HI-NCycle 2: HI-ECycle 2: HI-PCycle 2: HI-NCycle 3: HI-ECycle 3: HI-PCycle 3: HI-NCycle 4: HI-ECycle 4: HI-PCycle 4: HI-NCycle 5: HI-ECycle 5: HI-PCycle 5: HI-NCycle 6: HI-ECycle 6: HI-PCycle 6: HI-NCycle 7: HI-ECycle 7: HI-PCycle 7: HI-NCycle 8: HI-ECycle 8: HI-PCycle 8: HI-NEnd of treatment: HI-EEnd of treatment: HI-PEnd of treatment: HI-N
Decitabine5.98.82.917.227.66.928.639.317.937.033.37.440.940.913.652.461.919.147.152.95.943.856.312.527.634.56.9

[back to top]

Quality of Life Assessment

The quality of life was assessed by the questionnaire QLQ C-30 designed by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. Most questions used 4-point scale (1=Not at All' to 4=Very Much') and 2 questions: Q29 on overall health and Q30 on overall quality of life uses 7-point scale ranging from 1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent. Higher score indicates better quality of life. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1 and Cycle 8 (each cycle of 28 days)

InterventionUnit on a scale (Mean)
Baseline, Q29Baseline, Q30End of treatment, Q29End of treatment, Q30
Decitabine4.44.94.34.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Cytogenetic Response

Cytogenetic responses was assessed as per IWG 2006 criteria which define complete response as disappearance of the chromosomal abnormality without appearance of new ones and partial response as at least 50 percent reduction of the chromosomal abnormality. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 2, 4, 6, 8; each Cycle of 28 days and End of treatment (30-42 days after Cycle 8 or early withdrawal)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Cycle 2, Complete Response (n=18)Cycle 2, Partial Response (n=18)Cycle 4, Complete Response (n=20)Cycle 4, Partial Response (n=20)Cycle 6, Complete Response (n=11)Cycle 6, Partial Response (n=11)Cycle 8, Complete Response (n=6)Cycle 8, Partial Response (n=6)End of treatment, Complete Response (n=17)End of treatment, Partial Response (n=17)
Decitabine22.20.020.025.018.227.30.00.011.85.9

[back to top]

Number of Events Which Led to Hospitalization

The events (reasons) for hospitalizations such as infection, transfusion, acute choleycystitis, allergic transfusion reaction, dyspnoea with right pleural effusion, febrile neutropenia, fever, for decitabine, Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) hematuria, paronychia, pneumonia, heart failure, peri-anal abscess (PAA), pancytopenia,fluctuated neutropenia fever, right dorsal foot cellulitis, Right lower (Rt.Lw) lung pneumonia with impending respiratory (resp) failure, Serious adverse event (SAE)+schedule hospitalization for decitabine, septic shock and not available were reported. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: Start of treatment until disease progression or death or up to Cycle 8, each cycle of 28 days

InterventionEvents (Number)
InfectionTransfusionAcute choleycystitisAllergic transfusion reactionDyspnoea with right pleural effusionFebrile neutropeniaFeverFor DecitabineMDS hematuriaParonychia, pneumonia, heart failurePAA,pancytopenia,fluctuated neutropenia feverRight dorsal foot cellulitisRt Lw lung pneumonia with impending resp. failureSAE+Schedule hospitalization for DecitabineSeptic shockNot available
Decitabine10411416433211114136

[back to top]

Duration for Hospitalization

Duration of hospitalization was calculated for each participant, using the sum of all hospital days by subtracting the date of discharge from the date of admission. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 up to Cycle 8, each cycle of 28 days.

InterventionDays (Mean)
Cycle 1 (n=37)Cycle 2 (n=30)Cycle 3 (n=28)Cycle 4 (n=28)Cycle 5 (n=22)Cycle 6 (n=21)Cycle 7 (n=17)Cycle 8 (n=16)
Decitabine9.015.413.327.122.57.533.35.0

[back to top]

Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression or Death

Time to AML is defined as greater than 30 percent of blasts in bone marrow or the time to death was calculated from the date of treatment start until disease progression to AML or until death, which ever occurred first. Participants who were still alive and did not progress to AML were censored at the moment of last visit. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: Start of treatment until disease progression or death (whichever occur first) or up to 736 days

InterventionMonths (Median)
Decitabine22.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Independency

Transfusion independent participants were calculated from all the participants who required transfusion in the duration of 8 weeks before first dose until disease progression or death or up to 736 days. Transfusion independence was defined as lack of requirement for transfusions for at least 8 weeks. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: 8 weeks before first dose and 736 days of treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine27

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Dependency

Transfusion requirements for both red blood cells as well as platelets were recorded for each participant. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: 8 weeks before first dose until disease progression or death (whichever occur first) or up to 736 days

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine100

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Response

Percentage of participants with response: complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria was evaluated. CR in bone marrow is defined as<=to 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines and persistent dysplasia was noted in peripheral blood hemoglobin >=11 gram (g) per deciliter (dl), platelets >=100*10^9 liter (l), neutrophils >=1.0*10^9 l, Blasts 0%. Partial response is defined as all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except: bone marrow blasts decreased by >=50% over pre-treatment but still >=5%. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 2, 4, 6, 8; each Cycle of 28 days and End of treatment (30-42 days after Cycle 8 or early withdrawal)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Decitabine23.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of treatment start until death (whatever the cause). It was calculated from Kaplan-Meier estimates. Participants still alive were censored at the moment of last visit or contact. (NCT00744757)
Timeframe: Start of treatment until disease progression or death (whichever occur first) or up to 736 days

InterventionMonths (Median)
Decitabine22.8

[back to top]

The Number of Subjects With Adverse Events

Generate safety information when patients were also taking concomitant medications and/or therapies without trial restrictions when decitabine was administered at a dose of 20 milligrams per meter squared (mg/m^2) over a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks in patients with MDS (< 30% blasts) or AML (> 30% blasts). (NCT00760084)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decitabine10

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS): Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause. (NCT00778375)
Timeframe: Evaluated from treatment date until date of death, followed for 5 years/60 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Overall SurvivalOverall Survival among Responders ((n=86)
Clofarabine + Cytarabine + Decitabine11.121.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Remission [Complete Response (CR), Complete Response With Platelet Recover (CRp) or Complete Response With Incomplete Marrow Recovery (CRi)]

All responses were defined as per IWG criteria (2003) where CR Rate defined as number of participants with CR out of total treated participants. Complete remission (CR): Disappearance of all clinical and/or radiologic evidence of disease. Neutrophil count > 1.0 times 10^9/L and platelet count > 100 times 10^9/L, and normal bone marrow differential (< 5% blasts). Complete response with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), defined as CR above, but without normal blood counts. Bone marrow aspirate and/or biopsy starting on day 21 (+/- 7 days) of therapy. (NCT00778375)
Timeframe: Beginning assessment following two 10-day induction cycles through an additional re-induction cycle, up to 40 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
CRCRp/CRi
Induction Clofarabine + Cytarabine + Decitabine609
Re-Induction124

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (CR, CRp/CRi and PR)

IWG Response criteria (2003): Complete remission (CR): Disappearance of all clinical and/or radiologic evidence of disease. Neutrophil count > 1.0 times 10^9/L and platelet count > 100 times 10^9/L, and normal bone marrow differential (< 5% blasts). Complete Remission without Platelet Recovery (CRp): Peripheral blood and bone marrow results as for CR, but with platelet counts of < 100 x 10^9/L or Complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), defined as CR above, but without normal blood counts; Partial Remission (PR): Blood count recovery as for CR, but with both a decrease in marrow blasts of at least 50% and not more than 6 to 25% abnormal cells in the marrow. Participants not achieving a complete remission following first induction course, can receive a second induction course at least 28 days following first to optimize response if possible. (NCT00778375)
Timeframe: Beginning assessment following two 10-day induction cycles through an additional re-induction cycle, up to 40 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Clofarabine + Cytarabine + Decitabine73

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS)

EFS is defined as length of time after primary treatment for a cancer ends that the participant remains free of certain complications or events that the treatment was intended to prevent or delay, for example but not exclusive of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities, cumulative toxicities with consolidation courses, or emergence of resistance to the chemotherapy component of treatment. (NCT00778375)
Timeframe: Follow up up to 5 years/60 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Clofarabine + Cytarabine + Decitabine7.7

[back to top]

Disease-free (DFS) or Relapse-free Survival (RFS) Time

Disease (DFS) or Relapse-free survival (RFS): Time from date of treatment start until the date of first objective documentation of disease-relapse; Bone marrow aspirate and/or biopsy starting on day 21 (+/- 7 days) of therapy and then every 2 weeks (+/- 7 days) as required by leukemia evolution until remission or non-response. Among participants who achieved CR or CRp, RFS was defined as the time interval between the date of response (ie CR or CRp) and the date of relapse or date of death, whichever occurs first. CR or CRp participants who were alive and relapse-free were censored at the off-study date. Full range reflects time to disease progression only, therefore does not reflect a lesser survival time due to other reasons than disease progression/relapse. (NCT00778375)
Timeframe: Evaluated from treatment date until date of disease progression/relapse, followed for 5 years/60 months.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Clofarabine + Cytarabine + Decitabine15.9

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate for First 60 Participants

All responses were defined as per IWG criteria (2003) where CR Rate defined as number of participants with CR out of total treated participants. Complete remission (CR): Disappearance of all clinical and/or radiologic evidence of disease. Neutrophil count > 1.0 times 10^9/L and platelet count > 100 times 10^9/L, and normal bone marrow differential (< 5% blasts). Bone marrow aspirate and/or biopsy starting on day 21 (+/- 7 days) of therapy. (NCT00778375)
Timeframe: Evaluation following two 10 day cycles on day 21 of therapy, continuing up to 210 days

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Clofarabine + Cytarabine + Decitabine58

[back to top]

Phase I and II: Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events

(NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years after the last participant enrolled

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Phase I: 15 mg/m23
Phase I: 20 mg/m26
Phase II: 20 mg/m234

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Decitabine (Cmax)

(NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Before dosing (Pre-dose), 30 min, 60 min (end of infusion), 65 min, 75 min, 90 min, 120 min, 180 min, 240 min after the start of decitabine infusion on Day 1 and Day 5 of 28-Days Cycle 1

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 5
Phase I: 15 mg/m2151.7142.0
Phase I: 20 mg/m2166.4190.6

[back to top]

Phase II: Median Time to Remission

Median time required for the participants to achieve remission (complete remission+partial remission). (NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years after the last participant enrolled

InterventionDays (Median)
Phase II: 20 mg/m2130.0

[back to top]

Phase I: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC)

Area under the curve from time zero to extrapolated infinite time (AUC Infinity) and area under the curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC Last). (NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Before dosing (Pre-dose), 30 min, 60 min (end of infusion), 65 min, 75 min, 90 min, 120 min, 180 min, 240 min after the start of decitabine infusion on Day 1 and Day 5 of 28-Days Cycle 1

,
Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
AUC Last - Day 1AUC Last - Day 5AUC Infinity - Day 1AUC Infinity - Day 5
Phase I: 15 mg/m2149.0136.0150.0136.9
Phase I: 20 mg/m2155.2152.0156.1151.2

[back to top]

Phase II: Median Time to Improvement

Median time required for the participants to achieve overall improvement (complete remission+partial remission+hematologic improvement) (NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years after the last participant enrolled

InterventionDays (Median)
Phase II: 20 mg/m226.5

[back to top]

Phase II: Median Duration of Remission

Median time duration for which participants achieved remission (complete remission+partial remission). (NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years after the last participant enrolled

InterventionDays (Median)
Phase II: 20 mg/m2489

[back to top]

Phase II: Median Duration of Overall Improvement

Median time duration for which participants achieved overall improvement (complete remission+partial remission+hematologic improvement). (NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years after the last participant enrolled

InterventionDays (Median)
Phase II: 20 mg/m2532

[back to top]

Phase II: Overall Remission Rate (ORR): Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR)+Partial Remission (PR) - as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria (2000)

IWG response criteria (2000) - CR: bone marrow evaluations show < 5% blasts; no dysplasia; normal maturation of all cell lines and peripheral blood shows hemoglobin ≥ 11 g/dL; neutrophils ≥ 1,500/mL; platelets ≥ 100,000/mL; 0% blasts; no dysplasia and PR: same as CR, except blasts decrease by ≥ 50% or lower French-American-British (FAB) classification of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. (NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Up to 1 years after the last participant enrolled

InterventionParticipants (Number)
CRPR
Phase II: 20 mg/m272

[back to top]

Phase II: Overall Improvement Rate: Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR)+Partial Response (PR)+Hematological Improvement (HI) - as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria (2000)

IWG response criteria (2000) - CR: bone marrow evaluations (mCR) show < 5% blasts; no dysplasia; normal maturation of all cell lines and peripheral blood shows hemoglobin ≥ 11 g/dL; neutrophils ≥ 1,500/mL; platelets ≥ 100,000/mL; 0% blasts; no dysplasia and PR: same as CR, except blasts decrease by ≥ 50% or lower French-American-British (FAB) classification of Myelodysplastic Syndromes. HI: hemoglobin < 11 g/dL (erythroid); platelet < 100,000/mL; neutrophils < 1,000/mL. (NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years after the last participant enrolled

InterventionParticipants (Number)
CRPRHI
Phase II: 20 mg/m2725

[back to top]

Phase II: Number of Participants With Cytogenic Response - as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2000 (Major/Minor) and IWG 2006 (Complete/Partial)

IWG 2000 - Major: disappearance of cytogenetic abnormality; Minor: 50% or more reduction in abnormal metaphases. IWG 2006 - Complete: disappearance of the chromosomal abnormality without appearance of new ones; Partial: At least 50% reduction of the chromosomal abnormality. (NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years after the last participant enrolled

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Major/CompleteMinor/PartialNo responseNot estimable
Phase II: 20 mg/m261103

[back to top]

Phase I: Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR)+Partial Remission (PR)+Hematological Improvement (HI) - as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria (2000)

IWG response criteria (2000) - CR: bone marrow evaluations (mCR) show < 5% blasts; no dysplasia; normal maturation of all cell lines and peripheral blood shows hemoglobin ≥ 11 g/dL; neutrophils ≥ 1,500/mL; platelets ≥ 100,000/mL; 0% blasts; no dysplasia; PR: same as CR, except blasts decrease by ≥ 50% or lower French-American-British (FAB) classification of Myelodysplastic Syndromes; HI: hemoglobin < 11 g/dL (erythroid); platelet < 100,000/mL; neutrophils < 1,000/mL. (NCT00796003)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days of treatment Cycle 1

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
PRHI
Phase I: 15 mg/m211
Phase I: 20 mg/m212

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Complete Response

Complete Response (CR) was defined as normalization of peripheral blood and bone marrow with /= 1 * 10^9 /l, and a platelet count of >/= 100 & 10^9 /l. Approximately Day 14 of the first cycle of 4 - 8 week cycle, a bone marrow aspirate was performed to check the status of the disease using International Working Group (IWG) criteria for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelofibrosis (MF). (NCT00882102)
Timeframe: Day 14 of first cycle

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Decitabine + Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin10

[back to top]

Response to Treatment

Response includes both complete remission (defined as <5% leukemic blasts in the bone marrow) and partial remission (defined as a greater than 35% reduction in the bone marrow leukemia blast percentage at day 33) (NCT00882206)
Timeframe: Day 33

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decitabine / Vorinostat6

[back to top]

Level of Methylation

the percentage of methylated DNA (NCT00882206)
Timeframe: Day 5

Interventionpercentage of DNA (Mean)
Decitabine / Vorinostat79.82

[back to top]

Level of Methylation

the percentage of methylated DNA (NCT00882206)
Timeframe: Day 0

Interventionpercentage of DNA (Mean)
Decitabine / Vorinostat84.98

[back to top]

Level of Methylation

the percentage of methylated DNA (NCT00882206)
Timeframe: Day 33

Interventionpercentage of DNA (Mean)
Decitabine / Vorinostat86.1

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS) at 1 Year

Percentage of participants with event free survival at 1 year. Event free survival (EFS) where event is defined as either death or transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (marrow and/or blood blasts >/= 20%) (NCT00903760)
Timeframe: Assessed at 12 months/1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Clofarabine26
Decitabine65

[back to top]

Participant Response

Responses: Complete Remission (CR): Normalization peripheral blood & bone marrow /= 1.0 x 10^9/L, & platelet>/= 100 x 10^9/L. Partial Remission: all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except marrow blasts decrease =/> 50% compared to pretreatment or a less-advanced MDS disease classification than prior to treatment. Hematologic Improvement: Response maintained 8+ weeks: Hemoglobin (pretreatment < 11 g/dL): improves 1.5 g/dL or reduced by 4 units of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in 8 weeks compared with pretreatment transfusions in 8 weeks; or Platelet (pretreatment < 100 x 10^9/L): absolute increase >/= 30 x 10^9/L, starting platelet > 20 x 10^9/L OR increase < 20 x 10^9/L to > 20 x 10^9/L and =/> 100%. Neutrophil (pretreatment < 1 x 10^9/L): increase 100% & absolute increase > 0.5 x 10^9/L. (NCT00903760)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Remission (CR)Partial Remission (PR)Hematologic Improvement (HI)
Decitabine904
Decitabine + Clofarabine805

[back to top]

Phase 2 -Number of Patients With a Decrease in Tumor Size Using RECIST and CHOI's Criteria

"Tumor response rate was assessed using RECIST criteria in which a complete response was the disappearance of all target lesions; Partial response was a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimension (LD) of target lesions, relative to baseline measurement; Progressive disease was an increase of 20% or more in the sum of the LD of target lesions; and Stable disease was a decrease in tumor size of less than 30% or increase of less than 20%.~Tumor response rate was also assessed using CHOI's criteria in which a response was a 10% decrease in tumor size or a 15% decrease in tumor density on contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan.~Tumor response rates were assessed in order to determine effectiveness of the treatment regimen which was defined by the response rate of at least 30% as measured by either the RECIST or Choi's criteria, and ineffective if the rate is less than 15% on both." (NCT00925132)
Timeframe: 12 weeks (2 cycles)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Progressive Disease (PD)Stable Disease (SD)
Phase II:Decitabine 0.2 mg/kg +Panobinostat 30mg +Temozolomide125

[back to top]

Phase I - Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at a Given Dose Level

"A DLT was any Grade 4 toxicity for neutrophils or platelets for ≥ 7 days, Grade 3 toxicity for neutrophils for ≥ 21 days, any Grade 3 solid organ toxicity not explainable by another cause (e.g. neurotoxicity, GI toxicity), metabolic/laboratory toxicity (≥10 x ULN AST) for ≥ 14 days, any Grade 4 infection or QTcF> 500msec EKG. DLTs were assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0.~All adverse events were collected and graded to determine DLTs as assessed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. DLTs were assessed to determine the recommended Decitabine and Panobinostat dose for the Phase II portion of the trial." (NCT00925132)
Timeframe: 6 weeks (one full cycle)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1: Experienced DLTCohort 2: Experienced DLTCohort 3: Experienced DLTCohort 4: Experienced DLT
Phase I Dose Escalation0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR)

Complete Response (CR) was defined as normalization of peripheral blood and bone marrow with /= 1 * 10^9 /l, and a platelet count of >/= 100 & 10^9 /l. Evaluation after each treatment course (5-6 weeks) up to 6 cycles. (NCT00968071)
Timeframe: Up to 36 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Decitabine Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin3

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR), Defined as Proportion of Patients Having Complete Response (CR) and Marrow Complete Response (mCR) After Completion of 3 Cycles of Study Drug.

"Based on Modified International Working Group Response Criteria for Altering Natural History of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.~Complete Response: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines. Persistent dysplasia will be noted. Peripheral blood Hgb ≥ 11 g/dL; Platelets ≥ 100 X 10^9/L; Neutrophils ≥ 1.0 X 10^9/Lb; Blasts 0%.~Marrow Complete Response: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥ 50% over pretreatment. Peripheral blood: if hematological improvement responses, they will be noted in addition to marrow CR." (NCT01011283)
Timeframe: 13 Weeks

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Overall Response RateComplete ResponseMarrow Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable Disease
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2000025.0
Decitabine 20 mg/m^2000045.5

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR), Defined as Proportion of Patients Having Complete Response (CR) and Marrow Complete Response (mCR) After Completion of 6 Cycles of Study Drug.

"Based on Modified International Working Group Response Criteria for Altering Natural History of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.~Complete Response: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines. Persistent dysplasia will be noted. Peripheral blood Hgb ≥ 11 g/dL; Platelets ≥ 100 X 10^9/L; Neutrophils ≥ 1.0 X 10^9/Lb; Blasts 0%.~Marrow Complete Response: Bone marrow: ≤ 5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥ 50% over pretreatment. Peripheral blood: if hematological improvement responses, they will be noted in addition to marrow CR." (NCT01011283)
Timeframe: 36 Weeks

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Overall Response RateComplete ResponseMarrow Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable Disease
Azacitidine 75 mg/m^28.38.30016.7
Decitabine 20 mg/m^29.19.109.136.4

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Experience > Grade 2 Non-hematologic Toxicity by National Cancer Institute (NCI)/Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) v4 Criteria

Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) will be presented in tables that include causality, seriousness, severity/grade, and whether the AE resulted in death or discontinuation of treatment, Laboratory data will be summarized in tables that show changes from pre-treatment values and frequencies of abnormal values. Descriptive statistics will also be provided. (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: up to 12 months of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg16

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Bone Marrow Evidence of Terminal Differentiation Response to Therapy.

Number of participants who, after therapy, had more of the differentiated types of blood (red cells, platelets, and white cells) compared to abnormal bone marrow cells than before therapy (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg11

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Particular Genetic Abnormalities Detected by Whole Exome Sequencing Correlation With Clinical Response

Proportion of patients with particular genetic abnormalities, including DNA Methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) depletion, detected by whole exome sequencing correlation with clinical response (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg4

[back to top]

Cytogenetic Response as Per IWG Criteria

Described as the number of patients with a major cytogenetic response (refers to disappearance of a cytogenetic abnormality) or a minor cytogenetic response (50% or more reduction of abnormal metaphases). (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: at 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
complete cytogenetic remissionpartial cytogenetic remissionno cytogenetic remission
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg524

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Response as Defined by IWG (International Working Group) Criteria for Myelodysplasia

Complete Response (CR) include less than 5% marrow blasts without evidence of dysplasia and normalization of peripheral blood counts, including a hemoglobin level of 110 g/L or more, a neutrophil count of 1.5 × 109/L or more, and a platelet count of 100 × 109/L or more. For PR, patients must demonstrate all CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except that marrow blasts should decrease by 50% or more compared with pretreatment levels, or patients may demonstrate a less-advanced MDS disease category than prior to treatment. Stable disease (SD) is defined by failure to achieve at least a partial response but no evidence of progression. Disease progression (DP) includes at least 50% decrease from maximum remission in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in hemoglobin by greater than or equal to 2g/dL, or transfusion dependence. Hematologic improvement (HI) includes hemoglobin increase by at least 1.5g/dL, reduction in transfusions, increase of platelets, increase of neutrophil count (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: Formal assessment at week 12 for study primary end-point (hematologic improvement).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Hematologic ImprovementComplete RemissionPartial RemissionStable DiseaseDisease Progression
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg74095

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Bone Marrow Evidence of Cytotoxicity.

Cytotoxicity is the ability to destroy cells. This will be measured by taking bone marrow samples and measuring the damage to cells. The level of cell destruction will be correlated with clinical response criteria. (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete cytogenetic remissionPartial cytogenetic remission
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg52

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Pharmacodynamic Evidence of Drug Effect.

Evidence of pharmacodynamic effect will be correlated with clinical response criteria. The pharmacodynamic effect of treatment is defined as the number of participants that had depletion DNMT1 with minimal DNA damage and cytotoxicity. (NCT01165996)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I: Decitabine 0.2mg/kg25

[back to top]

Time to CR

Disease response measurements were based on bone marrow evaluations (biopsies, aspirates, or both) performed by local pathology laboratories an assessed by study investigators. CR: requires that the participant achieved a morphologic leukemia-free state and had an ANC >1000/mcL and platelets >100,000/mcL. Hemoglobin concentration or hematocrit had no bearing on remission status, although the participant had to be independent of transfusions. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe time to CR. (NCT01177540)
Timeframe: Randomization to Day 50

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment A: Decitabine + Induction Chemotherapy43.0
Treatment B: Induction Chemotherapy Only37.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Complete Remission (CR)

Disease response measurements were based on bone marrow evaluations (biopsies, aspirates, or both) performed by local pathology laboratories and assessed by study investigators. A designation of CR required that the participant achieve a morphologic leukemia-free state and have an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than 1000 per microliter (/mcL) and a platelet count greater than 100,000/mcL. (NCT01177540)
Timeframe: Day 50

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment A: Decitabine + Induction Chemotherapy27.3
Treatment B: Induction Chemotherapy Only50.0

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil Recovery

Blood sampling was used to determine recovery, and is defined as less than or equal to 1000 per cubic millimeter (/mm^3) for absolute neutrophil count (ANC). Summarized using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimators. (NCT01177540)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 50

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment A: Decitabine + Induction Chemotherapy26.0
Treatment B: Induction Chemotherapy Only18.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) at Baseline and Day 50

After induction chemotherapy, based on bone marrow biopsies. No formal statistical analyses of MRD were performed for this study. (NCT01177540)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 50

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At BaselineAt Day 50
Treatment A: Decitabine + Induction Chemotherapy7525
Treatment B: Induction Chemotherapy OnlyNA11

[back to top]

Leukemia-free Survival (LFS)

LFS was defined as time from CR until the recurrence of leukemia (greater than or equal to [>=] 5% bone marrow blasts, reappearance of peripheral blasts or the appearance of new dysplastic changes, or death, whichever occurred first). For participants who did not achieve a CR, LFS is set to zero days. For participants with CR who do not have leukemic recurrence or death, data for LFS was censored on the date of the last follow-up bone marrow or hematology examination, whichever is later. LFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01177540)
Timeframe: Baseline to recurrence of Leukemia or Death (up to 2 years 5 months)

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment A: Decitabine + Induction ChemotherapyNA
Treatment B: Induction Chemotherapy OnlyNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of death from any cause. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT01177540)
Timeframe: Baseline to Date of Death (up to 2 years 5 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment A: Decitabine + Induction ChemotherapyNA
Treatment B: Induction Chemotherapy OnlyNA

[back to top]

Time to Platelet Recovery

Blood sampling was used to determine recovery and is defined as less than or equal to 100,000/mm^3 for platelet count. Summarized using Kaplan-Meier product limit estimators. (NCT01177540)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 38

Interventiondays (Median)
Treatment A: Decitabine + Induction Chemotherapy22.0
Treatment B: Induction Chemotherapy Only14.5

[back to top]

Response Rate of Azacitidine, and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)

Per Response Evaluation Criteria in solid Tumors Criteria (RECISTv1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Partial Response (PR), >= 30%decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither PD nor PR, the sum of the longest diameters no change or increase by <20% from baseline or from nadir (smallest sum on treatment); Progressive Disease (PD), the sum of the longest diameters increases by>= 20% from nadir (smallest sum on treatment). For non-target lesions assessed by CT or MRI: Stable Disease (SD), Persistence of >=1 non-target lesion; Progressive Disease (PD), Enlargement of non-target lesions and/or appearance of new lesions. (NCT01193517)
Timeframe: After 9 weeks (three, 21 day cycles)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NA (Early Progression)PD (Progression Disease)SD (Stable Disease)
Phase I: Highest Dose Level066
Phase I: Starting Dose111
Phase II0110

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Azacitidine, and Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)

Dose just below the one at which ≥ 1/3 of subjects experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) considered the MTD. (NCT01193517)
Timeframe: Up to 3 weeks from the first dose

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
AzacitidineOxaliplatinCapecitabine
Azacitidine+CAPOX (Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin)751101500

[back to top]

1-year Survival

One-year survival is the percentage of patients who are alive at 1-year measured from the date of randomization. (NCT01303796)
Timeframe: Percentage of patients alive at 1 year after randomization (participants were assessed up to 43 months for overall survival curve estimation but this measure presents the 1 year survival rate percentage).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sapacitabine-decitabine Alternating81
Decitabine83

[back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease (dSD)

Failure to achieve at least hematologic improvement (HI), but no evidence of clinically significant progression for > 16 weeks. (NCT01303796)
Timeframe: up to 43 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sapacitabine-decitabine Alternating23.3
Decitabine14.8

[back to top]

Duration of Partial Remission (dPR)

"Duration of normalization of peripheral neutrophils to >=1000 /microliter, platelet to >=100,000/microliter within 2 weeks of bone marrow biopsy/aspirate, >=50% decrease in bone marrow blasts over pre-treatment but still >5%; independent of transfusions*~*independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response" (NCT01303796)
Timeframe: up to 43 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sapacitabine-decitabine Alternating2.2
Decitabine1.9

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission With Incomplete Platelet Count Recovery (dCRp)

"Duration of normalization of bone marrow to <=5% blasts; peripheral neutrophils >=1000 /microliter, platelet <=100,000 /microliter within 2 weeks of bone marrow biopsy/aspirate; independent of transfusions*; and no extramedullary leukemia.~*independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response" (NCT01303796)
Timeframe: up to 43 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sapacitabine-decitabine Alternating9.5
Decitabine5.7

[back to top]

Duration of Hematological Improvement (dHI)

"Duration of HI~Erythroid response (HI-E) for patients with pre-treatment hemoglobin < 11 g/dL; Major response: >2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC, transfusion independence* Minor response: 1 to 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC, a 50% decrease in transfusion requirements~Platelet response (HI-P) for pre-treatment platelet count <100,000/mm3; Major response: an absolute increase of platelet count by >=30,000/mm3; stabilization of platelet counts and platelet transfusion independence* Minor response: >=50% increase in platelet count with a net increase > 10,000/mm3 but <30,000/mm3~Neutrophil response (HI-N) for absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,500/mm3 before therapy; Major response: >=100% increase, or an absolute increase of >500/mm3, whichever is greater Minor response: >=100% increase, but absolute increase < 500/mm3~independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response" (NCT01303796)
Timeframe: up to 43 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sapacitabine-decitabine Alternating5.8
Decitabine4.8

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Remission (dCR)

"Durations of normalization of peripheral neutrophils to >=1000 /microliter, platelet to >=100,000/microliter within 2 weeks of bone marrow biopsy/aspirate, and bone marrow to <=5 % blasts; independent of transfusions*; and no extramedullary leukemia.~* independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response" (NCT01303796)
Timeframe: up to 43 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Sapacitabine-decitabine Alternating9.5
Decitabine10.4

[back to top]

Hospitalized Days

In-patient days in hospital. (NCT01303796)
Timeframe: up to 12 months

InterventionDays (Median)
Sapacitabine-decitabine Alternating15
Decitabine14

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The distribution of overall survival was estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier. A log-rank analysis stratified by randomization stratification factors was used to compare overall survival between Arm A (decitabine/sapacitabine) versus Arm C (decitabine). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictive factors for overall survival. (NCT01303796)
Timeframe: up to 43 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Sapacitabine-decitabine Alternating5.9
Decitabine5.7

[back to top]

Blood Products Transfused

Number of units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and/or platelet transfusions administered per 8-week period prior to the first dose of study drug and through the date of treatment discontinuation. (NCT01303796)
Timeframe: up to 43 months

InterventionPint (Median)
Sapacitabine-decitabine Alternating20
Decitabine14

[back to top]

Tmax (Time at Which Cmax First Observed)

3-hour IV infusion, every 8 hours for three consecutive days. Tmax was measured post first dose (Day 1), fourth dose (Day 2), and seventh dose (Day 3). (NCT01378416)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3

Interventionhours (Mean)
Day 1Day 2Day 3
Decitabine2.492.532.29

[back to top]

Safety: The Most Frequently Reported Adverse Events (Regardless of Causality)

Summary of All Adverse Events (AEs) by Maximum Grade Occurring in >= 10% Patients (NCT01378416)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Blood & Lymphatic System DisordersCardiac DisordersEye DisordersGastrointestinal DisordersGeneral Disorders & Administration Site ConditionsInfections and InfestationsInvestigations - Weight decreasedMetabolism and NutritionMusculoskeletal and Connective Tissue DisordersNervous System DisordersPsychiatric DisordersRespiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal DisordersSkin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
Decitabine4221114725685139

[back to top]

Cmax (Maximum Plasma Concentration)

3-hour IV infusion, every 8 hours for three consecutive days. Cmax was measured post first dose (Day 1), fourth dose (Day 2), and seventh dose (Day 3). (NCT01378416)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 2Day 3
Decitabine73.864.877.0

[back to top]

AUC (0-∞) - Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity

3-hour IV infusion, every 8 hours for three consecutive days. AUC (0-∞) was measured post first dose (Day 1), fourth dose (Day 2), and seventh dose (Day 3). (NCT01378416)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, day 3

Interventionng∙hr/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 2Day 3
Decitabine163152158

[back to top]

Average Total Body Clearance (Calculated From Rate and Concentration)

3-hour IV infusion, every 8 hours for three consecutive days. Average Total Body Clearance was measured post first dose (Day 1), fourth dose (Day 2), and seventh dose (Day 3). (NCT01378416)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3

InterventionL/hr/m^2 (Number)
Decitabine129

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS)

Disease free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from CR to relapse or death. Relapse free and surviving patients were censored at the date of last follow-up. The median DFS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Relapse is defined as the reappearance of blood blasts or >= 5% marrow blasts after achieving a CR or CRi. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Decitabine)8.5
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)15.3

[back to top]

Complete Remission Rate (CR and CRi)

Defined as the number of patients who achieve a CR or CRi divided by the total number of evaluable patients. A Complete remission (CR) requires: <5% marrow blast, > 200 nucleated cells, no blasts with auer rods, no extramedullary disease, ANC >1,000/mm^3 and platelets > 100,000/mm^3. A CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) is defined as CR with exception of ANC < 1,000/mm^3 or platelets < 100,000/mm^3. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Decitabine)40
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)38

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Time

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from study entry to death of any cause. Surviving patients were censored at the date of last follow-up. The median OS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Decitabine)9.3
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)8.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from study entry to progression or death. Progression free and surviving patients were censored at the date of last follow-up. The median DFS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Decitabine)7.3
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)8.0

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Adverse Events: Incidence of adverse events, assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Adverse events were collected every cycle during treatment and up to one month after treatment. Adverse events were summarized using summary statistics and frequency tables for each separate cohort. Per protocol, analysis was descriptive in nature. In this section, the number of patients that reported a grade 4 or higher event are summarized. A complete listing of Adverse Events is provided in the Adverse Events section below. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Decitabine)51
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)45

[back to top]

Disease Response Rate After Treatment.

Bone marrow evaluation was performed on Day 35 of study to evaluate treatment response. CR defined as attaining M1 marrow (<5% blasts) with no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease in addition to recovery of peripheral blood counts (ANC >750/uL and platelet count >75,000/uL). CRp was defined as attaining an M1 marrow with no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease in addition to recovery of ANC but insufficient recovery of platelets. CRi was attaining M1 marrow with no evidence of circulating blasts or extramedullary disease but insufficient recovery of ANC with or without sufficient recovery of platelets. PR was defined as no evidence of circulating blasts and achievement of M2 marrow (5-25% blasts) without new sites of disease and with recovery of ANC. SD is for patients who did not meet the criteria for PR, CR, CRp, or CRi. PD is an increase of at least 25% in the absolute number of leukemia cells or development of new sites. (NCT01483690)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
complete response (CR)complete response without platelet recovery (CRp)complete remission with incomplete recovery (CRi)stable disease (SD)patient not evaluable for response
Initial Dose Level01112
Modified Dose Level13347

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT).

To evaluate the side effects of giving decitabine and vorinostat before and during chemotherapy using the standard drugs vincristine, dexamethasone, PEG-asparaginase and mitoxantrone. (NCT01483690)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
# of patients with DLT# of patients without DLT# of patients not evaluable
Initial Dose Level221
Modified Dose Level1125

[back to top]

Ph I Study: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Dasatinib

Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) defined as highest dose at which 0 of 3 or NCT01498445)
Timeframe: End of first 28-day cycle

InterventionMilligrams (Number)
Phase I - Dasatinib 100 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m2NA
Phase I - Dasatinib 100 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m2NA
Phase I - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m2140
Phase I - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m2140

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of Response will be measured from the date the given response is achieved to the date the response is first known to be lost (NCT01498445)
Timeframe: up to seven years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase I - Dasatinib 100 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m236.8
Phase I - Dasatinib 100 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m282
Phase I - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m257.8
Phase I - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m258
Phase II - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m261
Phase II - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m237

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematologic Responses During First 3 Months of Treatment

Number of participants with hematologic response (HR) to therapy during first 3 months of combination dasatinib and decitabine therapy, where HR defined as any hematologic response observed during the first 3 months of treatment. Overall Hematologic Response (OHR) is defined as complete hematologic response (CHR), no evidence of leukemia (NEL) or minor hematologic response (MiHR) (NCT01498445)
Timeframe: 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Dasatinib 100 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m23
Phase I - Dasatinib 100 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m21
Phase I - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m25
Phase I - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m24
Phase II - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m23
Phase II - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m23

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival will be measured from the date treatment is started to the date of death or last follow-up. (NCT01498445)
Timeframe: Up to seven years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase I - Dasatinib 100 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m212.0
Phase I - Dasatinib 100 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m27.0
Phase I - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m257.8
Phase I - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m258.2
Phase II - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 10 mg/m262.0
Phase II - Dasatinib 140 mg + Decitabine 20 mg/m237.5

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold difference compared with baseline are reported here. Statistically significant, >=2-fold baseline difference was only seen for MMP-3 (Matrix metalloproteinase-3) at Induction Cycle 1/Day 3. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin20000

[back to top]

Ratios of mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Ratios of mRNA level to baseline showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Ratios of mRNA levels to baseline statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for MYCN (Neuroblastoma Myc oncogene) at Cycle 1/Day 1. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose); Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionratio (Median)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC (Biomarker, Responder)1.60
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg+LDAC(Biomarker, Non-Responder)0.50

[back to top]

AUCtau of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

Daunorubicinol is the major metabolite of daunorubicin, which has anti-neoplastic activity. AUCtau values of daunorubicin and daunorubicinol are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
DaunorubicinDaunorubicinol
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin499.32152
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin424.92712

[back to top]

AUCtau of Cytarabine and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U, levels of both cytarabine and Ara-U were reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 6 and 24 hours post start of cytarabine infusion on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
CytarabineAra-U
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin107028420
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Cytarabine/DaunorubicinNANA

[back to top]

AUCinf of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 1Cycle 1/Day 2
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Decitabine133.4NA
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Decitabine251.5NA

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U. Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) levels of both LDAC and Ara-U were reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
LDAC Cycle 1/Day 2LDAC Cycle 1/Day 10Ara-U Cycle 1/Day 2Ara-U Cycle 1/Day 10
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC62.5565.5620362283
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + LDAC87.49134.830503528

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) of LDAC in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
LDAC Cycle 1/Day 2LDAC Cycle 1/Day 10
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC71.1092.28
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + LDAC89.35143.9

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 to Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 10Cycle 1/Day 21
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC1502016660
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + LDAC2860031400

[back to top]

Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10

InterventionHours (Median)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC1.67

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 1

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected value showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline is reported here. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC483.00

[back to top]

Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Induction Cycle 1/Day 3Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin674.21135
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin16222371

[back to top]

AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC17210

[back to top]

Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response in Arm C are reported. Baseline levels statistically associated with best overall response was only seen in SDF-1 (stromal cell-derived factor 1) in glasdegib+cytarabine/daunorubicin arm. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose for Glasdegib + LDAC and Glasdegib + Decitabine Arms; Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose for Glasdegib +Cytarabine/Daunorubicin Arm)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Dauno (Biomarker, Responder)2275.00
Phase 1B: Glasdegib+Cytarabine/Dauno(Biomarker,Non-Responder)3275.00

[back to top]

Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Responder)323.00
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Non-Responder)362.00

[back to top]

Baseline mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Baseline mRNA level showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Baseline mRNA levels statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for CCND2 (G1/S-Specific Cyclin D2). (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)

InterventionNormalized expression units (Median)
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Responder)10.9
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Non-Responder)14.80

[back to top]

Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 2 Unfit on Cycle 1/Day 10

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hour post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC1252

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at Phase 1B

A DLT was any of the following adverse events (AEs) in Cycle 1 and considered by the investigator possibly related to glasdegib in combination with chemotherapy: (1) Grade >= 3 non-hematologic toxicity, excluding Grade >= 3 infection, fever (including febrile neutropenia), infusion related AEs, electrolyte abnormalities and ALT/AST elevation that returned to Grade <= 1 or baseline within 7 days; (2) prolonged myelosuppression that lasted longer than 42 days from the point of detection, defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 500/microliter(mcL) or platelet count < 10 *10^9/L with a normal bone marrow (<5% blasts and no evidence of disease or dysplasia); (3) inability to deliver at least 80% of the planned study doses for all agents in a combination due to non-hematologic toxicities; (4) Delay of >28 days in receiving the next scheduled cycle due to persisting non-hematologic toxicities. Arm A: Glasdegib+LDAC; Arm B: Glasdegib+Decitabine; Arm C: Glasdegib+Cytarabine/Daunorubicin. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Arms A and B: Cycle 1, Day 1 to Day 28; Arm C: Cycle 1, Day -3 to Day 21 or to Day 28 depending on when the next chemotherapy cycle was started

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC0
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + LDAC0
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Decitabine0
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Decitabine0
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin1
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Unfit

OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from time of randomization for each participant. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Randomization to Follow-up (4 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC8.8
Phase 2 Unfit: LDAC Alone4.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Unfit

For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC18.2
Phase 2 Unfit: LDAC Alone2.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR / Complete Response With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi) at Phase 1B

For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines.For AML and MDS participants, complete response with incomplete blood count recovery(CRi)were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts with either platelets or neutrophils not recovered (platelets <100,000/mcL or neutrophils <1000/mcL). (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + LDAC8.7
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Decitabine28.6
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin54.5

[back to top]

Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Post-baseline levels statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for SDF-1 (Stromal cell-derived factor 1) at Induction Cycle 1/Day 3. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Dauno (Biomarker, Responder)2510.00
Phase 1B: Glasdegib+Cytarabine/Dauno(Biomarker,Non-Responder)3260.00

[back to top]

Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Lead-In

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. Post-baseline levels statistically significant associated with best overall response was only seen for MMP-3 (Matrix metalloproteinase-3) at Induction Cycle 1/Lead-in. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Induction Cycle 1/Lead-in, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Dauno (Biomarker, Responder)8.90
Phase 1B: Glasdegib+Cytarabine/Dauno(Biomarker,Non-Responder)10.50

[back to top]

Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Responder)1.20
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Non-Responder)6.60

[back to top]

Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Responder)3.20
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Non-Responder)10.90

[back to top]

Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit - End of Treatment

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analyte for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC (Biomarker, Responder)0.00
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg+LDAC(Biomarker, Non-Responder)9.40

[back to top]

Tmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U, Tmax levels of both LDAC and Ara-U were reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

,
InterventionHours (Median)
LDAC Cycle 1/Day 2LDAC Cycle 1/Day 10Ara-U Cycle 1/Day 2Ara-U Cycle 1/Day 10
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC0.2500.3253.972.00
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + LDAC0.2500.2504.001.99

[back to top]

Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1

,
InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1/Day 10Cycle 2/Day 1
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Decitabine2.001.03
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Decitabine2.05NA

[back to top]

Tmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

,
InterventionHours (Median)
Induction Cycle 1/Day 3Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin5.994.08
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin6.001.04

[back to top]

Tmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

,
InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1/Day 1Cycle 1/Day 2
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Decitabine0.750.58
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Decitabine0.530.53

[back to top]

Tmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

Daunorubicinol is the major metabolite of daunorubicin, which has anti-neoplastic activity. Tmax values of daunorubicin and daunorubicinol are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

,
InterventionHours (Median)
DaunorubicinDaunorubicinol
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin0.5001.00
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin0.4920.642

[back to top]

Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

,
InterventionHours (Median)
Cycle 1/Day 10Cycle 1/Day 21
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC1.751.34
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + LDAC4.004.00

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 10

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant differences compared with baseline are reported here. ITAC (Interferon-inducible T-cell α chemoattractant) level in LDAC alone arm at Cycle 1/Day 10 exhibited non-significant change from baseline but similar trends as in Glasdegib 100 mg+LDAC arm. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Cycle 1/Day 10, Pre-dose

,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
BDNFITAC
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC5007.5
Phase 2 Unfit: LDAC Alone2000.00

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Factor VII(activated blood coagulation factor VII)BDNFMMP-3IL-8ITAC
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin3180007002100028.0014.00

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
IL-1β (Interleukin-1β)IL-6Factor VIIBDNFVEGFMCP-1MMP-3IL-8IL-5ITAC
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin8.5017.0029250030069.00594.001200055.0085.000.00

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
MIP-1βVEGFMCP-1
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin338.00133.00277.00

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 10

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 10, Pre-dose

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
MIP-1βMCP-1MMP-3IL-8ITAC
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin239.50581.001200011.004.10

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 2 Fit - Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 1

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Selected values showing statistically significant difference compared with baseline are reported here. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Consolidation Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
MIP-1β (Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1β)BDNFVEGFIL-8ITAC
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin226.007000232.509.9041.50

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold difference compared with baseline are reported here. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Induction Cycle 1/Day 10, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
IL-8BDNFIL-5VEGFMCP-1ITAC
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin37.0020099.0051.00684.000.00

[back to top]

Serum Levels of Circulating Protein Analytes at Phase 1B - Baseline

Serum levels were determined for 38 circulating proteins. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold difference compared with baseline are reported here. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose)

Interventionpg/mL (Median)
MMP-3 (Matrix metalloproteinase-3)IL-8 (Interleukin-8)BDNF (Brain-derived neurotrophic factor)IL-5 (Interleukin-5)VEGF (Vascular endothelial growth factor)MCP-1 (Monocyte chemotactic protein-1)ITAC:Interferon-inducible T-cell α chemoattractant
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin1020010.712000.0088.00180.50.00

[back to top]

Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Unfit - End of Treatment

Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Only the analytes showing statistically significant change from baseline are reported here. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose); End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

Interventionratio (Median)
CCND2SMOCCND1
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC0.700.400.40

[back to top]

Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Fit - Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Values showing statistically significant, ≥2-fold differences compared with baseline are reported here. CDKN1A: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A; SMO: mRNA encoding the glasdegib target Smoothened; PTCH2: Patched 2; MYCN: Neuroblastoma Myc oncogene. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose); Induction Cycle 1/Day 3, 1 Hour Post dose

Interventionratio (Median)
CDKN1ASMOPTCH2MYCN
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin2.404.800.600.20

[back to top]

Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment

Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Selected values showing statistically significant differences compared with baseline are reported here. CCND2:G1/S-Specific Cyclin D2; MSI2: Musashi RNA Binding Protein 2; PTCH2: Patched 2. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose); End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

Interventionratio (Median)
CCND2MSI2PTCH2
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin0.800.800.70

[back to top]

Ratios of mRNA Levels to Baseline Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Ratios of mRNA level to baseline showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Induction Cycle 1/Day -3 pre-dose); End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

,
Interventionratio (Median)
CCNE1MSI2
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Non-Responder)1.100.50
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Responder)0.600.90

[back to top]

Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit - Cycle 1/Day 1

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Cycle 1/Day 1, 1 Hour Post-dose

,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
Factor VII:activated blood coagulation factor VIIIL-6 (Interleukin-6)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC (Biomarker, Responder)3115000.00
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg+LDAC(Biomarker, Non-Responder)2345006.80

[back to top]

Post-baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Fit - End of Treatment

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. Selected data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first, an average of 1 year)

,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
IL-1βIL-15 (Interleukin-15)
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Non-Responder)6.70600
Phase 2 Fit (Biomarker, Responder)9.70700

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit

For all MDS participants, disease specific efficacy measures included: CRi (bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts with platelets <100,000/mcL or neutrophils <1000/mcL, including confirmed and unconfirmed responses); PR (repeat bone marrow myeloblasts showing decreased by >= 50% decrease but still >5%, peripheral blood showing neutrophils >= 1,000/mcL, platelets >= 100,000/mcL and Hgb>=11g/dL; including confirmed and unconfirmed responses); SD (including confirmed and unconfirmed responses, failure to achieve PR and no evidence of progression for >8 weeks); marrow complete response (mCR) (bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts and decreased by >= 50%), partial cytogenetic response (>=50% reduction of chromosomal abnormality) and complete cytogenetic response (CRc) (disappearance of chromosomal abnormality with no appearance of now ones). (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
mCRPRSDCRiUnconfirmed SDUnconfirmed CRimCR (CRi not included)CRc
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin0.00.00.020.00.00.00.060.0
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC10.00.00.010.010.010.010.010.0
Phase 2 Unfit: LDAC Alone0.00.033.30.00.00.00.00.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease-specific Efficacy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit

AML participants,disease specific efficacy measures included:CRi;Morphologic Leukemia Free State(MLFS)(bone marrow<5%myeloblasts with spicules and no blasts with auer rods,neutrophils<1000/mcL and platelets<100,000/mcL);partial remission(PR)(bone marrow myeloblasts decrease to 5-25&>=50%decrease from start, neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL);PR with incomplete blood count recovery(PRi)(bone marrow myeloblasts decrease to 5-25&>=50%decrease from start,neutrophils<1000/mcL or platelets<100,000/mcL);minor response(MR)(bone marrow myeloblasts decrease to>=25% from start);stable disease(SD)(bone marrow myeloblasts stable+/-25% from screening value);cytogenetic complete response(CRc)(bone marrow<5%myeloblasts, neutrophils>1000/mcL, platelets>100,000/mcL and normal cytogenetics),molecular complete response(CRm)(bone marrow<5%myeloblasts, neutrophils>1000/mcL, platelets>100,000/mcL and molecular-negative). (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
CRiMLFSPRPRiMRSDCRcCRm
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin10.97.81.61.610.96.335.937.5
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC5.12.66.41.36.416.711.516.7
Phase 2 Unfit: LDAC Alone2.60.02.60.010.521.10.02.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Phase 2 Fit

For AML participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <5% myeloblasts,spicules present and no Auer rods, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL and platelets>=100,000/mcL, transfusion independent and no extramedullary disease. For MDS participants:CR were those with repeat bone marrow showing <=5% myeloblasts, peripheral blood showing neutrophils>=1000/mcL, platelets>=100,000/mcL, 0% blast and hemoglobin (Hgb)>= 11 g/dL, normal maturation of all cell lines. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Total participantsParticipants >= 55 years oldParticipants < 55 years old
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin42.036.777.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 2 Fit

OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from each participant's first dose. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: First dose to Follow-up (4 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Total participantsParticipants >= 55 years oldParticipants < 55 years old
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin14.914.7NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs Categorized by Seriousness at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. An serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin6935
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC8468
Phase 2 Unfit: LDAC Alone4132

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs Categorized by Seriousness at Phase 1B

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. An serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: resulted in death; was life threatening (immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin1610
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Decitabine44
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC1713
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin63
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Decitabine32
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + LDAC65

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit (Treatment-related)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. Treatment-related AEs were AEs related to glasdegib and/or backbone chemotherapy. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Grade 1 AEsGrade 2 AEsGrade 3 AEsGrade 4 AEsGrade 5 AEsMissing or unknown AEs
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin04154610
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC49203410
Phase 2 Unfit: LDAC Alone4631010

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit (All Causality)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Grade 1 AEsGrade 2 AEsGrade 3 AEsGrade 4 AEsGrade 5 AEsMissing or unknown AEs
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin01115250
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC241539240
Phase 2 Unfit: LDAC Alone01815170

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AEs at Phase 1B (Treatment-related)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. Treatment-related AEs were AEs related to glasdegib and/or backbone chemotherapy. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Grade 1 AEsGrade 2 AEsGrade 3 AEsGrade 4 AEsGrade 5 AEsMissing or unknown AEs
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin2731000
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Decitabine200400
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + LDAC327630

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) at Phase 1B (All Causality)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. Treatment Emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study medication and occurred within 28 days post last dose. AEs were graded by the investigator according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 : Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 4 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Grade 1 AEsGrade 2 AEsGrade 3 AEsGrade 4 AEsGrade 5 AEsMissing or unknown AEs
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin0381010
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Decitabine101410
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + LDAC1231070

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values Meeting Predefined Criteria at Phase 2 Fit and Unfit

Maximum absolute values and increases from baseline were summarized for QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula). Number of participants with QTcF meeting the following criteria is presented:QTcF interval:<450 msec; QTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec; QTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec; QTcF interval >=500 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: <30 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: 30 to <60 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60 msec. End of treatment in the time frame were defined as: maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 1 year

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
QTcF interval increase < 30 msecQTcF interval increase: 30 to < 60 msecQTcF interval increase >= 60 msecMaximum QTcF interval < 450 msecMaximum QTcF interval: 450 to < 480 msecMaximum QTcF interval: 480 to < 500 msecMaximum QTcF interval >= 500 msec
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin41216461831
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC60194462935
Phase 2 Unfit: LDAC Alone12418432

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Corrected QT Interval Using Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Values Meeting Predefined Criteria at Phase 1B

Maximum absolute values and increases from baseline were summarized for QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula). Number of participants with QTcF meeting the following criteria is presented: QTcF interval:<450 msec; QTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec; QTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec; QTcF interval >=500 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: <30 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline: 30 to <60 msec; QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60 msec. Arms in the time frame description are defined as: Arm A, Glasdegib +LDAC; Arm B, Glasdegib + Decitabine; Arm C, Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin. End of treatment in the time frame were defined as: maximum of 12 cycles from start of therapy or until disease progression or relapse, participant refusal or unacceptable toxicity occurred, whichever came first. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: 1 year

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
QTcF interval increase < 30 msecQTcF interval increase: 30 to < 60 msecQTcF interval increase >= 60 msecMaximum QTcF interval < 450 msecMaximum QTcF interval: 450 to < 480 msecMaximum QTcF interval: 480 to < 500 msecMaximum QTcF interval >= 500 msec
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin1462101011
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Decitabine2324201
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + LDAC1650101100

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 1/Day 21

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 10Cycle 1/Day 21
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC10741242
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + LDAC19422577

[back to top]

Cmax of LDAC and Ara-U in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and LDAC at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

Ara-U is the major metabolite of cytarabine. LDAC (low dose cytarabine) is rapidly degraded to the stable metabolite Ara-U, Cmax levels of both LDAC and Ara-U were reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 2 and Cycle 1/Day 10

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
LDAC Cycle 1/Day 2LDAC Cycle 1/Day 10Ara-U Cycle 1/Day 2Ara-U Cycle 1/Day 10
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC58.5063.01379.5452.2
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + LDAC100.1132.5569.7652.0

[back to top]

Cmax of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 10Cycle 2/Day 1
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Decitabine17181826
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Decitabine2381NA

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at Phase 1B

OS was defined as duration from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median OS. In this method, every participant had a follow-up time which was associated with an indicator, 1=event (death in our case), and 0 =censored. If the participants were not known to have died, time to date of last known to be alive was used as to calculate the follow-up time and indicator was 0 for these participants. KM method estimates the median OS based on the K-M curve. The K-M curve only drops when we had an event and censor data are the ticks in the graph. To estimate median OS, the K-M curve usually will be smoothed first and a line will be drawn at 50%. The median OS is the point when K-M curve and the horizontal hit. Survival status was collected every month for the first 2 months after discontinuation of study treatment and thereafter every 2 months until death or 4 years from each participant's first dose. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: First dose to Follow-up (4 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + LDAC4.4
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Decitabine11.5
Phase 1B: Glasdegib + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin37.8

[back to top]

Cmax of Decitabine in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5 hour from start of infusion, 1 hour (at end of infusion) and 2, 3 and 4 hours from start of infusion on Cycle 1/Day 1 and Cycle 1/Day 2

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 1Cycle 1/Day 2
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Decitabine113.4127.9
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Decitabine174.2121.7

[back to top]

Cmax of Daunorubicin and Daunorubicinol in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

Daunorubicinol is the major metabolite of daunorubicin, which has anti-neoplastic activity. Cmax values of daunorubicin and daunorubicinol are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 4, 6, 24 hours post administration of daunorubicin on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3

,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
DaunorubicinDaunorubicinol
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin275.3195.4
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin341.0233.4

[back to top]

Baseline mRNA Levels Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. Whole blood mRNA analyses were performed on 21 mRNA candidates. Baseline mRNA level showing statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. FOXM1: Forkhead box M1; PTCH1: Patched 1. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose)

,
InterventionNormalized expression units (Median)
FOXM1PTCH1
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC (Biomarker, Responder)0.200.20
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg+LDAC(Biomarker, Non-Responder)0.400.10

[back to top]

Baseline Levels of Serum Circulating Protein Analytes Associated With Best Overall Response at Phase 2 Unfit

Responders were AML participants who achieved CR, CRi, MLFS, PR or PRi based on investigator-reported best overall response and MDS participants who achieved CR, mCR, PR or SD based on investigator-reported best overall response. A total of 38 proteins were analyzed. The data of analytes for which the serum level showed statistically significant correlation with clinical response are reported. (NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Baseline (Cycle 1/Day 1 pre-dose)

,
Interventionpg/mL (Median)
BDNFICAM-1 (Intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1)6CKINEBAFF (B-cell activating factor)MIP-3βEotaxin-1 (C-C motif chemokine 11)
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg + LDAC (Biomarker, Responder)2000128000223.50704.50275.00169.00
Phase 2 Unfit: Glasdegib 100 mg+LDAC(Biomarker, Non-Responder)900161000318.001295.00414.500.00

[back to top]

AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Decitabine at Phase 1B on Cycle 1/Day 10 and Cycle 2/Day 1

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1/Day 10; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 2/Day 1

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1/Day 10Cycle 2/Day 1
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + DecitabineNA17060
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Decitabine28380NA

[back to top]

AUCtau of Glasdegib in Participants Receiving Glasdegib and Cytarabine/Daunorubicin at Phase 1B on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3 and Day 10

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 3; pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 4, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Induction Cycle 1/Day 3Induction Cycle 1/Day 10
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin933216300
Phase 1B: Glasdegib 200 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin2284026370

[back to top]

Pre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of Glasdegib in Phase 2 Fit on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

(NCT01546038)
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 1 and 4 hours post-dose on Induction Cycle 1/Day 10

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Phase 2 Fit: Glasdegib 100 mg + Cytarabine/Daunorubicin308.7

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Became Transfusion Independent

(NCT01593670)
Timeframe: 4-6 Months Post Start of Cycle 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients With High Risk MDS0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Patients alive at 1 year. (NCT01593670)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients With High Risk MDS3

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Had Natural Killer (NK) Cell Expansion

NK cell expansion is defined as the presence of donor NK cells in the recipient at Day 8 post NK cell infusion. (NCT01593670)
Timeframe: After Cycle 2 (approx. 3 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients With High Risk MDS0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3 or Higher Non-hematologic Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs) will be graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE). Non-hematologic adverse events are defined as untoward medical occurrences associated with the use of a study drug whether or not considered study drug related, excluding those events involving white blood cells, neutrophils, red blood cells or platelets. In general, grade 3 AEs are defined as 1) being severe or medically significant but,not immediately life-threatening; 2) requiring hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; 3) disabling; or 4) limiting self care activities. Grade 4 AEs are defined as 1) having life-threatening consequences; or 2) requiring urgent intervention. Grade 5 AEs are defined as causing death related to an adverse event. (NCT01593670)
Timeframe: Day 1 through Month 3

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients With High Risk MDS7

[back to top]

The Number of Patients Who Achieved a Clinical Response

Clinical response includes: Complete Response (less than 5% myeloblasts present in the bone marrow and in the peripheral blood a hemoglobin of at least 11g/dl, platelets of at least 100 X 10E9/L, neutrophils of at least 1.0 X 10E9/L, and blasts 0%); Partial Response (all Complete Response criteria if previously abnormal except bone marrow myeloblasts are decreased by more than 50% over pre-treatment, but still greater than 5%); and hematologic improvement (a hemoglobin increase of greater than 1.5g/dl or decreased red blood cell transfusions by at least 4 per 8 week period, a platelet increase of more than 30 X 10E9/L for patients with a baseline of more than 20 X 10E9/L or an increase by 100% for those with a baseline of less than 20 X 10E9/L, and a neutrophil increase of at least 100% and an absolute increase of greater than 0.5 X 10E9/L. (NCT01593670)
Timeframe: After 2 Courses of Treatment (Approx. 3 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patients With High Risk MDS5

[back to top]

CRiMRD+ Defined as Meeting All Criteria for a CRi But With Evidence of Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)1
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

CRMRD- Defined as Morphologic CR Without Evidence of Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)2
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

CRMRD+ Defined as a Morphologic CR But With Minimal Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry, Cytogenetics, or Other Known Molecular Biomarkers

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

Cytogenetic Response Defined as no Detectable Cytogenetic Abnormality in a Subsequent BM Specimen After Induction or Re-induction

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)3
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

Duration of Moderate Neutropenia Defined as an ANC Less Than 1000

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

Interventiondays (Mean)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)67

[back to top]

Duration of Severe Neutropenia Defined as an ANC Less Than 500

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

Interventiondays (Mean)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)65

[back to top]

Duration of Thrombocytopenia Defined as Platelet Count Less Than 100,000

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

Interventiondays (Mean)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)51

[back to top]

Resistant Disease Defined as Patient Survives at Least 14 Days After Completion of the Last Dose of Induction or Re-induction But Has Persistent Leukemia in Peripheral Blood (PB) or BM

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 90 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)1
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)3

[back to top]

CRi Defined as Meeting All Criteria for a Morphologic CR But ANC Remains Less Than 1,000/μL and/or Platelet Count Less Than 100,000/μL

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

Severe Prolonged Aplasia

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 45 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

TRM With Each Course of Decitabine-priming, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0

[back to top]

Frequency and Severity of Grade 3, 4, and 5 Toxicities With Each Course of Decitabine-priming, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine According to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version (CTCAE) 4.0

(NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Assessed for up to 3 months after completion study treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CYCLE 1 : Infection Grade 3CYCLE 1 : Infection Grade 4CYCLE 1 : Hepatobiliary Grade 3CYCLE 1 : Blood and Lymphatic Grade 3CYCLE 1 : Gastrointenstinal Grade 3CYCLE 2 : Infection Grade 3CYCLE 2 : Infection Grade 4CYCLE 2 : Hepatobiliary Grade 3CYCLE 2 : Blood and Lymphatic Grade 3CYCLE 2 : Gastrointenstinal Grade 3
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)2003000011
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)0111000000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Morphologic CR

Morphologic complete remission (CR): Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC)≥1,000/uL, platelet count ≥100,000/uL, <5% Bone Marrow (BM) blasts, no Auer rods (cytoplasmic inclusions which result from an abnormal fusion of the primary (azurophilic) granules), no morphologic dysplasia, and no evidence of extramedullary disease (NCT01607645)
Timeframe: Participants were monitored up until the point when they went off study following completion of the treatment (3 months)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRCRi-MRD (Minimal Residual Disease)Refractory
Arm I (Decitabine Day -4 to Day 0), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)211
Arm II (Decitabine (Day -9 to Day -5), Idarubicin, Cytarabine)003

[back to top]

Change in Bone Marrow Methylcytosine

-Change of total bone marrow deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylcytosine from baseline to Day 10 (NCT01687400)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 10

,
Interventionproportion of methylcytosine (Mean)
Day 0Day 10
Decitabine (CR/CRi/mCR)0.530.4416
Decitabine (PR/SD/PD)0.53740.4639

[back to top]

Compare Outcomes of a 10-day Decitabine Per Cycle Regimen to a 5-day Regimen (Historical Controls)

The overall response rate (CR/CRi/mCR/PR) and complete response rate (CR/CRi/mCR) will be compared with historical controls. Response assessed according to IWG criteria. (NCT01687400)
Timeframe: 4 months (4 treatment cycles)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall response rate (CR, CRi/mCR/PR)Complete response rate (CR, CRi, mCR)
Decitabine74.4263.95

[back to top]

Peripheral Blood Decitabine Plasma Levels

"To determine whether steady state serum concentrations of decitabine correlated with responses~Complete remission (CR), Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), Partial remission (PR), Stable disease (SD), Progressive disease (PD), Not applicable (NA) - assessed according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria" (NCT01687400)
Timeframe: Day 4

Interventionng/ml (Mean)
CRCRiPRSDPDNA
Decitabine140.5117.267.71145298.599.64

[back to top]

Correlation of Patient Specific Mutations With Overall Response Rate

"-Best response after 4 treatment cycles as assessed according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria; bone marrow for gene sequencing will be collected at baseline; mutations will be correlated with overall response rate~--Complete remission (CR), Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), Marrow complete remission (mCR), Partial remission (PR), Stable disease (SD), Progressive disease (PD)" (NCT01687400)
Timeframe: 4 months (4 treatment cycles)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TP53ASXL1SRSF2IDH2DNMT3ASF3B1RUNX1TET2IDH1NPM1NRASU2AF1MY05BWT1
Decitabine (Participants With Response of CR/CRi/mCR/PR)269768754243435
Decitabine (Participants With Response of SD/PD)32555033313121

[back to top]

Rate of Mutation Clearance During Treatment

Samples collected at baseline and after 10, 28 and 56 days of therapy; the rate of mutation clearance was measured as mean VAF change per day of treatment and was estimated using linear mixed model for repeated measurement data . (NCT01687400)
Timeframe: Up to Day 56

Interventionproportion of variant alleles per day (Mean)
TP53SRSF2DNMT3AIDH2RUNX1TET2ASXL1IDH1NRASSF3B1
Decitabine-0.781-0.2214-0.2122-0.08344-0.2641-0.07478-0.3898-0.11030.04544-0.719

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil Recovery

Defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 500/ul for three consecutive measurements on different days. Will be summarized with mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, and the change will be tested using a one-sample paired t-test at a two-tailed significance level of 0.05. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventiondays (Mean)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant16

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, and OS will be obtained from the KM estimates along with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant64.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Primary Graft Failure

Defined as less than 5% donor chimerism in the cluster of differentiation (CD)3 and CD33 selected cell populations at any time after transplantation. Will be analyzed using KM method. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Remission After Transplantation

(NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant14

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Grade III-IV Acute GVHD

Determined by the standard bone marrow transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network criteria (BMTCTN). Will be analyzed using KM method, a Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD) grade III-IV will be obtained from the KM estimates along with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Day 100

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant27.8

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD According to BMTCTN

Will be summarized with a proportion and a 95% confidence interval. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant40.7

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

(NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant141

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery by Day 30

Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a platelet count greater than 20,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusions. Will be summarized with mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, and the change will be tested using a one-sample paired t-test at a two-tailed significance level of 0.05. (NCT01707004)
Timeframe: Up to day 30

Interventionpercentage with plt engraftment, day 30 (Number)
Decitabine + Bone Marrow Transplant58

[back to top]

Participants With a Response

Overall Response = complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) + marrow CR (mCR) + hematologic improvement (HI). CR is normalization of peripheral blood and bone marrow with <5% bone marrow blasts, a peripheral blood granulocyte count > (1.0 x 10^9/L, and platelet count > 100 x 10^9/L). PR is same as CR except for the presence of 6-15% marrow blasts, or 50% reduction if <15% at start of treatment. Marrow CR is blasts /=50% from baseline. HI is platelets increase by 50% and to above 30 x 10^9/L untransfused (if lower than that pre-therapy; or hemoglobin increase by 2 g/dl; or transfusion independent; or splenomegaly reduction by > 50%; or monocytosis reduction by > 50% if pretreatment > 5 X1 0^9/L. (NCT01720225)
Timeframe: 56 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine49
Azacitidine19

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Became Transfusion Independent

Participants who were transfusion dependent at baseline prior to starting therapy on the Decitabine or Azacitidine arm will be analyzed for transfusion independence. Transfusion independence defined as being transfusion-free for ≥8 consecutive weeks between the first dose and study treatment discontinuation. (NCT01720225)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine12
Azacitidine3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Survival measured as of day of last contact. Categorized according to criteria recommended by International Working Groups. (NCT01729845)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Dose Level 2: 7-Days of Decitabine-MEC564

[back to top]

Remission Rate Including CR and CRp

"Complete remission (CR) and Complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) categorized according to criteria recommended by International Working Groups:~Complete resolution of disease-related symptoms and signs including palpable hepatosplenomegaly; hemoglobin level at least 110 g/L, platelet count at least 100x10^9/L, and absolute neutrophil count at least 1.0 x10^9/L. In addition, all 3 blood counts should be no higher than the upper normal limit; Normal leukocyte differential; Bone marrow histologic remission defined as the presence of age-adjusted normocellularity, no more than 5% myeloblasts, and an osteomyelofibrosis grade no higher than 1." (NCT01729845)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 2: 7-Days of Decitabine-MEC11

[back to top]

Duration of Relapse-free Survival (for Patients Achieving CR or CRp)

Categorized according to criteria recommended by International Working Groups. (NCT01729845)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionDays (Median)
Dose Level 2: 7-Days of Decitabine-MEC150

[back to top]

Most Efficacious and Tolerated Dosage of Decitabine (Period 1)

MTD (most tolerated dose) of decitabine, measured in number of dose limiting toxicities. MTD defined as the highest dose in which the incidence of dose limiting toxicity is < 33%, graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (Phase I) (NCT01729845)
Timeframe: through day 45

,,
InterventionIncidents (Number)
Dose-limiting toxiticiesComplete RemissionComplete Remission, incomplete PLT recoveryComplete Remission, incomplete blood count recoverMorphologic leukemia-free stateResistant DiseaseDeath (among those who received MEC)
Dose Level 1: 5-Days of Decitabine-MEC0120012
Dose Level 2: 7-Days of Decitabine-MEC0511031
Dose Level 3: 10-Days of Decitabine-MEC0320340

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in Scores of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) Physical Functioning Scale

"EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life of cancer patients. It is composed of 30 items, multi-item measure (28 items) and 2 single-item measures. For the multiple item measure, 4-point scale is used and the score for each item range from 1 = not at all to 4 = very much. Higher scores indicate worsening. The 2 single-item measure involves question about the overall health and overall quality of life which will be rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 = very poor to 7 = excellent. Lower scores indicate worsening. Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of physical functioning." (NCT01751867)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of treatment (approximately up to 2 years)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
3-Day Posology-5.5
5-Day Posology-9.1

[back to top]

Mean Percentage of Duration of Hospitalization (Relative to Days on Study Treatment)

Duration of hospitalization was calculated as, total number of days a participant stayed in hospital during study treatment divided by the study treatment duration (NCT01751867)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionPercentage of total days (Mean)
3-Day Posology59.6
5-Day Posology59.2

[back to top]

Cytogenetic Response Rate: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Cytogenetic Response (Complete+Partial) by Status of Clinical Overall Response - International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria

As per IWG 2006 response criteria - Complete cytogenetic response: disappearance of the chromosomal abnormality without appearance of new ones; Partial cytogenetic response: At least 50% reduction of the chromosomal abnormality. Status of Clinical response - complete remission (CR); marrow CR (mCR); partial remission (PR). (NCT01751867)
Timeframe: From the date of first dose until 30 to 42 days after the last dose of the 2 years treatment period, or at time of discontinuation

,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Overall (n=6, 24)CR+mCR+PR (n=3, 13)CR (n=2, 3)mCR (n=1, 10)
3-Day Posology66.7100.0100.0100.0
5-Day Posology66.784.666.790.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate: Percentage of Participants Who Survived During 6 Months and 12 Months of Treatment.

(NCT01751867)
Timeframe: From the date of dosing until death or lost to follow-up for up to 2.5 years after last patient was enrolled

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
6-month survival rate12-month survival rate
3-Day Posology91.175.9
5-Day Posology84.765.9

[back to top]

Transfusion Independence: Number of Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent

A participant was considered to be transfusion independent, if the participant had no transfusions of Red Blood Cells (RBCs) or platelets for 8 consecutive weeks or more. (NCT01751867)
Timeframe: Baseline; up to 2 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Baseline (Before First Dose) (n=34, 98)Treatment Phase (n=34, 97)
3-Day Posology718
5-Day Posology3747

[back to top]

Hematological Improvement Rate: Number of Participants Who Achieved Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR) and Hematologic Improvement (HI) - International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria

IWG 2006 response criteria - CR: bone marrow evaluation shows <= 5% blasts; normal maturation of all cells lines (mCR), peripheral blood evaluation shows hemoglobin >= 11 g/dL, neutrophils >= 1000/mL, platelets >= 100,000/mL, 0% blasts; PR: Same as CR, except blasts decrease by >= 50%, still greater than 5% in bone marrow; HI: hemoglobin increase of >= 1.5 g/dL, platelet increase of >= 30,000/mL (starting with > 20,000/mL), neutrophils increase of >= 100% and > 500/μL. (NCT01751867)
Timeframe: From the date of first dose until 30 to 42 days after the last dose of the 2 years treatment period, or at time of discontinuation

InterventionParticipants (Number)
3-Day Posology16
5-Day Posology47

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR): Number of Participants Who Achieved Either Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) - International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Response Criteria

IWG 2006 response criteria - CR: bone marrow evaluation shows less than or equal to (<=) 5% blasts; normal maturation of all cells lines (mCR), peripheral blood evaluation shows hemoglobin >= 11 gram per deciliter (g/dL), neutrophils >= 1000/mL, platelets >= 100,000/mL, 0% blasts; PR: Same as CR, except blasts decrease by >=50%, still greater than 5% in bone marrow. (NCT01751867)
Timeframe: From the date of first dose until 30 to 42 days after the last dose of the 2 years treatment period, or at time of discontinuation

InterventionParticipants (Number)
3-Day Posology10
5-Day Posology25

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up. (NCT01786343)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Decitabine - 5 Day Regimen5.5
Decitabine - 10 Day Regimen6.0

[back to top]

Participants With a Response

Response is defined as Complete Response (CR) + Partial Remission (PR) + Complete Remission with incomplete recovery (CRi) + Clinical Benefit. CR is the normalization of the peripheral blood and bone marrow with /= (1.0 x 10^9/L, and a platelet count >/= 100 x 10^9/L). PR is the same as CR except for the presence of 6-15% marrow blasts, or 50% reduction if <15% at start of treatment. CRi meets all criteria for CR except for platelet recovery to >100 x 10^9/L and/or granulocyte count > (1.0 x 10^9/L). Clinical benefit is platelets increase by 50% and to above 30 x 10^9/L untransfused (if lower than that pretherapy); or granulocytes increase by 100% and to above 10^9/L (if lower than that pre-therapy); or hemoglobin increase by 2 g/dl; or transfusion independent; or splenomegaly reduction by > 50%; or monocytosis reduction by > 50% if pretreatment > 5 x 109/L. (NCT01786343)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine - 5 Day Regimen12
Decitabine - 10 Day Regimen19

[back to top]

Response Duration

The date of response to date of loss of response or last follow-up. Response is defined as Complete Response (CR) + Partial Remission (PR) + Complete Remission with incomplete recovery (CRi) + Clinical Benefit. CR is the normalization of the peripheral blood and bone marrow with /= (1.0 x 10^9/L, and a platelet count >/= 100 x 10^9/L). PR is the same as CR except for the presence of 6-15% marrow blasts, or 50% reduction if <15% at start of treatment. CRi meets all criteria for CR except for platelet recovery to >100 x 10^9/L and/or granulocyte count > (1.0 x 10^9/L). Clinical benefit is platelets increase by 50% and to above 30 x 10^9/L untransfused (if lower than that pretherapy); or granulocytes increase by 100% and to above 10^9/L (if lower than that pre-therapy); or hemoglobin increase by 2 g/dl; or transfusion independent; or splenomegaly reduction by > 50%; or monocytosis reduction by > 50% if pretreatment (NCT01786343)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Decitabine - 5 Day Regimen9.4
Decitabine - 10 Day Regimen6.4

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Clofarabine

Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) defined as the highest dose schedule in which 6 patients were treated with at most 1 experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Clofarabine 15 mg/m2 IV over approximately 1 hour daily (number of days selected based on Phase I portion). (NCT01794702)
Timeframe: After second, 33 day cycle

Interventionmg/m^2 x 4 days (6-9) (Number)
Period 115

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Response

Primary endpoint is overall response defined as the best response either complete response, complete remission without platelet recovery, or complete remission without incomplete blood count recovery within 56 days. (NCT01794702)
Timeframe: 56 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase II Clofarabine + Cytarabine + Decitabine + Idarubicin20

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up. (NCT01794702)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years after participants off study date

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase II Clofarabine + Cytarabine + Decitabine + Idarubicin7.7

[back to top]

To Determine the Disease-free Survival (DFS).

Time from date of treatment start until the date of first objective documentation of return of disease. (NCT01794702)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years after participants off study date

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II Clofarabine + Cytarabine + Decitabine + Idarubicin17.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in Participants Who Experienced Complete Response or Complete Response With Incomplete Count Recovery

(NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months (median follow-up = 25.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Decitabine + Cytarabine15.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in Participants Who Experienced Complete Response, Complete Response With Incomplete Count Recovery, or Partial Response

(NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months (median follow-up = 25.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Decitabine + Cytarabine15.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

(NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months (median follow-up = 25.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Decitabine + Cytarabine10.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in Participants Who Experienced Complete Response

(NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months (median follow-up = 25.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Decitabine + Cytarabine18.9

[back to top]

Relapse-Free Survival in Participants With Complete Response or Complete Response With Incomplete Count Recovery.

(NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Decitabine + Cytarabine11.7

[back to top]

Relapse-Free Survival in Participants With Complete Response, Complete Response With Incomplete Count Recovery or Partial Response, and Received Maintenance Therapy

(NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Decitabine + Cytarabine + Maintenance Therapy11.5

[back to top]

Demographic Characteristics and Clinical Measures as Potential Predictors of Overall Survival (OS)

Median number of months of survival per individual demographic characteristics and clinical measures. (NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months (median follow-up = 25.4 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Age ≤ 75 yearsAge > 75 yearsSex - FemaleSex - MaleECOG status 0ECOG status 1ECOG status 2Charlson co-morbidity status ≤ 6Charlson co-morbidity status > 6FLT and NPM1 Status: favorableFLT and NPM1 Status: intermediateFLT and NPM1 Status: adverseAML Type-Primary AMLAML Type-AML with MDS changesAML Type-Treatment-related AMLWBC ≤ 5.25 µ/LWBC > 5.25 µ/LHematocrit ≤ 27.9%Hematocrit > 27.9%Platelets ≤ 54.5 µ/LPlatelets > 54.5 µ/LAlbumin ≤ 3.4 gm/dLAlbumin > 3.4 gm/dLCreatinine ≤ 0.97 mg/dLCreatinine > 0.97 mg/dLBilirubin ≤ 0.8 mg/dLBilirubin > 0.8 mg/dLLDH ≤ 233 IU/LLDH > 233 IU/LBone marrow blasts ≤ 53.65%Bone marrow blasts > 53.65%Peripheral blasts ≤ 13%Peripheral blasts > 13%
Decitabine + Cytarabine12.49.711.010.616.012.64.214.37.418.97.614.310.311.512.414.97.613.010.510.415.410.813.610.614.910.413.614.46.914.97.614.07.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants by Best Clinical Response Experienced

The number of participants who experienced either a Complete Response, Complete Response with Incomplete Count Recovery, Partial Response, or Progressive Disease. Complete response: Less than 5% blasts in an aspirate sample of a patient who has an absolute neutrophil count of >1000µ/L and platelets >100,000µ/L; Complete response with incomplete count recovery: Complete response except for residual neutropenia (<1000µ/L) or thrombocytopenia (<100,000µ/L) Partial response: Decrease of at least 50% in the percentage of blasts to 5-25% in the bone marrow aspirate; Progressive disease: Failure to achieve complete response or partial response (NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseComplete Response with Incomplete Count RecoveryPartial ResponseProgressive Disease
Decitabine + Cytarabine20667

[back to top]

Numbers of Patients (Out of 44) Experiencing Adverse Events With CTCAE Grade ≥ 3 or Adverse Events Grade ≥ 4

The number of participants (out of 44) experiencing adverse events, with CTCAE Grade ≥ 3 or Adverse Events Grade ≥ 4 (NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse Events Grade ≥ 3Adverse Events Grade ≥ 4
Decitabine + Cytarabine4441

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Survival to Four and Eight Weeks and One Year

The proportion of all participants experiencing four and eight-week mortality, or, who were alive at one year. (NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to one year (4 weeks, 8 weeks, and one year)

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Death Within 4 WeeksDeath Within 8 WeeksAlive at One Year
Decitabine + Cytarabine0.0230.0910.48

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With Clinical Response (CR)

The number of participants (out of 39) who experienced Clinical Response as Complete Response, or, Complete Response + Complete Response with Incomplete Count Recovery (exact Clopper-Pearson confidence interval). (NCT01829503)
Timeframe: Up to 38 months

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
CompleteComplete + Complete with Incomplete Count Recovery
Decitabine + Cytarabine0.510.67

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate

"The complete remission (CR) rate, or complete response rate, is reported as the sum and proportion of participants that achieved CR or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), within 12 months of starting midostaurin treatment.~Complete remission (CR): Bone marrow blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1000/μL; platelet count > 100,000/μL; independence of red cell transfusions.~CR with incomplete recovery (CRi): All CR criteria except for ANC < 1000/μL or platelet count < 100,000/μL.~Partial remission (PR): All hematologic criteria of CR; except decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to 5% to 25%; and decrease of pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%." (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin8

[back to top]

Median Duration of Response (DoR)

"Response was assessed by evaluations conducted every 3 cycles (12 weeks). Once documented as partial response (PR), complete response (CR), or complete response with incomplete blood count recover (CRi), response status was confirmed every 12 weeks. In responding participants, duration of response was assessed from the start of treatment through the last documented response before documented progressive disease or death. The outcome is reported as the median value for duration of response, with full range.~CR: Bone marrow blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; ANC > 1000/μL; platelet > 100,000/μL; independence of red cell transfusions.~CRi: All CR criteria except ANC < 1000/μL or platelet count < 100,000/μL.~PR: All hematologic criteria of CR; except decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to 5% to 25%; & decrease of pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%." (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionweeks (Median)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin24

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Survival is reported as the number and proportion of participants that received midostaurin who remained alive 2 years after starting midostaurin treatment. (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"Progression-free survival (PFS) is reported as the number and proportion of participants who did not receive hematopoietic cell transplantation, and who did not experience disease progression or death for any reason within 2 years after starting midostaurin treatment.~Progressive disease: Bone marrow blasts ≥ 5%; or reappearance of blasts in the blood; or development of extramedullary disease." (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin0

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"Overall response rate (ORR) was assessed as the number and proportion of participants who received midostaurin and achieved a partial response (PR), complete response (CR), or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi).~Complete remission (CR): Bone marrow blasts < 5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1000/μL; platelet count > 100,000/μL; independence of red cell transfusions.~CR with incomplete recovery (CRi): All CR criteria except for ANC < 1000/μL or platelet count < 100,000/μL.~Partial remission (PR): All hematologic criteria of CR; except decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to 5% to 25%; and decrease of pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50%." (NCT01846624)
Timeframe: up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine, Then Midostaurin10

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR or CRi at Cycle 1 Day 28

Response rate (percentage of participants who achieved CR or CRi) was measured using international working group (IWG) criteria. Response rate is defined as complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) in children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. CRi is defined as morphologic CR with residual neutropenia (less than [<] 1,000/microliter) or thrombocytopenia <100,000/ microliter). CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (>) 1,000/ microliter, platelet count of >100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 28

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine20

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR or CRi at Cycle 2 Day 28

Response rate (percentage of participants who achieved CR or CRi) was measured using international working group (IWG) criteria. Response rate is defined as complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) in children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. CRi is defined as morphologic CR with residual neutropenia (less than [<] 1,000/microliter) or thrombocytopenia <100,000/ microliter). CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (>) 1,000/ microliter, platelet count of >100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 (28 days) Day 28

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine66.7

[back to top]

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR or CRi at End of Study Treatment

Response rate (percentage of participants who achieved CR or CRi) was measured using international working group (IWG) criteria. Response rate is defined as complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) in children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. CRi is defined as morphologic CR with residual neutropenia (less than [<] 1,000/microliter) or thrombocytopenia <100,000/ microliter). CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (>) 1,000/ microliter, platelet count of >100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: End of study treatment (approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine12.5

[back to top]

Phase 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Decitabine

AUC is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of decitabine. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 5: pre-infusion, 0.5 hour during infusion, end of infusion and at 5 min, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hour after end of infusion

Interventionnanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL) (Median)
> 1 month to <= 2 years> 2 to <= 6 years> 6 to <= 12 years> 12 to <= 16 years
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine124.8131.5158.9162.4

[back to top]

Phase 1 and 2: Total Clearance of Decitabine

Total clearance of drug after intravenously administration was calculated as: dose/area under the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 5: pre-infusion, 0.5 hour during infusion, end of infusion and at 5 minute (min), 0.5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hour after end of infusion

Interventionliter per hour per square meter (Median)
>1 month to less than or equal to (<=) 2 yearsGreater than (>) 2 to <= 6 years> 6 to <= 12 years> 12 to <= 16 years
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine160.6152.1125.9123.2

[back to top]

Phase 2: Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as weeks from date of first response to date of first relapse or date of death. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: From time of response to relapse, study completion/withdrawal, or death, whichever comes first, for up to approximately 3 years 10 months

Interventionweeks (Number)
Participant 1Participant 2
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine44.66.3

[back to top]

Phase 1 and 2: Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Decitabine

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 5: pre-infusion, 0.5 hour during infusion, end of infusion and at 5 min, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hour after end of infusion

Interventionliter per square meter (Median)
> 1 month to <= 2 years> 2 to <= 6 years> 6 to <= 12 years> 12 to <= 16 years
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine35.936.531.835.9

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate is defined as percentage of participants with complete remission (CR) +complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi)+partial remission (PR) per IWG Criteria. CRi: morphologic CR with residual neutropenia (less than [<] 1,000/microliter) or thrombocytopenia <100,000/microliter). CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (>) 1,000/ microliter platelet count of >100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment. PR: all the same hematologic values of a CR, but with a decrease of >=50% of the percentage of blasts to 5% to 25% in the bone marrow aspirate. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3 years 10 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine37.5

[back to top]

Phase 1 and 2: Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAEs are defined as adverse events with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment. An adverse event is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: Approximately 3 years 10 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine17

[back to top]

Phase 1 and 2: Event-Free Survival

Event free survival is defined as the time from first dose of study drug to relapse from CR, death, or second malignancy for participants who achieved CR. CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (>) 1,000/ microliter platelet count of >100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: From enrollment to progression/relapse, death, or withdrawal, whichever comes first, for up to approximately 3 years 10 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine1

[back to top]

Phase 1 and 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Decitabine

Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration of Decitabine. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 5: pre-infusion, 0.5 hour during infusion, end of infusion and at 5 min, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hour after end of infusion

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Median)
> 1 month to <= 2 years> 2 to <= 6 years> 6 to <= 12 years> 12 to <= 16 years
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine118.4123.1148.7151.4

[back to top]

Phase 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to date of death from any cause. If the participant is alive or the vital status is unknown, the participant will be censored at the date the participant will be last known to be alive. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: From enrollment to death or withdrawal, whichever comes first, for up to approximately 3 years 10 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine5.1

[back to top]

Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cytarabine

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for cytarabine was based on the number of participants experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) by the end of Cycle 1. A non-hematological DLT was defined as: any Grade >=3 toxicity that persists for greater than (>) 5 days or any Grade 2 toxicity that persists for >7 days and that is intolerable to the participant. A hematological DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia due to a hypoplastic bone marrow at Day 42, in the absence of malignant infiltration. The nominal duration of each cycle was 28 days. However, participants who had not experienced bone marrow recovery at Day 28 were followed up to Day 42. Failure of marrow recovery (improvement to Grade 3) by Day 42 was considered a DLT. The maximum duration of Cycle 1 was therefore 42 days. (NCT01853228)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (42 days)

Interventiongram per square meter (Number)
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine2

[back to top]

Participants With a Response

A Response is defined as: Complete response (CR) + Complete response without platelet recovery (CRp) + CR with insufficient hematological recovery (platelets or neutrophils (CRi). CR is Neutrophil count 2: 1.0 x 10^9/L, platelet count 2: 100 x 10^9/L and bone marrow aspirate and biopsy: S5% blasts. CRp is same as CR but with Platelets < 100 x 10^/L. CRi is same as CR but platelets < 100 x 10(/L or neutrophils < 1 x 10^9. (NCT01893320)
Timeframe: 21 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I MTD Vosaroxin7
Vosaroxin + Decitabine42

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Vosaroxin in Combination With Decitabine

Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) defined as highest daily oral dose evaluated at which <33% of patients experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). A non-hematologic dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as a clinically significant grade 3 or 4 adverse event or abnormal laboratory value (according to CTCAE criteria) assessed by treating physician as related to study drug (and unrelated to disease progression, intercurrent illness, or concomitant medications) occurring during the first 28 days on study. A hematologic DLT defined as severe myelosuppression with a hypoplastic marrow with less than 5% cellularity and no evidence of leukemia 42 days from start of therapy. This will define severe and delayed myelosuppression not related to persistent leukemia and likely related to treatment. (NCT01893320)
Timeframe: 21 days

InterventionMg/m^2 (Number)
Phase I MTD Vosaroxin70

[back to top]

Determination of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Based on the Occurrence of Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) in Cycle 1

"The primary objective of the dose-escalation part of this study was to determine the MTD of volasertib in combination with decitabine. The MTD was to be identified based on the DLT information collected during the first treatment cycle of each dosing schedule. DLT was defined as a non-haematological drug-related toxicity of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥3.~The MTD corresponded to the highest dose of volasertib and decitabine at which the incidence of DLT was ≤17% (i.e. 1/6 patients) during Cycle 1." (NCT02003573)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionMilligram (mg) (Number)
Volasertib + Decitabine400

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in Cycle 1

Number of subjects with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) in Cycle 1 is presented (NCT02003573)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionparticipant (Number)
Volasertib 300 mg + Decitabine0
Volasertib 350 mg + Decitabine0
Volasertib 400 mg + Decitabine1

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The primary endpoint is the overall response rate (ORR) based on the IWG-2006 criteria, which includes complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), and hematologic improvement (HI). (NCT02010645)
Timeframe: 28 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Eltrombopag + Decitabine1

[back to top]

Frequency of Adverse Events, Graded According to NCI CTCAE v4.0

Maximum grade per participant of any AE. (NCT02029417)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after last dose of study drugs

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Treatment (Cytarabine, Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate, Decitabine)0002

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Complete Remission

"Patients are required to have all of the following to be considered as having a completion remission (CR).~Peripheral Blood Counts~Neutrophil count > 1.0 x 10^9 /L~Platelet count ≥ 100 x 10^9 /L~Reduced hemoglobin concentration or hematocrit has no bearing on remission status~Leukemic blasts must not be present in the peripheral blood~Bone Marrow Aspirate and Biopsy~Cellularity of bone marrow biopsy must be > 20% with maturation of all cell lines~< 5% blasts by morphologic review~Auer rods must not be detectable~Extramedullary leukemia, such as CNS or soft tissue involvement, must not be present" (NCT02085408)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 4 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
A (Step 1:Daunorubicin/Cytarabine; Step 2:Cytarabine; Step 3: Observation/Decitabine/Transplant)0.446
B (Step 1: Clofarabine; Step 2: Clofarabine; Step 3: Observation/Decitabine/Transplant)0.453

[back to top]

Overall Survival by Donor Status

Overall survival is defined as time between achieving leukemia-free state after induction therapy to death from any cause or date last known alive. The association between overall survival and donor status was evaluated regardless of assigned treatment arms. Patients with transplant donor information (either had donor or did not have a donor) reported after achieving CR/Cri/leukemia-free state post induction therapy were included in this analysis. (NCT02085408)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 4 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
With Transplant Donor27.2
Without Transplant Donor12.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. (NCT02085408)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 4 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
A (Step 1:Daunorubicin/Cytarabine; Step 2:Cytarabine; Step 3: Observation/Decitabine/Transplant)12.9
B (Step 1: Clofarabine; Step 2: Clofarabine; Step 3: Observation/Decitabine/Transplant)11.6

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival for Maintenance

DFS for maintenance comparison is defined as the time from maintenance randomization until relapse or death of any cause. The censored follow-up time for patients without relapse and death information is the date of last contact. Only patients who remained in CR or CRi after completion of consolidation therapy that were randomized to either observation or decitabine in the maintenance Step were included in this analysis. (NCT02085408)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months for 4 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Maintenance : Observation8.2
Maintenance : Decitabine16.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Transfusion Independence

Transfusion independence was calculated based on the number of transfusion-dependent participants at baseline who had no red blood cell or platelet transfusions for 56 consecutive days or more after treatment. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Up to 32 months

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Red Blood CellPlatelet
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 120
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 200
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 331
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 400
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 521
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation113
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination83

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Number of participants with any treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) and any AE graded ≥3 using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any Adverse EventAny Grade ≥3 Adverse Event
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 165
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 266
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 365
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 466
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 51918
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation5048
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination3028

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Decitabine

Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration. PK parameters for plasma decitabine are reported for the dose escalation stage by cohort in Phase 1 and dose confirmation and fixed-dose combination stages in Phase 2. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: At specific timepoints from 0 to 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 154.0
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 276.5
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 380.9
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 4161
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 5138
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation126
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination126

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Cedazuridine (E7727) and Cedazuridine-epimer

Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration. PK parameters are reported for the dose escalation stage by cohort in Phase 1 and dose confirmation and fixed-dose combination stages in Phase 2. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: At specific timepoints from 0 to 24 hours post-dose

,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
CedazuridineCedazuridine-epimer
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 130996
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 2376184
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 3636343
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 4697321
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 5570291
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation451235
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination293154

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve of Cedazuridine (E7727) and Cedazuridine-epimer

AUC is a measure of the plasma concentration of the drug over time (AUC0-8). PK parameters are reported for the dose escalation stage by cohort in Phase 1 and dose confirmation and fixed-dose combination stages in Phase 2. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: At specified timepoints from 0 to 24 hours post-dose

,,,,,,
Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
CedazuridineCedazuridine-epimer
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 11650503
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 21990917
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 331901670
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 448302180
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 534901560
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation23701190
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination1510710

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Decitabine in Phase 2

Tmax is the time to reach maximum plasma concentration for decitabine. PK parameters for plasma decitabine are reported for the dose confirmation and fixed-dose combination stages. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: At specific timepoints from 0 to 24 hours post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation1.00
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination0.95

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Response in Phase 2 - Kaplan-Meier Estimate

Duration of response (in number of days) was calculated from the first time the response was observed to time of relapse or last time point in the study. Kaplan-Meier estimate for complete response is shown. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 29 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation413.0
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination155.0

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Response in Phase 1

Duration of response (in number of days) was calculated from the first time the response was observed to time of relapse or last time point in the study. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Up to 32 Months

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 1546.00
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 2364.00
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 3470.00
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 429.00
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 5399.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response in Phase 1

The evaluation of response was based on International Working Group 2006 MDS Response Criteria, with overall response calculated as number of participants with complete response+partial response+marrow complete response+hematological improvement (CR+PR+mCR+HI). (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Up to 32 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 14
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 23
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 32
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 41
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 53

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematological Improvement

Hematological improvement was calculated as defined by the IWG 2006 MDS Response Criteria. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Up to 32 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 14
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 23
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 32
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 40
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 53
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation8
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination7

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Cedazuridine (E7727) and Cedazuridine-epimer

Tmax is the time to maximum observed plasma concentration. PK parameters are reported for the dose escalation stage by cohort in Phase 1 and the dose confirmation and fixed-dose combination stages in Phase 2. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: At specific timepoints from 0 to 24 hours post-dose

,,,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
CedazuridineCedazuridine-epimer
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 133
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 233
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 333
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 433
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 533
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation33
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination33.05

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity in Phase 1

Number of participants with protocol-specified dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the dose escalation stage. DLTs were defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 (CTCAEv4.0), specifically ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (except Grade 3 nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea that is controllable by anti-emetics or optimal therapy or related to underlying disease or disease progression), specific Grade 3 laboratory tests, related prolonged Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia that was not present prior to dosing, does not resolve within 14 days, and is not related to underlying disease, or any toxicity related to study treatment that results in treatment delays of >4 weeks after Day 28. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Up to Day 28 in Course 1 (28 days per course)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 10
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 20
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 30
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 40
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 51

[back to top]

Mean Decitabine Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Ratio (5-day AUC0-t) in Phase 2

Decitabine 5-day AUC ratio following IV decitabine 20 mg/m^2 infusion versus concomitant oral administration of decitabine + cedazuridine (E7727) or ASTX727 in the dose combination and fixed-dose combination stages, respectively. AUC0-t (the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last (tlast) quantifiable concentration (Ct)) by dose/cohort and course/days was used for estimating decitabine cumulative 5-day AUC0-t exposures. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to Day 5

InterventionRatio of Geometric LSM (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation93.52
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination97.59

[back to top]

Mean Decitabine Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve (AUC0-t) on Day 5 by Cohort in Phase 1

Mean AUC0-t of oral decitabine given with cedazuridine (E7727) following IV decitabine 20 mg/m^2 infusion on Day 5. AUCs were calculated by the linear up/log down method using the measured concentration-time values above the BQL (below the limit of quantification). (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Day 5

Interventionng*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 153.6
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 268.9
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 394.8
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 4221
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 5146

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response in Phase 2

The evaluation of response was based on International Working Group (IWG) 2006 MDS Response Criteria, with overall response calculated as number of participants with complete response+partial response+marrow complete response+hematological improvement (CR+PR+mCR+HI). (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 29 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation29
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination19

[back to top]

Mean Maximum %LINE Demethylation in Phase 1

Mean maximum % long interspread nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) demethylation decrease from baseline after oral decitabine + cedazuridine (E7727) or ASTX727 compared with IV decitabine 20 mg/m^2 in the dose escalation stage. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to Day 28 in Course 2 (28 days per course)

,,,,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Course 1Course 2
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 1-8.3-8.0
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 2-9.2-7.1
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 3-10.5-8.9
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 4-12.1-8.6
Phase 1 Dose Escalation Cohort 5-11.7-7.5

[back to top]

Mean Maximum %LINE Demethylation in Phase 2

Mean maximum % long interspread nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) demethylation after oral decitabine + cedazuridine (E7727) or ASTX727 (Course 1 or Course 2 - Treatment) compared with IV decitabine 20 mg/m^2 (Course 1 or Course 2 - IV Decitabine) in the dose confirmation and fixed-dose combination stages, respectively. Least squares mean of maximum %LINE-1 methylation change from baseline. (NCT02103478)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to Day 28 in Course 2 (28 days per course)

,
InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Course 1 - TreatmentCourse 1 - IV DecitabineCourse 2 - TreatmentCourse 2 - IV Decitabine
Phase 2 Dose Confirmation11.15911.3039.8339.920
Phase 2 Fixed-Dose Combination10.07712.6658.1348.230

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

(NCT02109744)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Decitabine Followed by Rapamycin6.9

[back to top]

Mean Change in Blast Percentage in Marrow

Complete blood count with differential. (NCT02109744)
Timeframe: baseline and four weeks

Interventionpercentage of cells (Mean)
Decitabine Followed by Rapamycin-18.5

[back to top]

Blast Percentage in Peripheral Blood

bone marrow aspirate and biopsy exam (NCT02109744)
Timeframe: baseline and four weeks

Interventionpercentage of cells (Mean)
baselineweek 4
Decitabine Followed by Rapamycin24.714.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival of Patients Over Age 60 With Newly Diagnosed AML/High Risk MDS

Compared to historical data of a completed Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) trial of azacitidine and gemtuzumab ozogamicin. (NCT02121418)
Timeframe: At 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Decitabine, Cytarabine)7

[back to top]

Response Rate

Rate of Complete Response or Complete Response with Incomplete Count Recovery (NCT02121418)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete RespnoseComplete Response with Incomplete Count Recovery
Treatment (Decitabine, Cytarabine)43

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Post-MPN Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With JAK2 Mutations (Phase 2)

JAK2 mutations were assessed with the baseline Bone Marrow or Peripheral Blood. (NCT02257138)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ph2 Treatment (Ruxolitinib Phosphate, Decitabine)11

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Ruxolitinib Phosphate (Phase I)

Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the highest dose studied for which the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is less than or equal to 17% (1 out of 6). (NCT02257138)
Timeframe: Up to 6 weeks

InterventionDose in Milligrams (Number)
Ph1 (MTD) Treatment (Ruxolitinib Phosphate, Decitabine)NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Response (Complete Response [CR] + CR With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery) (Phase 2)

Complete Response (CR) is defined as - The participant must be free of all symptoms related to leukemia and have an absolute neutrophil count >/= 1 z 10^9/L, no need for red blood cell transfusion, platelet count>/+ 100 x 10^9/L, and normal marrow differential (NCT02257138)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ph2 Treatment (Ruxolitinib Phosphate, Decitabine)8

[back to top]

Number of JAK2 Positive+ and JAK2 Negative- Participants With a Response (Phase 2)

JAK2 mutations were assessed with the baseline Bone Marrow or Peripheral Blood. Complete Response (CR) is defined as - The participant must be free of all symptoms related to leukemia and have an absolute neutrophil count >/= 1 z 10^9/L, no need for red blood cell transfusion, platelet count>/+ 100 x 10^9/L, and normal marrow differential (NCT02257138)
Timeframe: up to 6 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
JAK 2+ PositiveJAK 2- negative
Ph2 Treatment (Ruxolitinib Phosphate, Decitabine)53

[back to top]

Tolerability (Number of Participants Without Adverse Events)

(NCT02332889)
Timeframe: 20 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine/Vaccine Therapy1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Laboratory Abnormalities

Treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were defined as values that increase at least one toxicity grade from baseline. The most severe graded abnormality from all tests was counted for each participant. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)

,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Any Laboratory AbnormalityGrade 3 or 4 Laboratory Abnormalities
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100100
Group A Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin10098.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine100100
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine100100
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)10092.9
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)10085.7
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)94.194.1
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg10085.7
Group C Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg10082.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at the End of Induction

Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Overall response included CR, CRc, CRi, and partial remission (PR). CR required all of the following: < 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. CRi required all of the CR criteria except the criterion of neutrophils and platelets. PR required all of the following: ≥ 50% decrease in blasts in bone marrow aspirate to a range of 5% to 25%; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; Independent of transfusions; and A value of ≤ 5% blasts was also considered a PR if Auer rods were detected. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100.0
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin77.8
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin70.7
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine40.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine50.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)25.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)23.5
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)14.3
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg14.3
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)15.4
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)11.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

(NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to the last dose date plus 30 days (maximum: 18 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100.0
Group A Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine100.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine100.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)100.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)100.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)100.0
Group C Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg100.0
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Morphologic Complete Remission (CR) at the End of Induction

Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Morphologic CR included CR and cytogenetic CR (CRc). CR required all of the following: < 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/microliter (mcL); Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin66.7
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin66.7
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin46.3
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine0.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine16.7
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)25.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)0.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)7.1
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg0.0
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)15.4
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)11.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Composite Complete Remission at the End of Induction

Clinical response was assessed according to the International Working Group criteria (Cheson 2003). Composite complete remission included CR, CRc, and morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). CR required all of the following: < 5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate; Neutrophils ≥ 1,000/mcL; Platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL; No extramedullary disease; No blasts with Auer rods detected; and Independent of transfusions. CRc, in addition to CR criteria, required reversion to a normal karyotype with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis. CRi required all of the CR criteria except the criterion of neutrophils and platelets. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: At the end of induction (Group A: up to end of Cycle 2; Group B: up to end of Cycle 4) (cycle length = up to 28 days); Group C: From Day 1 until meeting the criteria for study treatment discontinuation (up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin100.0
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin77.8
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin65.9
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine40.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine50.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)25.0
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)23.5
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)14.3
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg14.3
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)0.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)15.4
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)11.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLTs refer to toxicities experienced during the first 28 days of study treatment that have been judged to be clinically significant and related to study treatment. DLT assessment was applicable only for Phase 1b and Phase 2 safety run-in participants. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: Group A: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 2 Day 28; Group B: Cycle 0 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28; Group C: Cycle 1 Day 1 to Cycle 1 Day 28 (Cycle length: for Cycle 0 = 14 days, for all other cycles = 28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin0
Group A Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine16.7
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)0
Group C Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg0
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg16.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time interval from the start of the study therapy to death from any cause. Median OS was analyzed using KM method. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to approximately 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin37.1
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin34.1
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + DaunorubicinNA
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine3.2
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine5.3
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)6.9
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)7.3
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)6.2
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg5.9
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg5.6
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)8.2
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)7.9
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)2.2

[back to top]

Event Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was defined as the time interval from the start of the study therapy until the date of treatment failure, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who received other anti-cancer therapy (prior to the event if any) were censored. Median EFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. (NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to approximately 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + DaunorubicinNA
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin1.9
Group A Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin9.0
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine2.2
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine2.9
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)2.3
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)3.2
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)2.4
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg1.8
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg1.8
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C1A - R/R AML)1.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C2 - MLL)1.0
Group C Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg (Cohort C3 - Untreated AML)1.7

[back to top]

Duration of Exposure of Entospletinib

(NCT02343939)
Timeframe: First dose date up to approximately 3 years

Interventionweeks (Median)
Group A Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin8.6
Group A Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg + Cytarabine + Daunorubicin7.1
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 200 mg + Decitabine13.7
Group B Phase 1b ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine15.4
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Safety Run-In)10.1
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Decitabine (Randomized)13.9
Group B Phase 2 ENTO 400 mg + Azacitidine (Randomized)10.1
Group C Phase 1b/2 ENTO 400 mg4.4
Group C Phase 1b ENTO 800 mg7.6

[back to top]

Part B: Time to Best Response

Time to best response is calculated as the time from the randomization date to the first documented date for the best response for participants who achieved CR or CRi, as per modified IWG criteria. CR: Bone marrow blasts less than (<)5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count greater than (>)1.0 *10^9/liter (L) (1000/mcL); platelet count >100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts <5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia <100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis. (NCT02472145)
Timeframe: Approximately 2.5 years

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Part B: Decitabine (Alone)16.71
Part B: Decitabine + JNJ-5602247318.14

[back to top]

Part B: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) Plus Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Complete Response With Incomplete Recovery (CRi)

Percentage of participants who achieved CR plus MRD-negative CRi were reported. MRD negativity defined as <1 blast or leukemic stem cell in 10,000 leukocytes (MRD level <10^4).CR: Bone marrow blasts less than (<)5 percent (%); absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count greater than (>)1.0*10^9/liter (L) (1000/mcL); platelet count >100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts <5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia <100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis. (NCT02472145)
Timeframe: Approximately 2.5 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part B: Decitabine (Alone)13.8
Part B: Decitabine + JNJ-5602247321.3

[back to top]

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR and CRi (Overall Response Rate)

Percentage of participants who achieved CR and CRi, as per modified IWG criteria. CR: Bone marrow blasts less than (<)5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count greater than (>)1.0 *10^9/liter (L) (1000/ mcL); platelet count >100 *10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts <5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia <100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis. (NCT02472145)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 2.5 years

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Part B: Decitabine (Alone)20.1
Part B: Decitabine + JNJ-5602247326.8

[back to top]

Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (Complete Response Rate) Based on Investigator Assessment

Complete response rate defined as percentage of participants who achieved complete response as per modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria. CR: Bone marrow blasts less than (<)5 percent (%); absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count greater than (>)1.0*10^9/liter (L) (1000/micro liter [mcL]); platelet count >100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis. (NCT02472145)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 2.5 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part B: Decitabine (Alone)11.9
Part B: Decitabine + JNJ-5602247316.6

[back to top]

Part B: Event-free Survival (EFS) Based on Investigator Assessment

EFS defined as time from randomization to treatment failure, relapse from CR/CRi, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, per modified IWG criteria. Treatment failure: >25% absolute increase in the bone marrow blast count from baseline to present assessment (example, 20% to 46%) on bone marrow aspirate (or biopsy in case of dry tap); Relapse: Bone marrow blasts greater than equal to (>=)5%; reappearance of blasts in blood; or development of extramedullary disease; CR: Bone marrow blasts <5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count > 1.0*10^9/L (1000/mcL); platelet count >100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL);independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts <5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia <1.0*10^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia <100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. Endpoint reported is for Part B only as per planned analysis. (NCT02472145)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 2.5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part B: Decitabine (Alone)6.24
Part B: Decitabine + JNJ-560224734.50

[back to top]

Part B: Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Investigator Assessment

DOR defined as number of weeks from documented best response (CR or CRi) for participants who achieved CR or CRi to relapse, death due to relapse, date of censoring. As per modified IWG criteria: CR: Bone marrow blasts <5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease;absolute neutrophil count >1.0*10^9/L (1000/mcL); platelet count >100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions; CRi: Bone marrow blasts <5 %; absence of blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; residual neutropenia <1.0* 10^9/L (1000/mcL) or thrombocytopenia <100*10^9/L (100 000/mcL); independence of red cell transfusions. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis. (NCT02472145)
Timeframe: Approximately 2.5 years

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Part B: Decitabine (Alone)23.71
Part B: Decitabine + JNJ-56022473NA

[back to top]

Part B: Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to date of death from any cause. Median Overall Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. This endpoint is reported here for Part B only as per the planned analysis. (NCT02472145)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 2.5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Part B: Decitabine (Alone)7.26
Part B: Decitabine + JNJ-560224735.36

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Platelet Count Recovery

Platelet response refers to a sustained increase (stable or increasing level) of at least 30×10E9/L independent of transfusion for 3 days. (NCT02487563)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks after the treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Experimental Group 120
Experimental Group 222
Control Group6

[back to top]

Megakaryocyte Count

The total number of megakaryocytes as well as the platelet-shedding megakaryocytes of bone marrow smears (per cm2) was counted and cross-checked by blinded observers. (NCT02487563)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks after the treatment

Interventioncells/cm^2 (Median)
Experimental Group 16.7
Experimental Group 27.5
Control Group3.3

[back to top]

Remission Duration

Time from CR documentation to AML relapse (NCT02532010)
Timeframe: time from complete remission to AML relapse, assessed throughout the study period up to 2 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Pacritinib and DecitiabineNA
Arm B: Pacritinib and CytarabineNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Survival following treatment to the date of death (NCT02532010)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Pacritinib and Decitiabine3
Arm B: Pacritinib and Cytarabine3

[back to top]

Complete Remission Rate

Complete remission rate is defined as number of subjects with complete remission according to the IWG criteria, which is defined by presence of <5 percent of blasts in the bone marrow, absence of blasts with Auer rods, absence of extramedullary disease, absolute neutrophil count >1.0 x 109/L (1000/µL); platelet count >100 x 109/L (100,000/µL); independence of red cell transfusions. (NCT02532010)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Pacritinib and Decitiabine0
Arm B: Pacritinib and Cytarabine0

[back to top]

Overall Remission Rate

Overall remission rate is defined as number of subjects with complete remission (CR), Complete Remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), Complete Remission with Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi), Partial Remission (PR) according to the IWG criteria. CRi is defined as All CR criteria except for residual neutropenia (<1.0 x 109/L (1000/µL)) or thrombocytopenia (<100 x 109/L (100,000/µL)), PR is defined as relevant in the setting of phase I and II clinical trials only; all hematologic criteria of CR; decrease of bone marrow blast percentage to 5 to 25 percent; and decrease of pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage by at least 50 percent. (NCT02532010)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Pacritinib and Decitiabine0
Arm B: Pacritinib and Cytarabine0

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Time from entry on study until time at which there is treatment failure, AML relapse, or death from any cause (NCT02532010)
Timeframe: Time from entry on study until time at which there is treatment failure, AML relapse, or death from any cause, assessed throughout the study period up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Pacritinib and Decitiabine2.5
Arm B: Pacritinib and Cytarabine3

[back to top]

Time to Complete Response

Time from entry on study until documentation of complete remission (CR) (NCT02532010)
Timeframe: From entry on study until complete remission, assessed throughout the study period up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Pacritinib and DecitiabineNA
Arm B: Pacritinib and CytarabineNA

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival

Time from complete remission documentation to either AML relapse or death from any cause. (NCT02532010)
Timeframe: From date of complete remission until either AML relapse or death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed throughout the study period up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A: Pacritinib and DecitiabineNA
Arm B: Pacritinib and CytarabineNA

[back to top]

Phase I-Ib and Dose Ranging Part: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period

"Number of participants with AEs (any AE regardless of seriousness) and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs.~AE grades to characterize the severity of the AEs were based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. For CTCAE v4.03, Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = death related to AE.~The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to 30 days after last dose, with a maximum duration of 2 years for sabatolimab and 5 years for sabatolimab in combination with spartalizumab

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsTreatment-related AEsAEs with grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs with grade ≥ 3SAEsFatal SAEsAEs leading to discontinuationAEs leading to dose adjustment/interruptionAEs requiring additional therapy
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W1410102700212
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W17771701017
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W133101811112
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan200000012
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW512021004
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan513000013
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW624040003
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan301000013
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW953010004
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW743010017
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan612000016
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW14660601312
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW967050127
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan200000002
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW13950420313
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W624030125
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W654221235
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W545143015
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W653021034
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W553030105
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W736110013
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W11532201110
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W640000014
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W523040034
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W645130026
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W12791610312
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W311010013
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W634140016

[back to top]

Phase I-Ib and Dose Ranging Part: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of Sabatolimab

Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of sabatolimab and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of sabatolimab. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to last dose, with a maximum duration of 1.9 years for sabatolimab and 4.9 years for sabatolimab in combination with spartalizumab

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
At least one dose reductionAt least one dose interruption
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W01
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W00
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W01
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan02
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW01
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan01
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW23
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW11
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW02
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W02
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W02
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W02
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W02
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W01

[back to top]

Phase Ib: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of Spartalizumab

Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of spartalizumab and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of spartalizumab. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to last dose, with a maximum duration of 4.9 years

,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
At least one dose reductionAt least one dose interruption
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W02
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W02
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W02
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W01
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W12
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W01

[back to top]

Phase II: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the On-treatment Period

"Number of participants with AEs and SAEs, including changes from baseline in vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory results qualifying and reported as AEs.~AE grades to characterize the severity of the AEs were based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03. For CTCAE v4.03, Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = death related to AE.~The on-treatment period is defined from the day of first administration of study treatment up to 30 days after the date of its last administration." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to 30 days after last dose, with a maximum duration of 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsTreatment-related AEsAEs with grade ≥ 3Treatment-related AEs with grade ≥ 3SAEsFatal SAEsAEs leading to discontinuationAEs leading to dose adjustment/interruptionAEs requiring additional therapy
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma15960201014
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC166102912415

[back to top]

Phase II: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of Sabatolimab

Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of sabatolimab and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of sabatolimab. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to last dose, with a maximum duration of 2.9 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
At least one dose reductionAt least one dose interruption
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma00
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC03

[back to top]

Phase II: Number of Participants With Dose Reductions and Dose Interruptions of Spartalizumab

Number of participants with at least one dose reduction of spartalizumab and number of participants with at least one dose interruption of spartalizumab. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to last dose, with a maximum duration of 2.9 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
At least one dose reductionAt least one dose interruption
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma00
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC03

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Sabatolimab

PK parameters were calculated based on sabatolimab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the sabatolimab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan1.57
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan1.57
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W3.09

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Sabatolimab

PK parameters were calculated based on sabatolimab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the sabatolimab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 3
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W1.51.58
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan1.531.62
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW1.531.7
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan1.551.57
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW1.531.5
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW1.51.58
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW1.581.21
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan1.561.55
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW1.571.53
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW1.51.63
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W1.671.58
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW1.531.54
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W3.233.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W43.25
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W1.581.58
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W3.133
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W3.253.04
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W3.213.08
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W3.173.13
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W3.483.04
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W3.083.2
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W3.083
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W3.083.31
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W33
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W3.323.38
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma3.153.24
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC3.373.08

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Spartalizumab

PK parameters were calculated based on spartalizumab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the spartalizumab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W1.63

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Spartalizumab

PK parameters were calculated based on spartalizumab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum (peak) serum concentration following a dose. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the spartalizumab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1Cycle 3
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W1.58165
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.671.78
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.831.58
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W1.531.52
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W1.651.58
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W1.631.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W1.6713
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.571.58
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W1.51.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.581.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W1.581.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W1.611.72
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma1.581.56
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC1.581.58

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST v1.1

"DOR only applies to patients for whom best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator assessment according to RECIST v1.1. DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documented response to the date of first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a patient did not have an event, duration was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.~According to the statistical analysis plan (SAP), summary estimates of DOR using the Kaplan-Meier method were planned to be reported if there were at least 10 patients achieving a confirmed CR or PR in each treatment group/arm." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death due to underlying cancer, assessed up to 1.9 years for sabatolimab and 4.9 years for sabatolimab in combination with spartalizumab

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2WNA
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2WNA
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4WNA
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4WNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per irRC

"Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment as per irRC. ORR per irRC is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of immune related Complete Response (irCR) or immune related Partial Response (irPR).~For irRC, irCR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions and non-target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; irPR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of all target lesions including new measurable lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 1.9 years for sabatolimab and 4.9 years for sabatolimab in combination with spartalizumab

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W16.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W7.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W28.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W16.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W0
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W0
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W0
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC0
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"OS is defined as the time from date of start of treatment to date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last known date patient alive.~OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years for sabatolimab and 5.3 years for sabatolimab in combination with spartalizumab

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW4.1
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW6.7
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW10.3
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW4.3
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan4.1
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan4.2
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan5.0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan8.5
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW12.5
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW2.5
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW4.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan6.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W24.4
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W10.0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W9.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W3.1
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W20.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W5.4
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4WNA
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W3.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W8.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W12.3
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W24.8
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W18.0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W2.4
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W4.0
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W4.9
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W10.9
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC6.6
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma6.7

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) Count

The count of TILs was performed by hematoxylin and eosin stain. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Baseline (screening) and post-baseline (assessed throughout the treatment up to maximum 193 days)

Interventionpercentage change from baseline (Median)
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW41.67
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW-100.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW-25.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan-50.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan-70.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W-75.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W-66.67
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W-25.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W-50.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W-50.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W-97.50
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W-87.50
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W-66.67
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W550.00
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC-40.95
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma-48.43

[back to top]

Phase I-Ib and Dose Ranging Part: Dose Intensity of Sabatolimab

"Dose intensity of sabatolimab Q2W was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 14 days.~Dose intensity of sabatolimab Q4W was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 28 days." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to last dose, with a maximum duration of 1.9 years for sabatolimab and 4.9 years for sabatolimab in combination with spartalizumab

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW78.35
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW235.60
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW728.06
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW1203.03
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan80.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan217.50
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan758.03
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan1208.70
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW240.19
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW752.29
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW1193.10
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan1196.49
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W19.34
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W78.58
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W236.19
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W230.24
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W743.88
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W763.72
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W76.39
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W80.11
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W239.36
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W236.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W230.28
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W755.79
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W1196.15
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W79.55
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W239.68
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W1192.33

[back to top]

Phase I-Ib: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3 assessed as unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness or concomitant medications, which occurs within the first cycle of treatment with sabatolimab as single agent or in the first two cycles of treatment when sabatolimab is given in combination with spartalizumab during the dose escalation part of the study. Other clinically significant toxicities may be considered to be DLTs, even if not CTCAE grade 3 or higher. The duration of one treatment cycle is 28 days. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: 28 days (sabatolimab single agent) and 56 days (sabatolimab+spartalizumab)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W1
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0

[back to top]

Phase Ib: Dose Intensity of Spartalizumab

"Dose intensity of spartalizumab Q2W was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 14 days.~Dose intensity of spartalizumab Q4W was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 28 days." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to last dose, with a maximum duration of 4.9 years

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W77.36
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W77.83
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W78.73
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W230.24
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W74.39
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W229.12
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W76.39
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W400.53
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W79.79
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W236.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W383.22
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W377.89
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W398.72

[back to top]

Phase II: Dose Intensity of Sabatolimab

Dose intensity of sabatolimab was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 28 days. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to last dose, with a maximum duration of 2.9 years

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC772.94
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma800.00

[back to top]

Phase II: Dose Intensity of Spartalizumab

Dose intensity of spartalizumab was calculated as cumulative actual dose in milligrams divided by duration of exposure in days and then multiplied by 28 days. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From first dose of study medication up to last dose, with a maximum duration of 2.9 years

Interventionmilligrams (Mean)
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC386.47
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma400.00

[back to top]

Phase II: Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST v1.1

"Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. ORR per RECIST v1.1 is defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).~For RECIST v1.1, CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until end of treatment, assessed up to 2.9 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC0
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma0

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per irRC

"PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented and confirmed progression or death due to any cause. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor evaluation. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per irRC.~PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until first documented and confirmed progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 1.9 years for sabatolimab and 4.9 years for sabatolimab in combination with spartalizumab

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW1.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW1.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW1.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW1.7
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan1.5
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan1.9
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan2.0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan1.6
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW1.7
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW1.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW2.3
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan2.0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W3.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W3.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W1.8
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.8
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W1.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W2.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W2.4
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W2.3
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W5.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4WNA
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W2.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W1.7
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W1.8
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W1.7
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W1.7
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC1.7
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma1.8

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per RECIST v1.1

"PFS is defined as the time from the date of start of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. If a patient did not have an event, PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Tumor response was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1.~PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates." (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until first documented progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 1.9 years for sabatolimab and 4.9 years for sabatolimab in combination with spartalizumab

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW1.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW1.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW1.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW1.7
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan1.5
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan1.9
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan2.0
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan1.6
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW1.7
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW1.7
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW1.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan2.0
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W3.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W3.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W1.8
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.8
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W1.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W2.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W2.4
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W1.8
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W3.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4WNA
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W2.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W1.7
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W1.8
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W1.7
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W1.7
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC1.7
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma1.8

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Sabatolimab

PK parameters were calculated based on sabatolimab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. T1/2 was calculated by regression analysis of the terminal elimination phase. T1/2 was computed as 0.693/terminal elimination rate constant. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the sabatolimab infusion on Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

Interventiondays (Mean)
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW8.6
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW16.5
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW13.5
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW33.8
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan12.1
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW23.3
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW13.7
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW6.38
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan14.3
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W17.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W13.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W16.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W17.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W14.9
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W6.46
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W6.8
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W11.2
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W16.4
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W11.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W13.9
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W11.5
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W5.85
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W12
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W12.9
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC19.1
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma21.7

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of Spartalizumab

PK parameters were calculated based on spartalizumab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. T1/2 was calculated by regression analysis of the terminal elimination phase. T1/2 was computed as 0.693/terminal elimination rate constant. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the spartalizumab infusion on Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

Interventiondays (Mean)
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W13.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W19.9
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W29.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W13.2
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W17.4
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W30.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W32.1
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W15.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W23.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W24.3
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W22.9
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W28.7
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC24.5
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma22.7

[back to top]

All-Collected Deaths

On-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths were collected from first dose of study medication to 30 days after last dose (sabatolimab single agent) and to 150 days after last dose (sabatolimab+spartalizumab). Survival follow-up deaths were collected from 31 days (sabatolimab) and 151 days (sabatolimab+spartalizumab) after last dose until end of study. All deaths refer to the sum of on-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths plus survival follow-up deaths. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: On-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths: up to 2 years for sabatolimab and 5.3 years for sabatolimab + spartalizumab. Survival follow-up deaths: up to 2 years for sabatolimab and 5.3 years for sabatolimab + spartalizumab

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
On-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deathsAll deaths
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W55
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW55
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan44
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W33

[back to top]

All-Collected Deaths

On-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths were collected from first dose of study medication to 30 days after last dose (sabatolimab single agent) and to 150 days after last dose (sabatolimab+spartalizumab). Survival follow-up deaths were collected from 31 days (sabatolimab) and 151 days (sabatolimab+spartalizumab) after last dose until end of study. All deaths refer to the sum of on-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths plus survival follow-up deaths. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: On-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deaths: up to 2 years for sabatolimab and 5.3 years for sabatolimab + spartalizumab. Survival follow-up deaths: up to 2 years for sabatolimab and 5.3 years for sabatolimab + spartalizumab

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
On-treatment and post-treatment safety follow-up deathsSurvival follow-up deathsAll deaths
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W9312
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W8412
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan112
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan336
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW415
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW448
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW336
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan516
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW6713
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW437
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan112
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW9312
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W415
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W123
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W235
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W224
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W134
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W5611
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W325
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W224
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W224
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W549
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W6713
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W022
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma6713
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC9817

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Sabatolimab

PK parameters were calculated based on sabatolimab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUClast calculation. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the sabatolimab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

,,,
Interventionday*µg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan463
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W393
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan231
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan3220

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Sabatolimab

PK parameters were calculated based on sabatolimab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUClast calculation. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the sabatolimab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionday*µg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 3
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W37103730
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W805892
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W216223
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW27804980
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan44809080
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW28002800
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW5551350
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW8511100
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan20702300
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW16703270
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW22903590
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW128172
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W34503530
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W86.5321
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W502824
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W6061310
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W702989
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W673710
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W14504040
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W15503110
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W18702690
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W126357
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W109124
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W149165
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma24304390
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC18203060

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Spartalizumab

PK parameters were calculated based on spartalizumab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUClast calculation. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the spartalizumab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

Interventionday*µg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W470

[back to top]

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Spartalizumab

PK parameters were calculated based on spartalizumab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. The linear trapezoidal method was used for AUClast calculation. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the spartalizumab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionday*µg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 3
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W11801620
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W197366
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W160314
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W7731540
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W13002080
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W291266
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W5021280
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W152348
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W11201680
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W166389
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W8881800
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W279355
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma15702890
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC10701870

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of CD163

The tumor expression of CD163 was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of CD163 and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,
Interventionpercent marker area expression of CD163 (Median)
No clinical benefit
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan7.60
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W5.80
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W10.36
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan3.66
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW3.92
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W28.64
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW19.69

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of CD163

The tumor expression of CD163 was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of CD163 and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercent marker area expression of CD163 (Median)
Clinical benefitNo clinical benefit
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W5.413.56
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W7.414.92
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W5.665.78
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan5.535.78
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW6.055.22
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW3.797.36
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan14.560.98
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW3.1211.53
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW0.269.48
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W6.7616.17
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW0.426.95
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0.416.23
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W26.403.67
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W12.401.41
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W7.0910.62
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W1.6611.11
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W12.935.08
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W5.463.47
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W21.3626.28
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan15.4714.30
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W3.441.14
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma36.5911.88
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC16.3417.46

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of CD8+

The tumor expression of CD8+ was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of CD8+ and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

Interventionpercent marker area expression of CD8+ (Median)
Clinical benefit
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W3.81

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of CD8+

The tumor expression of CD8+ was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of CD8+ and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,
Interventionpercent marker area expression of CD8+ (Median)
No clinical benefit
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0.42
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.96
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan0.68
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW0.65
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW0.55
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan4.28
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.11

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of CD8+

The tumor expression of CD8+ was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of CD8+ and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercent marker area expression of CD8+ (Median)
Clinical benefitNo clinical benefit
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W0.110.38
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W0.600.71
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan5.540.37
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW0.730.13
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW0.010.22
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan0.260.11
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW0.352.17
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan1.000.21
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0.474.76
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW0.350.90
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0.091.25
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W0.900.16
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W3.870.18
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W0.600.59
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0.033.56
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W8.320.16
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.550.12
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W2.074.58
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW0.040.29
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W0.080.10
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma6.673.47
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC7.083.36

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of LAG-3

The tumor expression of lymphocyte-activation gene-3 (LAG-3) was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of LAG-3 and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercent marker area expression of LAG-3 (Median)
No clinical benefit
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0.30
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0.05
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.08
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan0.58
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW0.11
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW0.18
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW0.05
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan2.11
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.03

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of LAG-3

The tumor expression of lymphocyte-activation gene-3 (LAG-3) was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of LAG-3 and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercent marker area expression of LAG-3 (Median)
Clinical benefitNo clinical benefit
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W0.040.06
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W0.160.43
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W0.350.04
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan0.020.06
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan1.300.02
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW0.241.61
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW0.080.69
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0.317.63
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW0.030.10
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0.000.78
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W2.080.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.310.05
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W0.200.33
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0.011.33
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan7.120.14
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.830.06
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W2.441.49
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW0.232.68
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W0.010.07
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma3.390.57
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC3.081.98

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of PD-L1

The tumor expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of PD-1 and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,
InterventionPD-L1 positivity percentage (Median)
No clinical benefit
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W60.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W40.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan2.50
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW0.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW0.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan0.00

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of PD-L1

The tumor expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of PD-1 and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionPD-L1 positivity percentage (Median)
Clinical benefitNo clinical benefit
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W0.000.00
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W0.000.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW0.000.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan0.000.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW0.000.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW0.000.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan0.000.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW0.000.00
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W22.500.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0.005.00
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan0.000.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0.000.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W0.000.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.000.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W10.000.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0.002.50
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W5.000.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.000.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.250.50
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW0.005.00
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W0.005.00
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma7.751.00
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC80.050.0

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of TIM-3

The tumor expression of T-cell Immunoglobulin domain and Mucin domain-3 (TIM-3) was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of TIM-3 and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercent marker area expression of TIM-3 (Median)
No clinical benefit
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW4.82
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W0.71
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1.89
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan5.49
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW0.99
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W7.27
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW15.88
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan10.93
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W52.24

[back to top]

Baseline Expression of TIM-3

The tumor expression of T-cell Immunoglobulin domain and Mucin domain-3 (TIM-3) was measured by immunohistochemical methods. This record summarizes the baseline expression of TIM-3 and the clinical benefit of study treatment. Clinical benefit (BOR: CR, PR, SD or NCRNPD) and No clinical benefit (BOR: PD) was based on local investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Screening

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercent marker area expression of TIM-3 (Median)
Clinical benefitNo clinical benefit
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W1.666.20
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W2.322.16
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W5.051.50
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan6.262.36
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan6.060.88
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW2.566.10
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan41.006.74
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW6.683.96
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW1.052.70
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW3.019.32
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W4.1932.23
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W0.0411.29
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W17.810.84
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W11.270.37
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W7.136.74
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W0.668.92
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W15.1947.27
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W14.572.88
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W0.402.13
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma28.923.11
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC7.788.19

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Sabatolimab

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on sabatolimab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the sabatolimab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

,
Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan74
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan36.1

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Sabatolimab

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated based on sabatolimab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the sabatolimab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 3
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W34.631.2
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan443709
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW429563
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan457713
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW304448
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W394412
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW81.3144
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW98.8116
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan321443
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW251420
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW271333
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W86.294.4
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW2324.8
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W343557
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W7.6812.7
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W58.345.4
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W83101
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W59.7104
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W79102
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W7277
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W189422
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W213379
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W254286
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W2340.2
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W23.318.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W22.925.8
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma233316
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC185267

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Spartalizumab

PK parameters were calculated based on spartalizumab serum concentrations by using non-compartmental methods. Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed serum concentration following a dose. (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: pre-infusion and 1, 24, 168, 240 and 336 hours after completion of the spartalizumab infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1. The duration of the infusion was 30 minutes. The duration of one cycle was 28 days.

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionµg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 3
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W11280.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W21.338.4
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W66.250
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W20.134.5
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W65.197
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W121152
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W24.324
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W71.9125
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W18.640.2
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W113134
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W24.840.6
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W78.1122
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W28.827
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma126174
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC98.1143

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-sabatolimab Antibodies

"Immunogenicity was evaluated in serum in a validated three-tiered assay approach. Samples were screened for potential anti-sabatolimab antibodies and positive screen results were confirmed using a confirmatory assay. For confirmed anti-drug antibodies (ADA) positive samples, titers were determined. Patient ADA status was defined as follows:~ADA-negative at baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline~ADA-positive at baseline: ADA-positive sample at baseline~ADA-negative post-baseline: patient with ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 post baseline determinant sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples~ADA-inconclusive post-baseline = patient who does not qualify as ADA-positive or ADA-negative~Treatment-induced ADA-positive = ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-induced ADA-positive sample~Treatment-boosted ADA-positive = ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-boosted ADA-positive sample" (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Baseline (before first dose) and post-baseline (assessed throughout the treatment up to 1.9 years for sabatolimab and 4.9 years for sabatolimab in combination with spartalizumab)

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ADA-negative at baselineADA-positive at baselineADA-negative post-baselineADA- inconclusive post-baselineTreatment-induced ADA-positiveTreatment-boosted ADA-positive
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 1200mg Q4W10121000
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 240mg Q4W1205710
Dose Ranging Part: MBG453 80mg Q4W928210
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W Japan200200
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q2W ROW500500
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W Japan600600
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W ROW500500
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W Japan400310
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W ROW801700
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W ROW502210
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W Japan600600
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W ROW14001400
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W ROW701600
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W Japan200200
Phase I Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W ROW533311
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W100200
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W605010
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W502210
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W410310
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W500410
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W401310
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W12010200
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W410400
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W400400
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W510600
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W1205710
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W201100
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W503210
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma13101400
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC11111011

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Anti-spartalizumab Antibodies

"Immunogenicity was evaluated in serum in a validated three-tiered assay approach. Samples were screened for potential anti-spartalizumab antibodies and positive screen results were confirmed using a confirmatory assay. For confirmed anti-drug antibodies (ADA) positive samples, titers were determined. Patient ADA status was defined as follows:~ADA-negative at baseline: ADA-negative sample at baseline~ADA-positive at baseline: ADA-positive sample at baseline~ADA-negative post-baseline: patient with ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 post baseline determinant sample, all of which are ADA-negative samples~ADA-inconclusive post-baseline = patient who does not qualify as ADA-positive or ADA-negative~Treatment-induced ADA-positive = ADA-negative sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-induced ADA-positive sample~Treatment-boosted ADA-positive = ADA-positive sample at baseline and at least 1 treatment-boosted ADA-positive sample" (NCT02608268)
Timeframe: Baseline (before first dose) and post-baseline (assessed throughout the treatment up to 4.9 years).

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
ADA-negative at baselineADA-positive at baselineADA-negative post-baselineADA- inconclusive post-baselineTreatment-induced ADA-positiveTreatment-boosted ADA-positive
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 1200mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W302100
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 20mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W402120
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W504100
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W312201
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 240mg Q4W403200
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W302200
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 240mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W917211
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 240mg Q2W411400
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W403100
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 800mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W604110
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q2W + PDR001 80mg Q2W937111
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 400mg Q4W201100
Phase Ib Dose Escalation: MBG453 80mg Q4W + PDR001 80mg Q4W513110
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 Melanoma1307600
Phase II: MBG453 + PDR001 NSCLC1206610

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities

"Will be assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria. Patients will be monitored by medical histories, physical examinations, ophthalmologic exams, and blood studies to detect potential toxicities from the treatment.~the number of patients experiencing a DLT are reported." (NCT02650986)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1 (Cyclophosphamide, TCR/dnTGFbetaRII - Dose Level 1)0
Cohort 2 (Cyclophosphamide, TCR/dnTGFbetaRII - Dose Level 2)0
Cohort 3 (Cyclophosphamide, TCR/dnTGFbetaRII - Dose Level 3)0
Cohort 4 (Decitabine, Cyclophosphamide, TCR/dnTGFbetaRII - Dose Level 3)0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Feasibility Concerns in Manufacturing of NY-ESO-1/ dnTGFbetaRII Engineered Cells

"Unfeasibility will be defined as 3 or more preparations not meeting the lot release criteria in each cohort. Sufficient numbers of circulating, lot released confirmed T cells will be measured prior to administration.~The count of patients not meeting the preparation criteria are reported." (NCT02650986)
Timeframe: 1 month

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1 (Cyclophosphamide, TCR/dnTGFbetaRII - Dose Level 1)0
Cohort 2 (Cyclophosphamide, TCR/dnTGFbetaRII - Dose Level 2)1
Cohort 3 (Cyclophosphamide, TCR/dnTGFbetaRII - Dose Level 3)0
Cohort 4 (Decitabine, Cyclophosphamide, TCR/dnTGFbetaRII - Dose Level 3)0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival: It is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. A subject who has not died will be censored at last known date alive. Overall survival (OS) will be followed continuously while subjects are on the study drug. (NCT02664181)
Timeframe: Up to 171 weeks after beginning treatment

InterventionDays (Median)
Nivolumab844
Oral THU/Decitabine + Nivolumab389.5

[back to top]

Time-to-Progression

Time-to-Progression defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression (per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. Subjects who die without a reported prior progression will be considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Subjects who did not progress or die will be censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Subjects who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die will be censored on the date they were randomized. Subjects who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression will be censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to initiation of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Progression will be assessed every 6 weeks (from the first on-study radiographic assessment) until disease progression is noted. (NCT02664181)
Timeframe: Up to 77 weeks after beginning treatment

Interventiondays (Median)
Nivolumab227
Oral THU/Decitabine + Nivolumab69

[back to top]

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Composite Complete Remission Rate

Number of patients who achieve both remission (CR or CRi) and MRD-negative status (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MRD-negative CRc rateMRD-negative CR rateMRD-negative CRi rate
33A + HMA18810
Placebo + HMA1055

[back to top]

Mortality Rates at Day 30 and Day 60

30- and 60-day survival from date of randomization. Estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 60 days

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
30-day Mortality Rate60-day Mortality Rate
33A + HMA1123
Placebo + HMA613

[back to top]

Type, Incidence, Severity, Seriousness, and Relatedness of Adverse Events

"Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are presented and defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline) or worsening after first dose of investigational product. SAE = serious adverse event. Study treatment in this data set refers to blinded study treatment." (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Patient with any TEAEPatients with any AE related to study treatmentPatients with any SAEPatients with any SAE related to study treatmentPatients with Grade 3 or Higher AE
33A + HMA111839251103
Placebo + HMA125598920112

[back to top]

Composite Complete Remission (CRc) Rate

Number of patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) according to the modified response criteria for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) per Cheson 2003. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
33A + HMA30
Placebo + HMA26

[back to top]

Duration of Remission

Duration of remission is calculated from the first documentation of CR or CRi to the first documentation of disease relapse or death, whichever comes first. Patients who are in remission at the time of analysis cutoff are censored at the date of last response assessment. Patients who started another anticancer therapy before relapse or death are censored at the date of last response assessment prior to start of new therapy. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9.5 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
33A + HMA5.1
Placebo + HMA7.5

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Event-free survival is calculated from the time of randomization to the first documentation of progression, relapse, or death, whichever comes first. Patients who do not have event (progression, relapse, or death) prior to analysis cutoff date are censored at the date of last response assessment. Patients who started another anticancer therapy before progression, relapse, or death are censored at the date of last response assessment prior to the start of new therapy. Patients who do not have response assessment post-baseline are censored at the date of randomization. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 11.24 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
33A + HMA4.2
Placebo + HMA6.7

[back to top]

Leukemia-free Survival

Leukemia-free survival is calculated from the first documentation of blast clearance (CR, CRi, mLFS) to the first documentation of disease relapse or death, whichever comes first. Patients who are in remission at the time of analysis cutoff are censored at the date of last response assessment. Patients who started another anticancer therapy before relapse or death are censored at the date of last response assessment prior to start of new therapy. (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9.49 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
33A + HMA5.1
Placebo + HMA7.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Time from randomization to death due to any cause (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
33A + HMA5.1
Placebo + HMANA

[back to top]

Time to Complete Remission

Time to CR or CRi is the time from randomization to the first documentation of CR/CRi (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

Interventionweeks (Median)
33A + HMA9.3
Placebo + HMA9.4

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade 3 or Higher Laboratory Abnormalities

Participants who experienced a laboratory grade increase to Grade 3 or higher (per National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI CTCAE], v4.03) (NCT02785900)
Timeframe: Up to 1.5 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alanine Aminotransferase (IU/L) - HighAlbumin (g/dL) - LowAlkaline Phosphatase (IU/L) - HighAmylase (IU/L) - HighAspartate Aminotransferase (IU/L) - HighBilirubin (mg/dL) - HighCalcium (mg/dL) - LowCreatinine (mg/dL) - HighGlucose (mg/dL) - HighMagnesium (mg/dL) - HighPhosphate (mg/dL) - LowPotassium (mEq/L) - HighPotassium (mEq/L) - LowSodium (mEq/L) - LowTriacylglycerol Lipase (IU/L) - HighUrate (mg/dL) - HighHemoglobin (g/dL) - LowLeukocytes (x10^3/uL) - HighLeukocytes (x10^3/uL) - LowLymphocytes (x10^3/uL) - HighLymphocytes (x10^3/uL) - LowNeutrophils (x10^3/uL) - LowPlatelets (x10^3/uL) - Low
33A + HMA02011180122171513104590861516377
Placebo + HMA242021319090141247663704294375

[back to top]

Phase 1 - Dose Finding

To determine the recommended Phase 2 doses of Decitabine based on numbers of participants with treatment-related adverse events, evaluated according to Version 4.0 of the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). (NCT02878785)
Timeframe: Cycle length = 28 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Cohort 110
Cohort 215
Cohort 320
Cohort 420
Cohort 520
Cohort 620
Cohort 720

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Negative (MRDneg) Complete Remission (Phase II)

Compared to historical controls of filgrastim, cladribine, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone hydrochloride (G-CLAM) alone. A Simon Minimax two-stage design will be used. (NCT02921061)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Decitabine 20 mg/m2 and G-CLAM)13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Survival

(NCT02921061)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Decitabine 20 mg/m2 and G-CLAM)9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Relapse-free Survival

(NCT02921061)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Decitabine 20 mg/m2 and G-CLAM)8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Event-free Survival

(NCT02921061)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Decitabine 20 mg/m2 and G-CLAM)8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) at the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for Decitabine When Given Together With G-CLAM Toxicities (DLTs) (Phase I)

"Evaluated according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. MTD is defined as the highest dose studied in which the incidence of DLT is < 33%. Each participant was monitored for DLTs in the first 20 days of treatment. DLTs monitored included~any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting more than 48 hours that resulted in more than a 7 day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle (except for febrile neutropenia or infection)~any grade 4 or greater non-hematologic toxicity (except febrile neutropenia and infection unless a direct consequence of a treatment-related toxicity, and except constitutional symptoms if they recovered to grade 2 or less within 14 days)~lack of recovery of the absolute neutrophil count to 500/microliter or greater and lack of self-sustained platelet count of at least 50,000/microliter by treatment day +49 with no evidence of residual leukemia" (NCT02921061)
Timeframe: Up to 49 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Decitabine 20 mg/m2 and G-CLAM)3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved Remission (Complete Remission [CR]/CR With Incomplete Peripheral Blood Count Recovery [CRi])

(NCT02921061)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Decitabine 20 mg/m2 and G-CLAM)13

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival [Part 1]

Progression/relapse free survival is the time from the start of study treatment to first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurrs first. Disease progression/relapse: Bone marrow blast ≥ 5%; or reappearance of blast in the blood; or development of extramedullary disease (EMD). (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kgNA
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kgNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Chemistry Laboratory Abnormalities by Type and Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]

Chemistry laboratory abnormalities included alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, and hypophosphatemia. Each laboratory parameter was graded per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALT72525522ALT72525523Alkaline phosphatase72525522Alkaline phosphatase72525523AST72525522AST72525523Bilirubin (total)72525522Bilirubin (total)72525523Creatinine72525522Creatinine72525523Hypercalcemia72525522Hypercalcemia72525523Hyperglycemia72525522Hyperglycemia72525523Hyperkalemia72525522Hyperkalemia72525523Hypermagnesemia72525522Hypermagnesemia72525523Hypernatremia72525522Hypernatremia72525523Hypoalbuminemia72525522Hypoalbuminemia72525523Hypocalcemia72525522Hypocalcemia72525523Hypoglycemia72525522Hypoglycemia72525523Hypokalemia72525522Hypokalemia72525523Hypomagnesemia72525522Hypomagnesemia72525523Hyponatremia72525522Hyponatremia72525523Hypophosphatemia72525522Hypophosphatemia72525523
Grade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg4
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg0
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg3
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg1
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg3
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg2
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg1
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg2
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg0

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Percentage of Participants With Objective Response [Part 1]

"Objective Response was defined as morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), complete remission (CR), cytogenetic CR (CRc), molecular CR (CRm), partial remission (PR), or CR or PR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi or PRi).~MLFS: Bone marrow (BM) blasts <5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods and extramedullary disease (EMD).~CR: MLFS criteria; absolute neutrophil count (ANC)>1000/ul and platelet >100,000/ul; independence from red cell transfusions.~CRc: Reversion to a normal karyotype at the time of CR in cases with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis; based on the evaluation of 20 metaphase cells from BM.~CRm: Reversion to a molecular-negative phenotype at the time of CR. CRi: All CR criteria except for ANC <1000/ul or platelet <100,000/ul. PR: ANC >1000/ul and platelet >100,000/ul; BM blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pre-treatment levels.~PRi: ANC <1000/ul or platelet <100,000/ul; BM blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pre-treatment levels (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kgNA
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kgNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) [Part 1]

DLTs were classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 and were defined as any of a predefined set of unacceptable hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) occurring in the first treatment cycle unless clearly determined unrelated to PF-06747143. In addition, clinically important or persistent toxicities that were not included in the pre-specified criteria could be considered a DLT following review by the investigators and sponsor. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 28 of Cycle 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg0
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg1

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response Rate (ORR) [Part 1]

"Duration of ORR is the time from first documentation of MLFS, CR, CRc, CRm, PR, CRi or PRi to date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause.~MLFS: BM blasts <5%; absence of blasts with Auer rods and EMD. CR: MLFS criteria; ANC>1000/ul and platelet >100,000/ul; independence from red cell transfusions.~CRc: Reversion to a normal karyotype at the time of CR in cases with an abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis; based on the evaluation of 20 metaphase cells from BM.~CRm: Reversion to a molecular-negative phenotype at the time of CR. CRi: All CR criteria except for ANC <1000/ul or platelet <100,000/ul. PR: ANC >1000/ul and platelet >100,000/ul; BM blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pre-treatment levels.~PRi: ANC <1000/ul or platelet <100,000/ul; BM blasts decreased to 5-25% and ≥50% decrease from pre-treatment levels.~Disease progression/relapse: BM blast ≥5%; or reappearance of blast in the blood; or development of EMD." (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kgNA
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kgNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities by Type and Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]

Hematology laboratory abnormalities included anemia, hemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count increased, lymphopenia, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and white blood cell (WBC) decreased. Each laboratory parameter was graded per NCI CTCAE version 4.03. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Anemia72525522Anemia72525523Hemoglobin increased72525523Hemoglobin increased72525522Lymphocyte count increased72525523Lymphocyte count increased72525522Lymphopenia72525523Lymphopenia72525522Neutrophil count decreased72525523Neutrophil count decreased72525522Platelet count decreased72525523Platelet count decreased72525522WBC decreased72525523WBC decreased72525522
Grade 2Grade 4Grade 0Grade 1Grade 3
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg3
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg0
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg3
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg0
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg1
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg2
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg4
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) by Maximum National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) Grade [Part 1]

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product or medical device without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study treatment. AEs were graded by the investigator according to NCI CTCAE version 4.03 (Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE). AEs included non-serious AEs and SAEs. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg01011
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg00031

[back to top]

Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against PF-06747143 [Part 1]

Samples were tested for ADA using a validated assay. Number of participants with positive ADA samples was determined. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, end of treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15Cycle 2 Day 1End of treatment
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg0000
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg1000

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Part 1]

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product or medical device without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-emergent AEs were those with initial onset or increasing in severity after the first dose of study treatment. AEs included non-serious AEs and SAEs. Causality to study treatment was determined by the investigator. (NCT02954653)
Timeframe: 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AE (all causality)AE (treatment related)SAE (all causality)SAE (treatment related)
Part 1: PF-06747143 0.3 mg/kg3310
Part 1: PF-06747143 1 mg/kg4331

[back to top]

Evaluation of Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) Identified in Blood Samples Post-pembrolizumab Compared to MDSC Found in Blood Samples Collected at Baseline.

Evaluate the level of circulating MDSC per ml of blood at baseline, following treatment with pembrolizumab administered after decitabine. (NCT02957968)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of administration of decitabine and pembrolizumab Day- Window of time Days 25-29

,,
InterventionAbsolute cell count per ml of blood (Mean)
Baseline- GranulocyticPost Pembrolizumab- GranulocyticChange(Post Pembro-Baseline) GranulocyticBaseline- MonocyticPost Pembrolizumab- MonocyticChange (Post Pembro- Baseline)- MonocyticBaseline- Total MDSCPost Pembrolizumab- Total MDSCChange (Post Pembro-Baseline)- Total MDSC
Cohort A: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)13271.2033099.4019828.2059222.0522499.95-36722.1083927.6074569.75-9357.85
Cohort A2: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) With Extended Pembrolizumab77038.7163045.29-13993.4315843.2918028.432185.14138957.43133082.00-5875.43
Cohort B: HER2-negative Hormone Receptor-positive Tumors22575.5025780.333204.8345450.3321651.56-23798.78213321.1178836.72-134484.39

[back to top]

Evaluation of Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) Identified in Blood Samples Post-decitabine Compared to MDSC Found in Blood Samples Collected at Baseline.

Evaluate the level of circulating MDSC per ml of blood at baseline, following treatment with decitabine alone. (NCT02957968)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of administration of decitabine and pembrolizumab Day- Window of time Days 25-29

,,
Interventionabsolute cell count per ml of blood (Mean)
Baseline GranulocyticPost Decitabine- GranulocyticChange- GranulocyticBaseline- MonocyticPost Decitabine- MonocyticChangeBaseline- Total-MDSCPost Decitabine- Total MDSCChange- Total MDSC
Cohort A: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)13271.206279.00-6992.2059222.0520524.50-38697.5583927.6035606.00-48321.60
Cohort A2: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) With Extended Pembrolizumab77038.7143120.00-33918.7115843.2916081.57238.29138957.4392662.71-46294.71
Cohort B: HER2-negative Hormone Receptor-positive Tumors22575.5038759.5016184.0045450.3318886.00-26564.33213321.11146345.39-66975.72

[back to top]

Evaluation of Expression of Protein Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Within Tumor, Stroma, and Infiltrating Immune Cells Combined, at Baseline and Following Immunotherapy.

To evaluate the correlation of pre-existing and post-immunotherapy immune response signatures with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The number of PD-L1 positive cells (including tumor cells, lymphocytes, and macrophages) divided by the total number of tumor cells (PD-L1 positive or negative) in an area. (NCT02957968)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of administration of decitabine and pembrolizumab Day- Window of time Days 25-29

,,
InterventionNumber of PD-L1 positive cells (Mean)
Baseline (Bx 1)Post ImmunotherapyChange (Bx2-Bx1)
Cohort A: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)31.0050.0019.00
Cohort A2: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) With Extended Pembrolizumab22.5035.5013.00
Cohort B: HER2-negative Hormone Receptor-positive Tumors13.0729.0716.00

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Pathologic Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and Post-therapy Lymph Nodes.

To determine the rate of pCR in the breast and lymph nodes (pCR breast and nodes). The number of patients with pCR in the breast and post-therapy lymph nodes defined as the absence of any invasive cancer in the resected breast specimen and absence of cancer on H&E evaluation of all resected lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant therapy (ypT0/is; ypN0). (NCT02957968)
Timeframe: 30 days following surgery or last dose of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)10
Cohort B: HER2-negative Hormone Receptor-positive Tumors3
Cohort A2: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) With Extended Pembrolizumab1

[back to top]

Number of Patients Meeting Criteria for Lymphocyte-predominant Breast Cancer (LPBC) Following Treatment With Decitabine and Pembrolizumab

To determine if the study treatment increases the proportion of tumors with ≥ 60% tumor or stromal area infiltrated with lymphocytes (ie, LPBC). The percentage of patients meeting criteria for LPBC following treatment with decitabine and pembrolizumab compared to the percentage before treatment (LPBC is defined as breast cancer with ≥ 60% intratumoral or stromal area with infiltrating lymphocytes.) (NCT02957968)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of administration of decitabine and pembrolizumab Day- Window of time Days 25-29

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort A: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)3
Cohort B: HER2-negative Hormone Receptor-positive Tumors0
Cohort A2: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) With Extended Pembrolizumab0

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Reported During and After Immune Treatment (ie, Decitabine and Pembrolizumab)

"Using criteria in the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0), all adverse events (AEs) regardless of grade or attribution, will be captured from the beginning of study treatment (initiation of decitabine) until initiation of standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy.~For patients who do not initiate pembrolizumab, all AEs will be captured until 30 days following the last dose of decitabine or until another cancer treatment is initiated, whichever occurs first.For patients who initiate pembrolizumab, immune related adverse events (irAEs) (clinically significant and non-clinically significant) will be captured from the initiation of pembrolizumab through the end of the 30- day post-surgery (or post-treatment, for those who don't have surgery) follow-up period and at a 12-month follow-up time point." (NCT02957968)
Timeframe: Time of study registration until 30 days following the last dose of decitabine, or until another cancer treatment was initiated, or 30 days following surgery, 12- months.

InterventionAdverse Events Reported (Number)
Cohort A: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)215
Cohort B: HER2-negative Hormone Receptor-positive Tumors151
Cohort A2: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) With Extended Pembrolizumab98

[back to top]

The Percentage of Increase in Tumor and Stroma With Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL) From Baseline Pre-treatment Biopsy to Post-immunotherapy Biopsy Following Administration of Decitabine Followed by Pembrolizumab.

To determine and quantify if treatment with neoadjuvant decitabine followed by pembrolizumab increases lymphocyte infiltration into tumor and/or stroma in patients with locally advanced, HER2-negative breast cancer. (NCT02957968)
Timeframe: Baseline pre-treatment biopsy to post-immunotherapy biopsy following administration of decitabine followed by pembrolizumab, 3-7 day window after Day 22 medication administration, about one month

,,
Intervention% of stromal area occupied by TIL (Mean)
BaselinePost TreatmentAbsolute Change Value
Cohort A: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)27.3535.007.65
Cohort A2: Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) With Extended Pembrolizumab25.8332.506.67
Cohort B: HER2-negative Hormone Receptor-positive Tumors17.5023.576.07

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of participants overall survival is defined as death from any cause (NCT02996474)
Timeframe: from enrollment until date of death, assessed up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Pembrolizumab and Decitabine for Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia0

[back to top]

Median Duration (Days) of Response From Initial Achievement of Response to Loss of Response (mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD)

"To determine duration (days) of response as defined as time from initial achievement of response to loss of response (mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD).~Measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission is no evidence of residual disease, < 5% blasts, no Auer rods and may be with mCR or without count recovery (ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl and platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl) as mCRi. Morphologic complete remission (CR) is ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl, platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl, < 5% blasts, no Auer rods, no evidence of disease; Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) is same as CR but ANC may be < 1,000/mcl and/or platelet count < 100,000/mcl; Partial remission (PR) is ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl, platelet count > 100,000/mcl, and at least a 50% decrease in the percentage of marrow aspirate blasts to 5-25%, or marrow blasts < 5% with persistent Auer rods. Stable disease (SD) is absence of a complete or partial response, and no progressive disease." (NCT02996474)
Timeframe: At the end of each cycle 2 (week 6), 4 (week 12), 6 (week 18), 8 (up to week 24)

Interventiondays (Median)
Pembrolizumab and Decitabine for Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia148

[back to top]

Median Duration (Days) of Best Response From Initial Achievement of Best Response to Loss of Best Response (by the Order of mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD)

Duration of Best Response is time (days) from initial achievement of best response to loss of best response. Best response is defined by the order of mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission is no evidence of residual disease, < 5% blasts, no Auer rods and may be with mCR or without count recovery (ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl and platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl) as mCRi. Morphologic complete remission (CR) is ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl, platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl, < 5% blasts, no Auer rods, no evidence of disease; Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) is same as CR but ANC may be < 1,000/mcl and/or platelet count < 100,000/mcl; Partial remission (PR) is ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl, platelet count > 100,000/mcl, and at least a 50% decrease in the percentage of marrow aspirate blasts to 5-25%, or marrow blasts < 5% with persistent Auer rods. Stable disease (SD) is absence of a complete or partial response, and no progressive disease. (NCT02996474)
Timeframe: At the end of each cycle 2 (week 6), 4 (week 12), 6 (week 18), 8 (up to week 24)

Interventiondays (Median)
Pembrolizumab and Decitabine for Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia148

[back to top]

Median Days to Best Response From Start of Study to Initial Achievement of Best Response (by the Order of mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD)

Time to Best Response is defined as time (days) from start of study to initial achievement of best response. Best response is defined by the order of mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission is no evidence of residual disease, < 5% blasts, no Auer rods and may be with mCR or without count recovery (ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl and platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl) as mCRi. Morphologic complete remission (CR) is ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl, platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl, < 5% blasts, no Auer rods, no evidence of disease; Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) is same as CR but ANC may be < 1,000/mcl and/or platelet count < 100,000/mcl; Partial remission (PR) is ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl, platelet count > 100,000/mcl, and at least a 50% decrease in the percentage of marrow aspirate blasts to 5-25%, or marrow blasts < 5% with persistent Auer rods. Stable disease (SD) is absence of a complete or partial response, and no progressive disease. (NCT02996474)
Timeframe: At the end of each cycle 2 (week 6), 4 (week 12), 6 (week 18), 8 (up to week 24)

Interventiondays (Median)
Pembrolizumab and Decitabine for Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia42

[back to top]

Median Days to First Response From Start of Study to Initial Achievement of First Response (mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD)

"Time to first response (days) is time from start of study to first response (mCR, mCRi, CR, CRi, PR, or SD) in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) participants.~Measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission is no evidence of residual disease, < 5% blasts, no Auer rods and may be with mCR or without count recovery (ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl and platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl) as mCRi. Morphologic complete remission (CR) is ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl, platelet count ≥ 100,000/mcl, < 5% blasts, no Auer rods, no evidence of disease; Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) is same as CR but ANC may be < 1,000/mcl and/or platelet count < 100,000/mcl; Partial remission (PR) is ANC ≥ 1,000/mcl, platelet count > 100,000/mcl, and at least a 50% decrease in the percentage of marrow aspirate blasts to 5-25%, or marrow blasts < 5% with persistent Auer rods. Stable disease (SD) is absence of a complete or partial response, and no progressive disease." (NCT02996474)
Timeframe: At the end of each cycle 2 (week 6), 4 (week 12), 6 (week 18), 8 (up to week 24)

Interventiondays (Median)
Pembrolizumab and Decitabine for Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia42

[back to top]

Feasibility of a Novel Combination of Pembrolizumab and Decitabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Participants

The number of patients who could be treated with a novel combination of Pembrolizumab and Decitabine in relapsed/refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia participants without being removed from the protocol due to treatment related toxicities. (NCT02996474)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pembrolizumab and Decitabine for Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia10

[back to top]

Response Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations

-Response will be assessed according to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recommendations (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)Morphologic leukemia free state (mLFS)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)
Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations0010
Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations5152

[back to top]

Survival Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment

"Morphologically evident disease (>5% blasts by cytomorphology)~Molecularly detected disease (disease detected with flow cytometry, cytogenetic, or mutational analysis with ≤ 5% blasts by cytomorphology)" (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Morphologically Evident Disease215
Molecularly Detected Disease336

[back to top]

Survival Compared Between Patients With Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations Versus Patients With Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations

(NCT03063203)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Presence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 Mutations254
Absence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Addition to TP53 MutationsNA

[back to top]

Time to Stem Cell Transplant Among Participants Who Are Suitable Candidates for Transplant and Have an Identified Donor

"Document the number of days that it takes each participant to reach transplant~Transplant eligible participants are those who achieve complete remission (CR), cytogenetic complete remission (CRc), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or morphologic leukemia free state (mLFS) per 2017 ELN AML Recommendations." (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Decitabine117

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS)

-Event-free survival is defined as the interval from the date of first dose of study drug to date of treatment failure, recurrence, death due to any cause, or loss to follow up. (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: 2 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Decitabine227

[back to top] [back to top]

Response Compared Between Patients With Morphologically Evident Disease Versus Patients With Molecularly Detected Disease at the Time of Enrollment

"Morphologically evident disease (>5% blasts by cytomorphology)~Molecularly detected disease (disease detected with flow cytometry, cytogenetic, or mutational analysis if ≤ 5% blasts by cytomorphology)~Response will be assessed according to the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recommendations" (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: Through 12 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi)Morphologic leukemia free state (mLFS)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)
Molecularly Detected Disease2141
Morphologically Evident Disease3021

[back to top]

Percentage of Responding TP53 Mutated Patients (CR, CRi)

"Complete remission (CR) - Defined as bone marrow blasts <5%; absence of circulating blasts and blasts with Auer rods; absence of extramedullary disease; absolute neutrophil count >1.0 x 109/L (1,000/μL); platelet count >100 x 109/L (100,000/μL).~Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi): All CR criteria except for residual neutropenia - <1.0 x 109/L (1,000/μL) or thrombocytopenia -<100 x 109/L (100,000/μL)" (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine5

[back to top]

Overall Survival of Participants With TP53 Mutation

"Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from enrollment to death due to any cause. For a patient who is not known to be alive at the end of study follow up, observation of OS is censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive~To be evaluable for this outcome measure the participant would have to have received at least one dose of decitabine" (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Decitabine244

[back to top]

Median Time to Leukemia Relapse (TTLR) in Non-transplant Patients

-Recurrence/morphologic relapse - Defined as relapse following complete remission is defined as reappearance of blasts in the blood or the finding of ≥ 5% blasts in the bone marrow, not attributable to any other cause. New dysplastic changes is considered relapse. If there are no blasts in the peripheral blood and 5-20% blasts in the bone marrow, bone marrow biopsy should be repeated in > 1 week to confirm relapse. (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Decitabine308

[back to top]

Median Number of Hospital Stays

-Document number of hospital days that each participant stays and obtain median for all evaluable participants (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: During cycles 1 and 2 (60 days)

Interventiondays (Median)
Decitabine9

[back to top]

Average Number of Hospital Days

-Document number of hospital days that each participant stays and obtain average for all evaluable participants (NCT03063203)
Timeframe: During cycles 1 and 2 (60 days)

Interventiondays (Mean)
Decitabine10.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate was measured using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 to determine if the combination of decitabine and tetrahydrouridine is associated with a response rate which exceeds that of Pembrolizumab alone in participants who have programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of at least 50% and those who do not. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD) is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progressions. (NCT03233724)
Timeframe: Every 10 weeks (± 1 week) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or off study criteria is met. Longest participant on study 11 months.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseUnevaluable for response
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Every (q) Tuesday,Wednesday (TW) x 2 Weeks q3Weeks00112
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Monday-Tuesday (MT)00011
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Sunday, Monday, Tuesday (SuMT)00002

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0)

Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT03233724)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 2 months/10 days, 10 months/29 days, 20 months/30 days for the first, second and third group respectively.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Sunday, Monday, Tuesday (SuMT)2
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Monday-Tuesday (MT)2
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Every (q) Tuesday,Wednesday (TW) x 2 Weeks q3Weeks4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Dose Limiting Hematologic Toxicity (DLT)

A DLT is any Grade 3 (severe) or greater toxicity that cannot be attributed to a cause other than study treatment during the first two cycles of Course 1 of therapy such as disease progression or intercurrent illness. (NCT03233724)
Timeframe: First two cycles of Course 1 of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Sunday, Monday, Tuesday (SuMT)2
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Monday-Tuesday (MT)2
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Every (q) Tuesday,Wednesday (TW) x 2 Weeks q3Weeks1

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Tetrahydrouridine

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) is the maximum dose at which fewer than one-third of participants experience dose limiting toxicity (DLT) within the first 6 weeks (two cycles) of decitabine and tetrahydrouridine therapy. If one of three patients at any given dose level experiences DLT, up to three additional patients will be treated at this dose level. If only one of six patients exhibit DLT, subsequent patients will be enrolled into the next higher dose level. As soon as two patients at any given dose level develop DLT, no additional patients will be entered at that level. Subsequent patients will be accrued into the preceding dose level; if DLT is observed in less than two of six patients treated at this lower level, this dose will represent maximum tolerated dose (MTD). A DLT is any Grade 3 or greater toxicity that cannot be attributed to a cause other than study treatment during the first two cycles of Course 1 of therapy such as disease progression or intercurrent illness. (NCT03233724)
Timeframe: Within the first 6 weeks (two cycles)

Interventionmg/kg (Number)
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Sunday, Monday, Tuesday (SuMT)NA
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Monday-Tuesday (MT)NA
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Every (q) Tuesday,Wednesday (TW) x 2 Weeks q3WeeksNA

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Decitabine

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) is the maximum dose at which fewer than one-third of participants experience dose limiting toxicity (DLT) within the first 6 weeks (two cycles) of decitabine and tetrahydrouridine therapy. If one of three patients at any given dose level experiences DLT, up to three additional patients will be treated at this dose level. If only one of six patients exhibit DLT, subsequent patients will be enrolled into the next higher dose level. As soon as two patients at any given dose level develop DLT, no additional patients will be entered at that level. Subsequent patients will be accrued into the preceding dose level; if DLT is observed in less than two of six patients treated at this lower level, this dose will represent maximum tolerated dose (MTD). A DLT is any Grade 3 or greater toxicity that cannot be attributed to a cause other than study treatment during the first two cycles of Course 1 of therapy such as disease progression or intercurrent illness. (NCT03233724)
Timeframe: Within the first 6 weeks (two cycles)

Interventionmg/kg (Number)
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Sunday, Monday, Tuesday (SuMT)NA
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Monday-Tuesday (MT)NA
Decitabine 0.2mg/kg + Tetrahydrouridine 10mg/kg Every (q) Tuesday,Wednesday (TW) x 2 Weeks q3WeeksNA

[back to top]

Phase 2: Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR)

"Complete Response also includes Complete Response with Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi). Complete response is defined by the following criteria:~Morphologic leukemia-free state plus:~Subject is independent of transfusions~Absolute neutrophil count of >1000/mm3~Platelets of ≥100,000/mm3~Complete response with incomplete blood count recovery meets all criteria for CR except for either neutropenia (ANC <1000/mm3) or thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mm3) but must include transfusion independence." (NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Up to 27 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2: Onvansertib + Decitabine3

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for Onvansertib

(NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Days 1 and 5

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionHours (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Decitabine3.1022.438
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine1.9611.844
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Decitabine2.3651.583
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine2.5482.892
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Decitabine1.2883.145
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine2.3012.267
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Decitabine1.3733.161
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine1.3841.474
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine2.8933.161
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine2.0712.148
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 90 mg/m^2 + Decitabine2.4353.189
Phase 2: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine2.7252.665

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

ECOG performance status was determined using 6-point scale from 0-5, with 0 meaning a participant was fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction and 5 meaning the participant was deceased. (NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of study (approximately up to up to 27 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: Onvansertib + Low-dose Cytarabine11
Phase 1b: Onvansertib + Decitabine14
Phase 2: Onvansertib + Decitabine22

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)

Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as events related to onvansertib that were considered an adverse reaction or suspected adverse reaction during the first cycle of therapy and that fulfilled one of the following: Hematologic (persistent pancytopenia resistant to current standards of care that continues for ≥42 days and is not related to leukemic infiltration or another cause unrelated to study therapy) or Non-Hematologic (any Grade 3 abnormalities that persist >7 days without decreasing in severity despite standards of care, are clinically significant, or that are Grade 4 and symptomatic). (NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Up to Day 28 of Cycle 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Decitabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Decitabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Decitabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Decitabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine0
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 90 mg/m^2 + Decitabine2

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from enrollment until death from any cause and reported as the proportion of participants alive at 12 months. (NCT03303339)
Timeframe: 12 Months

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
Phase 2: Onvansertib + Decitabine0.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Any clinically significant change in electrocardiogram (ECG), physical examination findings, body weight, vital signs, and laboratory parameters were recorded as Adverse Events. (NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 27 months)

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any Adverse EventsAny Serious Adverse EventsAny Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Decitabine420
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine320
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Decitabine330
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine331
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Decitabine331
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine310
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Decitabine440
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine321
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine321
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine530
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 90 mg/m^2 + Decitabine653
Phase 2: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine32275

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Area Under the Curve Over the First 24 Hours AUC(0-24) for Onvansertib

(NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Days 1 and 5

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Decitabine1099.431868.69
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine1197.931868.69
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Decitabine2789.813626.44
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine772.683626.44
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Decitabine3257.575343.01
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine2534.225343.01
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Decitabine4084.187415.04
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine2761.117415.04
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine9599.1919470.17
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine5386.6919470.17
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 90 mg/m^2 + Decitabine9087.7712981.17
Phase 2: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine6280.2811767.29

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Onvansertib

(NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Days 1 and 5

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Decitabine80.15146.10
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine92.57139.22
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Decitabine129.18197.67
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine69.56103.27
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Decitabine309.86398.38
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine251.16298.63
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Decitabine410.42496.24
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine256.11339.52
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine724.76955.59
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine626.18857.29
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 90 mg/m^2 + Decitabine737.211137.16
Phase 2: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine515.63861.86

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) for Onvansertib

(NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Days 1 and 5

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionHours (Geometric Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 5
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Decitabine16.96013.282
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 12 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine11.29416.413
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Decitabine13.7959.082
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 18 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine7.99312.561
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Decitabine9.39410.713
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 27 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine12.19712.246
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Decitabine11.38916.337
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 40 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine11.7477.321
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine12.91744.018
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Low-dose Cytarabine7.30914.484
Phase 1b: Onvansertib 90 mg/m^2 + Decitabine12.63312.378
Phase 2: Onvansertib 60 mg/m^2 + Decitabine11.90414.060

[back to top]

Phase 2: Number of Participants With Partial Response (PR)

PR criteria includes all of the hematologic values for a CR but with a decrease of at least 50% in the percentage of blasts to 5% to 25% in the bone marrow aspirate and a normalization of blood counts. (NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Up to 27 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2: Onvansertib + Decitabine0

[back to top]

Phase 2: Number of Participants Who Achieved a Morphologic Leukemia-free (MLF) State

Defined as bone marrow (BM) <5% blasts in an aspirate with spicules and no blasts with Auer rods or persistence of extramedullary disease. (NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Up to 27 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2: Onvansertib + Decitabine1

[back to top]

Phase 2: Event-free Survival (EFS)

EFS is defined as the time from enrollment until disease progression or death from any cause and reported as the proportion of participants event free at 12 months. (NCT03303339)
Timeframe: 12 Months

InterventionProportion of Participants (Number)
Phase 2: Onvansertib + Decitabine0.1

[back to top]

Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)

Duration of Response (DOR) is the time (in months) from the first response of CR, CRi or PR until recurrence of or progression of disease (or death). MLF State is also included as a response when calculating DOR. Responding subjects without death or progression will be censored at the date of their last evaluable disease assessment. (NCT03303339)
Timeframe: Up to 27 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Onvansertib + Decitabine5.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

Assessment of safety of alvocidib administered in combination with either decitabine (DEC) or azacitidine (AZA) by reporting of adverse events and serious adverse events (NCT03593915)
Timeframe: From the time of first dose to 30 days after the last dose, an average of 33.7 weeks.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
ALV-DEC: Cohort 13
ALV-DEC: Cohort 23
ALV-DEC: Cohort 33
ALV-DEC: Cohort 44
ALV-AZA: Cohort 53
ALV-AZA: Cohort 64

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Post-baseline Transfusion Independence

The transfusion independence rate is defined as the percentage of participants with post-baseline transfusion independence, which is defined as a period of at least 56 days with no transfusion after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last dose of study drug, death, or initiation of post-treatment therapy, whichever is earliest. (NCT03941964)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug +30 days, or death, or initiation of post-treatment therapy, whichever occurred earliest. Median time on follow-up was 183.5 days and 195.0 days, respectively.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Red blood cells (RBC)PlateletsRBC and platelets
Venetoclax 400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg50.073.350.0
Venetoclax 400 mg + Decitabine 20 mg60.073.360.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CR + CRi)

"The composite complete remission rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) at any time during the study as assessed by the investigator. Response was based on bone marrow results and hematology values according to the modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria for AML:~CR: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 10^3/μL (1,000/μL), platelets > 10^5/μL (100,000/μL), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence, and bone marrow with < 5% blasts~CRi: Bone marrow with < 5% blasts, and absolute neutrophils of ≤ 10^3/μL or platelets ≤ 10^5/μL" (NCT03941964)
Timeframe: Assessed at Cycle 1 end, at Cycle 2 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 1 end, or Cycle 4 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 2 end. Median treatment duration of venetoclax was 16.1 wks (range 3.9-38.1) and 21.1 wks (range 2.7-40.4), respectively.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Venetoclax 400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg70.0
Venetoclax 400 mg + Decitabine 20 mg63.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR)

"The complete remission rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete remission (CR) at any time during the study as assessed by the investigator. Response was based on bone marrow results and hematology values according to the modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria for AML:~CR: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 10^3/μL (1,000/μL), platelets > 10^5/μL (100,000/μL), red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence, and bone marrow with < 5% blasts" (NCT03941964)
Timeframe: Assessed at Cycle 1 end, at Cycle 2 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 1 end, or Cycle 4 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 2 end. Median treatment duration of venetoclax was 16.1 wks (range 3.9-38.1) and 21.1 wks (range 2.7-40.4), respectively.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Venetoclax 400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg13.3
Venetoclax 400 mg + Decitabine 20 mg26.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)

"The complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) at any time during the study as assessed by the investigator. Response was based on bone marrow results and hematology values according to the modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria for AML:~CRi: Bone marrow with < 5% blasts, and absolute neutrophils of ≤ 10^3/μL or platelets ≤ 10^5/μL." (NCT03941964)
Timeframe: Assessed at Cycle 1 end, at Cycle 2 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 1 end, or Cycle 4 end if CR/CRi wasn't achieved at Cycle 2 end. Median treatment duration of venetoclax was 16.1 wks (range 3.9-38.1) and 21.1 wks (range 2.7-40.4), respectively.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Venetoclax 400 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg56.7
Venetoclax 400 mg + Decitabine 20 mg36.7

[back to top]

Relapse

Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI79

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Rate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants with PFS (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI14

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Rate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (aGVHD II-IV)

Percentage of Participants with Grade II-IV Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (aGVHD II-IV) (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 3 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI43

[back to top]

Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM)

Cumulative Incidence of Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM) (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI14

[back to top]

Relapse

Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI71

[back to top]

Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM)

Cumulative Incidence of Non-Relapse Mortality (NRM) (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI14

[back to top]

Efficacy of Combined Modality Treatment (Ruxolitinib, Decitabine, and DLI) for Relapsed AML or MDS Post Allo-HCT: Rate of Overall Survival (OS)

Rate of Overall Survival (OS) (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI14

[back to top]

Efficacy of Combined Modality Treatment (Ruxolitinib, Decitabine, and DLI) for Relapsed AML or MDS Post Allo-HCT: Rate of Overall Survival (OS)

Rate of Overall Survival (OS) (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI36

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR)

Rate of Complete Remission (CR) (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI7

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR)

Rate of Complete Remission (CR) (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI14

[back to top]

Best Response

Best response until next line of treatment, death, or last follow up, whichever occurs sooner (NCT04055844)
Timeframe: 1 Year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Decitabine + Ruxolitinib + DLI14

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Response

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT04146038)
Timeframe: During the first 2 cycles 56 days total

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Salsalate, Decitabine, Azacitidine, Venetoclax)1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events Incidence With of Salicylate + Venetoclax + Decitabine

Study drug associated adverse events during therapy (NCT04146038)
Timeframe: During the first 2 cycles, 56 days total

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Salsalate, Decitabine, Azacitidine, Venetoclax)1

[back to top]