Trial | Outcome |
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview] | Response Rate |
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview] | Grade ≥ 3 Stomatitis |
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview] | Minimal Residual Disease |
NCT00057811 (4) [back to overview] | Toxic Death |
NCT00066469 (1) [back to overview] | Event-free Survival |
NCT00097448 (1) [back to overview] | Hearing Improvement |
NCT00109928 (4) [back to overview] | 2-year Overall Survival Rate |
NCT00109928 (4) [back to overview] | 2-year Progression-free Survival Rate |
NCT00109928 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug |
NCT00109928 (4) [back to overview] | Response Rate |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | Duration of ICU Stays |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | Duration of Hospital Stay in Days |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | Development of Serum Creatinine Greater Than or Equal to 3.0 mg/dL After Study Entry |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With SAEs |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | The Proportion of Subjects Who Develop Death, PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Less Than or Equal to 55, Cardiac Index Less Than or Equal to 2.2, Pulseless Electrical Activity, Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Who Developed Refractory Shock Despite Fluid Resuscitation After Study Entry |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | Duration of Shock and/or Pressor/Inotropic Support |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | Length of Time on a Ventilator |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Intubated and Placed on a Ventilator After Study Entry. |
NCT00128180 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Participants on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) |
NCT00185692 (2) [back to overview] | Engraftment of Haploidentical CD34+ Selected Blood Stem Cells in Older Patients or Those With Medical Co-morbidities Following Total Lymphoid Irradiation and Antithymocyte Globulin Transplant Conditioning |
NCT00185692 (2) [back to overview] | Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Grade 2-4 Risk From Time of Transplant Until Day 90 Post-transplant |
NCT00186628 (4) [back to overview] | Incidence of Relapse |
NCT00186628 (4) [back to overview] | Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease (cGvHD) |
NCT00186628 (4) [back to overview] | Overall Survival |
NCT00186628 (4) [back to overview] | Mortality |
NCT00248534 (4) [back to overview] | 6-month Progression-free Survival |
NCT00248534 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Alive at 3 Years |
NCT00248534 (4) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response |
NCT00248534 (4) [back to overview] | 1 Year Overall Survival Rate |
NCT00257933 (1) [back to overview] | Time Measured From the Administration of the Loading Dose of Prednisolone (2mg/kg up to Max 60mg) in the Emergency Department (ED) Until the Home Dose of Albuterol is Administered |
NCT00278564 (1) [back to overview] | Survival |
NCT00290589 (3) [back to overview] | Numerical Rating Scale (0-10), an Interval Pain Scale, on Which 0 Indicates no Pain and 10 Indicates the Worst Pain Imaginable |
NCT00290589 (3) [back to overview] | Functional Disability Scales |
NCT00290589 (3) [back to overview] | Number of Patients Using Analgesics |
NCT00309907 (6) [back to overview] | Estimate Percentage Pulmonary Response in Patients With IPS Treated With Etanercept + Corticosteroid Therapy |
NCT00309907 (6) [back to overview] | Plasma Cytokine IL6 Level |
NCT00309907 (6) [back to overview] | C-reactive Protein Levels |
NCT00309907 (6) [back to overview] | Toxicity of Etanercept Plus Corticosteroid Therapy Using the Common Terminology Criteria Version 4.0 |
NCT00309907 (6) [back to overview] | Survival Rate |
NCT00309907 (6) [back to overview] | Response of IPS (Idiopathic Pneumonia Syndrome) to Etanercept Plus Corticosteroid Therapy by Day 28. |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 1 |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 14 |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 7 |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 1 |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 2 |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Treatment Success From Day 5 to Day 7 |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Participant's Quality of Life Using the Edmonton Scale |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Vomiting Episodes Per Day at Day1, Day 2 and Day 14 |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Treatment Success From Day 10 to Day 13 |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Relief From Obstruction at Day 7 and Day 14 |
NCT00332696 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 3 |
NCT00345046 (1) [back to overview] | Percent Change in Flare at Resolution |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) Who Were Disease-free and Alive at 12 Months |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) Who Were Disease-free and Alive at 6 Months |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Grade II-IV |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease at Grade III-IV |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) With Successful Natural Killer Cell Expansion |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) Who Experienced Relapse by 24 Months |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Patients Who Were Disease-free and Alive at 24 Months |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) Who Attained Neutrophil Engraftment |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Chimerism After Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant (UCBT) |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) Who Attained Platelet Engraftment |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) Who Died by 12 Months |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) Who Died by 24 Months |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) Who Died Due to Transplant. |
NCT00354172 (15) [back to overview] | Number of Participants (Patients) Who Experienced Relapse by 12 Months |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Number of Subjects Moving From the Severe Asthma to Mild Asthma Category |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Change in Mean Heart Rate |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Median Change in Asthma Score 2 Hours After Intervention |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Mean Change in Asthma Score at 2 Hours |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Serious Adverse Events |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Number of Subjects Moving From the Severe Asthma to Moderate Asthma Category |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Non-serious). |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Relapse / Readmission Numbers. |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Oxygen Saturation. |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Number of Subjects Remaining in the Severe Asthma Category |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Mean Change in Respiratory Rate. |
NCT00393367 (12) [back to overview] | Number of Patients Hospitalized |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Patients With Treatment Failure |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Duration of Exposure to Study Medication |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline in Overall Disease Activity With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline in Overall Disease Activity With Systematic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Cumulative Dose of Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroids (CS) |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Patients With Adverse Events and Infections |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Patients With Complete Remission |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Patients With Complete Remission |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Patients With Moderate to Severe Flares |
NCT00423098 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Patients With Partial Remission |
NCT00424489 (1) [back to overview] | Survival |
NCT00443430 (3) [back to overview] | Clinical Remission on Medication |
NCT00443430 (3) [back to overview] | Proportion of Participants Who Attain Inactive Disease by 6 Months |
NCT00443430 (3) [back to overview] | Safety Profiles, Including the Number of Treatment-emergent, Serious, or Unexpected Adverse Events and Other Important Medical Events |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Relapse Rate |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Overall Mortality Rate |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Median Time to Platelet Engraftment |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Median Time to Neutrophile Engraftment |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Incidence of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD) |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Event-free Survival (EFS) |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD) |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Achieving Full Donor Chimerism |
NCT00481832 (10) [back to overview] | Incidence of Chemotherapy-associated Pneumonitis |
NCT00492973 (5) [back to overview] | Amount of Pain Medication Taken Per Day |
NCT00492973 (5) [back to overview] | Length of Hospital Stay |
NCT00492973 (5) [back to overview] | Complications, Such as Infections, Hospital Readmissions, Manipulations Under Anesthesia, Etc. |
NCT00492973 (5) [back to overview] | Knee Society Scores |
NCT00492973 (5) [back to overview] | Knee Range of Motion |
NCT00493064 (1) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With An Improvement in Vision, as Measured by an Increase of 15 Letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) Vision Chart. |
NCT00521989 (1) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline to Day 98 Using the WOMAC Pain Question #1 |
NCT00551707 (2) [back to overview] | Percent Change From Baseline to Day 98 in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Values - As Treated Population |
NCT00551707 (2) [back to overview] | Absolute C-reactive Protein (CRP) Values at Day 98 - As Treated Population |
NCT00553202 (2) [back to overview] | Cumulative Incidence of NK Cell Reconstitution |
NCT00553202 (2) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT00555464 (2) [back to overview] | Response of Hemangioma (IH) to Treatment |
NCT00555464 (2) [back to overview] | Toxicity to Medications |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Patients Who Experienced Lestaurtinib-related Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm C at Dose Level 2 (DL2) |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Percent Probability of Event Free Survival (EFS) by MRD Status and Treatment Arm |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Pharmacodynamics PIA Levels in Infants Given Lestaurtinib at DL2 in Combination With Chemotherapy |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) of MLL-R Infants Treated With Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Lestaurtinib at DL2 |
NCT00557193 (10) [back to overview] | Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm A |
NCT00568633 (8) [back to overview] | Transplant-related Mortality |
NCT00568633 (8) [back to overview] | Early Graft Loss |
NCT00568633 (8) [back to overview] | Disease-free Survival (DFS) |
NCT00568633 (8) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT00568633 (8) [back to overview] | Relapse Rate |
NCT00568633 (8) [back to overview] | Patients Completing the Intended Therapy in Both Arms |
NCT00568633 (8) [back to overview] | Complete Donor Hematopoietic Cell Chimerism |
NCT00568633 (8) [back to overview] | Non-relapse Mortality |
NCT00577993 (2) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (10 Years) by Treatment |
NCT00577993 (2) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Overall Survival (10 Years) by Treatment |
NCT00595335 (8) [back to overview] | Graves' Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Score Using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Health Survey |
NCT00595335 (8) [back to overview] | Failure Rate |
NCT00595335 (8) [back to overview] | Change in Proptosis |
NCT00595335 (8) [back to overview] | Change in Lid Fissure |
NCT00595335 (8) [back to overview] | Failure Rate at One Year |
NCT00595335 (8) [back to overview] | Change in Clinical Activity Score (CAS) |
NCT00595335 (8) [back to overview] | Change in Extraocular Motility |
NCT00595335 (8) [back to overview] | Change in Disease Severity |
NCT00609609 (3) [back to overview] | Non-relapse Mortality (NRM) at 6 Months |
NCT00609609 (3) [back to overview] | Day 56 Treatment Success |
NCT00609609 (3) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Alive, In Remission & Without GVHD Progression Day 28 & Day 56 |
NCT00624416 (3) [back to overview] | The Average Percent Volume Reduction in the Lipoma. |
NCT00624416 (3) [back to overview] | The Number of Subjects Elected to Have the Lipoma Removed. |
NCT00624416 (3) [back to overview] | The Number of Lipoma Increased in Volume. |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Number of Tender Joints |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR 50) Response at Week 24 |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Number of Swollen Joints |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28 |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS-pain) |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response |
NCT00634933 (12) [back to overview] | Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity |
NCT00671658 (1) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With a Response |
NCT00682357 (4) [back to overview] | Change in Serum Osteocalcin |
NCT00682357 (4) [back to overview] | Change in Serum Cortisol |
NCT00682357 (4) [back to overview] | Change in Testosterone |
NCT00682357 (4) [back to overview] | Change in Serum Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Redness at Day 28 |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Redness at Day 7 |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Redness at Day 6 |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Itching at Day 28 |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Redness at Day 27 |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Redness at Baseline (Day 0) |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Itching at Day 7 |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Itching at Day 6 |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Itching at Day 27 |
NCT00689078 (10) [back to overview] | Ocular Itching at Baseline (Day 0) |
NCT00699803 (1) [back to overview] | Mean Aqueous Humor Prednisolone Acetate Concentration |
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview] | Overall EFS Rate for the Combined Cohort of Standard- and High-Risk Patients (Who Receive the Final Chosen Dose of Dasatinib) |
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview] | Percent of Patients MRD Positive (MRD > 0.01%) at End of Consolidation |
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview] | Feasibility and Toxicity of an Intensified Chemotherapeutic Regimen Incorporating Dasatinib for Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Ph+ ALL Assessed by Examining Adverse Events |
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview] | Event-Free Survival (EFS) of Patients With Standard-risk Disease Treated With Dasatinib in Combination With Intensified Chemotherapy |
NCT00720109 (5) [back to overview] | Contribution of Dasatinib on Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) After Induction Therapy |
NCT00732498 (4) [back to overview] | Overall Response Rate |
NCT00732498 (4) [back to overview] | Complete Response Rate |
NCT00732498 (4) [back to overview] | Median Time to Progression |
NCT00732498 (4) [back to overview] | Progression-free Survival at 1 Year |
NCT00733096 (4) [back to overview] | Numerical Rating Leg Pain Score |
NCT00733096 (4) [back to overview] | Global Perceived Effect |
NCT00733096 (4) [back to overview] | Medication Reduction |
NCT00733096 (4) [back to overview] | Oswestry Disability Score |
NCT00782717 (2) [back to overview] | Percent of Patients With a Decrease of More Than 5 Letters in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA). |
NCT00782717 (2) [back to overview] | Percent of Patients Who Developed Macular Edema (ME) Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery |
NCT00787722 (6) [back to overview] | Quality of Life (QOL) Short Form - 36 (SF-36) |
NCT00787722 (6) [back to overview] | Disability Score: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) |
NCT00787722 (6) [back to overview] | Survival |
NCT00787722 (6) [back to overview] | Post HSCT Immune -Modulating Medication and Relapse |
NCT00787722 (6) [back to overview] | NMO-IgG Aquaporin- 4 Autoantibody Titer |
NCT00787722 (6) [back to overview] | Number of Patients Who Require No Device Assistance for Ambulation |
NCT00792948 (3) [back to overview] | Relapse-free Survival (RFS) After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation |
NCT00792948 (3) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT00792948 (3) [back to overview] | Continuous Complete Remission (CCR) Rate |
NCT00802529 (3) [back to overview] | Vertigo Attacks |
NCT00802529 (3) [back to overview] | Change in Hearing |
NCT00802529 (3) [back to overview] | Change in Speech Discrimination |
NCT00806598 (1) [back to overview] | Overall Response |
NCT00807586 (3) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Arrhythmias at 6 Weeks |
NCT00807586 (3) [back to overview] | Repeat Intervention |
NCT00807586 (3) [back to overview] | Cardiac Pain Assessment |
NCT00854061 (1) [back to overview] | Means Aqueous Humor Prednisolone Acetate Concentration |
NCT00908583 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Patients Whose Cytotoxic Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) is Decreased by 50% |
NCT00908583 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Living Donor Transplant Candidates That Are Transplanted |
NCT00908583 (4) [back to overview] | Acute Rejection Rate |
NCT00908583 (4) [back to overview] | Overall Safety of Bortezomib |
NCT00915473 (4) [back to overview] | Mean Number of Days With Acute Medication Use |
NCT00915473 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Subjects With at Least 50% Reduction in the Frequency of Days With Moderate or Severe Migraine in the 4 Week Post Injection Compared to the 4 Week Pre-injection Baseline Period |
NCT00915473 (4) [back to overview] | Mean Frequency of Days With a Migraine |
NCT00915473 (4) [back to overview] | Mean Number of Hours With Moderate or Severe Migraine |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Mean Cumulative Prednisone Dose (mg/kg) Over 42 Days From the Start of Treatment |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Non-relapse Mortality |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Overall Survival |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Hyperglycemia |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Hypertension |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Invasive Infections (Bacterial, Fungal and Viral) |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Myopathy |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Quality of Life |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Progression to Grade III-IV Acute GVHD |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Recurrent or Progressive Malignancy |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Secondary Therapy for Acute GVHD Beyond Prednisone |
NCT00929695 (12) [back to overview] | Chronic Extensive GVHD |
NCT00929981 (7) [back to overview] | Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of Contact Dermatitis (CD) at the Second Follow-up Visit |
NCT00929981 (7) [back to overview] | Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the First Follow-up Visit |
NCT00929981 (7) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline in Participant-rated Pruritus Score at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up Visits |
NCT00929981 (7) [back to overview] | Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Final Follow-up Visit |
NCT00929981 (7) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline in Participant-rated Clinical Severity Score of Lesions at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up Visits |
NCT00929981 (7) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline in Investigator-rated Total Signs and Symptoms of CD Score at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up Visits |
NCT00929981 (7) [back to overview] | Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Third Follow-up Visit |
NCT00934843 (5) [back to overview] | Total Intake/Output of Fluid |
NCT00934843 (5) [back to overview] | Urine Output |
NCT00934843 (5) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Who Died Between 36 Hours and 30 Days Following Cardiac Surgery |
NCT00934843 (5) [back to overview] | Inotropic Score |
NCT00934843 (5) [back to overview] | Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) or Death at 36 Hours From Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) After Surgery. |
NCT00947765 (8) [back to overview] | Pain(at 6 Months): Nirschl Staging |
NCT00947765 (8) [back to overview] | Pain (at 1 Week): Visual Analogue Scale(0 to 10) |
NCT00947765 (8) [back to overview] | Pain(at 1 Week): Nirschl Staging (0 to 7) |
NCT00947765 (8) [back to overview] | Pain(at 12 Weeks): Nirschl Staging |
NCT00947765 (8) [back to overview] | Pain(at 12 Weeks): Visual Analogue Scale |
NCT00947765 (8) [back to overview] | Pain(at 4 Weeks): Nirschl Staging |
NCT00947765 (8) [back to overview] | Pain(at 4 Weeks): Visual Analogue Scale |
NCT00947765 (8) [back to overview] | Pain(at 6 Months): Visual Analogue Scale |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 2 |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Total Testosterone Measured Before Treatment on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Estradiol Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Estradiol Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 4 |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Low-Density Lipoproteins (LDL) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Insulin Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Insulin Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Insulin Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Cortisol Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) AFTER Exercise Protocol |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Very Low-Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Triglycerides Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Triglycerides Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Total Cholesterol Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Total Cholesterol Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Insulin Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | High-Density Lipoproteins (HDL) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | High-Density Lipoproteins (HDL) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Hematocrit Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Low-Density Lipoproteins (LDL) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Hematocrit Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Global Fatigue Score as Measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) in the Pre-treatment Week |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Global Fatigue Score as Measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) During the Treatment Week |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Very Low-Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Cortisol Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) BEFORE Exercise Protocol |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 7 |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 6 |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 5 |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 3 |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Cortisol Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) AFTER Exercise Protocol |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Cortisol Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) BEFORE Exercise Protocol |
NCT00957801 (40) [back to overview] | Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) |
NCT00968253 (3) [back to overview] | Participant Responses by Daily Dose Level Assignment (RAD001 5 mg, 10 mg and MTD 5 mg) |
NCT00968253 (3) [back to overview] | Overall Response Rate (OR) Where OR = CR + CRp + CRi |
NCT00968253 (3) [back to overview] | Maximum Tolerated Dose [MTD] Determination by Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) |
NCT00987831 (2) [back to overview] | Time to Flare Comparing Patients With (at Baseline) British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (BILAG) >/= 17 (Severe Disease) to Those With BILAG < 17 (Moderate Disease Activity). |
NCT00987831 (2) [back to overview] | Time to Flare Comparing Patients With Moderate vs Severe Disease Activity at Baseline |
NCT01000610 (4) [back to overview] | Change in Bone Density (in Participants Untreated With Bisphosphonates) |
NCT01000610 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) |
NCT01000610 (4) [back to overview] | Percentage Change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) From Baseline to Week 24 |
NCT01000610 (4) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Whose DAS28 Improved by >1.2 at Week 24 |
NCT01085097 (2) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) |
NCT01085097 (2) [back to overview] | Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 24 |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Recurrence or Relapse |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Overall Survival |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Overall Survival |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Recurrence or Relapse |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Overall Survival |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Toxicity Related to UCB Transplantation and Cytoreduction as Assessed by CTC v3.0 |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Transplant Related Mortality |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Transplant Related Mortality |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Disease Free |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Disease Free |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Incidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Occurrence of Serious Infections |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Incidence of Chronic GVHD |
NCT01093586 (14) [back to overview] | Hematologic Engraftment |
NCT01105650 (4) [back to overview] | Time to Disease Progression |
NCT01105650 (4) [back to overview] | Response Rate |
NCT01105650 (4) [back to overview] | Overall Survival |
NCT01105650 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Progressive Disease at One Year |
NCT01114503 (8) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC |
NCT01114503 (8) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Thyroid Function Assessment, Hormone and Glucose Assay Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC |
NCT01114503 (8) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Laboratory Urinalysis Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC |
NCT01114503 (8) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC |
NCT01114503 (8) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Laboratory Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) |
NCT01114503 (8) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC |
NCT01114503 (8) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With an Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Viral Load Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC |
NCT01114503 (8) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event (AE), Serious Adverse Event (SAE), or Drug-related Adverse Event |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Hypopyon |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Corneal Clarity |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Conjunctival Injection |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Anterior Chamber Cell Grade |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Lacrimation |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Photophobia |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Wound Integrity |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment Score of Postoperative Inflammation by Visit |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Percentage of Patients With an Anterior Cell Grade of 0 (no Cells) at Day 15 ± 2 Days |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Anterior Chamber Flare Grade |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Chemosis |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Ciliary/Limbal Injection |
NCT01124045 (13) [back to overview] | Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Vitritis |
NCT01144143 (5) [back to overview] | Change in Levels of Serum IL-6 |
NCT01144143 (5) [back to overview] | Change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Score Target Knee |
NCT01144143 (5) [back to overview] | Change in Joint Effusions From Day 0 to Day 56 Target Knee |
NCT01144143 (5) [back to overview] | Change in Serum CRP Day 0 to Day 56 |
NCT01144143 (5) [back to overview] | Change in Serum SAA Levels Day 0 to Day 56 |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Proportion of Subjects With Anterior Chamber Cell Count ≤5 and Flare Grade of 0 |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Slit-Lamp Total Sign Score at All Visits |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Anterior Chamber Flare Grade at All Time Points |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Proportion of Subjects With Anterior Chamber Cell Count of 0 |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Anterior Chamber Cell Grade at Day 14 |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Proportion of Subjects Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total Symptom Score at All Time Points |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Proportion of Subjects With Anterior Chamber Cell Grade of 0 |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Proportion of Subjects With Anterior Chamber Cell Grade ≤1 |
NCT01201798 (10) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Anterior Chamber Cell Grade at All Time Points Other Than Day 14 |
NCT01211665 (3) [back to overview] | Severity of AEs and SAEs |
NCT01211665 (3) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Who Survived at 6 Months Following Completion of Plasma Exchange (PLEX) |
NCT01211665 (3) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | DAS28-ESR During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | HAQ-DI During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Median GC Dose Taken During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Number of Erosions During the NonInterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (Anti-CCP) Antibody During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Positive for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Erosions During the NonInterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With LDA or Remission During the Interventional Phase Assessed Using CDAI |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With LDA or Remission During the Interventional Phase Assessed Using DAS28-CRP |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | SF-36 Subscale Scores During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Score (MCS) and Physical Component Score (PCS) During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | SJC and TJC During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Type of GC Taken at the End of the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | VAS for Pain (VAS-Pain) During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | VAS-Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (GDA) During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Median Dose of Tocilizumab During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Median Time Interval Between V1 and V2 |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Changes in Tocilizumab Dose During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With GC Switches During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Able to Acheive LDA Assessed Using DAS28 While Receiving Oral GC on Background Tocilizumab Treatment During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Able to Discontinue GCs During the Interventional Phase by V9 |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Able to Reduce Oral GCs by ≥50 Percent (%) During the Interventional Phase by V9 |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Able to Start the GC Reduction Phase at V3 |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Acheiving Remission Assessed Using DAS28 While Receiving Oral GC on Background TocilizumabTreatment During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants in the Interventional Phase Who Achieved LDA and Discontinued Oral GC Within 20 Weeks |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Changes in RA Treatment During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Time-Averaged GC Dose Changes During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | CDAI Score During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | DAS28-CRP During the Interventional Phase |
NCT01219933 (33) [back to overview] | DAS28-CRP During the Noninterventional Phase |
NCT01238536 (4) [back to overview] | Pain Numeric Rating Scale |
NCT01238536 (4) [back to overview] | Leg Pain NRS |
NCT01238536 (4) [back to overview] | Roland Morris |
NCT01238536 (4) [back to overview] | Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) |
NCT01267201 (4) [back to overview] | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) |
NCT01267201 (4) [back to overview] | Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] |
NCT01267201 (4) [back to overview] | Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2) |
NCT01267201 (4) [back to overview] | Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) |
NCT01272635 (5) [back to overview] | Urgent Care Visits, ED Visits and Hospitalizations |
NCT01272635 (5) [back to overview] | Progression to Clinically Significant Lower Respiratory Tract Symptoms |
NCT01272635 (5) [back to overview] | OCELOT: Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure |
NCT01272635 (5) [back to overview] | Drug Related Side Effects |
NCT01272635 (5) [back to overview] | Asthma Related Symptoms Among RTI Progressing to Severe LRTI |
NCT01283009 (1) [back to overview] | 60-day Mortality |
NCT01319981 (3) [back to overview] | Complete Response Duration |
NCT01319981 (3) [back to overview] | Number of Patients With Complete Remission at One Year |
NCT01319981 (3) [back to overview] | Overall Survival |
NCT01369745 (1) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at 12 Weeks |
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview] | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) |
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview] | Duration of Response |
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview] | Clinical Benefit Rate |
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview] | Overall Response Rate (ORR) |
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline in Serum Endocrine Biomarkers (Estradiol and Estrone) at End of Treatment |
NCT01381874 (7) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline in Serum Endocrine Biomarkers (Progesterone and Testosterone) at End of Treatment |
NCT01448213 (2) [back to overview] | Number of Eyes With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Elevation |
NCT01448213 (2) [back to overview] | Number of Eyes With Immunologic Graft Rejection Episodes |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Overall CR |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | Transplant Rate |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | 3-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | 3-Year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Probability |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | Induction Overall Response Rate (ORR) |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Achieving Induction Complete Response (CR) |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | Overall MRD Negative Rate |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Completing Only 2 Cycles of Part A Treatment |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Completing Part A Treatment |
NCT01465334 (11) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Grades 1-3 Hyperglycemia During Part A Induction |
NCT01475643 (2) [back to overview] | Anterior Chamber Cells & Flare |
NCT01475643 (2) [back to overview] | Anterior Chamber Inflammation |
NCT01496976 (4) [back to overview] | Rate of Progression/Relapse Free Survival (PFS) |
NCT01496976 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Partial Response (PR) |
NCT01496976 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT01496976 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR) |
NCT01497496 (1) [back to overview] | Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
NCT01534195 (4) [back to overview] | Conjunctival Redness Change From Baseline to Day 11 |
NCT01534195 (4) [back to overview] | Ocular Itching Change From Baseline to Day 11 |
NCT01534195 (4) [back to overview] | Episcleral Redness Change From Baseline to Day 6 |
NCT01534195 (4) [back to overview] | Ciliary Redness Change From Baseline to Day 6 |
NCT01559675 (1) [back to overview] | Orthostatic Hypotension |
NCT01579513 (5) [back to overview] | Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Post Cardiac Surgery. |
NCT01579513 (5) [back to overview] | Intensive Care Unit Stay |
NCT01579513 (5) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With a Clinically Derived Composite Morbidity-mortality Outcome |
NCT01579513 (5) [back to overview] | Neurodevelopmental Outcome |
NCT01579513 (5) [back to overview] | Hospital Stay |
NCT01652495 (3) [back to overview] | Reduction of Pain Severity Expressed as Percentage Change in VAS Score |
NCT01652495 (3) [back to overview] | Percentage of Patients With Suppression of Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal Axis |
NCT01652495 (3) [back to overview] | Functional Improvement Measured According to Percentage Change in Constant Score |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) Antibodies Over Time |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Score |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Time Required for Rituximab Administration (Subcutaneous [SC] or Intravenous [IV]) |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Progression-free Survival (PFS) |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) Over Rituximab Intravenously (IV) at Cycle 6 |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Event-free Survival (EFS) |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) Over Rituximab Intravenously (IV) at Cycle 8 |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Disease-free Survival (DFS) |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Complete Response (CR) Rate |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Summary of Observed Serum Rituximab Concentration |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Score |
NCT01724021 (14) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies Over Time |
NCT01730872 (3) [back to overview] | Inflammation Change From Baseline to Day 6 |
NCT01730872 (3) [back to overview] | Ocular Redness Change From Baseline to Day 6 |
NCT01730872 (3) [back to overview] | Ocular Itching Change From Baseline to Day 6 |
NCT01783847 (2) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +4 |
NCT01783847 (2) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline |
NCT01809132 (4) [back to overview] | MELD Score at 28 Days |
NCT01809132 (4) [back to overview] | MELD Score at 90 Days |
NCT01809132 (4) [back to overview] | MELD Score at 180 Days |
NCT01809132 (4) [back to overview] | 180 Days Mortality |
NCT01853072 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 14 and Maintained Through Day 90 |
NCT01853072 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Who Develop Macular Edema Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery (Day 0) |
NCT01853072 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With a > 5-letter Loss in BCVA From Day 7 to Any Visit [Time Frame: Day 7 up to Any Visit] |
NCT01853072 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 60 |
NCT01853072 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 90 |
NCT01853072 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With With a > 10-letter Loss in BCVA From Day 7 to Any Visit |
NCT01853696 (2) [back to overview] | Immunologic Graft Rejection Episode |
NCT01853696 (2) [back to overview] | Intraocular Pressure |
NCT01872611 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With a > 5-letter Loss in BCVA From Day 7 to Any Visit |
NCT01872611 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Who Develop Macular Edema Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery (Day 0) |
NCT01872611 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 90 |
NCT01872611 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 60 |
NCT01872611 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With With a > 10-letter Loss in BCVA From Day 7 to Any Visit |
NCT01872611 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 14 and Maintained Through Day 90 |
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview] | To Assess the Proportion of Patients Developing Grade I-IV Acute GvHD |
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview] | To Assess the Proportions of GvHD Response Post-administration of AP1903. |
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview] | To Assess the Incidence of GvHD Treatment Failure Post-administration of AP1903. |
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview] | To Evaluate the Safety of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Followed by Dimerizer Drug, AP1903 by Number of Participants With Adverse Events. |
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview] | To Assess the Incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus -PTLD or EBV Reactivation Requiring Therapy Post DLI. |
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview] | To Assess the Incidence of Acute GvHD Flare After CR/PR Requiring Additional Agent for Systemic Therapy Before Day 56 Post-administration of AP1903. |
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview] | To Assess Post Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) Chimerism |
NCT01875237 (8) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Assessed Post Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI): Disease-free Survival & Non-relapse Mortality, Chimerism and GVHD. |
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview] | Ocular Burning Sensation, Ocular Discharge, Ocular Redness, Ocular Itching, Foreign Body Sensation |
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview] | Visual Acuity |
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview] | Tear Film Break-Up Time |
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview] | Schirmer Tear Test (mm) |
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview] | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire |
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview] | Intraocular Pressure |
NCT01977781 (7) [back to overview] | Corneal Epitheliopathy (Corneal Fluorescein Staining Using the NEI Grading Scheme) |
NCT02006706 (2) [back to overview] | Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) |
NCT02006706 (2) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Week 24 |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | QALYS at 6 Months (Cross-walk Tariff) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | QALYS at 24 Months (Cross-walk Tariff) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | QALYS at 12 Months (Cross-walk Tariff) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | NHS Cost Differences at 6 Months (CC) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | NHS Cost Differences at 6 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | NHS Cost Differences at 24 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | NHS Cost Differences at 12 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity Over 24 Months: 6 Weeks |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity Over 24 Months: 6 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity Over 24 Months: 24 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity Over 24 Months: 12 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Weeks (PP) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Weeks (CC) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Weeks |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Months (PP) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Months (CC) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Months (CC) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Months (PP) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Weeks |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Weeks (CC) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Months (CC) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Months (PP) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (Complete Case Analysis (CC)) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (Per-Protocol Analysis (PP)) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (SG, Did Not Receive the Intervention of Their Preference) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (SG, Did Not State a Preference of Intervention) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (SG, Preferred Injection) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (SG, Preferred Splint) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (Subgroup Analysis (SG), Intervention of Their Preference) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations Over 24 Months: 12 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations Over 24 Months: 6 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Weeks (PP) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Weeks (CC) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Weeks |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Months (PP) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Months (CC) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Months |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations Over 24 Months: 6 Weeks |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Weeks (PP) |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Symptom Severity and Limitations in Hand Function as Assessed by the BCTQ 6 Weeks |
NCT02038452 (44) [back to overview] | Secondary: BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations Over 24 Months: 24 Months |
NCT02166463 (3) [back to overview] | Percentages of Patients Experiencing Grade 3+ Peripheral Neuropathy Assessed by Modified Balis Scale |
NCT02166463 (3) [back to overview] | Event Free Survival (EFS), Where Events Include Disease Progression or Relapse, Second Malignancy, or Death |
NCT02166463 (3) [back to overview] | Percentages of Patients With Early Response Defined as no Slow Responding Lesions (SRL) and no Progressive Disease (PD) at Any Disease Sites Determined by Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Per Deauville Criteria Through Central Review |
NCT02167217 (1) [back to overview] | Bayley III Gross Motor Scaled Score (Change From Baseline to 12 Month) |
NCT02176031 (6) [back to overview] | GVHD-free Survival Rate |
NCT02176031 (6) [back to overview] | Rate of GVHD Flares |
NCT02176031 (6) [back to overview] | GI aGVHD Response Rate |
NCT02176031 (6) [back to overview] | Graft-verus-host Disease (GVHD) Response Rate |
NCT02176031 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage Steroid Dose Was Reduced at Day 28, 56, and 100 in Comparison to Steroid Dose at First Administration of Natalizumab. |
NCT02176031 (6) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) Rate |
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Transplant-related Mortality (TRM) |
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure |
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment |
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS) |
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Transplant-related Morbidity |
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Malignant Relapse |
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview] | Number of Participants by Severity With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the First 100 Days After HCT |
NCT02199041 (9) [back to overview] | Number of Participants by Severity With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the First 100 Days After HCT |
NCT02242630 (2) [back to overview] | Change in Subject Reported Shoulder Pain as Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale |
NCT02242630 (2) [back to overview] | Change in Shoulder Function, as Measured by the QuickDASH ® |
NCT02256969 (4) [back to overview] | Tear Break Up Time (TBUT) |
NCT02256969 (4) [back to overview] | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) |
NCT02256969 (4) [back to overview] | Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) |
NCT02256969 (4) [back to overview] | Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS) |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Grade 4 Hypogammaglobulinemia by Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With B Cell Reconstitution at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With At Least One Grade 3 or Higher Infectious Adverse Event By Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With an Negative Anti-dsDNA Result at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Hypocomplementemic for Complement Component C4 at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Hypocomplementemic for Complement Component C3 at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Frequency of Specific Adverse Events of Interest By Participant, By Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Frequency of Specific Adverse Events of Interest By Event by Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure by Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 24 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 48 |
NCT02260934 (15) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Complete Response |
NCT02296346 (1) [back to overview] | Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Z-score and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) |
NCT02406209 (1) [back to overview] | Anterior Chamber Cell Grade at Week 8 |
NCT02464657 (4) [back to overview] | Relapse Free Survival |
NCT02464657 (4) [back to overview] | Event-Free Survival (EFS) |
NCT02464657 (4) [back to overview] | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Nivolumab |
NCT02464657 (4) [back to overview] | Overall Survival |
NCT02515045 (3) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) |
NCT02515045 (3) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Macular Thickness |
NCT02515045 (3) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Pachymetry (Corneal Thickness) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Fear Swallow) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Patients' Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale - Left Arm Pain |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Eating Duration) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Patients' Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale - Neck Pain |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Patients' Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale - Right Arm Pain |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Patients' Bazaz Dysphagia Score - Liquid |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Patients' Bazaz Dysphagia Score - Solid |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Food Selection) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Mental) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Sleep) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Burden) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Social) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Swallowing Difficulty Over 1 Year |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Patients' Neck Disability |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Eating Desire) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Communication) |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Adverse Event |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Fusion Rate |
NCT02539394 (19) [back to overview] | Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Fatigue) |
NCT02569437 (5) [back to overview] | Subjective Symptom Composite Scoring |
NCT02569437 (5) [back to overview] | Visual Analog Scale |
NCT02569437 (5) [back to overview] | Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score |
NCT02569437 (5) [back to overview] | Middle Meatus Culture |
NCT02569437 (5) [back to overview] | Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 22) |
NCT02576249 (3) [back to overview] | Pain Scale Score |
NCT02576249 (3) [back to overview] | Tegner Activity Level Scale |
NCT02576249 (3) [back to overview] | The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale |
NCT02652390 (6) [back to overview] | Palmar Pain Score |
NCT02652390 (6) [back to overview] | Number of Patients Who Have Had Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery on the Study Hand |
NCT02652390 (6) [back to overview] | Bodily Pain Score |
NCT02652390 (6) [back to overview] | 11-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score |
NCT02652390 (6) [back to overview] | Symptom Severity Score |
NCT02652390 (6) [back to overview] | Satisfaction Score |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Core Body Temperature in Degrees Celcius. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (%) Measured in Blood Samples Obtained Through a Central Venous Catheter Port. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Organ Failure-free Days. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Survival to Hospital Discharge With Favorable Functional Outcome. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Cerebral Blood Flow Index by Near Infrared Spectroscopy With Indocyanine Green. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Inflammatory Response as Assessed by Serum Cytokine Levels (pg/mL). |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Cardiac Output (L/Min) Measured by Either Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) or a Continuous Cardiac Output (CCO) Thermodilution Pulmonary Artery Catheter. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (%) Measured in Blood Samples Obtained Through a Central Venous Catheter Port. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Left and Right Ventricular Diastolic Area (cm^2) by Echocardiography. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Left and Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%) by Echocardiography. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Steroid-associated Complications. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Eccentricity Index by Echocardiography. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Cardiac Output (L/Min) Measured by Either Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) or a Continuous Cardiac Output (CCO) Thermodilution Pulmonary Artery Catheter. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (%) Measured in Blood Samples Obtained Through a Central Venous Catheter Port. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (%) Measured in Blood Samples Obtained Through a Central Venous Catheter Port (as Feasible). |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Cardiac Output (L/Min) Measured by Either Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) or a Continuous Cardiac Output (CCO) Thermodilution Pulmonary Artery Catheter. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring (as Feasible). |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Cardiac Output (L/Min) Measured by Either Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) or a Continuous Cardiac Output (CCO) Thermodilution Pulmonary Artery Catheter. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring. |
NCT02790788 (22) [back to overview] | Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring (as Feasible). |
NCT02798523 (1) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Sampled for RNA-seq Differential Expression Analysis (Biological Replicates) |
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview] | Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine |
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview] | Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine |
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview] | Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine |
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview] | Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R) |
NCT02828358 (5) [back to overview] | Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine |
NCT02847494 (3) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Sustained Headache Freedom |
NCT02847494 (3) [back to overview] | Headache Days as Self-reported by Participants |
NCT02847494 (3) [back to overview] | Medication Preference as Assessed by Self-report |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Nonrelapse Mortality (NRM) |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Relapse-related Mortality Rate |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Relapse Rate |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Three-month DOR |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Six-month Duration of Response (DOR) |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Failure-free Survival (FFS) |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Overall Response Rate (ORR) at Day 28 |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Overall Response Rate (ORR) |
NCT02953678 (10) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAES), Serious TEAEs, And Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Graft-versus-host Disease (GvHD)-Related Mortality - Percentage of Participants With an Event |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GvHD) |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Infection-related Mortality - Percentage of Participants With an Event |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-related AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Treatment-related SAEs and Temporally-associated AEs |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Transplant-related Mortality |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GvHD) Grading at Days 28, 56 and 180 |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Failure-free Survival - Percentage of Participants With an Event |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | All-cause Mortality - Percentage of Participants With an Event |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Graft-versus-host Disease (GvHD)-Free Survival - Percentage of Participants With an Event |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Systemic Clearance at Steady State (CLss) of GLASSIA |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Achieving Overall Response at Day 56 |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Achieving Overall Response (OR) At Day 28 |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | "Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to Time t AUC(0-t) of GLASSIA" |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of GLASSIA |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of GLASSIA |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Recurrence of Primary Malignancies |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Assessments |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GLASSIA |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC0-inf) From Time Zero to Infinity |
NCT02956122 (22) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants Achieving Gastrointestinal (GI) Response at Day 28 |
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview] | Number of Subjects With Adverse Events |
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview] | Percentage of Subjects With Prostate Specific Antigen - 50 Response |
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview] | Proportion of Subjects With Disease Progression |
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview] | Prostate Specific Antigen Levels |
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview] | Testosterone Complete Suppression |
NCT02962284 (6) [back to overview] | Testosterone Levels |
NCT03123614 (4) [back to overview] | Uncorrected Visual Acuity |
NCT03123614 (4) [back to overview] | Number of Eyes With Corneal Haze |
NCT03123614 (4) [back to overview] | Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3 |
NCT03123614 (4) [back to overview] | Best Corrected Visual Acuity at 3 Months |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Proportion of Subjects Who Discontinue Immunosuppressive Medications |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Cmax of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | AUC of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | CL/F of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Cmin of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Duration of Response |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Failure-free Survival |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Incidence Rate of aGVHD Flares |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Incidence Rate of Secondary Graft Failure |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Malignancy Relapse-related Mortality Rate |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events With INCB39110 |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Overall Response Rate Based on Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Response Index |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Overall Survival (OS) |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Relapse Rate of Malignant and Nonmalignant Hematologic Disease |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Time to Response |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Tmax of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Incidence Rate of cGVHD |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Nonrelapse Mortality |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Objective Response Rate |
NCT03139604 (20) [back to overview] | Proportion of Subjects Who Discontinue Corticosteroids |
NCT03229538 (7) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Mortality, Including In-hospital Mortality or Mortality After Hospital Discharge But Within 30 Days of the Last Dose of Study Drug |
NCT03229538 (7) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Death or Major Complication as Defined by an Outcome in One of the 7 Highest Global Ranking Categories |
NCT03229538 (7) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Any Other Post-operative Complications From the Start of Study Drug Administration Until Hospital Discharge. |
NCT03229538 (7) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With a Post-operative Length of Stay Greater Than 90 Days |
NCT03229538 (7) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation (Greater Than 7 Days) |
NCT03229538 (7) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Post-operative Low Cardiac Output Syndrome |
NCT03229538 (7) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Occurrence of Any One or More of the Following STS-CHSD-defined Major Post-operative Infectious Complications: Postprocedural Infective Endocarditis, Pneumonia, Sepsis, Deep Wound Infection, Mediastinitis. |
NCT03232749 (3) [back to overview] | Visual Analog Scale Scores at Each Time Point. |
NCT03232749 (3) [back to overview] | ASES Scores at Each Time Point |
NCT03232749 (3) [back to overview] | SST (Simple Shoulder Test) Scores at Each Time Point |
NCT03320434 (4) [back to overview] | Conjunctival Redness at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post CAC on Day 15 |
NCT03320434 (4) [back to overview] | Conjunctival Redness at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post CAC on Day 1 |
NCT03320434 (4) [back to overview] | Ocular Itching at 5, 7, and 10 Minutes Post CAC on Day 15 |
NCT03320434 (4) [back to overview] | Ocular Itching at 5, 7, and 10 Minutes Post CAC on Day 1 |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score to Measure Fatigue by at Week 8, 12 and 24 |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score to Measure Fatigue by at Week 8, 12 and 24 |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | 9 Hole Peg Test (9HPT) to Measure Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability and Cognitive Impairment |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | 9 Hole Peg Test (9HPT) to Measure Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability and Cognitive Impairment |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | 25-foot Timed Walk (25-FWT) to Measure Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability and Cognitive Impairment |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | 25-foot Timed Walk (25-FWT) to Measure Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability and Cognitive Impairment |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at Week 8 |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Symbol Digit Modalities Test to Measure Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability and Cognitive Impairment |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability Measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at Week 12 and 24 |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) Score to Measure Fatigue at Week 8, 12 and 24 |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Long Term Potentiation Measured by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) Score to Measure Fatigue at Week 8, 12 and 24 |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Low Contrast Letter Visual Acuity Test to Measure Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability and Cognitive Impairment |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Low Contrast Letter Visual Acuity Test to Measure Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability and Cognitive Impairment |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Long Term Potentiation Measured by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) |
NCT03387046 (16) [back to overview] | Symbol Digit Modalities Test to Measure Multiple Sclerosis Related Disability and Cognitive Impairment |
NCT03403517 (5) [back to overview] | Total Complication Rate |
NCT03403517 (5) [back to overview] | Mortality |
NCT03403517 (5) [back to overview] | Hospital Stay |
NCT03403517 (5) [back to overview] | Complications, Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) |
NCT03403517 (5) [back to overview] | PACU Stay |
NCT03578276 (3) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Pachymetry (Corneal Thickness) |
NCT03578276 (3) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Macular Thickness |
NCT03578276 (3) [back to overview] | Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) |
NCT03593902 (2) [back to overview] | Survival of Treatment |
NCT03593902 (2) [back to overview] | Change in Skin Score by mRSS |
NCT03704584 (3) [back to overview] | Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS-pain) Daily Until Post-injection Day 7 |
NCT03704584 (3) [back to overview] | 10 Point Likert Scale of Pain Scores Before the Injection and After the Injection and During Follow up in the Corticosteroid Plus Lidocaine Group as Compared to the Corticosteroid Alone Group |
NCT03704584 (3) [back to overview] | Number of Patients With Subsequent Reinjection and Surgical Operation |
NCT03797872 (1) [back to overview] | Number of Participants Who Are Eligible, Consent, and Complete the 48 Weeks Study |
NCT03818737 (6) [back to overview] | Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Total Score |
NCT03818737 (6) [back to overview] | Change in Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS-pain) Score |
NCT03818737 (6) [back to overview] | Change in EuroQuality of Life (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score |
NCT03818737 (6) [back to overview] | Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain Subscale Score |
NCT03818737 (6) [back to overview] | Overall MRI Grade of Osteoarthritis |
NCT03818737 (6) [back to overview] | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) Score |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Oxygen-free Days |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Cardiovascular Dysfunction |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Timely Initiation of Corticosteroids and Implementation of Biomarker-titrated Corticosteroid Dosing |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Organ Failure |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | ICU Admission |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Mortality |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Myocardial Injury |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Need for High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Need for Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | New Onset Cardiac Arrhythmias |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Occurrence of Delirium |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Occurrence of Hyperglycemia |
NCT03852537 (14) [back to overview] | Occurrence of Secondary Infection |
NCT04046549 (7) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Antibody-Mediated Rejection |
NCT04046549 (7) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) |
NCT04046549 (7) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Treated Acute Rejections |
NCT04046549 (7) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) |
NCT04046549 (7) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) of Grade 1A or Higher, Graft Loss or Death at Week 24 |
NCT04046549 (7) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR), Graft Loss, Death or Loss to Follow-up (LTFU) |
NCT04046549 (7) [back to overview] | Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) of Grade 1A or Higher, Graft Loss or Death at Weeks 12 and 48 |
NCT04184999 (1) [back to overview] | Evaluation of Intraoperative Use of Dexycu on Tear Film Osmolarity at 3 Weeks Postoperatively |
NCT04233164 (1) [back to overview] | Number of SLE Patients That Were Sampled for RNA-seq Differential Expression Analysis (Biological Replicates) |
NCT04323592 (6) [back to overview] | Admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) |
NCT04323592 (6) [back to overview] | Change in C-reactive Protein (CRP) |
NCT04323592 (6) [back to overview] | Composite Primary End-point: Admission to ICU, Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (MV), or All-cause Death by Day 28 |
NCT04323592 (6) [back to overview] | Endotracheal Intubation (Invasive Mechanical Ventilation) |
NCT04323592 (6) [back to overview] | Number of Days Free From Mechanical Ventilation |
NCT04323592 (6) [back to overview] | In-hospital Death Within 28 Days |
NCT04380857 (5) [back to overview] | Loss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual Acuity |
NCT04380857 (5) [back to overview] | Mean Change in Pain |
NCT04380857 (5) [back to overview] | Patient Preference Between Groups |
NCT04380857 (5) [back to overview] | Number of Lines Lost From Best Corrected Visual Acuity |
NCT04380857 (5) [back to overview] | Post op Pain Management Per Eye |
NCT04900220 (2) [back to overview] | Incidence of Pain |
NCT04900220 (2) [back to overview] | Intensity of Pain |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Number of Participants With Complications Following Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee 6 Weeks After Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee 6 Weeks After Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee 6 Weeks After Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Adverse Events or Outcomes Outside of Manipulations Under Anesthesia |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee After Surgery and Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Post Treatment Pain Scores (6 Weeks) |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee 6 Wks After Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Post Treatment Pain Scores |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Pre Treatment Pain Scores Using Knee Society Scores |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Post Treatment Pain Scores |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee Prior to Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee Prior to Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee After Surgery and Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Range of Motion in Degrees at Pre and Post Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures:(Immediate) Post Treatment Pain Scores |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee Before Treatment |
NCT05113901 (18) [back to overview] | Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee Before Treatment |
NCT05438277 (1) [back to overview] | Incidence of a Flare Reaction |
Response Rate
Response includes both complete and partial responses. Per protocol, complete Response is defined as the complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease by physical examination, by imaging studies, by bone marrow biopsy (where indicated), by CNS evaluation (where indicated) and by biopsy where there is a residual abnormality on an imaging study. Bone marrow must contain <5% blasts. CSF WBC must be <5/μL with no blasts or lymphomatous cells present. Partial response is defined as: at least a 50% reduction in the size of all measurable tumor areas. Each site is to be defined by the product of the maximum length, width and depth (3 dimensions). No lesion may progress. No new lesion may appear. Bone marrow must contain <5% blasts. CSF WBC must be <5/μL with no blasts or lymphomatous cells present.. (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.) | 88 |
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy) | 83 |
[back to top]
Grade ≥ 3 Stomatitis
The incidence of grade ≥ 3 stomatitis. Grade 3 stomatitis: Confluent ulcerations or pseudomembranes; bleeding with minor trauma. Grade 4 stomatitis: Tissue necrosis; Significant spontaneous bleeding; life-threatening consequences (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Incidence of grade ≥ 3 stomatitis | No incidence of grade ≥ 3 stomatitis |
---|
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.) | 4 | 41 |
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy) | 6 | 34 |
[back to top]
Minimal Residual Disease
The presence or absence of tumor cells at the end of induction assessed by studying tissue and/or blood/marrow. Details of methods and criteria used can be found in Shiramizu at al. BJH 153:758-763, 2011 (full citation in the citation section). (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Not Provided
Intervention | percentage of samples analyzed (Number) |
---|
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.) | 22 |
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy) | 70 |
[back to top]
Toxic Death
Implementation of the toxic death rate stopping rule, a death must be possibly, probably or definitely attributable to Rituximab and/or chemotherapy to be considered a toxic death. (NCT00057811)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Toxic death | No toxic death |
---|
Group B (Chemotherapy, Protective Therapy, Monoclonal Antib.) | 0 | 45 |
Group C (Chemotherapy, Monoclonal Antibody Therapy) | 2 | 38 |
[back to top]
Event-free Survival
Alive in continuous complete remission with functioning original allograft. The Event Free Survival (EFS) will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00066469)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | percentage of participants analyzed (Number) |
---|
Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone, Rituximab | 71 |
[back to top]
Hearing Improvement
Change from baseline to 2mos of 4-frequency (500, 1000, 2000, 4000Hz) pure tone average. (NCT00097448)
Timeframe: 2 months
Intervention | dB (Mean) |
---|
Oral Steroids | 30.7 |
IT Steroids | 28.7 |
[back to top]
2-year Overall Survival Rate
The overall survival rate is the percentage of patients who are alive 2 years after registration to the study. Overall survival is defined as the time between study registration and death due to any cause. (NCT00109928)
Timeframe: 0-2 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
PEGS | 31 |
[back to top]
2-year Progression-free Survival Rate
Progression-free survival rate is the percentage of patients who do not show signs of progression at 2 years after registration to the study, including those whose disease has either completely or partially responded to treatment, or those whose disease is stable. Progression-free survival is defined as the time between study registration and documented progression, or death if no progression was observed. (NCT00109928)
Timeframe: 0-2 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
PEGS | 12 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Response Rate
Complete Response(CR) is a complete disappearance of all disease with the exception of nodes. No new lesions. previously enlarged organs must have regressed and not be palpable. Bone marrow(BM) must be negative if positive at baseline. Normalization of markers. CR Unconfirmed (CRU) does not qualify for CR above, due to a residual nodal mass or an indeterminate BM. Partial Response(PR) is a 50% decrease in the sum of products of greatest diameters (SPD) for up to 6 identified dominant lesions, including spleenic and hepatic nodules from baseline. No new lesions and no increase in the size of liver, spleen or other nodes. (NCT00109928)
Timeframe: up to 3 years or time of disease progression
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Complete Response | Unconfirmed Complete Response | Partial Response | No Response |
---|
PEGS | 6 | 2 | 5 | 20 |
[back to top]
Duration of ICU Stays
(NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|
Active | 4.48 |
Placebo | 5.83 |
[back to top]
Duration of Hospital Stay in Days
Days (NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|
Active | 8.90 |
Placebo | 10.67 |
[back to top]
Development of Serum Creatinine Greater Than or Equal to 3.0 mg/dL After Study Entry
(NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Active | 1 |
Placebo | 6 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With SAEs
The Number of participants with SAEs (NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Active | 14 |
Placebo | 25 |
[back to top]
The Proportion of Subjects Who Develop Death, PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Less Than or Equal to 55, Cardiac Index Less Than or Equal to 2.2, Pulseless Electrical Activity, Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation
(NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | proportion of paticipants (Number) |
---|
Active | 0.27 |
Placebo | 0.47 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Who Developed Refractory Shock Despite Fluid Resuscitation After Study Entry
Refractory shock refers to shock that persists despite fluid resucitation. Fluid resusitation refers to administration of intravenous fluids to maintain blood pressure and cardiac output. (NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Active | 4 |
Placebo | 6 |
[back to top]
Duration of Shock and/or Pressor/Inotropic Support
Pressor/inotropic support refers to the use of adrenaline-like medications to maintain blood pressure and cardiac output. (NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|
Active | 2.67 |
Placebo | 3.75 |
[back to top]
Length of Time on a Ventilator
(NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|
Active | 2.64 |
Placebo | 4.95 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Intubated and Placed on a Ventilator After Study Entry.
Participants (NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Active | 6 |
Placebo | 10 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)
number of participants (NCT00128180)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Active | 0 |
Placebo | 0 |
[back to top]
Engraftment of Haploidentical CD34+ Selected Blood Stem Cells in Older Patients or Those With Medical Co-morbidities Following Total Lymphoid Irradiation and Antithymocyte Globulin Transplant Conditioning
number achieving donor cell engraftment (>95%) by day 90 after transplant. (NCT00185692)
Timeframe: 100 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Transplantation of CD34+ Cells | 4 |
[back to top]
Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Grade 2-4 Risk From Time of Transplant Until Day 90 Post-transplant
GVHD grading system goes from 0-4 where grade 4 is the most severe. Grade 0 and 1 do not require systemic treatment, Grade 2-4 require treatment. This trial evaluated the risk of developing acute GVHD grades 2-4 within 90 days of transplant. (NCT00185692)
Timeframe: 90 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Transplantation of CD34+ Cells | 1 |
[back to top]
Incidence of Relapse
Subjects who Relapsed following after Allogeneic HSCT (NCT00186628)
Timeframe: 4 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Prophylactic Rituximab | 18 |
[back to top]
Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease (cGvHD)
The cumulative percentage of participants who develop chronic graft-vs-host disease (cGvHD). Chronic cGvHD was defined as at least one instance of a clinically-accepted marker for cGvHD (see Filipovich, et al. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2005;11:945-955) (NCT00186628)
Timeframe: 4 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Prophylactic Rituximab | 20 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival
(NCT00186628)
Timeframe: 4 years
Intervention | Percentage of participants by disease (Number) |
---|
Prophylactic Rituximab (CLL Patients) | 73 |
Prophylactic Rituximab (MCL Patients) | 69 |
[back to top]
Mortality
Number of participants who died within 100 days and within 1 year, non-relapse and associated with relapse. (NCT00186628)
Timeframe: Day 100 and 1 year
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Mortality within 100 days, all causes | Nonrelapse mortality within 1 year | Relapse + mortality within 1 year |
---|
Prophylactic Rituximab | 0 | 1 | 2 |
[back to top]
6-month Progression-free Survival
"Scan at 6 months~Complete response: Complete disappearance of all tumor on MRI scan, off all glucocorticoids with stable or improving neurological exam minimum of 4 wks~Partial response: Greater than or equal 50% reduction in tumor size on MRI, on sable or decreasing glucocorticoids with stable or improving neurological exam for a minimum of 4 wks.~Progressive disease: Progressive neurological abnormalities not explained by other causes or greater than 25% increase in size of tumor or if new lesion.~Stable disease: Clinical status and MRI does not qualify for complete response, partial response or progression" (NCT00248534)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
IV Rituximab | 13 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Alive at 3 Years
The intent was to measure Median Overall Survival at 3 years, however only one participant was analyzable at this time point. Therefore, the number of participants who survived is reported instead. (NCT00248534)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
IV Rituximab | 1 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Objective response rate of the combination of Rituximab and TMZ (NCT00248534)
Timeframe: 2 months
Intervention | percent of participants (Number) |
---|
IV Rituximab | 14 |
[back to top]
1 Year Overall Survival Rate
(NCT00248534)
Timeframe: 1 year
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
IV Rituximab | 71 |
[back to top]
Time Measured From the Administration of the Loading Dose of Prednisolone (2mg/kg up to Max 60mg) in the Emergency Department (ED) Until the Home Dose of Albuterol is Administered
(NCT00257933)
Timeframe: Median time from loading dose to home dose of albuterol
Intervention | Hours (Median) |
---|
High Dose Prednisolone | 35 |
Lower Dose Prednisolone | 33 |
[back to top]
Survival
Survival (NCT00278564)
Timeframe: up to 5 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 7 |
[back to top]
Numerical Rating Scale (0-10), an Interval Pain Scale, on Which 0 Indicates no Pain and 10 Indicates the Worst Pain Imaginable
Improvement in Numerical Rating Scale between the time of the emergency department visit and the one month telephone call is rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0-10 with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worse pain imaginable. (NCT00290589)
Timeframe: 1 month
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Intramuscular Methylprednisolone Acetate | 7.1 |
Placebo | 5.8 |
[back to top]
Functional Disability Scales
The low back pain functional disability scale is the Roland Morris Disability questionnaire score (RMDQ). The RMDQ is a 24-item low back pain functional scale recommended for use in low back pain research.Higher scores signify greater low back-related functional impairment.0= no functional impairment, 24= severe functional impairment. (NCT00290589)
Timeframe: 1 month
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|
Intramuscular Methylprednisolone Acetate | 0 |
Placebo | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients Using Analgesics
Use of analgesics for low back pain (within the previous 24 hours) (NCT00290589)
Timeframe: Assessed at 1 month
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Intramuscular Methylprednisolone Acetate | 8 |
Placebo | 17 |
[back to top]
Estimate Percentage Pulmonary Response in Patients With IPS Treated With Etanercept + Corticosteroid Therapy
Pulmonary response is defined as alive & come off of oxygen . (NCT00309907)
Timeframe: up to day 56
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Etanercept and Corticosteroid Therapy | 74 |
[back to top]
Plasma Cytokine IL6 Level
Estimated mean and standard error of IL6 level (NCT00309907)
Timeframe: From baseline to days 7 and 28
Intervention | pg/ml (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Day 7 | Day 28 |
---|
Etanercept and Corticosteroid Therapy | 205.2 | 28.8 | 23.1 |
[back to top]
C-reactive Protein Levels
Estimated mean and standard deviation (NCT00309907)
Timeframe: From baseline to days 7, 14, 21, and 28
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Day 7 Non Responders | Day 7 Responders | Day 14 Non Responders | Day 14 Responders | Day 21 Non Responders | Day 21 Responders | Day 28 Non Responders | Day 28 Responders |
---|
Etanercept and Corticosteroid Therapy | 28.1 | 5.4 | 1.8 | 4.9 | 1 | 10.7 | 1.6 | 19.6 | 5.3 |
[back to top]
Toxicity of Etanercept Plus Corticosteroid Therapy Using the Common Terminology Criteria Version 4.0
Grade 3-5 organ toxicities attributable to etanercept. (NCT00309907)
Timeframe: Up to 56 days
Intervention | Patients (Number) |
---|
Etanercept and Corticosteroid Therapy | 0 |
[back to top]
Survival Rate
Estimated Day 56 survival rate following initiation of etanercept + corticosteroid therapy for patients with IPS. (NCT00309907)
Timeframe: Up to day 56
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Etanercept and Corticosteroid Therapy | 75 |
[back to top]
Response of IPS (Idiopathic Pneumonia Syndrome) to Etanercept Plus Corticosteroid Therapy by Day 28.
Response to therapy is defined as survival to Day 28 of study, PLUS complete discontinuation all supplemental oxygen support by Day 28 of study. Subjects must be able to remain off all supplemental oxygen support for > 72 consecutive hours. Subjects who discontinue supplemental oxygen within the last 72 hours of the observation period will be followed until they have completed 72 consecutive hours off oxygen or failed prior to assessing response. (NCT00309907)
Timeframe: At day 28
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| With Response | Without Response |
---|
Etanercept and Corticosteroid Therapy | 20 | 8 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 1
Participants rated their nausea intensity on a scale of 0 to 3, with 3 being the worse. The number of participants with a score of 0, a score of 1, a score of 2 and a score of 3 are presented for Day 1. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 1
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Score=0 | Score=1 | Score=2 | Score=3 |
---|
Octreotide | 16 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Placebo | 13 | 2 | 9 | 8 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 14
Participants rated their nausea intensity on a scale of 0 to 3, with 3 being the worse. The number of participants with a score of 0, a score of 1, a score of 2 and a score of 3 are presented for Day 14. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 14
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Score=0 | Score=1 | Score=2 | Score=3 |
---|
Octreotide | 22 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Placebo | 22 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Reporting Scores 0 to 3 on the Nausea Intensity World Heath Organization (WHO) Scale at Day 7
Participants rated their nausea intensity on a scale of 0 to 3, with 3 being the worse. The number of participants with a score of 0, a score of 1, a score of 2 and a score of 3 are presented for Day 7. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 7
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Score=0 | Score=1 | Score=2 | Score=3 |
---|
Octreotide | 21 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
Placebo | 15 | 9 | 6 | 1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 1
Recurrence of bowel obstruction was confirmed by abdominal X-ray. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: 1 Month
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Recurrence at Month 1 | No Recurrence at Month 1 |
---|
Octreotide | 1 | 13 |
Placebo | 2 | 13 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 2
Recurrence of bowel obstruction was confirmed by abdominal X-ray. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Month 2
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Recurrence at Month 2 | No Recurrence at Month 2 |
---|
Octreotide | 2 | 6 |
Placebo | 2 | 5 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Treatment Success From Day 5 to Day 7
Day 7 treatment success was defined as improvement of symptoms in the previous 2 days (average number of vomiting episodes less than 2 from Day 5, no Nasogastric Tube (NGT) since Day 5 and no anticholinergic agent or withdrawal from trial). (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 5 to Day 7
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| TREATMENT SUCCESS | Vomiting episodes <2 (per day) since Day 5 | Vomiting episodes ≥2 (per day) since Day 5 | No Nasogastric Tube since Day 5 | Nasogastric Tube used since Day 5 | No Anticholinergic agents | Anticholinergic agents taken | Premature discontinuation/missing data |
---|
Octreotide | 22 | 28 | 1 | 22 | 7 | 26 | 3 | 3 |
Placebo | 20 | 25 | 2 | 24 | 3 | 25 | 2 | 5 |
[back to top]
Participant's Quality of Life Using the Edmonton Scale
The Edmonton Scale consisted of 9 items: pain, activity, nausea, depression, anxiety, fatigue, appetite, sensation of well-being and dyspnea (difficult or labored breathing). Participants rated these items on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the worse. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7, Day 14, Month 1, Month 2 and Month 3
,
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Day 1 (n=30,29) | Day 7 (n=24,26) | Day 14 (n=20,14) | Month 1 (n=11,13) | Month 2 (n=7,4) | Month 3 (n=2,2) |
---|
Octreotide | 4.12 | 4.23 | 4.30 | 4.18 | 3.46 | 0.05 |
Placebo | 4.12 | 3.37 | 3.85 | 4.49 | 3.23 | 1.60 |
[back to top]
Number of Vomiting Episodes Per Day at Day1, Day 2 and Day 14
The mean number of vomiting episodes per a 24 hour period is presented for Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 7 and Day 14
,
Intervention | Vomiting episodes (Mean) |
---|
| Day 1 | Day 7 (n=31,31) | Day 14 (n=28,27) |
---|
Octreotide | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
Placebo | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Treatment Success From Day 10 to Day 13
"Treatment Success was defined as: less than 2 episodes of vomiting on average per day for the 4 days prior to Day 14 [from Day 10 to Day 13] and no use of an Nasogastric Tube (NGT) since at least Day 10 and no use of an anticholinergic agent until Day 14.~Treatment Failure is defined as: 2 or more episodes of vomiting per day on average for the 4 days prior to Day 14 or use of an NGT after Day 9 or use of an anticholinergic agent before Day 14 or withdrawal from the trial between Day 1 and Day 14 (included), whatever the cause." (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 10 to Day 13
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| TREATMENT SUCCESS | Vomiting episodes <2 (per day) | Vomiting episodes ≥2 (per day) | No Nasogastric Tube since Day 10 | Nasogastric Tube used since Day 10 | No Anticholinergic agents | Anticholinergic agents taken | Premature discontinuation/missing data, failure |
---|
Octreotide | 12 | 19 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 18 | 3 | 11 |
Placebo | 9 | 13 | 2 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 4 | 17 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Relief From Obstruction at Day 7 and Day 14
Relief from obstruction is defined by combining restart of stools for at least the previous 3 days, less than 2 episodes of vomiting on average for the previous 4 days and the restarting of flatus (gas generated in the stomach or bowels) for at least the previous 12 hours. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Day 7 and Day 14
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Relief from Obstruction: Day 7 | No Relief from Obstruction: Day 7 | Relief from Obstruction: Day 14 | No Relief from Obstruction: Day 14 |
---|
Octreotide | 9 | 20 | 11 | 10 |
Placebo | 15 | 12 | 10 | 5 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Recurrence of an Episode of Bowel Obstruction at Month 3
Recurrence of bowel obstruction was confirmed by abdominal X-ray. (NCT00332696)
Timeframe: Month 3
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Recurrence at Month 3 | No Recurrence at Month 3 |
---|
Octreotide | 0 | 3 |
Placebo | 0 | 2 |
[back to top]
Percent Change in Flare at Resolution
(NCT00345046)
Timeframe: 2 months
Intervention | Percent change in flare (Mean) |
---|
Pred Forte 1% | 64.8 |
Econo Pred Plus 1% | 68.3 |
Predisolone Acetate 1% | 65.7 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) Who Were Disease-free and Alive at 12 Months
Number of patients who were alive and free of disease (malignancy) at 12 months after transplant. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 12 Months Post transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) Who Were Disease-free and Alive at 6 Months
Number of patients who were alive and free of disease (malignancy) at 6 months after transplant. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 6 Months Post Transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 2 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) With Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Grade II-IV
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of transplantation in which functional immune cells in the transplanted marrow recognize the recipient as foreign and mount an immunologic attack. The acute or fulminant form of the disease (aGVHD) is normally observed within the first 100 days post-transplant, and is a major challenge to transplants owing to associated morbidity and mortality. Acute GVHD is staged as follows: overall grade (skin-liver-gut) with each organ staged individually from a low of I to a high of IV. Patients with grade IV GVHD usually have a poor prognosis. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: Day 100 Post Transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 6 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) With Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease at Grade III-IV
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of transplantation in which functional immune cells in the transplanted marrow recognize the recipient as foreign and mount an immunologic attack. The acute or fulminant form of the disease (aGVHD) is normally observed within the first 100 days post-transplant, and is a major challenge to transplants owing to associated morbidity and mortality. Acute GVHD is staged as follows: overall grade (skin-liver-gut) with each organ staged individually from a low of I to a high of IV. Patients with grade IV GVHD usually have a poor prognosis. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: Day 100 post transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
The chronic form of graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD) normally occurs after 100 days. The appearance of moderate to severe cases of cGVHD adversely influences long-term survival. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: Day 100 through 1 Year Post Transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) With Successful Natural Killer Cell Expansion
Defined by an absolute circulating donor-derived natural killer cell count of >100 cells/microliter 10-13 days after infusion with <5% donor T and B cells in the mononuclear population (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 10-13 Days Post Infusion
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 3 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) Who Experienced Relapse by 24 Months
Number of patients who experienced recurrence or progression of disease from the time of transplant. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 2 Years Post transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 11 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients Who Were Disease-free and Alive at 24 Months
Number of patients who were alive and free of disease (malignancy) at 24 months after transplant. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 24 Months Post transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) Who Attained Neutrophil Engraftment
"Defined as absolute neutrophils (ANC) > 5 x 10^8/Liter for 3 consecutive days.~ANC is the real number of white blood cells (WBCs) that are neutrophils. The absolute neutrophil count is commonly called the ANC. The ANC is not measured directly. It is derived by multiplying the WBC count times the percent of neutrophils in the differential WBC count. The percent of neutrophils consists of the segmented (fully mature) neutrophils) + the bands (almost mature neutrophils). The normal range for the ANC = 1.5 to 8.0 (1,500 to 8,000/mm3)." (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: Day 42 Post Transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 13 |
[back to top]
Chimerism After Double Umbilical Cord Blood Transplant (UCBT)
Calculation of Median (range) of percentage of donor cells engrafted (present) in the recipient (patient). (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: Day 21, Day 100, 6 Months
Intervention | Percentage of Engrafted Cells (Median) |
---|
| Day 21 | Day 100 | 6 Months |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 92 | 100 | 96.5 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) Who Attained Platelet Engraftment
Platelet engraftment is defined as platelet counts > 50 x 10^9/Liter for 3 consecutive days. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post Transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 5 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) Who Died by 12 Months
Number of patients who died after receiving treatment within 12 months post transplant. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 1 year Post Transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 14 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) Who Died by 24 Months
Number of patients who died after receiving treatment within 24 months post transplant. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 15 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) Who Died Due to Transplant.
Patients who had transplant-related mortality (TRM). TRM = adverse event(s) that occur(s) after the patient has received a transplant, the principal investigator decides it is related to the procedure and the patient dies within 6 months. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 6 Months Post Transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 4 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants (Patients) Who Experienced Relapse by 12 Months
Number of patients who experienced recurrence or progression of disease from the time of transplant. (NCT00354172)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post Transplant
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Evaluable Patients | 10 |
[back to top]
Number of Subjects Moving From the Severe Asthma to Mild Asthma Category
Of the patients who presented in the severe asthma category (Asthma Severity score of 12-15), those who moved to the mild category (Asthma Severity score 5-7) 2 hours after the budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: From the initial score to 2 hours after intervention with budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | 8 |
Placebo (Normal Saline) | 10 |
[back to top]
Change in Mean Heart Rate
Mean of heart rate in beats per minute before treatment minus mean of heart rate 2 hours after treatment with either budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: From the initial heart rate to heart rate 2 hours after intervention with budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator
Intervention | Beats per minute (Mean) |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | 12 |
Placebo (Normal Saline) | 13 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Mean Change in Asthma Score at 2 Hours
The scale used is the Asthma Score published by Qureshi et al. The Asthma Score ranges from a low of 5 to maximum of 15 points. One to 3 points are given for each of 5 categories: age-based respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, wheeze, retractions, and dyspnea. For category detalails, please see the Qureshi reference. Scores of 5-7 are considered mild, 8-11 moderate, and 12-15 severe. Asthma Scores are recorded prior to any intervention and at 2 hours after budesonide inhalation suspension/albuterol intervention or saline placebo/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: Initial asthma score minus score 2 hours after budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline placebo/albuterol comparator
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | -2.9 |
Placebo (Normal Saline) | -3.0 |
[back to top]
Serious Adverse Events
Serious Adverse Events (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: 0-5 days
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Return within 5 days with hosptial admission | Increased level of care |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | 2 | 1 |
Placebo (Saline) | 2 | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Subjects Moving From the Severe Asthma to Moderate Asthma Category
Of the patients who presented in the severe asthma category (Asthma Severity score of 12-15), those who moved to the moderate category (Asthma Severity score 8-11) 2 hours after the budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: From the initial score to 2 hours after intervention with budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | 22 |
Placebo (Normal Saline) | 11 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Non-serious).
(NCT00393367)
Timeframe: within 30 days of the ED visit
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Rhinorrhea | Headache | Diarrhea | Sore throat | Cough | Hyperglycemia |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Placebo (Normal Saline) | 11 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
[back to top]
Relapse / Readmission Numbers.
Participants admitted to the hospital within 5 days of the ED visit (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: within 5 days of ED visit
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | 2 |
Placebo (Normal Saline) | 2 |
[back to top]
Oxygen Saturation.
Mean oxygen saturation (non-invasive pulse-oximetry, % hemoglobin saturation) 2 hours after treatment with either budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator minus mean oxygen saturation before treatment. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: 2 hours after treatment with either budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator
Intervention | Percent Hemoglobin Saturation (Mean) |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | 1.0 |
Placebo (Normal Saline) | 1.0 |
[back to top]
Number of Subjects Remaining in the Severe Asthma Category
Of the patients who presented in the severe asthma category (Asthma Severity score of 12-15), those who remained in this category 2 hours after the budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: From the initial score to 2 hours after intervention with budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | 4 |
Placebo (Normal Saline) | 4 |
[back to top]
Mean Change in Respiratory Rate.
Mean respiratory rate in breaths per minute before treatment minus respiratory rate 2 hours after treatment with either budesonide/albuterol or saline/albuterol comparator. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: Initial rate, minus rate taken 2 hours after budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator
Intervention | Breaths per minute (Mean) |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | -6 |
Placebo (Normal Saline) | -6 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients Hospitalized
The number of patients requiring hospital admission 4 hours after budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol comparator. All hospitalization decisions are made at the discretion of the attending physician. (NCT00393367)
Timeframe: within 4 hours after the budesonide/albuterol intervention or saline/albuterol placebo
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Budesonide Inhalation Suspension (BIS) | 56 |
Placebo (Saline) | 55 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients With Treatment Failure
Treatment failure was defined as no therapeutic response (without complete or partial remission) or premature discontinuation during the first 24 weeks from study medication or the study for any reason except complete or partial remission. (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| At 12 weeks - Yes | At 12 weeks - No | At 24 weeks - Yes | At 24 weeks - No |
---|
Low Dose | 25 | 14 | 22 | 17 |
Standard Dose | 23 | 19 | 21 | 21 |
[back to top]
Duration of Exposure to Study Medication
The duration of exposure was calculated as the date of the last Mycophenolate sodium dose minus the date of the last Mycophenolate sodium dose +1. (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: 24 weeks
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|
Standard Dose | 164.5 |
Low Dose | 157.7 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline in Overall Disease Activity With British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)
BILAG (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group) index divides lupus activity into 8 organs/systems and was based on the principle of the physician's intention to treat, assessing activity in the previous one month. Each organ or system was given a score of A to E, where A = disease that is sufficiently active to require disease modifying treatment; a B = problems requiring symptomatic treatment; C = stable mild disease; D = previously affected but currently inactive system; and E = the system or organ has never been involved. [A=9, B=3, C=1, D/E=0 the score range for each patient will be 0-72]. (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: From Baseline to week 4, week 12 and week 24
,
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Change from baseline Week 4: (N= 40, 37) | Change from baseline Week 12: (N= 41, 35) | Change from baseline Week 24: (N= 40, 34) |
---|
Low Dose | -5.5 | -8.7 | -9.4 |
Standard Dose | -4.8 | -8.6 | -8.6 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline in Overall Disease Activity With Systematic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)
SLEDAI stands for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and was a well established global score index based on assessment of 24 items measuring a disease activity in the 10-day period prior to the assessment. SLEDAI item weights range from 1 for fever to 8 for seizures. A maximum theoretical score is 105. Total score range from 1 to 105. A flare has been defined as a SLEDAI score increase of 3 or more to a level of 8 or higher. During flares SLEDAI scores of 25 to 30 are common. (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: From Baseline to week 4, week 12 and week 24
,
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Change from Baseline to Week 4: (N= 39, 37) | Change from Baseline to Week 12: (N= 41, 35) | Change from Baseline to Week 24: (N= 39, 34) |
---|
Low Dose | -7.7 | -10.3 | -9.8 |
Standard Dose | -7.4 | -9.7 | -10.3 |
[back to top]
Cumulative Dose of Prednisone Equivalent Corticosteroids (CS)
Corticosteroid use was measured as cumulative dose until 12 and 24 weeks of treatment as well as daily doses at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks and 24 Weeks
,
Intervention | mg/kg (Mean) |
---|
| Week 12 | Week 24 |
---|
Low Dose | 68.2 | 73.0 |
Standard Dose | 106.1 | 114.2 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients With Adverse Events and Infections
Safety assessments included collecting all adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), with their severity and relationship to study drug. According to FDA 21CFR 314.80, a serious adverse event (SAE) is described as any adverse event that leads to death, is life threatening ( NIH criteria Grade 4), causes or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, or any other important medical event not described above. (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: 24 weeks
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| At least one adverse event | Any severe adverse event | Any drug related adverse event | Any serious adverse event | Any infection | Any severe infection | Any drug related infection | Any serious infection |
---|
Low Dose | 30 | 3 | 16 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
Standard Dose | 35 | 7 | 18 | 8 | 25 | 3 | 10 | 4 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients With Complete Remission
Complete remission was defined as urine protein/urine creatinine ratio < 0.5 gram urine protein per gram urine creatinine, urine sediment normalized (no cellular casts, < 5 red cells per high power field), and serum creatinine within 10% of normal range according to local lab. (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: 24 Weeks
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Yes | No |
---|
Low Dose | 8 | 31 |
Standard Dose | 8 | 34 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients With Complete Remission
Complete remission was defined as urine protein/urine creatinine ratio < 0.5 gram urine protein per gram urine creatinine, urine sediment normalized (no cellular casts, < 5 red cells per high power field), and serum creatinine within 10% of normal value. (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Yes | No |
---|
Low Dose | 5 | 34 |
Standard Dose | 9 | 33 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients With Moderate to Severe Flares
A moderate to severe flare was defined as the occurrence of increased lupus activity after partial or complete remission, based on the presence of 1 BILAG A score or >=3 BILAG B scores. British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index divides lupus activity in 8 organs/systems which are each given a score of A to E. A=disease sufficiently active to need disease modifying treatment; B=problems requiring symptomatic treatment; C=mild stable disease; D=previously affected but currently inactive system; E=the system or organ has never been involved. BILAG score: A=9, B=3, C=1, D/E=0; range(0-72) (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| At week 12 - Yes | At week 12 - No | At week 24 - Yes | At week 24 - No |
---|
Low Dose | 0 | 39 | 0 | 39 |
Standard Dose | 0 | 42 | 1 | 41 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients With Partial Remission
Partial remission was defined as urine protein/creatinine ratio reduced by at least 50% from baseline and stable serum creatinine within 10% of baseline value) or improved. (NCT00423098)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks
,
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| At 12 weeks - Yes | At 12 weeks - No | At 24 weeks - Yes | At 24 weeks - No |
---|
Low Dose | 11 | 28 | 14 | 25 |
Standard Dose | 16 | 26 | 20 | 22 |
[back to top]
Survival
Survival (NCT00424489)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 6 |
[back to top]
Clinical Remission on Medication
6 months of clinical inactive disease (NCT00443430)
Timeframe: 12 months or end of study
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Methotrexate Arm | 3 |
Methotrexate-Prednisolone-Etanercept Arm | 9 |
[back to top]
Proportion of Participants Who Attain Inactive Disease by 6 Months
(NCT00443430)
Timeframe: 6 months after initiation of study intervention
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Methotrexate Arm | 10 |
Methotrexate-Prednisolone-Etanercept Arm | 17 |
[back to top]
Safety Profiles, Including the Number of Treatment-emergent, Serious, or Unexpected Adverse Events and Other Important Medical Events
(NCT00443430)
Timeframe: Over 12 months maximum study participation per subject
Intervention | events (Number) |
---|
Methotrexate Arm | 1 |
Methotrexate-Prednisolone-Etanercept Arm | 2 |
[back to top]
Relapse Rate
Relapse rate (disease recurrence) 3 years after transplant, for participants who received both transplants, as determined by Kaplan-Meier estimation. (NCT00481832)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
T & B Cell Mobilization Auto & Allo HCT | 27 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS) 3 years after transplant, for participants who received both transplants, as determined by Kaplan-Meier estimation. (NCT00481832)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
T & B Cell Mobilization Auto & Allo HCT | 57 |
[back to top]
Overall Mortality Rate
Overall mortality is determined by Kaplan-Meier estimation. The overall morality rate is expressed as the percentage of patients who died for any reason, including disease-related death. (NCT00481832)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
T & B Cell Mobilization Auto & Allo HCT | 56 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
Incidence of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)
The development of GvHD in vaccinated patients of any grade at 6 months. (NCT00481832)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
T & B Cell Mobilization Auto & Allo HCT | 3 |
[back to top]
Event-free Survival (EFS)
"Event-free survival (EFS) as determined for participants who receive both planned transplants, for a minimum of 3 years.~Events are defined as disease progression/relapse and death of all causes." (NCT00481832)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
T & B Cell Mobilization Auto & Allo HCT | 35 |
[back to top]
Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GvHD)
The development of GvHD in vaccinated patients of any grade and at 6 months. (NCT00481832)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
T & B Cell Mobilization Auto & Allo HCT | 3 |
[back to top]
Achieving Full Donor Chimerism
Achieving full donor chimerism (donor T cells >95%): Blood was sent for donor cell percentage measured by short tandem repeat (STR) at post-transplant Day 30; Day 60; Day 90; Day 120; Day 180; Day 270; and Day 360. Full donor chimerism is defined as donor CD3+ cells > 95%. (NCT00481832)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
T & B Cell Mobilization Auto & Allo HCT | 10 |
[back to top]
Incidence of Chemotherapy-associated Pneumonitis
Interstitial pneumonitis (IP) is a risk associated with high-dose carmustine (BCNU) or other chemotherapy drugs used for transplantation. IP is diagnosed by 1) a decrease of >25% in DLCO compared with pre-transplant PFT DLCO values or 2) a drop of 7% or more in oxygen saturation after exertion. (NCT00481832)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
T & B Cell Mobilization Auto & Allo HCT | 16 |
[back to top]
Amount of Pain Medication Taken Per Day
(NCT00492973)
Timeframe: Average of 3 days after surgery
Intervention | mg/day morphine equivalant (Mean) |
---|
Control Group | 47.8 |
Corticosteroid | 46.0 |
[back to top]
Length of Hospital Stay
(NCT00492973)
Timeframe: days after surgery
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|
Control Group | 3.5 |
Corticosteroid | 2.6 |
[back to top]
Complications, Such as Infections, Hospital Readmissions, Manipulations Under Anesthesia, Etc.
(NCT00492973)
Timeframe: any point during the first postoperative year
Intervention | Number of participants with complication (Number) |
---|
Control Group | 0 |
Corticosteroid | 3 |
[back to top]
Knee Society Scores
The Knee Society Score is on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst possible score, and 100 being the best possible score. The Knee Society Score takes into account subjective patient reports of pain and functional ability as well as clinical measures of passive knee range of motion. (NCT00492973)
Timeframe: 3 months postoperative
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Control Group | 87.1 |
Corticosteroid | 83.3 |
[back to top]
Knee Range of Motion
(NCT00492973)
Timeframe: 3 months
Intervention | degrees (Mean) |
---|
Control Group | 112.5 |
Corticosteroid | 112.4 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With An Improvement in Vision, as Measured by an Increase of 15 Letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) Vision Chart.
improvement with combination of niacin and topical prednisolone acetate (NCT00493064)
Timeframe: one year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Prospective Active Treatment | 63 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline to Day 98 Using the WOMAC Pain Question #1
"The WOMAC Index is a validated, 24-question self-administered assessment of three dimensions of pain, stiffness, and physical function for subjects with knee or hip OA. The WOMAC pain question #1 asks subjects to think about the pain you felt in your (study joint) caused by your arthritis during the last 48 hours when walking on a flat surface. This is a visual analog scale (VAS) where the subject indicates pain severity by making a mark through a 100 mm horizontal line with No Pain on the left (0 mm) and Extreme Pain on the right (100 mm). The distance between the left end of the scale and the subject's mark is measured in millimeters. Lower values represent a better outcome." (NCT00521989)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 98
Intervention | millimeters (Mean) |
---|
CRx-102 (2.7/90 mg) | -32.4 |
CRx-102 (2.7/180 mg) | -33.2 |
CRx-102 (2.7/360 mg) | -37.3 |
Prednisolone | -40.4 |
Placebo | -34.6 |
[back to top]
Percent Change From Baseline to Day 98 in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Values - As Treated Population
Preliminary review of the efficacy dataset revealed that the efficacy dataset was not robust enough to support an extensive formal efficacy analysis as described in the SAP. Therefore, only the CRP values over time and the percent change in CRP values in the As-Treated population were calculated. (NCT00551707)
Timeframe: baseline to day 98
Intervention | percentage of change from baseline (Median) |
---|
CRx-102 (2.7/180) | -29.90 |
CRx-102 (2.7/360) | -40.84 |
Prednisolone | 15.92 |
Dipyridamole | -33.67 |
Placebo | -27.64 |
[back to top]
Absolute C-reactive Protein (CRP) Values at Day 98 - As Treated Population
Preliminary review of the efficacy dataset revealed that the efficacy dataset was not robust enough to support an extensive formal efficacy analysis as described in the SAP. Therefore, only the CRP values over time and the percent change in CRP values in the As-Treated population were calculated. (NCT00551707)
Timeframe: Day 98
Intervention | mg/L (Median) |
---|
CRx-102 (2.7/180) | 12.85 |
CRx-102 (2.7/360) | 14.25 |
Prednisolone | 21.85 |
Dipyridamole | 16.60 |
Placebo | 2.68 |
[back to top]
Cumulative Incidence of NK Cell Reconstitution
Cumulative incidence of successful reconstitution to donor level is calculated. (NCT00553202)
Timeframe: At 5 years from HSCT date
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Allogeneic SCT) | 48.1 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS)
OS - Time from HSCT until death (NCT00553202)
Timeframe: At 5 years from HSCT date
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment (Chemotherapy and Allogeneic SCT) | 45.9 |
[back to top]
Response of Hemangioma (IH) to Treatment
"Response of IH not confined to the dermis will be coded using the following criteria: Progressive disease: >40% increase in volume by MRI, Partial response: >65% reduction in volume by MRI, Complete response: no visual or radiographic evidence of disease, Stable disease: none of the above or <40% increase or <65% decrease in volume by MRI.~Response of superficial IH will be coded using the following criteria (based on RECIST): Progressive disease: >30% increase in IH size, Partial response: >30% reduction in size, Complete response: no evidence of disease, Stable disease: none of the above.~Our first 3 patients showed limits to using MRI volume to measure IH size/response to therapy. Unlike other solid tumors, the superficial distribution of some IH made getting volume by MRI difficult, resulting in smaller tumor estimation compared to clinical assessment. Based on these observations, we amended the protocol to report response based on RECIST criteria instead of change in IH volume." (NCT00555464)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Progressive Disease | Partial Response | Complete Response | Stable Disease |
---|
Oral Steroid Treatment Group | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Vincristine Treatment Group | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
[back to top]
Toxicity to Medications
"Adverse events were closely monitored and recorded at weekly visits during treatment period and for two years after treatment ceased. Laboratory values were taken every other week during the treatment period.~Please see Adverse Events module for more details." (NCT00555464)
Timeframe: Initial visit, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12 weeks of therapy
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Patients with Serious Adverse Events | Patients with Other Adverse Events |
---|
Oral Steroid Treatment Group | 0 | 0 |
Vincristine Treatment Group | 0 | 3 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
Described via means and standard deviations in samples which have primary resistance to lestaurtinib (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: Sampled at the start of induction
Intervention | Proportion of cells that are viable (Median) |
---|
Arm A (Standard Risk MLL-G) | 0.75 |
Arm B (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy) | 0.48 |
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib) | 0.47 |
[back to top]
Describe in Vitro Sensitivity as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
Described via means and standard deviations in samples which have acquired resistance to lestaurtinib (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: At relapse (up to 3 years)
Intervention | Proportion of cells that are viable (Mean) |
---|
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib) | 0.69 |
[back to top]
Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm C at Dose Level 2 (DL2)
EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. EFS is constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with confidence interval based on standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: From start of post-induction therapy for up to 10 years
Intervention | percentage probability (Number) |
---|
Arm C (Safety/Efficacy Dose Level 2) | 35.82 |
[back to top]
Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Primary Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
Described via mean and standard deviation by group. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: Sampled at the start of induction
Intervention | qPCR fold expression ratio (Mean) |
---|
Arm A (Standard Risk MLL-G) | 1.25 |
Arm B (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy) | 7.85 |
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib) | 5.83 |
[back to top]
Describe FLT3 Protein Expression as a Molecular Mechanism of Acquired Resistance to Lestaurtinib in Leukemic Blasts
Described via means and standard deviations in available Arm C relapse samples (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: At relapse (up to 3 years)
Intervention | qPCR fold expression ratio (Mean) |
---|
Arm C (Safety/Efficacy Dose Level 2) | 5.73 |
[back to top]
Percent Probability of Event Free Survival (EFS) by MRD Status and Treatment Arm
Three-year EFS estimates and 90% CI will be reported by treatment arm and end-induction MRD status. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: 3 Years from end of Induction)
Intervention | percent probability (Number) |
---|
Arm A (MRD Negative) | 86.05 |
Arm A (MRD Positive) | 87.5 |
Arm B (MRD Negative) | 47.37 |
Arm B (MRD Positive) | 22.73 |
Arm C (MRD Negative) | 51.85 |
Arm C (MRD Positive) | 27.03 |
[back to top]
Pharmacodynamics PIA Levels in Infants Given Lestaurtinib at DL2 in Combination With Chemotherapy
Summarized with mean and standard deviation for those with available data in Arm C (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: Sampled between weeks 6-12 from start of induction
Intervention | Activity percentage (Mean) |
---|
Arm C (Safety/Efficacy Dose Level 2) | 69.00 |
[back to top]
Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) of MLL-R Infants Treated With Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Lestaurtinib at DL2
Event Free Probability where EFS time is defined as time from randomization to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. EFS is constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with confidence interval based on standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. EFS will be compared between patients on treatment Arm C at DL2 to those on Arm B. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: From start of post-induction therapy for up to 10 years.
Intervention | percent probability (Number) |
---|
Arm B (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy) | 38.89 |
Arm C (IR/HR MLL-R Chemotherapy and Lestaurtinib) | 35.82 |
[back to top]
Percent Probability for Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients on Arm A
EFS time is defined as time from treatment assignment to first event (relapse, second malignant neoplasm, death) or date of last contact for patients who are event-free. EFS is constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with confidence interval based on standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. (NCT00557193)
Timeframe: From start of post-induction therapy for up to 10 years
Intervention | percentage probability (Number) |
---|
Arm A (Standard Risk MLL-G) | 86.67 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Early Graft Loss
Early graft loss means a failure to achieve donor T-cell chimerism of > 5% at any time after transplant. The outcome is reported as the percentage of participants that experience early graft loss, a number without dispersion. (NCT00568633)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Allo-HSCT + TLI + ATG | 4 |
[back to top]
Disease-free Survival (DFS)
Disease-free survival is defined as the time interval between the date of attaining a first complete remission (CR) and the date of relapse. Disease free survival (DFS) will compared to conventional therapy vs Non-myeloablative Host Conditioning (NMA HCT). The outcome is reported as the number of participants which never experienced disease relapse (without dispersion). (NCT00568633)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Allo-HSCT + TLI + ATG | 5 |
Best Standard Care | 9 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival defined as the time interval between the date of attaining a first complete remission (CR) and the date of death from any cause. The outcome is reported as the number of participants alive (without dispersion). (NCT00568633)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Allo-HSCT + TLI + ATG | 9 |
Best Standard Care | 13 |
[back to top]
Relapse Rate
Relapse will be determined as ≥ 5% blast cells in the bone marrow, not secondary to regeneration after myelosuppressive therapy; OR emergence of extramedullary leukemia; OR the re-emergence of blasts in the peripheral blood. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants that meet these criteria (a number without dispersion). (NCT00568633)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Allo-HSCT + TLI + ATG | 20 |
Best Standard Care | 24 |
[back to top]
Patients Completing the Intended Therapy in Both Arms
The assessment for completion of the intended therapy (in both arms) will be reported as the percentage of participants, a number without dispersion (NCT00568633)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Allo-HSCT + TLI + ATG | 100 |
Best Standard Care | 81.8 |
[back to top]
Complete Donor Hematopoietic Cell Chimerism
Complete donor hematopoietic cell chimerism was evaluated in transplant recipients. Complete donor chimerism will be assessed as the presence of > 95% donor T-cells (CD3+) in the blood. The outcome is reported as the percentage of participants that achieve complete donor chimerism, a number without dispersion. (NCT00568633)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Allo-HSCT + TLI + ATG | 56 |
[back to top]
Non-relapse Mortality
Non-relapse mortality is defined as death that occurs after therapy, from any cause except a cause associated with relapse. This will be reported as the number of participants experiencing non-relapse mortality (a number without dispersion). (NCT00568633)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Allo-HSCT + TLI + ATG | 1 |
Best Standard Care | 2 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (10 Years) by Treatment
Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00577993)
Timeframe: 10 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Fludarabine,Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (FND)-Rituximab | 59 |
Rituximab- Fludarabine,Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (FND) | 58 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Overall Survival (10 Years) by Treatment
Overall Survival is the time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up within 10 years. (NCT00577993)
Timeframe: 10 Years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Fludarabine,Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (FND)-Rituximab | 59 |
Rituximab- Fludarabine,Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (FND) | 58 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Failure Rate
The failure rate was defined as a composite variable of CAS decrease of < 2 points or need for additional therapy (excluding cosmetic surgery) for the eye disease. (NCT00595335)
Timeframe: 6 months after first infusion, 12 months after first infusion
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Failure rate at 6 months | Failure rate at 12 months |
---|
Placebo | 75 | 50 |
Rituximab | 69 | 46 |
[back to top]
Change in Proptosis
Eye proptosis is a condition resulting in forward displacement of the globe from its normal position within the orbit. It is measured by computed tomography. Improvement in proptosis was defined as a decrease in proptosis by ≥2 mm. (NCT00595335)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 months after first infusion
,
Intervention | mm (Mean) |
---|
| Proptosis right eye | Proptosis left eye |
---|
Placebo | 0.80 | 0.0 |
Rituximab | 0.82 | 0.1 |
[back to top]
Change in Lid Fissure
"The palpebral fissure is the elliptic space between the medial and lateral canthi of the two open eye lids. In adults, this measures about 10mm vertically and 30mm horizontally. The fissure may be increased in vertical height in Graves' disease.~Improvement was defined as a decrease in lid aperture width by ≥3 mm." (NCT00595335)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months after first infusion
,
Intervention | mm (Median) |
---|
| Lid fissure right eye | Lid fissure left eye |
---|
Placebo | 0 | 0.5 |
Rituximab | 0 | 0 |
[back to top]
Failure Rate at One Year
The failure rate was defined as a composite variable of CAS decrease of < 2 points or need for additional therapy (excluding cosmetic surgery) for the eye disease. (NCT00595335)
Timeframe: one year
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Rituximab | 46 |
Placebo | 50 |
[back to top]
Change in Clinical Activity Score (CAS)
The clinical activity score (CAS), for Grave's ophthalmopathy has become a widely accepted tool to assess disease activity and help decide the management of the condition. The CAS, which is based on classical signs of inflammation (pain, redness, and swelling), consists of 7 equally weighted items. The total CAS (as used in this study) may range from 0 to 7. The higher the CAS, the greater degree of inflammation is present. A drop in CAS of 2 or more points suggests an improvement in the inflammatory components of the disease. A CAS ≥3 implies active disease. (NCT00595335)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months after the first infusion
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Rituximab | -1.2 |
Placebo | -1.5 |
[back to top]
Change in Extraocular Motility
"Change extraocular motility was assessed using the Gorman diplopia score. Diplopia, commonly known as double vision, is the simultaneous perception of two images of a single object that may be displaced horizontally, vertically, or diagonally (i.e., both vertically and horizontally) in relation to each other. It is usually the result of impaired function of the extraocular muscles, where both eyes are still functional but they cannot converge to target the desired object.~The Gorman diplopia score includes four categories: 1) no diplopia (absent), 2) diplopia when the patient is tired or awakening (intermittent), 3) diplopia at extremes of gaze (inconstant), and 4) continuous diplopia in the primary or reading position (constant)." (NCT00595335)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months after first infusion, 12 months after first infusion
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Change baseline-6 months | Change baseline-12 months |
---|
Placebo | 2.5 | 1.5 |
Rituximab | 3 | 2 |
[back to top]
Change in Disease Severity
Disease severity was measured by the NOSPECS Score. This classification scheme of the eye changes in thyroid eye disease was introduced by the American Thyroid Association. It separates patients into seven classes of disease (class 0-6), with 0 being no signs or symptoms and 6 being sight loss. (The acronym is based on the first letter of the defining characteristic of each class, the classification is known as: 'no signs or symptoms; only signs; soft tissue; proptosis; extraocular muscle; cornea; sight loss' (NOSPECS) ). (NCT00595335)
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months after first infusion
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Improvement by 1 class | Improvement by 2 classes | Deterioration | No change |
---|
Placebo | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Rituximab | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
[back to top]
Non-relapse Mortality (NRM) at 6 Months
Percentage of participants at 6 months whose deaths were without relapse/recurrence. (NCT00609609)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Corticosteroids | 19.6 |
ECP + Corticosteroids | 20.0 |
[back to top]
Day 56 Treatment Success
Definition of Treatment Failure: No Response according to the following: A) Skin: 1) No change in GVHD stage by day 14; 2) Gut: No change in GVHD stage by Day 7; 3) Liver: No change in GVHD stage by Day 21. B) Progressive Disease (PD): 1) Skin/Gut: Increase in Stage by 72 hours from the start of therapy; 2) Liver: Increase in Stage by Day 14; 3) Initiation of 2nd line treatment at any time for acute GVHD: 4) Any new organ involvement by acute GVHD. C) Inability to Taper: 1) Patient still on >1 mg/kg/d of methylprednisolone equivalent at 1 month. 2) Patient still on > 0.5 mg/kg/d of methylprednisolone equivalent at 2 months; 3) Death from GVHD. Definition of Treatment Success: Participants not defined above in Treatment Failure definition. Baseline biopsy with Acute GVHD assessed weekly until last ECP procedure (anticipated Day 63). At 6 months follow up with a phone call for survival and GVHD status. (NCT00609609)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 63 (approximately 9 weeks), Acute GVHD scored weekly.
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Skin-only | Visceral Involvement | Total |
---|
Corticosteroids | 57 | 43 | 53 |
ECP + Corticosteroids | 72 | 47 | 65 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Alive, In Remission & Without GVHD Progression Day 28 & Day 56
Percentage meeting steroid milestone who were alive, in remission and did not have GVHD progression before Day 28 or Day 56. (NCT00609609)
Timeframe: Up to day 56
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 28 Steroid dose | Day 56 steroid dose < 0.1mg/kg |
---|
Corticosteroids | 10 | 30 |
ECP + Corticosteroids | 23.5 | 43 |
[back to top]
The Average Percent Volume Reduction in the Lipoma.
(NCT00624416)
Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks
Intervention | Percent Volume reduction (cc^3) (Mean) |
---|
Prednisolone and Isoproteronol | 50 |
[back to top]
The Number of Subjects Elected to Have the Lipoma Removed.
(NCT00624416)
Timeframe: After four weeks up to one year.
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Prednisolone and Isoproteronol | 8 |
[back to top]
The Number of Lipoma Increased in Volume.
(NCT00624416)
Timeframe: After four weeks of treatment up to one year.
Intervention | Lipomas (Number) |
---|
Prednisolone and Isoproteronol | 9 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
ACR20 response: >= 20% improvement in tender joint count; >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (HAQ-DI); and CRP. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 |
---|
Placebo | 17.6 | 31.1 | 31.1 | 31.1 | 41.9 | 47.3 | 43.2 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 26.0 | 34.2 | 42.5 | 49.3 | 61.6 | 64.4 | 67.1 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 21.3 | 34.7 | 44.0 | 52.0 | 64.0 | 62.7 | 61.3 |
[back to top]
Number of Tender Joints
The number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | tender joints (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 |
---|
Placebo | 17.0 | 13.6 | 11.9 | 11.7 | 11.0 | 9.4 | 9.0 | 9.4 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 17.7 | 13.0 | 11.6 | 10.1 | 9.6 | 8.4 | 7.6 | 7.6 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 16.8 | 11.9 | 10.7 | 9.8 | 8.8 | 7.3 | 7.6 | 8.1 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR 50) Response at Week 24
ACR50 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; >=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ-DI]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Placebo | 16.2 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 29.3 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 27.4 |
[back to top]
Number of Swollen Joints
The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Baseline. Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | swollen joints (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 |
---|
Placebo | 12.2 | 9.5 | 7.8 | 7.0 | 7.6 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.2 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 13.9 | 10.2 | 9.0 | 7.7 | 7.1 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 5.0 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 12.3 | 9.0 | 8.5 | 6.9 | 6.0 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 4.7 |
[back to top]
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks: 1) dress/groom; 2) arise; 3) eat; 4) walk; 5) reach; 6) grip; 7) hygiene; and 8) common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. The overall disability index computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 |
---|
Placebo | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28
The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 =< 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 >3.2 to =<5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to =<1.2 with DAS28 =<5.1; non-responders: change from baseline =< 0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and =<1.2 with DAS28 >5.1. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 2: good response | Week 2: moderate response | Week 2: no response | Week 4: good response | Week 4: moderate response | Week 4: no response | Week 8: good response | Week 8: moderate response | Week 8: no response | Week 12: good response | Week 12: moderate response | Week 12: no response | Week 16: good response | Week 16: moderate response | Week 16: no response | Week 20: good response | Week 20: moderate response | Week 20: no response | Week 24: good response | Week 24: moderate response | Week 24: no response |
---|
Placebo | 1.4 | 33.8 | 64.9 | 5.4 | 39.2 | 55.4 | 8.1 | 44.6 | 47.3 | 9.5 | 39.2 | 51.4 | 18.9 | 40.5 | 40.5 | 17.6 | 37.8 | 44.6 | 14.9 | 44.6 | 40.5 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 2.7 | 39.7 | 57.5 | 8.2 | 45.2 | 46.6 | 12.3 | 53.4 | 34.2 | 16.4 | 52.1 | 31.5 | 20.5 | 56.2 | 23.3 | 26.0 | 54.8 | 19.2 | 30.1 | 50.7 | 19.2 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 6.7 | 38.7 | 54.7 | 14.7 | 41.3 | 44.0 | 14.7 | 44.0 | 41.3 | 21.3 | 53.3 | 25.3 | 34.7 | 41.3 | 24.0 | 29.3 | 52.0 | 18.7 | 26.7 | 46.7 | 26.7 |
[back to top]
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28)
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and participant's general health visual analog scale (scores ranging 0 [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad]). DAS28 less than or equal to (=<) 3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>) 3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 |
---|
Placebo | 6.1 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 6.1 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.0 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 5.8 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
[back to top]
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 10 point scale, where 0 = no disease activity and 10 = extreme disease activity. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 |
---|
Placebo | 6.8 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 6.6 | 5.2 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 6.4 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 |
[back to top]
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS-pain)
100 millimeter (mm) line (Visual Analog Scale) marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 = no pain to 100 = worst possible pain. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | mm (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 |
---|
Placebo | 65.4 | 53.0 | 53.6 | 56.4 | 54.3 | 51.1 | 51.1 | 49.2 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 61.6 | 49.6 | 49.0 | 47.0 | 44.8 | 40.8 | 39.1 | 43.9 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 62.5 | 47.7 | 48.9 | 45.8 | 42.3 | 39.3 | 39.5 | 39.2 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
ACR70 response: >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (HAQ-DI); and CRP. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 |
---|
Placebo | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 6.8 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 1.4 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 9.6 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 8.0 | 6.7 | 9.3 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
ACR50 response: >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (HAQ-DI); and CRP. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 |
---|
Placebo | 0.0 | 6.8 | 12.2 | 14.9 | 16.2 | 16.2 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 6.8 | 6.8 | 8.2 | 13.7 | 31.5 | 28.8 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 8.0 | 8.0 | 10.7 | 16.0 | 30.7 | 28.0 |
[back to top]
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity
Measured using a 0-10 point scale, where 0 = no disease activity and 10 = extreme disease activity. (NCT00634933)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 20 | Week 24 |
---|
Placebo | 7.3 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 6.6 | 5.5 | 5.3 |
TRU-015 Induction Dose | 7.0 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.7 |
TRU-015 Single Dose | 6.9 | 5.6 | 5.4 | 5.2 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With a Response
Response - Complete remission (CR): Normalization peripheral blood & bone marrow 5% or & platelet count >100x10^9/L; CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp): CR but platelet count <100x10^9/L. CR with incomplete recovery (CRi): CR but platelet count <100x10^9/L or absolute neutrophil count < 1x10^9/L. Partial response (PR): As above except for presence of 6-25% marrow blasts. Lymphoblastic lymphoma (& ALL subtypes with extramedullary disease): CR - disappearance all known disease. PR - >50% decrease in tumor size using sum of product, includes 50% volume decrease in lesions measurable in 3 dimensions. No Response (NR) - No significant change (includes stable disease). Lesions decreased size but <50% or lesions with slight enlargement <25% increase in size. Progressive Disease (PD): Appearance new lesions, 25% or > increase in size existing lesions (>50% if 1 lesion & <2). (NCT00671658)
Timeframe: Response assessed following first 21 day course up to end of treatment with 8 cycles, up to 210 days
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Complete Response (CR) | Complete Response without Platelet Recovery | Partial Response (PR) |
---|
HYPER-CVAD | 198 | 3 | 4 |
[back to top]
Change in Serum Osteocalcin
Change in serum markers of bone formation (osteocalcin) from Day 0 to Day 28. (NCT00682357)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit to Day 28
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|
Group 1 - Standard Dose | -2.18 |
Group 2 - Low Dose | -0.45 |
Group 3 - Placebo | -1.10 |
[back to top]
Change in Serum Cortisol
Cortisol levels were measured over 28 days. Outcome represents mean change in cortisol level between baseline visit and day 28. (NCT00682357)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit to Day 28
Intervention | mcg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Group 1 - Standard Dose | -1.16 |
Group 2 - Low Dose | 0.65 |
Group 3 - Placebo | 1.30 |
[back to top]
Change in Testosterone
Outcome represents the mean change in testosterone level from baseline visit to day 28. (NCT00682357)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit to Day 28
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Group 1 - Standard Dose | 0.08 |
[back to top]
Change in Serum Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b)
Outcome represents the mean change in serum biomarkers of bone breakdown (TRACP-5b) from baseline visit to day 28. (NCT00682357)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline Visit to Day 28
Intervention | U/L (Mean) |
---|
Group 1 - Standard Dose | -0.153 |
Group 2 - Low Dose | -0.295 |
Group 3 - Placebo | -0.148 |
[back to top]
Ocular Redness at Day 28
Post-CAC ocular redness from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular redness, post-instillation, on Day 28. Ocular redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular redness score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 7 minutes post-CAC | 15 minutes post-CAC | 20 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 1.69 | 1.69 | 1.69 |
Pred Forte | 1.58 | 1.81 | 1.5 |
Pred Mild | 1.96 | 2.11 | 1.86 |
Tears Naturale | 1.81 | 1.94 | 1.72 |
[back to top]
Ocular Redness at Day 7
Post-CAC ocular redness from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular redness, post-instillation, on Day 7. Ocular redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular redness score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 7 minutes post-CAC | 15 minutes post-CAC | 20 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.47 |
Pred Forte | 2.08 | 1.83 | 1.72 |
Pred Mild | 1.53 | 1.69 | 1.78 |
Tears Naturale | 1.59 | 1.66 | 1.5 |
[back to top]
Ocular Redness at Day 6
Post-CAC ocular redness from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular redness, post-instillation, on Day 6. Ocular redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular redness score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 7 minutes post-CAC | 15 minutes post-CAC | 20 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 1.84 | 2.13 | 2.03 |
Pred Forte | 2 | 1.97 | 2 |
Pred Mild | 2.22 | 2.41 | 2.31 |
Tears Naturale | 2.11 | 2.28 | 2.17 |
[back to top]
Ocular Itching at Day 28
Post-CAC ocular itching from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular itching, post-instillation, on Day 28. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 3 minutes post-CAC | 5 minutes post-CAC | 7 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 2.03 | 2 | 1.78 |
Pred Forte | 1.83 | 1.97 | 1.89 |
Pred Mild | 2.25 | 2.64 | 2.71 |
Tears Naturale | 1.75 | 1.78 | 1.56 |
[back to top]
Ocular Redness at Day 27
Post-CAC ocular redness from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular redness, post-instillation, on Day 27. Ocular redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular redness score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 7 minutes post-CAC | 15 minutes post-CAC | 20 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 1.44 | 1.63 | 1.53 |
Pred Forte | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.53 |
Pred Mild | 2.14 | 2.11 | 1.89 |
Tears Naturale | 1.56 | 1.72 | 1.72 |
[back to top]
Ocular Redness at Baseline (Day 0)
A baseline CAC was performed on Day 0. Post-CAC ocular redness from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular redness, post-instillation, on Day 6, Day 7, Day 27 and Day 28. Ocular redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular redness score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 7 minutes post-CAC | 15 minutes post-CAC | 20 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 1.86 | 2.11 | 2 |
Pred Forte | 2.11 | 2.33 | 2.22 |
Pred Mild | 2.11 | 2.31 | 2.28 |
Tears Naturale | 2.08 | 2.25 | 2.06 |
[back to top]
Ocular Itching at Day 7
Post-CAC ocular itching from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular itching, post-instillation, on Day 7. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 3 minutes post-CAC | 5 minutes post-CAC | 7 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 2.09 | 2.03 | 1.88 |
Pred Forte | 2.11 | 2.11 | 1.97 |
Pred Mild | 2.28 | 2.69 | 2.75 |
Tears Naturale | 2.03 | 1.94 | 1.72 |
[back to top]
Ocular Itching at Day 6
Post-CAC ocular itching from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular itching, post-instillation, on Day 6. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 3 minutes post-CAC | 5 minutes post-CAC | 7 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 2.06 | 2.41 | 2.31 |
Pred Forte | 2.17 | 2.44 | 2.17 |
Pred Mild | 2.19 | 2.59 | 2.72 |
Tears Naturale | 2.33 | 2.53 | 2.14 |
[back to top]
Ocular Itching at Day 27
Post-CAC ocular itching from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular itching, post-instillation, on Day 27. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 3 minutes post-CAC | 5 minutes post-CAC | 7 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 1.75 | 2.09 | 2 |
Pred Forte | 2.14 | 2.17 | 2.03 |
Pred Mild | 2.43 | 2.64 | 2.64 |
Tears Naturale | 2.03 | 1.84 | 1.72 |
[back to top]
Ocular Itching at Baseline (Day 0)
A baseline CAC was performed on Day 0. Post-CAC ocular itching from Day 0 will be compared to post-CAC ocular itching, post-instillation, on Day 6, Day 7, Day 27 and Day 28. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed. (NCT00689078)
Timeframe: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 3 minutes post-CAC | 5 minutes post-CAC | 7 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Alrex | 2.61 | 3.06 | 3.08 |
Pred Forte | 2.53 | 2.92 | 3.03 |
Pred Mild | 3.08 | 3.47 | 3.44 |
Tears Naturale | 2.5 | 2.75 | 2.83 |
[back to top]
Mean Aqueous Humor Prednisolone Acetate Concentration
(NCT00699803)
Timeframe: 4 hours
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|
T-Pred | 102.5 |
Pred Forte | 127.5 |
[back to top]
Overall EFS Rate for the Combined Cohort of Standard- and High-Risk Patients (Who Receive the Final Chosen Dose of Dasatinib)
An event is defined as: Induction failure, relapse at any site, secondary malignancy, or death. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: From the time entry on study to first event or date of last follow-up, assessed up to 7 years
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy) | 79.8 |
Standard-risk | 83.2 |
High-risk | 66.7 |
[back to top]
Percent of Patients MRD Positive (MRD > 0.01%) at End of Consolidation
A 1-sample Z-test of proportions (alpha=5%, 1-sided test) will be used. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: At end of consolidation (at 11 weeks)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy) | 10.5 |
Standard-risk | 0 |
High-risk | 66.7 |
[back to top]
Feasibility and Toxicity of an Intensified Chemotherapeutic Regimen Incorporating Dasatinib for Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Ph+ ALL Assessed by Examining Adverse Events
Number of patients in safety cohort with dose limiting toxicity (DLT)(including treatment delay) (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: Weeks 3 through 23 of treatment (From week 3 Induction through Intensification Block 1)
Intervention | Pts with DLTs (Number) |
---|
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy) | 1 |
[back to top]
Event-Free Survival (EFS) of Patients With Standard-risk Disease Treated With Dasatinib in Combination With Intensified Chemotherapy
Event-Free Survival (EFS) curves will be constructed using the Kaplan-Meier life table method with standard errors computed using the method of Peto and Peto. A 1-sided 95% confidence interval for EFS will be constructed. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: At 3 years
Intervention | Percent probability (Number) |
---|
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy) | 79.8 |
Standard-risk | 83.2 |
High-risk | 66.7 |
[back to top]
Contribution of Dasatinib on Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) After Induction Therapy
Percent of patients MRD Positive (MRD > 0.01%) at End of Induction. (NCT00720109)
Timeframe: At the end of induction therapy (at 5 weeks)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Induction (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy & Chemotherapy) | 40.7 |
Standard-risk | 29.2 |
High-risk | 100.0 |
[back to top]
Overall Response Rate
To evaluate the overall (ORR) response rate with relapsed follicular NHL treated with ESHAP chemotherapy for cytoreduction (2 cycles) followed by Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) radioimmunotherapy. Descriptive and summary statistics for demographic and clinical variables obtained. The incidences of reported adverse events (AEs) tabulated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for PFS and OS performed on TPP. All the analyses were performed using Stata [12]. (NCT00732498)
Timeframe: 5 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
ESHAP Followed by Zevalin and Rituximab | 77.3 |
[back to top]
Complete Response Rate
To evaluate the complete (CR) response rate with relapsed follicular NHL treated with ESHAP chemotherapy for cytoreduction (2 cycles) followed by Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) radioimmunotherapy (NCT00732498)
Timeframe: 5 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
ESHAP Followed by Zevalin and Rituximab | 10 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Progression-free Survival at 1 Year
To evaluate the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treated with ESHAP chemotherapy for cytoreduction (2 cycles) followed by Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) radioimmunotherapy. (NCT00732498)
Timeframe: 1 year
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
ESHAP Followed by Zevalin and Rituximab | 38 |
[back to top]
Numerical Rating Leg Pain Score
0-10 pain score. 0= no pain, 10= worst imaginable pain. (NCT00733096)
Timeframe: 1 month
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid | 2.54 |
Etanercept | 3.56 |
Saline | 3.78 |
[back to top]
Global Perceived Effect
Satisfaction. Number of participants with positive perceived global satisfaction. (NCT00733096)
Timeframe: 1 month
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Steroid | 23 |
Etanercept | 15 |
Saline | 17 |
[back to top]
Medication Reduction
Number of people who reduced medications (NCT00733096)
Timeframe: 1 month
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Steroid | 17 |
Etanercept | 9 |
Saline | 14 |
[back to top]
Oswestry Disability Score
0-100%. 0= no disability, 100% is complete disability (NCT00733096)
Timeframe: 1 month
Intervention | percentage of disability out of 100% (Mean) |
---|
Steroid | 22.4 |
Etanercept | 40.26 |
Saline | 30.00 |
[back to top]
Percent of Patients With a Decrease of More Than 5 Letters in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA).
BCVA was measured using the procedure developed for the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. (NCT00782717)
Timeframe: From Day 7 to Day 90 (or Early Exit)
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
NEVANAC | 6 |
Nepafenac Vehicle | 12 |
[back to top]
Percent of Patients Who Developed Macular Edema (ME) Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery
Macular edema (thickening of the center of the back of the eye) was defined as 30% or greater increase from pre-operative baseline measurement in central subfield macular thickness as measured using Optical Coherence Tomography(OCT). (NCT00782717)
Timeframe: 3 Months
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
NEVANAC | 3 |
Nepafenac Vehicle | 17 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Disability Score: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
"Disability scores (disease improvement defined by at least a 1 point increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) on consecutive evaluations at least three months apart.~The EDSS scale ranges from 0 to 10 in 0.5 unit increments that represent higher levels of disability." (NCT00787722)
Timeframe: pretransplant 6 month, 5 year
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Pretransplant Disability Score (EDSS) | 1 Year Post Transplant Disability Score (EDSS) | 5 Year Post Transplant Disability Score (EDSS) |
---|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 4.4 | 2.8 | 3.3 |
[back to top]
Survival
survival rate will be evaluated at 6 months,1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year after the transplant (NCT00787722)
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year - after the transplant
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| 6 months survival | 1 year survival | 2 year survival | 3 year survival | 4 year survival | 5 year survival |
---|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 13 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
[back to top]
Post HSCT Immune -Modulating Medication and Relapse
Number of immune - modulating medication and relapse evaluated 5 year - after the transplant (NCT00787722)
Timeframe: Pre transplant and 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year and 5 year after transplant
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Pre HSCT - Immunosuppression/Relapse Rate | 6 Mos Post HSCT Immunosuppression/ Relapse Rate | 1 Year Post HSCT Immunosuppression/Relapse Rate | 2 Year Post HSCT Immunosuppression/Relapse Rate | 3 Year Post HSCT Immunosuppression/Relapse Rate | 4 Year Post HSCT Immunosuppression/Relapse Rate | 5 Year Post HSCT Immunosuppression Relapse Rate |
---|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) | 12 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
[back to top]
NMO-IgG Aquaporin- 4 Autoantibody Titer
NMO-IgG aquaporin- 4 autoantibody titer will be tested pretransplant and post transplant. (NCT00787722)
Timeframe: Pretransplant and 5 year Post Transplant
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Pretransplant NMO ASSAY positive | 5 year post transplant NMO Assay positive |
---|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 11 | 2 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients Who Require No Device Assistance for Ambulation
No Device Assistance Needed for Ambulation evaluated at 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year - after the transplant (NCT00787722)
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 3 year, 4 year, 5 year - after the transplant
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Pre HSCT- No Assistive Required | 6 Mos Post HSCT- No Assistive Device Required | 1 Year Post HSCT- No Assistive Device Required | 2 Year Post HSCT- No Assistive Device Required | 3 Year Post HSCT- No Assistive Device Required | 4 Year Post HSCT- No Assistive Device Required | 5 Year Post HSCT- No Assistive Device Required |
---|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 6 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
[back to top]
Relapse-free Survival (RFS) After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00792948)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | Probability of 12-month RFS (Number) |
---|
Treatment | 0.83 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS)
OS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00792948)
Timeframe: From the date of initial registration on the study until death from any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Intervention | Probability of surviving 12 months (Number) |
---|
Treatment | 0.88 |
[back to top]
Continuous Complete Remission (CCR) Rate
Will be testing using an exact binomial test (NCT00792948)
Timeframe: 18 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment | 57 |
[back to top]
Vertigo Attacks
The number of vertigo attacks between 18-24months follow-up were taken retrospectively during a face-to-face appointment at 24 months follow-up and compared to 6 month pre-enrollment baseline (as per Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines). (NCT00802529)
Timeframe: 6month pre-enrollment baseline, 18-24 months after initial treatment
,
Intervention | Vertigo Attacks (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | 18-24months |
---|
Gentamicin | 19.93 | 2.5 |
Steroid (Methylprednisolone) | 16.4 | 1.6 |
[back to top]
Change in Hearing
Hearing was measured as ipsilesional pure-tone threshold at Baseline, 1month, 2months, 6months, 12month, 18months and 24 months follow-up. Hearing level was taken as the average threshold across 0.5, 1, 2 and 3KHz. (NCT00802529)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1,2,6,12,18 and 24months after initial treatment
,
Intervention | dB (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | 1month | 2months | 6months | 12months | 18months | 24months |
---|
Gentamicin | 51.5 | 52.18 | 48.99 | 45.48 | 47.34 | 44.82 | 49.1 |
Steroid (Methylprednisolone) | 53.25 | 49.29 | 49.83 | 46.67 | 47.02 | 48.44 | 46.9 |
[back to top]
Change in Speech Discrimination
"Speech discrimination was measured at Baseline, 1month, 2months, 6months, 12month and 24 months follow-up.~Speech discrimination was assessed by means of ipsilesional suprathreshold word recognition (%). Arthur Boothroyd's isophonemic word lists (AB wordlists, Guymark, Southampton) comprising sets of 10 words were played to the ipsilesional ear at the low-frequency pure-tone threshold of 0·5, 1 and 2 kHz +30dB with masking sound in the contralesional ear if necessary. The formula for masking level was: low-frequency pure-tone threshold in ipsilesional ear - bone conduction mean threshold (0·5, 1 and 2KHz) in contralesional ear - 40dB. Speech loudness and masking were rounded to the nearest 5dB. Step increments and decrements of 10dB for speech loudness and masking were used to attain the maximum speech discrimination score." (NCT00802529)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1,2,6,12 and 24months after initial treatment
,
Intervention | Percentage correct (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | 1month | 2months | 6months | 12months | 24months |
---|
Gentamicin | 72.10 | 69.43 | 74.31 | 76.35 | 71.58 | 64.99 |
Steroid (Methylprednisolone) | 64.97 | 71.78 | 76.10 | 75.63 | 73.43 | 76.32 |
[back to top]
Overall Response
Complete response (CR) was defined as normalization of peripheral blood and bone marrow with <5% blasts, a peripheral absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >/= 1 * 10^9/l, hemoglobin >/= 100g/l, and a platelet count >/= * 10^9/l, Partial Response (PR) was defined as transfusion independence with a peripheral blood ANC >=/ 0.05 * 10^9/l, a platelet count >/= 20 * 10^9/l, and a hemoglobin >/= 40 g/l. Hematologic improvement was defined as a clinically relevant increase in hemoglobin, platelets or absolute neutrophil count. (NCT00806598)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first. Assessed first at 3 months on study, continuing monthly up to 3 years.
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Complete Response | Partial Response | Hematological Improvement |
---|
Thymoglobulin + Cyclosporin | 8 | 8 | 4 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Arrhythmias at 6 Weeks
Clinically significant atrial arrhythmias include ER, urgent care, or hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, or atrial fibrillation requiring an increase in anti-arrhythmia medication (NCT00807586)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Steroid | 4 |
Placebo | 12 |
[back to top]
Repeat Intervention
Need for repeat ablation (NCT00807586)
Timeframe: 3 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Steroid | 2 |
Placebo | 8 |
[back to top]
Cardiac Pain Assessment
Perception of cardiac pain assessed by a numerical pain scale (0= no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable) (NCT00807586)
Timeframe: one day and one week
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Pain Scale Day 1 | Pain Scale Week 1 |
---|
Placebo | 1.5 | 0.6 |
Steroid | 0.9 | 0.8 |
[back to top]
Means Aqueous Humor Prednisolone Acetate Concentration
(NCT00854061)
Timeframe: 35 days
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|
T-Pred | 100.02 |
Pred Forte | 131.65 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients Whose Cytotoxic Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) is Decreased by 50%
Number of patients on the waiting list whose cytotoxic PRA is decreased by 50%. (NCT00908583)
Timeframe: 46 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
All Study Participants | 6 |
[back to top]
Number of Living Donor Transplant Candidates That Are Transplanted
Number of living donor transplant candidates who convert to a negative flow T- and B-cell crossmatch via desensitization and are subsequently transplanted (NCT00908583)
Timeframe: 1 year post baseline
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
All Study Participants | 19 |
[back to top]
Acute Rejection Rate
Acute rejection rate at 6 months of all desensitized and transplanted patients (NCT00908583)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
All Transplanted Participants | 3 |
[back to top]
Overall Safety of Bortezomib
Incidence of grade 3 and above non-hematologic toxicities. Incidence of grade 4 hematologic toxicities. Incidence of all grades of peripheral neuropathy. Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Polyomavirus Allograft Nephropathy (PVN), and Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD). (NCT00908583)
Timeframe: Study Day 62
,,,,,,,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Incidence of CTCAE Grade 3 Anemia (<8.0-6.5 g/dL) | Incidence of CTCAE Grade 4 Anemia (<6.5g/dL) | Incidence of CTCAE Grade 3 Thrombocytopenia | Incidence of CTCAE Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia | Incidence of CTCAE Grade 3 Neutropenia | Incidence of CTCAE Grade 4 Neutropenia | Incidence of new onset level 1 PN | Incidence of new onset level 2 PN | Incidence of new onset level 3 PN | Incidence of new onset level 4 PN | Incidence of new onset level 5 PN | CMV D+/R- Status | CMV Viremia or Invasive Disease | Polyomavirus Allograft Nephropathy (PVN) | Malignancy |
---|
Phase 1 Cycle 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase 1, Cycle 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase 2 Cycle 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase 2, Cycle 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase 3, Cycle 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase 3, Cycle 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase 4, Single Stage | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Phase 5, Single Stage | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[back to top]
Mean Number of Days With Acute Medication Use
"Acute medication use meant the consumption of a drug to abort or terminate a headache." (NCT00915473)
Timeframe: 4 weeks post-injection
Intervention | days per 4 weeks (Mean) |
---|
Active Injection | 6.7 |
Placebo Injection | 7.7 |
[back to top]
Number of Subjects With at Least 50% Reduction in the Frequency of Days With Moderate or Severe Migraine in the 4 Week Post Injection Compared to the 4 Week Pre-injection Baseline Period
The baseline frequency will be the number of calendar days with moderate or severe migraine during the 4 week period prior to injection, and the follow-up frequency will be the number of calendar days with migraine during the 4 week period following injection. (NCT00915473)
Timeframe: 4 weeks pre-injection baseline, 4 weeks post-injection
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Active Injection | 10 |
Placebo Injection | 9 |
[back to top]
Mean Frequency of Days With a Migraine
(NCT00915473)
Timeframe: 4 weeks post-injection
,
Intervention | days per 4 weeks (Mean) |
---|
| Severe | At Least Moderate | At Least Mild |
---|
Active Injection | 3.4 | 7.0 | 9.3 |
Placebo Injection | 2.9 | 7.8 | 10.4 |
[back to top]
Mean Number of Hours With Moderate or Severe Migraine
(NCT00915473)
Timeframe: 4 weeks post-injection
Intervention | hours per 4 weeks (Mean) |
---|
Active Injection | 60 |
Placebo Injection | 58 |
[back to top]
Mean Cumulative Prednisone Dose (mg/kg) Over 42 Days From the Start of Treatment
The total cumulative dose of prednisone (milligrams/kilogram) was calculated starting from the start of therapy through study day 42. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: At day 42 after initiation of treatment
Intervention | milligrams per kilogram (Mean) |
---|
Grade IIa GVHD; 0.5 mg/kg/d Prednisone | 22.2 |
Grade IIa GVHD; 1.0 mg/kg/d Prednisone | 27.1 |
Grade IIb-IV GVHD; 1.0 mg/kg/d Prednisone | 38.4 |
Grade IIb-IV GVHD; 2.0 mg/kg/d Prednisone | 41.3 |
[back to top]
Non-relapse Mortality
Non-relapse mortality (NRM) is defined as death due to any cause in the absence of documented relapse/progression. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: At 12 months after the start of prednisone therapy
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | 15 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | 16 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival
Percentage of patients surviving as estimated by Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: At 12 months after the start of prednisone therapy
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | 77 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | 77 |
[back to top]
Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Hyperglycemia
Impact on blood glucose (BG) control will be assessed by comparing average BG and BG-variability between patients given standard-dose and low-dose prednisone. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: Baseline and then through 42 days after starting treatment
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | 140 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | 142 |
[back to top]
Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Hypertension
The number of different anti-hypertensive medications administered to control hypertension were collected. The mean change in the number of medications from baseline to day 42 was measured. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: Baseline and then through 42 days after starting treatment
Intervention | medications (Mean) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | -0.29 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | -0.24 |
[back to top]
Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Invasive Infections (Bacterial, Fungal and Viral)
The total number of invasive infections (bacterial, fungal and viral) occurring in patients in each group were collected. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: Baseline and through 100 days of treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | 52 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | 53 |
[back to top]
Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Myopathy
Assessed by mean change from baseline to day 42 using Manual Muscle Testing measure. The degree of resistance against pressure applied by tester was measured on a 5-point scale. A score of 5 indicates the patient can hold the position against maximum to strong resistance. A score of 0 indicates the patient has no resistance against pressure. Testing included upper and lower extremities: shoulder (deltoid at 90 degrees), and hip and knee in a sitting position. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: Baseline and then weekly until 42 days after starting treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | -0.18 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | -0.18 |
[back to top]
Prednisone-associated Toxicity as Assessed by Quality of Life
Patients completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), which is a quality of life questionnaire validated for oncology/transplant patients. On a 1-10 point scale, patients scored the degree of severity of symptoms or the degree of interference in feelings or function due to symptoms at baseline or in the previous week. A score of 1 indicates symptom is not present or does not interfere with feelings or function. A score of 10 indicates the symptom is as bad as you can imagine or interferes completely with feelings or function. The mean change in score from baseline to day 42 was measured. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: Baseline and then every other week until 42 days after starting treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | -2.3 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | -1.9 |
[back to top]
Progression to Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
Diagnosed and graded according to standard established criteria. Measure is percent of patients with baseline scores of IIa (Group A) or IIb (Group B) who progressed to more severe GVHD (Grade III/IV). Percentage estimated by cumulative incidence methods. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: At approximately 100 days after transplant
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | 6 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | 13 |
[back to top]
Recurrent or Progressive Malignancy
Percentage of relapse estimated by cumulative incidence methods (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: At 12 months after the start of prednisone therapy
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | 21 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | 21 |
[back to top]
Secondary Therapy for Acute GVHD Beyond Prednisone
This includes any intervention intended to control acute GVHD through an immunosuppressive effect from oral or parenteral administration of any systemic medication not given previously. This does not include topical therapy, an increase in the dose of glucocorticoids or the resumption of treatment after previous discontinuation or any increase in the dose of immunosuppressive medication previously administered for GVHD prophylaxis, or reinstatement of GVHD prophylaxis previously discontinued. A change in treatment from cyclosporine to tacrolimus or vice versa because of drug toxicity is not considered secondary therapy, but any change made because of uncontrolled GVHD is considered secondary therapy. Percentage is estimated by cumulative incidence methods. (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: At approximately 100 days after transplant
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | 23 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | 7 |
[back to top]
Chronic Extensive GVHD
Percentage of patients with chronic extensive GVHD, estimated by cumulative incidence methods (NCT00929695)
Timeframe: At 12 months after the start of prednisone therapy
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Group A (Low-dose) | 47 |
Group B (Standard-dose) | 54 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the First Follow-up Visit
"The signs and symptoms of CD were rated on PGA 5-point scale (range, 0 - 4 scale): 0 - no clinically relevant reaction; 1- macular erythema with induration; 2 - weak (non-vesicular) reaction with erythema, infiltration, and possible papules; 3 - strong (edematous or vesicular) reaction; 4 - extreme (spreading, bullous, ulcerative) reaction. Success was defined as a score of 0 or 1 and failure was defined as a score of 2, 3, or 4." (NCT00929981)
Timeframe: First follow-up visit (between Day 6 to 10 after start of treatment)
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|
| Success | Failure |
---|
Medrol | 52.50 | 47.50 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline in Participant-rated Pruritus Score at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up Visits
Participant-rated pruritus score of lesions rated the severity of pruritus suffered in the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS where 0 = no pruritus and 10 = most severe possible pruritus. (NCT00929981)
Timeframe: Baseline,First Follow-up(between Day 6-10 of start of treatment),Second(Day 5-28),Third(between Day 6-10 after EOT),Final(between Day 25-35 after EOT)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Change at first follow-up | Change at second follow-up | Change at third follow-up | Change at final follow-up |
---|
Medrol | 7.3 | -4.2 | -6.3 | -7.1 | -7.2 |
[back to top]
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Final Follow-up Visit
"The signs and symptoms of CD were rated on PGA 5-point scale (range, 0 - 4 scale): 0 - no clinically relevant reaction; 1- macular erythema with induration; 2 - weak (non-vesicular) reaction with erythema, infiltration, and possible papules; 3 - strong (edematous or vesicular) reaction; 4 - extreme (spreading, bullous, ulcerative) reaction. Success was defined as a score of 0 or 1 and failure was defined as a score of 2, 3, or 4." (NCT00929981)
Timeframe: Final follow-up visit (between Day 25 to 35 after EOT)
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|
| Success | Failure |
---|
Medrol | 100.00 | 0 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline in Participant-rated Clinical Severity Score of Lesions at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up Visits
Participant-rated clinical severity score of lesions rated the severity of all symptoms in the past 24 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where 0 = No lesions and 10 = Most severe possible lesions. (NCT00929981)
Timeframe: Baseline,First Follow-up(between Day 6-10 of start of treatment),Second(Day 5-28),Third(between Day 6-10 after EOT),Final(between Day 25-35 after EOT)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Change at first follow-up | Change at second follow-up | Change at third follow-up | Change at final follow-up |
---|
Medrol | 6.8 | -4.1 | -6.2 | -6.7 | -6.8 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline in Investigator-rated Total Signs and Symptoms of CD Score at First, Second, Third and Final Follow-up Visits
Investigator-rated total signs and symptoms score of CD included pruritus, erythema, induration, vesiculation, edema or other specific sign or symptom rated on a 5 point scale of 0 - 4 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=extreme) with a total score of 0 - 20 (lower score was preferred). (NCT00929981)
Timeframe: Baseline,First Follow-up(between Day 6-10 of start of treatment),Second(Day 5-28),Third(between Day 6-10 after EOT),Final(between Day 25-35 after EOT)
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Change at first follow-up | Change at second follow-up | Change at third follow-up | Change at final follow-up |
---|
Medrol | 9.2 | -5.6 | -8.3 | -9.0 | -9.1 |
[back to top]
Treatment Status (Success/Failure) of CD at the Third Follow-up Visit
"The signs and symptoms of CD were rated on PGA 5-point scale (range, 0 - 4 scale): 0 - no clinically relevant reaction; 1- macular erythema with induration; 2 - weak (non-vesicular) reaction with erythema, infiltration, and possible papules; 3 - strong (edematous or vesicular) reaction; 4 - extreme (spreading, bullous, ulcerative) reaction. Success was defined as a score of 0 or 1 and failure was defined as a score of 2, 3, or 4." (NCT00929981)
Timeframe: Third follow-up visit (between Day 6 to 10 after EOT)
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|
| Success | Failure |
---|
Medrol | 100.00 | 0 |
[back to top]
Total Intake/Output of Fluid
Total amount of all fluids in and out during the first 36 hours postoperatively in mL. (NCT00934843)
Timeframe: over 36 hours
,
Intervention | mL (Mean) |
---|
| Total Fluid in at 36 hr | Total Fluid out at 36 hr |
---|
MP Single Dose | 575 | 600 |
MP Two Dose | 586 | 558 |
[back to top]
Urine Output
Total urine output in mL over the first 36 hours after cardiac surgery (NCT00934843)
Timeframe: over 36 hours
Intervention | mL (Mean) |
---|
MP Single Dose | 498 |
MP Two Dose | 453 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Who Died Between 36 Hours and 30 Days Following Cardiac Surgery
Number of participants who died of any cause between 36 hours and 30 days following cardiac surgery (NCT00934843)
Timeframe: at 36 hours and 30 days
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
MP Single Dose | 1 |
MP Two Dose | 0 |
[back to top]
Inotropic Score
The inotropic score was calculated by the equation using drug dosages in micrograms/kg/min, (dopamine+dobutamine) + (milrinonex10) + (epinephrinex100) and recorded hourly upon arrival to the ICUthrough 36 hours postoperatively. The highest score during this timeframe was recorded. This score converts dosages of commonly used inotropic medications into a score. The higher the score the more inotropic medications required. The minimum score would be zero indicating no inotropic medications were used. There is no maximum score. (NCT00934843)
Timeframe: over the first 36 hours after surgery
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|
MP Single Dose | 14.4 |
MP Two Dose | 15.0 |
[back to top]
Primary Endpoint: Number of Participants With Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS) or Death at 36 Hours From Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) After Surgery.
The presence of low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) was defined by the same definition used in the PRIMACORP study (Hoffman TM.et.al. Circulation 2003 107:996-1002). Specifically, if there were clinical signs and symptoms of low cardiac output (e.g., tachycardia, oliguria, cold extremities, cardiac arrest, etc.) which required one or more of the following interventions: mechanical circulatory support, the escalation of existing pharmacological circulatory support to >100% over baseline, or the initiation of new pharmacological circulatory support. (NCT00934843)
Timeframe: 36 hours
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
MP Single Dose | 17 |
MP Two Dose | 15 |
[back to top]
Pain(at 6 Months): Nirschl Staging
"NIRSCHL STAGING:~phase1: mild pain with exercise; resolves within 24 hours phase2: pain after exercise; exceeds 48 hours phase3: pain with exercise; does not alter activity phase4: pain with exercise; alters activity phase5: pain with heavy activities of daily living phase6: pain with light activities of daily living; intermittent pain at rest phase7: constant pain at rest; disrupts sleeps~No pain______1 ______ 2______ 3_______4______ 5______ 6 _____ 7 worst pain" (NCT00947765)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Autologous Blood Injection Group | 0.366 |
Local Corticosteroid Injection Group | 1.233 |
[back to top]
Pain (at 1 Week): Visual Analogue Scale(0 to 10)
"VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE:~Pain of the participants will be assessed by most widely used and accepted visual analogue scale. It consists of a 10 centimeter line marked at one end with no pain and at other end with worst pain ever. Participant is asked to indicate where on the line he or she rates the pain on the day of presentation, 1, 4, 12weeks and 6 month of follow-ups. Numerical valve is then given to it simply by measuring length between no pain to patients mark.~No pain____1___2___3___4___5___6___7___8___9___10 worst pain ever." (NCT00947765)
Timeframe: 1 week
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Autologous Blood Injection Group | 7.166 |
Local Corticosteroid Injection Group | 4.5 |
[back to top]
Pain(at 1 Week): Nirschl Staging (0 to 7)
"NIRSCHL STAGING:~phase1: mild pain with exercise; resolves within 24 hours phase2: pain after exercise; exceeds 48 hours phase3: pain with exercise; does not alter activity phase4: pain with exercise; alters activity phase5: pain with heavy activities of daily living phase6: pain with light activities of daily living; intermittent pain at rest phase7: constant pain at rest; disrupts sleeps~No pain______1 ______ 2______ 3_______4______ 5______ 6 _____ 7 worst pain" (NCT00947765)
Timeframe: 1 week
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Autologous Blood Injection Group | 5.1 |
Local Corticosteroid Injection Group | 3.06 |
[back to top]
Pain(at 12 Weeks): Nirschl Staging
"NIRSCHL STAGING:~phase1: mild pain with exercise; resolves within 24 hours phase2: pain after exercise; exceeds 48 hours phase3: pain with exercise; does not alter activity phase4: pain with exercise; alters activity phase5: pain with heavy activities of daily living phase6: pain with light activities of daily living; intermittent pain at rest phase7: constant pain at rest; disrupts sleeps~No pain______1 ______ 2______ 3_______4______ 5______ 6 _____ 7 worst pain" (NCT00947765)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Autologous Blood Injection Group | 0.433 |
Local Corticosteroid Injection Group | 1.03 |
[back to top]
Pain(at 12 Weeks): Visual Analogue Scale
"VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE:~Pain of the participants will be assessed by most widely used and accepted visual analogue scale. It consists of a 10 centimeter line marked at one end with no pain and at other end with worst pain ever. Participant is asked to indicate where on the line he or she rates the pain on the day of presentation, 1, 4, 12weeks and 6 month of follow-ups. Numerical valve is then given to it simply by measuring length between no pain to patients mark.~No pain____1 ___ 2 ___ 3 ___ 4 ___ 5 ___ 6 ___ 7 ___ 8 ___ 9 ___ 10 worst pain ever." (NCT00947765)
Timeframe: 12 weeks
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Autologous Blood Injection Group | 0.6 |
Local Corticosteroid Injection Group | 1.5 |
[back to top]
Pain(at 4 Weeks): Nirschl Staging
"NIRSCHL STAGING:~phase1: mild pain with exercise; resolves within 24 hours phase2: pain after exercise; exceeds 48 hours phase3: pain with exercise; does not alter activity phase4: pain with exercise; alters activity phase5: pain with heavy activities of daily living phase6: pain with light activities of daily living; intermittent pain at rest phase7: constant pain at rest; disrupts sleeps~No pain______1 ______ 2______ 3_______4______ 5______ 6 _____ 7 worst pain" (NCT00947765)
Timeframe: 4 weeks
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Autologous Blood Injection Group | 2.2 |
Local Corticosteroid Injection Group | 1.03 |
[back to top]
Pain(at 4 Weeks): Visual Analogue Scale
"VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE:~Pain of the participants will be assessed by most widely used and accepted visual analogue scale. It consists of a 10 centimeter line marked at one end with no pain and at other end with worst pain ever. Participant is asked to indicate where on the line he or she rates the pain on the day of presentation, 1, 4, 12weeks and 6 month of follow-ups. Numerical valve is then given to it simply by measuring length between no pain to patients mark.~No pain____1 ___ 2 ___ 3 ___ 4 ___ 5 ___ 6 ___ 7 ___ 8 ___ 9 ___ 10 worst pain ever." (NCT00947765)
Timeframe: 4 weeks
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Autologous Blood Injection Group | 3.2 |
Local Corticosteroid Injection Group | 1.533 |
[back to top]
Pain(at 6 Months): Visual Analogue Scale
"VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE:~Pain of the participants will be assessed by most widely used and accepted visual analogue scale. It consists of a 10 centimeter line marked at one end with no pain and at other end with worst pain ever. Participant is asked to indicate where on the line he or she rates the pain on the day of presentation, 1, 4, 12weeks and 6 month of follow-ups. Numerical valve is then given to it simply by measuring length between no pain to patients mark.~No pain____1 ___ 2 ___ 3 ___ 4 ___ 5 ___ 6 ___ 7 ___ 8 ___ 9 ___ 10 worst pain ever." (NCT00947765)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Autologous Blood Injection Group | 0.533 |
Local Corticosteroid Injection Group | 1.833 |
[back to top]
Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 2
"Testosterone was measured daily during the treatment week (treatment days 1 through 8). Serum testosterone was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 72-623 ng/dL.~Baseline testosterone was drawn before testosterone administration." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 2
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 980.86 |
Testosterone Gel | 526.71 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 191.87 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 675.86 |
[back to top]
Serum Total Testosterone Measured Before Treatment on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
"Testosterone was measured daily during the treatment week (treatment days 1 through 8). Serum testosterone was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 72-623 ng/dL.~Baseline testosterone was drawn before testosterone administration." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 307.57 |
Testosterone Gel | 363.43 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 408.17 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 318.68 |
[back to top]
Serum Estradiol Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Estradiol was measured during the treatment week (treatment days 1 and 8). Serum estradiol was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 20-47 pg/mL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 48.29 |
Testosterone Gel | 33.43 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 30.83 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 47.14 |
[back to top]
Serum Estradiol Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Estradiol was measured during the treatment week (treatment days 1 and 8). Serum estradiol was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 20-47 pg/mL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | pg/mL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 22.86 |
Testosterone Gel | 33.69 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 36.33 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 34.71 |
[back to top]
Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 4
"Testosterone was measured daily during the treatment week (treatment days 1 through 8). Serum testosterone was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 72-623 ng/dL.~Baseline testosterone was drawn before testosterone administration." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 4
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 779.57 |
Testosterone Gel | 441.71 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 271.6 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 734.57 |
[back to top]
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) was measured during the treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). CRP was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 0.0 - 0.8 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 0.47 |
Testosterone Gel | 0.33 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 0.32 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 0.4 |
[back to top]
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). PSA was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are less than 4.0 ng/mL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 1.98 |
Testosterone Gel | 2.32 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 1.78 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 2.07 |
[back to top]
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). PSA was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are less than 4.0 ng/mL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 1.92 |
Testosterone Gel | 2.33 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 1.85 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 1.83 |
[back to top]
Low-Density Lipoproteins (LDL) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL) was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). LDL was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are less than 160 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 104.0 |
Testosterone Gel | 94.57 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 87.5 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 75.14 |
[back to top]
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) was measured during the treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). CRP was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 0.0 - 0.8 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 0.47 |
Testosterone Gel | 0.31 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 0.32 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 0.3 |
[back to top]
Insulin Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Insulin was measured before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. Insulin was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal range is less than 25 uIu/mL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | uIu/mL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 7.47 |
Testosterone Gel | 10.58 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 3.92 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 3.89 |
[back to top]
Insulin Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Insulin was measured before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. Insulin was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal range is less than 25 uIu/mL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | uIu/mL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 8.53 |
Testosterone Gel | 10.28 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 4.09 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 9.89 |
[back to top]
Insulin Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) was measured before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. IGF-1 was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal range is 33-220 ng/mL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 80.16 |
Testosterone Gel | 72.11 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 69.17 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 54.86 |
[back to top]
Cortisol Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) AFTER Exercise Protocol
Cortisol was measured before and immediately after the exercise protocol, before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. Serum Cortisol was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal range is 5-25 ug/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1 - after exercise
Intervention | ug/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 7.71 |
Testosterone Gel | 7.20 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 4.76 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 4.15 |
[back to top]
Very Low-Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). VLDL was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 5-60 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 28 |
Testosterone Gel | 33.14 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 24.67 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 23.86 |
[back to top]
Triglycerides Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Triglycerides were measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). Total cholesterol was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 30-170 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 112.57 |
Testosterone Gel | 160.0 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 155.17 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 116.28 |
[back to top]
Triglycerides Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Triglycerides were measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). Total cholesterol was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 30-170 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 140.42 |
Testosterone Gel | 164.0 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 122.5 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 119.71 |
[back to top]
Total Cholesterol Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Total Cholesterol was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). Total cholesterol was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 120-200 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 172 |
Testosterone Gel | 162.86 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 166.17 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 141.86 |
[back to top]
Total Cholesterol Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Total Cholesterol was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). Total cholesterol was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 120-200 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 171.29 |
Testosterone Gel | 165.57 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 168.00 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 156.71 |
[back to top]
Insulin Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) was measured before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. IGF-1 was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal range is 33-220 ng/mL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 71.77 |
Testosterone Gel | 69.2 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 61.42 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 90.74 |
[back to top]
High-Density Lipoproteins (HDL) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
High Density Lipoproteins (HDL) was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). HDL was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are higher than 35 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 41.29 |
Testosterone Gel | 36.71 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 47.67 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 43.43 |
[back to top]
High-Density Lipoproteins (HDL) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
High Density Lipoproteins (HDL) was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). HDL was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are higher than 35 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 40.29 |
Testosterone Gel | 38.86 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 46.50 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 42.14 |
[back to top]
Hematocrit Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Hematocrit was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). Hematocrit was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 38.4% - 49.3%. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | percent (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 38.74 |
Testosterone Gel | 37.23 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 40.53 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 39.24 |
[back to top]
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) was measured before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. SHBG was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal ranges are 10-57 nmol/L. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | nmol/L (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 21.78 |
Testosterone Gel | 19.86 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 25.66 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 24.70 |
[back to top]
Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
"Testosterone was measured daily during the treatment week (treatment days 1 through 8). Serum testosterone was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 72-623 ng/dL.~Baseline testosterone was drawn before testosterone administration." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 454.29 |
Testosterone Gel | 435.14 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 340.17 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 481.14 |
[back to top]
Low-Density Lipoproteins (LDL) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Low Density Lipoproteins (LDL) was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). LDL was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are less than 160 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 103.0 |
Testosterone Gel | 93.57 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 96.83 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 90.71 |
[back to top]
Hematocrit Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Hematocrit was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). Hematocrit was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 38.4% - 49.3%. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | percent (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 39.17 |
Testosterone Gel | 38.4 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 40.45 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 39.86 |
[back to top]
Global Fatigue Score as Measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) in the Pre-treatment Week
"The Brief Fatigue Inventory is a 9 item questionnaire that assesses perceptual fatigue as well as fatigue interferences (e.g. interference with enjoyment of life), with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being as bad as you can imagine. The Global Fatigue score is calculated by averaging the answers of all the questions.~This data is presented as the pre-treatment week average of study days -7 to -1." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: Study days -7 to -1 (Pre - treatment)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 2.25 |
Testosterone Gel | 1.47 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 2.26 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 1.86 |
[back to top]
Global Fatigue Score as Measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) During the Treatment Week
"The Brief Fatigue Inventory is a 9 item questionnaire that assesses perceptual fatigue as well as fatigue interferences (e.g. interference with enjoyment of life), with 0 being no fatigue and 10 being as bad as you can imagine. The Global Fatigue score is calculated by averaging the answers of all the questions.~This data is presented as the treatment week average of study days 1-8." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: Study days 1-7 (treatment week)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 1.84 |
Testosterone Gel | 1.79 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 2.19 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 1.57 |
[back to top]
Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) was measured before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. DHEA-S was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal ranges are 28-290 ug/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | ug/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 37.96 |
Testosterone Gel | 35.54 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 34.74 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 36.07 |
[back to top]
Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEA-S) Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study)
Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) was measured before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. DHEA-S was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal ranges are 28-290 ug/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1
Intervention | ug/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 46.34 |
Testosterone Gel | 34.16 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 62.55 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 46.07 |
[back to top]
Very Low-Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Very Low Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) was measured before and after treatment week (study treatment days 1 and 8). VLDL was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 5-60 mg/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 26.71 |
Testosterone Gel | 29.29 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 31.0 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 24.71 |
[back to top]
Cortisol Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) BEFORE Exercise Protocol
Cortisol was measured before and immediately after the exercise protocol, before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. Serum Cortisol was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal range is 5-25 ug/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8 - before exercise
Intervention | ug/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 7.84 |
Testosterone Gel | 5.97 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 6.28 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 5.19 |
[back to top]
Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 7
"Testosterone was measured daily during the treatment week (treatment days 1 through 8). Serum testosterone was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 72-623 ng/dL.~Baseline testosterone was drawn before testosterone administration." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 7
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 578.29 |
Testosterone Gel | 485.86 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 320.0 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 579.57 |
[back to top]
Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 6
"Testosterone was measured daily during the treatment week (treatment days 1 through 8). Serum testosterone was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 72-623 ng/dL.~Baseline testosterone was drawn before testosterone administration." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 6
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 629.0 |
Testosterone Gel | 536.43 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 284.5 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 645.14 |
[back to top]
Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 5
"TesTestosterone was measured daily during the treatment week (treatment days 1 through 8). Serum testosterone was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 72-623 ng/dL.~Baseline testosterone was drawn before testosterone administration." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 5
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 722.0 |
Testosterone Gel | 460.14 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 246.33 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 669.71 |
[back to top]
Serum Total Testosterone Measured on Treatment Day 3
"TTestosterone was measured daily during the treatment week (treatment days 1 through 8). Serum testosterone was analyzed by UTMB clinical laboratory. Normal ranges are 72-623 ng/dL.~Baseline testosterone was drawn before testosterone administration." (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 3
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 828.71 |
Testosterone Gel | 527.43 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 206.0 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 673.29 |
[back to top]
Cortisol Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study) AFTER Exercise Protocol
Cortisol was measured before and immediately after the exercise protocol, before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. Serum Cortisol was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal range is 5-25 ug/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8 - after exercise
Intervention | ug/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 7.05 |
Testosterone Gel | 6.28 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 4.40 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 5.78 |
[back to top]
Cortisol Measured on Treatment Day 1 (Baseline Study) BEFORE Exercise Protocol
Cortisol was measured before and immediately after the exercise protocol, before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. Serum Cortisol was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal range is 5-25 ug/dL. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 1 - before exercise
Intervention | ug/dL (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 7.25 |
Testosterone Gel | 6.00 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 6.64 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 6.28 |
[back to top]
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) Measured on Treatment Day 8 (Post Study)
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) was measured before and after the treatment week on study treatment days 1 and 8. SHBG was analyzed by immunoassay on a Siemens Immulite 2000. Normal ranges are 10-57 nmol/L. (NCT00957801)
Timeframe: treatment day 8
Intervention | nmol/L (Mean) |
---|
Testosterone Injection | 17.62 |
Testosterone Gel | 20.13 |
Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 19.22 |
Testosterone Injection and Medrol 6 Day Dose Pack | 14.57 |
[back to top]
Participant Responses by Daily Dose Level Assignment (RAD001 5 mg, 10 mg and MTD 5 mg)
Response defined as Complete remission (CR): Disappearance of all clinical and/or radiologic evidence of disease. Neutrophil count > 1.0 x10^9/L, platelet count > 100 x10^9/L, and blasts < 5% in a normocellular or hypercellular marrow. Complete remission without platelet recovery (CRp): Peripheral blood and marrow parameters as for CR, but with platelet count > 20 x 10^9/L and < 100 x 10^9/L in the absence of platelet transfusions. CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): Same as CR but platelets ≤ 100,000/mcl and/or neutrophils ≤ 1,000/mcl. Partial remission (PR): Peripheral blood count recovery as for CR, with decrease in marrow blasts by > 50% from pretreatment values with no more than 25% leukemia/lymphoma cells in the marrow. Nonresponder, Other: All other responses will be considered failures. (NCT00968253)
Timeframe: Up to 20 cycles of study drugs (21 day cycles) or till disease progression
,,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Complete Remission | Complete Remission without platelet recovery | CR with incomplete blood count recovery | Partial Remission | Nonresponder |
---|
Phase I: RAD001 10 mg + Combination Chemo | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Phase I: RAD001 5 mg + Combination Chemo | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Phase II: MTD RAD001 + Combination Chemo | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
[back to top]
Overall Response Rate (OR) Where OR = CR + CRp + CRi
Number of participants out of total treated who experienced a complete response response according to RECIST criteria either (CR + CRp) CR Without Platelet Recovery. Response (CR + CRp) defined as Complete remission (CR): Disappearance of all clinical and/or radiologic evidence of disease. Neutrophil count > 1.0 x10^9/L, platelet count > 100 x10^9/L, and blasts < 5% in a normocellular or hypercellular marrow. Complete remission without platelet recovery (CRp): Peripheral blood and marrow parameters as for CR, but with platelet count > 20 x 10^9/L and < 100 x 10^9/L in the absence of platelet transfusions. CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi): Same as CR but platelets ≤ 100,000/mcl and/or neutrophils ≤ 1,000/mcl. (NCT00968253)
Timeframe: 8 courses of treatment, up to 24 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Phase I: RAD001 5 mg + Combination Chemo | 33 |
Phase I: RAD001 10 mg + Combination Chemo | 33 |
Phase II: MTD RAD001 + Combination Chemo | 33 |
[back to top]
Maximum Tolerated Dose [MTD] Determination by Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
"The Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was the highest dose level at which fewer than 2 of 6 patients developed a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first two cycles of therapy. A 3 by 3 design was used for dose escalation in the phase I portion of the study.~A dose-limiting toxic effect (DLT) was defined as a clinically significant adverse event or abnormal laboratory value directly attributable to everolimus and assessed as unrelated to disease progression, intercurrent illness, or concomitant medications, occurring during the first or second cycle of therapy, that met any of the following criteria: CTCAE version 3.0 grade 3 increased AST or ALT for 7 days, CTCAE grade 4 increased AST or ALT of any duration, or any other clinically significant CTCAE grade 3 or 4 toxic effect. Electrolyte abnormalities (changes in glucose, chemistries, liver enzymes, pancreatic enzymes) correctable by optimal therapy and without clinical impact were not considered DLTs." (NCT00968253)
Timeframe: Following first two dose cycles (21 days/each), up to 42 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Phase I: RAD001 5 mg + Combination Chemo | 0 |
Phase I: RAD001 10 mg + Combination Chemo | 1 |
[back to top]
Time to Flare Comparing Patients With (at Baseline) British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (BILAG) >/= 17 (Severe Disease) to Those With BILAG < 17 (Moderate Disease Activity).
(NCT00987831)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | days to flare (Median) |
---|
Severe Disease Activity at Baseline | 40 |
Moderate Disease Activity at Baseline | 72.5 |
[back to top]
Time to Flare Comparing Patients With Moderate vs Severe Disease Activity at Baseline
Group A only: patients on immunosuppressive treatments had them withdrawn at baseline. All patients were allowed up to 160 mg depomedrol at baseline which could be repeated within two weeks up to a total of 4 shots maximum or until satisfactory improvement. Time to flare was calculated from baseline. moderate disease at baseline was defined as up to 3 BILAG B (moderate disease) organ scores, no BILAG A (severe disease) score and a SLEDAI 3 BILAG B, OR at least one BILAG A OR SLEDAI > 10 or meeting criteria for a severe flare on the SELENA SLEDAI flare index. At baseline 25 patients with moderate disease. 16 patients had severe disease. Note: severe rash with A on BILAG is only SLEDAI=2, explaining some discrepancies in measures (NCT00987831)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | days to flare (Median) |
---|
Severe Disease Activity at Baseline | 45 |
Moderate Disease Activity at Baseline | 71 |
[back to top]
Change in Bone Density (in Participants Untreated With Bisphosphonates)
Bone mineral density test was performed using x-ray radiation and the values of bone density were provided directly by the apparatus as grams per square centimeter (g/cm^2) . T-score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for a healthy 30 year old adult of the same sex and ethnicity as the participant. A T-score with above -1 is normal bone density level. A T-score between -1 and -2.5 means that the bone density is below normal and it might be a sign of an osteopenia and may also lead into osteoporosis. A T-score below -2.5 indicates osteoporosis. (NCT01000610)
Timeframe: Screening and Week 84
Intervention | t-score (Number) |
---|
| Screening | Week 84 |
---|
Rituximab | -1.82 | -1.6 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs)
(NCT01000610)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15, every 8 weeks up to Week 24 and and then every 3 months up to 18 months for a total of 104 weeks
Intervention | number of participants (Number) |
---|
| Participants who experienced an AE | Participants who experienced more than 1 AE |
---|
Rituximab | 11 | 7 |
[back to top]
Percentage Change in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) From Baseline to Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: [VAS] 0 equals (=) no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to 10. Scores less than (<) 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores greater than or equal to (≥) 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6. The average improvement at each visit to the group score is equal to the formula (Previous DAS28 minus [-] current DAS 28)/ Previous DAS 28 x 100. Negative percentages indicate that the participant has worsened in comparison to last evaluation, and positive percentages indicate improvement of its DAS28 score and correlated with a bettering of clinical situation. (NCT01000610)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | percentage change from baseline (Mean) |
---|
Rituximab | -1.7 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Whose DAS28 Improved by >1.2 at Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity calculated using the TJC [28 joints], SJC [28 joints], participant's global assessment of disease activity [VAS: 0 = no disease activity to 100 = maximum disease activity] and the ESR for a total possible score of 0 to 10. Scores < 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores ≥ 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6. An improvement of >1.2 was considered to be clinically significant improvement. (NCT01000610)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Rituximab | 75.0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'. (NCT01085097)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 28
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Placebo | 14 |
Laquinimod 0.5 mg | 15 |
Laquinimod 1 mg | 15 |
[back to top]
Percent Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at Week 24
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. (NCT01085097)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Mean) |
---|
Placebo | 12.1 |
Laquinimod 0.5 mg | 18.0 |
Laquinimod 1 mg | 24.3 |
[back to top]
Recurrence or Relapse
Number of subjects that had disease recurrence (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: two years post transplant
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 2 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival
Number of participants alive at 180 days post engraftment. (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: On day +180
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 8 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival
Number of participants that were alive. (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: At 2 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 4 |
[back to top]
Recurrence or Relapse
Number of subjects that had disease recurrence (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: one year in patients post UCBT
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 2 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival
Number of participants that were alive. (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: At 1 year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 6 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
Disease Free
Number of participants that were disease free (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: At 2 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 4 |
[back to top]
Disease Free
Number of participants that were disease free (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: At 1 year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 4 |
[back to top]
Incidence of Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD)
Number of participants that had acute GVHD (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: At 100 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 11 |
[back to top]
Occurrence of Serious Infections
Number of participants that had infections (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: 1 year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 13 |
[back to top]
Incidence of Chronic GVHD
Number of participants that have chronic GVHD. Chronic GVHD will be diagnosed and graded on clinical and histological criteria from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: At 1 year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 1 |
[back to top]
Hematologic Engraftment
Number of participants that were able to complete engraftment by day 42. (NCT01093586)
Timeframe: On day +42
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm I | 10 |
[back to top]
Time to Disease Progression
Time from study entry until progressive disease or data collection cutoff. (NCT01105650)
Timeframe: 1 Year
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|
Arm 1: CsA | 52 |
Arm 2: CsA/Methylprednisolone (10mg)/6 Doses of Interleukin-2 | 98 |
Arm 3: CsA/Methylprednisolone (1mg)/6 Doses of Interleukin-2 | 100 |
[back to top]
Response Rate
Response includes Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), and Stable Disease (SD) as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v.1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI. Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease. (NCT01105650)
Timeframe: Month 3
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Arm 1: CsA | 1 |
Arm 2: CsA/Methylprednisolone (10mg)/6 Doses of Interleukin-2 | 2 |
Arm 3: CsA/Methylprednisolone (1mg)/6 Doses of Interleukin-2 | 4 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival
Number of participants alive at 1 year. (NCT01105650)
Timeframe: 1 Year
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Arm 1: CsA | 0 |
Arm 2: CsA/Methylprednisolone (10mg)/6 Doses of Interleukin-2 | 1 |
Arm 3: CsA/Methylprednisolone (1mg)/6 Doses of Interleukin-2 | 3 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Progressive Disease at One Year
(NCT01105650)
Timeframe: 1 Year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Arm 1: CsA | 2 |
Arm 2: CsA/Methylprednisolone (10mg)/6 Doses of Interleukin-2 | 1 |
Arm 3: CsA/Methylprednisolone (1mg)/6 Doses of Interleukin-2 | 5 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC
Vital signs assessment included pulse rate, blood pressure, temperature and respiratory rate. Criteria for vital sign values meeting potential clinical concern included: supine pulse rate <40 or >110 beats per minute (bpm), >= 15 increase from baseline and >= 30 decrease from baseline; systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 85 and > 160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg), >= 20 mmHg increase from baseline and >= 40 mmHg decrease from baseline; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 45 and > 100 mm Hg, >= 10 mmHg increase from baseline and >= 20 mmHg decrease from baseline. (NCT01114503)
Timeframe: Up to Month 24 (Long term follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Otelixizumab Cohort A1 | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Thyroid Function Assessment, Hormone and Glucose Assay Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC
The following laboratory parameters were analyzed: thyroid function assessment (thyroid stimulating hormone [TSH], thyroid peroxidase antibody, thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TSH-R-Abs) or TSH-binding inhibiting immunoglobulin (TBII), free thyroxine [fT4], free triiodothyronine [fT3]; hormone and glucose assays (cortisol, adrenocorticotrophic hormone [ACTH], insulin-like growth factor [IgF-1] and plasma glucose. Thyroid function tests were done at Day 1 (pre-dose) and Week 4-24. Hormone and glucose assays were done at Day 1 (pre-dose) and Week 2-24. (NCT01114503)
Timeframe: Up to Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Otelixizumab Cohort A1 | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Laboratory Urinalysis Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC
The urinalysis parameters included pH, glucose, protein, blood and ketones by dipstic and microscopy (if urine dipstick was positive for blood or protein). The assessments were done at Day 1 (pre dose), Day 8, Week 2-24, Month 12 and 24. (NCT01114503)
Timeframe: Up to Month 24 (Long term follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Otelixizumab Cohort A1 | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Laboratory Hematology Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC
The PCC range for hematology parameters included white blood cell count, low- < 3 giga cells (GI)/L, high- > 20 GI/L; neutrophil count, low- < 1.5 GI/L; hemoglobin, low- > 25 g/L change from baseline, high- 180 g/L; hematocrit, low- > 0.075 L change from baseline, high- 0.54 L; platelet count, low- < 100 GI/L, high- >550 GI/L and lymphocytes, low < 0.8 GI/L. The assessments were done at Day 1 (pre dose), Day 8, Week 2-24, Month 12 and 24. (NCT01114503)
Timeframe: Upto Month 24 (Long term follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Otelixizumab Cohort A1 | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Laboratory Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)
The PCC range for clinical chemistry parameters included albumin, <30 gram per liter (g/L); calcium, low- < 2.0 millimole (mmol)/L: high->2.75 mmol/L; creatinine, high- > 1.3x ULN mmol/L or > 159 micromole (μmol)/L or > 44 μmol/L change from Baseline; glucose, low- < 3.0 mmol/L, high- > 9.0 0 mmol/L; magnesium, low- < 0.5 mmol/L, high- > 1.23 mmol/L, phosphorus, low- < 0.8 mmol/L, high- > 1.6 mmol/L; potassium, Low- < 3.0 mmol/L, high- > 5.5 mmol/L; sodium, low- < 130 mmol/L, high- > 150 mmol/L; bicarbonate, low- < 18 mmol/L, high- > 32 mmol/L; alanine aminotransferase, high->= 2x ULN, where the normal range was (NR) 0 - 39 international units (IU)/L; aspartate aminotransferase, high- >= 2x ULN, where NR was 0 - 39 IU/L; alkaline phosphatase, high- >= 1.5x ULN, where NR was 35 - 120 IU/L; total bilirubin- >= 1.5x ULN, where NR was 0 - 18 μmol/L.The assessments were done at Day 1 (pre dose), Day 8, Week 2-24 and Month 12 and 24. (NCT01114503)
Timeframe: Up to Month 24 (Long term follow-up)
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Otelixizumab Cohort A1 | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC
ECG parameters included pulse rate (PR) interval, QRS interval, QT interval, corrected QT interval using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and corrected QT interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF). Criteria for ECG changes meeting potential clinical concern included: PR interval <110 and >220 milliseconds (msec); QRS interval <75 and >110 msec; QTc interval >480 to <= 500 msec, increase from baseline QTc >30 to <= 60 msec. (NCT01114503)
Timeframe: Screening (Day -35 to Day -1)
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Otelixizumab Cohort A1 | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With an Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Viral Load Abnormalities Meeting the Criteria for PCC
The PCC range for EBV viral load was > 10,000 copies of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) per million lymphocytes. The assessments were done at Week 2, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12. (NCT01114503)
Timeframe: Week 2 to Week 12
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Otelixizumab Cohort A1 | 0 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Hypopyon
Hypopyon was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Hypopyon (pus in the anterior chamber of the eye) is a sign of ocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Corneal Clarity
Corneal clarity was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Lack of corneal clarity (1-3) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 92.3 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 94.9 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 94.9 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.4 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 87.5 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 90.0 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 90.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Conjunctival Injection
Conjunctival injection was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Conjunctival injection (redness of the white sclera of the eye) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 46.2 | 48.7 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 79.5 | 20.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 89.7 | 10.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.4 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 25.0 | 65.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 77.5 | 22.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 92.5 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 95.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Anterior Chamber Cell Grade
Anterior chamber cell grade was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 5-point scale: Grade 0=0 cells; Grade 1=1 to 10 cells; Grade 2=11 to 20 cells; Grade 3=21 to 50 cells; Grade 4=>50 cells. The presence of blood cells (red and white) in the anterior chamber of the eye (the fluid-filled space inside the eye between the iris and the cornea's innermost surface) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 1: Grade 4 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 4 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 4 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 4 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | 1 Week After Last Dose: Grade 4 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 4 |
---|
DUREZOL | 23.7 | 57.9 | 15.8 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 55.3 | 36.8 | 5.3 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 78.9 | 18.4 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 89.5 | 10.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.4 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 94.7 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 40.0 | 30.0 | 27.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 57.5 | 32.5 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 77.5 | 17.5 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 95.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 95.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Lacrimation
Lacrimation was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Excessive lacrimation (tear production and secretion, 1-3) is a symptom of ocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 64.1 | 30.8 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 94.9 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 72.5 | 22.5 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 95.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Photophobia
Photophobia was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Photophobia (abnormal intolerance to visual perception of light) is a symptom of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 71.8 | 20.5 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 89.7 | 10.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.4 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.4 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 60.0 | 35.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 87.5 | 10.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 95.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 92.5 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 97.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Wound Integrity
Wound integrity was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Lack of wound integrity (healing, 1-3) is a sign of inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 1: Grade 0 | Month 1: Grade 1 | Month 1: Grade 2 | Month 1: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment Score of Postoperative Inflammation by Visit
A Global Assessment Score (GAS) was assigned by the Investigator based on the clinical evidence of postoperative inflammation: 0=clear, 1=improving satisfactorily; 2=not improving or worsening, withdrawal from study indicated to allow appropriate alternative therapy to be instituted. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 |
---|
DUREZOL | 30.8 | 69.2 | 0.0 | 48.7 | 48.7 | 2.6 | 56.4 | 43.6 | 0.0 | 79.5 | 20.5 | 0.0 | 89.7 | 7.7 | 2.6 | 92.3 | 5.1 | 2.6 |
PRED FORTE | 17.5 | 82.5 | 0.0 | 25.0 | 70.0 | 5.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 72.5 | 25.0 | 2.5 | 90.0 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 92.5 | 7.5 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Patients With an Anterior Cell Grade of 0 (no Cells) at Day 15 ± 2 Days
Anterior cell grade was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 5-point scale: Grade 0=0 cells; Grade 1=1 to 10 cells; Grade 2=11 to 20 cells; Grade 3=21 to 50 cells; Grade 4=>50 cells. The presence of blood cells (red and white) in the anterior chamber of the eye (the fluid-filled space inside the eye between the iris and the cornea's innermost surface) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 15 ± 2 days
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
DUREZOL | 78.9 |
PRED FORTE | 77.5 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Anterior Chamber Flare Grade
Anterior chamber flare was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. The presence of flare (increased protein levels) in the anterior chamber of the eye (the fluid-filled space inside the eye between the iris and the cornea's innermost surface) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 41.0 | 51.3 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 61.5 | 35.9 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 74.4 | 17.9 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 87.2 | 12.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 94.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 92.3 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 45.0 | 37.5 | 12.5 | 5.0 | 52.5 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 70.0 | 27.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 92.5 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 92.5 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 95.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Chemosis
Chemosis was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Chemosis (swelling of the conjunctiva) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 82.1 | 15.4 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 97.4 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 85.0 | 15.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Ciliary/Limbal Injection
Ciliary/limbal injection was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Ciliary/limbal injection (redness of the white sclera of the eye near the limbal ring) is a sign of intraocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 69.2 | 28.2 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 89.7 | 10.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 57.5 | 40.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 90.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Global Assessment of Inflammation - Individual Component Scoring by Visit: Vitritis
Vitritis was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp or ophthalmoscopy/light examination and graded on a 4-point scale: 0=absent; 1=mild; 2=moderate; 3=severe. Vitritis (accumulation of inflammatory cells or exudates in the vitreous humor, the fluid that fills the middle chamber of the eye) is a sign of ocular inflammation. A score of 0 indicates an absence of inflammation. For this outcome measure, percentage of patients by grade and visit is reported. (NCT01124045)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 8 ± 1 day, Day 15 ± 2 days, Day 29 ± 2 days, 1 Week after Last Dose + 2 days, 3 Months + 1 week
,
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Day 1: Grade 0 | Day 1: Grade 1 | Day 1: Grade 2 | Day 1: Grade 3 | Day 8: Grade 0 | Day 8: Grade 1 | Day 8: Grade 2 | Day 8: Grade 3 | Day 15: Grade 0 | Day 15: Grade 1 | Day 15: Grade 2 | Day 15: Grade 3 | Day 29: Grade 0 | Day 29: Grade 1 | Day 29: Grade 2 | Day 29: Grade 3 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 0 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 1 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 2 | 1 Week after Last Dose: Grade 3 | Month 3: Grade 0 | Month 3: Grade 1 | Month 3: Grade 2 | Month 3: Grade 3 |
---|
DUREZOL | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
PRED FORTE | 97.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 97.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Change in Levels of Serum IL-6
(NCT01144143)
Timeframe: Change from Day 0 to Day 56
Intervention | pg/ml (Mean) |
---|
Infliximab | -0.4 |
Salt Water | 8.1 |
Methylprednisolone Acetate | 5.5 |
[back to top]
Change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Score Target Knee
The WOMAC questionnaire is used to evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis. Patients answer questions based on how they are feeling. The questionnaire has a total of 24 questions which deal with pain, stiffness and physical function. Participants are asked to respond to how difficult it is for them to do/complete an activity. There is a total possible score of 96. A score of 0 equals no difficulty completing any of the 24 activities. A score of 96 would indicate extreme difficulty with all activities. (NCT01144143)
Timeframe: Change from Day 0 to Day 56
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Infliximab | -25.9 |
Normal Saline | -9.3 |
Methylprednisolone Acetate | 2.0 |
[back to top]
Change in Joint Effusions From Day 0 to Day 56 Target Knee
"Outcome calculated based on Physician observation of joint swelling from 0-3. A score of 0 = no effusion,1 = positive bulge, 2 = moderate effusion, 3 = tense effusion. The outcome represents the change in means between the two time points." (NCT01144143)
Timeframe: Change from Day 0 to Day 56
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Infliximab | 0.3 |
Salt Water | 0.0 |
Methylprednisolone Acetate | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Change in Serum CRP Day 0 to Day 56
Serum measure of systemic inflammation (NCT01144143)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Day 56
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) |
---|
Infliximab | -0.18 |
Salt Water | -0.15 |
Methylprednisolone Acetate | 0.08 |
[back to top]
Change in Serum SAA Levels Day 0 to Day 56
Serum Amyloid A (NCT01144143)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Day 56
Intervention | ug/ml (Mean) |
---|
Infliximab | -1.0 |
Salt Water | -715.6 |
Methylprednisolone Acetate | -1580.2 |
[back to top]
Proportion of Subjects With Anterior Chamber Cell Count ≤5 and Flare Grade of 0
Inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber were assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination and recorded based on actual cell count. Anterior chamber flare (protein escaping from dialated vessels) was assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination and graded on a 5-point scale, with 0 = none; 1 = mild (trace to clearly noticeable, visible); 2 = moderate; 3 = marked; and 4 = severe. Proportion is reported as percentage of subjects. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42
,
Intervention | Percentage of subjects (Number) |
---|
| Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 |
---|
Durezol | 13.0 | 41.3 | 78.3 | 82.6 | 80.4 | 82.6 | 80.4 |
Pred Forte | 14.9 | 40.4 | 61.7 | 76.6 | 76.6 | 76.6 | 78.7 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Slit-Lamp Total Sign Score at All Visits
The following signs were each graded on a 0 - 3 scale (0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe): posterior synechia, hypopyon, limbal injection, and keratic precipitates. Peripheral synechia was graded by the combined number of clock hours affected (0 = absent; 1 = < 3 hrs; 2 = 3-6 hours; 3 = > 6 hours). The total sign score was calculated as the sum of the 5 individual sign scores, the anterior chamber cell grade and the anterior chamber flare grade. The minimum/best total sign score was 0, and the maximum/worst total sign score was 23. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42
,
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline (Day 0) | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 |
---|
Durezol | 7.1 | -3.5 | -5.2 | -6.1 | -6.5 | -6.4 | -6.3 | -6.2 |
Pred Forte | 7.3 | -3.6 | -5.0 | -5.8 | -6.2 | -6.2 | -6.2 | -6.3 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Anterior Chamber Flare Grade at All Time Points
Anterior chamber flare (protein escaping from dialated vessels) was assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination and graded on a 5-point scale, with 0 = none; 1 = mild (trace to clearly noticeable, visible); 2 = moderate; 3 = marked; and 4 = severe. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42
,
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline (Day 0) | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 |
---|
Durezol | 2.2 | -1.1 | -1.6 | -2.0 | -2.0 | -2.0 | -2.0 | -2.0 |
Pred Forte | 2.3 | -1.2 | -1.6 | -1.9 | -2.0 | -2.0 | -2.0 | -2.0 |
[back to top]
Proportion of Subjects With Anterior Chamber Cell Count of 0
Inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber were assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination and recorded based on actual cell count. Proportion is reported as a percentage of subjects. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42
,
Intervention | Percentage of subjects (Number) |
---|
| Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 |
---|
Durezol | 13.0 | 21.7 | 52.2 | 73.9 | 73.9 | 69.6 | 69.6 |
Pred Forte | 2.1 | 21.3 | 38.3 | 48.9 | 63.8 | 63.8 | 68.1 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Anterior Chamber Cell Grade at Day 14
Inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber were assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination and graded on a 5-point scale, with 0 = ≤ 1 cell count; 1 = 2 to 10 cell count; 2 = 11 to 20 cell count; 3 = 21 to 50 cell count; and 4 = > 50 cell count. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Day 14
,
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline (Day 0) | Day 14 |
---|
Durezol | 2.6 | -2.2 |
Pred Forte | 2.6 | -2.0 |
[back to top]
Proportion of Subjects Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
Lack of efficacy was defined as those subjects who discontinued study participation either due to treatment failure or an adverse event with a preferred term of iridocyclitis, iritis, uveitis, or vitritis. Proportion is reported as percentage of subjects. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Time to Event
Intervention | Percentage of subjects (Number) |
---|
Durezol | 0 |
Pred Forte | 14.9 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Total Symptom Score at All Time Points
The following symptoms were each graded by the subject according to a 0-100 visual analog scale (VAS) using a mark on a 100 mm line (0 = absent, 100 = maximal): eye pain, photophobia, blurred vision, and lacrimation. The total symptom score was calculated as the sum of the 4 individual symptom scores. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42
,
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline (Day 0) | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 |
---|
Durezol | 186.7 | -88.4 | -108.2 | -133.3 | -138.8 | -140.1 | -143.9 | -146.2 |
Pred Forte | 203.2 | -88.4 | -123.8 | -137.4 | -149.5 | -152.4 | -147.3 | -155.5 |
[back to top]
Proportion of Subjects With Anterior Chamber Cell Grade of 0
Inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber were assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination and graded on a 5-point scale, with 0 = ≤ 1 cell count; 1 = 2 to 10 cell count; 2 = 11 to 20 cell count; 3 = 21 to 50 cell count; and 4 = > 50 cell count. Proportion is reported as percentage of subjects. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42
,
Intervention | Percentage of subjects (Number) |
---|
| Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 |
---|
Durezol | 15.2 | 34.8 | 65.2 | 84.8 | 80.4 | 78.3 | 76.1 |
Pred Forte | 6.4 | 25.5 | 55.3 | 63.8 | 70.2 | 70.2 | 74.5 |
[back to top]
Proportion of Subjects With Anterior Chamber Cell Grade ≤1
As assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination. Anterior chamber cell grade was graded on a 5-point scale, with 0 = no cells; 1 = 1 to 10 cells; 2 = 11 to 20 cells; 3 = 21 to 50 cells; and 4 = more than 50 cells. Proportion is reported as percentage of subjects. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42
,
Intervention | Percentage of subjects (Number) |
---|
| Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 |
---|
Durezol | 50.0 | 87.0 | 93.5 | 93.5 | 93.5 | 93.5 | 91.3 |
Pred Forte | 57.4 | 80.9 | 85.1 | 89.4 | 87.2 | 85.1 | 85.1 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Day 0) in Anterior Chamber Cell Grade at All Time Points Other Than Day 14
Inflammatory cells in the anterior chamber were assessed by the investigator during slit lamp examination and graded on a 5-point scale, with 0 = ≤ 1 cell count; 1 = 2 to 10 cell count; 2 = 11 to 20 cell count; 3 = 21 to 50 cell count; and 4 = > 50 cell count. (NCT01201798)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Day 3, Day 7, Day 21, Day 28, Day 35, Day 42
,
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline (Day 0) | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 |
---|
Durezol | 2.6 | -1.1 | -1.8 | -2.4 | -2.3 | -2.3 | -2.3 |
Pred Forte | 2.6 | -1.0 | -1.6 | -2.1 | -2.1 | -2.1 | -2.1 |
[back to top]
Severity of AEs and SAEs
AEs and SAEs were categorized as mild, moderate or severe according to the following criteria: Mild=barely noticeable to participant or does not make participant uncomfortable; does not influence performance or functioning; prescription drug not ordinarily needed for relief of symptom(s) but may be given because of personality of participant. Moderate=of a sufficient severity to make participant uncomfortable; performance of daily activity is influenced; participant is able to continue in study; treatment for symptom(s) may be needed. Severe=symptoms cause severe discomfort; symptoms cause incapacity or significant impact on participant's daily life; severity may cause cessation of treatment with study treatment; treatment for symptom(s) may be given and/or participant hospitalized. Please see Outcome Measure 3 for AE and SAE definitions. (NCT01211665)
Timeframe: from the first dose of study treatment through the end of the treatment period (6 months) + a 4-week post-treatment period
,
Intervention | events (Number) |
---|
| Mild SAE | Moderate SAE | Severe SAE | Mild AE | Moderate AE | Severe AE |
---|
IVMP With Oral Prednisolone Taper | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Pulsed IVMP | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Who Survived at 6 Months Following Completion of Plasma Exchange (PLEX)
Following the completion of rapid removal of natalizumab using PLEX or equivalent. (NCT01211665)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Pulsed IVMP | 1 |
IVMP With Oral Prednisolone Taper | 1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AE=any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; in the view of the Investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death (a life-threatening event); however, this does not include an event that, had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An SAE may also be any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above. (NCT01211665)
Timeframe: from the first dose of study treatment through the end of the treatment period (6 months) + a 4-week post-treatment period
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| AEs | SAEs |
---|
IVMP With Oral Prednisolone Taper | 1 | 1 |
Pulsed IVMP | 2 | 2 |
[back to top]
DAS28-ESR During the Noninterventional Phase
DAS28-ESR was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and ESR (millimeters per hour [mm/hr]). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-ESR ≤3.2=LDA and >3.2 to 5.1=moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-ESR <2.6=remission. Timepoint was V2, or before V2 for participants withdrawn before V2; DAS28-ESR values indicated in the CRF were recalculated by the data manager. The recalculated values were used in the statistical analyses. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| V1 (n=62) | V2 (n=52) | Change from V1 to V2 (n=50) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 5.8 | 3.3 | -2.7 |
[back to top]
HAQ-DI During the Interventional Phase
HAQ-DI is a self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ-DI score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation. V3, CV, and the change from V3 to CV was determined. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: Visit 3 (7 months) and CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| V3 (n=41) | CV (n=28) | Change from V3 to CV (n=26) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
[back to top]
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) During the Noninterventional Phase
HAQ-DI is a self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ-DI score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation. Timepoint was V2, or before V2 for participants withdrawn before V2. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| V1 (n=66) | V2 (n=61) | Change from V1 to V2 (n=60) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 1.7 | 1.2 | -0.5 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Number of Erosions During the NonInterventional Phase
In RA, the presence, number, and size of bone erosions and the number of joints with erosions on CRs are hallmarks for diagnosis, staging and prediction of damage progression and are used for treatment monitoring in randomized controlled studies. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | erosions (Mean) |
---|
| V1 (n=11) | Between V1 and V2 (n=6) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 5.1 | 3.2 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Positive for Anti-cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (Anti-CCP) Antibody During the Noninterventional Phase
Anti-CCP antibodies are important markers of bone erosion in RA. Anti-CCP antibodies were classified as positive if >7 U/mL. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| V1 (n=20) | Between V1 and V2 (n=6) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 75.0 | 83.3 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Positive for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) During the Noninterventional Phase
RF is the auto antibody directed against immunoglobulin G (IgG) and its concentration is observed in human serum or plasma. RF value higher than 20 units per milliliter (U/mL) is considered positive. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| V1 (n=39) | Between V1 and V2 (n=21) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 56.4 | 52.4 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Erosions During the NonInterventional Phase
In RA, the presence, number and size of bone erosions and the number of joints with erosions on conventional radiographs (CRs) are hallmarks for diagnosis, staging and prediction of damage progression and are used for treatment monitoring in randomized controlled studies. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| V1 (n=57) | Between V1 and V2 (n=36) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 47.4 | 41.7 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With LDA or Remission During the Interventional Phase Assessed Using CDAI
The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-100 mm VAS; higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity. CDAI total score=0-76. CDAI ≤2.8=disease remission and >2.8 to 10=LDA. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: Visits 3 (7 months), 4 (8 months), 5 (9 months), 6 (10 months), 7 (11 months), 8 (12 months), and 9 (24 weeks after V3) or CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| V3 LDA (n=40) | V3 Remission (n=40) | V4 LDA (n=41) | V4 Remission (n=41) | V5 LDA (n=38) | V5 Remission (n=38) | V6 LDA (n=35) | V6 Remission (n=35) | V7 LDA (n=33) | V7 Remission (n=33) | V8 LDA (n=31) | V8 Remission (n=31) | V9 LDA (n=29) | V9 Remission (n=29) | CV LDA (n=27) | CV Remission (n=27) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 85.0 | 27.5 | 82.9 | 39.0 | 81.6 | 47.4 | 71.4 | 37.1 | 75.8 | 33.3 | 80.6 | 38.7 | 69.0 | 31.0 | 77.8 | 33.3 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With LDA or Remission During the Interventional Phase Assessed Using DAS28-CRP
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC) using the 28 joint count, the CRP and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 and oral GC intake with MP equivalent dose of ≥1 mg and ≤20 mg/day=LDA; DAS28 <2.6 = remission. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: Visits 3 (7 months), 4 (8 months), 5 (9 months), 6 (10 months), 7 (11 months), 8 (12 months), 9 (24 weeks after V3) or CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| V3 LDA (n=42) | V3 Remission (n=42) | V4 LDA (n=41) | V4 Remission (n=41) | V5 LDA (n=35) | V5 Remission (n=35) | V6 LDA (n=35) | V6 Remission (n=35) | V7 LDA (n=33) | V7 Remission (n=33) | V8 LDA (n=32) | V8 Remission (n=32) | V9 LDA (n=30) | V9 Remission (n=30) | CV LDA (n=27) | CV Remission (n=27) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 90.5 | 73.8 | 85.4 | 73.2 | 88.6 | 71.4 | 82.9 | 62.9 | 90.9 | 57.6 | 87.5 | 62.5 | 73.3 | 56.7 | 88.9 | 59.3 |
[back to top]
SF-36 Subscale Scores During the Interventional Phase
"SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects can also be summarized as physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS). Total of 11 variables were analyzed (8 subscales, 2 composite subscales and Question 2 how would you rate your health in general now? (range 1= better, 5= worst). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Higher scores reflect higher quality of life. V3, CV, and the change from V3 to CV was determined." (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V3 (7 months) and CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Physical functioning V3 (n=36) | Physical functioning CV (n=26) | Change in physical functioning V3 to CV (n=22) | Physical sub-score V3 (n=37) | Physical sub-score CV (n=26) | Change in physical sub-score V3 to CV (n=22) | Bodily pain V3 (n=37) | Bodily pain CV (n=26) | Change in bodily pain V3 to CV (n=22) | General health V3 (n=37) | General health CV (n=26) | Change in general health V3 to CV (n=22) | Vitality V3 (n=37) | Vitality CV (n=26) | Change in vitality V3 to CV (n=22) | Social functioning V3 (n=37) | Social functioning CV (n=26) | Change in social functioning V3 to CV (n=22) | Emotional sub-score V3 (n=37) | Emotional sub-score CV (n=26) | Change in emotional sub-score V3 to CV (n=22) | Mental health V3 (n=37) | Mental health CV (n=26) | Change in Mental health V3 to CV (n=22) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 41.52 | 41.92 | -1.80 | 40.61 | 39.85 | -2.79 | 45.88 | 44.65 | -3.21 | 43.11 | 40.82 | -3.78 | 50.51 | 48.91 | -4.37 | 45.42 | 45.58 | -2.73 | 40.59 | 40.37 | -2.45 | 47.14 | 45.94 | -5.47 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
SJC and TJC During the Interventional Phase
TJC and SJC were assessed for 28 joints. An assessment of 28 joints for swelling and tenderness was made. Joints were assessed and classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) and tender (1)/not tender (0) by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination for a total score range of 0-28. Higher scores indicated greater disease activity (tenderness/swelling). V3, CV, and the change from V3 to CV was determined. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V3 (7 months) and CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | joints (Mean) |
---|
| SJC V3 (n=43) | SJC CV (n=29) | SJC Change from V3 to CV (n=29) | TJC V3 (n=43) | TJC CV (n=29) | TJC Change from V3 to CV (n=29) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 0.9 | 0.4 | -0.3 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.0 |
[back to top]
Type of GC Taken at the End of the Noninterventional Phase
During the noninterventional phase of the study participants received GC as prescribed by the physician. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| MP | Prednisolone | Prednisone |
---|
Tocilizumab | 70.0 | 28.0 | 2.0 |
[back to top]
VAS for Pain (VAS-Pain) During the Interventional Phase
Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to the intensity of their pain on a 100-mm VAS, where 0=no pain and 100=worst possible pain. The distance from the left edge was measured. Change = V3 mean minus CV mean. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V3 (7 months) and CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | mm (Mean) |
---|
| V3 (n=43) | CV (n=28) | Change from V3 to CV (n=28) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 19.9 | 24.9 | 6.9 |
[back to top]
VAS-Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (GDA) During the Interventional Phase
Physician's were asked to determine the overall GDA for each participant using a 100-mm VAS, where 0=no disease activity and 100=maximum disease activity. The physician marked the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. V3, CV, and the change from V3 to CV was determined. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V3 (7 months) and CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | mm (Mean) |
---|
| V3 (n=40) | CV (n=28) | Change from V3 to CV (n=26) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 16.6 | 16.7 | 3.1 |
[back to top]
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score During the Interventional Phase
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). V3, CV, and the change from V3 to CV was determined. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V3 (7 months) and CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| V3 (n=37) | CV (n=26) | Change from V3 to CV (n=22) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 37.5 | 35.6 | 8.8 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Changes in Tocilizumab Dose During the Noninterventional Phase
The dose of tocilizumab could have been reduced from the recommended 8 mg/kg to 4 mg/kg in participants in the case of adverse events. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With GC Switches During the Noninterventional Phase
During the noninterventional phase of the study, once LDA was achieved, GC was switched to MP tablets. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Able to Acheive LDA Assessed Using DAS28 While Receiving Oral GC on Background Tocilizumab Treatment During the Noninterventional Phase
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the CRP and Patient's Global Assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 ≤3.2 and oral GC intake with MP equivalent dose of ≥1 mg and ≤20 mg/day= LDA. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 72.1 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Able to Discontinue GCs During the Interventional Phase by V9
(NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V9 (24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 3.3 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Able to Reduce Oral GCs by ≥50 Percent (%) During the Interventional Phase by V9
(NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V9 (24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 93.3 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Able to Start the GC Reduction Phase at V3
All participants who maintained LDA (defined as DAS28-CRP ≤3.2) from V2 to V3 were included in the interventional phase for reduction of GC. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V3 (7 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 87.8 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Acheiving Remission Assessed Using DAS28 While Receiving Oral GC on Background TocilizumabTreatment During the Noninterventional Phase
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the CRP and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 <2.6 = remission. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 41.2 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants in the Interventional Phase Who Achieved LDA and Discontinued Oral GC Within 20 Weeks
The percentage of participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with LDA was defined as DAS28 ≤3.2, able to discontinue oral GC within 20 weeks and at the latest at V8, confirmed at the Consolidation Visit without loss of clinical response defined as DAS28 (CRP) >3.2. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: Visits 3 (7 months), 4 (8 months), 5 (9 months), 6 (10 months), 7 (11 months), and 8 (12 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 58.1 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Changes in RA Treatment During the Noninterventional Phase
(NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 15.2 |
[back to top]
Time-Averaged GC Dose Changes During the Interventional Phase
"Area Under the Curve (AUC) of GC dose during the interventional phase was determined using the trapezoidal method and was calculated as:~AUC = sigma(Ti+1 - Ti) x [(Di+1+Di)/2]~With Di=dosage at time Ti~It corresponds to the total GC dose received between Baseline (visit 3) and visit 9 and has been calculated only for the 30 patients achieving visit 9." (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V3 (7 months) and CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | mg (Mean) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 341.8 |
[back to top]
CDAI Score During the Interventional Phase
The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-100 mm VAS; higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity. CDAI total score=0-76. CDAI ≤2.8=disease remission, >2.8 to 10=LDA, >10 to 22=moderate disease activity, and >22=high disease activity. V3, CV, and the change from V3 to CV was determined. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V3 (7 months) and CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| V3 (n=40) | CV (n=27) | Change from V3 to CV (n=25) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 5.6 | 6.5 | 1.4 |
[back to top]
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) During the Noninterventional Phase
The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of disease assessed on 0-100 mm Visual analog scale (VAS); higher scores=greater affection due to disease activity. CDAI total score=0-76. CDAI ≤2.8=disease remission, >2.8 to 10=LDA, >10 to 22=moderate disease activity, and >22=high disease activity. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| V1 (n=62) | V2 (n=52) | Change from V1 to V2 (n=50) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 33.8 | 14.6 | -20.4 |
[back to top]
DAS28-CRP During the Interventional Phase
DAS28-CRP was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28-joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP) ≤3.2=LDA and >3.2 to 5.1=moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission. DAS28-CRP values indicated in the CRF were recalculated by the data manager. The cumulative DAS28 (CRP) value (AUC method) was performed using the calculated DAS28. The recalculated values were used in the statistical analyses. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V3 (7 months) and CV (4 weeks after GC-free status, maximum of 24 weeks after V3)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| V3 (n=42) | CV (n=27) | Change from V3 to CV (n=27) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.2 |
[back to top]
DAS28-CRP During the Noninterventional Phase
DAS28-CRP was calculated from the swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using the 28-joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-CRP ≤3.2=LDA and >3.2 to 5.1=moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-CRP <2.6=remission. Timepoint was V2, or before V2 for participants withdrawn before V2; DAS28-CRP values indicated in the Case Report Form (CRF) were recalculated by the data manager. The recalculated values were used in the statistical analyses. (NCT01219933)
Timeframe: V1 and V2 (up to 6 months after V1)
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| V1 (n=67) | V2 (n=66) | Change from V1 to V2 (n=65) |
---|
Tocilizumab | 5.4 | 2.9 | -2.5 |
[back to top]
Pain Numeric Rating Scale
Leg Pain NRS is a second primary outcome at 6 weeks We measured leg pain using a 0-10 pain NRS (0=no pain and 10=worst pain imaginable) assessing average pain over the past week. (NCT01238536)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Epidural Steroid Injection | 4.4 |
Epidural Local Anesthetic Injection | 4.6 |
[back to top]
Leg Pain NRS
Leg Pain NRS 0-10 scale (NCT01238536)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Epidural Steroid Injection | 4.7 |
Epidural Local Anesthetic Injection | 4.3 |
[back to top]
Roland Morris
The primary outcome measure will be back specific functional status, measured by the Roland Scale at 6 weeks. The RDQ is a back pain specific functional status questionnaire adapted from the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). The RDQ consists of 24 yes/no items, which represent common dysfunctions in daily activities experienced by subjects with low back pain. A single unweighted score is derived by summing the 24 items, with higher scores indicating worse function with 0 (no disability) to 24 (maximum disability). Our primary analysis will be a simple 2-group comparison of the mean Roland score as an evaluation of the short-term efficacy of epidural steroid injection. (NCT01238536)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Epidural Steroid Injection | 11.8 |
Epidural Local Anesthetic Injection | 12.5 |
[back to top]
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)
The RDQ is a back pain specific functional status questionnaire adapted from the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). The RDQ consists of 24 yes/no items, which represent common dysfunctions in daily activities experienced by subjects with low back pain. A single unweighted score is derived by summing the 24 items, with higher scores indicating worse function with 0 (no disability) to 24 (maximum disability). Our primary analysis will be a simple 2-group comparison of the mean Roland score as an evaluation of the short-term efficacy of epidural steroid injection. (NCT01238536)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Epidural Steroid Injection | 12.0 |
Epidural Local Anesthetic Injection | 11.5 |
[back to top]
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
(NCT01267201)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 16 and 24 hrs post-dose
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Tablet | 289.00 |
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Micronized API | 279.10 |
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Sieve Cut API | 246.20 |
[back to top]
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)]
AUC (0 - ∞) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). (NCT01267201)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 16 and 24 hours (hrs) post-dose
Intervention | ng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Tablet | 1286.00 |
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Micronized API | 1204.00 |
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Sieve Cut API | 1180.00 |
[back to top]
Plasma Decay Half-life (t1/2)
Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. (NCT01267201)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 16 and 24 hrs post-dose
Intervention | hr (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Tablet | 2.43 |
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Micronized API | 2.42 |
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Sieve Cut API | 2.45 |
[back to top]
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax)
(NCT01267201)
Timeframe: 0 (pre-dose), 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 16 and 24 hrs post-dose
Intervention | hr (Median) |
---|
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Tablet | 2.00 |
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Micronized API | 1.00 |
Methylprednisolone 32 mg Sieve Cut API | 2.00 |
[back to top]
Urgent Care Visits, ED Visits and Hospitalizations
Number of participants who had urgent care visits, ED visits, and/or hospitalizations for respiratory symptoms. (NCT01272635)
Timeframe: 14 days after initiation of therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Azythromycin | 20 |
Placebo | 38 |
[back to top]
Progression to Clinically Significant Lower Respiratory Tract Symptoms
Progression to clinically significant lower respiratory tract symptoms defined by: (1) having symptoms that were more than mild after 3 albuterol administrations over 1 hour, or (2) requiring albuterol administrations more often than once every 4 hours, or (3) requiring more than 6 albuterol treatments over a 24-hour period, or (4) having moderate to severe cough or wheeze for 5 or more days since study medication was initiated. (NCT01272635)
Timeframe: 14 days after initiation of APRIL therapy
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Azythromycin | 35 |
Placebo | 57 |
[back to top]
OCELOT: Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure
The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) is a composite outcome with scores ranging from 0-12 with higher numbers representing worse symptoms. The score is calculated as the sum total of the follow five elements: (1) scalene retractions, (2) suprasternal retractions, (3) wheezing, (4) air entry, (5) oxygen saturation. A complete description can be found in: Ducharme FM, Chalut D, Plotnick L, et al. The Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure: a valid clinical score for assessing acute asthma severity from toddlers to teenagers. J Pediatr 2008;152:476-80. (NCT01272635)
Timeframe: 36-72 hours after initiation of OCELOT therapy
Intervention | PRAM score (Mean) |
---|
Prednisone | 0.82 |
Placebo | 1.00 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
60-day Mortality
The primary outcome is all-cause mortality at 60 days, defined by whether the patient has died by the end of study day 60. (NCT01283009)
Timeframe: 60-day
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Died on or prior to study day 6072325123 | Died on or prior to study day 6072325124 | On Mechanical Ventilation at Study Entry72325123 | On Mechanical Ventilation at Study Entry72325124 | Not on Mechanical Ventilation72325123 | Not on Mechanical Ventilation72325124 |
---|
| Yes | No | Unknown |
---|
Arm 1: Inactive Substance | 50 |
Arm 2: Methylprednisolone | 47 |
Arm 1: Inactive Substance | 227 |
Arm 2: Methylprednisolone | 239 |
Arm 1: Inactive Substance | 10 |
Arm 2: Methylprednisolone | 11 |
Arm 1: Inactive Substance | 24 |
Arm 2: Methylprednisolone | 22 |
Arm 1: Inactive Substance | 70 |
Arm 2: Methylprednisolone | 72 |
Arm 1: Inactive Substance | 2 |
Arm 2: Methylprednisolone | 3 |
Arm 1: Inactive Substance | 26 |
Arm 2: Methylprednisolone | 25 |
Arm 1: Inactive Substance | 157 |
Arm 2: Methylprednisolone | 167 |
Arm 1: Inactive Substance | 8 |
Arm 2: Methylprednisolone | 8 |
[back to top]
Complete Response Duration
The complete remission (CR) is the total number of patients who are in CR at one year divided by the total number of patients who received at least one dose of HCVAD with liposomal vincristine. CR was defined as the presence of 1x10^9/L neutrophils, >100x10^9/L platelets in the perpherial blood, and no extramedullary disease. Response date to loss of response or last follow up. Remission duration will be measured by the estimated median remission duration computed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis, which is the time point at which the cumulative remission duration drops below 50%, if present. If not present then median remission duration is not reached and not available (NA) as there are an insufficient number of participants with events. In either case ranges are provided for observed survival intervals used in the K-M analysis.. (NCT01319981)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years, 8 months
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|
Hyper-CMAD + Rituximab | NA |
Hyper-CMAD | NA |
[back to top]
Number of Patients With Complete Remission at One Year
The complete remission (CR) is the total number of patients who are in CR at one year divided by the total number of patients who received at least one dose of HCVAD with liposomal vincristine. CR was defined as the presence of 1x10^9/L neutrophils, >100x10^9/L platelets in the perpherial blood, and no extramedullary disease. (NCT01319981)
Timeframe: 1 year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Hyper-CMAD + Rituximab | 12 |
Hyper-CMAD | 13 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival
Time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up. Survival will be measured by the estimated median survival computed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis, which is the time point at which the cumulative survival drops below 50%, if present. If not present then the median Overall Survival is not reached and not available (NA) as there are an insufficient number of participants with events. In either case ranges are provided for observed survival intervals used in the K-M analysis. (NCT01319981)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years, 8 months
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|
Hyper-CMAD + Rituximab | NA |
Hyper-CMAD | NA |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at 12 Weeks
"The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) from baseline to Week 12.~The DAS28-CRP is a composite measure of inflammation in Rheumatoid Arthritis and incorporates a tender and swollen joint count, CRP and Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity expressed in a Gaussian distribution of variables ranging from 0 to 10. A DAS28-CRP score of <3.2 suggests a low level of disease activity, while a score of >5.1 suggests a high level of disease activity. Using the DAS-CRP as a continuous scale allows investigators (and clinicians) to measure a clinically meaningful endpoint following institution of a therapeutic intervention. In RA, clinical remission would therefore be graded as a DAS28 score of ≤3.2 with disease flare accompanying scores of ≥5.1; well-controlled disease is best characterized as fitting in between these two scores." (NCT01369745)
Timeframe: baseline to week 12
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Prednisolone | -1.147 |
Dipyridamole | -0.813 |
Prednisone | -1.237 |
Z102 | -0.907 |
Placebo | -0.538 |
[back to top]
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to first occurrence of disease progression (either radiographic or clinical), or death from any cause. PFS was determined using radiographic progression defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) on measurable lesions captured by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical disease progression was considered only when disease progression could not be confirmed by CT or MRI, such as when the disease site is skin, bone marrow, or central nervous system. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|
Exemestane | 3.68 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone | 3.65 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone | 4.47 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 3 years
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|
Exemestane | NA |
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone | 26.41 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone | NA |
[back to top]
Duration of Response
Duration of objective response was measured from the first time that the CR or PR was achieved to the first observation of disease progression (either radiographic or clinical) based on the RECIST criteria. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|
Exemestane | 6.47 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone | 4.86 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone | 6.93 |
[back to top]
Clinical Benefit Rate
Clinical benefit rate was defined as the percentage of participants with measurable disease achieving a best overall response of a CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months based on RECIST. Stable disease: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study and persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) and/or maintenance of tumour marker level above the normal limits. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Exemestane | 12.7 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone | 9.6 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone | 22.7 |
[back to top]
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with measurable disease achieving a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions. PR: at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Approximately 2 years
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Exemestane | 6.3 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone | 5.8 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone | 12.1 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline in Serum Endocrine Biomarkers (Estradiol and Estrone) at End of Treatment
Change from baseline in serum endocrine biomarkers (estradiol and estrone) was summarized by treatment at end of treatment. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of treatment (approximately 2 years)
,,
Intervention | Picomoles Per Liter (Pmol/L) (Mean) |
---|
| Estradiol | Estrone |
---|
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone | -1.04 | -30.60 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone | -3.35 | -28.09 |
Exemestane | 1.53 | -34.20 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline in Serum Endocrine Biomarkers (Progesterone and Testosterone) at End of Treatment
Change from baseline in serum endocrine biomarkers (Progesterone and Testosterone) was summarized by treatment at end of treatment. (NCT01381874)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of treatment (approximately 2 years)
,,
Intervention | Nanomoles Per Liter (nmol/L) (Mean) |
---|
| Progesterone | Testosterone |
---|
Abiraterone Acetate + Exemestane + Prednisone | 12.34 | -0.48 |
Abiraterone Acetate + Prednisone | 8.98 | -0.51 |
Exemestane | -4.80 | -0.09 |
[back to top]
Number of Eyes With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Elevation
Absolute IOP greater than or equal to 24 mm Hg or a relative increase of 10 mm Hg over the baseline preoperative reading. (NCT01448213)
Timeframe: one day, two days, one week, one month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after DMEK
Intervention | eyes (Number) |
---|
Fluorometholone 0.1% Solution | 9 |
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Solution | 32 |
[back to top]
Number of Eyes With Immunologic Graft Rejection Episodes
(NCT01448213)
Timeframe: Within 1 year
Intervention | eyes (Number) |
---|
Fluorometholone 0.1% Solution | 2 |
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Solution | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Overall CR
CR overall (induction and maintenance treatment) was based on International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IW-CLL) criteria (Hallek, et al 2008). There are numerous diagnostic tests used for response evaluation including potentially CBC and differential count, marrow aspirate and biopsy, ultrasound of the abdomen, CT scans (chest, pelvis, abdomen) and physical examination. CR is absence of significant lymphadenopathy (nodes<1.5 centimeters in long axis diameter), hepatomegaly, splenomegaly as well as blood lymphocytes<4000/microliter, normocellular for age marrow with <30% lymphocytes, no B-lymphoid nodules and platelet>100,000/micro liter, hemoglobin>11 grams/deciliter, neutrophils>1500/microliter. (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated after weeks 8 and 16 of Part A, at 12, 18 and 24 weeks during part B and every 6 months on Part C.
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 2 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 0 |
[back to top]
Transplant Rate
Percentage of participants eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) that are able and willing to proceed to alloHSCT. (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: Evaluated up to 36 cycles (approximately 2.75 years) of treatment (Parts A, B and C)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 43 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 43 |
[back to top]
Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Overall ORR is the percentage of participants achieving a minimum of partial response (PR) over induction and maintenance treatment based on International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IW-CLL) criteria (Hallek, et al 2008). There are numerous diagnostic tests used for response evaluation including potentially CBC and differential count, marrow aspirate and biopsy, ultrasound of the abdomen, CT scans (chest, pelvis, abdomen) and physical examination. PR is a 50% or greater decrease of measured size of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly as well as blood lymphocytes (over baseline), marrow infiltrate or B-lymphoid nodules and a 50% or greater increase from baseline in platelet count (or level >100,000/micro liter), hemoglobin (or level >11 grams/deciliter), neutrophils (or level >1500/microliter). (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated after weeks 8 and 16 of Part A, at 12, 18 and 24 weeks during part B and every 6 months on Part C.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 80 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 67 |
[back to top]
3-year Overall Survival (OS) Probability
3-year OS is the probability of participants remaining alive at 3 years from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: Median survival follow-up was 45 months (range 31-58 months) in this study cohort.
Intervention | percentage probability (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 66 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 53 |
[back to top]
3-Year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Probability
3-year PFS is the probability of participants remaining alive and progression-free at 3 years from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Disease progression (PD) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IW-CLL) criteria (Hallek, et al 2008) is: the appearance of any new lesion (enlarged lymph node minimum >1.5 centimeters); an increase by 50% in greatest determined diameter of any previous site; an increase in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen by 50% or more or the de novo appearance of hepatomegaly, splenomegaly; a 50% increase of blood lymphocytes (over baseline with level at least 5,000/microliter); occurrence of cytopenia secondary to CLL at least 3 months post treatment including a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in platelet count (or level <100,000/microliter) or a hemoglobin decrease of >2 grams/deciliter (or level <10 grams/deciliter); and transformation to a more aggressive histology. (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated on treatment after weeks 8 and 16 of Part A, at 12, 18 and 24 weeks during part B and every 6 months on Part C as well as off-treatment every 3 months up to 5 years.
Intervention | percentage probability (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 53 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 25 |
[back to top]
Induction Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Induction ORR is the percentage of participants achieving a minimum of partial response (PR) over induction treatment based on International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IW-CLL) criteria (Hallek, et al 2008). There are numerous diagnostic tests used for response evaluation including potentially CBC and differential count, marrow aspirate and biopsy, ultrasound of the abdomen, CT scans (chest, pelvis, abdomen) and physical examination. PR is a 50% or greater decrease of measured size of lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly as well as blood lymphocytes (over baseline), marrow infiltrate or B-lymphoid nodules and a 50% or greater increase from baseline in platelet count (or level >100,000/micro liter), hemoglobin (or level >11 grams/deciliter), neutrophils (or level >1500/microliter). (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated after weeks 8 and 16 of Part A and at 12, 18 and 24 weeks during part B.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 73 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 60 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Achieving Induction Complete Response (CR)
CR over induction treatment was based on International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IW-CLL) criteria (Hallek, et al 2008). There are numerous diagnostic tests used for response evaluation including potentially CBC and differential count, marrow aspirate and biopsy, ultrasound of the abdomen, CT scans (chest, pelvis, abdomen) and physical examination. CR is absence of significant lymphadenopathy (nodes<1.5 centimeters in long axis diameter), hepatomegaly, splenomegaly as well as blood lymphocytes<4000/microliter, normocellular for age marrow with <30% lymphocytes, no B-lymphoid nodules and platelet>100,000/micro liter, hemoglobin>11 grams/deciliter, neutrophils>1500/microliter. (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: Disease was evaluated after weeks 8 and 16 of Part A and at 12, 18 and 24 weeks during part B.
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 0 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 0 |
[back to top]
Overall MRD Negative Rate
Overall MRD negative rate is the percentage of participants classified as MRD negative by four color flow cytometry. The assay has a sensitivity of 1 in 10,000 leukocytes. (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: MRD was assessed after weeks 8 and 16 of Part A, at 12, 18 and 24 weeks during part B and every 6 months on Part C.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 80 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 53 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Completing Only 2 Cycles of Part A Treatment
Participants counted if only completed 2 cycles of Part A treatment per protocol. (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: Evaluated after 2 cycles/8 weeks of Part A therapy.
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 0 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Completing Part A Treatment
Participants counted as completing Part A with either 2 or 4 cycles of treatment per protocol. (NCT01465334)
Timeframe: Evaluated up to 4 cycles/16 weeks.
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Treatment Naive | 12 |
Relapsed/Refractory | 15 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Anterior Chamber Cells & Flare
"Anterior Chamber Flare (for those subjects that could be examined with a slit lamp):~Assessed scattering of a slit lamp light beam when directed into the anterior chamber (Tyndall effect). 0 = None No Tyndall effect~= Mild Tyndall effect barely discernible~= Moderate Tyndall effect in anterior chamber is moderately intense. Iris pattern is seen clearly~= Severe Tyndall effect in anterior chamber is severely intense. Iris pattern cannot be seen clearly~= Very severe Tyndall effect is very severely intense. The aqueous has a white and milky appearance" (NCT01475643)
Timeframe: Over all visits 42 days
Intervention | Grade of anterior chamber flare (Mean) |
---|
Loteprednol Etabonate | .192 |
Prednisolones Acetate | .341 |
[back to top]
Anterior Chamber Inflammation
"Anterior Chamber Inflammation (for subjects that could only be examined with a pen light and a 20D [g20 Diopter] magnifying lens): 0 = None Clear anterior chamber with no visible clouding (Tyndall effect and cells combined). Red reflex normal~= Mild Mild anterior chamber clouding. Clear iris pattern on visualization. Red reflex normal~= Moderate Moderate anterior chamber clouding~= Severe Severe anterior chamber clouding. Iris pattern not clearly visualized. Red reflex diminished~= Very severe Severe anterior chamber clouding with a white and/or milky appearance of the anterior chamber. Red reflex absent or severely diminished" (NCT01475643)
Timeframe: Postoperative Day 29
Intervention | grade of anterior chamber cells (Mean) |
---|
Loteprednol Etabonate | .913 |
Prednisolones Acetate | .783 |
[back to top]
Rate of Progression/Relapse Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from study entry to disease progression, relapse or death due to any cause, whichever is earlier. (NCT01496976)
Timeframe: Up to 56 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|
Immunotherapy | 54.4 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Partial Response (PR)
The primary endpoint for this trial is the combined complete and partial response rate to the protocol therapy at 3 months, which is also the end of Cycle 3. The objective response (CR+PR) rate will be summarized using both a point estimate and its exact confidence interval based on the binomial distribution. (NCT01496976)
Timeframe: 3 Months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Immunotherapy | 33 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival will be summarized with the Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT01496976)
Timeframe: 36 Months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Immunotherapy | 24 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Complete Response (CR)
Number of participants with complete response, the disappearance of all signs of cancer in response to treatment. (NCT01496976)
Timeframe: 3 Months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Immunotherapy | 1 |
[back to top]
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR at 3 months. Assessment for response will be made following the National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCIWG) 2008 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) criteria for response. Objective response = Complete Response (disappearance of all target lesions) + Partial Response (>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) (NCT01497496)
Timeframe: 3 Months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Immunotherapy | 48.3 |
[back to top]
Conjunctival Redness Change From Baseline to Day 11
Conjunctival Redness, as measured by the investigator, on a 4-point scale 7 minutes after the CAC. 0 was best (no redness), and 4 was worst (most redness) (NCT01534195)
Timeframe: 7 Minutes post-CAC
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Prednisolone | -0.69 |
Placebo | 0.40 |
[back to top]
Ocular Itching Change From Baseline to Day 11
Ocular itching, as assessed by the participant, was measured on a 4-point scale 5 minutes after the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC). 0 was best (no itching), and 4 was worst (worst itching). (NCT01534195)
Timeframe: 5 minutes post-CAC
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Prednisolone | -1.1 |
Placebo | -0.45 |
[back to top]
Episcleral Redness Change From Baseline to Day 6
Episcleral redness, as measured by the investigator, on a 4-point scale 7 minutes after the CAC.0 was best (least redness), and 4 was worst (most redness). (NCT01534195)
Timeframe: 7 minutes post-CAC
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Prednisolone | -1.0 |
Placebo | 0.45 |
[back to top]
Ciliary Redness Change From Baseline to Day 6
Ciliary redness, as measured by the investigator, on a 4-point scale 7 minutes after the CAC. 0 was best (least redness), and 4 was worst (most redness). (NCT01534195)
Timeframe: 7 minutes post-CAC
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Prednisolone | -0.94 |
Placebo | 0.30 |
[back to top]
Orthostatic Hypotension
(NCT01559675)
Timeframe: Postoperative Day 1
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
High Dose Steroid | 2 |
Low Dose Steroid | 2 |
[back to top]
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Post Cardiac Surgery.
Amount of time on mechanical ventilation following cardiac surgery (NCT01579513)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|
Intraoperative Methylprednisone | 4 |
Placebo | 5 |
[back to top]
Intensive Care Unit Stay
Amount of time in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery (NCT01579513)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks
Intervention | Days (Mean) |
---|
Intraoperative Methylprednisone | 11 |
Placebo | 11 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With a Clinically Derived Composite Morbidity-mortality Outcome
The composite morbidity-mortality outcome will be met if any of the following occur after surgery but before hospital discharge: death, cardiac arrest, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, renal insufficiency (creatinine more than two times normal), hepatic insufficiency (aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase more than two times normal), or rising lactic acidosis (>5mmol/L). This outcome was choosen because death rarely occurs in this population. We have found this endpoint to be highly associated with other important clinical outcomes in this population. (NCT01579513)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Intraoperative Methylprednisone | 27 |
Placebo | 40 |
[back to top]
Neurodevelopmental Outcome
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development version 3 at 1 year. Cognitive, language, and motor composite scores will be used. The general population has a mean of 100 with a standard deviation of 15 for each composite score. Higher scores are better. The minimum composite score is 46 and maximum 154. (NCT01579513)
Timeframe: 1 year
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Cognitive Domain | Language Domain | Motor Domain |
---|
Intraoperative Methylprednisone | 105 | 101 | 90 |
Placebo | 104 | 100 | 91 |
[back to top]
Hospital Stay
Total duration of hospital stay following cardiac surgery (NCT01579513)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks
Intervention | Days (Mean) |
---|
Intraoperative Methylprednisone | 20 |
Placebo | 22 |
[back to top]
Reduction of Pain Severity Expressed as Percentage Change in VAS Score
"VAS score~VAS score is a 10 -cm graduated scale with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) self- reported by patients~Reference: Langley GB and Sheppeard H. The visual analogue scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheumatol Int 1985;5(4):145-148." (NCT01652495)
Timeframe: 180 days after treatment
Intervention | percentage of pain reduction (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Acetate Group | 82 |
Triamcinolone Acetonide Group | 96 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Patients With Suppression of Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal Axis
"Evaluation of blood cortisol and ACTH, free urinary cortisol, urinary levels of methylprednisolone or triamcinolone (depending on the administered drug) by RIA immunoassay and tandem mass assays~Persistent suppression of the HPA axis at the end of the follow up is based on the evidence of ACTH, plasmatic and urinary cortisol levels under reference values" (NCT01652495)
Timeframe: 45 days after treatment
Intervention | % of patients with HPA suppression (Number) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Acetate Group | 0 |
Triamcinolone Acetonide Group | 15 |
[back to top]
Functional Improvement Measured According to Percentage Change in Constant Score
"Patients will be evaluated clinically by Constant Score~Constant score: range 0 (total shoulder impairment) to 100 (non impaired shoulder). The score is obtained from two subjective (pain and relation between pain and daily-life activities) - and two objective physician-assessed (strength and range of motion) measurements~Reference: Constant CR and Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4." (NCT01652495)
Timeframe: 180 days after treatment
Intervention | percentage of improvement Constant score (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Acetate Group | 99 |
Triamcinolone Acetonide Group | 95 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) Antibodies Over Time
(NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Pre-dose Cycle 1 to 8, interim staging, final staging, 6, 12 months follow-up, end of study (Up to 4 years)
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Cycle 1 | Cycle 2 | Cycle 3 | Cycle 4 | Interim staging | Cycle 5 | Cycle 6 | Cycle 7 | Cycle 8 | Final staging | Follow-up, 6 months | Follow-up, 12 months | End of study/early treatment termination |
---|
Arm A | 11.4 | 7.0 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 12.5 | 16.0 | 23.8 | 13.3 | 10.0 | 6.5 | 7.7 | 3.5 |
Arm B | 15.6 | 18.2 | 23.5 | 14.7 | 9.7 | 10.2 | 11.6 | 10.9 | 11.0 | 12.6 | 13.4 | 8.7 | 6.3 |
[back to top]
Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ) Score
CTSQ is a validated 16-item questionnaire that measures three domains related to participants' satisfaction with cancer therapy. These include expectations of therapy, feelings about side effects, and satisfaction with therapy. Each domain is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of more positive feelings toward therapy. The score for each domain was averaged among all participants. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: During Cycle 4, 8 of treatment (Up to 32 weeks)
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Expectations of therapy domain | Feelings about side effects domain | Satisfaction with therapy domain |
---|
Rituximab Intravenous (IV) | 80.88 | 60.63 | 84.59 |
Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) | 82.07 | 61.64 | 85.42 |
[back to top]
Time Required for Rituximab Administration (Subcutaneous [SC] or Intravenous [IV])
Administration time was defined as the time from start to end of the SC injection or from start to end of the IV infusion (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Cycle 1-4, Cycle 5-8 for both SC and IV (Up to 32 weeks)
Intervention | minutes (Median) |
---|
Rituximab Intravenous (IV) | 840 |
Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) | 22 |
[back to top]
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progression or relapse, according to the IWG response criteria. IWG criteria is defined criteria using the following response categories: CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; PR: At least a 50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; SD: participants fails to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but does not fulfill those for PD; PD: Lymph nodes considered abnormal if the long axis is more than 1.5 cm regardless of the short axis. Lymph node has a long axis of 1.1 to 1.5 cm, it is considered abnormal if its short axis is more than 1.0. Lymph nodes <= 1.0 × <= 1.0 cm would not be considered as abnormal for PD. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: From the time of randomization until disease progression or 24 months post treatment follow up or which ever occur first (Up to 4 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|
Arm A | NA |
Arm B | NA |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) Over Rituximab Intravenously (IV) at Cycle 6
Participants who preferred rituximab SC over rituximab IV, along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), were estimated using the patient preference questionnaire (PPQ) after completing cycle 6. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Cycle 6 (Up to 24 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Arm A | 79.1 |
Arm B | 80.6 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: From the time of randomization until disease progression or 24 months post treatment follow up or which ever occur first (Up to 4 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|
Arm A | NA |
Arm B | NA |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Randomization of first participant to clinical cutoff date (Up to 4 years)
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Arm A | 352 |
Arm B | 347 |
[back to top]
Event-free Survival (EFS)
EFS was defined as the time from randomization to first occurrence of progression or relapse according to IWG response criteria. IWG criteria is defined using the following response categories: CR: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; partial response (PR): At least a 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; stable disease (SD): participants fails to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but does not fulfill those for progressive disease (PD); PD: Lymph nodes considered abnormal if the long axis is more than 1.5 centimeter (cm) regardless of the short axis. Lymph node has a long axis of 1.1 to 1.5 cm, it is considered abnormal if its short axis is more than 1.0. Lymph nodes less than or equal to (<=) 1.0 × <= 1.0 cm would not be considered as abnormal for PD. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: From the time of randomization until disease progression or 24 months post treatment follow up or which ever occur first (Up to 4 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|
Arm A | NA |
Arm B | NA |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Indicating a Preference for Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) Over Rituximab Intravenously (IV) at Cycle 8
Participants who preferred rituximab SC over rituximab IV, along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), were estimated using the patient preference questionnaire (PPQ) after completing Cycle 8. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Cycle 8 (Up to 32 weeks)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Arm A | 77.1 |
Arm B | 84.2 |
[back to top]
Disease-free Survival (DFS)
DFS was defined as the period from the data of the initial CR/CRu until the date of relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: From the time of randomization until disease progression or 24 months post treatment follow up or which ever occur first (Up to 4 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|
Arm A | NA |
Arm B | NA |
[back to top]
Complete Response (CR) Rate
CR rate was assessed according to the International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria (CHESON ET AL. 1999) and included CR and CR unconfirmed (CRu). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms, regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of splenomegaly, and absence of bone marrow involvement. CRu was defined as disappearance of clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and absence of splenomegaly, with regression of lymph nodes by > 75 % but still >1.5 cm in size, and indeterminate bone marrow assessment. Tumor assessments were based on computed tomography (CT) scans with contrast of the neck, chest, and abdomen (if detectable by these techniques) or other diagnostic means, if applicable. Other methods (e.g., MRI) were acceptable for participants in whom contrast CT scans were contraindicated. Due to the limited availability of FDG-PET scanners, an FDG-PET scan was not mandated in the study. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: 28 days (± 3 days) after Day 1 of the last dose of induction treatment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Arm A | 49.2 |
Arm B | 52.7 |
[back to top]
Summary of Observed Serum Rituximab Concentration
(NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Pre-dose Cycle 1 to 8, interim staging, final staging, 6, 12 months follow-up, end of study (Up to 4 years)
,
Intervention | microgram per milliter (Mean) |
---|
| Cycle 1 | Cycle 2 | Cycle 3 | Cycle 4 | Interim staging | Cycle 5 | Cycle 6 | Cycle 7 | Cycle 8 | Final staging | Follow-up, 6 months | Follow-up, 12 months | End of study/early treatment termination |
---|
Arm A | 3355.9 | 25053.1 | 62977.0 | 87956.6 | 117273.6 | 108030.9 | 100927.7 | 95614.0 | 104873.0 | 86806.6 | 7802.9 | 2380.1 | 9302.0 |
Arm B | 970.1 | 24541.1 | 46093.9 | 59485.5 | 77665.3 | 70387.3 | 98679.7 | 117172.0 | 137048.1 | 120995.7 | 8042.9 | 1685.3 | 9553.9 |
[back to top]
Rituximab Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (RASQ) Score
The RASQ is a 20-item questionnaire that measures five domains related to the impact of treatment administration. These include physical impact, psychological impact, impact on activities of daily living (ADLs), convenience, and satisfaction. Each domain is scored on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicative of more positive feelings toward therapy. The score for each domain was averaged among all participants. (NCT01724021)
Timeframe: During Cycle 4, 8 of treatment (Up to 32 weeks)
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Physical impact domain | Psychological Impact domain | Impact on activitiesf daily living | Convenience domain | Satisfaction domain |
---|
Rituximab Intravenous (IV) | 82.14 | 77.73 | 59.49 | 59.05 | 74.88 |
Rituximab Subcutaneous (SC) | 82.08 | 84.00 | 81.86 | 81.05 | 87.26 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Rituximab Antibodies Over Time
(NCT01724021)
Timeframe: Pre-dose Cycle 1 to 8, interim staging, final staging, 6, 12 months follow-up, end of study (Up to 4 years)
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Cycle 1 | Cycle 2 | Cycle 3 | Cycle 4 | Interim staging | Cycle 5 | Cycle 6 | Cycle 7 | Cycle 8 | Final staging | Follow-up, 6 months | Follow-up, 12 months | End of study/early treatment termination |
---|
Arm A | 2.0 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 0.6 |
Arm B | 3.0 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
[back to top]
Inflammation Change From Baseline to Day 6
Ocular inflammation was measured by a masked clinician on a 4-point scale 90 minutes after the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) . 0 = best (little to no inflammation), 4 = worst (most inflammation). (NCT01730872)
Timeframe: 90 minutes post CAC
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Prednisolone | -1.2 |
Placebo | -0.19 |
[back to top]
Ocular Redness Change From Baseline to Day 6
Ocular redness was measured by the investigator on a 4-point scale 7 minutes post-CAC. 0 = best (no redness), 4 = worst (most redness). (NCT01730872)
Timeframe: 7 minutes post-CAC
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Prednisolone | -1.1 |
Placebo | 0.31 |
[back to top]
Ocular Itching Change From Baseline to Day 6
Ocular itching was measured by subject on a scale of 0 to 4 where 0 = no itching and 4 = worst itching. This measurement was taken 7 minutes post CAC (NCT01730872)
Timeframe: 7 minutes post-CAC
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Prednisolone | -1.1 |
Placebo | -1.0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +4
A positive RAPD means there are differences between the two eyes in the afferent pathway due to retinal or optic nerve disease. Graded from +1 to +4. The higher one is a better grade (NCT01783847)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | 26 |
Methylprednisolone | 7 |
Observation | 8 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline
Best corrected visual acuity will measure at 1,2,3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month and at least 3 months after treatment. Improvement is defined based on 1) mean logMAR[12], 2) 0.3 change in logMAR (improvement, deterioration, and no change) [12,16] , 3) mean improvement percentage which is calculated as: improvement%= (logMar ( of VA after treatment)-logMar ( of initial VA))/(logMar(20/13)˟-logMar ( of initial VA) 4) percentage of patients at different ordinal categorization of the BCVA as no light perception (NLP), light perception (LP)and hand motion (HM), count fingers (CF), and ≥ 20/200. (NCT01783847)
Timeframe: Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatment
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | 28 |
Methylprednisolone | 3 |
Observation | 5 |
[back to top]
MELD Score at 28 Days
"Model of End Stage Liver Disease Score calculated from serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time (INR). MELD score ranges from 6-40. A higher score indicates a lesser outcome.~The Model for End Stage Liver Disease scoring system is based on the INR, total serum bilirubin and serum creatinine. The measure reflects 90 day prognosis of alcohol associated liver disease from the time of measurement and therefore can only be assessed on subjects who are alive at the specified time point since lab values from that time point are required for the measure." (NCT01809132)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Anakinra & Pentoxifylline & Zinc Sulfate | 22.57 |
Methylprednisolone | 20.95 |
[back to top]
MELD Score at 90 Days
"Model of End Stage Liver Disease Score calculated from serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time (INR). MELD score ranges from 6-40. A higher score indicates a lesser outcome.~The Model for End Stage Liver Disease scoring system is based on the INR, total serum bilirubin and serum creatinine. The measure reflects 90 day prognosis of alcohol associated liver disease from the time of measurement and therefore can only be assessed on subjects who are alive at the specified time point since lab values from that time point are required for the measure." (NCT01809132)
Timeframe: 90 Days
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Anakinra & Pentoxifylline & Zinc Sulfate | 15.50 |
Methylprednisolone | 16.38 |
[back to top]
MELD Score at 180 Days
"Model of End Stage Liver Disease Score calculated from serum bilirubin, serum creatinine, and the international normalized ratio for prothrombin time (INR). MELD score ranges from 6-40. A higher score indicates a lesser outcome.~The Model for End Stage Liver Disease scoring system is based on the INR, total serum bilirubin and serum creatinine. The measure reflects 90 day prognosis of alcohol associated liver disease from the time of measurement and therefore can only be assessed on subjects who are alive at the specified time point since lab values from that time point are required for the measure." (NCT01809132)
Timeframe: 180 Days
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Anakinra & Pentoxifylline & Zinc Sulfate | 15.81 |
Methylprednisolone | 11.85 |
[back to top]
180 Days Mortality
Death at 180 days (NCT01809132)
Timeframe: Time to event up to 6 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Anakinra & Pentoxifylline & Zinc Sulfate | 17 |
Methylprednisolone | 22 |
Observational | 0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 14 and Maintained Through Day 90
BCVA (with spectacles or other visual corrective devices) was reported in letters read correctly, using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) test of 70 letters. Improvement of BCVA was defined as an increase (gain) in the number of letters read, compared to the baseline assessment. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT01853072)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14, and maintained through Day 90
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 61.7 |
Vehicle | 43.0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Who Develop Macular Edema Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery (Day 0)
Macular edema was defined as ≥ 30% Increase from pre-operative baseline in central subfield macular thickness, as measured with Spectral Domain Ocular Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT01853072)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Day 90
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 2.3 |
Vehicle | 17.3 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With a > 5-letter Loss in BCVA From Day 7 to Any Visit [Time Frame: Day 7 up to Any Visit]
(NCT01853072)
Timeframe: Day 7 up to any visit through Day 90
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 15.4 |
Vehicle | 27.3 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 60
(NCT01853072)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 60
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 76.2 |
Vehicle | 64.7 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 90
(NCT01853072)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 90
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 77.2 |
Vehicle | 67.7 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With With a > 10-letter Loss in BCVA From Day 7 to Any Visit
(NCT01853072)
Timeframe: Day 7 up to any visit through Day 90
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 9.1 |
Vehicle | 15.3 |
[back to top]
Immunologic Graft Rejection Episode
Rejection episodes were assessed by slit lamp examination and categorized as definite when an endothelial rejection line was detected in a previously clear graft, probable when inflammation (stromal infiltrate, keratic precipitates, cells in the anterior chamber, or ciliary injection) was detected in a previously clear graft without an endothelial rejection line, and possible if central corneal pachymetry increased by 30 microns or more, even if the cornea was clear and no inflammation was detected by slit lamp examination. (NCT01853696)
Timeframe: within first year after cornea transplantation
Intervention | eyes (Number) |
---|
Loteprednol | 0 |
Prednisolone Acetate | 0 |
[back to top]
Intraocular Pressure
Number of eyes in which the absolute intraocular pressure equaled or exceeded 24 mm Hg OR in which there was a relative increase of at least 10 mm Hg over the baseline preoperative reading. (NCT01853696)
Timeframe: from 1 to 12 months after transplant
Intervention | eyes (Number) |
---|
Loteprednol | 11 |
Prednisolone Acetate | 27 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With a > 5-letter Loss in BCVA From Day 7 to Any Visit
(NCT01872611)
Timeframe: Day 7 up to any visit through Day 90
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 18.7 |
Vehicle | 16.7 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Who Develop Macular Edema Within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery (Day 0)
Macular edema was defined as ≥ 30% Increase from pre-operative baseline in central subfield macular thickness, as measured with Spectral Domain Ocular Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT01872611)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Day 90
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 5.9 |
Vehicle | 14.3 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 90
(NCT01872611)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 90
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 65.4 |
Vehicle | 65.9 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 60
(NCT01872611)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 60
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 68.9 |
Vehicle | 62.1 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With With a > 10-letter Loss in BCVA From Day 7 to Any Visit
(NCT01872611)
Timeframe: Day 7 up to any visit through Day 90
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 10.7 |
Vehicle | 8.9 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥ 15 Letters From Preoperative Baseline to Day 14 and Maintained Through Day 90
BCVA (with spectacles or other visual corrective devices) was reported in letters read correctly, using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) test of 70 letters. Improvement of BCVA was defined as an increase (gain) in the number of letters read, compared to the baseline assessment. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT01872611)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 14, and maintained through Day 90
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Nepafenac | 48.8 |
Vehicle | 50.5 |
[back to top]
To Assess the Proportion of Patients Developing Grade I-IV Acute GvHD
To assess the proportion of patients developing grade I-IV acute GvHD by Day 28, 56, and 180 post DLI. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: Day 28, 56, and 180 post DLI.
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Day 28 | Day 56 | Day 180 |
---|
Transplant Only | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Transplat Plus DLI | 1 | 1 | 0 |
[back to top]
To Assess the Proportions of GvHD Response Post-administration of AP1903.
To assess the proportions of GvHD complete response (CR), partial response (PR), mixed response, no response, and progression among surviving patients at Day 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 post-administration of AP1903. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: Day 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 post-administration of AP1903
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Day 3 post-administration of AP190371985950 | Day 3 post-administration of AP190371985951 | Day 7 post-administration of AP190371985951 | Day 7 post-administration of AP190371985950 | Day 14 post-administration of AP190371985951 | Day 14 post-administration of AP190371985950 | Day 28 post-administration of AP190371985951 | Day 28 post-administration of AP190371985950 | Day 56 post-administration of AP190371985951 | Day 56 post-administration of AP190371985950 |
---|
| no response | complete response | progression | partial response |
---|
Transplat Plus DLI | 1 |
Transplat Plus DLI | 0 |
Transplant Only | 0 |
[back to top]
To Assess the Incidence of GvHD Treatment Failure Post-administration of AP1903.
To assess the incidence of GvHD treatment failure, defined as no response, progression, administration of additional therapy for GvHD, or mortality post-administration of AP1903. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: Day 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56 post-administration of AP1903.
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Day 3 post-administration of AP1903. | Day 7 post-administration of AP1903. | Day 14 post-administration of AP1903. | Day 28 post-administration of AP1903. | Day 56 post-administration of AP1903. |
---|
Transplant Only | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Transplat Plus DLI | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
[back to top]
To Evaluate the Safety of Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Followed by Dimerizer Drug, AP1903 by Number of Participants With Adverse Events.
To evaluate the safety of the infusion of inducible caspase 9 (BPZ-1001) modified T-cells followed by dimerizer drug, AP1903. Safety evaluated by number of participants with Adverse events. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: up to 3.5 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Transplant Only | 0 |
Transplat Plus DLI | 1 |
[back to top]
To Assess the Incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus -PTLD or EBV Reactivation Requiring Therapy Post DLI.
To assess the incidence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated lymphoproliferative disorder or EBV reactivation requiring therapy post DLI. (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: 1 year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Transplant Only | 0 |
Transplat Plus DLI | 1 |
[back to top]
To Assess the Incidence of Acute GvHD Flare After CR/PR Requiring Additional Agent for Systemic Therapy Before Day 56 Post-administration of AP1903.
"To assess participants with incidence of acute GvHD flare after CR/PR requiring additional agent (including 2.5 mg/kg/day of prednisone [or methylprednisolone equivalent of 2 mg/kg/day]) for systemic therapy before Day 56 post-administration of AP1903." (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: before Day 56 post AP1903
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Transplant Only | 0 |
Transplat Plus DLI | 1 |
[back to top]
To Assess Post Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI) Chimerism
To assess the number of Participants with 100% donor chimerism at 6 months post donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Transplant Only | 0 |
Transplat Plus DLI | 1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Assessed Post Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI): Disease-free Survival & Non-relapse Mortality, Chimerism and GVHD.
Participants to assess at 6 months post donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI): disease-free survival & non-relapse mortality, chimerism and GVHD (NCT01875237)
Timeframe: 6 months
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| disease-free survivaI | chimerism post DLI | GVHD post DLI | non-relapse mortality |
---|
Transplant Only | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Transplat Plus DLI | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
[back to top]
Ocular Burning Sensation, Ocular Discharge, Ocular Redness, Ocular Itching, Foreign Body Sensation
Ocular burning sensation, ocular discharge, ocular redness, ocular Itching, and foreign body sensation were measured to evaluate the safety and tolerability of topical tacrolimus 0.05% twice a day in the treatment of patients with ocular GVHD. Safety and tolerability of topical tacrolimus 0.05% twice a day will be monitored by the occurrence of systemic and ocular adverse events in addition to symptoms directly related to the instillation or use of the investigational medication. Subjects will be monitored at each study visit for the occurrence of any adverse events found through examination or patient reports. Tolerability will be evaluated at every visit with a self-response questionnaire that assessed burning sensation, discharge, redness, itchiness, and foreign body sensation on a scale from 0 to 4 (none = 0, trace = 1, mild = 2, moderate = 3, and severe = 4). Where a higher value represents more symptoms (less tolerability). (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Ocular Burning Sensation | Ocular Discharge | Ocular Redness | Ocular Itching | Foreign Body Sensation |
---|
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate | 2.23 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.60 | 0.57 |
Tacrolimus | 3.50 | 0.16 | 1.25 | 0.50 | 0.70 |
[back to top]
Visual Acuity
Visual acuity is measured by asking subjects to read letters on a chart that consists of different rows of letters. Each row of letters corresponds to different levels of visual acuity. The Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) scale generally ranges from 0 to 1, with 0 corresponding to 20/20 vision and 1 corresponding to 20/200 vision. The range from 0-1 is not absolute, however, as patients who have vision better than 20/20 or vision worse than 20/200 will score out side of the 0 to 1 range. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks
Intervention | LogMAR Scale (Mean) |
---|
Tacrolimus | 0.13 |
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate | 0.13 |
[back to top]
Tear Film Break-Up Time
Tear Film Break-Up Time measures the amount of time, in seconds, that the tear film completely coats the ocular surface after each blink. The longer the amount of time the tear film completely coats the ocular surface is considered to be better than a shorter amount of time. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks
Intervention | Seconds (Mean) |
---|
Tacrolimus | 2.6 |
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate | 1.0 |
[back to top]
Schirmer Tear Test (mm)
Schirmer tear test measures the amount of tear secretion produced by a patient in millimeters (mm). Generally, the greater amounts of tear secretion is better than smaller amounts of tear secretion. The minimum value of this scale is 0 mm of tear secretion and there is no maximum value to this scale. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks
Intervention | millimeter (mm) (Mean) |
---|
Tacrolimus | 3.5 |
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate | 3.5 |
[back to top]
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire
The OSDI questionnaire is a 12-question survey used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease. Each of the 12 individual questions rate each of the dry eye symptoms on a 0-4 scale, with 4 meaning that the symptom is present all of the time and 0 meaning the symptom is present none of the time. The overall ODSI score is calculated by adding all of the values from the 12 questions, multiplying that value by 25, and dividing the resulting value by the number of questions answered. This results in an overall scale that ranges from 0-100, with 100 being severe dry eye symptoms and 0 being no dry eye symptoms. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Tacrolimus | 42 |
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate | 28 |
[back to top]
Intraocular Pressure
Intraocular pressure is the measure of the fluid pressure within the eye as measured by tonometry. Intraocular pressure is normally measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). The normal range for intraocular pressure is 12-20 mmHg, there is no better or worse measurement. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks
Intervention | millimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean) |
---|
Tacrolimus | 16.5 |
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate | 17.1 |
[back to top]
Corneal Epitheliopathy (Corneal Fluorescein Staining Using the NEI Grading Scheme)
Corneal fluorescein staining is used to assess the level of corneal epitheliopathy that is related to dry eye disease. The corneal fluorescein staining scale ranges from 0 to 15, with 0 representing the minimum level of corneal epitheliopathy and 15 representing the maximum level of epitheliopathy. (NCT01977781)
Timeframe: 10 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Tacrolimus | 3.7 |
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate | 6.6 |
[back to top]
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. (NCT02006706)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Week 24 |
---|
Rituximab/Methylprednisolone/MTX | 1.91 | 1.05 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Week 24
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and painful joints using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant-rated arthritis activity assessment using visual analog scale [VAS]) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 less than or equal to (≤)3.2 equals (=) low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. (NCT02006706)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Rituximab/Methylprednisolone/MTX | 2.98 |
[back to top]
QALYS at 6 Months (Cross-walk Tariff)
"The Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) is a measure of the state of health of a person/group in which the benefits, in terms of length of life, are adjusted to reflect the quality of life. One QALY is equal to 1 year of life in perfect health. QALYs are calculated by estimating the years of life remaining for a patient following a particular treatment/intervention and weighting each year with a quality-of-life score (on a 0 to 1 scale). It is often measured in terms of the person's ability to carry out the activities of daily life and freedom from pain and mental disturbance. The QALY does not have a maximum score.~Cross-walk tariff: Crosswalk value sets were developed from a study of respondents who completed both the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L. The crosswalk used a non-parametric response mapping method to predict values that are linked to the EQ-5D-3L value set. In short, the cross-walk tariff maps EQ-5D-5L values." (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 0.354 |
Wrist Splint | 0.356 |
[back to top]
QALYS at 24 Months (Cross-walk Tariff)
"The Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) is a measure of the state of health of a person/group in which the benefits, in terms of length of life, are adjusted to reflect the quality of life. One QALY is equal to 1 year of life in perfect health. QALYs are calculated by estimating the years of life remaining for a patient following a particular treatment/intervention and weighting each year with a quality-of-life score (on a 0 to 1 scale). It is often measured in terms of the person's ability to carry out the activities of daily life and freedom from pain and mental disturbance. The QALY does not have a maximum score.~Cross-walk tariff: Crosswalk value sets were developed from a study of respondents who completed both the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L. The crosswalk used a non-parametric response mapping method to predict values that are linked to the EQ-5D-3L value set. In short, the cross-walk tariff maps EQ-5D-5L values." (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 24 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.461 |
Wrist Splint | 1.497 |
[back to top]
QALYS at 12 Months (Cross-walk Tariff)
"The Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) is a measure of the state of health of a person/group in which the benefits, in terms of length of life, are adjusted to reflect the quality of life. One QALY is equal to 1 year of life in perfect health. QALYs are calculated by estimating the years of life remaining for a patient following a particular treatment/intervention and weighting each year with a quality-of-life score (on a 0 to 1 scale). It is often measured in terms of the person's ability to carry out the activities of daily life and freedom from pain and mental disturbance. The QALY does not have a maximum score.~Cross-walk tariff: Crosswalk value sets were developed from a study of respondents who completed both the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L. The crosswalk used a non-parametric response mapping method to predict values that are linked to the EQ-5D-3L value set. In short, the cross-walk tariff maps EQ-5D-5L values." (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 0.723 |
Wrist Splint | 0.736 |
[back to top]
NHS Cost Differences at 6 Months (CC)
Complete case analysis on the cost of interventions at 6 months (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | UK Pounds (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 353.48 |
Wrist Splint | 306.42 |
[back to top]
NHS Cost Differences at 6 Months
Cost of interventions at 6 months (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | UK Pounds (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 346.78 |
Wrist Splint | 313.24 |
[back to top]
NHS Cost Differences at 24 Months
Cost of interventions at 24 months (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 24 months
Intervention | UK Pounds (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 657.87 |
Wrist Splint | 586.77 |
[back to top]
NHS Cost Differences at 12 Months
Cost of interventions at 12 months (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | UK Pounds (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 508.69 |
Wrist Splint | 395.54 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity Over 24 Months: 6 Weeks
Comparison of pain scores between treatment groups across all time points (6 weeks, 6-, 12-, and 24 month follow-up). Scale 0-10, higher score indicates more pain. Results are presented at 6 weeks. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 3.33 |
Wrist Splint | 4.28 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity Over 24 Months: 6 Months
Comparison of pain scores between treatment groups across all time points (6 weeks, 6-, 12-, and 24 month follow-up). Scale 0-10, higher score indicates more pain. Results are presented at 6 months. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 4.11 |
Wrist Splint | 3.29 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity Over 24 Months: 24 Months
Comparison of pain scores between treatment groups across all time points (6 weeks, 6-, 12-, and 24 month follow-up). Scale 0-10, higher score indicates more pain. Results are presented at 24 months. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 24 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.81 |
Wrist Splint | 2.40 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity Over 24 Months: 12 Months
Comparison of pain scores between treatment groups across all time points (6 weeks, 6-, 12-, and 24 month follow-up). Scale 0-10, higher score indicates more pain. Results are presented at 12 months. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 3.17 |
Wrist Splint | 3.14 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Weeks (PP)
Per protocol analysis for comparison of pain scores between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (higher score indicates more pain) on participants with complete data. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 3.33 |
Wrist Splint | 4.44 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Weeks (CC)
Sensitivity analysis for comparison of pain scores between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 0-10, higher score indicates more pain) on participants with complete data. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 3.33 |
Wrist Splint | 4.28 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Weeks
Comparison of pain scores between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (0-10 scale, higher score indicates more pain). (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 3.42 |
Wrist Splint | 4.28 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Months (PP)
Per protocol analysis for comparison of pain scores between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (scale 0-10, higher score indicates more pain) on participants with complete data. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 4.11 |
Wrist Splint | 3.38 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Months (CC)
Sensitivity analysis for comparison of pain scores between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (scale 0-10, higher score indicates more pain) on participants with complete data. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 4.11 |
Wrist Splint | 3.29 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Months
Comparison of BCTQ functional limitations between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (1-5 scale, higher score indicates more functional impairment). BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.91 |
Wrist Splint | 1.89 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Months (CC)
Sensitivity analysis for comparison of BCTQ function limitations between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.85 |
Wrist Splint | 1.88 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Months (PP)
Per protocol analysis for comparison of BCTQ functional limitations between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.89 |
Wrist Splint | 1.84 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Weeks
Comparison of BCTQ functional limitations between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (1-5 scale, higher score indicates more severe functional impairment). BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.88 |
Wrist Splint | 2.09 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Weeks (CC)
Sensitivity analysis for comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.86 |
Wrist Splint | 2.10 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Months
Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (1-5 scale, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment). BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.15 |
Wrist Splint | 2.06 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Months (CC)
Sensitivity analysis for comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.08 |
Wrist Splint | 2.04 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Months (PP)
Per protocol analysis for comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.09 |
Wrist Splint | 2.02 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (Complete Case Analysis (CC))
Sensitivity analysis for comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.95 |
Wrist Splint | 2.29 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (Per-Protocol Analysis (PP))
Per protocol analysis for comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.96 |
Wrist Splint | 2.28 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (SG, Did Not Receive the Intervention of Their Preference)
Subgroup analysis was performed in patients who did not receive the intervention of their preference. Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.15 |
Wrist Splint | 2.40 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (SG, Did Not State a Preference of Intervention)
Subgroup analysis was performed in patients who did not state a preference of intervention. Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.03 |
Wrist Splint | 2.26 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (SG, Preferred Injection)
Subgroup analysis was performed in patients who preferred injection. Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.88 |
Wrist Splint | 2.40 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (SG, Preferred Splint)
Subgroup analysis was performed in patients who preferred splint. Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.15 |
Wrist Splint | 2.40 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations 6 Weeks (Subgroup Analysis (SG), Intervention of Their Preference)
Subgroup analysis was performed in patients who were allocated the intervention of their preference. Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment) on participants with complete data. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.88 |
Wrist Splint | 2.19 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations Over 24 Months: 12 Months
Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups across all time points (6 weeks, 6-, 12-, and 24 month follow-up). Scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment). Results are presented at 12 months. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.98 |
Wrist Splint | 2.05 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations Over 24 Months: 6 Months
Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups across all time points (6 weeks, 6-, 12-, and 24 month follow-up. Scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment. Results are presented at 6 months. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.08 |
Wrist Splint | 2.04 |
[back to top]
Hand-wrist Pain Intensity 6 Months
Comparison of pain scores between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up. 0-10 scale, higher score indicates more pain. (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 4.32 |
Wrist Splint | 3.46 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Weeks (PP)
"Per protocol analysis for comparison of BCTQ symptom severity between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms) on participants with complete data. BCTQ:~Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire" (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.07 |
Wrist Splint | 2.44 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Weeks (CC)
"Sensitivity analysis for comparison of BCTQ symptom severity between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms) on participants with complete data. BCTQ:~Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire" (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.07 |
Wrist Splint | 2.44 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Weeks
Comparison of BCTQ symptom severity between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms). BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.12 |
Wrist Splint | 2.43 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Months (PP)
"Per protocol analysis for comparison of BCTQ symptom severity between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms) on participants with complete data. BCTQ:~Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire" (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.28 |
Wrist Splint | 2.15 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Months (CC)
"Sensitivity analysis for comparison of BCTQ symptom severity between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms) on participants with complete data. BCTQ:~Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire" (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.29 |
Wrist Splint | 2.16 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity Subscale 6 Months
Comparison of BCTQ symptom severity between treatment groups at 6 months follow-up (1-5 scale, higher score indicates more severe symptoms). BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.33 |
Wrist Splint | 2.18 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations Over 24 Months: 6 Weeks
Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups across all time points (6 weeks, 6-, 12-, and 24 month follow-up). Scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment. Results are presented at 6 weeks. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.95 |
Wrist Splint | 2.30 |
[back to top]
BCTQ Functional Limitations Subscale 6 Weeks (PP)
"Per protocol analysis for comparison of BCTQ functional limitations between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more functional impairment) on participants with complete data.~BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire" (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.88 |
Wrist Splint | 2.06 |
[back to top]
Symptom Severity and Limitations in Hand Function as Assessed by the BCTQ 6 Weeks
Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups at 6 weeks follow-up (scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment). BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 2.02 |
Wrist Splint | 2.29 |
[back to top]
Secondary: BCTQ Symptom Severity and Functional Limitations Over 24 Months: 24 Months
Comparison of overall BCTQ between treatment groups across all time points (6 weeks, 6-, 12-, and 24 month follow-up). Scale 1-5, higher score indicates more severe symptoms and functional impairment. Results are presented at 24 months. BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (NCT02038452)
Timeframe: 24 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Steroid Injection | 1.79 |
Wrist Splint | 1.73 |
[back to top]
Percentages of Patients Experiencing Grade 3+ Peripheral Neuropathy Assessed by Modified Balis Scale
"The percentages of patients experiencing grade 3+ peripheral neuropathy assessed by the treating clinician using the modified Balis scale. The Modified Balis scale of Pediatric Neuropathy allows clinicians to assign a score for sensory or motor neuropathy symptoms separately. Scores range from 1 to 4 with 1 being the least symptomatic state and 4 indicating a severe debility. The percentages of patients (with a score >/=3) will be compared between the 2 arms by two-sample Z test at 1-sided alpha level of 0.05." (NCT02166463)
Timeframe: From the enrollment of the patient to the time of analysis or the last follow-up; an average of 3.6 years.
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
Arm I (ABVE-PC) | 5.5 |
ARM II (Bv-AVEPC) | 6.7 |
[back to top]
Event Free Survival (EFS), Where Events Include Disease Progression or Relapse, Second Malignancy, or Death
Primary analysis will be based 1-sided log rank test comparison of EFS curves between the 2 randomized arms per intention-to-treat principle. Progression is defined as an ≥50% increase of in the product of the perpendicular diameters of any of the involved nodes or nodal masses or focal organ lesions in sites that were persistently PET positive; or recurrent PET positive lesions (Deauville 4, 5) in sites that had previously been PET negative regardless of change of size, as was the development of new PET avid measurable lesion(s) >1.5cm in any axis, or new sites of assessable disease. Relapse is defined in patients who achieved a prior CR but subsequently has an increase of ≥50% of the PPD in prior nodal or extranodal sites in a recurrently PET positive lesion(s), or the development of new measurable lesion(s) >1.5cm in any axis, or new sites of assessable disease. Second malignancy is defined based on report of a cancer that is not considered to be classic Hodgkin Lymphoma. (NCT02166463)
Timeframe: Up to 48 months after the last enrollment
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Arm I (ABVE-PC) | 82.5 |
ARM II (Bv-AVEPC) | 92.1 |
[back to top]
Percentages of Patients With Early Response Defined as no Slow Responding Lesions (SRL) and no Progressive Disease (PD) at Any Disease Sites Determined by Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Per Deauville Criteria Through Central Review
The percentages of patients (with available PET scan) with no SRL and no PD will be compared between the two randomized arms to see if brentuximab vedotin in the chemotherapy backbone of doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine sulfate, etoposide, prednisone and cyclophosphamide (Bv-AVEPC) arm has a higher rate of early response compared to doxorubicin hydrochloride, bleomycin sulfate, vincristine sulfate, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC) arm. Two-sample Z test of proportions at 1-sided alpha level of 0.05 will be used for these comparisons. (NCT02166463)
Timeframe: After 42 days of chemotherapy
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
Arm I (ABVE-PC) | 80.7 |
ARM II (Bv-AVEPC) | 81.2 |
[back to top]
Bayley III Gross Motor Scaled Score (Change From Baseline to 12 Month)
Bayley III Gross Motor Scaled Score measures motor development. This is normed for typically developing children and follow a bell shaped curve. The scale has mean of 10 +/-3 for children at all ages and is bell shaped. Therefore the two standard deviation range is 16 to 4 with higher values indicated better performance. Lower values have been shown to be common in boys with DMD and it this study the baseline average score was 4.2. (NCT02167217)
Timeframe: One year
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Oral Prednisolone | 4.8 |
[back to top]
GVHD-free Survival Rate
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) free survival is defined as achieving complete response without death or relapse or requiring secondary immunosuppressive therapy . Proportions are reported descriptively. GVHD-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02176031)
Timeframe: Day 56
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
Natalizumab | 33.3 |
[back to top]
Rate of GVHD Flares
Number of subjects who experienced graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) flares requiring therapy after initial complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by day 28 after the first dose of Natalizumab. (NCT02176031)
Timeframe: by Day 28
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Natalizumab | 0 |
[back to top]
GI aGVHD Response Rate
Gastrointestinal (GI) acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) Response is defined by complete response, very good partial response, or partial response in signs and symptoms of GI aGVHD. (NCT02176031)
Timeframe: Day 28, Day 56
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
| Overall response rate for GI GVHD at Day 28 | Overall response rate for GI GVHD at Day 56 |
---|
Natalizumab | 57 | 52 |
[back to top]
Graft-verus-host Disease (GVHD) Response Rate
"Complete Response (CR) is defined as resolution of all signs and symptoms of acute GVHD.~Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) is defined by no rash or residual erythematous rash involving less than 25% of the body surface, and total serum bilirubin concentration less than 2 mg/dL or less than 25% of baseline at enrollment and tolerating food or enteral feeding, predominantly formed stools, no overt gastrointestinal bleeding or abdominal cramping, and no more than occasional nausea and vomiting.~Partial Response (PR) is defined as an improvement of one stage in one or more organs without progression in any other organ.~Non-response (NR) is defined as no reduction in any GVHD organ staging.~Progression is defined as either new organ involvement on day +8 or thereafter, or increased organ specific symptoms sufficient to increase the organ stage by one or more or the initiation of an additional GVHD agent.~Overall Response Rate (ORR) is the sum of CR, VGPR, and PR." (NCT02176031)
Timeframe: 28 Days, 56 Days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Overall Response at Day 28 | Complete Response at Day 28 | Very Good Partial Response at Day 28 | Partial Response at Day 28 | Non-response/Progression of GVHD at Day 28 | Overall Response at Day 56 | Complete Response at Day 56 | Very Good Partial Response at Day 56 | Partial Response at Day 56 | Non-response/Progression of GVHD at Day 56 |
---|
Natalizumab | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
[back to top]
Percentage Steroid Dose Was Reduced at Day 28, 56, and 100 in Comparison to Steroid Dose at First Administration of Natalizumab.
Median percentage steroid dose was reduced at Day 28, Day 56, and Day 100 in comparison to steroid dose at first administration of Natalizumab. (NCT02176031)
Timeframe: Day 28, 56, and 100
Intervention | percentage of steroid dose (Median) |
---|
| Median reduction in steroid dose at day 28 | Median reduction in steroid dose at day 56 | Median reduction in steroid dose at day 100 |
---|
Natalizumab | 42 | 71 | 85 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS) Rate
Overall survival (OS) is defined from the date of natalizumab infusion to death or censored at last clinical evaluation. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02176031)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|
Natalizumab | 43 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Secondary Graft Failure
"The cumulative incidence of secondary graft failure will be estimated using the Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. Deaths due to toxicity and relapse before day 100 are the competing events.~Secondary graft failure or graft rejection will be defined as no evidence of donor chimerism by umbilical cord blood (UCB) and/or haploidentical donor (<10%), or too few cells to perform adequate chimerism analysis, in research participants with prior neutrophil engraftment.~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who experienced secondary graft failure is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: 100 days after transplantation
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Treatment | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
"The Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS with relapse, death due to any cause and graft failure as events along with their standard errors will be calculated using the SAS macro (bmacro251-Excel2007kme) available in the Department of Biostatistics at St. Jude, where OS = min (date of last follow-up, date of death) - date of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and all participants surviving after 1 year post-transplant will be considered as censored.~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who did not die at 1 year post-transplant is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: One year after transplantation
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Treatment | 6 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment
Neutrophil engraftment is defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery of ≥ 0.5 x 10^9/L (500/mm^3) for three consecutive laboratory values obtained on different days (derived from either donor). Date of engraftment is the date of the first of the three consecutive laboratory values. The number of patients engrafted by day +42 post-transplant is provided. (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: Until day 42 post-transplant
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Treatment | 11 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Event-free Survival (EFS)
"The Kaplan-Meier estimate of EFS with relapse, death due to any cause and graft failure as events along with their standard errors will be calculated using the SAS macro (bmacro251-Excel2007kme) available in the Department of Biostatistics at St. Jude, where EFS = min (date of last follow-up, date of relapse, date of graft failure, date of death due to any cause) - date of transplant, and all participants surviving at the time of analysis without events will be censored. The number of participants who did not experience any of these events through one year post-transplant is given.~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who did not experience any events defined above is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: One year after transplantation
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Treatment | 4 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Malignant Relapse
"Relapse was evaluated using standard World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for each disease. The estimate of cumulative incidence of relapse will be estimated using Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. Relapse defined as the recurrence of original disease. Death is the competing risk event. The analysis will be implemented using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) macro (bmacro252-Excel2007cin).~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who experienced malignant relapse is provided" (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: One year after transplantation
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Treatment | 7 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants by Severity With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the First 100 Days After HCT
"Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was estimated using Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. Death is competing risk event. SAS macro (bmacro252-Excel2007cin) available St. Jude was used for such analysis. Severity of chronic GVHD was evaluated using National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Global Severity Scoring. Mild is considered a better outcome with severe being the worst.~Criteria for grading chronic GVHD:~Mild: 1-2 organs/sites, maximum organ score of 1, and lung score of 1. Moderate: 3 or more organs/sites and maximum organ score of 1 and lung score of 1, OR at least 1 organ/site and maximum organ score of 2 and lung score of 1. Severe: At least 1 organ/site and maximum organ score of 3 and lung score of 2-3.~Due to the early close of the study, a small number of patients were enrolled. Subsequently, the number of patients who experienced chronic GVHD is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: 100 days after transplantation
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| No Chronic GVHD | Mild | Moderate | Severe |
---|
Treatment | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants by Severity With Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in the First 100 Days After HCT
"Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD was estimated using Kalbfleisch-Prentice method. Death is the competing risk event. SAS macro (bmacro252-Excel2007cin) available at St. Jude was used for analysis. Severity of GVHD and stage were determined using the Clinical Oncology Group (COG) Stem Cell Committee Consensus Guidelines for establishing organ stage and overall grade of acute GVHD. Participants are graded on a scale from I to IV, with I being mild and IV being severe.~Overall Clinical Grade (based on the highest stage obtained):~Grade 0: No stage 1-4 of any organ. Grade I: Stage 1-2 skin and no liver or gut involvement. Grade II: Stage 3 skin, or Stage I liver involvement, or Stage 1 gastrointestinal (GI).~Grade III: Stage 0-3 skin, with Stage 2-3 liver, or Stage 2-3 GI. Grade IV: Stage 4 skin, liver or GI involvement.~Due to early close of study, a small number of patients were enrolled. The number of patients who experienced acute GVHD is provided." (NCT02199041)
Timeframe: 100 days after transplantation
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| No Acute GVHD | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | Grade IV |
---|
Treatment | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
[back to top]
Change in Subject Reported Shoulder Pain as Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale
Change in shoulder pain reported by the subject after injection at 6 weeks. The subject will report shoulder pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal pain) after injection. A 2 point change is expected. (NCT02242630)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone, 20 mg | 1.0 |
Methylprednisolone, 40 mg | 1.8 |
Triamcinolone, 20 mg | 1.9 |
Triamcinolone, 40 mg | 1.8 |
[back to top]
Change in Shoulder Function, as Measured by the QuickDASH ®
The primary outcome of this study will be to compare the dose and type of intrabursal corticosteroid received to improvements in a functional measure of the shoulder, the QuickDASH. The QuickDASH is a validated questionnaire of shoulder function consisting of 11 questions with a score from 100 (maximal dysfunction) to 0 (no dysfunction). It is expected that improvements will lead to at least a 10 point improvement (minimal clinically important difference) (NCT02242630)
Timeframe: 6 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone, 20 mg | 19.2 |
Methylprednisolone, 40 mg | 21.3 |
Triamcinolone, 20 mg | 19.1 |
Triamcinolone, 40 mg | 24.7 |
[back to top]
Tear Break Up Time (TBUT)
TBUT measures the amount of time, in seconds, a dry spot appears in the tear film after each blink. Values less than 10 seconds are considered abnormal. (NCT02256969)
Timeframe: 4 week Time Point
Intervention | Seconds (Mean) |
---|
Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Lubricant | 3.5 |
Sham Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Lubricant | 4.2 |
Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Blephamide | 3.2 |
[back to top]
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
A 12-question survey used to measure the symptoms of dry eye disease. Each of the 12 individual questions rate one symptom on a 0-4 scale, with 4 meaning that the symptom is present all of the time and 0 meaning the symptom is present none of the time. The overall ODSI score is calculated by adding all of the values from the 12 questions, multiplying that value by 25, and dividing the resulting value by the number of questions answered. This results in an overall scale that ranges from 0-100, with 100 being severe dry eye symptoms and 0 being no dry eye symptoms. (NCT02256969)
Timeframe: 4 week Time Point
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Lubricant | 38.7 |
Sham Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Lubricant | 36.9 |
Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Blephamide | 37.3 |
[back to top]
Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE)
A two-item survey used to assess the frequency and severity of dry eye disease. The SANDE score is calculated by taking the square root of the product of the frequency of symptoms score and the severity of symptoms score. The SANDE scale ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being the maximal amount of dry eye symptoms and 0 being the minimal amount of dry eye symptoms. (NCT02256969)
Timeframe: 4 week Time Point
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Lubricant | 49.1 |
Sham Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Lubricant | 50.2 |
Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Blephamide | 47.6 |
[back to top]
Corneal Fluorescein Staining (CFS)
Is used to assess the level of corneal epitheliopathy that is related to dry eye disease. The CFS scale ranges from 0 to 15 scale, with 0 representing the minimum level of corneal epitheliopathy and 15 representing the maximum level of epitheliopathy. (NCT02256969)
Timeframe: 4 week Time Point
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Lubricant | 2.4 |
Sham Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Lubricant | 2.0 |
Meibomian Gland Probing Plus Blephamide | 1.4 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Grade 4 Hypogammaglobulinemia by Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
The percentage of participants who experienced Grade 4 hypogammaglobulinemia, defined as having a serum Immunoglobulin G (IgG) level < 300 mg/dL. Severity of adverse events (AEs) was classified using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03:June 14, 2010). (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 0 to Week 24 | Week 0 to Week 48 | Week 0 to Week 96 |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With B Cell Reconstitution at Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
"The percentage of participants who achieved B cell reconstitution, defined as a peripheral blood total B cell count ≥ to the baseline count or the lower limit of normal, whichever was lower. Note: B cell depletion was expected to occur in this study between Weeks 0 and 4, after initiation of rituximab and cyclophosphamide.~Normal peripheral blood B Cell count: 107 to 698 cells/µL." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
,
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 24 | Week 48 | Week 96 |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 31.3 | 35.7 | 40.0 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 6.3 | 11.8 | 30.8 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With At Least One Grade 3 or Higher Infectious Adverse Event By Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
"The percentage of participants who experienced at least one Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent infectious adverse event. The severity of adverse events (AEs) was classified into grades using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03:June 14, 2010). Treatment-emergent AEs are those:~with an onset date on or after the first dose of study medication,~with onset before first dose but that worsened in severity after first dose, and~for which the start of the AE in relation to the start of study medication could not be established.~AEs were classified by system organ class and preferred term according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 17.0. Grade 3 or higher AEs were classified infectious based on the study team's review of the MedDRA body systems and preferred terms of the AEs." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 96
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 0 to Week 24 | Week 0 to Week 48 | Week 0 to Week 96 |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 9.1 | 22.7 | 27.3 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 4.8 | 9.5 | 9.5 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
"The percentage of participants who achieved an overall response, defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~>50% improvement in the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) from study entry, based on a 24-hour collection;~Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥120 ml/min/1.73 m^2 calculated by the CKD-EPI formula or, if < 120 ml/min/1.73 m^2, then > 80% of eGFR at entry; and~Prednisone dose tapered to 10 mg/day and adherence to prednisone dosing provisions." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 24 | Week 48 | Week 96 |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 46.7 | 60.0 | 53.3 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 55.0 | 73.7 | 71.4 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With an Negative Anti-dsDNA Result at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
"The percentage of participants who were anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) negative, defined as having anti-dsDNA levels <30 IU/mL.~Anti-dsDNA levels are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 24 | Week 48 | Week 96 |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 14.3 | 20.0 | 0.0 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 15.8 | 30.0 | 27.8 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
"The percentage of participants who achieved a complete response, defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) < 0.5, based on a 24-hour collection;~Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 120 ml/min/1.73 m^2 calculated by the CKD-EPI formula or, if < 120 ml/min/1.73 m^2, then > 80% of eGFR at entry; and~Prednisone dose tapered to 10 mg/day and adherence to prednisone dosing provisions." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 24 | Week 48 | Week 96 |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 23.8 | 35.0 | 33.3 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 30.0 | 42.1 | 42.9 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Hypocomplementemic for Complement Component C4 at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
"The percentage of participants who were hypocomplementemic for complemen component C4, defined as a C4 level <10 mg/dL.~Serum C4 complement is a protein which can be measured in the blood. Low blood levels of C4 are common in those with active lupus." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 24 | Week 48 | Week 96 |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 19.0 | 15.0 | 16.7 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 5.0 | 15.0 | 11.1 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Hypocomplementemic for Complement Component C3 at Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
"The percentage of participants who were hypocomplementemic for complement component, C3, defined as a C3 level <90 mg/dL.~Serum C3 complement is a protein which can be measured in the blood. Low blood levels of C3 are common in those with active lupus." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 24 | Week 48 | Week 96 |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 57.1 | 55.0 | 61.1 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 30.0 | 30.0 | 27.8 |
[back to top]
Frequency of Specific Adverse Events of Interest By Participant, By Week 96
"Number of participants who experienced ≥Grade 2 specific treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of interest. Grade 2 or higher AEs were classified according to the listed categories of interest based on the study team's review of the AEs.~Treatment-emergent AEs are those:~with an onset date on or after the first dose of study medication,~with onset before first dose but that worsened in severity after first dose, and~for which the start of the AE in relation to the start of study medication could not be established.~The severity of AEs was classified using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03: June 14, 2010). AEs were classified by system organ class and preferred term according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 17.0." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 96
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Any event leading to death | ≥Grade 2 leukopenia or thrombocytopenia | Premature ovarian failure | Malignancy | Venous thromboembolic event |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[back to top]
Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 96
"Count of participants who experienced non-renal flares, defined as any new A finding in a non-renal organ system in the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment. A BILAG A finding represents a significant increase in, or a new manifestation of, disease activity." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 96
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| 0 Non-renal flares | 1 Non-renal flare | 2 Non-renal flares |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 18 | 4 | 0 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 19 | 1 | 1 |
[back to top]
Frequency of Specific Adverse Events of Interest By Event by Week 96
"Number of ≥ Grade 2 specific treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of interest. Grade 2 or higher AEs were classified according to the listed categories of interest based on the study team's review of the AEs.~Treatment-emergent AEs are those:~with an onset date on or after the first dose of study medication,~with onset before first dose but that worsened in severity after first dose, and~for which the start of the AE in relation to the start of study medication could not be established.~The severity of AEs was classified using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v4.03: June 14, 2010). AEs were classified by system organ class and preferred term according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 17.0." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 96
,
Intervention | Events (Number) |
---|
| Any event leading to death | ≥Grade 2 leukopenia or thrombocytopenia | Premature ovarian failure | Malignancy | Venous thromboembolic event |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure by Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96
The percentage of participants who met the criteria for treatment failure, defined by withdrawal from the protocol treatment regimen due to worsening nephritis, infection, or study medication toxicity. (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
,
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 0 to Week 24 | Week 0 to Week 48 | Week 0 to Week 96 |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 18.2 | 45.5 | 63.6 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 14.3 | 28.6 | 47.6 |
[back to top]
Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 24
"Count of participants who experienced non-renal flares, defined as any new A finding in a non-renal organ system in the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment. A BILAG A finding represents a significant increase in, or a new manifestation of, disease activity." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 24
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| 0 Non-renal flares | 1 Non-renal flare | 2 Non-renal flares |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 21 | 1 | 0 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 20 | 0 | 1 |
[back to top]
Count of Participants: Frequency of Non-renal Flares by Week 48
"Count of participants who experienced non-renal flares, defined as any new A finding in a non-renal organ system in the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) assessment. A BILAG A finding represents a significant increase in, or a new manifestation of, disease activity." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 48
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| 0 Non-renal flares | 1 Non-renal flares | 2 Non-renal flare |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 20 | 2 | 0 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 20 | 0 | 1 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Complete Response
"The percentage of participants who achieved a sustained complete response, defined as a complete response achieved at Week 48 and Week 96.~Complete response was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:~Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) < 0.5, based on a 24-hour collection;~Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥120 ml/min/1.73 m^2 calculated by the CKD-EPI formula or, if < 120 ml/min/1.73 m^2, then > 80% of eGFR at entry; and~Prednisone dose tapered to 10 mg/day and adherence to prednisone dosing provisions." (NCT02260934)
Timeframe: Week 48, Week 96
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide (RC) | 26.7 |
Rituximab/Cyclophosphamide/Belimumab (RCB) | 28.6 |
[back to top]
Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Z-score and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
"MSFC score is a composite score calculated from 3 tests: 1) Timed 25-Foot walk (leg function); 2) 9-Hole Peg Test (arm function); and 3) Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (cognitive function). The results are combined to create a single score (the MSFC Z-Score) to measure performance and change over time in subjects with MS. MSFC Z-score = {Z arm + Z leg + Z cognitive} / 3.0. A positive score indicates that, on average, an individual performed better than the reference population and a negative score indicates that, on average, an individual performed worse than the reference population.~The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is used to quantify disability due to symptoms of MS and to track changes in disability status over time. Scores range from 0 (normal neurological exam) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Scores are determined by performing a neurological exam and given in increments of 0.5." (NCT02296346)
Timeframe: 1 year
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| EDSS Score | MSFC Z-Score |
---|
Corticosteroid Arm | 6.25 | 0.6751 |
ECP Arm | 6 | 1.1031 |
[back to top]
Anterior Chamber Cell Grade at Week 8
Change from baseline comparison of NS2 ophthalmic drops (0.5%), NS2 (0.5%) and Pred Forte® (0.1%) ophthalmic drops, and Pred Forte® (1%) ophthalmic drops on an anterior chamber cell grade scale of 0 to 4 (0 = absent, 4 = severe). The least squares mean (standard error) was derived from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline as a covariate and treatment group as a factor. (NCT02406209)
Timeframe: The efficacy assessment period was assessed at Week 8; baseline was Day 1.
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|
NS2 Ophthalmic Drops (0.5%) | -0.7 |
NS2 (0.5%) and Pred Forte® (0.1%) Ophthalmic Drops | -0.9 |
Pred Forte® (1%) Ophthalmic Drops | -0.5 |
[back to top]
Relapse Free Survival
Relapse-free survival was defined as the time from treatment response to date of relapse or death, whichever occurred first. (NCT02464657)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years and10 Months
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|
Ph 2 - Nivolumab (3mg) + Idarubicin + Cytarabine | 18.54 |
[back to top]
Event-Free Survival (EFS)
EFS defined as time from the treatment start till treatment failure, relapse, or death whichever comes first. Event Free Survival will be presented by median EFS, which is the time point at which the cumulative survival drops below 50%. If there is no median survival (not reached), it means the cumulative survival was more than 50%. (NCT02464657)
Timeframe: 56 days
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|
Ph 2 Nivolumab (3mg) + Idarubicin + Cytarabine | NA |
[back to top]
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Nivolumab
MTD is highest dose level in which <2 patients of 6 develop first cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). (NCT02464657)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | mg/kg (Number) |
---|
Ph 1 - Nivolumab (1mg) + Idarubicin + Cytarabine | NA |
Ph 1 - Nivolumab (3mg) + Idarubicin + Cytarabine | 3 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time from the start of treatment to death or date of last follow-up. (NCT02464657)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years and 10 Months
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|
Ph 2 Nivolumab (3mg) + Idarubicin + Cytarabine | 18.54 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Intraocular pressure refers to the pressure inside the eye. It is measured in mmHg using a device called a tonometer. The mean IOP is 15.5 mmHg. Raised IOP after cataract surgery is common and in most cases it is transient and benign. (NCT02515045)
Timeframe: Month 1.
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|
TriMoxiVanc | -0.5 |
TriMoxiVanc + Ilevro | -1.03 |
Control | -1.1 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Macular Thickness
Macula is the area in the retina that is responsible for the best central vision. Changes in its thickness may occur after cataract surgery due to the normal inflammatory process that occurs postoperatively but it returns to preoperative values unless there is an underlying disease. (NCT02515045)
Timeframe: Month 1.
Intervention | Microns (Mean) |
---|
TriMoxiVanc | 12.34 |
TriMoxiVanc + Ilevro | 10.96 |
Control | 9.84 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Pachymetry (Corneal Thickness)
"Cornea is the clear part of the front of the eye. Normal corneal thickness is in average 0.540 mm. The corneal thickness is measured with a handheld device called pachymeter.~An increase in corneal thickness may indicate corneal edema (swelling of the cornea) that could be seen after ocular surgery." (NCT02515045)
Timeframe: Month 1
Intervention | Microns (Mean) |
---|
TriMoxiVanc | 14.44 |
TriMoxiVanc + Ilevro | 5.94 |
Control | 4.47 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Fear Swallow)
SWAL-QOL survey - Fear swallow domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 100 | 93.75 | 87.5 | 93.75 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Treatment | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
Patients' Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale - Left Arm Pain
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Left arm pain Range from 0 to 100 (best-worst) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Pre-Op, Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 17.5 | 10 | 5 | 6.45 | 5.8 | 2 | 4 |
Treatment | 19 | 5.35 | 6.45 | 2.75 | 2.5 | 1.175 | 1 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Eating Duration)
SWAL-QOL survey - Eating duration domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 100 | 75 | 50 | 87.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Treatment | 100 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
Patients' Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale - Neck Pain
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Neck pain Range from 0 to 100 (best-worst) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Pre-Op, Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 54.5 | 51.5 | 51 | 20 | 22 | 14 | 12.25 |
Treatment | 26 | 48.25 | 26.5 | 14.5 | 9.5 | 6 | 6.5 |
[back to top]
Patients' Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale - Right Arm Pain
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Right arm pain Range from 0 to 100 (best-worst) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Pre-Op, Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 20 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 3.5 |
Treatment | 15.5 | 2.25 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.4 |
[back to top]
Patients' Bazaz Dysphagia Score - Liquid
Bazaz dysphagia scale defines dysphagia as none, mild, moderate and severe, depending on patients' symptoms with solid and liquid foods. (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Pre-Op, Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Pre-operative72323489 | Pre-operative72323488 | POD172323488 | POD172323489 | POD272323488 | POD272323489 | 6-4 weeks72323488 | 6-4 weeks72323489 | 3 months72323488 | 3 months72323489 | 6 months72323489 | 6 months72323488 | 1 year72323488 | 1 year72323489 |
---|
| None | Rare |
---|
Control | 47 |
Treatment | 54 |
Control | 6 |
Treatment | 2 |
Control | 20 |
Treatment | 36 |
Control | 33 |
Treatment | 20 |
Control | 17 |
Treatment | 23 |
Control | 34 |
Treatment | 31 |
Treatment | 39 |
Control | 18 |
Treatment | 17 |
Control | 39 |
Control | 11 |
Treatment | 13 |
Control | 42 |
Treatment | 41 |
Control | 9 |
Treatment | 10 |
Control | 35 |
Treatment | 40 |
Control | 10 |
Treatment | 7 |
[back to top]
Patients' Bazaz Dysphagia Score - Solid
Bazaz dysphagia scale defines dysphagia as none, mild, moderate and severe, depending on patients' symptoms with solid and liquid foods. (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Pre-Op, Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Pre-operative72323488 | Pre-operative72323489 | POD172323488 | POD172323489 | POD272323488 | POD272323489 | 6-4 weeks72323489 | 6-4 weeks72323488 | 3 months72323488 | 3 months72323489 | 6 months72323488 | 6 months72323489 | 1 year72323489 | 1 year72323488 |
---|
| Rare | Occasionally (only with specific food) | None | Frequent (majority of solids) |
---|
Control | 44 |
Treatment | 52 |
Treatment | 17 |
Control | 8 |
Control | 21 |
Treatment | 18 |
Control | 6 |
Treatment | 15 |
Treatment | 13 |
Control | 19 |
Control | 17 |
Treatment | 27 |
Control | 18 |
Treatment | 16 |
Control | 11 |
Treatment | 11 |
Treatment | 2 |
Control | 25 |
Treatment | 34 |
Treatment | 8 |
Control | 12 |
Control | 2 |
Treatment | 0 |
Control | 30 |
Treatment | 37 |
Control | 15 |
Treatment | 10 |
Control | 5 |
Treatment | 3 |
Control | 1 |
Treatment | 1 |
Control | 29 |
Treatment | 35 |
Control | 7 |
Treatment | 6 |
Control | 9 |
Treatment | 4 |
Control | 0 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Food Selection)
SWAL-QOL survey - Food Selection domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 100 | 75 | 62.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Treatment | 100 | 93.75 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Mental)
SWAL-QOL survey - Mental domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 100 | 80 | 85 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Treatment | 100 | 100 | 97.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Sleep)
SWAL-QOL survey - Sleep domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 75 | 62.5 | 50 | 50 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 75 |
Treatment | 81.25 | 56.25 | 62.5 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 87.5 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Burden)
SWAL-QOL survey - Burden domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 100 | 50 | 62.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Treatment | 100 | 75 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Social)
SWAL-QOL survey - Social domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 100 | 95 | 85 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Treatment | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Swallowing Difficulty Over 1 Year
"The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) is used to screen for self-perceived oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in community-dwelling elders. A summated EAT-10 total score ranges from 0 to 40, with a score ≥ 3 indicative of OD.~Modified Eat-10 : Eat-10 questionnaire without questions 1 (My swallowing problem has caused me to lose weight) and 2 (My swallowing problem interferes with my ability to go out for meals) to be applicable during hospitalization.~Eat-10 interpretation: Score ranging from 0 to 40 (best-worst)~each question response is 0-4, 0=no problem and 4=severe problem; score is a summation of each question's response Modified EAT-10 interpretation: Score ranging from 0 to 32 (best-worst)~each question response is 0-4, 0=no problem and 4=severe problem; score is a summation of each question's response" (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Pre-Op, Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative Eat-10 | Pre-operative Eat-10 modified | POD1 Eat-10 | POD1 Eat-10 modified | POD2 Eat-10 | POD2 Eat-10 modified | 4-6 weeks Eat-10 | 4-6 weeks Eat-10 modified | 3 months Eat-10 | 3 months Eat-10 modified | 6 months Eat-10 | 6 months Eat-10 modified | 1 year Eat-10 | 1 year Eat-10 modified |
---|
Control | 0 | 0 | 16 | 14 | 16 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Treatment | 0 | 0 | 9 | 8.5 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[back to top]
Patients' Neck Disability
Neck Disability Index (NDI) Range from 0 to 100 (best-worst) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Pre-Op, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | index (Mean) |
---|
| Pre-operative | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 35.5 | 35.3 | 27.3 | 23.9 | 20.6 |
Treatment | 29.9 | 30.8 | 17.7 | 15.4 | 13.2 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Eating Desire)
SWAL-QOL survey - Eating desire domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 100 | 83.3 | 83.3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Treatment | 100 | 87.5 | 91.7 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Communication)
SWAL-QOL survey - Communication domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Treatment | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
Adverse Event
"Adverse Event (AE) following surgical treatment.~Adverse event were classified by severity based on the AO-ISSG criteria and treatment required:~Mild: Observed, medication, consult, X-ray. Essentially any management that was quick and easy and could be done at bedside Moderate: ICU admission, re-intubation, complication that had a documented prolonged hospital stay, medical procedure (such as flexible endoscopy), re-presentation to ED Severe: Inpatient re-admission, return to OR for any reason, mortality, failed OR.~AE were also categorize as Surgery-site related or unrelated adverse event. Finally, AE were also categorize as potentially related to steroid use (example: leukocytosis, pseudoarthrosis, or wound complications)" (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: 12 month
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Any Adverse Event? | Mild/Moderate Adverse Event? | Severe Adverse Event? | Adverse Event Related to Operated Site? | Adverse Event Unrelated to Operated Site? | Mild/Moderate Adverse Event Related to Operated Site? | Mild/Moderate Adverse Event Unrelated to Operated Site? | Severe Adverse Event Related to Operated Site? | Severe Adverse Event Unrelated to Operated Site? | Adverse Event Potentially Related to Steroid Use? | Adverse Event Unrelated to Steroid use? | Mild/Moderate Adverse Event Potentially Related to Steroid Use? | Mild/Moderate Adverse Event Unrelated to Steroid use? | Severe Adverse Event Potentially Related to Steroid Use? | Severe Adverse Event Unrelated to Steroid use? |
---|
Control | 44 | 42 | 3 | 38 | 26 | 36 | 26 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 43 | 9 | 42 | 2 | 1 |
Treatment | 47 | 46 | 3 | 38 | 30 | 37 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 42 | 15 | 41 | 1 | 2 |
[back to top]
Fusion Rate
"Flex-Ex X-rays~Bony bridging on a CT scan~Obvious bony remodeling on lateral X-ray" (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: 12 Months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Treatment | 25 |
Control | 23 |
[back to top]
Degree of Dysphagia Patients Experience (Fatigue)
SWAL-QOL survey - Fatigue domain Score ranges between 0 and 100 (worst-best) (NCT02539394)
Timeframe: Post-Op Day 1, Post-Op Day 2, Week 4-6, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Pre-operative | POD1 | POD2 | 4-6 weeks | 3 months | 6 months | 1 year |
---|
Control | 83.33 | 58.33 | 58.33 | 58.33 | 75 | 75 | 75 |
Treatment | 83.33 | 58.33 | 66.67 | 75 | 83.33 | 83.33 | 91.67 |
[back to top]
Subjective Symptom Composite Scoring
"A subjective symptom score will be extracted from the patient's score (on a scale of 0-5, where 0 defines no problems with the given symptom and 5 defines maximal problems ) on the SNOT-22 for each fo the following symptoms: blockage/congestion, runny nose, post-nasal discharge, facial pain/pressure, and sense of taste/smell. Range of 0 to 25, with higher score reflecting worse symptoms." (NCT02569437)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | 12 weeks |
---|
Doxycycline | 16.3 | 11.9 |
Sugar Pill | 17.1 | 13.6 |
[back to top]
Visual Analog Scale
The visual analog scale for overall symptoms will be used to define disease severity. Range of 0 to 10. As per the European Position Paper 2012, mild, moderate, and severe disease will be defined as 0 to and including 3, > 3 to and including 7, and > 7 to and including 10, respectively. (NCT02569437)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | 12 weeks |
---|
Doxycycline | 8.4 | 5.2 |
Sugar Pill | 8.1 | 4.5 |
[back to top]
Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score
"0- Absence of nasal polyps~Polyps confined to the middle meatus and not beyond the inferior border of the middle turbinate~Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate~Large polyps extending to the lower border of the inferior turbinate or medial to the middle turbinate~Large polyps extending to the lower border of the inferior turbinate or medial to the middle turbinate Nasal polyp scores. The score is determined for each nostril, and the two scores added for a total nasal polyp score. Range of 0 to 8, graded on a size system from 0 to 4 and summed from the right and left nostrils." (NCT02569437)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | 12 weeks |
---|
Doxycycline | 6.0 | 4.3 |
Sugar Pill | 6.5 | 4.9 |
[back to top]
Middle Meatus Culture
Culture swab for the presence or absence of microbial growth (NCT02569437)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Culture growth at initial visit and 12 week visit | Culture growth initial visit, none at 12 weeks | No growth initial visit, but growth at 12 weeks |
---|
Doxycycline | 5 | 1 | 2 |
Sugar Pill | 2 | 2 | 1 |
[back to top]
Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 22)
a validated 22 item quality of life questionnaire for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Range of 0 to 110, higher scores indicate worse outcome (NCT02569437)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | 12 weeks |
---|
Doxycycline | 55.2 | 43.7 |
Sugar Pill | 54.4 | 49.8 |
[back to top]
Pain Scale Score
Pain was measured by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) marked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) at rest and with activity. It was collected at baseline (pre-injection), immediately post-injection on the day of surgery, and at 2 weeks and 3 months. (NCT02576249)
Timeframe: Pre-injection, immediately post-injection, 2 weeks, 3 months
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Pre-injection Activity | Pre-injection Rest | Immediately Post-injection Activity | Immediately Post-injection Rest | 2 Weeks Activity | 2 Weeks Rest | 3 Months Activity | 3 Months Rest |
---|
Ropivacaine and Methylprednisolone | 6.4 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 3.9 | 2.6 |
Saline and Methylprednisolone | 5.8 | 4 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 2.8 |
[back to top]
Tegner Activity Level Scale
"The Tegner activity level scale is a scale that aims to provide a standardized method of grading work and sporting activities. The Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The patient is asked to select the level of participation that best describes their current level of activity and that before injury.~A score of 0 represents sick leave or disability pension because of knee problems, whereas a score of 10 corresponds to participation in national and international elite competitive sports. A score >6 can only be achieved if the person participates in recreational or competitive sport." (NCT02576249)
Timeframe: baseline (pre-injection), 2 weeks, 3 months
,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| baseline (pre-injection) | 2 weeks | 3 months |
---|
Ropivacaine and Methylprednisolone | 3.5 | 4.3 | 3.5 |
Saline and Methylprednisolone | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3 |
[back to top]
The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale
The KOOS holds 42 items in five separately scored subscales: Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems. (NCT02576249)
Timeframe: 3 months after the injection
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Ropivacaine and Methylprednisolone | 63.1 |
Saline and Methylprednisolone | 67.2 |
[back to top]
Palmar Pain Score
Score for pain in the proximal palm and related activity limitations, range 0 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT02652390)
Timeframe: 5-7 years
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone 80 mg | 86.4 |
Methylprednisolone 40 mg | 84.6 |
Placebo | 83.0 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients Who Have Had Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery on the Study Hand
Number of patients who have had carpal tunnel release surgery on the study hand. (NCT02652390)
Timeframe: 5 to 7 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone 80 mg | 31 |
Methylprednisolone 40 mg | 34 |
Placebo | 36 |
[back to top]
Bodily Pain Score
Score for the 2-item bodily pain scale, range 0 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT02652390)
Timeframe: 5-7 years
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone 80 mg | 81.4 |
Methylprednisolone 40 mg | 79.9 |
Placebo | 78.2 |
[back to top]
11-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score
Score for the 11-item DASH scale, a measure of activity limitations related to the upper extremity. Score range 0 (best) to 100 (worst) (NCT02652390)
Timeframe: 5-7 years
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone 80 mg | 13.1 |
Methylprednisolone 40 mg | 16.9 |
Placebo | 19.3 |
[back to top]
Symptom Severity Score
Change in symptom severity score from baseline to 5 to 7 years. Score range 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (most severe symptoms). (NCT02652390)
Timeframe: 5-7 years
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
80-mg Mrthylprednisolone and no Surgery | 1.34 |
Surgery After Methylprednisolone or Placebo | 1.53 |
[back to top]
Satisfaction Score
Visual analog scale about treatment satisfaction, score 0 (worst) to 100 (best). (NCT02652390)
Timeframe: 5-7 years
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone 80 mg | 77.5 |
Methylprednisolone 40 mg | 71.4 |
Placebo | 68.4 |
[back to top]
Core Body Temperature in Degrees Celcius.
Results are provided for core body temperature averaged over the following time intervals after ROSC: 1) 0-6 hours; 2) 6-12 hours; 3) 12-18 hours; 4) 18-24 hours; 5) 24-30 hours; 6) 30-36 hours; 7) 36-42 hours; and 42-48 hours. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: Hourly from intensive care admission to 48 hours postresuscitation.
,
Intervention | Degrees Celcius (Mean) |
---|
| Temperature averaged over 0-6 hours after ROSC | Temperature averaged over 6-12 hours after ROSC | Temperature averaged over 12-18 hours after ROSC | Temperature averaged over 18-24 hours after ROSC | Temperature averaged over 24-30 hours after ROSC | Temperature averaged over 30-36 hours after ROSC | Temperature averaged over 36-42 hours after ROSC | Temperature averaged over 42-48 hours after ROSC |
---|
Control Group | 35.6 | 36.6 | 36.5 | 36.3 | 36.2 | 36.2 | 36.2 | 36.3 |
Steroids Group | 36.5 | 36.3 | 36.0 | 36.1 | 36.1 | 36.0 | 36.1 | 36.2 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (%) Measured in Blood Samples Obtained Through a Central Venous Catheter Port.
Results on postresuscitation central venous oxygen saturation (%) are provided for the third, pre-specified time point of measurement, i.e., at 24 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 24 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | Percent Hemoglobin Concentration (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 71.1 |
Control Group | 70.1 |
[back to top]
Organ Failure-free Days.
Number of organ failure-free days during days 1 through 60 postrandomization. Organ failure free=corresponding Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Subscore <3; each subscore can have the following values: 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4; increasing values indicate worsening organ failure. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Days 1 to 60 postrandomization.
Intervention | Number of Days without Organ Failure (Median) |
---|
Steroids Group | 0 |
Control Group | 0 |
[back to top]
Survival to Hospital Discharge With Favorable Functional Outcome.
Survival to hospital discharge with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) Score of 1 or 2. The CPC Score ranges can have the following values: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; lower Scores correspond to better outcomes, whereas higher Scores reflect worsening outcomes, e.g. a Score of 4 means Coma or Vegetative state, and a Score of 5 means Brain Death. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Up to 180 days postrandomization.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Steroids Group | 2 |
Control Group | 5 |
[back to top]
Cerebral Blood Flow Index by Near Infrared Spectroscopy With Indocyanine Green.
Results are reported for 2 pairs of cerebral blood flow index (CBFI) measurements performed each time at a lower and a higher level of mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the following time points: 1) at 4 hours after ROSC and 2) at 72 hours after ROSC (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 4 and 72 hours postresuscitation.
,
Intervention | nM/s (Mean) |
---|
| CBFI 4 HOURS POST-ROSC MEAN MAP=75.5 MMHG | CBFI 4 HOURS POST-ROSC MEAN MAP=96.0 MMHG | CBFI 72 HOURS POST-ROSC MEAN MAP=75.5 MMHG | CBFI 72 HOURS POST-ROSC MEAN MAP= 97.0 MMHG |
---|
Control Group | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.8 |
Steroids Group | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.9 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Inflammatory Response as Assessed by Serum Cytokine Levels (pg/mL).
Logarithm (base 10)-transformed serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa), interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10; blood samples were obtained by venipuncture. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 4, 24, 48, and 72 hours postresuscitation.
,
Intervention | Log(10) transformed values of pg/mL (Mean) |
---|
| IL-6 at 4 hours after ROSC | TNFα at 4 hours after ROSC | IL-1β at 4 hours after ROSC | IL-8 at 4 hours after ROSC | IL-10 at 4 hours after ROSC | IL-6 at 24 hours after ROSC | TNFα at 24 hours after ROSC | IL-1β at 24 hours after ROSC | IL-8 at 24 hours after ROSC | IL-10 at 24 hours after ROSC | IL-6 at 48 hours after ROSC | TNFα at 48 hours after ROSC | IL-1β at 48 hours after ROSC | IL-8 at 48 hours after ROSC | IL-10 at 48 hours after ROSC | IL-6 at 72 hours after ROSC | TNFα at 72 hours after ROSC | IL-1β at 72 hours after ROSC | IL-8 at 72 hours after ROSC | IL-10 at 72 hours after ROSC |
---|
Control Group | 2.22 | 2.03 | 2.03 | 2.43 | 1.76 | 1.99 | 2.00 | 2.09 | 2.29 | 1.54 | 1.91 | 1.96 | 2.03 | 2.17 | 1.53 | 1.90 | 1.96 | 2.04 | 2.19 | 1.45 |
Steroids Group | 2.19 | 1.97 | 2.07 | 2.39 | 1.76 | 2.06 | 2.02 | 2.06 | 2.27 | 1.69 | 1.87 | 1.99 | 2.09 | 2.15 | 1.56 | 1.93 | 2.00 | 2.05 | 2.15 | 1.66 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Cardiac Output (L/Min) Measured by Either Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) or a Continuous Cardiac Output (CCO) Thermodilution Pulmonary Artery Catheter.
Results are provided for CO at 72 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 72 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | L/min (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 5.8 |
Control Group | 5.6 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (%) Measured in Blood Samples Obtained Through a Central Venous Catheter Port.
Results on postresuscitation central venous oxygen saturation (%) are provided for the fourth, pre-specified time point of measurement, i.e., at 48 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 48 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | Percent Hemoglobin Concentration (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 73.3 |
Control Group | 70.5 |
[back to top]
Left and Right Ventricular Diastolic Area (cm^2) by Echocardiography.
Results are provided on left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA) and right ventricular diastolic area (RVEDA) by echocardiography within 12 hours and 72 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: Within the first 12 hours and at 72 hours postresuscitation.
,
Intervention | cm^2 (Mean) |
---|
| LVEDA within 12 hours after ROSC | RVEDA within 12 hours after ROSC | LVEDA at 72 hours after ROSC | RVEDA at 72 hours after ROSC |
---|
Control Group | 22.8 | 13.0 | 18.5 | 12.6 |
Steroids Group | 23.1 | 12.1 | 23.1 | 14.5 |
[back to top]
Left and Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction (%) by Echocardiography.
Results are provided on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) within 12 hours and 72 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: Within the first 12 hours and at 72 hours postresuscitation.
,
Intervention | Percentage (Mean) |
---|
| LVEF within 12 hours after ROSC | RVEF within 12 hours after ROSC | LVEF at 72 hours after ROSC | RVEF at 72 hours after ROSC |
---|
Control Group | 45.9 | 42.7 | 50 | 44.7 |
Steroids Group | 42.3 | 41.7 | 45 | 42.8 |
[back to top]
Steroid-associated Complications.
Episodes of 1) Hyperglycemia (defined as Blood Glucose >200 mg/dL), 2) Hypernatremia (defined as blood gas analysis-derived sodium ion concentration >150 mEq/L), and 3) Infections (defined as any microbiologically documented, intensive care unit-acquired, or hospital-acquired infection). (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Up to 180 days postrandomization.
,
Intervention | Number of Episodes per Patient (Median) |
---|
| No. of Episodes of Hyperglycemia | No. of Episodes of Hypernatremia | No. of Episodes of Infections |
---|
Control Group | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steroids Group | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring.
Results on postresuscitation, mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) are provided for the third, pre-specified time point of measurement, i.e. at 24 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 24 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 79.9 |
Control Group | 81.9 |
[back to top]
Eccentricity Index by Echocardiography.
"Eccentricity index (ECCI) is defined as the ratio of the left ventricular (LV) longitudinal (or anteroposterior) diameter to the LV transverse (or septo-lateral) diameter, measured at end diastole and end systole in a short-axis view. Pertinent results are provided for a first determination within 12 hours after ROSC and a second determination at 72 hours after ROSC." (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: Within the first 12 hours and at 72 hours postresuscitation.
,
Intervention | ECCENTRICITY INDEX (Mean) |
---|
| End-diastolic ECCI within 12 hours after ROSC | End-systolic ECCI within 12 hours after ROSC | End-diastolic ECCI at 72 hours after ROSC | End-systolic ECCI at 72 hours after ROSC |
---|
Control Group | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Steroids Group | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Cardiac Output (L/Min) Measured by Either Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) or a Continuous Cardiac Output (CCO) Thermodilution Pulmonary Artery Catheter.
Results are provided for CO at 24 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 24 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | L/min (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 5.6 |
Control Group | 5.4 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (%) Measured in Blood Samples Obtained Through a Central Venous Catheter Port.
Results on postresuscitation central venous oxygen saturation (%) are provided for the fifth, pre-specified time point of measurement, i.e., at 72 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 72 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | Percent Hemoglobin Saturation (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 72.5 |
Control Group | 70.4 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (%) Measured in Blood Samples Obtained Through a Central Venous Catheter Port (as Feasible).
Results on postresuscitation central venous oxygen saturation (%) are provided for the second, pre-specified time point of measurement, i.e., at 4 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 4 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | Percent Hemoglobin Concentration (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 67.4 |
Control Group | 56.8 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Cardiac Output (L/Min) Measured by Either Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) or a Continuous Cardiac Output (CCO) Thermodilution Pulmonary Artery Catheter.
Results are provided for CO at 48 hours after ROSC (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 48 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | L/min (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 5.8 |
Control Group | 5.7 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring (as Feasible).
Results on early postresuscitation, mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) are provided for the first, pre-specified time point of measurement, i.e. at 20 min after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time point of measurement: 20 min after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 78.4 |
Control Group | 75.1 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Cardiac Output (L/Min) Measured by Either Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output (PiCCO) or a Continuous Cardiac Output (CCO) Thermodilution Pulmonary Artery Catheter.
RESULTS ARE PROVIDED FOR CARDIAC OUTPUT (CO) AT 4 HOURS AFTER ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 4 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | L/min (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 4.9 |
Control Group | 5.0 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring.
Results on postresuscitation, mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) are provided for the fourth, pre-specified time point of measurement, i.e. at 48 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 48 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 80.2 |
Control Group | 84.2 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring.
Results on postresuscitation, mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) are provided for the fifth, pre-specified time point of measurement, i.e. at 72 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 72 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 85.2 |
Control Group | 84.7 |
[back to top]
Early Postresuscitation Arterial Blood Pressure (mmHg) Measured Through Institution of Invasive Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring (as Feasible).
Results on early postresuscitation, mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) are provided for the second, pre-specified time point of measurement, i.e. at 4 hours after ROSC. (NCT02790788)
Timeframe: Time points of measurement: 4 hours after ROSC.
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|
Steroids Group | 83.9 |
Control Group | 78.9 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Sampled for RNA-seq Differential Expression Analysis (Biological Replicates)
Number of participants (biological replicates) that were successfully sampled for RNA-seq differential gene expression analysis in glucocorticoid-treated immune cells. The analysis employed a cutoff value of < 5% false-discovery rate (FDR) to select the transcripts that were considered differentially expressed at each time point. The resulting gene lists were contrasted to determine which genes were uniquely differentially expressed in different cell types. (NCT02798523)
Timeframe: Up to 2 or 4 hours post infusion depending on group
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Up to 2 Hours Post Infusion | 5 |
Up to 4 Hours Post Infusion | 20 |
[back to top]
Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to Second Course of Azacitidine
Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 1 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)
Intervention | Percentage of CpG methylation (Mean) |
---|
KMT2A-Rearranged | 76.5 |
[back to top]
Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of First Course of Azacitidine
Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 5 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)
Intervention | Percentage of CpG methylation (Mean) |
---|
KMT2A-Rearranged | 75.54 |
[back to top]
Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 5 of Second Course of Azacitidine
Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients after the second course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 13, Day 5 (Following induction phase (5 weeks), the first course of Azacitidine (1 week), and consolidation (6 weeks), the second course of Azacitidine began around Week 13 of therapy)
Intervention | Percentage of CpG methylation (Mean) |
---|
KMT2A-Rearranged | 74.52 |
[back to top]
Tolerability of Azacitidine in Combination With Interfant-06 Standard Chemotherapy in Evaluable Infant Patients With Newly Diagnosed ALL With KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R). KMT2A Gene Rearrangement (KMT2A-R)
Proportion of KMT2A-Rearranged patients treated with azacitidine with Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) from the first course of azacitidine administration up to fourth course of azacitidine administration. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
KMT2A-Rearranged | 6.45 |
[back to top]
Biologic Activity, Defined as Global Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Methylation Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)s; Day 1 Prior to First Course of Azacitidine
Will calculate the percentage of CpG site methylation for all patients before the first course of azacitidine. Mean and standard deviation will be reported. (NCT02828358)
Timeframe: Week 6, Day 1 (Following the induction phase (35 days), the first course of Azacitidine began around Week 6 of therapy)
Intervention | Percentage of CpG methylation (Mean) |
---|
KMT2A-Rearranged | 78.17 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Sustained Headache Freedom
Sustained headache freedom is defined as achieving a headache intensity = none within two hours of treatment and maintaining this level, without requiring additional headache medication, for 7 days following discharge from the Emergency Department. Participants will be asked by phone how number of days they experienced headaches during the week after discharge from the emergency department. Reported values are participants who experienced no headaches at all during the 7 days immediately following discharge. (NCT02847494)
Timeframe: 7 days after discharge from emergency department
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Control | 10 |
Experimental | 6 |
[back to top]
Headache Days as Self-reported by Participants
At the seven day follow-up, participants will be asked by phone how many days they experienced headaches since being discharged. (NCT02847494)
Timeframe: 7 days after discharge from emergency department
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|
Control | 3.0 |
Experimental | 3.3 |
[back to top]
Medication Preference as Assessed by Self-report
"Participants will be asked, by phone, if they would want the same medication during a subsequent visit to the emergency department. Reported values indicate participants who responded yes." (NCT02847494)
Timeframe: 7 days after discharge from emergency department
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Control | 76 |
Experimental | 75 |
[back to top]
Nonrelapse Mortality (NRM)
Defined as the proportion of subjects who died due to causes other than malignancy relapse. (NCT02953678)
Timeframe: From baseline to Months 6, 9, 12, and 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| 6 months | 9 months | 12 months | 24 months |
---|
Ruxolitinib in Combination With Corticosteroids | 44.4 | 48.2 | 52.9 | 64.8 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Relapse Rate
Defined as the percentage of participants whose underlying malignancy relapsed. (NCT02953678)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 24 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Ruxolitinib in Combination With Corticosteroids | 7.0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Three-month DOR
Defined as the time from first response until GVHD progression or death. DOR was assessed when all participants who were on the study completed the Day 84 visit. (NCT02953678)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to 3 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Ruxolitinib in Combination With Corticosteroids | 84.5 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Six-month Duration of Response (DOR)
Defined as the time from first response until graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) progression or death. DOR was assessed when all participants who were on the study completed the Day 180 visit. (NCT02953678)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to 6 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Ruxolitinib in Combination With Corticosteroids | 68.2 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS)
Defined as the time from study enrollment (first day of ruxolitinib treatment) to death due to any cause. (NCT02953678)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 24 months)
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|
Ruxolitinib in Combination With Corticosteroids | 232.0 |
[back to top]
Failure-free Survival (FFS)
Defined as the time from first dose of ruxolitinib to the earliest date that a participant died, had a relapse/progression of the underlying malignancy, required additional therapy for aGVHD, or demonstrated signs or symptoms of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). (NCT02953678)
Timeframe: From Baseline until death, withdrawal of consent, or the end of the study, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 24 months)
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|
Ruxolitinib in Combination With Corticosteroids | 85.0 |
[back to top]
Overall Response Rate (ORR) at Day 28
Defined as the percentage of participants demonstrating a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR). (NCT02953678)
Timeframe: From baseline to Day 28
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Responders - CR | Responders - VGPR | Responders - PR |
---|
Ruxolitinib in Combination With Corticosteroids | 19 | 7 | 13 |
[back to top]
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Defined as the percentage of participants demonstrating a CR, VGPR, or PR. (NCT02953678)
Timeframe: From baseline to days 14, 56, and 100
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 14 | Day 56 | Day 100 |
---|
Ruxolitinib in Combination With Corticosteroids | 62.0 | 36.6 | 32.4 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAES), Serious TEAEs, And Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs
AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with use of medical treatment or procedure that may or may not be considered related to the medical treatment or procedure. Serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization. TEAE was an AE that was reported for the first time, or worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study drug (until 30 days after the last dose of study drug). Severity of AEs was described and graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE version 4.03). Grade 3 and above would constitute a severe, life-threatening, or death event. (NCT02953678)
Timeframe: From signing the informed consent form up to 30-35 days after the last dose of study treatment (up to 24 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| TEAEs | Serious TEAEs | Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs |
---|
Ruxolitinib in Combination With Corticosteroids | 71 | 59 | 69 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Incidence of Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GvHD)
Incidence of chronic GvHD at Days 180 and 365 was reported. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Days 180 and 365
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 180 | Day 365 |
---|
GLASSIA | 0 | 0 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS) - Percentage of Participants With an Event
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Days 100, 180 and 365
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 100 | Day 180 | Day 365 |
---|
GLASSIA | NA | NA | NA |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Acute Graft-versus-host Disease (GvHD) Grading at Days 28, 56 and 180
Grading of GvHD was performed by the investigator according to the modified International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) grading system which classifies the degree of involvement of each organ system by stage on a scale of 0 to 4. The degree of skin involvement was staged depending upon degree and severity of the lesions: Stage 1: Maculopapular rash over less than (<) 25% of body area, Stage 2: Maculopapular rash over 25 to 50% of body area, Stage 3: Generalized erythroderma, Stage 4: Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation. Degree of GI involvement was staged based on severity of diarrhoea: Stage 1: 500 to 1000 mL/day,Stage 2: 1000 to 1500 mL/day, Stage 3: 1500 to 2000 mL/day, Stage 4: greater than (>) 2000 mL/day OR pain OR ileus. Degree of liver involvement was staged based upon serum total bilirubin level as follows: Stage 1: 2 to 3 mg/dL, Stage 2: 3 to 6 mg/dL, Stage 3: 6 to 15 mg/dL, Stage 4: >15 mg/dL. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Days 28, 56 and 180
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Day 28: Degree of skin Involvement72260019 | Day 28: Degree of GI Involvement72260019 | Day 28: Degree of liver Involvement72260019 | Day 56: Degree of skin Involvement72260019 | Day 56: Degree of GI Involvement72260019 | Day 56: Degree of liver Involvement72260019 | Day 180: Degree of skin Involvement72260019 | Day 180: Degree of GI Involvement72260019 | Day 180: Degree of liver Involvement72260019 |
---|
| Stage 1 | Stage 3 | Stage 4 | Stage 0 | Stage 2 |
---|
GLASSIA | 1 |
GLASSIA | 0 |
[back to top]
Failure-free Survival - Percentage of Participants With an Event
Failure-free survival was defined as the absence of all of the following criteria: Need for second-line treatment for acute GvHD, Non-relapse mortality (death during continuous complete remission) and recurrent malignancy. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Days 100 and 180
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 100 | Day 180 |
---|
GLASSIA | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
All-cause Mortality - Percentage of Participants With an Event
All-cause mortality was defined as the time from HSCT to death due to any cause. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Days 28, 56, 100 and 180
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 28 | Day 56 | Day 100 | Day180 |
---|
GLASSIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[back to top]
Graft-versus-host Disease (GvHD)-Free Survival - Percentage of Participants With an Event
GVHD-free survival was defined as being alive without previous onset of acute GVHD or chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppressive therapy. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Days 28, 56, 100, 180 and 365
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 28 | Day 56 | Day 100 | Day 180 | Day 365 |
---|
GLASSIA | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
[back to top]
Systemic Clearance at Steady State (CLss) of GLASSIA
CLss of GLASSIA was reported. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Day 1: through 48 hours, Day 13: through 48 hours, Day 22 and Day 50: through approximately 168 hours
Intervention | Deciliters per hour (dL/h) (Number) |
---|
GLASSIA: Day 13: 30 mg/kg | 0.297 |
GLASSIA: Day 22: 120 mg/kg | 0.286 |
GLASSIA: Day 50: 120 mg/kg | 0.260 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Achieving Overall Response at Day 56
Overall response was defined as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) complete response (CR) + partial response (PR), defined as: - GvHD CR was complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of acute GvHD in all organs without intervening salvage - GvHD PR was improvement of 1 stage in 1 or more organs involved in GvHD without progression in other organs. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Day 56
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
GLASSIA | 100 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Achieving Overall Response (OR) At Day 28
OR was defined as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) complete response (CR) + partial response (PR), defined as: - GvHD CR was complete resolution of all signs and symptoms of acute GvHD in all organs without intervening salvage and GvHD PR was improvement of 1 stage in 1 or more organs involved in GvHD without progression in other organs. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Day 28
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
GLASSIA | 100 |
[back to top]
"Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve From Time Zero to Time t AUC(0-t) of GLASSIA"
AUC(0-t) of GLASSIA was reported. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Day 1: through 48 hours, Day 13: through 48 hours, Day 22 and Day 50: through approximately 168 hours
Intervention | h*mg/dL (Number) |
---|
GLASSIA: Day 1: 90 mg/kg | 16300 |
GLASSIA: Day 13: 30 mg/kg | 11000 |
GLASSIA: Day 22: 120 mg/kg | 40400 |
GLASSIA: Day 50: 120 mg/kg | 33400 |
[back to top]
Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of GLASSIA
Apparent terminal half-life (hour), determined as ln2/lambda-z. lambda-z is the apparent terminal rate constant (one per hour), determined by linear regression of the terminal points of the log-linear concentration-time curve. Visual assessment will be used to identify the terminal linear phase of the concentration-time profile. A minimum of 3 data points will be used for determination. t1/2 of GLASSIA was reported. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Day 1: through 48 hours, Day 13: through 48 hours, Day 22 and Day 50: through approximately 168 hours
Intervention | Hour (h) (Number) |
---|
GLASSIA: Day 1: 90 mg/kg | 152 |
GLASSIA: Day 13: 30 mg/kg | 117 |
GLASSIA: Day 22: 120 mg/kg | 317 |
GLASSIA: Day 50: 120 mg/kg | 247 |
[back to top]
Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of GLASSIA
Vss of GLASSIA was reported. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Day 1: through 48 hours, Day 13: through 48 hours, Day 22 and Day 50: through approximately 168 hours
Intervention | Deciliter (dL) (Number) |
---|
GLASSIA: Day 13: 30 mg/kg | 50.9 |
GLASSIA: Day 22: 120 mg/kg | 123 |
GLASSIA: Day 50: 120 mg/kg | 91.1 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Recurrence of Primary Malignancies
Incidence of recurrence of primary malignancies was reported. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 365
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
GLASSIA | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
Vital signs included body temperature, respiratory rate, pulse rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 56
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
GLASSIA | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Assessments
Clinical laboratory assessments such as hematology, clinical chemistry, lipid and coagulation panels and urinalysis were performed. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Day 56
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
GLASSIA | 0 |
[back to top]
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of GLASSIA
Cmax of GLASSIA was reported. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Day 1: through 48 hours, Day 13: through 48 hours, Day 22 and Day 50: through approximately 168 hours
Intervention | Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) (Number) |
---|
GLASSIA: Day 1: 90 mg/kg | 339 |
GLASSIA: Day 13: 30 mg/kg | 262 |
GLASSIA: Day 22: 120 mg/kg | 390 |
GLASSIA: Day 50: 120 mg/kg | 409 |
[back to top]
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC0-inf) From Time Zero to Infinity
AUC of GLASSIA was reported. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Day 1: through 48 hours; Day 13: through 48 hours; Day 22 and Day 50: through approximately 168 hours
Intervention | Hour*milligrams per deciliter (h*mg/dL) (Number) |
---|
GLASSIA: Day 1: 90 mg/kg | 61500 |
GLASSIA: Day 13: 30 mg/kg | 43500 |
GLASSIA: Day 22: 120 mg/kg | 126000 |
GLASSIA: Day 50: 120 mg/kg | 117000 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants Achieving Gastrointestinal (GI) Response at Day 28
GI response was defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR), defined as: - GI CR was able to eat; not requiring parenteral nutrition, and passing primarily formed stools - GI PR was decrease in need for parenteral nutrition to less than or equal to (<=) 50% of required calories; and reduction of stool volume by greater than or equal to (>=) 50%, without ileus. (NCT02956122)
Timeframe: Day 28
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
GLASSIA | 100 |
[back to top]
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events
Adverse events (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: one year
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa | 8 |
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga | 9 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Subjects With Prostate Specific Antigen - 50 Response
A decrease of ≥50% reduction from baseline of the study CHL-AA-201 (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: 360 days
Intervention | percentage of number of subjects (Number) |
---|
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa | 60.0 |
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga | 55.6 |
[back to top]
Proportion of Subjects With Disease Progression
Number of participants who had disease progression (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: one year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa | 1 |
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga | 3 |
[back to top]
Prostate Specific Antigen Levels
Change in serum testosterone levels after one year of treatment against baseline (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: One year
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa | -60.12 |
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga | -112.76 |
[back to top]
Testosterone Complete Suppression
Proportion of subjects with complete suppression of testosterone levels (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: 360 days
Intervention | percentage of subjects (Number) |
---|
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa | 100 |
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga | 87.5 |
[back to top]
Testosterone Levels
Change in serum testosterone levels from baseline (NCT02962284)
Timeframe: Baseline and 360 days
Intervention | ng/dL (Mean) |
---|
Preceding Treatment - Yonsa | -6.24 |
Preceding Treatment - Zytiga | -5.87 |
[back to top]
Uncorrected Visual Acuity
Best uncorrected visual acuity will be measured at 3 months (NCT03123614)
Timeframe: 3 months
Intervention | logMAR (Mean) |
---|
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel | -0.078 |
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp | -0.075 |
[back to top]
Number of Eyes With Corneal Haze
As determined by slit lamp examination (NCT03123614)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | Eyes (Count of Units) |
---|
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel | 3 |
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp | 7 |
[back to top]
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3
Intraocular pressure will be measured by applanation tonometry (NCT03123614)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 week post-op, 1 month post-op, 2 months post-op, 3 months post-op
,
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) | IOP 1 week postop | IOP 1 month postop | IOP 2 months postop | IOP 3 months postop |
---|
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel | 14.38 | 13.67 | 14.15 | 13.36 | 13.15 |
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp | 14.30 | 13.28 | 14.60 | 13.16 | 12.22 |
[back to top]
Best Corrected Visual Acuity at 3 Months
Best uncorrected visual acuity will be measured at 3 months (NCT03123614)
Timeframe: 3 months
Intervention | logMAR (Mean) |
---|
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel | -0.120 |
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp | -0.114 |
[back to top]
Proportion of Subjects Who Discontinue Immunosuppressive Medications
Summary statistics of subjects discontinuing immunosuppressive medications will be calculated (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Days 56 and 100
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 56 | Day 100 |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 12 | 11 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 10 | 8 |
[back to top]
Cmax of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids
Defined as maximum observed plasma concentration. (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Protocol-defined timepoints up to Day 28
Intervention | nM (Mean) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 796 |
[back to top]
AUC of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids
Defined as area under the concentration-time curve. (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Protocol-defined timepoints up to Day 28
Intervention | nM*h (Mean) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 6720 |
[back to top]
CL/F of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids
Defined as oral dose clearance. (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Protocol-defined timepoints up to Day 28
Intervention | L/h (Mean) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 104 |
[back to top]
Cmin of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids
Defined as minimum observed plasma concentration. (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Protocol-defined timepoints up to Day 28
Intervention | nM (Mean) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 72.5 |
[back to top]
Duration of Response
Defined as the interval from first response until GVHD progression or death. (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Baseline through 30-35 days after end of treatment, total particpation expected to average 24 months
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 587 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | NA |
[back to top]
Failure-free Survival
Defined as the proportion of subjects who are still alive, have not relapsed, have not required additional therapy for aGVHD, and have not demonstrated signs or symptoms of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: 6 months from randomization
Intervention | proportion of participants (Number) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 44.29 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 40.00 |
[back to top]
Incidence Rate of aGVHD Flares
(NCT03139604)
Timeframe: up to day 100
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 42 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 48 |
[back to top]
Incidence Rate of Secondary Graft Failure
Defined as > 95% recipient cells any time after engraftment with no signs of relapse, OR retransplantation because of secondary neutropenia (< 0.5 × 109/L) and/or thrombocytopenia (< 20 × 109/L) within 2 months of transplantion (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Randomization through end of Study, study duration expected to average 24 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 2 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 0 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events With INCB39110
Adverse events reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study treatment (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: 30-35 days after end of treatment, approximately 24 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 208 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 214 |
[back to top]
Overall Response Rate Based on Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Response Index
Defined as the percentage of participants demonstrating a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR). (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Day 28
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 74.0 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 66.4 |
[back to top]
Overall Survival (OS)
Defined as the interval from study enrollment to death due to any cause. (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: End of Study up to approximately 24 months
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 365 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 348.5 |
[back to top]
Relapse Rate of Malignant and Nonmalignant Hematologic Disease
Defined as the proportion of subjects whose underlying hematologic disease relapses (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Randomization through end of Study, study duration expected to average 24 months
Intervention | percentage (Number) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 12.4 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 11.4 |
[back to top]
Time to Response
Defined as the interval from treatment initiation to first response (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: End of Study, total particpation expected to average 24 months
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 9.9 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 10.1 |
[back to top]
Tmax of Itacitinib When Administered in Combination With Corticosteroids
Defined as time to maximum plasma concentration. (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Protocol-defined timepoints up to Day 28
Intervention | hrs (Median) |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 2.1 |
[back to top]
Incidence Rate of cGVHD
(NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Days 180 and 365
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 180 | Day 365 |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 25 | 43 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 36 | 58 |
[back to top]
Nonrelapse Mortality
Defined as the percentage of participants who died due to causes other than malignancy relapse. (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Month 6,9,12 and 24
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| 6 Months | 9 Months | 12 Months | 24 Months |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 36 | 46 | 51 | 56 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 37 | 45 | 52 | 52 |
[back to top]
Objective Response Rate
(NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Days 14, 56 and 100
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 14 | Day 56 | Day 100 |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 170 | 138 | 92 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 160 | 124 | 96 |
[back to top]
Proportion of Subjects Who Discontinue Corticosteroids
Average and cumulative corticosteroid dose usage will be calculated and proportion of subjects discontinuing corticosteroids will be tabulated (NCT03139604)
Timeframe: Days 28, 56, 100, and 180
,
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|
| Day 28 | Day 56 | Day 100 | Day 180 |
---|
Itacitinib Plus Corticosteroids | 3 | 16 | 39 | 39 |
Placebo Plus Corticosteroids | 3 | 11 | 45 | 45 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Mortality, Including In-hospital Mortality or Mortality After Hospital Discharge But Within 30 Days of the Last Dose of Study Drug
(NCT03229538)
Timeframe: up to 30 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Arm | 12 |
Placebo Arm | 17 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Death or Major Complication as Defined by an Outcome in One of the 7 Highest Global Ranking Categories
The 7 highest global ranking categories range from 91 (postoperative length of hospital stay > 90 days) to 97 (operative mortality). (NCT03229538)
Timeframe: Until hospital discharge, up to 4 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Arm | 103 |
Placebo Arm | 122 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Any Other Post-operative Complications From the Start of Study Drug Administration Until Hospital Discharge.
(NCT03229538)
Timeframe: Until hospital discharge, up to 4 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Arm | 237 |
Placebo Arm | 264 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With a Post-operative Length of Stay Greater Than 90 Days
Calculated as discharge date minus surgery date. (NCT03229538)
Timeframe: Until hospital discharge, up to 4 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Arm | 18 |
Placebo Arm | 29 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation (Greater Than 7 Days)
(NCT03229538)
Timeframe: Until hospital discharge, up to 4 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Arm | 41 |
Placebo Arm | 51 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Post-operative Low Cardiac Output Syndrome
"Based upon the STS-CHSD registry defined cardiac dysfunction resulting in low cardiac output complication variable." (NCT03229538)
Timeframe: Until hospital discharge, up to 4 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Arm | 31 |
Placebo Arm | 37 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Occurrence of Any One or More of the Following STS-CHSD-defined Major Post-operative Infectious Complications: Postprocedural Infective Endocarditis, Pneumonia, Sepsis, Deep Wound Infection, Mediastinitis.
(NCT03229538)
Timeframe: Until hospital discharge, up to 4 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Arm | 31 |
Placebo Arm | 24 |
[back to top]
Visual Analog Scale Scores at Each Time Point.
VAS (Visual Analog Scale) pain score improvement > 1.4 points (The number that the respondent indicates on the scale to rate their pain intensity is recorded. Scores range from 0=no pain and 10=worst pain). The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between 0=no pain and 10=worst pain. (NCT03232749)
Timeframe: Baseline, post-injection (5-10 minutes), 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline VAS score | Post-injection VAS score | 2 Weeks VAS score | 1 Month VAS score | 2 Month VAS score | 3 Month VAS score | 6 Month VAS score |
---|
Symptomatic Primary Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder | 4.54 | 1.86 | 1.18 | 2.05 | 2.56 | 2.50 | 2.44 |
[back to top]
ASES Scores at Each Time Point
ASES (American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeon) score. Data points a change for all pre-specified time points and is reported. ASES has 11 items scored by Pain VAS (1 question) Function (10 questions); Score: 0-100 (Higher score is better). (NCT03232749)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline ASES score | 2 Week ASES score | 1 Month ASES scrore | 2 Month ASES score | 3 Month ASES score | 6 Month ASES score |
---|
Symptomatic Primary Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder | 48.52 | 79.72 | 73.86 | 28.60 | 71.78 | 61.48 |
[back to top]
SST (Simple Shoulder Test) Scores at Each Time Point
SST (Simple Shoulder Test) score improvement > 2.4 points. 12 items that are answered yes/no (measures functional limitations of the affected shoulder): Scored: 0-12 (Higher score is better) (NCT03232749)
Timeframe: Baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline SST Score | 2 Week SST Score | 1 Month SST Score | 2 Month SST Score | 3 Month SST Score | 6 Month SST Score |
---|
Symptomatic Primary Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder | 5.29 | 8.40 | 7.32 | 5.92 | 6.73 | 7.00 |
[back to top]
Conjunctival Redness at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post CAC on Day 15
"Conjunctival Redness was assessed by a trained investigator post-conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) on a 0 to 4 scale (0=none (best/no redness) to 4=severe (worst/most redness)).~The conjunctival redness was averaged across all subjects at each time point." (NCT03320434)
Timeframe: post CAC exposure at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC on Day 15.
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 7 minutes post-CAC | 15 minutes post-CAC | 20 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Patanol | 1.242 | 1.617 | 1.592 |
PRT-2761 0.5% | 1.723 | 1.920 | 1.857 |
PRT-2761 0% | 1.973 | 1.991 | 2.036 |
PRT-2761 1% | 2.056 | 2.176 | 2.222 |
[back to top]
Conjunctival Redness at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post CAC on Day 1
"Conjunctival Redness was assessed by a trained investigator post-conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) on a 0 to 4 scale (0=none (best/no redness) to 4=severe (worst/most redness)).~The conjunctival redness was averaged across all subjects at each time point." (NCT03320434)
Timeframe: post CAC exposure at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post-CAC on Day 1.
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 7 minutes post-CAC | 15 minutes post-CAC | 20 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Patanol | 1.592 | 1.833 | 1.917 |
PRT-2761 0.5% | 1.282 | 1.411 | 1.371 |
PRT-2761 0% | 1.957 | 2.181 | 2.164 |
PRT-2761 1% | 1.491 | 1.526 | 1.603 |
[back to top]
Ocular Itching at 5, 7, and 10 Minutes Post CAC on Day 15
Ocular Itching was assessed by the subjects using a 0 to 4 point scale(0=none (best/no itching) to 4=severe (worst/most itching)). The ocular itching was averaged across all subjects at each time point. (NCT03320434)
Timeframe: post CAC exposure at 5, 7, and 10 minutes post CAC on Day 15
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 5 minutes post-CAC | 7 minutes post-CAC | 10 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Patanol | 0.775 | 0.808 | 0.833 |
PRT-2761 0.5% | 2.431 | 2.362 | 1.922 |
PRT-2761 0% | 2.527 | 2.366 | 1.929 |
PRT-2761 1% | 2.611 | 2.602 | 2.204 |
[back to top]
Ocular Itching at 5, 7, and 10 Minutes Post CAC on Day 1
Ocular Itching was assessed by a trained investigator post-conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) on a 0 to 4 scale (0=none (best/no itching) to 4=severe (worst/most itching). The ocular itching was averaged across all subjects at each time point. (NCT03320434)
Timeframe: post CAC exposure at 5, 7, and 10 minutes post CAC on Day 1
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| 5 minutes post-CAC | 7 minutes post-CAC | 10 minutes post-CAC |
---|
Patanol | 1.217 | 1.358 | 1.258 |
PRT-2761 0.5% | 2.573 | 2.677 | 2.250 |
PRT-2761 0% | 2.647 | 2.629 | 2.190 |
PRT-2761 1% | 2.500 | 2.509 | 2.293 |
[back to top]
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score to Measure Fatigue by at Week 8, 12 and 24
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a method of evaluating fatigue in multiple sclerosis and is designed to differentiate fatigue from clinical depression, since both share some of the same symptoms. The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item questionnaire developed to assess the level of fatigue due to neurological disease, were each assessed on a 1-7 scale (1= no fatigue and 7= severe fatigue). The total score was calculated as the average of individual 9-items and ranged from 1 to 7 with a higher value indicating greater impairment due to fatigue. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome. (NCT03387046)
Timeframe: Week 8, 12 and 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) |
---|
| Participant 6: Week 8 | Participant 7: Week 8 | Participant 6: Week 12 | Participant 7: Week 12 | Participant 7: Week 24 |
---|
Placebo + IFN Beta-1a + Methylprednisolone | 4.3 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.3 |
[back to top]
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score to Measure Fatigue by at Week 8, 12 and 24
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a method of evaluating fatigue in multiple sclerosis and is designed to differentiate fatigue from clinical depression, since both share some of the same symptoms. The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item questionnaire developed to assess the level of fatigue due to neurological disease, were each assessed on a 1-7 scale (1= no fatigue and 7= severe fatigue). The total score was calculated as the average of individual 9-items and ranged from 1 to 7 with a higher value indicating greater impairment due to fatigue. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome. (NCT03387046)
Timeframe: Week 8, 12 and 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) |
---|
| Participant 1: Week 8 | Participant 2: Week 8 | Participant 3: Week 8 | Participant 4: Week 8 | Participant 5: Week 8 | Participant 1: Week 12 | Participant 3: Week 12 | Participant 4: Week 12 | Participant 5: Week 12 | Participant 1: Week 24 | Participant 3: Week 24 | Participant 4: Week 24 | Participant 5: Week 24 |
---|
D-aspartate + IFN Beta-1a + Methylprednisolone | 1.2 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 2 | 1 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 2 | 1.1 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) Score to Measure Fatigue at Week 8, 12 and 24
MFIS is a structured, self-report questionnaire consisting of 21 items assessing the effects of fatigue. All 21 items are scaled 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of fatigue on participant's activities. The Total MFIS score ranges from 0 to 84. A score of 0 indicates fatigue has no impact on activities and the high-end score indicates fatigue has extreme impact on activities. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome. (NCT03387046)
Timeframe: Week 8, 12 and 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) |
---|
| Participant 6: Week 8 | Participant 7: Week 8 | Participant 6: Week 12 | Participant 7: Week 12 | Participant 7: Week 24 |
---|
Placebo + IFN Beta-1a + Methylprednisolone | 27 | 29 | 27 | 30 | 43 |
[back to top]
Long Term Potentiation Measured by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
TMS is an electrophysiological technique that was used to measure neurologic changes associated with recovery from stroke via alterations in the excitability of the motor system. Motor threshold measures reflect global excitability of the corticospinal pathway, including large pyramidal cells, excitatory/inhibitory interneurons, and spinal motor neurons. Long term potentiation can be measured non invasively and painlessly, in awake humans through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS uses high intensity, brief duration, magnetic fields that, when applied on the scalp, can activate neurons within a small focal region of the cerebral cortex, through electromagnetic induction. Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) amplitudes elicited by single TMS pulses of increasing intensity (110, 120 and 130% of the Resting Motor Threshold [RMT]) will be measured to calculate recruitment curves of the motor cortex. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome. (NCT03387046)
Timeframe: Baseline (0 minute) and Post-Baseline (15 minutes) at Week 8
Intervention | millivolts (Number) |
---|
| Participants 1: Week 8 (Baseline): 110% RMT | Participants 1: Week 8 (Baseline): 120% RMT | Participants 1: Week 8 (Baseline): 130% RMT | Participants 1: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 110% RMT | Participants 1: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 120% RMT | Participants 1: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 130% RMT | Participants 3: Week 8 (Baseline): 110% RMT | Participants 3: Week 8 (Baseline): 120% RMT | Participants 3: Week 8 (Baseline): 130% RMT | Participants 3: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 110% RMT | Participants 3: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 120% RMT | Participants 3: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 130% RMT |
---|
D-aspartate + IFN Beta-1a + Methylprednisolone | 30 | 105 | 142 | 39 | 128 | 154 | 23 | 95 | 115 | 31 | 103 | 118 |
[back to top]
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) Score to Measure Fatigue at Week 8, 12 and 24
MFIS is a structured, self-report questionnaire consisting of 21 items assessing the effects of fatigue. All 21 items are scaled 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of fatigue on participant's activities. The Total MFIS score ranges from 0 to 84. A score of 0 indicates fatigue has no impact on activities and the high-end score indicates fatigue has extreme impact on activities. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome. (NCT03387046)
Timeframe: Week 8, 12 and 24
Intervention | units on a scale (Number) |
---|
| Participant 1: Week 8 | Participant 2: Week 8 | Participant 3: Week 8 | Participant 4: Week 8 | Participant 5: Week 8 | Participant 1: Week 12 | Participant 3: Week 12 | Participant 4: Week 12 | Participant 5: Week 12 | Participant 1: Week 24 | Participant 3: Week 24 | Participant 4: Week 24 | Participant 5: Week 24 |
---|
D-aspartate + IFN Beta-1a + Methylprednisolone | 8 | 27 | 15 | 2 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 12 | 15 | 10 | 48 | 12 | 15 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
[back to top]
Long Term Potentiation Measured by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
TMS is an electrophysiological technique that was used to measure neurologic changes associated with recovery from stroke via alterations in the excitability of the motor system. Motor threshold measures reflect global excitability of the corticospinal pathway, including large pyramidal cells, excitatory/inhibitory interneurons, and spinal motor neurons. Long term potentiation can be measured non invasively and painlessly, in awake humans through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). TMS uses high intensity, brief duration, magnetic fields that, when applied on the scalp, can activate neurons within a small focal region of the cerebral cortex, through electromagnetic induction. Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) amplitudes elicited by single TMS pulses of increasing intensity (110, 120 and 130% of the Resting Motor Threshold [RMT]) will be measured to calculate recruitment curves of the motor cortex. Participant wise data was reported for this outcome. (NCT03387046)
Timeframe: Baseline (0 minute) and Post-Baseline (15 minutes) at Week 8
Intervention | millivolts (Number) |
---|
| Participants 6: Week 8 (Baseline): 110% RMT | Participants 6: Week 8 (Baseline): 120% RMT | Participants 6: Week 8 (Baseline): 130% RMT | Participants 6: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 110% RMT | Participants 6: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 120% RMT | Participants 6: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 130% RMT | Participants 7: Week 8 (Baseline): 110% RMT | Participants 7: Week 8 (Baseline): 120% RMT | Participants 7: Week 8 (Baseline): 130% RMT | Participants 7: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 110% RMT | Participants 7: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 120% RMT | Participants 7: Week 8 (Post-baseline): 130% RMT |
---|
Placebo + IFN Beta-1a + Methylprednisolone | 28 | 83 | 118 | 26 | 91 | 125 | 33 | 140 | 149 | 30 | 135 | 138 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Total Complication Rate
any complications, 30 day morbidity (NCT03403517)
Timeframe: 30 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone | 19 |
Dexamethasone | 19 |
[back to top]
Mortality
any cause mortality (NCT03403517)
Timeframe: 30 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone | 0 |
Dexamethasone | 0 |
[back to top]
Hospital Stay
from operation to discharge (NCT03403517)
Timeframe: 3 months
Intervention | hours (Median) |
---|
Methylprednisolone | 98 |
Dexamethasone | 102 |
[back to top]
Complications, Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Number of patients with any complication at any time, during stay in the PACU. Complications according to DASAIMS discharge criteria (modified Aldrete criteria) (NCT03403517)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone | 51 |
Dexamethasone | 58 |
[back to top]
PACU Stay
from operation to discharge from PACU (NCT03403517)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours
Intervention | minutes (Median) |
---|
Methylprednisolone | 203 |
Dexamethasone | 186 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Pachymetry (Corneal Thickness)
Thickness of the cornea measured in microns, measured as the change from baseline (NCT03578276)
Timeframe: Month 1
Intervention | microns (Mean) |
---|
LessDrops | 3.18 |
Standard of Care | 0.63 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Macular Thickness
Thickness of the macula measured in microns, recorded as the change from baseline. (NCT03578276)
Timeframe: Month 1
Intervention | microns (Mean) |
---|
LessDrops | 4.91 |
Standard of Care | 1.30 |
[back to top]
Change From Baseline (Preoperative Exam) in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Measurement of the pressure inside the eye in mmHg, recorded as the change from baseline (NCT03578276)
Timeframe: Month 1
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|
LessDrops | -0.33 |
Standard of Care | -0.21 |
[back to top]
Survival of Treatment
Survival of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant during treatment and post treatment up to 1 year. (NCT03593902)
Timeframe: During Treatment and Post Treatment up to 1 year
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 9 |
[back to top]
Change in Skin Score by mRSS
Defined by at least a 25% improvement (decline) in skin score by modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) if skin score is greater than 14 on enrollment. If skin score is less than 14 on enrollment, improvement is defined by at least a 5% improvement on mRSS. The modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS) is a measure for skin disease in scleroderma and is calculated by summation of skin thickness in 17 different body sites. The scale ranges from at total score of normal skin thickness (0) to severe thickness (51). (NCT03593902)
Timeframe: Pre Treatment and Post Treatment
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Pre Treatment | Post Treatment |
---|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation | 25 | 16 |
[back to top]
Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS-pain) Daily Until Post-injection Day 7
Participants were instructed to log their pain twice daily (morning and night) using a VAS pain scale of 0-10 (0: no pain, 10: highest amount of pain) for the first 7 days after injection. Participants were instructed to bring that pain journal to their 2-week visit. Average daily scores are presented. (NCT03704584)
Timeframe: Post injection day (1-7), 2 weeks and at 6 weeks post intervention
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Post injection day 1 | Post injection day 2 | Post injection day 3 | Post injection day 4 | Post injection day 5 | Post injection day 6 | Post injection day 7 |
---|
Control Group (Corticosteroid Alone) | 3.7 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
Treatment Group (Corticosteroid Injection Plus Lidocaine) | 3.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.69 | 0.58 |
[back to top]
10 Point Likert Scale of Pain Scores Before the Injection and After the Injection and During Follow up in the Corticosteroid Plus Lidocaine Group as Compared to the Corticosteroid Alone Group
Pain will be assessed with a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: highest amount of pain) of anticipated pain and anxiety before injection and a 10-point pain scale of the pain of the needle, medication, overall pain and anxiety after the injection was administered to the participants. (NCT03704584)
Timeframe: Pre injection, Post injection day, 2 weeks and at 6 weeks
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Pre-Injection: How painful do you think the injection will be? | Pre-Injection: How painful do you think it will be 1-minute after the injection? | Pre-Injection: How nervous are you about the injection? | Post-Injection: Actual pain of the needle | Post-Injection: Actual pain of the medication | Post-Injection: Actual pain 1-minute after the injection |
---|
Control Group (Corticosteroid Alone) | 5.4 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 1.7 |
Treatment Group (Corticosteroid Injection Plus Lidocaine) | 5.9 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 1.7 |
[back to top]
Number of Patients With Subsequent Reinjection and Surgical Operation
The number of patients with subsequent reinjection and surgical operation was collected during follow up. (NCT03704584)
Timeframe: End of follow up (6 weeks post intervention)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Treatment Group (Corticosteroid Injection Plus Lidocaine) | 0 |
Control Group (Corticosteroid Alone) | 0 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants Who Are Eligible, Consent, and Complete the 48 Weeks Study
To establish acceptability of this treatment approach assessing proportion of patients who are eligible, consent and complete the 48 week study. We will examine how many patients in the MONITOR cohort are eligible per year. All eligible patients in the MONITOR cohort will be approached and invited to join the study. We will then review how many patients complete the 48 week study period attending all visits from baseline to 48 weeks (0, 12, 24, 36 and 48). (NCT03797872)
Timeframe: 48 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Standard Care | 0 |
[back to top]
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Total Score
The KOOS questionnaire assesses the participant's opinion about their osteoarthritis and associated problems. It consists of 5 subscales: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL) function, sport and recreation function, and knee related quality of life (QoL). The KOOS has 42 items across all subscales and response options are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = no problems and 4 = extreme problems. The sum of subscale scores is transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100 with 0 indicating extreme symptoms and 100 indicating no symptoms. A negative value means that pain has worsened from what it was at baseline, while a positive value means that pain has improved from baseline. (NCT03818737)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
,,,
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Change from Baseline at Month 1 | Change from Baseline at Month 3 | Change from Baseline at Month 6 | Change from Baseline at Month 9 | Change from Baseline at Month 12 |
---|
Adipose-derived MSCs | 14.34 | 16.30 | 17.53 | 13.36 | 17.61 |
Bone Marrow Derived MSCs | 14.48 | 18.63 | 18.39 | 14.17 | 18.52 |
Corticosteroid Injection | 17.70 | 17.21 | 17.44 | 116.30 | 19.27 |
Umbilical Cord Tissue (UCT) MSCs | 11.14 | 13.85 | 15.62 | 13.96 | 17.49 |
[back to top]
Change in Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS-pain) Score
"Pain assessment was performed using the Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS-pain). The VAS-pain is self-completed by the participant. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance in millimeters (mm) on the line between the no pain anchor and the participant's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. The recommended cut points for VAS are: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm). The change in VAS-pain score is the score from the each follow-up visit subtracted from the baseline score. A negative value means that pain has reduced from what it was at baseline." (NCT03818737)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
,,,
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|
| Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 1 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 3 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 6 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 9 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 12 |
---|
Adipose-derived MSCs | -15.9 | -17.8 | -21.6 | -17.9 | -19.9 |
Bone Marrow Derived MSCs | -20.2 | -28.8 | -23.2 | -21.9 | -25.5 |
Corticosteroid Injection | -25.2 | -21.1 | -22.7 | -23.3 | -22.3 |
Umbilical Cord Tissue (UCT) MSCs | -16.7 | -17.3 | -19.7 | -16.5 | -20.6 |
[back to top]
Change in EuroQuality of Life (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score
"The EQ-5D-3L survey measures the severity of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participants will be asked to answer questions regarding these measures and to indicate their current experience on a scale from 1 to 3 (1 being no problem and 3 being most extreme problem). A sixth item asks participants to rate their current heath from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). The answers to these questions are converted into an index value based on the country respondents live in. Health state index scores typically range from less than 0 to 1, where 0 is a health state equivalent to death and 1 is perfect health. Positive values for the change from baseline score indicate improved health." (NCT03818737)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
,,,
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|
| Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 1 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 3 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 6 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 9 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 12 |
---|
Adipose-derived MSCs | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Bone Marrow Derived MSCs | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Corticosteroid Injection | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Umbilical Cord Tissue (UCT) MSCs | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
[back to top]
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain Subscale Score
The KOOS questionnaire assesses the participant's opinion about their osteoarthritis and associated problems. It consists of 5 subscales: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL) function, sport and recreation function, and knee related quality of life (QoL). The pain subscale has 9 items and response options are given on a 5-point Likert scale where 0 = no problems and 4 = extreme problems. Scores are transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100 with 0 indicating extreme symptoms and 100 indicating no symptoms. The change in KOOS-pain subscale score is the score from each follow-up visit subtracted from the baseline score. A negative value means that pain has worsened from what it was at baseline, while a positive value means that pain has improved from baseline. (NCT03818737)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
,,,
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) |
---|
| Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 1 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 3 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 6 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 9 | Absolute Change from Baseline at Month 12 |
---|
Adipose-derived MSCs | 15.4 | 16.8 | 17.2 | 14.7 | 17.3 |
Bone Marrow Derived MSCs | 15.5 | 19.2 | 18.1 | 16.2 | 18.9 |
Corticosteroid Injection | 19.2 | 18.7 | 18.6 | 16.3 | 18.5 |
Umbilical Cord Tissue (UCT) MSCs | 11.5 | 12.8 | 15.4 | 13.9 | 16.4 |
[back to top]
Overall MRI Grade of Osteoarthritis
An MRI grade of osteoarthritis was calculated by rating features viewed by MRI (such as cartilage loss) in terms of severity and extent. Total scores range from 0 to 69 with higher values indicating more severe osteoarthritis. (NCT03818737)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12
,,,
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Month 6 | Month 12 |
---|
Adipose-derived MSCs | 39.7 | 39.3 | 39.8 |
Bone Marrow Derived MSCs | 40.5 | 40.4 | 40.8 |
Corticosteroid Injection | 38.9 | 39.3 | 39.0 |
Umbilical Cord Tissue (UCT) MSCs | 38.2 | 38.3 | 37.6 |
[back to top]
[back to top]
Oxygen-free Days
Number of days subjects did not require oxygen assistance. (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Within hospitalization or 30 days of study enrollment (whichever is sooner)
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|
Usual Care | 21.0 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 24.0 |
[back to top]
Cardiovascular Dysfunction
Number of subjects with new and/or worsening right ventricle (RV)/left ventricle (LV) dysfunction (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Within hospitalization or 30 days of study enrollment (whichever is sooner)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 1 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 1 |
[back to top]
Timely Initiation of Corticosteroids and Implementation of Biomarker-titrated Corticosteroid Dosing
Number of eligible subjects to adhered to the timely initiation and daily corticosteroid treatment according to ESICM/Society of Critical Care Medicine SCCM clinical practice guideline (control group) or biomarker concordance (intervention group) (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Within 30 days of enrollment in study.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 20 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 19 |
[back to top]
Organ Failure
Organ failures measured by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). The overall score is based on 6 sub-scores respiratory system, neurologic system, cardiovascular system, hepatic system, coagulation, and renal system using an overall scale of 0-24, which 0=no organ failure, 24=complete organ failure. (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Measured daily for approximately 5 days
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Median) |
---|
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 |
---|
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 7.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 5.5 |
Usual Care | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
[back to top]
ICU Admission
Number of subjects admitted to the ICU (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Within hospitalization or 30 days of study enrollment (whichever is sooner)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 10 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 5 |
[back to top]
Mortality
Number of subject deaths (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: 90 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 1 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 1 |
[back to top]
Myocardial Injury
Number of participants with evidence of myocardial injury determined by daily troponin peak and /or new diagnosis of Left Ventricular (LV) dysfunction (LVEF <40%) or new diagnosis of cor pulmonale (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Up to day +14 following study enrollment.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 8 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 10 |
[back to top]
Need for High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen
Number of subjects to need high flow nasal cannula oxygen (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Within hospitalization or 30 days of study enrollment (whichever is sooner)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 7 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 4 |
[back to top]
Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
Assessed by the number of participants that required invasive mechanical ventilation. (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Within hospitalization or 30 days of study enrollment (whichever is sooner)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 3 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 2 |
[back to top]
Need for Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation
Assessed by the number of participants that required noninvasive mechanical ventilation. (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Within hospitalization or 30 days of study enrollment (whichever is sooner)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 4 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 2 |
[back to top]
New Onset Cardiac Arrhythmias
Number of participants who develop arrhythmias identified by electrocardiogram or echocardiogram. (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Within hospitalization or 30 days of study enrollment (whichever is sooner)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 0 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 1 |
[back to top]
Occurrence of Delirium
Number of participants who develop delirium while receiving corticosteroids. Delirium will be assessed by Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) measurement tool. The CAM-ICU is a binary (yes/no) scale for assessing the presence of delirium. (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Up to day +5 following study enrollment.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 5 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 5 |
[back to top]
Occurrence of Hyperglycemia
Number of participants who have hyperglycemia while receiving corticosteroids. Hyperglycemia is defined as a consistently elevated blood sugar level requiring insulin administration. (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Up to day +5 following study enrollment.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 11 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 18 |
[back to top]
Occurrence of Secondary Infection
Number of participants who develop secondary infections during and after steroid therapy. A secondary infection is defined as a new infection that develops after initiation of corticosteroid therapy, until 5 days after steroids are discontinued. (NCT03852537)
Timeframe: Up to day +14 following study enrollment.
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Usual Care | 0 |
Biomarker-adjusted Steroid Dosing | 0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Antibody-Mediated Rejection
The diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection was based on Banff criteria 2017 - a set of standardized guidelines used by pathologists and clinicians to diagnose and classify rejection based on specific features observed in biopsy samples from the transplanted organ, such as the presence of certain types of immune cells, inflammation, and injury patterns. (NCT04046549)
Timeframe: Week 12, 24, 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 48 |
---|
Belatacept+VIB4920 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 15.0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR)
Histological grading of acute allograft rejection from biopsy specimens was based on Banff criteria 2017. Grade IA: Moderate tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade IB: Severe tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade II. Arterial intimal fibrosis with mononuclear cell inflammation, formation of neointima. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. (NCT04046549)
Timeframe: Week 12, 24, 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 48 |
---|
Belatacept+VIB4920 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Treated Acute Rejections
Acute rejections, per clinical judgement of the investigator followed by confirmatory biopsy, were treated with bolus methylprednisolone (other corticosteroids were acceptable at an equivalent dose) according to local practice. (NCT04046549)
Timeframe: Week 12, 24, 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 48 |
---|
Belatacept+VIB4920 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 30.0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
Histological grading of acute allograft rejection from biopsy specimens was based on Banff criteria 2017. Grade IA: Moderate tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade IB: Severe tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade II. Arterial intimal fibrosis with mononuclear cell inflammation, formation of neointima. (NCT04046549)
Timeframe: Week 12, 24, 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 48 |
---|
Belatacept+VIB4920 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) of Grade 1A or Higher, Graft Loss or Death at Week 24
Histological grading of acute allograft rejection from biopsy specimens was based on Banff criteria 2017. Grade IA: Moderate tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade IB: Severe tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade II. Arterial intimal fibrosis with mononuclear cell inflammation, formation of neointima. (NCT04046549)
Timeframe: Week 24
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
Belatacept+VIB4920 | 25.0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR), Graft Loss, Death or Loss to Follow-up (LTFU)
Histological grading of acute allograft rejection from biopsy specimens was based on Banff criteria 2017. Grade IA: Moderate tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade IB: Severe tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade II. Arterial intimal fibrosis with mononuclear cell inflammation, formation of neointima. (NCT04046549)
Timeframe: Week 12, 24, 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 48 |
---|
Belatacept+VIB4920 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
[back to top]
Percentage of Participants With Treated Biopsy-proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR) of Grade 1A or Higher, Graft Loss or Death at Weeks 12 and 48
Histological grading of acute allograft rejection from biopsy specimens was based on Banff criteria 2017. Grade IA: Moderate tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade IB: Severe tubulitis and at least moderate total cortical inflammation and at least moderate scarred cortical inflammation and other known causes ruled out. Grade II. Arterial intimal fibrosis with mononuclear cell inflammation, formation of neointima. (NCT04046549)
Timeframe: Weeks 12 and 48
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|
| Week 12 | Week 48 |
---|
Belatacept+VIB4920 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
[back to top]
Evaluation of Intraoperative Use of Dexycu on Tear Film Osmolarity at 3 Weeks Postoperatively
Tear Film Osmolarity as measured on Tear Lab system; validated measure of Tear Film Osmolarity Osmolarity was reported in milliosmoles per liter (mOsmol/L) (NCT04184999)
Timeframe: 3 weeks
Intervention | mOsmol/L (Mean) |
---|
Intracameral Dexamethasone | 311.15 |
Postoperative Prednisolone Acetate | 316.3 |
[back to top]
Number of SLE Patients That Were Sampled for RNA-seq Differential Expression Analysis (Biological Replicates)
Number of of SLE patients that were sampled for RNA-seq differential gene expression analysis in glucocorticoid-treated immune cells. The analysis employed a cutoff value of < 5% false-discovery rate (FDR) to select the transcripts that were considered differentially expressed at each time point. The resulting gene lists were contrasted to determine which genes were uniquely differentially expressed in different cell types. (NCT04233164)
Timeframe: 2 hours and 4 hours post infusion
,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| 2 hours post infusion | 4 hours post infusion |
---|
Group A: Glucocorticoids 1 mg/kg Dose | 20 | 20 |
Group B: Glucocorticoids 250 mg Dose | 20 | 20 |
[back to top]
Admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
We reported below the number of participants admitted to ICU within 28 days. (NCT04323592)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Exposed to Methylprednisolone | 15 |
Non-exposed to Methylprednisolone | 27 |
[back to top]
Change in C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Change in C-reactive protein after 7 days from baseline. A reduction of CRP reveals a laboratory improvement. (NCT04323592)
Timeframe: 7 days
Intervention | mg/L (Mean) |
---|
Exposed to Methylprednisolone | -82.08 |
Non-exposed to Methylprednisolone | -34.34 |
[back to top]
Composite Primary End-point: Admission to ICU, Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (MV), or All-cause Death by Day 28
We reported below the number of participants meeting at least one of three among death or ICU admission or Invasive mechanical ventilation. (NCT04323592)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Exposed to Methylprednisolone | 19 |
Non-exposed to Methylprednisolone | 40 |
[back to top]
Endotracheal Intubation (Invasive Mechanical Ventilation)
We reported below the number of participants who needed endotracheal intubation during ICU admission (NCT04323592)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Exposed to Methylprednisolone | 15 |
Non-exposed to Methylprednisolone | 26 |
[back to top]
Number of Days Free From Mechanical Ventilation
number of days free from mechanical ventilation (both invasive and non-invasive) by day 28 (NCT04323592)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | days (Mean) |
---|
Exposed to Methylprednisolone | 19.11 |
Non-exposed to Methylprednisolone | 14.34 |
[back to top]
In-hospital Death Within 28 Days
We reported below the number of participants who died within 28 days, during the hospital stay. (NCT04323592)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Exposed to Methylprednisolone | 6 |
Non-exposed to Methylprednisolone | 21 |
[back to top]
Loss of Lines in Uncorrected Visual Acuity
All units assessed for uncorrected visual acuity using ETDRS. Number of lines seen was then converted to LogMar to measure changes in uncorrected visual acuity between Baseline and Day 90. (NCT04380857)
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 7, Day 30 and Day 90
,
Intervention | logMAR (Mean) |
---|
| 1 week | 1 month | 3 months |
---|
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mg | -0.010 | -0.014 | -0.071 |
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Drops | 0.013 | -0.026 | -0.068 |
[back to top]
Mean Change in Pain
"post-op pain as measured as scores on an Ocular Pain Assessment Scale from 0-10 (0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain you could imagine)" (NCT04380857)
Timeframe: Change is being assessed at Baseline, Day 1, Day 7, Day 30 and Day 90
,
Intervention | Score on a scale from 0-10 (Mean) |
---|
| Pre-operative | Day 1 | Day 7 | Day 30 | Day 90 |
---|
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mg | 0.15 | 0.95 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0 |
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Drops | 0.20 | 0.90 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0 |
[back to top]
Patient Preference Between Groups
As reported by patients choosing one of five options; Strongly preferred insert, preferred insert, no preference, preferred standard drop regimen, strongly preferred standard drop regimen. (NCT04380857)
Timeframe: Day 7, Day 30 and Day 90
,,
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
| Day 7 | Day 30 | Day 90 |
---|
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mg | 14 | 11 | 9 |
No Preference | 4 | 3 | 5 |
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Drops | 2 | 3 | 3 |
[back to top]
Number of Lines Lost From Best Corrected Visual Acuity
After manifest refraction all units assessed for best corrected distance visual acuity using ETDRS. Number of lines seen was then converted to LogMar score (on a scale of -0.30 to 1.00 where smaller numbers indicate better vision and larger numbers indicate worse vision) to measure changes in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity between Baseline and Day 90 (NCT04380857)
Timeframe: Baseline through Day 90
Intervention | Score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mg | 0 |
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Drops | 0 |
[back to top]
Post op Pain Management Per Eye
Count of participants requiring pain management from Day 0 to Day 90. (NCT04380857)
Timeframe: Day 0 to Day 90
Intervention | Eyes (Count of Units) |
---|
Dexamethasone Ophthalmic Insert 0.4 mg | 0 |
Topical Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Drops | 0 |
[back to top]
Incidence of Pain
Recorded when subject reports pain. Assessed using the visual analog scale (0-10 scale). Zero indicates no pain, 10 indicates worst pain ever (NCT04900220)
Timeframe: Up to 7 days
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Betamethasone | 6 |
Methylprednisolone | 11 |
[back to top]
Intensity of Pain
Assessed using the visual analog scale (0-10 scale). Zero indicates no pain, 10 indicates worst pain ever (NCT04900220)
Timeframe: Up to 7 days
,
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Baseline | Five Minutes | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 | Day 7 |
---|
Betamethasone | 2.8 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
Methylprednisolone | 2.1 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
[back to top]
Number of Participants With Complications Following Treatment
Manipulations under anesthesia (MUAs) following total knee arthroplasty surgery and treatment (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: within 90 days after initial total knee arthroplasty
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 0 |
Placebo Taper | 0 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee 6 Weeks After Treatment
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), a single-question patient rating of 0-100, scoring their function to the area being treated. Zero represents a poor functional knee and 100 is the best functioning. (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 89.5 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee 6 Weeks After Treatment
UCLA activity score, on a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 is the most active patient with examples of activities (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 5.25 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee 6 Weeks After Treatment
VR-12: Assesses physical functioning, physical/ mental limitations. Scored as summary of mental and physical, measure in standard deviations. The scale range is 0 to 100, where a score of 100 represents the best physical and mental health and zero is the worst outcome. (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 50.28 |
[back to top]
Adverse Events or Outcomes Outside of Manipulations Under Anesthesia
Adverse outcomes including infection, avascular necrosis, and 90-day readmission rates (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: within 90 days after initial total knee arthroplasty
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 0 |
Placebo Taper | 0 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee After Surgery and Treatment
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), a survey given to patients standard of care containing 7 questions. The score ranges from 0 to 100 where zero represents total disability and 100 represents a perfect knee health. (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 72.12 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Post Treatment Pain Scores (6 Weeks)
"Using daily defense and veterans pain rating scale (DVPRS) on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the worst.~Please note, only one patient made it to the 6 week post treatment mark of the 4 enrolled. The study was terminated and none of the patients were randomized to the placebo group. All other patients followed up but were not interested in continuing. No range could be provided given only one subject answered and completed this visit" (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: 6 weeks post treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 1.93 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee 6 Wks After Treatment
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a survey scored ranging from 0 to 100, where a high score indicates a high degree of a forgetting they have an artificial joint, which is an ideal outcome. (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 57.82 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Post Treatment Pain Scores
"Knee society score (KSS); done standard of care on a scale of 0-100, where 100 means a more functional knee.~**Please note, the study was terminated early, only 4 subjects were enrolled and none were randomized to the placebo group. This is a standard of care survey available on all subjects." (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: 6 weeks post treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 78.75 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Pre Treatment Pain Scores Using Knee Society Scores
"Knee society score (KSS); done standard of care on a scale of 0-100, where 100 means a more functional knee~**Please note, the study was terminated early, only 4 subjects were enrolled and none were randomized to the placebo group." (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: pre treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 66.25 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Post Treatment Pain Scores
"Knee society score (KSS); done standard of care on a scale of 0-100, where 100 means a more functional knee.~**Please note, the study was terminated early, only 4 subjects were enrolled and none were randomized to the placebo group. At 3 weeks post treatment, only 3 of the 4 subjects enrolled were still part of the study." (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: 3 weeks post treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 68.33 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee Prior to Treatment
UCLA activity score, on a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 is the most active patient with examples of activities (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: pre treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 4.25 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee Prior to Treatment
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a survey scored ranging from 0 to 100, where a high score indicates a high degree of a forgetting they have an artificial joint, which is an ideal outcome. (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: pre treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 91.67 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee After Surgery and Treatment
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), a survey given to patients standard of care containing 7 questions. The score ranges from 0 to 100 where zero represents total disability and 100 represents a perfect knee health. (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: pre treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 50.04 |
[back to top]
Range of Motion in Degrees at Pre and Post Treatment
"Range of motion (ROM) from pre-treatment to six weeks following treatment. Patients started treatment after total knee replacement surgery and presented to clinic with at least one inclusion criteria to be enrolled. Range of motion in degrees is taken at each visit by a clinician (standard of care), starting at zero degrees (straight leg) to about 135 degrees. The ROM was documented as part of consenting and enrollment into study. Subjects returned to the office at 6 weeks post treatment where ROM was performed in a clinic setting once again and documented. ROM is done using a goniometer by a clinician in each clinic.~This study was terminated early, therefore of the 4 enrolled, zero were randomized to the placebo group. Only 1 of the four subjects completed the 6 weeks, however, ROM was captured on all as standard of care." (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6 Following Treatment
Intervention | Range of Motion in Degrees (Mean) |
---|
| Pre treatment | Post treatment |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 82.5 | 112 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures:(Immediate) Post Treatment Pain Scores
"Using Daily Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, which measures intensity of pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible).~**Please note, this study was terminated early, only enrolling 4 patients, none were randomized to the placebo group." (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: Days 1 through 6 following treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 2.33 | 3 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.67 | 2.3 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee Before Treatment
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), a single-question patient rating of 0-100, scoring their function to the area being treated. Zero represents a poor functional knee and 100 is the best functioning. (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: pre treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 29.5 |
[back to top]
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Overall Assessment of Knee Before Treatment
Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), a survey of 12 questions to measure health relating to patient's quality of life. Scored as summary of mental and physical, measure in standard deviations. The scale range is 0 to 100, where a score of 100 represents the best physical and mental health and zero is the worst outcome. (NCT05113901)
Timeframe: pre treatment
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|
Methylprednisolone Taper | 38.73 |
[back to top]
Incidence of a Flare Reaction
A flare reaction was defined as an increase of two or more points of Visual Analog Score (VAS) score during the first week following injection. The VAS is a patient reported pain score from zero to ten where zero is no pain and ten is the most pain. (NCT05438277)
Timeframe: Post-injection day 1 through 7
,
Intervention | Person-visits (Count of Units) |
---|
| Flare reaction (Yes) | Flare reaction (No) | Unknown |
---|
Methylprednisolone Acetate (MPA) | 44 | 149 | 16 |
Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) | 8 | 191 | 28 |
[back to top]