Page last updated: 2024-12-07

levobupivacaine

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Levobupivacaine is an amide local anesthetic that is the S(+) enantiomer of bupivacaine. It is a chiral molecule, meaning that it exists in two mirror-image forms. Levobupivacaine is the more potent and longer-acting form of the two enantiomers. It is typically used for pain relief after surgery or other procedures. Levobupivacaine works by blocking nerve impulses in the body, preventing the transmission of pain signals to the brain. The drug was first synthesized in the 1970s by a team of researchers at the University of Helsinki. Levobupivacaine is studied because of its potential benefits over bupivacaine, including a longer duration of action and a lower risk of side effects. Research on levobupivacaine is ongoing, and the drug is currently used in a variety of clinical settings.'

Levobupivacaine: S-enantiomer of bupivacaine that is used as a local anesthetic and for regional nerve blocks, including EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

levobupivacaine : The (S)-(-)-enantiomer of bupivacaine. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID92253
CHEMBL ID1201193
CHEBI ID6149
SCHEMBL ID34537
MeSH IDM0452926

Synonyms (63)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0471
CHEBI:6149 ,
cas-18010-40-7
NCGC00016733-01
levobupivacaine [inn:ban]
2',6'-pipecoloxylidide, 1-butyl-, l-(-)-
l(-)-bupivacaine
27262-47-1
levobupivacaine
l-(-)-1-butyl-2',6'-pipecoloxylidide
C07887
DB01002
(s)-bupivacaine
(s)-1-butyl-2',6'-pipecoloxylidide
l-(-)-bupivacaine
(-)-bupivacaine
levobupivacaine (inn)
D08116
novabupi (tn)
(2s)-1-butyl-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)piperidine-2-carboxamide
CHEMBL1201193
l-bupivacaine
novabupi
bupivacaine, (s)-
bupivacaine, (-)-
bupivacaine (-)-form
A818983
(2s)-1-butyl-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-2-piperidinecarboxamide
bdbm50350791
unii-a5h73k9u3w
a5h73k9u3w ,
levobupivacaina
bdbm50417951
S5181
AKOS016340525
gtpl7211
(2s)-1-butyl-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)piperidine-2-carboximidic acid
(s)-1-butyl-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-2-piperidinecarboxamide
levobupivacaine [who-dd]
ropivacaine hydrochloride monohydrate impurity a [ep impurity]
levobupivacaine [mart.]
bupivacaine (-)-form [mi]
levobupivacaine [vandf]
levobupivacaine [inn]
LEBVLXFERQHONN-INIZCTEOSA-N
SCHEMBL34537
KS-5195
DTXSID8048496
levobupivacaine free base
Q-100344
2-piperidinecarboxamide, 1-butyl-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-, (2s)-
mfcd00936851
(s)-1-butyl-n-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)piperidine-2-carboxamide
NCGC00159482-03
Q3272027
(s)-(-)-bupivacaine
27262-47-1 (free base)
D87861
HY-B0653
CS-0009570
(2~{s})-1-butyl-~{n}-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)piperidine-2-carboxamide
Z2242128693
oj0 ,

Research Excerpts

Overview

Levobupivacaine (Chirocaine) is a long-acting amide local anaesthetic. It is effective when administered as an epidural, spinal, peripheral nerve or ocular block, or by topical application or local infiltration. Levobupvacaine is a valid alternative to traditional local anesthetics for surgical removal of lower third molars.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Levobupivacaine is a long-acting amide local anaesthetic used in analgesia and anaesthesia. "( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Levobupivacaine.
Bampoe, S; Brunnen, D; Heppolette, CAA; Odor, PM, 2020
)
2.25
"QXOH-Levobupivacaine (LB) is a fixed-dose combination of 35-mM QXOH and 10-mM LB. "( The 14-day repeated-dose toxicity study of a fixed-dose combination, QXOH/levobupivacaine, via subcutaneous injection in beagle dogs.
Gong, D; Kang, Y; Liu, J; Yang, J; Yin, Q; Zhang, J; Zhang, W; Zhang, Y, 2021
)
1.37
"Levobupivacaine is an enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine with less cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity."( Local anesthesia for treatment of hernia in elder patients: Levobupicavaine or Bupivacaine?
Accurso, A; Amato, B; Amato, M; Aprea, G; Bianco, T; Compagna, R; Danzi, M; Fappiano, F; Rossi, R; Vigliotti, G, 2013
)
1.11
"Levobupivacaine is a valid alternative to traditional local anesthetics for surgical removal of lower third molars. "( Postoperative pain relief after surgical removal of impacted third molars: a single-blind, randomized, controlled study to compare levobupivacaine and mepivacaine.
Brienza, N; Crincoli, V; Di Bisceglie, MB; Favia, G; Giuliani, R; Massaro, M, 2009
)
2
"Levobupivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic with a clinical profile similar to that of racemic bupivacaine but with a greater margin of safety. "( The direct effect of levobupivacaine in isolated rat aorta involves lipoxygenase pathway activation and endothelial nitric oxide release.
Choi, YS; Hah, YS; Hwang, EM; Jeong, YS; Lee, SH; Ok, SH; Park, JY; Shin, IW; Sohn, JT, 2010
)
2.12
"Levobupivacaine (Chirocaine) is a long-acting amide local anaesthetic that is effective when administered as an epidural, spinal, peripheral nerve or ocular block, or by topical application or local infiltration. "( Levobupivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and pain management.
Keating, GM; Sanford, M, 2010
)
3.25
"Levobupivacaine is a long acting local anesthetic with less cardiovascular toxicity. "( [Comparison of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia].
Goyagi, T; Kudo, R; Nishikawa, T, 2010
)
2.16
"Levobupivacaine is a new long-acting local anesthetic, which is the isolated S-enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine with less cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity than bupivacaine. "( A comparison of spinal isobaric levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower extremity surgery.
Bn, KP; Bn, MT; Bn, RK; Sathitkarnmanee, T; Thongrong, C; Tribuddharat, S, 2011
)
2.1
"Levobupivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic that intrinsically produces vasoconstriction in isolated vessels. "( Levobupivacaine-induced contraction of isolated rat aorta is calcium dependent.
Baik, JS; Chung, YK; Hwang, EM; Kim, JG; Ok, SH; Park, JY; Park, SS; Sohn, JT; Sung, HJ, 2011
)
3.25
"Levobupivacaine is a long-acting amide local anesthetic that intrinsically produces vasoconstriction both in vivo and in vitro. "( Protein kinases participate in the contraction in response to levobupivacaine in the rat aorta.
Kwon, SC; Lee, SH; Ok, SH; Shim, HS; Sohn, JT, 2012
)
2.06
"Levobupivacaine is an enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine with less cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity."( Comparative study between Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine for hernia surgery in the elderly.
Amato, B; Amato, M; Aprea, G; Compagna, R; Coretti, G; Iacono, F; Militello, C; Prezioso, D; Puzziello, A; Vigliotti, G, 2012
)
1.4
"Levobupivacaine 7.5 g ml(-1) is an isobaric solution within all patient groups at 37 degrees C [corrected]"( Density of spinal anaesthetic solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with and without dextrose.
McLeod, GA, 2004
)
1.29
"Levobupivacaine is an effective local anaesthetic agent for nerve blockade with less systemic toxicity than racemic bupivacaine. "( Plasma levobupivacaine concentrations following scalp block in patients undergoing awake craniotomy.
Cormack, JR; Costello, TG; Harris, K; LaFerlita, B; Mather, LE; Murphy, MA, 2005
)
2.23
"Levobupivacaine is an effective agent for caudal anesthesia in children at a recommended dose of 2.5 mg x kg(-1). "( Levobupivacaine caudal anesthesia in children: a randomized double-blind comparison with bupivacaine.
Downie, S; Frawley, GP; Huang, GH, 2006
)
3.22

Effects

Levobupivacaine has a vasoconstrictive effect in 0.25% concentrations that may be beneficial in tonsillectomy patients. It has been recommended as the agent of choice for extending low-dose epidural analgesia for emergency caesarean section.

Levobupivacaine has less toxic potential on both the cardiovascular and central nervous system and has been widely used for postoperative epidural analgesia in surgical patients. It has excellent anesthetic effect in epidural anesthesia for gynecology and is suitable for clinical use.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Levobupivacaine has a relatively greater advantage in reducing opioids requirement and decreasing the pain score of patients, and bilateral superficial cervical plexus blockade and pre thyroidectomy intervention have more advantages than local wound infiltration and post thyroidectomy intervention in alleviating patients' pain."( Drugs used in regional block analgesia for thyroidectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Can, G; Jiang Sheng, H; Xin, W; Zhe Xu, C, 2022
)
2.16
"Levobupivacaine has a greater vasodilatory effect than ropivacaine. "( Regional anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a comparison between ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.
Arlati, S; Bettinelli, L; Bracconaro, G; Cristalli, A; Marconi, G; Zerbi, S, 2009
)
2.02
"Levobupivacaine has a greater safety margin for cardiotoxicity than bupivacaine; consequently it has been recommended as the agent of choice for extending low-dose epidural analgesia for emergency caesarean section. "( Low-dose epidural top up for emergency caesarean delivery: a randomised comparison of levobupivacaine versus lidocaine/epinephrine/fentanyl.
Balaji, P; Dhillon, P; Russell, IF, 2009
)
2.02
"Levobupivacaine has a vasoconstrictive effect in 0.25% concentrations that may be beneficial in tonsillectomy patients and has a consistent analgesic effect."( Vasoconstrictive and analgesic efficacy of locally infiltrated levobupivacaine in tonsillectomy patients.
Akin, I; Akkaya, T; Aladag, E; Alicura, S; Ergil, J; Gozaydin, O; Gumus, H; Gunsoy, B, 2012
)
2.06
"Levobupivacaine 5 g ml(-1) has a significantly higher density compared with bupivacaine 5 g ml(-1) and ropivacaine 5 g ml(-1) at 23 and 37 degrees C both with and without dextrose."( Density of spinal anaesthetic solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with and without dextrose.
McLeod, GA, 2004
)
1.29
"Levobupivacaine has a relatively greater advantage in reducing opioids requirement and decreasing the pain score of patients, and bilateral superficial cervical plexus blockade and pre thyroidectomy intervention have more advantages than local wound infiltration and post thyroidectomy intervention in alleviating patients' pain."( Drugs used in regional block analgesia for thyroidectomy: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Can, G; Jiang Sheng, H; Xin, W; Zhe Xu, C, 2022
)
2.16
"Levobupivacaine group has shown a greater request for paracetamol while patients who experienced bupivacaine have showed a higher request of other analgesics."( Local anesthesia for treatment of hernia in elder patients: Levobupicavaine or Bupivacaine?
Accurso, A; Amato, B; Amato, M; Aprea, G; Bianco, T; Compagna, R; Danzi, M; Fappiano, F; Rossi, R; Vigliotti, G, 2013
)
1.11
"Levobupivacaine has less toxic potential on both the cardiovascular and central nervous system and has been widely used for postoperative epidural analgesia in surgical patients. "( Comparative efficacy of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for epidural block in outpatients with degenerative spinal disease.
Araki, H; Egashira, T; Fukasaki, M; Hara, T; Okada, M; Sakai, A; Terao, Y,
)
1.88
"Levobupivacaine has been developed as a safer alternative to bupivacaine because of its reduced systemic toxicity. "( Effects of levobupivacaine on isolated rat tracheal smooth muscle.
Chang, HC; Chen, SY; Cherng, YG; Huang, YF; Liu, FL; Wang, HW, 2015
)
2.25
"Levobupivacaine has excellent anesthetic effect in epidural anesthesia for gynecology and it is suitable for clinical use."( Application of Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine in Epidural Anesthesia for Gynecological Surgery.
Ma, MY; Wang, Y; Wang, YP; Zhang, Y,
)
1.86
"Levobupivacaine has been extensively evaluated for spinal anesthesia. "( Effects of baricity of 0.5% or 0.75% levobupivacaine on the onset time of spinal anesthesia: a randomized trial.
Adamanti, S; Baciarello, M; Danelli, G; De Marco, G; Di Cianni, S; Fanelli, G; Zasa, M, 2008
)
2.06
"Levobupivacaine has less central nervous system side effects than racemic bupivacaine, but its anesthetic effect is not as intense. "( Comparison of histologic spinal cord and neurologic changes in guinea pigs after subarachnoid block with large volumes of racemic bupivacaine, 50% enantiomeric excess bupivacaine (S75-R25), and levobupivacaine.
Capelozzi, M; Capelozzi, VL; Posso, Ide P; Vasconcelos Filho, PO,
)
1.76
"Levobupivacaine has a greater vasodilatory effect than ropivacaine. "( Regional anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a comparison between ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.
Arlati, S; Bettinelli, L; Bracconaro, G; Cristalli, A; Marconi, G; Zerbi, S, 2009
)
2.02
"Levobupivacaine has a greater safety margin for cardiotoxicity than bupivacaine; consequently it has been recommended as the agent of choice for extending low-dose epidural analgesia for emergency caesarean section. "( Low-dose epidural top up for emergency caesarean delivery: a randomised comparison of levobupivacaine versus lidocaine/epinephrine/fentanyl.
Balaji, P; Dhillon, P; Russell, IF, 2009
)
2.02
"Levobupivacaine has a vasoconstrictive effect in 0.25% concentrations that may be beneficial in tonsillectomy patients and has a consistent analgesic effect."( Vasoconstrictive and analgesic efficacy of locally infiltrated levobupivacaine in tonsillectomy patients.
Akin, I; Akkaya, T; Aladag, E; Alicura, S; Ergil, J; Gozaydin, O; Gumus, H; Gunsoy, B, 2012
)
2.06
"Levobupivacaine 5 g ml(-1) has a significantly higher density compared with bupivacaine 5 g ml(-1) and ropivacaine 5 g ml(-1) at 23 and 37 degrees C both with and without dextrose."( Density of spinal anaesthetic solutions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine with and without dextrose.
McLeod, GA, 2004
)
1.29
"Levobupivacaine (0.5%) has better anaesthetic properties with respect to 0.75% ropivacaine and is well-suited for peribulbar block in cataract surgery."( Efficacy and comparison of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 0.75% ropivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery.
Celleno, D; Di Donato, A; Fontana, C; Lancia, F, 2006
)
2.06

Actions

Levobupivacaine did not cause any significant changes in haemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure. It showed a similar sensory block onset time compared with bupivacane, but it had a significantly longer motor block onset times. Levobupvacaine produced an increase in amplitude of contractions, while bupavacaine showed an increased trend in frequency.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Levobupivacaine may produce a sensory and motor block that is different from that produced by bupivacaine, the most popular local anaesthetic for parturients undergoing caesarean section (CS)."( An unusually prolonged duration of spinal anaesthesia following 0.5% levobupivacaine.
Bigat, Z; Ertugrul, F; Karsli, B; Kayacan, N, 2012
)
1.33
"Levobupivacaine did not cause any significant changes in haemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure, and showed a similar sensory block onset time compared with bupivacaine, but it had a significantly longer motor block onset time compared with bupivacaine."( Intrathecal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine: which should be used for elderly patients?
Bigat, Z; Ertugrul, F; Gulec, D; Karsli, B; Kayacan, N, 2014
)
1.42
"Levobupivacaine may produce a sensory and motor block different from that produced by bupivacaine, which is the most popular local anesthetic in parturients undergoing cesarean section. "( A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study.
Firat, V; Gunusen, I; Karaman, S; Sargin, A, 2011
)
2.06
"Levobupivacaine produced an increase in amplitude of contractions, while bupivacaine showed an increased trend in frequency."( Effects of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on rat myometrium.
Li, ZG; Tang, HF; Zhou, L, 2006
)
1.45

Treatment

Levobupivacaine treated group required significantly more intravenous tramadol when compared with paracetamol and lornoxicam groups in patients submitted to transperitoneal laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery. Treatment inhibited the development of pain hypersensitivity for two hours.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Levobupivacaine treated group required significantly more intravenous tramadol when compared with paracetamol and lornoxicam groups in patients submitted to transperitoneal laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery."( Comparıson of different postoperative paın managements in patients submitted to transperitoneal laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery.
Aslan, Y; Atan, A; Balci, M; Postaci, A; Tuncel, A,
)
1.57
"Treatment with levobupivacaine inhibited the development of pain hypersensitivity for two hours."( Dexmedetomidine prolongs levobupivacaine analgesia via inhibition of inflammation and p38 MAPK phosphorylation in rat dorsal root ganglion.
Amaya, F; Matsuda, M; Sawa, T; Yamaguchi, Y; Yamakita, S, 2017
)
1.1
"Pretreatment with levobupivacaine produced significant changes in agonist-induced platelet P-selectin translocation, ATP release, thromboxane A2 (TxA2) production, and calcium mobilization in a dose-dependent manner."( Levobupivacaine differentially suppresses platelet aggregation by modulating calcium release in a dose-dependent manner.
Day, YJ; Hung, LM; Liao, CH; Lin, HT; Liou, JT; Liu, FC; Mao, CC, 2012
)
2.15

Toxicity

5% levobupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for SCB did not influence the hemodynamics and frequency of adverse effects.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" PCB was found to be a safe pain-relief method for low-risk parturients."( A comparative study of the safety of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.25% racemic bupivacaine for paracervical block in the first stage of labor.
Huhtala, H; Kirkinen, P; Palomäki, O, 2005
)
0.59
"General anesthesia produced physiological perturbations, exacerbated local anesthetic-induced cardiovascular depression, and changed the pharmacokinetics of toxic doses of local anesthetics."( The effects of general anesthesia on the central nervous and cardiovascular system toxicity of local anesthetics.
Copeland, SE; Gu, XQ; Ladd, LA; Mather, LE, 2008
)
0.35
" The present article provides a concise review of the toxic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine."( The toxicity of local anesthetics: the place of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.
Graf, BM; Zink, W, 2008
)
0.82
" Experimental studies and case reports confirm this hypothesis, showing that ropivacaine is characterized by fewer (cardio) toxic effects and, most probably, a greater margin of safety."( The toxicity of local anesthetics: the place of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.
Graf, BM; Zink, W, 2008
)
0.58
" We highlight how these toxic effects have motivated the search for a safe and long-acting local anesthetic."( Local anesthetic systemic toxicity.
Dillane, D; Finucane, BT, 2010
)
0.36
" Local anaesthesia is however associated with potential risks and adverse reactions including toxicity."( Local anaesthetic toxicity.
Maher, AJ; Metcalfe, SA; Parr, S, 2008
)
0.35
"Local anaesthesia although safe has the potential to cause serious harm in the event of toxicity."( Local anaesthetic toxicity.
Maher, AJ; Metcalfe, SA; Parr, S, 2008
)
0.35
" Adverse effects were rare and unrelated to the choice of drug."( Evidence-based clinical update: Which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects?
Cox, RG; Dobereiner, EF; Ewen, A; Lardner, DR, 2010
)
0.36
" Adverse effects in human studies are rare, mild, and unrelated to the choice of drug."( Evidence-based clinical update: Which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects?
Cox, RG; Dobereiner, EF; Ewen, A; Lardner, DR, 2010
)
0.36
" This may contribute to a further increase in the safe use of spinal anesthesia in the clinical setting."( Spinal anesthesia revisited: toxicity of new and old drugs and compounds.
Hampl, K; Steinfeldt, T; Wulf, H, 2014
)
0.4
" No adverse events were reported."( Single Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block is Safe and Effective for Emergency Pain Relief in Hip-fracture Patients.
Dijksman, LM; Groot, L; Rebel, JR; Simons, MP; Zwartsenburg, MM, 2015
)
0.42
"In a busy Dutch ED with rotating residents of varying levels of experience, FICB seems to be an efficient, safe and practical method for pain reduction in patients with a hip fracture."( Single Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block is Safe and Effective for Emergency Pain Relief in Hip-fracture Patients.
Dijksman, LM; Groot, L; Rebel, JR; Simons, MP; Zwartsenburg, MM, 2015
)
0.42
" The aim of this study was to characterize levobupivacaine absorption pharmacokinetics, with and without epinephrine, and estimate the risk of LAST, based on a previously reported toxic threshold."( Levobupivacaine absorption pharmacokinetics with and without epinephrine during TAP block: analysis of doses based on the associated risk of local anaesthetic toxicity.
Altermatt, FR; Araneda, A; Cortínez, LI; Corvetto, MA; Echevarría, GC; Miranda, P, 2016
)
2.14
" Our study shows LRSB is effective and safe for laparoscopic abdominal surgery."( Laparoscopic-assisted Rectus Sheath Block as a Novel Technique is Effective and Safe: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ebihara, Y; Hirano, S; Kurashima, Y; Miyazaki, D; Murakami, S; Nakamura, T; Noji, T; Okamura, K; Shichinohe, T; Tsuchikawa, T, 2017
)
0.46
" All adverse events during the hospital stay were recorded."( A prospective, randomized, open label, controlled study investigating the efficiency and safety of 3 different methods of rectus sheath block analgesia following midline laparotomy.
Anttila, M; Eskelinen, M; Hautajärvi, H; Kinnunen, M; Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Lehtonen, M; Purdy, M, 2018
)
0.48
" No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported."( A prospective, randomized, open label, controlled study investigating the efficiency and safety of 3 different methods of rectus sheath block analgesia following midline laparotomy.
Anttila, M; Eskelinen, M; Hautajärvi, H; Kinnunen, M; Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Lehtonen, M; Purdy, M, 2018
)
0.48
"1 ng·mL, remained far below theoretical toxic thresholds."( Transversus Abdominal Plane Block in Children: Efficacy and Safety: A Randomized Clinical Study and Pharmacokinetic Profile.
Bringuier, S; Capdevila, X; Dadure, C; Mathieu, O; Menacé, C; Raux, O; Saour, AC; Sola, C, 2019
)
0.51
"The onset and duration of sensory block and analgesia, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse effects were recorded."( Hemodynamic Safety and Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Superficial Cervical Block Quality for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Study.
Lijovic, L; Pazur, I; Perisa, N; Radocaj, T; Skrtic, M, 2023
)
0.91
"5% levobupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for SCB did not influence the hemodynamics and frequency of adverse effects."( Hemodynamic Safety and Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Superficial Cervical Block Quality for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Study.
Lijovic, L; Pazur, I; Perisa, N; Radocaj, T; Skrtic, M, 2023
)
1.53

Pharmacokinetics

levobupivacaine is extensively metabolised in the liver, and excreted in the urine and faeces. Epinephrine prolonged the levob upvacaine absorption half-life {4.5}. The plasma concentrations of ropivACaine approached the Cmax significantly faster than those of levob Upvacain.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The pharmacokinetic profiles of the two bupivacaine enantiomers differs and that of racemic bupivacaine may be age dependent."( Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine 0.25% following caudal administration in children under 2 years of age.
Austin, S; Chalkiadis, GA; Cranswick, N; Eyres, RL; Taylor, RH, 2004
)
0.65
" Sampling in future pharmacokinetic studies in this age group should extend beyond 60 min."( Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine 0.25% following caudal administration in children under 2 years of age.
Austin, S; Chalkiadis, GA; Cranswick, N; Eyres, RL; Taylor, RH, 2004
)
0.65
"The highest Cmax reached in this study was close to the toxic threshold of adult patients."( Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine (2.5 mg/kg) after caudal administration in children younger than 3 years.
Cortínez, LI; Fuentes, R; Muñoz, HR; Ostermann, P; Solari, S; Vega, M, 2008
)
0.67
" Tissue-to-plasma partition coefficients calculated from the total (protein-bound and unbound) and unbound concentrations in plasma and brain as well as pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma and cerebral extracellular fluid were compared among the three anesthetics."( Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine in plasma and brain in awake rats.
Asada, A; Hase, I; Ikeda, Y; Miyake, W; Nakamura, T; Oda, Y; Takahashi, R, 2010
)
0.62
" The safety profile of different drugs can be better estimated by comparing their pharmacokinetic profiles than by considering their objective side effects."( A Comparison of Differences Between the Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine During Continuous Epidural Infusion: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Controlled Trial.
Allegri, M; Braschi, A; Cusato, M; De Andrés, J; Fanelli, G; Ingelmo, P; Niebel, TL; Perotti, L; Regazzi, M; Riva, F; Somaini, M; Tinelli, C, 2015
)
0.65
" The plasma concentrations of ropivacaine approached the Cmax significantly faster than those of levobupivacaine."( A Comparison of Differences Between the Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine During Continuous Epidural Infusion: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind Controlled Trial.
Allegri, M; Braschi, A; Cusato, M; De Andrés, J; Fanelli, G; Ingelmo, P; Niebel, TL; Perotti, L; Regazzi, M; Riva, F; Somaini, M; Tinelli, C, 2015
)
0.87
" There is, however, no pharmacokinetic data to support the currently recommended doses."( Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine following infant spinal anesthesia.
Bjorksten, A; Frawley, G; Hallett, B; Velkov, T, 2016
)
0.76
"This was an open-label pharmacokinetic safety and tolerability study of levobupivacaine spinal anesthesia in infants <55 weeks Post Menstrual Age undergoing lower abdominal surgery."( Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine following infant spinal anesthesia.
Bjorksten, A; Frawley, G; Hallett, B; Velkov, T, 2016
)
0.99
", half-life (t 1/2β ), was prolonged, and the elimination rate constants (K 12 and K 10) were significantly decreased (P < 0."( Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine Used for Epidural Anesthesia in Patients with Liver Dysfunction.
Li, F; Ma, M; Ran, J; Wang, Y; Zhang, W, 2015
)
0.68
" Peak concentration was decreased by 26 to 30% in the subjects receiving Intralipid®."( Effect of Intralipid® on the Dose of Ropivacaine or Levobupivacaine Tolerated by Volunteers: A Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study.
Benhamou, D; Charbit, B; Dureau, P; Mazoit, JX; Nicolas, N, 2016
)
0.68
" A pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the NONMEM statistical programme."( Levobupivacaine absorption pharmacokinetics with and without epinephrine during TAP block: analysis of doses based on the associated risk of local anaesthetic toxicity.
Altermatt, FR; Araneda, A; Cortínez, LI; Corvetto, MA; Echevarría, GC; Miranda, P, 2016
)
1.88
" Epinephrine prolonged the levobupivacaine absorption half-life {4."( Levobupivacaine absorption pharmacokinetics with and without epinephrine during TAP block: analysis of doses based on the associated risk of local anaesthetic toxicity.
Altermatt, FR; Araneda, A; Cortínez, LI; Corvetto, MA; Echevarría, GC; Miranda, P, 2016
)
2.17
" Cases of toxicity and the limited pharmacokinetic information during pregnancy motivated this study."( Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine with epinephrine in transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section.
Altermatt, FR; Cortínez, LI; Corvetto, MA; Lacassie, HJ; Rolle, A; Solari, S, 2018
)
0.8
" Evidence to support any particular local anesthetic regimen as well as pharmacokinetic and systemic toxicity risks of TAP block remain insufficiently studied in children."( Transversus Abdominal Plane Block in Children: Efficacy and Safety: A Randomized Clinical Study and Pharmacokinetic Profile.
Bringuier, S; Capdevila, X; Dadure, C; Mathieu, O; Menacé, C; Raux, O; Saour, AC; Sola, C, 2019
)
0.51
" Pharmacokinetic profile study of levobupivacaine was also performed."( Transversus Abdominal Plane Block in Children: Efficacy and Safety: A Randomized Clinical Study and Pharmacokinetic Profile.
Bringuier, S; Capdevila, X; Dadure, C; Mathieu, O; Menacé, C; Raux, O; Saour, AC; Sola, C, 2019
)
0.79
" However, the dosing regimen is still empirical, and the pharmacokinetic properties of levobupivacaine are not considered."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine During Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Children.
Khier, S; Mathieu, O; Menacé, C; Nolain, P; Vincent, M, 2020
)
1.07
" The population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the NONMEM software."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine During Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Children.
Khier, S; Mathieu, O; Menacé, C; Nolain, P; Vincent, M, 2020
)
0.84
" The pharmacokinetic properties of levobupivacaine are similar to that of bupivacaine; both extensively metabolised in the liver, and excreted in the urine and faeces."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Levobupivacaine.
Bampoe, S; Brunnen, D; Heppolette, CAA; Odor, PM, 2020
)
1.09

Compound-Compound Interactions

Levobupivacaine infiltration through the nephrostomy tract in combination with intravenous paracetamol infusion was shown to be safe and efficacious as an analgesia method after PCNL.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The current trial describes the dose-response relation of levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine, combined with sufentanil, when used for intrathecal labor analgesia."( Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesia.
Deprest, J; Dreelinck, R; Dubois, J; Kumar, A; Lewi, L; Van de Velde, M; Vandermeersch, E, 2007
)
0.81
"5% (10 mg) combined with either intrathecal fentanyl (10 and 20 microg), or sufentanil (5 microg) in terms of sensory and motor block characteristics."( Comparison of intrathecal bupivacaine and levobupivacaine combined with opioids for Caesarean section.
Bremerich, DH; Byhahn, C; Fetsch, N; Gogarten, W; Meininger, D; Zwissler, BC, 2007
)
0.6
"5% combined with sufentanil 5 microg was the most appropriate anaesthetic regimen in parturients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery in spinal anaesthesia."( Comparison of intrathecal bupivacaine and levobupivacaine combined with opioids for Caesarean section.
Bremerich, DH; Byhahn, C; Fetsch, N; Gogarten, W; Meininger, D; Zwissler, BC, 2007
)
0.6
"125%), all in combination with sufentanil 1 microg/mL with regard to postoperative pain relief and absence of motor block in a patient-controlled epidural analgesia setting."( Postoperative epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty with sufentanil 1 microg/ml combined with ropivacaine 0.2%, ropivacaine 0.125%, or levobupivacaine 0.125%: a randomized, double-blind comparison.
Dahan, A; Rose, L; Sitsen, E; Stienstra, R; van Alphen, W; van Poorten, F,
)
0.33
"To investigate the clinical effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine."( [Effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine].
Ruan, XC; She, SZ; Su, J; Xie, XQ; Xu, LX, 2008
)
0.75
" 4 microg/ml combined with levobupivacaine 2 mg/ml was given for postoperative epidural patient-controlled analgesia."( [Effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine].
Ruan, XC; She, SZ; Su, J; Xie, XQ; Xu, LX, 2008
)
0.85
"Epidural clonidine 2-4 microg/kg pretreatment improves the clinical effects of epidural PCA using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine."( [Effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine].
Ruan, XC; She, SZ; Su, J; Xie, XQ; Xu, LX, 2008
)
0.76
"To evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative local anesthetic infiltration in combination with intravenous paracetamol infusion on postoperative pain management in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)."( Efficacy of levobupivacaine infiltration to nephrosthomy tract in combination with intravenous paracetamol on postoperative analgesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients.
Dogan, HS; Gokten, OE; Kilicarslan, H; Kordan, Y; Turker, G, 2011
)
0.75
"Levobupivacaine infiltration through the nephrostomy tract in combination with intravenous paracetamol infusion was shown to be safe and efficacious as an analgesia method after PCNL."( Efficacy of levobupivacaine infiltration to nephrosthomy tract in combination with intravenous paracetamol on postoperative analgesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients.
Dogan, HS; Gokten, OE; Kilicarslan, H; Kordan, Y; Turker, G, 2011
)
2.19
"Our prospective, randomized, double-blind study aimed to detect the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on the postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section."( [Assessment of the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section].
Acar, P; Akyol, O; Ozyuvacı, E; Toprak, N; Vatansever, S, 2010
)
0.85
" The aim of this study was to investigate the block characteristics, the clinical efficacy, surgeon and patient satisfaction, and hemodynamic effects of using different doses of intrathecal plain levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl."( A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study.
Firat, V; Gunusen, I; Karaman, S; Sargin, A, 2011
)
0.8
"5) or 10 mg (group 10), all combined with fentanyl 25, 15 or 10 μg, respectively."( A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study.
Firat, V; Gunusen, I; Karaman, S; Sargin, A, 2011
)
0.61
"5 mg combined with fentanyl 15 μg is suitable for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section."( A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study.
Firat, V; Gunusen, I; Karaman, S; Sargin, A, 2011
)
0.61
" We employed levobupivacaine for epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia using remifentanil and sevoflurane for thymectomy with thoracoscopy for generalized type of myasthenia gravis."( [A case of anesthetic management using levobupivacaine in epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia for thymectomy with thoracoscopy for generalized type myasthenia gravis].
Fujino, Y; Fujita, T; Inoue, S; Maeda, K; Matsuyama, C; Ogawa, N; Ohuchi, M; Ozaki, Y; Saotome, T, 2012
)
1.02
" The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of bupivacaine with ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in combination with sufentanil (BUPI-, ROPI-, and LBUPI-SUF respectively) in epidural analgesia for labor."( Efficacy and safety of local anesthetics bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in combination with sufentanil in epidural anesthesia for labor and delivery: a meta-analysis.
Fang, F; Lv, BS; Mi, WD; Wang, JH; Wang, W; Wang, XW; Wang, ZQ, 2014
)
0.84
"Because of lower desflurane consumption, a superior recovery profile, and a high degree of patient acceptance, general anaesthesia in combination with interscalene block may be preferred in arthroscopic shoulder surgery."( Bispectral index-guided general anaesthesia in combination with interscalene block reduces desflurane consumption in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a clinical comparison of bupivacaine versus levobupivacaine.
Albayrak, T; Kanbak, O; Kesimci, E; Ozturk, L, 2015
)
0.61
"This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of magnesium sulfate combined with a levobupivacaine periarticular cocktail in the early postoperative period after total knee arthroplasty (TKA)."( Magnesium Sulfate Combined with a Levobupivacaine Periarticular Cocktail for Analgesia in the Early Postoperative Period after Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Li, W; Liu, H; Peng, H; Wu, H; Zhang, X; Zhao, Z, 2021
)
1.12
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the latency, extent of analgesia, and duration of motor block of levobupivacaine alone and combined with methadone or dexmedetomidine after epidural administration during and after mastectomy in dogs."( Analgesic, cardiorespiratory effects and motor block characteristics of epidural levobupivacaine alone or in combination with methadone or dexmedetomidine in bitches undergoing unilateral total mastectomy.
Albuquerque, VB; Barbosa, CF; Caramalac, SM; Frazílio, FO; Jardim, PHA; Oliveira, AR, 2022
)
1.16

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"05} and reduced its relative bioavailability (0."( Levobupivacaine absorption pharmacokinetics with and without epinephrine during TAP block: analysis of doses based on the associated risk of local anaesthetic toxicity.
Altermatt, FR; Araneda, A; Cortínez, LI; Corvetto, MA; Echevarría, GC; Miranda, P, 2016
)
1.88
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" After analysis, BSV for absorption rate constant, distribution volume, and clearance were 81%, 47%, and 41%, respectively."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine During Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Children.
Khier, S; Mathieu, O; Menacé, C; Nolain, P; Vincent, M, 2020
)
0.84

Dosage Studied

Levobupivacaine at a higher dosage provided longer duration of spinal anesthesia with better safety profile in sequential bilateral TKA. We investigated the effect of the addition of clonidine to the MLAC of levobupvacaine in a randomized controlled dose-response trial.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" A dose-response relationship was observed both with regard to median duration of postoperative analgesia (0."( A comparison of three different concentrations of levobupivacaine for caudal block in children.
Codipietro, L; De Negri, P; Eksborg, S; Grossetti, R; Italiano, S; Ivani, G; Lonnqvist, PA; Mossetti, V; Rosso, F; Tonetti, F, 2003
)
0.57
" In this respect, further studies related to dosage of intrathecal levobupivacaine in obstetric labor analgesia will be beneficial in substantiating this point."( Intrathecal labor analgesia using levobupivacaine 2.5 mg with fentanyl 25 microg--would half the dose suffice?
Chan, SY; Chiu, JW, 2004
)
0.84
"Continuous spinal anaesthesia with spinal catheters allows incremental dosing of local anaesthetic and, consequently, less haemodynamic changes."( Minimum effective local anaesthetic dose of isobaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered via a spinal catheter for hip replacement surgery.
Aantaa, R; Jalonen, J; Olkkola, KT; Sell, A, 2005
)
0.58
"The groups were similar with respect to age, weight and dosage of local anaesthetic."( Pharmacokinetics of 0.5% levobupivacaine following ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve blockade in children.
Ala-Kokko, TI; Alahuhta, S; Karinen, J; Kiviluoma, K; Räihä, E, 2005
)
0.63
" The myocardial depressant potential of these drugs in sublethal dosage is unknown."( The myocardial and vascular effects of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine using pressure volume loops.
Royse, AG; Royse, CF, 2005
)
0.58
"Intermittent epidural bolus dosing is a method of drug delivery that can prolong the duration of labour analgesia induced by a combined spinal epidural (CSE)."( Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion.
Lim, Y; Ocampo, C; Sia, AT, 2005
)
0.33
" Although minimum local analgesic concentration studies suggested that they are less potent than bupivacaine, full dose-response studies have not been performed."( Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesia.
Deprest, J; Dreelinck, R; Dubois, J; Kumar, A; Lewi, L; Van de Velde, M; Vandermeersch, E, 2007
)
0.57
" Group-specific dose-response curves were constructed using a probit regression model."( Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesia.
Deprest, J; Dreelinck, R; Dubois, J; Kumar, A; Lewi, L; Van de Velde, M; Vandermeersch, E, 2007
)
0.57
"This full dose-response study suggests that ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are of similar potency, whereas bupivacaine is more potent than both other drugs."( Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, combined with sufentanil, for labor analgesia.
Deprest, J; Dreelinck, R; Dubois, J; Kumar, A; Lewi, L; Van de Velde, M; Vandermeersch, E, 2007
)
0.81
" Our objective was to apply patient control to paravertebral analgesia and evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of two distinct dosing regimens."( The feasibility of patient-controlled paravertebral analgesia for major breast cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of two regimens.
Buggy, DJ; Burlacu, CL; Freir, NM; McElwain, J; Moriarty, DC; Sessler, DI, 2008
)
0.35
" The dosage of PCA drug 0-4 h after operation of the C2 was significantly higher than that of the C4 group."( [Effects of epidural clonidine pretreatment in epidural patient-controlled analgesia using sufentanil combined with levobupivacaine].
Ruan, XC; She, SZ; Su, J; Xie, XQ; Xu, LX, 2008
)
0.56
" However, no reports of levobupivacaine concentrations have been published with this dosing scheme."( Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine (2.5 mg/kg) after caudal administration in children younger than 3 years.
Cortínez, LI; Fuentes, R; Muñoz, HR; Ostermann, P; Solari, S; Vega, M, 2008
)
0.98
" The muscle strips were then exposed to cumulative concentrations of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine and dose-response curves were generated."( A comparison of the inhibitory effects of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine on isolated human pregnant myometrium contractility.
Briggs, LP; Campion, DP; Carey, MF; Collins, CB; Fanning, RA; Keely, S; O'Connor, JJ, 2008
)
0.81
" The dose for the first patient in each group was 8 mg, and the dosing increment was set at 1 mg."( The median effective dose of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine after intrathecal injection in lower limb surgery.
Fong, SY; Gin, T; Lee, YY; Liu, JT; Ngan Kee, WD, 2009
)
0.62
" In phase 2, a further 70 patients were randomly allocated to receive spinal anaesthesia with doses in the upper dose-response range to define the ED95."( Relative potencies of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine for neonatal spinal anaesthesia.
Frawley, G; Ingelmo, P; Smith, KR, 2009
)
0.63
" Cumulative levobupivacaine dose-response curves over a range of 10(-6) to 3 x 10(-4) M were constructed in 1) aortic rings with no drug pretreatment; 2) endothelium-denuded rings pretreated with quinacrine dihydrochloride (nonspecific phospholipase A(2) inhibitor: 2 x 10(-5), 4 x 10(-5) M), nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) (lipoxygenase inhibitor: 10(-5), 3 x 10(-5) M), indomethacin (nonspecific cyclooxygenase inhibitor: 10(-5) M), AA-861 (5-lipoxygenase inhibitor: 10(-5), 5 x 10(-5) M), fluconazole (cytochrome P450 epoxygenase inhibitor: 10(-5) M), verapamil (10(-5) M), or calcium-free solution; and 3) endothelium-intact rings pretreated with N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (nitric oxide synthase inhibitor: 5 x 10(-5) M), indomethacin, or fluconazole."( The direct effect of levobupivacaine in isolated rat aorta involves lipoxygenase pathway activation and endothelial nitric oxide release.
Choi, YS; Hah, YS; Hwang, EM; Jeong, YS; Lee, SH; Ok, SH; Park, JY; Shin, IW; Sohn, JT, 2010
)
1.06
"To observe the motor and sensorial block characteristics with different dosage of levobupivacaine during spinal block for the patients undergoing day-case knee arthroscopy."( Comparison of the effects of intrathecal different dosage of levobupivacaine in elective day-case arthroscopy of the knee.
Mehmet, Y; Mustafa, A; Onur, O; Sibel, AM, 2010
)
0.83
"This prospective randomized double-blind dose-response study aimed to determine the ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with morphine and sufentanil for elective Caesarean delivery."( ED₅₀ and ED₉₅ of intrathecal levobupivacaine with opioids for Caesarean delivery.
Allaouchiche, B; Boselli, E; Bouvet, L; Chassard, D; Da-Col, X; Daléry, F; Dantony, E; Ruynat, L, 2011
)
0.87
" We investigated the effect of the addition of clonidine to the MLAC of levobupivacaine in a randomized controlled dose-response trial."( Effect of epidural clonidine on minimum local anesthetic concentration (ED50) of levobupivacaine for caudal block in children.
Alberighi, OD; Disma, N; Frawley, G; Mameli, L; Montobbio, G; Pistorio, A; Tuo, P, 2011
)
0.83
"The presence of cases of subtotal anaesthetic coverage (with necessity to recur to general anaesthesia), and others with good anaesthetic coverage, but difficultly treatable hypotensions show that the best dosage of these local anaesthetics is to be found yet."( [Ropivacaina 0.5% vs Levobupivacaina 0.5 endoscopic urological surgery].
Baldini, C; Fasciolo, A,
)
0.13
"In order to reduce postoperative opioid requirement, extrapleural local anaesthetic infusion dosing recommendations and guidelines for extrapleural catheter insertion were developed in our institution for 'extubatable' neonates requiring short-gap neonatal tracheo-oesophageal fistula/oesophageal atresia repair (via thoracotomy) and audited prospectively."( Audit of extrapleural local anaesthetic infusion in neonates following repair of tracheo-oesophageal fistulae and oesophageal atresia via thoracotomy.
Chalkiadis, GA; Clarnette, TD; Dowden, SJ; McNally, CM; Palmer, GM; Penrose, S; Smith, KR; Thalayasingam, P; Tingay, DG, 2012
)
0.38
" Hyperbaric levobupivacaine seems to be suitable, but the optimal dosage needs further investigation."( Clinical characteristics of spinal levobupivacaine: hyperbaric compared with isobaric solution.
Chompubai, P; Permpolprasert, L; Sanansilp, V; Suksopee, P; Trivate, T; Visalyaputra, S; von Bormann, B, 2012
)
1.03
"This prospective randomized single-blinded study was conducted to determine whether there were differences in consumption, demand dosing and postoperative analgesia quality between PCEA using ropivacaine and levobupivacaine."( The effectiveness of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.165% with fentanyl 2.0 miroc g/ml or levobupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2.0 micro g/ml as a method of postoperative analgesia after major orthopaedic surgery.
Misiran, KB; Yahaya, LS, 2013
)
0.79
"The optimal dosing regimens of lipid emulsion, epinephrine, or both are not yet determined in neonates in cases of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST)."( Resuscitation with lipid, epinephrine, or both in levobupivacaine-induced cardiac toxicity in newborn piglets.
Allaouchiche, B; Cejka, JC; Chassard, D; de Queiroz Siqueira, M; Heilporn, A; Leveneur, O; Musard, H; Rhondali, O, 2014
)
0.66
"The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the same dosage but different concentrations and volumes of levobupivacaine used for axillary block on the onset and intensity of the block."( Comparison of the efficacy of different concentrations and volumes of levobupivacaine in axillary brachial plexus blockade.
Izdes, S; Kanbak, O; Ozcan, E; Ozturk, L, 2014
)
0.85
"Decreasing the concentration and increasing the volume of levobupivacaine without changing its dosage prolongs the duration of analgesia, although it delays the onset and decreases the intensity of sensory and motor block in axillary block."( Comparison of the efficacy of different concentrations and volumes of levobupivacaine in axillary brachial plexus blockade.
Izdes, S; Kanbak, O; Ozcan, E; Ozturk, L, 2014
)
0.88
"In this study we compared the effect of 2 enantiomers; namely racemic preparation of bupivacaine with pure formulation of its levorotatory form levobupivacaine on the dosage requirements for general anesthesia propofol in a series of 273 patients admitted to hospital of China for nephrectomy."( The effect of L-bupivacaine on BIS levels in the maintenance doses of propofol and fentanyl during general anesthesia in Chinese people.
Cai, M; Li, X, 2014
)
0.6
" Recommendations regarding the maximum allowable doses of local anaesthetics should consider population analysis to determine safer dosage ranges."( Levobupivacaine absorption pharmacokinetics with and without epinephrine during TAP block: analysis of doses based on the associated risk of local anaesthetic toxicity.
Altermatt, FR; Araneda, A; Cortínez, LI; Corvetto, MA; Echevarría, GC; Miranda, P, 2016
)
1.88
"Levobupivacaine at a higher dosage provided longer duration of spinal anesthesia with better safety profile in sequential bilateral TKA."( Levobupivacaine vs racemic bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for sequential bilateral total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.
Chen, CK; Lau, FC; Lee, WG; Phui, VE, 2016
)
3.32
"This was a retrospective analysis of data previously collected during dose-response studies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine spinal anesthetics."( Infant spinal anesthesia: Do girls need a larger dose of local anesthetic?
Frawley, G; Huque, MH, 2017
)
0.67
"Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine are often given intrathecally for labor analgesia, but limited data are available for their dose-response properties in this context."( Dose-Response Curves for Intrathecal Bupivacaine, Levobupivacaine, and Ropivacaine Given for Labor Analgesia in Nulliparous Women.
Khaw, KS; Koo, AGP; Ng, FF; Ngan Kee, WD; Tang, SPY,
)
0.75
" Logistic sigmoidal dose-response curves were fitted to the data using nonlinear regression, and D50 values were calculated for each drug."( Dose-Response Curves for Intrathecal Bupivacaine, Levobupivacaine, and Ropivacaine Given for Labor Analgesia in Nulliparous Women.
Khaw, KS; Koo, AGP; Ng, FF; Ngan Kee, WD; Tang, SPY,
)
0.38
" However, the dosing regimen is still empirical, and the pharmacokinetic properties of levobupivacaine are not considered."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine During Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Children.
Khier, S; Mathieu, O; Menacé, C; Nolain, P; Vincent, M, 2020
)
1.07
" Visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively during rest; VAS scores at 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively during motion; the time required to reach 30 degrees straight leg elevation and 60 degrees active knee flexion; and the analgesia pump dosage at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively were recorded."( Magnesium Sulfate Combined with a Levobupivacaine Periarticular Cocktail for Analgesia in the Early Postoperative Period after Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Li, W; Liu, H; Peng, H; Wu, H; Zhang, X; Zhao, Z, 2021
)
0.9
" The accumulated dosage of acetaminophen given by postoperative day 2 was significantly higher in the Single group versus the Continuous group (55."( The Effect of Continuous Field Block through Intercostal Muscles after Atrial Septal Defect Closure via a Mini-Right Thoracotomy in Pediatric Patients.
Ishii, Y; Kishikawa, H; Miyagi, Y; Mori, K; Nitta, T; Sakamoto, A; Sasaki, T; Suzuki, K, 2021
)
0.62
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (5)

RoleDescription
local anaestheticAny member of a group of drugs that reversibly inhibit the propagation of signals along nerves. Wide variations in potency, stability, toxicity, water-solubility and duration of action determine the route used for administration, e.g. topical, intravenous, epidural or spinal block.
adrenergic antagonistAn agent that binds to but does not activate adrenergic receptors thereby blocking the actions of endogenous or exogenous adrenergic agonists.
amphiphileA surfactant molecule possessing both hydrophilic and lipophilic properties.
EC 3.1.1.8 (cholinesterase) inhibitorAn EC 3.1.1.* (carboxylic ester hydrolase) inhibitor that interferes with the action of cholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.8).
EC 3.6.3.8 (Ca(2+)-transporting ATPase) inhibitorAn EC 3.6.3.* (acid anhydride hydrolase catalysing transmembrane movement of substances) inhibitor that interferes with the action of Ca(2+)-transporting ATPase (EC 3.6.3.8).
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
1-butyl-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)piperidine-2-carboxamideA piperidinecarboxamide obtained by formal condensation of the carboxy group of N-butylpipecolic acid with the amino group of 2,6-dimethylaniline.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (1)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Levobupivacaine Action Pathway3111

Protein Targets (23)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency6.30960.001318.074339.8107AID926; AID938
cytochrome P450 2D6 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.50120.00207.533739.8107AID891
cytochrome P450 3A4 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.00000.031610.279239.8107AID884; AID885
histone acetyltransferase KAT2A isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.18960.251215.843239.8107AID504327
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit piRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit deltaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Inositol monophosphatase 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.01001.000010.475628.1838AID901
GABA theta subunitRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit epsilonRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00001.000012.224831.6228AID885
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.19640.00002.015110.0000AID625249
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)20.89300.00091.901410.0000AID576612
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (38)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
coumarin metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
isoquinoline alkaloid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of bindingCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cellular organofluorine metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by hormonePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (20)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced flavin or flavoprotein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygenCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 8,9 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 11,12 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 14,15 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
C3HC4-type RING finger domain bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (10)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
mitochondrionCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (16)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID613104Increase in membrane fluidity in DPH-labeled liposomal membrane containing 40 mol% cholesterol assessed as change in DPH fluorescence polarization at 200 uM after 5 mins by spectrofluorometry relative to control2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 19, Issue:11
Stereostructure-based differences in the interactions of cardiotoxic local anesthetics with cholesterol-containing biomimetic membranes.
AID613109Cardiotoxicity in dog assessed as free plasma concentration causing cardiovascular collapse measured after 20 mins2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 19, Issue:11
Stereostructure-based differences in the interactions of cardiotoxic local anesthetics with cholesterol-containing biomimetic membranes.
AID613105Binding affinity to DPH-labeled liposomal membrane without cholesterol assessed as increase in membrane fluidity by measuring decrease in DPH fluorescence polarization after 5 mins by spectrofluorometry2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 19, Issue:11
Stereostructure-based differences in the interactions of cardiotoxic local anesthetics with cholesterol-containing biomimetic membranes.
AID613110Increase in membrane fluidity in DPH-labeled liposomal membrane containing 20 mol% cardiolipin 45 mol% cholesterol assessed as change in DPH fluorescence polarization at 200 uM after 5 mins by spectrofluorometry relative to liposome without cardiolipin2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 19, Issue:11
Stereostructure-based differences in the interactions of cardiotoxic local anesthetics with cholesterol-containing biomimetic membranes.
AID613106Binding affinity to DPH-labeled liposomal membrane containing 5 to 45 mol% cholesterol assessed as increase in membrane fluidity by measuring decrease in DPH fluorescence polarization after 5 mins by spectrofluorometry2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 19, Issue:11
Stereostructure-based differences in the interactions of cardiotoxic local anesthetics with cholesterol-containing biomimetic membranes.
AID576612Inhibition of human ERG2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 46, Issue:2
Predicting hERG activities of compounds from their 3D structures: development and evaluation of a global descriptors based QSAR model.
AID613108Binding affinity to DPH-labeled liposomal membrane containing 20 mol% cardiolipin 40 mol% cholesterol assessed as increase in membrane fluidity by measuring decrease in DPH fluorescence polarization at 200 uM after 5 mins by spectrofluorometry2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 19, Issue:11
Stereostructure-based differences in the interactions of cardiotoxic local anesthetics with cholesterol-containing biomimetic membranes.
AID613103Cardiotoxicity in dog assessed as total plasma concentration causing cardiovascular collapse measured after 20 mins2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 19, Issue:11
Stereostructure-based differences in the interactions of cardiotoxic local anesthetics with cholesterol-containing biomimetic membranes.
AID613107Binding affinity to DPH-labeled liposomal membrane containing 40 mol% cholesterol assessed as increase in membrane fluidity by measuring decrease in DPH fluorescence polarization at 200 uM after 5 mins by spectrofluorometry2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 19, Issue:11
Stereostructure-based differences in the interactions of cardiotoxic local anesthetics with cholesterol-containing biomimetic membranes.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347159Primary screen GU Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347160Primary screen NINDS Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (871)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's269 (30.88)29.6817
2010's507 (58.21)24.3611
2020's95 (10.91)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 55.98

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index55.98 (24.57)
Research Supply Index7.29 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.65 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index95.39 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (55.98)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials507 (52.87%)5.53%
Reviews34 (3.55%)6.00%
Case Studies109 (11.37%)4.05%
Observational15 (1.56%)0.25%
Other294 (30.66%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (208)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Impact of Intrathecal Dexamethasone Administration for Elderly Patients With Proximal Femoral Fracture [NCT03856502]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-11Completed
A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study Comparing Three Different Anesthesic Techniques for Pregnant Women in Labour: Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural. Evaluation of the Pain Control and the Hypotension Incidence [NCT05196256]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-30Not yet recruiting
Long-term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Levobupivacaine Wound Infiltration or Diclofenac for Postoperative Pain Relief [NCT05829707]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-05Completed
MORphine Use in the Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block With UltraSound [NCT03846102]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-28Terminated(stopped due to COVID-19 crisis.)
Combined Preincisional Infiltration and Intraperitoneal Instillation of Levobupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Reduction After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Randomised Clinical Trial [NCT01199406]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarean Section: Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine [NCT03743870]250 participants (Anticipated)Observational2018-06-01Recruiting
A Double Blind Randomized Control Trial on the Efficacy of Periarticular Levo Bupivicaine Injection Following Primary Hip Arthroplasty [NCT01106001]Phase 491 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of Levobupivacaine Administration in Periprosthetic Breast Augmentation With Implants [NCT02465008]Phase 466 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalSuspended(stopped due to Not recruiting)
Clinical Characteristics of Spinal Levobupivacaine: Hyperbaric Compared With Isobaric Solution [NCT01349751]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Local Anaesthetic Wound Infiltration Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Total Knee Replacement [NCT01312415]Phase 442 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-08-31Recruiting
Volume or Concentration for the Transverse Abdominal Plane Block in Children Aged 1-5 Years: Analgesic Effects and Safety [NCT02064088]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-11-30Recruiting
Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine With or Without Fentanyl for Elective c Section. [NCT01582607]Phase 2/Phase 3130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Recruiting
[NCT02035904]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Recruiting
Selective Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Selective Sensory Spinal Anesthesia for Knee Arthroscopy Surgery [NCT01356797]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
[NCT01158586]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-04-30Recruiting
Postoperative Pain Control Using Continuous Infusion of Levobupivacaine in Women Undergoing Pelvic Operative Laparoscopy: A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT01184794]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
The Combination of PECS II Block and Parasternal Block Provide Useful Analgesia After Radical Mastectomy With Axillary Dissection and Implant Breast Reconstruction [NCT03754816]65 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-01Completed
Stimulating Catheter for Lumbar Plexus Block: Better Postoperative Analgesia? [NCT02162121]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Comparison of Zero- and Two-centimeter Distance From Sapheno-femoral Junction in Laser Ablation of Long Saphenous Vein Incompetence: Evaluating the Kissing Technique [NCT05707169]800 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-04Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial on Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Celiac Ganglion Neurolysis Versus Percutaneous Celiac Plexus Neurolysis in Patients With Inoperable Cancer [NCT02356640]Phase 2/Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor recruitment)
Comparison of Two Different Peridural During the Labor and Effect of Deambulation [NCT02264834]Phase 3164 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-01Completed
Ultrasound-guided Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block Compared to the Combined Therapy With Spermatic Cord Block in Inguinal Herniotomy Operation in Children: a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05600296]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-01Completed
Ultrasound-guided Ilioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Nerve Block Compared to Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair [NCT05559437]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-01Completed
Preoperative Paravertebral Block in Cancer Surgery of the Lung: ParaSOL a Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04209868]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-01Recruiting
Hemodynamic Safety of Isobaric Levobupivacaine Versus Isobaric Bupivacaine for Subarachnoid Anesthesia in Patients Over 65 Years Undergoing Hip Surgery [NCT03843970]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-14Recruiting
The Effect of Subcutaneous and Intraperitoneal Instillation of Local Anesthetics on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05034406]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-01Completed
Does Continuous Popliteal Nerve Block Improve Pain Management for Patients Undergoing Major Maxilla or Mandible Resection With Microvascular Reconstruction Using a Free Fibula Graft [NCT03607227]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-01Completed
The Influence of Postoperative Analgesia on Systemic Inflammatory Response and Postoperative Cognitive Disfunction in Elderly Patients After Surgical Repair of Femoral Fractures [NCT02848599]Phase 286 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Comparison Of Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAP) and Local Infiltration Analgesia During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery [NCT02185716]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Analgesic Effectiveness of the Serratus-intercostal Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block in Nephrectomy: Randomized Study [NCT04431388]120 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-06-01Recruiting
0.25% Levobupivacaine Versus 0.375% Ropivacaine: a Comparative Study in Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block [NCT03679897]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-18Completed
Intraperitoneal Instillation of Levobupivacaine in Laparoscopic Pediatric Procedures [NCT02037711]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Postoperative Analgesia Following Surgery for Fractured Neck of Femur: a Comparison of Periarticular Infiltration of Local Anaesthetic With Systemic Postoperative Analgesics [NCT02057601]37 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Intraoperative Wound Instillation of Levobupivacaine is Effective in Postoperative Pain Management for Hernia Repair in Children: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT04869046]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
A Combination of Levobupivacaine and Lidocaine for Paravertebral Block in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Quadrantectomy Causes Greater Hemodynamic Oscillations Than Levobupivacaine Alone [NCT02004834]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Active, not recruiting
The Immune Response of Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Levobupivacaine Using Paravertebral or Superficial Chest Blocks [NCT05816538]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-30Not yet recruiting
Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration Combined With Monitored Anesthesia Care for Percutaneous Nephrostomy [NCT02121951]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Withdrawn
Hemodynamic Impact of Epidural Anesthesia in Relation to Age in Pediatric Patients. [NCT05543824]15 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-09-12Recruiting
Comparison of the Efficacy of 3 Different Density Levobupivacaine Solutions + Fentanyl Applied Intrathecally for Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarean Delivery. [NCT03956303]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
The Analgesic Effect of Qudratus Lomborum Block II Type After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. [NCT03941899]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-06Completed
Continuous Infusion Versus Automated Intermittent Bolus of Levobupivacaine 0,1% in Ultrasound Guided Subparaneural Sciatic Nerve Catheters. A Prospective Double Blind Randomised Study. [NCT02293330]Phase 471 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
An Analysis of Photoplethysmographic Signal in Diagnostic Lumbar Sympathetic Block for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome [NCT01134289]Phase 325 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Recruiting
Peritonsillar Infiltration With Levobupivacaine for Relief of Posttonsillectomy Pain: Does Concentration Have Any Effect? [NCT02322346]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Double Blind Randomised Control Trial Assessing Effects of Local Anaesthetic Concentration (0.5% vs 0.75%) and Volume (5mls vs 15mls) on the Respiratory Consequences of Ultrasound Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Nerve Block [NCT01374464]Phase 492 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Not yet recruiting
Ropivacaine 0.75% Versus Levobupivacaine 0.5% for Conversion of Labour Epidural to Surgical Anaesthesia for Emergency Caesarean Section. [NCT01160965]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Not able provide staff for recruting at present)
Comparison of Caudal Blockade and Dorsal Penile Nerve Block With and Without the Intravenous Administration of Dexamethasone for Analgesia After Paediatric Male Circumcision: a Single Centre Randomized-controlled Trial [NCT05598255]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-01Recruiting
Comparison of Intra-Peritoneal Instillation of Levobupivacaine With Morphine Hydrochloride Versus Levobupivacaine With Magnesium Sulfate for Post-Operative Pain Relief After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT05281081]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-01Completed
Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Replacement: a Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Periarticular Infiltration of Local Anaesthetic With Intrathecal Morphine. [NCT01312077]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-10-31Recruiting
Local Infiltration Analgesia During Total Knee Arthroplasty - Reduced Opiate Consumption and Faster Mobilisation Postoperatively - Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01305733]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Active, not recruiting
Comparative Study Between Preemptive and Postoperative Intra-articualr Injection of Levobupivacaine and Tramadol [NCT03785041]220 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-21Completed
The Influence of Different Degrees of Levobupivacaine Temperature on Spinal Anesthesia in Orthopedic Surgeries: Prospective Randomized Study [NCT03790163]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-15Not yet recruiting
Interest of the Injection of Morphine, in Addition to a Local Anesthetic When Performing a Combined Spinal-epidural for Labor Analgesia [NCT02868944]Phase 3144 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Evaluation Of The Efficacy Of A Bolus Infiltration Of The Anaesthetic Tramadol Associated With Continuous Local Anaesthesia Administered Via A Wound Catheter Following Heart Surgery Via Sternotomy At Dijon Chu Single-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomized, Cont [NCT02851394]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
The Use of Fentanyl in General Anesthesia for Craniotomy With or Without 0.5% Levobupivacaine Scalp Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02558569]Phase 4128 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Levobupivacaine and Epinephrine for Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block for Cesarean Section Postoperative Analgesia [NCT02852720]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-15Completed
A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of a Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. [NCT00830089]66 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Levobupivacaine 0.125% vs Ropivacaine 0.2%, in Hemodynamic Alterations in Pregnant Women in Labor and Their Fetal Repercussions [NCT05877131]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Not yet recruiting
Comparing the Effects of Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine in Anorectal Surgery Under Saddle Spinal Anesthesia [NCT04245774]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-21Completed
Postoperative Pain and Systemic Inflammatory Stress Response (SIRS) After Preoperative Analgesia With Clonidine or Levobupivacaine [NCT00860899]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
The Effect of Local Anesthetic and Clonidine on the Cutaneous Silent Period During and After Spinal Anesthesia [NCT03121261]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-05-01Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures Comparing Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block to Systemic Opioids and Its Effect on Delirium Occurrence [NCT02689024]Phase 4239 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Terminated(stopped due to recruitment too slow; intervention was standard care in patients who were not included; acute care pathways changed due to policy regarding hip fracture patients)
Interest of Serratus Plane Block in Postoperative Analgesia for Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Mitral Valve Repair, MIDCAB or Partial Lung Resection [NCT03110120]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Comparative Evaluation of Newer Congeners i.e. Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine With Bupivacaine, in Lumbar Epidural Anaesthesia for Hip Surgeries [NCT02513433]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Ultrasound-Guided Versus Conventional Injection for Caudal Block in Children [NCT03337191]134 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-01Completed
Total Knee Arthroplasty & Outcome: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block [NCT02082067]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Withdrawn
Analgesic Efficacy of Single-shot Adductor Canal Block With Levobupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04968392]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Completed
Diaphragmatic Paralysis After Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Unicenter and Controlled Clinical Trial to Reduce the Dose of Levobupivacaine 0,25% 20 ml to 10 ml Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery [NCT04385966]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-11Completed
Efficacy of Adrenaline in Periarticular Analgesic Injection on Postoperative Pain Control After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03549221]Phase 282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-26Recruiting
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block Versus Spinal Block With Levobupivacaine for Inguinal Hernia in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05117281]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-10Completed
A Dose Finding Study for Ultrasound Guided Anterior Psoas Compartment Blocks in Patients With a Fractured Neck of Femur? [NCT00926666]Phase 448 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Not yet recruiting
"Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Pain Relieve in Children Undergoing Inguinal Surgical Procedures: How Does it Compare With the Gold Standard Caudal Blockade" [NCT00970086]Phase 422 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Groin surgery was changed to a laparoscopic technique; recruitable patients ceased.)
[NCT02555423]0 participants Interventional2015-10-31Not yet recruiting
Comparing Two Peripheral Nerve Block Techniques for Perioperative Analgesia During Cleft Palate Surgery in Pediatric Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04467463]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-01Recruiting
TAP Block Versus Local Anesthesia Infiltration at Wound Site for Postoperative Pain Relief After Laparoscopic Appendicectomy in Children [NCT04969133]110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-30Recruiting
EVALUATION OF ORAL USE OF DEXKETOPROFEN/TRAMADOL IN ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT WITH A MINIMALLY INVASIVE ANTERIOR APPROACH (AMIS). [NCT04178109]Phase 2226 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-10Completed
Local Continuous Wound Infusion and Local Infusion of Anaesthetics in the Management of Post-operative Pain and Rehabilitation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT02728310]Phase 396 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Terminated)
Analgesia Postoperatoria Mediante Catetere Perdurare e Analgesia Postoperatoria Mediante Infusione Continua Periferia Nell'Intervento Chirurgico Per Riparazione Chirurgica di Aneurismi Dell'Aorta Addominale: Tecniche a Confronto [NCT02677532]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
[NCT02802683]Phase 472 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Tramadol Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine Under Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block of Forearm Fractures [NCT04551833]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Not yet recruiting
Pharmacokinetic of levobupivacaïne After Sciatic Nerve Block in Children [NCT00682344]Phase 37 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Terminated
Efficacy of Adding Tramadol as Adjunctive Analgesic With Levobupivacaine in Modified Pectoral Nerve Block for Modified Radical Mastectomy Surgery [NCT02625506]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-01Completed
Thoracic Paravertebral Block Versus Pectoral Nerves Block (Modified PECS) Block in Breast Surgery [NCT02677571]55 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of General Anesthesia With Caudal Block for Inguinal Hernioplasty in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05958589]Phase 370 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-08Recruiting
Comparing General Anesthesia With Single Injection Peribulbar Block With Articaine 4% vs Lidocaine 2% vs Mepivacaine 3 % for Prevention of Oculocardiac Reflex in Children Undergoing Strabismus Surgery : A Randomized Control Study [NCT05728151]55 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-12Recruiting
A Randomised Multi-centre Feasibility Study Investigating Post-operative Pain Following Single-port or Multi-port Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgical (VATS) Procedures [NCT02556970]0 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Study never started and was abandoned.)
Comparison of TAP Block With Two Different Doses of Levobupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Management in Pediatric Patients [NCT02567487]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Active, not recruiting
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Third Trimester Medical Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia : a Randomized Study. [NCT02563821]Phase 337 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-05Completed
Levobupivacïne Into Post-analgesia : Randomized Monocentric Study Against Placebo [NCT00621907]Phase 3140 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Colostomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02691403]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Not yet recruiting
The Comparison of Intrathecal Bupivacaine With Fentanyl and Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl for Labour Analgesia [NCT04221568]Phase 170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-01Not yet recruiting
Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Levobupivacaine 0.5% Via Interscalene Nerve Block or Via Interscalene Nerve Block Combined With a Stellate Ganglion Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy With General Anaesthesia [NCT02879916]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Blockade With Levobupivacaine and Clonidine on Chronic Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis [NCT02695654]77 participants (Actual)Observational2015-11-30Completed
The Analgesic Efficacy of Erector -Spinae Technique With Levobupvicaine in Patients Undergoing Upper Abdominal Cancer Surgery [NCT04315454]Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-01Recruiting
Optimal Volume of Bupivacaine in Adductor Canal Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery [NCT02557386]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
Ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in the Management of Acute Postoperative Pain Syndrome After Caesarean Section: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT02728323]Phase 396 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated)
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block and Local Anaesthetic Infiltration for Pain Control Following Hip Arthroscopic Surgery [NCT02702661]46 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Comparative Study of the Effects of Two Local Anesthetics Administered Intrathecally: 0.5% Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine 0.5% [NCT01935596]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Effects of Intraperitoneal Levobupivacaine on Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study [NCT00836316]Phase 440 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
Surgical Pleth Index - Relevance in Small Children. A Randomised Double Blinded Study [NCT02045810]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine on Heart Rate Variability in Spinal Anesthesia [NCT00974961]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Recruiting
Large-scale Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Pecs II Block for Breast Surgery: Effect on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption [NCT02544282]Phase 4140 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Using Levo-bupivacaine Alone or Combined With Dexmedetomidine for Hand and Forearm Surgeries [NCT04729868]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-01Completed
Role of Dexmedetomidine or Fentanyl as Additives to Epidural Levobupivacaine in Painless Labor: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04397406]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-01Completed
Comparison Between Levobupivacaine 0.25% and Levobupivacaine With Dexmedetomidine in Ultrasound Guided Modified Pectoral Nerve Block, a Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial. [NCT03456661]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-19Terminated(stopped due to The surgical approach has changed.)
Intraperitoneal Atomization of Levobupivacaine During Gynaecological Laparoscopic Procedures ; Impact on Pain, Opioid Use and Length of Recovery Room Stay (IPLA). [NCT01886352]Phase 416 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-26Completed
The Effect of Addition of Tramadol to Levobupivacaine in Continuous Wound Infusion for Postoperative Pain Treatment in Cesarean Section [NCT01916915]Phase 465 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Intra-articular Dexmedetomidine Adding to Levobupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Arthroscopic Knee Surgery [NCT01918917]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
[NCT01938755]Phase 473 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Bupivacaine or Levobupivacaine on Cerebral Oxygenation During Intrathecal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Who Underwent Hip Fracture Repair [NCT01960543]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
The Assessment of Bupivacaine-tramadol and Levobupivacaine-tramadol Combinations for Preemptive Caudal Anaesthesia in Children: a Randomized, Double-blind, Prospective Study [NCT01974843]68 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2011-01-31Completed
Can we Gain an Advantage by Combining Distal Median, Radial and Ulnar Nerve Blocks With Supraclavicular Block? A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT01989312]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Does Saphenous Nerve Block Improve Analgesia After Total Knee Replacement When Used in Combination With Local Infiltration Analgesia? A Prospective Randomised Double Blinded Trial. [NCT01991288]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Study Phase III to Evaluate the Noninferiority of Heavy Levobupivacaine 50% Enantiomeric Excess (Levobupivacaine S75:R25) Compared to Racemic Heavy Bupivacaine (Bupivacaine S50:R50) in Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopedic Procedures [NCT01994967]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Another regulatory way was defined.)
Quadratus Lumborum Type 2 as Chronic Hip Pain Treatment [NCT04438265]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2020-09-01Recruiting
Intravenous Versus Perineural Dexamethasone in Interscalene Nerve Block With Levobupivacaine for Shoulder and Upper Arm Surgeries [NCT04284007]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-02Enrolling by invitation
The Comparison of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Plus Fentanyl and Hyperbaric Levobupivacaine Plus Fentanyl Administered Intrathecally in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section [NCT02025374]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Interest in Clonidine in Association With Levobupivacaine Performing a Pudendal Block in Proctological Surgery: Pilot Study, Prospective [NCT04530903]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-09Recruiting
Comparison of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Parasternal Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Cardiac Surgery [NCT02725229]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Pain Management During Labor: Use of Intermittent Drug Delivery Devices for Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Improvement and Health-care Burden Reduction [NCT02710877]671 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-23Terminated(stopped due to Stopped funding by Regional Healthcare System.)
Adding Magnesium Sulphate to Epidural Levobupivacaine in Elective Caesarian Section for Patients With Preeclampsia [NCT02699827]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Comparison of Two Methods of Administration of the Epidural, by Programmed Intermittent Bolus or Continuous Perfusion, on the Incidence of Cesarean Sections and Instrumented Deliveries in Primiparous Women [NCT02705872]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-08Withdrawn(stopped due to Change in guidelines)
Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of the Local Anesthetics Ropicacaine, Levobupivacaine, and Levobupivacaine + Epinephrin Via Interscalene Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy Under General Anesthesia [NCT02691442]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Epidural Levobupivacaine Versus A Combination of Levobupivacaine and Dexamethasone in Parturients Receiving Epidural for Vaginal Delivery Analgesia: A Comparative, Dose Ranging and Safety Evaluation Study [NCT02665936]Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Active, not recruiting
Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Comparison of Isolated Intravenous Analgesia, Epidural Analgesia Associated With Analgesia iv and Port-sites Infiltration With Bupivacaine Associated With Analgesia iv [NCT02662660]Phase 3147 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine Versus Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuvants to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound (US) Bi-level Erector Spinae Block in Breast Cancer Surgery [NCT04275661]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-01Active, not recruiting
Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial on the Effect of Levobupivacaine Infiltration Versus Placebo on the Post Partum Perineal Pain in Episiotomy in Primiparous Women After Instrumental Delivery [NCT02796547]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-14Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of human ressources)
Efficacy of Rectal Sheath Analgesia After Midline Laparotomy [NCT02869841]Phase 457 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Intra-operative Trigeminal Nerve Block For Post-operative Pain Control After Orthognathic Surgery [NCT01418183]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Recruiting
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With PECS II Block in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery:a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03811262]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Logistic reasons (Operating room performing the surgery investigated moved to another structure))
Intrathecal Levobupivacaine Versus A Combination of Levobupivacaine and Dexamethasone in Parturients Receiving Combined Spinal Epidural for Vaginal Delivery Analgesia: A Comparative Study. [NCT02588417]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Comparison of the Efficacy of the Ultrasound With Fluoroscopy in Guidance of Lumbar Sympathetic Block: A Prospective Randomized Open-label Trial [NCT02737527]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Recruiting
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Coupled With PCEA (PIEB-PCEA) Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion Coupled With PCEA (CEI-PCEA) for Labor Analgesia in Nulliparous: Effects on Labor Outcomes [NCT01856166]300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-06-30Recruiting
Comparison of Intrathecal Levobupivacaine Combined With Sufentanil, Fentanyl, or Placebo for Elective Caesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study [NCT01858090]Phase 393 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
High Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia and Postoperative Analgesia With Ropivacaine or Levobupivacaine for Coronary Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Comparison [NCT00552864]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Effect of Fentanyl With Topical Levobupivacaine With Nasal Packing in Endoscopic Nasal Surgery [NCT04410588]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-20Recruiting
The Cardio-pulmonary and Analgesic Effects of Pre-peritoneal Infusion VS Epidural Infusion of Levo - Bupivacaine on Patients Undergoing Major Upper Abdominal Cancer Surgery [NCT04152564]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-29Completed
Does Saline Injection Around Phrenic Nerve Reduce Incidence of Diaphragmatic Paresis Following Interscalene Block? [NCT02893228]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
Post Tonsillectomy Analgesia Comparison After Surgery Site Spray of NaCl 0,9%, Xylocaine 2% or Levobupivacaine 0,5% [NCT04325113]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-07Completed
Effect of Topically Administered Levobupivacaine- Fentanyl Versus Levobupivacaine- Dexamethasone Combination in the Control of Pain After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05145543]Phase 2/Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Recruiting
Comparative Study Between Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine for Nerve Block During Pediatric Primary Cleft Palate Surgery [NCT02923869]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Contribution of the Local Infiltration of Chirocaine® in the Management of the Post-partum Perineal Pain After Episiotomy or First-degree Tear [NCT02905695]Phase 4110 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
The Effects of Levobupivacaine Versus Levobupivacaine Plus Dexmedetomidine Infiltration for Post-tonsillectomy Analgesia and Laryngospasm in Pediatric Patients [NCT04113720]Phase 1/Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-15Completed
Addition of Lidocaine to Levobupivacaine Reduces Intrathecal Block Duration: Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01675895]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
[NCT00956709]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Terminated
Comparison of Dexmetomidine's Efficacy as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Levobupivacaine and Intravenous Administration Additionally to Spinal Anaesthesia, In Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT02966249]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
Adductor Canal Block Versus Intra-articular Analgesia for Postoperative Pain After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Randomized Trial [NCT04715152]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-13Recruiting
Selective Trunk Block Versus Hybrid Interscalene-Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Anaesthesia of the Entire Upper Extremity: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial [NCT04908371]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Published data indicated Selective Trunk Block is a better choice)
Postoperative Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Super Obese Patients (~BMI 60 kg m-2) Undergoing Open Weight Loss Surgery :Does the Addition of Morphine to 0.1% and 0.2% Levobupivacaine Affect Postoperative Pain Relief, Perioperative Lung Function, Return of [NCT01249872]Phase 2/Phase 396 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Epidural Analgesia During Labour. Impact of Clonidine Addition to Levobupivacaine and Sufentanil [NCT00437996]Phase 385 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Minimum Effective Local Anesthetic Volume of 0.5% Levobupivacaine Required for Ultrasound Guided Superior Trunk Block for Shoulder Surgery [NCT04941664]25 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-19Recruiting
A Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Effects of Lidocaine and Levobupivacaine on Block Dynamics After a Subparaneural Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block [NCT04397484]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-20Recruiting
Effect of a Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Operative Wound Healing, Stress, and Immune Response After a Cesarean Delivery [NCT05840406]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-04-01Not yet recruiting
Laparoscopically Inserted Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Wound Local Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Endometriosis Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Double-blinded LTAP-trial [NCT04735770]46 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-01Recruiting
A Randomised Single Blind Study Comparing the Molar Median Effective Dose of Levobupivacaine and Molar Median Effective Dose of Ropivacaine When Administered as a Femoral Perineural Infusion for Pain Relief After Total Knee Replacement [NCT01172197]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated prior to its planned completion as anticipated by the protocol).)
Spinal Anesthesia With Hyperbaric Levobupivacaine 0.75% for Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopy: A Double Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Three Low Doses [NCT01881087]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Evaluation of Perineural Catheterization Practices in Postoperative Orthopedic Surgery [NCT04011839]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-06-07Recruiting
Decision Support for Intraoperative Low Blood Pressure [NCT02726620]22,435 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-05Completed
Efficacy of Adding Ketamine to Levobupivacaine in Paravertebral Block on Acute and Chronic Pain in Thoracotomy: a Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Trial [NCT06011746]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-30Recruiting
Comparison of Intratechal Low-Dose Levobupivacaine With Levobupivacaine-Fentanyl and Levobupivacaine-Sufentanil Combinations for Cesarean Section [NCT02430090]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Ultra-sound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plan Block in Pediatric Abdominal Cancer Surgery [NCT03979599]Phase 310 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-15Recruiting
Prevention of Systemic Toxicity Induced by Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine by Intralipid® [NCT01602250]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Rotator Cuff Repair Under Isolated Loco-regional Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia Combined With Loco-regional Anesthesia: Randomized Controlled Trial of Superiority. [NCT05848375]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-13Recruiting
Influence of Anesthetic Volume on Comfort Score During US-SCB Placement in Elderly Patients [NCT01624103]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-11-30Recruiting
Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Caudal Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Supplementation of Caudal Analgesia in Children [NCT01701778]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia Versus Local Infiltration Analgesia Following Knee Arthroplasty Within an Enhanced Recovery Programme - a Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT02478372]242 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Comparison of Two Techniques of Ultrasound-guided Sciatic Nerve Block Using Levobupivacaine 0.5% in Orthopedic Surgery at the Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe - Clínica CES, 2013, Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01734954]66 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-04-30Not yet recruiting
Interest of a Bi-truncal Nerve Block (Femoral + Sciatic) Extended, Systematically Associated With General Anesthesia, in the Femoropopliteal Bypass: Study of Post-operative Analgesia and Peripheral Circulation Downstream. [NCT01785693]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-30Completed
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Second Trimester Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy Analgesia: a Randomized Study. [NCT01860521]104 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuncts to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy, Randomized Double-Blinded Comparative Study. [NCT05447949]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-15Completed
Echo-guided Transverse Abdominal Plane Block (TAP) in Anterior Lumbar Arthrodesis (ALIF): Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial. [NCT06002217]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Continuous Infusion of Levobupivacaine to the Surgical Wound Following Cesarean [NCT01458431]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
Effects of Age on Minimum Effective Volume of Local Anesthetic for Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block (US-SCB) [NCT01467596]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Use of Infiltration With Levobupivacaine and Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04697329]Phase 4233 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-03Completed
The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Peroperative Shivering Incidence Under Spinal Anesthesia [NCT01921361]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Ultrasound-guided Subpectoral Plexus Block With Multi-level Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Surgical Anaesthesia During Primary Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double-blind Trial [NCT04933266]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
Randomized and Controlled Phase IV Clinical Trial on the Analgesic Effectiveness of the Combined Blockade (Peng - Pericapsular Nerve Group- and the Femoral Lateral Cutaneous Nerve) in the Hip Fractures of the Elderly: Comparative Study Between Levobupivac [NCT04773301]Phase 4108 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-13Recruiting
Intraluminal Ureteric Injection of High Concentration Alkalinised Long-acting Local Anaesthetic and STeroid Post urEteroscopy: A Prospective Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial (LASTE Trial) [NCT03296189]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-01Not yet recruiting
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Levobupivacaine With and Without Epinephrine After Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block [NCT04799184]Phase 438 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-04-03Recruiting
Assessment of Sensory and Motor Block After Intrathecal Administration of Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine Combined With Small Doses of Fentanyl, Followed by Administration of Normal Saline Epidurally:a Clinical Trial in Parturients Scheduled [NCT01558713]Phase 2/Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Recruiting
Comparison of Plasma Concentrations of Levobupivacaine With and Without Epinephrine for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Under Ultrasound. [NCT01596998]Phase 411 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Postoperative Analgesic Effect Of Dexmedetomidine Administration in Wound Infiltration For Total Abdominal Hysterectomy [NCT01929252]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Periarticular Single Anesthetic Drug Compared With Multimodal Drug Injection in Controlling Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01898052]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Local Wound Infiltration With 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. [NCT03433014]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-31Completed
Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Minimal Invasive Cardiac Surgery: a Single Center Randomized-controlled Trial [NCT05107453]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-28Completed
Local Wound Anesthesia in Spine Surgery - a Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial [NCT05693454]150 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-01Completed
Effects of Scalp Block With Bupivacaine Versus Levobupivacaine on Haemodynamic Response to Head Pinning and Efficacy on Postoperative Analgesia [NCT02497040]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Comparative Study Between Levobupivacaine 0.5% and Ropivacaine 0.75% in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery. [NCT02201784]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Addition of Dexmedetomidine to Levobupivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery: Could it Make a Difference? [NCT04971759]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-01Completed
The Effect of Retrobulbar Block on Bi-Hemispheric Cerebral Oxygen Saturation and Early Period Postoperative Cognitive Functions With Lidocaine and Levobupivacaine in Elderly Patients With Ophthalmic Surgery [NCT03189329]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Intrathecal Anesthesia for Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery Lasting >45 Minutes: A Randomized, Controlled, Dose and Combination Finding Study [NCT02385539]240 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
The Impact of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in the Management of Acute and Chronic Post-Thoracotomy Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Study [NCT04531553]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-03Completed
Evaluation of Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament by One Night Hospital Stay or by Day Surgery: a Randomised, Prospective Clinical Trial [NCT00620477]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-30Completed
Gonyautoxins Local Periarticular Injection for Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double Blind Randomized Study [NCT03025594]Phase 364 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Trial of the Efficacy of a Bilateral Lumbar Erector Spinae Block on the 24h Morphine Consumption After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery. [NCT03825198]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-01Recruiting
Hip Arthroscopy; Femoral Nerve Block or Fascia Iliaca Block: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT05010499]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-28Recruiting
Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery: A Prospective Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05532618]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-01Completed
Evaluation of Multimodal Preemptive Analgesia in Major Pediatric Abdominal Cancer Surgeries [NCT03580980]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-01Completed
Dexmedetomidine Versus Clonidine Adjuvants to Levobupivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Pediatric Laparoscopic Orcheopexy: Randomized Double-blind Study [NCT03155646]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-10Completed
Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl Added to Levobupivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery [NCT03778671]Phase 1/Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
The Effects of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on Hip Fracture Patients [NCT04837924]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-21Completed
Levobupivacaine Versus Levobupivacaine - Dexmedetomidine for Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Upper Tracheal Resection and Reconstruction Surgery Under General Anesthesia [NCT03426527]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-01Completed
Laparoscopic Guided Regional Analgesia (LaGRA) Reduces Post Operative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - a Randomised, Controlled Trial. [NCT03394807]Phase 476 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-01Completed
Minimum Effective Local Anaesthetic Volume of a 1:1 Mixture of 2% Lidocaine With 5ug/ml of Epinephrine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine Required for Ultrasound Guided Selective Trunk Block: A Dose Finding Study [NCT04773405]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-10Completed
Effectiveness of Distal Peripheral Nerve Blocks on Postoperative Pain Management After Ambulatory Thumb Resection Arthroplasty. [NCT01597479]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
The Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia TAP-block After Caesarean Section [NCT03302689]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-25Active, not recruiting
The Pharmacokinetics and Effectiveness of Different Methods of Local LevoBupivacaine Injection, a Prospective Randomized Case Control Clinical Study on Primary Total Joint Replacement Model. [NCT03258697]180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-17Enrolling by invitation
A Prospective, Randomised Double Blinded Study Comparing a Pectoral Nerve Block With Non-targeted Local Anaesthetic in Bilateral Breast Surgery [NCT02410746]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
Contribution Of Anesthesia Technique For Post-operative Mortality Reduction After Proximal Femur Fractures Surgical Treatment - A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02406300]57 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-01Terminated(stopped due to Organizational changes made recruitment no longer possible)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00956709 (3) [back to overview]Compare the Onset of Action of Ropivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaïne 0.5 % for Sciatic Nerve Block Guided in Major Surgery of the Foot
NCT00956709 (3) [back to overview]Duration of Motor Sciatic Block (h)
NCT00956709 (3) [back to overview]Duration of Sensory Sciatic Block (h)
NCT01172197 (1) [back to overview]Pain
NCT01249872 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain Scores (Visual Analogue Scale)
NCT01249872 (6) [back to overview]Time to Postoperative Bowel Recovery
NCT01249872 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline of Spirometric Values
NCT01249872 (6) [back to overview]Consumption of Levobupivacaine at 24h and 48 h Postoperatively
NCT01249872 (6) [back to overview]Cumulative Consumption of Epidural Morphine at 24h and 48h Postoperatively
NCT01249872 (6) [back to overview]Time to First Postoperative Ambulation
NCT01597479 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Pain Intensity, Rescue Analgesia, Nausea and Vomiting Incidence, Use of Ondansetron for NVPO, Efectiveness of Ondansetron
NCT01597479 (2) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Who Experienced Moderate to Severe Pain During First and Second Postoperative Day
NCT01860521 (4) [back to overview]Total Sufentanil Consumption.
NCT01860521 (4) [back to overview]Total Levobupivacaine Consumption
NCT01860521 (4) [back to overview]Degree of Satisfaction of the Patients With the Analgesia Procedure
NCT01860521 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Motor Block
NCT01881087 (2) [back to overview]Failed Spinal Block Rate
NCT01881087 (2) [back to overview]Probability of Motor Block
NCT02201784 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Analgesia
NCT02201784 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Motor Block
NCT02201784 (5) [back to overview]Onset of Motor Block to Bromage3
NCT02201784 (5) [back to overview]Onset of Sensory Block at T10
NCT02201784 (5) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Cephalic Spread of Sensory Block
NCT02430090 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
NCT02478372 (9) [back to overview]Day of Ambulation
NCT02478372 (9) [back to overview]Patient Reported Outcome Measure - Oxford Knee Score
NCT02478372 (9) [back to overview]Total Number of Reported Participants With Complications and/or Adverse Events
NCT02478372 (9) [back to overview]Verbal Rating Score (VRS) Pain Scores
NCT02478372 (9) [back to overview]Maximal Flexion Angle of the Operative Knee at Discharge From Rehabilitation
NCT02478372 (9) [back to overview]Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting Scores
NCT02478372 (9) [back to overview]Post-operative Urinary Catheterisation Rates
NCT02478372 (9) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Discharged From Rehabilitation by Day Four
NCT02478372 (9) [back to overview]Average Post-operative Length of Stay
NCT02497040 (1) [back to overview]Change in Mean Arterial Pressure
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg for > 20 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg for > 10 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg for > 20 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg for > 10 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg for > 20 Minutes
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Epinephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 55 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 65 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Postoperative Rise in Creatinine Levels
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Time to Discharge Readiness at the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 55 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 65 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephedrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephinephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Glycopyrrolate
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Norepinephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Phenylephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 55 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 65 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]30-day Mortality
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephedrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Glycopyrrolate
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Norepinephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Phenylephrine
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Intraoperative Administration of Intravenous Fluids
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 55 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 60 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 65 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 70 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 75 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Estimated Intraoperative Blood Loss
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]In-hospital Mortality
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg
NCT02726620 (43) [back to overview]Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg for > 10 Minutes
NCT02848599 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Cognitive Function
NCT02848599 (6) [back to overview]Changes in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
NCT02848599 (6) [back to overview]Postoperative Hospital Stay
NCT02848599 (6) [back to overview]Interleukin-6 Concentration in Peripheral Blood.
NCT02848599 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Pain Intensity
NCT02848599 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Fibrinogen Concentrations in Peripheral Blood

Compare the Onset of Action of Ropivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaïne 0.5 % for Sciatic Nerve Block Guided in Major Surgery of the Foot

(NCT00956709)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Levobupivacaïne 0,5 %40
Ropivacaïne 0,5%35

[back to top]

Duration of Motor Sciatic Block (h)

(NCT00956709)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Levobupivacaïne 0,5 %15.54
Ropivacaïne 0,5%15.17

[back to top]

Duration of Sensory Sciatic Block (h)

(NCT00956709)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Levobupivacaïne 0,5 %17.25
Ropivacaïne 0,5%15.00

[back to top]

Pain

Number achieving pain on movement of knee measured as 0 on a verbal pain rating scale at 30h after start of perineural infusion (NCT01172197)
Timeframe: 30 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ropivacaine7
Levobupivacaine7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain Scores (Visual Analogue Scale)

Pain scores at rest and on cough using a 10cm Visual Analogue Scale(0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain) were assessed up to 48h postoperatively. (NCT01249872)
Timeframe: up to 48 h postoperatively

,,,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
VAS rest at 6h postoperativelyVAS rest at 24h postoperativelyVAS rest at 48h postoperativelyVAS cough at 6h postoperativelyVAS cough at 24h postoperativelyVAS cough at 48h postoperatively
GROUP A : 0 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE1.40.10.04.72.41.3
GROUP B : 1 mg MORPHINE- 0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE1.60.40.14.22.62.4
GROUP C : 2 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE1.60.40.44.73.22.3
GROUP D : 0 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE0.80.00.03.92.01.3
GROUP E : 1 mg MORPHINE-0.2 % LEVOBUPIVACAINE1.11.80.13.93.51.4
GROUP F : 2 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE0.80.10.02.72.40.8

[back to top]

Time to Postoperative Bowel Recovery

Time to postoperative recovery of bowel function assessed by first flatus or stool, noticed by the patient (NCT01249872)
Timeframe: up to 6 days

Interventionhours (Mean)
GROUP A : 0 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE56.6
GROUP B : 1 mg MORPHINE- 0.1%LEVOBUPIVACAINE70.9
GROUP C : 2 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE67.1
GROUP D : 0 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE55.6
GROUP E : 1 mg MORPHINE-0.2 % LEVOBUPIVACAINE58.6
GROUP F : 2 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE63.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline of Spirometric Values

Preoperatively, after a detailed demonstration, baseline spirometry measurements of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were measured, using a bedside spirometer (PowerCubeΤΜ, Ganshorn Medizin Electronic, Germany), on-line connected to a PC. Spirometry was standardized with each patient in a 30o head-up position and it was performed at least three times and the best measurement was recorded, according to the criteria of the European Respiratory Society .Postoperatively, spirometric values (FVC= Forced Vital Capacity, FEV1=Forced Expiratory Volume at 1 sec , PEFR= Peak Expiratory Flow Rate)were recorded at 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 144 hours . Data are expressed as percentage of preoperative values, which are 100%. (NCT01249872)
Timeframe: up to 6th day postoperatively

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of preoperative values (Mean)
FVC at 12h postoperativelyFVC at 24h postoperativelyFVC at 36h postoperativelyFVC at 48h postoperativelyFVC at 72h postoperativelyFVC at 6th day postoperativelyFEV1 at 12h postoperativelyFEV1 at 24h postoperativelyFEV1 at 36h postoperativelyFEV1 at 48h postoperativelyFEV1 at 72h postoperativelyFEV1 at 6th day postoperativelyPEFR at 12h postoperativelyPEFR at 24h postoperativelyPEFR at 36h postoperativelyPEFR at 48h postoperativelyPEFR at 72h postoperativelyPEFR at 6th day postoperatively
GROUP A : 0 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE63.262.565.763.969.479.055.861.562.964.979.086.862.968.569.670.777.393.8
GROUP B : 1 mg MORPHINE- 0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE69.362.261.266.271.383.963.955.252.755.970.281.867.655.657.958.878.198.4
GROUP C : 2 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE68.372.165.267.676.283.160.571.061.068.275.488.061.879.968.879.791.396.4
GROUP D : 0 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE71.766.863.969.872.484.065.263.858.461.870.283.460.070.159.464.970.776.3
GROUP E : 1 mg MORPHINE-0.2 % LEVOBUPIVACAINE66.463.362.871.177.380.062.056.461.167.175.379.477.957.773.876.480.983.7
GROUP F : 2 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE66.862.663.266.976.789.262.159.859.364.972.583.867.268.967.974.386.089.6

[back to top]

Consumption of Levobupivacaine at 24h and 48 h Postoperatively

Cumulative consumption of levobupivacaine administered via patients controlled epidural analgesia pump( PCEA) at 24h and 48 h postoperatively (NCT01249872)
Timeframe: up to 48 hours postoperatively

,,,,,
Interventionmg (Mean)
Levobupivacaine consumption at 24h postoperativelyLevobupivacaine consumption at 48h postoperatively
GROUP A : 0 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE132.9189.8
GROUP B : 1 mg MORPHINE- 0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE178.8240.9
GROUP C : 2 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE165.6231.9
GROUP D : 0 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE325.7435.4
GROUP E : 1 mg MORPHINE-0.2 % LEVOBUPIVACAINE241.9351.3
GROUP F : 2 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE203.1294.7

[back to top]

Cumulative Consumption of Epidural Morphine at 24h and 48h Postoperatively

Cumulative consumption of epidural morphine administered as loading dose, intraoperatively, of 1mg(groups B and E)or 2mg (groups C and F) and as continuous infusion of 0,2mg/h ( all groups) at 24h and 48h postoperatively.All participants in each Group received the same dose of epidural morphine, as no participant missed a scheduled dose. (NCT01249872)
Timeframe: up to 48 hours postoperatively

,,,,,
Interventionmg (Mean)
Epidural morphine consumption at 24h postoperativeEpidural morphine consumption at 48h postoperative
GROUP A : 0 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE4.89.6
GROUP B : 1 mg MORPHINE- 0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE5.810.6
GROUP C : 2 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE6.811.6
GROUP D : 0 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE4.89.6
GROUP E : 1 mg MORPHINE-0.2 % LEVOBUPIVACAINE5.810.6
GROUP F : 2 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE6.811.6

[back to top]

Time to First Postoperative Ambulation

Time to being able to walk without assistance within the room or outside the room (NCT01249872)
Timeframe: up to 6 days

,,,,,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Walking in the room unassistedWalking out of the room unassisted
GROUP A : 0 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE19.033.3
GROUP B : 1 mg MORPHINE- 0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE19.947.0
GROUP C : 2 mg MORPHINE-0.1% LEVOBUPIVACAINE19.143.3
GROUP D : 0 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE20.739.5
GROUP E : 1 mg MORPHINE-0.2 % LEVOBUPIVACAINE21.443.4
GROUP F : 2 mg MORPHINE- 0.2% LEVOBUPIVACAINE20.645.1

[back to top]

Maximum Pain Intensity, Rescue Analgesia, Nausea and Vomiting Incidence, Use of Ondansetron for NVPO, Efectiveness of Ondansetron

Number of participants with Maximum pain intensity NVS > 3; Rescue analgesia; Nausea and Vomiting incidence; use of ondansetron for NVPO; Ondansetron being effective (number of participants for whom ondansetron was effective to stop NVPO). (NCT01597479)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Maximum pain intensity 24h (NVS>3)Maximum pain intensity 48h (NVS >3)Rescue analgesia 24h (n)Rescue Analgesia 48h (n)Nausea and vomiting 24h (n)Nausea and vomiting 48h (n)Use of ondansetron 24h (n)Use of ondansetron 48h (n)Effectiveness of ondansetron 24hEfectiveness of ondansetron 48h
dPNBs Group8525101010
Non dPNBs Group242117171055542

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Who Experienced Moderate to Severe Pain During First and Second Postoperative Day

Pain scores assessed using pain numerical visual scale (NVS) of 0-10 (o= no pain and 10= worst pain imaginable). We defined mild pain (NVS 0-3); moderate pain (NVS 4-6) and severe pain (NVS 7-10).The analysis of this variable at the end of the study will confirm or not the effectiveness of dPNBs for management of postoperative pain after TRA. (NCT01597479)
Timeframe: Up to 48 hours

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Pain intensity NVS>3 on call 24hPain intensity NVS>3 on call 48h
Distal Peripheral Nerve Blocks Group (dPNBs Group)8.34.2
Non Distal Peripheral Nerve Blocks (Non dPNBs Group)80.842.3

[back to top]

Total Sufentanil Consumption.

(NCT01860521)
Timeframe: During the whole analgesia procedure (assessed between the starting of the procedure until 66 hours).

Interventionmicrog (Mean)
Continuous Epidural Infusion69.0
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus60.4

[back to top]

Total Levobupivacaine Consumption

(NCT01860521)
Timeframe: At the moment of fetal expulsion (up to 66 hours from starting of the procedure).

Interventionmg (Mean)
Continuous Epidural Infusion86.2
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus75.5

[back to top]

Degree of Satisfaction of the Patients With the Analgesia Procedure

"At discharge from the hospital, patients were requested to answer the following question Taking into consideration the variations in pain symptoms, as well as the adverse events experienced, if any, how would you define the grade of satisfaction with your analgesic treatment? The grade of satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to completely unsatisfied and 100 to completely satisfied." (NCT01860521)
Timeframe: At discharge from the hospital (up to 72 hours from starting of the procedure).

Interventionmm (Mean)
Continuous Epidural Infusion73.2
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus84.4

[back to top]

Incidence of Motor Block

The assessment of the degree of motor block was performed in the right and left lower extremities using the Breen modified Bromage score: 1 = complete block (unable to move feet or knees), 2 = almost complete block (able to move feet only), 3 = partial block (just able to move knees), 4 = detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine (between scores 3 and 5), 5 = no detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine (full flexion of knees), and 6 = able to stand and to perform partial knee bend. Patients with a Bromage score < 6 were considered to have motor block. (NCT01860521)
Timeframe: Assessed every hour from starting the analgesia procedure (up to 66 hours from starting of the procedure).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Continuous Epidural Infusion24
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus3

[back to top]

Failed Spinal Block Rate

Failed Spinal Block Rate for each treatment group (NCT01881087)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after dose

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Levo-7.5 mg2
Levo-9.373
Levo-11.251

[back to top]

Probability of Motor Block

Likelihood Rate of motor block persistence after a dosis of spinal HLBP 0.75% (NCT01881087)
Timeframe: 200 minutes

Interventionpercentage of motor block (Number)
Levo-7.5 mg5
Levo-9.3720
Levo-11.2527

[back to top]

Duration of Analgesia

Defined as time for first analgesic request by the patient (NCT02201784)
Timeframe: 8 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Levobupivacaine 0.5%309.83
Ropivacaine 0.75%249.50

[back to top]

Duration of Motor Block

Time when the Bromage score will be back to zero (NCT02201784)
Timeframe: 8 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Levobupivacaine 0.5%290.50
Ropivacaine 0.75%222.50

[back to top]

Onset of Motor Block to Bromage3

Motor block in the lower limbs was graded according to the modified Bromage scale (Grade 0 = No motor block, Grade 1 = Inability to raise extended leg, able to move knees and feet, Grade 2 = Inability to raise extended leg and move knee, able to move feet, Grade 3 = Complete motor block of the lower limbs). Thereafter, It was performed every 5 minutes till the attainment of MB grade 3 followed by every 30 minutes until complete recovery (MB grade0). (NCT02201784)
Timeframe: 8 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Levobupivacaine 0.5%12.17
Ropivacaine 0.75%7.83

[back to top]

Onset of Sensory Block at T10

level of sensory block was assessed every 5 minutes till the loss of sensation to pinprick, using 22-guage hypodermic needle with 2mm protrusion through guard. Assessments continued at 30 min intervals following the completion of surgery until normal sensation returned. (NCT02201784)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Levobupivacaine 0.5%13.50
Ropivacaine 0.75%7.33

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Cephalic Spread of Sensory Block

(NCT02201784)
Timeframe: 8 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Levobupivacaine 0.5%20.33
Ropivacaine 0.75%13.17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

The frequency and the severity (ex) of the side effects including nausea and vomiting, hypotension, pruritus, and bradycardia were recorded. (NCT02430090)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Levobupivacaine5
Levobupivacaine + Fentanyl10
Levobupivacaine + Sufentanil9

[back to top]

Day of Ambulation

Proportion of patients per day to ambulate for the first time with the physiotherapist > 3 Metres (NCT02478372)
Timeframe: theatre day, day 1 post-surgery, day two post-surgery

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Theatre DayPost-operative day onePost-operative day two
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)51490
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA)35654

[back to top]

Patient Reported Outcome Measure - Oxford Knee Score

Units measured on old Oxford Score (12-60) from a 12 point questionnaire. Where in 60 is poor and lower scores are better patient reported outcome scores (NCT02478372)
Timeframe: one week prior to surgery, 6 weeks post-surgery , one year post-surgery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Pre-operative Oxford ScoreSix week follow up scoreOne year Follow up score
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)432619
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA)432819

[back to top]

Total Number of Reported Participants With Complications and/or Adverse Events

The composite number of adverse events reported per group at 30 days and then one year post surgery (NCT02478372)
Timeframe: 30 days and one year post-surgery

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Reported complications at 30 daysReported complications at one year
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)24
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA)02

[back to top]

Verbal Rating Score (VRS) Pain Scores

Summary 24 hour Verbal rated numerical pain scores were gathered each day. Scale range 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain (NCT02478372)
Timeframe: 24hours, 48 hours and 72 hours post-surgery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Theatre Day( asked at 24 hrs)Post-operative day one( asked at 48hrs)Post-operative day two(asked 72 hrs)
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)344
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA)333

[back to top]

Maximal Flexion Angle of the Operative Knee at Discharge From Rehabilitation

(NCT02478372)
Timeframe: On day of discharge from rehabilitation in-patient care (average 96 hours post surgery)

Interventionangle of flexion (degree) (Median)
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA)80
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)80

[back to top]

Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting Scores

percentage of patients reporting either symptoms of nausea or vomiting over the first 72 hours following surgery. Scale 0-2 wherein 0=no nausea and vomiting, 1=nausea and 2= nausea and vomiting (NCT02478372)
Timeframe: 24hours, 48 hours and 72 hours post-surgery

Interventionpercentage of patients reporting PONV (Number)
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA)16
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)14

[back to top]

Post-operative Urinary Catheterisation Rates

% of patients requiring catheterisation for urinary retention post-surgery (NCT02478372)
Timeframe: 72 hours post-surgery

Interventionpercentage of patients catheterised (Number)
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA)9.2
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)4.4

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Discharged From Rehabilitation by Day Four

"% of patients meeting predetermined discharge criteria at 96 Hours post-surgery.~The discharge criteria were: self dependent (dress, personal care); in and out of bedd independently; up and down stairs; walk with crutches/stick; 80 degrees knee flexion; able to straight leg raise operated limb." (NCT02478372)
Timeframe: 96 hours

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA)77
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)82

[back to top]

Average Post-operative Length of Stay

Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 days (NCT02478372)
Timeframe: Average number of days spent in hospital follwoing surgery, an expected average of 5 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA)4
Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)4

[back to top]

Change in Mean Arterial Pressure

(NCT02497040)
Timeframe: 220+-70 minutes

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Bupivacaine,Levobupivacaine110
Levobupivacaine105
Bupivacaine100

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg for > 20 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 50 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 20 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group304
Hypotension Decision Support85

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 55 mmHg during anesthesia for 1 minute or more. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group10991
Hypotension Decision Support3045

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg for > 10 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 55 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 10 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group3181
Hypotension Decision Support759

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 55 mmHg for > 20 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 55 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 20 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group1223
Hypotension Decision Support284

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg during anesthesia for 1 minute or more. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group13779
Hypotension Decision Support3798

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg for > 10 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 10 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group6989
Hypotension Decision Support1723

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 60 mmHg for > 20 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 20 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group3632
Hypotension Decision Support792

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Epinephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosage would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group1.00
Hypotension Decision Support0.70

[back to top]

Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 50 mmHg

Average concentrations of propofol infusion rates during MAP < 50 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmcg/kg/min (propofol) (Median)
Usual Care Group65.00
Hypotension Decision Support50.00

[back to top]

Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 55 mmHg

Average concentrations of propofol infusion rates during MAP < 55 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmcg/kg/min (propofol) (Median)
Usual Care Group63.95
Hypotension Decision Support50.00

[back to top]

Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 60 mmHg

Average concentrations of propofol infusion rates during MAP < 60 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmcg/kg/min (propofol) (Median)
Usual Care Group61.07
Hypotension Decision Support50.00

[back to top]

Intravenous Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 65 mmHg

Average concentrations of propofol infusion rates during MAP < 65 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmcg/kg/min (propofol) (Median)
Usual Care Group60.10
Hypotension Decision Support48.59

[back to top]

Postoperative Rise in Creatinine Levels

Absolute values for serum creatinine before and after surgery will be compared. When multiple postoperative creatinine measurements are made, the maximum difference is reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: Within 7 days after surgery

Interventionmg/dL (Median)
Usual Care Group0.00
Hypotension Decision Support0.00

[back to top]

Time to Discharge Readiness at the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

The time from arriving at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) until the time the patient is considered ready for discharge (in minutes). (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: from the start of admission to the PACU to discharge from the PACU, an expected average of 4 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group67
Hypotension Decision Support60

[back to top]

Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 50 mmHg

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Time of first administration of cardiovascular drug relative to the time at which the mean arterial pressure (MAP) drops below 50 mmHg. Per patient the average time to first administration of all hypotensive episodes was calculated. That average time is used as the outcome variable. A negative value indicates that administration occurred before the drop in MAP. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group1
Hypotension Decision Support0

[back to top]

Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 55 mmHg

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Time of first administration of cardiovascular drug relative to the time at which the mean arterial pressure (MAP) drops below 55 mmHg. Per patient the average time to first administration of all hypotensive episodes was calculated. That average time is used as the outcome variable. A negative value indicates that administration occurred before the drop in MAP. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group1
Hypotension Decision Support0.5

[back to top]

Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 60 mmHg

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Time of first administration of cardiovascular drug relative to the time at which the mean arterial pressure (MAP) drops below 60 mmHg. Per patient the average time to first administration of all hypotensive episodes was calculated. That average time is used as the outcome variable. A negative value indicates that administration occurred before the drop in MAP. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group0.8
Hypotension Decision Support1.5

[back to top]

Timing of Cardiovascular Drugs for MAP < 65 mmHg

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Time of first administration of cardiovascular drug relative to the time at which the mean arterial pressure (MAP) drops below 60 mmHg. Per patient the average time to first administration of all hypotensive episodes was calculated. That average time is used as the outcome variable. A negative value indicates that administration occurred before the drop in MAP. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Usual Care Group2
Hypotension Decision Support1.14

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephedrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group9310
Hypotension Decision Support2718

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephinephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group1215
Hypotension Decision Support409

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Glycopyrrolate

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group11093
Hypotension Decision Support1257

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Norepinephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group762
Hypotension Decision Support233

[back to top]

Usage Frequency of Cardiovascular Drugs: Phenylephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Frequency of patients receiving the drug. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group12211
Hypotension Decision Support3685

[back to top]

Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 50 mmHg

Average concentrations of inhalational anesthesia during MAP < 50 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

,
InterventionEndTidal% (other) (Median)
Sevoflurane (EndTidal %)Isoflurane (EndTidal %)Desflurane (EndTidal %)
Hypotension Decision Support1.230.654.70
Usual Care Group1.320.654.28

[back to top]

Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 55 mmHg

Average concentrations of inhalational anesthesia during MAP < 55 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

,
InterventionEndTidal% (other) (Median)
Sevoflurane (EndTidal %)Isoflurane (EndTidal %)Desflurane (EndTidal %)
Hypotension Decision Support1.250.674.65
Usual Care Group1.340.684.60

[back to top]

Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 60 mmHg

Average concentrations of inhalational anesthesia during MAP < 60 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

,
InterventionEndTidal% (other) (Median)
Sevoflurane (EndTidal %)Isoflurane (EndTidal %)Desflurane (EndTidal %)
Hypotension Decision Support1.250.672.33
Usual Care Group1.350.684.36

[back to top]

Inhaled Anesthetic Drug Use During Intraoperative Hypotension: MAP < 65 mmHg

Average concentrations of inhalational anesthesia during MAP < 65 mmHg episodes (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

,
InterventionEndTidal% (other) (Median)
Sevoflurane (EndTidal %)Isoflurane (EndTidal %)Desflurane (EndTidal %)
Hypotension Decision Support1.270.682.31
Usual Care Group1.350.684.10

[back to top]

30-day Mortality

Vanderbilt University Medical Center: combination of in-hospital mortality and 'alive-index' (which checks for visits to the hospital in the electronic healthcare record as indication of being alive at 30 days) (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: 30 days after surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group511
Hypotension Decision Support143

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Ephedrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosages would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group20
Hypotension Decision Support15

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Glycopyrrolate

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosage would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group0.40
Hypotension Decision Support0.40

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Norepinephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosage would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group0.62
Hypotension Decision Support0.70

[back to top]

Average Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Phenylephrine

Cardiovascular drugs as defined under interventions. Average use for each drug will be calculated. Cardiovascular drugs that were given in <1% of cases are not reported, as the average dosage would be meaningless. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Usual Care Group0.90
Hypotension Decision Support1.30

[back to top]

Intraoperative Administration of Intravenous Fluids

Total amount (mL) of intravenous fluids (as defined under interventions) administered during the surgical procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmL (Median)
Usual Care Group1500.00
Hypotension Decision Support1400.00

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 50 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group19
Hypotension Decision Support19

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 55 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group23
Hypotension Decision Support23

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 60 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group57
Hypotension Decision Support52

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 65 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group96
Hypotension Decision Support86

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 70 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group273
Hypotension Decision Support235

[back to top]

Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension - Threshold MAP 75 mmHg

Depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension will be modeled by calculating areas under the threshold for mean arterial pressures (MAPs). Thresholds will vary from 75 mmHg to 50 mmHg in 5 mmHg decrements. Together these variables represent the depth and duration of intraoperative hypotension. To optimize goodness of fit of these variables, the decremental steps may be increased to 10 mmHg and more restrictive lowest and highest thresholds may be chosen for the statistical analysis. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionmmHg*minute (Median)
Usual Care Group485
Hypotension Decision Support417

[back to top]

Estimated Intraoperative Blood Loss

The estimated blood loss in mL during the surgical procedure (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2 hours

InterventionmL (Median)
Usual Care Group100
Hypotension Decision Support75

[back to top]

In-hospital Mortality

Hospital mortality rate during a single hospital admission after the surgery (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: All postoperative days during a single hospital admission, expected median of 5 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group487
Hypotension Decision Support137

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 50 mmHg during anesthesia for 1 minute or more. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group7781
Hypotension Decision Support2196

[back to top]

Incidence of a MAP < 50 mmHg for > 10 Minutes

Incidence of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 50 mmHg for a cumulative duration of all hypotensive episodes of more than 10 minutes during the anesthetic phase of the procedure. (NCT02726620)
Timeframe: During the anesthetic phase of the surgical procedure: an expected average of 2.5 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Usual Care Group1159
Hypotension Decision Support326

[back to top]

Changes in Cognitive Function

"Assessment of cognitive function will be done using the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) rating scales before and 24,48,72,96 and 120 hours after the surgery at the same time every morning.~Mini-Mental State Examination Scale: minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 30; the severity of cognitive impairment: no cognitive impairment=25-30; mild cognitive impairment=19-24; moderate cognitive impairment=10-18; and severe cognitive impairment<9. Higher scores mean a better and lower scores mean a worse outcome." (NCT02848599)
Timeframe: Before, 24,48,72,96 and 120 hours after the surgery

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Before surgery24 h after surgery48 h after surgery72 h after surgery96 h after surgery120 h after surgery
Levobupivacaine222221212122
Morphine212020202020

[back to top]

Changes in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels

Measurement will be done before and 24,72 and 120 hours after the surgery. (NCT02848599)
Timeframe: Before, 24,72 and 120 hours after the surgery

,
Interventionmg/L (Median)
Before surgery24 h after surgery72 h after surgery120 h after surgery
Levobupivacaine57.898.19554.6
Morphine57.2106.2118.566.9

[back to top]

Postoperative Hospital Stay

Duration of postoperative hospital stay in days (NCT02848599)
Timeframe: 14 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Morphine7
Levobupivacaine7

[back to top]

Interleukin-6 Concentration in Peripheral Blood.

Measurement will be done before and 24 and 72 hours after the surgery. (NCT02848599)
Timeframe: Before, 24 and 72 hours after the surgery

,
Interventionpg/ml (Median)
Before surgery24h after surgery72h after surgery
Levobupivacaine26.697.730.5
Morphine27.210450

[back to top]

Changes in Pain Intensity

"Assessment will be done using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). During the first 72 hours after the surgery assessment will be done every 3 hours, after that assessment will be done 3 times daily. Median of 8 time points measurements during the first 24, 48 and 72 hours after the surgery will be reported. After that, median of 3 time points will be reported from the 4. to 6. postoperative day and on the day of discharge.~Minimum score 0 and maximum score 10 ( 0-No Pain; 1-3 Mild Pain; 4-6 Moderate Pain; 7-10 Severe Pain ). Higher scores mean a worse and lower scores mean a better outcome." (NCT02848599)
Timeframe: During the first 72 hours after the surgery assessment will be done every 3 hours, after that assessment will be done 3 times daily until discharge

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
3,6,9,12,15,18,21 and 24h after surgery27,30,33,36,39,42,45 and 48h after surgery51,54,57,60,63,66,69 and 72h after surgery4. postoperative day (every 8 hours)5. postoperative day (every 8 hours)6. postoperative day (every 8 hours)Day of discharge
Levobupivacaine0.60.50.50.3000
Morphine1.41.51.41.41.41.31

[back to top]

Changes in Fibrinogen Concentrations in Peripheral Blood

Measurement will be done before and 24,72 and 120 hours after the surgery. (NCT02848599)
Timeframe: Before, 24,72 and 120 hours after the surgery

,
Interventiong/L (Median)
Before surgery24 h after surgery72 h after surgery120 h after surgery
Levobupivacaine4.54.75.25
Morphine5.55.35.75.4

[back to top]