Page last updated: 2024-12-07

olmesartan medoxomil

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Olmesartan Medoxomil: An ANGIOTENSIN II TYPE 1 RECEPTOR BLOCKER that is used to manage HYPERTENSION. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID130881
CHEMBL ID1200692
CHEBI ID31932
SCHEMBL ID16403
MeSH IDM0257341

Synonyms (154)

Synonym
AC-1601
6m97xtv3hd ,
unii-6m97xtv3hd
olmesartan medoxomil [usan:inn:ban]
olsertain
nsc 758924
HY-17005
BRD-K78485176-001-02-9
gtpl591
openvas
1h-imidazole-5-carboxylic acid, 4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-((2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl) (1,1'-biphenyl)-4-yl)methyl)-, (5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl) methyl ester
cs-866rn
benicar
olmetec
1h-imidazole-5-carboxylic acid, 4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-((2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)(1,1'-biphenyl)-4-yl)methyl)-,(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl ester
cs-866dm
olvance
1h-imidazole-5-carboxylic acid, 4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-((2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)(1,1'-biphenyl)-4-yl)methyl)-, (5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl ester
olmesartan medoxomil
cs 866
benevas
SPECTRUM_001944
BSPBIO_003491
SPECTRUM5_001556
benicar (tn)
144689-63-4
olmetec (tn)
olmesartan medoxomil (jp17/usp)
D01204
NCGC00095136-02
NCGC00095136-01
cs-866
KBIO2_007626
KBIOGR_001040
KBIO2_002490
KBIO2_005058
KBIO3_002711
KBIOSS_002498
SPECTRUM3_001676
SPECTRUM2_000506
SPBIO_000431
SPECTRUM4_000740
SPECTRUM1505205
HMS2093K16
HMS2089K18
CHEMBL1200692
nsc-758924
L001061
HMS1922L15
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 5-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-3-[[4-[2-(2h-tetrazol-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl]methyl]imidazole-4-carboxylate
5-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-3-[[4-[2-(2h-tetrazol-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl]methyl]-4-imidazolecarboxylic acid (5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl ester
(5-methyl-2-oxidanylidene-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 5-(2-oxidanylpropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-3-[[4-[2-(2h-1,2,3,4-tetrazol-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl]methyl]imidazole-4-carboxylate
A808260
NCGC00095136-03
nsc758924
BCP9000555
pharmakon1600-01505205
dtxcid7025924
cas-144689-63-4
dtxsid9045924 ,
tox21_111445
5-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-3-[2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)-biphenyl-4-ylmethyl]-3h-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid 5-methyl-2-oxo-[1,3]dioxol-4-ylmethyl ester
c29h30n6o6
CCG-39596
FT-0601603
olmesartan medoxomil [usp monograph]
olmesartan medoxomil [inn]
olmesartan medoxomil [vandf]
olmesartan medoxomil component of benicar hct
olmesartan medoxomil [mart.]
olmesartan medoxomil [who-dd]
azor component olmesartan medoxomil
tribenzor component olmesartan medoxomil
olmesartan medoxomil [usp-rs]
olmesartan medoxomil component of azor
1h-imidazole-5-carboxylic acid, 4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-((2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)(1,1'-biphenyl)-4-yl)methyl)-, (5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3- dioxol-4-yl)methyl ester
olmesartan medoxomil component of tribenzor
olmesartan medoxomil [usan]
olmesartan medoxomil [orange book]
olmesartan medoxomil [ep monograph]
olmesartan medoxomil [jan]
benicar hct component olmesartan medoxomil
CS-0577
S1604
AKOS015894907
AKOS015914772
bdbm50442892
CCG-221184
smr002203616
MLS006010109
SCHEMBL16403
KS-1182 ,
AB01275443-01
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 1-((2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)methyl)-4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1h-i midazole-5-carboxylate
J-501595
UQGKUQLKSCSZGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxolen-4yl)methyl 4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-{4-[2-(tetrazol-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl}methylimidazole-5-carboxylate
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxolen-4-yl)methyl 4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-[[2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl]methyl]imidazole-5-carboxylate
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxolen-4-yl)methyl 4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-{4-[2-(tetrazol-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl}methylimidazole-5-carboxylate
olmesartan medoxomil|4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-[[2'-(2h-tetrazol-5-yl)[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl]methyl]-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylic acid-(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl ester
olmesartan medoxomil, pharmaceutical secondary standard; certified reference material
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 1-((2'-(2h-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)methyl)-4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 1-((2'-(2h-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl)-4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate
AB01275443_03
AB01275443_02
STL451024
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1-{[2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl]methyl}-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate
olmesartan (medoxomil)
medoxomil, olmesartan
cs866
olmesartanmedoxomil
mfcd00944911
SR-05000001987-2
sr-05000001987
olmesartan medoxomil, united states pharmacopeia (usp) reference standard
HMS3651E13
SR-05000001987-1
olmesartan medoxomil, >=98% (hplc)
olmesartan medoxomil, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
olmesartan medoxomil for system suitability, european pharmacopoeia (ep) reference standard
votume
CHEBI:31932
SBI-0206741.P001
HMS3715N09
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 1-((2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]4-yl)methyl)-4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 1-((2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)methyl)-4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate
SW199650-2
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 1-((2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl)-4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate
BCP05214
Q27888058
Z1541759904
olmesartan medoxomil (benicar)
O0510
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 4-(2-hydroxy-2-propanyl)-2-propyl-1-[[2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)-4-biphenylyl]methyl]-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 1-[[2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl]methyl]-4-(2-hydroxypr
AMY22222
BRD-K78485176-001-03-7
SB19327
olmesartan-medoxomil
HMS3743O09
NCGC00095136-09
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl1-((2'-(2h-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)methyl)-4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate
olmesartan-d4medoxomil
EN300-122375
(5-methyl-2-oxo-2h-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1-{[2'-(1h-1,2,3,4-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl]methyl}-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate
HY-17005R
CS-0694888
olmesartan medoxomil (standard)
olmesartan medoxomil (usp-rs)
olmesartan medoxomil (usp monograph)
5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxolen-4-yl)methoxy-4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-(4-(2-(tetrazol-5-yl)phenyl)phenyl)methylimidazol-5-carboxylate-t287346
olmesartan medoxomil (ep monograph)
olmesartan medoxomil (mart.)
(5-methyl-2-oxo-1,3-dioxol-4-yl)methyl 4-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-2-propyl-1-((2'-(1h-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl)-1h-imidazole-5-carboxylate

Research Excerpts

Overview

Olmesartan medoxomil is a new non-peptide angiotensin (A) II antagonist under development for treating hypertension. The drug has the adverse effect of celiac like enteropathy which was accepted by the FDA in 2013.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Olmesartan medoxomil is a new non-peptide angiotensin (A) II antagonist under development for treating hypertension. "( In vitro and in vivo pharmacology of olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin II type AT1 receptor antagonist.
Koike, H; Mizuno, M; Sada, T, 2001
)
2.03
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OM) is a prodrug-type angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist. "( Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
Fujimori, I; Ikeda, T; Ishizuka, T; Izumi, T; Kurihara, A; Nakahara, K; Nishida, A; Sakurai, H; Yoshigae, Y, 2012
)
2.07
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OM) is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and has been shown to exhibit renoprotective effects on a streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rat model."( Olmesartan Medoxomil, An Angiotensin II-Receptor Blocker, Ameliorates Renal Injury In db/db Mice.
Cui, TX; Ding, A; Li, ZL; Yang, H; Zhang, H; Zhang, HT; Zhu, WP; Zhu, Y, 2019
)
2.68
"Olmesartan Medoxomil (OM) is an angiotensin receptor blocker and has the adverse effect of celiac like enteropathy which was accepted by the FDA in 2013. "( Comparison of Pharmacodynamics and Celiac Effects of Olmesartan Medoxomil Formulations by using Olmesartan-induced Celiac-rat-model.
Ergur, BU; Karasulu, E; Komesli, Y, 2021
)
2.31
"Olmesartan medoxomil is an antihypertensive drug of the class of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists (or blockers), characterized by tight and prolonged binding to AT1 receptor compared to other molecules within the same class. "( Monotherapy and Dual Combination Therapies Based on Olmesartan: A Comprehensive Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control.
Battistoni, A; Coluccia, R; Mastromarino, V; Santolamazza, C; Tocci, G; Volpe, M, 2017
)
1.9
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) is an antihypertensive drug with low oral bioavailability due to extensive first-pass metabolism. "( Use of transethosomes for enhancing the transdermal delivery of olmesartan medoxomil: in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo evaluation.
Abdelbary, AA; Albash, R; El-Nabarawi, MA; Refai, H, 2019
)
2.2
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OM) is a hydrophobic antihypertensive drug with low bioavailability (26%) and is known to have adverse effects such as celiac disease and enteropathy. "( Design and development of a self-microemulsifying drug delivery system of olmesartan medoxomil for enhanced bioavailability.
Burak Ozkaya, A; Karasulu, E; Kirilmaz, L; Komesli, Y; Ugur Ergur, B, 2019
)
2.19
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) is a promising prodrug hydrolyzed to olmesartan (OL) during absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. "( In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Olmesartan Medoxomil Microcrysta ls and Nanocrystals: Preparation, Characterization, and Pharmacokinet ic Comparison in Beagle Dogs.
Chai, R; Fu, Q; Gao, H; Guo, M; He, Z; Liu, H; Ma, Z, 2019
)
2.23
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OM) is a prodrug-type angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB). "( Different hydrolases involved in bioactivation of prodrug-type angiotensin receptor blockers: carboxymethylenebutenolidase and carboxylesterase 1.
Ishizuka, T; Izumi, T; Murayama, N; Yoshigae, Y, 2013
)
1.83
"Olmesartan medoxomil is an orally given angiotensin II receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of hypertension."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Olmesartan, the Active Metabolite of Olmesartan Medoxomil, in Patients with Hypertension.
Kodati, D; Kotakonda, HK; Yellu, N, 2017
)
2.13
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) is an antihypertensive drug with low oral bioavailability (28%) resulting from poor aqueous solubility, presystemic metabolism and P-glycoprotein mediated efflux. "( Solid lipid nanoparticles as vesicles for oral delivery of olmesartan medoxomil: formulation, optimization and in vivo evaluation.
Chella, N; Kulhari, H; Nooli, M; Shastri, NR; Sistla, R, 2017
)
2.14
"Olmesartan medoxomil is a new angiotensin-2 receptor blocker (ARB). "( Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil in hemodialysis patients: little effect of dialysis upon its pharmacokinetics.
Hamano, T; Horio, M; Imai, E; Isaka, Y; Ito, T; Iwatani, H; Kawada, N; Matsui, I; Nagasawa, Y; Tanaka, H, 2009
)
2.12
"Olmesartan medoxomil is a long-acting, well-tolerated, effective ARB that prevents or reverses endothelial dysfunction in animal models of atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes, nephropathy, and retinopathy."( Effect of angiotensin receptor blockade on endothelial function: focus on olmesartan medoxomil.
Ferrario, C, 2009
)
1.31
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) is an antihypertensive angiotensin II receptor blocker. "( Solubilized formulation of olmesartan medoxomil for enhancing oral bioavailability.
Choi, WS; Choi, YB; Choi, YW; Kang, MJ; Kim, HS; Lee, BS; Lee, J; Lee, SK, 2009
)
2.09
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OM) is a prodrug type angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist widely prescribed as an antihypertensive agent. "( Human carboxymethylenebutenolidase as a bioactivating hydrolase of olmesartan medoxomil in liver and intestine.
Fujimori, I; Ikeda, T; Ishizuka, T; Izumi, T; Kato, M; Kubota, K; Kurihara, A; Noji-Sakikawa, C; Okazaki, O; Saito, M; Yoshigae, Y, 2010
)
2.04
"Olmesartan medoxomil is an angiotensin II-receptor antagonist used in the treatment of hypertension. "( The relative bioavailability and fasting pharmacokinetics of three formulations of olmesartan medoxomil 20-mg capsules and tablets in healthy Chinese male volunteers: An open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, three-way crossover study.
Hu, BQ; Jiang, Y; Li, KY; Liang, JP; Lin, XP; Luo, CH; Qiu, Y; Yang, N, 2010
)
2.03
"Olmesartan medoxomil is an orally administered angiotensin II receptor antagonist, selective for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, which has established antihypertensive efficacy in adults. "( Olmesartan medoxomil: in children and adolescents with hypertension.
Keating, GM; Muir, VJ, 2010
)
3.25
"Olmesartan medoxomil is a new angiotensin II receptor blocker. "( Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure measurements.
Chen, CL; Elliott, WJ; Izzo, J; Masonson, H; Neutel, J,
)
1.87
"Olmesartan medoxomil is a competitively priced addition to the class of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. "( Olmesartan medoxomil: the seventh angiotensin receptor antagonist.
Franks, AM; Gardner, SF, 2003
)
3.2
"Olmesartan medoxomil is an effective antihypertensive agent, with BP-lowering efficacy at the starting dose similar to that of amlodipine, and is associated with more patients achieving the rigorous BP goals of SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <85 mmHg."( Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil compared with amlodipine for mild-to-moderate hypertension.
Chrysant, SG; Marbury, TC; Robinson, TD, 2003
)
1.31
"Olmesartan medoxomil is a new angiotensin-II receptor antagonist for the treatment of hypertension. "( Clinical efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil.
Brunner, HR; Laeis, P, 2003
)
2.08
"Olmesartan medoxomil is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist that selectively and competitively inhibits the angiotensin II type 1 receptor."( Clinical efficacy and tolerability of olmesartan.
Brunner, HR, 2004
)
1.77
"Olmesartan medoxomil is a new angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) indicated for the treatment of hypertension. "( [Pharmacological profiles and clinical effects of olmesartan medoxomil, a novel angiotensin II receptor blocker].
Mizuno, M; Sada, T, 2004
)
2.02
"Olmesartan medoxomil is a new orally active angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor antagonist. "( Clinical and experimental aspects of olmesartan medoxomil, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist.
Kohzuki, M; Yoshida, K, 2004
)
2.04
"Olmesartan medoxomil (CS-866) is a new orally active angiotensin II receptor antagonist that is highly selective for the AT1 receptor subtype."( Population pharmacokinetics of olmesartan following oral administration of its prodrug, olmesartan medoxomil: in healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients.
Gao, Y; Hisaoka, M; Shiga, H; Wada, DR; Yoshihara, K, 2005
)
1.99
"Olmesartan medoxomil is an angiotensin II receptor blocker with similar antihypertensive efficacy as the calcium channel blocker amlodipine besylate in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. "( Use of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess blood pressure control: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate.
Chrysant, SG; Marbury, TC; Silfani, TN, 2006
)
1.99
"Olmesartan medoxomil is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist. "( Olmesartan medoxomil: current status of its use in monotherapy.
Brunner, HR, 2006
)
3.22
"Olmesartan medoxomil is a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist which selectively and competitively inhibits the type 1 angiotensin II receptor without affecting other receptors regulating the cardiovascular system. "( Olmesartan medoxomil.
Jarvis, B; Warner, GT, 2002
)
3.2

Effects

Olmesartan medoxomil (OM), an ARB, has been well studied and achieves significant BP lowering and goal achievement with good tolerability. The drug has shown no clinically important pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin, warfarin or antacid (aluminium magnesium hydroxide)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Olmesartan medoxomil has a favorable safety and efficacy profile, with blood pressure-lowering effects comparable to those of other angiotensin receptor blockers (i.e., losartan, valsartan, irbesartan). "( Olmesartan medoxomil: the seventh angiotensin receptor antagonist.
Franks, AM; Gardner, SF, 2003
)
3.2
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OM), an ARB, has been well studied and achieves significant BP lowering and goal achievement with good tolerability."( Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in patients with stage 1 hypertension: blood pressure lowering and goal achievement.
Wilford Germino, F, 2010
)
1.39
"Olmesartan medoxomil has a favorable safety and efficacy profile, with blood pressure-lowering effects comparable to those of other angiotensin receptor blockers (i.e., losartan, valsartan, irbesartan). "( Olmesartan medoxomil: the seventh angiotensin receptor antagonist.
Franks, AM; Gardner, SF, 2003
)
3.2
"Olmesartan medoxomil has been reported to be an effective agent for the treatment of hypertension. "( Olmesartan medoxomil: an angiotensin II-receptor blocker.
Brousil, JA; Burke, JM, 2003
)
3.2
"Olmesartan medoxomil has minimal adverse effects with no clinically important drug interactions."( Clinical and experimental aspects of olmesartan medoxomil, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist.
Kohzuki, M; Yoshida, K, 2004
)
1.32
"Olmesartan medoxomil has one of the highest degrees of antihypertensive efficacy among the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists."( Effect of olmesartan medoxomil on atherosclerosis: clinical implications of the emerging evidence.
Miyazaki, M; Takai, S, 2006
)
1.46
"Olmesartan medoxomil has shown no clinically important pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin, warfarin or antacid (aluminium magnesium hydroxide)."( Olmesartan medoxomil.
Jarvis, B; Warner, GT, 2002
)
2.48

Treatment

An olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled titration study in 276 patients with stage 1 (47.1%) or 2 (52.9%) hypertension. Treatment also reduced left ventricular mass index (p<0.001) and LVH.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Olmesartan medoxomil treatment also reduced left ventricular mass index (p<0.001) and LVH (p<0.001)."( Effect of olmesartan medoxomil on cystatin C level, left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function.
Albayrak, S; Alemdar, R; Aydin, M; Kaya, A; Ordu, S; Ozhan, H; Yazici, M, 2009
)
1.48
"An olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled titration study in 276 patients with stage 1 (47.1%) or 2 (52.9%) hypertension. "( Effect of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm on systolic blood pressure in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Dubiel, R; Kereiakes, DJ; Maa, JF; Shojaee, A, 2010
)
1.35
"An olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm effectively reduced SBP and achieved SBP targets in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension. "( Effect of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm on systolic blood pressure in patients with stage 1 or 2 hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Dubiel, R; Kereiakes, DJ; Maa, JF; Shojaee, A, 2010
)
1.35
"An olmesartan medoxomil ± HCTZ treatment regimen significantly reduced BP from baseline in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes."( Seated cuff blood pressure-lowering efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Kereiakes, DJ; Neutel, JM, 2011
)
1.24
"Treatment with olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg FDC tablets was safe and well tolerated."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine in healthy Chinese males and females.
Chen, X; Hu, P; Jiang, J; Liu, H; Liu, T; Zhao, Q; Zhong, W, 2012
)
0.95
"Treatment with olmesartan medoxomil resulted in a significant placebo-adjusted reduction of mean 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure of 9.6 mm Hg, 12.2 mm Hg, and 10.6 mm Hg in the 5-, 20-, and 80-mg q.d."( Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure measurements.
Chen, CL; Elliott, WJ; Izzo, J; Masonson, H; Neutel, J,
)
0.76
"Treatment with olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/day was associated with a lower frequency of adverse events than olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy (21.5% vs 28.3%, respectively)."( Efficacy and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: the OLMEBEST Study.
Barrios, V; Boccanelli, A; Böhm, M; Ewald, S; Girerd, X; Heagerty, A; Krzesinski, JM; Lins, R; Rodicio, J; Stefenelli, T; Woittiez, A, 2007
)
0.97

Toxicity

Olmesartan medoxomil was safe and highly effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The hypotensive effect was superior to losartan potassium (50 mg-100 mg once daily)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Olmesartan medoxomil was safe and highly effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension in these studies."( Blood pressure response, but not adverse event incidence, correlates with dose of angiotensin II antagonist.
Laeis, P; Püchler, K; Stumpe, KO, 2001
)
1.75
" During combined treatment with olmesartan plus glibenclamide, no adverse event occurred, and the medications were well tolerated."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with glibenclamide in healthy volunteers.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.62
" (4) The incidence of study drug-related adverse events (AEs) in olmesartan group (10."( [Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension].
Cai, NS; Chen, YZ; Fan, WH; Guo, JX; He, B; Huang, J; Ke, YN; Li, XL; Ma, H; Wu, ZG; Zhu, DL; Zhu, JR, 2006
)
0.64
"This study shows that olmesartan medoxomil, at oral dose of 20 mg-40 mg once daily was effective and safe for hypertension treatment and the hypotensive effect was superior to losartan potassium (50 mg-100 mg once daily)."( [Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension].
Cai, NS; Chen, YZ; Fan, WH; Guo, JX; He, B; Huang, J; Ke, YN; Li, XL; Ma, H; Wu, ZG; Zhu, DL; Zhu, JR, 2006
)
0.96
" Based above analysis, it was concluded that olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg was safe and there were no any accumulation in healthy Chinese subjects after multiple-dose."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of olmesartan medoxomil in healthy Chinese subjects after single and multiple administrations.
Hu, P; Jiang, J; Liu, D, 2009
)
0.88
" After 8 weeks of treatment, the combination of amlodipine + OM is safe and efficacious, irrespective of baseline hypertension stage or prior antihypertensive medication use."( Subgroup analyses of an efficacy and safety study of concomitant administration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil: evaluation by baseline hypertension stage and prior antihypertensive medication use.
Karki, S; Lee, J; Melino, M; Oparil, S, 2009
)
0.57
" Study medication was safe and well tolerated."( Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the combination of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil in patients with hypertension.
Chrysant, SG; Heyrman, R; Karki, S; Lee, J; Melino, M; Oparil, S, 2009
)
0.57
" The incidence of adverse events was similar in the O/A combination groups and the monotherapy groups."( A randomized, double-blind, four-arm parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of azelnidipine and olmesartan medoxomil combination therapy compared with each monotherapy in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: the REZALT study.
Kuramoto, K; Ogihara, T; Saruta, T; Shimada, K, 2009
)
0.57
" Adverse events were generally mild and unrelated to study medication."( A double-blind, dose-response study of the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in children and adolescents with hypertension.
Bhorat, AE; Hazan, L; Hernández Rodriguez, OA; Heyrman, R; Miyazaki, K; Tao, B, 2010
)
0.6
"One of the reasons for suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control in patients with hypertension is poor adherence to treatment, which may be caused by treatment-emergent adverse events."( Safety and tolerability of an olmesartan medoxomil-based regimen in patients with stage 1 hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Chrysant, SG, 2010
)
0.65
"In patients with stage 1 hypertension, the olmesartan medoxomil-based regimen was generally well tolerated at all titration steps, and discontinuation due to adverse events was similar between olmesartan medoxomil and placebo."( Safety and tolerability of an olmesartan medoxomil-based regimen in patients with stage 1 hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Chrysant, SG, 2010
)
0.91
" This regimen was also effective in terms of BP lowering and enabling patients to achieve BP goals without an adverse effect on tolerability."( Safety and tolerability of an olmesartan medoxomil-based regimen in patients with stage 1 hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Chrysant, SG, 2010
)
0.65
" The most common adverse events reported were dizziness (82."( Olmesartan medoxomil evaluated for safety and efficacy in Indian patients with essential hypertension: a real world observational postmarketing surveillance.
Rana, R; Singh, A, 2010
)
1.8
" These results suggest that olmesartan/amlodipine is effective and safe in a wide range of patients, regardless of age or hypertension severity."( Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil plus amlodipine in age, gender and hypertension severity defined subgroups of hypertensive patients.
Böhm, M; Schmieder, RE, 2011
)
0.68
" The proportion of patients with drug-related adverse events was comparable in the two groups (3."( Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil and ramipril in elderly patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: the ESPORT study.
Auteri, A; Malacco, E; Omboni, S; Volpe, M; Zanchetti, A, 2010
)
0.63
" Moreover, combination therapy comprising OM plus hydrochlorothiazide can significantly increase BP goal achievement without significantly increasing adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in patients with stage 1 hypertension: blood pressure lowering and goal achievement.
Wilford Germino, F, 2010
)
0.67
" The proportion of patients with drug-related adverse events was comparable in the two groups (4."( Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan and ramipril in elderly patients with mild to moderate systolic and diastolic essential hypertension.
Barton, J; Mallion, JM; Narkiewicz, K; Omboni, S; Panzer, PK; Puig, JG; Stefanadis, C; Van Mieghem, W; Zweiker, R, 2011
)
0.37
" In conclusion, PIO and OLM combination can primarily be stated as safe in terms of present toxicity and pharmacokinetics findings."( Development of safety profile evaluating pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicity of a combination of pioglitazone and olmesartan medoxomil in Wistar albino rats.
Nandi, U; Pal, TK; Sengupta, P, 2012
)
0.59
" Olmesartan and LOS were well tolerated, and the most common treatment-emergent adverse event was headache."( Efficacy/safety of olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in patients by stage 1 or 2 hypertension.
Chavanu, KJ; Flack, JM; Graff, A; Li, W, 2012
)
0.71
" The incidence of drug-related adverse effects did not differ significantly between the groups."( Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine fixed-dose combination for hypertensive patients uncontrolled with monotherapy.
Gao, PJ; Zhang, SY; Zhu, JR, 2014
)
0.71
" There were 50 adverse events in 41 patients (22."( Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination therapy with olmesartan medoxomil and rosuvastatin in Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension and dyslipidemia: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, factorial-design study (OLSTA-D RCT:
Ahn, Y; Baek, SH; Choi, DH; Hong, TJ; Hyon, MS; Jeong, JO; Kang, WC; Kim, HS; Kim, SH; Kim, YH; Lee, SC; Nam, CW; Park, JS; Park, TH; Seo, HS; Shim, WJ; Shin, JH, 2016
)
0.68
" In addition, the olmesartan nanoemulsion was found to be safe and non-toxic, as it neither produced any lethality nor remarkable haematological, biochemical and structural adverse effects as observed during the 28-days sub-chronic toxicity studies in experimental Wistar rats."( Comparative biodistribution and safety profiling of olmesartan medoxomil oil-in-water oral nanoemulsion.
Choudhury, H; Gorain, B; Jaisankar, P; Karan, S; Pal, TK; Tekade, RK, 2016
)
0.68
" Treatment-emergent adverse events/serious adverse events occurred in 78."( Comparison of long-term safety of fixed-dose combinations azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone vs olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide.
Barger, B; Cushman, WC; Handley, A; Lloyd, E; Neutel, JM, 2017
)
0.67
" The therapy was safe and well tolerated."( Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of a Single-Pill Combination of Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide in Korean Patients with Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk Factors.
Hong, JH; Hyun, D; Kim, GH; Kim, HL; Kim, W; Lim, S; Min, KW; Oh, J; Park, SD; Shin, J, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide were adequately described using our PPK model. With the exception of a slight shift of tmax values for glibenclamide, the concomitant treatment had no significant effects on steady-state pharmacokinetics of either agent.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"8 hours, and the terminal elimination half-life ranged from 12 to 18 hours."( Pharmacokinetics of CS-866, a new angiotensin II receptor blocker, in healthy subjects.
Masonson, HN; Schwocho, LR, 2001
)
0.31
" Pharmacokinetic steady state was reached within the first few days after oral dosing."( Olmesartan medoxomil: influence of age, renal and hepatic function on the pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil.
Gonzalez, L; Laeis, P; Püchler, K; Schwocho, LR; Sudhop, T; von Bergmann, K, 2001
)
1.75
"To develop a population pharmacokinetic model for olmesartan (RNH-6270), the active metabolite of olmesartan medoxomil, in healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients, and to evaluate effects of covariates on the apparent oral clearance (CL/F), with particular emphasis on the effect of race."( Population pharmacokinetics of olmesartan following oral administration of its prodrug, olmesartan medoxomil: in healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients.
Gao, Y; Hisaoka, M; Shiga, H; Wada, DR; Yoshihara, K, 2005
)
0.77
"The pharmacokinetic data of olmesartan were well described by a two-compartment linear model with first-order absorption and an absorption lag-time, parameterised in terms of CL/F (6."( Population pharmacokinetics of olmesartan following oral administration of its prodrug, olmesartan medoxomil: in healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients.
Gao, Y; Hisaoka, M; Shiga, H; Wada, DR; Yoshihara, K, 2005
)
0.55
"The population pharmacokinetic analysis of olmesartan showed that: (i) severe renal impairment (serum creatinine >265 micromol/L [approximately 3 mg/dL]) could cause a clearance decrease of > or =30%; (ii) older age, lower bodyweight and being female were determinants of lower clearance but their effects on olmesartan clearance were within 20%; (iii) no statistically significant difference in clearance was found between Westerners and Japanese."( Population pharmacokinetics of olmesartan following oral administration of its prodrug, olmesartan medoxomil: in healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients.
Gao, Y; Hisaoka, M; Shiga, H; Wada, DR; Yoshihara, K, 2005
)
0.55
"To investigate the pharmacokinetic interactions, safety, and tolerability of the combination of olmesartan medoxomil with glibenclamide."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with glibenclamide in healthy volunteers.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.84
"With the exception of a slight shift of tmax values for glibenclamide, the concomitant administration of olmesartan medoxomil with glibenclamide had no significant effects on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of either agent."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with glibenclamide in healthy volunteers.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.83
" This trial investigated the possibility of pharmacokinetic interactions between the AT1 receptor antagonist olmesartan medoxomil and the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide in healthy subjects."( Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy subjects.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.87
" The primary pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated were: the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve at steady state (AUCss,tau), the maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Css,max), and the time at which Css,max occurred (tmax)."( Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy subjects.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.66
"Complete data sets from 17 subjects were available for pharmacokinetic analyses."( Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy subjects.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.66
"These results show that there is little or no potential for a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, and therefore dosage adjustment should not be necessary when they are co-administered."( Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy subjects.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.87
"Population pharmacokinetic models for amlodipine and olmesartan were developed using data collected from 4 phase I studies in healthy volunteers and 1 phase III study in subjects with mild to severe hypertension."( Evaluation of population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship with coadministration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil.
Carrothers, TJ; Khariton, T; Kshirsagar, S; Lee, J; Rohatagi, S; Salazar, D, 2008
)
0.55
" Another pharmacokinetic parameter, such as maximum plasma drug concentration (C (max)), biological half-life (t (1/2)) and time to reach C (max) (t (max)), were almost similar in both groups."( Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil in hemodialysis patients: little effect of dialysis upon its pharmacokinetics.
Hamano, T; Horio, M; Imai, E; Isaka, Y; Ito, T; Iwatani, H; Kawada, N; Matsui, I; Nagasawa, Y; Tanaka, H, 2009
)
0.68
"The impact of SLCO1B1 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of olmesartan and on the pharmacokinetic interaction between pravastatin and olmesartan was investigated."( Pharmacokinetic interaction between pravastatin and olmesartan in relation to SLCO1B1 polymorphism.
Higuchi, S; Hirota, T; Ieiri, I; Irie, S; Kawabata, K; Kimura, M; Kusuhara, H; Sugiyama, Y; Suwannakul, S, 2008
)
0.35
" From a pharmacokinetic perspective, the 2 drugs are well suited to coadministration in a fixed-dose combination."( Pharmacokinetics of amlodipine and olmesartan after administration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil in separate dosage forms and as a fixed-dose combination.
Allison, M; Bathala, MS; Haworth, S; Heyrman, R; Lee, J; Noveck, R; Rohatagi, S; Rubets, I; Salazar, DE; Shenouda, M, 2008
)
0.57
" Blood and urine samples were obtained for a 48-h pharmacokinetic evaluation on two PK days (Day 1 and Day 9)."( Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of olmesartan medoxomil in healthy Chinese subjects after single and multiple administrations.
Hu, P; Jiang, J; Liu, D, 2009
)
0.62
" Bioequivalence was established for all pharmacokinetic parameters."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with either amlodipine or atenolol compared to respective monotherapies in healthy subjects.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R; Scholze, J, 2009
)
0.64
" In conclusion, the effects of olmesartan medoxomil and azelnidipine were modestly correlated with pharmacokinetic profiles, and the pre-treatment PRA level could be a useful determinant of responsiveness in selecting olmesartan medoxomil and azelnidipine."( Comparative pharmacodynamics of olmesartan and azelnidipine in patients with hypertension: a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.
Arakawa, K; Kuramoto, K; Tanigawara, Y; Yoshihara, K, 2009
)
0.64
" The pharmacokinetic parameters of IIa were studied and compared with those of olmesartan medoxomil."( Novel amides and esters prodrugs of olmesartan: Synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetic evaluation.
Chang, JS; Cho, YJ; Choi, WK; Choi, YW; Chung, HJ; El-Gamal, MI; Jeon, HR; Kim, HI; Lee, BS; Lee, J; Lee, WS; Lee, YS; Oh, CH; Park, JH, 2010
)
0.59
"This study investigated the relative bioavailability and fasting pharmacokinetic properties of olmesartan after single doses of a 20-mg test tablet, a 20-mg test capsule, and a commercially available 20-mg reference tablet in healthy Chinese male volunteers."( The relative bioavailability and fasting pharmacokinetics of three formulations of olmesartan medoxomil 20-mg capsules and tablets in healthy Chinese male volunteers: An open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, three-way crossover study.
Hu, BQ; Jiang, Y; Li, KY; Liang, JP; Lin, XP; Luo, CH; Qiu, Y; Yang, N, 2010
)
0.59
" And the pharmacokinetic parameters for olmesartan after their oral administration were also estimated and compared with those in case of olmesartan medoxomil."( Design, synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetics evaluation of new ester prodrugs of olmesartan.
Anbar, HS; Chang, JS; Cho, YJ; Choi, YW; Chung, HJ; El-Gamal, MI; Jeon, HR; Kim, HI; Lee, BS; Lee, DJ; Lee, J; Lee, SA; Lee, WS; Moon, JY; Oh, CH, 2011
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic study was performed by orally administering PIO and OLM at single dose of 3 and 2mg/kg, respectively alone and in combination analyzing the plasma samples using LC-MS/MS."( Development of safety profile evaluating pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicity of a combination of pioglitazone and olmesartan medoxomil in Wistar albino rats.
Nandi, U; Pal, TK; Sengupta, P, 2012
)
0.59
" Plasma elimination half-life and time to maximum plasma concentration were similar across the three groups."( Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil in pediatric patients with hypertension.
Blowey, DL; Blumer, J; Heyrman, R; Rohatagi, S; Salazar, DE; Sherbotie, JR; Song, S; Sullivan, JE; Wells, TG, 2012
)
0.7
"Olmesartan medoxomil was well tolerated and demonstrated a pharmacokinetic profile in pediatric patients similar to that of adults when adjusted for body size."( Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil in pediatric patients with hypertension.
Blowey, DL; Blumer, J; Heyrman, R; Rohatagi, S; Salazar, DE; Sherbotie, JR; Song, S; Sullivan, JE; Wells, TG, 2012
)
2.15
" Meanwhile, blood pressure and heart rate were repeatedly taken to delineate the pharmacodynamic profiles."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine in healthy Chinese males and females.
Chen, X; Hu, P; Jiang, J; Liu, H; Liu, T; Zhao, Q; Zhong, W, 2012
)
0.61
" The elimination half-life of amlodipine is more than twice as long as that of olmesartan."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine in healthy Chinese males and females.
Chen, X; Hu, P; Jiang, J; Liu, H; Liu, T; Zhao, Q; Zhong, W, 2012
)
0.61
"After single and multiple doses of olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine 20 mg/5 mg FDC tablets the pharmacokinetic profiles of olmesartan or amlodipine were comparable to those reported for monotherapy with olmesartan medoxomil or amlodipine, except that the elimination half-life of olmesartan was longer because of the longer time course over which pharmacokinetic blood sampling was carried out in this study."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine in healthy Chinese males and females.
Chen, X; Hu, P; Jiang, J; Liu, H; Liu, T; Zhao, Q; Zhong, W, 2012
)
0.89
" For the colesevelam coadministration periods, 3,750 mg once daily was dosed throughout the pharmacokinetic sampling period."( The effects of colesevelam HCl on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of glimepiride, extended-release glipizide, and olmesartan medoxomil.
He, L; Lee, J; Mendell-Harary, J; Tao, B; Walker, J; Wickremasingha, P; Wight, D, 2014
)
0.61
" The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated, and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (test/reference) of the parameters were obtained by analysis of variance (ANOVA) on logarithmically transformed data."( Pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide in healthy Korean male subjects.
Chae, SW; Choi, Y; Im, YJ; Jeon, JY; Jin, C; Jung, JA; Kim, MG; Kim, Y; Park, K, 2014
)
0.66
"The objective of the present study was to develop population pharmacokinetic models for olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide and to investigate the influence of demographic factors on these population pharmacokinetics."( Development of a population pharmacokinetic model to describe olmesartan medoxomil/ hydrochlorothiazide (20/12.5 mg) FDC tablet in male healthy South Korean subjects.
Back, HM; Baek, IH; Chae, JW; Jung, SH; Kang, W; Kwon, KI; Lee, BY; Seo, JW; Song, BJ; Yun, HY, 2014
)
0.87
" All evaluations indicated that the pharmacokinetic profiles of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide were adequately described using our PPK model."( Development of a population pharmacokinetic model to describe olmesartan medoxomil/ hydrochlorothiazide (20/12.5 mg) FDC tablet in male healthy South Korean subjects.
Back, HM; Baek, IH; Chae, JW; Jung, SH; Kang, W; Kwon, KI; Lee, BY; Seo, JW; Song, BJ; Yun, HY, 2014
)
0.88
" The optimized formulation was further evaluated for in vitro drug release, confocal microscopy and in vivo pharmacokinetic study."( Design, formulation and optimization of novel soft nano-carriers for transdermal olmesartan medoxomil delivery: In vitro characterization and in vivo pharmacokinetic assessment.
Ahad, A; Ali, A; Aqil, M; Imam, SS; Kamran, M; Sultana, Y, 2016
)
0.66
"The aim of the study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic model for olmesartan, the active metabolite of olmesartan medoxomil, in Indian hypertensive patients, and to evaluate effects of covariates on the volume of distribution (V/F) and oral clearance (CL/F) of olmesartan."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Olmesartan, the Active Metabolite of Olmesartan Medoxomil, in Patients with Hypertension.
Kodati, D; Kotakonda, HK; Yellu, N, 2017
)
0.9
" The pharmacokinetic data of olmesartan was well described by a two-compartment linear pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption and an absorption lag-time."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Olmesartan, the Active Metabolite of Olmesartan Medoxomil, in Patients with Hypertension.
Kodati, D; Kotakonda, HK; Yellu, N, 2017
)
0.68
"The final population pharmacokinetic model was demonstrated to be appropriate and effective and it can be used to assess the pharmacokinetic parameters of olmesartan in Indian patients with hypertension."( Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Olmesartan, the Active Metabolite of Olmesartan Medoxomil, in Patients with Hypertension.
Kodati, D; Kotakonda, HK; Yellu, N, 2017
)
0.68
" Prepared SLNs were evaluated for physical characters and in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) performance in rats."( Development of olmesartan medoxomil lipid-based nanoparticles and nanosuspension: preparation, characterization and comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation.
B, A; D, N; Veerabrahma, K, 2018
)
0.83
" The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of selected formula compared to oral and nasal OLM suspensions were conducted."( Chitosan nanoparticles for intranasal delivery of olmesartan medoxomil: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives.
El-Din, SB; Gad, HA; Hassan, RH; Ishak, RAH; Shaker, DS, 2022
)
0.97

Compound-Compound Interactions

Clopidogrel bisulfate tablets combined with olmesartan medoxomil has prominent clinical effects in the treatment of ischemic stroke patients with hypertension.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Microdialysis combined with tandem mass spectrometry was used to monitor the rapid hydrolysis of CS-866, a new prodrug-type angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in vitro in rat and human plasma as well as in hepatic and intestinal preparations."( Real-time monitoring of metabolic reactions by microdialysis in combination with tandem mass spectrometry: hydrolysis of CS-866 in vitro in human and rat plasma, livers, and small intestines.
Fujimori, I; Ikeda, T; Kobayashi, N; Watanabe, M, 2000
)
0.31
" In this randomized double-blind study we investigated renin-angiotensin system blockade obtained with 3 doses of olmesartan medoxomil (20, 40, and 80 mg every day) in 30 normal subjects and compared it with that obtained with lisinopril alone (20 mg every day) or combined with olmesartan medoxomil (20 or 40 mg)."( Sustained 24-hour blockade of the renin-angiotensin system: a high dose of a long-acting blocker is as effective as a lower dose combined with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.
Brunner, HR; Burnier, M; Forclaz, A; Hasler, C; Maillard, M; Nussberger, J, 2005
)
0.54
"7 ng h/ml in combination with glibenclamide; the corresponding Css,max values were 479."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with glibenclamide in healthy volunteers.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.62
" When using combination therapy, antihypertensive agents with complementary mechanisms of action are recommended, for example, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), a beta-blocker + HCTZ, an ACE inhibitor + HCTZ, or a calcium channel blocker + an ACE inhibitor."( Olmesartan medoxomil combined with hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of hypertension.
Greathouse, M, 2006
)
1.78
" Patients were given OLM alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs at the discretion of the investigators."( The use of olmesartan medoxomil as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents in elderly hypertensive patients in Japan.
Hiramatsu, K; Hirata, K; Kobayashi, F; Komiya, M; Kushiro, T; Sagawa, K; Saito, I; Sato, Y, 2008
)
0.74
"These results suggest that olmesartan medoxomil combined with amlodipine is effective and well tolerated in reducing BP in patients with moderate to severe hypertension."( Efficacy and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil combined with amlodipine in patients with moderate to severe hypertension after amlodipine monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study.
Brommer, P; Haag, U; Miele, C; Volpe, M, 2009
)
0.94
" Additionally, the increased efficacy resulting from the combination with hydrochlorothiazide does not appear to significantly affect the tolerability profile of olmesartan medoxomil."( Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide.
Punzi, HA, 2009
)
0.86
" Although angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be combined with other anti-hypertensives, it is unclear how the effects of ARBs are influenced by co-administered anti-hypertensives."( Blood pressure-lowering effects of angiotensin receptor antagonist monotherapy and in combination with other anti-hypertensive drugs in primary care settings in Japan.
Hiramatsu, K; Hirata, K; Ishikawa, M; Komiya, M; Kushiro, T; Matsushita, Y; Sagawa, K; Saito, I; Yamashita, T, 2009
)
0.35
" We analysed pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with either amlodipine or atenolol compared to respective monotherapies in two separate studies."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with either amlodipine or atenolol compared to respective monotherapies in healthy subjects.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R; Scholze, J, 2009
)
0.9
"Aliskiren combined with olmesartan reduces proteinuria in CKD patients."( Beneficial effect of aliskiren combined with olmesartan in reducing urinary protein excretion in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Itabashi, M; Kojima, C; Moriyama, T; Nitta, K; Ogawa, T; Sugiura, H; Takei, T; Tsuchiya, K; Tsuruta, Y; Uchida, K, 2012
)
0.38
"The hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) influence the pharmacokinetics of several drug classes and are involved in many clinical drug-drug interactions."( Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
Artursson, P; Haglund, U; Karlgren, M; Kimoto, E; Lai, Y; Norinder, U; Vildhede, A; Wisniewski, JR, 2012
)
0.38
"The study is to investigate drug-drug interaction (DDI) between olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), to confirm bioequivalence (BE) of a new combined formulation and coadministration of separate local tablets, and to receive pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the new combined formulation after multiple doses in healthy Chinese subjects."( Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy Chinese subjects: drug-drug interaction, bioequivalence, and accumulation.
Hu, P; Jiang, J; Liu, DY; Wang, CG; Zhang, JY, 2014
)
0.91
"Ischemic stroke combined with hypertension can increase risks of stroke recurrence and death."( The Clinical Efficacy of Clopidogrel Bisulfate Tablets Combined with Olmesartan Medoxomil for Ischemic Stroke with Hypertension and the Effect of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Level on Prognosis.
Fang, W; Guo, X; Jiang, H; Jin, X; Liu, Y; Sun, P; Yu, J, 2021
)
0.86
"Clopidogrel bisulfate tablets combined with olmesartan medoxomil has prominent clinical effects in the treatment of ischemic stroke patients with hypertension, evidently improving the prognosis."( The Clinical Efficacy of Clopidogrel Bisulfate Tablets Combined with Olmesartan Medoxomil for Ischemic Stroke with Hypertension and the Effect of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Level on Prognosis.
Fang, W; Guo, X; Jiang, H; Jin, X; Liu, Y; Sun, P; Yu, J, 2021
)
1.12
"This is a prospective parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study the effects of α lipoic acid in combination with olmesartan medoxomil on blood glucose and oxidation indicators in patients with DN."( Effects of α lipoic acid combined with olmesartan medoxomil on blood glucose and oxidation indicators in patients with diabetic nephropathy: A protocol for a parallel, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.
Chang, X; Dong, Y; Jiao, S; Li, H; Wu, Y, 2022
)
1.19
"This study will evaluate the effects of α lipoic acid combined with olmesartan medoxomil on blood glucose and oxidation indicators in patients with DN."( Effects of α lipoic acid combined with olmesartan medoxomil on blood glucose and oxidation indicators in patients with diabetic nephropathy: A protocol for a parallel, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.
Chang, X; Dong, Y; Jiao, S; Li, H; Wu, Y, 2022
)
1.23
" The availability of OM combined with HCTZ, AML or both at different dosages makes it a valuable option to customize therapy based on the levels of BP and the clinical characteristics of hypertensive patients."( Single-Pill Combination with Three Antihypertensive Agents to Improve Blood Pressure Control in Hypertension: Focus on Olmesartan-Based Combinations.
Burnier, M; Redon, J; Volpe, M, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

The aim of the study was to improve the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) by using different particle size-reduction strategies. The current research work explores the potential applications of cationic nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Absolute bioavailability of RNH-6270 after oral administration of CS-866 was 26%."( Pharmacokinetics of CS-866, a new angiotensin II receptor blocker, in healthy subjects.
Masonson, HN; Schwocho, LR, 2001
)
0.31
" Bioavailability (Cmax and area under the curve) increased approximately in proportion with dose, after single and multiple daily oral doses, over the therapeutic dose range (up to 40-80 mg daily), above which systemic availability of olmesartan increased less than proportionally with increase in dose."( The pharmacokinetic and metabolic profile of olmesartan medoxomil limits the risk of clinically relevant drug interaction.
Kirch, W; Laeis, P; Püchler, K, 2001
)
0.57
" After single oral doses of 10 mg olmesartan medoxomil daily to patients with mild (Child-Pugh score < or = 6) and moderate (score 7-9) hepatic impairment, Cmax was generally similar to that in healthy matched subjects, but AUC increased by 30 and 48%, respectively, and was reflected in small increases in absolute bioavailability values compared with healthy subject controls."( Olmesartan medoxomil: influence of age, renal and hepatic function on the pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil.
Gonzalez, L; Laeis, P; Püchler, K; Schwocho, LR; Sudhop, T; von Bergmann, K, 2001
)
2.03
" The absolute bioavailability of olmesartan from olmesartan medoxomil tablets is 28."( The new oral angiotensin II antagonist olmesartan medoxomil: a concise overview.
Brunner, HR, 2002
)
0.84
"66 L/h for a typical male Western hypertensive patient), absorption rate constant (1."( Population pharmacokinetics of olmesartan following oral administration of its prodrug, olmesartan medoxomil: in healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients.
Gao, Y; Hisaoka, M; Shiga, H; Wada, DR; Yoshihara, K, 2005
)
0.55
" OLM has a low bioavailability (BA), approximately 26% in humans, due to its low water solubility and efflux by drug resistance pumps in the gastrointestinal tract."( Solubilized formulation of olmesartan medoxomil for enhancing oral bioavailability.
Choi, WS; Choi, YB; Choi, YW; Kang, MJ; Kim, HS; Lee, BS; Lee, J; Lee, SK, 2009
)
0.65
" These findings may explain the known interaction of telmisartan with digoxin and suggest that it may modulate the bioavailability of drugs whose absorption is restricted by P-gp and possibly also by BCRP or MRP2."( Interaction of angiotensin receptor type 1 blockers with ATP-binding cassette transporters.
Benndorf, RA; Böger, RH; Divac, N; Haefeli, WE; Herzog, M; Sauer, A; Schwedhelm, E; Weiss, J, 2010
)
0.36
"This study investigated the relative bioavailability and fasting pharmacokinetic properties of olmesartan after single doses of a 20-mg test tablet, a 20-mg test capsule, and a commercially available 20-mg reference tablet in healthy Chinese male volunteers."( The relative bioavailability and fasting pharmacokinetics of three formulations of olmesartan medoxomil 20-mg capsules and tablets in healthy Chinese male volunteers: An open-label, randomized-sequence, single-dose, three-way crossover study.
Hu, BQ; Jiang, Y; Li, KY; Liang, JP; Lin, XP; Luo, CH; Qiu, Y; Yang, N, 2010
)
0.59
" Reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability has an important role in the process of endothelial dysfunction and hypertension."( Optimal therapeutic strategy for treating patients with hypertension and atherosclerosis: focus on olmesartan medoxomil.
Mason, RP, 2011
)
0.59
" Higher bioavailability compared to commercial oral tablets with a more sustainment behavior was achieved."( Development and characterization of colloidal soft nano-carriers for transdermal delivery and bioavailability enhancement of an angiotensin II receptor blocker.
Elshafeey, AH; Hathout, RM, 2012
)
0.38
" To increase oral bioavailability of carboxylic acid 9, two different prodrug approaches were applied."( Synthesis and pharmacological properties of a new hydrophilic and orally bioavailable 5-HT4 antagonist.
Andressen, KW; Brudeli, B; Klaveness, J; Levy, FO; Moltzau, LR; Nguyen, CH; Nilsen, NO, 2013
)
0.39
" By analysing the findings of the present investigations based on stability study, Caco-2 permeability, pharmacokinetic profile and pharmacodynamic evaluation indicated that the nanoemulsion of OM (OMF6) could significantly enhance the oral bioavailability of relatively insoluble OM contributing to improved clinical application."( Nanoemulsion strategy for olmesartan medoxomil improves oral absorption and extended antihypertensive activity in hypertensive rats.
Choudhury, H; Gorain, B; Jaisankar, P; Karmakar, S; Kundu, A; Pal, TK; Sarkar, L, 2014
)
0.7
"The current research work explores the potential applications of cationic self-nanoemulsifying oily formulations (CSNEOFs) for enhancing the oral bioavailability of olmesartan medoxomil."( Positively charged self-nanoemulsifying oily formulations of olmesartan medoxomil: Systematic development, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo evaluation.
Beg, S; Jain, S; Katare, OP; Sharma, G; Singh, B; Thanki, K, 2015
)
0.85
"15 times improvement in bioavailability of olmesartan with respect to the control formulation in Wistar rats."( Design, formulation and optimization of novel soft nano-carriers for transdermal olmesartan medoxomil delivery: In vitro characterization and in vivo pharmacokinetic assessment.
Ahad, A; Ali, A; Aqil, M; Imam, SS; Kamran, M; Sultana, Y, 2016
)
0.66
"Poor aqueous solubility and unfavourable de-esterification of olmesartan medoxomil (a selective angiotensin II receptor blocker), results in low oral bioavailability of less than 26%."( Comparative biodistribution and safety profiling of olmesartan medoxomil oil-in-water oral nanoemulsion.
Choudhury, H; Gorain, B; Jaisankar, P; Karan, S; Pal, TK; Tekade, RK, 2016
)
0.93
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) is an antihypertensive drug with low oral bioavailability (28%) resulting from poor aqueous solubility, presystemic metabolism and P-glycoprotein mediated efflux."( Solid lipid nanoparticles as vesicles for oral delivery of olmesartan medoxomil: formulation, optimization and in vivo evaluation.
Chella, N; Kulhari, H; Nooli, M; Shastri, NR; Sistla, R, 2017
)
2.14
"32-fold enhancement in relative bioavailability of drug from SLN when compared to that of OLM plain drug on oral administration."( Solid lipid nanoparticles as vesicles for oral delivery of olmesartan medoxomil: formulation, optimization and in vivo evaluation.
Chella, N; Kulhari, H; Nooli, M; Shastri, NR; Sistla, R, 2017
)
0.7
"The aim of the present study is to increase the saturation solubility and oral bioavailability of olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) using nano-sized crystals produced using a combination of antisolvent precipitation and high-shear homogenization."( Formulation, optimization, and in vitro-in vivo evaluation of olmesartan medoxomil nanocrystals.
Arora, S; Dora, CP; Jain, S; Patel, K; Reddy, VA, 2017
)
0.91
"The aim of the present investigation was to enhance the oral bioavailability of olmesartan medoxomil by improving its solubility and dissolution rate by preparing nanosuspension (OM-NS), using the Box-Behnken design."( Development of olmesartan medoxomil optimized nanosuspension using the Box-Behnken design to improve oral bioavailability.
Kishan, V; Nagaraj, K; Narendar, D, 2017
)
1.04
"The current study explores the potential of nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) for oral bioavailability enhancement of olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) by systemic design approach."( Nanostructured lipid carriers of olmesartan medoxomil with enhanced oral bioavailability.
Dora, CP; Jain, S; Kaithwas, V; Kushwah, V, 2017
)
0.94
"The aim was to enhance the oral bioavailability of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) by preparing solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and comparing with nanosuspension (OM-NS)."( Development of olmesartan medoxomil lipid-based nanoparticles and nanosuspension: preparation, characterization and comparative pharmacokinetic evaluation.
B, A; D, N; Veerabrahma, K, 2018
)
1.09
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) is an antihypertensive drug with low oral bioavailability due to extensive first-pass metabolism."( Use of transethosomes for enhancing the transdermal delivery of olmesartan medoxomil: in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo evaluation.
Abdelbary, AA; Albash, R; El-Nabarawi, MA; Refai, H, 2019
)
2.2
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OM) is a hydrophobic antihypertensive drug with low bioavailability (26%) and is known to have adverse effects such as celiac disease and enteropathy."( Design and development of a self-microemulsifying drug delivery system of olmesartan medoxomil for enhanced bioavailability.
Burak Ozkaya, A; Karasulu, E; Kirilmaz, L; Komesli, Y; Ugur Ergur, B, 2019
)
2.19
"The aim of the study was to improve the oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) by using different particle size-reduction strategies."( In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Olmesartan Medoxomil Microcrysta ls and Nanocrystals: Preparation, Characterization, and Pharmacokinet ic Comparison in Beagle Dogs.
Chai, R; Fu, Q; Gao, H; Guo, M; He, Z; Liu, H; Ma, Z, 2019
)
1.01
" In contrast, OLM microcrystals failed to improve the oral bioavailability of the drugs."( In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Olmesartan Medoxomil Microcrysta ls and Nanocrystals: Preparation, Characterization, and Pharmacokinet ic Comparison in Beagle Dogs.
Chai, R; Fu, Q; Gao, H; Guo, M; He, Z; Liu, H; Ma, Z, 2019
)
0.79
"Particles size reduction to nano-scale by means of nanocrystals technology significantly increased in vitro dissolution rate and in vivo oral bioavailability of OLM."( In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Olmesartan Medoxomil Microcrysta ls and Nanocrystals: Preparation, Characterization, and Pharmacokinet ic Comparison in Beagle Dogs.
Chai, R; Fu, Q; Gao, H; Guo, M; He, Z; Liu, H; Ma, Z, 2019
)
0.79
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"The intention of this work was to load olmesartan medoxomil (OLM), a sparsely water soluble antihypertensive bioactive with low oral bioavailability (26%), into PEGylated bilosomes (PBs) for augmenting its transdermal delivery."( Tailoring of PEGylated bilosomes for promoting the transdermal delivery of olmesartan medoxomil: in-vitro characterization, ex-vivo permeation and in-vivo assessment.
Abdelbary, AA; Albash, R; El-Nabarawi, MA; Refai, H, 2019
)
1.01
"Olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) an antihypertensive molecule with poor solubility and poor bioavailability (26% when taken orally) was selected as a model drug."( Bioavailability Enhancement of Olmesartan Medoxomil Using Hot-Melt Extrusion: In-Silico, In-Vitro, and In-Vivo Evaluation.
Deshpande, V; Gokarna, V; Jadhav, P; Vavia, P, 2020
)
2.29
" However, poor water solubility and low bioavailability limit its widespread use."( Preparation of olmesartan medoxomil solid dispersion with sustained release performance by mechanochemical technology.
Dushkin, AV; Feng, Z; Ren, W; Su, W; Zhang, Q; Zhao, Y, 2022
)
1.07
"Nasal drug delivery has the potential to improve the systemic bioavailability of drugs with low oral bioavailability."( Chitosan nanoparticles for intranasal delivery of olmesartan medoxomil: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives.
El-Din, SB; Gad, HA; Hassan, RH; Ishak, RAH; Shaker, DS, 2022
)
0.97
"This study aims to formulate Olmesartan medoxomil (OM) into oral fast-dissolving tablets (FDTs) to improve its solubility and bioavailability via two different techniques; The polymer-based surface solid dispersion (SSD) technique and the solidified surfactant (SS) technique."( Dissolution enhancement of olmesartan medoxomil through polymer-based surface solid dispersion and solidified surfactant techniques.
Al-Mahallawi, AM; Daihom, BA; Elbortokaly, HM; Mohamed, MI, 2022
)
1.31

Dosage Studied

Oral olmesartan medoxomil significantly and dose-dependently reduced seated systolic blood pressure (BP) and seated dystolic BP from baseline.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"This study was conducted to assess the dose-response relationship of the new angiotensin II (Ang II) antagonist CS-866 on blood pressure and on endocrine parameters in hypertensive patients with an activated renin-angiotensin system."( Blood pressure and endocrine effects of single doses of CS-866, a novel angiotensin II antagonist, in salt-restricted hypertensive patients.
Brunner, HR; Laeis, P; Nussberger, J; Püchler, K; Witte, PU, 1997
)
0.3
" Such pharmacological studies can be used to investigate dose-response relationships."( Relevance of clinical pharmacological models for the evaluation of therapeutic dose range of an AT1-receptor antagonist.
Brunner, HR; Nussberger, J, 2001
)
0.31
" Since the increased plasma concentrations (Cmax and AUC(0-24 h)) in elderly and very elderly patients, and in mild and moderate renal and hepatic impairment, were several-fold lower than plasma concentrations observed in other studies after 80 mg olmesartan medoxomil daily that were well tolerated, a dosing adjustment in these groups is not considered necessary."( Olmesartan medoxomil: influence of age, renal and hepatic function on the pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil.
Gonzalez, L; Laeis, P; Püchler, K; Schwocho, LR; Sudhop, T; von Bergmann, K, 2001
)
1.93
"All studies used conventional sphygmomanometry for blood pressure measurements at trough (end of the dosing interval)."( Blood pressure response, but not adverse event incidence, correlates with dose of angiotensin II antagonist.
Laeis, P; Püchler, K; Stumpe, KO, 2001
)
0.31
"This review describes the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, adverse-effect profile, drug-interaction potential, and dosing of olmesartan medoxomil."( Olmesartan medoxomil: an angiotensin II-receptor blocker.
Brousil, JA; Burke, JM, 2003
)
1.97
" It then outlines the clinical pharmacokinetics and interaction profile of the novel antihypertensive olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (AIIRA), and relates the findings to the recommended dosing regimen and tolerability of the drug."( Can the pharmacokinetic characteristics of olmesartan medoxomil contribute to the improvement of blood pressure control?
Wehling, M, 2004
)
0.8
" Dosage was doubled at week 4 and hydrochlorothiazide was added at week 12 if blood pressure response was inadequate."( Olmesartan compared with other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: head-to-head trials.
Stumpe, KO, 2004
)
0.32
" The recommended usual dosage is 20 mg/day."( [The drug of the month: Olmesartan medoxomil].
Krzesinski, JM; Scheen, AJ, 2004
)
0.63
" Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) allows accurate assessment of a patient's hypertension and risk for cardiovascular events, and provides the most accurate measure of an antihypertensive agent's efficacy throughout a 24-hour dosing interval."( Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.
Dubiel, R; Jones, M; Smith, DH, 2005
)
0.54
"The combination of olmesartan with glibenclamide did not influence the bioequivalence of the area under the plasma-concentration time curve at steady state during one dosing interval 0 to tau = 24 hours (AUCss,tau) or the maximum steady-state concentration (Css,max) of both substances."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in combination with glibenclamide in healthy volunteers.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.62
"These results show that there is little or no potential for a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, and therefore dosage adjustment should not be necessary when they are co-administered."( Pharmacokinetics of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy subjects.
Bolbrinker, J; Huber, M; Kreutz, R, 2006
)
0.87
" If the subject's seating diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) was still >or=90 mm Hg, the dosage was doubled for another 4 weeks; for those subjects whose SeDBP was <90 mm Hg after 4-week treatment, the initial dosage remained unchanged and the treatment continued until completion of the study."( [Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension].
Cai, NS; Chen, YZ; Fan, WH; Guo, JX; He, B; Huang, J; Ke, YN; Li, XL; Ma, H; Wu, ZG; Zhu, DL; Zhu, JR, 2006
)
0.64
"A simple, rapid and reliable UV spectrophotometric method was developed for the determination of olmesartan medoxomil in pharmaceutical dosage forms."( Determination of olmesartan medoxomil in tablets by UV-Vis spectrophotometry.
Altinoz, S; Celebier, M, 2007
)
0.9
" This article addresses this issue by reviewing the dose-response characteristics of olmesartan medoxomil and other ARBs, as well as the relationship between ARB uptitration and BP goal attainment."( Dose-response characteristics of olmesartan medoxomil and other angiotensin receptor antagonists.
Smith, DH, 2007
)
0.84
" Notably, BP control is sustained throughout the 24-hour dosage interval, including during the last 4 hours of this period."( Olmesartan medoxomil: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.
McCormack, PL; Scott, LJ, 2008
)
1.79
"The pharmacokinetics of amlodipine and olmesartan in healthy volunteers after coadministration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil concomitantly as separate dosage forms and together in a fixed-dose combination tablet were characterized in 5 phase I, randomized, crossover studies."( Pharmacokinetics of amlodipine and olmesartan after administration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil in separate dosage forms and as a fixed-dose combination.
Allison, M; Bathala, MS; Haworth, S; Heyrman, R; Lee, J; Noveck, R; Rohatagi, S; Rubets, I; Salazar, DE; Shenouda, M, 2008
)
0.77
" black triangle In the comparison with amlodipine monotherapy, >70% of olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine recipients, some requiring upwards dosage adjustment, met BP goals."( Olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine.
Keam, SJ; Sanford, M, 2009
)
2.03
" An OM-based treatment algorithm effectively lowers BP in an elderly patient population throughout the 24-hour dosing interval without compromising tolerability."( The effects of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm on 24-hour blood pressure levels in elderly patients aged 65 and older.
Dubiel, R; Kereiakes, DJ; Neutel, J; Shojaee, A; Stoakes, KA; Waverczak, WF; Xu, J, 2009
)
0.69
" In each subgroup, > or =1 dosage combination of amlodipine + OM significantly reduced SeDBP and SeSBP compared with constituent monotherapies."( Subgroup analyses of an efficacy and safety study of concomitant administration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil: evaluation by baseline hypertension stage and prior antihypertensive medication use.
Karki, S; Lee, J; Melino, M; Oparil, S, 2009
)
0.57
"Two simple, economical, rapid, precise, and accurate methods for simultaneous determination of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide in combined tablet dosage form have been developed."( Ratio spectra derivative and zero-crossing difference spectrophotometric determination of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide in combined pharmaceutical dosage form.
Bari, PD; Rote, AR, 2009
)
0.79
" The method was applied successfully for the assay of olmesartan medoxomil in the tablet dosage form."( RP-HPLC-DAD method for determination of olmesartan medoxomil in bulk and tablets exposed to forced conditions.
Pancholi, SS; Sharma, RN, 2010
)
0.88
" Since there is no monograph for this drug in tablets, the dissolution method presented here can be used as a quality control test for OLM in this dosage form, especially in a batch to batch evaluation."( Development and validation of a discriminating in vitro dissolution method for a poorly soluble drug, olmesartan medoxomil: comparison between commercial tablets.
Bajerski, L; Bergold, AM; Dias, CL; Fröehlich, PE; Rossi, RC, 2010
)
0.58
" The larger blood pressure reduction obtained with O was particularly evident in the last 6 h from the dosing interval; a better homogeneity of the 24-h BP control with O was confirmed by higher smoothness indices."( Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil and ramipril in elderly patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: the ESPORT study.
Auteri, A; Malacco, E; Omboni, S; Volpe, M; Zanchetti, A, 2010
)
0.63
" The superiority of O was particularly evident in the last 4 h from the dosing interval."( Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan and ramipril in elderly patients with mild to moderate systolic and diastolic essential hypertension.
Barton, J; Mallion, JM; Narkiewicz, K; Omboni, S; Panzer, PK; Puig, JG; Stefanadis, C; Van Mieghem, W; Zweiker, R, 2011
)
0.37
" In conclusion, adding HCTZ to OM 40 mg significantly improves BP reductions and target BP rates in harder-to-treat patients and a clear dose-response was observed for efficacy."( Effects of high dose olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure control in patients with grade 2 and grade 3 hypertension.
Girerd, X; Rump, LC; Sellin, L; Stegbauer, J, 2011
)
0.69
" In children and adolescents with hypertension (n = 302), oral olmesartan medoxomil significantly and dose-dependently reduced seated systolic blood pressure (BP) and seated dystolic BP from baseline (the primary endpoint) in a 3-week, dose-response period in a well designed phase II/III clinical trial."( Olmesartan medoxomil: in children and adolescents with hypertension.
Keating, GM; Muir, VJ, 2010
)
2.04
" In conclusion, this amlodipine/OM-based titration regimen was well tolerated and effectively lowered BP throughout the 24-hour dosing interval in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes."( Management of hypertension in patients with diabetes using an amlodipine-, olmesartan medoxomil-, and hydrochlorothiazide-based titration regimen.
Littlejohn, T; Neutel, JM; Qian, C; Ram, CV; Sachson, R; Shojaee, A; Stoakes, KA, 2011
)
0.6
" Secondary efficacy endpoints included the change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP; change from baseline in ambulatory BP during the daytime (8:00 am-4:00 pm), nighttime (10:00 pm-6:00 am) and the last 6, 4 and 2 hours of the dosing interval; change from baseline in SeBP at each titration step and at study end; and the proportion of patients achieving mean 24-hour ambulatory BP targets and SeBP goals at week 12."( Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide-based treatment algorithm in elderly patients (age ≥65 years) stratified by age, sex and race: subgroup analysis of a 12-week, open-label, single-arm, dose-titration study.
Kereiakes, DJ; Maa, JF; Neutel, J; Shojaee, A; Stoakes, KA; Waverczak, WF, 2011
)
0.64
" Clinically significant ambulatory BP reductions were observed during the daytime, nighttime and the last 6, 4 and 2 hours of the dosing interval in all subgroups."( Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide-based treatment algorithm in elderly patients (age ≥65 years) stratified by age, sex and race: subgroup analysis of a 12-week, open-label, single-arm, dose-titration study.
Kereiakes, DJ; Maa, JF; Neutel, J; Shojaee, A; Stoakes, KA; Waverczak, WF, 2011
)
0.64
" Simulations based on models developed in adult patients indicated that two dose groups were sufficient to estimate a dose-response relationship, thereby reducing by one-third the number of subjects required for the phase III pediatric study."( The use of modeling and simulation to guide clinical development of olmesartan medoxomil in pediatric subjects.
Carrothers, TJ; Heyrman, R; Rohatagi, S; Salazar, DE; Shi, J; Song, SH; Wada, DR, 2012
)
0.61
"A simple, specific, accurate and precise stability-indicating reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed for simultaneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomile (OLME), amlodipine besylate (AMLO) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in tablet dosage form."( Stability-indicating method for simultaneous estimation of olmesartan medoxomile, amlodipine besylate and hydrochlorothiazide by RP-HPLC in tablet dosage form.
Chaudhari, AJ; Gorle, AP; Jain, PS; Patel, MK; Surana, SJ, 2012
)
0.82
"An OM/HCTZ-based titration regimen enabled elderly patients with hypertension to safely reduce BP throughout the 24-hour dosing interval and allowed the majority of these patients to achieve a BP target of <140/90 mmHg or <140 mmHg."( Efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide fixed-dose combination therapy in patients aged 65 years and older with stage 1 and 2 hypertension or isolated systolic hypertension.
Chavanu, KJ; Dubiel, R; Germino, FW; Maa, JF; Neutel, JM, 2012
)
0.76
"The present study aimed at development of capsular dosage form of surface-adsorbed nanoemulsion (NE) of olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) so as to overcome the limitations associated with handling of liquid NEs without affecting their pharmaceutical efficacy."( Product development studies on surface-adsorbed nanoemulsion of olmesartan medoxomil as a capsular dosage form.
Bali, V; Pathak, K; Singh, S, 2012
)
0.83
" Although the BP goals recommended in current consensus guidelines for the management of patients with hypertension are based on cuff BP measurements, ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) provides a valuable diagnostic tool and allows a more accurate assessment of BP levels throughout the 24-hour dosing period."( Olmesartan medoxomil-based antihypertensive therapy evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: efficacy in high-risk patient subgroups.
Chrysant, SG; Germino, FW; Neutel, JM, 2012
)
1.82
" Steady states of both compounds were attained after once-daily dosing for 8 days."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine in healthy Chinese males and females.
Chen, X; Hu, P; Jiang, J; Liu, H; Liu, T; Zhao, Q; Zhong, W, 2012
)
0.61
" Antihypertensive efficacy was maintained throughout the 24-hour dosing interval."( Efficacy/safety of a fixed-dose amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimen in hypertensive blacks and non-blacks with uncontrolled BP on prior antihypertensive monotherapy.
Maa, JF; Nesbitt, S; Shojaee, A, 2013
)
0.65
" For the colesevelam coadministration periods, 3,750 mg once daily was dosed throughout the pharmacokinetic sampling period."( The effects of colesevelam HCl on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of glimepiride, extended-release glipizide, and olmesartan medoxomil.
He, L; Lee, J; Mendell-Harary, J; Tao, B; Walker, J; Wickremasingha, P; Wight, D, 2014
)
0.61
" In stage 2, half of 28 subjects were daily dosed with regimen C for 7 days."( Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide combination in healthy Chinese subjects: drug-drug interaction, bioequivalence, and accumulation.
Hu, P; Jiang, J; Liu, DY; Wang, CG; Zhang, JY, 2014
)
0.68
" The specificity of the developed methods is investigated by analyzing laboratory prepared mixtures containing different ratios of the three drugs and their combined dosage form."( Spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of ternary mixture of amlodipine besylate, olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide.
Diab, SS; Merey, HA; Moustafa, AA; Ramadan, NK, 2014
)
0.62
" The ANCOVA showed that changes in patients' HRQoL was likely to have been influenced by patients' achievement of blood pressure control, the amount of concomitant medication and patients' last used dosage strength of antihypertensive."( Health-related quality of life impact of a triple combination of olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine besylate and hydrochlorotiazide in subjects with hypertension.
Brazier, JE; Guest, JF; Haag, U; Marques da Silva, P; Soro, M, 2015
)
0.65
" Achieving blood pressure control, amount of concomitant medication and dosage strength of antihypertensive impacted on patients' HRQoL."( Health-related quality of life impact of a triple combination of olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine besylate and hydrochlorotiazide in subjects with hypertension.
Brazier, JE; Guest, JF; Haag, U; Marques da Silva, P; Soro, M, 2015
)
0.65
" Two different three-way analysis methods, PARAFAC and 3W-PLS1, were successfully applied to the quantitative estimation of the solid dosage form containing HCT and OLM."( Three-way analysis of the UPLC-PDA dataset for the multicomponent quantitation of hydrochlorothiazide and olmesartan medoxomil in tablets by parallel factor analysis and three-way partial least squares.
Dinç, E; Ertekin, ZC, 2016
)
0.65
" AZL-M/CLD showed greater systolic BP reductions after initial dosing (P = ."( Long-term efficacy and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone vs olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide in chronic kidney disease.
Bakris, GL; Hisada, M; Juhasz, A; Kupfer, S; Lloyd, E; Oparil, S; Zhao, L, 2018
)
0.71
" After all patients received any of OLM 10, 20, and 40 mg/day as an initial dose, the dosage of OLM was titrated up to 40 mg as needed during follow-up period."( [Effects of Olmesartan Medoxomil on Patients with Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm;Evaluation of Anti-hypertensive Effect and Possible Suppression of Aneurysmal Dilation( OLM 40 Study)].
Adachi, O; Akiyama, M; Kumagai, K; Motoyoshi, N; Saiki, Y; Sasaki, K; Sato, M; Sugawara, Y, 2020
)
0.94
"5 hours before dosing to 168 hours after dosing."( Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Olmesartan Medoxomil and Amlodipine Besylate Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.
Chen, L; Li, X; Mo, E, 2022
)
0.97
" The developed methods are accurate, precise, eco-friendly and could be applied successfully to estimate OLM and MET in their combined dosage form."( Area under the curve and ratio difference spectrophotometric methods with evaluation of the greenness for simultaneous determination of olmesartan medoxomil and metoprolol succinate.
Hammad, SF; Kamal, AH; Kamel, DN, 2023
)
1.11
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
biphenylsBenzenoid aromatic compounds containing two phenyl or substituted-phenyl groups which are joined together by a single bond.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (3)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Metabolism14961108
Biological oxidations150276
Phase I - Functionalization of compounds69175

Protein Targets (28)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, TYROSYL-DNA PHOSPHODIESTERASEHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.02240.004023.8416100.0000AID485290
Chain A, CruzipainTrypanosoma cruziPotency7.94330.002014.677939.8107AID1476
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.49830.000811.382244.6684AID686978
cytochrome P450 3A4 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency25.11890.031610.279239.8107AID884; AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit piRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency33.49150.002319.595674.0614AID651631
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit deltaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
GABA theta subunitRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit epsilonRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency25.11891.000012.224831.6228AID885
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)28.50000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)4.73000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.97720.10472.71957.0795AID977603
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.75000.08002.46889.8000AID977604
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.97720.05002.37979.7000AID977600
Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.54000.04401.36305.0000AID977601
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (174)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to starvationAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitochondrial depolarizationAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to calcium ion starvationAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
cellular oxidant detoxificationAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
transportAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
lipid metabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
androgen metabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
cellular glucuronidationUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic ion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transportSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (68)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
oxygen bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
fatty acid bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
toxic substance bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
antioxidant activityAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
pyridoxal phosphate bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
exogenous protein bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
enterobactin bindingAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid bindingUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronosyltransferase activityUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
sodium-independent organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (41)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum lumenAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
platelet alpha granule lumenAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
blood microparticleAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAlbuminHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
membraneUDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (106)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID540299A screen for compounds that inhibit the MenB enzyme of Mycobacterium tuberculosis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 20, Issue:21
Synthesis and SAR studies of 1,4-benzoxazine MenB inhibitors: novel antibacterial agents against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
AID588519A screen for compounds that inhibit viral RNA polymerase binding and polymerization activities2011Antiviral research, Sep, Volume: 91, Issue:3
High-throughput screening identification of poliovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitors.
AID731531Half life in simulated gastric juice at 1 uM2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 23, Issue:5
Discovery of olmesartan hexetil: a new potential prodrug of olmesartan.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1223385Prodrug conversion in human plasma assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID731530Half life in rat plasma at 1 uM2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 23, Issue:5
Discovery of olmesartan hexetil: a new potential prodrug of olmesartan.
AID1223389Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192QQ mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Mg2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID516519Tmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 20 mg/kg, po2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 20, Issue:19
Novel amides and esters prodrugs of olmesartan: Synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetic evaluation.
AID1223396Prodrug conversion in human serum albumin assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Zn2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223416Prodrug conversion in human serum LPDS assessed as conversion velocity per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of KPB2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID731529Half life in rat liver microsomes at 1 uM2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 23, Issue:5
Discovery of olmesartan hexetil: a new potential prodrug of olmesartan.
AID977604Ki values for sodium fluorescein (10 uM) uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1223403Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192RR mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223398Prodrug conversion in human plasma assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID754087Oral bioavailability in human2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 64Synthesis and pharmacological properties of a new hydrophilic and orally bioavailable 5-HT4 antagonist.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID699539Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID613235Cmax in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma at 20 mg/kg, po after 10 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 46, Issue:9
Design, synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetics evaluation of new ester prodrugs of olmesartan.
AID1223392Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192RR mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Mg2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID977600pIC50 values for sodium fluorescein (10 uM) uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1737435Agonist activity at human PPARgammaDEF receptor expressed in african green monkey COS7 cells transfected with pGal5-TK-pGL3/pRenilla-CMV assessed as intrinsic activity measured after 39 hrs by dual luciferase reporter assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID1223415Prodrug conversion in human serum LPDS assessed as conversion velocity per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Tris-HCl/Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223418Prodrug conversion in human serum LDL assessed as distribution of hydrolyzing activity measured per ml of serum at 10 uM in presence of Tris-HCl/Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1223406Prodrug conversion in human serum albumin assessed as hydrolysis by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID977599Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1223391Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192RR mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223405Ratio of Vmax to Km in recombinant human PON1 192RR mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1474009Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 20 to 40 mg, po QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1223407Prodrug conversion in human serum albumin assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1737437Cytotoxicity against African green monkey COS7 cells assessed as effect on metabolic activity at 20 uM measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID1223397Prodrug conversion in human plasma assessed as hydrolysis by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1473835Stimulation of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1223411Prodrug conversion in purified albumin (unknown origin) assessed as hydrolysis in presence of 4 fold anti-PON1 IgG/plasma ratio2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1737443Cytotoxicity against human HS5 cells assessed as cell death at 10 uM measured after 72 hrs by Propidium iodide stain based FACS analysis2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1223421Prodrug conversion in human serum LPDS assessed as distribution of hydrolyzing activity measured per ml of serum at 10 uM in presence of KPB2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1808091Drug metabolism in mini gut model assessed as metabolite formation by LC-MS/MS analysis2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-09, Volume: 64, Issue:23
Searching for New Microbiome-Targeted Therapeutics through a Drug Repurposing Approach.
AID1223413Prodrug conversion in human serum LDL assessed as conversion velocity at 10 uM measured per mg of protein in presence of Tris-HCl/Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223400Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192QQ mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223417Prodrug conversion in human serum VLDL and chylomicron assessed as distribution of hydrolyzing activity measured per ml of serum at 10 uM in presence of Tris-HCl/Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1474007Drug concentration at steady state in human at 20 to 40 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1808092Drug metabolism in human gut microbes assessed as metabolite formation by LC-MS/MS analysis2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-09, Volume: 64, Issue:23
Searching for New Microbiome-Targeted Therapeutics through a Drug Repurposing Approach.
AID1223412Prodrug conversion in human serum VLDL and chylomicron assessed as conversion velocity at 10 uM measured per mg of protein in presence of Tris-HCl/Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID613236Stability of the compound in rat liver microsomes assessed as half life at 1 uM by LC/MS/MS analysis2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 46, Issue:9
Design, synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetics evaluation of new ester prodrugs of olmesartan.
AID1223387Prodrug conversion in human plasma assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Zn2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID613234AUC (0 to last) in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma at 20 mg/kg, po after 10 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 46, Issue:9
Design, synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetics evaluation of new ester prodrugs of olmesartan.
AID699541Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1223388Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192QQ mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1808093Stability of compound in mini gut model at 24 hrs by LC-MS analysis2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 12-09, Volume: 64, Issue:23
Searching for New Microbiome-Targeted Therapeutics through a Drug Repurposing Approach.
AID1737436Cytotoxicity against African green monkey COS7 cells assessed as effect on metabolic activity at 10 uM measured after 72 hrs by MTT assay2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID977603pIC50 values for sodium fluorescein (10 uM) uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID731527Tmax in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as olmesartan at 20 mg/kg, po2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 23, Issue:5
Discovery of olmesartan hexetil: a new potential prodrug of olmesartan.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID516517Cmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 20 mg/kg, po2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 20, Issue:19
Novel amides and esters prodrugs of olmesartan: Synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetic evaluation.
AID1474008Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 20 to 40 mg, po QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1223404Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192RR mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells measured per mg of protein by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223414Prodrug conversion in human serum HDL assessed as conversion velocity per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Tris-HCl/Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1223410Prodrug conversion in human serum albumin assessed as hydrolysis in presence of 4 fold anti-PON1 IgG/plasma ratio2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223419Prodrug conversion in human serum HDL assessed as distribution of hydrolyzing activity measured per ml of serum at 10 uM in presence of Tris-HCl/Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID613239Tmax in Sprague-Dawley rat plasma at 20 mg/kg, po after 10 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 46, Issue:9
Design, synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetics evaluation of new ester prodrugs of olmesartan.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1223393Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192RR mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Zn2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1223386Prodrug conversion in human plasma assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Mg2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223402Ratio of Vmax to Km in recombinant human PON1 192QQ mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1737434Agonist activity at human PPARgammaDEF receptor expressed in african green monkey COS7 cells transfected with pGal5-TK-pGL3/pRenilla-CMV assessed as maximal activation at 10 uM measured after 39 hrs by dual luciferase reporter assay relative to pioglitazo2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 195Identification and development of non-cytotoxic cell death modulators: Impact of sartans and derivatives on PPARγ activation and on growth of imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
AID699540Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1223399Ratio of Vmax to Km in human plasma assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID731065AUClast in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as olmesartan at 20 mg/kg, po2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 23, Issue:5
Discovery of olmesartan hexetil: a new potential prodrug of olmesartan.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1223401Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192QQ mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells measured per mg of protein by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID613240Stability of the compound in simulated gastric juice assessed as half life at 1 uM by LC/MS/MS analysis2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 46, Issue:9
Design, synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetics evaluation of new ester prodrugs of olmesartan.
AID1474006AUC in human at 20 to 40 mg, po QD after 24 hrs2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1223390Prodrug conversion in recombinant human PON1 192QQ mutant expressed in FreeStyle 293-F cells assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Zn2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1474010Ratio of drug concentration at steady state in human at 20 to 40 mg, po QD after 24 hrs to IC50 for human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1223394Prodrug conversion in human serum albumin assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223408Ratio of Vmax to Km in human serum albumin assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein by single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID516520AUC (0 to last) in Sprague-Dawley rat at 20 mg/kg, po2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 20, Issue:19
Novel amides and esters prodrugs of olmesartan: Synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetic evaluation.
AID613237Stability of the compound in rat plasma assessed as half life at 1 uM by LC/MS/MS analysis2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Sep, Volume: 46, Issue:9
Design, synthesis, bioconversion, and pharmacokinetics evaluation of new ester prodrugs of olmesartan.
AID977602Inhibition of sodium fluorescein uptake in OATP1B3-transfected CHO cells at an equimolar substrate-inhibitor concentration of 10 uM2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID731528Cmax in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as olmesartan at 20 mg/kg, po2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-01, Volume: 23, Issue:5
Discovery of olmesartan hexetil: a new potential prodrug of olmesartan.
AID977601Ki values for sodium fluorescein (10 uM) uptake in OATP1B1-transfected CHO cells2013Molecular pharmacology, Jun, Volume: 83, Issue:6
Structure-based identification of OATP1B1/3 inhibitors.
AID1223420Prodrug conversion in human serum LPDS assessed as distribution of hydrolyzing activity measured per ml of serum at 10 uM in presence of Tris-HCl/Ca2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID1223395Prodrug conversion in human serum albumin assessed as hydrolysis measured per mg of protein at 10 uM in presence of Mg2+2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1223409Prodrug conversion in human plasma assessed as hydrolysis in presence of 4 fold anti-PON1 IgG/plasma ratio2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Feb, Volume: 40, Issue:2
Paraoxonase 1 as a major bioactivating hydrolase for olmesartan medoxomil in human blood circulation: molecular identification and contribution to plasma metabolism.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1159550Human Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) Inhibitor Screening2015Nature cell biology, Nov, Volume: 17, Issue:11
6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase links oxidative PPP, lipogenesis and tumour growth by inhibiting LKB1-AMPK signalling.
AID1346995Human AT1 receptor (Angiotensin receptors)2001Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension, Jun, Volume: 19, Issue:1
In vitro and in vivo pharmacology of olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin II type AT1 receptor antagonist.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (450)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's5 (1.11)18.2507
2000's218 (48.44)29.6817
2010's195 (43.33)24.3611
2020's32 (7.11)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 100.33

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index100.33 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.36 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.00 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index180.34 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (100.33)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials119 (25.93%)5.53%
Reviews70 (15.25%)6.00%
Case Studies11 (2.40%)4.05%
Observational7 (1.53%)0.25%
Other252 (54.90%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (102)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Phase IV Study for Effect of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control Using Anti-hypertensive Agents in Essential Hypertension With History of Stroke [NCT01198496]Phase 45,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-10-31Recruiting
Single Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg Film-coated Tablets in Healthy Adult Subjects Under Fasting Conditions. [NCT03951051]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-06Completed
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Compared to Olmesartan Medoxomil in Chinese Participants With Grade I or II Essential Hypertension [NCT02407210]Phase 3304 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Recruiting
Efficacy Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil on Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression and Epicardial Adipose Tissue(EAT) Volume Reduction in Patients With Coronary Atherosclerosis Detected by Coronary CT Angiography(CCTA) [NCT02360956]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-31Recruiting
An Open-label, Randomized, 2X2 Crossover Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Safety Between DWJ1351 and Co-administration of Amlodipine/Olmesartan and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Male Subjects [NCT03753477]Phase 164 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-22Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Rosuvastatin Combination Treatment in Patients With Concomitant Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia [NCT03009487]Phase 3265 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
A Multi-center, Prospective, Observational Study to Evaluate the Therapeutic Effectiveness and Safety of Olomax Tab. for Patients With Hypertension and Dyslipidemia [NCT05184179]7,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-12-01Enrolling by invitation
A Prospective, Open Label, Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Olmesartan Medoxomil Based Treatment Regimen in Type II Diabetic Patients With Hypertension [NCT00403481]Phase 4192 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Active Control, 3-parallel Group, Forced Titration, Multicenter, Phase IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan Versus Valsartan Monotherapy in Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension [NCT02495324]Phase 4369 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, 2-Period, 2-Treatment,2-Sequence, Crossover, Single-Dose BE of Olmesartan Medoxomil Tablets 40 mg [Torrent,India] Versus Benicar 40 mg Tablets [Daiichi Sankyo Inc., USA] in Healthy Subjects-Fed Condition. [NCT03319706]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Used as Add-on Therapy in Moderately to Severely Hypertensive Patients Not Adequately Controlled by Olmesartan Medoxomil (OM) 40 mg Monotherapy [NCT00430508]Phase 3972 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Comparison of the Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Nitrendipine on Systolic Blood Pressure in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients With Isolated Systolic Hypertension [NCT00751829]Phase 3417 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind Study To Compare The Effects Of Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Placebo In Patients With Established Atherosclerosis [NCT00382213]Phase 3210 participants Interventional2000-06-30Completed
Add-on Study of CCBs or Diuretics in Essential Hypertension Not Achieving Target Blood Pressure on Olmesartan Medoxomil Alone [NCT00858702]Phase 4105 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination 20/25 mg Versus 40/25 mg in Moderately to Severely Hypertensive Patients Not Adequately Controlled by Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg Monotherapy [NCT00430950]Phase 31,011 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A Prospective, Open Label, Single Arm Study to Evaluation the Safety and Efficacy of an Olmesartan Medoxomil Based Treatment Regimen in Elderly Patients With Hypertension [NCT00412932]Phase 4178 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Effects of Angiotensin-Receptor Blockade With Olmesartan on Carotid Atherosclerosis in Patients With Hypertension: The Confirmatory Olmesartan Plaque Regression Study [NCT01132768]Phase 4114 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment)
A TElmisartan and AMlodipine STudy to Assess the Cardiovascular PROTECTive Effects as Measured by Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypertensive at Risk Patients Beyond Blood Pressure [NCT01180205]Phase 4576 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-08-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-491 in Subjects With Essential Hypertension [NCT00696241]Phase 31,275 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized, Long-Term Comparison of the Safety and Tolerability of the TAK-491 Plus Chlorthalidone Fixed-Dose Combination vs. Olmesartan Medoxomil-Hydrochlorothiazide Fixed-Dose Combination in Subjects With Essential Hypertension [NCT00996281]Phase 3837 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Effect of Olmesartan Medoxomil on Arterial Stiffness and Thickness in Subjects With Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00676845]Phase 3133 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Post Marketing Surveillance, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Titrating, 4-Week Study Evaluating The Efficacy, Tolerability And Safety Of Olmesartan Medoxomil 20mg In Combination With 12.5mg Hydrochlorothiazide In Subjects With Stage 1 To Stage 2 Hypertens [NCT00796159]1,723 participants (Actual)Observational2007-07-31Completed
A Prospective, Open-label, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Dose Titration Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Olmesartan Medoxomil and Amlodipine Based Treatment Regimen in Hypertensive, Type 2 Diabetic Subjects [NCT00654745]Phase 4207 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Reduction Efficacy of OLOMAX for Blood Pressure and Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Hypertensive Patients With Dyslipidemia: a Multi-center-database Real-world Study [NCT05660135]4,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-06-20Recruiting
A Non-interventional, Multi Center, Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Effect of Improving Systolic Blood Pressure and Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Compared to Conventional Treatments and the Convenience of Taking Medication of Olostar [NCT05411887]3,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-06-20Recruiting
Comparison of the Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Losartan on Diastolic Blood Pressure in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients With Essential Hypertension. [NCT00751751]Phase 3441 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Vascular Improvement With Olmesartan Medoxomil Study [NCT00772499]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-30Completed
CS-866DM Phase 3 Clinical Study: A Double-Blind Controlled Trial in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy and Overt Proteinuria Secondary to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [NCT00141453]Phase 3577 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Association Between Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use and COVID-19 Severity and Mortality Among US Veterans [NCT04467931]22,213 participants (Actual)Observational2020-01-19Completed
Single-Dose Fed In Vivo Bioequivalence Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil Tablets (40 mg; Mylan) to Benicar® Tablets (40 mg; Sankyo) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00648219]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Single-Dose Fasting In Vivo Bioequivalence Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil Tablets (40 mg; Mylan) to Benicar® Tablets (40 mg; Sankyo) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00649623]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multi-center Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil Compared With Losartan Potassium in Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension [NCT00856271]Phase 3287 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
A Prospective, Open-label Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of an Olmesartan and Amlodipine Based Treatment Regimen in Subjects With Stage 1 and Stage 2 Hypertension [NCT00527514]Phase 3185 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A 24-Week Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Parallel Group Non-Inferiority Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Candesartan Cilexetil in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure (NYHA II-IV) [NCT00679484]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Lack of subject recruitment)
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing the TAK-491 Plus Chlorthalidone Fixed-Dose Combination vs Benicar HCT® (Olmesartan Medoxomil-Hydrochlorothiazide) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Essential Hypertension [NCT00846365]Phase 31,085 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
[NCT02561884]Phase 158 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Enrolling by invitation
A Prospective, Open-Label, Titration Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Safety of AZOR in Multiple Subgroups of Hypertensive Subjects Who Are Non-Responders to Anti-Hypertensive Monotherapy [NCT00791258]Phase 4999 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, With Olmesartan Medoxomil as Positive Control Parallel Clinical Study to Evaluate the the Safety and Efficacy of Azilsartan in Chinese Patients With Primary Mild and Moderate Hypertension [NCT02609490]Phase 3304 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Prognostic Value of the Circadian Pattern of Ambulatory Blood Pressure for Multiple Risk Assessment [NCT00741585]Phase 421,983 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-01Completed
A Phase 3b, Double-Blind, Randomized, 12-Week Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing the TAK-491 Plus Chlorthalidone Fixed-Dose Combination vs Olmesartan Medoxomil-Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hypertension [NCT01033071]Phase 31,071 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
AN OPEN LABEL, NON-INTERVENTIONAL STUDY OF THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND EFFICACY OF AMLODIPINE AND OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL (NORMETECTM) IN FILIPINO PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION: A POST MARKETING SURVEILLANCE STUDY [NCT01200407]615 participants (Actual)Observational2010-06-09Terminated(stopped due to The requirement for Post Marketing Surveillance was lifted by the Philippine FDA)
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DWJ1451 in Patients With Hypertension and Dyslipidemia [NCT04161001]Phase 3237 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-20Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Co-Administration of a Triple Combination Therapy of Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine Besylate and Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With Hypertension [NCT00649389]Phase 32,500 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Randomised, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Co-Administration of Triple Combinations of Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine Besylate, and Hydrochlorothiazide Compared With Corresponding Olmesartan - Amlodipine Combination [NCT00923091]Phase 32,689 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Effect of Olmesartan Medoxomil on Vascular Markers in Hypertensive Patients With Metabolic Syndrome [NCT00891267]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Single-Dose Fed Bioequivalence Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets (40 mg/25 mg; Mylan) to Benicar HCT® Tablets (40 mg/25 mg; Sankyo) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01019590]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Single-Dose Fasting Bioequivalence Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets (40 mg/25 mg; Mylan) to Benicar HCT® Tablets (40 mg/25 mg; Sankyo) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT01020214]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-comparator, 8-week Forced-titration Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Losartan Potassium in Hypertensive Subjects [NCT00949884]Phase 4941 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Single Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil/Hydrochlorothiazide 40 mg/25 mg Film-Coated Tablets in Healthy Adult Subjects / Fasting State [NCT04138888]Phase 132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-31Recruiting
An Exploratory Study of CS-3150 to Evaluate the Relation Between Antihypertensive Effect and Baseline Factors Compared to Olmesartan Medoxomil in Patients With Essential Hypertension [NCT02848170]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Add-on Study of Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients With Moderate to Severe Hypertension Not Achieving Target Blood Pressure on Olmesartan/Amlodipine Alone [NCT00902538]Phase 32,204 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
An Open-label Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil (CS-866) in Normotensive Patients With Chronic Glomerulonephritis or Diabetic Nephropathy [NCT00914524]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
An Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of a 4 Week Therapy With the Fixed Dose Combination of Amlodipine 10 mg Plus Valsartan 160 mg in Hypertensive Patients Not Adequately Responding to a 4 Week Therapy With the Free C [NCT00523744]Phase 3257 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Treat-to-Target Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil and an Add-on Treatment Algorithm Consisting of Hydrochlorothiazide and Amlodipine Besylate in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension [NCT00311155]Phase 4694 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Clinical Trial of Renin Profiling in Selection of Initial Antihypertensive Drug [NCT00834600]185 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil Compared With Losartan in Patients With Hypertension and Mild to Moderate Renal Impairment [NCT00151827]Phase 3393 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Additional Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil 20mg / Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg in the Treatment of Chinese Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension [NCT00872586]Phase 3304 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Prospective, Multicentric, Open Clinic Essay to Evaluate the Use of OLMETEC® (Olmesartan Medoxomile) and OLMETEC PLUS® (Olmesartan Medoxomile Hydrochlorothiazide) in Stade I and II, According to JNC VII [NCT00811226]450 participants (Anticipated)Observational2007-04-30Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Different Antihypertensive Drugs in Patients With Hypertension and Obstructive Sleep Apnea [NCT01028534]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of an Olmesartan Medoxomil Based Treatment Regimen to Placebo in Patients With Stage I and Stage II Hypertension [NCT00430638]Phase 4278 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Effect of Probenecid on Pharmacokinetics, and Tolerability of Olmesartan in Healthy Chinese Volunteers [NCT01907373]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
The Japan-Combined Treatment With Olmesartan and a Calcium Channel Blocker Versus Olmesartan and Diuretics Randomized Efficacy Study (J-CORE) [NCT00607035]Phase 4220 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Multiple-Dose, Cross-over Clinical Study to Investigate Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interaction Between Rosuvastatin and CS-866 in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT01415466]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
The Relative Effects of Single Doses of Olmesartan Medoxomil, Irbesartan and Valsartan at High Dosage Levels on the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Healthy Normal Subjects [NCT00185055]Phase 420 participants Interventional2004-11-30Completed
The Effects of Olmesartan Medoxomil, Losartan Potassium, and Atenolol on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Subjects With Hypertension [NCT00185094]Phase 460 participants Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Factorial Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Co-administration of Olmesartan Medoxomil Plus Amlodipine Compared to Monotherapy in Patients With Mild to Severe Hypertension [NCT00185133]Phase 31,900 participants Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil and Its Combination With Hydrochlorothiazide Compared With an ACE Inhibitor and Its Combination With a Calcium Channel Blocker in Patients With Stage 2 Hypertension [NCT00185120]Phase 4152 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Randomized Olmesartan and Diabetes Microalbuminuria Prevention Study (ROADMAP) [NCT00185159]Phase 34,449 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
Add-on Study of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Patients With Moderate to Severe Hypertension Not Achieving Target Blood Pressure on Amlodipine 5 mg Alone [NCT00220233]Phase 3632 participants Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Open Label, Single-Dose, 2-Way Cross-over Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Combination of Rosuvastatin and CS-866 and DWJ1276 in Healthy Male Volunteers [NCT01493856]Phase 158 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Combination of OLMesartan and Calcium Channel Blocker or Low Dose Diuretics in High Risk Elderly Hypertensive Patients Study (COLM-Study) [NCT00454662]Phase 45,141 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Multi-Omics to Predict the Blood Pressure Response to Antihypertensives [NCT05917275]Phase 496 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
[NCT01831479]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
An Open Label, Randomized, 2-Period, 2-Treatment,2-Sequence, Crossover, Single-Dose BE of FDC of Olmesaartan Medoxomil, Amlopdipine and Hydrochlorothiazide (40+10+25) mg Tab [Torrent,India] Vs Tribenzor(40+10+25) mg Tab [ Daichi Sankyo, Inc USA] in Health [NCT02962336]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
The Study Comparing the Incidence of Cardiovascular Events Between High-dose ARB Monotherapy and Combination Therapy With ARB and Calcium Channel Blocker in Japanese Elderly Hypertensive Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk [NCT00134160]Phase 41,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan: Reduction of Blood Pressure in the Treatment of Patients Suffering From Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension [NCT00185172]Phase 32,333 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Amlodipine Used as add-on Therapy in Moderately to Severely Hypertensive Patients Not Adequately Controlled by Olmesartan Medoxomil 20 mg Monotherapy [NCT00220220]Phase 3429 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study to Compare Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of the TAK-491 and Chlorthalidone Fixed-Dose Combination Versus Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide Fixed-Dose Combination in Hypertensive Subjects With Moderate [NCT01309828]Phase 3153 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
A Prospective, Open Label, Titration Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Benicar® and Benicar ®HCT in Patients With Stage II Systolic Hypertension [NCT00185068]Phase 4110 participants Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Multi-Centre Olmesartan Atherosclerosis Regression Evaluation (MORE) [NCT00185185]Phase 3165 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Supplemental Benefit of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker in Hypertensive Patients With Stable Heart Failure Using Olmesartan (SUPPORT Trial) [NCT00417222]Phase 31,145 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter, Phase III, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Fixed-dose Combination of Olmesartan + Indapamide When Compared to the Isolated Drugs in the Treatment of Hypertension. [NCT05110898]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-01Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Triple Fixed Dose Combination Therapy With Olmesartan Medoxomil 20mg, Amlodipine 5mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg in Patients With Hypertension Not Controlled With D [NCT01838850]Phase 3344 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Angiotensin II Blockade and Adipose Tissue Inflammation in Obesity [NCT01684748]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
National, Multicenter, Open-Label and Prospective Study Assessment of Efficacy and Safety in Stage 1 and 2 Essential Hypertension With Olmesartan Medoxomil Based Treatment Algorithm From Monotherapy to Association With Hydrochlorothiazide and Amlodipine B [NCT00890591]Phase 4144 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
"A Multi-center, Double Blind, Efficacy, and Safety Study of the Oral Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Olmesartan Medoxomil Versus Losartan in Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension" [NCT00857285]Phase 3130 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of the New Association on Fixed Dose of Olmesartan Medoxomil + Chlorthalidone (40mg + 12.5mg and 40mg + 25mg) Compared With BENICAR HCT® in Hypertension Control [NCT02483936]Phase 3348 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-30Not yet recruiting
An Open-label Study of the Single-dose Pharmacokinetics of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Pediatric Patients With Hypertension [NCT00151814]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of a Sequential Therapy Change From Candesartan 32 mg to the Fixed Combination of Olmesartan 40 mg/Amlodipine 10 mg in Patients With Poorly Controlled Moderate Hypertension - an Open Phase IV Trial [NCT01611077]Phase 488 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, 52-week Study to Evaluate the Effect of LCZ696 Compared to Olmesartan on Regional Aortic Stiffness in Subjects With Essential Hypertension [NCT01870739]Phase 2115 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, 8-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 in Comparison to Olmesartan in Patients With Essential Hypertension [NCT01785472]Phase 31,438 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
Effect of Different Doses of Olmesartan Medoxomil Compared to Losartan on Proteinuria, Renal Function and Inflammatory Markers in Type 2 Diabetics With Nephropathy [NCT00362960]Phase 3300 participants Interventional2003-05-31Completed
Lowering Blood Pressure in Primary Care in Vienna [NCT02377661]Phase 4229 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Effect of Olmesartan or Amlodipine on Serum Angiotensin(1-7) Levels and Vascular Functions in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension [NCT05189015]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-01-01Completed
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of the New Association on Fixed Dose of Olmesartan + Chlorthalidone, Produced by EMS S.A,in Arterial Hypertension Control [NCT02493322]Phase 3261 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-30Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind 52-week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an LCZ696 Regimen Compared to an Olmesartan Regimen on Arterial Stiffness Through Assessment of Central Blood Pressure in Elderly Patients With Hypertension [NCT01692301]Phase 2454 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Phase I Clinical Trial to Compare and Evaluate Safety and Pharmacokinetic Characteristics After Administration of ATB-101 or Co-administration of ATB-1011 and ATB-1012 in Healthy Adult Volunteers [NCT05017987]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-19Completed
A Randomized 8-week Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 200 mg in Comparison With Olmesartan 20 mg in Essential Hypertensive Patients Not Responsive to Olmesartan [NCT01876368]Phase 3376 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
The Effect of Rosuvastatin and Olmesartan on the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease by Smart Angioplasty Research Team: SMART-ROAD Trial [NCT02516826]Phase 2504 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Not yet recruiting
An Open Label, Randomized, 2-Period, 2-Treatment,2-Sequence, Crossover, Single-Dose BE of Olmesartan Medoxomil Tablets 40 mg [Torrent,India] Versus Benicar 40 mg Tablets [Daiichi Sankyo Inc., USA] in Healthy Subjects-Fasted Condition [NCT03318354]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil in Children and Adolescents With Hypertension [NCT00151775]Phase 2/Phase 3362 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of s086 Tablets in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension:a Randomized,Double-blind,Placebo-controlled,Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial [NCT05033535]Phase 210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00141453 (4) [back to overview]Renal Composite Outcomes
NCT00141453 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Composite Outcomes
NCT00141453 (4) [back to overview]Reciprocal (1/Serum Creatinine) of Serum Creatinine
NCT00141453 (4) [back to overview]The Change in Proteinuria
NCT00151775 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Period 3 Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 3
NCT00151775 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Period 3 Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 3
NCT00151775 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 4 (End of Study)
NCT00151775 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 4 (End of Study)
NCT00151775 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 2 (3 Weeks)
NCT00151775 (6) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure to the End of Period 2 (3 Weeks)
NCT00151814 (8) [back to overview]For Olmesartan, the Elimination Half-life of the Drug in Plasma
NCT00151814 (8) [back to overview]For Olmesartan, the Elimination Constant Rate
NCT00151814 (8) [back to overview]For Olmesartan, the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC 0-t)
NCT00151814 (8) [back to overview]For Olmesartan, the Apparent Oral Volume of Distribution
NCT00151814 (8) [back to overview]For Olmesartan, the Apparent Oral Clearance
NCT00151814 (8) [back to overview]For Olmesartan, Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time of the Dose to Infinity
NCT00151814 (8) [back to overview]Foe Olmesartan, the Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration
NCT00151814 (8) [back to overview]For Olmesartan, the Maximum Plasma Concentration Over the Entire Sampling Phase
NCT00311155 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Systolic Responders Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to the Completion of the Treatment During Which Blood Pressure Goals Were Achieved
NCT00311155 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Were Diastolic Responders Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to the Completion of Treatment During Which Blood Pressure Goals Were Achieved.
NCT00311155 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Normalized Blood Pressure Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to Completion of the Treatment During Which Blood Pressure Goals Were Achieved
NCT00311155 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change in Systolic Blood Pressure Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to the Completion of the Treatment
NCT00311155 (6) [back to overview]Mean Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to the Completion of the Treatment
NCT00311155 (6) [back to overview]The Percentage of Participants Treated to Target Blood Pressure Goals Overall and for Each Treatment Step From Baseline to Completion of Treatment During Which the Goal Was Achieved.
NCT00403481 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 4 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period.
NCT00403481 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 6 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period.
NCT00403481 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory BP (Diastolic)
NCT00403481 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Systolic BP (SBP) as Measured by 24-hour ABPM.
NCT00403481 (9) [back to overview]Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period.
NCT00403481 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (Systolic).
NCT00403481 (9) [back to overview]Change in Ambulatory BP (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last (Week 12 ) 4 and 6 Hours of the Last 24-hour Dosing Period.
NCT00403481 (9) [back to overview]Change in Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00403481 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12) 24-hour Dosing Period.
NCT00412932 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.
NCT00412932 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment
NCT00412932 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am-4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10 Pm-6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitored Diastolic Blood Pressure After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment
NCT00412932 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am-4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10pm-6am)Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment
NCT00412932 (7) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Achieved Mean 24-hour Ambluatory Blood Pressure of <140/90 mm Hg, Systolic Blood Pressure <140 mm Hg, and Diastolic Blood Pressure <90 mm Hg After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment
NCT00412932 (7) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Achieved Mean Daytime (8am - 4pm) Ambulatory Blood Pressure of <140/90 mm Hg, Systolic Blood Pressure <140 mm Hg, and Diastolic Blood Pressure <90 mm Hg After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.
NCT00412932 (7) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Achieved Mean Nighttime (10pm - 6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure of <140/90 mm Hg, Systolic Blood Pressure <140 mm Hg, and Diastolic Blood Pressure <90 mm Hg After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.
NCT00430508 (8) [back to overview]Change in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16.
NCT00430508 (8) [back to overview]Change in Mean Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16.
NCT00430508 (8) [back to overview]Change in Mean Night-time Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16.
NCT00430508 (8) [back to overview]Change in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 12.
NCT00430508 (8) [back to overview]Change in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16
NCT00430508 (8) [back to overview]Change in Mean Trough Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 12.
NCT00430508 (8) [back to overview]Change in Mean Trough Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16.
NCT00430508 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Target Blood Pressure at Week 16
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Black Participants.
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) After 12 Weeks of Randomized Treatment as Measured by Omron Device.
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) After 12 Weeks of Randomized Treatment as Measured by Omron Device.
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Non-Black Participants.
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Females.
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Males.
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Stage 2 Hypertensives
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Stage 1 Hypertensives
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Participants Less Than 65 Years Old.
NCT00430638 (10) [back to overview]The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Participants Greater Than or Equal to 65 Years Old.
NCT00430950 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00430950 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 12
NCT00430950 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Goal.
NCT00430950 (5) [back to overview]Change in Daytime, Nighttime and 24-hour Blood Pressure Evaluated by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring 8 Weeks After Baseline.
NCT00430950 (5) [back to overview]Change in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure 4 Weeks and 8 Weeks After Baseline.
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Change in Sitting Pulse Pressure During the Core Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) During the Extension Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Normalized Blood Pressure During the Extension Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Normalized Blood Pressure During the Core Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) During the Extension Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) During the Core Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) During the Core Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Protocol-defined Blood Pressure Response During the Extension Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Protocol-defined Blood Pressure Response During the Core Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Change in Sitting Pulse Rate During the Extension Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Change in Sitting Pulse Rate During the Core Phase of the Study
NCT00523744 (12) [back to overview]Change in Sitting Pulse Pressure During the Extension Phase of the Study
NCT00527514 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure for the Amlodipine 5mg + Olmesartan 40 mg Group
NCT00527514 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure for the Amlodipine 5mg Group.
NCT00527514 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00527514 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Monitoring
NCT00527514 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure for the Amlodipine 10 mg + Olmesartan 40 mg Group
NCT00527514 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure for the Amlodipine 5mg + Olmesartan 20 mg Group.
NCT00649389 (4) [back to overview]Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00649389 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Reached Blood Pressure Goal (<140/90 mmHg; <130/80 mmHg for Subjects With Diabetes, Chronic Renal Disease, or Chronic Cardiovascular Disease)by 12 Weeks
NCT00649389 (4) [back to overview]Change in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12 or Early Termination
NCT00649389 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP).
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 2 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Nighttime Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 3
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 6
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 15
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Daytime Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean 24 Hour Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Change in Mean Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SeSBP) From Week 0 (Baseline) After 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 Weeks
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Change in Mean Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP) From Week 0 (Baseline) After 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 Weeks
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Change From Week 0 (Baseline) in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Change From Week 0 (Baseline) in Mean ABPM Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 18
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 3
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Change From Week 0 (Baseline) in Mean ABPM SBP After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 9
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 18
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 6
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 9
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 15
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 2 Hour Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 4 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 4 Hour Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 6 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12
NCT00654745 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 6 Hour Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as < 90 mm Hg and/or Reduction From Baseline ≥ 10 mm Hg
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as < 140 mm Hg and/or Reduction From Baseline ≥ 20 mm Hg
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both a Clinic Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure Response
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00696241 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Change in Mean Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean Nighttime Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Asain Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Asian Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Asian Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Asian Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Elderly Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Elderly Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Elderly Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Elderly Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Hispanic Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Hispanic Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Hispanic Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Hispanic Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Obese Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Obese Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Obese Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Obese Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean 24-hour Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean 24-hour Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean Daytime Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean Daytime Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean Nighttime Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on a Beta Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on a Beta Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on a Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on a Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on a Diuretic Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]The Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve BP Goal (<140/90 mmHg for Non-diabetics or <130/80 mmHg for Diabetics) From Baseline to 12 and 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on a Diuretic Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal (<140 mm Hg for Non-diabetics and <130 mm Hg for Diabetics) From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]The Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seated Diastolic BP Goal (<90 mmHg for Non-diabetics or < 80 mmHg for Subjects With Diabetes) From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Values
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Values
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Change in Mean Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on a Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks
NCT00791258 (59) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Previously on a Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daytime Mean (6am to 10pm) Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Daytime Mean (6am to 10pm) Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 12-hr Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 12-hr Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as <140 mm Hg for Participants Without Diabetes or CKD or <130 mm Hg for Participants With Diabetes or CKD
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nighttime Mean (12am to 6am) Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Nighttime Mean (12am to 6am) Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Diastolic AND Systolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as <140/90 mm Hg for Participants Without Diabetes or Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) or <130/80 mm Hg for Participants With Diabetes or CKD
NCT00846365 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as Defined as <90 mm Hg for Participants Without Diabetes or CKD or <80 mm Hg for Participants With Diabetes or CKD
NCT00857285 (1) [back to overview]Mean Change of Sitting dBP From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00858702 (3) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Achieving Target Sitting Blood Pressure of Less Than 130/85
NCT00858702 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Drug-related Adverse Events (Subjective Symptoms/Objective Findings)
NCT00858702 (3) [back to overview]Percent of Patients With Drug-related Adverse Events (Laboratory Changes in Clinical Laboratory Values)
NCT00890591 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Achieved a Blood Pressure Goal of Less Than 130/85 in First Titrated Group (Olmesartan 20 mg + 12.5 mg Hydrochlorothiazide)
NCT00890591 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Achieved a Blood Pressure Goal of Less Than 130/85 in Third Titrated Group (Olmesartan + Hydrochorothiazide + Amlodipine)
NCT00890591 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Achieved a Blood Pressure Goal of Less Than 130/85 in Second Titrated Group (Olmesartan 40 mg + 25 mg Hydrochlorothiazide)
NCT00890591 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Achieved a Blood Pressure Goal of Less Than 130/85 (Olmesartan 20 mg Monotherapy)
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]Change in 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure Assessed by 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP) of the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg vs. OM/AML 40/10 mg
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]In Non-responders, the Change in 24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure Assessed by 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]In Non-responders, the Change in 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure Assessed by 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]In Non-responders, the Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Associated With the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg.
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]In Non-responders, the Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Associated With the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg.
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SeSBP) of the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg vs. OM/AML 40/10 mg
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Achieving Blood Pressure (BP) Goal at Week 16.
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]Change in 24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Assessed by 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (ABPM).
NCT00902538 (10) [back to overview]In Non-responders, the Number of Subject Meeting Their Blood Pressure Goals Associated With the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg.
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 22 to Week 26
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 18 to Week 22
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP).
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP) During Open-Label Period VI (Titration Effect From OM/AML/HCTZ 40/5/25 to 40/10/25.
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP).
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Week 18 to Week 22
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Week 22 to Week 26
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Goal at Week 10
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Goal at Week 26
NCT00923091 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Goal From Week 18 to Week 22
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Incremental Change From Week 4 to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SSBP)
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 4
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 8
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Blood Pressure During the Final 2, 4, and 6 Hours of the Dosing Interval at Week 4
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Blood Pressure During the Final 2, 4, and 6 Hours of the Dosing Interval at Week 8
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am to 4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10pm to 6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 4
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am to 4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10pm to 6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 8
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Blood Pressure
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Ambulatory Blood Pressure Goal of < 135/85 mmHg at Week 8
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Goals at Week 4
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Goals at Week 8
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SDBP)
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SSBP)
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SDBP)
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SSBP)
NCT00949884 (16) [back to overview]Incremental Change From Week 4 to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SDBP)
NCT00996281 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event
NCT00996281 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Serum Creatinine Elevations Greater Than 50% From Baseline and Greater Than the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reached Target Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure of <140 mm Hg and/or Reduction of ≥20 mm Hg From Baseline.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Who Reached Target Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure of <140 mm Hg and/or Reduction of ≥20 mm Hg From Baseline and Target Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure of <90 mm Hg and/or Reduction of ≥10 mm Hg From Baseline.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Nighttime (12 AM to 6 AM) Systolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Nighttime (12 AM to 6 AM) Diastolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (6 AM to 10 PM) Systolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (6 AM to 10 PM) Diastolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Reached Target Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure of <90 mm Hg and/or Reduction of ≥10 mm Hg From Baseline.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Systolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Mean Systolic Blood Pressure During Each Hour of the 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure During Each Hour of the 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Mean Systolic Blood Pressure at 0 to 12 Hours After Dosing by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure at 0 to 12 Hours After Dosing by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01033071 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Diastolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.
NCT01200407 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving JNC VII Recommended Blood Pressure Goal at Week 12 With LOCF
NCT01200407 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP at Week 12 With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT01200407 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 Without (w/o) LOCF
NCT01200407 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT01309828 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants at Final Visit Who Achieve Target Systolic Blood Pressure <130 mm Hg
NCT01309828 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants at Final Visit Who Achieved Both a Clinic Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Response
NCT01309828 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants at Final Visit Who Achieved Target Diastolic Blood Pressure <80 mm Hg
NCT01309828 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE)
NCT01684748 (2) [back to overview]Insulin Sensitivity by Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Testing (Change Over Time)
NCT01684748 (2) [back to overview]Collagen Gene Expression in Skeletal Muscle (Change Over Time)
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure (maSBP)
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure (maDBP)
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Pulse Pressure (maPP)
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Central Aortic Systolic Pressure (CASP) at 52 Weeks
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Central Aortic Systolic Pressure (CASP) at 12 Weeks
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Pulse Pressure (msPP)
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP)
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP)
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Central Pulse (CPP) Pressure
NCT01692301 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Death as Assessment of Safety and Tolerability
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Sub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure in Dippers.
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Sub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure in Non-dippers.
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Sub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure in Dippers.
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mg
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Between LCZ696 200, and LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mg
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Ambulatory Pulse Pressure
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 200 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mg
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Sub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure in Non-dippers.
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressure (msPP)
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Successful Blood Pressure Control
NCT01785472 (13) [back to overview]Number of Responders
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Augmentation Index at 52 Weeks
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Ascending Aorta Distensibility at 52 Week
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Distal Descending Aorta Distensibility at 52 Weeks
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Reported Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Local Aortic Strain at 52 Weeks
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Central Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Regional Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity at 52 Weeks
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Proximal Descending Aorta Distensibility at 52 Weeks
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Carotid-femoral Pulse Wave Velocity at 52 Weeks
NCT01870739 (10) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Augmentation Pressure at 52 Weeks
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (maSBP)
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (maDBP)
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP)
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP)
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressure
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Control
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Response
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Response
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Successful Overall Blood Pressure Control
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Total Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death
NCT01876368 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Control

Renal Composite Outcomes

first occurrence of any of the following events: Doubling of serum creatinine level; Death; End stage renal disease (NCT00141453)
Timeframe: Randomization to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Olmesartan Medoxomil116
Placebo Comparator129

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Cardiovascular Composite Outcomes

Number of participants experiencing the first occurence of any of the following: Cardiovascular death; non-fatal stroke; non-fatal myocardial infarction; hospitalization for unstable angina; lower extremity amputation; coronary/carotid/peripheral revascularization. (NCT00141453)
Timeframe: Within 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Olmesartan Medoxomil40
Placebo Comparator53

[back to top]

Reciprocal (1/Serum Creatinine) of Serum Creatinine

The amount of serum creatinine was determined by blood tests periodically during the study. The amount of creatinine is an indication of kidney function. The reciprocal of serum creatinine is used in an equation to determine the change in kidney function from baseline. The reciprocal of the serum creatinine was monitored to detect kidney function changes over duration of the study. (NCT00141453)
Timeframe: Randomization to 5 years

InterventiondL/mg/year (Median)
Olmesartan Medoxomil-0.071
Placebo Comparator-0.089

[back to top]

The Change in Proteinuria

The median percentage change from baseline value in urinary protein:creatinine ratio (NCT00141453)
Timeframe: Randomization to 5 years

,
InterventionMedian percentage change in ratio (Number)
12-week value48-week value144 -week value
Olmesartan Medoxomil-19.5-20.0-24.9
Placebo Comparator12.66.93.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Period 3 Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 3

Mean change from period 3 baseline (completion of the dose adjustment period and prior to starting the treatment of period 3) to the end of period 3 (double-blind placebo-controlled period) in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings for Cohort C. (NCT00151775)
Timeframe: Week 3 (period 3 baseline) to week 5 (end of Period 3)

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Seated Systolic Blood PressureSeated Diastolic Blood Pressure
Cohort C: OM Period 31.360.31
Cohort C: Placebo Period 34.953.77

[back to top]

Mean Change From Period 3 Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 3

Mean change from period 3 baseline (completion of the dose adjustment period and prior to starting the treatment of period 3) to the end of period 3 (double-blind placebo-controlled period) in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings for Cohort A, Cohort B and Cohorts A+B combined. (NCT00151775)
Timeframe: Week 3 (period 3 baseline) to week 5 (end of Period 3)

,,,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change in Systolic Blood PressureChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Cohort A: OM Period 30.430.24
Cohort A: Placebo Period 34.934.43
Cohort B: OM Period 31.371.94
Cohort B: Placebo Period 33.793.25
Cohorts A + B: OM Period 30.770.85
Cohorts A + B: Placebo Period 34.503.99

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 4 (End of Study)

Mean change from baseline to the end of the open label Period 4 in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings for Cohort C. (NCT00151775)
Timeframe: Day 0 to week 51 week (end of study)

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change in Systolic Blood PressureChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Cohort C: OM (Olmesartan Medoxomil)-15.7-13.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 4 (End of Study)

Mean change from baseline to the end of the open label Period 4 in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings for Cohort A, Cohort B and Cohorts A+B combined. (NCT00151775)
Timeframe: Day 0 to week 51 (end of study)

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change in Systolic Blood PressureChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Cohort A: Period 4 Open-label OM-10.8-7.4
Cohort B: Period 4 Open-label OM-7.7-5.1
Cohorts A + B: Period 4 Open-label OM-9.7-6.6

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements to the End of Period 2 (3 Weeks)

Mean change from baseline to the end of the dose ranging period in systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings for Cohort A, Cohort B and Cohorts A+B combined. (NCT00151775)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline) to 3 weeks

,,,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change in Systolic Blood PressureChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Cohort A: High Dose OM-12.58-9.50
Cohort A: Low Dose OM-7.76-5.52
Cohort B: High Dose OM-10.68-7.58
Cohort B: Low Dose OM-4.73-3.49
Cohorts A + B: High Dose OM-11.87-8.78
Cohorts A + B: Low Dose OM-6.63-4.76

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure to the End of Period 2 (3 Weeks)

The efficacy dose response change in trough seated systolic blood pressure (both non-weight adjusted and weight adjusted results) from baseline to the end of the dose-ranging period (Period 2). Non-weight adjusted dose was the fixed olmesartan medoxomil dose; weight adjusted dose calculated mg of olmesartan medoxomil per kg of weight at baseline. (NCT00151775)
Timeframe: Day 0 to 3 weeks

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Non-weight adjusted dosageWeight adjusted dosage
Cohort A-0.69-8.97
Cohort B-0.85-7.17
Cohorts A + B-0.75-8.36

[back to top]

For Olmesartan, the Elimination Half-life of the Drug in Plasma

(NCT00151814)
Timeframe: PK samples were collected pre-dose and at 1,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after dosing

Interventionhr (Mean)
6-12 Years of Age Olmesartan Group8.4
13-16 Years of Age Olmesartan Group9.1

[back to top]

For Olmesartan, the Elimination Constant Rate

(NCT00151814)
Timeframe: PK samples were collected pre-dose and at 1,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after dosing

InterventionL/hr (Mean)
6-12 Years of Age Olmesartan Group0.090
13-16 Years of Age Olmesartan Group0.079

[back to top]

For Olmesartan, the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC 0-t)

(NCT00151814)
Timeframe: PK samples were collected pre-dose and at 1,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after dosing

Interventionng/mL*hr (Mean)
6-12 Years of Age Olmesartan Group7874
13-16 Years of Age Olmesartan Group5851

[back to top]

For Olmesartan, the Apparent Oral Volume of Distribution

(NCT00151814)
Timeframe: PK samples were collected pre-dose and at 1,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after dosing

InterventionL (Mean)
6-12 Years of Age Olmesartan Group50.9
13-16 Years of Age Olmesartan Group81.3

[back to top]

For Olmesartan, the Apparent Oral Clearance

(NCT00151814)
Timeframe: PK samples were collected pre-dose and at 1,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after dosing

InterventionL/hr (Mean)
6-12 Years of Age Olmesartan Group4.3
13-16 Years of Age Olmesartan Group6.1

[back to top]

For Olmesartan, Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From the Time of the Dose to Infinity

(NCT00151814)
Timeframe: PK samples were collected pre-dose and at 1,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after dosing

Interventionng/mL*hr (Mean)
6-12 Years of Age Olmesartan Group7988
13-16 Years of Age Olmesartan Group5982

[back to top]

Foe Olmesartan, the Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration

(NCT00151814)
Timeframe: PK samples were collected pre-dose and at 1,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after dosing

Interventionhr (Mean)
6-12 Years of Age Olmesartan Group2.8
13-16 Years of Age Olmesartan Group2.5

[back to top]

For Olmesartan, the Maximum Plasma Concentration Over the Entire Sampling Phase

(NCT00151814)
Timeframe: PK samples were collected pre-dose and at 1,2,4,8,12,24,48 hours after dosing

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
6-12 Years of Age Olmesartan Group1227
13-16 Years of Age Olmesartan Group895

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Systolic Responders Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to the Completion of the Treatment During Which Blood Pressure Goals Were Achieved

Systolic responders defined as a participant who is a normaliser or has a lowering of the mean sitting systolic blood pressure of ≥20 mmHg at trough (NCT00311155)
Timeframe: Baseline to ≤20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Overall N=691OLM 20 mg N=688OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg N=580OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg N=446OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 5 mg N=296OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 10 mg N=176
Olmesartan+Hydrochlorothiazide,if Needed+Amlodipine, if Needed92.634.249.646.633.320.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Were Diastolic Responders Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to the Completion of Treatment During Which Blood Pressure Goals Were Achieved.

Diastolic responders were defined as a participant who is a normaliser or has a lowering of the mean sitting diastolic blood pressure of ≥10 mmHg at trough. (NCT00311155)
Timeframe: Baseline to ≤20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Overall N=691OLM 20 mg N=688OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg N=580OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg N=446OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 5 mg N=296OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 10 mg N=176
Olmesartan+Hydrochlorothiazide,if Needed+Amlodipine, if Needed93.336.652.448.633.420.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Normalized Blood Pressure Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to Completion of the Treatment During Which Blood Pressure Goals Were Achieved

Normalized blood pressure is defined as a mean sitting systolic blood (sBP) pressure at trough of <140 mmHg and mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (dBP)of <90 mmHg for non-diabetic patients or a mean sitting sBP at trough of <130 mmHg and mean sitting dBP <80 mmHg for diabetic patients. (NCT00311155)
Timeframe: Baseline to ≤20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Overall N=691OLM 20 mg N=688OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg N=580OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg N=446OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 5 mg N=296OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 10 mg N=176
Olmesartan+Hydrochlorothiazide,if Needed+Amlodipine, if Needed84.522.731.132.723.914.8

[back to top]

Mean Change in Systolic Blood Pressure Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to the Completion of the Treatment

(NCT00311155)
Timeframe: Baseline to ≤20 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall N=691OLM 20 mg N=688OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg N=580OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg N=446OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 5 mg N=296OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 10 mg N=176
Olmesartan+Hydrochlorothiazide,if Needed+Amlodipine, if Needed-29.58-11.97-19.55-24.51-27.06-28.02

[back to top]

Mean Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure Overall and for Each Treatment From Baseline to the Completion of the Treatment

(NCT00311155)
Timeframe: Baseline to ≤20 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall N=691OLM 20 mg N=688OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg N=580OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg N=446OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 5 mg N=296OLM 20 mg + HCTZ 25 mg + AML 10 mg N=176
Olmesartan+Hydrochlorothiazide,if Needed+Amlodipine, if Needed-15.73-6.44-10.15-13.04-14.03-14.47

[back to top]

The Percentage of Participants Treated to Target Blood Pressure Goals Overall and for Each Treatment Step From Baseline to Completion of Treatment During Which the Goal Was Achieved.

For non-diabetic participants the target seated blood pressure goals were: Systolic - ≤130 mm Hg; Diastolic - ≤85 mm Hg. For diabetic participants the target seated blood pressure goals were: Systolic - <130 mm Hg; Diastolic - <80 mm Hg. (NCT00311155)
Timeframe: Baseline to ≤20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Overall N=691OLM 20 mg N=688OLM 20 mg+HCTZ 12.5 mg N=580OLM 20 mg+HCTZ 25 mg N=446OLM 20 mg+HCTZ 25 mg+AML 5 mg N=296OLM 20 mg+HCTZ 25 mg+AML 10 mg N=176
Olmesartan+Hydrochlorothiazide,if Needed+Amlodipine, if Needed71.812.316.419.214.98.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 4 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period.

Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. (NCT00403481)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall Study Population-18.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 6 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period.

Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. (NCT00403481)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall Study Population-18.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory BP (Diastolic)

Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. (NCT00403481)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall Study Population-11.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Systolic BP (SBP) as Measured by 24-hour ABPM.

Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. (NCT00403481)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall Study Population-20.4

[back to top]

Change in Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12 ) 24-hour Dosing Period.

Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. (NCT00403481)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 Weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall Study Population-10.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (Systolic).

Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. (NCT00403481)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
DaytimeNighttime
Overall Study Population-22.3-18.8

[back to top]

Change in Ambulatory BP (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12 During the Last (Week 12 ) 4 and 6 Hours of the Last 24-hour Dosing Period.

Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. (NCT00403481)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
4 hours6 hours
Overall Study Population-10.7-10.8

[back to top]

Change in Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure (Diastolic) From Baseline to Week 12

Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. (NCT00403481)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
DaytimeNighttime
Overall Study Population-12.0-10.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory BP Measurement (Systolic)During the Last 2 Hours of the Last (Week 12) 24-hour Dosing Period.

Participants had a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure session at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. This outcome measure pooled all participants regardless of their titration history during the study. (NCT00403481)
Timeframe: baseline and 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall Study Population-18.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.

All participants started the treatment arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). If their blood pressure was not controlled, participants were titrated at 3-week intervals to: Olm 40 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg This outcome measure included all participants at the end of the 12-week treatment period regardless of whether or not they were titrated. They had to have both baseline and 12-week ambulatory blood pressure measurements. (NCT00412932)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall Study-12.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment

All participants started the treatment arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). If their blood pressure was not controlled, participants were titrated at 3-week intervals to: Olm 40 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg This outcome measure included all participants at the end of the 12-week treatment period regardless of whether or not they were titrated. They had to have both baseline and 12-week ambulatory blood pressure measurements. (NCT00412932)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall Study-25.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am-4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10 Pm-6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitored Diastolic Blood Pressure After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment

All participants started the treatment arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). If their blood pressure was not controlled, participants were titrated at 3-week intervals to: Olm 40 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg This outcome measure included all participants at the end of the 12-week treatment period regardless of whether or not they were titrated. They had to have both baseline and 12-week ambulatory blood pressure measurements. (NCT00412932)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
DaytimeNighttime
Overall Study-13.0-11.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am-4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10pm-6am)Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment

All participants started the treatment arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). If their blood pressure was not controlled, participants were titrated at 3-week intervals to: Olm 40 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg This outcome measure included all participants at the end of the 12-week treatment period regardless of whether or not they were titrated. They had to have both baseline and 12-week ambulatory blood pressure measurements. (NCT00412932)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
DaytimeNighttime
Overall Study-26.5-24.4

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Achieved Mean 24-hour Ambluatory Blood Pressure of <140/90 mm Hg, Systolic Blood Pressure <140 mm Hg, and Diastolic Blood Pressure <90 mm Hg After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment

All participants started the treatment arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). If their blood pressure was not controlled, participants were titrated at 3-week intervals to: Olm 40 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg This outcome measure included all participants at the end of the 12-week treatment period regardless of whether or not they were titrated. They had to have both baseline and 12-week ambulatory blood pressure measurements. (NCT00412932)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BP<140/90 mm HgSBP<140 mm HgDBP<90 mm Hg
Overall Study133133149

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Achieved Mean Daytime (8am - 4pm) Ambulatory Blood Pressure of <140/90 mm Hg, Systolic Blood Pressure <140 mm Hg, and Diastolic Blood Pressure <90 mm Hg After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.

All participants started the treatment arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). If their blood pressure was not controlled, participants were titrated at 3-week intervals to: Olm 40 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg This outcome measure included all participants at the end of the 12-week treatment period regardless of whether or not they were titrated. They had to have both baseline and 12-week ambulatory blood pressure measurements. (NCT00412932)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BP<140/90 mm HgSBP<140 mm HgDBP<90 mm Hg
Overall Study120120145

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Achieved Mean Nighttime (10pm - 6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure of <140/90 mm Hg, Systolic Blood Pressure <140 mm Hg, and Diastolic Blood Pressure <90 mm Hg After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment.

All participants started the treatment arm with 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil (Olm). If their blood pressure was not controlled, participants were titrated at 3-week intervals to: Olm 40 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, then, if needed Olm 40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg This outcome measure included all participants at the end of the 12-week treatment period regardless of whether or not they were titrated. They had to have both baseline and 12-week ambulatory blood pressure measurements. (NCT00412932)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BP<140/90 mm HgSBP<140 mm HgDBP<90 mm Hg
Overall Study143143149

[back to top]

Change in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16.

Change = Week 16 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430508)
Timeframe: 8 weeks, change = week 16 - week 8

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM/HCTZ 40/25mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-7.2
OM/HCTZ 40/12.5mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-5.3
OM/HCTZ 20/12.5mg + 40/0 Matching Placebo-4.1
OM/HCTZ 40/0mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-2.0

[back to top]

Change in Mean Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16.

Change = Week 16 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430508)
Timeframe: 8 weeks, change = week 16 - week 8

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM/HCTZ 40/25mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-7.0
OM/HCTZ 40/12.5mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-5.5
OM/HCTZ 20/12.5mg + 40/0 Matching Placebo-4.0
OM/HCTZ 40/0mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-1.8

[back to top]

Change in Mean Night-time Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16.

Change = Week 16 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430508)
Timeframe: 8 weeks, change = week 16 - week 8

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM/HCTZ 40/25mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-7.9
OM/HCTZ 40/12.5mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-4.5
OM/HCTZ 20/12.5mg + 40/0 Matching Placebo-4.2
OM/HCTZ 40/0mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-2.3

[back to top]

Change in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 12.

Change = Week 12 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430508)
Timeframe: 4 weeks, change = week 12 - week 8

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM/HCTZ 40/25mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-8.74
OM/HCTZ 40/12.5mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-7.72
OM/HCTZ 20/12.5mg + 40/0 Matching Placebo-6.66
OM/HCTZ 40/0mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-4.47

[back to top]

Change in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16

Change = Week 16 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430508)
Timeframe: 8 weeks, change = week 16 - week 8

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM/HCTZ 40/25mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-11.16
OM/HCTZ 40/12.5mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-9.13
OM/HCTZ 20/12.5mg + 40/0 Matching Placebo-8.10
OM/HCTZ 40/0mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-5.66

[back to top]

Change in Mean Trough Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 12.

Change = Week 12 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430508)
Timeframe: 4 weeks, change = week 12 - week 8

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM/HCTZ 40/25mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-13.16
OM/HCTZ 40/12.5mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-10.90
OM/HCTZ 20/12.5mg + 40/0 Matching Placebo-9.65
OM/HCTZ 40/0mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-6.60

[back to top]

Change in Mean Trough Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 16.

Change = Week 16 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430508)
Timeframe: 8 weeks, change = week 16 - week 8

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM/HCTZ 40/25mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-16.17
OM/HCTZ 40/12.5mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-13.52
OM/HCTZ 20/12.5mg + 40/0 Matching Placebo-11.46
OM/HCTZ 40/0mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo-8.85

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Target Blood Pressure at Week 16

Target Blood Pressure is diastolic blood pressure (dBP) < 90 mmHg and systolic blood pressure (sBP) < 140 mmHg for non-diabetics, and dBP < 80 mmHg and sBP < 130 mmHg for diabetics (NCT00430508)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
OM/HCTZ 40/25mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo59
OM/HCTZ 40/12.5mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo110
OM/HCTZ 20/12.5mg + 40/0 Matching Placebo88
OM/HCTZ 40/0mg + 20/12.5 Matching Placebo68

[back to top]

The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Black Participants.

(NCT00430638)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Olmesartan vs. Placebo-21.3-12.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) After 12 Weeks of Randomized Treatment as Measured by Omron Device.

The change from baseline in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) after 12 weeks of randomized treatment was compared between the olmesartan based treatment group and the placebo treatment group. (NCT00430638)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.1
Olmesartan Group-22.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) After 12 Weeks of Randomized Treatment as Measured by Omron Device.

Change from study baseline (average of triplicate DBP measurements at the last 2 qualifying visits during placebo run-in period) in DBP to the end of 12 weeks of randomized treatment using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach. (NCT00430638)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Group-0.8
Olmesartan Group-12.1

[back to top]

The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Non-Black Participants.

(NCT00430638)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Olmesartan vs. Placebo-22.3-12.8

[back to top]

The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Females.

The difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in seated blood pressure for females in the olmesartan group vs. the placebo group was analyzed. (NCT00430638)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Olmesartan vs. Placebo-21.6-12.0

[back to top]

The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Males.

The difference in the change from baseline to week 12 in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure for males in the olmesartan group vs. the placebo group was analyzed. (NCT00430638)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood Pressure
Olmesartan vs. Placebo-22.6-13.5

[back to top]

The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Stage 2 Hypertensives

(NCT00430638)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 months

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Olmesartan vs. Placebo-22.5-13.2

[back to top]

The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Stage 1 Hypertensives

(NCT00430638)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Olmesartan vs. Placebo-22.1-12.2

[back to top]

The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Participants Less Than 65 Years Old.

(NCT00430638)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Olmesartan vs. Placebo-23.8-13.6

[back to top]

The Difference in the Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Between the Olmesartan Group and the Placebo Group for Participants Greater Than or Equal to 65 Years Old.

(NCT00430638)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Olmesartan vs. Placebo-16.1-9.0

[back to top]

Change in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure

"Change in mean trough sitting diastolic Blood Pressure between OM/HCTZ 20/25 mg vs. 40/25 mg, in those patients inadequately controlled on OM 40 mg monotherapy, after eight weeks of double blind treatment, as compared to baseline.~Change = Week 16 - Week 8 (baseline)." (NCT00430950)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg + 20/25 mg Matching Placebo-11.16
OM/HCTZ 20/25 mg + 40/25 mg Matching Placebo-10.45

[back to top]

Change in Mean Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 8(Baseline) to Week 12

Change = Week 12 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430950)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg + 20/25 mg Matching Placebo-9.32
OM/HCTZ 20/25 mg + 40/25 mg Matching Placebo-8.83

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Goal.

(NCT00430950)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg + 20/25 mg Matching Placebo260
OM/HCTZ 20/25 mg + 40/25 mg Matching Placebo255

[back to top]

Change in Daytime, Nighttime and 24-hour Blood Pressure Evaluated by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring 8 Weeks After Baseline.

Change = Week 16 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430950)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change from Week 8 to Wk 16 in mean 24-hr ABPM dBPChange from Week 8 to wk16 in daytime ABPM dBPChange from Week 8 to wk16 in nighttime ABPM dBPChange from Week 8 to wk16 in mean 24-hr ABPM sBPChange from Week 8 to wk16 in daytime ABPM sBPChange from Week 8 to wk16 in nighttime ABPM sBP
OM/HCTZ 20/25 mg + 40/25 mg Matching Placebo-7.6-7.7-7.0-12.0-12.3-10.7
OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg + 20/25 mg Matching Placebo-9.2-9.3-8.6-14.7-15.0-13.4

[back to top]

Change in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure 4 Weeks and 8 Weeks After Baseline.

4 weeks Change = Week 12 - Week 8 (baseline). 8 weeks Change = Week 16 - Week 8 (baseline). (NCT00430950)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change from baseline (Week 8) to Week 16 in sBPChange from baseline (Week 8) to Week 12 in sBP
OM/HCTZ 20/25 mg + 40/25 mg Matching Placebo-17.09-13.80
OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg + 20/25 mg Matching Placebo-17.41-14.07

[back to top]

Change in Sitting Pulse Pressure During the Core Phase of the Study

Pulse pressure is systolic pressure (SP) minus diastolic pressure (DP). The arm in which the highest sitting DPs were found at study entry was the arm used for all subsequent readings. A calibrated sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff were used to measure arterial sitting blood pressure (BP) at trough with the arm supported at the level of the heart. At each study visit, after having the patient in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes, SP and DP were measured 3 times at 1-2 minute intervals. A mean was calculated from the 3 measurements. A negative change indicates improvement. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 2 (Week 4) to end of Phase 2 (Week 8)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Amlodipine+Valsartan - Phase 21.26

[back to top]

Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) During the Extension Phase of the Study

The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic pressures were found at study entry was the arm used for all subsequent readings. A calibrated sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff were used to measure arterial sitting blood pressure (BP) at trough with the arm supported at the level of the heart. At each study visit, after having the patient in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes, systolic/diastolic blood pressure were measured 3 times at 1-2 minute intervals. A mean was calculated from the 3 measurements. A negative change indicates improvement. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 3 (Week 8) to end of Phase 3 (Week 12)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Amlodipine+Valsartan+HCTZ - Phase 3-10.84

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Normalized Blood Pressure During the Extension Phase of the Study

Normalized Blood Pressure was defined as a msSBP < 140 mmHg and/or a msDBP < 90 mmHg. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 3 (Week 8) to end of Phase 3 (Week 12)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
msSBP < 140 mmHgmsDBP < 90 mmHg
Amlodipine+Valsartan+HCTZ - Phase 359.383.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Normalized Blood Pressure During the Core Phase of the Study

Normalized Blood Pressure was defined as a msSBP < 140 mmHg and/or a msDBP < 90 mmHg. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 2 (Week 4) to end of Phase 2 (Week 8)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
msSBP < 140 mmHgmsDBP < 90 mmHg
Amlodipine+Valsartan - Phase 244.672.6

[back to top]

Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) During the Extension Phase of the Study

The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic pressures were found at study entry was the arm used for all subsequent readings. A calibrated sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff were used to measure arterial sitting blood pressure (BP) at trough with the arm supported at the level of the heart. At each study visit, after having the patient in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes, systolic/diastolic blood pressure were measured 3 times at 1-2 minute intervals. A mean was calculated from the 3 measurements. A negative change indicates improvement. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 3 (Week 8) to end of Phase 3 (Week 12)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Amlodipine+Valsartan+HCTZ - Phase 3-5.22

[back to top]

Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) During the Core Phase of the Study

The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic pressures were found at study entry was the arm used for all subsequent readings. A calibrated sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff were used to measure arterial sitting blood pressure (BP) at trough with the arm supported at the level of the heart. At each study visit, after having the patient in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes, systolic/diastolic blood pressure were measured 3 times at 1-2 minute intervals. A mean was calculated from the 3 measurements. A negative change indicates improvement. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 2 (Week 4) to end of Phase 2 (Week 8)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Amlodipine+Valsartan - Phase 2-9.13

[back to top]

Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) During the Core Phase of the Study

The arm in which the highest sitting diastolic pressures were found at study entry was the arm used for all subsequent readings. A calibrated sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff were used to measure arterial sitting blood pressure (BP) at trough with the arm supported at the level of the heart. At each study visit, after having the patient in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes, systolic/diastolic blood pressure were measured 3 times at 1-2 minute intervals. A mean was calculated from the 3 measurements. A negative change indicates improvement. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 2 (Week 4) to end of Phase 2 (Week 8)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Amlodipine+Valsartan - Phase 2-7.87

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Protocol-defined Blood Pressure Response During the Extension Phase of the Study

Blood pressure response was defined as msSBP < 140 mmHg or a 20 mmHg decrease in msSBP at the end of Phase 3 compared to Baseline in Phase 3 or a msDBP < 90 mmHg or a 10 mmHg decrease in msDBP at the end of Phase 3 compared to Baseline in Phase 3. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline of Phase 3 (Week 8) to end of Phase 3 (Week 12)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
msSBP responsemsDBP response
Amlodipine+Valsartan+HCTZ - Phase 361.583.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Achieved a Protocol-defined Blood Pressure Response During the Core Phase of the Study

Blood pressure response was defined as msSBP < 140 mmHg or a 20 mmHg decrease in msSBP at the end of Phase 2 (Week 8) compared to Baseline in Phase 2 (week 4) or a msDBP < 90 mmHg or a 10 mmHg decrease in msDBP at the end of Phase 2 compared to Baseline in Phase 2. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline of Phase 2 (Week 4) to end of Phase 2 (Week 8)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
msSBP responsemsDBP response
Amlodipine+Valsartan - Phase 247.473.1

[back to top]

Change in Sitting Pulse Rate During the Extension Phase of the Study

Pulse rate was measured once for 30 seconds just prior to blood pressure measurements in the sitting position. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 3 (Week 8) to end of Phase 3 (week 12)

InterventionBPM (beats per minute) (Mean)
Amlodipine+Valsartan+HCTZ - Phase 30.09

[back to top]

Change in Sitting Pulse Rate During the Core Phase of the Study

Pulse rate was measured once for 30 seconds just prior to blood pressure measurements in the sitting position. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 2 (Week 4) to end of Phase 2 (Week 8)

InterventionBPM (beats per minute) (Mean)
Amlodipine+Valsartan - Phase 2-1.93

[back to top]

Change in Sitting Pulse Pressure During the Extension Phase of the Study

Pulse pressure is systolic pressure (SP) minus diastolic pressure (DP). The arm in which the highest sitting DPs were found at study entry was the arm used for all subsequent readings. A calibrated sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff were used to measure arterial sitting blood pressure (BP) at trough with the arm supported at the level of the heart. At each study visit, after having the patient in a sitting position for at least 5 minutes, SP and DP were measured 3 times at 1-2 minute intervals. A mean was calculated from the 3 measurements. A negative change indicates improvement. (NCT00523744)
Timeframe: Baseline Phase 3 (Week 8) to end of Phase 3 (Week 12)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Amlodipine+Valsartan+HCTZ - Phase 3-5.62

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure for the Amlodipine 5mg + Olmesartan 40 mg Group

Change from study baseline in cuff systolic pressure (as measured by an Omron device) to the end of the treatment period. The Last Observation Carried Forwarded (LOCF) approach was used for the analysis. (NCT00527514)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of week 9

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Group 3 - Aml 5 mg + Olm 40 mg-20.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure for the Amlodipine 5mg Group.

Change from study baseline in cuff systolic pressure (as measured by an Omron device) to the end of the treatment period. The Last Observation Carried Forwarded (LOCF) approach was used for the analysis. (NCT00527514)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of week 3

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Group 1 Amlodipine 5 mg-10.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daytime and Nighttime Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure

(NCT00527514)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
DaytimeNighttime
Overall Active Treatment Period-23.1-18.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Monitoring

(NCT00527514)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 Weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Overall Active Treatment Period-21.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure for the Amlodipine 10 mg + Olmesartan 40 mg Group

Change from study baseline in cuff systolic pressure (as measured by an Omron device) to the end of the treatment period. The Last Observation Carried Forwarded (LOCF) approach was used for the analysis. (NCT00527514)
Timeframe: Baseline to end end of week 12

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Group 4 - Aml 10 mg + Olm 40 mg-24.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Cuff Systolic Blood Pressure for the Amlodipine 5mg + Olmesartan 20 mg Group.

Change from study baseline in cuff systolic pressure (as measured by an Omron device) to the end of the treatment period. The Last Observation Carried Forwarded (LOCF) approach was used for the analysis. (NCT00527514)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of week 6

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Group 2 - Aml 5 mg + Olmesartan 20 mg-18.0

[back to top]

Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12

(NCT00649389)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 12

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM40/AML10-31.1
OM40/HCTZ25-31.2
AML10/HCTZ25-28.9
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25-38.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Reached Blood Pressure Goal (<140/90 mmHg; <130/80 mmHg for Subjects With Diabetes, Chronic Renal Disease, or Chronic Cardiovascular Disease)by 12 Weeks

(NCT00649389)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
OM40/AML1046.0
OM40/HCTZ2546.6
AML10/HCTZ2534.9
OM40/AML10/HCTZ2564.3

[back to top]

Change in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 12 or Early Termination

(NCT00649389)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks or early termination

,,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Diastolic blood pressureSystolic blood pressure
AML10/HCTZ25-10.7-18.5
OM40/AML10-13.9-23.5
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25-18.0-30.3
OM40/HCTZ25-14.5-23.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP).

(NCT00649389)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OM40/AML10-17.8
OM40/HCTZ25-16.5
AML10/HCTZ25-14.8
OM40/AML10/HCTZ25-21.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Nighttime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean nighttime ambulatory blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, BP<120/70, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75, DBP<70 at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean nighttime BP < 135/85mean nighttime BP < 130/80mean nighttime BP < 125/75mean nighttime BP < 120/80mean nighttime BP < 120/70mean nighttime SBP < 135mean nighttime SBP < 130mean nighttime SBP < 125mean nighttime SBP < 120mean nighttime DBP < 85mean nighttime DBP < 80mean nighttime DBP < 75mean nighttime DBP < 70
Aml + Olm + Hctz152137119112101154139123112160158147124

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 2 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean last 2 hour ambulatory blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean last 2 hour BP < 135/85mean last 2 hour BP < 130/80mean last 2 hour BP < 125/75mean last 2 hour BP < 120/80mean last 2 hour SBP < 135mean last 2 hour SBP < 130mean last 2 hour SBP < 125mean last 2 hour SBP < 120mean last 2 hour DBP < 85mean last 2 hour DBP < 80mean last 2 hour DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz11085634911592765114512594

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Nighttime Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean nighttime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean nighttime SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean nighttime SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean nighttime SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean nighttime SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean nighttime DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean nighttime SBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean nighttime SBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean nighttime DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz607921580412123

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 3

number of participants achieving seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 3 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 3

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean BP < 135/85mean BP < 130/80mean BP < 125/75mean BP < 120/80mean SBP < 135mean SBP < 130mean SBP < 125mean SBP < 120mean DBP < 85mean DBP < 80mean DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz311042411792995829

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean seated SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz4873451185422723

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 6

number of participants achieving seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 6 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean BP < 135/85mean BP < 130/80mean BP < 125/75mean BP < 120/80mean SBP < 135mean SBP < 130mean SBP < 125mean SBP < 120mean DBP < 85mean DBP < 80mean DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz61361813734831141279148

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 15

number of participants achieving mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 15 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 15

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean seated SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz3166552052453243

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean daytime BP < 135/85mean daytime BP < 130/80mean daytime BP < 125/75mean daytime BP < 120/80mean daytime SBP < 135mean daytime SBP < 130mean daytime SBP < 125mean daytime SBP < 120mean daytime DBP < 85mean daytime DBP < 80mean daytime DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz11683484211894674215112491

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Daytime Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean daytime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean daytime SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean daytime SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean daytime SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean daytime SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean daytime DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean daytime DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean daytime DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean daytime DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz478431368413323

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean 24 Hour Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean 24 hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean 24-hour SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean 24-hour SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean 24-hour SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean 24-hour SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean 24-hour DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean 24-hour DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean 24-hour DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean 24-hour DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz509122272473115

[back to top]

Change in Mean Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SeSBP) From Week 0 (Baseline) After 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 Weeks

change in mean SeSBP from week 0 (baseline) to Weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18. (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
week 3 mean SBP change from baselineweek 6 mean SBP change from baselineweek 9 mean SBP change from baselineweek 12 mean SBP change from baselineweek 15 mean SBP change from baselineweek 18 mean SBP change from baseline
Aml + Olm + Hctz-10.3-17.9-20.0-23.7-28.5-31.1

[back to top]

Change in Mean Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP) From Week 0 (Baseline) After 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 Weeks

change in mean SeDBP from week 0 (baseline) to Weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18. (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
week 3 mean seDBP change from baselineweek 6 mean seDBP change from baselineweek 9 mean seDBP change from baselineweek 12 mean seDBP change from baselineweek 15 mean seDBP change from baselineweek 18 mean seDBP change from baseline
Aml + Olm + Hctz-4.1-8.2-9.7-11.2-14.4-15.1

[back to top]

Change From Week 0 (Baseline) in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment

Change from week 0 (baseline) in mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) after 12 weeks of active treatment. change = week 12 - week 0. (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Aml + Olm + Hctz-19.9

[back to top]

Change From Week 0 (Baseline) in Mean ABPM Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment

24-hour mean DBP, Daytime mean DBP, Nighttime mean DBP, Last 6 hour mean DBP, Last 4 hour mean DBP, Last 2 hour mean DBP (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12 (24-hour, Daytime, Nighttime, Last 6 hour, Last 4 hour, Last 2 hour)

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
24-hour mean DBP change from baselinedaytime mean DBP change from baselinenighttime mean DBP change from baselinelast 6 hour mean DBP change from baselinelast 4 hour mean DBP change from baselinelast 2 hour mean DBP change from baseline
Aml + Olm + Hctz-11.2-11.7-10.4-10.9-11.1-11.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 18

number of participants achieving mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 18 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 18

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean seated SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz2253642550332952

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 3

number of participants achieving mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 3 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 3

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean seated SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz131626216325103

[back to top]

Change From Week 0 (Baseline) in Mean ABPM SBP After 12 Weeks of Active Treatment

Daytime mean SBP, Nighttime mean SBP, Last 6 hour mean SBP, Last 4 hour mean SBP, Last 2 hour mean SBP (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12 (24-hour, Daytime, Nighttime, Last 6 hour, Last 4 hour, Last 2 hour)

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
daytime mean SBP change from baselinenighttime mean SBP change from baselinelast 6 hours mean SBP change from baselinelast 4 hours mean SBP change from baselinelast 2 hours mean SBP change from baseline
Aml + Olm + Hctz-20.8-18.5-18.9-19.1-19.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 9

number of participants achieving mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 9 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 9

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean seated SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz7269349100431823

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12

number of participants achieving seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean BP < 135/85mean BP < 130/80mean BP < 125/75mean BP < 120/80mean SBP < 135mean SBP < 130mean SBP < 125mean SBP < 120mean DBP < 85mean DBP < 80mean DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz866133289370462813410574

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 18

number of participants achieving seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 18 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 18

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean BP < 135/85mean BP < 130/80mean BP < 125/75mean BP < 120/80mean SBP < 135mean SBP < 130mean SBP < 125mean SBP < 120mean DBP < 85mean DBP < 80mean DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz117875649123101745114712894

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 6

number of participants achieving mean seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 6 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 6

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean seated SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean seated SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean seated DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz6990312120332415

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 9

number of participants achieving seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 9 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 9

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean BP < 135/85mean BP < 130/80mean BP < 125/75mean BP < 120/80mean SBP < 135mean SBP < 130mean SBP < 125mean SBP < 120mean DBP < 85mean DBP < 80mean DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz76472519826141201329564

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean 24-hour BP <135/85mean 24-hour BP <130/80mean 24-hour BP <125/75mean 24-hour BP <120/80mean 24-hour SBP <135mean 24-hour SBP <130mean 24-hour SBP <125mean 24-hour SBP <120mean 24-hour DBP <85mean 24-hour DBP <80mean 24-hour DBP <75
Aml + Olm + Hctz14011676591401209259158146121

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Seated Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 15

number of participants achieving seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 15 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 15

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean BP < 135/85mean BP < 130/80mean BP < 125/75mean BP < 120/80mean SBP < 135mean SBP < 130mean SBP < 125mean SBP < 120mean DBP < 85mean DBP < 80mean DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz11483514511695694815312296

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 2 Hour Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean last 2 hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean last 2 hour SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean last 2 hour SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean last 2 hour SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean last 2 hour SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean last 2 hour DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean last 2 hour DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean last 2 hour DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean last 2 hour DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz636235577282931

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 4 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean last 4 hour ambulatory blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean last 4 hour BP < 135/85mean last 4 hour BP < 130/80mean last 4 hour BP < 125/75mean last 4 hour BP < 120/80mean last 4 hour SBP < 135mean last 4 hour SBP < 130mean last 4 hour SBP < 125mean last 4 hour SBP < 120mean last 4 hour DBP < 85mean last 4 hour DBP < 80mean last 4 hour DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz129107927213111410272150137120

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 4 Hour Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions

number of participants achieving mean last 4 hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean last 4 hour SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean last 4 hour SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean last 4 hour SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean last 4 hour SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean last 4 hour DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean last 4 hour DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean last 4 hour DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean last 4 hour DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz676528576362528

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 6 Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Thresholds at Week 12

number participants achieving mean last 6 hour ambulatory blood pressure thresholds BP<135/85, BP<130/80, BP<125/75, BP<120/80, SBP<135, SBP<130, SBP<125, SBP<120, DBP<85, DBP<80, DBP<75 at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean last 6 hour BP < 135/85mean last 6 hour BP < 130/80mean last 6 hour BP < 125/75mean last 6 hour BP < 120/80mean last 6 hour SBP < 135mean last 6 hour SBP < 130mean last 6 hour SBP < 125mean last 6 hour SBP < 120mean last 6 hour DBP < 85mean last 6 hour DBP < 80mean last 6 hour DBP < 75
Aml + Olm + Hctz1351241018514312710885157146130

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving Mean Last 6 Hour Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Reductions at Week 12

number of participants achieving mean last 6 hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions of; SBP reduction <= 15 mmHg, SBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 30 mmHg, SBP reduction > 30 mmHg & <= 45 mmHg, SBP reduction > 45 mmHg, DBP reduction <= 10 mmHg, DBP reduction > 10 mmHg & <= 15 mmHg, DBP reduction > 15 mmHg & <= 20 mmHg, DBP reduction > 20 mmHg at week 12 (NCT00654745)
Timeframe: week 0 - week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
mean last 6 hour SBP reduction =<15 mm Hgmean last 6 hour SBP reduction >15 & =<30 mm Hgmean last 6 hour SBP reduction >30 & =<45 mm Hgmean last 6 hour SBP reduction >45 mm Hgmean last 6 hour DBP reduction =<10 mm Hgmean last 6 hour DBP reduction >10 & =<15 mm Hgmean last 6 hour DBP reduction >15 & =<20 mm Hgmean last 6 hour DBP reduction >20 mm Hg
Aml + Olm + Hctz617623576412721

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in daytime (6am to 10pm) mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Daytime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 6 am and 10 pm. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-7.71
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-8.43
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-8.87
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-7.82
Placebo QD-0.59

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure

The change in mean trough clinic sitting diastolic blood pressure measured at final visit or week 6 relative to baseline. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-6.82
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-6.86
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-8.42
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-6.91
Placebo QD0.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure

The change in mean trough clinic sitting systolic blood pressure measured at final visit or week 6 relative to baseline. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-14.28
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-14.47
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-17.58
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-14.87
Placebo QD-2.06

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

The change in the 12-hour mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 12-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded in the first 12 hours after dosing. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-7.72
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-8.63
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-8.88
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-7.86
Placebo QD-0.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-12.15
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-13.48
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-14.62
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-12.56
Placebo QD-1.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in nighttime (12am to 6am) mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Nighttime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 12 am and 6 am. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-11.10
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-12.39
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-13.35
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-12.13
Placebo QD-0.97

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in trough mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The trough mean is the average of all measurements recorded from 22 to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-7.96
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-7.93
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-8.68
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-7.56
Placebo QD-1.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in trough mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The trough mean is the average of all measurements recorded from 22 to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-12.15
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-12.39
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-13.42
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-11.10
Placebo QD-1.21

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as < 90 mm Hg and/or Reduction From Baseline ≥ 10 mm Hg

Percentage of participants who achieve a clinic diastolic blood pressure response measured at week 6, defined as less than 90 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg. Diastolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 trough sitting diastolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD67.5
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD71.0
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD73.5
Olmesartan 40 mg QD73.9
Placebo QD47.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as < 140 mm Hg and/or Reduction From Baseline ≥ 20 mm Hg

Percentage of participants who achieve a clinic systolic blood pressure response measured at week 6, defined as less than 140 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD47.8
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD50.4
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD56.6
Olmesartan 40 mg QD53.2
Placebo QD17.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in daytime (6am to 10pm) mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Daytime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 6 am and 10 pm. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-12.57
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-13.75
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-14.96
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-12.73
Placebo QD-1.54

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Both a Clinic Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure Response

Percentage of participants who achieve both a clinic diastolic and systolic blood pressure response measured at week 6, defined as less than 90 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg AND less than 140 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg. Diastolic and systolic blood pressure is based on the arithmetic mean of the 3 sitting blood pressure measurements. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD42.7
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD45.3
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD52.0
Olmesartan 40 mg QD47.5
Placebo QD14.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

The change in the 12-hour mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 12-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded in the first 12 hours after dosing. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-12.72
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-14.05
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-15.18
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-13.07
Placebo QD-1.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in nighttime (12am to 6am) mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Nighttime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 12 am and 6 am. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-6.98
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-7.90
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-7.79
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-7.62
Placebo QD-0.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in 24-hour mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 6 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing. (NCT00696241)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 6.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20 mg QD-7.47
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD-8.38
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD-8.61
Olmesartan 40 mg QD-7.74
Placebo QD-0.69

[back to top]

Change in Mean Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
4 weeks, N=9758 weeks, N=92912 weeks, N=86516 weeks, N=79720 weeks, N=745
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide-14.6-16.6-21.8-26.0-26.8

[back to top]

Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140/90 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: <135/80 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: <130/80 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: <120/80 mm Hg, N=2308 weeks: <140/90 mm Hg, N=2318 weeks: <135/80 mm Hg, N=2318 weeks: <130/80 mm Hg, N=2328 weeks: <120/80 mm Hg, N=23212 weeks: <140/90mm Hg, N=23212 weeks: <135/80 mm Hg, N=23212 weeks: <130/80 mm Hg, N=23212 weeks: <120/80 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <140/90 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <135/80 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <130/80 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <120/80 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <140/90 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <135/80 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <130/80 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <120/80 mm Hg, N=232
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide45.714.810.43.955.023.820.810.468.538.435.816.480.649.147.430.686.657.855.239.7

[back to top]

Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=2308 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=2318 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=2318 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=23112 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=23212 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=23212 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=232
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide60.942.219.671.953.730.382.366.045.392.276.355.294.880.661.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean Nighttime Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 20 Weeks

Once the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) has been applied, the dose of medication was taken and the subject wore the ABPM for a period of 24 hours. Nighttime is defined as 10 p.m. - 6 a.m. (NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Nighttime mean systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgNighttime mean systolic blood pressure <135 mmHgNighttime mean systolic blood pressure <130 mmHgNighttime mean systolic blood pressure <120 mmHgNighttime mean diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgNighttime mean diastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgNighttime mean diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <140/90 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <135/95 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <135/80 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <130/80 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <125/75 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <120/80 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <120/70 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide99.599.597.586.499.598.596.099.098.596.095.088.985.978.9

[back to top]

Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=2308 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=2318 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=2318 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=2318 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=23112 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=23212 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=23212 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=23212 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=23216 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=23220 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=232
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide51.734.419.65.762.344.633.813.076.359.147.019.884.971.161.234.191.080.671.144.4

[back to top]

Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=2308 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=2208 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=2208 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=2208 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=22012 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=20812 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=20812 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=20812 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=20816 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=19916 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=19916 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=19916 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=19920 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=18920 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=18920 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=18920 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=189
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide60.032.27.40.453.638.27.30.938.941.816.42.930.737.225.17.024.337.629.68.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Asain Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=1284 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=1284 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=1288 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=1288 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=1288 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=12812 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=12812 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=12812 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=12816 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=12816 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=12816 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=12820 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=12820 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=12820 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=128
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide83.669.545.389.179.760.295.387.571.196.993.082.096.993.085.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Asian Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=1264 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=1264 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=1264 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=1268 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=1238 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=1238 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=1238 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=12312 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=12012 weeks: >10 and ≤15 mm Hg, N=12012 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=12012 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=12016 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=11216 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=11216 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=11216 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=11220 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=10520 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=10520 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=10520 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=105
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide47.626.213.512.738.224.422.015.533.325.819.221.727.717.020.534.836.216.218.129.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Asian Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=1284 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=1284 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=1284 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=1288 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=1288 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=1288 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=1288 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=12812 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=12812 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=12812 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=12812 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=12816 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=12816 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=12816 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=12816 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=12820 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=12820 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=12820 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=12820 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=128
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide64.851.635.211.776.667.251.625.089.178.966.438.395.389.881.347.797.793.085.951.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Asian Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=1264 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=1264 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=1264 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=1268 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=1238 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=1238 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=1238 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=12312 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=12012 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=12012 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=12012 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=12016 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=11216 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=11216 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=11216 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=11220 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=10520 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=10520 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=10520 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=105
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide43.738.115.92.440.735.822.01.628.339.227.55.020.536.631.311.629.528.633.38.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Elderly Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=2274 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=2274 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=2278 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=2278 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=2278 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=22712 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=22712 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=22712 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=22716 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=22716 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=22716 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=22720 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=22720 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=22720 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=227
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide88.176.758.292.183.771.897.492.180.298.794.388.698.795.290.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Elderly Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=2244 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=2244 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=2244 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=2248 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=2178 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=2178 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=2178 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=21712 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=19912 weeks: >10 and ≤15 mm Hg, N=19912 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=19912 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=19916 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=17916 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=17916 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=17916 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=17920 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=16620 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=16620 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=16620 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=166
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide63.820.59.46.357.119.814.38.845.225.115.614.127.425.122.924.634.920.524.120.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Elderly Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=2274 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=2274 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=2274 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=2278 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=2278 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=2278 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=2278 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=22712 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=22712 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=22712 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=22712 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=22716 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=22716 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=22716 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=22716 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=22720 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=22720 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=22720 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=22720 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=227
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide52.037.923.49.767.057.743.618.180.670.056.828.687.779.770.943.691.685.978.950.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Elderly Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=2244 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=2244 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=2244 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=2248 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=2178 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=2178 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=2178 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=21712 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=19912 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=19912 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=19912 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=19916 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=17916 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=17916 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=17916 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=17920 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=16620 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=16620 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=16620 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=166
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide47.340.211.21.342.937.816.62.826.646.724.62.017.932.439.710.114.537.438.010.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Hispanic Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=988 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=1008 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=1008 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=10012 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=10012 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=10012 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=10016 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=10016 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=10016 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=10020 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=10020 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=10020 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=100
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide66.353.134.785.070.048.092.078.062.096.090.075.096.090.075.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Hispanic Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=988 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=918 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=918 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=918 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=9112 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=8312 weeks: >10 and ≤15 mm Hg, N=8312 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=8312 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=8316 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=7516 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=7516 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=7516 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=7520 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=7120 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=7120 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=7120 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=71
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide65.316.38.210.252.818.714.314.341.020.514.524.130.725.316.028.031.012.726.829.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Hispanic Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=988 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=1008 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=1008 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=1008 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=10012 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=10012 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=10012 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=10012 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=10016 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=10016 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=10016 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=10016 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=10020 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=10020 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=10020 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=10020 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=100
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide55.139.831.610.264.051.041.015.077.067.054.030.084.077.066.037.088.083.072.041.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Hispanic Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=984 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=988 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=918 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=918 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=918 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=9112 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=8312 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=8312 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=8312 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=8316 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=7516 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=7516 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=7516 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=7520 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=7120 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=7120 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=7120 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=71
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide50.037.87.15.142.944.09.93.331.336.125.37.222.736.034.76.723.933.833.88.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Obese Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=4974 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=4974 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=4978 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=4978 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=5008 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=50012 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=50012 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=50012 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=50016 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=50016 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=50016 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=50020 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=50020 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=50020 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=500
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide63.246.326.077.259.438.886.669.848.493.280.460.494.683.867.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Obese Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=4954 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=4954 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=4954 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=4958 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=4688 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=4688 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=4688 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=46812 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=43612 weeks: >10 and ≤15 mm Hg, N=43612 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=43612 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=43616 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=40016 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=40016 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=40016 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=40020 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=37920 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=37920 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=37920 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=379
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide67.517.88.56.359.419.913.07.748.922.516.112.633.323.019.024.831.918.722.426.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Obese Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=4974 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=4974 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=4974 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=4978 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=5008 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=5008 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=5008 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=50012 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=50012 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=50012 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=50012 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=50016 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=50016 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=50016 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=50016 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=50020 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=50020 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=50020 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=50020 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=500
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide51.337.223.37.963.249.237.013.876.661.649.223.285.875.663.634.690.282.672.243.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Obese Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=4954 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=4954 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=4954 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=4958 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=4688 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=4688 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=4688 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=46812 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=43612 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=43612 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=43612 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=43616 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=40016 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=40016 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=40016 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=40020 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=37920 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=37920 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=37920 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=379
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide56.035.28.50.452.435.910.31.537.842.417.42.527.836.027.58.820.637.533.38.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean 24-hour Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 12 Weeks

Once the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) has been applied, the dose of medication was taken and the subject wore the ABPM for a period of 24 hours. (NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
24-hour mean systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg24-hour mean systolic blood pressure <135 mmHg24-hour mean systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg24-hour mean systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg24-hour mean diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg24-hour mean diastolic blood pressure <85 mmHg24-hour mean diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <140/90 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <135/95 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <135/80 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <130/80 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <125/75 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <120/80 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <120/70 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide95.690.479.947.298.796.184.794.389.180.373.452.445.927.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean 24-hour Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 20 Weeks

Once the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) has been applied, the dose of medication was taken and the subject wore the ABPM for a period of 24 hours. (NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
24-hour mean systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg24-hour mean systolic blood pressure <135 mmHg24-hour mean systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg24-hour mean systolic blood pressure <120 mmHg24-hour mean diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg24-hour mean diastolic blood pressure <85 mmHg24-hour mean diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <140/90 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <135/95 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <135/80 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <130/80 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <125/75 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <120/80 mmHg24-hour mean blood pressure <120/70 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide99.597.594.570.4100.097.593.099.596.092.590.575.470.455.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean Daytime Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 12 Weeks

Once the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) has been applied, the dose of medication was taken and the subject wore the ABPM for a period of 24 hours. Daytime is defined as 8AM - 4PM. (NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daytime mean systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgDaytime mean systolic blood pressure <135 mmHgDaytime mean systolic blood pressure <130 mmHgDaytime mean systolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDaytime mean diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDaytime mean diastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDaytime mean diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <140/90 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <135/95 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <135/80 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <130/80 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <125/75 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <120/80 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <120/70 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide88.279.966.428.895.683.065.586.972.961.153.331.927.913.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean Daytime Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 20 Weeks

Once the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) has been applied, the dose of medication was taken and the subject wore the ABPM for a period of 24 hours. Daytime is defined as 8AM - 4PM. (NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Daytime mean systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgDaytime mean systolic blood pressure <135 mmHgDaytime mean systolic blood pressure <130 mmHgDaytime mean systolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDaytime mean diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDaytime mean diastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDaytime mean diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <140/90 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <135/95 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <135/80 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <130/80 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <125/75 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <120/80 mmHgDaytime mean blood pressure <120/70 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide96.593.583.951.898.592.583.995.088.481.977.456.851.333.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving the Mean Nighttime Blood Pressure Goals, as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor, From Baseline to 12 Weeks

Once the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) has been applied, the dose of medication was taken and the subject wore the ABPM for a period of 24 hours. Nighttime is defined as 10p.m. - 6 a.m. (NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Nighttime mean systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgNighttime mean systolic blood pressure <135 mmHgNighttime mean systolic blood pressure <130 mmHgNighttime mean systolic blood pressure <120 mmHgNighttime mean diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgNighttime mean diastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgNighttime mean diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <140/90 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <135/95 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <135/80 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <130/80 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <125/75 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <120/80 mmHgNighttime mean blood pressure <120/70 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide97.894.392.674.799.698.394.897.493.490.889.177.774.262.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on a Beta Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide88.575.262.033.694.783.261.186.755.849.629.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on a Beta Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide93.887.679.747.898.289.477.092.974.369.943.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on a Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide73.559.047.918.886.372.748.768.440.234.216.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on a Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide89.783.869.241.091.585.569.285.564.159.836.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on a Diuretic Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide92.882.578.351.294.686.871.788.667.565.148.2

[back to top]

The Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve BP Goal (<140/90 mmHg for Non-diabetics or <130/80 mmHg for Diabetics) From Baseline to 12 and 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 and 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
12 weeks20 weeks
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide71.384.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=1904 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=1904 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=1904 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=1908 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=1908 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=1908 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=1908 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=19012 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=19012 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=19012 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=19012 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=19016 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=19016 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=19016 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=19016 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=19020 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=19020 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=19020 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=19020 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=190
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide54.741.126.310.069.056.342.615.881.669.557.930.087.979.069.039.591.184.275.348.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=1894 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=1894 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=1894 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=1898 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=1818 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=1818 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=1818 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=18112 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=17012 weeks: >10 and ≤15 mm Hg, N=17012 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=17012 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=17016 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=15616 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=15616 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=15616 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=15620 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=15020 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=15020 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=15020 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=150
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide67.716.911.63.760.820.414.93.941.232.412.913.532.726.921.818.637.318.026.018.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=1904 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=1904 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=1908 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=1908 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=1908 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=19012 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=19012 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=19012 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=19016 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=19016 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=19016 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=19020 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=19020 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=19020 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=190
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide75.864.239.085.872.651.194.283.263.797.989.070.599.090.576.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=4534 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=4534 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=4534 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=4538 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=4318 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=4318 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=4318 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=43112 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=40212 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=40212 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=40212 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=40216 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=37116 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=37116 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=37116 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=37120 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=35620 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=35620 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=35620 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=356
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide49.538.411.50.748.035.514.42.130.443.822.63.224.037.729.19.219.736.536.07.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=4544 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=4544 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=4544 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=4548 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=4578 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=4578 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=4578 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=45712 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=45712 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=45712 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=45712 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=45716 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=45716 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=45716 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=45716 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=45720 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=45720 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=45720 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=45720 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=457
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide56.441.427.17.967.654.340.916.281.467.254.127.688.880.367.039.091.585.674.847.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=4534 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=4534 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=4534 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=4538 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=4318 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=4318 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=4318 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=43112 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=40212 weeks: >10 and ≤15 mm Hg, N=40212 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=40212 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=40216 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=37116 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=37116 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=37116 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=37120 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=35620 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=35620 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=35620 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=356
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide62.722.38.66.456.619.715.38.444.322.117.416.232.424.021.022.633.219.422.525.0

[back to top]

Percentage of African American/Black Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=2304 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=2308 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=2208 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=2208 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=2208 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=22012 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=20812 weeks: >10 and ≤15 mm Hg, N=20812 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=20812 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=20816 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=19916 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=19916 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=19916 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=19920 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=18920 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=18920 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=18920 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=189
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide70.017.87.94.466.815.010.97.354.821.212.012.038.719.623.118.636.019.620.623.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on a Diuretic Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide92.882.578.351.294.686.871.788.667.565.148.2

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Who Achieve Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal (<140 mm Hg for Non-diabetics and <130 mm Hg for Diabetics) From Baseline to 12 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide75.8

[back to top]

The Percentage of Subjects Achieving Seated Diastolic BP Goal (<90 mmHg for Non-diabetics or < 80 mmHg for Subjects With Diabetes) From Baseline to 12 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide84.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Values

Once the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) has been applied, the dose of medication was taken and the subject wore the ABPM for a period of 24 hours. Daytime is defined as 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Nighttime is defined as 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. (NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
24-hour mean systolic blood pressureMean daytime systolic blood pressureMean nighttime systolic blood pressureSystolic blood pressure - last 2 hours of doseSystolic blood pressure - last 4 hours of doseSystolic blood pressure - last 6 hours of dose24-hour mean diastolic blood pressureMean daytime diastolic blood pressureMean nighttime diastolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure - last 2 hours of doseDiastolic blood pressure - last 4 hours of doseDiastolic blood pressure - last 6 hours of dose
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide-14.8-16.3-12.5-13.6-13.0-12.6-9.4-10.6-7.6-8.6-8.0-7.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 20 in Ambulatory Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Values

Once the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) has been applied, the dose of medication was taken and the subject wore the ABPM for a period of 24 hours. Daytime is defined as 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Nighttime is defined as 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. (NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
24-hour mean systolic blood pressureMean daytime systolic blood pressureMean nighttime systolic blood pressureSystolic blood pressure - last 2 hours of doseSystolic blood pressure - last 4 hours of doseSystolic blood pressure - last 6 hours of dose24-hour mean diastolic blood pressureMean daytime diastolic blood pressureMean nighttime diastolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure - last 2 hours of doseDiastolic blood pressure - last 4 hours of doseDiastolic blood pressure - last 6 hours of dose
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide-21.0-23.2-17.5-19.6-18.2-17.9-13.3-15.0-11.1-12.3-11.6-11.3

[back to top]

Change in Mean Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
4 weeks, N=9758 weeks, N=92912 weeks, N=86516 weeks, N=79720 weeks, N=745
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide-8.1-9.1-11.9-14.6-14.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Metabolic Syndrome Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=4544 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=4544 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=4548 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=4578 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=4578 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=45712 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=45712 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=45712 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=45716 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=45716 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=45716 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=45720 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=45720 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=45720 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=457
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide69.653.531.982.166.143.590.476.656.594.883.265.995.486.272.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=9758 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=92912 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=86516 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=79720 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=745
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide51.436.610.51.545.837.714.32.330.543.122.43.923.235.932.08.920.436.234.09.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=9758 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=92912 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=86516 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=79720 weeks: <140 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: <135 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: <130 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: <120 mm Hg, N=745
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide54.239.825.38.957.245.935.012.972.659.045.319.480.970.358.930.984.375.264.231.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=9758 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=92912 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=86516 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=79720 weeks: ≤ 10 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: >10 and ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: >15 and ≤ 20 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: >20 mm Hg, N=745
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide61.321.010.57.254.720.714.110.643.824.115.816.330.422.821.525.431.419.922.626.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
4 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=9754weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=9758 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=92912 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=86516 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=79720 weeks: <90 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: <85 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: <80 mm Hg, N=745
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide71.355.234.275.157.140.284.368.749.590.276.959.689.779.562.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Achieving Seated Blood Pressure Goal From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: <140/90 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: <135/80 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: <130/80 mm Hg, N=9754 weeks: <120/80 mm Hg, N=9758 weeks: <140/90 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: <135/80 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: <130/80 mm Hg, N=9298 weeks: <120/80 mm Hg, N=92912 weeks: <140/90 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: <135/80 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: <130/80 mm Hg, N=86512 weeks: <120/80 mm Hg, N=86516 weeks: <140/90mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: <135/80mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: <130/80mm Hg, N=79716 weeks: <120/80mm Hg, N=79720 weeks: <140/90 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: <135/80 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: <130/80 mm Hg, N=74520 weeks: <120/80 mm Hg, N=745
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide49.123.017.37.852.429.824.811.268.140.034.317.677.851.346.228.781.355.650.128.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide92.387.279.547.496.689.374.890.670.165.044.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide80.869.256.026.189.776.959.076.152.646.223.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Achieving Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction Ranges From Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
4 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=1894 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=1894 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=1894 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=1898 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=1818 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=1818 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=1818 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=18112 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=17012 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=17012 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=17012 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=17016 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=15616 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=15616 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=15616 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=15620 weeks: ≤ 15 mm Hg, N=15020 weeks: >15 and ≤ 30 mm Hg, N=15020 weeks: >30 and ≤ 45 mm Hg, N=15020 weeks: >45 mm Hg, N=150
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide56.136.07.90.054.134.311.60.035.338.222.93.528.240.426.35.126.040.026.77.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide91.584.571.447.498.289.878.590.571.061.544.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide81.369.353.031.594.480.664.378.552.743.527.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on a Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 20 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 20 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide100.0100.095.045.0100.095.095.0100.095.095.040.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Previously on a Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Achieving the Blood Pressure Goals From Baseline to 12 Weeks

(NCT00791258)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Systolic blood pressure <140 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <135 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <130 mmHgSystolic blood pressure <120 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <90 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <85 mmHgDiastolic blood pressure <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine Tablets + Hydrochlorothiazide100.090.075.025.0100.095.075.0100.070.065.020.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daytime Mean (6am to 10pm) Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the daytime, while awake (6am to 10pm) mean systolic blood pressure measured at Week 4 and Week 8 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night Daytime mean is the average of measurements recorded between the hours of 6 AM (inclusive) and 10 PM (exclusive) included in the 24-hour mean calculations. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-24.5-26.7
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-25.1-28.4
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-18.9-21.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Daytime Mean (6am to 10pm) Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the daytime, while awake (6am to 10pm) mean diastolic blood pressure measured at Week 4 and Week 8relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Daytime mean is the average of measurements recorded between the hours of 6 AM (inclusive) and 10 PM (exclusive) included in the 24-hour mean calculations. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-14.2-15.3
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-14.7-16.6
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-10.7-12.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure as Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure at week4 and week 8 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-24.1-26.4
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-24.4-27.9
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-18.4-20.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the 0 to 24-hours-after-dosing mean diastolic blood pressure measured at Week 4 and Week 8 relative to baseline. . Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The mean consists of the average of measurements collected over the subsequent 24 hours. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-13.9-15.1
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-14.4-16.4
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-10.5-12.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 12-hr Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the 0 to 12 hours-after-dosing mean Systolic Blood Pressure measured at Week 4 and Week 8 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night The mean consists of the average (arithmetic mean) of measurements collected at each time frame and includes all observations recorded over the subsequent 12 hours. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-25.0-27.1
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-25.5-28.8
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-19.2-21.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 12-hr Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the 0 to 12 hours-after-dosing mean diastolic blood pressure measured at Week 4 and Week 8 to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The mean consists of the average (arithmetic mean) of measurements collected at each time frame and includes all observations recorded over the subsequent 12 hours. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-14.4-15.4
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-14.8-16.9
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-10.8-12.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.

The change in trough systolic blood pressure measured at week 8 or final visit relative to baseline. Systolic blood pressure is the average of the 3 serial trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 8.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-37.6
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-38.2
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-31.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as <140 mm Hg for Participants Without Diabetes or CKD or <130 mm Hg for Participants With Diabetes or CKD

Percentage of participants who achieve a clinic systolic blood pressure response, defined as <140 mm Hg for participants without diabetes or CKD or <130 mm Hg for participants with diabetes or CKD at each time frame relative to baseline. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6 and Week 8.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2 (n=343; n=334; n=345)Week 4 (n=360; n=347; n=352)Week 6 (n=362; n=350; n=353)Week 8 (n=363; n=350; n=353)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD60.366.176.876.0
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD57.268.973.476.0
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD44.952.364.964.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.

The change in trough systolic blood pressure measured at week 4 relative to baseline. Systolic blood pressure is the average of the 3 serial trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-33.0
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-34.1
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-26.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nighttime Mean (12am to 6am) Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the nighttime, while asleep (12am to 6am) mean diastolic blood pressure measured at Week 4 and Week 8 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Nighttime mean is the average (arithmetic mean) of measurements recorded between the hours of 12 AM (inclusive) and 6 AM (exclusive) included in the 24-hour mean calculations. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-13.4-14.9
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-13.3-15.8
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-9.6-11.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Nighttime Mean (12am to 6am) Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

The change in the nighttime, while asleep (12am to 6am) mean systolic blood pressure measured at Week 4 and Week 8 to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Nighttime mean is the average of measurements recorded between the hours of 12 AM (inclusive) and 6 AM (exclusive) included in the 24-hour mean calculations. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-22.3-25.2
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-21.9-26.3
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-16.6-19.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in trough systolic blood pressure measured at week 4 and week 8 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Trough is the average of all measurements recorded from 22 to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-13.4-14.6
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-14.6-15.9
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-10.9-12.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in trough systolic blood pressure measured at week 4 and week 8 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Trough is the average of all measurements recorded from 22 to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=223; n=227; n=219)Week 8 (n=290; n=278; n=281)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-22.4-24.9
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-23.6-26.8
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-17.4-19.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure

The change in trough diastolic blood pressure measured at week 4 and week 8 relative to baseline. Diastolic blood pressure is the average of the 3 serial trough sitting diastolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=360; n=347; n=352)Week 8 (n=363; n=350; n=353)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-13.6-16.1
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD-14.2-16.5
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-10.4-12.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Diastolic AND Systolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as <140/90 mm Hg for Participants Without Diabetes or Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) or <130/80 mm Hg for Participants With Diabetes or CKD

Percentage of participants who achieve both a clinic diastolic blood pressure response, defined as <140/90 mm Hg for participants without diabetes or chronic kidney disease (CKD) or <130/80 mm Hg for participants with diabetes or CKD at each time frame relative to baseline. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6 and Week 8.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2 (n=343; n=334; n=345)Week 4 (n=360; n=347; n=352)Week 6 (n=362; n=350; n=353)Week 8 (n=363; n=350; n=353)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD51.358.168.869.4
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD48.561.465.468.9
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD35.944.655.554.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure Response, Defined as Defined as <90 mm Hg for Participants Without Diabetes or CKD or <80 mm Hg for Participants With Diabetes or CKD

Percentage of participants who achieve a clinic diastolic blood pressure response, defined as defined as <90 mm Hg for participants without diabetes or CKD or <80 mm Hg for participants with diabetes or CKD at each time frame relative to baseline. (NCT00846365)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6 and Week 8.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 2 (n=343; n=334; n=345)Week 4 (n=360; n=347; n=352)Week 6 (n=362; n=350; n=353)Week 8 (n=363; n=350; n=353)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD63.671.477.979.9
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg Plus Chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg QD66.273.876.979.1
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD47.858.266.966.0

[back to top]

Mean Change of Sitting dBP From Baseline to Week 12

The difference in the sitting diastolic blood pressure (dBP) at trough, i.e. 24±2 hours after drug administration, from base line to Week 12. (NCT00857285)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Olmesartan Medoxomil-14.80
Losartan Potassium-11.60

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Achieving Target Sitting Blood Pressure of Less Than 130/85

(NCT00858702)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 8

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
Olmesartan Tablets and a Calcium Channel Blocker Tablet34.0
Olmesartan Medoxomil Tablets and a Diuretic59.2

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patients That Achieved a Blood Pressure Goal of Less Than 130/85 in First Titrated Group (Olmesartan 20 mg + 12.5 mg Hydrochlorothiazide)

Number of patients that achieved a blood pressure goal of less than 130/85 in first titrated group (olmesartan 20 mg + 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide)If BP was > or = to 140/90 at 4,8, or 9 wks the participant went to next level of medication for an additional 4-9 weeks (NCT00890591)
Timeframe: 4 to 9 weeks on combination therapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Olmesartan + Hydrochlorothiazide33

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Achieved a Blood Pressure Goal of Less Than 130/85 in Third Titrated Group (Olmesartan + Hydrochorothiazide + Amlodipine)

Number of patients that achieved a blood pressure goal of less than 130/85 in third titrated group (olmesartan 40 mg + 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide + amlodipine 5 mg). This combination was maintained as long as the participant's blood pressure remained within predefined parameters. If not, participant discontinued for lack of efficacy. (NCT00890591)
Timeframe: 4 - 9 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Olmesartan + Hydrochlorothiazide + Amlodipine12

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Achieved a Blood Pressure Goal of Less Than 130/85 in Second Titrated Group (Olmesartan 40 mg + 25 mg Hydrochlorothiazide)

Number of patients that achieved a blood pressure goal of less than 130/85 in second titrated group (olmesartan 40 mg + 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide). If BP was > or = to 140/90 at 4,8, or 9 wks the participant went to next level of medication for an additional 4-9 weeks. (NCT00890591)
Timeframe: 4 to 9 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Olmesartan + Hydrochlorothiazide41

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Achieved a Blood Pressure Goal of Less Than 130/85 (Olmesartan 20 mg Monotherapy)

Number of patients that achieved a blood pressure (BP) goal of less than 130/85 in the first group (olmesartan monotherapy 20 mg). If BP was > or = to 140/90 at 4,8, or 9 wks the participant went to next level for an additional 4-9 weeks at the next medication level (NCT00890591)
Timeframe: 4 - 9 wks of olmesartan monotherapy

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Olmesartan Monotherapy38

[back to top]

Change in 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure Assessed by 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.

Three cuff blood pressure measurements were taken at each visit. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: Baseline (8 weeks) to 16 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan(OLM) 40 Mg-Amlodipine(AML) 10 mg-1.9
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-5.1
OLM 40-AML 10-HCTZ 25-6.6

[back to top]

Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP) of the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg vs. OM/AML 40/10 mg

Three cuff blood pressure measurements were taken at each visit. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: baseline (8 weeks) to 16 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan(OLM) 40 Mg-Amlodipine(AML) 10 mg-6.1
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-7.1
OLM 40-AML 10-HCTZ 25-8.9

[back to top]

In Non-responders, the Change in 24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure Assessed by 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.

In non-responders, the change in 24-hour diastolic blood pressure assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement from the beginning to the end of Period 4. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: Week 16 to week 32

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-2.2
OLM 40-AML 10-HCTZ 25-4.4

[back to top]

In Non-responders, the Change in 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure Assessed by 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.

In non-responders, the change in 24-hour systolic blood pressure assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement from the beginning to the end of Period 4. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: Week 16 to week 32

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-0.4
OLM 40-AML 10-HCTZ 25-4.3

[back to top]

In Non-responders, the Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure Associated With the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg.

Change in seated diastolic blood pressure from the beginning to the end of Period 4. Three cuff blood pressure measurements were taken at each visit. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: week 24 to week 32

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 (Non-responders)-6.7
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 (Non-responders)-7.9

[back to top]

In Non-responders, the Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure Associated With the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg.

Change in seated systolic blood pressure from the beginning to the end of Period 4. Three cuff blood pressure measurements were taken at each visit. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: week 24 to week 32

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 (Non-responders)-5.5
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 (Non-responders)-7.8

[back to top]

Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SeSBP) of the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg vs. OM/AML 40/10 mg

Three cuff blood pressure measurements were taken at each visit. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: baseline (8 weeks) to week 16

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan(OLM) 40 Mg-Amlodipine(AML) 10 mg-6.9
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-8.6
OLM 40-AML 10-HCTZ 25-10.5

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Achieving Blood Pressure (BP) Goal at Week 16.

Achieving blood pressure goal is defined as seated blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg; 130/80 mm Hg for participants with diabetes and/or other chronic renal and/or chronic cardiovascular disease. Three cuff blood pressure measurements were taken at each visit. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: baseline (week 8) to week 16

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Olmesartan(OLM) 40 Mg-Amlodipine(AML) 10 mg65
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.579
OLM 40-AML 10-HCTZ 25111

[back to top]

Change in 24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) Assessed by 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement (ABPM).

Three cuff blood pressure measurements were taken at each visit. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: Baseline (8 weeks) to 16 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan(OLM) 40 Mg-Amlodipine(AML) 10 mg-2.1
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-4.0
OLM 40-AML 10-HCTZ 25-5.3

[back to top]

In Non-responders, the Number of Subject Meeting Their Blood Pressure Goals Associated With the Triple Combinations OM/AML/HCTZ 40/10/12.5 and 40/10/25 mg.

The number of non-responding participants who achieved their blood pressure goals at the end of Period 4. Achieving blood pressure goal is defined as seated blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg; 130/80 mm Hg for participants with diabetes and/or other chronic renal and/or chronic cardiovascular disease. Three cuff blood pressure measurements were taken at each visit. (NCT00902538)
Timeframe: week 24 to week 32

InterventionParticipants (Number)
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 (Non-responders)31
OLM 40-AML 10-Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 (Non-responders)89

[back to top]

Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 22 to Week 26

(NCT00923091)
Timeframe: Week 22 to week 26

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
OLM/AML/HCTZ 40/5/12.5mg Nonresponders Randomized to 40/5/12.5-2.7
OLM/AML/HCTZ 40/5/12.5mg Nonresponders Randomized to 40/5/25-3.8

[back to top]

Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure From Week 18 to Week 22

(NCT00923091)
Timeframe: Week 18 to week 22

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 20mg/5mg/12.5 mg-3.3
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/12.5mg-4.1

[back to top]

Change in Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP).

Baseline blood pressure was defined as the average values obtained at the randomization visit and at the visit prior to randomization (NCT00923091)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 10

Interventionmm HG (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 20mg/5mg/12.5 mg-22.5
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/12.5mg-22.5
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/25mg-23.0
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/10mg/12.5mg-23.9
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/10mg/25mg-23.8
Olmesartan/Amlodipine 20mg/5mg-20.5
Olmesartan/Amlodipine 40mg/5mg-21.2
Olmesartan/Amlodipine 40mg/10mg-22.1

[back to top]

Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP) During Open-Label Period VI (Titration Effect From OM/AML/HCTZ 40/5/25 to 40/10/25.

(NCT00923091)
Timeframe: Week 26 to week 54

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OLM/AML/HCTZ 40/5/25 Titrated to 40/10/25-11.9

[back to top]

Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SeDBP).

(NCT00923091)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 10

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 20mg/5mg/12.5 mg-33.2
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/12.5mg-33.7
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/25mg-35.3
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/10mg/12.5mg-35.5
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/10mg/25mg-36.2
Olmesartan/Amlodipine 20mg/5mg-29.9
Olmesartan/Amlodipine 40mg/5mg-30.4
Olmesartan/Amlodipine 40mg/10mg-32.8

[back to top]

Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Week 18 to Week 22

(NCT00923091)
Timeframe: Week 18 to week 22

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 20mg/5mg/12.5 mg-5.7
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/12.5mg-6.5

[back to top]

Change in Seated Systolic Blood Pressure From Week 22 to Week 26

(NCT00923091)
Timeframe: Week 22 to week 26

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
OLM/AML/HCTZ 40/5/12.5mg Nonresponders Randomized to 40/5/12.5-4.5
OLM/AML/HCTZ40/5/12.5mg Nonresponders Randomized to 40/5/25-6.7

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Goal at Week 10

Blood pressure treatment goal was defined as blood pressure <140/90 mmHg or <130/80 mmHg for subjects with diabetes, chronic renal disease, or chronic cardiovascular disease. (NCT00923091)
Timeframe: baseline to week 10

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 20mg/5mg/12.5 mg177
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/12.5mg176
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/25mg197
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/10mg/12.5mg190
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/10mg/25mg179
Olmesartan/Amlodipine 20mg/5mg144
Olmesartan/Amlodipine 40mg/5mg155
Olmesartan/Amlodipine 40mg/10mg166

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Goal at Week 26

Blood pressure treatment goal was defined as blood pressure <140/90 mmHg or <130/80 mmHg for subjects with diabetes, chronic renal disease, or chronic cardiovascular disease. (NCT00923091)
Timeframe: Week 22 to week 26

InterventionParticipants (Number)
OLM/AML/HCTZ 40/5/12.5mg Nonresponders Randomized to 40/5/12.529
OLM/AML/HCTZ 40/5/12.5mg Nonresponders Randomized to 40/5/2547

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Reaching Blood Pressure Goal From Week 18 to Week 22

Blood pressure treatment goal was defined as blood pressure <140/90 mmHg or <130/80 mmHg for subjects with diabetes, chronic renal disease, or chronic cardiovascular disease. (NCT00923091)
Timeframe: Week 18 to week 22

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 20mg/5mg/12.5 mg63
Olmesartan/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide 40mg/5mg/12.5mg137

[back to top]

Incremental Change From Week 4 to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SSBP)

The change from Week 4 in trough SSBP at Week 8 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan-1.1
Combined Olmesartan-1.4
Losartan0.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 4

In week 4, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Combined Olmesartan-7.3-4.8
Losartan-5.9-3.7
Olmesartan-7.3-4.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 8

In week 8, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Systolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressure
Combined Olmesartan-9.2-6.1
Losartan-5.6-3.6
Olmesartan-9.1-6.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Blood Pressure During the Final 2, 4, and 6 Hours of the Dosing Interval at Week 4

In week 4, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings taken in the final 2, 4, and 6 hours of the 24-hour ABPM cycle are summarized. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
2 hour systolic blood pressure2 hour diastolic blood pressure4 hour systolic blood pressure4 hour diastolic blood pressure6 hour systolic blood pressure6 hour diastolic blood pressure
Combined Olmesartan-8.4-5.6-8.3-5.6-8.0-5.4
Losartan-6.8-3.8-6.5-4.1-6.2-3.9
Olmesartan-8.7-5.8-8.4-5.8-8.0-5.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Blood Pressure During the Final 2, 4, and 6 Hours of the Dosing Interval at Week 8

In week 8, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings taken in the final 2, 4, and 6 hours of the 24-hour ABPM cycle are summarized. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
2 hour systolic blood pressure2 hour diastolic blood pressure4 hour systolic blood pressure4 hour diastolic blood pressure6 hour systolic blood pressure6 hour diastolic blood pressure
Combined Olmesartan-9.5-6.0-10.1-6.7-9.7-6.5
Losartan-7.2-4.0-6.9-4.1-6.5-4.0
Olmesartan-10.0-6.3-10.5-7.1-10.0-6.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am to 4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10pm to 6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 4

In week 4, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. Daytime (8am to 4pm) and nighttime (10pm to 6am) systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings are summarized. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Daytime systolic blood pressureDaytime diastolic blood pressureNighttime systolic blood pressureNighttime diastolic blood pressure
Combined Olmesartan-7.5-5.2-6.8-4.3
Losartan-5.8-3.5-5.5-3.4
Olmesartan-7.6-5.4-6.7-4.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (8am to 4pm) and Mean Nighttime (10pm to 6am) Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 8

In week 8, participants arrived at the site in the morning without having taken that day's dose of medication. Once the ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) had been applied, medication was taken and the participant wore the ABPM for a period of 24-hours. Daytime (8am to 4pm) and nighttime (10pm to 6am) systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings are summarized. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Daytime systolic blood pressureDaytime diastolic blood pressureNighttime systolic blood pressureNighttime diastolic blood pressure
Combined Olmesartan-8.7-6.1-9.3-6.1
Losartan-5.2-3.7-6.3-4.1
Olmesartan-8.7-6.2-9.3-6.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Blood Pressure

The change from baseline in trough systolic and diastolic blood pressure at Week 2 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Diastolic blood pressureSystolic blood pressure
Olmesartan-8.3-11.9
Placebo Followed by Olmesartan-4.0-3.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Ambulatory Blood Pressure Goal of < 135/85 mmHg at Week 8

Participants from pre-selected sites had 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure readings collected. Daytime readings were results collected between 8am and 4pm. Nighttime readings were results collected between 10pm and 6am. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Week 8

,,
Interventionpercentage of population (Number)
Mean 24-hourMean DaytimeMean Nighttime
Combined Olmesartan58.532.177.4
Losartan40.921.866.4
Olmesartan59.232.776.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Goals at Week 4

"Percentage of participants who achieved the following goals:~Systolic blood pressure: <140 mmHg, <135 mmHg, <130 mmHg, <120 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure: <90 mmHg, <85 mmHg, <80 mmHg Blood pressure: <140/90 mmHg, <135/80 mmHg, <130/80 mmHg" (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Week 4

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants analyzed (Number)
Systolic BP <140 mmHgSystolic BP <135 mmHgSystolic BP <130 mmHgSystolic BP <120 mmHgDiastolic BP <90 mmHgDiastolic BP <85 mmHgDiastolic BP <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHg
Combined Olmesartan36.727.116.53.538.823.910.426.57.65.9
Losartan25.614.17.22.024.513.04.614.32.21.5
Olmesartan37.928.116.83.139.624.210.627.37.45.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Goals at Week 8

"Percentage of participants who achieved the following goals:~Systolic blood pressure: <140 mmHg, <135 mmHg, <130 mmHg, <120 mmHg Diastolic blood pressure: <90 mmHg, <85 mmHg, <80 mmHg Blood pressure: <140/90 mmHg, <135/80 mmHg, <130/80 mmHg, <120/80 mmHg" (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Week 8

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants analyzed (Number)
Systolic BP <140 mmHgSystolic BP <135 mmHgSystolic BP <130 mmHgSystolic BP <120 mmHgDiastolic BP <90 mmHgDiastolic BP <85 mmHgDiastolic BP <80 mmHgBlood pressure <140/90 mmHgBlood pressure <135/80 mmHgBlood pressure <130/80 mmHgBlood pressure <120/80 mmHg
Combined Olmesartan41.030.018.46.642.522.911.831.69.97.54.7
Losartan28.920.413.13.830.515.56.619.54.94.52.3
Olmesartan41.129.918.26.843.222.912.232.610.27.64.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SDBP)

The change from baseline in trough SDBP at Week 4 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Day 0, Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan-9.0
Combined Olmesartan-8.8
Losartan-6.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SSBP)

The change from baseline in trough SSBP at Week 4 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Day 0, Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan-12.3
Combined Olmesartan-12.0
Losartan-8.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SDBP)

The change from baseline in trough SDBP at Week 8 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Day 0, Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan-9.8
Combined Olmesartan-9.7
Losartan-7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Systolic Blood Pressure (SSBP)

The change from baseline in trough SSBP at Week 8 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Day 0, Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan-13.6
Combined Olmesartan-13.6
Losartan-9.7

[back to top]

Incremental Change From Week 4 to Week 8 in Trough, Cuff, Seated Diastolic Blood Pressure (SDBP)

The change from Week 4 in trough SDBP at Week 8 as measured by the Omron monitor. Morning doses of study medication were taken after the exam on study visit days, therefore exam measurements were taken when medication levels were at its lowest ('the trough'). Following a 5-minute rest period, three separate blood pressure measurements were taken with a full 2-minute (not exceeding 5 minutes) interval between measurements, with the cuff fully deflated between measurements. The mean of the 3 seated blood pressure measurements constitute the blood pressure value for the visit. (NCT00949884)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Olmesartan-0.8
Combined Olmesartan-0.9
Losartan0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event

An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product without regard to causality. (NCT00996281)
Timeframe: From Week 0 (Day 1) to Week 52.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone78.5
Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide76.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Serum Creatinine Elevations Greater Than 50% From Baseline and Greater Than the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)

Serum creatinine was measured at every visit and evaluated as a laboratory parameter of special interest. The percentage of participants with creatinine increase ≥50% from Baseline and greater than ULN was summarized: - At any visit (includes transient and persistent elevations). - At the Final Visit (includes persistent elevations and participants whose first elevation may have been at the Final Visit). - At least 2 consecutive visits (includes only persistent elevations). (NCT00996281)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At any postbaseline visitat the Final Visit≥2 consecutive elevations
Azilsartan Medoxomil and Chlorthalidone14.25.95.1
Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide5.81.01.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reached Target Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure of <140 mm Hg and/or Reduction of ≥20 mm Hg From Baseline.

Percentage of participants who achieve a clinic systolic blood pressure response measured at each week indicated, defined as less than 140 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the non-missing values of the 3serial trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4 (n=343; n=330; n=352)Week 8 (n=344; n=330; n=353)Week 12 (n=344; n=330; n=354)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD87.893.393.0
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD90.092.494.2
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD79.885.689.3

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Who Reached Target Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure of <140 mm Hg and/or Reduction of ≥20 mm Hg From Baseline and Target Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure of <90 mm Hg and/or Reduction of ≥10 mm Hg From Baseline.

Percentage of participants who achieve both a clinic diastolic and systolic blood pressure response measured at each week indicated, defined as less than 90 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg AND less than 140 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg. Diastolic and systolic blood pressure is based on the arithmetic mean of the non-missing values of the 3 serial trough sitting blood pressure measurements. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12.

,,
Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Week 4 (n=343; n=330; n=352)Week 8 (n=344; n=330; n=353)Week 12 (n=344; n=330; n=354)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD81.388.191.3
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD84.887.392.4
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD74.481.084.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in 24-hour mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 12 or final visit relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-19.4
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-20.7
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-16.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Nighttime (12 AM to 6 AM) Systolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the mean nighttime (12am to 6am) systolic blood pressure measured at week 12 or final visit relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Mean nighttime is the average (arithmetic mean) of measurements recorded between the hours of 12 AM (inclusive) and 6 AM (exclusive). (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-29.6
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-31.8
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-23.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Nighttime (12 AM to 6 AM) Diastolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the mean nighttime (12am to 6am) diastolic blood pressure measured at week 12 or final visit relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Mean nighttime is the average (arithmetic mean) of measurements recorded between the hours of 12 AM (inclusive) and 6 AM (exclusive). (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-17.5
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-18.0
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-14.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (6 AM to 10 PM) Systolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in daytime (6am to 10pm) mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 12 or final visit relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Daytime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 6 AM (inclusive) and 10 PM (exclusive). (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-35.3
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-37.9
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-28.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Daytime (6 AM to 10 PM) Diastolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in daytime (6am to 10pm) mean diastolic blood pressure measured at week 12 or final visit relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Daytime mean is the average of all measurements recorded between the hours of 6 AM (inclusive) and 10 PM (exclusive). (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-20.1
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-21.8
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-17.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in 24-hour mean systolic blood pressure measured at week 12 or final visit relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The 24-hour mean is the average of all measurements recorded for 24 hours after dosing. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-33.9
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-36.3
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-27.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Reached Target Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure of <90 mm Hg and/or Reduction of ≥10 mm Hg From Baseline.

Percentage of participants who achieve a clinic diastolic blood pressure response measured at each week indicated, defined as less than 90 mm Hg and/or reduction from baseline of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg. Diastolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the non-missing values of the 3 serial trough sitting diastolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12.

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4 (n=343; n=330; n=352)Week 8 (n=344; n=330; n=353)Week 12 (n=344; n=330; n=354)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD89.290.794.5
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD89.790.995.8
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD85.287.891.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Systolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in trough systolic blood pressure measured at week 12 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Trough is the average of all measurements recorded from 22 to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-32.9
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-34.9
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-25.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.

The change in sitting trough clinic systolic blood pressure measured at each week indicated relative to baseline. Trough blood pressure is the average of the non-missing values of the 3 serial trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=343; n=330; n=352)Week 8 (n=344; n=330; n=353)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-34.7-39.1
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-36.7-39.4
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-29.7-33.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Diastolic Blood Pressure.

The change in sitting trough clinic diastolic blood pressure measured at each week indicated relative to baseline. Trough blood pressure is the average (arithmetic mean) of the non-missing values of the 3 serial trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 4 (n=343; n=330; n=352)Week 8 (n=344; n=330; n=353)Week 12 (n=344; n=330; n=354)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-14.9-17.0-18.8
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-15.8-17.7-20.5
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-11.7-13.9-16.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Mean Systolic Blood Pressure During Each Hour of the 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change from baseline for each hour interval of the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measured at week 12 or final visit. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The mean consists of the average (arithmetic mean) of measurements collected at each hour. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
0 to 1 Hour (n=232; n=212; n=237)1 to 2 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)2 to 3 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)3 to 4 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)4 to 5 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)5 to 6 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)6 to 7 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)7 to 8 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)8 to 9 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)9 to 10 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)10 to 11 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)11 to 12 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)12 to 13 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)13 to 14 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)14 to 15 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)15 to 16 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)16 to 17 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)17 to 18 Hour (n=231; n=214; n=238)18 to 19 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)19 to 20 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)20 to 21 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)21 to 22 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)22 to 23 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)23 to 24 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-33.6-33.4-36.7-36.6-36.8-37.2-36.3-37.2-37.3-36.9-36.1-35.2-34.8-34.1-33.4-30.9-29.6-28.5-29.5-29.7-28.2-30.6-32.9-33.1
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-36.2-36.4-39.3-40.3-40.8-41.2-38.6-38.5-38.1-38.0-37.6-38.2-36.2-35.3-35.0-32.9-31.1-30.8-31.9-32.5-31.2-32.8-34.0-35.8
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-26.8-27.5-30.0-29.6-30.1-31.5-29.8-29.7-30.5-30.8-29.4-29.3-27.7-26.4-26.2-25.3-24.5-23.1-24.3-23.5-23.0-24.6-25.9-26.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure During Each Hour of the 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change from baseline for each hour interval of the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measured at week 12 or final visit. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The mean consists of the average (arithmetic mean) of measurements collected at each hour. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
0 to 1 Hour (n=232; n=212; n=237)1 to 2 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)2 to 3 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)3 to 4 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)4 to 5 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)5 to 6 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)6 to 7 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)7 to 8 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)8 to 9 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)9 to 10 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)10 to 11 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)11 to 12 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)12 to 13 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)13 to 14 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)14 to 15 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)15 to 16 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)16 to 17 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)17 to 18 Hour (n=231; n=214; n=238)18 to 19 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)19 to 20 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)20 to 21 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)21 to 22 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)22 to 23 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)23 to 24 Hour (n=232; n=214; n=238)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-18.2-18.8-21.2-20.8-21.7-20.9-20.8-20.5-20.7-21.0-19.7-19.3-19.2-19.6-18.9-17.8-17.2-16.6-17.4-17.8-16.7-17.8-19.5-20.2
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-20.4-20.9-23.4-23.7-23.7-23.6-22.0-21.9-21.5-21.9-20.7-21.2-20.3-19.5-19.7-18.6-16.9-17.1-18.1-18.5-18.4-18.5-19.6-21.0
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-15.2-15.9-17.7-18.2-17.9-19.0-18.0-17.7-17.9-18.3-16.7-17.0-16.0-15.3-15.4-14.5-13.9-13.2-14.3-13.8-13.9-14.7-15.6-16.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Trough, Sitting, Clinic Systolic Blood Pressure.

The change in sitting trough clinic systolic blood pressure measured at week 12 or final visit relative to baseline. Trough blood pressure is the average of the non-missing values of the 3 serial trough sitting systolic blood pressure measurements. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-42.5
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-44.0
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-37.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Mean Systolic Blood Pressure at 0 to 12 Hours After Dosing by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the mean 12 hour systolic blood pressure measured at week 12 or final visit relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The mean consists of the average (arithmetic mean) of measurements. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-36.2
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-38.8
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-29.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure at 0 to 12 Hours After Dosing by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in the mean 12 hour diastolic blood pressure measured at week 12 or final visit relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. The mean consists of the average (arithmetic mean) of measurements. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-20.4
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-22.2
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-17.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Diastolic Blood Pressure by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

The change in trough diastolic blood pressure measured at week 12 relative to baseline. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measures blood pressure at regular intervals throughout the day and night. Trough is the average of all measurements recorded from 22 to 24 hours after dosing. (NCT01033071)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12.

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Azilsartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-19.8
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40-80mg/Chlorthalidone 12.5-25mg QD-20.2
Olmesartan Medoxomil 20-40mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-25mg QD-16.0

[back to top] [back to top]

Change From Baseline in SBP and DBP at Week 12 With Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

(NCT01200407)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Baseline: SBPBaseline: DBPChange at Week 12: SBP LOCFChange at Week12: DBP LOCF
Normetec161.698.9-35.8-19.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 Without (w/o) LOCF

(NCT01200407)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Change at Week 4: SBP w/o LOCFChange at Week 4: DBP w/o LOCFChange and Week 8: SBP w/o LOCFChange and Week 8: DBP w/o LOCFChange and Week 12: SBP w/o LOCFChange and Week 12: DBP w/o LOCF
Normetec-24.7-13.2-33.0-17.6-36.3-19.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last study drug administration (Week 12) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs. (NCT01200407)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 28 days after last study drug administration (Week 12)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Number of Participants with AEsNumber of Participants with SAEs
Normetec60

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants at Final Visit Who Achieve Target Systolic Blood Pressure <130 mm Hg

Systolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 serial sitting systolic blood pressure measurements. Percentage of participants who achieve a sitting clinic systolic blood pressure response defined as less than 130 mm Hg at Week 52. (NCT01309828)
Timeframe: Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azilsartan Medoxomil + Chlorthalidone69.3
Olmesartan Medoxomil + Hydrochlorothiazide78.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants at Final Visit Who Achieved Both a Clinic Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Response

Systolic/diastolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 serial sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure measurements. Percentage of participants who achieved both a sitting clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressure response, defined as systolic blood pressure less than 130 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg at Week 52. (NCT01309828)
Timeframe: Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azilsartan Medoxomil + Chlorthalidone58.7
Olmesartan Medoxomil + Hydrochlorothiazide73.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants at Final Visit Who Achieved Target Diastolic Blood Pressure <80 mm Hg

Diastolic blood pressure is the arithmetic mean of the 3 serial sitting diastolic blood pressure measurements. Percentage of participants at Week 52 who achieved a sitting clinic diastolic blood pressure response, defined as less than 80 mm Hg. (NCT01309828)
Timeframe: Week 52

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azilsartan Medoxomil + Chlorthalidone80.0
Olmesartan Medoxomil + Hydrochlorothiazide87.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least 1 Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, led to a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event that may have required intervention to prevent any of items above. (NCT01309828)
Timeframe: From the first dose of open-label study drug until 14 days (or 30 days for a serious adverse event) after the last dose of open- label study drug (up to 56 weeks).

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Adverse EventsAdverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationSerious Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationDeath
Azilsartan Medoxomil + Chlorthalidone6817850
Olmesartan Medoxomil + Hydrochlorothiazide5815941

[back to top]

Insulin Sensitivity by Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Testing (Change Over Time)

Data collected from the intravenous glucose tolerance tests included blood concentrations of glucose and insulin. Glucose was measured immediately on a YSI glucose analyzer and insulin was measured via ELISA colormetric kits once all study samples were collected. To analyze changes in insulin sensitivity, the MINMOD software was used. The MINMOD software uses Bergman's minimal model to determine insulin sensitivity during an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Both glucose and insulin values were inserted at each timepoint collected (33 in total over the 3-hour protocol) and the software was run to generate the insulin sensitivity value at baseline and post-test. This information was then used to calculate the change of insulin sensitivity from baseline to post-testing after each 8-week intervention. (NCT01684748)
Timeframe: Baseline testing to post-testing after 8-week intervention

Interventionmu/L/min (Mean)
Olmesartan Medoxomil0.253
No Drug Intervention-0.804

[back to top]

Collagen Gene Expression in Skeletal Muscle (Change Over Time)

RNA extraction and quantification were determined using an RNeasy Mini Fibrous Kit and DNase I treatment (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) in accordance to the manufacturer's directions for mRNA extraction. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) measured the expression of collagen III using an ABI PRISM 7900 Sequence Detection System instrument and TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Relative gene expression levels were determined using the number of cycles necessary to reach threshold and results were normalized to cyclophilin B RNA levels. (NCT01684748)
Timeframe: Baseline testing to post-testing after 8-week intervention

InterventionArbitrary unit (AU) (Mean)
Pre-Olmesartan medoxomilPost-Olmesartan medoxomil
Olmesartan Medoxomil1491774

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Systolic Blood Pressure (maSBP)

An Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) measured a participant's blood pressure over a 24 hour period using an automated validated monitoring device at baseline, week 12 and at week 52 starting one day before each visit. The 24 hour maSBP was calculated by taking the mean of all ambulatory systolic blood pressure readings for the 24 hour period. (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to week 12 (n= 164, 162)Baseline to week 52 (n= 174, 176)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-13.25-14.15
Olmesartan-9.14-14.32

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Diastolic Blood Pressure (maDBP)

An Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitor (ABPM) measured a participant's blood pressure over a 24 hour period using an automated validated monitoring device at baseline, week 12 and at week 52 starting one day before each visit. The 24 hour maDBP was calculated by taking the mean of all ambulatory systolic blood pressure readings for the 24 hour period. (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to week 12 (n= 164, 162)Baseline to week 52 (n= 174, 176)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-7.44-8.85
Olmesartan-5.48-8.44

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Pulse Pressure (maPP)

Mean 24 hour ambulatory pulse pressure was calculated as the difference between the mean 24 hour systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure in corresponding visits i.e. baseline, week 12 and week 52. (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to Week 12 (n=164, 162 )Baseline to week 52 (n=174, 176)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-5.77-5.26
Olmesartan-3.69-5.91

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Central Aortic Systolic Pressure (CASP) at 52 Weeks

"Central aortic blood pressure was derived from peripheral pressure waveforms recorded noninvasively from the brachial artery using a cuff-based device. This technique uses the brachial pressure and a signal processing algorithm to transform brachial signals into central blood pressure (BP) waveforms. When the aortic pressure waveform was derived, key pulse wave analysis (PWA) parameters, such as CASP was calculated by the system software.~At the first study visit, the arm with the highest systolic blood pressure (SBP) was used for all subsequent PWA. Brachial PWA measurements were performed on the same arm that the office blood pressures were taken. Two pulse waveform measurements, meeting all quality control criteria were captured at baseline and at week 12 visits." (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: baseline, 52 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-16.18
Olmesartan-14.70

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Central Aortic Systolic Pressure (CASP) at 12 Weeks

"Central aortic blood pressure was derived from peripheral pressure waveforms recorded noninvasively from the brachial artery using a cuff-based device. This technique uses the brachial pressure and a signal processing algorithm to transform brachial signals into central blood pressure (BP) waveforms. When the aortic pressure waveform was derived, key pulse wave analysis (PWA) parameters, such as CASP was calculated by the system software.~At the first study visit, the arm with the highest systolic blood pressure (SBP) was used for all subsequent PWA. Brachial PWA measurements were performed on the same arm that the office blood pressures were taken. Two pulse waveform measurements, meeting all quality control criteria were captured at baseline and at week 12 visits." (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-12.57
Olmesartan-8.90

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Pulse Pressure (msPP)

Mean sitting pulse pressure for each patient and visit was calculated as the difference between the calculated values of mean sitting systolic blood pressure and mean sitting diastolic blood pressure. (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to week 12 (n=226,222)Baseline to week 52 (n= 226, 223)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-13.13-15.02
Olmesartan-8.86-13.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP)

At the first study visit, the patient had his/her blood pressure (BP) measured in both arms; the arm in which the highest sitting SBP was found was used for all subsequent readings throughout the study. At each study visit, after the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, SBP were measured 3 times using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 1- to 2-minute intervals and the mean of those 3 measurements was used as the average sitting office BP for that visit. (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to week 12 (n=226, 222)Baseline to week 52 (n=226,223)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-20.84-23.91
Olmesartan-14.57-21.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP)

At the first study visit, the patient had his/her blood pressure (BP) measured in both arms; the arm in which the highest sitting SBP was found was used for all subsequent readings throughout the study. At each study visit, after the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, DBP were measured 3 times using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 1- to 2-minute intervals and the mean of those 3 measurements was used as the average sitting office BP for that visit. (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to week 12 (n=226, 222)Baseline to week 52 (n=226,223)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-7.86-8.92
Olmesartan-5.58-7.85

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)

"Pulse wave velocity recordings were performed on patient while in a supine, face-up position.~Tonometry was performed on the carotid simultaneously with the cuff inflation over the femoral artery. Two pulse wave velocity measures, meeting all quality control criteria were captured at baseline, week 12 and week 52." (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks

,
Interventionmeter/second (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to week 12 (n= 192, 196)Baseline to week 52 ( n= 199, 199)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-0.68-0.83
Olmesartan-0.570.77

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Central Pulse (CPP) Pressure

(NCT01692301)
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to Week 12 (n = 207, 206)Baseline to Week 52 (n = 209, 208)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-6.41-7.16
Olmesartan-3.96-6.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated from mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP) and mean sitting diastolic BP (msDBP) as (2 * msDBP + msSBP)/3. (NCT01692301)
Timeframe: baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline to week 12 (n=226, 222)Baseline to week 52 (n=226, 223)
LCZ696 (Sacubitril/Valsartan)-12.19-13.92
Olmesartan-8.57-12.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure

In this analysis, mean 24 hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure maSBP, mean 24 hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure maDBP, daytime and nightime maSBP and maDBP will be reported. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring over a 24 hour period will be conducted at two time points during the study. (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
maSBPmaDBP
LCZ696 200 mg-12.07-6.36
LCZ696 400 mg-12.76-6.82
Olmesartan 20 mg-10.26-5.61

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Death as Assessment of Safety and Tolerability

Participants were monitored for adverse events, serious adverse events and deaths throughout the study. (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Adverse events (non-serious and seriousSerious adverse eventsDeaths
LCZ696 200 mg14350
LCZ696 400 mg13230
Olmesartan 20 mg13460

[back to top]

Sub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure in Dippers.

Twenty four hour ABPM was performed twice duirng the study at baseline and week 8. The second ABPM assessment was performed only in participants who had successfully completed the ABPM assessment at baseline. Dippers were defined as participants who showed a decrease of at least 10% in maSBP during the night (10pm-6am) compared with the daytime level. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Hour 1Hour 2Hour 3Hour 4Hour 5Hour 6Hour 7Hour 8Hour 9Hour 10Hour 11Hour 12Hour 13Hour 14Hour 15Hour 16Hour 17Hour 18Hour 19Hour 20Hour 21Hour 22Hour 23Hour 24
LCZ696 200 mg-7.93-8.47-9.24-6.86-5.27-7.83-7.15-8.00-8.88-6.89-5.22-402-6.84-4.34-4.53-3.91-6.68-5.87-5.32-5.17-6.97-7.57-6.12-5.23
LCZ696 400 mg-7.38-10.19-9.90-8.65-10.79-11.47-9.13-8.90-9.56-8.14-8.69-7.39-6.33-6.73-5.51-7.20-7.21-6.94-7.61-10.45-9.44-11.37-9.95-8.62
Olmesartan 20 mg-5.99-10.49-9.28-9.80-8.54-5.55-6.23-7.44-6.83-7.07-5.41-5.64-6.69-3.97-3.85-2.60-4.43-6.36-3.94-3.06-6.33-6.61-9.89-7.19

[back to top]

Sub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure in Non-dippers.

Twenty four hour ABPM was performed twice duirng the study at baseline and week 8. The second ABPM assessment was performed only in participants who had successfully completed the ABPM assessment at baseline. Dippers were defined as participants who showed a decrease of at least 10% in maSBP during the night (10pm-6am) compared with the daytime level. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Hour 1Hour 2Hour 3Hour 4Hour 5Hour 6Hour 7Hour 8Hour 9Hour 10Hour 11Hour 12Hour 13Hour 14Hour 15Hour 16Hour 17Hour 18Hour 19Hour 20Hour 21Hour 22Hour 23Hour 24
LCZ696 200 mg-5.93-5.41-3.95-3.68-3.53-4.10-4.85-6.07-4.34-5.53-4.53-5.43-5.57-6.18-7.29-7.68-7.28-8.38-9.02-8.92-8.05-7.16-6.34-5.86
LCZ696 400 mg-6.57-551-4.20-3.53-3.14-3.55-3.31-2.22-4.78-4.48-4.10-4.42-5.01-5.91-5.95-7.26-7.84-8.81-8.77-7.12-7.24-6.55-5.19-6.05
Olmesartan 20 mg-4.57-5.49-4.44-4.70-3.81-2.94-2.71-3.44-4.54-3.57-5.51-4.50-6.04-5.26-7.52-6.96-6.14-5.28-5.20-5.80-6.49-5.65-6.26-4.96

[back to top]

Sub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure in Dippers.

Twenty four hour ABPM was performed twice duirng the study at baseline and week 8. The second ABPM assessment was performed only in participants who had successfully completed the ABPM assessment at baseline. Dippers were defined as participants who showed a decrease of at least 10% in maSBP during the night (10pm-6am) compared with the daytime level. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Hour 1Hour 2Hour 3Hour 4Hour 5Hour 6Hour 7Hour 8Hour 9Hour 10Hour 11Hour 12Hour 13Hour 14Hour 15Hour 16Hour 17Hour 18Hour 19Hour 20Hour 21Hour 22Hour 23Hour 24
LCZ696 200 mg-13.22-17.24-14.99-13.09-11.19-13.66-11.74-13.84-16.33-13.81-12.98-8.99-12.46-9.64-7.73-4.92-10.20-9.84-8.94-8.03-9.47-12.62-9.23-8.43
LCZ696 400 mg-15.02-18.11-16.83-16.37-18.88-19.19-18.07-16.12-15.6415.13-15.93-15.54-13.28-12.33-10.12-12.82-12.43-11.70-12.20-15.04-14.33-17.20-16.63-15.76
Olmesartan 20 mg-9.07-13.95-14.51-14.63-14.64-11.54-11.74-12.99-13.33-10.89-7.66-10.51-11.49-6.66-7.81-4.40-7.19-8.90-5.76-4.83-9.97-9.95-14.09-12.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mg

Sitting BP measurements will be performed at screening through end of study at every visit. Four separate sitting BP measurements will be obtained with a full two minute interval between measurements (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 400 mg-21.67
Olmesartan 20 mg-18.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Between LCZ696 200, and LCZ696 400 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mg

Sitting BP measurements were performed at screening through the end of the study at every study visit. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
LCZ696 200 mg-8.10
LCZ696 400 mg-8.80
Olmesartan 20 mg-6.86

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Ambulatory Pulse Pressure

Ambulatory pulse pressure (PP) is calculated by hourly ambulatory SBP and hourly ambulatory DBP over a 24-hour period. (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 200 mg-5.78
LCZ696 400 mg-5.98
Olmesartan 20 mg-4.58

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Between LCZ696 200 mg Versus Olmesartan 20 mg

Sitting BP measurements will be performed at screening through end of study at every visit. Four separate sitting BP measurements will be obtained with a full two minute interval between measurements. (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 200 mg-20.48
Olmesartan 20 mg-18.15

[back to top]

Sub-group Analysis for Change From Baseline in Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure in Non-dippers.

Twenty four hour ABPM was performed twice duirng the study at baseline and week 8. The second ABPM assessment was performed only in participants who had successfully completed the ABPM assessment at baseline. Dippers were defined as participants who showed a decrease of at least 10% in maSBP during the night (10pm-6am) compared with the daytime level. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Hour 1Hour 2Hour 3Hour 4Hour 5Hour 6Hour 7Hour 8Hour 9Hour 10Hour 11Hour 12Hour 13Hour 14Hour 15Hour 16Hour 17Hour 18Hour 19Hour 20Hour 21Hour 22Hour 23Hour 24
LCZ696 200 mg-11.29-10.51-10.03-8.79-7.84-8.71-9.07-11.07-10.31-11.48-10.01-12.37-13.49-13.20-14.01-15.15-14.00-15.93-16.45-15.29-14.10-13.97-11.91-13.07
LCZ696 400 mg-10.38-11.07-9.82-5.77-8.15-7.77-8.27-8.30-10.65-10.68-8.96-11.5510.64-13.34-11.95-14.04-14.71-15.37-16.04-14.20-15.26-12.79-9.55-11.81
Olmesartan 20 mg-9.37-10.26-9.10-7.55-6.40-6.51-6.93-6.36-8.70-7.55-9.49-8.25-9.82-10.24-12.62-12.52-11.71-9.97-10.37-10.90-10.52-10.67-10.77-7.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressure (msPP)

Four separate sitting BP measurements should be obtained with a full two minute interval between measurements. (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 200 mg-12.35
LCZ696 400 mg-12.93
Olmesartan 20 mg-11.25

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Successful Blood Pressure Control

Successful blood pressure control is defined as msSBP <140 mmHg and msDBP <90 mmHg. (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionNumber of participants (Number)
LCZ696 200 mg256
LCZ696 400 mg270
Olmesartan 20 mg235

[back to top]

Number of Responders

Responders are patients with msSBP response (<140 mmHg or ≥20 mmHg reduction from baseline) and msDBP response (<90 mmHg or ≥10 mmHg reduction from baseline) (NCT01785472)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
LCZ696 200 mg312
LCZ696 400 mg314
Olmesartan 20 mg290

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Augmentation Index at 52 Weeks

Augmentation index (Alx) is the percentage of the central pulse pressure due to wave reflection. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)-2.385
Olmesartan-1.515

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Ascending Aorta Distensibility at 52 Week

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of local aortic distensibility. Ascending aorta distensibility was one of the 3 components for measuring local arota distensibility. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Intervention10^(-3) x mmHg^(-1) (Least Squares Mean)
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)0.269
Olmesartan0.330

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Distal Descending Aorta Distensibility at 52 Weeks

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of local aortic distensibility. Distal descending aorta distensibility was one of the 3 components for measuring local arota distensibility. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Intervention10^(-3) x mmHg^(-1) (Least Squares Mean)
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)0.417
Olmesartan0.498

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Reported Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death

This outcome measure summarizes patients with any adverse events, serious adverse events and death. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,,,
InterventionPatients (Number)
Any Adverse eventsSerious Adverse EventsDeath
Initiation Dose : Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696 200mg)1300
Initiation Dose: Olmesartan 20mg1620
Maintenance Dose: Olmesartan 40 mg2820
Maintenance Dose: Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696 400mg)2100
Olmesartan 40mg +/- Amlodipine3850
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696 400mg) +/- Amlodipine3160

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Local Aortic Strain at 52 Weeks

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of local aortic strain. Local aortic strain was measured by assessing ascending aorta strain, proximal descending aorta strain and distal descending aorta strain. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Ascending Aorta StrainProximal Descending Aorta StrainDistal Descending Aorta Strain
Olmesartan0.453-0.0660.225
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)-0.830-0.284-1.092

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Central Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks

Central blood pressure was determined by measuring central systolic blood pressure , diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Central systolic blood pressureCentral diastolic blood pressureCentral pulse pressure
Olmesartan-13.625-10.432-3.041
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)-16.655-10.318-6.539

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Regional Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity at 52 Weeks

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of regional aortic pulse wave velocity. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionmeters per second (m/s) (Least Squares Mean)
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)-2.086
Olmesartan-1.085

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Proximal Descending Aorta Distensibility at 52 Weeks

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained at baseline prior to randomization, at week 52 for the assessment of local aortic distensibility. Proximal descending aorta distensibility was one of the 3 components for measuring local arota distensibility. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Intervention10^(-3) x mmHg^(-1) (Least Squares Mean)
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)0.510
Olmesartan0.547

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Carotid-femoral Pulse Wave Velocity at 52 Weeks

For pulse wave velocity calculation, the pressure waveform at the femoral site (using a partially inflated custom blood pressure cuff) and the carotid site (using hand -held applanation tonometry) were measured simultaneously. Pulse wave analysis was performed on the central aortic pressure waveform as derived from the brachial pressure waveform recorded in a partially-inflated blood pressure cuff around the upper arm. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionmeters per second (m/s) (Least Squares Mean)
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)-0.428
Olmesartan-0.434

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Augmentation Pressure at 52 Weeks

Augmentation pressure is the added pressure during systole due to wave reflection. (NCT01870739)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696)-2.443
Olmesartan-1.437

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (maSBP)

Twenty-four hour mean ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) will be performed at baseline and at end of study (week 8). The first 24-hour ABPM will be performed beginning at 24 hours prior to baseline visit and the second will be performed 24 hours prior to week 8 visit. (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 200 mg-4.26
Olmesartan 20 mg-1.04

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (maDBP)

Twenty-four hour mean ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) will be performed at baseline and at end of study (week 8). The 24-hour ABPM measurements are performed beginning 24 hours prior to baseline and week 8 visits. (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 200 mg-2.27
Olmesartan 20 mg-0.35

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP)

Sitting blood pressure (BP) measurement will be taken at every visit from screening through end of study. For each participant at each visit, four separate sitting BP measurements will be obtained (with a full two minute interval between measurements) and averaged to obtain the mean (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 200 mg-7.52
Olmesartan 20 mg-4.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP)

Sitting blood pressure (BP) measurement will be taken at every visit from screening through end of study. For each participant at each visit, four separate sitting BP measurements will be obtained (with a full two minute interval between measurements) and averaged to obtain the mean (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 200 mg-14.21
Olmesartan 20 mg-10.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Office Pulse Pressure

Mean sitting pulse pressure (msPP) will be calculated at screening through end of study at every visit. Mean sitting pulse pressure is calculated as msSBP-msDBP. (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
LCZ696 200 mg-6.67
Olmesartan 20 mg-5.54

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Control

Successful mean sitting diastolic blood pressure control is defined as msDBP <90 mmHg (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
LCZ696 200 mg133
Olmesartan 20 mg112

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) Response

Successful mean sitting diastolic blood pressure response is defined as msDBP <90 mmHg or a reduction ≥10 mmHg from baseline. (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
LCZ696 200 mg137
Olmesartan 20 mg115

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Response

Successful mean sitting systolic blood pressure response is defined as msSBP <140 mmHg or a reduction ≥ 20 mmHg from baseline. (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: baseline, 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
LCZ696 200 mg90
Olmesartan 20 mg65

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Successful Overall Blood Pressure Control

Successful overall blood pressure control is defined as both msSBP/msDBP <140/90 mmHg (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
LCZ696 200 mg76
Olmesartan 20 mg52

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Total Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Death

Number of patients with total adverse events, serious adverse events and death were reported. (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

,
InterventionNumber of participants (Number)
Adverse events (serious and non-serious)Serious Adverse EventsDeaths
LCZ696 200 mg4400
Olmesartan 20 mg4120

[back to top]

Number of Patients Achieving Successful Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) Control

Successful mean sitting systolic blood pressure control is defined as msSBP <140 mmHg (NCT01876368)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
LCZ696 200 mg84
Olmesartan 20 mg58

[back to top]