Page last updated: 2024-12-05

fentanyl

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Fentanyl: A potent narcotic analgesic, abuse of which leads to habituation or addiction. It is primarily a mu-opioid agonist. Fentanyl is also used as an adjunct to general anesthetics, and as an anesthetic for induction and maintenance. (From Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 30th ed, p1078) [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

fentanyl : A monocarboxylic acid amide resulting from the formal condensation of the aryl amino group of N-phenyl-1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-amine with propanoic acid. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID3345
CHEMBL ID596
CHEBI ID119915
SCHEMBL ID8804
MeSH IDM0008338

Synonyms (141)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0555
gtpl1626
propanamide, n-phenyl-n-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-
propionanilide, n-(1-phenethyl-4-piperidyl)-
n-phenyl-n-[1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl]propanamide
durogesic
sublimaze
ionsys
einecs 207-113-6
brn 0494484
duragesic
propanamide, n-phenyl-n-(1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl)-
hsdb 3329
fentanylum
sentonil
fentanila
r 4263
fentanila [inn-spanish]
fentanil [dcit]
fentanylum [inn-latin]
fentanest
fentora
PDSP1_000860
PDSP2_000846
OPREA1_207148
fentanyl
n-phenethyl-4-(n-propionylanilino)piperidine
1-phenethyl-4-(n-phenylpropionamido)piperidine
phentanyl
1-phenethyl-4-n-propionylanilinopiperidine
fentanil
DB00813
n-(1-phenethyl-4-piperidyl)propionanilide
n-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-n-phenylpropionamide
n-(1-phenethyl-4-piperidinyl)-n-phenylpropionamide
fentanyl cii
n-(1-phenethyl-piperidin-4-yl)-n-phenyl-propionamide
n-phenyl-n-(1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl)propanamide
437-38-7
D00320
subsys (tn)
duragesic (tn)
fentanyl (jan/usp/inn)
OPREA1_152073
NCGC00168252-01
R4263 ,
CHEBI:119915 ,
L001275
durogesic d-trans
ad 923
en-3267
ids-nf-001
ad-923
abstral-
fendrop
en3267
sublimase
CHEMBL596 ,
n02ab03
recuvyra
fentanyl-100
fentanyl-50
duragesic-50
fentanyl-25
fentanyl-12
n-(1-phenethyl-piperidin-4-yl)-n-phenyl-propionamide(fentanyl)
duragesic-25
duragesic-100
duragesic-75
duragesic-12
bdbm50008984
fentanyl-75
fentanyl-hcl
n-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-n-phenylpropanamide
dtxsid9023049 ,
dtxcid103049
tox21_112611
cas-437-38-7
5-22-08-00049 (beilstein handbook reference)
pecfent
subsys
uf599785jz ,
durotep mt
unii-uf599785jz
fentanyl [usan:usp:inn:ban]
fentanyl transdermal system
jns020qd
matrifen
EPITOPE ID:153507
fentanyl [ep impurity]
tranq component fentanyl
fentanyl [green book]
fentanyl [orange book]
fentanyl [ema epar veterinary]
fentanyl [inn]
fentanyl [ema epar]
fentanyl [vandf]
fentanyl cii [usp-rs]
fentanyl [ep monograph]
propanamide, n-phenyl-n-(1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl)
fentanyl [who-dd]
fentanyl [jan]
fentanyl [mart.]
fentanyl [usan]
fentanyl [mi]
fentanyl [usp monograph]
fentanyl [hsdb]
n-(1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl)-n-phenylpropanamide
SCHEMBL8804
1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-(n-propananilido)piperidine
n-(1-phenylethyl-4-piperidinyl)propionanilide
n-phenyl-n-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl]propanamide #
fentanyl 0.1 mg/ml in methanol
fentanyl 1.0 mg/ml in methanol
7v7 ,
CS-7211
HY-U00158
Q407541
fentanyl-62
fentanyl-37
fentanyl-87
fentanyl (mart.)
n-phenyl-n-(1-
fentanila (inn-spanish)
fentanyl (ema epar veterinary)
fentanyl system
fentanilo
n-phenyl-n-(1-(2-phenylethyl)piperidin-4-yl)propanamide
fentanyl transdermal
fentanylum (inn-latin)
fentanyl (usan:usp:inn:ban)
n01ah01
fentanyl (usp monograph)
fentanylum (latin)
duragesic-37
fentanyl (ep impurity)
n-phenyl-n-
fentanyl cii (usp-rs)
fentanyl (ep monograph)
fentanyl, 0.1mg/ml in methanol
fentanyl, 1mg/ml in methanol

Research Excerpts

Overview

Fentanyl is an anesthetic/analgesic commonly used in surgical and recovery settings. Fentanyl is a highly lipophilic mu opioid receptor agonist, increasingly found in heroin and other drug supplies.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Fentanyl is an opioid commonly used to prevent and treat severe pain in neonates; however, its use is off label and mostly based on bodyweight. "( Pre- and Postnatal Maturation are Important for Fentanyl Exposure in Preterm and Term Newborns: A Pooled Population Pharmacokinetic Study.
Allegaert, K; Fellman, V; Flint, RB; Knibbe, CAJ; Simons, SHP; Völler, S; Wu, Y, 2022
)
2.42
"Fentanyl is an anesthetic/analgesic commonly used in surgical and recovery settings. "( Effect of CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 Genetic Variants on Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics in a Pediatric Population.
Breeyear, JH; Choi, L; Edwards, TL; Kannankeril, PJ; Van Driest, SL; Williams, ML, 2022
)
2.42
"Fentanyl is a fully synthetic opioid with analgesic and anesthetic properties. "( Unique Pharmacology, Brain Dysfunction, and Therapeutic Advancements for Fentanyl Misuse and Abuse.
Cao, L; Han, Y; Lu, L; Shi, J; Yan, W; Yuan, K, 2022
)
2.4
"Fentanyl is an analgesic used against pancreatitis-related pain, while whether it ameliorates severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) has yet to be checked. "( Fentanyl alleviates intestinal mucosal barrier damage in rats with severe acute pancreatitis by inhibiting the MMP-9/FasL/Fas pathway.
Ding, W; Lao, Y; Li, X; Mo, Y; Wang, B; Zhang, X; Zheng, Y, 2022
)
3.61
"Fentanyl is an opioid receptor agonist and a commonly used sedative."( Efficacy of Analgesic Propofol/Esketamine and Propofol/Fentanyl for Painless Induced Abortion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jin, S; Xin, N; Yan, W, 2022
)
1.69
"Fentanyl is an opioid analgesic and is widely used in ovarian cancer patients for pain management. "( Fentanyl activates ovarian cancer and alleviates chemotherapy-induced toxicity via opioid receptor-dependent activation of EGFR.
Bao, L; Xiao, K; Zheng, Q, 2022
)
3.61
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid analgesic with high bioavailability. "( High-Precision Automatic Identification of Fentanyl-Related Drugs by Terahertz Spectroscopy with Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Spectral Similarity Mapping.
Lin, L; Nie, P; Qu, F; Xia, Z, 2022
)
2.43
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid commonly used in clinical practice, and behavioral changes resulting from fentanyl addiction have rarely been studied with zebrafish models."( Fentanyl Induces Novel Conditioned Place Preference in Adult Zebrafish, Disrupts Neurotransmitter Homeostasis, and Triggers Behavioral Changes.
Chian, S; Fu, L; Li, K; Liu, M; Wang, A; Wang, B; Wang, J; Wu, Y; Yao, W, 2022
)
2.89
"Fentanyl is a highly lipophilic mu opioid receptor agonist, increasingly found in heroin and other drug supplies, that is contributing to marked increases in opioid-related overdose and may be complicating treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). "( Fentanyl withdrawal: Understanding symptom severity and exploring the role of body mass index on withdrawal symptoms and clearance.
Choi, CJ; Comer, S; Jones, J; Luba, R, 2023
)
3.8
"Fentanyl is a powerful synthetic opioid used to treat severe pain. "( Electrochemical biosensor for quantitative determination of fentanyl based on immobilized cytochrome c on multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified screen-printed carbon electrodes.
Alvarado-Gámez, AL; Arcos-Martínez, MJ; Barquero-Quirós, M; González-Hernández, J; Moya-Alvarado, G; Urcuyo, R, 2022
)
2.41
"Fentanyl is an analgesic that is frequently prescribed, which resulted in non-intentional as well as intentional misuse and deaths. "( Case report on postmortem fentanyl measurement after overdose with more than 67 fentanyl patches.
Bethlehem, C; Croes, EA; Peeters, LEJ; Tan, GE; Vleut, IT, 2022
)
2.46
"Fentanyl test strips are a novel drug checking tool that can be used by people who use drugs to detect the presence of fentanyl in drug products."( Differences in drug use behaviors that impact overdose risk among individuals who do and do not use fentanyl test strips for drug checking.
Baltes, A; Brown, R; Malicki, J; Salisbury-Afshar, E; Tilhou, AS; Zaborek, J, 2023
)
1.85
"Fentanyl is a pressing concern in the current drug supply. "( Trends in Fentanyl Content on Reddit Substance Use Forums, 2013-2021.
Arya, S; Bunting, AM; Gu, Y; Krawczyk, N; Lippincott, T; Meacham, MC; Nagappala, S, 2023
)
2.76
"Fentanyl analogs are a class of designer drugs that are particularly challenging to unambiguously identify due to the mass spectral and retention time similarities of unique compounds. "( On the challenge of unambiguous identification of fentanyl analogs: Exploring measurement diversity using standard reference mass spectral libraries.
Erisman, EP; Kearsley, AJ; Liang, Y; Moorthy, AS; Sisco, E; Wallace, WE, 2023
)
2.61
"Fentanyl is a potent analgesic with a rapid onset and short half-life that make it a useful treatment for pain and a lethal drug of abuse. "( Continuous fentanyl administration and spontaneous withdrawal decreases home cage wheel running in rats with and without hindpaw inflammation.
Hilgendorf, TN; Kandasamy, R; Morgan, MM, 2023
)
2.74
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that was approved by the FDA in the late 1960s. "( Advances in fentanyl testing.
Uljon, S, 2023
)
2.73
"Fentanyl (FEN) is a potent opioid analgesic used for pain management. "( Enhancing fentanyl antinociception and preventing tolerance with α-2 adrenoceptor agonists in rats.
Kara, AY; Koyu, A; Simsek, F; Yildiz Pehlivan, D, 2024
)
3.29
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid used for managing chronic pain. "( Energetics of high temperature degradation of fentanyl into primary and secondary products.
Monteith, HL; Moorman, MW; Poudel, B; Rempe, SB; Sammon, JP; Vanegas, JM; Whiting, JJ, 2023
)
2.61
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid used in pain management with a potency 50-100 times that of morphine. "( Quantification of Fentanyl and Norfentanyl in Whole Blood Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Clinton Frazee, C; Garg, U; Shell, S, 2024
)
3.22
"Fentanyl is an opioid we can use after surgery, and it can decrease pain post SAH."( Effectiveness of Low-Dose Intravenous Fentanyl for Postoperative Headache Management After Neck Clipping of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.
Ikeda, G; Ishikawa, E; Matsumaru, Y; Matsumura, A; Nakai, Y; Terakado, T; Uemura, K, 2020
)
1.55
"Fentanyl is a powerful opioid anesthetic and analgesic, the use of which has caused an increasing public health threat in the United States and elsewhere. "( The rising crisis of illicit fentanyl use, overdose, and potential therapeutic strategies.
Han, Y; Khan, MZ; Lu, L; Yan, W; Yuan, K; Zheng, Y, 2019
)
2.25
"Fentanyl is an opioid analgesic, which is routinely used in general surgery to suppress the sensation of pain and as the analgesic component in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. "( Modulation of the
de Leeuw, NH; Faulkner, C; Plant, DF, 2019
)
1.96
"Fentanyl is a pain reliever stronger and deadlier than heroin. "( A glassy carbon electrode modified with carbon nanoonions for electrochemical determination of fentanyl.
Ahmadi, F; Keihan, AH; Naghian, E; Plonska-Brzezinska, ME; Rahimi-Nasrabadi, M; Shahdost-Fard, F; Sohouli, E, 2020
)
2.22
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that has been approved by the FDA as a general anesthetic because of its rapid onset and high potency. "( The influence of chemical modifications on the fragmentation behavior of fentanyl and fentanyl-related compounds in electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.
Davidson, JT; Jackson, GP; Sasiene, ZJ, 2020
)
2.23
"Fentanyl is a highly potent mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonist and plays a significant role in the current opioid epidemic; fentanyl and its analogs (fentalogs) are increasingly becoming one of the biggest dangers in the opioid crisis."( In vitro pharmacology of fentanyl analogs at the human mu opioid receptor and their spectroscopic analysis.
Anand, JP; Bassman, JR; Hassanien, SH; Iula, DM; Perrien Naccarato, CM; Traynor, JR; Twarozynski, JJ, 2020
)
1.58
"Fentanyl is a common sedative/analgesic used for intrathecal chemotherapy injection in children with acute leukemia. "( Fentanyl inhibits acute myeloid leukemia differentiated cells and committed progenitors via opioid receptor-independent suppression of Ras and STAT5 pathways.
Dai, S; Pang, Q; Zhang, P; Zhang, X; Zheng, X, 2021
)
3.51
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid that has contributed to increasing overdose deaths in the United States in recent years. "( One year of methadone maintenance treatment in a fentanyl endemic area: Safety, repeated exposure, retention, and remission.
Carroll, JJ; Green, TC; Rich, JD; Stone, AC, 2020
)
2.26
"Fentanyl is a commonly used off-label medication for pain control and sedation in preterm infants. "( Effect of Fentanyl Boluses on Cerebral Oxygenation and Hemodynamics in Preterm Infants: A Prospective Observational Study.
Babadagli, ME; dePalma, A; El-Naggar, W; Hatfield, T; McCord, H; McMillan, DD; Mitra, S; Schmölzer, GM, 2020
)
2.4
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid used to alleviate severe and chronic pain, as well as an adjunct to general or local anesthesia. "( Emerging Role of Fentanyl in Antiplatelet Therapy.
Boncler, M; Kuczyńska, K, 2020
)
2.34
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid associated with illicit drug use and overdose deaths. "( Comparison of Two Commercially Available Fentanyl Screening Immunoassays for Clinical Use.
Budelier, MM; Farnsworth, CW; Franks, CE; Jannetto, PJ; Logsdon, N; Roper, SM; Scott, MG, 2020
)
2.27
"Fentanyl is a typical opioid that is used in surgical anesthesia. "( Rapid quantitative determination of fentanyl in human urine and serum using a gold-based immunochromatographic strip sensor.
Hao, C; Kuang, H; Lei, X; Liu, L; Xu, C; Xu, L; Xu, X, 2020
)
2.28
"Fentanyl is a full synthetic opioid acting as a strong µ-opioids receptor agonist. "( Fentanyl analogues potency: what should be known.
Del Rio, A; Di Trana, A,
)
3.02
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid analgesic, which for decades has been used routinely in surgical and therapeutic applications. "( In silico studies of the interactions between propofol and fentanyl using Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics.
de Leeuw, NH; Faulkner, C, 2022
)
2.41
"Fentanyl is a key therapeutic, used in anaesthesia and pain management. "( The anomalous pharmacology of fentanyl.
Alhosan, N; Cavallo, D; Henderson, G; Kelly, E; Ramos-Gonzalez, N; Sutcliffe, K, 2023
)
2.64
"Fentanyl is a high potency opioid that has become an increasingly large proportion of the illicit drug supply. "( Fentanyl contaminated "M30" pill overdoses in pediatric patients.
Joynt, PY; Wang, GS, 2021
)
3.51
"Fentanyls abuse is a persistent international concern. "( Identification and monitoring of fentanyls-related substances in east China sewage water samples by LC-MS for drug enforcement.
Di, B; Hang, TJ; Lu, YT; Song, M; Sun, FM; Wang, Y; Wu, DF; Xu, H; Xu, L, 2021
)
2.35
"Fentanyl is an opioid analgesic used to treat obstetrical pain in parturient women through epidural or intravenous route, and unfortunately can also be abused by pregnant women. "( Predicting Maternal-Fetal Disposition of Fentanyl Following Intravenous and Epidural Administration Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.
Isoherranen, N; Shen, DD; Shum, S, 2021
)
2.33
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid with analgesic potency 75-100 times higher than that of morphine, and its analgesic effect is used for pain treatment, mostly in cancer patients. "( Fentanyl use disorder characterized by unprescribed use of transdermal patches: a case report.
Guliyev, C; Ögel, K; Tuna, ZO,
)
3.02
"Fentanyl is a synthetic, highly selective opioid with many desirable physicochemical properties, including a high lipophilicity and predictable pharmacokinetics. "( Fentanyl Formulations in the Management of Pain: An Update.
Schug, SA; Ting, S, 2017
)
3.34
"Fentanyl (FEN) is a potent, synthetic narcotic used as an anaesthetic and a pain reliever, but also illegally manufactured. "( Fentanyl novel derivative-related deaths.
Centola, C; Giorgetti, A; Giorgetti, R, 2017
)
3.34
"Fentanyl ITS is a preprogrammed, needle-free PCA system used for the management of acute pain in postoperative patients."( Meta-Analysis of the Ease of Care From a Patients' Perspective Comparing Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System Versus Morphine Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Postoperative Pain Management.
Danesi, H; Ding, L; Jones, JB; Lindley, P, 2017
)
1.41
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid used extensively in humans for general anesthesia and analgesia. "( Fentanyl-Induced Brain Hypoxia Triggers Brain Hyperglycemia and Biphasic Changes in Brain Temperature.
Cameron-Burr, KT; Kiyatkin, EA; Shaham, Y; Solis, E, 2018
)
3.37
"Fentanyl is an opioid agonist used for acute and chronic pain management. "( LC-MS determination of fentanyl in human serum and application to a fentanyl transdermal delivery pharmacokinetic study.
Abdallah, IA; Hammell, DC; Hassan, HE; Shin, SH; Stinchcomb, AL; Yu, M, 2017
)
2.21
"Fentanyl is a highly potent synthetic opioid with rapid onset and significantly higher risk of overdose compared with other opioids."( Intravenous fentanyl use among people who inject drugs in Australia.
Geddes, L; Iversen, J; Maher, L; Memedovic, S, 2018
)
1.58
"Fentanyl is a potent, synthetic opioid at the centre of an international health crisis that has seen thousands of fatal overdoses. "( Paper spray mass spectrometry for the direct, semi-quantitative measurement of fentanyl and norfentanyl in complex matrices.
Gill, CG; Hessels, AJ; Krogh, ET; Palaty, J; Vandergrift, GW, 2018
)
2.15
"Fentanyl is a rapid-acting, short duration opioid analgesic agent. "( P-Glycoprotein on Blood-Brain Barrier Plays a Vital Role in Fentanyl Brain Exposure and Respiratory Toxicity in Rats.
Li, H; Yang, H; Yu, C; Yuan, M; Zhuang, X, 2018
)
2.17
"Fentanyl is an opioid commonly prescribed for cancer pain. "( Analgesic effects of systemic fentanyl on cancer pain are mediated by not only central but also peripheral opioid receptors in mice.
Andoh, T; Kuraishi, Y; Saiki, I; Shinohara, A, 2018
)
2.21
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid used as a narcotic analgesic supplement in general and regional anesthesia as well as in management of persistent, severe chronic pain. "( Abuse of fentanyl: An emerging problem to face.
Grzonkowski, P; Kacprzak, Ł; Kuczyńska, K; Zawilska, JB, 2018
)
2.34
"Fentanyl is a widely used drug in the management of pain. "( Sensitive Determination of Fentanyl in Low-Volume Serum Samples by LC-MS/MS.
Fisher, J; Kandimalla, KK; Swaminathan, SK, 2018
)
2.22
"Fentanyl is a common opiate primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 subtypes."( Identification of Cytochrome P450 Polymorphisms in Burn Patients and Impact on Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics: A Pilot Study.
Grimsrud, KN; Ivanova, X; Palmieri, TL; Sherwin, CM; Tran, NK, 2019
)
1.46
"Fentanyl is an extremely potent synthetic opioid that has been increasingly used to adulterate heroin, cocaine, and counterfeit prescription pills, leading to an increase in opioid-induced fatal overdoses in the United States, Canada, and Europe. "( A Fentanyl Vaccine Alters Fentanyl Distribution and Protects against Fentanyl-Induced Effects in Mice and Rats.
Baruffaldi, F; Harmon, TM; Le Naour, M; Pentel, PR; Peterson, SJ; Pravetoni, M; Raleigh, MD; Vigliaturo, JR, 2019
)
2.68
"Fentanyl is an important opioid for pain management, but also has exceptional potential for misuse. "( Trends in the medical supply of fentanyl and fentanyl analogues: United States, 2006 to 2017.
Chung, DY; Collins, LK; McCall, KL; Nichols, SD; Pande, LJ; Piper, BJ, 2019
)
2.24
"Fentanyl is a potent analgesic that accounts for an increasing number of overdose deaths in the United States. "( Prolonged therapy with the anticonvulsant carbamazepine leads to increased plasma clearance of fentanyl.
Akeju, O; Eskandar, E; Greenblatt, DJ; Hossain, MA; Ma, Z; Martyn, JAJ; Mirzakhani, H; Nozari, A; Wang, Q, 2019
)
2.18
"Fentanyl is an opioid analgesic that is available as injection and transdermal patch products for the management of acute and chronic pain."( Evaluation of soluble fentanyl microneedles for loco-regional anti-nociceptive activity.
Ajjarapu, SS; Bae, J; Dhawan, T; Maurya, A; Murthy, SN; Rangappa, S, 2019
)
1.55
"Fentanyl is a lipophilic opioid commonly proposed for intranasal use among pediatric patients, but no studies have been conducted yet about intranasal use of other available opioids for management of pediatric cancer pain."( Intranasal therapy with opioids for children and adolescents with cancer: results from clinical studies.
Attinà, G; Capozza, MA; Mastrangelo, S; Maurizi, P; Ruggiero, A; Triarico, S, 2019
)
1.24
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid with a variety of possible applications. "( Fatal misuse of transdermal fentanyl patches.
Doberentz, E; Geile, J; Kraemer, M; Maas, A; Madea, B, 2019
)
2.25
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid commonly used as an anesthetic and also increasingly popular as a sedative agent in neonates. "( A predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of fentanyl for analgesia/sedation in neonates based on a semi-physiologic approach.
Calvo, R; Encinas, E; Lukas, JC; Rodriguez, M; Suarez, E; Vozmediano, V, 2013
)
2.08
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid that has been proven to provide effective treatment for breakthrough cancer pain. "( Fentanyl for the relief of refractory breathlessness: a systematic review.
Gaertner, J; Köskeroglu, P; Simon, ST; Voltz, R, 2013
)
3.28
"Remifentanyl is a better choice of opioid in preventing pain on rocuronium injection using venous occlusion technique than fentanyl, with efficacy comparable to Xylocaine."( Comparison of three methods of preventing rocuronium induced pain on injection using venous occlusion technique: a randomized prospective double blind controlled study.
Abu-Halaweh, NS; Abu-Halaweh, SA; Al-Hussami, MO; Al-Mustafa, M; Aloweidi, AK; Atyat, BS; Qudaisat, IY, 2013
)
0.95
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid agonist used for pain control. "( An examination of the postmortem redistribution of fentanyl and interlaboratory variability.
Krinsky, CS; Lathrop, SL; Zumwalt, R, 2014
)
2.1
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is very important in anesthetic practice because of its relatively short time to peak analgesic effect and the rapid termination of action after small bolus doses. "( Clinical pharmacology of fentanyl in preterm infants. A review.
Pacifici, GM, 2015
)
2.16
"1.Fentanyl is a highly lipophilic opioid commonly used to treat cancer pain. "( Protein binding of fentanyl and its metabolite nor-fentanyl in human plasma, albumin and α-1 acid glycoprotein.
Bista, SR; Hardy, J; Haywood, A; Lobb, M; Norris, R; Tapuni, A, 2015
)
1.47
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid. "( [Fentanyl tea].
Darling, SS; Mærkedahl, R, 2014
)
2.76
"Fentanyl is a synthetic narcotic anesthetic ∼80-100 times more potent than morphine. "( Analysis of fentanyl in urine by DLLME-GC-MS.
Gardner, MA; Jenkins, WW; Owens, JE; Sampsel, S, 2015
)
2.24
"Fentanyl appears to be a suitable alternative to pethidine when providing parenteral pain relief to labouring women."( A comparison of fentanyl with pethidine for pain relief during childbirth: a randomised controlled trial.
Belan, I; Cyna, AM; Fleet, J; Jones, MJ; Ullah, S, 2015
)
1.48
"Butyrfentanyl is a potent short-acting opioid and a fentanyl analog with uncertain clinical effects. "( Butyrfentanyl overdose resulting in diffuse alveolar hemorrhage.
Cole, JB; Dunbar, JF; McIntire, SA; Regelmann, WE; Slusher, TM, 2015
)
1.44
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid analgesic used in the treatment of pain. "( The Fentanyl Patch Boil-Up - A Novel Method of Opioid Abuse.
Reynolds, TM; Schauer, CK; Shand, JA, 2015
)
2.42
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid analgesic historically used as a pain reliever and an anaesthetic. "( Fentanyls: Are we missing the signs? Highly potent and on the rise in Europe.
Denissov, G; Giraudon, I; Griffiths, P; Mounteney, J, 2015
)
3.3
"Fentanyl appears to be a safe and effective alternative to morphine for the management of chest pain in the prehospital setting."( Comparison of Fentanyl and Morphine in the Prehospital Treatment of Ischemic Type Chest Pain.
Ariano, RE; Grierson, RA; Weldon, ER, 2016
)
1.52
"Fentanyl is an addictive prescription opioid that is over 80 times more potent than morphine. "( Combatting Synthetic Designer Opioids: A Conjugate Vaccine Ablates Lethal Doses of Fentanyl Class Drugs.
Bremer, PT; Collins, KC; Janda, KD; Kimishima, A; Schlosburg, JE; Zhou, B, 2016
)
2.1
"Fentanyl is a μ-opioid agonist that often is used as the analgesic component for balanced anesthesia in both human and veterinary patients. "( Pharmacokinetics of 2 Formulations of Transdermal Fentanyl in Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca fascicularis).
Bailey, EJ; Carlson, AM; Fetterer, DP; Kelly, R; Rico, PJ, 2016
)
2.13
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid 50-100 times more potent than morphine (2).* Multiple states have reported increases in fentanyl-involved overdose (poisoning) deaths (fentanyl deaths) (2)."( Fentanyl Law Enforcement Submissions and Increases in Synthetic Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - 27 States, 2013-2014.
Gladden, RM; Martinez, P; Seth, P, 2016
)
2.6
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid 50-100 times more potent than morphine and approved for the management of surgical/postoperative pain, severe chronic pain, and breakthrough cancer pain.* DEA's National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) collects drug identification results from drug cases analyzed by federal, state, and local forensic laboratories throughout the United States.(†) In 2014, 80% of fentanyl submissions (i.e., drug products obtained by law enforcement that tested positive for fentanyl) in NFLIS were identified from 10 states, including Florida and Ohio (2), and seven of these 10 states reported sharp increases in fentanyl-related overdose deaths (fentanyl deaths) (3)."( Increases in Fentanyl-Related Overdose Deaths - Florida and Ohio, 2013-2015.
DeFiore-Hyrmer, J; Delcher, C; DiOrio, M; Garcia-Williams, A; Gladden, RM; Goldberger, BA; Halpin, J; McCarty, CL; Peterson, AB; Spies, E; Wang, Y; Zibbell, J, 2016
)
1.52
"Fentanyl is a strong opioid that is available for various administration routes, and which is widely used to treat cancer-related pain. "( A review of factors explaining variability in fentanyl pharmacokinetics; focus on implications for cancer patients.
Koolen, SL; Kuip, EJ; Mathijssen, RH; van der Rijt, CC; Zandvliet, ML, 2017
)
2.16
"Butyrfentanyl is a new fentanyl derivative whose potency ratio was found to be seven compared to morphine and 0.13 compared to fentanyl."( Studies on the metabolism of the fentanyl-derived designer drug butyrfentanyl in human in vitro liver preparations and authentic human samples using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS).
Kraemer, T; Staeheli, SN; Steuer, AE; Williner, E, 2017
)
1.19
"Fentanyl is a strong µ-opioid analgesic which attenuates the stimulation of surgical invasion and tracheal intubation. "( Swallowing action immediately before intravenous fentanyl at induction of anesthesia prevents fentanyl-induced coughing: a randomized controlled study.
Fujimura, N; Sako, S; Tokunaga, S; Tsukamoto, M; Yokoyama, T; Yoshino, J, 2017
)
2.15
"Fentanyl is a frequently used concomitant drug. "( High Concomitant Misuse of Fentanyl in Subjects on Opioid Maintenance Treatment.
Adam, R; Al-Iassin, J; Canolli, M; Koller, G; Krause, D; Martin, G; Musselmann, R; Plörer, D; Pogarell, O; Schäfer, F; Walcher, S; Winter, C, 2017
)
2.19
"Fentanyl is an extremely potent narcotic analgesic that is becoming more popular as a drug of abuse. "( Unusual fentanyl patch administration.
Pestaner, JP; Thomas, S; Winecker, R, 2008
)
2.22
"Fentanyl is a commonly used supplement that may contribute to this, although it may also improve analgesia."( Omitting fentanyl reduces nausea and vomiting, without increasing pain, after sevoflurane for day surgery.
Bridgman, S; Smith, I; Walley, G, 2008
)
1.48
"Fentanyl patch is an alternative for children who cannot tolerate morphine. "( Fentanyl patch for stable chronic pain in children: new indication. Used fentanyl patches should be handled with care.
, 2008
)
3.23
"Fentanyl is a potent mu-opioid receptor agonist that is widely used for the treatment of chronic pain. "( Effects of fentanyl dose and exposure duration on the affective and somatic signs of fentanyl withdrawal in rats.
Bruijnzeel, AW; Derendorf, H; Gold, MS; Liu, J; Pan, H, 2008
)
2.18
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic narcotic analgesic administered in the form of a transdermal patch for the management of chronic pain."( Determination of fentanyl in biological and water samples using single-drop liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography.
Ebrahimzadeh, H; Gholizade, A; Kasraee, S; Sedighi, A; Yamini, Y, 2008
)
1.41
"Fentanyl is a frequently used and abused opioid analgesic and can cause internalization of mu opioid receptors (MORs). "( Bidirectional effects of fentanyl on dendritic spines and AMPA receptors depend upon the internalization of mu opioid receptors.
Higgins, P; Law, PY; Liao, D; Lin, H; Loh, HH, 2009
)
2.1
"Fentanyl is an opioid with high lipid solubility, suitable for intravenous, spinal, transmucosal and transdermal administration. "( Transdermal fentanyl in cachectic cancer patients.
Gergov, M; Haakana, S; Heiskanen, T; Kalso, E; Mätzke, S; Vuori, E, 2009
)
2.17
"Fentanyl is a commonly used analgesic and sedative for the burned in the operating theater as well as the burn care units. "( Comparative population pharmacokinetics of fentanyl using non-linear mixed effect modeling: burns vs. non-burns.
Han, TH; Kaneda, K, 2009
)
2.06
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid with short-acting analgesic activity after intravenous or subcutaneous administration. "( [Severe nonfatal poisoning after intravenous abuse of transdermal fentanyl--a case report].
Magdalan, J, 2009
)
2.03
"Fentanyl is a lipophilic, short-acting, synthetic opioid with a piperidine chemical structure. "( The role of fentanyl in cancer-related pain.
Prommer, E, 2009
)
2.17
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid analgesic that is increasingly becoming a choice drug of abuse. "( Potential biomarkers of smoked fentanyl utilizing pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Bell, SC; Callery, PS; Kraner, JC; Nishikawa, RK, 2009
)
2.08
"Fentanyl is a high-potency opioid that has many uses in the treatment of both acute and chronic pain. "( Transdermal fentanyl: pharmacology and toxicology.
Nelson, L; Schwaner, R, 2009
)
2.17
"Fentanyl is a potent analgesic drug in relieving chronic pain in patients. "( Development of a liquid chromatography-isotope dilution mass spectrometry method for quantification of fentanyl in human plasma.
Gui, YZ; Jia, JY; Li, SJ; Liu, GY; Lu, C; Shi, XJ; Yu, C, 2010
)
2.02
"Fentanyl is a potent Schedule II narcotic analgesic recommended for use in the management of unremitting pain not controlled by morphine or other opiate/opioid drugs. "( Deaths with transdermal fentanyl patches.
Jumbelic, MI, 2010
)
2.11
"Fentanyl is an opioid initially developed for parenteral administration. "( Formulations of fentanyl for the management of pain.
Grape, S; Lauer, S; Schug, BS; Schug, SA, 2010
)
2.15
"Fentanyl is a short-acting analgesic causing less sedation and nausea in adults than pethidine."( Non-axial administration of fentanyl in childbirth: a review of the efficacy and safety of fentanyl for mother and neonate.
Belan, I; Fleet, J; Jones, M, 2011
)
1.38
"Fentanyl is a potent, short-acting synthetic opioid analgesic. "( Quantitation of fentanyl in blood and urine using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
Chronister, CW; Goldberger, BA; Merves, ML, 2010
)
2.15
"Fentanyl is an appropriate drug because of its fast onset and short duration of action."( [Nasal application of fentanyl citrate as symptom control against breathlessness in palliative care--overview and case report].
Sitte, T, 2009
)
1.39
"Fentanyl is an increasingly common drug of abuse. "( The prevalence of fentanyl in drug-related deaths in Philadelphia 2004-2006.
Curtis, JA; Drake, R; Mundy, L; Wingert, WE; Wong, SC, 2010
)
2.14
"Fentanyl is a short-acting synthetic opioid with spinal analgesic properties and dose-dependent side-effects. "( The effect of transdermal nitroglycerine on intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following gynaecological surgery.
Ahmed, F; Chawla, V; Garg, A; Khandelwal, M; Verma, AP, 2010
)
2.05
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid analgesic marketed for the treatment of stable intense chronic pain, particularly in the form of a transdermal patch. "( Fentanyl patches: preventable overdose.
, 2010
)
3.25
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid available therapeutically as an intravenous, transbucal, or transdermal preparation. "( Complications of oral exposure to fentanyl transdermal delivery system patches.
Jones, BE; Nelson, L; Prosser, JM, 2010
)
2.08
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid with excellent results in perioperative analgesia. "( [Does the use of fentanyl make Vater's ampulla cannulation difficult? A prospective and comparative study].
Adalid-Martínez, R; García Vázquez, A; Güitrón-Cantú, A; Gutiérrez-Bermúdez, JA; Segura-López, FK, 2010
)
2.14
"Fentanyl is an extremely potent synthetic opioid that is widely used for chronic pain treatment; it is highly addictive and prone to abuse. "( Development of a homogeneous immunoassay for the detection of fentanyl in urine.
Barhate, R; Coulter, C; Huynh, K; Moore, C; Rodrigues, W; Soares, J; Vincent, M; Wang, G, 2011
)
2.05
"Fentanyl is a powerful opioid used for the induction of anesthesia as well as for the management of severe pain. "( Fentanyl in postmortem forensic toxicology.
Palmer, RB, 2010
)
3.25
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid with a short duration of action. "( Fentanyl sublingual: in breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adults with cancer.
Chwieduk, CM; McKeage, K, 2010
)
3.25
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid used for the management of chronic pain. "( Bioequivalence and safety of a novel fentanyl transdermal matrix system compared with a transdermal reservoir system.
Adams, HD; Ariyawansa, J; Moore, KT; Natarajan, J; Richards, HM,
)
1.85
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid with large abuse potential. "( Whole fentanyl patch ingestion: a multi-center case series.
Brooks, DE; Duback-Morris, LF; Feuchter, AC; Katz, KD; Krenzelok, EP; Mrvos, R, 2012
)
2.3
"Fentanyl is a widely used opioid receptor agonist for analgesia."( RNA interference targeting mu-opioid receptors reverses the inhibition of fentanyl on glucose-evoked insulin release of rat islets.
Liu, S; Lu, Y; Ma, L; Qian, TL; Wang, XH; Zhang, L, 2010
)
1.31
"Fentanyl is a potent mu opioid receptor agonist that was discovered to identify an improved human health analgesic over morphine, an opioid frequently associated with histamine-release, bradycardia, hyper- or hypotension, and prolonged postoperative respiratory depression. "( The history and pharmacology of fentanyl: relevance to a novel, long-acting transdermal fentanyl solution newly approved for use in dogs.
Clark, TP; Kukanich, B, 2012
)
2.11
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid characterized by rapid absorption and start of the analgesic effects."( Optimal management of breakthrough cancer pain (BCP).
Antón, A; Casas, A; Cruz, JJ; Escobar, Y; Gálvez, R; Juliá, J; López, R; Mañas, A; Margarit, C; Zaragozá, F, 2013
)
1.11
"1. Fentanyl is a micro -opioid analgesic that might disinhibit 5-HT neurons and thus increase 5-HT efflux. "( Effect of fentanyl on 5-HT efflux involves both opioid and 5-HT1A receptors.
Auerbach, SB; Karnik, M; Ma, Z; Tao, R, 2003
)
1.34
"Fentanyl is a synthetic, lipophilic opioid, more potent than morphine, and achieves peak effects after intravenous administration in 5 minutes."( Intravenous fentanyl for cancer pain: a "fast titration" protocol for the emergency room.
Martins, M; Soares, LG; Uchoa, R, 2003
)
1.42
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid that is increasingly being used in transdermal drug delivery systems. "( Dermal penetration of fentanyl: inter- and intraindividual variations.
Larsen, RH; Nielsen, F; Nielsen, JB; Sørensen, JA, 2003
)
2.08
"This fentanyl HCl PCTS is a preprogrammed, needle free, self-contained drug-delivery system that uses electrotransport technology (iontophoresis) to deliver 40 microg of fentanyl per on-demand dose."( The safety and efficacy of a fentanyl patient-controlled transdermal system for acute postoperative analgesia: a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial.
Chelly, JE; Grass, J; Houseman, TW; Minkowitz, H; Pue, A, 2004
)
1.07
"Fentanyl citrate is a synthetic opiate analgesic often used clinically for neonatal anesthesia. "( Fentanyl inhibits GABAergic neurotransmission to cardiac vagal neurons in the nucleus ambiguus.
Bouairi, E; Evans, C; Gold, A; Griffioen, KJ; Huang, ZG; Mendelowitz, D; Venkatesan, P; Wang, X, 2004
)
3.21
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that can be delivered through a transdermal therapeutic system (TTS). "( Transdermal fentanyl in HSCT patients: an open trial using transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of oral mucositis pain.
Carrassi, A; Deliliers, GL; Demarosi, F; Lodi, G; Sardella, A; Soligo, D; Volpe, AD, 2004
)
2.15
"TTS-fentanyl is a Transdermal Therapeutic System, which contains a rate-limiting membrane that provides constant release of fentanyl. "( Evaluation of safety and efficacy of transdermal therapeutic system-fentanyl in adult patients with gynecological cancer-related pain.
Cheewakriangkrai, C; Katanyoo, K; Lorvidhaya, V; Srisomboon, J; Suprapaphorn, P, 2004
)
1.12
"Fentanyl citrate is a potent opioid that can be delivered by the transdermal route in cats and dogs. "( Transdermal fentanyl patches in small animals.
Egger, CM; Hofmeister, EH,
)
1.95
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid used as a general anesthetic and analgetic. "( Deaths after intravenous misuse of transdermal fentanyl.
Bachs, L; Lilleng, PK; Mehlum, LI; Morild, I, 2004
)
2.02
"Fentanyl-propofol is an equally acceptable alternative; however, meperidine-propofol is associated with a high incidence of postoperative emesis."( Anesthetic techniques and postoperative emesis in pediatric strabismus surgery.
Chhabra, A; Gupta, S; Khandelwal, M; Pandey, R; Subramaniam, R,
)
0.85
"Fentanyl HCl PCTS is a compact, self-contained system that is easily applied to the upper outer arm or chest."( An iontophoretic, fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system for acute postoperative pain management.
Chelly, JE, 2005
)
1.38
"Fentanyl is an opioid drug widely used as a co-adjuvant in abdominal delivery, a fact that justifies its pharmacokinetic study under these conditions."( Pharmacokinetics and transplacental distribution of fentanyl in epidural anesthesia for normal pregnant women.
da Cunha, SP; de Barros Duarte, L; de Carvalho Cavalli, R; Duarte, G; Lanchote, VL; Moisés, EC, 2005
)
2.02
"The fentanyl HCl PATS is a needle-free, credit card-sized, preprogrammed system that is applied to the patient's upper outer arm or chest."( An iontophoretic fentanyl patient-activated analgesic delivery system for postoperative pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Atkinson, LE; Melson, T; Reynolds, L; Tait, S; Viscusi, ER, 2006
)
1.15
"Fentanyl is a highly potent and clinically widely used narcotic analgesic. "( Steric interactions and the activity of fentanyl analogs at the mu-opioid receptor.
Dosen-Micovic, L; Ivanovic, M; Micovic, V, 2006
)
2.04
"Fentanyl is a potent synthetic narcotic analgesic administered in the form of a transdermal patch for the management of chronic pain. "( LC-MS/MS analysis of fentanyl and norfentanyl in a fatality due to application of multiple Durogesic transdermal therapeutic systems.
Coopman, V; Cordonnier, J; Pien, K; Van Varenbergh, D, 2007
)
2.1
"Fentanyl is a potent mu-opioid receptor agonist that is widely used for the treatment of severe chronic pain. "( The effects of buprenorphine on fentanyl withdrawal in rats.
Booth, MM; Bruijnzeel, AW; Dennis, DM; Gold, MS; Isaac, S; Marcinkiewcz, C, 2007
)
2.07
"Fentanyl TTS is a promising option for chronic pain control in children."( Transdermal fentanyl in childhood and adolescence: a comprehensive literature review.
Anderson, B; Michel, E; Zernikow, B, 2007
)
1.44
"The fentanyl patch is a useful agent to control severe cancer pain because of excellent analgesic effect, less adverse effects and more convenience as well as itsundesirable characteristics when transition of patients to home-care is considered or oral administration should be avoided. "( [Usefulness of fentanyl patch (Durotep) in cancer patients when rotated from morphine preparations].
Akiyama, Y; Iseki, M; Ishii, K; Izawa, R; Miyazaki, T; Tani, Y; Yamaguchi, S, 2007
)
1.25
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid that is well absorbed via the oral mucosa. "( Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate versus placebo for painful dressing changes: a crossover trial.
Barker, L; Larsen, D; MacIntyre, PA; Margetts, L, 2007
)
2.12
"Fentanyl, however, is an extremely unusual cause of anaphylaxis."( Case report: fentanyl-associated intraoperative anaphylaxis with pulmonary edema.
Arnaut, K; Cummings, KC, 2007
)
1.43
"Fentanyl is a very potent synthetic narcotic analgesic. "( Use of single-drop microextraction for determination of fentanyl in water samples.
Dubey, DK; Ganesan, K; Gupta, PK; Manral, L, 2007
)
2.03
"Fentanyl is a potent, short-acting narcotic analgesic widely used as surgical anaesthetic. "( Suicide by fentanyl.
Definis-Gojanović, M; Sutlović, D, 2007
)
2.17
"Fentanyl misuse is a public health problem in Massachusetts."( Fatalities associated with fentanyl and co-administered cocaine or opiates.
Behonick, GS; Flomenbaum, MA; Hull, MJ; Juhascik, M; Mazur, F, 2007
)
1.36
"Fentanyl is a widely used opioid analgesic, which is extensively metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. "( Effect of voriconazole and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous fentanyl.
Laine, K; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Olkkola, KT; Saari, TI, 2008
)
2.02
"The fentanyl buccal tablet is a new sugar-free, easily-administered formulation that uses an effervescent drug delivery system to enhance the rate and extent of fentanyl absorption across the buccal mucosa."( Fentanyl buccal tablet: rapid relief from breakthrough pain.
Taylor, DR, 2007
)
2.26
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid used to treat intense chronic pain. "( Determination of fentanyl in sweat and hair of a patient using transdermal patches.
Ait-M-Bark, Z; Appenzeller, B; Lemmer, P; Schneider, S; Schummer, C; Wennig, R; Yegles, M, 2008
)
2.13
"Fentanyl is a spinal analgesic that could be a useful adjunct, and enhances the duration and quality of sensory block in adult surgical and obstetric population."( Dose-response study of intrathecal fentanyl added to bupivacaine in infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic surgery.
Batra, YK; Lokesh, VC; Panda, NB; Rajeev, S; Rao, KL, 2008
)
1.34
"Alfentanyl is a new narcotic analgesic with a rapid onset and very short duration of effect, and a potency about one third of that of fentanyl. "( Human volunteer studies of Alfentanyl (R39209), a new short-acting narcotic analgesic.
Kay, B; Pleuvry, B, 1980
)
1.27
"Sufentanyl is a new, potent, short-acting, fentanyl-like morphinomimetic. "( Skeletal muscle circulation during sufentanyl and morphine anesthesia in propranolol treated dogs.
Ahn, NC; Berthelsen, P; Eriksen, J; Rasmussen, JP, 1981
)
1.26
"Sufentanyl is a newly developed potent, short-acting fentanyl-like morphinomimetic. "( Peripheral circulation during sufentanyl and morphine anesthesia.
Ahn, NC; Berthelsen, P; Eriksen, J; Rasmussen, JP, 1980
)
1.27
"Fentanyl is a potent analgesic with a short time effect. "( [Comparative analgesic kinetics of fentanyl and droperidol-fentanyl association (author's transl)].
Bertrand, JC; Conil, JM; Cros, J; Gout, R; Lareng, L, 1981
)
1.98
"Fentanyl is a powerful morphinomimetic which decreases ventilatory frequency."( [The respiratory effects of small dose fentanyl associated with controlled hypotension during spontaneous ventilation in anesthetized man (author's transl)].
Bertrand, D; Hannhart, B; Laxenaire, MC, 1981
)
1.25
"Fentanyl is considered to be a short-acting narcotic analgesic but prolonged and recurrent ventilatory depression has been reported. "( Intravenous fentanyl kinetics.
Hug, CC; McClain, DA, 1980
)
2.08
"Fentanyl and midazolam is a combination that is effective and convenient to use because both agents are relatively short acting, have little cardiovascular depression and are easily reversible (with naloxone and flumazenil)."( Analgesia and sedation in interventional radiological procedures.
Hart, GK; Hennessy, OF; Hiew, CY; Thomson, KR, 1995
)
1.01
"TTS fentanyl was shown to be an effective, safe and simple method for long-term pain relief in cancer patients and presents an interesting novel option in the treatment of cancer pain."( Transdermal fentanyl in combination with initial intravenous dose titration by patient-controlled analgesia.
Lehmann, KA; Zech, DF, 1995
)
1.15
"Fentanyl is a highly potent, short acting synthetic analgesic indicated as a preanesthetic medication. "( Fentanyl: a review for clinical and analytical toxicologists.
Poklis, A, 1995
)
3.18
"Fentanyl (Sublimaze) is a synthetic opioid used as a combination drug for conscious sedation in patients requiring endoscopic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. "( Fentanyl citrate (fentanyl sublimaze).
Claussen, DS, 1993
)
3.17
"Fentanyl and midazolam are an appropriate combination for postoperative pain treatment."( [Analgosedation with fentanyl/midazolam after correction of congenital heart defects].
Hund, F; Huth, R; Michel-Behnke, I; Oelert, H; Rothes, A; Schmidt, FX; Schranz, D; Wippermann, CF,
)
1.17
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid analgesic with a characteristically brief duration of action. "( Fentanyl transdermal (durogesic, Janssen).
MacConnachie, AM, 1995
)
3.18
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid with short-acting analgesic activity after intravenous or subcutaneous administration. "( Transdermal fentanyl. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in pain control.
Benfield, P; Jeal, W, 1997
)
2.12
"Fentanyl is a synthetic pure opioid agonist with a selective activity on mu receptors. "( [Transdermal fentanyl].
Lossignol, D; Sternon, J, 1998
)
2.11
"Fentanyl is a commonly used narcotic agent in anesthesia. "( Morphine's immunoregulatory actions are not shared by fentanyl.
Bilfinger, TV; Fimiani, C; Stefano, GB, 1998
)
1.99
"Fentanyl is a basic amine shown to have extensive first-pass pulmonary uptake. "( Uptake of fentanyl in pulmonary endothelium.
Avram, MJ; Henthorn, TK; Krejcie, TC; Waters, CM, 1999
)
2.15
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid widely used in anesthesia and analgesia. "( The effect of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on fentanyl metabolism in vitro.
Feierman, DE, 2000
)
2.01
"Fentanyl is a very strong opioid with analgesic properties that are approximately 80 times stronger than those of morphine and therefore is used in major surgery and treatment of pain in tumor patients. "( Comparison of nonradioactive microtiter plate enzyme immunoassays for the sensitive detection of fentanyl.
Käferstein, H; Sticht, G, 2000
)
1.97
"Fentanyl is a potent, short-acting narcotic analgesic widely used as a surgical anesthetic and for the control of pain when administered in the form of a transdermal patch. "( Duragesic transdermal patch: postmortem tissue distribution of fentanyl in 25 cases.
Anderson, DT; Muto, JJ, 2000
)
1.99
"Ohmefentanyl (OMF) is a new mu opioid receptor agonist with high affinity and selectivity, and possesses anesthetic activity. "( [Effects of ohmefentanyl at anesthetic dose on plasma levels of corticosterone, cortisol and antidiuretic hormone in rats].
Chi, ZQ; Jin, WQ; Jin, XL; Li, GF; Zhou, DH, 1997
)
1.2
"Fentanyl 25 microg is a good alternative to sufentanil 5 microg when added to bupivacaine 1.25 mg for early labour analgesia."( Either sufentanil or fentanyl, in addition to intrathecal bupivacaine, provide satisfactory early labour analgesia.
Cheng, CJ; Lim, EH; Loke, GP; Sia, AT; Tan, HM, 2001
)
2.07
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid, suitable for transdermal delivery, offering an interesting solution as a step 3 opioid in cancer pain treatment. "( From codeine to transdermal fentanyl for cancer pain control: a safety and efficacy clinical trial.
Befon, S; Georgaki, S; Gerolymatos, K; Kouskouni, E; Mystakidou, K; Tsilika, E; Vlahos, L,
)
1.87
"Ohmefentanyl is a very potent and highly selective agonist for mu-opioid receptors. "( Analgesic activity and opioid receptor selectivity of stereoisomers of ohmefentanyl isothiocyanate.
Chen, BY; Chen, XJ; Chi, ZQ; Jin, WQ; Zhu, YC, 2001
)
1.1
"Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid agonist which interacts primarily with the mu-opioid receptor. "( Transdermal fentanyl: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in chronic cancer pain control.
Muijsers, RB; Wagstaff, AJ, 2001
)
2.13
"Fentanyl is an opioid agonist and appears to play an important role in regulating the excitability of the hippocampus under electroconvulsion."( Change of hyperexcitability of hippocampus by cyclosporin A and its modulatory action by fentanyl.
Choi, BJ; Whang, KT, 2002
)
1.26
"Fentanyl is a strong, synthetic analgesic which may cause muscular rigidity when administered intravenously. "( Muscle tone under fentanyl-nitrous oxide anaesthesia measured with a transducer apparatus in cholecystecomy incisions.
Askgaard, B; Hansen, JB; Ibler, M; Jansen, E; Nilsson, T, 1977
)
2.03
"Fentanyl would seem to be a desirable addition to an alfathesin infusion technique in unpremedicated patients presenting for outpatient anaesthesia."( The influence of fentanyl on an alfathesin infusion technique.
Dunn, GL; Houlton, PJ; Morison, DH; Rajagopalan, R, 1978
)
1.32
"Fentanyl is an opioid traditionally administered by infusion or injection and more recently in a rate-controlled transdermal dosage form. "( System functionality and physicochemical model of fentanyl transdermal system.
Gale, R; Gupta, SK; Hwang, SS; Southam, M, 1992
)
1.98
"TTS (fentanyl) is a simple and useful technique for the control of postoperative pain."( Transdermal fentanyl: acute analgesic clinical studies.
Sandler, A, 1992
)
1.12
"Fentanyl is a mu opiate agonist which is occasionally abused by medical personnel who have ready access to the drug. "( Subjective and behavioral responses to intravenous fentanyl in healthy volunteers.
de Wit, H; Lichtor, JL; Zacny, JP; Zaragoza, JG, 1992
)
1.98
"Fentanyl is an attractive agent for analgesia in the emergency department. "( Continuous intravenous infusion fentanyl for sedation and analgesia of the multiple trauma patient.
Ferlic, FJ; Smith, GA; Walsh, M; Wieschhaus, MF; Yount, RA, 1991
)
2.01
"Ohmefentanyl (OMF) is a new potent analgesic derived from fentanyl. "( [Pharmacokinetics of [3H]ohmefentanyl in rats].
Chi, ZQ; Jin, WQ; Zhao, GM; Zheng, WJ; Zhou, HY, 1990
)
1.13
"Fentanyl citrate is a synthetic narcotic 1,000 times as potent as meperidine. "( The safety of fentanyl use in the emergency department.
Borron, SW; Chudnofsky, CR; Dronen, SC; Wright, MB; Wright, SW, 1989
)
2.08
"Fentanyl citrate is a potent short-acting narcotic reported to cause less nausea and sedation than morphine or meperidine hydrochloride. "( Fentanyl citrate analgesia during labor.
Chleborad, J; Leuschen, MP; Rathke, A; Rayburn, W; Weidner, W, 1989
)
3.16
"Fentanyl is a synthetic narcotic which, when administered intravenously, has a rapid onset and short duration of action. "( Fentanyl and diazepam for analgesia and sedation during radiologic special procedures.
Miller, DL; Wall, RT, 1987
)
3.16

Effects

Fentanyl has a synergistic interaction with both propofol and midazolam on PNA and hence potentially on respiration. Fentanyl has an analgesic effect 100 times greater than that of morphine; therefore, transdermal administration of fentanyl has been widely used to control pain.

Fentanyl citrate has properties, including agonism of the mu-opioid receptor and proconvulsant activity, that theoretically could pose adverse effects in ischemic brain. Fentanyl has been shown to be effective for the management of intense pain of short duration.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Fentanyl has a long terminal elimination, with a documented secondary peaking phenomenon that can manifest as "fentanyl rebound." Clinical implications in overdose (respiratory depression, muscle rigidity, and "wooden chest syndrome") and opioid use disorder treatment (subjective effects, withdrawal, and buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal) are discussed."( Fentanyl Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion: Narrative Review and Clinical Significance Related to Illicitly Manufactured Fentanyl.
Bird, HE; Dunn, KE; Huhn, AS,
)
2.3
"Fentanyl has a strong first pass effect when administered orally and resorbed enterally, however it is well suited for transmucosal administration, e.g."( [Transmucosal fentanyl administration: sublingual, buccal, nasal - all the same? Treatment of breakthrough cancer pain].
Überall, MA, 2017
)
1.54
"Fentanyl has a low molecular weight and is lipophilic making it suitable for transdermal administration. "( Unusual case of transdermal fentanyl in cachexia.
Harrison, S; Kay, S; Lam, D; Pickard, J, 2019
)
2.25
"Fentanyl has an analgesic effect 100 times greater than that of morphine; therefore, transdermal administration of fentanyl has been widely used to control pain. "( Fentanyl intoxication caused by abuse of transdermal fentanyl.
Chun, BJ; Moon, JM, 2011
)
3.25
"Fentanyl has a synergistic interaction with both propofol and midazolam on PNA and hence potentially on respiration."( Synergistic interaction between the effects of propofol and midazolam with fentanyl on phrenic nerve activity in rabbits.
Chakrabarti, MK; Ma, D; Sapsed-Byrne, SM; Whitwam, JG, 1998
)
1.97
"Fentanyl has a 7 gram usage versus a 100 gram INCB allocation."( Opioid use in chronic pain management in the Philippines.
Espinosa, EL; Harder, SM; Javier, FO; Magpantay, LA; Unite, MA, 2001
)
1.03
"Fentanyl has replaced most other non-prescribed opioids in much of North America. "( Modeling of overdose and naloxone distribution in the setting of fentanyl compared to heroin.
Coffin, PO; Kahn, JG; Maya, S, 2022
)
2.4
"Fentanyl has led to an increased number of overdose deaths in North America. "( Behavior change after fentanyl testing at a safe consumption space for women in Northern Mexico: A pilot study.
Angulo, L; Arredondo, J; Cambou, MC; Gonzalez-Nieto, P; Goodman-Meza, D; Loera, A; Pitpitan, EV; Shoptaw, S; Slim, S, 2022
)
2.48
"Fentanyl has played a significant role in the opioid crisis, proving to be a persistent problem due to its analgesic effects and addictive nature. "( Fentanyl analog trends in Washington D.C. observed in needle-exchange syringes.
Cicco, C; Evans, A; Giltner, A; Leach, S; Rowe, W, 2022
)
3.61
"Fentanyl has come to dominate the U.S. "( Characteristics and correlates of fentanyl preferences among people with opioid use disorder.
Dusek, K; Gryczynski, J; Hochstatter, KR; Mitchell, SG; Schwartz, RP; Terplan, M; Wireman, K, 2022
)
2.44
"Fentanyl has replaced heroin as a street drug for opioid dependent drug users."( Changing Landscape of Fentanyl/Heroin Use and Distribution.
Bevins, N; Jensen, K; Pesce, A; Thomas, R; Tran, K, 2023
)
2.67
"Fentanyl has contributed to a sharp rise in the toxicity of the unregulated drug supply and fatal overdoses in Canada. "( Impact of safer supply programs on injection practices: client and provider experiences in Ontario, Canada.
Gagnon, M; Guta, A; Kolla, G; Kryszajtys, DT; Rudzinski, K; Schmidt, RA; Strike, C, 2023
)
2.35
"Fentanyl has emerged as the most prolific drug in the ongoing opioid epidemic and has greatly impacted traffic safety in recent years. "( The impact of fentanyl on DUIDs and traffic fatalities: Blood and oral fluid data.
Harper, CE; Lee, D; Mata, DC, 2023
)
2.71
"Fentanyl has distinct pharmacodynamics and enhanced efficacy relative to other opioids that highlights the need to investigate how females may be uniquely altered by its use."( Focus on fentanyl in females: Sex and gender differences in the physiological and behavioral effects of fentanyl.
Kosten, TA; Little, KM, 2023
)
2.05
"Fentanyl has a long terminal elimination, with a documented secondary peaking phenomenon that can manifest as "fentanyl rebound." Clinical implications in overdose (respiratory depression, muscle rigidity, and "wooden chest syndrome") and opioid use disorder treatment (subjective effects, withdrawal, and buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal) are discussed."( Fentanyl Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion: Narrative Review and Clinical Significance Related to Illicitly Manufactured Fentanyl.
Bird, HE; Dunn, KE; Huhn, AS,
)
2.3
"Fentanyl has become widespread in the illicit opioid supply, and is a major driver of overdose mortality."( Fentanyl exposure and preferences among individuals starting treatment for opioid use disorder.
Gryczynski, J; Hill, P; Mitchell, SG; Nichols, H; Schwartz, RP; Wireman, K, 2019
)
3.4
"Fentanyl has been implicated as a major contributor to the increased number of opioid overdose deaths. "( Fentanyl overdoses and pharmacogenetics.
Gerhard, GS; Kaniper, S; Paynton, B, 2020
)
3.44
"Fentanyl has caused rapid increases in US and Canadian overdose deaths, yet its presence in illicit drugs is often unknown to consumers. "( An assessment of the limits of detection, sensitivity and specificity of three devices for public health-based drug checking of fentanyl in street-acquired samples.
Clarke, W; Gilbert, M; Green, TC; Lucas, R; McKenzie, M; Park, JN; Sherman, SG; Struth, E, 2020
)
2.21
"Fentanyl has been FDA approval as an analgesic since 1968 and multiple different fentanyl preparations have been developed over the years. "( Reasons to avoid fentanyl.
Behm, B; Davis, MP, 2020
)
2.34
"Fentanyl has been associated with many drug overdose deaths; its presence in many street drugs has been postulated to be increasing. "( Correlation of Fentanyl Positive Drug Screens with Other Medications in Patients from Pain, Rehabilitation and Behavioral Programs.
Greg Ackerman, RT; Krock, K; Nickley, J; Pesce, A; Tran, K, 2020
)
2.35
"Fentanyl analogs have been identified as important contributors to these overdoses, but little is known about their prevalence in patients seeking health care."( Fentanyl analog positivity among near-real-time urine drug test results in patients seeking health care.
Bundy, WL; Dawson, E; Huskey, A; LaRue, L; Stanton, JD; Whitley, P, 2020
)
2.72
"Fentanyl has spread westward, increasing deaths in the short-term and threatening to dramatically worsen the nation's already severe opioid epidemic in the long-term. "( Steep increases in fentanyl-related mortality west of the Mississippi River: Recent evidence from county and state surveillance.
Cunningham, NJ; Dwyer, CL; Falasinnu, TO; Freedman, RB; Humphreys, K; Santos, NB; Shover, CL; Vest, NA, 2020
)
2.33
"Fentanyl has become the most frequently identified opioid in DUID cases, with many suspected heroin cases turning out to be only fentanyl."( 11-Year Study of Fentanyl in Driving Under the Influence of Drugs Casework†.
Bierly, JJ; Chan-Hosokawa, A, 2022
)
1.78
"New fentanyl analogues have been constantly emerging into the illegal drug market as cheap substitutes of heroin posing a serious health threat for consumers because of their high toxicity. "( Determination of nine new fentanyl analogues and metabolites in consumers' urine by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Busardò, FP; Gottardi, M; Mannocchi, G; Pirani, F; Ricci, G; Sirignano, A, 2021
)
1.48
"Fentanyl has emerged as a recreational drug, often in combination with heroin, and can result in lethality during overdose."( Fentanyl-Induced Brain Hypoxia Triggers Brain Hyperglycemia and Biphasic Changes in Brain Temperature.
Cameron-Burr, KT; Kiyatkin, EA; Shaham, Y; Solis, E, 2018
)
2.64
"Fentanyl has a strong first pass effect when administered orally and resorbed enterally, however it is well suited for transmucosal administration, e.g."( [Transmucosal fentanyl administration: sublingual, buccal, nasal - all the same? Treatment of breakthrough cancer pain].
Überall, MA, 2017
)
1.54
"Fentanyl has been suggested to be effective for controlling airway and hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation. "( Comparison of the effects of oxycodone versus fentanyl on airway reflex to tracheal extubation and postoperative pain during anesthesia recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind, randomized clinical consort study.
Choi, EK; Kwon, N; Park, SJ, 2018
)
2.18
"Fentanyl has increasingly been detected in fatal overdose deaths in Marion County. "( Fentanyl related overdose in Indianapolis: Estimating trends using multilevel Bayesian models.
Greene, MS; Huynh, P; Phalen, P; Ray, B; Watson, DP, 2018
)
3.37
"Fentanyl has a low molecular weight and is lipophilic making it suitable for transdermal administration. "( Unusual case of transdermal fentanyl in cachexia.
Harrison, S; Kay, S; Lam, D; Pickard, J, 2019
)
2.25
"Two fentanyl isomers that have been in the spotlight lately due to difficulties regarding separation and identification are cyclopropylfentanyl and crotonylfentanyl, which have been reported to display nearly identical fragmentation patterns and chromatographic behavior."( Distinguishing Between Cyclopropylfentanyl and Crotonylfentanyl by Methods Commonly Available in the Forensic Laboratory.
Bergh, MS; Bogen, IL; Wilson, SR; Wohlfarth, A; Øiestad, ÅML, 2019
)
1.27
"Fentanyl has become pervasive as a drug of abuse and as adulterant in seized drugs. "( Analysis of fentanyl derivatives by ultra high performance liquid chromatography with diode array ultraviolet and single quadrupole mass spectrometric detection.
Angi, C; Lurie, IS; Marginean, I, 2019
)
2.34
"Fentanyl has been shown to have peripheral effects but has not been used as a perineural infusate alone after TKA."( Knee strength retention and analgesia with continuous perineural fentanyl infusion after total knee replacement: randomized controlled trial.
Bernasek, TL; Camporesi, E; Downes, KL; Gustke, K; Karlnoski, RA; Mangar, D; Sprenker, CJ; Taffe, N; Wainwright, R, 2014
)
1.36
"Fentanyl has been widely used in anesthesia and analgesia, especially for cardiovascular surgeries. "( Spinal neuronal NOS activation mediates intrathecal fentanyl preconditioning induced remote cardioprotection in rats.
Dong, C; Hu, J; Lu, Y; Zhang, Y, 2014
)
2.1
"Fentanyl ITS has been shown to be therapeutically equivalent to morphine intravenous (iv.) patient-controlled analgesia."( Development of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) for patient-controlled analgesia of postoperative pain management.
Danesi, H; Ding, L; Jones, JB; Minkowitz, HS, 2015
)
1.47
"Fentanyl ITS has shown high patient satisfaction rates, and was described by patients and investigators as easy and convenient to use. "( Pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system for post-operative pain in hospitalized patients.
Chelly, JE; Lachell, CM; Skledar, SJ, 2015
)
2.12
"Fentanyl has been safely used in children for many years."( The effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on emergence characteristics after adenoidectomy in children.
Begec, Z; Demirbilek, S; Erdil, F; Ersoy, MO; Ozturk, E; Ulger, MH, 2009
)
1.35
"Fentanyl has been used for cancer pain in transdermal formulation. "( Validated LC coupled to ESI-MS/MS analysis for fentanyl in human plasma and UV analysis in applied reservoir transdermal patches using a simple and rapid procedure.
Kagawa, Y; Kawakami, J; Mino, Y; Naito, T; Takashina, Y, 2009
)
2.05
"Fentanyl has several potential advantages for out-of-hospital analgesia, including rapid onset, short duration, and less histamine release. "( Effectiveness and safety of fentanyl compared with morphine for out-of-hospital analgesia.
Daya, M; Fleischman, RJ; Frazer, DG; Jui, J; Newgard, CD,
)
1.87
"Fentanyl has also been confirmed to produce sedation in pregnant women when used as an alternative."( Prevention of local anesthetic systemic toxicity.
Hejtmanek, MR; Mulroy, MF,
)
0.85
"Fentanyl sublingual has been formulated as a rapidly disintegrating tablet that is quickly absorbed, producing a fast onset of analgesia."( Fentanyl sublingual: in breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adults with cancer.
Chwieduk, CM; McKeage, K, 2010
)
2.52
"Fentanyl patches have been used for longer and have a larger body of evidence supporting their use, with data to suggest improved pain relief and reduced opioid side effects compared with sustained release oral morphine."( Transdermal opioids for cancer pain.
Ahmedzai, SH; Cachia, E, 2011
)
1.09
"Fentanyl has been shown to be a potent analgesic with a lower propensity to produce tolerance and physical dependence in the clinical setting. "( Possible involvement of mu1-opioid receptors in the fentanyl- or morphine-induced antinociception at supraspinal and spinal sites.
Imai, S; Itou, Y; Narita, M; Suzuki, T; Yajima, Y, 2002
)
2.01
"Fentanyl has been shown to be a potent analgesic with a lower propensity to produce tolerance and physical dependence in the clinical setting."( Transcriptional regulation of mu opioid receptor gene by cAMP pathway.
Lee, PW; Lee, YM, 2003
)
1.04
"Fentanyl itself has significant effects on the cardiovascular and endocrine system, which might adversely affect the fetus."( Cardiovascular and endocrine responses to cutaneous electrical stimulation after fentanyl in the ovine fetus.
Fisk, NM; Glover, V; Hanson, MA; Igosheva, N; Jenkin, G; Miller, SL; Peebles, DM; Smith, RP, 2004
)
1.27
"Fentanyl has been used as an adjunct to racemic bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia."( Levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial.
Chan, CK; Cheung, AS; Lee, YY; Muchhal, K, 2005
)
1.37
"Aminofentanyl has also been successfully acylated with ethyl isocyanate, various acid anhydrides, to further investigate structure-activity relationships of these new fentanyl derivatives."( Synthesis and evaluation of 3-aminopropionyl substituted fentanyl analogues for opioid activity.
Begay, LJ; Davis, P; Hruby, VJ; Lai, JY; Lee, YS; Ma, SW; Petrov, RR; Porreca, F; Vardanyan, RS, 2006
)
1.03
"Fentanyl has been used as a spinal analgesic in surgery and obstetrics with several studies promoting its efficacy and safety. "( A prospective randomized double-blind trial of the use of intrathecal fentanyl in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery.
Chan, JH; Heilpern, GN; Knibb, AA; Marsh, GD; Packham, I; Trehan, RK, 2006
)
2.01
"The fentanyl ITS has the potential to become a valuable option in the management of acute postoperative pain."( Fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS): clinical application of iontophoretic technology in the management of acute postoperative pain.
Power, I, 2007
)
2.26
"Fentanyl has an analgesic effect 100 times greater than that of morphine; therefore, transdermal administration of fentanyl has been widely used to control pain. "( Fentanyl intoxication caused by abuse of transdermal fentanyl.
Chun, BJ; Moon, JM, 2011
)
3.25
"TTS fentanyl has been used widely in the USA since it was approved for marketing in 1990."( Transdermal fentanyl: clinical development in the United States.
Simmonds, MA, 1995
)
1.15
"Fentanyl-fluanisone has stimulating effects on the amount of spike-wave discharges, but not in a dose-dependent manner."( Effects of the neuroleptanalgesic fentanyl-fluanisone (Hypnorm) on spike-wave discharges in epileptic rats.
Ates, N; Coenen, AM; Inoue, M; Vossen, JM, 1994
)
1.29
"Norfentanyl has been identified previously as a urinary metabolite of fentanyl. "( Biotransformation of tritiated fentanyl in human liver microsomes. Monitoring metabolism using phenylacetic acid and 2-phenylethanol.
Guengerich, FP; Tateishi, T; Wood, AJ; Wood, M, 1995
)
1.2
"Fentanyl citrate has properties, including agonism of the mu-opioid receptor and proconvulsant activity, that theoretically could pose adverse effects in ischemic brain. "( High-dose fentanyl does not adversely affect outcome from forebrain ischemia in the rat.
Bart, RD; Dexter, F; Morimoto, Y; Pearlstein, RD; Warner, DS, 1997
)
2.14
"Fentanyl has a synergistic interaction with both propofol and midazolam on PNA and hence potentially on respiration."( Synergistic interaction between the effects of propofol and midazolam with fentanyl on phrenic nerve activity in rabbits.
Chakrabarti, MK; Ma, D; Sapsed-Byrne, SM; Whitwam, JG, 1998
)
1.97
"Fentanyl has been incorporated into a transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) containing a rate-limiting membrane that provides constant release of the opioid. "( A clinical evaluation of transdermal therapeutic system fentanyl for the treatment of cancer pain.
Hays, H; Moulin, DE; Sloan, PA, 1998
)
1.99
"fentanyl has been shown to be an effective analgesic for labor; this study investigated the analgesic effect of low-dose bpivacaine added to intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia"( Bupivacaine augments intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia.
Alves, D; Nogami, WM; Palmer, CM; Van Maren, G, 1999
)
2.03
"Fentanyl has no effect on the perceived intensity or unpleasantness of vibratory stimulation, which continues to activate contralateral S1."( Selective opiate modulation of nociceptive processing in the human brain.
Casey, KL; Jone, C; Minoshima, S; Morrow, TJ; Raz, J; Svensson, P, 2000
)
1.03
"Fentanyl has been shown to be effective for the management of intense pain of short duration. "( The efficacy and safety of fentanyl for the management of severe procedural pain in patients with burn injuries.
Burd, RS; Linneman, PK; Terry, BE,
)
1.87
"Fentanyl has a 7 gram usage versus a 100 gram INCB allocation."( Opioid use in chronic pain management in the Philippines.
Espinosa, EL; Harder, SM; Javier, FO; Magpantay, LA; Unite, MA, 2001
)
1.03
"Ohmefentanyl has three asymmetric C atoms and, therefore, has eight possible stereoisomers."( (1R)-2-[(3R,4S)-3-Methyl-4-(N-phenyl-N-propionylamino)piperidin-1-yl]-1-phenylethyl p-bromobenzoate and N-[(3R,4S)-1-[(2S)-2-(4-bromophenyl)-2-hydroxyethyl]-3-methyl-piperidin-4-yl]-N-phenylacrylamide.
Deschamps, JR; Flippen-Anderson, JL; George, C, 2002
)
0.8
"Fentanyl has been shown to increase the overall resistance to inspiratory flow of the ventilatory system (Rmax). "( Effect of fentanyl on ventilatory resistances during barbiturate general anaesthesia.
Cohendy, R; Eledjam, JJ; Laracine, M; Lefrant, JY; Rebiere, T, 1992
)
2.13
"TTS fentanyl has been developed to provide continuous controlled systemic delivery of fentanyl base for 72 hr."( Transdermal fentanyl: clinical pharmacology.
Lehmann, KA; Zech, D, 1992
)
1.14
"Ohmefentanyl has been shown to be 6300 times more potent than morphine for analgesia. "( [3H]ohmefentanyl preferentially binds to mu-opioid receptors but also labels sigma-sites in rat brain sections.
Chi, ZQ; Pélaprat, D; Roques, BP; Rostène, W; Vanhove, A; Wang, H, 1991
)
1.27
"Fentanyl has been formulated as a transdermal patch that seems to provide the same degree of analgesia as a continuous i.v."( Clinical uses of fentanyl, sufentanil, and alfentanil.
Clotz, MA; Nahata, MC, 1991
)
1.34
"Ohmefentanyl has significant inhibitory actions on the electrically evoked contractions of guinea pig ileum and mouse vas deferens. "( The choice of opioid receptor subtype in isolated preparations by ohmefentanyl.
Chen, XJ; Chi, ZQ; Jin, WQ, 1987
)
1.06
"Fentanyl has distinct pharmacologic advantages over both morphine and meperidine for use in radiologic special procedures."( Fentanyl and diazepam for analgesia and sedation during radiologic special procedures.
Miller, DL; Wall, RT, 1987
)
2.44

Actions

Fentanyl can enhance analgesia by a peripheral mechanism. Fentanyl displays a large apparent volume of distribution, short plasma half life and extensive biotransformation. Both fentanyl and morphine increase latencies while affecting amplitudes unpredictably.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"If fentanyl does cause more hyperalgesia compared to other opioids, it does not seem to have a significant impact on opioid consumption after ED discharge."( Association between fentanyl treatment for acute pain in the emergency department and opioid use two weeks after discharge.
Chauny, JM; Choinière, M; Cournoyer, A; Daoust, R; Emond, M; Gosselin, S; Huard, V; Lang, E; Lavigne, G; Paquet, J; Perry, JJ; Williamson, D; Yan, JW, 2022
)
1.56
"Fentanyl did not increase the incidence of severe adverse events (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.90; low-quality evidence) or delirium (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.79 to 2.04; low-quality evidence)."( Effects of fentanyl administration in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aoki, Y; Doi, M; Fujimura, N; Kato, H; Sakuraya, M; Suzuki, Y, 2022
)
1.83
"Fentanyl can increase the intrasynaptic release of serotonin through their effects on y-amino butyric acid and its phenylpiperidine chemical structure. "( Linezolid and fentanyl: An underrecognized drug-to-drug interaction.
Abu Saleh, O; Barth, D; Corsini Campioli, C; Esquer Garrigos, Z; Sia, IG; Sohail, RM, 2020
)
2.36
"The fentanyl-induced increase in analgesia was minimally affected by a 1.5mg/kg of NLXmi but was attenuated by a 5.0mg/kg dose."( Role of central and peripheral opiate receptors in the effects of fentanyl on analgesia, ventilation and arterial blood-gas chemistry in conscious rats.
Baby, SM; Discala, JF; Gruber, RB; Henderson, F; Lewis, SJ; May, WJ; Puskovic, V; Young, AP, 2014
)
1.12
"The fentanyl group showed lower levels of troponin at the end of the sixth hour compared with the saline group (1.91 ± 1.47 vs 5.44 ± 5.35 ng/mL, P = 0.019)."( Myocardial protection induced by fentanyl in pigs exposed to high-dose adrenaline.
Caldini, EG; Carmona, MJ; da Luz, VF; Damaceno-Rodrigues, NR; Gonzalez, MM; Malbouisson, LM; Negri, EM; Otsuki, DA; Vane, MF; Viana, BG, 2015
)
1.18
"fentanyl, may suppress this undesirable spasmodic cough."( A huffing manoeuvre, immediately before induction of anaesthesia, prevents fentanyl-induced coughing: a prospective, randomized, and controlled study.
Ambesh, SP; Gupta, D; Singh, N; Singh, PK; Singh, U, 2010
)
1.31
"Fentanyl did not increase intra-abdominal pressures in dogs."( Influence of fentanyl on intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy in dogs.
Ambrisko, TD; Dörfelt, R; Moens, Y, 2012
)
2.19
"Fentanyl failed to inhibit receptor expression, phagocytosis and reactive oxygen production by monocytes in clinically relevant as well as supraclinical concentrations."( [Morphine inhibits complement receptor expression, phagocytosis and oxidative burst by a nitric oxide dependent mechanism].
Hempelmann, G; Hirsch, J; Menzebach, A; Mogk, M; Nöst, R; Welters, ID, 2004
)
1.04
"With fentanyl, there was an increase of heart rate by 17%, and systolic blood pressure by 7% when compared to control. "( Reflex activity caused by laryngoscopy and intubation is obtunded differently by meptazinol, nalbuphine and fentanyl.
Freye, E; Levy, JV, 2007
)
1.07
"Fentanyl did not produce a significant antinociceptive effect at the doses used, 2 of which resulted in serum concentrations above the nociceptive threshold in other species."( Effect of fentanyl on visceral and somatic nociception in conscious horses.
Cole, C; Maxwell, LK; Robertson, SA; Sanchez, LC; Zientek, K,
)
1.98
"Both fentanyl and morphine increase latencies while affecting amplitudes unpredictably."( Effects of fentanyl and morphine on intraoperative somatosensory cortical-evoked potentials.
Brown, RH; Cascorbi, HF; Nash, CL; Pathak, KS, 1984
)
1.11
"Fentanyl displays a large apparent volume of distribution, short plasma half life and extensive biotransformation."( Fentanyl: a review for clinical and analytical toxicologists.
Poklis, A, 1995
)
2.46
"Fentanyl can enhance analgesia by a peripheral mechanism. "( The peripheral effect of fentanyl on postoperative pain.
Braslavsky, A; Ferman, R; Kissin, I; Mazor, A; Tverskoy, M, 1998
)
2.05
"Fentanyl inhibited an increase of the proinflammatory cytokines, TNF-alpha and IL-1beta levels, during global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion in rats."( Effect of fentanyl on TNF-alpha and IL-1beta levels during global ischemia/reperfusion in rats.
Oh, WS, 2002
)
1.44
"Fentanyl did not produce a statistically significant further diminution of the pain from the level of relief obtained with Propofol."( [Changes in the pain produced by the peripheral venous injection of propofol when it is combined with lidocaine or fentanyl].
Croston, J; de Henriquez, L; de Jiménez, L; Espinosa, V, 1992
)
1.21
"Fentanyl, because of its greater lipophilicity, offers a number of advantages over morphine for epidural analgesia, including a lower incidence of side effects and reduced risk of delayed-onset respiratory depression."( Fentanyl: clinical use as postoperative analgesic--epidural/intrathecal route.
Grass, JA, 1992
)
2.45
"Fentanyl did not cause any statistically significant amplitude changes in this small population."( Effects of propofol, etomidate, midazolam, and fentanyl on motor evoked responses to transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation in humans.
Bickford, RG; Drummond, JC; Kalkman, CJ; Patel, PM; Ribberink, AA; Sano, T, 1992
)
1.26
"Fentanyl caused little increase in the latencies of middle-latency-SEPs and of peak P2 of the VEPs."( [Effect of fentanyl and enflurane on sensory evoked potentials in the human in basic flunitrazepam/N2O anesthesia].
Pasch, T; Schramm, J; Thurner, F, 1987
)
1.38

Treatment

Fentanyl post-treatment reduced necrotizing AP severity, whereas pre-treatment exacerbated it. Fentanyl treatment resulted in increased wound angiogenesis, lymphatic vasculature, nerve fibers, nitric oxide, NOS and PDGFR-β signaling.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Fentanyl treatment during therapeutic hypothermia does not negatively affect the neurodevelopmental outcome, thus on the contrary, it may contribute to ameliorate neuroprotection in the asphyxiated cooled newborns."( Fentanyl analgesia in asphyxiated newborns treated with therapeutic hypothermia.
Bedetti, L; Berardi, A; Della Casa, E; Ferrari, F; Garetti, E; Guidotti, I; Iughetti, L; Lago, P; Lucaccioni, L; Lugli, L; Pugliese, M; Roversi, MF; Spada, C, 2022
)
3.61
"Fentanyl post-treatment reduced necrotizing AP severity, whereas pre-treatment exacerbated it."( Fentanyl but Not Morphine or Buprenorphine Improves the Severity of Necrotizing Acute Pancreatitis in Rats.
Bálint, ER; Balla, Z; Benyhe, S; Ducza, E; Fűr, G; Hegyi, P; Horváth, G; Kiss, L; Kormányos, ES; Kui, B; Maléth, J; Orján, EM; Pallagi, P; Rakonczay, Z; Szűcs, E; Tóth, B; Venglovecz, V, 2022
)
2.89
"Fentanyl-treated mice showed a significantly reduced ability to survive under hypoxic c"( A comparative examination of morphine and fentanyl: unravelling the differential impacts on breathing and airway stability.
Baertsch, NA; Burgraff, NJ; Ramirez, JM, 2023
)
1.9
"Fentanyl treatment at all doses significantly reduced nociceptive response in the EVF test throughout the 72 h of experimentation, reduced facial expressions on all days postoperatively, slightly reduced the body weight and improved postoperative welfare parameters."( Transdermal Fentanyl Solution Provides Long-term Analgesia in the Hind-paw Incisional Model of Postoperative Pain in Male Rats.
Abelson, KSP; Clemensen, J; Rasmussen, LV,
)
1.95
"The fentanyl pretreatment group had a higher frequency of apnea (94% vs 64%; P=0.0003) and longer duration of manual ventilation (3 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.5-5] min vs 1 [0-1.5] min; P<0.0001) at induction."( Effects of fentanyl administration before induction of anesthesia and placement of the Laryngeal Mask Airway: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Gasanova, I; Joshi, GP; Kamali, A; Meng, J; Rosero, E, 2014
)
1.27
"Fentanyl treatment resulted in increased wound angiogenesis, lymphatic vasculature, nerve fibers, nitric oxide, NOS and PDGFR-β signaling as compared to PBS."( Topical fentanyl stimulates healing of ischemic wounds in diabetic rats.
Ericson, ME; Farooqui, M; Gupta, K; Gupta, M; Poonawala, T, 2015
)
1.57
"Fentanyl treatment did not alter these patterns."( Influence of fentanyl on intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy in dogs.
Ambrisko, TD; Dörfelt, R; Moens, Y, 2012
)
1.47
"The fentanyl treatment produced significantly higher levels of SC and plasma cortisol and adrenaline compared with the other 3 treatments."( Skin conductance reflects drug-induced changes in blood levels of cortisol, adrenaline and noradrenaline in dogs.
Akiyoshi, H; Iseri, T; Ishibashi, M; Ohashi, F, 2013
)
0.87
"Fentanyl treated patients were more sedated in the PACU compared to the non-opioid group. "( Non-opioid analgesia improves pain relief and decreases sedation after gastric bypass surgery.
Beckerman, M; Feld, JM; Hoffman, WE; Laurito, CE; Vincent, J, 2003
)
1.76
"In fentanyl-treated rats with inflammatory or incisional pain, nitrous oxide strongly limited both magnitude and duration of hyperalgesia."( Nitrous oxide revisited: evidence for potent antihyperalgesic properties.
Creton, C; Laulin, JP; Lemaire, M; Maurette, P; Richebé, P; Rivat, C; Simonnet, G, 2005
)
0.84
"Both fentanyl and morphine treatments resulted in clear antinociceptive properties as well as reductions in cancer cell-induced bone lesions."( The impact of the opioids fentanyl and morphine on nociception and bone destruction in a murine model of bone cancer pain.
El Mouedden, M; Meert, TF, 2007
)
1.09
"fentanyl for the treatment of acute pain in children."( Randomized clinical trial of nebulized fentanyl citrate versus i.v. fentanyl citrate in children presenting to the emergency department with acute pain.
Biros, MH; Herold, M; Hubbard, D; Kletti, C; Miner, JR, 2007
)
1.33
"Fentanyl treatment caused a significant attenuation of the blood pressure and pulse response to laryngoscopy and intubation."( Treatment of stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation with fentanyl.
Dahlgren, N; Messeter, K, 1981
)
1.22
"The fentanyl-treated mice in groups 2 and 3 had a significantly longer time to first paw lick, had a lower number of paw licks, and had a shorter duration of paw licking compared to the control mice in group 1. "( The effect of pre-emptive fentanyl on formalin pain in mice.
Fu, ES; Scharf, JE,
)
0.99
"Fentanyl pretreatment attenuated the increases in HR and in MAP that occurred with 5.0% isoflurane (P < 0.01)."( Fentanyl pretreatment attenuates the haemodynamic response to sudden inhalation of 5% isoflurane.
Ishida, K; Kinoshita, H; Taira, Y; Wakamatsu, H; Yonei, A, 1995
)
2.46
"In fentanyl-treated patients, HR decreased 8 bpm after opioid injection but returned to preopioid rates after skull-pin insertion."( The effect of skull-pin insertion on cerebrospinal fluid pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence of sufentanil and fentanyl.
Archer, D; Bonnafous, M; David, P; Ecoffey, C; Jamali, S; Ravussin, P, 1997
)
1.02
"Both fentanyl and lidocaine treatments (Groups B and C) were significantly better than placebo (Group A) in reducing pain on propofol injection (p < 0.005). "( Comparison of intravenous retention of fentanyl and lidocaine on local analgesia in propofol injection pain.
Chang, DP; Chung, YT; Hong, MH; Huang, S; Lin, SS; Pang, WW, 1997
)
1.08
"ET (fentanyl) treatments with 200 microA direct current applied for 30 min at frequent (hourly) or infrequent (4-hourly) intervals over a 24-h period were compared."( Reproducible fentanyl doses delivered intermittently at different time intervals from an electrotransport system.
Gupta, SK; Klausner, M; Phipps, B; Sathyan, G; Southam, M, 1999
)
1.15
"Fentanyl-treated rats had higher mean arterial blood pressure after injury (p < 0.05); however, ICP and brain water were similar between groups."( Isoflurane improves long-term neurologic outcome versus fentanyl after traumatic brain injury in rats.
Alexander, HL; Clark, RS; Dixon, CE; Graham, SH; Jenkins, LW; Kochanek, PM; Marion, DW; Safar, PJ; Statler, KD; Warner, DS; Wisniewski, SR, 2000
)
1.27
"fentanyl. Pretreatment with 0.1 mg/kg of scopolamine enhanced the antinociceptive effect of a submaximal dose of fentanyl in both animal models."( GABAmimetics diminish antinociception of meperidine under conditions which enhance other opioid mu-agonists.
Bergman, SA; Leventer, M; Rudo, FG; Wynn, RL,
)
0.85
"Fentanyl-treated patients had a higher incidence of hypotension (P less than 0.05)."( Haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in geriatric patients: effects of fentanyl, lidocaine and thiopentone.
Cervenko, F; Splinter, WM, 1989
)
1.22
"The fentanyl-treated patients resumed spontaneous ventilation more rapidly at the end of anaesthesia (3 minutes) than the alfentanil-treated group (5.1 minutes, p less than 0.02)."( A double blind comparison of alfentanil and fentanyl.
Liberman, H; Pybus, DA; Torda, TA, 1985
)
1.01
"Fentanyl pretreatment significantly decreased the incidence of pain on injection and myoclonus, but it increased the incidence of apnea when anesthesia was induced with etomidate."( Etomidate versus thiopental for induction of anesthesia.
Giese, JL; Nelissen, RH; Pace, NL; Stanley, TH; Stockham, RJ, 1985
)
0.99
"Rats treated with fentanyl in RGD liposome and POD device exhibited greater analgesic effect, as compared with the free drug counterpart (AUC(effect) = 1387.1% vs."( Aerosol-stable peptide-coated liposome nanoparticles: a proof-of-concept study with opioid fentanyl in enhancing analgesic effects and reducing plasma drug exposure.
Ho, RJ; Hoekman, JD; Srivastava, P, 2014
)
0.95
"Treatment with fentanyl inhibited the tumor growth and HCT116 cells invasion. "( Fentanyl inhibits proliferation and invasion of colorectal cancer via β-catenin.
Chen, ML; Zhang, XL; Zhou, SL, 2015
)
2.21
"Pretreatment with fentanyl has been reported to be effective in reducing propofol-induced pain."( A comparison of pretreatment with fentanyl and lidocaine preceded by venous occlusion for reducing pain on injection of propofol: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adult Japanese surgical patients.
Fujii, Y; Itakura, M, 2009
)
0.96
"Treatment with fentanyl 1 mcg/kg was associated with a lower frequency of movement during procedure compared with treatment with fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg (P = .0476) or treatment with placebo (P = .0545)."( Prospective randomized crossover evaluation of three anesthetic regimens for painful procedures in children with cancer.
Anghelescu, DL; Burgoyne, LL; Faughnan, LG; Hankins, GM; Pui, CH; Smeltzer, MP, 2013
)
0.73
"Treatment with fentanyl-TTS was started for the first time in patients with severe pain caused by coxarthrosis and/or gonarthrosis and was prospectively documented for 30 days. "( [Fentanyl-TTS in the treatment of pain caused by arthrosis].
Krämer, J; Schwalen, S; Theodoridis, T; Waap, I,
)
1.39
"Treatment with fentanyl-TTS was usually well-tolerated."( [Fentanyl-TTS in the treatment of pain caused by arthrosis].
Krämer, J; Schwalen, S; Theodoridis, T; Waap, I,
)
1.38
"Pretreatment with fentanyl was not significantly different than controls."( Differential effects of opioid peptides on myocardial ischemic tolerance.
Bolling, SF; McNish, R; Romano, MA; Seymour, EM; Traynor, JR, 2004
)
0.65
"Pretreatment with fentanyl before exposure to chloroethylclonidine increased the maximal contractile response to phenylephrine compared to chloroethylclonidine pretreatment alone."( Fentanyl attenuates alpha1B-adrenoceptor-mediated pulmonary artery contraction.
Ding, X; McCune, DF; Murray, PA; Perez, DM; Sohn, JT, 2005
)
2.09
"Pre-treatment with fentanyl 1.5 microg/kg IV yielded no reduction in post-operative pain or analgesic consumption after 90 min of remifentanil-based anaesthesia with 0.43 microg/kg/min of remifentanil."( Administration of fentanyl before remifentanil-based anaesthesia has no influence on post-operative pain or analgesic consumption.
Hoymork, SC; Lenz, H; Raeder, J, 2008
)
1.01
"Pretreatment with fentanyl may inhibit propofol-induced yawning. "( Clinical assessment of propofol-induced yawning with heart rate variability: a pilot study.
Fan, KT; Kao, T; Koenig, HM; Luk, HN; Tsou, CH; Wang, JH, 2008
)
0.68
"Pretreatment with fentanyl (5.4 micrograms, intrathecally) depressed tibial C-fiber reflexes by only 23.8% without any significant effect on either tibial A delta or radial A delta and C fiber responses."( Specific enhancement by fentanyl of the effects of intrathecal bupivacaine on nociceptive afferent but not on sympathetic efferent pathways in dogs.
Chakrabarti, MK; Wang, C; Whitwam, JG, 1993
)
0.92
"pretreatment with fentanyl, morphine, meperidine, or lidocaine in reducing propofol injection pain."( The analgesic effect of fentanyl, morphine, meperidine, and lidocaine in the peripheral veins: a comparative study.
Huang, S; Hwang, MH; Mok, MS; Pang, WW, 1998
)
0.93
"Pretreatment with fentanyl (50 or 500 ng/mL) did not alter the amplitude of the CA 1 population spike before anoxia, nor did it alter the recovery of this response after 5,6, or 7 min of anoxia."( The effect of fentanyl on electrophysiologic recovery of CA 1 pyramidal cells from anoxia in the rat hippocampal slice.
Charchaflieh, J; Cottrell, JE; Kass, IS, 1998
)
0.98
"Pretreatment with fentanyl significantly and dose-dependently suppressed the number of Fos positive cells in both the Vi/Vc transitional region and Vc (P < 0.05, ANOVA)."( The effect of fentanyl on c-fos expression in the trigeminal brainstem complex produced by pulpal heat stimulation in the ferret.
Chattipakorn, SC; Light, AR; Maixner, W; Närhi, M; Willcockson, HH, 1999
)
0.99
"Treatment with fentanyl 740 nmol litre-1 improved post-ischaemic mechanical function, assessed as developed pressure, +dP/dtmax and -dP/dtmin, compared with controls after 60 min of reperfusion."( Fentanyl protects the heart against ischaemic injury via opioid receptors, adenosine A1 receptors and KATP channel linked mechanisms in rats.
Foëx, P; Kato, R; Ross, S, 2000
)
2.09
"Pretreatment with fentanyl showed the most profound suppression of c-Fos expression (P <0.01)."( Intrathecal pre-administration of fentanyl effectively suppresses formalin evoked c-Fos expression in spinal cord of rat.
Nakamura, T; Takasaki, M, 2001
)
0.91
"Pretreatment of fentanyl and fiberoptic intubation might be recommended for avoiding hyperdynamic responses."( Fentanyl attenuates the hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation more than the response to laryngoscopy.
Adachi, YU; Higuchi, H; Satomoto, M; Watanabe, K, 2002
)
2.09
"Treatment with fentanyl as well as phentolamine protected alpha-adrenergic receptors from persistent blockade by phenoxybenzamine."( Alpha-adrenergic blocking action of fentanyl on the isolated aorta of the rabbit.
Hatano, Y; Toda, N, 1977
)
0.87
"Pretreatment with fentanyl resulted in prolonged apnoea in all eight patients compared with three of nine patients in the control group."( Pharmacokinetic interaction of propofol and fentanyl: single bolus injection study.
Gill, SS; Reilly, CS; Wright, EM, 1990
)
0.86
"Pretreatment with fentanyl resulted in prolonged apnoea in four patients."( Pharmacokinetics of propofol in female patients. Studies using single bolus injections.
Briggs, LP; Cockshott, ID; Douglas, EJ; White, M, 1987
)
0.6

Toxicity

Intravenous fentanyl caused clinically meaningful pain reduction in most patients and was safe in the hands of ambulance personnel. By early 2021, MADDS detected shifts in cocaine purity, alerted communities of a new toxic fe.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Sufentanil (R 30 730), N-[4-methoxymethyl)-1-[2-(2-thienyl)ethyl]-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenylpropanamide, is a chemically novel, highly potent and extremely safe intravenous morphine-like agent in laboratory animals."( Sufentanil, a very potent and extremely safe intravenous morphine-like compound in mice, rats and dogs.
Janssen, PA; Niemegeers, CJ; Schellekens, KH; Van Bever, WF, 1976
)
0.26
"A simplified, safe and flexible technique of anesthesia, based on a limited number of relatively cheap drugs, and allowing ventilation with air, was applied to 60 patients undergoing operations of at least 60 minutes' duration."( A simple, cheap, effective and safe procedure for general anesthesia.
Lelkens, JP, 1976
)
0.26
"Metoclopramide administered before induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery appears to significantly reduce both pre- and postdelivery emetic symptoms without apparent adverse effects on mother or neonate."( The antiemetic efficacy and safety of prophylactic metoclopramide for elective cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia.
Bader, AM; Datta, S; Lussos, SA; Thornhill, ML,
)
0.13
" We conclude that fentanyl is a safe drug for use in the ED."( The safety of fentanyl use in the emergency department.
Borron, SW; Chudnofsky, CR; Dronen, SC; Wright, MB; Wright, SW, 1989
)
0.97
"To determine which of atracurium or vecuronium is associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular and pulmonary events in high-risk patients, the authors administered these drugs to patients with known asthma."( Atracurium versus vecuronium in asthmatic patients. A blinded, randomized comparison of adverse events.
Caldwell, JE; Fisher, DM; Lau, M, 1995
)
0.29
"1 mg/kg vecuronium over 5-10 s, and a blinded observer recorded cardiovascular, pulmonary, and cutaneous signs of adverse reactions for 6 min."( Atracurium versus vecuronium in asthmatic patients. A blinded, randomized comparison of adverse events.
Caldwell, JE; Fisher, DM; Lau, M, 1995
)
0.29
" The incidence of noncardiovascular adverse events (increase in peak airway pressure > 5 cmH2O, tidal volume decrease > 10%, rashes, and wheezing) did not differ between atracurium (17%) and vecuronium (7%)."( Atracurium versus vecuronium in asthmatic patients. A blinded, randomized comparison of adverse events.
Caldwell, JE; Fisher, DM; Lau, M, 1995
)
0.29
"The authors conclude that, in patients with asthma, adverse cardiovascular events are more common with atracurium than with vecuronium."( Atracurium versus vecuronium in asthmatic patients. A blinded, randomized comparison of adverse events.
Caldwell, JE; Fisher, DM; Lau, M, 1995
)
0.29
"The study was designed to compare analgesic efficacy and associated adverse effects between a group of parturients receiving subarachnoid opioids via the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique with a group receiving epidural analgesia alone for labor."( Subarachnoid morphine and fentanyl for labor analgesia. Efficacy and adverse effects.
Caldwell, LE; Rosen, MA; Shnider, SM,
)
0.43
" We observed no adverse clinical effects in elk receiving < or = 500 mg naltrexone/mg carfentanil."( Efficacy and safety of naltrexone hydrochloride for antagonizing carfentanil citrate immobilization in captive Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni).
Lance, WR; Miller, MW; Wild, MA, 1996
)
0.29
"(1) To investigate changes in arterial oxygen saturation via pulse oximeter (SpO2) during apnea and after reinstitution of manual ventilation at SpO2 of 95% or 90% following rapid sequence induction of anesthesia in children after 2-minute preoxygenation; (2) to determine whether the setting of a safe threshold of apneic period to an SpO2 of 95% is appropriate in children during anesthetic induction; and (3) to evaluate the influences of age, body weight, and height on the time from the start of apnea to SpO2 of 95%."( Study of the safe threshold of apneic period in children during anesthesia induction.
An, G; Deng, XM; Liao, X; Luo, LK; Tong, SY; Xue, FS, 1996
)
0.29
"The safe threshold of an apneic period setting to an SpO2 of 95% was appropriate in children during anesthesia induction."( Study of the safe threshold of apneic period in children during anesthesia induction.
An, G; Deng, XM; Liao, X; Luo, LK; Tong, SY; Xue, FS, 1996
)
0.29
"Sedation of children can be done in a safe and highly efficacious manner in a hospital radiology department using a structured sedation program modeled after the guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics."( Safety and efficacy of sedation in children using a structured sedation program.
Ball, WS; Egelhoff, JC; Koch, BL; Parks, TD, 1997
)
0.3
" All perioperative adverse events were recorded."( Effects of anesthetic technique on side effects associated with fentanyl Oralet premedication.
Green, W; Huntington, J; Malviya, S; Siewert, M; Voepel-Lewis, T, 1997
)
0.54
" The incidence of adverse effects was similar in all groups; serious adverse effects did not occur."( The safety and efficacy of intrabursal oxycodone and bupivacaine in analgesia after shoulder surgery.
Kirvelä, O; Muittari, P,
)
0.13
"To assess the effect of opioid substitution (substituting one member of the opioid class for another) on the incidence and severity of adverse effects in palliative care patients who experience unacceptable, refractory adverse effects when taking an opioid drug."( Opioid substitution to reduce adverse effects in cancer pain management.
Ashby, MA; Jackson, KA; Martin, P, 1999
)
0.3
" 49 substitutions were for adverse effects."( Opioid substitution to reduce adverse effects in cancer pain management.
Ashby, MA; Jackson, KA; Martin, P, 1999
)
0.3
"We found that the incidence and severity of adverse effects differed between opioids in the same patient."( Opioid substitution to reduce adverse effects in cancer pain management.
Ashby, MA; Jackson, KA; Martin, P, 1999
)
0.3
" No adverse hemodynamic effects of amiodarone were identified."( An assessment of the safety of short-term amiodarone therapy in cardiac surgical patients with fentanyl-isoflurane anesthesia.
Dunn, A; Felton, K; Freeman-Bosco, L; Giri, S; Kluger, J; Tsikouris, J; Waberski, W; White, CM, 1999
)
0.52
"To determine the adverse event and complication rate for the use of procedural sedation and analgesia for painful procedures and diagnostic imaging studies performed in a pediatric emergency department."( Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Krauss, B; Peña, BM, 1999
)
0.3
" Adverse events and complications were recorded."( Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Krauss, B; Peña, BM, 1999
)
0.3
"3%) experienced adverse events, which included oxygen desaturation less than 90% requiring intervention (10 patients) [supplemental oxygen (9), bag-mask ventilation (1)], paradoxical reactions (7), emesis (3), paradoxical reaction and oxygen desaturation requiring supplemental oxygen (2), apnea requiring bag-mask ventilation (1), laryngospasm requiring bag-mask ventilation (1), bradycardia (1), stridor and emesis (1) and oxygen desaturation requiring bag-mask ventilation with subsequent emesis (1)."( Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Krauss, B; Peña, BM, 1999
)
0.3
" The main side effect was pruritus."( Combined spinal epidural for labour analgesia--duration, efficacy and side effects of adding sufentanil or fentanyl to bupivacaine intrathecally vs plain bupivacaine.
Chen, LH; Chong, JL; Lo, WK, 1999
)
0.52
" No systemic adverse events were noted; two patients reported nasal itching or discomfort on first use that disappeared with repeated use."( An assessment of the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of intranasal fentanyl citrate in the management of cancer-related breakthrough pain: a pilot study.
Zeppetella, G, 2000
)
0.54
" Patient demographics, the amount of fentanyl administered, the level of analgesia achieved, and the incidence of adverse effects were analyzed."( The efficacy and safety of fentanyl for the management of severe procedural pain in patients with burn injuries.
Burd, RS; Linneman, PK; Terry, BE,
)
0.7
" Pharmacological strategies used in outpatient dental settings must be both safe and effective."( Comparing efficacy and safety of four intravenous sedation regimens in dental outpatients.
Beirne, OR; Dionne, RA; Gonty, A; Moore, PA; Yagiela, JA; Zuniga, J, 2001
)
0.31
"These data provide evidence that the drugs and doses evaluated resulted in therapeutic benefit to dental outpatients, with minimal incidence of potentially serious adverse effects."( Comparing efficacy and safety of four intravenous sedation regimens in dental outpatients.
Beirne, OR; Dionne, RA; Gonty, A; Moore, PA; Yagiela, JA; Zuniga, J, 2001
)
0.31
"To identify rates of adverse events associated with the use of conscious sedation in interventional radiology."( Safety of conscious sedation in interventional radiology.
Arepally, A; Kirkwood, S; Oechsle, D; Savader, SJ,
)
0.13
" Adverse events were categorized as respiratory, sedative, or major adverse events."( Safety of conscious sedation in interventional radiology.
Arepally, A; Kirkwood, S; Oechsle, D; Savader, SJ,
)
0.13
"The frequency of adverse events is low with the use of conscious sedation during interventional procedures."( Safety of conscious sedation in interventional radiology.
Arepally, A; Kirkwood, S; Oechsle, D; Savader, SJ,
)
0.13
" Common adverse events associated with OTFC were somnolence (9%), constipation (8%), nausea (8%), dizziness (8%), and vomiting (5%)."( Long-term safety of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for breakthrough cancer pain.
Berris, R; Busch, MA; Coluzzi, P; Hart, L; Loseth, DB; Lyss, A; Nordbrook, E; Payne, R; Portenoy, RK; Rauck, R; Simmonds, M, 2001
)
0.58
" Both remifentanil and fentanyl were well-tolerated, with reported adverse events typical of mu-opioid agonists."( Remifentanil and fentanyl during anaesthesia for major abdominal and gynaecological surgery. An open, comparative study of safety and efficacy.
Appelgren, L; Camu, F; Doenicke, A; Helmers, JH; Holgersen, O; Mann, C; Noronha, D; Sneyd, JR; Upadhyaya, BK, 2001
)
0.96
" Various strategies have been proposed to estimate safe and effective starting doses of methadone when rotating from morphine and hydromorphone; however, there are no guidelines for estimating safe and effective starting doses of methadone when rotating from fentanyl."( Intravenous methadone in the management of chronic cancer pain: safe and effective starting doses when substituting methadone for fentanyl.
Fischberg, DJ; Khojainova, N; Kornick, C; Manfredi, P; Payne, R; Primavera, LH; Santiago-Palma, J, 2001
)
0.7
"1 mg/hour of methadone may be safe and effective."( Intravenous methadone in the management of chronic cancer pain: safe and effective starting doses when substituting methadone for fentanyl.
Fischberg, DJ; Khojainova, N; Kornick, C; Manfredi, P; Payne, R; Primavera, LH; Santiago-Palma, J, 2001
)
0.52
" No adverse effects suggesting the discontinuation of the study were reported."( Use of TTS fentanyl as a single opioid for cancer pain relief: a safety and efficacy clinical trial in patients naive to mild or strong opioids.
Befon, S; Dardoufas, K; Georgaki, S; Mystakidou, K; Tsilika, E; Vlahos, L, 2002
)
0.7
"Analgesic treatment with TTS fentanyl used as a single opioid is effective and safe for cancer pain relief, given that is cautiously applied, in patients requiring strong opioid analgesics even if they were naive to strong or mild opioids."( Use of TTS fentanyl as a single opioid for cancer pain relief: a safety and efficacy clinical trial in patients naive to mild or strong opioids.
Befon, S; Dardoufas, K; Georgaki, S; Mystakidou, K; Tsilika, E; Vlahos, L, 2002
)
1
" Overall, the incidence of adverse events was similar but greater in the remifentanil group with respect to shivering (P<0."( Comparative efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in 'fast track' coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized, double-blind study.
Blake, D; Demeyere, R; Dybvik, T; Herregods, L; Kirnö, K; MacAdams, C; Moerman, A; Möllhoff, T; Shaikh, S, 2001
)
0.56
"To determine the incidence of adverse events related to an endoscopy sedation regimen that included propofol, delivered by general practitioner (GP) sedationists."( Sedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioner sedationists.
Chiragakis, L; Clarke, AC; Hillman, LC; Kaye, GL, 2002
)
0.31
"Audit of reports of sedation-related adverse events in patients undergoing endoscopy."( Sedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioner sedationists.
Chiragakis, L; Clarke, AC; Hillman, LC; Kaye, GL, 2002
)
0.31
" There were 185 sedation-related adverse events (6."( Sedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioner sedationists.
Chiragakis, L; Clarke, AC; Hillman, LC; Kaye, GL, 2002
)
0.31
"The GP sedationists encountered a low incidence of adverse events, which they managed effectively."( Sedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioner sedationists.
Chiragakis, L; Clarke, AC; Hillman, LC; Kaye, GL, 2002
)
0.31
" We suggest that intravenous ketorolac combined with midazolam is a safe and effective anesthetic regiment for ESWL, particularly on ambulatory basis."( Effects of intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl combined with midazolam on analgesia and side effects during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Cherng, CH; Ho, ST; Wong, CS; Yang, CP, 2002
)
0.59
"To compare the frequency of adverse effects of remifentanil and fentanyl in a large and diverse patient population."( A comparison of the remifentanil and fentanyl adverse effect profile in a multicenter phase IV study.
Fleisher, LA; Joshi, GP; Twersky, RS; Warner, DS, 2002
)
0.83
", opioid-related) adverse effects were recorded."( A comparison of the remifentanil and fentanyl adverse effect profile in a multicenter phase IV study.
Fleisher, LA; Joshi, GP; Twersky, RS; Warner, DS, 2002
)
0.59
" There were no significant differences between the two drugs with respect to other adverse events (i."( A comparison of the remifentanil and fentanyl adverse effect profile in a multicenter phase IV study.
Fleisher, LA; Joshi, GP; Twersky, RS; Warner, DS, 2002
)
0.59
"In the doses used, both remifentanil and fentanyl have a similar frequency of adverse effects except for the higher frequency of hypotension associated with the use of remifentanil."( A comparison of the remifentanil and fentanyl adverse effect profile in a multicenter phase IV study.
Fleisher, LA; Joshi, GP; Twersky, RS; Warner, DS, 2002
)
0.85
" They were followed up to 3 months postoperatively only to fail to detect any adverse events related directly to this method of anesthesia."( [A clinical study of total intravenous anesthesia by using mainly propofol, fentanyl and ketamine--with special reference to its safety based on 26,079 cases].
Hashimoto, H; Hirota, K; Ishihara, H; Koh, H; Kotani, N; Matsuki, A; Muraoka, M; Nagao, H; Sakai, T; Sato, Y; Takahashi, S; Tsubo, T; Wakayama, S, 2002
)
0.54
" Because concern about delayed adverse effects commonly delays discharge after sedation, we attempted to establish the timing of adverse effects in our cohort of procedural sedations."( When is a patient safe for discharge after procedural sedation? The timing of adverse effect events in 1367 pediatric procedural sedations.
Azer, MM; Newman, DH; Pitetti, RD; Singh, S, 2003
)
0.32
" We determined the timing of serious (eg, hypoxia, stridor, hypotension) and other adverse effects from final medication administration and calculated adverse effect risk ratios in relation to sedation characteristics."( When is a patient safe for discharge after procedural sedation? The timing of adverse effect events in 1367 pediatric procedural sedations.
Azer, MM; Newman, DH; Pitetti, RD; Singh, S, 2003
)
0.32
"7%) adverse effects, of which 159 (11."( When is a patient safe for discharge after procedural sedation? The timing of adverse effect events in 1367 pediatric procedural sedations.
Azer, MM; Newman, DH; Pitetti, RD; Singh, S, 2003
)
0.32
"Adverse effects were common; however, serious adverse effects rarely occurred after 25 minutes from the final medication administration."( When is a patient safe for discharge after procedural sedation? The timing of adverse effect events in 1367 pediatric procedural sedations.
Azer, MM; Newman, DH; Pitetti, RD; Singh, S, 2003
)
0.32
" We characterize the fasting status of patients receiving procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric ED and assess the relationship between fasting status and adverse events."( Preprocedural fasting state and adverse events in children undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Agrawal, D; Gupta, R; Krauss, B; Manzi, SF, 2003
)
0.32
" Preprocedural fasting state and adverse events were recorded."( Preprocedural fasting state and adverse events in children undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Agrawal, D; Gupta, R; Krauss, B; Manzi, SF, 2003
)
0.32
" Seventy-seven adverse events occurred in 68 (6."( Preprocedural fasting state and adverse events in children undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Agrawal, D; Gupta, R; Krauss, B; Manzi, SF, 2003
)
0.32
" There was no association between preprocedural fasting state and adverse events."( Preprocedural fasting state and adverse events in children undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.
Agrawal, D; Gupta, R; Krauss, B; Manzi, SF, 2003
)
0.32
"We conclude that stepwise sedation is effective and safe in haemodialysis patients and leads to a complete amnesia for the procedure."( Stepwise sedation is safe and effective for the insertion of central venous catheters.
Bosch, FH; Schiltmans, SK, 2004
)
0.32
" Atropine and diazepam in the premedication, propofol and fentanyl during induction, muscle relaxation facilitation by vecuronium, and sevoflurane or isoflurane for maintenance seem to be a safe general anesthetic choice for analgesic intolerant patients with and without asthma."( General anesthesia and postoperative pain management in analgesic intolerant patients with/without asthma: is it safe?
Basgül, E; Bozkurt, B; Celiker, V; Kalyoncu, AF; Karakaya, G; Oguzalp, H,
)
0.38
" The safety was evaluated by monitoring the patient's clinical conditions and adverse events."( Evaluation of safety and efficacy of transdermal therapeutic system-fentanyl in adult patients with gynecological cancer-related pain.
Cheewakriangkrai, C; Katanyoo, K; Lorvidhaya, V; Srisomboon, J; Suprapaphorn, P, 2004
)
0.56
" The most frequent adverse events were mild nausea or vomiting (46%) and constipation (33%)."( Evaluation of safety and efficacy of transdermal therapeutic system-fentanyl in adult patients with gynecological cancer-related pain.
Cheewakriangkrai, C; Katanyoo, K; Lorvidhaya, V; Srisomboon, J; Suprapaphorn, P, 2004
)
0.56
"The results suggest that TTS-fentanyl is safe and effective in managing chronic gynecological cancer-related pain."( Evaluation of safety and efficacy of transdermal therapeutic system-fentanyl in adult patients with gynecological cancer-related pain.
Cheewakriangkrai, C; Katanyoo, K; Lorvidhaya, V; Srisomboon, J; Suprapaphorn, P, 2004
)
0.85
" Analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil was very effective, well tolerated and had a similar adverse event and haemodynamic profile to those of hypnotic-based regimens when used in critically ill neuro-intensive care unit patients for up to 5 days."( Safety and efficacy of analgesia-based sedation with remifentanil versus standard hypnotic-based regimens in intensive care unit patients with brain injuries: a randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN50308308].
Karabinis, A; Kirkham, AJ; Komnos, A; Mandragos, K; Soukup, J; Speelberg, B; Stergiopoulos, S, 2004
)
0.32
" The safety analysis evaluated the incidence of adverse events (AEs) reported within the first 28 days of treatment with TDF or SRM."( Efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl and sustained-release oral morphine in patients with cancer and chronic non-cancer pain.
Ahmedzai, SH; Allan, LG; Camacho, F; Clark, AJ; Horbay, GL; Richarz, U; Simpson, K, 2004
)
0.6
" The BIS offers an objective, safe and reliable measure of sedation, without disturbing either patient or operator."( Bispectral index monitoring for conscious sedation in intervention: better, safer, faster.
Bell, JK; England, RE; Laasch, HU; Martin, DF; Morris, JA; Wilbraham, L, 2004
)
0.32
"The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether epidural fentanyl-bupivacaine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was more efficacious and had fewer adverse effects than epidural or intravenous morphine PCA."( Efficacy and adverse effects of patient-controlled epidural or intravenous analgesia after major surgery.
Hu, JS; Liew, C; Lui, PW; Teng, YH; Tsai, SK, 2004
)
0.55
" Adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, sedation, motor block, and respiratory depression (< 8 breaths per minute) were recorded."( Efficacy and adverse effects of patient-controlled epidural or intravenous analgesia after major surgery.
Hu, JS; Liew, C; Lui, PW; Teng, YH; Tsai, SK, 2004
)
0.32
" There were no differences in other adverse events such as urinary retention, sedation, and motor block among the three groups."( Efficacy and adverse effects of patient-controlled epidural or intravenous analgesia after major surgery.
Hu, JS; Liew, C; Lui, PW; Teng, YH; Tsai, SK, 2004
)
0.32
" It is considered safe to use continuous epidural PCA with fentanyl-bupivacaine in patients receiving major elective surgery."( Efficacy and adverse effects of patient-controlled epidural or intravenous analgesia after major surgery.
Hu, JS; Liew, C; Lui, PW; Teng, YH; Tsai, SK, 2004
)
0.57
"To compare the frequency and severity of adverse events associated with parenteral drugs commonly used for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in a pediatric emergency department."( Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs.
Bajaj, L; Bothner, JP; Roback, MG; Wathen, JE, 2005
)
0.33
" A total of 458 adverse events were observed in 426 patients (17%)."( Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs.
Bajaj, L; Bothner, JP; Roback, MG; Wathen, JE, 2005
)
0.33
"Drug types used in pediatric PSA are associated with different adverse event profiles."( Adverse events associated with procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department: a comparison of common parenteral drugs.
Bajaj, L; Bothner, JP; Roback, MG; Wathen, JE, 2005
)
0.33
"The aim of the study was to evaluate adverse events related to the use of anesthesia and anesthetic procedures associated with interventional radiology."( Adverse effects of anesthesia in interventional radiology.
Derbent, A; Memiş, A; Oran, I; Parildar, M; Uyar, M; Yurtseven, T, 2005
)
0.33
"Interventional radiological procedures seem to be safe from an anesthesiologist's point of view."( Adverse effects of anesthesia in interventional radiology.
Derbent, A; Memiş, A; Oran, I; Parildar, M; Uyar, M; Yurtseven, T, 2005
)
0.33
" Safety was assessed by recording the advent of adverse events and efficacy by the evaluating the intensity of breakthrough pain."( [Safety and efficacy of oral trans-mucosal fentanyl citrate in the long-term treatment of breakthrough pain in oncology patients: the ECODIR study].
Camps Herrero, C; Carulla Torrent, J; Cassinello Espinosa, J; Dorta Delgado, J; Jara Sánchez, C; Moreno Nogueira, JA; Valentín Maganto, V, 2005
)
0.59
" All adverse reactions reported were mild or moderate."( [Safety and efficacy of oral trans-mucosal fentanyl citrate in the long-term treatment of breakthrough pain in oncology patients: the ECODIR study].
Camps Herrero, C; Carulla Torrent, J; Cassinello Espinosa, J; Dorta Delgado, J; Jara Sánchez, C; Moreno Nogueira, JA; Valentín Maganto, V, 2005
)
0.59
"Regardless of the clinical scenario in which they are administered, opioids can have adverse effects in infants and children."( Adverse effects following the inadvertent administration of opioids to infants and children.
Meyer, D; Tobias, JD,
)
0.13
" There were a total of 70 patients who had 77 adverse events."( Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the first 7 years of office practice.
Rodgers, SF, 2005
)
0.33
"The administration of intravenous sedation by the operating surgeon for outpatient oral surgery procedures is safe and results in a low incidence of adverse events."( Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the first 7 years of office practice.
Rodgers, SF, 2005
)
0.33
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" The adverse events associated with this moderate sedation were assessed."( Safety and effectiveness of moderate sedation for radiologic non-vascular intervention.
Kim, TH,
)
0.13
"Moderate sedation allows performance of safe and effective radiologic non-vascular intervention, and it is also easy for an interventional radiologist to use."( Safety and effectiveness of moderate sedation for radiologic non-vascular intervention.
Kim, TH,
)
0.13
" Abdominal adverse effects of opioid analgesics are constipation and increased pressure in the biliary system."( Prospective sonographic evaluation of fentanyl side effects on the neonatal gallbladder.
Benz-Bohm, G; Roth, B; Schmidt, B; Stützer, H, 2006
)
0.6
" Further investigations are required to assess adverse gastrointestinal effects."( Prospective sonographic evaluation of fentanyl side effects on the neonatal gallbladder.
Benz-Bohm, G; Roth, B; Schmidt, B; Stützer, H, 2006
)
0.6
"PCA plus BI with fentanyl administered by intravenous route is a safe and efficacious method for analgesia in children with moderate to severe cancer pain."( Safety and efficacy of fentanyl administered by patient controlled analgesia in children with cancer pain.
Barone, G; Chiaretti, A; Lazzareschi, I; Liotti, L; Riccardi, R; Ruggiero, A, 2007
)
0.99
" The adverse event (AE) rate was 18% and included apnea (10%), inadequate sedation (3%), bradycardia (2%), desaturation (1%), hypotension (1%) and bag-valve-mask use (1%)."( Emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: A Canadian Community Effectiveness and Safety Study (ACCESS).
Mensour, M; Michaud, J; Pineau, R; Sahai, V, 2006
)
0.33
"Procedural sedation was safe and effective in our environment."( Emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: A Canadian Community Effectiveness and Safety Study (ACCESS).
Mensour, M; Michaud, J; Pineau, R; Sahai, V, 2006
)
0.33
"2% of patients experienced adverse events that were either probably related or very likely to be related to the study drug."( Safety and efficacy of transdermal fentanyl in patients with cancer pain: phase IV, Turkish oncology group trial.
Aliustaoğlu, M; Altinbaş, M; Altundağ, K; Atahan, L; Cooper, R; Demirkan, B; Kömürcü, S; Manavoğlu, O; Ozdemir, F; Ozkök, S; Pak, Y; Sarihan, S; Turhal, S; Turna, HS; Yavuz, AA; Yaylaci, M, 2007
)
0.62
" The recorded information included demographic, medication, and adverse event data."( Safety of intravenous midazolam and fentanyl for pediatric GI endoscopy: prospective study of 1578 endoscopies.
Cook-Sather, SD; Farace, L; Garofolo, M; Lachewitz, G; Liacouras, CA; Lombardi, S; Mamula, P; Markowitz, JE; Morgan, V; Neiswender, K; Nieberle, M; Puma, A; Sargent-Harkins, L; Trautwein, A; Wood, S; Zimmerman, A, 2007
)
0.61
"Description of adverse events relating to intravenous sedation."( Safety of intravenous midazolam and fentanyl for pediatric GI endoscopy: prospective study of 1578 endoscopies.
Cook-Sather, SD; Farace, L; Garofolo, M; Lachewitz, G; Liacouras, CA; Lombardi, S; Mamula, P; Markowitz, JE; Morgan, V; Neiswender, K; Nieberle, M; Puma, A; Sargent-Harkins, L; Trautwein, A; Wood, S; Zimmerman, A, 2007
)
0.61
" Serious adverse events (apnea) were noted in 2 patients (0."( Safety of intravenous midazolam and fentanyl for pediatric GI endoscopy: prospective study of 1578 endoscopies.
Cook-Sather, SD; Farace, L; Garofolo, M; Lachewitz, G; Liacouras, CA; Lombardi, S; Mamula, P; Markowitz, JE; Morgan, V; Neiswender, K; Nieberle, M; Puma, A; Sargent-Harkins, L; Trautwein, A; Wood, S; Zimmerman, A, 2007
)
0.61
"Intravenous sedation with midazolam and fentanyl is safe for pediatric GI endoscopy."( Safety of intravenous midazolam and fentanyl for pediatric GI endoscopy: prospective study of 1578 endoscopies.
Cook-Sather, SD; Farace, L; Garofolo, M; Lachewitz, G; Liacouras, CA; Lombardi, S; Mamula, P; Markowitz, JE; Morgan, V; Neiswender, K; Nieberle, M; Puma, A; Sargent-Harkins, L; Trautwein, A; Wood, S; Zimmerman, A, 2007
)
0.88
" In this limited sample, extending the infusion period from the presently approved 48 hours to 96 hours seems to be a safe alternative and/or adjunct to standard opiate analgesia after colorectal surgery using a right lateral transverse incision, hence reducing the incidence of opiate adverse effects and enhancing recovery."( Safety of 96-hour incision-site continuous infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after bowel cancer resection.
Corso, OH; Hewett, PJ; Karatassas, A; Morris, RG, 2007
)
0.34
" No adverse events were reported in the Fentanyl group, while in the Midazolam group a decrease in oxygen saturation was noted in 23/60 (35%) patients."( Single use of fentanyl in colonoscopy is safe and effective and significantly shortens recovery time.
Bakaloudis, T; Chatzopoulos, D; Dokas, S; Gavalas, E; Kountouras, J; Lazaraki, G; Metallidis, S; Zavos, C, 2007
)
0.97
"Respiratory depression is a serious and potentially life-threatening side-effect of opioid therapy."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the effectiveness and safety of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats.
Dahan, A; Danhof, M; Kan, J; Olofsen, E; Yassen, A, 2008
)
0.57
"54 suggesting that buprenorphine is a relatively safe opioid."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the effectiveness and safety of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats.
Dahan, A; Danhof, M; Kan, J; Olofsen, E; Yassen, A, 2008
)
0.57
" Pain intensity, relative dosing ratios, discontinuation rates, and adverse events were assessed."( The safety and efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: an analysis of pooled data from three randomized, active-controlled clinical studies.
Damaraju, CV; Hewitt, DJ; Kershaw, P; Siccardi, M; Viscusi, ER, 2007
)
0.64
" Discontinuation rates and the incidence of adverse events were similar between groups."( The safety and efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: an analysis of pooled data from three randomized, active-controlled clinical studies.
Damaraju, CV; Hewitt, DJ; Kershaw, P; Siccardi, M; Viscusi, ER, 2007
)
0.64
" MAIN ENDPOINTS: a) time to sedoanalgesia and recovery, length for invasive procedure and stay in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; b) mean dose of drug; c) sedoanalgesic grade and amnesia related to invasive procedure and d) adverse events."( [Safety and effectiveness of the sedoanalgesia with fentanyl and propofol. Experience in a pediatric intensive medicine unit].
Consuegra, E; González, R; López, JM; Morón, A; Pérez, O; Urquía, L; Valerón, M, 2007
)
0.59
" Commonly occurring adverse events were similar between groups."( Efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine for pain management following abdominal or pelvic surgery.
Damaraju, CV; Gargiulo, K; Hewitt, DJ; Minkowitz, HS; Rathmell, JP; Vallow, S,
)
0.43
"This analysis of safety and tolerability data revealed common treatment-related adverse events: nausea, vomiting, headache, and erythema."( The safety and tolerability of the fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system: an alternative to currently available analgesic modalities.
Eberhart, L,
)
0.41
"Assisted sedation is a safe and easy method for pain free PVP procedures."( Assisted sedation: a safe and easy method for pain-free percutaneous vertebroplasty.
Andreula, C; Della Puppa, A; Frass, M, 2008
)
0.35
"To assess the adverse effects of transdermal opiates treating moderate-severe cancer pain in comparison with slow release oral morphine."( Adverse effects of transdermal opiates treating moderate-severe cancer pain in comparison to long-acting morphine: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.
Maltoni, M; Raffaeli, W; Sartori, S; Scarpi, E; Tamburini, E; Tassinari, D; Tombesi, P, 2008
)
0.35
" The primary end point was the overall adverse effects odds ratio (OR); secondary end points were the overall gastrointestinal adverse effects, constipation, nausea, somnolence, patients' preference, and trial withdrawal."( Adverse effects of transdermal opiates treating moderate-severe cancer pain in comparison to long-acting morphine: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.
Maltoni, M; Raffaeli, W; Sartori, S; Scarpi, E; Tamburini, E; Tassinari, D; Tombesi, P, 2008
)
0.35
" No significant differences were observed for overall adverse effects, overall gastrointestinal adverse effects, overall neurologic adverse effects, nausea, somnolence, hypoventilation, trial withdrawal, and changes in opiate treatments."( Adverse effects of transdermal opiates treating moderate-severe cancer pain in comparison to long-acting morphine: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.
Maltoni, M; Raffaeli, W; Sartori, S; Scarpi, E; Tamburini, E; Tassinari, D; Tombesi, P, 2008
)
0.35
"Although no difference in the overall adverse effect profile exists between transdermal opiates and slow release oral morphine, the difference in some adverse effects (mainly constipation) seems to favor transdermal opiates in the preference of patients with moderate-severe cancer pain."( Adverse effects of transdermal opiates treating moderate-severe cancer pain in comparison to long-acting morphine: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.
Maltoni, M; Raffaeli, W; Sartori, S; Scarpi, E; Tamburini, E; Tassinari, D; Tombesi, P, 2008
)
0.35
"To determine anesthetic profiles and adverse events in practice of ambulatory anesthesia for elective surgery in different levels of hospitals across Thailand."( The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI study) of ambulatory anesthesia: II. Anesthetic profiles and adverse events.
Chau-in, W; Punjasawadwong, Y; Srisawasdi, S; Taratarnkoolwatana, K; Vasinanukorn, M; Werawatganon, T, 2008
)
0.35
" Other adverse events included awareness (1."( The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI study) of ambulatory anesthesia: II. Anesthetic profiles and adverse events.
Chau-in, W; Punjasawadwong, Y; Srisawasdi, S; Taratarnkoolwatana, K; Vasinanukorn, M; Werawatganon, T, 2008
)
0.35
"The incidence of major adverse events was low in ambulatory anesthesia for elective surgery when compared to the incidence in general surgical population."( The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI study) of ambulatory anesthesia: II. Anesthetic profiles and adverse events.
Chau-in, W; Punjasawadwong, Y; Srisawasdi, S; Taratarnkoolwatana, K; Vasinanukorn, M; Werawatganon, T, 2008
)
0.35
" The occurrence of adverse events and changes in laboratory tests were evaluated as safety variables."( Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic study of a novel fentanyl-containing matrix transdermal patch system in Japanese patients with cancer pain.
Hanaoka, K; Hosokawa, T; Ishida, T; Kitajima, T; Mashimo, S; Miyazaki, T; Namiki, A; Nogami, S; Ogawa, S, 2008
)
0.59
" A total of 316 adverse events occurred in 78 (90."( Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic study of a novel fentanyl-containing matrix transdermal patch system in Japanese patients with cancer pain.
Hanaoka, K; Hosokawa, T; Ishida, T; Kitajima, T; Mashimo, S; Miyazaki, T; Namiki, A; Nogami, S; Ogawa, S, 2008
)
0.59
" The patch tested was well tolerated and its use did not result in any increased incidence of adverse drug reactions over those commonly found with opioid analgesics."( Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic study of a novel fentanyl-containing matrix transdermal patch system in Japanese patients with cancer pain.
Hanaoka, K; Hosokawa, T; Ishida, T; Kitajima, T; Mashimo, S; Miyazaki, T; Namiki, A; Nogami, S; Ogawa, S, 2008
)
0.59
" Any adverse events were recorded; four tolerability endpoints, constipation, nausea, daytime drowsiness, and sleeping disturbances, were assessed daily."( A randomized, open, parallel group, multicenter trial to investigate analgesic efficacy and safety of a new transdermal fentanyl patch compared to standard opioid treatment in cancer pain.
Heiskanen, T; Hoerauf, KH; Jensen, NH; Krenn, H; Kress, HG; Lundorff, L; Nolte, T; Petersen, R; Rosland, JH; Sabatowski, R; Saedder, EA; Von der Laage, D, 2008
)
0.55
"We sought to determine whether the combination of propofol and fentanyl results in lower propofol doses and fewer adverse cardiopulmonary events than propofol and placebo for lumbar puncture in children with acute hematologic malignancies."( Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events.
Christenson, DK; Eickhoff, JC; Hollman, GA; Schultz, MM, 2008
)
1
" Data collected included patient age and diagnosis, propofol dose and adverse events."( Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events.
Christenson, DK; Eickhoff, JC; Hollman, GA; Schultz, MM, 2008
)
0.76
" Twelve adverse events occurred in 11 of 22 patients (50."( Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events.
Christenson, DK; Eickhoff, JC; Hollman, GA; Schultz, MM, 2008
)
0.76
" propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies resulted in lower propofol doses and fewer adverse events."( Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events.
Christenson, DK; Eickhoff, JC; Hollman, GA; Schultz, MM, 2008
)
0.76
"There are few studies on sedation medication requirements and sedation related adverse events in developmentally disabled children."( Sedation medication received and adverse events related to sedation for brain MRI in children with and without developmental disabilities.
Chen, X; Groebe, A; Kannikeswaran, N; Mahajan, PV; Sethuraman, U, 2009
)
0.35
"The objectives of our study were to compare sedation medication received and sedation related adverse events for brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between children with and without developmental disabilities."( Sedation medication received and adverse events related to sedation for brain MRI in children with and without developmental disabilities.
Chen, X; Groebe, A; Kannikeswaran, N; Mahajan, PV; Sethuraman, U, 2009
)
0.35
" Data on developmental status, demographics and details of sedation medications received along with adverse events were collected."( Sedation medication received and adverse events related to sedation for brain MRI in children with and without developmental disabilities.
Chen, X; Groebe, A; Kannikeswaran, N; Mahajan, PV; Sethuraman, U, 2009
)
0.35
" Unfortunately, constipation is a common adverse effect associated with opioid use."( Safety of enteral naloxone for the reversal of opiate-induced constipation in the intensive care unit.
Arpino, PA; Thompson, BT, 2009
)
0.35
" The results of our study suggest that preoperative ITM combined with IV-PCA may be considered as an effective and safe pain management regimen in living liver donors who have characteristics of low tolerance to pain and postoperative coagulation derangement."( Intrathecal morphine combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia is an effective and safe method for immediate postoperative pain control in live liver donors.
Ahn, HJ; Cho, HS; Choi, SJ; Gwak, MS; Hahm, TS; Joh, JW; Kim, GS; Kim, JA; Kim, KM; Ko, JS, 2009
)
0.35
" Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical and neurologic examinations, and clinical laboratory tests."( Fentanyl buccal tablet for the treatment of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic cancer pain: A long-term, open-label safety study.
Messina, J; Weinstein, SM; Xie, F, 2009
)
1.8
" In addition, no long-term fetal or neonatal effects of fentanyl were identified, with normal neonatal neurological and adaptive capacities at two hours and 24 hours after birth supporting its safe use in childbirth."( Non-axial administration of fentanyl in childbirth: a review of the efficacy and safety of fentanyl for mother and neonate.
Belan, I; Fleet, J; Jones, M, 2011
)
0.91
"in confirming the safe use of non-axial administration of fentanyl during childbirth, benefits include midwives being able to offer women an alternative option for pain relief."( Non-axial administration of fentanyl in childbirth: a review of the efficacy and safety of fentanyl for mother and neonate.
Belan, I; Fleet, J; Jones, M, 2011
)
0.91
" We suggest that the performance of peripheral foot and ankle blocks with monitored intravenous sedation appears to be a safe and useful option for ASA 3 and 4 patients undergoing limb-preservation surgery."( Safety of local anesthesia combined with monitored intravenous sedation for American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 and 4 patients undergoing lower limb-preservation procedures.
Blume, P; Gesquire, M; Kodumudi, G; Mitra, S; Shelley, K; Vadivelu, N; Xia, Y,
)
0.13
" Discontinuation rates and the incidence of adverse events were also evaluated."( Efficacy and safety of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management for patient subgroups.
Anker-Møller, E; Coluzzi, F; Mattia, C; Sonnino, D, 2010
)
0.67
" Rates of patient withdrawals and the incidence of adverse events were generally similar between treatment groups in the patient subgroups."( Efficacy and safety of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management for patient subgroups.
Anker-Møller, E; Coluzzi, F; Mattia, C; Sonnino, D, 2010
)
0.67
" A priori-defined adverse events included out-of-hospital events: respiratory rate <12 breaths/min, pulse oximetry <92%, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, any fall in Glasgow Coma Scale score, nausea or vomiting, intubation, and use of antiemetic agents or naloxone."( Effectiveness and safety of fentanyl compared with morphine for out-of-hospital analgesia.
Daya, M; Fleischman, RJ; Frazer, DG; Jui, J; Newgard, CD,
)
0.43
" Both medications had low rates of adverse events, which were easily controlled."( Effectiveness and safety of fentanyl compared with morphine for out-of-hospital analgesia.
Daya, M; Fleischman, RJ; Frazer, DG; Jui, J; Newgard, CD,
)
0.43
"5-mg patch) seems to be safe and efficient as a first-line strong opioid."( Evaluation of analgesic effect and safety of fentanyl transdermal patch for cancer pain as the first line.
Hoya, Y; Okamoto, T; Yanaga, K, 2010
)
0.62
"Study endpoints included measures of sedation depth, requirement for supplemental sedative doses, use of alternative sedatives, and the frequency and nature of treatment-emergent and sedative-related adverse events."( Safety evaluation of fospropofol for sedation during minor surgical procedures.
Berry, BD; Ekman, EF; Gan, TJ; Hardi, R; Muckerman, RC; Shore, N, 2010
)
0.36
" The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were self-limited: paresthesias (62."( Safety evaluation of fospropofol for sedation during minor surgical procedures.
Berry, BD; Ekman, EF; Gan, TJ; Hardi, R; Muckerman, RC; Shore, N, 2010
)
0.36
"5 mg/kg with supplemental doses was safe and well-tolerated as moderate sedation for use in minor surgical procedures."( Safety evaluation of fospropofol for sedation during minor surgical procedures.
Berry, BD; Ekman, EF; Gan, TJ; Hardi, R; Muckerman, RC; Shore, N, 2010
)
0.36
"Previous meta-analysis suggested that transdermal fentanyl was not inferior to sustained-release oral morphine in treating moderate-severe cancer pain with less adverse effects."( Efficacy and adverse effects of transdermal fentanyl and sustained-release oral morphine in treating moderate-severe cancer pain in Chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bi, ZF; Chen, DL; Jiang, ZM; Ma, W; Xie, DR; Yang, Q; Zhang, YD, 2010
)
0.87
" Primary end points assessed by meta-analysis were remission rate of pain and incidence of adverse effects."( Efficacy and adverse effects of transdermal fentanyl and sustained-release oral morphine in treating moderate-severe cancer pain in Chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bi, ZF; Chen, DL; Jiang, ZM; Ma, W; Xie, DR; Yang, Q; Zhang, YD, 2010
)
0.62
"Our study showed again that both transdermal fentanyl and oral morphine had the same efficacy in the treatment of moderate-severe cancer pain in Chinese population, but the former might have less adverse effects and better quality of life."( Efficacy and adverse effects of transdermal fentanyl and sustained-release oral morphine in treating moderate-severe cancer pain in Chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bi, ZF; Chen, DL; Jiang, ZM; Ma, W; Xie, DR; Yang, Q; Zhang, YD, 2010
)
0.88
"Using Medline, Embase, and the Science Citation Index, we summarize the cutaneous adverse effects of transdermal and parenteral fentanyl."( Fentanyl transdermal patches: overview of cutaneous adverse effects in humans.
Hostynek, JJ; Maibach, HI, 2010
)
2.01
"During maintenance treatment, 70 of 646 patients (11%) discontinued because of adverse events (AEs), 69 of 646 (11%) because of withdrawn consent, and 57 of 646 (9%) because of noncompliance."( Long-term safety and tolerability of fentanyl buccal tablet for the treatment of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic pain: an 18-month study.
Fine, PG; Messina, J; Rathmell, J; Xie, F, 2010
)
0.63
"FBT was generally safe and well tolerated, with self-reported functional improvement observed in most of the opioid-tolerant patients with BTP in association with chronic noncancer pain."( Long-term safety and tolerability of fentanyl buccal tablet for the treatment of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic pain: an 18-month study.
Fine, PG; Messina, J; Rathmell, J; Xie, F, 2010
)
0.63
" Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and clinically relevant respiratory depression were assessed across patient subpopulations categorized by age."( Safety and tolerability of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system: findings from a pooled data analysis of four clinical trials.
Damaraju, CV; Donnell, MT; Minkowitz, HS; Skowronski, RJ; Tonner, PH; Yarmush, J,
)
0.43
"safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse events (AEs) and by nasal tolerability assessments."( Long-term safety, tolerability, and consistency of effect of fentanyl pectin nasal spray for breakthrough cancer pain in opioid-tolerant patients.
Deka, AC; Herrera, IG; Portenoy, RK; Raffaeli, W; Sitte, T; Torres, LM; Wallace, MS,
)
0.37
" Overall, 925 (80%) enrolled patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE)."( Long-term dosing, safety, and tolerability of fentanyl buccal tablet in the management of noncancer-related breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients.
Janka, L; Nalamachu, SR; Narayana, A, 2011
)
0.63
" FBT was generally safe and well tolerated in this setting."( Long-term dosing, safety, and tolerability of fentanyl buccal tablet in the management of noncancer-related breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients.
Janka, L; Nalamachu, SR; Narayana, A, 2011
)
0.63
" Adverse events were also recorded."( The efficacy and safety of fentanyl buccal tablet compared with immediate-release oxycodone for the management of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic pain.
Ashburn, MA; Messina, J; Slevin, KA; Xie, F, 2011
)
0.67
" Adverse events with both study drugs were generally typical of opioids, and the majority occurred during titration."( The efficacy and safety of fentanyl buccal tablet compared with immediate-release oxycodone for the management of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic pain.
Ashburn, MA; Messina, J; Slevin, KA; Xie, F, 2011
)
0.67
" The adverse reactions to the 1-day formulation observed in this study were similar to those previously reported for the Durotep MT Patch (the "3-day formulation")."( [Clinical study of one-day fentanyl patch in patients with cancer pain--evaluation of the efficacy and safety in relation to treatment switch from opioid analgesic therapy].
Hanaoka, K; Sakata, H; Tomioka, T; Yoshimura, T, 2011
)
0.67
"In patients with moderate to severe cancer pain, switching of opioid analgesic therapy to 1-day formulation therapy has been shown to be safe and useful, following rotation from other opioids, for controlling cancer pain."( [Clinical study of one-day fentanyl patch in patients with cancer pain--evaluation of the efficacy and safety in relation to treatment switch from opioid analgesic therapy].
Hanaoka, K; Sakata, H; Tomioka, T; Yoshimura, T, 2011
)
0.67
"Sevoflurane is an effective and safe alternative to midazolam in ICU patients associated with a moderate increase in costs."( [Efficacy, safety and cost of sedation with sevoflurane in intensive care unit].
Arnal, JM; Bisbal, M; Corno, G; Demory, D; Donati, SY; Durand-Gasselin, J; Granier, I; Passelac, A; Sallée, M, 2011
)
0.37
" Adverse events were recorded throughout."( Sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet in daily practice: efficacy, safety and tolerability in patients with breakthrough cancer pain.
Müller-Schwefe, GH; Überall, MA, 2011
)
0.76
"5%) experiencing ≥1 study drug-related adverse event."( Sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet in daily practice: efficacy, safety and tolerability in patients with breakthrough cancer pain.
Müller-Schwefe, GH; Überall, MA, 2011
)
0.76
" There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects between the two drugs."( The effectiveness and adverse events of morphine versus fentanyl on a physician-staffed helicopter.
Cudnik, M; Emerman, CL; Pakiela, J; Smith, DA; Smith, MD; Wang, Y, 2012
)
0.63
"To provide data on the epidemiology of adverse events during sedation for endoscopy."( Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience.
Agostoni, M; Beretta, L; Fanti, L; Gemma, M; Pasculli, N; Testoni, PA, 2011
)
0.37
" Adverse events were defined as occurrences that warranted intervention and were classified as hypotension, desaturation, bradycardia, hypertension, arrhythmia, aspiration, respiratory depression, vomiting, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, angina, hypoglycemia, and/or allergic reaction."( Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience.
Agostoni, M; Beretta, L; Fanti, L; Gemma, M; Pasculli, N; Testoni, PA, 2011
)
0.37
" Adverse events were rare in both the adult (4."( Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience.
Agostoni, M; Beretta, L; Fanti, L; Gemma, M; Pasculli, N; Testoni, PA, 2011
)
0.37
"Deep sedation during endoscopic procedures is safe in both adults and children."( Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience.
Agostoni, M; Beretta, L; Fanti, L; Gemma, M; Pasculli, N; Testoni, PA, 2011
)
0.37
"57% of patients having complications (52 patients having 60 adverse events)."( Safety of intravenous sedation administered by the operating oral surgeon: the second 7 years of office practice.
Rodgers, MS; Rodgers, SF, 2011
)
0.37
" Eight patients developed adverse reactions, 3 of which required further evaluation in the emergency department."( Safety of deep sedation in an urban oral and maxillofacial surgery training program.
Braidy, HF; Singh, P; Ziccardi, VB, 2011
)
0.37
" The rate of adverse events with conscious sedation has not been previously assessed in the interventional spine procedure setting."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
"The goal of this study was to determine the rate of adverse events when using conscious sedation in the ambulatory interventional spine setting."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
"The rate and type of adverse events were analyzed and compared between those who received conscious sedation with local anesthesia and those who received local anesthesia alone."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
" Of these cases, 66 immediate adverse events (5."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
"The findings of this study suggest that mild to moderate conscious sedation in interventional spine procedures is associated with low rates of adverse events when established protocols are followed."( Adverse events of conscious sedation in ambulatory spine procedures.
Marín, DR; Schaufele, MK; Simmons, AC; Tate, JL, 2011
)
0.37
" Safety and tolerability were evaluated by adverse events (AEs) and nasal assessments."( Efficacy and safety of fentanyl pectin nasal spray compared with immediate-release morphine sulfate tablets in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy multiple-crossover study.
Davies, A; Fallon, M; Galvez, R; Kumar, K; Lux, AE; Reale, C; Stachowiak, A,
)
0.44
" The investigators conducted a review of procedural sedation forms for all pediatric and adult patients admitted to this burn center from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2005, for demographic and clinical data including patient age, gender, body weight, TBSA, dates of burn injury and wound care procedures, length of procedure, pre- and postprocedural pain assessment, procedural sedation/analgesia medications and doses, adverse drug events, and related interventions."( Efficacy and safety of procedural sedation and analgesia for burn wound care.
Andrews, DD; Christ-Libertin, C; Thompson, EM,
)
0.13
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter (ABCB1) gene product, P-glycoprotein plays an important role in the prevention of intracellular accumulation of potentially toxic substances and metabolites in various tissues."( Association between ABCB1 gene polymorphisms and fentanyl's adverse effects in Turkish patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.
Engin, AB; Kanbak, O; Karahalil, B; Kesimci, E, 2012
)
0.63
" The authors set out to prospectively assess the depth of sedation and incidence of adverse events when N(2)O and INF are used in combination in pediatric patients."( Intranasal fentanyl and high-concentration inhaled nitrous oxide for procedural sedation: a prospective observational pilot study of adverse events and depth of sedation.
Babl, FE; Seith, RW; Theophilos, T, 2012
)
0.77
" N(2)O concentration, dose, timing of INF, adverse events, and sedation depth were recorded."( Intranasal fentanyl and high-concentration inhaled nitrous oxide for procedural sedation: a prospective observational pilot study of adverse events and depth of sedation.
Babl, FE; Seith, RW; Theophilos, T, 2012
)
0.77
" No patients had serious adverse events; vomiting was recorded in 19."( Intranasal fentanyl and high-concentration inhaled nitrous oxide for procedural sedation: a prospective observational pilot study of adverse events and depth of sedation.
Babl, FE; Seith, RW; Theophilos, T, 2012
)
0.77
"There were no serious adverse events identified in this pilot study of combined N(2)O and INF."( Intranasal fentanyl and high-concentration inhaled nitrous oxide for procedural sedation: a prospective observational pilot study of adverse events and depth of sedation.
Babl, FE; Seith, RW; Theophilos, T, 2012
)
0.77
"In this study, IVKT was a safe analgesic in the setting of primary ESS."( The safety and efficacy of intravenous ketorolac in patients undergoing primary endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.
Fargo, K; Moeller, C; Pappas, AL; Pawlowski, J; Welch, K,
)
0.13
"The findings indicate comparability of transdermal buprenorphine and transdermal fentanyl for pain measures with significantly fewer adverse events (nausea and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events) caused by transdermal buprenorphine."( Systematic review of efficacy and safety of buprenorphine versus fentanyl or morphine in patients with chronic moderate to severe pain.
Aune, D; Hernandez, AV; Kleijnen, J; Misso, K; Riemsma, R; Truyers, C; Wolff, RF, 2012
)
0.84
" Adverse events were monitored throughout the study."( Efficacy and safety of fentanyl sublingual spray for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Bull, J; Dillaha, L; Geach, J; Parikh, N; Rauck, R; Reynolds, L; Scherlis, M; Stearns, L, 2012
)
0.69
" During double-blind treatment, the most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (7."( Efficacy and safety of fentanyl sublingual spray for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Bull, J; Dillaha, L; Geach, J; Parikh, N; Rauck, R; Reynolds, L; Scherlis, M; Stearns, L, 2012
)
0.69
"It has been confirmed by several clinical trials that the fentanyl patch causes less adverse events than sustained-release oral morphine, and after rotation."( [A pilot study of the reduced effects of adverse events caused by oral morphine and oxycodone after rotating to fentanyl patch in patients with metastatic breast cancer].
Fujii, S; Ikeda, M; Koike, Y; Kubo, S; Kurebayashi, J; Mizutou, A; Nakashima, K; Nomura, T; Oota, Y; Saitou, W; Seki, M; Shiiki, S; Shimo, T; Sonoo, H; Tanaka, K; Yamamoto, Y; Yamashita, T, 2012
)
0.83
"We prospectively investigated the reduced effects of adverse events caused by sustained-release oral morphine and controlled-release oxycodone after rotating to the fentanyl patch in patients with metastatic breast cancer."( [A pilot study of the reduced effects of adverse events caused by oral morphine and oxycodone after rotating to fentanyl patch in patients with metastatic breast cancer].
Fujii, S; Ikeda, M; Koike, Y; Kubo, S; Kurebayashi, J; Mizutou, A; Nakashima, K; Nomura, T; Oota, Y; Saitou, W; Seki, M; Shiiki, S; Shimo, T; Sonoo, H; Tanaka, K; Yamamoto, Y; Yamashita, T, 2012
)
0.79
" Those experiencing adverse events from oral morphine or oral oxycodone were administered a fentanyl patch."( [A pilot study of the reduced effects of adverse events caused by oral morphine and oxycodone after rotating to fentanyl patch in patients with metastatic breast cancer].
Fujii, S; Ikeda, M; Koike, Y; Kubo, S; Kurebayashi, J; Mizutou, A; Nakashima, K; Nomura, T; Oota, Y; Saitou, W; Seki, M; Shiiki, S; Shimo, T; Sonoo, H; Tanaka, K; Yamamoto, Y; Yamashita, T, 2012
)
0.81
"This study suggested that the fentanyl patch can reduce adverse events caused by sustained-release oral morphine as well as controlled-release oral oxycodone."( [A pilot study of the reduced effects of adverse events caused by oral morphine and oxycodone after rotating to fentanyl patch in patients with metastatic breast cancer].
Fujii, S; Ikeda, M; Koike, Y; Kubo, S; Kurebayashi, J; Mizutou, A; Nakashima, K; Nomura, T; Oota, Y; Saitou, W; Seki, M; Shiiki, S; Shimo, T; Sonoo, H; Tanaka, K; Yamamoto, Y; Yamashita, T, 2012
)
0.88
" Adverse reactions in the 1× group were transient and included a low prevalence (≤ 33%) of mild sedation, reduced food intake, modest weight loss, and minimal reductions in heart rate and rectal temperature."( The margin of safety of a single application of transdermal fentanyl solution when administered at multiples of the therapeutic dose to laboratory dogs.
Abbott, JA; Clark, TP; Freise, KJ; Newbound, GC; Pohland, RC; Savides, MC; Wilkie, DA, 2012
)
0.62
"The objectives of this study were to describe the type and frequency of postdischarge adverse events related to sedation for elective diagnostic imaging in children and to determine if any patient or drug characteristics were associated with such adverse events."( Postdischarge adverse events related to sedation for diagnostic imaging in children.
Chen, X; Kaila, R; Kannikeswaran, N, 2012
)
0.38
" We administered a postdischarge adverse event questionnaire to families within 3 to 5 days after sedation to assess adverse events such as behavioral changes, vomiting, recovery time to baseline status, and need for medical follow-up."( Postdischarge adverse events related to sedation for diagnostic imaging in children.
Chen, X; Kaila, R; Kannikeswaran, N, 2012
)
0.38
"4% patients experienced postdischarge adverse events."( Postdischarge adverse events related to sedation for diagnostic imaging in children.
Chen, X; Kaila, R; Kannikeswaran, N, 2012
)
0.38
"Postdischarge adverse events related to sedation for diagnostic imaging are minor, mostly behavioral, but occur in a significant number of patients."( Postdischarge adverse events related to sedation for diagnostic imaging in children.
Chen, X; Kaila, R; Kannikeswaran, N, 2012
)
0.38
"The results of this study suggest that (a) etomidate is much safer than propofol for first-trimester surgical abortions and (b) using a lower dose of etomidate, supplemented with fentanyl and midazolam, is more beneficial than the use of etomidate with or without fentanyl in reducing adverse effects like myoclonus and postoperative nausea and vomiting."( A comparison of anesthetic regimens using etomidate and propofol in patients undergoing first-trimester abortions: double-blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and efficacy.
Chu, S; Deng, F; Wu, J; Wu, Z; Xia, G; Yao, S, 2013
)
0.58
" Although intravenously administered morphine can readily provide rapid and effective prehospital analgesia, oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a safe alternative that does not require intravenous access."( Safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for prehospital pain control on the battlefield.
Fowler, M; Kotwal, RS; McGhee, L; McManus, JG; Pennardt, A; Talbot, TS; Wedmore, IS, 2012
)
0.85
" OTFC adverse effects and injuries treated were also evaluated."( Safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for prehospital pain control on the battlefield.
Fowler, M; Kotwal, RS; McGhee, L; McManus, JG; Pennardt, A; Talbot, TS; Wedmore, IS, 2012
)
0.64
" Nausea was the most common adverse effect as reported by 12."( Safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for prehospital pain control on the battlefield.
Fowler, M; Kotwal, RS; McGhee, L; McManus, JG; Pennardt, A; Talbot, TS; Wedmore, IS, 2012
)
0.64
"OTFC is a rapid and noninvasive pain management strategy that provides safe and effective analgesia in the prehospital battlefield setting."( Safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for prehospital pain control on the battlefield.
Fowler, M; Kotwal, RS; McGhee, L; McManus, JG; Pennardt, A; Talbot, TS; Wedmore, IS, 2012
)
0.64
"Discriminatory liver fentanyl concentrations suggestive of therapeutic or toxic drug levels may better assist cause of death determination in cases of suspected fentanyl toxicity than postmortem PB concentrations."( Superiority of postmortem liver fentanyl concentrations over peripheral blood influenced by postmortem interval for determination of fentanyl toxicity.
Apple, FS; Kloss, J; Middleton, O; Mills, K; Olson, KN; Palamalai, V; Strobl, AQ; Thomas, LC, 2013
)
0.99
"Pleuroscopy is considered a safe procedure with a high diagnostic accuracy but this record is based on studies published by pulmonologists experienced in performing the procedure."( Safety and accuracy of semirigid pleuroscopy performed by pulmonary fellows at a major university hospital: our initial experience.
Bajwa, AA; Cury, JD; Jones, L; Shujaat, A; Usman, F, 2013
)
0.39
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sublingual fentanyl oral disintegrating tablets (sublingual fentanyl ODT) for the treatment of breakthrough pain (BTP), cancer or non-cancer related, in terms of relief of pain intensity, adverse events (AEs) and patient satisfaction, and to further examine the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients with BTP in a clinical setting."( Efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablets in patients with breakthrough pain: multicentre prospective study.
Aberasturi, T; Arilla, M; Coma, J; De Sanctis, V; Ferreras, J; Folch, J; Fuentes, J; Guitart, J; Lombán, E; Moya, J; Ribera, H; Rodelas, F; Salazar, R; Sintes, D; Tomás, A; Vargas, I; Vázquez, JM, 2013
)
0.9
" Adverse events were somnolence and other events associated with opioids were mostly mild or moderate."( A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of fentanyl buccal tablets for breakthrough pain: efficacy and safety in Japanese cancer patients.
Adachi, I; Eguchi, K; Goto, F; Hamada, S; Kosugi, T; Kunikane, H; Matoba, M; Shima, Y; Shinozaki, K; Takigawa, C; Tanda, S; Yomiya, K; Yoshimoto, T, 2014
)
0.65
"A combined sedation with propofol plus fentanyl is safe for EVL as well as for SEGD in cirrhotic patients."( The safety of combined sedation with propofol plus fentanyl for endoscopy screening and endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients.
Mao, W; Tao, J; Wei, XQ; Wen, ZF; Wu, B; Zhen, FP, 2014
)
0.92
"IV-PCA provided timely, safe and useful analgesia for patients with severe breakthrough pain and may be useful to help titration of opioids, weaning to oral analgesia and to decide for interventional procedures."( Safety profile of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for breakthrough pain in cancer patients: a case series study.
Ashmawi, HA; Cascudo, GM; de Santana Neto, J; Guimaraes, GM; Neto, JO; Sousa, AM, 2014
)
0.4
" Patients received 1 to 3 doses of either 50 or 100 μg, and the ambulance crew recorded adverse effects and numeric rating scale (0 to 10) pain scores before and after treatment."( Safety of intranasal fentanyl in the out-of-hospital setting: a prospective observational study.
Dahl, JB; Hansen, MS; Karlsen, AP; Pedersen, DM; Trautner, S, 2014
)
0.72
" There were no serious adverse effects and no use of naloxone."( Safety of intranasal fentanyl in the out-of-hospital setting: a prospective observational study.
Dahl, JB; Hansen, MS; Karlsen, AP; Pedersen, DM; Trautner, S, 2014
)
0.72
"The out-of-hospital administration of intranasal fentanyl in doses of 50 to 100 μg is safe and appears effective."( Safety of intranasal fentanyl in the out-of-hospital setting: a prospective observational study.
Dahl, JB; Hansen, MS; Karlsen, AP; Pedersen, DM; Trautner, S, 2014
)
0.98
" Pain intensity by Numeric Rating Scale, number of rescue analgesic doses, and presence and severity of opioid-related adverse events were recorded immediately before TF placement, and at six, 12, 18, and 24 hours thereafter."( Efficacy and safety of a six-hour continuous overlap method for converting intravenous to transdermal fentanyl in cancer pain.
Bloise, R; Davis, MP; Samala, RV, 2014
)
0.62
" Only one patient experienced opioid-related adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of a six-hour continuous overlap method for converting intravenous to transdermal fentanyl in cancer pain.
Bloise, R; Davis, MP; Samala, RV, 2014
)
0.62
"A continuous six-hour overlap method is a safe and effective strategy when converting from IVF to TF in patients with cancer pain."( Efficacy and safety of a six-hour continuous overlap method for converting intravenous to transdermal fentanyl in cancer pain.
Bloise, R; Davis, MP; Samala, RV, 2014
)
0.62
" Pain was evaluated over 4 days by blinded observers using a modified Glasgow composite pain scale, and the a priori criteria for treatment failure was a pain score ≥ 8 or adverse event necessitating withdrawal."( The safety and effectiveness of a long-acting transdermal fentanyl solution compared with oxymorphone for the control of postoperative pain in dogs: a randomized, multicentered clinical study.
Clark, TP; Freise, KJ; Lin, TL; Linton, DD; Martinez, SA; Newbound, GC; Wilson, MG, 2014
)
0.65
" Intravenous ibuprofen administered at induction of anesthesia may be a safe and efficacious option for postoperative tonsillectomy pain."( A multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled, single dose trial of the safety and efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen for treatment of pain in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy.
Bendel, LP; Glover, CD; McCarthy, DL; Moss, JR; Watcha, MF; Witham, SL, 2014
)
0.4
" The incidence of adverse effects was noted at 48 h postoperatively."( The analgesic efficacy and safety of nefopam in patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study.
Choi, DK; Choi, IC; Kim, K; Kim, WJ; Lee, YK; Sim, JY, 2014
)
0.4
"The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of sedation-related adverse events and the independent predictors of sedation requirements in RYGB patients."( Conscious sedation for upper endoscopy in the gastric bypass patient: prevalence of cardiopulmonary adverse events and predictors of sedation requirement.
Abu Dayyeh, BK; Jirapinyo, P; Thompson, CC, 2014
)
0.4
" Primary outcomes are sedation-related adverse events and predictors of sedation requirement."( Conscious sedation for upper endoscopy in the gastric bypass patient: prevalence of cardiopulmonary adverse events and predictors of sedation requirement.
Abu Dayyeh, BK; Jirapinyo, P; Thompson, CC, 2014
)
0.4
" The non-cardiopulmonary adverse events were procedure-specific and unrelated to sedation."( Conscious sedation for upper endoscopy in the gastric bypass patient: prevalence of cardiopulmonary adverse events and predictors of sedation requirement.
Abu Dayyeh, BK; Jirapinyo, P; Thompson, CC, 2014
)
0.4
"Analgosedation with fentanyl appears to be a safe and effective strategy to facilitate mechanical ventilation."( Efficacy and safety of analgosedation with fentanyl compared with traditional sedation with propofol.
Edwin, SB; McNorton, KN; Tedders, KM, 2014
)
0.99
" Visual analogue scale (VAS), requirement of fentanyl and flurbiprofen, and the incidence of remifentanil-related adverse effects (respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were examined at 3 hourly intervals for 12 hours."( [Efficacy and safety of remifentanil-based regimen for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery patients: a double-blind study with low-dose remifentanil infusion of 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)].
Hirano, H; Kaida, T; Machino, A; Nagasaka, Y; Shirasaki, R; Wakamatsu, M, 2014
)
0.66
" No adverse events including respiratory depression occurred throughout the study in both groups."( [Efficacy and safety of remifentanil-based regimen for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery patients: a double-blind study with low-dose remifentanil infusion of 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)].
Hirano, H; Kaida, T; Machino, A; Nagasaka, Y; Shirasaki, R; Wakamatsu, M, 2014
)
0.4
"02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) can safely be used without any serious adverse events, while it may not be enough for postoperative analgesia."( [Efficacy and safety of remifentanil-based regimen for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery patients: a double-blind study with low-dose remifentanil infusion of 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)].
Hirano, H; Kaida, T; Machino, A; Nagasaka, Y; Shirasaki, R; Wakamatsu, M, 2014
)
0.4
"Eleven of 42 subjects who received the sublingual fentanyl tablet experienced adverse drug reactions."( Efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet at doses determined by titration for the treatment of breakthrough pain in Japanese cancer patients: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial.
Gomyo, I; Katakami, N; Ohta, E; Okada, M; Shimoyama, M; Shimoyama, N; Yukitoshi, N, 2015
)
0.95
"Sublingual fentanyl tablets at doses determined by titration were effective and safe for breakthrough pain treatment in cancer patients treated with strong opioid analgesics at fixed intervals."( Efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet at doses determined by titration for the treatment of breakthrough pain in Japanese cancer patients: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial.
Gomyo, I; Katakami, N; Ohta, E; Okada, M; Shimoyama, M; Shimoyama, N; Yukitoshi, N, 2015
)
1.09
" The most common adverse reactions were nausea and vomiting (10."( Transdermal fentanyl for pain due to chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in nasopharyngeal cancer patients: evaluating efficacy, safety, and improvement in quality of life.
Feng, HX; Guo, SP; He, ZY; Li, FY; Sun, JY; Wu, SG; Wu, YJ; Zhou, J, 2014
)
0.78
" Overall adverse events in the 2 treatment groups were also compared."( Efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl in the control of postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy.
Bae, JH; Choi, CY; Kim, JM; Kim, YJ; Lee, YW, 2014
)
0.68
" Total number of patients who reported adverse events was significantly higher in the fentanyl group (P=0."( Efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl in the control of postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy.
Bae, JH; Choi, CY; Kim, JM; Kim, YJ; Lee, YW, 2014
)
0.9
"TDF was more effective in the control of postoperative pain after PRK than tramadol/acetaminophen and no irreversible or severe adverse effect was reported with 12 μg/h concentration."( Efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl in the control of postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy.
Bae, JH; Choi, CY; Kim, JM; Kim, YJ; Lee, YW, 2014
)
0.68
", N-(1-(2-phenoxyethyl)-4-piperidinyl)propionanilide (2), N-isopropyl-3-(4-(N-phenylpropionamido)piperidin-1-yl)propanamide (5), and N-t-butyl-3-(4-(N-phenylpropionamido)piperidin-1-yl)propanamide (6) were found to be more effective and less toxic compared to fentanyl."( Acute inhalation toxicity of smoke of fentanyl and its 1-substituted analogs in Swiss albino mice.
Bhattacharya, R; Ganesan, K; Gupta, PK; Jain, AK; Kumar, P; Maurya, CK; Meena, MK; Swami, D; Yadav, SK, 2014
)
0.85
" Central nervous system adverse effects are rare."( Neuropsychiatric side effects due to a transdermal fentanyl patch: hallucinations.
Afacan, MA; Aktas, S; Colak, S; Erdogan, MO; Kandis, H; Kosargelir, M; Tayfur, İ, 2015
)
0.67
" Adverse reactions were observed in 17."( Efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet at doses determined from oral morphine rescue doses in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain.
Gomyo, I; Higuchi, H; Kojima, K; Ohta, E; Shimoyama, M; Shimoyama, N; Teramoto, O; Yukitoshi, N, 2015
)
0.7
" Safety was assessed mainly by adverse events."( Breakthrough pain management using fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) in combination with around-the-clock (ATC) opioids based on the efficacy and safety of FBT, and its relationship with ATC opioids: results from an open-label, multi-center study in Japanese c
Adachi, I; Eguchi, K; Goto, F; Matoba, M; Shima, Y; Takigawa, C; Tanda, S; Yomiya, K; Yoshimoto, T, 2015
)
0.69
" Treatment-related adverse events were all common with opioid treatment and did not increase over time."( Breakthrough pain management using fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) in combination with around-the-clock (ATC) opioids based on the efficacy and safety of FBT, and its relationship with ATC opioids: results from an open-label, multi-center study in Japanese c
Adachi, I; Eguchi, K; Goto, F; Matoba, M; Shima, Y; Takigawa, C; Tanda, S; Yomiya, K; Yoshimoto, T, 2015
)
0.69
" In this study, we retrospectively investigated 12 gastrointestinal cancer patients to evaluate the efficacy and frequency of adverse effects of TDF patches compared to oral oxycodone (OXY) for opioid initiation."( [Efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl patches for opioid initiation in patients with gastrointestinal obstruction].
Goto, T; Hasuo, Y; Kai, S; Misumi, N; Miyoshi, T; Nishino, T; Yamauchi, H; Yoshida, E, 2014
)
0.68
"Tracheal intubation in PICUs is often associated with adverse tracheal intubation-associated events."( Current medication practice and tracheal intubation safety outcomes from a prospective multicenter observational cohort study.
Brown, CA; Howell, JD; Hsing, DD; Montgomery, V; Nadkarni, VM; Nishisaki, A; Parker, MM; Tarquinio, KM; Turner, DA; Walls, RM, 2015
)
0.42
" Adverse tracheal intubation-associated events were defined a priori."( Current medication practice and tracheal intubation safety outcomes from a prospective multicenter observational cohort study.
Brown, CA; Howell, JD; Hsing, DD; Montgomery, V; Nadkarni, VM; Nishisaki, A; Parker, MM; Tarquinio, KM; Turner, DA; Walls, RM, 2015
)
0.42
" Adverse events (AE) were recorded throughout."( Efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl tablets for the management of breakthrough pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain with neuropathic component: multicenter prospective study.
Camba-Rodríguez, A; Cánovas-Martínez, L; Carceller-Ruiz, JJ; De la Iglesia-López, A; Díaz-Parada, P; Domínguez-Suárez, E; Freire-Vila, E; Iglesias, BG; Illodo-Miramontes, G; López-Ulloa, B, 2015
)
0.7
" The primary outcome was the Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE) to assess safety and adverse effects."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of oral cannabidiol when administered concomitantly with intravenous fentanyl in humans.
Barnes, AJ; Bergamaschi, MM; Hernandez, S; Huestis, MA; Hurd, YL; Jutras-Aswad, D; Manini, AF; Olmedo, R; Sinha, R; Winkel, G; Yiannoulos, G,
)
0.35
"Cannabidiol does not exacerbate adverse effects associated with intravenous fentanyl administration."( Safety and pharmacokinetics of oral cannabidiol when administered concomitantly with intravenous fentanyl in humans.
Barnes, AJ; Bergamaschi, MM; Hernandez, S; Huestis, MA; Hurd, YL; Jutras-Aswad, D; Manini, AF; Olmedo, R; Sinha, R; Winkel, G; Yiannoulos, G,
)
0.58
" Oxycodone and fentanyl, in relation to the symptoms studied, seem to be safe as used and titrated in routine cancer pain care."( Renal function and symptoms/adverse effects in opioid-treated patients with cancer.
Christrup, L; Dale, O; Davies, A; Ekholm, O; Kaasa, S; Klepstad, P; Kurita, GP; Lundström, S; Sjøgren, P, 2015
)
0.77
" Moreover, no significant adverse effects were reported during and after the surgery."( Safety and Efficacy of Propranolol in Comparison With Combination of Fentanyl and Ketamine as Premedication in Cataract Surgery Under the Topical Anesthesia.
Fazel, F; Mahboubi, M; Rezaei, L; Saryazdi, H, 2015
)
0.65
" Propofol-based sedation is simple, easy to use, and effective, but is not without cardiovascular and respiratory adverse effects."( A randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety profile of a dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination with a propofol-fentanyl combination for ERCP.
Goyal, R; Hasnain, S; Mittal, S; Shreevastava, S, 2016
)
0.64
" The sedation-related adverse effects and recovery time were noted."( A randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety profile of a dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination with a propofol-fentanyl combination for ERCP.
Goyal, R; Hasnain, S; Mittal, S; Shreevastava, S, 2016
)
0.64
"There were significantly fewer sedation-related adverse effects, but the recovery time was longer with DK."( A randomized, controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety profile of a dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination with a propofol-fentanyl combination for ERCP.
Goyal, R; Hasnain, S; Mittal, S; Shreevastava, S, 2016
)
0.64
"This analysis compared opioid-related adverse events (ORADEs) observed with fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS) versus morphine intravenous (iv."( A comparison of opioid-related adverse events with fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in acute postoperative pain.
Danesi, H; Ding, L; Grond, S; Jones, JB; Sinatra, RS; Viscusi, ER, 2016
)
0.92
" Treatment-emergent adverse events were collected via spontaneous report."( A comparison of opioid-related adverse events with fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system versus morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in acute postoperative pain.
Danesi, H; Ding, L; Grond, S; Jones, JB; Sinatra, RS; Viscusi, ER, 2016
)
0.69
"The significant improvement in the number of patients experiencing little or no pain, accompanied by a lower number of non-severe side effects, suggests that FBT is a valid, practical and safe method of procedural analgesia."( A phase II study on the efficacy and safety of procedural analgesia with fentanyl buccal tablet in cancer patients for the placement of indwelling central venous access systems.
Bedin, S; Bertuzzi, C; Bortolussi, R; Caserta, M; Colussi, AM; Fabiani, F; Fantin, D; Fracasso, A; Gussetti, D; Matovic, M; Morabito, A; Polesel, J; Roscetti, A; Santantonio, C; Zanier, C; Zotti, P, 2016
)
0.67
" Furthermore, it is a reasonably safe treatment, causing generally mild adverse events not leading to treatment discontinuation."( Efficacy and Safety of Oral or Nasal Fentanyl for Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.
Escobar, Y; Moya, J; Murillo, M; Rogríguez, D; Urrutia, G, 2015
)
0.69
"In this retrospective analysis of 10,575 patients who used fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) after surgery, we evaluated difference between young and elderly patients on their characteristic of adverse effects."( Postoperative Pain and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia-Related Adverse Effects in Young and Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of 10,575 Patients.
Choi, S; Han, DW; Kim, SY; Koh, JC; Lee, J, 2015
)
0.66
"Intravenous fentanyl caused clinically meaningful pain reduction in most patients and was safe in the hands of ambulance personnel."( Efficacy and safety of intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel.
Christensen, EF; Friesgaard, KD; Giebner, M; Kirkegaard, H; Nikolajsen, L; Rasmussen, CH; Riddervold, IS, 2016
)
1.09
"Fentanyl-induced neurotoxicity is an uncommon adverse effect of fentanyl and is seldom seen in pediatric palliative care practice."( Fentanyl-Induced Neurotoxicity in Children.
Deodhar, J; Muckaden, MA; Ostwal, S; Salins, N, 2015
)
3.3
"This trial aimed to ascertain the relative efficacy, adverse effects, and acceptability of fentanyl versus pethidine for pain relief during labour."( The safety and acceptability of intravenous fentanyl versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief during labour.
Dawood, R; El-Shamy, ES; Habeeb, R; Massod, A; Rezk, M, 2015
)
0.9
" Pain scores hourly, maternal and fetal adverse effects, neonatal outcome, and maternal acceptability were assessed."( The safety and acceptability of intravenous fentanyl versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief during labour.
Dawood, R; El-Shamy, ES; Habeeb, R; Massod, A; Rezk, M, 2015
)
0.68
" The incidence of adverse events (AEs), results of laboratory tests, vital sign assessments, and treatment satisfaction were assessed."( Long-term safety of fentanyl sublingual spray in opioid-tolerant patients with breakthrough cancer pain.
Brownlow, RC; Bull, J; Minkowitz, H; Parikh, N; Rauck, R, 2016
)
0.76
"This long-term maintenance study demonstrated that fentanyl sublingual spray was generally safe and well tolerated for managing BTCP over a 90-day period."( Long-term safety of fentanyl sublingual spray in opioid-tolerant patients with breakthrough cancer pain.
Brownlow, RC; Bull, J; Minkowitz, H; Parikh, N; Rauck, R, 2016
)
1.01
" No serious adverse events were seen, and minor sedation-related adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both groups (8."( Capnographic Monitoring of Moderate Sedation During Low-Risk Screening Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Safety or Patient Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Barnett, S; Bukoye, B; Hung, A; Leffler, DA; Sheehan, J; Sheth, SG; Tsao, R, 2016
)
0.43
" These data suggest that routine capnography in this setting may not be cost effective and that EtCO2 might be reserved for patients at higher risk of adverse events."( Capnographic Monitoring of Moderate Sedation During Low-Risk Screening Colonoscopy Does Not Improve Safety or Patient Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Barnett, S; Bukoye, B; Hung, A; Leffler, DA; Sheehan, J; Sheth, SG; Tsao, R, 2016
)
0.43
" At each visit, pain intensity, modifications of therapy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded."( Are strong opioids equally effective and safe in the treatment of chronic cancer pain? A multicenter randomized phase IV 'real life' trial on the variability of response to opioids.
Apolone, G; Azzarello, G; Bandieri, E; Caraceni, A; Cavanna, L; Corli, O; Crispino, C; Di Gregorio, R; Dragani, TA; Floriani, I; Galli, F; Gamucci, T; Greco, MT; Iorno, V; Kaasa, S; Lipari, G; Luzzani, M; Montanari, M; Pacchioni, M; Pavesi, L; Reale, C; Roberto, A; Valenti, D, 2016
)
0.43
"The main findings were the similarity in pain control, response rates and main adverse reactions among opioids."( Are strong opioids equally effective and safe in the treatment of chronic cancer pain? A multicenter randomized phase IV 'real life' trial on the variability of response to opioids.
Apolone, G; Azzarello, G; Bandieri, E; Caraceni, A; Cavanna, L; Corli, O; Crispino, C; Di Gregorio, R; Dragani, TA; Floriani, I; Galli, F; Gamucci, T; Greco, MT; Iorno, V; Kaasa, S; Lipari, G; Luzzani, M; Montanari, M; Pacchioni, M; Pavesi, L; Reale, C; Roberto, A; Valenti, D, 2016
)
0.43
" Review of prior opioid exposure may be a simple but important way to improve the safe use of fentanyl patches."( Safety of fentanyl initiation according to past opioid exposure among patients newly prescribed fentanyl patches.
Bugden, S; Friesen, KJ; Woelk, C, 2016
)
1.06
" There were no other statistically significant between-group differences in the incidence of adverse events."( Opioid sparing effect and safety of nefopam in patient controlled analgesia after laparotomy: A randomized, double blind study.
Cho, CW; Jin, HS; Kim, WJ; Kim, YC; Lee, C; Yoo, Y, 2016
)
0.43
"Intravenous PCA using nefopam + fentanyl following laparotomy has an opioid sparing effect and is associated with a low incidence of some of the typical opioid related adverse events."( Opioid sparing effect and safety of nefopam in patient controlled analgesia after laparotomy: A randomized, double blind study.
Cho, CW; Jin, HS; Kim, WJ; Kim, YC; Lee, C; Yoo, Y, 2016
)
0.72
" Adverse events are as follows."( Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Indicators of Safety Compromise following Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice.
Borgaonkar, MR; Evans, B; Hickey, N; Lougheed, M; Marcoux, C; McGrath, J; O'Leary, M; Pace, D, 2016
)
0.43
" Safety was evaluated via adverse events."( The Efficacy and Safety of the Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (IONSYS
Ding, L; Itri, LM; Viscusi, ER, 2016
)
0.72
" Secondary outcomes included block quality, maternal adverse effects, uterine contraction patterns, and fetal outcomes analyzed by using the χ test with Yates continuity correction."( Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Bibbo, C; Cappiello, EC; Chau, A; Elterman, KG; Huang, CC; Robinson, JN; Tsen, LC, 2017
)
0.46
" Nausea, vomiting, somnolence, and dizziness were the most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and all AEs were grade 1 (mild) or 2 (moderate)."( Initial titration with 200 μg fentanyl buccal tablets: a retrospective safety analysis in Korean cancer patients.
Cho, HN; Koo, DH; Kwon, MY; Lee, SS; Lee, YG; Oh, S, 2018
)
0.77
" The authors compared the antinociceptive and respiratory depressant effects of cebranopadol and the classic opioid fentanyl and used selective antagonists to provide the first mechanistic evidence of the contributions of the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and μ-opioid peptide receptors to cebranopadol's respiratory side-effect profile."( Opioid-type Respiratory Depressant Side Effects of Cebranopadol in Rats Are Limited by Its Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Peptide Receptor Agonist Activity.
Christoph, T; Frosch, S; Linz, K; Schröder, W, 2017
)
0.66
" We compared sedation and recovery times, medication doses, and adverse events between groups."( Bolus Administration of Fentanyl and Midazolam for Colonoscopy Increases Endoscopy Unit Efficiency and Safety Compared With Titrated Sedation.
Boyd, A; Finn, RT; Gellad, ZF; Lin, L, 2017
)
0.76
" Pain scores, adverse events, and length of stay were recorded."( Intrathecal Morphine and Oral Analgesics Provide Safe and Effective Pain Control After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Abbott, MD; Burke, MC; Caird, MS; Farley, FA; Gibbons, KM; Holman, AE; Hong, RA; Li, Y; Robbins, CB, 2018
)
0.48
" Adverse events occurred at similar rates in both groups."( Intrathecal Morphine and Oral Analgesics Provide Safe and Effective Pain Control After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Abbott, MD; Burke, MC; Caird, MS; Farley, FA; Gibbons, KM; Holman, AE; Hong, RA; Li, Y; Robbins, CB, 2018
)
0.48
"ITM and oral analgesics provide safe and effective pain control after PSF for AIS."( Intrathecal Morphine and Oral Analgesics Provide Safe and Effective Pain Control After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Abbott, MD; Burke, MC; Caird, MS; Farley, FA; Gibbons, KM; Holman, AE; Hong, RA; Li, Y; Robbins, CB, 2018
)
0.48
" The results suggest that doses of 200 mcg or lower may be safe for use in an opioid-naïve population."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of fentanyl sublingual spray and fentanyl citrate intravenous: a multiple ascending dose study in opioid-naïve healthy volunteers.
Koch, C; Nalamachu, S; Oh, DA; Parikh, N; Rauck, RL; Singla, N; Vetticaden, S; Wilson, D; Yu, J, 2017
)
0.74
" This article illustrates these challenges using a post-authorization safety study (PASS) to assess adverse events (AEs) experienced with fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) over 3 months of treatment."( Challenges of post-authorization safety studies: Lessons learned and results of a French study of fentanyl buccal tablet.
Bartov, N; Bidollari, I; Gavrielov-Yusim, N; Kaplan, S, 2018
)
0.9
"Our objective was to assess the effect of sublingual fentanyl tablets (SFTs) on pain relief, quality of life, and adverse effects in patients with cancer pain, according to cancer stage and background opioid regimen."( Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Fentanyl Tablets in Breakthrough Cancer Pain Management According to Cancer Stage and Background Opioid Medication.
Coma, J; De Sanctis, V; Estivill, P; Ferreras, J; Folch, J; Fuentes, J; Guitart, J; Jiménez, AJ; Moya, J; Rodelas, F; Salazar, R; Sanz, A; Tomás, A; Vargas, MI, 2018
)
1.01
" The efficacy and safety of SFTs were evaluated, recording pain intensity (PI), onset of pain relief, and adverse events (AEs)."( Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Fentanyl Tablets in Breakthrough Cancer Pain Management According to Cancer Stage and Background Opioid Medication.
Coma, J; De Sanctis, V; Estivill, P; Ferreras, J; Folch, J; Fuentes, J; Guitart, J; Jiménez, AJ; Moya, J; Rodelas, F; Salazar, R; Sanz, A; Tomás, A; Vargas, MI, 2018
)
0.76
" However, the causes of fentanyl-induced fatal adverse effects have not been thoroughly researched."( P-Glycoprotein on Blood-Brain Barrier Plays a Vital Role in Fentanyl Brain Exposure and Respiratory Toxicity in Rats.
Li, H; Yang, H; Yu, C; Yuan, M; Zhuang, X, 2018
)
1.03
" There were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events."( A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Barish, CF; Bernstein, D; Bhandari, R; Cash, BD; DeMicco, MP; Desta, T; Etzkorn, K; Pruitt, R; Quirk, D; Rex, DK; Schaeffer, C; Sullivan, S; Tiongco, F, 2018
)
0.48
" Our findings suggest that local anaesthesia with conscious sedation is a safe and feasible option for cardiac device implantation procedures, including complex procedures."( Feasibility and safety of using local anaesthesia with conscious sedation during complex cardiac implantable electronic device procedures.
Jánosi, RA; Kaya, E; Lortz, J; Rassaf, T; Südkamp, H, 2018
)
0.48
"The administration of ketamine during burn wound care using a critical care RN-driven protocol was associated with reduced opioid and benzodiazepine requirements and few adverse effects."( CE: Original Research: The Efficacy and Safety of an RN-Driven Ketamine Protocol for Adjunctive Analgesia During Burn Wound Care.
Baumgartner, L; MacLaren, R; Townsend, N; Winkelman, K, 2018
)
0.48
" Data were self-reported by patients (pain, adverse events [AEs] and healthcare resources use) and physicians (morphine equivalent daily dose [MEDD] prescribed and suspected adverse drug reaction [ADRs])."( Health benefits of an adverse events reporting system for chronic pain patients using long-term opioids.
Ajo, R; Esteban, MD; Inda, MD; Margarit, C; Muriel, J; Peiró, AM; Planelles, B; Sastre, Y, 2019
)
0.51
" The primary outcome measures were adverse events and failed laceration repair."( Safety and effectiveness of intranasal midazolam and fentanyl used in combination in the pediatric emergency department.
Cosgrove, P; Kienstra, AJ; Ryan, PM; Vezzetti, R; Wilkinson, M, 2019
)
0.76
" There were no serious adverse events reported."( Safety and effectiveness of intranasal midazolam and fentanyl used in combination in the pediatric emergency department.
Cosgrove, P; Kienstra, AJ; Ryan, PM; Vezzetti, R; Wilkinson, M, 2019
)
0.76
"Our results suggest that the combination of INM and INF may be a safe and effective strategy for procedural sedation in young children undergoing simple laceration repair."( Safety and effectiveness of intranasal midazolam and fentanyl used in combination in the pediatric emergency department.
Cosgrove, P; Kienstra, AJ; Ryan, PM; Vezzetti, R; Wilkinson, M, 2019
)
0.76
" Our program appears to be safe and may serve as a model for other settings dealing with a large numbers of opioid OD."( Safety of a Modified Community Trailer to Manage Patients with Presumed Fentanyl Overdose.
Ahamad, K; Buxton, J; DeVlaming, S; Grafstein, E; Gustafson, R; Kestler, A; Lysyshyn, M; Prinsloo, G; Scheuermeyer, FX; Van Veen, C, 2019
)
0.75
" The safe preparation of medications during resuscitation requires attention, time and resources, and can be a source of medication error."( Predrawn prehospital medications are microbiologically safe for up to 48 hours.
Foster, A; Garner, A; Gutierrez, CH; Kitcher, J; Soeyland, T; Vidler, S, 2018
)
0.48
"Predrawing of the eight studied medications for urgent prehospital procedures appears to be a microbiologically safe practice with syringe dwell times up to 48 hours."( Predrawn prehospital medications are microbiologically safe for up to 48 hours.
Foster, A; Garner, A; Gutierrez, CH; Kitcher, J; Soeyland, T; Vidler, S, 2018
)
0.48
" We sought to determine the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) when oral azithromycin or intravenous/intramuscular fentanyl are used off-label compared to on-label in pediatric intensive care units (ICUs)."( Serious Adverse Events Associated with Off-Label Use of Azithromycin or Fentanyl in Children in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Chart Review.
Avant, D; Doe, E; Fenn, NE; Lardieri, A; Lieu, P; McMahon, AW; Oshikoya, KA; Sood, BG; Taketomo, C; Van Driest, SL; Wharton, GT; Yen, L, 2019
)
0.96
" Surprisingly, respiratory depression, constipation, and opioid withdrawal signs are unchanged or exacerbated, indicating that β-arrestin recruitment does not contribute to the severity of opioid side effects and, hence, predicting that G-protein-biased µ-agonists are still likely to elicit severe adverse effects."( Phosphorylation-deficient G-protein-biased μ-opioid receptors improve analgesia and diminish tolerance but worsen opioid side effects.
Bailey, A; Bateman, JT; Christie, MJ; Kliewer, A; Levitt, ES; Schmiedel, F; Schulz, S; Sianati, S; Williams, JT, 2019
)
0.51
" However, although opioids have been appropriately used in Japan, they rarely induce serious adverse events, such as respiratory depression."( Current Status of Adverse Events Related with Opioid Analgesics in Japan: Assessment Based on Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database.
Futamura, A; Nakagawa, T; Suga, Y; Sugawara, H; Suzuki, S; Takase, H; Torigoe, K; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y, 2019
)
0.51
" Adverse events in CAPS patients were recorded."( Computer-Assisted Propofol Sedation for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Is Effective, Efficient, and Safe.
Beecher, R; Chiorean, M; Drennan, F; Gluck, M; Koch, J; Kozarek, RA; La Selva, D; Larsen, M; Lin, OS; McCormick, S; Ross, A; Tombs, D; Venu, N; Weigel, W, 2019
)
0.51
" There were no other serious adverse events."( Computer-Assisted Propofol Sedation for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Is Effective, Efficient, and Safe.
Beecher, R; Chiorean, M; Drennan, F; Gluck, M; Koch, J; Kozarek, RA; La Selva, D; Larsen, M; Lin, OS; McCormick, S; Ross, A; Tombs, D; Venu, N; Weigel, W, 2019
)
0.51
"This retrospective cohort study of cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopy from a large academic medical center between 2010 and 2014 examined extensive clinical data including the following: past history, physical findings, laboratory results, and procedural adverse events."( Sedation During Endoscopy in Patients with Cirrhosis: Safety and Predictors of Adverse Events.
Edelson, J; Rockey, DC; Suarez, AL; Zhang, J, 2020
)
0.56
" There was no difference in the frequency of adverse events in MAC and moderate sedation groups, with a total of 15 adverse events (7/1157 MAC and 8/1461 moderate sedation)."( Sedation During Endoscopy in Patients with Cirrhosis: Safety and Predictors of Adverse Events.
Edelson, J; Rockey, DC; Suarez, AL; Zhang, J, 2020
)
0.56
"Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are challenging, resource-intensive, and costly opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs)."( Opioid-related respiratory and gastrointestinal adverse events in patients with acute postoperative pain: prevalence, predictors, and burden.
Habib, AS; Iqbal, SU; Kugel, M; Liu, S; Morland, K; Oderda, GM; Senagore, AJ,
)
0.13
"Solutions that provide a legal and safe supply of non-adulterated stimulants of known quality, and within a health care framework, are needed to directly address the risk of an increasingly adulterated stimulant supply."( Stimulant safe supply: a potential opportunity to respond to the overdose epidemic.
Barker, A; Fleming, T; Ivsins, A; McNeil, R; Vakharia, S, 2020
)
0.56
"Efforts are needed to investigate the feasibility of pharmacological stimulant-based interventions that address safe supply needs."( Stimulant safe supply: a potential opportunity to respond to the overdose epidemic.
Barker, A; Fleming, T; Ivsins, A; McNeil, R; Vakharia, S, 2020
)
0.56
", hydromorphone) to disrupt the toxic drug supply and make safer opioids widely available to people at high risk of fatal overdose."( Tackling the overdose crisis: The role of safe supply.
Beletsky, L; Boyd, J; Ivsins, A; McNeil, R, 2020
)
0.56
"This study suggests MMT is safe despite repeated exposure to fentanyl while taking methadone."( One year of methadone maintenance treatment in a fentanyl endemic area: Safety, repeated exposure, retention, and remission.
Carroll, JJ; Green, TC; Rich, JD; Stone, AC, 2020
)
1.05
" The arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic comes at time when North America is in the midst of a protracted overdose epidemic caused by a toxic illegal drug supply."( Safer opioid distribution in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Tyndall, M, 2020
)
0.56
" Following dose escalation to 4 mg, respiratory depression occurred in one patient; however, this was considered a mild adverse event."( Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Citrate Patch, Including a Low-Dose 0.5 mg Formulation, in Opioid-Naïve Patients with Cancer Pain.
Hashimoto, F; Okawa, K; Tanaka, Y; Terahara, T; Uchida, E; Yamaguchi, S, 2020
)
0.87
" The most common adverse drug events in the titration phase were drowsiness (20%), dizziness (7%), and nausea 4%, and in the double-blind phase only drowsiness (12%)."( Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Akbari, ME; Delshad, MH; Golmakani, E; Hashemi, M; Shadnoush, M; Zali, A, 2021
)
0.88
" Several techniques such as positive airway pressure and head-up tilt during preoxygenation have shown to prolong safe apnea period compared to conventional technique."( Effect of Positive Airway Pressure During Preoxygenation on Safe Apnea Period: a comparison of the supine and 25° head up position.
Bhattarai, B; Dhakal, Y; Khatiwada, S; Subedi, A,
)
0.13
" In response to the opioid crisis in NH, Manchester Fire Department (MFD), the state's largest city fire department, launched the Safe Station program in 2016 in partnership with other community organizations."( Implementation of a New Hampshire community-initiated response to the opioid crisis: A mixed-methods process evaluation of Safe Station.
Bell, K; Marsch, LA; McLeman, B; Meier, A; Metcalf, SA; Moore, SK; Saunders, EC; Walsh, O, 2021
)
0.62
" The development of gender-responsive programs that address targeted concerns may be an avenue to enhance engagement with harm reduction and treatment services and create safe spaces for women not currently accessing available services."( Competing risks of women and men who use fentanyl: "The number one thing I worry about would be my safety and number two would be overdose".
Bagley, SM; Gunn, CM; Harris, MTH; Maschke, A; Sampath, S; Schoenberger, SF; Walley, AY, 2021
)
0.89
"Clinically meaningful pain reduction with respect to severity and the adverse events of drugs used in prehospital pain management for children are areas that have not received sufficient attention."( The effectiveness and safety of paediatric prehospital pain management: a systematic review.
Abebe, Y; Hetmann, F; Holland, M; Staff, T; Sumera, K, 2021
)
0.62
" The main outcomes were (1) measurable pain reduction (effectiveness) and (2) no occurrence of any serious adverse events."( The effectiveness and safety of paediatric prehospital pain management: a systematic review.
Abebe, Y; Hetmann, F; Holland, M; Staff, T; Sumera, K, 2021
)
0.62
" Adverse events of fentanyl, methoxyflurane and ketamine were also reported, although none of these were considered serious."( The effectiveness and safety of paediatric prehospital pain management: a systematic review.
Abebe, Y; Hetmann, F; Holland, M; Staff, T; Sumera, K, 2021
)
0.95
" No serious adverse events were reported following the administration of fentanyl, methoxyflurane and ketamine."( The effectiveness and safety of paediatric prehospital pain management: a systematic review.
Abebe, Y; Hetmann, F; Holland, M; Staff, T; Sumera, K, 2021
)
0.85
" In silico findings indicate the high toxic potential of etazene which may lead to drug-drug interactions and accumulation of substances."( Etazene induces developmental toxicity in vivo Danio rerio and in silico studies of new synthetic opioid derivative.
Boguszewska-Czubara, A; Budzyńska, B; Chłopaś-Konowałek, A; Kurach, Ł; Szpot, P; Zawadzki, M, 2021
)
0.62
" This study aimed to determine whether intrathecal fentanyl or sufentanil offers safety in mortality and perioperative adverse events."( Safety and effectiveness of adding fentanyl or sufentanil to spinal anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Azi, LMTA; de Ávila Oliveira, R; Fonseca, NM; Guimarães, GMN; Pontes, JPJ,
)
0.66
" Safe supply programs are required now more than ever to address the high rate of drug toxicity overdose deaths caused by illicit fentanyl and its analogues."( Investigating opioid preference to inform safe supply services: A cross sectional study.
Buxton, JA; Ferguson, M; Lock, K; Papamihali, K; Parmar, A; Weng, A, 2022
)
0.93
" To create effective safe supply programs, we need to engage PWUD about their drugs of choice."( Investigating opioid preference to inform safe supply services: A cross sectional study.
Buxton, JA; Ferguson, M; Lock, K; Papamihali, K; Parmar, A; Weng, A, 2022
)
0.72
"This study aimed to determine if the use of intranasal (IN) fentanyl in the pediatric emergency department of 2 to 5 μg/kg at doses greater than 100 μg is associated with adverse events in pediatric patients."( The Safety of High-Dose Intranasal Fentanyl in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Anderson, T; Harrell, C; Kink, R; Snider, M, 2022
)
1.24
" All adverse events documented through the hospital's voluntary safety reporting system involving IN fentanyl were reviewed to determine patient outcomes."( The Safety of High-Dose Intranasal Fentanyl in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Anderson, T; Harrell, C; Kink, R; Snider, M, 2022
)
1.21
" A total of 13 adverse events were documented, with only 3 occurring at doses greater than 100 μg."( The Safety of High-Dose Intranasal Fentanyl in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Anderson, T; Harrell, C; Kink, R; Snider, M, 2022
)
1
" Our results indicate that fentanyl can be safely administered at doses of greater than 100 μg without any clinically significant adverse outcomes observed for 7 years of use."( The Safety of High-Dose Intranasal Fentanyl in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
Anderson, T; Harrell, C; Kink, R; Snider, M, 2022
)
1.3
" And it is a trend that RIB may be a kind of effective and safe nerve bock technology and it requires further studies."( Efficacy and safety of rhomboid intercostal block for analgesia in breast surgery and thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.
Chen, R; Shu, H; Su, S, 2022
)
0.72
" Little is known about behavior change after fentanyl testing and the attitudes around fentanyl knowledge and testing along the US-Mexico border in the context of a safe consumption site."( Behavior change after fentanyl testing at a safe consumption space for women in Northern Mexico: A pilot study.
Angulo, L; Arredondo, J; Cambou, MC; Gonzalez-Nieto, P; Goodman-Meza, D; Loera, A; Pitpitan, EV; Shoptaw, S; Slim, S, 2022
)
1.3
"This was a pilot quantitative and qualitative study with 30 women who use drugs at an unsanctioned safe consumption site in Mexicali, Mexico."( Behavior change after fentanyl testing at a safe consumption space for women in Northern Mexico: A pilot study.
Angulo, L; Arredondo, J; Cambou, MC; Gonzalez-Nieto, P; Goodman-Meza, D; Loera, A; Pitpitan, EV; Shoptaw, S; Slim, S, 2022
)
1.04
"There is an urgent need for development of drugs that are able to reverse the adverse effects of opioids on breathing and arterial blood-gas (ABG) chemistry while preserving opioid analgesia."( L-NAC reverses of the adverse effects of fentanyl infusion on ventilation and blood-gas chemistry.
Baby, SM; Bates, JN; Gaston, B; Getsy, PM; Hsieh, YH; Lewis, SJ; Lewis, THJ; May, WJ, 2022
)
0.99
"ESPB was an efficient and safe procedure for postoperative pain management in PCNL."( Efficiency and Safety of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.
Jin, T; Lin, L; Luo, Z; Ma, Y; Xiao, K, 2022
)
0.72
"Ketamine may be a safe and feasible analgesic for medical and cardiac ICU patients who received mechanical ventilation support as an opioid-sparing agent without adverse hemodynamic effects."( Safety and feasibility of continuous ketamine infusion for analgosedation in medical and cardiac ICU patients who received mechanical ventilation support: A retrospective cohort study.
Ahn, HY; Chung, CR; Jung, H; Ko, RE; Lee, J; Suh, GY; Yang, JH, 2022
)
0.72
" By early 2021, MADDS detected shifts in cocaine purity, alerted communities of a new toxic fentanyl analogue and a synthetic cannabinoid contaminant, and confirmed the increase of xylazine (a veterinary sedative) in Massachusetts."( Implementation and Uptake of the Massachusetts Drug Supply Data Stream: A Statewide Public Health-Public Safety Partnership Drug Checking Program.
Consigli, A; Del Pozo, B; Erowid, E; Erowid, F; Green, TC; Jarczyk, C; Michelson, L; Olson, R; Reilly, B; Ruiz, S; Thyssen, S; Wightman, R,
)
0.35
" Adverse events were not observed in patients treated with ketamine."( Efficacy and safety in ketamine-guided prehospital analgesia for abdominal pain.
Dorau, W; Eppler, F; Häske, D; Heinemann, N; Schempf, B; Schopp, T, 2022
)
0.72
" The efficacy and safety of the sedations including sedation time intervals, nausea score, vomiting episodes, pain score, adverse effects, and parent's satisfaction were evaluated."( The efficacy and safety of midazolam with fentanyl versus midazolam with ketamine for bedside invasive procedural sedation in pediatric oncology patients: A randomized, double-blinded, crossover trial.
Lertvivatpong, N; Malaithong, W; Monsereenusorn, C; Photia, A; Rujkijyanont, P; Traivaree, C, 2022
)
0.99
"4%) of severe itching in women, in group I such an adverse reaction was absent."( SAFETY OF USING DURAL PUNCTURE EPIDURAL ANALGESIA AS A METHOD OF LABOR ANALGESIA.
Loskutov, OA; Sulimenko, YM; Zhezher, AO, 2022
)
0.72
" Among these problems, of the highest relevance is also the lack of information about metabolism and adverse effects, which must be faced using simple and low-cost animal models."( Toxicity and behavioural effects of ocfentanil and 2-furanylfentanyl in zebrafish larvae and mice.
Arfè, R; Bilel, S; Gottardo, R; Marti, M; Murari, M; Pesavento, S; Tagliaro, F; Tirri, M; Torroni, L, 2023
)
1.15
"To determine the anesthetic approach with the least adverse events and better cardiorespiratory stability profile, used in infants undergoing laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity."( Safety profile of anesthetic modalities during laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review.
Arvanitaki, Z; Gavriilidou, A; Haidich, AB; Mataftsi, A; Seliniotaki, AK; Ziakas, N, 2023
)
0.91
" Our objective was to assess the safety of rapid inpatient methadone initiation with regard to mortality, overdose, and serious adverse outcomes both in-hospital and postdischarge."( Safety of rapid inpatient methadone initiation protocol: A retrospective cohort study.
Berger, O; Bou Harfouch, LT; Buresh, ME; Patel, SM; Racha, S, 2023
)
0.91
" The study had no major adverse events including in-hospital or thirty-day post-discharge overdoses or deaths."( Safety of rapid inpatient methadone initiation protocol: A retrospective cohort study.
Berger, O; Bou Harfouch, LT; Buresh, ME; Patel, SM; Racha, S, 2023
)
0.91
" While various harm reduction interventions address overdose-related risks, there is growing interest in safer supply programs, including the MySafe Project which utilizes a biometric dispensing machine that provides pharmaceutical opioid alternatives to the toxic drug supply."( Community partner perspectives on the implementation of a novel safer supply program in Canada: a qualitative study of the MySafe Project.
Bardwell, G; Foreman-Mackey, A; Ivsins, A; Mansoor, M, 2023
)
0.91
" In addition, some participants perceived hydromorphone to be an inadequate substitute to the increasingly toxic street opioid supply."( Community partner perspectives on the implementation of a novel safer supply program in Canada: a qualitative study of the MySafe Project.
Bardwell, G; Foreman-Mackey, A; Ivsins, A; Mansoor, M, 2023
)
0.91
" Regarding adverse events, nausea occurred in 12."( Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Transdermal Fentanyl and Oral Oxycodone in Opioid-Naïve Patients with Cancer Pain.
Fujimoto, H; Funato, M; Kawana, M; Kiribayashi, M; Kokubun, H; Kondo, M; Kusakabe, A; Miyasato, A; Nagatani, K; Nakamura, K; Ohno, R; Okamoto, K; Onoda, C; Ozeki, A; Suzuki, N, 2023
)
1.15
"Due to concerns over potential interactions between some hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and opioids, we describe adverse event (AE) reports of concomitant use of opioids and DAAs."( Reported adverse events related to use of hepatitis C virus direct-acting antivirals with opioids: 2017-2021.
Collins, M; Conway, B; Dylla, DE; Khan, T; Marcinak, J; Martinez, A; Saget, B, 2023
)
0.91
" Given the fact that these interventions do not directly aim to address toxic drug exposure as the primary vector and cause of acute overdose deaths, public health-oriented "safer drug supply" measures have been initiated in local settings across Canada."( "Safer Drug Supply" Measures in Canada to Reduce the Drug Overdose Fatality Toll: Clarifying Concepts, Practices and Evidence Within a Public Health Intervention Framework.
Fischer, B; Robinson, T, 2023
)
0.91
"Although opioids have been shown to be effective for cancer pain, opioid-induced adverse events (AEs) are common."( Prevalence of opioid-induced adverse events across opioids commonly used for analgesic treatment in Japan: a multicenter prospective longitudinal study.
Arakawa, S; Chiu, SW; Hiratsuka, Y; Hirayama, H; Inoue, A; Ishiki, H; Kosugi, K; Kubo, E; Matsuda, Y; Miyashita, M; Morita, T; Natsume, M; Nishijima, K; Ouchi, K; Sato, M; Satomi, E; Shigeno, T; Shimizu, M; Shimoda, M; Shimoi, T; Tagami, K; Yamaguchi, T; Yokomichi, N, 2023
)
0.91

Pharmacokinetics

The effects of age on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to rocuronium (Org 9426) were studied in 20 elderly (> 70 yr) and 20 younger control patients. The plasma concentration achieving analgesia was not and so further research is needed.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Thereafter, serum levels fell more slowly with an observed half-life (t 1/2) of approximately 10 to 20 min."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl as determined by radioimmunoassay.
Benjamini, E; Eisele, J; Henderson, G; Schleimer, R, 1978
)
0.58
" The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero to 1h, 2h, 3h, tracheal extubation and infinity, the absorption and distribution half-lives, maximum plasma and CSF concentrations, time to the peak concentration of sufentanil, and the fraction of sufentanil that reached the central circulation after epidural administration were assessed."( Comparative absorption and distribution pharmacokinetics of intravenous and epidural sufentanil for major abdominal surgery.
Ionescu, TI; Nuyten, ST; Taverne, RH, 1992
)
0.28
"The pharmacokinetic characteristics of a constant rate methohexitone infusion were studied in young ASA 1 patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery."( [Pharmacokinetics of methohexital given by constant rate intravenous infusion].
Bally, B; Gavend, M; Payen, JF; Serre-Debeauvais, F; Stieglitz, P; Tranchand, B, 1992
)
0.28
"The pharmacokinetic variables of sufentanil were studied in 20 healthy children between two and eight years of age."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in normal children.
Gaudreault, P; Goulet, B; Guay, J; Tang, A; Varin, F, 1992
)
0.28
" The resulting data for the pharmacodynamic parameters of sufentanil were compared with fentanyl parameters that were obtained by reanalysis from an identically conducted, previously published study."( Electroencephalographic quantitation of opioid effect: comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and sufentanil.
Cooke, JE; Scott, JC; Stanski, DR, 1991
)
0.73
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by noncompartmental analysis."( The CSF and plasma pharmacokinetics of sufentanil after intrathecal administration.
Hansdottir, V; Hedner, T; Nordberg, G; Woestenborghs, R, 1991
)
0.28
" Pharmacokinetic parameters of these drugs were obtained by using two-compartment open model and population pharmacokinetics."( [Effects of prostaglandin E1 on vecuronium and fentanyl pharmacokinetics in humans].
Ishii, T; Johno, I; Moriyama, S, 1991
)
0.54
"Fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil have important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences."( Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and rational opioid selection.
Shafer, SL; Varvel, JR, 1991
)
1.72
" Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated by iterative linear least square regression analysis."( The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of Org 9426, a new non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent, in patients anaesthetized with nitrous oxide, halothane and fentanyl.
Agoston, S; Kleef, UW; Kloppenburg, WD; Lambalk, LM; Wierda, JM, 1991
)
0.48
"The pharmacokinetic and the effects of sufentanil (S) and fentanyl (F) on cardiovascular stability, brain swelling, respiratory depression and post operative status were studied in 30 neurosurgical patients (group S, n = 15; group F, n = 15)."( [Clinical and pharmacokinetic comparative study of sufentanil and fentanyl in supratentorial neurosurgery].
Artru, F; Chacornac, R; Charlot, M; Levron, JC; Wasylkiewicz, Y, 1991
)
0.76
" Peak plasma fentanyl concentrations (Fmax) and the time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were comparable in the two groups (0."( Effect of epidural clonidine on analgesia and pharmacokinetics of epidural fentanyl in postoperative patients.
Bonnet, F; Levron, JC; Pluskwa, F; Rostaing, S; Saada, M; Vodinh, J, 1991
)
0.88
" The roles that age, hypothermia, protein binding and drug sequestration may play in changing opioid pharmacokinetic behaviour are examined and suggestions for future research are made."( The pharmacokinetic behaviour of opioids administered during cardiac surgery.
Hall, R, 1991
)
0.28
" The results of our study suggest that this type of anesthesia of prolonged duration is safe as judged by the present pharmacokinetic study."( [Clinical study on total intravenous anesthesia with droperidol, fentanyl and ketamine--3. Pharmacokinetics during prolonged continuous ketamine infusion].
Ishihara, H; Kotani, N; Kudo, M; Kudo, T; Matsuki, A, 1991
)
0.52
" The pharmacokinetic characteristics of [3H]OMF in rats was studied in this paper."( [Pharmacokinetics of [3H]ohmefentanyl in rats].
Chi, ZQ; Jin, WQ; Zhao, GM; Zheng, WJ; Zhou, HY, 1990
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated from the derived compartmental models."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in the elderly surgical patient.
Chang, WJ; Matteo, RS; Ornstein, E; Schwartz, AE; Young, WL, 1990
)
0.28
"Computer-assisted continuous infusion (CACI) is a pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion device that enables physicians to administer intravenous (iv) drugs in a quantitative fashion, specifying a theoretical blood or plasma concentration."( Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of fentanyl: assessment of accuracy.
Bai, SA; Ginsberg, B; Glass, PS; Jacobs, JR; Quill, TJ; Reves, JG; Smith, LR, 1990
)
0.54
"Fentanyl was administered to 21 patients using a computer-controlled infusion pump (CCIP) based on a pharmacokinetic model."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump.
Aziz, N; Scott, JC; Shafer, SL; Varvel, JR, 1990
)
2.05
" The method employs a computer-controlled infusion pump and an algorithm that utilizes individual subject pharmacokinetic parameters predetermined with tailoring bolus opioid doses."( Steady-state infusions of opioids in human volunteers. I. Pharmacokinetic tailoring.
Bjurstrom, R; Chapman, CR; Donaldson, G; Hill, HF; Jacobson, R; Saeger, L, 1990
)
0.28
" Pharmacokinetic differences do not explain the disparity seen in the time courses of EEG drug effect."( Understanding pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics through computer stimulation: I. The comparative clinical profiles of fentanyl and alfentanil.
Ebling, WF; Lee, EN; Stanski, DR, 1990
)
0.49
"The pharmacokinetic properties of propofol given at a constant rate, were studied in 10 children."( [Pediatric anesthesia and pharmacokinetics of propofol administered at a constant rate].
Barale, F; Clément, G; Kantelip, JP; Lassauge, F; Magnin, P; Pequegnot, C; Stimmesse, B; Succi, C; Than, TT, 1990
)
0.28
" Though both volume of distribution and elimination half-life increased in the posttransplantation period, only the decrease in clearance was statistically significant."( Effects of cholestatic hepatic disease and chronic renal failure on alfentanil pharmacokinetics in children.
Brandom, BW; Cook, DR; Davis, JE; Davis, PJ; Scierka, AM; Stiller, RL, 1989
)
0.28
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by a model-independent approach and by curve-fitting."( Pharmacokinetics of alfentanil during and after a fixed rate infusion.
Crul, J; Gasparini, R; Heykants, J; Noorduin, H; Van Beem, H; Van Egmond, J; Van Peer, A; Woestenborghs, R, 1989
)
0.28
" The pharmacokinetic profile of alfentanil was determined in 6 premature infants requiring sedation for medical management or analgesia for stressful intensive-care procedures."( Pharmacokinetics of alfentanil in newborn premature infants and older children.
Cook, DR; Davis, PJ; Guthrie, RD; Killian, A; Scierka, AM; Stiller, RL, 1989
)
0.28
" A three-compartment pharmacokinetic model was fit to the concentration versus time data."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.
Bergstrom, RG; Hudson, RJ; Rosenbloom, M; Sabourin, MA; Strunin, L; Thomson, IR, 1989
)
0.28
" Plasma sufentanil concentrations were best fitted to a bi-exponential curve and the pharmacokinetic variables calculated using a curve stripping program (STRIPE)."( Sufentanil pharmacokinetics in neurosurgical patients.
Bansinath, M; Brous, P; Canter, M; Puig, MM; Scoles, J; Turndorf, H, 1989
)
0.28
" Plasma samples were obtained over a 72-hour period for pharmacokinetic analysis in five patients."( Transdermal fentanyl: pharmacokinetics and preliminary clinical evaluation.
Hameroff, SR; Kramer, TH; Linford, J; Plezia, PM, 1989
)
0.66
"The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of alfentanil were studied in 64 surgical patients."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alfentanil infusions during general anesthesia.
Shafer, A; Sung, ML; White, PF, 1986
)
0.27
" The elderly can show greater sensitivity to opioid drugs which may be related to pharmacokinetic differences."( The pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of a low dose of alfentanil in elderly patients.
Bower, S; Dodson, ME; Kent, AP, 1988
)
0.27
" The use of urethane as an anesthetic in pharmacokinetic studies still persists, particularly in experiments of long duration."( Possible hemodynamic basis to urethane anesthesia-induced reductions in renal clearance.
Gumbleton, M; Nicholls, PJ; Taylor, G,
)
0.13
"The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of high-dose sufentanil (15 micrograms/kg) and oxygen were determined in 20 infants and children undergoing repair of congenital heart defects."( Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of high-dose sufentanil in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery.
Cook, DR; Davin-Robinson, KA; Davis, PJ; Stiller, RL, 1987
)
0.27
" The elimination half-life (T1/2 beta) was 783 +/- 346 min in neonates, significantly longer than the values of 214 +/- 41, 140 +/- 30, and 209 +/- 23 min observed in infants, children, and adolescents, respectively."( Sufentanil pharmacokinetics in pediatric cardiovascular patients.
Davis, DP; de Bruijn, NP; Greeley, WJ, 1987
)
0.27
" The effects of chronic renal failure (CRF) on the pharmacokinetic profile of sufentanil were evaluated in six adolescent patients undergoing renal transplantation, and these findings were compared with data from age-matched control patients with normal renal function who were undergoing other surgical procedures."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in adolescent patients with chronic renal failure.
Brandom, BW; Cook, DR; Davin-Robinson, KA; Davis, PJ; Stiller, RL, 1988
)
0.27
" These changes, in turn, may result in pharmacokinetic alterations in affected patients."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in patients undergoing renal transplantation.
Avitable, M; Butt, K; Casthely, PA; Fyman, PN; Moser, F; Reynolds, JR, 1988
)
0.27
" Elimination half-life and plasma clearance were similar in both groups."( Pharmacokinetics of alfentanil in chronic renal failure.
Chauvin, M; Duvaldestin, P; Lebrault, C; Levron, JC, 1987
)
0.27
" The optimal pharmacokinetic model for alfentanil was an open two-compartment model."( A comparison of alfentanil pharmacokinetics in children and adults.
Lepaul, M; Levron, JC; Loose, JP; Mac Gee, K; Meistelman, C; Saint-Maurice, C, 1987
)
0.27
"The population pharmacokinetic parameters describing the plasma concentration versus time profile of alfentanil in patients undergoing general anesthesia were determined from 614 plasma concentration measurements collected in four previously reported studies with a total of 45 patients."( Population pharmacokinetics of alfentanil: the average dose-plasma concentration relationship and interindividual variability in patients.
Heykants, J; Maitre, PO; Stanski, DR; Thomson, DA; Vozeh, S, 1987
)
0.27
" The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic components of each patient's dose-response relationship were evaluated simultaneously."( Decreased fentanyl and alfentanil dose requirements with age. A simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation.
Scott, JC; Stanski, DR, 1987
)
0.68
" Pharmacokinetic values were independent of dose."( The pharmacokinetics of alfentanil in children.
Goresky, GV; Koren, G; Sabourin, MA; Sale, JP; Strunin, L, 1987
)
0.27
" Recently, the authors completed a population pharmacokinetic analysis of the new opioid alfentanil using the computer program NONMEM."( Evaluating the accuracy of using population pharmacokinetic data to predict plasma concentrations of alfentanil.
Ausems, ME; Maitre, PO; Stanski, DR; Vozeh, S, 1988
)
0.27
" A pharmacokinetic basis is given for alfentanil infusion schemes in patients undergoing routine surgery."( The pharmacokinetic basis of alfentanil infusion.
Geerts, P; Heykants, J; Noorduin, H; Vanden Bussche, G, 1987
)
0.27
"58 litre kg-1, resulting in a terminal half-life of 112 min."( Pharmacokinetics of alfentanil in total i.v. anaesthesia.
Hartvig, P; Nilsson, A; Persson, MP, 1988
)
0.27
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in the three subjects and were in the same range as those reported for volunteers."( Alfentanil pharmacokinetics and metabolism in humans.
Hendrickx, J; Heykants, J; Lauwers, W; Meuldermans, W; Van Craeyvelt, H; Van der Aa, P; Van Peer, A; Vanden Bussche, G; Woestenborghs, R, 1988
)
0.27
" Plasma concentration versus time data were fitted to two- and three-compartment pharmacokinetic models, and clearance, volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss), and elimination half-life were determined."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in neonatal humans and lambs: effects of age.
Fisher, DM; Gauntlett, IS; Hertzka, RE; Kuhls, E; Rudolph, C; Spellman, MJ, 1988
)
0.6
" Pharmacokinetic variables were determined by non-compartmental techniques."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in the elderly.
Fisher, DM; Rosen, JI; Singleton, MA, 1988
)
0.6
" Fentanyl did not alter the elimination half-life of R 8110."( Hypnoanalgesia with R 8110/fentanyl in the dog: pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions.
Degryse, AD; Heykants, J; Lagerweij, E; Michiels, M; Monbaliu, J; Ooms, LA; Van Dijk, P; Woestenborghs, R, 1988
)
1.48
" A pharmacokinetic study was performed of the fentanyl."( [Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered via peridural route in the woman in labor].
Cousin, MT; Garen, C; Lampl, E; Levron, P; Pathier, D, 1986
)
0.85
" Elimination half-life was 6-32 hr (mean +/- SD, 17."( Fentanyl pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic effects in preterm infants during ligation of patent ductus arteriosus.
Collins, C; Crean, P; Klein, J; Koren, G; MacLeod, SM; Roy, WL, 1985
)
1.71
" To accurately relate EEG changes to serum narcotic concentrations, a pharmacodynamic model (inhibitory sigmoid Emax) was combined with a pharmacokinetic model that incorporated an "effect" compartment."( EEG quantitation of narcotic effect: the comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil.
Ponganis, KV; Scott, JC; Stanski, DR, 1985
)
0.5
" The kinetics of the analgesic can be described by a two-compartment model; the elimination half-life has a mean value of 64."( Pharmacokinetic data analysis of alfentanil after multiple injections and etomidate-infusion in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.
Abel, J; Freye, E; Haag, W; Hartung, E; Klatte, A; Richter, O, 1985
)
0.27
" groups showed the same pharmacokinetic pattern."( Clinical assessment and plasma pharmacokinetics associated with intramuscular or extradural alfentanil.
Chauvin, M; Levron, JC; Perrin, D; Salbaing, J; Viars, P, 1985
)
0.27
"The accuracy of using average alfentanil pharmacokinetic data in a computer assisted infusion pump (TIAC) to predict alfentanil plasma concentrations was tested in 35 patients (divided into three groups) receiving alfentanil and nitrous oxide in oxygen anaesthesia for lower and upper abdominal surgery."( An evaluation of the accuracy of pharmacokinetic data for the computer assisted infusion of alfentanil.
Ausems, ME; Hug, CC; Stanski, DR, 1985
)
0.27
"38 ml X kg-1 X min-1; and terminal elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta), 317 +/- 70 min."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in neonates.
Brundage, DM; Buckley, JJ; Hegland, MG; Koehntop, DE; Rodman, JH, 1986
)
0.59
" A three-compartment pharmacokinetic model was fit to the concentration versus time data."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.
Cannon, JE; Friesen, RM; Hudson, RJ; Meatherall, RC; Thomson, IR, 1986
)
0.59
"9 ng/ml at 5, 15, and 30 min postbolus, respectively, with an elimination phase half-life of 35."( Cardiovascular and pharmacodynamic effects of high-dose fentanyl in newborn piglets.
Cook, DR; Schieber, RA; Stiller, RL, 1985
)
0.52
"The derived pharmacokinetic data for the intravenous administration of fentanyl obtained from seven previous studies were compared using computer simulation of predicted plasma concentrations following three intravenous dosage regimens."( Variability of fentanyl pharmacokinetics in man. Computer predicted plasma concentrations for three intravenous dosage regimens.
Reilly, CS; Wood, AJ; Wood, M, 1985
)
0.86
" In a case of end stage renal failure, the pharmacokinetic parameters during cardiac surgery were similar to 18 children from the same age group with normal renal function."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in children with renal disease.
Crean, P; Goresky, GV; Klein, J; Koren, G; MacLeod, SM, 1984
)
0.59
"In 7 patients (ASA class I and II) the pharmacokinetic behaviour after bolus injection of alfentanyl was investigated."( [Clinical pharmacokinetics of alfentanyl (author's transl)].
Schüttler, J; Stoeckel, H, 1982
)
0.77
" For both analgesics, the pharmacokinetic profile in man could be described by a three-compartment model."( Radioimmunoassay of the new opiate analgesics alfentanil and sufentanil. Preliminary pharmacokinetic profile in man.
Hendriks, R; Heykants, J; Michiels, M, 1983
)
0.27
" Recent developments in analytical techniques have allowed pharmacokinetic studies and these have confirmed this opinion; fentanyl is rightly regarded as having a redistribution-limited duration of action after single or infrequent doses (analogous to thiopentone)."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and its newer derivatives.
Mather, LE,
)
0.63
" The average terminal elimination (beta) half-life was 164 +/- 22 min."( The pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in surgical patients.
Blackburn, CL; Bovill, JG; Heykants, JJ; Oei-Lim, V; Sebel, PS, 1984
)
0.27
" The distribution half-life (mean +/- SD) (7."( Pharmacokinetics of the infusion of alfentanil in man.
Booij, LH; Braak, GJ; Crul, JF; Fragen, RJ; Heykants, J; Vree, TB, 1983
)
0.27
" Plasma concentrations of the drug peaked at 10 micrograms/ml and decreased rapidly at first, and then more slowly, with an apparent beta-phase half-life of 18."( Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and behavioral effects of caffeine in horses.
Greene, EW; Tobin, T; Woods, WE, 1983
)
0.27
" Dosage rules based on pharmacokinetic principles, for repeated administration and infusion are outlined for the induction, maintenance and termination of anaesthesia."( [Principles of clinical pharmacokinetics in anaesthesiology (author's transl)].
Lauven, PM; Schüttler, J; Schwilden, H; Stoeckel, H, 1982
)
0.26
"The authors carried out a quantitative assessment of pharmacodynamic effects of droperidol (5 and 25 mg/kg) and phentanyl (0."( [Pharmacodynamics of the interaction of neuroleptanalgetics].
Dimitriadi, NA; Karkishchenko, NN; Khoron'ko, VV; Tarakanov, AV,
)
0.13
" Plasma fentanyl concentrations declined bi-exponentially in the controls with an average elimination half-life (T1/2 beta) of 263 min; total plasma clearance (Cl) as 10."( Fentanyl pharmacokinetics in anaesthetized patients with cirrhosis.
Couderc, E; Duvaldestin, P; Haberer, JP; Schoeffler, P, 1982
)
2.14
" Evaluation of pharmacokinetic data from experiments using nine dogs revealed a triphasic phenomenon."( Determination of plasma fentanyl by GC-mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetic analysis.
Caprioli, RM; Lin, SN; Mo, BP; Wang, TP, 1981
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic studies have suggested that abdominal surgery in neonates decreases fentanyl clearance, contending that this results from increases in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) decreasing hepatic blood flow."( Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on hepatic extraction and clearance of fentanyl in neonatal lambs.
Brown, R; Fisher, DM; Gauntlett, IS; Kuhls, E; Lau, M; Rudolph, CD; Teitel, DF, 1995
)
0.74
" To demonstrate that inhalation of a mixture of free and liposome-encapsulated fentanyl can provide a rapid increase and sustained plasma fentanyl concentrations (CfenS), this study determined the pharmacokinetic profiles after the inhalation of free and liposome-encapsulated fentanyl in healthy volunteers."( Pharmacokinetics of inhaled liposome-encapsulated fentanyl.
Hung, OR; Mezei, M; Shafer, SL; Varvel, JR; Whynot, SC, 1995
)
0.77
"33 hours every hour, respectively), the area under the serum fentanyl concentration curve appeared to be independent of the time of infusion."( Evaluation of diurnal variation in fentanyl clearance.
Gupta, SK; Hwang, SS; Southam, MA, 1995
)
0.81
"The objectives of this investigation were to characterize the disposition of fentanyl and alfentanil in 14 tissues in the rat, and to create physiological pharmacokinetic models for these opioids that would be scalable to man."( Comparative physiological pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil in rats and humans based on parametric single-tissue models.
Björkman, S; Ebling, WF; Stanski, DR; Wada, DR, 1994
)
0.78
"min-1, was infused for 10 min, venous blood sampled for 60 min, and twitch tension and plasma concentration data were used to determine pharmacodynamic variables in each patient."( Mild intraoperative hypothermia does not change the pharmacodynamics (concentration-effect relationship) of vecuronium in humans.
Caldwell, JE; Gruenke, LD; Heier, T; Miller, RD; Sharma, ML, 1994
)
0.29
" We investigated the role of each of these primary pharmacokinetic parameters to determine values of each that would contribute to rapid recovery after various dosing schemes."( Pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to recovery from opioids.
Shafer, SL; Youngs, EJ, 1994
)
0.29
" Set I predicted the change in plasma concentration of each drug after a bolus if each pharmacokinetic parameter were independently increased by 5%."( Pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to recovery from opioids.
Shafer, SL; Youngs, EJ, 1994
)
0.29
"This study proposes qualitative guidelines for pharmacokinetic properties desirable in anesthetic drugs."( Pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to recovery from opioids.
Shafer, SL; Youngs, EJ, 1994
)
0.29
" Pharmacokinetic analysis showed no significant differences for rocuronium during the 3 anesthetic techniques."( Clinical pharmacology of rocuronium (Org 9426): study of the time course of action, dose requirement, reversibility, and pharmacokinetics.
Hennis, PJ; Leclercq, MG; Smeulers, NJ; van den Broek, L; van Santen, GJ; Wierda, JM,
)
0.13
" The current study was undertaken to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of the individual stereoisomers of mivacurium, to evaluate the dose-proportionality of the more potent trans-trans and cis-trans isomers, and to evaluate the pharmacodynamics of mivacurium in healthy adult patients receiving a consecutive two-step infusion of mivacurium."( The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the stereoisomers of mivacurium in patients receiving nitrous oxide/opioid/barbiturate anesthesia.
Belmont, MR; Embree, PB; Lien, CA; Savarese, JJ; Schmith, VD; Wargin, WA, 1994
)
0.29
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental analysis."( The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the stereoisomers of mivacurium in patients receiving nitrous oxide/opioid/barbiturate anesthesia.
Belmont, MR; Embree, PB; Lien, CA; Savarese, JJ; Schmith, VD; Wargin, WA, 1994
)
0.29
" The only significant difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters was the shortened elimination half-life in patients between 1 and 3 years of age."( Pharmacokinetics of glycopyrrolate in children.
Ali-Melkkilä, T; Iisalo, E; Kaila, T; Kanto, J; Olkkola, KT; Rautakorpi, P,
)
0.13
" The shortened elimination half-life in children between 1 and 3 years of age is of minor clinical importance."( Pharmacokinetics of glycopyrrolate in children.
Ali-Melkkilä, T; Iisalo, E; Kaila, T; Kanto, J; Olkkola, KT; Rautakorpi, P,
)
0.13
"The effects of age on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to rocuronium (Org 9426) were studied in 20 elderly (> 70 yr) and 20 younger control patients (< 60 yr) during N2O/O2, fentanyl anesthesia."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rocuronium (Org 9426) in elderly surgical patients.
Matteo, RS; Ornstein, E; Ostapkovich, N; Schwartz, AE; Stone, JG, 1993
)
0.48
"5 h Tmax was observed."( In vivo iontophoresis of fentanyl and sufentanil in rats: pharmacokinetics and acute antinociceptive effects.
Préat, V; Thysman, S, 1993
)
0.59
" Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic variables, total body clearance, volume of distribution at steady state, and terminal elimination half-life were calculated."( Pharmacokinetics of continuous infusions of fentanyl in critically ill children.
Katz, R; Kelly, HW, 1993
)
0.55
"5) and the terminal elimination half-life was prolonged 21."( Pharmacokinetics of continuous infusions of fentanyl in critically ill children.
Katz, R; Kelly, HW, 1993
)
0.55
"We compared the pharmacodynamic effects and hospital costs of three long-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs in a prospective, randomized, double-blind manner."( Hemodynamic and pharmacodynamic comparison of doxacurium and pipecuronium with pancuronium during induction of cardiac anesthesia: does the benefit justify the cost?
Brooker, RF; Butterworth, JF; Gravlee, GP; Prielipp, RC; Rathmell, JP, 1993
)
0.29
" Following removal of the system, the mean (SD) apparent half-life was 21."( Transdermal fentanyl for cancer pain. Repeated dose pharmacokinetics.
Foley, KM; Gupta, SK; Inturrisi, CE; Lapin, J; Layman, M; Portenoy, RK; Southam, MA, 1993
)
0.66
" The apparent half-life following system removal is relatively long, indicating ongoing absorption from a subcutaneous depot."( Transdermal fentanyl for cancer pain. Repeated dose pharmacokinetics.
Foley, KM; Gupta, SK; Inturrisi, CE; Lapin, J; Layman, M; Portenoy, RK; Southam, MA, 1993
)
0.66
" The overall mean elimination half-life was 182 min, Vdss 169 l and the plasma clearance 910 ml min-1."( Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in general surgical patients under different conditions of anaesthesia.
Gasparini, R; Lehmann, KA; Sipakis, K; van Peer, A, 1993
)
0.29
" The concentration-time data were analyzed by noncompartmental methods and subsequently linked to the pharmacodynamic effect data by a competitive antagonism link model."( Duration of opioid antagonism by nalmefene and naloxone in the dog: an integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison.
Osifchin, E; Veng-Pedersen, P; Waters, SJ; Wilhelm, JA; Zakszewski, TB, 1995
)
0.29
"The opioid antagonist nalmefene was compared in its pharmacodynamic properties to the structurally similar antagonist naloxone in a 2 x 2 cross-over study with 8 dogs."( Duration of opioid antagonism by nalmefene and naloxone in the dog. A nonparametric pharmacodynamic comparison based on generalized cross-validated spline estimation.
Osifchin, E; Veng-Pedersen, P; Waters, SJ; Wilhelm, JA; Zakszewski, TB, 1995
)
0.29
" For each drug, an effect compartment pharmacodynamic model was fit to the values for minute ventilation to determine the steady-state opioid plasma concentration depressing ventilation by 50% (C50) and the rate constant for equilibration between plasma concentration and effect (keo)."( Opioid pharmacodynamics in neonatal dogs: differences between morphine and fentanyl.
Bragg, P; Fisher, DM; Lau, M; Zwass, MS, 1995
)
0.52
" Pharmacokinetic parameters for fentanyl were not significantly altered by the route of administration."( Intratracheal administration of fentanyl: pharmacokinetics and local tissue effects.
Ahmed, ST; Ahmed, U; Anand, KJ; Gancayco, A; Irazuzta, JE; Zhang, J, 1996
)
0.86
" Important pharmacokinetic differences between alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil have been shown in many reports."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil. An update.
Scholz, J; Schulz, M; Steinfath, M, 1996
)
0.8
" Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured and used to evaluate the performance of the fentanyl pharmacokinetics and then to determine a new set of pharmacokinetic parameters and the variance in the context-sensitive half-times simulated for these patients."( Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of fentanyl in children.
Dear, GL; Ginsberg, B; Glass, PS; Howell, S; Margolis, JO; Ross, AK; Shafer, SL, 1996
)
0.99
" A two-compartment model with age and weight as covariates provided the optimal pharmacokinetic parameters."( Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of fentanyl in children.
Dear, GL; Ginsberg, B; Glass, PS; Howell, S; Margolis, JO; Ross, AK; Shafer, SL, 1996
)
0.56
"Although fentanyl administration by continuous infusion in newborns during ventilatory support has increased, pharmacokinetic data are lacking."( Pharmacokinetics of continuous infusion fentanyl in newborns.
Christie, J; Markowsky, SJ; Santeiro, ML; Stromquist, C; Torres, BA,
)
0.82
" An effect compartment pharmacodynamic model was fit to the values for time to response to determine the rate constant for equilibration (Keo) between plasma and effect-site (Ce) concentrations and analgesic effect (increase in time to response to a noxious stimulus) above baseline per microgram/ml of Ce (delta)."( Opioid-induced analgesia in neonatal dogs: pharmacodynamic differences between morphine and fentanyl.
Brown, RC; Chari, G; Fisher, DM; Lau, M; Luks, AM; Zwass, MS, 1998
)
0.52
" Maximum concentration, time to maximum concentration, area under the curve, and elimination half-life were determined for each dose administered."( Dose proportionality and pharmacokinetics of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Busch, MA; Egan, TD; Gay, M; Pace, NL; Smith, BG; Streisand, JB, 1998
)
0.54
" Except for the 200-microg dose, the apparent elimination half-life remained relatively constant (358-386 min)."( Dose proportionality and pharmacokinetics of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Busch, MA; Egan, TD; Gay, M; Pace, NL; Smith, BG; Streisand, JB, 1998
)
0.54
"5 Hz frequency band of the electroencephalogram (EEG) was used as pharmacodynamic endpoint."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the electroencephalogram effect of synthetic opioids in the rat: correlation with the interaction at the mu-opioid receptor.
Cox, EH; Danhof, M; Kerbusch, T; Van der Graaf, PH, 1998
)
0.3
" The aims of this study were to determine whether physiologic pharmacokinetic models for fentanyl and alfentanil, based on data from rats, could predict plasma concentrations of these opioids in humans and to determine how changes in physiology would influence the predictions of their disposition."( Application of physiologic models to predict the influence of changes in body composition and blood flows on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil in patients.
Björkman, S; Stanski, DR; Wada, DR, 1998
)
0.73
"The predictions of the models were tested against plasma concentration data from published pharmacokinetic studies."( Application of physiologic models to predict the influence of changes in body composition and blood flows on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil in patients.
Björkman, S; Stanski, DR; Wada, DR, 1998
)
0.5
" From the pharmacokinetic point of view, PFK may be safely applied even for neonates."( [Clinical indication of propofol for pediatric patients--pharmacokinetics of propofol and ketamine during and after total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, fentanyl and ketamine (PFK) in a neonate].
Komoda, Y; Kudo, M; Kudo, T; Matsuki, A; Mi, WD; Sakai, T, 1998
)
0.5
" The pharmacokinetic differences may be related to the differences in the sensitivity to vecuronium between genders."( The pharmacokinetics of vecuronium in male and female patients.
An, G; Liao, X; Luo, LK; Xue, FS; Zou, Q, 1998
)
0.3
"The objective of this study was to determine hemodynamic effects and pharmacokinetic profiles of fentanyl with continuous infusion in 1- to 3-day-old newborn piglets."( Pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetic profile of continuous infusion fentanyl in newborn piglets.
Beharry, KD; Modanlou, HD; Rajan, V; Williams, P, 1998
)
0.75
" A loading dose based on the Vd at the tmax will accurately achieve the concentration at the tmax without unexpected adverse effects."( Determination of the distribution volume that can be used to calculate the intravenous loading dose.
Drover, DR; Lemmens, HJ; Wada, DR, 1998
)
0.3
" Fentanyl pharmacokinetics with either E-TRANS (fentanyl) or intravenous infusion were time-invariant over a 24-h application period, with similar mean half-life values (about 15-18 h)."( Effect of current density on pharmacokinetics following continuous or intermittent input from a fentanyl electrotransport system.
Gupta, SK; Klausner, M; Sathyan, G; Southam, M, 1998
)
1.43
" The goal of this study was to characterize the pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and fentanyl with respect to the suppression of somatic or hemodynamic responses after three stimuli: skin incision, peritoneum incision, and abdominal wall retraction."( The pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and fentanyl with respect to the suppression of somatic or hemodynamic responses to skin incision, peritoneum incision, and abdominal wall retraction.
Ikeda, K; Kazama, T; Morita, K, 1998
)
0.77
" There were no differences in the time at which maximum plasma concentrations occurred (tmax), elimination half-life after patch removal, or AUC(0-infinity)."( Perioperative pharmacokinetics of transdermal fentanyl in elderly and young adult patients.
Bower, S; Liddle, AM; Rowbotham, DJ; Thompson, JP, 1998
)
0.56
" (2) To estimate the pediatric pharmacokinetic parameters of TTS-fentanyl."( Transdermal fentanyl in children with cancer pain: feasibility, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic correlates.
Collins, JJ; Dunkel, IJ; Gupta, SK; Inturrisi, CE; Lapin, J; Palmer, LN; Portenoy, RK; Weinstein, SM, 1999
)
0.92
" Compared with published pharmacokinetic data from adults, the mean clearance and volume of distribution of transdermal fentanyl were the same, but the variability was less."( Transdermal fentanyl in children with cancer pain: feasibility, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic correlates.
Collins, JJ; Dunkel, IJ; Gupta, SK; Inturrisi, CE; Lapin, J; Palmer, LN; Portenoy, RK; Weinstein, SM, 1999
)
0.89
"Treatment of children with TTS-fentanyl is feasible and well tolerated and yields fentanyl pharmacokinetic parameter estimates similar to those for adults."( Transdermal fentanyl in children with cancer pain: feasibility, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic correlates.
Collins, JJ; Dunkel, IJ; Gupta, SK; Inturrisi, CE; Lapin, J; Palmer, LN; Portenoy, RK; Weinstein, SM, 1999
)
0.97
" Each animal's pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by fitting a three-compartment model to the concentration versus time data Nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic models examining the influence of mean arterial pressure and cardiac index were also constructed."( Fentanyl pharmacokinetics in hemorrhagic shock: a porcine model.
Bailey, PL; Egan, TD; Gong, G; Kuramkote, S; McJames, SW; Zhang, J, 1999
)
1.75
" The most useful population model scaled all pharmacokinetic parameters to mean arterial pressure."( Fentanyl pharmacokinetics in hemorrhagic shock: a porcine model.
Bailey, PL; Egan, TD; Gong, G; Kuramkote, S; McJames, SW; Zhang, J, 1999
)
1.75
" The reduced opioid requirement commonly observed during hemorrhagic shock is at least partially attributable to pharmacokinetic mechanisms."( Fentanyl pharmacokinetics in hemorrhagic shock: a porcine model.
Bailey, PL; Egan, TD; Gong, G; Kuramkote, S; McJames, SW; Zhang, J, 1999
)
1.75
" Pharmacokinetic values were calculated, using a computerized modeling program."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after intravenous and transdermal administration in goats.
Boothe, DM; Carroll, GL; Hartsfield, SM; Hooper, RN; Randoll, LA, 1999
)
0.63
"5 microg/kg) in goats results in a relatively short half-life that will limit its use for management of pain."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after intravenous and transdermal administration in goats.
Boothe, DM; Carroll, GL; Hartsfield, SM; Hooper, RN; Randoll, LA, 1999
)
0.63
" The slowing of the EEG to a median power frequency of 2 Hz to 3 Hz was chosen as the measure of pharmacodynamic drug effect."( Isoflurane, nitrous oxide, and fentanyl pharmacodynamic interactions in surgical patients as measured by effects on median power frequency.
Hoeft, A; Lier, H; Röpcke, H; Schwilden, H, 1999
)
0.59
" This review analyses the pharmacokinetic properties of transdermal opioid administration in the context of clinical experience, with a focus on fentanyl."( Clinical pharmacokinetics of transdermal opioids: focus on transdermal fentanyl.
Grond, S; Lehmann, KA; Radbruch, L, 2000
)
0.74
" The descriptive pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum concentration, minimum concentration, and time to maximum concentration) were identified from the raw data and subjected to a nonparametric analysis of variance."( Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers.
Ashburn, MA; Egan, TD; Kievit, J; Pace, NL; Sharma, A; Streisand, JB, 2000
)
0.56
" A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model adequately represented the central tendency of the data from all subjects."( Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers.
Ashburn, MA; Egan, TD; Kievit, J; Pace, NL; Sharma, A; Streisand, JB, 2000
)
0.56
" Using SAAM II pharmacokinetic modeling software (SAAM Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA), the data were fit to a 16-compartment model that was divided into four spinal levels, each of which consisted of a caternary arrangement of four compartments representing the spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid, epidural space, and epidural fat."( Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil.
Arends, RH; Bernards, CM; Shen, DD; Ummenhofer, WC, 2000
)
0.53
"The four opioids studied demonstrate markedly different pharmacokinetic behavior, which correlates well with their pharmacodynamic behavior."( Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil.
Arends, RH; Bernards, CM; Shen, DD; Ummenhofer, WC, 2000
)
0.53
"The pharmacodynamic differences in time to onset and dissipation of effect of sufentanil, fentanyl, and alfentanil probably result from different rates of blood-brain equilibration."( Pharmacokinetics of human cerebral opioid extraction: a comparative study on sufentanil, fentanyl, and alfentanil in a patient after severe head injury.
Göbel, L; Gruber, M; Hoerauf, KH; Metz, C; Taeger, K, 2000
)
0.75
"To compare pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fentanyl citrate after IV or transdermal administration in cats."( Comparison of pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after intravenous and transdermal administration in cats.
Hardie, EM; Lee, DD; Papich, MG, 2000
)
0.82
" Pharmacokinetic analyses of plasma drug concentrations were conducted, using an automated curve-stripping process followed by nonlinear, least-squares regression."( Comparison of pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after intravenous and transdermal administration in cats.
Hardie, EM; Lee, DD; Papich, MG, 2000
)
0.59
" The clearance, volume of distribution area, volume of distribution steady state, mean residence time, area under the curve, elimination rate constant, and half-life were 32."( Pharmacokinetics and cardiopulmonary effects of fentanyl in isoflurane-anesthetized rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Baggot, JD; Kollias-Baker, C; Mama, KR; Steffey, EP; Valverde, CR, 2000
)
0.56
" The use of ketamine as an anaesthetic agent in rabbits is questionable, while the use of fentanyl in pigs, methohexitone in rats and ketamine in rats and pigs is well supported by the pharmacokinetic data."( Clearance of fentanyl, alfentanil, methohexitone, thiopentone and ketamine in relation to estimated hepatic blood flow in several animal species: application to prediction of clearance in man.
Björkman, S; Redke, F, 2000
)
0.9
" The pharmacokinetic properties of fentanyl administered as a single 5 ug/kg intravenous infusion were evaluated in 18 healthy volunteers by use of SIM as well as with NPEM."( Population pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in healthy volunteers.
Ariano, RE; Duke, PC; Sitar, DS, 2001
)
0.87
" Therefore, we aimed to define a pharmacokinetic model that accurately predicts fentanyl concentrations before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)."( Validation of fentanyl pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Harding, G; Henderson, BT; Hudson, RJ; Peterson, DJ; Singh, K; Thomson, IR, 2002
)
0.9
"Parameters for two-compartment and three-compartment models were estimated by applying population pharmacokinetic modelling to fentanyl concentration vs time data measured in 29 patients undergoing elective, primary CABG."( Validation of fentanyl pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Harding, G; Henderson, BT; Hudson, RJ; Peterson, DJ; Singh, K; Thomson, IR, 2002
)
0.88
"Our pharmacokinetic model provides a rational foundation for designing fentanyl dose regimens for patients undergoing CABG."( Validation of fentanyl pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Harding, G; Henderson, BT; Hudson, RJ; Peterson, DJ; Singh, K; Thomson, IR, 2002
)
0.91
"0 microg/ml, and the half-life may be longer than previously reported values in adult patients."( Pharmacokinetics of propofol in elderly coronary artery bypass graft patients under total intravenous anesthesia.
Morikawa, N; Noguchi, T; Oishi, K; Takeyama, M, 2002
)
0.31
" We previously examined pharmacokinetic parameters of children who had completed consumption of the Fentanyl Oralet."( Uptake pharmacokinetics of the Fentanyl Oralet in children scheduled for central venous access removal: implications for the timing of initiating painful procedures.
Avram, MJ; Birmingham, PK; Coté, CJ; Dsida, RM; Wang, Z; Wheeler, M, 2002
)
0.82
" This led to a relatively late and variable peak concentration time of 53 +/- 40 min."( Uptake pharmacokinetics of the Fentanyl Oralet in children scheduled for central venous access removal: implications for the timing of initiating painful procedures.
Avram, MJ; Birmingham, PK; Coté, CJ; Dsida, RM; Wang, Z; Wheeler, M, 2002
)
0.6
" However, the variability of the time to peak concentration makes it difficult to suggest a minimum interval between Fentanyl Oralet consumption and the start of a painful procedure."( Uptake pharmacokinetics of the Fentanyl Oralet in children scheduled for central venous access removal: implications for the timing of initiating painful procedures.
Avram, MJ; Birmingham, PK; Coté, CJ; Dsida, RM; Wang, Z; Wheeler, M, 2002
)
0.81
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental analysis."( Simultaneous assessment of drug interactions with low- and high-extraction opioids: application to parecoxib effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil.
Feldman, J; Ibrahim, AE; Karim, A; Kharasch, ED, 2003
)
0.51
"Although the pharmacodynamics of fentanyl have not been investigated fully in horses, transdermally-administered fentanyl exhibited a favourable pharmacokinetic profile without clinically relevant side effects and may be a useful analgesic in equine patients."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl following intravenous and transdermal administration in horses.
Kollias-Baker, C; Maxwell, LK; Slovis, N; Thomasy, SM, 2003
)
0.92
" There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in either the time to peak concentration (Tmax) or the mean residence time (MRT)."( A pharmacokinetic study to compare two simultaneous 400 microg doses with a single 800 microg dose of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Egan, TD; Kern, SE; Kisicki, JC; Lee, M, 2003
)
0.53
"Although fentanyl has been widely used in cardiac anesthesia, no complete pharmacokinetic model that has assessed the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and that has adequate predictive accuracy has been defined."( Cardiopulmonary bypass has minimal effects on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in adults.
Brown, AD; Freedman, JI; Hudson, RJ; Jassal, R; Peterson, DJ; Thomson, IR, 2003
)
0.97
"Population pharmacokinetic modeling was applied to concentration-versus-time data from 61 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using CPB."( Cardiopulmonary bypass has minimal effects on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in adults.
Brown, AD; Freedman, JI; Hudson, RJ; Jassal, R; Peterson, DJ; Thomson, IR, 2003
)
0.55
"Compared to other factors that cause pharmacokinetic variability, the effect of CPB on fentanyl kinetics is clinically insignificant."( Cardiopulmonary bypass has minimal effects on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in adults.
Brown, AD; Freedman, JI; Hudson, RJ; Jassal, R; Peterson, DJ; Thomson, IR, 2003
)
0.78
" The objective of this study was to further evaluate the pharmacokinetic effect of local heat administration on fentanyl drug delivery through the transdermal fentanyl patch delivery system in volunteers."( The pharmacokinetics of transdermal fentanyl delivered with and without controlled heat.
Ashburn, MA; Basta, SV; Love, G; Ogden, LL; Zhang, J, 2003
)
0.8
" Using the patient's response to a large-dose fentanyl infusion in conjunction with a pharmacokinetic simulation, effective intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl plasma concentrations were achieved."( Preoperative fentanyl infusion with pharmacokinetic simulation for anesthetic and perioperative management of an opioid-tolerant patient.
Davis, JJ; Egan, TD; Johnson, KB; Snell, TE; Swenson, JD; Vezina, DP, 2003
)
0.95
"A preinduction fentanyl infusion used in conjunction with pharmacokinetic simulation can be a useful tool for assessing individual limits of opioid tolerance, as well as determining an appropriate dose for acute pain management in opioid-tolerant patients."( Preoperative fentanyl infusion with pharmacokinetic simulation for anesthetic and perioperative management of an opioid-tolerant patient.
Davis, JJ; Egan, TD; Johnson, KB; Snell, TE; Swenson, JD; Vezina, DP, 2003
)
1.04
"Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models can be used to predict drug disposition in humans from animal data and the influence of disease or other changes in physiology on the pharmacokinetics of a drug."( Reduction and lumping of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: prediction of the disposition of fentanyl and pethidine in humans by successively simplified models.
Björkman, S, 2003
)
0.53
" A comparison is also presented between several methods based on animal pharmacokinetic data, using the same set of proprietary compounds, and it lends further support for the use of this method, as opposed to methods that require the gathering of pharmacokinetic data in laboratory animals."( Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
Gao, F; Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Shalaeva, MY, 2004
)
0.32
" The elimination half-life of ropivacaine was significantly less than that of bupivacaine (5."( [Clinical effects and pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia during labor].
Barros Núñez, C; Cánovas Martínez, L; Castro Méndez, A; Gallardo, E; González González, D; López Piñeiro, S, 2004
)
0.32
"The currently available pharmacokinetic models for fentanyl were derived from normal weight patients and were not scaled to body weight."( Accuracy of pharmacokinetic models for predicting plasma fentanyl concentrations in lean and obese surgical patients: derivation of dosing weight ("pharmacokinetic mass").
Bairamian, M; Inchiosa, MA; Sawada, K; Shibutani, K, 2004
)
0.82
"Plasma fentanyl and norfentanyl concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters did not differ between younger and older subjects."( Influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Hoffer, C; Kharasch, ED; Whittington, D, 2004
)
1
" We hypothesized that administering an oral fentanyl solution to children would result in similar fentanyl plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic variables as administering comparable doses of OTFC."( The pharmacokinetics of the intravenous formulation of fentanyl citrate administered orally in children undergoing general anesthesia.
Birmingham, PK; Coté, CJ; Heffner, CL; Lugo, RA; Wheeler, M, 2004
)
0.83
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartment analysis."( Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of different doses of fentanyl following sublingual administration of a rapidly dissolving tablet to cancer patients: a new approach to treatment of incident pain.
Bredenberg, S; Hedner, T; Holmberg, M; Lennernäs, B; Lennernäs, H; Nyström, C, 2005
)
0.57
" For fentanyl, the pharmacokinetics was described on the basis of a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats: role of receptor equilibration kinetics.
Dahan, A; Danhof, M; Olofsen, E; Yassen, A, 2005
)
1.06
"Human pharmacokinetic parameters are often predicted prior to clinical study from in vivo preclinical pharmacokinetic data."( Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
Jolivette, LJ; Ward, KW, 2005
)
0.33
"Fentanyl is an opioid drug widely used as a co-adjuvant in abdominal delivery, a fact that justifies its pharmacokinetic study under these conditions."( Pharmacokinetics and transplacental distribution of fentanyl in epidural anesthesia for normal pregnant women.
da Cunha, SP; de Barros Duarte, L; de Carvalho Cavalli, R; Duarte, G; Lanchote, VL; Moisés, EC, 2005
)
2.02
" Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the bi- or tri-compartmental model."( Pharmacokinetics and transplacental distribution of fentanyl in epidural anesthesia for normal pregnant women.
da Cunha, SP; de Barros Duarte, L; de Carvalho Cavalli, R; Duarte, G; Lanchote, VL; Moisés, EC, 2005
)
0.58
"The values of the pharmacokinetic parameters were: t(1/2)alpha=13."( Pharmacokinetics and transplacental distribution of fentanyl in epidural anesthesia for normal pregnant women.
da Cunha, SP; de Barros Duarte, L; de Carvalho Cavalli, R; Duarte, G; Lanchote, VL; Moisés, EC, 2005
)
0.58
" In this study, we examined the relationships among fentanyl doses needed to achieve postoperative analgesia, corresponding plasma fentanyl concentrations, and pharmacokinetic mass in lean and obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery."( Pharmacokinetic mass of fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in lean and obese patients.
Bairamian, M; Inchiosa, MA; Sawada, K; Shibutani, K, 2005
)
0.89
"The relationship between dose and pharmacokinetic mass, compared with that of dose vs TBW, may provide confidence for the use of pharmacokinetic mass as a dosing approximation for fentanyl."( Pharmacokinetic mass of fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in lean and obese patients.
Bairamian, M; Inchiosa, MA; Sawada, K; Shibutani, K, 2005
)
0.83
" Large patient-to-patient variations in pharmacokinetic parameters occurred, although intraindividual variability was limited."( Inter- and intraindividual variabilities in pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after repeated 72-hour transdermal applications in cancer pain patients.
Bressolle, F; Caumette, L; Culine, S; Garcia, F; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Solassol, I, 2005
)
0.57
" Pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum serum fentanyl concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) and terminal half-life (t(1/2)), were determined for each treatment."( Characterisation of the pharmacokinetics of the fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS): effect of current magnitude and multiple-day dosing and comparison with IV fentanyl administration.
Evashenk, M; Gupta, S; Jaskowiak, J; Sathyan, G, 2005
)
0.83
" Pharmacokinetic parameters, including maximum serum fentanyl concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (tmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) and terminal half-life (t(1/2)) were determined."( The effect of dosing frequency on the pharmacokinetics of a fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS).
Gidwani, S; Gupta, S; Sathyan, G; Zomorodi, K, 2005
)
0.82
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for the fentanyl HCl PCTS, and results were analysed using ANOVA."( Effects of application site and subject demographics on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS).
Gupta, SK; Hwang, S; Sathyan, G; Southam, M, 2005
)
0.81
" However, both Cmax and AUC24-25 were less when the system was applied to the lower inner arm (0."( Effects of application site and subject demographics on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS).
Gupta, SK; Hwang, S; Sathyan, G; Southam, M, 2005
)
0.56
" The increase in Cmax was 20% less than proportional at the 1080microg dose."( Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets in healthy volunteers.
Darwish, M; Kirby, M; Tempero, K; Thompson, J, 2005
)
0.59
" This high early tmax contributed to enhanced early systemic fentanyl exposure."( Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets in healthy volunteers.
Darwish, M; Kirby, M; Tempero, K; Thompson, J, 2005
)
0.83
"To determine the plasma concentration and define the pharmacokinetic characteristics of fentanyl (10 microg kg(-1)) administered as a single intravenous (IV) injection followed by: (a) no further drug; or (b) a constant rate infusion (CRI) of fentanyl 10 microg kg(-1) hour(-1) lasting 1, 3 or 4 hours in dogs."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after single intravenous injection and constant rate infusion in dogs.
Igarashi, E; Kanazawa, H; Mochizuki, M; Nagata, Y; Nishimura, R; Sano, T; Sasaki, N, 2006
)
0.88
" Plasma pharmacokinetic estimates were obtained by plotting plasma concentrations versus time data and by fitting the change in concentration to a pharmacokinetic model, using a purpose-built program written by the Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Kyoto University) in Visual Basic (VBA) on Excel (Microsoft Corporation)."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after single intravenous injection and constant rate infusion in dogs.
Igarashi, E; Kanazawa, H; Mochizuki, M; Nagata, Y; Nishimura, R; Sano, T; Sasaki, N, 2006
)
0.66
"While this study clarified the pharmacokinetic features of rapid IV fentanyl injection and CRI in dogs, the plasma concentration achieving analgesia was not and so further research is needed."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after single intravenous injection and constant rate infusion in dogs.
Igarashi, E; Kanazawa, H; Mochizuki, M; Nagata, Y; Nishimura, R; Sano, T; Sasaki, N, 2006
)
0.89
" As a result, the mechanism-based PK/PD model of fentanyl could be reduced to a biophase distribution model with fractional sigmoid E(max) pharmacodynamic model."( Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the respiratory-depressant effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats.
Dahan, A; Danhof, M; Kan, J; Olofsen, E; Suidgeest, E; Yassen, A, 2006
)
0.8
"The purposes of this study were to assess the dose proportionality of FEBT in healthy volunteers over the potential therapeutic dose range (100-800 microg) and characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of 4 doses (100, 200, 400, and 800 microg) of FEBT."( Pharmacokinetic properties of fentanyl effervescent buccal tablets: a phase I, open-label, crossover study of single-dose 100, 200, 400, and 800 microg in healthy adult volunteers.
Darwish, M; Jiang, JG; Kirby, M; Robertson, P; Tracewell, W, 2006
)
0.62
" In the third period, arterial and venous blood samples were obtained simultaneously from before administration of one FBT 400 microg through 4 hours after administration to evaluate the impact of arterial versus venous sampling on the pharmacokinetic profile."( Comparison of equivalent doses of fentanyl buccal tablets and arteriovenous differences in fentanyl pharmacokinetics.
Darwish, M; Hellriegel, E; Jiang, JG; Kirby, M; Robertson, P, 2006
)
0.61
" This study examined the duration of action of BUP at microORs and correlations with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic outcomes in 10 heroin-dependent volunteers."( Buprenorphine duration of action: mu-opioid receptor availability and pharmacokinetic and behavioral indices.
Bueller, J; Chang, Y; Greenwald, M; Johanson, CE; Kilbourn, M; Koeppe, R; Moody, DE; Zubieta, JK, 2007
)
0.34
"Together with our previous findings, it appears that microOR availability predicts changes in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures and that about 50%-60% BUP occupancy is required for adequate withdrawal symptom suppression (in the absence of other opioids) and HYD blockade."( Buprenorphine duration of action: mu-opioid receptor availability and pharmacokinetic and behavioral indices.
Bueller, J; Chang, Y; Greenwald, M; Johanson, CE; Kilbourn, M; Koeppe, R; Moody, DE; Zubieta, JK, 2007
)
0.34
" Steady state was reached within 5 days, consistent with the observed median half-life of approximately 22 hours following multiple doses."( Single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal tablet in healthy volunteers.
Darwish, M; Hellriegel, E; Jiang, JG; Kirby, M; Robertson, P, 2007
)
0.59
" These pharmacokinetic parameters provide information necessary for determination of suitable fentanyl loading and infusion doses in awake and isoflurane-anaesthetised horses."( Influence of general anaesthesia on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous fentanyl and its primary metabolite in horses.
Mama, KR; Stanley, SD; Steffey, EP; Thomasy, SM; Whitley, K, 2007
)
0.79
"The pharmacokinetic parameters of carfentanil and naltrexone were determined in the common eland (Taurotragus oryx)."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carfentanil and naltrexone in female common eland (Taurotragus oryx).
Carpenter, JW; Cole, A; Dresser, BL; Hunter, RP; Isaza, R; Koch, DE; Mutlow, A, 2006
)
0.33
" Plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different in male and female rats, but plasma concentrations of fentanyl in female rats were lower than those in male rats until 1 h after administration."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in male and female rats after intravenous administration.
Fujita, K; Kobayashi, H; Ohtsuka, H, 2007
)
0.86
"To examine the relationship between FBT dwell time and fentanyl pharmacokinetic parameters."( Effect of buccal dwell time on the pharmacokinetic profile of fentanyl buccal tablet.
Darwish, M; Jiang, JG; Kirby, M, 2007
)
0.83
"Assessments included buccal dwell time, defined as the duration of FBT presence in the oral cavity, and the following pharmacokinetic measures: maximum serum concentration (C(max)), time to C(max) (T(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; exposure) from 0 minutes to median T(max) adjusted for the dose (T(max')) (AUC(0 T(max')))."( Effect of buccal dwell time on the pharmacokinetic profile of fentanyl buccal tablet.
Darwish, M; Jiang, JG; Kirby, M, 2007
)
0.58
"The pharmacokinetic parameters of FBT did not appear to be related to its buccal dwell time."( Effect of buccal dwell time on the pharmacokinetic profile of fentanyl buccal tablet.
Darwish, M; Jiang, JG; Kirby, M, 2007
)
0.58
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using compartmental methods."( Effect of voriconazole and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous fentanyl.
Laine, K; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Olkkola, KT; Saari, TI, 2008
)
0.57
"This study describes a pharmacodynamic model during general anaesthesia in children relating the bispectral index (BIS) response to the anaesthetic dosing of propofol, fentanyl, and remifentanil."( Pharmacodynamic modelling of the bispectral index response to propofol-based anaesthesia during general surgery in children.
Ammon, C; Fechner, J; Ihmsen, H; Jeleazcov, C; Schmidt, J; Schüttler, J; Schwilden, H, 2008
)
0.54
" The pharmacodynamic parameters were estimated by non-linear regression analysis."( Pharmacodynamic modelling of the bispectral index response to propofol-based anaesthesia during general surgery in children.
Ammon, C; Fechner, J; Ihmsen, H; Jeleazcov, C; Schmidt, J; Schüttler, J; Schwilden, H, 2008
)
0.35
" This study was carried out to assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of a 12."( Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic study of a novel fentanyl-containing matrix transdermal patch system in Japanese patients with cancer pain.
Hanaoka, K; Hosokawa, T; Ishida, T; Kitajima, T; Mashimo, S; Miyazaki, T; Namiki, A; Nogami, S; Ogawa, S, 2008
)
0.59
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"Fentanyl, a short-acting synthetic opioid, has a pharmacokinetic profile suited to fast relief of brief episodic pain."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intranasal versus intravenous fentanyl in patients with pain after oral surgery.
Christrup, L; Foster, D; Popper, L; Upton, R, 2008
)
2.02
" Except for the longer duration of serum fentanyl concentrations above the therapeutic target associated with TM administration, no significant pharmacokinetic differences were found between IV and TM fentanyl."( Pharmacokinetics of buccal mucosal administration of fentanyl in a carboxymethylcellulose gel compared with IV administration in dogs.
Boothe, DM; Erb, HN; Krotscheck, U; Little, AA, 2008
)
0.86
" The fentanyl concentrations derived by both methods were compared by linear regression and pharmacokinetic analysis."( Comparison of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and radioimmunoassay for measurement of fentanyl and determination of pharmacokinetics in equine plasma.
Mama, KR; Stanley, SD; Thomasy, SM,
)
0.86
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated and compared."( Formulation selection and pharmacokinetic comparison of fentanyl buccal soluble film with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study.
Finn, AL; Gever, LN; Tagarro, I; Vasisht, N, 2009
)
0.6
"25 FBSF formulation provided the earliest time to reach Cmax (tmax), the highest Cmax value and the greatest AUC(infinity) value."( Formulation selection and pharmacokinetic comparison of fentanyl buccal soluble film with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study.
Finn, AL; Gever, LN; Tagarro, I; Vasisht, N, 2009
)
0.6
"25 FBSF formulation showed the most favourable pharmacokinetic profile of the three FBSF formulations."( Formulation selection and pharmacokinetic comparison of fentanyl buccal soluble film with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study.
Finn, AL; Gever, LN; Tagarro, I; Vasisht, N, 2009
)
0.6
" Pharmacokinetic data were analysed using a noncompartmental analysis approach."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after subcutaneous administration in volunteers.
Capper, SJ; Geue, JP; Loo, S; Ludbrook, GL; Macintyre, PE; Ong, J; Upton, RN, 2010
)
0.68
" The terminal half-life was 10."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after subcutaneous administration in volunteers.
Capper, SJ; Geue, JP; Loo, S; Ludbrook, GL; Macintyre, PE; Ong, J; Upton, RN, 2010
)
0.68
"Absorption of subcutaneous fentanyl was relatively rapid and similar to the rate of absorption previously reported for subcutaneous morphine; the terminal half-life for fentanyl was substantially longer (10 h) than that of morphine (2."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after subcutaneous administration in volunteers.
Capper, SJ; Geue, JP; Loo, S; Ludbrook, GL; Macintyre, PE; Ong, J; Upton, RN, 2010
)
0.98
" The venous pharmacokinetic profiles and tolerability of these formulations were assessed and compared with oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) lozenge."( Pharmacokinetic comparisons of three nasal fentanyl formulations; pectin, chitosan and chitosan-poloxamer 188.
Fisher, A; Knight, A; Smith, A; Watling, M, 2010
)
0.83
"Open-label, randomized, four-period, Latin-square crossover pharmacokinetic study."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal soluble film.
Finn, AL; Gever, LN; Tagarro, I; Vasisht, N, 2010
)
0.64
"Plasma concentrations after fentanyl dosing; pharmacokinetic parameters."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal soluble film.
Finn, AL; Gever, LN; Tagarro, I; Vasisht, N, 2010
)
0.94
" Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected at baseline and at 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after administration of study medication."( Pharmacokinetics, analgesic effect, and tolerability of a single preprocedural dose of intranasal fentanyl in patients undergoing drain removal after breast reduction or augmentation surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled stu
Fiddelers, AA; Kessels, AG; Marcus, MA; Neef, C; Theunissen, HM; van der Hulst, RR; van der Kuy, PH; Veldhorst-Janssen, NM, 2010
)
0.58
" Fentanyl concentrations were quantified via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic values were estimated."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered transdermally and intravenously in sheep.
Ahern, BJ; Rudy, JA; Schaer, TP; Soma, LR; Uboh, CE, 2010
)
1.59
"Median tmax values for FPNS ranged from 15 to 21 min post-dose and were dose-independent."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100 - 800 µg in healthy volunteers.
Fisher, A; Knight, A; Smith, A; Watling, M, 2010
)
0.62
"FPNS has a shorter tmax, higher Cmax and greater bioavailability than OTFC and is well tolerated."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100 - 800 µg in healthy volunteers.
Fisher, A; Knight, A; Smith, A; Watling, M, 2010
)
0.62
" This cross-study analysis aimed to evaluate the intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic differences of fentanyl administered via fentanyl buccal soluble film in healthy subjects."( Intra- and interindividual variabilities in the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal soluble film in healthy subjects: a cross-study analysis.
Davies, A; Finn, A; Tagarro, I, 2011
)
0.82
"Data were evaluated from 24 subjects in two pharmacokinetic studies of fentanyl administered via fentanyl buccal soluble film (Breakyl®/Onsolis™; BEMA® [BioErodible MucoAdhesive] technology)."( Intra- and interindividual variabilities in the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal soluble film in healthy subjects: a cross-study analysis.
Davies, A; Finn, A; Tagarro, I, 2011
)
0.84
"The analysis showed a minimal intraindividual variability and a relatively higher interindividual variability in pharmacokinetic parameters (i."( Intra- and interindividual variabilities in the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal soluble film in healthy subjects: a cross-study analysis.
Davies, A; Finn, A; Tagarro, I, 2011
)
0.6
" Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was used."( Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous fentanyl in Greyhounds.
KuKanich, B, 2011
)
0.65
" Estimates were made of the pharmacokinetic parameters during the preanhepatic, anhepatic, and neohepatic phases: central volume of distribution (V(1)) (l): 59."( The population pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in patients undergoing living-donor liver transplantation.
Choi, BM; Jin, SJ; Jung, JY; Lee, EK; Lee, SH; Noh, GJ; Noh, MH; Song, MH, 2011
)
0.65
" This analysis provides an overview of the pharmacokinetic profile of FBT based on pooled data from nine pharmacokinetic studies."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal tablet: a pooled analysis and review.
Darwish, M; Xie, F, 2012
)
0.7
" To facilitate pharmacokinetic studies of fentanyl and its metabolites in neonates and other children, we developed and validated an LC-MS/MS method based on minimally invasive, low blood volume sampling."( A low blood volume LC-MS/MS assay for the quantification of fentanyl and its major metabolites norfentanyl and despropionyl fentanyl in children.
Christians, U; Clavijo, CF; Cromie, M; Galinkin, JL; Hoffman, KL; Schniedewind, B; Thomas, JJ, 2011
)
0.88
" Moreover, the present method was successfully applied to study pharmacokinetic parameters of FEN after intraperitoneal administration to male Wistar rat."( HPLC-UV method development for fentanyl determination in rat plasma and its application to elucidate pharmacokinetic behavior after i.p. administration to rats.
Almousa, AA; Hanajiri, RK; Ikeda, R; Kuroda, N; Nakashima, K; Wada, M, 2011
)
0.66
"Available propofol pharmacokinetic protocols for target-controlled infusion (TCI) were obtained from healthy individuals."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.
Bieda, K; Bienert, A; Grześkowiak, E; Hartmann-Sobczyńska, R; Kaliszan, R; Malatyńska, M; Marcinkowska, A; Sobczyński, P; Wiczling, P, 2012
)
0.38
" The principal study objective was to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of a new sublingual fentanyl wafer and to establish its absolute bioavailability."( A phase I pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study of a sublingual fentanyl wafer in healthy volunteers.
Lim, CB; Liu, Y; Paech, MJ; Schug, SA; Sunderland, VB, 2012
)
0.83
" The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by model-independent pharmacokinetic analyses of the plasma fentanyl concentration-time profiles."( A phase I pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study of a sublingual fentanyl wafer in healthy volunteers.
Lim, CB; Liu, Y; Paech, MJ; Schug, SA; Sunderland, VB, 2012
)
0.83
" The PKs were primarily characterized by a rapid initial increase in plasma fentanyl concentrations and a long terminal half-life of 74."( Population pharmacokinetics of transdermal fentanyl solution following a single dose administered prior to soft tissue and orthopedic surgery in dogs.
Clark, TP; Freise, KJ; Linton, DD; Newbound, GC; Tudan, C, 2012
)
0.87
" Steady state simulations revealed that an extension from the current SmPC scenario to 6 pain episodes per day would yield similar Cmax values."( Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of intranasal fentanyl spray as a means to enrich pharmacokinetic information for patients with cancer breakthrough pain.
Facius, A; Kaessner, N; Lahu, G; Nave, R; Roepcke, S, 2012
)
0.63
" The aim of this study was to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of INFS single dose delivery system (SDS) in relation to the currently marketed MDS device."( Single-dose and multi-dose delivery systems for intranasal fentanyl spray are bioequivalent as demonstrated in a replicate pharmacokinetic study.
Connolly, SM; Lahu, G; Nave, R; Popper, L; Schmitt, H, 2012
)
0.62
" Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax)."( Single-dose and multi-dose delivery systems for intranasal fentanyl spray are bioequivalent as demonstrated in a replicate pharmacokinetic study.
Connolly, SM; Lahu, G; Nave, R; Popper, L; Schmitt, H, 2012
)
0.62
" The mean fentanyl Cmax and AUC0-∞ values for SDS and MDS were 948 pg/ml, 949 pg/ml and 4,439 pg×h/ml, 4,489 pg×h/ml."( Single-dose and multi-dose delivery systems for intranasal fentanyl spray are bioequivalent as demonstrated in a replicate pharmacokinetic study.
Connolly, SM; Lahu, G; Nave, R; Popper, L; Schmitt, H, 2012
)
1.02
" Serial blood sampling was performed over an 8-hour period after drug administration to determine the pharmacokinetic profile, and serial pupillometry was performed as a measure of pharmacodynamic effect."( Inhaled fentanyl aerosol in healthy volunteers: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Cassella, JV; Gan, TJ; Habib, AS; Ho, KY; Ikeda, K; Macleod, DB; Spyker, DA, 2012
)
0.81
"In the crossover stage the pharmacokinetic profiles of the inhaled and IV fentanyl showed similar peak arterial concentrations and areas under the curve."( Inhaled fentanyl aerosol in healthy volunteers: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Cassella, JV; Gan, TJ; Habib, AS; Ho, KY; Ikeda, K; Macleod, DB; Spyker, DA, 2012
)
1.04
"This study has demonstrated that the pharmacokinetic profile of single doses of inhaled fentanyl is comparable to IV administration."( Inhaled fentanyl aerosol in healthy volunteers: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Cassella, JV; Gan, TJ; Habib, AS; Ho, KY; Ikeda, K; Macleod, DB; Spyker, DA, 2012
)
1.04
" The purposes of this analysis were to identify and review published data describing the pharmacokinetic properties of rapid-onset fentanyl formulations and to evaluate these properties in view of the temporal dynamic characteristics of BTP in order to help guide medical practice."( A review of the pharmacokinetic profile of transmucosal fentanyl formulations.
Amores, X; Darwish, M; Moore, N; Schneid, H, 2012
)
0.83
"Given the substantial variability of BTP episodes experienced by patients, these pharmacokinetic differences may provide useful information for a physician who is selecting a rapid-onset opioid medication for a patient."( A review of the pharmacokinetic profile of transmucosal fentanyl formulations.
Amores, X; Darwish, M; Moore, N; Schneid, H, 2012
)
0.63
" Measures of fentanyl absorption (mean or median) were similar between Control and Rhinitis conditions: Cmax 453."( Impact of allergic rhinitis and its treatment on the pharmacokinetics of nasally administered fentanyl.
Fisher, AN; Knight, A; Perelman, M; Smith, A, 2013
)
0.98
" Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured for 36 hours after each dose for the calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl sublingual spray and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study.
Chavan, A; Dillaha, L; Goskonda, V; Parikh, N, 2013
)
1.11
"Mean Cmax values of fentanyl were higher with FSS versus OTFC (0."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl sublingual spray and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study.
Chavan, A; Dillaha, L; Goskonda, V; Parikh, N, 2013
)
1
" The pharmacokinetic profile of the sublingual spray closely matches the duration of onset to pain intensity in a breakthrough cancer pain episode."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl sublingual spray and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study.
Chavan, A; Dillaha, L; Goskonda, V; Parikh, N, 2013
)
0.67
"As pharmacokinetic (PK) samples from cancer patients with BTP are hard to obtain, PK of 400 μg INFS was investigated in healthy volunteers."( An innovative phase I population pharmacokinetic approach to investigate the pharmacokinetics of an intranasal fentanyl spray in healthy subjects.
Baumann, S; Facius, A; Hartmann, L; Nave, R; Plock, N, 2013
)
0.6
"Key pharmacokinetic variables and principles (protein binding, clearance, distribution) as related to fentanyl pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic behavior in adults (tricompartmental model) and to neonatal physiologic data (organ weights and blood flows, body composition, renal and hepatic function, etc."( A predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of fentanyl for analgesia/sedation in neonates based on a semi-physiologic approach.
Calvo, R; Encinas, E; Lukas, JC; Rodriguez, M; Suarez, E; Vozmediano, V, 2013
)
0.85
" Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling can support this process by enabling extrapolations across doses, and exposure routes, thereby addressing gaps in the available toxicity data."( Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for Fentanyl in support of the development of Provisional Advisory Levels.
Adeshina, F; Shankaran, H; Teeguarden, JG, 2013
)
0.65
" This study assessed the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of FPNS administered as 4 sprays of 100 μg as an alternate titration strategy."( A pharmacokinetic assessment of an alternate titration strategy for fentanyl pectin nasal spray.
Knight, A; Perelman, M, 2013
)
0.63
" We used a pharmacokinetic model developed from published data to simulate the effect of sample patient-controlled epidural labor analgesic regimens on plasma fentanyl concentrations in the absence and presence of ritonavir-induced cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition."( Effect of ritonavir-induced cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition on plasma fentanyl concentrations during patient-controlled epidural labor analgesia: a pharmacokinetic simulation.
Avram, MJ; Cambic, CR; Gupta, DK; Wong, CA, 2014
)
0.83
" Systemic fentanyl disposition was described using a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model."( Effect of ritonavir-induced cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition on plasma fentanyl concentrations during patient-controlled epidural labor analgesia: a pharmacokinetic simulation.
Avram, MJ; Cambic, CR; Gupta, DK; Wong, CA, 2014
)
1.04
"1 mg fentanyl was found to represent unique pharmacokinetic parameters by Shapiro-Wilk test, only 15 of the 16 study patients were investigated."( Pharmacokinetics of a new fentanyl tape with a novel delivery system of transdermal matrix patches in patients with cancer pain.
Fujii, M; Fujiwara, K; Kobayashi, K; Saito, S; Saito, T; Shimada, K, 2014
)
1.22
" The terminal half-life of fentanyl (2."( Comparative pharmacokinetics of intravenous fentanyl and buprenorphine in healthy greyhound dogs.
Allen, P; KuKanich, B, 2014
)
0.96
" The pharmacodynamic parameters were highly variable."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in children undergoing different types of surgeries.
Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, A; Bienert, A; Grześkowiak, E; Grześkowiak, M; Kaliszan, R; Kokot, ZJ; Matysiak, J; Owczarek, M; Rosada-Kurasińska, J; Wiczling, P, 2014
)
0.4
" The elimination half-life was slightly prolonged (49."( Effects of age on the pharmacokinetics and selected pharmacodynamics of intravenously administered fentanyl in foals.
Casbeer, HC; Knych, HK; Mitchell, MM; Steffey, EP, 2015
)
0.63
" These dosage forms offer overlapping yet distinct pharmacokinetic advantages to allow more choices for physicians and patients in the management of breakthrough cancer pain."( Clinical and pharmacokinetic considerations of novel formulations of fentanyl for breakthrough cancer pain.
Chen, C; Gupta, A, 2014
)
0.64
" Pharmacokinetic parameters reported for non-pregnant sheep and nominal transdermal dose rate were utilized for a priori calculation to achieve analgesic fentanyl concentration (0."( Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics in Pregnant Sheep after Intravenous and Transdermal Administration to the Ewe.
Acharya, G; Erkinaro, T; Haapala, L; Haapsamo, M; Hautajärvi, H; Heikkinen, AT; Heikkinen, EM; Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Laaksonen, S; Räsänen, J; Voipio, HM, 2015
)
2.06
"To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of a modified fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS)."( Pharmacokinetic characteristics of fentanyl iontophoretic trandermal system over a range of applied current.
Joshi, N; Li, J; Phipps, JB; Regal, KA; Sinatra, RS, 2015
)
0.93
" The median tmax ranged from 23."( Pharmacokinetic characteristics of fentanyl iontophoretic trandermal system over a range of applied current.
Joshi, N; Li, J; Phipps, JB; Regal, KA; Sinatra, RS, 2015
)
0.69
" Pharmacokinetic parameters-peak concentration (C(max)), time to C(max) (t(max)), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-were derived using noncompartmental method."( Effect of dosing interval on pharmacokinetics of fentanyl pectin nasal spray from a crossover study.
Bujanover, S; Chen, C; Gupta, A,
)
0.39
" Median tmax was 10-15 minutes across five regimens."( Effect of dosing interval on pharmacokinetics of fentanyl pectin nasal spray from a crossover study.
Bujanover, S; Chen, C; Gupta, A,
)
0.39
" However there is great interpatient variation in the dose required to relieve pain and little knowledge about the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of fentanyl and pain control."( Saliva versus Plasma for Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies of Fentanyl in Patients with Cancer.
Bista, SR; Good, P; Hardy, J; Haywood, A; Lobb, M; Norris, R; Tapuni, A, 2015
)
0.84
" A population pharmacokinetic model was developed and evaluated using non-linear mixed-effects modelling."( Treatment with subcutaneous and transdermal fentanyl: results from a population pharmacokinetic study in cancer patients.
Abrantes, JA; de Bruijn, P; Falcão, A; Jönsson, S; Kuip, EJ; Mathijssen, RH; Oosten, AW; van der Rijt, CC, 2016
)
0.7
" Pharmacokinetic model-based dosing schemes can quantitatively describe the time course of drug effects and achieve optimal drug therapy."( Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of a Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Dosing Scheme Versus a Conventional Fentanyl Dosing Regimen For Patient-Controlled Analgesia Immediately Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Clinical Tria
Chin, JH; Hwang, JH; Jin, SJ; Kim, YK; Kwon, YJ; Lim, HS; Park, SU; Yi, JM, 2016
)
0.65
"One barrier contributing to the lack of pharmacokinetic (PK) data in paediatric populations is the need for serial sampling."( Pragmatic pharmacology: population pharmacokinetic analysis of fentanyl using remnant samples from children after cardiac surgery.
Beck, C; Caprioli, RM; Choi, L; Crum, K; Hachey, B; Kannankeril, PJ; Marshall, MD; Owen, J; Smith, AH; Van Driest, SL; Woodworth, A, 2016
)
0.67
" The pharmacokinetic properties of 2 transdermal fentanyl delivery methods, a solution (2."( Pharmacokinetics of 2 Formulations of Transdermal Fentanyl in Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca fascicularis).
Bailey, EJ; Carlson, AM; Fetterer, DP; Kelly, R; Rico, PJ, 2016
)
0.94
" The mean plasma terminal half-life was 33."( PHARMACOKINETIC EVALUATION OF A LONG-ACTING FENTANYL SOLUTION AFTER TRANSDERMAL ADMINISTRATION IN HELMETED GUINEAFOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS).
Cole, G; D'Agostino, J; Knych, H; Waugh, L, 2016
)
0.7
"A randomized, single-dose, crossover, open-label study was used to investigate the effect of mEHT on the pharmacokinetic properties of fentanyl in 12 healthy volunteers."( Effect of Modulated Electrohyperthermia on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Transmucosal Fentanyl Citrate in Healthy Volunteers.
Kim, MG; Lee, SY, 2016
)
0.86
" The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic parameters of an FDA-approved transdermal fentanyl solution (TFS) that has yet to be tested in sheep."( Pharmacokinetics of a Transdermal Fentanyl Solution in Suffolk Sheep (
Dyson, MC; Jen, KY; Lester, PA; Nemzek, JA, 2017
)
0.95
"The assay has been successfully applied to serum samples obtained from healthy subjects of a fentanyl transdermal pharmacokinetic study."( LC-MS determination of fentanyl in human serum and application to a fentanyl transdermal delivery pharmacokinetic study.
Abdallah, IA; Hammell, DC; Hassan, HE; Shin, SH; Stinchcomb, AL; Yu, M, 2017
)
0.99
" Pharmacokinetic and safety-related pharmacodynamic assessments were performed through 24 h post-first dose."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of fentanyl sublingual spray and fentanyl citrate intravenous: a multiple ascending dose study in opioid-naïve healthy volunteers.
Koch, C; Nalamachu, S; Oh, DA; Parikh, N; Rauck, RL; Singla, N; Vetticaden, S; Wilson, D; Yu, J, 2017
)
0.74
" However, the pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and fentanyl is unclear."( Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Tacrolimus and Fentanyl in Patients Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Fuchida, SI; Hatsuse, M; Kado, Y; Kitazawa, F; Kokufu, T; Murakami, S; Nakayama, Y; Okano, A; Shimazaki, C; Takara, K; Ueda, K, 2017
)
0.94
"The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of many drugs are altered as a consequence of the pathophysiological changes associated with critical illness."( Altered Pharmacokinetics in Prolonged Infusions of Sedatives and Analgesics Among Adult Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.
Joynt, GM; Lee, A; Ling, L; Tse, AHW, 2018
)
0.48
" Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using Monolix software (Lixsoft, France) with a two-compartment population model best-representing fentanyl profiles."( Identification of Cytochrome P450 Polymorphisms in Burn Patients and Impact on Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics: A Pilot Study.
Grimsrud, KN; Ivanova, X; Palmieri, TL; Sherwin, CM; Tran, NK, 2019
)
0.94
" A significant correlation was seen between weight at study inclusion and half-life (Spearman's r = -0."( Individual variations in fentanyl pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in preterm infants.
Berg, AC; Fellman, V; Hallberg, B; Kindblom, JM; Norman, E; Rane, A; Schubert, U, 2019
)
0.82
" Pharmacokinetic variables were derived from plasma concentration-time curves best fitted to a two-compartment model."( Prolonged therapy with the anticonvulsant carbamazepine leads to increased plasma clearance of fentanyl.
Akeju, O; Eskandar, E; Greenblatt, DJ; Hossain, MA; Ma, Z; Martyn, JAJ; Mirzakhani, H; Nozari, A; Wang, Q, 2019
)
0.73
"In this study we show the feasibility and utility of using electronic record data and remnant blood samples to successfully construct population pharmacokinetic models for a heterogeneous cohort of critically ill children."( Factors Contributing to Fentanyl Pharmacokinetic Variability Among Diagnostically Diverse Critically Ill Children.
Au, AK; Clark, RSB; Conley, YP; Empey, PE; Hagos, FT; Horvat, CM; Kochanek, PM; Li, L; Poloyac, SM, 2019
)
0.82
"Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are an important type of systems model used commonly in drug development before commencement of first-in-human studies."( Automated proper lumping for simplification of linear physiologically based pharmacokinetic systems.
Duffull, SB; Pan, S, 2019
)
0.51
" Due to very limited pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, fentanyl dosing is mostly based on bodyweight."( Rapidly maturing fentanyl clearance in preterm neonates.
Allegaert, K; Andriessen, P; Flint, RB; Knibbe, CAJ; Koch, BCP; Liem, KD; Simons, SHP; Völler, S; Zimmermann, LJI, 2019
)
1.09
"3 was used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to perform simulations."( Rapidly maturing fentanyl clearance in preterm neonates.
Allegaert, K; Andriessen, P; Flint, RB; Knibbe, CAJ; Koch, BCP; Liem, KD; Simons, SHP; Völler, S; Zimmermann, LJI, 2019
)
0.85
"To compare fentanyl infusion pharmacokinetic variables in obese children and nonobese children."( Prediction and Comparison of Fentanyl Infusion Pharmacokinetics in Obese and Nonobese Children.
Henry, ED; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Skrepnek, GH; Woo, S, 2019
)
1.19
"A pharmacokinetic simulation study."( Prediction and Comparison of Fentanyl Infusion Pharmacokinetics in Obese and Nonobese Children.
Henry, ED; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Skrepnek, GH; Woo, S, 2019
)
0.81
"We used a semi-physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to generate fentanyl pharmacokinetic variables."( Prediction and Comparison of Fentanyl Infusion Pharmacokinetics in Obese and Nonobese Children.
Henry, ED; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Skrepnek, GH; Woo, S, 2019
)
1.04
"Simulations of pharmacokinetic variables were based on historical inpatient demographic data in less than 18-year-olds."( Prediction and Comparison of Fentanyl Infusion Pharmacokinetics in Obese and Nonobese Children.
Henry, ED; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Skrepnek, GH; Woo, S, 2019
)
0.81
" An additional simulation was conducted for 15-year-old obese children and nonobese children using a fixed dose of 50 µg/hr and it provided similar pharmacokinetic profiles."( Prediction and Comparison of Fentanyl Infusion Pharmacokinetics in Obese and Nonobese Children.
Henry, ED; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Skrepnek, GH; Woo, S, 2019
)
0.81
" While pharmacokinetic studies typically measure drug concentrations from the peripheral vein such as the arm vein, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models generally output simulated concentrations from the central venous compartment that physiologically represents the right atrium, a merge of the superior and inferior vena cava."( Sampling Site Has a Critical Impact on Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.
Huang, W; Isoherranen, N, 2020
)
0.56
" The simultaneous quantification of morphine, fentanyl and its metabolites via this simple and time- and cost-efficient method could be successfully applied to samples taken for pharmacokinetic evaluation (antemortem and postmortem) after a single dose of morphine or co-administration of morphine with other drugs (e."( Determination of Morphine, Fentanyl and Their Metabolites in Small Sample Volumes Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Gleba, J; Kim, J, 2020
)
1.11
"Postmarketing population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies can be useful to capture patient characteristics affecting PK or PD in real-world settings."( Development of a System for Postmarketing Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies Using Real-World Data From Electronic Health Records.
Abou-Khalil, BW; Beck, C; Bejan, CA; Birdwell, KA; Choi, L; Denny, JC; James, NT; McNeer, E; Niu, X; Roden, DM; Stein, CM; Van Driest, SL; Weeks, HL; Williams, ML, 2020
)
0.56
" Measured concentrations were compared with predicted concentrations using population pharmacokinetic parameters."( Safe prognostication following cardiac arrest: The role of the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in patients treated with targeted temperature management.
Allen, M; Baldwin, F; Boyd, O; Gray, R; Patel, B; Scutt, G; Waxman, D, 2020
)
0.78
" Univariate analysis identified a significant relationship between estimated fentanyl half-life and serum lactate concentrations (r = 0."( Safe prognostication following cardiac arrest: The role of the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in patients treated with targeted temperature management.
Allen, M; Baldwin, F; Boyd, O; Gray, R; Patel, B; Scutt, G; Waxman, D, 2020
)
1.01
"In the pharmacokinetic study, subjects received an intravenous bolus of fentanyl 100 μg during operation, and arterial blood was sampled at pre-set intervals."( An allometric pharmacokinetic model and minimum effective analgesic concentration of fentanyl in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Bae, J; Choi, BM; Kwon, M; Lee, EK; Lee, YH; Noh, GJ, 2020
)
1.01
"In the population pharmacokinetic study (n=95), the plasma concentration of fentanyl over time was well-described by the three-compartment mammillary model using an allometric expression."( An allometric pharmacokinetic model and minimum effective analgesic concentration of fentanyl in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Bae, J; Choi, BM; Kwon, M; Lee, EK; Lee, YH; Noh, GJ, 2020
)
1.01
" Subsequently, the target mapping outcomes were applied to build physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for acetaminophen and fentanyl to explore the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between this pair of drugs."( Pain Chemogenomics Knowledgebase (Pain-CKB) for Systems Pharmacology Target Mapping and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Investigation of Opioid Drug-Drug Interactions.
Bertz, R; Chen, M; Feng, Z; Liang, T; Shen, M; Wang, S; Xie, XQ; Xue, Y, 2020
)
0.76
" Fentanyl plasma concentrations were measured with LC-MS/MS for pharmacokinetic analysis."( The pharmacokinetics of a fentanyl matrix patch applied at three different anatomical locations in horses.
Barletta, M; Brainard, B; Knych, H; Quandt, J; Reed, R; Ruch, M; Sakai, D; Skrzypczak, H; Smyth, C, 2022
)
1.93
" standard pharmacokinetic pattern for guiding intraoperative fentanyl administration."( Comparative study of analgesia nociception index (ANI) vs. standard pharmacokinetic pattern for guiding intraoperative fentanyl administration among mastectomy patients.
Nonlhaopol, D; Promkhote, P; Sathitkarnmanee, T; Sukhong, P; Thananun, M; Tribuddharat, S, 2021
)
1.07
"Fentanyl pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are limited in mechanically ventilated children."( Analysis of fentanyl pharmacokinetics, and its sedative effects and tolerance in critically ill children.
Heltsley, R; Henry, E; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Woo, S, 2021
)
2.44
"Subcutaneous fentanyl injection is commonly prescribed to manage acute pain in older patients; however, there is a gap in the literature describing the pharmacokinetic parameters for this route of administration in this population."( Population pharmacokinetic model of subcutaneous fentanyl in older acute care patients.
Al-Qurain, AA; Mackenzie, L; Phillips, C; Roberts, MS; Russell, PT; Tadros, R; Upton, R; Wiese, MD; Williams, DB, 2021
)
1.24
" A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling."( Population pharmacokinetic model of subcutaneous fentanyl in older acute care patients.
Al-Qurain, AA; Mackenzie, L; Phillips, C; Roberts, MS; Russell, PT; Tadros, R; Upton, R; Wiese, MD; Williams, DB, 2021
)
0.88
"This is the first report of subcutaneous fentanyl population pharmacokinetic model to evaluate fentanyl pharmacokinetic in older patients."( Population pharmacokinetic model of subcutaneous fentanyl in older acute care patients.
Al-Qurain, AA; Mackenzie, L; Phillips, C; Roberts, MS; Russell, PT; Tadros, R; Upton, R; Wiese, MD; Williams, DB, 2021
)
1.14
" To address this knowledge gap, we developed a maternal-fetal physiologically based pharmacokinetic (mf-PBPK) model for fentanyl to evaluate the feasibility to predict the maternal and fetal plasma concentration-time profiles of fentanyl after various dosing regimens."( Predicting Maternal-Fetal Disposition of Fentanyl Following Intravenous and Epidural Administration Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.
Isoherranen, N; Shen, DD; Shum, S, 2021
)
1.1
" Blood specimens were withdrawn over an 8-h time period, along with measurements of pharmacodynamic endpoints."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cyclopropylfentanyl in male rats.
Baumann, MH; Bergh, MS; Bogen, IL; Garibay, N, 2021
)
0.87
" Given the limited pharmacokinetic information across the entire neonatal age range, we characterized the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl across preterm and term neonates to individualize dosing."( Pre- and Postnatal Maturation are Important for Fentanyl Exposure in Preterm and Term Newborns: A Pooled Population Pharmacokinetic Study.
Allegaert, K; Fellman, V; Flint, RB; Knibbe, CAJ; Simons, SHP; Völler, S; Wu, Y, 2022
)
1.18
" All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analysis, but one patient was excluded from the pharmacokinetic analysis because blood was sampled on the day after blood transfusion."( An Open-Label Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Once-a-Day Fentanyl Citrate Patch in Japanese Pediatric and Adolescent Patients with Cancer Pain.
Hashimoto, F; Hiyama, E; Okawa, K; Otaka, K; Terahara, T; Yamaguchi, S, 2021
)
0.85
" In this study, three bioequivalent, matrix-type, fentanyl transdermal delivery systems (TDS) were evaluated in vitro using an in vitro permeation test (IVPT) and dermatomed human skin, and in vivo in human pharmacokinetic (PK) studies under harmonized study designs to evaluate IVIVC."( Evaluation of in vitro/in vivo correlations for three fentanyl transdermal delivery systems using in vitro skin permeation testing and human pharmacokinetic studies under the influence of transient heat application.
Ghosh, P; Hammell, DC; Hassan, HE; Raney, SG; Shin, SH; Stinchcomb, AL; Yu, M, 2022
)
1.22
" Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are difficult to replicate in children due to the burden of additional blood taken solely for research purposes."( Effect of CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 Genetic Variants on Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics in a Pediatric Population.
Breeyear, JH; Choi, L; Edwards, TL; Kannankeril, PJ; Van Driest, SL; Williams, ML, 2022
)
0.98
" However, pharmacokinetic studies in children with obesity are challenging to conduct, so there is limited information to guide fentanyl and methadone dosing in these children."( Use of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to inform dosing of the opioid analgesics fentanyl and methadone in children with obesity.
Al-Uzri, A; Atz, AM; Carreño, FO; Delmore, P; Edginton, AN; Ford, JL; Gerhart, JG; Gonzalez, D; Muller, WJ; Perrin, EM; Watt, KM, 2022
)
1.14
"In order to find a correlation between Fentanyl action on pain and inter-individual variability in different cancer patients, the pharmacokinetic characterization of the drug becomes essential."( Fentanyl pharmacokinetics in blood of cancer patients by Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry.
Andrisano, V; Davani, L; De Simone, A; Maltoni, M; Montanari, S; Ricci, M; Terenzi, C, 2022
)
2.43
" A pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM."( Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
Cho, JY; Choi, BM; Jang, YE; Ji, SH; Kang, P; Kim, EH; Kim, HS; Kim, JT; Lee, JH; Noh, GJ, 2023
)
0.91
" The objective of this study was to develop  a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict fentanyl concentrations in different newborn tissues due to intrauterine exposure."( Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl in the Brain Extracellular Fluid, Saliva, Urine, and Plasma of Newborns from Transplacental Exposure from Parturient Mothers Dosed with Epidural Fentanyl Utilizing PBPK Modeling.
Alsmadi, MM, 2023
)
1.4
"To explore the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of naloxone administered intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) to reverse fentanyl sedation in working dogs."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intranasal and intramuscular administration of naloxone in working dogs administered fentanyl.
Barr, CA; Drobatz, KJ; Gianotti, G; Haughan, J; McGuire, A; Otto, CM; Pennington, M; Robinson, M; Stefanovski, D; Varner, K,
)
0.54
" Pharmacokinetic parameters and sedation scores were compared between IM and IN naloxone groups."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intranasal and intramuscular administration of naloxone in working dogs administered fentanyl.
Barr, CA; Drobatz, KJ; Gianotti, G; Haughan, J; McGuire, A; Otto, CM; Pennington, M; Robinson, M; Stefanovski, D; Varner, K,
)
0.34

Compound-Compound Interactions

Spinal anesthesia combined with fentanyl sometimes induces sedation. In combination with fentanyl, bupivacaine and ropvacaine exhibit comparable efficacy and safety.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Substitution of thiopentone by midazolam in combination with fentanyl abolished the adverse haemodynamic response and modified the increase in plasma catecholamine concentrations."( Catecholamine response to laryngoscopy and intubation. The influence of three different drug combinations commonly used for induction of anaesthesia.
Bjerre-Jepsen, K; Chraemmer-Jørgensen, B; Hertel, S; Høilund-Carlsen, PF; Strøm, J, 1992
)
0.52
" This study was designed to investigate whether higher doses of fentanyl combined with diazepam would influence the early-stage of postoperative conditions."( Effects of high-dose fentanyl combined with diazepam on patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Chang, CL; Tseng, CC; Yeh, FC, 1991
)
0.84
"15 mg/kg) combined with Piritramid (0."( [Midazolam in combination with piritramid versus Thalamonal in premedication in ambulatory ENT interventions in childhood].
Bein, T; Heyde, G; Tremel, H, 1988
)
0.27
"One-hundred and eighty patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy were anaesthetized in random order with isoflurane, enflurane or fentanyl in combination with nitrous oxide and oxygen."( Nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia with isoflurane, enflurane or fentanyl in combination with nitrous oxide and oxygen.
Erkola, O; Hovorka, J; Korttila, K, 1988
)
0.71
" The purpose of this study was to compare recovery of patients sedated with either midazolam or diazepam alone or in combination with fentanyl using the digit symbol substitution test (DSST) and Trieger test."( Recovery following sedation with midazolam or diazepam alone or in combination with fentanyl for outpatient surgery.
Anderson, JA; Ochs, MW; Tucker, MR; White, RP,
)
0.56
" This study compares the amnesia produced in patients sedated with midazolam or diazepam or in combination with fentanyl during oral surgery."( A comparison of amnesia in outpatients sedated with midazolam or diazepam alone or in combination with fentanyl during oral surgery.
Ochs, MW; Tucker, MR; White, RP, 1986
)
0.7
"Two recent antifungal agents, miconazole and ketoconazole, were combined with three tissue conditioners and tested in vitro for their effects on the growth of Candida albicans."( The effectiveness, in vitro, of miconazole and ketoconazole combined with tissue conditioners in inhibiting the growth of Candida albicans.
Quinn, DM, 1985
)
0.27
" These results suggest that nitrous oxide or its combination with fentanyl has a depressant action on the transmission of monosynaptic reflexes in the spinal cord, but nitrous oxide might exert less effect on the spinal interneurones which mediate polysynaptic reflexes."( Effect of nitrous oxide alone or its combination with fentanyl on spinal reflexes in cats.
Goto, K; Maruyama, H; Sugai, N, 1982
)
0.75
" Several anaesthetic agents, often used in combination with fentanyl, were tested with respect to their influence on fentanyl metabolism."( [Biotransformation of fentanyl. II. Acute drug interactions in rats and men (author's transl)].
Daub, D; Heinrich, C; Hunger, L; Lehmann, KA; Weski, C, 1982
)
0.82
" Therefore the application of etomidate as a continuous infusion in combination with fentanyl and nitrous oxide 66% seems to be an effective technique of intravenous anaesthesia."( [The influence on the cardiovascular system of etomidate infusion anaesthesia combined with fentanyl/nitrous oxide (author's transl)].
Hoffmann, P; Schockenhoff, B, 1981
)
0.71
"Anaesthesia in guinea pigs with a new highly potent and short-acting analgesic, carfentanyl (R 33799), combined with the hypnotic, etomidat (R 26490), is reported."( A new highly potent and short-acting analgesic, carfentanyl (R 33799), in combination with the hypnotic agent, etomidat (R 26490), as a method of anaesthesia in guinea pigs.
Blümel, G; Erhardt, W; Fritsch, R; Neumann, G; Oberhuber, B, 1980
)
0.74
" The use of TTS fentanyl in combination with initial dose titration using PCA resulted in rapid and statistically significant pain relief in both studies."( Transdermal fentanyl in combination with initial intravenous dose titration by patient-controlled analgesia.
Lehmann, KA; Zech, DF, 1995
)
1.02
"Concerning the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions, the following is recommended: Use smaller doses of alfentanil when the latter is combined with propofol, because of a higher risk of ventilatory depression."( [Diprivan: drug interactions].
Steib, A, 1994
)
0.29
"Thoracic epidural analgesia combined with chronic beta-adrenergic blocker medication may cause cardiac depression."( The influence of thoracic epidural analgesia alone and in combination with general anesthesia on cardiovascular function and myocardial metabolism in patients receiving beta-adrenergic blockers.
Berg, EM; Bjella, L; Christensen, O; Gisvold, SE; Levang, OW; Stenseth, R, 1993
)
0.29
" The present study was designed to examine the effects of low, moderate, and high doses of propofol, given with either fentanyl or halothane, on the rate of CSF formation and resistance to reabsorption of CSF."( Propofol combined with halothane or with fentanyl/halothane does not alter the rate of CSF formation or resistance to reabsorption of CSF in rabbits.
Artru, AA, 1993
)
0.76
"03 mg/kg) combined with fentanyl (0."( Cardiac electrophysiologic effects of midazolam combined with fentanyl.
Kovoor, P; Lau, W; Ross, DL, 1993
)
0.83
"When establishing a rabbit model for cardiovascular research in our laboratory we have used midazolam in combination with fentanyl/fluanisone (MFF) and nitrous oxide as anaesthesia."( Midazolam in combination with fentanyl/fluanisone and nitrous oxide as anaesthesia in rabbits--cardiovascular parameters.
Fosse, RT; Hessevik, I; Hexeberg, E; Hexeberg, S, 1995
)
0.79
" In this study, the effects of propofol in healthy and in septic sheep, and in combination with fentanyl, were analyzed and compared with nonanesthetized septic sheep."( The effects of propofol on hemodynamics and renal blood flow in healthy and in septic sheep, and combined with fentanyl in septic sheep.
Armstrong, C; Booke, M; Conroy, B; Hinder, F; Traber, DL; Traber, LD, 1996
)
0.72
"Stress hormone response was investigated during midazolam/fentanyl/oxygen/air anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia in six patients undergoing abdominal total hysterectomy (group MF)."( [Stress hormone response during midazolam/fentanyl anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia for abdominal total hysterectomy].
Honda, N; Kitano, T; Miyakawa, H; Mizutani, A; Taniguchi, K; Yoshitake, S, 1996
)
0.8
" Epidural clonidine infused at 20 microg/h improves analgesia during coughing when combined with epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery but is associated with hemodynamic changes and increased vasopressor requirement."( Postoperative epidural infusion: a randomized, double-blind, dose-finding trial of clonidine in combination with bupivacaine and fentanyl.
Evans, SF; Lim, W; Orlikowski, CE; Paech, MJ; Pavy, TJ, 1997
)
0.71
" Volatile anesthetics are commonly combined with opioids."( Drug interactions: volatile anesthetics and opioids.
Gan, TJ; Ginsberg, B; Glass, PS; Howell, S, 1997
)
0.3
" The neurotoxic effect of midazolam, alone or combined with fentanyl, injected intrathecally repeatedly on 15 occasions over a period of 1 month, was studied in the same model."( An investigation of the possible neurotoxic effects of intrathecal midazolam combined with fentanyl in the rat.
Bahar, M; Chanimov, M; Cohen, ML; Grinshpoon, Y; Herbert, M; Kopolovic, U; Nass, D, 1998
)
0.76
"Our aim in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was to compare the analgesic effectiveness and side effects of epidural infusions with ropivacaine 2 mg/mL alone (Group R; n = 60) and in combination with fentanyl 1 microg/mL (R1F; n = 59), 2 microg/mL (R2F; n = 62), and 4 microg/mL (R4F; n = 63) for up to 72 h after major abdominal surgery."( A comparison of epidural ropivacaine infusion alone and in combination with 1, 2, and 4 microg/mL fentanyl for seventy-two hours of postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery.
Blake, D; Buckland, M; Etches, R; Gustafsson, U; Halliwell, R; Huizar, K; Marsland, C; Merridew, G; Murphy, D; Paech, M; Schug, SA; Scott, DA; Turner, G; Walker, S, 1999
)
0.71
"The efficacy and safety of postoperative analgesia with continuous epidural infusion of either morphine or fentanyl in combination with a low dose of bupivacaine were evaluated in 205 patients after upper abdominal surgery."( [Postoperative epidural analgesia after upper abdominal surgery: the effects of low concentrations of bupivacaine combined with a low dose of opioid].
Kohno, K; Kosaka, Y; Shiihara, K, 1999
)
0.52
"We reported anesthetic management combined with hypothermia for carotid endarterectomy under somatosensory evoked potential monitoring."( [Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, fentanyl and ketamine for carotid endarterectomy under somatosensory evoked potential monitoring--combination with intraoperative hypothermia].
Fujimine, T; Kakinohana, M; Okuda, Y; Tomiyama, N, 1999
)
0.56
"Both fentanyl and the newer opioid remifentanil, when each is combined with isoflurane and propofol, allowed for fast-track cardiac anesthesia."( A randomized double-blinded multicenter comparison of remifentanil versus fentanyl when combined with isoflurane/propofol for early extubation in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Bowdle, TA; Bukenya, D; Cheng, D; Hillel, Z; Hogue, C; Howie, MB; Newman, MF; Pierce, ET, 2001
)
1.06
" This study was to compare the analgesic and side effects of intravenous ketorolac with that of intravenous fentanyl, in combination with midazolam in ESWL."( Effects of intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl combined with midazolam on analgesia and side effects during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Cherng, CH; Ho, ST; Wong, CS; Yang, CP, 2002
)
0.8
"Both intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl in combination with midazolam could provide good anesthesia for ESWL."( Effects of intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl combined with midazolam on analgesia and side effects during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Cherng, CH; Ho, ST; Wong, CS; Yang, CP, 2002
)
0.87
" An opioid can be combined with local anaesthetic to reduce the incidence of side-effects and to improve analgesia for the relief of labour pain."( Comparison of bupivacaine 0.2% and ropivacaine 0.2% combined with fentanyl for epidural analgesia during labour.
Alkiş, N; Aşik, I; Göktuğ, A; Gülay, I; Uysalel, A, 2002
)
0.55
"2% combined with fentanyl produced equivalent analgesia for pain relief during labour and delivery."( Comparison of bupivacaine 0.2% and ropivacaine 0.2% combined with fentanyl for epidural analgesia during labour.
Alkiş, N; Aşik, I; Göktuğ, A; Gülay, I; Uysalel, A, 2002
)
0.89
"This study examined the intra-operative and postoperative characteristics of a remifentanil infusion alone, or intermittent fentanyl bolus admistration combined with a propofol infusion, for the anaesthetic management of patients undergoing shock wave lithotripsy."( A comparison of anaesthetic techniques for shock wave lithotripsy: the use of a remifentanil infusion alone compared to intermittent fentanyl boluses combined with a low dose propofol infusion.
Blanc, I; Brauer, P; Burmeister, MA; Graefen, M; Standl, TG; Wintruff, M, 2002
)
0.73
" Therefore, intrathecal opioids combined with a low dose of epidural local anesthetics for Cesarean section is suitable for critically ill patients with malignant abdominal tumors, such as a Krukenberg tumor, complicated by massive ascites."( Intrathecal fentanyl/meperidine combined with low-dose epidural bupivacaine for Cesarean section in a patient with advanced Krukenberg tumors.
Amano, K; Hoka, S; Hoshino, Y; Okamoto, H; Okutomi, T, 2002
)
0.69
"To investigate the pain-relieving effects of ropivacaine or its combination with fentanyl in postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia."( [Ropivacaine or its combination with fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia].
Chen, M; Chen, YM; Gu, MN; Liang, SW; Lin, CS; Xiao, JF, 2003
)
0.82
" Our aim in the present study was to evaluate the effects of 2% hyperbaric mepivacaine alone, or combined with either intrathecal fentanyl (5 and 10 microg), or sufentanil (2."( Intrathecal fentanyl, sufentanil, or placebo combined with hyperbaric mepivacaine 2% for parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.
Alparslan, Y; Birnbach, DJ; Bremerich, DH; Byhahn, C; Hall, BA; Kessler, P; Meininger, D; Nordmeyer, J, 2003
)
0.9
"Sensory, motor, and analgesic block characteristics of the local anesthetic mepivacaine alone or combined with intrathecal opioids were studied in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery in a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial."( Intrathecal fentanyl, sufentanil, or placebo combined with hyperbaric mepivacaine 2% for parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery.
Alparslan, Y; Birnbach, DJ; Bremerich, DH; Byhahn, C; Hall, BA; Kessler, P; Meininger, D; Nordmeyer, J, 2003
)
0.7
"kg-1 combined with a regional anaesthetic block is associated with an increased incidence of PONV without any significant contribution to the postoperative pain relief."( Increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting without additional analgesic effects when a low dose of intravenous fentanyl is combined with a caudal block.
Kokinsky, E; Larsson, LE; Nilsson, K, 2003
)
0.53
"We investigated the duration of labor analgesia produced by a small dose of spinal bupivacaine/fentanyl alone or in combination with a small dose of morphine."( Small dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal analgesia combined with morphine for labor.
Hess, PE; Pratt, SD; Snowman, C; Vasudevan, A, 2003
)
0.85
"Only a relatively short immediate analgesic benefit could be demonstrated by a combination of IINB with spinal anaesthesia compared with IINB combined with general anaesthesia."( Analgesia and discharge following preincisional ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block combined with general or spinal anaesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy.
Permi, J; Rosenberg, PH; Toivonen, J, 2004
)
0.32
"The efficiency of bilateral paravertebral blockade combined with general anaesthesia (active) vs."( General anaesthesia combined with bilateral paravertebral blockade (T5-6) vs. general anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Lönnqvist, PA; Naja, MZ; Ziade, MF, 2004
)
0.32
" Overall, administration of fentanyl TTS had a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in horses with clinical pain, and the fentanyl TTS in combination with NSAIDs appeared to provide safe and effective analgesia in most of the horses with pain that was refractory to NSAID therapy alone."( Transdermal fentanyl combined with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia in horses.
Kollias-Baker, C; Maxwell, LK; Slovis, N; Thomasy, SM,
)
0.8
"To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of anesthesia with intravenous propofol combined with fentanyl for ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval."( [Intravenous propofol combined with fentanyl for anesthesia during ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval].
Chen, SL; Chen, Y; Liu, GW; Shi, YS; Xu, JS, 2004
)
0.82
"Anesthesia with propofol combined with fentanyl may reduce the maintenance dosage of propofol, shorten the time of consciousness recovery during oocyte retrieval with ultrasound guidance, and can be helpful for the patients' early recovery and discharge from hospital."( [Intravenous propofol combined with fentanyl for anesthesia during ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval].
Chen, SL; Chen, Y; Liu, GW; Shi, YS; Xu, JS, 2004
)
0.87
"This study was conducted to compare the effects of intravenous fentanyl and intravenous fentanyl combined with bupivacaine infiltration on the hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion."( The effects of intravenous fentanyl and intravenous fentanyl combined with bupivacaine infiltration on the hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion.
Akin, A; Boyaci, A; Dogru, K; Kotanoglu, MS; Madenoglu, H; Yildiz, K, 2005
)
0.86
" Propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines can be titrated to moderate sedation, which might be safer."( Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy.
Rex, DK; VanNatta, ME, 2006
)
0.33
"Propofol in combination with fentanyl and/or midazolam can be titrated to moderate levels of sedation without substantial loss of satisfaction and with shorter recovery times compared with propofol titrated to deep sedation throughout the procedure."( Propofol alone titrated to deep sedation versus propofol in combination with opioids and/or benzodiazepines and titrated to moderate sedation for colonoscopy.
Rex, DK; VanNatta, ME, 2006
)
0.63
"To investigate the clinical efficacy of and complications arising from low-dose ketamine combined with fentanyl for intravenous postoperative analgesia in comparison with the exclusive use of fentanyl in elderly patients."( [Low-dose ketamine combined with fentanyl for intravenous postoperative analgesia in elderly patients].
Chen, YM; Liang, SW; Lin, CS, 2006
)
0.83
"For producing comparable postoperative analgesic effect, low-dose ketamine combined with fentanyl can markedly reduce fentanyl requirement in the elderly patients and lowers the incidences of nausea, vomiting and itching in comparison with the exclusive use of fentanyl."( [Low-dose ketamine combined with fentanyl for intravenous postoperative analgesia in elderly patients].
Chen, YM; Liang, SW; Lin, CS, 2006
)
0.84
"To investigate the effects, side-effects and security of bupivacaine, ropivacaine combined with fentanyl in postoperative continuous epidural analgesia."( [Security evaluation of bupivacaine, ropivacaine combined with fentanyl in postoperative continuous epidural analgesia].
Huang, HQ; Huang, QQ; Su, MX; Wan, LJ; Wan, XH, 2006
)
0.79
" The results therefore indicate that TTS-F offers more effective pain relief than codeine/paracetamol, in combination with R/T, in patients with metastatic bone pain, obtaining complete treatment satisfaction matched by improvements in their QoL."( Comparison of transdermal fentanyl with codeine/paracetamol, in combination with radiotherapy, for the management of metastatic bone pain.
Katsouda, E; Kouloulias, V; Kouvaris, J; Mystakidou, K; Tsiatas, M; Vlahos, L,
)
0.43
"This is the first dose-finding study specifically designed to estimate the ED95 of intrathecal bupivacaine combined with a fixed amount of fentanyl for analgesia in active labor."( Determination of the ED95 for intrathecal plain bupivacaine combined with fentanyl in active labor.
Carvalho, JC; Goldszmidt, E; Parkes, RK; Whitty, R, 2007
)
0.77
"The experimental setup consisted of a randomized block design with four experimental groups: two light (3/4) minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) isoflurane anesthesia groups (unstimulated/NIWR-stimulated) and two NIWR-stimulated surgical anesthesia groups (1(1/2) MAC isoflurane anesthesia and (3/4) MAC isoflurane anesthesia combined with fentanyl 400-600 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1))."( Suppression of noxious-induced c-fos expression in the rat lumbar spinal cord by isoflurane alone or combined with fentanyl.
Nguyen, NK; Ritskes-Hoitinga, M; Sommers, MG; van Egmond, J; Veening, JG; Vissers, KC, 2008
)
0.73
"This study demonstrates that the NIWR model combined with spinal Fos-immunoreactivity is a suitable and useful model for evaluating the differential effects of inhaled anesthetics and opioids on nociceptive information transfer during general anesthesia."( Suppression of noxious-induced c-fos expression in the rat lumbar spinal cord by isoflurane alone or combined with fentanyl.
Nguyen, NK; Ritskes-Hoitinga, M; Sommers, MG; van Egmond, J; Veening, JG; Vissers, KC, 2008
)
0.56
"To compare the effects of fentanyl or remifentanil in combination with midazolam on hemodynamic parameters, pain, and satisfaction profile in cataract surgery."( Remifentanil versus fentanyl in combination with midazolam for retrobulbar block in cataract surgery.
Bahadir, M; Cok, OY; Ertan, A, 2008
)
0.97
"To observe analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with target-controlled infusion (TCI) in general anesthesia and effects on cardiovascular system."( [Analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with target-controlled infusion in general anesthesia and effects on cardiovascular system].
He, BM; Yang, B, 2008
)
0.35
"To investigate the effect of epidural ropivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor analgesia on the clinical outcome of labor."( [Influence of epidural ropivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor analgesia on the clinical outcome of labor].
Chen, TM; Li, CX; Li, Q; Liu, Y; Xue, WN, 2008
)
0.83
"15% ropivacaine in combination with fentany (1microg/ml) and 175 without epidural analgesia."( [Influence of epidural ropivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor analgesia on the clinical outcome of labor].
Chen, TM; Li, CX; Li, Q; Liu, Y; Xue, WN, 2008
)
0.59
"Epidural ropivacaine in combination with fentanyl in labor can decrease the incidence of cesarean section, and the duration of the active stage can be shortened with application of ocytocin."( [Influence of epidural ropivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor analgesia on the clinical outcome of labor].
Chen, TM; Li, CX; Li, Q; Liu, Y; Xue, WN, 2008
)
0.86
"To compare the hemodynamics and post-anesthetic recovery of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil or fentanyl combined with propofol administered by target controlled infusion (TCI) in neurosurgery."( [Remifentanil and fentanyl combined with propofol administered by target controlled infusion in neurosurgery].
Bai, N; Cheng, Z; Guo, Q; Wang, Y; Yang, S, 2009
)
0.9
"TIVA with remifentanil or fentanyl combined with propofol administered by TCI in neurosurgical operation can provided steadible hemodynamics."( [Remifentanil and fentanyl combined with propofol administered by target controlled infusion in neurosurgery].
Bai, N; Cheng, Z; Guo, Q; Wang, Y; Yang, S, 2009
)
0.99
"a To observe the analgesic effect of fentanyl combined with flurbiprofen axetil for postoperative analgesia after gynecologic surgery."( [Postoperative analgesia with fentanyl combined with flurbiprofen axetil following gynecologic surgery for turnor].
Bai, XH; Cao, LH; Lin, WQ; Wen, LL; Zhong, ZJ, 2009
)
0.91
"Flurbiprofen axetil combined with fentanyl for postoperative analgesia can significantly reduce fentanyl dose and the incidence of adverse effects associated with fentanyl without obviously affecting the coagulation and gastrointestinal functions."( [Postoperative analgesia with fentanyl combined with flurbiprofen axetil following gynecologic surgery for turnor].
Bai, XH; Cao, LH; Lin, WQ; Wen, LL; Zhong, ZJ, 2009
)
0.92
" This study compared, in donor right hepatectomy, the efficacy and safety of preoperative intrathecal morphine (ITM) combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) with IV-PCA alone."( Intrathecal morphine combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia is an effective and safe method for immediate postoperative pain control in live liver donors.
Ahn, HJ; Cho, HS; Choi, SJ; Gwak, MS; Hahm, TS; Joh, JW; Kim, GS; Kim, JA; Kim, KM; Ko, JS, 2009
)
0.35
"Spinal anesthesia combined with fentanyl sometimes induces sedation."( [Specific gravity of bupivacaine with fentanyl influences bispectral index value during spinal anesthesia combined with fentanyl in patients undergoing cesarean section].
Kimoto, M; Murao, K; Nakamoto, M; Nakao, S; Shingu, K, 2009
)
0.91
"The objective of this study was to determine the effects of a constant rate of infusion of lidocaine and ketamine in combination with either morphine or fentanyl on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane (MAC(ISO)) during ovariohysterectomy in dogs."( Reduction of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in dogs using a constant rate of infusion of lidocaine-ketamine in combination with either morphine or fentanyl.
Aguado, D; Benito, J; Gómez de Segura, IA, 2011
)
0.76
" dose of dexamethasone in combination with caudal block on postoperative analgesia in children."( Effect of dexamethasone in combination with caudal analgesia on postoperative pain control in day-case paediatric orchiopexy.
Han, SW; Hong, JY; Kil, HK; Kim, EJ; Kim, WO, 2010
)
0.36
"5 mg kg(-1) in combination with a caudal block augmented the intensity and duration of postoperative analgesia without adverse effects in children undergoing day-case paediatric orchiopexy."( Effect of dexamethasone in combination with caudal analgesia on postoperative pain control in day-case paediatric orchiopexy.
Han, SW; Hong, JY; Kil, HK; Kim, EJ; Kim, WO, 2010
)
0.36
"Our prospective, randomized, double-blind study aimed to detect the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on the postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section."( [Assessment of the effect of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl or morphine on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesarean section].
Acar, P; Akyol, O; Ozyuvacı, E; Toprak, N; Vatansever, S, 2010
)
0.8
" First of all, once assessed that all drugs induced dose-related antinociceptive effects, they were mixed in fixed ratio (1:1) combinations and a synergistic drug-drug interaction was obtained in all circumstances."( Fentanyl-trazodone-paracetamol triple drug combination: multimodal analgesia in a mouse model of visceral pain.
Ciruela, F; Fernández, A; Fernández-Dueñas, V; Planas, E; Poveda, R; Sánchez, S, 2011
)
1.81
" The aim of this study was to investigate the block characteristics, the clinical efficacy, surgeon and patient satisfaction, and hemodynamic effects of using different doses of intrathecal plain levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl."( A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study.
Firat, V; Gunusen, I; Karaman, S; Sargin, A, 2011
)
0.78
"5) or 10 mg (group 10), all combined with fentanyl 25, 15 or 10 μg, respectively."( A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study.
Firat, V; Gunusen, I; Karaman, S; Sargin, A, 2011
)
0.86
"5 mg combined with fentanyl 15 μg is suitable for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section."( A randomized comparison of different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine combined with fentanyl for elective cesarean section: prospective, double-blinded study.
Firat, V; Gunusen, I; Karaman, S; Sargin, A, 2011
)
0.92
"001), with the combination with propofol giving more favorable results."( Sedation, analgesia, and cardiorespiratory function in colonoscopy using midazolam combined with fentanyl or propofol.
Shen, SR; Tang, WL; Wang, F; Xiao, DH; Xu, CX, 2011
)
0.59
" The combination with fentanyl had a significantly lower effect on pulse rate and blood pressure."( Sedation, analgesia, and cardiorespiratory function in colonoscopy using midazolam combined with fentanyl or propofol.
Shen, SR; Tang, WL; Wang, F; Xiao, DH; Xu, CX, 2011
)
0.9
" In addition, etomidate in combination with fentanyl had a shorter induction time and ensured haemodynamic stability."( Anaesthesia for cardioversion: a prospective randomised comparison of propofol and etomidate combined with fentanyl.
Askitopoulou, H; Kalogridaki, M; Kanoupakis, EM; Kasotaki, S; Mavrakis, HE; Panteli, A; Souvatzis, X; Vardas, P,
)
0.61
"The hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) influence the pharmacokinetics of several drug classes and are involved in many clinical drug-drug interactions."( Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
Artursson, P; Haglund, U; Karlgren, M; Kimoto, E; Lai, Y; Norinder, U; Vildhede, A; Wisniewski, JR, 2012
)
0.38
"To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with fentanyl in patients undergoing anesthesia induction by sevoflurane."( [Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with fentanyl in patients undergoing anesthesia induction by sevoflurane].
Feng, C; Gao, DP; Han, BQ; Ma, XS; Qi, SH; Zou, YM, 2012
)
0.89
"Eighty patients for elective endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia operations were randomly and double-blindly divided into Dex combined with fentanyl group (Group DF) and the fentanyl group (Group F) from April 2011 to September 2011 at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, and there were 40 cases in each group."( [Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with fentanyl in patients undergoing anesthesia induction by sevoflurane].
Feng, C; Gao, DP; Han, BQ; Ma, XS; Qi, SH; Zou, YM, 2012
)
0.84
"Dexmedetomidine in combination with fentanyl can inhibit stress response of tracheal intubation of sevoflurane induction efficiently and stabilize hemodynamics."( [Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with fentanyl in patients undergoing anesthesia induction by sevoflurane].
Feng, C; Gao, DP; Han, BQ; Ma, XS; Qi, SH; Zou, YM, 2012
)
0.92
" We aimed to determine the analgesic and adverse effects of intrathecal neostigmine combined with hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl."( Analgesic effect of intrathecal neostigmine combined with bupivacaine and fentanyl.
Akinwale, MO; Akinyemi, OA; Sotunmbi, PT, 2012
)
0.82
"To compare the cardiopulmonary effects and the quality of anesthesia of the extradural lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or morphine in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy."( Extradural anesthesia with lidocaine combined with fentanyl or methadone to ovariohisterectomy in dogs.
Bernardi, CA; Cassu, RN; Diniz, MS; Kanashiro, GP; Nicácio, GM, 2013
)
0.85
"The extradural lidocaine in combination with fentanyl or morphine allowed cardiopulmonary stability, however sufficient sensitive blockade was not provided in 100% of the dogs."( Extradural anesthesia with lidocaine combined with fentanyl or methadone to ovariohisterectomy in dogs.
Bernardi, CA; Cassu, RN; Diniz, MS; Kanashiro, GP; Nicácio, GM, 2013
)
0.9
" This study was designed to compare the efficacy of intrathecal (IT) morphine alone, or in combination with bupivacaine and fentanyl, as part of a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia, in patients undergoing elective total gastrectomy."( Comparison of analgesic effect of intrathecal morphine alone or in combination with bupivacaine and fentanyl in patients undergoing total gastrectomy: a prospective randomized, double blind clinical trial.
Gerić, V; Ivanoviić, N; Karanikolas, M; Randjelović, T; Rasković, J; Slavković, Z; Stamenković, DM; Tomić, A; Veljović, M, 2013
)
0.81
" The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of fentanyl buccal tablet in breakthrough pain management in combination with around-the-clock opioids with the dose adjustment option, and explore the dose adjustment's influence on breakthrough pain management using detailed evaluation."( Breakthrough pain management using fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) in combination with around-the-clock (ATC) opioids based on the efficacy and safety of FBT, and its relationship with ATC opioids: results from an open-label, multi-center study in Japanese c
Adachi, I; Eguchi, K; Goto, F; Matoba, M; Shima, Y; Takigawa, C; Tanda, S; Yomiya, K; Yoshimoto, T, 2015
)
0.93
"The purpose of this study was to evaluate comparatively, in women undergoing caesarean section under spinal anesthesia, the effectiveness of hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with 3 different adjuvants (fentanyl, clonidine, and dexmedtomidine) on quality of blockade and maternal and neonatal repercussions."( A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Combined with Different Adjuvants (Fentanyl, Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine) in Caesarean Section.
Huang, AJ; Li, AZ; Li, KZ; Li, Z; Qi, J; Shi, CX; Tian, M; Xin, DQ; Zhang, CY, 2015
)
0.81
" In conclusion, BUPI-FEN combination exhibits significantly better tolerability at an approximate ratio of 6 FEN:1 SUF, albeit, both fentanyl and sufentanil in combination with bupivacaine provide similar analgesic properties via the epidural or intrathecal routes for labor pain relief."( Bupivacaine in combination with fentanyl or sufentanil in epidural/intrathecal analgesia for labor: a meta-analysis.
Gao, C; Li, B; Wang, H, 2015
)
0.9
"To explore the anesthetic effect and neonatal effects of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in the cesarean section under epidural anesthesia."( [Application of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in the cesarean section under epidural anesthesia].
Ding, Z; Han, C; Jiang, X; Wu, X, 2014
)
0.4
"Administration of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine can provide early onset, establishment of sensory anesthesia, much better sedation levels, decrease the degree of traction reaction and the incidence of shivering, and without adverse neonatal effects."( [Application of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine in the cesarean section under epidural anesthesia].
Ding, Z; Han, C; Jiang, X; Wu, X, 2014
)
0.4
"In combination with fentanyl, bupivacaine and ropivacaine exhibit comparable efficacy and safety."( Epidural analgesia with amide local anesthetics, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor pain relief: a meta-analysis.
Fan, Y; Hu, C; Li, Y; Wang, H; Xu, H, 2015
)
0.96
"We carried out a retrospective investigation on the effect of obesity on dexmedetomidine (DEX) requirements when administered with fentanyl (FEN) during mechanical ventilation after major surgeries."( THE EFFECT OF OBESITY ON DOSE OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE WHEN ADMINISTERED WITH FENTANYL DURING POSTOPERATIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION--RETROSPECTIVE.
Hakozaki, T; Hosono, A; Imaizumi, T; Iseki, Y; Isosu, T; Mogami, M; Morimoto, I; Murakawa, M; Nakano, Y; Obara, S; Oishi, R, 2015
)
0.85
"This study explored the sedative and analgesic effects of fentanyl combined with propofol via an intrathecal chemotherapy injection for acute leukemia (acute lymphocytic leukemia or acute myelocytic leukemia) among children, to relieve pain and difficulty during intrathecal injection, improve treatment compliance, increase the success rate of single puncture, and reduce procedure failure, with the aim of developing a painless procedure for children with acute leukemia."( Rapid sedation induced by fentanyl combined with propofol via an intrathecal chemotherapy injection for leukemia in children.
Lao, JQ; Tian, X; Tian, YY; Wang, HP; Wei, HY; Yang, YH, 2015
)
0.96
"Propofol is routinely combined with opioid analgesics to ensure adequate anesthesia during surgery."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol and fentanyl in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery - a study of pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions.
Bieda, K; Bienert, A; Borsuk, A; Grześkowiak, E; Hartmann-Sobczyńska, R; Kokot, ZJ; Matysiak, J; Przybyłowski, K; Sobczyński, P; Wiczling, P, 2016
)
0.68
" We investigated the efficacy of the continuous intravenous infuion of fentanyl combined with intercostal nerve block, in comparison with the continuous epidural analgesia."( [Postoperative Analgesia for Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery--Continuous Intravenous Infusion of Fentanyl Combined with Intercostal Nerve Block v.s. Continuous Epidural Analgesia].
Hiro, K; Kurata, M; Oi, Y; Okuda, M; Sugiyama, T, 2016
)
0.88
"Continuous intravenous infusion of fentanyl combined with intercostal nerve block is effective in the postoperative analgesia for VATS, as well as continuous epidural analgesia."( [Postoperative Analgesia for Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery--Continuous Intravenous Infusion of Fentanyl Combined with Intercostal Nerve Block v.s. Continuous Epidural Analgesia].
Hiro, K; Kurata, M; Oi, Y; Okuda, M; Sugiyama, T, 2016
)
0.93
" The aim of the study was to determine the effects of constant-rate infusion of lidocaine and ketamine combined with either morphine or fentanyl on the MAC of sevoflurane in pigs."( Effect of Lidocaine-Ketamine Infusions Combined with Morphine or Fentanyl in Sevoflurane-Anesthetized Pigs.
Canfrán, S; Gómez de Segura, IA; Largo, C; Re, M, 2016
)
0.88
"Low-dose ropivacaine combined with intrathecal fentanyl can provide adequate anaesthesia with minimal haemodynamic variation."( EFFECT OF PREOPERATIVE INTRAVENOUS OXYCODONE ON LOW-DOSE ROPIVACAINE SPINAL ANESTHESIA COMBINED WITH INTRATHECAL FENTANYL.
Fu, Y; Wang, J; Wang, N; Zhang, S, 2016
)
0.9
"To assess the efficacy of preoperative intravenous oxycodone on transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) under 10 mg ropivacaine spinal anaesthesia combined with intrathecal 25 pg fentanyl."( EFFECT OF PREOPERATIVE INTRAVENOUS OXYCODONE ON LOW-DOSE ROPIVACAINE SPINAL ANESTHESIA COMBINED WITH INTRATHECAL FENTANYL.
Fu, Y; Wang, J; Wang, N; Zhang, S, 2016
)
0.84
" This trial will evaluate the effects of propofol combined with small doses of dezocine, oxycodone, sufentanil or fentanyl for gastroscopy."( Effect of propofol combined with opioids on cough reflex suppression in gastroscopy: study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Cao, YZ; Lu, X; Xia, J; Xie, J; Yin, N; Yuan, J, 2017
)
0.67
" The objective of this study was to evaluate the anaesthetic effect of several doses of alfaxalone alone, considering differences between sexes, and alfaxalone combined with dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in the rat administered by the intraperitoneal route."( Anaesthetic effects of alfaxalone administered intraperitoneally alone or combined with dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in the rat.
Arenillas, M; Gomez de Segura, IA, 2018
)
0.88
"Introduction: Drug-drug interactions occur more frequently in intensive care units than in other services."( Characterization of potential drug-drug interactions in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Bogotá
Bustamante, C; Hernández, M; Tribiño, G, 2018
)
0.48
" Statistically significant differences were observed for remifentanil in comparison to fentanyl when combined with propofol: Propofol dose (in mg) -76."( Comparison of Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Sufentanil and Alfentanil in Combination with Propofol for General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Sivaramakrishnan, G; Sridharan, K, 2019
)
1.1
"To conclude, we found that remifentanil has a statistically significant anesthetic profile than fentanyl when combined with propofol."( Comparison of Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Sufentanil and Alfentanil in Combination with Propofol for General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Sivaramakrishnan, G; Sridharan, K, 2019
)
1.09
"To compare the propofol infusion rate and cardiopulmonary effects during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol alone and propofol combined with methadone, fentanyl or nalbuphine in domestic chickens undergoing ulna osteotomy."( Total intravenous anesthesia in domestic chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) with propofol alone or in combination with methadone, nalbuphine or fentanyl for ulna osteotomy.
Alievi, MM; Boos, MZ; Gutierrez, LG; Herrera, JR; Mombach, VS; Monteiro, ER; Santos, EA, 2020
)
0.96
"Despite its frequent use in clinical practice, fentanyl's pro-serotonergic effects are underrecognized, especially in combination with linezolid."( Linezolid and fentanyl: An underrecognized drug-to-drug interaction.
Abu Saleh, O; Barth, D; Corsini Campioli, C; Esquer Garrigos, Z; Sia, IG; Sohail, RM, 2020
)
1.18
" Subsequently, the target mapping outcomes were applied to build physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for acetaminophen and fentanyl to explore the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between this pair of drugs."( Pain Chemogenomics Knowledgebase (Pain-CKB) for Systems Pharmacology Target Mapping and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Investigation of Opioid Drug-Drug Interactions.
Bertz, R; Chen, M; Feng, Z; Liang, T; Shen, M; Wang, S; Xie, XQ; Xue, Y, 2020
)
0.76
" The study aimed to find out the prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in the Intensive Care Units of a tertiary care centre."( Potential Drug-drug Interaction among the Patients Admitted in Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Basnet, R; Ghimire, R; Kharel, S; Lamichhane, P; Mudvari, A; Parajuli, S; Pokharel, A; Poudel, N; Prasad, P; Shrestha, PS, 2022
)
0.72
"Out of 101 patients, the prevalence of the drug-drug interaction was found to be 90 (89."( Potential Drug-drug Interaction among the Patients Admitted in Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Basnet, R; Ghimire, R; Kharel, S; Lamichhane, P; Mudvari, A; Parajuli, S; Pokharel, A; Poudel, N; Prasad, P; Shrestha, PS, 2022
)
0.72
"Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions was higher compared to similar published literature."( Potential Drug-drug Interaction among the Patients Admitted in Intensive Care Units of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Basnet, R; Ghimire, R; Kharel, S; Lamichhane, P; Mudvari, A; Parajuli, S; Pokharel, A; Poudel, N; Prasad, P; Shrestha, PS, 2022
)
0.72
"5 years (January 2019-June 2021) of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) and medico-legal death investigation (MDI) cases was investigated, including other drugs detected in combination with xylazine."( Xylazine: Pharmacology Review and Prevalence and Drug Combinations in Forensic Toxicology Casework.
Barbieri, EJ; Kacinko, SL; Logan, BK; Mohr, ALA, 2022
)
0.72
"Its goal was to see how a transdermal fentanyl patch combined with accelerated recovery after surgery (ERAS) affected the treatment efficacy and analgesic effect of liver cancer, as well as to help patients with liver cancer choose the right analgesic treatment and nursing mode."( Effect of Transdermal Fentanyl Patch Combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery on the Curative Effect and Analgesic Effect of Liver Cancer.
Fang, S; Lu, G; Xiao, H; Zhu, H, 2022
)
1.31
" However, the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture combined with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery remains unclear."( Efficacy of electroacupuncture combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.
Feng, Y; Hu, S; Jin, Y; Li, Y; Liu, L; Wang, B; Wang, L; Xiong, B; Yu, X, 2023
)
0.91
"The aim of this study was to compare the effects of constant rate infusions (CRI) of fentanyl alone or combined with lidocaine and ketamine (FLK), on physiological parameters, isoflurane requirements and the number of postoperative analgesic rescues in dogs undergoing unilateral mastectomy."( Influence of Constant Rate Infusions of Fentanyl Alone or in Combination With Lidocaine and Ketamine on the Response to Surgery and Postoperative Pain in Isoflurane Anesthetized Dogs Undergoing Unilateral Mastectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Alievi, MM; de Oliveira, TF; Herrera-Becerra, JR; Marques, ÉJ; Monteiro, ER; Rovaris, IB; Tomazeli, D; Valle, SF,
)
0.62
"The authors sought to quantify the clinical impacts of granisetron, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine combined with fentanyl, for procedural sedation and analgesia in cystoscopy and for bladder catheter tolerance."( Efficacy appraisal of four regimens (granisetron, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine combined with fentanyl) for cystoscopy-associated sedation and analgesia and catheter-related bladder tolerance: a randomized clinical trial.
Almasi-Hashiani, A; Jafarirismani, R; Modir, H; Shamaii, K,
)
0.55
" Propofol is a commonly used sedative, frequently combined with an opioid or low-dose ketamine as an analgesic."( Low-dose ketamine or opioids combined with propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review.
De Vries, LJ; Lameijer, H; Van Roon, EN; Veeger, NJGM, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

Fentanyl, very lipophilic, is rapidly absorbed via intranasal administration with a bioavailability close to 90%. In theory, the transmucosal bioavailability and absorption of fentanyl could be improved by converting more fentanyl to the unionized form by adjusting the surrounding pH.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The rate of absorption of paracetamol following oral administration was used as an indirect measure of the rate of gastric emptying."( Gastric emptying following caesarean section and the effect of epidural fentanyl.
Geddes, SM; Logan, RW; Thorburn, J, 1991
)
0.51
" In order to determine the bioavailability and absorption of fentanyl from OTFC, 12 volunteers were given intravenous fentanyl citrate or OTFC 15 micrograms/kg on each of two occasions."( Absorption and bioavailability of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Ashburn, MA; Hague, BI; Le Maire, L; Stanley, TH; Stanski, DR; Streisand, JB; Tarver, SD; Varvel, JR, 1991
)
0.77
"Fentanyl was administered intravenously and transdermally to eight surgical patients to determine the systemic bioavailability and rate of absorption of the transdermally administered drug."( Absorption characteristics of transdermally administered fentanyl.
Coen, PA; Hwang, SS; Shafer, SL; Stanski, DR; Varvel, JR, 1989
)
1.96
" Plasma concentration-time data for nalmefene indicate good oral bioavailability and a prolonged terminal elimination phase (mean t1/2 11."( Prolonged blockade of opioid effect with oral nalmefene.
DiFazio, CA; Dixon, R; Gal, TJ, 1986
)
0.27
" In order to make risk assessments on the basis of inhalation experiments with animals at dose levels relevant to the human situation, it is important to know the actual absorption rate in the respiratory tract."( Quantitative measurement of the exhalation rate of volatile N-nitrosamines in inhalation experiments with anaesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats.
Klein, RG; Schmezer, P, 1984
)
0.27
" After oral administration, caffeine was absorbed poorly with an apparent bioavailability of 39%."( Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and behavioral effects of caffeine in horses.
Greene, EW; Tobin, T; Woods, WE, 1983
)
0.27
" As a conclusion, it is suggested that altered sensitivity of brain tissue rather than changes in bioavailability must explain variations in dose-response relationship which are frequently believed to be seen when fentanyl is used in patients with chronic drug administration."( [Biotransformation of fentanyl. III. Effect of chronic drug exposure on the distribution, metabolism and excretion in the rat].
Brandt, K; Daub, D; Hunger, L; Lehmann, KA, 1983
)
0.77
" The residual fentanyl in the transdermal fentanyl device was measured, permitting calculation of the absolute bioavailability of transdermally administered fentanyl."( Biopharmaceutics of a new transdermal fentanyl device.
Brand, SC; Browne, S; Cohane, C; Fiset, P; Shafer, SL, 1995
)
0.92
" The bioavailability of transdermally administered fentanyl was 63 +/- 35% coefficient of variation."( Biopharmaceutics of a new transdermal fentanyl device.
Brand, SC; Browne, S; Cohane, C; Fiset, P; Shafer, SL, 1995
)
0.81
" In theory, the transmucosal bioavailability and absorption of fentanyl could be improved by converting more fentanyl to the unionized form by adjusting the surrounding pH."( Buccal absorption of fentanyl is pH-dependent in dogs.
McJames, S; Natte, R; Niu, S; Pace, NL; Streisand, JB; Zhang, J, 1995
)
0.85
" The switch to oral agents must take into consideration the differences in potency, half-life, and oral bioavailability between the agents."( Outpatient therapy of iatrogenic drug dependency following prolonged sedation in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Deshpande, JK; Gregory, DF; Tobias, JD, 1994
)
0.29
" The bioavailability of sublingual and buccal opioids is better as the uptake of active drug is governed by local blood flow."( [Are there indications for oral or sublingual administration of morphines?].
Spielvogel, C, 1994
)
0.29
"Intravenous pharmacokinetics of fentanyl was similar to those previously described in dogs and provided the distribution and clearance data necessary to calculate the rate of absorption of the transdermally administered opioid."( Disposition of transdermally administered fentanyl in dogs.
Hardie, EM; Kyles, AE; Papich, M, 1996
)
0.84
" Time-averaged bioavailability based upon nominal doses averaged approximately 100%, and was > 50% within 5 min of delivery."( Pulmonary administration of aerosolised fentanyl: pharmacokinetic analysis of systemic delivery.
Eltherington, LG; Farr, SJ; Mather, LE; Rubsamen, RA; Ward, ME; Woodhouse, A, 1998
)
0.57
"Estimated fentanyl bioavailability (mean +/- SD) was low (36."( Uptake pharmacokinetics of the Fentanyl Oralet in children scheduled for central venous access removal: implications for the timing of initiating painful procedures.
Avram, MJ; Birmingham, PK; Coté, CJ; Dsida, RM; Wang, Z; Wheeler, M, 2002
)
1
" The primary outcome was the bioavailability of nasal fentanyl in comparison with intravenous fentanyl."( A new formulation of nasal fentanyl spray for postoperative analgesia: a pilot study.
Banks, SL; Doherty, DA; Lim, CB; Paech, MJ; Rucklidge, MW, 2003
)
0.86
" Our study also suggested that increased subcutaneous fat delayed the rate of absorption of fentanyl."( Postoperative pain management using fentanyl patches in dogs.
Das, SR; Gilbert, DB; Motzel, SL, 2003
)
0.81
"The bioavailability of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) in children is similar to that of fentanyl solution administered orally to adults."( The pharmacokinetics of the intravenous formulation of fentanyl citrate administered orally in children undergoing general anesthesia.
Birmingham, PK; Coté, CJ; Heffner, CL; Lugo, RA; Wheeler, M, 2004
)
0.84
"Mean+/-SD release rate of fentanyl from the patch, defined by its absorption rate through the non-rate-limiting cellulose membrane, was linear during the first 8 hours (2."( Investigation of in vitro transdermal absorption of fentanyl from patches placed on skin samples obtained from various anatomic regions of dogs.
Cross, SE; Magnusson, BM; Mills, PC, 2004
)
0.87
" A mean bioavailability of 78% was estimated; the total clearance averaged 41 L/h."( Inter- and intraindividual variabilities in pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after repeated 72-hour transdermal applications in cancer pain patients.
Bressolle, F; Caumette, L; Culine, S; Garcia, F; Pinguet, F; Poujol, S; Solassol, I, 2005
)
0.57
" The bioavailability of fentanyl was statistically different according to patient age."( Inter- and intra-individual variability in transdermal fentanyl absorption in cancer pain patients.
Astre, C; Bressolle, F; Caumette, L; Coulouma, R; Culine, S; Garcia, F; Pinguet, F; Solassol, I; Thézenas, S, 2005
)
0.88
" The results of the second study paralleled those from the first, suggesting that the bioavailability of fentanyl delivered by the PCTS increases as a function of time and is likely to be independent of dosing frequency."( The effect of dosing frequency on the pharmacokinetics of a fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS).
Gidwani, S; Gupta, S; Sathyan, G; Zomorodi, K, 2005
)
0.78
"This finding has implications for the bioavailability of fentanyl at extremes of body temperature in association with the clinical acid-base management of the patient."( pKa of fentanyl varies with temperature: implications for acid-base management during extremes of body temperature.
Cross, DA; Pace, CN; Scholtz, JM; Thurlkill, RL, 2005
)
1.03
" This kind of absorption avoids first-pass metabolism, yielding a bioavailability substantially greater than oral administration."( Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate: overview of pharmacological and clinical characteristics.
Katsouda, E; Mystakidou, K; Parpa, E; Tsiatas, ML; Vlahos, L,
)
0.47
"The primary objective of this study was to compare the relative bioavailability of FEBT 1,080 microg with that of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) 1,600 microg, and the secondary objective was to assess the dose proportionality of FEBT 270 to 1,300 microg in healthy adult volunteers."( Relative bioavailability of the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet (FEBT) 1,080 pg versus oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate 1,600 pg and dose proportionality of FEBT 270 to 1,300 microg: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, three-period study in healt
Darwish, M; Kirby, M; Tempero, K; Thompson, J, 2006
)
0.82
" Fentanyl is more rapidly absorbed and bioavailability is higher from FBT than from the oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate formulation."( Fentanyl buccal tablet: in breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer.
Blick, SK; Wagstaff, AJ, 2006
)
2.69
" The transmucosal FBT had the highest absolute bioavailability (0."( Absolute and relative bioavailability of fentanyl buccal tablet and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Darwish, M; Jiang, JG; Kirby, M; Robertson, P; Tracewell, W, 2007
)
0.61
"Fentanyl is a potent opioid that is well absorbed via the oral mucosa."( Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate versus placebo for painful dressing changes: a crossover trial.
Barker, L; Larsen, D; MacIntyre, PA; Margetts, L, 2007
)
2.12
" FBT utilizes OraVescent technology to improve bioavailability and speed of drug delivery."( Fentanyl buccal tablet: faster rescue analgesia for breakthrough pain?
Hanna, M; Lecybyl, R, 2007
)
1.78
" Though oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate has reduced bioavailability (25%), it inherits potential for breakthrough pain management."( Pediatric palliative care: use of opioids for the management of pain.
Anderson, BJ; Craig, F; Michel, E; Zernikow, B, 2009
)
0.65
" However, an exchange of the reference with a generic with higher bioavailability would trigger respiratory depression only in extreme situations and is clinically supported by only a single case report."( Bioequivalence criteria for transdermal fentanyl generics: do these need a relook?
Felden, L; Lötsch, J; Walter, C, 2009
)
0.62
" This allows for an increased bioavailability when inhaled."( Potential biomarkers of smoked fentanyl utilizing pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Bell, SC; Callery, PS; Kraner, JC; Nishikawa, RK, 2009
)
0.64
"Absorption of subcutaneous fentanyl was relatively rapid and similar to the rate of absorption previously reported for subcutaneous morphine; the terminal half-life for fentanyl was substantially longer (10 h) than that of morphine (2."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after subcutaneous administration in volunteers.
Capper, SJ; Geue, JP; Loo, S; Ludbrook, GL; Macintyre, PE; Ong, J; Upton, RN, 2010
)
0.98
" Bioavailability compared with OTFC was significantly greater for all nasal fentanyl formulations (FPNS 132."( Pharmacokinetic comparisons of three nasal fentanyl formulations; pectin, chitosan and chitosan-poloxamer 188.
Fisher, A; Knight, A; Smith, A; Watling, M, 2010
)
0.85
"The objectives of the study were to determine the absolute bioavailability of fentanyl from fentanyl buccal soluble film, estimate the percentage of a fentanyl dose absorbed through the buccal mucosa, and compare the bioavailability of equivalent doses administered either as single or multiple dose units."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal soluble film.
Finn, AL; Gever, LN; Tagarro, I; Vasisht, N, 2010
)
0.87
"The two buccal film treatments were bioequivalent and both had an absolute bioavailability of 71%."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal soluble film.
Finn, AL; Gever, LN; Tagarro, I; Vasisht, N, 2010
)
0.64
" Intranasal fentanyl has a bioavailability of 89%, with a short onset of action ( approximately 7 min) and duration times ( approximately 1 h)."( Intranasal fentanyl: from pharmacokinetics and bioavailability to current treatment applications.
Mystakidou, K; Panagiotou, I, 2010
)
1.13
" This single-dose volunteer study compared the pharmacokinetics of FPNS 100, 200, 400, and 800 µg doses and assessed bioavailability relative to oral transmucosal fentanyl (OTFC) 200 µg."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100 - 800 µg in healthy volunteers.
Fisher, A; Knight, A; Smith, A; Watling, M, 2010
)
0.81
" Mean relative bioavailability of FPNS to OTFC ranged from 103% to 163%."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100 - 800 µg in healthy volunteers.
Fisher, A; Knight, A; Smith, A; Watling, M, 2010
)
0.62
"FPNS has a shorter tmax, higher Cmax and greater bioavailability than OTFC and is well tolerated."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100 - 800 µg in healthy volunteers.
Fisher, A; Knight, A; Smith, A; Watling, M, 2010
)
0.62
" Among morphinic drugs, fentanyl, very lipophilic, is rapidly absorbed via intranasal administration with a bioavailability close to 90%."( [Intranasal delivery of systemic drugs: a new route for opioid drugs].
Advenier, C; Blouquit-Laye, S; Buenestado, A; Devillier, P; Grassin-Delyle, S; Naline, E,
)
0.44
" Although the plasma fentanyl concentration was significantly correlated with its measured absorption rate, the measured absorption rate normalized fentanyl concentration showed a large inter-individual variation."( Simple and rapid HPLC-UV method using an ultrafine particle octadecylsilane for determination of residual fentanyl in applied Durotep MT transdermal matrix patches and its clinical application.
Kawakami, J; Naito, T; Takashina, Y; Yagi, T, 2012
)
0.91
" In this phase I study we investigated the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a fentanyl wafer in healthy volunteers."( A phase I pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study of a sublingual fentanyl wafer in healthy volunteers.
Lim, CB; Liu, Y; Paech, MJ; Schug, SA; Sunderland, VB, 2012
)
0.84
"The mean absolute bioavailability of the sublingual fentanyl wafer was 78."( A phase I pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study of a sublingual fentanyl wafer in healthy volunteers.
Lim, CB; Liu, Y; Paech, MJ; Schug, SA; Sunderland, VB, 2012
)
0.86
" The absolute bioavailability of 78."( A phase I pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study of a sublingual fentanyl wafer in healthy volunteers.
Lim, CB; Liu, Y; Paech, MJ; Schug, SA; Sunderland, VB, 2012
)
0.61
" A mean absorption rate of ≥ 2 μg · kg/h was maintained from 2 to 144 h following dorsal application and from 2 to 264 h following ventral application."( Pharmacokinetics and the effect of application site on a novel, long-acting transdermal fentanyl solution in healthy laboratory Beagles.
Clark, TP; Freise, KJ; Newbound, GC; Tudan, C, 2012
)
0.6
" The delivery of different opioids by the pulmonary route has been inconsistent, usually resulting in low bioavailability of the drug."( Inhaled fentanyl aerosol in healthy volunteers: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Cassella, JV; Gan, TJ; Habib, AS; Ho, KY; Ikeda, K; Macleod, DB; Spyker, DA, 2012
)
0.81
"4 pg×h/ml); but, more clinically relevant were the delayed rate of absorption (tmax 53 minutes) and reduced Cmax (235."( Impact of allergic rhinitis and its treatment on the pharmacokinetics of nasally administered fentanyl.
Fisher, AN; Knight, A; Perelman, M; Smith, A, 2013
)
0.61
"To compare rate of absorption and systemic bioavailability between FSS and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) in healthy volunteers."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl sublingual spray and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study.
Chavan, A; Dillaha, L; Goskonda, V; Parikh, N, 2013
)
0.89
" Systemic bioavailability was also greater with FSS than with OTFC (approximately 76% vs 51%)."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl sublingual spray and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study.
Chavan, A; Dillaha, L; Goskonda, V; Parikh, N, 2013
)
0.67
"Absorption of fentanyl in this study was faster and bioavailability was greater with FSS than with OTFC."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl sublingual spray and oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study.
Chavan, A; Dillaha, L; Goskonda, V; Parikh, N, 2013
)
1.03
"The objective of this study was to prepare a novel fentanyl wafer formulation by a freeze-drying method, and to evaluate its in vitro and in vivo release characteristics, including its bioavailability via the sublingual route."( In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a sublingual fentanyl wafer formulation.
Lim, SC; Liu, Y; Paech, MJ; Sunderland, B, 2013
)
0.9
" The absolute bioavailability of the fentanyl wafer was evaluated in 11 opioid-naïve adult female patients using a randomized crossover design."( In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a sublingual fentanyl wafer formulation.
Lim, SC; Liu, Y; Paech, MJ; Sunderland, B, 2013
)
0.92
" The median absolute bioavailability was 53."( In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a sublingual fentanyl wafer formulation.
Lim, SC; Liu, Y; Paech, MJ; Sunderland, B, 2013
)
0.65
"The primary objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of 5 different doses (100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 μg) of fentanyl sublingual spray in healthy subjects under fasted conditions (part A); the secondary objective was to assess the effects of temperature and pH in the oral cavity on relative bioavailability of fentanyl (part B)."( Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of fentanyl sublingual spray: a single-dose 5-way crossover study.
Chavan, A; Dillaha, L; Goskonda, V; Parikh, N, 2013
)
0.85
" Altering the local environment of the oral cavity (temperature and pH) showed no effects on the bioavailability of fentanyl."( Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of fentanyl sublingual spray: a single-dose 5-way crossover study.
Chavan, A; Dillaha, L; Goskonda, V; Parikh, N, 2013
)
0.86
", clearance (CL), absorption rate constant (KA), central volume (V2) and bioavailability (F1), were estimated, while other parameters were fixed to previous model estimates."( An innovative phase I population pharmacokinetic approach to investigate the pharmacokinetics of an intranasal fentanyl spray in healthy subjects.
Baumann, S; Facius, A; Hartmann, L; Nave, R; Plock, N, 2013
)
0.6
"The aim of this clinical study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and bioavailability of INFS in healthy subjects compared to oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC)."( Faster absorption and higher systemic bioavailability of intranasal fentanyl spray compared to oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy subjects.
Nave, R; Popper, L; Schmitt, H,
)
0.56
"Compared to OTFC, a much faster absorption rate was observed for INFS which was supported by the much earlier appearance of detectable fentanyl plasma levels and a shorter T(max)."( Faster absorption and higher systemic bioavailability of intranasal fentanyl spray compared to oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy subjects.
Nave, R; Popper, L; Schmitt, H,
)
0.57
"One dose of INFS gives significantly higher plasma fentanyl levels and significantly higher bioavailability than OTFC based on dose-normalized AUC."( Faster absorption and higher systemic bioavailability of intranasal fentanyl spray compared to oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy subjects.
Nave, R; Popper, L; Schmitt, H,
)
0.62
" Furthermore, the lag time and absorption rate were different between the three groups, with a significantly higher rate in the young participants versus the oldest participants."( Chronological age affects the permeation of fentanyl through human skin in vitro.
Benfeldt, E; Holmgaard, R; Nielsen, JB; Sorensen, JA, 2013
)
0.65
"We demonstrate that fentanyl permeates the skin of young individuals in greater amounts and at a higher absorption rate than in middle-aged and old individuals in vitro."( Chronological age affects the permeation of fentanyl through human skin in vitro.
Benfeldt, E; Holmgaard, R; Nielsen, JB; Sorensen, JA, 2013
)
0.97
" They were assessed in relative bioavailability in 20 healthy Chinese male volunteers according to a single dose, 2-sequence, crossover randomized design."( Bioequivalence assessment of two transdermal delivery systems of fentanyl in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Liu, J; Zhou, X, 2014
)
0.64
" We describe here an analogue of 1 with an added C-terminal β-glucosylserine residue, Ser(β-Glc)NH2, a modification that has previously been shown to improve bioavailability of opioid peptides."( Development of a bioavailable μ opioid receptor (MOPr) agonist, δ opioid receptor (DOPr) antagonist peptide that evokes antinociception without development of acute tolerance.
Anand, JP; Jutkiewicz, EM; Mosberg, HI; Porter, V; Sobczyk-Kojiro, K; Traynor, JR; Yeomans, L, 2014
)
0.4
" The aim of the present study is to assess the relative bioavailability of fentanyl from two different transdermal systems by evaluating plasma drug concentrations after single administration of Fentalgon® (test), a novel bilayer matrix type patch, and Durogesic SMAT (reference), a monolayer matrix type patch."( Pharmacokinetic study between a bilayer matrix fentalyl patch and a monolayer matrix fentanyl patch: single dose administration in healthy volunteers.
Bonizzoni, E; Caraceni, A; Centurioni, F; Farina, A; Manzoni, A; Perrone, T; Seiler, D; Zecca, E, 2015
)
0.87
" Transdermal patches provided sustained fentanyl absorption for up to 5 days, but the absorption rate was slower than the nominal dose rate and showed a high interindividual variability."( Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics in Pregnant Sheep after Intravenous and Transdermal Administration to the Ewe.
Acharya, G; Erkinaro, T; Haapala, L; Haapsamo, M; Hautajärvi, H; Heikkinen, AT; Heikkinen, EM; Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Laaksonen, S; Räsänen, J; Voipio, HM, 2015
)
2.13
", ip) indicate that the liver is the primary site of biotransformation of the compound, suggesting that both 22a and its metabolite(s) are active, compensating probably low bioavailability of the parent molecule."( Design, physico-chemical properties and biological evaluation of some new N-[(phenoxy)alkyl]- and N-{2-[2-(phenoxy)ethoxy]ethyl}aminoalkanols as anticonvulsant agents.
Bednarski, M; Gunia-Krzyżak, A; Marona, H; Nitek, W; Pękala, E; Powroźnik, B; Słoczyńska, K; Walczak, M; Waszkielewicz, AM; Żesławska, E, 2016
)
0.43
"Failure to recognize the impact of various situations described throughout this work, including the bioavailability due to loss of oral route, due to pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the various drugs, either in the context of the impaired metabolism or excretion, or in due to pharmacological interactions, conditions a serious risk of subtreatment of pain and consequent impact in terms of quality of life."( [Opioids for Cancer Pain and its Use under Particular Conditions: A Narrative Review].
Brás, M; Fragoso, M; Vieira, C, 2019
)
0.51
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" The between subject variability in clearance and subcutaneous absorption rate was relatively high, and some patients recorded high fentanyl concentrations in the context of their titration to effect."( Population pharmacokinetic model of subcutaneous fentanyl in older acute care patients.
Al-Qurain, AA; Mackenzie, L; Phillips, C; Roberts, MS; Russell, PT; Tadros, R; Upton, R; Wiese, MD; Williams, DB, 2021
)
1.08
" The study designs included 1 h of transient heat application (42 ± 2°C) at either 11 h or 18 h after TDS application to concurrently investigate the influence of heat on drug bioavailability from TDS and the feasibility of IVPT to predict the effects of heat on TDS in vivo."( Evaluation of in vitro/in vivo correlations for three fentanyl transdermal delivery systems using in vitro skin permeation testing and human pharmacokinetic studies under the influence of transient heat application.
Ghosh, P; Hammell, DC; Hassan, HE; Raney, SG; Shin, SH; Stinchcomb, AL; Yu, M, 2022
)
0.97
"Due to the poor oral bioavailability of buprenorphine, an oral formulation has not been thought possible."( A novel long-acting formulation of oral buprenorphine/naloxone produces prolonged decreases in fentanyl self-administration by rhesus monkeys.
Comer, SD; Foltin, RW; Nagaraj, N; Scranton, RE; Sykes, KA; Zale, S, 2022
)
0.94
" Loperamide is considered to have low abuse potential as it does not produce an analgesic or euphoric effect due to low bioavailability and first-pass metabolism."( An Opioid Hiding in Plain Sight: Loperamide-Induced False-Positive Fentanyl and Buprenorphine Immunoassay Results.
Badea, A; Cervinski, MA; Geno, KA; Hubbard, JA; Jannetto, P; Lynch, KL; Nerenz, RD, 2022
)
0.96
"Opioid analgesia has been shown to interfere with the bioavailability of oral P2Y12 inhibitors prompting the search for safe and effective non-opioid analgesics to treat ischaemic chest pain."( LidocAine Versus Opioids In MyocarDial infarction: the AVOID-2 randomized controlled trial.
Andrew, E; Bernard, S; Brennan, A; Dinh, D; Fernando, H; Lefkovits, J; Milne, C; Myles, PS; Nehme, Z; O'Brien, J; Peter, K; Smith, K; Stephenson, M; Stub, D; Taylor, AJ, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

Fentanyl (in post-anesthesia care unit) and paracetamol (at home) were supplementary analgesics and the dosage was also recorded. Dosing schedules should be based upon the patient's requirement for rescue dosing and duration of effective pain control.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Careful dosage of the drugs, in particular of fentanyl, and knowledge of adequate measures to treat a decrease in blood pressure if it occurs, appears to be a prerequisite for the use of this type of anaesthesia in poor risk patients."( [Anaesthesia with flunitrazepam (rohypnol) and fentanyl for geriatric patients (author's transl)].
Haldemann, G; Hossli, G; Schaer, H, 1977
)
0.77
" Fentanyl also shifted the dose-response curve of the contractile response of aorta to norepinephrine to the right."( Alpha-adrenergic blocking action of fentanyl on the isolated aorta of the rabbit.
Hatano, Y; Toda, N, 1977
)
1.44
" The dosage schedule (per 70 kg body weight) was 2 ml intramuscularly, prior to the block, and 1 ml intravenously, after the block."( Age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Innovar induced ventilatory depression during regional anesthesia.
Coombs, JH; Fairley, HB; Isenberg, MD; Mulroy, MF,
)
0.13
") dosing produced only a slight cross-tolerance to the rate-decreasing effects of anileridine and alphaprodine."( Comparing the effects of anileridine, alphaprodine and fentanyl on schedule-controlled responding by pigeons.
Leander, JD, 1978
)
0.51
"5 to 1 microgram/kg) than by increasing the dosage of thiopental."( The role of different components of balanced anaesthesia in tolerance to endotracheal intubation.
Aromaa, U; Tammisto, T, 1977
)
0.26
" The drug was found to be effective and safe for a wide range of ungulates and pachyderms and Burchell's zebra (Equus burchelli) did not react to expected dosage levels."( Immobilisation of free-ranging wild animals using a new drug.
De Vos, V, 1978
)
0.26
"Five anesthetic agents (C1744, etorphine, fentanyl, ketamine hydrochloride, and halothane) were tested to establish the dosage of a safe, effective, short-acting anesthetic for use in the sea otter."( Comparison of anesthetic agents in the sea otter.
Kocher, FH; Williams, TD, 1978
)
0.52
" Examples of EEG dependence on the kind of anesthesia, the age of the patient, and individual sensitivity to the dosage of the anesthetic agent are given."( [Pre and postoperative EEG monitoring as illustrated in various routine anesthesia methods].
Gubernatis, G; Lips, U; Pichlmayr, J, 1978
)
0.26
" We used a combination of droperidol and fentanyl as premedication in low dosage to obtain a maximal efficiency of the possibly minimal medication of intravenously injected ketamine."( [General anaesthesia with ketamine for electro-cochleography in children (author's transl)].
Innitzer, J; Schmid, E, 1977
)
0.52
" The etomidate dosage chosen more often gave an immediate satisfactory sleep."( A comparative study of etomidate and methohexital as induction agents for analgesic anesthesia.
Bastenier-Geens, J; Dubois-Primo, J; Genicot, C; Rucquoi, M, 1976
)
0.26
" Both compunds produced a parallel shift to the right of the noradrenaline cumulative dose-response curves, indicating competitive antagonism."( A study of the effects of dexclamol as the neuroleptic component in neuroleptanaesthesia.
Jaramilio, J, 1976
)
0.26
"In a comparison of digitalis tolerance in dogs anesthetized with ketamine, Innovar Vet, or pentobarbital, the dosage of ouabain needed to cause ventricular tachycardia was significantly higher, as was the LD50 of ouabain, with ketamine or Innovar than with pentobarbital."( The effects of ketamine and of Innovar anesthesia on digitalis tolerance in dogs.
El-Etr, AA; Ivankovich, AD; Janeczko, GF; Maronic, JP,
)
0.13
" A parallelism between the dosage of the substances and the intensity of the analgetic effect and the degree of changed permeability of the blood-cerebral barrier could be noted."( [Effect of promedol and fentanyl on the permeability of the hemato-encephalic barrier of rats for noradrenaline-H3].
Raevskiĭ, KS; Romanova, EA; Tolmacheva, NS,
)
0.44
" It was found that 10 mg of naloxone was sufficient to antagonize wide dosage ranges of etorphine hydrochloride or fentanyl, used in combination with a variety of tranquilizers."( An appraisal of naloxone hydrochloride as a narcotic antagonist in the capture and release of wild herbivores.
Smuts, GL, 1975
)
0.46
" Although anecdotal experience exists concerning the use of fentanyl PCA in adults, dosing guidelines in children must depend on consideration of the current narcotic regimen and the use of equipotent doses of fentanyl."( Patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl in children.
Baker, DK; Tobias, JD, 1992
)
0.8
" Responses were defined in terms of percent depression in first-twitch height and train-of-four response, and the dose-response curves were constructed after probit transformation of the responses."( Pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade during nitrous oxide-fentanyl, enflurane, isoflurane, and halothane anesthesia in surgical patients.
Abdulrazik, E; Naguib, M; Seraj, M, 1992
)
0.52
" It was confirmed that naloxone and amiphenazole in the dosage range studied do not influence spontaneous respiration in healthy adults."( [Development of continuous monitoring of spontaneous respiration in the postoperative phase. 2. Cutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide partial pressures following i.v. bolus application of fentanyl, buprenorphine, naloxone and amiphenazole in healthy adult s
Huttarsch, H; Lehmann, KA; Schroeder, B; Zech, D, 1992
)
0.47
" Trials were assessed by sample size, opioid dosage regimen, and therapeutic outcome."( Transdermal fentanyl.
Lopez, JR; Yee, LY, 1992
)
0.66
" Further investigations need to be done to establish the most appropriate dosage rates for these preparations in ostriches."( Ostrich (Struthio camelus) immobilisation using carfentanil and xylazine and reversal with yohimbine and naltrexone.
Malan, JH; Quandt, SK; Raath, JP, 1992
)
0.28
"Fentanyl is an opioid traditionally administered by infusion or injection and more recently in a rate-controlled transdermal dosage form."( System functionality and physicochemical model of fentanyl transdermal system.
Gale, R; Gupta, SK; Hwang, SS; Southam, M, 1992
)
1.98
"During cardiopulmonary-bypass (CB) procedures, anesthesiologists have traditionally based the administration of narcotics on general dosage recommendations and past experience."( Development of a real-time algorithm for predicting sufentanil plasma levels during cardiopulmonary-bypass surgery using a systems approach.
Gupte, PM; Inchiosa, MA; Liu, MZ; Sanchala, V; Silvern, DA, 1992
)
0.28
" Cumulative dosage of fentanyl was recorded, and plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured."( Use of patient-controlled analgesia to compare the efficacy of epidural to intravenous fentanyl administration.
Estok, P; Ginsberg, B; Glass, PS; Goldberg, JS; Sladen, RN, 1992
)
0.82
" The present study was designed to find the best dosage regimen for short operations and rapid changes."( [The use of propofol during diskectomy in neurosurgery].
Abbushi, W; Egbert, R; Entholzner, E; Hargasser, S; Hipp, R; Petrowicz, O; Trappe, AE, 1992
)
0.28
" catheters, dose-response curves were carried out using the hot plate (HP) test for a number of receptor-preferring opioids."( Characteristics of dose-dependent antagonism by beta-funaltrexamine of the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal mu agonists.
Mjanger, E; Yaksh, TL, 1991
)
0.28
") of a 15 mg naltrexone pellet there was a significant shift to the right of the fentanyl dose-response curves for analgesia and lethality."( Evaluation of receptor mechanism mediating fentanyl analgesia and toxicity.
Jang, Y; Yoburn, BC, 1991
)
0.77
"A multicentre trial was designed to determine the dose-response and side-effects of esmolol when administered as a single iv bolus prior to induction of anaesthesia for controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation."( Bolus administration of esmolol for controlling the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: the Canadian Multicentre Trial.
Hill, J; Martineau, RJ; Miller, DR; Wynands, JE, 1991
)
0.28
" Maximum depression of the first response (T1) in the train-of-four was measured, and dose-response curves were constructed."( Nitrous oxide potentiates vecuronium neuromuscular blockade in humans.
Balendran, P; Bevan, DR; Donati, F; Fiset, P, 1991
)
0.28
"The physicochemical properties, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, serum concentrations and clinical effects, adverse effects and contraindications, and dosage of transdermally administered fentanyl are described, and clinical studies evaluating the use of a transdermal fentanyl system in the treatment of postoperative pain and chronic cancer-associated pain are reviewed."( Transdermally administered fentanyl for pain management.
Calis, KA; Corso, DM; Kohler, DR, 1992
)
0.77
" The influence of chronic naltrexone treatment upon the antinociceptive effects of fentanyl was assessed in drug-naive (control) rats and in rats which had received fentanyl in the same dosage schedule as those in drug discrimination experiments."( Paradoxical effect of chronic fentanyl treatment on naltrexone-induced supersensitivity and upregulation.
Ableitner, A; Ayesta, FJ; Emmett-Oglesby, MW; Herz, A; Shippenberg, TS, 1992
)
0.8
" We suggest that higher doses of fentanyl combined with diazepam can reduce the dosage of vasodilator but do not prolong the time of extubation and stay in ICU."( Effects of high-dose fentanyl combined with diazepam on patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Chang, CL; Tseng, CC; Yeh, FC, 1991
)
0.88
" On the basis of our dose-response data, we suggest that, in mice, kappa and mu, but not delta, opioid receptors modulate tonic pain perception at both spinal and supraspinal loci."( Tonic pain perception in the mouse: differential modulation by three receptor-selective opioid agonists.
Cowan, A; Murray, CW, 1991
)
0.28
"Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a novel, noninvasive dosage form of fentanyl used to provide children and adults with sedation, anxiolysis, and analgesia."( Absorption and bioavailability of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Ashburn, MA; Hague, BI; Le Maire, L; Stanley, TH; Stanski, DR; Streisand, JB; Tarver, SD; Varvel, JR, 1991
)
0.87
" Dosage was titrated to individual subjective pain relief."( Prospective evaluation of epidural and intravenous administration of fentanyl for pain control and restoration of ventilatory function following multiple rib fractures.
Davis, JW; Hoyt, DB; Karagianes, TG; Mackersie, RC, 1991
)
0.52
" In nine dogs anesthetized with fentanyl and midazolam, halothane dose-response curves (0."( Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia on regional and global cardiac actions of halothane in dogs.
Hu, WC; Leone, BJ; McRae, RL; Smith, LR; Spahn, DR, 1991
)
0.56
"To determine whether nalbuphine might replace fentanyl as the principal opioid for anesthesia during coronary artery bypass surgery, 20 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization were anesthetized with flunitrazepam and with a continuous infusion of either nalbuphine (an opioid agonist-antagonist) or fentanyl (a pure opioid agonist) in equipotent dosage ratio of 333:1."( Comparison of nalbuphine and fentanyl anesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery. Hemodynamics, hormonal response, and postoperative respiratory depression.
Gattiker, RI; Schmid, ER; Weiss, BM, 1991
)
0.83
"Twenty-four patients in a paediatric intensive care unit mostly undergoing cardiac surgery, received a midazolam dosage between 50-400 micrograms/kg per hour as a continuous intravenous infusion partly in combination with fentanyl [0,5-2,5 micrograms/kg per hour] for analgesia and sedation."( Clinical experience with continuous intravenous sedation using midazolam and fentanyl in the paediatric intensive care unit.
Hartwig, S; Roth, B; Theisohn, M, 1991
)
0.69
" A dose-response study demonstrated that the maximum growth hormone release was obtained with 10 micrograms/kg while higher doses were less or not effective."( The growth hormone secretory response to fentanyl in rat: an involvement of mu type receptors.
Buydens, P; Finné, E; Govaerts, J; Matton, A; Vanhaelst, L, 1990
)
0.54
" However, propranolol significantly shifted the methacholine dose-response curve to the left so that methacholine (0."( Pulmonary reactivity to methacholine during beta-adrenergic blockade: propranolol versus esmolol.
Hirshman, CA; Sauder, RA; Tobias, JD, 1990
)
0.28
" On day 7, the magnitude of tolerance was assessed in each group by establishing intrathecal dose-response curves and ED50 values for sufentanil and morphine given as a bolus injection."( Differential cross-tolerance between intrathecal morphine and sufentanil in the rat.
Sosnowski, M; Yaksh, TL, 1990
)
0.28
" The A50 (dose producing 50% MPE) for each drug or drug combination was determined from the dose-response curve."( Antinociceptive interaction between opioids and medetomidine: systemic additivity and spinal synergy.
Bagley, J; Harris, S; Lin, BS; Lloyd, P; Messineo, E; Ossipov, MH, 1990
)
0.28
" In each patient the dosage of the drugs was adjusted to obtain the optimum responses during induction and maintenance."( [Propofol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia during heart surgery. Results of pharmacological studies in man].
Haverich, A; Kirchner, E; Lübbe, N; Schaps, D; Seitz, W, 1991
)
0.28
" Guaifenesin amplifies the effect of several anaesthetics, which complement one another, allowing the dosage to be decreased and thereby reducing the cardiovascular stress."( [Combination anesthesia in sheep with ketamine-(fentanyl)-guaifenesin (My 301)-laughing gas-halothane].
Blättchen, C; Blümel, G; Brosch, W; Erhardt, W; Roder, J; Schindele, M, 1990
)
0.53
" Two moderate respiratory depressions occurred in 1989 due to error in dosage with no consequence for the child."( [Intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in pediatric surgery. 1 years' experience].
Charles-Guillard, S; Heloury, Y; Meignier, M; Pannier, M; Ricard, P; Rogez, JM; Zaouter, M, 1990
)
0.28
" In order to define the minimal dosage of fentanyl required, the MD was titrated according to increases or decreases in the heart rate and/or mean arterial pressure exceeding 15 per cent of baseline ward values."( Anticonvulsant therapy increases fentanyl requirements during anaesthesia for craniotomy.
Modica, PA; Spitznagel, EL; Tempelhoff, R, 1990
)
0.82
" These doses were based on the assumption that the slope of the dose-response curve during nitrous oxide-opioid anaesthesia would be approximately the same as the slope of the neuromuscular response from the first human studies with mivacurium."( Neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride (BW B1090U) during nitrous oxide-fentanyl-thiopentone and nitrous oxide-halothane anaesthesia.
Abou-Donia, M; Choi, WW; From, RP; Pearson, KS; Sokoll, MD, 1990
)
0.5
" There was no significant difference between the slopes of the HAL and BAL inhalation anesthetic dose-response curves."( Neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride (BW B109OU) during nitrous oxide-narcotic, nitrous oxide-halothane and nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia in surgical patients.
Abou-Donia, M; Choi, WW; From, RP; Pearson, KS; Sokoll, MD, 1990
)
0.28
" Flumazenil (Ro 15-1788) administration caused a parallel shift to the right of the dose-response curve for midazolam spinal analgesia."( On the mechanism by which midazolam causes spinally mediated analgesia.
Edwards, M; Gent, JP; Goodchild, CS; Serrao, JM, 1990
)
0.28
" Furthermore, total drug dosage requirements were measured and compared."( [Infusion or repetitive bolus injection? A clinical study of midazolam/fentanyl and diazepam/fentanyl combination anesthesia in neurosurgical operations].
Luger, TJ; Mair, P; Morawetz, R; Mutz, N; Stroschneider, E, 1990
)
0.51
"% dosage schedule."( [Isoflurane. (Comparison with halothane and fentanyl anesthesia)].
Incze, F; Kozma, R; Vámos, Z, 1990
)
0.54
" Eleven of the patients were dosed according to the pharmacokinetics described by McClain and Hug, and ten of the patients were dosed according to the pharmacokinetics described by Scott and Stanski."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump.
Aziz, N; Scott, JC; Shafer, SL; Varvel, JR, 1990
)
0.6
" Meticulous surgical technique combined with local anesthesia and some form of intravenous sedation in minimal therapeutic dosage will provide satisfactory conditions to perform surgical arthroscopy of the knee."( Arthroscopic surgery of the knee under local anesthesia.
Bruce, R; Conahan, TJ; Kitz, DS; Torg, JS; Yacobucci, GN, 1990
)
0.28
" Dose-response curves of pancuronium were parallel in all age-groups."( Dose-response characteristics of pancuronium in neonates, infants and children.
Luosto, T; Meretoja, OA, 1990
)
0.28
" Two minutes after dosing and for 15 minutes thereafter, no changes were observed in maternal heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) or arterial blood gas values and catecholamine concentrations other than a statistically significant doubling in epi levels after epi dosing."( Effects of intravenous test dose epinephrine on fetal sheep during acute fetal stress and acidosis.
Amini, S; Cohen, I; Herman, M; Hoyt, M; Veille, JC; Youngstrom, P,
)
0.13
" Therefore, the possibility of choosing a useful dosage regimen of smaller doses of fentanyl (up to 20 micrograms/kg) leading to analgesic serum levels of greater than 3 ng/ml is investigated in this study."( [Determination of the basic data on fentanyl dosage in neuroleptanalgesia for heart surgery].
Deutrich, C; Olthoff, D; Vetter, B, 1990
)
0.78
"The induction dose-response of midazolam was compared with the dose-response of its combination with fentanyl and with that of fentanyl alone in three groups of 60 unpremedicated, ASA physical status I or II women undergoing minor gynaecological surgery."( Midazolam acts synergistically with fentanyl for induction of anaesthesia.
abd-el-Khalim, H; Ben-Shlomo, I; Ezry, J; Tverskoy, M; Zohar, S, 1990
)
0.77
" An increase in dosage would be necessary in children above 8 years old."( [Pediatric anesthesia and pharmacokinetics of propofol administered at a constant rate].
Barale, F; Clément, G; Kantelip, JP; Lassauge, F; Magnin, P; Pequegnot, C; Stimmesse, B; Succi, C; Than, TT, 1990
)
0.28
" The dosage range for atracurium given by infusion (0."( Atracurium infusion in total intravenous anesthesia.
Nilsson, A; Persson, MP; Tamsen, A, 1987
)
0.27
" The patient's cardiac insufficiency and chronic bronchitis made a balanced anesthesia with reduced dosage of rapifen and halothane necessary."( [Difficult intubation and anesthesia in Pfaundler-Hurler disease].
Falk, K; Gross, H; Zinganell, K, 1989
)
0.28
"The effect of midazolam on the induction dose-response curve for alfentanil was studied in nonpremedicated ASA physical status I or II patients."( Midazolam-alfentanil synergism for anesthetic induction in patients.
Bradley, EL; Kissin, I; Vinik, HR, 1989
)
0.28
" Prior investigators have suggested that increasing the administered dosage and volume of lumbar epidural fentanyl may increase the spread of analgesia."( Lumbar epidural fentanyl analgesia after thoracic surgery.
Cirella, VN; Delphin, ES; Melendez, JA, 1989
)
0.84
" It is concluded that administration of fentanyl in small, intermittent IV boluses, with dosing completed before the onset of CPB, produces satisfactory plasma levels, anesthesia, and hemodynamic stability in children undergoing corrective surgery for congenital cardiac defects."( Fentanyl intermittent bolus technique for anesthesia in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery.
Becker, GL; Bolam, DD; Chapin, JW; Fleming, WF; Hurlbert, BJ; Kennedy, EM; Leuschen, P; Newland, JR; Newland, MC; Sarafian, LB, 1989
)
1.99
"The dose-response relationships of mivacurium chloride during N2O/fentanyl or N2O/enflurane anesthesia were compared in 70 patients intraoperatively."( The dose-response relationship of mivacurium chloride in humans during nitrous oxide-fentanyl or nitrous oxide-enflurane anesthesia.
Caldwell, JE; Fahey, MR; Heier, T; Kitts, JB; Lynam, DP; Miller, RD, 1989
)
0.74
" When the C1 antibody was combined with an iodinated analog to fentanyl, good detectability of alpha-methylfentanyl and 3-methylfentanyl, in terms of fentanyl equivalents, was obtained from urine samples of dosed mares."( Pharmacologic effects and detection methods of methylated analogs of fentanyl in horses.
Blake, JW; Tai, CL; Tai, HH; Tobin, T; Weckman, TJ; Woods, WE, 1989
)
0.75
" dose-response curves for the effect of the chronic drug given as a bolus."( Potency of infused spinal antinociceptive agents is inversely related to magnitude of tolerance after continuous infusion.
Stevens, CW; Yaksh, TL, 1989
)
0.28
" The AUC0-120 min after intranasal dosing was 78 per cent of that after intravenous injection."( Comparison of intravenous and intranasal sufentanil absorption and sedation.
Helmers, JH; Noorduin, H; Van Leeuwen, L; Van Peer, A; Zuurmond, WW, 1989
)
0.28
" In the patients in the groups II and III the hydrocortisone in the blood, taken 1 minute before induction and 3 minutes after intubation was dosed radioimmunologically."( [Hemodynamic reaction in the ultrarapid induction and protection realized with fentanyl].
Acalovschi, I; Fleşeru, M; Szabo, P; Szilagy, E,
)
0.36
" The dosage scheme used in this study, which consisted of a sufentanil bolus followed by a continuous infusion, prevented plasma concentrations of sufentanil from declining in both groups during the entire study period."( [The effect of sufentanil in high doses on hemodynamics and electroencephalography activity in coronary patients].
Lange, H; Lüpke, K; Sonntag, H; Stephan, H, 1989
)
0.28
"The dose-response of pipecuronium bromide, the time course of its neuromuscular blocking effects, and the reversibility of the residual block by neostigmine and edrophonium have been investigated in patients undergoing various types of anesthesia."( Dose-response relation and time course of action of pipecuronium bromide in humans anesthetized with nitrous oxide and isoflurane, halothane, or droperidol and fentanyl.
Agoston, S; Richardson, FJ; Wierda, JM, 1989
)
0.47
" Dosage requirements for anesthetic agents are shown."( Fentanyl-midazolam-flumazenil anesthesia for induced abortion.
Garamvölgyi, G; Hamar, O; Kálmán, A, 1989
)
1.72
"kg-1 to study the dose-response relationships, as well as the cardiovascular effects of mivacurium."( Neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride in surgical patients receiving nitrous oxide-narcotic or nitrous oxide-isoflurane anaesthesia.
Abou-Donia, M; Choi, WW; Forbes, RB; Gergis, SD; Kirchner, J; Mehta, MP; Murray, DJ; Sokoll, MD, 1989
)
0.28
" Experiments 3 and 4 provide data to demonstrate (a) that a positive CPP can be established in our chambers using injections of morphine, (b) that a regimen of dosing with unequal numbers of days of putative and alternate conditioning is a reliable and conservative test of the opioid's ability to establish a CPP, and (c) that although the activity of rats decreases across a session, the general activity of rats before and after conditioning procedures is the same."( Measuring morphine's capacity to establish a place preference.
Hubbell, CL; Marglin, SH; Mattie, ME; Reid, LD, 1989
)
0.28
"In a two-part study, the dose-response relationships of doxacurium chloride (BW A938U) were evaluated during general anesthesia maintained with commonly used anesthetic techniques."( Dose-response relationships of doxacurium chloride in humans during anesthesia with nitrous oxide and fentanyl, enflurane, isoflurane, or halothane.
Dunn, K; Fragen, RJ; Katz, JA; McNulty, B; Rudd, GD; Shanks, CA, 1989
)
0.49
" Dose-response curves were constructed evaluating the relationship between the duration of balloon inflation versus the percentage of animals with a sustained neurologic deficit."( Halothane, fentanyl/nitrous oxide, and spinal lidocaine protect against spinal cord injury in the rat.
Cole, DJ; Drummond, JC; Shapiro, HM; Zivin, JA, 1989
)
0.67
" To maximize safety, we recommend careful dosing and titration, close patient monitoring, and the availability of naloxone hydrochloride and resuscitation equipment."( The safety of fentanyl use in the emergency department.
Borron, SW; Chudnofsky, CR; Dronen, SC; Wright, MB; Wright, SW, 1989
)
0.64
" The purpose of this prospective investigation was to determine whether a safe but adequate intrapartum dosing schedule is possible."( Fentanyl citrate analgesia during labor.
Chleborad, J; Leuschen, MP; Rathke, A; Rayburn, W; Weidner, W, 1989
)
1.72
"Single dose-response curves were determined for suxamethonium in neonates, infants and children during thiopentone-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anaesthesia."( Dose-response curves for suxamethonium in neonates, infants and children.
Baker, RD; McKiernan, EP; Meakin, G; Morris, P, 1989
)
0.49
" A dose-response relationship for the effect on the arterial capacitance could not be demonstrated."( Effect of N2O on segmental left ventricular function and effective arterial elastance in pigs when added to a halothane-fentanyl-pancuronium anesthetic technique.
Badenhorst, E; Bolliger, C; Coetzee, A; Fourie, P; Lombard, C; Rebel, A, 1989
)
0.49
" Dose-response curves describing the relationship between the duration of balloon inflation and the percentage of animals with a persistent neurologic deficit were constructed and compared for differences by use of a group t test."( The effect of fentanyl anesthesia and intrathecal naloxone on neurologic outcome following spinal cord injury in the rat.
Brauer, FS; Cole, DJ; Drummond, JC; Hertzog, RE; Shapiro, HM, 1989
)
0.64
" This required a higher dosage of fentanyl in VR + CABG cases."( [Anesthesia in patients undergoing valvular replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting].
Hayami, A; Horibe, M; Imura, I; Mochizuki, T; Tsuchiya, T; Wada, S; Yamanoue, T, 1989
)
0.56
" Using the described intravenous dosing schedule, fentanyl was preferable to meperidine during labor because there was no prolonged maternal sedation or vomiting necessitating therapy and the requirement for neonatal naloxone was reduced."( Randomized comparison of meperidine and fentanyl during labor.
Parriott, JE; Rayburn, WF; Smith, CV; Woods, RE, 1989
)
0.8
" The dose-response curves were shifted to the right in a non-parallel fashion with increasing calcium concentration (0."( Comparison of the effects of calcium concentration on mu and kappa agonist actions in the guinea pig ileum.
Hill, RG; Hughes, J; Johnson, MA, 1986
)
0.27
" Phenylephrine (Phe) pressor dose-response curves were established prior to anesthesia, during fentanyl anesthesia, and during fentanyl anesthesia plus hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass at the time of aortic cross-clamp (anes + CPB/AXC)."( alpha 1-Adrenergic responsiveness during coronary artery bypass surgery: effect of preoperative ejection fraction.
Hawkins, ED; Kates, RA; McIntyre, RW; Reves, JG; Schwinn, DA, 1988
)
0.49
" However, the dose-response curve for naltrexone was not parallel to the morphine or fentanyl dose-response curves."( An analysis of naltrexone and naloxone's possible agonistic actions in the dog.
Martin, WR; Wettstein, JG, 1985
)
0.49
" The dose-response curves were monotonic and the slopes were log-linear."( Epidural injections of bupivacaine, morphine, fentanyl, lofentanil, and DADL in chronically implanted rats: a pharmacologic and pathologic study.
Durant, PA; Yaksh, TL, 1986
)
0.53
" The slopes of the monotonic dose-response curves for the five opioids did not differ significantly."( Studies of the pharmacology and pathology of intrathecally administered 4-anilinopiperidine analogues and morphine in the rat and cat.
Durant, PA; Noueihed, RY; Yaksh, TL, 1986
)
0.27
" After SUF dosing in dogs, N-[4-(methoxymethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenylpropanamide was more abundant than M5."( Excretion and biotransformation of alfentanil and sufentanil in rats and dogs.
Hendrickx, J; Heykants, J; Hurkmans, R; Lauwers, W; Meuldermans, W; Swysen, E; Thijssen, J; Timmerman, P; Woestenborghs, R,
)
0.13
" Thus, the dose-response curves for fentanyl and sufentanil were shifted to the left and the ED50 of the analgesics lowered in droperidol pre-treated animals."( Droperidol enhances fentanyl and sufentanil, but not morphine, analgesia.
Bansinath, M; Lovitz, M; Puig, MM; Statile, L; Turndorf, H; Warner, W, 1988
)
0.87
"Alfentanil in low dosage (8 micrograms kg-1) as an analgesic agent for short duration surgery was evaluated."( Alfentanil for short duration laparoscopic procedures.
Lee, KS; Purcell, GJ; Rae, BR; White, B, 1986
)
0.27
" We conclude that sufentanil administered in the dosage range of 19 micrograms/kg allows more rapid induction, earlier emergence from anesthesia, and faster extubation of patients than either morphine or fentanyl."( A comparison of morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil anesthesia for cardiac surgery: induction, emergence, and extubation.
Dec-Silver, H; Harrison, WK; Sanford, TJ; Smith, NT, 1986
)
0.76
" The low- and high-dose nalbuphine groups clinically resembled the fentanyl group in terms of dosing frequency and patients' self-ratings of postoperative analgesia."( A comparison of clinical and psychological effects of fentanyl and nalbuphine in ambulatory gynecologic patients.
Earls, F; Garfield, FB; Garfield, JM; Philip, BK; Roaf, E, 1987
)
0.76
" It may be assumed, that with partial agonists the relation of agonistic and antagonistic activity may be different, depending on the dosage used and on the respective pharmacologic effect observed during investigation."( [Intra- and postoperative interactions between the 2 opioids fentanyl and buprenorphine].
Börner, U; Gerlach, H; Gips, H; Hempelmann, G; Müller, H; Richter, M, 1986
)
0.51
"Systemic administration of beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) 24 hr before analgesic testing produced approximately a 10-fold parallel shift in the dose-response curves of the prototypic mu agonists morphine, I-methadone, fentanyl and etorphine in the mouse abdominal constriction test."( Use of beta-funaltrexamine to determine mu opioid receptor involvement in the analgesic activity of various opioid ligands.
Hynes, MD; Leander, JD; Reel, JK; Zimmerman, DM, 1987
)
0.46
"Five different dosage schemes for alfentanil administration supplemented with thiopentone, pancuronium and N2O/O2 have been studied in 25 patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy."( Alfentanil anaesthesia in gall-bladder surgery.
Hole, A; Raeder, JC, 1986
)
0.27
" The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic components of each patient's dose-response relationship were evaluated simultaneously."( Decreased fentanyl and alfentanil dose requirements with age. A simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation.
Scott, JC; Stanski, DR, 1987
)
0.68
" A tentative dosage range has been established."( Butorphanol improves CO2 response and ventilation after fentanyl anesthesia.
Bjurstrom, RL; Bowdle, TA; Greichen, SL; Schoene, RB, 1987
)
0.52
"The efficacy of two dosage regimens of intravenous naloxone were compared to avoid nonrespiratory side effects and respiratory depression and yet to preserve analgesia (maximum tolerance to periostial pressure over the tibia) after administration of 200 micrograms epidural fentanyl."( Effect of naloxone infusion on analgesia and respiratory depression after epidural fentanyl.
Benhamou, D; Carli, P; Ecoffey, Cl; Gross, JB; Gueneron, JP, 1988
)
0.68
" Using these population pharmacokinetic parameters, one can predict (estimate) the plasma concentration time course of alfentanil for any given dosage scheme."( Evaluating the accuracy of using population pharmacokinetic data to predict plasma concentrations of alfentanil.
Ausems, ME; Maitre, PO; Stanski, DR; Vozeh, S, 1988
)
0.27
"Three different dosage regimens of alfentanil were compared with boluses of fentanyl in 80 patients who underwent a variety of surgical procedures."( Alfentanil infusions. Comparison of bolus administration of fentanyl with three alfentanil infusion regimens.
Sleigh, JW; Stuart-Taylor, ME, 1987
)
0.74
" The empirical method of adjusting dosage to clinical response, as currently applied to inhalational anaesthesia, proved to be a useful experimental method of defining dosage schemes before adequate knowledge of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variables of alfentanil was available."( The development of alfentanil infusions for cardiac anaesthesia.
de Lange, S, 1987
)
0.27
" The following dosage scheme is proposed: a loading dose of 100 micrograms kg-1, given either in one or two doses, or as a fast infusion administered over 10 min, followed by a maintenance infusion at a rate of 1 microgram kg-1 min-1."( Practical aspects of alfentanil infusion.
Geerts, P; Heykants, J; Noorduin, H; Vanden Bussche, G, 1987
)
0.27
" We conclude that: (1) a more flexible dosage schedule is required in order to prevent disturbing movement of the patient during the procedure and (2) patients who received alfentanil were not street-worthy earlier than those who were given fentanyl."( Double blind comparison of alfentanil N2O and fentanyl N2O for outpatient surgical procedures.
Enright, AB; Parker, JB, 1988
)
0.72
" For most patients, using population pharmacokinetic parameters of alfentanil for dosing regimen allows accurate prediction of the plasma concentration of the drug over time."( Bayesian forecasting improves the prediction of intraoperative plasma concentrations of alfentanil.
Maitre, PO; Stanski, DR, 1988
)
0.27
" The dosage of alfentanil required was comparable in both Asian and European patients, but recovery was slower in the Asian patients."( A comparison of alfentanil requirements in European and Asian patients during general anaesthesia.
Aun, C; Carley, RH; Chan, K; Houghton, IT; Lams, YM; Salmon, NP; Thornton, JA, 1988
)
0.27
"We were interested in determining the dose-response relationship of atracurium in children (2-10 yr) during nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia (1%) and the atracurium infusion rate required to maintain about 95% neuromuscular blockade during nitrous oxide-halothane (0."( Atracurium infusion requirements in children during halothane, isoflurane, and narcotic anesthesia.
Brandom, BW; Cook, DR; Fehr, B; Lineberry, CG; Rudd, GD; Woelfel, SK, 1985
)
0.27
" Dosage above 50 micrograms did not seem to improve the quality or duration of pain relief, although the onset of action was faster with 75 micrograms."( Epidural sufentanil for postoperative pain relief.
Donadoni, R; Noorduin, H; Rolly, G; Vanden Bussche, G, 1985
)
0.27
"A rabbit tooth pulp antinociceptive model was used to investigate the effect of prior administration of diazepam or muscimol on the potency and duration of fentanyl and meperidine Potency experiments compared ED(50) values in all-or-none dose-response assays between both muscimol (0."( Diazepam enhances fentanyl and diminishes meperidine antinociception.
Bergman, SA; Williams, G; Wyn, RL,
)
0.66
" We argue for the continued use of trichloroethylene by this technique, because it costs one hundred times less than enflurane and because of the potential morbidity of the postoperative opiate dosage required after enflurane."( Comparison of trichloroethylene and enflurane as adjuncts to nitrous oxide and relaxant anaesthesia.
Reynolds, F; Rice, AS, 1987
)
0.27
" We conclude that lidocaine, when administered as an adjunct to fentanyl in the dosage used in this study, can cause cardiovascular depression, and is of minimal benefit in preventing hemodynamic abnormalities after sternotomy during coronary artery bypass graft surgery."( Evaluation of lidocaine as an adjunct to fentanyl anesthesia for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Kasten, GW; Owens, E, 1986
)
0.78
" Spontaneous ventilation is possible with the lesser dosage of fentanyl."( [Anesthesia with perfused methohexital-fentanyl combination].
Alegria, D; Ancelin, P; Bourdé, MC; Chauvin, G; Texereau, P,
)
0.64
" The dosage of a drug given in a continuous infusion is based upon knowledge of its clearance and of the function of concentration and effect."( [Continuous Midazolam infusion for sedation of respirator patients].
Asskali, F; Behne, M; Förster, H; Steuer, A, 1987
)
0.27
"During opiate anesthesia (standardized dosage of fentanyl) for operation of cerebral aneurysms after subarachnoid hemorrhage, different hemodynamic, respiratory, metabolic, and endocrine parameters were determined before (1 in Fig."( [Effect of the calcium antagonist nimodipine on hemodynamics, gas exchange and endocrine parameters in opiate anesthesia].
Adams, HA; Börner, U; Gips, H; Hempelmann, G; Marck, P; Müller, H; Otto, O, 1987
)
0.53
"The effect of high dosage fentanyl anaesthesia on P50 was studied in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery."( The effect of high-dose fentanyl anaesthesia on P50 in man.
Damen, J; Maas, A; Sinclair, D; Sprokholt, R, 1985
)
0.88
"Alfentanil in combination with etomidate and N2O/O2 was given to 50 patients as single dosage (0."( [Alfentanil in routine clinical use. A study of 50 patients].
Löffler, B, 1985
)
0.27
" The dosage of etomidate and methohexitone was lowe than that reported in the literature."( [Etomidate versus methohexital for intravenous anesthesia with alfentanyl and nitrous oxide-oxygen. A double-blind study of circulatory behavior and postoperative course].
Papst-Baierl, D; Sold, M; Weis, KH, 1985
)
0.51
" bolus dose of 50 micrograms kg-1 alfentanil were studied during surgical anaesthesia in 10 elderly patients and compared with those of the same dosage in nine young adults."( Alfentanil used in the aged: a clinical comparison with its use in young patients.
Helmers, JH; Noorduin, H; van Leeuwen, L, 1985
)
0.27
" The N-methyl-quaternary analog of naloxone (methylnaloxone, which presumably entails selective action at opiate receptors outside the CNS) was also effective, indicating peripheral effects at the dosage level used (0."( Colonic motor responses in the pony: relevance of colonic stimulation by opiate antagonists.
Bardon, T; Roger, T; Ruckebusch, Y, 1985
)
0.27
" The dosage rates of the immobilization combinations for mammmals, birds and reptiles are presented in tabular form."( [Practical advice concerning the immobilization of wild and zoo animals].
von Hegel, G; Wiesner, H, 1985
)
0.27
"The effect of prior administration of reserpine on fentanyl dose-response curves for loss of the righting reflex and prevention of purposeful movement response to noxious stimulation was studied in rats."( Reserpine-induced changes in anesthetic action of fentanyl.
Brown, PT; Kissin, I, 1985
)
0.77
"The derived pharmacokinetic data for the intravenous administration of fentanyl obtained from seven previous studies were compared using computer simulation of predicted plasma concentrations following three intravenous dosage regimens."( Variability of fentanyl pharmacokinetics in man. Computer predicted plasma concentrations for three intravenous dosage regimens.
Reilly, CS; Wood, AJ; Wood, M, 1985
)
0.86
" Examination of the effect on expired CO2 concentration at 4 minutes reveals a highly significant dose-response relationship with the three doses of Alfentanyl."( Human volunteer studies of Alfentanyl (R39209), a new short-acting narcotic analgesic.
Kay, B; Pleuvry, B, 1980
)
0.75
" Urine was collected from a horse dosed with 70 mg of [3H]fentanyl, and the primary metabolite, a water-soluble, amphoteric compound, was isolated by high-pressure liquid chromatography and identified by spectroscopic analysis."( The major metabolite of fentanyl in the horse.
Frincke, JM; Henderson, GL,
)
0.68
" Alfentanil dosage should therefore be reduced in elderly patients when large single doses, multiple doses, or long-term infusions are required."( Alfentanil kinetics in the elderly.
Helmers, H; Heykants, J; Noorduin, H; Van Peer, A; Woestenborghs, R, 1984
)
0.27
" Because of the narrow range for safe dosage for Fentaz the use of Rompun for immobilizing deer is recommended."( The effect of immobilizing drugs on adrenal responsiveness to ACTH in Rusa deer.
Stelmasiak, T; Van Mourik, S, 1984
)
0.27
" A sigmoidal dose-response curve was described."( The decrease of the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration produced by sufentanil in rats.
DiFazio, CA; Engle, JS; Hecker, BR; Lake, CL; Moscicki, JC, 1983
)
0.27
"The combination of fentanyl and droperidol, Innovar, was compared to flunitrazepam (1-2 mg) in a higher dosage (2."( [High-dose thalamonal-rohypnol for premedication. A randomized double-blind study].
Schmidt, R; Tolksdorf, W; Wagener, M, 1984
)
0.6
" This effect is not enhanced by increasing the dosage of droperidol."( [Double-blind randomized clinical study of a droperidol-fentanyl combination].
Bertrand, AM; Bertrand, JC; Conil, JM; Guerot, A, 1984
)
0.51
" The endexpiratory percentage CO2-concentration and the expiratory percentage O2-concentration were determined under anesthesia by means of adequate dosage of anesthetics in two groups (group I: 16 women aged between 16 and 54; group II: 10 women aged between 60 and 75)."( [Radenarcon/fentanyl short anesthesias in small gynecologic interventions].
Beutner, M; Fiedler, C; Siegismund, K, 1983
)
0.64
"In this study we attempted to define the minimal dosage of alfentanil (AF) needed in combination with nitrous oxide to provide satisfactory anesthetic conditions for lower abdominal gynecologic surgery."( Variable rate infusion of alfentanil as a supplement to nitrous oxide anesthesia for general surgery.
Ausems, ME; de Lange, S; Hug, CC, 1983
)
0.27
" min-1) significantly decreases the drug dosage requirement, improves intraoperative conditions, and decreases recovery time compared with the traditional intermittent bolus technique."( Use of continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus administration of fentanyl or ketamine during outpatient anesthesia.
White, PF, 1983
)
0.5
" It is important, therefore, to know whether or not the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl vary with dose size in order to predict the plasma concentrations and effects produced by various dosage regiments."( Dose-independent pharmacokinetics of fentanyl.
Hug, CC; McClain, DA; Murphy, MR, 1983
)
0.77
" Maintenance dosage of 200 micrograms/kg/minute provided good operating conditions and rapid uncomplicated recovery in spontaneously breathing patients, while 150 micrograms/kg/minute proved inadequate to prevent patient movement."( Disoprofol and fentanyl for total intravenous anaesthesia.
Major, E; Verniquet, AJ; Waddell, TK; Yate, PM, 1982
)
0.62
" This potentiation of the fentanyl response peaked at between 0 and 4 hours after dosing and was gone by 72 hours after caffeine dosing."( Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and behavioral effects of caffeine in horses.
Greene, EW; Tobin, T; Woods, WE, 1983
)
0.57
" This work was performed in order to evaluate the dose-response relationship, time course, and naloxone reversibility of fentanyl suppression of neurons that are involved with the transmission of information about pain."( Dose-response suppression of noxiously evoked activity of WDR neurons by spinally administered fentanyl.
Collins, JG; Kitahata, LM; Matsumoto, M; Suzukawa, M; Yuge, O, 1983
)
0.69
" As a conclusion, it is suggested that altered sensitivity of brain tissue rather than changes in bioavailability must explain variations in dose-response relationship which are frequently believed to be seen when fentanyl is used in patients with chronic drug administration."( [Biotransformation of fentanyl. III. Effect of chronic drug exposure on the distribution, metabolism and excretion in the rat].
Brandt, K; Daub, D; Hunger, L; Lehmann, KA, 1983
)
0.77
"Experiments on rabbits showed the summation of analgesia induced by electric stimulation of biologically active points (BAP) and by administration of morphine and fentanil within a certain dosage range."( [Action of morphine and fentanyl during the electrostimulation of biologically active points].
Iasnetsov, VV; Komendantova, MV; Zorian, EV,
)
0.44
" Dosage rules based on pharmacokinetic principles, for repeated administration and infusion are outlined for the induction, maintenance and termination of anaesthesia."( [Principles of clinical pharmacokinetics in anaesthesiology (author's transl)].
Lauven, PM; Schüttler, J; Schwilden, H; Stoeckel, H, 1982
)
0.26
" Other experiments involving intracisternal dosing with this long acting form at higher levels (0."( Effects of enkephalins versus opiates on locomotor activity of the horse.
Burns, P; Combie, JD; Nugent, TE; Tobin, T; Weld, JM, 1982
)
0.26
" Fentanyl should not be used at such high dosage and should probably not be preferred to morphine, considering that the duration of analgesia is short, that the analgesic score is identical to that obtained with lower doses or with longer lasting narcotics, that it does not prevent passive mobilization pains and that it entails a definite risk of respiratory depression."( [Peridural analgesia with high doses of fentanyl: failure of the method for early postoperative kinesitherapy in knee surgery].
Blaise, M; Cupa, M; Dupuy, A; Hugon, S; Pierrot, M, 1982
)
1.44
" It is suggested that individual dosing of fentanyl rather than continuous infusion should be preferred in routine neuroleptanalgesia."( ["Analgesic" fentanyl blood concentrations during neuroleptanalgesia].
Daub, D; Gensior, J; Lehmann, KA, 1982
)
0.9
" The use of the newly developed piperidine derivative R 33799 at weight treated dosage levels can be strongly recommended for the immobilisation of hartebeest."( On the immobilization of hartebeest and kob in Upper Volta.
Dräger, N; Küpper, W; Mehlitz, D; Zillmann, U, 1981
)
0.26
" Dosage is limited by a reduction in respiratory rate, and by a series of electronic fail-safe circuits."( Control of postoperative pain by interactive demand analgesia.
Hull, CJ; Sibbald, A, 1981
)
0.26
" The second model described more precisely the disposition of fentanyl, although a tendency to overestimate dosing requirement remained."( Steady-state plasma fentanyl in the rabbit.
Hewson, JR; Horsewood, P; Rigg, JR; Wong, TY, 1981
)
0.83
" Reports of high intrabiliary pressures and bizarre cholangiograms for patients under such anesthesia led us to investigate the specific effects on intrabiliary pressure of morphine sulfate, fentanyl and butorphanol tartrate, each at two different dosage levels."( Effects of butorphanol, fentanyl and morphine on the intrabiliary pressure of guinea pigs.
Aldrete, JA; Franatovic, Y; Romo-Salas, F, 1980
)
0.76
" In this prospective, randomized study in 66 patients after lateral thoracotomy we evaluated whether, for equal fentanyl dosage in micrograms per kilogram, epidural infusion (lumbar catheter) of fentanyl 5 micrograms/mL provided better segmental analgesia (including the rostral portion of the incision) than a 10-micrograms/mL concentration infused at a rate half that used in the 5-micrograms/mL group."( Analgesia after thoracotomy: effects of epidural fentanyl concentration/infusion rate.
Becker, DR; de Castro, MA; Ferguson, JA; Messick, JM; Murray, MJ; Offord, KP; Pairolero, PC; Schulte, NK; Thomson, CA; Trastek, VF, 1995
)
0.76
" Dose-response curves of NOS activity versus anesthetic concentration were constructed."( Selective anesthetic inhibition of brain nitric oxide synthase.
Breslow, MJ; Martin, LD; Tobin, JR; Traystman, RJ, 1994
)
0.29
" TTS fentanyl dosing schedules should be based upon the patient's requirement for rescue dosing and duration of effective pain control."( Guidelines for the clinical use of transdermal fentanyl.
Chandler, S; Einhaus, M; Payne, R, 1995
)
1.06
" It is available for intravenous injection, as a transdermal patch and a lozenge dosage form."( Fentanyl: a review for clinical and analytical toxicologists.
Poklis, A, 1995
)
1.73
" Ketamine-fentanyl-propofol combination at a dosage of 30-0."( Comparison of anesthesia induced by ketamine-fentanyl combination and maintained by propofol or etomidate in New Zealand white rabbits.
Griffith, JW; Lang, CM; Luo, Y; Russell, GB, 1995
)
0.95
" Administration of U50,488H (3 mg/kg), in conjunction with several doses of cocaine, did not shift the cocaine dose-response curve."( Assessment of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in the rat: lack of interaction with opioids.
Broadbent, J; Dworkin, SI; Gaspard, TM,
)
0.13
" The aim of this study was to verify whether this action resulted from a local anaesthetic effect of pethidine or from inadequate fentanyl dosage in previous studies."( The effects of pethidine, fentanyl and lignocaine on postanaesthetic shivering.
Alfonsi, P; Chauvin, M; Hongnat, JM; Lebrault, C, 1995
)
0.8
" Morphine, pethidine and fentanyl, which showed a biphasic dose-response relationship with respect to seizure modulation, abolished the anticonvulsant activity of propofol to exhibit their own intrinsic activity in proconvulsant doses."( Interactions between opioid drugs and propofol in laboratory models of seizures.
Ahmad, I; Pleuvry, BJ, 1995
)
0.59
" This synergism varies considerably according to the different drugs, the different endpoints of anaesthesia and the differently combined dosage of both agents."( [The art of reasonable combining drugs in anesthesia].
Glass, PS, 1994
)
0.29
" However, the effect of differences in dosing protocol on tolerance to opioid analgesics of high or low efficacy has not been addressed."( The effect of intrinsic efficacy on opioid tolerance.
Duttaroy, A; Yoburn, BC, 1995
)
0.29
" At the end of treatment, the pumps and placebos were removed, and 4-24 h later, mice were tested in dose-response studies (tail flick) using the same drug that had been chronically administered."( The effect of intrinsic efficacy on opioid tolerance.
Duttaroy, A; Yoburn, BC, 1995
)
0.29
" The effect of fentanyl dosage upon the percentage of arousal responses that were wakeful responses to command was determined by using a Mann-Whitney test to compare a group of patients receiving fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg or less, with a group receiving fentanyl 4 micrograms/kg."( Brief wakeful response to command indicates wakefulness with suppression of memory formation during surgical anesthesia.
Dutton, RC; Smith, NT; Smith, WD, 1995
)
0.64
" Although it was possible that the clinical findings in these horses may have resulted from use of an inadequate dosage of carfentanil or xylazine, or both, analysis of the results more likely indicated that domestic and exotic horses may respond differently to carfentanil, and domestic horses may not be a good model for use in studies of carfentanil."( Complications with the use of carfentanil citrate and xylazine hydrochloride to immobilize domestic horses.
Carpenter, JW; Leith, DE; Shaw, ML, 1995
)
0.29
"4 mg/kg) and maintained with fentanyl (total dosage 70-100 micrograms/kg)."( [Anesthesia for heart transplantation in newborn and suckling infants. Special aspects of the hypoplastic left heart syndrome].
Bauer, J; Boldt, J; Dapper, F; Hempelmann, G; Knothe, C; Zickmann, B, 1995
)
0.58
" To evaluate its use in humans, urines were collected from 57 normal individuals, 48 patients seen in the Emergency Department, and 18 surgical patients receiving either low (50 micrograms) or moderate fentanyl dosage (200 and 250 micrograms) for routine anesthesia."( An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for urinary screening of fentanyl citrate abuse.
Eisma, R; Makowski, GS; Moore, RE; Onoroski, M; Ostheimer, D; Richter, JJ; Wu, AH,
)
0.56
"Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a novel lozenge dosage form of fentanyl used for premedication."( Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate premedication in patients undergoing outpatient dermatologic procedures.
Bezzant, JL; Gerwels, JW; Le Maire, L; Pauley, LF; Streisand, JB, 1994
)
0.96
"The study compared the safety and efficacy of 400-vs 800-micrograms dosage forms for their sedative and anxiolytic effects in adults undergoing a variety of dermatologic outpatient surgical procedures."( Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate premedication in patients undergoing outpatient dermatologic procedures.
Bezzant, JL; Gerwels, JW; Le Maire, L; Pauley, LF; Streisand, JB, 1994
)
0.62
"Significant sedation and anxiolysis developed in both dosage groups."( Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate premedication in patients undergoing outpatient dermatologic procedures.
Bezzant, JL; Gerwels, JW; Le Maire, L; Pauley, LF; Streisand, JB, 1994
)
0.62
"Prosidol, a new Russian narcotic analgesic, was used in various dosage forms (buccal and oral tablets, injection solution) in 113 cancer patients for the treatment of chronic pain, as a component of total anesthesia, and for postoperative analgesia."( [First experience in the use of a new Russian narcotic analgesic prosidol in oncology].
Beresnev, VA; Loseva, NA; Novikov, GA; Osipova, NA; Prokhorov, BM; Smolina, TA; Vetsheva, MS; Zemskaia, SIu,
)
0.13
"This study was designed to evaluate the dose-response effects of different doses of clonidine on the stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation."( Dose-response effects of intravenous clonidine on stress response during induction of anesthesia in coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Kulka, PJ; Tryba, M; Zenz, M, 1995
)
0.29
" Mice were injected intracerebroventricularly (ICV), or intrathecally (IT), or IT and ICV with PTX, and dose-response studies of the antinociceptive action of systemic (SC) morphine, fentanyl, and etorphine were conducted 10 days later."( Spinal and supraspinal effects of pertussis toxin on opioid analgesia.
Davis, T; Duttaroy, A; Shah, S; Yoburn, BC, 1994
)
0.48
" The combination of an opioid with DMED might reduce the dosage requirements for each drug and thereby allow the same anesthetic depth to be achieved with lesser degrees of their individual side effects."( Anesthetic and hemodynamic interactions of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl in dogs.
Hug, CC; Salmenperä, MT; Szlam, F, 1994
)
0.53
"We determined the possible benefits of a new opioid, trefentanil, relative to fentanyl and alfentanil using high-resolution pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and computer simulations of clinical dosing scenarios."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development: application to the investigational opioid trefentanil.
Dyck, JB; Lemmens, HJ; Shafer, SL; Stanski, DR, 1994
)
0.52
" Finally, we used computer simulations to predict offset of opioid effects of trefentanil, fentanyl, and alfentanil when given in different dosing schemes."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development: application to the investigational opioid trefentanil.
Dyck, JB; Lemmens, HJ; Shafer, SL; Stanski, DR, 1994
)
0.51
"We suggest that high-resolution pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies and computer simulations of clinical dosing scenarios may have significant usefulness in appreciating differences between new and established drugs in early phase I studies."( Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling in drug development: application to the investigational opioid trefentanil.
Dyck, JB; Lemmens, HJ; Shafer, SL; Stanski, DR, 1994
)
0.29
" Uterine contraction patterns for the first hour after dosing were unchanged, and the duration of the first and second stages of labor were not different between the two groups."( Double-blind comparison of intravenous butorphanol (Stadol) and fentanyl (Sublimaze) for analgesia during labor.
Atkinson, BD; Christensen, HD; Rayburn, WF; Truitt, LJ; Turnbull, GL; Wlodaver, A, 1994
)
0.53
" We investigated the role of each of these primary pharmacokinetic parameters to determine values of each that would contribute to rapid recovery after various dosing schemes."( Pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to recovery from opioids.
Shafer, SL; Youngs, EJ, 1994
)
0.29
" The prescribed and administered mean dosages were less than the minimum recommended dosage for morphine."( Postoperative pain management in preverbal children: the prescription and administration of analgesics with and without caudal analgesia.
Altimier, L; Dick, MJ; Holditch-Davis, D; Lawless, S; Norwood, S, 1994
)
0.29
" The dose-response relationship and duration of analgesic action of epidural fentanyl citrate (FC) and fentanyl pamoate (FP) were studied in white male Sprague-Dawley rats."( Prolonged analgesia after epidural injection of a poorly soluble salt of fentanyl.
Flanagan, DR; Hrdy, J; Ostman, PL; Perng, CY; Randell, TT, 1994
)
0.75
" This study evaluated the dose-response effects of intrathecal fentanyl in an elderly patient population undergoing lower extremity revascularization procedures."( An intrathecal fentanyl dose-response study in lower extremity revascularization procedures.
Dunn, SM; Duprat, KM; O'Sullivan, P; Reuben, SS, 1994
)
0.88
"With the dosage regimen used in this study, an initial epidural bolus with continuous infusion technique generates a steady state plasma concentration of alfentanil that is below levels associated with direct respiratory depression."( Plasma concentration profile of epidural alfentanil. Bolus followed by continuous infusion technique in the parturient: effect of epidural alfentanil and fentanyl on fetal heart rate.
Blass, NH; Christmas, JT; Moore, CH; Wilhite, AO,
)
0.33
" There were significant correlations between fentanyl dosage and NAST score (r = ."( Drug withdrawal symptoms in children after continuous infusions of fentanyl.
French, JP; Nocera, M, 1994
)
0.78
" Ketamine (1, 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg) showed relatively weak antinociceptive effects with no apparent dose-response relationship."( Antinociceptive effects of ketamine-opioid combinations in the mouse tail flick test.
Dambisya, YM; Lee, TL, 1994
)
0.29
"This double-blind randomised study compared the analgesic efficacy, respiratory effects, side effects, and pharmacokinetic disposition of 24 hr lumbar epidural and intravenous infusions of the same dosage regimen of fentanyl (1."( A comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for post-thoracotomy analgesia.
Baxter, AD; Goernert, L; Hull, K; Laganière, S; Samson, B; Stewart, J, 1994
)
0.73
"In order to evaluate the anticholinergic effect of fentanyl and pethidine, the influence of these drugs on the cumulative dose-response curves of carbacholine on the guinea-pig ileum has been investigated."( Fentanyl and pethidine are antagonists on muscarinic receptors in guinea-pig ileum.
Hustveit, O; Setekleiv, J, 1993
)
1.98
" Therefore, we prospectively determined the dose-response relationship and the minimum effective combination dose of epidural morphine and fentanyl (fentanyl given after morphine) for posthysterectomy analgesia."( Minimum effective combination dose of epidural morphine and fentanyl for posthysterectomy analgesia: a randomized, prospective, double-blind study.
Akiyoshi, Y; Ashimura, H; Naito, H; Nishijima, Y; Sato, S; Tanaka, M; Watanabe, S, 1993
)
0.73
" We were unable to identify any differences between the two groups with respect to narcotic, benzodiazepine dosage or usage of inhalational agents."( Recall of intraoperative events after general anaesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass.
Devitt, JH; Harrington, EM; McLean, RF; Phillips, AA, 1993
)
0.29
" Dose-response curves for the enhancement of the two drugs on morphine analgesia were bell-shaped."( [Potentiation of morphine- and ohmefentanyl-induced analgesia by cholecystokinin receptor antagonists in rat].
Han, JS; Sun, YH; Zhou, Y, 1993
)
0.56
"Total body clearance of fentanyl is highly variable and it should be dosed to effect."( Pharmacokinetics of continuous infusions of fentanyl in critically ill children.
Katz, R; Kelly, HW, 1993
)
0.85
"To report a case of high transdermal fentanyl dosage requirements in a patient with chronic cancer pain."( High transdermal fentanyl requirements in a patient with chronic cancer pain.
Lehr, VT; Renaud, EA, 1993
)
0.9
" Transdermal fentanyl therapy was initiated on hospital day 1 at 100 micrograms/h and the MS continuous intravenous infusion dosage was increased."( High transdermal fentanyl requirements in a patient with chronic cancer pain.
Lehr, VT; Renaud, EA, 1993
)
0.99
"This patient's high transdermal fentanyl dosage requirement was related to disease progression."( High transdermal fentanyl requirements in a patient with chronic cancer pain.
Lehr, VT; Renaud, EA, 1993
)
0.91
" Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl (10 micrograms/kg every 7[ up to a total dosage of 50 micrograms/kg)."( [Mid-latency auditory evoked potentials during increasing doses of fentanyl].
Faber-Züllig, E; Klasing, S; Peter, K; Rimkus, T; Schwender, D; Tassani, P, 1993
)
0.81
" Both devazepide and L-365,260 showed a bell-shaped dose-response curve."( Increased release of immunoreactive cholecystokinin octapeptide by morphine and potentiation of mu-opioid analgesia by CCKB receptor antagonist L-365,260 in rat spinal cord.
Han, JS; Sun, YH; Zhang, ZW; Zhou, Y, 1993
)
0.29
" The repeated dose pharmacokinetics of this drug using the recommended dosing interval have not been evaluated previously and were determined in the present study."( Transdermal fentanyl for cancer pain. Repeated dose pharmacokinetics.
Foley, KM; Gupta, SK; Inturrisi, CE; Lapin, J; Layman, M; Portenoy, RK; Southam, MA, 1993
)
0.66
"The induction dose-response of propofol was compared with the dose-response of its combination with fentanyl and with that of fentanyl alone in three groups of 60 women undergoing minor gynaecological surgery."( Propofol and fentanyl act additively for induction of anaesthesia.
Bar-Av, E; Ben-Shlomo, I; Etchin, A; Finger, J; Perl, AZ; Tverskoy, M, 1993
)
0.87
" Alterations in dosing regimen were made for inadequate analgesia or side effects."( Epidural fentanyl infusion with patient-controlled epidural analgesia for postoperative analgesia in children.
Azizkhan, RG; Bailey, AG; Caudle, CL; Freid, EB; Lish, MC; Valley, RD, 1993
)
0.7
"Propofol infusion and supplemental fentanyl dosage requirements, oxygen saturation values, respiratory rates, recovery times, and postoperative side effects were recorded."( Use of analgesics during propofol sedation: a comparison of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl.
Ramirez-Ruiz, M; Smith, I; White, PF, 1995
)
0.79
" Multiple venous blood samples were taken throughout the dosing regimen, and the resulting fentanyl, nalmefene, or naloxone plasma concentrations were determined."( Duration of opioid antagonism by nalmefene and naloxone in the dog: an integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison.
Osifchin, E; Veng-Pedersen, P; Waters, SJ; Wilhelm, JA; Zakszewski, TB, 1995
)
0.51
" The fentanyl dose-response line shifted to the right, and was considered to be a sign of the development of cross-tolerance."( Oxytocin blocks the development of heroin-fentanyl cross-tolerance in mice.
Kovács, GL; Kriván, M; Sarnyai, Z; Szabó, G; Telegdy, G, 1995
)
1.07
" Continuous application is considered to be more effective concerning basic anxiety, cumulative dosage and to avoid volume overload in infants and young children, following cardiac surgery; overdosage was not observed."( [Analgosedation with fentanyl/midazolam after correction of congenital heart defects].
Hund, F; Huth, R; Michel-Behnke, I; Oelert, H; Rothes, A; Schmidt, FX; Schranz, D; Wippermann, CF,
)
0.45
" Recommendations for managing opioid-induced muscle hyperactivity include reduction of the opioid dosage and/or administration of clonazepam therapy."( Opioid-induced muscle activity: implications for managing chronic pain.
Levitt, R; Steen, PD; Sylvester, RK, 1995
)
0.29
"8 micrograms carfentanil/kg, the lowest dosage used, was very excited during induction and required intravenous (IV) ketamine to permit safe examination."( Immobilization of black bears (Ursus americanus) with orally administered carfentanil citrate.
Clyde, VL; Ramsay, EC; Sleeman, JM, 1995
)
0.29
" The fentanyl dose-response curve was unchanged by opioid receptor blockade with 10(-6)M naloxone and by alpha and beta adrenoceptor blockade produced by 10(-6)M prazosin and 10(-6)M propranolol."( Direct effects of fentanyl on canine coronary artery rings.
Bridges, MT; Grover, TE; Introna, RP; Pruett, JK; Yodlowski, EH, 1995
)
1.14
" Fifteen epidural initially were dosed with bupivicaine (1 to 2 mg/kg) alone or in combination with fentanyl (1 to 2 micrograms/kg)."( Continuous thoracic epidural infusions for postoperative analgesia after pectus deformity repair.
Abajian, JC; Dicker, R; McBride, WJ; Vane, DW, 1996
)
0.51
" The idazoxan dose-response curve for this suppression of fentanyl antinociception assessed with tail flick latency was the same as that for suppression of xylazine."( Antinociceptive actions of intrathecal xylazine: interactions with spinal cord opioid pathways.
Davies, A; Gent, JP; Goodchild, CS; Guo, Z, 1996
)
0.54
" infusion in the palliative care setting, which necessitates careful titration of dosage according to individual clinical response."( Plasma concentrations of fentanyl with subcutaneous infusion in palliative care patients.
Abbott, F; Maddocks, I; McLean, S; Miller, RS; Parker, D; Peterson, GM, 1995
)
0.59
"Although the cardiopulmonary effects of carfentanil occurred more rapidly, these effects were similar in magnitude for etorphine and carfentanil over the evaluated dosage range."( Comparative cardiopulmonary effects of intramuscularly administered etorphine and carfentanil in goats.
Buss, D; Heard, DJ; Kollias, GV; Nichols, WW, 1996
)
0.29
" The dosage based on experimental studies."( [Clinical investigations of an i.m. combination anesthesia with fentanylclimazolam/xylazine and postoperative i.v. antagonism with naloxone/sarmazenil/yohimbine in guinea pigs].
Brill, T; Erhardt, W; Henke, J; Lendl, C; Matis, U; Otto, K; Roberts, U, 1996
)
0.53
" Fifteen min after each elk became recumbent, we administered naltrexone HCl (25% of dose intravenously, 75% subcutaneously) dosed at 0 (control), 25, 50, or 100 mg/mg carfentanil; after an additional 15 min of immobilization, controls received 500 mg naltrexone HCl/mg carfentanil."( Efficacy and safety of naltrexone hydrochloride for antagonizing carfentanil citrate immobilization in captive Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni).
Lance, WR; Miller, MW; Wild, MA, 1996
)
0.29
" Patients with a 'stable and low level of cancer pain' receiving a constant dosage of sustained release morphine during a pre-study phase of 6 days were included in the study."( Direct conversion from oral morphine to transdermal fentanyl: a multicenter study in patients with cancer pain.
Donner, B; Strumpf, M; Tryba, M; Zenz, M, 1996
)
0.54
" F95-response logistic regression curves, which are analogous to dose-response curves, were calculated for each of the 2 stimuli administered during each of the 5 anesthetic techniques."( EEG Predicts movement response to surgical stimuli during general anesthesia with combinations of isoflurane, 70% N2O, and fentanyl.
Dutton, RC; Smith, NT; Smith, WD, 1996
)
0.5
" The 25-50 micrograms/hr patch appears to be a safe starting dosage in ambulatory patients previously receiving opioids conventionally used for moderate pain."( Transdermal fentanyl in the management of cancer pain in ambulatory patients: an open-label pilot study.
Fidler, P; Hammack, JE; Loprinzi, CL; Mailliard, JA; Michalak, JC; Miser, AW; O'Fallon, JR; Reuter, NF; Rospond, RM; Wilwerding, MB, 1996
)
0.67
" The dosage of epidural morphine used in this study was a likely explanation of this depression."( Does morphine premedication influence the pain and consumption of postoperative analgesics after total knee arthroplasty?
Hendolin, H; Kokki, H; Nuutinen, L; Tuomisto, L, 1996
)
0.29
" It is suggested that a suitable dosage of fentanyl is effective without causing serious side effects for neonate."( [Anesthesia for a patient with HELLP syndrome].
Sakio, H; Satoh, T; Takahashi, H, 1996
)
0.56
" The dosage was calculated from the infusion time (time from start of infusion until specific clinical event)."( [Age-related correlation between EEG parameters and depth of anesthesia under propofol. Effect of fentanyl].
Eckert, O; Lehmkuhl, P; Neulinger, A; Pichlmayr, I; Werry, C, 1996
)
0.51
" The authors compared continuous infusion of fentanyl with bolus dosing in infants after surgery to determine whether continuous infusion is associated with less respiratory depression."( Comparison of continuous infusion of fentanyl to bolus dosing in neonates after surgery.
Denver, KK; McKenzie, S; Moreland, S; Thilo, EH; Townsend, SF; Vaughn, PR, 1996
)
0.83
"In the first phase of the study, 16 patients were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl by continuous infusion (C) or bolus dosing every 2 hours (B) in a double-blinded trial."( Comparison of continuous infusion of fentanyl to bolus dosing in neonates after surgery.
Denver, KK; McKenzie, S; Moreland, S; Thilo, EH; Townsend, SF; Vaughn, PR, 1996
)
0.79
"Continuous infusion of fentanyl at the doses studied is associated with pain control similar to that with bolus dosing at regular intervals."( Comparison of continuous infusion of fentanyl to bolus dosing in neonates after surgery.
Denver, KK; McKenzie, S; Moreland, S; Thilo, EH; Townsend, SF; Vaughn, PR, 1996
)
0.88
"The carfentamil-xylazine combination at the dosage used induced hypoxemia, pronounced arterial hypertension, and significant increase in plasma norepinephrine and decrease in plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid concentrations in bongo antelopes."( Effects of a carfentanil-xylazine combination on cardiopulmonary function and plasma catecholamine concentrations in female bongo antelopes.
Citino, SB; Dawson, R; Schumacher, J, 1997
)
0.3
" Fentanyl pumps and placebo pellets were removed on the third day following implantation and 4 h later mu-opioid receptor saturation binding studies in whole brain ([3H][D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin: DAMGO) or fentanyl analgesic dose-response studies (tailflick assay) were conducted."( Magnitude of tolerance to fentanyl is independent of mu-opioid receptor density.
Chan, KW; Duttory, A; Yoburn, BC, 1997
)
1.51
" injections of morphine or fentanyl, produced antinociceptive tolerance as shown by a significant rightward displacement of the agonist dose-response curves compared to controls."( Competitive and non-competitive NMDA antagonists block the development of antinociceptive tolerance to morphine, but not to selective mu or delta opioid agonists in mice.
Bilsky, EJ; Hruby, VJ; Inturrisi, CE; Porreca, F; Sadée, W, 1996
)
0.59
"5 mg of morphine with a 6-minute lockout and a 4-hour maximum dosage of 30 mg."( Postoperative analgesia with parenteral opioids: does continuous delivery utilizing a transdermal opioid preparation affect analgesic efficacy or patient safety?
Paige, D; Sevarino, FB; Silverman, DG; Sinatra, RS, 1997
)
0.3
"The time and dosage of morphine administered was recorded."( Postoperative analgesia with parenteral opioids: does continuous delivery utilizing a transdermal opioid preparation affect analgesic efficacy or patient safety?
Paige, D; Sevarino, FB; Silverman, DG; Sinatra, RS, 1997
)
0.3
"25% at a dosage of 1 mL."( [Evaluation of 2 dosages of fentanyl in caudal anesthesia. A prospective randomized double-blind study].
Atallah, T; Chelbi, S; Gharsallah, A; Hmouda, H; Kachoukh, M; Said, R; Souguir, S, 1996
)
0.59
" Dosage requirements to reach the initial sedation end points of slurred speech and ptosis of eyelids vary widely from one patient to another."( Multidrug intravenous sedation: determinants of the sedative dose of midazolam.
Finder, RL; Jackson, DL; Moore, PA, 1997
)
0.3
"An assessment of physical, cardiovascular, behavioral, and pharmacologic factors that might predict midazolam dosage requirements for the initial sedation titration was carried out with data collected from a large controlled clinical trial of fentanyl, midazolam, and methohexital sedation for third molar surgery."( Multidrug intravenous sedation: determinants of the sedative dose of midazolam.
Finder, RL; Jackson, DL; Moore, PA, 1997
)
0.48
"This study was designed to determine and compare the dose-response characteristics, speed of onset, and relative potency of single-dose epidural fentanyl (F) and sufentanil (S) for postoperative pain relief."( A randomized, double-blind, dose-response comparison of epidural fentanyl versus sufentanil analgesia after cesarean section.
Grass, JA; Harris, AP; Michitsch, R; Sakima, NT; Schmidt, R; Zuckerman, RL, 1997
)
0.74
" Through an understanding of the pharmacodynamic interaction of volatile anesthetics with opioids and the pharmacokinetic processes responsible for the recovery from drug effect, optimal dosing schemes can thus be developed."( Drug interactions: volatile anesthetics and opioids.
Gan, TJ; Ginsberg, B; Glass, PS; Howell, S, 1997
)
0.3
" Venous blood samples were collected at selected times during and after dosing for a 24-h period and assayed for fentanyl using a radioimmunoassay."( Dose proportionality and pharmacokinetics of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Busch, MA; Egan, TD; Gay, M; Pace, NL; Smith, BG; Streisand, JB, 1998
)
0.75
"This study determined the dose-response relation of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia and described the onset, duration, and quality of analgesia when used as the sole analgesic."( The dose-response relation of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia.
Alves, D; Cork, RC; Hays, R; Palmer, CM; Van Maren, G, 1998
)
0.8
" A dose-response curve indicates that the median effective dose of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia is 14 microg (95% confidence interval, 13-15 microg)."( The dose-response relation of intrathecal fentanyl for labor analgesia.
Alves, D; Cork, RC; Hays, R; Palmer, CM; Van Maren, G, 1998
)
0.79
" In addition, the total daily dose of ketorolac was reduced following a change from intermittent bolus dosing to a continuous infusion."( Prolonged central intravenous ketorolac continuous infusion in a cancer patient with intractable bone pain.
Gordon, RL, 1998
)
0.3
"Adjustments in fentanyl dosing are not required before, during, or after hyperthermic, isolated pulmonary perfusion is established and a steady state of fentanyl is achieved."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl during hyperthermic, isolated lung perfusion.
Pass, HI; Piscitelli, SC; Susla, G; Temeck, BK; Williams, KS, 1998
)
0.98
" When changes in physiologic condition were simulated, effects on the pharmacokinetics of the opioids with possible implications for dosing were obtained only if cardiac output was varied over a wide range."( Application of physiologic models to predict the influence of changes in body composition and blood flows on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil in patients.
Björkman, S; Stanski, DR; Wada, DR, 1998
)
0.5
" was initiated and the dosage was titrated upward to a total of 6613 mg/d by hospital day 16."( Continuous fentanyl infusion: use in severe cancer pain.
Dunlap, DS; Lenz, KL, 1998
)
0.69
" However, smaller doses provided less effective pain relief, and a linear dose-response relationship was demonstrated."( The dose-response relationship of ketorolac as a component of intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine.
Gardner, G; Reuben, SS; Steinberg, RB, 1998
)
0.3
"To evaluate the influence of acute isovolemic hemodilution on the dose-response and time course of action of vecuronium, we studied 60 adult patients with and without hemodilution during surgery."( The influence of acute normovolemic hemodilution on the dose-response and time course of action of vecuronium.
An, G; Li, L; Liao, X; Liu, JH; Luo, LK; Tong, SY; Xue, FS; Zhang, RJ, 1998
)
0.3
"A 55-year-old man with an extensive burn suffered from significant respiratory depression from a low dosage of opioid during wound care and also experienced uncontrolled pain."( Hypnosis after an adverse response to opioids in an ICU burn patient.
Carrougher, G; Gibran, N; Ohrbach, R; Patterson, DR, 1998
)
0.3
" Following equi-effective dosing (T1 > 95%) the duration to 25% T1 recovery, recovery index (25/75), and TOF0."( Neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during desflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane anaesthesia.
Ledowski, T; Linstedt, U; Proppe, D; Sitzlack, D; Wulf, H, 1998
)
0.3
" The convenient, once-every-72 hours dosing regimen is easily adjusted to the individual's need for around-the-clock pain control, and provides stable and predictable therapeutic drug plasma concentrations."( Factors influencing quality of life in cancer patients: the role of transdermal fentanyl in the management of pain.
Payne, R, 1998
)
0.53
" This study was carried out as a dose-response study comparing the effects of increasing sevoflurane concentration (1."( Effects of sevoflurane on intracranial pressure, cerebral blood flow and cerebral metabolism. A dose-response study in patients subjected to craniotomy for cerebral tumours.
Bundgaard, H; Cold, GE; Jensen, KA; Landsfeldt, U; Larsen, KM; Nielsen, E; von Oettingen, G, 1998
)
0.3
" In three groups, propofol, fentanyl and midazolam were administered intravenously in incremental doses to construct dose-response curves for the depressant effects of each one on PNA."( Synergistic interaction between the effects of propofol and midazolam with fentanyl on phrenic nerve activity in rabbits.
Chakrabarti, MK; Ma, D; Sapsed-Byrne, SM; Whitwam, JG, 1998
)
0.82
"(1) To compare the dose-response relations of rocuronium and vecuronium in healthy adult patients anesthetized with nitrous oxide-oxygen-fentanyl-thiopental; and (2) to evaluate the time-course of action of two drugs following equipotent doses."( A comparative study of the dose-response and time course of action of rocuronium and vecuronium in anesthetized adult patients.
An, G; Liao, X; Liu, JH; Luo, LK; Tong, SY; Xue, FS; Zhang, RJ; Zhang, YM, 1998
)
0.5
" The dose-response relations of rocuronium and vecuronium were determined by the cumulative dose-response technique."( A comparative study of the dose-response and time course of action of rocuronium and vecuronium in anesthetized adult patients.
An, G; Liao, X; Liu, JH; Luo, LK; Tong, SY; Xue, FS; Zhang, RJ; Zhang, YM, 1998
)
0.3
" The cumulative dose-response curve of vecuronium was shifted to the left in a parallel fashion compared with that of rocuronium."( A comparative study of the dose-response and time course of action of rocuronium and vecuronium in anesthetized adult patients.
An, G; Liao, X; Liu, JH; Luo, LK; Tong, SY; Xue, FS; Zhang, RJ; Zhang, YM, 1998
)
0.3
" The mean final fentanyl dosage at study completion was 169 (+/- 29) micrograms/hr."( A clinical evaluation of transdermal therapeutic system fentanyl for the treatment of cancer pain.
Hays, H; Moulin, DE; Sloan, PA, 1998
)
0.89
" The conclusion was that pruritus cannot be used as an endpoint for OTFC effectiveness; however, OTFC dosed at 10 micrograms."( Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate as an anaesthetic premedication when dosed to an opioid effect vs total opioid consumption.
Dear, GD; Dear, RB; Ginsberg, B; Margolis, JO; Ross, AK, 1998
)
0.63
" A secondary goal was to determine appropriate dosing guidelines."( Dose-titration, multicenter study of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients using transdermal fentanyl for persistent pain.
Busch, MA; Christie, JM; Coluzzi, P; Nordbrock, E; Patt, R; Portenoy, RK; Simmonds, M, 1998
)
0.55
"Most patients find a single OTFC dosage that adequately treats breakthrough pain."( Dose-titration, multicenter study of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients using transdermal fentanyl for persistent pain.
Busch, MA; Christie, JM; Coluzzi, P; Nordbrock, E; Patt, R; Portenoy, RK; Simmonds, M, 1998
)
0.55
"To estimate the optimum dosing regimen and delivery system for remifentanil, a new opioid, using computer simulations based on information from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models available for fentanyl, alfentanil and remifentanil, as well as from clinical trials of fentanyl and alfentanil."( [Characterization of dose profile of remifentanil with computer simulation: comparative study with fentanyl and alfentanyl].
Gambús, PL; Minto, CF; Schnider, TW, 1998
)
0.7
" Dosing guidelines for remifentanil, fentanyl and alfentanil were estimated for three methods of administration (bolus, bolus + variable continuous infusion or constant continuous infusion)."( [Characterization of dose profile of remifentanil with computer simulation: comparative study with fentanyl and alfentanyl].
Gambús, PL; Minto, CF; Schnider, TW, 1998
)
0.79
" The results are fairly consistent with clinical evidence, demonstrating the power of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models for rationally establishing opioid dosing guidelines."( [Characterization of dose profile of remifentanil with computer simulation: comparative study with fentanyl and alfentanyl].
Gambús, PL; Minto, CF; Schnider, TW, 1998
)
0.52
" Fentanyl and morphine both caused a downward shift in the dose-response curve to extracellular Ca2+ for shortening, with no concomitant effect on the Ca2+ transient."( Differential effects of fentanyl and morphine on intracellular Ca2+ transients and contraction in rat ventricular myocytes.
Damron, DS; Kanaya, N; Murray, PA; Zakhary, DR, 1998
)
1.52
"01 mg/kg) prior to cumulative doses of cocaine produced dose-dependent leftward shifts in the cocaine dose-response function."( Opioid enhancement of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine: evidence for involvement of mu and delta opioid receptors.
Rowlett, JK; Spealman, RD, 1998
)
0.3
" It appears that low intravenous doses of fentanyl act mainly in the spinal cord and that increasing the dosage recruits descending inhibition."( The involvement of bulbospinal pathways in fentanyl-induced inhibition of spinal withdrawal reflexes in the decerebrated rabbit.
Clarke, RW; Houghton, AK; Ogilvie, J; Parry-Baggott, C, 1998
)
0.83
"125% behaves in a dose-response fashion allowing for the determination of equipotent dose of each."( Determination of the analgesic dose-response relationship for epidural fentanyl and sufentanil with bupivacaine 0.125% in laboring patients.
Gadalla, F; Herman, NL; Koff, HD; Reynolds, JE; Rubin, JD; Sheu, KL; Van Decar, TK, 1998
)
0.53
" Afterwards, the opioids were administered continuously with cumulative dosage up to total absence of motor evoked response."( Influence of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil on motor evoked potentials.
Hanisch, M; Hoeft, A; Juntke, R; Nadstawek, J; Pechstein, U; Scheufler, KM; Thees, C; Zentner, J, 1999
)
0.67
" The results indicated that a simple dosing regimen based on weight was unable to give the same depth of anaesthesia in individual rats."( On-line analysis of middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) for monitoring depth of anaesthesia in laboratory rats.
Henneberg, SW; Jensen, EW; Nygaard, M, 1998
)
0.3
" The simulations illustrated that hemorrhagic shock results in higher fentanyl concentrations for any given dosage scheme."( Fentanyl pharmacokinetics in hemorrhagic shock: a porcine model.
Bailey, PL; Egan, TD; Gong, G; Kuramkote, S; McJames, SW; Zhang, J, 1999
)
1.98
" The amount of fentanyl delivered estimated per dose from the ET (fentanyl) system using the iv fentanyl treatment as the reference was similar for the two ET regimens throughout the dosing period."( Reproducible fentanyl doses delivered intermittently at different time intervals from an electrotransport system.
Gupta, SK; Klausner, M; Phipps, B; Sathyan, G; Southam, M, 1999
)
1.03
" We performed this study to establish the dose-response relationship of intrathecal fentanyl for both analgesia and ventilatory depression."( Analgesia, pruritus, and ventilation exhibit a dose-response relationship in parturients receiving intrathecal fentanyl during labor.
Affleck, PJ; Andreasen, A; Brackin, R; Calicott, R; Choi, KC; Fong, J; Gadalla, F; Gomillion, MC; Hartman, JK; Herman, NL; Koff, HD; Lee, SH; Singhal, A; Van Decar, TK, 1999
)
0.74
" Each patient received a standard dosage of fentanyl and propofol, as determined on a kilogram basis."( The combined use of propofol and fentanyl for outpatient intravenous conscious sedation.
Abeles, G; Bisaccia, E; Scarborough, DA; Sequeira, M; Swensen, RD, 1999
)
0.85
" In addition, we obtained dose-response curves for possible local anesthetic effects."( The effects of intradermal fentanyl and ketamine on capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesia and flare reaction.
Blunk, JA; Koppert, W; Likar, R; Schmelz, M; Sittl, R; Zeck, S, 1999
)
0.6
" For prevention of delayed N&V, patients receiving TTS-F for acute N&V were given TTS-F at the same dosage (75 micrograms/h) on days 2-5, whereas patients receiving OND for acute N&V were treated with M 20 mg orally every 6 h on days 2-5, starting 24 h after CDDP."( Prevention of nausea and vomiting (N&V) in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. Assessment of the potential antiemetic activity of transdermal fentanyl (TTS-F) compared to standard antiemetic treatment in acute and delayed N&V: first clinical re
Contu, P; Curreli, L; Macciò, A; Mantovani, G; Massa, D; Massa, E; Mulas, C; Succu, G,
)
0.33
" Under propofol anesthesia, the cumulative dose-response curves of vecuronium were shifted to the left when compared with control ED50 and the slope showed that propofol had potentiated the action of vecuronium."( [Propofol potentiates the neuromuscular blocking effects of vecuronium in man].
Adachi, H; Ohmi, Y; Satoh, T; Watanabe, K, 2000
)
0.31
" Multiple OTFC dosing regimens within the dosage schedule examined in this study can thus be formulated without concern about nonlinear accumulation."( Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers.
Ashburn, MA; Egan, TD; Kievit, J; Pace, NL; Sharma, A; Streisand, JB, 2000
)
0.56
"We observed chest wall rigidity in 8 patients after low dosage of fentanyl (3-5 microg/kg body weight)."( Fentanyl-induced chest wall rigidity and laryngospasm in preterm and term infants.
Bartmann, P; Fahnenstich, H; Kau, N; Steffan, J, 2000
)
1.99
"To provide a rational basis for the dosage of fentanyl in newborn infants by determining clearance in the first days of life."( Gestational age and birth weight effects on plasma clearance of fentanyl in newborn infants.
Fellman, V; Neuvonen, PJ; Saarenmaa, E, 2000
)
0.8
" A dose-response curve indicated that with increasing dosage, the response probability increased, while the magnitude of the induced shift remained stable."( Fentanyl, a upsilon-opioid receptor agonist, phase shifts the hamster circadian pacemaker.
Albus, H; Dahan, A; Duindam, H; Meijer, JH; Ruijs, AC; van de Geest, B; Zwinderman, AH, 2000
)
1.75
" No significant rise occurred in glucose, cortisol and catecholamines in any of the higher dosage groups."( Reducing stress responses in the pre-bypass phase of open heart surgery in infants and young children: a comparison of different fentanyl doses.
Cloote, A; Duncan, HP; Jenkins, I; Murphy, PJ; Pawade, AK; Rogers, CA; Weir, PM; Wolf, AR, 2000
)
0.51
" However, clinicians should realize that the manufacturer's recommendations for equianalgesic dosing of transdermal fentanyl may result in initial doses that are too low in some patients, and in a titration period that is too long."( An alternative algorithm for dosing transdermal fentanyl for cancer-related pain.
Breitbart, W; Chandler, S; Eagel, B; Ellison, N; Enck, RE; Lefkowitz, M; Payne, R, 2000
)
0.77
" In this article we described basic properties and dosing guidelines for TF and our own experience with use of Durogesic in the treatment of cancer pain."( [Research from the Palliative Care Department in Poznań on treatment of neoplasm pain with Durogesic (transdermal fentanyl)].
Gorzelińska, L; Kozikowska, J; Leppert, W; Luczak, J, 2000
)
0.52
" For groups A and B, when cervical dilatation exceeded 4 cm, 10 to 15 mL of 5 x 10(-2)% bupivacaine and 2 x 10(-4)% fentanyl were injected epidurally and a continuous low dosage was maintained until full dilatation of the cervix resulted."( Effects of epidural fentanyl on labor pain during the early period of the first stage of induced labor in nulliparous women.
Chen, LK; Hsieh, FJ; Hsu, HW; Huang, CH; Lee, CN; Lin, CJ; Tsai, SK, 2000
)
0.84
" Subjects were then tested for tolerance in the distinctive context using the tail-flick procedure and dose-response curve methodology."( Associative and non-associative fentanyl tolerance in the rat: evaluation of cross tolerance with mu-and kappa-specific opioids.
Carter, BL; Conklin, CA; Tiffany, ST, 2000
)
0.59
" The bispectral analysis (BIS) of the EEG correlates well with the clinical dose-response of hypnotic drugs during induction, but the effect on BIS of an opiate induction, as for coronary bypass surgery, is not known."( Effects on the bispectral index during medium-high dose fentanyl induction with or without propofol supplement.
Anderson, RE; Barr, G; Jakobsson, JG; Owall, A, 2000
)
0.55
"The dosage of transdermal fentanyl had to be increased on average 50% over that indicated by the manufacturer."( Opioid treatment of painful chronic pancreatitis.
Larsen, S; Madsen, LG; Niemann, T; Thorsgaard, N, 2000
)
0.61
" However, the dosage often has to be increased above that recommended by the manufacturer."( Opioid treatment of painful chronic pancreatitis.
Larsen, S; Madsen, LG; Niemann, T; Thorsgaard, N, 2000
)
0.31
" However, the incidence of intraoperative adverse events and other postoperative sequelae, recovery times, pain and nausea visual analog scale scores, opioid analgesic dosage requirements in the postanesthetic care unit, and satisfaction survey responses were similar between groups."( A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of remifentanil versus fentanyl as an adjuvant to general anesthesia for outpatient gynecologic surgery.
Beers, RA; Calimlim, JR; Camporesi, EM; Esposito, BF; Uddoh, E, 2000
)
0.55
" The dose-response effect of fentanyl on arterial baroreflex control of circumflex conductance was examined during the immediate 8 s circumflex vasodilator response to a step rise in aortic pressure caused by inflation of an intra-aortic balloon."( Effect of fentanyl on baroreflex control of circumflex coronary conductance.
Cottee, DB; McIlveen, SA; Moore, PG; Quail, AW; White, SW, 2000
)
1
" No correlation between dosage of fentanyl given and either age or percentage of total body surface area burned was observed."( The efficacy and safety of fentanyl for the management of severe procedural pain in patients with burn injuries.
Burd, RS; Linneman, PK; Terry, BE,
)
0.71
" Fentanyl dosing strategies, with or without midazolam, do not prevent a hormonal or metabolic stress response in infants undergoing cardiac surgery."( Stress response in infants undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized study of fentanyl bolus, fentanyl infusion, and fentanyl-midazolam infusion.
Casta, A; Chakravorti, S; Davis, PJ; Gruber, EM; Hansen, DD; Hickey, PR; Laussen, PC; McGowan, FX; Odegard, KC; Reid, R; Zimmerman, AA; Zurakowski, D, 2001
)
1.45
" We hypothesised that the use of a very low concentration technique (ropivacaine/fentanyl) might result in excessive dosing in the PCEA group, more motor blockade and a negative impact on spontaneous delivery rate."( Ropivacaine 1 mg/ml, plus fentanyl 2 microg/ml for epidural analgesia during labour. Is mode of administration important?
Gjessing, L; Smedvig, JP; Soreide, E, 2001
)
0.84
" On the basis of the dose-response curve analysis, ohmefentanyl stereoisomers displayed a significant difference in place preference ED50."( Quantitative comparison of ohmefentanyl isomers induced conditioning place preference in mice.
Chen, XJ; Chi, ZQ; Guo, GW; Jin, WQ; Liu, ZH; Zhang, HP; Zhu, YC, 2001
)
0.84
" In the 16 who received fentanyl for > or =3 months until death, the median dose was unchanged (100 microg/h) 3 months before death and at death; 8/16 required no dosage change."( Long-term observations of patients receiving transdermal fentanyl after a randomized trial.
Ahmedzai, SH; Brooks, D; Davis, C; Nugent, M, 2001
)
0.86
"To present the authors' technique for epidural catheter placement and dosing protocol, and to demonstrate the results from postoperative pain control after anterior spinal instrumented fusion for 10 consecutive patients."( Postoperative pain control using epidural catheters after anterior spinal fusion for adolescent scoliosis.
Burd, T; Gaines, RW; Kittle, D; Lowry, KJ; Tobias, J, 2001
)
0.31
" The authors believe that this lack of consensus stems from varied epidural dosing protocols and techniques in catheter placement, which they have witnessed anecdotally at their own institution."( Postoperative pain control using epidural catheters after anterior spinal fusion for adolescent scoliosis.
Burd, T; Gaines, RW; Kittle, D; Lowry, KJ; Tobias, J, 2001
)
0.31
" Dosing consisted of fentanyl (1 microg/kg) and hydromorphone (5 microg/kg) diluted in preservative-free saline (0."( Postoperative pain control using epidural catheters after anterior spinal fusion for adolescent scoliosis.
Burd, T; Gaines, RW; Kittle, D; Lowry, KJ; Tobias, J, 2001
)
0.63
"By following the dosing protocol described, epidural catheters can be used safely and effectively to control postoperative pain after anterior instrumentation and spinal fusion for adolescent scoliosis."( Postoperative pain control using epidural catheters after anterior spinal fusion for adolescent scoliosis.
Burd, T; Gaines, RW; Kittle, D; Lowry, KJ; Tobias, J, 2001
)
0.31
" Five patients required rescue dosing every two hours on some treatment days."( Transdermal fentanyl in the hospice: a survey of rescue dosing and pain control.
Robards, M,
)
0.51
" Patients received OTFC units at a starting dosage strength determined in the short-term trial (200-1600 microg)."( Long-term safety of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for breakthrough cancer pain.
Berris, R; Busch, MA; Coluzzi, P; Hart, L; Loseth, DB; Lyss, A; Nordbrook, E; Payne, R; Portenoy, RK; Rauck, R; Simmonds, M, 2001
)
0.58
" Second, increasing dosage of morphine often reduces pain, at the same time patients become drowsy."( [Issues in cancer pain management].
Hoka, S; Matoba, M; Murakami, S, 2001
)
0.31
" Transdermal fentanyl dosage was titrated upwards as required."( Opioids in non-cancer pain: a life-time sentence?
Dellemijn, PL, 2001
)
0.68
" Recovery profile was assessed by recording time spent in the postanesthesia care unit and step-down recovery unit, number and timing of adverse events, timing and dosage of rescue medications, and time to eligibility for discharge (to home or to hospital room)."( Hemodynamics and emergence profile of remifentanil versus fentanyl prospectively compared in a large population of surgical patients.
Fleisher, LA; Hogue, S; Jamerson, B; Twersky, RS; Warner, DS, 2001
)
0.55
"BIS monitoring of depth of hypnosis can influence requirements for fentanyl during total intravenous anesthesia by bolus dosing for maintenance of analgesia."( [Influence of bispectral index monitoring on fentanyl requirements during total intravenous anesthesia for major gynecological surgery].
Alamo, F; Caba, F; Echevarría, M; Gómez, P; Hachero, A; Merino, S; Rodríguez, R, 2001
)
0.81
" Demand boluses of IV fentanyl equivalent in dosage to 50-100% of the final CII rate remained available via PCA during the 24 hours after patch application."( A safe and effective method for converting cancer patients from intravenous to transdermal fentanyl.
Khojainova, N; Kornick, CA; Manfredi, PL; Payne, R; Primavera, LH; Santiago-Palma, J, 2001
)
0.85
" Development of opioid abstinence syndrome was evaluated during fentanyl and methadone dosage reductions and for 72 hours thereafter."( Enteral methadone to expedite fentanyl discontinuation and prevent opioid abstinence syndrome in the PICU.
Cash, J; Lugo, RA; MacLaren, R; Pribble, CG; Vernon, DD, 2001
)
0.84
"Satisfactory analgesia was achieved in both groups, though the required drug dosage was higher in the intranasal group (1."( Intranasal fentanyl provides adequate postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients.
Ghosh, BR; Handa, K; Laha, A; Lahiri, A; Manjushree, R, 2002
)
0.7
" Examples for calculating required drug dosage depending on the clinical situation and the route of administration."( [New Level III opioids of the World Health Organization].
Laval, G; Mallaret, M; Sang, B; Villard, ML, 2002
)
0.31
" The dosing interval for these systems is generally 3 days."( Treatment of cancer pain with transdermal fentanyl.
Gourlay, GK, 2001
)
0.57
" This case report demonstrates the successful management of the patient with analgesia provided by a continuous spinal catheter dosed with a continuous infusion of fentanyl and supplemental meperidine."( Continuous spinal analgesia for labor and delivery in a parturient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Amano, K; Hoka, S; Kikuchi, S; Okamoto, H; Okutomi, T, 2002
)
0.51
" However, when making a choice between fentanyl and sufentanil, one must consider other important factors, such as the higher cost of sufentanil and the greater risk of dosing error due to the higher potency of sufentanil compared with fentanyl."( A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor analgesia.
D'Angelo, R; Nelson, KE; Rauch, T; Terebuh, V, 2002
)
0.88
" Anesthesia was rapidly and completely reversed by intravenous injections of naltrexone at 30 times the THAI dosage (0."( Anesthesia of boma-captured Lichtenstein's hartebeest (Sigmoceros lichtensteinii) with a combination of thiafentanil, medetomidine, and ketamine.
Bush, M; Citino, SB; Grobler, D; Lance, W, 2002
)
0.31
" Clocinnamox (10 mg/kg) produced a 7- and 12-fold further decrease in morphine and fentanyl potency, respectively, a reduction in the slope of the morphine dose-response curve, and a suppression of the maximal morphine responding for buprenorphine."( Clocinnamox distinguishes opioid agonists according to relative efficacy in normal and morphine-treated rats trained to discriminate morphine.
Walker, EA; Young, AM, 2002
)
0.54
" Dose-response curves for the antinociceptive effects of ketamine alone and ketamine in conjunction with the mu opioid fentanyl were constructed."( Potentiation by ketamine of fentanyl antinociception. I. An experimental study in rats showing that ketamine administered by non-spinal routes targets spinal cord antinociceptive systems.
Bajunaki, E; Goodchild, CS; Nadeson, R; Tucker, A, 2002
)
0.82
" For 48 hrs, sedation was kept constant at a level according to Ramsay Scale 3 while we adjusted the dosage of propofol given per hour."( Progressive electroencephalogram frequency deceleration despite constant depth of propofol-induced sedation.
Adam, S; Albrecht, MD; Kuhlisch, E; Ragaller, M; Theilen, HJ, 2002
)
0.31
" It is suggested that the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation and incision may be effectively inhibited in combination URA with fentanyl, and the dosage of fentanyl might reduce."( [Effects of urapidil on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation and incision during fentanyl co-induction].
Cai, HW; Yang, HB, 2000
)
0.73
" Using a mouse hot-plate test, dose-response relationships were first determined for all compounds individually and then for opioids co-administered with fixed doses of ketamine or dextromethorphan."( Dextromethorphan and ketamine potentiate the antinociceptive effects of mu- but not delta- or kappa-opioid agonists in a mouse model of acute pain.
Baker, AK; Hoffmann, VL; Meert, TF, 2002
)
0.31
" Using a mouse hot-plate test, dose-response relationships were first determined for all compounds individually and then for opioids co-administered with fixed doses of clonidine, ketamine or dextromethorphan."( Interactions of NMDA antagonists and an alpha 2 agonist with mu, delta and kappa opioids in an acute nociception assay.
Baker, AK; Hoffmann, VL; Meert, TF, 2002
)
0.31
" These findings suggest that potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, such as flunixin, may be useful alternatives to opioid-based agents for the control of acute postoperative pain associated with a minor surgical procedure and highlight the importance of assessing the risk-benefit ratio when selecting analgesics and dosing regimens."( Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in a rat model of incisional pain.
Martin, WJ; St A Stewart, L, 2003
)
0.32
" Modified cassette, or "cocktail," dosing is useful for assessing drug interactions in humans."( Simultaneous assessment of drug interactions with low- and high-extraction opioids: application to parecoxib effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil.
Feldman, J; Ibrahim, AE; Karim, A; Kharasch, ED, 2003
)
0.51
" Measuring rectal body temperatures, dose-response relationships were established for all compounds."( Morphine and d-amphetamine nullify each others' hypothermic effects in mice.
Baker, A; Meert, T, 2003
)
0.32
" However, patients might have a better outcome with a reduction of morphine dosage and administration of a muscle relaxant of shorter duration of action than pancuronium."( A randomized trial of caudal block with bupivacaine 4 mg x kg-1 (1.8 ml x kg-1) plus morphine (150 microg x kg-1) vs general anaesthesia with fentanyl for cardiac surgery.
Castillo-Zamora, C; Nava-Ocampo, AA; Rojas-Pérez, E, 2003
)
0.52
"Recently, the Food and Drug Administration increased the celecoxib dosage recommendation from 200 mg to 400 mg for acute pain management."( The efficacy of celecoxib premedication on postoperative pain and recovery times after ambulatory surgery: a dose-ranging study.
Issioui, T; Klein, K; Recart, A; Shah, M; Stool, L; Watcha, MF; White, PF, 2003
)
0.32
" Demand boluses of IV fentanyl equivalent in dosage to 50-100% of the CI rate remained available by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)."( A safe and effective method for converting patients from transdermal to intravenous fentanyl for the treatment of acute cancer-related pain.
Kornick, CA; Manfredi, PL; O'Brien, PC; Payne, R; Santiago-Palma, J; Schulman, G; Weigand, S, 2003
)
0.86
" Rescue dosing was less than recommended, in relation to prescribed transdermal fentanyl strength in 21 patients (60 percent) and greater than recommended in one patient (3 percent)."( Breakthrough strong opioid analgesia prescription in patients using transdermal fentanyl admitted to a hospice.
Lawrie, I; Lloyd-Williams, M; Waterhouse, E,
)
0.59
" Similar steady state serum concentrations were obtained when multiple doses of TTS fentanyl were administered every 48 or 72 h over 8 or 9 days, with less fluctuation in serum concentrations during the 48 h dosing interval."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl following intravenous and transdermal administration in horses.
Kollias-Baker, C; Maxwell, LK; Slovis, N; Thomasy, SM, 2003
)
0.87
" In this study, potential neuronal sites and mechanisms responsible for the disturbances were investigated, dose-response relationships were established, and it was determined whether general anesthesia plays a role."( Mu-opioid receptor agonist effects on medullary respiratory neurons in the cat: evidence for involvement in certain types of ventilatory disturbances.
Lalley, PM, 2003
)
0.32
" The changing of PL and IPL with time passing and anesthesia dosage was studied to discuss the feature of ABR in each anesthesia procedure as above."( [Clinical study on applying brainstem auditory evoked potential to monitor anesthesia depth and awaken in children].
Chen, YQ; Hu, JQ; Li, NL; Liu, H; Wang, DZ, 2003
)
0.32
"There is a significant positive correlation between PL and IPL of ABR waves as above and the dosage of propofol or the concentration of isoflurane."( [Clinical study on applying brainstem auditory evoked potential to monitor anesthesia depth and awaken in children].
Chen, YQ; Hu, JQ; Li, NL; Liu, H; Wang, DZ, 2003
)
0.32
" This issue has important practical implications when patients are attempting to identify the appropriate dosage of OTFC to control their pain."( A pharmacokinetic study to compare two simultaneous 400 microg doses with a single 800 microg dose of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Egan, TD; Kern, SE; Kisicki, JC; Lee, M, 2003
)
0.53
"In the dosage used here, epinephrine did not improve epidural lumbar analgesia."( Epinephrine added to a lumbar epidural infusion of a small-dose ropivacaine-fentanyl mixture after arterial bypass surgery of the lower extremities.
Aromaa, U; Förster, JG; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, TT; Rosenberg, PH; Seppälä, TA, 2003
)
0.55
" The median daily dosage strength of transdermal fentanyl was 75."( Patient-reported utilization patterns of fentanyl transdermal system and oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release among patients with chronic nonmalignant pain.
Ackerman, SJ; Brennan, M; Mordin, M; Reblando, J; Schein, J; Vallow, S; Xu, X,
)
0.65
" With time the dosing often increases because of tolerance."( Methadone dosage for prevention of opioid withdrawal in children.
Cimino, M; Fletcher, JE; Heard, AM; Heard, CM; Kielma, D; Siddappa, R, 2003
)
0.32
"For opioid-tolerant patients, conventional patient-controlled analgesia dosing may be ineffective."( Preoperative fentanyl infusion with pharmacokinetic simulation for anesthetic and perioperative management of an opioid-tolerant patient.
Davis, JJ; Egan, TD; Johnson, KB; Snell, TE; Swenson, JD; Vezina, DP, 2003
)
0.69
"Both total dosage and effect-site concentration of fentanyl were higher in the TIVA group than in the GOS group, and total prescription time in the TIVA group was significantly less during the 24 hrs after the operation."( [Comparison of requirement for postoperative analgesics after inhalation and total intravenous anesthesia].
Iwakiri, H; Kamata, K; Nagata, O; Ozaki, M, 2003
)
0.57
" Dosing of the analgesics and sedatives was based on a neonatal sedation score for ventilated infants."( Endogenous distress in ventilated full-term newborns with acute respiratory failure.
Aretz, S; Licht, C; Roth, B, 2004
)
0.32
"5 microg/kg), dosed 1 hour after oral quinidine (600 mg) or placebo."( Quinidine as a probe for the role of p-glycoprotein in the intestinal absorption and clinical effects of fentanyl.
Altuntas, TG; Hoffer, C; Kharasch, ED; Whittington, D, 2004
)
0.54
" Fentanyl was similar, probably because the dosing algorithm demanded frequent monitoring and adjustment, thereby preventing over-sedation."( Remifentanil versus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial [ISRCTN43755713].
Bonome, C; Cross, MH; Kirkham, AJ; López, A; Morrison, L; Muellejans, B, 2004
)
1.56
" All patients had cancer, cancer-related pain syndromes, and were opioid tolerant with an oral morphine equivalent daily dosage (MEDD) of (> or =40 mg/day."( Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in the outpatient management of severe cancer pain crises: a retrospective case series.
Burton, AW; Driver, LC; Mendoza, TR; Syed, G,
)
0.47
" As the fentanyl dosage was excessive even in some patients who followed the recommended morphine/fentanyl conversion of 150:1, it is dangerous to use the conversion ratio of 78:1 at first."( A study of transdermal fentanyl in cancer pain at Aichi-Cancer Center.
Hasegawa, M; Hosoda, R; Kamiya, Y; Kato, K; Mizaki, T; Nitta, M; Yamazaki, S, 2004
)
1.07
" Fourteen patients receiving strong opioids who had increased their dosage more than 100% in the last week unsuccessfully were randomly chosen to add a second opioid to the first using an initial equivalent dosage of 20% of the previous therapy."( Addition of a second opioid may improve opioid response in cancer pain: preliminary data.
Casuccio, A; Ferrera, P; Mercadante, S; Villari, P, 2004
)
0.32
"This health outcomes analysis based on data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial determined dose-response relationship between opioid use and related symptoms."( Dose-response relationship between opioid use and adverse effects after ambulatory surgery.
Chen, C; Cheung, RY; Chung, F; Hanna, DB; Raymundo, AL; Zhao, SZ, 2004
)
0.32
" Further, we attempted to derive suggested dosing mass weights for fentanyl that improved predicted accuracy."( Accuracy of pharmacokinetic models for predicting plasma fentanyl concentrations in lean and obese surgical patients: derivation of dosing weight ("pharmacokinetic mass").
Bairamian, M; Inchiosa, MA; Sawada, K; Shibutani, K, 2004
)
0.8
" We used the exponential equation for Shafer performance error versus TBW to derive suggested dosing weights ("pharmacokinetic mass") for obese patients."( Accuracy of pharmacokinetic models for predicting plasma fentanyl concentrations in lean and obese surgical patients: derivation of dosing weight ("pharmacokinetic mass").
Bairamian, M; Inchiosa, MA; Sawada, K; Shibutani, K, 2004
)
0.57
" Dosing weight (pharmacokinetic mass) derived from the nonlinear relationship between prediction error and TBW proved to have a linear relationship with clearance."( Accuracy of pharmacokinetic models for predicting plasma fentanyl concentrations in lean and obese surgical patients: derivation of dosing weight ("pharmacokinetic mass").
Bairamian, M; Inchiosa, MA; Sawada, K; Shibutani, K, 2004
)
0.57
" No change in OTF dosing in the elderly would appear necessary because of altered pharmacokinetics."( Influence of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate.
Hoffer, C; Kharasch, ED; Whittington, D, 2004
)
0.55
" In this respect, further studies related to dosage of intrathecal levobupivacaine in obstetric labor analgesia will be beneficial in substantiating this point."( Intrathecal labor analgesia using levobupivacaine 2.5 mg with fentanyl 25 microg--would half the dose suffice?
Chan, SY; Chiu, JW, 2004
)
0.56
" Regular pain assessments combined with appropriate analgesic administration at regular dosing intervals, adjunctive drug therapy for control of adverse effects and associated symptoms, and nonpharmacological interventions are recommended."( Cancer pain management in children.
Mercadante, S, 2004
)
0.32
" The time when consciousness loss and recovery occurred, dosage of propofol for anesthesia maintenance, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded."( [Intravenous propofol combined with fentanyl for anesthesia during ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval].
Chen, SL; Chen, Y; Liu, GW; Shi, YS; Xu, JS, 2004
)
0.6
" The maintenance dosage of propofol in group B (0."( [Intravenous propofol combined with fentanyl for anesthesia during ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval].
Chen, SL; Chen, Y; Liu, GW; Shi, YS; Xu, JS, 2004
)
0.6
"Anesthesia with propofol combined with fentanyl may reduce the maintenance dosage of propofol, shorten the time of consciousness recovery during oocyte retrieval with ultrasound guidance, and can be helpful for the patients' early recovery and discharge from hospital."( [Intravenous propofol combined with fentanyl for anesthesia during ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval].
Chen, SL; Chen, Y; Liu, GW; Shi, YS; Xu, JS, 2004
)
0.87
" Long-acting oral opioids supply satisfactory analgesia at more convenient dosing intervals."( Advances in opioid therapy and formulations.
Walsh, D, 2005
)
0.33
" During the long-term treatment, the transdermal fentanyl dosage had to be increased."( [Home palliative care--2 case reports: a long-term cancer pain management with transdermal fentanyl].
Fujimoto, M; Kuroda, T; Mizutani, Y; Sakuyama, T; Yanaga, K, 2004
)
0.8
" Fentanyl (in post-anesthesia care unit) and paracetamol (at home) were supplementary analgesics and the dosage was also recorded."( [Comparison of preemptive analgesia efficacy between etoricoxib and rofecoxib in ambulatory gynecological surgery].
Liu, W; Loo, CC; Ren, HZ; Tan, HM; Ye, TH, 2004
)
1.23
" In this study, the pharmacokinetics of a novel sublingual dosage form of fentanyl developed for breakthrough pain was evaluated."( Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of different doses of fentanyl following sublingual administration of a rapidly dissolving tablet to cancer patients: a new approach to treatment of incident pain.
Bredenberg, S; Hedner, T; Holmberg, M; Lennernäs, B; Lennernäs, H; Nyström, C, 2005
)
0.81
" After resection of the tumor, propofol dosage was reduced to 3-6 mg x kg(-1) x hr(-1), keeping the BIS values around 60."( [Anesthetic management with propofol during pheochromocytoma resection under bispectral index monitoring].
Ishida, K; Morimoto, Y; Nakamura, M; Sakabe, T; Utada, K; Yamashita, S, 2004
)
0.32
" Plasma concentrations were measured in additional cats after intranasal or oral dosing (2 microg/kg) and after 30 microg/kg in PLO gel."( Relationship between plasma concentrations and analgesia after intravenous fentanyl and disposition after other routes of administration in cats.
Keuhnel, G; Robertson, SA; Sear, JW; Taylor, PM, 2005
)
0.56
" Specifically, a technique based on pharmacokinetic modeling is described that predicts safe and therapeutic opioid dosing in these patients."( Postoperative care of the chronic opioid-consuming patient.
Davis, JJ; Johnson, KB; Swenson, JD, 2005
)
0.33
"Therapeutic hypothermia may alter the required dosage of analgesics and sedatives, but no data are available on the effects of mild hypothermia on plasma fentanyl concentration during continuous, long-term administration."( The effect of mild hypothermia on plasma fentanyl concentration and biotransformation in juvenile pigs.
Bauer, R; Fritz, HG; Holzmayr, M; Lupp, A; Moeritz, KU; Walter, B, 2005
)
0.79
" The optimum dosage for nyala was a combination of A3080 (40-50 microg/kg), MED (60-80 microg/kg) plus 200 mg of KET/animal."( Anaesthesia of nyala (Tragelaphus angasi) with a combination of thiafentanil (A3080), medetomidine and ketamine.
Bush, M; Cooper, DV; Grobler, D; Jessup, D; Lance, W, 2005
)
0.33
"81 mcg/kg), but no significant difference was found in pentobarbital dosing between groups 1 and 2, respectively (4."( Moderate sedation for MRI in young children with autism.
Garrett, NT; Hazlett, HC; Piven, J; Ross, AK; Wilkerson, C, 2005
)
0.33
" Pharmacokinetics and mu-opioid receptor occupancy of nalmefene after single and repeated dosing over 7 days was studied in 12 healthy subjects."( Prolonged central mu-opioid receptor occupancy after single and repeated nalmefene dosing.
Aalto, S; Hagelberg, N; Hietala, J; Ingman, K; Juhakoski, A; Kallio, A; Karhuvaara, S; Någren, K; Oikonen, V; Scheinin, H, 2005
)
0.33
"A dose-response relationship between fentanyl and artificial feeding has not been reported elsewhere."( The impact of intrapartum analgesia on infant feeding.
Bradshaw, C; Emery, S; Friswell, W; Jordan, S; Watkins, A, 2005
)
0.6
" In groups 6 and 7, additional fentanyl doses were lower than in the other groups, but only in group 7 was the total fentanyl dosage low."( Effectiveness of eutectic mixture of local anesthetic cream and occlusive dressing with low dosage of fentanyl for pain control during shockwave lithotripsy.
Basar, H; Basar, MM; Batislam, E; Ozcan, S; Tuglu, D; Yilmaz, E, 2005
)
0.83
"We previously proposed dosing weights for fentanyl, termed 'pharmacokinetic mass', that span the total body weight (TBW) range from 40 to 210 kg."( Pharmacokinetic mass of fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in lean and obese patients.
Bairamian, M; Inchiosa, MA; Sawada, K; Shibutani, K, 2005
)
0.9
" Comparisons were made for dosing requirements and effective plasma concentrations for 37 lean patients (body mass index < 30, TBW < 85 kg) and 33 obese patients (body mass index > 30, TBW > or = 85 kg)."( Pharmacokinetic mass of fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in lean and obese patients.
Bairamian, M; Inchiosa, MA; Sawada, K; Shibutani, K, 2005
)
0.64
"The relationship between dose and pharmacokinetic mass, compared with that of dose vs TBW, may provide confidence for the use of pharmacokinetic mass as a dosing approximation for fentanyl."( Pharmacokinetic mass of fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in lean and obese patients.
Bairamian, M; Inchiosa, MA; Sawada, K; Shibutani, K, 2005
)
0.83
"When opioids are used for postoperative pain control, it is useful to define the dose-response relationship for analgesia and respiratory depression."( Preoperative "fentanyl challenge" as a tool to estimate postoperative opioid dosing in chronic opioid-consuming patients.
Davis, JJ; Dillon, JD; Egan, TD; Hall, RH; Johnson, KB; Niu, SY; Pace, NL; Swenson, JD, 2005
)
0.69
"This study illustrates that whilst low doses of intrathecal bupivacaine can be effectively used for Caesarean section, at such doses EVE does not appear to offer reliable or clinically relevant reductions in dosing with intrathecal bupivacaine."( Effect of epidural volume extension on dose requirement of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine at Caesarean section.
Beale, N; Columb, MO; Evans, B; Lyons, G; Plaat, F; Stocks, GM, 2005
)
0.33
" Dose-response curves for the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine were generated in the absence and presence of fentanyl."( Fentanyl attenuates alpha1B-adrenoceptor-mediated pulmonary artery contraction.
Ding, X; McCune, DF; Murray, PA; Perez, DM; Sohn, JT, 2005
)
1.98
"To review the evidence for dosing and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in the management of pain and produce dosing guidelines."( Evidence-based oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) dosing guidelines.
Aronoff, GM; Brennan, MJ; Ginsberg, B; Pritchard, DD,
)
0.65
"Information was crucially examined and synthesized into guidelines for use and dosing of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in cancer and noncancer pain."( Evidence-based oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) dosing guidelines.
Aronoff, GM; Brennan, MJ; Ginsberg, B; Pritchard, DD,
)
0.63
" Statistically significant multivariate predictors of hypotension 0-10 min after anesthetic induction included: ASA III-V, baseline MAP <70 mm Hg, age > or =50 yr, the use of propofol for induction of anesthesia, and increasing induction dosage of fentanyl."( Predictors of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia.
Baez, B; Bernstein, A; Bodian, CA; Hossain, S; Krol, M; Patel, P; Reich, DL, 2005
)
0.51
" An epidural catheter was inserted but not dosed until patients requested further analgesia."( Chronobiology of subarachnoid fentanyl for labor analgesia.
Harris, L; Lee, S; Pan, PH, 2005
)
0.62
"Intermittent epidural bolus dosing is a method of drug delivery that can prolong the duration of labour analgesia induced by a combined spinal epidural (CSE)."( Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion.
Lim, Y; Ocampo, C; Sia, AT, 2005
)
0.33
" The on-demand dosing and pharmacokinetics of this system differentiate it from the passive transdermal formulation of fentanyl designed for the management of chronic pain."( The fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS): an alternative to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the postoperative setting.
Sinatra, R, 2005
)
1.1
" The objective of these studies was to determine the effect of dosing frequency on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl delivered by the PCTS."( The effect of dosing frequency on the pharmacokinetics of a fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS).
Gidwani, S; Gupta, S; Sathyan, G; Zomorodi, K, 2005
)
0.78
"The amount of fentanyl absorbed from the PCTS increases as a function of time and is independent of both dosing frequency and total number of doses delivered."( The effect of dosing frequency on the pharmacokinetics of a fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS).
Gidwani, S; Gupta, S; Sathyan, G; Zomorodi, K, 2005
)
0.93
" A fixed ratio of 1 mg CAR:10 mg XYL intramuscularly was used, increasing or decreasing the dosage until the optimal dosage (defined by an induction time < 3 min and PaCO(2)< 60 mmHg) was reached for each animal."( Determination and evaluation of an optimal dosage of carfentanil and xylazine for the immobilization of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus).
Miller, KV; Osborn, DA; Ramsay, EC; Schumacher, J; Storms, TN; Zagaya, N, 2005
)
0.33
" We undertook this study to assess the sedative drug doses administered during bronchoscopy in lung transplant recipients and to assess if there is a change in the dosage requirements over time following lung transplantation."( Sedative drug requirements during bronchoscopy are higher in cystic fibrosis after lung transplantation.
Aboyoun, C; Chhajed, PN; Chhajed, TP; Glanville, AR; Harrison, GA; Leuppi, JD; Malouf, MA; Tamm, M, 2005
)
0.33
" An in vivo dose-response analysis was performed on medullary respiratory neurons of adult cats to investigate two untested hypotheses related to mechanisms of opioid-mediated rhythm slowing: 1) Opiates suppress intrinsic conductances that limit discharge duration in medullary inspiratory and expiratory neurons, and 2) opiates delay the onset and lengthen the duration of discharges postsynaptically in phase-regulating postinspiratory and late-inspiratory neurons."( Opiate slowing of feline respiratory rhythm and effects on putative medullary phase-regulating neurons.
Lalley, PM, 2006
)
0.33
"To analyze whether emergence agitation could be reduced by using a low dosage of fentanyl without causing an increase in postoperative adverse effects and/or affecting the patient's quality of life after discharge."( The effects of low-dose fentanyl on emergence agitation and quality of life in patients with moderate developmental disabilities.
Chen, CC; Hung, WT; Liou, CM; Tsai, WY, 2005
)
0.86
" Increasing magnesium dosage did not offer any advantages, but induced haemodynamic consequences."( Effects of three different dose regimens of magnesium on propofol requirements, haemodynamic variables and postoperative pain relief in gynaecological surgery.
Akpir, K; Kayacan, S; Pembeci, K; Seyhan, TO; Sungur, MO; Telci, L; Tugrul, M, 2006
)
0.33
" Hypnotic and lethal dose-response curves were constructed for thiopenthal alone and in combination with fentanyl (0."( Interaction between thiopental and fentanyl in mice is different between hypnotic and lethal doses.
Ben-Abraham, R; Ben-Shlomo, I; Hadash, O; Katz, Y, 2005
)
0.82
" Approximately 30-60 mins after the first dosing of methadone, the infant's heart rate decreased from his baseline of 130-140 beats/min to 80-90 beats/min for 30 seconds."( Bradycardia during methadone therapy in an infant.
Tobias, JD; Wheeler, AD, 2006
)
0.33
" Recommendation on dosage are given."( Experience with drugs for capture and restraint of wildebeest, impala, eland and hartebeest in Kenya.
Drevemo, SA; Grootenhuis, JG; Karstad, L, 1976
)
0.26
" manufacturer's recommendations for equilalagesic dosing of transdermal fentanyl may result in initial doses that produce subtherapeutic levels and unrelieved pain in some patients."( Transdermal opioids for cancer pain.
Skaer, TL, 2006
)
0.57
" To analyze possible interaction between these two drugs, a dose-response curve to fentanyl plus a fixed dose of R-(alpha)-methylhistamine (0."( Synergistic interaction between fentanyl and the histamine H3 receptor agonist R-(alpha)-methylhistamine, on the inhibition of nociception and plasma extravasation in mice.
Fernández, A; Fernández-Dueñas, V; Planas, E; Poveda, R; Puig, MM; Sánchez, S, 2006
)
0.84
" When switching of opioids is indicated to improve pain relief or reduce adverse events, equipotency dosage ratios are important."( Transdermal buprenorphine in cancer pain and palliative care.
Sittl, R, 2006
)
0.33
"Short-acting agents for neuromuscular block (NMB) require frequent dosing adjustments for individual patient's needs."( Model-based control of neuromuscular block using mivacurium: design and clinical verification.
Leibundgut, D; Pfister, CA; Schumacher, PM; Stadler, KS; Wirz, R; Zbinden, AM, 2006
)
0.33
" The magnitude of analgesia in the cold pressor model showed some correlation with TDF dosage and comparable effects for the full agonist fentanyl and the partial agonist buprenorphine."( Differential sensitivity of three experimental pain models in detecting the analgesic effects of transdermal fentanyl and buprenorphine.
Gasser, UE; Koltzenburg, M; Pokorny, R; Richarz, U, 2006
)
0.75
" In a previous study by our group, mean cohort and intraindividual dosage increases over an entire course of treatment and on a per-day basis were significantly lower with transdermal (TD) buprenorphine than with TD fentanyl."( Patterns of dosage changes with transdermal buprenorphine and transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of noncancer and cancer pain: a retrospective data analysis in Germany.
Nuijten, M; Poulsen Nautrup, B; Sittl, R, 2006
)
0.75
"The aim of this study was to compare TD buprenorphine and TD fentanyl with respect to dosage increases, dosage stability, and the nature of dosage changes."( Patterns of dosage changes with transdermal buprenorphine and transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of noncancer and cancer pain: a retrospective data analysis in Germany.
Nuijten, M; Poulsen Nautrup, B; Sittl, R, 2006
)
0.81
" To determine dosage stability, patients were classified based on the type of dosage change (stable, increase, alternating, or decrease) of the prescribed dosages."( Patterns of dosage changes with transdermal buprenorphine and transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of noncancer and cancer pain: a retrospective data analysis in Germany.
Nuijten, M; Poulsen Nautrup, B; Sittl, R, 2006
)
0.56
" Compared with TD buprenorphine, the proportion of patients with alternating dosage changes was significantly greater in patients receiving TD fentanyl (noncancer groups: 22."( Patterns of dosage changes with transdermal buprenorphine and transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of noncancer and cancer pain: a retrospective data analysis in Germany.
Nuijten, M; Poulsen Nautrup, B; Sittl, R, 2006
)
0.77
"In this retrospective data analysis, compared with TD buprenorphine, the increase in mean daily dosage was significantly greater in patients treated with TD fentanyl."( Patterns of dosage changes with transdermal buprenorphine and transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of noncancer and cancer pain: a retrospective data analysis in Germany.
Nuijten, M; Poulsen Nautrup, B; Sittl, R, 2006
)
0.76
" If these findings are applicable to humans, opiate dosing in children must be adjusted depending on history of recurrent hypoxemia to avoid respiratory depression."( Recurrent hypoxia in rats during development increases subsequent respiratory sensitivity to fentanyl.
Brown, KA; Laferrière, A; Moss, IR, 2006
)
0.55
"The safety and pharmacokinetics of fentanyl, delivered transdermally at a dosage of 60-67 microg/kg, were investigated in six healthy adult horses."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl delivered transdermally in healthy adult horses--variability among horses and its clinical implications.
Boston, RC; Kuersten, K; Moate, PJ; Orsini, JA; Soma, LR, 2006
)
0.93
"The total analgesic dosage and PCA dosage in the two groups were similar (P>0."( [Low-dose ketamine combined with fentanyl for intravenous postoperative analgesia in elderly patients].
Chen, YM; Liang, SW; Lin, CS, 2006
)
0.62
" Phase I-III trials have demonstrated an appropriate dosing range leading to effective analgesia, with minimal adverse effects."( Fentanyl HCl patient-controlled iontophoretic transdermal system for the management of acute postoperative pain.
Ferrone, M; Mayes, S, 2006
)
1.78
" Thus, it is not recommended to increase the lidocaine dosage during ECC."( Compartmental analysis of lidocaine kinetics during extracorporeal circulation.
Feo, L; Mezza, A; Monaco, C; Schiavello, R; Sciarra, M, 1988
)
0.27
"2% ropivacaine hydrochloride per hour with 10-mL bolus) epidural dosing groups."( Hemodynamic stability during labor and delivery with continuous epidural infusion.
Gerhardt, MA; Gunka, VB; Miller, RJ, 2006
)
0.33
"2% ropivacaine hydrochloride without bolus administration reduces the incidence of hypotension by 67% and is safer than traditional bolus dosing for routine labor."( Hemodynamic stability during labor and delivery with continuous epidural infusion.
Gerhardt, MA; Gunka, VB; Miller, RJ, 2006
)
0.33
" Primary end points were discontinuation or dosage reduction of other sedatives or fentanyl from the hour before to 6 hours after starting dexmedetomidine."( Adjunctive dexmedetomidine therapy in the intensive care unit: a retrospective assessment of impact on sedative and analgesic requirements, levels of sedation and analgesia, and ventilatory and hemodynamic parameters.
Forrest, LK; Kiser, TH; MacLaren, R, 2007
)
0.56
"Using a crossover design, the effects of the addition of ketamine to a previously determined optimal hand-injected immobilization dosage of carfentanil/xylazine were evaluated in 11 adult white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)."( Effects of ketamine on carfentanil and xylazine immobilization of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus).
Miller, KV; Osborn, DA; Ramsay, EC; Schumacher, J; Storms, TN, 2006
)
0.33
"5 microg/h matches the lower dosing requirements of cancer pain control in children."( Transdermal fentanyl in childhood and adolescence: a comprehensive literature review.
Anderson, B; Michel, E; Zernikow, B, 2007
)
0.72
" The 72-hour dosing schedule recommended by the manufacturers may not be applicable to children because of poor patch adhesiveness."( Transdermal fentanyl in childhood and adolescence: a comprehensive literature review.
Anderson, B; Michel, E; Zernikow, B, 2007
)
0.72
" Dose-response curves could only be drawn for swallowing and movement categories, and only the ED(50) could be predicted with certainty."( Fentanyl dose-response curves when inserting the LMA Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Critchley, LA; Khaw, KS; Lee, A; Ngan Kee, WD; Wong, CM, 2007
)
1.78
"In this prospective, randomized clinical study, we compared the performance of six inexperienced anaesthesiologists with <1 yr of training when using target- or manually controlled infusion of propofol, combined with manual dosing of fentanyl."( Use of a target-controlled infusion system for propofol does not improve subjective assessment of anaesthetic depth by inexperienced anaesthesiologists.
Baars, J; Hadzidiakos, D; Rehberg, B; Ryll, C, 2007
)
0.52
" Since no sex difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters of fentanyl were observed after intravenous administration in the present study, the sex difference of the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after subcutaneous administration may be explained by delayed distribution from the dosing site to the systemic circulation in female rats relative to male rats, which may be attributable to a higher content of subcutaneous fat in female rats."( Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in male and female rats after intravenous administration.
Fujita, K; Kobayashi, H; Ohtsuka, H, 2007
)
0.9
" Pain intensity (PI) (rated on an 11-point pain scale, from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain) and other outcomes were assessed before dosing and for 2 hours after dosing."( Fentanyl buccal tablet for the relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adult patients with chronic neuropathic pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Hale, M; Messina, J; Simpson, DM; Xie, F, 2007
)
1.78
" Six patients receiving TTS BU were switched to TTS FE and then rotated back to TTS BU with the same dosing considerations."( Switching from transdermal drugs: an observational "N of 1" study of fentanyl and buprenorphine.
Aielli, F; Casuccio, A; Ficorella, C; Fulfaro, F; Intravaia, G; Mangione, S; Mercadante, S; Porzio, G; Riina, S; Verna, L, 2007
)
0.57
" The average wholesale price per dosing unit of each drug during each period studied was obtained from internal databases."( Prescribing patterns and purchasing costs of long-acting opioids over nine years at an academic oncology hospital.
Arbuckle, R; Bruera, E; Curry, EA; Hung, F; Palla, S, 2007
)
0.34
" The opioids of choice have altered over recent years and the dosage regimens used can vary between institutions."( Survey of intrathecal opioid usage in the UK.
Aitkenhead, A; Bedforth, N; Giovannelli, M, 2008
)
0.35
"Lacking enough knowledge of pediatric cancer pain and pediatric dosage form of analgesics, current treatment of pediatric cancer pain in China is unsatisfactory."( [Feasibility to treat pediatric cancer pain with analgesics for adults and their efficacy].
Lin, H; Ling, JY; Luo, WB; Sun, XF; Xia, Y; Zhen, ZJ; Zheng, L, 2007
)
0.34
"Basing on the components and the endurable dosage of each component for children, we formulated the appropriate dosage and usage of a few analgesics (including sustained release tablets of morphine, oxycodone and transdermal fantanyl) available in China, most of which were used in adults."( [Feasibility to treat pediatric cancer pain with analgesics for adults and their efficacy].
Lin, H; Ling, JY; Luo, WB; Sun, XF; Xia, Y; Zhen, ZJ; Zheng, L, 2007
)
0.34
" The evolution in dosing of ITN warrants a re-examination of its usefulness in modern obstetric practice."( Single-dose intrathecal analgesia to control labour pain: is it a useful alternative to epidural analgesia?
Hammett, DC; Kelly, L; Minty, A; Minty, RG, 2007
)
0.34
" To reach an adequate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), the norepinephrine dosage was adapted successively."( Effects of fentanyl and S(+)-ketamine on cerebral hemodynamics, gastrointestinal motility, and need of vasopressors in patients with intracranial pathologies: a pilot study.
Bertsch, T; Horn, P; Muench, E; Quintel, M; Schmittner, MD; Vajkoczy, P; Vajkoczy, SL, 2007
)
0.73
"Group M: mean dosage of pethidine and midazolam 88."( Midazolam and pethidine versus propofol and fentanyl patient controlled sedation/analgesia for upper gastrointestinal tract ultrasound endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Agostoni, M; Arcidiacono, PG; Fanti, L; Gemma, M; Strini, G; Testoni, PA; Torri, G, 2007
)
0.6
" Pain intensity, relative dosing ratios, discontinuation rates, and adverse events were assessed."( The safety and efficacy of fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management: an analysis of pooled data from three randomized, active-controlled clinical studies.
Damaraju, CV; Hewitt, DJ; Kershaw, P; Siccardi, M; Viscusi, ER, 2007
)
0.64
"Although BIS became considerably appreciated, growing experience and repeated education had no impact on drug dosing and BIS levels."( Bispectral index monitoring: appreciated but does not affect drug dosing and hypnotic levels.
Brudin, L; Lindholm, ML; Sandin, RH, 2008
)
0.35
" Thirty-five patients were treated conventionally with increasing transdermal fentanyl dosage as required (group F) and 35 patients received oral tramadol added to their transdermal fentanyl before each increment of the transdermal opioid dosage (group T)."( Improved cancer pain treatment using combined fentanyl-TTS and tramadol.
Aloisio, L; Bajocco, C; Ciccozzi, A; Coaccioli, S; Colangeli, A; Marinangeli, F; Paladini, A; Varrassi, G, 2007
)
0.83
" Dosing of fentanyl, lorazepam, and propofol was recorded."( Clinical sedation scores as indicators of sedative and analgesic drug exposure in intensive care unit patients.
Canonico, AE; Dunn, J; Ely, EW; Girard, TD; Light, RW; Masica, AL; Nair, UB; Pandharipande, P; Shintani, AK; Thomason, JW; Truman Pun, B; Wilkinson, GR, 2007
)
0.73
" However, fentanyl concentration decreases quite rapidly and patients may need repeated dosing until analgesia is attained."( [Postoperative analgesia after remifentanil].
Kiyama, S, 2007
)
0.74
" Efficacy, adverse effects (AEs), dosing regimens, physician expertise and patient preference influence treatment selection."( Transdermal fentanyl improves pain control and functionality in patients with osteoarthritis: an open-label Canadian trial.
Camacho, F; Choquette, D; Horbay, GL; Husein-Bhabha, FA; Kelly, AJ; McCarthy, TG; Rodrigues, JF, 2008
)
0.72
" The dosage of anesthetic medications administered was also recorded for each patient."( Metoclopramide does not influence the frequency of propofol-induced spontaneous movements.
Ahmed, SA; Herazo, L; Iyer, C; Joshi, GP; Lenkovsky, F; Markin, V; Robertson, BD; Ross, L, 2007
)
0.34
"This study describes a pharmacodynamic model during general anaesthesia in children relating the bispectral index (BIS) response to the anaesthetic dosing of propofol, fentanyl, and remifentanil."( Pharmacodynamic modelling of the bispectral index response to propofol-based anaesthesia during general surgery in children.
Ammon, C; Fechner, J; Ihmsen, H; Jeleazcov, C; Schmidt, J; Schüttler, J; Schwilden, H, 2008
)
0.54
" Demographic data, time in ED, and dosage of each medication given were abstracted."( Inadequate provision of postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia in the ED.
Bonomo, JB; Butler, AS; Lindsell, CJ; Venkat, A, 2008
)
0.35
"The transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation has a certain analgesic effect in the operation and can reduce 17% Propofol dosage and 14% Fentany dosage, and it can decrease the skin-cutting-induced stress reaction of the cardiovascular system and accelerate waking."( [Analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation combined with target-controlled infusion in general anesthesia and effects on cardiovascular system].
He, BM; Yang, B, 2008
)
0.35
" However, no data exist to assess the dose-response characteristics of IT fentanyl when added to bupivacaine in infants."( Dose-response study of intrathecal fentanyl added to bupivacaine in infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic surgery.
Batra, YK; Lokesh, VC; Panda, NB; Rajeev, S; Rao, KL, 2008
)
0.85
" By pressing the dosing button a 40 microg dose of fentanyl is delivered over a 10 min period via iontophoresis through the intact skin."( [Postoperative pain management. Application of an iontophoretic patient-activated transdermal system].
Grond, S; Jage, J; Van Aken, H, 2008
)
0.6
" The two groups were evaluated for time of alertness and extubation in the intensive care unit, total analgesic dosage administered during the 24 hours after operation, arterial blood gas and peripheral saturation of oxygen before and after extubation."( Fast-track method in cardiac surgery: evaluation of risks and benefits of continuous administration technique.
Najafi, M, 2008
)
0.35
"6 mg/kg) and 24 h later fentanyl cumulative dose-response studies were conducted."( The analgesic efficacy of fentanyl: relationship to tolerance and mu-opioid receptor regulation.
Dighe, SV; Sirohi, S; Walker, EA; Yoburn, BC, 2008
)
0.95
" However, SEP monitoring can be done with sevoflurane inhalation, but the dosage should be adjusted due to interindividual variability."( Somatosensory evoked potentials by median nerve stimulation in children during thiopental/sevoflurane anesthesia and the additive effects of ketoprofen and fentanyl.
Hyvärinen, A; Kokki, H; Nieminen, K; Partanen, J; Westerén-Punnonen, S; Yppärilä-Wolters, H, 2008
)
0.54
"The present study was designed to show the effects of dexmedetomidine infusion with loading dosage on perioperative hemodynamics, propofol consumption, and postoperative recovery when used for general anesthesia in patients undergoing spinal laminectomy."( Dexmedetomidine-based versus fentanyl-based total intravenous anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy.
Altan, A; Gökkaya, S; Hatiboglu, MA; Turgut, N; Turkmen, A, 2008
)
0.64
" Signs of inadequate analgesia, defined as an increase in heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) 20% above the baseline, were managed by increasing or decreasing the dosage of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl."( Dexmedetomidine-based versus fentanyl-based total intravenous anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy.
Altan, A; Gökkaya, S; Hatiboglu, MA; Turgut, N; Turkmen, A, 2008
)
0.83
" Propofol-fentanyl medication requires a higher dosage of postoperative analgesics and causes frequent postoperative nausea and vomiting compared with propofol-dexmedetomidine."( Dexmedetomidine-based versus fentanyl-based total intravenous anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy.
Altan, A; Gökkaya, S; Hatiboglu, MA; Turgut, N; Turkmen, A, 2008
)
1.04
" In other pts, optimal dosage was found within 36 hours."( [Transdermal fentanyl: a new tool for pain therapy in pediatric oncology].
Cappelli, C; Clerico, A; Marucci, G; Reale, G,
)
0.5
" The total dosage of epidural fentanyl did not differ significantly between the groups."( [Retrospective evaluation of optimal doses of fentanyl by patient-controlled epidural analgesia in management of postoperative pain after gynecological surgery in the elderly].
Kanai, M; Kawagoe, I; Mitsuhata, H; Tajima, K, 2008
)
0.89
"One study in sedated patients demonstrated a reduction in pain score but not midazolam dosage when warm water infusion was used to manage colonic spasm."( Pilot feasibility study of the method of water infusion without air insufflation in sedated colonoscopy.
Leung, FW; Leung, JW; Mann, S; Salera, R; Toomsen, L, 2009
)
0.35
" To clarify contradictory findings, we simultaneously determined dose-response functions of the standard 5-HT(1A)-R-agonist 8-OH-DPAT and two different opioids for spontaneous ventilation and nociception."( The counteraction of opioid-induced ventilatory depression by the serotonin 1A-agonist 8-OH-DPAT does not antagonize antinociception in rats in situ and in vivo.
Dutschmann, M; Guenther, U; Hoeft, A; Manzke, T; Putensen, C; Wrigge, H; Zinserling, J, 2009
)
0.35
"(A) A dose-response relationship of 8-OH-DPAT, spontaneous phrenic nerve activity and a nociceptive C-fiber reflex (CFR) were established simultaneously in an in situ perfused, nonanesthetized, rat brainstem-spinal cord preparation."( The counteraction of opioid-induced ventilatory depression by the serotonin 1A-agonist 8-OH-DPAT does not antagonize antinociception in rats in situ and in vivo.
Dutschmann, M; Guenther, U; Hoeft, A; Manzke, T; Putensen, C; Wrigge, H; Zinserling, J, 2009
)
0.35
"Under the conditions of this study, we have shown that when phenylephrine or ephedrine were used to prevent post-spinal hypotension, the dosing requirement of hyperbaric bupivacaine was similar for intrathecal anaesthesia."( Effect of i.v. phenylephrine or ephedrine on the ED50 of intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl for caesarean section.
Barnes, J; Belavadi, P; Columb, MO; Hennebry, MC; Lyons, G; Stocks, GM; Wray, S, 2009
)
0.58
" The PS-based products at the most advanced stages of development are intranasal formulations containing opioid analgesics intended to provide rapid pain relief with simple and convenient dosing and minimal side effects."( PecSys: in situ gelling system for optimised nasal drug delivery.
Smith, A; Watts, P, 2009
)
0.35
") enhanced the ascending (3 mgxkg(-1)) and descending (30 mgxkg(-1)) portions of buprenorphine's dose-response curve, but only spinal, not supraspinal, nociceptin (10 nmolxL(-1)) enhanced buprenorphine anti-nociception."( Identification of an additional supraspinal component to the analgesic mechanism of action of buprenorphine.
Ding, Z; Raffa, RB, 2009
)
0.35
" The dosage used was 50% of that indicated in equipotency conversion tables."( Opioids switching with transdermal systems in chronic cancer pain.
Aurilio, C; Barbarisi, M; Grella, E; Pace, MC; Passavanti, MB; Pota, V; Sansone, P, 2009
)
0.35
"In conclusion, addition of low dose ketamine to propofol-fentanyl combination decreased the risk of desaturation and it also decreased the need for supplemental propofol dosage in pediatric patients at interventional radiology procedures."( Comparison of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-fentanyl-ketamine combination in pediatric patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures.
Akinci, SB; Aypar, U; Erden, IA; Koseoglu, A; Pamuk, AG, 2009
)
0.91
"To describe the differences in intraoperative opioid dosing and associated outcomes in children with and without cerebral palsy (CP)."( Intraoperative opioid dosing in children with and without cerebral palsy.
Koh, JL; Long, LS; Ved, S, 2009
)
0.35
" Patterns in intraoperative opioid dosing have yet to be studied in children with motor impairment (e."( Intraoperative opioid dosing in children with and without cerebral palsy.
Koh, JL; Long, LS; Ved, S, 2009
)
0.35
"Similar to prior research on children with cognitive impairment, a reduction in intraoperative opioid dosing was found in children with CP."( Intraoperative opioid dosing in children with and without cerebral palsy.
Koh, JL; Long, LS; Ved, S, 2009
)
0.35
" The finding that a sustained release profile could be obtained both in alcohol and after crushing of the pellets, shows that the ceramic carrier under investigation, at least to some extent, hampers dose dumping, and may thus be a promising material in future developments of new opioid containing oral dosage forms."( A ceramic drug delivery vehicle for oral administration of highly potent opioids.
Bredenberg, S; Engqvist, H; Forsgren, J; Jämstorp, E; Strømme, M, 2010
)
0.36
" The fentanyl was used systematically during induction at the dosage of 5 microg/kg."( [Prevention of the acute tolerence with fentanyl by ketamine].
Diatta, B; Khalil, Y; Ndiaye, M; Ndoye Diop, M; Niang, B; Seck, M; Wade, A; Wade, KH, 2008
)
1.13
"OTFC at a dosage of 200 microg is an effective and convenient analgesic for use in peripheral retinal scatter photocoagulation."( Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate: a novel analgesic agent for use in retinal photocoagulation.
Aboud, A; Clark, DI; Hillier, RJ; Thind, G,
)
0.47
" A few cases have been reported where a prescribed ascension in transdermal fentanyl dosing triggered respiratory depression."( Bioequivalence criteria for transdermal fentanyl generics: do these need a relook?
Felden, L; Lötsch, J; Walter, C, 2009
)
0.85
" In the future, identifying SNPs might give us information to modulate the analgesic dosage of opioid individually for better pain control."( [Postoperative pain management following orthognathic surgery in consideration of individual differences--is the antinociceptive effect of fentanyl related to the genotype involving nucleotide at OPRM1?].
Fukuda, K; Hayashida, M; Ikeda, K, 2009
)
0.56
"5-mg/kg dosing regimen was well tolerated and effective for sedation during colonoscopy and was associated with higher rates of sedation success, memory retention, and physician satisfaction than the fospropofol 2-mg/kg dose."( A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of fospropofol disodium for sedation during colonoscopy.
Cattau, E; Cohen, LB; Goetsch, A; Kline, JM; Rex, DK; Shah, A; Weber, JR,
)
0.13
" There was no difference in the dosage of fentanyl, VAS, or the incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting between the two groups (P>0."( [Application of a narcotrend-assisted anesthesia in-depth monitor in the microwave coagulation for liver cancer during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl].
Huang, W; Lai, JL; Lai, RC; Lu, YL; Wang, XD; Xie, JD; Xu, MX, 2010
)
0.82
"For patients with liver cancer, monitoring the depth of anesthesia with Narcotrend on microwave coagulation can contribute to lower dosage of propofol and shorten duration of recovery during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl."( [Application of a narcotrend-assisted anesthesia in-depth monitor in the microwave coagulation for liver cancer during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl].
Huang, W; Lai, JL; Lai, RC; Lu, YL; Wang, XD; Xie, JD; Xu, MX, 2010
)
0.74
"The time and the dosage of etomidate necessary to loss consciousness were greater in group F ((70."( Peri-intubation hemodynamic changes during low dose fentanyl, remifentanil and sufentanil combined with etomidate for anesthetic induction.
Sun, L; Zhang, GH, 2009
)
0.6
" Subjects were dosed under naltrexone blockade on four occasions with three nasal sprays (100 microg in 100 microl) and OTFC 200 microg."( Pharmacokinetic comparisons of three nasal fentanyl formulations; pectin, chitosan and chitosan-poloxamer 188.
Fisher, A; Knight, A; Smith, A; Watling, M, 2010
)
0.62
" A probit analysis design was used in which success/failure rates of different doses of fentanyl were measured and dose-response curves drawn from which the ED50 and ED95 with 95% confidence intervals were determined."( Fentanyl dosage and timing when inserting the laryngeal mask airway.
Critchley, LA; Gin, T; Khaw, KS; Lee, A; Ngan Kee, WD; Wong, TH, 2010
)
2.03
" Group 1 patients were given fentanyl at a dosage of one microg/kg; Group 2 patients received two microg/kg of fentanyl."( The frequency of fentanyl-induced cough in children and its effects on tracheal intubation.
Han, JI; Kim, CH; Lee, GY; Lee, H, 2010
)
0.99
" To determine the dosing frequency of sustained-release opioids (morphine, oxycodone, and transdermal fentanyl) and the prevalence of end-of-dose failure in clinical practice, a patient-reported survey was performed."( The dosing frequency of sustained-release opioids and the prevalence of end-of-dose failure in cancer pain control: a Korean multicenter study.
Ahn, JS; Kim, DY; Kim, SY; Ryoo, BY; Shin, DB; Song, HS; Yim, CY, 2010
)
0.58
"8% of these patients took medication earlier than the prescribed dosing schedule."( The dosing frequency of sustained-release opioids and the prevalence of end-of-dose failure in cancer pain control: a Korean multicenter study.
Ahn, JS; Kim, DY; Kim, SY; Ryoo, BY; Shin, DB; Song, HS; Yim, CY, 2010
)
0.36
" End-of-dose failure is suggested to explain increased dosing frequency, and patients reported that adequate pain relief lasted for less time than was stated in the manufacturers' prescription recommendation."( The dosing frequency of sustained-release opioids and the prevalence of end-of-dose failure in cancer pain control: a Korean multicenter study.
Ahn, JS; Kim, DY; Kim, SY; Ryoo, BY; Shin, DB; Song, HS; Yim, CY, 2010
)
0.36
" Main outcomes recorded were dosage of lidocaine administered and amount of conscious sedation (midazolam and fentanyl) administered for pain management."( A review of physician anaesthesia prescribing practices in an abortion clinic in British Columbia.
Fitzsimmons, BP; Hodgson, ZG; MacKay-Dunn, MH; Mo, D, 2010
)
0.57
"Fentanyl buccal soluble film effectively delivers a high percentage of the administered fentanyl dose and nearly identical plasma profiles are obtained when equivalent doses are delivered by single or multiple dosage units."( Single-dose pharmacokinetics of fentanyl buccal soluble film.
Finn, AL; Gever, LN; Tagarro, I; Vasisht, N, 2010
)
2.09
" 33 patients in terminal stage of carcinoma, who had been treated by transdermal fentanyl due to their excruciating pain (7-10 mark on numerical scale) with initial dosage of 25 microg as a strong opiate analgesic, were monitored within the time period of 10 days."( Treatment of severe cancer pain by transdermal fentanyl.
Husić, S; Ljuca, D, 2010
)
0.84
"Isoflurane provides protection against myocardial damage in a clinically used dosage as documented by lower levels of troponin-T in patients undergoing OPCAB surgery."( Myocardial protection with isoflurane during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized trial.
Dutta, D; Garg, M; Minhas, H; Tempe, DK; Tomar, A; Virmani, S, 2011
)
0.37
" On the basis of rapid, smooth, and successful inductions and recoveries, the described dosage of thiafentanil and medetomidine, with administration of midazolam prior to recovery, is recommended for immobilization of adult emus."( Use of thiafentanil-medetomidine for the induction of anesthesia in emus (Dromaius novaehollandiae) within a wild animal park.
Cushing, A; McClean, M, 2010
)
0.36
" We show that the opioid Fentanyl, and its structurally similar sedative Zolpidem, can be embedded into metakaolin based geopolymer pellets to provide prolonged release dosage forms with mechanical strengths of the same order of magnitude as that of human teeth."( Mechanically strong geopolymers offer new possibilities in treatment of chronic pain.
Bredenberg, S; Engqvist, H; Forsgren, J; Jämstorp, E; Strømme, M, 2010
)
0.66
" In both (placebo and morphine pellets), dose-response curves for M, FEN and TRM, individually and combined were obtained, and the doses that produced 50% inhibition (ED(50)) were determined."( Antinociceptive effects of morphine, fentanyl, tramadol and their combination, in morphine-tolerant mice.
Miranda, HF; Puig, MM; Romero, A, 2010
)
0.63
" Detailed data concerning the dosage of PSA medications, adverse events, and ED times for patients requiring PSA for treatment of fractures, reductions of joint dislocations, and cardioversion for atrial fibrillation were collected."( Procedural sedation and analgesia in a Canadian ED: a time-in-motion study.
Anstett, D; Bawden, J; Bond, K; Boyko, D; Fabris, G; Fassbender, K; Rowe, BH; Singh, M; Villa-Roel, C, 2011
)
0.37
"a Continuous infusion of ketorolac provided effective analgesia after operation in children who underwent ureteroneocystostomy as well as a low dosage of fentanyl."( Ketorolac or fentanyl continuous infusion for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing ureteroneocystostomy.
Choi, EK; Hong, JY; Jo, YY; Kil, HK, 2011
)
0.94
"16, opioid-naïve subjects were dosed on five separate visits under naltrexone block."( Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray 100 - 800 µg in healthy volunteers.
Fisher, A; Knight, A; Smith, A; Watling, M, 2010
)
0.62
"Of 139 recruited patients, 69% identified an effective dose of sublingual fentanyl ODT (a dosage that successfully treated all episodes of BTcP over two consecutive days) and entered the maintenance phase, during which they were treated for a median of 149."( Long-term effectiveness and tolerability of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain.
Derrick, R; Dumble, S; Hassman, D; Howell, J; Nalamachu, S; Wallace, MS, 2011
)
0.85
" Plasma fentanyl reached steady state within the 72-hour dosing period and accumulation was approximately 2-fold."( Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of ascending doses of sublingual fentanyl, with and without naltrexone, in Japanese subjects.
Boyce, M; Eriksson, C; Kilborn, J; Lister, N; Tamaoka, M; Warrington, S, 2011
)
1.03
" Interestingly, drug dosage reduction permitted to reduce the incidence of possible adverse effects, namely exploratory activity and motor coordination, thus it was demonstrated that it improved the benefit/risk profile of such treatment."( Fentanyl-trazodone-paracetamol triple drug combination: multimodal analgesia in a mouse model of visceral pain.
Ciruela, F; Fernández, A; Fernández-Dueñas, V; Planas, E; Poveda, R; Sánchez, S, 2011
)
1.81
"An increased dosage of propofol is frequently administered to reduce responses to insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA)."( Increased dosage of propofol in anesthesia induction cannot control the patient's responses to insertion of a laryngeal mask airway.
Kanazawa, M; Murata, T; Nitta, M; Suzuki, T, 2006
)
0.33
" This dose-response study suggests that doses of intrathecal bupivacaine less than 10 mg may not adequately ensure successful intraoperative anesthesia."( ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal bupivacaine in morbidly obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery.
Atkinson Ralls, L; Carvalho, B; Collins, J; Drover, DR; Riley, ET, 2011
)
0.37
" In the switching study DDD indicated a reduction in analgesic dosing and OMEQ an increase when switching from WHO step II to III."( Choosing the unit of measurement counts: the use of oral morphine equivalents in studies of opioid consumption is a useful addition to defined daily doses.
Borchgrevink, P; Dale, O; Fredheim, O; Hamunen, K; Mellbye, A; Svendsen, K, 2011
)
0.37
"OMEQ reflects clinical dosing better than DDD, and can give additional insight into opioid consumption when combined with DDD."( Choosing the unit of measurement counts: the use of oral morphine equivalents in studies of opioid consumption is a useful addition to defined daily doses.
Borchgrevink, P; Dale, O; Fredheim, O; Hamunen, K; Mellbye, A; Svendsen, K, 2011
)
0.37
"Dose titration of the 1-day formulation was accomplished in a short period in patients with cancer pain who had been previously untreated with opioid analgesics; the efficacy of the formulation for pain control after repeated dosing was comparable to that of the 3-day formulation, and its tolerability was good."( [Double-blind parallel-group dose-titration study comparing a fentanyl-containing patch formulated for 1-day application for the treatment of cancer pain with Durotep MT Patch].
Hanaoka, K; Sakata, H; Tomioka, T; Yoshimura, T, 2011
)
0.61
" A standardized anesthesia protocol for monitoring consisted of a titrated propofol drip combined with bolus dosing of fentanyl or sufentanil."( Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials in very young children.
Curry, DJ; Dauser, RC; Fulkerson, DH; Jea, A; Luerssen, TG; Riviello, JJ; Satyan, KB; Stayer, SA; Whitehead, WE; Wilder, LM, 2011
)
0.58
" Close examination of the existing trials assessing these newer transmucosal preparations reveals significant variation in many study parameters, such as patient selection criteria, severity of breakthrough pain episodes, proportions of patients with a neuropathic pain component, titration protocols, choice of the primary endpoints, protocols for repeat dosing and rescue medication, the separation of treated episodes and the extent of the placebo response, all of which may have affected efficacy results."( Newer generation fentanyl transmucosal products for breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant cancer patients.
Elsner, F; Porta-Sales, J; Tagarro, I; Zeppetella, G, 2011
)
0.71
" The dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine was decided by using the up-and-down method with an initial dose of 9 mg and dosing change of 1 mg."( ED50 of hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl for cesarean delivery under combined spinal epidural in normotensive and preeclamptic patients.
Kakkar, A; Kumar, S; Salhotra, R; Sethi, AK; Tyagi, A,
)
0.41
" Physicians should keep in mind that epidural fentanyl could cause the nystagmus as a neurological complication even though it is used within conventional dosage ranges, although this is very rare."( Nystagmus caused by epidural fentanyl.
Kim, H; Lee, DK; Lee, JY; Lee, MK; Lim, BG, 2012
)
0.93
" The primary outcome was the dosage of local anesthetic that was used."( Obstetric outcomes and maternal satisfaction in nulliparous women using patient-controlled epidural analgesia.
Haydon, ML; Larson, D; Nageotte, MP; Preslicka, CW; Reed, E; Shrivastava, VK, 2011
)
0.37
" These findings prompt us to place optimal dosing guidelines so as to avoid overdosing and thus delay recovery and help to get the excellent outcome of the surgery."( Vecuronium and fentanyl requirement in abdominal surgery under combined epidural-general anaesthesia and general anaesthesia alone.
Ahmed, A; Hoq, MF; Hossain, M; Huda, MR; Rahman, MM; Rahman, MS; Yeasmeen, S, 2012
)
0.73
"The optimal dosage of the 3-day-type transdermal fentanyl patch was determined by titration of short-acting oral oxycodone."( [Three-day-type transdermal fentanyl patch conversion by rapid titration method with short-acting oral oxycodone for cancer pain].
Fujio, N; Ishikawa, N; Kameyama, M; Watanabe, H; Yamazaki, K, 2012
)
0.93
" The propofol dosing was adjusted to keep BIS level between 40 and 60."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.
Bieda, K; Bienert, A; Grześkowiak, E; Hartmann-Sobczyńska, R; Kaliszan, R; Malatyńska, M; Marcinkowska, A; Sobczyński, P; Wiczling, P, 2012
)
0.38
"We investigated the safety and efficacy of the bilateral periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) at a reduced dosage in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA)."( Use of reduced-dose periarticular injection for pain management in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
Chang, CB; Jeon, YT; Kang, YG; Kim, TK; Koh, IJ; Song, J, 2012
)
0.38
"Using models of respiratory compromise, loss of response to esophageal instrumentation, and loss of responsiveness, the authors explored through simulation published dosing schemes for endoscopy using propofol alone and in combination with selected opioids."( A simulation study of common propofol and propofol-opioid dosing regimens for upper endoscopy: implications on the time course of recovery.
Egan, TD; Johnson, KB; LaPierre, CD; Randall, BR, 2012
)
0.38
"Four published dosing regimens of propofol alone or in combination with opioids were used to predict the probability of loss of response to esophageal instrumentation for a 10-min procedure and the probability of respiratory compromise and return of responsiveness once the procedure had ended."( A simulation study of common propofol and propofol-opioid dosing regimens for upper endoscopy: implications on the time course of recovery.
Egan, TD; Johnson, KB; LaPierre, CD; Randall, BR, 2012
)
0.38
" Serial jugular venous blood samples were collected at 0 (predosing), 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 144, 168, 240, 336, 408, and 504 h after dosing and assayed for plasma fentanyl concentration."( Pharmacokinetics and dose selection of a novel, long-acting transdermal fentanyl solution in healthy laboratory Beagles.
Clark, TP; Freise, KJ; Newbound, GC; Owens, JG; Riggs, KL; Savides, MC, 2012
)
0.8
" This long-acting fentanyl formulation provides veterinarians with a novel, registered option for the control of postoperative pain in dogs that improves dosing compliance and potentially mitigates the disadvantages of oral, parenteral, and patch delivered opioids."( The effectiveness of a long-acting transdermal fentanyl solution compared to buprenorphine for the control of postoperative pain in dogs in a randomized, multicentered clinical study.
Clark, TP; Freise, KJ; Linton, DD; Newbound, GC; Wilson, MG, 2012
)
0.97
"The Food and Drug Administration approved a single shared Risk Evaluation Mitigation Strategy (REMS) for transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl dosage forms in December 2011."( Shared risk evaluation mitigation strategy for all immediate-release transmucosal fentanyl dosage forms.
, 2012
)
0.81
" MOPr agonist efficacy was evaluated by microinjecting the irreversible opioid receptor antagonist β-funaltrexamine hydrochloride (β-FNA) into the vlPAG prior to a dose-response analysis of morphine and fentanyl antinociception."( Differential development of antinociceptive tolerance to morphine and fentanyl is not linked to efficacy in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray of the rat.
Bobeck, EN; Haseman, RA; Hong, D; Ingram, SL; Morgan, MM, 2012
)
0.8
"The objective was to develop a population PK model for fentanyl in volunteers and patients following INFS administration, to evaluate the influence of potential covariates and to simulate the exposure of fentanyl after repeated dosing in cancer patients."( Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of intranasal fentanyl spray as a means to enrich pharmacokinetic information for patients with cancer breakthrough pain.
Facius, A; Kaessner, N; Lahu, G; Nave, R; Roepcke, S, 2012
)
0.87
" The model enhances the understanding of fentanyl PK after INFS dosing in cancer patients with BTP, a population for whom real-life data would be very hard to obtain."( Population pharmacokinetic meta-analysis of intranasal fentanyl spray as a means to enrich pharmacokinetic information for patients with cancer breakthrough pain.
Facius, A; Kaessner, N; Lahu, G; Nave, R; Roepcke, S, 2012
)
0.89
" Our analysis suggests a relationship between total patch dosage and mean postmortem fentanyl concentration up to the 100-μg/h dose."( Reliability of postmortem fentanyl concentrations in determining the cause of death.
Gill, JR; Lin, PT; Nelson, L, 2013
)
0.91
"For full compatibility groups (age, ASA status and anthropometric data, equal operation duration and the equipotential drug dosage adjustment is revealed, that in group of propofol-fentanyl TIVA in the early postoperative period in school age children postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is developing, which in case of absence of the corresponding correction is maintained after 1 month after operation (at least) in 80% of cases."( [Correction of early cognitive disorders in school-age children operated under total intravenous anaesthesia].
Gus'kov, IE; Lobov, MA; Lugovoĭ, AV; Miatchin, PS; Ovezov, AM; Panteleeva, MV,
)
0.32
" However, the optimal dosing regimen remains unclear."( Closed-loop double-vasopressor automated system to treat hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a preliminary study.
Sia, AT; Sng, BL; Tan, HS, 2012
)
0.38
" Owing to the medication's delivery system, the pharmacokinetics and subsequent dosing are unique to this product and should not be interchanged with any other proprietary or compounded fentanyl product."( Fentanyl pectin nasal spray: a novel intranasal delivery method for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain.
Bulloch, MN; Hutchison, AM, 2013
)
2.02
" Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperational pulmonary hypertension, duration of the surgery or cardiopulmonary bypass, and dosage of fentanyl used during the surgery were independent predictors for immediate extubation."( Determinants of immediate extubation in the operating room after total thoracoscopic closure of congenital heart defects.
Cai, XZ; Gao, XJ; Ma, LL; Ma, ZS; Wang, LX; Yu, AL; Zhang, ZW, 2013
)
0.59
" Preoperational pulmonary hypertension, duration of the surgery, and the dosage of fentanyl used for UFTA were the determining factors for immediate extubation."( Determinants of immediate extubation in the operating room after total thoracoscopic closure of congenital heart defects.
Cai, XZ; Gao, XJ; Ma, LL; Ma, ZS; Wang, LX; Yu, AL; Zhang, ZW, 2013
)
0.61
" Various retrospective studies comparing dosage changes of buprenorphine and fentanyl patches in persistent pain patients have been completed; however, no long-term prospective, randomized, clinical study has compared the effectiveness of these patches."( A feasibility study of transdermal buprenorphine versus transdermal fentanyl in the long-term management of persistent non-cancer pain.
Chowdhury, S; Mitra, F; Shelley, M; Williams, G, 2013
)
0.85
" Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings in order to determine adequate local anaesthetic dosing for thoracic epidural analgesia in obese patients."( Postoperative epidural analgesia in obese patients undergoing liver resection surgery.
Bellamy, M; Biercamp, C; Hudson-Phillips, S; Kocarev, M; Milan, Z; Pane, H; Procter, H; Rajasekar, N; Simpson, R, 2013
)
0.39
" placebo in the first 30 minutes after dosing (FBT provided an 83% probability of superior pain relief, ODT 66%, and OTFC 73% vs."( Efficacy of rapid-onset oral fentanyl formulations vs. oral morphine for cancer-related breakthrough pain: a meta-analysis of comparative trials.
Bennett, MI; Fullarton, JR; Jandhyala, R, 2013
)
0.68
" Based on dosage equivalency conversion, equal doses of fentanyl and meperidine were used."( Impact of fentanyl in lieu of meperidine on endoscopy unit efficiency: a prospective comparative study in patients undergoing EGD.
Crowell, MD; Dzeletovic, I; Gurudu, SR; Harris, LA; Harrison, ME; Heigh, RI; Leighton, JA; Pasha, SF; Ramirez, FC; Yows, CR, 2013
)
1.04
" Opioid dosage was indicative of syndrome severity and correlated with other physiological parameters measured."( Long-term analysis of Irukandji stings in Far North Queensland.
Carrette, TJ; Seymour, JJ, 2013
)
0.39
" Initial dosage regimens in this population are often empirically derived from adults on a body weight basis."( A predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of fentanyl for analgesia/sedation in neonates based on a semi-physiologic approach.
Calvo, R; Encinas, E; Lukas, JC; Rodriguez, M; Suarez, E; Vozmediano, V, 2013
)
0.64
"Integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling showed that the usually prescribed dosage regimens of fentanyl in neonates may not always provide the optimum degree of sedation."( A predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of fentanyl for analgesia/sedation in neonates based on a semi-physiologic approach.
Calvo, R; Encinas, E; Lukas, JC; Rodriguez, M; Suarez, E; Vozmediano, V, 2013
)
0.85
"This prospective randomized single-blinded study was conducted to determine whether there were differences in consumption, demand dosing and postoperative analgesia quality between PCEA using ropivacaine and levobupivacaine."( The effectiveness of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.165% with fentanyl 2.0 miroc g/ml or levobupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2.0 micro g/ml as a method of postoperative analgesia after major orthopaedic surgery.
Misiran, KB; Yahaya, LS, 2013
)
0.61
" Dosage of analgesic medication consumption was retrieved from patients' charts."( Combined spinal and general anesthesia vs general anesthesia for robotic sacrocervicopexy: a randomized controlled trial.
Awad, N; Lowenstein, L; Mustafa, S; Nasir, H; Segal, D, 2014
)
0.4
" Dosing proportional to basic opioid regimen is now proposed as an alternative to dose titration."( Treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: to titrate or to proportionate?
Hans, GH, 2013
)
0.39
"To determine the dosing patterns and total doses of fentanyl, lorazepam, and haloperidol according to nursing shift in a cohort of older patients in a medical intensive care unit."( Patterns of opiate, benzodiazepine, and antipsychotic drug dosing in older patients in a medical intensive care unit.
Akgün, KM; Araujo, KL; Bramley, K; Murphy, TE; Pisani, MA; Vest, MT, 2013
)
0.64
" Although dosing with fentanyl did not differ according to shift, doses of both lorazepam and haloperidol were higher during the evening shifts (4 pm to midnight) than during the day or night shifts."( Patterns of opiate, benzodiazepine, and antipsychotic drug dosing in older patients in a medical intensive care unit.
Akgün, KM; Araujo, KL; Bramley, K; Murphy, TE; Pisani, MA; Vest, MT, 2013
)
0.7
" Eighty per cent of patients were not asked about their ability to swallow solid, oral dosage forms by their physician."( Challenges of treating patients with chronic pain with dysphagia (CPD): physician and patient perspectives.
Carlson, DR; Kopecky, EA; Nalamachu, S; Pergolizzi, JV; Raffa, RB; Taylor, R; Varanasi, RK, 2014
)
0.4
"A proportion of patients with chronic pain have dysphagia and cannot swallow solid, oral dosage forms, which creates a serious treatment challenge for pain specialists and other healthcare providers."( Challenges of treating patients with chronic pain with dysphagia (CPD): physician and patient perspectives.
Carlson, DR; Kopecky, EA; Nalamachu, S; Pergolizzi, JV; Raffa, RB; Taylor, R; Varanasi, RK, 2014
)
0.4
" Each patient's demographic and clinical characteristics, the need for ventilatory support, the use and dosage of medications, the number of nursing staff per bed, the time elapsed from admission to the intensive care unit until the effective start of enteral feeding, and the causes for nonadministration were recorded."( Nurse to bed ratio and nutrition support in critically ill patients.
Azevedo, LC; Bafi, AT; Castro, I; Freitas, FG; Honda, CK; Machado, FR; Mazza, BF; Nascente, AP; Stanich, P, 2013
)
0.39
" Conclusion Achievement of daily calorie goals was inadequate, and the main factors associated with this failure were the use and dosage of midazolam and the number of nurses available."( Nurse to bed ratio and nutrition support in critically ill patients.
Azevedo, LC; Bafi, AT; Castro, I; Freitas, FG; Honda, CK; Machado, FR; Mazza, BF; Nascente, AP; Stanich, P, 2013
)
0.39
" Postoperative apnea was rationalized as follows; tardy respiratory depression with the epidural administration, and unexpected dosage of the residual fentanyl in the catheter."( [A case of tracheal intubation for apnea with epidural opioid in recovery room after operation under general anesthesia].
Ouchi, K; Sugiyama, K; Uno, H, 2013
)
0.59
"Our model predicts that even with maximal clinical dosing regimens of epidural fentanyl over 24 h, ritonavir-induced cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition is unlikely to produce plasma fentanyl concentrations associated with a decrease in minute ventilation."( Effect of ritonavir-induced cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition on plasma fentanyl concentrations during patient-controlled epidural labor analgesia: a pharmacokinetic simulation.
Avram, MJ; Cambic, CR; Gupta, DK; Wong, CA, 2014
)
0.86
" Dose-response curves for individual drugs were fitted to a hyperbolic dose-response model using nonlinear regression."( Synergistic interaction between fentanyl and bupivacaine given intrathecally for labor analgesia.
Khaw, KS; Lee, A; Ng, FF; Ng, KK; Ngan Kee, WD; So, R, 2014
)
0.69
"The derived dose-response models for individual drugs (doses in micrograms) at 15 min were: Effect = 100 × dose / (13."( Synergistic interaction between fentanyl and bupivacaine given intrathecally for labor analgesia.
Khaw, KS; Lee, A; Ng, FF; Ng, KK; Ngan Kee, WD; So, R, 2014
)
0.69
" Despite heterogeneity between trials, clonidine premedication in an adequate dosage (4 µg/kg) was likely to have a beneficial effect on postoperative pain in children."( Clonidine premedication for postoperative analgesia in children.
Cyna, AM; Knight, N; Lambert, P; Middleton, P, 2014
)
0.4
"To evaluate the effect and safety of propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) with a small dosage of fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of the third impacted molar tooth."( [Evaluation of propofol target controlled infusion with fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth].
Guan, M; Liu, Y; Wang, EB; Zhang, W, 2014
)
0.86
"Propofol TCI with a small dosage of fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth is effective and safe."( [Evaluation of propofol target controlled infusion with fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth].
Guan, M; Liu, Y; Wang, EB; Zhang, W, 2014
)
0.92
"A "reliable degree of sedation" was observed up to T = 210-240 min, consistent with the selected dosing regimen and the observed fentanyl plasma levels."( Evaluation of fentanyl disposition and effects in newborn piglets as an experimental model for human neonates.
Encinas, E; Lukas, JC; Mielgo, V; Rey-Santano, C; Suárez, E; Valls-I-Soler, A; Vozmediano, V, 2014
)
0.97
"In this study we compared the effect of 2 enantiomers; namely racemic preparation of bupivacaine with pure formulation of its levorotatory form levobupivacaine on the dosage requirements for general anesthesia propofol in a series of 273 patients admitted to hospital of China for nephrectomy."( The effect of L-bupivacaine on BIS levels in the maintenance doses of propofol and fentanyl during general anesthesia in Chinese people.
Cai, M; Li, X, 2014
)
0.63
" For constipation, M6G, fentanyl and buprenorphine were full agonists, oxycodone was a partial agonist, morphine produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 were inactive."( In vivo profiling of seven common opioids for antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression: no two opioids have the same profile.
Kuo, A; Meutermans, W; Smith, MT; Wyse, BD, 2015
)
0.72
" The primary outcome was improvement in PID during the first 60 min after dosing (15-60 min)."( Various formulations of oral transmucosal fentanyl for breakthrough cancer pain: an indirect mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.
Fullarton, J; Jandhyala, R, 2012
)
0.64
" The median intraoperative fentanyl equivalents dosage was 10."( A retrospective analysis of the effect of intraoperative opioid dose on cancer recurrence after non-small cell lung cancer resection.
Cata, JP; Engle, M; Feng, L; Gottumukkala, V; Keerty, D; Keerty, V; Mehran, JR; Norman, PH, 2014
)
0.7
" The objective of this study was to observe whether the dosing time of 6 narcotic analgesics in mice affected their efficacy, pain tolerance and recovery of tolerance."( Chronopharmacology of analgesic effect and tolerance induced by six narcotic analgesics in mice.
Chang, MJ; Jin, JJ; Li, XP; Liu, D; Luo, L; Xu, YJ; Yu, ZQ; Zhang, CL, 2015
)
0.42
" The best dosage of this drug for postoperative analgesia remains to be elucidated."( [Efficacy and safety of remifentanil-based regimen for postoperative pain management in abdominal surgery patients: a double-blind study with low-dose remifentanil infusion of 0.02 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)].
Hirano, H; Kaida, T; Machino, A; Nagasaka, Y; Shirasaki, R; Wakamatsu, M, 2014
)
0.4
" The dosage for anesthesia maintenance, recovery time of awareness, extubation time, incidences of nausea, vomiting and chill and irritation of urethral catheters were observed and recorded."( [Effects of assisted-electroacupuncture on recovery of fast tracking anesthesia in mPCNL].
Chen, YH; Lin, CQ; Luo, FR; Ou, JY; Xie, LC; Yan, J; Yang, YB; Zhang, CZ; Zhang, SL; Zhong, SQ, 2014
)
0.4
"The assisted-electroacupuncture anesthesia could reduce the dosage of remifentanil and sevoflurane in mPCNL fast tracking anesthesia in urinary surgery, reduce the incidences of nausea, vomiting, chill and irritation of urethral catheters during recovery stage, and prompt recovery of mPCNL patients."( [Effects of assisted-electroacupuncture on recovery of fast tracking anesthesia in mPCNL].
Chen, YH; Lin, CQ; Luo, FR; Ou, JY; Xie, LC; Yan, J; Yang, YB; Zhang, CZ; Zhang, SL; Zhong, SQ, 2014
)
0.4
" fentanyl dosing schedule in foals aged 5-13 days and describe selected, associated dose- and time-related behavioural and physiological responses to plasma fentanyl concentration."( Disposition, behavioural and physiological effects of escalating doses of intravenously administered fentanyl to young foals.
Casbeer, HC; Knych, HK; Mitchell, MM; Steffey, EP, 2015
)
1.54
" Our objective was to evaluate the impact of CPOE implementation on analgesic prescribing and dosing practices for renal colic presentations."( Computerized physician order entry and decision support improves ED analgesic ordering for renal colic.
Lang, E; Lonergan, K; McRae, A; Netherton, SJ; Wang, D, 2014
)
0.4
" The dosage of propofol needed for induction, consumption during maintenance and recovery time were recorded."( Impact of malnutrition on propofol consumption and recovery time among patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.
Bu, H; Fan, Y; Gao, F; Manyande, A; Tian, X; Tian, Y; Xiang, Y; Yang, H, 2014
)
0.4
"The present results indicate that the dosage and recovery time of propofol does change in malnourished individuals."( Impact of malnutrition on propofol consumption and recovery time among patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.
Bu, H; Fan, Y; Gao, F; Manyande, A; Tian, X; Tian, Y; Xiang, Y; Yang, H, 2014
)
0.4
" Although the recommended dosing interval is 72 hours, many references discuss the use of 48-hour intervals in select patients, and no published reference recommends dosing intervals shorter than 48 hours."( Daily application of transdermal fentanyl patches in patients receiving hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
Pawasauskas, J; Perdrizet, G, 2014
)
0.68
"These findings highlight the importance of titrating the dose of fentanyl sublingual spray to optimize dosing for individual patients."( Lack of correlation between the effective dose of fentanyl sublingual spray for breakthrough cancer pain and the around-the-clock opioid dose.
Dillaha, L; Nalamachu, SR; Parikh, N; Rauck, R,
)
0.62
" These dosage forms offer overlapping yet distinct pharmacokinetic advantages to allow more choices for physicians and patients in the management of breakthrough cancer pain."( Clinical and pharmacokinetic considerations of novel formulations of fentanyl for breakthrough cancer pain.
Chen, C; Gupta, A, 2014
)
0.64
" The average Ramsay score, the frequency of propofol, the highest score of NRS, the total dosage of fentanyl and recovery time were compared."( [Sedative effects of dexmedetomidine in post-operative elder patients on mechanical ventilation].
Huang, F; Jin, J; Kong, J; Liu, S; Wang, J; Xu, H; Yang, X, 2014
)
0.62
"05), the total dosage of fentanyl significantly decreased (427."( [Sedative effects of dexmedetomidine in post-operative elder patients on mechanical ventilation].
Huang, F; Jin, J; Kong, J; Liu, S; Wang, J; Xu, H; Yang, X, 2014
)
0.71
" The aim of this study was to characterize fentanyl pharmacokinetics in pregnant sheep after intravenous and transdermal dosing during surgical procedure performed to ewe and foetus."( Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics in Pregnant Sheep after Intravenous and Transdermal Administration to the Ewe.
Acharya, G; Erkinaro, T; Haapala, L; Haapsamo, M; Hautajärvi, H; Heikkinen, AT; Heikkinen, EM; Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Laaksonen, S; Räsänen, J; Voipio, HM, 2015
)
2.12
" The modification of propofol dosage in the group of patients under study is not necessary when TCI-guided administration of propofol by means of the Schnider model is used."( Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in cancer patients undergoing major lung surgery.
Bienert, A; Grześkowiak, E; Kaliszan, R; Kut, K; Plenzler, E; Przybyłowski, K; Szczesny, D; Tyczka, J; Wiczling, P, 2015
)
0.42
" Clinically fentanyl dosage adjustments may become necessary when ketoconazole or other strong CYP3A inhibitors are given simultaneously."( Pharmacokinetic interaction of intravenous fentanyl with ketoconazole.
Haefeli, WE; König, SK; Mahlke, NS; Mikus, G; Skopp, G; Ziesenitz, VC, 2015
)
1.06
" Since then, the fentanyl dosage has been gradually increased."( [A case of recurrent colon cancer with improvement in prognosis and cancer pain after surgical intervention].
Fujisaki, S; Sakurai, K; Takashina, M; Takayama, T; Tomita, R, 2014
)
0.74
" Except for benzodiazepines, which were dosed higher in women than men, equal doses of sedation were given to female and male patients."( Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.
Childers, RE; Sonnenberg, A; Williams, JL, 2015
)
0.42
"To evaluate the effects of different dosing intervals on multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, and safety and tolerability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS)."( Effect of dosing interval on pharmacokinetics of fentanyl pectin nasal spray from a crossover study.
Bujanover, S; Chen, C; Gupta, A,
)
0.59
" In addition to comparison of dosing between the groups, associations between total body weight (TBW), BMI, and lean body mass (LBM) values and doses of DEX (mcg/h), between BMI and various indices (i."( THE EFFECT OF OBESITY ON DOSE OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE WHEN ADMINISTERED WITH FENTANYL DURING POSTOPERATIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION--RETROSPECTIVE.
Hakozaki, T; Hosono, A; Imaizumi, T; Iseki, Y; Isosu, T; Mogami, M; Morimoto, I; Murakawa, M; Nakano, Y; Obara, S; Oishi, R, 2015
)
0.65
" After institutional ethics committee approval, 26 pigs were randomly allocated to receive either 20 μg/kg fentanyl (n = 10; fentanyl group) administered 5 min before five doses of adrenaline (20 μg/kg), equivalent-volume saline (n = 10; saline group) using the same adrenaline dosing protocol, or neither fentanyl nor adrenaline (n = 6; sham group)."( Myocardial protection induced by fentanyl in pigs exposed to high-dose adrenaline.
Caldini, EG; Carmona, MJ; da Luz, VF; Damaceno-Rodrigues, NR; Gonzalez, MM; Malbouisson, LM; Negri, EM; Otsuki, DA; Vane, MF; Viana, BG, 2015
)
0.91
"This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DEX) in the diminution of fentanyl dosage in pediatric cardiac surgery based on some clinical and biochemical parameters."( Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine in the diminution of fentanyl dosage in pediatric cardiac surgery.
Li, Y; Sun, Y; Wang, X; Xia, Y; Ye, H; Yuan, X, 2017
)
0.92
"Fifty pediatric patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists II), 1-6 years old, were randomly allocated into two groups: group F (control group), in which patients received normal saline and high dosage of fentanyl (30 μg/kg), and group D, in which patients were given DEX and low dosage of fentanyl (15 μg/kg)."( Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine in the diminution of fentanyl dosage in pediatric cardiac surgery.
Li, Y; Sun, Y; Wang, X; Xia, Y; Ye, H; Yuan, X, 2017
)
0.89
"The results indicated that low dosage of fentanyl supplemented with DEX almost had the same anesthesia effects and inflammation extent compared with high dose of fentanyl, which suggested that infusion DEX might decrease fentanyl consumption in pediatric cardiac surgery."( Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine in the diminution of fentanyl dosage in pediatric cardiac surgery.
Li, Y; Sun, Y; Wang, X; Xia, Y; Ye, H; Yuan, X, 2017
)
0.97
" Differences exist between TIRFs regarding formulation design and dosing to treat BTCP."( Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl for Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Opportunities and Challenges for Use in Palliative Care.
Atayee, RS; Chang, A; Ma, JD; Revta, C; Roeland, EJ, 2015
)
0.7
" There were statistically significant differences between new and experienced providers in the distribution of responses for survey items regarding how the importance of treating pain in children was learned, overall comfort with pediatric patients, receiving negative responses from superiors about giving pediatric patients analgesics, and usefulness of the Broselow tape for dosing fentanyl for children."( An Assessment of Newly Identified Barriers to and Enablers for Prehospital Pediatric Pain Management.
Cushman, JT; Jones, CMC; Li, T; Shah, MN; Whitley, DE; Williams, DM, 2017
)
0.62
"In this study, fentanyl pharmacokinetics during critical illness were strongly influenced by severe liver disease, congestive heart failure, and weight, factors that should be considered when dosing fentanyl in the ICU."( Population Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl in the Critically Ill.
Choi, L; Ely, EW; Ferrell, BA; Girard, TD; Heltsley, R; Pandharipande, PP; Stein, CM; Vasilevskis, EE, 2016
)
1.07
" A separate dose-response experiment showed that the serototoxic effect of fentanyl was dose-dependent."( Effects of fentanyl on serotonin syndrome-like behaviors in rats.
Kaminaga, S; Kawano, T; Kitamura, S; Locatelli, FM; Tateiwa, H; Yamanaka, D; Yokoyama, M, 2016
)
1.05
" Acetylfentanyl can be managed effectively with naloxone, although higher than conventional dosing may be required to achieve therapeutic effect."( Acetylfentanyl: An Emerging Drug of Abuse.
Hoot, NR; Rehrer, SJ; Rogers, JS, 2016
)
1.37
" Compared with the alcohol and control groups, the opioid group used a statistically higher mean medication dosage to achieve sedation."( Chronic Opioid Users Are More Difficult to Sedate than Alcoholics and Controls.
Clayton, S; Gill, J; Patel, R; Quintero, E, 2015
)
0.42
" Thus, the authors investigated the effect of fentanyl dosing on pain perception and central sensitization in healthy volunteers using established pain models."( Does Fentanyl Lead to Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia in Healthy Volunteers?: A Double-blind, Randomized, Crossover Trial.
Bandschapp, O; Dolder, P; Filitz, J; Mauermann, E; Rentsch, KM; Ruppen, W, 2016
)
1.21
"One of the key issues in the treatment of pain is to choose the appropriate route and dosage form of analgesics for each individual patient in pain."( [Understanding Oral and Nasal Mucosal Absorption of Fentanyl, and Rectal Absorption of Buprenorphine].
Kato, Y; Kubota, Y; Shimoyama, M; Shimoyama, N, 2015
)
0.67
"The pharmacokinetics of the sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet appear to be negatively affected by the presence of salivary gland hypofunction, although the moistening of the oral cavity before dosing results in a pharmacokinetic profile similar to that seen with the giving of pilocarpine hydrochloride."( The Influence of Low Salivary Flow Rates on the Absorption of a Sublingual Fentanyl Citrate Formulation for Breakthrough Cancer Pain.
Buchanan, A; Davies, A; Mundin, G; Vriens, J; Waghorn, M; Webber, K, 2016
)
0.93
"Bolus dosing of fentanyl and midazolam fails to reduce the intracranial hypertension burden when administered for episodic intracranial hypertension."( Fentanyl and Midazolam Are Ineffective in Reducing Episodic Intracranial Hypertension in Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.
Doctor, A; Kharasch, ED; Leonard, JR; Pineda, JA; Wallendorf, MJ; Welch, TP, 2016
)
2.22
" Opioids were not dosed in an equipotent manner."( The Changing Use of Intravenous Opioids in an Emergency Department.
Albertson, TE; Chenoweth, JA; Clarke, SO; Gutierrez, R; Roche, BM; Sutter, ME; Wintemute, GJ, 2015
)
0.42
" The JCAHO program likely was at least indirectly responsible for this change in relative dosing of the opioids."( The Changing Use of Intravenous Opioids in an Emergency Department.
Albertson, TE; Chenoweth, JA; Clarke, SO; Gutierrez, R; Roche, BM; Sutter, ME; Wintemute, GJ, 2015
)
0.42
" Pharmacokinetic model-based dosing schemes can quantitatively describe the time course of drug effects and achieve optimal drug therapy."( Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of a Pharmacokinetic Model-Based Dosing Scheme Versus a Conventional Fentanyl Dosing Regimen For Patient-Controlled Analgesia Immediately Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Clinical Tria
Chin, JH; Hwang, JH; Jin, SJ; Kim, YK; Kwon, YJ; Lim, HS; Park, SU; Yi, JM, 2016
)
0.65
"Administration of sedatives according to simulating circadian time could decrease the duration of mechanical ventilation, extubation time, and the length of ICU stay, decrease the dosage of sedative drugs, and reduce the incidence of delirium."( [Study of prevention and control of delirium in ventilated patients by simulating blockage of circadian rhythm with sedative in intensive care unit].
Dong, C; Feng, F; Li, J; Qi, Y; Song, R; Yang, J; Yang, Z; Zhang, H, 2016
)
0.43
"We measured fentanyl concentrations in plasma from leftover clinically-obtained specimens in 130 paediatric cardiac surgery patients and successfully generated a PK dataset using drug dosing data extracted from electronic medical records."( Pragmatic pharmacology: population pharmacokinetic analysis of fentanyl using remnant samples from children after cardiac surgery.
Beck, C; Caprioli, RM; Choi, L; Crum, K; Hachey, B; Kannankeril, PJ; Marshall, MD; Owen, J; Smith, AH; Van Driest, SL; Woodworth, A, 2016
)
1.05
" In simulation studies, model-driven weight-adjusted per kg fentanyl dosing led to more consistent therapeutic fentanyl concentrations than fixed per kg dosing."( Pragmatic pharmacology: population pharmacokinetic analysis of fentanyl using remnant samples from children after cardiac surgery.
Beck, C; Caprioli, RM; Choi, L; Crum, K; Hachey, B; Kannankeril, PJ; Marshall, MD; Owen, J; Smith, AH; Van Driest, SL; Woodworth, A, 2016
)
0.92
"We show here that population PK modelling using sparse remnant samples and electronic medical records data provides a powerful tool for assessment of drug kinetics and generation of individualized dosing regimens."( Pragmatic pharmacology: population pharmacokinetic analysis of fentanyl using remnant samples from children after cardiac surgery.
Beck, C; Caprioli, RM; Choi, L; Crum, K; Hachey, B; Kannankeril, PJ; Marshall, MD; Owen, J; Smith, AH; Van Driest, SL; Woodworth, A, 2016
)
0.67
" Nonetheless, careful deliberation is necessary because of the slow effects and difficulty with dosage adjustment."( [Use of Transdermal Fentanyl in a Hospital].
Kikuchi, N; Sako, A; Watanabe, A; Yoshida, S; Yoshikawa, Y, 2016
)
0.76
"Preoperatively, 95% of the patients received morphine versus 100% postoperatively, with a median dosage of 10."( Infants Operated on for Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Towards Evidence-Based Pain Guidelines.
Keyzer-Dekker, CM; Knibbe, CA; Meesters, NJ; Simons, SH; Tibboel, D; van Dijk, M, 2016
)
0.43
" These patients required higher dosing and prolonged infusions of naloxone."( Fatal Fentanyl: One Pill Can Kill.
Adams, AJ; Albertson, TE; Black, HB; Chenoweth, JA; Colby, DK; Davis, MT; Ford, JB; Gerona, RR; Owen, KP; Roche, BM; Sutter, ME, 2017
)
0.94
" The total dosage of used propofol was also recorded."( A comparison between the effects of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-ketamine for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outside the operating room.
Akhondzadeh, R; Ghomeishi, A; Nesioonpour, S; Nourizade, S, 2016
)
0.69
" It is necessary to pay attention to the correct dosage and to the half life of these drugs, that results prolonged in the chronic renal insufficiency."( [Nonconvulsive status epilepticus due to Fentanyl intoxication in hemodialysed patients: two case reports and review of the literature].
Caretta, E; Farfaglia, P; Figliola, C; Jovane, C; Laudi, C; Pogliani, D; Pozzi, A; Rimoldi, L; Sogni, E; Zarcone, D,
)
0.4
" Multiple pairwise comparisons were conducted using Welch t tests for continuous variables to determine whether dosing was different for the older groups vs the younger group; separate analyses were performed within and across ASA-PS class."( Does intravenous induction dosing among patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgical procedures follow current recommendations: a study of contemporary practice.
Akhtar, S; Burg, MM; Dai, F; Heng, J; Liu, J; Schonberger, RB, 2016
)
0.43
"No significant decrease in dosing between age groups was observed for fentanyl and midazolam."( Does intravenous induction dosing among patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgical procedures follow current recommendations: a study of contemporary practice.
Akhtar, S; Burg, MM; Dai, F; Heng, J; Liu, J; Schonberger, RB, 2016
)
0.67
"Weight-adjusted anesthetic induction dosing, age-associated differences in dosing by ASA-PS (American Society of Anesthesiology-Physical Status), and hemodynamic outcomes between younger (18-64 years, n = 537) and older (≥65 years, n = 231) female patients were analyzed."( A Retrospective Observational Study of Anesthetic Induction Dosing Practices in Female Elderly Surgical Patients: Are We Overdosing Older Patients?
Akhtar, S; Burg, MM; Dai, F; Heng, J; Schonberger, RB, 2016
)
0.43
" Sedative and analgesic dosing was not clinically significantly higher in obese patients than in non-obese patients."( Sedation for Bronchoscopy and Complications in Obese Patients.
Bellinger, CR; Chatterjee, AB; Haponik, E; Khan, I, 2016
)
0.43
" Spinal, epidural and intravenous fentanyl has been studied in pregnant women and neonates, but foetal safety of fentanyl dosing with transdermal patch during pregnancy and labour is not sufficiently studied."( Foetal Fentanyl Exposure and Ion Trapping after Intravenous and Transdermal Administration to the Ewe.
Heikkinen, A; Heikkinen, EM; Kokki, H; Kokki, M; Ranta, VP; Räsänen, J; Voipio, HM, 2017
)
1.19
" This study investigated the patterns of opioid prescribing and characterized the dosing and duration of opioid use in patients with noncancer and cancer pain."( Dose and Duration of Opioid Use in Patients with Cancer and Noncancer Pain at an Outpatient Hospital Setting in Malaysia.
Choy, LW; Ismail, CR; Rahman, NA; Zin, CS, 2017
)
0.46
" We hypothesized that there is an optimal desflurane-fentanyl dosing regimen that can provide a faster and more predictable wake-up time, while also ensuring adequate analgesia during wake-up testing."( A desflurane and fentanyl dosing regimen for wake-up testing during scoliosis surgery: Implications for the time-course of emergence from anesthesia.
Chen, PT; Liou, JY; Teng, WN; Ting, CK; Tsou, MY; Westenskow, DR; Yu, L, 2017
)
1.04
" Fentanyl and ketorolac dose-response relationships were evaluated for selected outcome variables."( Intramuscular Fentanyl and Ketorolac Associated with Superior Pain Control After Pediatric Bilateral Myringotomy and Tube Placement Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Cook-Sather, SD; Jantzen, EC; Jawad, AF; Li, Y; Long, AS; Muhly, WT; Polansky, M; Stricker, PA, 2017
)
1.73
" The temperature of the abdominal skin surface was assessed before dosing and at 10, 20, and 60 minutes after dosing."( Effect of Modulated Electrohyperthermia on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Transmucosal Fentanyl Citrate in Healthy Volunteers.
Kim, MG; Lee, SY, 2016
)
0.66
" OTFC can be administered without limitations in combination with mEHT, and it is not necessary to modify the dosing regimen."( Effect of Modulated Electrohyperthermia on the Pharmacokinetics of Oral Transmucosal Fentanyl Citrate in Healthy Volunteers.
Kim, MG; Lee, SY, 2016
)
0.66
"FBT at the initial 200 μg dosage was well-tolerated and effective as a BTP management strategy in Korean cancer patients."( Initial titration with 200 μg fentanyl buccal tablets: a retrospective safety analysis in Korean cancer patients.
Cho, HN; Koo, DH; Kwon, MY; Lee, SS; Lee, YG; Oh, S, 2018
)
0.77
" Although fentanyl is a commonly used narcotic during surgery, there are no pharmacokinetic (PK) data available for optimal dosing of fentanyl in adolescents with clinically severe obesity."( Use of Fentanyl in Adolescents with Clinically Severe Obesity Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Pilot Study.
Bachmann, R; Mikus, G; Mushtaq, A; Skopp, G; van den Anker, JN; Vaughns, JD; Weiss, J; Williams, EF; Ziesenitz, VC, 2017
)
1.31
" With the exception of a higher body mass index in the CWIS group, the other variables, such as the dosage and usage time of fentanyl citrate, use of additional painkillers, and side effects, including wound complications, did not differ between groups."( Continuous wound infiltration system for postoperative pain management in gynecologic oncology patients.
Ahn, S; Kim, K; Kim, YB; Lee, B; No, JH; Shin, HJ; Suh, DH, 2017
)
0.66
" This literature review reveals that variants in ABCB1, OPRM1, and COMT have been replicated for opioid dosing and variants in ABCB1 have been replicated for both treatment response and adverse effects."( Pharmacogenomics and Patient Treatment Parameters to Opioid Treatment in Chronic Pain: A Focus on Morphine, Oxycodone, Tramadol, and Fentanyl.
Hall, C; Hotham, E; Lloyd, RA; Suppiah, V; Williams, M, 2017
)
0.66
" Approximately 35% of decedents filled an opioid prescription within 90 days of death; of these, one-third had a mean daily dosage greater than 100 morphine milligram equivalents (MME/day)."( Increase in Drug Overdose Deaths Involving Fentanyl-Rhode Island, January 2012-March 2014.
Bohm, MK; Mercado, MC; Spelke, MB; Stanley, C; Sugerman, DE; Sumner, SA, 2018
)
0.74
"In a retrospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy, we found that compared with titrated administration of sedative, bolus dosing improves endoscopy unit efficiency and safety and decreases the amount of sedative required."( Bolus Administration of Fentanyl and Midazolam for Colonoscopy Increases Endoscopy Unit Efficiency and Safety Compared With Titrated Sedation.
Boyd, A; Finn, RT; Gellad, ZF; Lin, L, 2017
)
0.76
" ABCB1 genotype has been previously associated with patient opioid requirements and may influence fentanyl dosing requirements in critically ill children."( ABCB1 genotype is associated with fentanyl requirements in critically ill children.
Au, AK; Clark, RSB; Conley, YP; Empey, PE; Horvat, CM; Kochanek, PM; Li, L; Poloyac, SM, 2017
)
0.95
" In particular, we compared the occurrence of complications and the dosage of administered sedative drugs between the groups."( Analogosedation during flexible bronchoscopy using a combination of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl - A retrospective analysis.
Cornelissen, CG; Dreher, M; Krüger, S; Müller, T; Thümmel, K, 2017
)
0.68
" The dosage of midazolam was lower in the MFP compared to the MF or MP group (MFP vs."( Analogosedation during flexible bronchoscopy using a combination of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl - A retrospective analysis.
Cornelissen, CG; Dreher, M; Krüger, S; Müller, T; Thümmel, K, 2017
)
0.68
"In summary we were able to demonstrate that triple sedation can safely be administered during flexible bronchoscopy and is associated with a reduced dosage of midazolam and propofol."( Analogosedation during flexible bronchoscopy using a combination of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl - A retrospective analysis.
Cornelissen, CG; Dreher, M; Krüger, S; Müller, T; Thümmel, K, 2017
)
0.68
"Balanced anesthesia allows for a reduced dosage of each component, while inducing general anesthesia of sufficient depth with potentially fewer side effects."( Premedication with fentanyl-midazolam improves sevoflurane anesthesia for surgical intervention in laboratory mice.
Arras, M; Cesarovic, N; Jirkof, P; Lipiski, M, 2017
)
0.78
" Five studies and guidelines also suggest that oral opioids (not including TIRF products) be dosed proportionally to baseline opioids at 10%-20% of the 24-hour, around-the-clock dose."( Breakthrough Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review of Pharmacologic Management
.
Brant, JM; Gallagher, E; Rodgers, BB; Sundaramurthi, T, 2017
)
0.46
"The relationship between initial fentanyl infusion dosage and time to goal sedation in nonobese and obese critically ill children was examined."( Relationship between rate of fentanyl infusion and time to achieve sedation in nonobese and obese critically ill children.
Golding, CL; Johnson, PN; Miller, JL; Owora, AH; Skrepnek, GH; Thomas, AN, 2017
)
1.03
" The primary outcomes of the study included the time to goal sedation and fentanyl dosage characteristics (i."( Relationship between rate of fentanyl infusion and time to achieve sedation in nonobese and obese critically ill children.
Golding, CL; Johnson, PN; Miller, JL; Owora, AH; Skrepnek, GH; Thomas, AN, 2017
)
0.98
" Among nonobese children, every 10-μg/hr increase in initial fentanyl dosage was associated with a 19% lower probability of achieving goal sedation at any point in time."( Relationship between rate of fentanyl infusion and time to achieve sedation in nonobese and obese critically ill children.
Golding, CL; Johnson, PN; Miller, JL; Owora, AH; Skrepnek, GH; Thomas, AN, 2017
)
0.99
" Dosing occurred following a 10-h fast, with fasting continuing for 4 h post-dose."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of fentanyl sublingual spray and fentanyl citrate intravenous: a single ascending dose study in opioid-naïve healthy volunteers.
Koch, C; Nalamachu, S; Oh, DA; Parikh, N; Rauck, R; Singla, N; Vetticaden, S; Yu, J, 2017
)
0.74
" All three studies utilized a validated patient EOC questionnaire which consists of 23 items grouped into seven subscales (confidence with device, comfort with device, movement, dosing confidence, pain control, knowledge/understanding, and satisfaction)."( Meta-Analysis of the Ease of Care From a Patients' Perspective Comparing Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System Versus Morphine Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Postoperative Pain Management.
Danesi, H; Ding, L; Jones, JB; Lindley, P, 2017
)
0.69
" Five of the seven subscales (confidence with device, comfort with device, movement, dosing confidence, and knowledge/understanding) on the patient EOC questionnaire showed a statistically significant advantage for fentanyl ITS versus morphine IV PCA."( Meta-Analysis of the Ease of Care From a Patients' Perspective Comparing Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System Versus Morphine Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Postoperative Pain Management.
Danesi, H; Ding, L; Jones, JB; Lindley, P, 2017
)
0.87
" There was no difference in pain score reduction; however, repeat dosing was less frequent for patients receiving INF (16% vs."( Intranasal Fentanyl and Quality of Pediatric Acute Care.
Adelgais, KM; Brent, A; Deakyne, S; Massanari, D; Sills, MR; Tong, S; Wathen, J, 2017
)
0.84
" Propofol was initially infused as a slow bolus of 2-4 mg/kg and then continuously during the entire procedure, at 4 mg/kg/hour, increasing the dosage to 6 mg/kg/hour if sedation was not achieved."( Propofol and fentanyl sedation for laser treatment of retinopathy of prematurity to avoid intubation.
Auriti, C; Bersani, I; Capolupo, I; Catena, G; Di Ciommo, V; Di Pede, A; Dotta, A; Lipreri, A; Lozzi, S; Piersigilli, F; Sgrò, S, 2019
)
0.88
"No published studies have looked at the dosing and use of rapid onset fentanyl preparations in children."( The use of rapid onset fentanyl in children and young people for breakthrough cancer pain.
Anderson, AK; Burke, K; Coombes, L, 2017
)
1
"Sedation during flexible bronchoscopy is desirable, but the drugs and the dosage protocols that are used vary."( Comparison of midazolam with fentanyl-midazolam combination during flexible bronchoscopy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Chogtu, B; Magazine, R; Prabhudev, AM,
)
0.42
"Drug dosing in infants frequently depends on body weight as a crude indicator for maturation."( Drug metabolism in early infancy: opioids as an illustration.
Allegaert, K; Mian, P; Tibboel, D; Van Den Anker, J; Van Donge, T, 2018
)
0.48
"The objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of an algorithm for abortion intravenous sedation dosing (AAID) to standard dosing during first-trimester surgical abortion."( A randomized comparison of intravenous sedation using a dosing algorithm compared to standard care during first-trimester surgical abortion.
Braaten, KP; Fortin, J; Goldberg, AB; Maurer, R; Urman, RD, 2018
)
0.48
"This was a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial in which women undergoing first-trimester surgical abortion received fentanyl and midazolam dosed per either an algorithm or clinic standard."( A randomized comparison of intravenous sedation using a dosing algorithm compared to standard care during first-trimester surgical abortion.
Braaten, KP; Fortin, J; Goldberg, AB; Maurer, R; Urman, RD, 2018
)
0.69
" There are advantages and disadvantages in using these 2 opioids which are discussed, and potential dosing strategies are outlined."( What Parenteral Opioids to Use in Face of Shortages of Morphine, Hydromorphone, and Fentanyl.
Behm, B; Davis, MP; Fernandez, C; McPherson, ML; Mehta, Z, 2018
)
0.71
" Patients who failed to achieve adequate sedation in any arm were rescued with midazolam dosed at the investigator's discretion."( A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Barish, CF; Bernstein, D; Bhandari, R; Cash, BD; DeMicco, MP; Desta, T; Etzkorn, K; Pruitt, R; Quirk, D; Rex, DK; Schaeffer, C; Sullivan, S; Tiongco, F, 2018
)
0.48
" In major inpatient surgery, intraoperative single-dose methadone produces better analgesia and reduces opioid use compared with conventional repeated dosing of short-duration opioids."( Intraoperative Methadone in Same-Day Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Dose-Finding Pilot Study.
Blood, J; Brunt, LM; Deych, E; Kharasch, ED; Komen, H, 2019
)
0.51
"15 mg/kg ideal body weight) or conventional as-needed dosing of short-duration opioids (eg, fentanyl, hydromorphone; controls)."( Intraoperative Methadone in Same-Day Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Dose-Finding Pilot Study.
Blood, J; Brunt, LM; Deych, E; Kharasch, ED; Komen, H, 2019
)
0.73
"Experimental, dose-response study."( Dose-dependent effects of isoflurane and dobutamine on cardiovascular function in dogs with experimental mitral regurgitation.
Goya, S; Hirao, D; Shimada, K; Tanaka, R; Wada, T, 2018
)
0.48
" With multiple doses, systemic exposure increased relative to the first dose; shorter dosing intervals resulted in higher concentrations."( Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl Sublingual Spray in Opioid-Naïve Participants: Results of a Phase 1, Multiple Ascending Dose Study.
James, S; Koch, C; Nalamachu, S; Oh, DA; Parikh, N; Rauck, RL; Singla, N; Yu, J, 2018
)
0.8
"Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is commonly attributed to opioid analgesics; consequently, perioperative opioid dosage reduction is a common practice."( The impact of preinduction fentanyl dosing strategy on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Choudhary, P; Chugh, PT; Dutta, A; Panday, BC; Sethi, N; Sood, J,
)
0.43
"We show that PCS is non-inferior to RCS in terms of dosage given and degree of sedation."( Randomized and controlled study comparing patient controlled and radiologist controlled intra-procedural conscious sedation, using midazolam and fentanyl, for patients undergoing insertion of a central venous line.
Clements, W; Goh, GS; Joseph, T; Kavnoudias, H; Koukounaras, J; Sneddon, D; Snow, T, 2018
)
0.68
" TIRF use was mainly related to background opioid dosage and the patient's self-sufficiency in taking medication."( Breakthrough cancer pain tailored treatment: which factors influence the medication choice? An observational, prospective and cross-sectional study in patients with terminal cancer.
Calvieri, A; Casale, G; Dardeli, A; Eusepi, G; Giannarelli, D; Magnani, C; Mastroianni, C; Restuccia, MR, 2018
)
0.48
"5 K: the standard dosage of ketamine (0."( [Evaluation of Anesthesia Method to Minimize Intraoperative Body Movement and Respiratory Depression for Dilatation and Curettage A Retrospective Study].
Kitamura, J; Yamaguchi, S, 2016
)
0.43
"To analyse the effects of combined acupuncture anesthesia on surgical dosage and serum interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-10 (IL-10) of pneumonectomy patients."( Effect of Combined Acupuncture Anesthesia on Surgical Dosage and Serum IL-4, IL-10 of Pneumonectomy Patients.
Shi, X; Xie, D; Zhang, Y, 2018
)
0.48
" Acute opioid tolerance would be developed by higher concentration of remifentanil than dosage of common anesthetic practice."( High-dose intraoperative remifentanil infusion increases early postoperative analgesic consumption: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study.
Jeong, W; Kim, D; Kim, MJ; Ko, S; Lim, HS, 2018
)
0.48
" The purpose of this study is to identify the proportion of new FTS users who had evidence of prior opioid tolerance, by dosage strength, in FDA's Sentinel System."( Assessment of prior opioid tolerance among new users of fentanyl transdermal system in FDA's Sentinel System.
Cocoros, NM; Ju, J; Kornegay, C; Larochelle, MR; Petrone, AB; Popovic, J; Racoosin, JA, 2019
)
0.76
" We assessed the proportion of users with prior tolerance stratified by dosage strength of FTS using four definitions of opioid tolerance: ≥30-mg oxycodone equivalents/day in each of 7 consecutive days immediately prior to index; ≥30-mg oxycodone equivalents/day for any 7 days in the 30 days prior to index (secondary); any dose in each of 7 days in the 7 consecutive days immediately prior to index (tertiary); and any dose for any 7 days in the 30 days prior to index (quaternary)."( Assessment of prior opioid tolerance among new users of fentanyl transdermal system in FDA's Sentinel System.
Cocoros, NM; Ju, J; Kornegay, C; Larochelle, MR; Petrone, AB; Popovic, J; Racoosin, JA, 2019
)
0.76
" The duration of propofol infusion and total dosage of propofol were recorded as well."( Impact of CYP3A4*1G Polymorphism on Fentanyl Analgesia Assessed by Analgesia Nociception Index in Chinese Patients Undergoing Hysteroscopy.
An, HY; Ding, N; E, W; Feng, Y; Gao, L; Su, Y; Wang, Y; Yan, Q; Zhang, HY, 2018
)
0.76
" Vaccination with F-sKLH shifted the dose-response curves to the right for both fentanyl-induced antinociception and respiratory depression."( A Fentanyl Vaccine Alters Fentanyl Distribution and Protects against Fentanyl-Induced Effects in Mice and Rats.
Baruffaldi, F; Harmon, TM; Le Naour, M; Pentel, PR; Peterson, SJ; Pravetoni, M; Raleigh, MD; Vigliaturo, JR, 2019
)
1.46
" Because of its strong analgesic activity and dosage form, fentanyl has become one of the first choices for severe and moderate pain in clinical practice."( Comparison of the use of different analgesics in the course of anesthesia care based on pharmacoeconomics.
Jing, C; Ping, Y; Qing, J, 2018
)
0.72
" Mean initial buprenophine dosage did not differ between groups."( Impact of Fentanyl Use on Buprenorphine Treatment Retention and Opioid Abstinence.
Chang, Y; Flood, J; Metlay, J; Regan, S; Rigotti, N; Wakeman, SE; Yu, L,
)
0.53
" Vital signs before and after dosing were not significantly different."( Intranasal midazolam and fentanyl for procedural sedation and analgesia in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Bidegain, M; Cotten, CM; Fisher, K; Goldberg, RN; Greenberg, RG; Hornik, CD; Ku, LC; Simmons, C; Smith, PB, 2019
)
0.82
"Simply reducing the number of prescriptions may not be effective in reducing prescription related mortality; although opioid prescription dosing information should be made available to engender a better evaluation of the epidemic."( Geographic patterns of prescription opioids and opioid overdose deaths in New York State, 2013-2015.
Labriola, J; Meliker, JR; Romeiser, JL, 2019
)
0.51
" To ensure patient safety, ambulance personnel are therefore provided with treatment protocols with dosing restrictions, however, with the concomitant risk of insufficient pain treatment of the patients."( Prehospital intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel: a cluster-randomised comparison of two treatment protocols.
Christensen, EF; Friesgaard, KD; Giebner, M; Kirkegaard, H; Nikolajsen, L; Rasmussen, CH, 2019
)
0.82
" Wilcoxon non-paired signed rank test was used to examine the change in fentanyl dosage and IV:IT conversion ratio."( Conversion of Intrathecal Opioids to Fentanyl in Chronic Pain Patients With Implantable Pain Pumps: A Retrospective Study.
Kim, DD; Patel, A; Sibai, N, 2019
)
1.02
" A decision analytic model based on the hospital's perspective was constructed to follow possible consequences of the initial dosing of analgesia, before potential titration."( Clinical and Economic Analysis of Morphine Versus Fentanyl in Managing Ventilated Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome in the Intensive Care Setting.
AbouNahia, F; Abushanab, D; Al-Badriyeh, D; Alsoukhni, O, 2019
)
0.77
" With utility of these PK/PD models we created an algorithm to optimize the intraoperative dosing regimen."( Optimizing intraoperative administration of propofol, remifentanil, and fentanyl through pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations to increase the postoperative duration of analgesia.
Johnson, K; Syroid, N; Tams, C; Vasilopoulos, T, 2019
)
0.75
" It is a single-strength tablet housed in a single-dose applicator (which may minimize the likelihood of dosing errors) and is strictly for use in medically supervised/monitored settings."( Sufentanil 30 µg Sublingual Tablet: A Review in Acute Pain.
Deeks, ED, 2019
)
0.51
" A strong consensus was achieved regarding which pharmacological treatment (transmucosal fentanyl) and dosing method (start low and go slow) are the most suitable for the older population."( Expert consensus on the management of breakthrough cancer pain in older patients. A Delphi study.
Alarcón, MDL; Cabezón-Gutiérrez, L; Estévez, FV; Jiménez-López, AJ; Martín-Arroyo, JMT; Padrós, MC; Rebollo, MA; Sanz-Yagüe, A, 2019
)
0.74
" Predictors of poorer neurocognitive function were midazolam dosage >3 mg (P<0."( Comparison of the Effects of Midazolam/Fentanyl, Midazolam/Propofol, and Midazolam/Fentanyl/Propofol on Cognitive Function After Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Riordan, S; Seck, V; Thompson, R; Wong, S, 2019
)
0.78
"The medical condition and baseline opioid requirements must all be carefully considered when dosing a fentanyl patch."( Consensus Perioperative Management Best Practices for Patients on Transdermal Fentanyl Patches Undergoing Surgery.
Cornett, EM; Ehrhardt, KP; Fox, CJ; Gennuso, SA; Kaye, AD; Menard, BL; Okereke, EC; Tirumala, SR, 2019
)
0.96
"Prophylactic FSS was well tolerated and demonstrated a dose-response relationship in improving both dyspnea and walk distance."( Prophylactic Fentanyl Sublingual Spray for Episodic Exertional Dyspnea in Cancer Patients: A Pilot Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Azhar, A; Bruera, E; Dalal, S; Dev, R; Driver, L; Haider, A; Hernandez, F; Hui, D; Kilgore, K; Larsson, L; Liu, D; Naberhuis, J; Reddy, A; Reddy, S; Virgilio, A, 2019
)
0.88
" Furthermore, enduring exacerbation of nociceptive hypersensitivity is also observed when the same dosing regimen for either morphine, fentanyl, or oxycodone begins 1 month after nerve injury."( Oxycodone, fentanyl, and morphine amplify established neuropathic pain in male rats.
Ball, JB; Fabisiak, T; Grace, PM; Green-Fulgham, SM; Kwilasz, AJ; Maier, SF; Watkins, LR, 2019
)
1.11
" Further evaluation of naloxone stocking and dosing protocols is needed."( Naloxone Dosing After Opioid Overdose in the Era of Illicitly Manufactured Fentanyl.
Atti, S; Carpenter, J; Moran, TP; Morgan, B; Murray, BP; Yancey, A, 2020
)
0.79
" Due to very limited pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data, fentanyl dosing is mostly based on bodyweight."( Rapidly maturing fentanyl clearance in preterm neonates.
Allegaert, K; Andriessen, P; Flint, RB; Knibbe, CAJ; Koch, BCP; Liem, KD; Simons, SHP; Völler, S; Zimmermann, LJI, 2019
)
1.09
" Opioid dosing remains challenging in burn patients, particularly in children, due to the immense variability in efficacy between patients."( Characterizing Fentanyl Variability Using Population Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Burn Patients.
Grimsrud, KN; Lima, KM; Palmieri, TL; Tran, NK, 2020
)
0.91
" Steady-state concentrations of the obese children using similar weight-based dosing increased by 25%, 77%, and 44% in comparison to nonobese children 4-, 9-, and 15-year-olds, respectively."( Prediction and Comparison of Fentanyl Infusion Pharmacokinetics in Obese and Nonobese Children.
Henry, ED; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Skrepnek, GH; Woo, S, 2019
)
0.81
" Weight-based dosing in obese children may cause an increase in steady-state concentration while prolonging the time to steady state."( Prediction and Comparison of Fentanyl Infusion Pharmacokinetics in Obese and Nonobese Children.
Henry, ED; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Skrepnek, GH; Woo, S, 2019
)
0.81
"The average weight-based dosage of propofol was similar in both groups but was lower in the high-body mass index group for midazolam and fentanyl."( Perioperative Risks Are Similar for Normal versus Selected High-Body Mass Index Patients Undergoing Outpatient Hand and Elbow Surgery.
Banner, L; Beredjiklian, PK; Jones, C; Lutsky, K; Selverian, S; Warrender, W, 2019
)
0.72
"7%) reduced benzodiazepines dosage when prescribing potent opioids."( Strong opioids and non-cancer chronic pain in Catalonia. An analysis of the family physicians prescription patterns.
Adriyanov, B; Álvarez Carrera, MA; Dürsteler, C; Perelló Bratescu, A; Riera Nadal, N; Sisó-Almirall, A, 2020
)
0.56
" TDS are dosage forms designed to deliver a therapeutically effective amount of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) across a patient's skin."( Raman mapping of fentanyl transdermal delivery systems with off-label modifications.
Keire, DA; Rodriguez, JD; Strasinger, C; Willett, DR; Wokovich, AM; Xu, T; Yilmaz, H, 2020
)
0.9
" However, Group F required less dosage of ephedrine for stable hemodynamics and longer time to use the primary postoperative analgesic in comparison to Group B (p<0."( Effects of Intrathecal Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine Plus Fentanyl in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Peng, X; Wang, H; Xiao, Y; Zhan, L; Zhao, B, 2019
)
0.76
" High-quality comparative naloxone dosing studies assessing effectiveness and safety are needed."( Naloxone dosing in the era of ultra-potent opioid overdoses: a systematic review.
Brasher, PMA; Buxton, JA; Curran, J; Doyle-Waters, MM; Godwin, J; Hau, JP; Hohl, CM; Moe, J; O'Sullivan, F; Purssell, E; Purssell, R, 2020
)
0.56
" The mean dosage of propofol in group A was significantly higher (62."( Pre-endoscopic tachycardia predicts increased sedation dose and lower adenoma detection rate in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures: a case control study.
Ahmad, HS; Baker, FA; Kadah, A; Khoury, T; Mahajnah, M; Mahamid, M; Mari, A; Pellicano, R; Sbeit, W, 2020
)
0.56
"Tachycardia prior to endoscopic procedures was associated with higher sedative dosage and lower adenoma detection rate, however no major complications were recorded."( Pre-endoscopic tachycardia predicts increased sedation dose and lower adenoma detection rate in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures: a case control study.
Ahmad, HS; Baker, FA; Kadah, A; Khoury, T; Mahajnah, M; Mahamid, M; Mari, A; Pellicano, R; Sbeit, W, 2020
)
0.56
" Among those with sufficient time exposure, 3,971 (82%) had adequate opioid exposure based on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) package insert dosing guidance."( Initiation of Transdermal Fentanyl Among US Commercially Insured Patients Between 2007 and 2015.
Costantino, RC; Fudin, J; Gressler, LE; McPherson, ML; Onukwugha, E; Slejko, JF; Villalonga-Olives, E, 2020
)
0.86
"Primary: 1) Treatment retention; 2) sustained remission (defined as 3 consecutive negative screens); 3) return to use; 4) methadone dosage required; and 5) number of days to achieve remission."( One year of methadone maintenance treatment in a fentanyl endemic area: Safety, repeated exposure, retention, and remission.
Carroll, JJ; Green, TC; Rich, JD; Stone, AC, 2020
)
0.81
" In this study, recombinant CHO-K1 cells (AequoScreen) expressing the human μ-opioid receptor were used to establish dose-response curves via luminescent analysis for cyclopropyl-, cyclobutyl-, cyclopentyl-, cyclohexyl-, and 2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropylfentanyl (TMCPF), on three separate occasions, using eight different concentrations in an eight-fold serial dilution in triplicates starting at ~60 μM."( Activation of the μ-opioid receptor by alicyclic fentanyls: Changes from high potency full agonists to low potency partial agonists with increasing alicyclic substructure.
Åstrand, A; Björn, N; Gréen, H; Jakobsen, I; Kronstrand, R; Vikingsson, S, 2021
)
1.06
" Since information about potency and lethal dosage are frequently unknown, it is important to identify the new trends for further investigation on therapeutic use, toxicity and fatal doses, and implement public health measures."( A 2017-2019 Update on Acute Intoxications and Fatalities from Illicit Fentanyl and Analogs.
Brunetti, P; Busardò, FP; Carlier, J; Giorgetti, R; Lo Faro, AF; Pirani, F, 2021
)
0.86
" Objective guidance of opioid dosing using the Nociception Level (NOL) index, a multiparameter artificial intelligence-driven index designed to monitor nociception during surgery, may lead to a more appropriate analgesic regimen, with effects beyond surgery."( Reduced postoperative pain using Nociception Level-guided fentanyl dosing during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.
Aarts, L; Boon, M; Calis, P; Dahan, A; Honing, M; Martini, C; Meijer, F; Niesters, M; Olofsen, E; Roor, T; Toet, S; van Velzen, M, 2020
)
0.8
"In this two-centre RCT, 50 patients undergoing abdominal surgery under fentanyl/sevoflurane anaesthesia were randomised to NOL-guided fentanyl dosing or standard care in which fentanyl dosing was based on haemodynamics."( Reduced postoperative pain using Nociception Level-guided fentanyl dosing during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.
Aarts, L; Boon, M; Calis, P; Dahan, A; Honing, M; Martini, C; Meijer, F; Niesters, M; Olofsen, E; Roor, T; Toet, S; van Velzen, M, 2020
)
1.04
" We attribute this to NOL-driven rather than BP- and HR-driven fentanyl dosing during anaesthesia."( Reduced postoperative pain using Nociception Level-guided fentanyl dosing during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.
Aarts, L; Boon, M; Calis, P; Dahan, A; Honing, M; Martini, C; Meijer, F; Niesters, M; Olofsen, E; Roor, T; Toet, S; van Velzen, M, 2020
)
1.04
" Additionally, after performing the Pearson chi-Square test we found that bronchospasm and laryngospasm were significantly more frequent among patients from group 1 infused with lower dosage of fentanyl in comparison to the infants that were administered with a higher dose of this medication (p = ."( Higher doses of fentanyl during bronchoscopy in infants significantly reduces perioperative complication rates.
Belitova, M; Popov, TM; Ts, M, 2020
)
1.09
"Gene polymorphism is an important factor affecting the efficacy and dosage of opioids."( Resistin Gene Polymorphism Is an Influencing Factor of Postoperative Pain for Chinese Patients.
Chen, Z; Fan, Q; Ge, W; Li, D; Ma, Z; Shu, Q; Xie, H, 2020
)
0.56
"Compared with a conservative dosing approach, this individualized protocol may improve analgesia without a significant increase in respiratory adverse events."( Effects of an individualized analgesia protocol on the need for medical interventions after adenotonsillectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial.
Guo, J; Liu, K; Wan, Y; Wang, X; Zhuang, P, 2021
)
0.62
"Different weight-based fentanyl dosing rates may be required for infants and children of different ages to achieve similar plasma concentrations."( Analysis of fentanyl pharmacokinetics, and its sedative effects and tolerance in critically ill children.
Heltsley, R; Henry, E; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Woo, S, 2021
)
1.31
" We included any duration of drug treatment and any dosage given continuously or as bolus; we excluded studies that gave opioids to ventilated infants for procedures."( Opioids for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation.
Bellù, R; Bruschettini, M; de Waal, KA; Nava, C; Romantsik, O; Zanini, R, 2021
)
0.62
" Linear mixed models were used to determine if the mean cumulative opioid/sedative dosing differed from the day of conversion versus three 24-hour periods prior to conversion."( Conversion From Continuous Infusion Fentanyl to Continuous Infusion Hydromorphone in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
Harkin, M; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Neely, SB; Walsh, CK, 2021
)
0.9
" Patients had a significant decrease in opioid dosing on the day of conversion versus the 24-hour period prior to conversion but no changes in sedative dosing following conversion."( Conversion From Continuous Infusion Fentanyl to Continuous Infusion Hydromorphone in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
Harkin, M; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Neely, SB; Walsh, CK, 2021
)
0.9
"This case demonstrates how patient-centered dose responses with a focus on functional outcomes supersede existing opioids agonist treatment dosing ranges, especially in the context of a patient with a higher than typical opioid tolerance."( Patient With Very High Opioid Tolerance Enrolled in Opioid Agonist Treatment: A Case Report.
Lim, R; Wilson, P,
)
0.13
" Pretreatment with antagonists selective for nociceptin and μ receptors, but not δ and κ receptor antagonists, caused rightward shifts of the antinociceptive dose-response curve of cebranopadol with dose ratios of 2 and 9, respectively."( Functional Profile of Systemic and Intrathecal Cebranopadol in Nonhuman Primates.
Caló, G; Ding, H; Hsu, FC; Kiguchi, N; Ko, MC; Trapella, C, 2021
)
0.62
"To assess sedation medication dosage differences between patients with and without opioid use disorder at the time of surgical abortion."( Pain medication requirements in patients with opioid use disorder at the time of surgical abortion: An exploratory study.
Ramanadhan, S; Srikanth, P; White, KO; Woodhams, E, 2021
)
0.62
" In a locale where fentanyl is responsible for the majority of non-fatal opioid overdoses, we compared the concentration of fentanyl in blood to naloxone dosing in the presence and absence of a concurrent sedative-hypnotic exposure."( Sentanyl: a comparison of blood fentanyl concentrations and naloxone dosing after non-fatal overdose.
Babu, KM; Chapman, BP; Devin-Holcombe, K; Fogarty, MF; Krotulski, AJ; Logan, BK; Marks, SJ; Merchant, RC; Ontiveros, ST; Trieu, H, 2022
)
1.33
" Among the sedative-hypnotic exposed, fentanyl concentrations were lower, but naloxone dosing was similar to those without a concomitant exposure."( Sentanyl: a comparison of blood fentanyl concentrations and naloxone dosing after non-fatal overdose.
Babu, KM; Chapman, BP; Devin-Holcombe, K; Fogarty, MF; Krotulski, AJ; Logan, BK; Marks, SJ; Merchant, RC; Ontiveros, ST; Trieu, H, 2022
)
1.28
" Fentanyl is known to cross the placental barrier, but how the route of administration and time after dosing affects maternal-fetal disposition kinetics at different stages of pregnancy is not well characterized."( Predicting Maternal-Fetal Disposition of Fentanyl Following Intravenous and Epidural Administration Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.
Isoherranen, N; Shen, DD; Shum, S, 2021
)
1.8
" Recent reports, however, suggest that higher doses or repeated dosing of naloxone (due to recurrence of respiratory depression) may be required to reverse fully fentanyl-induced respiratory depression, rendering this treatment inadequate."( Design, synthesis, and preliminary evaluation of a potential synthetic opioid rescue agent.
Baynard, C; Butelman, ER; Hedrick, SL; Horn, J; Jackson, K; Kaska, S; Kreek, MJ; Leggas, M; Luo, D; Niloy, KK; Prisinzano, TE; Sarma, R, 2021
)
0.82
" Low dosed opioids have been investigated for refractory dyspnea in COPD and other life-limiting conditions, and some positive effects were demonstrated."( Opioids in patients with COPD and refractory dyspnea: literature review and design of a multicenter double blind study of low dosed morphine and fentanyl (MoreFoRCOPD).
de Hosson, SM; Heller-Baan, R; Kerstjens, HAM; Lam-Wong, WY; Mooren, KJM; Peters, L; Pool, K; van Beurden-Moeskops, WJC; van den Berg, JK; van Dijk, M, 2021
)
0.82
" We also analyzed the dose-response relation of fentanyl administered by epidural or IV and early breastfeeding."( The association between intrapartum opioid fentanyl and early breastfeeding: A prospective observational study.
Eskedal, LT; Myr, R; Oddbjørn Tveit, T; Oommen, H; Swanson, DM; Vistad, I, 2021
)
1.14
" The overall morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per 24 hours of this dosage form available in the hospital were reduced from 56,073."( Optimization of the medication-use process for fentanyl patches at a small community hospital.
Glowczewski, J; Roberts, P; Wise, C, 2022
)
0.98
"Evaluation of the fentanyl patch medication-use process and pharmacy-driven interventions resulted in an increase in appropriate utilization of fentanyl patches and a decrease in accessible MME of this potent dosage form."( Optimization of the medication-use process for fentanyl patches at a small community hospital.
Glowczewski, J; Roberts, P; Wise, C, 2022
)
1.31
" Bodyweight-based dosing resulted in large differences in fentanyl concentrations."( Pre- and Postnatal Maturation are Important for Fentanyl Exposure in Preterm and Term Newborns: A Pooled Population Pharmacokinetic Study.
Allegaert, K; Fellman, V; Flint, RB; Knibbe, CAJ; Simons, SHP; Völler, S; Wu, Y, 2022
)
1.22
"As both prenatal and postnatal maturation are important for fentanyl exposure, we propose a birthweight- and PNA-based dosage regimen."( Pre- and Postnatal Maturation are Important for Fentanyl Exposure in Preterm and Term Newborns: A Pooled Population Pharmacokinetic Study.
Allegaert, K; Fellman, V; Flint, RB; Knibbe, CAJ; Simons, SHP; Völler, S; Wu, Y, 2022
)
1.22
" Fentanyl concentrations were measured from remnant blood specimens and dosing data were extracted from electronic health records."( Effect of CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 Genetic Variants on Fentanyl Pharmacokinetics in a Pediatric Population.
Breeyear, JH; Choi, L; Edwards, TL; Kannankeril, PJ; Van Driest, SL; Williams, ML, 2022
)
1.89
" Therefore, the present study aimed to clarify the optimal fentanyl dosage and timing of administration for the anesthetic management during PVI."( Proper use of fentanyl facilitates anesthesia during pulmonary vein isolation.
Banba, K; Hasui, Y; Ii, N; Matsumoto, K; Tachibana, M; Takamatsu, S, 2022
)
1.33
"9% saline (placebo) in combination with ketamine and rocuronium, according to a weight-based dosing schedule."( Fentanyl versus placebo with ketamine and rocuronium for patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department: The FAKT study-A randomized clinical trial.
Aneman, A; Burns, B; Buttfield, A; Ferguson, I; Harris, IA; Milligan, J; Reid, C; Shepherd, S, 2022
)
2.16
" Regarding the rescue dosage of fentanyl, the results were comparable between the groups."( A comparison of postoperative pain between transumbilical and suprapubic incision in laparoscopic liver resection.
Adachi, T; Eguchi, S; Hara, T; Hidaka, M; Imamura, H; Matsuguma, K; Matsushima, H; Murakami, S; Natsuda, K; Soyama, A; Tanaka, T, 2022
)
1
" Children with obesity are commonly prescribed the opioids fentanyl and methadone, and accurate dosing is critical to reducing the risk of serious adverse events associated with overexposure."( Use of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to inform dosing of the opioid analgesics fentanyl and methadone in children with obesity.
Al-Uzri, A; Atz, AM; Carreño, FO; Delmore, P; Edginton, AN; Ford, JL; Gerhart, JG; Gonzalez, D; Muller, WJ; Perrin, EM; Watt, KM, 2022
)
1.18
" Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to assess the ap-propriate dosing strategy for ketamine to produce adequate analgesia when used as a primary analgesic in mechanically ventilated patients."( Impact of ketamine versus fentanyl continuous infusion on opioid use in patients admitted to a surgical-trauma intensive care unit.
Kataria, V; Mooney, J; Nguyen, HL; Pazhani, Y; Ramos, A; Roth, J,
)
0.43
" Serological profiling of patients was performed by dosing the serum concentration of nucleotide-binding domain (NOD) and leucine-rich repeat protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes, interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), IL-10 before and two hours after the surgical procedure."( The perioperative effect of anesthetic drugs on the immune response in total intravenous anesthesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive gynecological surgery.
Boldeanu, L; Boldeanu, MV; Dijmărescu, AL; Manolea, MM; Mirea, CS; Neamţu, SD; Niculescu, M; Novac, MB; Radu, L; Rotaru, LT; Şerbănescu, MS; Vîlcea, AM,
)
0.13
"Flexible take-home dosing buprenorphine/naloxone or supervised methadone models of care for 24 weeks."( Impact of fentanyl use on initiation and discontinuation of methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone among people with prescription-type opioid use disorder: secondary analysis of a Canadian treatment trial.
Bozinoff, N; Bruneau, J; Choi, JC; Hassan, A; Jutras-Aswad, D; Le Foll, B; Lim, R; Mok, WY; Rehm, J; Socias, ME; Wild, TC; Wood, E, 2022
)
1.12
" The dosage of the active principle was measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet detection."( Impact of Ambient Temperature on 5 Emergency Drugs Aboard an Emergency Medical Car Over a 1-Year Period.
Marson, C; Roschel, K; Schneider, S; Stammet, P; Welter, C, 2022
)
0.72
" The primary outcome was the dosage of fentanyl-nefopam IV-PCA infused over 24 h postoperatively."( Effect of remifentanil on post-operative analgesic consumption in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty after interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial.
Bae, H; Kim, JT; Kim, Y; Lim, YJ; Park, SK; Sakura, S; Yoo, S, 2022
)
0.99
"The dosage of fentanyl-nefopam IV-PCA was significantly less in C group than R group for postoperative 24 h."( Effect of remifentanil on post-operative analgesic consumption in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty after interscalene brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial.
Bae, H; Kim, JT; Kim, Y; Lim, YJ; Park, SK; Sakura, S; Yoo, S, 2022
)
1.08
" This study aims to describe tolerability and completion of LDI using intravenous (IV) buprenorphine and to define dosing protocols in a cohort of patients hospitalized in an urban academic hospital."( Development of an intravenous low-dose buprenorphine initiation protocol.
Bodnar, AR; Jablonski, LA; Stewart, RW, 2022
)
0.72
" Cases were categorized based on adherence to a dosing strategy and LDI indication, including OUD and acute pain, non-prescribed fentanyl exposure, and transition from methadone."( Development of an intravenous low-dose buprenorphine initiation protocol.
Bodnar, AR; Jablonski, LA; Stewart, RW, 2022
)
0.93
"4) for the "rapid," "moderate," and "slow" dosing strategies, respectively."( Development of an intravenous low-dose buprenorphine initiation protocol.
Bodnar, AR; Jablonski, LA; Stewart, RW, 2022
)
0.72
" Dosing protocols allowed for rapid transition to sublingual buprenorphine."( Development of an intravenous low-dose buprenorphine initiation protocol.
Bodnar, AR; Jablonski, LA; Stewart, RW, 2022
)
0.72
" Prior research has assessed the effectiveness of naloxone in the hospital setting; however, it is challenging to assess naloxone dosing regimens in the community/first-responder setting, including reversal of respiratory depression effects of fentanyl and its derivatives (fentanyls)."( Development of a Translational Model to Assess the Impact of Opioid Overdose and Naloxone Dosing on Respiratory Depression and Cardiac Arrest.
Ahmadi, SF; Bloom, S; Chaturbedi, A; Dahan, A; Eshleman, A; Florian, J; Han, X; Janowsky, A; Li, Z; Mann, J; Olofsen, E; Samieegohar, M; Strauss, DG; Swanson, T; Wolfrum, K; Zirkle, J, 2022
)
0.9
"Medication errors include the indirect dosing of drugs."( Accuracy of Spinal Anesthesia Drug Concentrations in Mixtures Prepared by Anesthetists.
Heesen, M; Schwappach, D; Steuer, C; Wiedemeier, P, 2022
)
0.72
" A need exists to adapt methadone dosing from opioid treatment programs (OTPs) in this era."( Adapting methadone inductions to the fentanyl era.
Buresh, M; Nahvi, S; Steiger, S; Weinstein, ZM, 2022
)
0.99
"The scoping review identified 57 studies with most data available on their tolerability (68% local, 54% systemic), clinical effects (82%), details on dosage (96%) and routes of application (100%)."( Subcutaneous Drugs and Off-label Use in Hospice and Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.
Dürr, F; Jean-Petit-Matile, S; Kobleder, A; Meyer-Massetti, C; Wernli, U, 2022
)
0.72
"Sedation and analgesia are recommended during targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest, but there are few data to provide guidance on dosing to bedside clinicians."( Cardiac Arrest Treatment Center Differences in Sedation and Analgesia Dosing During Targeted Temperature Management.
Ceric, A; Cronberg, T; Dankiewicz, J; Friberg, H; Hassager, C; Haxhija, Z; Kjaergaard, J; Lybeck, A; May, TL; Nielsen, N; Riker, RR; Seder, DB, 2023
)
0.91
" We also compared dosing with time to awakening, incidence of clinical seizures, and survival."( Cardiac Arrest Treatment Center Differences in Sedation and Analgesia Dosing During Targeted Temperature Management.
Ceric, A; Cronberg, T; Dankiewicz, J; Friberg, H; Hassager, C; Haxhija, Z; Kjaergaard, J; Lybeck, A; May, TL; Nielsen, N; Riker, RR; Seder, DB, 2023
)
0.91
" There were associations between higher dosing at 48 h (p = 0."( Cardiac Arrest Treatment Center Differences in Sedation and Analgesia Dosing During Targeted Temperature Management.
Ceric, A; Cronberg, T; Dankiewicz, J; Friberg, H; Hassager, C; Haxhija, Z; Kjaergaard, J; Lybeck, A; May, TL; Nielsen, N; Riker, RR; Seder, DB, 2023
)
0.91
" Sedation and analgesia dosing and titration were associated with delayed awakening, incidence of clinical seizures, and survival, but the causal relation of these findings cannot be proven."( Cardiac Arrest Treatment Center Differences in Sedation and Analgesia Dosing During Targeted Temperature Management.
Ceric, A; Cronberg, T; Dankiewicz, J; Friberg, H; Hassager, C; Haxhija, Z; Kjaergaard, J; Lybeck, A; May, TL; Nielsen, N; Riker, RR; Seder, DB, 2023
)
0.91
" Specifically, in patients with chronic fentanyl or other drug exposures, some clinicians are using alternative buprenorphine induction strategies, such as quickly maximizing buprenorphine agonist effects (eg, macrodosing) or, conversely, giving smaller initial doses and slowing the rate of buprenorphine dosing to avoid antagonist/withdrawal effects (eg, microdosing)."( A Neuropharmacological Model to Explain Buprenorphine Induction Challenges.
Azar, P; Greenwald, MK; Herring, AA; Nelson, LS; Perrone, J, 2022
)
0.99
" Complete fentanyl dose-response functions were determined during each session."( A novel long-acting formulation of oral buprenorphine/naloxone produces prolonged decreases in fentanyl self-administration by rhesus monkeys.
Comer, SD; Foltin, RW; Nagaraj, N; Scranton, RE; Sykes, KA; Zale, S, 2022
)
1.34
" After Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 75 ASA 1-3 adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, were randomized to NOL-guided fentanyl dosing (NOL) or standard care (SOC) and completed the study."( Reduced postoperative pain in patients receiving nociception monitor guided analgesia during elective major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.
Freundlich, A; Fuica, R; Gozal, Y; Greenman, D; Krochek, C; Weissbrod, R, 2023
)
1.11
" We found a large heterogeneity regarding sample size, age and gender distribution, inclusion criteria (different severity scores, if any) and ketamine dosing (bolus and/or continuous infusion)."( Use of ketamine in patients with refractory severe asthma exacerbations: systematic review of prospective studies.
Astuto, M; Brancati, S; Crimi, C; Cuttone, G; Dezio, V; Falcone, M; La Via, L; Sanfilippo, F, 2022
)
0.72
" Future studies should investigate the appropriate dosage and route of administration of ketamine to be used while managing pain among children with acute and severe pain in the emergency department."( The Effectiveness of Ketamine Compared to Opioid Analgesics for management of acute pain in Children in The Emergency Department: systematic Review.
Alanazi, E, 2022
)
0.72
" Demographic data, visual analog scale (VAS) and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) scores, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR), total dosage of fentanyl, satisfaction rate of anesthesia and complications were collected at different timepoints."( Effect of intradiscal local anesthetic injection on intraoperative pain during percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: A retrospective study.
Duan, L; Kang, JY; Zhang, JH; Zhang, JY; Zhou, HC, 2023
)
1.11
" Group L had a lower total dosage of fentanyl (71 [63, 78] μg) and a higher anesthesia satisfaction rate (95."( Effect of intradiscal local anesthetic injection on intraoperative pain during percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: A retrospective study.
Duan, L; Kang, JY; Zhang, JH; Zhang, JY; Zhou, HC, 2023
)
1.18
"Adjusting for covariates, both the total number of drug seizures and amount of cocaine seized (in dosage units per capita) positively predicted next-year opioid- and fentanyl-involved fatal overdose rates."( Supply-side predictors of fatal drug overdose in the Washington/Baltimore HIDTA region: 2016-2020.
Bates, R; Carr, T; Lowder, EM; Peppard, L; Zhou, W, 2022
)
0.92
" These findings justify further study into the optimal dosing of fentanyl during RSI in pre-hospital and retrieval medicine."( The effect of ketamine and fentanyl on haemodynamics during intubation in pre-hospital and retrieval medicine.
Aneman, A; Bliss, J; Ferguson, IMC; Harris, IA; Miller, MR; Partyka, C, 2023
)
1.45
" Data obtained from the electronic medical records included primary outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] scores and anesthesia satisfaction rate) and secondary outcomes, including vital signs such as heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), total dosage of fentanyl, operation time, X-ray exposure time, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and complications."( Analgesic effect of epidural anesthesia via the intervertebral foramen approach in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective study.
Cai, Z; Kang, J; Liu, Y; Nie, C; Wang, X; Zhang, J; Zhou, H, 2022
)
0.9
" Future studies should evaluate the optimal methadone dosing and overlap time to prevent opioid IWS."( Characterization of early versus late opioid iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in critically ill children transitioning from fentanyl -infusions to methadone.
Gupta, N; Hintze, TD; Johnson, PN; Lim, SY; Miller, JL; Neely, SB,
)
0.34
" Nasal and oromucosal fentanyl dosage forms are so called immediate release fentanyl (IRF)."( Immediate release fentanyl in general practices: Mostly off-label prescribing.
Bouvy, ML; Hek, K; van Dijk, L; Weesie, YM, 2023
)
1.56
" Thirty-five patients were assigned to NOL-guided analgesic dosing and 37 to routine care."( Nociception Level Index-Guided Intraoperative Analgesia for Improved Postoperative Recovery: A Randomized Trial.
Bakal, O; Essber, H; Han, Y; Keebler, A; Mascha, EJ; Montalvo, M; Ramachandran, M; Rössler, J; Ruetzler, K; Sessler, DI; Turan, A, 2023
)
0.91
" We used whole-body plethysmography to first establish dose-response curves by recording breathing for 60 minutes post-intravenous opioid injection."( Heroin- and Fentanyl-Induced Respiratory Depression in a Rat Plethysmography Model: Potency, Tolerance, and Sex Differences.
Carlson, ER; Frye, EV; Hampson, A; Hastings, LE; Koob, GF; Lewis, SJ; Marchette, RCN; Mejias-Torres, G; Vendruscolo, JCM; Vendruscolo, LF; Volkow, ND, 2023
)
1.29
" While low dosing is thought to be a factor limiting naloxone's efficacy, the timing between fentanyl exposure and initiation of naloxone treatment may be another important factor."( The pattern of brain oxygen response induced by intravenous fentanyl limits the time window of therapeutic efficacy of naloxone.
Curay, CM; Irwin, MR; Kiyatkin, EA, 2023
)
1.37
" During the dose-response test, females given limited access to fentanyl demonstrated increased motivation to acquire fentanyl compared to males."( Chronic inflammatory pain promotes place preference for fentanyl in male rats but does not change fentanyl self-administration in male and female rats.
Barattini, AE; Edwards, KN; Edwards, S; Gilpin, NW; Montanari, C; Pahng, AR, 2023
)
1.4
" We conducted the Kruskal-Wallis H test to evaluate for medication dosing or maximum pain score differences among groups."( The association of patient age, race, and demographic features on reported pain and sedation dosing during procedural abortion: A retrospective cohort study.
Howard, M; Lee, J; Makar, E; Pace, L, 2023
)
0.91
" We found no difference in fentanyl or midazolam dosing by age."( The association of patient age, race, and demographic features on reported pain and sedation dosing during procedural abortion: A retrospective cohort study.
Howard, M; Lee, J; Makar, E; Pace, L, 2023
)
1.21
" Multiple demographic and psychosocial factors, as well as perhaps provider bias, play into both a patient's perception of pain and the dosage of fentanyl and midazolam they receive during abortion procedures."( The association of patient age, race, and demographic features on reported pain and sedation dosing during procedural abortion: A retrospective cohort study.
Howard, M; Lee, J; Makar, E; Pace, L, 2023
)
1.11
" The total propofol and fentanyl dosage requirements, a number of patients who required propofol and fentanyl, side effects, and satisfaction were not different between the groups."( Popliteal sciatic nerve block for high-risk patients undergoing lower limb angioplasty: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Jirativanont, T; Noikham, A; Pongraweewan, O; Puangpunngam, N; Suphathamwit, A; Tivirach, W, 2023
)
1.22
" Moreover, OPRM1 A118G wild type gene A was found to be a risk factor for increased dosage of fentanyl in the PACU."( Is OPRM1 genotype a valuable predictor of VAS in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer with fentanyl?
Cao, L; Gao, Y; Guo, W; Huang, J; Li, Y; Pan, B; Wang, B; Yang, Y; Zhou, Y, 2023
)
1.34
" Moreover, it is a risk factor for increased dosage of fentanyl in the PACU."( Is OPRM1 genotype a valuable predictor of VAS in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer with fentanyl?
Cao, L; Gao, Y; Guo, W; Huang, J; Li, Y; Pan, B; Wang, B; Yang, Y; Zhou, Y, 2023
)
1.36
" The objective of this systematic review is to identify and present studies comparing low-dose ketamine to opioids when combined with propofol for procedural sedation in the ED and to describe the dosing regimen, observed efficacy, and side effects."( Low-dose ketamine or opioids combined with propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review.
De Vries, LJ; Lameijer, H; Van Roon, EN; Veeger, NJGM, 2023
)
0.91
" Both exposures were also associated with a reduced probability and reduced total dosage of opioid administration in the PACU."( Association of Intraoperative Opioid Administration With Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use.
Balanza, G; Bharadwaj, KM; Bittner, EA; Das, P; Deng, H; Gutierrez, R; Horgan, C; Houle, TT; Johnson, JJ; Liu, R; Macdonald, T; Pandit, A; Purdon, PL; Santa Cruz Mercado, LA; Stone, TAD; Tou, SLJ, 2023
)
0.91
" The analgesic efficacy of pH-dependent opioids has not been studied during the evolution of inflammation, where fluctuating tissue pH and repeated therapeutic dosing could influence analgesia and side effects."( Evolving acidic microenvironments during colitis provide selective analgesic targets for a pH-sensitive opioid.
Alizadeh, E; Bunnett, NW; Degro, CE; Guzman-Rodriguez, M; Hurlbut, D; Jiménez-Vargas, NN; Lomax, AE; Reed, DE; Stein, C; Tsang, Q; Vanner, SJ; Yu, Y, 2023
)
0.91
" Variation exists in the recommended agent and dosing strategies."( Evaluation of Nonintubated Analgesia Practices in Critical Care Transport.
Bondurant, M; Esteves, AM; Gilchrist, HE; Markwood, JM; Roginski, MA,
)
0.13
" A low dosage continuous propofol infusion provides patients with profound anxiolysis and relaxation while maintaining wakefulness."( A Review of Novel Anesthetic Technique for Vitreoretinal Surgery.
Dodson, S; Todorich, B; Wang, R, 2023
)
0.91
"The salivary TDM of fentanyl in newborns can be useful in newborns exposed to intrauterine exposure from parturient females dosed with epidural fentanyl."( Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl in the Brain Extracellular Fluid, Saliva, Urine, and Plasma of Newborns from Transplacental Exposure from Parturient Mothers Dosed with Epidural Fentanyl Utilizing PBPK Modeling.
Alsmadi, MM, 2023
)
1.51
"In this cohort study of patients admitted to the ED with confirmed opioid overdose testing positive for NPOs, in-hospital naloxone dosing was high compared with patients who tested positive for fentanyl alone."( Naloxone Use in Novel Potent Opioid and Fentanyl Overdoses in Emergency Department Patients.
Abston, S; Aldy, K; Amaducci, A; Brent, J; Campleman, SL; Culbreth, RE; Krotulski, A; Li, S; Logan, B; Manini, AF; Meyn, A; Wax, P, 2023
)
1.37
"The aim of this study is to assess the current situation in out of hospital pain management in Germany regarding the substances, indications, dosage and the delegation of the use of analgesics to emergency medical service (EMS) staff."( Application of analgesics in emergency services in Germany: a survey of the medical directors.
Scharonow, M; Scharonow, O; Vilcane, S; Weilbach, C, 2023
)
0.91
" However, current US Food and Drug Administration buprenorphine dosing guidelines are based on studies among people using heroin, prior to the emergence of fentanyl in the illicit drug supply."( Buprenorphine Dose and Time to Discontinuation Among Patients With Opioid Use Disorder in the Era of Fentanyl.
Beaudoin, FL; Berk, J; Chambers, LC; Gaither, R; Hallowell, BD; Hampson, AJ; Paiva, TJ; Wightman, RS; Zullo, AR, 2023
)
1.32
" However, patients frequently face a dose limit of 16 or 24 mg/d based on dosing guidelines on the Food and Drug Administration's package label."( Evidence on Buprenorphine Dose Limits: A Review.
Cundiff, D; Grande, LA; Greenwald, MK; Martin, SA; Murray, M; Wright, TE,
)
0.13
" An update to the buprenorphine package label with recommended dosing up to 32 mg/d and elimination of the 16 mg/d target dose would improve treatment effectiveness and save lives."( Evidence on Buprenorphine Dose Limits: A Review.
Cundiff, D; Grande, LA; Greenwald, MK; Martin, SA; Murray, M; Wright, TE,
)
0.13
" However, published regimens vary in duration, dosage forms used, and timing of full opioid agonist discontinuation."( Survey of Buprenorphine Low-dose Regimens Used by Healthcare Institutions.
Grable, S; Hardy, M; Otley, R; Pershing, M,
)
0.13
" Appropriate dosing will be determined based on the participant's gestational age."( Intravenous acetaminophen for postoperative pain in the neonatal intensive care unit: A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial (IVA POP).
Archer, VA; Braga, LH; Briatico, D; Farrokyhar, F; Samiee-Zafarghandy, S; Walton, JM, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (6)

RoleDescription
opioid analgesicA narcotic or opioid substance, synthetic or semisynthetic agent producing profound analgesia, drowsiness, and changes in mood.
mu-opioid receptor agonistA compound that exhibits agonist activity at the mu-opioid receptor.
anaesthesia adjuvantAny substance that possesses little anaesthetic effect by itself, but which enhances or potentiates the anaesthetic action of other drugs when given at the same time.
intravenous anaestheticnull
adjuvantAny pharmacological or immunological agent that modifies the effect of other agents such as drugs or vaccines while having few if any direct effects when given by itself.
anaestheticSubstance which produces loss of feeling or sensation.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (3)

ClassDescription
piperidines
anilideAny aromatic amide obtained by acylation of aniline.
monocarboxylic acid amideA carboxamide derived from a monocarboxylic acid.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Pathways (1)

PathwayProteinsCompounds
Fentanyl Action Pathway3111

Protein Targets (31)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
LuciferasePhotinus pyralis (common eastern firefly)Potency40.53340.007215.758889.3584AID624030
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency28.23200.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.39790.000221.22318,912.5098AID743036; AID743040; AID743053
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency14.12540.01237.983543.2770AID1346984
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.00000.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346985
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency16.93010.000229.305416,493.5996AID743075
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.12200.035520.977089.1251AID504332
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency2.23870.01789.637444.6684AID588834
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Solute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)46.17000.21005.553710.0000AID1526751
ATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)6.50000.00022.318510.0000AID679130
D(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki21.00000.00000.651810.0000AID1823672
Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)Ki5.46200.00192.379710.0000AID223244
D(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.55400.00000.436210.0000AID1823675
Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)Ki5.46200.00061.777110.0000AID223244
Delta-type opioid receptorMus musculus (house mouse)IC50 (µMol)0.63420.00010.729810.0000AID1247885; AID749871
Delta-type opioid receptorMus musculus (house mouse)Ki0.56900.00000.53939.4000AID1245111; AID1247885
Delta-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.01220.00030.38877.0000AID149047; AID150260; AID150396; AID150397
Delta-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.61170.00000.60689.2330AID149667; AID149784
Mu-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.18880.00010.887410.0000AID1247885; AID149047; AID150260; AID150396; AID150397; AID1576134
Mu-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.07340.00000.38458.6000AID1247885; AID151590; AID151606; AID151621; AID151900
Kappa-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)0.01220.00050.36987.0000AID149047; AID150260; AID150396; AID150397
Histamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)147.91100.00000.44365.1768AID697786
Mu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00580.00010.813310.0000AID1512057; AID1512058; AID152239
Mu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.00300.00000.419710.0000AID150843; AID150845; AID1572983; AID1823673; AID1855412; AID1917880
D(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki26.20000.00000.602010.0000AID1823674
Delta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.30920.00020.75218.0140AID148078; AID149185
Delta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.80250.00000.59789.9300AID1272086; AID150088
Kappa-type opioid receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)IC50 (µMol)5.89300.00030.71237.0700AID147962
Kappa-type opioid receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Ki0.19650.00000.20186.4240AID149261
Kappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.58000.00001.201110.0000AID147859
Kappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.19650.00000.362410.0000AID148708
Mu-type opioid receptorMus musculus (house mouse)Ki0.00590.00000.12281.3000AID1245110
Mu-type opioid receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)IC50 (µMol)0.00310.00020.660310.0000AID148995
Mu-type opioid receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Ki0.00590.00000.27869.0000AID1245110
Potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.81970.00091.901410.0000AID243151
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)IC50 (µMol)4.97300.00202.123310.0000AID1576132
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Ki2.47430.00000.338510.0000AID1855411
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.35400.00030.70285.3660AID1576130
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.00040.00000.490110.0000AID1736834
Sigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki1.00000.00030.26715.0700AID1576131
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)31.60000.00203.519610.0000AID1215086; AID1215087; AID1215094
Mu-type opioid receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)EC50 (µMol)0.03240.00000.06470.9320AID224581
Mu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.02620.00000.32639.4000AID1573395; AID1573397; AID1611652; AID1701325
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (260)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
establishment or maintenance of transmembrane electrochemical gradientSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
acetylcholine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
epinephrine transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
serotonin uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
metanephric proximal tubule developmentSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
purine-containing compound transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptakeSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic cation transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-carnitine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
acyl carnitine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transportSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
cellular detoxificationSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular receptor signaling pathwayNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycleATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipid translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
terpenoid transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of response to osmotic stressATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide translocationATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of anion channel activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic detoxification by transmembrane export across the plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chloride transportATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
temperature homeostasisD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein phosphorylationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nervous system process involved in regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rateD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of sodium ion transportD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor internalizationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuroblast proliferationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of receptor internalizationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
autophagyD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuron-neuron synaptic transmissionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
axonogenesisD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapse assemblyD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of smellD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
long-term memoryD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
grooming behaviorD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
locomotory behaviorD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adult walking behaviorD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein localizationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
associative learningD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
visual learningD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to light stimulusD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to iron ionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to inactivityD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Wnt signaling pathwayD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
striatum developmentD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
orbitofrontal cortex developmentD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cerebral cortex GABAergic interneuron migrationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenohypophysis developmentD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell migrationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
peristalsisD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
auditory behaviorD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytokinesisD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
circadian regulation of gene expressionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of dopamine secretionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to histamineD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of urine volumeD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of renal sodium excretionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of multicellular organism growthD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to cocaineD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of circadian sleep/wake cycle, sleepD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine metabolic processD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
drinking behaviorD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transportD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to morphineD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
pigmentationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood pressureD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of innate immune responseD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IID(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of insulin secretionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
acid secretionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to ethanolD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of long-term neuronal synaptic plasticityD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to axon injuryD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
branching morphogenesis of a nerveD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid secretionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell proliferationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of epithelial cell proliferationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein secretionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of synapse structural plasticityD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
excitatory postsynaptic potentialD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of growth hormone secretionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prepulse inhibitionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of locomotion involved in locomotory behaviorD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic modulation of chemical synaptic transmissionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cellular response to hypoxiaD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor productionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of long-term synaptic potentiationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
hyaloid vascular plexus regressionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuron migrationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine secretionD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of adenylate cyclase activityD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of voltage-gated calcium channel activityD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
biogenic amine metabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of signal transductionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine catabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAP kinase activityD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral fear responseD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, dopaminergicD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasisD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adult locomotory behaviorD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of sodium:proton antiporter activityD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of kinase activityD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to histamineD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
social behaviorD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine metabolic processD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine metabolic processD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
fear responseD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian rhythmD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAP kinase activityD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to ethanolD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
rhythmic processD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid secretionD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein secretionD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
inhibitory postsynaptic potentialD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor internalizationD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of voltage-gated calcium channel activityD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting serotonin receptor signaling pathwayD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to toxic substanceAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to aluminum ionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to selenium ionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of serotonin secretionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
phenylethylamine catabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
substantia nigra developmentAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine catabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dopamine metabolic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
hydrogen peroxide biosynthetic processAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
response to corticosteroneAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
memoryHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
visual learningHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of vascular permeabilityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vasoconstrictionHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic plasticityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to histamineHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor signaling pathwayHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled acetylcholine receptor signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perceptionMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of painMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to ethanolMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neurogenesisMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Wnt protein secretionMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of ERK1 and ERK2 cascadeMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion transmembrane transportMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to morphineMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cellular response to stressMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of NMDA receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwayMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, dopaminergicD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor internalizationD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasisD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
learning or memoryD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
learningD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
locomotory behaviorD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
visual learningD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine secretionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cytokinesisD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
circadian regulation of gene expressionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to histamineD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
social behaviorD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to cocaineD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine metabolic processD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to morphineD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of blood pressureD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitotic nuclear divisionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
acid secretionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiationD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid secretionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein secretionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
musculoskeletal movement, spinal reflex actionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of dopamine uptake involved in synaptic transmissionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
prepulse inhibitionD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of adenylate cyclase activityD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of voltage-gated calcium channel activityD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transportD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating dopamine receptor signaling pathwayD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
immune responseDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adult locomotory behaviorDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein-containing complex assemblyDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of CREB transcription factor activityDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylationDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
eating behaviorDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane potentialDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of calcium ion transportDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to growth factor stimulusDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to toxic substanceDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwayDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
immune responseKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perceptionKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
locomotory behaviorKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of painKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-inhibiting opioid receptor signaling pathwayKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to insulinKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dopamine secretionKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of luteinizing hormone secretionKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwayKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
maternal behaviorKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
eating behaviorKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
estrous cycleKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of saliva secretionKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to cocaineKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sensory perception of temperature stimulusKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose stimulusKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of p38MAPK cascadeKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to acrylamideKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of eating behaviorKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
conditioned place preferenceKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwayKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by hormonePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion homeostasisPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle contractionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of ventricular cardiac muscle cell membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane depolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of heart rate by cardiac conductionPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane repolarization during ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potentialPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of potassium ion transmembrane transportPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of potassium ion export across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
potassium ion import across plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
lipid transportSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nervous system developmentSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor signaling pathwaySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of neuron apoptotic processSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein homotrimerizationSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (79)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
acetylcholine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine:sodium symporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine:sodium symporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
monoamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
secondary active organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
organic cation transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
pyrimidine nucleoside transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
thiamine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
putrescine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
quaternary ammonium group transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
toxin transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
(R)-carnitine transmembrane transporter activitySolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylcholine floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
phosphatidylethanolamine flippase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
ceramide floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
floppase activityATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
dopamine neurotransmitter receptor activity, coupled via Gi/GoD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G-protein alpha-subunit bindingD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
heterotrimeric G-protein bindingD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine bindingD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ionotropic glutamate receptor bindingD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
heterocyclic compound bindingD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
primary amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
aliphatic amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
flavin adenine dinucleotide bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine neurotransmitter receptor activity, coupled via Gi/GoD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine neurotransmitter receptor activityD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
potassium channel regulator activityD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
SH3 domain bindingD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine bindingD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epinephrine bindingD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine bindingD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activityD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
serotonin bindingD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
primary amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
electron transfer activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
aliphatic amine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
monoamine oxidase activityAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
flavin adenine dinucleotide bindingAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
histamine receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled serotonin receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activityHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G-protein alpha-subunit bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-endorphin receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated calcium channel activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
morphine receptor activityMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G-protein beta-subunit bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide bindingMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopamine neurotransmitter receptor activity, coupled via Gi/GoD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor activityD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor activityDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor serine/threonine kinase bindingDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled enkephalin receptor activityDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide bindingDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor activityKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor serine/threonine kinase bindingKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dynorphin receptor activityKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide bindingKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
delayed rectifier potassium channel activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
C3HC4-type RING finger domain bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
scaffold protein bindingPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel activity involved in ventricular cardiac muscle cell action potential repolarizationPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled opioid receptor activitySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (66)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
lateral plasma membraneSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
presynapseSolute carrier family 22 member 1 Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
intermediate filament cytoskeletonNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear receptor subfamily 1 group I member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-dependent translocase ABCB1Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
acrosomal vesicleD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ciliumD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
lateral plasma membraneD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endocytic vesicleD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
axonD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic vesicle membraneD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sperm flagellumD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendritic spineD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
axon terminusD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
ciliary membraneD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
non-motile ciliumD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dopaminergic synapseD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
GABA-ergic synapseD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor complexD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneD(2) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] AHomo sapiens (human)
centrosomeD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
postsynapseD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteD(4) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial envelopeAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial outer membraneAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionAmine oxidase [flavin-containing] BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistamine H1 receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
axonMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionMu-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synapseD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneD(3) dopamine receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic vesicle membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
axon terminusDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
spine apparatusDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal dense core vesicleDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionDelta-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
sarcoplasmic reticulumKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
T-tubuleKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
synaptic vesicle membraneKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
perikaryonKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
axon terminusKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionKappa-type opioid receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMu-type opioid receptorMus musculus (house mouse)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfacePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
voltage-gated potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
inward rectifier potassium channel complexPotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membranePotassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear envelopeSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear inner membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear outer membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
lipid dropletSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic densitySigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
growth coneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicleSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
anchoring junctionSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic density membraneSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumSigma non-opioid intracellular receptor 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (306)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1512059Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-12, Volume: 10, Issue:9
β-Fluorofentanyls Are pH-Sensitive Mu Opioid Receptor Agonists.
AID1433425Antinociceptive activity in CD-1 mouse mechanical stimulus-induced nociception model assessed as struggle response latency at 0.12 mg/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to test in presence of peripherally restricted opioid antagonist Nx-M by paw pressure t
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID496829Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania infantum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID150843Displacement of [3H]DAMGO (2 nM ) from opioid receptor mu 1 in human brain2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-19, Volume: 14, Issue:2
Fentanyl derivatives bearing aliphatic alkaneguanidinium moieties: a new series of hybrid molecules with significant binding affinity for mu-opioid receptors and I2-imidazoline binding sites.
AID1611652Agonist activity at human MOR expressed in CHO-K1 cells assessed as cAMP accumulation incubated for 30 mins and measured after 1 hr by Eu-cAMP tracer based TR-FRET assay2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-14, Volume: 10, Issue:11
Synthesis and μ-Opioid Activity of the Primary Metabolites of Carfentanil.
AID1526814Cmax in human at 5 mg, TD2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1512056Ratio of IC50 for Gi-coupled mu opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293T cells at pH 7.4 to IC50 for Gi-coupled mu opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293T cells at pH 6.5 by Glo-sensor assay2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-12, Volume: 10, Issue:9
β-Fluorofentanyls Are pH-Sensitive Mu Opioid Receptor Agonists.
AID1701329Agonist activity at delta opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293-A cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation incubated for 30 mins by competition PKA binding assay
AID7783Unbound fraction (plasma)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1701342Analgesic activity in icv dosed Kunming mouse assessed as time duration during which supraspinal antinociception lasted by radiant heat tail flick test
AID8002Observed volume of distribution2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID1433422Antinociceptive activity in sc dosed CD-1 mouse mechanical stimulus-induced nociception model assessed as struggle response latency administered 30 mins prior to test by paw pressure test
AID1701341Analgesic activity in icv dosed Kunming mouse by radiant heat tail flick test
AID1272086Displacement of [3H]DPDPE from human delta opioid receptor2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
Design synthesis and structure-activity relationship of 5-substituted (tetrahydronaphthalen-2yl)methyl with N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-2-yl)propionamide derivatives as opioid ligands.
AID476633Agonist activity at delta opioid receptor in mouse vas deferens assessed as inhibition of electrically-stimulated muscle contraction2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
"Carba"-analogues of fentanyl are opioid receptor agonists.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1573397Agonist activity at human mu opioid receptor expressed in human U2OS cells co-transfected with beta-arrestin-2 assessed as increase in beta-arrestin-2 recruitment after 90 mins by BRET assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Biased Ligands of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs): Structure-Functional Selectivity Relationships (SFSRs) and Therapeutic Potential.
AID1512058Agonist activity at Gi-coupled mu opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293T cells assessed as inhibition of cAMP production at pH 6.5 measured after 15 mins by Glo-Sensor assay2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-12, Volume: 10, Issue:9
β-Fluorofentanyls Are pH-Sensitive Mu Opioid Receptor Agonists.
AID1654585Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-25, Volume: 63, Issue:12
Metabolic and Pharmaceutical Aspects of Fluorinated Compounds.
AID1855441Toxicity in ICR mouse assessed as effect on conditioned place preference at 0.05 mg/kg, sc
AID243422log (1/Km) value for human liver microsome cytochrome P450 3A42005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 15, Issue:18
Modeling K(m) values using electrotopological state: substrates for cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated metabolism.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID476636Displacement of [3H]U69593 from kappa opioid receptor in guinea pig brain membrane2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
"Carba"-analogues of fentanyl are opioid receptor agonists.
AID496832Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1701371Toxicity in Kunming mouse assessed as activation of reward circuits at 0.19 umol/kg, sc by CPP test
AID1701350Analgesic activity in Kunming mouse at 0.19 umol/kg, sc pre-treated with 1 mg/kg, sc peripherally restricted opioid receptor antagonist naloxone methiodide by radiant heat tail flick test
AID1855439Toxicity in naloxone-induced withdrawal symptoms in ICR mouse assessed as effect on jumping response at 0.024 to 0.72 mg/kg, sc administered twice a day for 7 days followed by naloxone stimulation
AID129034Duration of analgesic activity in a standard mouse hot plate assay (between 6 and 15 min); inactive1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID496817Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma cruzi2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1855446Toxicity in ICR mouse assessed as effect on motor coordination at 0.1 mg/kg, sc micromol/kg, sc by rotarod test
AID174621Duration of analgesic effect calculated using in vivo rat tail withdrawal assay.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 34, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of ultrashort- to long-acting opioid analgetics.
AID1576135Potency index, ratio of SKF10047 IC50 to test compound IC50 for Displacement of [3H]pentazocine from LAL/HA/BR guinea pig brain sigma1 receptor2019MedChemComm, Jul-01, Volume: 10, Issue:7
Affinity of fentanyl and its derivatives for the σ
AID781328pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Luan ref: Pharm. Res. 20052014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID1433432Antinociceptive activity in CD-1 mouse mechanical stimulus-induced nociception model assessed as struggle response latency at 0.12 mg/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to test in presence of sigma1 receptor agonist PRE-084 by paw pressure test
AID29337Ionisation constant (pKa)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID196362Recovery of motor co-ordination after intravenous injection of ED100 and regaining of righting after 90 seconds later.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID176816Tested for analgesic activity using rat hot plate technique1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID150845Binding affinity against Opioid receptor mu 12000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-10, Volume: 43, Issue:3
Molecular docking reveals a novel binding site model for fentanyl at the mu-opioid receptor.
AID254270Binding affinity towards opioid receptor mu 12005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-20, Volume: 48, Issue:21
Designed multiple ligands. An emerging drug discovery paradigm.
AID699540Inhibition of human liver OATP1B3 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID540221Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID127630Duration of action in mouse hot plate, less than 9 min at 8 times ED50 was evaluated1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID193079Duration to produce analgesic activity was measured in rats by tail withdrawal reflex test (TWR), administered by intravenous at peak time 4 min (16 X MED50 dose)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1433440Antinociceptive activity in CD-1 mouse mechanical stimulus-induced nociception model assessed as struggle response latency time at 0.16 mg/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to test in presence of sigma1 receptor agonist PRE-084 by paw pressure test
AID1245112Agonist activity at delta opioid receptor in beta-funaltrexamine-treated mouse vas deferens2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 23, Issue:18
Discovery of 5-substituted tetrahydronaphthalen-2yl-methyl with N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-4-yl)propionamide derivatives as potent opioid receptor ligands.
AID1247889Agonist activity at delta opioid receptor in mouse vas deferens assessed as inhibition of electrically stimulated muscle contraction2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:20
Design and synthesis of novel bivalent ligands (MOR and DOR) by conjugation of enkephalin analogues with 4-anilidopiperidine derivatives.
AID151621Binding affinity towards Opioid receptor mu 1 using [3H]DAMGO as radioligand.1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-28, Volume: 38, Issue:9
Enantiomers of diastereomeric cis-N-[1-(2-hydroxy-2-phenylethyl)- 3-methyl-4-piperidyl]-N-phenylpropanamides: synthesis, X-ray analysis, and biological activities.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1285689Half life in mouse liver microsomes at 20 uM preincubated for 15 mins followed by addition of NADPH-regenerating system measured after 5 to 90 mins by UPLC/MC analysis2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 24, Issue:8
Design, physico-chemical properties and biological evaluation of some new N-[(phenoxy)alkyl]- and N-{2-[2-(phenoxy)ethoxy]ethyl}aminoalkanols as anticonvulsant agents.
AID1526816Unbound maximal portal vein concentration of in human at 5 mg, TD2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID178672Antinociceptive activity of compound was assessed by employing the acetylcholine writhing test in rats after po administration.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
Synthesis and stereochemistry of 7-phenyl-2-propionanilidobenzo[a]quinolizidine derivatives. Structural probes of fentanyl analgesics.
AID177738Activity in tail-withdrawing assay1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 29, Issue:6
Probes for narcotic receptor mediated phenomena. 12. cis-(+)-3-Methylfentanyl isothiocyanate, a potent site-directed acylating agent for delta opioid receptors. Synthesis, absolute configuration, and receptor enantioselectivity.
AID1272087Displacement of [3H]DAMGO from mu opioid receptor in rat brain membranes2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
Design synthesis and structure-activity relationship of 5-substituted (tetrahydronaphthalen-2yl)methyl with N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-2-yl)propionamide derivatives as opioid ligands.
AID1526819Cmax in human at 0.5 mg. TM2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1701347Analgesic activity in sc dosed Kunming mouse assessed as time duration during which antinociception lasted by radiant heat tail flick test
AID193083Duration to produce analgesic activity was measured in rats by tail withdrawal reflex test (TWR), administered by intravenous at peak time 4 min (8X MED50 dose)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1813212Toxicity in ICR mouse assessed as induction of sedation by measuring spontaneous locomotor activity at 0.05 mg/kg, sc measured for 15 mins following drug administration2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 226Optimization of bifunctional piperidinamide derivatives as σ
AID1269153Drug metabolism in mouse liver microsomes assessed as N-dealkylated metabolite formation at 20 uM at pH 7.4 incubated for 15 mins by UPLC/MS analysis in presence of NADPH2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
N-Alkylated arylsulfonamides of (aryloxy)ethyl piperidines: 5-HT(7) receptor selectivity versus multireceptor profile.
AID540215Volume of distribution at steady state in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID496824Antimicrobial activity against Toxoplasma gondii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1701326Agonist activity at mu opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293-A cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation incubated for 30 mins by competition PKA binding assay relative to control
AID1269134Drug metabolism in mouse liver microsomes assessed as retention time of N-dealkylated metabolite at 20 uM at pH 7.4 incubated for 15 mins by UPLC/MS analysis in presence of NADPH2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
N-Alkylated arylsulfonamides of (aryloxy)ethyl piperidines: 5-HT(7) receptor selectivity versus multireceptor profile.
AID148995In vitro binding activity against opioid receptor mu using [3H]-DAGO as radioligand1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID150261Binding affinity to opioid receptors by the displacement of [3H]fentanyl in rat brain homogenates1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 24, Issue:7
Opiate receptor interaction of compounds derived from or structurally related to fentanyl.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1813227Analgesic activity in ICR mouse assessed forepaw licking/jumping latency time at 0.1 mg/kg, sc by hot plate test2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 226Optimization of bifunctional piperidinamide derivatives as σ
AID28235Unbound fraction (plasma)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID496831Antimicrobial activity against Cryptosporidium parvum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1573398Agonist activity at human mu opioid receptor expressed in human U2OS cells co-transfected with beta-arrestin-2 assessed as increase in beta-arrestin-2 recruitment after 90 mins by BRET assay relative to control2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Biased Ligands of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs): Structure-Functional Selectivity Relationships (SFSRs) and Therapeutic Potential.
AID174614Duration of action in minutes, 8 times of the ED50 using rat hot flick1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1134015Analgesic activity in mouse assessed as phenylquinone-induced writhing after 10 mins1977Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 20, Issue:4
Synthesis of some conformationally restricted analogues of fentanyl.
AID476637Selectivity ratio of Ki for mu opioid receptor in rat brain membrane to Ki for delta opioid receptor in rat brain membrane2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
"Carba"-analogues of fentanyl are opioid receptor agonists.
AID1526751Inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1526815Unbound Cmax in human at 5 mg, TD2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1701325Agonist activity at mu opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293-A cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation incubated for 30 mins by competition PKA binding assay
AID1215086Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based luminescent analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID1701349Analgesic activity in Kunming mouse at 0.19 umol/kg, sc pre-treated with 1 mg/kg, sc opioid receptor antagonist naloxone by radiant heat tail flick test
AID1855437Toxicity in constipation model of ICR mouse assessed as decrease in number of fecal boli measured after 120 mins
AID1215087Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells assessed as induction of CYP3A4 after 24 hrs by luminescent analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID1581747Antinociceptive activity in Sprague-Dawley rat dosed intravenously using cumulative dosing every 5 mins until rat maxed-out on hot plate co-treated with 0.1 mg/kg naltrexone by hot plate test2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-09, Volume: 63, Issue:1
Investigation of the Adrenergic and Opioid Binding Affinities, Metabolic Stability, Plasma Protein Binding Properties, and Functional Effects of Selected Indole-Based Kratom Alkaloids.
AID1245111Displacement of [3H]-DPDPE from Swiss Webster mouse neural membranes delta opioid receptor after 60 mins by liquid scintillation spectrometric analysis2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 23, Issue:18
Discovery of 5-substituted tetrahydronaphthalen-2yl-methyl with N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-4-yl)propionamide derivatives as potent opioid receptor ligands.
AID1526733Substrate activity at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as increase in compound uptake at 0.5 uM incubated for 2 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control empty vector transfected cells2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID540218Clearance in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1215094Competitive binding affinity to human PXR LBD (111 to 434) by TR-FRET assay2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1526822Ratio of unbound Cmax in human at 0.5 mg. TM to inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID174615Duration of action in minutes, 8 times of the ED50 using rat tail flick1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID1215089Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells assessed as induction of CYP3A4 after 24 hrs by luminescent analysis relative to rifampicin2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID131734Tested for analgesic activity using mouse hot plate technique1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID196020Rotarod index for recovery of motor coordination in rats1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID127629Duration of analgesic effect using mouse hot plate assay1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID476635Displacement of [3H]DSLET from delta opioid receptor in rat brain membrane2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
"Carba"-analogues of fentanyl are opioid receptor agonists.
AID699539Inhibition of human liver OATP1B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in E17-betaG uptake at 20 uM by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID1125358Antinociceptive effect in C57BL/6 mouse assessed as tail withdrawal latency at 0.3 mg/kg, ip up to 120 mins followed by treated with second dose measured up to 220 mins by acute tolerance/warm water tail withdrawal assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 57, Issue:7
Development of a bioavailable μ opioid receptor (MOPr) agonist, δ opioid receptor (DOPr) antagonist peptide that evokes antinociception without development of acute tolerance.
AID1701373Toxicity in Kunming mouse assessed as increase in jumping counts after naloxone-injection at 0.19 umol/kg, sc by naloxone-precipitated withdrawal test
AID184604Acute toxicity was measured after sc administration of several dose levels (1,3,10,30,100,300, and 1000 mg/kg) for 5 days1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
Synthesis and stereochemistry of 7-phenyl-2-propionanilidobenzo[a]quinolizidine derivatives. Structural probes of fentanyl analgesics.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1247885Displacement of [3H] DAMGO from rat mu-opioid receptor2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:20
Design and synthesis of novel bivalent ligands (MOR and DOR) by conjugation of enkephalin analogues with 4-anilidopiperidine derivatives.
AID1272081Agonist activity at mu opioid receptor in guinea pig isolated ileum assessed as inhibition of electric stimulation-induced contraction2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
Design synthesis and structure-activity relationship of 5-substituted (tetrahydronaphthalen-2yl)methyl with N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-2-yl)propionamide derivatives as opioid ligands.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1700444Induction of respiratory depression in Long Evans rat assessed as reduction in respiratory rate at 20 ug/kg, iv administered via bolus by pulse-oximeter2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-25, Volume: 63, Issue:22
Synthesis and Pharmacology of a Novel μ-δ Opioid Receptor Heteromer-Selective Agonist Based on the Carfentanyl Template.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID178674Antinociceptive activity of compound was assessed by employing the haffner tail-clip in rats test after po administration1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
Synthesis and stereochemistry of 7-phenyl-2-propionanilidobenzo[a]quinolizidine derivatives. Structural probes of fentanyl analgesics.
AID137451Ability of compound for reversal of morphine and analgesia was determined; 0= no reversal observed.1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
New 4-(heteroanilido)piperidines, structurally related to the pure opioid agonist fentanyl, with agonist and/or antagonist properties.
AID1573396Agonist activity at human mu opioid receptor expressed in CHO cell membranes after 1 hr by [35S]-GTPgammaS binding assay relative to control2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Biased Ligands of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs): Structure-Functional Selectivity Relationships (SFSRs) and Therapeutic Potential.
AID150260Displacement of [3H]naloxone from rat brain Opioid receptors1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
Synthesis and stereochemistry of 7-phenyl-2-propionanilidobenzo[a]quinolizidine derivatives. Structural probes of fentanyl analgesics.
AID540217Volume of distribution at steady state in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID1433437Antinociceptive activity in CD-1 mouse mechanical stimulus-induced nociception model assessed as struggle response latency time at 0.16 mg/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to test by paw pressure test
AID1736834Inhibition of sigma 1 receptor (unknown origin)2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-01, Volume: 191Piperidine propionamide as a scaffold for potent sigma-1 receptor antagonists and mu opioid receptor agonists for treating neuropathic pain.
AID1125359Antinociceptive effect in C57BL/6 mouse assessed as tail withdrawal latency at 0.3 mg/kg, ip up to 120 mins by acute tolerance/warm water tail withdrawal assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-10, Volume: 57, Issue:7
Development of a bioavailable μ opioid receptor (MOPr) agonist, δ opioid receptor (DOPr) antagonist peptide that evokes antinociception without development of acute tolerance.
AID496825Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania mexicana2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1855434Antinociceptive activity in ICR mouse assessed as reduction in acetic acid induced writhing response at 0.05 mg/kg, sc administered 5 mins prior to acetic acid administration and 5 mins post naloxone administration and measured by abdominal constriction t
AID496830Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania major2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID540216Clearance in dog after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID174613Duration of action in minutes, 2 times of the ED50 using rat tail flick1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID1855427Antinociceptive activity against formalin-induced nociceptive behavior in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as reduction in phase 1 hind paw flinching at 0.05 mg/kg, sc administered 5 mins prior to formalin challenge by formalin test
AID1701346Analgesic activity in sc dosed Kunming mouse by radiant heat tail flick test
AID1823672Displacement of [3H]-N-methylspiperone from human dopamine D2 receptor expressed in HEK293 cell membranes incubated for 60 mins by microbeta scintillation counting analysis
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID496828Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania donovani2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID603953In-vivo plasma to lung partition coefficients of the compound, logP(lung) in rat2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 43, Issue:3
Air to lung partition coefficients for volatile organic compounds and blood to lung partition coefficients for volatile organic compounds and drugs.
AID1245113Agonist activity at mu opioid receptor in beta-funaltrexamine-treated guinea pig isolated ileum2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 23, Issue:18
Discovery of 5-substituted tetrahydronaphthalen-2yl-methyl with N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-4-yl)propionamide derivatives as potent opioid receptor ligands.
AID177922Analgesic effect calculated using in vivo rat tail withdrawal assay.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 34, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of ultrashort- to long-acting opioid analgetics.
AID1855413Ratio of Ki for [3H]-DAMGO from human MOR expressed in CHO-K1 cell membranes to Ki for displacement of [3H](+)-pentazocine from sigma 1 receptor in guinea pig brain membranes
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID174612Duration of action in minutes, 2 times of the ED50 using rat hot flick1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID1269151Metabolic stability in mouse liver microsomes assessed as retention time of compound at 20 uM at pH 7.4 incubated for 15 mins by UPLC/MS analysis in presence of NADPH2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
N-Alkylated arylsulfonamides of (aryloxy)ethyl piperidines: 5-HT(7) receptor selectivity versus multireceptor profile.
AID1245110Displacement of [3H]-DAMGO from Swiss Webster mouse neural membranes mu opioid receptor after 60 mins by liquid scintillation spectrometric analysis2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Sep-15, Volume: 23, Issue:18
Discovery of 5-substituted tetrahydronaphthalen-2yl-methyl with N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-4-yl)propionamide derivatives as potent opioid receptor ligands.
AID1813228Analgesic activity in chronic constriction injury-induced inflammatory mechanical allodynia ICR mouse model assessed as inhibition of mechanical allodynia at 0.05 mg/kg, sc2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 226Optimization of bifunctional piperidinamide derivatives as σ
AID178398Effective dose for its analgesic activity in male Sprague-Dawley rats using rat hot plate assay1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 32, Issue:12
4-Phenyl- and 4-heteroaryl-4-anilidopiperidines. A novel class of analgesic and anesthetic agents.
AID29925Volume of distribution in man (IV dose)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID149784Binding affinity towards Opioid receptor delta 1 using [3H]DADLE as radioligand.1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-28, Volume: 38, Issue:9
Enantiomers of diastereomeric cis-N-[1-(2-hydroxy-2-phenylethyl)- 3-methyl-4-piperidyl]-N-phenylpropanamides: synthesis, X-ray analysis, and biological activities.
AID1823675Displacement of [3H]-N-methylspiperone from human dopamine D4 receptor expressed in HEK293 cell membranes incubated for 60 mins by microbeta scintillation counting analysis
AID151606Inhibition of [3H]DAMGO binding to mu opioid receptor of rat brain membranes2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
3-(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-hydroxybenzyl)-N-alkyl-N-arylbenzamides: potent, non-peptidic agonists of both the micro and delta opioid receptors.
AID1526823Ratio of unbound maximal portal vein concentration in human at 0.5 mg. TM to inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID180353The compound was tested for analgesic activity by using rat tail withdrawal test2000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-04, Volume: 10, Issue:17
The synthesis and preliminary pharmacological evaluation of 4-methyl fentanyl.
AID73902Inhibition of electrically evoked contraction in guinea pig ileum determined in vitro1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 34, Issue:7
Design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of ultrashort- to long-acting opioid analgetics.
AID1433439Antinociceptive activity in CD-1 mouse mechanical stimulus-induced nociception model assessed as struggle response latency time at 0.16 mg/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to test in presence of peripherally restricted opioid antagonist Nx-M by paw press
AID1433438Antinociceptive activity in CD-1 mouse mechanical stimulus-induced nociception model assessed as struggle response latency time at 0.16 mg/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to test in presence of centrally penetrant opioid antagonist Nx by paw pressure te
AID224581Compound was tested for its ability to stimulate [35S]GTP-gamma-S, binding to membranes from C6 glioma cells stably expressing rat mu opioid receptor1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-06, Volume: 8, Issue:19
Design of a high affinity peptidomimetic opioid agonist from peptide pharmacophore models.
AID540220Clearance in human after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1701351Analgesic activity in Kunming mouse at 0.19 umol/kg, sc pre-treated with 5 nmol, icv peripherally restricted opioid receptor antagonist naloxone methiodide by radiant heat tail flick test
AID177756Analgesic activity at 1 min following injection at 1 mg/kg into the lateral tail vein of the rat (55 degree Centigrade hot plate assay)1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID149047In vivo binding affinity to opioid receptor preparations from rat brain1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 29, Issue:6
Probes for narcotic receptor mediated phenomena. 12. cis-(+)-3-Methylfentanyl isothiocyanate, a potent site-directed acylating agent for delta opioid receptors. Synthesis, absolute configuration, and receptor enantioselectivity.
AID193082Duration to produce analgesic activity was measured in rats by tail withdrawal reflex test (TWR), administered by intravenous at peak time 4 min (4 X MED50 dose)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID151590Ability to displace [3H]naloxone from the Opioid receptor mu 1 isolated from the rat brain membranes.1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID1572983Binding affinity to mu opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK cells at pH 7.42018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Fluorine and Fluorinated Motifs in the Design and Application of Bioisosteres for Drug Design.
AID1526731Substrate activity at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as increase in compound uptake at 0.05 uM incubated for 2 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control empty vector transfected cells2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID539471Solubility of the compound at pH 7.042010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 20, Issue:24
Experimental solubility profiling of marketed CNS drugs, exploring solubility limit of CNS discovery candidate.
AID149185In vitro binding activity against opioid receptor delta using [3DPDPE] as radioligand1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID386623Inhibition of 4-(4-(dimethylamino)styryl)-N-methylpyridinium uptake at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells at 100 uM by confocal microscopy2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 51, Issue:19
Structural requirements for drug inhibition of the liver specific human organic cation transport protein 1.
AID150408Potency for rat opioid receptors relative to morphine1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 24, Issue:7
Opiate receptor interaction of compounds derived from or structurally related to fentanyl.
AID1526732Substrate activity at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as increase in compound uptake at 0.1 uM incubated for 2 mins by LC-MS/MS analysis relative to control empty vector transfected cells2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID129027Percentage analgesia determined by mouse hot plate assay (1 mg/kg)1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
New 4-(heteroanilido)piperidines, structurally related to the pure opioid agonist fentanyl, with agonist and/or antagonist properties.
AID129029Percentage analgesia of determined by mouse hot plate assay (5 mg/kg)1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
New 4-(heteroanilido)piperidines, structurally related to the pure opioid agonist fentanyl, with agonist and/or antagonist properties.
AID189327Analgesic activity by observing the recovery of motor coordination in rats1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 32, Issue:12
4-Phenyl- and 4-heteroaryl-4-anilidopiperidines. A novel class of analgesic and anesthetic agents.
AID1526818Ratio of unbound maximal portal vein concentration in human at 5 mg, TD to inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1572978Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-26, Volume: 61, Issue:14
Fluorine and Fluorinated Motifs in the Design and Application of Bioisosteres for Drug Design.
AID749871Inhibition of delta opioid receptor in mouse vas deferens assessed as inhibition of electrically-stimulated muscle contraction2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 23, Issue:11
Effect of anchoring 4-anilidopiperidines to opioid peptides.
AID496826Antimicrobial activity against Entamoeba histolytica2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID129194Time from loss of righting (LOR) to that of righting occurance in anesthetic mouse1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID128340Analgesic activity in a standard mouse hot plate assay1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID223244Displacement of [3H]2-BFI (1 nM) from imidazoline receptor I-2 in human brain2004Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-19, Volume: 14, Issue:2
Fentanyl derivatives bearing aliphatic alkaneguanidinium moieties: a new series of hybrid molecules with significant binding affinity for mu-opioid receptors and I2-imidazoline binding sites.
AID1581745Antinociceptive activity in Sprague-Dawley rat dosed intravenously using cumulative dosing every 5 mins until rat maxed-out on hot plate by hot plate test2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 01-09, Volume: 63, Issue:1
Investigation of the Adrenergic and Opioid Binding Affinities, Metabolic Stability, Plasma Protein Binding Properties, and Functional Effects of Selected Indole-Based Kratom Alkaloids.
AID174609Duration of action for the lost of righting in rats following intravenous administration of compound1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID749874Inhibition of mu opioid receptor in guinea pig ileum assessed as inhibition of electrically-stimulated muscle contraction2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-01, Volume: 23, Issue:11
Effect of anchoring 4-anilidopiperidines to opioid peptides.
AID697786Antagonist activity at H1 receptor in human HeLa cells assessed as inhibition of histamine-induced Ca2+ release by using fura-2AM-based fluorescence assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-23, Volume: 55, Issue:16
Shape-based reprofiling of FDA-approved drugs for the H₁ histamine receptor.
AID1701366Analgesic activity in sc dosed Kunming mouse dosed once daily for 4 consecutive days by radiant heat tail flick test
AID1573395Agonist activity at human mu opioid receptor expressed in CHO cell membranes after 1 hr by [35S]-GTPgammaS binding assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Biased Ligands of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs): Structure-Functional Selectivity Relationships (SFSRs) and Therapeutic Potential.
AID149261Binding affinity towards Opioid receptor kappa 1 using [3H]U-69593 as radioligand.1995Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-28, Volume: 38, Issue:9
Enantiomers of diastereomeric cis-N-[1-(2-hydroxy-2-phenylethyl)- 3-methyl-4-piperidyl]-N-phenylpropanamides: synthesis, X-ray analysis, and biological activities.
AID148708Binding affinity against Opioid receptor kappa 12000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-10, Volume: 43, Issue:3
Molecular docking reveals a novel binding site model for fentanyl at the mu-opioid receptor.
AID174638Duration to produce analgesic activity was measured in rats by tail withdrawal reflex test (TWR), intravenous administration.1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID178022Effective dose for analgesic activity in male Sprague-Dawley rats, using tail-flick method1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 32, Issue:12
4-Phenyl- and 4-heteroaryl-4-anilidopiperidines. A novel class of analgesic and anesthetic agents.
AID1823674Displacement of [3H]-N-methylspiperone from human dopamine D3 receptor expressed in HEK293 cell membranes incubated for 60 mins by microbeta scintillation counting analysis
AID26789Partition coefficient (logP)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID476638Selectivity ratio of Ki for mu opioid receptor in rat brain membrane to Ki for kappa opioid receptor in guinea pig brain membrane2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
"Carba"-analogues of fentanyl are opioid receptor agonists.
AID1809499Partial agonist activity at human MOR expressed in HEK293T cells co-expressing beta-arrestin1 assessed as beta-arrestin1 recruitment by BRET assay relative to control2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-23, Volume: 64, Issue:18
A Novel Mitragynine Analog with Low-Efficacy Mu Opioid Receptor Agonism Displays Antinociception with Attenuated Adverse Effects.
AID1809493Partial agonist activity at human MOR expressed in HEK293T cells co-expressing beta-arrestin2 EFC assessed as beta-arrestin2 recruitment by BRET assay relative to control2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-23, Volume: 64, Issue:18
A Novel Mitragynine Analog with Low-Efficacy Mu Opioid Receptor Agonism Displays Antinociception with Attenuated Adverse Effects.
AID147962In vitro binding activity against opioid receptor kappa using [3H]EKC as radioligand1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID196361Recovery of motor co-ordination after intravenous injection of ED100 and regaining of righting after 180 seconds later.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID29423HPLC capacity factor (k')2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID539464Solubility of the compound in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at 600 uM at pH 7.4 after 24 hrs by LC/MS/MS analysis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-15, Volume: 20, Issue:24
Experimental solubility profiling of marketed CNS drugs, exploring solubility limit of CNS discovery candidate.
AID150397Displacement [3H]naloxone from rat-brain Opioid receptors1982Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 25, Issue:8
Potential affinity labels for the opiate receptor based on fentanyl and related compounds.
AID150088Binding affinity against Opioid receptor delta 12000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-10, Volume: 43, Issue:3
Molecular docking reveals a novel binding site model for fentanyl at the mu-opioid receptor.
AID497005Antimicrobial activity against Pneumocystis carinii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID26362Ionization constant (pKa)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID1576134Displacement of [3H]DAMGO from rat brain mu opioid receptor incubated for 60 mins by microbeta scintillation counting method2019MedChemComm, Jul-01, Volume: 10, Issue:7
Affinity of fentanyl and its derivatives for the σ
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID496819Antimicrobial activity against Plasmodium falciparum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID149117Binding affinity against Opioid receptor kappa 1 in guinea pig brain membranes1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-06, Volume: 8, Issue:19
Design of a high affinity peptidomimetic opioid agonist from peptide pharmacophore models.
AID1433424Antinociceptive activity in CD-1 mouse mechanical stimulus-induced nociception model assessed as struggle response latency at 0.12 mg/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to test in presence of centrally penetrant opioid antagonist Nx by paw pressure test
AID114189Analgesic activity in nonfasted male mice at 55 degree C using Hot plate assay1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 32, Issue:12
4-Phenyl- and 4-heteroaryl-4-anilidopiperidines. A novel class of analgesic and anesthetic agents.
AID1855424Antinociceptive activity in ICR mouse assessed as reduction in acetic acid induced writhing response at 10 to 50 ug/kg, sc administered 5 mins prior to acetic acid administration and measured by abdominal constriction test
AID1269136Intrinsic clearance in mouse liver microsomes at 20 uM at pH 7.4 incubated for 15 mins by UPLC/MS analysis in presence of NADPH2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
N-Alkylated arylsulfonamides of (aryloxy)ethyl piperidines: 5-HT(7) receptor selectivity versus multireceptor profile.
AID1809491Agonist activity at human MOR expressed in HEK293T cells co-expressing Galpha-RLuc8:Gbeta:Ggamma-GFP2 assessed as maximal Gi-1 activation measured after 15 mins by BRET assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-23, Volume: 64, Issue:18
A Novel Mitragynine Analog with Low-Efficacy Mu Opioid Receptor Agonism Displays Antinociception with Attenuated Adverse Effects.
AID150396Displacement of [3H]nalotrexone from rat-brain Opioid receptors1982Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 25, Issue:8
Potential affinity labels for the opiate receptor based on fentanyl and related compounds.
AID196363Recovery of motor co-ordination after intravenous injection of ED100 and regaining of righting immediately.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID1823673Displacement of [3H]DAMGO from human mu opioid receptor expressed in HEK293 cell membrane incubated for 60 mins by radioligand binding assay
AID1701330Agonist activity at delta opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293-A cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation incubated for 30 mins by competition PKA binding assay relative to control
AID113103Analgesic activity was evaluated by tail-flick assay in mice after subcutaneous administration.1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 23, Issue:8
4-Anilidopiperidine analgesics. 3. 1-Substituted 4-(propananilido)perhydroazepines as ring-expanded analogues.
AID28236Unbound fraction (tissues)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID78840Inhibition of the electrically induced muscle contractions was determined using the guinea pig ileum2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
3-(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-hydroxybenzyl)-N-alkyl-N-arylbenzamides: potent, non-peptidic agonists of both the micro and delta opioid receptors.
AID496823Antimicrobial activity against Trichomonas vaginalis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID540214Clearance in rat after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID660338Clearance in human liver microsomes at 1 uM2011ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-11, Volume: 2, Issue:8
Metabolism of 4-Aminopiperidine Drugs by Cytochrome P450s: Molecular and Quantum Mechanical Insights into Drug Design.
AID1247890Agonist activity at mu opioid receptor in guinea pig ileum assessed as inhibition of electrically stimulated muscle contraction2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-15, Volume: 25, Issue:20
Design and synthesis of novel bivalent ligands (MOR and DOR) by conjugation of enkephalin analogues with 4-anilidopiperidine derivatives.
AID1701364Analgesic activity in icv dosed Kunming mouse dosed once daily for 8 consecutive days by radiant heat tail flick test
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1855443Toxicity in ICR mouse model assessed as respiratory depression at 0.05 mg/kg, sc by WBP test
AID1855412Displacement of [3H]-DAMGO from human MOR expressed in CHO-K1 cell membranes incubated for 90 mins measured by MicroBeta scintillation counter method
AID697788Antagonist activity at P2Y receptor in human HeLa cells assessed as inhibition of ATP-induced Ca2+ release at 100 uM by using fura-2AM-based fluorescence assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-23, Volume: 55, Issue:16
Shape-based reprofiling of FDA-approved drugs for the H₁ histamine receptor.
AID1526821Unbound maximal portal vein concentration of in human at 0.5 mg. TM2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID152239Binding affinity against mu-opiate receptor (human) using [3H]DAMGO radioligand2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 44, Issue:21
From hit to lead. Combining two complementary methods for focused library design. Application to mu opiate ligands.
AID496827Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania amazonensis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID23709Apparent coefficient between heptane and water at 37 degree centigrades at pH 7.41986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID178673Antinociceptive activity of compound was assessed by employing the acetylcholine writhing test in rats after sc administration.1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
Synthesis and stereochemistry of 7-phenyl-2-propionanilidobenzo[a]quinolizidine derivatives. Structural probes of fentanyl analgesics.
AID28233Fraction ionized (pH 7.4)2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-20, Volume: 45, Issue:13
Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID189462Tested for anesthetic activity in the loss of righting test (LOR) in rats at dose 0.0209 mg/kg1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID1701365Analgesic activity in sc dosed Kunming mouse dosed once daily for 8 consecutive days by radiant heat tail flick test
AID311367Permeability coefficient in human skin2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 15, Issue:22
Transdermal penetration behaviour of drugs: CART-clustering, QSPR and selection of model compounds.
AID147859Binding affinity against opioid receptor kappa 1 using [3H]- U-69,593 radioligand2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 44, Issue:21
From hit to lead. Combining two complementary methods for focused library design. Application to mu opiate ligands.
AID134893Dose required to produce loss of righting (LOR) in anesthetic mouse1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID1215096Activation of human PXR expressed in human HepG2 (DPX-2) cells after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based luminescent analysis relative to rifampicin2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID179544General recovery of motor activity in minutes.1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID176817Tested for analgesic activity using rat tail flick technique1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID540219Volume of distribution at steady state in monkey after iv administration2005Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, Jul, Volume: 94, Issue:7
Extrapolation of human pharmacokinetic parameters from rat, dog, and monkey data: Molecular properties associated with extrapolative success or failure.
AID176385Equiefficacious dose for the lost of righting (LOR) in rats following intravenous administration of compound1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID177758Analgesic activity determined by the rat hotplate assay by injection at the lateral tail vein1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID1526817Ratio of unbound Cmax in human at 5 mg, TD to inhibition of human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells assessed as reduction in ASP+ substrate uptake by microplate reader based analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID175139Compound was tested for analgesic activity in rat, measured as duration of action; range is 30-402000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-04, Volume: 10, Issue:17
The synthesis and preliminary pharmacological evaluation of 4-methyl fentanyl.
AID1215095Competitive binding affinity to human PXR LBD (111 to 434) by TR-FRET assay relative to SR128132011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID1526752Passive membrane permeability by LC-MS/MS analysis based PAMPA2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID1701327Agonist activity at kappa opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293-A cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation incubated for 30 mins by competition PKA binding assay
AID243151Inhibitory concentration against potassium channel HERG2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-02, Volume: 15, Issue:11
A discriminant model constructed by the support vector machine method for HERG potassium channel inhibitors.
AID1701328Agonist activity at kappa opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293-A cells assessed as inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation incubated for 30 mins by competition PKA binding assay relative to control
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1701363Analgesic activity in icv dosed Kunming mouse dosed once daily for 4 consecutive days by radiant heat tail flick test
AID699541Inhibition of human liver OATP2B1 expressed in HEK293 Flp-In cells assessed as reduction in [3H]E3S uptake at 20 uM incubated for 5 mins by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-24, Volume: 55, Issue:10
Classification of inhibitors of hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs): influence of protein expression on drug-drug interactions.
AID177759Analgesic activity determined by the rat tail flick assay by injection at the lateral tail vein1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 34, Issue:2
New 1-(heterocyclylalkyl)-4-(propionanilido)-4-piperidinyl methyl ester and methylene methyl ether analgesics.
AID131732Analgesic activity using mouse hot plate technique at 55 degree Centigrade1990Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct, Volume: 33, Issue:10
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of new 3-methyl-1,4-disubstituted-piperidine analgesics.
AID476632Agonist activity at mu opioid receptor in guinea pig ileum assessed as inhibition of electrically-stimulated muscle contraction2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
"Carba"-analogues of fentanyl are opioid receptor agonists.
AID149667Binding affinity of compound evaluated for Opioid receptor delta 1 isolated from rat brain2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
3-(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-hydroxybenzyl)-N-alkyl-N-arylbenzamides: potent, non-peptidic agonists of both the micro and delta opioid receptors.
AID1526820Unbound Cmax in human at 0.5 mg. TM2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-14, Volume: 62, Issue:21
Opioids as Substrates and Inhibitors of the Genetically Highly Variable Organic Cation Transporter OCT1.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID25826Partition coefficient at 25 degree centigrades1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID193081Duration to produce analgesic activity was measured in rats by tail withdrawal reflex test (TWR), administered by intravenous at peak time 4 min (32 X MED50 dose)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID1855430Antinociceptive activity against formalin-induced nociceptive behavior in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as reduction in phase 2 hind paw flinching at 0.05 mg/kg, sc administered 5 mins prior to formalin challenge by formalin test
AID697787Displacement of [3H]mepyramine from histamine H1 receptor in Sprague-Dawley rat brain membrane after 2 hr by scintillation counting2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-23, Volume: 55, Issue:16
Shape-based reprofiling of FDA-approved drugs for the H₁ histamine receptor.
AID224569Binding affinity against mu opioid receptor in guinea pig brain membranes1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-06, Volume: 8, Issue:19
Design of a high affinity peptidomimetic opioid agonist from peptide pharmacophore models.
AID193080Duration to produce analgesic activity was measured in rats by tail withdrawal reflex test (TWR), administered by intravenous at peak time 4 min (2 X MED50 dose)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID1576130Displacement of [3H]PPP from sigma1 receptor (unknown origin)2019MedChemComm, Jul-01, Volume: 10, Issue:7
Affinity of fentanyl and its derivatives for the σ
AID679130TP_TRANSPORTER: inhibition of Digoxin transepithelial transport (basal to apical) (Digoxin: 5 uM) in Caco-2 cells2002Anesthesiology, Apr, Volume: 96, Issue:4
Interaction of morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, alfentanil, and loperamide with the efflux drug transporter P-glycoprotein.
AID1576132Displacement of [3H]pentazocine from LAL/HA/BR guinea pig brain sigma1 receptor incubated for 90 mins by liquid scintillation counting method2019MedChemComm, Jul-01, Volume: 10, Issue:7
Affinity of fentanyl and its derivatives for the σ
AID150412In vitro affinity to displace [3H]naloxone from opiate receptor in freshly prepared rat brain homogenates1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 32, Issue:5
Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 4,4-disubstituted piperidines.
AID149771Binding affinity against Opioid receptor delta 1 in guinea pig brain membranes1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-06, Volume: 8, Issue:19
Design of a high affinity peptidomimetic opioid agonist from peptide pharmacophore models.
AID76095Inhibition of opioid activity in electricaly stimulated myenteric plexus longitudinal muscle of guinea pig ileum(GPI) preparation1983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 26, Issue:3
Synthesis and evaluation of 1- and 2-substituted fentanyl analogues for opioid activity.
AID476634Displacement of [3H]DAMGO from mu opioid receptor in rat brain membrane2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-08, Volume: 53, Issue:7
"Carba"-analogues of fentanyl are opioid receptor agonists.
AID496818Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID132687Inhibition of opioid activity in electricaly stimulated myenteric plexus longitudinal muscle of mouse vas deferens(MVD) preparation1983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 26, Issue:3
Synthesis and evaluation of 1- and 2-substituted fentanyl analogues for opioid activity.
AID165437Tested in rabbit for percentage of respirations per minute after treatment with compound or morphine when compared to control; No= absolutely no % change1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
New 4-(heteroanilido)piperidines, structurally related to the pure opioid agonist fentanyl, with agonist and/or antagonist properties.
AID1701345Analgesic activity in Kunming mouse assessed as increase in antinociceptive effect at 0.03 pmol, icv pre-treated with 10 nmol, icv NPFF receptor antagonist RF9 by radiant heat tail flick test
AID1855411Displacement of [3H](+)-pentazocine from sigma 1 receptor in guinea pig brain membranes by microbeta scintillation counting method
AID1855436Toxicity in ICR mouse assessed as effect on locomotor activity at 0.05 mg/kg, sc measured by open field test
AID1433442Antinociceptive activity in CD-1 mouse mechanical stimulus-induced nociception model assessed as struggle response latency time at 0.08 mg/kg, sc administered 30 mins prior to test in presence of sigma1 receptor antagonist BD-1063 by paw pressure test
AID185210Morphinomimetic activity was determined in rats by tail withdrawal reflex test (TWR), administered by intravenous.1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 29, Issue:11
Synthetic 1,4-disubstituted-1,4-dihydro-5H-tetrazol-5-one derivatives of fentanyl: alfentanil (R 39209), a potent, extremely short-acting narcotic analgesic.
AID1512057Agonist activity at Gi-coupled mu opioid receptor (unknown origin) expressed in HEK293T cells assessed as inhibition of cAMP production at pH 7.4 measured after 15 mins by Glo-Sensor assay2019ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-12, Volume: 10, Issue:9
β-Fluorofentanyls Are pH-Sensitive Mu Opioid Receptor Agonists.
AID1917880Displacement of [3H]DAMGO from human mu opioid receptor measured after 2 hrs by competitive binding assay2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-27, Volume: 65, Issue:20
Recent Scaffold Hopping Applications in Central Nervous System Drug Discovery.
AID496820Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1285690Intrinsic clearance in mouse liver microsomes at 20 uM preincubated for 15 mins followed by addition of NADPH-regenerating system measured after 5 to 90 mins by UPLC/MC analysiS2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 24, Issue:8
Design, physico-chemical properties and biological evaluation of some new N-[(phenoxy)alkyl]- and N-{2-[2-(phenoxy)ethoxy]ethyl}aminoalkanols as anticonvulsant agents.
AID151900Displacement [3H]-naloxone from the Opioid receptor mu 1 isolated from rat brain membrane.1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
New 4-(heteroanilido)piperidines, structurally related to the pure opioid agonist fentanyl, with agonist and/or antagonist properties.
AID178675Antinociceptive activity of compound was assessed by employing the haffner tail-clip in rats test after sc administration1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 24, Issue:1
Synthesis and stereochemistry of 7-phenyl-2-propionanilidobenzo[a]quinolizidine derivatives. Structural probes of fentanyl analgesics.
AID1576131Displacement of [3H]SKF10047 from rat brain sigma1 receptor incubated for 35 mins by scintillation counting method2019MedChemComm, Jul-01, Volume: 10, Issue:7
Affinity of fentanyl and its derivatives for the σ
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID165435Percentage analgesia after treatment with compound or morphine in rabbit1989Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 32, Issue:3
New 4-(heteroanilido)piperidines, structurally related to the pure opioid agonist fentanyl, with agonist and/or antagonist properties.
AID190791Compound was tested for analgesic activity, measured as the time of peak action in rat; range is 10-152000Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-04, Volume: 10, Issue:17
The synthesis and preliminary pharmacological evaluation of 4-methyl fentanyl.
AID148078Binding affinity against delta-opiate receptor (human) using [3H]-DPDPE radioligand2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-11, Volume: 44, Issue:21
From hit to lead. Combining two complementary methods for focused library design. Application to mu opiate ligands.
AID660343Drug metabolism in human liver microsomes assessed as CYP3A4-mediated N-dealkylated norfentanyl metabolite formation2011ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-11, Volume: 2, Issue:8
Metabolism of 4-Aminopiperidine Drugs by Cytochrome P450s: Molecular and Quantum Mechanical Insights into Drug Design.
AID1063513Antinociceptive activity in sc dosed mouse by tail flick test2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
Synthesis and antinociceptive properties of N-phenyl-N-(1-(2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl)azepane-4-yl)propionamide in the mouse tail-flick and hot-plate tests.
AID496821Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1215093Activation of rat PXR expressed in human HepG2 cells up to 46 uM after 24 hrs by luciferase reporter gene based luminescent analysis2011Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.
AID1272083Agonist activity at delta opioid receptor in mouse vas deferens assessed as inhibition of electric stimulation-induced contraction2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 24, Issue:2
Design synthesis and structure-activity relationship of 5-substituted (tetrahydronaphthalen-2yl)methyl with N-phenyl-N-(piperidin-2-yl)propionamide derivatives as opioid ligands.
AID138330Inhibition of the electrically induced muscle contractions was determined using the mouse vas deferens2003Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-13, Volume: 46, Issue:4
3-(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-hydroxybenzyl)-N-alkyl-N-arylbenzamides: potent, non-peptidic agonists of both the micro and delta opioid receptors.
AID1701369Toxicity in Kunming mouse assessed as increase in total travelled distance at 0.19 umol/kg, sc by open field assay
AID1346329Human kappa receptor (Opioid receptors)1998NIDA research monograph, Mar, Volume: 178Standard binding and functional assays related to medications development division testing for potential cocaine and opiate narcotic treatment medications.
AID1346361Human delta receptor (Opioid receptors)1998NIDA research monograph, Mar, Volume: 178Standard binding and functional assays related to medications development division testing for potential cocaine and opiate narcotic treatment medications.
AID1346400Rat mu receptor (Opioid receptors)1994Molecular pharmacology, Feb, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Pharmacological characterization of the cloned kappa-, delta-, and mu-opioid receptors.
AID1346364Human mu receptor (Opioid receptors)1998NIDA research monograph, Mar, Volume: 178Standard binding and functional assays related to medications development division testing for potential cocaine and opiate narcotic treatment medications.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (13,947)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19903405 (24.41)18.7374
1990's2771 (19.87)18.2507
2000's2944 (21.11)29.6817
2010's3284 (23.55)24.3611
2020's1543 (11.06)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 126.27

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index126.27 (24.57)
Research Supply Index9.88 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.63 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index243.05 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (126.27)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials4,310 (28.19%)5.53%
Reviews709 (4.64%)6.00%
Case Studies1,513 (9.90%)4.05%
Observational142 (0.93%)0.25%
Other8,614 (56.34%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (886)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Fentanyl Versus Ketamine Supplementation for Prpofol Anesthesia During Balloon Insertion in Morbidly Obese Patients [NCT03747094]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-01Not yet recruiting
Single-Dose, Open-Label, Two-Period, Two-Treatment, Two-Sequence Crossover Exploratory Bioavailability Study of Subsys® (Fentanyl Sublingual Spray), 400 mcg, and Fentanyl Citrate Injection 2 mL x 0.05 mg/mL (Total Dose 100 mcg) Under Fasted Conditions [NCT02138396]12 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Compared With Immediate-release Oxycodone for the Management of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid-Tolerant Patient With Chronic Pain [NCT00463047]Phase 3323 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
Cannabidiol as Treatment Intervention for Opioid Relapse [NCT01311778]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Randomized Double Blind Cross-over Trial of Continuous Intrathecal Infusion for Assessing Patients With Chronic Non-cancer Pain Who Would Benefit From Treatment With Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS) Implant [NCT03523000]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-18Completed
NeoFent-I Study; Fentanyl Treatment in Newborn Infants; a Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacogenetic Study. Prestudy to NeoOpioid; No Pain During Infancy by Adapting Off-patent Medicines. EU FP7:HEALTH - 2007-4.2-1 [NCT03897452]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
Determination of Analgesic Equipotent Doses of Inhaled Metoxyflurane vs. Intravenous Fentanyl Using Cold Pressor Test (CPT) in Volunteers: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study. [NCT03894800]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-23Completed
Anesthesia and the Developing Brain: a Comparison of Two Anesthetic Techniques [NCT03882788]153 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-22Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Analysis of Epidural Anesthesia Using Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery. [NCT03307174]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-14Completed
A Randomized Clinical Study to Compare Different Doses of Clonidine to Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing LSCS [NCT01205204]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to This study was registered with Clinical Trials.gov by mistake.)
A Randomized, Control Study to Evaluate Dosing Strategies for Automated Mandatory Intermittent Boluses Technique for Epidural Labour Analgesia [NCT01205360]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Withdrawn
Criteria Based Discharge in Ambulatory Surgery in Children Undergoing Opioid Versus Opioid Free Anesthesia [NCT03979469]Phase 2100 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-01Completed
[NCT01339624]65 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
The Effect of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Remifentanil Infusion on Propofol Requirements During Elective Therapeutic ERCP, as Well on the Recovery, Pain, and Early Cognitive Function: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT01304342]180 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Dose-dependent Effect of Fentanyl on Cough Attenuation During Emergence From General Anaesthesia [NCT01308320]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Transdermal Fentanyl Patch for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT01348984]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine for Post-operative Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgeries [NCT05323214]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-01Recruiting
An Assessment of Fentanyl Dose Requirements in Opioid-maintained Individuals [NCT01358500]24 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-02-29Recruiting
Gabapentin Versus Transdermal Fentanyl Matrix (TDF) for Chronic Neuropathic Pain (of Radicular Origin): A Multicenter Randomized, Parallel Group, Rater Blinded, Non-inferiority Trial [NCT01127100]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
The Effects of Anesthetic Method on Cerebral Oxygen Saturation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Transurethral Surgery [NCT01147146]64 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Comparison of Sufentanil, Fentanyl and Remifentanil in Combination With Midazolam During Bronchoscopy Under Conscious Sedation: A Randomized Double-blind Prospective Study [NCT03901716]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-15Completed
Rapid IV Symptom-inhibited Fentanyl Induction (SIFI) to Facilitate Rotation Onto Oral Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT) [NCT05905367]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-31Not yet recruiting
Hydromorphone for ICU-analgesia in Patients With Non-mechanical Ventilation: A Dose-exploration and Effectiveness Study [NCT04436224]Phase 4530 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-04Recruiting
Impact of Nociceptive-Level (NOL) Intraoperative Guided Analgesia on Pain Scores, Opioid Consumption and Recovery in Postoperative Care Unit in Patients Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery Under General Anesthesia. The NOLGYN Pilot Study [NCT03776838]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Butorphanol Tartrate Injection for the Patients With Mechanical Ventilation:a Randomized and Controlled Trial [NCT05201560]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-31Not yet recruiting
High Dose Epidural Fentanyl for Second Stage Labor Analgesia [NCT03120780]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-26Recruiting
Sublingual Sufentanil vs Intravenous Fentanyl for Acute Pain in the Ambulatory Surgery Center [NCT04177862]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-11Completed
Analgesics in the Pre-hospital Setting: Implications on Hemorrhage Tolerance - Fentanyl [NCT04136548]Phase 1/Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-01Completed
Paravertebral Nerve Blocks in Neonates and Infants Undergoing Repair of Aortic Coarctation, A Pilot Study [NCT03408340]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-18Recruiting
Post Operative Analgesia After Pediatric Hip Surgery - PCA, Epidural or Lumbar Plexus Catheter: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial [NCT03435692]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-15Terminated(stopped due to Funding was exhausted prior to enrolling intended number of patients.)
International Multicenter Single Blind Randomized Clinical Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam and Propofol in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgical Procedures Under General Anesthesia [NCT03669484]Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-22Completed
Anesthesia With Peribulbar Block: Lidocaine-bupivacaine vs Lidocaine-bupivacaine-fentanyl [NCT03713762]Phase 370 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-01Completed
Prospective Comparative Study Between Ultrasound-guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block and the Use of Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Management of Pain in Patients With Multiple Fracture Ribs [NCT05975294]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-31Not yet recruiting
Ketodex Versus Opioid Based Anaesthesia in Cleft Palate Repair [NCT05402189]Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-01Recruiting
Effect of Opioids on Ventilation in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea [NCT03938259]60 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-07-01Completed
Fentanyl Matrix for the Treatment of Pain Caused by Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip: Improvement of Pain and Function: Multicenter, Open-label, Prospective, Observational Study [NCT01119885]742 participants (Actual)Observational2008-08-31Completed
Influence of Adequacy of Anaesthesia Monitoring on Both Operators' and Patients' Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopic Procedures [NCT03922815]158 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Completed
Combined General and Spinal Anesthesia vs. General Anesthesia for Pain Relief During Laparoscopy Gynecological Surgery [NCT01246323]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-11-30Recruiting
Investigation of Analgesic and Anti-hyperalgesic Effect of Opioids in Experimental Pain [NCT00647127]Phase 322 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Propofol and Remifentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl for Diagnostic Colonoscopy in Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis Child A-B [NCT01148277]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-08-31Not yet recruiting
[NCT01157247]88 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Hypokalemia and Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia [NCT01269099]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Designing Optimal Prevention and Management of Postoperative Nausea and Emesis for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy [NCT03435003]Phase 4104 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-28Completed
Fentanyl vs. Low-Dose Ketamine for the Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Aeromedical Patients [NCT01169025]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Withdrawn
An Open-Label, Randomized, Two-Period, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of an Oral Transmucosal Test Troche Formulation of Fentanyl Citrate (400 mcg) Compared to an Equivalent Dose of a Commercially Available Reference Drug Product (Actiq 40 [NCT01173627]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
The Effects of Intrathecal Magnesium and Fentanyl Added to Bupivacaine on Postoperative Analgesic Requirement in Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery [NCT01205997]Phase 1/Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Controlled Trial on Dexmedetomidine for Providing Adequate Sedation and Preserved Neurologic Examination for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke or Cerebral Vasospasm. [NCT01845441]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Terminated(stopped due to The principal investigator left employment at the sponsoring Institution)
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of NALDEBAIN With Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia With Fentanyl for the Treatment of Post-Laparotomy Surgery [NCT03296488]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-17Recruiting
Combined Colloids And Crystalloids Versus Crystalloids in Women With Preeclampsia Undergoing Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03252496]140 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-19Completed
Ketamine-based Versus Opioid-based for Rapid-sequence Induction of Anesthesia in Patients With Septic Shock [NCT03251170]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-25Completed
A Study Examining the Pharmacodynamics Interaction Between Buprenorphine and Fentanyl [NCT03747341]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-22Completed
Effects of Intraoperative Fentanyl Dose on Postoperative Respiratory Complications [NCT03198208]183,396 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2007-01-01Active, not recruiting
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Reduces Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Operation: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04238780]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-20Recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of CA-008 in Subjects Undergoing Complete Abdominoplasty [NCT03789318]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-03Completed
A Single-centre, Randomized Pilot Study on the Effects of Different Premedication Treatments for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) on Pain, Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation and Cortisol Levels in Preterm Infants [NCT03718507]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-20Withdrawn(stopped due to no recrutiment started)
Effect of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Delivery Rate on the Quality of Labour Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03712735]Phase 4390 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-23Completed
A Comparative Study of Fractionated Vs Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Caesarean Section in Patients With Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension [NCT03693638]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-01Completed
Randomized Double-blind Study on Efficacy of iv PCA With Fentanyl or Sufentanil in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Nephrectomy [NCT03171610]82 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-13Completed
A Phase 2 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multiple-Dose, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study of Fentanyl Sublingual Spray for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Post-Operative Pain [NCT02915978]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
[NCT02408146]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Recruiting
Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses With Continuous Epidural Infusion for Maintenance of Labor Analgesia [NCT02949271]Phase 4179 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-08Completed
Ketamine Co-induction for Patients With Major Depressive Disorder; a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03666494]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-12-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy Of Scalp Block And Ultrasound Guided TAP Block With Clonidine As Adjuvant To Ropivacaine Versus Intravenous Fentanyl On Intraoperative Hemodynamics And Perioperative Analgesia In Abdominal Bone Flap Cranioplasties: A Prospective, Randomised, Doub [NCT03667352]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-15Completed
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Endotracheal Intubation for Inhalational Anesthesia Without the Use of Muscle Relaxants or Analgesics [NCT03112564]91 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-01Completed
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Intrathecal Fentanyl Versus Intrathecal Morphine in Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial [NCT04824274]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-12Completed
Use of Durogesic D-TRANS in Cancer Pain Patients With Inadequately Controlled Pain Relief From Weak Opioids [NCT01060124]Phase 4103 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of Intra-muscular Ketamine-ketorolac Versus Fentanyl- Ketorolac for Children Undergoing Bone Marrow Biopsy and Aspiration [NCT03649334]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-26Completed
Effect of Neurostimulator Usage on Block Success in Costoclavicular Block: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05706090]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-01Completed
Comparison of Intrathecal Versus Epidural Fentanyl: Effect of Neuraxial Route of Administration on Fetal Bradycardia in Labor Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia [NCT03623256]Phase 4558 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-28Recruiting
The Effects of Remimazolam Tosilate Sedation Compared With Midazolam Sedation in Dental Patients: A Double Blind, Prospective , Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04602845]Phase 481 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-01Completed
Continuous Epidural Fentanyl Infusion Step-down Tapering Dose; Sole Intraoperative Analgesic Modality for Precious Single Kidney Patient. [NCT03606902]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-10Completed
Ultrasound-guided (US) Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) for Acute Rib Fractures in the Emergency Department (ED) [NCT03619785]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-06Recruiting
Opioid Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia for Improvement of the Surgical Field Condition in Elderly Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery. A Randomized Comparative Study [NCT05577117]Early Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-03Completed
Comparison of Post Anesthetic Recovery Time in Sedated Patients for Colonoscopy: Midazolam and Propofol or Fentanyl and Propofol. [NCT03813303]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-20Completed
Phase IV, Randomized, Parallel Designed, Single Blinded Study, Comparing the Standard and Minidose Spinal Anesthesia Using Marcaine Spinal 0.5% Heavy With Addition of Fentanyl During Cesarean Section [NCT01303731]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Not yet recruiting
Caudal Extradural Catheterization in Pediatric Renal Transplant: Effect on Perioperative Hemodynamics and Pain Scoring. [NCT02037802]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
Opioid Free Versus Opioid Balanced Anesthesia in Middle Ear Surgery. [NCT03809949]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-16Completed
Efficacy of Regional Block of the Nose in Achieving Hypotensive Anaesthesia in Septo-rhinoplasty Surgery [NCT03774693]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-28Active, not recruiting
Intrathecal Plain Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine With or Without Fentanyl for Elective c Section. [NCT01582607]Phase 2/Phase 3130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Recruiting
A Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Use in Intravenous Sedation [NCT03255824]Phase 4144 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-20Completed
Sedation for Colonoscopy Procedures Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol-Fentanyl Infusions: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06148103]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-05Completed
Prehospital Analgesia INtervention Trial (PAIN) [NCT05437575]Phase 3994 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-27Recruiting
An Open Label, Long-term Treatment Evaluation of the Safety of BEMA™ Fentanyl Use for Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Subjects on Chronic Opioid Therapy [NCT00293020]Phase 3244 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Can Fentanyl Lead to Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia in Healthy Volunteers? A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Crossover Study [NCT02252458]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
The Effects of Fentanyl Added to Ropivacaine for Labour Epidural Analgesia on the Progress, Duration or Mode of Delivery: a Randomized, Double Blind Study. [NCT02135224]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-12-31Recruiting
Treatment of Pain in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: is Methadone More Effective Than Fentanyl? [NCT01317589]Phase 4134 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Comparison of Ketamine-propofol Sedation Protocols With Fentanyl-propofol Administered by Endoscopist or Anesthesiologist at Colonoscopy [NCT03607110]120 participants (Actual)Observational2018-03-01Completed
Differential Mechanisms of Dyspnea Relief in Advanced COPD: Opiates vs. Bronchodilators [NCT03405090]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-20Completed
Selective Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Versus Selective Sensory Spinal Anesthesia for Knee Arthroscopy Surgery [NCT01356797]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Assessment of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine in the Management of Postoperative Pain When Combined With Fentanyl in the Patient-controlled Analgesia [NCT01373021]Phase 495 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Opioid Free vs Opioid Based Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Clinical, Randomised Study [NCT04260659]Phase 459 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-04Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Combined Spinal Epidural Versus Dural Puncture Epidural Techniques for Labor Analgesia [NCT05068661]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-21Recruiting
Effect of Opioids on Central Control of Ventilation in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea [NCT05051189]Early Phase 1130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Fentanyl Citrate in Combination With Midazolam in Critically Ill Children With Mechanical Ventilation [NCT02172014]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Rapid-Onset Opioids for Exertional Dyspnea in Cancer Patients [NCT04188418]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-23Recruiting
Clinical Effectiveness of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Peri-operative Analgesia for Nephrectomy/NSS Performed Via Lumbotomy [NCT03887260]42 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-01Recruiting
Magnesium Sulphate Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Propofol for Monitored Anesthesia Care During Burr-hole Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03854812]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Completed
Analgesic Effect Of Intra-articular Dexamethasone Versus Fentanyl Added as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Knee Arthroscopic Surgery [NCT03847792]87 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-31Completed
Pectoralis and Serratus Nerve Blocks for Mastectomy: a Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Controlled Trial [NCT03966326]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-01Recruiting
Patient-controlled Sedation vs Propofol Infusion for ERCP:a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT01079312]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Modulation of Memory and Conditioning by Pain During Sedation With Anesthetics [NCT04062123]Phase 1150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-30Recruiting
[NCT02325882]171 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
The Effect of Oxycodone Hydrochloride on Catheter-related Bladder Discomfort After TURBT Under General Anesthesia [NCT05510986]196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Not yet recruiting
Effect of Epidural Opioid Administered in the First A Period on the Progress of Labour [NCT03344042]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-01Recruiting
Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT03323684]159 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Completed
Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Intra-articular Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Knee Arthroscopy. [NCT04442906]45 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-01Completed
An Analysis of the Functional Benefit, Narcotic Use and Time to Discharge Readiness Following the Implementation of a Comprehensive Pain Management Protocol for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT02474654]Phase 4220 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
The Use of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant for Perioperative Pain Management in Morbidly Obese Adolescents Undergoing Bariatric Surgery [NCT02880540]Phase 326 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Effect of Total Intravenous Anesthesia With Remimazolam vs Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia on Incidence of Emergence Agitation and Complications in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery [NCT05527314]110 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-23Completed
Effects of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Hypertensive Patients-A Single Center,Randomized, Double-blinded,Controlled Study [NCT02224443]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Not yet recruiting
Anesthesiological Strategies in Elective Craniotomy: Randomized, Equivalence, Open Trial [NCT00741351]Phase 3411 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Opioid Free Anesthesia for Upper Limb Surgery in Obese Patients. [NCT05481970]76 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-30Not yet recruiting
Shaping Anesthetic Techniques to Reduce Post-Operative Delirium [NCT03133845]218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block for Robotic Single-port Gynecologic Surgery [NCT02450084]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Using Fentanyl and Propofol for Tracheal Intubation During Sevoflurane Induction Without Muscle Relaxants in Children: a Randomized Prospective Study [NCT02442128]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Fentanyl and Clonidine for Analgesia During Hypothermia in Term Asphyxiated Infants - a Prospective Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic/Pharmacogenetic Observational Study. Cohort 1 in The SANNI Project. [NCT03177980]49 participants (Actual)Observational2017-04-24Completed
The Effect of Preoperative Oral Pregabalin and Intraoperative Fentanyl on Postoperative Analgesia in Diagnostic Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Comparative Study [NCT05150795]Early Phase 180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Recruiting
Comparison Between Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Wound Infiltration for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery [NCT02691572]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Morphine in the Emergency Department Treatment of Severe Painful Sickle Cell Crises in Children [NCT03682211]Phase 431 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-12Completed
An Observation Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Proportional Doses of Painkyl® in Patients With Breakthrough Cancer Pain [NCT05209906]37 participants (Actual)Observational2019-11-06Completed
Use of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Development of Hyperalgesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean [NCT02387060]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-08-31Recruiting
Development of Variable Volume Automated Mandatory Boluses (VVAMB) for Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labour and Delivery [NCT04011150]Phase 3216 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-11Recruiting
Fentanyl Buccal Soluble Films Feasible Dose Range Study for Breakthrough Pain in Taiwanese Cancer Patients [NCT03669263]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-25Completed
A Phase II/III Study of JNS020QD in Cancer Pain Patients - A Dose-Finding, Double-Blind Study of JNS020QD Compared With JNS005 in Patients Previously Untreated With Opioid Analgesics [NCT00644787]Phase 2/Phase 3156 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Epidural Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries [NCT03463083]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-04Completed
Intranasal Fentanyl and Esketamine for Treatment of Acute Pain in Minor Trauma Patients [NCT03421275]Phase 4105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-12-01Recruiting
The Effect of Methadone vs. Fentanyl Administration on Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Controlled Trial [NCT02747875]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Drug Shortage)
Assistant Professor of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management [NCT05850468]140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-31Not yet recruiting
Understanding Opioid Use Before and After Surgery in Norway: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Randomized Double-blind Controlled Study [NCT05639712]Phase 41,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-13Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks Versus Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Resections: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02197988]75 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-03Completed
Effects of Dexmedetomidine Sedation on Delirium and Haemodynamic in Mechanical Ventilated Elderly Patients -a Single Center,Randomized and Controlled Trial [NCT02225210]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Not yet recruiting
Sedation Effect on the Global Quality Colonoscopy [NCT02220530]7,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2014-10-31Enrolling by invitation
The Clinical Research of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Used in Plastic Surgery of Children : A Single Center ,Randomized ,Double-blinded, Controlled Study. [NCT02222636]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Not yet recruiting
Methadone vs. Transdermal Fentanyl for Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome : Comparison of Two Groups of Intubated and Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: Before-after Intervention Study [NCT05697783]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
Opioid vs. Benzodiazepine-based Sedation for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Internal Medicine Ward [NCT04983615]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-01Recruiting
Evaluation of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients Undergoing Kidney Cancer Surgery Depending on the Anaesthesia Method [NCT02988219]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
The Pre-emptive Value of Epidural Calcitonin in Patients With Lower Limb Amputation. A Double Blinded Randomized Study [NCT02115360]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Decreasing the Incidence of Delirium After Cardiac Surgery [NCT02119806]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was never initiated.)
Comparison of the ED95 Dose of 0.075% and 0.1% Bupivacaine for Labour Analgesia in Primigravida. [NCT02116842]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-12-31Recruiting
Post Operative Pain Control: Continuous Infusion of Morphine vs Fentanyl. Clinical Outcomes [NCT02146638]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief During Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) [NCT03491072]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-20Active, not recruiting
Postoperative Consequences of Intraoperative NOL Titration [NCT04679818]Phase 373 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-30Completed
Nebulized Fentanyl for Respiratory Symptoms in Patients With COVID-19 (Ventanyl Trial) [NCT05165992]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-28Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Fusion Operations Under General Anesthesia: Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Intrathecal Morphine [NCT05338320]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-10Recruiting
Effect of Addition of Fentanyl or Dexamethasone or Both to Bupivacaine in Paravertebral Block for Patients Undergoing Major Breast Surgery [NCT03480308]1 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-01Recruiting
Effects of Anesthetic Technique on Natural Killer Cell Population and Cytotoxicity [NCT02669186]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-10Enrolling by invitation
Hemodynamic Effects of Low Dose Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section [NCT02036697]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty with patient recruitment.)
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Versus Fentanyl for Positioning Patients With Hip Fractures for Central Nervous Blockade: a Randomized Trial. [NCT02037633]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial of Cycling Continuous Sedative Infusions in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation [NCT01333059]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Unable to adequately enroll over a reasonable enrollment period.)
Adductor Canal Block: Single Injection vs Catheter for Pain Management of Total Knee Arthroplasty - A Randomized, Unblinded, Non-Inferiority Trial [NCT02798835]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery After Off Pump Cardiac Surgery: A Randomised Trial [NCT05769309]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-22Recruiting
Three-level Injection Paravertebral Block Using Paravertebral Catheter Compared to General Anesthesia in Mastectomy Surgery [NCT02065947]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
[NCT02078583]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Opioid Rotation Compared With Opioid Dose Escalation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain - Open Label, Randomized, Prospective Study [NCT02084355]Phase 3136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Not yet recruiting
[NCT02084589]65 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Impact of Guideline Recommendations for Post-caesarean Analgesia on Pain, Nausea and Pruritus [NCT05659823]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-02Completed
Intrathecal Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Granisetron for the Prevention of Perioperative Nausea and Vomiting During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia [NCT05474001]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Recruiting
Observational Study: The Effect of μ-opioid Receptor Genetic Polymorphism on Neuraxial Opioid Labor Analgesia [NCT02099877]250 participants (Actual)Observational2013-10-31Completed
The Psychological Effects of Different Sedation Protocol on Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill adults-a Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Trial [NCT02123589]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Not yet recruiting
Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration Combined With Monitored Anesthesia Care for Percutaneous Nephrostomy [NCT02121951]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Withdrawn
A Pilot, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Single-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of SUBSYS™ (Fentanyl Sublingual Spray) for the Treatment of Acute Procedure-related Pain in a Monitored Setting [NCT02138409]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor elected not to continue with study.)
Magnesium Sulphate Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Propofol Xylocaine Combination for Conscious Sedation During Chronic Subdural Haematoma Surgery. Comparative Study [NCT03548493]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-10Completed
Safety of Intranasal Fentanyl (PecFent®) in the Treatment of Procedural Pain in the Elderly With or Without Background Treatment. [NCT02298582]Phase 2/Phase 358 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-08Completed
Efficacy of Fentanyl to Reduce the Time of Severe Postoperative Pain Relief Compared to Morphine: a Randomized Parallel-group, Double-blind Clinical Trial [NCT02145975]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Effectiveness and Tolerance of Inhaled Fentanyl Aerosol (25µg/Dose) in Chinese Patients With BTcP [NCT05531422]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-20Not yet recruiting
Pain, Opioids and Pro-Inflammatory Immune Responses [NCT01210066]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Unable to recruit prescription opioid abusers; ultimately no potential POA recruit passed the pre-screening process)
Effects of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Surgery on Lower Urinary Tract Function: A Randomized, Controlled Study [NCT01220362]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Population Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation [NCT01144312]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of BEMA™ Fentanyl in the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Subjects [NCT00293033]Phase 3152 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
The Role of Epidural Opioids in Pain Management After Abdominal Surgery in Adult Patients - a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04251962]Phase 4135 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-01Completed
The Efficacy Of Nalbuphine Versus Fentanyl As Additives To Bupivacaine In Spinal Anaesthesia For Internal FixationI Of Tibia [NCT03535792]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-04Completed
A Randomised Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Remifentanil vs Fentanyl During Cardiac Surgery on the Incidence of Chronic Thoracic Pain [NCT02031016]Phase 4126 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
[NCT02226328]Phase 4128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-11-30Recruiting
The Effect of IV PCA With Ketorolac or Fentanyl Combined With Caudal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Small Children Undergoing Intravesical Ureteroneocystostomy [NCT01081535]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Comparison of Analgesia With Fentanyl and Morphine on Platelet Inhibition After Pre-hospital Ticagrelor Administration in Patients With ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [NCT02531165]38 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Evaluation of the Postoperative Agitation Prevention and Analgesic Efficacy of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine Infusion in a Pediatric Patient Group to Undergo Dental Treatment [NCT06097169]80 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2023-10-10Enrolling by invitation
Conversion From Fast Acting Oral Opioids to Abstral® (SL Fentanyl) in Opioid Tolerant Cancer Patients With Breakthrough Pain [NCT01315886]Phase 48 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-21Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment difficulties)
Opioid Based Analgesia vs Non-opioid Analgesia for Oocyte Retrieval Procedure - a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT04933058]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-05Completed
Interventional Bronchoscopy Under Noninvasive Ventilation for Central Airway Stenosis [NCT02289586]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-07-31Recruiting
Opioid Free Anesthesia in Bariatric Surgery: A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT03507634]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-11Completed
Bilateral Continous Thoracic Paravertebral Block Versus IV Fentanyl Infusion For Perioperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Through Median Sternotomy [NCT03903367]Phase 1/Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-31Recruiting
Effect of Muscle Reflex Inhibition on Cardiorespiratory Responses to Exercise in Hypoxia [NCT05619887]14 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-30Not yet recruiting
A Long-Term Study of JNS020QD in Patients With Chronic Pain [NCT00788372]Phase 3142 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Incidence of Urethrocutaneous Fistula Following Distal Hypospadias Repair With and Without Caudal Epidural Block - A Pilot Study [NCT03812731]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-22Completed
Is Elective Caesarean Sections for Predicting Post-spinal Hypotension Role of Overactive Bladder? [NCT05624671]143 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Completed
Ultrasonography for Fluid Assessment in Parturients With Preeclampsia Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia [NCT04370847]100 participants (Actual)Observational2020-06-01Completed
Comparison of Preoperative Fentanyl Test and A Short OSAS Screening Scale for Identifying Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome [NCT03705780]104 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-21Completed
Midazolam Used Alone or Sequential Use of Midazolam and Propofol/Dexmedetomidine for Long-Term Sedation in Critically Ill, Mechanically Ventilated Patients: a Prospective, Randomized Study [NCT02528513]Phase 4240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-12-31Enrolling by invitation
Cerebral Oxygenation and Metabolism in Patients Undergoing Clipping of Cerebral Aneurysm: A Comparative Study Between Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Sevoflurane-based Inhalational Anesthesia [NCT03778723]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-18Completed
Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy and Opiate Sparing Effects of Low-Dose, Slow Infusion Ketamine as a Battlefield Analgesic for Acute Pain in Burn Wounds. [NCT03305055]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-16Terminated(stopped due to Funding withdrawn - slow enrollment)
A Pilot Study for a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of Techniques for Perioperative Analgesia for Live Liver Donors [NCT03393988]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-07Active, not recruiting
PECS Block vs. Multimodal Analgesia for Prevention of Persistent Postoperative Pain in Breast Surgery [NCT03084536]Phase 2134 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-07Completed
Precision Medicine in Anesthesia: Genetic Component in Opioid-induced Respiratory Depression [NCT03441282]26 participants (Actual)Observational2018-10-30Active, not recruiting
Administration of Rectal Acetaminophen During Oocyte Retrievals Reduces Post-Operative Opioid Utilization in Fertility Patients [NCT03732469]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-01Terminated(stopped due to Significant change in our clinic structure prevented continued recruitment of patients to the study)
The Effects of Esketamine Sedation Compared With Fentanyl Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04597320]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-01Completed
Development of an Algorithm That Predicts Hypoventilation Due to an Opioid Overdose [NCT03845699]20 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-05-15Recruiting
Comparison of Postoperative Side Effects and Analgesic Quality According to the Combination of Fentanyl and Ketorolac Versus Fentanyl After Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery [NCT05489796]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-06-30Completed
Postoperative Delirium After Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Regional Anesthesia: a Comparison Between Intraoperative Sedation With Fentanyl, Fentanyl-dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl-propofol [NCT03120442]600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-06-14Enrolling by invitation
Comparative Study of Mid-thoracic Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Open Nephrectomy in Patients With Obstructive/Restrictive Lung Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03324490]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-01Completed
Efficacy of Oxycodone-propofol Combination Compared With a Fentanyl-propofol Combination on Conscious Sedation Effect and Early Cognitive Function During Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography:a Prospective,Randomized, Single- Blinded [NCT03755609]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-06-01Recruiting
Standardised Drug Provocation Testing in Perioperative Hypersensitivity [NCT06065137]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
Optimizing Postoperative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery by Supplementing Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block With Ketamine or Transdermal Fentanyl Patch [NCT06007378]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-05Recruiting
Effects on Recovery of Children Undergoing Elective Surgery: Comparison of Intravenous Formulation of Fentanyl Citrate and Midazolam Administered Orally for Premedication [NCT05500599]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Active, not recruiting
Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intrathecal Morphine [NCT05218733]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-02-15Completed
Does Single Dose Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Sedation Reduce Post-operative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized Control Study [NCT02466022]Phase 354 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
A Verification Study of JNS020QD in Patients With Post-herpetic Neuralgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) or Postoperative Pain Syndrome [NCT01008553]Phase 3258 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
The Effect of Neuraxial Analgesia on Maternal Breastfeeding [NCT01074190]345 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Evaluation of Analgesic Efficacy of Transmucosal Fentanyl for Breakthrough Pain Caused by Interventional Gastrostomy [NCT02869321]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Clinical Outcome Study in Postoperative Pain Management to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of IONSYS (Fentanyl ITS Iontophoretic Transdermal System) in Daily Clinical Practice and to Assess Its Convenience (IPAC) [NCT00779038]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Stopped prematurely in 2008 due to IONSYS withdrawal off the market globally)
A Comparison of Oral Controlled-release Morphine With Transdermal Fentanyl in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients With Moderate or Severe Oral Mucositis Pain Induced by Chemoradiotherapy [NCT04292990]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1, Open-label, Randomized, Single Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of Fentanyl Sublingual Spray and Fentanyl Citrate Intravenous (IV) in Opioid Naive Subjects [NCT02576353]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral Blocks as an Adjunct to General Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammoplasty: A Historical Cohort Study [NCT02671851]64 participants (Actual)Observational2014-01-31Completed
Evaluation of Fentalogs and Their Metabolites in Hair of Patients in a Monitored Clinical Context by Means of Hair Analysis [NCT05740657]225 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2022-12-06Recruiting
Opioid-Free Versus Transitional Anesthetic With Opioids From Tonsillectomy [NCT04528173]Phase 4550 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-22Recruiting
Comparison Of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl In Attenuation Of Hemodynamic Response To Direct Laryngoscopy And Intubation In Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. [NCT04089592]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-15Completed
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Combined Intravenous Propofol and Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Propofol Alone for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound-guided (TRUS) Prostate Biopsy [NCT02733705]Phase 4124 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-01Completed
Does the Reduction of Local Anesthetic Dose Provide Surgical Anesthesia While Avoiding Maternal Hypotension in Obese Pregnant for C/S by Single Shot Spinal Anesthesia? [NCT02563795]100 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2015-05-31Completed
An Open-label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety/Tolerability and Clinical Utility of Low-dose TTS-Fentanyl D-TRANS in Taiwan Patients With Cancer Pain [NCT00771199]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Fentanyl OR Esketamine for Traumatic PAIN (FORE-PAIN) Trial [NCT06051227]Phase 3608 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
The Prospective Randomized Comparison of the Onset Time of Rocuronium in Patients Undergoing Emergency and Elective Surgery [NCT02634255]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-12-31Not yet recruiting
Dexmedetomidine Cycling and Sleep in the Pediatric ICU [NCT05003102]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-02-20Withdrawn(stopped due to No enrollment, IRB closed)
Phase lb, Five Period Crossover, Open-Label Study Evaluating a Single Dose Administration of 3mL or 5mL of Inhaled AeroLEF (Liposome-Encapsulated Fentanyl 500 Mcg/mL), Delivered by up to Four Aerosol Delivery Devices in Healthy Subjects [NCT00794209]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-31Completed
Impact of Fentanyl Matrix on Improvement of Pain and Functioning in Spinal Disorder-related Pain: Multicenter, Open Label, Prospective, Observational Study [NCT00797017]1,576 participants (Actual)Observational2008-05-31Completed
Spinal Mepivicaine With Fentanyl for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy Surgery [NCT00803725]34 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Bupivacaine With or Without Fentanyl [NCT00808327]140 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A European Multicenter Open-Label Study of Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Assessment of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Titration and Treatment in Opioid-Tolerant Patients [NCT00842829]Phase 4330 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment stopped at the end of the recruitment timeframe)
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Block and Mid-point Transverse Process Pleura Block in Mastectomy Surgery [NCT05332028]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-26Completed
Randomized Trial Comparing Intermittent Sedation and Daily Interruption of Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients [NCT00824239]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Postoperative Pain Management After Renal Surgery [NCT02840526]58 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Comparative Study Between Systemic Analgesia and Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Arterial Disease and Ischemic Pain in Lower Limbs [NCT02841488]Phase 356 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-09-30Not yet recruiting
The Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Oxycodone Hydrochloride Versus Fentanyl After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Triple-Blind Trial [NCT05602519]Phase 472 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-10Completed
Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Erector Spinalis Plane Block on Postoperative Pain Management in Liver Transplantation Donors [NCT05406388]41 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-24Completed
Randomized, 2-way Crossover, Bioequivalence Study of Fentanyl 25 μg/h Transdermal System and Duragesic 25 μg/h Transdermal System Administrated as 1 x 25 μg/h Single Application in the Healthy Subjects [NCT00864565]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
Is Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Beneficial in Fracture Mandibular Surgeries? A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT06167187]46 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-01Recruiting
Postoperative Pain Control With Fentanyl Patch in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and TRAM or DIEP Flap Reconstruction [NCT01258296]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures Comparing Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block to Systemic Opioids and Its Effect on Delirium Occurrence [NCT02689024]Phase 4239 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Terminated(stopped due to recruitment too slow; intervention was standard care in patients who were not included; acute care pathways changed due to policy regarding hip fracture patients)
Influence of Sepsis, Age and SLCO1A2 Genetic Polymorphisms on Rocuronium Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics in ASA I-III Surgical Patients [NCT02399397]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Moderate Sedation Combined With Acupuncture Anesthesia in Gastroscopy and Colonoscopy on Screening Research [NCT05485064]108 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-01Completed
A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Two-Phase Crossover Study of Nasalfent (Fentanyl Citrate Nasal Spray) in the Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain (BTCP) in Subjects Taking Regular Opioid Therapy [NCT00459277]Phase 373 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Cognitive Function and Addiction in Patients With Chronic Pain Under Opioid Tapering in a Multidisciplinary Pain Treatment [NCT03365817]Phase 375 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-02Completed
Influence of Combined Intrathecal Morphine and Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT03365115]111 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-01Not yet recruiting
Fentanyl Versus Midazolam as an Adjunct to Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery [NCT03592537]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-15Completed
Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04444635]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-14Completed
Onset of Labor Epidural Analgesia With Low Dose Bupivacaine and Different Doses of Fentanyl: a Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial. [NCT02004899]Phase 3105 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Fentanyl Effect on Blood Pressure in Elderly Patients After Induction of General Anesthesia [NCT02489019]Phase 2/Phase 3105 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-02-19Recruiting
Randomized Trial to Compare Propofol to Fentanyl and Midazolam for Colonoscopy. [NCT01488045]289 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression and Catabolism Syndrome (PICS): A New Horizon for Surgical Critical Care: Project 4B: Lower Extremity Strength Training in ICU Patients [NCT02467023]5 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Organ Protective Effect of Histamine H1 Receptor Antagonist In Patients With Severe Burns: A Clinical Study [NCT06126991]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled, Open-label, Non-inferiority, Three Arm Clinical Study to Assess Inhalation of Low-dose Methoxyflurane, Intranasal Fentanyl, and Intravenous Morphine for Acute Pain in the Pre-hospital Setting [NCT05137184]Phase 3338 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-11-12Completed
Effectiveness of Intranasal Versus Intravenous Fentanyl in Preterm and Term Newborns for Pain Prevention [NCT02125201]Phase 421 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Assessment of Subarachnoid Anesthesia With Low Dose of Pethidine and Combination of Ropivacaine With Fentanyl for Urologic Surgical Operations. [NCT03260283]Phase 2/Phase 3104 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-16Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Active Comparator, Dose-Ranging Study to Explore the Efficacy of SUBSYS® in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Pain [NCT02137525]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Study was never initiated)
Incidence of Transient Horner's Syndrome Following Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia for Mastectomy [NCT02130739]450 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2010-09-30Completed
Randomised Controlled Study Comparing Use of Popofol Plus Fentanyl Versus Midazolam Plus Fentanyl as Sedation in Diagnostic Endoscopy in Patients With Advanced Liver Disease. [NCT03063866]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-21Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Combined Sedation With Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine in ICU Patients [NCT02080169]Phase 4600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-02-28Recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block Versus Intravenous Fentanyl for Postoperative Pain Management After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study [NCT04945694]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pre-injection of Lidocaine on Myoclonus Induced by Induction With Etomidate in Elderly Patients During General Anesthesia [NCT02141737]Phase 4272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Recruiting
Fentanyl vs. Lidocaine/Ketamine Infusion for Hip Arthroscopy [NCT02150161]Phase 353 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Terminated(stopped due to DSMB estimated futility of the trial and safety risk)
Comparison of the Effects of Oxycodone Versus Fentanyl on Airway Reflex to Tracheal Extubation and Postoperative Pain During Recovery of Anesthesia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT03204045]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-01Completed
A Comparison of Different Concentration Ropivacaine Combination With Fentanyl for Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery [NCT03195309]Phase 1/Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-20Active, not recruiting
Propofol-Ketamine (Ketofol) Versus Propofol-Fentanyl (Fenofol) as Procedural Sedation for Unilateral Open Carpal Tunnel Release Under Local Anesthesia [NCT04686448]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Recruiting
A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study to Evaluate the Use of Remifentanil as a Sole Agent or in Combination With Midazolam Versus Fentanyl/Midazolam During Sedation for Colonoscopy [NCT03037892]75 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-01Completed
Phase 3 Study Evaluating Fentanyl Transmucosal in the Prevention of Pain Induced by Mobilization During Radiotherapy in Patients With Bone Metastasis [NCT02426697]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Recruiting
Anesthetist Controlled Versus Patient-controlled Sedation: Risks and Benefits, a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04823390]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-14Completed
Sequential Use of Propofol/Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Mechenical Ventialtion Patients in ICU, A Randomized Controlled Study. [NCT02122055]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-06-30Not yet recruiting
The Value of Adding Either Meperdine or Fentanyl to Clonidine-bupivacaine Mixture in Patients With Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery Using Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia [NCT02128451]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Study of Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Diagrams for Sedation in Spinal Anesthesia [NCT02136641]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Comparison of PLAtelet Response to Aspirin Between Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain Receiving Fentanyl or Morphine (PLAAFM) [NCT05367336]Early Phase 1100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-31Recruiting
Ultrasound Guided External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block and Pectointercostal Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05691920]Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Not yet recruiting
An Open Label Study to Confirm the Effectiveness, and Safety of Fentanyl Transdermal Matrix Patch in Japanese Patients With Chronic Intractable Pain Who Has Prior Therapy of Codeine, Morphine Hydrochloride, or Fentanyl Injectable Preparations. [NCT00216684]Phase 3139 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
An Investigation of the Influence of Different Intrathecal Opioids on the Post-operative Pain Experiences of Woman at Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital [NCT02577809]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Use of Dexmedetomidine Infusion for Analgesia and Emergence Agitation for Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy and Adenotonsillectomy [NCT00468052]Phase 3122 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Retrospective Case-controlled Study of the Association Between Request to Discontinue Second Stage Labor Epidural Analgesia and Risk of Instrumental Vaginal Delivery [NCT00443560]2,162 participants (Actual)Observational2006-01-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Who Receive Ticagrelor and Fentanyl [NCT03476369]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-04-18Recruiting
Randomised Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl-TTS Versus Weak Opioids in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Cancer Pain Previously Treated With NSAIDs (Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs). [NCT00576017]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Efficacy of Matrifen® in Patients Older Than 18 Years With Severe, Chronic Pain Including Quality of Life Questionnaire [NCT00699335]5,308 participants (Actual)Observational2008-06-30Completed
Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl for Sedation of Postoperative Mechanically Ventilated Neonates [NCT05324891]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Open-label, Long-term Extension Study for Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain With BEMA™ Fentanyl [NCT00696137]Phase 35 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Improving Labour Induction Analgesia: a Randomized Control Trial of Single Epidural Fentanyl Bolus at Epidural Initiation for Induction of Labour [NCT04011098]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-01Terminated(stopped due to Unable to meet recruitment numbers, lack of participation)
[NCT00959400]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Withdrawn
Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl for Diagnostic and Screening Colonoscopy in Patients With Advanced Liver Disease [NCT00978978]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Not yet recruiting
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block as Postoperative Analgesia in Hip Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04899388]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-01Completed
Intraoperative and Postoperative Analgesia for Laparoscopic Surgery. [NCT00772187]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A 4-week Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Effect of Treatment With Fentanyl Buccal Tablets on Pain Anxiety Symptoms When Used for the Management of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid-Tolerant Patients With Chronic Pain [NCT00387010]Phase 3218 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to The sponsor felt enough information was available for the exploratory assessment of the effect of treatment with FBT on pain anxiety)
A Comparative Study of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy [NCT04318158]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-30Not yet recruiting
Premedication for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration [NCT03735563]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-02-11Recruiting
The Effect of Fentanyl-propofol Mixture on Propofol Injection Pain. [NCT02203175]Phase 2/Phase 3150 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Does Intraoperative Methadone Prevent Postoperative Pain in Bariatric Surgery? [NCT02775474]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
[NCT02768376]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-31Recruiting
Effectiveness of Caudal Epidural Block on Intraoperative Blood Loss During Hypospadias Repair; A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02752308]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
Propofol and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl for Sedation During Diagnostic or Therapeutic Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients [NCT00906139]Phase 4210 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Active, not recruiting
Role of the Single-shot Spinal Analgesia to Control Labour Pain in Appropriately-selected Primiparous Parturients: A Prospective Study [NCT02800694]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Multimodal Peri- and Intraarticular Drug Injections in Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT00562627]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Comparison of the Sedation With Intermittent Bolus Midazolam-Ketamine Versus Intermittent Bolus Propofol-Fentanyl During Endoscopy in Children: Randomized Trial [NCT02732132]Phase 4238 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Comparative Study Between Transdermal Fentanyl and Melatonin Patches on Postoperative Pain Relief After Lumber Laminectomy, a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT02726126]75 participants (Actual)Observational2013-03-31Completed
Respiratory Impact of Short Life Agents Used in Balanced Anesthesia on Patients Suffering or Suspected of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Syndrome [NCT02717780]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
An Open-Label Evaluation of Safety of the IONSYS System [Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System (40ug) for Management of Acute Post-Operative Pain in Pediatric Patients [NCT00666393]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Program Cancelled.)
Open-Label Study To Assess The Effect On Pain Control Of Durogesic (Fentanyl Transdermic Therapeutic System) Treatment In Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Or Osteoarthritis Of The Knee Or Hip. [NCT00524160]Phase 4264 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
Effect of Intrapartum Epidural Fentanyl Upon Breastfeeding in the Immediate Postpartum Period: a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded Study [NCT01497509]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study never started)
Investigational Study of the Effect of Clinical Procedures on Drug Delivery of the Fentanyl Transdermal System (25 µg/hr; Mylan) and Duragesic® (25 µg/hr; Janssen) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00648414]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Terminated(stopped due to due to multiple subjects reporting pain and burning at the phlebotomy sites after 38hr)
Parturient Satisfaction With Epidural Analgesia During Parturient Controlled Pump [NCT06094946]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Dexmedetomidine Infusion on Desflurane Consumption and Hemodynamics During BIS Guided Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT02652312]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Additive Value of Intranasal Fentanyl on Ibuprofen in the Pain Management of Children With Moderate to Severe Headaches [NCT02638506]Phase 462 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Covid restrictions)
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Pain Medications in Children Undergoing Strabismus Surgery [NCT02789969]128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-04-30Recruiting
DEXMEDETOMIDINE OPIOID SPARING EFFECT IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED CHILDREN: Phase 1b, Multicenter, Double Blind Randomized Controlled Dose Escalating Trial of Fentanyl vs. Fentanyl + Dexmedetomidine as the Initial Regimen for Maintenance of Sedation in Mec [NCT03938857]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-18Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment challenging during the pandemic COVID 19)
Effect of Intravenous Magnesium on Post-spinal Fentanyl Induced Pruritus Incidence; A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04160598]144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-02Recruiting
Comparison of Nebulized Fentanyl, Midazolam and Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Premedication in Outpatient Pediatric Dental Surgeries : A Randomized Double Blind Study. [NCT04226885]39 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Completed
Different Modalities of Analgesia in Open Heart Surgeries in Mansoura University: Randomized Prospective Comparative Study [NCT04223219]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-10Active, not recruiting
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Proximal End Femur Fractures, Does it Make a Difference? [NCT02696915]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Allocation-Concealed, Blinded Study Designed to Compare Ketorolac Sublingual and Fentanyl Intranasal in Pain Control for Bilateral Myringotomy and Tubes (BMT) Placement in Children [NCT02653742]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Recruiting
Analgesia for 2nd Trimester Termination of Pregnancy: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous Versus Epidural Patient Controlled Analgesia [NCT01563835]42 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment difficulty)
A Single Center, Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled, Three-way Cross-over Study of the Analgesic Effects of Midazolam Versus Placebo With Fentanyl as an Active Control in Human Volunteers [NCT02629146]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
A Study to Evaluate the Relative Bioavailability of a Fentanyl PAtch Transdermal Delivery System (25 ug/hr) (Sandoz) Compared to Duragesic (Fentanyl Transdermal SYstem 25 ug/hr Patches (Alza) [NCT00857753]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Different Volumes on Postoperative Pain Control Following Breast Surgery: A Randomized, Prospective Study [NCT05232084]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-27Completed
An Open-Label Study of Intraoperative CA-008 Administration in Subjects Undergoing Bunionectomy [NCT03885596]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-25Completed
Evaluation of Adding Magnesium Sulfate to (Fentanyl/Bupivacaine)Bi-mixture as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthesia in Caudal Block Among Pediatrics in Lower Abdominal Urological Surgeries. a Prospective Randomized Comparative Study [NCT06162806]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-14Recruiting
Precision Medicine in Anesthesia: Genetic Component in Opioid-induced Respiratory Depression [NCT04495452]0 participants (Actual)Observational2024-06-10Withdrawn(stopped due to Study initially halted due to the COVID pandemic because the research ventilator was repurposed for life saving efforts. Due to later clinical demands, the study was able to be restarted.)
Pharmacokinetics of Continuous Infusion Fentanyl in Cancer Patients [NCT00899951]2 participants (Actual)Observational2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to poor accrual)
An Intraoperative Infusion of Dexmedetomidine Reduces the Opioid Requirements for Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery [NCT00926705]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Sleep Intervention During Acute Lung Injury [NCT01050699]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Effect of Sublingual Fentanyl on Breathlessness in COPD : A Randomized Cross-over Trial [NCT04004117]Phase 2/Phase 324 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-31Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Usefulness of DurogesicD-TRANS for Pain Treatment in Lung Cancer Patients [NCT01060137]Phase 4268 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Double Blind, Active Controlled Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets Versus Immediate Release Oxycodone for the Management of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid Tolerant Patients With Chronic Pain [NCT00813488]Phase 3213 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Prospective Safety Surveillance Study of IONSYS (Fentanyl HCl) [NCT00665522]218 participants (Actual)Observational2007-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated at the request of the company due to the recall of marketed product in Europe.)
A Phase III Clinical Study of KW-2246 for Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients [NCT00684632]Phase 351 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Comparison Of Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl And Lignocaine In Attenuation Of Hemodynamic Response To Direct Laryngoscopy And Intubation In Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT04138472]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-30Recruiting
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor: A Sequential Allocation Trial to Determine the Optimum Interval Time Between Boluses of a Fixed Volume of 10 ml of Bupivacaine 0.0625% Plus Fentanyl 2 mcg/ml. [NCT02550262]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
Remifentanil vs Fentanyl During Day Case Dental Surgery in Persons With Special Needs: a Comparative Study of Their Effect on Stress Response and Postoperative Pain [NCT02619032]46 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Comparison of Ionsys and Routine Care With Morphine IV (Intravenous) PCA in the Management of Early Post-operative Mobilisation, Ability to Mobilise and in Time to Fitness For Discharge [NCT00766506]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Product class one recall)
Preventive Analgesia in Labour:A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study in Multiparas Undergoing Induction of Labour [NCT00465231]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Single-Dose In Vivo Bioequivalence and Wear Study of Fentanyl Transdermal System (25 µg/h; Mylan) and Fentanyl Transdermal System With Overlay (25 µg/h; Mylan) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00650117]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Chronic Administration of Opioids in Cancer Chronic Pain:an Open Prospective Study on Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacogenetic Factors Influence. [NCT00916890]Phase 4320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-02-28Suspended(stopped due to difficulties in patients enrolment)
Comparison of Patient-controlled Analgesia With Background Opioid Versus Non-opioid Infusion for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Randomized, Non-inferiority Study [NCT05861791]98 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-07Recruiting
Effect of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Balanced Anesthesia on Postoperative Lung Function [NCT00706277]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Comparing the Hemodynamic Effects of Bolus of Ketamine and Fentanyl in Patients With Septic Shock: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05957302]86 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-08-01Completed
A Single-blinded Randomized-controlled Study to Reduce Persistent Post-mastectomy Pain Using Multimodal Opioid-free Anesthesia [NCT05146778]Phase 3230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-16Recruiting
Phase I, 3-Period, Fasting, Bioavailability, Safety Assessment and PK Study Evaluating Single Dose Administration of i.v. Fentanyl (200 µg) and Single and Multiple Doses of 3 mL of Inhaled AeroLEF (Liposome-Encapsulated Fentanyl 500 µg/mL) Administered in [NCT00709254]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
Epidural Anesthesia as an Alternative for Management in Acute Pancreatitis, a Randomised Clinical Trial [NCT02617199]Phase 2/Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Recruiting
Controlled Hypotension During Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Comparison of Propofol and Magnesium Sulfate [NCT04078659]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-30Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound Guidance or Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: a Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT00702416]Phase 450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Partially-blinded, Two-arm, Single-application, 3-way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Adherence of 2 Strengths of Newly Manufactured Samples and Aged Samples of a New Formulation (JNJ-35685-AAA-G016 and JNJ-35685-AAA-G021) of Fentanyl Transd [NCT02608320]Phase 152 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-17Completed
Onset Time of Brachial Plexus Anesthesia With the Axillary or Infraclavicular Approach Under Real-Time Ultrasound Guidance: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00724035]Phase 452 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Stress Response in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Low Dose Fentanyl (LDF), Low Dose Fentanyl Plus Dexmedetomidine (LDF + Dex) and High Dose Fentanyl (HDF). [NCT00848393]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor: A Sequential Allocation Trial to Determine the Optimum Interval Time Between Boluses of a Fixed Volume of 5 of Bupivacaine 0.125% Plus Fentanyl 2 mcg/ml. [NCT02758405]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Changes in Cardiac Output During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia. A Prospective Observational Study Using Transthoracic Echocardiography [NCT05269537]60 participants (Actual)Observational2022-03-12Completed
Recovery of Muscle Function After Deep Neuromuscular Block by Means of Dia-phragm Ultrasonography and Adductor Pollicis Acceleromyography: Comparison of Neostigmine vs. Sugammadex as Reversal Drugs. [NCT02698969]Phase 458 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-11-30Recruiting
Subarachnoidal Anesthesia: Dexmedetomidine vs Fentanyl Plus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Lower Abdomen Surgery [NCT02582372]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Prospective Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Bolus-dose Lusedra (Fospropofol Disodium) 6.5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg Versus a Placebo (With Midazolam Rescue) for Minimal-to-moderate Sedation in Patients Undergoing Procedural Sedation for Re [NCT01195103]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Funding terminated by funding source.)
Intranasal Fentanyl for the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients. A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Cross-over Confirmatory Trial Testing Fentanyl and Placebo in Eight Breakthrough Pain Episodes [NCT00345735]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Post-Operatory Analgesia in Newborn Infants: a Comparative Study of Fentanyl Versus Tramadol [NCT00713726]Phase 3160 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Two Syringe Spinal Anesthesia Technique for Cesarean Section: A Controlled Randomized Study of a Simple Way to Achieve More Satisfactory Block and Less Hypotension [NCT02577432]124 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Effects of Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia on Intrapartum Fever. [NCT00802646]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to study moved to alternate site)
Evaluation of the Nociception Guided by NoL Index and Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl in Pediatric Patients Under General Anesthesia for Non-cardiac Elective Surgery [NCT04786275]25 participants (Actual)Observational2020-12-01Completed
The Comparison of Intrathecal Bupivacaine With Fentanyl and Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl for Labour Analgesia [NCT04221568]Phase 170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-03-01Not yet recruiting
Comparison Between Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Versus Local Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia After Wrist Arthroscopy, a Prospective Randomized Open Label Study [NCT02970097]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of resources)
Effectiveness of Quadratus Lumborum Block After Nephrectomy [NCT03529201]105 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-07Completed
An Open-Label Study Investigating Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of Fentanyl Citrate Nasal Spray in the Treatment of BTCP in Subjects Taking Regular Opioid Therapy [NCT00458510]Phase 3403 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Dose-response Study of Spinally Administered Ropivacaine Combined With a Fix Dose of Fentanyl for Elective Caesarean Section in Tall Parturients Under Combined Spinal-epidural Anaesthesia [NCT03936790]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-02Enrolling by invitation
Reliability of Non-invasive Carbon Dioxide Monitoring During Conscious Sedation for Adult Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Patients [NCT04481308]150 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-10-31Recruiting
Pain Management Following Myringotomy and Tube Placement: Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl [NCT01188551]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Fentanyl, Sufentanil and Butorphanol After Remifentanil Anesthesia in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgeries [NCT00738192]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Phase III Study of JNS020QD in Cancer Pain Patients - Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of JNS020QD Switched From Opioid Analgesics [NCT00641667]Phase 366 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Effect of Body Mass Index on the ED95 of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Elective Cesarean Section [NCT00403663]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Analgesic Effect and Plasma Concentration of Epidural Versus Intravenous Fentanyl [NCT00635986]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Effentora® for Dyspnoea - Fentanyl Buccal Tablet for the Relief of Episodic Breathlessness in Cancer Patients: A Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized, Morphine-controlled, Crossover, Phase II-TRIAL [NCT04635852]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Versus Intravenous Midazolam and Ketamine in Sedation for Painful Outpatient Procedures [NCT04621110]Phase 360 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Not yet recruiting
Ketamine as the Main Analgesic Agent During Analgesia-based Sedation for Elective Colonoscopy- a Randomised, Double-blind, Control Study [NCT05421962]Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-01-01Completed
Epidural Analgesia and Delivery of Second Twin: Prospective Observational Study [NCT04608006]124 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2014-11-03Completed
Double-Blind, Parallel, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled 12-Week Efficacy and Safety Assessment of ZR-02-01 in the Treatment of Chronic, Moderate to Severe Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain [NCT00108771]Phase 2202 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Transurethral Resection of the Bladder: Spinal Versus General Anesthesia [NCT02534623]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Not yet recruiting
Ιntraoperative Administration of Opioids Guided by the Nociception Level Index NOL in Elective Laparoscopic Surgeries Under General Anesthesia: Effect on Opioid Consumption, Post-operative Pain and Patient Recovery [NCT06104059]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-16Recruiting
Comparison of Postoperative Nociception Outcomes Between NOL - Guided and Standard Intraoperative Analgesia Based on Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery With General Anesthesia [NCT03858621]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-15Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Sedatives and Analgesics During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Support [NCT03593408]20 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-02-08Recruiting
[NCT01425658]Phase 1/Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Parturient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) With or Without a Basal Infusion for Early Labor [NCT00871442]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to would not substantially add to existing contributions in the literature)
Comparison of Transdermal Fentanyl PCA and IV Morphine PCA in the Management of Postoperative Pain Control [NCT00996177]Phase 4657 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
The Effect of Opioid Free Anesthesia on the Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries: Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04048200]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Completed
Fentanyl-Propofol-EMLA or L.M.X4™ Technique for Bone Marrow Aspiration in Pediatric Patients - A Phase III Study [NCT00187135]Phase 3168 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-03-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was terminated due to slow accrual.)
[NCT01053871]104 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Epidural Neostigmine Dose Response for the Treatment of Labor Pain [NCT00779467]Phase 1200 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Bioequivalence Between Integrated E-TRANS (Fentanyl) System and Separated (Two-Part) E-TRANS (Fentanyl) System [NCT00990418]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
Postoperative Pain and Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia Related Adverse Effects in Young and Elderly Patients [NCT02849730]2,435 participants (Actual)Observational2016-07-31Completed
Comparative Evaluation of Intrathecal Bupivacaine-fentanyl and Bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine for Elective Low Segment Caesarean Section [NCT04095013]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-01Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Compare the Effect of TIVA Propofol vs Sevoflurane Anaesthetic on Serumserum Biomarkers and on PBMCs in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Resection Surgery [NCT03005860]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding could not be arranged, so the study was prematurely terminated)
Influence of Anesthetic Temperature on Cephalad Sensory Blockade With Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery [NCT00815022]400 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
The Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl in Intensive Care Patients [NCT02587273]Phase 4150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Recruiting
Opioid Free Anaesthesia vs Opioid Based Anesthesia in Cleft Lip, Palate ,Alveolus Surgery. [NCT04081909]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-04Not yet recruiting
General Anesthesia Versus Spinal Anesthesia Combined With Intrathecal Morphine in Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecological Diseases. A Randomized Open Controlled Study. [NCT00527332]Phase 4180 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Spanish , Multicentre, Open-label, Observational Study to Assess Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Subjects Taking PecFent® for the Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain (BTPc) [NCT01698645]150 participants (Anticipated)Observational2012-09-30Recruiting
An Open Label, Cross-over, Randomized Controlled Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing Standard Oral SR-morphine by the Clock Medications With Self-controlled Nasal Fentanyl for Chronic Cancer Pain Requiring Opioids [NCT01906073]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Withdrawn
Combined Use of Etomidate and Propofol in Painless Gastroscopy, a Multiple Center, Double Blinded, Randomized,Controled Study. [NCT01913054]Phase 42,450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Recruiting
Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation vs. Standard Therapy for Colonoscopy in Patients With IBD. A Randomised Controlled Study on Satisfaction and Adherence to Treatment Program. [NCT01934088]Phase 4130 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study Evaluating Inhaled AeroLEF(Liposome-Encapsulated Fentanyl 500mcg/mL)for Post-Operative Pain in Adults After ACL Knee Surgery. [NCT00791804]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Multiple-Dose, Non-Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of EN3267 in the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients [NCT00263575]Phase 3139 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
Propofol-butorphanol Combined Anesthesia During Uterine Curettage on Abortion [NCT00795314]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Influence of Epidural Analgesia in Elective Laparoscopic Colorectal Resections [NCT00512395]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label, Multicenter, Escalating Dose, Study to Determine Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Subjects Ages ≥ 2 Through < 17 Years Old [NCT00652028]Phase 269 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
Comparison of the Time to the First Rescue Analgesic Among Parturients Receiving Intrathecal Additive Fentanyl or Intrathecal Fentanyl With TAP Block or TAP Block Alone for Elective Cesarean Sections Under Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia [NCT05550597]93 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-15Completed
Atomization of Fentanyl: A Randomized Comparison Study of Intranasal Versus Intravenous Fentanyl for Pre-hospital Pain Management [NCT00882960]Phase 4500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-04-30Recruiting
Explorative, Double-blind Study on Dose Effectiveness of DUROGESIC D-Trans 12 Mcg/h and 25mcg/h Compared to Transtec and Placebo in Acute Pain Models in Healthy Volunteers. [NCT00886002]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Traditional Labor Epidural: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Maternal and Fetal Effects [NCT00151346]Phase 4127 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Talc Outpatient Pleurodesis With Indwelling Catheter: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03973957]124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-27Recruiting
Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicentre Trial To Investigate Durogesic™ In Comparison To Placebo In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Pain Induced By Osteoarthritis Of The Hip Or The Knee, Who Are In Need Of And Waiting Fo [NCT00236366]Phase 4418 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Remifentanil and Atropine for Intubation in Neonates; a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00815048]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Role of Dexmedetomidine or Fentanyl as Additives to Epidural Levobupivacaine in Painless Labor: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study [NCT04397406]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-01Completed
A Centre-Randomized, Open-Label, Cross-Over Study to Compare the Pharmaco-Economic Consequences of an Ultiva (Remifentanil Hydrochloride) Based Regimen With Conventional Sedative Based Regimens in ICU Subjects Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Ventilation W [NCT00158873]Phase 4224 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
The Safety of Fentanyl TAIFUN Treatment After Titrated Dose Administration and the Current Breakthrough Pain Treatment for Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients [NCT00822614]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-12-31Recruiting
The Effect and Safety of Different Sedation Strategies for Diagnostic Bronchoscopy [NCT03983889]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-17Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1, Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of Fentanyl Sublingual Spray in Opioid Naive Subjects [NCT02641340]Phase 196 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
A Preliminary Study of Sublingual Fentanyl for the Management of Breakthrough Pain Analgesia in Patients With Advanced Cancer [NCT02514252]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-02Terminated
The Safety and Efficacy of IVPCA in the Management of Adult Postoperative Craniotomy Pain: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT00286221]Phase 2/Phase 3159 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Combination of Nitrous Oxide 70% With Fentanyl Intranasal for Procedural Analgosedation in Children: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Monocentric Study [NCT02533908]Phase 3402 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-21Completed
A Comparison of Single Dose Depodur With Fentanyl Infusion for Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia [NCT00762554]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Uncertain safety of one of the study medications.)
[NCT02531529]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Scoliotic Adolescents Undergoing Posterior Spine Instrumentation . A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03968146]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-18Completed
A Pilot Study Assessing the Effects of Sublingual Sufentanil 30 µg on Postoperative Recovery From Ambulatory Surgery [NCT04561375]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-11Terminated(stopped due to For practical reasons of slow enrollment)
The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Short-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT01062906]80 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
[NCT02202239]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-09-30Not yet recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial of the Use of Intramuscular Fentanyl for the Incision and Drainage of Abscess in the Emergency Department [NCT01881997]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to IRB modifications made study impractical.)
Evaluation in Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl-TTS (Durogesic® D-Trans) for Treatment of Chronic Pain [NCT01902524]Phase 465 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Abciximab (ReoPro) as a Therapeutic Intervention for Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Pain Crisis [NCT01932554]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Insufficient recruitment)
Rapid Evaluation of Lifestyle, Independence, and Elimination of Breakthrough Cancer Pain With Freedom From Oral Discomfort Through the Use of Abstral® (Fentanyl) Sublingual Tablets [NCT01936636]164 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2013-10-31Completed
A Randomized, Single-blind Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Remimazolam in General Anesthesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery, Including Follow-up Sedation in the PACU/ICU [NCT01937767]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
Propofol Versus Propofol-Fentanyl as Sedation For Lumbar Puncture in Children With Acute Leukemia/Lymphoma [NCT00214370]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study to Evaluate the Clinical Characteristics and Opioids Treatments in Patients With Breakthrough Cancer Pain [NCT01946555]150 participants (Actual)Observational2013-09-30Completed
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ORAVESCENT Fentanyl Citrate for the Management of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid-Tolerant Patients With Chronic Neuropathic Pain [NCT00214955]Phase 3120 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
An Open-Label, Long-Term Safety Study to Evaluate the Safety of the ZR-02-01 Matrix Transdermal Fentanyl Patch for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain [NCT00126789]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Based on PK data, product did not meet requirement for further development.)
Efficacy and Safety of Opioid Analgesics as a Preventive Treatment of Procedural Pain Associated With Turning Among Critically Ill Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation. A Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Placebo and Fentanyl [NCT01950000]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Pain After Orthopedic Surgery: Does it Help to Give Fentanyl Before Start of Remifentanil/Propofol Based Anesthesia? [NCT00241332]Phase 3100 participants Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active-Controlled, Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of DEX-IN Following Painful Outpatient Procedures [NCT03348423]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-15Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Bupivacaine or Levobupivacaine on Cerebral Oxygenation During Intrathecal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Who Underwent Hip Fracture Repair [NCT01960543]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Comparison of the Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Regional Anesthesia and Intravenous Fentanyl for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Hullax Valgus Surgery [NCT01960595]Phase 490 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Active, not recruiting
Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) vs Surgical TAPB With Bupivacaine for Acute Pain Control in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05750992]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-10Recruiting
Determination of the Effective Volume of the 0.125% Bupivacaine-fentanyl 5mcg/mL Mixture Used for Epidural Analgesia in Labor [NCT01972269]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
First Evaluation of Morphine Hydrochloride by Nebulisation Compared to Intravenous Route in Healthy Volunteers: Preliminary Study Dose [NCT01975753]Phase 1/Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-13Completed
Multicenter Randomized Open Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Fentanyl Pectin Nasal Spray vs Physician Choice-Usual Care in Reducing Predictable Breakthrough Pain at Swallowing in Head/Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy [NCT01980498]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Withdrawn
Impact of Epidural Morphine on the Incidence and Severity of Shoulder Pain Following Thoracotomy. [NCT01984463]22 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Increased incidence of respiratory depression in the morphine group)
Prothrombotic Factors , Angiogenic Growth Factor and Different Anaesthetic Techniques in Cancer Patients Undergoing Prostatectomy [NCT01998685]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Infusion of Fentanyl for Pain Control in Preterm Newborn on Mechanical Ventilation [NCT00571636]Phase 3128 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Comparison of Analgesic Effect and Prognosis of Butorphanol and Fentanyl in Patients With Mechanical Ventilation: a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Study [NCT04315935]Phase 4355 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-15Recruiting
Can Nasal Fentanyl and Buccal Midazolam Give Better Symptom Control for Dying Patients When Compared With Standard Subcutaneous Medication? Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial and Qualitative Interview Study. [NCT02009306]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-23Completed
[NCT02012244]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Randomized Comparison Study of Single Dose Morphine and Fentanyl Added to Intrathecal Mixture on Orthopedics Patients With Undiagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apnea [NCT02014714]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
[NCT02039453]160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-09-30Recruiting
Value of IPACK Block (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of Knee) With Spinal Anesthesia Versus Fentanyl Based Spinal Anesthesia on Postoperative Analgesia for Knee Arthroscopic Meniscectomy [NCT05833776]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-01-01Completed
Efficacy of TTS Fentanyl in the Management of Pain in Patients With Malignancy - Study III [NCT00269737]Phase 37 participants Interventional1986-05-31Completed
Optimizing Outpatient Anesthesia (OSPREy-Outpatient Surgery Pain Relief Enhancement) [NCT03726268]Phase 41,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-11-29Active, not recruiting
Acute Neurological ICU Sedation Trial (ANIST) [NCT00390871]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine Combination Versus Fentanyl-midazolam for Patient Sedation During Flexible Bronchoscopy: a Prospective, Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT06185127]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Completed
Remifentanil and Propofol Versus Fentanyl and Midazolam for Sedation During Therapeutic Hypothermia. A Randomised, Controlled Trial [NCT00667043]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
The Effect of Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia on the Success of External Cephalic Version for Breech Position [NCT00565383]101 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
Hyperalgesia, Persistent Pain, and Fentanyl Dosing in On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [NCT03450161]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-05-14Completed
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Block for Pre- and Post-Operative Analgesia in Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture [NCT04564326]51 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Versus High Dose Fentanyl in Attenuating Stress Response to Endotracheal Intubation [NCT04544163]160 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-05Completed
The Effect of Perioperative Epidural Opioids on Inflammatory Cytokines and Immune Function [NCT01646775]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Recruiting
A Phase III Clinical Study of KW-2246 for Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients [NCT00683995]Phase 343 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Completed
A Pilot, Phase I, 2-Period, Fasting, Bioavailability, Safety and PK Study Evaluating A Single Dose Intravenous Fentanyl 200 µg) and Single Doses of 2 or 3 mL AeroLEF (Liposome-Encapsulated Fentanyl 500 µg/mL) in Normal Healthy Non Subjects [NCT00708318]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
Opioid Titration With 12.5 ug/h Fentanyl Transdermal Patch vs Orally Morphine for Opioid-naïve Patients With Moderate Cancer Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center, Phase III Trial [NCT04533243]Phase 3209 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-01Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of Adding Low Dose Ketamine or Fentanyl to Propofol-dexmedetomidine as Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Craniotomy [NCT06031883]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-01Recruiting
Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Block Versus iv Sedation Analgesia in Reduction of Shoulder Dislocation, Double Blinded Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT06034873]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-15Recruiting
Comparing Strategies of Pairing Sedation and Weaning Protocols on Outcomes of Mechanical Ventilation: A Pilot Study [NCT02219659]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Cocktail Periarticular Injection for Pain Management in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty- A Prospective, Randomized Trial [NCT02270437]Phase 455 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Procedural Pain Treatment With Transmucosal Sublingual Fentanyl Tablet in Colonoscopy Patients [NCT01604187]Phase 4158 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Principal Investigator [NCT01648595]Phase 2/Phase 370 participants Interventional2006-01-31Terminated
The Effectiveness and Tolerability of Fentanyl Matrix in Chronic Non-cancer Pain; Assessment of Patient's Pain Treatment Goal Achievement: Multicenter, Prospective, Open-label, Observational Study [NCT01688583]410 participants (Actual)Observational2011-12-31Completed
Comparison of Remifentanil-dexmedetomidine and Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl Sedation Protocols for Pregnant Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Fetoscopic Procedures [NCT05654064]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Deferred by IRB.)
A Randomised, Open, Parallel-group, Multi-centre Trial to Investigate Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Fentanyl (FITpatch) Compared to Standard Opioid Treatment in Cancer Pain. [NCT00279344]Phase 3220 participants Interventional2004-09-30Completed
Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl Citrate Following Intravenous (i.v.) and Oral Routes of Administration in Healthy Subjects [NCT00714558]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Low Dose Fentanyl/Midazolam Improves Sevoflurane Induction in Adults [NCT00723164]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Herb-Opioid Interactions [NCT00027014]Phase 454 participants Interventional2001-09-30Completed
Effectiveness of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) With Fentanyl Background Infusion for Total Hip Replacement [NCT05429567]Phase 170 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-01Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Single Application, Two-Period Crossover, Pivotal Bioequivalence Study to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Fentanyl Transdermal System (JNJ-35685-AAA-G021) Compared With DURAGESIC Fentanyl Transdermal Patch in Healthy Subjects [NCT02617758]Phase 156 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
Intraoperative Methadone for Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Tonsillectomy - a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05445856]Phase 4130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-28Recruiting
Effect of Fentanyl Given Approximately Ten Minutes to the End of Surgery on Emergence Delirium in Children Undergoing Adeno-tonsilectomy at Kenyatta National Hospital: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial [NCT02753725]110 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
Effects of Addition of Systemic Tramadol or Adjunct Tramadol to Lidocaine Used for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery [NCT02658721]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block for Unipolar Sternocleidomastoid Release in Patient With Congenital Muscular Torticollis [NCT02651311]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-16Completed
Comparison of Fentanyl-bupivacaine and Clonidine-bupivacaine for Breakthrough Pain in Advanced Labor in Patients With Continuous Epidural Analgesia [NCT00691795]Phase 40 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Study was recently terminated due to poor enrollment - never enrolled.)
A Verification Study of JNS020QD in Patients With Osteoarthritis or Low Back Pain [NCT01008618]Phase 3218 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Paravertebral Block for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly: Randomized Double-blinded Clinical Trial [NCT02537860]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
Effect of Intrathecal Dexamethasone Versus Fentanyl on Post Spinal Shivering in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Prostatectomy [NCT04178512]51 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-31Not yet recruiting
Influence of Intraoperative Opioids (Oxycodone/Fentanyl) Usage on the Post-operative Pain Management of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) [NCT04177342]Phase 4196 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-01Not yet recruiting
Single-Dose In Vivo Bioequivalence and Wear Study of Fentanyl Transdermal System (25 µg/h; Mylan) and Fentanyl Transdermal System With Overlay (25 µg/h; Mylan) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00647686]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Single-Dose In Vivo Bioequivalence and Wear Study of Fentanyl Transdermal System (25 µg/h; Mylan) and Fentanyl Transdermal System With Overlay (25 µg/h; Mylan) in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00647842]Phase 1120 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Safety Evaluation of D-TRANS Fentanyl With Naltrexone HCL in Opioid Tolerant Patients (ALZA C-2002-022) [NCT00650182]Phase 2406 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
Comparison of the Hemodynamic Effects of Opioid-based Versus Lidocaine-based Induction of Anesthesia With Propofol in Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05051007]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-01Recruiting
Does Non-pharmacological Intervention Reduce Consumption of Propofol During Colonoscopy? [NCT00913861]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Terminated(stopped due to affiliation's change of the principal investigator need a new review bord)
Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Plus Fentanyl in Treating Pain Associated With Incision and Drainage of Abscesses in the Pediatric Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02635282]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-31Completed
Effect of Inhaled Nebulized Fentanyl on Exertional Dyspnea and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Moderate-to-severe COPD [NCT00974220]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
The Effect of Low-Dose vs High-Dose Epidural Fentanyl on Gastric Emptying - A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04202887]81 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-30Active, not recruiting
Effects of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block and Rectus Sheath Block on Opioid Consumption in Renal Transplantation Donors [NCT05324215]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-17Recruiting
Unilateral Dual Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Pediatric Renal Transplant: A Randomized Control Study [NCT02858622]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
Intravenous Sedation and Analgesia Using Propofol, Fentanyl and Ketamine (PFK) Versus General Anesthesia in Minor Urological Procedures. [NCT04285528]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-17Completed
Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl With Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery [NCT02861716]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-08-31Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Sevoflurane and Propofol Hypotensive Anesthesia on Blood Antioxidant Levels and HIF 1 Levels [NCT04246567]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-01Suspended(stopped due to Ethics approval is expected from the pharmaceutical institution for the study which has received the local ethics committee approval.)
Triple Drug Response Surface Modeling for Patients Receiving Airway Managements [NCT03813875]100 participants (Actual)Observational2019-06-12Completed
Optimal Pain Management After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery [NCT00538499]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-28Completed
Attenuation of Airway and Cardiovascular Responses to Extubation in Chronic Smokers by Prior Treatment With Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl and Their Combination [NCT04659642]Early Phase 166 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-30Recruiting
Use of Fentanyl Patch in Partial Doses Than the Original [NCT01403363]95 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-03-31Active, not recruiting
Neuronale Mechanismen Der Sensorischen Reizverarbeitung in Der Narkose [NCT00434382]768 participants Interventional2002-10-31Active, not recruiting
Restorative Sleep: Effect of Dexmedetomidine [NCT00333632]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Withdrawn
Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block in Pediatric Open Renal Surgeries: A Randomized Comparative Study. [NCT05386121]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-20Not yet recruiting
The Influence of Two Different Premedication Protocols for Endotracheal Intubation in Neonates on Cerebral Oxygenation [NCT01427985]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
Investigation of the Effects of Opioid Exposure on the Ability of the Diaphragm Muscle to Generate Higher Force Behaviors [NCT05856136]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-19Recruiting
The Impact on Postoperative Pain of Substituting Opioids by Beta Blockers for Peroperative Hemodynamic Control in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy [NCT01544959]84 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam Sedation in Patients Undergoing Convex-probe Endobronchial Ultrasound: a Randomized Double Blind Trial [NCT02713191]Phase 2/Phase 3197 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Placebo for Catheterization During a Voiding Cystourethrogram in Children [NCT00405444]Phase 364 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Oral Conscious Sedation With Intravenous Conscious Sedation for First Trimester Surgical Abortion [NCT00337792]132 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Terminated(stopped due to DSMB review at 50% recruitment, further recruitment unlikely to change result)
Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial Study of General Balanced Anesthesia Based on Opioid and Opioid Sparing Balanced Anesthesia for Cholecystectomy Surgery Via Laparoscopy: Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes [NCT02953210]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Enrolling by invitation
Effect of Slow Injection of Fentanyl on the Incidence of Spinal Anesthesia Induced Itching in Cesarean Section [NCT02951806]215 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Effects of Inhaled Fentanyl Citrate on Perceived Respiratory Discomfort (Dyspnea) During Exercise in the Presence of External Thoracic Restriction [NCT01853449]Early Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Comparison of Intrathecal Levobupivacaine Combined With Sufentanil, Fentanyl, or Placebo for Elective Caesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study [NCT01858090]Phase 393 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
[NCT01863355]225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Recruiting
Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Procedural Sedation for Pediatric Orthopedic Reductions [NCT00596050]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
The Effect of Ketamine - Dexmedetomidine Admixture (Ketodex) on Hemodynamic Stability During Anesthesia Induction in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Two Doses [NCT05948267]Phase 4114 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
Does Optimized General Anesthesia Care Reduce Postoperative Delirium In Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Repair? [NCT02604459]145 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-01Terminated(stopped due to Limited availability of subjects meeting inclusion criteria resulting in early termination (lack of funding) before meeting target enrollment.)
Intrathecal Midazolam is a Comparable Alternative to Fentanyl and Nalbuphine as Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section; a Randomized Controlled Double-blind Trial [NCT04932083]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-20Completed
Comparative Study of Magnesium Sulfate Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine for Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Multiple Traumatic Fracture Ribs [NCT03595397]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Fentanyl With Topical Levobupivacaine With Nasal Packing in Endoscopic Nasal Surgery [NCT04410588]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-20Recruiting
The Effect of Using Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Peribulbar Block to Decrease the Introaoperative Muscle Traction Pain (Proprioception) in Squint and Buckle Surgeries in Adults: RCT [NCT05539911]Early Phase 150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Recruiting
Comparison of Sub-dissociative Dose Intranasal Ketamine to Intranasal Fentanyl for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pain in Pediatric Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study [NCT02388321]Phase 422 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-01Terminated(stopped due to Patients meeting inclusion criteria was low, and PI went to another institution.)
An Assessment of the Ability of Fentanyl Citrate Nasal Spray to Manage Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients Without a Timely Response to Their Short-acting Opioids. [NCT01839552]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Site chose to close due to lack of enrollment)
PRO-DEFENSE: Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis [NCT02203019]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Fentanyl Ultra Low Doses Effects on Human Volunteer's Nociceptive Threshold. Towards a Simple Pharmacological Test Able to Predict Pain Vulnerability, Post Operative Hyperalgesia Development Risk? [NCT00454259]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
An Open Label, Comparative, Randomised, Balanced Crossover Trial Comparing Nasal Fentanyl and Oral Transmucosal Fentanyl (Actiq®) in Breakthrough Pain in Patients With Cancer [NCT00496392]Phase 3115 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
The Effect of Adding Ultra-low Dose of Naloxone to Fentanyl on the Incidence of Pruritis After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Prospective Randomized Double-blind Study ÏÑÇÓÉ [NCT04518618]96 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-09-11Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Remifentanil for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care: Multicenter, Random, Double-blind, Parallel, Positive Control Clinical Trials [NCT05641909]Phase 3138 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-01Recruiting
Effect of Topically Administered Levobupivacaine- Fentanyl Versus Levobupivacaine- Dexamethasone Combination in the Control of Pain After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05145543]Phase 2/Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Recruiting
Nasal Fentanyl for Patient Controlled Treatment of Pain in Cancer An Open Label Prospective Phase I b Study [NCT01248611]Phase 1/Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Postoperative Analgesic and Behavioral Effects of Intranasal Fentanyl, Intravenous Morphine and Intramuscular Morphine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Bilateral Myringotomy and Placement of Ventilating Tubes [NCT01244126]Phase 4171 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Post-Marketing Surveillance of Durogesic for Treatment Pain Caused by Radiotherapy [NCT00523887]Phase 4163 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose Esketamine Combined With Target-controlled Infusion of Propofol for Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Polypectomy [NCT04691076]1,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-01Recruiting
Emergence Delirium and Recovery Profile in Patients Undergoing Cleft Lip and Palate Repair: Comparison of Combination of Morphine and Fentanyl With Fentanyl Alone [NCT03010540]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Intraoperative Retrolaminar Block as Opioid Free Anesthesia and Enhanced Recovery After Posterior Lumber Spine Discectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05312866]72 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-05-01Completed
Assessment of Ultrasonographic Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time and Internal Jugular Vein Collapsibility Index in Prediction of Hypotension During Induction of General Anesthesia [NCT06078228]70 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2023-09-24Enrolling by invitation
Cognitive Impairment Following Sedation for Colonoscopy With Propofol, Midazolam and Fentanyl Combinations [NCT00446420]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Comparison of Perioperative Analgesia Between Intravenous Paracetamol and Fentanyl for Rigid Hysteroscopy [NCT04762147]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
Cardioprotective Effect of Ketamine-dexmeditomidine Versus Fentanyl-midazolam in Open-heart Surgery in Pediatrics: A Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Study [NCT05314569]Phase 181 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-15Recruiting
Preoxygenation With Optiflow™, a High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC), is Superior to Preoxygenation With Facemask in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia [NCT03009877]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to withdrawn prior to IRB approval)
The Effect and Safety of Different Sedation Strategies for Diagnostic Bronchoscopy [NCT03406533]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-01Terminated(stopped due to The sample size should be re-calculated based on the first 28 cases.)
Fast Tracking Impact on Fentanyl Consumption and Parents Satisfaction in Non Complex Cardiac Surgery [NCT04376541]70 participants (Actual)Observational2016-01-01Completed
Efficacy of the Intravenous Formulation of Fentanyl Citrate Administered Orally as Premedication in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Open Cardiac Surgery [NCT04991298]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-01Recruiting
Morphine or Fentanyl for Refractory Dyspnea in COPD [NCT03834363]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-15Recruiting
Chloroprocaine Versus Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia for Cervical Cerclage [NCT02862912]Phase 443 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-08Completed
Evaluation of a Novel Intervention to Prevent Polysubstance Overdoses Involving Illicit Stimulants [NCT05493475]1,750 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-10Recruiting
Peripheral Effects of Opioid Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Axillary Node Dissection [NCT00003000]18 participants (Anticipated)Observational1992-05-31Completed
Transdermal Fentanyl Patch for Postoperative Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT01726530]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
The Assessment of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Under Spinal Anesthesia [NCT03029676]Phase 4200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-01Recruiting
Intranasal Premedication With Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Hypotensive Anesthesia During Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Adults: A Randomized Triple-Blind Trial [NCT05604599]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-11-10Completed
Effects of Different Epidural Initiation Volumes on Postoperative Analgesia in Cesarean Delivery [NCT03156322]81 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-01Completed
Multimodal Narcotic Limited Perioperative Pain Control With Colorectal Surgery as Part of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol: A Randomized Prospective Single- Center Trial. [NCT02958566]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Effect of Remifentanil on Postoperative Cognitive Function in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery [NCT01627873]Phase 4622 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Patient Controlled Analgesia Delivered by Fentanyl HCl Transdermal System Versus Morphine IV Pump for Pain Management After Non-emergent Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery [NCT00266539]Phase 3506 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
Pain Treatment After Total Knee Replacement - Continuous Epidural Versus Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia With Morphine [NCT00270322]Phase 480 participants Interventional2006-01-31Terminated(stopped due to We believe regional anesth better for TKR,90% patients got epidural. Last year we started spinal morphine one shot, and found it very promissing.)
A 15-day Trial to Document the Safety, Clinical Utility and Pharmacokinetics of Duragesic (TTS Fentanyl) in the Treatment of Pediatric Subjects With Continuous Pain Requiring Opioid Therapy [NCT00271414]Phase 353 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-03-31Completed
A Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Durogesic (Fentanyl Transdermal Drug Delivery System) in the Treatment of Pediatric Patients With Chronic Pain Requiring Long-term Opioid Therapy [NCT00271453]Phase 341 participants (Actual)Interventional1996-02-29Completed
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of CHADD™ Applied Over a Transdermal Fentanyl Patch for the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Patients With Moderate to Severe Non-malignant Chronic Pain [NCT00278824]Phase 2109 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty identifying and enrolling eligible patients)
Outcomes of Perioperative Epidural Analgesia in Gynecologic Oncology Patients: A Parallel Prospective Cohort and Randomized Clinical Study [NCT00295945]240 participants (Actual)Observational2005-03-31Completed
Effectiveness of Single Shot Intra-thecal Analgesia in Multiparous Women Scheduled for Normal Vaginal Delivery. [NCT05998551]75 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-01-01Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound Guided Knee Genicular Nerve Block and Anterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT05980546]Phase 4244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-06-07Recruiting
Use of Premedication for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Randomized Control Trial [NCT05065424]Phase 458 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-14Recruiting
Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Pain Management in Pediatric Patients With Developmental Dysplasia Sia of the Hip Joint, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05543109]85 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-29Enrolling by invitation
Randomized, Unblinded, Phase III Trial of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Four-Quadrant Transversus Abdominus Plane Block in Oncologic Open-Incision Liver Surgery [NCT03214510]Phase 396 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-04Recruiting
Multi-center Study Evaluating OraVescent Fentanyl Citrate for the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid Tolerant Cancer Patients [NCT00105287]Phase 3100 participants Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Characterization of Pain Processing Mechanisms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome [NCT00108446]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl on Spinal Anesthesia During Dexmedetomidine [NCT03105115]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-25Completed
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Staccato® Fentanyl for Inhalation in Normal, Healthy Volunteers [NCT00402350]Phase 151 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
The Effect of Different Modalities of General Anesthesia and Regional Cerebral Oxygenation on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery in Prone Position [NCT05148637]105 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-01Completed
The Use of Ketamine for Conscious Sedation in Flexible Bronchoscopy [NCT06181188]Phase 466 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-15Completed
Comparative Study of Oxycodone and Fentanyl Given Intravenously in the Treatment of Early Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT00369811]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Fentanyl on Pain Management in Isolated Traumatic Patients [NCT04414800]Phase 3125 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-01Completed
Evaluation of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block on Positioning Pain for Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Patients [NCT04871061]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-06Completed
A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Dose-Controlled, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine in Intubated and Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Subjects [NCT00875550]Phase 3175 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Incidence of Sedation Related Complications With Propofol Alone Versus Propofol With Benzodiazepines and Opiates in a High Risk Group Undergoing Advanced Endoscopic Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01315158]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to - The research team is not able to obtain the necessary support to continue the study.)
Use of Nebulized Fentanyl in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Interstitial Lung Disease and Chronic Dyspnea [NCT03018756]Phase 321 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Is There an Ideal Dose of Intravenous Fentanyl in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Cluster-randomized Comparison of 2 vs. 3 μg/kg/Transport [NCT02914678]7,093 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Completed
Combined Erector Muscle Spinae Plane Block and General Anaesthesia Versus General Anaesthesia Alone - Effect on Perioperative Opioid Consumption in Open Heart Surgery [NCT04338984]Phase 486 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-01Completed
A 12-Week Open-Label Study With 3 Within-Patient Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Periods to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of OraVescent Fentanyl Citrate Treatment for the Management of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid-Tolerant Patients With Noncancer-Relate [NCT00343733]Phase 3120 participants Interventional2006-08-31Completed
[NCT00478101]Phase 22,006 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Fentanyl Use for Sedation in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (FUSE): a Phase 4, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of Fentanyl Added to Midazolam Compared to Midazolam Alone for Sedation in Routine Upper Endoscopy [NCT01514695]Phase 4139 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Impact of Somatosensory Feedback on Peripheral Muscle Fatigue and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With COPD [NCT01522729]8 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl on Time to Extubation in Patients With Morbid Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randamized Controlled Trial [NCT06052111]64 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-05-15Completed
Effect of Epidural Analgesia During Labor on Force of Maternal Push [NCT04888858]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-02Withdrawn(stopped due to The PI, Dr. Younger, left Henry Ford Health.)
[NCT01527890]2,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2012-02-29Recruiting
The Effect of Combined General/Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia on Diaphragmatic Function After Robot-assisted Prostatectomy [NCT01547416]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Multi-center, Open Label, Long-term Study of OraVescent Fentanyl Citrate for the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid Tolerant Cancer Patients [NCT00105937]Phase 3300 participants Interventional2004-04-30Completed
[NCT00115102]Phase 420 participants Interventional2004-03-31Completed
General Anesthesia, Versus Axillary Block for Ambulatory Hand Surgery: Randomized Prospective Study [NCT04727515]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-01-01Active, not recruiting
Routine Versus on Demand Administration of Fentanyl in Colonoscopy: A Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01786434]119 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-10Completed
The Effect of Intraoperative Continuous Remifentanil Infusion on Glycemic Response and Variability in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Prospective, Randomized, Open Label Clinical Trial [NCT02349152]Phase 4116 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Completed
Phase II Clinical Study of KW-2246 in Patients With Cancer Pain - Maintenance Switch Study in Oral Morphine or Oral Oxycodone-treated Patients [NCT00355628]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Methadone in Ambulatory Surgery [NCT02300077]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Inhalational Anesthesia and Precipitation of Dementia: is There a Link? A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two Different Anesthetic Techniques in Elderly Patients [NCT01903421]500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-03-31Active, not recruiting
A Combination Study With Sub-Dissociative Ketamine and Fentanyl to Treat Moderate to Severe Pain in the Emergency Department [NCT03959852]Phase 46 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-18Terminated(stopped due to Residency completed.)
Intranasal Fentanyl in Treatment of Labour Pain - Efficacy and Safety [NCT02571179]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Femoral Nerve Block in Patient With Total Knee Arthroplasty; Analgesic Effect of Perineural Fentanyl Additive to Local Anesthetics [NCT02331576]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-01-31Recruiting
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ORAVESCENT Fentanyl Citrate for Management of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid-Tolerant Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain [NCT00214942]Phase 30 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Open Label Study to Confirm Effectiveness, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl Transdermal Matrix Patch, in Japanese Patients With Cancer Pain Who Have Had a Minimum Amount of Morphine Therapy, Such as Equal to Less Than 45 mg/Day of Oral Morphine or [NCT00216658]Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
An Open-Label, Long-Term Safety Study to Evaluate the Safety of the ZR-02-01 Matrix Transdermal Fentanyl Patch for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Non-Malignant Chronic Pain [NCT00126763]Phase 3105 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated(stopped due to PK results suggested product did not meet requirement for further development.)
A Phase 2 Open-Label, Parallel Group, Randomized, Dose-Finding Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intercostal SKY0402 in Subjects Undergoing Posterolateral Thoracotomy [NCT00807209]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision unrelated to safety)
[NCT00181246]53 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of a Combination of Fentanyl and Lidocaine for Maxillary Infiltration in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis [NCT01794533]Phase 264 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Preliminary Study of Prophylactic Fentanyl Pectin Nasal Spray (FPNS) for Exercise-Induced Breakthrough Dyspnea [NCT01832402]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-11Completed
Regional vs General Anesthesia in Patients With Hip Fracture Under Treatment With Clopidogrel [NCT03596060]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-20Recruiting
Comparison of Bupivacaine-Fentanyl and Bupivacaine-Alfentanil Used Intrathecally in Laparoscopic Appendectomy Surgery [NCT04196946]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-02Completed
Randomized Controlled Doubleblind Pilot Study Comparing Analgosedation Concepts During Placement of Regional Anaesthesia With Either Fentanyl, Remifentanil, Clonidine, EMLA-Patch or Placebo in Regard of Pain Reduction. [NCT04026074]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-26Completed
Dexmedetomidine for Immediate Perioperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Tonsillectomy. [NCT00654511]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Efficacy of Opioid-free Anesthesia in Reducing Postoperative Respiratory Depression in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy: a Pilot Study [NCT02987985]Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-15Completed
Sublingual Versus Endovenous Fentanyl for Pain Treatment in Trauma Patients in the ER - a Double-blind Randomized Prospective Study [NCT03080324]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-01Completed
Fentanyl Administered Intraorally for Rapid Treatment of Orthopedic Pain in the ED [NCT00685295]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Multimodal Analgesia in Children and Adolescents After the Ravitch Procedure and Thoracotomy - a Prospective Randomized Study [NCT03444636]Phase 494 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-02Completed
Effectiveness and Tolerance of Fentanyl Citrate in Painful Pain Induced During Diagnostic or Therapeutic Examinations in Cancer Patients [NCT03809455]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was cancelled by Sponsor.)
Airway Responses During Desflurane Anesthesia Via a Laryngeal Mask Airway: Effects of Fentanyl Pretreatment [NCT01277861]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Patient Satisfaction and Safety With Propofol Based Sedation With or Without Fentanyl for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy :a Prospective ,Randomized ,and Cohort Study [NCT03803449]Phase 4500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Not yet recruiting
The Effects of Remifentanil and Fentanyl on Emergence Agitation in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery [NCT03807011]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-07Completed
A Comparative Study of Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Open Colorectal Cancer Surgeries [NCT03803267]68 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-01Completed
Quality of Recovery of Opioid Free Anaesthesia Versus Opioids Anaesthesia Within Enhanced Recovery Protocol Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Saudi Arabia, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04285255]103 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-01Completed
An Open-Label Single-Dose Crossover Study Comparing the Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Fentanyl Delivered Intranasally Versus Sublingually Versus Intravenously in Healthy Volunteers [NCT02470390]Phase 413 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
A Prospective, Non-inferiority Randomized Double-blinded Trial Comparing Fentanyl and Midazolam vs Diazepam and Pethidine for Pain Relief During Oocyte Retrieval [NCT02494180]Phase 4170 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Postoperative Epidural Analgesia in Spine Fusion Surgery [NCT01838707]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
A Multicenter Open-label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Etomidate Emulsion for Sedation in Patients Scheduled for Upper GI Endoscopy [NCT01729897]328 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
Effects of Ketamine on Recovery From Bariatric Surgery [NCT01724983]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-06-30Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Double-blinded Trial of the Effects of Bupivacaine Induced Motor Blockade on the Second Stage of Labor [NCT01621230]Phase 4481 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Optimal Dose of Spinal Mepivacaine Combined With Fentanyl For Knee Arthroscopy [NCT01701102]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Nasal Spray to Placebo as an Analgesic, in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Cystoscopic Procedures [NCT01708122]Phase 471 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Pilot Study of a Multi-System Analysis of Opioid Receptor Binding [NCT05528848]Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-20Recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Cross-over Trial of Sublingual Fentanyl Spray (Subsys) and Oral Morphine for Procedural Wound Care in Adult Patients With Burn Injury Pain [NCT02241486]Phase 32 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Terminated(stopped due to No funding source.)
Efficacy and Safety of Remifentanil for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Intensive Care: Multicenter, Random, Double-blind, Parallel, Positive Control Clinical Trials [NCT05003570]Phase 3138 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-06-10Recruiting
Comparative Study Between the Efficacy of The Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Lumbar Intrathecal Fentanyl Injection for Postoperative Analgesia After Modified Radical Mastectomy [NCT05352282]50 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-01Completed
Comparison of Intratechal Low-Dose Levobupivacaine With Levobupivacaine-Fentanyl and Levobupivacaine-Sufentanil Combinations for Cesarean Section [NCT02430090]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Predictors of Postoperative Pain Following Oocyte Retrieval for Assisted Reproduction [NCT03105518]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-01Active, not recruiting
Fentanyl Test Results and Its Association With Morphine Requirements in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome After Adenotonsillectomy [NCT02484222]80 participants (Actual)Observational2015-09-30Completed
Determination of Serum Fentanyl Levels After Using Reference and Generic Transdermal Fentanyl TDSs With and Without Standardized Heat Application in Healthy Human Volunteers [NCT02486016]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-09Completed
Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Fentanyl Infusion in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Aortic Coarcitectomy. a Randomized Controlled Study. [NCT04128540]Phase 328 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-01Completed
Ketamine Efficacy for Acute Severe Bronchospasm in Mechanically Ventilated-critically Ill Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03000413]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Recruiting
A Randomised, Open-label, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ACTIQ (Oral Transmucosal Fentanyl Citrate) Titrated According to 2 Regimens in Patients With Cancer and Breakthrough Pain [NCT00236145]Phase 30 participants Interventional2004-06-30Completed
An Open-Label 12 Month Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of OraVescent Fentanyl Citrate for the Management of Breakthrough Pain in Opioid-Tolerant Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain [NCT00228605]Phase 3500 participants Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Randomized Controlled Trial of Epidural-General Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia for Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Influence on Complications and Overall Two Year Survival [NCT03434678]Phase 3133 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-30Active, not recruiting
Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of Fentanyl ETHYPHARM for Breakthrough Pain in Opioid-treated Patients With Cancer [NCT01842893]Phase 391 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Influence Of Low Dose Intrathecal Naloxone On Bupivacaine - Fentanyl Spinal Anaesthesia For Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery In Elderly Patients [NCT04673812]92 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-10Completed
Matrifen for Therapy of Severe, Chronic Pain. [NCT00556270]3,000 participants (Anticipated)Observational2007-11-30Completed
A 4-week, Open-Label Extension Study of ACTIQ (Oral Transmucosal Fentanyl Citrate [OTFC]) Treatment for Opioid-Tolerant Children and Adolescents With Breakthrough Pain [NCT00236093]Phase 20 participants Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Fentanyl in Patients Suffering From Chronic Cancer Pain in an Ambulatory Setting [NCT00236327]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor discontinued the study following the discovery of a number of incompletely sealed batches that were unusable.)
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Hydromorphone vs Fentanyl in Children Undergoing Tonsillectomy Surgery [NCT04230681]Early Phase 1189 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-02-26Completed
Assessing Functionality Changes Associated With Patients Who Were Taking Short Acting Opioids Chronically and Who Initiated Treatment With Duragesic® (Fentanyl Transdermal System) for the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain. [NCT00237341]Phase 4358 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
The Clinical Use and Safety of TTS (Fentanyl) in the Management of Pain in Patients With Cancer [NCT00269763]Phase 332 participants Interventional1987-10-31Completed
Combined Colloid Preload And Crystalloid Coload Versus Crystalloid Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery [NCT02961842]200 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-20Completed
Dexmedetomidine for Peri-operative Sedation and Analgesia in Children Undergoing Bilateral Myringotomy With Tube Placement (BMT) [NCT00654329]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Evaluation of Effects of Additional Fentanyl to Epidural Bupivacaine for Post-Thoracotomy Pain in Neonates on Perioperative Outcome [NCT00286143]Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
[NCT01608334]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Sedation and Analgesia in Intensive Care: Comparison of Morphine and Fentanyl/Midazolam [NCT01602640]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Patient Controlled Analgesia Delivered by the E-TRANS Fentanyl HCl Transdermal System Versus Morphine IV Pump for Pain Management After Primary Unilateral Total Hip Replacement [NCT00264485]Phase 3799 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Combined Spinal Epidural v. Epidural Labor Analgesia for Postpartum Depression Symptoms (COPE Trial): Pilot Randomized Control Trial [NCT03022526]61 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Epidural Analgesia Versus IV Meperidine for Labor Pain Control. Objective Evaluation of the Pain Intensity Influence on the Autonomic Nervous System. [NCT00296751]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Study to Assess the Safety, Dose Conversion and Titration of DURAGESIC® (Fentanyl Transdermal System) in Pediatric Subjects With Chronic Pain Requiring Opioid Therapy [NCT00271466]Phase 3199 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-02-29Completed
Optimization of Sedation Protocol for Endoscopic Procedures Using Impedance Ventilation Monitor. [NCT06060626]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-16Recruiting
Comparison Study of Analgesic Effects for Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl vs Dexmedetomidine-ketamine in Femur Proximal Fracture Patients [NCT02150759]46 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Prospective Randomized, Double-blinded Clinical Trial on Remifentanyl for Analgesia and Sedation of Ventilated Neonates and Infants [NCT00419601]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
Effects of Prophylactic Subcutaneous Fentanyl on Exercise-Induced Breakthrough Dyspnea in Cancer Patients: A Preliminary Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT01515566]Phase 1/Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
An Open Label, Randomised, Single-centre, Two Sequence, Cross-over Trial to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Single Doses of 200 µg, 400 µg and 2 x 400 µg of Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS) in Healthy Subjects Using a Population PK Approach [NCT01497288]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
[NCT01506622]222 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Early Versus Late Paravertebral Block for Analgesia in Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Resection. [NCT01621698]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Efficacy of Injectable Fentanyl in Sublingual Route Versus Oral Morphine Syrup for Breakthrough Pain in Gynecologic Cancer Patients With Chronic Cancer Pain : A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial [NCT05037539]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-15Completed
Intravenous Terbutaline to Facilitate Epidural Catheter Placement for Parturients With Labor Pain [NCT01651962]Phase 4250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-08-31Recruiting
Perioperative Off-label Application (From Admission up to 72 Hours Postoperatively) of Fentanyl TTS as Part of a Pain Management in Comparison to a Certified Pain Medication Management in Adult Patients With a Hip Fracture. [NCT04026022]Phase 3145 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-30Completed
[NCT01666379]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
The Effect of Application of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) Before or After Spinal Anesthesia on QoR-15 Score in Partial Hip Arthroplasty Surgery [NCT05965544]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-02Recruiting
Comparison of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine on Post-operative Urinary Retention in Knee Joint Arthroscopic Surgeries [NCT05596552]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-15Completed
Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block vs Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Lumbar Spine Surgeries;Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05596227]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-20Not yet recruiting
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Fentanyl Sublingual Spray (Fentanyl SL Spray) for the Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain [NCT00538850]Phase 3130 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A French, Multicentre, Open-label, Observational Study to Assess Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Subjects Taking PecFent® for the Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain (BTPc) [NCT01693328]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2012-09-30Recruiting
Ketamine Versus Fentanyl for Surgical Abortions: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial [NCT04871425]Phase 4110 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-27Completed
Randomized, Double Blind, Cross Over Study Comparing Effectiveness of Traditional Opioids Versus Opioids in Admixture With Bupivacaine Upon Self-administration of Boluses Via a Personal Therapy Manager (PTM) in Intrathecal Pumps [NCT02886286]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
A Prospective Double Blind Randomized Comparison of Methadone, Fentanyl, and Morphine for Post-laparotomy Epidural Analgesia. [NCT01828840]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
[NCT01703351]Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-04Completed
Efficacy, Safety and Quality of Life Outcome of Fentanyl Transdermal Patch (Durogesic-D-Trans) Among Filipino Patients With Osteoarthritis and Chronic Low Back Pain [NCT01795898]Phase 4237 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, 4-Way Crossover Study to Assess the Relative Bioavailability of 4 New Formulations of Fentanyl Transdermal System Compared Against DUROGESIC Fentanyl Transdermal Patch After Single Application in Healthy Subjects [NCT01717157]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Investigating Polypharmacy-related Adverse Events in Critically Ill Children [NCT03293927]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-09Withdrawn(stopped due to No participants enrolled in study.)
Pain, Fentanyl Consumption, and Delirium in Children After Scoliosis Surgery: Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam [NCT01748630]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Comparison of Propofol-fentanyl and Midazolam-fentanyl for Conscious Sedation in Painful Procedures [NCT01749579]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Recruiting
Pharmacokinetic Characterization of the Active, Separated System With PK Controller (Fentanyl Iontophoretic Transdermal System, 40 Mcg Fentanyl Per Activation). [NCT01750060]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
A Randomized Single-blinded Trial of Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia [NCT01750099]202 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
The Comparison of Different Administration Routes of Pediatric Premedication-Single Center,Randomized,Controlled Trial [NCT02313337]Phase 480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-31Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of 100 mcg and 200 mcg of Intranasal Fentanyl Pectin Spray as an Analgesic in Adult Males Undergoing Outpatient Cystoscopic Procedures [NCT01756651]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Completed
Comparison of in Intubation With Nerve Block and Intubation With Sedation in Awake Patients in Terms of Efficacy, Complications and Physician's Satisfaction [NCT01768377]Phase 370 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-11-30Recruiting
Bispectral Index Monitoring of Sedation Depth During Flexible Bronchoscopy: With or Without Fentanyl . [NCT03395093]500 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-21Active, not recruiting
A Single-dose Crossover Study of Fentanyl Sublingual Spray 400 Mcg Versus Actiq® 400 Mcg Versus Fentanyl Citrate Injection (iv) 100 Mcg Under Fasted Conditions [NCT01780233]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Intrathecal Magnesium Associated to Lidocaine Decreases the Incidence of the Transitory Neurologic Syndrome Following Same-day-surgery [NCT01794247]Phase 321 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Terminated(stopped due to low recruitment rate)
A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Two-Phase Crossover Study of Fentanyl Citrate Nasal Spray Compared to Immediate Release Morphine Sulphate in the Treatment of BTCP in Subjects Taking Regular Opioid Therapy [NCT00589823]Phase 3135 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Clinical Predictors and Epigenetic Markers for Liver Fibrosis in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency [NCT01810458]109 participants (Actual)Observational2013-10-31Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Three Methods of Intrathecal Bupivacaine; Bupivacaine-Fentanyl and Bupivacaine-Fentanyl-Magnesium Sulfate on Sensory-Motor Blocks and Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Disk Herniation Surgery [NCT01843296]Phase 4105 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
A Phase II/III, Open-Label, Multicenter, Safety, Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic Study of Dexmedetomidine in Neonates Ages ≥28 Weeks to ≤44 Weeks Gestational Age [NCT01159262]Phase 2/Phase 336 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Analgesia For Positioning Patient With Femur Fracture For Spinal Anaesthesia : Ultrasound-Guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block Versus Intravenous Fentanyl [NCT02983344]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Randomized, Cross-over Study Evaluating the Effect of Sedation on Pain Relief After Diagnostic Injections [NCT01472835]73 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Evaluating the Feasibility of Using Transdermal Patient-controlled Fentanyl After Spinal Fusions [NCT03021083]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Contract not reached with sponsor)
The Platelet Aggregation After tiCagrelor Inhibition and FentanYl Trial [NCT02683707]Phase 4212 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Premature Fatigue in Veterans With Heart Failure: Neuronal Influences [NCT02209610]Early Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-01Completed
A Randomized Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block(UGSB) and General Anesthesia (GA) to IV Narcotics and General Anesthesia for Postoperative Pain Relief in Children With Supracondylar Fractures. [NCT02056288]Phase 478 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-10Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment was suspended due to the duration of the study and poor follow-up response by participants.)
A Laboratory Model for Heroin Abuse Medications [NCT00000273]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional1995-08-31Completed
A Phase I/IIa, Pharmacokinetic, Dose-response and Safety Study of Inhaled Fentanyl Aerosol (25µg/Dose) in Chinese Patients With Breakthrough Cancer Pain [NCT04713189]Phase 1/Phase 296 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-15Not yet recruiting
Supplementary Epidural Analgesia in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) - The SEAVATS Study [NCT02359175]Phase 4161 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Completed
Preemptive Intravenous Paracetamol Plus Tramadol Versus Preemptive Intravenous Fentanyl in Day Case Surgeries [NCT05990686]132 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-01-10Recruiting
The Effect of Intravenous Fentanyl Prior the End of Surgery on Emergence Agitation in Paediatric Patients After General Anesthesia [NCT01440114]144 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
The Effects of Two Induction Means on Emergence After General Anesthesia for Elderly Patients Undergoing Transurethral Endoscopic Operation [NCT02974712]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Postoperative Agitation Prevention and Analgesic Efficacy of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine Infusion in a Pediatric Patient Group to Undergo Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy [NCT05986942]80 participants (Actual)Observational [Patient Registry]2023-10-09Completed
Absolute Bioavailability/ Pharmacokinetic and Residual Drug Analysis of Duragesic ® Transdermal System and Generic Fentanyl Transdermal System in Healthy Adults [NCT02531971]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-14Completed
Remifentanil Plus Ketamine Versus Midazolam Plus Fentanyl for Dynamic Flexible Bronchoscopy: Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial [NCT03613792]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Change in procedure means limited value for study question)
Effectiveness of Clonidine, Dexmedetomidine, and Fentanyl Adjuncts for Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Quadruple Blinded Non-Inferiority Trial (CLASSIER Trial) [NCT05487196]Phase 288 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-28Completed
Emergence Agitation and Pain Scores in Pediatric Patients Following Sevoflurane Anesthesia When Comparing Single-modal Versus Multi-modal Analgesia for Routine Ear-nose-throat (ENT) Surgery, a Multi-center Double-blinded Study [NCT03062488]Early Phase 1143 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-03Completed
A Comparison of Epidural and Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study [NCT03115151]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-08Terminated(stopped due to The surgical team has difficulty to find level 1 and 2 fusions for the study.)
A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Trial Confirming the Efficacy of Intranasal Fentanyl Titrated to 50, 100 or 200 µg With an Open Long-term Safety Follow-up in Cancer Patients With Breakthrough Pain [NCT00362583]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam on Resting Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients: Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03030911]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-01Completed
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Glucose Levels and Insulin Secretion Patterns in Obese Patients With Impaired Glucose Tolerance. [NCT03809182]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-27Completed
Intravenous Metoclopramide in the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial [NCT02314351]Phase 4148 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Magnesium Sulphate Versus Fentanyl: Effects on the Quality of Bier Block: Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT04393610]Phase 2/Phase 375 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-14Recruiting
The Effects of Fentanyl and Alfentanil as an Adjunct to Propofol on Cognitive Functions for Sedation in Colonoscopy [NCT02267681]Phase 4150 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Use of Paravertebral Blocks in Reconstructive Breast Surgery [NCT00542542]Phase 389 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients. [NCT01059929]Phase 441 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated(stopped due to drug and placebo unavailable)
Effects and Mechanism of Pretreatment With Dexmedetomidine to Etomidate Induce Myoclonus During General Anesthesia Induction Period [NCT02518789]Phase 4132 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Not yet recruiting
Evaluating an Intervention to Prevent Overdoses in Rural and Urban Counties [NCT05463341]2,400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-09Recruiting
Randomized Double-blinded Study Designed to Optimize the Dose of Bupivacaine in Combined Spinal Epidurals to Reduce the Incidence of Fetal Bradycardia and Maternal Hypotension [NCT02159807]170 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-24Completed
Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Standard Analgesia in Pain Management of Total Joint Arthroplasty [NCT02197273]211 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
A Comparison Between Phenylephrine and Norepinephrine Boluses in Prevention of Post-spinal Hypotension During Cesarean Delivery [NCT03015857]Phase 2200 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Clinical Effects of Esketamine Induction Intubation Versus Conventional Induction Intubation in ICU Patients: a Single-center Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT05464979]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-01Recruiting
Awakening in Spine Surgery Patients Having Neurophysiologic Monitoring: A Comparison Study Between Clinical Signs and Bispectral Index (BIS) Guided Target Controlled Infusion(TCI) of Propofol [NCT02174913]34 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
Randomized, Double-Blinded, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Intraoperative Use of Labetalol vs. Esmolol for Maintaining Hemodynamic Stability During Laparoscopic Surgery: Effect on Recovery and Postoperative Pain [NCT01114971]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-03Completed
Investigation of the Effect of Epidural Analgesia Combined With General Anesthesia on Burst Suppression Rate in Electroencephalogram Based Anesthesia Management [NCT05688449]Phase 464 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-30Recruiting
Nalbuphine, Fentanyl and no Additive to Local Anaesthetic Mixture for Peribulbar Block During Posterior Segment Surgery in Adult Patients a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT03824665]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-02-05Completed
Fentanyl Administered Intraorally for Rapid Treatment of Orthopedic Pain: The FAIRTOP II Trial [NCT01270659]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl for Pain Control in Newborns on Mechanical Ventilation [NCT04937946]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-01Not yet recruiting
Post Craniotomy Analgesia Safety Monitoring With ET CO2 [NCT01327677]Phase 4137 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial of Fentanyl Nasal Spray (Lazanda) Plus Hydromorphone Demand PCA Versus Placebo Nasal Spray Plus Hydromorphone Demand PCA for Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain in the Emergency Department [NCT01812759]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-10Terminated
Effects of Cannabis Use on Sedation Requirements for Oral Surgery Procedures [NCT05873465]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-22Not yet recruiting
Propofol-Ketamine vs. Propofol-Fentanyl for Sedation During Pediatric Diagnostic Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [NCT03235609]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-16Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Adverse Events of Morphine and Fentanyl in an Aeromedical Setting [NCT00580489]204 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
The Effect of Choice of Intraoperative Opioid on Postoperative Pain [NCT01542645]Phase 4164 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
A Comparison of Opioid-containing Anesthesia Versus Opioid-free Anesthesia Using the Cortínez-Sepúlveda Model on Differential Cytokine Responses in Patients Undergoing Gastric Bypass Surgery [NCT04854252]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-12Completed
Comparison of Modified Programmed Intermittent Bolus (MPIB), Computer-integrated Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (CIPCEA) and Conventional Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) During Labour [NCT02278601]Phase 3839 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-28Active, not recruiting
A Preliminary Study of Prophylactic Fentanyl Sublingual Spray for Exercise-Induced Breakthrough Dyspnea [NCT02597478]Phase 2/Phase 350 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-04Completed
Efficacy of Transdermal Fentanyl Patches in Relief of Acute Postoperative Pain After Mastectomy [NCT03051503]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-02Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Fentanyl in Combination With Midazolam Versus Midazolam Alone for Analgesia and Anxiolysis During Pediatric Facial Laceration Repair [NCT04745260]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-01Not yet recruiting
Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Postoperative Analgesia and Muscle Strength Between Single Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block for Ambulatory ACL Reconstruction. [NCT02584452]59 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-03Completed
Comparison Between Conventional and Model-based Infusion Strategy of Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy [NCT02402621]111 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Comparison of Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity According to Different Anesthetics During Transurethral Procedures [NCT03763305]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-01-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Devices for measuring SKNA are need to be re-constructed, which takes considerable time.)
Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Ketamine Compared to Intranasal Fentanyl for Analgesia in Children With Suspected, Isolated Extremity Fractures in the Pediatric Emergency Department [NCT02521415]Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
An Open Label Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Utility of the Active, Separated System With Enhanced Controller (SSEC) Fentanyl 40 mcg for the Management of Acute Postoperative Pain in Pediatric Patients 12 to Less Than 18 Years of Age [NCT02395653]Phase 371 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-29Completed
Personalizing Preprocedural Sedation for Regional Anesthesia: A Randomized Trial and Qualitative Assessment of Patient-Centered Outcomes and Experience [NCT05579509]Early Phase 1150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-01Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Sub-dissociative Dosing of Ketamine Compared to Intranasal Fentanyl for Treatment of Pain Associated With Acute Extremity Injuries in Children [NCT02778880]Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
The Effect of Opioids on P2Y12 Receptor Inhibition in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Are Pre-treated With Crushed Ticagrelor [NCT03400267]Phase 4200 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-16Completed
Analgesic Effect of Ropivacaine Plus Fentanyl vs Ropivacaine for Continuous 3-in-1 FNB After Total Knee Arthroplasty [NCT02501863]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Long Term Evaluation and Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Pacemaker Patients (AF-pacemaker Tx Study) [NCT03401593]135 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-31Not yet recruiting
Assessment of Sensory and Motor Block After Intrathecal Administration of Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine and Levo-bupivacaine Combined With Small Doses of Fentanyl, Followed by Administration of Normal Saline Epidurally:a Clinical Trial in Parturients Scheduled [NCT01558713]Phase 2/Phase 3120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Recruiting
Adiponectin Polymorphisms, Insulin Resistance, and Pharmacokinetics in Obesity [NCT01593397]Phase 1100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Concealed Allocation Comparison of Respiratory Depression and Coughing During Bronchoscopy With Dexmedetomidine-ketamine as an Adjunct to Fentanyl-midazolam Sedation [NCT01158820]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Comparative Study Between Continuous Epidural Analgesia Versus Ultrasound Guided Continuous Femoral Nerve Block (CFNB) Versus Ultrasound Guided Continuous Adductor Canal Block (ACB) for Post-operative Pain Management After Total Knee Replacement (TKR). [NCT05249478]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-05Recruiting
Comparison of Local Anesthesia and Induced Hypotensive Anesthesia on Quality of External Dacryocystorhinostomy Operation Under General Anesthesia [NCT05241054]64 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-31Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Opioid Based and Opioid Free Anaesthesia in Transsphenoidal Surgery for Haemodynamic Stability and Recovery Characteristics [NCT03120234]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of TTS-Fentanyl in Moderate to Severe Pain in Osteoarthritis Patients [NCT01774929]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
The Time Required to Remain Sitting After Spinal Anesthesia With Fentanyl for 50% of Patients to Not Experience Hypotension. [NCT01896960]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-07-31Recruiting
Ketamine as a Sedation Adjunct for Endoscopic Procedures [NCT03461718]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-05Completed
Adding Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl to Bupivacaine for Epidural Analgesia in Combination With General Anesthesia for Elective Lumbar Disc Operations: Prospective, Randomized Double-blinded Study [NCT03438240]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-12Completed
Differences in Incidence of Common Side Effects Between Young Adults and Elderly Patients While Using Fentanyl-based IV-PCA [NCT02448862]10,575 participants (Actual)Observational2015-05-31Completed
Multimodal Analgesia in Cardiac Surgery (Pilot Study) [NCT02734940]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-11Terminated(stopped due to Unable to find participants who met inclusion/exclusion criteria)
Open Label Feasibility Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Use of Lazanda for Anxiolysis During Radiofrequency Nerve Ablation of Lumbar Facet Joints [NCT02571634]Phase 423 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
Comparison of Effects of Low Dose Neuromuscular Blocker Added to Propofol Fentanyl Combination During Lma Procedures in Cystoscopy Patients [NCT03424356]96 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-04Recruiting
[NCT00004424]120 participants Interventional1996-07-31Completed
Ultrasonography Versus Palpation for Spinal Anesthesia in Obese Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery [NCT03792191]280 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-16Completed
Analgesic Effects of Transversus Thoracic Plane (TTP) Block in Cardiac Surgery - Pilot Study [NCT03128346]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-01Not yet recruiting
Pediatric Pain Optimization After Tonsillectomy: A Randomized Double Blind Methadone Pilot Study [NCT05244226]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-08Completed
Inducibility and Stability of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Structural Heart Disease Undergoing VT Ablation Under General Anesthesia (Pilot Study) [NCT02419547]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Pain Control in the Nuss Procedure: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Cryoanalgesia vs. Thoracic Epidural [NCT02721017]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Clavipectoral Fascia Plane Block and Interscalen Brachial Plexus Block for Analgesia After Clavicle Surgery [NCT04332497]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-10Withdrawn(stopped due to no participants)
A Randomized Trial of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Placebo as an Adjunct to Lidocaine Infiltration in Adults Undergoing Abscess Incision and Drainage in the Emergency [NCT03872700]Phase 349 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-08-01Completed
Influence of Dexmedetomidine and Lidocaine on Opioid Consumption, Cognitive Function and Incidence of Neuropathic Pain in Laparoscopic Intestine Resection [NCT02616523]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Real-time Decision Support for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Prophylaxis [NCT02625181]27,034 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
Comparison of Meperidine and Fentanyl on Pain Scale and Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Patients Receiving Brachytherapy: A Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02684942]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A Comparison Between Ketamine-lidocaine Versus Ketamine-fentanyl for Induction on the Hemodynamic Effects in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction :( A Randomized Controlled Study [NCT05502211]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-11-01Recruiting
A Double-blinded, Randomized Trial Comparing the Safety & Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine, Intranasal Fentanyl & Intranasal Midazolam in the Pediatric Emergency Room [NCT05057689]Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-31Not yet recruiting
Patient Satisfaction With Propofol for Out Patient Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study [NCT02937506]Phase 4600 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Between Hyperbaric Bupivacaine With and Without Fentanyl in Reducing Visceral Pain During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anaesthesia in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital [NCT05491187]Phase 372 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-09-20Completed
Impact of Fentanyl Analgesia on the Accuracy of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Measurements in Patients With Portal Hypertension:a Prospective, Multicenter Study [NCT04724148]4 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-01Recruiting
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl to Prevent Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pins Application in Neurosurgery:Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03077503]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Completed
Phase II, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Lazanda in Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation [NCT03071744]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-01Terminated(stopped due to PI is leaving UCSD)
Efficacy of Subcutaneous Infiltration With Local Anesthetic During Elective Cesarean Delivery for Postoperative Pain Control: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03383588]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-07-19Terminated(stopped due to study was published during initial recruitment that showed no difference)
Comparison of Sedation, Pain, and Care Provider Satisfaction Between the Use of Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam and Fentanyl During Laceration Repair [NCT03528512]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-04Terminated(stopped due to Staffing for study was eliminated)
[NCT00376831]Phase 491 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine [NCT02360982]120 participants (Actual)Observational2012-03-31Completed
Open-label Multi-center Safety Trial of Fentanyl Sublingual Spray (Fentanyl SL Spray) for the Treatment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain [NCT00538863]Phase 3319 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Perioperative Epidural Analgesia for Short-term and Long-term Outcomes of Pancreatic Cancer Surgery- Randomised Trial [NCT01929915]135 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Completed
Effect of Different Sedation and Analgesia Strategies on Patients With Mechanical Ventilation [NCT05024799]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-01-31Not yet recruiting
Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Rectus Sheath Block for Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery [NCT02476799]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Compare the Effects of Remifentanil and Fentanyl on the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation of ICU Patients: a Multi-centre, Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT05014711]Phase 4254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-01Recruiting
The Effect of no Muscle Relaxant Versus Reduced-dose Rocuronium on the Anesthetic Condition With Fentanyl in Children Undergoing Adenotonsillectomy [NCT02467595]Phase 475 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-07-31Enrolling by invitation
A Study Comparing the Supraglottic Airway Devices and Endotracheal Tube During Controlled Ventilation for Laparoscopic Surgery [NCT02462915]40 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-06-30Recruiting
Addition of Dexmedetomidine to Levobupivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair Surgery: Could it Make a Difference? [NCT04971759]Phase 2/Phase 390 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-01Completed
A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Indwelling Pleural Catheters Versus Indwelling Pleural Catheters Plus Doxycycline Pleurodesis for Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusions [NCT02623959]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-27Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual)
Intraoperative Use Of Methadone In The Prevention of Postoperative Pain in Kidney Transplant Receptors [NCT04908345]Phase 332 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-17Recruiting
Diclofenac Premedication, as the Effect of Preemptive Analgesia After Post-thoracotomy Chest and Shoulder Pain, as Well as the Changes of the Postoperative Breathing Function Values, a Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Trial [NCT02445599]Phase 43 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-30Completed
The Comparison Between Epidural and Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia for Laparoscopic Gastrectomy [NCT02444897]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray Versus Tramadol and Fentanyl for Pain Control in Rib Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled and Open-label Study [NCT05500677]Phase 448 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-01Completed
Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia in Labour: A Comparison of Two Intrathecal Regimens of Single Shot Spinal [NCT03117595]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-23Completed
[NCT02326727]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Not yet recruiting
Comparison Between IV Propofol and Propofol/ Fentanyl Anesthesia on Patients Surgical Stress Response Using BIS [NCT03143933]Phase 2/Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-07-31Recruiting
The Effect Of Fentanyl 12 Mcg Transdermal Patch On Postoperative Pain Following Unilateral, Single-Level Laminectomy/Discectomy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study [NCT03199157]Phase 478 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
U.S Guided Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Para Umblical Hernial Repair. (Comparative Study ). [NCT06120088]300 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
Inflammatory Effect Comparison Between Fentanyl and Remifentanil in Mastectomy Under General Anesthesia [NCT04435925]48 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-27Completed
Dexmedetomidine , Fentanyl or Nalbuphine As Additives to Epidural Bupivacaine for Labor Analgesia. A Double Blind Randomized Study. [NCT05746351]69 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Dexmedetomidine in Postoperative Delirium in Hip Surgery [NCT03938831]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-01Enrolling by invitation
[NCT02375191]58 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
The Contribution of Intrathecal Morphine Administration to Postoperative Patient Satisfaction During Cesarean Delivery [NCT06076018]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-20Not yet recruiting
Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion vs. Esmolol Infusion for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02327923]Phase 490 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Labor Analgesia [NCT02277782]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-01Terminated(stopped due to Study drug shortage, COVID related suspension of recruitment)
The Effect of a Mixture of Dexmedetomidine-lidocaine-ketamine in One Syringe Versus Opioids on Recovery Profile and Postoperative Pain After Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery [NCT04858711]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-01Recruiting
A Dose Titrated Clinical Trial With a Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomised, Cross-over Phase to Demonstrate the Efficacy of 400 μg Intranasal Fentanyl (INFS) Dose Strength, and to Evaluate 12 Weeks Safety and Nasal Tolerability of All Dose Strengt [NCT01429051]Phase 346 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Hypnotic Depth Reduces Lymphocyte Proliferation to Natural Killer Cells, B-cells, Memory T-cells, Depresses Intracellular Oxidative Burst and Changes Protein Expression Pattern of Monocytes [NCT02794896]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Intranasal Fentanyl for Initial Treatment of a Vaso-occlusive Crisis: A Randomized, Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial [NCT01482091]Phase 4124 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A Randomized Trial to Compare Fentanyl Nasal Spray With Intravenous Opioids to Treat Severe Pain in Cancer Patients in the Emergency Department Setting [NCT02459964]Phase 484 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-14Completed
Postoperative Knee Strength Following Total Knee Replacement: A Double-Blinded Randomized Comparison Study [NCT01620047]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Oxycodone vs. Fentanyl in the Treatment of Early Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Replacement [NCT03019562]Phase 446 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-12-31Recruiting
A Prospective Non-interventional/Observational Patient Cohort Study on the Efficacy of Intranasal Fentanyl Spray for the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain in Cancer Patients. [NCT00994760]131 participants (Actual)Observational2009-09-30Completed
Fentanyl Versus Morphine in Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarian Section - Study on Perioperative Analgesia, Side Effects and Patient 's Satisfaction [NCT05533229]160 participants (Actual)Observational2022-04-01Completed
A Preliminary Study of Prophylactic Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT) for Exercise Induced Breakthrough Dyspnea [NCT01856114]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-27Completed
Comparative Effectiveness of Multi-modal Pain Management Versus Standard Intra- and Post-operative Analgesia: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Reduce Post-operative Pain and Opioid Use Among Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery [NCT03088306]Early Phase 149 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-01Completed
Sublingual Versus Endovenous Fentanyl for the Prehospital Analgesia in Patients With Limb Trauma on the Slope - a Double-blind Randomized Prospective Study [NCT03080350]Phase 4108 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
Comparison of the Effect of Adding Midazolam Versus Fentanyl to Intrathecal Levobupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section [NCT03824314]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-01Completed
[NCT01892332]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
VIVA: Volatile or IV Anesthesia for Cancer [NCT06017141]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-05-22Recruiting
Multimodal Opioid-free Anesthesia Versus Opioid-based Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valve Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04648540]Early Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-01Completed
Spinal Fentanyl or Epidural Analgesia in the Early First Phase of Induced Labor [NCT04645823]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-26Completed
Phase IV, Open-Label, Safety Study Evaluating the Use of Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Subjects Undergoing Procedure-Type Sedation [NCT01519167]Phase 491 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
Comparison of Ropivacaine With or Without Fentanyl in Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Surgeries [NCT04199013]Phase 474 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-10Recruiting
Evaluation Study of Efficacy and Safety of TTS-Fentanyl in Chronic Non-Malignant Pain [NCT01816243]Phase 439 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
An Observational Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Abstral Oral Disintegrating Tablet (ODT) for the Management of Breakthrough Cancer Pain in Korean Cancer Patients [NCT03895762]143 participants (Actual)Observational2017-07-04Completed
Is it Possible to Replace Fentanyl by Non Narcotic Medication for Induction and Maintenance of Anesthesia in Minor Procedures? [NCT03806374]120 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-02Completed
Evaluation Study of Efficacy and Safety of TTS-Fentanyl in Severe Chronic Low Back Pain [NCT01774903]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Prospective Evaluation of an Anesthesia Protocol to Reduce Post-operative and Post-discharge Nausea and Vomiting in a High Risk Orthognathic Surgery Population [NCT01592708]233 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Completed
Evaluate Safety and Tolerability and Compare Absorption/Distribution Kinetics of a Single 100 Mcg Dose of Fentanyl Sublingual Spray (Fentanyl SL Spray) in Cancer Subjects With or Without Oral Mucositis [NCT00956254]Phase 318 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Ultrasonographic Thyrohyoid Distance Measurement for Prediction of Difficult Intubation and Ultrasonographic Prediction of Pediatric Endotracheal Tube Size [NCT03013036]150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-02-28Recruiting
Comparison of Sequential and Mixture Injection of Opioids and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Subarachnoid Block for Elective Caesarean Section; a Randomised Controlled Study [NCT04403724]Phase 4126 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-11Completed
[NCT01679106]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Study closed because of low enrolment)
Coronary Angiography THerapeutic Virtual Reality: Investigating the Effect of Virtual Reality on Procedural Anxiety, Pain and Vasospasm [NCT03490903]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-01Withdrawn(stopped due to No patients enrolled)
Intranasal Fentanyl for Pain Control During First-Trimester Uterine Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03057041]107 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-23Completed
Per-operative Low-Dose Ketamine For Postoperative Pain Relief In Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Randomised Study [NCT03052673]Phase 476 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-20Completed
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of TTS-Fentanyl in Moderate to Severe Pain From Knee Osteoarthritis [NCT01742897]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Comparison of Effectiveness of Different Airway Management Methods During Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Assisted Percutaneous Tracheostomy [NCT04872881]Phase 452 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-01Not yet recruiting
Global Assessment of Treatment With IONSYS and Its Handling by Patients, Doctors and Nursing Staff in the Management of Acute Moderate to Severe Post-Surgery Pain in Hospitalised Patients [NCT01804673]Phase 4174 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Terminated(stopped due to The study was prematurely discontinued since study medication was no longer available.)
Randomized Trial for Pain Management in Low-grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage [NCT01851720]Phase 2/Phase 31 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Inclusion criteria were too strict and therefore we were not able to recruit more patients.)
A Single Dose of Etomidate During Rapid Sequence Induction in Trauma Patients Causes Significant Adrenocortical Insufficiency: A Prospective Randomized Study [NCT00462644]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Phase II/III, Open-Label, Multicenter, Safety, and Efficacy Study of Dexmedetomidine in Preterm Subjects Ages ≥28 Weeks to <36 Weeks Gestational Age [NCT01508455]Phase 2/Phase 36 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Non-inferiority of Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Oral Morphine Sulfate in the Treatment of Pain in Pediatric Trauma : a Controled Randomized , Single Blind Study [NCT03063359]Phase 322 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-30Terminated(stopped due to The new pain protocols imposed by the HAS make it difficult to include new patients in the study)
The Effect of Intraoperative Labetalol on Time to Discharge and Hemodynamic Stability in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [NCT02997800]Phase 2172 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
A Comparison of Single Dose Preservative Free Morphine With Fentanyl Infusion for Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia [NCT01362998]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of time and help to continue the study)
Opioid-free Anesthesia With a Mixture of Dexmedetomidine-lidocaine-ketamine in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies [NCT05089526]70 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-11Recruiting
Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Fentanyl on the Incidence of Coughing and Recovery After Propofol-Desflurane Anesthesia With an LMA for Airway Management [NCT01368809]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Double Blind Trial of Pediatric Lumbar Puncture Under Sedation/Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) With and Without EMLA Cream [NCT01516684]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-14Completed
Post-operative Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a Combination of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine Morphine, Bupivacaine Fentanyl and Bupivacaine Ketamine: A Comparative Study [NCT03355716]120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-01-31Not yet recruiting
Effect of Intravenous Fentanyl on the Occurrence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting According to Time of Administration Around the End of Tonsillectomy With or Without Adenoidectomy [NCT03343002]140 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-26Completed
Remifentanil Target Controlled Infusion Versus Standard of Care for Conscious Sedation During US-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): a Randomized, Prospective, Control Study [NCT06033729]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-20Completed
Safety of Dexmedetomidine in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury [NCT01007773]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study will not be intiated)
Partial Scalp Block Versus Fentanyl Infusion in Patients Undergoing Posterior Fossa Surgery Under General Anesthesia. A Randomized Control Trial [NCT04955236]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-14Completed
RCT Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of 4 Therapeutic Strategies Based on 4 Different Major Opioids (Fentanyl, Oxycodone, Buprenorphine vs Morphine) in Cancer Patients With Moderate/Severe Pain, at the Moment of Starting 3rd Step of WHO Analgesic Ladder. [NCT01809106]Phase 4518 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Combined Ketamine/Propofol for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation [NCT01126957]107 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Investigator left institution.)
Preliminary Clinical Trial Investigating the Ability of Plant Exosomes to Abrogate Oral Mucositis Induced by Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients [NCT01668849]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-02Completed
The Potential Renal Protective Effect of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Patients During Radical Cystectomy [NCT03265470]100 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-01Completed
Efficacy of Intranasal Fentanyl at Reducing Pain During Abscess Incision and Drainage (I&D) in Children [NCT01549002]Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl Added to Levobupivacaine for Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery [NCT03778671]Phase 1/Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Gabapentin Versus Standard of Care for Prevention and Treatment of Mucositis in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Primary or Adjuvant Chemoradiation [NCT02480114]Phase 379 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Comparison of Analgesic Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Fentanyl for Spinal Anesthesia is Sitting Position in Patients With Proximal Femur Fracture [NCT04418674]52 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-25Recruiting
The Efficacy and the Safety of Dexmedetomidine Sedation on the PICU Patients-A Randomized, Controlled Study. [NCT02296073]Phase 4120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-31Not yet recruiting
Post-Operative Pain Control in Opioid Tolerant Patients: Fentanyl Challenge Protocol Versus Standard of Care [NCT02324933]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to insufficient population, unable to recruit)
Mechanisms of Altered Ventilatory Control in Heart Failure [NCT02421341]28 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Sequential Intrathecal Injection of Fentanyl and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine at Different Rates; Does it Make Difference? [NCT03415087]56 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-01Completed
Rapid Self-Testing to Prevent Fentanyl Overdose Among Young People Who Use Drugs [NCT03373825]93 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-15Completed
Intraperitoneal Instillation and Wound Infiltration Compared With Intrathecal Morphine for Postcesarean Section Analgesia : A Prospective Randomized Controlled Double- Blind Trial [NCT05405049]46 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-01Not yet recruiting
Intravenous Ketamine for Pain Control During First Trimester Surgical Abortion [NCT03751423]Phase 3123 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-06-10Suspended(stopped due to Study on-hold due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. Will resume when possible.)
Comparison of Fentanyl-bupivacaine and Clonidine-bupivacaine for Breakthrough Pain in Advanced Labor in Patients With Continuous Epidural Analgesia [NCT01846221]Phase 4101 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-15Completed
[NCT02510287]128 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
Pilot Study: Ketamine for Acute Pain After Rattlesnake Envenomation [NCT05379179]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-20Enrolling by invitation
Randomized Controlled Trial Examining Effect Of Endotracheal Tube Intubation On Dysphagia In Children Presenting For Upper GI Endoscopy [NCT02460055]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to no subject met enrollment criteria)
The Use of Intranasal Fentanyl for the Treatment of Incident Dyspnea in Congestive Heart Failure: A Prospective Trial [NCT02454751]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Completed
Evaluation Of Efficacy And Safety Of Labour Analgesia By Intrathecal Morphine With Fentanyl Compared To Morphine With Bupivacaine In Mulago Hospital: A Double-blinded Randomized Control Trial [NCT02498171]138 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
Comparison of the Role of Epidural Analgesia Versus Non-epidural Analgesia in Postnatal Depression and Persistent Pain Development: a Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03167905]Phase 2/Phase 3881 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-15Active, not recruiting
Effect of Fentanyl on Expression of Main Opioid Receptor (OPRM1) on Human Granulosa Cells During Ultrasound-guided Transvaginal Oocyte Retrieval. [NCT03248076]30 participants (Anticipated)Observational2017-04-01Recruiting
Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Efficacy of HR020602 Injection in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia [NCT04867343]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-07Active, not recruiting
Determination of ED90 of Intrathecal Lidocaine for Adequate Anesthesia for Elective Cervical Cerclage Surgery [NCT02574832]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Terminated(stopped due to planned surgical procedures decreased)
Impact of Totally Transdermal Sedation in the Weaning From Remifentanil Infusion Among Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation: a Pilot Randomized-controlled Study (The TOES Trial) [NCT04204967]Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-15Recruiting
Effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Opioid Consumption in Renal Transplantation Donors [NCT04863716]52 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-28Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00187135 (6) [back to overview]Movement
NCT00187135 (6) [back to overview]Pain(Yes/No)
NCT00187135 (6) [back to overview]Pain (Yes/No)
NCT00187135 (6) [back to overview]20% or Greater Change in Heart Rate
NCT00187135 (6) [back to overview]20% or Greater Change in Blood Pressure
NCT00187135 (6) [back to overview]20% or Greater Change in Respiratory Rate
NCT00263575 (1) [back to overview]Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of EN3267
NCT00286221 (2) [back to overview]Fentanyl Consumption
NCT00286221 (2) [back to overview]Hourly Pain Scores
NCT00293020 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events.
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]PID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With Complete Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With Complete Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With Complete Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With Complete Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With Complete Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With at Least 50% Decreases in Pain
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With at Least 50% Decreases in Pain
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With Complete Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With at Least 50% Decreases in Pain
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With at Least 50% Decreases in Pain
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With at Least 33% Decreases in Pain
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]PID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]PID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]PID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]PID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]PID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Rescue Medication Usage
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]SPID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]SPID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]SPID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]SPID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]SPID
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]SPID in Neuropathic Pain Subpopulation
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]SPID in Neuropathic Pain Subpopulation
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]SPID in Neuropathic Pain Subpopulation
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]SPID in Neuropathic Pain Subpopulation
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With at Least 33% Decreases in Pain
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Percentage of Pain Free Episodes
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With at Least 33% Decreases in Pain
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Subject Overall Satisfaction With Study Drug
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Summary of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID)
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Percentage of Pain Free Episodes
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Percentage of Pain Free Episodes
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Episodes With at Least 33% Decreases in Pain
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Percentage of Pain Free Episodes
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Percentage of Pain Free Episodes
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Percentage of Pain Free Episodes
NCT00293033 (50) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - Patient's Walking Ability - at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Summary of Participants' Successful Dosing Levels of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets to Control Episodes of Breakthrough Pain (BTP)
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Patient Assessment of Ability to Walk at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Patient Assessment of Ability to Perform at Work at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Patient Assessment of Ability to Participate in Social Events at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Patient Assessment of Ability to Have Sex at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Patient Assessment of Ability to Go to Work at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Patient Assessment of Ability to Enjoy Life at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Medication Preference From the Pain Flare Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - Patient's Relationship With Others - at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - Patient's Enjoyment of Life - at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - Patient's Ability to Work/Perform Activities of Daily Living - at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - General Activities - at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory Subscales at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) Subscale Scores at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) Total Score at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory at Approximately Week 5
NCT00387010 (18) [back to overview]Patient Assessment of Ability to Exercise at Approximately Week 5
NCT00443560 (3) [back to overview]Duration of Labor Analgesia
NCT00443560 (3) [back to overview]Number of Parturients With a Decrease in the Infusion of Epidural Analgesia During Second Stage of Labor
NCT00443560 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Breakthrough Pain in the First Stage of Labor
NCT00462644 (7) [back to overview]Change in Baseline Cortisol
NCT00462644 (7) [back to overview]Cortisol Level 60 Minutes After Cortisol Stimulating Test (CST)
NCT00462644 (7) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay
NCT00462644 (7) [back to overview]Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay
NCT00462644 (7) [back to overview]Number of Deaths
NCT00462644 (7) [back to overview]Postintubation Cortisol (Baseline Cortisol Level)
NCT00462644 (7) [back to overview]Ventilator Days
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID 10) at 10 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (%PID) at 10 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 45 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Percent Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes Posttreatment (%TOTPAR)
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Standard Rescue Medication Usage
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score (PR) at 45 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score (PR) at 30 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score (PR) at 15 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=10 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score (PR) at 10 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Relief (PR) Score at 5 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID15) At 15 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID 60) at 60 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID 5) at 5 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID 45) at 45 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID 30) at 30 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Flare Treatment Satisfaction (PFTS) Questionnaire - Question 21 at the End of the Second Double-blind Treatment Period (Visit 6)
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Flare Treatment Satisfaction (PFTS) Questionnaire - Question 21 at the End of the First Double-blind Treatment Period (Visit 5)
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Flare Treatment Satisfaction (PFTS) Questionnaire - Question 21 at Endpoint (End of Second Double-blind Treatment Period or Last Observation After Start of Treatment Period)
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Medication Performance Assessment 60 Minutes After-treatment
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Medication Performance Assessment 30 Minutes After-treatment
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Breakthrough Pain Preference Questionnaire
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR60) at 60 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=60 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=45 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=30 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=15 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score (PR) at 60 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <= 5 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=60 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=45 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=30 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=15 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=10 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <= 5 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 60 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID60)
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 30 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID30)
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (%PID) at 60 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (%PID) at 30 Minutes
NCT00463047 (41) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (%PID) at 15 Minutes
NCT00468052 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Agitation
NCT00468052 (7) [back to overview]Participants Requiring Morphine Rescue in PACU
NCT00468052 (7) [back to overview]Time to Awaken
NCT00468052 (7) [back to overview]Time to Extubation
NCT00468052 (7) [back to overview]Emergence Agitation and Pain
NCT00468052 (7) [back to overview]Hemodynamic Stability
NCT00468052 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With SpO2 < or Equal to 95%
NCT00527332 (1) [back to overview]Duration of Hospital Stay.
NCT00538850 (4) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 Minutes After Dosing
NCT00538850 (4) [back to overview]Summed Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) at 30 Minutes After Dosing (SPID30)
NCT00538850 (4) [back to overview]Summed Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) at 5, 10, 15, 45, and 60 Minutes After Dosing
NCT00538850 (4) [back to overview]Global Evaluation of the Study Medication at 30 and 60 Minutes After Dosing
NCT00538863 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients That Experienced 1 or More Adverse Events
NCT00562627 (3) [back to overview]Time to Readiness for Discharge
NCT00562627 (3) [back to overview]Pain at Rest (VAS)
NCT00562627 (3) [back to overview]Opioid Use
NCT00580489 (2) [back to overview]Recording of Instance of Narcotic Side Effects.
NCT00580489 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change in Numeric Pain Score (NPS) From First to Last Dose
NCT00641667 (7) [back to overview]Mean Number of Rescue Doses
NCT00641667 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain
NCT00641667 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment Scale
NCT00641667 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale
NCT00641667 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per Day
NCT00641667 (7) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
NCT00641667 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Control
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per Day in Double Blind Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per Day in Titration Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score in Double Blind Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score in Titration Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain in Titration Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Dose Titration Success
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Control in Double Blind Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Change From Dose Titration Phase in the Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Double Blind Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Mean Number of Rescue Doses in Double Blind Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Mean Number of Rescue Doses in Titration Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain in Double Blind Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response Based on Participant's Global Assessment Scale in Double Blind Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response Based on Participant's Global Assessment Scale in Titration Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale in Double Blind Phase
NCT00644787 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale in Titration Phase
NCT00652028 (9) [back to overview]Volume of Steady State Distribution (Vss)
NCT00652028 (9) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)
NCT00652028 (9) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Css)
NCT00652028 (9) [back to overview]Observed Peak Plasma Concentration
NCT00652028 (9) [back to overview]Level of Sedation Based on Average Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) Score
NCT00652028 (9) [back to overview]Clearance (CL)
NCT00652028 (9) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)
NCT00652028 (9) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time Infinity (AUC0-∞)
NCT00652028 (9) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Received Rescue Medication for Sedation (Midazolam) and Analgesics (Fentanyl)
NCT00654329 (2) [back to overview]Incidence of Pain
NCT00654329 (2) [back to overview]Length of Stay in PACU
NCT00654511 (2) [back to overview]Morphine Rescue
NCT00654511 (2) [back to overview]Time to First Morphine Dose
NCT00685295 (3) [back to overview]Time to Analgesia
NCT00685295 (3) [back to overview]Pain Reduction
NCT00685295 (3) [back to overview]Occurrence of Untoward Opioid Side Effects
NCT00696137 (1) [back to overview]Efficacy Was Not Measured in This Study. The Number of Deaths in the Long Term Follow-up Will be Reported.
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]Physician's Final Assessment of the Efficacy of Therapy With Matrifen®
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]Physician's Assessment of the Skin Tolerability of the Fentanyl-patches
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]Physician's Assessment of the Adhesion Properties of the Fentanyl-patches
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]Patient's Assessment of the Acceptance of the Fentanyl-patches
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]Physician's Final Assessment of the Tolerability of Matrifen®
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Anxiety / Depression
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Self Care
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Mobility
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Usual Activities
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Self Care
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Mobility
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Anxiety / Depression
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Visual Analogue Scale
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Pain / Discomfort
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): European Index Score
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Usual Activities
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]EQ-5D (Optional): Pain / Discomfort
NCT00699335 (18) [back to overview]Patient's Assessment of Pain Severity Score
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Facing Technical Failure of the Device
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Require Concomitant Non-opioid Analgesics
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Require Concomitant Antiemetic Medication
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Time to Fit For Discharge (FFD)
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Time to Actual Discharge
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Participant's Evaluation of Mean Ability to Mobilize After Surgery
NCT00766506 (10) [back to overview]Nurse Ease of Care (EOC) Questionnaire Score
NCT00779467 (8) [back to overview]Bromage Score
NCT00779467 (8) [back to overview]Amount of Drug Consumed Per Hour in Each Group(Arm)
NCT00779467 (8) [back to overview]Pruritus
NCT00779467 (8) [back to overview]Shivering
NCT00779467 (8) [back to overview]Sedation
NCT00779467 (8) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction Scores
NCT00779467 (8) [back to overview]Nausea
NCT00779467 (8) [back to overview]Cesarean Delivery
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Number of Rescue Treatments
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Total Score
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Participants Overall Assessment
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Scores
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Questionnaire of Opioid Withdrawal Symptoms
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Physician's Global Assessment Scale
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Quality of Sleep
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Total Painful Time Per Day
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pain Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Dependence Questionnaire (DQ)
NCT00788372 (11) [back to overview]Pain Visual Analogue Scale Score
NCT00807209 (1) [back to overview]Amount of Rescue PCA Fentanyl Administered for Breakthrough Pain During the First 72 Hours.
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 10 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 30 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 45 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 45 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 15 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Percent Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes Posttreatment (%TOTPAR)
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Medication Performance Assessment 60 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Medication Performance Assessment 30 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Breakthrough Pain Preference Questionnaire
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Use of Standard Rescue Medication
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes (TOTPAR60)
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=60 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Endpoint
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=45 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=30 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=15 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=10 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment - <= 5 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=60 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=45 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=30 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=15 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=10 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment - <= 5 Minutes
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 60 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID60)
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 30 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID30)
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Visit 8- 2 Months After Open Label Treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Visit 9- 3 Months After Open Label Treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Endpoint
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Clinician Global Impression of Change at Visit 7- 1 Month After Open Label Treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 10 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 15 Minutes Post-treatment (PID15)
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 30 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 60 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 60 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Relief (PR) Score at 5 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score at 10 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score at 15 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score at 30 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score at 45 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Pain Relief Score at 60 Minutes Post-treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 7- 1 Month After Open Label Treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 8- 2 Months After Open Label Treatment
NCT00813488 (46) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 9- 3 Months After Open Label Treatment
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Work Fast?) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Is This Medication Easy to Take?) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Impression of Change at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Satisfied With BTP Treatment?) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Summarized by Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes Requiring the Use of Rescue Medication During the Titration Period and the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Enjoyment of Life
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: General Activity
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Mood
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Normal Work
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Relations With Other People
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Sleep
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Walking Ability
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire: Global Score
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Meaningful Pain Relief As Assessed by Participants During the Treatment Period For Overall Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reaching an Effective Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reaching An Effective Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant Assessment of Medication Performance During the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Assessment of Ease of Use at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Feel Safe Taking This Medication?) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Find This Medication Comfortable to Take in Public?) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Understand the Instructions?) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This BTP Medication Relieve Your Pain Quickly so You Can Get Back to Sleep?) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00842829 (24) [back to overview]Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Provide Adequate Relief?) at the End of the Treatment Period
NCT00848393 (7) [back to overview]ACTH and Cytokine Levels
NCT00848393 (7) [back to overview]Stanford-Binet Cognitive Ability
NCT00848393 (7) [back to overview]Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales
NCT00848393 (7) [back to overview]Stress Hormone Levels
NCT00848393 (7) [back to overview]ABAS-II
NCT00848393 (7) [back to overview]Comparisons Between Groups for Narcotic and/or Dexmedetomidine Intervention Influence on Time on Ventilator.
NCT00848393 (7) [back to overview]Comparisons Between Groups for Narcotic and/or Dexmedetomidine Intervention Influence on Length of CTICU Stay.
NCT00875550 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects That do Not Require Rescue Midazolam (MDZ) for Sedation Based on Achieving and Maintaining a Target University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) Score of 1 to 3 While Intubated.
NCT00875550 (6) [back to overview]Time to First Dose of Rescue Medication for Sedation and Analgesia
NCT00875550 (6) [back to overview]Time to Successful Extubation
NCT00875550 (6) [back to overview]Total Amount of Rescue Medication Required for Sedation and Analgesia While Intubated
NCT00875550 (6) [back to overview]Absolute Time on Study Drug That the Subject is in a UMSS Range of 1 to 3 While Intubated
NCT00875550 (6) [back to overview]Absolute Time on Study Drug That the Subject is Out of the Target Sedation Range (UMSS <1 or >3) While Intubated
NCT00956254 (3) [back to overview]Cmax of Fentanyl
NCT00956254 (3) [back to overview]Tmax of Fentanyl
NCT00956254 (3) [back to overview]AUC0-last of Fentanyl
NCT00974220 (2) [back to overview]Dyspnea Intensity Measured by the 10-point Borg Scale During Cycle Exercise
NCT00974220 (2) [back to overview]Cycle Exercise Endurance Time
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: How Many Episodes of Pain You Experience on Average?
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: How do You Feel Today?
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Caregiver: Degree of Relief of Breakthrough Pain Achieved by Instany at Study End
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: Quality-of-Life-Impairment by Pain =QLIP - Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only) Conspicuous ≤20
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: Marburg Questionnaire on Habitual Health (MQHH): Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only) Conspicuous <1.5
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: To What Extent Changes Have Occurred Induced by the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain With Instanyl With Respect to ...(at Last Visit)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: Description of Pain at Initial Visit
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: To What Extent Did Your Expectations in Instanyl Have Met With Respect to ... (Last Visit)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: Marburg Questionnaire on Habitual Health (MQHH): Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Physician: Assessment of Breakthrough Pain Therapy (Initial Visit: Previous/Last Visit: Instanyl)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Physician: What is the Current Treatment Needs of Your Patient Regarding ...
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Physician: To What Extent Changes Have Occurred Induced by the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain With Instanyl With Respect to ... (at Last Visit)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Physician: Degree of Maximum Pain Intensity During the Last Days/ Since the Last Examination
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Caregiver: To What Extent the Treatment Needs of Your Patient Has Changed by the Use of Instanyl Regarding ...
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Caregiver: To What Extent Changes Have Occurred Induced by the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain With Instanyl With Respect to ... (at Last Visit)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Caregiver: Assessment of Breakthrough Pain Therapy by Instanyl (Last Visit)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Physician: To What Extent Did Your Expectations in Instanyl Have Met? (Last Visit)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Physician: Degree of Relief of Breakthrough Pain Achieved by Instanyl at Study End
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Dose of Instanyl
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: Assessment of Breakthrough Pain Therapy (Initial Visit: Previous/Last Visit: Instanyl)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: To What Extent Your Present Condition is Affected by Your Pain Attacks?
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: Quality-of-Life-Impairment by Pain =QLIP - Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: Modified Pain Disability Index (mPDI) - Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only)
NCT00994760 (24) [back to overview]Patient: Degree of Relief of Breakthrough Pain Achieved by Instanyl at Study End
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic Efficacy
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration Period
NCT01008553 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) - Double-Blind Period:
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) - Titration Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind Period
NCT01008618 (13) [back to overview]Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic Efficacy
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With ICU Complications
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Number of Patients Completing Activities of Daily Living
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Number of Patients Completing Mobility Milestones
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Number of Patients Requiring Fentanyl
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Number of Patients Requiring Midazolam
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Proportion of Days With Delirium
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Medication Effects
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Days in Hospital
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Days in ICU
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Days on Ventilator
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Drug Efficacy According to Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) Score
NCT01059929 (12) [back to overview]Mortality
NCT01060124 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Pain Treatment
NCT01060124 (5) [back to overview]Difference in Pain Intensity Before and After Administration of (TTS)-Fentanyl D-trans
NCT01060124 (5) [back to overview]Initial and End Point Dose of TTS-Fentanyl D-trans
NCT01060124 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Detailed Reason for Satisfaction With the Pain Treatment
NCT01060124 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Investigator's Overall Evaluation on the Pain Treatment
NCT01074190 (3) [back to overview]Umbilical Vein Plasma Fentanyl Concentration (ng/mL)
NCT01074190 (3) [back to overview]Cumulative Fentanyl Dose (Micrograms)
NCT01074190 (3) [back to overview]Plasma Fentanyl Concentration (ng/mL)
NCT01114971 (6) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain
NCT01114971 (6) [back to overview]Return to Feeling Normal
NCT01114971 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participant With Opioid Consumption
NCT01114971 (6) [back to overview]Low Appetite
NCT01114971 (6) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction Using a Verbal Rating Scale From 0 to 10
NCT01114971 (6) [back to overview]Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Conversion to General Anesthesia
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Desaturation (Cumulative)
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Desaturation (Longest)
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Endoscopist Satisfaction
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Decreased Minute Ventilation
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Total Fentanyl
NCT01158820 (8) [back to overview]Total Midazolam
NCT01159262 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Received Rescue Medication for Analgesia During Dexmedetomidine Infusion
NCT01159262 (9) [back to overview]Total Amount of Rescue Medication Fentanyl Given for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)
NCT01159262 (9) [back to overview]Total Amount of Rescue Medication Midazolam Given for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)
NCT01159262 (9) [back to overview]Total Amount of Rescue Medication Morphine Given for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)
NCT01159262 (9) [back to overview]Weight-adjusted Total Amount (Per kg) of Rescue Medication Fentanyl Given for Analgesia During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)
NCT01159262 (9) [back to overview]Weight-adjusted Total Amount (Per kg) of Rescue Medication Midazolam Given for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)
NCT01159262 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Received Rescue Medication Midazolam for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion
NCT01159262 (9) [back to overview]Time to Successful Extubation in DEX-exposed Subjects
NCT01159262 (9) [back to overview]Weight-adjusted Total Amount (Per kg) of Rescue Medication Morphine Given for Analgesia During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)
NCT01188551 (2) [back to overview]FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale Scores
NCT01188551 (2) [back to overview]Recovery From General Anesthesia
NCT01195103 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Achieving Sedation Within 4 Minutes
NCT01244126 (2) [back to overview]Maximum PAED Score
NCT01244126 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Postoperative Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) Pain Score.
NCT01270659 (3) [back to overview]Median Time to Significant Analgesia (at Least 2 Units Decrease in Pain Level)
NCT01270659 (3) [back to overview]Nausea Level
NCT01270659 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse Events
NCT01277861 (3) [back to overview]Coughing
NCT01277861 (3) [back to overview]Apnea
NCT01277861 (3) [back to overview]Movement
NCT01315158 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Symptoms of Nausea and Vomiting Will be Compared Between the Two Groups
NCT01315158 (7) [back to overview]Predictors of Sedation Related Complications as Measured by Hypopnea/Apnea (Defined as Fewer Than 6 Breaths/Minute Based on Capnography)
NCT01315158 (7) [back to overview]Predictors of Sedation Related Complications as Measured by the Incidences of Hypotension (Defined as Systolic Blood Pressure of Less Than 90mmHg or a Decrease of More Than 25% From Baseline)
NCT01315158 (7) [back to overview]Predictors of Sedation Related Complications as Measured by the Number of Participants Who Experience Hypoxemia (Defined as a Pulse Oximetry <90% for Any Duration)
NCT01315158 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Airway Maneuvers
NCT01315158 (7) [back to overview]Predictors of Sedation Related Complications as Measured by Early Procedure Termination for an Alternative Sedation Related Complication
NCT01315158 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Other Sedation Related Complications
NCT01327677 (4) [back to overview]Hypoxia
NCT01327677 (4) [back to overview]Mean Fentanyl Consumption
NCT01327677 (4) [back to overview]Respiratory Depression
NCT01327677 (4) [back to overview]Respiratory Depression
NCT01333059 (3) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay
NCT01333059 (3) [back to overview]PICU Length of Stay
NCT01333059 (3) [back to overview]Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Days
NCT01362998 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Observed by Their Nurse to Have Urinary Retention
NCT01362998 (8) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT01362998 (8) [back to overview]Postsurgical Pain
NCT01362998 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Responded Yes to Having Pruritis
NCT01362998 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Required Additional Pain Medications
NCT01362998 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Responded Yes to Having Back Pain
NCT01362998 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Observed by Their Nurse to Have Respiratory Depression
NCT01362998 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Responded Yes to Having Nausea or Vomiting
NCT01368809 (3) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain
NCT01368809 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Nausea and Vomiting
NCT01368809 (3) [back to overview]Incidence of Coughing
NCT01429051 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT01429051 (8) [back to overview]Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a ≥ 33% or 50% Reduction in Pain Intensity
NCT01429051 (8) [back to overview]Induction Phase: Pain Intensity Difference at 10 Minutes (PID10) After Treatment
NCT01429051 (8) [back to overview]Incidence of Improvement or Worsening in Nasal Mucosa Sign or Abnormality Score
NCT01429051 (8) [back to overview]Efficacy Phase: General Impression (GI) Score at 60 Minutes After First Dose
NCT01429051 (8) [back to overview]Efficacy Phase: Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID0-60 and SPID0-30) Derived From PI Scores
NCT01429051 (8) [back to overview]Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a ≥ 1, 2 or 3 Point Reduction in Pain Intensity
NCT01429051 (8) [back to overview]Efficacy Phase: Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 5, 30, and 60 Minutes After First Dose of Study Drug
NCT01472835 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT01472835 (5) [back to overview]Procedure-related Pain Score
NCT01472835 (5) [back to overview]Satisfaction
NCT01472835 (5) [back to overview]Oswestry Disability Index
NCT01472835 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Presence of Bradycardia
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score 20 Minutes After Administration of Study Drug
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Hypotension
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score at 30 Minutes
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Hypoxia
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Change in Pain Score at 10 Minutes
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Admission Rate
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Time to Study Drug Administration
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Respiratory Distress
NCT01482091 (10) [back to overview]Presence of Headache
NCT01488045 (3) [back to overview]Physician Perceptions (Absolute Value)
NCT01488045 (3) [back to overview]Patient Pain & Discomfort Rating (Absolute Value)
NCT01488045 (3) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction Scores (Absolute Value)
NCT01508455 (5) [back to overview]Time Spent With a Total N-PASS Score >3 During DEX Infusion
NCT01508455 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Subjects Requiring Rescue Midazolam for Sedation
NCT01508455 (5) [back to overview]Amount of Rescue Medication for Analgesia During DEX Infusion
NCT01508455 (5) [back to overview]Time to Successful Extubation
NCT01508455 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Rescue Medication (Fentanyl or Morphine) Use for Analgesia During DEX Infusion
NCT01515566 (3) [back to overview]Retention Rate
NCT01515566 (3) [back to overview]Effect of Fentanyl on Walk Distance
NCT01515566 (3) [back to overview]Effect of Fentanyl Versus Placebo for Exercise-Induced and Breakthrough Dyspnea
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Traumatic Lumbar Punctures After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Level of Movement (no Movement, Minor Movement, Major Movement, Other) After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Total Dose of Propofol Administered to Each Patient
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, Post-LP Back Pain From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream
NCT01516684 (5) [back to overview]Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, as Well as Post-LP Headache From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Total Amount of Rescue Sedation (Midazolam)
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Total Amount of Rescue Analgesia (Fentanyl)
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Time to First Dose of Rescue Midazolam From Start of Dexmedetomidine Infusion
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Were Adequately Sedated at Least 80% of Time
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Have Undergone Procedures Without Artificial Ventilation or Intervention
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Had Success in Sedation
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Not Receiving Rescue Midazolam
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Converted to Alternative Sedation or Anesthetic Therapy Due to Failure of Treatment of Study Drug and Rescue Medication
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Frequency of Fentanyl Use for Analgesia
NCT01519167 (10) [back to overview]Frequency of Midazolam Required for Sedation
NCT01542645 (7) [back to overview]Marker of Myocardial Injury (Troponin I)
NCT01542645 (7) [back to overview]Chronic Postoperative Pain Scores-Weekly Frequency of Pain
NCT01542645 (7) [back to overview]12 Months-Chronic Pain-weekly Frequency of Pain
NCT01542645 (7) [back to overview]6 Months-Chronic Pain-weekly Frequency of Pain
NCT01542645 (7) [back to overview]3 Months-Chronic Pain-weekly Frequency of Pain
NCT01542645 (7) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain Scores
NCT01542645 (7) [back to overview]Total Opioid Consumption in the Postoperative Period
NCT01549002 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Satisfied With Analgesia Administered
NCT01549002 (3) [back to overview]Score on the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress Revised (OSBD-R)
NCT01549002 (3) [back to overview]Score on the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R)
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Post-operative Vomiting
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Post-operative Nausea
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Post-discharge Nausea
NCT01592708 (5) [back to overview]Post-discharge Vomiting
NCT01620047 (1) [back to overview]Comparison of Postoperative Strength (Extension)
NCT01621230 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Whose Newborns Received an APGAR Score of <=3 at 1 Min
NCT01621230 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Whose Newborns Received an APGAR Score of <=3 at 5 Min
NCT01621230 (3) [back to overview]The Duration of the Second Stage of Labor
NCT01701102 (1) [back to overview]Time From Spinal Administration to Block Regression to the S1 Dermatome in Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
NCT01708122 (2) [back to overview]O2 Saturation Post Drug Administration
NCT01708122 (2) [back to overview]Pre Procedure 0 - 10 Pain Numerical Rating Scale
NCT01742897 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score at Day 30
NCT01774903 (4) [back to overview]Pain Intensity at Day 30
NCT01774903 (4) [back to overview]Pain Intensity at Day 15
NCT01774903 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Participant Global Assessment
NCT01774903 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment
NCT01774929 (3) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Score at Day 15
NCT01774929 (3) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Score at Day 30
NCT01774929 (3) [back to overview]Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score at Day 15 and Day 30
NCT01795898 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score: Participant
NCT01795898 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score: Clinician
NCT01795898 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Score at Day 30
NCT01795898 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Score at Day 30
NCT01795898 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Medication
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Time Spent Out of the Bed Per Day by the Participant
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Number of Hours Per Day With Average Pain Intensity Less Than or Equal to 4
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Physician Questionnaire Responses
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Physician's Evaluation of Participant's Ability to Undergo Physiotherapy or Mobilization
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Participant Questionnaire Responses
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Nursing Staff Questionnaire Responses
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Rating at Hour 24, 48 and 72
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Post-Operative Phase (PPP33) Quality of Life Questionnaire Score
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Global Assessment of Pain at Hour 24
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Global Assessment of Pain at Hour 48 and 72
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Nursing Staff Global Assessment of Pain
NCT01804673 (12) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment of Pain
NCT01809106 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Full-responder
NCT01809106 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Non-Responder (NR) Participants
NCT01809106 (3) [back to overview]The Opioid Escalation Index
NCT01812759 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Total Pain Relief Score (TOTPAR4) at Four Hours After Treatment Initiation.
NCT01816243 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Participant's Global Assessment
NCT01816243 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment
NCT01816243 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Rating at Day 15
NCT01816243 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Rating at Day 30
NCT01832402 (3) [back to overview]Dyspnea Borg Scale
NCT01832402 (3) [back to overview]Dyspnea Numeric Rating Scale
NCT01832402 (3) [back to overview]Walk Distance at 6 Minutes
NCT01845441 (3) [back to overview]Preserved Neurological Examination.
NCT01845441 (3) [back to overview]Numbers of Patient Movements (Events) That Delay or Adversely Affect the Procedure Performance and Safety.
NCT01845441 (3) [back to overview]Maintenance of Optimal Sedation Target in Both Groups.
NCT01846221 (5) [back to overview]Maternal Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT01846221 (5) [back to overview]Neonatal Apgar Score
NCT01846221 (5) [back to overview]Number of Spontaneous Vaginal Deliveries
NCT01846221 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Success Rate at 15 Minutes Post-epidural Bolus Injection
NCT01846221 (5) [back to overview]Maternal Heart Rate
NCT01851720 (1) [back to overview]Acute Pain Following Sub-Arachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) is the Primary Outcome Variable and Will be Assessed Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
NCT01856114 (3) [back to overview]Walk Distance at 6 Minutes
NCT01856114 (3) [back to overview]Dyspnea Borg Scale
NCT01856114 (3) [back to overview]Dyspnea Numeric Rating Scale
NCT02056288 (6) [back to overview]Time of Achieving Discharge Readiness
NCT02056288 (6) [back to overview]Patient and Parent Satisfaction
NCT02056288 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Side Effects
NCT02056288 (6) [back to overview]The Mean Pain Score in the Postoperative Period
NCT02056288 (6) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT02056288 (6) [back to overview]Time of First Analgesia Request
NCT02150759 (2) [back to overview]Quality of Patient Positioning
NCT02150759 (2) [back to overview]Pain Score Using Five Scales
NCT02159807 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change in Visual Analog Scale for Pain
NCT02159807 (3) [back to overview]Maternal Blood Pressure
NCT02159807 (3) [back to overview]Fetal Heart Rate at 1 Hour
NCT02174913 (2) [back to overview]Total Propofol Dosage
NCT02174913 (2) [back to overview]Extubation Time
NCT02197273 (3) [back to overview]Readmission or Emergency Department (ED) Visit Due to Pain Control Within 30 Days
NCT02197273 (3) [back to overview]Length of Stay in Hospital (Days)
NCT02197273 (3) [back to overview]Time to Post-operative Rescue Opioids (Hours)
NCT02203019 (4) [back to overview]Mortality
NCT02203019 (4) [back to overview]Duration of MICU Stay
NCT02203019 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Vasopressor Support
NCT02203019 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Mechanical Ventilation
NCT02209610 (3) [back to overview]Muscle Afferent Affect
NCT02209610 (3) [back to overview]Maximal Voluntary Quadriceps Force [% Change From Baseline]
NCT02209610 (3) [back to overview]Quadriceps Twitch Force and Voluntary Activation (% Change From Baseline)
NCT02241486 (1) [back to overview]Pain Relief
NCT02300077 (4) [back to overview]Pain Relief Within First 30 Postoperative Days
NCT02300077 (4) [back to overview]Intraoperative Opioid Administration
NCT02300077 (4) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption Within First 30 Postoperative Days
NCT02300077 (4) [back to overview]Postoperative Opioid Administration
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Stress Hormone Levels-ACTH, GH, Glucagon (pg/ml)
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Postoperative Blood Glucose
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Mean, Peak and Trough Intraoperative Blood Glucose (mg/dl)
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Inflammatory Mediator Levels, Interleukin-1b, Interleukin 6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) (pg/ml)
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Insulin Requirement
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Glycemic Variability
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Emergence From Anesthesia
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Blood Glucose Values (More Than One ) > 180 mg%
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Development of Chronic Pain
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Total Postoperative Regular Insulin
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Number of Blood Glucose Values > 180 mg%
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Wound Hyperalgesia
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Stress Hormone Levels-Cortisol (µg/dl)
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Society of Thoracic Surgery Patient Outcomes
NCT02349152 (15) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain
NCT02388321 (2) [back to overview]Pain Score at 30 Minutes
NCT02388321 (2) [back to overview]Adverse Events at 30 Minutes
NCT02395653 (4) [back to overview]Assessment Of Participant's Ability To Use The SSEC
NCT02395653 (4) [back to overview]Assessment Of Adherence Of The SSEC System To Skin
NCT02395653 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline To 1 Hour And 24 Hours In Skin Irritation Score After SSEC Removal
NCT02395653 (4) [back to overview]Number Of Participants To Experience Clinically Relevant Respiratory Depression (CRRD)
NCT02419547 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Had Inducible Ventricular Tachycardia Under General Anesthesia.
NCT02430090 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
NCT02448862 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Nausea and Vomiting
NCT02448862 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Rescue Analgesics Requirement
NCT02448862 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Rescue Antiemetics Requirement
NCT02448862 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Dizziness or Headaches
NCT02448862 (5) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain in Numeric Pain Scale
NCT02459964 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Intensity Score
NCT02459964 (2) [back to overview]Non-inferiority of Fentanyl Nasal Spray Versus Intravenous Opioids in the Change in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Intensity Score at One Hour, Starting From the Time of Drug Delivery (Treatment Initiation).
NCT02470390 (8) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Fentanyl in Plasma (4 of 5)
NCT02470390 (8) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Fentanyl in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) (1 of 3)
NCT02470390 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Fentanyl in Plasma (1 of 5)
NCT02470390 (8) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Fentanyl in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) (2 of 3)
NCT02470390 (8) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC 0-tlast) of Fentanyl in Plasma (2 of 5)
NCT02470390 (8) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC 0-inf) of Fentanyl in Plasma (3 of 5)
NCT02470390 (8) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Hour 0 to Hour 6 (AUC 0-6h) of Fentanyl in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) (3 of 3)
NCT02470390 (8) [back to overview]Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Fentanyl in Plasma (5 of 5)
NCT02480114 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events, (Graded Using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Criteria 4.0)
NCT02480114 (3) [back to overview]Frequency and Severity of General Systemic Symptoms (Surveys Such as the Neurotoxicity Scale, Profile of Mood States, and Quality of Life Form)
NCT02480114 (3) [back to overview]Change in Pain Associated With Radiation-induced Mucositis, (Pain Subscale of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey (VHNSS))
NCT02484222 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Pulse Oxygen Saturation Less Than 95 Percent
NCT02484222 (4) [back to overview]Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT02484222 (4) [back to overview]Rescue Morphine Requirement
NCT02484222 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Were Light Consumers of Morphine as Identified by the Fentanyl Test
NCT02486016 (1) [back to overview]Partial Area Under the Curve (AUC) Attained With Early and Late Heat in Each of the Three Fentanyl TDSs (Reference and Generic)
NCT02494180 (7) [back to overview]Ongoing Pregnancy Rate
NCT02494180 (7) [back to overview]Clinical Pregnancy Rate
NCT02494180 (7) [back to overview]Patient's Satisfaction on Pain Relief
NCT02494180 (7) [back to overview]Pain Level After Oocyte Retrieval
NCT02494180 (7) [back to overview]Pain Level During Oocyte Retrieval
NCT02494180 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Side Effects by Type
NCT02494180 (7) [back to overview]Patient's Satisfaction on Oocyte Retrieval
NCT02521415 (2) [back to overview]Exploratory Outcome: Reduction in Age Appropriate Pain Scale Scores
NCT02521415 (2) [back to overview]Secondary Outcome: Total Dose of Opioid Pain Medication in Morphine Equivalents/kg/Hour
NCT02531971 (1) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-∞ ) ng∙h/mL
NCT02571634 (5) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction Using a Likert Satisfaction Survey
NCT02571634 (5) [back to overview]Sedation Level Assessed by POSS Tool
NCT02571634 (5) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT02571634 (5) [back to overview]Pain Score Differences Using the DVPRS (Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale) Tool.
NCT02571634 (5) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability as Measured by the Number of Adverse Events
NCT02574832 (1) [back to overview]Time to T 10 Level
NCT02584452 (4) [back to overview]Total Postop Opioid Consumption of Patients Receiving (1) Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter Compared to (2) Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Saphenous Nerve Block.
NCT02584452 (4) [back to overview]Subjective Postoperative Pain Score at Post Operative Week 6 of Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter Compared to Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Saphenous Nerve Block
NCT02584452 (4) [back to overview]Quadriceps Strength on POD Week 6- Pts Receiving (1) Long-acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block Comparied to (2) Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter.
NCT02584452 (4) [back to overview]Quadriceps Strength of on POD 1 of Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter Compared to Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Saphenous Nerve Block at 48 Hours After Discharge From PACU
NCT02597478 (5) [back to overview]Walk Time
NCT02597478 (5) [back to overview]Walk Distance
NCT02597478 (5) [back to overview]Modified Dyspnea Borg Scale (Dyspnea Unpleasantness)
NCT02597478 (5) [back to overview]Modified Dyspnea Borg Scale (Dyspnea Intensity)
NCT02597478 (5) [back to overview]Fatigue Modified Borg Score
NCT02604459 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Postoperative Complications
NCT02604459 (3) [back to overview]Severity of Postoperative Delirium
NCT02604459 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Presented With Postoperative Delirium
NCT02616523 (3) [back to overview]Consumption of Fentanyl
NCT02616523 (3) [back to overview]Consumption of Piritramide
NCT02616523 (3) [back to overview]Neuropathic Pain (Pain Questionnaire) dn4
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]PONV Incidence: Number of Participants With Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]Adherence to PONV Guidelines
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]The Number of Prophylactic Interventions for PONV
NCT02625181 (4) [back to overview]Time to Discharge From the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
NCT02683707 (4) [back to overview]Patient Self-reported Pain
NCT02683707 (4) [back to overview]Ticagrelor Pharmacokinetics
NCT02683707 (4) [back to overview]Platelet Reactivity Using Light Transmission Aggregometry
NCT02683707 (4) [back to overview]Single Time-point Platelet Reactivity Using Verify Now
NCT02684942 (6) [back to overview]Ovoids Size
NCT02684942 (6) [back to overview]Meperidine Dose
NCT02684942 (6) [back to overview]Quality of Life
NCT02684942 (6) [back to overview]Fentanyl Dose
NCT02684942 (6) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT02684942 (6) [back to overview]Tumor Size
NCT02691572 (1) [back to overview]Cumulative Fentanyl Dose
NCT02721017 (3) [back to overview]Narcotic Usage
NCT02721017 (3) [back to overview]Mean Neuropathic Pain Score at One Year
NCT02721017 (3) [back to overview]Length of Hospitalization
NCT02747875 (2) [back to overview]Total Opioid Dose, in Morphine Equivalents, in the First 24 Hours After Pediatric Cardiac Bypass Surgery.
NCT02747875 (2) [back to overview]Opioid-related Adverse Events Including: Respiratory Failure, Cardiovascular Instability, and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Respiratory Rate
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Respiratory Rate
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Respiratory Rate
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Oxygen Saturation
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Oxygen Saturation
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Difference From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale Pain Score
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Difference From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale Pain Score
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Difference From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale Pain Score
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Capnometry Value
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Heart Rate
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Heart Rate
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Systolic Blood Pressure
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Heart Rate
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Oxygen Saturation
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Capnometry Value
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Capnometry Value
NCT02778880 (21) [back to overview]Diastolic Blood Pressure
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Cumulative 24 Hour Oral Morphine Equivalent Consumption
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Cumulative 12 Hour Oral Morphine Equivalent Consumption
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Adductor Canal Block Complications
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Nerve Block Complications
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Time to First Use of PCA
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Pain Score
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Incidence of Participants With Nausea/Vomiting Requiring Anti-emetics
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Quality of Recovery (QoR-40)
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Length of Stay
NCT02798835 (10) [back to overview]Cumulative 48 Hour Oral Morphine Equivalent Consumption
NCT02862912 (3) [back to overview]Time to Void
NCT02862912 (3) [back to overview]Time to Resolution of Motor Block
NCT02862912 (3) [back to overview]Time to Ambulate
NCT02880540 (1) [back to overview]Pain Scores (Numerical Rating Scale 0-10) Using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised
NCT02886286 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction
NCT02886286 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)
NCT02886286 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)
NCT02886286 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
NCT02886286 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in painDETECT
NCT02886286 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]NRS Pain Intensity Score at Each Scheduled Time Point After Time 0
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Time (Minutes) to First Perceptible Pain Relief From Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) After Time 0
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Time to Onset of Analgesia
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Time (Minutes) to First Use of Rescue Medication (Duration of Analgesia) Following Each Dose of the Investigational Product (IP)
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Time (Minutes) to Meaningful Pain Relief From Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Time (Minutes) to Peak Pain Relief From Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Pain Relief at Each Scheduled Time Point After Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]NRS Pain Intensity Difference (NRS PID) at Each Categorical Time Point After Time 0
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Peak Pain Relief From Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants Using Rescue Analgesia Over 0 to 24 Hours and Over 0 to 48 Hours
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]NRS SPID After Time 0
NCT02915978 (13) [back to overview]Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over 0 to 48 Hours (NRS SPID-48) After Time 0
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Degree of Motor Blockade Measured as Lowest Recorded Modified Bromage Score
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Volume of Local Anesthetic Received Through Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Per Hour
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Ratio of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Successful Attempts to Unsuccessful Attempts
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Hypotension Requiring Vasopressor Treatment
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Number of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Attempts
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Maximum Reported Labor Pain Score
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Duration of Second Stage of Labor
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Volume of Local Anesthetic Required Per Hour
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Were Satisfied With Procedure
NCT02949271 (10) [back to overview]Total Number of Subjects Experiencing Each Mode of Delivery
NCT02988219 (2) [back to overview]Incidence of Perioperative Cardiac Arrhythmias Evaluated by a Continuous ECG Holter Monitoring in the Perioperative Period
NCT02988219 (2) [back to overview]The Prevention of Cardiac Arrhythmias Occurence by Epidural Anesthesia Added to General Anesthesia Evaluated by a Number and Type of Arrhythmias Observed
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Perceived Stress (PSS)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Parenting Self-efficacy (PMP-SE)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Parenting Self-Efficacy (PMP-SE)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Parent-Infant Attachment (MPAS)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score (EPDS)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Child Development (ASQ-3) Personal Social Score
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Child Development (ASQ-3) Personal Social Score
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Parent-Infant Attachment (MPAS)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score (EPDS)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Currently Breastfeeding at 2 Days Postpartum (Yes/No)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Currently Breastfeeding at 3 Months Postpartum (Yes/No)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants Currently Breastfeeding at 6 Weeks Postpartum (Yes/No)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Pain Score on Average (BPI - Short Form)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Pain Score on Average (BPI - Short Form)
NCT03022526 (15) [back to overview]Pain Score on Average (BPI - Short Form)
NCT03062488 (3) [back to overview]Post Operative Fentanyl Consumption
NCT03062488 (3) [back to overview]Post Operative Pain
NCT03062488 (3) [back to overview]Emergence Agitation (EA) as Measured by Standardized PAED Scale
NCT03071744 (3) [back to overview]Participants With Change in Patient Reported Positional Pain Severity Via the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form
NCT03071744 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Change in Patient Reported Positional Pain Intensity
NCT03071744 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Effects Associated With Lazanda
NCT03084536 (5) [back to overview]Average Pain as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at 1 Year
NCT03084536 (5) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Veterans RAND12 Questionnaire Mental Health Summary Measure
NCT03084536 (5) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Veterans RAND12 Questionnaire Physical Health Summary Measure
NCT03084536 (5) [back to overview]Worst Pain as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at 1 Year
NCT03084536 (5) [back to overview]Interference as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at 1 Year
NCT03105518 (2) [back to overview]Amount of Discomfort
NCT03105518 (2) [back to overview]Amount of Discomfort Following Discharge Until Embryo Transfer
NCT03115151 (1) [back to overview]Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS)
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Postoperative Recovery Time - Ambulation
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Hemodynamic Stability - Blood Pressure
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Cooperation Scale
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Hemodynamic Stability - Heart Rate
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Respiratory Depression - Respiratory Rate
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Surgeon Satisfaction - Survey
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Respiratory Events Requiring Intervention
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Respiratory Depression - Oxygen Saturation
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Reaction to Administration of Local Anesthesia
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Postoperative Recovery Time - Time to Discharge
NCT03255824 (12) [back to overview]Postoperative Recovery Time - Duration of Procedure
NCT03307174 (7) [back to overview]Average Pain Interference
NCT03307174 (7) [back to overview]Total Local Anesthetic Utilized in First 24 Hours
NCT03307174 (7) [back to overview]Worst Reported 24 Hour Pain
NCT03307174 (7) [back to overview]Total Opioid Consumed
NCT03307174 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Hypotension
NCT03307174 (7) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction Score
NCT03307174 (7) [back to overview]Average Pain Severity
NCT03348423 (1) [back to overview]Evaluation of Pain Intensity - Mean Pain Score During Procedure
NCT03383588 (1) [back to overview]Amount of Supplemental Oxycodone Used
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Muscle Spasm
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Pain Score
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Nausea
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Itching
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Hospital Length of Stay
NCT03435692 (6) [back to overview]Total Perioperative Morphine Equivalents
NCT03523000 (9) [back to overview]Change in Medication
NCT03523000 (9) [back to overview]Change in Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (NRS) With Activity
NCT03523000 (9) [back to overview]Adverse Event (AE)
NCT03523000 (9) [back to overview]Change in Oswestry Disability Score (ODI)
NCT03523000 (9) [back to overview]Change in painDETECT Final
NCT03523000 (9) [back to overview]Change in painDETECT Total
NCT03523000 (9) [back to overview]Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
NCT03523000 (9) [back to overview]Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)
NCT03523000 (9) [back to overview]Change in Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (NRS) at Rest
NCT03528512 (6) [back to overview]Change in Vitals
NCT03528512 (6) [back to overview]Nurse and Physician Satisfaction
NCT03528512 (6) [back to overview]Pain Scores During Laceration Repair
NCT03528512 (6) [back to overview]Rates of Failure
NCT03528512 (6) [back to overview]Sedation Score
NCT03528512 (6) [back to overview]Proportion of Children With Maximum Sedation Score
NCT03789318 (5) [back to overview]Total Opioid Consumption
NCT03789318 (5) [back to overview]Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity (SPI) Assessments = AUC of NRS Scores
NCT03789318 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Opioid Free Subjects
NCT03789318 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 96 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03789318 (5) [back to overview]Time to Opioid Cessation or Freedom
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Number of Needle Passes Required to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Failed Spinal Block
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Paresthesia
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Vascular Puncture
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Number of Skin Punctures Required to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Patient Satisfaction
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Rate of Successful Obtaining of Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow at the First Needle Pass
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Rate of Successful Obtaining of Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow at the First Skin Puncture
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Failure to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow
NCT03792191 (10) [back to overview]Duration of the Spinal Procedure
NCT03809182 (7) [back to overview]Plasmatic Glucose Levels (mg/dl).
NCT03809182 (7) [back to overview]Sedation-agitation Scores in the First 12 Postoperative Hours.
NCT03809182 (7) [back to overview]Amount (mg) of Morphine Consumed.
NCT03809182 (7) [back to overview]Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.
NCT03809182 (7) [back to overview]Fentanyl Consumption.
NCT03809182 (7) [back to overview]Pain Scores in the First 24 Postoperative Hours.
NCT03809182 (7) [back to overview]Plasmatic Insulin Levels (uU/ml).
NCT03872700 (7) [back to overview]NRS Pain Score After Irrigation
NCT03872700 (7) [back to overview]NRS Pain Score After Lidocaine Injection
NCT03872700 (7) [back to overview]NRS Pain Score After Packing of Abscess
NCT03872700 (7) [back to overview]NRS Pain Score Following Incision
NCT03872700 (7) [back to overview]Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score at Baseline
NCT03872700 (7) [back to overview]Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score for Overall Procedure
NCT03872700 (7) [back to overview]NRS Pain Score After Blunt Dissection
NCT03882788 (2) [back to overview]Electroencephalogram
NCT03882788 (2) [back to overview]Bayley III
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Pain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Opioid Consumption
NCT03885596 (5) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h
NCT03938857 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Significant Episode of Hypotension
NCT03938857 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing SAEs (Serious Adverse Events)
NCT03938857 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Significant Episode of Urinary Retention
NCT03938857 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Significant Episode of Bradycardia
NCT03938857 (6) [back to overview]Mean Daily Dose of Fentanyl in mcg/kg/hr (Micrograms Per Kilogram Per Hour)
NCT03938857 (6) [back to overview]Mean Number of SAEs (Serious Adverse Events) Experienced by Participants
NCT04136548 (2) [back to overview]Pressure Pain Tolerance
NCT04136548 (2) [back to overview]Cumulative Stress Index
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS)
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Recovery Room Time
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Rescue Milligram Morphine Equivalents (Opioid Use After Intervention Until Discharge)
NCT04177862 (6) [back to overview]Supplemental Oxygen
NCT04561375 (3) [back to overview]Time to Fitness for PACU Discharge
NCT04561375 (3) [back to overview]Total Consumption of Fentanyl in PACU
NCT04561375 (3) [back to overview]Phase 1 Recovery Time
NCT04871425 (4) [back to overview]Provider Satisfaction With Anesthesia Assessed by the VAS
NCT04871425 (4) [back to overview]Satisfaction With Anesthesia Assessed by the ISAS
NCT04871425 (4) [back to overview]Postoperative Pain Assessed by the VAS
NCT04871425 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Administered Additional Pain Medications

Movement

Movement (yes/no) measured during recovery after surgery. (NCT00187135)
Timeframe: The participant was monitored from the end of the procedure until sedation recovery, which lasted a maximum of 65 min. Discharge from the recovery area was determined by hospital standards of care.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
YesNo
Fentanyl 0.5mcg/kg5750
Fentanyl 1mcg/kg4559
Placebo5847

[back to top]

Pain(Yes/No)

"During the sedation recovery period, pain was measured by one of three validated pediatric scales. Scales were applied according to the developmental ability of the participant: Numerical Pain Scale, FACES pain scale, and FLACC pain scale (a score based on behaviors observed: face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability). All three scales are scored from 0 - 10 units on a scale, and are interchangeable for comparison purposes. Any score >0 was coded pain, and score of 0 was coded no pain, yielding one score for each participant's procedure." (NCT00187135)
Timeframe: The participant was monitored from the end of the procedure until sedation recovery, which lasted a maximum of 65 min. Discharge from the recovery area was determined by hospital standards of care.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pain with Fentanyl and pain with PlaceboPain with Fentanyl and no-pain with PlaceboNo-pain with Fentanyl pain with PlaceboNo-pain with Fentanyl no-pain with Placebo
Fentanyl 0.5mcg/kg vs Placebo68560
Fentanyl 1mcg/kg vs Placebo071054

[back to top]

Pain (Yes/No)

"During the sedation recovery period, pain was measured by one of three validated pediatric scales. Scales were applied according to the developmental ability of the participant: Numerical Pain Scale, FACES pain scale, and FLACC pain scale (a score based on behaviors observed: face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability). All three scales are scored from 0 - 10 units on a scale, and are interchangeable for comparison purposes. Any score >0 was coded pain, and score of 0 was coded no pain, yielding one score for each participant's procedure." (NCT00187135)
Timeframe: The participant was monitored from the end of the procedure until sedation recovery, which lasted a maximum of 65 min. Discharge from the recovery area was determined by hospital standards of care.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Pain on Fentanyl (1), Pain on Fentanyl (0.5)Pain on Fentanyl (1) No-pain on Fentanyl (0.5)No-Pain on Fentanyl (1), Pain on Fentanyl (0.5)No-Pain on Fentanyl (1), No-Pain on Fentanyl (0.5)
Fentanyl 0.5mcg/kg vs Fentanyl 1mcg/kg23564

[back to top]

20% or Greater Change in Heart Rate

Measurements of 20% change in Heart Rate (yes/no) taken during recovery after surgery. (NCT00187135)
Timeframe: The participant was monitored from the end of the procedure until sedation recovery, which lasted a maximum of 65 min. Discharge from the recovery area was determined by hospital standards of care.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
YesNo
Fentanyl 0.5mcg/kg7100
Fentanyl 1mcg/kg698
Placebo897

[back to top]

20% or Greater Change in Blood Pressure

Measurements of 20% change in blood pressure(yes/no) taken during recovery after surgery. (NCT00187135)
Timeframe: The participant was monitored from the end of the procedure until sedation recovery, which lasted a maximum of 65 min. Discharge from the recovery area was determined by hospital standards of care.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
YesNo
Fentanyl 0.5mcg/kg1295
Fentanyl 1mcg/kg1094
Placebo1491

[back to top]

20% or Greater Change in Respiratory Rate

Measurements of 20% change in respiratory rate(yes/no) taken during recovery after surgery. (NCT00187135)
Timeframe: The participant was monitored from the end of the procedure until sedation recovery, which lasted a maximum of 65 min. Discharge from the recovery area was determined by hospital standards of care.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
YesNo
Fentanyl 0.5mcg/kg2186
Fentanyl 1mcg/kg2084
Placebo2481

[back to top]

Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of EN3267

(NCT00263575)
Timeframe: screening, 2 week titration period and 12 monthly study visits

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Patients with at least 1 AEPatients with at least 1 AE causing discontinuePatients with at least 1 SAEPatients with an AE resulting in death
Maintenance87234015
Overall116374619
Titration641474

[back to top]

Fentanyl Consumption

the amount of fentanyl is that administered in response to corresponding rest pain levels. Thus, the 0 hour indicates the amount of fentanyl administered from the time of admission until the end of the first hour. Also note that once pain assessments are made every other hour (e.g., 10, 12, 14, and 16), the analgesic totals indicated are for the corresponding 2-hour period after the pain assessment, and were halved to estimate the hourly rate of analgesic consumption. (NCT00286221)
Timeframe: Up to 16 hours

Interventionmcg/hour (Mean)
Supratentorial PCA Fentanyl44.1
Supratentorial PRN Fentanyl23.6
Infratentorial PCA Fentanyl54.8
Infratentorial PRN Fentanyl29.9

[back to top]

Hourly Pain Scores

Patients' Numerical Rating Scale scores (0-10: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) (NCT00286221)
Timeframe: Up to 16 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Supratentorial PCA Fentanyl2.5
Supratentorial PRN Fentanyl3.6
Infratentorial PCA Fentanyl3.7
Infratentorial PRN Fentanyl5.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events.

After the first dose of BEMA Fentanyl, all adverse events were recorded and summarized. (NCT00293020)
Timeframe: Participants were followed for the duration of the study, an average of 126 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Open Label Fentanyl Treatment88.5

[back to top]

PID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 10 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis0.8
Placebo0.7

[back to top]

Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief) at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after taking the study medication or until rescue. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis1.7
Placebo1.3

[back to top]

Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief) at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after taking the study medication or until rescue. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis1.1
Placebo1.0

[back to top]

Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief) at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after taking the study medication or until rescue. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 10 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis0.8
Placebo0.7

[back to top]

Episodes With Complete Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief).Percentage of episodes with complete relief per subject is analyzed where a complete pain relief episode is defined as pain relief of value 4 at the specified time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis1.7
Placebo1.3

[back to top]

Episodes With Complete Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief). Percentage of episodes with complete relief per subject is analyzed where a complete pain relief episode is defined as pain relief of value 4 at the specified time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis12.8
Placebo7.2

[back to top]

Episodes With Complete Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief). Percentage of episodes with complete relief per subject is analyzed where a complete pain relief episode is defined as pain relief of value 4 at the specified time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 5 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis0.7
Placebo0.7

[back to top]

Episodes With Complete Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief). Percentage of episodes with complete relief per subject is analyzed where a complete pain relief episode is defined as pain relief of value 4 at the specified time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 45 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis9.4
Placebo6.4

[back to top]

Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief) at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after taking the study medication or until rescue. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 45 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis1.9
Placebo1.5

[back to top]

Episodes With Complete Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief). Percentage of episodes with complete relief per subject is analyzed where a complete pain relief episode is defined as pain relief of value 4 at the specified time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis5.4
Placebo2.6

[back to top]

Episodes With at Least 50% Decreases in Pain

Number of episodes where the total pain score has at least a 50% reduction from baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionepisodes (Mean)
Onsolis46.1
Placebo34.0

[back to top]

Episodes With at Least 50% Decreases in Pain

Number of episodes where the total pain score has at least a 50% reduction from baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 45 minutes

Interventionepisodes (Mean)
Onsolis41.1
Placebo30.5

[back to top]

Episodes With Complete Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief).Percentage of episodes with complete relief per subject is analyzed where a complete pain relief episode is defined as pain relief of value 4 at the specified time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis1.0
Placebo0.7

[back to top]

Episodes With at Least 50% Decreases in Pain

Number of episodes where the total pain score has at least a 50% reduction from baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

Interventionepisodes (Mean)
Onsolis32.8
Placebo24.1

[back to top]

Episodes With at Least 50% Decreases in Pain

Number of episodes where the total pain score has at least a 50% reduction from baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

Interventionepisodes (Mean)
Onsolis14.9
Placebo14.7

[back to top]

Episodes With at Least 33% Decreases in Pain

Number of episodes where the total pain score has at least a 50% reduction from baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionepisodes (Mean)
Onsolis64.3
Placebo48.2

[back to top]

PID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis1.4
Placebo1.2

[back to top]

PID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis2.5
Placebo1.9

[back to top]

PID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 45 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis3.0
Placebo2.3

[back to top]

PID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis0.3
Placebo0.3

[back to top]

PID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis3.3
Placebo2.4

[back to top]

Rescue Medication Usage

Rescue medication is medication taken if adequate pain relief is not realized within 30 minutes following application of the study drug. Percentage of episodes when rescue medication was used per subject is analyzed. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 28 Days

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis30.0
Placebo44.6

[back to top]

SPID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is -10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome.SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the pain intensity difference of all time points at or before the time point of interest. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 0-10 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis5.9
Placebo4.9

[back to top]

SPID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is -10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome.SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the pain intensity difference of all time points at or before the time point of interest. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 0-15 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis12.8
Placebo10.4

[back to top]

SPID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is -10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome.SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the pain intensity difference of all time points at or before the time point of interest. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 0-45 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis90.5
Placebo70.8

[back to top]

SPID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is -10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome.SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the pain intensity difference of all time points at or before the time point of interest. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 0-5 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis1.8
Placebo1.5

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) is calculated as the weighted sum of the pain relief (PR) of all time points at or prior to the time point of interest.Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief)compared to baseline (pre-dose) (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 5 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis2.2
Placebo1.8

[back to top]

SPID

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is -10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome.SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the pain intensity difference of all time points at or before the time point of interest. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 0-60 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis138.0
Placebo106.0

[back to top]

SPID in Neuropathic Pain Subpopulation

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is -10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the pain intensity difference of all time points at or before the time point of interest for the Neuropathic pain subpopulation for relevant time points (15, 30, 45, 60 minutes). Neuropathic pain subpopulation is a subset of ITT population who have neuropathic pain at baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis13.8
Placebo7.8

[back to top]

SPID in Neuropathic Pain Subpopulation

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is -10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the pain intensity difference of all time points at or before the time point of interest for the Neuropathic pain subpopulation for relevant time points (15, 30, 45, 60 minutes). Neuropathic pain subpopulation is a subset of ITT population who have neuropathic pain at baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis51.6
Placebo31.8

[back to top]

SPID in Neuropathic Pain Subpopulation

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is -10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the pain intensity difference of all time points at or before the time point of interest for the Neuropathic pain subpopulation for relevant time points (15, 30, 45, 60 minutes). Neuropathic pain subpopulation is a subset of ITT population who have neuropathic pain at baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 45 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis93.0
Placebo59.7

[back to top]

Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief) at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after taking the study medication or until rescue. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis2.1
Placebo1.6

[back to top]

Pain Relief

Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief) at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after taking the study medication or until rescue. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after dosing

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis0.4
Placebo0.4

[back to top]

SPID in Neuropathic Pain Subpopulation

Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is -10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the pain intensity difference of all time points at or before the time point of interest for the Neuropathic pain subpopulation for relevant time points (15, 30, 45, 60 minutes). Neuropathic pain subpopulation is a subset of ITT population who have neuropathic pain at baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis137.8
Placebo90.9

[back to top]

Episodes With at Least 33% Decreases in Pain

Number of episodes where the total pain score has at least a 33% reduction from baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

Interventionepisodes (Mean)
Onsolis26.4
Placebo21.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Pain Free Episodes

A pain free episode is one with 0 pain intensity at the specified time point. Percentage of episodes that are pain-free per subject is analyzed. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis1.0
Placebo1.4

[back to top]

Episodes With at Least 33% Decreases in Pain

Number of episodes where the total pain score has at least a 33% reduction from baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 45 minutes

Interventionepisodes (Mean)
Onsolis57.5
Placebo46.5

[back to top]

Subject Overall Satisfaction With Study Drug

Subjects evaluated their overall satisfaction with study drug at the time rescue medication was consumed or at the 60-minute time point using a 5-point categorical scale (0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = very good, and 4 = excellent). (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 60 minutes or at time of rescue medication use

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis2.0
Placebo1.5

[back to top]

Summary of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID)

"Pain intensity (using an 11-point [0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain] numeric scale) was recorded at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after dosing. Pain intensity difference (PID) was defined as the baseline pain score minus the pain score of each time point. The primary endpoint was the Summary of Pain Intensity Differences at 30 minutes after dosing (SPID 30) in ITT population for Onsolis versus placebo during double-blind period of study. SPID was calculated as a weighted sum of the PID of all time points at or before time point of interest.Range of possible SPID values is~-10X time point (minutes) to 10X time point (minutes). Higher value indicates a better outcome." (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 0-30 minutes

InterventionScore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Onsolis47.9
Placebo38.1

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) is calculated as the weighted sum of the pain relief (PR) of all time points at or prior to the time point of interest. Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief)compared to baseline (pre-dose) (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 10 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis6.1
Placebo5.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Pain Free Episodes

A pain free episode is one with 0 pain intensity at the specified time point. Percentage of episodes that are pain-free per subject is analyzed. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis2.3
Placebo2.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Pain Free Episodes

A pain free episode is one with 0 pain intensity at the specified time point. Percentage of episodes that are pain-free per subject is analyzed. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis5.3
Placebo4.4

[back to top]

Episodes With at Least 33% Decreases in Pain

Number of episodes where the total pain score has at least a 33% reduction from baseline. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

Interventionepisodes (Mean)
Onsolis47.3
Placebo38.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Pain Free Episodes

A pain free episode is one with 0 pain intensity at the specified time point. Percentage of episodes that are pain-free per subject is analyzed. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 45 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis10.5
Placebo6.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Pain Free Episodes

A pain free episode is one with 0 pain intensity at the specified time point. Percentage of episodes that are pain-free per subject is analyzed. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 5 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis1.0
Placebo1.4

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) is calculated as the weighted sum of the pain relief (PR) of all time points at or prior to the time point of interest. Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief)compared to baseline (pre-dose) (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 15 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis11.6
Placebo9.8

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) is calculated as the weighted sum of the pain relief (PR) of all time points at or prior to the time point of interest. Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief)compared to baseline (pre-dose) (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis36.1
Placebo29.5

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) is calculated as the weighted sum of the pain relief (PR) of all time points at or prior to the time point of interest. Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief)compared to baseline (pre-dose) (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 45 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis64.2
Placebo52.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Pain Free Episodes

A pain free episode is one with 0 pain intensity at the specified time point. Percentage of episodes that are pain-free per subject is analyzed. (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionpercentage of episodes (Mean)
Onsolis14.2
Placebo9.6

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) is calculated as the weighted sum of the pain relief (PR) of all time points at or prior to the time point of interest. Pain relief (PR) is measured using a 5-point categorical scale (0=no relief to 4=complete relief)compared to baseline (pre-dose) (NCT00293033)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Onsolis94.8
Placebo76.0

[back to top]

Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - Patient's Walking Ability - at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) investigators completed the Clinical Assessment of Patient Function Scale which asks 5 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the patient's walking ability. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets00481483110

[back to top]

Summary of Participants' Successful Dosing Levels of Fentanyl Buccal Tablets to Control Episodes of Breakthrough Pain (BTP)

During the dose titration period, participants self-administered FBT, starting at 100, 200 or 400 mcg (depending on analgesic used pre-study) and titrated to 600 and 800 mcg if needed. For each breakthrough pain (BTP) episode, participants took a dose, and did not take further study drug if adequate pain relief was achieved. If pain was not controlled within 30 minutes, the same dose level was repeated. If pain relief was inadequate 30 minutes after the second dose, usual rescue medication was taken for that BTP episode. Doses were adjusted until pain relief was adequate and side effects were tolerated. This outcome summarizes the successful dose levels identified during the titration period. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: up to 10 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
100 mcg200 mcg400 mcg600 mcg800 mcgNone (no successful dose)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets184941314138

[back to top]

Patient Assessment of Ability to Walk at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) participants completed the Patient Assessment of Function Scale which asks 7 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the ability to walk. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets31576423611

[back to top]

Patient Assessment of Ability to Perform at Work at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) participants completed the Patient Assessment of Function Scale which asks 7 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the ability to perform at work and includes both work outside the home and housework. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets4166941459

[back to top]

Patient Assessment of Ability to Participate in Social Events at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) participants completed the Patient Assessment of Function Scale which asks 7 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the ability to participate in social events. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets1368046345

[back to top]

Patient Assessment of Ability to Have Sex at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) participants completed the Patient Assessment of Function Scale which asks 7 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the ability to have sex. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets42312918125

[back to top]

Patient Assessment of Ability to Go to Work at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) participants completed the Patient Assessment of Function Scale which asks 7 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the ability to go to work. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets2025114136

[back to top]

Patient Assessment of Ability to Enjoy Life at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) participants completed the Patient Assessment of Function Scale which asks 7 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the ability to enjoy life. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets21666483814

[back to top]

Medication Preference From the Pain Flare Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Approximately Week 5

The summary question from the Pain Flare Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire asked participants which medication they preferred to use for their break-through pain. Options were 1) Prior medication 2) Study medication 3) no preference (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Prior medicationStudy medicationNo preference
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets3811521

[back to top]

Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - Patient's Relationship With Others - at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) investigators completed the Clinical Assessment of Patient Function Scale which asks 5 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the patient's relationship with others. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets0019835329

[back to top]

Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - Patient's Enjoyment of Life - at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) investigators completed the Clinical Assessment of Patient Function Scale which asks 5 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the patient's enjoyment of life. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets02169454315

[back to top]

Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - Patient's Ability to Work/Perform Activities of Daily Living - at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) investigators completed the Clinical Assessment of Patient Function Scale which asks 5 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the patient's ability to work and perform activities of daily living. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets01563553912

[back to top]

Clinical Assessment of Patient Function - General Activities - at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) investigators completed the Clinical Assessment of Patient Function Scale which asks 5 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the patient's general activities. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets0145857469

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory Subscales at Approximately Week 5

Change from baseline to endpoint (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) in the Multidimensional Pain Inventory Subscales. Answers to questions in the MPI are captured on a 7-point scale, with 0=most positive answer and 6= least positive answer. Twenty questions focus on pain, fourteen on a significant other's response when participant is in pain, and eighteen questions about daily activities. There are a total of 13 subscales with variable ranges. Subscales and corresponding ranges are listed in the results table. The General Activity category combines the Household Chores, Outdoor Work, Activities Away from Home, and Social Activities categories. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately week 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Interference (0-54)Support (0-18)Pain Severity (0-18)Life-Control (0-12)Affective Distress (0-18)Negative Responses (0-24)Solicitous Responses (0-24)Distracting Responses (0-36)Household Chores (0-30)Outdoor Work (0-30)Activities Away from Home (0-24)Social Activities (0-24)General Activity (0-108)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets-0.2-0.0-0.30.1-0.1-0.10.10.20.1-0.00.10.00.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) Subscale Scores at Approximately Week 5

The change from baseline to approximately week 5 in the PASS subscale scores. PASS asks participants to indicate how often they engage in each of the 40 thoughts or activities that represent anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0=never to 5=always. Those 40 questions are organized into four subscales: fear, cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety, and escape/avoidance. Each subscale score is obtained by summing the answers to the ten items in the subscore resulting in a range of 0-50. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately week 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FearCognitive anxietySomatic anxietyEscape/avoidance
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets-0.5-1.10.4-0.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) Total Score at Approximately Week 5

The change from baseline to approximately week 5 in the PASS total score. PASS asks participants to indicate how often they engage in each of the 40 thoughts or activities that represent anxiety symptoms on a scale of 0=never to 5=always. The total score has a range of 0-200. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately week 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets-1.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Beck Depression Inventory at Approximately Week 5

Change from baseline to endpoint (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) in the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The BDI is a self-reporting instrument that asks 21 questions regarding how the participant felt in the past few days. Answers are in sentence form, and offer a scale where the first answer (worth 0 points) indicates no depression and the fourth answer (worth 3 points) indicates significant depression. Totals (0-63) are grouped so that totals of 1-10 are interpreted as 'These ups and downs are considered normal' and scores >40 indicate extreme depression. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately week 5

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets-1.1

[back to top]

Patient Assessment of Ability to Exercise at Approximately Week 5

At the endpoint of the study (week 4 of Treatment period or last post baseline visit) participants completed the Patient Assessment of Function Scale which asks 7 questions about the effect of study treatment on the patient's ability to function. This question asks about the ability to exercise. (NCT00387010)
Timeframe: approximately week 5

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much worsenedMuch worsenedSlightly worsenedUnchangedSlightly improvedMuch improvedVery much improved
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets3159046219

[back to top]

Duration of Labor Analgesia

Time in minutes from initiation of labor analgesia until delivery of the infant (NCT00443560)
Timeframe: Time form initiation of labor analgesia to delivery (up to 24 hours)

Interventionminutes (Median)
Instrumental Vaginal Delivery (IVD)420
Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery (SVD)300

[back to top]

Number of Parturients With a Decrease in the Infusion of Epidural Analgesia During Second Stage of Labor

At the request of the obstetric provider, second stage analgesia density was decreased by decreasing the basal infusion rate if there was dissatisfaction with the progress of labor or a perceived inability to push. The basal infusion was never totally discontinued. (NCT00443560)
Timeframe: Second stage of labor up to 3 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Instrumental Vaginal Delivery (IVD)146
Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery (SVD)51

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Breakthrough Pain in the First Stage of Labor

Pain not responding to epidural analgesia in the first stage of labor was treated with bolus dose of bupivacaine 1.25 mg/mL or lidocaine 10 mg/mL, 10 to 15 mL. If pain relief was obtained the infusion concentration was increased. If the patient had no pain relief following the bolus injection, the epidural catheter was replaced. (NCT00443560)
Timeframe: Supplemental analgesia in first stage of labor (<24 hours)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Supplemental bolusInfusion increaseConcentration increase
Instrumental Vaginal Delivery (IVD)80214932
Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery (SVD)2438719

[back to top]

Change in Baseline Cortisol

change from baseline cortisol (drawn prior to RSI) to 2nd cortisol level (4-6hrs after RSI, but before stim test) (NCT00462644)
Timeframe: 4-6hr after RSI

Interventionmicrograms/dL (Mean)
Etomidate-12.8
Fentanyl-Midazolam1.1

[back to top]

Cortisol Level 60 Minutes After Cortisol Stimulating Test (CST)

(NCT00462644)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after administration of cotrosyn

Interventionmicrograms/dL (Mean)
Etomidate22.91
Fentanyl-Midazolam39.09

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay

days from admission to hospital discharge (NCT00462644)
Timeframe: time to hospital discharge in days

Interventiondays (Mean)
Etomidate13.9
Fentanyl-Midazolam6.4

[back to top]

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay

ICU length of stay in days (NCT00462644)
Timeframe: time from hospital admission to transfer out of ICU to floor bed

Interventiondays (Mean)
Etomidate8.1
Fentanyl-Midazolam3.0

[back to top]

Number of Deaths

deaths (NCT00462644)
Timeframe: death in hospital

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Etomidate2
Fentanyl-Midazolam0

[back to top]

Postintubation Cortisol (Baseline Cortisol Level)

cortisol level after randomization and rapid sequence induction (NCT00462644)
Timeframe: postintubation (baseline cortisol level)

Interventionmicrograms/dL (Mean)
Etomidate18.2
Fentanyl-Midazolam27.9

[back to top]

Ventilator Days

(NCT00462644)
Timeframe: time from intubation to extubation

Interventiondays (Mean)
Etomidate6.3
Fentanyl-Midazolam1.5

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID 10) at 10 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID10 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 10 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 10 minutes after administration of study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)0.30
Immediate-Release Oxycodone0.22

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (%PID) at 10 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID10 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 10 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. The percentage is calculated as the PID at 10 minutes divided by the baseline PI score times 100. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 10 minutes after study drug administration

InterventionPercentage change in units on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)4.08
Immediate-Release Oxycodone3.16

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID5 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. The percentage is calculated as the PID at 5 minutes divided by the baseline PI score times 100. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 5 minutes after administration of study drug

InterventionPercent change in units on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)1.11
Immediate-Release Oxycodone0.73

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 45 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID45 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 45 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. The percentage is calculated as the PID at 45 minutes divided by the baseline PI score times 100. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 45 minutes after study drug administration

InterventionPercent change in units on scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)40.94
Immediate-Release Oxycodone37.56

[back to top]

Percent Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes Posttreatment (%TOTPAR)

The PR score at set intervals after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). The maximum TOTPAR score that could be achieved at 60 minutes is equal to 16; thus, %TOTPAR at 60 minutes is (TOTPAR60 /16) times 100.The % TOTPAR achieved 60 minutes after the administration of study drug was calculated during the double-blind treatment phase. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: From 5 minutes through 60 minutes after study drug treatment

InterventionPercent change in units on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)39.48
Immediate-Release Oxycodone35.28

[back to top]

Standard Rescue Medication Usage

Any use of standard rescue medication after the administration of study drug for relief of Breakthrough Pain (BTP) during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The number of breakthrough pain episodes for which study drug treatment was administered and which required rescue medication use was recorded. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: During the administration of study drug during the double blind treatment periods.

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)144
Immediate-Release Oxycodone131

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score (PR) at 45 Minutes

The PR score 45 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: 45 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)2.08
Immediate-Release Oxycodone1.89

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score (PR) at 30 Minutes

The PR score 30 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)1.50
Immediate-Release Oxycodone1.23

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score (PR) at 15 Minutes

The PR score 15 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)0.69
Immediate-Release Oxycodone0.53

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=10 Minutes

The time to MPR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment periods. Meaningful pain relief was defined as a subject reduction of pain intensity that the subject found to be meaningful (substantive). For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 min, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to MPR fell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in less than or equal to 10 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Time of study drug treatment until 10 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)92
Immediate-Release Oxycodone83

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score (PR) at 10 Minutes

The PR score 10 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: 10 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)0.30
Immediate-Release Oxycodone0.25

[back to top]

Pain Relief (PR) Score at 5 Minutes

The PR score 5 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Five minutes after administration of study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)0.10
Immediate-Release Oxycodone0.09

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID15) At 15 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID15 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and fifteen minutes after administration of study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)0.82
Immediate-Release Oxycodone0.59

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID 60) at 60 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID60 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 60 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 60 minutes after administration of study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)3.35
Immediate-Release Oxycodone3.19

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID 5) at 5 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID5 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 5 minutes after study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)0.08
Immediate-Release Oxycodone0.05

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID 45) at 45 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID45 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 45 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 45 minutes after study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)2.87
Immediate-Release Oxycodone2.59

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID 30) at 30 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID30 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 10 minutes after study drug administration

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)1.96
Immediate-Release Oxycodone1.58

[back to top]

Pain Flare Treatment Satisfaction (PFTS) Questionnaire - Question 21 at the End of the Second Double-blind Treatment Period (Visit 6)

The PFTS is used to measure patient's satisfaction with study drug. Although the full scale has 25 questions, the question that is most useful (and least redundant with prior scales) for assessing the efficacy of the study drug is Question 21 which states: Which medication would you prefer to use when treating your pain flares? The subject can choose either: Prior medication, Study medication, or No preference. The number of subjects in each treatment group at the end of the second double-blind treatment period (Visit 6) who responded to each option is presented. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: At the end of the second double-blind treatment period (Visit 6)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Prior MedicationStudy MedicationNo Preference
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)106310
Immediate-Release Oxycodone19599

[back to top]

Pain Flare Treatment Satisfaction (PFTS) Questionnaire - Question 21 at the End of the First Double-blind Treatment Period (Visit 5)

The PFTS is used to measure patient's satisfaction with study drug. Although the full scale has 25 questions, the question that is most useful (and least redundant with prior scales) for assessing the efficacy of the study drug is Question 21 which states: Which medication would you prefer to use when treating your pain flares? The subject can choose either: Prior medication, Study medication, or No preference. The number of subjects in each treatment group at the end of the first double-blind treatment period (Visit 5) who responded to each option is presented. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: The end of the first double-blind treatment period.

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Prior MedicationStudy MedicationNo Preference
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)156112
Immediate-Release Oxycodone225018

[back to top]

Pain Flare Treatment Satisfaction (PFTS) Questionnaire - Question 21 at Endpoint (End of Second Double-blind Treatment Period or Last Observation After Start of Treatment Period)

The PFTS is used to measure patient's satisfaction with study drug. Although the full scale has 25 questions, the question that is most useful (and least redundant with prior scales) for assessing the efficacy of the study drug is Question 21 which states: Which medication would you prefer to use when treating your pain flares? The subject can choose either: Prior medication, Study medication, or No preference. The number of subjects in each treatment group at the Endpoint (time of the last observation during the treatment period)who responded to each option is presented. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Endpoint (End of second double-blind treatment period or last observation after start of treatment period)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Prior MedicationStudy MedicationNo Preference
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)116612
Immediate-Release Oxycodone196312

[back to top]

Medication Performance Assessment 60 Minutes After-treatment

"The medication performance assessment assessed study drug performance on a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=poor, 1=fair,2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent) 60 minutes after administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment periods and for the first 5 BTP episodes after each visit during the open-label extension period were recorded in the patient's paper diary. Patients were asked How well did your study medication perform in controlling this breakthrough pain episode? The number of episodes rated for each category were recorded." (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: 60 minutes post-treatment

,
InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
ExcellentVery goodGoodFairPoorNo response
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)15856267921012827
Immediate-Release Oxycodone10142472633514626

[back to top]

Medication Performance Assessment 30 Minutes After-treatment

"The medication performance assessment assessed study drug performance on a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=poor, 1=fair,2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent) 30 minutes after administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment periods and for the first 5 BTP episodes after each visit during the open-label extension period were recorded in the patient's paper diary. Patients were asked How well did your study medication perform in controlling this breakthrough pain episode? The number of episodes rated for each category were recorded." (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post-treatment

,
InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
ExcellentVery goodGoodFairPoorNo response
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)45153533450334249
Immediate-Release Oxycodone18104343566489238

[back to top]

Breakthrough Pain Preference Questionnaire

The BTP preference questionnaire is a questionnaire used to measure patients' preference for FBT or immediate-release oxycodone for management of BTP. The question is used to determine a patient's preference between the study drugs given in the 2 double-blind treatment periods. The patient was asked to select 1 of the following: 1, a preference for study drug used in the 1st double-blind treatment period; 2, a preference for study drug used in the 2nd double-blind treatment period; or 3, no preference. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: After completion of both double-blind treatment periods or early termination

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Preferred Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)Preferred Immediate-Release OxycodoneNo preferenceMissing
Total99631513

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR60) at 60 Minutes

"The mean TOTPAR at 60 minutes will be calculated for each episode as the weighted sum of Pain Relief (PR) scores (5-point Likert scale, 0 = none to 4 = complete) at each assessment of PR (during the double-blind treatment period) until 60 minutes after study drug administration, as follows:~TOTPAR60 =(⅓ x PR5)+ (⅓ x PR10) +(⅓ x PR15)+ PR30 + PR45 + PR60. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry." (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: From 5 minutes to 60 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)6.32
Immediate-Release Oxycodone5.63

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=60 Minutes

The time to MPR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment periods. Meaningful pain relief was defined as a subject reduction of pain intensity that the subject found to be meaningful (substantive). For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 min, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to MPR fell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in less than or equal to 60 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Time of study drug administration until 60 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)1359
Immediate-Release Oxycodone1313

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=45 Minutes

The time to MPR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment periods. Meaningful pain relief was defined as a subject reduction of pain intensity that the subject found to be meaningful (substantive). For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 min, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to MPR fell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in less than or equal to 45 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: From study drug administration until 45 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)1179
Immediate-Release Oxycodone1060

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=30 Minutes

The time to MPR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment periods. Meaningful pain relief was defined as a subject reduction of pain intensity that the subject found to be meaningful (substantive). For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 min, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to MPR fell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in less than or equal to 30 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Time of study drug administration until 30 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)787
Immediate-Release Oxycodone636

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <=15 Minutes

The time to MPR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment periods. Meaningful pain relief was defined as a subject reduction of pain intensity that the subject found to be meaningful (substantive). For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 min, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to MPR fell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in less than or equal to 15 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Time of study drug administration until 15 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)286
Immediate-Release Oxycodone211

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score (PR) at 60 Minutes

The PR score 60 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)2.38
Immediate-Release Oxycodone2.24

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment, <= 5 Minutes

Time to MPR was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during the double-blind treatment period. Meaningful pain relief was defined as a subject reduction of pain intensity that the subject found to be meaningful (substantive). For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to meaningful pain relief fell into that category was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: From time study drug was taken until 5 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)9
Immediate-Release Oxycodone18

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=60 Minutes

The time to APR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment periods. Any pain relief was defined as any subjective reduction in pain severity, even if not meaningful to patient. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to APRfell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which APR was achieved in less than or equal to 60 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Time of study drug treatment until 60 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)1559
Immediate-Release Oxycodone1565

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=45 Minutes

The time to APR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment periods. Any pain relief was defined as any subjective reduction in pain severity, even if not meaningful to patient. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to APRfell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which APR was achieved in less than or equal to 45 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Time of study drug treatment until 45 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)1499
Immediate-Release Oxycodone1480

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=30 Minutes

The time to APR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment periods. Any pain relief was defined as any subjective reduction in pain severity, even if not meaningful to patient. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to APRfell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which APR was achieved in less than or equal to 30 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Time of study drug administration till 30 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)1259
Immediate-Release Oxycodone1157

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=15 Minutes

The time to APR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment periods. Any pain relief was defined as any subjective reduction in pain severity, even if not meaningful to patient. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to APR fell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which APR was achieved in less than or equal to 15 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: From study drug administration to 15 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)687
Immediate-Release Oxycodone540

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <=10 Minutes

The time to APR was measured by stopwatch and scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during the double-blind treatment periods. Any pain relief was defined as any subjective reduction in pain severity, even if not meaningful to patient. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to APR fell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which APR was achieved in less than or equal to 10 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: From study drug treatment until 10 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)286
Immediate-Release Oxycodone215

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment, <= 5 Minutes

Time to APR was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes after baseline during double-blind treatment period. Any pain relief was defined as any subjective reduction in pain severity, even if not meaningful to patient. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes for which the time to APR fell into that category was compared. Here the number of episodes in which APR was achieved in less than or equal to 5 minutes was compared. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: From time was administered to 5 minutes after treatment

InterventionNumber of episodes treated (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)48
Immediate-Release Oxycodone33

[back to top]

Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 60 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID60)

"PI scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine during the double-blind treatment period. The SPID60 was derived from PID values. The SPID60 scores during the double-blind treatment phase were calculated as the time- weighted sum of the PID scores from 5 through 60 minutes,after the administration of the study drug.~SPID60 = SPID30 + PID45 + PID60. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry." (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: From 5 minutes after dosing through 60 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)8.58
Immediate-Release Oxycodone7.65

[back to top]

Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 30 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID30)

PI scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. SPID30 were derived from PID values. The SPID30 scores during the double-blind treatment phase were calculated as the time- weighted sum of the PID scores from 5 through 30 minutes,after the administration of study drug. SPID30 = (⅓ x PID5) + (⅓ x PID10) + (⅓ x PID15) + PID30. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: From 5 minutes after dosing through 30 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)2.36
Immediate-Release Oxycodone1.87

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (%PID) at 60 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID60 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 60 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. The percentage is calculated as the PID at 60 minutes divided by the baseline PI score times 100. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 60 minutes after study drug administration

InterventionPercent change in units on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)48.08
Immediate-Release Oxycodone46.16

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (%PID) at 30 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID30 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. The percentage is calculated as the PID at 30 minutes divided by the baseline PI score times 100. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 30 minutes after study drug administration

InterventionPercent change in units on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)27.83
Immediate-Release Oxycodone23.06

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (%PID) at 15 Minutes

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID15 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. The percentage is calculated as the PID at 15 minutes divided by the baseline PI score times 100. (NCT00463047)
Timeframe: Immediately before and 15 minutes after administration of study drug

InterventionPercent change in units on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablets (FBT)11.40
Immediate-Release Oxycodone8.59

[back to top]

Duration of Agitation

Cole EA scale 1=calm , 5=unconsolable (NCT00468052)
Timeframe: on arrival to PACU and for 2 hours postoperatively

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Fentanyl11.85
Dexmedetomidine6.59

[back to top]

Participants Requiring Morphine Rescue in PACU

(NCT00468052)
Timeframe: arrival in PACU to 2 hours postoperatively

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fentanyl25
Dexmedetomidine11

[back to top]

Time to Awaken

defined as spontaneous eye opening or on command (NCT00468052)
Timeframe: at end of surgery

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Fentanyl (F) Group8.75
Dexmedetomidine7.18

[back to top]

Time to Extubation

defined as time from end of surgery to tracheal extubation (NCT00468052)
Timeframe: at end of surgical procedure

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Fentanyl (F) Group10.44
Dexmedetomidine8.59

[back to top]

Emergence Agitation and Pain

"emergence agitation and pain will be assessed. Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium Scale (PAED) range 0-20 a lower score indicates the child is calm and the higher score indicates severe agitation. Cole Agitation Scale was employed which is a 5 point Likert scale. Parameters ranging 1 to 5 1=child is calm and 5 =the child is severly agitated .~Objective Pain Score range is 0-10 (higher score the greater pain). 3 Parameters are captured systolic b/p,crying, movements, agitation , complaints of pain" (NCT00468052)
Timeframe: On arrival to PACU and 2 hours postoperatively

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
PAEDCole EAOPS
Dexmedetomidine1033
Fentanyl (F) Group1445

[back to top]

Hemodynamic Stability

Participants whose heart rate per minute was below 60 intraoperatively. Participants whose systolic blood pressure dremonstrated < 30% decrease from baseline and sustained for 5 minutes received rescue as defined by the protocol. (NCT00468052)
Timeframe: intraoperatively

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
heart rate below 60 bpmsystolic blood pressure <30% below baseline
Dexmedetomidine00
Fentanyl (F) Group00

[back to top]

Number of Participants With SpO2 < or Equal to 95%

(NCT00468052)
Timeframe: on arrival to PACU and 2 hours postoperatively

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fentanyl2
Dexmedetomidine4

[back to top]

Duration of Hospital Stay.

Duration of hospital stay defined as time from start anesthesia to leaving the hospital (NCT00527332)
Timeframe: Within 6 months after surgery

InterventionHours (Median)
Spinal Anesthesia46
General Anesthesia50

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 Minutes After Dosing

Pain relief (PAR) was assessed by the participant on a 5-point scale (1=No relief, 2=A little relief, 3=Moderate relief, 4=A lot of relief, 5=Complete relief) at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after each dose of study medication during each breakthrough pain episode. TOTPAR was calculated as the time-weighted sum of the PAR scores at each time point using the following formulas: TOTPAR5=(5*PAR5), TOTPAR10=(5*PAR5)+(5*PAR10), TOTPAR15=(5*PAR5)+(5*PAR10)+(5*PAR15), TOTPAR30=(5*PAR5)+(5*PAR10)+(5*PAR15)+(15*PAR30), TOTPAR45=(5*PAR5)+(5*PAR10)+(5*PAR15)+(15*PAR30)+(15*PAR45), TOTPAR60=(5*PAR5)+(5*PAR10)+(5*PAR15)+(15*PAR30) +(15*PAR45) +(15*PAR60). The minimum and maximum TOTPAR5, TOTPAR10, TOTPAR15, TOTPAR30, TOTPAR45, and TOTPAR60 scores were 5 to 25, 10 to 50, 15 to 75, 30 to 150, 45 to 225, and 60 to 300, respectively. A higher score indicates more pain relief. (NCT00538850)
Timeframe: 5 through 60 minutes after dosing for each pain episode

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
TOTPAR5TOTPAR10TOTPAR15TOTPAR30TOTPAR45TOTPAR60
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray8.619.732.978.3126.3176.4
Placebo7.616.727.161.095.5131.2

[back to top]

Summed Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) at 30 Minutes After Dosing (SPID30)

"Pain intensity was assessed by the participant using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale where 0 represented no pain and 100 represented worst possible pain at 0 (baseline, beginning of the pain episode), 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes after each dose of study medication during each breakthrough pain episode. The pain intensity difference was defined as the difference in pain intensity at the various time points versus time 0 (baseline). SPID30 was calculated as the time-weighted sum of the PID scores using the following formula: SPID30=(5*PID5)+(5*PID10)+(5*PID15)+(15*PID30). The minimum and maximum SPID30 scores were -3000 and 3000. A higher score indicates less pain." (NCT00538850)
Timeframe: Baseline (time 0, beginning of each pain episode) through 30 minutes after dosing for each pain episode

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray640.3
Placebo399.6

[back to top]

Summed Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) at 5, 10, 15, 45, and 60 Minutes After Dosing

"Pain intensity was assessed by the participant using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale where 0 represented no pain and 100 represented worst possible pain at 0 (baseline, beginning of the pain episode), 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after each dose of study medication during each breakthrough pain episode. The pain intensity difference was defined as the difference in pain intensity at the various time points versus time 0 (baseline). SPID was calculated as the time-weighted sum of the PID scores using the following formulas: SPID5=(5*PID5), SPID10=(5*PID5)+(5*PID10), SPID15=(5*PID5)+(5*PID10)+(5*PID15), SPID30=(5*PID5)+(5*PID10)+(5*PID15)+(15*PID30), SPID45=(5*PID5)+(5*PID10)+(5*PID15)+(15*PID30)+(15*PID45), SPID60=(5*PID5)+(5*PID10)+(5*PID15)+(15*PID30) +(15*PID45) +(15*PID60). The minimum and maximum SPID scores were -500 to 500, -1000 to 1000, -1500 to 1500, -3000 to 3000, -4500 to 4500, and -6000 to 6000, respectively. A higher score indicates less pain." (NCT00538850)
Timeframe: Baseline (time 0, beginning of each pain episode) through 60 minutes after dosing for each pain episode

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
SPID5SPID10SPID15SPID45SPID60
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray40.3115.0220.61122.01649.0
Placebo32.081.1150.3667.0965.7

[back to top]

Global Evaluation of the Study Medication at 30 and 60 Minutes After Dosing

Global evaluation of the study medication was assessed by the participant on a 5-point scale (1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Very good, 5=Excellent) at 30 and 60 minutes after each dose of study medication during each breakthrough pain episode. A higher score indicates a better evaluation. (NCT00538850)
Timeframe: 30 through 60 minutes after dosing for each pain episode

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
30 minutes60 minutes
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray2.83.1
Placebo2.02.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients That Experienced 1 or More Adverse Events

(NCT00538863)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of the study (up to 116 days)

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray Titration59.0
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray Maintenance80.7

[back to top]

Time to Readiness for Discharge

Each postoperative day, discharge readiness was assessed by an orthopaedic surgeon, a pain nurse, a ward nurse, and a physiotherapist according to the following criteria: no evidence for surgical complications, VAS pain at rest ≤30 mm which is controlled by oral analgesics, ability to eat and drink, ability to walk with elbow crutches, and ability to climb ≥8 stairs. (NCT00562627)
Timeframe: up to 10 days postoperative

Interventiondays (Mean)
LIA IV (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intravenous)4
LIA IA, (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intra-articular)3.5
Epidural5.5

[back to top]

Pain at Rest (VAS)

VAS (pain at rest) 0-100 mm. VAS 0 mm means no pain and VAS 100 mm means maximal pain. (NCT00562627)
Timeframe: 48 hours postoperative

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
LIA IV (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intravenous)18
LIA IA, (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intra-articular)12
Epidural30

[back to top]

Opioid Use

Morphine used by patient controlled analgesia. Amount of used morphine during the first 48 hours after surgery were documented in the CRF by the pain nurses. (NCT00562627)
Timeframe: 48 hours postoperative

Interventionmg (Mean)
LIA IV (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intravenous)77
LIA IA, (Local Infiltration Analgesia, Intra-articular)49
Epidural54

[back to top]

Recording of Instance of Narcotic Side Effects.

Instances of narcotic side effects (vital sign derangement, itching, nausea/vomiting) . (NCT00580489)
Timeframe: Groups were observed a mean of 37 minutes in the Morphine Group and a mean of 43 minutes in the Fentanyl group for side effects.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm C Morphine0
Arm D Fentanyl0

[back to top]

Mean Change in Numeric Pain Score (NPS) From First to Last Dose

"Mean difference in the numeric pain score (NPS) from the first dose to the final dose of medication administered.~A significant mean pain score change is defined as greater than or equal to 2~Numeric Pain Score (NPS) 0-10, 0 Least pain, 10 most pain" (NCT00580489)
Timeframe: Medication was administered over a mean transport time of 37 minutes in the Morphine group and 43 minutes in the Fentanyl group.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Morphine2.2
Fentanyl2.5

[back to top]

Mean Number of Rescue Doses

Rescue dose was defined as the dose of a fast-acting opioid analgesic (except fentanyl preparations) given in case of breakthrough pain or lack of analgesic effect. (NCT00641667)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

InterventionRescue Doses (Mean)
Day 1; (n=66)Day 2; (n=65)Day 3; (n=65)Day 4; (n=64)Day 5; (n=63)Day 6; (n=63)Day 7; (n=63)Day 8; (n=62)Day 9; (n=62)Day 10 or ED; (n=66)
Fentanyl0.20.80.70.70.70.70.80.70.80.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain

Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 4-point categorical scale ranging from 0 to 3 where 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain. (NCT00641667)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1; No pain (n=66)Day 1; Mild pain (n=66)Day 1; Moderate pain (n=66)Day 1; Severe pain (n=66)Day 2; No pain (n=65)Day 2; Mild pain (n=65)Day 2; Moderate pain (n=65)Day 2; Severe pain (n=65)Day 3; No pain (n=65)Day 3; Mild pain (n=65)Day 3; Moderate pain (n=65)Day 3; Severe pain (n=65)Day 4; No pain (n=64)Day 4; Mild pain (n=64)Day 4; Moderate pain (n=64)Day 4; Severe pain (n=64)Day 5; No pain (n=63)Day 5; Mild pain (n=63)Day 5; Moderate pain (n=63)Day 5; Severe pain (n=63)Day 6; No pain (n=63)Day 6; Mild pain (n=63)Day 6; Moderate pain (n=63)Day 6; Severe pain (n=63)Day 7; No pain (n=63)Day 7; Mild pain (n=63)Day 7; Moderate pain (n=63)Day 7; Severe pain (n=63)Day 8; No pain (n=62)Day 8; Mild pain (n=62)Day 8; Moderate pain (n=62)Day 8; Severe pain (n=62)Day 9; No pain (n=62)Day 9; Mild pain (n=62)Day 9; Moderate pain (n=62)Day 9; Severe pain (n=62)Day 10 or ED; No pain (n=66)Day 10 or ED; Mild pain (n=66)Day 10 or ED; Moderate pain(n=66)Day 10 or ED; Severe pain(n=66)
Fentanyl1237170103421014331531634131153612016388114381101338110144071154083

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response Based on Patient's Global Assessment Scale

Participants were asked to assess their satisfaction with respect to the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied. (NCT00641667)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1; Extremely satisfied (n=66)Day 1; Satisfied (n=66)Day 1; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=66)Day 1; Dissatisfied (n=66)Day 1; Extremely dissatisfied (n=66)Day 2; Extremely satisfied (n=65)Day 2; Satisfied (n=65)Day 2; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=65)Day 2; Dissatisfied (n=65)Day 2; Extremely dissatisfied (n=65)Day 3; Extremely satisfied (n=65)Day 3; Satisfied (n=65)Day 3; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=65)Day 3; Dissatisfied (n=65)Day 3; Extremely dissatisfied (n=65)Day 4; Extremely satisfied (n=64)Day 4; Satisfied (n=64)Day 4; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=64)Day 4; Dissatisfied (n=64)Day 4; Extremely dissatisfied (n=64)Day 5; Extremely satisfied (n=63)Day 5; Satisfied (n=63)Day 5; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=63)Day 5; Dissatisfied (n=63)Day 5; Extremely dissatisfied (n=63)Day 6; Extremely satisfied (n=63)Day 6; Satisfied (n=63)Day 6; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=63)Day 6; Dissatisfied (n=63)Day 6; Extremely dissatisfied (n=63)Day 7; Extremely satisfied (n=63)Day 7; Satisfied (n=63)Day 7; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=63)Day 7; Dissatisfied (n=63)Day 7; Extremely dissatisfied (n=63)Day 8; Extremely satisfied (n=62)Day 8; Satisfied (n=62)Day 8; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=62)Day 8; Dissatisfied (n=62)Day 8; Extremely dissatisfied (n=62)Day 9; Extremely satisfied (n=62)Day 9; Satisfied (n=62)Day 9; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=62)Day 9; Dissatisfied (n=62)Day 9; Extremely dissatisfied (n=62)Day 10/ED; Extremely satisfied (n=66)Day 10/ED; Satisfied (n=66)Day 10/ED;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=66)Day 10/ED; Dissatisfied (n=66)Day 10/ED; Extremely dissatisfied (n=66)
Fentanyl835194083124208252570928243010301931931203010311840103019301132172010302060

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale

The treating physician assessed the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug by 2-point scale of effective and ineffective. Number of participants with effective and ineffective therapeutic efficacy with respect to the study drug were reported. (NCT00641667)
Timeframe: Day 10 or ED

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EffectiveIneffective
Fentanyl633

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per Day

The participants assessed total painful time in 1 day on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = less than (<) 4 hours, 1 = greater than or equal to (>=) 4 hours to less than 8 hours, 2 = greater than or equal to 8 hours to less than 12 hours, 3 = greater than or equal to 12 hours and 4 = 24 hours (all day). (NCT00641667)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1; < 4 hours (n=66)Day 1; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=66)Day 1; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=66)Day 1; >= 12 hours (n=66)Day 1; 24 hours (n=66)Day 2; < 4 hours (n=65)Day 2; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=65)Day 2; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=65)Day 2; >= 12 hours (n=65)Day 2; 24 hours (n=65)Day 3; < 4 hours (n=65)Day 3; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=65)Day 3; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=65)Day 3; >= 12 hours (n=65)Day 3; 24 hours (n=65)Day 4; < 4 hours (n=64)Day 4; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=64)Day 4; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=64)Day 4; >= 12 hours (n=64)Day 4; 24 hours (n=64)Day 5; < 4 hours (n=63)Day 5; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=63)Day 5; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=63)Day 5; >= 12 hours (n=63)Day 5; 24 hours (n=63)Day 6; < 4 hours (n=63)Day 6; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=63)Day 6; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=63)Day 6; >= 12 hours (n=63)Day 6; 24 hours (n=63)Day 7; < 4 hours (n=63)Day 7; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=63)Day 7; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=63)Day 7; >= 12 hours (n=63)Day 7; 24 hours (n=63)Day 8; < 4 hours (n=62)Day 8; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=62)Day 8; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=62)Day 8; >= 12 hours (n=62)Day 8; 24 hours (n=62)Day 9; < 4 hours (n=62)Day 9; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=62)Day 9; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=62)Day 9; >= 12 hours (n=62)Day 9; 24 hours (n=62)Day 10 or ED; < 4 hours (n=66)Day 10 or ED; >=4 to < 8 hours (n=66)Day 10 or ED; >=8 to <12 hours (n=66)Day 10 or ED; >= 12 hours (n=66)Day 10 or ED; 24 hours (n=66)
Fentanyl4496074496154169364782254510215466317447417446417476315506325

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

"Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 100-mm VAS with the left edge (0 mm) defined as no pain and the right edge (100 mm) defined as severest pain conceivable." (NCT00641667)
Timeframe: Day 1 (pre-application), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10 or ED

Interventionmm (Mean)
Day 1 pre-application; (n=66)Day 2; (n=65)Day 3; (n=65)Day 4; (n=64)Day 5; (n=63)Day 6; (n=63)Day 7; (n=63)Day 8; (n=62)Day 9; (n=62)Day 10 or ED; (n=66)
Fentanyl15.616.118.615.115.215.314.714.915.115.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Control

Pain control was assessed based on change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and number of daily rescue doses during 3 days before completion of study drug from 3 days before start of study drug. For VAS score, a difference of less than or equal to +15 millimeter (mm) and for rescue doses, a difference of less than or equal to 1 was considered significant to achieve pain control. Pain Intensity VAS ranged from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severest pain conceivable) and rescue dose was defined as dose of fast-acting opioid analgesic (except fentanyl preparations) used for lack of analgesic effect. (NCT00641667)
Timeframe: Day 10 or early discontinuation (ED)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Fentanyl81.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per Day in Double Blind Phase

The participants assessed total painful time in 1 day on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = less than (<) 4 hours, 1 = greater than or equal to (>=) 4 hours to less than 8 hours, 2 = greater than or equal to 8 hours to less than 12 hours, 3 = greater than or equal to 12 hours and 4 = 24 hours (all day). (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ETP; < 4 hours (n=54,60)ETP; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=54,60)ETP; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=54,60)ETP; >= 12 hours (n=54,60)ETP; 24 hours (n=54,60)Day 2; < 4 hours (n=54,60)Day 2; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=54,60)Day 2; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=54,60)Day 2; >= 12 hours (n=54,60)Day 2; 24 hours (n=54,60)Day 3; < 4 hours (n=54,60)Day 3; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=54,60)Day 3; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=54,60)Day 3; >= 12 hours (n=54,60)Day 3; 24 hours (n=54,60)Day 4; < 4 hours (n=54,60)Day 4; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=54,60)Day 4; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=54,60)Day 4; >= 12 hours (n=54,60)Day 4; 24 hours (n=54,60)Day 5; < 4 hours (n=51,60)Day 5; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=51,60)Day 5; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=51,60)Day 5; >= 12 hours (n=51,60)Day 5; 24 hours (n=51,60)Day 6; < 4 hours (n=50,60)Day 6; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=50,60)Day 6; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=50,60)Day 6; >= 12 hours (n=50,60)Day 6; 24 hours (n=50,60)Day 7; < 4 hours (n=50,59)Day 7; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=50,59)Day 7; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=50,59)Day 7; >= 12 hours (n=50,59)Day 7; 24 hours (n=50,59)Day 8; < 4 hours (n=50,59)Day 8; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=50,59)Day 8; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=50,59)Day 8; >= 12 hours (n=50,59)Day 8; 24 hours (n=50,59)Day 9; < 4 hours (n=49,56)Day 9; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=49,56)Day 9; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=49,56)Day 9; >= 12 hours (n=49,56)Day 9; 24 hours (n=49,56)Day 10 or ED; < 4 hours (n=54,60)Day 10 or ED; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=54,60)Day 10 or ED; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=54,60)Day 10 or ED; >= 12 hours (n=54,60)Day 10 or ED; 24 hours (n=54,60)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)445221406431425421397413377322358241369221387410377410425610
Fentanyl 3-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)4657114837114665124310331458421486321466232464441447221466251

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Total Duration of Pain Per Day in Titration Phase

The participants assessed total painful time in 1 day on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0 = less than (<) 4 hours, 1 = greater than or equal to (>=) 4 hours to less than 8 hours, 2 = greater than or equal to 8 hours to less than 12 hours, 3 = greater than or equal to 12 hours and 4 = 24 hours (all day). (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1 PA; < 4 hours (n=155)Day 1 PA; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=155)Day 1 PA; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=155)Day 1 PA; >= 12 hours (n=155)Day 1 PA; 24 hours (n=155)Day 2; < 4 hours (n=155)Day 2; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=155)Day 2; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=155)Day 2; >= 12 hours (n=155)Day 2; 24 hours (n=155)Day 3; < 4 hours (n=153)Day 3; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=153)Day 3; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=153)Day 3; >= 12 hours (n=153)Day 3; 24 hours (n=153)Day 4; < 4 hours (n=152)Day 4; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=152)Day 4; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=152)Day 4; >= 12 hours (n=152)Day 4; 24 hours (n=152)Day 5; < 4 hours (n=151)Day 5; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=151)Day 5; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=151)Day 5; >= 12 hours (n=151)Day 5; 24 hours (n=151)Day 6; < 4 hours (n=129)Day 6; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=129)Day 6; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=129)Day 6; >= 12 hours (n=129)Day 6; 24 hours (n=129)Day 7; < 4 hours (n=112)Day 7; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=112)Day 7; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=112)Day 7; >= 12 hours (n=112)Day 7; 24 hours (n=112)Day 8; < 4 hours (n=98)Day 8; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=98)Day 8; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=98)Day 8; >= 12 hours (n=98)Day 8; 24 hours (n=98)Day 9; < 4 hours (n=74)Day 9; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=74)Day 9; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=74)Day 9; >= 12 hours (n=74)Day 9; 24 hours (n=74)Day 10; < 4 hours (n=57)Day 10; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=57)Day 10; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=57)Day 10; >= 12 hours (n=57)Day 10; 24 hours (n=57)Day 11; < 4 hours (n=51)Day 11; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=51)Day 11; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=51)Day 11; >= 12 hours (n=51)Day 11; 24 hours (n=51)Day 12; < 4 hours (n=38)Day 12; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=38)Day 12; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=38)Day 12; >= 12 hours (n=38)Day 12; 24 hours (n=38)Day 13; < 4 hours (n=29)Day 13; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=29)Day 13; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=29)Day 13; >= 12 hours (n=29)Day 13; 24 hours (n=29)Day 14 or ED; < 4 hours (n=155)Day 14 or ED; >= 4 to < 8 hours (n=155)Day 14 or ED; >= 8 to < 12 hours (n=155)Day 14 or ED; >= 12 hours (n=155)Day 14 or ED; 24 hours (n=155)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Titration Phase)36382224355231301725633226122081261913138624151412722013121266181279551812674412648319548352815252722173432107161598

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score in Double Blind Phase

"Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 100-mm VAS with the left edge (0 mm) defined as no pain and the right edge (100 mm) defined as severest pain conceivable." (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
ETP; (n=54,60)Day 2; (n=54,60)Day 3; (n=54,60)Day 4; (n=54,60)Day 5; (n=51,60)Day 6; (n=50,60)Day 7; (n=50,59)Day 8; (n=50,59)Day 9; (n=49,56)Day 10 or ED; (n=54,60)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)16.518.221.517.216.818.116.317.517.016.1
Fentanyl 3-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)18.618.417.818.517.719.218.017.217.218.8

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score in Titration Phase

"Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 100-mm VAS with the left edge (0 mm) defined as no pain and the right edge (100 mm) defined as severest pain conceivable." (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED

Interventionmm (Mean)
Day 1 PA (n=155)Day 2 (n=155)Day 3 (n=153)Day 4 (n=152)Day 5 (n=151)Day 6 (n=129)Day 7 (n=111)Day 8 (n=98)Day 9 (n=74)Day 10 (n=57)Day 11 (n=51)Day 12 (n=38)Day 13 (n=29)Day 14 or ED (n=155)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Titration Phase)56.845.041.935.732.732.830.529.229.028.525.827.427.523.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain in Titration Phase

Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 4-point categorical scale ranging from 0 to 3 where 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1 PA; No pain (n=155)Day 1 PA; Mild pain (n=155)Day 1 PA; moderate Pain (n=155)Day 1 PA; severe Pain (n=155)Day 2; No pain (n=155)Day 2; Mild pain (n=155)Day 2; Moderate pain (n=155)Day 2; Severe pain (n=155)Day 3; No pain (n=153)Day 3; Mild pain (n=153)Day 3; Moderate pain (n=153)Day 3; Severe pain (n=153)Day 4; No pain (n=152)Day 4; Mild pain (n=152)Day 4; Moderate pain (n=152)Day 4; Severe pain (n=152)Day 5; No pain (n=151)Day 5; Mild pain (n=151)Day 5; Moderate pain (n=151)Day 5; Severe pain (n=151)Day 6; No pain (n=129)Day 6; Mild pain (n=129)Day 6; Moderate pain (n=129)Day 6; Severe pain (n=129)Day 7; No pain (n=112)Day 7; Mild pain (n=112)Day 7; Moderate pain (n=112)Day 7; Severe pain (n=112)Day 8; No pain (n=98)Day 8; Mild pain (n=98)Day 8; Moderate pain (n=98)Day 8; Severe pain (n=98)Day 9; No pain (n=74)Day 9; Mild pain (n=74)Day 9; Moderate pain (n=74)Day 9; Severe pain (n=74)Day 10; No pain (n=57)Day 10; Mild pain (n=57)Day 10; Moderate pain (n=57)Day 10; Severe pain (n=57)Day 11; No pain (n=51)Day 11; Mild pain (n=51)Day 11; Moderate pain (n=51)Day 11; Severe pain (n=51)Day 12; No pain (n=38)Day 12; Mild pain (n=38)Day 12; Moderate pain (n=38)Day 12; Severe pain (n=38)Day 13; No pain (n=29)Day 13; Mild pain (n=29)Day 13; Moderate pain (n=29)Day 13; Severe pain (n=29)Day 14 or ED; No pain (n=155)Day 14 or ED; Mild pain (n=155)Day 14 or ED; Moderate pain(n=155)Day 14 or ED; Severe pain(n=155)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Titration Phase)02311517454934136469712687021580506136944311623639562857452203312305271815211112151202092385

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Dose Titration Success

Participants achieving dose titration success included all participants who had a mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of less than or equal to 34 millimeter (mm) and received not more than 2 rescue doses during the last 3 days before the completion or discontinuation of dose titration phase. Pain Intensity VAS measured severity of pain on a 100 mm scale ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severest pain conceivable) and rescue dose was defined as dose of a fast-acting oral morphine hydrochloride solution or morphine in water solution used in the case of breakthrough pain. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 14 or early discontinuation (ED)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Titration Phase)80.60

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Pain Control in Double Blind Phase

Pain control was assessed based on change in VAS and number of daily rescue doses during 3 days before completion of Double Blind Phase from 3 days before start of Double Blind Phase. For VAS score, difference of less than or equal to +15 mm and for rescue doses, difference of less than or equal to 1 was considered significant to achieve pain control. Pain Intensity VAS measured pain severity on a scale ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severest pain conceivable) and rescue dose was defined as dose of fast-acting oral morphine formulation used in case of breakthrough pain. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 10 or ED

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)83.3
Fentanyl 3-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)90.0

[back to top]

Change From Dose Titration Phase in the Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Double Blind Phase

The mean VAS score for the last 3 days before the completion or discontinuation of Double Blind Phase was compared with that for the last 3 days before the completion or discontinuation of Dose Titration Phase and the change from Dose Titration Phase in the mean VAS Score at Double Blind Phase was reported. Pain Intensity VAS measured severity of pain on a 100 mm scale ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (severest pain conceivable). (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Dose Titration Phase (Day 12 to Day 14) and Double Blind Phase (Day 8 to Day 10)

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Dose Titration Phase (Day 12 to Day 14)Change at Double Blind Phase (Day 8 to Day 10)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)18.4-1.1
Fentanyl 3-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)20.6-2.5

[back to top]

Mean Number of Rescue Doses in Double Blind Phase

Rescue dose was defined as dose of a fast-acting oral morphine hydrochloride solution or morphine in water solution used in the case of breakthrough pain or lack of analgesic effect. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED

,
InterventionRescue doses (Mean)
Day 1; (n=54,60)Day 2; (54,60)Day 3; (54,60)Day 4; (54,60)Day 5; (52,60)Day 6; (50,60)Day 7; (50,59)Day 8; (50,59)Day 9; (49,56)Day 10 or ED; (54,60)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)0.10.30.30.40.30.30.30.50.50.2
Fentanyl 3-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)0.20.40.40.40.50.60.50.50.50.4

[back to top]

Mean Number of Rescue Doses in Titration Phase

Rescue dose was defined as dose of a fast-acting oral morphine hydrochloride solution or morphine in water solution used in the case of breakthrough pain or lack of analgesic effect. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 1 PA, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED

InterventionRescue doses (Mean)
Day 1 PA; (n=155)Day 2; (n=155)Day 3; (n=153)Day 4; (n=152)Day 5; (n=151)Day 6; (n=129)Day 7; (n=112)Day 8; (n=99)Day 9; (n=74)Day 10; (n=57)Day 11; (n=51)Day 12; (n=38)Day 13; (n=29)Day 14 or ED; (n=155)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Titration Phase)0.30.80.70.60.50.70.50.50.40.40.40.50.30.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pain Intensity Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain in Double Blind Phase

Participants were asked to assess their resting pain intensity (severity of pain) on a 4-point categorical scale ranging from 0 to 3 where 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ETP; No pain (n=54,60)ETP; MIld pain (n=54,60)ETP; Moderate pain (n=54,60)ETP; Severe pain (n=54,60)Day 2; No pain (n=54,60)Day 2; Mild pain (n=54,60)Day 2; Moderate pain (n=54,60)Day 2; Severe pain (n=54,60)Day 3; No pain (n=54,60)Day 3; Mild pain (n=54,60)Day 3; Moderate pain (n=54,60)Day 3; Severe pain (n=54,60)Day 4; No pain (n=54,60)Day 4; Mild pain (n=54,60)Day 4; Moderate pain (n=54,60)Day 4; Severe pain (n=54,60)Day 5; No pain (n=51,60)Day 5; Mild pain (n=51,60)Day 5; Moderate pain (n=51,60)Day 5; Severe pain (n=51,60)Day 6; No pain (n=50,60)Day 6; Mild pain (n=50,60)Day 6; Moderate pain (n=50,60)Day 6; Severe pain (n=50,60)Day 7; No pain (n=50,59)Day 7; Mild pain (n=50,59)Day 7; Moderate pain (n=50,59)Day 7; Severe pain (n=50,59)Day 8; No pain (n=50,59)Day 8; Mild pain (n=50,59)Day 8; Moderate pain (n=50,59)Day 8; Severe pain (n=50,59)Day 9; No pain (n=49,56)Day 9; Mild pain (n=49,56)Day 9; Moderate pain (n=49,56)Day 9; Severe pain (n=49,56)Day 10 or ED; No pain (n=54,60)Day 10 or ED; Mild pain (n=54,60)Day 10 or ED; Moderate pain (n=54,60)Day 10 or ED; Severe pain (n=54,60)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)6399010301409349283610083111110308283381102911013231211229121
Fentanyl 3-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)103712194011012398112417011427011341411134122103613010331301130181

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response Based on Participant's Global Assessment Scale in Double Blind Phase

Participants were asked to assess their satisfaction with respect to the therapeutic efficacy of the study drug to control pain on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 14-End of Titration Phase (ETP), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9 and Day 10 or ED

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ETP; Extremely satisfied (n=54,60)ETP; Satisfied (n=54,60)ETP;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=54,60)ETP; Dissatisfied (n=54,60)Day 2; Extremely satisfied (n=54,60)Day 2; Satisfied (n=54,60)Day 2;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=54,60)Day 2; Dissatisfied (n=54,60)Day 3; Extremely satisfied (n=54,60)Day 3; Satisfied (n=54,60)Day 3;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=54,60)Day 3; Dissatisfied (n=54,60)Day 4; Extremely satisfied (n=54,60)Day 4; Satisfied (n=54,60)Day 4;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=54,60)Day 4; Dissatisfied (n=54,60)Day 5; Extremely satisfied (n=51,60)Day 5; Satisfied (n=51,60)Day 5;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=51,60)Day 5; Dissatisfied (n=51,60)Day 6; Extremely satisfied (n=50,60)Day 6; Satisfied (n=50,60)Day 6;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=50,60)Day 6; Dissatisfied (n=50,60)Day 7; Extremely satisfied (n=50,59)Day 7; Satisfied (n=50,59)Day 7;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=50,59)Day 7; Dissatisfied (n=50,59)Day 8; Extremely satisfied (n=50,59)Day 8; Satisfied (n=50,59)Day 8;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=50,59)Day 8; Dissatisfied (n=50,59)Day 9; Extremely satisfied (n=49,56)Day 9; Satisfied (n=49,56)Day 9;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=49,56)Day 9; Dissatisfied (n=49,56)Day 10/ED; Extremely satisfied (n=54,60)Day 10/ED; Satisfied (n=54,60)Day10/EDNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied;n=54,60Day 10/ED; Dissatisfied (n=54,60)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)331191333162332163331173528171625172527180525191622210629181
Fentanyl 3-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)437163438162439125533193436164634155435146431177825167333177

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response Based on Participant's Global Assessment Scale in Titration Phase

Participants were asked to assess their satisfaction with respect to the therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug to control pain on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 = extremely satisfied, 2 = satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = dissatisfied and 5 = extremely dissatisfied. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 1 pre-application (PA), Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6, Day 7, Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 13 and Day 14 or ED

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1 PA; Extremely satisfied (n=155)Day 1 PA; Satisfied (n=155)Day1 PA;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=155)Day 1 PA; Dissatisfied (n=155)Day 1 PA; Extremely dissatisfied (n=155)Day 2; Extremely satisfied (n=155)Day 2; Satisfied (n=155)Day 2; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=155)Day 2; Dissatisfied (n=155)Day 2; Extremely dissatisfied (n=155)Day 3; Extremely satisfied (n=153)Day 3; Satisfied (n=153)Day 3; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=153)Day 3; Dissatisfied (n=153)Day 3; Extremely dissatisfied (n=153)Day 4; Extremely satisfied (n=152)Day 4; Satisfied (n=152)Day 4; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=152)Day 4; Dissatisfied (n=152)Day 4; Extremely dissatisfied (n=152)Day 5; Extremely satisfied (n=151)Day 5; Satisfied (n=151)Day 5; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=151)Day 5; Dissatisfied (n=151)Day 5; Extremely dissatisfied (n=151)Day 6; Extremely satisfied (n=129)Day 6; Dissatisfied (n=129)Day 6; Extremely dissatisfied (n=129)Day 6; Satisfied (n=129)Day 6; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=129)Day 7; Extremely satisfied (n=112)Day 7; Satisfied (n=112)Day 7; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=112)Day 7; Dissatisfied (n=112)Day 7; Extremely dissatisfied (n=112)Day 8; Extremely satisfied (n=98)Day 8; Satisfied (n=98)Day 8; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=98)Day 8; Dissatisfied (n=98)Day 8; Extremely dissatisfied (n=98)Day 9; Extremely satisfied (n=74)Day 9; Satisfied (n=74)Day 9; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=74)Day 9; Dissatisfied (n=74)Day 9; Extremely dissatisfied (n=74)Day 10; Extremely satisfied (n=57)Day 10; Satisfied (n=57)Day 10; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=57)Day 10; Dissatisfied (n=57)Day 10; Extremely dissatisfied (n=57)Day 11; Extremely satisfied (n=51)Day 11; Satisfied (n=51)Day 11; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=51)Day 11; Dissatisfied (n=51)Day 11; Extremely dissatisfied (n=51)Day 12; Extremely satisfied (n=38)Day 12; Satisfied (n=38)Day 12; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=38)Day 12; Dissatisfied (n=38)Day 12; Extremely dissatisfied (n=38)Day 13; Extremely satisfied (n=29)Day 13; Satisfied (n=29)Day 13; Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (n=29)Day 13; Dissatisfied (n=29)Day 13; Extremely dissatisfied (n=29)Day 14/ED; Extremely satisfied (n=155)Day 14/ED; Satisfied (n=155)Day14/ED;Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied(n=155)Day 14/ED; Dissatisfied (n=155)Day 14/ED; Extremely dissatisfied (n=155)
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Titration Phase)19548384327939115070311355692414635924145451191550431403483890136334002923501232160120152001892098253110

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale in Double Blind Phase

The treating physician assessed the therapeutic efficacy of the study drug to control pain on a 2-point scale of effective and ineffective. Number of participants with effective and ineffective therapeutic efficacy with respect to the study drug were reported. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 10

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
EffectiveIneffective
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)531
Fentanyl 3-day Transdermal Patch (Double Blind Phase)580

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response Based on Physician's Global Assessment Scale in Titration Phase

The treating physician assessed the therapeutic efficacy of the study drug to control pain on a 2-point scale of effective and ineffective. Number of participants with effective and ineffective therapeutic efficacy with respect to the study drug were reported. (NCT00644787)
Timeframe: Day 14

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EffectiveIneffective
Fentanyl 1-day Transdermal Patch (Titration Phase)1459

[back to top]

Volume of Steady State Distribution (Vss)

Volume of steady state distribution (Vss) for Dexmedetomidine (NCT00652028)
Timeframe: ≤30 min prior to start of loading dose (LD); 5 min before finishing LD; 0.5,1,2 & 4-6 hrs after start of maintenance infusion (MI); 30 min prior to end of MI (within 24 hrs of start of MI); 10 min after end of MI and 0.5,1,2,4 & 10 hrs after end of MI.

InterventionLitre (Mean)
Dose Level 156.808
Dose Level 235.246
Dose Level 332.789
Dose Level 443.652

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2)

Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) for Dexmedetomidine (NCT00652028)
Timeframe: ≤30 min prior to start of loading dose (LD); 5 min before finishing LD; 0.5,1,2 & 4-6 hrs after start of maintenance infusion (MI); 30 min prior to end of MI (within 24 hrs of start of MI); 10 min after end of MI and 0.5,1,2,4 & 10 hrs after end of MI.

Interventionhour (Mean)
Dose Level 11.546
Dose Level 21.743
Dose Level 32.045
Dose Level 42.145

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Css)

Plasma concentration at steady state (Css) for Dexmedetomidine (NCT00652028)
Timeframe: ≤30 min prior to start of loading dose (LD); 5 min before finishing LD; 0.5,1,2 & 4-6 hrs after start of maintenance infusion (MI); 30 min prior to end of MI (within 24 hrs of start of MI); 10 min after end of MI and 0.5,1,2,4 & 10 hrs after end of MI.

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (Mean)
Dose Level 1402.026
Dose Level 2539.848
Dose Level 31347.284
Dose Level 42827.144

[back to top]

Observed Peak Plasma Concentration

Observed peak plasma concentration (Cmax) for Dexmedetomidine (NCT00652028)
Timeframe: ≤30 min prior to start of the loading dose (LD); 5 min before finishing the LD; 0.5,1,2&4 to 6 hrs after start of maintenance infusion (MI); 30 min prior to end of MI (24 hrs of start of MI); 10 min after end of MI and 0.5,1,2,4&10 hrs after end of MI.

Interventionpicograms per milliliter (Mean)
Dose Level 1480.437
Dose Level 2847.691
Dose Level 33385.569
Dose Level 43090.939

[back to top]

Level of Sedation Based on Average Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) Score

"RSS Score range from 1 to 6:~Patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both.~Patient is cooperative, orientated and tranquil.~Patient responds to command only.~Patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar (between the eyebrows) tap or loud auditory stimulus.~Patient exhibits a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus.~Patient exhibits no response to stimulus." (NCT00652028)
Timeframe: Prior to loading (Baseline), 5 and 10 min during the load, at start of maintenance infusion and every 15 min for 1 hour, hourly during the maintenance period, before and within 5 min after midazolam or fentanyl dose during the dexmedetomidine infusion.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dose Level 12.4
Dose Level 22.8
Dose Level 32.4
Dose Level 44.0

[back to top]

Clearance (CL)

Clearance (CL) for Dexmedetomidine (NCT00652028)
Timeframe: ≤30 min prior to start of loading dose (LD); 5 min before finishing LD; 0.5,1,2 & 4-6 hrs after start of maintenance infusion (MI); 30 min prior to end of MI (within 24 hrs of start of MI); 10 min after end of MI and 0.5,1,2,4 & 10 hrs after end of MI.

InterventionLitre/hour (Mean)
Dose Level 132.208
Dose Level 220.268
Dose Level 318.565
Dose Level 422.199

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUC0-t)

Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) for Dexmedetomidine (NCT00652028)
Timeframe: ≤30 min prior to start of loading dose (LD); 5 min before finishing LD; 0.5,1,2 & 4-6 hrs after start of maintenance infusion (MI); 30 min prior to end of MI (within 24 hrs of start of MI); 10 min after end of MI and 0.5,1,2,4 & 10 hrs after end of MI.

Interventionpicograms*hr/mL (Mean)
Dose Level 12681.332
Dose Level 26460.576
Dose Level 316992.540
Dose Level 428531.864

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time Infinity (AUC0-∞)

Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time infinity (AUC0-∞) for Dexmedetomidine (NCT00652028)
Timeframe: ≤30 min prior to start of the loading dose (LD); 5 min before finishing the LD; 0.5,1,2&4 to 6 hrs after start of maintenance infusion (MI); 30 min prior to end of MI (24 hrs of start of MI); 10 min after end of MI and 0.5,1,2,4&10 hrs after end of MI.

Interventionpicograms*hr/mL (Mean)
Dose Level 13153.518
Dose Level 26673.163
Dose Level 317300.539
Dose Level 428970.541

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Received Rescue Medication for Sedation (Midazolam) and Analgesics (Fentanyl)

Number of subjects who received rescue medication for Sedation (Midazolam) and analgesics (Fentanyl) while intubated during Treatment Period (NCT00652028)
Timeframe: During the treatment period (Approximately 24 hours)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MidazolamFentanyl
Dose Level 1712
Dose Level 2710
Dose Level 3513
Dose Level 438

[back to top]

Incidence of Pain

Pain greater than a zero reported in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (NCT00654329)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dexmedetomidine 1microgram/Kilogram6
Dexmedetomidine 2 Micrograms/Kilogram11
Fentanyl 2 Micrograms/Kilogram7
Normal Saline Placebo18

[back to top]

Length of Stay in PACU

Total time from PACU entry until discharge (NCT00654329)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine 1microgram/Kilogram48
Dexmedetomidine 2 Micrograms/Kilogram88
Fentanyl 2 Micrograms/Kilogram46
Normal Saline Placebo48

[back to top]

Morphine Rescue

Total morphine administered in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (NCT00654511)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

Interventionmicrograms/kilogram (Mean)
Fentanyl 1 Microgram/Kilogram Intravenous (IV)84
Fentanyl 2 Micrograms/Kilogram Intravenous (IV)95
Dexmedetomidine 2 Microgram/Kilogram Intravenous (IV)85
Dexmedetomidine 4 Micrograms/Kilogram Intravenous (IV)59

[back to top]

Time to First Morphine Dose

Total minutes from study medication administration to time of first morphine dose. (NCT00654511)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Fentanyl 1 Microgram/Kilogram IV19
Fentanyl 2 Micrograms/Kilogram IV43.7
Dexmedetomidine 2 Microgram/Kilogram IV61.1
Dexmedetomidine 4 Micrograms/Kilogram IV137.6

[back to top]

Time to Analgesia

Time it took for subjects to achieve a pain score reduction of 2 units (on a 0 to 10 scale) (NCT00685295)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionminutes (Median)
Arm 1 / Fentora10
Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid35

[back to top]

Pain Reduction

Number of subjects who reached pain reduction. A subject was deemed to have reached pain reduction if there was a two-point drop in pain scale (0-10). (NCT00685295)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 / Fentora30
Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid24

[back to top]

Occurrence of Untoward Opioid Side Effects

Subjects were monitored for any signs of untoward opioid side effects. (NCT00685295)
Timeframe: 120 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm 1 / Fentora0
Arm 2 / Percocet/Prevacid1

[back to top]

Efficacy Was Not Measured in This Study. The Number of Deaths in the Long Term Follow-up Will be Reported.

Efficacy was not measured in this study as the intention was to evaluate long term safety in this population. The number of deaths in the long term follow-up will be reported. (NCT00696137)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BEMA Fentanyl0

[back to top]

Physician's Final Assessment of the Efficacy of Therapy With Matrifen®

Assessment on a scale: Excellent, good, satisfactory, dissatisfactory (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: After 4 week therapy with Matrifen®

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryDissatisfactoryMissing data
Matrifen®253022733657367

[back to top]

Physician's Assessment of the Skin Tolerability of the Fentanyl-patches

Assessment on a scale: Excellent, good, satisfactory, dissatisfactory (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: After 4 week therapy with Matrifen®

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryDissatisfactoryMissing data
Matrifen®34031716821889

[back to top]

Physician's Assessment of the Adhesion Properties of the Fentanyl-patches

Assessment on a scale: Excellent, good, satisfactory, dissatisfactory (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: After 4 week therapy with Matrifen®

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryDissatisfactoryMissing data
Matrifen®327417771623560

[back to top]

Patient's Assessment of the Acceptance of the Fentanyl-patches

Assessment on a scale: Excellent, good, satisfactory, dissatisfactory (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: After 4 week therapy with Matrifen®

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryDissatisfactoryMissing data
Matrifen®32101725168101104

[back to top]

Physician's Final Assessment of the Tolerability of Matrifen®

Assessment on a scale: Excellent, good, satisfactory, dissatisfactory (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: After 4 week therapy with Matrifen®

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ExcellentGoodSatisfactoryDissatisfactoryMissing data
Matrifen®2866205816175148

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Anxiety / Depression

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I am not anxious or depressed~I am moderately anxious or depressed~I am extremely anxious or depressed" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
I am not anxious or depressedI am moderately anxious or depressedI am extremely anxious or depressed
Matrifen® / Final Visit19201409106
Matrifen® / Initial Visit6881949798

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Self Care

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I have no problems with self-care~I have some problems washing or dressing myself~I am unable to wash or dress myself" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
I have no problems with self-careI have some problems washing or dressing myselfI am unable to wash or dress myself
Matrifen® / Final Visit17091461265
Matrifen® / Initial Visit6822152601

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Mobility

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I have no problems in walking around~I have some problems in walking around~I am confined to bed" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
I have no problems in walking aroundI have some problems in walking aroundI am confined to bed
Matrifen® / Final Visit12941923218
Matrifen® / Initial Visit2842779372

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Usual Activities

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I have no problems with performing my usual activities~I have some problems with performing my usual activities~I am unable to perform my usual activities" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Matrifen® / Initial Visit2.27
Matrifen® / Final Visit1.80

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Self Care

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I have no problems with self-care~I have some problems washing or dressing myself~I am unable to wash or dress myself" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Matrifen® / Initial Visit1.98
Matrifen® / Final Visit1.58

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Mobility

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I have no problems in walking around~I have some problems in walking around~I am confined to bed" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Matrifen® / Initial Visit2.03
Matrifen® / Final Visit1.69

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Anxiety / Depression

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I am not anxious or depressed~I am moderately anxious or depressed~I am extremely anxious or depressed" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Matrifen® / Initial Visit2.03
Matrifen® / Final Visit1.47

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Visual Analogue Scale

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 =worst imaginable health status, 100 =best imaginable health status (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Initial visitFinal visit
Matrifen®40.158.8

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Pain / Discomfort

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I have no pain or discomfort~I have moderate pain or discomfort~I have extreme pain or discomfort" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
I have no pain or discomfortI have moderate pain or discomfortI have extreme pain or discomfort
Matrifen® / Final Visit7492503183
Matrifen® / Initial Visit1811042313

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): European Index Score

Index derived from the five EQ-5D-items (= mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) resulting in a value from -1= very ill to 1=full health (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Initial visitFinal visit
Matrifen®0.0780.584

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Domain Usual Activities

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I have no problems with performing my usual activities~I have some problems with performing my usual activities~I am unable to perform my usual activities" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
I have no problems with performing my usual activiI have some problems with performing my usual actiI am unable to perform my usual activities
Matrifen® / Final Visit10701973392
Matrifen® / Initial Visit14222271066

[back to top]

EQ-5D (Optional): Pain / Discomfort

"This outcome measure to assess patients quality of life is based on an optional standardised patient questionnaire (EQ-5D).~Questions on a scale from 1-3 at initial and final visit:~I have no pain or discomfort~I have moderate pain or discomfort~I have extreme pain or discomfort" (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Matrifen® / Initial Visit2.67
Matrifen® / Final Visit1.84

[back to top]

Patient's Assessment of Pain Severity Score

Assessment on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0=No pain to 10=Most severe pain (NCT00699335)
Timeframe: Before and after therapy with Matrifen® (4 weeks)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Start of therapyEnd of study
Matrifen®7.123.32

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Pain intensity NRS measured pain intensity experienced by the participant on a scale, 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 mean the worst possible pain. Participant's pain intensity was assessed by asking following question to the participant: on a scale 0 to 10 where 0 means no pain, and 10 means the worst possible pain, rate the pain that you have now. (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, study treatment discontinuation or withdrawal, and when participant was fit for discharge (FFD) (assessed up to 91 hours)

,
InterventionUnit on Scale (Mean)
Baseline (n = 58, 49)Hour 1 (n = 58, 48)Hour 2 (n = 57, 49)Hour 3 (n = 57, 48)Hour 4 (n = 57, 47)Hour 5 (n = 58, 46)Hour 6 (n = 55, 46)Hour 8 (n = 54, 44)Hour 12 (n = 48, 40)Hour 24 (n = 52, 34)Hour 48 (n = 13, 6)Hour 72 (n = 3, 2)Study discontinuation or withdrawal (n = 53, 50)FFD (n = 44, 38)
Fentanyl IONSYS1.21.62.22.72.93.13.13.02.51.50.60.71.80.6
Morphine IV PCA1.31.52.12.22.92.52.52.31.81.91.50.51.61.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Method of Pain Control

"The assessment consist of a categorical evaluation (poor, fair, good or excellent) of the method of pain control by asking following question from the participant: Overall, would you rate this PCA (participant controlled analgesia) method of pain control as being poor, fair, good, or excellent?" (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: Hour 72 or early study withdrawal

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
PoorFairGoodExcellent
Fentanyl IONSYS512131
Morphine IV PCA162319

[back to top]

Number of Participants Facing Technical Failure of the Device

Technical failure was defined as malfunctioning or failure of device to work appropriately. (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study treatment (Hour 72)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Fentanyl IONSYS1
Morphine IV PCA1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Require Concomitant Non-opioid Analgesics

Non-opioid analgesics are non morphine like medications used to get relieve from pain. (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study treatment (Hour 72)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
ParacetamolNSAID's
Fentanyl IONSYS3931
Morphine IV PCA2820

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Require Concomitant Antiemetic Medication

Antiemetic medicines are the drugs which prevent vomiting. (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study treatment (Hour 72)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
DexamethasoneCyclizineMetoclopramideDomperidoneOndansetronGranisetronMentha X Piperita
Fentanyl IONSYS119011120
Morphine IV PCA020301221

[back to top]

Time to Fit For Discharge (FFD)

"Participants were assessed for fulfilling the following FFD criteria: 1- Retaining fluids and food; 2- Passing urine without the aid of a catheter; 3- Bowel sounds and/or opening; 4- Cardiovascular stability; 5- Respiratory stability; 6- No post-operative wound complications; 7- Pain adequately controlled with oral analgesia only; 8- Adequately mobile according to locally acceptable standards for mobility for surgery type and pre-operative expectations. The FFD criteria were answered on a Yes or No basis. When all criteria were answered as Yes, participant was considered to be FFD." (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: When participant was FFD (assessed up to 91 hours)

InterventionHours (Median)
Fentanyl IONSYS70.08
Morphine IV PCA71.21

[back to top]

Time to Actual Discharge

The time from baseline to the time at which the participant was actually discharged from ward care was recorded as time to actual discharge. (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: When participant was actually discharged from ward care (assessed up to 258.5 hours)

InterventionHours (Median)
Fentanyl IONSYS91.44
Morphine IV PCA94.61

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Require Rescue Medication

Rescue medication was defined as a fast-acting medication given besides the study drug that could alleviate pain quickly, but the effects were not long lasting. Morphine was given intravenously as rescue medication for all participants randomly assigned to either treatment group. (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Hour 3

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Fentanyl IONSYS10
Morphine IV PCA2

[back to top]

Participant's Evaluation of Mean Ability to Mobilize After Surgery

"The ability to mobilize was assessed through a combined analysis of participant's responses to the following 3 questions: 1-Because of the system/device, I had to be careful when I used my hands; 2-The system/device made it difficult for me to adjust my position in bed; 3-The system/device interfered with my ability to get out of bed and walk around. All 3 items were scored on a 6-point Likert scale, ranging from not at all (score 0) to a very great deal (score 5). Total ability to mobilize was assessed as average of 3 scores which range from 0 (best mobility) to 5 (worst mobility)." (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: Hour 72 or early study withdrawal

InterventionUnits on scale (Mean)
Fentanyl IONSYS0.02
Morphine IV PCA2.26

[back to top]

Nurse Ease of Care (EOC) Questionnaire Score

Nurse EOC questionnaire had 22 items and covered 3 aspects of care delivery associated with acute care pain management systems: time, bothersome and satisfaction. Items were scored on a 6-point Likert scale, ranging from 'not at all' (Score 0) to 'a very great deal' (score 5). The total score was calculated as the mean of the non-missing items for all the questions. (NCT00766506)
Timeframe: When participant was fit for discharge (FFD) (assessed up to 91 hours)

InterventionUnits on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl IONSYS0.28
Morphine IV PCA0.80

[back to top]

Bromage Score

the incidence of decreased motor block (Bromage score) documented until delivery. Bromage is defined as 0-freely able to move extremities (no motor block) up to 3-unable to move legs or feet (complete motor block) (NCT00779467)
Timeframe: until delivery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine With Neostimgine 8 mcg/ml0.7
Bupivacaine and Neostigmine 4 mcg/ml1.1
Bupivacaine With Neostigmine 2 mcg/ml1.0
BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL 2 MCG/ML0.9

[back to top]

Amount of Drug Consumed Per Hour in Each Group(Arm)

Median hourly total bupivacaine consumption. Drug amount consumed per hour of each group (arm) (NCT00779467)
Timeframe: until delivery

Interventionmilliliters per hour (Median)
Bupivacaine With Neostimgine 8 mcg/ml16.2
Bupivacaine and Neostigmine 4 mcg/ml14.6
Bupivacaine With Neostigmine 2 mcg/ml15.3
BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL 2 MCG/ML16

[back to top]

Pruritus

the occurrence of pruritis (itching) throughout the labor analgesia infusion--the presence of itching rated on a scale of 0-no itching at all up to a maximum of 10- severe itching. (NCT00779467)
Timeframe: until delivery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine With Neostimgine 8 mcg/ml0.05
Bupivacaine and Neostigmine 4 mcg/ml0.03
Bupivacaine With Neostigmine 2 mcg/ml0.03
BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL 2 MCG/ML0.9

[back to top]

Shivering

maternal occurrence of shivering--Shivering scored on a 0-no shivering at all up to maximum of 10-shivering uncontrollably (NCT00779467)
Timeframe: until delivery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine With Neostimgine 8 mcg/ml0.2
Bupivacaine and Neostigmine 4 mcg/ml0.3
Bupivacaine With Neostigmine 2 mcg/ml0.3
BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL 2 MCG/ML0.2

[back to top]

Sedation

average maternal sedation score measured on a 0-not sleepy at all up to a maximum of 10-extremely sleepy (NCT00779467)
Timeframe: until delivery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine With Neostimgine 8 mcg/ml3.3
Bupivacaine and Neostigmine 4 mcg/ml3.4
Bupivacaine With Neostigmine 2 mcg/ml3.3
BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL 2 MCG/ML4.1

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction Scores

maternal reported satisfaction scores of labor analgesia on a scale of 1-5, with 1-not satisfied at all up to 5 -completely satisfied with labor analgesia (NCT00779467)
Timeframe: within 24 hours post delivery

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Bupivacaine With Neostimgine 8 mcg/ml4.5
Bupivacaine and Neostigmine 4 mcg/ml4.0
Bupivacaine With Neostigmine 2 mcg/ml4.0
BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL 2 MCG/ML4.0

[back to top]

Nausea

average maximum nausea score in each group--maternal nausea scored on a 0-no nausea at all up to maximum of 10-worst nausea imaginable (NCT00779467)
Timeframe: until delivery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine With Neostimgine 8 mcg/ml1.3
Bupivacaine and Neostigmine 4 mcg/ml1.8
Bupivacaine With Neostigmine 2 mcg/ml1.8
BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL 2 MCG/ML1.2

[back to top]

Cesarean Delivery

percentage of subjects in each group requiring a ceserean delivery (NCT00779467)
Timeframe: occurence

Interventionpercentage of subjects in each group (Number)
Bupivacaine With Neostimgine 8 mcg/ml21
Bupivacaine and Neostigmine 4 mcg/ml15
Bupivacaine With Neostigmine 2 mcg/ml24
BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL 2 MCG/ML14

[back to top]

Number of Rescue Treatments

Rescue treatment was used for participants with lack of analgesic efficacy, to have relief from breakthrough pain and in cases where withdrawal symptoms occur. The reference one-time rescue dose used was oral morphine 5 milligram (mg) for the investigational product fentanyl one-day transdermal patch 12.5 mcg per hr. The number of rescue treatments per day were reported. (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or final evaluation (early discontinuation)

Interventiontreatments per day (Mean)
Fentanyl1.0

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Total Score

The BPI-SF is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions. It includes pain interference score which is mean value for scores for 9 BPI-SF questions ranging between 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes) and pain subscale score which is mean value for scores for BPI-SF questions 3 to 6 ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as can imagine). Total BPI-SF score is an average of pain interference score and pain subscale score and ranges from 0 to 10; higher score indicates more pain or pain interference. (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or final evaluation (early discontinuation)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl5.1

[back to top]

Participants Overall Assessment

The participants assessed their satisfaction with therapeutic efficacy by 5 grades: satisfied very much, satisfied, equivocal, dissatisfied and dissatisfied very much. Percentage of participants who were at least satisfied (satisfied, satisfied very much) or at least neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (dissatisfied, dissatisfied very much) were reported. (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or final evaluation (early discontinuation)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
SatisfiedNeither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Fentanyl31.266.7

[back to top]

Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) Scores

The SF-36 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state. (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or final evaluation (early discontinuation)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physical health (summary score)Mental health (summary score)
Fentanyl23.042.1

[back to top]

Questionnaire of Opioid Withdrawal Symptoms

Questionnaire of opioid withdrawal symptoms is a clinician rated 11-item scale that primarily evaluates the physical components of opioid withdrawal and is based on questions and clinical observations. The total score of questionnaire of opioid withdrawal symptoms is the sum of all individual items, with less than (<) 5 points = no withdrawal, 5 to 12 points = mild withdrawal, 13 to 24 points = moderate withdrawal, 25 to 36 points = moderately severe withdrawal and greater than (>) 36 points = severe withdrawal. (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or endpoint (1 week after last treatment or early discontinuation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
< 5 points>=5 to <=12 points>=13 to <=24 points>=25 to <=36 points>=37 points
Fentanyl1372100

[back to top]

Physician's Global Assessment Scale

The treating physician assessed the therapeutic efficacy of the treatment by 2 grades: effective and ineffective. Numbers of participants with effective and ineffective therapeutic efficacy with the treatment were reported. (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or final evaluation (early discontinuation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
EffectiveIneffective
Fentanyl10636

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Quality of Sleep

The quality of sleep was assessed by participants that how well they have slept from the previous assessment to current assessment time by the following 4 grades: can sleep well, can sleep moderately well, cannot sleep much and cannot sleep at all. (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or final evaluation (early discontinuation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Can sleep wellCan sleep moderately wellCannot sleep muchCannot sleep at all
Fentanyl2867406

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Total Painful Time Per Day

The participants assessed total painful time in 1 day by the following 5 grades: less than 4 hours, 4 hours to less than 8 hours, 8 hours to less than 12 hours, 12 hours or more and all day. (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or final evaluation (early discontinuation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Less than 4 hours4 hours to less than 8 hours8 hours to less than 12 hours12 hours or moreAll day
Fentanyl1729234032

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pain Assessed by Categorical Scale for Pain

Pain intensity was measured by assessing the average intensity of pain experienced by the participant in daily living throughout the day by 4 grades: no pain at all, mild (slightly painful, but not worried), moderate (painful, but bearable) and severe (painful and unbearable). (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or final evaluation (early discontinuation)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No painMild painModerate painSevere pain
Fentanyl12110118

[back to top]

Dependence Questionnaire (DQ)

The DQ is a clinician rated 5-item scale that evaluates dependence on drug and based on questions (Q). Based on participant's answer to Q in questionnaire, Investigator assessed whether drug dependence occurred. It comprises 5 Q which are: continuing drug for reason other than pain, using drug in more dosage than prescribed to have effect other than treatment of pain, have ever used drug with more dosage than prescribed for other purpose, anxiety with the thought of stopping drug for reason other than aggravation of symptoms by stopping this drug and feeling to violate law to get this drug. (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or end point (early discontinuation)

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Q1:Continue to use drug for reason other than painQ 2: Wanted to use more dosage than prescribedQ3: Used drug with more dosage than prescribedQ4: Anxious with thought of stopping drugQ5: Feeling to violate law to get this drugJudgment by doctor: Dependent and abuseJudgement by doctor: Not dependent and no abuse
Fentanyl100100140

[back to top]

Pain Visual Analogue Scale Score

"Pain visual analog scale was used to assess the amount of pain experienced by the participant throughout the day by marking a slash through the line of a 100 millimeter (mm) scale measuring pain from no pain (0 mm) to worst possible pain (100 mm)." (NCT00788372)
Timeframe: Week 52 or end point (early discontinuation)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Fentanyl58.3

[back to top]

Amount of Rescue PCA Fentanyl Administered for Breakthrough Pain During the First 72 Hours.

The primary outcome metric was to be the amount of rescue epidural fentanyl administered for breakthrough pain during the first 72 hours postoperatively. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) fentanyl intake was to be summarized for each treatment group as time to first use of rescue PCA fentanyl, amount of PCA fentanyl administered over 72 hours, and total amount of PCA fentanyl administered through a number of time intervals. However, efficacy analyses were not performed because the study was terminated early after only three subjects were enrolled. (NCT00807209)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionmicrograms (Number)
Standard of Care0
Low Dose SKY04020

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 10 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain. The PID10 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 10 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. This was assessed during the double-blind treatment period. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately before treatment and 10 minutes after treatment.

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)4.83
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)3.89

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 30 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID30 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and 30 minutes after dosing

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)29.72
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)25.03

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 45 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID45 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 45 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and 45 minutes after dosing

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)44.84
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)40.49

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 45 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID45 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 45 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and 45 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)3.13
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)2.85

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 15 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed during the double-blind treatment period on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain. The PID15 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Baseline (immediately pre-dose) and 15 minutes after dosing

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)12.38
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)10.38

[back to top]

Percent Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes Posttreatment (%TOTPAR)

The PR score at set intervals after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). The maximum TOTPAR score that could be achieved at 60 minutes is equal to 16; thus, %TOTPAR at 60 minutes is (TOTPAR60 /16) x 100.The % TOTPAR achieved 60 minutes after the administration of study drug was calculated during the double-blind treatment phase. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: From 5 minutes through 60 minutes after study drug treatment

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)40.11
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)35.59

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID5 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and 5 minutes after dosing

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.01
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)0.73

[back to top]

Medication Performance Assessment 60 Minutes Post-treatment

"The medication performance assessment assessed study drug performance on a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=poor, 1=fair,2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent) 60 minutes after administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment periods and for the first 5 BTP episodes after each visit during the open-label extension period were recorded in the patient's paper diary. Patients were asked How well did your study medication perform in controlling this breakthrough pain episode? The number of episodes rated for each category were recorded." (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 60 minutes post-treatment

,
InterventionEpisodes (Number)
ExcellentVery GoodGoodFairPoorNo Response
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1603715081819230
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)11931356517913622

[back to top]

Medication Performance Assessment 30 Minutes Post-treatment

"The medication performance assessment assessed study drug performance on a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=poor, 1=fair,2=good, 3=very good, 4=excellent) 30 minutes after administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment periods and for the first 5 BTP episodes after each visit during the open-label extension period were recorded in the patient's paper diary. Patients were asked How well did your study medication perform in controlling this breakthrough pain episode? The number of episodes rated for each category were recorded." (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 30 minutes post-treatment

,
InterventionEpisodes (Number)
ExcellentVery GoodGoodFairPoorNo Response
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)4912537841634133
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)1610430439148930

[back to top]

Breakthrough Pain Preference Questionnaire

The BTP preference questionnaire is a questionnaire used to measure patients' preference for FBT or immediate-release oxycodone for management of BTP. The question is used to determine a patient's preference between the study drugs given in the 2 double-blind treatment periods. The patient was asked to select 1 of the following: 1, a preference for study drug used in the 1st double-blind treatment period; 2, a preference for study drug used in the 2nd double-blind treatment period; or 3, no preference. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: At Visit 6 ( up to 42 days depending upon how long it takes the patient to manage their BTP) after completion of both double-blind treatment periods.

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Preferred FBTPreferred OxycodoneNo PreferenceMissing
Total62462312

[back to top]

Use of Standard Rescue Medication

Any use of standard rescue medication after the administration of study drug for relief of Breakthrough Pain (BTP) during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The number of breakthrough pain episodes for which study drug treatment was administered and which required rescue medication use was recorded. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Throughout the double-blind treatment period

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)39
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)41

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief at 60 Minutes (TOTPAR60)

"The mean TOTPAR at 60 minutes will be calculated for each episode as the weighted sum of Pain Relief (PR) scores (5-point Likert scale, 0 = none to 4 = complete) at each assessment of PR (during the double-blind treatment period) until 60 minutes after study drug administration, as follows:~TOTPAR60 =(⅓ x PR5)+ (⅓ x PR10) +(⅓ x PR15)+ PR30 + PR45 + PR60. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry." (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: From 5 minutes to 60 minutes after dosing

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)6.43
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)5.70

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=60 Minutes

Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 60 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Time of study drug administration until 60 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1139
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)1047

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Endpoint

The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. Here it was assessed at the conclusion of the open-label extension period. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: At conclusion of open-label extension period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.5
Standard of Care (SOC)0.9

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=45 Minutes

Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 45 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: From study drug administration until 45 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)983
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)864

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=30 Minutes

Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 30 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Time of study drug administration until 30 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)613
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)503

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=15 Minutes

Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 15 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Time of study drug administration until 15 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)230
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)212

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment <=10 Minutes

Time to MPR(subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes in which MPR was achieved in 10 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Time of study drug treatment until 10 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)88
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)91

[back to top]

Time to Meaningful Pain Relief (MPR) by Treatment - <= 5 Minutes

Time to MPR (subjective perception of meaningful reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No MPR-rescue medication used, and No MPR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to MPR fell in that category was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: From time study drug was taken until 5 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)21
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)26

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=60 Minutes

Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 60 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Time of study drug treatment until 60 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1271
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)1239

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=45 Minutes

Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 45 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Time of study drug treatment until 45 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1217
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)1150

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=30 Minutes

Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 30 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Time of study drug administration till 30 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1004
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)877

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=15 Minutes

Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 15 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: From study drug administration to 15 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)515
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)451

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment <=10 Minutes

Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 10 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: From study drug treatment until 10 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)226
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)219

[back to top]

Time to Any Pain Relief (APR) by Treatment - <= 5 Minutes

Time to APR (subjective perception of any reduction in pain intensity) was measured by stopwatch and by scheduled questions at each time point up to 60 minutes during double-blind treatment period. No pain relief was defined as: patient indicated no pain relief experienced, rescue medication was used,or missing data. For each category (<5, <10, <15, <30, <45, <60 minutes, No APR-rescue medication used, and No APR-no rescue medication used)the number of episodes which time to APR fell in that category was compared. Number of episodes where APR was achieved in 5 minutes or less was compared. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: From time study drug was taken until 5 minutes after treatment

InterventionEpisodes (Number)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)55
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)50

[back to top]

Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 60 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID60)

"PI scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0=no pain to 10=pain as bad as you can imagine during the double-blind treatment period. The SPID60 was derived from PID values. The SPID60 scores during the double-blind treatment phase were calculated as the time- weighted sum of the PID scores from 5 through 60 minutes,after the administration of the study drug.~SPID60 = SPID30 + PID45 + PID60. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry." (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: From 5 minutes after dosing through 60 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)9.32
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)8.50

[back to top]

Sum of Pain Intensity Difference at 30 Minutes Post-treatment (SPID30)

PI scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. SPID30 were derived from PID values. The SPID30 scores during the double-blind treatment phase were calculated as the time- weighted sum of the PID scores from 5 through 30 minutes,after the administration of study drug. SPID30 = (⅓ x PID5) + (⅓ x PID10) + (⅓ x PID15) + PID30. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: From 5 minutes after dosing through 30 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)2.54
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)2.16

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Visit 8- 2 Months After Open Label Treatment

"The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician.~The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. Here it was assessed 2 months after the start of the open-label extension period.~The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination)." (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Two months after start of open-label extension period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.4
Standard of Care (SOC)0.7

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Visit 9- 3 Months After Open Label Treatment

"The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician.~The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination), which correspond to 1, 2, or 3 months after the start of the open-label extension period." (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of open-label extension period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.6
Standard of Care (SOC)0.7

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Endpoint

"The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician.~The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination)." (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: End of open-label extension period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.4
Standard of Care (SOC)0.7

[back to top]

Clinician Global Impression of Change at Visit 7- 1 Month After Open Label Treatment

"The CGIC is a standardized tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period, in the opinion of the clinician.~The 7-point scale includes very much worse=-3, much worse=-2, minimally worse=-1,no change=0, minimally improved=+1, much improved=+2, and very much improved=+3. The CGIC was completed by the clinicians at visits 7, 8, and 9 (or early termination) which correspond to 1, 2, or 3 months after the start of the open-label extension period." (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: One month after start of open-label extension

InterventionUnit on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.4
Standard of Care (SOC)0.6

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 10 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID10 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 10 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and 10 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT).35
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY).29

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 15 Minutes Post-treatment (PID15)

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID15 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 15 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and 15 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)0.88
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)0.76

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 30 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID30 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 30 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and 30 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)2.10
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)1.79

[back to top]

Percentage Change in Pain Intensity Difference (% PID) at 60 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID60 is the difference between the PI scores from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration)and 60 minutes after the administration of the study drug. The difference is calculated and assessed as a percentage of the baseline pain intensity score. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and 60 minutes after dosing

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)52.61
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)49.47

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 5 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID5 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and 5 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT).08
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY).06

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 60 Minutes Post-treatment

Pain intensity (PI) scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine after each episode of breakthrough pain during the double-blind treatment period. The PID60 is the difference between the PI score from the episode baseline (immediately prior to study drug administration) and 60 minutes after the administration of the study drug. Least squared mean was from an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment as randomized, phase, and sequence as fixed factors and patient as a random factor using compound symmetry. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: Immediately pre-dose and 60 minutes after dosing

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)3.65
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)3.48

[back to top]

Pain Relief (PR) Score at 5 Minutes Post-treatment

The PR score 5 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 5 minutes after treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)0.11
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)0.10

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score at 10 Minutes Post-treatment

The PR score 10 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 10 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)0.32
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)0.26

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score at 15 Minutes Post-treatment

The PR score 15 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)0.68
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)0.56

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score at 30 Minutes Post-treatment

The PR score 30 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.48
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)1.22

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score at 45 Minutes Post-treatment

The PR score 45 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 45 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)2.14
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)1.90

[back to top]

Pain Relief Score at 60 Minutes Post-treatment

The PR score 60 minutes after the administration of study drug during the double-blind treatment phase was recorded in the patient's diary. The PR scale is a 5-point categorical scale of 0-4 (0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=a lot, 4=complete). (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after treatment with study drug

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)2.44
Immediate-release Oxycodone (OXY)2.27

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 7- 1 Month After Open Label Treatment

The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. This was assessed 1 month after start of the open-label extension period. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: One month after start of open-label treatment

InterventionUnit on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.5
Standard of Care (SOC)0.6

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 8- 2 Months After Open Label Treatment

The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. Here it was assessed 2 months after the start of the open-label extension period. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 2 months after start of open-label extension period

InterventionUnits on scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.5
Standard of Care (SOC)0.8

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Visit 9- 3 Months After Open Label Treatment

The PGIC is a standardized self-report tool that measures the change in a patient's overall status rating since the start of the open-label extension period. The 7-point scale includes very much worse= -3, much worse= -2, minimally worse= -1, no change=0, minimally improved= +1, much improved= +2, and very much improved= +3. Here it was assessed 3 months after the start of the open-label extension period. (NCT00813488)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of open-label extension period

InterventionUnits on scale (Mean)
Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT)1.7
Standard of Care (SOC)0.8

[back to top]

Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Work Fast?) at the End of the Treatment Period

"Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, Does this medication work fast?, were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very muchQuite a bitSomewhatA little bitNot at all
FBT - Treatment Period638836124

[back to top]

Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Is This Medication Easy to Take?) at the End of the Treatment Period

"Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, Is this medication easy to take?, were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very muchQuite a bitSomewhatA little bitNot at all
FBT - Treatment Period81743198

[back to top]

Participant's Global Impression of Change at the End of the Treatment Period

Global impression of change was assessed using the question 'Since the start of the study, my overall status is?'. The answer was based on a 7-point scale (1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, and 7=Very much worse). This assessment was performed at the end of the Treatment Period (or early termination). (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very much improvedMuch improvedMinimally improvedNo changeMinimally worseMuch worseVery much worse
FBT - Treatment Period157565321470

[back to top]

Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Satisfied With BTP Treatment?) at the End of the Treatment Period

"Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, Satisfied with the BTP Treatment?, were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very muchQuite a bitSomewhatA little bitNot at all
FBT - Treatment Period64923782

[back to top]

Participants With Adverse Events (AE) Summarized by Treatment Period

Participants with treatment-emergent adverse events are summarized by each treatment period. Relation to study drug was assessed by the investigator. The 'Any AE' category below includes serious adverse events. (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 1-7 (Titration Period). Day 8-15 (Treatment Period), Days 16-688 (Continuation Period)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AEAny Serious AEAE leading to discontinuation of study drugAE with a fatal outcomeAE considered related to study drug
FBT - Continuation Period7237252914
FBT - Treatment Period4340315
FBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration Period44811619
FBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration Period741219435

[back to top]

Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes Requiring the Use of Rescue Medication During the Titration Period and the Treatment Period

The number of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes in which the participant did not obtain effective pain relief from study medication and took a rescue medication. (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Days 1 to up to Day 7 (Titration Period); approximately Day 8 up to Day 15 (Treatment Period)

InterventionBTP episodes (Number)
During Titration Period102
During Treatment Period153

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Enjoyment of Life

"Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement.~This subscale assesses enjoyment of life." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FBT - Treatment Period-1.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: General Activity

"Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement.~This subscale assesses general activity." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FBT - Treatment Period-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Mood

"Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement.~This subscale assesses mood." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FBT - Treatment Period-1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Normal Work

"Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement.~This subscale assesses normal work." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FBT - Treatment Period-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Relations With Other People

"Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement.~This subscale assesses relations with other people." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FBT - Treatment Period-1.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Sleep

"Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement.~This subscale assesses sleep." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FBT - Treatment Period-1.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire Subscale: Walking Ability

"Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. A negative change from baseline represents an improvement.~This subscale assesses walking ability." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FBT - Treatment Period-0.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Approximately Day 15) in the Brief Pain Inventory 7-item (BPI-7S) Questionnaire: Global Score

Participants completed the BPI-7S questionnaire to indicate their quality of life and functional status between study time points. For each subscale, the participant rated their responses from 0=Does not interfere through to 10=Completely interferes. The Global Score is the sum of the subscales (total scale is 0-70). A negative change from baseline represents an improvement. (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 0 (baseline), approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
FBT - Treatment Period-8.6

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Meaningful Pain Relief As Assessed by Participants During the Treatment Period For Overall Breakthrough Pain (BTP) Episodes

Overall episode data analyzed all values of time to meaningful pain relief taken over all BTP episodes during the treatment period. If meaningful pain relief was not achieved within 60 minutes of FBT intake, or if rescue medication was taken, the event was censored. Meaningful pain relief was left to the judgment of participants, who used a stopwatch and recorded the time from treatment until pain relief in a patient diary. (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 8-15

Interventionminutes (Median)
FBT - Treatment Period19.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reaching an Effective Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FBT) Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period

The effective dose was the dose that, for 2 consecutive break-through pain (BTP) episodes, provided adequate analgesia within the first 30 minutes after administration of study drug and that minimized undesirable effects. The assessment was performed by the participant and was reported in the titration-period diary. The next BTP episode was used to confirm the effective dose, and if confirmed, the effective dose was used for all following BTP episodes. (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 7

Interventionpercentage of treated participants (Number)
FBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration Period75.2
FBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration Period81.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reaching An Effective Dose As Assessed by the Participant During the Titration Period

Number of participants for which an effective dose of FBT was reached as judged by each participant. The effective dose was the dose that, for 2 consecutive break-through pain (BTP) episodes, provided adequate analgesia within the first 30 minutes after administration of study drug and that minimized undesirable effects. The assessment was performed by the participant and was reported in the titration-period diary. The next BTP episode was used to confirm the effective dose, and if confirmed, the effective dose was used for all following BTP episodes. (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 7

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
100 mcg200 mcg300 mcg (evaluated by mistake)400 mcg600 mcg800 mcgMissing
FBT 100 Mcg - Dose Titration Period34381238536
FBT 200 Mcg - Dose Titration Period761142151031

[back to top]

Participant Assessment of Medication Performance During the Treatment Period

Participants assessed the performance of FBT at 30 minutes and 60 minutes after dosing each episode during the treatment period. For each episode, the participant answered the question 'How well did your study medication perform in controlling the breakthrough pain episode?' on a 5-point Likert-type scale (poor=0, fair=1, good=2, very good=3, and excellent=4). (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 8-15

,
InterventionBTP episodes (Number)
ExcellentVery goodGoodFairPoorMissing
30 Minutes10343371242810035
60 Minutes14458464624549143

[back to top]

Participant's Global Assessment of Ease of Use at the End of the Treatment Period

Ease of use was assessed using the question 'Did you find this treatment easy/convenient to use for treatment of your breakthrough pain episodes?'. The answer was based on a 4-point numerical scale (0=Poor, 1=Fair, 2=Easy, 3=Very Easy). This assessment was performed at the end of the Treatment Period (or early termination). (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very easyEasyFairPoor
FBT - Treatment Period67107287

[back to top]

Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Feel Safe Taking This Medication?) at the End of the Treatment Period

"Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, Do you feel safe taking this medication?, were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very muchQuite a bitSomewhatA little bitNot at all
FBT - Treatment Period96881720

[back to top]

Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Find This Medication Comfortable to Take in Public?) at the End of the Treatment Period

"Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, Do you find this medication comfortable to take in public?, were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very muchQuite a bitSomewhatA little bitNot at all
FBT - Treatment Period817826108

[back to top]

Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Do You Understand the Instructions?) at the End of the Treatment Period

"Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, Do you understand the instructions?, were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very muchQuite a bitSomewhatA little bitNot at all
FBT - Treatment Period107811320

[back to top]

Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This BTP Medication Relieve Your Pain Quickly so You Can Get Back to Sleep?) at the End of the Treatment Period

"Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, Does this BTP medication relieve your pain quickly so you can get back to sleep?, were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very muchQuite a bitSomewhatA little bitNot at all
FBT - Treatment Period5510427133

[back to top]

Participant's Global Assessment of Satisfaction (Does This Medication Provide Adequate Relief?) at the End of the Treatment Period

"Responses to the Patient Satisfaction questionnaire question, Does this medication provide adequate relief?, were captured on a five-point scale from 0=not at all to 4=very much." (NCT00842829)
Timeframe: approximately Day 15 (end of Treatment Period)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very muchQuite a bitSomewhatA little bitNot at all
FBT - Treatment Period571043552

[back to top]

ACTH and Cytokine Levels

N = 48 n = 16 (LDF); n = 17 (HDF); n = 15 (LDF + Dex) ACTH assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); Cytokine levels in plasma were measured using the Immulite automated chemiluminometer. Measured cytokines include interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α. (NCT00848393)
Timeframe: Blood draws to measure cytokines levels within one hour of draw: after induction; after sternotomy; after starting cardiopulmonary bypass; at the end of the procedure; and 24 hours after the procedure.

,,
Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Baseline ACTH (pg/mL)Post-Sternotomy ACTH (pg/mL)Post-Bypass ACTH (pg/mL)End-Of-Surgery ACTH (pg/mL)24 hour Post-Surgery ACTH (pg/mL)Baseline TNF-alpha (pg/mL)Post-Sternotomy TNF-alpha (pg/mL)Post-Bypass TNF-alpha (pg/mL)End-Of-Surgery TNF-alpha (pg/mL)24 hour Post-Surgery TNF-alpha (pg/mL)Baseline IL-6 (pg/mL)Post-Sternotomy IL-6 (pg/mL)Post-Bypass IL-6 (pg/mL)End-Of-Surgery IL-6 (pg/mL)24 hour Post-Surgery IL-6 (pg/mL)Baseline IL-8 (pg/mL)Post-Sternotomy IL-8 (pg/mL)Post-Bypass IL-8 (pg/mL)End-Of-Surgery IL-8 (pg/mL)24 hour Post-Surgery IL-8 (pg/mL)Baseline IL-10 (pg/mL)Post-Sternotomy IL-10 (pg/mL)Post-Bypass IL-10 (pg/mL)End-Of-Surgery IL-10 (pg/mL)24 hour Post-Surgery IL-10 (pg/mL)
Fentanyl (High Dose)116.944.557.266.412.715.7007726.5184624.3061523.8707715.796.6370588245.4023535.09882420.48571126.081317.1235320.776479.77058828.149.0714310.823539.9117659.488235345.441210.80667
Fentanyl (Low Dose)182.786.2172.7155.053.225.29424.49725.78724.85711.9544.75714285712.173335.50937522.47333117.97510.4428610.6666710.1312533.1266747.259.99.99.9325.5514.80833
Fentanyl (Low Dose) + Dexmedetomidine135.3106.9191.6154.122.48.01818217.8863620.3436423.0609121.139095.5428571436.2413335.04066720.79231142.157110.2571410.866679.67333337.2214324.2714312.7642914.1066712.30667569.27149.692857

[back to top]

Stanford-Binet Cognitive Ability

The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale is now in its fifth edition (SB5) and was released in 2003. It is a cognitive ability and intelligence test that is used to diagnose developmental or intellectual deficiencies in young children. The test measures five weighted factors and consists of both verbal and nonverbal subtests. The five factors being tested are knowledge, quantitative reasoning, visual-spatial processing, working memory, and fluid reasoning. Raw scores for each subtest within the overall test are converted to scaled scores using a table within each test manual to look up equivalents. Scaled scores are then converted to standard scores (range=50-150). Higher scores suggest a higher level of functioning related to each category. (NCT00848393)
Timeframe: 1-4 yrs post-surgery

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Quantative Reasoning ScoreKnowledge ScoreVisual Spatial Processing ScoreWorking Memory ScoreFluid Reasoning Score
Fentanyl (High Dose)10691919486
Fentanyl (Low Dose)9697979293
Fentanyl (Low Dose) + Dexmedetomidine8295928475

[back to top]

Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales

The Stanford-Binet test evaluates the overall IQ score from the assessment of cognitive ability. The test consists of 15 subtests, grouped into the four area scores. Six subtests are administered to all age levels. The subtests are: Vocabulary, Comprehension, Pattern Analysis, Quantitative, Bead Memory, and Memory for Sentences. Number of tests administered and test difficulty are based on the test taker's age and performance on subtest measuring word knowledge. The word knowledge subtest is given to all test takers and is the first subtest administered. A score of 100 is in the normal or average range. Higher scores suggest a higher level of functioning related to each category. (University of Cincinnati, 2003) Raw scores for each subtest within the overall test are converted to scaled scores using a table within each test manual to look up equivalents. Scaled scores are then converted to standard scores (range=50-150). (NCT00848393)
Timeframe: 1-4 yrs. post-surgery

,,
InterventionIQ (Mean)
Nonverbal IQ composite scoreVerbal IQ composite scoreFull-scale IQ composite score
Fentanyl (High Dose)929393
Fentanyl (Low Dose)989194
Fentanyl (Low Dose) + Dexmedetomidine898083

[back to top]

Stress Hormone Levels

Cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). (NCT00848393)
Timeframe: Blood draws to measure stress hormone levels within one hour of draw: after induction; after sternotomy; after starting cardiopulmonary bypass; at the end of the procedure; and 24 hours after the procedure.

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Baseline NorepinephrinePost-Sternotomy NorepinephrinePost-Bypass NorepinephrineEnd-of-Surgery Norepinephrine24 hour Post-Surgery NorepinephrineBaseline ephinephrinePost-Sternotomy EpinephrinePost-Bypass EpinephrineEnd-of-Surgery Epinephrine24 hour Post-Surgery EpinephrineBaseline CortisolPost-Sternotomy CortisolPost-Bypass CortisolEnd-of-Surgery Cortisol24 hour Post-Surgery Cortisol
Fentanyl (High Dose)13.3261816.260623.3579611.2237619.030312.78482.37601218.17614.657425.004787334.7762353.5396279.0063333.0644237.5506
Fentanyl (Low Dose)19.3415317.0876622.3106410.7473120.854336.4392219.84359121.90758.6206693.537063449.1974363.5948395.1298463.3857266.8754
Fentanyl (Low Dose) + Dexmedetomidine19.4596812.7445819.736127.72705526.673795.87633510.8982420.52948.0830044.418208352.4913361.0074354.8089387.3673265.7373

[back to top]

ABAS-II

The ABAS-II is designed to evaluate whether an individual displays various functional skills necessary for daily living without the assistance of others. Thus, this instrument focuses on independent behaviors and measures what an individual actually does, in addition to measuring what he or she may be able to do. In addition, the ABAS-II focuses on behaviors an individual displays on his or her own, without assistance from others. The Parent/Primary Caregiver Form is a comprehensive, diagnostic measure of the adaptive skills that have primary relevance for the functioning of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers in the home and other settings, and can be completed by parents or other primary care providers. Each composite or domain score is determined by summing the appropriate scaled scores and then determining its equivalent composite or domain score by looking it up in a table located in the manual.The range for all scores is 50-150, with a higher score equaling a better outcome. (NCT00848393)
Timeframe: 1-4 yrs post-surgery

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
ABAS-II General Adaptive Composite ScoreABAS-II Conceptual Adaptive Domain ScoreABAS-II Social Adaptive Domain ScoreABAS-II Practical Adaptive Domain Score
Fentanyl (High Dose)969910293
Fentanyl (Low Dose)10210610696
Fentanyl (Low Dose) + Dexmedetomidine1009910595

[back to top]

Comparisons Between Groups for Narcotic and/or Dexmedetomidine Intervention Influence on Time on Ventilator.

(NCT00848393)
Timeframe: Time of intubation to extubation (variable)

InterventionHours (Median)
Fentanyl (High Dose)10.75
Fentanyl (Low Dose)3.79
Fentanyl (Low Dose) + Dexmedetomidine2.4

[back to top]

Comparisons Between Groups for Narcotic and/or Dexmedetomidine Intervention Influence on Length of CTICU Stay.

(NCT00848393)
Timeframe: Hospital admission to discharge from CTICU (average of 2-4 days)

InterventionDays (Median)
Fentanyl (High Dose)1
Fentanyl (Low Dose)1
Fentanyl (Low Dose) + Dexmedetomidine2

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects That do Not Require Rescue Midazolam (MDZ) for Sedation Based on Achieving and Maintaining a Target University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) Score of 1 to 3 While Intubated.

"Clinical Score Level of Sedation 0 Awake/Alert~Minimally Sedated: Tired/sleepy, appropriate response to verbal conversation and/or sounds.~Moderately Sedated: Somnolent/sleeping, easily aroused with light tactile stimulation.~Deeply sedated: Deep sleep, arousable only with significant physical stimulation.~Unarousable" (NCT00875550)
Timeframe: 6 to 24 hours

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Dexmedetomidine Low Dose44.6
Dexmedetomidine High Dose54.3

[back to top]

Time to First Dose of Rescue Medication for Sedation and Analgesia

(NCT00875550)
Timeframe: 6 to 24 hours

InterventionHours (Median)
Dexmedetomidine Low Dose1.6
Dexmedetomidine High Dose2.0

[back to top]

Time to Successful Extubation

(NCT00875550)
Timeframe: 6 to 24 hours

InterventionHours (Median)
Dexmedetomidine Low Dose23.8
Dexmedetomidine High Dose20.5

[back to top]

Total Amount of Rescue Medication Required for Sedation and Analgesia While Intubated

(NCT00875550)
Timeframe: 6 to 24 hours

,
InterventionMilligram (Mean)
MidazolamFentanylMorphine
Dexmedetomidine High Dose1.24144.3671.141
Dexmedetomidine Low Dose2.22145.2251.446

[back to top]

Absolute Time on Study Drug That the Subject is in a UMSS Range of 1 to 3 While Intubated

(NCT00875550)
Timeframe: 6 to 24 hours

InterventionHours (Median)
Dexmedetomidine Low Dose17.2
Dexmedetomidine High Dose17.3

[back to top]

Absolute Time on Study Drug That the Subject is Out of the Target Sedation Range (UMSS <1 or >3) While Intubated

(NCT00875550)
Timeframe: 6 to 24 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Dexmedetomidine Low Dose1.0
Dexmedetomidine High Dose0.7

[back to top]

Cmax of Fentanyl

Cmax is defined as the maximum drug concentration in plasma and was determined from individual plasma concentration versus time data. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were drawn pre-dose; 15 and 30 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours post-dose. Fentanyl concentration assays were performed using a fully validated and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Results are reported for patients with and without mucositis. (NCT00956254)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to 12 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray 100 µg - Mucositis0.67
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray 100 µg - Non-mucositis0.26

[back to top]

Tmax of Fentanyl

Tmax is defined as the time to reach the maximum concentration of fentanyl in plasma and was determined from individual concentration versus time data. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were drawn pre-dose; and 15 and 30 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours post-dose. Fentanyl concentration assays were performed using a fully validated and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Results are reported for patients with and without mucositis. (NCT00956254)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to 12 hours post-dose

Interventionhr (Mean)
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray 100 µg - Mucositis0.53
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray 100 µg - Non-mucositis0.56

[back to top]

AUC0-last of Fentanyl

AUC0-last is defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time-zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration of fentanyl, was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule, and was determined from individual concentration versus time data. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were drawn pre-dose; and 15 and 30 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours post-dose. Fentanyl concentration assays were performed using a fully validated and sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Results are reported for patients with and without mucositis. (NCT00956254)
Timeframe: Pre-dose to 12 hours post-dose

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray 100 µg - Mucositis3.11
Fentanyl Sublingual Spray 100 µg - Non-mucositis0.91

[back to top]

Dyspnea Intensity Measured by the 10-point Borg Scale During Cycle Exercise

"The 10-point Borg scale ranges from 0 nothing at all to 10 maximal/extremely strong and was used to rate the intensity of dyspnea during exercise; therefore, a decrease in this rating signifies an improvement. Dyspnea intensity was assessed at the highest equivalent standardized time achieved in both post-treatment constant work rate cycle exercise tests." (NCT00974220)
Timeframe: 10-minutes post-treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo2.6
Fentanyl2.0

[back to top]

Cycle Exercise Endurance Time

Constant workrate cycle endurance during tests at 75% of the peak incremental workrate (NCT00974220)
Timeframe: 10-minutes post-treatment

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo6.04
Fentanyl7.34

[back to top]

Patient: How Many Episodes of Pain You Experience on Average?

(NCT00994760)
Timeframe: initial visit (before start of therapy with Instanyl)

Interventionepisodes per day (Mean)
First Visit3.0

[back to top]

Patient: How do You Feel Today?

Scale: 1=very bad, 2=bad, 3=mediocre, 4=good, 5=very good (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Initial Visit2.2
Last Visit3.3

[back to top]

Caregiver: Degree of Relief of Breakthrough Pain Achieved by Instany at Study End

0=no reduction, 1=slight, 2=medium, 3=strong, 4=very strong, 5=complete (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Caregiver at Final Visit3.3

[back to top]

Patient: Quality-of-Life-Impairment by Pain =QLIP - Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only) Conspicuous ≤20

"0= conspicuous ≤20~1= inconspicuous >20" (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
QLIP - score (classified):QLIP conspicuous (≤20)QLIP - score (classified):QLIP inconspicuous (>20)Missing
Initial Visit80132
Last Visit21611

[back to top]

Patient: Marburg Questionnaire on Habitual Health (MQHH): Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only) Conspicuous <1.5

conspicuous score <1.5 inconspicuous score ≥1.5 (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
MQHH - score (classified):conspicuous:score <1.5MQHH - score (classified):inconspicuous:score ≥1.5Missing
Initial Visit62312
Last Visit24572

[back to top]

Patient: To What Extent Changes Have Occurred Induced by the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain With Instanyl With Respect to ...(at Last Visit)

Scale: -3= very much improved, -2= much improved, -1= improved , 0= comparable, 1= worsened, 2= much worsened, 3= very much worsened (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (at last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Nursing and support efforts (N= 81)Autonomy of the patient (N= 81)Pain-related impairment in everyday life (N= 81)Quality of patient's life (N= 81)
Patients at Final Visit-1.0-1.4-1.3-1.4

[back to top]

Patient: Description of Pain at Initial Visit

0=no pain, 10= most intense pain imaginable (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: initial visit (before start of therapy with Instanyl)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Persistent pain in the last 24 hrs on average N=94Pain during the last pain attacks maximally N=93Pain intensity bearable N= 94
Patients at First Visit5.68.34.0

[back to top]

Patient: To What Extent Did Your Expectations in Instanyl Have Met With Respect to ... (Last Visit)

5=completely, 4=for the most part, 3=partially, 2=more or less, 1=rather not, 0=not at all (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
speed of action (N=79)strength of action (N=80)tolerability (N=78)handling (N=79)total satisfaction (N=80)
Patients at Final Visit4.24.24.34.24.2

[back to top]

Patient: Marburg Questionnaire on Habitual Health (MQHH): Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only)

Scale: 0=worst, 5=best (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Initial Visit1.2
Last Visit2.2

[back to top]

Physician: Assessment of Breakthrough Pain Therapy (Initial Visit: Previous/Last Visit: Instanyl)

Scale: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=satisfactory, 4=poor, 5=very poor, 6=insufficient (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
speed of action (FV: N= 45, LV: N= 114)strength of action (FV: N= 45, LV: N= 115)tolerability (FV: N= 44, LV: N= 113)safety (FV: N= 45, LV: N= 114)handling (FV: N= 45, LV: N= 115)patient satisfaction (FV: N= 45, LV: N= 116)
First Visit (FV): Patients With Previous BTP- Medication Only4.04.03.02.93.44.2
Last Visit (LV)1.71.81.71.72.11.9

[back to top]

Physician: What is the Current Treatment Needs of Your Patient Regarding ...

Scale: 0=no, 1=low, 2=medium, 3=high (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
persistent pain (IV: N=131, LV: N=112)breakthrough pain (IV: N=130, LV: N=111)nausea (IV: N=130, LV: N=112)vomiting (IV: N=130, LV: N=112)dyspnoea (IV: N=130, LV: N=111)constipation (IV: N=129, LV: N=112)weakness (IV: N=129, LV: N=112)poor appetite (IV: N=131, LV: N=112)tiredness (IV: N=130, LV: N=112)efforts due to wounds/decubitus (N=130, N=112)need for assistance (IV: N=130, LV: N=111)depressiveness (IV: N=129, LV: N=111)anxiety (IV: N=130, LV: N=112)tension (IV: N=130, LV: N=112)disorientation, confusion (IV: N=130, LV: N=111)Problems with organization of care (N=129, N=112)Overburdening family/environment N=129, N=112
Initial Visit (IV)2.02.51.51.21.01.22.01.81.81.01.81.61.61.60.61.11.4
Last Visit (LV)1.31.20.90.70.70.81.41.41.40.81.31.11.11.20.50.81.0

[back to top]

Physician: To What Extent Changes Have Occurred Induced by the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain With Instanyl With Respect to ... (at Last Visit)

Scale: -3= very much improved, -2= much improved, -1= improved, 0= comparable, 1= worsened, 2= much worsened ,3= very much worsened (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (at last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Nursing and support efforts (N= 113)Autonomy of the patient (N= 113)Pain-related impairment in everyday life (N= 113)Quality of patient's life (N= 112)Extent of use of other medical services (N= 112)
GENISIS-1.2-1.5-1.6-1.5-1.1

[back to top]

Physician: Degree of Maximum Pain Intensity During the Last Days/ Since the Last Examination

Scale: 0=no, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=strong, 4=very strong, 5=extreme (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Persistent pain (IV: N= 126, LV: N= 116)Breakthrough pain (IV: N= 126, LV: N= 115)
Initial Visit2.33.5
Last Visit1.61.8

[back to top]

Caregiver: To What Extent the Treatment Needs of Your Patient Has Changed by the Use of Instanyl Regarding ...

Scale: -3= very much less, -2= much less, -1= less, 0=comparable, 1= more, 2= much more, 3= very much more (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
persistent pain (N=68)breakthrough pain (N=68)nausea (N=68)vomiting (N=65)dyspnoea (N=66)constipation (N=68)weakness (N=68)poor appetite (N=68)tiredness (N=67)efforts due to wounds/decubitus (N=68)need for assistance in daily activities (N=68)depressiveness (N=67)anxiety (N=67)tension (N=67)disorientation, confusion (N=67)Problems with the organization of care (N=68)Overburdening family/environment (N=68)
Caregiver at Final Visit-1.2-1.8-1.1-0.9-1.1-0.8-0.7-0.7-0.8-0.8-1.1-1.0-1.2-1.1-0.9-1.0-1.2

[back to top]

Caregiver: To What Extent Changes Have Occurred Induced by the Treatment of Breakthrough Pain With Instanyl With Respect to ... (at Last Visit)

Scale: -3= very much improved, -2= much improved, -1= improved , 0= comparable, 1= worsened, 2= much worsened, 3= very much worsened (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (at last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Nursing and support efforts (N= 69)Autonomy of the patient (N= 69)Pain-related impairment in everyday life (N= 69)Quality of patient's life (N= 68)Extent of use of other medical services (N= 69)
Caregiver at Final Visit-0.8-1.2-1.3-1.3-0.9

[back to top]

Caregiver: Assessment of Breakthrough Pain Therapy by Instanyl (Last Visit)

Scale: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=satisfactory, 4=poor, 5=very poor, 6=insufficient (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
speed of action (N=69)strength of action (N=69)tolerability (N=69)safety (N=68)handling (N=69)patient satisfaction (N=68)
Caregiver at Final Visit2.22.11.92.02.22.1

[back to top]

Physician: To What Extent Did Your Expectations in Instanyl Have Met? (Last Visit)

5=completely, 4=for the most part, 3=partially, 2= more or less, 1=rather not, 0=not at all (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physician Last Visit (LV)4.4

[back to top]

Physician: Degree of Relief of Breakthrough Pain Achieved by Instanyl at Study End

0=no reduction, 1=slight, 2=medium, 3=strong, 4=very strong, 5=complete (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Last Visit3.4

[back to top]

Dose of Instanyl

Initially prescribed dose/ most efficient single dose of Instanyl at study end (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: during therapy with Instanyl (planned: 28 days)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
50 µg100 µg200 µg400 µgMissing
Study End30691511
Study Start7550501

[back to top]

Patient: Assessment of Breakthrough Pain Therapy (Initial Visit: Previous/Last Visit: Instanyl)

Scale: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=satisfactory, 4=poor, 5=very poor, 6=insufficient (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
speed of action (FV: N=33, LV: N=82)strength of action (FV: N=33, LV: N=82)tolerability (FV: N=33, LV: N=82)handling (FV: N=33, LV: N=80)total satisfaction (FV: N=NA, LV: N=82)
First Visit (FV)(Patients With Previous BTP-medication Only)4.13.93.23.4NA
Last Visit (LV)2.02.02.02.02.0

[back to top]

Patient: To What Extent Your Present Condition is Affected by Your Pain Attacks?

Scale: 0=not at all, 10=completely (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Initial Visit7.6
Last Visit3.8

[back to top]

Patient: Quality-of-Life-Impairment by Pain =QLIP - Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only)

Scale: 0=complete impairment, 43=no impairment (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Initial Visit12.3
Last Visit24.7

[back to top]

Patient: Modified Pain Disability Index (mPDI) - Sum - Score (Complete Questionnaires Only)

Scale: 0=no impairment, 70=complete impairment (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: before and after therapy with Instanyl (first/last visit)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Initial Visit51.9
Last Visit29.1

[back to top]

Patient: Degree of Relief of Breakthrough Pain Achieved by Instanyl at Study End

0=no reduction, 1=slight, 2=medium, 3=strong, 4=very strong, 5=complete (NCT00994760)
Timeframe: after therapy with Instanyl (planned: 4 weeks)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Patients at Final Visit3.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

"The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied very much. The results were reported as Category 1 = At least Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and Category 2 = At least Satisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Satisfied." (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1, Category 1 (n=258)Day 1, Category 2 (n=258)Day 29/Final evaluation, Category 1 (n=257)Day 29/ Final evaluation, Category 2 (n=257)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)8515220146

[back to top]

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective. (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1, Effective (n= 84, 79)Day 1, Ineffective (n= 84, 79)Day 85/Final evaluation, Effective (n= 84, 79)Day 85/Final evaluation, Ineffective (n= 84, 79)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)8407014
Placebo (Double-blind Period)7904732

[back to top]

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective. (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EffectiveIneffective
Fentanyl (Titration Period)21444

[back to top]

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind Period

"The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered No pain at all, and the right margin (100 mm) was considered Severer pain than this is inconceivable. The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of titration period and during 3 days before the end of double-blind period was reported." (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 27-29 (Titration period) and Day 83-85 (double-blind period)

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Baseline (n=84, 79)Last 3 days in double-blind period (n=83, 79)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)30.129.6
Placebo (Double-blind Period)27.537.1

[back to top]

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration Period

"The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered No pain at all, and the right margin (100 mm) was considered Severer pain than this is inconceivable. The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of Screening period and during 3 days before the end of titration period was reported." (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 12-14 (Screening period) and Day 27-29 (Titration period)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Baseline (n=258)Last 3 days in titration period (n=257)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)73.539.5

[back to top]

Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Double-Blind Period

The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state. (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1, Physical Component Score (n=84, 79)Day 1, Mental Component Score (n=84, 79)Day 85/Final, Physical Component Score (n=84, 79)Day 85/Final, Mental Component Score (n=84, 79)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)28.047.329.947.1
Placebo (Double-blind Period)29.447.727.647.2

[back to top]

Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) Score - Titration Period

The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state. (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1, Physical Component Score (n=258)Day 1, Mental Component Score (n=258)Day 29/Final, Physical Component Score (n=257)Day 29/Final, Mental Component Score (n=257)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)23.141.726.045.8

[back to top]

Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic Efficacy

Time from start of double-blind (researchers and participants were unaware of the treatment) period to withdrawal because of insufficient analgesic efficacy based on any of the pre-defined discontinuation criteria was noted. (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 85 (double-blind period) and Day 92 (discontinuation of the study)

InterventionDays (Median)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)NA
Placebo (Double-blind Period)45.0

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind Period

The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions [questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 [questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain. (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1 (n=84, 79)Day 85/Final evaluation (n=84, 79)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)3.33.5
Placebo (Double-blind Period)3.13.7

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration Period

The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions [questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 [questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain. (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1 (n=258)Day 29/Final evaluation (n=257)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)5.83.9

[back to top]

Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind Period

If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary. (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionTreatments per day (Mean)
Day 1 (n=84, 79)Day 85/Final evaluation (n=84, 79)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)0.10.4
Placebo (Double-blind Period)0.10.7

[back to top]

Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration Period

If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary. (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionTreatments per day (Mean)
Day 1 (n=258)Day 29/Final evaluation (n=258)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)0.10.5

[back to top]

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

"The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied very much. The results were reported as Category 1 = At least Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and Category 2 = At least Satisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Satisfied." (NCT01008553)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1, Category 1 (n=84, 79)Day 1, Category 2 (n=84, 79)Day 85/Final evaluation, Category 1 (n=84, 78)Day 85/Final evaluation, Category 2 (n=84, 78)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)82616949
Placebo (Double-blind Period)79675632

[back to top]

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

"The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied very much. The results were reported as Category 1 = At least Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and Category 2 = At least Satisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Satisfied." (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1, Category 1 (n=218)Day 1, Category 2 (n=218)Day 29/Final evaluation, Category 1 (n=218)Day 29/ Final evaluation, Category 2 (n=218)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)7711183124

[back to top]

Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Titration Period

If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary. The mean number of treatments per day at each assessment time was reported. (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionTreatments per day (Mean)
Day 1 (n=218)Day 29/Final evaluation (n=218)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)0.00.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Participant's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

"The participant assessed his/her satisfaction with the therapeutic efficacy by the following 5 grades: Extremely satisfied, Satisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Dissatisfied and Dissatisfied very much. The results were reported as Category 1 = At least Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and Category 2 = At least Satisfied, which included participants with general evaluation of Extremely satisfied to Satisfied." (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1, Category 1 (n=73, 77)Day 1, Category 2 (n=73, 77)Day 85/Final evaluation, Category 1 (n=73, 77)Day 85/Final evaluation, Category 2 (n=73, 77)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)71576342
Placebo (Double-blind Period)76635635

[back to top]

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Double-Blind Period

Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective. (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Day 1, Effective (n= 73, 77)Day 1, Ineffective (n= 73, 77)Day 85/Final evaluation, Effective (n= 73, 77)Day 85/Final evaluation, Ineffective (n= 73, 77)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)730649
Placebo (Double-blind Period)7705126

[back to top]

Number of Participants Evaluated as Per Physician's Overall Assessment - Titration Period

Physician's global assessment of therapeutic efficacy (effectiveness) of the study drug was measured on a 2-point scale where 1 = effective and 2 = not effective. (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
EffectiveIneffective
Fentanyl (Titration Period)18533

[back to top]

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Titration Period

"The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered No pain at all, and the right margin (100 mm) was considered Severer pain than this is inconceivable. The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of Screening period and during 3 days before the end of titration period was reported." (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 12-14 (Screening period) and Day 27-29 (Titration period)

Interventionmm (Mean)
Last 3 days in Screening period (n=218)Last 3 days in titration period (n=216)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)74.139.71

[back to top]

Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) - Double-Blind Period:

The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state. (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1, Physical Component Score (n=73, 77)Day 1, Mental Component Score (n=73, 77)Day 85/Final, Physical Component Score (n=73, 77)Day 85/Final, Mental Component Score (n=73, 77)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)25.850.124.349.9
Placebo (Double-blind Period)22.850.822.551.0

[back to top]

Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) - Titration Period

The SF-36v2 is 36-item form related to 8 health concepts (physical functioning, role physical, role emotional, general health, social functioning, bodily pain, vitality, mental health) and 2 summary scores (physical and mental component summary). Physical functioning, role physical and bodily pain contribute to physical component; role emotional, social functioning and mental health contribute to mental component; and social functioning, vitality, and general health contribute to both. All scores are based on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores defining more favorable health state. (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1, Physical Component Score (n=218)Day 1, Mental Component Score (n=218)Day 29/Final, Physical Component Score (n=217)Day 29/Final, Mental Component Score (n=217)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)17.148.223.348.5

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Double-Blind Period

The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions [questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 [questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain. (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1 (n=73, 77)Day 85/Final evaluation (n=73, 77)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)3.23.2
Placebo (Double-blind Period)3.23.9

[back to top]

Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score - Double-Blind Period

"The intensity of average pain (degree of pain) felt by the participants in daily living throughout the day on a 100-millimeter (mm) VAS scale by drawing a slash. The left margin (0 mm) was considered No pain at all, and the right margin (100 mm) was considered Severer pain than this is inconceivable. The length (mm) from the left margin to the slash is measured. Mean VAS score during 3 days before the end of titration period and during 3 days before the end of double-blind period was reported." (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 27-29 (Titration period) and Day 83-85 (double-blind period)

,
Interventionmm (Mean)
Last 3 days in titration period (n=73, 77)Last 3 days in double-blind period (n=72, 77)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)28.928.9
Placebo (Double-blind Period)29.636.5

[back to top]

Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf) Score - Titration Period

The BPI-sf total score is an average of the pain interference score (mean value for the nine BPI-sf questions [questions inquiring about the extent of interference with activities by pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)]) and pain subscale score (mean value for the scores for BPI-sf questions 3, 4, 5 and 6 [questions inquiring about the extent of pain, where the extent is ranked from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine)]). Total score ranges from 0 to 10 with higher values indicating more pain. (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 29 or final evaluation (Titration period)

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1 (n=218)Day 29/Final evaluation (n=217)
Fentanyl (Titration Period)5.94.0

[back to top]

Number of Doses of Rescue Treatment Per Day - Double-Blind Period

If a breakthrough pain occurred or the analgesic efficacy became insufficient, a fast-acting oral morphine was administered. At such instances, one-time dose of the rescue treatment was administered as per the pre-defined criteria. During hospitalization, Investigator, Sub-investigator or Study Collaborator recorded in the medical record and during the out-patient period, the participants were instructed to describe the name of rescue treatment, date and time of treatment, and one-time dose in the participant's diary. The mean number of treatments per day at each assessment time was reported. (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 and 85 or final evaluation (double-blind period)

,
InterventionTreatments per day (Mean)
Day 1 (n=73, 77)Day 85/Final evaluation (n=72, 77)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)0.00.2
Placebo (Double-blind Period)0.00.2

[back to top]

Time From the Initial Day of Application in Double-Blind Period to Withdrawal Because of Insufficient Analgesic Efficacy

Time from start of double-blind (researchers and participants were unaware of the treatment) period to withdrawal because of insufficient analgesic efficacy based on any of the pre-defined discontinuation criteria was noted. (NCT01008618)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 85 (double-blind period) and Day 92 (discontinuation of the study)

InterventionDays (Median)
Fentanyl (Double-blind Period)NA
Placebo (Double-blind Period)NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With ICU Complications

(NCT01059929)
Timeframe: daily through day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dexmedetomidine0
Propofol0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Completing Activities of Daily Living

activities of daily living: eating, bathing, dressing, grooming, toileting (NCT01059929)
Timeframe: daily through day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dexmedetomidine7
Propofol6

[back to top]

Number of Patients Completing Mobility Milestones

Milestones: sitting upright independently, standing independently, transfer to chair, marching in place, ambulating independently (NCT01059929)
Timeframe: Daily through day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dexmedetomidine7
Propofol6

[back to top]

Number of Patients Requiring Fentanyl

(NCT01059929)
Timeframe: during infusion of study medication up to day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dexmedetomidine3
Propofol6

[back to top]

Number of Patients Requiring Midazolam

(NCT01059929)
Timeframe: during infusion of study medication through day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dexmedetomidine3
Propofol0

[back to top]

Proportion of Days With Delirium

delirium assessment using CAM-ICU (NCT01059929)
Timeframe: daily up to 28 days

Interventionproportion of days (Median)
Dexmedetomidine0
Propofol.33

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Medication Effects

(NCT01059929)
Timeframe: duration of infusion of study medication up to 28 days

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Dexmedetomidine0
Propofol0

[back to top]

Days in Hospital

(NCT01059929)
Timeframe: 60 days from enrollment

Interventiondays (Median)
Dexmedetomidine14.33
Propofol12.96

[back to top]

Days in ICU

(NCT01059929)
Timeframe: 60 days from enollment

Interventiondays (Median)
Dexmedetomidine6.39
Propofol5.61

[back to top]

Days on Ventilator

(NCT01059929)
Timeframe: 60 days from enrollment

Interventiondays (Median)
Dexmedetomidine3.85
Propofol4.05

[back to top]

Drug Efficacy According to Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) Score

Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS). This is a validated scale that measures level of sedation. The scale ranges from -5 to +4. -5 refers to a state where one is unarousable, +4 refers to a state where one is combative. The median and inter-quartile range over all daily assessments will be provided. (NCT01059929)
Timeframe: Daily up to day 28

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Dexmedetomidine-1
Propofol-1.6

[back to top]

Mortality

(NCT01059929)
Timeframe: 28 days from enrollment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dexmedetomidine8
Propofol12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Pain Treatment

Participants were assessed for their satisfaction for pain treatment after the application of the Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-fentanyl D-trans. (NCT01060124)
Timeframe: Day 29

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-Fentanyl D-trans82.81

[back to top]

Difference in Pain Intensity Before and After Administration of (TTS)-Fentanyl D-trans

Pain intensity difference was measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, which ranges from 0 to 10 centimeter (cm) where 0 cm=no pain and 10 cm= unimaginably severe pain. (NCT01060124)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 29

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Day 1Day 29
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-Fentanyl D-trans6.613.66

[back to top]

Initial and End Point Dose of TTS-Fentanyl D-trans

Dose of TTS-fentanyl D-trans were monitored at start and end of the trial. (NCT01060124)
Timeframe: Day 1 and Day 29

Interventionmicrogram per hour (mcg/hr) (Mean)
Initial doseEnd-point dose
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-Fentanyl D-trans12.0026.47

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Detailed Reason for Satisfaction With the Pain Treatment

Participants were assessed for satisfaction for pain treatment after the administration of the TTS-fentanyl D-trans in detail with satisfied reasons, which are excellent pain relieving effect, convenient administration, minor adverse event, generally satisfied and other. (NCT01060124)
Timeframe: Day 29

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Excellent pain relieving effectConvenient administrationMinor adverse eventGenerally SatisfiedOther
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-Fentanyl D-trans32244150

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Investigator's Overall Evaluation on the Pain Treatment

Investigator assessed the participants for satisfaction on pain treatment after the administration of the TTS-fentanyl D-trans as very satisfied, satisfied, average, dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. (NCT01060124)
Timeframe: Day 29

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very SatisfiedSatisfiedAverageDissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-Fentanyl D-trans1643901

[back to top]

Umbilical Vein Plasma Fentanyl Concentration (ng/mL)

Umbilical venous blood plasma was analyzed for fentanyl concentration (ng/mL) (NCT01074190)
Timeframe: Immediately after delivery

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Group 1.005
Group 2.03
Group 3.06
Total.03

[back to top]

Cumulative Fentanyl Dose (Micrograms)

Total cumulative dose of fentanyl in micrograms (NCT01074190)
Timeframe: Time of epidural catheter removal

Interventionfentalyl dose micrograms (Median)
Group 115
Group 278
Group 3139
Total78

[back to top]

Plasma Fentanyl Concentration (ng/mL)

Blood plasma fentanyl concentraton (nanograms/milliliter). (NCT01074190)
Timeframe: Time of epidural catheter removal

Interventionng/mL (Median)
Group 1.01
Group 2.07
Group 3.13
Total.07

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain

Postoperative pain will be measured at PACU using a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) from 0 to 10 VRS is a subjective measure in which individuals verbally rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) (NCT01114971)
Timeframe: one day

InterventionScore on scale 0-10 (Mean)
Fentanyl3.2
Labetalol3
Esmolol3.9

[back to top]

Return to Feeling Normal

Days to report to return to feeling normal, using follow up questionnaires (NCT01114971)
Timeframe: 1 month

InterventionDays (Mean)
Fentanyl11
Labetalol10
Esmolol12

[back to top]

Number of Participant With Opioid Consumption

n=Post discharge use of opioid consumption NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS WHO TOOK PAIN KILLER PILLS (NCT01114971)
Timeframe: 1 month

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fentanyl15
Labetalol14
Esmolol13

[back to top]

Low Appetite

Participant who experienced low appetite (follow up questionnaire) (NCT01114971)
Timeframe: 1 month

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fentanyl15
Labetalol7
Esmolol9

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction Using a Verbal Rating Scale From 0 to 10

Patient satisfaction using a verbal rating scale from 0 to 10 Where a VRS is a subjective measure in which individuals verbally rated their level of satisfaction on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (excellent satisfaction) to 10 (NCT01114971)
Timeframe: 1 month

Interventionscore on a scale (0-10) (Mean)
Fentanyl9.1
Labetalol9
Esmolol8

[back to top]

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Nausea and vomiting will be measured at PACU (NCT01114971)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fentanyl9
Labetalol4
Esmolol7

[back to top]

Conversion to General Anesthesia

Patients in which the procedure could not be completed without conversion to general anesthesia (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo6
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine1

[back to top]

Desaturation (Cumulative)

Cumulative time below saturation of 90% - the total number of seconds that the pulse oximeter reported a saturation below 90% (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

Interventionseconds (Median)
Placebo39
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine40

[back to top]

Desaturation (Longest)

Longest time below saturation of 90% (the number of seconds elapsed between the start of a period in which the pulse oximeter saturation fell below 90% and the return above 90%) (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

Interventionseconds (Median)
Placebo21
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine18

[back to top]

Endoscopist Satisfaction

Satisfaction rated by 10 point Likert scale (0 = Totally dissatisfied, 10 = Totally satisfied) (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: After the bronchoscopy procedure only

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo7
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine8

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Satisfaction rated by 10 point Likert scale (0 = Totally dissatisfied, 10 = Totally satisfied) (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: After the bronchoscopy procedure only

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Placebo9
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine10

[back to top]

Decreased Minute Ventilation

An initial baseline minute ventilation estimate was obtained via calibrated respiratory impedance plethysmography bands. Subsequent minute ventilation was normalized to this value. Values exceeding 100% were excluded from analysis, as these typically reflected a period of hyperpnea subsequent to relief of airway obstruction by chin lift or jaw thrust. (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

Interventionpercentage of baseline (Median)
Placebo0.736
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine0.764

[back to top]

Total Fentanyl

Total fentanyl dose delivered during the procedure (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: During the bronchoscopy procedure only, 58.5 minutes average

Interventionµg (Median)
Placebo112.5
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine68.75

[back to top]

Total Midazolam

Total midazolam delivered during procedure (NCT01158820)
Timeframe: Duration of procedure

Interventionmg (Median)
Placebo4.5
Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine2.75

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Received Rescue Medication for Analgesia During Dexmedetomidine Infusion

(NCT01159262)
Timeframe: During Study drug administration (6 to 24 hours)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Dexmedetomidine 0.05 mcg/kg35.7
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 mcg/kg35.7
Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg75

[back to top]

Total Amount of Rescue Medication Fentanyl Given for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)

(NCT01159262)
Timeframe: During study drug administration (6 to 24 hours)

InterventionMicrogram (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine 0.05 mcg/kg10.808
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 mcg/kg5.667
Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg9.522

[back to top]

Total Amount of Rescue Medication Midazolam Given for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)

(NCT01159262)
Timeframe: During Study drug administration (6 to 24 hours)

InterventionMilligram (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine 0.05 mcg/kg.360
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 mcg/kg.500
Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg1.125

[back to top]

Total Amount of Rescue Medication Morphine Given for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)

(NCT01159262)
Timeframe: During study drug administration (6 to 24 hours)

Interventionmilligram (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 mcg/kg0.275
Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg0.400

[back to top]

Weight-adjusted Total Amount (Per kg) of Rescue Medication Fentanyl Given for Analgesia During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)

(NCT01159262)
Timeframe: During study drug administration (6 to 24 hours)

Interventionmicrogram/Kg (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine 0.05 mcg/kg5.137
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 mcg/kg1.863
Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg2.725

[back to top]

Weight-adjusted Total Amount (Per kg) of Rescue Medication Midazolam Given for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)

(NCT01159262)
Timeframe: During study drug administration (6 to 24 hours)

Interventionmilligrams/Kg (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine 0.05 mcg/kg0.100
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 mcg/kg0.152
Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg0.318

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Received Rescue Medication Midazolam for Sedation During Dexmedetomidine Infusion

(NCT01159262)
Timeframe: During study drug administration (6 to 24 hours)

Interventionpercentage of subjects (Number)
Dexmedetomidine 0.05 mcg/kg7.1
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 mcg/kg7.1
Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg25

[back to top]

Time to Successful Extubation in DEX-exposed Subjects

(NCT01159262)
Timeframe: From start of DEX administration to extubation of each subject up to 7 days post-infusion

Interventionhour (Median)
Dexmedetomidine 0.05 mcg/kg22.9
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 mcg/kg49.3
Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg23.7

[back to top]

Weight-adjusted Total Amount (Per kg) of Rescue Medication Morphine Given for Analgesia During Dexmedetomidine Infusion (Among Who Used)

(NCT01159262)
Timeframe: During study drug administration (6 to 24 hours)

Interventionmilligram/Kg (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine 0.1 mcg/kg0.125
Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg0.109

[back to top]

FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale Scores

"FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale: each of the five categories (F) Face, (L) Legs, (A) Activity, (C) Cry, (C) Consolability is scored from 0-2, which results in a total score between 0 and 10.~0 = Relaxed and comfortable 1-3 = Mild discomfort 4-6 = Moderate pain 7-10 = Severe discomfort or pain or both" (NCT01188551)
Timeframe: 30 mins. post-op

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine w/ Midazolam5
Fentanyl w/ Midazolam3
Dexmedetomidine w/o Midazolam1
Fentanyl w/o Midazolam2

[back to top]

Recovery From General Anesthesia

Post-anesthesia recovery score: Aldrete The Aldrete scoring system takes into account the patient's ability to move, respiration, circulation, consciousness, and oxygen saturation. A maximum of two points are awarded in each category and a score of 9 or 10 is required for discharge. (NCT01188551)
Timeframe: 30 mins. post-op

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine w/ Midazolam8.67
Fentanyl w/ Midazolam9
Dexmedetomidine w/o Midazolam9.25
Fentanyl w/o Midazolam9.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sedation Within 4 Minutes

"Percentage of patients achieving a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale score less than or equal to 4, and the block procedure initiated, within 4 minutes of the administration of the first bolus of study drug. The Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale ranges from 0 (does not respond to deep stimulus) to 6 (agitated). The score of 4 equals lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone." (NCT01195103)
Timeframe: approximately 4 minutes after administration of first bolus of study drug

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
10 mg/kg Lusedra100
6.5 mg/kg Lusedra50
Placebo + Midazolam40

[back to top]

Maximum PAED Score

"Maximum score on the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence delirium scale. This has 5 items ranging from 1-4 and higher scores indicate greater emergence delirium.~1. eye contact with care giver ,score 1-4, purposeful actions 1-4, aware of surrounding 1-4,restless 1-4, inconsolable 1-4, Maximum score 20." (NCT01244126)
Timeframe: Upon arrival in the PACU, and at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and at discharge

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
IM Morphine6.1
IV Morphine6.3
Fentanyl IN4.6

[back to top]

Maximum Postoperative Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) Pain Score.

FLACC assigns 0-2 points for each of 5 categories (face, legs, activity, cry, consolability)and sums these points to give a total score where high scores indicate worse pain (Paediatr Anaesth 2006; 16: 258-65) (NCT01244126)
Timeframe: Upon arrival in the PACU, and at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes and at discharge

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
IM Morphine2.9
IV Morphine2.7
Fentanyl IN2.0

[back to top]

Median Time to Significant Analgesia (at Least 2 Units Decrease in Pain Level)

Median time (in minutes) to 2 units decrease in pain level after drug administration. Patients were asked to rate their pain at every 5 minutes intervals from 0 to 60 minutes post drug administration. The 10-point verbally administered numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to have patients rate their level of pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever). (NCT01270659)
Timeframe: 60 minutes

Interventionminutes (Median)
Low-FBT15.0
High-FBT20.0
Low Control15.0
High Control15.0

[back to top]

Nausea Level

"Subjects' nausea level was recorded to determine how fentanyl buccal tablet compares to standard therapy in causing nausea. Treatment induced nausea and severity of nausea level was assessed.~Nausea was assessed by a 10-point verbally administered scale. Patients rated their degree of nausea on a scale of 0 (no nausea) to 10 (worst nausea).~At the beginning of the study, literature review found relatively little evidence guiding objective means to rate nausea, but there was some precedent for this approach (Warden C. Prehospital use of ondansetron reduces nausea and episodes of vomiting in adults and children over 12 years old [abstract]. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007;11:132)." (NCT01270659)
Timeframe: every 5 minutes for the first 60 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low-FBT0
High-FBT0
Low Control0
High Control0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse Events

Occurrence of any adverse event. (NCT01270659)
Timeframe: Full 2 hours of the study period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Low-FBT1
High-FBT9
Low Control3
High Control10

[back to top]

Coughing

Data include patients who coughed irrespective of the degree of coughing. (NCT01277861)
Timeframe: Intraoperative period

InterventionParticipants, number (Number)
Fentanyl Pretreatment Group1
Saline Pretreatment Group6

[back to top]

Apnea

Apnea defined as no breathing for at least 30 s. (NCT01277861)
Timeframe: Induction of Anesthesia

InterventionParticipants, number (Number)
Fentanyl Pretreatment Group46
Saline Pretreatment Group30

[back to top]

Movement

The data provided below include participants who moved (includes all grades of movement ie, mild, moderate and severe). (NCT01277861)
Timeframe: Induction of Anesthesia

InterventionParticipants, number (Number)
Fentanyl Pretreatment Group8
Saline Pretreatment Group24

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Symptoms of Nausea and Vomiting Will be Compared Between the Two Groups

The number of participants who experience symptoms of nausea and vomiting in the two groups of patients will be recorded. This will be recorded during the follow-up phone call made 24-48 hours after the procedure. (NCT01315158)
Timeframe: 24-48 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Propofol+Benzo/Opioids2
Propofol Alone1

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Airway Maneuvers

In high risk patients (meeting at least of 1 of 3 criteria: ASA ≥ 3, BMI ≥ 30, those at risk for OSA) undergoing advanced endoscopy procedures, compare the number of participants who experience airway maneuvers (AMs) when sedated with propofol alone versus propofol in combination with benzodiazepines and opioids. (NCT01315158)
Timeframe: One day (during procedure)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Propofol+Benzo/Opioids4
Propofol Alone4

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Hypoxia

Defined by minimum oxygen saturation (SaO2) (NCT01327677)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours postoperatively

InterventionPercent Oxygen Saturation (Mean)
PRN Fentanyl95.8
PCA Fentanyl96.3

[back to top]

Mean Fentanyl Consumption

Amount of cumulative fentanyl consumed in mcg (NCT01327677)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours postoperatively

Interventionmicrograms/ hour (Mean)
PRN Fentanyl16.5
PCA Fentanyl26.4

[back to top]

Respiratory Depression

Defined by maximal End Tidal CO2 (mmHg) (NCT01327677)
Timeframe: Up to 24 hours postoperatively.

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
(Pro re Nata) PRN Fentanyl41.4
Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia (IVPCA) Fentanyl41.1

[back to top]

Respiratory Depression

Defined by minimum respiratory rate (breaths/minute). (NCT01327677)
Timeframe: up to 24 hours postoperatively

Interventionbreaths/minute (Mean)
PRN Fentanyl10.9
PCA Fentanyl10.5

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay

Participants will be followed for an expected average of 7 days in PICU and 10 days of hospitalization. This secondary endpoint is to be evaluated every six months. (NCT01333059)
Timeframe: From date of hospital admission to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 6 weeks

Interventiondays (Mean)
Experimental Group25.21
Control Group20.82

[back to top]

PICU Length of Stay

Participants will be followed for an expected average of 7 days. This secondary endpoint is to be evaluated every six months. (NCT01333059)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from PICU, assessed up to 1 month

Interventiondays (Mean)
Experimental Group13.93
Control Group9.82

[back to top]

Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Days

Participants will be followed for an expected average of 4 days. The Data Safety Monitoring Group will review the data every 6 months. (NCT01333059)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of discharge from PICU, assessed up to 1 month

Interventiondays (Mean)
Experimental Group10.14
Control Group5.82

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Observed by Their Nurse to Have Urinary Retention

Participant's nurse will be asked whether >400ml was obtained by straight cath (Y=1, No=0) (NCT01362998)
Timeframe: At 8, 24, 36 and 48 hours after Cesarean section

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
8 hours after the surgery24 hours after the surgery36 hours after the surgery48 hours after the surgery
Fentanyl Infusion0000

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Participants will be asked to rate their satisfaction on a 10 point Numerical Rating Scale (0=worst, 10=best). (NCT01362998)
Timeframe: At 8, 24, 48 and 36 hours after Cesarean section

Interventionscore on a scale (Number)
8 hours after the surgery24 hours after the surgery36 hours after the surgery48 hours after the surgery
Fentanyl Infusion10101010

[back to top]

Postsurgical Pain

Participants will be asked to rate their pain on a 10 point Numerical Rating Pain Scale, where zero is no pain and ten is the most intense pain possible. (NCT01362998)
Timeframe: At 8, 24 36 and 48 hours after the Cesarean section

InterventionUnits on a 10 point scale (Number)
8 hours post Cesarean section24 hours post Cesarean36 hours post Cesarean48 hours post Cesarean
Fentanyl Infusion3037

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Responded Yes to Having Pruritis

Participants will be asked whether they have pruritis (Yes=1, No=0) (NCT01362998)
Timeframe: At 8, 24, 36 and 48 hours after Cesarean section

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
8 hours after the surgery24 hours after the surgery36 hours after the surgery48 hours after the surgery
Fentanyl Infusion1111

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Required Additional Pain Medications

Participant's nurse will be asked whether the patient required additional pain medications (Yes=1, No=0) (NCT01362998)
Timeframe: At 8, 24, 36 and 48 hours after the Cesarean section

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
8 hours after the surgery24 hours after the surgery36 hours after the surgery48 hours after the surgery
Fentanyl Infusion0001

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Responded Yes to Having Back Pain

Participants will be asked whether they have back pain (Yes=1, No=0) (NCT01362998)
Timeframe: At 8, 24, 36 and 48 hours after the Cesarean section

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
8 hours after the surgery24 hours after the surgery36 hours after the surgery48 hours after the surgery
Fentanyl Infusion0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Observed by Their Nurse to Have Respiratory Depression

Participant's chart will be examined to determine whether the respiratory rate was <8 per minute (Yes=1, No=0) (NCT01362998)
Timeframe: At 8, 24, 36 and 48 hours after the Cesarean section

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
8 hours after the surgery24 hours after the surgery36 hours after the surgery48 hours after the surgery
Fentanyl Infusion0000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Responded Yes to Having Nausea or Vomiting

The patient will be asked whether she has nausea or vomiting (yes=1, no=0). (NCT01362998)
Timeframe: At 8, 24, 36 and 48 hours after the Cesarean section

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
8 hours after the surgery24 hours after the surgery36 hours after the surgery48 hours after the surgery
Fentanyl Infusion0000

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain

"Postoperative pain measured using a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), (90 minutes after arriving).~Postoperative pain VRS scores: 0 = none pain to 10 = intolerable pain." (NCT01368809)
Timeframe: one day

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Fentanyl1.5
Saline Solution1.5

[back to top]

Incidence of Nausea and Vomiting

Postoperative nausea and vomiting using a Verbal Rating Scale (0-10) at PACU (post-anesthesia care unit. (NCT01368809)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fentanyl2
Saline Solution4

[back to top]

Incidence of Coughing

during the perioperative period (insertion of an LMA device, maintenance of anesthesia, and emergence from general anesthesia) for ambulatory surgery procedures. (NCT01368809)
Timeframe: one day

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Fentanyl10
Saline Solution6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

The severity (intensity of each AE was assessed as mild (transient symptoms, no interference with daily activities), moderate (marked symptoms, moderate interference with daily activities), or severe (considerable interference with daily activities) by the investigator. Serious adverse events are defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death or is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. The investigator assessed each AE as either related or not related to study treatment. (NCT01429051)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AEAny AE reported as related to treatmentNon-serious adverse eventsSerious adverse eventsDeathsSevere adverse eventsAEs leading to withdrawalAEs possibly associated with nasal intolerabilityAEs with an onset within 30 minutes of first dose
Efficacy Phase645212203
Titration Phase2314222222211
Tolerability Phase22617857365

[back to top]

Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a ≥ 33% or 50% Reduction in Pain Intensity

"Overall responder rate is defined as the proportion of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes with a positive response to treatment. The following definitions of a positive response were analyzed: • Greater than 33% reduction in PI from time 0; • Greater than or equal to 50% reduction in PI from time 0. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is worst possible pain." (NCT01429051)
Timeframe: During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug

,
Interventionproportion of breakthrough pain episodes (Number)
> 33% reduction in PI at 5 minutes> 33% reduction in PI at 10 minutes> 33% reduction in PI at 30 minutes> 33% reduction in PI at 60 minutes≥ 50% reduction in PI at 5 minutes≥ 50% reduction in PI at 10 minutes≥ 50% reduction in PI at 30 minutes≥ 50% reduction in PI at 60 minutes
Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)0.230.440.550.580.110.310.490.52
Placebo0.170.240.340.480.070.210.310.34

[back to top]

Induction Phase: Pain Intensity Difference at 10 Minutes (PID10) After Treatment

"During the efficacy phase participants assessed their pain intensity at each breakthrough pain (BTP) episode at 0 and 10 minutes after first dose using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is worst possible pain. PID10 is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to 10 minutes. A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain; a ≥ 2-point difference is considered as clinically important." (NCT01429051)
Timeframe: During the efficacy phase (II), at each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0 and 10 minutes after first dose of study drug.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)2.5
Placebo1.4

[back to top]

Incidence of Improvement or Worsening in Nasal Mucosa Sign or Abnormality Score

Medical examination of the nasal cavity by rhinoscopy was performed by an oto-rhino-laryngologist before the start of study treatment and at 12 weeks. Signs and any abnormalities were observed for each nostril using the following 4 points assessment scale: • 0 =not present; • 1 =present in a mild degree; • 2 =present in a moderate degree; • 3 =present in a severe degree. A difference in score of 1 or more from Baseline to the end of treatment represented a worsening, while a negative value indicated an improvement of the observed clinical sign. The oto-rhino-laryngologist also assessed whether worsening of a sign was related to study drug. Assessments for both left and right nostrils are presented together. The incidence is calculated as the number of assessments (n) in the improvement or worsening category divided by the number of assessments with a non-missing score for the Nasal Mucosa or Abnormality assessment. Only those signs or abnormalities with n>0 were included (NCT01429051)
Timeframe: Baseline and at 12 weeks

Interventionproportion of nostril assessments (Number)
Change of color: ImprovementChange of color: WorseningChange of color: Worsening related to study drugInflammation: ImprovementInflammation: WorseningInflammation: Worsening related to study drugSore nose: ImprovementSore nose: WorseningSore nose: Worsening related to study drugUlceration: ImprovementUlceration: WorseningUlceration: Worsening related to study drugDry nose: ImprovementDry nose: WorseningDry nose: Worsening related to study drugRunny nose: ImprovementRunny nose: WorseningRunny nose: Worsening related to study drugStuffed nose: ImprovementStuffed nose: WorseningStuffed nose: Worsening related to study drugOedema: ImprovementOedema: WorseningOedema: Worsening related to study drugEpistaxis: ImprovementEpistaxis: WorseningEpistaxis: Worsening related to study drug
Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)0.060.090.090.040.070.070.040.040.04NA0.040.040.090.06NA0.040.130.100.060.170.080.040.170.080.020.020.02

[back to top]

Efficacy Phase: General Impression (GI) Score at 60 Minutes After First Dose

"Participants assessed their general impression (GI) of treatment efficacy for treated BTP episodes at 60 minutes after first dose of study drug. The validated, categorical 5-point Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) was used for this assessment and scored as follows:~0 =poor;~1 =fair;~2 =good;~3 =very good;~4 =excellent." (NCT01429051)
Timeframe: During the efficacy phase (II), at each episode of breakthrough pain, 60 minutes after first dose of study drug.

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)1.9
Placebo1.1

[back to top]

Efficacy Phase: Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID0-60 and SPID0-30) Derived From PI Scores

"The SPID30 and SPID60 represent the average improvement in pain intensity over the 30 minute interval and 60 minute interval, respectively. SPIDt was calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) for Pain Intensity Difference over the time interval 0 to t minutes, respectively, divided by the length of the time interval (t minutes). A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain.~Pain intensity was assessed at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is worst possible pain. PID is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point." (NCT01429051)
Timeframe: During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
SPID30SPID60
Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)0.60.7
Placebo0.40.5

[back to top]

Efficacy Phase: Proportion of BTP Episodes With a Positive Response Defined as a ≥ 1, 2 or 3 Point Reduction in Pain Intensity

"Overall responder rate is defined as the proportion of breakthrough pain (BTP) episodes with a positive response to treatment. The following definitions of a positive response were analyzed: • greater than or equal to 1 point reduction in pain intensity (PI) from time 0, • greater than or equal to 2 point reduction in PI from time 0, and • greater than or equal to 3 point reduction in PI from time 0. Pain intensity was assessed using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is worst possible pain." (NCT01429051)
Timeframe: During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug

,
Interventionproportion of breakthrough pain episodes (Number)
≥ 1 point reduction in PI at 5 minutes≥ 1 point reduction in PI at 10 minutes≥ 1 point reduction in PI at 30 minutes≥ 1 point reduction in PI at 60 minutes≥ 2 point reduction in PI at 5 minutes≥ 2 point reduction in PI at 10 minutes≥ 2 point reduction in PI at 30 minutes≥ 2 point reduction in PI at 60 minutes≥ 3 point reduction in PI at 5 minutes≥ 3 point reduction in PI at 10 minutes≥ 3 point reduction in PI at 30 minutes≥ 3 point reduction in PI at 60 minutes
Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)0.610.740.810.860.330.510.600.650.180.320.450.50
Placebo0.450.550.660.690.240.310.410.480.170.240.340.48

[back to top]

Efficacy Phase: Pain Intensity Difference (PID) at 5, 30, and 60 Minutes After First Dose of Study Drug

"During the efficacy phase participants assessed their pain intensity at each breakthrough pain (BTP) episode at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after first dose using the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 is worst possible pain. PID is calculated as the difference in pain intensity from time 0 to each time point. A positive value is a decrease (improvement) of the pain; a ≥ 2-point difference is considered as clinically important." (NCT01429051)
Timeframe: During the efficacy phase (II) each episode of breakthrough pain, at 0, 5, 30 and 60 minutes after study drug.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PID at 5 minutesPID at 30 minutesPID at 60 minutes
Intranasal Fentanyl Spray (INFS)1.33.03.3
Placebo0.81.82.2

[back to top]

Pain Score

pain diary using 0-10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable (NCT01472835)
Timeframe: through 6 hours after injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sedation2.2
Control3.4

[back to top] [back to top]

Satisfaction

5-point Likert scale. The scale is from 1-5. 1 being very unsatisfied and 5 being very satisfied. (NCT01472835)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sedation4.0
Control3.6

[back to top]

Oswestry Disability Index

Measure of functional capacity on a scale ranging from 0% to 100%, with 0% signifying no disability (NCT01472835)
Timeframe: 1-month

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sedation34.8
Control40.6

[back to top]

Pain Score

0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scale. 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain. (NCT01472835)
Timeframe: 1-month

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Sedation5.1
Control5.6

[back to top]

Presence of Bradycardia

Number of participants who had bradycardia (NCT01482091)
Timeframe: Every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after study drug administration

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Intranasal Saline0
Intranasal Fentnayl0

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score 20 Minutes After Administration of Study Drug

"Change in pain score between 0 and 20 minutes using the Wong Baker FACES pain scale (WBFPS). The WBFPRS has six faces, with each face representing an increasing severity of pain the more rightward it is on the scale (0 is the lowest score , which represents the least amount of pain, while 10 is the highest score which represents the greatest level of pain).. Each face has an even number underneath it, consecutively.~To calculate the change, the reported pain score at 20 minutes was subtracted from the reported baseline pain score. Thus, the higher change in pain score is indicative of a GREATER change in pain (i.e. greater decrease in pain at 20 minutes compared to baseline). The greatest possible changes in pain would be a 10 (pain score of 10 at baseline and 0 at 20 minutes) representing a DECREASE in pain between the two time points, and -10 (pain score of 0 at baseline and 10 at 20 minutes) representing a INCREASE in pain between the two time points." (NCT01482091)
Timeframe: Baseline and 20 minutes after administration of study drug

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Saline1
Intranasal Fentnayl2

[back to top]

Hypotension

Participants who had hypotension within 30 min of study drug administration (NCT01482091)
Timeframe: Every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after study drug administration

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Intranasal Saline2
Intranasal Fentnayl2

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score at 30 Minutes

"Change in pain score between 0 and 30 minutes using the Wong Baker FACES pain scale (WBFPS). The WBFPRS has six faces, with each face representing an increasing severity of pain the more rightward it is on the scale (0 is the lowest score, which represents the least amount of pain, while 10 is the highest score which represents the greatest level of pain).. Each face has an even number underneath it, consecutively.~To calculate the change, the reported pain score at 30 minutes was subtracted from the reported baseline pain score. Thus, the higher change in pain score is indicative of a GREATER change in pain (i.e. greater decrease in pain at 30 minutes compared to baseline). The greatest possible changes in pain would be a 10 (pain score of 10 at baseline and 0 at 30 minutes) representing a DECREASE in pain between the two time points, and -10 (pain score of 0 at baseline and 10 at 30 minutes) representing a INCREASE in pain between the two time points." (NCT01482091)
Timeframe: Baseline and 30 minutes after administration of study drug

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Saline2
Intranasal Fentnayl2

[back to top]

Hypoxia

Number of participants who had hypoxia within 30 min of study drug adminsitration (NCT01482091)
Timeframe: Every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after study drug administration

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Intranasal Saline0
Intranasal Fentnayl3

[back to top]

Change in Pain Score at 10 Minutes

"Change in pain score between 0 and 10 minutes using the Wong Baker FACES pain scale (WBFPS). The WBFPRS has six faces, with each face representing an increasing severity of pain the more rightward it is on the scale (0 is the lowest score , which represents the least amount of pain, while 10 is the highest score which represents the greatest level of pain).. Each face has an even number underneath it, consecutively.~To calculate the change, the reported pain score at 10 minutes was subtracted from the reported baseline pain score. Thus, the higher change in pain score is indicative of a GREATER change in pain (i.e. greater decrease in pain at 10 minutes compared to baseline). The greatest possible changes in pain would be a 10 (pain score of 10 at baseline and 0 at 10 minutes) representing a DECREASE in pain between the two time points, and -10 (pain score of 0 at baseline and 10 at 10 minutes) representing a INCREASE in pain between the two time points." (NCT01482091)
Timeframe: Baseline and 10 minutes after administration of study drug

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Intranasal Saline0
Intranasal Fentnayl2

[back to top]

Admission Rate

(NCT01482091)
Timeframe: This will be assessed at either discharge from the ED or admission to an inpatient unit, an expected average of 6 hours after triage

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Intranasal Saline16
Intranasal Fentnayl13

[back to top]

Time to Study Drug Administration

(NCT01482091)
Timeframe: Time from triage to adminstration of study drug

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Intranasal Saline47
Intranasal Fentnayl43

[back to top]

Respiratory Distress

Participants who had respiratory distress within 30 min of study drug administration (NCT01482091)
Timeframe: Every 5 minutes until 30 minutes after study drug administration

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Intranasal Saline0
Intranasal Fentnayl0

[back to top]

Presence of Headache

(NCT01482091)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of their ED visit, an expected average of 6 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Intranasal Saline0
Intranasal Fentnayl4

[back to top]

Physician Perceptions (Absolute Value)

Self-reported Physician/Endoscopist perceptions Measured via Visual Analog Scale [0-10] of: Highest pain, Average pain, Difficulty of procedure, Bowel preparation, Patient movement. A score of 0 on the scale=no pain/difficulty, while a score of 10=worst possible pain/difficulty/severity. The higher the score the worse the outcome. (NCT01488045)
Timeframe: Measured via physician survey within 30 minutes after the procedure

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Endoscopist rating: Highest PainEndoscopist rating: Average PainEndoscopist rating: Difficulty of ProcedureEndoscopist rating: Bowel preparationEndoscopist rating: Patient Movement
Midazolam/Fentanyl Intervention3.72.15.21.31.6
Propofol Intervention1.30.64.41.41.3

[back to top]

Patient Pain & Discomfort Rating (Absolute Value)

Self-reported by patient via a Visual Analog Scale [0-10], where 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain (NCT01488045)
Timeframe: "Survey administered in the recovery room up to 30 minutes following procedure (Recovery room), and a follow-up patient survey was carried out by telephone between 1 and 5 days postprocedure (1-5 d postprocedure)"

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Recovery room: patient highest painRecovery room: Average painRecovery room: Average discomfort during recovery1-5d postprocedure: Highest pain1-5d postprocedure: Average pain1-5d postprocedure: Average discomfort during recovery
Midazolam/Fentanyl Intervention2.41.91.21.90.71.7
Propofol Intervention0.20.80.70.160.40.17

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction Scores (Absolute Value)

Measured by the patient using a 100-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0-100%] with higher score indicating higher agreement with the statement/question. Higher agreement scores would indicate higher satisfaction (better outcome). (NCT01488045)
Timeframe: "Survey administered in the recovery room up to 30 minutes following procedure (Recovery room), and a follow-up patient survey was carried out by telephone between 1 and 5 days postprocedure (1-5 d postprocedure)"

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Recovery Room: Satisfaction with colonoscopyRecovery Room: Would undergo another colonoscopy with same sedationRecovery Room: Would encourage others to have same sedationRecovery Room: Comfort1-5 d postprocedure: Satisfaction with colonoscopy1-5d postprocedure: Would undergo another colonoscopy with same sedation1-5d postprocedure: Would encourage others to have same sedation1-5d postprocedure: Comfort
Midazolam/Fentanyl Intervention83.979.279.586.179.873.974.584.4
Propofol Intervention98.098.1100.088.898.798.298.294.7

[back to top]

Time Spent With a Total N-PASS Score >3 During DEX Infusion

The N-PASS score >3 indicates adequately sedated and not manifesting signs of pain/agitation. (NCT01508455)
Timeframe: Predose, loading dose (LD) 5 & 10mins/if LD is 20mins (5, 10, 15 & 20mins); maintenance infusion: 0 min, every 15mins (1st hr); every 30mins (2hrs), then hourly; within 5mins of DEX discontinuation; 5mins pre and post rescue medication

InterventionHours (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine0.44

[back to top]

Percent of Subjects Requiring Rescue Midazolam for Sedation

(NCT01508455)
Timeframe: During the study drug administration (ie., loading dose 10 or 20 minutes and maintenance infusion minimum of 6 hours up to 24 hours) and during the post drug administration (up to 24 hours).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Dexmedetomidine0

[back to top]

Amount of Rescue Medication for Analgesia During DEX Infusion

(NCT01508455)
Timeframe: During the study drug administration (ie., loading dose 10 or 20 minutes and maintenance infusion minimum of 6 hours up to 24 hours) and during the post drug administration (up to 24 hours).

Interventionmcg/kg (Number)
Dexmedetomidine1

[back to top]

Time to Successful Extubation

(NCT01508455)
Timeframe: From the start of study drug infusion to the study completion/withdrawal (Approximately 48 hours)

InterventionHours (Median)
Dexmedetomidine37.3

[back to top]

Incidence of Rescue Medication (Fentanyl or Morphine) Use for Analgesia During DEX Infusion

(NCT01508455)
Timeframe: During the study drug administration (ie., loading dose 10 or 20 minutes and maintenance infusion minimum of 6 hours up to 24 hours) and during the post drug administration (up to 24 hours).

Interventionparticipant (Number)
Dexmedetomidine1

[back to top]

Retention Rate

Retention rate is defined as the percentage of subjects able to complete the study. (NCT01515566)
Timeframe: Baseline to study completion, up to 100 minutes.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Fentanyl100
Placebo100

[back to top]

Effect of Fentanyl on Walk Distance

Ambulatory patients with breakthrough dyspnea performed a baseline 6 minute walk test (6MWT), and then received either subcutaneous fentanyl or placebo 15 minutes before a second 6MWT. The change in walk distance was documented between the first and second 6MWT. (NCT01515566)
Timeframe: Baseline 6 minute walk test (6MWT) to second 6MWT, up to 100 minutes for study participation.

,
Interventionfeet (Mean)
Walk Distance (Baseline Walk Test)Walk Distance (Second Walk Test)
Fentanyl397.7434.9
Placebo399417.9

[back to top]

Effect of Fentanyl Versus Placebo for Exercise-Induced and Breakthrough Dyspnea

"Participants receive either Fentanyl subcutaneous (SQ) 15 minutes before walking test, or Placebo (SQ) 15 minutes before walking test. During the study, trained research staff perform study assessments and monitor participant carefully throughout the study period. Six-minute walk tests were carried out following guidelines from the American Thoracic Society. The intensity of dyspnea at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 minute of each walk test were assessed using a validated numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no shortness of breath) to 10 (worst possible shortness of breath) and every 5 minutes during the rest period." (NCT01515566)
Timeframe: Baseline to 100 minutes for study participation.

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dyspnea at 0 minutes (Baseline walk test)Dyspnea at 6 minutes (Baseline walk test)Dyspnea at 0 minutes (Second walk test)Dyspnea at 6 minutes (Second walk test)
Fentanyl2614
Placebo3725

[back to top]

Traumatic Lumbar Punctures After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration

Traumatic lumbar puncture is defined as lumbar puncture in which cerebrospinal fluid contains at least 10 red blood cells (RBCs) per microliter and bloody lumbar as one in which the cerebrospinal fluid contained at least 500 red blood cells (RBCs) per microliter. (NCT01516684)
Timeframe: 20 minutes after lumbar puncture

,
InterventionTrials (Count of Units)
AtraumaticTraumaticBloody
Arm A (EMLA)6361
Arm B (Placebo)5754

[back to top]

Level of Movement (no Movement, Minor Movement, Major Movement, Other) After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration

(NCT01516684)
Timeframe: At the time of LP insertion

,
InterventionTrials (Count of Units)
No movementMinor movementMajor movementOther
Arm A (EMLA)507810
Arm B (Placebo)2912279

[back to top]

Total Dose of Propofol Administered to Each Patient

Analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed model regression methods. Raw mean total dose administered and raw percentage of times additional propofol was administered will be presented by sedation group treating each event (sedation with lumbar puncture) as the unit. T-test and chi-square tests will be performed as appropriate. (NCT01516684)
Timeframe: 20 minutes after sedation

Interventionmg/kg (Least Squares Mean)
Arm A (EMLA)2.94
Arm B (Placebo)3.22

[back to top]

Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, Post-LP Back Pain From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream

Each patient's parent (and/or the patient) will be contacted by telephone within one week of the lumbar puncture (or in person if the next clinic visit is within one week) to ask if the patient had any back pain after the lumbar puncture, and if they had any other complications. (NCT01516684)
Timeframe: Within one week of the LP

InterventionProbability of experiencing back pain (Mean)
Arm A (EMLA)0.211
Arm B (Placebo)0.250

[back to top]

Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, as Well as Post-LP Headache From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream

Each patient's parent (and/or the patient) will be contacted by telephone within one week of the lumbar puncture (or in person if the next clinic visit is within one week) to ask if the patient had any headache after the lumbar puncture, and if they had any other complications. (NCT01516684)
Timeframe: Within one week of the LP

InterventionProbability of experiencing headache (Mean)
Arm A (EMLA)0.194
Arm B (Placebo)0.289

[back to top]

Total Amount of Rescue Sedation (Midazolam)

Total amount of rescue sedation (midazolam) required from the start of IV sedation to completion of the procedure (NCT01519167)
Timeframe: During the treatment period, up to approximately 24 hours

Interventionmilligram (Mean)
NIDTP (n=0, 28)MIDTP (n=0, 20)Surgical procedures (n=0, 11)
Dose Level 22.621.702.45

[back to top]

Total Amount of Rescue Analgesia (Fentanyl)

Total amount of rescue analgesia (fentanyl) required from the start of IV sedation to completion of the procedure (NCT01519167)
Timeframe: During the treatment period, up to approximately 24 hours

Interventionmicrogram (Mean)
NIDTP (n=0, 6)MIDTP (n=0, 22)Surgical procedures (n=0, 12)
Dose Level 210.8361.86104.83

[back to top]

Time to First Dose of Rescue Midazolam From Start of Dexmedetomidine Infusion

Kaplan-Meier estimates of time in minutes to first dose of rescue midazolam from onset of study drug infusion (NCT01519167)
Timeframe: During the treatment period, up to approximately 24 hours

,
InterventionHours (Median)
NIDTP (n=1, 40)MIDTP (n=0, 25)Surgical procedures (n=0, 12)
Dose Level 1NANANA
Dose Level 223.520.0020.00

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Were Adequately Sedated at Least 80% of Time

Subjects who are adequately sedated (UMSS score of 1 to 3 or NPASS score of -5 to -2) at least 80% of the time sedated with the study drug (NCT01519167)
Timeframe: During the treatment period, up to approximately 24 hours

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NIDTP (n=1, 40)MIDTP (n=0, 25)Surgical procedures (n=0, 12)
Dose Level 1000
Dose Level 22172

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Have Undergone Procedures Without Artificial Ventilation or Intervention

(NCT01519167)
Timeframe: During the treatment period, up to approximately 24 hours

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NIDTP (n=1, 40)MIDTP (n=0, 25)Surgical procedures (n=0, 12)
Dose Level 1100
Dose Level 2371912

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Had Success in Sedation

"Success in sedation was defined by a combined endpoint which was the combination of the following:~Subject had adequate level of sedation (University of Michigan Sedation Scale [UMSS] score between 1 to 3 [minimally sedated to deeply sedated] or Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale [N-PASS] score between -5 to -2 [Light sedation]) at least 80% of the time the subject was given the study drug.~Subject had successfully completed the procedure without a need for rescue sedation (Midazolam).~Subject had undergone the procedure without artificial ventilation or intervention to restore baseline or normal hemodynamic status" (NCT01519167)
Timeframe: From baseline to end of post-treatment period (approximately 24 hours)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NIDTP (n=1, 40)MIDTP (n=0, 25)Surgical procedures (n=0, 12)
Dose Level 1000
Dose Level 2200

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Not Receiving Rescue Midazolam

Number of subjects who did not receive any rescue midazolam for sedation during the study drug infusion. (NCT01519167)
Timeframe: During the treatment period, up to approximately 24 hours

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NIDTP (n=1, 40)MIDTP (n=0, 25)Surgical procedures (n=0, 12)
Dose Level 1100
Dose Level 21251

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Converted to Alternative Sedation or Anesthetic Therapy Due to Failure of Treatment of Study Drug and Rescue Medication

(NCT01519167)
Timeframe: During the treatment period, up to approximately 24 hours

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
NIDTP (n=1, 40)MIDTP (n=0, 25)Surgical procedures (n=0, 12)
Dose Level 1000
Dose Level 2002

[back to top]

Frequency of Fentanyl Use for Analgesia

Frequency of rescue analgesia (fentanyl) required from the start of IV sedation to completion of the procedure. (NCT01519167)
Timeframe: During the treatment period, up to approximately 24 hours

InterventionOccurrence (Median)
NIDTP (n=0, 6)MIDTP (n=0, 22)Surgical procedures (n=0, 12)
Dose Level 2112.50

[back to top]

Frequency of Midazolam Required for Sedation

Frequency of rescue sedation (midazolam) required to maintain a subject within the target sedation range (UMSS score greater than 1 or N-PASS score less than -2). (NCT01519167)
Timeframe: During the treatment period, up to approximately 24 hours

InterventionOccurrence (Median)
NIDTP (n=0, 28)MIDTP (n=0, 20)Surgical procedures (n=0, 11)
Dose Level 2211

[back to top]

Marker of Myocardial Injury (Troponin I)

In a cohort of patients undergoing only coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=75), serum troponins will be measured postoperatively to determine whether methadone has a potential cardioprotective effect. (NCT01542645)
Timeframe: 12 hours after surgery

Interventionnanograms per millimeter (Median)
Methadone5.4
Fentanyl4.6

[back to top]

Chronic Postoperative Pain Scores-Weekly Frequency of Pain

0=< once per week; 1=once per week; 2=twice per week; 3=daily; 4=constant (NCT01542645)
Timeframe: 1 months after surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Methadone0
Fentanyl2

[back to top]

12 Months-Chronic Pain-weekly Frequency of Pain

0=< once per week; 1=once per week; 2=twice per week; 3=daily; 4=constant (NCT01542645)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Methadone0
Fentanyl0

[back to top]

6 Months-Chronic Pain-weekly Frequency of Pain

0=< once per week; 1=once per week; 2=twice per week; 3=daily; 4=constant (NCT01542645)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Methadone0
Fentanyl0

[back to top]

3 Months-Chronic Pain-weekly Frequency of Pain

0=< once per week; 1=once per week; 2=twice per week; 3=daily; 4=constant (NCT01542645)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Methadone0
Fentanyl0.5

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain Scores

Pain was assessed on a 11-point verbal analogue scale with 0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable (NCT01542645)
Timeframe: 2 hours after cardiac surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Methadone3
Fentanyl4.5

[back to top]

Total Opioid Consumption in the Postoperative Period

Total intravenous morphine used first three days (72 hours after ICU admission) (NCT01542645)
Timeframe: First 3 days after surgery

Interventionmilligrams (Median)
Methadone8
Fentanyl14

[back to top]

Number of Patients Satisfied With Analgesia Administered

"Number of patients satisfied with analgesia administered will be evaluated by determining the number of patients who report a Likert scale response of somewhat satisfied, very satisfied, or extremely satisfied (i.e. any patient who selects any of these three responses will be considered to have been satisfied with analgesia administered). Patients will be asked 10 minutes after procedure completion. If the patient is 8 years of age and older, both the patient and the parent or guardian will complete a satisfaction survey. If the patients is younger than 8 years, their parent or guardian will complete the satisfaction survey." (NCT01549002)
Timeframe: 10 minutes after procedure completion

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intranasal Fentanyl10
Intravenous Morphine4

[back to top]

Score on the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress Revised (OSBD-R)

Our primary outcome is the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress - Revised (OSBD-R) to assess observed intra-procedural pain. The total OSBD-R score is a summation of the OSBD-R score of each individual phase. The score in each phase can range from 0 to 23.5. There were four phases in our study, so the range of scores for the total OSBD-R was 0 to 94, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of pain and distress. The four phases in the study are (1) before analgesia administration, (2) ten minutes after analgesia administration but before beginning I&D, (3) immediately post I&D procedure (to ascertain the pain perceived during procedure), and (4) ten minutes after procedure completion. The scores documented here are the total OSBD-R scores. (NCT01549002)
Timeframe: Up to 10 minutes after the procedure completion

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl5.48
Intravenous Morphine18.92

[back to top]

Score on the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R)

"The Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) is a self-report measure of pain has strong validity and reliability in children 4 - 17 years of age undergoing painful procedures, and will be used to assess patients' self reported pain. A score of 0 means no pain, a score of 10 means very much pain. Therefore, a lower score indicates that a patient is experiencing a lower degree of pain intensity.~Patients will complete the FPS-R at four times during their medical encounter: (1) before analgesia administration, (2) ten minutes after analgesia administration but before beginning I&D, (3) immediately post I&D procedure (to ascertain the pain perceived during procedure), and (4) ten minutes after procedure completion." (NCT01549002)
Timeframe: Up to 10 minutes after procedure completion

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Before analgesia administration10 min after analgesia, before I&DImmediately post-I&D10 min after procedure completion
Intranasal Fentanyl6241
Intravenous Morphine44105

[back to top]

Post-operative Vomiting

(NCT01592708)
Timeframe: End of surgery to discharge from hospital

Interventionpercentage of subjects with POV (Number)
Intervention Cohort11
Comparison Cohort28

[back to top]

Post-operative Nausea

End of surgery time determined by anesthesia portion of the medical record. PONV to be assessed by review of surgeons' and nurses' notes in the medical record as well as through review of patient diaries. Vomiting constitutes a safety issue and, as such, associated adverse events will be noted. (NCT01592708)
Timeframe: End of surgery to discharge from hospital

Interventionpercentage of subjects with PON (Number)
Intervention Cohort24
Comparison Cohort70

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay

Anesthesia start time determined from anesthesia portion of the medical record. Time at which discharge order was placed will serve as time of discharge. (NCT01592708)
Timeframe: Anesthesia start time to placement of hospital discharge order - average 26 - 28 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Intervention Cohort26.4
Comparison Cohort28.2

[back to top]

Post-discharge Nausea

To be assessed based on patient diary completed daily for 1 week following discharge to home from the hospital (NCT01592708)
Timeframe: 1 week from discharge from hospital

Interventionpercentage of subjects with PDN (Number)
Intervention Cohort72
Comparison Cohort60

[back to top]

Post-discharge Vomiting

(NCT01592708)
Timeframe: 1 week post discharge

Interventionpercentage of subjects with PDV (Number)
Intervention Cohort22
Comparison Cohort29

[back to top]

Comparison of Postoperative Strength (Extension)

To assess extension force postoperatively to discern differences in muscle strength retention between continuous femoral nerve sheath catheter administration of fentanyl or Ropivacaine or a continuous IV infusion of fentanyl. (NCT01620047)
Timeframe: 24 hours post-surgery

InterventionNm/kg (Median)
Femoral Nerve Fentanyl.08
Femoral Nerve Ropivacaine.03
Intravenous Fentanyl With Placebo.05

[back to top]

Number of Participants Whose Newborns Received an APGAR Score of <=3 at 1 Min

Number of participants whose newborns received an APGAR score of <=3 at 1 min. A lower APGAR score represents poor health or a worsening in the Outcome, (NCT01621230)
Timeframe: At the time of Delivery, up to 3 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Epidural Fentanyl14
Epidural Bupivacaine Plus Fentanyl (Bupivacaine)11

[back to top]

Number of Participants Whose Newborns Received an APGAR Score of <=3 at 5 Min

Number of participants whose newborns received an APGAR score of <=3 at 5 minutes. A lower APGAR score represents poor health or a worsening in the Outcome (NCT01621230)
Timeframe: At the time of Delivery, up to 3 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Epidural Fentanyl2
Epidural Bupivacaine Plus Fentanyl (Bupivacaine)1

[back to top]

The Duration of the Second Stage of Labor

The length of the second stage of labor (measured as minutes a parturient spends in Stage II) in nulliparous women received a epidural bupivacaine plus fentanyl or fentanyl alone. (NCT01621230)
Timeframe: Duration of second stage of labor approximately 30 minutes to 150 minutes

Interventionminutes (Median)
Group I (Bupivacaine)75
Group II (No Bupivacaine)73

[back to top]

Time From Spinal Administration to Block Regression to the S1 Dermatome in Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

The time frame of the study for each patient only covers the period between time of surgery and time of discharge from the hospital, which is on the same day as the day of surgery (NCT01701102)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed for the duration of their recovery after surgery in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), an expected average of 2-4 hours.

Interventionminutes (Median)
Mepivacaine 37.5 mg203
Mepivacaine 30 mg Plus Fentanyl 10 µg195
Mepivacaine 27 mg Plus Fentanyl 10 µg156
Mepivacaine 24 mg Plus Fentanyl 10 µg159

[back to top]

O2 Saturation Post Drug Administration

After administration of the study drug, the subject is monitored (oxygen saturation), for any signs of respiratory depression or the presence of complications or side-effects including apnea or oxygen desaturation. (NCT01708122)
Timeframe: Baseline, 5 minutes 10 minutes and 30 minutes post drug-administration.

,
Interventionpercentage of O2 Saturation (Mean)
Baseline5 minutes10 Minutes30 Minutes
Fentanyl99.499.399.599.3
Placebo99.399.399.499.4

[back to top]

Pre Procedure 0 - 10 Pain Numerical Rating Scale

"The NRS pain assessment (0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain) is recorded as outlined below:~1. baseline pain score at admission, when the subject checks in, 2 Upon entry of the cystoscope into the urethral meatus, 3. and thirty minutes after the cystoscopic procedure has been completed." (NCT01708122)
Timeframe: Pre procedure, During procedure, Post procedure

,
Intervention0 - 10 Pain Numerical Rating Scale (Median)
Pre-procedureDuring procedurePost Procedure
Fentanyl070
Placebo050

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score at Day 30

The WOMAC is a self administered, participant health related questionnaire consisting of three subscales (pain, stiffness and physical function). Pain subscale score ranges from 0-100 mm (0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=extreme pain); stiffness subscale score ranges from 0-100 mm (0 mm=no stiffness to 100 mm=extreme stiffness) and physical function subscale ranges from 0-100 mm (0 mm=no difficulty to 100 mm=extreme difficulty). The overall WOMAC score is the sum of the 3 subscale scores which ranges from 0-300 mm (0 mm=none to 300 mm=extreme/worst). (NCT01742897)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 30

InterventionMillimeter (mm) (Median)
PainStiffnessPhysical functionOverall
TTS-Fentanyl-22.2-21.5-29.5-73.2

[back to top]

Pain Intensity at Day 30

Pain control was assessed by using a 10 cm VAS ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 cm=no pain and 10 cm=worse pain. (NCT01774903)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventioncm (Mean)
TTS-fentanyl4.89

[back to top]

Pain Intensity at Day 15

Pain control was assessed by using a 10 centimeter (cm) visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 cm=no pain and 10 cm=worse pain. (NCT01774903)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventioncm (Mean)
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-Fentanyl4.85

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Participant Global Assessment

Participants completed a global assessment with respect to pain control using a 9-point scale (-4 to 4; where, -4=100 percent worse, 0=unchanged and 4=100 percent improvement), safety using 5-point scale (1 to 5; where, 1=no, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe and 5=most severe side effects) and 5-point overall satisfaction scale (1-5; where, 1=no, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=good, 5=excellent). (NCT01774903)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Efficacy, 100 percent worseEfficacy, 75 percent worseEfficacy, 50 percent worseEfficacy, 25 percent worseEfficacy, unchangedEfficacy, 25 percent improvementEfficacy, 50 percent improvementEfficacy, 75 percent improvementEfficacy, 100 percent improvementSafety, noSafety, mildSafety, moderateSafety, severeSafety, most severeOverall satisfaction, noOverall satisfaction, mildOverall satisfaction, moderateOverall satisfaction, goodOverall satisfaction, excellent
TTS-fentanyl1021413111112156013101551

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Investigator Global Assessment

Investigator completed a global assessment of the participants treatment with respect to pain control using a 9-point scale (-4 to 4; where, -4=100 percent worse, 0=unchanged and 4=100 percent improvement), safety using 5-point scale (1 to 5; where, 1=no, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe and 5=most severe side effects) and 5-point overall satisfaction scale (1-5; where, 1=no, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=good, 5=excellent). (NCT01774903)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Efficacy, 100 percent worseEfficacy, 75 percent worseEfficacy, 50 percent worseEfficacy, 25 percent worseEfficacy, unchangedEfficacy, 25 percent improvementEfficacy, 50 percent improvementEfficacy, 75 percent improvementEfficacy, 100 percent improvementSafety, noSafety, mildSafety, moderateSafety, severeSafety, most severeOverall satisfaction, noOverall satisfaction, mildOverall satisfaction, moderateOverall satisfaction, goodOverall satisfaction, excellent
TTS-fentanyl01216611611715110681172

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Score at Day 15

The pain intensity was assessed by using a 10 centimeter (cm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 cm=no pain to 10 cm=worse pain. (NCT01774929)
Timeframe: Day 15

Interventioncm (Mean)
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-Fentanyl6.61

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Score at Day 30

The pain intensity was assessed by using a 10 cm VAS ranging from 0 cm=no pain to 10 cm=worse pain. (NCT01774929)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventioncm (Mean)
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-Fentanyl6.00

[back to top]

Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score at Day 15 and Day 30

The WOMAC is a self-administered; participant reported health status questionnaire designed to capture elements of pain, stiffness and physical impairment in participants with osteoarthritis. It consists of 24 questions (5 questions about pain, 2 about stiffness and 17 about physical function) scored on a VAS of 0 to 10 cm (0 cm=no pain to 10 cm=worse pain). Individual question responses are assigned a score of between 0=extreme and 4=none. Maximum scores for each element differ and therefore, scores were normalized. Total normalized score ranges from 0=worst to 100=best. (NCT01774929)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15 and Day 30

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineDay 15Day 30
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS)-Fentanyl17.0414.8413.41

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score: Participant

CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the Participant to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. (NCT01795898)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Very much worseMinimally worseNo changeMinimally improvedMuch improvedVery Much improved
Fentanyl1151433149

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score: Clinician

CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. (NCT01795898)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Very much worseNo changeMinimally improvedMuch improvedVery Much improved
Fentanyl151630151

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Score at Day 30

BPI is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions. BPI- severity consists of 4 questions (items) that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now). Each question (item) is answered on a scale ranging from 0 to 10; '0=No pain and 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine'. Measure can be scored by item, with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference. Change: Score at Day 30 minus score at Baseline. (NCT01795898)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 30

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline: WorstBaseline: LeastBaseline: AverageBaseline: Right nowChange at Day 30: WorstChange at Day 30: LeastChange at Day 30: AverageChange at Day 30: Right now
Fentanyl7.203.835.595.49-5.000-3.049-4.246-4.404

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Interference Score at Day 30

BPI is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions. BPI-interference consists of 7 questions (items) that assess impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each question (item) is answered on a scale ranging from 0 to 10; '0=No pain and 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine'. Measure can be scored by item, with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference. Change: Score at Day 30 minus score at Baseline. (NCT01795898)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 30

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline: General activityBaseline: MoodBaseline: Walking abilityBaseline: Normal workBaseline: Relationship w/othersBaseline: SleepBaseline: Enjoyment of lifeChange at Day 30: General activityChange at Day 30: MoodChange at Day 30: Walking abilityChange at Day 30: Normal workChange at Day 30: Relationship w/othersChange at Day 30: SleepChange at Day 30: Enjoyment of life
Fentanyl5.734.945.255.344.335.054.71-4.502-4.118-4.182-4.251-3.700-4.355-3.966

[back to top]

Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Medication

Rescue medications are periodic supplemental doses of analgesic which might be required to control pain. Tramadol 50mg tablet at a maximum of 6 tablets per day was used as standard rescue medication. (NCT01795898)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Fentanyl41

[back to top]

Time Spent Out of the Bed Per Day by the Participant

Participants were asked to enter the time in hours spend out of bed during the last 24 hours in the participant diary. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Baseline to Hour 24, Hour 24 to Hour 48 and Hour 48 to Hour 72

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline to Hour 24 (n= 126)Hour 24 to Hour 48 (n= 50)Hour 48 to Hour 72 (n= 26)
Fentanyl38.187.5146.7

[back to top]

Number of Hours Per Day With Average Pain Intensity Less Than or Equal to 4

Number of hours per day with average pain intensity less than or equal to 4 was measured on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10, 0=no pain; 4=mild pain; 10=strongest pain imaginable). If the participant was sleeping at time of measurement, pain intensity was assumed to be less than or equal to 4. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Baseline to Hour 24, Hour 24 to Hour 48 and Hour 48 to Hour 72

Interventionhours (Mean)
Baseline to Hour 24 (n=125)Hour 24 to Hour 48 (n= 57)Hour 48 to Hour 72 (n= 23)
Fentanyl21.322.222.7

[back to top]

Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Physician Questionnaire Responses

Physicians were asked to evaluate the IM for fentanyl-ITS (IONSYS) by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: Part2 D- Would you use IONSYS again, E- Would you prefer IONSYS to intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA); Part3 A- Was IM easy to understand, B- Did IM help you to use system properly. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Hour 72

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Part 2-Question D; YesPart 2-Question D; NoPart 2-Question D; MissingPart 2-Question E; YesPart 2-Question E; NoPart 2-Question E; MissingPart 3-Question A; YesPart 3-Question A; MissingPart 3-Question B; YesPart 3-Question B; Missing
Fentanyl83.35.611.177.811.111.188.911.188.911.1

[back to top]

Physician's Evaluation of Participant's Ability to Undergo Physiotherapy or Mobilization

Physicians were asked to rate the participant's ability to undergo physiotherapy or mobilization by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: Part 1 A- Does the surgical procedure performed allow the mobilization of the participant, C- Was the mobilization of the participant limited due to pain, D- Is the participant in a condition to undergo physiotherapy; Part 2 A- Was it possible to mobilize the participant sooner than with other pain therapies, B- Does the participant move more, C- Is the participant less afraid of moving. For Part 1-Question C, 'Partial' indicates that mobilization of participant was moderately limited due to pain. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Hours 24, 48 and 72

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Hour 24 Part 1-Question A; Yes (n=170)Hour 24 Part 1-Question A; No (n=170)Hour 24 Part 1-Question C; Yes (n=170)Hour 24 Part 1-Question C; No (n=170)Hour 24 Part 1-Question C; Partial (n=170)Hour 24 Part 1-Question C; Missing (n=170)Hour 24 Part 1-Question D; Yes (n=170)Hour 24 Part 1-Question D; No (n=170)Hour 24 Part 2-Question A; Yes (n=170)Hour 24 Part 2-Question A; No (n=170)Hour 24 Part 2-Question A; Missing (n=170)Hour 24 Part 2-Question B; Yes (n=170)Hour 24 Part 2-Question B; No (n=170)Hour 24 Part 2-Question B; Missing (n=170)Hour 24 Part 2-Question C; Yes (n=170)Hour 24 Part 2-Question C; No (n=170)Hour 48 Part 1-Question A; Yes (n=79)Hour 48 Part 1-Question A; No (n=79)Hour 48 Part 1-Question A; Missing (n=79)Hour 48 Part 1-Question C; Yes (n=79)Hour 48 Part 1-Question C; No (n=79)Hour 48 Part 1-Question C; Partial (n=79)Hour 48 Part 1-Question C; Missing (n=79)Hour 48 Part 1-Question D; Yes (n=79)Hour 48 Part 1-Question D; No (n=79)Hour 48 Part 1-Question D; Missing (n=79)Hour 48 Part 2-Question A; Yes (n=79)Hour 48 Part 2-Question A; No (n=79)Hour 48 Part 2-Question A; Missing (n=79)Hour 48 Part 2-Question B; Yes (n=79)Hour 48 Part 2-Question B; No (n=79)Hour 48 Part 2-Question B; Missing (n=79)Hour 48 Part 2-Question C; Yes (n=79)Hour 48 Part 2-Question C; No (n=79)Hour 48 Part 2-Question C; Missing (n=79)Hour 72 Part 1-Question A; Yes (n=36)Hour 72 Part 1-Question A; Missing (n=36)Hour 72 Part 1-Question C; Yes (n=36)Hour 72 Part 1-Question C; No (n=36)Hour 72 Part 1-Question C; Partial (n=36)Hour 72 Part 1-Question C; Missing (n=36)Hour 72 Part 1-Question D; Yes (n=36)Hour 72 Part 1-Question D; No (n=36)Hour 72 Part 1-Question D; Missing (n=36)Hour 72 Part 2-Question A; Yes (n=36)Hour 72 Part 2-Question A; No (n=36)Hour 72 Part 2-Question A; Missing (n=36)Hour 72 Part 2-Question B; Yes (n=36)Hour 72 Part 2-Question B; No (n=36)Hour 72 Part 2-Question B; Missing (n=36)Hour 72 Part 2-Question C; Yes (n=36)Hour 72 Part 2-Question C; No (n=36)Hour 72 Part 2-Question C; Missing (n=36)
Fentanyl95.34.716.539.443.50.691.88.230.662.47.154.144.71.258.841.292.42.55.18.951.932.96.388.66.35.140.553.26.368.425.36.363.331.65.191.78.35.652.830.611.186.12.811.141.747.211.158.330.611.161.127.811.1

[back to top]

Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Participant Questionnaire Responses

Participants were asked to evaluate the IM for IONSYS by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: A- Is IONSYS easy to use, B- Were you able to operate the system by yourself after receiving instructions, C- Have you found button yourself, D- Was pressing button easy, E- Have you heard system's beeps, F- Was IONSYS IM easy to understand, G- Did IM help you to use system, H- Did you have problems falling asleep, I- Could you move easily in bed, J- Did system bother you during physiotherapy, K- Do you perceive use of such system as modern treatment standard. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Hour 72

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Question A; YesQuestion A; NoQuestion A; MissingQuestion B; YesQuestion B; NoQuestion B; MissingQuestion C; YesQuestion C; MissingQuestion D; YesQuestion D; NoQuestion D; MissingQuestion E; YesQuestion E; NoQuestion E; MissingQuestion F; YesQuestion F; NoQuestionF; MissingQuestion G; YesQuestion G; NoQuestion G; MissingQuestion H; YesQuestion H; NoQuestion H; MissingQuestion I; YesQuestion I; NoQuestion I; MissingQuestion J; YesQuestion J; NoQuestion J; MissingQuestion K; YesQuestion K; NoQuestion K; Missing
Fentanyl77.11.221.877.61.221.278.821.277.61.221.272.94.722.475.91.822.475.90.623.530.046.523.560.617.122.44.171.224.775.31.822.9

[back to top]

Comprehensibility of the Information Material (IM): Nursing Staff Questionnaire Responses

Nursing staff were asked to evaluate the IM for IONSYS by responding to following questions of a questionnaire: IM A- Was IM easy to understand, B- Did IM help you to use system properly; IONSYS PCA A- Is system easy to handle, B- Did participant need help in using system, C- Do you feel confident using IONSYS; IV PCA- Are you experienced in using IV PCA; IONSYS PCA D- Could participant get mobilized sooner, E- Does participant move more, F- Is participant less afraid of moving, G- Were hospital logistics for IONSYS easier to handle. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Hour 72

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
IM-Question A; YesIM-Question A; MissingIM-Question B; YesIM-Question B; NoIM-Question B; MissingIONSYS PCA-Question A; YesIONSYS PCA-Question A; NoIONSYS PCA-Question A; MissingIONSYS PCA-Question B; YesIONSYS PCA-Question B; NoIONSYS PCA-Question B; MissingIONSYS PCA-Question C; YesIONSYS PCA-Question C; NoIONSYS PCA-Question C; MissingIV PCA-Question; YesIV PCA-Question; NoIV PCA-Question; MissingIONSYS PCA-Question D; YesIONSYS PCA-Question D; NoIONSYS PCA-Question D; MissingIONSYS PCA-Question E; YesIONSYS PCA-Question E; NoIONSYS PCA-Question E; MissingIONSYS PCA-Question F; YesIONSYS PCA-Question F; NoIONSYS PCA-Question F; MissingIONSYS PCA-Question G; YesIONSYS PCA-Question G; NoIONSYS PCA-Question G; Missing
Fentanyl97.12.995.91.22.995.31.82.923.573.52.990.05.94.184.110.65.331.248.820.052.932.414.747.637.614.771.812.415.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Rating at Hour 24, 48 and 72

Nursing staff asked the participants to rate their current pain intensity on 11-point NRS (range 0 to 10, 0= no pain; 10= strongest pain imaginable). (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Baseline, Hour 24, 48 and 72

Interventionunits on scale (Mean)
Baseline (n= 168)Change at Hour 24 (n= 157)Change at Hour 48 (n= 73)Change at Hour 72 (n= 31)
Fentanyl3.0-0.9-1.2-1.3

[back to top]

Post-Operative Phase (PPP33) Quality of Life Questionnaire Score

The PPP33 questionnaire has an overall score and 8 subscales that represent different aspects of the post-operative quality of life: information, autonomy, communication, physical complaints, pain, rest, fear and accommodation. Answers to individual question are scored with values 1 to 4. Summary scores are calculated by adding values for each question. Subscores ranges depend on the number of questions evaluated (2 to 7 questions). The overall score ranges from 1 to 100. Higher scores indicate less pain. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Hour 72

Interventionunits on scale (Mean)
Fentanyl76.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Global Assessment of Pain at Hour 24

Participants were asked to rate their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment on a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent). Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Hour 24

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
ResponseNo response
Fentanyl82.917.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Global Assessment of Pain at Hour 48 and 72

Participants were asked to give their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment using a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent). Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Hours 48 and 72

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Hour 48; Response (n= 79)Hour 48; No response (n= 79)Hour 48; Missing (n= 79)Hour 72; Response (n= 36)Hour 72; No response (n= 36)
Fentanyl86.112.71.397.22.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Nursing Staff Global Assessment of Pain

Nursing Staff were asked to give their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment using a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent). Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Hours 24, 48 and 72

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Hour 24; Response (n= 170)Hour 24; No response (n= 170)Hour 24; Missing (n= 170)Hour 48; Response (n= 79)Hour 48; No response (n= 79)Hour 72; Response (n= 36)Hour 72; Missing (n= 36)
Fentanyl87.112.40.688.611.497.22.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Physician Global Assessment of Pain

Physicians were asked to give their overall global assessment of pain therapy with study treatment using a 4-point verbal rating scale (poor, fair, good, excellent). Outcome of 'good' or 'excellent ' was recorded as Response while outcome of 'poor' or 'fair' was recorded as No response. (NCT01804673)
Timeframe: Hours 24, 48 and 72

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Hour 24; Response (n= 170)Hour 24; No response (n= 170)Hour 24; Missing (n= 170)Hour 48; Response (n= 79)Hour 48; No response (n= 79)Hour 72; Response (n= 36)Hour 72; No response (n= 36)
Fentanyl88.211.20.688.611.497.22.8

[back to top]

Proportion of Full-responder

Evaluation of the proportion of subjects who report full analgesia (full responders: FR). FR is operationally defined as a patient with a P.I.D. =/> 30% from visit 6 and visit 1 (NRS 0 to 10). (NCT01809106)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Morphine89
Oxycodone90
Buprenorphine95
Fentanyl88

[back to top]

Proportion of Non-Responder (NR) Participants

"Evaluation of the proportion of Non-Responder (NR) participants. NR correspond to the subjects who do not report any analgesic effects, with a P.I.D. (pain intensity difference) from visit 6 and visit 1 =/< 0%, (using a 0-10 NRS ). It includes the situations of average pain intensity stable or worsened at day 28 compared with baseline values." (NCT01809106)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Morphine14
Oxycodone18
Buprenorphine14
Fentanyl11

[back to top]

The Opioid Escalation Index

The proportion of subjects with an increase of opioid daily dose > 5% compared with the basal dosage (OEI%). (NCT01809106)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Morphine13
Oxycodone24
Buprenorphine18
Fentanyl45

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Total Pain Relief Score (TOTPAR4) at Four Hours After Treatment Initiation.

Primary outcome is total pain relief score (TOTPAR4) at 4 hours after treatment initiation. TOTPAR4 defined as the sum of hourly pain relief scores after baseline to four hours after the first administered dose of Lazanda or placebo. Scores range from -1 (worse pain) to 4 (complete relief). Range of possible TOTPAR4 summed scores is -4 to 16. A TOTPAR4 score greater than or equal to 8 is considered a positive response. (NCT01812759)
Timeframe: 4 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Placebo1
Intervention1
No Medication0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Participant's Global Assessment

Participants global assessment with respect to pain control using a 9-point scale (-4 to 4; where, -4=100% worse, 0=unchanged and 4=100% improvement), safety using 5-point scale (1 to 5; where, 1=no, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe and 5=most severe side effects) and 5-point overall satisfaction scale (1-5; where, 1=no, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=good, 5=excellent). Number of participants with participant's global assessment with respect to efficacy, safety and overall satisfaction were reported. (NCT01816243)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Efficacy, 100% Worse (n=34)Efficacy, 75% Worse (n=34)Efficacy, 50% Worse (n=34)Efficacy, 25% Worse (n=34)Efficacy, Unchanged (n=34)Efficacy, 25% Improve (n=34)Efficacy, 50% Improve (n=34)Efficacy, 75% Improve (n=34)Efficacy, 100% Improve (n=34)Safety, No (n=27)Safety, Mild (n=27)Safety, Moderate (n=27)Safety, Severe (n=27)Safety, Most severe (n=27)Overall Satisfaction, No (n=27)Overall Satisfaction, Mild (n=27)Overall Satisfaction, Moderate (n=27)Overall Satisfaction, Severe (n=27)Overall Satisfaction, Most Severe (n=27)
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS) - Fentanyl1021413111116920017685

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment

Investigator would complete a global assessment of the participants treatment with respect to pain control using a 9-point scale (-4 to 4; where, -4=100 percent (%) worse, 0=unchanged and 4=100% improvement), safety using 5-point scale (1 to 5; where, 1=no, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe and 5=most severe side effects) and 5-point overall satisfaction scale (1-5; where, 1=no, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=good, 5=excellent). Number of participants with Investigator's assessment with respect to efficacy, safety and overall satisfaction were reported. (NCT01816243)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Efficacy, 100% WorseEfficacy, 75% WorseEfficacy, 50% WorseEfficacy, 25% WorseEfficacy, UnchangedEfficacy, 25% ImproveEfficacy, 50% ImproveEfficacy, 75% ImproveEfficacy, 100% ImproveSafety, NoSafety, MildSafety, ModerateSafety, SevereSafety, Most severeOverall Satisfaction, NoOverall Satisfaction, MildOverall Satisfaction, ModerateOverall Satisfaction, SevereOverall Satisfaction, Most Severe
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS) - Fentanyl00107264716920017685

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Rating at Day 15

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); score ranges from 0 to 10 where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain. (NCT01816243)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 15

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS) - Fentanyl-1.56

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Rating at Day 30

Pain intensity was assessed on 11-point NRS; score ranges from 0 to 10 where 0=no pain and 10=worst pain. (NCT01816243)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 30

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Transdermal Therapeutic System (TTS) - Fentanyl-1.95

[back to top]

Dyspnea Borg Scale

"Assessed dyspnea using the modified Dyspnea Borg Scale that ranges from 0 (no shortness of breath) to 10 (worst possible shortness of breath). Measured the mean difference of modified Dyspnea Borg scale between the first and second 6 Minute Walk Tests and between the first and third 6 Minute Walk Tests." (NCT01832402)
Timeframe: 1.5 to 2 hours on a Single visit

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Mean difference between 1st and 2nd walk testsMean difference between 1st and 3rd walk tests
Controlled Group (Placebo)-1.7-2.4
Intervention Group (Fentanyl Pectin Nasal Spray)-1.8-1.7

[back to top]

Dyspnea Numeric Rating Scale

"Our primary outcome was dyspnea intensity now using a dyspnea numeric rating scale that ranges from 0 (no shortness of breath) to 10 (worst possible shortness of breath). Measured the mean difference of dyspnea numeric rating scale between the first and second 6 Minute Walk Tests and between the first and third 6 Minute Walk Tests. 6 minute walk tests were carried out following guidelines from the American Thoracic Society." (NCT01832402)
Timeframe: 1.5 to 2 hours on a Single visit

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Mean difference between 1st and 2nd walk testsMean difference between 1st and 3rd walk tests
Controlled Group (Placebo)-1.7-2.5
Intervention Group (Fentanyl Pectin Nasal Spray)-2.0-2.3

[back to top]

Walk Distance at 6 Minutes

Compared the mean difference of distance between the first and second 6 Minute Walk Tests and between the first and third 6 Minute Walk Tests. (NCT01832402)
Timeframe: 1.5 to 2 hours on a Single visit

,
Interventionmeters (Mean)
Mean difference between 1st and 2nd walk testsMean difference between 1st and 3rd walk tests
Control Group (Placebo)16.314.6
Interventional Group (Fentanyl Pectin Nasal Spray)23.823.3

[back to top]

Preserved Neurological Examination.

Neurological status using modified NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale, between 0 and 4, with 0 being normal functioning and 4 being completely impaired. (NCT01845441)
Timeframe: Up to 8 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Dexmedetomidine Arm19
Control Arm18.5

[back to top]

Numbers of Patient Movements (Events) That Delay or Adversely Affect the Procedure Performance and Safety.

Patient will be continuously monitored for movements that delays or adversely affect the performance of the procedure by the patient assessor in a safe and timely manner (an event). One minute interval between patient event assessments will be given to prevent subjective bias. After every one minute, it will be determined if an event has occurred. Over the length of the procedure, the total number of one-minute intervals with an event occurrence will be summed and then divided by the total of minutes in the procedure to obtain a standardized value as the primary outcome. This will allow for direct comparison of values across the procedures of varying length. This approach will be more systematic and more easily replicable than counting events directly, which requires interpretation as to when a movement event begins and ends, which can be difficult and more subjective. (NCT01845441)
Timeframe: Primary outcome will be assessed during the procedure, up to 4 hours.

InterventionEvents (Median)
Dexmedetomidine Arm30
Control Arm36

[back to top]

Maintenance of Optimal Sedation Target in Both Groups.

Both arms will be assessed by the patient assessor with RASS score measurement at baseline and every 20 minutes thereafter for the length of the procedure (up to 8 hours) and then averaged together to get one over all score . In the Dexmedetomidine arm the drug will be titrated by 0.1mcg/Kg/hour by the treating physician clinical judgment, in order to achieve and maintain RASS of 0 - 1. In the control arm the drug adjustment will not be based on the RASS score, but by physician discretion only. It is a 10-point scale to determine sedation, with a score from +4 (very combative, violent, dangerous to staff) to -5 (unarousable, no response to voice or physical stimulation). (NCT01845441)
Timeframe: Up to 8 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Dexmedetomidine Arm-1
Control Arm0

[back to top]

Maternal Systolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure will be measured at different timepoints. (NCT01846221)
Timeframe: Baseline, 30 Minutes post epidural administration

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline30 Minutes
Clonidine123116
Fentanyl121118

[back to top]

Neonatal Apgar Score

The Apgar score is based on a total score of 1 to 10. The higher the score, the better the baby is doing after birth. A score of 7, 8, or 9 is normal and is a sign that the newborn is in good health. (NCT01846221)
Timeframe: 1 minute and 5 minutes post delivery

,
InterventionApgar score (Mean)
1 Minute5 Minutes
Clonidine8.538.94
Fentanyl8.248.88

[back to top]

Number of Spontaneous Vaginal Deliveries

Mode of delivery: spontaneous vaginal or instrumental vaginal versus cesarean. (NCT01846221)
Timeframe: Upon delivery (approximately up to 8 hours from baseline)

Interventionspontaneous vaginal deliveries (Number)
Clonidine38
Fentanyl40

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Success Rate at 15 Minutes Post-epidural Bolus Injection

Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was evaluated every 5 min for 15 min. 'Success' is defined as at least a 4-point reduction in VAS at 15 min. (0=no pain, 10= worst pain) (NCT01846221)
Timeframe: Baseline, 15 Minutes post epidural administration

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Clonidine31
Fentanyl38

[back to top]

Maternal Heart Rate

Heart rate will be measured at different timepoints. (NCT01846221)
Timeframe: Baseline, 30 Minutes post epidural administration

,
Interventionbeats per minute (BPM) (Mean)
Baseline30 Minutes
Clonidine8784
Fentanyl8485

[back to top]

Acute Pain Following Sub-Arachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) is the Primary Outcome Variable and Will be Assessed Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).

Pain score 0-10. 0 represented no pain and 10 worst pain (NCT01851720)
Timeframe: 4 days

Intervention ()
Control Group / Standard of Care0
Low Dose IV Fentanyl PCA0

[back to top]

Walk Distance at 6 Minutes

Measured the mean difference between the baseline walk test and second 6 minute walk test. (NCT01856114)
Timeframe: Baseline to 30 minutes

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Intervention Group (Fentanyl Buccal Tablet)-1
Controlled Group (Placebo)6.7

[back to top]

Dyspnea Borg Scale

"Assessed dyspnea using the 0-10 modified Dyspnea Borg Scale at baseline walk test and after second 6 minute walk test. The Borg scale ranges from 0 (no shortness of breath) to 10 (worst possible shortness of breath). Measured the mean difference between the baseline walk test and second 6 minute walk test." (NCT01856114)
Timeframe: Baseline to 30 minutes

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intervention Group (Fentanyl Buccal Tablet)-1.6
Controlled Group (Placebo)-0.5

[back to top]

Dyspnea Numeric Rating Scale

"Our primary outcome was dyspnea intensity now using a dyspnea numeric rating scale that ranges from 0 (no shortness of breath) to 10 (worst possible shortness of breath). Measured the mean difference between the baseline and second 6 minute walk test. 6 minute walk tests were carried out following guidelines from the American Thoracic Society." (NCT01856114)
Timeframe: Baseline to 30 minutes

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intervention Group (Fentanyl Buccal Tablet)-2.4
Controlled Group (Placebo)-1.1

[back to top]

Time of Achieving Discharge Readiness

Documented time that patient achieves an Aldrete Score of 9 -10. This is a standardized scale used to assess discharge readiness at Texas Children's Hospital. (NCT02056288)
Timeframe: From the time of PACU arrival up to time the patient achieves an Aldrete Score of 9- 10.

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block72
IV Opioids94

[back to top]

Patient and Parent Satisfaction

Child subject and parent satisfaction with pain management was measured using the global perioperative experience graded on a numeric scale of 0 - 10, with 0 indicating poor management to 10 indicating excellent pain management. Satisfaction is reported at 12-, 24-, 48-hours, and overall at home. (NCT02056288)
Timeframe: up to 48 hours after surgery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Child's Satisfaction - at 12-hoursChild's Satisfaction - at 24-hoursChild's Satisfaction - at 48-hoursChild's Satisfaction - Total time at homeParent's Satisfaction - at 12-hoursParent's Satisfaction - at 24-hoursParent's Satisfaction - at 48-hoursParent's Satisfaction - Total time at home
IV Opioids6.65.67.15.97.16.57.66.5
Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block5.85.67.56.15.86.48.17.9

[back to top]

Incidence of Side Effects

Documented side effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and respiratory depression. (NCT02056288)
Timeframe: up to 48 hours after surgery

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NauseaVomitingPruritusRespiratory Depression
IV Opioids0000
Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block1002

[back to top]

The Mean Pain Score in the Postoperative Period

The Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) asks patients to verbally state a number between 0 and 10 that corresponds to their present pain intensity. 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain ever. Pain was measured by the child subject in the PACU at arrival, 15-, 30-, 60- and 120-minutes. Pain was assessed by the child subject and a parent at home at 12-, 24-, and 48-hours after surgery. The results represent a mean of all verbal pain scores in the PACU, while at home, and overall. (NCT02056288)
Timeframe: From admission to PACU to 48 hours after surgery

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PACUHomePACU + Home
IV Opioids4.763.494.44
Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block1.283.852.46

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

Opioid administration measured in mg/kg. Results below represent the total opioids given in the PACU, after discharge from the PACU, and then total post-operative period. (NCT02056288)
Timeframe: up to 48 hours after surgery

,
Interventionmg/kg (Median)
Total Intraoperative OpioidsPACU - 1st 2 hoursHome - Hour 2 to 48Total Opioid Consumption - PACU and Home
IV Opioids0.20.120.040.26
Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block000.250.31

[back to top]

Time of First Analgesia Request

Time at which additional analgesia was requested and/or administered by the nurse while in the PACU. Discharge data not reported due to poor diary return compliance. (NCT02056288)
Timeframe: PACU Period up to 3 hours

InterventionMinutes (Median)
Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Block76
IV Opioids27

[back to top]

Quality of Patient Positioning

We estimate quality of patient positioning (0=not satisfactory, 1=satisfactory, 2=good, 3=optimal) during spinal anesthesia between two groups. (NCT02150759)
Timeframe: average 10-20 minutes during spinal anesthesia

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lateral position72104134Lateral position72104135Hip flexion72104134Hip flexion72104135Spinal block72104134Spinal block72104135
2013
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine2
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl15
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine9
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine3
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl5
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine6
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine5
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine8
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl0
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine1
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl3
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine7
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl13

[back to top]

Pain Score Using Five Scales

We want to compare pain score (five scales; 0=calm, 1=facial grimacing, 2=moaning, 3=screaming, 4=restlessness or agitation, unable to proceed) when patients are lateral position during spinal anesthesia. (NCT02150759)
Timeframe: average 10-20 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lateral position72104134Lateral position72104135Hip flexion72104134Hip flexion72104135Spinal blodk72104134Spinal blodk72104135
02341
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine15
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine5
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl5
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl16
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl1
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl6
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine1
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl14
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl0
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine17
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl11
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine2
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl8
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine3
Dexmedetomidine-fentanyl2
Dexmedetomidine-ketamine0

[back to top]

Mean Change in Visual Analog Scale for Pain

Mean change of her pain relief from the spinal epidural 60 minutes after she received it, using a VAS, scored from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating more pain. (NCT02159807)
Timeframe: baseline and 60 minutes

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
1.25 mg Bupivacaine0.43
1.66 mg Bupivacaine0.46
2.5 mg Bupivacaine0.26

[back to top]

Maternal Blood Pressure

Maternal diastolic blood pressure at 60 minutes after epidural to measure maternal hypotension (NCT02159807)
Timeframe: at 1 hour

Interventionmm/Hg (Mean)
1.25 mg Bupivacaine78.2
1.66 mg Bupivacaine79.58
2.5 mg Bupivacaine80.52

[back to top]

Fetal Heart Rate at 1 Hour

Baby's heart rate recorded with the external monitor that is placed on patient's belly, for a duration of 60 minutes after the placement of the combined spinal epidural. (NCT02159807)
Timeframe: at 1 hour

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
1.25 mg Bupivacaine134.73
1.66 mg Bupivacaine137.64
2.5 mg Bupivacaine135.57

[back to top]

Total Propofol Dosage

total propofol dosage = propofol dose from start to end of the operation (NCT02174913)
Timeframe: From start anesthesia to finish operation

Interventionmg (Mean)
Bispectral Index2,146
Clinical Signs2,340

[back to top]

Extubation Time

Awakening time from finished operation to endotracheal extubation. (NCT02174913)
Timeframe: 4 hr

Interventionmin (Mean)
Bispectral Index16.3
Clinical Signs16.6

[back to top]

Readmission or Emergency Department (ED) Visit Due to Pain Control Within 30 Days

(NCT02197273)
Timeframe: Date of discharge through 30 days following discharge

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Standard of Care Analgesia2
Liposomal Bupivacaine4

[back to top]

Length of Stay in Hospital (Days)

(NCT02197273)
Timeframe: Participants were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Standard of Care Analgesia2.0
Liposomal Bupivacaine2.0

[back to top]

Time to Post-operative Rescue Opioids (Hours)

(NCT02197273)
Timeframe: Immediately following discharge from operating room until the participant was discharged from the hospital, an expected average of 3 days

Interventionhours (Median)
Standard of Care Analgesia7.7
Liposomal Bupivacaine11.8

[back to top]

Mortality

Number of patients who die within 28 days after randomization (NCT02203019)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Propofol8
Dexmedetomidine9

[back to top]

Duration of MICU Stay

Number of days patient stays in the MICU (NCT02203019)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days

Interventiondays (Median)
Propofol6
Dexmedetomidine5

[back to top]

Duration of Vasopressor Support

Number of days the patient requires intravenous vasopressors (NCT02203019)
Timeframe: Up to 28 Days

Interventiondays (Median)
Propofol0
Dexmedetomidine2

[back to top]

Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

Number of days patient requires mechanical ventilation (NCT02203019)
Timeframe: Up to 28 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Propofol5
Dexmedetomidine3

[back to top]

Muscle Afferent Affect

Corticospinal responsiveness will be quantified before and after exercise. (NCT02209610)
Timeframe: 1 minute after exercise on study day

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Patients With Heart Failure: Neuromuscular Abnormalities-30
Health Control Subjects and Neuromuscular Function10

[back to top]

Maximal Voluntary Quadriceps Force [% Change From Baseline]

Following dynamic single leg knee extension exercise for a given duration (4-8 min), the decline in maximal voluntary contraction force will be measured. (NCT02209610)
Timeframe: 1 minute after exercise on study day

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Patients With Heart Failure: Neuromuscular Abnormalities-30
Health Control Subjects and Neuromuscular Function-5

[back to top]

Quadriceps Twitch Force and Voluntary Activation (% Change From Baseline)

During a 2-min maximal voluntary quadriceps contraction, central and peripheral fatigue will develop progressively and significantly more in HF vs. CTRLs. (NCT02209610)
Timeframe: During (20 second intervals) and 1 minute after exercise on study day

,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Twitch forceVoluntary activation [VA]
Health Control Subjects and Neuromuscular Function-35-20
Patients With Heart Failure: Neuromuscular Abnormalities-60-25

[back to top]

Pain Relief

Patients suffering from burn injuries will receive sublingual fentanyl spray (Subsys) to address procedural pain (dressing changes/minor debridement). It will be compared with a standard treatment regimen of oral morphine. The hypothesis is that the fentanyl spray will be more effective for the treatment of procedural pain in patients with burn injury. (NCT02241486)
Timeframe: 60 min

Intervention ()
Sublingual Fentanyl Spray0

[back to top]

Pain Relief Within First 30 Postoperative Days

"Daily pain self-assessments using a numeric (0-10) rating scale were recorded in a home diary for approx 30 days following surgery (from hospital discharge until postop clinic visit). Zero was no pain and 10 was the worst possible pain.~Patient's 30-day post-discharge scores were averaged individually and compared in between groups.~In addition, participants recorded pain interference with 7 activities of daily living - mood, ability to walk or move, sleep, normal work outside the home, normal work at home, recreational activities, and enjoyment of life on a 5-point Likert scale. Questions were based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Behavior and Pain Interference item banks. Patients also recorded opioid and nonopioid analgesic use, sedation, and time to return to work." (NCT02300077)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Control1
Treatment Methadone 0.1 mg/kg1
Treatment Methadone 0.15 mg/kg0

[back to top]

Intraoperative Opioid Administration

Data on opioids administered intraoperatively will be collected from the subject's EMR. (NCT02300077)
Timeframe: Administered at induction of anesthesia

Interventionmorphine equivalents mg (Median)
Control25
Treatment Methadone 0.1 mg/kg5.6
Treatment Methadone 0.15 mg/kg8.6

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption Within First 30 Postoperative Days

Daily opioid consumption for approx 30 days following surgery (from hospital discharge until postop clinic visit). (NCT02300077)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventiontotal postdischarge opioid pills used (Median)
Control10
Treatment Methadone 0.1 mg/kg7
Treatment Methadone 0.15 mg/kg5

[back to top]

Postoperative Opioid Administration

Data on opioids administered postoperatively will be collected from the subject's EMR. Pain severity will be assessed using Numeric Rating Scale and colored-visual analogue scale. Pain relief postoperatively will be assessed using a 5 point scale [0-no relief, 4-complete relief] (NCT02300077)
Timeframe: EMR reviewed at 24 hours post-administration or at hospital discharge

Interventionmorphine equivalents mg (Median)
Control10
Treatment Methadone 0.1 mg/kg5.4
Treatment Methadone 0.15 mg/kg3.3

[back to top]

Stress Hormone Levels-ACTH, GH, Glucagon (pg/ml)

Adreno-corticotrophic hormone (ACTH), Growth Hormone (GH) and Glucagon (measured as pg/ml) taken at: Prebypass, cardiopulmonary bypass (2 samples: 30 mins after start of bypass (CPB 30) and end of bypass (CPB END), post-bypass and ICU 8 hours postoperative period (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: Perioperative period (Intraoperatively and 8 hours postoperatively)

,
Interventionpg/ml (Median)
ACTH pre-bypassACTH CPB-30ACTH CPB-ENDACTH post-bypassACTH 8-hrGH-Pre-bypassGH-CPB-30GH-CPB-ENDGH-post-bypassGH-8HRGlucagon pre-bypassGlucagon CPB-30Glucagon CPB-EndGlucagon post-bypassGlucagon 8-HR
Fentanyl Group7.457.830.749.141.38723202254544612696192338481408459
Remifentanil Group7.44.44.48.077.0495826947373643658229259401315570

[back to top]

Postoperative Blood Glucose

Mean and peak blood glucose levels postoperatively (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: From ICU Admission (After Surgery) Until 24 hours postoperatively

,
Interventionmg/dl (Median)
Mean Postoperative Blood GlucosePeak Postoperative Blood Glucose
Fentanyl Group139175
Remifentanil Group139185

[back to top]

Mean, Peak and Trough Intraoperative Blood Glucose (mg/dl)

Blood glucose measured every hour (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: Intraoperative period; Induction to end of surgery

,
InterventionMg/dL (Median)
Mean Introperative Blood GlucosePeak Intraoperative Blood GlucoseLowest Intraoperative Blood Glucose
Fentanyl Group156205120
Remifentanil Group141178117

[back to top]

Inflammatory Mediator Levels, Interleukin-1b, Interleukin 6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) (pg/ml)

Inflammatory mediator levels, Interleukin-1b (IL-1b), Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNFa) (all measured in pg/ml) taken at: Prebypass, cardiopulmonary bypass (2 samples:30 min start of bypass (CPB-30) and end of bypass (CPB-END), postbypass, ICU 8 hours postoperative period (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: Perioperative period (Intraoperatively and 8 hours postoperatively)

,
Interventionpg/ml (Median)
IL-1b Pre-bypassIL-1b CPB-30IL-1b CPB-ENDIL-1b post-bypassIL-1b 8-HRIL-6 Pre-bypassIL-6 CPB-30IL-6 CPB-ENDIL-6 post-bypassIL-6 8HRTNFa-Pre-bypassTNFa CPB-30TNFa CPB-ENDTNFa post-bypassTNFa 8HR
Fentanyl Group1.21.11.21.31.22.610.378.390.992.310.412.614.817.211.2
Remifentanil Group1.21.11.21.11.22.87.477.213693.611.714.418.224.015.4

[back to top]

Insulin Requirement

Average dose of insulin (Units/ml) calculated for each group in the intraoperative period (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: Intraoperative period; Induction to end of surgery

InterventionUnits/ml (Median)
Remifentanil Group2.9
Fentanyl Group8.1

[back to top]

Glycemic Variability

Coefficient of variation in blood glucose levels. Denotes how large the fluctuations in blood glucose are. Higher numbers indicate increased variation. (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: From the start of induction till 24 hours postoperatively

InterventionPercent of Mean Glucose Level (Mean)
Remifentanil Group0.2
Fentanyl Group0.2

[back to top]

Emergence From Anesthesia

Time to extubation after completion of surgery in the operating room and intensive care unit (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: Immediate postoperative period until 30 days post-operatively

InterventionHours (Median)
Remifentanil Group3
Fentanyl Group2.5

[back to top]

Blood Glucose Values (More Than One ) > 180 mg%

"Percentage of patients with two or more intraoperative blood glucose levels greater than 180 mg/dl. Percentage in both groups will be estimated, then the difference in this statistic will form the primary outcome measure of this study.~(Primary Outcome changed on 06/15/2015-Change Approved by University of Pittsburgh IRB on 06/22/2015- First patient enrolled January 2016)" (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: Intraoperative period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Remifentanil Group17
Fentanyl Group33

[back to top]

Development of Chronic Pain

Telephonic call Numeric pain scale; Scale is 0-10, with 10 being the highest pain. (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge from the hospital

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
S-LANSS 1 moS-LANSS 3 moS-LANSS 6 moS-LANSS 12 mo
Fentanyl Group3000
Remifentanil Group1000

[back to top]

Total Postoperative Regular Insulin

Total units of regular insulin required post-operatively (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: From ICU Admission (After Surgery) Until 24 hours postoperatively

InterventionInternational Units (Median)
Remifentanil Group28.1
Fentanyl Group23.5

[back to top]

Number of Blood Glucose Values > 180 mg%

Blood glucose values that exceed 180 mg% will be counted (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: Intraoperative period, Induction to end of surgery

Interventionnumber of glucose values >180mg% (Median)
Remifentanil Group1.2
Fentanyl Group2

[back to top]

Wound Hyperalgesia

Von frey hair objective testing (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: 96 hours postoperatively

,
Interventiong/mm^2 (Mean)
Preop pain threshold48 Hr pain threshold96 hr pain threshold
Fentanyl Group3.303.833.72
Remifentanil Group3.243.713.60

[back to top]

Stress Hormone Levels-Cortisol (µg/dl)

Serum cortisol levels (measured as µg/dl) taken at: Prebypass, cardiopulmonary bypass (2 samples: at start of bypass and end of bypass), postbypass, ICU 8 hours postoperative period (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: Perioperative period (Intraoperatively and 8 hours postoperatively)

,
Interventionµg/dl (Median)
Serum Cortisol PrebypassSerum Cortisol 30 Minute After Start of CPBSerum Cortisol End of CPBSerum Cortisol End of SurgerySerum Cortisol Postoperative (8 Hours)
Fentanyl Group1224.529.028.045.0
Remifentanil Group126.05.08.536.0

[back to top]

Society of Thoracic Surgery Patient Outcomes

Postoperative outcomes collected from the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database. 30 day Mortality (outcome 1) and 30 day Readmission (outcome 2) cerebral vascular accident(outcome 3), prolonged mechanical ventilation (outcome 4), renal failure (outcome 5), atrial fibrillation (outcome 6), cardiac arrest (outcome 7) (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: 30 day outcomes

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
30 day Mortality30 day ReadmissionCerebral Vascular AccidentProlonged mechanical ventilationrenal failureatrial fibrillationcardiac arrest
Fentanyl Group610283183
Remifentanil Group13083243

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain

Pain scores; Every day 6 hour for 48 hours postoperative period (NCT02349152)
Timeframe: Every day 6 hour for 48 hours postoperative period

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Hours 0-6Hrs 7-12Hrs 13-18Hrs 19-24Hrs 25-30Hrs 31-36Hrs 37-42Hrs 43-48
Fentanyl Group7.186.095.185.735.655.945.185.10
Remifentanil Group6.636.536.595.885.945.895.575.08

[back to top]

Pain Score at 30 Minutes

An 11 point Likert Visual Analog Scale with 0 being no pain, 5 being moderate pain and 10 being very severe pain was verbally administered to the patient at 30 minutes post administration of analgesia. (NCT02388321)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine3.36
Fentanyl2.09

[back to top]

Adverse Events at 30 Minutes

The patient were asked at 30 minutes post administration of analgesia if they experienced any side effects like nausea, vomiting, headache etc. (NCT02388321)
Timeframe: 30 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketamine0
Fentanyl0

[back to top]

Assessment Of Participant's Ability To Use The SSEC

Investigator's assessment of participant's ability to use the SSEC system safely and effectively. The assessment consisted of a 4-level categorical evaluation (poor, fair, good, and excellent). Because of the descriptive nature of this study, no formal statistical hypothesis testing was performed. (NCT02395653)
Timeframe: Completed at the time of the participant's termination of study treatment (up to 72 hours after study drug administration)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PoorFairGoodExcellentMissing
SSEC Fentanyl1210480

[back to top]

Assessment Of Adherence Of The SSEC System To Skin

The adhesion of each SSEC was evaluated immediately prior to removal at each 24-hour time point, or at early withdrawal. Adhesion was recorded using the following classification: System adhered to at least 90% of the application area with no edges unattached; System adhered between 75% and 89%; System was <75% adhered and not taped; System was secured with tape. The number of SSEC systems for all time points in each category is presented. Because of the descriptive nature of this study, no formal statistical hypothesis testing was performed. (NCT02395653)
Timeframe: Immediately prior to removal at each 24-hour time point, or at early withdrawal, for up to 3 consecutive days (up to 72 hours)

InterventionSSEC systems (Number)
≥90% of area with no edges unattached75% to 89%<75% adhered and not tapedSystem was secured with tapeNot assessed
SSEC Fentanyl976310

[back to top]

Change From Baseline To 1 Hour And 24 Hours In Skin Irritation Score After SSEC Removal

Skin irritation at the SSEC application site was to be assessed immediately prior to placement of the study system and at 1 and 24 hours after removal of each study system. The application site was to be scored using the following scale: 0=No evidence of irritation; 1=Minimal erythema, barely perceptible; 2=Definite erythema, readily visible, minimal edema, or minimal papular response; 3=Erythema and papules; 4=Definite edema; 5=Erythema, edema, and papules; 6=Vesicular eruption; 7=Strong reaction spreading beyond the application site. (NCT02395653)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 hour and 24 hours after SSEC removal.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
System 1, Hour 1System 1, Hour 24System 2, Hour 1System 2, Hour 24System 3, Hour 1System 3, Hour 24
SSEC Fentanyl1.11.81.01.61.00.8

[back to top]

Number Of Participants To Experience Clinically Relevant Respiratory Depression (CRRD)

Respiratory function and occurrence of CRRD was defined as simultaneous occurrence of bradypnoea (respiratory rate <10 breaths per minute for participants 9-15 years of age and sustained for 1 minute, or <8 breaths per minute for participants 16-17 years of age), with excessive sedation (that is, the participant is not easily aroused). (NCT02395653)
Timeframe: From the time of application of the first system through 7 days following end of study drug administration.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BradypnoeaExcessive SedationSimultaneous Bradypnoea and Excessive Sedation
SSEC Fentanyl000

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Had Inducible Ventricular Tachycardia Under General Anesthesia.

Patients before induction of GA undergo noninvasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) using the patient's ICD. Subjects receive minimal versed/fentanyl during the NIPS. The anesthesiologist will decide whether to use propofol prior to the second induction, depending on the patient's cardiac function and hemodynamic status. After induction of GA with IV propofol, programmed stimulation will be performed from the RV catheter. Mapping under volatile agent will commence any time after twice the redistribution half-life of either agent has elapsed (propofol 4-16 mins) or have passed. Once the drug is out of the central compartment it is unlikely to affect myocardial electrolytes or ion channels. GA will be maintained with an inhalation agent, sevoflurane. A repeat programmed stimulation test will be performed. Endpoint for programmed stimulation will be induction of sustained monomorphic VT (SMVT). (NCT02419547)
Timeframe: While under General Anesthesia, an average of 6 hours

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase 1 Concious SedationPhase 2 PropofolPhase 3 Sevoflurane
Ventriuclar Tachycardia Induction755

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

The frequency and the severity (ex) of the side effects including nausea and vomiting, hypotension, pruritus, and bradycardia were recorded. (NCT02430090)
Timeframe: Up to 4 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Levobupivacaine5
Levobupivacaine + Fentanyl10
Levobupivacaine + Sufentanil9

[back to top]

Incidence of Nausea and Vomiting

The percentage of participants who had nausea and vomiting during postoperative 48 hours (NCT02448862)
Timeframe: Postoperative 48 hours

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Elderly Patients20.6
Young Adults23.8

[back to top]

Incidence of Rescue Analgesics Requirement

The percentage of patients who required rescue analgesics at least once during the postoperative 48-hour period (NCT02448862)
Timeframe: Postoperative 48 hours

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Elderly Patients47.9
Young Adults53.8

[back to top]

Incidence of Rescue Antiemetics Requirement

The proportion of patients who required rescue antiemetics at least once during the postoperative 48-hour period (NCT02448862)
Timeframe: Postoperative 48 hours

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Elderly Patients12.2
Young Adults10.1

[back to top]

Incidence of Dizziness or Headaches

The percentage of participants who had headache and dizziness (NCT02448862)
Timeframe: Postoperative 48 hours

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
headachedizziness
Elderly Patients1.76.5
Young Adults2.39.8

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain in Numeric Pain Scale

The Numeric Pain Scale (NRS - 0: no pain, 10: worst pain can't imagine) for pain measured once at each time periods (0~6, 6~12, 12~18, 18~24, 24~48 hours) (NCT02448862)
Timeframe: Postoperative 48 hours

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Postoperative 0-6 hoursPostoperative 6-12 hoursPostoperative 12-18 hoursPostoperative 18-24 hoursPostoperative 24-48 hours
Elderly Patients5.744.583.973.322.84
Young Adults5.704.683.913.332.83

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Intensity Score

Change in NRS pain intensity scores from randomization to one hour after treatment start based on the percentage of participants with severe pain, NRS score = 7-10, one hour after treatment start for both treatment arms. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain intensity scores (assessed on an 11-point Likert scale with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain). (NCT02459964)
Timeframe: One (1) hour after treatment start.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Arm 1 (Intranasal Fentanyl)5
Treatment Arm 2 (Intravenous Hydromorphone)10

[back to top]

Non-inferiority of Fentanyl Nasal Spray Versus Intravenous Opioids in the Change in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Intensity Score at One Hour, Starting From the Time of Drug Delivery (Treatment Initiation).

The median change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain intensity scores (assessed on an 11-point Likert scale with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain) from randomization, estimate of treatment initiation, to one hour post-treatment calculated for both treatment arms. (NCT02459964)
Timeframe: Baseline, One hour post time of drug delivery/treatment initiation

InterventionNRS Pain Intensity Score (Median)
Treatment Arm 1 (Intranasal Fentanyl)5.14
Treatment Arm 2 (Intravenous Hydromorphone)4.90

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Fentanyl in Plasma (4 of 5)

Tmax (h) (NCT02470390)
Timeframe: 24 hrs (pre-dose, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, & 60 min, and 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Days 1 & 3 for Nasal Fentanyl / Sublingual Fentanyl; pre-dose, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, & 60 min, and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Day 5 for IV Fentanyl)

Interventionh (Median)
Nasal Fentanyl0.63
Sublingual Fentanyl0.75
IV Fentanyl0.07

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Fentanyl in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) (1 of 3)

(NCT02470390)
Timeframe: 6 hrs (pre-dose, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, & 60 min, and 2, 3, 4, & 6 hrs post-dose on Study Days 1 & 3)

Interventionh (Median)
Nasal Fentanyl1.01
Sublingual Fentanyl2.00

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Fentanyl in Plasma (1 of 5)

Cmax (pg/mL) (NCT02470390)
Timeframe: 24 hrs (pre-dose, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, & 60 min, and 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Days 1 & 3 for Nasal Fentanyl / Sublingual Fentanyl; pre-dose, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, & 60 min, and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Day 5 for IV Fentanyl)

Interventionpg/mL (Geometric Mean)
Nasal Fentanyl541.28
Sublingual Fentanyl369.59
IV Fentanyl1166.51

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Fentanyl in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) (2 of 3)

(NCT02470390)
Timeframe: 6 hrs (pre-dose, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, & 60 min, and 2, 3, 4, & 6 hrs post-dose on Study Days 1 & 3)

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
Nasal Fentanyl84.54
Sublingual Fentanyl56.37

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC 0-tlast) of Fentanyl in Plasma (2 of 5)

AUC 0-tlast (pg*h/mL) (NCT02470390)
Timeframe: 24 hrs (pre-dose, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, & 60 min, and 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Days 1 & 3 for Nasal Fentanyl / Sublingual Fentanyl; pre-dose, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, & 60 min, and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Day 5 for IV Fentanyl)

Interventionpg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Nasal Fentanyl2752.51
Sublingual Fentanyl2359.08
IV Fentanyl2236.46

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC 0-inf) of Fentanyl in Plasma (3 of 5)

AUC 0-inf (pg*h/mL) (NCT02470390)
Timeframe: 24 hrs (pre-dose, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, & 60 min, and 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Days 1 & 3 for Nasal Fentanyl / Sublingual Fentanyl; pre-dose, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, & 60 min, and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Day 5 for IV Fentanyl)

Interventionpg*h/mL (Geometric Mean)
Nasal Fentanyl3413.80
Sublingual Fentanyl2879.85
IV Fentanyl2871.89

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Hour 0 to Hour 6 (AUC 0-6h) of Fentanyl in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) (3 of 3)

(NCT02470390)
Timeframe: 6 hrs (pre-dose, 5, 10, 20, 30, 45, & 60 min, and 2, 3, 4, & 6 hrs post-dose on Study Days 1 & 3)

Interventionpg*h/mL (Mean)
Nasal Fentanyl300.25
Sublingual Fentanyl221.49

[back to top]

Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Fentanyl in Plasma (5 of 5)

t1/2 (h) (NCT02470390)
Timeframe: 24 hrs (pre-dose, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, & 60 min, and 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Days 1 & 3 for Nasal Fentanyl / Sublingual Fentanyl; pre-dose, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, & 60 min, and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, & 24 hrs on Study Day 5 for IV Fentanyl)

Interventionh (Geometric Mean)
Nasal Fentanyl12.08
Sublingual Fentanyl10.73
IV Fentanyl12.25

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events, (Graded Using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Criteria 4.0)

Graphical and descriptive statistical summaries will be generated. Mixed-level general linear modeling will be used. All tests of statistical significance will maintain maximum Type I error of 0.05 (p < 0.05). Frequency distributions will summarize the safety outcome. (NCT02480114)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months post-treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I Standard of Care0
Arm II Standard of Care Plus Gabapentin0

[back to top]

Frequency and Severity of General Systemic Symptoms (Surveys Such as the Neurotoxicity Scale, Profile of Mood States, and Quality of Life Form)

Pain severity will be correlated with frequency and severity of general systemic symptoms. Graphical and descriptive statistical summaries will be generated. Mixed-level general linear modeling will be used. All tests of statistical significance will maintain maximum Type I error of 0.05 (p < 0.05). Baseline pain scores will be included as a covariate in the analyses of the outcome. The General Symptom Survey is a ten item patient reported outcome measure and outcomes were averaged as there is only one item per symptom category. 0 represented no presence of the symptom with a score of 10 representing the most severe symptom. (NCT02480114)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months post-treatment

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I Standard of Care1.91
Arm II Standard of Care Plus Gabapentin1.23

[back to top]

Change in Pain Associated With Radiation-induced Mucositis, (Pain Subscale of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey (VHNSS))

The pain subscale is composed of 4 items of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey. The subscale score was calculated by taking the first non-negative principle component of the 4 items. The scale was scores range from 0 to 10 with 10 representing the worst pain. (NCT02480114)
Timeframe: Up to 3 months post-treatment

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Arm I Standard of Care4.26
Arm II Standard of Care Plus Gabapentin3.68

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Pulse Oxygen Saturation Less Than 95 Percent

(NCT02484222)
Timeframe: average 1 hour from extubation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of Participants With Pulse Oxygen Saturation Less Than7

[back to top]

Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting

(NCT02484222)
Timeframe: average 1 hour from extubation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Nausea and Vomiting13

[back to top]

Rescue Morphine Requirement

(NCT02484222)
Timeframe: average 1 hour from extubation

Interventionmg (Median)
The Result of Fentanyl Test30

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Were Light Consumers of Morphine as Identified by the Fentanyl Test

The number of participants who were light consumers of morphine as identified by the Fentanyl Test,we want to know the accurate of the test.The light consumers are the children of who used total morphine <50 μg/kg. (NCT02484222)
Timeframe: average 1 hour from extubation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
The Result of Fentanyl Test47

[back to top]

Partial Area Under the Curve (AUC) Attained With Early and Late Heat in Each of the Three Fentanyl TDSs (Reference and Generic)

"Partial area under the flux-time curve of fentanyl calculated from 11 to 14 h for Early Heat and 18 to 21 h for Late Heat study designs~Blood samples obtained at 15 min prior to patch application [baseline], and at 1:00, 10:00, 10:55, 11:05, 11:15, 11:25, 11:35, 11:45, 12:00, 13:00, 14:00, 16:00, 17:00, 17:55, 18:05, 18:15, 18:25, 18:35, 18:45, 19:00, 20:00, 21:00, and 22:00 h post-patch application" (NCT02486016)
Timeframe: six procedure days for each participant

,,
Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
Early Heat (11 h)Late Heat (18 h)
Apotex Generic Fentanyl TDS2.22.7
Duragesic Reference Fentanyl TDS1.72.4
Mylan Generic Fentanyl TDS2.12.9

[back to top]

Ongoing Pregnancy Rate

positive fetal heart pulsation seen in ultrasound at eight weeks of gestation (NCT02494180)
Timeframe: will be assessed within ten weeks of oocyte retrieval

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A: Intravenous Fentanyl, Midazolam12.9
B: Intravenous Pethidine, Diazepam21.2

[back to top]

Clinical Pregnancy Rate

presence of intrauterine sac in ultrasound after a positive pregnancy test (NCT02494180)
Timeframe: will be assessed within ten weeks of oocyte retrieval

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A: Intravenous Fentanyl, Midazolam14.1
B: Intravenous Pethidine, Diazepam23.5

[back to top]

Patient's Satisfaction on Pain Relief

satisfaction on pain relief will be scored at 0-10 (10 being most satisfied) (NCT02494180)
Timeframe: within 4 hours after retrieval

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
A: Intravenous Fentanyl, Midazolam8
B: Intravenous Pethidine, Diazepam7

[back to top]

Pain Level After Oocyte Retrieval

The pain level will be scored using visual analogue scale 0-10, 0 = no pain, 10 =most painful (NCT02494180)
Timeframe: will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
vaginal painabdominal pain
A: Intravenous Fentanyl, Midazolam02.3
B: Intravenous Pethidine, Diazepam02

[back to top]

Pain Level During Oocyte Retrieval

The pain level will be scored using visual analogue scale 0-10, 0 = no pain, 10 =most painful (NCT02494180)
Timeframe: will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
vaginal painabdominal pain
A: Intravenous Fentanyl, Midazolam02.5
B: Intravenous Pethidine, Diazepam45

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Side Effects by Type

side effects will be scored by yes or no (NCT02494180)
Timeframe: will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
nauseavomitingdizzinessdrowsinessshortness of breath
A: Intravenous Fentanyl, Midazolam2.4016.58.20
B: Intravenous Pethidine, Diazepam7.11.24.73.51.2

[back to top]

Patient's Satisfaction on Oocyte Retrieval

satisfaction will be scored from 0-3 (0=excellent, 1=satisfactory, 2=fair, 3=unsatisfactory) (NCT02494180)
Timeframe: will be assessed within 4 hours of oocyte retrieval

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
excellentsatisfactoryfairunsatisfactory
A: Intravenous Fentanyl, Midazolam47.738.811.84.7
B: Intravenous Pethidine, Diazepam15.355.322.47.1

[back to top]

Exploratory Outcome: Reduction in Age Appropriate Pain Scale Scores

Mean difference in the reduction of the pain scale scores at 20 minutes. Two commonly used, age appropriate and previously validated, pediatric pain assessment tools were used: FACES Pain Scale - Revised for children ages 4-10 and the Visual Analog Scale for children ages 11-17. The FACES Pain Scale - Revised is a self-reported measure of pain intensity developed for children with pain intensity represented by images of grimacing faces on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain). The Visual Analog Scale is a self-reported measure of pain intensity where patients mark their pain level on a 10 cm line that represents a continuum of no pain at 0 cm and worst pain at 10 cm. For analysis, pain scale data were merged and reported as values form 0 to 100. The minimum clinically significant reduction in pain was defined as a decrease of 20. (NCT02521415)
Timeframe: 20 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine44
Fentanyl35

[back to top]

Secondary Outcome: Total Dose of Opioid Pain Medication in Morphine Equivalents/kg/Hour

Compare the total dose of opioid pain medication in morphine equivalents/kg/hour required during the ED evaluation of children with suspected forearm fractures after randomization and treatment with IN ketamine or IN fentanyl. (NCT02521415)
Timeframe: participants will be followed during the emergency department length of stay, estimated to average 6 hours

Interventionmorphine equivalents/kg/hr (Median)
Ketamine0.04
Fentanyl0.05

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC 0-∞ ) ng∙h/mL

drug concentration in serum vs. time; reflects the actual body exposure to drug after administration of a dose of the drug (NCT02531971)
Timeframe: 10 procedure days for Duragesic and Mylan arms each

Interventionng∙h/mL (Mean)
Duragesic60.1
Mylan64.2

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction Using a Likert Satisfaction Survey

At 24 hour after the procedure a call was made asking the volunteer to provide a number on a scale to describe their satisfaction with their pain control and their overall satisfaction. A 5 point likert scale was used 1 = very satisfied, 2 satisfied, 3 neither satisfied nor dis-satisfied, 4 not satisfied and 5 very unsatisfied. (NCT02571634)
Timeframe: 24 hours

InterventionUnits on scale (Mean)
Pain control satisfactionOverall satisfaction
Open Label1.571.57

[back to top]

Sedation Level Assessed by POSS Tool

At baseline, 15 minutes post medication receipt, 30 minutes , 45 minutes and at discharge a Pasero-Opioid Sedation Scale Score was obtained. This scale is to measure alertness and amount of sedation. POSS was the abbreviated term used for this scale. The guidelines for that scale include: S= sleeping easily aroused 1= alert and awake; 2= slightly drowsy easily aroused; 3= frequently drowsy, drifts off to sleep during conversation; 4= somnolent, minimal or no response (NCT02571634)
Timeframe: Baseline, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, discharge

InterventionPOSS sedation scores (Mean)
Pre procedure Poss scorePoss score15minutesPOSS 30 minutesPOSS post 45 minutesPOSS discharge
Open Label11.041.041.041.0

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Volunteers are monitored closely with vs, and sedation levels and any adverse issues will be recorded. (NCT02571634)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionnumber of adverse events (Number)
Open Label0

[back to top]

Pain Score Differences Using the DVPRS (Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale) Tool.

DVPRS pain scores will be recorded baseline and at 15 minutes post dosing, 30 minutes, 45 minutes and discharge. The DVPRS is a pain scale utilizing color coding descriptive terms and faces to describe pain levels from 0 meaning no pain and 10 the most excruciating pain ever. (NCT02571634)
Timeframe: Baseline, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, and discharge

Interventionpain score (Mean)
Pre procedure average pain score15 minute average pain score30 minute average pain score45 minute average pain scoreDischarge pain score
Open Label4.703.612.522.521.65

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability as Measured by the Number of Adverse Events

Adverse events will be recorded by a yes or no as to their occurence (NCT02571634)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Open Label0

[back to top]

Time to T 10 Level

Elapsed time in minutes to achieve T 10 level of anesthesia. Assessed by the anesthesia care provider using crushed ice. T 10 level is numbness up to the level of the belly button. (NCT02574832)
Timeframe: 20 minutes after drug administration

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Spinal Lidocaine Administration12.5

[back to top]

Total Postop Opioid Consumption of Patients Receiving (1) Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter Compared to (2) Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Saphenous Nerve Block.

Total postop opioid consumption measured by total pain pills on POD 2 and 3 of patients receiving (1) preoperative femoral nerve block plus postoperative continuous adductor canal nerve catheter compared to (2) preoperative femoral nerve block plus postoperative saphenous nerve block. (NCT02584452)
Timeframe: Post Operative Day 2 and 3

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Post Operative Day 272081712Post Operative Day 272081714Post Operative Day 372081714Post Operative Day 372081712
0 pills1 pill2 pills3 pills4 pills4.5 pills5 pills6 pills7 pills8 pills9 pills10 pills11 pills12 pills13 pills
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block3
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter9
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block5
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter3
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter6
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter4
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block4
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter7
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter2
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block2
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block0
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter1
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block1
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter0

[back to top]

Subjective Postoperative Pain Score at Post Operative Week 6 of Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter Compared to Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Saphenous Nerve Block

Subjective postoperative pain score at post operative week 6 of preoperative femoral nerve block plus postoperative continuous adductor canal nerve catheter compared to preoperative femoral nerve block plus postoperative saphenous nerve block using Subjective Numeric Pain Scale score with and without activity (on an 11 point scale when 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain). (NCT02584452)
Timeframe: Post Operative Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
With activity72081712With activity72081714Without activity72081714Without activity72081712
0 (Pain on Subjective Numeric Pain Scale)1 (Pain on Subjective Numeric Pain Scale)2 (Pain on Subjective Numeric Pain Scale)3 (Pain on Subjective Numeric Pain Scale)5 (Pain on Subjective Numeric Pain Scale)4 (Pain on Subjective Numeric Pain Scale)
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter8
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block9
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter5
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block1
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter10
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter3
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block3
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter22
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block14
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter4
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block4
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter2
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter1
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block0
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter0

[back to top]

Quadriceps Strength on POD Week 6- Pts Receiving (1) Long-acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block Comparied to (2) Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter.

Quadriceps strength on POD week 6- pts receiving (1) long-acting single bolus adductor canal nerve block comparied to (2) continuous adductor canal nerve catheter using Straight Leg Raise Tests, 0-5/5 scale, and knee extension, 0-5/5 scale. On both scales (straight leg raise test and knee extension) 0 indicates the minimum value (low muscle contraction/no movement) and 5 indicates the maximum (normal muscle contraction /pt holds position against pressure). (NCT02584452)
Timeframe: Post Operative Week 6

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Straight Leg Raise Test72081712Straight Leg Raise Test72081714Knee extension Test72081712Knee extension Test72081714
345
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter1
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block1
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter15
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block9
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block10
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter3
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block3
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter21
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block12
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter7
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block5

[back to top]

Quadriceps Strength of on POD 1 of Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter Compared to Preoperative Femoral Nerve Block Plus Postoperative Saphenous Nerve Block at 48 Hours After Discharge From PACU

Quadriceps strength on POD 1 of preoperative femoral nerve block plus postoperative continuous adductor canal nerve catheter compared to preoperative femoral nerve block plus postoperative saphenous nerve block using Straight Leg Raise Tests, 0-5/5 scale, and knee extension, 0-5/5 scale. On both scales (straight leg raise test and knee extension) 0 indicates the minimum value (low muscle contraction/no movement) and 5 indicates the maximum (normal muscle contraction /pt holds position against pressure). (NCT02584452)
Timeframe: Post Operative Day 1

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Straight Leg Raise Test72081712Straight Leg Raise Test72081714Knee extension Test72081714Knee extension Test72081712
045123
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter1
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter3
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block7
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block4
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter8
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter2
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter11
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block9
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter9
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block3
Continuous Adductor Canal Nerve Catheter6
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block2
Long-Acting Single Bolus Adductor Canal Nerve Block1

[back to top]

Walk Time

We measured the difference in walk time (in minutes) between the first and second shuttle walk tests. (NCT02597478)
Timeframe: After the first shuttle walk test and after the second shuttle walk test

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Intervention Group (High Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)0.5
Controlled Group (Low Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)0.3

[back to top]

Walk Distance

We measured the difference in walk distance (in meters) between the first and second shuttle walk tests. (NCT02597478)
Timeframe: After the first shuttle walk test and after the second shuttle walk test

Interventionmeters (Mean)
Intervention Group (High Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)43.7
Controlled Group (Low Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)24.2

[back to top]

Modified Dyspnea Borg Scale (Dyspnea Unpleasantness)

"The modified Borg scale (dyspnea unpleasantness), which ranges from 0 (no shortness of breath) to 10 (worst possible shortness of breath). We measured the change in modified dyspnea Borg scale (0-10) between the first and second shuttle walk tests." (NCT02597478)
Timeframe: Before and after the first and second shuttle walk tests

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intervention Group (High Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)-1.0
Controlled Group (Low Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)-0.6

[back to top]

Modified Dyspnea Borg Scale (Dyspnea Intensity)

"The primary outcome was dyspnea intensity now using the modified Borg scale, which ranges from 0 (no shortness of breath) to 10 (worst possible shortness of breath). We measured the change in modified dyspnea Borg scale (0-10) between the first and second shuttle walk tests. This scale has been validated in multiple studies, with a minimal clinically significant difference of 1 point." (NCT02597478)
Timeframe: Before and after the first and second shuttle walk tests

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intervention Group (High Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)-1.4
Controlled Group (Low Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)-0.5

[back to top]

Fatigue Modified Borg Score

"The fatigue modified Borg scale, which ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (worst). We measured the change in modified fatigue Borg scale (0-10) between the first and second shuttle walk tests." (NCT02597478)
Timeframe: Before and after the first and second shuttle walk tests

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intervention Group (High Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)-1.0
Controlled Group (Low Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray)0.2

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced Postoperative Complications

The investigators will make a telephone call to the subjects at 3 months and 1 year after surgery to determine if the subject has experienced any complications. We will ask the subjects about the occurrence of infections, strokes, cardiac problems, or respiratory problems since discharge from the hospital. (NCT02604459)
Timeframe: 3 months and 1 year

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
3 Months: Cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation3 Months: Myocardial infarction3 Months: Both cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation and myocardial infarction3 Months: Deep incisional surgical site infection3 Months: Organ/space surgical site infection1 Year: Cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation1 Year: Myocardial infarction1 Year: Both cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation and myocardial infarction1 Year: Deep incisional surgical site infection1 Year: Organ/space surgical site infection
Active Comparator: Usual General Anesthesia Care1100120110
Experimental: Optimized General Anesthesia Care0101201012
Mini Mental State Exam0100020000

[back to top]

Severity of Postoperative Delirium

Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) is a 16-item clinician-rated scale with 13 severity items and 3 diagnostic items (maximum severity score of 39 points). Higher scores indicate more severe delirium; score of 0 indicates no delirium. Only the number of patients who had high scores on the DRS-R-98 are reported. (NCT02604459)
Timeframe: 5 postoperative days

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Active Comparator: Usual General Anesthesia Care0.14
Experimental: Optimized General Anesthesia Care0.06
Mini Mental State Exam0.63

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Presented With Postoperative Delirium

Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) with delirium scored as 'present' (1) or 'absent' (0) based on question responses; CAM is considered positive based on the CAM algorithm: presence of acute onset or fluctuating course, inattention, and disorganized thinking or altered level of consciousness. (NCT02604459)
Timeframe: 5 postoperative days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Active Comparator: Usual General Anesthesia Care8
Experimental: Optimized General Anesthesia Care4
Mini Mental State Exam0

[back to top]

Consumption of Fentanyl

consumption of fentanyl (mg) during the procedure (NCT02616523)
Timeframe: time of the operation

Interventionmg (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine41
Lidocaine50
Placebo58

[back to top]

Consumption of Piritramide

consumption of piritramide (mg) in the recovery room (NCT02616523)
Timeframe: one hour after the operation

Interventionmg (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine4.63
Lidocaine5.25
Placebo4.25

[back to top]

Neuropathic Pain (Pain Questionnaire) dn4

Pain questionnaire dn4 will be send to participants after two months of surgery to evaluate the neuropathic pain. There are minimum 0 points and maximum 10 points. If the score is 4 or higher then the pain is likely to be neuropathic pain. (NCT02616523)
Timeframe: two months after the surgery

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine0.11
Lidocaine0.00
Placebo0.45

[back to top]

PONV Incidence: Number of Participants With Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

The occurrence of PONV, as defined by the administration of antiemetics in the PACU between admission to PACU and discharge from PACU. (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: PACU recovery period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Measurement139
CDS Email Recommendations1323
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations1343

[back to top]

Adherence to PONV Guidelines

PONV guideline adherence: percentage of patients who received the exact number of prophylactic interventions for PONV that were recommended by the decision support. (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: the start of admission at the holding room to the end of the anesthetic case

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Measurement666
CDS Email Recommendations5260
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations5863

[back to top]

The Number of Prophylactic Interventions for PONV

the absolute number of prophylactic interventions applied between the admission of the patient in the holding room until admission to the PACU. (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: from the start of admission at the holding room to the end of the anesthetic case

Interventionprophylactic antiemetics administered (Mean)
Baseline Measurement2.196
CDS Email Recommendations2.176
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations2.129

[back to top]

Time to Discharge From the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

This is the number of minutes from admission to the PACU until discharge, assessed up to 2 days (NCT02625181)
Timeframe: A specific time frame on the day of surgery: from the start of admission to the PACU to discharge from the PACU

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline Measurement266
CDS Email Recommendations264
CDS Email + Real TIme Recommenations266

[back to top]

Patient Self-reported Pain

"Patient self report of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS). Scale ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 being No pain and 10 being Most severe pain." (NCT02683707)
Timeframe: 2 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PCI Without IV Opiate2.3
PCI With IV Opiate1.5

[back to top]

Ticagrelor Pharmacokinetics

Area under the curve for Ticagrelor Absorption (NCT02683707)
Timeframe: Measured over 24 hours (at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours)

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
PCI Without IV Opiate3301
PCI With IV Opiate2107

[back to top]

Platelet Reactivity Using Light Transmission Aggregometry

Blood test of Platelet Cell Reactivity using Light Transmission Aggregometry (reported as percent of baseline aggregation in response to adenosine diphosphate stimulation) (NCT02683707)
Timeframe: Measured at 2 hours

Interventionpercentage of baseline aggregation (Mean)
PCI Without IV Opiate27.5
PCI With IV Opiate39.3

[back to top]

Single Time-point Platelet Reactivity Using Verify Now

Blood test of Platelet Cell Reactivity using Verify Now (P2Y12 Reactivity Units) (NCT02683707)
Timeframe: Measured at 2 hours

InterventionPRUs (Mean)
PCI Without IV Opiate78
PCI With IV Opiate112

[back to top]

Ovoids Size

Size of ovoids that a pair part of brachytherapy applicator insert in vagina trough cervix. (NCT02684942)
Timeframe: after complete applicator insertion.

InterventionCentimeter (Median)
Meperidine2
Fentanyl2

[back to top]

Meperidine Dose

Sum of meperidine dose when finish each fraction of brachytherapy (NCT02684942)
Timeframe: after complete treatment.

Interventionmg. (Mean)
Meperidine50.13

[back to top]

Quality of Life

Perceived Quality of life (EQ-5D) was assessed before the first brachytherpy and immediately after completion of each of the 4 brachytherapy fractions. The EQ-5D have 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, topics each content 3 responses: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. (NCT02684942)
Timeframe: From date of the first fraction of brachytherapy until date of the last fraction of brachytherapy,once a week for 4 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
No problems in mobilitySome problems in mobilitySevere problems in mobilityNo problem in self-careSome problem in self-careSevere problem in self-careNo problem in usual activitiesSome problem in usual activitiesSevere problem in usual activitiesNo problem in pain/discomfortSome problem in pain/discomfortSevere problem in pain/discomfortNo problem in anxiety/depressionSome problem in anxiety/depressionSevere problem in anxiety/depression
Fentanyl581816962532132353142332
Meperidine6216168110552222749346321

[back to top]

Fentanyl Dose

Sum of fentanyl dose when finish each fraction of brachytherapy (NCT02684942)
Timeframe: after complete treatment.

Interventionug. (Mean)
Fentanyl100.18

[back to top]

Pain Score

Perceived pain score according to standard 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was assessed before injection of medicine for every 15 minutes up to 120 minutes.The minimum and maximum scores were 0, 10. Score 0 means no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, 7-9 severe pain and 10 worst pain. (NCT02684942)
Timeframe: From date of the first fraction until date of the last fraction of brachytherapy, once a week for four weeks

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
baseline0 minute15 minute30 minute45 minute60 minute75 minute90 minute105 minute120 minute
Fentanyl0.140.400.651.241.700.810.530.130.130.13
Meperidine0.040.490.591.051.330.610.490.240.240.24

[back to top]

Tumor Size

Size of tumor at cervix measured by the doctor before insert applicator. (NCT02684942)
Timeframe: Before insert applicator in each fraction of brachytherapy.

InterventionCM. (Mean)
Meperidine2.23
Fentanyl2.21

[back to top]

Cumulative Fentanyl Dose

(NCT02691572)
Timeframe: 24 h

Interventionmcg (Mean)
Wound Infiltration157.4
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block153.3

[back to top]

Narcotic Usage

Inpatient narcotic usage (NCT02721017)
Timeframe: Post Operative Hospital Stay

Interventionmg (Mean)
Cryoanalgesia268
Thoracic Epidural684

[back to top]

Mean Neuropathic Pain Score at One Year

"Neuropathic specific pain (described as burning, electrical or tingling sensations) was assessed by study questionnaire via numerical pain scale (1 to 10, with 10 representing a maximum score, or worst pain possible)." (NCT02721017)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cryoanalgesia2.4
Thoracic Epidural1.9

[back to top]

Length of Hospitalization

the length of the patient's in-hospital stay following admission for Nuss procedure (NCT02721017)
Timeframe: estimated one week or less

InterventionLength of Stay (Post-Operative Days) (Median)
Cryoanalgesia3
Thoracic Epidural5

[back to top]

Total Opioid Dose, in Morphine Equivalents, in the First 24 Hours After Pediatric Cardiac Bypass Surgery.

The distribution of the total opioid dose in the first 24 hours will be evaluated by randomization group (methadone vs. fentanyl) and differences between groups will be tested. It is hypothesized that compared to fentanyl, methadone administered intraoperative will result in a significantly lower total opioid dose (morphine or oxycodone) during the first 24 hour postoperative period. Assuming no difference between the two treatment strategies in the population, a total sample size of 52 in each group will provide 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.1. Significance will be measured as a 30% reduction in postoperative pain requirement. (NCT02747875)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionmg postop morphine equivelant 24hr (Mean)
Control - Fentanyl0.55
Treatment - Methadone0.48

[back to top] [back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after study medication

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Ketamine126.3
Fentanyl123.4

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after study medication

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Ketamine127.3
Fentanyl127.9

[back to top]

Respiratory Rate

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after study medication

Interventionbreaths per minute (Mean)
Ketamine21.8
Fentanyl19.7

[back to top]

Respiratory Rate

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after study medication

Interventionbreaths per minute (Mean)
Ketamine23.3
Fentanyl19.9

[back to top]

Respiratory Rate

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after study medication

Interventionbreaths per minute (Mean)
Ketamine23.1
Fentanyl22.3

[back to top]

Oxygen Saturation

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after study medication

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Ketamine99.3
Fentanyl99.3

[back to top]

Oxygen Saturation

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after study medication

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Ketamine99.5
Fentanyl99.4

[back to top]

Difference From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale Pain Score

A VAS score is a self reported pain score of 0-100 millimeters (0 = no pain; 100 = worst possible pain). A decrease in a VAS score indicates a decrease in pain severity. (NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after study medication

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine-30.6
Fentanyl-31.9

[back to top]

Difference From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale Pain Score

A VAS score is a self reported pain score of 0-100 millimeters (0 = no pain; 100 = worst possible pain). A decrease in a VAS score indicates a decrease in pain severity. (NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after study medication

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine-24.4
Fentanyl-25.3

[back to top]

Difference From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale Pain Score

A VAS score is a self reported pain score of 0-100 millimeters (0 = no pain; 100 = worst possible pain). A decrease in a VAS score indicates a decrease in pain severity. (NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after study medication

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine-27.7
Fentanyl-29.0

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after study medication

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Ketamine76.3
Fentanyl73.6

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after study medication

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Ketamine76.1
Fentanyl73.4

[back to top]

Capnometry Value

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after study medication

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Ketamine38.7
Fentanyl38.9

[back to top]

Heart Rate

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after study medication

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Ketamine90.1
Fentanyl84.4

[back to top]

Heart Rate

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after study medication

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Ketamine90.5
Fentanyl85.6

[back to top]

Systolic Blood Pressure

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after study medication

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Ketamine122.3
Fentanyl122.0

[back to top]

Heart Rate

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after study medication

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Ketamine85.1
Fentanyl82.9

[back to top]

Oxygen Saturation

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after study medication

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Ketamine99.6
Fentanyl99.2

[back to top]

Capnometry Value

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 30 minutes after study medication

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Ketamine38.6
Fentanyl40.4

[back to top]

Capnometry Value

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 15 minutes after study medication

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Ketamine36.6
Fentanyl38.3

[back to top]

Diastolic Blood Pressure

(NCT02778880)
Timeframe: 60 minutes after study medication

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Ketamine70.8
Fentanyl70.6

[back to top]

Cumulative 24 Hour Oral Morphine Equivalent Consumption

Post-operative analgesia at 24 hours (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: 24 hours (Day 1)

Interventionmg (Median)
Adductor Canal Block111.8
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone118
Adductor Canal Catheter153

[back to top]

Cumulative 12 Hour Oral Morphine Equivalent Consumption

Post-operative analgesia at 12 hours (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: 12 hours (Day 0)

Interventionmg (Median)
Adductor Canal Block61.5
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone49.5
Adductor Canal Catheter82

[back to top]

Adductor Canal Block Complications

Incidence of catheter dislodgement or site infection (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: From time of catheter insertion until catheter removal, up to Day2/48 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adductor Canal Block0
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone0
Adductor Canal Catheter0

[back to top]

Nerve Block Complications

Nerve block complications at any time point during study (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: 0 to 48 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Adductor Canal Block0
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone0
Adductor Canal Catheter0

[back to top]

Time to First Use of PCA

from time zero to first press of PCA button (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: 0 to 48 hours

Interventionhours (Median)
Adductor Canal Block4.1
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone4.9
Adductor Canal Catheter3.8

[back to top]

Pain Score

Patient's level of pain using NRS (Numeric Ratings Scale) pain scale where the range is 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: 12, 24 and 48 hours

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
12h24h48h
Adductor Canal Block332
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone333
Adductor Canal Catheter433

[back to top]

Incidence of Participants With Nausea/Vomiting Requiring Anti-emetics

Number of Participants with Nausea/Vomiting requiring anti-emetics from 0-48 hours after surgery. (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: 0 to 48 hours

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0-12h12-24h24-48h
Adductor Canal Block192615
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone141717
Adductor Canal Catheter192417

[back to top]

Quality of Recovery (QoR-40)

Quality of recovery measured using the QoR-40 at 48 hours postoperatively. This is a validated scale where a higher score denotes better recovery/satisfaction after surgery. The range is 40-200. (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: 48 hours (Day 2)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Adductor Canal Block160.5
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone166.5
Adductor Canal Catheter167.2

[back to top]

Length of Stay

Time to hospital discharge (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: From surgical date until hospital discharge, up to 3 weeks

Interventionhours (Median)
Adductor Canal Block70.8
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone71.5
Adductor Canal Catheter71.5

[back to top]

Cumulative 48 Hour Oral Morphine Equivalent Consumption

Post-operative analgesia at 48 hours (NCT02798835)
Timeframe: 48 hours (Day 2)

Interventionmg (Median)
Adductor Canal Block192.9
Adductor Canal Block With Dexamethasone196
Adductor Canal Catheter223.5

[back to top]

Time to Void

Time from spinal anesthesia injection to ability to void spontaneously. (NCT02862912)
Timeframe: 5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Bupivacaine (BUP)229
Chloroprocaine (CP)158

[back to top]

Time to Resolution of Motor Block

"The mean difference between groups in time between the end of spinal injection (t IT) to time for no motor block (t motor), i.e. tIT - T motor. Motor block will be assessed using the Bromage scale:~Bromage Scale I = free movement of the legs and feet = no block II = able to flex knees, with free movement of feet = partial (33%) block III = unable to flex knees, but with free movement of the feet = almost complete (66%) block IV = unable to move legs or feet = complete block (100%)" (NCT02862912)
Timeframe: 3 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Chloroprocaine (CP)109
Bupivacaine (BUP)112

[back to top]

Time to Ambulate

Time from spinal anesthesia placement to ability to ambulate. (NCT02862912)
Timeframe: 5 hours

Interventionminutes (Median)
Chloroprocaine (CP)158
Bupivacaine (BUP)229

[back to top]

Pain Scores (Numerical Rating Scale 0-10) Using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised

"Average pain scores during the day of surgery using the FPS-R rates pain on a scale from 1-10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 very much pain. Each level accompanies a facial expression, ranging from content to distress." (NCT02880540)
Timeframe: From surgery until discharge from the hospital, an average of 48 hours.

InterventionUnits on a scale (Median)
Control Group5
Dexmedetomidine Treated3.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction

A 5-point qualitative Likert scale was used to report measures of patient satisfaction (i.e., not satisfied at all, not satisfied, somewhat, satisfied, very satisfied). To quantify satisfaction, these responses were transformed to a scale of 0-4, with higher numbers representing greater levels of satisfaction. (NCT02886286)
Timeframe: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine + Opioid2.36
Opioid1.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS)

"Patients will be provided with a diary to record pain scores just before a PTM bolus and the lowest pain score within half an hour after a PTM bolus.~Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain" (NCT02886286)
Timeframe: Before self-administered bolus using Patient Therapy Manager device (PTM) and within 30 minutes of PTM bolus

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine + Opioid1.87
Opioid1.81

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS)

"Average Weekly Numeric Pain Rating Score (NRS) over the past week~Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRS): scale from 0-10 0 = no pain 10 = worst imaginable pain" (NCT02886286)
Timeframe: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine + Opioid-0.47
Opioid-0.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

"Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): calculated as a percentage based on scores from 0-5 in 10 categories (pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, travelling). 0 signifies no pain interference while 5 signifies maximum possible pain interference in the 10 categories. Scores from 0-5 for 10 categories are added and divided by total possible score (50) X 100 to give percentage.~Interpretation of percentage scores:~0 - 20% minimal disability 21-40% moderate disability 41-60% severe disability 61-80% crippled 81-100% either bed bound or patient is exaggerating symptoms" (NCT02886286)
Timeframe: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine + Opioid.88
Opioid2.67

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in painDETECT

painDETECT is a nine-item questionnaire that consists of seven sensory symptom items for pain that are graded from 0= never to 5= strongly, one temporal item on pain-course pattern graded -1 to +1, and one spatial item on pain radiation graded 0 for no radiation or +2 for radiating pain. A total score that ranges from -1 to 38 can be calculated from the nine items, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain. (NCT02886286)
Timeframe: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine + Opioid0.69
Opioid0.25

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

"Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC): reflects patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment~= very much improved~= much improved~= minimally improved~= no change~= worse~= much worse~= very much worse" (NCT02886286)
Timeframe: Day 0, 7, 14, score at day 7 or day 14 reported

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Bupivacaine + Opioid-0.06
Opioid1.25

[back to top]

NRS Pain Intensity Score at Each Scheduled Time Point After Time 0

Pain intensity was assessed by the participant using an 11-point NRS from 0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain. Pain intensity scores were collected at Baseline (prior to study drug administration) and at multiple time points after Time 0 (time of administration of the first dose of study drug). A lower value indicates improvement in pain. (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 16, and 24 hours

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 Hour16 Hours24 hours
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray6.53.72.62.0
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray6.14.33.93.2
Placebo7.15.85.53.3

[back to top]

Time (Minutes) to First Perceptible Pain Relief From Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)

Time to perceptible and meaningful pain relief will be evaluated using the 2-stopwatch method (after the first dose only) (2 stopwatches will be started as soon as the first dose of study drug is administered. Each participant will be instructed to stop the first stopwatch when he or she experiences any perceptible pain relief and the second stopwatch when he or she experiences pain relief that is meaningful to them.) (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Within 48 hours after Time 0

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray5
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray10
Placebo20

[back to top]

Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) After Time 0

TOTPAR was assessed by the participant using a 5-point NRS (0=no relief, 1=a little, 2=some, 3=a lot, 4=complete relief). TOTPAR scores were collected at Baseline (prior to study drug) and at multiple time points up to 48 hours after Time 0 (first dose of study drug). The TOTPAR scores are the sum of the pain relief at each time point multiplied by the duration in hours since the previous time point. Larger positive numbers indicate more pain relief (maximum=4 at each time point) and smaller positive numbers indicate less pain relief (minimum=0 at each time point). The overall minimum is 0 for each variable and the overall maximum is 4 times the number of hours specified for the variable: TOTPAR-4=(0 to 16), TOTPAR-8=(0 to 32), TOTPAR-24=(0 to 96) and TOTPAR-48=(0 to 192). TOTPAR-4, TOTPAR-8, TOTPAR-24 and TOTPAR-48 were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with factors for treatment, site and baseline pain intensity. (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Over 0 to 4 hours (TOTPAR-4), over 0 to 8 hours (TOTPAR-8), over 0 to 24 hours (TOTPAR-24), and over 0 to 48 hours (TOTPAR-48)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Over 48 HoursOver 24 HoursOver 8 HoursOver 4 Hours
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray98.243.811.65.3
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray99.946.510.65.1
Placebo98.238.37.23.9

[back to top]

Time to Onset of Analgesia

Measured as time to perceptible pain relief confirmed by meaningful pain relief using the 2-stopwatch method (2 stopwatches will be started as soon as the first dose of study drug is administered. Each participant will be instructed to stop the first stopwatch when he or she experiences any perceptible pain relief and the second stopwatch when he or she experiences pain relief that is meaningful to them.) (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Within 48 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray5
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray184
PlaceboNA

[back to top]

Time (Minutes) to First Use of Rescue Medication (Duration of Analgesia) Following Each Dose of the Investigational Product (IP)

(NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Within 48 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray204.0
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray289.0
Placebo126.0

[back to top]

Time (Minutes) to Meaningful Pain Relief From Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)

Time to perceptible and meaningful pain relief will be evaluated using the 2-stopwatch method (after the first dose only) (2 stopwatches will be started as soon as the first dose of study drug is administered. Each participant will be instructed to stop the first stopwatch when he or she experiences any perceptible pain relief and the second stopwatch when he or she experiences pain relief that is meaningful to them.) (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Within 48 hours after Time 0

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray49
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray190
Placebo79

[back to top]

Time (Minutes) to Peak Pain Relief From Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)

(NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Within 48 hours after Time 0

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray300.0
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray420.0
Placebo1198

[back to top]

Pain Relief at Each Scheduled Time Point After Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)

Pain relief is determined on a 5-point categorical scale where 0=none, 1=a little, 2=some, 3=a lot, 4=complete. (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: 2.5, 5, 15, 30, and 45 minutes, and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 48 hours, as well as immediately before each use of rescue analgesia

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
2.5 Minutes After Time 0725346452.5 Minutes After Time 0725346472.5 Minutes After Time 0725346465 Minutes After Time 0725346465 Minutes After Time 0725346475 Minutes After Time 07253464515 Minutes After Time 07253464515 Minutes After Time 07253464615 Minutes After Time 07253464730 Minutes After Time 0 - No Relief7253464730 Minutes After Time 0 - No Relief7253464530 Minutes After Time 0 - No Relief7253464645 Minutes After Time 07253464645 Minutes After Time 07253464545 Minutes After Time 0725346471 Hour After Time 0725346451 Hour After Time 0725346471 Hour After Time 0725346461.5 Hours After Time 0725346451.5 Hours After Time 0725346471.5 Hours After Time 0725346462 Hours After Time 0725346452 Hours After Time 0725346472 Hours After Time 0725346463 Hours After Time 0725346453 Hours After Time 0725346463 Hours After Time 0725346474 Hours After Time 0725346454 Hours After Time 0725346464 Hours After Time 0725346475 Hours After Time 0725346455 Hours After Time 0725346465 Hours After Time 0725346476 Hours After Time 0725346476 Hours After Time 0725346466 Hours After Time 0725346457 Hours After Time 0725346457 Hours After Time 0725346467 Hours After Time 0725346478 Hours After Time 0725346458 Hours After Time 0725346468 Hours After Time 07253464712 Hours After Time 07253464512 Hours After Time 07253464712 Hours After Time 07253464616 Hours After Time 07253464716 Hours After Time 07253464616 Hours After Time 07253464520 Hours After Time 07253464520 Hours After Time 07253464720 Hours After Time 07253464624 Hours After Time 07253464524 Hours After Time 07253464624 Hours After Time 07253464732 Hours After Time 07253464532 Hours After Time 07253464732 Hours After Time 07253464640 Hours After Time 07253464540 Hours After Time 07253464740 Hours After Time 07253464648 Hours After Time 07253464548 Hours After Time 07253464748 Hours After Time 072534646
No ReliefA Little ReliefSome ReliefA Lot of ReliefComplete Relief
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray9
Placebo11
Placebo10
Placebo2
Placebo1
Placebo0
Placebo9
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray0
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray0
Placebo6
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray5
Placebo5
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray3
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray2
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray4
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray1
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray7
Placebo7
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray6
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray2
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray8
Placebo8
Placebo3
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray4
Placebo4
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray1
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray7
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray6
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray9
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray8
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray3
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray5

[back to top]

NRS Pain Intensity Difference (NRS PID) at Each Categorical Time Point After Time 0

Pain intensity was assessed by the participant using an 11-point NRS from 0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain. Pain intensity scores were collected at Baseline (prior to study drug administration) and at multiple time points after Time 0 (time of administration of the first dose of study drug). NRS PID is defined as the difference in pain at each scheduled time point relative to Baseline (PID=pain intensity at baseline - pain intensity at time point). A higher value of NRS PID score indicates a higher decrease in pain from Baseline. NRS PID is reported as the least squares mean difference. (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Baseline, 1, 16, and 24 hours

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 Hour16 Hours24 Hours
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray6.53.72.62.0
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray6.14.33.93.2
Placebo7.15.85.53.3

[back to top]

Peak Pain Relief From Time 0 (First Dose of Study Medication)

The highest level of pain relief achieved on a 5-point categorical scale where 0=none, 1=a little, 2=some, 3=a lot, 4=complete. (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Within 48 hours after Time 0

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
A Little ReliefSome ReliefA Lot of ReliefComplete Relief
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray2058
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray01113
Placebo0276

[back to top]

Number of Participants Using Rescue Analgesia Over 0 to 24 Hours and Over 0 to 48 Hours

(NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Over 0 to 24 hours; Over 0 to 48 hours

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Over 24 HoursOver 48 hours
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray1111
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray1212
Placebo1515

[back to top]

NRS SPID After Time 0

Pain intensity was assessed by the participant using an 11-point NRS from 0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain. Pain intensity scores were collected at Baseline (prior to study drug) and at multiple time points after Time 0 (administration of first dose of study drug). Pain intensity difference is calculated by subtracting the pain intensity at each time point from the pain intensity at Time 0. The SPID scores are the sum of the differences at each time point multiplied by the duration in hours since the previous time point. Positive numbers indicate a reduction in pain [maximum(max)=10 at each timepoint], and negative numbers indicate an increase in pain [minimum(min)=-10 at each timepoint]. The overall min and max are -10 and 10 times the number of hours specified: SPID-4=(-40 to 40), SPID-8=(-80 to 80) and SPID-24=(-240 to 240). The NRS SPID-4, 8 and 24 were analyzed using an ANCOVA model which included treatment and site as main effects and Baseline pain intensity as the covariate. (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Over 0 to 4 hours (NRS SPID-4), over 0 to 8 hours (NRS SPID-8), and over 0 to 24 hours (NRS SPID-24)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Over 24 HoursOver 8 HoursOver 4 Hours
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray67.413.66.6
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray51.711.25.9
Placebo51.78.84.8

[back to top]

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Summed Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) Over 0 to 48 Hours (NRS SPID-48) After Time 0

Pain intensity was assessed by the participant using an 11-point NRS from 0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain. Pain intensity scores were collected at Baseline (prior to study drug) and at multiple time points up to 48 hours after Time 0 (administration of first dose of study drug). Pain intensity difference is calculated by subtracting the pain intensity at each time point from the pain intensity at Time 0. The SPID scores are the sum of the differences at each time point multiplied by the duration in hours since the previous time point. Positive numbers indicate a reduction in pain [maximum(max)=10 at each time point], and negative numbers indicate an increase in pain [minimum(min)=-10 at each time point]. The overall min and max are -10 and 10 times the number of hours specified; SPID-48 range is -480 to 480. The NRS SPID-48 was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, which included treatment and site as main effects and Baseline pain intensity as the covariate. (NCT02915978)
Timeframe: Over 0 to 48 hours after Time 0

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Higher Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray151.7
Lower Dose Fentanyl Sublingual Spray126.4
Placebo149.0

[back to top]

Degree of Motor Blockade Measured as Lowest Recorded Modified Bromage Score

The Modified Bromage Score ranges from 1-5. 1 = complete block, 2 = almost complete block, 3 = partial block, 4 = detectable weakness of hip flexion, and 5 = no detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine. (NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24hrs

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Score of 5Score of 4Score of 3Score of 2Score of 1
Continuous Epidural Infusion2620321
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus379410

[back to top]

Volume of Local Anesthetic Received Through Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Per Hour

The volume of local anesthetic that the patient received through activation of the patient-controlled epidural analgesia system per hour. (NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24hrs

Interventionmilliliters per hour (Median)
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus4.03
Continuous Epidural Infusion4.52

[back to top]

Ratio of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Successful Attempts to Unsuccessful Attempts

Ratio generated by the number of times subjects activates PCEA and receives additional anesthetic compared with times subject activates PCEA and does not receive additional anesthetic. (NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24hrs

Interventionratio of attempts (Median)
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus0.17
Continuous Epidural Infusion0.12

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Experiencing Hypotension Requiring Vasopressor Treatment

Number of patients who needed a vasopressor medication to treat a drop in blood pressure (NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24 hrs

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus8
Continuous Epidural Infusion3

[back to top]

Number of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Attempts

Determined by the number of times subject activates the PCEA pump (NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24hrs

Interventionattempts (Median)
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus0.75
Continuous Epidural Infusion0.63

[back to top]

Maximum Reported Labor Pain Score

Measured using a verbal analog pain scale of 1-10, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain. (NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24hrs

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus3
Continuous Epidural Infusion2

[back to top]

Duration of Second Stage of Labor

(NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24hrs

Interventionminutes (Median)
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus44
Continuous Epidural Infusion63

[back to top]

Volume of Local Anesthetic Required Per Hour

The total volume of local anesthetic that the patient received from the CAPP pump per hour. (NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24hrs

Interventionmilliliters per hour (Median)
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus11.49
Continuous Epidural Infusion12.38

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Were Satisfied With Procedure

"Determined using a 5-point scale where 1=very dissatisfied, 2=dissatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5=very satisfied. Subjects were considered satisfied if selected very satisfied or satisfied on the patient questionnaire." (NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24hrs

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Very satisfiedSatisfied
Continuous Epidural Infusion393
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus359

[back to top]

Total Number of Subjects Experiencing Each Mode of Delivery

Modes of delivery: spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), assisted vaginal delivery (AVD), and caesarean delivery (CD) (NCT02949271)
Timeframe: duration of labor, up to 24hrs

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SVDAVDCD
Continuous Epidural Infusion37517
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus41515

[back to top]

Incidence of Perioperative Cardiac Arrhythmias Evaluated by a Continuous ECG Holter Monitoring in the Perioperative Period

"The investigator evaluates the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias, the type of arrhythmias and whether additional interventions were needed to treat them~Arrhythmias observed:~tachycardia >100 bpm bradycardia < 50 bpm pause (P-P interval > 2 seconds) ventricular extrasystoles (VE) > 1000/ 24 hours supraventricular extrasystoles (SVE) >200/24 hours" (NCT02988219)
Timeframe: 60 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tachycardia < 140 bpm before surgery72559413Tachycardia < 140 bpm before surgery72559414Tachycardia < 140 bpm during surgery72559414Tachycardia < 140 bpm during surgery72559413Tachycardia < 140 bpm after surgery72559413Tachycardia < 140 bpm after surgery72559414Bradycardia before surgery72559414Bradycardia before surgery72559413Bradycardia during surgery72559414Bradycardia during surgery72559413Bradycardia after surgery72559413Bradycardia after surgery72559414Bradycardia in the perioperative period72559414Bradycardia in the perioperative period72559413pause > 2s before surgery72559413pause > 2s before surgery72559414pause > 2s during surgery72559414pause > 2s during surgery72559413pause > 2s after surgery72559414pause > 2s after surgery72559413pause > 2s in the perioperative period72559414pause > 2s in the perioperative period72559413SVE before surgery72559413SVE before surgery72559414SVE during surgery72559413SVE during surgery72559414SVE after surgery72559414SVE after surgery72559413SVE in the perioperativ72559413SVE in the perioperativ72559414VE before surgery72559414VE before surgery72559413VE during surgery72559413VE during surgery72559414VE after surgery72559413VE after surgery72559414VE in the perioperative period72559413VE in the perioperative period72559414Additional intervention needed72559413Additional intervention needed72559414
observednot observed
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)6
General Anesthesia (G)18
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)16
General Anesthesia (G)2
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)5
General Anesthesia (G)22
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)17
General Anesthesia (G)5
General Anesthesia (G)19
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)3
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)19
General Anesthesia (G)14
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)10
General Anesthesia (G)10
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)12
General Anesthesia (G)6
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)4
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)18
General Anesthesia (G)16
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)11
General Anesthesia (G)8
General Anesthesia (G)0
General Anesthesia (G)24
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)2
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)20
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)1
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)21
General Anesthesia (G)1
General Anesthesia (G)23
General Anesthesia (G)3
General Anesthesia (G)21
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)0
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)22

[back to top]

The Prevention of Cardiac Arrhythmias Occurence by Epidural Anesthesia Added to General Anesthesia Evaluated by a Number and Type of Arrhythmias Observed

The investigator evaluates the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias depending on anesthesia method by observing the number and type of arrhythmias and whether additional interventions were needed to treat them (NCT02988219)
Timeframe: 60 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
arrhythmia before surgery72559413arrhythmia before surgery72559414arrhythmia during surgery72559413arrhythmia during surgery72559414arrhythmia after surgery72559413arrhythmia after surgery72559414QTc long > 0.45s before surgery72559413QTc long > 0.45s before surgery72559414QTc long > 0.45s during surgery72559413QTc long > 0.45s during surgery72559414QTc long > 0.45s after surgery72559413QTc long > 0.45s after surgery72559414QTc long > 0.45s in the perioperative time72559413QTc long > 0.45s in the perioperative time72559414Additional intervention needed72559414Additional intervention needed72559413
observednot observed
General Anesthesia (G)3
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)4
General Anesthesia (G)21
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)18
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)12
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)10
General Anesthesia (G)8
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)6
General Anesthesia (G)16
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)16
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)2
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)20
General Anesthesia (G)1
General Anesthesia (G)23
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)8
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)14
General Anesthesia (G)0
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)0
General Anesthesia (G)24
Combined General/Epidural (G/E)22

[back to top]

Perceived Stress (PSS)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 2 days postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)13.08
Epidural12.39

[back to top]

Parenting Self-efficacy (PMP-SE)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Scores range from 20-80, with higher scores indicating higher parenting self-efficacy. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 6 weeks postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)71.45
Epidural71.92

[back to top]

Parenting Self-Efficacy (PMP-SE)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Scores range from 20-80, with higher scores indicating higher parenting self-efficacy. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 3 months postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)73.20
Epidural74.48

[back to top]

Parent-Infant Attachment (MPAS)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Scores range from 19-95, with higher scores indicating higher attachment. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 6 weeks postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)84.09
Epidural87.68

[back to top]

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score (EPDS)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Scores range from 0-30, with higher score indicating higher likelihood of depressive illness. A score of 10 or greater is characterized as possible depression. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)3.53
Epidural3.96

[back to top]

Child Development (ASQ-3) Personal Social Score

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating higher personal-social development. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 3 months postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)45.00
Epidural47.33

[back to top]

Child Development (ASQ-3) Personal Social Score

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Scores range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating higher personal-social development. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 6 weeks postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)43.64
Epidural46.04

[back to top]

Parent-Infant Attachment (MPAS)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Scores range from 19-95, with higher scores indicating higher attachment. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 3 months postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)88.08
Epidural88.70

[back to top]

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score (EPDS)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Scores range from 0-30, with higher score indicating higher likelihood of depressive illness. A score of 10 or greater is characterized as possible depression. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)4.23
Epidural4.71

[back to top]

Number of Participants Currently Breastfeeding at 2 Days Postpartum (Yes/No)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Results represent the percentage of each arm currently breastfeeding at this time point. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 2 Days Postpartum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)22
Epidural18

[back to top]

Number of Participants Currently Breastfeeding at 3 Months Postpartum (Yes/No)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Results represent the percentage of each arm currently breastfeeding at this time point. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 3 months postpartum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)9
Epidural8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Currently Breastfeeding at 6 Weeks Postpartum (Yes/No)

Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Results represent the percentage of each arm currently breastfeeding at this time point. (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 6 weeks postpartum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)15
Epidural12

[back to top]

Pain Score on Average (BPI - Short Form)

"Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Participants only answered this question if answered yes to question: Have you had pain other than everyday kinds of pain today?" (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 2 days postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)4.64
Epidural4.19

[back to top]

Pain Score on Average (BPI - Short Form)

"Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Participants only answered this question if answered yes to question: Have you had pain other than everyday kinds of pain today?" (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 3 months postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)4.50
Epidural2.00

[back to top]

Pain Score on Average (BPI - Short Form)

"Self-completed questionnaire, electronically completed. Pain scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). Participants only answered this question if answered yes to question: Have you had pain other than everyday kinds of pain today?" (NCT03022526)
Timeframe: 6 weeks postpartum

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE)3.00
Epidural4.00

[back to top]

Post Operative Fentanyl Consumption

Post operative administration of fentanyl in micrograms per Kilogram of weight after intra-operative pain management in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (NCT03062488)
Timeframe: first 60 minutes in the PACU

Interventionmicrogram per Kg of weight (Mean)
Opioid Only0.64
Opioid Plus PO Analgesic0.72
Opioid Plus IV Acetaminophen0.58

[back to top]

Post Operative Pain

Measured on scale of 0-10 0-3 = mild pain 4-6 = moderate pain 7-10 = severe pain Tools used for each age subgroup: FLACC Score for patients 24 months to 4 years of age and sedated patients at time of assessment, Wong-Baker FACES for patients between 4 and 7 years of age, and Numeric Pain Scores for patients equal/greater than 7 years of age (NCT03062488)
Timeframe: Average in first 60 minutes of recovery post anesthesia

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Opioid Only2.58
Opioid Plus PO Analgesic2.56
Opioid Plus IV Acetaminophen2.51

[back to top]

Emergence Agitation (EA) as Measured by Standardized PAED Scale

Post Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) Scale 0 - 20. EA defined as a score equal or greater than 12 (NCT03062488)
Timeframe: first 60 minutes of recovery post anesthesia

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Opioid Only5.3
Opioid Plus PO Analgesic4.99
Opioid Plus IV Acetaminophen6.29

[back to top]

Participants With Change in Patient Reported Positional Pain Severity Via the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form

Assess change in patient reported pain severity using the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-sf). (NCT03071744)
Timeframe: from the time of laying down on the hard surface (0 minutes) to 15 minutes after laying down at each fractionation visit.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lazanda4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Change in Patient Reported Positional Pain Intensity

Assess the change in patient reported positional pain intensity (PI) as measured by an 11-point numerical rating scale zero (no pain) to ten (severe pain) (NRS-11; scores on a scale) in cancer patients with bone metastases assessed at each daily palliative radiation fraction. Our primary objective will be measured using the pain intensity difference (PID) of the NRS-11 between 0 minutes and 15 minutes after laying down on the hard surface (PID15= PI0- PI15). (NCT03071744)
Timeframe: 0 minutes and 15 minutes after laying down on the hard surface (PID15= PI0- PI15).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lazanda4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Effects Associated With Lazanda

evaluate adverse effects associated with Lazanda use utilizing the NCI CTCAE version 4.03 before and after palliative radiation. (NCT03071744)
Timeframe: 4-5 weeks of patient participation in the study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Lazanda4

[back to top]

Average Pain as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at 1 Year

"The participant is asked to rate their pain by circling the one number that best describes their pain on the average.~0=no pain and 10 = pain as bad as they can imagine. The higher number indicates worse pain." (NCT03084536)
Timeframe: At 1 year

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Preoperative PECS Blocks0
Placebo PECS Blocks0

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Veterans RAND12 Questionnaire Mental Health Summary Measure

"The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a Physical Health Summary Measure (PCS) and a Mental Health Summary Measure (MCS).~The higher the score the better quality of life.~Scores are standardized to a mean of 50 with a range of -1.465-77.09." (NCT03084536)
Timeframe: At baseline and 1 year post-surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Preoperative PECS Blocks0
Placebo PECS Blocks1.9

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the Veterans RAND12 Questionnaire Physical Health Summary Measure

"The 12 items in the questionnaire correspond to eight principal physical and mental health domains including general health perceptions; physical functioning; role limitations due to physical and emotional problems; bodily pain; energy-fatigue, social functioning and mental health. The 12 items are summarized into two scores, a Physical Health Summary Measure (PCS) and a Mental Health Summary Measure (MCS).~The higher the score the better quality of life.~Scores are standardized to a mean of 50 with a range of -0.809-70.71." (NCT03084536)
Timeframe: At baseline and 1 year post-surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Preoperative PECS Blocks-3.1
Placebo PECS Blocks-0.8

[back to top]

Worst Pain as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at 1 Year

"The participant is asked to rate their pain by circling the one number that best describes their pain at its worst in the past week.~0=no pain and 10 = pain as bad as they can imagine. The higher number indicates worse pain." (NCT03084536)
Timeframe: At 1 year

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Preoperative PECS Blocks0
Placebo PECS Blocks0

[back to top]

Interference as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at 1 Year

"The participant is asked circle the one number that describes how much, during the past week pain has interfered with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work (includes both work outside the home and housework), relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.~0=does not interference and 10 = completely interferes. The higher number indicates more interference from pain.~The scores for each subsection will be averaged." (NCT03084536)
Timeframe: At 1 year

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Preoperative PECS Blocks0
Placebo PECS Blocks0

[back to top]

Amount of Discomfort

Change in discomfort following oocyte retrieval with standardized anesthesia management as measured by verbal analogue scoring (0-10 scale). VAS scores correlate to minimal (VAS 0-3), moderate (VAS 4-6) or severe (VAS ≥7) discomfort. (NCT03105518)
Timeframe: PACU admission, 15, 30 and 60 min postprocedure, postoperative day 3

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Time 0; ≤10 FolliclesTime 0; > 10 FolliclesTime 15; ≤10 FolliclesTime 15; >10 FolliclesTime 30; ≤10 FolliclesTime 30; >10 FolliclesTime 60; ≤10 FolliclesTime 60; >10 FolliclesTime POD 3; ≤ 10 FolliclesTime POD 3; > 10 Follicles
Analgesia Options1.533.252.683.611.662.930.972.191.441.64

[back to top]

Amount of Discomfort Following Discharge Until Embryo Transfer

Change in discomfort following oocyte retrieval with standardized anesthesia management as measured by verbal analogue scoring (0-10 scale) after immediate postoperative period (1 hrs) but prior to Embryo Transfer on 3rd postoperative day. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores correlate to minimal (VAS 0-3), moderate (VAS 4-6) or severe (VAS ≥7) discomfort. Patients will record the type, dose, and timing of pain medicines in a diary to be returned at Embryo Transfer. (NCT03105518)
Timeframe: After 1 hrs but less than 3 days

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
POD1; ≤10 FolliPOD1; >10 FolliclesPOD2; ≤10 FolliPOD2; >10 Folli
Analgesia Options2.153.211.282.50

[back to top]

Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS)

Postoperative Visual Analog Pain Score following lumbar fusion surgery. VAS on the scale 0 to 100 (0= no pain, 100= worst pain). (NCT03115151)
Timeframe: VAS score at postoperative 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia40.23
Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia54.27

[back to top]

Postoperative Recovery Time - Ambulation

"To assess whether a D/M combination increases postoperative recovery time when compared the MFP combination.~a. Time to ambulation (to recovery room) will be recorded" (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: After the procedure until ambulation, up to 20 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Propofol Group10.8
Dexmedetomidine Group11.6

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

"Visual Analog Scale was used to measure overall satisfaction with the IV sedation and memory of the procedure.~The minimum score is 0 (not satisfied at all) to a maximum score of 100 (completely satisfied).~A higher score is a better outcome." (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: 30 minutes following surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Propofol Group93.5
Dexmedetomidine Group86.6

[back to top]

Hemodynamic Stability - Blood Pressure

"To compare the differences in hemodynamic stability using a D/M combination compared to the MFP combination. (In this study, a deviation from baseline by 20% or greater will be considered clinically significant)~a. Change in blood pressure (NIBP) (change ≥ 20%) Blood pressure is presented as mean arterial pressure" (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: During the procedure, up to 40 minutes

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Propofol Group78
Dexmedetomidine Group88

[back to top]

Cooperation Scale

Surgeon satisfaction is measured by the Cooperation Scale. Minimum score of 0 and maximum of 9. Higher indicates a worse outcome (i.e., discomfort and movement) (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: 15 minutes following surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Propofol Group2.07
Dexmedetomidine Group1.47

[back to top]

Hemodynamic Stability - Heart Rate

"To compare the differences in hemodynamic stability using a D/M combination compared to the MFP combination. (In this study, a deviation from baseline of both the blood pressure and heart rate by 20% or greater will be considered clinically significant)~a. Change in heart rate (change ≥ 20 BPM)" (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: During the procedure, up to 40 minutes

Interventionbeats per minute (Mean)
Propofol Group77
Dexmedetomidine Group62

[back to top]

Respiratory Depression - Respiratory Rate

"To assess whether a D/M combination leads to a significant change in respiratory depression compared to the MFP combination.~a. Change in respiratory rate (change ≥ 20%)" (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: During the procedure, up to 40 minutes

Interventionbreaths per minute (Mean)
Propofol Group18
Dexmedetomidine Group18

[back to top]

Surgeon Satisfaction - Survey

"Surgeon satisfaction was measured by the surgeon grading the Operating Conditions scale.~The minimum value was 0 and the maximum was 3. 0=very poor, 1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good" (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: 15 minutes following surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Propofol Group2.8
Dexmedetomidine Group2.9

[back to top]

Respiratory Events Requiring Intervention

To compare the groups regarding the number of respiratory events requiring intervention, described as: Chin lift/jaw thrust, Tongue thrust, Yankauer suctioning, Positive pressure oxygen administration, Placement of an oral or nasal airway. (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: During surgery

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Propofol Group17
Dexmedetomidine Group2

[back to top]

Respiratory Depression - Oxygen Saturation

"To assess whether a D/M combination leads to a significant change in respiratory depression compared to the MFP combination.~a. Change in arterial oxygen saturation (as measured by pulse oximeter) i. number of events of ≤92%" (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: During the procedure, up to 40 minutes

InterventionSaturation percent (Mean)
Propofol Group98.7
Dexmedetomidine Group98.9

[back to top]

Reaction to Administration of Local Anesthesia

"To compare the groups regarding movement of the patient during the first injection of local anesthesia during the IVS at time of injection measured using the Behavioral Pain Scale - Non-Intubated patients.~The minimum value is 3 and the maximum value is 12. Higher scores mean a worse outcome (i.e., more pain and movement on injection)" (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: During the first injection of local anesthesia during surgery

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Propofol Group3.9
Dexmedetomidine Group4.2

[back to top]

Postoperative Recovery Time - Time to Discharge

"To assess whether a D/M combination increases postoperative recovery time when compared the MFP combination.~a. Time to discharge or virtual discharge (comparative statistic) - Aldrete score of ≥ 9 or pre-procedure score is met The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 10. A higher score indicates wakefulness, hemodynamically stable, and able to ambulate.~ii. All subjects are required to stay a minimum of 30 minutes after the end of the procedure. Therefore, at least two postoperative vital sign readings will be obtained. If the subject meets discharge criteria prior to 30 minutes, this time will be the virtual discharge time" (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: After the procedure until discharge, up to 45 minutes

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Propofol Group26.5
Dexmedetomidine Group29.9

[back to top]

Postoperative Recovery Time - Duration of Procedure

"To assess whether a D/M combination increases postoperative recovery time when compared the MFP combination.~a. Duration of procedure will be recorded" (NCT03255824)
Timeframe: During the procedure, up to 40 minutes

InterventionMINUTES (Mean)
Propofol Group24.2
Dexmedetomidine Group22.1

[back to top]

Average Pain Interference

Minimum is 0, maximum is 10. 10 indicates highest pain interference. (NCT03307174)
Timeframe: While epidural in place (up to 72 hours postoperatively)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
24 hours postoperatively24 - 48 hours postoperatively48 - 72 hours postoperatively
Continuous Epidural Infusion212
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus311

[back to top]

Total Local Anesthetic Utilized in First 24 Hours

Total local anesthetic consumed while epidural in place, recorded on infusion pump (NCT03307174)
Timeframe: In first 24 hours

Interventionmg (Median)
Continuous Epidural Infusion126
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus123

[back to top]

Worst Reported 24 Hour Pain

Minimum is 0, maximum is 10. 10 indicates highest pain severity. (NCT03307174)
Timeframe: While epidural in place (up to 72 hours postoperatively)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
24 hours postoperatively24 - 48 hours postoperatively48 - 72 hours postoperativley
Continuous Epidural Infusion567
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus866

[back to top]

Total Opioid Consumed

Total opioid consumed (intravenous or po) while epidural in place (NCT03307174)
Timeframe: While epidural in place (up to 72 hours post operatively)

,
InterventionMME (Median)
24 hours postoperatively24 - 48 hours postoperatively48 - 72 hrs postoperatively
Continuous Epidural Infusion1200
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus1601

[back to top]

Incidence of Hypotension

Most common side effect post-operatively with epidural anesthesia. Documented by recorded vitals signs, fluid resuscitation, and temporary cessation of epidural medication. (NCT03307174)
Timeframe: While epidural in place (24 hours postoperatively)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Continuous Epidural Infusion9
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus18

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction Score

"Ranked patient satisfaction scores while epidural in place. Measured by modified pain inventory.~Minimum is 0, maximum of 10. 10 indicates highest patient satisfaction." (NCT03307174)
Timeframe: While epidural in place (up to 72 hours postoperatively)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
24 hours postoperatively24 - 48 hours postoperatively48 - 72 hours postoperatively
Continuous Epidural Infusion999
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus899

[back to top]

Average Pain Severity

Measured by modified pain inventory on a daily basis while epidural in place. Minimum is 0, maximum is 10. 10 indicates highest pain severity. (NCT03307174)
Timeframe: While epidural in place (up to 72 hours postoperatively)

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
24 hours postoperatively24 - 48 hours postoperatively48 - 72 hours postoperatively
Continuous Epidural Infusion333
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus523

[back to top]

Evaluation of Pain Intensity - Mean Pain Score During Procedure

Evaluation of subject reported pain intensity scores according to the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0-10) (NCT03348423)
Timeframe: Up to 4 Hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
DEX-IN 50 µg3.03
Fentanyl 50 µg3.10
Placebo4.25

[back to top]

Amount of Supplemental Oxycodone Used

Cumulative opioid pain medication used in the first 24 hours postoperatively as recorded in the medical record (NCT03383588)
Timeframe: 4-24 hours post operative

Interventionmg of supplemental oxycodone (Mean)
Bupivacaine 0.25%19
Bupivacaine 0.25% + Epinephrine25
Saline Solution23

[back to top]

Muscle Spasm

% of patients w/ muscle spasm (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative days 0-2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)80
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)55.6
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)100
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)44.4
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)71.4

[back to top]

Maximum Pain Score

"Mean of Maximum Pain Score POD 0-2~Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Pain Scale (FLACC) for children 1-3 years of age, Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) for children over age 3 and the Numeric scale (0-10) for children over age 7.~minimum value = 0, maximum value 10 (higher score is worse)" (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Days 0-2

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)5.5
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)4.3
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)6.4
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)5.5
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)6.5

[back to top]

Nausea

% of patients with nausea (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Days 0-2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)40
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)33.3
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)71.4
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)55.6
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)71.4

[back to top]

Itching

% of patients with itching (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Days 0-2

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)40
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)33.3
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)28.6
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)22.2
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)42.9

[back to top]

Hospital Length of Stay

Total hospital length of stay (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Through hospital stay, an average of 2-3 days.

Interventiondays (Mean)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)1.9
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)2
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)2.9
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)2.5
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)3.2

[back to top]

Total Perioperative Morphine Equivalents

All administered opioids measured as morphine equivalents (mg/kg) (NCT03435692)
Timeframe: Post-Operative Days 0-2

Interventionmg/kg (Mean)
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (< 6 Years Old)0.54
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (< 6 Years Old)0.7
Lumbar Epidural Catheter (6 Years and Older)0.85
Lumbar Plexus Catheter (6 Years and Older)0.83
Patient Controlled Analgesia (6 Years and Older)2.23

[back to top]

Change in Medication

Number of participants that had increases or decreases in the dose or frequency of pain medication (NCT03523000)
Timeframe: Assessing any changes in pain medications from baseline (Day 1) through the 12-month post-implant clinic follow up

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Active Solution Followed by Inactive Place Solution0
Inactive Placebo Solution Followed by Active Solution3

[back to top]

Change in Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (NRS) With Activity

Numerical Rating Scale is an 11-point pain scale whereby 0 signifies no pain and 10 the worse pain ever (NCT03523000)
Timeframe: Comparing change in NRS from baseline (Day 1) to: end of intrathecal infusion of solution 1 (Day 2), end of intrathecal infusion of solution 2 (Day 3)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 2)End of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 3)
Active Solution Followed by Inactive Placebo Solution8.404.134.38
Inactive Placebo Solution Followed by Active Solution8.004.196.73

[back to top]

Adverse Event (AE)

AE is any untoward medical occurrence in the patient which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this infusion treatment (NCT03523000)
Timeframe: Assessing any AEs that occur from baseline (Day 1) through the 12-month post-implant clinic follow up

InterventionAdverse events (Number)
All Study Participants9

[back to top]

Change in Oswestry Disability Score (ODI)

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) This scale based on a questionnaire of activities measures the impact of pain on multiple factors within a patient's daily life. Higher values represent worse outcomes, or a higher impact from pain on the patient's daily life. The total score range is 0-50. Subcategories include: 0-4: no disability. 5-14: mild disability. 15-24: moderate disability. 25-34: sever disability. 35-50: completely disabled. (NCT03523000)
Timeframe: Comparing change in ODI from baseline (Day 1) to: end of intrathecal infusion of solution 2 (Day 3)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 3)
Active Solution Followed by Inactive Placebo Solution27.1320.38
Inactive Placebo Solution Followed by Active Solution26.8127.07

[back to top]

Change in painDETECT Final

The painDETECT questionnaire was specifically developed to detect neuropathic pain components in adult patients with low back pain. PainDETECT is a scale 0 to 38, with 0 being no disability to 38 being max disability. (NCT03523000)
Timeframe: Comparing change in PainDETECT from baseline (Day 1) to: end of intrathecal infusion of solution 2 (Day 3)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 3)
Active Solution Followed by Inactive Placebo Solution16.410.81
Inactive Placebo Solution Followed by Active Solution13.3115.27

[back to top]

Change in painDETECT Total

The painDETECT questionnaire was specifically developed to detect neuropathic pain components in adult patients with low back pain. PainDETECT is a scale of 0 to 35, with 0 being no disability to 35 being max disability. (NCT03523000)
Timeframe: Comparing change in PainDETECT from baseline (Day 1) to: end of intrathecal infusion of solution 2 (Day 3)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 3)
Active Solution Followed by Inactive Placebo Solution15.04710.19
Inactive Placebo Solution Followed by Active Solution11.9414.27

[back to top]

Change in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale is a seven-point single-item scale ranging from 7 'very much worse' to 1 'very much improved'. (NCT03523000)
Timeframe: Comparing change in PGIC from end of intrathecal infusion of solution 1 (Day 2), to end of intrathecal infusion of solution 2 (Day 3)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
End of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 2)End of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 3)
Active Solution Followed by Inactive Placebo Solution4.534.07
Inactive Placebo Solution Followed by Active Solution4.662.48

[back to top]

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ)

TSQ is a questionnaire to rate level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the Intrathecal Drug Delivery- patients were asked preference for either intrathecal solution. Patient preferences for each solution were measured. This data represents the total number of patient's that received a trial and the total number of patients who preferred each solution. Higher values indicate a greater number of study participants preferred a specific arm. Patients with no preference are listed separately. (NCT03523000)
Timeframe: Up to one year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Intrathecal Infusion 1- Sequence 1Intrathecal Infusion 2- Sequence 1No preference- Sequence1Intrathecal Infusion 1- Sequence 2Intrathecal Infusion 2- Sequence 2No preference- Sequence 2
All Study Participants11225110

[back to top]

Change in Numerical Rating Scale Pain Scores (NRS) at Rest

Numerical Rating Scale is an 11-point pain scale whereby 0 signifies no pain and 10 the worse pain ever (NCT03523000)
Timeframe: Comparing change in NRS from baseline (Day 1) to: end of intrathecal infusion of solution 1 (Day 2), end of intrathecal infusion of solution 2 (Day 3)

,
InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 2)End of intrathecal infusion of solution (Day 3)
Active Solution Followed by Inactive Placebo Solution6.53.674.25
Inactive Placebo Solution Followed by Active Solution6.753.696.73

[back to top]

Change in Vitals

Proportion of children who have any significant change in vitals during analgosedation (any desaturation - Oxygen saturation < 90, and hypotension per age-related norms) will be compared between the two groups. (NCT03528512)
Timeframe: up to 30 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IN Ketamine0
IN Midazolam and Fentanyl0

[back to top]

Nurse and Physician Satisfaction

Nurse and physician satisfaction will be assessed by a survey which will be filled in the end of the sedation. Response to overall experience question score on Likert scale where 1 is poor and 5 is Excellent. Proportion of responders giving answers of 4 or 5 will be calculated. (NCT03528512)
Timeframe: Up to 30 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IN Ketamine1
IN Midazolam and Fentanyl4

[back to top]

Pain Scores During Laceration Repair

The effect of IN ketamine vs IN midazolam + IN fentanyl on pain scores during laceration repair using either Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale or Faces Scale pain scale depending for patient age, each a Likert scale from 0 being no pain to 10 being worst pain, median scores for each group (NCT03528512)
Timeframe: Up to 30 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
IN Ketamine4
IN Midazolam and Fentanyl0

[back to top]

Rates of Failure

Rates of failure to repair laceration due to agitation or intolerable pain with the switch to intravenous medications will be compared between two groups. Percentage failure will be reported. (NCT03528512)
Timeframe: Up to 30 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IN Ketamine0
IN Midazolam and Fentanyl0

[back to top]

Sedation Score

The primary outcome variable is the maximum sedation score as measured by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale. This scale consists of an ordinal scale from 0 being awake and alert and 4 being unarousable. Medians will be calculated for each group. (NCT03528512)
Timeframe: up to 30 minutes

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
IN Ketamine1
IN Midazolam and Fentanyl1

[back to top]

Proportion of Children With Maximum Sedation Score

The proportion of children who receive a maximum sedation score of either 1 or 2 (without distinguishing between those values) (NCT03528512)
Timeframe: Up to 30 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IN Ketamine2
IN Midazolam and Fentanyl2

[back to top]

Total Opioid Consumption

The sum of daily opioid consumption (in morphine equivalents) (NCT03789318)
Timeframe: 0 to 96 hours

Interventionmg morphine equivalents (Mean)
CA-008 5 mg (0.05 mg/mL) Cohort 185.83
Placebo for Cohort 196.67
CA-008 10 mg (0.1 mg/mL)69.77
CA-008 15 mg (0.15 mg/mL)58.00
Placebo for Cohorts 2 and 377.85

[back to top]

Weighted Sum of Pain Intensity (SPI) Assessments = AUC of NRS Scores

Pain intensity scores (using a Numeric Rating Scale of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable) from 0 to T96 hours (NCT03789318)
Timeframe: 0 to 96 hours

Interventionscore on a scale*hours (Mean)
CA-008 5 mg (0.05 mg/mL) Cohort 1392.98
Placebo for Cohort 1392.67
CA-008 10 mg (0.1 mg/mL)384.94
CA-008 15 mg (0.15 mg/mL)406.88
Placebo for Cohorts 2 and 3356.23

[back to top]

Percent of Opioid Free Subjects

Percent of subjects who were opioid free at 0-96 hours (NCT03789318)
Timeframe: 0 to 96 hours

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CA-008 5 mg (0.05 mg/mL) Cohort 10
Placebo for Cohort 10
CA-008 10 mg (0.1 mg/mL)1
CA-008 15 mg (0.15 mg/mL)1
Placebo for Cohorts 2 and 30

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 96 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 96 hours (NCT03789318)
Timeframe: 96 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 5 mg (0.05 mg/mL) Cohort 12.8
Placebo for Cohort 12.0
CA-008 10 mg (0.1 mg/mL)3.0
CA-008 15 mg (0.15 mg/mL)2.8
Placebo for Cohorts 2 and 31.8

[back to top]

Time to Opioid Cessation or Freedom

Time to the last use of opioid (NCT03789318)
Timeframe: From Surgery to Day 17

Interventionhours (Median)
CA-008 5 mg (0.05 mg/mL) Cohort 156.37
Placebo for Cohort 155.42
CA-008 10 mg (0.1 mg/mL)83.89
CA-008 15 mg (0.15 mg/mL)59.55
Placebo for Cohorts 2 and 342.26

[back to top]

Number of Needle Passes Required to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow

Needle pass is any forward introduction of the spinal needle after its complete or incomplete withdrawal, including the first attempt. (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes

Interventionneedle passes (Median)
Ultrasonography3
Palpation3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Failed Spinal Block

Number of participants with failed spinal block defined as an upper sensory level below T6 assessed by pinprick. (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 20 minutes after intrathecal injection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ultrasonography3
Palpation4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Paresthesia

Number of participants with paresthesia reported by the subjects during performing the spinal procedure (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ultrasonography16
Palpation17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Vascular Puncture

Number of participants with unintentional vascular puncture by the needle during performing the spinal procedure (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ultrasonography9
Palpation9

[back to top]

Number of Skin Punctures Required to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow

Skin puncture is any separate skin puncture by the spinal needle after its complete withdrawal, including the first attempt. (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes

Interventionskin punctures (Median)
Ultrasonography1
Palpation1

[back to top]

Patient Satisfaction

Patient satisfaction from the procedure assessed immediately after intrathecal injection using a 5-point scale (1 = very unsatisfied; 2 = unsatisfied; 3 = fair; 4 = satisfied; and 5 = very satisfied). (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed at 1 minute after intrathecal injection

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Ultrasonography5
Palpation4

[back to top]

Rate of Successful Obtaining of Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow at the First Needle Pass

Needle pass is any forward introduction of the spinal needle after its complete or incomplete withdrawal, including the first attempt. (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ultrasonography40
Palpation45

[back to top]

Rate of Successful Obtaining of Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow at the First Skin Puncture

Skin puncture is any separate skin puncture by the spinal needle after its complete withdrawal, including the first attempt. (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ultrasonography108
Palpation111

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Failure to Obtain Free Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow

Number of participants with failure to obtain free cerebrospinal fluid flow after adequate needle passes at 6 separate skin punctures. (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed from starting the first attempt of spinal anesthesia until successful administration of spinal anesthesia, an average of 10 minutes

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ultrasonography0
Palpation0

[back to top]

Duration of the Spinal Procedure

The duration from starting the first skin puncture by the spinal needle to obtaining free CSF flow (NCT03792191)
Timeframe: Assessed from enrollment in the study until completion of cesarean delivery

Interventionseconds (Median)
Ultrasonography76
Palpation59

[back to top]

Plasmatic Glucose Levels (mg/dl).

Change of baseline glucose levels within the first 12 postoperative hours. (NCT03809182)
Timeframe: Baseline levels(T0) and at hour 2(T1), 4(T2), 6(T3), 8(T4), 10(T5), and 12(T6) after the onset of bolus and infusion of dexmedetomidine

,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Baseline level (T0)Hour 2 (T1)Hour 4 (T2)Hour 6 (T3)Hour 8 (T4)Hour 10 (T5)Hour 12 (T6)
0.9% Sodium-chloride82111129120118117117
Dexmedetomidine80114124131122130125

[back to top]

Sedation-agitation Scores in the First 12 Postoperative Hours.

Sedation-agitation scale (SAS), ranging from 1 to 7 (1=unarousable, 2=very sedated, 3=sedated, 4=calm and cooperative, 5=agitated, 6=very agitated and 7=dangerous agitation). (NCT03809182)
Timeframe: At postoperative hours 2(T1), 4(T2), 6(T3), 8(T4), 10(T5) and 12(T6).

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Hour 2 (T1)Hour 4 (T2)Hour 6 (T3)Hour 8 (T4)Hour 10 (T5)Hour 12 (T6)
0.9% Sodium-chloride444444
Dexmedetomidine344444

[back to top]

Amount (mg) of Morphine Consumed.

Morphine consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours. (NCT03809182)
Timeframe: At 24h postoperative hours.

Interventionmg (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine26
0.9% Sodium-chloride18.4

[back to top]

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

Number of patients with postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first 12 postoperative hours. (NCT03809182)
Timeframe: Postoperative nausea and vomiting during the first 12 postoperative hours.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dexmedetomidine16
0.9% Sodium-chloride19

[back to top]

Fentanyl Consumption.

Amount of fentanyl (ug/kg) intraoperatively administered. (NCT03809182)
Timeframe: Since the beginning of anesthesia until the end of it, an average of one hour and a half.

Interventionmcg/kg (Mean)
Dexmedetomidine6.0
0.9% Sodium-chloride7

[back to top]

Pain Scores in the First 24 Postoperative Hours.

Visual analogue scale (VAS), provided by patients, ranging from 0 to 10 (0= no pain and 10= worst possible pain). We considered a pain score between 1-3, 4-6 and 7-10 as mild, moderate and severe pain, respectively. (NCT03809182)
Timeframe: At postoperative hours 2(T1), 4(T2), 6(T3), 8(T4), 10(T5), 12(T6) and 24(T7).

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Hour 2 (T1) Pain at restHour 2 (T1) Pain at movementHour 4 (T2) Pain at restHour 4 (T2) Pain at movementHour 6 (T3) Pain at restHour 6 (T3) Pain at movementHour 8 (T4) Pain at restHour 8 (T4) Pain at movementHour 10 (T5) Pain at restHour 10 (T5) Pain at movementHour 12 (T6) Pain at restHour 12 (T6) Pain at movementHour 24 (T7) Pain at restHour 24 (T7) Pain at movement
0.9% Sodium-chloride00342414131303
Dexmedetomidine00453434353323

[back to top]

Plasmatic Insulin Levels (uU/ml).

Change of baseline insulin levels within the first 12 postoperative hours. (NCT03809182)
Timeframe: Baseline levels(T0) and at hour 2(T1), 4(T2), 6(T3), 8(T4), 10(T5), and 12(T6) after the onset of bolus and infusion of dexmedetomidine

,
InterventionuU/dl (Mean)
Baseline level (T0)Hour 2 (T1)Hour 4 (T2)Hour 6 (T3)Hour 8 (T4)Hour 10 (T5)Hour 12 (T6)
0.9% Sodium-chloride11.219.930.32321.52425.9
Dexmedetomidine10.511.816.716.816.61616.6

[back to top]

NRS Pain Score After Irrigation

Patient reported NRS pain scores after Irrigation. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once anytime up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl3.4
Placebo2.6

[back to top]

NRS Pain Score After Lidocaine Injection

Patient reported NRS pain scores after Lidocaine injection. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Following Lidocaine injection measured once anytime up to 12 minutes after intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl8.4
Placebo8.0

[back to top]

NRS Pain Score After Packing of Abscess

Patient reported pain after Packing of abscess. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once at the time of completion of application of the bandage, up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl4.5
Placebo3.9

[back to top]

NRS Pain Score Following Incision

Patient reported NRS pain scores following Incision. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once anytime up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl3.9
Placebo3.9

[back to top]

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score at Baseline

Patient reported pain scores at baseline. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl8.3
Placebo8.1

[back to top]

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score for Overall Procedure

Patient reported pain scores for overall Procedure assessed immediately after placement of dressing at the end of procedure. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once following placement of dressing at completion of procedure, up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl6.2
Placebo7.0

[back to top]

NRS Pain Score After Blunt Dissection

Patient reported NRS pain scores after Blunt Dissection. The NRS for pain is a reliable and validated measure of pain intensity ranging from 0 - no pain, to 10 - worst pain imaginable. (NCT03872700)
Timeframe: Measured once anytime up to 60 minutes following intranasal administration

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Intranasal Fentanyl4.1
Placebo4.4

[back to top]

Electroencephalogram

Brain electrical activity: observation is for brain region specific abnormal or seizure activity. Number of participants with abnormal EEG are reported. (NCT03882788)
Timeframe: EEG taken immediately prior to surgery, during surgery, during cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) stay (up to 48 hours after surgery), and immediately prior to discharge (between 5 to 20 minutes to assess EEG at each time point)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Abnormal preoperative EEGAbnormal intraoperative EEGAbnormal EEG in CVICUAbnormal EEG predischarge
Narcotic Based Anesthesia0100
Volatile Anesthesia0110

[back to top]

Bayley III

Neurodevelopmental assessment scores are age dependent and based motor and behavioral abilities, often reported for normal or abnormal for age. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition, (Bayley III) is an instrument designed to measure the developmental functioning of infants and toddlers between the ages of 1 month and 42 months (age adjustments for prematurity are accommodated with the tool). It provides age specific composite scores for cognitive (91 items, score min 55 max 145), language (98 items, score min 47 max 153), and motor (138 items, score min 46 max 154) skills. For all scales, higher scores are better and lower scores indicate possible delay/deficit. (NCT03882788)
Timeframe: Assessed once between age 18 to 48 months (approximately 2 hours to assess), up to 48 months from study start

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cognitive Standard ScoreLanguage Standard ScoreMotor Standard Score
Narcotic Based Anesthesia918897
Volatile Anesthesia939090

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 72 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 72 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 72 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 11.2
CA-008 Cohort 20.3
CA-008 Cohort 32.0
Exparel4.6

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 48 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 48 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 11.3
CA-008 Cohort 20.6
CA-008 Cohort 32.7
Exparel4.8

[back to top]

Pain Intensity Scores at 24 Hours at Rest Using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable at 24 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 24 hours

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 10.6
CA-008 Cohort 21.7
CA-008 Cohort 35.1
Exparel6.0

[back to top]

Opioid Consumption

Summary of opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours

Interventionmg morphine equivalents (Mean)
CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 110.83
CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 23.33
CA-008 (Vocacapsaicin) Cohort 338.33
Exparel80.83

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores (at Rest) Over 72h

Area Under the Curve of pain intensity scores (using a Numeric Rating Scale of pain intensity from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable) over 72 hours (NCT03885596)
Timeframe: 0-72 hours

Interventionscore on a scale*hour (Mean)
CA-008 Cohort 172.30
CA-008 Cohort 266.24
CA-008 Cohort 3203.76
Exparel306.58

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Significant Episode of Hypotension

Characterize the safety profile of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine when administered alone or in combination to children receiving mechanical ventilation. (NCT03938857)
Timeframe: up to 28 days or until discharge from the ICU (whichever is first)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fen. SOC+Saline Placebo (Bolus+Infusion)2
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .25mcg/kg/hr)5
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .5mcg/kg/hr)3

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing SAEs (Serious Adverse Events)

(NCT03938857)
Timeframe: up to 28 days or until discharge from the ICU (whichever is first)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fen. SOC+Saline Placebo (Bolus+Infusion)0
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .25mcg/kg/hr)2
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .5mcg/kg/hr)1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Significant Episode of Urinary Retention

Characterize the safety profile of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine when administered alone or in combination to children receiving mechanical ventilation. (NCT03938857)
Timeframe: up to 28 days or until discharge from the ICU (whichever is first)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fen. SOC+Saline Placebo (Bolus+Infusion)1
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .25mcg/kg/hr)2
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .5mcg/kg/hr)1

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Significant Episode of Bradycardia

Characterize the safety profile of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine when administered alone or in combination to children receiving mechanical ventilation. (NCT03938857)
Timeframe: up to 28 days or until discharge from the ICU (whichever is first)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fen. SOC+Saline Placebo (Bolus+Infusion)2
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .25mcg/kg/hr)3
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .5mcg/kg/hr)1

[back to top]

Mean Daily Dose of Fentanyl in mcg/kg/hr (Micrograms Per Kilogram Per Hour)

Characterize the opioid-sparing effect of dexmedetomidine when co-administered with fentanyl in children receiving mechanical ventilation. Characterization of differences between dosing exposures for the four groups will allow estimation of the opioid-sparing effect of dexmedetomidine. (NCT03938857)
Timeframe: through day 7 of mechanical ventilation or initial extubation (whichever is first)

Interventionmcg/kg/hr (Mean)
Fen. SOC+Saline Placebo (Bolus+Infusion)2.25
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .25mcg/kg/hr)2.68
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .5mcg/kg/hr)3.23

[back to top]

Mean Number of SAEs (Serious Adverse Events) Experienced by Participants

(NCT03938857)
Timeframe: up to 28 days or until discharge from the ICU (whichever is first)

Interventionserious adverse events (Mean)
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .25mcg/kg/hr)1
Fen. SOC+Dex.(.5mcg/kg + .5mcg/kg/hr)1

[back to top]

Pressure Pain Tolerance

Pain assessments will be conducted using a digital algometer to obtain maximum pain thresholds caused by pressure. This pain assessment technique is conducted by applying the tip of a hand-held digital algometer on the subject's digit. Force is gradually increased and the peak force is recorded when the subject first reports a painful sensation. Removal of the pressure from the algometer immediately relieves the painful sensation and the subject can voluntarily stop the test at any time. This assessment will be performed after the subject has received placebo and fentanyl. (NCT04136548)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionKilograms (Median)
Fentanyl1.6
Placebo1.1

[back to top]

Cumulative Stress Index

Tolerance to a simulated hemorrhagic challenge will be assessed, for both the placebo and fentanyl limbs, by causing progressive central hypovolemia via lower-body negative pressure (LBNP). This progressive lower-body negative pressure challenge will be performed until the onset of syncopal symptoms (defined as: profound bradycardia, a precipitous drop in arterial blood pressure and accompanying narrowing of pulse pressure, a sustained systolic blood pressure less than 80 mmHg, and/or subjective symptoms such as light-headedness, sweating, nausea, or dizziness). The primary variable will be the quantification of lower-body negative pressure that is required to cause these symptoms. This quantification will be objectively measured via a cumulative stress index which is calculated as the sum of the product of the LBNP level and the duration of each level, until test termination (i.e., 40 mmHg x 3 min + 50 mmHg x 3 min, etc). (NCT04136548)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionmmHg x minutes (Mean)
Fentanyl647
Placebo676

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Number of serious adverse events (grades 3, 4, and 5) experienced by each group (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionSAEs (Number)
Sublingual Sufentanil0
IV Fentanyl0

[back to top]

Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS)

Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS) is a 7-item multi-dimensional survey that assesses analgesia benefits. Items are scored on a scale from 0 (minimal) to 4 (maximal). Total score is a sum of the 7 item scores with question 7 scored as 4 minus the patient reported number. Total scores range from 0 to 28 with lower scores representing greater benefit from analgesic therapy. (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Sublingual Sufentanil3.0
IV Fentanyl3.0

[back to top]

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

Number of participants in each arm who are treated for nausea and/or vomiting. (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sublingual Sufentanil4
IV Fentanyl7

[back to top]

Recovery Room Time

The time (reported in minutes) from when the patient arrives in the PACU, right after surgery, to the time that all discharge criteria are met. (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionminutes (Median)
Sublingual Sufentanil73.0
IV Fentanyl65.0

[back to top]

Rescue Milligram Morphine Equivalents (Opioid Use After Intervention Until Discharge)

All doses of opioid medications administered following initial dosage (sufentanil or fentanyl depending on study arm) will be converted to milligram morphine equivalents and summed for reporting. (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

Interventionmilligram morphine equivalents (Median)
Sublingual Sufentanil15.0
IV Fentanyl22.5

[back to top]

Supplemental Oxygen

Number of participants in each arm who require supplemental oxygen therapy (NCT04177862)
Timeframe: 1 day

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sublingual Sufentanil4
IV Fentanyl4

[back to top]

Time to Fitness for PACU Discharge

This will be determined per facility protocol-scheduled assessments using the CCF Phase II Discharge Scoring tool. The time that the minimum acceptable score of 14 is achieved will be recorded (NCT04561375)
Timeframe: 1 - 2 hours.

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Intervention Group120
Control Group114

[back to top]

Total Consumption of Fentanyl in PACU

The total amount of fentanyl consumed in PACU. (NCT04561375)
Timeframe: About 3 hours in PACU

Interventionµg (Median)
Intervention Group0
Control Group25

[back to top]

Phase 1 Recovery Time

Recovery will be considered complete at the time an order is placed for progression to phase II. (NCT04561375)
Timeframe: 1.5 hours

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Intervention Group77
Control Group66

[back to top]

Provider Satisfaction With Anesthesia Assessed by the VAS

After the procedure, research personnel will assess provider's satisfaction with patient's anesthesia on a 100mm visual analog scale. The minimum score is 0mm and the maximum score if 100mm, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. (NCT04871425)
Timeframe: Immediately postoperatively

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine90
Fentanyl86.8

[back to top]

Satisfaction With Anesthesia Assessed by the ISAS

After the procedure, either at time of discharge (if less than 30 minutes) or at 30 minutes (if not yet discharged), research personnel will assess the participant's satisfaction with anesthesia using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale. This is a validated perioperative anesthesia satisfaction scale with a minimum score of -3 and a maximum score of +3 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. (NCT04871425)
Timeframe: At discharge or 30 minutes after the procedure

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Ketamine2.4
Fentanyl2.2

[back to top]

Postoperative Pain Assessed by the VAS

Patients will complete 2 followup surveys asking about their postoperative pain after discharge. This will be assessed on a 100mm visual analog scale. The minimum score is 0mm and the maximum score if 100mm, with higher scores indicating higher pain levels. (NCT04871425)
Timeframe: 24 hours postoperatively and 7 days postoperatively

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Pain post-op day 1Pain post-op day 7
Fentanyl2219.1
Ketamine24.518.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants Administered Additional Pain Medications

After the procedure, research personnel will ask anesthetist what medications, if any, they gave outside of the study protocol (NCT04871425)
Timeframe: Immediately postoperatively

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ketamine23
Fentanyl30

[back to top]