Page last updated: 2024-12-09

eszopiclone

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

Eszopiclone: A pyridine, pyrazine, and piperazine derivative that is used as a HYPNOTIC AND SEDATIVE in the treatment of INSOMNIA. [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

eszopiclone : The (5S)- (active) enantiomer of zopiclone. Unlike almost all other hypnotic sedatives, which are approved only for the relief of short-term (6-8 weeks) insomnia, eszopiclone is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for long-term use. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID969472
CHEMBL ID1522
CHEBI ID53760
SCHEMBL ID28657
MeSH IDM0463158

Synonyms (97)

Synonym
AC-5546
sep-225441
(+)-zopiclone
lunesta
sep-0227018
estorra
eszopiclone
(s)-zopiclone
lunivia
sep-190
sep-0227108
eszopiclone (jan/usp/inn)
lunesta (tn)
D02624
estorra (tn)
138729-47-2
(s)-6-(5-chloro-2-pyridinyl)- 7-oxo- 6,7-dihydro- 5h-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyrazin-5-yl- 4-methyl- 1-piperazinecarboxylate
1-piperazinecarobxylic acid,4-methyl-,(5s)-6-(5-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-6,7-dihydro-7-oxo-5h-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyrazin-5-yl ester
esopiclone
(+)-(5s)-6-(5-chloropyridin-2-yl)-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5h-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyrazin-5-yl-4-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate
DB00402
(+)-(5s)-6-(5-chloropyridin-2-yl)-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5h-pyrrolo(3,4-b)pyrazin-5-yl 4-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate
NCGC00159515-02
SPECTRUM1505188
hsdb 7472
1-piperazinecarboxylic acid, 4-methyl-, (5s)-6-(5-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-6,7-dihydro-7-oxo-5h-pyrrolo(3,4-b)pyrazin-5-yl ester
(5s)-6-(5-chloropyridin-2-yl)-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5h-pyrrolo(3,4-b)pyrazin-5-yl 4-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate
eszopiclone [usan:inn]
MLS001165744
smr000550478
eszopiclone civ
eszopiclon
CHEMBL1522
zopiclone s-form
gsk-1755165
(5s)-6-(5-chloropyridin-2-yl)-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5h-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyrazin-5-yl 4-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate
CHEBI:53760 ,
A807426
[(7s)-6-(5-chloro-2-pyridyl)-5-oxo-7h-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyrazin-7-yl] 4-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate
[(7s)-6-(5-chloropyridin-2-yl)-5-oxo-7h-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyrazin-7-yl] 4-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate
HMS3259B17
HMS3264F04
(+)-(5s)-6(chloropyridine-2-yl)-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5h-pyrrolo(3,4-b)-pyrazin-5-yl-4-methyl-piperazine-1-carboxylate
cas-138729-47-2
dtxsid8046086 ,
dtxcid6026086
tox21_111733
(5s)-6-(5-chloropyrid-2-yl)-5-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)carbonyloxy-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5h-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyrazine
unii-uzx80k71oe
uzx80k71oe ,
(s)-eszopiclone
HMS2864O09
eszopiclone [usan]
eszopiclone [who-dd]
eszopiclone [orange book]
eszopiclone [hsdb]
eszopiclone [jan]
zopiclone s-form [mi]
eszopiclone [inn]
eszopiclone civ [usp-rs]
eszopiclone [usp monograph]
eszopiclone [vandf]
eszopiclone [mart.]
AKOS015895596
gtpl7429
CCG-213172
NC00663
SCHEMBL28657
tox21_111733_1
NCGC00159515-03
KS-1055 ,
GBBSUAFBMRNDJC-INIZCTEOSA-N
(s)-6-(5-chloropyridin-2-yl)-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5h-pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyrazin-5-yl 4-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate
AB00828423_06
AC-5547
SR-05000001914-2
sr-05000001914
SR-05000001914-1
(s)-(+)-zopiclone
bdbm50247998
BCP04910
zopiclon
Q413184
1140433-81-3
eszopiclone, (+)-zopiclone, (s)-zopiclone, estorra (r)-isomer
(6-(5-chloro-2-pyridyl)-6,7-dihydro-7-oxo-5h-pyrrolo(3,4-b)pyrazin-5-yl) -4-methyl-1-piperazine carboxylate
1-piperazinecarobxylic acid,4-methyl-,(5s)-6-(5-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-6,7-dihydro-7-oxo-5h-pyrrolo(3,4-b)pyrazin-5-yl ester
eszopiclona
(+)-(5s)-6-(5-chloropyridin-2-yl)-7-oxo-6,7-dihydro-5h-pyrrolo(3,4-b)pyrazin-5-yl-4-methylpiperazine-1-carboxylate
(s)-6-(5-chloro-2-pyridinyl)- 7-oxo- 6,7-dihydro- 5h-pyrrolo(3,4-b)pyrazin-5-yl- 4-methyl- 1-piperazinecarboxylate
eszopiclone civ (usp-rs)
eszopiclone (usp monograph)
n05cf04
()-zopiclone
1-piperazinecarboxylic acid, 4-methyl-, (5s)-6-(5-chloro-2-pyridinyl)- 6,7-dihydro-7-oxo-5h-pyrrolo(3,4-b)pyrazin-5-yl ester
eszopiclonum
eszopiclone (mart.)

Research Excerpts

Overview

Ezopiclone is a hypnotic drug belonging to a newer group of hypnotic agents, known as new generation hypnotics. It was marketed as being just as effective as benzodiazepines while being safer and having a lower risk for abuse and dependence.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Eszopiclone is a hypnotic drug belonging to a newer group of hypnotic agents, known as new generation hypnotics, which was marketed as being just as effective as benzodiazepines for this condition, while being safer and having a lower risk for abuse and dependence."( Eszopiclone for insomnia.
Englbrecht, C; Hajak, G; Rösner, S; Soyka, M; Wehrle, R, 2018
)
2.64
"Eszopiclone appears to be an efficient drug with moderate effects on sleep onset and maintenance. "( Eszopiclone for insomnia.
Englbrecht, C; Hajak, G; Rösner, S; Soyka, M; Wehrle, R, 2018
)
3.37
"Eszopiclone is a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic for the treatment of insomnia and classified as schedule IV controlled substance. "( Eszopiclone ingestions reported to Texas poison control centers, 2005 2006.
Forrester, MB, 2007
)
3.23

Effects

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Eszopiclone has been shown to be an efficacious and cost-effective option for the treatment of transient and chronic insomnia in adults."( The role of eszopiclone in the treatment of insomnia.
Morin, AK; Willett, K, 2009
)
2.17

Actions

Ezopiclone is known to enhance the deficient sleep spindles that are related to impairments in learning and memory in schizophrenia. EszopicLone did not increase TST significantly but was superior to placebo in improving quality of sleep and some measures of sleep maintenance.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Eszopiclone is known to enhance the deficient sleep spindles that are related to impairments in learning and memory in schizophrenia."( Eszopiclone for persistent negative symptoms in schizophrenia - An unintended N-of-1 study.
Mehta, UM; Ravishankar, V; Thirthalli, J, 2018
)
2.64
"Eszopiclone did not increase TST significantly but was superior to placebo in improving quality of sleep and some measures of sleep maintenance, which is the most common sleep difficulty experienced by patients with PD."( Treatment of insomnia in Parkinson's disease: a controlled trial of eszopiclone and placebo.
Bienfait, K; Cantor, C; Comella, CL; Dicke, A; Dobkin, RD; Gara, M; Hyer, L; Marin, H; Menza, M, 2010
)
1.32

Treatment

Pretreatment with eszopiclone improves the quality of polysomnography and CPAP titration. Pretreatment did not affect stress-induced stimulation of the HPA axis.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Eszopiclone treats insomnia and cooccurring menopause-related symptoms. "( Eszopiclone improves insomnia and depressive and anxious symptoms in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with hot flashes: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial.
Cohen, LS; Farrell, A; Joffe, H; Koukopoulos, A; Petrillo, L; Silver, M; Silver-Heilman, K; Viguera, A; Yu, G, 2010
)
3.25
"Pretreatment with eszopiclone improves the quality of polysomnography and CPAP titration and decreases the need to repeat studies. "( Eszopiclone improves overnight polysomnography and continuous positive airway pressure titration: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Andrada, T; Eliasson, AH; Lettieri, CJ; Quast, TN, 2008
)
2.12
"Pretreatment with eszopiclone did not affect stress-induced stimulation of the HPA axis."( Eszopiclone stimulates the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in the rat.
Bholat, Y; Lacayo, LM; Manalo, CM; Pechnick, RN; Spivak, I, 2011
)
2.14

Toxicity

The safety and tolerability of eszopiclone was evaluated by adverse events recording, physical examination, laboratory testing, vital signs, and 12-lead ECG findings. Clonidine, melatonin, L-theanine, eszopylone and guanfacine were well tolerated with mild to moderate adverse events. Zolpidem was associated with neuropsychiatric adverse effects.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The incidence of central nervous system adverse events was 23."( A polysomnographic placebo-controlled evaluation of the efficacy and safety of eszopiclone relative to placebo and zolpidem in the treatment of primary insomnia.
Amato, D; Caron, J; Erman, MK; Rubens, R; Schaefer, K; Walsh, JK; Wessel, T; Zammit, G, 2008
)
0.57
" Other agents commonly used at sea-level such as eszopiclone and diphenhydramine have not been studied at high altitude but are likely safe to use given their mechanism of action and known side effects."( Which medications are safe and effective for improving sleep at high altitude?
Luks, AM, 2008
)
0.6
"Most NBZHs can be effective and safe agents for selected BD outpatients with episodic or chronic insomnia."( Efficacy and safety of nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics for chronic insomnia in patients with bipolar disorder.
Hang, E; Miller, AR; Nordahl, TE; Schaffer, CB; Schaffer, LC, 2011
)
0.37
" The safety and tolerability of eszopiclone was evaluated by adverse events recording, physical examination, laboratory testing, vital signs, and 12-lead ECG findings."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of eszopiclone in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Guo, SJ; Wang, SM; Wei, MJ; Wu, F; Zhang, P; Zhao, XL; Zhou, H, 2012
)
0.95
" Clonidine, melatonin, L-theanine, eszopiclone and guanfacine were well tolerated with mild to moderate adverse events; zolpidem was associated with neuropsychiatric adverse effects."( Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Drugs for Treating Behavioural Insomnia in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review with Methodological Quality Assessment.
Anand, S; Besag, FMC; Chan, EW; Cortese, S; Tong, H; Wong, ICK, 2017
)
0.73
"Considering study quality and the potential adverse effects of benzodiazepines and nonbenzodiazepines, low-dose doxepin seems to be the optimal pharmacotherapy for the improvements in total sleep time and sleep efficiency."( Comparative efficacy and safety of hypnotics for insomnia in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Chen, PY; Chiu, HY; Hua, SJ; Lee, HC; Liu, JW; Tsai, PS; Tu, YK, 2021
)
0.62

Pharmacokinetics

The longer half-life of eszopiclone compared to other commonly used hypnotics may translate into improved efficacy in enhancing sleep maintenance, or increased probability of residual sedative or performance-impairing effects.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The main objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic characters of eszopiclone (CAS: 138729-47-2) after single and multiple-dose oral administration in healthy adult Chinese volunteers."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of eszopiclone in healthy Chinese volunteers.
Guo, SJ; Wang, SM; Wei, MJ; Wu, F; Zhang, P; Zhao, XL; Zhou, H, 2012
)
0.89
"This paper addresses the pharmacokinetic properties of eszopiclone and the extent to which the longer half-life of eszopiclone compared to other commonly used hypnotics (immediate-release zolpidem, modified-release zolpidem, triazolam, zaleplon) may translate into either improved efficacy in enhancing sleep maintenance, or increased probability of residual sedative or performance-impairing effects."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of eszopiclone: clinical and therapeutic implications.
Greenblatt, DJ; Zammit, GK, 2012
)
0.91
" The mean half-life in healthy nonelderly individuals (6."( Pharmacokinetic evaluation of eszopiclone: clinical and therapeutic implications.
Greenblatt, DJ; Zammit, GK, 2012
)
0.67
"F4 had the highest Cmax (39."( Construction of sublingual trilaminated Eszopiclone fast dissolving film for the treatment of Insomnia: Formulation, characterization and In vivo clinical comparative pharmacokinetic study in healthy human subjects.
El-Nabarawi, M; Elfar, N; Helal, D; Shoueir, K; Teaima, M; Yasser, M, 2022
)
0.99

Compound-Compound Interactions

The efficacy of CBT-I combined with eszopiclone in the treatment of sleep disorders in ICU transferred out patients was better than eszopylone.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"To determine the efficacy of eszopiclone combined with escitalopram oxalate in treating insomnia comorbid with GAD."( Eszopiclone coadministered with escitalopram in patients with insomnia and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder.
Huang, H; Kinrys, G; Krishnan, R; Krystal, A; McCall, WV; Pollack, M; Roach, J; Roth, T; Rubens, R; Schaefer, K, 2008
)
2.08
"The efficacy of CBT-I combined with eszopiclone in the treatment of sleep disorders in ICU transferred out patients was better than eszopiclone."( Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia combined with eszopiclone for the treatment of sleep disorder patients transferred out of the intensive care unit: A single-centred retrospective observational study.
Hu, W; Liu, Y; Mao, J; Ren, W; Su, J; Tang, G; Wang, J; Yu, Z; Zhang, Y, 2018
)
1

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Human oral bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic property, which is directly related to the amount of drug available in the systemic circulation to exert pharmacological and therapeutic effects."( Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
Andricopulo, AD; Moda, TL; Montanari, CA, 2007
)
0.34
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51

Dosage Studied

linear dose-response relationships were observed for eszopiclone. Study participants received nighttime dosing of 3 mg eszopylone or placebo.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Study participants received nighttime dosing of 3 mg eszopiclone or placebo."( Next-day cognition, psychomotor function, and driving-related skills following nighttime administration of eszopiclone.
Boyle, J; Johnsen, S; Roach, J; Rubens, R; Trick, L, 2008
)
0.81
" Nighttime dosing of both eszopiclone (3 mg) and racemic zopiclone (7."( A method to assess the dissipation of the [corrected] residual effects of [corrected] hypnotics: eszopiclone versus zopiclone.
Atzori, G; Boyle, J; Cooper, JA; Dijk, DJ; Gandhi, P; Groeger, JA; Jones, S; Paska, W; Rockett, C; Scott, J, 2012
)
0.9
"To evaluate the efficacy and dose-response effect of eszopiclone on sleep latency and sleep maintenance in Japanese patients with primary insomnia."( A randomized placebo-controlled polysomnographic study of eszopiclone in Japanese patients with primary insomnia.
Chiba, S; Inoue, Y; Kamijo, A; Kuwahara, H; Shimizu, T; Uchimura, N; Uchiyama, M, 2012
)
0.87
"05 for all comparisons); linear dose-response relationships were observed for eszopiclone."( A randomized placebo-controlled polysomnographic study of eszopiclone in Japanese patients with primary insomnia.
Chiba, S; Inoue, Y; Kamijo, A; Kuwahara, H; Shimizu, T; Uchimura, N; Uchiyama, M, 2012
)
0.85
"A sensitive, stability-indicating reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method was developed for the determination of eszopiclone and related impurities in tablet dosage form."( Stability-indicating LC-UV method for the determination of eszopiclone and degradation impurities in tablet dosage form.
Gite, S; Patil, A; Shaikh, K, 2014
)
0.85
"Active-phase dosing of DORA-22 induced consistent effects on sleep architecture in mice, rats, dogs, and rhesus monkeys; attenuation of active wake was accompanied by increases in both non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep."( Differential sleep-promoting effects of dual orexin receptor antagonists and GABAA receptor modulators.
Coleman, PJ; Fox, SV; Garson, SL; Gotter, AL; Kuduk, SD; McDonald, T; Munden, RL; Renger, JJ; Stevens, J; Tannenbaum, PL; Tye, SJ; Uslaner, JM; Winrow, CJ; Yao, L, 2014
)
0.4
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (2)

RoleDescription
sedativeA central nervous system depressant used to induce drowsiness or sleep or to reduce psychological excitement or anxiety.
central nervous system depressantA loosely defined group of drugs that tend to reduce the activity of the central nervous system.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
zopicloneA pyrrolo[3,4-b]pyrazine compound having a 4-methylpiperazine-1-carboxyl group at the 5-position, a 5-chloropyridin-2-yl group at the 6-position and an oxo-substituent at the 7-position.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (16)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
USP1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency125.89200.031637.5844354.8130AID504865
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency20.93100.001310.157742.8575AID1259252
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency2.39140.000214.376460.0339AID720691
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency19.49710.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.05010.00000.21085.6234AID345418
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)Ki5.09200.00000.18819.0000AID345419; AID345423; AID345620
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)Ki15.00000.00010.24425.6234AID345422
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.16200.00010.25155.6234AID345620
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.11400.00010.24015.6234AID345419
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)Ki5.09200.00000.28325.6234AID345419; AID345423; AID345620
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.10200.00020.37095.6234AID345421
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)Ki15.00000.00020.41199.0000AID345423
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (58)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathwayGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, GABAergicGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapse assemblyGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathwayGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
post-embryonic developmentGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
adult behaviorGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, GABAergicGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to histamineGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapse assemblyGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
behavioral fear responseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathwayGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
associative learningGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
inner ear receptor cell developmentGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
innervationGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
cochlea developmentGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of presynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, GABAergicGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapse assemblyGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathwayGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapse assemblyGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, GABAergicGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathwayGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of presynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapse assemblyGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, GABAergicGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathwayGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
chemical synaptic transmissionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, GABAergicGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
inner ear receptor cell developmentGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
innervationGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to histamineGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
cochlea developmentGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapse assemblyGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathwayGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, GABAergicGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapse assemblyGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
signal transductionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling pathwayGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic transmission, GABAergicGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
chloride transmembrane transportGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapse assemblyGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (34)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
GABA receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
transmitter-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
benzodiazepine receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
transmitter-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
benzodiazepine receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
GABA receptor bindingGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of presynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
transmitter-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
benzodiazepine receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
benzodiazepine receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
benzodiazepine receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of presynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
transmitter-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
transmitter-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
neurotransmitter receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
transmitter-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
benzodiazepine receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
transmitter-gated monoatomic ion channel activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
benzodiazepine receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-gated chloride ion channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel activityGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (38)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicle membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-ergic synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic specialization membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
GABA receptor complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
axonGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicle membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-ergic synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic specialization membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell body membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
presynaptic membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-ergic synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic specialization membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
axonGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
synaptic vesicle membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
inhibitory synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-ergic synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic specialization membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicle membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-ergic synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic specialization membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-ergic synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic specialization membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellar Golgi cell to granule cell synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
postsynaptic specialization membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
GABA-A receptor complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
chloride channel complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
dendrite membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transporter complexGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
synapseGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
neuron projectionGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (107)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID311524Oral bioavailability in human2007Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-15, Volume: 15, Issue:24
Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
AID345463Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 A160C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID345451Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 A79C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345419Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-2-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345418Displacement of [3H]Ro15-1788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345468Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 S205C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345458Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 X161 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha1beta2gamma2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345427Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 T81C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345445Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha1 S205C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345435Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 R185C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345444Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha1 S204C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345426Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 A79C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345453Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 T126C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha1beta2gamma2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345450Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 M130C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345460Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 R194C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha1beta2gamma2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345456Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 T142C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha1beta2gamma2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345438Displacement of [3H]Ro15-1788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1 F99C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345461Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 F99C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345466Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 V202C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345442Displacement of [3H]Ro15-1788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1 G200C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345457Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 R144C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha1beta2gamma2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID1597741Half life in human at 1 to 3 mg2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 29, Issue:16
Sleep modulating agents.
AID345464Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 T162C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345434Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 X161 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345431Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 L140C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345446Displacement of [3H]Ro15-1788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1 T206C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345421Displacement of [3H]Ro-154513 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-4-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345433Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 R144C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345620Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-3-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345443Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha1 V202C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345448Displacement of [3H]Ro15-1788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1 V211C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345469Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 T206C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345465Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 G200C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345452Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 T81C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha1beta2gamma2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345436Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 R194C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345449Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 D56C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345439Displacement of [3H]Ro15-1788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1 G157C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345432Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 T142C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345422Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-5-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345423Displacement of [3H]Ro-154513 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-6-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345462Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 G157C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID345429Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 M130C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345467Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 S204C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID345470Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha1 V211C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345459Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 R185C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha1beta2gamma2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345424Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 D56C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345455Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 L140C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha1beta2gamma2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345428Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 T126C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345454Ratio of Ki for GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 R132C receptor mutant to Ki for GABAA alpha1beta2gamma2 receptor2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345430Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 R132C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID345447Displacement of [3H]Ro15-1788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha1 Y209C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID345425Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha-1-beta-2-gamma-2 F77C receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345437Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha1 D97C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345441Displacement of [3H]Ro15-1788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha1 T162C beta-2-gamma-2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID345440Displacement of [3H]Ro-151788 from benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA alpha1 A160C beta2gamma2 receptor mutant expressed in HEK293T cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-27, Volume: 51, Issue:22
Structural requirements for eszopiclone and zolpidem binding to the gamma-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABAA) receptor are different.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588497High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain F protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588499High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Botulinum neurotoxin light chain A protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Current protocols in cytometry, Oct, Volume: Chapter 13Microsphere-based flow cytometry protease assays for use in protease activity detection and high-throughput screening.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2006Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, May, Volume: 69, Issue:5
Microsphere-based protease assays and screening application for lethal factor and factor Xa.
AID588501High-throughput multiplex microsphere screening for inhibitors of toxin protease, specifically Lethal Factor Protease, MLPCN compound set2010Assay and drug development technologies, Feb, Volume: 8, Issue:1
High-throughput multiplex flow cytometry screening for botulinum neurotoxin type a light chain protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (149)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's34 (22.82)29.6817
2010's94 (63.09)24.3611
2020's21 (14.09)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 94.49

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index94.49 (24.57)
Research Supply Index5.26 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.71 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index169.17 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (94.49)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials37 (24.03%)5.53%
Reviews26 (16.88%)6.00%
Case Studies4 (2.60%)4.05%
Observational1 (0.65%)0.25%
Other86 (55.84%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (67)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Endotype-Targeted Therapy to Rescue OSA Patients Struggling With CPAP Adherence (TOP-CPAP): a Pilot Trial [NCT05951023]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-31Recruiting
Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of Eszopiclone in Insomnia Patients (Study LUN01S) [NCT02452684]4,876 participants (Actual)Observational2012-10-01Completed
A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of Eszopiclone for the Treatment of Bupropion- and Abstinence-Related Insomnia During Smoking Cessation [NCT00511134]Phase 44 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Study has been terminated due low recruitment of participant population.)
Auricular Acupuncture for Primary Insomnia [NCT02087488]288 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
An Open Label, Balanced, Randomized, Two-Treatment, Two Period, Two-Sequence, Single Dose, Crossover, Oral Bioequivalence Study Of Eszopiclone Tablets 3 mg of Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited, and 'LUNESTA' Tablets 3 mg, Mfg For Sepracor Inc. USA In Healt [NCT02322645]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Eszopiclone in the Treatment of Insomnia in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain [NCT00365976]Phase 458 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
An Open Label, Balanced, Randomized, Two-Treatment, Two Period, Two-Sequence, Single Dose, Crossover, Oral Bioequivalence Study of Eszopiclone Tablets 3 mg of Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited, and 'LUNESTA' Tablets 3 mg, Mfg For Sepracor Inc. USA In Healt [NCT02322658]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Phase III Study of SEP-190 (Eszopiclone) in Patients With Insomnia [NCT00770692]Phase 3369 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study of the Effects of Eszopiclone on Glucose Tolerance, Insulin Secretion, and Insulin Action in Adults With Chronic Insomnia [NCT00724282]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
The Safety and Efficacy of Eszopiclone in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome [NCT00685269]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-08-31Completed
Effects of Eszopiclone on Sleep-dependent Learning in Schizophrenia [NCT00833547]25 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Endotypic Traits and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgery [NCT05953610]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-01Not yet recruiting
Do Endotypes Predict Response and Sequelae in OSA Patients [NCT04875364]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-08-01Recruiting
A Phase III, Non-inferiority, Double-blind, Unicenter Clinical Trial With Two Treatment Arms - Test Group With Eszopiclone 3 mg Versus Zopiclone 7.5 mg - for the Treatment of Insomnia [NCT01100164]Phase 3263 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
The Effect of Marijuana and Prescription Medications in Mood, Performance and Sleep [NCT00893269]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Multicenter Study Examining the Efficacy and Safety of SEP-225441 in Subjects With Generalized Anxiety Disorder. [NCT00616655]Phase 2456 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Eszopiclone for Improving Sleep Continuity in MS Patients With Sleep Disturbances and Its Impact on Daytime Fatigue [NCT00594087]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Phase II/III Study of SEP-190 (Eszopiclone) in Patients With Primary Insomnia [NCT00770510]Phase 2/Phase 3192 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Fixed Dose Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Eszopiclone in Children (6 to 11 Years) and Adolescents (12 to 17 Years) With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Associated Insomnia [NCT00856973]Phase 3486 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Eszopiclone for the Treatment of PTSD [NCT01605253]Phase 481 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Completed
Eszopiclone Co-Administered With Escitalopram for Insomnia in Elderly Adults With Major Depressive Disorder [NCT00813735]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Effects of Daytime Eszopiclone Administration in Shift Workers on Overnight Wakefulness During a Subsequent Simulated Nightshift [NCT00900159]24 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Positron Emission Tomography Assessment of the Central Nervous System Effects of Eszopiclone and Zolpidem [NCT00781482]Phase 40 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Sponsor elected not to conduct study at this time.)
Hypnotics to Improve Polysomnography Yield: Eszopiclone vs Ramelteon? [NCT00811746]90 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Treating Residual OSA With Endotype-directed Pharmacotherapy (Aim 3) [NCT05293600]Phase 1/Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-01Not yet recruiting
Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind Trial of Eszopiclone for Insomnia Associated With Schizophrenia [NCT00645944]39 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
The Efficacy of Eszopiclone (Lunesta) for Chronic Insomnia Associated With Osteoarthritis. [NCT00374556]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
A Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study of Eszopiclone in Elderly Subjects With Primary Chronic Insomnia [NCT00386334]Phase 4388 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
Eszopiclone for Sleep Disturbance and Nightmares in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder [NCT00120250]Phase 427 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Sleep Effectiveness and Insulin and Glucose Homeostasis [NCT01887691]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Terminated
A Long Term, Open-Label, Safety Study of Eszopiclone in Children (6 to 11 Years) and Adolescents (12 to 17 Years) With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Associated Insomnia [NCT00857220]Phase 3304 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Eszoplicone on Initial Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Compliance [NCT00612157]Phase 4154 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Brain Mechanisms and Targeting Insomnia in Major Depression [NCT00628914]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-05-31Active, not recruiting
The Effects of Eszopiclone and Lexapro on Prefrontal Glutamate and GABA in Depression With Co-morbid Anxiety and Insomnia: A Proton MRS Study [NCT00826111]Phase 419 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A 31-Week, Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Study of Eszopiclone 3 mg Co-administered With Venlafaxine in Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Co-existing Insomnia [NCT00435279]Phase 3678 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Testing the Nocturnal Sleep Latency Profile in Primary Insomnia [NCT00167375]24 participants (Anticipated)Observational2005-01-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Eszopiclone (Lunesta) in Nursing Home Patients [NCT00460993]Phase 471 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Bioequivalence Study of Different Formulations of SEP-190 and Food Effect Study in Japanese Healthy Adult Males [NCT01055834]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial Assessing the Effects of Ezopiclone on the Quality of Overnight Polysomnography and CPAP Titration [NCT00507117]Phase 4300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Rescuing OSA Patients Unable to Tolerate CPAP Using Endotype-Targeted Combination Drug Therapy: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [NCT04639193]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-01Recruiting
The Effects of a Single Evening Dose of 3 mg Eszopiclone on Next Day Driving Ability and Psychomotor/Memory Function in Healthy Volunteers Compared to Placebo [NCT00368160]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Subchronic Effects of Eszopiclone (Lunesta) on Pain Behavior and Circuitry in Primary Insomnia [NCT00414037]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Funding terminated by sponsor, insufficient data collection)
A Six-Month, Chronic Efficacy and Safety Study of Eszopiclone in Adult Subjects With Primary Insomnia: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study [NCT00352144]Phase 3830 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
The Effects of Eszopiclone Treatment (3mg for Two Months) to Counteract the Adverse Metabolic Consequences of Primary Insomnia [NCT00555750]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Eszopiclone Treatment & Cortisol Response to HPA Axis Tests [NCT00889200]Phase 412 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Eszopiclone in the Treatment of Insomnia and Associated Symptoms of Fibromyalgia [NCT00392041]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Effect of Eszopiclone (Lunesta) on Sleep Disturbance and Pain in Cancer [NCT00365261]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Mindfulness Versus Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Insomnia: A Pilot Study [NCT00515177]Phase 2/Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
Bioavailability of Two Formulations of Eszopiclone 3.0 mg Coated Tablets With Regards to the Marketed Reference Product [NCT05349396]Phase 128 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-11Completed
The Efficacy of Eszopiclone 3 mg as Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Insomnia Related to Generalized Anxiety Disorder. [NCT00235508]Phase 4420 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
The Efficacy of Eszopiclone 3 mg Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Insomnia Secondary to Perimenopause or Menopause [NCT00366093]Phase 3410 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled and Open-Label Twelve Month Study of the Safety of (S)-Zopiclone in Adult Subjects With Insomnia [NCT01710631]Phase 3791 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-28Completed
The Effect of Eszopiclone 3 mg Compared to Placebo on Daytime Function in Subjects With Insomnia Related to Rheumatoid Arthritis [NCT00367965]Phase 3153 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Treatment of Insomnia in Migraineurs With Eszopiclone (Lunesta™) and Its Effect on Sleep Time, Headache Frequency, and Daytime Functioning: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Pilot Study [NCT00812214]Phase 4113 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Completed
Effects of a Single Evening Dose of 3 mg Eszopiclone on Next Day Driving Ability and Psychomotor/Memory Function in Patients With Primary Insomnia Compared to Placebo [NCT00368056]Phase 332 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Risks for Transition From Therapeutic Hypnotic Use to Abuse [NCT02456532]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Completed
A Double-Blind Randomized Physiological Study Examining the Effects of Eszopiclone on the Arousal Threshold and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity [NCT01102270]Early Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Eszopiclone and Inflammatory Mediators in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [NCT00822679]Phase 45 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
CSP #2016 - National Adaptive Trial for PTSD Related Insomnia [NCT03668041]Phase 31,224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-25Recruiting
Sleep-dependent Memory Processing in Schizophrenia [NCT01641900]59 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Depression Response to Eszopiclone in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder (DREAMDD): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, 8-Week, Safety & Efficacy Study of Eszopiclone 3 mg Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Insomnia Relate [NCT00368030]Phase 3545 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
The Treatment of Insomnia in Symptomatic Peri- and Postmenopausal Women [NCT00374192]67 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Investigation of the Safety and Efficacy of Long Term Administration of Eszopiclone in Insomnia Patients (Study LUN02T) [NCT02455271]438 participants (Actual)Observational2012-10-01Completed
Treatment of Insomnia in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Multi-site, Placebo-controlled Study of Eszopiclone [NCT00324896]Phase 330 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Effect of Eszopiclone on Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Severity of Insomnia in Patients With Comorbidity Between Insomnia and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (COMISA) [NCT06017921]Phase 460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-24Recruiting
Hypnotics in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders [NCT00247624]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
A Pragmatic Randomized Comparator Trial of Eszopiclone and Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia in CPAP Non Adherent Veterans With PTSD and Complex Insomnia [NCT03937713]Phase 452 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-01Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00120250 (5) [back to overview]Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
NCT00120250 (5) [back to overview]Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
NCT00120250 (5) [back to overview]Short PTSD Rating Interview (SPRINT)
NCT00120250 (5) [back to overview]Total Sleep Time
NCT00120250 (5) [back to overview]Sleep Latency
NCT00247624 (4) [back to overview]Daily Living and Role Functioning (DLRF) Basis-32 Subscale Ratings
NCT00247624 (4) [back to overview]Relation to Self/Others (RSO) Basis-32 Subscale Ratings
NCT00247624 (4) [back to overview]Quality of Life Ratings, as Measured by the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q)
NCT00247624 (4) [back to overview]Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
NCT00324896 (2) [back to overview]WASO
NCT00324896 (2) [back to overview]TST
NCT00365261 (3) [back to overview]Pain
NCT00365261 (3) [back to overview]Patient Self-report Data on Fatigue
NCT00365261 (3) [back to overview]Opiate Dosing From Patient Controlled Analgesia
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-24)
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Mean Sleep Onset Latency (SOL)
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Number of Awakenings
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Patient Global Impression of Pain Ratings
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Roland Morris Low Back Pain Inventory (RMLBPI)
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Sleep Quality Ratings
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Visual Analog Scale Pain Ratings (VAS)
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Wake Time After Sleep Onset
NCT00365976 (10) [back to overview]Mean Subjective Sleep Diary Derived Total Sleep Time (TST)
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Mean Level of Pain Experienced Throughout the Day
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Index Scores
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Heat Pain Threshold
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Heat Pain Tolerance (HPTOL)
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Mean Total Scores
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Joint Stiffness as Assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Joint Stiffness Subscale
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Number of Awakenings
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Pain as Assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Severity Subscale
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Pressure Pain Threshold
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Health Component Summary
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Health Component Summary
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Quality of Life as Assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Disability Subscale
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Sleep Efficiency (SE)
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Sleep Efficiency as Assessed by Actigraphy
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Sleep Latency (SL)
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Sleep Latency as Assessed by Actigraphy
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Sleep Quality (SQ)
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Temporal Summation (TS)
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Time in Bed
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Total Sleep Time (TST)
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]TST as Assessed by Actigraphy
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
NCT00374556 (23) [back to overview]WASO as Assessed by Actigraphy
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Number of Awakenings Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Number of Awakenings (Subject-reported) at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Mental Component Summary of the Short Form-36 Scale Scores
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Insomnia Severity Index Total Scores at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wake Time After Sleep Onset Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Time Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Nap Time Per Week Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Nap Time Per Week as a Percentage of Total Asleep Time as Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Sheehan Disability Scale Total Score.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Subject-reported Awakenings at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Naps Per Week Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Ratings of Subject-reported Quality of Sleep at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Total Sleep Time at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Stated as a Percentage of the Total Asleep Time at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Per Week at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Sleep Latency at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Sleep at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Physical Well-being at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Depth of Sleep at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline In Subject-Reported Counts of Number of Naps Per Week at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Ability to Function at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Values for Wake Time After Sleep Onset Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Total Sleep Time Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Total Nap Time Per Week Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Awakenings Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Daytime Alertness at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Total Nap Time Per Week as a Percentage of Total Asleep Time Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-reported Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-reported Total Sleep Time in Minutes at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Per Week Stated as a Percentage of the Total Asleep Time at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-Reported Total Nap Time at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-reported Sleep Latency Reported at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-reported Physical Well-Being at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-Reported Number of Naps Each Week at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-reported Depth of Sleep at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-reported Daytime Alertness at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-reported Ability to Function at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Subject-reported Ability to Concentrate at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Sleep Latency Values Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Sheehan Disability Total Scores
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Physical Component Summary of the Short Form-36 Scale Scores.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Number of Naps Per Week Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Insomnia Severity Index Total Score Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Awakenings Using Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Naps Per Week Measured Using Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Measured Using Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Ability to Concentrate Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Ability to Function Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Counts of Number of Naps Per Week Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Depth of Sleep for the Average Reported During the Double-blind Period.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Number of Awakenings Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Physical Well-Being Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Sleep Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Sleep Latency (SL) Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Period.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Per Week as a Percent of Total Asleep Time Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Total Sleep Time (TST) Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) Averaged Over the 12 Week Double-blind Study Period.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Nap Time Per Week as a Percentage of Total Asleep Time Measured by Actigraphy and Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period.
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Time Measured by Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) Measured by Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline Total Nap Time Per Week Measured by Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change in Subject-reported Daytime Alertness Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change in Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Per Week Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Insomnia Severity Index Total Score at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary of the Short Form-36 Scale Scores
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary of the Short Form-36 Scale
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points
NCT00386334 (69) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Ability to Concentrate at Various Study Time Points.
NCT00392041 (1) [back to overview]Change in Total Sleep Time (TST) as Recorded in Patient Diaries
NCT00460993 (1) [back to overview]Sleep Efficiency
NCT00511134 (2) [back to overview]Level of Insomnia as Measured by the Insomnia Severity Index
NCT00511134 (2) [back to overview]Smoking Abstinence as Measured by Self Reported Smoking and Confirmed by CO Level
NCT00515177 (6) [back to overview]State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
NCT00515177 (6) [back to overview]Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
NCT00515177 (6) [back to overview]Medical Outcome Study Short Form (SF-12)
NCT00515177 (6) [back to overview]Insomnia Severity Index
NCT00515177 (6) [back to overview]Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
NCT00515177 (6) [back to overview]Actigraphy
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Post-treatment Leptin Levels
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Post-treatment Ghrelin Levels
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Change in Total Sleep Time Measured by PSG
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Change in Total Sleep Time as Reported in Sleep Diaries
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Change in Subjective Sleepiness as Measured on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Change in Mean Lapses of Attention
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Change in Insulin Sensitivity (SI)
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Change in HbA1c Levels
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Change in Glucose Tolerance (Kg) in Response to Insulin-modified Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Change in Glucose Effectiveness (SG)
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Pre-Treatment Leptin Levels
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Pre-treatment Ghrelin Levels
NCT00555750 (13) [back to overview]Acute Insulin Response to Glucose (AIRg)
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) 50% Anxiolytic Response
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I)
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Remission
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Change in Individual Item Scores on HAM-A
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained Rater
NCT00616655 (11) [back to overview]Change From Baseline Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
NCT00645944 (1) [back to overview]Change in Insomnia Severity Index From Baseline.
NCT00770510 (6) [back to overview]Sleep Latency (SL)
NCT00770510 (6) [back to overview]Sleep Efficiency
NCT00770510 (6) [back to overview]Latency To Persistent Sleep (LPS)
NCT00770510 (6) [back to overview]Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)- Objective & Subjective
NCT00770510 (6) [back to overview]Total Sleep Time (Objective & Subjective)
NCT00770510 (6) [back to overview]Number of Awakenings (Objective & Subjective)
NCT00770692 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT00770692 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)
NCT00770692 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Time
NCT00770692 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Number of Awakenings
NCT00770692 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline In Sleep Latency
NCT00812214 (8) [back to overview]Nighttime Awakenings
NCT00812214 (8) [back to overview]Daytime Fatigue
NCT00812214 (8) [back to overview]Nighttime Awakenings
NCT00812214 (8) [back to overview]Headache Duration
NCT00812214 (8) [back to overview]Headache Intensity
NCT00812214 (8) [back to overview]Quality of Sleep
NCT00812214 (8) [back to overview]Total Sleep Time
NCT00812214 (8) [back to overview]Headache Frequency
NCT00826111 (9) [back to overview]Change in Thalamic Glutamine From Baseline to Week 1
NCT00826111 (9) [back to overview]Change in Thalamic Glutamate From Baseline to Week 1
NCT00826111 (9) [back to overview]Change in Anterior Cingulate Cortex GABA From Baseline to Week 1
NCT00826111 (9) [back to overview]Change in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Glutamate From Baseline to Week 1
NCT00826111 (9) [back to overview]Change in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Glutamine From Baseline to Week 1.
NCT00826111 (9) [back to overview]Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Score From Baseline to Week 10
NCT00826111 (9) [back to overview]Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Score From Baseline to Week 10
NCT00826111 (9) [back to overview]Change in Insomnia Severity Index Score From Baseline to Week 10
NCT00826111 (9) [back to overview]Change in Thalamic GABA From Baseline to Week 1
NCT00833547 (2) [back to overview]Sleep Spindle Density During Stage 2 Sleep as Measured by Polysomnography
NCT00833547 (2) [back to overview]Overnight Change on Finger Tapping Task
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Subjective SL (Sleep Latency)
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Subjective Number of Awakenings After Sleep Onset (NAASO).
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in PSG Defined Total Sleep Time (TST)
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in PSG Defined Sleep Efficiency (SE)
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in PSG Defined Number of Awakenings After Sleep Onset (NAASO).
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Total Score.
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Coding Copy Subtest / Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) Scaled Score.
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 11 in Total Sleep Time (TST) Measured by Actigraphy Monitoring in the Actigraphy Population.
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 11 in Subjective WASO From Actigraphy Population.
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 11 in Subjective Sleep Latency (SL) Measured by Actigraphy Monitoring in the Actigraphy Population.
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to the End of the Double- Blind Treatment Period (Week 12) in Polysomnography (PSG) Defined Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS).
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Improvement (CGI)-Parent/Caregiver at Week 12
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in CGI-Child at Week 12
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12 in PSG Defined Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12 in Conners' ADHD Inattention Rating Scale.
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pediatric Quality-of-Life Scale (Short Form-10).
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change in School Tardiness/Attendance Reports at Week 12 (Days)
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change in School Tardiness/Attendance Reports at Week 12 (Hours)
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Subjective Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO).
NCT00856973 (20) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Subjective Total Sleep Time (TST).
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Overall Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement Score as Assessed by Parent/Caregiver or Child at Month 12
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Scale
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Overall Incidence of Skin Reactions: Number of Participant Affected
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Overall Incidence of Skin Reactions: Number of Events
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS)at Month 12
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Coding Copy Subtest A or B, or Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)at Month 12
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Total Sleep Time (TST).
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Sleep Latency (SL)
NCT00857220 (14) [back to overview]Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Number of Awakening After Sleep Onset (NAASO)
NCT00889200 (1) [back to overview]Cortisol Response to the Dex/CRH Test Post-treatment (6 Weeks Oral Drug)
NCT00900159 (5) [back to overview]Subjective Sleepiness and Performance
NCT00900159 (5) [back to overview]Objective Vigilance Task Performance
NCT00900159 (5) [back to overview]Sleep-dependent Memory Consolidation
NCT00900159 (5) [back to overview]EEG-recorded Sleep Efficiency
NCT00900159 (5) [back to overview]Nighttime Wakefulness Assessed by Mean Sleep Latency Across 4 Maintenance of Wakefulness Tests
NCT01055834 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter (Bioequivalence): Area Under the Plasma Concentration- Time Curve From Time 0 to Time 24 Hours (AUC[0-24])
NCT01055834 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter (Food Effect): Area Under the Plasma Concentration- Time Curve From Time 0 to Time 24 Hours (AUC[0-24])
NCT01055834 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter (Bioequivalence): Maximal Drug Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01055834 (4) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetic Parameter (Food Effect): Maximal Drug Concentration (Cmax)
NCT01102270 (4) [back to overview]Apnea Hypopnea Index
NCT01102270 (4) [back to overview]Arousal Threshold
NCT01102270 (4) [back to overview]Nadir Overnight Oxygen Saturation
NCT01102270 (4) [back to overview]Sleep Duration
NCT01605253 (5) [back to overview]Changes in Emotional Bias Memory Encoding Between Baseline and Week 12
NCT01605253 (5) [back to overview]Cytokine Inflammatory Marker on Interleukin-2
NCT01605253 (5) [back to overview]Total Score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Addendum (PSQI)
NCT01605253 (5) [back to overview]Cytokine Inflammatory Markers
NCT01605253 (5) [back to overview]Change in Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Between Baseline and Week 12
NCT01641900 (2) [back to overview]Motor Procedural Memory Performance
NCT01641900 (2) [back to overview]Sleep Spindle Density

Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)

"The CAPS is a highly detailed measure of the presence and severity of the DSM-IV PTSD criteria. The severity score was calculated by adding up the frequency score (scale 0 = none of the time to 4 = most or all of the time) and an intensity score (scale 0 = none to 4 = extreme), which can then be summed for all 17 symptom questions and/or for the three symptom clusters. Scores range from 0 to 136, where greater than or equal to 80 represents extreme PTSD symptomatology. In this case, the total score for all 17 symptom questions, which is also the sum of the three symptom clusters, is used." (NCT00120250)
Timeframe: Week 3

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone53.92
Placebo67.5

[back to top]

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

The PSQI is a 24-item, patient-administered scale that assess changes in sleep symptomatology. The total PSQI score ranges from 0 to 21 where a higher value indicates a worse sleep symptomatology. (NCT00120250)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone8.30
Placebo11.29

[back to top]

Short PTSD Rating Interview (SPRINT)

The SPRINT is a 8-item, clinician-administered scale assessing core and related symptoms of PTSD. Symptoms are rates on 5 point scales from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) where a higher value indicates a worse outcome. (NCT00120250)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone16.13
Placebo19.88

[back to top]

Total Sleep Time

Total Sleep Time was derived from a subject-completed daily sleep diary. (NCT00120250)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Eszopiclone390
Placebo362.38

[back to top]

Sleep Latency

Sleep Latency was derived from a subject-completed daily sleep diary. (NCT00120250)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Eszopiclone25.83
Placebo55.83

[back to top]

Daily Living and Role Functioning (DLRF) Basis-32 Subscale Ratings

"The BASIS 32 psychometric includes several subscales, including daily living and role functioning (DLRF). These subscales are rated from 0-4, with higher scores indicating a greater deal of difficulty in this dimension and lower scores denoting better outcomes. Measured weekly for 9 weeks. Reported as mean of 9 weeks." (NCT00247624)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoxetine (FLX) Plus Eszopiclone (ESZ)0.81
FLX Plus Placebo1.2

[back to top]

Relation to Self/Others (RSO) Basis-32 Subscale Ratings

"The BASIS 32 psychometric includes several subscales, including relation to self and others (RSO). These subscales are rated from 0-4, with higher scores indicating a greater deal of difficulty in this dimension. Measured weekly for 9 weeks. Reported as mean of 9 weeks." (NCT00247624)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoxetine (FLX) Plus Eszopiclone (ESZ)0.74
FLX Plus Placebo1.04

[back to top]

Quality of Life Ratings, as Measured by the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q)

The Q-LES-Q is scored from 0-100, with higher scores better than lower. Measured weekly for 9 weeks. Reported as mean of 9 weeks. (NCT00247624)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoxetine (FLX) Plus Eszopiclone (ESZ)50.2
FLX Plus Placebo46.9

[back to top]

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

The Insomnia Severity Index has seven questions. The seven answers are added up to get a total score, range 0-28. Lower scores represent better outcomes. Total score categories: 0-7 = No clinically significant insomnia, 8-14 = Subthreshold insomnia, 15-21 = Clinical insomnia (moderate severity), 22-28 = Clinical insomnia (severe). (NCT00247624)
Timeframe: 9 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluoxetine (FLX) Plus Eszopiclone (ESZ)21.1
FLX Plus Placebo20.2

[back to top]

WASO

Wake after sleep onset in minutes (NCT00324896)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Eszopiclone17
Placebo46

[back to top]

TST

Total sleep time in hours (NCT00324896)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionhours (Mean)
Eszopiclone5.7
Placebo6.0

[back to top]

Pain

"Pain was assessed with a 10-cm visual analog scale (0 = no pain at all; 10 = severe, uncontrolled pain)." (NCT00365261)
Timeframe: post dosing

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone3.72
Placebo5.41

[back to top]

Patient Self-report Data on Fatigue

Patients completed the five-item Profile of Mood States Scale, Short Form (POMS-SF) Fatigue-Inertia Scale to rate their fatigue complaints (scores range from 0 to 28; higher scores denote more fatigue). (NCT00365261)
Timeframe: 2 days post treatment

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone2.41
Placebo2.77

[back to top]

Opiate Dosing From Patient Controlled Analgesia

Morphine or dilaudid dose delivered at fixed rate with optional self-administered prn boluses. Dilaudid doses were converted into morphine equivalents by multiplying the dose by 5. (NCT00365261)
Timeframe: 2 days post dosing

Interventionmg (Median)
Eszopiclone36.35
Placebo40.94

[back to top]

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-24)

The Hamilton Depression Scale - 24 Items (HAM-D-24) measures depression severity. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptoms not present) to a maximum of 2 to 4 (symptom extremely severe) for a total score range of 0 to 76. The higher the score, the more severe. (NCT00365976)
Timeframe: prenaprosyn baseline, postnaprosyn Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
prenaprosyn Baselinepostnaprosyn BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone6.456.384.544.142.62
Placebo7.106.575.535.076.21

[back to top]

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

The ISI is a seven-item self-report questionnaire that provides a global measure of insomnia severity based on difficulty falling or staying asleep, satisfaction with sleep, or degree of impairment with daytime functioning. The total score ranges from 0-28: 0-7 (no clinical insomnia), 8-14 (subthreshold insomnia), 15-21 (insomnia of moderate severity), and 22-28 (severe insomnia). (NCT00365976)
Timeframe: Prenaprosyn Baseline, Postnaprosyn Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Prenaprosyn BaselinePostnaprosyn baselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone18.8518.0011.2810.618.38
Placebo20.2616.7812.8512.7413.75

[back to top]

Mean Sleep Onset Latency (SOL)

(NCT00365976)
Timeframe: Postnaprosyn Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 week 4

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Postnaprosyn BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone38.2822.3617.5015.28
Placebo34.1127.0023.1019.91

[back to top]

Number of Awakenings

(NCT00365976)
Timeframe: Postnaprosyn Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 week 4

,
Interventionawakenings (Mean)
Postnaprosyn BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone2.291.311.351.33
Placebo2.081.982.132.34

[back to top]

Patient Global Impression of Pain Ratings

Pain ratings included a global impression of pain rating (PGI) (1-5 rating with 1 being little pain and 5 is worst pain) (NCT00365976)
Timeframe: postnaprosyn Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
postnaprosyn BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone4.023.543.303.08
Placebo3.903.824.013.80

[back to top]

Roland Morris Low Back Pain Inventory (RMLBPI)

"The Roland-Morris Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (RMLBPDQ) is a 24-item instrument that assesses the extent to which activities of daily living are affected by LBP. It is composed of 24 yes-no items assessing potential disabilities.~Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability)." (NCT00365976)
Timeframe: prenaprosyn baseline, postnaprosyn Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
prenaprosyn Baselinepostnaprosyn BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone12.279.979.107.636.59
Placebo11.3310.309.059.327.94

[back to top]

Sleep Quality Ratings

Sleep quality ratings are based on a 1-10 Likert scale. Low scores represent poorer sleep quality and higher scores represent better quality sleep (NCT00365976)
Timeframe: Postnaprosyn Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Postnaprosyn BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone4.525.996.186.38
Placebo4.444.905.335.29

[back to top]

Visual Analog Scale Pain Ratings (VAS)

Scores are measured on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain (NCT00365976)
Timeframe: Postnaprosyn baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Postnaprosyn BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone48.5140.7234.7031.69
Placebo53.7951.9951.2551.60

[back to top]

Wake Time After Sleep Onset

(NCT00365976)
Timeframe: Postnaprosyn Baseline, Week 1, Week 2 week 4

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Postnaprosyn BaselineWeek 1Week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone91.5149.3437.0736.74
Placebo81.4376.7181.3276.18

[back to top]

Mean Subjective Sleep Diary Derived Total Sleep Time (TST)

Nightly total sleep time was averaged from diary entries. (NCT00365976)
Timeframe: Postnaprosyn baseline, Week 1, week 2, week 4

,
InterventionMinutes (Mean)
postnaprosyn baselineweek 1week 2Week 4
Eszopiclone316.96403.47421.97411.97
Placebo380.45375.56382.11388.96

[back to top]

Mean Level of Pain Experienced Throughout the Day

Assessed using a Daily Pain Diary with a scale 0-100, 0 being no pain, 100 being the most severe/intense (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone52.4044.4342.88
Placebo48.7942.2138.12

[back to top]

Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Index Scores

"PPTh:a somedic algometer's 1cm2 rubber probe was placed over muscle belly, with pressure increasing steadily at constant rate (30kPA/Sec), until subject indicated that s/he first felt pain. PPTh ratings were obtained on right brachioradialis & right trapezius in a random order (average was taken from both areas at each time point). During each cold pressor task, participants immersed contralateral hand (left) up to wrist, in a circulating cold water bath maintained at 4°C. 20 seconds after commencing hand immersion, PPTh was re-assessed on either right brachioradialis or right trapezius (the same site as baseline assessment). After PPTh assessment, participants removed hands from water. DNIC was measured as the % change in PPTh during cold pressor, relative to baseline PPTh [i.e., (mean PPTh during cold pressor / mean PPTh prior to cold pressor)*100]. Increase in PPTh during cold pressor (i.e., percentage scores above 100) reflects normal functioning of pain-inhibitory processes." (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionpercentage change of PPTh (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone1.191.231.14
Placebo1.231.261.16

[back to top]

Heat Pain Threshold

"Contact heat stimuli at non tissue damaging temperatures were delivered using computer driven, peltier-element-based stimulator (Medoc, TSA II), with a 9 cm2 probe applied to the left forearm. The thermode was affixed snugly via Velcro straps to ensure even skin contact and repositioned to an adjacent site after each trial to minimize sensitizationHPTh was assessed on the left ventral forearm using an ascending method of limits paradigm; from a non-painful 32°C baseline, the temperature was steadily increased at 0.5°C/sec. Two trials of heat pain threshold were conducted. Averages of both trials are presented from respective time point below. Subjects push a button when the stimulus first feels painful The temperature (degrees Celsius) at the time button is pushed is automatically recorded." (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventiondegrees Celsius (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone42.7742.1942.49
Placebo43.3843.4143.31

[back to top]

Heat Pain Tolerance (HPTOL)

"Contact heat stimuli at non tissue damaging temperatures were delivered using computer driven, peltier-element-based stimulator (Medoc, TSA II), with a 9 cm2 probe applied to the left forearm. The thermode was affixed snugly via Velcro straps to ensure even skin contact and repositioned to an adjacent site after each trial to minimize sensitization. HPTOL was assessed on the left ventral forearm using an ascending method of limits paradigm; from a non-painful 32°C baseline, the temperature was steadily increased at 0.5°C/sec. Two trials of HPTOL were conducted. An average of both trials at each respective time point is presented below. Subjects push a button when the stimulus becomes intolerable. The temperature (degrees Celsius) at the time button is pushed to terminate the stimulation is automatically recorded." (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventiondegrees Celsius (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone46.5646.8746.67
Placebo47.6547.5447.92

[back to top]

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Mean Total Scores

The ISI is made up of 7 questions, each possible of earning a score of 0-4, making the total range 0-28, where 0 indicates no severity/no problem with sleep and therefore no insomnia, or 28, being very severe with the highest level of insomnia (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone16.6410.7113
Placebo15.6412.5710.25

[back to top]

Joint Stiffness as Assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Joint Stiffness Subscale

The WOMAC is a quality of scale life made up of three domains, pain, stiffness, and disability which each comprising of 5, 2, and 7 questions, respectively. A VAS was used for each subscale. Joint Stiffness was assessed on a VAS scale of 0-20, with 0 being no joint stiffness, and 20 being maximum stiffness. (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone12.8612.1711.32
Placebo10.177.556.86

[back to top]

Number of Awakenings

As recorded in daily sleep diary (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionnumber of awakenings (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone3.703.113.42
Placebo3.533.062.38

[back to top]

Pain as Assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Severity Subscale

The WOMAC is a quality of scale life made up of three domains, pain, stiffness, and disability which each comprising of 5, 2, and 7 questions, respectively. A VAS was used for each subscale. Pain was assessed on a scale of 0-100, with 0 being absolutely no pain and 100 being maximum pain. (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone24.8824.4119.89
Placebo21.6219.1814.85

[back to top]

Pressure Pain Threshold

"A Somedic algometer was used to assess pressure pain threshold (PPTh) similar to previous studies. The algometer's 1cm2 rubber probe was placed over the muscle belly, with the pressure increased steadily at a constant rate (30kPA/Sec), until the subject indicated that s/he first felt pain. PPTh was assessed 2 times each, bilaterally, at (in a randomized order) the masseter muscle trapezius muscle, and at the proximal third of the brachioradialis muscle (forearm). The scores from each location were averaged for each participant at that respective time point. The same site was never stimulated consecutively. At least 90 s were maintained between successive stimuli" (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
InterventionkPA (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone267.93287.29309.15
Placebo300.91322.24381.92

[back to top]

Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Health Component Summary

The SF-36 is a broad, well normed measure of quality of life, comprised of 36 questions aggregated into 8 domains/dimensions. The Mental Component Summary was used here as a global index of mental health functioning. Scale 0-100, with 0 being worst functional level, 100 being the best. (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone45.7845.8647.04
Placebo50.4051.6850.71

[back to top]

Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Health Component Summary

The SF-36 is a broad, well normed measure of quality of life, comprised of 36 questions aggregated into 8 domains/dimensions. The Physical Component Summary was used here as a global index of physical health functioning. Scale 0-100, with 0 being worst functional level, 100 being the best. (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone52.7349.4449.40
Placebo57.6160.6065.00

[back to top]

Quality of Life as Assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Disability Subscale

The WOMAC is a quality of scale life made up of three domains, pain, stiffness, and disability which each comprising of 5, 2, and 7 questions, respectively. A VAS was used for each subscale. Disability was assessed on a VAS of 0-100, with 0 being absolutely no disability and 100 being maximum disability. (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone74.6979.7170.44
Placebo64.3262.2656.13

[back to top]

Sleep Efficiency (SE)

[(TST/ TIB)X 100], (%) as recorded in daily sleep diary (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionpercentage of efficient sleep (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone62.4477.4875.06
Placebo55.5466.3180.07

[back to top]

Sleep Efficiency as Assessed by Actigraphy

Subjects wore a Mini Mitter Actiwatch for two continuous weeks at each assessment periods to provide an objective index compared to the assessments made by daily sleep journal. Device is lightweight and worn on non-dominant wrist and contains and omni-directional accelerometer. The accelerometer records the occurrence and degree of motion with a minimal resultant force of .01g. Data are stored as activity counts within a specified epoch. Sleep efficiency is the index of sleep percentage recorded, equal to total sleep time divided by the time in bed X 100 = X%. (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionpercentage of time asleep (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone76.8379.9475.16
Placebo73.3274.7773.95

[back to top]

Sleep Latency (SL)

Sleep Latency: time taken to fall asleep, in minutes (as recorded in daily sleep diary) (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone47.5033.3341.42
Placebo58.3345.0031.38

[back to top]

Sleep Latency as Assessed by Actigraphy

Subjects wore a Mini Mitter Actiwatch for two continuous weeks at each assessment periods to provide an objective index compared to the assessments made by daily sleep journal. Device is lightweight and worn on non-dominant wrist and contains and omni-directional accelerometer. The accelerometer records the occurrence and degree of motion with a minimal resultant force of .01g. Data are stored as activity counts within a specified epoch. Sleep latency is the time taken to fall asleep, or equal to lights out- sleep onset (sleep onset: time when sleep is first scored after lights out, first scorable epoch). (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone26.7924.8738.89
Placebo46.2539.3124.71

[back to top]

Sleep Quality (SQ)

As recorded in daily sleep diary. Visual analog scales (VAS) Sleep Quality Ratings 0-100, 0= extremely poor sleep quality, (shallow and unrefreshing) and 100=excellent sleep quality (deep and refreshing) (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone37.9055.3355.71
Placebo44.4052.4659.16

[back to top]

Temporal Summation (TS)

TS :maximum windup pain rating - first windup pain rating (0-100). Contact heat stimuli at non tissue damaging temperatures were delivered using computer driven, peltier-element-based stimulator (Medoc, TSA II), with a 9 cm2 probe applied to left forearm. In order to assess temporal summation, three sequences of 10 heat pulses each (with stimulus temperatures of 46 degrees C, 48 degrees C, and 50 degrees C, in random order) were applied to left dorsal forearm. The thermode remains in fixed position during administration of 10 heat pulses that constitute a sequence. Within each sequence, successive thermal pulses at a given temperature are delivered for a duration of approximately 0.5 sec each, with a 2.5-sec inter-pulse interval. The rate of rise & fall of the thermode temp. is set at the device max .of 10 degrees C / S. Subjects verbally rate the perceived intensity of each thermal pulse on a 0-100 rating scale & may terminate the procedure at any time.100=max tolerable intensity (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up and 12 week follow-up at 46, 48, and 50 degrees C

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline 46 degrees C6 week follow-up 46 degrees C12 week follow-up 46 degrees CBaseline 48 degrees C6 week follow-up 48 degrees C12 week follow-up 48 degrees CBaseline 50 degrees C6 week follow-up 50 degrees C12 week follow-up 50 degrees C
Eszopiclone7.806.503.334.728.114.5521.0018.0020.77
Placebo9.206.415.2220.405.755.2317.0613.2718.84

[back to top]

Time in Bed

Total time in bed, in minutes (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone608.00577.77592.85
Placebo464.00506.00523.33

[back to top]

Total Sleep Time (TST)

minutes spent asleep as recorded in daily sleep diary (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone370.50454.44437.14
Placebo255.66339.33409.44

[back to top]

TST as Assessed by Actigraphy

Subjects wore a Mini Mitter Actiwatch for two continuous weeks at each assessment periods to provide an objective index compared to the assessments made by daily sleep journal. Device is lightweight and worn on non-dominant wrist and contains and omni-directional accelerometer. The accelerometer records the occurrence and degree of motion with a minimal resultant force of .01g. Data are stored as activity counts within a specified epoch. TST recorded by device = total minutes spent asleep (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone367.95405.88394.77
Placebo340.07337.93336.84

[back to top]

Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)

Total minutes of wakefulness recorded after sleep onset. (Recorded in Daily Sleep Diary) WASO= time awake in the middle of the night, not counting SL or time in bed after awakening. Recorded in minutes (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone88.065.5658.57
Placebo117.3381.0061.94

[back to top]

WASO as Assessed by Actigraphy

Subjects wore a Mini Mitter Actiwatch for two continuous weeks at each assessment periods to provide an objective index compared to the assessments made by daily sleep journal. Device is lightweight and worn on non-dominant wrist and contains and omni-directional accelerometer. The accelerometer records the occurrence and degree of motion with a minimal resultant force of .01g. Data are stored as activity counts within a specified epoch. WASO recorded by device = total minutes of wakefulness after sleep onset, in minutes. (NCT00374556)
Timeframe: Mean of baseline, 6 week follow-up, and 12 week follow-up

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Baseline6 week follow-up12 week follow-up
Eszopiclone59.4356.0665.29
Placebo64.7056.3059.70

[back to top]

Mean Number of Awakenings Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

Number of awakenings refers to the number of times a subject awakens between first sleep onset to final awakening. Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 1,4,7,12), single-blind follow-up(week 13), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 15), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 1,4,7,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionnumber of awakenings (Mean)
Week 0 (n=64,61)Week 1 (n=63,64)Week 4 (n=67,67)Week 7 (n=68,67)Week 12 (n=68,67)Weeks 1,4,7,12 (double blind average)(n=68,67)Week 13 (n=68,67)Week 15 (n=68,67)
Eszopiclone22.8421.8622.5122.1922.3722.2722.4822.38
Placebo21.4922.4222.2822.5222.3622.4022.5522.87

[back to top]

Mean Number of Awakenings (Subject-reported) at Various Study Time Points

Number of awakenings is number of times a subject wakes up between initial onset of sleep and final awakening. Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionnumber of awakenings (Mean)
Week 0 (n=190,191)Week 3 (n=190,192)Week 6 (n=192,193)Week 9 (n=192,193)Week 12 (n=192,193)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=192,193)Week 14 (n=192,193)Week 16 (n=192,193)
Eszopiclone2.101.661.551.541.461.551.651.66
Placebo1.951.781.721.621.611.681.581.61

[back to top]

Mean Mental Component Summary of the Short Form-36 Scale Scores

This scale measures subject's perception of their physical health, where normal mean for general US population is 50. Scores above/below 50 represent better/worse than general US population. Change calculated: time point value minus baseline value. Mean values: baseline(week0), double-blind phase(weeks 6,12)& non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,6,12,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,190)Week 6 (n=165,168)Week 12 (n=166,169)Week 16 (n=167,169)
Eszopiclone49.2949.9649.8649.23
Placebo49.6949.4948.9848.68

[back to top]

Mean Insomnia Severity Index Total Scores at Various Study Time Points

The Insomnia Severity Index Total Score ranges from 0-28. Lower scores represent better sleep. Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,190)Week 3 (n=180,183)Week 6 (n=181,184)Week 9 (n=181,185)Week 12 (n=181,185)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=181,185)Week 14 (n=182,185)Week 16 (n=182,185)
Eszopiclone16.1211.0910.4010.129.8410.3611.9413.05
Placebo16.3413.5212.8712.6612.1612.8012.3013.28

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wake Time After Sleep Onset Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

Wake time after sleep onset is the time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. Participants who wore an actigraph wrist monitor to record rest and activity cycles are included; a Central Reader calculated sleep parameters. The change is calculated as time point value minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 1 (n=59,58)Week 4 (n=61,61)Week 7 (n=62,61)Week 12 (n=62,61)Week 13 (n=62,61)Week 15 (n=62,61)
Eszopiclone-6.59-3.88-4.19-2.540.68-0.27
Placebo3.174.676.573.244.987.74

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Time Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

Change from baseline in total sleep time for the subset population who wore an actigraph wrist monitor. The actigraph monitors rest and activity cycles; the resultant data had sleep parameters calculated by a Central Reader. The change is calculated as time point value minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 1 (n=60,58)Week 4 (n=61,61)Week 7 (n=62,61)Week 12 (n=62,61)Week 13 (n=62,61)Week 15 (n=62,61)
Eszopiclone14.9716.8922.1218.08-0.604.06
Placebo3.7217.2115.7218.9315.3613.82

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Nap Time Per Week Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

Change from baseline in the total nap time per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Participants who wore an actigraph wrist monitor to record rest and activity cycles are included; a Central Reader calculated sleep parameters. The change is calculated as time point value minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 1 (n=57,55)Week 4 (n=57,58)Week 7 (n=58,58)Week 12 (n=58,58)Week 13 (n=58,58)Week 15 (n=58,58)
Eszopiclone6.56-56.87-31.85-73.67-87.50-1.99
Placebo2.376.3723.0338.8664.8461.28

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Nap Time Per Week as a Percentage of Total Asleep Time as Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

Change from baseline in total time spent napping per week as a percent of total time asleep for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Change is calculated as time point value minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionpercentage of total asleep time (Mean)
Week 1 (n=57,55)Week 4 (n=57,58)Week 7 (n=58,58)Week 12 (n=58,58)Week 13 (n=58,58)Week 15 (n=58,58)
Eszopiclone-0.17-2.14-1.75-2.70-2.63-0.04
Placebo1.38-0.560.180.460.940.95

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Sheehan Disability Scale Total Score.

Sheehan Disability Scale Total Score (range 0-30)measures subject's level of disability & includes: work/school, social life, family life/home responsibilities, days lost &days underproductive; higher scores represent higher degree of disability/impairment. Change is calculated as time point value minus baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 6,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 6 (n=164,165)Week 12 (n=165,166)Week 14 (n=166,166)Week 16 (n=166,166)
Eszopiclone-4.05-4.48-3.52-2.47
Placebo-2.60-3.73-3.11-3.33

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Subject-reported Awakenings at Various Study Time Points.

The number of awakenings refers to the number of times a subject wakes up between the initial onset of sleep and the final awakening. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionnumber of awakenings (Mean)
Week 3 (n=188,190)Week 6 (n=189,191)Week 9 (n=189,191)Week 12 (n=189,191)Week 14 (n=189,191)Week 16 (n=189,191)
Eszopiclone-0.46-0.56-0.57-0.65-0.46-0.44
Placebo-0.16-0.24-0.33-0.35-0.38-0.35

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Naps Per Week Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

Change from baseline in the number of naps per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Participants who wore an actigraph wrist monitor to record rest and activity cycles are included; a Central Reader calculated sleep parameters. The change is calculated as time point value minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionnumber of naps (Mean)
Week 1 (n=57,55)Week 4 (n=57,58)Week 7 (n=58,58)Week 12 (n=58,58)Week 13 (n=58,58)Week 15 (n=58,58)
Eszopiclone-0.62-3.43-2.83-3.47-4.58-0.64
Placebo1.331.021.681.862.733.41

[back to top]

Mean Ratings of Subject-reported Quality of Sleep at Various Study Time Points

Quality of sleep was rated by participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better quality sleep. Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=190,191)Week 3 (n=190,190)Week 6 (n=192,193)Week 9 (n=192,193)Week 12 (n=192,193)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=192, 193)Week 14 (n=192,193)Week 16 (n=192,193)
Eszopiclone4.685.776.016.176.226.045.915.88
Placebo4.845.225.485.675.785.545.885.73

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) at Various Study Time Points.

Wake time after sleep onset is the time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 3 (n=188,190)Week 6 (n=189,191)Week 9 (n=189,191)Week 12 (n=189,191)Week 14 (n=189,191)Week 16 (n=189,191)
Eszopiclone-29.26-36.57-40.32-39.61-32.27-31.13
Placebo-8.55-13.46-17.67-19.13-22.72-20.18

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Total Sleep Time at Various Study Time Points.

The difference between the total sleep time at baseline and at different time points in the double-blind period (weeks 3,6,9,12), the single-blind follow-up (week 14) and the non-drug treatment follow-up (week 16). The change is calculated as the time point value minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 14, 16

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 3 (n=191,190)Week 6 (n=191,191)Week 9 (n=191,191)Week 12 (n=191,191)Week 14 (n=191,191)Week 16 (n=191,191)
Eszopiclone51.0261.9169.0070.9750.1247.17
Placebo20.6532.4738.7340.8642.7837.43

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Stated as a Percentage of the Total Asleep Time at Various Study Time Points

Change from baseline in the total time spent napping per week stated as a percentage of the total time asleep for subjects who napped during the baseline period. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionpercentage of total asleep time (Mean)
Week 3 (n=110,92)Week 6 (n=110,93)Week 9 (n=110,93)Week 12 (n=110,93)Week 14 (n=110,93)Week 16 (n=110,93)
Eszopiclone-2.77-3.16-2.94-3.04-2.14-2.38
Placebo-1.78-2.52-2.72-2.76-2.31-2.55

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Per Week at Various Study Time Points.

Change from baseline in the total time (minutes) spent napping per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 3 (n=110,92)Week 6 (n=110,93)Week 9 (n=110,93)Week 12 (n=110,93)Week 14 (n=110,93)Week 16 (n=110,93)
Eszopiclone-59.06-65.99-56.59-58.22-44.48-49.15
Placebo-21.66-40.02-40.25-42.15-27.28-38.14

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Sleep Latency at Various Study Time Points

Sleep latency answers the question: How long did it take you to fall asleep last night? The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 3 (n=191,190)Week 6 (n=191,191)Week 9 (n=191,191)Week 12 (n=191,191)Week 14 (n=191,191)Week 16 (n=191,191)
Eszopiclone-21.89-24.13-24.21-28.35-17.00-18.73
Placebo-13.34-19.69-23.02-23.54-25.08-24.61

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Sleep at Various Study Time Points.

Sleep quality was rated by subjects on a scale from 0-10, with higher scores representing better quality sleep. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 3 (n=188,190)Week 6 (n=189,191)Week 9 (n=189,191)Week 12 (n=189,191)Week 14 (n=189,191)Week 16 (n=189, 191)
Eszopiclone1.121.351.521.571.261.22
Placebo0.370.620.810.921.020.88

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Physical Well-being at Various Study Time Points.

Physical well-being was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better well-being. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 3 (n=189,191)Week 6 (n=189,192)Week 9 (n=189,192)Week 12 (n=189,192)Week 14 (n=189,192)Week 16 (n=189,192)
Eszopiclone0.680.840.931.020.890.80
Placebo0.350.460.610.650.720.64

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Depth of Sleep at Various Study Time Points

Depth of sleep was reported by study participants using a scale from 0-10, with higher scores representing better sleep. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 3 (n=188, 190)Week 6 (n=189, 191)Week 9 (n=189, 191)Week 12 (n=189, 191)Week 14 (n=189,191)Week 16 (n=189,191)
Eszopiclone1.071.301.461.491.231.15
Placebo0.400.620.820.931.000.88

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline In Subject-Reported Counts of Number of Naps Per Week at Various Study Time Points

Change from baseline in the number of naps per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionnumber of naps (Mean)
Week 3 (n=110,92)Week 6 (n=110,93)Week 9 (n=110, 93)Week 12 (n=110, 93)Week 14 (n=110,93)Week 16 (n=110,93)
Eszopiclone-1.15-1.26-1.33-1.18-1.00-1.29
Placebo-0.39-0.80-0.96-0.96-0.71-0.92

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Ability to Function at Various Study Time Points

Ability to function was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better ability to function. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 3 (n=189,191)Week 6 (n=189,192)Week 9 (n=189,192)Week 12 (n=189,192)Week 14 (n=189,192)Week 16 (n=189,192)
Eszopiclone0.690.870.981.080.960.87
Placebo0.360.460.620.690.750.69

[back to top]

Mean Values for Wake Time After Sleep Onset Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

Wake time after sleep onset is time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. Mean values reported: baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 1,4,7,12), single-blind follow-up(week 13), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 15) & average for double-blind phase(average of weeks 1,4,7,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: weeks 0,1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 0 (n=64,61)Week 1 (n=63,64)Week 4 (n=67,67)Week 7 (n=68,67)Week 12 (n=68,67)Weeks 1,4,7,12 (double blind average)(n=68,67)Week 13 (n=68,67)Week 15 (n=68,67)
Eszopiclone63.7555.3958.8658.0960.2258.2163.0162.27
Placebo60.2763.5364.1665.8162.4163.6964.0967.07

[back to top]

Mean Total Sleep Time Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

Total sleep time for subset who wore actigraph wrist monitor which monitors rest and activity cycles, sleep parameters calculated by Central Reader. Mean values reported:baseline(week0), double-blind(weeks1,4,7,12), single-blind follow-up(week13), non-drug follow-up(week15) & average for double-blind(average of weeks1,4,7,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 0 (n=64,61)Week 1 (n=64,64)Week 4 (n=67,67)Week 7 (n=68,67)Week 12 (n=68,67)Weeks 1,4,7,12 (double blind average)(n=68,67)Week 13 (n=68,67)Week 15 (n=68,67)
Eszopiclone367.95381.52382.39386.96382.04383.30364.87369.23
Placebo351.06354.11366.69368.58368.70365.13366.47365.73

[back to top]

Mean Total Nap Time Per Week Measured by Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points.

The total nap time per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 1,4,7,12), single-blind follow-up(week 13), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 15), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 1,4,7,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Week 0,1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 0 (n=62,58)Week 1 (n=57,55)Week 4 (n=57,58)Week 7 (n=58,58)Week 12 (n=58,58)Weeks 1,4,7,12 (double blind average)(n=58,58)Week 13 (n=58,58)Week 15 (n=58,58)
Eszopiclone438.02445.84381.15406.16364.34397.11350.52436.03
Placebo418.49399.19403.18414.68430.50412.91456.48452.93

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in the Number of Awakenings Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points.

Number of awakenings refers to the number of times a subject awakens between first sleep onset to final awakening. Participants who wore an actigraph wrist monitor to record rest and activity cycles are included; a Central Reader calculated sleep parameters. The change is calculated as time point value minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionnumber of awakenings (Mean)
Week 1 (n=59,58)Week 4 (n=61,61)Week 7 (n=62,61)Week 12 (n=62,61)Week 13 (n=62,61)Week 15 (n=62,61)
Eszopiclone-0.540.04-0.21-0.100.01-0.13
Placebo0.760.790.880.951.101.36

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Daytime Alertness at Various Study Time Points

Daytime alertness was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better alertness. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 3 (n=189,191)Week 6 (n=189,192)Week 9 (n=189,192)Week 12 (n=189,192)Week 14 (n=189,192)Week 16 (n=189,192)
Eszopiclone0.760.991.101.211.050.97
Placebo0.390.550.720.780.850.78

[back to top]

Mean Total Nap Time Per Week as a Percentage of Total Asleep Time Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

The total time spent napping per week as a percent of the total time asleep for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Mean values reported: baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 1,4,7,12), single-blind follow-up(week 13), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 15) & average for double-blind phase(average of weeks 1,4,7,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Week 0,1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionpercentage of total asleep time (Median)
Week 0 (n=62,58)Week 1 (n=57,55)Week 4 (n=57,58)Week 7 (n=58,58)Week 12 (n=58,58)Weeks 1,4,7,12 (double blind average)(n=58,58)Week 13 (n=58,58)Week 15 (n=58,58)
Eszopiclone14.0513.8911.9212.3011.3612.3011.4314.01
Placebo15.1216.2914.3514.9015.1815.1615.6615.66

[back to top]

Mean Subject-reported Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) at Various Study Time Points

Wake time after sleep onset is the time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the average for the entire double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 0 (n=190,191)Week 3 (n=190,192)Week 6 (n=192,193)Week 9 (n=192,193)Week 12 (n=192,193)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=192,193)Week 14 (n=192,193)Week 16 (n=192,193)
Eszopiclone92.6664.3356.4952.7553.4556.6860.7161.84
Placebo90.8683.1777.8673.3372.0276.5968.3971.27

[back to top]

Mean Subject-reported Total Sleep Time in Minutes at Various Study Time Points.

The mean total minutes asleep each night at different time points: baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), the single-blind follow-up(week 14),the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the double-blind average(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 14, 16

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,191)Week 3 (n=192,192)Week 6 (n=192,193)Week 9 (n=192,193)Week 12 (n=192,193)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=192,193)Week 14 (n=192,193)Week 16 (n=192,193)
Eszopiclone297.86347.37358.72365.80367.75360.08347.12344.20
Placebo294.03314.53326.25332.47334.69326.98336.55331.29

[back to top]

Mean Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Per Week Stated as a Percentage of the Total Asleep Time at Various Study Time Points

Total time spent napping per week stated as a percentage of total time asleep for subjects who napped during baseline period. Mean values reported: baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), & average for double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionpercentage of total asleep time (Median)
Week 0 (n=111,94)Week 3 (n=110,92)Week 6 (n=110,93)Week 9 (n=110,93)Week 12 (n=110,93)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=110,93)Week 14 (n=110,93)Week 16 (n=110,93)
Eszopiclone7.024.333.914.134.044.094.934.69
Placebo9.057.356.616.416.376.686.826.57

[back to top]

Mean Subject-Reported Total Nap Time at Various Study Time Points

The total time (minutes) spent napping per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 0 (n=111,94)Week 3 (n=110,92)Week 6 (n=110,93)Week 9 (n=110,93)Week 12 (n=110,93)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=110,93)Week 14 (n=110,93)Week 16 (n=110,93)
Eszopiclone171.62114.43106.99116.39114.76112.92128.50123.83
Placebo189.31169.24150.88150.65148.75154.88163.61152.76

[back to top]

Mean Subject-reported Sleep Latency Reported at Various Study Time Points.

Sleep latency answers the question: How long did it take you to fall asleep last night? Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the average for the entire double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,191)Week 3 (n=192,192)Week 6 (n=192,193)Week 9 (n=192,193)Week 12 (n=192,193)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=192,193)Week 14 (n=192,193)Week 16 (n=192,193)
Eszopiclone75.6854.6952.1151.7547.6651.5158.8957.17
Placebo82.1768.8062.5759.2358.6962.3257.2357.62

[back to top]

Mean Subject-reported Physical Well-Being at Various Study Time Points

Physical well-being was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better well-being. Mean values reported: baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), & average for double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,193)Week 3 (n=190,191)Week 6 (n=190,192)Week 9 (n=190,192)Week 12 (n=190,192)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=190,192)Week 14 (n=190,192)Week 16 (n=190,192)
Eszopiclone5.626.306.466.566.656.496.516.43
Placebo5.455.805.926.066.115.976.186.09

[back to top]

Mean Subject-Reported Number of Naps Each Week at Various Study Time Points.

The mean number of naps per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionnumber of naps (Mean)
Week 0 (n=111,94)Week 3 (n=110,92)Week 6 (n=110,93)Week 9 (n=110,93)Week 12 (n=110,93)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=110,93)Week 14 (n=110,93)Week 16 (n=110,93)
Eszopiclone3.882.762.642.572.712.662.902.61
Placebo4.033.673.263.103.103.283.353.14

[back to top]

Mean Subject-reported Depth of Sleep at Various Study Time Points

Depth of sleep was reported by study participants using a scale from 0-10, with higher scores representing better sleep. Mean values reported: baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=190,191)Week 3 (n=190,192)Week 6 (n=192,193)Week 9 (n=192,193)Week 12 (n=192, 193)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=192,193)Week 14 (n=192,193)Week 16 (n=192,193)
Eszopiclone4.725.766.006.156.186.025.925.84
Placebo4.875.295.515.715.825.585.895.76

[back to top]

Mean Subject-reported Daytime Alertness at Various Study Time Points.

Daytime alertness was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better alertness. Mean values reported: baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,193)Week 3 (n=190,191)Week 6 (n=190,192)Week 9 (n=190,192)Week 12 (n=190,192)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=190,192)Week 14 (n=190,192)Week 16 (n=190,192)
Eszopiclone5.426.186.416.526.646.446.476.39
Placebo5.345.745.896.066.135.956.196.13

[back to top]

Mean Subject-reported Ability to Function at Various Study Time Points

Ability to function was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better ability to function. Mean values reported: baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) & average for double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,193)Week 3 (n=190,191)Week 6 (n=190,192)Week 9 (n=190,192)Week 12 (n=190,192)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=190,192)Week 14 (n=190,192)Week 16 (n=190,192)
Eszopiclone5.696.386.576.696.796.616.666.57
Placebo5.625.986.096.246.326.166.386.31

[back to top]

Mean Subject-reported Ability to Concentrate at Various Study Time Points

Ability to concentrate was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better concentration. Mean values reported: baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), single-blind follow-up(week 14), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) & average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 3,6,9,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,193)Week 3 (n=190,191)Week 6 (n=190,192)Week 9 (n=190,192)Week 12 (n=190,192)Weeks 3,6,9,12 (double blind average)(n=190,192)Week 14 (n=190,192)Week 16 (n=190,192)
Eszopiclone5.636.376.576.676.776.606.646.56
Placebo5.665.996.106.276.336.176.396.33

[back to top]

Mean Sleep Latency Values Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points.

Sleep latency:measurement of time to fall asleep. Values are for subset who wore an actigraph wrist monitor which monitors rest and activity cycles; sleep parameters calculated by Central Reader. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 0 (n=64,61)Week 1 (n=64,64)Week 4 (n=67,67)Week 7 (n=68,67)Week 12 (n=68,67)Weeks 1,4,7,12 (double blind average)(n=68,67)Week 13 (n=68,67)Week 15 (n=68,67)
Eszopiclone23.8926.7226.6226.8936.9329.2243.0634.35
Placebo31.3437.7428.5531.0627.8931.2030.4028.80

[back to top]

Mean Sheehan Disability Total Scores

Sheehan Disability Scale Total Score (range 0-30) measures subject's level of disability; includes work/school, social life, family life/home responsibilities, days lost, days underproductive; higher scores represent higher degree of disability/impairment. Mean values reported: baseline, double-blind(weeks 6,12)& follow-up(weeks 14,16). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,6,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,190)Week 6 (n=165,168)Week 12 (n=166,169)Week 14 (n=166,166)Week 16 (n=167,169)
Eszopiclone11.137.527.088.039.06
Placebo11.388.877.708.378.12

[back to top]

Mean Physical Component Summary of the Short Form-36 Scale Scores.

This scale measures subject's perception of their physical health, where the normal mean for general US population is 50.Scores above/below 50 represent better/worse than general US population. Change calculated as time point value minus baseline value: baseline(week0), double-blind (weeks 6,12)and non-drug treatment follow-up(week16). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Weeks 0,6,12,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 0 (n=192,190)Week 6 (n=165,168)Week 12 (n=166,169)Week 16 (n=167,169)
Eszopiclone45.3946.0846.1245.51
Placebo43.9945.0645.3844.70

[back to top]

Mean Number of Naps Per Week Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

The number of naps per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Mean values are reported at baseline(week 0), double-blind phase(weeks 1,4,7,12), single-blind follow-up(week 13), non-drug treatment follow-up(week 15), and the average for the double-blind phase(average of weeks 1,4,7,12 values). (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Week 0,1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionnumber of naps (Mean)
Week 0 (n=62,58)Week 1 (n=57,55)Week 4 (n=57,58)Week 7 (n=58,58)Week 12 (n=58,58)Weeks 1,4,7,12 (double blind average)(n=58,58)Week 13 (n=58,58)Week 15 (n=58,58)
Eszopiclone22.3321.6918.9019.5018.8619.6617.7521.69
Placebo20.5220.9420.6321.0721.2521.0122.1222.80

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Insomnia Severity Index Total Score Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Change from baseline in the Insomnia Severity Index Total Score which ranges from 0-28. Lower scores represent better sleep. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-3.42
Eszopiclone-5.67

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Awakenings Using Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Number of awakenings refers to the number of times a subject awakens between first sleep onset to final awakening. Change is calculated as average over double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 1,4,7,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionnumber of awakenings (Mean)
Placebo0.87
Eszopiclone-0.18

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Number of Naps Per Week Measured Using Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Change from baseline in the number of naps per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 1,4,7,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionnumber of naps (Mean)
Placebo1.61
Eszopiclone-2.67

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Measured Using Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Sleep latency is the time it takes to fall asleep. Participants who wore an actigraph wrist monitor to record rest and activity cycles are included; a Central Reader calculated sleep parameters. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 1,4,7,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo0.00
Eszopiclone1.47

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Ability to Concentrate Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period.

Ability to concentrate was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better concentration. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseliine (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.50
Eszopiclone0.96

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Ability to Function Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Period

Ability to function was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better ability to function. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.53
Eszopiclone0.91

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Counts of Number of Naps Per Week Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Change from baseline in the number of naps per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose)- week 12

Interventionnumber of naps (Mean)
Placebo-0.78
Eszopiclone-1.23

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Depth of Sleep for the Average Reported During the Double-blind Period.

Depth of sleep was reported by study participants using a scale from 0-10, with higher scores representing better sleep. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.69
Eszopiclone1.33

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Number of Awakenings Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period.

The number of awakenings is the number of times a subject wakes up between the initial onset of sleep and the final awakening. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - Week12

Interventionnumber of awakenings (Mean)
Placebo-0.27
Eszopiclone-0.56

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Physical Well-Being Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Physical well-being was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better well-being. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.52
Eszopiclone0.87

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Sleep Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Quality of sleep was rated by participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better quality sleep. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - Week12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.68
Eszopiclone1.39

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Sleep Latency (SL) Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Period.

Sleep latency answers how long it takes to fall asleep. The difference between the sleep latency at baseline and the average sleep latency over the double blind period(average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) reported by the participant. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - Week12

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo-19.92
Eszopiclone-24.62

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Per Week as a Percent of Total Asleep Time Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Change from baseline in the total time spent napping per week stated as a percentage of the total time asleep for subjects who napped during the baseline period. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionpercentage of total asleep time (Mean)
Placebo-2.44
Eszopiclone-2.98

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-Reported Total Sleep Time (TST) Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period.

The difference between the total sleep time at baseline and the average total sleep time over the double blind period(average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) reported by the participant. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose)-12 weeks

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo33.18
Eszopiclone63.24

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) Averaged Over the 12 Week Double-blind Study Period.

Wake time after sleep onset (WASO) is the time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. The difference between WASO at baseline and the average WASO over the double blind period(average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12). The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) -week 12

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo-14.75
Eszopiclone-36.40

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Nap Time Per Week as a Percentage of Total Asleep Time Measured by Actigraphy and Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period.

Change from baseline in the total time spent napping per week as a percent of the total time asleep for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 1,4,7,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionpercentage of total asleep time (Mean)
Placebo0.45
Eszopiclone-1.75

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Time Measured by Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Participants who wore an actigraph wrist monitor, which monitors rest and activity cycles are included; the resultant data had total sleep time calculated by a Central Reader. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 1,4,7,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo14.40
Eszopiclone17.96

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) Measured by Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Wake time after sleep onset is the time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. Change is calculated as average over double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 1,4,7,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo4.50
Eszopiclone-4.24

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline Total Nap Time Per Week Measured by Actigraphy Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Change from baseline in the total nap time per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. Change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 1,4,7,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo21.26
Eszopiclone-40.91

[back to top]

Mean Change in Subject-reported Daytime Alertness Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Daytime alertness was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better alertness. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo0.61
Eszopiclone1.02

[back to top]

Mean Change in Subject-Reported Total Nap Time Per Week Averaged Over the 12 Week Double Blind Study Period

Change from baseline in the total time (minutes) spent napping per week for subjects who napped during the baseline period. The change is calculated as the average over the double blind period (average of post-dose values from weeks 3,6,9,12) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Day 1 (post first dose) - week 12

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Placebo-36.02
Eszopiclone-60.06

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Insomnia Severity Index Total Score at Various Study Time Points

Change from baseline in the Insomnia Severity Index Total Score which ranges from 0-28. Lower scores represent better sleep. The change is calculated as time point value minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 3 (n=179,181)Week 6 (n=180,181)Week 9 (n=180,182)Week 12 (n=180,182)Week 14 (n=181,182)Week 16 (n=181,182)
Eszopiclone-4.94-5.67-5.89-6.18-4.06-2.96
Placebo-2.74-3.35-3.55-4.05-3.93-2.96

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary of the Short Form-36 Scale Scores

Mental component summary of Short Form-36 Scale measures subject's perception of their physical health, where the normal mean for general US population is 50. Scores above/below 50 represent better than/worse than the general US population. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Change is calculated as time point value minus baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 6,12,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 6 (n=164,165)Week 12 (n=165,166)Week 16 (n=166,166)
Eszopiclone0.960.830.20
Placebo-0.44-0.94-1.22

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary of the Short Form-36 Scale

Physical component summary of Short Form-36 Scale measures subject's perception of their physical health, where the normal mean for general US population is 50.Scores above/below 50 represent better than/worse than the general US population. Higher scores represent better outcomes. Change is calculated as time point value minus baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 6, 12, 16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 6 (n=164,165)Week 12 (n=165,166)Week 16 (n=166,166)
Eszopiclone1.001.010.39
Placebo1.011.380.69

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Measured Using Actigraphy at Various Study Time Points

Sleep latency is a measurement of the time it takes to fall asleep. Participants who wore an actigraph wrist monitor to record rest and activity cycles are included; a Central Reader calculated sleep parameters. The change is calculated as time point value minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 1,4,7,12,13,15

,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
Week 1 (n=60,58)Week 4 (n=61,61)Week 7 (n=62,61)Week 12 (n=62,61)Week 13 (n=62,61)Week 15 (n=62,61)
Eszopiclone-0.25-1.48-1.629.3416.136.44
Placebo9.06-2.160.12-3.92-0.69-3.66

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Ability to Concentrate at Various Study Time Points.

Ability to concentrate was rated by study participants on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores representing better concentration. The change is calculated as value during double-blind phase(weeks 3,6,9,12), or the single-blind follow-up(week 14), or the non-drug treatment follow-up(week 16) minus the baseline value. (NCT00386334)
Timeframe: Baseline (week 0), Weeks 3,6,9,12,14,16

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 3 (n=189,191)Week 6 (n=189,192)Week 9 (n=189,192)Week 12 (n=189,192)Week 14 (n=189,192)Week 16 (n=189,192)
Eszopiclone0.730.931.031.141.000.93
Placebo0.320.430.600.660.720.66

[back to top]

Change in Total Sleep Time (TST) as Recorded in Patient Diaries

Difference in total sleep time between week 4 and baseline (NCT00392041)
Timeframe: week 4

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Eszopiclone68.72
Placebo13.47

[back to top]

Sleep Efficiency

Percentage of time in bed at night asleep, averaged over 3 nights, as measured by actigraphy (and by polysomnography in a subgroup of subjects), holding constant time in bed and recording time (NCT00460993)
Timeframe: 6 days

Interventionpercentage of sleep (Median)
Group 170.0
Group 265.8

[back to top]

Level of Insomnia as Measured by the Insomnia Severity Index

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI): 13-item self-report measure which examines symptoms of insomnia, consequences of insomnia, and subjective distress related to sleep problems. Subjects rate the symptoms and consequences of insomnia on a 5 point Likert scales. For example, subjects are asked to rate the severity of their insomnia (e.g., difficulty falling asleep from 0=none to 4=very severe). Scores on the first 7 items are summed for a total insomnia score ranging from 0-28. (NCT00511134)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after target smoking quit date

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Median)
Zyban + Lunesta11
Zyban + Placebo5

[back to top]

Smoking Abstinence as Measured by Self Reported Smoking and Confirmed by CO Level

Endpoint abstinence will be defined as 0 cigarettes over the seven days prior to the subject's Timeline Follow-Back evaluation at the end of week 7 (end of trial) and a Carbon Monoxide (CO) level ≤ 5. (NCT00511134)
Timeframe: 6 weeks after target smoking quite date

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Zyban + Lunesta1
Zyban + Placebo1

[back to top]

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

The STAI is a 20 item scale that measures current anxiety symptoms with scores that range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater levels of anxiety. The norm for working adults is a score of 34. (NCT00515177)
Timeframe: 8 weeks and 5 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
8 week5 months
MBSR32.930.1
Pharmacotherapy Control Arm31.328.3

[back to top]

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

The PSQI is a 19-item self-reported sleep quality measure with scores that range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. Scores greater than 5 indicate poor sleep. (NCT00515177)
Timeframe: 8 weeks and 5 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
8 weeks5 months
MBSR7.77.0
Pharmacotherapy Control Arm9.28.2

[back to top]

Medical Outcome Study Short Form (SF-12)

Mental component summary score (MCS) of the SF-12 is a self-reported measure of mental health-related quality of life. Scores are reported as standardized T-scores, where an average (mean) score in the general population is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Scores of 40 or less indicate impaired mental health quality or function. (NCT00515177)
Timeframe: 8 weeks and 5 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
8 week5 months
MBSR48.849.7
Pharmacotherapy Control Arm48.350.1

[back to top]

Insomnia Severity Index

The Insomnia Severity Index is a 7-item scale that provides a total score indicating current (e.g., last 2 weeks) severity of insomnia symptoms with scores that can range from 0 to 28. Scores of 15 or higher indicate clinical insomnia. (NCT00515177)
Timeframe: 8 weeks and 5 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
8 week5 months
MBSR9.68.1
Pharmacotherapy Control Arm9.17.8

[back to top]

Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

The CES-D is a 20-item self-report scale to measure symptoms of depression in the past week with scores having a range of 0 to 60 and a score of 16 or higher indicating clinically relevant symptoms. (NCT00515177)
Timeframe: 8 weeks and 5 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
8 week5 months
MBSR10.08.4
Pharmacotherapy Control Arm10.17.0

[back to top]

Actigraphy

Total Sleep Time from Actigraphy (NCT00515177)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionhours (Mean)
MBSR6.2
Pharmacotherapy Control Arm6.9

[back to top]

Post-treatment Leptin Levels

Leptin levels following two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, measured after an overnight fast (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: two months post-treatment

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Active5.49
Placebo15.28

[back to top]

Post-treatment Ghrelin Levels

Ghrelin levels following two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, measured after an overnight fast (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: 2 months post-treatment

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Active544.95
Placebo670.94

[back to top]

Change in Total Sleep Time Measured by PSG

Change (baseline minus post-treatment) in total sleep time measured by polysomnography after two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Active2.9
Placebo-6.4

[back to top]

Change in Total Sleep Time as Reported in Sleep Diaries

Total sleep time reported on sleep diaries prior to treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo. Change defined as baseline minus post-treatment). (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

Interventionhours (Mean)
Active.58
Placebo.09

[back to top]

Change in Subjective Sleepiness as Measured on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS)

"At visits before and after two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, subjects completed a short test battery including the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) every three hours during wake periods. KSS is a single-item scale of sleepiness on a scale from 1 (very alert) to 9 (very sleepy, fighting sleep, an effort to keep awake). Subjective sleepiness was defined as mean deviation from baseline KSS." (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Active0.53
Placebo0.38

[back to top]

Change in Mean Lapses of Attention

At visits before and after two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, subjects completed a short test battery every three hours during wake periods. The battery included the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT). The PVT involved a 10-minute visual reaction time (RT) performance test in which the subject was instructed to maintain the fastest possible RT to a simple visual stimulus. Lapses of attention refer to the number of times the subject failed to respond to the signal within 500ms. Mean lapses per test across 6 tests given a 4 hour intervals during normal waking hours (and not during the IVGTT) during the 30-hr were compared for the post-treatment visit as the absolute deviation from the baseline mean lapses/test. (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

Interventionlapses of attention (Mean)
Active-0.04
Placebo0.07

[back to top]

Change in Insulin Sensitivity (SI)

"Insulin sensitivity index (SI) was defined in quantitative terms as the effect of insulin to catalyse the disappearance of glucose from plasma. [R. Bergman, Horm Res 2005;64(suppl 3):8-15].~SI calculated using Bergman's Minimal model analyses (Minmod Millennium 2000; R. Bergman, University of South- ern California, Los Angeles, CA)" (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

InterventionmU/l)^-1*min^-1 (Mean)
Active-1.19
Placebo0.05

[back to top]

Change in HbA1c Levels

Difference in HbA1c levels following two months treatment with eszopiclone versus placebo (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

Interventionpercentage of glycosylation (Mean)
Active.03
Placebo-.09

[back to top]

Change in Glucose Tolerance (Kg) in Response to Insulin-modified Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test

Difference in glucose tolerance (Kg) in response to insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test. Glucose tolerance was calculated as the slope of the natural log of declining glucose values from minute 5 to minute 19 post-infusion. By convention, this negative slope is multiplied by -1, in other words, expressed as a rate of disposal. (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

Intervention%/min, slope of natural log glucose (Mean)
Active.33
Placebo-0.10

[back to top]

Change in Glucose Effectiveness (SG)

"Glucose effectiveness was defined as the ability of glucose itself to enhance its own disappearance independent of an increment in insulin. [R. Bergman, Horm Res 2005;64(suppl 3):8-15].~SG calculated using Bergman's Minimal model analyses (Minmod Millennium 2000; R. Bergman, University of South- ern California, Los Angeles, CA)" (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

Interventionmin^-1 (Mean)
Active0.001
Placebo0.001

[back to top]

Pre-Treatment Leptin Levels

Leptin Levels prior to two months treatment with eszopiclone or placebo, measure after an overnight fast (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Active4.99
Placebo16.53

[back to top]

Pre-treatment Ghrelin Levels

Ghrelin levels prior to two months treatment with 3mg eszopiclone or placebo, measured after an overnight fast (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Active573.14
Placebo648.41

[back to top]

Acute Insulin Response to Glucose (AIRg)

Change over two months in 1st phase Insulin secretion (NCT00555750)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 months post-treatment

InterventionmU*l^-1*min (Mean)
Active94.0
Placebo25.1

[back to top]

Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) 50% Anxiolytic Response

"The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). A 50% anxiolytic response was defined as a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the HAM-A total score.~The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms." (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 6, 8

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm27495366
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm16415257
Placebo Arm21395163

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression- Improvement (CGI-I)

"CGI-I was completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represented the clinician's subjective assessment of improvement of the subject's anxiety symptoms based on the following question, Compared to his/her condition at Visit 2, how much has he/she changed? The score was based on the following scale: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. CGI-I score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating less improvement." (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 9, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8Week 9
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm3.12.72.72.62.4
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm3.22.92.62.62.5
Placebo Arm3.22.92.72.62.4

[back to top]

Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Remission

"The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Remission was defined as a HAM-A total score of 7 or less.~The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms." (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Week 2, 4, 6, 8 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 6Week 8
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm9242334
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm2101929
Placebo Arm7112231

[back to top]

Change in Individual Item Scores on HAM-A

The HAM-A was administered by a site trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items include: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a t5-point scale (0-4). Each HAM-A individual item score can range from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety questions. (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Anxious Mood-BaselineAnxious Mood-Week 2 -Change from baselineAnxious Mood-Week 4 - Change from baselineAnxious Mood-Week 6 - Change from baselineAnxious Mood-Week 8- Change from baselineTension - BaselineTension - Week 2 -Change from baselineTension - Week 4 - Change from baselineTension - Week 6- Change from baselineTension - Week 8- Change from baselineFears- BaselineFears- Week 2- Change from baselineFears- Week 4- Change from baselineFears- Week 6- Change from baselineFears- Week 8- Change from baselineInsomnia- BaselineInsomnia- Week 2- Change from baselineInsomnia- Week 4- Change from baselineInsomnia- Week 6- Change from baselineinsomnia- Week 8- Change from baselineIntellectual- BaselineIntellectual- Week 2- Change from baselineIntellectual- Week 4- Change from baselineIntellectual- Week 6- Change from baselineIntellectual- Week 8- Change from baselineDepressed Mood- BaselineDepressed Mood- Week 2- Change from baselineDepressed Mood- Week 4- Change in baselineDepressed Mood- Week 6- Change from baselineDepressed Mood- Week 8- Change from baselineSomatic Complaints-Muscular-BaselineSomatic Complaints-Muscular-Wk 2-Chg from baselineSomatic Complaints-Muscular-Wk 4-Chg from baselineSomatic Complaints-Muscular-Wk 6-Chg from baselineSomatic Complaints-Muscular-Wk 8-Chg from baselineSomatic Complaints-Sensory-BaselineSomatic Complaints-Sensory-Wk 2-Chg from baselineSomatic Complaints-Sensory-Wk 4-Chg from baselineSomatic Complaints-Sensory-Wk 6-Chg from baselineSomatic Complaints-Sensory-Wk 8-Chg from baselineCardiovascular symptoms-baselineCardiovascular symptoms-Wk 2-Chg. from baselineCardiovascular symptoms-Wk 4-Chg. from baselineCardiovascular symptoms-Wk 6-Chg. from baselineCardiovascular symptoms-Wk 8-Chg. from baselineRespiratory Symptoms-BaselineRespiratory Symptoms-Wk 2 Change from baselineRespiratory Symptoms-Wk 4 Change from baselineRespiratory Symptoms-Wk 6 Change from baselineRespiratory Symptoms-Wk 8 Change from baselineGastrointestinal Symptoms- BaselineGastrointestinal Symptoms-Wk2-Change from baselineGastrointestinal Symptoms-Wk4-Change from baselineGastrointestinal Symptoms-Wk6-Change from baselineGastrointestinal Symptoms-Wk8-Change from baselineGenitourinary Symptoms-BaselineGenitourinary Symptoms-Wk 2-Change from baselineGenitourinary Symptoms-Wk 4-Change from baselineGenitourinary Symptoms-Wk 6-Change from baselineGenitourinary Symptoms-Wk 8-Change from baselineAutonomic Symptoms-BaselineAutonomic Symptoms-Wk 2-Change from baselineAutonomic Symptoms-Wk 4-Change from baselineAutonomic Symptoms-Wk 6-Change from baselineAutonomic Symptoms-Wk 8-Change from baselineBehavior at Interview-BaselineBehavior at Interview-Wk 2- Change from baselineBehavior at Interview-Wk 4- Change from baselineBehavior at Interview-Wk 6- Change from baselineBehavior at Interview-Wk 8- Change from baseline
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm2.8-0.6-0.9-1.0-1.12.7-0.6-0.8-1.0-1.01.0-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.42.6-0.8-0.9-0.9-1.02.2-0.5-0.7-0.8-0.91.0-0.2-0.3-0.3-0.31.8-0.5-0.6-0.6-0.71.2-0.51.0-0.5-0.51.3-0.5-0.6-0.6-0.71.3-0.4-0.5-0.5-0.71.3-0.3-0.4-0.5-0.51.4-0.3-0.4-0.3-0.41.8-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.61.8-0.4-0.5-0.7-0.7
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm2.8-0.5-0.8-0.8-0.92.6-0.4-0.6-0.8-0.91.2-0.4-0.5-0.5-0.72.5-0.5-0.8-0.8-0.82.1-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.81.2-0.2-0.3-0.3-0.41.9-0.3-0.5-0.7-0.71.0-0.2-0.3-0.4-0.41.2-0.4-0.7-0.6-0.81.2-0.3-0.5-0.5-0.61.4-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.61.4-0.2-0.4-0.4-0.51.8-0.3-0.5-0.6-0.71.8-0.3-0.6-0.7-0.6
Placebo Arm2.8-0.6-0.8-1.0-1.02.7-0.5-0.8-0.9-0.91.1-0.3-0.4-0.4-0.52.5-0.5-0.8-0.8-0.92.1-0.4-0.8-0.7-0.91.1-0.3-0.4-0.3-0.42.0-0.5-0.7-0.8-0.91.0-0.3-0.4-0.4-0.51.1-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.71.2-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.61.4-0.3-0.5-0.6-0.61.5-0.4-0.4-0.5-0.61.8-0.4-0.5-0.6-0.81.8-0.4-0.6-0.7-0.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

The SDS was completed by the subject and captured the subject's level of disability. The subject rated the extent to which his or her work, social life or leisure activities, and home life or family responsibilities were impaired by his or her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. SDS total score can range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher functional impairment. (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2- Change from baselineWeek 4- Change from baselineWeek 6- Change from baselineWeek 8- Change from baseline
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm14.8-2.7-3.5-4.1-4.4
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm14.0-0.9-2.5-3.4-4.1
Placebo Arm15.3-2.5-3.6-4.2-5.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Short Form

The Q-LES-Q was completed by the subject and assessed quaility of life based on 16 items, each evaluated on a 5-point scale of overall level of enjoyment/satisfaction: 1=very poor; 2=poor; 3=fair; 4=good; 5=very good. The overall percentage score was computed as a sum of items 1 to 14 as expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score: Overall Percentage Score = Sum [item 1... item 14]-14)/(70-14 ) *100%. Q-LES-Q overall percentage score can range from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating higher quality of life. (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2- Change from baselineWeek 4- Change from baselineWeek 6- Change from baselineWeek 8- Change from baseline
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm52.01.54.65.05.8
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm52.22.15.46.76.8
Placebo Arm52.43.14.75.87.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) Total Score

The ISI was completed by the subject and is an assessment of the severity of insomnia. The administered extended ISI questionnaire consists of 5 items (containing 7 questions, as item 1 contains 3 questions) comprising the original ISI questionnaire, plus 6 quality of life related items (sleep quality, restedness/refreshness upon arising, daytime fatigue, attention/concentration, relationships and mood disturbances), and 2 items assessing duration and frequency of sleep problems. All items, except for the insomnia duration and frequency questions, are measured on a Likert-type 5-point scale (0-4). ISI total score can range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating more severe insomnia. (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on lst observation carried forward (LOCF)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2- Change from baselineWeek 4- Change from baselineWeek 6- Change from baselineWeek 8- Change from baseline
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm14.1-2.7-3.4-3.6-4.1
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm14.3-1.5-3.1-3.6-3.5
Placebo Arm14.6-2.4-3.6-4.0-4.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)

"The CGI-Swas completed by a board certified psychiatrist and represents the clinician's subjective assessment of severity of the subject's anxiety symptoms as assessed by a 7-scale score for a single question, Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how anxious is the subject at this time? The score was based on the following scale: 1=normal, not at all anxious; 2=borderline anxious; 3=mildly anxious; 4=moderately anxious; 5=markedly anxious; 6=severly anxious; 7=among the most extremely anxious subjects. CGI-S score can range from 0 to 7, with higher values indicating higher severity." (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2 - Change from baselineWeek 4- Change from baselineWeek 6- Change from baselineWeek 8- Change from baseline
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm4.4-0.7-1.0-1.2-1.3
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm4.3-0.4-0.8-1.0-1.2
Placebo Arm4.4-0.6-0.9-1.1-1.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) Total Score (Except for Week 8)

The HAM-A was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-A rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. all items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6 based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

,,
Interventionunit on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2 - Change from baselineWeek 4-Change from baselineWeek 6- Change from baseline
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm24.0-6.0-8.0-8.5
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm24.0-4.8-7.6-8.7
Placebo Arm24.2-5.7-8.1-8.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Total Score on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), as Assessed by the Site-trained Rater

THe HAM-M was administered by a site-trained rater and measured the severity of the subjects' anxiety symptoms using 14 items of the HAM-M rating scale. These items included: anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, intellectual, depressed mood, somatic complaints-muscular, somatic complaints-sensory, cardiovascular symptoms, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, genitourinary symptoms, autonomic symptoms, and behavior at interview. All items are measured on a 5-point scale (0-4). The Ham-A total score can range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher severity of anxiety symptoms. (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 8

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Placebo Arm-10.0
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm-9.3
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm-9.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

ESS was completed by the subject and assessed daytime sedation based on 8 items, each presenting a situation for which the subject needed to evaluate how likely he/she is to doze off or fall asleep in contrast to feeling just tired. Each item was evaluated on the following scale: 0 = would never doze; 1 = slight chance of dozing; 2 = moderate chance of dozing; 3 = high chance of dozing. ESS total score can range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher levels of daytime sleepiness. (NCT00616655)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, based on last observation carried forward (LOCF)

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 2- Change from baselineWeek 4- Change from baselineWeek 6- Change from baselineWeek 8- Change from baseline
Eszopiclone High Dose Arm8.5-0.4-0.7-0.9-1.3
Eszopiclone Low Dose Arm8.4-0.5-1.0-1.3-1.4
Placebo Arm7.4-0.1-0.2-0.6-0.8

[back to top]

Change in Insomnia Severity Index From Baseline.

The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a 7-item self-report questionnaire that provides a global measure of insomnia severity based on several indicators (e.g., difficulty falling or staying asleep, satisfaction with sleep, degree of impairment with daytime functioning). It has adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.91) and temporal stability (r=0.80), has been validated against sleep diary and polysomnography data and was sensitive to change in several insomnia treatment studies. The ISI scale range is: minimum = 0, maximum = 28. The interpretation is that lower is 'better sleep', while higher is considered 'worse sleep/more insomnia'. (NCT00645944)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Eszopiclone Group-10.7
Placebo Group-6.9

[back to top]

Sleep Latency (SL)

The subjective measure, SL, defined as the amount of time measured in minutes it takes to fall asleep was based on participant-reported subjective assessments of sleep disturbance and was obtained from participants' responses to morning questionnaires. Questionnaires were administered during each visit during the treatment period. (NCT00770510)
Timeframe: 10 days (5 intervals of two consecutive nights)

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Placebo62.0
Eszopiclone 1 mg45.5
Eszopiclone 2 mg32.6
Eszopiclone 3 mg28.4
Zolpidem Tartrate 10 mg28.0

[back to top]

Sleep Efficiency

"Sleep efficiency (SE) was an assessment obtained from PSG during the treatment period and was defined as the ratio of total sleep time to the total time in bed of 8 hours * 100, expressed as a percent.~PSG recording was performed according to a manual for overnight PSG. The start time for PSG recording was individualized and scheduled within +/- 30 minutes of the patient's median bedtime as recorded in the sleep diary. During the screening period, participants were provided a diary in which they recorded the time of lights out before bedtime for 1 week pror to PSG evaluations. PSG recording duration for scoring was 8 hours. PSG data recorded during treatment were centrally scored by a trained expert." (NCT00770510)
Timeframe: 10 days (5 intervals of two consecutive nights)

InterventionPercentage of time asleep of 8 hours (Median)
Placebo86.3
Eszopiclone 1 mg91.3
Eszopiclone 2 mg94.3
Eszopiclone 3 mg94.5
Zolpidem Tartrate 10 mg93.5

[back to top]

Latency To Persistent Sleep (LPS)

The objective measure, LPS, defined as the amount of time measured in minutes it takes to fall asleep was based on polysomnography (PSG) objective assessments of sleep disturbance. PSG recording was performed according to a manual for overnight PSG. The start time for PSG recording was individualized and scheduled within +/- 30 minutes of the participant's median bedtime as recorded in the sleep diary. During the screening period, participants were provided a diary in which they recorded the time of lights out before bedtime for 1 week pror to PSG evaluations. PSG recording duration for scoring was 8 hours. PSG data recorded during treatment were centrally scored by a trained expert. (NCT00770510)
Timeframe: 10 days (5 intervals of two consecutive nights)

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
Placebo37.5
Eszopiclone 1 mg24.4
Eszopiclone 2 mg20.9
Eszopiclone 3 mg12.8
Zolpidem Tartrate 10 mg14.3

[back to top]

Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)- Objective & Subjective

"Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) defined as total awakening time from falling asleep to final awakening was objectively determined by polysomnography and subjectively determined based on participant-reported measures following treatment.~The objective WASO was based on PSG assessments. PSG recording was performed according to a manual for overnight PSG. The start time for PSG recording was individualized and scheduled within +/- 30 minutes of the participant's median bedtime as recorded in the sleep diary. PSG recording duration for scoring was 8 hours. PSG data recorded during treatment were centrally scored by a trained expert.~The subjective measure was based on participant-reported subjective assessments and were obtained from participants' responses to morning questionnaires. Questionnaires were administered during each visit during the treatment period." (NCT00770510)
Timeframe: 10 days (5 intervals of two consecutive nights)

,,,,
InterventionMinutes (Median)
Objective Wake Time After Sleep OnsetSubjective Wake Time After Sleep Onset
Eszopiclone 1 mg22.560.0
Eszopiclone 2 mg17.837.5
Eszopiclone 3 mg18.840.0
Placebo26.375.0
Zolpidem Tartrate 10 mg20.050.0

[back to top]

Total Sleep Time (Objective & Subjective)

"Total sleep time defined as total sleeping time from bedtime to final awakening (measured in minutes) was objectively determined by polysomnography and subjectively determined based on participant-reported measures following treatment.~The objective total sleep time was based on PSG-based assessments. PSG recording was performed according to a manual for overnight PSG. The start time for PSG recording was individualized and scheduled within +/- 30 minutes of the participant's median bedtime as recorded in the sleep diary. PSG recording duration for scoring was 8 hours. PSG data recorded during treatment were centrally scored by a trained expert.~The subjective measure was based on participant-reported subjective assessments of sleep disturbance and were obtained from participants' responses to morning questionnaires. Questionnaires were administered during each visit during the treatment period." (NCT00770510)
Timeframe: 10 days (5 intervals of two consecutive nights)

,,,,
InterventionMinutes (Median)
Objective Total Sleep TimeSubjective Total Sleep Time
Eszopiclone 1 mg438.3390.0
Eszopiclone 2 mg452.5397.5
Eszopiclone 3 mg453.4420.0
Placebo414.0360.0
Zolpidem Tartrate 10 mg448.6411.3

[back to top]

Number of Awakenings (Objective & Subjective)

"Number of awakenings defined as the total number of spontaneous awakenings from falling asleep to final awakening was objectively determined by polysomnography and subjectively determined based on participant-reported measures following treatment.~The objective number of awakenings was based on PSG assessments. PSG recording was performed according to a manual for overnight PSG. The start time for PSG recording was individualized and scheduled within +/- 30 minutes of the participant's median bedtime as recorded in the sleep diary. PSG recording duration for scoring was 8 hours. PSG data recorded during treatment were centrally scored by a trained expert.~The subjective measure was based on participant-reported subjective assessments and were obtained from participants' responses to morning questionnaires. Questionnaires were administered during each visit during the treatment period." (NCT00770510)
Timeframe: 10 days (5 intervals of two consecutive nights)

,,,,
InterventionNumber of awakenings (Median)
Objective Number of AwakeningsSubjective Number of Awakenings
Eszopiclone 1 mg4.03.0
Eszopiclone 2 mg3.52.5
Eszopiclone 3 mg2.82.0
Placebo4.03.0
Zolpidem Tartrate 10 mg3.52.0

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events

"Incidence of adverse events was defined as: (number of participants with adverse events/ number of participants analyzed in the safety analysis set)*100.~An adverse event was defined as any unwanted or untoward disease or its symptom, sign, or abnormality in laboratory parameters in a subject who receives a study drug. An adverse event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the study drug. The investigator or subinvestigator evaluated adverse events and recorded the results in the case report form (CRF). The investigator or subinvestigator recorded all adverse events occurring after the start of study treatment in the CRF, irrespective of the causal relationship with the study drug or the study procedures. All data collected from the follow-up was recorded in CRF." (NCT00770692)
Timeframe: Up to 25 weeks (24 weeks treatment period & 1 week follow-up)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Eszopiclone 1 mg- Elderly81.5
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Elderly79.5
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Non-elderly82.1
Eszopiclone 3 mg- Non-elderly87.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)

Based on subjective symptoms, the participants recorded their WASO defined as total awakening time from falling asleep to final awakening in a sleep diary questionnaire for the week preceding the start of the study treatment (the day on which the patient was enrolled in the treatment period), as well as between the day on which the study treatment started and the Week 4 visit. For pre-treatment (screening period), the representative value was calculated from the data of the 7 days preceding enrollment in the treatment period. A median of all the data between the day of enrollment in the treatment period and the day before dose escalation judgment was presented as the data of the overall period. The change was calculated as the WASO of the overall period assessment - WASO at baseline (screening period). (NCT00770692)
Timeframe: Baseline (screening period) and 4 weeks of treatment

,,,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
BaselineOverall Period (Change From Baseline)
Eszopiclone 1 mg- Elderly61.6-30.8
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Elderly68.8-35.1
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Non-elderly53.2-32.4
Eszopiclone 3 mg- Non-elderly42.3-23.3

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Sleep Time

Based on subjective symptoms, the participants recorded their total sleep time defined as total sleeping time from bedtime to final awakening in a sleep diary questionnaire for the week preceding the start of the study treatment (the day on which the patient was enrolled in the treatment period), as well as between the day on which the study treatment started and the Week 4 visit. For pre-treatment (screening period), the representative value was calculated from the data of the 7 days preceding enrollment in the treatment period. A median of all the data between the day of enrollment in the treatment period and the day before dose escalation judgment was presented as the data of the overall period. The change was calculated as the total sleep time of the overall period assessment - total sleep time at baseline (screening period). (NCT00770692)
Timeframe: Baseline (screening period) and 4 weeks of treatment

,,,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
BaselineOverall Period (Change From Baseline)
Eszopiclone 1 mg- Elderly314.263.6
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Elderly307.974.2
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Non-elderly290.770.2
Eszopiclone 3 mg- Non-elderly308.261.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Number of Awakenings

Based on subjective symptoms, the participants recorded their number of awakenings defined as total number of spontaneous awakenings from falling asleep to final awakening in a sleep diary questionnaire for the week preceding the start of the study treatment (the day on which the patient was enrolled in the treatment period), as well as between the day on which the study treatment started and the Week 4 visit. For pre-treatment (screening period), the representative value was calculated from the data of the 7 days preceding enrollment in the treatment period. A median of all the data between the day of enrollment in the treatment period and the day before dose escalation judgment was presented as the data of the overall period. The change was calculated as the total number of awakenings of the overall period assessment - total number of awakenings at baseline (screening period). (NCT00770692)
Timeframe: Baseline (screening period) and 4 weeks of treatment

,,,
InterventionNumber of Awakenings (Mean)
BaselineOverall Period (Change From Baseline)
Eszopiclone 1 mg- Elderly1.8-0.5
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Elderly1.9-0.5
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Non-elderly1.7-0.7
Eszopiclone 3 mg- Non-elderly1.6-0.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline In Sleep Latency

Based on subjective symptoms, the participants recorded their sleep latency (the amount of time measured in minutes it takes to fall asleep) in a sleep diary questionnaire for the week preceding the start of the study treatment (the day on which the patient was enrolled in the treatment period), as well as between the day on which the study treatment started and the Week 4 visit. For pre-treatment (screening period), the representative value was calculated from the data of the 7 days preceding enrollment in the treatment period. A median of all the data between the day of enrollment in the treatment period and the day before dose escalation judgment was presented as the data of the overall period. The change was calculated as the sleep latency of the overall period assessment - sleep latency at baseline (screening period). (NCT00770692)
Timeframe: Baseline (screening period) and 4 weeks of treatment

,,,
Interventionminutes (Mean)
BaselineOverall Period (Change From Baseline)
Eszopiclone 1 mg- Elderly65.5-32.1
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Elderly70.7-37.0
Eszopiclone 2 mg- Non-elderly71.8-36.7
Eszopiclone 3 mg- Non-elderly64.0-32.8

[back to top]

Nighttime Awakenings

Participants were asked to keep a daily record. 6 week data were averaged over the 6 week period (NCT00812214)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 weeks

,
Interventionawakenings/night (Mean)
Baseline6 weeks
Eszopiclone 3mg2.41.5
Placebo2.72.2

[back to top]

Daytime Fatigue

"Participants were asked to keep a daily record.~Daytime fatigue was measured on a scale of 1=not tired to 10=extremely tired.~The average among weeks 1 and 2, weeks 3 and 4, and weeks 5 and 6 were taken, resulting in 3 averages, where the lowest average is reported as the minimum value of the full range, the middle average is reported as the median, and the highest average is reported as the maximum value of the full range" (NCT00812214)
Timeframe: Measured every two weeks (1&2, 3&4, 5&6)

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Eszopiclone 3mg4.3
Placebo4.8

[back to top]

Nighttime Awakenings

"Participants were asked to keep a daily record.~The average among weeks 1 and 2, weeks 3 and 4, and weeks 5 and 6 were taken, resulting in 3 averages, where the lowest average is reported as the minimum value of the full range, the middle average is reported as the median, and the highest average is reported as the maximum value of the full range" (NCT00812214)
Timeframe: Measured every two weeks (1&2, 3&4, 5&6)

Interventionawakenings/night (Median)
Eszopiclone 3mg1.5
Placebo2.1

[back to top]

Headache Duration

Participants were asked to keep a daily record. 6 week data were averaged over the 6 week period (NCT00812214)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 weeks

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Baseline6 weeks
Eszopiclone 3mg4.03.9
Placebo3.73.8

[back to top]

Headache Intensity

"Participants were asked to keep a daily record. 6 week data were averaged over the 6 week period~Headache intensity was measured on a scale of 1=not intense to 10=worst headache possible" (NCT00812214)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline6 weeks
Eszopiclone 3mg5.65.5
Placebo5.35.6

[back to top]

Quality of Sleep

"Participants were asked to keep a daily record. 6 week data were averaged over the 6 week period~Overall sleep quality was measured on a scale of 1=poor to 10=excellent.~Daytime alertness was measured on a scale of 1=not alert to 10=extremely alert.~Daytime fatigue was measured on a scale of 1=not tired to 10=extremely tired.~Daytime functioning was measured on a scale of 1=poor to 10=excellent." (NCT00812214)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Overall sleep quality, BaselineOverall sleep quality, 6 weeksDaytime alertness, BaselineDaytime alertness, 6 weeksDaytime fatigue, BaselineDaytime fatigue, 6 weeksDaytime functioning, BaselineDaytime functioning, 6 weeks
Eszopiclone 3mg5.16.76.16.95.24.36.57.0
Placebo4.96.26.06.65.55.06.36.9

[back to top]

Total Sleep Time

Participants were asked to record an estimated total time asleep on a daily basis. Nightly estimates were averaged over a 2 week period for baseline and 6 week period so that the total sleep time represents the average total time asleep each night. (NCT00812214)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 weeks

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Baseline6 week average
Eszoplicone 3mg5.46.3
Placebo5.56.1

[back to top]

Headache Frequency

Number of days per week in which a participant had a headache. Participants were asked to keep a daily record. 6 week data were averaged over the 6 week period (NCT00812214)
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 weeks

,
Interventiondays/week (Mean)
Baseline6 weeks
Eszopiclone 3mg2.92.5
Placebo3.12.5

[back to top]

Change in Thalamic Glutamine From Baseline to Week 1

Glutamine levels were measured by single voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the left thalamus. In order to normalize the data, the glutamine values were expressed as a ratio to levels of creatine, since creatine levels are not expected to vary significantly. (NCT00826111)
Timeframe: baseline and 1 week

Interventionratio (glutamine to creatine) (Mean)
Eszopiclone-0.6639
Placebo-0.3551

[back to top]

Change in Thalamic Glutamate From Baseline to Week 1

Glutamate levels were measured in the left thalamus using single voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In order to normalize the data, the glutamate values were expressed as a ratio to levels of creatine, since creatine levels are not expected to vary significantly. (NCT00826111)
Timeframe: baseline and 1 week

Interventionratio (glutamate to creatine) (Mean)
Eszopiclone-0.0016
Placebo-0.7715

[back to top]

Change in Anterior Cingulate Cortex GABA From Baseline to Week 1

GABA levels were measured in the anterior cingulate cortex using single voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In order to normalize the data, the GABA values were expressed as a ratio to levels of creatine, since creatine levels are not expected to vary significantly. (NCT00826111)
Timeframe: baseline and 1 week

Interventionratio (GABA to creatine) (Mean)
Eszopiclone0.0013
Placebo-0.0036

[back to top]

Change in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Glutamate From Baseline to Week 1

Glutamate levels were measured in the anterior cingulate cortex using single voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In order to normalize the data, the glutamate values were expressed as a ratio to levels of creatine, since creatine levels are not expected to vary significantly. (NCT00826111)
Timeframe: baseline and 1 week

Interventionratio (glutamate to creatine) (Mean)
Eszopiclone-0.0066
Placebo0.215

[back to top]

Change in Anterior Cingulate Cortex Glutamine From Baseline to Week 1.

Glutamine levels were measured by single voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In order to normalize the data, the glutamine values were expressed as a ratio to levels of creatine, since creatine levels are not expected to vary significantly. (NCT00826111)
Timeframe: baseline and 1 week

Interventionratio (glutamine to creatine) (Mean)
Eszopiclone0.00059
Placebo0.00908

[back to top]

Change in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Score From Baseline to Week 10

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale is a 14 item ordinal scale that assesses symptoms of anxiety with ratings from 0-4. The score range is 0 to 56, with a higher score indicating higher levels of anxiety. A score of 15 was designated as the cut-off for enrollment in the study. (NCT00826111)
Timeframe: baseline and 10 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone-11.4
Placebo-12

[back to top]

Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Score From Baseline to Week 10

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale is a 21 item scale that assesses symptoms of depression with items rated on a scale of 0-4 or 0-2. The total score range is 0 to 65. A score of 7 or lower is generally considered to be an absence of depressive symptoms. A score of 18 was considered to be the cut-off for enrollment in this study, as this indicates clinically significant depression. A higher score represents greater severity of depressive symptoms. (NCT00826111)
Timeframe: baseline and 10 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone-13.4
Placebo-20.75

[back to top]

Change in Insomnia Severity Index Score From Baseline to Week 10

The Insomnia Severity Index is a 7 item scale that assesses difficulty sleeping and effect on quality of life with item scores from 0-4. The total score range is 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating higher levels of impairment and distress. (NCT00826111)
Timeframe: baseline and 10 weeks

Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone-11.2
Placebo-9.5

[back to top]

Change in Thalamic GABA From Baseline to Week 1

GABA levels were measured in the left thalamus using single voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In order to normalize the data, the GABA values were expressed as a ratio to levels of creatine, since creatine levels are not expected to vary significantly. (NCT00826111)
Timeframe: baseline and 1 week

Interventionratio (GABA to creatine) (Mean)
Eszopiclone-0.0002
Placebo-0.0058

[back to top]

Sleep Spindle Density During Stage 2 Sleep as Measured by Polysomnography

2 baseline nights (Days 1 &2); 2 experimental nights (Days 3 &4) (NCT00833547)
Timeframe: during two nights in an inpatient Clinical Research Center

Interventionspindles per minute during Stage 2 sleep (Mean)
Eszopiclone1.76
Placebo1.07

[back to top]

Overnight Change on Finger Tapping Task

"The finger tapping task involves pressing four numerically labeled keys on a standard computer keyboard with the fingers of the left hand, repeating a five element sequence (4-1-3-2-4) as quickly and accurately as possible for 30s. During both training and test sessions, participants alternated tapping and resting for 30s for a total of 12 tapping trials. The measure was the number of correct sequences per trial. Overnight change was the percent change in correct sequences from the last three training trials to the first three test trials the following morning." (NCT00833547)
Timeframe: Train on Day 3 and Test on Day 4 of study (experimental nights)

Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Eszopiclone21
Placebo2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Subjective SL (Sleep Latency)

A Sponsor produced sleep questionnaire asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of SL over a pre-defined time period. SL is subjective time to fall asleep. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone0.5
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone0.6
Placebo0.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Subjective Number of Awakenings After Sleep Onset (NAASO).

A Sponsor produced sleep questionnaire asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of NAASO over a pre-defined time period. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionNumber of Awakenings (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone-1.1
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone-0.8
Placebo-1.0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in PSG Defined Total Sleep Time (TST)

A central scoring facility was used to derive the PSG sleep parameter of Total Sleep Time (TST) from the epochs and stages collected via the PSG recordings. The PSG parameters provided an objective assessment of the subject's sleep on a given night. Total sleep time was defined as the number of non-wake epochs from the beginning of recording to the end of recording divided by 2. If total recording time was greater than 960 epochs (480 minutes), total sleep time was calculated from the PSG truncated at 480 minutes. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone36.90
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone37.78
Placebo35.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in PSG Defined Sleep Efficiency (SE)

A central scoring facility was used to derive the PSG sleep parameter of Sleep Efficiency (SE) from the epochs and stages collected via the PSG recordings. The PSG parameters provided an objective assessment of the subject's sleep on a given night. Sleep efficiency: (total sleep time)/(total recording time) x 100. For this endpoint, total sleep time was defined as the number of non-wake epochs from the beginning of recording to the end of recording divided by 2. If total recording time was greater than 960 epochs (480 minutes), total sleep time was calculated from the PSG truncated at 480 minutes. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of SE (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone7.31
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone7.40
Placebo7.94

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in PSG Defined Number of Awakenings After Sleep Onset (NAASO).

A central scoring facility was used to derive the PSG sleep parameter of Number of Awakenings after Sleep Onset (NAASO). The PSG parameters provided an objective assessment of the subject's sleep on a given night. Number of awakenings: The number of times, after onset of persistent sleep, that there was a wake entry of at least one-minute duration. Each awakening must have been separated by an epoch of non rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep stage 2, 3/4, or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionNumber of Awakenings after sleep onse (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone-2.0
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone-1.5
Placebo-0.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS) Total Score.

The PDSS is a validated measure of excessive sleepiness specifically designed for use in school aged children. The scale allowed for measurement of sleepiness across several relatively sedentary activities and provided a means to unmask sleepiness that may not be recognized during more active situations. It consisted of 8 items that assessed the frequency of a sleep related behavior (eg, how often do you fall asleep or get drowsy during class periods; are you usually alert most of the day; how often do you think you need more sleep) using a 5-point Likert type scale (0 = never, 4 = always). All items were summed to obtain the PDSS total score. PDSS data were used for efficacy evaluation as well as for the evaluation of residual effects.The overall PDSS scores range from a low of 0 where the individual is endorsing each item at the lowest level of sleepiness to a high of 32 where the individual is endorsing each item at the highest level of sleepiness. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone-4.5
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone-4.0
Placebo-3.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Coding Copy Subtest / Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) Scaled Score.

These tests are standardized information processing tasks to assess recognition and recoding of sensory information. The subject was given 90 seconds to complete as many substitutions of symbols as possible according to a code provided on top of the sheet. The Coding Copy Subtest A was used for subjects 6-7 years of age and the Coding Copy Subtest B was used for subjects 8-16 years of age, and the DSST was used for subjects 17 years of age. The score is the number of squares filled in correctly. Individuals are measured against their own pre-treatment baseline to determine levels of impairment using the scaled score. Higher scores mean less impairment (or potentially improvement) as the number of correct substitutions generally improves as cognition improves. Scaled scores are used to account for age differences among test takers. Scaled scores range from 1 to 19, and higher scores indicate higher cognitive function. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionScore (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone2.2
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone2.1
Placebo2.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 11 in Total Sleep Time (TST) Measured by Actigraphy Monitoring in the Actigraphy Population.

A central scoring facility was used to derive the actigraphy sleep parameter of Total Sleep Time (TST). Actigraphy data were used for additional efficacy evaluation as well as for the evaluation of rebound and withdrawal effects. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 11

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone-4.72
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone1.63
Placebo-6.02

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 11 in Subjective WASO From Actigraphy Population.

A central scoring facility was used to derive the actigraphy sleep parameters Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO). Actigraphy data were used for additional efficacy evaluation as well as for the evaluation of rebound and withdrawal effects. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 11

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone0.94
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone1.02
Placebo0.99

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 11 in Subjective Sleep Latency (SL) Measured by Actigraphy Monitoring in the Actigraphy Population.

A central scoring facility was used to derive the actigraphy sleep parameter of Sleep Latency (SL). Actigraphy data were used for additional efficacy evaluation as well as for the evaluation of rebound and withdrawal effects. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 11

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone0.90
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone0.81
Placebo0.93

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double- Blind Treatment Period (Week 12) in Polysomnography (PSG) Defined Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS).

A central scoring facility was used to derive the PSG sleep parameters Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) from the epochs and stages collected via the PSG recordings. Each epoch is 30 seconds. The PSG parameters provided an objective assessment of the subject's sleep on a given night. Change from BL at Week 12 in LPS was derived from Week 12 LPS subtracted by BL LPS. Latency to persistent sleep (LPS; minutes): time from lights out to the first of 20 consecutive epochs (10 minutes) of non-wake, as determined by PSG recordings. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

Interventionminutes (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone-18.33
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone-23.45
Placebo-25.66

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Improvement (CGI)-Parent/Caregiver at Week 12

The CGI-I Parent/Caregiver was completed by the investigator based on interviews and interactions with the subject's parent or caregiver and represented their assessment of severity and improvement in the subject's symptoms since the start of the study. A 7 point scale was used for improvement with numeric values assigned to each of the responses: very much improved (1), much improved (2), minimally improved (3), no change (4), minimally worse (5), much worse (6), and very much worse (7). (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone2.3
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone2.6
Placebo2.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in CGI-Child at Week 12

The CGI - I Child was completed by the investigator based on interviews and interactions with the subject and represented the subject's assessment of improvement in his/her symptoms since the start of the study. A 7 point scale was used for improvement with numeric values assigned to each of the responses: very much improved (1), much improved (2), minimally improved (3), no change (4), minimally worse (5), much worse (6), and very much worse (7). (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone2.3
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone2.5
Placebo2.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12 in PSG Defined Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)

A central scoring facility was used to derive the PSG sleep parameters Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO) from the epochs and stages collected via the PSG recordings. Each epoch is 30 seconds. The PSG parameters provided an objective assessment of the subject's sleep on a given night. Change from BL at Week 12 in WASO was derived from Week 12 WASO subtracted by BL WASO. Wake time after sleep onset (WASO; minutes): The number of wake epochs after the onset of persistent sleep to the end of the recording, divided by 2. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone-23.35
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone-16.75
Placebo-17.30

[back to top]

Change From Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12 in Conners' ADHD Inattention Rating Scale.

The Conners' 3 -Parent Short Form was completed by the parent and provided an assessment of Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and the most common comorbid problems and disorders in children and adolescents. It is a multi-informant assessment of children and adolescents between 6 and 18 years of age that took into account home, social and school settings. The short version of the Conners' 3 -Parent Short Form was a subset of items from the full-length form, and included the Conners' 3 Content Scales of Inattention, Hyperactivity/Impulsivity, Learning Problems, Executive Functioning, Aggression, and Peer/Family Relations. The scale scores were presented as standardized age and gender based t scores. Inattention score was used for this endpoint. The lowest scale score is 40 (best) and the highest is 90 (worse)]. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone-8.8
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone-5.8
Placebo-7.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pediatric Quality-of-Life Scale (Short Form-10).

The SF 10 Health Survey for Children is a 10 item care-giver completed assessment designed to measure children's health-related quality of life. The scale asked questions about the child's physical wellness, feelings, behavior, and activities at school and with family and friends. The SF 10 Physical and Psychosocial summary measures were scored such that higher scores indicated more favorable functioning. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
PhysicalPsychosocial
Placebo4.07-0.121
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone4.402.234
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone3.071.347

[back to top]

Change in School Tardiness/Attendance Reports at Week 12 (Days)

School tardiness/attendance reports were to be collected when subject was actively enrolled in school (fall and spring semesters only; summer school, camps or other school attendance was not recorded.) The School Tardiness Report captured the number of days that the subject was tardy to school, had partial attendance at school or was completely absent from school. Data were collected for the 30-day period prior to Baseline, 6-week period prior to Week 6, 6-week period prior to Week 12. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

,,
InterventionDays (Least Squares Mean)
Number of Days TardyNumber of Days of Partial AttendanceNumber of Days Absent
Placebo-0.3-0.10.3
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone-0.40.10.0
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone-0.2-0.2-0.2

[back to top]

Change in School Tardiness/Attendance Reports at Week 12 (Hours)

School tardiness/attendance reports were to be collected when subject was actively enrolled in school (fall and spring semesters only; summer school, camps or other school attendance was not recorded.) The School Tardiness Report captured the number of days that the subject was tardy to school, had partial attendance at school or was completely absent from school. Data were collected for the 30-day period prior to Baseline, 6-week period prior to Week 6, 6-week period prior to Week 12. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionHours (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone-0.10
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone-0.12
Placebo-0.12

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Subjective Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO).

A Sponsor produced sleep questionnaire asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of WASO over a pre-defined time period. WASO is the aggregate duration of awakenings from the time subjects fall asleep until last awakening. Wake time after sleep onset (WASO; minutes): The number of wake epochs after the onset of persistent sleep to the end of the recording, divided by 2. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone0.2
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone0.3
Placebo0.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Subjective Total Sleep Time (TST).

A Sponsor produced sleep questionnaire asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of TST over a pre-defined time period. TST is subjective total sleep time. (NCT00856973)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

InterventionMinutes (Least Squares Mean)
Pooled High Dose Eszopiclone77.2
Pooled Low Dose Eszopiclone66.4
Placebo49.2

[back to top]

Overall Incidence of Adverse Events

(NCT00857220)
Timeframe: 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Subjects with at least 1 TEAEPotentially-related TEAESevere TEAESerious TEAEFatal TEAEDiscontinued study due to TEAE
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)212138104134

[back to top]

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses

The C-SSRS is a physician-completed scale to assess any suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. The C-SSRS contained questions about suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation. Subjects were placed into categories for suicidal behavior and for suicidal ideation based on their responses to various questions. Any suicidality was defined as suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. The suicidal behavior categories were determined based on the response to the questions under suicidal behavior (Completed Suicide, Actual Attempt, Interrupted Attempt, Aborted Attempt, Preparatory Acts or Behavior).The suicidal ideation categories were determined by examining the response to 5 questions under suicidal ideation (Wish to be Dead, Nonspecific Active Suicidal Thoughts, Active Suicidal Ideation with Any Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act, Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan, Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent). (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: 12 Months

InterventionSubjects (Number)
Any SuicidalityAny Suicidal BehaviorCompleted SuicideActual AttemptInterrupted AttemptAborted AttemptPreparatory Acts or BehaviorAny Suicidal IdeationWish to be DeadNon-specific Active Suicidal ThoughtsActive Suicidal Ideation without Intent to ActActive Suicidal Ideation w/ Some Intent to ActActive Suicidal Ideation w/ Specific Plan
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)4100010403001

[back to top]

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement Score as Assessed by Parent/Caregiver or Child at Month 12

A 7-point scale was used for improvement with numeric values assigned to each of the responses: very much improved (1), much improved (2), minimally improved (3), no change (4), minimally worse (5), much worse (6), and very much worse (7). (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
From ParentFrom Child
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)2.62.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Scale

The SF-10™ Health Survey for Children is a 10-item care-giver completed assessment designed to measure children's health-related quality of life. The scale asked questions about the child's physical wellness, feelings, behavior, and activities at school and with family and friends. The SF-10 physical and psychosocial summary measures were scored such that higher scores indicated more favorable functioning. The Physical Summary Score is computed by summing values for questions 1, 2a, 2b, 3 and 5 and standardizing scores by normalizing to a total possible score of 0-100 with higher scores representing more positive indications. The Psychosocial Summary Score is computed by summing questions 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and standardizing scores by normalizing to a total possible score of 0-100 with higher scores representing more positive indications. (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Physical Summary ScorePsychosocial Summary Score
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)-1.312.14

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)

The CCPT-II is a computer-based 14-minute, visual-performance task. During an administration, respondents were required to press the space bar or click the mouse whenever any letter except the target letter appears on the screen. The speed at which the letters were presented varied during the administration. There were 6 blocks, with 3 sub-blocks, each containing 20 trials (letter presentations). The interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were 1, 2, and 4 seconds with a display time of 250 milliseconds. The order in which the different ISIs were presented varied between blocks. Conners' CCPT-II provides the following measures:% Omissions,% Commissions, Hit Reaction Time, Hit Reaction Time Standard Error,Variability of Standard Error, Detectability (d'), Response Style (beta), Perseverations, Hit Reaction Time Block Change (Vigilance Measure), Hit Standard Error Block Change (Vigilance Measure), Hit Reaction Time ISI change, and Hit Standard Error ISI Change, Confidence Index. (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

Interventionpercentage of score (Mean)
Omissions % PercentileCommissions % PercentileHit RT PercentileHit RT Std Error PercentileVariability PercentileDetectability (d') PercentileResponsive Style (beta) PercentilePerseverations % PercentileHit RT Block Change PercentileHit SE Block Change PercentileHit RT ISI Change PercentileHit SE ISI Change PercentileConfidence Index
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)10.285-5.9805.9338.7478.781-3.614-3.6144.8070.213-2.9198.0708.2708.471

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)

CBCL was completed by parents or guardians who saw the child in home-like settings. It includes several competence items, open-ended items for describing the child's illnesses, disabilities, concerns about the child, best things about the child, and several items to rate behavioral, emotional, and social problems. Responses are recorded on a Likert scale: 0 = Not True, 1 = Somewhat or Sometimes True, 2 = Very True or Often True. The checklist contains 120 questions. The standardized score is computed by determining the z-score by subtracting the mean for the subject's age group and gender from the raw score and then dividing this by the standard deviation for the subject's age group and gender. Next, multiply the zscore by 15 and then add 100. For activities scale, social scale, school scale, and total competence scale, higher values indicate higher competencies. For Internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and total problems, higher values indicate more problems. (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Activities scale standardized scoreSocial scale standardized scoreSchool scale standardized scoreTotal competence standardized scoreInternalizing problems standardized scoreExternalizing problems standardized scoreTotal problems standardized score
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)1.040.940.021.020.190.290.19

[back to top]

Overall Incidence of Skin Reactions: Number of Participant Affected

(NCT00857220)
Timeframe: 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)13

[back to top]

Overall Incidence of Skin Reactions: Number of Events

(NCT00857220)
Timeframe: 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

InterventionEvents (Number)
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS)at Month 12

The PDSS total score ranges from a low of 0 where the individual is endorsing each item at the lowest level of daytime sleepiness to a high of 32 where the individual is endorsing each item at the highest level of daytime sleepiness. (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)-3.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Coding Copy Subtest A or B, or Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)at Month 12

These tests are standardized information processing tasks to assess recognition and recoding of sensory information. The subject was given 90 seconds to complete as many substitutions of symbols as possible according to a code provided on top of the sheet. The Coding Copy Subtest A was used for subjects 6 to 7 years of age, the Coding Copy Subtest B was used for subjects 8 to 16 years of age, and the DSST was used for subjects 17 years of age. The DSST consists of rows containing small blank squares, each paired with a randomly assigned numbers 1-9. Above the rows is a key that pairs each number with a symbol. The subject must fill in the blank spaces with the matching symbol that is in the key. For the Subcopy tests the subject simply copies the symbol above each empty square. Scaled scores are used to account for age differences among test takers. Scaled scores range from 1 to 19, and higher scores indicate higher cognitive function. (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

Interventionscore (Mean)
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)1.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)

The sleep questionnaire, a Sponsor produced questionnaire used in previous eszopiclone studies, asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of the subject's sleep over a predefined time period. WASO was assessed based on the responses to the sleep questionnaire. (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)-22.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Total Sleep Time (TST).

The sleep questionnaire, a Sponsor produced questionnaire used in previous eszopiclone studies, asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of the subject's sleep over a predefined time period. TST was assessed based on the responses to the sleep questionnaire. (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)45.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Sleep Latency (SL)

Sleep latency is the amount of time it takes to fall asleep after the lights have been turned off. (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

InterventionMinutes (Mean)
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)-18.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Number of Awakening After Sleep Onset (NAASO)

The sleep questionnaire, a Sponsor produced questionnaire used in previous eszopiclone studies, asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of the subject's sleep over a predefined time period. NAASO was assessed based on the responses to the sleep questionnaire. (NCT00857220)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)

InterventionNumber of Awakenings (Mean)
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)-0.8

[back to top]

Cortisol Response to the Dex/CRH Test Post-treatment (6 Weeks Oral Drug)

Cortisol reponse to the DEX/CRH test post-treatment is the same as measured and calculated at baseline =delta(CORT). (NCT00889200)
Timeframe: post drug (6 weeks oral eszopiclone)

Interventionnmol/L (Mean)
Open-label Eszopiclone108.98

[back to top]

Subjective Sleepiness and Performance

The Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS), a nine point Visual Analog Scale of alertness/sleepiness, was used to assess subjective sleepiness. The KSS is a scale from 1 to 9, from minimum to maximum sleepiness. (NCT00900159)
Timeframe: On each treatment, after an 8.5-hr daytime sleep episode following at least 3 consecutive night shifts

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone5.0
Placebo5.3

[back to top]

Objective Vigilance Task Performance

"A computer-based Flanker Task elicits responses to an incongruent pairing of stimuli measured as reaction time, in milliseconds. The Flanker task tests response inhibition, or the participants suppression of an unwanted response. A target stimulus (symbol) is flanked by non-target stimuli (symbols) that are the same as the target stimulus, opposite of the target stimulus, or neutral with respect to the target stimulus. The task is intended to assess the ability to maintain selective attention in the presence of distractors." (NCT00900159)
Timeframe: On each treatment, after an 8.5 hour daytime sleep period following at least 3 consecutive night shifts

Interventionmilliseconds (Mean)
Eszopiclone631
Placebo617

[back to top]

Sleep-dependent Memory Consolidation

A computer-based Word-pair tasks is the number of words recalled after sleep from a list of words shown prior to going to sleep. (NCT00900159)
Timeframe: On each treatment, after an 8.5 hour daytime sleep period following at least 3 consecutive night shifts

Interventionwords (Mean)
Eszopiclone20.4
Placebo21.4

[back to top]

EEG-recorded Sleep Efficiency

Polysomnographic recordings of daytime sleep were made at sleep screen (8.5hr) and during daytime sleep episodes of 8.5 hours of duration during treatment visits. Sleep efficiency is calculated based on the time the participant spent in bed and the actual time the participant slept. (NCT00900159)
Timeframe: On each treatment, during an 8.5-hr daytime sleep episode following at least 3 consecutive night shifts

Interventionpercentage of time sleeping (Mean)
Eszopiclone92.3
Placebo88.9

[back to top]

Nighttime Wakefulness Assessed by Mean Sleep Latency Across 4 Maintenance of Wakefulness Tests

Participants underwent four Maintenance of Wakefulness Tests (MWT) at 2-hour intervals during the simulated night shift starting 5 hours after wake time. MWT range from 0 to 40 minutes, where shorter times to fall asleep represent greater sleepiness (worse). MWT tests are averaged, for a mean in minutes. (NCT00900159)
Timeframe: On each treatment, after an 8.5 hour daytime sleep period following at least 3 consecutive night shifts

Interventionminutes (Mean)
Eszopiclone11.0
Placebo14.75

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter (Bioequivalence): Area Under the Plasma Concentration- Time Curve From Time 0 to Time 24 Hours (AUC[0-24])

Pharmacokinetic parameter: Area under the plasma concentration- time curve from time 0 (administration of the drug) to time 24 hours was measured in order to confirm bioequivalence. AUC was measured in nanogram hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL). Blood sampling was calculated immediately before administration of the study drug and 24 hours after administration of the study drug (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12, 24 hours post-dose). (NCT01055834)
Timeframe: immediately before administration & 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
Eszopiclone One 3 mg Tablet212.59
Eszopiclone Three 1 mg Tablets210.03

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter (Food Effect): Area Under the Plasma Concentration- Time Curve From Time 0 to Time 24 Hours (AUC[0-24])

Pharmacokinetic parameter: Area under the plasma concentration- time curve from time 0 (administration of the drug) to time 24 hours was measured in order to investigate the effect of food. AUC was measured in nanogram hours per milliliter (ng*h/mL) and was measured under fasted and fed conditions. Blood sampling was calculated immediately before administration of the study drug and 24 hours after administration of the study drug (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12, 24 hours post-dose). (NCT01055834)
Timeframe: immediately before administration & 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng*hr/mL (Mean)
Fasted AUC [0-24]Fed AUC [0-24]
Eszopiclone One 3 mg Tablet199.17194.53

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter (Bioequivalence): Maximal Drug Concentration (Cmax)

Pharmacokinetic parameter: maximal drug concentration (Cmax) was measured in order to confirm bioequivalence. Cmax was measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). Blood sampling was calculated immediately before administration of the study drug and 24 hours after administration of the study drug (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12, 24 hours post-dose). (NCT01055834)
Timeframe: immediately before administration & 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Eszopiclone One 3 mg Tablet40.80
Eszopiclone Three 1 mg Tablets40.21

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetic Parameter (Food Effect): Maximal Drug Concentration (Cmax)

Pharmacokinetic parameter: maximal drug concentration (Cmax) was measured in order to investigate the effect of food. Cmax was measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) and was measured under fasted and fed conditions. Blood sampling was calculated immediately before administration of the study drug and 24 hours after administration of the study drug (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12, 24 hours post-dose). (NCT01055834)
Timeframe: immediately before administration & 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 12, 24 hours post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Fasted CmaxFed Cmax
Eszopiclone One 3 mg Tablet37.5926.56

[back to top]

Apnea Hypopnea Index

number of respiratory events per hour of sleep Respiratory events last for at least 10 seconds and are associated with a decrease in blood oxygenation or a cortical arosual from sleep. AHI values are typically categorized as 5-15/hr = mild; 15-30/hr = moderate; and > 30/h = severe (NCT01102270)
Timeframe: 8 hour In-Laboratory Polysomnogram (PSG)

Interventionevents per hour of sleep (Mean)
Eszopiclone24
Sugar Pill31

[back to top]

Arousal Threshold

quantified using an epiglottic pressure transducer in CmH2O (NCT01102270)
Timeframe: 8 hour In-Laboratory Polysomnogram (PSG)

InterventioncmH2O (Median)
Eszopiclone-18
Sugar Pill-14

[back to top]

Nadir Overnight Oxygen Saturation

Nadir overnight oxygen saturation (%) (NCT01102270)
Timeframe: 8 hour In-Laboratory Polysomnogram (PSG)

Intervention% oxygen saturation (Mean)
Eszopiclone80
Sugar Pill80

[back to top]

Sleep Duration

total sleep duration (NCT01102270)
Timeframe: 8 hour In-Laboratory Polysomnogram (PSG)

Interventionhours of sleep (Mean)
Eszopiclone6.8
Sugar Pill5.4

[back to top]

Changes in Emotional Bias Memory Encoding Between Baseline and Week 12

Changes in Emotional Bias Memory Encoding by measuring mean hits minus the false alarms at baseline and at week 12. Subjects perform an encoding session on the 1st day utilizing 147 picture slides, thirty six pictures with negative valence, 36 with neutral valence and additional 75 pictures randomly intermixed. Higher false alarms are associated with lower emotional bias memory encoding. (NCT01605253)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone93
Placebo102

[back to top]

Cytokine Inflammatory Marker on Interleukin-2

Differences between baseline and week 12 on Interleukin-2 levels between treatment arms (eszopiclone versus placebo). (NCT01605253)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionIU (Mean)
Eszopiclone1.67
Placebo-0.07

[back to top]

Total Score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Addendum (PSQI)

This standard daily sleep diary addresses timing of sleep, ability to fall and stay asleep, dreams, nightmares, and factors which can affect sleep (e.g. caffeine). It requires a summary of the subscales: Duration of sleep + Sleep Disturbance + Sleep Latency + Days of dysfunction due to sleepiness + Sleep efficiency + Overall Sleep Quality + Needing medication to sleep. All subscales are measured from 0 to 3 (Minimum Score = 0 better; Maximum Score = 3 worse). The Minimum TOTAL Score is 0 (better) and Maximum TOTAL Score is 21 (worse). (NCT01605253)
Timeframe: Changes in total score between Baseline and Week 12 (range of 0 to 21 worse)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone-4.13
Placebo-3.33

[back to top]

Cytokine Inflammatory Markers

Differences between baseline and week 12 on Interferon-Gamma, Interleukin-βeta, Interleukin-6, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha levels between treatment arms (eszopiclone versus placebo). (NCT01605253)
Timeframe: Week 12

,
Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
Interferon-GAMMA pg/mLInterleukin-βeta pg/mLInterleukin-6 pg/mLTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha pg/mL
Eszopiclone3.62-0.101.2967.27
Placebo-1.550.30-0.0864.80

[back to top]

Change in Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Between Baseline and Week 12

"The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is a highly detailed measure of the presence and severity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-IV) Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) criteria. The severity score was calculated by adding up the frequency score (scale 0 = none of the time to 4 = most or all of the time) and an intensity score (scale 0 = none to 4 = extreme), which can then be summed for all 17 symptom questions and/or for the three symptom clusters. Scores range from 0 to 136, where greater than or equal to 80 represents extreme PTSD symptomatology." (NCT01605253)
Timeframe: Between Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Eszopiclone-23
Placebo-20

[back to top]

Motor Procedural Memory Performance

Overnight performance improvement on the finger tapping motor sequence task (MST).The MST involves pressing four numerically labeled keys on a standard keyboard with the fingers of the left hand, repeating a 5 digit sequence as quickly and accurately as possible for 12 trials at 30 seconds each separated by 30 sec rest periods. Different sequences were employed for the Placebo and Drug visits in a counter-balanced order. MST performance is measured as the number of correctly typed sequences in each trial. The primary outcome measure is overnight improvement calculated as the percent increase in average of correct sequences from the last three training trials to the average of first three test trials. Since the outcome measure is calculated as percent improvement from training to test for each participant, there is no highest or lowest possible score. (NCT01641900)
Timeframe: Experimental Night (Night 2)

,
Interventionpercentage of improvement on MST perform (Mean)
Placebo (Placebo capsule)Drug (3mg eszopiclone)
Group: Healthy Controls15.116.69
Group: Schizophrenia13.359.69

[back to top]

Sleep Spindle Density

This measure is averaged for Baseline and Experimental nights. Sleep spindle density (number/minute) for non-Rapid Eye Movement Stage 2 sleep (N2) detected at channel Cz based on polysomnographic recordings. (NCT01641900)
Timeframe: Spindles will be averaged for the Baseline (Night 1) and Experimental Nights (Night 2)

,
InterventionSleep spindle density (number/minutes) (Mean)
Placebo (placebo capsule)Drug (3mg eszopiclone)
Group: Healthy Controls2.132.44
Group: Schizophrenia2.022.25

[back to top]