Page last updated: 2024-11-04

timolol

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth

Description

(S)-timolol (anhydrous) : The (S)-(-) (more active) enantiomer of timolol. A beta-adrenergic antagonist, both the hemihydrate and the maleate salt are used in the mangement of glaucoma, hypertension, angina pectoris and myocardial infarction, and for the prevention of migraine. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID33624
CHEMBL ID499
CHEBI ID9599
SCHEMBL ID4912
MeSH IDM0021546

Synonyms (90)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0073
AB00513729-17
BRD-K08806317-050-03-6
gtpl565
PRESTWICK2_000948
BPBIO1_001008
(2s)-1-[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]-3-[(4-morpholin-4-yl-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy]propan-2-ol
hsdb 6533
timolol gfs
timoptic-xe
timopic
2-propanol, 1-((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)-3-((4-(4-morpholinyl)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy)-, (s)-
einecs 248-032-6
2-propanol, 1-((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)-3-((4-(4-morpholinyl)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy)-, (2s)-
NCGC00016038-01
cas-26921-17-5
lopac-t-6394
NCGC00016798-01
tocris-0649
NCGC00022033-02
BSPBIO_000916
PRESTWICK3_000948
LOPAC0_001189
AB00513729
C07141
timolol ,
26839-75-8
(2s)-1-(tert-butylamino)-3-[(4-morpholin-4-yl-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy]propan-2-ol
(s)-1-tert-butylamino-3-(4-morpholin-4-yl-[1,2,5]thiadiazol-3-yloxy)-propan-2-ol
1-(tert-butylamino)-3-[4-(1,4-oxazinan-4-yl)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yloxy]-(2s)-propan-2-ol
(s)-1-(tert-butylamino)-3-((4-morpholino-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy)propan-2-ol
(-)-3-morpholino-4-(3-tert-butylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)-1,2,5-thiadiazole
s-(-)-3-(3-tert-butylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)-4-morpholino-1,2,5-thiadiazole
(2s)-1-((1,1-dimethylethyl)amino)-3-((4-(4-morpholinyl)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy)-2-propanol
(s)-timolol (anhydrous)
CHEBI:9599 ,
(s)-1-(1,1-(dimethylethyl)amino)-3-((4-(4-morpholinyl)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy)-2-propanol
(s)-timolol
DB00373
(s)-1-(tert-butylamino)-3-[(4-morpholin-4-yl-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy]propan-2-ol
timolol anhydrous
NCGC00022033-05
PRESTWICK1_000948
PRESTWICK0_000948
SPBIO_003075
OPREA1_640981
NCGC00022033-04
NCGC00016038-02
HMS2089I11
NCGC00016798-07
CHEMBL499 ,
D08600
timolol (tn)
timolol (inn)
bdbm50292219
NCGC00016798-06
HMS3259C20
(2s)-3-[(tert-butyl)amino]-1-(4-morpholin-4-yl(1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy)propa n-2-ol
tox21_110614
dtxcid203674
dtxsid4023674 ,
cas-26839-75-8
AKOS015969764
NCGC00016798-03
NCGC00016798-09
NCGC00016798-02
NCGC00016798-08
NCGC00016798-05
5jky92s7br ,
unii-5jky92s7br
timololum
timolol [usan:inn]
timolol [mi]
timolol [who-dd]
timolol [hsdb]
timolol [inn]
(s)-1-(tert-butylamino)-3-((4-morpholino-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)oxy)-2-propanol
2-propanol, 1-[(1,1-dimethylethyl)amino]-3-[[4-(4-morpholinyl)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl]oxy]-, (2s)-
NC00592
SCHEMBL4912
tox21_110614_1
NCGC00016798-11
W-107148
Q413994
BRD-K08806317-103-02-5
NCGC00016798-20
EN300-17982937
(2s)-1-(tert-butylamino)-3-{[4-(morpholin-4-yl)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl]oxy}propan-2-ol
HY-17494
CS-0009238

Research Excerpts

Toxicity

Timolol maleate, a nonselective beta blocker, has been associated with adverse reactions when administered topically or systemically. Double-masked studies will be necessary to clarify the relationship of these adverse effects to the use of timolol.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"5% appeared to be an effective and safe ocular hypotensive agent."( Timolol maleate: efficacy and safety.
Becker, B; Kass, MA; Yablonski, ME; Zimmerman, TJ, 1979
)
0.26
" The drug was well tolerated and without serious adverse effects."( [Efficacy and safety of long-term maintenance treatment with timolol ophthalmic solution in chronic open-angle glaucoma (author's transl)].
Katz, IM, 1979
)
0.26
" Double-masked studies will be necessary to clarify the relationship of these adverse effects to the use of timolol."( Adverse effects experienced by patients taking timolol.
Hetherington, J; Hoskins, HD; McMahon, CD; Shaffer, RN, 1979
)
0.26
" In this longest chronic administration study to date, MK-927 did not cause adverse ocular or systemic side effects."( Six week safety study of 2% MK-927 administered twice daily to ocular hypertensive volunteers.
Camras, CB; Deasy, D; Framm, L; Lippa, EA; Lustgarten, J; Payne, JE; Podos, SM; Serle, JB, 1992
)
0.28
"5% timolol administered once daily are effective and safe in lowering IOP in most patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma."( Efficacy and safety of once-daily levobunolol for glaucoma therapy.
Almog, Y; Friedland, BR; Kelley, EP; Lazar, M; LeBlanc, RP; Lee, PF; Mann, C; Novack, GD; Orr, A; Rakofsky, SI, 1989
)
0.28
" Adverse experiences requiring cessation of therapy occurred in an additional 10% of patients."( Levobunolol. A four-year study of efficacy and safety in glaucoma treatment. The Levobunolol Study Group.
, 1989
)
0.28
" Levobunolol and timolol were similarly effective and safe in reducing intraocular pressure in patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma and those with ocular hypertension."( [Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of levobunolol and timolol in ocular hypertension and chronic open-angle glaucoma].
Batoosingh, AL; Freyler, H; Menapace, R; Mordaunt, J; Novack, GD; Skorpik, C, 1988
)
0.27
" Data submitted to the National Registry of Drug-Induced Ocular Side Effects appear to indicate similar adverse reactions secondary to topical ophthalmic timolol."( Psychiatric side effects from topical ocular timolol, a beta-adrenergic blocker.
Fraunfelder, FT; Meyer, SM; Shore, JH, 1987
)
0.27
" The ocular drugs causing serious adverse ocular or systemic side effects in children include glaucoma medications, corticosteroids, phenylephrine, and the anticholinergic cycloplegics."( How safe are ocular drugs in pediatrics?
Palmer, EA, 1986
)
0.27
" The adverse effects of timolol maleate during 6 months of treatment were of transient nature and generally mild."( A study of the efficacy of two commercial preparations of timolol maleate with special reference to side effects.
Palkama, A; Stjernschantz, J; Uusitalo, RJ, 1985
)
0.27
"A review of current literary sources disclosed a host of adverse reactions which may potentially be associated with the topical administration of timolol maleate."( Potential systemic and ocular side effects associated with topical administration of timolol maleate.
Trawick, AB, 1985
)
0.27
"Timolol maleate, a nonselective beta blocker, has been associated with adverse reactions when administered topically or systemically."( Side effects of timolol.
Baumann, JD; Hetherington, J; Zimmerman, TJ, 1983
)
0.27
" Careful selection of patients will reduce the frequency of adverse effects due to beta-receptor inhibition."( Pharmacokinetics, mechanisms of action, indications, and adverse effects of timolol maleate, a nonselective beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agent.
Dunn, FG; Frohlich, ED,
)
0.13
"A double-blind crossover study in seven patients with glaucoma and obstructive lung disease revealed a considerable and significant bronchoconstrictive side effect on topically administered timolol maleat."( [Bronchoconstrictive side effects of timolol eye drops in patients with obstructive lung disease].
Bachofen, H; Flammer, J; Landolt, M; Vonwil, A, 1981
)
0.26
" Most adverse effects occurred with levels much higher than would be expected after the topical use of timolol to control glaucoma."( Potential side effects of timolol therapy in the treatment of glaucoma.
Golob, DS; Leader, BJ; Zimmerman, TJ, 1981
)
0.26
" Adverse event were reported by 70 out of 89 patients by the end of 2 weeks, but were severe enough only in 11 for the treatment to be discontinued."( Efficacy and safety of timolol/pilocarpine combination drops in glaucoma patients.
Palkama, A; Uusitalo, RJ, 1994
)
0.29
"While adverse effects are uncommon in patients who are otherwise fit and well, doctors should be aware of the implications of the systemic effects of these drugs, particularly the non-selective types, and particularly in the elderly."( The safety of topical beta-blockers in glaucoma treatment.
Goldberg, I, 1996
)
0.29
" The most significant ocular side effect was increased pigmentation of the iris observed in five and suspected in seven more latanoprost-treated eyes."( Effects on intraocular pressure and side effects of 0.005% latanoprost applied once daily, evening or morning. A comparison with timolol. Scandinavian Latanoprost Study Group.
Alm, A; Stjernschantz, J, 1995
)
0.29
"The review is based on a survey of studies on adverse reactions related to topical administration of beta-blockers for glaucoma."( [Adverse effects of local use of beta-blockaders in glaucoma. A literature review and a survey of reports to the adverse drug reaction authority 1986-95].
Høvding, G; Nygaard, HA, 1997
)
0.3
" It was concluded that switching from timolol maleate to timolol hemihydrate is safe and effective in maintaining control of the intraocular pressure."( The safety and efficacy of switching timolol maleate 0.5% solution to timolol hemihydrate 0.5% solution given twice daily.
Cate, EA; Mundorf, TK; Otero, DW; Sine, CS; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 1998
)
0.3
" Burning and/or stinging on instillation were the only adverse experiences that affected significantly more of the patients receiving 2% dorzolamide twice or three times daily than those receiving placebo."( The efficacy and safety of dorzolamide as adjunctive therapy to timolol maleate gellan solution in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Additivity Study Group.
Adamsons, I; Clineschmidt, C; Laibovitz, R; Polis, A; Shedden, A; Taylor, J, 1998
)
0.3
" Monotherapy with xalathane is safe sufficiently effective, and comparable to combined therapy with timolol and pilocarpine."( [Xalathane: comparative assessment of efficacy and safety in hypotensive therapy of glaucoma].
Erichev, VP; Iakubova, LV,
)
0.13
" The treatment groups were generally comparable in terms of adverse events, symptoms, ocular signs, visual acuity, visual fields, physical examination, and laboratory measures."( The efficacy and safety of the dorzolamide-timolol combination versus the concomitant administration of its components. Dorzolamide-Timolol Study Group.
Adamsons, I; DuBiner, H; Snyder, E; Strohmaier, K, 1998
)
0.3
" The incidence of the most common drug-related adverse experiences in the first year was compared with that in the second year using McNemar's test."( Two-year safety study of dorzolamide as monotherapy and with timolol and pilocarpine. Dorzolamide Safety Study Group.
Adamsons, IA; Boyle, JE; Ostrov, CS; Polis, A, 1998
)
0.3
" Of the patients who received dorzolamide as monotherapy, drug-related adverse events occurred more frequently during the first year (29."( Two-year safety study of dorzolamide as monotherapy and with timolol and pilocarpine. Dorzolamide Safety Study Group.
Adamsons, IA; Boyle, JE; Ostrov, CS; Polis, A, 1998
)
0.3
" Drug-related adverse events were less frequent during the second year of monotherapy than during the first year."( Two-year safety study of dorzolamide as monotherapy and with timolol and pilocarpine. Dorzolamide Safety Study Group.
Adamsons, IA; Boyle, JE; Ostrov, CS; Polis, A, 1998
)
0.3
" Both combination and concomitant therapy were well tolerated and few patients discontinued due to adverse effects."( Comparison of the safety and efficacy of the fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol and the concomitant administration of dorzolamide and timolol: a clinical equivalence study. International Clinical Equivalence Study Group.
Adamsons, I; Hutzelmann, J; Owens, S; Shedden, A; Vargas, E, 1998
)
0.3
" The treatment groups were generally comparable in terms of adverse events, symptoms, ocular signs, visual acuity, visual fields, physical examination, and laboratory measures."( The efficacy and safety of the dorzolamide-timolol combination versus the concomitant administration of its components.
Adamsons, I; DuBiner, H; Snyder, E; Strohmaier, K, 1999
)
0.3
" No differences were observed between treatments in visual acuity, anterior segment findings, or adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of timolol solution once daily vs timolol gel added to latanoprost.
Day, DG; Dubiner, HB; Holmes, KT; Sharpe, ED; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
" in vitro toxic effects of antiglaucoma drugs could, in part, explain some ocular surface disorders in long-term treated patients."( Toxicity of preserved and unpreserved antiglaucoma topical drugs in an in vitro model of conjunctival cells.
Baudouin, C; Brignole, F; De Saint Jean, M; Debbasch, C; Rat, P; Warnet, JM, 2000
)
0.31
" One hundred forty-four patients were discontinued from the study after randomization with the most common reasons being the occurrence of an adverse event (46), inadequate intraocular pressure control (23), patient decision unrelated to study medication (11), lost to follow-up (16), and noncompliance (9)."( The long-term safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1.0% (azopt) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The Brinzolamide Long-Term Therapy Study Group.
March, WF; Ochsner, KI, 2000
)
0.31
" Brinzolamide was safe and well tolerated by patients, with minimal ocular discomfort."( The long-term safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1.0% (azopt) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The Brinzolamide Long-Term Therapy Study Group.
March, WF; Ochsner, KI, 2000
)
0.31
" Both drug regimens appeared to be safe and were well tolerated."( Ongoing clinical assessment of the safety profile and efficacy of brimonidine compared with timolol: year-three results. Brimonidine Study Group II.
David, R; Melamed, S, 2000
)
0.31
" In vitro toxic effects of antiglaucoma drugs could, in part, explain some ocular surface disorders in long-term treated patients."( [Toxicity of preserved and unpreserved beta-blocker eyedrops in an in vitro model of human conjunctival cells].
Baudouin, C; Brignole, F; de Saint Jean, M; Debbasch, C; Rat, P; Warnet, JM, 2000
)
0.31
" Study subjects within medication treatment groups were classified as to their use or nonuse of concurrent systemic beta-blockers, and mean intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, adverse events, heart rate, and blood pressure were compared."( Effects of systemic beta-blocker therapy on the efficacy and safety of topical brimonidine and timolol. Brimonidine Study Groups 1 and 2.
Schuman, JS, 2000
)
0.31
" Adverse events and mean changes in heart rate and blood pressure from baseline were the primary safety variables."( Effects of systemic beta-blocker therapy on the efficacy and safety of topical brimonidine and timolol. Brimonidine Study Groups 1 and 2.
Schuman, JS, 2000
)
0.31
" The majority of adverse events during both treatments were judged as mild."( Efficacy and side effects of latanoprost monotherapy compared to adding dorzolamide to timolol in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension--a three-month randomised study. Spanish Latanoprost Study Group.
García Sanchez, J,
)
0.13
" Safety parameters included adverse events, hyperemia grading, laser flare meter analysis, heart rate, and blood pressure."( Comparison of the ocular hypotensive lipid AGN 192024 with timolol: dosing, efficacy, and safety evaluation of a novel compound for glaucoma management.
Batoosingh, A; Cheetham, J; David, R; Felix, C; Laibovitz, RA; Rosenthal, A; VanDenburgh, AM, 2001
)
0.31
" All treatment regimens were safe and well tolerated, with no clinically significant effects on heart rate or blood pressure and no between-group differences in the incidence of adverse events."( Comparison of the ocular hypotensive lipid AGN 192024 with timolol: dosing, efficacy, and safety evaluation of a novel compound for glaucoma management.
Batoosingh, A; Cheetham, J; David, R; Felix, C; Laibovitz, RA; Rosenthal, A; VanDenburgh, AM, 2001
)
0.31
" AGN 192024 was safe and well tolerated, and it provided superior ocular hypotensive efficacy and diurnal IOP control compared with timolol in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma."( Comparison of the ocular hypotensive lipid AGN 192024 with timolol: dosing, efficacy, and safety evaluation of a novel compound for glaucoma management.
Batoosingh, A; Cheetham, J; David, R; Felix, C; Laibovitz, RA; Rosenthal, A; VanDenburgh, AM, 2001
)
0.31
" The side effect profile of unoprostone appears to be comparable to other established IOP-lowering agents."( A double-masked randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of unoprostone with timolol and betaxolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma including pseudoexfoliation glaucoma or ocular hypertension. 6 month data.
Kapik, B; Mertz, B; Nordmann, JP; Schwenninger, C; Shams, N; Yannoulis, NC, 2002
)
0.31
"From this preliminary study, immediate paracentesis seems to be safe and effective in controlling the intraocular pressure and eliminating symptoms in acute PACG."( Efficacy and safety of immediate anterior chamber paracentesis in the treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma: a pilot study.
Chua, JK; Lai, JS; Lam, DS; Tham, CC, 2002
)
0.31
"25% drops in twice daily dosage and does not result in any significant ocular and systemic adverse effects."( A prospective, long-term, randomized study of the efficacy and safety of the drug combination pilocarpine 1% with clonidine 0.06% or clonidine 0.125% versus timolol 0.25%.
Agarwal, H; Rajashekhar, YL; Sihota, R; Venkatesh, P, 2002
)
0.31
" Both treatments were well tolerated with no statistically significant difference between the groups in the occurrence of ocular or systemic adverse events."( Timolol 0.1% gel (Nyogel 0.1% once daily versus conventional timolol 0.5% solution twice daily: a comparison of efficacy and safety.
Elena, PP; Morel-Mandrino, P; Polzer, H; Rouland, JF; Sunder Raj, P,
)
0.13
" Most adverse effects associated with IOP-lowering medications are mild and ocular in nature; however, several of them are associated with systemic risks as well as serious ocular effects, especially following chronic use."( Short- and long-term safety of glaucoma drugs.
Schuman, JS, 2002
)
0.31
" Demographic data, reduction of IOP, safety and adverse events were obtained and analyzed."( The efficacy and safety of brimonidine 0.2% compared with timolol 0.5% in glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial on Taiwanese patients.
Chen, MJ; Chou, JC; Hsu, WM; Liu, JH, 2003
)
0.32
"0% patients in timolol group reported mild adverse events."( The efficacy and safety of brimonidine 0.2% compared with timolol 0.5% in glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial on Taiwanese patients.
Chen, MJ; Chou, JC; Hsu, WM; Liu, JH, 2003
)
0.32
" It has a safe systemic profile with minimum effect on the heart."( The efficacy and safety of brimonidine 0.2% compared with timolol 0.5% in glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial on Taiwanese patients.
Chen, MJ; Chou, JC; Hsu, WM; Liu, JH, 2003
)
0.32
" Safety evaluation was carried out, and number of adverse events in each treatment group did not differ substantially."( A six-week, parallel, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of the 0.5% timolol/2.0% MK-507 combination b.i.d. to the concomitant administration of 0.5% timolol b.i.d. and 2.0% MK-507 b.i.d.
Chen, YF; Hung, PT; Yang, CH, 2003
)
0.32
" Adverse events were recorded at each visit."( Efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations latanoprost/timolol versus dorzolamide/timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
Feldman, RM; Sheu, WP; Shin, DH, 2004
)
0.32
" The study medications were generally well tolerated and no serious adverse reactions occurred during the 6-week study period."( Ocular hypotensive effect and safety of brinzolamide ophthalmic solution in open angle glaucoma patients.
Chen, YF; Huang, JY; Hung, PT; Shieh, JW; Wang, TH, 2004
)
0.32
" The most common reason to discontinue therapy was lack of efficacy (n = 70, 4%) and adverse event (n = 17, 1%)."( Short term efficacy and safety in glaucoma patients changed to the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination from monotherapies and adjunctive therapies.
Beausencourt, E; Hamacher, T; Jütte, M; Lorger, C; Maier, H; Neff, HM; Schinzel, M; Schlaffer, G; Scholz, R; Schölzel-Klatt, A; Stewart, WC, 2004
)
0.32
" Adverse events were recorded at each visit."( Concomitant administration of travoprost and brinzolamide versus fixed latanoprost/timolol combined therapy: three-month comparison of efficacy and safety.
Castillo, A; Fernandez-Vidal, A; Garcia-Feijoo, J; Garcia-Sanchez, J; Martinez-de-la-Casa, JM; Mendez-Hernandez, C, 2004
)
0.32
" The most common adverse event with LTFC was conjunctival hyperemia, which occurred in patients not previously treated with latanoprost therapy (N=16, 10%)."( Intraocular pressure and safety in glaucoma patients switching to latanoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination from mono- and adjunctive therapies.
Bányai, L; Blask, KD; Konstas, AG; Kozobolis, VP; Maloutas, S; Stewart, WC; Teus, MA; Trüb, PR; Tsironi, S; Väth, J, 2004
)
0.32
" The adverse event profile for Trav/Tim was comparable to Trav or Tim alone."( The safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution.
Barnebey, HS; Bergamini, MV; Flowers, BE; Landry, TA; Mallick, S; Orengo-Nania, S; Samples, J, 2005
)
0.33
" The clinical results that Trav/Tim was safe and well tolerated with an incidence of adverse events was comparable to the results of Trav or Tim alone."( The safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution.
Barnebey, HS; Bergamini, MV; Flowers, BE; Landry, TA; Mallick, S; Orengo-Nania, S; Samples, J, 2005
)
0.33
" The most frequent ocular adverse event was hyperemia that occurred in 14."( Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution once daily for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bergamini, MV; Henry, JC; Katz, GJ; Landry, TA; Lewis, RA; Mallick, S; Robertson, SM; Schuman, JS; Sullivan, EK; Wells, DT, 2005
)
0.33
" The most important adverse events for the prostaglandin derivatives were conjunctival hyperemia, eyelashes pigmentation and growth, iris pigmentation."( Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of latanoprost, travoprost and the fixed combination timolol-dorzolamide; a prospective, randomized, masked, cross-over design study.
Antohi, I; Chiseliţă, D; Danielescu, C; Medvichi, R, 2005
)
0.33
"To assess in vivo the corneal epithelial damage caused by a topical toxic medication using a 60-MHz ultrasound device."( [In vivo assessment of corneal epithelial toxicity of timolol with benzalkonium chloride using very-high-frequency ultrasound imaging].
Arbeille, B; Denoyer, A; Fetissof, F; Ossant, F; Patat, F; Pisella, PJ, 2006
)
0.33
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" Both volunteered and elicited reports of adverse events were collected; all patients who were randomized and received > or =1 dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis."( A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Cunliffe, IA; Franks, WA; Renard, JP; Rojanapongpun, P, 2006
)
0.33
" Adverse events related to therapy were mild in nature, and there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups."( A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Cunliffe, IA; Franks, WA; Renard, JP; Rojanapongpun, P, 2006
)
0.33
" There was no significant difference for any adverse event between groups (p>0."( The efficacy and safety of timolol maleate versus brinzolamide each given twice daily added to travoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma.
Berta, A; Chiselita, D; Cvenkel, B; Holló, G; Izgi, B; Liehneova, I; Petkova, N; Stewart, WC; Szaflik, J; Turacli, E,
)
0.13
" Treatment-related adverse events were mild in both groups."( A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Andrew, R; Danesh-Meyer, H; Kozobolis, V; Melamed, S; Topouzis, F; Wells, AP; Wells, D; Wieland, H,
)
0.13
"5% fixed combination ophthalmic solution is an effective treatment for reducing IOP and it is safe and well-tolerated in patients with OAG or OH."( A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Andrew, R; Danesh-Meyer, H; Kozobolis, V; Melamed, S; Topouzis, F; Wells, AP; Wells, D; Wieland, H,
)
0.13
"Cataract surgery with PPCCC was safe in terms of the postoperative IOP course."( Intraocular pressure rise after primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis with a fixed dorzolamide-timolol combination: randomized safety study with intraindividual comparison using an angulated and a nonangulated intraocular lens.
Buehl, W; Georgopoulos, M; Heinzl, H; Menapace, R; Rainer, G; Wirtitsch, MG, 2007
)
0.34
" There were 116 predominantly mild, nonserious adverse events attributed to the study drugs, reported by 86 (24."( Effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide-timolol alone or combined with latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bastien, NR; Koulis, T; Lesk, MR; Sampalis, F; Sampalis, JS, 2008
)
0.35
"In patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and elevated IOP while on monotherapy with latanoprost, switching to dorzolamide-timolol or combining dorzolamide-timolol with latanoprost are effective and safe treatment options for reducing IOP and achieving therapeutic response."( Effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide-timolol alone or combined with latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bastien, NR; Koulis, T; Lesk, MR; Sampalis, F; Sampalis, JS, 2008
)
0.35
" As systemic adverse events, there was one instance of malar flushing after brinzolamide addition and episodes of chest discomfort after timolol addition in 1 patient."( Comparison of ocular hypotensive effect and safety of brinzolamide and timolol added to latanoprost.
Ito, K; Matsunaga, K; Miura, K; Okawa, C; Sugimoto, K; Uji, Y,
)
0.13
"VHF ultrasound imaging allowed quantitative measurement of corneal epithelium thickness and qualitative imaging of toxic epithelial damage."( Very-high-frequency ultrasound corneal imaging as a new tool for early diagnosis of ocular surface toxicity in rabbits treated with a preserved glaucoma drug.
Arbeille, B; Denoyer, A; Fetissof, F; Ossant, F; Patat, F; Pisella, PJ; Pourcelot, L, 2008
)
0.35
" There was no statistical difference for any individual adverse event between treatments (p>0."( Comparison of daytime efficacy and safety of dorzolamide/timolol maleate fixed combination versus latanoprost.
Ahmad, A; Mulaney, J; Sonty, S; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC,
)
0.13
" Safety measures included adverse events, biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, visual acuity and visual field."( Long-term efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for intraocular pressure lowering in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: year 4.
Batoosingh, AL; Cohen, JS; Gross, RL; Liu, CC; Safyan, E; Williams, RD, 2008
)
0.35
" No safety concerns developed during long-term bimatoprost treatment; two patients in the timolol treatment group discontinued after month 36 because of adverse events."( Long-term efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for intraocular pressure lowering in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: year 4.
Batoosingh, AL; Cohen, JS; Gross, RL; Liu, CC; Safyan, E; Williams, RD, 2008
)
0.35
"We review available evidence regarding the efficacy and side effect profile of brimonidine as well as its role in glaucoma management."( Efficacy, safety, and current applications of brimonidine.
Batiste, C; Fudemberg, SJ; Katz, LJ, 2008
)
0.35
"Latanoprost is safe and equally effective to a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol in the treatment of uveitic glaucoma."( Efficacy and safety of latanoprost in eyes with uveitic glaucoma.
Chalkidou, S; Georgopoulos, G; Halkiadakis, I; Kostakou, A; Markomichelakis, NN; Papakonstantinou, D, 2009
)
0.35
" Tolerability was measured using a 4-step scale (excellent, good, moderate, poor) and all adverse events were recorded."( Efficacy, tolerability and safety of the fixed combination of bimatoprost 0.03% and timolol 0.5% in a broad patient population: multicenter, open-label observational study.
Buchholz, P; Feuerhake, C; Kimmich, F, 2009
)
0.35
" Few adverse events occurred during the treatment period."( Efficacy, tolerability and safety of the fixed combination of bimatoprost 0.03% and timolol 0.5% in a broad patient population: multicenter, open-label observational study.
Buchholz, P; Feuerhake, C; Kimmich, F, 2009
)
0.35
"5% was effective, well tolerated, and safe in a broad patient population."( Efficacy, tolerability and safety of the fixed combination of bimatoprost 0.03% and timolol 0.5% in a broad patient population: multicenter, open-label observational study.
Buchholz, P; Feuerhake, C; Kimmich, F, 2009
)
0.35
" Adverse events were recorded at each visit."( Efficacy and safety of fixed combinations of latanoprost/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Grunden, JW; Kwok, K; Miglior, S, 2010
)
0.36
" Ocular and systemic adverse events were recorded."( Five-year, multicenter safety study of fixed-combination latanoprost/timolol (Xalacom) for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Alm, A; Grunden, JW; Kwok, KK,
)
0.13
"1% experienced a serious adverse event."( Five-year, multicenter safety study of fixed-combination latanoprost/timolol (Xalacom) for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Alm, A; Grunden, JW; Kwok, KK,
)
0.13
" The fixed combination is safe and well tolerated for long-term treatment in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension."( Five-year, multicenter safety study of fixed-combination latanoprost/timolol (Xalacom) for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Alm, A; Grunden, JW; Kwok, KK,
)
0.13
" The most common drug-related adverse event was hyperemia of the eye (ocular hyperemia and conjunctival hyperemia combined), occurring in 11."( Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5%-fixed combination with and without benzalkonium chloride: a prospective, randomized, doubled-masked comparison of safety and efficacy.
Bae, K; Iwamoto, Y; Kitazawa, Y; Kotake, S; Sasaki, N; Smith, P, 2011
)
0.37
"To evaluate whether transformation of the naso-lacrimal passage as happens after dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) operation has any effect on the systemic adverse effects of topically administered timolol maleate."( Effect of dacryocystorhinostomy on systemic adverse effects of topical timolol maleate.
Baral, BK; Biswas, S; Chakraborty, S; Mondal, KK; Ray, B; Roy, K,
)
0.13
"001% BAC) was the least toxic in our experimental conditions."( Toxicity evaluation of antiglaucoma drugs using stratified human cultivated corneal epithelial sheets.
Aihara, M; Amano, S; Araie, M; Kimakura, M; Miyata, K; Mori, Y; Nakagawa, S; Omichi, S; Usui, T; Yokoo, S, 2012
)
0.38
"001% or lower or non-BAC preservative sofZia was suggested to be the least toxic to the ocular surface."( Toxicity evaluation of antiglaucoma drugs using stratified human cultivated corneal epithelial sheets.
Aihara, M; Amano, S; Araie, M; Kimakura, M; Miyata, K; Mori, Y; Nakagawa, S; Omichi, S; Usui, T; Yokoo, S, 2012
)
0.38
" The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were conjunctival hyperemia in the travoprost/timolol group, and dry eye and foreign body sensation in the dorzolamide/timolol group."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fixed combination travoprost/timolol and dorzolamide/ timolol in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Andreić, V; Babić, N; Grković, D; Jovanović, P; Miljković, A,
)
0.13
" Adverse events were collected and slit-lamp examinations were performed to assess safety."( Safety and efficacy of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Chen, X; Dong, Y; Fang, A; Hu, Y; Ling, Z; Liu, D; Sun, W; Sun, X; Wang, Y; Xing, Y; Ye, J; Yin, Z; Zhang, M, 2014
)
0.4
" Adverse events occurred in 26."( Safety and efficacy of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Chen, X; Dong, Y; Fang, A; Hu, Y; Ling, Z; Liu, D; Sun, W; Sun, X; Wang, Y; Xing, Y; Ye, J; Yin, Z; Zhang, M, 2014
)
0.4
" Patients with ocular adverse events were evenly distributed in both groups."( Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015%/timolol 0.5% versus concomitant use of the ingredients.
Antón López, A; Holló, G; Hommer, A; Ropo, A, 2014
)
0.4
" However, its improved adverse effect profile seems to be beneficial in patients sensitive to preservatives."( Efficacy and safety of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.
Lorenz, K; Pfeiffer, N, 2014
)
0.4
"7 ng/ml, which can cause systemic adverse effects in patients at risk."( Paroxetine markedly increases plasma concentrations of ophthalmic timolol; CYP2D6 inhibitors may increase the risk of cardiovascular adverse effects of 0.5% timolol eye drops.
Backman, JT; Kautiainen, H; Mäenpää, J; Neuvonen, M; Neuvonen, PJ; Niemi, M; Volotinen-Maja, M, 2014
)
0.4
" In the TS, related ocular adverse events (AEs) were more frequent for patients treated with FC compared to TIM (16."( A 6-month study comparing efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% versus each of its individual preservative-free components.
Astakhov, Y; Boiko, E; Liinamaa, J; Lorenz, K; Pfeiffer, N; Ropo, A; Saarela, V; Traverso, CE; Uusitalo, H, 2014
)
0.4
" Overall, the study treatments were safe and well tolerated."( A 6-month study comparing efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% versus each of its individual preservative-free components.
Astakhov, Y; Boiko, E; Liinamaa, J; Lorenz, K; Pfeiffer, N; Ropo, A; Saarela, V; Traverso, CE; Uusitalo, H, 2014
)
0.4
" Intraocular pressure (IOP), adverse events, and ocular/systemic safety variables were also evaluated."( Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I Comparison vs. the Corresponding Preservative-free Monotherapies.
Ikäheimo, K; Kaarniranta, K; Mannermaa, E; Ropo, A, 2016
)
0.43
" There were no serious adverse effects."( Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of propranolol, timolol maleate, and the combination of the two, in the treatment of superficial infantile haemangiomas.
Cheng, C; Gong, H; Li, G; Li, YX; Wang, XK; Xu, DP, 2015
)
0.42
" Among them, 1 failed to meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 10 revoked their consent to participate in the study, 3 had adverse reactions, and 1 had a drug adherence rate of less than 70%."( Comparison of the intraocular pressure-lowering effect and safety of brimonidine/timolol fixed combination and 0.5% timolol in normal-tension glaucoma patients.
Kim, CY; Kim, HK; Kim, JM; Kim, TW; Park, KH, 2016
)
0.43
"Both LT and TT are safe and effective for the treatment of OHT associated with uveitis and greater IOP reduction may be achieved by TT than by LT treatment."( Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Latanoprost/Timolol versus Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combinations for Ocular Hypertension Associated with Uveitis.
Kanda, T; Mine, I; Sakurai, Y; Shibata, M; Taguchi, M; Takeuchi, M, 2017
)
0.46
" Ophthalmic timolol may cause serious adverse effects such as symptomatic bradycardia, various conduction disorders in the heart, orthostatic hypotension, syncope and falls."( Cardiac safety of ophthalmic timolol.
Mäenpää, J; Pelkonen, O, 2016
)
0.43
" Safety was assessed based on the documentation of adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of preoperative IOP reduction using a preservative-free fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol eye drops versus oral acetazolamide and dexamethasone eye drops and assessment of the clinical outcome of trabeculectomy in glaucoma.
Bell, K; Keicher, A; Lorenz, K; Pfeiffer, N; Renieri, G; Ruckes, C; Thieme, H; Wasielica-Poslednik, J, 2017
)
0.46
" Safety was assessed with adverse event rates, ocular discomfort score, blur scale, blood pressure and heart rates, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and slit lamp examinations."( Additive effects and safety of fixed combination therapy with 1% brinzolamide and 0.5% timolol versus 1% dorzolamide and 0.5% timolol in prostaglandin-treated glaucoma patients.
Adachi, M; Aihara, M; Fukuchi, T; Matsuo, H; Sasaki, N; Togano, T, 2017
)
0.46
" Thus, BTFC can be considered as a safe and effective agent for glaucoma treatment."( Additive effects and safety of fixed combination therapy with 1% brinzolamide and 0.5% timolol versus 1% dorzolamide and 0.5% timolol in prostaglandin-treated glaucoma patients.
Adachi, M; Aihara, M; Fukuchi, T; Matsuo, H; Sasaki, N; Togano, T, 2017
)
0.46
" The most common treatment-related adverse events for the travoprost group were ocular hyperemia and eyelash growth."( A 3-month safety and efficacy study of travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution compared with timolol in pediatric patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Aljasim, LA; Bradfield, Y; Dixon, ER; Feldman, R; Gustafson, N; Landry, T; Salem, C; Venkataraman, S, 2017
)
0.46
" Travoprost was well-tolerated, and no treatment-related systemic adverse events were reported."( A 3-month safety and efficacy study of travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution compared with timolol in pediatric patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Aljasim, LA; Bradfield, Y; Dixon, ER; Feldman, R; Gustafson, N; Landry, T; Salem, C; Venkataraman, S, 2017
)
0.46
" The present study assessed the response rate and adverse events of topical timolol in the treatment of infantile hemangioma."( Effect of topical timolol on response rate and adverse events in infantile hemangioma: a meta-analysis.
Li, Y; Zheng, L, 2018
)
0.48
" Adverse reactions and decreased effectiveness were examined."( Effectiveness and safety of switching from prostaglandin analog monotherapy to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination therapy or adding ripasudil.
Inoue, K; Ishida, K; Tomita, G, 2018
)
0.48
"0%) participants experienced adverse reactions at 1 and 3 months, respectively."( Effectiveness and safety of switching from prostaglandin analog monotherapy to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination therapy or adding ripasudil.
Inoue, K; Ishida, K; Tomita, G, 2018
)
0.48
"Treatment changes involving either switching from a PG analog to PG/timolol fixed combination eye drops or adding ripasudil to PG analog therapy were equally safe and effective in reducing IOP."( Effectiveness and safety of switching from prostaglandin analog monotherapy to prostaglandin/timolol fixed combination therapy or adding ripasudil.
Inoue, K; Ishida, K; Tomita, G, 2018
)
0.48
"Uveitis due to brimonidine is a rare adverse effect, but it must be known."( Hypertensive acute granulomatous anterior uveitis as a side effect of topical brimonidine.
Arciniegas-Perasso, CA; Clemente-Tomás, R; Duch-Samper, AM; García-Ibor, F; Hervás-Hernandis, JM; Ruiz-Del Río, N, 2018
)
0.48
" The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were ocular, with the most frequent ocular AE being conjunctival hyperemia, with an incidence of 61%, 66%, and 14%, respectively."( Long-term Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy Evaluation of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution: Rho Kinase Elevated IOP Treatment Trial (ROCKET-2).
Heah, T; Kahook, MY; Kim, T; Kopczynski, CC; Mah, FS; Novack, GD; Raizman, MB; Ramirez-Davis, N; Serle, JB; Usner, DW, 2019
)
0.51
", tafluprost/timolol (TAF/TIM) and latanoprost/carteolol (LAT/CAR), by determining their effects on intraocular pressure (IOP) in ocular normotensive monkeys and examining their toxic effects on ocular surface using human corneal epithelial cells."( Efficacy and safety of the fixed combinations of tafluprost/timolol and latanoprost/carteolol.
Akaishi, T; Fuwa, M; Kato, M; Mieda, M; Shimazaki, A; Taniguchi, T; Yamashita, N, 2019
)
0.51
" Among the reported adverse events, the neuropsychiatric spectrum has been cited, albeit for a small proportion of those treated."( Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events from Topical Ophthalmic Timolol.
Cimolai, N, 2019
)
0.51
" We included trials comparingdifferent treatments and reported response or adverse events rate in IH patients."( The efficacy and safety of treatments for infantile hemangiomas: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Chen, JJ; Guo, XD; Hu, DL; Shu, Q; Wu, XJ; Xu, S; Xuan, XX; Yang, H; Zhang, H, 2020
)
0.56
"5%, with minimal treatment-related serious or systemic adverse events (AEs)."( Pooled Efficacy and Safety Profile of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.
Fechtner, RD; Heah, T; Kim, T; Kopczynski, CC; Lewis, RA; McKee, H; Myers, JS; Sheng, H; Singh, IP; Usner, DW, 2020
)
0.56
" There are no published guidelines or protocols for use in these indications in adults, and the dermatologic community may not be familiar with adverse events that have been extensively documented relating to its ophthalmic use."( Repurposing Ophthalmologic Timolol for Dermatologic Use: Caveats and Historical Review of Adverse Events.
Dahle, SE; Gallegos, A; Isseroff, RR; Kaur, R; Schaefer, S; Tchanque-Fossuo, C; West, K; Yang, H; Yoon, DJ, 2021
)
0.62
" All treatments had some common adverse ocular effects."( Comparative evaluation of Latanoprostene Bunod, Timolol Maleate, and latanoprost Ophthalmic Solutions to assess their safety and efficacy in lowering intraocular pressure for the management of Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Liao, Y; Nie, X; Wang, Y, 2020
)
0.56
" Ocular treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 42."( Efficacy and safety of fixed-combination brimonidine tartrate/timolol maleate in primary open-angle glaucoma, including normal-tension glaucoma.
Kim, JM; Lee, JW; Maglambayan, J; Park, KH; Park, SW; Simonyi, S, 2021
)
0.62
" Vital signs and adverse effects were recorded at each visit."( Efficacy and Safety of Topical Timolol for the Treatment of Infantile Hemangioma in the Early Proliferative Stage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Baselga, E; Bernabeu-Wittel, J; Gich, I; Montserrat-García, MT; Muñoz-Garza, FZ; Puig, L; Ríos, M; Roé-Crespo, E, 2021
)
0.62
" An improvement in color was observed at week 4 in the timolol group, and timolol was well tolerated with no systemic adverse effects."( Efficacy and Safety of Topical Timolol for the Treatment of Infantile Hemangioma in the Early Proliferative Stage: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Baselga, E; Bernabeu-Wittel, J; Gich, I; Montserrat-García, MT; Muñoz-Garza, FZ; Puig, L; Ríos, M; Roé-Crespo, E, 2021
)
0.62
"Preservative-free topical medications have been introduced for glaucoma care to reduce ocular adverse events associated with preservatives."( Comparative efficacy and safety of preserved versus preservative-free beta-blockers in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a systematic review.
Azuara-Blanco, A; Freiberg, J; Kolko, M; Rives, AS; Skov, AG; Virgili, G, 2022
)
0.72
" Subgroup analysis of adjunctive RKI efficacy and additional review of its major ocular adverse events (AE) were also performed."( Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy and ocular safety of Rho-kinase inhibitor in glaucoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review of prospective randomized trials.
Chang, SN; Kuo, BI; Lin, JW; Nishida, T; Wu, JH, 2022
)
0.72
" Most adverse events (AEs) were mild, and no serious treatment-related AEs were reported."( Twelve-month efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl, a selective EP2 agonist, in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: the RENGE study.
Aihara, M; Iwata, A; Kawata, H; Lu, F; Odani-Kawabata, N, 2021
)
0.62
" Changes in color, size, bleeding tendency, physicians' and patients' global assessments and adverse events were assessed."( Effectiveness and safety of 0.5% timolol solution in the treatment of pyogenic granuloma: A randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study.
Ahmed, SS; Das, NK; Datta, A; Dogra, S; Hazra, A; Kaliyadan, F; Khandpur, S; Mondal, N; Panda, S; Patra, AC; Rahaman, S; Roy, S; Setia, MS; Sil, A,
)
0.13
" Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and corneal endothelial cell density (CECD)."( Phase 3, Randomized, 20-Month Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost Implant in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (ARTEMIS 2).
Bacharach, J; Bejanian, M; Belalcázar, S; Chen, MY; Ferguson, G; Goodkin, ML; Guo, Q; Liu, J; Robinson, MR; Tatham, A; Thieme, H; Wirta, DL, 2021
)
0.62
"Brimonidine had a similar side effect profile to the fix combination."( Comparing the effects and safety of dorzolamide hydrochloride + timolol maleate versus brimonidine after neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser capsulotomy posterior capsule opacification.
Çakmak, K; Erbil, H; Korkmaz, Ş; Mesci, C, 2022
)
0.72
" A more conservative random effect model meta-analysis technique was used to analyze the efficacy and adverse reactions of timolol and lasers."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of lasers, topical timolol, and combination therapy for the treatment of infantile hemangioma: A meta-analysis of 10 studies.
Cai, B; Chen, X; Huang, H; Wang, B; Yu, J, 2022
)
0.72
" PF FC therapies, such as PF tafluprost/timolol FC, avoid ocular surface exposure to toxic preservative agents and reduce the required number of treatment administrations."( Reviewing the evidence surrounding preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed-dose combination therapy in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension management: a focus on efficacy, safety, and tolerability.
Oddone, F, 2022
)
0.72

Pharmacokinetics

The pharmacokinetic profiles of transdermal timolol 6 and 24 mg (as 5 and 20% w/v patches) was studied in four healthy young volunteers. The correlation between the calculated occupancy of beta-adrenergic receptors and the systemic side effects after instillation could be successfully analyzed.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Applying a theory for translating the pharmacokinetics to the duration-action course of drug, pharmacokinetic t1/2 was proven to be much shorter than pharmacological t1/2."( Pharmacokinetic differences between single and multiple oral dosing with the guidance for beta-adrenoceptor blockade assessment.
Ishizaki, T; Tawara, K, 1979
)
0.26
" The poor metaboliser phenotype is associated with increased plasma drug concentrations, a prolongation of elimination half-life and more intense and sustained beta-blockade."( The polymorphic oxidation of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations.
Lennard, MS; Tucker, GT; Woods, HF,
)
0.13
"The pharmacokinetic profiles of transdermal timolol 6 and 24 mg (as 5 and 20% w/v patches) was studied in four healthy young volunteers."( Pharmacokinetics and beta-blocking effects of transdermal timolol.
Ishizaki, T; Kikuchi, K; Koyama, E; Kubota, K; Yamada, T, 1993
)
0.29
"To develop methods for constructing a pharmacokinetic model to predict the time course of aqueous humor and plasma drug concentrations after topical dosage in rabbits using the simulation program iThink (formerly STELLA; High Performance Systems, Lyme, NH)."( A model to predict aqueous humor and plasma pharmacokinetics of ocularly applied drugs.
Grass, GM; Lee, VH, 1993
)
0.29
" A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model was used to fit the aqueous humor level for determining the drainage (kd) and absorption rate constants (ka) in the precorneal area as well as the elimination rate constant (ke) of timolol in aqueous humor."( Pharmacokinetics and intraocular pressure lowering effect of timolol preparations in rabbit eyes.
Chen, JL; Chiang, CH; Ho, JI, 1996
)
0.29
" The Cmax of carteolol (4."( Pharmacokinetics of topical beta-adrenergic antagonists in rabbit aqueous humor evaluated with the microdialysis method.
Fukuda, S; Kanda, Y; Kiuchi, Y; Koide, R; Oguchi, K; Ohtori, R; Sato, H; Ueda, T, 1998
)
0.3
" On the basis of these results, an in vivo pharmacokinetic model was developed for estimation of penetration parameters."( Characterization of ocular pharmacokinetics of beta-blockers using a diffusion model after instillation.
Ichikawa, M; Mukai, T; Nakamura, J; Nakashima, M; Nishida, K; Sasaki, H; Yamamura, K, 1999
)
0.3
"The ocular absorption of timolol and tilisolol was characterized using an in vivo pharmacokinetic model and in vivo penetration parameters."( Characterization of ocular pharmacokinetics of beta-blockers using a diffusion model after instillation.
Ichikawa, M; Mukai, T; Nakamura, J; Nakashima, M; Nishida, K; Sasaki, H; Yamamura, K, 1999
)
0.3
" A comparison is also presented between several methods based on animal pharmacokinetic data, using the same set of proprietary compounds, and it lends further support for the use of this method, as opposed to methods that require the gathering of pharmacokinetic data in laboratory animals."( Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
Gao, F; Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Shalaeva, MY, 2004
)
0.32
"25%) in terms of in vitro release and IOP lowering pharmacodynamic effect."( Improved pharmacodynamics of timolol maleate from a mucoadhesive niosomal ophthalmic drug delivery system.
Aggarwal, D; Kaur, IP, 2005
)
0.33
" Although in the initial 15 min the drug concentrations in AH were comparable to that of the timolol solution, increased Cmax and significantly improved ocular bioavailability were obtained for the gel."( Pharmacokinetics of timolol in aqueous humor sampled by microdialysis after topical administration of thermosetting gels.
Ding, PT; Lu, WY; Wei, G; Zheng, JM, 2006
)
0.33
" The correlation between the calculated occupancy of beta-adrenergic receptors and the systemic side effects after instillation could be successfully analyzed with a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model, showing the predictability of the model for the systemic side effects of timolol."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of systemic effect of topically applied timolol maleate ophthalmic gelling vehicle (Rysmon TG).
Araie, M; Iga, T; Nagahara, M; Ohno, Y; Takayanagi, R; Yamada, Y, 2005
)
0.33
" In vitro kinetics and in vivo pharmacokinetic profiles after oral administration of timolol, metoprolol, and propranolol, were investigated in rats using the depletion assay."( Application of substrate depletion assay for early prediction of nonlinear pharmacokinetics in drug discovery: assessment of nonlinearity of metoprolol, timolol, and propranolol.
Iwaki, M; Kawase, A; Komura, H, 2005
)
0.33
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"We have constructed a new ocular pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for anti-glaucoma drugs to describe ocular hypotensive effects on intraocular pressure (IOP) after instillation of a combination of an alpha(1)-adrenergic antagonist, bunazosin, and a beta-adrenergic antagonist, timolol, into rabbits."( Ocular pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling for multiple anti-glaucoma drugs.
Higuchi, S; Kawazu, K; Kitahara, T; Nakamura, J; Nakashima, M; Nishida, K; Sakanaka, K; Sasaki, H; Tomonari, M, 2008
)
0.35
" Comparative pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies with four beta blockers were performed in conscious rats, using heart rate under isoprenaline-induced tachycardia as a pharmacodynamic endpoint."( Influence of plasma protein binding on pharmacodynamics: Estimation of in vivo receptor affinities of beta blockers using a new mechanism-based PK-PD modelling approach.
Boralli, VB; Danhof, M; de Lange, EC; Freijer, J; Krekels, EH; Slijkerman, P; van Steeg, TJ, 2009
)
0.35
"The aim of the present study was to assess the pharmacodynamic equivalence (lowering of intraocular pressure) of two preparations of eye drops containing 20 mg dorzolamide (CAS 120279-96-1) and 5 mg timolol (CAS 26839-75-8)."( Pharmacodynamic equivalence study of two preparations of eye drops containing dorzolamide and timolol in healthy volunteers.
Demircheva, I; Gatchev, E; Hristova, R; Kolev, E; Koytchev, R; Petrov, A; Richter, W; Tegel, F; Thyroff-Friesinger, U, 2011
)
0.37
" In order to investigate the pharmacodynamic equivalence of both products, the two-sided 95% confidence interval was calculated for the difference of the primary target parameter (absolute decrease in IOP 2 h post dose), by means of a parametric (ANOVA) statistical method."( Pharmacodynamic equivalence study of two preparations of eye drops containing dorzolamide and timolol in healthy volunteers.
Demircheva, I; Gatchev, E; Hristova, R; Kolev, E; Koytchev, R; Petrov, A; Richter, W; Tegel, F; Thyroff-Friesinger, U, 2011
)
0.37
"PF FDC demonstrated good IOP-lowering efficacy and displayed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics to the monotherapy agents."( Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I Comparison vs. the Corresponding Preservative-free Monotherapies.
Ikäheimo, K; Kaarniranta, K; Mannermaa, E; Ropo, A, 2016
)
0.43
" In vivo pharmacokinetic studies indicated that TM-TSG could enhance absorption of TM in aqueous humor and improve the ocular bioavailability in comparison of commercial TM eyedrops."( Thermo-sensitive gel in glaucoma therapy for enhanced bioavailability: In vitro characterization, in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study.
Chen, J; Huang, J; Huang, Y; Huang, Z; Li, Y; Pan, X; Wu, C; Zeng, Y, 2018
)
0.48
" Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained using a compartmental fitting approach, and the estimated clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life values were the following: atenolol (6."( Ocular Intracameral Pharmacokinetics for a Cocktail of Timolol, Betaxolol, and Atenolol in Rabbits.
Del Amo, EM; Fayyaz, A; Gardner, I; Heikkinen, EM; Jamei, M; Ranta, VP; Reinisalo, M; Ricci, GD; Toropainen, E; Urtti, A; Vellonen, KS, 2020
)
0.56
"Ocular bioavailability after eye drops administration is an important, but rarely determined, pharmacokinetic parameter."( Topical ocular pharmacokinetics and bioavailability for a cocktail of atenolol, timolol and betaxolol in rabbits.
Del Amo, EM; Fayyaz, A; Gardner, I; Jamei, M; Puranen, J; Ranta, VP; Ruponen, M; Toropainen, E; Urtti, A; Valtari, A; Vellonen, KS, 2020
)
0.56

Compound-Compound Interactions

Topically applied 4% timolol, 4%Timolol combined with 2% pilocarpine, 6% timOLol, and 6% Timolol Combined with 2.4% were evaluated in clinically normal Beagles and Beagles with glaucoma. The effects of timoll alone and in combination with a fixed dose of hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride have been studied in fifty-four patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The effects of timolol alone and in combination with a fixed dose of hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride have been studied in a double-blind, controlled study in fifty-four patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension."( Evaluation of the effect of timolol alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride in the treatment of mild to moderate arterial hypertension: a double-blind, controlled study.
Agabiti-Rosei, E; Alicandri, C; Ambrosioni, E; Magnani, B; Miele, N; Muiesan, G, 1976
)
0.26
"In 39 selected patients with open-angle glaucoma, in whom pressure regulation with Timolol alone was inadequate, success was achieved by using this drug in combination with various other glaucoma drugs over treatment periods of 12 to 18 months."( [Timolol in combination with other glaucoma drugs (author's transl)].
Merkle, W, 1981
)
0.26
"Once-daily latanoprost treatment provides uniform circadian (around-the-clock) IOP reduction by itself, or in combination with timolol."( Around-the-clock intraocular pressure reduction with once-daily application of latanoprost by itself or in combination with timolol.
Bito, LZ; Gaygi, Z; Nagy, ZT; Rácz, P; Ruzsonyi, MR, 1996
)
0.29
"Topically applied 4% timolol, 4% timolol combined with 2% pilocarpine, 6% timolol, and 6% timolol combined with 2% pilocarpine were evaluated in clinically normal Beagles and Beagles with glaucoma."( Evaluation of multiple doses of 4 and 6% timolol, and timolol combined with 2% pilocarpine in clinically normal beagles and beagles with glaucoma.
Gelatt, JK; Gelatt, KN; Larocca, RD; MacKay, EO; Strubbe, DT, 1995
)
0.29
"5%, or oral acetazolamide 250 mg when used alone or when dorzolamide is combined with either timolol or acetazolamide."( Effects on aqueous flow of dorzolamide combined with either timolol or acetazolamide.
Camras, CB; Toris, CB; Yablonski, ME; Zhan, GL, 2004
)
0.32
"5% alone or combined with latanoprost in reducing IOP in a real-world setting."( Effectiveness and safety of dorzolamide-timolol alone or combined with latanoprost in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bastien, NR; Koulis, T; Lesk, MR; Sampalis, F; Sampalis, JS, 2008
)
0.35
"A Snovel method for the simultaneous separation and determination of two antiglaucoma drugs namely, dorzolamide hydrochloride (DOR) and timolol maleate (TIM) in aqueous humor samples (AH) was developed by using salting-out assisted liquid-liquid microextraction (SALLME) combined with HPLC-UV method."( Simultaneous determination of dorzolomide and timolol in aqueous humor: a novel salting out liquid-liquid microextraction combined with HPLC.
Abdel-Wadood, HM; Mohamed, AM; Mousa, HS, 2014
)
0.4
" However, no studies have evaluated ripasudil combined with β-blockers and prostaglandin analogues."( Additive Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Effects of the Rho Kinase Inhibitor Ripasudil (K-115) Combined With Timolol or Latanoprost: A Report of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Abe, H; Araie, M; Inoue, T; Kuwayama, Y; Suganami, H; Tanihara, H; Yamamoto, T, 2015
)
0.42
"These clinical trials found additive IOP-lowering effects of ripasudil from placebo at trough and peak levels in combination with timolol and at peak level in combination with latanoprost."( Additive Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Effects of the Rho Kinase Inhibitor Ripasudil (K-115) Combined With Timolol or Latanoprost: A Report of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Abe, H; Araie, M; Inoue, T; Kuwayama, Y; Suganami, H; Tanihara, H; Yamamoto, T, 2015
)
0.42
" Our study suggested that oral propranolol combined with topical timolol treatment is very effective and well-tolerated for compound IHs, which can be used as a first line treatment."( Oral propranolol combined with topical timolol for compound infantile hemangiomas: a retrospective study.
Ge, J; Yuan, W; Zhang, L; Zhao, H; Zheng, J, 2016
)
0.43
"To examine the relevance of concentration of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on the cornea, we investigated the effects of latanoprost containing BAK alone and in combination with other antiglaucoma drug classes on corneal epithelium in vitro in a cultured rabbit corneal cell line (SIRC) and in vivo, using a corneal resistance device (CRD)."( In vitro and in vivo corneal effects of latanoprost combined with brimonidine, timolol, dorzolamide, or brinzolamide.
Fukuda, M; Sasaki, H; Shibata, N; Shibata, S; Shibata, T; Sugiyama, K; Takeda, N, 2016
)
0.43
" The proposed methods were applied to two pharmaceutical formulations; the method for HCT and AMH has proven as reliable assaying method, whereas the method for TML, when combined with HCT, is applicable to screening semi-quantitative analyses."( Simultaneous spectrofluorometric analysis of tablets containing hydrochlorothiazide combined with timolol maleate or amiloride hydrochloride.
Lataifeh, A; Mohammed, MS; Wedian, F, 2020
)
0.56
"The aim of study was to understand anti-glaucoma fixed dose drug combination use in real-world settings, focussing on drug selection, repeated prescription of the same active ingredient, and administration of fixed dose combinations, thus providing a reference for doctors during prescription and pharmacists during prescription review, ultimately educating patients on medication."( The use of fixed dose drug combinations for glaucoma in clinical settings: a retrospective, observational, single-centre study.
Huang, T; Shen, J; Xiong, X; Yan, J, 2022
)
0.72

Bioavailability

The ocular bioavailability of timolol increased in sorbic acid solution due to ion pair formation. The absorption rate of latanoprost and Timolol into the aqueous humor was similar after administration of the FC compared to the two drugs given separately.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Bioavailability was reduced by 25% when the drug was taken orally."( Plasma timolol levels after oral and intravenous administration.
Edwards, IR; Else, OF; Sorenson, H, 1978
)
0.26
" This leads to in situ formation of a super-saturated ME that possesses a particularly high absorption rate due to the enhanced diffusion pressure of the drug."( Pharmacodynamic effects of transdermal bupranolol and timolol in vivo: comparison of microemulsions and matrix patches as vehicle.
Kemken, J; Müller, BW; Ziegler, A, 1991
)
0.28
" D-Timolol was well absorbed across the cornea as L-timolol and produced the duration of action as long as L-timolol."( Development of D-timolol for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Chiou, GC, 1990
)
0.28
" The bioavailability of timolol from the microemulsion and the ion-pair solution was higher than that obtained from timolol alone."( Microemulsions as topical delivery vehicles: ocular administration of timolol.
Bauchiero, L; Chiappero, O; Gallarate, M; Gasco, MR; Gremmo, E; Trotta, M, 1989
)
0.28
" In terms of topical ophthalmic drug delivery, the noncorneal absorption route may be important for drugs that are poorly absorbed across the cornea due to their physical-chemical properties."( Importance of the noncorneal absorption route in topical ophthalmic drug delivery.
Ahmed, I; Patton, TF, 1985
)
0.27
"Nasolacrimal occlusion (NLO) and eyelid closure are simple techniques that not only increase the ocular bioavailability of topically applied ocular drugs but also reduce the probability of adverse systemic effects."( Improving the therapeutic index of topically applied ocular drugs.
Kandarakis, AS; Kooner, KS; Ziegler, LP; Zimmerman, TJ, 1984
)
0.27
"The systemic bioavailability of timolol, a beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agent, was calculated from published data in normal volunteers and uremic patients after oral doses."( Estimation of the systemic bioavailability of timolol in man.
El-Rashidy, R,
)
0.13
" The systemic bioavailability ranged from 61% for atenolol to 100% for timolol."( Systemic absorption pathways of topically applied beta adrenergic antagonists in the pigmented rabbit.
Kompella, UB; Lee, VH; Lee, YH, 1993
)
0.29
" Ocular bioavailability is determined by the ability of drug to penetrate through the cornea and conjunctiva/sclera, and on the other hand, by its elimination from the conjunctival sac."( Delivery of antiglaucoma drugs: ocular vs systemic absorption.
Urtti, A, 1994
)
0.29
" A better understanding of the mechanisms involved in transcorneal permeation could lead to improvements in drug dosage forms or the development of drug delivery devices which enhance the ocular bioavailability of drugs."( Theoretical corneal permeation model for ionizable drugs.
Cheng, YL; Friedrich, SW; Saville, BA, 1993
)
0.29
" When the 20% (w/v) timolol patch was applied, the mean bioavailability was 74."( Pharmacokinetics and beta-blocking effects of transdermal timolol.
Ishizaki, T; Kikuchi, K; Koyama, E; Kubota, K; Yamada, T, 1993
)
0.29
" Ocular bioavailability as well as toxicity for timolol hemihydrate is similar to that which has been shown previously for timolol maleate."( Timolol hemihydrate: a new formulation of timolol for the treatment of glaucoma.
Stewart, WC, 1996
)
0.29
"The new vehicle obviously improves the bioavailability of topically applied timolol."( How can the bioavailability of timolol be enhanced? A pharmacokinetic pilot study of novel hydrogels.
Brewitt, H; Mayer, H; Stark, M; von der Ohe, N, 1996
)
0.29
" A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model was used to fit the aqueous humor level for determining the drainage (kd) and absorption rate constants (ka) in the precorneal area as well as the elimination rate constant (ke) of timolol in aqueous humor."( Pharmacokinetics and intraocular pressure lowering effect of timolol preparations in rabbit eyes.
Chen, JL; Chiang, CH; Ho, JI, 1996
)
0.29
"This pilot suggests that need for a longer-term study with larger numbers of subjects to evaluate the potential role of silicone punctal plugs to enhance the ocular bioavailability of topically applied antiglaucoma medications."( Efficacy of silicone punctal plugs as adjuncts to topical pharmacotherapy of glaucoma--a pilot study. Punctal Plugs in Glaucoma Study Group.
Bartlett, JD; Boan, K; Corliss, D; Gaddie, IB, 1996
)
0.29
"To improve the bioavailability of the ocular drug timolol by facilitating its transport through the cornea, an amphiphilic prodrug was synthesized via the addition of a palmitic chain by esterification."( Tensioactivity and supramolecular organization of the palmitoyl prodrug of timolol.
Benoit, JP; Bouligand, Y; Pech, B; Proust, JE, 1997
)
0.3
"A new formulation (HYA) based on timolol hyaluronate and pilocarpine hyaluronate salts has been shown to improve the bioavailability of the drugs and to extend the duration of their action."( Pharmacological evaluation of a new timolol/pilocarpine formulation.
Bucolo, C; Mangiafico, S; Spadaro, A, 1998
)
0.3
"The quantitative structure-bioavailability relationship of 232 structurally diverse drugs was studied to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a predictive model for the human oral bioavailability of prospective new medicinal agents."( QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
Topliss, JG; Yoshida, F, 2000
)
0.31
" This information may serve as a basis for optimizing the intraocular delivery of drugs that are poorly absorbed across the cornea due to their physicochemical properties."( Physicochemical determinants of drug diffusion across the conjunctiva, sclera, and cornea.
Ahmed, I; Gokhale, RD; Patton, TF; Shah, MV, 1987
)
0.27
"Under the present experimental conditions (including concentration and bioavailability of the drugs used), topical application of the NOS inhibitors 7-NI, L-NAME, and AMT does not prevent an IOP increase induced by water intake in rabbits."( Topical ocular instillation of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors and intraocular pressure in rabbits.
Elena, PP; Flammer, J; Fleischhauer, JC; Haefliger, IO; Liu, R, 2001
)
0.31
"This paper describes a graphical model for simplifying in vitro absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination (ADME) data analysis through the estimation of oral bioavailability (%F) of drugs in humans and other species."( Graphical model for estimating oral bioavailability of drugs in humans and other species from their Caco-2 permeability and in vitro liver enzyme metabolic stability rates.
Hwang, KK; Mandagere, AK; Thompson, TN, 2002
)
0.31
" The absorption rate of latanoprost and timolol into the aqueous humor was similar after administration of the FC compared to the two drugs given separately."( Bioavailability in the human eye of a fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol compared to monotherapy.
Calissendorff, B; Grunge-Lowerud, A; Högberg, G; Sjöquist, B, 2002
)
0.31
" The systemic bioavailability (F) of the eyedrop was 78."( Systemic bioavailability and cardiopulmonary effects of 0.5% timolol eyedrops.
Kaila, T; Korte, JM; Saari, KM, 2002
)
0.31
" Clinicians should pay attention to the high systemic bioavailability of ophthalmic timolol, because intensive systemic beta-blockade can be highly hazardous to aged patients suffering from cardiopulmonary diseases."( Systemic bioavailability and cardiopulmonary effects of 0.5% timolol eyedrops.
Kaila, T; Korte, JM; Saari, KM, 2002
)
0.31
" The results of this study suggest that PS could be regarded as a potential corneal enhancer to increase the intraocular bioavailability of AC and TM."( Enhancer effects on in vitro corneal permeation of timolol and acyclovir.
Bucolo, C; Montenegro, L; Puglisi, G, 2003
)
0.32
"The ocular bioavailability of timolol increased in sorbic acid solution due to ion pair formation."( Improvement of the ocular bioavailability of timolol by sorbic acid.
Higashiyama, M; Inada, K; Ohtori, A; Tojo, K, 2004
)
0.32
" A new timolol maleate solution has been formulated that contains potassium sorbate (timolol-LA [TLA; Istalol(R)]) to enhance the ocular bioavailability of timolol instilled into the eye, as well as half the benzalkonium chloride preservative found in timolol maleate."( A 12-month, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group comparison of timolol-LA once daily and timolol maleate ophthalmic solution twice daily in the treatment of adults with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Crockett, RS; Mundorf, TK; Naka, H; Novack, GD; Ogawa, T, 2004
)
0.32
" In the present study, we desired to evaluate the ocular comfort and systemic bioavailability of TLA in healthy volunteers in comparison to standard timolol maleate ophthalmic solution (TIM)."( Timolol LA: a double-masked, active-controlled, randomized, crossover, comfort, ocular safety, and systemic bioavailability study in healthy volunteers.
Crockett, RS; Inui, N; Mundorf, TK; Naka, H; Novack, GD; Ogawa, T, 2005
)
0.33
" Although in the initial 15 min the drug concentrations in AH were comparable to that of the timolol solution, increased Cmax and significantly improved ocular bioavailability were obtained for the gel."( Pharmacokinetics of timolol in aqueous humor sampled by microdialysis after topical administration of thermosetting gels.
Ding, PT; Lu, WY; Wei, G; Zheng, JM, 2006
)
0.33
"The lower timolol concentration in the hydrogel vehicle and its better bioavailability resulted in reduced systemic absorption and side-effects without loss of efficacy."( Efficacy and systemic side-effects of topical 0.5% timolol aqueous solution and 0.1% timolol hydrogel.
Kähönen, M; Niño, J; Ropo, A; Tahvanainen, K; Tuominen, J; Turjanmaa, V; Uusitalo, H, 2005
)
0.33
" Poor ocular bioavailability of drugs (< 1%) from conventional eye drops is due mainly to the precorneal loss factors that include rapid tear turnover, nonproductive absorption, transient residence time in the cul-de-sac, and the relative impermeability of the drugs to corneal epithelial membrane."( Sustained ocular drug delivery from a temperature and pH triggered novel in situ gel system.
Gupta, H; Jain, S; Mathur, R; Mishra, AK; Mishra, P; Velpandian, T, 2007
)
0.34
" The extent of absorption of TM-SE patch expressed by AUC was 64% larger as compared to the oral solution with steady plasma concentration over 18 h and relative bioavailability (F(rel)) of 163%."( Novel transdermal delivery of Timolol maleate using sugar esters: preclinical and clinical studies.
El-Laithy, HM, 2009
)
0.35
"In situ gel-forming systems have drawn much attention of current researchers to overcome the poor bioavailability from the conventional eye drops."( Development and characterization of 99mTc-timolol maleate for evaluating efficacy of in situ ocular drug delivery system.
Ali, A; Aqil, M; Bhatnagar, A; Gupta, H; Jain, S; Khar, RK; Mittal, G, 2009
)
0.35
"Surface-modified solid lipid nanoparticles could provide an efficient way of improving ocular bioavailability of timolol hydrogen maleate."( Sustained release and permeation of timolol from surface-modified solid lipid nanoparticles through bioengineered human cornea.
Attama, AA; Müller-Goymann, CC; Reichl, S, 2009
)
0.35
" However, low drug-contact time and poor ocular bioavailability of drugs due to drainage of solution, tear turnover and its dilution or lacrimation limits its uses."( Hyaluronic acid modified chitosan nanoparticles for effective management of glaucoma: development, characterization, and evaluation.
Paliwal, R; Paliwal, SR; Vyas, SP; Wadhwa, S, 2010
)
0.36
"Poor bioavailability (<1%) of drugs from conventional eye drops is mainly due to the various precorneal loss factors which include rapid tear turnover, systemic drug absorption through naso-lachrymal duct, transient residence time of the drug solution in the cul-de-sac and the relative impermeability of the drugs to corneal epithelial membrane."( Ion- and pH-activated novel in-situ gel system for sustained ocular drug delivery.
Gupta, H; Jain, S; Velpandian, T, 2010
)
0.36
"Oral bioavailability (F) is a product of fraction absorbed (Fa), fraction escaping gut-wall elimination (Fg), and fraction escaping hepatic elimination (Fh)."( Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
Chang, G; El-Kattan, A; Miller, HR; Obach, RS; Rotter, C; Steyn, SJ; Troutman, MD; Varma, MV, 2010
)
0.36
" pH, in the cul-de-sac of the eye for providing a prolonged effect and increased bioavailability with reduction in frequency of administration."( Stimuli-sensitive hydrogels: a novel ophthalmic drug delivery system.
Appala, R; Bushetti, SS; Imam, SS; Shareef, A; Singh, M; Singh, V,
)
0.13
" Precorneal retention study in vivo indicated that the optimal liposomal-hydrogel formulation had improved bioavailability and its retention time on rabbit corneal surface were significantly longer than that of pure liposomes or eye-drops."( Novel ophthalmic timolol meleate liposomal-hydrogel and its improved local glaucomatous therapeutic effect in vivo.
Luo, QH; Nie, SF; Pan, WS; Yang, ZJ; Zhang, HH,
)
0.13
"Ophthalmic drug delivery through eye drops is inefficient because of low corneal bioavailability and short residence time in tears."( Temperature sensitive contact lenses for triggered ophthalmic drug delivery.
Chauhan, A; Jung, HJ, 2012
)
0.38
" In addition, lenses with one-third of the drug loading as eye drops resulted in the similar IOP reduction, suggesting higher bioavailability for contact lenses compared to eye drops."( Drug delivery by contact lens in spontaneously glaucomatous dogs.
Ben-Shlomo, A; Chauhan, A; Mackay, EO; Peng, CC; Plummer, CE, 2012
)
0.38
"Ophthalmic drug delivery through contact lenses increases bioavailability and reduces systemic drug uptake."( Drug delivery by contact lens in spontaneously glaucomatous dogs.
Ben-Shlomo, A; Chauhan, A; Mackay, EO; Peng, CC; Plummer, CE, 2012
)
0.38
" The in vivo studies showed that IOP reduction from baseline by pure contact lens on daily basis was comparable with that by eye drops but with only 20% of drug dose, which suggested higher drug bioavailability for contact lenses."( Extended drug delivery by contact lenses for glaucoma therapy.
Burke, MT; Carbia, BE; Chauhan, A; Peng, CC; Plummer, C, 2012
)
0.38
" We propose to develop drug-eluting contact lenses for managing glaucoma with increased bioavailability and improved compliance."( Dual drug delivery from vitamin E loaded contact lenses for glaucoma therapy.
Carbia, BE; Chauhan, A; Hsu, KH; Plummer, C, 2015
)
0.42
" In conclusion, resins have great potential as effective ocular drug delivery carriers to increase ocular bioavailability of timolol while simultaneously reducing systemic drug absorption."( Preparation and evaluation of a timolol maleate drug-resin ophthalmic suspension as a sustained-release formulation in vitro and in vivo.
Cao, J; Liu, W; Qin, F; Wang, X; Zeng, L; Zhu, Y, 2016
)
0.43
" From in vitro permeation studies, we can conclude that TM-loaded transfersomes may enhance the corneal transmittance and improve the bioavailability of conventional TM delivery."( Deformability properties of timolol-loaded transfersomes based on the extrusion mechanism. Statistical optimization of the process.
Arroyo, CM; Calle, M; Canca, D; Cózar-Bernal, MJ; González-R, PL; González-Rodríguez, ML; León, JM; Rabasco, AM, 2016
)
0.43
" Current ocular drug delivery in treating glaucoma is confronting a variety of challenges, such as low corneal permeability and bioavailability due to the unique anatomical structure of the human eye."( Ocular Cubosome Drug Delivery System for Timolol Maleate: Preparation, Characterization, Cytotoxicity, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo Evaluation.
Huang, J; Huang, Y; Li, Y; Pan, X; Peng, T; Wu, C; Wu, CY; Zeng, Y; Zhan, Z, 2017
)
0.46
" Ocular pharmacokinetic study performed in normotensive rabbits showed that HyNa-TM complex exhibited attractive bioavailability properties in the aqueous humor (AUC and Cmax significantly higher and later Tmax) compared to commercial TM eye-drops."( The role of hyaluronan as a drug carrier to enhance the bioavailability of extended release ophthalmic formulations. Hyaluronan-timolol ionic complexes as a model case.
Allemandi, DA; Battistini, FD; Boiero, C; Guzmán, ML; Luciani-Giaccobbe, LC; Manzo, RH; Olivera, ME; Palma, SD; Tártara, LI, 2017
)
0.46
"Contact lenses are receiving significant attention for delivering ophthalmic drugs with higher bioavailability compared to eye drops."( Effect of the surface layer on drug release from delefilcon-A (Dailies Total1
Chauhan, A; Dixon, P, 2017
)
0.46
"The poor retention and penetration are the major issues in the bioavailability of drugs through ocular route."( Development of Timolol Maleate Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles For Improved Ocular Delivery.
Kaushik, D; Pandey, P; Saroha, A, 2017
)
0.46
" It is possible that the co-instillation of MH nanoparticles may provide a useful way to improve the bioavailability of water-soluble drugs in the ophthalmic field."( Co-instillation of nano-solid magnesium hydroxide enhances corneal permeability of dissolved timolol.
Kanai, K; Kawasaki, N; Nagai, N; Nakazawa, Y; Ogata, F; Okamoto, N; Otake, H; Shimomura, Y, 2017
)
0.46
" Poor bioavailability of ophthalmic solutions can be overcome by using smart ophthalmic drug-delivery systems."( Nanogel-based natural polymers as smart carriers for the controlled delivery of Timolol Maleate through the cornea for glaucoma.
Ashtari, K; Ilka, R; Kianirad, M; Mehravi, B; Mohseni, M; Naseripour, M, 2018
)
0.48
" However, the conventional formulation of TM and BRZ exhibits sub optimal therapeutic effects attributable to the poor ocular bioavailability of these drugs."( Fabrication and Characterization of Timolol Maleate and Brinzolamide Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carrier System for Ocular Drug Delivery.
Ali, J; Baboota, S; Khan, S; Shrivastava, N, 2018
)
0.48
"Rapid clearance and low ocular bioavailability are drawbacks of conventional ophthalmic eye drops."( In situ formation of injectable chitosan-gelatin hydrogels through double crosslinking for sustained intraocular drug delivery.
Abe, T; Kaji, H; Nagai, N; Nishizawa, M; Saijo, S; Song, Y, 2018
)
0.48
" These data indicate that the prepared GNPs possessed all needed qualities of a successful ocular system; corneal affinity, suitable particle size, high entrapment efficiency, sustained release, good stability, efficient lowering of intraocular pressure, high drug bioavailability and lack of irritancy."( Exploring gelatin nanoparticles as novel nanocarriers for Timolol Maleate: Augmented in-vivo efficacy and safe histological profile.
Hathout, RM; Mansour, S; Shokry, M, 2018
)
0.48
" Rapid clearance and low ocular bioavailability are drawbacks of conventional ocular treatments."( Chitosan-Gelatin Hydrogel Crosslinked With Oxidized Sucrose for the Ocular Delivery of Timolol Maleate.
Alsharif, FM; El-Feky, GS; Elshaier, YAMM; Zayed, GM, 2018
)
0.48
" The present study was aimed to develop a timolol maleate loaded thermo-sensitive gel (TM-TSG) with improved bioavailability to treat glaucoma."( Thermo-sensitive gel in glaucoma therapy for enhanced bioavailability: In vitro characterization, in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study.
Chen, J; Huang, J; Huang, Y; Huang, Z; Li, Y; Pan, X; Wu, C; Zeng, Y, 2018
)
0.48
" In vivo pharmacokinetic studies indicated that TM-TSG could enhance absorption of TM in aqueous humor and improve the ocular bioavailability in comparison of commercial TM eyedrops."( Thermo-sensitive gel in glaucoma therapy for enhanced bioavailability: In vitro characterization, in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study.
Chen, J; Huang, J; Huang, Y; Huang, Z; Li, Y; Pan, X; Wu, C; Zeng, Y, 2018
)
0.48
"2-fold) and bioavailability (2."( Co-delivery of latanoprost and timolol from micelles-laden contact lenses for the treatment of glaucoma.
Bu, R; Feng, S; Ge, Y; Gou, J; He, H; Tang, X; Wang, J; Xu, J; Yin, T; Zhang, A; Zhang, Y, 2019
)
0.51
"Thin and erodible polymeric films were developed as potential ocular drug delivery systems to increase drug retention on the eye with the aim of improving bioavailability and achieving controlled drug release."( Development and evaluation of performance characteristics of timolol-loaded composite ocular films as potential delivery platforms for treatment of glaucoma.
Boateng, JS; Mitchell, JC; Tighsazzadeh, M, 2019
)
0.51
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
"To enhance bioavailability of timolol (TML) and utilize alternatives for traditional eye drops for more patient compliance, this study was aiming to develop biodegradable orally dissolving strips (ODSs) of TML for treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG)."( Reduction of intraocular pressure using timolol orally dissolving strips in the treatment of induced primary open-angle glaucoma in rabbits.
Ahmed, KA; Al-Sawahli, MM; Alolayan, EM; El-Feky, YA; El-Telbany, DFA; El-Telbany, RFA; Fayez, AM; Mostafa, DA; Zakaria, S, 2020
)
0.56
"Ocular bioavailability after eye drops administration is an important, but rarely determined, pharmacokinetic parameter."( Topical ocular pharmacokinetics and bioavailability for a cocktail of atenolol, timolol and betaxolol in rabbits.
Del Amo, EM; Fayyaz, A; Gardner, I; Jamei, M; Puranen, J; Ranta, VP; Ruponen, M; Toropainen, E; Urtti, A; Valtari, A; Vellonen, KS, 2020
)
0.56
" This device can provide a simple, noninvasive, extended drug release up to 45 days with higher bioavailability and lower risk for adverse effects."( Soft Contact Lens with Embedded Microtubes for Sustained and Self-Adaptive Drug Delivery for Glaucoma Treatment.
Ben-Shlomo, G; Ding, X; Que, L, 2020
)
0.56
" However, the bioavailability of eye drops is low (<5%)."( Lollipop-Inspired Multilayered Drug Delivery Hydrogel for Dual Effective, Long-Term, and NIR-Defined Glaucoma Treatment.
Huang, J; Ma, F; Pang, Y; Song, Y; Wang, F; Wang, X; Wang, Y; Wu, B; Zhang, W; Zhang, X; Zhu, Z, 2021
)
0.62
" Low bioavailability and high frequency of administration in eye drops are major challenges in ocular pharmacotherapy."( Synthesis and evaluation of modified lens using plasma treatment containing timolol-maleate loaded lauric acid-decorated chitosan-alginate nanoparticles for glaucoma.
Alemezadeh, SA; Bagherzadeh, K; Hosseini, MS; Mehravi, B; Mirzaei, M; Mohseni, M; Naseripour, M, 2023
)
0.91

Dosage Studied

Timogel® preservative-free dosed once every morning has a 24-hour hypotensive effect with a better safety profile than timolol 0. fixed combination latanoprost/timolol administered once daily is both more effective and better tolerated than twice daily dosing with UFC brimonidine/ Timolol.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Both timolol and acebutolol had a significant hypotensive effect at 24 hours and a low incidence of side effects, suggesting that further increases in dosage might be effective and well tolerated."( Randomised study of six beta-blockers and a thiazide diuretic in essential hypertension.
Wilcox, RG, 1978
)
0.26
" Heart rates at rest were 91 and 98 beats/min in the patients with low and high digoxin dosage and rose to 135 and 139 beats/min, respectively, during exercise."( Inefficacy of digitalis in the control of heart rate in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: beneficial effect of an added beta adrenergic blocking agent.
David, D; Kaplinsky, E; Klein, HO; Segni, ED, 1979
)
0.26
" The dosage regimen calculations for patients indicated to receive the treatment for certain chronic diseases, should be determined by utilizing the disposition data obtained in steady-state conditions."( Pharmacokinetic differences between single and multiple oral dosing with the guidance for beta-adrenoceptor blockade assessment.
Ishizaki, T; Tawara, K, 1979
)
0.26
"21 patients with essential sustained mild or moderate hypertension were treated with timolol for an average of 6 months at a mean dosage of 3,14 tablets per day."( [A treatment of mild and moderate hypertension with timolol (author's transl)].
Fritel, D,
)
0.13
"001), but a major determinant of the magnitude of the decrease was the dosage change of the timolol."( Serum potassium and uric acid changes during treatment with timolol alone and in combination with a diuretic.
Mikkelsen, E; Pedersen, OL, 1979
)
0.26
" Propranolol and timolol produced a dose-dependent increase of atrial and atrioventricular nodal refractory periods; dose-response curves were parallel."( Effects of the beta-adrenergic blocking agents propranolol and timolol on canine cardiac refractory periods.
Cheymol, G; Heckle, J; Jaillon, P; Weissenburger, J, 1979
)
0.26
"A single-dose kinetic study of oral timolol, 20 mg, was undertaken in 3 groups of volunteers with varying degrees of renal function--(1) 10 normal subjects (N); (2) 9 patients with moderate chronic renal insufficiency (MCRI; C cr, 20 to 50 ml/min); (3) 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD)--to assess the need for dosage modification as renal function diminishes."( Timolol kinetics in chronic renal insufficiency.
Affrime, MB; Busby, P; Kim, KE; Lowenthal, DT; Nancarrow, J; Onesti, G; Pitone, JM; Shirk, J; Swartz, CD, 1978
)
0.26
" Although the range of mean timolol concentrations at steady state varies to a certain extent among different patients, the dosage regimens for patients who will receive treatment for certain chronic disease states (e."( Clinical pharmacologic observations on timolol. II. Antihypertensive effect and kinetic disposition on twice-daily dosing in patients with mild or moderate hypertension.
Ishizaki, T; Nakaya, H; Oyama, Y; Tawara, K,
)
0.13
" The average total daily dosage schedule for timolol ranged between 15 and 20 mg, with the same blood pressure lowering effect whether the divided dose was given twice or three times."( [The anti-hypertensive effect of timolol maleate (blocadren) in gradated combination with a diuretic].
Vorburger, C, 1976
)
0.26
" The optimal dose should be determined on a case-by-case basis, by increasing the daily dosage gradually."( [Beta-blockers and migraine].
Bousser, MG; Massiou, H, 1992
)
0.28
" Airway response was measured as change in FEV1 and sGaw and dose-response curves to timolol, BPPA and placebo were performed."( Assessment of bronchial effects following topical administration of butylamino-phenoxy-propanol-acetate, an oculoselective beta-adrenoceptor blocker in asthmatic subjects.
Bauer, KG; Binkowitz, B; Brunner-Ferber, F; Distlerath, LM; Kaik, GA; Lippa, EA; Till, P, 1992
)
0.28
" More patients on hydrochlorothiazide attained a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mmHg while less patients required doubling of dosage compared to timolol and enalapril."( The efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide, timolol and enalapril in Ethiopians with essential hypertension.
Habte, B, 1992
)
0.28
" For timolol, nasolacrimal occlusion collapsed the dose-response curve and extended the duration of action."( Therapeutic index of pilocarpine, carbachol, and timolol with nasolacrimal occlusion.
Fuqua, M; Nardin, GF; Sharir, M; Zimmerman, TJ, 1992
)
0.28
" Moreover, the possible influence of dosing time on the extent of ocular and systemic drug absorption must be considered when planning dosing schedules for topically applied ophthalmic drugs."( Improving the ocular to systemic ratio of topical timolol by varying the dosing time.
Grass, GM; Lee, VH; Ohdo, S, 1991
)
0.28
"In an attempt to increase patient compliance with a dosing regimen, prescriptions for topical solutions of glaucoma medication were refilled using the C Cap, a memory aid designed to help patients to remember to instill the medication as prescribed."( Effectiveness of the C Cap in promoting prescription refill compliance among patients with glaucoma.
Chin, A; Gill, MA; Nakahiro, RK; Okamoto, MP; Sclar, DA; Skaer, TL,
)
0.13
" Whether dose reduction will lead to reduced corneal toxicity in glaucoma filtration surgery following topical or subconjunctival dosing is an interesting therapeutic opportunity that remains to be determined."( Corneal penetration of 5-fluorouracil and its improvement by prodrug derivatization in the albino rabbit: implication in glaucoma filtration surgery.
Bundgaard, H; Buur, A; Lee, VH; Wang, W, 1991
)
0.28
"The ratio between ocular and systemic drug concentrations describes the relative safety of ophthalmic dosage forms of the same drug in terms of its systemic side effects."( Effects of epinephrine pretreatment and solution pH on ocular and systemic absorption of ocularly applied timolol in rabbits.
Kyyrönen, K; Urtti, A, 1990
)
0.28
" A dose-response relationship for D-timolol could be established."( Effects of D-timolol and L-timolol eye drops on intraocular pressure and aqueous flow. A dose-response study in normal eyes.
Alm, A; Koskela, T; Taarnhøj, J, 1990
)
0.28
" The dose-response curves of the strips from both strains for alpha-adrenoceptor stimulation with NA determined after pretreatment with CTX were comparable to those determined in the absence of timolol."( Role of stimulatory GTP-binding protein (Gs) in reduced beta-adrenoceptor coupling in the femoral artery of spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Asano, M; Masuzawa, K; Matsuda, T, 1988
)
0.27
" Based on the amount of timolol in the residual ointment, 50-60% of the original timolol dosage was delivered from the patch."( Initial evaluation of transdermal timolol: serum concentrations and beta-blockade.
Bondi, JV; Dunlay, MC; Ferguson, RK; Hichens, M; Loper, AE; Ribeiro, LG; Rotmensch, HH; Vlasses, PH,
)
0.13
" Dose-response relationships of pilocarpine and timolol to lower intraocular pressure were demonstrated with this model."( Microvascular access to the uveal tract in the rabbit eye for ocular pharmacologic studies.
Chiou, FY; Chiou, GC; Li, BH; Ruiz-Razura, A, 1989
)
0.28
"The classical approach of displacing the dose-response curve by an alpha adrenoceptor blocker has most often failed to demonstrate a contribution of an alpha adrenoceptor-mediated component in the final inotropic response to norepinephrine unless the beta adrenoceptors are extensively blocked."( Both alpha and beta adrenoceptor-mediated components contribute to final inotropic response to norepinephrine in rat heart.
Osnes, JB; Schiander, IG; Skomedal, T, 1988
)
0.27
" If standard doses of beta-blockers are used in PM subjects, they may be susceptible to concentration-related adverse reactions and they may also require lower and less frequent dosing for control of angina pectoris."( Oxidation phenotype and the metabolism and action of beta-blockers.
Lennard, MS, 1985
)
0.27
" The extent of bronchial beta-adrenoceptor blockade following one eyedrop in each eye of timolol 1% and L-714,465 1% was compared in six normal subjects, by measuring the displacement of the bronchodilator dose-response curve to isoprenaline following each drug compared to the isoprenaline dose-response curve after placebo eyedrops (methyl-cellulose)."( Bronchial beta-adrenoceptor blockade following eyedrops of timolol and its isomer L-714,465 in normal subjects.
Richards, R; Tattersfield, AE, 1985
)
0.27
" If standard doses of beta-blockers are used in poor metabolisers, these subjects may be susceptible to concentration-related adverse reactions and they may also require less frequent dosing for control of angina pectoris."( The polymorphic oxidation of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations.
Lennard, MS; Tucker, GT; Woods, HF,
)
0.13
" If standard doses of some beta-blockers are used in poor metabolizers, these patients may be susceptible to concentration-related adverse reactions and they may also require lower and less frequent dosing for control of angina pectoris."( Debrisoquine polymorphism and the metabolism and action of metoprolol, timolol, propranolol and atenolol.
Lennard, MS; Silas, JH; Tucker, GT; Woods, HF, 1986
)
0.27
" Airway dose-response curves to timolol (0-2%), L-714,465 (0-4%), and placebo (methyl cellulose) eye drops were performed in a double-blind randomised study in which airway response was measured as change in FEV1 and specific airway conductance (sGaw)."( Comparison of the airway response to eye drops of timolol and its isomer L-714,465 in asthmatic subjects.
Richards, R; Tattersfield, AE, 1987
)
0.27
" The mean times to AR and D were not significantly increased by either dosing regimen of timolol, although the trend was for an increase in the time to D after 7 days of timolol and an increase in the time to AR and D after 14 days of timolol."( The effect of acute and chronic administration of timolol on cardiac sympathetic neural discharge, arrhythmia, and beta adrenergic receptor density associated with coronary occlusion in the cat.
Lathers, CM; Lerner, JP; Levin, RM; Spivey, WH; Suter, LE; Tumer, N, 1986
)
0.27
" To investigate the role of adrenergic mechanisms in regulating flow, the dose-response effect of topical timolol (0."( Aqueous humor flow measured with fluorophotometry in timolol-treated primates.
Bartels, SP, 1988
)
0.27
" Subjects in whom the sinus rhythm returned or the ventricular rate decreased to less than 100 bpm were transferred to a dosing regimen of timolol in 10-mg tablets twice a day by mouth, 1 hr after the last intravenous dose."( Antiarrhythmic effects of intravenous timolol in supraventricular arrhythmias.
Moncloa, F; Sweany, AE; Vickers, FF; Zupkis, RV, 1985
)
0.27
" This evidence suggests that timolol is as effective in dosage of 20 mg taken once daily as half the dose taken twice daily in the symptom management of angina pectoris."( Once daily timolol in the prophylaxis of angina pectoris.
Given-Wilson, R; Joy, M, 1985
)
0.27
" and strict adjustment of dosage is recommended."( [Evaluation of the systemic effects of timolol maleate in eye drops].
Dufier, JL; Hugues, FC; Le Jeunne, C; Munera, Y, 1985
)
0.27
" 2 They were treated with once-daily timolol and followed up at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks when dosage was titrated against BP control (indirect measurement) and degree of beta-adrenoceptor antagonism (submaximal bicycle ergometry and sub-lingual GTN)."( Control of blood pressure and reduction of echocardiographically assessed left ventricular mass with one-daily timolol.
Glover, DR; Littler, WA; Rowlands, DB; Stallard, TJ, 1982
)
0.26
" 2 Maximal suppression of exercise-induced tachycardia (bicycle ergometry) was dose-dependent and greater at 2 than at 6 h after dosing; activity up to 12 h was evident on the last dosing day."( Relationships among timolol doses, plasma concentrations and beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity.
Abrams, WB; Demetriades, J; Ferguson, RK; Holmes, GI; Huber, P; Koplin, JR; Vlasses, PH, 1982
)
0.26
" The dosage of timolol was 10 mg twice daily and the patients were followed for 12--33 months (mean 17 months)."( Timolol-related reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients ages 65-75 years surviving acute myocardial infarction. Prepared for the Norwegian Multicentre Study Group.
Abrahamsen, AM; Gundersen, T; Kjekshus, J; Rønnevik, PK, 1982
)
0.26
" These differences account for many of the observed variations in drug action and dosage scheduling as well as for some of the side effects."( Beta-adrenergic blockers. Choosing among them.
McGoon, MD; Vlietstra, RE, 1984
)
0.27
" Furthermore, dose-response studies, using direct systemic administration of the two beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, revealed that ICI 118,551 is about 60 times less potent than timolol in blocking isoprenaline-induced cardio-acceleration."( ICI 118,551: an effective ocular hypotensive agent with selectivity for the ciliary process beta 2-adrenoceptor and with minimal cardiac side effects.
Nathanson, JA, 1984
)
0.27
"Timolol, a non selective beta-blocker was used one daily at a dosage of 10 to 20 mg, in 60 hypertensive patients with a diastolic blood pressure ranging from 100 to 120 mmHg."( [Monotherapy of hypertension with a beta-blocker in a single daily dose (author's transl)].
Gilgenkrantz, JM; Languillat, JM; Zannad, F,
)
0.13
" Neither timolol (a nonselective beta-antagonist) nor atenolol (a beta 1-selective antagonist) had a significant effect on basal secretory rate, but both shifted the isoproterenol dose-response curve to the right without changing its slope, suggesting competitive antagonism."( Evidence that beta 1-adrenoceptor activation mediates isoproterenol-stimulated renin secretion in the rat.
Churchill, MC; Churchill, PC; McDonald, FD, 1983
)
0.27
" A similar study was carried out with 12 patients taking propranolol for various cardiovascular problems; their dosage of this agent was not varied, however."( Effect of timolol eye drops in subjects receiving systemic propranolol therapy.
Blondeau, P; Côté, M; Tétrault, L, 1983
)
0.27
" The dosage of timolol was 10 mg twice daily and the follow-up period was 12-33 mo (mean: 17 mo)."( Timolol treatment after myocardial infarction in diabetic patients.
Gundersen, T; Kjekshus, J,
)
0.13
"An open, multi-centre study was carried out in general practice to compare the efficacy and tolerance of antihypertensive therapy with once-daily and twice-daily dosage of a fixed ratio combination of hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg), amiloride (2."( Comparison of a fixed ratio combination of hydrochlorothiazide, amiloride and timolol ('Moducren') given once versus twice daily in mild to moderate hypertension.
Currie, WJ; Isitt, VL; VandenBurg, MJ; Young, JH, 1984
)
0.27
" At the concentration and dosage employed here there was no significant difference between the hypotensive effects of timolol and TFM."( The effects of separate and combined topical treatment with timolol maleate and trifluormethazolamide on the intraocular pressure in normal rabbits.
Bar-Ilan, A, 1984
)
0.27
" Both NLO and eyelid closure seem to be safe, simple, and effective procedures that could minimize dosage requirements, as well as side effects."( Improving the therapeutic index of topically applied ocular drugs.
Kandarakis, AS; Kooner, KS; Ziegler, LP; Zimmerman, TJ, 1984
)
0.27
" If patients failed to respond adequately at this dosage level, prazosin (0."( Timolol/bendrofluazide combination ('Prestim') in the treatment of poorly controlled hypertensive patients in general practice.
Douglas-Jones, AP, 1984
)
0.27
" The results showed that the change in treatment led to a significant reduction in blood pressure in both groups, at a dosage of 1 tablet daily in over half the patients, and the majority (88%) preferred the new form of treatment."( A general practice study of timolol/hydrochlorothiazide/amiloride ('Moducren'), a new therapy for hypertension, and the doctor's influence on management.
Arr, S; Parry, EE; Tait, D, 1983
)
0.27
" We can look forward to newer agents that are efficacious as monotherapy and on a daily or twice daily dosage regimen for the treatment of the vast majority of hypertensive patients."( Newer antihypertensive agents.
Thind, GS, 1980
)
0.26
" In the remaining 19 patients, intraocular pressure was controlled well over the entire two-year period, but in some cases it was necessary after a while to increase the dosage to a higher concentration."( [Results of long-term treatment of glaucoma with timolol ophthalmic solution (author's transl)].
Merkle, W; Merté, HJ, 1980
)
0.26
" Side effects reported were correlated with dosage levels and estimated plasma levels."( Potential side effects of timolol therapy in the treatment of glaucoma.
Golob, DS; Leader, BJ; Zimmerman, TJ, 1981
)
0.26
" Recording of intraocular pressure during the trial suggested the presence of a dose-response relationship between the dose of timolol and the decrease of intraocular pressure."( Dose response of oral timolol combined with adrenaline.
Ohrström, A, 1982
)
0.26
" The patient groups were then crossed over to the other dosage interval."( Additive effect of epinephrine to timolol therapy in primary open angle glaucoma.
Cyrlin, MN; Epstein, DL; Thomas, JV, 1982
)
0.26
"6%) patients who required a dosage reduction and 2 (0."( A multi-centre general practice study on the use of a timolol/bendrofluazide combination ('Prestim') in the management of hypertension: preliminary report.
Head, AC; Langrick, AF, 1981
)
0.26
" In patients as well as in normal subjects, the data indicated considerable beta-blocking effects for both drugs at the end of a 12-hourly dosing schedule, suggesting that twice-daily timolol and propranolol may be clinically practical."( Plasma timolol levels and systolic time intervals.
Chew, C; Collett, J; Singh, BN; Whitlock, RM; Williams, FM, 1980
)
0.26
" In a complementary investigation, 14 patients who completed the 16-weeks' treatment were changed onto a regimen in which the drug dosage remained unchanged but was taken on a once-daily basis for a further 16 weeks to assess the efficacy of once-daily dosing and to monitor any further long-term changes in biochemistry."( A hospital out-patient study of timolol/bendrofluazide combination ('Prestim') in essential hypertension.
Kubik, MM, 1980
)
0.26
"5% timolol maleate twice daily for at least 4 weeks and who had 8 AM IOPs of at least 22 mm Hg and no greater than 30 mm Hg 12 hours after dosing were eligible for the study."( The efficacy of apraclonidine as an adjunct to timolol therapy. Apraclonidine Adjunctive Therapy Study Group.
Lehmann, RP; Ritch, R; Shin, DH; Shrader, CE; Stewart, WC; van Buskirk, EM, 1995
)
0.29
"05% dipivefrin every 12 hours might be an adequate dosage for maximal effect."( Nasolacrimal occlusion improves the therapeutic index of antiglaucoma medications.
Sharir, M; Zimmerman, TJ, 1994
)
0.29
" A better understanding of the mechanisms involved in transcorneal permeation could lead to improvements in drug dosage forms or the development of drug delivery devices which enhance the ocular bioavailability of drugs."( Theoretical corneal permeation model for ionizable drugs.
Cheng, YL; Friedrich, SW; Saville, BA, 1993
)
0.29
" Interaction between topical isoprenaline and timolol on intraocular pressure was studied in conscious rabbits through changes of the dose-response curves."( Evidence for a synergistic interaction between isoprenaline and timolol on intraocular pressure in conscious rabbits.
Garrido, M; Martinez de Ibarreta, MJ; Pablo, V; Santafe, J; Segarra, J, 1993
)
0.29
"To develop methods for constructing a pharmacokinetic model to predict the time course of aqueous humor and plasma drug concentrations after topical dosage in rabbits using the simulation program iThink (formerly STELLA; High Performance Systems, Lyme, NH)."( A model to predict aqueous humor and plasma pharmacokinetics of ocularly applied drugs.
Grass, GM; Lee, VH, 1993
)
0.29
" Dosing was twice daily."( Timolol hemihydrate vs timolol maleate to treat ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.
Bahr, RL; DuBiner, HB; Gunn, R; Hill, R; Hurvitz, LM; Kaufman, H; Keates, EU; Mandell, AI; Mundorf, TK; Ropo, A; Sassani, JW; Schwartz, LW; Starita, RJ; Stewart, WC; Towey, AW; Zimmerman, TJ, 1996
)
0.29
"To investigate the efficacy and dose-response relationship of three concentrations (0."( A six-week dose-response study of the ocular hypotensive effect of dorzolamide with a one-year extension. Dorzolamide Dose-Response Study Group.
Strahlman, E; Tipping, R; Vogel, R, 1996
)
0.29
"5% timolol 8 hours after dosing on days 1, 30, and 90; and a significant difference (P < ."( A 90-day study of the efficacy and side effects of 0.25% and 0.5% apraclonidine vs 0.5% timolol. Apraclonidine Primary Therapy Study Group.
Horwitz, B; Kottler, M; Laibovitz, R; Ritch, R; Stewart, RH; Stewart, WC, 1996
)
0.29
"The objective of the present study was to determine the basis for dosing time-dependent changes in the ocular and systemic absorption of topically applied timolol in pigmented rabbits."( Basis for dosing time-dependent changes in the ocular and systemic absorption of topically applied timolol.
Balant, L; Gex-Fabry, M; Gurny, R; Lee, VH; Martenet, M; Ohdo, S; Podder, SK; Sintzel, MB; Yamahara, H, 1996
)
0.29
" Dose-response curves were fitted with a nonlinear regression microcomputer programme."( A complex interaction between topical verapamil and timolol on intraocular pressure in conscious rabbits.
Garrido, M; Martínez de Ibarreta, MJ; Melena, J; Santafé, J; Segarra, J, 1996
)
0.29
"005%, once-a-day dosing of latanoprost is highly effective in significantly reducing intraocular pressure, causing only minimal, clinically acceptable short-term ocular side effects."( Clinical dose-regimen studies with latanoprost, a new ocular hypotensive PGF2 alpha analogue.
Diestelhorst, M; Krieglstein, GK; Lusky, M; Nagasubramanian, S, 1997
)
0.3
"055 nmol from the dose-response curve."( Central regulation of urine production by a selective mu-opioid agonist, [D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4, Gly5-ol]-enkephalin, in rats.
Matsuda, T; Mori, M; Tsushima, H, 1997
)
0.3
"5% are highly effective in lowering intraocular pressure when measured at the end of the dosing interval."( Efficacy of carteolol hydrochloride 1% vs timolol maleate 0.5% in patients with increased intraocular pressure. Nocturnal Investigation of Glaucoma Hemodynamics Trial Study Group.
Cohen, JS; Netland, PA; Nussbaum, LL; Stewart, WC; Weiss, H, 1997
)
0.3
" The only variation in method between the two studies was the dosage of 2% dorzolamide."( The efficacy and safety of dorzolamide as adjunctive therapy to timolol maleate gellan solution in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. Additivity Study Group.
Adamsons, I; Clineschmidt, C; Laibovitz, R; Polis, A; Shedden, A; Taylor, J, 1998
)
0.3
" Ninety-two percent of patients preferring timolol gel strongly agreed or agreed that once-daily dosing was a reason for their preference."( Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.
Gormley, G; Hartenbaum, D; Liss, C; Maloney, S; Schenker, H, 1999
)
0.3
"), when both are dosed once daily on the exercise performance."( Systemic beta-blockade with once daily Betimol or Timoptic-XE.
Cate, EA; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
" In patients under long-term therapy, the periocular tissue can accumulate a greater quantity of beta-antagonist than is present in a daily dosage of applied eyedrops, manyfold higher than the maximal intraocular concentration."( Periocular accumulation of timolol and betaxolol in glaucoma patients under long-term therapy.
Frenzel, H; Khuu, HD; Lam, KW; Sponsel, WE; Terry, S, 1999
)
0.3
"Phenylephrine dose-dependently contracted ciliary artery smooth muscle, and bunazosin (1 microM) shifted this dose-response curve to the right."( Effects of beta antagonists on mechanical properties in rabbit ciliary artery.
Hayashi, E; Hayashi-Morimoto, R; Ishikawa, H; Sato, Y; Yoshitomi, T, 1999
)
0.3
"To compare the 24-hour diurnal ocular hypotensive efficacy of two dosing regimens of latanoprost, once daily (8 AM or 10 PM), vs timolol maleate, twice daily."( Comparison of 24-hour intraocular pressure reduction with two dosing regimens of latanoprost and timolol maleate in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Gandi, S; Hudgins, AC; Konstas, AG; Maltezos, AC; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
"005% given at 8 AM or 10 PM for 1 month and then changed to the other dosing regimen for 1 month."( Comparison of 24-hour intraocular pressure reduction with two dosing regimens of latanoprost and timolol maleate in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Gandi, S; Hudgins, AC; Konstas, AG; Maltezos, AC; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
" When dosed according to labeling, latanoprost had the lowest cost of therapy at $0."( Daily cost of newer glaucoma agents.
Hudgins, AC; Pruitt, CA; Sine, C; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
" The peak level 2 hours after dosing for timolol hemihydate was 16."( Efficacy and safety of timolol solution once daily vs timolol gel added to latanoprost.
Day, DG; Dubiner, HB; Holmes, KT; Sharpe, ED; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 1999
)
0.3
"9 mm Hg with brinzolamide twice-daily dosing and -2."( The long-term safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1.0% (azopt) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The Brinzolamide Long-Term Therapy Study Group.
March, WF; Ochsner, KI, 2000
)
0.31
"Brinzolamide produced significant and equivalent reductions in intraocular pressure when dosed two and three times daily for 18 months."( The long-term safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1.0% (azopt) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The Brinzolamide Long-Term Therapy Study Group.
March, WF; Ochsner, KI, 2000
)
0.31
" The efficacy of this formulation in short-term studies using once-daily dosing has been reported."( Efficacy and tolerability of timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution versus timolol ophthalmic solution in adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a six-month, double-masked, multicenter study.
Laurence, J; Shedden, A; Tipping, R, 2001
)
0.31
" Twice-daily dosing of bimatoprost also provided significantly greater mean reductions in IOP than timolol at most time points but was not as effective as once-daily dosing."( Comparison of once- or twice-daily bimatoprost with twice-daily timolol in patients with elevated IOP : a 3-month clinical trial.
Brandt, JD; Chen, K; VanDenburgh, AM; Whitcup, SM, 2001
)
0.31
" Each treatment period consisted of 6 weeks of chronic dosing followed by a diurnal curve for the intraocular pressure measured at 08:00, 10:00, 16:00, 18:00, 20:00, 22:00, and 24:00 hours."( Brimonidine 0.2% given two or three times daily versus timolol maleate 0.5% in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Holmes, KT; Konstas, AG; Stangos, NT; Stewart, WC; Tersis, I; Topouzis, F, 2001
)
0.31
" BID dosing of bimatoprost also provided significantly greater mean IOP reductions than timolol at most timepoints, but was not as effective as QD dosing."( Six-month comparison of bimatoprost once-daily and twice-daily with timolol twice-daily in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.
Brandt, J; Sherwood, M, 2001
)
0.31
"The objective of this study was to compare plasma concentrations of timolol following multiple dosing of the therapeutic regimens of timolol maleate ophthalmic gel-forming solution (Timolol GS; TIMOPTIC-XE) and timolol maleate ophthalmic solution."( Plasma timolol concentrations of timolol maleate: timolol gel-forming solution (TIMOPTIC-XE) once daily versus timolol maleate ophthalmic solution twice daily.
Barrish, A; Laurence, J; Olah, TV; Shedden, AH, 2001
)
0.31
"Subjects who qualified at screening began a run-in period dosing timolol twice daily for 3 weeks."( Evaluation of travoprost as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled intraocular pressure while using timolol 0.5%.
Davis, AA; Landry, T; Orengo-Nania, S; Silver, LH; Von Tress, M; Weiner, A, 2001
)
0.31
" A clear dose-response relationship exists in all ocular tissues studied after an intraperitoneal dose of timolol."( Timolol concentrations in rat ocular tissues and plasma after topical and intraperitoneal dosing.
Archibald, ML; Chauhan, BC; Kelly, ME; LeVatte, TL; Tan, AY; Tremblay, F, 2002
)
0.31
" Good linearity, precision and selectivity were found, and the proposed methods were applied successfully to the pharmaceutical dosage from containing the above-mentioned drug combination without any interference by the excipients."( Simultaneous determination of dorzolamide HCL and timolol maleate in eye drops by two different spectroscopic methods.
Erk, N, 2002
)
0.31
" The reduction in IOP was maintained throughout the 24-hour dosage interval."( Topical bimatoprost: a review of its use in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Easthope, SE; Perry, CM, 2002
)
0.31
"1 mm Hg) dosed latanoprost/timolol maleate compared with timolol maleate given twice daily (21."( A comparison of once-daily morning vs evening dosing of concomitant latanoprost/timolol.
Konstas, AG; Lallos, NA; Leech, JN; Nakos, E; Stewart, WC; Tersis, I, 2002
)
0.31
"The subjects in this prospective, double-masked, crossover comparison were dosed 15 min prior to treadmill testing."( Cardiovascular effects of timolol maleate, brimonidine or brimonidine/timolol maleate in concomitant therapy.
Jackson, AL; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2002
)
0.31
"Rates of medication discontinuation reflect factors including effectiveness, tolerability, cost, and dosing frequency."( Discontinuation rates of topical glaucoma medications in a managed care population.
Cho, J; Mullins, CD; Shaya, FT; Wong, W, 2002
)
0.31
" The diurnal intraocular pressure as well as the 08:00 trough and +2 hour post dosing pressures were statistically equal between groups, although a trend to a lower mean pressure was observed in the TXE (17."( The safety and efficacy of timolol 0.5% in xanthan gum versus timolol gel forming solution 0.5%.
Hott, CE; Sharpe, ED; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2002
)
0.31
"TXE demonstrates a lower intraocular pressure eight hours after dosing than does TXG, but safety appears similar between products."( The safety and efficacy of timolol 0.5% in xanthan gum versus timolol gel forming solution 0.5%.
Hott, CE; Sharpe, ED; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC, 2002
)
0.31
"25% drops in twice daily dosage and does not result in any significant ocular and systemic adverse effects."( A prospective, long-term, randomized study of the efficacy and safety of the drug combination pilocarpine 1% with clonidine 0.06% or clonidine 0.125% versus timolol 0.25%.
Agarwal, H; Rajashekhar, YL; Sihota, R; Venkatesh, P, 2002
)
0.31
"3%) mainly because of its once daily dosing (P < 0001)."( The efficacy and safety of the timolol/dorzolamide fixed combination vs latanoprost in exfoliation glaucoma.
Konstas, AG; Kozobolis, VP; Leech, J; Stewart, WC; Tersis, I, 2003
)
0.32
"005% lasts for up to 24 hours after a single topical dose, which allows for a once-daily dosage regimen."( Latanoprost : an update of its use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Culy, CR; Ibbotson, T; McGavin, JK; Perry, CM, 2003
)
0.32
"Intravenous dosing was initially done via jugular cannula."( Iontophoretic in vivo transdermal delivery of beta-blockers in hairless rats and reduced skin irritation by liposomal formulation.
Banga, AK; Betageri, GV; Chaturvedula, A; Conjeevaram, R; Sunkara, G, 2003
)
0.32
" Once-a-day dosing with timolol + latanoprost has not been compared with a betablocker + pilocarpine combination."( Timolol + latanoprost: new preparation. Last-resort eye drops.
, 2003
)
0.32
" Due to the unique mechanism of action of latanoprost, once-daily dosing of one drop of FC latanoprost/timolol results in additional IOP reduction compared with either drug administered separately."( An evaluation of the fixed-combination of latanoprost and timolol for use in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Feldman, RM, 2004
)
0.32
"Fixed combination latanoprost/timolol administered once daily is both more effective and better tolerated than twice daily dosing with UFC brimonidine/timolol."( A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with the unfixed combination of brimonidine and timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure. A six month, evaluator masked, multicentre study in Europe.
Cunliffe, I; García-Sánchez, J; Landry, J; Pajic, B; Rouland, JF; Spiegel, D; Traverso, C, 2004
)
0.32
"005% dosed once in the evening."( A comparison of the effects of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.
Harris, A; Janulevicienë, I; Kagemann, L; McCranor, L; Siesky, B, 2004
)
0.32
"In previous analyses of primary efficacy data from two randomized clinical trials, standard dosing regimens of the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (COSOPT) and latanoprost (XALATAN) were shown to have equivalent efficacy with regard to reduction in mean daytime diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP)."( Efficacy of the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost in the treatment of ocular hypertension or glaucoma: combined analysis of pooled data from two large randomized observer and patient-masked studies.
Adamsons, IA; Fechtner, RD; Lines, CR; McCarroll, KA, 2005
)
0.33
"A prospective, observer-masked, crossover, active-controlled, randomized comparison in which after a 6-week medicine-free period, patients were randomized to either latanoprost-timolol-fixed combination therapy or latanoprost therapy, both dosed once each evening, alone for 8 weeks."( Twenty-four-hour control with latanoprost-timolol-fixed combination therapy vs latanoprost therapy.
Boboridis, K; Jenkins, JN; Kallinderis, K; Konstas, AG; Stewart, WC; Tzetzi, D, 2005
)
0.33
" This study demonstrates that the fixed combination of travoprost/timolol produces significant and clinically relevant reductions of IOP in a once-daily dosing regimen."( Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution once daily for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Bergamini, MV; Henry, JC; Katz, GJ; Landry, TA; Lewis, RA; Mallick, S; Robertson, SM; Schuman, JS; Sullivan, EK; Wells, DT, 2005
)
0.33
" IOP was assessed pre-dose and 2 hours after morning dosing at weeks 2, 6, and 12."( 12-week study comparing the fixed combination of brimonidine and timolol with concomitant use of the individual components in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Goñi, FJ,
)
0.13
" Its simplified dosing regimen has the potential to improve compliance."( 12-week study comparing the fixed combination of brimonidine and timolol with concomitant use of the individual components in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
Goñi, FJ,
)
0.13
"A retrospective, comparative, parallel group study was conducted on 78 eligible patients diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma who received topical timolol gel-forming solution either on morning (AM dosing group; 39 patients) or evening (PM dosing group; 39 patients) as monotherapy treatment."( The efficacy of timolol in gel-forming solution after morning or evening dosing in Asian glaucomatous patients.
Balaravi, P; Cheong, MT; Chieng, LL; Liza-Sharmini, AT; Ong, LB; Shin, HC; Vengadasalam, SR, 2005
)
0.33
" Morning dosing was more effective in lowering the IOP compared to evening dosing."( The efficacy of timolol in gel-forming solution after morning or evening dosing in Asian glaucomatous patients.
Balaravi, P; Cheong, MT; Chieng, LL; Liza-Sharmini, AT; Ong, LB; Shin, HC; Vengadasalam, SR, 2005
)
0.33
"5% ophthalmic solution dosed in the morning and evening."( A comparison of morning and evening instillation of a combination travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution.
Andrew, R; Denis, P; Friren, B; Wells, D,
)
0.13
"5% ophthalmic solution, dosed in the morning or evening, controlled IOP consistently throughout the day."( A comparison of morning and evening instillation of a combination travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution.
Andrew, R; Denis, P; Friren, B; Wells, D,
)
0.13
" The TRAV group (n = 29) dosed once daily at 9:00 PM while the DTFC group (n = 27) dosed twice daily at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM."( Comparison of the efficacy and safety of travoprost with a fixed-combination of dorzolamide and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Batista, WD; da Silva, LJ; Figueiredo, CR; Franklin, LM; Netto, JA; Suzuki, ER, 2006
)
0.33
" The steady-flow J of high, middle and low dosage groups of puerarin eye drops with borneol were increased by 49%, 32%, 5% respectively, and permeability parameter Kp increased by 49%, 32%, 5% respectively, as compared to that of the control group."( Promoting effect of borneol on the permeability of puerarin eye drops and timolol maleate eye drops through the cornea in vitro.
Guo, P; Hou, SX; Huang, QW; Qi, HY; Wu, CJ, 2006
)
0.33
"After a medicine-free period, qualified patients were randomized to either placebo dosed in the morning with a latanoprost-timolol fixed combination dosed in the evening or timolol alone dosed twice daily for 8 weeks."( 24-Hour control with a latanoprost-timolol fixed combination vs timolol alone.
Economou, AI; Jenkins, JN; Kaltsos, K; Konstas, AG; Lake, S; Stewart, WC, 2006
)
0.33
"Qualified patients at Visit 1 were placed on travoprost dosed every evening for 4 weeks and then were randomized at baseline (Visit 2) to the addition of timolol maleate or brinzolamide each given twice daily."( The efficacy and safety of timolol maleate versus brinzolamide each given twice daily added to travoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma.
Berta, A; Chiselita, D; Cvenkel, B; Holló, G; Izgi, B; Liehneova, I; Petkova, N; Stewart, WC; Szaflik, J; Turacli, E,
)
0.13
"5% ophthalmic solution (Lat/Tim), dosed once daily in the morning, in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OH)."( A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Andrew, R; Danesh-Meyer, H; Kozobolis, V; Melamed, S; Topouzis, F; Wells, AP; Wells, D; Wieland, H,
)
0.13
"To evaluate the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) control of brimonidine/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) versusthe unfixed combination of its individual components, each dosed twice daily, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension."( Twenty-four-hour efficacy of the brimonidine/timolol fixed combination versus therapy with the unfixed components.
Georgiadou, I; Kaltsos, K; Katsimpris, IE; Konstas, AG; Kordelou, A; Nelson, LA; Stewart, WC, 2008
)
0.35
" Patients then began DTFC dosed at 08."( Success rates for switching to dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination in timolol responders who are insufficiently controlled by latanoprost monotherapy.
Henry, JC; Nelson, LA; Sharpe, ED; Sonty, S; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC; Weiss, MJ, 2008
)
0.35
" Treatment with a fixed combination may, therefore, increase compliance as a result of simplifying the dosage regimen."( Efficacy and safety of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination in the treatment of glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Martinez, A; Sanchez, M, 2008
)
0.35
"Both morning and evening dosing of LTFC were effective in lowering diurnal IOP in patients with POAG."( Comparison of intraocular pressure lowering effect of once daily morning vs evening dosing of latanoprost/timolol maleate combination.
Aşik, S; Can, I; Gurdal, C; Kürkçüoğlu, P; Takmaz, T,
)
0.13
"5%, dosed twice daily and were followed up while receiving therapy for 6 months."( Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination compared with brinzolamide 1% and timolol 0.5%.
Arzeno, G; Bergamini, MV; Dickerson, JE; Hua, SY; James, JE; Kaback, M; Landry, TA; Salem, C; Scoper, SV, 2008
)
0.35
"To compare the 12-hour efficacy and safety of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) dosed twice daily versus latanoprost dosed every evening following a timolol run-in in primary open-angle glaucoma patients."( Comparison of daytime efficacy and safety of dorzolamide/timolol maleate fixed combination versus latanoprost.
Ahmad, A; Mulaney, J; Sonty, S; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC,
)
0.13
" Patients randomised to bimatoprost twice daily had been switched to bimatoprost once daily dosing at month 24 (bimatoprost twice daily/once daily treatment group), and continued with once daily dosing through month 48 (n = 39)."( Long-term efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for intraocular pressure lowering in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: year 4.
Batoosingh, AL; Cohen, JS; Gross, RL; Liu, CC; Safyan, E; Williams, RD, 2008
)
0.35
" Patients with an IOP of 22-29 mmHg inclusive at 8 AMwere randomized to either bimatoprost dosed each evening or DTFC twice-daily."( A comparison of dorzolamide/timolol-fixed combination versus bimatoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma who are poorly controlled on latanoprost.
Nelson, LA; Sharpe, ED; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC; Williams, RD, 2008
)
0.35
"To evaluate the 24 h efficacy and safety of the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (TTFC) versus travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma patients."( Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure control with the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination compared with travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, D; Ntampos, KS; Stewart, WC, 2009
)
0.35
"This study suggests that when both drugs are dosed in the evening the TTFC provides improved intraocular pressure reduction, compared with travoprost, over the 24 h curve and for each individual time point in primary open-angle glaucoma patients."( Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure control with the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination compared with travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, D; Ntampos, KS; Stewart, WC, 2009
)
0.35
" Patients were then treated with the opposite dosing regimen for 8 weeks and IOP measurements were repeated."( Intraocular pressure control over 24 hours using travoprost and timolol fixed combination administered in the morning or evening in primary open-angle and exfoliative glaucoma.
Konstas, AG; Nasr, MB; Nelson, LA; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC; Tsironi, S; Vakalis, AN, 2009
)
0.35
"Both morning and evening administration of TTFC provide effective 24-hour IOP reduction, but evening dosing demonstrates better 24-hour pressure control."( Intraocular pressure control over 24 hours using travoprost and timolol fixed combination administered in the morning or evening in primary open-angle and exfoliative glaucoma.
Konstas, AG; Nasr, MB; Nelson, LA; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC; Tsironi, S; Vakalis, AN, 2009
)
0.35
"Of the 437 patients enrolled, 220 dosed Brinz/Tim whereas 217 dosed Dorz/Tim twice daily."( The safety and efficacy of brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination versus dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Aung, T; Chew, P; Coote, MA; Denis, P; Filatori, I; James, J; Laganovska, G; Manni, G; Orengo-Nania, S; Sharpe, ED; Volksone, L; Zeyen, T,
)
0.13
"Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with normal blood pressure were randomized to LTFC, dosed each evening, or timolol dosed twice daily in a cross-over design for 8 weeks and the opposite medicine for 8 weeks."( 24-hour intraocular pressure and blood pressure levels with latanoprost/timolol fixed combination versus timolol.
Konstas, AG; Kozobolis, VP; Lasaridis, AN; Mikropoulos, D; Nelson, LA; Pikilidou, MI; Sarafidis, PA; Stewart, WC; Tsironi, S, 2009
)
0.35
"Functional synergy between excipients in gellan gum formulations buffered with l-carnosine has potential for topical ocular dosage forms with sustained precorneal residence."( L-Carnosine: multifunctional dipeptide buffer for sustained-duration topical ophthalmic formulations.
Carreiro, ST; Chu, J; Collette Iii, WW; Gukasyan, HJ; Niesman, MR; Prasanna, G; Sartnurak, S; Singh, SR; Younis, HS, 2009
)
0.35
" For prostaglandins, dosing time was suggested in the morning by 18 (36%) ophthalmologists and in the evening by 24 (48%) (p=0."( Ophthalmologist attitudes regarding fixed combination treatment for glaucoma in the European Union.
Kruft, B; Nelson, LA; Stewart, JA; Stewart, WC,
)
0.13
"Both BTFC dosing regimens significantly reduce 24 h IOP in XFG compared with bimatoprost monotherapy."( Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure control with bimatoprost and the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination administered in the morning, or evening in exfoliative glaucoma.
Embeslidis, T; Georgiadou, I; Haidich, AB; Holló, G; Irkec, M; Konstas, AG; Melamed, S; Mikropoulos, D; Tsironi, S, 2010
)
0.36
" After topical dosing to the eye in a steroid induced mouse model of ocular hypertension, the compounds reduce intraocular pressure to baseline levels."( Novel class of LIM-kinase 2 inhibitors for the treatment of ocular hypertension and associated glaucoma.
Allen, J; Almstead, ZY; Courtney, LF; Crist, M; Crosson, CE; Gardyan, M; Gopinathan, S; Gu, KJ; Hamman, BD; Harrison, BA; Key, B; Kimball, SD; Liu, Q; Liu, Y; Mabon, R; McKnight, B; Patel, N; Rawlins, DB; Rice, DS; Voronkov, MV; Whitlock, NA; Wilson, AG; Yates, PW; Zhang, Y; Zhou, J, 2009
)
0.35
"To assess adherence in glaucoma patients using the Travatan Dosing Aid (TDA); to record differences in adherence by age, sex, therapy, systemic therapies, years from diagnosis, type of therapy and intraocular pressure (IOP)."( Monitoring adherence rates in glaucoma patients using the Travatan Dosing Aid. A 6-month study comparing patients on travoprost 0.004% and patients on travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination.
Bianchi, PE; Milano, G; Pasinetti, GM; Rossi, GC; Scudeller, L; Tinelli, C, 2010
)
0.36
" However, the fixed dosing may be a disadvantage in some cases."( Fixed combinations of dorzolamide-timolol and brimonidine-timolol in the management of glaucoma.
Katz, LJ; Razeghinejad, MR; Sawchyn, AK, 2010
)
0.36
"Application of timolol maleate (TM) in a conventional dosage form (solution) into the eye results in almost 80% of the instilled dose being lost either through spillage or due to drainage into the nasolacrimal duct."( Improved ocular absorption kinetics of timolol maleate loaded into a bioadhesive niosomal delivery system.
Aggarwal, D; Kakkar, S; Kaur, IP; Singh, H, 2010
)
0.36
"After up to a 6-week medicine-free period, XFG patients were randomized to either TTFC or LTFC for 3 months, dosed each evening, and then changed to the opposite treatment for another 3 months."( 24-h Intraocular pressure control with evening-dosed travoprost/timolol, compared with latanoprost/timolol, fixed combinations in exfoliative glaucoma.
Dimopoulos, AT; Embeslidis, TA; Haidich, AB; Konstas, AG; Mikropoulos, DG; Papanastasiou, A; Stewart, WC, 2010
)
0.36
"2%) and desire to simplify treatment with once-daily dosing (29."( Long-term effect of latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a prospective, observational, noninterventional study.
Guzy, C; Heckmann, B; Miller, PJ; Schwenn, O, 2010
)
0.36
"5%), in order to evaluate both efficacy (intraocular pressure lowering) and tolerability (patient and investigator satisfaction) of two dosing regimens--evening (PM) and morning (AM)."( Comparison of evening and morning dosing of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination in 6 month period.
Bojić, L; Dosen, VM; Ekert, M; Laus, KN; Mandić, Z; Suić, SP, 2010
)
0.36
"To assess the relation between visual field progression and adherence rate in patients with glaucoma using Travatan Dosing Aid® (TDA)."( Do adherence rates and glaucomatous visual field progression correlate?
Bianchi, PE; Pasinetti, GM; Radaelli, R; Rossi, GC; Scudeller, L,
)
0.13
"Both topical β blockers with a once-daily dosing regimen temporarily deteriorate optical quality of the eye by increasing higher-order aberrations, and the increases are much larger after instillation of timolol gel than long-acting carteolol."( Time course of changes in ocular aberrations after instillation of carteolol long-acting solution and timolol gel-forming solution.
Daito, M; Hiraoka, T; Kiuchi, T; Okamoto, F; Oshika, T, 2011
)
0.37
" The potential benefit to the human ocular surface with oncedaily dosing needs to be evaluated clinically."( Polyquad-preserved travoprost/timolol, benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved travoprost/timolol, and latanoprost/timolol in fixed combinations: a rabbit ocular surface study.
Baudouin, C; Brignole-Baudouin, F; Liang, H; Pauly, A; Riancho, L, 2011
)
0.37
"In this prospective randomized controlled trial, subjects with IOP of at least 22  mm Hg in one or both eyes at 0900  h, and IOP of at least 21  mm Hg in one or both eyes at 1100  h and 1600  h at two eligibility visits were randomly assigned to receive either TRA/TIM BAK-free (n=195) or TRA/TIM (n=193), dosed once daily in the morning (0900  h) for 6 weeks."( Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5%-fixed combination with and without benzalkonium chloride: a prospective, randomized, doubled-masked comparison of safety and efficacy.
Bae, K; Iwamoto, Y; Kitazawa, Y; Kotake, S; Sasaki, N; Smith, P, 2011
)
0.37
" Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) of the right eye (by a blinded observer) was performed on day 1 of each study period pre-dose and 2 h post dosing by means of Goldmann applanation tonometry."( Pharmacodynamic equivalence study of two preparations of eye drops containing dorzolamide and timolol in healthy volunteers.
Demircheva, I; Gatchev, E; Hristova, R; Kolev, E; Koytchev, R; Petrov, A; Richter, W; Tegel, F; Thyroff-Friesinger, U, 2011
)
0.37
" A change was done from prior monotherapy at day 0 to TTFC dosed once a day, regardless in the evening or in the morning, without washout period."( Safety and efficacy of monotherapy change to fixed combination (travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5%) in 6 months follow up period.
Barisić, F; Biuk, D; Bojić, L; Clementi, D; Dobutović, D; Dogan, KK; Dosen, VM; Ekert, M; Geser, MZ; Iveković, R; Jurić-Miletić, A; Kovacević, S; Kovacić, Z; Krolo, I; Mandić, Z; Novak-Laus, K; Pavan, J; Pelcić, G; Popović-Suić, S; Susić, N; Tomić, M, 2010
)
0.36
"This 8-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, noninferiority study compared once-daily evening dosing of LTFC with the unfixed combination of latanoprost, one drop in the evening, and timolol, one drop in the morning (LTuFC)."( Comparative efficacy and safety of the fixed versus unfixed combination of latanoprost and timolol in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Ge, J; Li, XX; Li, YM; Sheng, YH; Sun, NX; Sun, XH; Yao, K; Zhao, JL; Zhong, Z, 2011
)
0.37
" All subjects were given a Travalert(®) dosing aid and were reviewed after one and four months."( [The influence of the Travalert(®) dosing aid on medical treatment compliance and the quality of life of glaucoma patients].
Escalada, A; García Sánchez, J; García-Feijoó, J; Martínez-de-la-Casa, JM; Sáenz-Francés, F; Sánchez-Pulgarín, M, 2011
)
0.37
"Compliance is very important in the treatment of glaucoma, and our study provides objective data through the use of Travalert dosing aid with relative compliances of 70%."( [The influence of the Travalert(®) dosing aid on medical treatment compliance and the quality of life of glaucoma patients].
Escalada, A; García Sánchez, J; García-Feijoó, J; Martínez-de-la-Casa, JM; Sáenz-Francés, F; Sánchez-Pulgarín, M, 2011
)
0.37
" This study utilises the methods of cassette dosing and the perfused ovine eye model - to reduce animal usage and therefore animal time - to show that for a series of beta adrenoreceptor antagonists, lipophilicity is a key physicochemical property that governs drug distribution within the eye."( A pharmacokinetic study of a combination of beta adrenoreceptor antagonists - in the isolated perfused ovine eye.
Mains, J; Tan, LE; Urquhart, A; Wilson, C, 2012
)
0.38
" Each participant underwent aqueous humor dynamics measurements at baseline and at 2 weeks of dosing in random order with latanoprost in the evening and placebo in the morning, timolol maleate twice daily, and dorzolamide hydrochloride twice daily."( Diurnal and nocturnal variations in aqueous humor dynamics of patients with ocular hypertension undergoing medical therapy.
Fan, S; Gangahar, C; Gulati, V; Maslonka, MA; Toris, CB; Zhao, M, 2012
)
0.38
"83 mmHg) was comparable with that by eye drops with similar drug dosing (4."( Drug delivery by contact lens in spontaneously glaucomatous dogs.
Ben-Shlomo, A; Chauhan, A; Mackay, EO; Peng, CC; Plummer, CE, 2012
)
0.38
"005% (n = 75, dosed in the evening, with vehicle control in the morning to maintain masking) for 12 weeks."( Fixed-combination brimonidine-timolol versus latanoprost in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a 12-week, randomized, comparison study.
Cottingham, AJ; Hollander, DA; Katz, LJ; Rauchman, SH; Schiffman, RM; Simmons, ST; Williams, JM, 2012
)
0.38
"To study the effect of patient education and the TravAlert(®) -Eyot(®) drop guider on intraocular pressure (IOP) and adherence in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) monitored with the TravAlert(®) dosing aid."( Adherence improvement in Dutch glaucoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Beckers, HJ; Brink, HM; Busch, MJ; Colen, TP; Schouten, JS; Webers, CA, 2013
)
0.39
" Patients were randomized to one of the four study arms: (1) use of the dosing aid, (2) use of the dosing aid with the drop guider, (3) use of the dosing aid together with patient education or (4) use of the dosing aid and drop guider together with patient education."( Adherence improvement in Dutch glaucoma patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Beckers, HJ; Brink, HM; Busch, MJ; Colen, TP; Schouten, JS; Webers, CA, 2013
)
0.39
" However, the effect and mechanism of dosage form pH upon skin permeation of these weak bases is not well understood."( Evaluation of skin permeation of β-blockers for topical drug delivery.
Chantasart, D; Hao, J; Li, SK, 2013
)
0.39
" Based on the optimized formulation, triple-layered ocular inserts (reservoir type) of dual drug were prepared by solvent casting technique with an objective of reducing the frequency of administration, obtaining controlled release and greater therapeutic efficacy, preservative free dosage form for the treatment of glaucoma."( Chick chorioallantoic membrane model for in ovo evaluation of timolol maleate-brimonidine tartrate ocular inserts.
Appapurapu, AK; Ravindran, VK; Repala, S; Subadhra, S, 2014
)
0.4
"Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination administered in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension was not inferior to concurrent dosing with the individual components."( Safety and efficacy of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Chen, X; Dong, Y; Fang, A; Hu, Y; Ling, Z; Liu, D; Sun, W; Sun, X; Wang, Y; Xing, Y; Ye, J; Yin, Z; Zhang, M, 2014
)
0.4
" The method is successfully applied for the determination of TM in bulk powder and pharmaceutical dosage form."( Development and validation of a stability-indicating micellar liquid chromatographic method for the determination of timolol maleate in the presence of its degradation products.
Merey, HA; Rizk, MS; Sweilam, MN; Tawakkol, SM, 2015
)
0.42
" The aqueous humor concentration of the second administered drug (tafluprost) was not affected by the dosing conditions, whereas the concentration of the first instilled drug (timolol) without the interval was lower than that with a 5-min interval (1,200 ng · h/mL vs."( Benefits of Tafluprost and Timolol Fixed-Dose Combination for the Treatment of Glaucoma Are Confirmed by Studies on Experimental Animal Models.
Akaishi, T; Kawazu, K; Miyawaki, N; Shimazaki, A; Tonouchi, A; Ueda, K, 2015
)
0.42
" A wash-out interval of at least 4 weeks separated each three 8-day dosing period."( Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I Comparison vs. the Corresponding Preservative-free Monotherapies.
Ikäheimo, K; Kaarniranta, K; Mannermaa, E; Ropo, A, 2016
)
0.43
"Plasma concentrations of tafluprost acid were low, with similar levels measured subsequent to either single or repeated dosing of PF FDC and PF tafluprost."( Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I Comparison vs. the Corresponding Preservative-free Monotherapies.
Ikäheimo, K; Kaarniranta, K; Mannermaa, E; Ropo, A, 2016
)
0.43
" Globally, eye drops are among the most common and popular conventional formulations, but they are also associated with some limitations in terms of therapeutic response, bioavailability, dosing frequency and poor patient compliance."( Medical management of glaucoma: focus on ophthalmologic drug delivery systems of timolol maleate.
Sah, AK; Suresh, PK, 2017
)
0.46
"5% (TRAV+TIM; unfixed) using electronic dosing aids."( Adherence to Fixed-Combination Versus Unfixed Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.
Barnebey, HS; Robin, AL, 2017
)
0.46
"TTFC was administered once daily in the morning or evening with a single dosing aid."( Adherence to Fixed-Combination Versus Unfixed Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.
Barnebey, HS; Robin, AL, 2017
)
0.46
"Adherence with administered medication, as recorded by the dosing aids."( Adherence to Fixed-Combination Versus Unfixed Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.
Barnebey, HS; Robin, AL, 2017
)
0.46
" However, the appropriate indications, drug dosage, dosing regimen, time for initiation, optimal duration, monitoring for side effects still remains controversial."( [Chinese expert consensus on the use of topical timolol maleate treatment of infantile hemangiomas].
Fan, XD; Huo, R; Jiang, CH; Lei, SR; Liu, SH; Qin, ZP; Wang, XK; Wang, XY; Yang, YW; Zhao, JH; Zheng, JW; Zhou, DK, 2016
)
0.43
" This includes liquid phase formulation localisation on the ocular surface once administered as formulated eye-drops; with the vast majority of dosage (>90%) escaping from the administered site due to tear production and various drainage mechanisms."( Electrically atomised formulations of timolol maleate for direct and on-demand ocular lens coatings.
Ahmad, Z; Al-Kinani, AA; Alany, RG; Arshad, MS; Chang, MW; Haj-Ahmad, R; Mehta, P, 2017
)
0.46
" Gel dosage form allows easy and precise application and maximizes timolol's therapeutic efficacy at the sites of application."( Simple Preparation of Timolol 0.5% Gel from Eye Drop Solution for Superficial Infantile Hemangiomas.
Choo, W,
)
0.13
"This study also indicates that in vitro hepatic metabolism is over-predictive of ocular metabolism following topically ocular dosed timolol."( Investigation of Ocular Bioactivation Potential and the Role of Cytochrome P450 2D Enzymes in Rat.
Argikar, UA; Brown, A; Cirello, AL; Dumouchel, JL; Dunne, CE; Gunduz, M; Kramlinger, VM; Spear, J,
)
0.13
" Transdermal drug delivery system is the main route with discrete, self-contained dosage forms when placed on the skin, transporting the medicament through the skin into the systemic circulation in a wellcontrolled manner."( Design and Evaluation of Transdermal Patches of Timolol Maleate.
Jamakandi, VG; Panchayya Hiremath, SS; Reddy, JJ, 2018
)
0.48
" This report offers a simplified calculation of the maximum daily safe dosage as 1 drop of medication per kilogram of body weight."( Doing the math: A simple approach to topical timolol dosing for infantile hemangiomas.
Dalla Costa, R; Prindaville, B; Wiss, K, 2018
)
0.48
" Fixed dose combinations (FDCs) are a pharmacological form of eye drops that combines two or more active drugs in a single dosage form."( [The role of fixed dose combinations in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma].
Petrov, SY; Volzhanin, AV; Zinina, VS,
)
0.13
" This is likely to offer an alternative dosage form for management of glaucoma with particular emphasis on improving poor patient compliance."( Engineering and Development of Chitosan-Based Nanocoatings for Ocular Contact Lenses.
Ahmad, Z; Al-Kinani, AA; Alany, RG; Arshad, MS; Chang, MW; Mehta, P; Singh, N; van der Merwe, SM, 2019
)
0.51
"Timolol is a non-cardioselective beta blocker and has different combined ophthalmic dosage forms for treatment of glaucoma."( A versatile HPLC method with an isocratic single mobile phase system for simultaneous determination of anti-glaucoma formulations containing timolol.
El Abass, SA; Elmansi, HM; Ibrahim, FA, 2019
)
0.51
" The utilization of simulated biological fluids can give a superior understanding of the release mechanisms and practicable in vivo nature of a dosage form that can improve the predictive potential of in vitro drug release testing."( Simultaneous determination of dorzolamide and timolol by first-order derivative UV spectroscopy in simulated biological fluid for in vitro drug release testing.
Amin, P; Jain, D; Tambe, S, 2021
)
0.62
" Propranolol can commence for most infants in the outpatient setting and the most frequently employed dosing regimen is 1 mg/kg twice daily."( Infantile hemangioma. Part 2: Management.
Rodríguez Bandera, AL; Sebaratnam, DF; Wargon, O; Wong, LF, 2021
)
0.62
" Both the PD(+) group and the PD(-) group were evaluated using clinical data such as age, sex, dosing duration, presence of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) in the formulation, ocular surgery history (e."( Risk factors for periorbital dermatitis in patients using dorzolamide/timolol eye drops.
Jang, H; Kim, M; Rho, S, 2021
)
0.62
" However, they were not necessarily considered unreasonable because the dosage forms were administered at different times."( The use of fixed dose drug combinations for glaucoma in clinical settings: a retrospective, observational, single-centre study.
Huang, T; Shen, J; Xiong, X; Yan, J, 2022
)
0.72
"Most common intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction regimens for the management of glaucoma include the topical use of eye drops, a dosage form that is associated with short residence time at the site of action, increased dosing frequency, and reduced patient compliance."( In Situ Gelling Electrospun Ocular Films Sustain the Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Effect of Timolol Maleate: In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and Pharmacodynamic Assessment.
Andreadis, D; Andreadis, II; Bouropoulos, N; Fatouros, DG; Karavasili, C; Komnenou, A; Thomas, A; Tzetzis, D; Tzimtzimis, M, 2022
)
0.72
" All subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to LBN dosed once daily or timolol dosed twice daily in both eyes (OU) for a duration of 4 weeks each, separated by a 2-week washout period."( Comparison of the Effects of Latanoprostene Bunod and Timolol on Retinal Blood Vessel Density: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Brye, N; Camp, A; Do, JL; El-Nimri, NW; Ghahari, E; Moghimi, S; Penteado, RC; Proudfoot, J; Rubio, V; Salcedo, M; Weinreb, RN; Yang, D, 2022
)
0.72
" Country-level subanalysis examined outcomes by prior monotherapy, diagnosis and timing of dosing for those countries recruiting ≥20 patients (Country-level Subanalysis Population)."( A comparison of country-level data from the VISIONARY study examining treatment outcomes with preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed-dose combination therapy.
Fassari, C; Holló, G; Kirwan, J; Lopez-Lopez, F; Oddone, F; Zimina, M, 2022
)
0.72
" Within country, outcomes were consistent regardless of diagnosis, dosing or prior monotherapy."( A comparison of country-level data from the VISIONARY study examining treatment outcomes with preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed-dose combination therapy.
Fassari, C; Holló, G; Kirwan, J; Lopez-Lopez, F; Oddone, F; Zimina, M, 2022
)
0.72
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
antiglaucoma drugAny drug which can be used to prevent or alleviate glaucoma, a disease in which the optic nerve is damaged, resulting in progressive, irreversible loss of vision. It is often, though not always, associated with increased pressure of the fluid in the eye.
antihypertensive agentAny drug used in the treatment of acute or chronic vascular hypertension regardless of pharmacological mechanism.
anti-arrhythmia drugA drug used for the treatment or prevention of cardiac arrhythmias. Anti-arrhythmia drugs may affect the polarisation-repolarisation phase of the action potential, its excitability or refractoriness, or impulse conduction or membrane responsiveness within cardiac fibres.
beta-adrenergic antagonistAn agent that binds to but does not activate beta-adrenergic receptors thereby blocking the actions of endogenous or exogenous beta-adrenergic agonists. beta-Adrenergic antagonists are used for treatment of hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, angina pectoris, glaucoma, migraine headaches and anxiety.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (1)

ClassDescription
timolol1,2,5-Thiadiazole substituted at the 3 position by a 3-(tert-butylamino)-2-hydroxypropoxy group and at the 4 position by a morpholin-4-yl group. The (S)-(-) enantiomer, also known as timolol, is a beta-adrenergic antagonist and is used in the mangement of glaucoma, hypertension, angina pectoris and myocardial infarction, and for the prevention of migraine.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (43)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain A, TYROSYL-DNA PHOSPHODIESTERASEHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.38720.004023.8416100.0000AID485290
thioredoxin reductaseRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency1.41250.100020.879379.4328AID588453
NFKB1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency10.00000.02827.055915.8489AID895; AID928
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.49830.000811.382244.6684AID686978
regulator of G-protein signaling 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency6.70160.531815.435837.6858AID504845
cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)Potency7.76190.00108.379861.1304AID1645840
arylsulfatase AHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.26851.069113.955137.9330AID720538
nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 1 (p105), isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency6.007019.739145.978464.9432AID1159509
cytochrome P450 2D6 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency17.38510.00207.533739.8107AID891
chromobox protein homolog 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency31.62280.006026.168889.1251AID488953
cytochrome P450 3A4 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency19.95260.031610.279239.8107AID884; AID885
muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency5.01190.00106.000935.4813AID943
lamin isoform A-delta10Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.00080.891312.067628.1838AID1487
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit piRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit deltaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
GABA theta subunitRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit epsilonRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency19.95261.000012.224831.6228AID885
ATP-dependent phosphofructokinaseTrypanosoma brucei brucei TREU927Potency42.56150.060110.745337.9330AID485368
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)134.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1443980; AID1473738
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00030.00020.93267.2000AID625205
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.00020.00000.66359.5499AID1350481; AID625205
Beta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.00260.00021.46819.0000AID625204
Beta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.00340.00011.33919.9840AID1350482; AID625204
Cytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)11.00000.00002.015110.0000AID241889
Beta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.45200.00233.24158.0600AID625206
Beta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.33900.00302.30986.0450AID625206
Beta-1 adrenergic receptorRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki0.13790.00000.667310.0000AID266006; AID266007; AID266008; AID266009; AID266010
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1ARattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)2.71200.00031.38338.4000AID625190
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1ARattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki1.08330.00010.739610.0000AID4411; AID625190
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1BRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)IC50 (µMol)2.71200.00051.48357.8000AID625190
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1BRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Ki1.55000.00031.29679.2440AID625190
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Beta-1 adrenergic receptor Cavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Kd0.00040.00000.53588.3176AID39943; AID42215
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit piRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit deltaRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1ARattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00012.29338.5114AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-5Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-4Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-6Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-3Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Beta-2 adrenergic receptorCavia porcellus (domestic guinea pig)Kd0.00020.00020.54774.4668AID40868; AID40869
GABA theta subunitRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit epsilonRattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Kd0.00020.00020.56294.4668AID40869
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (98)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
diet induced thermogenesisBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of sodium ion transportBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
transcription by RNA polymerase IIBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor-mediated endocytosisBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
smooth muscle contractionBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
activation of transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endosome to lysosome transportBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to coldBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein kinase A signalingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bone mineralizationBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
heat generationBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of multicellular organism growthBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
bone resorptionBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of smooth muscle contractionBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
brown fat cell differentiationBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mini excitatory postsynaptic potentialBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein serine/threonine kinase activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagosome maturationBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lipophagyBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to amyloid-betaBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to psychosocial stressBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of AMPA receptor activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine-epinephrine-mediated vasodilation involved in regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of heart rate by epinephrine-norepinephrineBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of the force of heart contraction by epinephrine-norepinephrineBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
diet induced thermogenesisBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to coldBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
heat generationBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of multicellular organism growthBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
fear responseBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian sleep/wake cycle, sleepBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
brown fat cell differentiationBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine-epinephrine-mediated vasodilation involved in regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
steroid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
cholesterol metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
estrogen metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
coumarin metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
alkaloid catabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
monoterpenoid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
isoquinoline alkaloid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic catabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
retinol metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
long-chain fatty acid biosynthetic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of bindingCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative demethylationCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cellular organofluorine metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
arachidonic acid metabolic processCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
receptor-mediated endocytosisBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
diet induced thermogenesisBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate metabolic processBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
generation of precursor metabolites and energyBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
energy reserve metabolic processBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathway, coupled to cyclic nucleotide second messengerBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-modulating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
response to coldBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
heat generationBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of multicellular organism growthBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
eating behaviorBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAPK cascadeBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
brown fat cell differentiationBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase-activating adrenergic receptor signaling pathwayBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine-epinephrine-mediated vasodilation involved in regulation of systemic arterial blood pressureBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (49)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
amyloid-beta bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta2-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
adenylate cyclase bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
potassium channel regulator activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine bindingBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta1-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
PDZ domain bindingBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-2A adrenergic receptor bindingBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled neurotransmitter receptor activity involved in regulation of postsynaptic membrane potentialBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
monooxygenase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
iron ion bindingCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen, reduced flavin or flavoprotein as one donor, and incorporation of one atom of oxygenCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
heme bindingCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 8,9 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 11,12 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
anandamide 14,15 epoxidase activityCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
norepinephrine bindingBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta3-adrenergic receptor activityBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
beta-3 adrenergic receptor bindingBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
epinephrine bindingBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (30)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomeBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
early endosomeBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
endosome membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
clathrin-coated endocytic vesicle membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal dense core vesicleBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-2 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
early endosomeBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
Schaffer collateral - CA1 synapseBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
neuronal dense core vesicleBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-1 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum membraneCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCytochrome P450 2D6Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
receptor complexBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBeta-3 adrenergic receptorHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit gamma-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit alpha-1Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneGamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (263)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1211792Hepatic clearance in human2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID444054Oral bioavailability in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID28681Partition coefficient (logD6.5)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID165803Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 2 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID1350482Displacement of [3H]-CGP12177 from human beta1 ADR expressed in HEK293T cell membranes after 90 mins by scintillation counting2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-28, Volume: 61, Issue:12
Discovery of β-Adrenergic Receptors Blocker-Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor Hybrids for Multitargeted Antiglaucoma Therapy.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID266009Antagonist activity at rat beta-1 adrenergic receptor W134A mutant expressed in CHO cells2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 49, Issue:12
Role of Tyr(356(7.43)) and Ser(190(4.57)) in antagonist binding in the rat beta1-adrenergic receptor.
AID1487626Reduction in intraocular pressure in Chinchilla rabbit assessed as maximal change in intraocular pressure at 0.1% after application of one drop (0.06 ml) of solution containing active compound/vehicle every hour (during 6 hours and after 24 hours) by auto2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 27, Issue:16
Oxindole-based intraocular pressure reducing agents.
AID496818Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID42218In vitro beta-1 adrenergic receptor activity was determined via inhibition of the positive chronotropic actions of isoproterenol in isolated guinea pig atrial preparations1983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 26, Issue:7
Beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonists: examples of the 2-[4-[3-(substituted-amino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]phenyl]imidazole class.
AID7779Oral bioavailability in human2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-17, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Graphical model for estimating oral bioavailability of drugs in humans and other species from their Caco-2 permeability and in vitro liver enzyme metabolic stability rates.
AID781326pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Avdeef ref: DOI: 10.1002/047145026X2014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID42215Compound was tested for its Beta-1 adrenergic receptor antagonistic activity on guinea pig atria1982Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 25, Issue:8
Use of (S)-(trifloxymethyl)oxirane in the synthesis of a chiral beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, (R)- and (S)-9-[[3-(tert-butylamino)-2-hydroxypropyl]oximino]fluorene.
AID165798Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 0 min administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID409952Inhibition of human brain MAOB2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID165807Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 3h administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID1211794Fraction unbound in blood (not specified)2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID227718Binding energy by using the equation deltaG obsd = -RT ln KD1984Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec, Volume: 27, Issue:12
Functional group contributions to drug-receptor interactions.
AID40869In vitro beta-2 adrenergic receptor activity was determined by measuring inhibition of the isoproterenol induced relaxation in isolated guinea pig tracheal chains contracted with PGF2-alpha1983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 26, Issue:7
Beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonists: examples of the 2-[4-[3-(substituted-amino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]phenyl]imidazole class.
AID1487633Reduction in intraocular pressure in Chinchilla rabbit assessed as maximum effective time required for reduction of intraaocular pressure at 0.1% after application of one drop (0.06 ml) of solution containing active compound/vehicle every hour (during 6 h2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 27, Issue:16
Oxindole-based intraocular pressure reducing agents.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID444052Hepatic clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID496825Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania mexicana2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID165812Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 4 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID496827Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania amazonensis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID26362Ionization constant (pKa)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID165814Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 5 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID1350490Anti-glaucoma activity in hypertonic saline-induced hypertensive New Zealand albino rabbit model assessed as decrease in intraocular pressure at 0.25% instilled into eye vitreous along with 1% DRZ measured at 4 hrs post administration by pneumatonometric 2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-28, Volume: 61, Issue:12
Discovery of β-Adrenergic Receptors Blocker-Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor Hybrids for Multitargeted Antiglaucoma Therapy.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID166292Effect on IOP of rabbits 1 hr after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID1434532Antiglaucoma activity in hypertonic saline-induced New Zealand white rabbit transient ocular hypertensive model assessed as IOP lowering efficacy at 0.5% administered topically immediately after hypertonic saline injection measured at 120 mins post dose2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-01, Volume: 27, Issue:3
New furoxan derivatives for the treatment of ocular hypertension.
AID350217Octanol-water partition coefficient, log P of the cationic form of the compound2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-28, Volume: 52, Issue:10
Lipophilicity of basic drugs measured by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID166309Effect on IOP of rabbits 8 hr after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID27167Delta logD (logD6.5 - logD7.4)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID165813Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 5 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID166306Effect on IOP of rabbits 6 hr after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID230146The cardioselectivity ratio was obtained by taking the antilog (pA2 beta1-pA2 beta2)1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 29, Issue:6
Beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonists: examples of the 2-[4-[3-(substituted amino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]phenyl]imidazole class. 2.
AID1487625Reduction in intraocular pressure in Chinchilla rabbit assessed as maximum effective time required for reduction of intraaocular pressure at 0.1% after application of one drop (0.06 ml) of solution containing active compound/vehicle every hour (during 6 h2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 27, Issue:16
Oxindole-based intraocular pressure reducing agents.
AID350220Lipophilicity, log K at pH 2 by by hydrophilic interaction chromatography using 100% water as mobile phase2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-28, Volume: 52, Issue:10
Lipophilicity of basic drugs measured by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
AID266006Antagonist activity at rat wild type beta-1 adrenergic receptor expressed in CHO cells2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 49, Issue:12
Role of Tyr(356(7.43)) and Ser(190(4.57)) in antagonist binding in the rat beta1-adrenergic receptor.
AID496817Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma cruzi2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID373867Hepatic clearance in human hepatocytes in absence of fetal calf serum2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 44, Issue:4
First-principle, structure-based prediction of hepatic metabolic clearance values in human.
AID40537Selectivity for beta-1 adrenergic receptor1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 31, Issue:11
Modeling of beta-adrenoceptors based on molecular electrostatic potential studies of agonists and antagonists.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID166300Effect on IOP of rabbits 4 hr after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID165817Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 6 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID166298Effect on IOP of rabbits 3h after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID781328pKa (acid-base dissociation constant) as determined by Luan ref: Pharm. Res. 20052014Pharmaceutical research, Apr, Volume: 31, Issue:4
Comparison of the accuracy of experimental and predicted pKa values of basic and acidic compounds.
AID29359Ionization constant (pKa)2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1487627Reduction in intraocular pressure in Chinchilla rabbit assessed as maximum effective time required for reduction of intraaocular pressure at 0.1% after application of one drop (0.06 ml) of solution containing active compound/vehicle every hour (during 6 h2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 27, Issue:16
Oxindole-based intraocular pressure reducing agents.
AID104489Effect on intraocular pressure in right eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at 10 min.1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID241889Inhibitory activity against recombinant human Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) after incubated for 45 minutes2005Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-01, Volume: 15, Issue:17
A 3D-QSAR model for CYP2D6 inhibition in the aryloxypropanolamine series.
AID425653Renal clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID496832Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID444053Renal clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID21278Permeability through isolated albino rabbit denuded (epithelium-free) cornea1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 31, Issue:2
(Acyloxy)alkyl carbamates as novel bioreversible prodrugs for amines: increased permeation through biological membranes.
AID1350487Anti-glaucoma activity in hypertonic saline-induced hypertensive New Zealand albino rabbit model assessed as decrease in intraocular pressure at 0.25% instilled into eye vitreous measured at 2 hrs post administration by pneumatonometric analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-28, Volume: 61, Issue:12
Discovery of β-Adrenergic Receptors Blocker-Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor Hybrids for Multitargeted Antiglaucoma Therapy.
AID166289Effect on IOP of rabbits 0 min after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID266010Antagonist activity at rat beta-1 adrenergic receptor S190A mutant expressed in CHO cells2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 49, Issue:12
Role of Tyr(356(7.43)) and Ser(190(4.57)) in antagonist binding in the rat beta1-adrenergic receptor.
AID165809Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 3h administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID350219Lipophilicity, log K at pH 2 by by hydrophilic interaction chromatography using 95% acetonitrile as mobile phase2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-28, Volume: 52, Issue:10
Lipophilicity of basic drugs measured by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
AID165819Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 6 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID165822Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 8 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID467611Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID496830Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania major2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID165800Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 1 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID1137403In vivo beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in iv dosed anesthetized dog assessed as inhibition of isoproterenol-induced tachycardia1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Symbiotic approach to drug design: antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID166302Effect on IOP of rabbits 5 hr after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID186705Comparative effect on Maximum fall in mean arterial pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rat at the dose 0.312 mg/kg per os1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Heterocyclic analogues of the antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agent (S)-2-[3-(ter-butylamino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]-3-cyanopyridine.
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID104346Effect on intraocular pressure in left eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at 20 min.1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID567091Drug absorption in human assessed as human intestinal absorption rate2011European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 46, Issue:1
Prediction of drug intestinal absorption by new linear and non-linear QSPR.
AID592681Apparent permeability across human Caco2 cell membrane after 2 hrs by LC-MS/MS analysis2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8
QSAR-based permeability model for drug-like compounds.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID28926Effective permeability corrected for ionization2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 44, Issue:6
High-throughput permeability pH profile and high-throughput alkane/water log P with artificial membranes.
AID29813Oral bioavailability in human2000Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-29, Volume: 43, Issue:13
QSAR model for drug human oral bioavailability.
AID91481Binding constant against human serum albumin (HSA)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-06, Volume: 44, Issue:25
Cheminformatic models to predict binding affinities to human serum albumin.
AID350218Octanol-water partition coefficient, log PC of the compound2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-28, Volume: 52, Issue:10
Lipophilicity of basic drugs measured by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
AID1137402In vivo beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in iv dosed anesthetized dog assessed as inhibition of isoproterenol-induced hypotension1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Symbiotic approach to drug design: antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID165806Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 30 min administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID476929Human intestinal absorption in po dosed human2010European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 45, Issue:3
Neural computational prediction of oral drug absorption based on CODES 2D descriptors.
AID39943In vitro inhibitory activity against beta-1 adrenergic receptor measured by inhibition of positive chronotropic effect of isoproterenolin in isolated guinea pig atria1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 29, Issue:6
Beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonists: examples of the 2-[4-[3-(substituted amino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]phenyl]imidazole class. 2.
AID1350488Anti-glaucoma activity in hypertonic saline-induced hypertensive New Zealand albino rabbit model assessed as decrease in intraocular pressure at 0.25% instilled into eye vitreous along with 1% DRZ measured at 2 hrs post administration by pneumatonometric 2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-28, Volume: 61, Issue:12
Discovery of β-Adrenergic Receptors Blocker-Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor Hybrids for Multitargeted Antiglaucoma Therapy.
AID165801Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 2 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID186706Comparative effect on Maximum fall in mean arterial pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rat at the dose 0.625 mg/kg per os1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Heterocyclic analogues of the antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agent (S)-2-[3-(ter-butylamino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]-3-cyanopyridine.
AID104488Effect on intraocular pressure in right eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at 0 min.1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID386623Inhibition of 4-(4-(dimethylamino)styryl)-N-methylpyridinium uptake at human OCT1 expressed in HEK293 cells at 100 uM by confocal microscopy2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-09, Volume: 51, Issue:19
Structural requirements for drug inhibition of the liver specific human organic cation transport protein 1.
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID404304Effect on human MRP2-mediated estradiol-17-beta-glucuronide transport in Sf9 cells inverted membrane vesicles relative to control2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-12, Volume: 51, Issue:11
Prediction and identification of drug interactions with the human ATP-binding cassette transporter multidrug-resistance associated protein 2 (MRP2; ABCC2).
AID1668042Antiproliferative activity against human A375 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition at 100 uM measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-01, Volume: 28, Issue:9
Drug repurposing and rediscovery: Design, synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of 1-arylamino-3-aryloxypropan-2-ols as anti-melanoma agents.
AID4411Binding affinity of a compound to rat brain 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (serotonin) receptor assayed by radiolabeled [3H]-8-OH-DPAT ligand displacement1996Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 39, Issue:1
Binding of arylpiperazines, (aryloxy)propanolamines, and tetrahydropyridylindoles to the 5-HT1A receptor: contribution of the molecular lipophilicity potential to three-dimensional quantitative structure-affinity relationship models.
AID165799Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 1 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID166296Effect on IOP of rabbits 30 mins after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID166293Effect on IOP of rabbits 2 hr after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID1137376Antihypertensive activity in spontaneously hypertensive Wistar-Okamoto rat assessed as maximal fall in mean arterial pressure at 0.625 mg/kg, po1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Symbiotic approach to drug design: antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID497005Antimicrobial activity against Pneumocystis carinii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID104492Effect on intraocular pressure in right eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at 20 min.1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID1350486Anti-glaucoma activity in hypertonic saline-induced hypertensive New Zealand albino rabbit model assessed as decrease in intraocular pressure at 0.25% instilled into eye vitreous measured at 60 mins post administration by pneumatonometric analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-28, Volume: 61, Issue:12
Discovery of β-Adrenergic Receptors Blocker-Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor Hybrids for Multitargeted Antiglaucoma Therapy.
AID59473Beta adrenergic blockade activity was measured in anesthetized dogs by blockade of isoproterenol induced tachycardia after iv administration1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Heterocyclic analogues of the antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agent (S)-2-[3-(ter-butylamino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]-3-cyanopyridine.
AID1137372Antihypertensive activity in spontaneously hypertensive Wistar-Okamoto rat assessed as maximal fall in mean arterial pressure at 1.25 mg/kg, po1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Symbiotic approach to drug design: antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1137375Antihypertensive activity in spontaneously hypertensive Wistar-Okamoto rat assessed as maximal fall in mean arterial pressure at 0.312 mg/kg, po1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Symbiotic approach to drug design: antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID186707Comparative effect on Maximum fall in mean arterial pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rat at the dose 1.25 mg/kg per os1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Heterocyclic analogues of the antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agent (S)-2-[3-(ter-butylamino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]-3-cyanopyridine.
AID467613Volume of distribution at steady state in human2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID205268Inhibition of binding of Batrachotoxinin [3H]BTX-B to high affinity sites on voltage dependent sodium channels in a vesicular preparation from guinea pig cerebral cortex at 10 uM1985Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 28, Issue:3
[3H]Batrachotoxinin A 20 alpha-benzoate binding to voltage-sensitive sodium channels: a rapid and quantitative assay for local anesthetic activity in a variety of drugs.
AID1668041Antiproliferative activity against human SK-MEL-28 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition at 100 uM measured after 48 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-01, Volume: 28, Issue:9
Drug repurposing and rediscovery: Design, synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of 1-arylamino-3-aryloxypropan-2-ols as anti-melanoma agents.
AID28928Intrinsic permeability of the compound2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 44, Issue:6
High-throughput permeability pH profile and high-throughput alkane/water log P with artificial membranes.
AID165820Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 8 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID496829Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania infantum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID19006Calculated membrane partition coefficient (Kmemb)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-25, Volume: 47, Issue:7
Surface activity profiling of drugs applied to the prediction of blood-brain barrier permeability.
AID104343Effect on intraocular pressure in left eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at 10 min.1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID28925Highest effective permeability across hexadecane membrane (pH 4-8)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 44, Issue:6
High-throughput permeability pH profile and high-throughput alkane/water log P with artificial membranes.
AID679124TP_TRANSPORTER: uptake in K562 and K562/ADR cell1996The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology, Oct, Volume: 48, Issue:10
Active secretion of drugs from the small intestinal epithelium in rats by P-glycoprotein functioning as an absorption barrier.
AID424015Vasodilation activity in rabbit aortic rings assessed as relaxation of 3 uM methoxamine-induced contraction in absence of guanylate cyclase inhibitor 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:10
Synthesis of novel nitric oxide (NO)-releasing esters of timolol.
AID1350481Displacement of [3H]-CGP12177 from human beta2 ADR expressed in HEK293T cell membrane after 90 mins by scintillation counting2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-28, Volume: 61, Issue:12
Discovery of β-Adrenergic Receptors Blocker-Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor Hybrids for Multitargeted Antiglaucoma Therapy.
AID104495Effect on intraocular pressure in right eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at 40 min.1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID59472Beta adrenergic blockade activity was measured in anesthetized dogs by blockade of isoproterenol induced hypotension after iv administration1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Heterocyclic analogues of the antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agent (S)-2-[3-(ter-butylamino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]-3-cyanopyridine.
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID7812In vitro rate of absorption observed as Caco-2 permeability in humans2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-17, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Graphical model for estimating oral bioavailability of drugs in humans and other species from their Caco-2 permeability and in vitro liver enzyme metabolic stability rates.
AID104340Effect on intraocular pressure in left eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at 0 min.1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID28679Partition coefficient (logD6.8)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 44, Issue:6
High-throughput permeability pH profile and high-throughput alkane/water log P with artificial membranes.
AID1350474Anti-glaucoma activity in hypertonic saline-induced hypertensive New Zealand albino rabbit model assessed as decrease in intraocular pressure at 0.25% instilled into eye vitreous measured at 4 hrs post administration by pneumatonometric analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-28, Volume: 61, Issue:12
Discovery of β-Adrenergic Receptors Blocker-Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor Hybrids for Multitargeted Antiglaucoma Therapy.
AID165810Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 4 hr administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID21271Mean apparent permeability through fuzzy rat skin1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 31, Issue:2
(Acyloxy)alkyl carbamates as novel bioreversible prodrugs for amines: increased permeation through biological membranes.
AID467612Fraction unbound in human plasma2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 44, Issue:11
Prediction of volume of distribution values in human using immobilized artificial membrane partitioning coefficients, the fraction of compound ionized and plasma protein binding data.
AID603953In-vivo plasma to lung partition coefficients of the compound, logP(lung) in rat2008European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 43, Issue:3
Air to lung partition coefficients for volatile organic compounds and blood to lung partition coefficients for volatile organic compounds and drugs.
AID8002Observed volume of distribution2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID40868Beta-2 adrenergic receptor antagonistic activity on guinea pig tracheal chains1982Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug, Volume: 25, Issue:8
Use of (S)-(trifloxymethyl)oxirane in the synthesis of a chiral beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, (R)- and (S)-9-[[3-(tert-butylamino)-2-hydroxypropyl]oximino]fluorene.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID444051Total clearance in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1668034Antiproliferative activity against human SK-MEL-28 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-01, Volume: 28, Issue:9
Drug repurposing and rediscovery: Design, synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of 1-arylamino-3-aryloxypropan-2-ols as anti-melanoma agents.
AID237685Lipophilicity determined as logarithm of the partition coefficient in the alkane/water system2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-05, Volume: 48, Issue:9
Calculating virtual log P in the alkane/water system (log P(N)(alk)) and its derived parameters deltalog P(N)(oct-alk) and log D(pH)(alk).
AID496823Antimicrobial activity against Trichomonas vaginalis2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID28234% absorbed in human GI-tract2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 44, Issue:6
High-throughput permeability pH profile and high-throughput alkane/water log P with artificial membranes.
AID266007Antagonist activity at rat beta-1 adrenergic receptor Y356F mutant expressed in CHO cells2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 49, Issue:12
Role of Tyr(356(7.43)) and Ser(190(4.57)) in antagonist binding in the rat beta1-adrenergic receptor.
AID186074Compound was tested for effect on arterial pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) at 1.25 mg/kg, po1981Journal of medicinal chemistry, May, Volume: 24, Issue:5
Approaches to vasodilating/beta-adrenergic blocking agents: examples of the dihydrolutidine type.
AID21277Permeability through isolated albino rabbit cornea1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 31, Issue:2
(Acyloxy)alkyl carbamates as novel bioreversible prodrugs for amines: increased permeation through biological membranes.
AID1211798Intrinsic clearance in human using well stirred liver model by LC-MS/MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID1434531Antiglaucoma activity in hypertonic saline-induced New Zealand white rabbit transient ocular hypertensive model assessed as IOP lowering efficacy at 0.5% administered topically immediately after hypertonic saline injection measured at 60 mins post dose2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 02-01, Volume: 27, Issue:3
New furoxan derivatives for the treatment of ocular hypertension.
AID41890Tested for intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA); Pure antagonist1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 31, Issue:11
Modeling of beta-adrenoceptors based on molecular electrostatic potential studies of agonists and antagonists.
AID424016Vasodilation activity in rabbit aortic rings assessed as relaxation of 3 uM methoxamine-induced contraction in presence of 10 uM guanylate cyclase inhibitor 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-15, Volume: 19, Issue:10
Synthesis of novel nitric oxide (NO)-releasing esters of timolol.
AID1668032Antiproliferative activity against human SK-MEL-5 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition at 100 uM incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay relative to control2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-01, Volume: 28, Issue:9
Drug repurposing and rediscovery: Design, synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of 1-arylamino-3-aryloxypropan-2-ols as anti-melanoma agents.
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID496821Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID496831Antimicrobial activity against Cryptosporidium parvum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID167755Compound was evaluated for ocular hypotensive effects (intraocular pressure, IOP) by administering 0.5% of the drug twice daily1997Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-29, Volume: 40, Issue:18
New approaches to antiglaucoma therapy.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID441223Inhibition of dexamethasone-induced ocular hypertension in C57BL/6J Tyr c-Brd x 129S5/SvEvBrD hybrid mouse assessed as reduction of intraocular pressure at 3 ug after 2 hrs administered as cosolvent/HPMC based formulation2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-12, Volume: 52, Issue:21
Novel class of LIM-kinase 2 inhibitors for the treatment of ocular hypertension and associated glaucoma.
AID165804Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 30 min administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID1668033Antiproliferative activity against human SK-MEL-5 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-01, Volume: 28, Issue:9
Drug repurposing and rediscovery: Design, synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of 1-arylamino-3-aryloxypropan-2-ols as anti-melanoma agents.
AID1211795Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID444055Fraction absorbed in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID496824Antimicrobial activity against Toxoplasma gondii2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID59479Beta-adrenergic blocking activity in anesthetized dog, by the inhibition of isoproterenol -induced tachycardia after iv administration1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 23, Issue:11
Urinary metabolites of timolol from humans and laboratory animals. Syntheses and beta-adrenergic blocking activities.
AID1487624Reduction in intraocular pressure in Chinchilla rabbit assessed as maximal change in intraocular pressure at 0.1% after application of one drop (0.06 ml) of solution containing active compound/vehicle every hour (during 6 hours and after 24 hours) by appl2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 08-15, Volume: 27, Issue:16
Oxindole-based intraocular pressure reducing agents.
AID40872In vitro inhibitory activity against beta-2 adrenoceptor was measured by the inhibition of isoproterenol-induced relaxation of PGF2-alpha contracted guinea pig trachea1986Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 29, Issue:6
Beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonists: examples of the 2-[4-[3-(substituted amino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]phenyl]imidazole class. 2.
AID444057Fraction escaping hepatic elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID425652Total body clearance in human2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-13, Volume: 52, Issue:15
Physicochemical determinants of human renal clearance.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID104353Effect on intraocular pressure in left eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at basal condition1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID1211797Intrinsic clearance in cryopreserved human hepatocytes cells assessed per 10'6 cells by LC-MS/MS method2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID7974Metabolic stability observed at 30 min after administration in human liver microsomes2002Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-17, Volume: 45, Issue:2
Graphical model for estimating oral bioavailability of drugs in humans and other species from their Caco-2 permeability and in vitro liver enzyme metabolic stability rates.
AID1668035Antiproliferative activity against human A375 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 05-01, Volume: 28, Issue:9
Drug repurposing and rediscovery: Design, synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of 1-arylamino-3-aryloxypropan-2-ols as anti-melanoma agents.
AID496819Antimicrobial activity against Plasmodium falciparum2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID1211791Fraction unbound in human hepatocytes2012Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jan, Volume: 40, Issue:1
Comparison of cryopreserved HepaRG cells with cryopreserved human hepatocytes for prediction of clearance for 26 drugs.
AID28921Partition coefficient (logP) (hexadecane)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 44, Issue:6
High-throughput permeability pH profile and high-throughput alkane/water log P with artificial membranes.
AID104349Effect on intraocular pressure in left eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at 40 min.1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID21234Partition coefficient of compound in to octanol/buffer1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 34, Issue:3
Reevaluating equilibrium and kinetic binding parameters for lipophilic drugs based on a structural model for drug interaction with biological membranes.
AID59477Beta-adrenergic blocking activity in anesthetized dog, by the inhibition of isoproterenol -induced hypotension after iv administration1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 23, Issue:11
Urinary metabolites of timolol from humans and laboratory animals. Syntheses and beta-adrenergic blocking activities.
AID1443980Inhibition of human BSEP expressed in fall armyworm sf9 cell plasma membrane vesicles assessed as reduction in vesicle-associated [3H]-taurocholate transport preincubated for 10 mins prior to ATP addition measured after 15 mins in presence of [3H]-tauroch2010Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Dec, Volume: 118, Issue:2
Interference with bile salt export pump function is a susceptibility factor for human liver injury in drug development.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID28924Effective permeability (Pe) across a hexadecane membrane (pH 6.8)2001Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 44, Issue:6
High-throughput permeability pH profile and high-throughput alkane/water log P with artificial membranes.
AID496826Antimicrobial activity against Entamoeba histolytica2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID409950Inhibition of human brain MAOA2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-13, Volume: 51, Issue:21
Quantitative structure-activity relationship and complex network approach to monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
AID444058Volume of distribution at steady state in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID496828Antimicrobial activity against Leishmania donovani2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID350216Dissociation constant, pKa of the compound2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-28, Volume: 52, Issue:10
Lipophilicity of basic drugs measured by hydrophilic interaction chromatography.
AID444056Fraction escaping gut-wall elimination in human2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID455986Permeability across human Caco-2 cells2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Computational modeling of novel inhibitors targeting the Akt pleckstrin homology domain.
AID41487Selectivity towards beta-2 adrenergic receptor; Nonselective towards beta-2 adrenergic receptor1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 31, Issue:11
Modeling of beta-adrenoceptors based on molecular electrostatic potential studies of agonists and antagonists.
AID104498Effect on intraocular pressure in right eye was tested by using transition ocular hypertension model at basal condition1992Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-10, Volume: 35, Issue:14
Acetazolamide-like carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with topical ocular hypotensive activity.
AID218848Change in Gibb's free energy at Low affinity beta-2-adrenoceptor in the Chang living cells1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 31, Issue:6
Mapping of the beta 2-adrenoceptor on Chang liver cells. Differences between high- and low-affinity receptor states.
AID165796Percentage change of IOP in rabbits after 0 min administration (1%) of compound1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID7783Unbound fraction (plasma)2004Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 47, Issue:5
Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.
AID496820Antimicrobial activity against Trypanosoma brucei2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Mar-15, Volume: 18, Issue:6
Multi-target spectral moment QSAR versus ANN for antiparasitic drugs against different parasite species.
AID266008Antagonist activity at rat beta-1 adrenergic receptor Y356A mutant expressed in CHO cells2006Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-15, Volume: 49, Issue:12
Role of Tyr(356(7.43)) and Ser(190(4.57)) in antagonist binding in the rat beta1-adrenergic receptor.
AID21233Partition coefficient of compound in to biological membranes1991Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar, Volume: 34, Issue:3
Reevaluating equilibrium and kinetic binding parameters for lipophilic drugs based on a structural model for drug interaction with biological membranes.
AID59474Beta-adrenergic blocking activity in anesthetized dog, by the inhibition of isoproterenol -induced bronchodilatation after iv administration1980Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 23, Issue:11
Urinary metabolites of timolol from humans and laboratory animals. Syntheses and beta-adrenergic blocking activities.
AID444050Fraction unbound in human plasma2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-11, Volume: 53, Issue:3
Physicochemical space for optimum oral bioavailability: contribution of human intestinal absorption and first-pass elimination.
AID1137386Antihypertensive activity in spontaneously hypertensive Wistar-Okamoto rat assessed as duration of action at 0.312 mg/kg, po1979Journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Symbiotic approach to drug design: antihypertensive beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID230147The cardioselectivity ratio was obtained by taking the antilog of (pA2(beta-1)-pA2(beta2))1983Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul, Volume: 26, Issue:7
Beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonists: examples of the 2-[4-[3-(substituted-amino)-2-hydroxypropoxy]phenyl]imidazole class.
AID166291Effect on IOP of rabbits 0 min after administration (1%)1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan, Volume: 31, Issue:1
Improved delivery through biological membranes. 26. Design, synthesis, and pharmacological activity of a novel chemical delivery system for beta-adrenergic blocking agents.
AID16351Percent diffusion through fuzzy rat skin after 48 h of incubation1988Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb, Volume: 31, Issue:2
(Acyloxy)alkyl carbamates as novel bioreversible prodrugs for amines: increased permeation through biological membranes.
AID1347058CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - HTRF assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID588378qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation
AID1347059CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - Alpha assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347410qHTS for inhibitors of adenylyl cyclases using a fission yeast platform: a pilot screen against the NCATS LOPAC library2019Cellular signalling, 08, Volume: 60A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening.
AID588349qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression: Validation of Cytotoxic Assay
AID1347057CD47-SIRPalpha protein protein interaction - LANCE assay qHTS validation2019PloS one, , Volume: 14, Issue:7
Quantitative high-throughput screening assays for the discovery and development of SIRPα-CD47 interaction inhibitors.
AID1347405qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS LOPAC collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID504812Inverse Agonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID504836Inducers of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response (ERSR) in human glioma: Validation2002The Journal of biological chemistry, Apr-19, Volume: 277, Issue:16
Sustained ER Ca2+ depletion suppresses protein synthesis and induces activation-enhanced cell death in mast cells.
AID1347050Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr2) antagonism - Pilot subtype selectivity assay2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347049Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot screen2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID1347045Natriuretic polypeptide receptor (hNpr1) antagonism - Pilot counterscreen GloSensor control cell line2019Science translational medicine, 07-10, Volume: 11, Issue:500
Inhibition of natriuretic peptide receptor 1 reduces itch in mice.
AID504810Antagonists of the Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor: HTS campaign2010Endocrinology, Jul, Volume: 151, Issue:7
A small molecule inverse agonist for the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor.
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID1346250Human beta2-adrenoceptor (Adrenoceptors)2005British journal of pharmacology, Feb, Volume: 144, Issue:3
The selectivity of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists at the human beta1, beta2 and beta3 adrenoceptors.
AID1159607Screen for inhibitors of RMI FANCM (MM2) intereaction2016Journal of biomolecular screening, Jul, Volume: 21, Issue:6
A High-Throughput Screening Strategy to Identify Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors That Block the Fanconi Anemia DNA Repair Pathway.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (3,612)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19901297 (35.91)18.7374
1990's679 (18.80)18.2507
2000's750 (20.76)29.6817
2010's672 (18.60)24.3611
2020's214 (5.92)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials1,198 (30.47%)5.53%
Reviews249 (6.33%)6.00%
Case Studies396 (10.07%)4.05%
Observational14 (0.36%)0.25%
Other2,075 (52.77%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (266)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
The Efficacy and Safety of Adding the Brinzolamide/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination (Azarga®) to Prostaglandin Monotherapy [NCT00966576]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Changes in Peripapillary Blood Flow After Use of Anti-glaucoma Medications: A Prospective, Quantitative OCT Angiography Study [NCT03323164]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-10Completed
Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group Phase 2 Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Travoprost Ophthalmic Topical Cream in Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT06152861]Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-15Recruiting
A Non-inferiority in the Intraocular Pressure Decrease of the Preservative-free Ophthalmic Solution PRO-122 Versus Concomitant Therapy in Subjects With Uncontrolled Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT03193333]Phase 351 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-06Recruiting
[NCT01111890]Phase 470 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
The Efficacy of Topical Timolol Combined With Cryotherapy in EGFR Inhibitor-induced Paronychia - a Double-blinded, Intrapatient Left-to-right Controlled Study [NCT05165082]8 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-21Completed
A Randomized Active-controlled Study to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of QLS-101 Versus Timolol Preservative Free (PF) Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Normal Tension Glaucoma (NTG) [NCT04857827]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-15Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-masked 6-month Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed-dose Combination of Tafluprost and Timolol Eye Drops to Those Given Individually in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hyperten [NCT01292460]Phase 3600 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Efficacy of a Timolol Gel in the Care for Epistaxis in Patients With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT04139018]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-20Completed
Efficacy and Safety of 0.25% Timolol Gel in Enhancing Full Thickness Skin Grafts Healing and Cosmetic Outcomes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial [NCT03579160]Phase 2/Phase 310 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-02Terminated(stopped due to Due to the insufficient accrual rate and strategic reasons to focus our efforts on higher impact research projects.)
A Randomized, Single Center, Masked, Crossover Study Comparing the Effects of Latanoprostene Bunod and Timolol on Retinal Blood Vessel Density and Visual Acuity in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT03931317]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-03Completed
Topical Timolol for the Treatment of Benign Vascular Periocular Lesions [NCT01250457]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Unknown, PI has left the institution. There was no enrollment.)
Optimizing Timolol Maleate Treatment of Infantile Hemangioma by Doppler Ultrasound Examination: a Single Center, Open Cohort Study. [NCT03842631]150 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-02-16Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Topical Dorzolamide-Timolol Versus Placebo Combined With Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Injections in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Who Are Inc [NCT03034772]Phase 2/Phase 352 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-08Completed
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Non-inferiority of PRO-122 an Ophthlamic Solution Manufactured by Laboratorios Sophia, Previous Treatment With Krytantek Ofteno ®, in Subjects With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT03257813]Phase 360 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-01Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-masked 6-month Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the Preservative-free Fixed-dose Combination of Tafluprost and Timolol Eye Drops to Those of Tafluprost and Timolol Eye Drops Given Concomitantly in Patients With O [NCT01306461]Phase 3401 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Short Term Intraocular Pressure Fluctuations After Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection: the Effect of Pretreatment With Antiglaucoma Agents [NCT02140450]70 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Impact of Timolol/Dorzolamide Therapy on Autoregulation in Glaucoma Patients [NCT02053298]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-01-31Recruiting
Topical Timolol Gel for the Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas [NCT02145884]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
[NCT01284166]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was never initiated due to company decision. No study subjects were ever enrolled or treated.)
Evaluation of a New Method for Instilling Eye Drops [NCT02697318]Early Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Completed
[NCT00872651]Phase 3242 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Changing to DUOTRAV® (Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% BAK-Free Fixed Combination), as Replacement Therapy in Patients Previously on Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Therapy (Fixed or Unfixed) [NCT01327599]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
A Prospective, Unmasked, Randomized Evaluation of the iStent Versus Two Ocular Hypotensive Agents in Patients With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT00913029]Phase 4192 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Choroidal Thickness and Its Correlations With Ocular Parameters in Cases With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT03966560]Phase 496 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Completed
A Phase 2, Double-masked, Randomized, Active-controlled, Crossover Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of AR-12286 or Timolol Added to Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure Currently Using Latanoprost [NCT01302249]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Six-Week, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% BAC-free Compared to Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00760539]Phase 387 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Necessity of Time Interval Between Instillation of Two Glaucoma Eye Drops [NCT03220490]65 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-11-01Recruiting
African Glaucoma Laser Trial [NCT03648229]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding unavailable)
Comparative Clinical Study of The Safety And Efficacy of A New Fixed-Combination of Timolol-Brimonidine-Dorzolamide In Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01062971]Phase 2124 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A 3-month Study Investigating the 24-hour Efficacy With the Preservative-free Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Dosed Morning, or Evening in Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma Insufficiently Controlled With Latanoprost Monotherapy [NCT03612817]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center, Investigator-Masked, Active-and Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1-2 Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of OT-730 Ophthalmic Solution in Reducing the Intraocular Pressure in Subjects With Ocular Hypertension or Open [NCT00753168]Phase 1/Phase 248 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Efficacy of a Timolol Nasal Spray as a Treatment for Epistaxis in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) - Randomized Trial Versus Placebo [NCT02484716]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
Timolol for the Treatment of Acne and Rosacea [NCT02774590]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
Special Investigation Of Long Term Use Of Xalacom(Regulatory Post Marketing Commitment Plan) [NCT01191008]661 participants (Actual)Observational2010-10-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Using the Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination (DuoTrav®) in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Uncontrolled Ocular Hypertension by Beta-blocker Monotherapy (Timolol 0.5%) [NCT01336569]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Safety Assessment of T4030 Eye Drops Versus Ganfort® UD in Ocular Hypertensive or Glaucomatous Patients. [NCT04898387]Phase 3554 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-26Completed
Absorption and Safety of Topically Applied Timolol for Treatment of Chronic Cutaneous Wounds [NCT04903366]40 participants (Actual)Observational2017-11-21Completed
Evaluation of Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients With Pre-existing Ocular Surface Disease Switched From a Preserved Prostaglandin Analog - Timolol Fixed Combination to a Preservative - Free Latanoprost - Timolol Fixed Combination [NCT04891588]50 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-08Recruiting
A Twelve-Month Open-Label Safety Study of Polyquaternium-Preserved DuoTrav APS Dosed Once Daily in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00928590]Phase 3155 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Al-37807 Ophthalmic Suspension vs. Timolol Gel Forming Solution and Vehicle, All Dosed Concomitantly With Xalatan in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00620256]Phase 2129 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Single Dose Patient Preference Study Comparison in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00576342]Phase 3129 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel-Arm Phase 2b Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of OTX-TP Compared to Timolol Drops in the Treatment of Subjects With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02312544]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Changing to DuoTrav® (Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination) as Replacement Therapy in Patients Uncontrolled on Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Therapy (Fixed or Unfixed) [NCT01230736]Phase 4105 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Circadian Rhythms of Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Humans [NCT00572936]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-13Completed
Stop Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction Study [NCT02390284]Phase 3500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of 0.25% Timolol Gel in Healing Surgical Open Wounds: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03452072]Phase 2/Phase 388 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-08-20Completed
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Timolol in Infants With Infantile Hemangioma (IH) [NCT02913612]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-05Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Adding the Brinzolamide/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination (AZARGA®) to Ocular Hypertensive or Glaucoma Patients Uncontrolled on Prostaglandin Monotherapy [NCT01263444]Phase 447 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Two Elution Rates of Glaukos Travoprost Intraocular Implants to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, USP 0.5% [NCT02754596]Phase 2154 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-29Completed
A 12-Month, Phase 4, Open Label, Multicenter, Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of COMBIGAN® in Korean Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) and Normal Tension Glaucoma (NTG) [NCT02863705]Phase 4118 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-05Completed
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Captopril Versus Propranolol and Timolol as a Treatment of Infantile Capillary Hemangioma [NCT04288700]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-01Recruiting
Phase IV, Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel-group, Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dozolamide 2%/Timolol 0,5% PF vs Dorzolamide 2%/Timolol 0,5% BAK-preserved in OAG or OH [NCT05857267]Phase 484 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-07Recruiting
The International Collaborative Exfoliation Syndrome Treatment Study [NCT00804115]277 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-08-31Active, not recruiting
[NCT00822055]Phase 4140 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
Prospective, Open-label, Single-arm Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy of Timolol and Dorzolamide (COSOPT) as Initial Treatment for Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma [NCT00832377]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-24Completed
A Randomized, Multi-site, Double-masked Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of QLS-111 vs Timolol Maleate Preservative Free 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution and Vehicle in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT06016972]Phase 2120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-29Not yet recruiting
Phase IV Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy of the Krytantek Ofteno PF® Plus Gaap Ofteno PF® Combination to the Krytantek Ofteno PF® Plus Gaap Ofteno PF® Combination, in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients. [NCT04702789]Phase 428 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-19Terminated(stopped due to For interests of sponsor.)
A Six-Week, Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% BAC-free Compared to Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00672997]Phase 3301 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Phase 1B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Combination Bimatoprost/Timolol Ocular Insert Compared to Its Individual Components With Crossover to Timolol 0.5% in Subjects With Open-an [NCT02742649]Phase 1/Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
A Double-masked Study of DE-111 Ophthalmic Solution Versus Tafluprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.0015% Alone and Concomitant Use of Tafluprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.0015% Plus Timolol Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocu [NCT01342081]Phase 3489 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Single Center, Masked, Crossover Study Comparing the Effects of Netarsudil and Timolol on Retinal Blood Vessel Density and Visual Acuity in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT04064918]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Due to COVID-19 related restrictions it was decided to close this study)
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Masked, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Dose-response of the Bimatoprost Implant System Used in Combination With the SpyGlass IOL Compared to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, USP, 0.5% [NCT06120842]Phase 1/Phase 2140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-13Recruiting
Comparison of the Effects of Bimatoprost and a Fixed Combination of Latanoprost and Timolol on 24-hour Blood and Ocular Perfusion Pressures [NCT02154217]Phase 3200 participants (Actual)InterventionalCompleted
Topical Timolol Benefit in Venous Ulcers [NCT02422017]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Beta Adrenergic Antagonist For The Healing of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers [NCT03282981]Phase 335 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-06-14Active, not recruiting
Multicenter, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK0507A in Patients With Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Who Are Inadequately Controlled on Beta-Blockers [NCT00449956]Phase 3474 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-12Completed
Efficacy Of The Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination In Patients Treated With Bimatoprost for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, Exfoliation Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00941096]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Phase III Multi-center, Randomized, Double-masked, Active- and Placebo-controlled Study of Trabodenoson in Adults With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT02565173]Phase 3303 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Parallel, Open-label Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety Effects Using Mikelan® LA Ophthalmic Solution (OS) 2% Versus Timoptol® XE Ophthalmic Solution (OS) 0.5% in Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT00972426]Phase 432 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label Study To Evaluate The Tolerability Of Preservative Free Dorzolamide-Timolol Therapy In Patients Untreated With Open-Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension And Dry Eye(s) [NCT00545064]Phase 4176 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-23Completed
Quality of 24-hour Intraocular Pressure Control Obtained With the Brinzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination Compared With the Brimonidine/Timolol Fixed Combination When Added to Travoprost Monotherapy in Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT00981786]Phase 451 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
A 6-month, Randomized, Double-masked Comparison of PhXA41 With Timolol in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. A Multi-centre Study in the United Kingdom [NCT00751049]Phase 3294 participants (Actual)Interventional1992-12-31Completed
A 6-month, Randomized, Double-masked Comparison of Latanoprost (PhXA41) With Timolol in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. A Multi-centre Study in the United States. [NCT00751127]Phase 3268 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-01-31Completed
24-hour IOP Control With the Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Compared With the Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination, When Both Are Dosed in the Evening in Patients With Exfoliative Glaucoma [NCT00757835]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
[NCT00759239]Phase 436 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Comparison of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty With Prostaglandin Analogues for Lowering Intraocular Pressure in Eyes With Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma [NCT01004900]Phase 390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-06-30Recruiting
A 6-month, Randomized, Double-masked Comparison of Fixed Combination of Latanoprost and Timolol With the Individual Components, Continuing Into a 6-month Open Label Safety Study of Fixed Combination in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. A Mult [NCT00800267]Phase 3418 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-07-31Completed
Phase 3 Study of Brimonidine Tartrate Drops Efficacy in Reducing Post Operative Corneal Edema After Cataract Surgery [NCT00800423]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-01-31Not yet recruiting
12-Month Stability of Diurnal IOP Control on Cosopt [NCT00379834]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Effectiveness and Safety of Timolol and Dorzolamide Loaded Contact Lenses [NCT02852057]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-01-18Completed
Association Between Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use and COVID-19 Severity and Mortality Among US Veterans [NCT04467931]22,213 participants (Actual)Observational2020-01-19Completed
A 12 Week Comparison of DuoTrav and Xalacom at 24 Hours Post-Dose in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma (the DVX Study) [NCT00887029]Phase 454 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Switching to the Travoprost/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination (DUOTRAV®) From Prior Mono or Two-Drug Therapy in Germany [NCT00519753]Phase 4522 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
[NCT00651612]Phase 3604 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Long-term Open-label Study of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution Monotherapy and Concomitant Use of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution With Timolol Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension : RENGE Study [NCT02822729]Phase 3125 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-01Completed
24-hour Efficacy and Ocular Surface Health With PF Tafluprost and Combined Therapy With PF Tafluprost and Dorzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination in Open-angle Glaucoma Subjects Insufficiently Controlled With Latanoprost [NCT02802137]Phase 443 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-03-31Completed
Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Randomised Controlled Trial [NCT00980473]Phase 380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-09-30Recruiting
Phase I Clinical Study, to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of the Preservative-free Ophthalmic Solution PRO-122 Compared With Krytantek Ofteno®, Elaborated by Sophia Laboratories, S.A. of C.V. on the Ocular Surface of Ophthalmologically and Clinicall [NCT03966365]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-05-02Completed
Quality of 24-hour Intraocular Pressure Control Obtained With Dorzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination (DTFC) Compared With the Brimonidine/Timolol Fixed Combination (BTFC) in Subjects With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT00972257]Phase 464 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
[NCT00332384]Phase 3573 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-01-31Completed
Comparison of Bimatoprost 0.03% Monotherapy vs. Dual Therapy With Travoprost 0.004% and Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension [NCT00348023]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
Efficacy and Safety of Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Dosed Twice Daily Compared to Once Daily in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT04098861]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-02Recruiting
A Pilot Study of Adherence Assessment With the Travalert™ Dosing Aid in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Who Are Treated With the Travoprost/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination Every Evening [NCT00676637]55 participants (Actual)Observational2008-05-31Completed
Effects of Topical Hypotensive Drugs on Circadian Ocular Perfusion Pressure and Ocular Blood Flow in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT00800540]Phase 435 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked, 12-Week, Parallel Group Study Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of Latanoprost And Timolol In Pediatric Subjects With Glaucoma. [NCT00716859]Phase 3139 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Efficacy of Topical Latanoprost 0.005% Verses Timolol 0.5% Demonstrated by Corneal Biomechanical Correcting Modified Goldmann Prism [NCT04178863]Phase 472 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-01Recruiting
[NCT01217606]Phase 3185 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Cosopt® Versus Xalacom® on Ocular Hemodynamics and Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma [NCT00815373]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to no participants recruded.)
[NCT00822081]Phase 4140 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Adherence Assessment With the Travalert™ Dosing Aid in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Who Are Treated With the Travoprost/Timolol Maleate Fixed Combination Every Evening [NCT00680329]55 participants (Actual)Observational2008-05-31Completed
Change in Optic Nerve Head Blood Flow,Optic Nerve Topography and Diurnal Fluctuation of Intraocular Pressure and Pulsatile Ocular Blood Flow in Glaucoma:Cosopt and Xalatan vs Xalatan Alone [NCT00957190]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-04Completed
A 6-month, Randomized, Double-masked Comparison of PhXA41 With Timolol in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. A Multi-centre Study in Scandinavia [NCT00751062]Phase 3267 participants (Actual)Interventional1992-11-30Completed
A Phase II Multi-center, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Monocular Addition of Trabodenoson (INO-8875) Ophthalmic Formulation to Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution Therapy in Adults With Ocular Hypertension or Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT01917383]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
The Effect of Paroxetine on the Plasma Levels of Timolol Using Ophthalmic 0.5% Timolol Eye Drops and 0.1% Timolol Eye Gel in Healthy Volunteers [NCT00879099]Phase 112 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
The Efficacy of Timolol 0.5% Gel Forming Solution for the Treatment of Ulcerated Hemangiomas [NCT01408056]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Difficulty with recruitment)
[NCT00862472]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Management decision not to conduct an additional efficacy study.)
A Double-masked Comparison of the Effect of Dorzolamide and Timolol on Optic Disk Blood Flow in Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT00991822]Phase 2/Phase 3160 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-05-31Completed
Comparison of the Effects of Latanoprost and Timolol on Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Ocular Hypertensive Patients [NCT00579969]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study stopped and data not analyzed)
Efficacy and Safety of Topical Timolol Maleate 0.5% Solution for Superficial Infantile Hemangioma in Early Proliferative Phase. A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT02731287]Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-31Completed
A Randomized Active-controlled Multi-site Double-masked Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of 3 Concentrations of QLS-101 Versus Timolol Maleate Preservative Free (PF) 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocu [NCT04830397]Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-31Completed
Assessing the Efficacy of DuoTrav® (Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination), as a Replacement Therapy in Glaucoma Patients in Russia, Previously on Prior Prostaglandin Analogue or Beta-blocker Monotherapy [NCT01696383]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to Management decision)
24-hour Efficacy and Tolerability of the Tafluprost-timolol Fixed Association Without Preservatives in Glaucomatous or Ocular Hypertensive Patients Already Treated With Latanoprost Preserved With BAK. A Prospective, Open Study of 3 Months Duration. [NCT05299593]Phase 443 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-06-04Recruiting
Secondary Prophylaxis of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients Using Thalidomide [NCT00787436]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Withdrawn
Patient Satisfaction With Timolol Maleate in Sorbate, Generic Timolol Gel Forming Solution or Timolol Hemihydrate in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00804648]Phase 430 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Study of a Glaucoma Therapy to Treat Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00326092]Phase 288 participants Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Phase 2b Dose-response of AR-12286 in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pressure for 3 Months [NCT01699464]Phase 2211 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-10-31Completed
A 12 Week, Open-Label, Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Dorzolamide-Timolol as First Line Therapy to Reduce Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Untreated Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG) or Ocular Hypertension (OH) [NCT00546286]Phase 3170 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Cross Over Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Timolol Ophthalmic Solution as an Acute Treatment of Migraine [NCT03836664]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-27Completed
Early Transconjunctival Needling Revision With 5-fluorouracil Versus Medical Treatment in Encapsulated Blebs: a 12-month Prospective Study [NCT01887223]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy Study of BETOPTIC S 0.25% and Timolol Gel-forming Solution 0.25% and 0.5% in Pediatric Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00061542]Phase 3105 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
[NCT00273442]Phase 460 participants Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Determination Of Predictive Factors Allowing To An Additional 10% Reduction Of Intra-Ocular Pressure After A 12-Week Treatment With Latanoprost 0.005% / Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination (Xalacom) In Previously Treated Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma Or Oc [NCT00230763]Phase 3396 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
An 8-Week, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study Comparing The Efficacy And Safety Of Xalacom With The Combination Of Unfixed Latanoprost And Timolol In Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00219596]Phase 3240 participants Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Blood-aqueous Barrier Changes After the Use of Timolol and Prostaglandin Analogues Fixed Combination in Pseudophakic Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma [NCT01978015]Phase 469 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A Phase II, Observer Masked, Active Controlled Study of SYL040012 for the Treatment of Elevated Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02250612]Phase 2184 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Completed
A Phase III, Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled, Twelve-Week, Double-Masked Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Preservative-Free MK2452 (0.0015%) and Preservative-Free Timolol Maleate (0.5%) in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma and [NCT01026831]Phase 3643 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-06Completed
The Effect of Topical Treatment With Combigan Compared to Timolol and Brimonidine on Pupil Diameter [NCT02214680]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-10-31Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Assessment Between BRIDIN- PLUS® Eye Drops and COMBIGAN® Eye Drops in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertensive Patients [NCT06078592]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-08Completed
Topical Anti-angiogenic Therapy for Telangiectasia in HHT: Proof of Concept [NCT01752049]Phase 1/Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-05-31Completed
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Brinzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination (AZARGA™) vs Brinzolamide (AZOPT®) and Timolol in Chinese Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01357616]Phase 3328 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Double-masked Study of DE-111 Ophthalmic Solution Versus Timolol Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension - Phase 3, Confirmatory Study - [NCT01342094]Phase 3166 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
Evaluation of the Safety of GANFORT® (Bimatoprost 0.03% Plus Timolol 0.5%) Ophthalmic Solution in Chinese Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02571712]Phase 4750 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-10Completed
[NCT00652106]Phase 3432 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Completed
The Effect of Reducing the Intraocular Pressure by Using Alphagan Drops and Macular Edema in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema [NCT02718547]25 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-26Recruiting
Trusopt and Cosopt; Ocular Perfusion Pressure and Blood Flow: New Long-term Prospective Data [NCT01145898]56 participants (Actual)Observational2010-06-30Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of Topical Aqueous Suppressants on Intraocular Gas Duration Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy [NCT01257698]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Double-masked Randomized Cross-over Study Comparing of the Effect of Xalacom® (Latanoprost/Timolol)and Combigan® (Brimonidine/Timolol) Fixed Combination on Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Blood Flow in Patients With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular [NCT00706927]16 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Effect of Cosopt Versus Combigan on Retinal Vascular Autoregulation in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) [NCT00824824]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
The Effect of Myocilin Genetic Variants on Intraocular Pressure and Blood Pressure Variation in Sitting and Supine Positions. [NCT00906087]Phase 414 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-04Completed
[NCT00332072]Phase 3541 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
[NCT00332345]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-07-31Completed
[NCT00332540]Phase 3520 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
Effect of Timolol on Refractive Outcomes in Eyes With Myopic Regression After Laser in Situ Keratomileusis: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT01506635]45 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A 6-Month, Randomized, Double-Masked Comparison Of Fixed Combination Of Latanoprost And Timolol With The Individual Components, Continuing Into A 6-Month Open Label Safety Study Of Fixed Combination In Patients With Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00856622]Phase 3436 participants (Actual)Interventional1997-08-31Completed
[NCT01628601]392 participants (Actual)Observational2010-05-31Completed
A Phase 2b Randomized, Double-masked, Active-controlled, Dose-response Study of the Safety and Efficacy of H-1337 in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) or Ocular Hypertension [NCT05913232]Phase 2200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-08-28Recruiting
Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Combigan(Brimonidine/Timolol) and 0.5% Timoptic(Timolol) Ophthalmic Solutions in Normal Tension Glaucoma Patients [NCT01446497]Phase 422 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-10-31Recruiting
A Phase III, Randomized, Active Comparator-Controlled, Four-Week, Double-Masked Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Preservative-Free MK-2452 (0.0015%) and Preservative-Free Timolol Maleate (0.5%) in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or O [NCT01254604]Phase 3190 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-01Completed
[NCT01151904]Phase 417 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty with patient recruitment)
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multi-center Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution Compared With Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% in Subjects With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypert [NCT03691649]Phase 3426 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-14Completed
Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Changing to DuoTrav® (Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% BAK-Free Fixed Combination), as Replacement Therapy in Patients Previously on Prior Prostaglandin Fixed Combination [NCT01514721]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Terminated(stopped due to low enrollment)
A 3-month, 4-centre, Crossover, Double-masked Study Investigating the 24-hour Intraocular Pressure Control With the Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Dosed Morning, or Evening in Subjects With Exfoliative Glaucoma [NCT00486486]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
To Prove the Non-inferiority of Cosopt Compared to Xalatan in the Aspects of Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Subjects With Normal Tension Glaucoma [NCT01175902]44 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Control Obtained With the Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Compared With Latanoprost as First Choice Therapy in Subjects With Exfoliation Syndrome, or Exfoliative Glaucoma [NCT01448837]Phase 437 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Completed
Randomized, Multicenter, Observer-Masked Study to Compare Safety/Efficacy of Nebivolol Suspension 0.5% or 1.0%, or Timolol Suspension 0.5% to Timolol Solution 0.5% in Participants With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT04910100]Phase 2225 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-15Completed
[NCT00332059]Phase 3445 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
Treatment of Cutaneous Hemangioma of Infancy With Topical 0.5% Timolol Maleate Eye Drop Compared With Placebo in Pediatric Patients, Siriraj Hospital [NCT01685398]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Patient Preference Comparison of AZARGA Versus COSOPT After Single Doses in Patients With Open-Angled Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01471158]Phase 4120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
[NCT01170884]Phase 4121 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, 2-period, Parallel Group, Multiple-dose Study to Evaluate the Drug-drugs Interaction Between Dorzolamide and Brimonidine in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers [NCT02967614]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-31Completed
[NCT00273481]Phase 433 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Group Comparison Of Xalacom Given In The Evening, Xalatan Given In The Evening, And Timolol Given In The Morning In Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension In The United States. [NCT00277498]Phase 3528 participants Interventional2005-12-31Completed
[NCT00287521]Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A 12-Month Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Instillation of Combination Glaucoma Therapy in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00311389]Phase 3408 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
[NCT00293800]Phase 3173 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
[NCT00314158]Phase 3523 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) And Blood Pressure Control In Glaucoma And Ocular Hypertension Patients [NCT00330577]Phase 430 participants Interventional2006-04-30Completed
24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Control With Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination [NCT00331240]Phase 332 participants Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Visual Function Changes After Intraocular Pressure Reduction Using Antiglaucoma Medications: A Randomized Clinical Trial [NCT00435058]54 participants Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Randomized, Multicenter, Dbl-Masked, Parallel Study Evaluating the 24 Hr. Diurnal Ocular Hypotensive Effect of 2% Dorzolamide Hydrochloride/0.5% Timolol Maleate Combo. Ophthalmic Sol. in Patients w/ Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00108017]Phase 3330 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
A Crossover, Double-Masked Comparison Investigating the 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Control With the Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Versus Travoprost, When Both Are Given in the Evening, in Subjects With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma [NCT00444184]Phase 432 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Subject- and Examiner-masked, Controlled Clinical Trial Designed to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Bimatoprost Ocular Insert as Compared to Topical Timolol Solution (0.5%) in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocul [NCT01915940]Phase 2169 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-23Completed
[NCT01177098]Phase 3561 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
[NCT01215786]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
Preventing Growth of Hemangioma Tumors in Newborn: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study [NCT01873131]126 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-02-28Recruiting
A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Group Comparison Of Xalacom Given In The Evening, Xalatan Given In The Evening, And Timolol Given In The Morning In Patients With Open Angle Glaucoma Or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00159653]Phase 3500 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of add-on Topical Timolol in the Management of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-induced Paronychia: A Prospective Randomized Open-labelled Trial [NCT06140186]Phase 340 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-01Recruiting
[NCT00333125]Phase 3319 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
[NCT01241240]Phase 3192 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
A Phase 1/2a Randomized, Investigator-masked, Placebo- and Active-controlled, Dose-ranging Study of the Safety and Efficacy of ATS907 in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) and Ocular Hypertension [NCT01520116]Phase 1/Phase 2180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-01-31Active, not recruiting
Treatment of Port-wine Mark in Sturge-Weber Syndrome Using Topical Timolol [NCT01533376]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Terminated
Bimatoprost/Timolol Versus Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combinations in an Egyptian Population: A Hospital-Based Prospective Randomized Study [NCT01542710]80 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Earlier Intraocular Pressure Control After Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation for Glaucoma [NCT00869141]Phase 452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Timolol (A Nonselective Beta-Adrenergic Blocker) vs Placebo to Prevent Complications of Hepatic Portal Hypertension in Patients With Cirrhosis [NCT00006398]Phase 3213 participants (Actual)Interventional1993-08-31Completed
Effects of Common Topical Glaucoma Therapy on Optic Nerve Head Blood Flow Autoregulation During Increased Arterial Blood Pressure and Artificially Elevated Intraocular Pressure in Healthy Humans [NCT00275756]0 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Withdrawn
24-hour IOP With DTFC and LTFC Monotherapies and the Adjunctive Therapy of DTFC and Latanoprost in Open-angle Glaucoma Insufficiently Controlled With Latanoprost Monotherapy. [NCT00397241]Phase 433 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A 6-Week Safety and Efficacy Study of TRAVATAN Compared to XALCOM in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT00051155]Phase 30 participants Interventional2001-01-31Completed
[NCT01881126]Phase 493 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Completed
Adherence of Patients Using Travalert® for Instillation of a Fixed Combination of Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% Compared to a Concomitant Regimen of Travoprost 0.004% and Timolol 0.5% [NCT00508469]Phase 4102 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Combigan With Timolol Adjunctive to Xalatan in Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Subjects [NCT00735449]Phase 4204 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Twelve-Week, Double Masked, Parallel Group, Study of Travoprost 0.004% Compared to Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00763061]Phase 4111 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Comfort Survey of Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients Treated With Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5% Solution Once or Twice Daily Versus Timolol Maleate in Sorbate [NCT00823043]103 participants (Actual)Observational2009-01-31Completed
Study of Travatan and Cosopt in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00471068]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Question raised by Ethics Committee)
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of BOL-303259-X Ophthalmic Solution With Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01749930]Phase 3420 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing the Effects of Topical Aqueous Suppressants on Intraocular Gas Duration Following Scleral Buckling and Pneumatic Retinopexy. [NCT01843920]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
[NCT01987752]732 participants (Actual)Observational2009-01-31Completed
A Double-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Parallel, 12-month Study Assessing the Safety of AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution, 0.02% QD & BID Compared to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5% BID in Patients With Elevated Intraocular Pre [NCT02246764]Phase 393 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-30Completed
[NCT00273429]Phase 40 participants Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Can Urgent Reduction of Intraocular Pressure With Ophthalmic Timolol Improve Recovery From Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION): a Randomized Study. [NCT01607671]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Unable to recruit participants from recruiting sites.)
Patient Preference Comparison of AZARGA Versus COSOPT in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01340014]Phase 4112 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
A Study of Glaucoma Therapy to Treat Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00293787]Phase 3156 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Treatment of Port Wine Stains in Children With Pulsed Dye Laser and Timolol Gel [NCT01272609]Phase 344 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Recruiting
[NCT00273455]Phase 434 participants Interventional2006-01-31Completed
[NCT00811564]Phase 4148 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Multicenter, Double-Masked, 2-Arm Parallel Group Study Comparing the Effect of Brimonidine 0.2% Versus Timolol 0.5% on Visual Field Stability in Patients With Low-Pressure Glaucoma [NCT00317577]Phase 2160 participants Interventional1998-12-31Completed
[NCT00332436]Phase 3586 participants (Actual)Interventional1999-12-31Completed
Effect of Topical Aqueous Suppressants on Response to Intravitreal Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections in Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), Retinal Vein Occlusions (RVO) or Diabetic Macular Edema (DME). [NCT02571972]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-01Completed
Topical Timolol: a Comparison of Surgical Outcomes [NCT05114239]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-07Recruiting
A Study of a Glaucoma Therapy to Treat Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00314171]Phase 3437 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Assessing the Impact of Dosage Frequency of Propranolol on Sleep Patterns in Patients With Infantile Hemangiomas [NCT05479123]Phase 4174 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-23Recruiting
Post Marketing Surveillance Study to Evaluate the Safety Profile of Travacom (Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination) in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Across India [NCT01510132]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Withdrawn
The 24 Control of IOP in Ocular Hypertension: a Cross-over Study on Inflow Versus Outflow Drugs. [NCT01655758]Phase 461 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
A Phase IV Study of Travoprost + Brinzolamide to Treat Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT00471380]Phase 446 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Effect of Topical Glaucoma Therapy on Tear Film Stability in Healthy Subjects [NCT01746602]Phase 338 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Terminated
Effect of Topical Anti-glaucoma Medications on Late Pupillary Light Reflex, as Evaluated by Pupillometry [NCT02522039]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
24-Hour Efficacy of Travoprost/Timolol Benzalkonium Chloride BAK Free Compared With Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Therapy in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma Insufficiently Controlled With Latanoprost Monotherapy [NCT01779284]Phase 442 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
Compliance Study Comparing DuoTrav to TRAVATAN Plus Timolol Using the Dosing Aid [NCT00465803]Phase 381 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
Early Intra Ocular- Pressure Control Using Aqueous Suppressive Agents After Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation [NCT01814514]Phase 294 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-01-31Recruiting
[NCT01068964]235 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-01Completed
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Multi-Arm Feasibility Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of OTX-TP Compared to Timolol Drops in the Treatment of Subjects With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01845038]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A 3 Month, Multicenter, Double-Masked Safety and Efficacy Study of Travoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.004% Compared to Timolol (0.5% or 0.25%) in Pediatric Glaucoma Patients [NCT01652664]Phase 3184 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
[NCT01229462]238 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
[NCT01547598]Phase 4135 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
An Open-Label, Long-Term Phase III Study of STN1012600 Ophthalmic Solution Alone and in Combination With Timolol Ophthalmic Solution, in Subjects With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (Angel-J2 Study) [NCT05503901]Phase 3138 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-08Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Fixed Combination Unpreserved Latanoprost Eye Drops and Timolol 0.5% (T2347) Versus Xalacom® in Ocular Hypertensive or Glaucomatous Patients. [NCT02278614]Phase 3242 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Phase 1 Study of Topical Beta Blocker to Prevent the Proliferative Stage of Infantile Hemangioma [NCT01434849]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty with enrolled patients to complete trial.)
A Phase I, Randomized, Double-masked, 3-period Cross-over Clinical Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of the Preservative-free Fixed Dose Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% Eye Drops to Those of Preservative-fre [NCT01434888]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Timolol Eye Drops in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Headache [NCT02630719]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Unable to enroll sufficient participants)
The Secondary Beneficial Effects of Prostaglandin Analog Treatment in Thyroid Eye Disease Patients. [NCT01927406]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding source unavailable)
Combined Intravitreal Bevacizumab With Topical Timolol-Dorzolamide Eye Drops in Diabetic Macular Edema [NCT05083689]Phase 2/Phase 362 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-06Active, not recruiting
[NCT01243567]Phase 481 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-01Completed
A Phase I/II Dose Escalation Safety and Efficacy Trial of DE-112 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT01279083]Phase 1/Phase 2147 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
A Double-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Parallel, 12-month Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution, 0.02% q.d. and b.i.d. Compared to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5% b.i.d. [NCT02207621]Phase 3756 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled Parallel Group, Multi-center Study of DE-111A (Fixed Dose Combination of Tafluprost and Timolol Eye Drops) on the Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (With Tafluprost Eye Drops as a Comparator) [NCT03822559]Phase 3219 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-20Completed
A Randomized, Single-Center, Open-Label, Crossover Study Comparing the Efficacy of BOL-303259-X Ophthalmic Solution With Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT01707381]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Completed
A Phase 1/2a Assessment of WB007 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT04149899]Phase 1/Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-14Completed
Beta Adrenergic Receptor Modulation of Burn Wound Healing [NCT00368602]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Lack of funding.)
A Phase 2 Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety and Dose-response of the Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (2.2 mg, 13 mg) With and Without Concomitant Artificial Tears Compared to a Placebo Ocul [NCT02358369]Phase 2156 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-19Completed
Preservative-free Fixed-dose Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% / Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Clinical Effectiveness, Tolerability and Safety in a Real World Setting [NCT04828057]50 participants (Actual)Observational2021-09-01Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost SR in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02250651]Phase 3528 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-15Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost SR in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension [NCT02247804]Phase 3594 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-15Completed
Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Switching to AZARGA® (Brinzolamide/Timolol Fixed Combination) as Replacement Therapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Intraocular Pressure in Taiwan [NCT01484951]Phase 474 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
The Effects of Topical Beta Blocker and Prostaglandin on Interval Intraocular Pressure in Intravitreal Injection - a Randomised Controlled Prospective Study [NCT04868175]64 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-01Completed
A Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of DE-126 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% Compared With Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% in Subjects With Primary Open Angle [NCT04742283]Phase 2323 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-17Completed
Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of AZARGA® (Brinzolamide 1%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination) as Replacement Therapy in Patients on COMBIGAN® (Brimonidine 0.2%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination) Therapy in Canada [NCT01415401]Phase 457 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
Topical Timolol 0.5% Solution for Proliferating Infantile Hemangiomas: A Prospective Double Blinded Placebo Controlled Study [NCT01147601]Early Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Terminated
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution Compared With Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% in Subjects With Glaucoma or Ocular Hyperte [NCT03691662]Phase 3417 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-27Completed
[NCT01426113]Phase 36 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated due to corporate decision.)
Aqueous Humor Dynamic Components That Determine Intraocular Pressure Variance [NCT04412096]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-23Recruiting
[NCT01999348]1,553 participants (Actual)Observational2013-11-25Completed
A Multicenter, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Twice-daily 0.01% Bimatoprost/0.15% Brimonidine/0.5% Timolol Ophthalmic Solution (Triple Combination) in Patients in India, Who Have Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension With Elevated IOP, [NCT01216943]Phase 3126 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
[NCT00811850]Phase 415 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
[NCT01976624]756 participants (Actual)Observational2009-08-31Completed
Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of AZARGA® (Brinzolamide 1%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination) as Replacement Therapy in Patients on Brimonidine 0.2%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination Therapy (COMBIGAN®) in Brazil [NCT01514734]Phase 49 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Low recruitment rate)
A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Masked, Parallel-Group Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of BOL-303259-X Ophthalmic Solution With Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. [NCT01749904]Phase 3420 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
Aqueous Humor Dynamic Components That Determine Intraocular Pressure Variance [NCT01677507]Phase 4135 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy With Twice Daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2% (SIMBRINZA®) as an Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% (DUOTRAV®) [NCT02730871]Phase 4173 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-24Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment Challenges)
[NCT02097719]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
The Role of Topical Timolol 0.5% in Wound Healing and Scar Improvement Following Atrophic Acne Scar Microneedling [NCT05597813]30 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-01Not yet recruiting
Prospective, Randomized, Single-Center Study to Evaluate 24-hour Intraocular Pressure Control With Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2% Fixed Dose Combination Therapy [NCT01978600]Phase 489 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
A Double-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Parallel Group, 6-month Study With a 3-month Interim Analysis Assessing the Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy and Safety of AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution, 0.02% QD Compared to Timolol Maleate Ophthalm [NCT02558374]Phase 3708 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Completed
The Efficacy and Safety of Brinzolamide 1%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination Versus Dorzolamide 1%/Timolol 0.5% in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension [NCT02325518]Phase 4218 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of DuoTrav® in Patients Previously Uncontrolled on a Beta-blocker [NCT02003391]Phase 4157 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
A Double-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Active-controlled, Parallel, 3-month Study Assessing the Safety and Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy of AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution, 0.02% Compared to Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5% in Patients With Elevat [NCT02207491]Phase 3411 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-31Completed
Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of AZARGA® (Brinzolamide 1%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination) as Replacement Therapy in Patients on Brimonidine 0.2%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination Therapy (COMBIGAN®) in Latin America [NCT01518244]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00379834 (1) [back to overview]Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Control
NCT00449956 (3) [back to overview]Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline at 8 Weeks
NCT00449956 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Outflow Pressure Reduction Rate at 8 Weeks
NCT00449956 (3) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 Weeks
NCT00471068 (1) [back to overview]Intaocular Pressure (IOP) Mean Change After 6 Weeks of Treatment
NCT00471380 (1) [back to overview]Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT00508469 (1) [back to overview]Adherence
NCT00545064 (4) [back to overview]Change in Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS)-SYMP-6 Score
NCT00545064 (4) [back to overview]Change in Intra-ocular Pressure (IOP) for Worse Eye From Baseline to Week 4 and From Baseline to Week 8, in Patients Receiving Preservative-free Dorzolamide-timolol
NCT00545064 (4) [back to overview]Patient's Global Satisfaction
NCT00545064 (4) [back to overview]Physician's Global Satisfaction
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Uvescleral Outflow
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Aqueous Flow
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Episcleral Venous Pressure
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Anterior Chamber Volume
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Outflow Facility
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Central Corneal Thickness
NCT00572936 (8) [back to overview]Blood Pressure
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Week 4
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 4
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12 (Observed)
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 1
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 15% IOP Reduction From Baseline at Both Weeks 4 and 12
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Therapy Due to a Drug-related Adverse Experience
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Week 12
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Week 1
NCT00716859 (10) [back to overview]Mean IOP at Baseline
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 6
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 12
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Adverse Events
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 6
NCT00735449 (5) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 12
NCT00763061 (4) [back to overview]Week 12 - Mean IOP At 4 PM
NCT00763061 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP Change From Baseline at 9 AM
NCT00763061 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP Change at 4 PM
NCT00763061 (4) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 9 AM
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Vascular Resistance in the Ophthalmic Artery at 6 Weeks
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in End Diastolic Velocity in the Ophthalmic Artery at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Circadian Diastolic Ocular Perfusion Pressure at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Flow Value in the Inverotemporal Peripapillary Retina at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Flow Value in the Superotemporal Peripapillary Retina at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Peak Systolic Velocity in the Central Retinal Artery at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Peak Systolic Velocity in the Ophthalmic Artery at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Diastolic Ocular Perfusion Pressure at Week 6
NCT00800540 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Vascular Resistance in the Central Retinal Artery at Week 6
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Visual Acuity
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Stinging on Instillation
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Corneal Staining Grade
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Corneal Staining Count
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Grade
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Count
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Intraoclular Pressure
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Tear Film Break-up Time
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Grade
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Hyperemia
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Basic Schirmer's
NCT00804648 (12) [back to overview]Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Count
NCT00811564 (1) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Temporal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Central Retinal Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Nasal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Ophthalmic Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Temporal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Central Retinal Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Nasal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery
NCT00811850 (8) [back to overview]Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Ophthalmic Artery
NCT00823043 (4) [back to overview]Subject Reported Burning/Stinging
NCT00823043 (4) [back to overview]Subject Reported Light Sensitivity
NCT00823043 (4) [back to overview]Subject Reported Tearing
NCT00823043 (4) [back to overview]Subject Reported Blurred Vision
NCT00824824 (1) [back to overview]Presence of Retinal Vascular Dysregulation (RVD)
NCT00832377 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change in Trough IOP Measured Right Before Study Drug Administration at Week 12 Compared to Baseline IOP.
NCT00832377 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change in the Peak Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured Two Hours After Study Drug Administration at Week 12 Compared to Baseline IOP.
NCT00832377 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change in IOP 8 Hours After the Study Drug Administration at Week 12 Compared to Baseline IOP
NCT00832377 (4) [back to overview]Baseline IOP
NCT00869141 (3) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure Control After Ahmed Valve Implantation for Glaucoma
NCT00869141 (3) [back to overview]Rate of Hypertensive Phase After Ahmed Valve Implantation for Glaucoma
NCT00869141 (3) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure of Eyes With Hypertensive Phase Versus Without Hypertensive Phase
NCT00906087 (3) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure in Sitting and Supine Positions.
NCT00906087 (3) [back to overview]Blood Pressure in Sitting to Supine Positions
NCT00906087 (3) [back to overview]Myocilin Mutation Arg272Gly in Subjects
NCT01026831 (2) [back to overview]Baseline IOP
NCT01026831 (2) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change From Baseline at All 9 Time Points During the Study (0800, 1000 and 1600 Hrs at Weeks 2, 6, and 12)
NCT01062971 (2) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events
NCT01062971 (2) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01068964 (1) [back to overview]The Difference of Change From Baseline of Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Between the Two Treatment Groups at Week 4
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]3-year Change in OPP
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]6-month Change inOphthalmic Artery (OA) End Diastolic Velocity (EDV)
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]6-month Change in Ophthalmic Artery (OA) Vascular Resistance (RI)
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]6-month Change in Ophthalmic Artery (OA) Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV)
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]6-month Change in Ocular Perfusion Pressures (OPP)
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]6-month Change in Central Retinal Artery (CRA) Vascular Resistance (RI)
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]6-month Change in Central Retinal Artery (CRA) Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV)
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]3-year Change in CRA EDV
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]3-year Change in CRA PSV
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]3-year Change in CRA RI
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]3-year Change in OA EDV
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]3-year Change in OA PSV
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]3-year Change in OA RI
NCT01145898 (14) [back to overview]6-month Change in Central Retinal Artery (CRA) End Diastolic Velocity (EDV)
NCT01147601 (1) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects in Treatment Group Compared to Placebo Group With at Least 75% Improvement in the Extent of the Hemangioma as Compared to Baseline Photos.
NCT01170884 (1) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP), Period 2
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]OPP, Period 2
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Ocular Perfusion Pressure (OPP), Period 1
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Blood Pressure (BP), Period 2
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP), Period 1
NCT01175902 (6) [back to overview]Blood Pressure (BP), Period 1
NCT01177098 (6) [back to overview]Average Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 12
NCT01177098 (6) [back to overview]Average Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 2
NCT01177098 (6) [back to overview]Average Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 6
NCT01177098 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 12
NCT01177098 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 12
NCT01177098 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 12
NCT01191008 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants WithTreatment-Related Adverse Events
NCT01191008 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events Unexpected From Japanese Package Insert
NCT01191008 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Effectiveness Rate
NCT01215786 (3) [back to overview]Mean Concentration of AGN-207281 in Plasma at Day 7
NCT01215786 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Day 14
NCT01215786 (3) [back to overview]Mean Concentration of AGN-207281 in Plasma at Day 14
NCT01216943 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye
NCT01217606 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Analyzed by Two-Sample T-Test
NCT01217606 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Analyzed by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)
NCT01217606 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Analyzed by Mixed-Effect Model for Repeated Measure
NCT01229462 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at Week 4
NCT01241240 (3) [back to overview]Mean Worse Eye IOP
NCT01241240 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12
NCT01241240 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye IOP
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Absolute Difference Between Patient's Lowest IOP Reading at Baseline (Day 0) and the Corresponding IOP Reading
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Average Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline IOP
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Reaching a Predefined Target Pressure Threshold
NCT01243567 (5) [back to overview]Absolute Difference Between Patient's Highest IOP Reading at Baseline (Day 0) and the Corresponding IOP Reading
NCT01254604 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT01254604 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With ≥25% Reduction in IOP From Baseline to Week 4 - Study Eye
NCT01254604 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE
NCT01254604 (4) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP Change From Baseline at Week 4 - Study Eye
NCT01257698 (1) [back to overview]Duration of Intraocular Gas
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP Per Prostaglandin Group at Week 12
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Reaching the Target IOP (≤ 18 mmHg)
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12
NCT01263444 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP of ≤ 18 mmHg in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Hyperemia Score at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01327599 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline
NCT01336569 (1) [back to overview]Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change at the Final Visit From Baseline (Prior Beta-blocker Monotherapy)
NCT01340014 (2) [back to overview]Preferred Treatment
NCT01340014 (2) [back to overview]Ocular Discomfort
NCT01342081 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal IOP(Intraocular Pressure) at End of Study
NCT01342094 (1) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal IOP (Intraocular Pressure) at End of Study
NCT01357616 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP Change From Baseline at 11 AM
NCT01357616 (4) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP Change From Baseline at Week 8
NCT01357616 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP Change From Baseline at 9 AM
NCT01357616 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP Change From Baseline (5 PM) at Week 8
NCT01415401 (2) [back to overview]Change in IOP at the Final Visit From Prior Brimonidine 0.2%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination (COMBIGAN®) Therapy (i.e. From Baseline)
NCT01415401 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP (≤ 18 mmHg)
NCT01484951 (2) [back to overview]Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at the Final Visit From Prior Beta-blocker Monotherapy (Timolol 0.5% Only)
NCT01484951 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Target IOP (≤18 mmHg), Regardless of Prior Therapy
NCT01514734 (1) [back to overview]Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 Weeks From Baseline (Prior Therapy).
NCT01518244 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP (≤18 mmHg) at Week 8
NCT01518244 (2) [back to overview]Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline (Prior Therapy) at Week 8
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 6
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥15% Reduction in Mean Diurnal IOP From Baseline
NCT01547598 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 18 mmHg
NCT01628601 (5) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01628601 (5) [back to overview]Physician Assessment of Tolerability Using a 4-Point Scale
NCT01628601 (5) [back to overview]Physician Assessment of Adherence to GANfort®
NCT01628601 (5) [back to overview]Patients Continuing With GANfort® After 18 Weeks
NCT01628601 (5) [back to overview]Patient Assessment of Tolerability Using a 4-Point Scale
NCT01652664 (1) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 3
NCT01677507 (3) [back to overview]Variation in Episcleral Venous Pressure.
NCT01677507 (3) [back to overview]Variation in Aqueous Flow Between Individuals.
NCT01677507 (3) [back to overview]Variation in Eye Pressure Between Individuals.
NCT01707381 (3) [back to overview]24 Hour IOP
NCT01707381 (3) [back to overview]IOP Area Under the Curve Over 24 Hours
NCT01707381 (3) [back to overview]24-hour Ocular Perfusion Pressure
NCT01749904 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate - IOP Reduction ≥ 25%
NCT01749904 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate - IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg
NCT01749904 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events
NCT01749904 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP
NCT01749930 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events
NCT01749930 (4) [back to overview]IOP Reduction ≥ 25%
NCT01749930 (4) [back to overview]IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg
NCT01749930 (4) [back to overview]Mean IOP
NCT01752049 (1) [back to overview]Change in Lesion Area of Treated Telangiectasia.
NCT01843920 (1) [back to overview]Complete Resolution of Intraocular Gas Bubble
NCT01881126 (1) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM
NCT01915940 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12
NCT01915940 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 2
NCT01915940 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 6
NCT01915940 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 5
NCT01915940 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 4
NCT01915940 (6) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6
NCT01976624 (2) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01976624 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Adverse Drug Reactions
NCT01978600 (3) [back to overview]Mean 24-hour IOP at Week 4
NCT01978600 (3) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 4
NCT01978600 (3) [back to overview]Mean Nocturnal IOP at Week 4
NCT01987752 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events
NCT01987752 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT01999348 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Discontinued Treatment
NCT01999348 (7) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye
NCT01999348 (7) [back to overview]Physician Assessment of IOP-Lowering Effect in the Study Eye Using a 3-Point Scale
NCT01999348 (7) [back to overview]Physician Assessment of Patient Compliance Compared to Previous Treatment on a 3-Point Scale
NCT01999348 (7) [back to overview]Physician Assessment of Tolerability on a 4-Point Scale
NCT01999348 (7) [back to overview]Patient Assessment of Tolerability on a 4-Point Scale
NCT01999348 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Prescribed by the Physician to Continue Treatment
NCT02003391 (3) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP (8AM) at Week 4 in the Study Eye
NCT02003391 (3) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (8AM) at Week 4 in the Study Eye
NCT02003391 (3) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8AM in the Study Eye
NCT02097719 (1) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM
NCT02207491 (2) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT02207491 (2) [back to overview]Extent of Exposure
NCT02207621 (2) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT02207621 (2) [back to overview]Extent of Exposure
NCT02246764 (1) [back to overview]Extent of Exposure
NCT02247804 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hour 2)
NCT02247804 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hours 0 and 2)
NCT02247804 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hour 0)
NCT02247804 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 2 (Hour 2)
NCT02247804 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 2 (Hour 0)
NCT02247804 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 6 (Hour 0)
NCT02247804 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 6 (Hour 2)
NCT02247804 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye
NCT02250612 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Mean Diurnal IOP Within Each Treatment Arm
NCT02250612 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Glaucoma Quality of Life Questionnaire (GQL-15) Scores Within Each Treatment Arm
NCT02250612 (3) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in the Mean Diurnal IOP Within Each Treatment Arm
NCT02250651 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 6 (Hour 2)
NCT02250651 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye to Week 12 (Hours 0 and 2)
NCT02250651 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye
NCT02250651 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 6 (Hour 0)
NCT02250651 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hour 2)
NCT02250651 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 2 (Hour 2)
NCT02250651 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hour 0)
NCT02250651 (8) [back to overview]IOP in the Study Eye at Week 2 (Hour 0)
NCT02278614 (1) [back to overview]Non-inferiority of T2347 Compared With Xalacom® on Change in Mean IOP at 9.00 am (± 1 Hour) Between the Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84 in the Worse Eye
NCT02325518 (2) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 9 AM
NCT02325518 (2) [back to overview]Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 11 AM
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Dilated Fundus Exam: Cup-to-Disc-Ratio
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Slit-Lamp Examination Findings at Week 12
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Automated Visual Field at Week 12
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 8
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 6
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP in Period C
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Categories at Week 12
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Categories at Week 8
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 2
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events (AE) by Severity in Period A/B
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events (AE) by Severity in Period C
NCT02358369 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants by Dilated Fundus Exam Pathology Grade at Week 12
NCT02558374 (2) [back to overview]IOP (Intraocular Pressure)
NCT02558374 (2) [back to overview]Extent of Exposure
NCT02571972 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment Height
NCT02571972 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Subretinal Fluid Height
NCT02571972 (4) [back to overview]Mean Central Subfield Thickness (CST)
NCT02571972 (4) [back to overview]Visual Acuity
NCT02630719 (1) [back to overview]Timolol Eye Drops in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Headache
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP at Week 6
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (09:00, 11:00) at Week 6
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP (09:00, 11:00) at Week 6
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) (Mean of Changes at 09:00 and 11:00 Time Points) at Week 6
NCT02730871 (5) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 6
NCT02742649 (7) [back to overview]IOP on Day 28
NCT02742649 (7) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) on Day 8
NCT02742649 (7) [back to overview]IOP During Open Label Period
NCT02742649 (7) [back to overview]IOP on Day 16
NCT02742649 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Ocular and Non-Ocular Adverse Events
NCT02742649 (7) [back to overview]IOP on Day 70
NCT02742649 (7) [back to overview]IOP on Day 49
NCT02754596 (2) [back to overview]Severe Adverse Events
NCT02754596 (2) [back to overview]IOP (mmHg) Change From Baseline at Week 12
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Change in Hemangioma Quality of Life (IH-QoL) Assessment for Infants
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Change in Hemangioma Dynamic Complication Scale (HDCS)
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partial Response in Hemangioma Color as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm and Compared With Untreated Controls
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partial Response of Hemangioma Volume as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm and Compared With Untreated Controls
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partial Response of Hemangioma Volume as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Comparison of Partial Response of Hemangioma Color From Baseline to 180 Days, Within Each Treatment Arm
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reach Partial Response, Assessed by Hemangioma Color
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Reach Partial Response, Assessed by Volume
NCT02913612 (9) [back to overview]Number of Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events of Special Interest in Infants Treated With Topical Timolol Maleate
NCT03034772 (5) [back to overview]Change in Visual Acuity
NCT03034772 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean Maximum Subretinal Fluid (SRF) Height
NCT03034772 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Height
NCT03034772 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT03034772 (5) [back to overview]Change in Mean Central Subfield Thickness (CST)
NCT03257813 (8) [back to overview]Number of Eyes With Foreign Body Sensation
NCT03257813 (8) [back to overview]Number of Eyes With Tearing
NCT03257813 (8) [back to overview]Visual Acuity (VA)
NCT03257813 (8) [back to overview]Conjunctival Hyperemia
NCT03257813 (8) [back to overview]Chemosis
NCT03257813 (8) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT03257813 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
NCT03257813 (8) [back to overview]Eye Burning
NCT03323164 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Percent Changes in Optic Nerve Head Flow Index in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography
NCT03323164 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Percent Changes in Optic Nerve Head Vessel Density in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography
NCT03323164 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Percent Changes in Peripapillary Vessel Density in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography
NCT03323164 (6) [back to overview]Comparison of Percent Changes in Peripapillary Flow Index in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography
NCT03323164 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Vessel Density in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography
NCT03323164 (6) [back to overview]Changes in Flow Index in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography
NCT03691649 (8) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 (Third Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03691649 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03691649 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03691649 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure at Month 3
NCT03691649 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure at Week 1
NCT03691649 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure at Week 6
NCT03691649 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03691649 (8) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 (First Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03691662 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6
NCT03691662 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03691662 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1
NCT03691662 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03691662 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3
NCT03691662 (8) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 (Third Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03691662 (8) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 (First Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03691662 (8) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)
NCT03836664 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants Satisfied With Intervention
NCT03836664 (3) [back to overview]Adverse Reaction From Using Timolol Eye Drops
NCT03836664 (3) [back to overview]Headache Severity
NCT03966365 (7) [back to overview]Changes in Intraocular Pressure
NCT03966365 (7) [back to overview]Eye Comfort Index
NCT03966365 (7) [back to overview]Number of Adverse Events
NCT03966365 (7) [back to overview]Participants With Chemosis
NCT03966365 (7) [back to overview]Visual Ability
NCT03966365 (7) [back to overview]Number of Eyes With Epithelial Defects by Grade
NCT03966365 (7) [back to overview]Participants With Conjunctival Hyperemia (CH) by Grade
NCT04139018 (1) [back to overview]Change in Assisted Epistaxis Severity Scale (aESS) Score From Baseline at 8 Week Follow-up
NCT04149899 (2) [back to overview]Part 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Day 14 - Study Eye
NCT04149899 (2) [back to overview]Part 2: Mean IOP at Day 14 - Study Eye
NCT04742283 (4) [back to overview]Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure at Month 3
NCT04742283 (4) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure at Month 3
NCT04742283 (4) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure at Week 6
NCT04742283 (4) [back to overview]Intraocular Pressure at Week 2

Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Control

Change from baseline in mean diurnal IOP (measured every two hours from 8AM to 8PM) averaged across on-treatment study visits (week 1, months 1, 6, 12) (NCT00379834)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmillimeters of mercury (Mean)
Cosopt-4.4

[back to top]

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline at 8 Weeks

Change from baseline to 8 weeks in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) assessed 2 hours after ocular instillation (at Hour 2) (NCT00449956)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
MK0507A (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5% Combination)-2.50
Timolol 0.5%-1.82
Concomitant (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5%)-2.78

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Outflow Pressure Reduction Rate at 8 Weeks

Percent Change from baseline to 8 weeks in Outflow Pressure Reduction Rate assessed 2 hours after ocular instillation (at Hour 2) (NCT00449956)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
MK0507A (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5% Combination)23.47
Timolol 0.5%17.17
Concomitant (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5%)26.75

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 Weeks

Percent Change from baseline to 8 weeks in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) assessed 2 hours after ocular instillation (at Hour 2) (NCT00449956)
Timeframe: 8 Weeks

InterventionPercent Change (Least Squares Mean)
MK0507A (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5% Combination)-11.99
Timolol 0.5%-8.74
Concomitant (Dorzolamide 1.0% / Timolol 0.5%)-13.46

[back to top]

Intaocular Pressure (IOP) Mean Change After 6 Weeks of Treatment

IOP measured at week 6 minus IOP measured at baseline (NCT00471068)
Timeframe: At week 0 and week 6

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Travatan-4.57
Cosopt-4.08

[back to top]

Intra Ocular Pressure (IOP)

Intra Ocular Pressure, calculated as AUC (area under the curve) of IOP measured from 8.00 a.m. to 8.00 p.m, at different time-points (NCT00471380)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of each period (week 8, week 16, week 24)

,
Interventionmm Hg (millimeters mercury)*week (Mean)
Week 8Week 16Week 24
Crossover Group ABB179.20188.82201.50
Crossover Group BAA191.89196.26191.93

[back to top]

Adherence

Patients were considered adherent if a minimum of 80% of their instillations were administered ±2 hours of the scheduled time. (NCT00508469)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of adherent patients (Number)
Travalert With Travoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination63
Travalert With Travoprost and Timolol43

[back to top]

Change in Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS)-SYMP-6 Score

GSS-SYMP-6 measures 6 non-visual adverse symptoms related to glaucoma medications, with 10 5-point Likert scale questions. Score ranges between 0 and 100, lower scores indicating higher symptoms severity. Change equals post-baseline value minus baseline. (NCT00545064)
Timeframe: Baseline to week 8

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Preservative-free Dorzolamide-timolol (COSOPT®) Week 41.7
Preservative-free Dorzolamide-timolol (COSOPT®) Week 83.2

[back to top]

Change in Intra-ocular Pressure (IOP) for Worse Eye From Baseline to Week 4 and From Baseline to Week 8, in Patients Receiving Preservative-free Dorzolamide-timolol

IOP measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry, performed by a masked physician two hours after patient was administered study medication. Change is computed as week 4 (or week 8) value minus baseline value. (NCT00545064)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4 and from Baseline to Week 8

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Preservative-free Dorzolamide-timolol (COSOPT®) Week 4-11.7
Preservative-free Dorzolamide-timolol (COSOPT®) Week 8-11.5

[back to top]

Patient's Global Satisfaction

At week 8, patients were asked to complete a single question describing how satisfied they were regarding with their medication, on a 5-level scale: very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied. (NCT00545064)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Very SatisfiedSatisfiedNeither Satisfied or DissatisfiedDissatisfiedVery DissatisfiedMissing
Preservative-free COSOPT® at Week 8796511636

[back to top]

Physician's Global Satisfaction

At week 8, physicians were asked to complete a single question describing how satisfied they were regarding their patient's treatment, on a 5-level scale: very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied. (NCT00545064)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Very SatisfiedSatisfiedNeither Satisfied or DissatisfiedDissatisfiedVery DissatisfiedMissing
Preservative-free COSOPT® at Week 8130525523

[back to top]

Uvescleral Outflow

uvescleral outflow was calulated using goldmann equation (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionµL/min per mm Hg (Mean)
day time fluorophotometrydaytime tonographynight tonography
Dorzolamide0.140.580.12
Latanoprost0.430.900.26
Timolol-0.160.700.50

[back to top]

Aqueous Flow

aqueous flow measurements was calculated using fluorophotometry measurements. (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionμL/min (Mean)
day timenight time
Dorzolamide1.751.1
Latanoprost2.091.1
Timolol1.571.1

[back to top]

Episcleral Venous Pressure

Episcleral venous pressure was measured by venomenometry (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Latanoprost9.4
Timolol9.6
Dorzolamide9.4

[back to top]

Anterior Chamber Volume

Anterior chamber volume was measured by A-scan ultrasound biometry, daytime (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

InterventionμL (Mean)
Latanoprost191
Timolol191
Dorzolamide198

[back to top]

Outflow Facility

outflow facility was calculated using fluorophotometry and tonography (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionµL/min per mm Hg (Mean)
day time fluorophotometrydaytime tonographynight tonography
Dorzolamide0.210.200.18
Latanoprost0.230.220.21
Timolol0.230.180.17

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure

Intra-ocular Pressure was measured by applanation tonometry (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
DaytimeNight time
Dorzolamide20.217.6
Latanoprost17.617.0
Timolol16.417.1

[back to top]

Central Corneal Thickness

central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
Interventionμm (Mean)
day timenight time
Dorzolamide564582
Latanoprost564585
Timolol568586

[back to top]

Blood Pressure

blood pressure was measured by sphygmomanometry (NCT00572936)
Timeframe: 2 weeks

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
systolic day timesystolic night timediastolic day timediastolic night time
Dorzolamide1391388382
Latanoprost1361437883
Timolol1381368179

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Week 4

IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol21.5
Latanoprost20.1

[back to top]

Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 4

Calculated as Baseline IOP minus Week 4 IOP (observed). IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol5.37
Latanoprost6.99

[back to top]

Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12, Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

Calculated as Baseline IOP minus Week 12 IOP, LOCF. IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were less than or equal to (≤) 2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol5.72
Latanoprost7.18

[back to top]

Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12 (Observed)

Calculated as Baseline IOP minus Week 12 IOP (observed). IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol6.96
Latanoprost7.75

[back to top]

Reduction From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 1

Calculated as Baseline IOP minus Week 1 IOP (observed). IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol6.02
Latanoprost6.70

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 15% IOP Reduction From Baseline at Both Weeks 4 and 12

Participants with ≥15% IOP reduction from baseline at both Week 4 and Week 12. Calculated as (post baseline IOP minus baseline IOP) divided by IOP, multiplied by 100%. IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Timolol52
Latanoprost60

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean IOP at Week 12

IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol19.8
Latanoprost19.2

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Week 1

IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol21.7
Latanoprost20.6

[back to top]

Mean IOP at Baseline

IOP measured using 1 of 3 methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry (preferred method, if feasible), Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen. IOP was measured twice and if the measurements were ≤ 2 mmHg of each other, the mean of the 2 readings was recorded as the IOP at that time point. Otherwise, a third IOP measurement was taken and the median IOP recorded. (NCT00716859)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol27.8
Latanoprost27.3

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 6

Mean IOP at 10 AM at week 6. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®15.9
Timolol Maleate 0.5%16.7

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 10 AM at Week 12

Mean IOP at 10 AM at week 12. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure in the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®15.1
Timolol Maleate 0.5%16.9

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events

Number of subjects with adverse events, defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, during the study (reported through the week 12 visit). (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Combigan®15
Timolol Maleate 0.5%13

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 6

Mean IOP at 8 AM at week 6. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®17.3
Timolol Maleate 0.5%17.8

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 AM at Week 12

Mean IOP at 8 AM at week 12. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00735449)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Combigan®17.0
Timolol Maleate 0.5%17.7

[back to top]

Week 12 - Mean IOP At 4 PM

Bilateral IOP measurements by Goldmann applanation were performed at 9AM and 4 PM. Two IOP measurements were taken and averaged. If the difference between the first and second reading was greater than 4 mmHg, a third reading was taken and the two nearest readings averaged. (NCT00763061)
Timeframe: At the 4 PM time point for the patient's worse eye.

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost 0.004%15.7
Timolol 0.5%17.9

[back to top]

Mean IOP Change From Baseline at 9 AM

Bilateral IOP measurements by Goldmann applanation were performed at 9AM and 4 PM. Two IOP measurements were taken and averaged. If the difference between the first and second reading was greater than 4 mmHg, a third reading was taken and the two nearest readings averaged. (NCT00763061)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - at 9 AM

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost 0.004%-5.1
Timolol 0.5%-4.4

[back to top]

Mean IOP Change at 4 PM

Bilateral IOP measurements by Goldmann applanation were performed at 9AM and 4 PM. Two IOP measurements were taken and averaged. If the difference between the first and second reading was greater than 4 mmHg, a third reading was taken and the two nearest readings averaged. (NCT00763061)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12 - at 4 PM

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost 0.004%-5.3
Timolol 0.5%-3.7

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 9 AM

Bilateral IOP measurements by Goldmann applanation were performed at 9AM and 4 PM. Two IOP measurements were taken and averaged. If the difference between the first and second reading was greater than 4 mmHg, a third reading was taken and the two nearest readings averaged. (NCT00763061)
Timeframe: At Week 12 - At the 9 AM time point for the patient's worse eye.

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Travoprost 0.004%16.3
Timolol 0.5%18.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Vascular Resistance in the Ophthalmic Artery at 6 Weeks

Vascular resistance in the ophthalmic artery was assessed using Color Doppler Imaging (CDI). Assessments were made at 7 time points over a 24-hour period. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
Interventioncm/s (centimeters per second) (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm12:00 am3:00 am6:00 am
AZARGA-0.010.020.010.01-0.010.010.01
COMBIGAN-0.010.020.010.010.020.030.03

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in End Diastolic Velocity in the Ophthalmic Artery at Week 6

End diastolic velocity in the ophthalmic artery was assessed using Color Doppler Imaging (CDI). Assessments were made at 7 time points over a 24-hour period. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
Interventioncm/s (centimeters per second) (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm12:00 am3:00 am6:00 am
AZARGA-0.0-0.60.50.4-0.8-0.1-0.2
COMBIGAN-0.8-1.20.2-0.8-1.4-0.6-0.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Circadian Diastolic Ocular Perfusion Pressure at Week 6

Circadian diastolic ocular perfusion pressure (COPP) is defined as the variations in diastolic OPP during the day and night. Diastolic ocular perfusion pressure was calculated at 7 timepoints over a 24-hour period. Changes in the diastolic ocular perfusion pressure rhythm throughout the day (outside the normal range) may affect glaucoma progression. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
InterventionmmHg (millimeters of mercury) (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm12:00 am3:00 am6:00 am
AZARGA2.83.04.44.50.80.32.0
COMBIGAN6.52.13.92.0-5.6-4.00.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 6

Blood pressure is defined as the pressure exerted by circulating blood upon the walls of the blood vessels, that is, arterial pressure of the systemic circulation of blood. Diastolic blood pressure refers to the minimum pressure, that is, the pressure between heartbeats. Diastolic glood pressure was measured at 7 timepoints in a 24-hour period using a calibrated sphygmomonometer. Higher blood pressure (outside the normal range) can be a risk factor for developing cardiovascular events, such as heart attack, stroke, or heart failure. Lower blood pressure (outside the normal range) can be a risk factor for dizziness or fainting. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
InterventionmmHg (millimeters of mercury) (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm12:00 am3:00 am6:00 am
AZARGA-3.3-3.5-1.5-0.5-1.4-1.5-0.5
COMBIGAN0.6-4.3-0.9-2.1-7.3-3.8-0.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is defined as the fluid pressure inside the eye. Intraocular pressure was measured with a calibrated pneumatonometer at 7 time points over a 24-hour period. High IOP (outside the normal range) can be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
InterventionmmHg (millimeters of mercury) (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm12:00 am3:00 am6:00 am
AZARGA-6.3-6.0-5.6-4.3-1.9-1.3-2.3
COMBIGAN-6.5-6.5-5.2-4.9-1.6-0.6-1.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Flow Value in the Inverotemporal Peripapillary Retina at Week 6

Retinal perfusion assessments were made using Heidelberg Retinal Flowmetry (HRF). Assessments were made at 4 timepoints over a 12-hour period. Intensity of blood flow was measured in arbitrary units, with a higher number indicating an increased blood flow. An increase in ocular blood flow may reduce the risk of glaucoma progression. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm
AZARGA15.9-40.7-38.7182.3
COMBIGAN-70.0-89.2-69.1-91.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Mean Flow Value in the Superotemporal Peripapillary Retina at Week 6

Retinal perfusion assessments were made using Heidelberg Retinal Flowmetry (HRF). Assessments were made at 4 timepoints over a 12-hour period. Intensity of blood flow was measured in arbitrary units, with a higher number indicating an increased blood flow. An increase in ocular blood flow may reduce the risk of glaucoma progression. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
InterventionArbitrary Units (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm
AZARGA-272.4-12.1-26.714.0
COMBIGAN-43.5248.9-51.3-33.2

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Peak Systolic Velocity in the Central Retinal Artery at Week 6

Peak systolic velocity in the central retinal artery was assessed using Color Doppler Imaging (CDI). Assessments were made at 7 time points over a 24-hour period. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
Interventioncm/s (centimeters per second) (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm12:00 am3:00 am6:00 am
AZARGA0.9-0.21.00.91.90.20.2
COMBIGAN0.70.30.6-0.5-0.5-1.10.9

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Peak Systolic Velocity in the Ophthalmic Artery at Week 6

Peak systolic velocity in the ophthalmic artery was assessed using Color Doppler Imaging (CDI). Assessments were made at 7 time points over a 24-hour period. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
Interventioncm/s (centimeters per second) (Median)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm12:00 am3:00 am6:00 am
AZARGA-1.0-0.72.22.2-2.30.2-0.6
COMBIGAN-3.8-1.41.3-1.4-3.10.01.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 6

Blood pressure is defined as the pressure exerted by circulating blood upon the walls of the blood vessels, that is, arterial pressure of the systemic circulation of blood. Systolic blood pressure refers to the maximum pressure, that is, the pressure while the heart is beating, and was measured at 7 timepoints in a 24-hour period using a calibrated sphygmomonometer. Higher blood pressure (outside the normal range) can be a risk factor for developing cardiovascular events, such as heart attack, stroke, or heart failure. Lower blood pressure (outside the normal range) can be a risk factor for dizziness or fainting. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
InterventionmmHg (millimeters of mercury) (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm12:00 am3:00 am6:00 am
AZARGA-4.2-2.6-2.9-1.4-2.9-2.9-0.1
COMBIGAN4.5-1.9-0.4-0.6-12.2-3.03.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Diastolic Ocular Perfusion Pressure at Week 6

Diastolic ocular perfusion pressure (DOPP) is defined as the difference between diastolic arterial pressure and intraocular pressure. Diastolic arterial pressure was measured with a calibrated automated sphygmomanometer. Intraocular pressure was measured with a calibrated pneumatonometer. A lower DOPP indicates a lower optic blood supply, which can be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

InterventionmmHg (millimeters of mercury) (Mean)
AZARGA2.6
COMBIGAN0.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Vascular Resistance in the Central Retinal Artery at Week 6

Vascular resistance in the central retinal artery was assessed using Color Doppler Imaging (CDI). Assessments were made at 7 time points over a 24-hour period. (NCT00800540)
Timeframe: Week 0, Week 6 (period-based)

,
Interventioncm/s (centimeters per second) (Mean)
9:00 am1:00 pm5:00 pm9:00 pm12:00 am3:00 am6:00 am
AZARGA-0.00-0.010.000.000.020.01-0.02
COMBIGAN0.010.01-0.000.02-0.010.010.02

[back to top]

Visual Acuity

The visual acuity score is a count of the number of letters the subject successfully read from the eye chart. The higher the score, the better the vision. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionnumber of letters (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%52.3
Timolol Maleate 0.5%52.5
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%51.4

[back to top]

Stinging on Instillation

Assessed from subject response to survey question asking about tolerability of medicine upon instillation, using a 0 through 7 scale, with 0=complete comfort and 7=worst pain imaginable. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%0.6
Timolol Maleate 0.5%1.0
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%0.6

[back to top]

Corneal Staining Grade

Assessed by the investigator using a slit lamp and Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5. The higher the grade the worse the staining. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%1.2
Timolol Maleate 0.5%1.1
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%1.0

[back to top]

Corneal Staining Count

Assessed by the investigator using a slit lamp, counting the number of spots. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionNumber of spots (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%10.5
Timolol Maleate 0.5%10.4
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%8.3

[back to top]

Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Grade

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5 according to pictures provided. The higher the grade the worse the staining. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%0.8
Timolol Maleate 0.5%0.7
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%0.8

[back to top]

Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Count

Assessed by investigator using slit lamp and counting number of spots. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionnumber of spots (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%11.0
Timolol Maleate 0.5%10.3
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%12.9

[back to top]

Intraoclular Pressure

(NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionmm of mercury (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%16.3
Timolol Maleate 0.5%16.2
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%16.2

[back to top]

Tear Film Break-up Time

(NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionSeconds (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%8.5
Timolol Maleate 0.5%7.7
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%8.5

[back to top]

Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Grade

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and the Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5 according to pictures provided. The higher the grade the worse the staining. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%1.2
Timolol Maleate 0.5%1.1
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%1.3

[back to top]

Conjunctival Hyperemia

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and a photographic grading scale. Photographs were graded: grade 0, grade 1, grade 2, grade 3. The higher the graded the worse the hyperemia. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%0.2
Timolol Maleate 0.5%0.4
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%0.3

[back to top]

Basic Schirmer's

Schirmer's measures basic tear function. The higher the number, the less dry the eye. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionmm of moisture (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%17.7
Timolol Maleate 0.5%14.8
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%15.4

[back to top]

Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Count

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and counting number of spots. (NCT00804648)
Timeframe: following 3 days of treatment

Interventionnumber of spots (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%4.7
Timolol Maleate 0.5%4.8
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%5.3

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12

Mean IOP at week 12. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT00811564)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Fixed Combination of Brimonidine Tartrate 0.2%/Timolol Maleate17.75
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution17.90

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Temporal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery

Peak systolic velocity (PSV) of retrobulbar blood as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the temporal short posterior ciliary artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. PSV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the time of systole (maximum pressure exerted in the blood vessel). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®8.52
Cosopt®8.84

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Central Retinal Artery

End diastolic velocity (EDV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the central retinal artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. EDV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the end of diastole (minimum pressure exerted in a blood vessel in between heart beats). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®2.73
Cosopt®2.75

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Nasal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery

End diastolic velocity (EDV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the nasal short posterior ciliary artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. EDV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the end of diastole (minimum pressure exerted in a blood vessel in between heart beats). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®2.63
Cosopt®2.61

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Ophthalmic Artery

End diastolic velocity (EDV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the ophthalmic artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow through a vessel. EDV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the end of diastole (minimum pressure exerted in a blood vessel in between heart beats). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®5.83
Cosopt®5.18

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (End Diastolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Temporal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery

End diastolic velocity (EDV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the temporal short posterior ciliary artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. EDV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the end of diastole (minimum pressure exerted in a blood vessel in between heart beats). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®2.73
Cosopt®2.87

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Central Retinal Artery

Peak systolic velocity (PSV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the central retinal artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. PSV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the time of systole (maximum pressure exerted in a blood vessel). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®8.86
Cosopt®8.81

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Nasal Short Posterior Ciliary Artery

Peak systolic velocity (PSV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the nasal short posterior ciliary artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. PSV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the time of systole (maximum pressure exerted in a blood vessel). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®8.61
Cosopt®8.02

[back to top]

Retrobulbar Blood Flow (Peak Systolic Velocity) as Measured by Color Doppler Imaging in the Ophthalmic Artery

Peak systolic velocity (PSV) of retrobulbar blood flow as measured by color Doppler imaging (CDI) in the ophthalmic artery after 1 month of treatment. CDI is a high-resolution ultrasound system which provides visualization of the flow of blood through a vessel. PSV is the maximum blood flow speed within a vessel at the time of systole (maximum pressure exerted in a blood vessel). (NCT00811850)
Timeframe: 1 Month

InterventionCentimeters per second (cm/s) (Mean)
Combigan®24.5
Cosopt®22.09

[back to top]

Subject Reported Burning/Stinging

Subjects reported burning/stinging after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always. (NCT00823043)
Timeframe: Upon instillation

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate1.1
Timolol Maleate in Sorbate2.4

[back to top]

Subject Reported Light Sensitivity

Subjects reported light hurt their eyes after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always. (NCT00823043)
Timeframe: Upon instillation

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate0.5
Timolol Maleate in Sorbate0.4

[back to top]

Subject Reported Tearing

Subjects reported tearing after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale:0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always. (NCT00823043)
Timeframe: Upon instillation.

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate0.9
Timolol Maleate in Sorbate1.6

[back to top]

Subject Reported Blurred Vision

Subjects reported their vision was blurred after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always. (NCT00823043)
Timeframe: Upon instillation

InterventionUnits on a Scale (Mean)
Timolol Hemihydrate0.7
Timolol Maleate in Sorbate0.6

[back to top]

Presence of Retinal Vascular Dysregulation (RVD)

We determined whether RVD was present in the following way. The difference between the retinal blood flow measured while reclining for 30 minutes and the baseline retinal blood flow measured while seated was calculated. In a previous study, we found that among healthy subjects the change in the blood flow while reclining compared to baseline was +6.5% ± 12%. For this study, we defined the normal range of blood flow autoregulation as ± 2 standard deviations about the mean percentage change found in the control group in the initial study (6.5% ± 24.0%); that is, as -17.5% to +30.5%. Participants with a change in retinal blood flow induced by posture change outside this range were randomized to either dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination BID OU or brimonidine-timolol fixed combination BID OU for 6 weeks. (NCT00824824)
Timeframe: 6 weeks post treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Dorzolamide-Timolol7
Brimonidine-Timolol4

[back to top]

Mean Change in Trough IOP Measured Right Before Study Drug Administration at Week 12 Compared to Baseline IOP.

"The therapeutic goal of normal tension glaucoma treatment includes lowering IOP to prevent progression of damage in optic nerves or vision. In this trial, IOP was measured with the same tonometer throughout the study. A decreased IOP from baseline is considered an improvement.~IOP was measured in both eyes and the eye with the higher IOP was used for the participant." (NCT00832377)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol/Dorzolamide-3.22

[back to top]

Mean Change in the Peak Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured Two Hours After Study Drug Administration at Week 12 Compared to Baseline IOP.

"The therapeutic goal of normal tension glaucoma treatment includes lowering IOP to prevent progression of damage in optic nerves or vision. In this trial, IOP was measured with the same tonometer throughout the study. A decreased IOP from baseline is considered an improvement.~IOP was measured in both eyes and the eye with the higher IOP was used for the participant." (NCT00832377)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol/Dorzolamide-3.73

[back to top]

Mean Change in IOP 8 Hours After the Study Drug Administration at Week 12 Compared to Baseline IOP

"The therapeutic goal of normal tension glaucoma treatment includes lowering IOP to prevent progression of damage in optic nerves or vision. In this trial, IOP was measured with the same tonometer throughout the study. A decreased IOP from baseline is considered an improvement.~IOP was measured in both eyes and the eye with the higher IOP was used for the participant." (NCT00832377)
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol/Dorzolamide-3.78

[back to top]

Baseline IOP

"Baseline IOP was measured at ~9 AM of first day of treatment period.~IOP was measured in both eyes and the eye with the higher IOP was used for the participant." (NCT00832377)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Timolol/Dorzolamide15.60

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure Control After Ahmed Valve Implantation for Glaucoma

intraocular pressure comparison between groups after the Ahmed valve implantation (NCT00869141)
Timeframe: 3 weeks after surgery

InterventionmmHg at postop 3-week (Mean)
Research Arm15.6
Standard of Care Arm20.6

[back to top]

Rate of Hypertensive Phase After Ahmed Valve Implantation for Glaucoma

Intraocular pressure more than 21 mmHg during the first 6 months after Ahmed valve implantation after the pressure has been reduced to less than 22 mmHg in the first postoperative week (NCT00869141)
Timeframe: within 6 months after surgery

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Research Arm9
Standard of Care Arm12

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure of Eyes With Hypertensive Phase Versus Without Hypertensive Phase

intraocular pressure of eyes with hypertensive phase versus without hypertensive phase (NCT00869141)
Timeframe: 1 year after surgery

InterventionmmHg in 1 year postop (Mean)
Hypertensive Phase Group15.1
Non-hypertensive Phase Group11.4

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure in Sitting and Supine Positions.

Effect of Cosopt treatment on intraocular pressure changes in sitting to supine positions. (NCT00906087)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Sitting right eyeSitting left eyeSupine right eyeSupine left eye
Cosopt18.519.422.222.8

[back to top]

Blood Pressure in Sitting to Supine Positions

Effect of Cosopt treatment on blood pressure changes in sitting to supine positions. (NCT00906087)
Timeframe: 10 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Sitting systolic blood pressureSupine systolic blood pressureSitting diastolic blood pressureSupine diastolic blood pressure
Cosopt139.6133.886.889.3

[back to top]

Myocilin Mutation Arg272Gly in Subjects

Number of subjects with Myocilin Arg272Gly (NCT00906087)
Timeframe: 10 week study

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cosopt1

[back to top]

Baseline IOP

IOP was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. The primary evaluation was based on the study eye (the worse eye based on the 0800 hour IOP baseline or the right eye when both eyes had the same IOP). (NCT01026831)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Baseline 0800 timepoint (n=299; n=313)Baseline 1000 timepoint (n=299; n=313)Baseline 1600 timepoint (n=296; n=312)
Tafluprost26.124.823.8
Timolol Maleate26.024.623.5

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change From Baseline at All 9 Time Points During the Study (0800, 1000 and 1600 Hrs at Weeks 2, 6, and 12)

"IOP was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. The primary evaluation was based on the study eye (the worse eye based on the 0800 hour IOP baseline or the right eye when both eyes had the same IOP).~IOP change from baseline was calculated using the baseline IOP at each time point (0800 hours at baseline to 0800 hours at Week 2, 6, and 12; 1000 hours at baseline to 1000 hours at Week 2, 6, and 12; 1600 hours at baseline to 1600 hours at Week 2, 6, and 12).~Lowering elevated IOP is a treatment goal of glaucoma." (NCT01026831)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, and 12.

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Week 2 - 0800 (n=280; n=295)Week 2 - 1000 (n=293; n=305)Week 2 - 1600 (n=289; n=302)Week 6 - 0800 (n=294; n=308)Week 6 - 1000 (n=298; n=312)Week 6 - 1600 (n=295; n=310)Week 12 - 0800 (n=296; n=308)Week 12 - 1000 (n=298; n=312)Week 12 - 1600 (n=295; n=310)
Tafluprost-7.1-6.8-6.2-7.3-7.0-6.3-7.4-7.0-6.2
Timolol Maleate-6.8-6.1-5.3-7.4-6.6-5.5-7.5-6.6-5.7

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events

the numbers of adverse events were quantified by group of studies, the presence of each event was taken as a event. (NCT01062971)
Timeframe: basal (day 1 ) and security call (day 75)

Interventionevents (Number)
A (Triple Therapy)2
B (Doble Therapy)6

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

the intraocular pressure was measured by the Goldman tonometer and reported in millimeters of mercury. (NCT01062971)
Timeframe: basal (day 1 ) and final (day 60)

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
baselineFinal
A (Triple Therapy)24.113.9
B (Doble Therapy)23.616.9

[back to top]

The Difference of Change From Baseline of Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Between the Two Treatment Groups at Week 4

The difference of change from baseline of mean diurnal IOP between the 0.03% Bimatoprost/0.5% Timolol in Same Bottle and the 0.03% Bimatoprost and 0.5% Timolol in Separate Bottles at week 4. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Mean diurnal IOP is the average of the IOP values of the study eye (the eye with the highest IOP at baseline) over the 3 time points measured at 8AM, 12PM and 4PM. A negative number change from baseline indicated a reduction (improvement) in IOP. The difference of change from baseline in IOP is presented in the statistical analysis section. (NCT01068964)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 4
0.03% Bimatoprost and 0.5% Timolol in Separate Bottles24.87-8.93
0.03% Bimatoprost/0.5% Timolol in Same Bottle25.20-9.38

[back to top]

3-year Change in OPP

Measurement of change in ocular perfusion pressure (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 month visits

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Trusopt-4.91
Prostaglandin Alone-1.43

[back to top]

6-month Change inOphthalmic Artery (OA) End Diastolic Velocity (EDV)

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - ophthalmic artery end diastolic velocity (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 month visits

Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Trusopt.78
Prostaglandin Alone-.03

[back to top]

6-month Change in Ophthalmic Artery (OA) Vascular Resistance (RI)

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - ophthalmic artery resistance index, this is a measure of the amount of resistance to blood flow within the selected blood vessel. (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 month visits

Interventionunitless (Mean)
Trusopt-.011
Prostaglandin Alone.002

[back to top]

6-month Change in Ophthalmic Artery (OA) Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV)

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - ophthalmic artery peak systolic velocity (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 month visits

Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Trusopt2.32
Prostaglandin Alone-.30

[back to top]

6-month Change in Ocular Perfusion Pressures (OPP)

Measurement of change in ocular perfusion pressure, the pressure of blood flow to the eye minus the pressure of within the eye. (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 month visits

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Trusopt-.30
Prostaglandin Alone-2.88

[back to top]

6-month Change in Central Retinal Artery (CRA) Vascular Resistance (RI)

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - central retinal arteries resistance index, this is a measure of the amount of resistance to blood flow within the selected blood vessel. (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 month visits

Interventionunitless (Mean)
Trusopt-.012
Prostaglandin Alone.005

[back to top]

6-month Change in Central Retinal Artery (CRA) Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV)

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - central retinal arteries peak systolic velocity (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 month visits

Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Trusopt0.24
Prostaglandin Alone-.045

[back to top]

3-year Change in CRA EDV

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - central retinal arteries end diastolic velocity (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 month visits

Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Trusopt-.21
Prostaglandin Alone.12

[back to top]

3-year Change in CRA PSV

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - central retinal arteries peak systolic velocity (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 month visits

Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Trusopt-.66
Prostaglandin Alone.37

[back to top]

3-year Change in CRA RI

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - central retinal arteries resistance index (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 month visits

Interventionunitless (Mean)
Trusopt.007
Prostaglandin Alone.013

[back to top]

3-year Change in OA EDV

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - ophthalmic artery end diastolic velocity (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 month visits

Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Trusopt-.58
Prostaglandin Alone-.98

[back to top]

3-year Change in OA PSV

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - ophthalmic artery peak systolic velocity (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 month visits

Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Trusopt-.62
Prostaglandin Alone.07

[back to top]

3-year Change in OA RI

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - ophthalmic artery resistance index (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 month visits

Interventionunitless (Mean)
Trusopt.042
Prostaglandin Alone.036

[back to top]

6-month Change in Central Retinal Artery (CRA) End Diastolic Velocity (EDV)

Measurement of change in ocular blood flow - central retinal arteries end diastolic velocity (NCT01145898)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 month visits

Interventioncm/sec (Mean)
Trusopt.18
Prostaglandin Alone-.12

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects in Treatment Group Compared to Placebo Group With at Least 75% Improvement in the Extent of the Hemangioma as Compared to Baseline Photos.

This will be generated by asking each of the assessors to score the improvement using a visual analog scale (VAS) assessing the decrease in size of hemangioma by comparing photographs at different times of treatment. The assessors will score this improvement into one of the following categories: 0-24%, 25-49%, 50-74%, >75%. (NCT01147601)
Timeframe: at 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Topical 0.5% Timolol1
Placebo0

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12

Mean Diurnal (average of 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM time points) IOP at Week 12 in the study eye. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. (NCT01170884)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Combigan® + Lumigan®15.4
Lumigan®19.2

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP), Period 2

IOP (mean IOP) after treaemt from week 8 to week 12 (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
IOP at 8amIOP at 10amIOP at 12pmIOP at 16pmIOP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 212.3612.3612.7213.0413.13
Latanoprost, Period 213.1312.8112.5412.8113.40

[back to top]

OPP, Period 2

"OPP was calculated according to the following formula:~OPP=(1/3 systolic BP + 2/3 diastolic BP) x 2/3 -IOP, diastolic OPP (DOPP)=diastolic BP-IOP~OPP after treaemt from week 8 to week 12" (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPP at 8amOPP at 10amOPP at 12pmOPP at 16pmOPP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 246.7146.0745.9044.9946.70
Latanoprost, Period 248.3648.0448.4747.8147.10

[back to top]

Ocular Perfusion Pressure (OPP), Period 1

"OPP was calculated according to the following formula:~OPP=(1/3 systolic BP + 2/3 diastolic BP) x 2/3 -IOP, diastolic OPP (DOPP)=diastolic BP-IOP" (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
OPP at 8amOPP at 10amOPP at 12pmOPP at 16pmOPP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 149.1246.9548.1745.4446.73
Latanoprost, Period 146.5746.6546.2146.8147.79

[back to top]

Blood Pressure (BP), Period 2

systolic and diastolic BP measured after treaemt from week 8 to week 12 (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
systolic BP at 8amsystolic BP at 10amsystolic BP at 12pmsystolic BP at 16pmsystolic BP at 20pmdiastolic BP at 8amdiastolic BP at 10amdiastolic BP at 12pmdiastolic BP at 16pmdiastolic BP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 2118.41117.95119.05118.45119.8273.7272.5072.4071.3674.72
Latanoprost, Period 2123.14123.59122.41124.50123.2376.4574.8675.5473.4573.81

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP), Period 1

IOP (mean IOP) after 4 weeks of treatment (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
IOP at 8amIOP at 10amIOP at 12pmIOP at 16pmIOP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 113.5013.3612.6313.7713.63
Latanoprost, Period 113.7213.2713.5413.7713.36

[back to top]

Blood Pressure (BP), Period 1

systolic and diastolic BP at 4 weeks after use of eyedrops (NCT01175902)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
systolic BP at 8amsystolic BP at 10amsystolic BP at 12pmsystolic BP at 16pmsystolic BP at 20pmdiastolic BP at 8amdiastolic BP at 10amdiastolic BP at 12pmdiastolic BP at 16pmdiastolic BP at 20pm
Dorzolamide/Timolol, Period 1122.82119.14120.55118.55119.4577.3673.8173.1872.8174.13
Latanoprost, Period 1121.82120.68120.45122.09123.3274.7774.5074.2275.2775.95

[back to top]

Average Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 12

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Average eye IOP is the average IOP of both eyes and was evaluated at Week 12 at Hour 0, Hour 2 and Hour 8. (NCT01177098)
Timeframe: Week 12

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Week 12_Hour 0Week 12_Hour 2Week 12_Hour 8
Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Ophthalmic Solution16.5616.3716.09
Bimatoprost/Timolol Formulation A16.2916.1815.85

[back to top]

Average Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 2

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Average eye IOP is the average IOP of both eyes and was evaluated at Week 2 at Hour 0, Hour 2 and Hour 8. (NCT01177098)
Timeframe: Week 2

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Week 2_Hour 0Week 2_Hour 2Week 2_Hour 8
Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Ophthalmic Solution16.4916.2315.83
Bimatoprost/Timolol Formulation A16.2316.0515.49

[back to top]

Average Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 6

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Average eye IOP is the average IOP of both eyes and was evaluated at Week 6 at Hour 0, Hour 2 and Hour 8. (NCT01177098)
Timeframe: Week 6

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Week 6_Hour 0Week 6_Hour 2Week 6_Hour 8
Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Ophthalmic Solution16.3116.1715.82
Bimatoprost/Timolol Formulation A16.2815.9015.71

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 12

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP was evaluated at Baseline and Week 12 at Hour 0, Hour 2 and Hour 8 in the worse eye, defined as the eye with the worse (higher) IOP at baseline. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT01177098)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline_Hour 0Baseline_Hour 2 (n=255,260)Baseline_Hour 8 (n=254,259)Change from baseline at Week 12_Hour 0 (n=244,237)Change from baseline at Week 12_Hour 2 (n=235,235)Change from baseline at Week 12_Hour 8 (n=237,234)
Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Ophthalmic Solution25.3824.7223.82-8.72-8.38-7.72
Bimatoprost/Timolol Formulation A25.4124.7923.88-9.06-8.53-7.98

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Eye IOP at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 12

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Average eye IOP was evaluated at Baseline and Week 12 at Hour 0, Hour 2 and Hour 8. Average eye IOP is defined as the average of the IOP in both eyes. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT01177098)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline_Hour 0Baseline_Hour 2Baseline_Hour 8Change from baseline at Week 12_Hour 0Change from baseline at Week 12_Hour 2Change from baseline at Week 12_Hour 8
Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Ophthalmic Solution24.8624.2323.36-8.30-7.86-7.27
Bimatoprost/Timolol Formulation A24.9424.2923.42-8.65-8.11-7.57

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Worse Eye IOP at Each Hour Evaluated at Week 12

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP was evaluated at Baseline and Week 12 at Hour 0, Hour 2 and Hour 8 in the worse eye, defined as the eye with the worse (higher) IOP at baseline. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT01177098)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline_Hour 0Baseline_Hour 2Baseline_Hour 8Change from baseline at Week 12_Hour 0Change from baseline at Week 12_Hour 2Change from baseline at Week 12_Hour 8
Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination Ophthalmic Solution25.3024.6123.80-8.51-8.08-7.52
Bimatoprost/Timolol Formulation A25.3424.7123.81-8.94-8.44-7.87

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Clinical Effectiveness Rate

Clinical effectiveness rate, which was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved clinical effectiveness over the total number of effectiveness analysis population, was presented along with the corresponding exact 2sided 95% confidence interval. Overall effectiveness of latanoprost/timolol was determined by the investigator based on clinical symptoms and examinations. Clinical effectiveness was assessed according to the following categories: (1) effective, (2) not effective, or (3) not assessable at the end of observation period (Max 104 weeks). (NCT01191008)
Timeframe: Max 104 weeks

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Latanoprost/Timolol Maleate82.8

[back to top]

Mean Concentration of AGN-207281 in Plasma at Day 7

Mean concentration of AGN-207281 in plasma at day 7. Plasma is the liquid component of the blood in which the blood cells are suspended. On day 7, the plasma sample collected 15 minutes post-morning dose from each patient receiving AGN-207281 was analyzed to determine the average drug concentration levels of AGN-207281. (NCT01215786)
Timeframe: Day 7

InterventionPicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Mean)
AGN-207281 Ophthalmic Solution177

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Day 14

Change from baseline in worse eye IOP at day 14. Worse eye IOP refers to the eye with the worse (highest) baseline IOP (a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye). A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT01215786)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14

,,
InterventionMillimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Baseline, Hour 0Baseline, Hour 2Baseline, Hour 8Change from Baseline at Day 14, Hour 0Change from Baseline at Day 14, Hour 2Change from Baseline at Day 14, Hour 8
AGN-207281 Ophthalmic Solution25.9825.9324.69-4.17-4.38-4.02
Placebo26.4526.3025.25-1.10-1.75-1.70
Timolol Ophthalmic Solution 0.5%26.5826.6124.82-6.16-6.08-4.00

[back to top]

Mean Concentration of AGN-207281 in Plasma at Day 14

Mean concentration of AGN-207281 in plasma at day 14. Plasma is the liquid component of the blood in which the blood cells are suspended. On day 14, the plasma sample collected 15 minutes post-morning dose from each patient receiving AGN-207281 was analyzed to determine the average drug concentration levels of AGN-207281. (NCT01215786)
Timeframe: Day 14

InterventionPicograms per milliliter (pg/mL) (Mean)
AGN-207281 Ophthalmic Solution540

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Mean diurnal IOP is the mean of the IOP values at hour 0, hour 2 and hour 8 at each visit in the study eye. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement), and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in IOP (worsening). (NCT01216943)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 12
Triple Combination Therapy22.35-3.98

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Analyzed by Two-Sample T-Test

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP is evaluated at Hour 0 and Hour 2 in the worse eye, defined as the eye with the worse (higher) Hour 0 IOP at baseline. The mean of Hours 0 and 2 is calculated at Baseline and Week 12 in the worse eye. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in IOP (worsening). Data are analyzed using a two-sample t-test. (NCT01217606)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 12 (N=85, 93)
Combigan®24.43-8.28
Triple Combination Therapy25.42-10.45

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Analyzed by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA)

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP is evaluated at Hour 0 and Hour 2 in the worse eye, defined as the eye with the worse (higher) IOP at baseline. The mean of Hours 0 and 2 is calculated at Baseline and Week 12 in the worse eye. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in IOP (worsening). Data are analyzed by ANCOVA. (NCT01217606)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 1 (N=82, 91)Change from Baseline at Week 2 (N=84, 92)Change from Baseline at Week 4 (N=85, 93)Change from Baseline at Week 8 (N=85, 93)Change from Baseline at Week 12 (N=85, 93)Change from Baseline at Month 6 (N=67, 73)Change from Baseline at Month 9 (N=67, 73)Change from Baseline at Month 12 (N=67, 73)
Combigan®24.43-8.13-8.28-8.53-8.07-8.28-8.42-8.17-7.77
Triple Combination Therapy25.42-11.63-11.20-10.85-10.44-10.45-10.32-10.09-9.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Analyzed by Mixed-Effect Model for Repeated Measure

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP is evaluated at Hour 0 and Hour 2 in the worse eye, defined as the eye with the worse (higher) Hour 0 IOP at baseline. The mean of Hours 0 and 2 is calculated at Baseline and Week 12 in the worse eye. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement) and a positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in IOP (worsening). Data are analyzed by a mixed-effect model for repeated measure. (NCT01217606)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Week 1 (N=82, 91)Change from Baseline at Week 2 (N=82, 87)Change from Baseline at Week 4 (N=82, 88)Change from Baseline at Week 8 (N=75, 87)Change from Baseline at Week 12 (N=76, 83)Change from Baseline at Month 6 (N=64, 69)Change from Baseline at Month 9 (N=58, 67)Change from Baseline at Month 12 (N=55, 63)
Combigan®24.43-8.13-8.12-8.35-7.94-8.16-8.29-8.14-7.58
Triple Combination Therapy25.42-11.63-11.24-10.88-10.53-10.56-10.41-10.29-9.38

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at Week 4

Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured in the study eye at baseline and Week 4. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT01229462)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
BaselineChange from baseline at Week 4
Alphagan® and Timolol Concurrent24.53-5.70
Combigan®25.07-6.21

[back to top]

Mean Worse Eye IOP

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each eye, the IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the median of the 3 measurements. The worse eye was determined based on the IOP results at Baseline. The mean worse eye IOP was the average of the IOP measurements of the worse eye at hours 0 and 2 at each time-point. (NCT01241240)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Week 1 (n=91,90)Week 2 (n=88,95)Week 4 (n=86,92)Week 8 (n=88,91)Week 12 (n=86,88)
Combigan®16.2316.0815.9616.1115.92
Triple Combination Therapy14.4314.0514.3814.6814.43

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each eye, the IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the median of the 3 measurements. The worse eye was determined based on the IOP results at Baseline. The mean worse eye IOP was the average of the IOP measurements of the worse eye at hours 0 and 2 at week 12. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01241240)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (n=93,95)Change from Baseline at Week 12 (n=93,94)
Combigan®25.12-9.18
Triple Combination Therapy24.62-10.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Worse Eye IOP

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each eye, the IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the median of the 3 measurements. The worse eye was determined based on the IOP results at Baseline. The mean worse eye IOP was the average of the IOP measurements of the worse eye at hours 0 and 2 at each visit. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01241240)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (n=93,95)Change from Baseline at Week 1 (n=91,89)Change from Baseline at Week 2 (n=88,93)Change from Baseline at Week 4 (n=86,90)Change from Baseline at Week 8 (n=88,89)
Combigan®25.12-8.90-9.06-9.21-9.02
Triple Combination Therapy24.62-10.18-10.40-10.06-9.77

[back to top]

Absolute Difference Between Patient's Lowest IOP Reading at Baseline (Day 0) and the Corresponding IOP Reading

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Two or three measurements of IOP are taken for each eye at each time point. The lowest IOP values between the two eyes for each patient at each time point are used to calculate the absolute difference. (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute Difference at Month 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution26.2-11.8
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution26.5-9.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Average Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each patient, the IOP is the average of the two eyes. The average IOP is the average of the 08:00, 12:00 and 16:00 hour time points at each visit for each patient. A negative number change from Baseline indicates a reduction in average IOP (improvement). (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline at Month 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution28.4-13.5
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution28.5-11.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline IOP

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each patient, the IOP is the average of the two eyes. IOP is recorded at the 08:00 (8:00 am), 12:00 (noon) and 16:00 (4:00 pm) hour time points for each patient at each visit. A negative number change from Baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Baseline-08:00Baseline-12:00Baseline-16:00Change from Baseline at Month 3-08:00Change from Baseline at Month 3-12:00Change from Baseline at Month 3-16:00
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution29.728.726.8-14.6-13.6-12.4
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution29.629.026.8-12.3-11.8-10.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Reaching a Predefined Target Pressure Threshold

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each patient, the IOP is the average of the two eyes. The predefined target pressure thresholds are at least a 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% reduction in IOP from baseline. (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionPercentage of Patients (Number)
Decrease of at Least 20%Decrease of at Least 30%Decrease of at Least 40%Decrease of at Least 50%
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution97.790.774.446.5
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution100.086.847.415.8

[back to top]

Absolute Difference Between Patient's Highest IOP Reading at Baseline (Day 0) and the Corresponding IOP Reading

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Two or three measurements of IOP are taken for each eye at each time point. The highest IOP values between the two eyes for each patient at each time point are used to calculate the absolute difference. (NCT01243567)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineAbsolute Difference at Month 3
Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Combination Ophthalmic Solution30.4-15.3
Latanoprost 0.005% Ophthalmic Solution30.3-12.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with study drug administration, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Participants with one or more AEs during the study are counted once in this summary. (NCT01254604)
Timeframe: Up to 14 days after Week 4 visit

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tafluprost28
Timolol32

[back to top]

Number of Participants With ≥25% Reduction in IOP From Baseline to Week 4 - Study Eye

"IOP was measured at baseline, Week 2 and Week 4 using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. At each of these visits, IOP measurement was performed at 0800, 1000 and 1600 hours. At each IOP assessment time point during a visit, 2 consecutive IOP measurements were made. If these 2 measurements differed by ≤2 mmHg, then the average of the 2 IOP values was recorded. If the 2 measurements differed by >2 mmHg, then a third measurement was obtained and the median of these 3 measurements was recorded. The IOP value for a visit (e.g., Week 4) was the mean of the values recorded at the 3 time points during the visit. For each participant, one study eye was identified for data summarization and analysis. The study eye was the eye with the higher (i.e., worse) IOP at baseline, or if both eyes had the same baseline IOP value, the right eye was designated the study eye. Percent reduction in IOP at Week 4 = ([baseline IOP value - Week 4 IOP value]/Baseline IOP value)*100." (NCT01254604)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tafluprost65
Timolol48

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE

An AE is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with study drug administration, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Participants who discontinued study drug treatment due to an AE are counted once in this summary. (NCT01254604)
Timeframe: Up to Week 4

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tafluprost3
Timolol2

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP Change From Baseline at Week 4 - Study Eye

"IOP was measured at baseline, Week 2 and Week 4 using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. At each of these visits, IOP measurement was performed at 0800, 1000 and 1600 hours. At each IOP assessment time point during a visit, 2 consecutive IOP measurements were made. If these 2 measurements differed by ≤2 mmHg, then the average of the 2 IOP values was recorded. If the 2 measurements differed by >2 mmHg, then a third measurement was obtained and the median of these 3 measurements was recorded. The IOP value for a visit (e.g., Week 4) was the mean of the values recorded at the 3 time points during the visit. For each participant, one study eye was identified for data summarization and analysis for this primary efficacy outcome measure. The study eye was the eye with the higher (i.e., worse) IOP at baseline, or if both eyes had the same baseline IOP value, the right eye was designated the study eye. Change from baseline in IOP at Week 4 = Week 4 IOP value - baseline IOP value." (NCT01254604)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Tafluprost-8.3
Timolol-6.6

[back to top]

Duration of Intraocular Gas

Patients will self-monitor gas bubble duration and will receive weekly phone calls by the study coordinator until gas disappearance is confirmed. (NCT01257698)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks

Interventiondays (Mean)
Dorzolamide-timolol Topical Drops17.1
Standard of Care18.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP Per Prostaglandin Group at Week 12

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. Only prostaglandin subgroups with ≥ 15 patients were analyzed. Only one eye (study eye) contributed to the mean. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
AZARGA + Latanoprost (n=22)AZARGA + Travoprost (n=15)
Azarga-7.1-5.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Reaching the Target IOP (≤ 18 mmHg)

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye (study eye) was assessed. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Azarga70.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. Only one eye (study eye) contributed to the mean. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Azarga-6.0

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. Only one eye (study eye) contributed to the mean. (NCT01263444)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Azarga-6.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP of ≤ 18 mmHg in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

IOP (fluid pressure in the eye) was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry. An increase in intraocular pressure may be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Week 4Week 12
DUOTRAV®78.685.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 4 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

IOP (fluid pressure in the eye) was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry. A positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in intraocular pressure, which may be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 4

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)Change from Baseline at Week 4
DUOTRAV®20.1-3.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Hyperemia Score at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

Ocular hyperemia (visible eye redness) was assessed during slit lamp examination and graded on a 5-point scale (0=none, 4=severe). A positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in ocular redness. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
DUOTRAV®-0.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

The OSDI is a 12-item quality of life questionnaire designed to assess ocular surface symptoms, their severity, and their impact on the subject's ability to function. Each item was scored by the subject on a 0-4 Likert-type scale (0=None, 4=All of the Time), with a resultant overall score of 0-100 (0=no disability, 100=complete disability). A negative number change from baseline represents a perceived improvement in ocular health. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)Change from Baseline at Week 12
DUOTRAV®14.9-3.6

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12 in Subjects Using Ganfort® at Baseline

IOP (fluid pressure in the eye) was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry. A positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in intraocular pressure, which may be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01327599)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Baseline (Day 1)Change from baseline at Week 12
DUOTRAV®20.0-3.8

[back to top]

Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Change at the Final Visit From Baseline (Prior Beta-blocker Monotherapy)

As measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. High IOP (outside the normal range) can be a risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. (NCT01336569)
Timeframe: Baseline, up to 6 weeks

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
DuoTrav-5.0

[back to top]

Preferred Treatment

"The participant completed a questionnaire on the Day 15 visit (ie, after administration of both study medications) consisting of a single preference question: Thinking about the comfort of the two medications (1st and 2nd) that you took during this study, which medication do you prefer? Preferred treatment is presented as a percentage." (NCT01340014)
Timeframe: At the end of both periods, Day 15

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AZARGA60.2
COSOPT39.8

[back to top]

Ocular Discomfort

Ocular discomfort was assessed by the participant 1 minute after instillation of the study medication. Ocular discomfort was rated on a 10-point scale (0=no discomfort, 9=substantial discomfort). (NCT01340014)
Timeframe: Day 7 of each period

InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
AZARGA2.6
COSOPT3.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal IOP(Intraocular Pressure) at End of Study

Mean diurnal IOP(intraocular pressure) was calculated as an average of IOP(intraocular pressure) at 9:30 (pre-dose), 11:30 and 17:30. (NCT01342081)
Timeframe: Week 0(Baseline) and Week 4(End of Study)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
DE-111-2.6
Tafluprost-0.9
Tafluprost Plus Timolol-2.2

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean Diurnal IOP (Intraocular Pressure) at End of Study

Mean diurnal IOP (intraocular pressure) was calculated as an average of IOP (intraocular pressure) at 9:30 (pre-dose), 11:30 and 17:30. (NCT01342094)
Timeframe: Week 0(Baseline) and Week 4(End of Study)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
DE-111-3.2
Timolol-1.7

[back to top]

Mean IOP Change From Baseline at 11 AM

Mean IOP change from baseline at 11 AM was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. One eye from each subject was chosen as the study eye, and only data for the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. A higher IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater improvement. (NCT01357616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Up to Week 8

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline at Week 2Change from baseline at Week 4Change from baseline at Week 8
AZARGA-7.5-7.6-7.4
AZOPT + Timolol-6.8-6.8-6.5

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP Change From Baseline at Week 8

Mean diurnal IOP change from baseline at Week 8 (ie, the subject IOP change from baseline averaged over the 9 AM, 11AM and 5 PM time points at Week 8) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. One eye from each subject was chosen as the study eye, and only data for the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. A higher IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater improvement.. (NCT01357616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
AZARGA-6.84
AZOPT + Timolol-6.00

[back to top]

Mean IOP Change From Baseline at 9 AM

Mean IOP change from baseline at 9 AM was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. One eye from each subject was chosen as the study eye, and only data for the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. A higher IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater improvement. (NCT01357616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Up to Week 8

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Change from baseline at Week 2Change from baseline at Week 4Change from baseline at Week 8
AZARGA-6.9-7.3-6.7
AZOPT + Timolol-6.5-6.4-6.2

[back to top]

Mean IOP Change From Baseline (5 PM) at Week 8

Mean IOP change from baseline (5 PM) at Week 8 was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. One eye from each subject was chosen as the study eye, and only data for the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. A higher IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater improvement. (NCT01357616)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
AZARGA-6.3
AZOPT + Timolol-5.1

[back to top]

Change in IOP at the Final Visit From Prior Brimonidine 0.2%/Timolol 0.5% Fixed Combination (COMBIGAN®) Therapy (i.e. From Baseline)

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed by Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. (NCT01415401)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineChange from baseline at Week 8
AZARGA22.24-2.24

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP (≤ 18 mmHg)

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed by Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in mmHg. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. (NCT01415401)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AZARGA36.2

[back to top]

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at the Final Visit From Prior Beta-blocker Monotherapy (Timolol 0.5% Only)

As measured at baseline and final visit with Goldmann applanation tonometry. The outcome measure was pre-specified for Timolol 0.5% only participants. (NCT01484951)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
BaselineChange at Week 8
AZARGA18.22-3.56

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Target IOP (≤18 mmHg), Regardless of Prior Therapy

As measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry. The outcome measure was pre-specified for all participants. (NCT01484951)
Timeframe: Week 8

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
AZARGA54.3

[back to top]

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8 Weeks From Baseline (Prior Therapy).

Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. Data for the worse eye were used for the efficacy analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT01514734)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionmillimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
AZARGA-0.89

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Who Reach Target IOP (≤18 mmHg) at Week 8

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. (NCT01518244)
Timeframe: Week 8

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AZARGA®55.3

[back to top]

Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline (Prior Therapy) at Week 8

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. A higher IOP can be a greater risk for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. (NCT01518244)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Interventionmilllimeters mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
AZARGA®-3.60

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 12

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) was measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM at Week 12. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline_8 AMChange from Baseline at Week 12 _8 AM (n=61,63)Baseline_12 NoonChange from Baseline at Week 12_12 Noon (n=61,63)Baseline_4 PMChange from Baseline at Week 12_4 PM (n=61,63)
DuoTrav®22.0-4.520.3-2.319.8-2.4
LUMIGAN® RC22.0-2.720.6-1.919.8-1.3

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. The mean diurnal IOP was the average of the IOP values of the study eye (worse eye) at Week 12 measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM. For each study eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
LUMIGAN® RC18.6
DuoTrav®17.4

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Mean IOP at Week 6

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) was measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM at Week 6. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline_ 8 AMChange from Baseline at Week 6 _8 AM (n=66,64)Baseline_12 NoonChange from Baseline at Week 6_12 Noon (n=66,64)Baseline_4 PMChange from Baseline at Week 6_4 PM (n=66,64)
DuoTrav®22.0-4.820.3-2.819.8-2.9
LUMIGAN® RC22.0-2.820.6-2.119.8-1.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥15% Reduction in Mean Diurnal IOP From Baseline

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure in the eye. The mean diurnal IOP was the average of the IOP values of the study eye (worse eye) measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
LUMIGAN® RC26.2
DuoTrav®47.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 18 mmHg

IOP is a measure of the fluid pressure in the eye. The mean diurnal IOP was the average of the IOP values of the study eye (worse eye) at Week 12 measured at 8 AM, 12 Noon and 4 PM. For each eye, IOP was either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT01547598)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
LUMIGAN® RC11.5
DuoTrav®17.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. (NCT01628601)
Timeframe: Baseline, 18 Weeks

InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Median)
Baseline - Right Eye (N=345)Change from Baseline at 18 Wks-Rt Eye (N=345)Baseline - Left Eye (N=344)Change from Baseline at 18 Wks-Lft Eye (N=344)
POAG or OHT22.0-6.022.0-6.0

[back to top]

Physician Assessment of Tolerability Using a 4-Point Scale

Physician assessment of tolerability using a 4-point scale (very good, good, moderate, and poor). The number of patients assessed as good and very good combined are reported. (NCT01628601)
Timeframe: 18 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
POAG or OHT340

[back to top]

Physician Assessment of Adherence to GANfort®

"Physician Assessment of Adherence to GANfort® was assessed on a 3-point scale (better, equal, and worse). The number of patients assessed as better compliance are reported." (NCT01628601)
Timeframe: 18 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
POAG or OHT112

[back to top]

Patients Continuing With GANfort® After 18 Weeks

Patients continuing with GANfort® after 18 weeks was assessed as Yes or No. (NCT01628601)
Timeframe: 18 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
POAG or OHT329

[back to top]

Patient Assessment of Tolerability Using a 4-Point Scale

Patient assessment of tolerability using a 4-point scale (very good, good, moderate, and poor). The number of patients assessed as good and very good combined are reported. (NCT01628601)
Timeframe: 18 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
POAG or OHT319

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 3

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using a calibrated tonometer and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye from each participant was chosen as the study eye and only the study eye was used for analysis. (NCT01652664)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost-5.4
Timolol-5.3

[back to top]

Variation in Episcleral Venous Pressure.

Episcleral venous pressure (mm Hg) of the eye will be determined under baseline condition and under glaucoma drug treatment. (NCT01677507)
Timeframe: 1 week treatment

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Right eyeLeft eye
Latanoprost7.77.4
Timolol7.67.3

[back to top]

Variation in Aqueous Flow Between Individuals.

Aqueous flow production (microliters/minute) will be determined under baseline condition and under glaucoma drug treatment. (NCT01677507)
Timeframe: 1 week after treatment

,
Interventionmicroliters/min (Mean)
Right eyeLeft eye
Latanoprost2.83.0
Timolol1.92.0

[back to top]

Variation in Eye Pressure Between Individuals.

Eye pressure is a steady state quantitative trait that is measured in mm Hg. Eye pressure is determined by the following physiological factors (units of measure): eye fluid or aqueous humor production (microliters/minute), aqueous humor outflow (microliters/minute), outflow resistance (microliters/minute/mm Hg) and venous pressure (mm Hg) of the eye. All of these physiological factors will be determined under baseline condition and under glaucoma drug treatment. (NCT01677507)
Timeframe: Measurement after 1 week of drug treatment

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
RIght EyesLeft Eyes
Latanoprost11.311.0
Timolol11.511.0

[back to top]

24 Hour IOP

Supine intraocular pressure (IOP) measured in the study eye following 4 weeks of treatment (NCT01707381)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of treatment

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol Maleate23.55
BOL-303259-X21.77

[back to top]

IOP Area Under the Curve Over 24 Hours

The Area Under the Curve(AUC) is the weighted average of IOP over all 24-hour IOP assessment times (2pm, 4pm, 6pm, 8pm, 10pm, 12am, 2am, 4am, 6am, 8am, 10am, 12pm). The AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. (NCT01707381)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of treatment

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol Maleate23.54
BOL-303259-X21.77

[back to top]

24-hour Ocular Perfusion Pressure

Sitting Ocular Perfusion Pressure = 95/140 x mean arterial blood pressure - IOP; Supine Ocular Perfusion Pressure = 115/130 x mean arterial blood pressure - IOP; the nocturnal time frame encompassed measures taken at 10pm, 12am, 2am and 4 am; whereas the diurnal time frame encompassed measures taken at 6am, 8am, 10am, 12pm, 2pm, 4pm, 6pm, and 8pm. (NCT01707381)
Timeframe: after 4 weeks of treatment

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
OPP (nocturnal)OPP (Diurnal supine)OPP (Diurnal sitting)
BOL-303259-X52.555.945.2
Timolol Maleate48.454.843.2

[back to top]

Response Rate - IOP Reduction ≥ 25%

Percentage of participants with IOP reduction ≥ 25% consistently at all 9 time points in the first 3 months (NCT01749904)
Timeframe: 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM at Visit 4(Week 2), Visit 5 (Week 6), and Visit 6 (Month 3).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BOL-303259-X99
Timolol26

[back to top]

Response Rate - IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg

Percentage of participants with IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg consistently at all 9 time points in the first 3 months (NCT01749904)
Timeframe: 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM at Visit 4(Week 2), Visit 5 (Week 6), and Visit 6 (Month 3).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BOL-303259-X65
Timolol15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events

Following assessments through Visit 6 (Month 3), all participants, irrespective of previous randomization, converted to a single open label safety arm receiving BOL-303259-X QD in the evening. Adverse events were recorded throughout the comparative efficacy phase and open label extension phase. (NCT01749904)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>/= 1 nonocular AE>/= 1 ocular (Study eye) AE
BOL-303259-X3638
BOL-303259-X Safety Extension Phase6246
Timolol1916

[back to top]

Mean IOP

Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) in study eye measured at the specified time points: 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM at Visit 4(Week 2), Visit 5 (Week 6), and Visit 6 (Month 3). (NCT01749904)
Timeframe: 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM at Visit 4(Week 2), Visit 5 (Week 6), and Visit 6 (Month 3)

,
Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
8 am week 212 pm week 24 pm week 28 am week 612 pm week 64 pm week 68 am Month 312 pm Month 34 pm Month 3
BOL-303259-X18.6118.0018.0918.5917.8417.8218.7117.8817.83
Timolol19.8419.3719.2019.6319.0919.0919.7319.1519.15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Ocular and Systemic Adverse Events

Following assessments through 3 months (Visit 6), all participants, irrespective of previous randomization, converted to a single open label safety arm receiving BOL-303259-X QD in the evening for an additional 3 months through Visit 7. Adverse events were recorded throughout the comparative efficacy phase and open label extension phase. (NCT01749930)
Timeframe: 6 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
>/= 1 nonocular AE>/= 1 ocular (Study eye) AE
BOL-303259-X3666
BOL-303259-X Safety Extension Phase2353
Timolol1818

[back to top]

IOP Reduction ≥ 25%

Percentage of participants with IOP reduction ≥ 25% consistently at all 9 time points in the first 3 months (NCT01749930)
Timeframe: 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM at Visit 4 (Week 2), Visit 5 (Week 6), and Visit 6 (Month 3)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BOL-303259-X86
Timolol25

[back to top]

IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg

Percentage of participants with IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg consistently at all 9 time points in the first 3 months (NCT01749930)
Timeframe: 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM at Visit 4 (Week 2), Visit 5 (Week 6), and Visit 6 (Month 3)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BOL-303259-X49
Timolol15

[back to top]

Mean IOP

Mean intraocular pressure (IOP) in the study eye measured at the specified time points: 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM at Visit 4 (Week 2), Visit 5 (Week 6), and Visit 6 (Month 3). (NCT01749930)
Timeframe: 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM at Visit 4 (Week 2), Visit 5 (Week 6), and Visit 6 (Month 3)

,
Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
8 am week 212 pm week 24 pm week 28 am week 612 pm week 64 pm week 68 am Month 312 pm Month 34 pm Month 3
BOL-303259-X19.1718.4618.1018.6718.0217.8718.6817.9217.72
Timolol19.6119.2218.7919.5918.8618.8519.5619.2119.06

[back to top]

Change in Lesion Area of Treated Telangiectasia.

Change in lesion area (compared with baseline measurement) of treated telangiectasia. (NCT01752049)
Timeframe: 84 days

Interventionmm^2 (Geometric Mean)
Topical Timolol Maleate-6
Placebo-8

[back to top]

Complete Resolution of Intraocular Gas Bubble

This will be reported by the patient when they see/feel the gas bubble disappear. (NCT01843920)
Timeframe: Following surgery, until gas bubble is gone. Up to 2 months.

InterventionDuration in days, gas bubble (Mean)
Post Surgery Without Glaucoma Drops40.4
Post Surgery With Glaucoma Drops37.8

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) is measured at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM. IOP is either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement is required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT01881126)
Timeframe: Week 12 at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Week 12 at 8 AMWeek 12 at 12 PMWeek 12 at 4 PM
Bimatoprost 0.01% and Hypromellose 0.3%16.416.016.5
Travatan 0.004% and Timolol 0.5%15.115.014.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 12

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 12. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01915940)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline (T=0 hour)Baseline (T=2 hour)Baseline (T=8 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 12 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 12 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 12 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert24.9923.6522.95-5.26-4.26-3.99
Timolol 0.5% + Placebo Ocular Insert25.3423.7523.16-6.31-5.60-5.19

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 2

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (time (T)=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 2. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01915940)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 2

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline (T=0 hour)Baseline (T=2 hour)Baseline (T=8 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 2 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 2 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 2 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert24.9923.6522.95-6.40-5.20-4.21
Timolol 0.5% + Placebo Ocular Insert25.3423.7523.16-6.30-5.59-4.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 6

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Month 6. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01915940)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Month 6

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline (T=0 hour)Baseline (T=2 hour)Baseline (T=8 hour)Change from Baseline to Month 6 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Month 6 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Month 6 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert24.9923.6522.95-4.58-3.87-3.25
Timolol 0.5% + Placebo Ocular Insert25.3423.7523.16-5.97-5.20-4.24

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 5

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Month 5. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01915940)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Month 5

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline (T=0 hour)Baseline (T= 2 hour)Baseline (T=8 hour)Change from Baseline to Month 5 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Month 5 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Month 5 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert24.9923.6522.95-4.28-3.87-3.21
Timolol 0.5% + Placebo Ocular Insert25.3423.7523.16-6.35-5.45-4.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP at Month 4

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Month 4. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01915940)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 4

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline (T=0 hour)Baseline (T=2 hour)Baseline (T=8 hour)Change from Baseline to Month 4 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Month 4 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Month 4 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert24.9923.6522.95-5.14-4.37-3.84
Timolol 0.5% + Placebo Ocular Insert25.3423.7523.16-6.29-5.26-5.11

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 6. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. (NCT01915940)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6

,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Baseline (T=0 hour)Baseline (T=2 hour)Baseline (T=8 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 6 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 6 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 6 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert24.9923.6522.95-5.47-4.70-3.78
Timolol 0.5% + Placebo Ocular Insert25.3423.7523.16-6.41-5.40-4.42

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement. The median total treatment duration for participants was 63.0 days. (NCT01976624)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Right Eye: Baseline (n=608)Right Eye: Change from Baseline (n=608)Left Eye: Baseline (n=616)Left Eye: Change from Baseline (n=616)
Ganfort®18.23-3.2818.23-3.50

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Adverse Drug Reactions

An Adverse Event was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An Adverse Drug Reaction was a harmful and unintended reaction that is incurred during routine administration or use of the drug, whose causal relationship with the drug cannot be excluded. (NCT01976624)
Timeframe: Up to 51 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Adverse EventsAdverse Drug Reactions
Ganfort®146134

[back to top]

Mean 24-hour IOP at Week 4

24-hour IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) is the mean of all the time points assessed (8 AM to 6 AM). IOP was measured with a calibrated applanation tonometer in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). One eye from each subject was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT01978600)
Timeframe: Week 4: 8AM, 10AM, 12PM, 2PM, 4PM, 6PM, 8PM, 10PM, 12AM, 2AM, 4AM, 6AM

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day 0)Week 4
Simbrinza23.617.9
Timolol22.818.2

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 4

Diurnal IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) is the mean of the diurnal time points assessed (8 AM to 8 PM). IOP was measured with a calibrated applanation tonometer in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). One eye from each subject was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT01978600)
Timeframe: Week 4: 8AM, 10AM, 12PM, 2PM, 4PM, 6PM, 8PM

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day 0)Week 4
Simbrinza23.217.3
Timolol22.217.7

[back to top]

Mean Nocturnal IOP at Week 4

Nocturnal IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) is the mean of the nocturnal time points assessed (10 PM to 6 AM). IOP was measured with a calibrated applanation tonometer in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). One eye from each subject was chosen as the study eye and only data for the study eye were used for the efficacy analysis. A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). (NCT01978600)
Timeframe: Week 4: 10PM, 12AM, 2AM, 4AM, 6AM

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline (Day 0)Week 4
Simbrinza24.218.6
Timolol23.618.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events

An adverse event was any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. (NCT01987752)
Timeframe: Up to 2.6 Years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combigan® Ophthalmic Solution6.56

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Improvement From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. The study doctor classified the overall improvement of the IOP change from Baseline into 3 categories: Improvement (effective), No Change or Exacerbation (ineffective). The percentage of participants with Improvement is reported. (NCT01987752)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Combigan® Ophthalmic Solution85.69

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Discontinued Treatment

The percentage of participants who discontinued treatment with Ganfort® UD up to the Week 12 Final Visit (NCT01999348)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Patients With POAG or OHT6.47

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye

IOP is a measure of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. A result at the Final Visit that is lower than the result at Baseline indicates a reduction in IOP (improvement). (NCT01999348)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit (Week 8 to 12)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
BaselineFinal Visit
Patients With POAG or OHT22.1816.11

[back to top]

Physician Assessment of IOP-Lowering Effect in the Study Eye Using a 3-Point Scale

The physician assessed the effectiveness of Ganfort® UD with regard to IOP changes from Baseline using a 3-point scale where: 1=Better than expected (best), 2=As expected and 3=Worse than expected. The number of participants in each category is reported. (NCT01999348)
Timeframe: Baseline, Final Visit (Week 8 to 12)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Better than expectedAs expectedWorse than expectedMissing data
Patients With POAG or OHT4977299867

[back to top] [back to top]

Physician Assessment of Tolerability on a 4-Point Scale

The physician assessed the patient's tolerability of Ganfort® UD using a 4-point scale where: 1=very good (best), 2=good, 3=moderate and 4=poor. The number of participants in each category is reported. (NCT01999348)
Timeframe: Final Visit (Week 8 to 12)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very goodGoodModeratePoorMissing
Patients With POAG or OHT809474402840

[back to top]

Patient Assessment of Tolerability on a 4-Point Scale

The patient assessed the tolerability of Ganfort® UD using a 4-point scale where: 1=very good (best), 2=good, 3=moderate and 4=poor. The number of participants in each category is reported. (NCT01999348)
Timeframe: Final Visit (Week 8 to 12)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Very goodGoodModeratePoorMissing
Patients With POAG or OHT788461455047

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Prescribed by the Physician to Continue Treatment

The percentage of participants who continued treatment with Ganfort® UD after Week 12. (NCT01999348)
Timeframe: Final Visit (Week 8 to 12)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Patients With POAG or OHT89.14

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP (8AM) at Week 4 in the Study Eye

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and is measured in mmHg. A more negative percent change from baseline indicates a greater amount of improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02003391)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
DuoTrav-25.365
Beta-blocker-4.716

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (8AM) at Week 4 in the Study Eye

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and is measured in mmHg. A negative change indicates an improvement. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02003391)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
DuoTrav-5.840
Beta-blocker-1.069

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 8AM in the Study Eye

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and is measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. (NCT02003391)
Timeframe: Week 4

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
DuoTrav16.6129
Beta-blocker21.2320

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP of the study eye (worse eye) is measured at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM. IOP is either the average of 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement is required, the average of 3 measurements. (NCT02097719)
Timeframe: Week 12 at 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM

,
InterventionMillimeters of Mercury (mmHg) (Mean)
Week 12 at 8 AM (N=46, 50)Week 12 at 12 PM (N=46, 50)Week 12 at 4 PM (N=47, 50)
Bimatoprost 0.01% and Hypromellose 0.3%16.716.216.0
Travoprost 0.004% and Timolol 0.5%15.415.615.4

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

The primary efficacy outcome is mean IOP (NCT02207491)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1, 0800 hoursDay 1, 1000 hoursDay 1, 1600 hoursDay 15, 0800 hoursDay 15, 1000 hoursDay 15, 1600 hoursDay 43, 0800 hoursDay 43, 1000 hoursDay 43, 1600 hoursDay 90 (month 3), 0800 hoursDay 90 (month 3), 1000 hoursDay 90 (month 3), 1600 hours
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% & Placebo23.4222.2821.7818.6817.2917.2419.3518.1417.8619.8118.9218.48
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID23.3721.9221.4518.3317.5517.7018.2417.4417.7118.4717.9617.74

[back to top]

Extent of Exposure

Exposure to study medication in days for all treatment groups. (NCT02207491)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% & Placebo82.8
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID87.4

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

The primary efficacy outcome is mean intraocular pressure (IOP) (NCT02207621)
Timeframe: 3 months

,,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1, 0800 hoursDay 1, 1000 hoursDay 1, 1600 hoursDay 15, 0800 hoursDay 15, 1000 hoursDay 15, 1600 hoursDay 43, 0800 hoursDay 43, 1000 hoursDay 43, 1600 hoursDay 90 (Month 3), 0800 hoursDay 90 (Month 3), 1000 hoursDay 90 (Month 3), 1600 hours
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% & Placebo23.5122.3121.5619.0117.7417.3719.3718.1017.8819.4318.1817.73
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% BID23.5022.2621.4918.2016.9116.2818.5717.0916.5818.6617.8117.08
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID23.4522.1821.6118.2517.4917.5918.0817.3117.2518.2117.5217.67

[back to top]

Extent of Exposure

Exposure to study medication in days for all treatment groups (NCT02207621)
Timeframe: 12 Months

Interventiondays (Mean)
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% & Placebo259.7
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID324.5
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% BID185.2

[back to top]

Extent of Exposure

Exposure to study medication in days for all treatment groups (NCT02246764)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% & Placebo224.4
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% BID101.8
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID314.6

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hour 2)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02247804)
Timeframe: Week 12 (Hour 2)

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg16.81
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg17.30
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.51

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hours 0 and 2)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. A mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analyses. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02247804)
Timeframe: Baseline (Hours 0 and 2) to Week 12 (Hours 0 and 2)

,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline at Hour 0, Week 12Change from Baseline at Hour 2, Week 12
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg-6.38-6.69
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg-6.46-7.18
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator-6.05-6.48

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hour 0)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02247804)
Timeframe: Week 12 (Hour 0)

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg17.53
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg17.61
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.94

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 2 (Hour 2)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02247804)
Timeframe: Week 2 (Hour 2)

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg16.48
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg16.42
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.33

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 2 (Hour 0)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02247804)
Timeframe: Week 2 (Hour 0)

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg16.82
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg17.02
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.83

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 6 (Hour 0)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02247804)
Timeframe: Week 6 (Hour 0)

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg17.08
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg16.88
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.71

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 6 (Hour 2)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02247804)
Timeframe: Week 6 (Hour 2)

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg16.62
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg16.51
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.16

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02247804)
Timeframe: Baseline (Hours 0 and 2) to Weeks 2 and 6 (Hours 0 and 2)

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline at Hour 0, Week 2Change from Baseline at Hour 2, Week 2Change from Baseline at Hour 0, Week 6Change from Baseline at Hour 2, Week 6
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg-6.97-7.57-7.11-7.48
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg-7.17-7.52-6.91-7.37
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator-6.17-6.67-6.29-6.83

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Mean Diurnal IOP Within Each Treatment Arm

(NCT02250612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 14

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) 1.5% Eye Drops-2.4
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) Eye Drops 1.125%-2.9
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) Eye Drops 0.75%-2.5
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) 0.375 % Eye Drops-2.4
Timolol Maleate 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution-5.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Glaucoma Quality of Life Questionnaire (GQL-15) Scores Within Each Treatment Arm

The GQL-15 is a 15 item, 4-domain tool. GQL-15 scoring ranges from 0 to 75. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life. (NCT02250612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 29

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) 1.5% Eye Drops20
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) 1.125% Eye Drops20.7
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) 0.75% Eye Drops19.4
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) Eye Drops 0.375%22
Timolol Maleate 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution18.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in the Mean Diurnal IOP Within Each Treatment Arm

(NCT02250612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 28

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) 0.375 % Eye Drops-2.4
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) 0.75 % Eye Drops-3.2
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) 1.125% Eye Drops-3.1
SYL040012 (Bamosiran) 1.5% Eye Drops-3.1
Timolol Maleate 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution-6.1

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 6 (Hour 2)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02250651)
Timeframe: Week 6 (Hour 2)

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg16.13
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg16.53
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) in the Study Eye to Week 12 (Hours 0 and 2)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. A mixed-effects model with repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analyses. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02250651)
Timeframe: Baseline (Up to 3 days prior to Day 1 at Hours 0 and 2) to Week 12 (Hours 0 and 2)

,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mmHg) (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline at Week 12, Hour 0Change from Baseline at Week 12, Hour 2
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg-6.18-6.72
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg-6.47-7.16
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator-6.11-6.36

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP in the Study Eye

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from baseline indicates a worsening. (NCT02250651)
Timeframe: Baseline (Up to 3 days prior to Day 1 at Hours 0 and 2) to Weeks 2 and 6 (Hours 0 and 2)

,,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Change from Baseline at Week 2, Hour 0Change from Baseline at Week 2, Hour 2Change from Baseline at Week 6, Hour 0Change from Baseline at Week 6, Hour 2
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg-6.94-7.38-6.93-7.33
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg-7.12-7.77-6.81-7.74
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator-6.36-6.67-6.35-6.69

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 6 (Hour 0)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02250651)
Timeframe: Week 6 (Hour 0)

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg17.05
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg16.93
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.51

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hour 2)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02250651)
Timeframe: Week 12 (Hour 2)

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg16.70
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg17.15
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.50

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 2 (Hour 2)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02250651)
Timeframe: Week 2 (Hour 2)

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg16.09
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg16.48
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.19

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 12 (Hour 0)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02250651)
Timeframe: Week 12 (Hour 0)

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg17.39
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg17.68
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.75

[back to top]

IOP in the Study Eye at Week 2 (Hour 0)

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the study eye. Measurements were taken at Hours 0 and 2. The study eye is defined as the eye that meets the entry criteria. If both eyes meet the entry criteria, the eye with the higher IOP at Baseline Hour 0 will be selected as the study eye. If both eyes had the same IOP at Hour 0, then the right eye was designated as the study eye. MMRM was used for analyses. (NCT02250651)
Timeframe: Week 2 (Hour 0)

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Bimatoprost SR 15 μg16.74
Bimatoprost SR 10 μg16.92
Timolol 0.5%: Comparator17.50

[back to top]

Non-inferiority of T2347 Compared With Xalacom® on Change in Mean IOP at 9.00 am (± 1 Hour) Between the Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84 in the Worse Eye

"the non-inferiority of T2347 unpreserved eye drops compared with Xalacom® on change in mean IOP at 9.00 am (± 1 hour) between the baseline (Day 0) and Day 84 in the worse eye.~Two relevant time points are considered for this primary criteria: D0 and Day 84." (NCT02278614)
Timeframe: Day 84

Interventionmm Hg (Least Squares Mean)
T2347-0.51
Xalacom-0.52

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in IOP at 9 AM

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Data from 4 and 8 weeks at 9 AM were pooled, and a negative change indicates an improvement. One eye (target eye) was used for the analysis. (NCT02325518)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Week 8 at 9 AM

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineChange at Pool (Week 4, Week 8)
BRI/TIM17.4-3.3
DOR/TIM17.3-2.9

[back to top]

Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at 11 AM

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Data from 4 and 8 weeks at 11 AM were pooled, and a negative change indicates an improvement. One eye (target eye) was used for the analysis. (NCT02325518)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 4, Week 8 at 11 AM

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
BaselineMean change pooled over Week 4 and Week 8
BRI/TIM17.0-3.3
DOR/TIM17.0-3.4

[back to top]

Dilated Fundus Exam: Cup-to-Disc-Ratio

The cup-to-disk-ratio is an eye test to assess the progression of glaucoma. The diameter of the cup is compared to the diameter of the disk and a ratio is determined. The normal cup-disk ratio is 0.3. An increase in the cup-to-disc-ratio is a possible indication of glaucoma. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Right Eye, Week 12Left Eye, Week 12
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)0.470.48
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)0.550.56
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)0.530.54

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Slit-Lamp Examination Findings at Week 12

The clinician examined and graded the eyelids, conjunctiva, cornea and anterior chamber of the eye with the aid of a slit-lamp, (conjunctival erythema was assessed as part of the examination). Fluorescein dye was instilled into the ocular cul-de-sac to facilitate this examination. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)0
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)0
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Automated Visual Field at Week 12

Automated Visual Field was examined used the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, a test that measures the entire area of peripheral vision that can be seen while the eye is focused on a central point. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

,,
Interventiondecibels (dB) (Mean)
BaselineChange from Baseline to Week 12
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-2.700.39
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-1.450.02
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)-2.58-0.18

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 8

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 8. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 8

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 8 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 8 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 8 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-4.56-3.98-3.22
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-3.68-3.31-3.23
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)-4.68-3.62-3.21

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 12

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 12. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 12 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 12 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 12 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-4.08-3.40-2.69
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-3.64-3.67-3.20
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)-3.37-2.74-2.34

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 6

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 6. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 6

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 6 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 6 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 6 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-5.30-4.42-3.77
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-4.87-4.40-3.73
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)-6.42-4.97-4.40

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP in Period C

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Weeks 14, 18 and 24. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Weeks 14, 18 and 24

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 14 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 14 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 14 (T=8 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 18 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 18 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 18 (T=8 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 24 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period C)-5.72-4.64-4.13-5.62-4.33-4.17-4.85-3.99-2.99

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Categories at Week 12

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Right Eye, 10+ Letter ImprovementRight Eye, 5+ Letter ImprovementRight Eye, No ChangeRight Eye, 5- Letter WorseningRight Eye, 10- Letter WorseningLeft Eye, 10+ Letter ImprovementLeft Eye, 5+ Letter ImprovementLeft Eye, No ChangeLeft Eye, 5- Letter WorseningLeft Eye, 10- Letter Worsening
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)2.811.161.122.22.85.619.461.113.90
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)05.357.928.97.9013.268.415.82.6
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)07.973.713.25.307.971.118.42.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Categories at Week 8

BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 8

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Right Eye, 10+ Letter ImprovementRight Eye, 5+ Letter ImprovementRight Eye, No ChangeRight Eye, 5- Letter WorseningRight Eye, 10- Letter WorseningLeft Eye, 10+ Letter ImprovementLeft Eye, 5+ Letter ImprovementLeft Eye, No ChangeLeft Eye, 5- Letter WorseningLeft Eye, 10- Letter Worsening
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)2.85.677.813.905.619.466.75.62.8
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)07.769.217.95.1020.566.77.75.1
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)2.618.465.813.202.610.568.415.82.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in IOP at Week 2

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. Diurnal IOP measurements were taken at 8 am (T=0 hour), 10 am (T=2 hour), and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at Week 2. IOP readings from both eyes were averaged to compute a single IOP value for each diurnal timepoint. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 2

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Change from Baseline to Week 2 (T=0 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 2 (T=2 hour)Change from Baseline to Week 2 (T=8 hour)
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-5.95-5.34-4.52
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)-4.56-4.14-3.76
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)-6.84-5.71-4.81

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events (AE) by Severity in Period A/B

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (eg, sign, symptom, disease, syndrome, intercurrent illness) that occurred in a study participant, regardless of the suspected cause during the study. An ocular AE is an AE that occurred in the eye and non-ocular is an AE that occurred not in the eye. Th investigator assessed the worst severity of each AE as: Mild=aware of sign or symptom, but readily tolerated, Moderate=discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity or Severe=incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) to Week 12

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ocular, MildOcular, ModerateOcular, SevereNon-ocular, MildNon-Ocular, ModerateNon-ocular, Severe
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)26.84.909.87.30
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)17.55.005.02.52.5
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)12.52.505.015.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Ocular and Non-ocular Adverse Events (AE) by Severity in Period C

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (eg, sign, symptom, disease, syndrome, intercurrent illness) that occurred in a study participant, regardless of the suspected cause during the study. An ocular AE is an AE that occurred in the eye and non-ocular is an AE that occurred not in the eye. The investigator assessed the worst severity of each AE as: Mild=aware of sign or symptom, but readily tolerated, Moderate=discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity or Severe=incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Week 12 to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ocular, MildOcular, ModerateOcular, SevereNon-ocular, MildNon-ocular, ModerateNon-ocular, Severe
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period C)23.95.305.34.40.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants by Dilated Fundus Exam Pathology Grade at Week 12

Dilated fundus examination pathology findings were noted, described and graded on a scale of None (0), Mild (+1), Moderate (+2) and Severe (+3). The percentage of participants in each grade is reported. (NCT02358369)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Right Eye, NoneLeft Eye, NoneRight Eye, MildLeft Eye, MildRight Eye, ModerateLeft Eye, Moderate
13 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)50.047.244.450.05.62.8
2.2 mg Bimatoprost Ocular Insert (Period A/B)71.171.126.326.32.62.6
Placebo Ocular Insert + Timolol 0.5% (Period A/B)63.262.234.235.12.62.7

[back to top]

IOP (Intraocular Pressure)

The primary efficacy outcome is mean IOP (NCT02558374)
Timeframe: 3 months

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Day 1, 0800 hoursDay 1, 1000 hoursDay 1, 1600 hoursDay 15, 0800 hoursDay 15, 1000 hoursDay 15, 1600 hoursDay 43, 0800 hoursDay 43, 1000 hoursDay 43, 1600 hoursDay 90, 0800 hoursDay 90, 1000 hoursDay 90, 1600 hours
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% & Placebo23.9322.6722.1719.2017.9317.7619.4518.1217.8919.2418.3018.02
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID23.8922.7722.0418.6017.8017.8518.5217.8917.8818.3517.6017.66

[back to top]

Extent of Exposure

Exposure to study medication in days for all treatment groups (NCT02558374)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventiondays (Mean)
AR-13324 Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% & Placebo147.4
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID167.7

[back to top]

Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment Height

Measurement based on SD-OCT (NCT02571972)
Timeframe: 3 visits (8-12 weeks)

Interventionmicrons (Mean)
Pre-enrollment visitEnrollment visitStudy visit 1Study visit 2Study visit 3Final visit
Dorzolamide-timolol275.4277.4258.9227.8275.4239.9

[back to top]

Maximum Subretinal Fluid Height

Measurement based on SD-OCT (NCT02571972)
Timeframe: 3 visits (8-12 weeks)

Interventionmicrons (Mean)
Pre-enrollment visitEnrollment visitStudy visit 1Study visit 2Study visit 3Final visit
Dorzolamide-timolol111.5126.677.962.056.549.5

[back to top]

Mean Central Subfield Thickness (CST)

Mean central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) on 1 visit prior to enrollment and all visits subsequent to study enrollment (NCT02571972)
Timeframe: 3 visits (8-12 weeks)

Interventionmicrons (Mean)
Pre-enrollment visitEnrollment visitStudy visit 1Study visit 2Study visit 3Final visit
Dorzolamide-timolol422.9419.7364.5346.7326.9334.1

[back to top]

Visual Acuity

LogMAR Visual acuity on enrollment and final visit (NCT02571972)
Timeframe: 3 visits (8-12 weeks)

InterventionlogMAR (Mean)
BaselineFinal
Dorzolamide-timolol0.540.48

[back to top]

Timolol Eye Drops in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Headache

"Percent of migraine attacks at 0 or 1 on the 4-point Rating Scale recommended by the International Headache Society:~0: no headache~mild headache~moderate headaches~severe headache" (NCT02630719)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionpercentage of migraine attacks at 0 or 1 (Mean)
Timolol Eye Drops78
Artificial Tears67

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Diurnal IOP at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Diurnal IOP percentage change was defined as the average of the two changes from baseline (timepoints 9 AM, 11 AM). A more negative percentage change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Simbrinza + Duotrav-20.7
Vehicle + Duotrav-11.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in IOP (09:00, 11:00) at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Baseline 9:00 HrBaseline 11:00 HrChange from Baseline 9:00 HrChange from Baseline 11:00 Hr
Simbrinza + Duotrav22.221.4-4.4-5.4
Vehicle + Duotrav22.521.4-3.2-2.5

[back to top]

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in IOP (09:00, 11:00) at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. A more negative percentage change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Percent change at 9:00 HrPercent change at 11:00 Hr
Simbrinza + Duotrav-20.2-25.0
Vehicle + Duotrav-14.1-11.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) (Mean of Changes at 09:00 and 11:00 Time Points) at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Diurnal IOP change was defined as the average of the two changes from baseline (timepoints 9 AM, 11 AM). A more negative change from baseline indicates a greater improvement, i.e., a reduction of IOP. Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Simbrinza + Duotrav-4.5
Vehicle + Duotrav-2.4

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal IOP at Week 6

IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Diurnal IOP was defined as the average of the two time points measured (9 AM, 11 AM). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Only one eye (study eye) was used for the analyses. (NCT02730871)
Timeframe: Week 6

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Simbrinza + Duotrav17.1
Vehicle + Duotrav19.4

[back to top]

IOP on Day 28

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP was measured at the following three time points: 8 am (T=0 hour), 12 pm (T=4 hour) and 4 pm (T=8 hour). The IOP measured in the two eyes was averaged to compute a single IOP value for each timepoint. (NCT02742649)
Timeframe: Day 28

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Day 28 (T=0 hour)Day 28 (T=4 hour)Day 28 (T=8 hour)
Bimatoprost Ocular Insert18.4419.5918.77
Fixed Combination (FC) Ocular Insert18.0318.5417.26
Timolol Ocular Insert19.7520.0919.20

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) on Day 8

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP was measured at the following three time points: 8 am (T=0 hour), 12 pm (T=4 hour) and 4 pm (T=8 hour). The IOP measured in the two eyes was averaged to compute a single IOP value for each timepoint. (NCT02742649)
Timeframe: Day 8

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Day 8 (T=0 hour)Day 8 (T=4 hour)Day 8 (T=8 hour)
Bimatoprost Ocular Insert19.1518.9617.84
Fixed Combination (FC) Ocular Insert17.8317.5117.05
Timolol Ocular Insert19.5919.8819.66

[back to top]

IOP During Open Label Period

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP was measured at the following three time points: 8 am (T=0 hour), 12 pm (T=4 hour) and 4 pm (T=8 hour) at the start (Day 98) and end (Day 112) of the Open Label Period during which participants were treated with timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution twice daily. The IOP measured in the two eyes was averaged to compute a single IOP value for each timepoint. (NCT02742649)
Timeframe: Day 98, Day 112

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Day 98 (T=0 hour)Day 98 (T=4 hour)Day 98 (T=8 hour)Day 112 (T=0 hour)Day 112 (T=4 hour)Day 112 (T=8 hour)
Bimatoprost Ocular Insert22.6922.3822.8820.6518.5218.43
Fixed Combination (FC) Ocular Insert22.6121.6720.7419.2117.6217.51
Timolol Ocular Insert23.2422.9922.6319.7118.7518.19

[back to top]

IOP on Day 16

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP was measured at the following three time points: 8 am (T=0 hour), 12 pm (T=4 hour) and 4 pm (T=8 hour). The IOP measured in the two eyes was averaged to compute a single IOP value for each timepoint. (NCT02742649)
Timeframe: Day 16

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Day 16 (T=0 hour)Day 16 (T=4 hour)Day 16 (T=8 hour)
Bimatoprost Ocular Insert18.0818.6418.54
Fixed Combination (FC) Ocular Insert18.2917.9517.21
Timolol Ocular Insert20.8121.0819.43

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Ocular and Non-Ocular Adverse Events

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. Reported here is the number of participants with adverse events related to the eye as well as number of participants with all other adverse events. (NCT02742649)
Timeframe: From Randomization (Day 0) to Day 70

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
OcularNon-Ocular
Bimatoprost Ocular Insert1410
Fixed Combination (FC) Ocular Insert1311
Timolol Ocular Insert105

[back to top]

IOP on Day 70

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP was measured at the following three time points: 8 am (T=0 hour), 12 pm (T=4 hour) and 4 pm (T=8 hour). The IOP measured in the two eyes was averaged to compute a single IOP value for each timepoint. (NCT02742649)
Timeframe: Day 70

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Day 70 (T=0 hour)Day 70 (T=4 hour)Day 70 (T=8 hour)
Bimatoprost Ocular Insert17.7818.7118.61
Fixed Combination (FC) Ocular Insert17.6018.0917.14
Timolol Ocular Insert17.7918.4818.78

[back to top]

IOP on Day 49

IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. IOP was measured at the following three time points: 8 am (T=0 hour), 12 pm (T=4 hour) and 4 pm (T=8 hour). The IOP measured in the two eyes was averaged to compute a single IOP value for each timepoint. (NCT02742649)
Timeframe: Day 49

,,
Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Day 49 (T=0 hour)Day 49 (T=4 hour)Day 49 (T=8 hour)
Bimatoprost Ocular Insert18.8819.3518.48
Fixed Combination (FC) Ocular Insert18.5517.7717.23
Timolol Ocular Insert18.6319.6719.13

[back to top]

Severe Adverse Events

The number and percent of subjects with severe adverse events in the study eye (NCT02754596)
Timeframe: Post-op through Month 36

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Travoprost Intraocular Implant, High Elution2
Travoprost Intraocular Implant, Low Elution2
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5%2

[back to top]

IOP (mmHg) Change From Baseline at Week 12

Change from baseline in IOP (measured in mmHg) at week 12. Negative values represent reductions in IOP from baseline. (NCT02754596)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Travoprost Intraocular Implant, High Elution-8.3
Travoprost Intraocular Implant, Low Elution-7.7
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution, 0.5%-7.5

[back to top]

Change in Hemangioma Quality of Life (IH-QoL) Assessment for Infants

Absolute change in IH-QoL score scale from Day 0 to end of study within each treatment arm. The IH-QoL score scale consists of 4 domains (physical symptom of patient, social functioning of patient, social and psychological functioning of caregiver, and emotional functioning of caregiver) and 29 items, with each item scored on a Likert scale : 0 = never a problem, 1 = almost never a problem, 2 = sometimes a problem, 3 = often a problem and 4 = almost always a problem). The total range is 0-116; the higher the total number indicates a worse outcome. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: baseline, day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
0.25% Timolol Treatment35.3
0.5% Timolol Treatment37.4
Non-Intervention Group32.6

[back to top]

Change in Hemangioma Dynamic Complication Scale (HDCS)

Absolute change in hemangioma dynamic complication scale from Day 0 to end of study within each treatment arm. The HDCS provides a 6-point severity grading system for 12 individual hemangioma-related complications (grade 0 represents absent to minimal; grade 5 = most severe). The total score ranges from 0-60. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: baseline, day 180

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
0.25% Timolol Treatment0
0.5% Timolol Treatment-0.1
Non-Intervention Group0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partial Response in Hemangioma Color as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm and Compared With Untreated Controls

The VAS-color is a 100 mm scale used to independently grade hemangioma color. -100 indicates hemangioma is twice as intense, 0 indicates no change, and +100 indicates complete resolution. Partial response is defined as >30% and up to 80% reduction in color of hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0.25% Timolol Treatment32
0.5% Timolol Treatment34
Non-Intervention Group19

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partial Response of Hemangioma Volume as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm and Compared With Untreated Controls

The VAS-volume is a 100 mm scale used to independently grade hemangioma volume. -100 indicates hemangioma has doubled in size, 0 indicates no change, and +100 indicates complete shrinkage. Partial response is defined as >20% and up to 80% reduction in volumetric size of hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0.25% Timolol Treatment24
0.5% Timolol Treatment28
Non-Intervention Group15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partial Response of Hemangioma Volume as Measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale) Within Each Treatment Arm

The VAS-volume is a 100 mm scale used to independently grade hemangioma volume. -100 indicates hemangioma has doubled in size, 0 indicates no change, and +100 indicates complete shrinkage. Partial response is defined as >20% and up to 80% reduction in volumetric size of hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0.25% Timolol Treatment24
0.5% Timolol Treatment28

[back to top]

Comparison of Partial Response of Hemangioma Color From Baseline to 180 Days, Within Each Treatment Arm

Comparison of partial response of hemangioma color (partial response or greater as assessed by VAS-color) between the two treatment arms. Partial response: >30% and up to 80% reduction in color of hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
0.25% Timolol Treatment32
0.5% Timolol Treatment34

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reach Partial Response, Assessed by Hemangioma Color

Assess time to partial response or greater by VAS-color, comparing baseline to day 30, day 60, day 120 and day 180. Partial response: >30% and up to 80% reduction in color of hemangioma (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 180 days

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
30-Day Visit60-Day Visit120-Day Visit180-Day Visit
0.25% Timolol Treatment17192529
0.5% Timolol Treatment20212830
Non-Intervention Group0245

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Reach Partial Response, Assessed by Volume

Assess time to partial response or greater by VAS-volume, comparing baseline to day 30, day 60, day 120 and day 180. Partial response: >20% and up to 80% reduction in volumetric size of hemangioma (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: 30 days, 60 days, 120 days, 180 days

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
30-Day Visit60-Day Visit120-Day Visit180-Day Visit
0.25% Timolol Treatment12171823
0.5% Timolol Treatment14192124
Non-Intervention Group0134

[back to top]

Number of Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events of Special Interest in Infants Treated With Topical Timolol Maleate

Serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest from randomization to Day 180 in infants treated with topical timolol maleate (0.25% and 0.5%) GFS for the treatment of infantile hemangioma. (NCT02913612)
Timeframe: up to 270 days

,
Interventionadverse events (Number)
AEs of Special InterestSerious AEs
0.25% Timolol Treatment143
0.5% Timolol Treatment142

[back to top]

Change in Visual Acuity

Change in mean best available visual acuity from baseline to final visit. (NCT03034772)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 weeks

InterventionlogMAR (Mean)
Dorzolamide-timolol0.031
Artificial Tears0.018

[back to top]

Change in Mean Maximum Subretinal Fluid (SRF) Height

Change in mean maximum SRF height on spectral domain optical coherence tomography from baseline to final visit. (NCT03034772)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 weeks

Interventionmicrons (Mean)
Dorzolamide-timolol-49.4
Artificial Tears-22.2

[back to top]

Change in Mean Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Height

Change in mean maximum PED height on spectral domain optical coherence tomography from baseline to final visit. (NCT03034772)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 weeks

Interventionmicrons (Mean)
Dorzolamide-timolol-39.1
Artificial Tears1.1

[back to top]

Change in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

Change in mean IOP from baseline to final visit. (NCT03034772)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 weeks

Interventionmm Hg (Mean)
Dorzolamide-timolol-1.81
Artificial Tears-0.78

[back to top]

Change in Mean Central Subfield Thickness (CST)

Change in mean CST on spectral domain optical coherence tomography from baseline to the final visit (NCT03034772)
Timeframe: Baseline and 18 weeks

Interventionmicrons (Mean)
Dorzolamide-timolol-36.6
Artificial Tears1.7

[back to top]

Number of Eyes With Foreign Body Sensation

Foreign body sensation will be evaluated by the presence or absence of it and the number of affected by group will be reported. (NCT03257813)
Timeframe: Baseline (day 1) crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventioneyes (Number)
basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30)Final visit (day 60)
Sequence A14145
Sequence B14167

[back to top]

Number of Eyes With Tearing

Tearing will be evaluated by the presence or absence of it and the number of affected by group will be reported (NCT03257813)
Timeframe: Baseline (day 1) crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventioneyes (Number)
basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30)Final visit (day 60)
Sequence A987
Sequence B299

[back to top]

Visual Acuity (VA)

"The VA will be evaluated basally, without refractive correction with the Snellen chart. A Snellen chart is placed at a standard distance: 20 ft. At this distance, the symbols on the line representing normal acuity subtend. This line, designated 20/20 is the smallest line that a person with normal acuity can read at a distance of 20fs. the scale consists of 11 lines of letters of different size, the size of the letter gives a fractional value according to the visual acuity of the patient, the value is inversely proportional to the visual acuity, if the denominator is greater the visual acuity will be less.~Line 1: 20/200 Line 2: 20/100, Line 3: 20/70, line 4: 20/50, line 5: 20/40, Line 6: 20/30, line 7: 20/25, Line 8: 20/20, line 9: 20/15, line 10: 20/13, line 11: 20/10. the differences between groups in the basal, cross over and final visit will be evaluated." (NCT03257813)
Timeframe: Visual Acuity at Baseline (day 1) crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30)Final visit (day 60)
Sequence A38.3136.8538.98
Sequence B39.4840.4335.50

[back to top]

Conjunctival Hyperemia

the conjunctival hyperemia will be evaluated by the presence or absence of it and the percentage of affected by group will be reported. (NCT03257813)
Timeframe: Baseline (day 1) crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventionpercentage of eyes (Number)
basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30)Final visit (day 60)
Sequence A39.637.520.8
Sequence B11.125.913.0

[back to top]

Chemosis

Chemosis: qualitative ordinal variable, will be evaluated by the presence or absence of it and the percentage of affected by group will be reported. (NCT03257813)
Timeframe: Baseline (day 1) crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventionpercentage of chemosis (Number)
basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30)Final visit (day 60)
Sequence A000
Sequence B3.73.70

[back to top]

Adverse Events

The presence of adverse events by percentage between groups will be evaluated. the scale is present or absent. (NCT03257813)
Timeframe: 75 days, includes the security call

,
Interventionpercentage of adverse events (Number)
mildmoderatesevere
Krytantek Ofteno18.272.79.1
PRO-12255.644.40

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

"Intraocular pressure, Unit: Millimeters of mercury (mmHg) type of variable: Continuous, Measurement method: Goldman applanation tonometry. Normal intraocular pressure 11-21 mmHg.~The change between the IOP of both groups was compared (sequence 1 versus sequence 2) of the data obtained at the end of each period (day 30 and day 60)." (NCT03257813)
Timeframe: Change from Baseline intraocular pressure at day 30 and 60.

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30)Final visit (day 60)
Sequence A13.6013.1912.60
Sequence B12.1311.8011.24

[back to top]

Eye Burning

Eye ocular burning will be evaluated by the presence or absence of it and the number of affected by group will be reported. (NCT03257813)
Timeframe: Baseline (day 1) crossover visit (day 30) and final visit (day 60)

,
Interventionnumber of eye burning (Number)
basal visit (day 1)Crossover visit (day 30)Final visit (day 60)
Sequence A161214
Sequence B181819

[back to top]

Comparison of Percent Changes in Optic Nerve Head Flow Index in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography

Comparison of the percent change in Optic Nerve Head Flow Index detected by OCT (optical coherence tomography) Angiography using spectrum amplitude decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm before and after the use of topical brimonidine or timolol eye drops to lower eye pressure. The Control groups represent the percent changes in flow index after using artificial tears. The medicine groups (Brimonidine/Timolol) represents the percent changes in flow index after using topical brimonidine or timolol drops to lower eye pressure. (NCT03323164)
Timeframe: 5.5 hours (3 separate 30 minute OCT Angiography scans with 2 hour post-intervention in between each scan)

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
OverallPOAGNTGOHTN
Brimonidine-5.24-13.73-4.170.55
Control B2.6912.400.32-2.68
Control T1.96-2.386.211.21
Timolol-0.69-1.652.47-3.52

[back to top]

Comparison of Percent Changes in Optic Nerve Head Vessel Density in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography

Comparison of the percent change in optic nerve head vessel density detected by OCT (optical coherence tomography) Angiography using spectrum amplitude decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm before and after the use of topical brimonidine or timolol eye drops to lower eye pressure. The Control groups represent the percent changes in vessel density after using artificial tears. The medicine groups (Brimonidine/Timolol) represents the percent changes in vessel density after using topical brimonidine or timolol drops to lower eye pressure. (NCT03323164)
Timeframe: 5.5 hours (3 separate 30 minute OCT Angiography scans with 2 hour post-intervention in between each scan)

,,,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
OverallPOAGNTGOHTN
Brimonidine1.08-1.002.441.65
Control B1.272.222.13-0.34
Control T0.32-2.681.701.67
Timolol0.912.650.160.08

[back to top]

Comparison of Percent Changes in Peripapillary Vessel Density in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography

Comparison of the percent change in peripapillary vessel density detected by OCT (optical coherence tomography) Angiography using spectrum amplitude decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm before and after the use of topical brimonidine or timolol eye drops to lower eye pressure. The Control groups represent the percent changes in vessel density after using artificial tears. The medicine groups (Brimonidine/Timolol) represents the percent changes in vessel density after using topical brimonidine or timolol drops to lower eye pressure. (NCT03323164)
Timeframe: 5.5 hours (3 separate 30 minute OCT Angiography scans with 2 hour post-intervention in between each scan)

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Overall groupPOAGNTGOHTN
Brimonidine-0.51-1.62-0.04-0.58
Control B1.702.892.020.44
Control T-2.05-2.8-3.420.34
Timolol2.590.964.122.37

[back to top]

Comparison of Percent Changes in Peripapillary Flow Index in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography

Comparison of the percent change in peripapillary flow index detected by OCT (optical coherence tomography) Angiography using spectrum amplitude decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm before and after the use of topical brimonidine or timolol eye drops to lower eye pressure. The Control groups represent the percent changes in flow index after using artificial tears. The medicine groups (Brimonidine/Timolol) represents the percent changes in flow index after using topical brimonidine or timolol drops to lower eye pressure. (NCT03323164)
Timeframe: 5.5 hours (3 separate 30 minute OCT Angiography scans with 2 hour post-intervention in between each scan)

,,,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Overall groupPOAGNTGOHTN
Brimonidine-5.23-14.91-4.871.71
Control B2.3512.810.22-3.89
Control T1.61-3.657.57-0.26
Timolol0.330.692.76-2.92

[back to top]

Changes in Vessel Density in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography

Percent change in peripapillary vessel density detected by OCT (optical coherence tomography) Angiography using spectrum amplitude decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm with the use of topical brimonidine or timolol eye drops to lower eye pressure. (NCT03323164)
Timeframe: 5.5 hours (3 separate 30 minute OCT Angiography scans with 2 hour post-intervention in between each scan)

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Overall groupPOAGNTGOHTN
Brimonidine Group-0.51-0.96-0.04-0.58
Timolol Group2.590.964.122.37

[back to top]

Changes in Flow Index in Treatment Groups Assessed by OCT Angiography

Percent change in peripapillary Flow Index detected by OCT (optical coherence tomography) Angiography using spectrum amplitude decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm with the use of topical brimonidine or timolol eye drops to lower eye pressure. (NCT03323164)
Timeframe: 5.5 hours (3 separate 30 minute OCT Angiography scans with 2 hour post-intervention in between each scan)

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
Overall groupPOAGNTGOHTN
Brimonidine Group-5.23-12.55-4.871.71
Timolol Group0.330.692.76-2.92

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 (Third Key Secondary Endpoint)

"Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1: Analysis using Mixed-Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) on observed cases.~Mean Diurnal IOP at week 1 is defined as the average IOP of all three timepoints (8AM, 10AM and 4PM) at week 1." (NCT03691649)
Timeframe: Week 1

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution18.1
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5%18.4

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 with baseline mean diurnal IOP less than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint) (NCT03691649)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Week 1

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution17.917.216.8
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5%18.217.317.2

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6 with baseline mean diurnal IOP less than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint) (NCT03691649)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution18.718.017.6
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5%17.817.417.1

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure at Month 3

Intraocular Pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured with calibrated Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time points throughout the day. Analysis using Mixed-Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) (NCT03691649)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Month 3

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution19.718.818.6
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5%18.517.717.8

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure at Week 1

Intraocular Pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured with calibrated Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time points throughout the day. Analysis using Mixed-Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) (NCT03691649)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Week 1

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution19.018.017.5
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5%19.118.217.9

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure at Week 6

Intraocular Pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured with calibrated Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time points throughout the day. Analysis using Mixed-Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) (NCT03691649)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution19.818.918.5
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5%18.418.017.7

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 with baseline mean diurnal IOP less than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint) (NCT03691649)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Month 3

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution18.617.817.7
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5%17.716.917.2

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 (First Key Secondary Endpoint)

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3: Analysis using Mixed-Effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) on observed cases. (NCT03691649)
Timeframe: Month 3

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution19.0
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5%18.0

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6

Intraocular Pressure: Analysis of IOP Score using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) on Observed Cases (Study Eye, Full Analysis Set). Intraocular Pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured with calibrated Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time points throughout the day. (NCT03691662)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% QD (20:00) and Vehicle QD (08:00)20.419.519.2
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID (20:00 & 08:00)19.518.818.8

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 with baseline mean diurnal IOP less than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint) (NCT03691662)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at week 1

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% QD (20:00) and Vehicle QD (08:00)18.317.517.0
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID (20:00 & 08:00)19.118.218.0

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1

Intraocular Pressure: Analysis of IOP Score using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) on Observed Cases (Study Eye, Full Analysis Set). Intraocular Pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured with calibrated Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time points throughout the day. (NCT03691662)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Week 1

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% QD (20:00) and Vehicle QD (08:00)19.418.517.9
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID (20:00 & 08:00)19.718.918.6

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 with baseline mean diurnal IOP less than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint) (NCT03691662)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at month 3

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% QD (20:00) and Vehicle QD (08:00)18.918.318.1
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID (20:00 & 08:00)18.818.018.0

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3

Intraocular Pressure: Analysis of IOP Score using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) on Observed Cases (Study Eye, Full Analysis Set). Intraocular Pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye was measured with calibrated Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time points throughout the day. (NCT03691662)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Month 3

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% QD (20:00) and Vehicle QD (08:00)20.019.419.1
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID (20:00 & 08:00)19.618.919.0

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 1 (Third Key Secondary Endpoint)

"The third key secondary endpoint, mean diurnal IOP at Week 1, the hypothesis of superiority of DE-117 to timolol was tested. Analysis using MMRM on Observed Cases.~Mean Diurnal IOP is defined as the average IOP of all three timepoints (8AM, 10AM and 4PM) at week 1." (NCT03691662)
Timeframe: week 1

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% QD (20:00) and Vehicle QD (08:00)18.6
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID (20:00 & 08:00)19.1

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 3 (First Key Secondary Endpoint)

To determine if the mean diurnal IOP reduction with DE-117 ophthalmic solution 0.002% is superior to that of Timolol Maleate ophthalmic solution 0.5% at Month 3 in subjects with OAG or OHT. Mean Diurnal IOP is defined as the average IOP of all three timepoints (8AM, 10AM and 4PM) at Month 3. (NCT03691662)
Timeframe: Month 3

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% QD (20:00) and Vehicle QD (08:00)19.5
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID (20:00 & 08:00)19.2

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6 With Baseline Mean Diurnal IOP Less Than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint)

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Week 6 with baseline mean diurnal IOP less than 25 mmHg (Second Key Secondary Endpoint) (NCT03691662)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-117 Ophthalmic Solution 0.002% QD (20:00) and Vehicle QD (08:00)19.418.618.4
Timolol Maleate Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% BID (20:00 & 08:00)18.918.218.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Satisfied With Intervention

"Measured by patient-reported satisfaction questionnaire. Satisfaction level was looked at as satisfactory and very satisfactory compared to neutral and unsatisfied." (NCT03836664)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of Participants Satisfied Post Timolol Intervention3
Number of Participants Satisfied Post Placebo6

[back to top]

Adverse Reaction From Using Timolol Eye Drops

Measured by number of adverse events experienced by the participants from the intervention. Each adverse event was counted as one. (NCT03836664)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionevents (Number)
Total Number of Adverse Events Post Timolol Intervention2
Total Number of Adverse Events Post Placebo3

[back to top]

Headache Severity

Measure of the change in severity using visual analogue pain scale ranging from 0-10 with zero being no pain and ten being worst pain. Scale will be completed after each migraine episode over course of participation in study, up to 8 weeks. (NCT03836664)
Timeframe: Headache/ pain severity at onset and at 120 minutes post intervention use

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
All Participants Post Timolol2.00
All Participants Post Placebo2.00

[back to top]

Changes in Intraocular Pressure

the intraocular pressure will be evaluated by means of the Goldman applanation tonometry whose unit of measurement is millimeters of mercury (mmHg), it is a continuous variable and its normality range is between 11 - 21 mmHg (NCT03966365)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 8)

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
PRO-12212.32
Krytantek Ofteno®11.78

[back to top]

Eye Comfort Index

"It is a questionnaire designed to measure the irritation of the ocular surface with Rasch analysis to produce estimates on a linear scale of intervals (ratings: 0-100).The Eye comfort index contains items that focus on the discomfort associated with alterations of the ocular surface.~Values closer or equal to one hundred (100) correspond to greater discomfort, while values closer or equal to zero (0) correspond to greater comfort." (NCT03966365)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 8)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
PRO-12224.6
Krytantek Ofteno®27.0

[back to top]

Number of Adverse Events

primary security variable the adverse events will be evaluated with a scale of Present / Absent, it is a nominal variable, the normal value is absent. it will be evaluated by the number of reported cases per group. (NCT03966365)
Timeframe: during the 14 days of evaluation, including the safety call (day 14)

Interventionadverse events (Number)
PRO-12228
Krytantek Ofteno®31

[back to top]

Participants With Chemosis

The chemosis will be evaluated, as a nominal variable, by direct observation and it will be staged as present and absent, where the normality is that said variable is absent. (NCT03966365)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 8)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PRO-1220
Krytantek Ofteno®0

[back to top]

Visual Ability

"The visual capacity variable will be reported using as a unit of measure a fraction, this is taken from a visual test with the Snellen primer, it is a Nominal type variable. where the optimal vision is 20/20 or 1.0 in decimal and the worst 20/200 or 0.1 in decimal number.~For the appropriate management of the data, the result of the fraction obtained from the snellen scale is transformed to decimals, in this case subjects close to or equal to 1.0 have better visual acuity while subjects close to or equal to 0.1 have worse visual acuity.~The decimal equivalence scale is the result of the division of the fraction obtained in the Snellen chart. where 20/20 = 1.0; Do not confuse with Logmar scale where 20/20 = 0.0~Equivalences Snellen Scale = decimals: 20/200=0.1, 20/100=0.2, 20/50=0.4, 20/40=0.5, 20/30=0.66, 20/25=0.8, 20/20=1.0, etc." (NCT03966365)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 8)

InterventionDecimal score (Mean)
PRO-1220.949
Krytantek Ofteno®0.907

[back to top]

Number of Eyes With Epithelial Defects by Grade

The epithelial defects will be evaluated by means of two stains, green lissamine and fluorescein, it is a discrete variable that will be realized by direct observation, it will be staged according to the degrees of the oxford scale that go from 0 to 5 (0-V) according to its severity, where 0 is the normal lower limit and 5 the upper limit of defects. (NCT03966365)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 8)

,
Interventioneyes (Number)
Green lissamine grade 0Green lissamine grade 1Green lissamine grade 2Green lissamine grade 3Green lissamine grade 4Fluorescein grade 0Fluorescein grade 1Fluorescein grade 2Fluorescein grade 3Fluorescein grade 4
Krytantek Ofteno®164400222000
PRO-122202000220000

[back to top]

Participants With Conjunctival Hyperemia (CH) by Grade

Conjunctival hyperemia will be evaluated as an ordinal variable, by direct observation and staged using the Efron scale as Normal / Very Light / Mild / Moderate / Severe. Based on this scale, the normal and mild stages are considered without pathologies or normal. Mild, moderate and severe are considered pathological. (NCT03966365)
Timeframe: will be evaluated at the end of the treatment, at the final visit (day 8)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Normal (0)Very mild (1)Mild (2)Moderate (3)Severe (4)
Krytantek Ofteno®93000
PRO-122100100

[back to top]

Change in Assisted Epistaxis Severity Scale (aESS) Score From Baseline at 8 Week Follow-up

"Assessment of epistaxis severity will be obtained by the validated instrument, the Epistaxis Severity Score (ESS). To complete the ESS, patients are asked to consider typical symptoms over the previous 3 months. The ESS contains 6 items - frequency, duration, and intensity of nosebleeds, whether patient has sought medication attention, whether patient is anemic, and whether patient has received a blood transfusion. The overall score ranges from 0 to 10, with severity of nosebleed based on score graded as None composite score of 0-1, Mild 1-4, Moderate 4-7, and Severe as 7-10.The minimal important difference noticeable by both patients and clinicians in the ESS scoring system is estimated as a change of 0.71. The scoring and MCID of the aESS is the same as the ESS.~The aESS references a participant's epistaxis over the past 1 month, and the change in aESS was calculated as the aESS score at 8 weeks minus the aESS score at baseline." (NCT04139018)
Timeframe: Baseline to 8-week follow-up

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Timolol Gel Arm2.32
Placebo Gel Arm1.96

[back to top]

Part 2: Mean Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Day 14 - Study Eye

IOP is a measurement of the pressure inside the eye and was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Study participants used the study medications in both eyes for 14 days. One eye was designated as the Study Eye at baseline: eyes that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. If both eyes were eligible, the study eye was the eye with higher IOP at Baseline at Hour 0. If both eyes had the same IOP at this timepoint, the right eye was designated as the study eye. IOP was measured at Baseline and Day 14 at Hours 0, 2, 4 and 8. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline IOP at Day 14, Hour 2, the timepoint of the peak effect of timolol. (NCT04149899)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14

,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Baseline Hour 0Baseline Hour 2Baseline Hour 4Baseline Hour 8Day 14 Hour 0Day 14 Hour 2Day 14 Hour 4Day 14 Hour 8
Part 2: Timolol 0.5%27.126.725.826.1-5.3-6.0-4.0-5.5
Part 2: WB007 0.15%26.324.825.024.3-2.6-4.9-4.3-1.8
Part 2: WB007 0.4%26.124.824.823.9-3.3-5.1-3.6-1.8

[back to top]

Part 2: Mean IOP at Day 14 - Study Eye

IOP is a measurement of the pressure inside the eye and was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Study participants used the study medications in both eyes for 14 days. One eye was designated as the Study Eye at baseline: eyes that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. If both eyes were eligible, the study eye was the eye with higher IOP at Baseline at Hour 0. If both eyes had the same IOP at this timepoint, the right eye was designated as the study eye. IOP was measured at Baseline and Day 14 at Hours 0, 2, 4 and 8. The primary timepoint was at Day 14, Hour 2, the timepoint of the peak effect of timolol. (NCT04149899)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14

,,
Interventionmillimeters of mercury (mm Hg) (Mean)
Baseline, Hour 0Baseline, Hour 2Baseline, Hour 4Baseline, Hour 8Day 14, Hour 0Day 14, Hour 2Day 14, Hour 4Day 14, Hour 8
Part 2: Timolol 0.5%27.126.725.826.121.820.721.820.6
Part 2: WB007 0.15%26.324.825.024.323.719.920.722.6
Part 2: WB007 0.4%26.124.824.823.922.919.721.222.1

[back to top]

Mean Diurnal Intraocular Pressure at Month 3

Mean diurnal Intraocular Pressure (IOP) was defined as the mean of the IOP valued at the three schedules timepoints (8:00, 10:00 and 16:00) at that visit for that subject. (NCT04742283)
Timeframe: Three months

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Timolol Maleate Opthalmic Solution 0.5% BID18.43
DE-126 Opthalmic Solution 0.002% QD and Vehicle QD18.15

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure at Month 3

Intraocular pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye was measure by the Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time-points throughout the day. Analysis using Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM). (NCT04742283)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Month 3

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-126 Opthalmic Solution 0.002% QD and Vehicle QD18.8018.0717.57
Timolol Maleate Opthalmic Solution 0.5% BID18.7818.1218.52

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure at Week 6

Intraocular pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye was measure by the Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time-points throughout the day. Analysis using Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM). (NCT04742283)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Week 6

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-126 Opthalmic Solution 0.002% QD and Vehicle QD18.3217.9617.52
Timolol Maleate Opthalmic Solution 0.5% BID18.7218.2918.24

[back to top]

Intraocular Pressure at Week 2

Intraocular pressure (IOP), the fluid pressure inside the eye was measure by the Goldmann applanation tonometer in millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 3 time-points throughout the day. Analysis using Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM). (NCT04742283)
Timeframe: 08:00, 10:00 and 16:00 at Week 2

,
InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
8:0010:0016:00
DE-126 Opthalmic Solution 0.002% QD and Vehicle QD18.9217.8617.15
Timolol Maleate Opthalmic Solution 0.5% BID19.0518.2817.91

[back to top]