Page last updated: 2024-11-08

bortezomib

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID387447
CHEMBL ID325041
CHEBI ID52717
SCHEMBL ID192129
MeSH IDM0350110

Synonyms (125)

Synonym
peptide boronate
c19h25bn4o4
AB01273951-02
AB01273951-01
nsc681239
NCI60_029010
velcade
dpba
mln-341
ldp-341
velcade (tn)
bortezomib (jan/usan/inn)
D03150
n-((1s)-1-benzyl-2-(((1r)-1-(dihydroxyboranyl)-3-methylbutyl)amino)2-oxoethylpyrazinecarboxamide
ps 341 (pharmaceutical)
nsc 681239
ldp 341
boronic acid, (3-methyl-1-((1-oxo-3-phenyl-2-((pyrazinylcarbonyl)amino)propyl)amino)butyl)-, (s-(r*,s*))-
mg 341
n-((1s)-1-benzyl-2-(((1r)-1-(dihydroxyboranyl)-3-methylbutyl)amino)-2-oxoethyl)pyrazinecarboxamide
((1r)-3-methyl-1-(((2s)-3-phenyl-2-((pyrazinylcarbonyl)amino)propanoyl)amino)butyl)boronic acid
boronic acid, ((1r)-3-methyl-1-(((2s)-1-oxo-3-phenyl-2-((pyrazinylcarbonyl)amino)propyl)amino)butyl)-
n-[(1r)-1-(dihydroxyboryl)-3-methylbutyl]-n-(pyrazin-2-ylcarbonyl)-l-phenylalaninamide
bortezomib ,
ps-341
ps 341
179324-69-7
lpd-341
boronic acid, [(1(r)-3-methyl-1-[[(2s)-1-oxo-3-phenyl-2-[(pyrazinylcarbonyl)amino]propyl]amino]butyl]-
pyz-phe-boroleu
[(1r)-3-methyl-1-[[(2s)-3-phenyl-2-(pyrazine-2-carbonylamino)propanoyl]amino]butyl]boronic acid
lpd 341
DB00188
[(1r)-3-methyl-1-({(2s)-3-phenyl-2-[(pyrazin-2-ylcarbonyl)amino]propanoyl}amino)butyl]boronic acid
velcade (millenium)
nsc-681239
S1013 ,
proscript boronic acid
n-[(1r)-1-(dihydroxyboranyl)-3-methylbutyl]-nalpha-(pyrazin-2-ylcarbonyl)-l-phenylalaninamide
n-[(1r)-1-(dihydroxyboranyl)-3-methylbutyl]-n(alpha)-(pyrazin-2-ylcarbonyl)-l-phenylalaninamide
CHEBI:52717 ,
bortezomib accord
bortezomib hydrate
CHEMBL325041 ,
bdbm50069989
(r)-3-methyl-1-((s)-3-phenyl-2-(pyrazine-2-carboxamido)propanamido)butylboronic acid
(r)-3-methyl-1-((s)-3-phenyl-2-(pyrazine-6-carboxamido)propanamido)butylboronic acid
A18332
((r)-3-methyl-1-((s)-3-phenyl-2-(pyrazine-2-carboxamido)propanamido)butyl)boronic acid
NCGC00242506-01
mg-341
dtxcid1020980
tox21_112672
cas-179324-69-7
dtxsid3040980 ,
tox21_112630
MLS004774142
smr003500787
boronic acid, b-[(1r)-3-methyl-1-[[(2s)-1-oxo-3-phenyl-2-[(2-pyrazinylcarbonyl)amino]propyl]amino]butyl]-
[(1r)-3-methyl-1-[[(2s)-1-oxo-3-phenyl-2-[(pyrazinylcarbonyl)amino]propyl]amino]butyl]boronic acid
69g8bd63pp ,
unii-69g8bd63pp
hsdb 7666
bortezomib [usan:inn:ban]
HY-10227
CS-1039
bortezomib,velcade
bortezomib (ps-341)
[(1r)-3-methyl-1-[[(2s)-3-phenyl-2-[(pyrazinylcarbonyl)amino]propanoyl]amino]butyl]boronic acid
bortezomib [vandf]
bortezomib [hsdb]
bortezomib [inn]
bortezomib [mi]
bortezomib hydrate [jan]
bortezomib [jan]
bortezomib [orange book]
bortezomib [who-dd]
bortezomib [mart.]
bortezomib [ema epar]
1610526-91-4
bortezomib [usan]
AKOS015909706
gtpl6391
GXJABQQUPOEUTA-RDJZCZTQSA-N
AM81235
SCHEMBL192129
tox21_112672_1
3MG0
NCGC00242506-02
[(1r)-3-methyl-1-[[(2s)-1-oxo-3-phenyl-2-[(pyrazinylcarbonyl)amino]propyl]amino]-butyl]boronic acid
(r)-3-methyl-1-((s)-3-phenyl-2-(pyrazine-2-carboxamido)propanamido)butan-2-ylboronic acid
HB4036
ps-341 [bortezomib]
AB01273951_03
mfcd09056737
bortezomib (velcade) ,
B5741
brotezamide
radiciol
sr-01000939863
SR-01000939863-2
(1r)-3-methyl-1-({(2s)-3-phenyl-2-[(2-pyrazinylcarbonyl)amino]propanoyl}amino)butylboronic acid, aldrichcpr
NCGC00242506-07
SW208077-3
bortezomib (velcade,mg-341,ps-341)
Q419319
AS-15721
BRD-K88510285-001-02-0
CCG-268449
NCGC00242506-06
nsc756655
nsc-756655
((r)-3-methyl-1-((s)-3-phenyl-2-(pyrazine-2-carboxamido)propanamido)butyl)boronicacid
EN300-657180
[(1r)-3-methyl-1-[(2s)-3-phenyl-2-[(pyrazin-2-yl)formamido]propanamido]butyl]boronic acid
BB164258
bortezomib- bio-x
bortexomib
n-((1r)-1-(dihydroxyboranyl)-3-methylbutyl)-n(alpha)-(pyrazin-2-ylcarbonyl)-l-phenylalaninamide
bortezomibum
l01xx32
bortezomib for injection
n-((1r)-1-(dihydroxyboryl)-3-methylbutyl)-n-(pyrazin-2-ylcarbonyl)-l-phenylalaninamide
bortezomib (mart.)
Z2213886907

Research Excerpts

Overview

Bortezomib (BTZ) is a well-characterized anticancer agent that inhibits proteasome, and its effect is associated with the function of miRs. It is a neurotoxic drug used in multiple myeloma and responsible for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with anticancer effects."( Proteasome inhibition by bortezomib parallels a reduction in head and neck cancer cells growth, and an increase in tumor-infiltrating immune cells.
Barillari, G; Bei, R; Benvenuto, M; Bonanno, E; Ciuffa, S; Coletta, M; Fazi, S; Focaccetti, C; Manzari, V; Masuelli, L; Modesti, A; Sbardella, D; Scimeca, M; Segni, M; Tundo, GR, 2021
)
1.65
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a well-characterized anticancer agent that inhibits proteasome, and its effect is associated with the function of miRs."( miR-466 Contributes to the Enhanced Antitumor Effect of Bortezomib on Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer by Inhibiting CCND1.
Jiang, DW; Liu, WY; Tang, YL; Wang, WH; Zhan, JM; Zhou, N, 2022
)
1.69
"Bortezomib is a neurotoxic drug used in multiple myeloma and responsible for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). "( Relation between auditory difficulties and bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma: a single-center cross-sectional study.
Balayssac, D; Barreau, F; Bay, JO; Busserolles, J; Cabrespine, A; Chaleteix, C; Giraudet, F; Kerckhove, N; Lemal, R; Nguyen, D; Pereira, B; Selvy, M; Soubrier, M, 2022
)
2.43
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a traditional medicine for MM treatment, but there are limitations for current treatment methods."( Trifluoperazine Synergistically Potentiates Bortezomib-Induced Anti-Cancer Effect in Multiple Myeloma via Inhibiting P38 MAPK/NUPR1.
Chen, J; Chen, X; Chen, Y; Jing, Z; Li, A; Yu, W, 2022
)
1.7
"Bortezomib is a frequently used chemotherapeutic agent in patients with multiple myeloma and care should be taken in terms of the risk of developing phrenic nerve palsy in patients. "( Asymptomatic unilateral phrenic nerve palsy after bortezomib treatment in a newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patient.
Coşkunpınar, M; Erdoğdu, B; Goker, H, 2023
)
2.61
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a promising drug used in CRC treatment; however, its main limitation result from drug resistance."( TRIM59 guards ER proteostasis and prevents Bortezomib-mediated colorectal cancer (CRC) cells' killing.
Chen, L; Feng, X; Shim, JS; Tao, S; Wu, Q; Yang, G; Zhang, L, 2022
)
1.71
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a proteasome inhibitor and may be explored for treating breast cancer."(
Chaurasiya, A; Gupta, U; Jain, S; Katke, S; Kuche, K; Kulkarni, O; Kumar, V; Mahale, A; Nakhate, KT; Rani, S; Sahoo, RK; Yadav, V, 2023
)
1.63
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a first-generation proteasome inhibitor with anti-tumor properties for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. "( Bortezomib induces cellular senescence in A549 lung cancer cells by stimulating telomere shortening.
Huang, C; Huang, S; Liu, H; Wang, L; Yin, H; Zhang, Z,
)
3.02
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a proteasome inhibitor widely used in MM therapy whose potent activity is often hampered by the development of resistance."( The Evidence That 25(OH)D3 and VK2 MK-7 Vitamins Influence the Proliferative Potential and Gene Expression Profiles of Multiple Myeloma Cells and the Development of Resistance to Bortezomib.
Baumert, B; Kulig, P; Machaliński, B; Łuczkowska, K, 2022
)
1.64
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a selective and reversible proteasome inhibitor and first line treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). "( Neurofilament light chain levels indicate acute axonal damage under bortezomib treatment.
Cebulla, N; Einsele, H; Flamm, L; Gommersbach, S; Kortüm, KM; Reinhold, AK; Rittner, H; Rogalla von Bieberstein, B; Runau, E; Schirmer, D; Sommer, C; Stengel, H; Zeller, D; Zhou, X, 2023
)
2.59
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a proteasome inhibitor serves as a first-line drug for multiple myeloma treatment. "( Lysosomal dysfunction in Schwann cells is involved in bortezomib-induced peripheral neurotoxicity.
Li, X; Wang, H; Wang, K; Wu, J; Wu, Z; Xu, G; Yan, W; Yang, M; Zhang, X; Zhu, D, 2023
)
2.6
"Bortezomib is an inhibitor of proteasomes and an anti-cancer drug. "( In situ Electrochemical Evaluation of the Interaction of dsDNA with the Proteasome Inhibitor Anticancer Drug Bortezomib.
Bunea, MC; Diculescu, VC; Enache, TA, 2023
)
2.57
"Bortezomib (Bor) is a specific and reversible inhibitor of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the 20S core of the proteasome, currently approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma."( Antitumoral effects of Bortezomib in malignant mesothelioma: evidence of mild endoplasmic reticulum stress in vitro and activation of T cell response in vivo.
Angiolini, V; Barillari, G; Bei, R; Benvenuto, M; Carrano, R; Cirone, M; Ferretti, E; Focaccetti, C; Mancini, P; Masuelli, L; Miele, MT; Mutti, L; Nardozi, D; Palumbo, C; Rufini, A; Tundo, GR, 2023
)
1.94
"Bortezomib (bort) is an effective therapeutic agent for patients with multiple myeloma (MM); however, most patients develop drug resistance. "( TRIM21 enhances bortezomib sensitivity in multiple myeloma by halting prosurvival autophagy.
Cai, Z; Cao, W; Chen, J; Chen, Q; Guo, X; He, J; Huang, X; Li, A; Liu, Y; Qu, J; Yang, L; Yao, S; Ye, S; Zhang, E, 2023
)
2.7
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that acts synergistically and additively with standard chemotherapy for ALL."( Phase 2 study of combination chemotherapy with bortezomib in children with relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Goto, H; Hara, J; Hiramatsu, H; Iijima-Yamashita, Y; Kikuta, A; Kosaka, Y; Miyagawa, N; Mochizuki, S; Nakayama, H; Ogawa, A; Ogawa, C; Sanada, M; Sekimizu, M; Tomizawa, D; Toyoda, H; Yoshimura, K, 2023
)
1.89
"Bortezomib is a cornerstone in the management of multiple myeloma. "( Resource implications of bortezomib therapy in a large UK cohort: An evaluation study.
Djebbari, F; Kothari, J; Panitsas, F; Peniket, A; Ramasamy, K; Sultanova, M; Tatarczuch, M; Vallance, G, 2019
)
2.26
"Bortezomib is a first proteasome inhibitor drug, widely used in MM treatment."( XPO1 is a critical player for bortezomib resistance in multiple myeloma: A quantitative proteomic approach.
Chanukuppa, V; Chatterjee, T; Kumar, S; Paul, D; Rapole, S; Santra, MK; Sharma, S; Taunk, K, 2019
)
1.52
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a proteasome inhibitor used for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma treatment. "( Glycine-Poly-L-Lactic Acid Copolymeric Nanoparticles for the Efficient Delivery of Bortezomib.
Chaudhari, D; Gupta, U; Jain, S; Rajoria, S; Rani, S, 2019
)
2.18
"Bortezomib is a standard therapy in light-chain amyloidosis (AL), but little is known about response duration. "( A prospective observational study of 915 patients with systemic AL amyloidosis treated with upfront bortezomib.
Cohen, O; Foard, D; Fontana, M; Gillmore, JD; Hawkins, PN; Lachmann, HJ; Mahmood, S; Manwani, R; Quarta, C; Sachchithanantham, S; Sharpley, F; Wechalekar, AD; Whelan, C, 2019
)
2.17
"Bortezomib (Btz) is a proteasome inhibitor approved by the FDA to treat multiple myeloma. "( Targeting Bortezomib to Bone Increases Its Bone Anabolic Activity and Reduces Systemic Adverse Effects in Mice.
Boeckman, RK; Boyce, BF; Ebetino, FH; Lin, X; Srinivasan, V; Sun, W; Tao, J; Wang, H; Wu, T; Xing, L; Zhang, H, 2020
)
2.4
"Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a boronate peptide and first-in-class proteasome inhibitor serving an important role in degenerating several intracellular proteins. "( Enhancing the Therapeutic Efficacy of Bortezomib in Cancer Therapy Using Polymeric Nanostructures.
Jaafari, MR; Johnston, TP; Korani, M; Korani, S; Nikpoor, AR; Orafai, HM; Sahebkar, A; Zendehdel, E, 2019
)
2.23
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with activity in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia."( Treatment of children with relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia with mitoxantrone, vincristine, pegaspargase, dexamethasone, and bortezomib.
August, KJ; Gamis, AS; Guest, EM; Hays, JA; Lewing, K, 2020
)
1.48
"Bortezomib is a selective and reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome, which is used to treat oncologic and rare autoimmune disorders in pediatric patients. "( Bortezomib-Responsive Refractory Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis.
Buratti, S; Castagnola, E; Cordani, R; Fioredda, F; Franciotta, D; Gastaldi, M; Giacomini, T; Lanteri, P; Mancardi, MM; Micalizzi, C; Morana, G; Pirlo, D; Renna, S; Risso, M; Vari, MS, 2020
)
3.44
"Bortezomib is a highly efficacious proteasome inhibitor widely used to treat multiple myeloma and light chain (AL) amyloidosis patients."( Cytomegalovirus reactivation after bortezomib treatment for multiple myeloma and light chain amyloidosis.
De-Silva, D; Garcia Mingo, A; Griffiths, PD; Hughes, D; Kyriakou, C; Mahmood, S; Mehta, A; Ramsay, I; Sachchithanantham, S; Sharpley, FA; Wechalekar, AD; Worthington, S, 2020
)
1.56
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is an FDA approved proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma. "( The Effect of Phase Transition Temperature on Therapeutic Efficacy of Liposomal Bortezomib.
Attar, H; Ghaffari, S; Jaafari, MR; Korani, M; Mashreghi, M; Nikoofal-Sahlabadi, S; Nikpoor, AR, 2020
)
2.23
"Bortezomib (Velcade®) is a reversible proteasome inhibitor that shows potent antineoplastic activity, by inhibiting the constitutively increased proteasome activity in myeloma cells, and is approved as a first-line therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). "( Population-based meta-analysis of bortezomib exposure-response relationships in multiple myeloma patients.
Mager, DE; Zhang, L, 2020
)
2.28
"Bortezomib is an anti-tumor agent, which inhibits 26S proteasome degrading ubiquitinated proteins. "( Molecular Mechanisms of Bortezomib Action: Novel Evidence for the miRNA-mRNA Interaction Involvement.
Machaliński, B; Paczkowska, E; Rogińska, D; Schmidt, CA; Ulańczyk, Z; Łuczkowska, K, 2020
)
2.31
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) that is used for the treatment of a variety of cancers."( Utilization of Lipid-based Nanoparticles to Improve the Therapeutic Benefits of Bortezomib.
Jaafari, MR; Korani, M; Korani, S; Sahebkar, A; Sathyapalan, T; Zendehdel, E, 2020
)
1.51
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor used in the treatment of multiple myeloma, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, mantle cell lymphoma. "( Bortezomib-induced motor neuropathy: A case report.
Mulay, S; Singh, M; Thomas, VM, 2020
)
3.44
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a proteasome inhibitor as approved by US FDA for the treatment of multiple myeloma. "( Biotinylated HPMA centered polymeric nanoparticles for Bortezomib delivery.
Gupta, U; Nakhate, KT; Rani, S; Sahoo, RK, 2020
)
2.25
"Bortezomib is a boronic acid-based potent proteasome inhibitor that has been actively studied for its anti-tumour effects through inhibition of the proteasome."( Inhibition of PLK4 might enhance the anti-tumour effect of bortezomib on glioblastoma via PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway.
Cheng, R; Ji, H; Jia, G; Ma, J; Ren, D; Ren, J; Sun, Y; Tu, Y; Wang, C; Wang, J; Wang, L; Xu, C, 2020
)
1.52
"Bortezomib is a reversible proteasome inhibitor affects the ubiquitin-proteasome mechanism to kill cancer cells, and inhibition of the proteasome modulates the expression of multiple target genes at the transcriptional level. "( Regulation of Fas in response to bortezomib and epirubicin in colorectal cancer cells.
Cacan, E; Ozmen, ZC, 2020
)
2.28
"Bortezomib is a reversible inhibitor of proteasome proteins in mammalian cells. "( Bortezomib - First Therapeutic Proteasome Inhibitor for Cancer Therapy: A Review of Patent Literature.
Dharamsi, A; Patel, R; Vora, PA, 2020
)
3.44
"Bortezomib is a potent 20S proteasome inhibitor approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. "( A Translational Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Framework of Target-Mediated Disposition, Target Inhibition and Drug-Drug Interactions of Bortezomib.
Hanley, M; Iwasaki, S; Venkatakrishnan, K; Xia, C; Zhu, A, 2020
)
2.2
"Bortezomib (BOZ) is a proteasome inhibitor chemotherapeutic agent utilized to treat multiple myeloma and recently offered to cure melanoma. "( Alpha-lipoic acid alters the antitumor effect of bortezomib in melanoma cells in vitro.
Istenes, I; Kőhidai, L; Lajkó, E; Láng, O; Takács, A, 2020
)
2.26
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a proteasome inhibitor approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma."( Bortezomib-loaded lipidic-nano drug delivery systems; formulation, therapeutic efficacy, and pharmacokinetics.
Löbenberg, R; Mahmoudian, M; Valizadeh, H; Zakeri-Milani, P, 2021
)
2.79
"Bortezomib is a common multiple myeloma therapy that can cause treatment-related peripheral neuropathy, a risk factor for falls. "( Bortezomib in first-line therapy is associated with falls in older adults with multiple myeloma.
Fiala, MA; Schoenbeck, KL; Wildes, TM, 2021
)
3.51
"Bortezomib (BT) is a reversible inhibitor of proteasome which is used in the treatment of hematological cancers. "( Separation, identification and characterization of stress degradation products of bortezomib using HPLC and LC-MS.
Narayana Rao, K; Purushotham Reddy, C; Ramakrishna, K, 2021
)
2.29
"Bortezomib is a classical proteasome inhibitor and previous researches have reported its roles of anti-oxidation and anti-inflammatory functions in various diseases. "( Bortezomib alleviates myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury via enhancing of Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway.
He, S; Li, D; Lin, J; Liu, C; Liu, S; Wang, B; Yang, W; Zheng, Y; Zhou, J, 2021
)
3.51
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has a promising role in autoimmune conditions."( Bortezomib in anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate-Receptor (NMDA-R) encephalitis: A systematic review.
Bratina, A; Cheli, M; Dinoto, A; Manganotti, P; Sartori, A, 2021
)
2.79
"Bortezomib is a first-line chemotherapeutic drug widely used for multiple myeloma and other nonsolid malignancies. "( Activation of RAGE/STAT3 pathway by methylglyoxal contributes to spinal central sensitization and persistent pain induced by bortezomib.
Ding, HH; Lei, WL; Liu, CC; Liu, M; Ma, C; Ouyang, HD; Wei, JY; Wu, SL; Xie, MX; Xin, WJ, 2017
)
2.1
"Bortezomib (Bz) is a proteasome inhibitor that directly targets antibody-producing plasma cells. "( Bortezomib treatment induces a higher mortality rate in lupus model mice with a higher disease activity.
Fujii, H; Harigae, H; Ikeda, T; Ishii, T; Kamogawa, Y; Nose, M; Shirai, T; Shirota, Y, 2017
)
3.34
"Bortezomib (BZM) is a proteasome inhibitor used for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM)."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib attenuates renal fibrosis in mice via the suppression of TGF-β1.
Chiga, M; Isobe, K; Mandai, S; Mori, T; Nomura, N; Rai, T; Sohara, E; Uchida, S; Yui, N; Zeniya, M, 2017
)
1.48
"Bortezomib is a landmark drug in the therapeutic history of multiple myeloma as the first-generation proteasome inhibitor. "( Bortezomib-induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis in a patient with multiple myeloma: A case report and literature review
.
Chen, H; Lou, X; Peng, B, 2017
)
3.34
"Bortezomib is a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat several cancers; however, it exhibits severe side effects in testicular tissue. "( Protective effects of agomelatine on testicular damage caused by bortezomib.
Akaras, N; Atilay, H; Bal, T; Halici, MB; Selli, J, 2017
)
2.14
"Bortezomib, which is a potent proteasome inhibitor, has been used as a first-line drugs to treat multiple myeloma for a few decades, and radiotherapy has frequently been applied to manage acute bone lesions in the patients. "( The combination of ionizing radiation and proteasomal inhibition by bortezomib enhances the expression of NKG2D ligands in multiple myeloma cells.
Bae, J; Heo, W; Jeung, YH; Lee, YS; Nam, J, 2018
)
2.16
"Bortezomib (Btz) is an active agent used to treat multiple myeloma (MM). "( Low expression of neural cell adhesion molecule, CD56, is associated with low efficacy of bortezomib plus dexamethasone therapy in multiple myeloma.
Ashour, R; Iida, S; Ishida, T; Ito, A; Kinoshita, S; Komatsu, H; Kusumoto, S; Narita, T; Ri, M; Totani, H; Yoshida, T, 2018
)
2.14
"Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma after one prior therapy."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bortezomib.
Abdul-Majeed, S; Barta, SK; Cael, B; Tan, CRC, 2019
)
1.49
"Bortezomib (BORT) is an anti-tumour agent that inhibits proteasome, which is responsible for the degradation of many intracellular proteins. "( The protective effect of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib on the uterus of ovariectomized rats.
Bozkurt, M; Buyuk, B; Can, I; Can, S; Inaloz, SS; Karakas, B; Karamese, SA,
)
1.83
"Bortezomib is a mainstay of therapy for multiple myeloma, frequently complicated by painful neuropathy. "( Clinical, electrophysiological, and cutaneous innervation changes in patients with bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy reveal insight into mechanisms of neuropathic pain.
Bechakra, M; de Zeeuw, CI; Groeneveld, GJ; Jongen, JL; Nieuwenhoff, MD; Scheltens-de Boer, M; Sonneveld, P; van Doorn, PA; van Rosmalen, J,
)
1.8
"Bortezomib is a relatively new drug and there are only a few reports with respect to its psychiatric side effects."( [Mania Associated with the Use of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone].
Coşar, B; Geniş, B, 2018
)
1.48
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is an approved anticancer drug, classified as a selective reversible inhibitor of the ubiquitin-dependent proteasome system, that leads to cancer cell cycle arrest and apoptosis reducing the invasion ability of Osteosarcoma cells in vitro."( Bortezomib and endocannabinoid/endovanilloid system: a synergism in osteosarcoma.
Argenziano, M; Casale, F; Di Paola, A; Di Pinto, D; Pota, E; Punzo, F; Rossi, F; Tortora, C, 2018
)
2.64
"Bortezomib is a frequently used chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment of multiple myeloma and other nonsolid malignancies. "( Reduction of SIRT1 epigenetically upregulates NALP1 expression and contributes to neuropathic pain induced by chemotherapeutic drug bortezomib.
Chen, K; Fan, J; Liu, CC; Luo, ZF; Xin, WJ; Yang, Y, 2018
)
2.13
"Bortezomib is a boronate proteasome inhibitor widely used as an efficient anticancer drug; however, the clinical use of bortezomib is hampered by its adverse effects such as hematotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy, and low efficacy on solid tumors due to unfavorable pharmacokinetics and poor penetration in the solid tumors. "( A Targeted and pH-Responsive Bortezomib Nanomedicine in the Treatment of Metastatic Bone Tumors.
Cai, X; Li, L; Tong, L; Wang, C; Wang, M; Xiao, J; Yang, J, 2018
)
2.21
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that shows both anticancer and bone anabolic properties and is being evaluated for its positive effects in MM patients with skeletal complications."( Systems Modeling of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Combinatorial Effects on Bone Homeostasis in Multiple Myeloma Patients.
Mager, DE; Zhang, L, 2019
)
1.56
"Bortezomib is a dipeptidyl boronic acid that selectively inhibits the ubiquitin proteasome pathway, which plays a role in the degradation of many intracellular proteins. "( Bortezomib for the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies: 15 Years Later.
Robak, P; Robak, T, 2019
)
3.4
"Bortezomib is a selective and reversible proteasome inhibitor used for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM)."( Acute pancreatitis caused by bortezomib.
Akin, E; Akyol, P; Atalay, R; Buyukasik, NS; Demirezer Bolat, A; Dilek, I; Ersoy, O; Guney, T; Koseoglu, H; Solakoglu, T,
)
1.14
"Bortezomib is an important agent in multiple myeloma treatment, but resistance in cell lines and patients has been described. "( The interaction of bortezomib with multidrug transporters: implications for therapeutic applications in advanced multiple myeloma and other neoplasias.
Anderson, K; Clynes, M; Delmore, J; Jakubikova, J; Klippel, S; Meiller, J; Mitsiades, CS; O'Connor, R; O'Gorman, P; Ooi, MG; Richardson, P, 2013
)
2.16
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor active in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) cell lines, but poorly active in the clinic when used as a single agent, suggesting that the microenvironment could protect from drug efficacy. "( Bortezomib down-modulates the survival factor interferon regulatory factor 4 in Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines and decreases the protective activity of Hodgkin lymphoma-associated fibroblasts.
Aldinucci, D; Borghese, C; Carbone, A; Casagrande, N; Celegato, M; Colombatti, A, 2014
)
3.29
"Bortezomib is a highly selective and reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome. "( Effect of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and 5‑fluorouracil on 4T1 breast cancer cells.
Altıkat, S; Boyaci, I; Cavga, FZ; Irmak, R; Kocacan, SA; Yerlikaya, A, 2013
)
2.23
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor commonly indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma and non Hodgkin lymphoma. "( Bortezomib and heart failure: case-report and review of the French Pharmacovigilance database.
Carrie, D; Despas, F; Dumonteil, N; Galinier, M; Honton, B; Montastruc, JL; Pathak, A; Roussel, M; Rouvellat, C, 2014
)
3.29
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with high efficacy for multiple myeloma but with severe peripheral neurotoxicity, leading to dose modification and severe neurological disability. "( Bortezomib-induced neuropathy: axonal membrane depolarization precedes development of neuropathy.
Beppu, M; Fujimaki, Y; Isose, S; Iwai, Y; Kuwabara, S; Misawa, S; Mitsuma, S; Nakaseko, C; Nasu, S; Ohmori, S; Ohwada, C; Sekiguchi, Y; Shibuya, K; Shimizu, N; Takeda, Y, 2014
)
3.29
"Bortezomib is a reversible proteasome inhibitor used as an anticancer drug. "( Proteasome inhibition induces DNA damage and reorganizes nuclear architecture and protein synthesis machinery in sensory ganglion neurons.
Berciano, MT; Casafont, I; Lafarga, M; Palanca, A, 2014
)
1.85
"Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of all phases of multiple myeloma (MM) and it is also used for the treatment of [corrected] light-chain amyloidosis (AL). "( Bortezomib subcutaneous injection in combination regimens for myeloma or systemic light-chain amyloidosis: a retrospective chart review of response rates and toxicity in newly diagnosed patients.
Comenzo, R; Cossor, F; Fallo, S; Kaul, E; Klein, A; Miller, K; Shah, G; Smith, H; Sprague, K, 2013
)
3.28
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor used for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). "( Combination treatment with 2-methoxyestradiol overcomes bortezomib resistance of multiple myeloma cells.
Han, J; Heo, HJ; Jeong, SH; Jeong, YJ; Kim, HK; Kim, N; Ko, KS; Ko, TH; Lee, SR; Rhee, BD; Song, IS; Youm, JB, 2013
)
2.08
"Bortezomib is an important agent for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and has recently been reported as efficacious in the treatment of patients with POEMS syndrome."( Successful treatment of POEMS syndrome with bortezomib and dexamethasone, combined with radiotherapy, and followed by autologous stem cell transplantation.
Hagihara, M; Hattori, Y; Ishigatsubo, Y; Ishii, Y; Ishiyama, Y; Tomita, N; Yamamoto, E; Yamazaki, E, 2013
)
1.37
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor used as an antineoplastic drug, although its neurotoxicity frequently causes a severe sensory peripheral neuropathy."( Reactive nucleolar and Cajal body responses to proteasome inhibition in sensory ganglion neurons.
Berciano, MT; Casafont, I; Lafarga, M; Palanca, A, 2014
)
1.12
"Bortezomib is an anti-neoplastic drug acting against multiple myeloma but its use is associated with the onset of painful peripheral neuropathy. "( Antibody against tumor necrosis factor-α reduces bortezomib-induced allodynia in a rat model.
Canta, A; Carozzi, V; Cavaletti, G; Chiorazzi, A; Meregalli, C; Monbaliu, J; Oggioni, N; Sala, B; VAN DE Velde, H, 2013
)
2.09
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with remarkable clinical antitumor activity in multiple myeloma (MM) and is under evaluation in clinical trials in various types of cancer including breast cancer. "( IKKβ inhibitor in combination with bortezomib induces cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells.
Anderson, KC; Hide, M; Hideshima, H; Hideshima, T; Ikeda, H; Iwasaki, A; Yoshida, Y, 2014
)
2.12
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a frequently used chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment of refractory multiple myeloma and hematological neoplasms. "( TNF-α-mediated JNK activation in the dorsal root ganglion neurons contributes to Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Cui, Y; Huang, ZZ; Li, D; Liu, XG; Pang, RP; Su, YM; Wei, JY; Xin, WJ; Xue, Z; Zhang, J, 2014
)
2.07
"Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor that has promising antitumor activity against various cancer cells. "( Inhibition of autophagy by autophagic inhibitors enhances apoptosis induced by bortezomib in non-small cell lung cancer cells.
Ji, Z; Jiang, X; Lei, Y; Li, H; Sun, M; Wu, G, 2014
)
2.07
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor currently studied in clinical trials of childhood cancers. "( Protective role of humanin on bortezomib-induced bone growth impairment in anticancer treatment.
Eksborg, S; Eriksson, E; Johnsen, JI; Kogner, P; Perup, LS; Sävendahl, L; Wickström, M, 2014
)
2.13
"Bortezomib (BZB) is a chemotherapeutic agent approved for treating multiple myeloma (MM) patients. "( Bortezomib enhances the osteogenic differentiation capacity of human mesenchymal stromal cells derived from bone marrow and placental tissues.
Issaragrisil, S; Kheolamai, P; Klincumhom, N; Manochantr, S; Sanvoranart, T; Supokawej, A; U-Pratya, Y; Wattanapanitch, M, 2014
)
3.29
"Bortezomib is a potent proteasome inhibitor that has been extensively used to treat multiple myeloma. "( Bortezomib induces thrombocytopenia by the inhibition of proplatelet formation of megakaryocytes.
Fujishima, Y; Ishida, Y; Ito, S; Kowata, S; Murai, K; Shimoyama, T; Yashima-Abo, A, 2014
)
3.29
"Bortezomib is an FDA-approved proteasome inhibitor, and oncolytic herpes simplex virus-1 (oHSV) is a promising therapeutic approach for cancer. "( Bortezomib-induced unfolded protein response increases oncolytic HSV-1 replication resulting in synergistic antitumor effects.
Bailey, Z; Bolyard, C; Caligiuri, MA; Cripe, TP; Eaves, D; He, S; Hurwitz, BS; Kaur, B; Old, M; Parris, DS; Rath, KS; Selvendiran, K; Yoo, JY; Yu, J; Yu, JG; Zhang, J, 2014
)
3.29
"Bortezomib is an active agent in AL amyloidosis and responses to this drug in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone are both rapid and deep. "( Efficacy of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in treatment-naïve patients with high-risk cardiac AL amyloidosis (Mayo Clinic stage III).
Bridoux, F; Comenzo, RL; Decaux, O; Gillmore, J; Hari, P; Hawkins, PN; Jaccard, A; Lavergne, D; Lazaro, E; Macro, M; Mercie, P; Mohty, D; Morel, P; Pellegrin, JL; Roussel, M; Venner, CP; Wechalekar, AD, 2014
)
2.22
"Bortezomib is a chemotherapeutic agent that acts via proteasome inhibition resulting in cellular apoptosis and inhibition of angiogenesis. "( Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome resulting from repeat bortezomib usage.
Nixon, NA; Parhar, K, 2014
)
2.08
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has shown important clinical efficacy either as a single agent or in combination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). "( Bendamustine and prednisone in combination with bortezomib (BPV) in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed/untreated multiple myeloma.
Andrea, M; Becker, C; Behre, G; Bourgeois, M; Edelmann, T; Gutsche, K; Hammerschmidt, D; Hennig, E; Heyn, S; Hoffmann, FA; Holzvogt, B; Kaiser, T; Krahl, R; Kreibich, U; Lindner, T; Niederwieser, D; Plötze, M; Pönisch, W; Reifenrath, K; Remane, Y; Schliwa, T; Schwarz, M; Schwarzer, A; Vucinic, V; Winkelmann, C; Zehrfeld, T, 2014
)
2.1
"Bortezomib is a first generation proteasome inhibitor that is the frontline chemotherapy for multiple myeloma with the chief dose-limiting side effect of painful peripheral neuropathy. "( Altered discharges of spinal neurons parallel the behavioral phenotype shown by rats with bortezomib related chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy.
Dougherty, PM; Robinson, CR; Zhang, H, 2014
)
2.07
"Bortezomib is a potent inhibitor of proteasomes currently used to eliminate malignant plasma cells in multiple myeloma patients. "( Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib depletes plasma cells and specific autoantibody production in primary thymic cell cultures from early-onset myasthenia gravis patients.
Buurman, WA; De Baets, MH; Duimel, H; Gomez, AM; Hummel, J; Losen, M; Martinez-Martinez, P; Molenaar, PC; Nogales-Gadea, G; Saxena, A; Verheyen, F; Vrolix, K; Willcox, N, 2014
)
2.14
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor approved by the FDA for treatment of multiple myeloma and mantel cell lymphoma."( Bortezomib prevents the expression of MMP-13 and the degradation of collagen type 2 in human chondrocytes.
Chen, A; Guo, F; Hu, W; Li, F; Zhang, W, 2014
)
2.57
"Bortezomib (Velcade) is a potent and reversible PI that has been used successfully in the treatment of patients with MM."( Current advances in novel proteasome inhibitor-based approaches to the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Boise, LH; Lonial, S, 2011
)
1.09
"Bortezomib is an U.S."( Bortezomib reduces pre-existing antibodies to recombinant immunotoxins in mice.
Manning, ML; Mason-Osann, E; Onda, M; Pastan, I, 2015
)
2.58
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor used for hematologic cancer treatment. "( Proteasome inhibitor bortezomib suppresses nuclear factor-kappa B activation and ameliorates eye inflammation in experimental autoimmune uveitis.
Chen, SH; Hsu, SM; Lin, CJ; Shen, FH; Shieh, CC; Yang, CH, 2015
)
2.18
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor which has demonstrated activity against recurrent or newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and mantle cell lymphoma. "( Meta-analysis of incidence and risk of peripheral neuropathy associated with intravenous bortezomib.
Peng, L; Ye, X; Zhang, J; Zhao, Q; Zhou, Y, 2015
)
2.08
"Bortezomib is a selective inhibitor of the proteosoma that is used in multiple myeloma. "( [Retrospective study comparing low-dose versus standard dose of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma].
Befferman Cordova, N; Espinoza Zelada, M; Galleguillos M, M; Ocqueteau Tachini, M; Ramírez Villanueva, P; Sarmiento Maldonado, M, 2015
)
2.1
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that is largely employed as a first-line treatment for multiple myeloma."( Bortezomib in type I cryoglobulinemic vasculitis: are we acting too late?
Campochiaro, C; D'Aliberti, T; Marcatti, M; Pagliula, G; Praderio, L; Ramirez, GA; Salmaggi, C; Tresoldi, M, 2015
)
2.58
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that is frequently used for multiple myeloma and lymphoma. "( Bortezomib-associated demyelinating neuropathy--clinical and pathologic features.
Brannagan, TH; De Sousa, EA; Tanji, K; Thawani, SP; Weimer, LH, 2015
)
3.3
"Bortezomib (Velcade(®)) is a proteasome inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). "( Bortezomib: A Review in Mantle Cell Lymphoma in Previously Untreated Patients Unsuitable for Stem-Cell Transplantation.
McCormack, PL, 2015
)
3.3
"Bortezomib is a commonly used first-line agent in MM treatment; however, knowledge of the signal transduction pathways regulating bortezomib-mediated cell cytotoxicity is incomplete."( Logic-Based and Cellular Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Bortezomib Responses in U266 Human Myeloma Cells.
Abernethy, DR; Chudasama, VL; Mager, DE; Ovacik, MA, 2015
)
1.39
"Bortezomib is an inhibitor of the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway responsible for intracellular protein turnover. "( Modulatory effects of bortezomib on host immune cell functions.
Dudimah, DF; Pellom, ST; Sayers, TJ; Shanker, A; Thounaojam, MC, 2015
)
2.17
"Bortezomib is a reversible proteasome inhibitor with potent antineoplastic activity that exhibits dose- and time-dependent pharmacokinetics (PK). "( Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of target-mediated drug disposition of bortezomib in mice.
Mager, DE; Zhang, L, 2015
)
2.08
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that can eliminate plasma cells and has demonstrated utility in the treatment of ABMR."( Bortezomib for refractory acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A single-centre case series.
Campistol, JM; Cid, J; Cofan, F; De Sousa-Amorim, E; Diekmann, F; Lozano, M; Oppenheimer, F; Palou, E; Revuelta, I; Sole, M, 2016
)
2.6
"Bortezomib appears to be a promising early desensitizing agent in the world of kidney transplantation and high short-term success rates have been observed. "( Bortezomib in kidney transplantation.
Meouchy, J; Qazi, Y; Shah, N, 2015
)
3.3
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a frequently used chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment of refractory multiple myeloma and hematological neoplasms. "( Upregulation of CCL2 via ATF3/c-Jun interaction mediated the Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Huang, Z; Liu, C; Luan, S; Ma, C; OuYang, H; Wei, J; Wu, S; Xin, W, 2016
)
2.12
"Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor in myeloma. "( Bortezomib in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary care center in India.
Digumarti, R; Gundeti, S; Linga, VG; Pragnya, C; Thota, NK,
)
3.02
"Bortezomib is a selective reversible proteasome inhibitor with proapoptotic effects. "( A phase II, open-label trial of bortezomib (VELCADE(®)) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Agelaki, S; Filippa, G; Georgoulias, V; Kentepozidis, N; Kontopodis, E; Kotsakis, A; Mala, A; Mavroudis, D; Moutsos, M; Syrigos, K; Vamvakas, L; Ziras, N, 2016
)
2.16
"Bortezomib is an anti-cancer agent that induces ER stress by inhibiting proteasomal degradation. "( Bortezomib attenuates palmitic acid-induced ER stress, inflammation and insulin resistance in myotubes via AMPK dependent mechanism.
Bae, YA; Cheon, HG; Choi, HE; Jang, J; Kwak, HJ; Park, SK, 2016
)
3.32
"Bortezomib is a safe and well-tolerated therapy for patients with AL amyloidosis with a rapid hematologic response and cardiac response, as assessed by the NT-proBNP level."( Bortezomib-Containing Regimens for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Amyloid Light Chain Amyloidosis: A Single-Center Experience.
Bahlis, NJ; Duggan, P; Jimenez-Zepeda, VH; Neri, P, 2016
)
3.32
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with a remarkable antitumor activity, used in the clinic as first line treatment for multiple myeloma. "( Inhibition of the neuronal NFκB pathway attenuates bortezomib-induced neuropathy in a mouse model.
Alé, A; Bruna, J; Calls, A; Haralambous, S; Karamita, M; Navarro, X; Probert, L; Udina, E, 2016
)
2.13
"Bortezomib is a powerful proteasome inhibitor used in the treatment of hematological malignancies."( The combined effects of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib with topoisomerase I and II inhibitors on topoisomerase enzymes.
Kerimoğlu, B; Öksüzoğlu, E; Tırınoğlu, Ç, 2016
)
1.42
"Bortezomib is a modified dipeptidyl boronic acid that disrupts essential intracellular pathways by inhibiting proteasomes. "( Bortezomib: a novel chemotherapeutic agent for hematologic malignancies.
Kolesar, J; Utecht, KN, 2008
)
3.23
"Bortezomib is a boron-containing molecule, which reversibly inhibits the proteasome, an intracellular organelle, which is central to the breakdown of ubiquitinated proteins and consequently crucial for normal cellular homeostasis."( Acute severe cardiac failure in a myeloma patient due to proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.
Gonullu, E; Hacihanefioglu, A; Tarkun, P, 2008
)
1.3
"Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor with remarkable antitumor activity that is approved for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. "( Features and risk factors of peripheral neuropathy during treatment with bortezomib for advanced multiple myeloma.
Auran-Schleinitz, T; Blaise, D; Bouabdallah, R; Coso, D; de Collela, JM; de Lavallade, H; El-Cheikh, J; Gastaut, JA; Mohty, M; Stoppa, AM, 2008
)
2.02
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor whose anticancer action is partly mediated through inhibition of NF-kappaB."( Dynamic effect of bortezomib on nuclear factor-kappaB activity and gene expression in tumor cells.
Bagain, L; Chen, Z; Hager, GL; Karpova, T; McNally, JG; Silvin, C; Sung, MH; Van Waes, C; Voss, TC; Yang, X, 2008
)
1.4
"Bortezomib proved to be a more potent inductor of apoptosis than gefitinib and alkylating agents."( Cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of bortezomib and gefitinib compared to alkylating agents on human glioblastoma cells.
Cambar, J; De Giorgi, F; Ichas, F; L'Azou, B; Passagne, I; Pédeboscq, S; Pometan, JP, 2008
)
1.34
"Bortezomib is an inhibitor of proteasome, a multicatalytic enzyme complex that degrades several intracellular proteins."( An EORTC phase I study of Bortezomib in combination with oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Anthoney, A; Bauer, J; Caponigro, F; Govaerts, AS; Lacombe, D; Marréaud, S; Milano, A; Twelves, C, 2009
)
1.37
"Bortezomib is a new chemotherapeutic drug available for the treatment of lymphoid disorders, including multiple myeloma. "( Immune-mediated neuropathies in myeloma patients treated with bortezomib.
Alfonsi, E; Corso, A; Costa, A; Lazzarino, M; Lozza, A; Mangiacavalli, S; Moglia, A; Piccolo, G; Ravaglia, S; Varettoni, M; Zappasodi, P, 2008
)
2.03
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has shown activity in vitro and in vivo in prostate cancer. "( Bortezomib-mediated inhibition of steroid receptor coactivator-3 degradation leads to activated Akt.
Ayala, G; Ding, Y; Frolov, A; Harper, JW; Hayes, TG; Ittmann, MM; Kadmon, D; Li, R; Lynch, RG; MacDonnell, V; Miles, BJ; Mims, MP; Thompson, TC; Tsai, MJ; Wheeler, TM; Yan, J, 2008
)
3.23
"Bortezomib is a small-molecule proteasome inhibitor with single-agent activity in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and synergy with gemcitabine in preclinical studies. "( Bortezomib plus gemcitabine/carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II Southwest Oncology Group Study (S0339).
Albain, KS; Chansky, K; Crowley, J; Davies, AM; Gandara, DR; Gumerlock, PH; Lara, PN; Vogel, SJ, 2009
)
3.24
"Bortezomib is a first in class proteosomal inhibitor, that is Food and Drug Administration approved, for the treatment of plasma cell-derived tumors that is multiple myeloma."( Bortezomib provides effective therapy for antibody- and cell-mediated acute rejection.
Alloway, RR; Arend, LJ; Brailey, P; Cardi, M; Everly, JJ; Everly, MJ; Govil, A; Mogilishetty, G; Rike, AH; Roy-Chaudhury, P; Susskind, B; Tevar, A; Wadih, G; Woodle, ES, 2008
)
2.51
"Bortezomib (BZM) is a proteasome inhibitor in clinical use for multiple myeloma."( Green tea polyphenols block the anticancer effects of bortezomib and other boronic acid-based proteasome inhibitors.
Cadenas, E; Chen, TC; Gaffney, KJ; Golden, EB; Kardosh, A; Lam, PY; Louie, SG; Petasis, NA; Schönthal, AH, 2009
)
1.32
"Bortezomib is a selective and potent inhibitor of the proteasome and has prominent effects in vitro and in vivo against tumors. "( Proteasome inhibition induces apoptosis in primary human natural killer cells and suppresses NKp46-mediated cytotoxicity.
Fadeel, B; Feng, X; Henter, JI; Ji, C; Nordenskjöld, M; Ottosson, A; Wang, X; Zheng, C, 2009
)
1.8
"Bortezomib is a new and effective agent for refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma."( [Development of an extramedullary plasmacytoma despite disappearing M protein in multiple myeloma by bortezomib treatment].
Handa, H; Karasawa, M; Koiso, H; Mawatari, M; Murakami, H; Nojima, Y; Osaki, Y; Saitoh, T; Sekigami, T; Tahara, K; Tsukamoto, N; Uchiumi, H; Yokohama, A, 2009
)
1.29
"Bortezomib proved to be a rapid (<24 hour) and potent inhibitor of the release of several NFkappaB-inducible cytokines (including TNF-alpha, IL-1Beta, IL-6 and IL-10) by activated T-cells from healthy volunteers and RA patients, regardless of their clinical responsiveness to methotrexate. "( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib inhibits the release of NFkappaB-inducible cytokines and induces apoptosis of activated T cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Dijkmans, BA; Jansen, G; Lems, WF; Oerlemans, R; Scheper, RJ; van der Heijden, JW,
)
1.88
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that induces apoptosis in primary Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) cells and WM cell lines. "( Bortezomib in relapsed or refractory Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.
Chen, C; Eisenhauer, E; Kouroukis, CT; Powers, J; Stadtmauer, E; Stewart, AK; Voralia, M; Walsh, W; White, D; Wright, JJ, 2009
)
3.24
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that can synergize with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) to induce apoptosis in melanoma cells in vitro and inhibit tumor growth in vivo. "( Bortezomib pre-treatment prolongs interferon-alpha-induced STAT1 phosphorylation in melanoma cells.
Benninger, K; Carson, WE; Kreiner, M; Lesinski, GB; Quimper, M; Young, G, 2009
)
3.24
"Bortezomib is a selective and potent inhibitor of the 26S proteasome and is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma."( The role of ATF4 stabilization and autophagy in resistance of breast cancer cells treated with Bortezomib.
Bottini, A; Generali, D; Harris, AL; Mellor, HR; Milani, M; Pike, L; Rzymski, T, 2009
)
1.29
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with remarkable preclinical and clinical antitumor activity in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. "( Bortezomib induces canonical nuclear factor-kappaB activation in multiple myeloma cells.
Anderson, KC; Carrasco, RD; Chauhan, D; Hideshima, T; Ikeda, H; Mitsiades, C; Munshi, NC; Okawa, Y; Podar, K; Raje, N; Richardson, PG, 2009
)
3.24
"Bortezomib (VELCADE) is a proteasome inhibitor that not only targets the myeloma cell, but also acts in the bone marrow micro-environment, inhibiting the binding of myeloma cells to bone marrow stromal cells, as well as demonstrating anabolic effects on bone. "( Bortezomib: a review of its use in patients with multiple myeloma.
Curran, MP; McKeage, K, 2009
)
3.24
"Bortezomib (Velcade) is a proteasome inhibitor used in the treatment of myeloma and other blood dyscrasias. "( [Bortezomib-induced eruption: Sweet syndrome? Two case reports].
Billet, A; Chaby, G; Chatelain, D; Christophe, O; Dadban, A; Damaj, G; Lenglet, A; Lok, C; Marolleau, JP; Royer, R; Thuillier, D; Vaida, I; Viseux, V, 2009
)
2.71
"Bortezomib (Velcade) is a proteasome used in the treatment of myeloma. "( [Bortezomib-induced neutrophilic dermatosis with CD30+ lymphocytic infiltration].
Andreoli, A; Briere, J; Cavelier Balloy, B; Petit, A; Thomas, M, 2009
)
2.71
"Bortezomib is a well-established treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). "( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib aggravates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Eller, K; Heininger, D; Huber, JM; Mayer, G; Rosenkranz, AR; Tagwerker, A, 2009
)
2.1
"Bortezomib is a therapeutic proteasome inhibitor with antimyeloma activity and polyphenols are well known compounds that exert antiproliferative effects against tumuors. "( Natural polyphenols antagonize the antimyeloma activity of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib by direct chemical interaction.
Cheong, JW; Jeong, TS; Kim, HJ; Kim, TY; Lee, DS; Lee, JH; Min, HJ; Oh, B; Park, J; Park, SB; Suh, C; Yoon, SS, 2009
)
2.02
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor and enhances TNF-alpha-induced cell death."( Combination effect between bortezomib and tumor necrosis factor alpha on gefitinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cell lines.
Adachii, M; Ando, K; Hirose, T; Hosaka, T; Inoue, F; Ishida, H; Kadofuku, T; Kanome, T; Kusumoto, S; Ohmori, T; Ohnishi, T; Okuda, K; Saijo, N; Shirai, T; Sugiyama, T; Yamaoka, T, 2009
)
1.37
"Bortezomib is a potent, selective proteasome inhibitor. "( Bortezomib-induced perivascular dermatitis in a patient with multiple myeloma.
Aki, SZ; Erdem, O; Ozkurt, ZN; Sucak, GT; Yağci, M, 2009
)
3.24
"Bortezomib is a first in a class proteasome inhibitor that has been shown to effectively treat antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients."( Proteasome inhibition for antibody-mediated rejection.
Alloway, RR; Everly, JJ; Walsh, RC; Woodle, ES, 2009
)
1.07
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor showing strong antitumor activity against many tumors, primarily multiple myeloma. "( Bortezomib-induced painful neuropathy in rats: a behavioral, neurophysiological and pathological study in rats.
Avezza, F; Canta, A; Carozzi, VA; Cavaletti, G; Ceresa, C; Chiorazzi, A; Crippa, L; Gilardini, A; Marmiroli, P; Meregalli, C; Oggioni, N, 2010
)
3.25
"Bortezomib is a viable therapy to treat donor-specific HLA antibody in allograft recipients."( Elimination of post-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies with bortezomib.
Dave, SD; Everly, MJ; Feroz, A; Idica, A; Kaneku, H; Khemchandani, SI; Modi, PR; Shankar, V; Terasaki, PI; Trivedi, HL; Trivedi, VB; Vanikar, AV, 2008
)
1.3
"Bortezomib is a promising novel immunomodulatory agent in allogeneic transplantation."( Bortezomib, tacrolimus, and methotrexate for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation from HLA-mismatched unrelated donors.
Alyea, EP; Antin, JH; Armand, P; Cutler, C; Garcia, M; Ho, VT; Kim, HT; Koreth, J; Ritz, J; Soiffer, RJ; Stevenson, KE, 2009
)
2.52
"Bortezomib is a new agent for the treatment of patients with myeloma, with high response rates and controllable side effects."( Bortezomib and dexamethasone therapy for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma complicated by renal impairment.
Duan, MH; Jiao, L; Li, J; Shen, T; Zhang, W; Zhao, YQ; Zhou, DB, 2009
)
2.52
"Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor whose pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters are poorly understood in terms of their relationship with efficacy."( The relationship among tumor architecture, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of bortezomib in mouse xenograft models.
Babcock, T; Bannerman, B; Cao, Y; Hatsis, P; Kupperman, E; Robertson, R; Silva, MD; Terkelsen, J; Williamson, MJ; Xia, C; Yu, L, 2009
)
1.29
"Bortezomib is a potent proteasome inhibitor currently used to treat various malignancies with promising results. "( Bortezomib suppresses focal adhesion kinase expression via interrupting nuclear factor-kappa B.
Chang, CC; Chang, TC; Chen, CH; Golubovskaya, VM; Hsu, C; Ko, BS; Kuo, CC; Liou, JY; Liu, CC; Shen, TL; Shen, YC; Shyue, SK, 2010
)
3.25
"Bortezomib is a new addition to drugs used in MM and has shown good efficacy and safety profiles."( Rapid improvement in renal function in patients with multiple myeloma and renal failure treated with bortezomib.
Al Diab, AR; Al Momen, AK; Aleem, A; Niaz, F; Qayum, A, 2010
)
1.3
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor. "( Bortezomib: a new pro-apoptotic agent in cancer treatment.
Adamo, V; Bronte, G; Cicero, G; Fulfaro, F; Gebbia, N; Rizzo, S; Russo, A, 2010
)
3.25
"Bortezomib (Velcade) is a proteasome inhibitor that has been approved for patients with multiple myeloma."( Optimized combination therapy using bortezomib, TRAIL and TLR agonists in established breast tumors.
Celis, E; Lee, S; Sayers, TJ; Yagita, H, 2010
)
1.36
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has shown impressive efficacy for the treatment of multiple myeloma."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib inhibits T cell-dependent inflammatory responses.
Hara, T; Muroi, E; Ogawa, F; Sato, S; Shimizu, K; Yanaba, K; Yoshizaki, A, 2010
)
1.39
"Bortezomib (BTZ) is a proteasome inhibitor approved in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). "( Neurological monitoring reduces the incidence of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients.
Bruna, J; Clapés, V; Navarro, X; Petit, J; Velasco, R; Verdú, E, 2010
)
2.06
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor approved for anticancer therapy. "( G(alpha)12/13 inhibition enhances the anticancer effect of bortezomib through PSMB5 downregulation.
Dhanasekaran, DN; Ha, JH; Jayaraman, M; Kim, SG; Kwak, MK; Lee, CH; Lee, S; Nam, CW; Yang, YM, 2010
)
2.05
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has shown some activity in patients with T-cell lymphoma."( Pralatrexate is synergistic with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in in vitro and in vivo models of T-cell lymphoid malignancies.
Marchi, E; O'Connor, OA; Paoluzzi, L; Scotto, L; Seshan, VE; Zain, JM; Zinzani, PL, 2010
)
1.33
"Bortezomib is a potent inducer of apoptosis in malignant as well as non-malignant human plasma cells. "( Bortezomib affects the function of human B cells: possible implications for desensitization protocols.
Claas, FH; Doxiadis, II; Heidt, S; Mulder, A; Roelen, DL; Vergunst, M, 2009
)
3.24
"Bortezomib is an effective agent for treating multiple myeloma (MM). "( Bortezomib-resistant myeloma cell lines: a role for mutated PSMB5 in preventing the accumulation of unfolded proteins and fatal ER stress.
Iida, S; Inagaki, A; Ishida, T; Ito, A; Komatsu, H; Kusumoto, S; Miyazaki, H; Mori, F; Nakashima, T; Ri, M; Shiotsu, Y; Ueda, R, 2010
)
3.25
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with in vitro synergy with corticosteroids and clinical activity in human lymphoid malignancies."( Phase I study of bortezomib combined with chemotherapy in children with relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): a report from the therapeutic advances in childhood leukemia (TACL) consortium.
Bostrom, BC; Dubois, S; Eckroth, E; Gaynon, P; Glade-Bender, J; Hutchinson, R; Messinger, Y; Raetz, E; Sposto, R; van der Giessen, J, 2010
)
1.42
"Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor, which has shown high antimyeloma activity. "( Bortezomib and dexamethasone for Japanese patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a single center experience.
Chou, T; Hirose, T; Igarashi, N; Imai, Y; Ishiguro, T, 2010
)
3.25
"Bortezomib is a modified dipeptidyl boronic acid analogue used to treat multiple myeloma, mantle cell lymphoma, and, more recently, renal transplantation graft rejection."( Stability of unused reconstituted bortezomib in original manufacturer vials.
Kolesar, JM; Pomplun, ML; Vanderloo, JP; Vermeulen, LC, 2011
)
1.37
"Bortezomib is an inhibitor of 26S proteasome, which is an effective treatment for multiple myeloma. "( Complete atrioventricular block secondary to bortezomib use in multiple myeloma.
Jeon, SH; Kim, DH; Kwan, J; Lee, WS; Park, KS; Park, SD; Shin, SH; Woo, SI; Yi, HG, 2011
)
2.07
"Bortezomib is a potent agent for multiple myeloma (MM); however, severe treatment-related toxicities such as peripheral neuropathy have been observed in conjunction with its use. "( Successful treatment with a modified bortezomib schedule of weekly and longer intervals for patients with refractory/resistance multiple myeloma.
Hanzawa, K; Kizaki, M; Mori, S; Nemoto, T; Sagawa, M; Tokuhira, M; Tomikawa, T; Watanabe, R, 2011
)
2.08
"Bortezomib is a new chemotherapeutic agent approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. "( Somatic and autonomic small fiber neuropathy induced by bortezomib therapy: an immunofluorescence study.
Borsini, W; Di Stasi, V; Donadio, V; Giannoccaro, MP; Gomis Pèrez, C; Liguori, R, 2011
)
2.06
"Bortezomib (Velcade®) is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor and has been approved for first-line treatment of multiple myeloma and second-line treatment of mantle cell lymphoma."( The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and the mechanism of action of bortezomib.
Cvek, B; Dvorak, Z, 2011
)
1.33
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor demonstrating substantial activity in multiple myeloma. "( Inflammatory autoimmune neuropathy, presumably induced by bortezomib, in a patient suffering from multiple myeloma.
Fingerle-Rowson, G; Goldschmidt, H; Ho, AD; Neben, K; Pham, M; Schmitt, S; Storch-Hagenlocher, B, 2011
)
2.06
"Bortezomib (Velcade) is a proteasome inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of multiple myeloma."( Bortezomib as an adjuvant to conventional therapy in the treatment of antibody mediated rejection (AMR): the full spectrum.
Al Meshari, K; Altalhi, M; Alzayer, F; Elgamal, H; Pall, A, 2010
)
2.52
"Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor that was originally Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. "( Proteasome inhibitor treatment of antibody-mediated allograft rejection.
Alloway, RR; Girnita, A; Woodle, ES, 2011
)
1.81
"Bortezomib is a potential novel molecular targeting drug for the treatment of unresectable advanced gastric cancer."( Anti-tumor activity of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in gastric cancer.
Hayakawa, Y; Hirata, Y; Kinoshita, H; Koike, K; Maeda, S; Nakagawa, H; Nakata, W; Sakamoto, K; Takahashi, R, 2011
)
1.35
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that is currently approved for use in multiple myeloma (MM) and mantle-cell lymphoma."( Pilot study of bortezomib for patients with imatinib-refractory chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase.
Borthakur, G; Cortes, J; Faderl, S; Ferrajoli, A; Kantarjian, H; McConkey, D; O'Brien, S; Santos, FP; Wright, J, 2011
)
1.44
"Bortezomib (Velcade®) is a proteasome inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. "( Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of bortezomib in various in vivo models.
Cheung, PH; Foreman, O; Hain, HS; Kaur, P; Kavirayani, A; Saha, S; Tung, D, 2011
)
2.07
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor important to the therapy of multiple myeloma (MM), though a number of patients show resistance to this drug. "( Bortezomib resistance in a myeloma cell line is associated to PSMβ5 overexpression and polyploidy.
Balsas, P; Galán-Malo, P; Marzo, I; Naval, J, 2012
)
3.26
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that induces apoptosis in various cancer cells and has been shown to be effective as a salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma."( Cyclin kinase subunit 1B nuclear expression predicts an adverse outcome for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib.
Chang, H; Chen, MH; Qi, C; Reece, D, 2012
)
1.3
"Bortezomib, is a highly selective proteasome inhibitor with anti-NHL activity; it is currently FDA approved for second-line treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)."( The HB22.7 Anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody enhances bortezomib-mediated lymphomacidal activity in a sequence dependent manner.
Churchill, E; Ma, Y; Mahaffey, CM; Martin, SM; McKnight, H; O'Donnell, RT; Tuscano, JM, 2011
)
1.34
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that blocks the NF-κB pathway."( A phase II study of the combination of endocrine treatment and bortezomib in patients with endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer.
De Mesmaeker, P; Deleu, I; Dirix, LY; Prové, A; Rasschaert, M; Sas, L; Tjalma, WA; Trinh, XB; Van Dam, PA; Van de Velde, H; Van Laere, SJ; Vermeulen, PB; Vinken, P; Wojtasik, A, 2012
)
1.34
"Bortezomib is a promising potential therapy for acute leukemia, especially mdr1 drug-resistant leukemia."( Proteasome inhibitor bortezomib overcomes P-gp-mediated multidrug resistance in resistant leukemic cell lines.
Gong, Y; Shan, Q; Yang, X; Zheng, B; Zhou, R, 2012
)
2.14
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with minimal clinical activity as a monotherapy in solid tumours, but its combination with other targeted therapies is being actively investigated as a way to increase its anticarcinogenic properties. "( Indole-3-carbinol synergistically sensitises ovarian cancer cells to bortezomib treatment.
Agadjanian, H; Guo, X; Karlan, BY; Kwon, S; Miller, C; Nassanian, H; Orsulic, S; Taylor-Harding, B; Walsh, CS, 2012
)
2.06
"Bortezomib is a potent inhibitor of plasma cell production and it appears to be useful for the treatment of antibody-mediated graft dysfunction."( Lung transplantation across donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies: utility of bortezomib therapy in early graft dysfunction.
Chan, KM; Kamoun, M; Stuckey, LJ, 2012
)
1.32
"Bortezomib (Velcade™) is a reversible proteasome inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). "( Molecular mechanisms of bortezomib resistant adenocarcinoma cells.
Arastu-Kapur, S; Bennett, MK; Bergsagel, PL; Demo, S; Deu, E; Keats, J; Kirk, CJ; Suzuki, E, 2011
)
2.12
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with excellent antimyeloma activity. "( Bortezomib-associated fatal liver failure in a haemodialysis patient with multiple myeloma.
Beckers, EA; Cornelis, T; Driessen, AL; Koek, GH; van der Sande, FM, 2012
)
3.26
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has shown impressive efficacy in the treatment of multiple myeloma. "( Proteasome inhibitor bortezomib ameliorates intestinal injury in mice.
Asano, Y; Kadono, T; Sato, S; Sugaya, M; Tada, Y; Yanaba, K, 2012
)
2.14
"Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor initially approved for use in multiple myeloma and currently under continued investigation as a treatment for numerous subtypes of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. "( Bortezomib: a proteasome inhibitor with an evolving role in select subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Cheson, BD; Koprivnikar, JL, 2012
)
3.26
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has proven to be a very effective treatment for multiple myeloma. "( Bortezomib and bilateral herpes zoster.
Bergamo, S; di Meo, N; Dondas, A; Trevisan, G, 2012
)
3.26
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor and is active against multiple myeloma. "( Bortezomib-induced pneumonitis during bortezomib retreatment in multiple myeloma.
Itoh, K; Sasaki, M; Yamaguchi, T, 2012
)
3.26
"Bortezomib is a selective and reversible inhibitor of the proteasome."( Cytotoxic effects of bortezomib in myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia depend on autophagy-mediated lysosomal degradation of TRAF6 and repression of PSMA1.
Bolanos, L; Cloos, J; Cortelezzi, A; Cuzzola, M; Fang, J; Goyama, S; Jansen, G; Mulloy, JC; Oliva, EN; Rasch, C; Rhyasen, G; Rigolino, C; Starczynowski, DT; Varney, M; Wunderlich, M, 2012
)
1.42
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that inactivates NF-κB."( Phase II 2-arm trial of the proteasome inhibitor, PS-341 (bortezomib) in combination with irinotecan or PS-341 alone followed by the addition of irinotecan at time of progression in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of
Argiris, A; Arun, P; Feldman, LE; Forastiere, AA; Gilbert, J; Haigentz, M; Jang, M; Lee, JW; Van Waes, C, 2013
)
1.36
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma that inhibits tumor angiogenesis, a process that has been implicated in multiple myeloma pathogenesis."( Results from AMBER, a randomized phase 2 study of bevacizumab and bortezomib versus bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Bhaskar, B; Kassim, A; Paton, VE; Wamstad, K; White, D; Yi, J, 2013
)
1.35
"Bortezomib (BZ) is a proteasome inhibitor and interferes with degradation of misfolded proteins."( Synergistic effects of nelfinavir and bortezomib on proteotoxic death of NSCLC and multiple myeloma cells.
Dennis, PA; Gills, JJ; Hollander, MC; Kawabata, S; Lopiccolo, J; Mercado-Matos, JR; Wilson, W, 2012
)
1.37
"Bortezomib is a novel, first-in-class peptide which reversibly inhibits the proteasome and is Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, and systemic light chain amyloidosis, among others."( Severe heart failure after bortezomib treatment in a patient with multiple myeloma: a case report and review of the literature.
Bockorny, B; Bockorny, M; Bona, R; Chakravarty, S; Schulman, P, 2012
)
2.12
"Bortezomib appears to be an ideal target drug for HCC with LC."( Bortezomib induces tumor-specific cell death and growth inhibition in hepatocellular carcinoma and improves liver fibrosis.
Fujisawa, K; Hirose, Y; Matsumoto, T; Murata, Y; Saeki, I; Sakaida, I; Takami, T; Terai, S; Yamamoto, N; Yamasaki, T, 2013
)
3.28
"Bortezomib is a highly selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome and has been approved for clinical use in the treatment of relapsing and refractory multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. "( Requirement of apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 for bortezomib-induced apoptosis but not for Fas-mediated apoptosis in human leukemic cells.
Ceder, R; Fadeel, B; Grafström, RC; Grandér, D; Hedenfalk, I; Heyman, M; Ottosson-Wadlund, A; Pokrovskaja, K; Preta, G; Robertson, JD; Söderhäll, S, 2013
)
2.08
"Bortezomib is an important component of the chemotherapy regimen associated with multiple myeloma, and has been previously applied to POEMS syndrome."( Effective induction therapy with subcutaneous administration of bortezomib for newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome: a case report and a review of the literature.
Li, J; Liu, T; Niu, T; Wei, Q; Yang, JR; Yang, YM; Zeng, K, 2013
)
1.35
"Bortezomib (BOR) is an effective drug for the treatment of multiple myeloma and BOR-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN) is a major adverse event. "( Itraconazole may increase the risk of early-onset bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Hashimoto, N; Okamoto, S; Sadahira, K; Tsukada, Y; Ueda, T; Yokoyama, K, 2012
)
2.07
"Bortezomib (Velcade) is a proteasome inhibitor that has shown important clinical efficacy either as a single agent or in combination with other cytostatic agents in multiple myeloma (MM). "( Combined bendamustine, prednisone and bortezomib (BPV) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Ali, HA; Aßmann, M; Becker, C; Bourgeois, M; Edelmann, T; Hensel, G; Heyn, S; Hoffmann, FA; Hurtz, HJ; Jäkel, N; Krahl, R; Löschcke, K; Mohren, M; Moll, B; Niederwieser, D; Pönisch, W; Rohrberg, R; Schmalfeld, M; Schönfelder, U; Schwarzer, A; Wagner, I; Zehrfeld, T, 2013
)
2.1
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor approved for treating patients with multiple myeloma, a plasma cell malignancy."( Targeting plasma cells with proteasome inhibitors: possible roles in treating myasthenia gravis?
Buurman, W; De Baets, MH; Gomez, AM; Losen, M; Martinez-Martinez, P; Molenaar, PC; Willcox, N, 2012
)
1.1
"Bortezomib is an effective antimyeloma therapy, but clinical benefits can be limited by neurotoxicity. "( Weekly intravenous bortezomib is effective and well tolerated in relapsed/refractory myeloma.
Atwal, S; D'Sa, S; Johnston, R; Khan, I; Moore, S; Narat, S; Percy, L; Rabin, N; Sachchithanantham, S; Schey, S; Streetly, M; Yong, K, 2013
)
2.16
"Bortezomib is an antitumor drug that competitively inhibits proteasome beta-1 and beta-5 subunits. "( Alterations of the intracellular peptidome in response to the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.
Berezniuk, I; Castro, LM; Dasgupta, S; Ferro, ES; Fricker, LD; Gelman, JS; Gozzo, FC; Sironi, J, 2013
)
2.06
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor and a drug used for molecular-targeted therapy (targets NF-κB)."( Bortezomib-enhanced radiosensitization through the suppression of radiation-induced nuclear factor-κB activity in human oral cancer cells.
Fujisawa, K; Hara, K; Kinouchi, M; Kuribayashi, N; Miyamoto, Y; Nagai, H; Ohe, G; Takamaru, N; Tamatani, T; Uchida, D, 2013
)
2.55
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with potent antimyeloma activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients. "( Lymphocytopenia is associated with an increased risk of severe infections in patients with multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib-based regimens.
Ahn, JS; Bae, SY; Jung, SH; Kang, SJ; Kim, HJ; Kim, YK; Lee, JJ; Yang, DH, 2013
)
2.04
"Bortezomib is a dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitor that effectively and specifically inhibits proteasome activity."( Proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of B-cell malignancies.
Schenkein, D, 2002
)
1.04
"Bortezomib is a peptide boronic acid inhibitor of the proteasome developed for cancer therapy. "( Effects of the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, on apoptosis in isolated lymphocytes obtained from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Andreeff, M; Calvert, LR; Faderl, S; Keating, M; McConkey, DJ; Niemer, I; Pahler, JC; Ruiz, S, 2003
)
2.03
"Bortezomib is a novel anticancer agent with significant activity in relapsed and refractory MM."( Bortezomib treatment for multiple myeloma.
Stanford, BL; Zondor, SD, 2003
)
2.48
"Bortezomib is a specific and potent proteasome inhibitor."( Simultaneous inhibition of hsp 90 and the proteasome promotes protein ubiquitination, causes endoplasmic reticulum-derived cytosolic vacuolization, and enhances antitumor activity.
Bisht, KS; Gius, D; Isaacs, JS; Mimnaugh, EG; Neckers, L; Vos, M; Xu, W; Yuan, X, 2004
)
1.04
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that was recently approved for treatment of myeloma."( Inhibition of acute graft-versus-host disease with retention of graft-versus-tumor effects by the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.
Barao, I; Blazar, BR; Liu, H; Murphy, WJ; O'Shaughnessy, MJ; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A; Riordan, W; Sayers, TJ; Serody, JS; Sitcheran, R; Sun, K; Welniak, LA; Wysocki, C, 2004
)
1.25
"Bortezomib (PS-341) is an inhibitor of the S26 proteasome. "( The bortezomib-induced mitochondrial damage is mediated by accumulation of active protein kinase C-delta.
Durrant, D; Lee, RM; Liu, J; Yang, HS, 2004
)
2.32
"Bortezomib (VELCADE) is a proteasome inhibitor, which has been recently used for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) with encouraging results. "( Tumour lysis syndrome in multiple myeloma after bortezomib (VELCADE) administration.
Politou, M; Rahemtulla, A; Terpos, E, 2004
)
2.02
"Bortezomib is a potent, reversible proteasome inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of recurrent and/or refractory multiple myeloma, but its activity in patients with renal impairment has not been studied to date."( Bortezomib in recurrent and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Initial clinical experience in patients with impared renal function.
Alexanian, R; Anderson, J; Anderson, KC; Barlogie, B; Berenson, JR; Esseltine, DL; Jagannath, S; Nix, D; Orlowski, RZ; Richardson, PG; Singhal, S; Srkalovic, G, 2005
)
3.21
"Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor with significant antimyeloma activity. "( Bortezomib-induced severe hepatitis in multiple myeloma: a case report.
Bladé, J; Cibeira, MT; Montoto, S; Rosiñol, L, 2005
)
3.21
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with manageable clinical toxicity and laboratory evidence of anti-melanoma activity. "( A phase II study of bortezomib in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma.
Adjei, AA; Albertini, M; Dawkins, F; Erlichman, C; Fitch, T; Fracasso, PM; Geyer, SM; Lorusso, P; Maples, W; Markovic, SN; Sharfman, W, 2005
)
2.09
"Bortezomib is an extremely potent and selective proteasome inhibitor that shows strong activity in in vitro and in vivo laboratory studies against many solid and hematologic tumor types."( Preclinical and clinical development of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in cancer treatment.
Albanell, J; Gascon, P; Mellado, B; Montagut, C; Ross, JS; Rovira, A, 2005
)
1.29
"Bortezomib (PS-341) is a novel antineoplastic agent that is well tolerated at doses not exceeding 3.0 mg (equivalent to 1.75 mg/m2), repeated on D1 and D4 every other week. "( Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib (PS-341): a phase I study with pharmacodynamic end points using a day 1 and day 4 schedule in a 14-day cycle.
Adams, J; Boyden, J; Chachoua, A; Clark, JW; Eder, JP; Elliott, P; Farrell, K; Garcia-Carbonero, R; Hamilton, AL; Kinchla, N; Liebes, L; Muggia, FM; Pavlick, AC; Ryan, DP; Soma, V; Wright, J; Yee, H; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A, 2005
)
2.07
"Bortezomib is a novel, reversible, and highly specific proteasome inhibitor that appears as a new hope for MCL treatment."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib induces apoptosis in mantle-cell lymphoma through generation of ROS and Noxa activation independent of p53 status.
Campo, E; Colomer, D; Montserrat, E; Pérez-Galán, P; Roué, G; Villamor, N, 2006
)
1.36
"Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor approved for therapy of multiple myeloma."( Sequencing bortezomib with chemotherapy and targeted agents.
Adjei, AA, 2005
)
1.44
"Bortezomib is a selective 26S proteasome inhibitor that has been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma."( The potential role of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy and radiation in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Edelman, MJ, 2005
)
1.36
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that can decrease Bcl-2 expression through diminished IkappaB degradation."( Proteasome inhibition in small-cell lung cancer: preclinical rationale and clinical applications.
Bold, RJ; Davies, AM; Gandara, DR; Gumerlock, PH; Lara, PN; Mack, PC, 2005
)
1.05
"Bortezomib is a selective proteasome inhibitor which has shown significant activity in a variety of hematologic malignancies including multiple myeloma, mantle cell lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma. "( Treatment of relapsed or refractory Waldenström's macroglobulinemia with bortezomib.
Anagnostopoulos, A; Bitsaktsis, A; Castritis, E; Dimopoulos, MA; Kyrtsonis, MC; Pangalis, GA, 2005
)
2
"Bortezomib (VELCADE) is a potent inhibitor of the 26S proteasome with broad antitumor activity. "( Bortezomib (VELCADE) in metastatic breast cancer: pharmacodynamics, biological effects, and prediction of clinical benefits.
Booser, DJ; Broglio, KR; Cristofanilli, M; Esseltine, D; Gonzalez-Angulo, AM; Hortobagyi, GN; Islam, R; Krishnamurthy, S; Pusztai, L; Reuben, JM; Stec, J; Yang, CH, 2006
)
3.22
"Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor with significant antimyeloma activity. "( Severe pulmonary complications in Japanese patients after bortezomib treatment for refractory multiple myeloma.
Fujii, T; Kami, M; Kawabata, M; Matsumura, T; Miyakoshi, S; Narimatsu, H; Oshimi, K; Ozawa, K; Sasaki, M; Takatoku, M; Taniguchi, S; Yuji, K, 2006
)
2.02
"Bortezomib is a potent and selective proteasome inhibitor recently introduced in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). "( Bortezomib: an effective agent in extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma.
Bladé, J; Cibeira, MT; Laura, R; Montserrat, E; Salamero, O; Uriburu, C; Yantorno, S, 2006
)
3.22
"Bortezomib (VELCADE) is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor developed specifically for use as an antineoplastic agent."( Bortezomib: proteasome inhibition as an effective anticancer therapy.
Mitsiades, C; Richardson, PG, 2005
)
2.49
"Bortezomib (1) is a potent first-in-class dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitor employed in the treatment of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma where the disease is refractory to conventional lines of therapy. "( Oxidative deboronation of the peptide boronic acid proteasome inhibitor bortezomib: contributions from reactive oxygen species in this novel cytochrome P450 reaction.
Daniels, JS; Gan, LS; Huang, R; Labutti, J; Miwa, G; Parsons, I, 2006
)
2.01
"Bortezomib, which is a proteasome inhibitor and inhibits NF-kappaB activity, has also excellent efficacy like thalidomide."( [New treatment strategy of multiple myeloma for cure].
Handa, H; Murakami, H, 2006
)
1.06
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor which seems to be effective in MDS."( Bortezomib is an effective agent for MDS/MPD syndrome with 5q- anomaly and thrombocytosis.
Banti, A; Kaloutsi, V; Lazaridou, A; Terpos, E; Verrou, E; Zervas, K, 2007
)
2.5
"Bortezomib is a biologically active agent, producing predictable, dose-related and reversible proteasome inhibition; it has shown antitumor activity in various malignancies and is the first proteasome inhibitor to be used in clinical practice."( Bortezomib: efficacy comparisons in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.
Amadori, S; Boccadoro, M; Caravita, T; de Fabritiis, P; Palumbo, A, 2006
)
2.5
"Bortezomib is a selective and reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome that shows potent antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo against several human cancers of adulthood. "( Effect of bortezomib on human neuroblastoma cell growth, apoptosis, and angiogenesis.
Brignole, C; Cilli, M; Cioni, M; Corrias, MV; Di Paolo, D; Marimpietri, D; Nico, B; Pagnan, G; Pastorino, F; Pezzolo, A; Piccardi, F; Pistoia, V; Ponzoni, M; Ribatti, D, 2006
)
2.18
"Bortezomib is an effective inhibitor of neuroblastoma cell growth and angiogenesis. "( Effect of bortezomib on human neuroblastoma cell growth, apoptosis, and angiogenesis.
Brignole, C; Cilli, M; Cioni, M; Corrias, MV; Di Paolo, D; Marimpietri, D; Nico, B; Pagnan, G; Pastorino, F; Pezzolo, A; Piccardi, F; Pistoia, V; Ponzoni, M; Ribatti, D, 2006
)
2.18
"Bortezomib is a first-in-class proteasome inhibitor developed as an antineoplastic agent with marked activity in relapsed/refractory MM."( Response to bortezomib and activation of osteoblasts in multiple myeloma.
Cavallo, F; Esseltine, D; Tricot, G; Yaccoby, S; Zangari, M, 2006
)
1.43
"Bortezomib (Velcade) is a proteasome inhibitor, which is used as a novel anticancer drug in the treatment of multiple myeloma."( Pleomorphic presentation of cutaneous lesions associated with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma.
Heule, F; Lam, K; Sonneveld, P; Wu, KL, 2006
)
1.28
"Bortezomib is a proteosome inhibitor with good clinical activity in multiple myeloma. "( Severe pulmonary complications in African-American patient after bortezomib therapy.
Arena, FP; Ohri, A,
)
1.81
"Bortezomib (Btz), is a proteasome inhibitor, currently undergoing clinical trials whose function, at least in part, by stabilizing the IkappaBalpha protein and inhibiting NFkappaB activation."( Bortezomib induces different apoptotic rates in B-CLL cells according to IgVH and BCL-6 mutations.
Benet, I; García-Conde, J; Jantus-Lewintre, E; Sarsotti, E; Terol, MJ, 2006
)
2.5
"Bortezomib is a reversible proteasome inhibitor with significant activity in MM."( Activity and safety of bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients with advanced renal failure: a multicenter retrospective study.
Chanan-Khan, AA; Kaufman, JL; Lonial, S; Mehta, J; Miller, KC; Munshi, NC; Richardson, PG; Schlossman, R; Singhal, S; Tariman, J, 2007
)
1.37
"Bortezomib (PS-341) is a newly developed proteosome inhibitor that shows extremely promising antineoplastic effects against a variety of neoplasias. "( Quantitative sensory findings in patients with bortezomib-induced pain.
Burton, AW; Cata, JP; Dougherty, PM; Giralt, S; Villareal, H; Weng, HR, 2007
)
2.04
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that can be effective in the treatment of refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma. "( Lung injury associated with bortezomib therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Japan: a questionnaire-based report from the "lung injury by bortezomib" joint committee of the Japanese society of hematology and the Japanese society of clinical h
Dan, K; Gotoh, A; Hotta, T; Ikeda, Y; Ohyashiki, K; Oshimi, K; Usui, N, 2006
)
2.07
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor which target mainly is NF-kappaB."( [Salvage therapy with proteasome inhibitor bortezomib for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma].
Bo, J; Da, WM; Gao, CJ; Huang, WR; Jing, Y; Li, R; Wang, QS; Wu, XX; Yu, L; Zhang, YZ, 2006
)
1.32
"Bortezomib is a new proteasome inhibitor with a high antitumor activity, but also with a potentially severe peripheral neurotoxicity. "( Bortezomib-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: a neurophysiological and pathological study in the rat.
Bossi, M; Canta, A; Cavaletti, G; Ceresa, C; D'Incalci, M; De Coster, R; Gilardini, A; Marmiroli, P; Oggioni, N; Rigamonti, L; Rodriguez-Menendez, V, 2007
)
3.23
"Bortezomib is a novel agent that inhibits proteasome and has shown activity against multiple myeloma."( Bortezomib-induced tumor lysis syndrome in multiple myeloma.
Boral, AL; Esseltine, DL; Jakob, C; Mehta, J; Richardson, P; Sezer, O; Singhal, S; Stadtmauer, E; Vesole, DH, 2006
)
2.5
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that can be effective in the treatment of refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma. "( [Lung injury associated with bortezomib therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Japan: a questionnaire-based report from the "Lung Injury by Bortezomib" Joint Committee of the Japanese Society of Hematology and the Japanese Society of Clinical
Dan, K; Gotoh, A; Hotta, T; Ikeda, Y; Ohyashiki, K; Oshimi, K; Usui, N, 2006
)
2.07
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with proven efficacy in multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. "( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib acts independently of p53 and induces cell death via apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe in B-cell lymphoma cell lines.
Allen, P; Higginbottom, K; Joel, SP; Jüliger, S; Lister, TA; Maharaj, L; Schenkein, D; Strauss, SJ, 2007
)
2.09
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has been approved by FDA for the treatment of multiple myeloma and that has completed phase 1 testing in children. "( Initial testing (stage 1) of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib by the pediatric preclinical testing program.
Carol, H; Houghton, PJ; Keir, ST; Keshelava, N; Kolb, EA; Lock, R; Maris, JM; Morton, CL; Reynolds, CP; Smith, MA; Wu, J, 2008
)
2.04
"Bortezomib appears to be an effective drug for PCL that could significantly improve the usually adverse clinical outcome of these patients."( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in patients with plasma cell leukemia.
D'Arena, G; Ferrara, F; Filardi, N; Gay, F; Guariglia, R; Guglielmelli, T; Musto, P; Palumbo, A; Pitini, V; Rossini, F, 2007
)
2.09
"Bortezomib is a potent drug for the treatment of multiple myeloma. "( Bortezomib significantly impairs the immunostimulatory capacity of human myeloid blood dendritic cells.
Bachmann, M; Bornhäuser, M; Rieber, EP; Schmitz, M; Straube, C; Wehner, R; Wendisch, M, 2007
)
3.23
"Bortezomib is an FDA-approved proteasome inhibitor that is currently under clinical investigation in multiple neoplasms but has not been studied extensively in MPM."( Preclinical studies of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Bueno, R; Gordon, GJ; Kindler, HL; Mani, M; Maulik, G; Mukhopadhyay, L; Salgia, R; Sugarbaker, DJ; Yeap, BY, 2008
)
1.32
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). "( A pivotal role for Mcl-1 in Bortezomib-induced apoptosis.
Amiot, M; Anderson, KC; Chauhan, D; Gouill, SL; Harousseau, JL; Hideshima, T; Opferman, JT; Podar, K; Tai, YT; Zhang, J; Zorn, E, 2008
)
2.08
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with pleiotropic antitumor activity. "( Bortezomib inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor burden in a murine model of neuroblastoma.
Davidoff, AM; Dickson, PV; Hamner, JB; Ng, CY; Sims, TL; Spence, Y; Zhou, J, 2007
)
3.23
"Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor that has shown marked antitumor effects in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). "( Therapy with bortezomib plus dexamethasone induces osteoblast activation in responsive patients with multiple myeloma.
Abe, M; Asano, J; Choraku, M; Fujii, S; Hashimoto, T; Kagawa, K; Kitazoe, K; Matsumoto, T; Miki, H; Ozaki, S; Shigekiyo, Y; Takeuchi, K; Tanaka, O, 2007
)
2.15
"Bortezomib is a novel molecular targeting agent which was designed to exhibit an antitumor effect by selectively inhibiting the 20S proteasome."( Proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, for myeloma and lymphoma.
Tobinai, K, 2007
)
1.38
"Bortezomib is a novel anti-cancer agent which has shown promising activity in non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. "( The proteasomal and apoptotic phenotype determine bortezomib sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer cells.
Checińska, A; Giaccone, G; Voortman, J, 2007
)
2.04
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with proven activity in multiple myeloma, and the addition of dexamethasone results in superior outcome."( Treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis with the combination of bortezomib and dexamethasone.
Anagnostopoulos, A; Delibasi, S; Dimopoulos, MA; Kastritis, E; Mellou, S; Migkou, M; Nanas, J; Pamboukas, C; Psimenou, E; Roussou, M; Tassidou, A; Terpos, E; Toumanidis, S; Xilouri, I, 2007
)
1.3
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that has direct antitumor effects. "( Sensitization of tumor cells to NK cell-mediated killing by proteasome inhibition.
Ames, E; Barao, I; Hallett, WH; Hudig, D; Motarjemi, M; Murphy, WJ; Sayers, TJ; Shanker, A; Tamang, DL, 2008
)
1.79
"Bortezomib is a small-molecule proteasome inhibitor with single-agent activity in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and synergy with gemcitabine in preclinical studies. "( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a California Cancer Consortium Phase I study.
Bold, R; Davies, AM; Gandara, DR; Gumerlock, PH; Lara, PN; Lau, DH; Lenz, HJ; Ruel, C; Schenkein, DP; Shibata, S, 2008
)
2.09
"Bortezomib (Velcade) is a boron containing molecule which reversibly inhibits the proteasome, an intracellular organelle which is central to the breakdown of ubiquinated proteins and consequently crucial for normal cellular homeostasis. "( Position statement on the use of bortezomib in multiple myeloma.
Cavenagh, JD; Davies, FE; Jackson, GH; Morgan, GJ, 2008
)
2.07
"Bortezomib (Velcad) is a proteasome inhibitor recently developed and mainly used for the treatment of multiple myeloma. "( Bortezomib-induced skin eruption.
Dietrich, PY; Favet, L; Kerl, K; Piguet, V; Sanchez-Politta, S, 2008
)
3.23
"Bortezomib (Bzb) is a clinically available proteasome inhibitor used in the treatment of multiple myeloma."( Pharmacologic targeting of a stem/progenitor population in vivo is associated with enhanced bone regeneration in mice.
Anderson, KC; Aronson, JP; Bouxsein, ML; Chhetri, S; Fulciniti, M; Glimcher, LH; Hideshima, T; Jones, DC; Lian, JB; Liu, JC; Mukherjee, S; Patel, C; Pozzi, S; Purton, LE; Raje, N; Scadden, DT; Schoonmaker, JA; Seo, YD; Stein, G; Vallet, S; Wein, MN, 2008
)
1.07
"Bortezomib is an inhibitor of proteasome and NF-kappaB, with activity in various solid tumors and hematological malignancies."( Activity of bortezomib in adult de novo and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.
Debski, R; Dytfeld, D; Gil, L; Kazmierczak, M; Kolodziej, B; Komarnicki, M; Kubicka, M; Nowicki, A; Rafinska, B; Styczynski, J; Wysocki, M,
)
1.95
"Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with preclinical activity against UC."( Phase II study of bortezomib in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial tract transitional cell carcinoma: CALGB 90207.
Atkins, JN; Bajorin, DF; Halabi, S; Himelstein, AL; Hohl, RJ; Millard, F; Rosenberg, JE; Sanford, BL; Small, EJ, 2008
)
1.4
"Bortezomib is a boronic acid dipeptide derivative, which is a selective and potent inhibitor of the proteasome and has prominent effects in vitro and in vivo against several solid tumors."( Effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents in gastric cancer cell lines.
Bae, SH; Hyun, MS; Kim, MK; Lee, KH; Ryoo, HM; Sin, JI, 2008
)
1.34
"Bortezomib is an efficacy drug for the second line treatment of MM."( [Efficiency of bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma treatment: retrospective study in consecutive cases].
Encinas García, S; Izarzugaza Perón, Y; Khosravi Shahi, P; Pérez Manga, G; Sabin Domínguez, P, 2008
)
1.42
"Bortezomib is a novel, first-in-class proteasome inhibitor that has improved outcomes in multiple myeloma, with manageable toxicities."( Bortezomib in multiple myeloma.
Dimopoulos, MA; Roussou, M; Terpos, E, 2008
)
3.23

Effects

Bortezomib has a potential risk to cause drug-induced GMA without systemic thrombotic microangiopathy, in which vascular endothelial growth factor-nuclear factor-κ B pathway could be involved. The drug has a 33% response rate in relapsed/refractory MCL.

Bortezomib has shown significant efficacy in the treatment of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) and is generally well tolerated. The drug has been shown to affect multiple cellular pathways and levels of numerous intracellular proteins, including targets of importance in hematologic malignancies.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Bortezomib has a potential risk to cause drug-induced GMA without systemic thrombotic microangiopathy, in which vascular endothelial growth factor-nuclear factor-κ B pathway could be involved."( Bortezomib-induced glomerular microangiopathy complicated with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease.
Kitayama, C; Mizuno, S; Sanada, S; Sato, T, 2021
)
2.79
"Bortezomib has a 33% response rate in relapsed/refractory MCL and has shown additive and/or synergistic effects in preclinical trials with known effective agents."( Phase 2 trial of bortezomib in combination with rituximab plus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with bortezomib, rituximab, methotrexate, and cytarabine for untreated mantle cell lymphoma.
Fanale, M; Fayad, LE; Feng, L; Ford, P; Fowler, N; Goy, A; Hagemeister, F; Hartig, K; Kantarjian, HM; Kwak, LW; McLaughlin, P; Medeiros, LJ; Naig, A; Neelapu, S; Oki, Y; Orlowski, R; Pro, B; Rodriguez, MA; Romaguera, JE; Samaniego, F; Smith, J; Valentinetti, M; Wang, M; Younes, A, 2018
)
1.54
"Bortezomib has been used as a first-line for treating MM for decades."( Bortezomib Rescues Ovariectomy-Induced Bone Loss via SMURF-Mediated Ubiquitination Pathway.
Fang, Y; He, F; Hou, M; Liu, Y; Lu, Y; Shen, X; Shi, Q; Yang, H; Zhang, Y; Zhao, Z; Zhu, T; Zhu, X, 2021
)
2.79
"Bortezomib has shown clinical success in the treatment of multiple myeloma."( Treatment with bortezomib for recurrent proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits in kidney allograft. Case report and review of the literature.
Ishida, H; Oki, R; Takagi, T; Taneda, S; Unagami, K, 2022
)
1.8
"Bortezomib has become the primary drug in the treatment of patients with MM."( Baseline peripheral neuropathy was associated with age and a prognostic factor in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.
Cai, Z; Dong, M; Han, X; He, J; Zhang, J; Zheng, G, 2022
)
1.44
"Bortezomib has many side effects, mainly hematological, neurological, and gastrointestinal."( Pneumonitis associated with bortezomib in a patient with multiple myeloma.
Çeneli, Ö; Kars, TU; Yaşkıran, O, 2023
)
1.93
"Bortezomib and ixazomib have been found to reduce tumor weight briefly, but once the dose is reduced, the tumor begins to grow again. "( Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics Modeling and Evaluation of Tumor Response to Bortezomib Proteasome Inhibitor in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia.
Bhatti, AI; Fazal, S; Munir, A; Sajjad, B, 2023
)
2.58
"Bortezomib has putative activity against Kaposi's."( Iatrogenic Kaposi's sarcoma from induction therapy for myeloma: to transplant or not to transplant?
Babic, D; Farrugia, D; Grech, M; Sultana, E, 2023
)
1.63
"Bortezomib has been successful for treatment of multiple myeloma, but not against solid tumors, and toxicities of neuropathy, thrombocytopenia and the emergence of resistance have triggered efforts to find alternative proteasome inhibitors. "( Development and anticancer properties of Up284, a spirocyclic candidate ADRM1/RPN13 inhibitor.
Anchoori, RK; Anchoori, V; Chang, YN; Das, S; Karanam, B; Lam, B; Patnam, R; Poddatoori, D; Roden, RBS; Rudek, MA; Tseng, SH; Velasquez, FC, 2023
)
2.35
"Bortezomib, which has been FDA-approved for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, was further investigated in downstream studies."( Bortezomib inhibits chikungunya virus replication by interfering with viral protein synthesis.
Chu, JJH; Dutta, SK; Kaur, P; Lello, LS; Merits, A; Utt, A, 2020
)
2.72
"Bortezomib has been reported to prevent the progression of fibrosis in organs."( Bortezomib limits renal allograft interstitial fibrosis by inhibiting NF-κB/TNF-α/Akt/mTOR/P70S6K/Smurf2 pathway via IκBα protein stabilization.
Chen, H; Fei, S; Gu, M; Gui, Z; Suo, C; Tan, R; Wang, Z; Zheng, M; Zhou, J, 2021
)
2.79
"Bortezomib has a potential risk to cause drug-induced GMA without systemic thrombotic microangiopathy, in which vascular endothelial growth factor-nuclear factor-κ B pathway could be involved."( Bortezomib-induced glomerular microangiopathy complicated with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease.
Kitayama, C; Mizuno, S; Sanada, S; Sato, T, 2021
)
2.79
"Bortezomib (BTZ) has demonstrated its efficacy in several hematological disorders and has been associated with thrombocytopenia. "( The Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib Induces Apoptosis and Activation in Gel-Filtered Human Platelets.
Debreceni, IB; Fejes, Z; Ghansah, H; Kappelmayer, J; Nagy, B, 2021
)
2.37
"Bortezomib has been extensively studied for the maintenance treatment of MM."( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.
Chen, L; Chu, ZB; Hu, Y; Li, JY; Sun, CY; Zhang, L, 2017
)
1.49
"Bortezomib has a 33% response rate in relapsed/refractory MCL and has shown additive and/or synergistic effects in preclinical trials with known effective agents."( Phase 2 trial of bortezomib in combination with rituximab plus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with bortezomib, rituximab, methotrexate, and cytarabine for untreated mantle cell lymphoma.
Fanale, M; Fayad, LE; Feng, L; Ford, P; Fowler, N; Goy, A; Hagemeister, F; Hartig, K; Kantarjian, HM; Kwak, LW; McLaughlin, P; Medeiros, LJ; Naig, A; Neelapu, S; Oki, Y; Orlowski, R; Pro, B; Rodriguez, MA; Romaguera, JE; Samaniego, F; Smith, J; Valentinetti, M; Wang, M; Younes, A, 2018
)
1.54
"Bortezomib has been widely used to treat multiple myeloma and other hematological malignancies. "( Genome-Wide Profiling of the Toxic Effect of Bortezomib on Human Esophageal Carcinoma Epithelial Cells.
Ao, N; Chen, Q; Dai, Y; Feng, Y; Li, M; Liu, F; Liu, G; Wang, C; Yu, J, 2019
)
2.22
"Bortezomib has also demonstrated clinical efficacy both as a single drug and in combination with other agents in light chain amyloidosis, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, and peripheral T-cell lymphomas."( Bortezomib for the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies: 15 Years Later.
Robak, P; Robak, T, 2019
)
2.68
"Bortezomib has remarkably improved MM patient outcome, but dose-limiting toxicities and development of resistance limit its long-term utility."( Intracellular NAD⁺ depletion enhances bortezomib-induced anti-myeloma activity.
Acharya, C; Anderson, KC; Cagnetta, A; Calimeri, T; Cea, M; Chauhan, D; Fulciniti, M; Gobbi, M; Hideshima, T; Munshi, N; Nencioni, A; Patrone, F; Richardson, P; Tai, YT; Zhong, MY, 2013
)
1.38
"Bortezomib has appeared recently as a potential active treatment for acute AMR for few years. "( Failure of bortezomib to cure acute antibody-mediated rejection in a non-compliant renal transplant patient.
Allain-Launay, E; Blancho, G; Blin, N; Cesbron, A; Moreau, A; Roussey, G; Ryckewaert, A, 2013
)
2.22
"Bortezomib (Btz) has emerged as a standard of care in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but Btz-induced peripheral neuropathy (PNP) has a particularly negative impact on patients' quality of life. "( Bortezomib administered subcutaneously is well tolerated in bortezomib-based combination regimens used in patients with multiple myeloma.
Drach, J; Drach-Schauer, B; Eder, S; Lamm, W, 2013
)
3.28
"Bortezomib has demonstrated substantial activity in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and is widely incorporated into treatment strategies across the different settings. "( The effects of bortezomib on bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma.
Malard, F; Mohty, B; Mohty, M; Moreau, P; Savani, B; Terpos, E, 2014
)
2.2
"Bortezomib has been known as the most promising anti-cancer drug for multiple myeloma (MM). "( Establishment and characterization of bortezomib-resistant U266 cell line: constitutive activation of NF-κB-mediated cell signals and/or alterations of ubiquitylation-related genes reduce bortezomib-induced apoptosis.
Ahn, KS; Bae, EK; Choi, JH; Jung, WJ; Lee, C; Park, J; Yoon, SS, 2014
)
2.12
"Bortezomib therapy has shown promising clinical activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but the development of resistance to proteasome inhibition may limit its efficacy. "( Synergistic antitumor activity of lenalidomide with the BET bromodomain inhibitor CPI203 in bortezomib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma.
Balsas, P; Campo, E; Colomer, D; Martínez, A; Montraveta, A; Moros, A; Normant, E; Pérez-Galán, P; Rodríguez, V; Roué, G; Saborit-Villarroya, I; Sandy, P; Wiestner, A, 2014
)
2.07
"Bortezomib therapy has been proven successful for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). "( Down-regulation of CD9 by methylation decreased bortezomib sensitivity in multiple myeloma.
Du, H; Hu, X; Huang, J; Jiang, H; Xuan, H, 2014
)
2.1
"Bortezomib has been used to reduce HLA antibody in patients either before transplantation or as treatment for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). "( Differential effect of bortezomib on HLA class I and class II antibody.
Leffell, MS; Montgomery, RA; Philogene, MC; Sikorski, P; Zachary, AA, 2014
)
2.16
"Bortezomib has significantly improved multiple myeloma (MM) response rates, but strategies for choosing bortezomib-based regimens for initial MM therapy are not standardized. "( The choice of regimens based on bortezomib for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Cai, Z; Fu, J; Han, X; He, J; Huang, H; Huang, W; Li, L; Shi, J; Wei, G; Wu, W; Xie, W; Yang, L; Ye, X; Zhang, J; Zhang, X; Zhao, Y; Zheng, G; Zheng, W, 2014
)
2.13
"Bortezomib has been proposed to stimulate autophagy, but scientific observations did not always support this."( Bortezomib enhances cancer cell death by blocking the autophagic flux through stimulating ERK phosphorylation.
Chao, A; Chen, GC; Chuang, WC; Huang, WP; Kao, C; Lai, CH; Lin, CY; Tsai, CL; Wang, HS; Wang, TH, 2014
)
2.57
"Bortezomib has been widely used for the treatment of MM with encouraging results, but TLS seems to occur more frequently in patients with MM receiving bortezomib than in patients receiving other conventional agents."( Management of tumor lysis syndrome in patients with multiple myeloma during bortezomib treatment.
Gao, W; Jian, Y; Wang, L; Wu, Y; Yang, G; Zuo, L, 2015
)
1.37
"Bortezomib has antitumor activity on a variety of hematological malignancies and exhibits a number of favorable immunomodulatory effects that include inhibition of dendritic cells."( Short Course of Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Bortezomib for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention after Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Is Feasible and Yields Favorable Results: A Phase I Study.
Al-Homsi, AS; Bogema, M; Cole, K; Duffner, U; Mageed, A; Williams, S, 2015
)
1.38
"Bortezomib has become a cornerstone in the treatment of AL amyloidosis. "( Translocation t(11;14) is associated with adverse outcome in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis when treated with bortezomib-based regimens.
Benner, A; Bochtler, T; Goldschmidt, H; Granzow, M; Hegenbart, U; Ho, AD; Hose, D; Jauch, A; Kimmich, C; Kunz, C; Schönland, SO; Seckinger, A, 2015
)
2.07
"Bortezomib treatment has shown upregulated DIABLO and NF-κBIB (a NF-κB inhibitor) and downregulated NF-κB1, NF-κB2, and BIRC1 gene expressions. "( Bortezomib and Arsenic Trioxide Activity on a Myelodysplastic Cell Line (P39): A Gene Expression Study.
Canesastraro, M; Di Raimondo, F; Galimberti, S; Nagy, B; Palumbo, G; Petrini, M; Savlı, H; Sünnetçi, D, 2015
)
3.3
"Bortezomib has been increasingly used especially in renal related indications such as multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance."( Bortezomib-induced acute interstitial nephritis.
Angioi, A; Cheungpasitporn, W; Cornell, LD; Fervenza, FC; Leung, N; Rajkumar, SV; Sethi, S, 2015
)
2.58
"Bortezomib (bort) has improved overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but the majority of them develop drug resistance. "( Halting pro-survival autophagy by TGFβ inhibition in bone marrow fibroblasts overcomes bortezomib resistance in multiple myeloma patients.
Angelucci, E; Annese, T; Catacchio, I; Dammacco, F; De Veirman, K; Derudas, D; Desantis, V; Di Marzo, L; Frassanito, MA; Fumarulo, R; Maffia, M; Menu, E; Nico, B; Racanelli, V; Ria, R; Ribatti, D; Ruggieri, S; Vacca, A; Vanderkerken, K; Vergara, D, 2016
)
2.1
"Bortezomib has been shown to induce apoptosis and inhibit cell growth of many cancer cells."( Bortezomib-mediated downregulation of S-phase kinase protein-2 (SKP2) causes apoptotic cell death in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.
Bhat, AA; Iskandarani, A; Khan, MA; Krishnankutty, R; Kulinski, M; Kuttikrishnan, S; Mohammad, RM; Nasr, RR; Prabhu, KS; Siveen, KS; Uddin, S, 2016
)
2.6
"Bortezomib has been used in adults for the reversal of antibody-mediated rejection; however, pediatric data are limited."( Bortezomib in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A multicenter Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium study.
Ashoor, I; Chen, A; Claes, D; Jandeska, S; Kizilbash, S; Matar, RB; Misurac, J; Sherbotie, J; Twombley, K; Verghese, P, 2017
)
2.62
"Bortezomib has demonstrated significant activity in clinical trials, mainly against recurrent or newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). "( Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma: a comprehensive review of the literature.
Argyriou, AA; Iconomou, G; Kalofonos, HP, 2008
)
3.23
"Bortezomib has been used in multiple myeloma and other lymphoid malignancies because of its antitumor activity."( Antitumor activity of bortezomib alone and in combination with TRAIL in human acute myeloid leukemia.
Adamo, L; Anastasi, G; Caruso, L; Conticello, C; Cupri, A; De Maria, R; Di Raimondo, F; Giuffrida, R; Giustolisi, R; Gulisano, M; Iannolo, G; Moschetti, G; Palumbo, GA; Vicari, L, 2008
)
1.38
"Bortezomib has significantly advanced the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). "( Bortezomib and the increased incidence of herpes zoster in patients with multiple myeloma.
Do, YR; Joo, YD; Kim, BS; Kim, H; Kim, HJ; Kim, I; Kim, K; Kim, SJ; Kwon, JH; Lee, HJ; Lee, JH; Lee, NR; Lee, WS; Nam, SH; Shin, HJ; Sohn, SK; Suh, C; Won, JH; Yoon, SS, 2008
)
3.23
"Bortezomib has been introduced recently in the therapy of multiple myeloma (MM), a disease that is frequently associated with progressive renal failure. "( Bortezomib-induced survival signals and genes in human proximal tubular cells.
Eder, S; Enrich, J; Hochegger, K; Mayer, B; Mayer, G; Perco, P; Pirklbauer, M; Rosenkranz, AR; Rudnicki, M; Sarközi, R; Schramek, H; Wiesinger, M, 2008
)
3.23
"Bortezomib has recently become the new treatment standard for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. "( Effects of combination treatment of bortezomib and dexamethasone in SCCHN cell lines depend on tumor cell specificity.
Arnoldner, C; Baghi, M; Bisdas, S; Gstöttner, W; Hambek, M; Knecht, R; May, A; Wagenblast, J, 2008
)
2.06
"Bortezomib therapy has become an important part of the standard of care for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, and preliminary clinical evidence suggests that bortezomib retreatment in patients previously treated with the drug may prolong disease control. "( Utility of bortezomib retreatment in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients: a multicenter case series.
Battleman, DS; LeBlanc, A; Richardson, PG; Schuster, M; Walters, IB; Wolf, J, 2008
)
2.18
"Bortezomib has offered some patients with relapsed and refractory disease an opportunity for prolonged survival."( Clinical and immunohistochemical features associated with a response to bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma.
Dawson, MA; Donovan, M; Hertzberg, M; Horvath, N; McLean, CA; Monaghan, K; Opat, SS; Prince, HM; Roberts, AW; Spencer, A; Taouk, Y; Zammit, M, 2009
)
1.31
"Bortezomib has been shown to induce synergistic activity when combined with other antineoplastic agents."( The combined therapeutic effects of bortezomib and fenretinide on neuroblastoma cells involve endoplasmic reticulum stress response.
Brignole, C; Carosio, R; Cilli, M; Di Paolo, D; Galietta, LJ; Loi, M; Marimpietri, D; Nico, B; Pagnan, G; Pastorino, F; Pezzolo, A; Piccardi, F; Pistoia, V; Ponzoni, M; Ribatti, D, 2009
)
1.35
"Bortezomib has been shown to be a safe and efficacious for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). "( Safety and efficacy results from an international expanded access programme to bortezomib for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: a subset analysis of the Australian and New Zealand data of 111 patients.
Butcher, BE; Cannell, P; Horvath, N; Mikhael, JR; Prince, HM; Quach, H, 2009
)
2.02
"Bortezomib has anticancer effects on neuroblastoma cells in vitro and in a metastatic xenograft model. "( Effects of bortezomib on human neuroblastoma cells in vitro and in a metastatic xenograft model.
Haane, C; Nehmann, N; Schumacher, U; Valentiner, U, 2009
)
2.19
"Bortezomib has proven to be effective as single agent in myeloma patients. "( Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is highly effective in relapsed and refractory myeloma patients but responses are short-lived.
Algarotti, A; Corso, A; Lazzarino, M; Mangiacavalli, S; Pascutto, C; Pica, GM; Varettoni, M; Zappasodi, P, 2009
)
3.24
"Bortezomib has shown significant efficacy in the treatment of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) and is generally well tolerated. "( Multiple significant bortezomib-related toxicities in one patient: case report and literature review.
Knopf, KB; Moretto, JC; Waller, JM, 2009
)
2.11
"Bortezomib has minimal activity as a single-agent in the treatment of recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC/PPC. "( A phase II evaluation of bortezomib in the treatment of recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Aghajanian, C; Blessing, JA; Darcy, KM; DeGeest, K; Mannel, RS; Reid, G; Riordan, W; Rotmensch, J; Rubin, SC; Schilder, RJ, 2009
)
2.1
"Bortezomib has shown synergistic effects with melphalan and no prolonged hematologic toxicity."( Bortezomib and high-dose melphalan as conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with de novo multiple myeloma: a phase 2 study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM).
Araujo, C; Attal, M; Avet-Loiseau, H; Caillot, D; Danho, C; Dib, M; Dorvaux, V; Fruchart, C; Garderet, L; Harousseau, JL; Hulin, C; Huynh, A; Kolb, B; Lenain, P; Marit, G; Mary, JY; Mathiot, C; Moreau, P; Pégourié, B; Randriamalala, E; Roussel, M; Royer, B; Stoppa, AM, 2010
)
2.52
"Bortezomib has been shown to be highly active in MM patients with RI."( Safety and efficacy of bortezomib-based regimens for multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: a retrospective study of Italian Myeloma Network GIMEMA.
Baldini, L; Boccadoro, M; Bringhen, S; Callea, V; Casulli, AF; Catalano, L; Cavo, M; Ciolli, S; Di Raimondo, F; Galimberti, S; Gentile, M; Mannina, D; Mele, G; Morabito, F; Musto, P; Offidani, M; Palmieri, S; Palumbo, A; Petrucci, MT; Pinotti, G; Piro, E; Tosi, P, 2010
)
1.39
"Bortezomib has been shown to affect multiple cellular pathways and levels of numerous intracellular proteins, including targets of importance in hematologic malignancies. "( Enhancing activity and overcoming chemoresistance in hematologic malignancies with bortezomib: preclinical mechanistic studies.
Czuczman, MS; Reddy, N, 2010
)
2.03
"Bortezomib has been shown to strongly induce osteoblast differentiation and elevate the levels of osteoblast-related differentiation markers in the serum of patients with myeloma."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib inhibits FGF-2-induced reduction of TAZ levels in osteoblast-like cells.
Aoki, K; Eda, H; Kato, S; Marumo, K; Ohkawa, K; Okawa, Y; Takada, K; Tanaka, T, 2010
)
1.39
"Bortezomib has no adverse effect on stem cell harvesting and engraftment, making it a feasible treatment option in transplantation-eligible patients."( Bortezomib as a treatment option in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia.
Chen, C; Dimopoulos, MA; Gavriatopoulou, M; Kastritis, E; Treon, SP, 2010
)
2.52
"Bortezomib has been successfully used in the treatment of multiple myeloma and has been proposed as a potential treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. "( Role of NOXA and its ubiquitination in proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells.
Baou, M; Butterworth, M; Cohen, GM; Dinsdale, D; Dyer, MJ; Eldering, E; Kohlhaas, SL; Majid, A; Vogler, M; Walewska, R, 2010
)
1.8
"Bortezomib has proven to be successful in the treatment of multiple myeloma, and its mechanism indicates that it may have merit in autoimmune or other plasmacytic disorders."( Treatment with bortezomib of a patient having hyper IgG4 disease.
Colby, TV; Fonseca, R; Khan, ML; Viggiano, RW, 2010
)
1.43
"Bortezomib has been well tolerated."( The fate of anti-HLA antibody among renal transplantation recipients treated with bortezomib.
Dagher, NN; Lonze, BE; Montgomery, RA; Segev, DL; Simpkins, CE; Singer, AL; Zachary, AA, 2009
)
1.3
"Bortezomib has proven to be active in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), including elderly patients. "( Bortezomib plus intermediate-dose dexamethasone and thalidomide in elderly untreated patients with multiple myeloma: a Chinese experience.
Chen, F; Chen, H; Guo, H; Jiang, Y; Lu, M; Mao, J; Qian, X; Shen, Y; Sun, C; Sun, H; Xia, J; Yang, G; Zhou, X; Zhuang, Y, 2010
)
3.25
"Bortezomib has preclinical and clinical in B-cell lymphomas, both alone and in combination with other agents. "( Phase 1 trial of bortezomib plus R-CHOP in previously untreated patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Cheung, YK; Coleman, M; Elstrom, R; Furman, RR; LaCasce, AS; Leonard, JP; Martin, P; Ruan, J; Vose, JM, 2010
)
2.14
"Bortezomib has shown single agent activity of 33% in relapsed MCL and has an additive/synergistic effect in vitro when combined with drugs currently used to treat MCL."( Phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with rituximab-HyperCVAD alternating with rituximab, methotrexate and cytarabine for untreated aggressive mantle cell lymphoma.
Fayad, LE; Feldman, T; Ford, P; Goldberg, S; Goy, A; Hartig, K; Kwak, LW; McLaughlin, P; Pecora, A; Pro, B; Rodriguez, A; Romaguera, JE; Smith, J; Wang, M; Weaver, P, 2010
)
1.42
"Bortezomib has also been successfully used several times in heavily pre-treated patients with myeloma relapse or progression after allogeneic stem cell transplantation."( [Bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation].
Vokurka, S, 2010
)
1.99
"Bortezomib has shown a positive clinical benefit either alone or as a part of combination therapy to induce chemo-/radio-sensitization or overcome drug resistance."( Bortezomib as the first proteasome inhibitor anticancer drug: current status and future perspectives.
Chen, D; Dou, QP; Frezza, M; Kanwar, J; Schmitt, S, 2011
)
2.53
"Bortezomib has received US Federal Drug Administration approval for the treatment of the hematologic malignancies such as multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma."( Targeting the proteasome with bortezomib in multiple myeloma: update on therapeutic benefit as an upfront single agent, induction regimen for stem-cell transplantation and as maintenance therapy.
Annunziata, CM; Burris, J; Driscoll, JJ, 2012
)
1.39
"Bortezomib has shown antihemostatic effects in patients with relapsed or refractory MM, which supports that it exerts antithrombotic actions and thus potentially provides a protective effect in combination with regimens with an elevated VTE risk."( Low venous thromboembolic risk with bortezomib in multiple myeloma and potential protective effect with thalidomide/lenalidomide-based therapy: review of data from phase 3 trials and studies of novel combination regimens.
Fink, L; Tricot, G; Zangari, M; Zhan, F, 2011
)
1.37
"Bortezomib has demonstrated promising activity in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). "( Bortezomib ADDED to R-CVP is safe and effective for previously untreated advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: a phase II study by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Basi, S; Cantin, G; Chen, BE; Couban, S; Crump, M; Djurfeldt, M; Gascoyne, RD; Imrie, K; Lemieux, B; MacDonald, D; Rubin, S; Rubinger, M; Sehn, LH; Shepherd, L; Sussman, J, 2011
)
3.25
"Bortezomib has been reported to impair tumor growth by also inhibiting HIF-1α."( Bortezomib represses HIF-1α protein expression and nuclear accumulation by inhibiting both PI3K/Akt/TOR and MAPK pathways in prostate cancer cells.
Befani, CD; Bonanou, S; Hatzidaki, E; Liakos, P; Papandreou, CN; Patrikidou, A; Simos, G; Vlachostergios, PJ, 2012
)
2.54
"Bortezomib has become an important backbone of frontline myeloma treatment. "( Bortezomib for previously untreated multiple myeloma.
Delforge, M, 2011
)
3.25
"Bortezomib has potent chemo-/radio-sensitizing effects and can overcome traditional drug resistance in tumors when used in combination with potential chemotherapies."( Advances in the understanding of mechanisms and therapeutic use of bortezomib.
Dou, QP; Mujtaba, T, 2011
)
1.33
"Bortezomib has shown great promise in the treatment of amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. "( Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone therapy in AL amyloidosis is associated with high clonal response rates and prolonged progression-free survival.
Foard, D; Gibbs, SD; Gillmore, JD; Hawkins, PN; Lachmann, HJ; Lane, T; Pinney, JH; Rannigan, L; Venner, CP; Wechalekar, AD; Whelan, CJ, 2012
)
2.16
"Both bortezomib and metformin have been proposed as potential therapeutics in TSC."( Therapeutic trial of metformin and bortezomib in a mouse model of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC).
Auricchio, N; Kwiatkowski, DJ; Malinowska, I; Manning, BD; Shaw, R, 2012
)
1.11
"Bortezomib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) both alone and in combination with other agents; however, limited data exist regarding its toxicity in combination with common frontline therapies for indolent NHL. "( A phase 1 dose escalation study of bortezomib combined with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, modified vincristine, and prednisone for untreated follicular lymphoma and other low-grade B-cell lymphomas.
Bumpers, K; Flowers, CR; Heffner, LT; Hutchison-Rzepka, A; Kaufman, JL; Khoury, HJ; King, N; Lechowicz, MJ; Lewis, C; Lonial, S; Shenoy, PJ; Sinha, R; Tighiouart, M, 2012
)
2.1
"Bortezomib has also been incorporated into conditioning regimens before autologous stem cell transplantation, as well as into post-ASCT consolidation therapy, and in the maintenance setting."( Proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma: 10 years later.
Cavo, M; Harousseau, JL; Moreau, P; Orlowski, RZ; Palumbo, A; Richardson, PG; San Miguel, JF, 2012
)
1.1
"Bortezomib has subsequently been approved for multiple myeloma as a second-line treatment on its own and as a first-line therapy in combination with an alkylating agent and a corticosteroid."( Proteasome inhibitors.
Cvek, B, 2012
)
1.1
"Bortezomib has been used without much success in desensitization regimens, but we hypothesized that its use during induction may be helpful in targeting antibody production by long-lived plasma cells."( High immunologic risk living donor kidney transplant using bortezomib in a novel induction regimen without acute antibody mediated rejection.
Borja-Cacho, D; Chinnakotla, S; Dunn, TB; Finger, E; Kandaswamy, R; Kim, Y; Krefting, P; Manivel, C; Matas, A; Maurer, D; Noreen, H; Pruett, T; Tamayo, G; Verghese, P, 2011
)
1.33
"Bortezomib therapy has proven successful for the treatment of relapsed/refractory, relapsed, and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM); however, dose-limiting toxicities and the development of resistance limit its long-term utility. "( A small molecule inhibitor of ubiquitin-specific protease-7 induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells and overcomes bortezomib resistance.
Altun, M; Anderson, KC; Carrasco, R; Chauhan, D; Fulcinniti, M; Hideshima, T; Kessler, BM; Kingsbury, WD; Kodrasov, MP; Kumar, KG; Leach, CA; McDermott, JL; Minvielle, S; Munshi, N; Nicholson, B; Orlowski, R; Richardson, P; Shah, PK; Tian, Z; Weinstock, J; Zhou, B, 2012
)
2.03
"Bortezomib has been widely used in the treatment of various cancers; however, its exact mechanisms of action are not fully understood, particularly in acute T lymphoblast leukemia (T-ALL). "( Bortezomib suppresses the growth of leukemia cells with Notch1 overexpression in vivo and in vitro.
Cheng, H; Hu, X; Huang, C; Lü, S; Song, X; Wang, J; Wang, L; Yang, J, 2012
)
3.26
"Bortezomib has previously demonstrated activity in indolent lymphomas including follicular lymphoma with response rate ranging from 13% to 56%. "( Efficacy and toxicity of two schedules of bortezomib in patients with recurrent or refractory follicular lymphoma: a randomised phase II trial from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA).
Bosly, A; Bouabdallah, R; Boue, F; Bron, D; Casasnovas, O; Coiffier, B; Delarue, R; Feugier, P; Haioun, C; Offner, F; Ribrag, V; Tilly, H, 2013
)
2.1
"Bortezomib has demonstrated activity with manageable toxicity in a variety of hematologic malignancies in addition to MM, including leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma."( Proteasome inhibition in hematologic malignancies.
Anderson, K; Hideshima, T; Mitsiades, C; Richardson, PG, 2004
)
1.04
"Bortezomib has been studied extensively in vitro and in vivo, and anticancer activity has been seen in cell and animal models for several solid tumor types, including prostate cancer."( Bortezomib as a potential treatment for prostate cancer.
Logothetis, CJ; Papandreou, CN, 2004
)
2.49
"Bortezomib has recently shown significant preclinical and clinical activity in several cancers, confirming the therapeutic value of proteasome inhibition in human malignancy."( Proteasome inhibition as a novel therapeutic target in human cancer.
Anderson, KC; Hideshima, T; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG, 2005
)
1.05
"Bortezomib has been shown to be a substrate of several cytochrome P450 isoenzymes using in vitro systems."( Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and practical applications of bortezomib.
Davidson, T; Schwartz, R, 2004
)
1.29
"Bortezomib has minimal activity in soft tissue sarcoma as a single agent. "( A multicenter Phase II study of bortezomib in recurrent or metastatic sarcomas.
Antonescu, CR; Kraft, AS; Maki, RG; Scheu, K; Schwartz, GK; Wadler, S; Wright, JJ; Yamada, J, 2005
)
2.05
"Bortezomib therapy has set an outstanding example of translational research in the field of oncology."( Proteasome inhibitor therapy in multiple myeloma.
Anderson, KC; Chauhan, D; Hideshima, T; Mitsiades, C; Richardson, P, 2005
)
1.05
"Bortezomib has been investigated in combination with taxanes, gemcitabine, carboplatin, histone deactylase inhibitors, and other molecularly targeted agents in various NSCLC cell lines."( Preclinical data with bortezomib in lung cancer.
Schenkein, DP, 2005
)
1.36
"Bortezomib has demonstrated in vitro chemotherapy- and RT-sensitizing properties as well as single-agent activity in lung cancer."( The potential role of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy and radiation in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Edelman, MJ, 2005
)
1.36
"Bortezomib therapy has proven successful for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM); however, prolonged treatment is associated with toxicity and development of drug resistance. "( A novel orally active proteasome inhibitor induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells with mechanisms distinct from Bortezomib.
Anderson, KC; Berkers, C; Catley, L; Chao, TH; Chauhan, D; Hideshima, T; Letai, A; Li, G; Mitsiades, C; Mitsiades, N; Neuteboom, ST; Nicholson, B; Ovaa, H; Palladino, MA; Podar, K; Richardson, P; Velankar, M; Yasui, H, 2005
)
1.98
"Bortezomib has been found to inhibit AML blast survival."( Acute myelogenous leukemia--microenvironment interactions: role of endothelial cells and proteasome inhibition.
Abboud, CN; Bechelli, J; Lancet, JE; Liesveld, JL; Lu, C; Phillips, G; Rosell, KE, 2005
)
1.05
"Bortezomib has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma."( Marked clinical activity of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with follicular and mantle-cell lymphoma.
O'Connor, OA, 2005
)
1.3
"Bortezomib has demonstrated significant antitumor activity as a single agent in refractory and/or relapsed MM, with a significantly longer survival than with dexamethasone (1-year overall survival rate of 80% vs."( A practical update on the use of bortezomib in the management of multiple myeloma.
Bladé, J; Boccadoro, M; Cavenagh, J; Glasmacher, A; Jagannath, S; Lonial, S; Ludwig, H; Orlowski, RZ; San Miguel, J; Sonneveld, P, 2006
)
1.34
"Bortezomib has shown synergy with melphalan in preclinical models. "( Phase I/II trial assessing bortezomib and melphalan combination therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Adams, J; Berenson, JR; Jarutirasarn, SG; Lee, SP; Mapes, R; Morrison, B; Purner, M; Sadler, K; Schenkein, D; Swift, R; Vescio, RA; Wilson, J; Yang, HH, 2006
)
2.07
"Bortezomib has the potential to play a significant role throughout the NHL treatment algorithm in the future."( Proteasome inhibition with bortezomib: a new therapeutic strategy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Coleman, M; Furman, RR; Leonard, JP, 2006
)
1.35
"Bortezomib has been licensed to be used in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. "( Life-threatening motor neurotoxicity in association with bortezomib.
Devereux, S; Gupta, S; Mufti, GJ; Pagliuca, A; Schey, S, 2006
)
2.02
"Bortezomib has been reported to down-regulate cytokine-induced expression of VCAM-1, a major ligand on bone marrow stromal cells for VLA-4; it inhibits the heterotypic adherence between the myeloma cells and stromal cells and blocks the signalling pathways of resistance to apoptosis."( Bortezomib (Velcade)--a new therapeutic strategy for patients with refractory multiple myeloma.
Goranov, SE; Goranova-Marinova, VS, 2005
)
2.49
"Bortezomib has recently gained European Commission approval for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma on the basis of clinical trials demonstrating its efficacy, tolerability and superiority to high-dose dexamethasone."( Bortezomib for multiple myeloma.
Cavenagh, J; Joel, S; Oakervee, H; Popat, R, 2006
)
2.5
"Bortezomib has shown significant activity in trials of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma; approximately one third of patients have shown significant improvement with bortezomib monotherapy in phase II and III clinical trials."( Optimizing the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in relapsed multiple myeloma.
Colson, K; Jagannath, S; Richardson, P, 2006
)
1.33
"Bortezomib has modest single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced NSCLC using this schedule, with minor enhancement in combination with docetaxel. "( Randomized phase II study of bortezomib alone and bortezomib in combination with docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Akerley, W; Axelrod, R; Belt, R; Carbone, DP; Crawford, J; Fanucchi, MP; Fidias, P; Fossella, FV; Govindan, R; Kashala, O; Kelly, K; Limentani, SA; Natale, R; Raez, LE; Reimers, HJ; Ribeiro, M; Robert, F; Schiller, JH; Sheng, S, 2006
)
2.07
"Bortezomib has the boronic acid moiety which improves the specificity of proteasome inhibition and can be used as non-beta-lactam-based beta-lactamase inhibitors."( Pseudomembranous colitis following bortezomib therapy in a myeloma patient.
Kim, CC; Kim, M; Kim, Y; Lee, DG; Lee, JW; Lee, S; Min, CK; Min, WS; Moon, SJ; Park, G, 2007
)
1.34
"Bortezomib has efficacy in WM, but neurotoxicity can be dose limiting. "( Bortezomib is active in patients with untreated or relapsed Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: a phase II study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Chen, CI; Eisenhauer, E; Kouroukis, CT; Powers, J; Stadtmauer, E; Stewart, AK; Voralia, M; Walsh, W; White, D; Wright, JJ, 2007
)
3.23
"Bortezomib has many cutaneous side effects including erythematous plaques or nodules, a generalized morbilliform erythema with ulcerations and fever, purpuric eruptions, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, Sweet's syndrome, and folliculitis."( A review of deferasirox, bortezomib, dasatinib, and cyclosporine eye drops: possible uses and known side effects in cutaneous medicine.
Scheinfeld, N, 2007
)
1.36
"Bortezomib has minimal activity in patients with HRPC and is unlikely to make any impact on treatment efficacy."( Weekly docetaxel and bortezomib as first-line treatment for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial.
Barton, J; Gould, B; Greco, FA; Hainsworth, JD; Meluch, AA; Meng, C; Simons, L; Spigel, DR, 2007
)
1.38
"Bortezomib has no detectable effect on expression of TRAIL receptor DR4/DR5 in these two cell lines."( Bortezomib induces caspase-dependent apoptosis in Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines and is associated with reduced c-FLIP expression: a gene expression profiling study with implications for potential combination therapies.
Hsi, ED; Kung, J; Peng, X; Qiu, W; Yegappan, M; Yen-Lieberman, B; Zhao, X, 2008
)
2.51
"Bortezomib has been found to possess remarkable activity, especially in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, in relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed MM, as well as in patients presenting adverse prognostic factors."( New therapies in multiple myeloma.
Dammacco, F; Merchionne, F; Perosa, F, 2007
)
1.06
"Bortezomib has demonstrated significant anti-myeloma activity as a single agent in refractory/relapsed MM."( Bortezomib in multiple myeloma.
Mateos, MV; San Miguel, JF, 2007
)
2.5
"Bortezomib has been shown to exert inhibitory effects on NFkappaB activity."( Alkylating agents induce activation of NFkappaB in multiple myeloma cells.
Baumann, P; Mandl-Weber, S; Oduncu, F; Schmidmaier, R, 2008
)
1.07
"Bortezomib has been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma."( Proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cell lines derived from Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors and synergizes with TRAIL.
Chaudhary, PM; Lu, G; Punj, V, 2008
)
1.39
"Bortezomib has shown significant activity in myeloma. "( Bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone in advanced multiple myeloma.
Avonto, I; Boccadoro, M; Bringhen, S; Bruno, B; Callea, V; Caravita, T; Cascavilla, N; Falcone, A; Gay, F; Magarotto, V; Morabito, F; Musto, P; Palumbo, A; Pescosta, N; Ruggeri, M, 2008
)
3.23
"Bortezomib has profound effects on tumor cell growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis in human gastric cancer cells, suggesting that bortezomib may be an effective therapeutic drug for patients with gastric cancer."( Effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents in gastric cancer cell lines.
Bae, SH; Hyun, MS; Kim, MK; Lee, KH; Ryoo, HM; Sin, JI, 2008
)
1.34
"Bortezomib has presently become a significant rescue treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) due to its observed effectiveness and safety in multicenter trials. "( [Bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: results in a cohort of 39 patients].
Aguirre Errasti, C; Alonso Alonso, JJ; Barreiro García, JG; Cánovas Fernández, A, 2008
)
2.7
"Bortezomib has improved response rates, overall survival, and time to progression in relapsed or refractory disease, both as a single agent and as part of combination regimens. "( Bortezomib in multiple myeloma.
Dimopoulos, MA; Roussou, M; Terpos, E, 2008
)
3.23

Actions

Bortezomib was found to inhibit glioma growth and improved TMZ chemotherapy efficacy, probably via down-regulating the FOXM1-Survivin axis. The drug can inhibit the proliferation of HL-60 cells and reverse multidrug-resistance in the cells.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Bortezomib plays an important role in the treatment of MM."( Clinical Observation and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations of Original Research Drug and Generic Drug Bortezomib in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.
Chen, Z; Li, B; Liang, Y; Liu, A; Liu, L; Zhang, Y; Zhu, Y, 2022
)
1.66
"Bortezomib was found to inhibit glioma growth and improved TMZ chemotherapy efficacy, probably via down-regulating the FOXM1-Survivin axis. "( Bortezomib inhibits growth and sensitizes glioma to temozolomide (TMZ) via down-regulating the FOXM1-Survivin axis.
Chen, JX; Du, L; Huang, GH; Li, QR; Lv, SQ; Tang, JH; Xiang, Y; Xu, QF; Yang, L; Zhang, ZX; Zhou, Z; Zhu, LR, 2019
)
3.4
"Bortezomib could increase the apoptosis of U266 and RPMI8226 cells."( ANXA7 promotes the cell cycle, proliferation and cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance of multiple myeloma cells by up-regulating CDC5L.
Guo, D; Hong, L; Huang, H; Jiang, Y; Liu, H; Lu, L; Sha, Y; Zhang, C; Zhang, J, 2020
)
1.28
"Bortezomib exhibited a lower inhibitory capacity on the caspase- and trypsin-like activity of proteasomes from G/G individuals."( Proteasome Subunit Beta Type 1 P11A Polymorphism Is a New Prognostic Marker in Multiple Myeloma.
Andrikovics, H; Balassa, K; Homolya, L; Kiss, KP; Kosóczki, É; Kövy, P; Masszi, T; Meggyesi, N; Mikala, G; Szabó, E; Szombath, G; Tegze, B; Tordai, A; Varga, G, 2017
)
1.18
"A bortezomib-induced increase in density of TRPV1- and CGRP-immunoreactive innervation in the dorsal horn was also observed."( Bortezomib treatment produces nocifensive behavior and changes in the expression of TRPV1, CGRP, and substance P in the rat DRG, spinal cord, and sciatic nerve.
Boi, M; Carozzi, VA; Cavaletti, G; Chiorazzi, A; Del Fiacco, M; Dorsey, SG; Marmiroli, P; Melis, T; Meregalli, C; Picci, C; Poddighe, L; Quartu, M; Renn, CL; Serra, MP, 2014
)
2.4
"Bortezomib did not inhibit tripeptidyl peptidase 2 and only weakly inhibited cellular aminopeptidase activity, as did some of the other proteasome inhibitors."( Proteasome inhibitors alter levels of intracellular peptides in HEK293T and SH-SY5Y cells.
Castro, LM; Dasgupta, S; Dulman, R; Ferro, ES; Fricker, LD; Schmidt, M; Yang, C, 2014
)
1.12
"At a bortezomib dose lower than that in other combination therapy studies, antitumor activity was observed (phase 1)."( Phase 1/2 study of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (PD-0332991) with bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Badros, AZ; Chanan-Khan, AA; Chen-Kiang, S; Costa, LJ; Di Liberto, M; Ely, SA; Haideri, NA; Hess, G; Huang, X; Jayabalan, D; Jiang, Y; Kim, ST; Lentzsch, S; Niesvizky, R; Raab, MS; Randolph, S; Singhal, SB; Spicka, I; Stadtmauer, EA; Tarantolo, S; Vij, R; Yacoub, A; Zonder, JA, 2015
)
1.09
"Bortezomib can inhibit the proliferation of DCs in a dose- and time-dependent manner."( Bortezomib inhibits bone marrow-derived dendritic cells.
Liang, Y; Liu, H; Wang, Y; Wu, D; Zhang, Y, 2015
)
2.58
"Bortezomib could inhibit the proliferation of Jurkat and Raji cells and induce their apoptosis with time-and dose-dependent manner. "( [Effect of Bortezomib on Proliferation, Apoptosis and SHP-2 Gene Expression of Lymphoma Cells].
Jiang, LC; Luo, JM, 2015
)
2.25
"Bortezomib can inhibit the proliferation and induc the apoptosis of Jurkat and Raji cells obviously, upregulate the expression of SHP-2 mRNA, suggesting that the SHP-2 may participate in regulation of bortezomib induced apoptosis of Jurkat cells and Raji cells."( [Effect of Bortezomib on Proliferation, Apoptosis and SHP-2 Gene Expression of Lymphoma Cells].
Jiang, LC; Luo, JM, 2015
)
2.25
"Bortezomib-treated cells activate the cytoprotective heat shock response (HSR), including upregulation of heat shock proteins (HSPs)."( Bortezomib-induced heat shock response protects multiple myeloma cells and is activated by heat shock factor 1 serine 326 phosphorylation.
Bahlis, NJ; Boise, LH; Jaye, DL; Lonial, S; Nooka, AK; Shah, SP, 2016
)
2.6
"Bortezomib can increase the incidence of herpes zoster regardless of disease duration, previous treatments, and concomitantly administered drugs. "( Bortezomib and the increased incidence of herpes zoster in patients with multiple myeloma.
Do, YR; Joo, YD; Kim, BS; Kim, H; Kim, HJ; Kim, I; Kim, K; Kim, SJ; Kwon, JH; Lee, HJ; Lee, JH; Lee, NR; Lee, WS; Nam, SH; Shin, HJ; Sohn, SK; Suh, C; Won, JH; Yoon, SS, 2008
)
3.23
"Bortezomib can inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of HL-60/ADM cells and fresh refractory/relapse acute leukemia cells, especially combined with HT or As2O3."( [In vitro effect of bortezomib alone or in combination with harringtonine or arsenic trioxide on proliferation and apoptosis of multidrug resistant leukemia cells].
Cai, YX; Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2008
)
2.11
"Bortezomib might inhibit HL-60 cells adhension function by down-regulation of Pyk2 expression."( [The influence of bortezomib on HL-60 cell function induced by all-trans retinoic acid plus bufalin and its mechanism].
Liu, YP; Ma, YJ; Qu, XJ, 2008
)
1.4
"Bortezomib did not increase hematologic toxicity."( Bortezomib and high-dose melphalan as conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with de novo multiple myeloma: a phase 2 study of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome (IFM).
Araujo, C; Attal, M; Avet-Loiseau, H; Caillot, D; Danho, C; Dib, M; Dorvaux, V; Fruchart, C; Garderet, L; Harousseau, JL; Hulin, C; Huynh, A; Kolb, B; Lenain, P; Marit, G; Mary, JY; Mathiot, C; Moreau, P; Pégourié, B; Randriamalala, E; Roussel, M; Royer, B; Stoppa, AM, 2010
)
2.52
"Bortezomib can inhibit migration of endothelial cell HMEC-1 by downregulating the expression of VEGF and Annexin A2, displaying a new mechanism of bortezomib for inhibition of tumor proliferation."( [The effect of bortezomib on migration of endothelial cells and angiogenesis].
Jiang, M; Ruan, CG; Xie, LQ; Xue, LX, 2010
)
2.16
"Bortezomib can inhibit the proliferation of K562 cells, and induce apoptosis by down-regulating the expression of XIAP, providing the laboratory evidence for the targeted therapy in acute leukemia."( [Effect of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib on proliferation, apoptosis and XIAP expression in K562 cells].
Chen, SM; Cui, XY; Han, XF; Ling, Z; Shao, M; Sun, L; Wang, F; Zhang, H, 2011
)
2.1
"Bortezomib caused an increase in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and treatment with the ROS scavenger NAC inhibited phosphorylation of ATM leading to a decrease in the number of cells in G2-M phase."( Bortezomib induces G2-M arrest in human colon cancer cells through ROS-inducible phosphorylation of ATM-CHK1.
Heo, DS; Hong, SW; Hong, YS; Jin, DH; Kim, KP; Kim, SM; Kim, TW; Lee, JL; Lee, JS; Shin, JS; Yoon, DH, 2012
)
2.54
"Bortezomib can inhibit the proliferation of HL-60 cells and reverse multidrug-resistance in the cells. "( [Proliferation-inhibiting and multidrug-resistant reversing effect of bortezomib on human HL-60 cells].
Chen, WM; Chen, ZZ; Shang, J; Wei, TN; Wu, WB, 2012
)
2.06
"Bortezomib could inhibit the degradation of IkappaBalpha in ATL cells, resulting in suppression of NF-kappaB and induction of cell death in ATL cells in vitro."( Proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, potently inhibits the growth of adult T-cell leukemia cells both in vivo and in vitro.
Koya, Y; Matsuoka, M; Nosaka, K; Satou, Y; Toyokuni, S; Yasunaga, JI, 2004
)
1.36
"Bortezomib can cause a predominately sensory axonal polyneuropathy. "( An electrodiagnostic evaluation of the effect of pre-existing peripheral nervous system disorders in patients treated with the novel proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.
Esseltine, D; MacGregor-Cortelli, B; Muzzy, J; O'Connor, OA; Schenkein, D; Scher, H; Slovin, S; Stubblefield, MD; Wright, J, 2006
)
1.97
"Bortezomib did not inhibit expression of several other antiapoptotic proteins, including Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL."( Bortezomib induces apoptosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B cells and prolongs survival of mice inoculated with EBV-transformed B cells.
Cohen, JI; Kawada, J; Pesnicak, L; Zou, P, 2007
)
2.5

Treatment

Bortezomib-based treatment might benefit the PFS for patients with 3 copies but could not improve the adverse effect of 4 copies. 1q21+ was an independent risk factor for inferior PFS and OS in multivariate analysis.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Bortezomib, used for the treatment of multiple myeloma, has been reported to induce potent neurotoxicity. "( Inhibition of Neurotoxicity/Anticancer Activity of Bortezomib by Caffeic Acid and Chlorogenic Acid.
Amano, S; Iijima, Y; Matsuda, R; Oishi, Y; Sakagami, H; Sano, M; Takeshima, H; Tamura, N; Uesawa, Y, 2022
)
2.42
"Bortezomib-based treatment might benefit the PFS for patients with 3 copies but could not improve the adverse effect of ≥ 4 copies. 1q21+ was an independent risk factor for inferior PFS and OS in multivariate analysis (P < .001 and P = .028)."( The Importance of FISH Signal Cut-off Value and Copy Number Variation for 1q21 in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Is it Underestimated?
Feng, L; Gao, L; Huang, X; Lai, Y; Li, Y; Liu, Y; Lu, J; Wang, F; Wang, Z; Wen, L, 2022
)
1.44
"Bortezomib treatment may adversely affect ovarian function by accelerating ovarian reserve depletion and changing ERα and PR hormone levels that can cause fertility problems in the long term."( Bortezomib-Induced Ovarian Toxicity in Mice.
Monsef, YA; Mutluay, D; Tenekeci, GY, 2022
)
2.89
"Bortezomib treatment resulted in significantly higher reporting odds ratios (RORs) for cardiac failure, cardiac failure congestive, and atrial fibrillation. "( Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors.
Endo, M; Fujiwara, M; Goto, M; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M, 2023
)
2.35
"Bortezomib-containing treatment regimens were more frequently associated with TLS events than were other multiple myeloma treatment regimens (cytotoxic chemotherapy, lenalidomide, and thalidomide)."( Tumor lysis syndrome associated with bortezomib: A post-hoc analysis after signal detection using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Hotta, Y; Kimura, K; Kondo, M; Nishikawa, R; Sanagawa, A; Tohkin, M, 2020
)
1.55
"In bortezomib retreatment, overall response rate was 34.5%, median progression-free survival was 7.8 months (95% CI: 6.7-8.9), median duration of response was 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.0-13.0) and median overall survival was 20.3 months (95% CI: 17.9-22.7)."( Bortezomib retreatment is effective in relapsed multiple myeloma patients - real-life clinical practice data.
Brozova, L; Gregora, E; Hajek, R; Jelinek, T; Jungova, A; Maisnar, V; Minarik, J; Pour, L; Sevcikova, S; Spicka, I; Stork, M; Velichova, R, 2020
)
2.51
"Bortezomib-based treatment in the real world setting still carries a high risk of toxicity in the elderly population."( Bortezomib use and outcomes for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Hollingworth, S; Loke, C; McPherson, I; Mollee, P; Mutsando, H; Tomlinson, R; Walpole, E; Weston, H; Wong, P; Yue, M, 2020
)
2.72
"2509 bortezomib-treated patients and 1445 patients in non-bortezomib-based control arms were included."( A retrospective analysis of 3954 patients in phase 2/3 trials of bortezomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma: towards providing a benchmark for the cardiac safety profile of proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma.
Anderson, KC; Desai, A; Dow, E; Elliott, J; Esseltine, DL; Faber, EA; Feng, H; Francis, SA; Jobanputra, N; Laubach, JP; Lonial, S; Marquez, L; Mateos, MV; Moreau, P; Moslehi, JJ; Niculescu, L; Orlowski, RZ; Richardson, PG; Rosiñol, L; San Miguel, JF; Shi, H; Sonneveld, P; van de Velde, H; Voorhees, P, 2017
)
1.15
"Bortezomib treatment markedly increased the baseline frequency of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs), which was completely normalized by the NMDAR antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5)."( Bortezomib induces neuropathic pain through protein kinase C-mediated activation of presynaptic NMDA receptors in the spinal cord.
Chen, H; Chen, SR; Pan, HL; Xie, JD, 2017
)
2.62
"BV6/Bortezomib co-treatment primarily triggers necroptosis or, alternatively, engages both apoptotic and necroptotic cell death."( Identification of a synergistic combination of Smac mimetic and Bortezomib to trigger cell death in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma cells.
Abhari, BA; Bhatti, IA; Fulda, S, 2017
)
1.17
"Bortezomib treatment is effective in MM, but can be complicated with neurological side effects."( Bortezomib-Induced Muscle Toxicity in Multiple Myeloma.
Guglielmi, V; Malatesta, M; Manganotti, P; Marini, M; Meneghini, V; Nowis, D; Paoli, L; Sadowski, R; Tinelli, M; Tomelleri, G; Vattemi, G; Wilczynski, GM, 2017
)
2.62
"The bortezomib-treated group showed a complete dentin bridge with very few irregular tubules after 42 days."( Bortezomib Facilitates Reparative Dentin Formation after Pulp Access Cavity Preparation in Mouse Molar.
An, CH; An, SY; Gwon, GJ; Ha, JH; Jung, JK; Kim, JY; Kim, KR; Kwon, TY; Lee, Y; Neupane, S; Sohn, WJ, 2017
)
2.38
"Bortezomib-based treatment can not improve the poor survival in patients with 1q21 amplification."( [Prognostic Impact of 1q21 Amplification in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Bortezomib-Based First-Line Treatment].
Deng, P; Li, F; Li, P; Wei, YL; Zhou, YL, 2017
)
1.39
"Bortezomib treatment significantly lowered the percentage of bone marrow plasma cells in SLE mice."( Plasma Cell Depletion Attenuates Hypertension in an Experimental Model of Autoimmune Disease.
Barati, MT; Powell, DW; Ryan, MJ; Taylor, EB; Turbeville, HR, 2018
)
1.2
"Bortezomib-based treatment was successful in reverting plasma cell-rich acute rejection and stabilizing graft function, with graft survival of 90% at 2 years. "( Management of Plasma Cell-Rich Acute Rejection in Living-Related Kidney Transplant: Role of Proteasome Inhibitor.
Abbas, K; Aziz, T; Imam, M; Mubarak, M; Musharraf, W; Rizvi, AH; Zafar, MN, 2019
)
1.96
"BD: bortezomib/doxorubicin treatment; CDK: cyclin-dependent kinases; CHCA: α-cyanohydroxycinnamic acid; IDP: intrinsically disordered proteins; IDR: intrinsically disordered regions; IPG: immobilized pI gradient; MALDI TOF/TOF: matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight tandem mass-spectrometry; MM: multiple myeloma; ODC: ornithine decarboxylase; PI: proteasomal inhibitors; PSMA: alpha-type 20S proteasome subunits; PTMs: post-translational modifications; SDS-PAGE: sodium dodecylsulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; UIP: ubiquitin-independent proteasomal proteolysis."( Combined treatment of human multiple myeloma cells with bortezomib and doxorubicin alters the interactome of 20S proteasomes.
Barlev, NA; Fedorova, OA; Gorbach, DP; Kuzyk, VO; Mittenberg, AG; Shabelnikov, SV; Shatrova, AN, 2018
)
1.29
"Bortezomib is standard treatment in AL amyloidosis (AL), but is contraindicated in patients with significant neuropathy. "( Carfilzomib is an effective upfront treatment in AL amyloidosis patients with peripheral and autonomic neuropathy.
Cheesman, S; Gillmore, JD; Hawkins, PN; Kyriakou, C; Lachmann, HJ; Mahmood, S; Manwani, R; Popat, R; Rabin, N; Sachchithanantham, S; Shah, R; Sharpley, F; Smith, M; Wechalekar, AD; Worthington, S; Yong, K, 2019
)
1.96
"ST80/Bortezomib cotreatment upregulates BAG3 mRNA and protein levels in surviving cells in addition to triggering the accumulation of insoluble protein aggregates."( BAG3 induction is required to mitigate proteotoxicity via selective autophagy following inhibition of constitutive protein degradation pathways.
Fulda, S; Jung, M; Rapino, F, 2014
)
0.86
"Bortezomib based treatment is a highly effective and safe option in MM patients with impaired renal function."( [Clinical feature and efficacy of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment treated with bortezomib based chemotherapy].
An, G; Deng, SH; Feng, XY; Hao, M; Li, F; Qiu, LG; Sui, WW; Wang, YF; Xu, Y, 2013
)
1.33
"Bortezomib retreatment regimen is demonstrated a higher response rate in patients who achieved deeper response in initial treatment, with no more adverse events."( [The efficacy and safety analysis of bortezomib retreatment in 76 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma].
Du, J; Fan, JL; Fu, WJ; Hou, J; Jiang, H; Jin, LN; Lan, HF; Lu, J; Yuan, ZG; Zeng, TM; Zhang, CY; Zhou, F; Zhou, LL, 2013
)
2.11
"Bortezomib-treated D307H mice had lower CPVT prevalence and less premature ventricular beats during peak exercise."( The role of mutant protein level in autosomal recessive catecholamine dependent polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT2).
Afek, A; Arad, M; Aravot, D; El-Ani, D; Eldar, M; Hochhauser, E; Issac, A; Katz, G; Kurtzwald-Josefson, E; Seidman, CE; Seidman, JG; Shainberg, A, 2013
)
1.11
"Bortezomib treatment was repeated, and no pulmonary adverse reactions occurred."( Development of acute pulmonary hypertension after bortezomib treatment in a patient with multiple myeloma: a case report and the review of the literature.
Akosman, C; Eroglu, E; Ordu, C; Oyan, B,
)
1.11
"Bortezomib treatment requires four visits to a chemotherapy unit in each 21-day cycle. "( Authorising bortezomib treatment prior to reviewing haematology results: a step toward home administration.
Cain, R; Waight, CC, 2014
)
2.22
"Bortezomib plus 2ME treatment induces a higher level of cell death compared with treatment with bortezomib alone and increases mitochondrial ROS and Ca(2+) levels in KMS20 cells."( Combination treatment with 2-methoxyestradiol overcomes bortezomib resistance of multiple myeloma cells.
Han, J; Heo, HJ; Jeong, SH; Jeong, YJ; Kim, HK; Kim, N; Ko, KS; Ko, TH; Lee, SR; Rhee, BD; Song, IS; Youm, JB, 2013
)
1.36
"Bortezomib treatment also resulted in decreased histone H3 and H4 acetylation and decreased occupancy of histone acetyltransferase, p300."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib induces an inhibitory chromatin environment at a distal enhancer of the estrogen receptor-α gene.
Alarid, ET; Bickford, B; Powers, GL; Rajbhandari, P; Solodin, NM, 2013
)
1.41
"Bortezomib treatment after dendritic cell (DC) activation resulted in drastically elevated IL-1β production, whereas bortezomib treatment before DC activation inhibited IL-1β production, suggesting that the timing of bortezomib administration significantly affected IL-1β production by DCs."( IL-1β and TLR4 signaling are involved in the aggravated murine acute graft-versus-host disease caused by delayed bortezomib administration.
Cheng, Q; Jin, Y; Liang, Y; Liu, H; Ma, S; Wang, Y; Wu, D; Wu, Y; Zhang, Y; Zheng, D, 2014
)
1.33
"Bortezomib treatment reduced the expression of YKL-40 and MMP to basal levels."( Protective role of bortezomib in steatotic liver ischemia/reperfusion injury through abrogation of MMP activation and YKL-40 expression.
Anderson, CD; Busch, RA; Chapman, WC; Dines, JN; Gunter, KL; Jia, J; Knolhoff, BL; Mohanakumar, T; Ramachandran, S; Sarma, NJ; Tiriveedhi, V; Upadhya, GA, 2014
)
1.45
"Bortezomib, a current treatment option, inhibits angiogenesis by proteasome inhibition and is known to be effective in the treatment of MM."( Acupuncture for neuropathic pain due to bortezomib in a patient with multiple myeloma.
Aylı, M; Cevik, C; Mandıroğlu, S, 2014
)
1.39
"Bortezomib treatment induced ER stress, evident by strong induction of Grp78, CHOP, PERK, and IRE1α (Western blot analysis) and the UPR (induction of hsp40, 70, and 90)."( Bortezomib-induced unfolded protein response increases oncolytic HSV-1 replication resulting in synergistic antitumor effects.
Bailey, Z; Bolyard, C; Caligiuri, MA; Cripe, TP; Eaves, D; He, S; Hurwitz, BS; Kaur, B; Old, M; Parris, DS; Rath, KS; Selvendiran, K; Yoo, JY; Yu, J; Yu, JG; Zhang, J, 2014
)
2.57
"Bortezomib treatment causes long-term gonadal dysfunction in male mice. "( Bortezomib treatment causes long-term testicular dysfunction in young male mice.
Eriksson, E; Hou, M; Jahnukainen, K; Meinhardt, A; Sävendahl, L; Söder, O; Svechnikov, K, 2014
)
3.29
"Bortezomib treatment, chemotherapy, International Staging System (ISS) stage I, and better performance status significantly correlated with survival benefit."( The treatment outcome of multiple myeloma patients ineligible for hematopoietic transplantation--a single institutional experience in Taiwan.
Chang, PY; Chao, TY; Chen, JH; Chen, YC; Dai, MS; Ho, CL; Huang, TC; Kao, WY; Wu, YY, 2015
)
1.14
"Bortezomib treatment induced a progressively increasing hyperalgesia in rat which was accompanied by a significant reduction in sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV)."( Spinal administration of mGluR5 antagonist prevents the onset of bortezomib induced neuropathic pain in rat.
Bianchi, E; Cerretani, D; Ghelardini, C; Menicacci, C, 2014
)
1.36
"Bortezomib pretreatment induced NOXA expression and downregulated c-FLIP, neither of which caused the TRAIL-sensitizing effect."( Bortezomib sensitizes primary meningioma cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by enhancing formation of the death-inducing signaling complex.
Bauer, M; Boehm, C; Ganten, TM; Haas, TL; Holland, H; Keller, M; Koschny, R; Koschny, T; Krupp, W; Meixensberger, J; Mueller, WC; Sinn, P; Sprick, MR; Walczak, H; Xu, LX, 2014
)
2.57
"Bortezomib treatment of myeloma cells lead to ATG5 cleavage through a calpain-dependent manner while calpain inhibition or a calpain-insensitive Atg5 mutant promoted bortezomib-resistance."( Bortezomib induces AMPK-dependent autophagosome formation uncoupled from apoptosis in drug resistant cells.
Driscoll, JJ; Jaganathan, S; Malek, E; Vallabhapurapu, S, 2014
)
2.57
"Bortezomib retreatment provided a similar depth and time to response as first-line therapy; however, as could be expected, the duration of response was shorter with retreatment. "( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib-based retreatment at the first relapse in multiple myeloma patients: A retrospective study.
Angermund, R; Corso, A; Couturier, C; Giraldo, P; Kotsianidis, I; Olie, R; Oriol, A, 2015
)
2.17
"Bortezomib treatment did not cause any increase in nuclear foci containing phosphorylated histone H2AX, and knockdown of BRCA2 did not entail sensitivity to bortezomib, suggesting that the DNA repair function of BRCA1 may not be directly involved."( Suppression of BRCA1 sensitizes cells to proteasome inhibitors.
Bouwman, P; Greco, D; Gu, Y; Jonkers, J; Kuznetsov, SG; Saarela, J; Yadav, B, 2014
)
1.12
"Bortezomib treatment led to GRP78 co-localization with proteotoxic protein aggregates, known as aggresomes."( Molecular chaperone GRP78 enhances aggresome delivery to autophagosomes to promote drug resistance in multiple myeloma.
Abd El-Azeem, HG; Abdel Malek, MA; Driscoll, JJ; Elgammal, SA; Jagannathan, S; Malek, E; Sayed, DM; Thabet, NM, 2015
)
1.14
"ST80/Bortezomib cotreatment upregulates mRNA and protein expression of NIK, which is accompanied by an initial increase in histone H3 acetylation."( NIK is required for NF-κB-mediated induction of BAG3 upon inhibition of constitutive protein degradation pathways.
Abhari, BA; Fulda, S; Jung, M; Rapino, F, 2015
)
0.87
"Bortezomib treatment has shown upregulated DIABLO and NF-κBIB (a NF-κB inhibitor) and downregulated NF-κB1, NF-κB2, and BIRC1 gene expressions. "( Bortezomib and Arsenic Trioxide Activity on a Myelodysplastic Cell Line (P39): A Gene Expression Study.
Canesastraro, M; Di Raimondo, F; Galimberti, S; Nagy, B; Palumbo, G; Petrini, M; Savlı, H; Sünnetçi, D, 2015
)
3.3
"Bortezomib treatment did not affect the nuclear/cytoplasmic distribution of the non-structural S-segment protein (NSs); however, the ability of NSs to form nuclear filaments was abolished as a result of Bortezomib treatment."( Characterizing the effect of Bortezomib on Rift Valley Fever Virus multiplication.
Amaya, M; Bailey, C; Keck, F; Kehn-Hall, K; Narayanan, A; Roberts, B, 2015
)
1.43
"Bortezomib rescue treatment was administered after a 42-year-old woman failed to respond to steroid pulse and plasmapheresis with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)."( Treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection using bortezomib: a case report.
Kim, JK; Kim, SM; Kim, YJ; Lee, JH; Oh, JS; Sin, YH, 2015
)
1.39
"Bortezomib-based treatment resulted in a strong decrease of renal deposits."( A mouse model recapitulating human monoclonal heavy chain deposition disease evidences the relevance of proteasome inhibitor therapy.
Bender, S; Bonaud, A; Bridoux, F; Cogné, M; Delpy, L; Druilhe, A; Javaugue, V; Lacombe, C; Oblet, C; Quellard, N; Sirac, C; Srour, N; Touchard, G, 2015
)
1.14
"Bortezomib treatment inhibited proteasome activities and increased ubiquitin-protein conjugates after sham and burn injury."( Proteasome Inhibition After Burn Injury.
Gamelli, RL; Kennedy, RH; LaPorte, HM; Majetschak, M; Vana, PG; Wong, YM,
)
0.85
"Bortezomib treatment activated apoptosis, evidenced by increased expression of cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP in both HeLa cells and CaSki cells. "( Endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy participate in apoptosis induced by bortezomib in cervical cancer cells.
Bai, C; Gao, L; Lu, D; Wu, X; Zhang, W; Zhang, Y, 2016
)
2.1
"The bortezomib treatment of leukemic (HEL) and gastric cancer cells (BGC-823) led to significant inhibition of hTERT and telomerase expression, widespread dysregulation of shelterin protein expression, and telomere shortening, thereby triggering telomere dysfunction and DNA damage."( Bortezomib-mediated down-regulation of telomerase and disruption of telomere homeostasis contributes to apoptosis of malignant cells.
Björkholm, M; Ci, X; Jia, J; Kong, F; Li, B; Ma, X; Xu, D; Zheng, C, 2015
)
2.34
"Bortezomib treatment significantly reduced VZV-specific CMI, and high baseline SFC counts in patients receiving this treatment without acyclovir prophylaxis were associated with a significantly increased risk for herpes zoster."( Varicella-zoster virus-specific cell-mediated immunity and herpes zoster development in multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib- or thalidomide-based chemotherapy.
Choe, PG; Kim, BS; Kim, I; Kim, JW; Koh, Y; Kwon, JH; Min, CK; Mun, YC; Nam, SH; Park, WB; Park, Y, 2015
)
2.07
"Bortezomib/CX-4945 treatment inhibited NF-κB signaling in T-ALL cell lines and primary cells from T-ALL patients, but, intriguingly, in B-ALL cells the drug combination activated NF-κB p65 pro-apoptotic functions."( Synergistic cytotoxic effects of bortezomib and CK2 inhibitor CX-4945 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: turning off the prosurvival ER chaperone BIP/Grp78 and turning on the pro-apoptotic NF-κB.
Bertacchini, J; Bertaina, A; Buontempo, F; Cappellini, A; Chiarini, F; Evangelisti, C; Locatelli, F; Lonetti, A; Martelli, AM; McCubrey, JA; Melchionda, F; Neri, LM; Orsini, E; Pession, A, 2016
)
1.44
"Bortezomib effectively treated antibody-mediated renal transplantation rejection in this case study, but clinical trials with large sample sizes are still needed to explore clinical safety and tolerability."( Bortezomib-based treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection: a case report.
Cai, M; Chen, CQ; Han, Y; Li, XL; Li, ZL; Shi, BY; Wang, Q; Xu, XG; Zhang, X; Zhang, ZM; Zhou, WQ, 2015
)
2.58
"Bortezomib-treated patients were identified from consecutive cases managed at two UK referral centres."( Bortezomib in the treatment of refractory thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.
Blombery, PA; Cranfield, T; Dutt, T; McGuckin, S; Patriquin, CJ; Scully, M; Thomas, MR; Westwood, JP, 2016
)
2.6
"Bortezomib-treated cells activate the cytoprotective heat shock response (HSR), including upregulation of heat shock proteins (HSPs)."( Bortezomib-induced heat shock response protects multiple myeloma cells and is activated by heat shock factor 1 serine 326 phosphorylation.
Bahlis, NJ; Boise, LH; Jaye, DL; Lonial, S; Nooka, AK; Shah, SP, 2016
)
2.6
"Bortezomib treatment of HMECS induced dose- and time-dependent expression of HO-1 and COX-2 mRNA and protein, and triggered nuclear translocation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related transcription factor (Nrf2)."( Bortezomib Effects on Human Microvascular Endothelium in vitro.
Sahni, A; Sahni, SK; Shah, R; Thomasson, ED, 2016
)
2.6
"Bortezomib treatment showed clinical improvement or disease remission, which was accompanied by a partial NMDAR antibody titer decline in 4 of 5 patients. "( Bortezomib for treatment of therapy-refractory anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.
Alexander, T; Hiepe, F; Kohler, S; Köhnlein, M; Meisel, A; Mengel, AM; Nümann, A; Prüss, H; Ruprecht, K; Scheibe, F, 2017
)
3.34
"In bortezomib-treated 4T1HA tumor-bearing mice, CD4+T-cells showed increased IL-2 production, CD11c+ dendritic cells showed increased IL-12 and IL-15 production, and HA-specific activated CD8+T-cells showed enhanced expression of IFNγ, granzyme-B and transcription factor eomesodermin."( Bortezomib augments lymphocyte stimulatory cytokine signaling in the tumor microenvironment to sustain CD8+T cell antitumor function.
Dudimah, DF; Pellom, ST; Richmond, A; Shanker, A; Singhal, A; Thounaojam, MC; Uzhachenko, RV, 2017
)
2.41
"Bortezomib treatment given intravenously twice weekly for 1 month (1.3 mg/m"( Humoral Compensation after Bortezomib Treatment of Allosensitized Recipients.
Burghuber, C; Gibby, A; Hong, JJ; Iwakoshi, N; Knechtle, S; Kwun, J; Manook, M, 2017
)
1.47
"Bortezomib treatment inhibited hepatoma cell growth with IC(50) values between 2.4 and 7.7 nmol/L. "( Direct and natural killer cell-mediated antitumor effects of low-dose bortezomib in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Armeanu, S; Baltz, KM; Bitzer, M; Krusch, M; Lauer, UM; Salih, HR; Smirnow, I; Steinle, A; Weiss, TS, 2008
)
2.02
"Bortezomib treatment significantly enhanced apoptosis with inhibition of nuclear RELA in three of four tumors, but other NF-kappaB subunits, ERK1/2, and STAT3 were variably or not affected, and tumor progression was observed within 3 months."( Bortezomib-induced apoptosis with limited clinical response is accompanied by inhibition of canonical but not alternative nuclear factor-{kappa}B subunits in head and neck cancer.
Allen, C; Arun, P; Chen, Z; Nottingham, L; Saigal, K; Van Waes, C, 2008
)
2.51
"Bortezomib-treated animals showed significantly higher tumor burden compared with gemcitabine-treated and control animals, although bortezomib was locally active and induced a decrease of proteasome activity, which was most pronounced following the simultaneous administration of gemcitabine."( Bortezomib is ineffective in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Märten, A; Mehrle, S; Schmidt, J; Serba, S; von Lilienfeld-Toal, M; Zeiss, N, 2008
)
2.51
"Bortezomib treatment did not significantly alter plasma membrane amount of DR4 and DR5 but increased Apo2L/TRAIL-induced caspase-8 and caspase-3 activation."( Cooperation between Apo2L/TRAIL and bortezomib in multiple myeloma apoptosis.
Anel, A; Balsas, P; Galán-Malo, P; López-Royuela, N; Marzo, I; Naval, J, 2009
)
1.35
"Bortezomib treatment increases the intracellular levels of several important apoptosis regulators that may mediate enhanced sensitivity to mapatumumab and lexatumumab."( Mapatumumab and lexatumumab induce apoptosis in TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 antibody-resistant NSCLC cell lines when treated in combination with bortezomib.
Carrell, JA; Humphreys, R; Luster, TA; McCormick, K; Sun, D, 2009
)
1.28
"In bortezomib-treated HL-60/ADM cells, the proliferation inhibition rate and apoptotic cells increased in a time- and dose-dependent manner. "( [In vitro effect of bortezomib alone or in combination with harringtonine or arsenic trioxide on proliferation and apoptosis of multidrug resistant leukemia cells].
Cai, YX; Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2008
)
1.29
"Bortezomib treatment induced an earlier improvement in sciatic functional index and a more rapid restoration of contractile force and wet weight of extensor digitorum longus muscle. "( Proteasome inhibition promotes functional recovery after peripheral nerve reperfusion injury.
Jang, HS; Kim, KM; Oh, KJ; Park, JW; Rhyu, IJ, 2009
)
1.8
"Bortezomib treatment elicited substantial reduction in both donor-specific antibody (DSA) and non-DSA levels. "( Abrogation of anti-HLA antibodies via proteasome inhibition.
Dave, SD; Everly, MJ; Feroz, A; Idica, AK; Kaneku, H; Khemchandani, SI; Modi, PR; Shankar, V; Terasaki, PI; Trivedi, HL; Trivedi, VB; Vanikar, AV, 2009
)
1.8
"Bortezomib pre-treatment significantly reduced the pancreatic weight/body weight ratio, and improved the histology by decreasing the extent of vacuolization and infiltration."( Simultaneous proteosome inhibition and heat shock protein induction by bortezomib is beneficial in experimental pancreatitis.
Biczó, G; Halm, G; Rakonczay, Z; Szabolcs, A; Takács, T; Tiszlavicz, L; Wittmann, T, 2009
)
1.31
"Bortezomib treatment was generally well tolerated."( Single-agent bortezomib in previously untreated multiple myeloma: efficacy, characterization of peripheral neuropathy, and molecular correlations with response and neuropathy.
Amato, AA; Anderson, KC; Avigan, DE; Briemberg, HR; Chanan-Khan, AA; Doss, D; Esseltine, DL; Hassoun, H; Heffner, LT; Kesari, S; Kuter, DJ; Lonial, S; Mitsiades, C; Munshi, NC; Oaklander, AL; Richardson, PG; Schlossman, RL; Weller, E; Wen, PY; Xie, W, 2009
)
1.44
"Bortezomib treatment of EOC cells causes apoptosis by involving mitochondrial pathway, activation of caspases and downregulation of XIAP, and survivin."( Bortezomib-mediated expression of p27Kip1 through S-phase kinase protein 2 degradation in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Ahmed, M; Al-Dayel, F; Al-Kuraya, KS; Bavi, P; Hussain, AR; Jehan, Z; Munkarah, A; Uddin, S, 2009
)
2.52
"Bortezomib treatment led to inhibition of BCR-ABL-induced suppression of FoxO proteins and their proapoptotic targets, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and BIM, thereby providing novel insights into the molecular effects of proteasome inhibitor therapy."( Proteasome inhibition causes regression of leukemia and abrogates BCR-ABL-induced evasion of apoptosis in part through regulation of forkhead tumor suppressors.
Dewar, MR; Ghaffari, S; Grassian, A; Jagani, Z; Khosravi-Far, R; Kutok, JL; Melet, A; Miller, K; Ren, R; Rodin, HY; Santos, T; Song, K; Wu, C; Yeckes-Rodin, H, 2009
)
1.07
"Bortezomib treatment caused a reduced expansion of CD8(+) T lymphocytes and increased viral titers in LCMV-infected mice."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhances the susceptibility to viral infection.
Basler, M; Beck, U; Groettrup, M; Lauer, C, 2009
)
1.38
"Bortezomib treatment resulted in promoter-specific changes in estrogen-induced gene transcription that related with occupancy of ERalpha and RNA polymerase II (PolII) on endogenous promoters."( Proteasome inhibition represses ERalpha gene expression in ER+ cells: a new link between proteasome activity and estrogen signaling in breast cancer.
Alarid, ET; Casa, AJ; Ellison-Zelski, SJ; Lee, AV; Powers, GL, 2010
)
1.08
"Bortezomib treatment was administered during this period and therapeutic response was assessed using cerebellar volumes at the end of treatment."( Functional evaluation of therapeutic response for a mouse model of medulloblastoma.
Duong, TQ; Jung, I; Keller, C; Kilcoyne, A; Lin, AL; Morgan, WW; Nelon, LD; Nowak, BM; Ohshima-Hosoyama, S; Prajapati, SI; Rubin, BP; Samano, AK; Taniguchi, E; Togao, O; Whitney, TG, 2010
)
1.08
"Bortezomib treatment did not significantly decrease DSA MFI within the 150-day posttreatment period in any patient."( Bortezomib as the sole post-renal transplantation desensitization agent does not decrease donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies.
Anglicheau, D; Candon, S; Hermine, O; Legendre, C; Leruez, M; Loupy, A; Martinez, F; Nochy, D; Pallet, N; Rabant, M; Sberro-Soussan, R; Snanoudj, R; Suberbielle-Boissel, C; Thervet, E; Zuber, J, 2010
)
2.52
"Bortezomib treatment of immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice bearing LLC-induced subcutaneous tumors and MPEs significantly blocked tumor-specific NF-kappaB activation."( Specific effects of bortezomib against experimental malignant pleural effusion: a preclinical study.
Blackwell, TS; Kalomenidis, I; Karabela, SP; Kollintza, A; Magkouta, S; Moschos, C; Psallidas, I; Roussos, C; Sherrill, TP; Stathopoulos, GT; Theodoropoulou, P, 2010
)
1.41
"Bortezomib treatment exhibited greater sensitivities in Huh7 and SNU886 cells (epithelial type) than SK-Hep1 and SNU449 cells (mesenchymal type) that exhibited higher levels of G(alpha)(12/13)."( G(alpha)12/13 inhibition enhances the anticancer effect of bortezomib through PSMB5 downregulation.
Dhanasekaran, DN; Ha, JH; Jayaraman, M; Kim, SG; Kwak, MK; Lee, CH; Lee, S; Nam, CW; Yang, YM, 2010
)
1.33
"Bortezomib treatment did not significantly decrease DSA MFI within the 270-day post-treatment period in any patient."( Bortezomib alone fails to decrease donor specific anti-HLA antibodies: 4 case reports.
Legendre, C; Sberro-Soussan, R; Suberbielle-Boissel, C; Zuber, J, 2009
)
2.52
"Bortezomib treatment activated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated apoptosis, as demonstrated by the induction of GADD153, an ER stress-inducible transcription factor, and of the death receptor DR5, in EGFR inhibitor-resistant cells, but not in parental cells."( Antitumor activity of bortezomib in human cancer cells with acquired resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Cascone, T; Ciardiello, F; D'Aiuto, E; De Palma, R; De Vita, F; Martinelli, E; Morgillo, F; Orditura, M; Troiani, T, 2011
)
1.41
"Bortezomib treatment initiated following inoculation of tumor cells strikingly reduced tumor growth, restricted tumor cells mainly to the marrow cavity, and almost completely inhibited osteolysis in the bone microenvironment over a 3- to 4-week period as shown by [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, micro-computed tomography scanning, radiography, and histology."( A proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, inhibits breast cancer growth and reduces osteolysis by downregulating metastatic genes.
Ayers, DC; Barthel, TK; Bouxsein, ML; Cheng, D; Hussain, S; Jones, MD; Lian, JB; Liu, JC; Lovria, E; Mukherjee, S; Mulay, S; Schoonmaker, JA; Stein, GS, 2010
)
1.39
"Bortezomib treatment strongly reduced T-dependent Ab titers mainly due to depletion of plasma cells."( The early marginal zone B cell-initiated T-independent type 2 response resists the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.
Böhm, C; Jäck, HM; Lang, VR; Meister, S; Mielenz, D; Neubert, K; Schett, G; Voll, RE, 2010
)
1.3
"Bortezomib treatment markedly enhanced bone metabolic activity and increased alkaline phosphatase levels, and decreased monoclonal protein levels."( Bone scan images reveal increased osteoblastic function after bortezomib treatment in patients with multiple myeloma.
Cho, BS; Cho, SG; Eom, KS; Kim, DW; Kim, HJ; Kim, YJ; Lee, JW; Lee, S; Lee, SE; Min, CK; Min, WS; Park, CW; Yahng, SA, 2011
)
1.33
"Bortezomib-treated MM patients whose tumours had high baseline expression of genes suppressed by LCQ195 had significantly shorter progression-free and overall survival than those with low levels of these transcripts in their MM cells."( Molecular and cellular effects of multi-targeted cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition in myeloma: biological and clinical implications.
Anderson, KC; Buon, L; Delmore, J; Hayden, P; Jacobs, HM; Jakubikova, J; Laubach, J; Lengauer, C; McMillin, DW; Mitsiades, CS; Munshi, NC; Negri, J; Ooi, M; Richardson, PG; Schlossman, R, 2011
)
1.09
"Bortezomib-treated hTNF-transgenic mice showed moderately increased inflammatory activity and dramatically enhanced bone erosions associated with a significant increase in the number of synovial osteoclasts. "( Proteasome inhibition aggravates tumor necrosis factor-mediated bone resorption in a mouse model of inflammatory arthritis.
Baum, W; Distler, JH; Frey, B; Gückel, E; Meister, S; Neubert, K; Polzer, K; Schett, G; Voll, RE; Zwerina, J, 2011
)
1.81
"Bortezomib treatment leads to increased binding of C/EBP to previously recognized binding sites in the ZTA promoter."( Bortezomib induction of C/EBPβ mediates Epstein-Barr virus lytic activation in Burkitt lymphoma.
Ambinder, RF; Chen, J; Hayward, SD; Li, H; Shamay, M; Shirley, CM; Zahnow, CA, 2011
)
2.53
"Bortezomib treatment reduced proteasome activity in the diaphragm of emphysematous and normal hamsters."( Proteasome inhibition improves diaphragm function in an animal model for COPD.
Dekhuijzen, R; Ennen, L; Heunks, L; Linkels, M; Ottenheijm, C; van Hees, H, 2011
)
1.09
"Bortezomib treatment is able to overcome the survival disadvantage in patients with MYC activation."( Clinical and biological implications of MYC activation: a common difference between MGUS and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Bergsagel, PL; Chesi, M; Chng, WJ; Chung, TH; Fonseca, R; Gonzalez-Paz, N; Huang, GF; Mulligan, G; Ng, SB; Troska-Price, T, 2011
)
1.09
"Bortezomib treatment did not significantly decrease DSA MFI within the 270-day posttreatment period in any patient."( Bortezomib alone fails to decrease donor specific anti-HLA antibodies: even after one year post-treatment.
Legendre, C; Sberro-Soussan, R; Suberbielle-Boissel, C; Zuberl, J, 2010
)
2.52
"Bortezomib treatment led to phosphorylation/activation of jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) enzymes and JNK-dependent phosphorylation of Bcl-2 on serine 70."( Bortezomib induces autophagy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells via JNK activation.
Johnson, DE; Li, C, 2012
)
2.54
"Bortezomib treatment was supplied for patients before autoPBSCT and in the conditioning of transplantation, it was also used in maintaining treatment."( [Bortezomib combined with autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for therapy of patients with multiple myeloma].
Bai, H; Ling, YQ; Wang, CB; Wang, ML; Wu, B; Zhang, Q, 2011
)
2
"Bortezomib maintenance treatment upgraded post-ASCT CR responses with no severe grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy."( Sequential bortezomib, dexamethasone, and thalidomide maintenance therapy after single autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.
Cai, JL; Duarte, L; Farol, L; Forman, SJ; Frankel, PH; Htut, M; Karanes, C; Kogut, NM; Krishnan, AY; Murata-Collins, JL; Parker, PM; Popplewell, LL; Reburiano, E; Ruel, C; Sahebi, F; Somlo, G; Spielberger, RT; Thomas, SH, 2012
)
1.49
"Bortezomib treatment also reduced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines MIP-2 compared with control treated steatotic and lean liver transplants respectively (106±17.5 vs."( Ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat steatotic liver is dependent on NFκB P65 activation.
Chapman, WC; Csontos, K; Glasgow, SC; Jia, J; Liaw, JM; Liu, W; Mohanakumar, T; Ramachandran, S; Upadhya, GA, 2012
)
1.1
"Bortezomib-treated mast cells lost the ability to induce neovasculization and fibrosis, and did not promote the growth of Hodgkin tumor in vivo."( Mast cells promote the growth of Hodgkin's lymphoma cell tumor by modifying the tumor microenvironment that can be perturbed by bortezomib.
Miyata, Y; Mizuno, H; Nakao, N; Nakayama, T; Naoe, T; Nishiwaki, S; Saito, S; Takeshita, K, 2012
)
1.31
"Bortezomib treatment was shown to potently inhibit murine DSS-induced colitis. "( Proteasome inhibitor bortezomib ameliorates intestinal injury in mice.
Asano, Y; Kadono, T; Sato, S; Sugaya, M; Tada, Y; Yanaba, K, 2012
)
2.14
"Bortezomib treatment is likely to induce T cell death, thereby suppressing DSS-induced colitis by reducing IFN-γ production."( Proteasome inhibitor bortezomib ameliorates intestinal injury in mice.
Asano, Y; Kadono, T; Sato, S; Sugaya, M; Tada, Y; Yanaba, K, 2012
)
2.14
"Bortezomib treatment resulted in a significant reduction of superoxide content, lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation products, serum levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and interleukin-6."( Attenuation of early atherogenesis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice by proteasome inhibition.
Arias, A; Baumann, G; Dreger, H; Fechner, M; Hewing, B; Ludwig, A; Meiners, S; Stangl, K; Stangl, V; Wilck, N, 2012
)
1.1
"Bortezomib as retreatment was well tolerated, and the safety profile was consistent with previous studies of bortezomib in relapsed MM."( Effective response with bortezomib retreatment in relapsed multiple myeloma--a multicentre retrospective survey in Switzerland.
Olie, RA; Taverna, C; Trojan, A; Voegeli, J; von Rohr, A, 2012
)
1.41
"Bortezomib pre-treatment reduced cellular packing density, improved penetration, and enhanced cytotoxcity of several anticancer drugs in MCC derived from epithelioid cell lines."( Penetration of anticancer drugs through tumour tissue as a function of cellular packing density and interstitial fluid pressure and its modification by bortezomib.
Grantab, RH; Tannock, IF, 2012
)
1.3
"Bortezomib-treated HLA-mismatched patients experienced rates of NRM, acute and chronic GVHD, and survival similar to those of contemporaneous HLA-matched RIC HSCT at our institution."( Bortezomib-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor transplantation.
Alyea, EP; Antin, JH; Armand, P; Bindra, B; Blazar, BR; Cutler, C; Ho, VT; Kim, HT; Koreth, J; McDonough, SM; Ritz, J; Soiffer, RJ; Stevenson, KE, 2012
)
2.54
"Bortezomib treatment significantly enhanced p21(WAF1) protein levels in all cell lines but with different mechanisms according to ERα status."( Roles of estrogen receptor and p21(Waf1) in bortezomib-induced growth inhibition in human breast cancer cells.
Basile, I; Cathiard, AM; Garcia, M; Gary-Bobo, M; Gleizes, M; Maynadier, M; Sheikh, MS; Shi, J; Vaillant, O; Wah, JL, 2012
)
1.36
"Bortezomib rescue treatment was administered after the patients failed to respond to plasmapheresis/intravenous immunoglobulin and splenectomy."( The use of bortezomib as a rescue treatment for acute antibody-mediated rejection: report of three cases and review of literature.
Benedetti, E; Jeon, H; Joseph, J; Oberholzer, J; Spaggiari, M; Thielke, J; Tzvetanov, I, 2012
)
1.49
"Bortezomib (BRZ) treatment at non-toxic doses of rats fed alcohol chronically has shown protective effects by increasing liver antioxidant enzymes."( Proteasome inhibitors protect the steatotic and non-steatotic liver graft against cold ischemia reperfusion injury.
Bardag-Gorce, F; Bejaoui, M; Ben Abdennebi, H; Carbonell, T; Oliva, J; Pantazi, E; Rimola, A; Roselló-Catafau, J; Zaouali, MA, 2013
)
1.11
"Bortezomib treatment did not affect tissue cytokine levels."( Proteasome inhibition prolongs survival during lethal hemorrhagic shock in rats.
Bach, HH; Gamelli, RL; Laporte, HM; Majetschak, M; Wong, YM, 2013
)
1.11
"Bortezomib treatment led to accumulation of p21(WAF1/CIP1) and p27(KIP1) and decreased BCL-2; gemcitabine decreased p27(KIP1), induced BCL-2 and had no effect on p21(WAF1/CIP1)."( Schedule-dependent molecular effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer.
Bold, RJ; Fahy, BN; Schlieman, MG; Virudachalam, S, 2003
)
1.28
"Bortezomib/HA14-1 treatment triggered an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), which, along with apoptosis, was blocked by the free radical scavenger N-acetyl-L-cysteine (L-NAC)."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib promotes mitochondrial injury and apoptosis induced by the small molecule Bcl-2 inhibitor HA14-1 in multiple myeloma cells.
Dai, Y; Grant, S; Pei, XY, 2003
)
1.34
"Bortezomib-treated LNCaP-Pro5 tumors displayed reduced microvessel densities and vascular endothelial cell growth factor secretion and high levels of endothelial cell apoptosis consistent with angiogenesis inhibition."( Differential effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib on apoptosis and angiogenesis in human prostate tumor xenografts.
Logothetis, C; McConkey, DJ; Papandreou, C; Pettaway, C; Song, R; Williams, S, 2003
)
1.29
"Bortezomib treatment did not affect stem cell mobilization in eight or transplantation in six patients."( Bortezomib therapy alone and in combination with dexamethasone for previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma.
Camacho, E; Crowley, J; Durie, BG; Gabayan, E; Irwin, D; Jagannath, S; Lutzky, J; Mazumder, A; McKinley, M; Schenkein, D; Wolf, J, 2005
)
2.49
"Bortezomib treatment did not alter CYP3A activity and docetaxel clearance."( Phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Almuete, VI; Armstrong, DK; Baker, SD; Carducci, MA; Dinh, K; Donehower, RC; Lassiter, L; Messersmith, WA; Sullivan, RA; Wright, JJ, 2006
)
1.39
"Bortezomib-treated neuroblastoma cells were arrested at G2/M and underwent apoptosis (mean percentage of apoptotic cells in four neuroblastoma cell lines treated with 20 nM bortezomib for 24 hours ranged from 20% to 35%, and caspases were activated by two- to fivefold with respect to untreated cells)."( Effect of bortezomib on human neuroblastoma cell growth, apoptosis, and angiogenesis.
Brignole, C; Cilli, M; Cioni, M; Corrias, MV; Di Paolo, D; Marimpietri, D; Nico, B; Pagnan, G; Pastorino, F; Pezzolo, A; Piccardi, F; Pistoia, V; Ponzoni, M; Ribatti, D, 2006
)
1.46
"Bortezomib/TRAIL cotreatment bears the risk of severe hepatotoxicity at high but clinically relevant concentrations of bortezomib. "( TRAIL/bortezomib cotreatment is potentially hepatotoxic but induces cancer-specific apoptosis within a therapeutic window.
Ganten, TM; Haas, TL; Kolb, A; Koschny, R; Sprick, MR; Stremmel, W; Sykora, J; Walczak, H, 2007
)
2.26
"Bortezomib treatment resulted in dose and time-dependent decreases in cell proliferation and resulted in cell cycle arrest. "( Bortezomib inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor burden in a murine model of neuroblastoma.
Davidoff, AM; Dickson, PV; Hamner, JB; Ng, CY; Sims, TL; Spence, Y; Zhou, J, 2007
)
3.23
"Bortezomib/PXD101 treatment markedly triggered reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation that was accompanied by p53, H2A.X and p38-mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation."( The histone deacetylase inhibitor, PXD101, potentiates bortezomib-induced anti-multiple myeloma effect by induction of oxidative stress and DNA damage.
Anderson, G; Belani, C; Feng, R; Lentzsch, S; Mapara, MY; Oton, A, 2007
)
1.31
"Bortezomib treatment decreases intracellular glutathione both in MM cell lines and in malignant plasma cells obtained from MM patients."( Redox homeostasis modulates the sensitivity of myeloma cells to bortezomib.
Caligaris-Cappio, F; Cozza, S; Ferrarini, M; Nerini-Molteni, S; Sitia, R, 2008
)
1.31
"Bortezomib treatment increased the Bax protein expression."( Effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents in gastric cancer cell lines.
Bae, SH; Hyun, MS; Kim, MK; Lee, KH; Ryoo, HM; Sin, JI, 2008
)
1.34
"Bortezomib treatment significantly improved diaphragm single fiber force generating capacity (approximately 30-40%) and cross-bridge cycling kinetics (approximately 20%) in CHF."( Proteasome inhibition improves diaphragm function in congestive heart failure rats.
Dekhuijzen, PN; Heunks, LM; Jin, B; Li, YP; Linkels, M; Ottenheijm, CA; Pigmans, CJ; van Hees, HW, 2008
)
1.07
"In bortezomib-treated mice, autophagy was activated in hepatocytes as determined by EM and biochemical analysis."( Autophagy activation by rapamycin eliminates mouse Mallory-Denk bodies and blocks their proteasome inhibitor-mediated formation.
Ghori, N; Hanada, S; Harada, M; Omary, MB; Toivola, DM, 2008
)
0.86
"AMR treatment with bortezomib was effective, showing stable renal function at 24 months. "( Antibody-Mediated Rejection Treatment With Bortezomib in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center 24-Month Follow-up Case Report.
Baca Córdova, A; Bahena Méndez, J; Carmona-Escamilla, MA; Galindo-Lopéz, R; López Y López, LR; Sebastián Díaz, MA; Trejo Curiel, I; Vázquez Dávila, RA; Wasung de Lay, M; Zarate Rodríguez, PA, 2020
)
1.15
"If treatment with bortezomib is beneficial in these cases, this will be the basis for implementation in the current guidelines."( Generate-Boost: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, double-blinded phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of bortezomib in patients with severe autoimmune encephalitis.
Chung, HY; Geis, C; Günther, A; Lehmann, T; Leypoldt, F; Platzer, S; Prüss, H; Scherag, A; Wickel, J, 2020
)
1.08
"Treatment with Bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor) and Daratumumab (DARA, a monoclonal anti CD38 antibody) are effective in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). "( Effect of Bortezomib Regimens and Daratumumab Monotherapy on Cellular Immunity in Multiple Myeloma Patients.
Al-Attar, M; Kakoo, A; Rasheed, T, 2021
)
1.38
"Treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone significantly improved the patient's symptoms."( The Coexistence of Multiple Myeloma-associated Amyloid Light-chain Amyloidosis and Fabry Disease in a Hemodialysis Patient.
Fukami, K; Kodama, G; Moriyama, A; Nakayama, Y; Taguchi, K, 2017
)
0.79
"Treatment with bortezomib followed by daunorubicin treatment was more effective, compared with treatment with daunorubicin followed by bortezomib."( Combination of bortezomib and daunorubicin in the induction of apoptosis in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Du, S; Du, X; He, C; Jia, P; Li, J; Lu, H; Shen, Z; Tong, J; Wu, Y; Xu, H; Zhao, W; Zhou, L, 2017
)
1.15
"Pretreatment with bortezomib (50-250 nM, 2-7 h) significantly decreased transport of [3H]CCK-8, a specific OATP1B3 substrate, in HEK293-OATP1B3 and human sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (SCH)."( Treatment with proteasome inhibitor bortezomib decreases organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B3-mediated transport in a substrate-dependent manner.
Alam, K; Crowe, A; Ding, K; Farasyn, T; Yue, W, 2017
)
1.05
"Treatment with bortezomib completely overcame the negative prognosis of high-risk CA in patients without subclones, but not in patients with additional subclonal CA."( Prognostic significance of cytogenetic heterogeneity in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Bertsch, U; Blau, IW; Bochtler, T; Goldschmidt, H; Haenel, M; Hielscher, T; Hillengass, J; Hose, D; Jauch, A; Lindemann, HW; Merz, M; Neben, K; Raab, MS; Salwender, H; Scheid, C; Schmidt-Wolf, IGH; Schönland, SO; Seckinger, A; Weisel, KC, 2018
)
0.82
"Treatment with bortezomib decreased RPE viability in a dose-dependent manner, and flow cytometry revealed that these effects were due to arrest of the G2/M phase cell-cycle. "( Bortezomib inhibits proliferation, migration, and TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of RPE cells.
Baek, WK; Joo, CK; Jun, JH; Kim, JY; Kim, KS; Lee, HG; Lee, Y; Moon, K, 2017
)
2.25
"Treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone was initiated; due to side effects, the treatment was later switched to lenalidomide, which was better tolerated."( Primary systemic amyloidosis with skin and cardiac involvement: a case report
Jurčić, V; Marko, PB; Trajber Horvat, A; Trčko, K, 2018
)
0.82
"Co-treatment with bortezomib and either doxorubicin or carboplatin was more toxic to canine osteosarcoma cells than each agent alone."( Pre-clinical evaluation of proteasome inhibitors for canine and human osteosarcoma.
Hawkins, CJ; Patatsos, K; Shekhar, TM, 2018
)
0.8
"Treatment with bortezomib did not improve the melena or the underlying disease."( Therapeutic effects of lenalidomide on hemorrhagic intestinal myeloma-associated AL amyloidosis.
Aoki, K; Arima, H; Imai, H; Ishikawa, T; Kato, A; Matsushita, A; Mori, M; Nagano, S; Ono, Y; Tabata, S; Takahashi, T; Takiuchi, Y; Yanagita, S, 2013
)
0.73
"Treatment with bortezomib or mycophenolic acid induced B-cell apoptosis and inhibited secretion of antibodies."( Effect of mycophenolic acid and bortezomib on purified human B cells: an in vitro study of long-term functionally stable MICA-sensitized renal recipients.
Li, Zw; Luo, M; Qiu, Jx; Wang, Y; Wen, Xf, 2013
)
1.01
"Treatment with bortezomib induced dose-dependent dissociation of protein synthesis machinery (chromatolysis) and nuclear retention of poly(A) RNA granules resulting in neuronal dysfunction."( Reactive nucleolar and Cajal body responses to proteasome inhibition in sensory ganglion neurons.
Berciano, MT; Casafont, I; Lafarga, M; Palanca, A, 2014
)
0.74
"Treatment with bortezomib, almost in the second- or third-line setting, was associated with longer median OS (35.5 months) and the median time to progression (TTP) (6.0 months)."( The treatment outcome of multiple myeloma patients ineligible for hematopoietic transplantation--a single institutional experience in Taiwan.
Chang, PY; Chao, TY; Chen, JH; Chen, YC; Dai, MS; Ho, CL; Huang, TC; Kao, WY; Wu, YY, 2015
)
0.76
"Treatment with bortezomib, a protease inhibitor, eliminated residual host-type plasma cells secreting anti-A and restored normal donor-derived erythropoiesis."( Successful treatment of severe immune hemolytic anemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with bortezomib: report of a case and review of literature.
Cohen, C; Hosoba, S; Jaye, DL; Roback, JD; Waller, EK, 2015
)
0.97
"Retreatment with bortezomib (B) is often considered for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), but this strategy is hindered by uncertainty of response and emergence of B-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN). "( Acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib, doxorubicin and low-dose dexamethasone: a study from the Wisconsin Oncology Netwo
Asimakopoulos, F; Callander, N; Campbell, T; Eickhoff, J; Go, R; Hegeman, R; Hematti, P; Hutson, P; Longo, W; Markovina, S; Miyamoto, S; Williams, E, 2014
)
0.94
"Treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone alone was sufficient to clear the bilateral cystoid macular edema and subretinal fluid."( Resolution of bilateral cystoid macular edema and subfoveal serous retinal detachments after treatment with bortezomib in a patient with "smoldering" multiple myeloma.
Dewan, VN; Grannis, CH; Wang, RC, 2014
)
0.95
"Co-treatment with bortezomib and DT97 reduced the growth of myeloma xenotransplants in murine models and prolonged host survival."( High throughput chemical library screening identifies a novel p110-δ inhibitor that potentiates the anti-myeloma effect of bortezomib.
Driscoll, JJ; Malek, E, 2016
)
0.96
"Treatment was bortezomib 1.7 mg/m(2) IV on days 1, 4 and 8 and then surgery on day 8 or 9."( A phase II trial evaluating the effects and intra-tumoral penetration of bortezomib in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas.
Bredel, M; Chandler, JP; Ferrarese, R; Grimm, SA; Helenowski, I; Levy, RM; Muro, K; Paton, M; Rademaker, A; Raizer, JJ; Rosenow, J, 2016
)
1.01
"Treatment with bortezomib alone increased the phosphorylation of AKT (P-AKT), whereas the addition of BKM120 markedly downregulated P-AKT in both bortezomib-sensitive and bortezomib-resistant cells."( Novel phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor BKM120 enhances the sensitivity of multiple myeloma to bortezomib and overcomes resistance.
Chen, Y; Tong, J; Wang, Y; Wu, Y; Xiang, R; Xu, W; Yan, H; Yu, W; Zhang, N, 2017
)
1.01
"Mice treated with bortezomib before the transfusion of KEL RBCs became alloimmunized in three of three experiments, although their serum anti-KEL IgG levels were 2.6-fold lower than those in untreated mice."( Bortezomib decreases the magnitude of a primary humoral immune response to transfused red blood cells in a murine model.
Gibb, DR; Hendrickson, JE; Liu, J; Natarajan, P; Santhanakrishnan, M; Slater, LM, 2017
)
2.22
"Co-treatment with bortezomib and doxorubicin prolonged the survival of BCP-ALL xenograft mice, with a significant reduction of leukemia cells in BM."( Bortezomib interferes with adhesion of B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells through SPARC up-regulation in human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal/stem cells.
Andoh, A; Fujii, S; Fujishiro, A; Hirai, H; Hishita, T; Ichinohe, T; Iwasa, M; Maekawa, T; Miura, Y; Sugino, N; Yokota, A; Yoshioka, S, 2017
)
2.22
"Treatment with bortezomib depleted plasma cells producing antibodies to double-stranded DNA, eliminated autoantibody production, ameliorated glomerulonephritis and prolonged survival of two mouse strains with lupus-like disease, NZB/W F1 and MRL/lpr mice."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib depletes plasma cells and protects mice with lupus-like disease from nephritis.
Amann, K; Kalden, JR; Manz, RA; Maseda, D; Meister, S; Moser, K; Neubert, K; Voll, RE; Weisel, F; Wiethe, C; Winkler, TH, 2008
)
0.99
"Retreatment with bortezomib-based therapy is feasible, with predictable toxicities. "( An observational, retrospective analysis of retreatment with bortezomib for multiple myeloma.
Beveridge, RA; Conner, TM; Doan, QD; LeBlanc, AL; Walters, IB, 2008
)
0.93
"Pretreatment with bortezomib was able to ameliorate CAM-DR of myeloma cells to vincristine and dexamethasone."( Bortezomib overcomes cell-adhesion-mediated drug resistance through downregulation of VLA-4 expression in multiple myeloma.
Furukawa, Y; Kano, Y; Kikuchi, J; Mori, M; Muroi, K; Nagai, T; Noborio-Hatano, K; Nobuyoshi, M; Oh, I; Ozaki, K; Ozawa, K; Sato, K; Shimizu, R; Suzuki, T; Takatoku, M; Ueda, M; Wada, T, 2009
)
2.12
"Treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasome was subsequently started and a complete hematological response was achieved."( Generalized cutis laxa and fibrillar glomerulopathy resulting from IgG Deposition in IgG-lambda Monoclonal Gammopathy: pulmonary hemorrhage during stem cell mobilization and complete hematological response with bortezomib and dexamethasone therapy.
Bladé, J; Cibeira, MT; Fernández de Larrea, C; Lloreta, J; Mascaró, JM; Rovira, M; Serra, N; Solé, M; Torras, A, 2009
)
0.88
"Treatment with bortezomib produced a significant reduction of cystatin-C, mainly in responders."( Cystatin-C is an independent prognostic factor for survival in multiple myeloma and is reduced by bortezomib administration.
Anargyrou, K; Christoulas, D; Dimopoulos, MA; Kastritis, E; Katodritou, E; Michalis, E; Pouli, A; Terpos, E; Tsiftsakis, E; Tsionos, K; Verrou, E; Zervas, K, 2009
)
0.91
"Pretreatment with bortezomib does not improve the intracellular anthracycline concentration in K562/A02 cells."( The effects of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib on a P-gp positive leukemia cell line K562/A02.
Chen, L; Chen, Z; Han, F; Li, J; Lü, S; Wang, J; Xu, X; Yang, J; Zhou, H, 2010
)
0.96
"Treatment with bortezomib at 1.5 mg/m(2)/dose was not feasible in this patient population due to excess toxicity."( A phase II evaluation of bortezomib in the treatment of recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Aghajanian, C; Blessing, JA; Darcy, KM; DeGeest, K; Mannel, RS; Reid, G; Riordan, W; Rotmensch, J; Rubin, SC; Schilder, RJ, 2009
)
1
"Retreatment with bortezomib alone or in combination is effective and well tolerated in patients with MM who have responded to their initial bortezomib treatment."( Retreatment with bortezomib alone or in combination for patients with multiple myeloma following an initial response to bortezomib.
Carloss, H; Druck, M; Kerr, R; Lee, M; Lopez, J; Noga, SJ; Sood, R; Walters, IB, 2009
)
1.02
"Pretreatment with bortezomib effectively overcomes APO2L/TRAIL apoptosis resistance in myeloma cell lines and in CD138+ cells while directly adhered or in transwell assay. "( Bortezomib restores stroma-mediated APO2L/TRAIL apoptosis resistance in multiple myeloma.
Anasetti, C; Dalton, W; Meads, M; Parquet, N; Perez, LE, 2010
)
2.14
"Retreatment with bortezomib provided prompt, complete, and durable DSA elimination."( Proteasome inhibitor-based primary therapy for antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection.
Alloway, RR; Arend, LJ; Brailey, P; Everly, JJ; Govil, A; Mogilishetty, G; Rike, AH; Roy-Chaudhury, P; Walsh, RC; Woodle, ES, 2010
)
0.69
"Treatment with bortezomib caused a significant increase in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and pro-collagen type I N-terminal propeptide, a novel bone formation marker. "( First-line treatment with bortezomib rapidly stimulates both osteoblast activity and bone matrix deposition in patients with multiple myeloma, and stimulates osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in vitro.
Abildgaard, N; Delaissé, JM; Garnero, P; Lund, T; Ormstrup, T; Pedersen, PT; Plesner, T; Søe, K, 2010
)
1.01
"Cotreatment with bortezomib (5 μM) and TGF-β (10 μM) increased the proportion of apoptotic cells in HTFs on FACS analysis, whereas either bortezomib or TGF-β treatment alone did not. "( Potentiation of bortezomib-induced apoptosis by TGF-beta in cultured human Tenon's fibroblasts: contribution of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.
Cho, YJ; Chung, EJ; Jung, SA; Kim, SW; Lee, JH; Moon, SW, 2010
)
1.05
"Pretreatment with bortezomib for 3 weeks before inoculation of tumor cells was also effective in reducing osteolysis."( A proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, inhibits breast cancer growth and reduces osteolysis by downregulating metastatic genes.
Ayers, DC; Barthel, TK; Bouxsein, ML; Cheng, D; Hussain, S; Jones, MD; Lian, JB; Liu, JC; Lovria, E; Mukherjee, S; Mulay, S; Schoonmaker, JA; Stein, GS, 2010
)
0.99
"Cotreatment of bortezomib with eeyarestatin markedly enhanced cell death in cervical cancer cells, allowing reduction of the bortezomib concentration necessary for efficient cell death to as low as 5 ng/ml. "( Eeyarestatin causes cervical cancer cell sensitization to bortezomib treatment by augmenting ER stress and CHOP expression.
Brem, GJ; Brüning, A; Mylonas, I, 2013
)
0.99
"Treatment with bortezomib, a therapeutic proteasome inhibitor induced apoptosis and repressed the proliferation of RPMI8226 and U266 cells through inhibition of NF-κB p65 and IκBα."( BlyS: a potential hallmark of multiple myeloma.
Chen, X; Hu, C; Huang, Q; Liu, B; Ma, Y; Miao, P; Qian, L; Shen, L; Wang, L; Wang, P; Yu, Q; Yuan, X; Zhang, D; Zhang, J, 2013
)
0.73
"Treatment with bortezomib led to a moderate increase in osteoblastic differentiation markers in hMSCs and hOBs."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib stimulates osteoblastic differentiation of human osteoblast precursors via upregulation of vitamin D receptor signalling.
Heider, U; Kaiser, MF; Mieth, M; Sezer, O; von Metzler, I; Zang, C, 2013
)
1.03
"Co-treatment of bortezomib and calyculin A, a PP2A inhibitor, reduced the effect of bortezomib on P-Akt, P-4EBP1, and autophagy."( Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A mediates bortezomib-induced autophagy in hepatocellular carcinoma independent of proteasome.
Chen, KF; Cheng, AL; Hou, DR; Lin, CS; Liu, CY; Shiau, CW; Yu, HC, 2013
)
0.97
"Treatment with bortezomib reduced butyrate-induced activation of nuclear factor kappa B to baseline levels."( Combined proteasome and histone deacetylase inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer.
Broad, RM; Denlinger, CE; Jones, DR; Keller, MD; Mayo, MW, 2004
)
0.66
"Treatment with Bortezomib induced procaspase-3 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage and decreased the amount of extracellular signal regulated kinase (Erk1/2) and phospho-Erk1/2."( Bortezomib is an efficient agent in plasma cell leukemias.
Aguado, B; Alegre, A; Bladé, J; Esparís-Ogando, A; Gutiérrez, N; Mateo, G; Pandiella, A; San Miguel, JF; Schenkein, D, 2005
)
2.11
"Treatment with bortezomib resulted in decreased transcription of the BCL-2 promoter, decreased BCL-2 levels, and induced apoptosis."( Reduction in BCL-2 levels by 26S proteasome inhibition with bortezomib is associated with induction of apoptosis in small cell lung cancer.
Bold, RJ; Davies, AM; Gandara, DG; Lara, PN; Mortenson, MM; Schlieman, MG; Virudachalam, S, 2005
)
0.91
"DCs treated with bortezomib show skewed phenotypic maturation in response to stimuli of bacterial (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]) and endogenous sources (including TNF-alpha and CD40L), as well as reduced cytokine production and immunostimulatory capacity."( Proteasome inhibitor bortezomib modulates TLR4-induced dendritic cell activation.
Ballestrero, A; Brauer, KM; Brossart, P; Grünebach, F; Nencioni, A; Schmidt, SM; Schwarzenberg, K, 2006
)
0.98
"Treatment with bortezomib reduces adverse cerebrovascular events including secondary thrombosis, inflammatory responses, and blood brain barrier (BBB) disruption, and hence reduces infarct volume and neurological functional deficit when administrated within 4 h after stroke onset."( Treatment of embolic stroke in rats with bortezomib and recombinant human tissue plasminogen activator.
Chopp, M; Hozeska, A; Liu, X; Lu, M; Riordan, W; Stagliano, N; Zhang, L; Zhang, ZG, 2006
)
0.94
"Treatment with bortezomib at 4 to 8 hours post-gemcitabine significantly induced cell death in KBwt cell lines."( SUMOylation plays a role in gemcitabine- and bortezomib-induced cytotoxicity in human oropharyngeal carcinoma KB gemcitabine-resistant clone.
Ann, DK; Boo, LM; Chen, Y; Chung, V; Liu, X; Nguyen, HV; Song, J; Yen, Y; Zhou, B; Zhu, L, 2006
)
0.93
"Treatment with bortezomib and MD5-1 reduced lung metastases in mice carrying Renca and 4T1 tumors (mean number of metastases, bortezomib + MD5-1 vs MD5-1: Renca-FLAG, 1 vs 8, difference = 7, 95% CI = 5 to 9, P < .001; 4T1, 1 vs 12, difference = 11, 95% CI = 9 to 12, P < .001) and increased median survival of mice bearing Renca-FLAG tumors (bortezomib + MD5-1 vs bortezomib + control isotype antibody: 22 of 30 [73%] were still alive at day 180 vs median survival of 42 days [95% CI = 41 to 44 days, P < .001]) in the absence of obvious toxicity."( Treating metastatic solid tumors with bortezomib and a tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor agonist antibody.
Brooks, AD; Elliott, PJ; Murphy, WJ; Sayers, TJ; Shanker, A; Smyth, MJ; Takeda, K; Tristan, CA; Wine, JW; Yagita, H, 2008
)
0.96

Toxicity

A 74-year-old female with relapsed multiple myeloma was treated with twice-weekly bortezomib plus dexamethasone (BD)therapy, but severe gastrointestinal adverse events(grade 3 paralytic ileus and constipation) developed. The risk of cardiac adverse events (CAEs) with PIs has been documented with bortsomib and carfilzomib; however, only a few studies have been reported on ixazomib.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Their toxic profile is favorable, but during the drug development process some severe (sometimes lethal) toxicities have been observed, such as interstitial lung disease in patients treated with drugs targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor."( Side effects of anti-cancer molecular-targeted therapies (not monoclonal antibodies).
Awada, A; de Castro, G, 2006
)
0.33
" Adverse events, including thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy, have affected 30% to 60% of patients overall, and interrupted therapy in 10% to 20%."( A multicenter retrospective analysis of adverse events in Korean patients using bortezomib for multiple myeloma.
Bang, SM; Cho, KS; Jo, DY; Kim, CC; Kim, CS; Kim, K; Lee, JH; Lee, JJ; Lee, KH; Lee, NR; Min, CK; Min, YH; Park, S; Seong, CM; Sohn, SK; Suh, C; Yoon, HJ; Yoon, SS, 2006
)
0.56
" This article speculates that cyclosporine eye drops would also be useful for any disease causing ectropion or eclabion of the eye as well as toxic epidermal necrolysis-related eye pathology (in particular corneal scarring)."( A review of deferasirox, bortezomib, dasatinib, and cyclosporine eye drops: possible uses and known side effects in cutaneous medicine.
Scheinfeld, N, 2007
)
0.64
" As in the total APEX population, rates of grade 3/4 adverse events were higher in bortezomib- versus dexamethasone-treated patients aged > or =65 years and with >1 prior line, while rates of serious adverse events were similar; toxicities generally proved manageable."( Safety and efficacy of bortezomib in high-risk and elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
Anderson, KC; Ben-Yehuda, D; Cavenagh, JD; Facon, T; Harousseau, JL; Irwin, D; Lonial, S; Richardson, PG; San Miguel, JF; Schuster, MW; Sonneveld, P; Stadtmauer, EA, 2007
)
0.88
" Grade 3/4 hematologic or neurologic toxicities (graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE; version 3]) were reported to occur in 9 patients and 1 patient, respectively, whereas 6 patients experienced possible or documented infections."( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in patients with plasma cell leukemia.
D'Arena, G; Ferrara, F; Filardi, N; Gay, F; Guariglia, R; Guglielmelli, T; Musto, P; Palumbo, A; Pitini, V; Rossini, F, 2007
)
0.65
"Bortezomib appears to be an effective drug for PCL that could significantly improve the usually adverse clinical outcome of these patients."( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in patients with plasma cell leukemia.
D'Arena, G; Ferrara, F; Filardi, N; Gay, F; Guariglia, R; Guglielmelli, T; Musto, P; Palumbo, A; Pitini, V; Rossini, F, 2007
)
2.09
" Awareness of the various potential gastrointestinal toxic effects of bortezomib is of relevance given the growing number of patients undergoing treatment with this important and effective new cancer drug."( Bortezomib-induced paralytic ileus is a potential gastrointestinal side effect of this first-in-class anticancer proteasome inhibitor.
Brugnatelli, S; Brunetti, L; Corazza, GR; Gobbi, PG; Palladini, G; Perfetti, V; Sgarella, A, 2007
)
2.02
" The most frequently reported adverse events were thrombocytopenia (34%), peripheral neuropathy (31%), diarrhoea (20%) and fatigue (19%)."( Daily practice use of Bortezomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Safety/efficacy results of a compassionate use program in Switzerland.
Calderoni, A; Cornu, P; Freimann, H; Olie, R, 2007
)
0.65
"Our results in daily oncology practice confirm findings from clinical trials, demonstrating high response rates and predictable adverse events in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib."( Daily practice use of Bortezomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Safety/efficacy results of a compassionate use program in Switzerland.
Calderoni, A; Cornu, P; Freimann, H; Olie, R, 2007
)
0.84
" With dexamethasone, grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and discontinuations for AEs were significantly elevated in patients with CrCl < or =50 vs >50 ml min(-1)."( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib in patients with renal impairment: results from the APEX phase 3 study.
Anderson, KC; Ben-Yehuda, D; Bladé, J; Boccadoro, M; Boral, AL; Cavenagh, JD; Esseltine, DL; Facon, T; Goldschmidt, H; Harousseau, JL; Irwin, D; Lonial, S; Neuwirth, R; Reece, D; Richardson, PG; San-Miguel, JF; Schuster, MW; Sonneveld, P; Stadtmauer, EA, 2008
)
0.66
" Coexposure of LBH589 and bortezomib at minimally toxic doses of either drug alone resulted in a striking induction of apoptosis in established U251, U87, and D37 GBM cell lines, as well as in GBM8, GBM10, GBM12, GBM14, and GBM56 short-term cultured cell lines."( Mitochondrial Bax translocation partially mediates synergistic cytotoxicity between histone deacetylase inhibitors and proteasome inhibitors in glioma cells.
Adjei, AA; Atadja, P; Friday, BB; Sarkaria, J; Wigle, D; Yang, L; Yu, C, 2008
)
0.65
" The most common grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (31%/0%), thrombocytopenia (25%/2%), and anemia (13%/0%)."( Safety and efficacy of bortezomib and melphalan combination in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated results of a phase 1/2 study after longer follow-up.
Berenson, JR; Hilger, J; Lee, SP; Mapes, R; Morrison, B; Nassir, Y; Swift, R; Vescio, RA; Wilson, J; Yang, HH; Yellin, O, 2008
)
0.66
" However, patients with impaired renal function were at a slightly increased risk of a drug-related serious adverse event (28% vs."( Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety in patients with renal function impairment.
Bladé, J; Cibeira, MT; Hajek, R; Harousseau, JL; Nagler, A; Orlowski, RZ; Robak, T; San Miguel, JF; Sonneveld, P; Spencer, A; Sutherland, HJ; Zhuang, SH, 2008
)
0.62
"Bortezomib has been shown to be a safe and efficacious for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."( Safety and efficacy results from an international expanded access programme to bortezomib for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: a subset analysis of the Australian and New Zealand data of 111 patients.
Butcher, BE; Cannell, P; Horvath, N; Mikhael, JR; Prince, HM; Quach, H, 2009
)
2.02
" Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 57 patients (52%); the most common were thrombocytopenia (25."( Safety and efficacy results from an international expanded access programme to bortezomib for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: a subset analysis of the Australian and New Zealand data of 111 patients.
Butcher, BE; Cannell, P; Horvath, N; Mikhael, JR; Prince, HM; Quach, H, 2009
)
0.58
"Our analysis confirms that bortezomib is safe and effective in relapsed and refractory MM in a real-life clinical setting."( Safety and efficacy results from an international expanded access programme to bortezomib for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: a subset analysis of the Australian and New Zealand data of 111 patients.
Butcher, BE; Cannell, P; Horvath, N; Mikhael, JR; Prince, HM; Quach, H, 2009
)
0.88
" In conclusion, bortezomib-based regimens are safe and effective and should be considered as appropriate treatment options for MM patients with any degree of RI."( Safety and efficacy of bortezomib-based regimens for multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: a retrospective study of Italian Myeloma Network GIMEMA.
Baldini, L; Boccadoro, M; Bringhen, S; Callea, V; Casulli, AF; Catalano, L; Cavo, M; Ciolli, S; Di Raimondo, F; Galimberti, S; Gentile, M; Mannina, D; Mele, G; Morabito, F; Musto, P; Offidani, M; Palmieri, S; Palumbo, A; Petrucci, MT; Pinotti, G; Piro, E; Tosi, P, 2010
)
1.02
"VD regimen might be an efficient, rapid effective and safe regimen in the treatment of AL amyloidosis."( [The effects and safety of bortezomib combined with dexamethasone in the treatment of primary systemic amyloidosis].
Li, J; Su, C; Wang, HH; Zeng, LJ; Zhao, Y, 2009
)
0.65
"Bortezomib/ PLD/dexamethasone combination is safe and effective in elderly patients with resistant-relapsing MM."( Weekly bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone is a safe and effective therapy for elderly patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Bocchia, M; Defina, M; Fabbri, A; Gozzetti, A; Lauria, F; Marchini, E; Oliva, S, 2010
)
2.26
" Most adverse events were of mild degree and manageable."( Bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone combination therapy followed by thalidomide and dexamethasone consolidation as a salvage treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: analysis of efficacy and safety.
Bang, SM; Chung, J; Do, YR; Jin, JY; Joo, YD; Kang, HJ; Kim, BS; Kim, HY; Kim, K; Lee, DS; Lee, GW; Lee, JH; Lee, JJ; Lee, MH; Lee, SS; Park, J; Ryoo, HM; Shim, H; Suh, C; Yoon, SS, 2010
)
1.8
" The major adverse events associated with these treatments are somnolence (thalidomide), venous thromboembolism (thalidomide and lenalidomide), myelosuppression (lenalidomide and bortezomib), gastrointestinal disturbance, and peripheral neuropathy (thalidomide and bortezomib)."( Management of treatment-related adverse events in patients with multiple myeloma.
Mateos, MV, 2010
)
0.55
"The study was aimed to evaluate the adverse effects of PAD (bortezomib + adriamycin + dexamethasone) and VAD (vincristine + adriamycin + dexamethasone) as chemotherapy regimens in multiple myeloma patients."( [Adverse effects of PAD and VAD regimens in multiple myeloma patients].
Bo, J; Dou, LP; Gao, CJ; Han, XP; Huang, WR; Jing, Y; Li, F; Li, HH; Wang, FF; Wang, QS; Wang, SH; Yu, L; Zhao, Y; Zhu, HY, 2010
)
0.6
" Nonhematologic grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 35% of once-weekly patients and 51% of twice-weekly patients (P = ."( Efficacy and safety of once-weekly bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients.
Benevolo, G; Boccadoro, M; Bringhen, S; Callea, V; Cangialosi, C; Cavalli, M; Cavo, M; De Rosa, L; Evangelista, A; Falcone, AP; Gaidano, G; Gentili, S; Genuardi, M; Grasso, M; Guglielmelli, T; Larocca, A; Levi, A; Liberati, AM; Musto, P; Nozzoli, C; Palumbo, A; Patriarca, F; Ria, R; Rizzo, V; Rossi, D, 2010
)
0.64
"To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of bortezomib + adriamycin + dexamethasone (PAD) and vincristine + adriamycin + dexamethasone (VAD) regimens in untreated multiple myeloma (MM)."( [The efficacy and safety of PAD and VAD regimens for untreated multiple myeloma].
Bo, J; Dou, LP; Gao, CJ; Han, XP; Huang, WR; Jing, Y; Li, HH; Wang, QS; Wang, SH; Yu, L; Zhao, Y; Zhu, HY, 2010
)
0.62
" Both clinical effects and adverse effects were observed."( [The efficacy and safety of PAD and VAD regimens for untreated multiple myeloma].
Bo, J; Dou, LP; Gao, CJ; Han, XP; Huang, WR; Jing, Y; Li, HH; Wang, QS; Wang, SH; Yu, L; Zhao, Y; Zhu, HY, 2010
)
0.36
" However, these benefits are accompanied by increases in treatment-related adverse events (AEs), which may be particularly pronounced in older individuals."( Practical management of adverse events in multiple myeloma: can therapy be attenuated in older patients?
Bringhen, S; Mateos, MV; Palumbo, A; San Miguel, JF, 2011
)
0.37
"Toxicity data from cancer trials are summarized into a single outcome, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which does not account for multiple lower grade toxic effects nor differentiates between toxicity types and gradations within DLT."( Toxicity burden score: a novel approach to summarize multiple toxic effects.
Cheung, YK; Hershman, DL; Lee, SM; Leonard, JP; Martin, P, 2012
)
0.38
"17 for each grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxic effects unrelated to treatment."( Toxicity burden score: a novel approach to summarize multiple toxic effects.
Cheung, YK; Hershman, DL; Lee, SM; Leonard, JP; Martin, P, 2012
)
0.38
" It includes information from the grades and types of multiple toxic effects and can be applied in all phases of drug development."( Toxicity burden score: a novel approach to summarize multiple toxic effects.
Cheung, YK; Hershman, DL; Lee, SM; Leonard, JP; Martin, P, 2012
)
0.38
" The most common adverse events were mild to moderate (grades 1, 2)."( [The efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus thalidomide in treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma].
Chen, SL; Gao, W; Jiang, B; Qiu, LG; Yu, L; Zhong, YP, 2011
)
0.66
"To establish the clinical use of bortezomib with fewer adverse events, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus dexamethasone (BD) therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma."( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus dexamethasone therapy for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: once-weekly administration of bortezomib may reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events.
Fujita, Y; Fukushima, T; Iwao, H; Masaki, Y; Miki, M; Motoo, Y; Nakajima, A; Nakajima, H; Nakamura, T; Sakai, T; Sato, T; Sawaki, T; Tanaka, M; Umehara, H, 2011
)
0.96
" Initially, bortezomib was administered twice-weekly, but some severe adverse events developed; therefore, from January 2008, bortezomib was administered twice-weekly for the first two courses, followed by once-weekly for the subsequent courses."( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus dexamethasone therapy for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: once-weekly administration of bortezomib may reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events.
Fujita, Y; Fukushima, T; Iwao, H; Masaki, Y; Miki, M; Motoo, Y; Nakajima, A; Nakajima, H; Nakamura, T; Sakai, T; Sato, T; Sawaki, T; Tanaka, M; Umehara, H, 2011
)
1.06
"Once-weekly administration of bortezomib in BD therapy may reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events without reducing the clinical efficacy of this therapy for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma."( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus dexamethasone therapy for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: once-weekly administration of bortezomib may reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events.
Fujita, Y; Fukushima, T; Iwao, H; Masaki, Y; Miki, M; Motoo, Y; Nakajima, A; Nakajima, H; Nakamura, T; Sakai, T; Sato, T; Sawaki, T; Tanaka, M; Umehara, H, 2011
)
0.97
" In both arms, greater rates of severe hematologic adverse events were associated with RI (eGFR < 50 mL/min), however, therapy discontinuation rates were unaffected."( Safety and efficacy of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) in untreated multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment.
Baldini, L; Benevolo, G; Boccadoro, M; Bringhen, S; Cascavilla, N; Cavo, M; Di Raimondo, F; Gentile, M; Grasso, M; Guglielmelli, T; Majolino, I; Marasca, R; Mazzone, C; Montefusco, V; Morabito, F; Musolino, C; Musto, P; Nozzoli, C; Offidani, M; Palumbo, A; Patriarca, F; Petrucci, MT; Ria, R; Rossi, D; Vincelli, I, 2011
)
0.68
" Adverse reactions to bortezomib or a treatment regimen that included it occurred in 32 (54%) patients, highlighting neurotoxicity in 19 patients (32%) and gastrointestinal toxicity in 12 (20%)."( [Observational retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatment schemes with bortezomib for multiple myeloma in our hospital].
de Arriba de la Fuente, F; Iranzo Fernández, MD; León-Villar, J; Moreno Belmonte, MJ; Titos-Arcos, JC,
)
0.66
"A 74-year-old female with relapsed multiple myeloma was treated with twice-weekly bortezomib plus dexamethasone (BD)therapy, but severe gastrointestinal adverse events(grade 3 paralytic ileus and constipation)developed."( [Once-weekly bortezomib plus dexamethasone therapy induced complete response, reducing severe gastrointestinal adverse events for a patient with relapsed multiple myeloma - a case report].
Fujita, Y; Fukushima, T; Iwao, H; Masaki, Y; Miki, M; Nakajima, A; Nakamura, T; Sakai, T; Sato, T; Sawaki, T; Tanaka, M; Umehara, H, 2012
)
0.97
"Combined curcumin and PS-341 treatment has been reported to enhance cytotoxicity and minimize adverse effects through ERK and p38MAPK mechanisms in human multiple myeloma cells."( Curcumin enhances cytotoxic effects of bortezomib in human multiple myeloma H929 cells: potential roles of NF-κB/JNK.
Bai, QX; Zhang, XY, 2012
)
0.65
"Patients were graded for bortezomib-related toxicities: hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and peripheral neuropathy by modified Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy questionnaire and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events."( Prospective evaluation of the toxicity profile of proteasome inhibitor-based therapy in renal transplant candidates and recipients.
Alloway, RR; Girnita, AL; Hanseman, DJ; Sadaka, B; Schmidt, N; Shields, AR; Walsh, RC; Woodle, ES, 2012
)
0.68
" Evidence from animal models of chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy produced by the taxane agent, paclitaxel, and the platinum-complex agent, oxaliplatin, indicate that they produce neuropathy via a common mechanism-a toxic effect on the mitochondria in primary afferent sensory neurons."( Mitotoxicity and bortezomib-induced chronic painful peripheral neuropathy.
Bennett, GJ; Xiao, WH; Zheng, H, 2012
)
0.72
" However, adverse effects and drug resistance have been observed in patients, which is now emerging as a great challenge for the extended application of bortezomib."( Dissecting bortezomib: development, application, adverse effects and future direction.
Cao, B; Li, J; Mao, X, 2013
)
0.98
" These agents have specific adverse event (AE) profiles, and it is especially important to consider severe AEs that may lead to premature discontinuation, negatively affecting outcomes."( How to maintain patients on long-term therapy: understanding the profile and kinetics of adverse events.
Mateos, MV, 2012
)
0.38
" Most drug-related adverse events (AEs) (all grades, all cycles) were mild."( Efficacy and toxicity of two schedules of bortezomib in patients with recurrent or refractory follicular lymphoma: a randomised phase II trial from the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA).
Bosly, A; Bouabdallah, R; Boue, F; Bron, D; Casasnovas, O; Coiffier, B; Delarue, R; Feugier, P; Haioun, C; Offner, F; Ribrag, V; Tilly, H, 2013
)
0.65
"Cutaneous toxicity is a frequent side effect of new anticancer targeted therapies."( Cutaneous adverse reactions linked to targeted anticancer therapies bortezomib and lenalidomide for multiple myeloma: new drugs, old side effects.
Brandi, G; Dika, E; Maibach, H; Patrizi, A; Tacchetti, P; Venturi, M, 2014
)
0.64
"This study evaluates the impact of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADR) of the new therapies bortezomib and lenalidomide and presents a review of their skin side effects."( Cutaneous adverse reactions linked to targeted anticancer therapies bortezomib and lenalidomide for multiple myeloma: new drugs, old side effects.
Brandi, G; Dika, E; Maibach, H; Patrizi, A; Tacchetti, P; Venturi, M, 2014
)
0.86
" Three adverse events linked to bortezomib and 4 to lenalidomide forced to a complete withdrawal of the drug, while 3 reactions due to bortezomib mandated a dose reduction."( Cutaneous adverse reactions linked to targeted anticancer therapies bortezomib and lenalidomide for multiple myeloma: new drugs, old side effects.
Brandi, G; Dika, E; Maibach, H; Patrizi, A; Tacchetti, P; Venturi, M, 2014
)
0.92
" Our study suggests that cutaneous toxicities, when researched by Dermatologists, are a side effect even more frequent than the reported data."( Cutaneous adverse reactions linked to targeted anticancer therapies bortezomib and lenalidomide for multiple myeloma: new drugs, old side effects.
Brandi, G; Dika, E; Maibach, H; Patrizi, A; Tacchetti, P; Venturi, M, 2014
)
0.64
"Bortezomib retreatment regimen is demonstrated a higher response rate in patients who achieved deeper response in initial treatment, with no more adverse events."( [The efficacy and safety analysis of bortezomib retreatment in 76 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma].
Du, J; Fan, JL; Fu, WJ; Hou, J; Jiang, H; Jin, LN; Lan, HF; Lu, J; Yuan, ZG; Zeng, TM; Zhang, CY; Zhou, F; Zhou, LL, 2013
)
2.11
" Low-dose lenalidomide therapy was effective and safe against MM with a bortezomib-associated lung disorder."( Safety and effectiveness of low-dose lenalidomide therapy for multiple myeloma complicated with bortezomib-associated interstitial pneumonia.
Ihara, K; Inomata, H; Kato, J; Kikuchi, S; Koyama, R; Muramatsu, H; Nagamachi, Y; Nishisato, T; Nozawa, E; Okamoto, T; Ono, K; Tanaka, S; Yamada, H; Yamauchi, N; Yano, T, 2013
)
0.84
"4%) experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events, while only one (5."( [Efficacy and safety study of subcutaneous injection of bortezomib in the treatment of de novo patients with multiple myeloma].
Fu, CC; Gu, B; Jin, S; Li, WY; Liu, H; Ma, L; Sun, AN; Wu, DP; Wu, Q; Xin, X; Xue, SL; Zhao, SF; Zhu, XM, 2013
)
0.64
"The improved PAD regimen by changing bortezomib from intravenous administration to subcutaneous injection significantly reduced adverse events, improved the safety of clinical application of bortezomib without affecting curative effect, and had great progress."( [Efficacy and safety study of subcutaneous injection of bortezomib in the treatment of de novo patients with multiple myeloma].
Fu, CC; Gu, B; Jin, S; Li, WY; Liu, H; Ma, L; Sun, AN; Wu, DP; Wu, Q; Xin, X; Xue, SL; Zhao, SF; Zhu, XM, 2013
)
0.91
" Peripheral neuropathy is likely to be a class side effect of these drugs, although its severity is largely variable, and it deserves to be further investigated, since the mechanisms of BTZ-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (BiPN) are still unknown."( Evaluation of tubulin polymerization and chronic inhibition of proteasome as citotoxicity mechanisms in bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Bennett, DL; Canta, A; Carozzi, VA; Cavaletti, G; Ceresa, C; Chiorazzi, A; Colombo, M; Foudah, D; La Russa, F; Marmiroli, P; Meregalli, C; Miloso, M; Nicolini, G; Oggioni, N; Sala, B, 2014
)
0.62
" The outcomes and adverse effects of two groups were retrospectively evaluated and compared."( [Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous administration of bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma].
Ding, SH; Wang, QS; Wang, YS; Wang, ZT; Wu, F, 2014
)
0.65
" No significant differences of other adverse events between the two groups were observed."( [Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous administration of bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma].
Ding, SH; Wang, QS; Wang, YS; Wang, ZT; Wu, F, 2014
)
0.65
" Because a safe Bu exposure was unknown in patients receiving this combination, Bu was initially targeted to a total area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 20,000 μM × minute."( Safety and efficacy of targeted-dose busulfan and bortezomib as a conditioning regimen for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma undergoing a second autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation.
Akpek, G; Armstrong, E; Elekes, A; Freytes, CO; Kato, K; Patil, S; Ratanatharathorn, V; Reece, DE; Rodriguez, TE; Sahovic, E; Shaughnessy, PJ; Smith, A; Solomon, SR; Stadtmauer, EA; Toro, JJ; Tricot, GJ; White, DJ; Yeh, RF; Yu, LH; Zhao, C, 2014
)
0.66
" Salvage therapy must be tailored according to an individual patient's clinical profile, with the risks and potential effects of treatment-related adverse events being major determinants of the choice of therapy."( Treatment-related adverse events in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Vij, R, 2011
)
0.37
" One of the most significant adverse events is peripheral neuropathy, mainly involving sensory nerve fibers that can lead to withdrawal of treatment."( Toxic effects of bortezomib on primary sensory neurons and Schwann cells of adult mice.
Alé, A; Bruna, J; Herrando, M; Navarro, X; Udina, E, 2015
)
0.76
"To explore the biomarker for predicting the occurrence of adverse events in myeloma patients treated by intravenous bortezomib, we measured proteasome activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells."( Measurement of Proteasome Activity in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells as an Indicator of Susceptibility to Bortezomib-Induced Severe Neurological Adverse Events in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Cho, Y; Fujisawa, F; Hori, M; Kamoshita, M; Katsura, Y; Kojima, H; Komeno, T; Kudo, D; Mukai, HY; Okoshi, Y; Ota, I; Sasaki, K; Shimizu, S; Shinagawa, A; Tanaka, K; Yoshida, C, 2015
)
0.84
" BTZ loaded liposomes showed a significant reduction of drug systemic adverse effects with respect to free drug, even at the highest dose tested."( Tumor vascular targeted liposomal-bortezomib minimizes side effects and increases therapeutic activity in human neuroblastoma.
Brignole, C; Cilli, M; Di Paolo, D; Emionite, L; Loi, M; Marchetti, C; Milelli, A; Minarini, A; Pagnan, G; Parise, A; Pastorino, F; Perri, P; Petretto, A; Piaggio, F; Pistoia, V; Ponzoni, M; Tumiatti, V; Zuccari, G, 2015
)
0.7
" Our data suggest that single-dose gemcitabine together with G-CSF is an effective mobilization regimen in myeloma patients and a safe alternative non-myelosuppressive mobilization chemotherapy for myeloma patients with bortezomib-induced polyneuropathy."( Stem cell mobilization chemotherapy with gemcitabine is effective and safe in myeloma patients with bortezomib-induced neurotoxicity.
Betticher, D; Egger, T; Keller, S; Mansouri Taleghani, B; Mueller, BU; Pabst, T; Rauch, D; Seipel, K, 2016
)
0.84
"Pomalidomide and dexamethasone favored prolonged and safe exposure to treatment in 40% of heavily treated and end-stage RRMM, a paradigm shift in the natural history of RRMM characterized with a succession of shorter disease-free intervals and ultimately shorter survival."( Safe and prolonged survival with long-term exposure to pomalidomide in relapsed/refractory myeloma.
Arnulf, B; Attal, M; Avet-Loiseau, H; Banos, A; Benbouker, L; Brechiniac, S; Caillot, D; Decaux, O; Escoffre-Barbe, M; Facon, T; Fermand, JP; Fouquet, G; Garderet, L; Hulin, C; Karlin, L; Kolb, B; Leleu, X; Macro, M; Marit, G; Mathiot, C; Moreau, P; Pegourie, B; Petillon, MO; Richez, V; Rodon, P; Roussel, M; Royer, B; Stoppa, AM; Wetterwald, M, 2016
)
0.43
"Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose limiting side effect that can lead to long-term morbidity."( Neurotoxicity to DRG neurons varies between rodent strains treated with cisplatin and bortezomib.
Beutler, AS; Kanwar, R; Kulkarni, A; Pleticha, J; Podratz, JL; Staff, NP; Windebank, AJ, 2016
)
0.66
" Complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AE) were combined."( Efficacy and Safety of Novel Agent-Based Therapies for Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis.
Li, Y; Wang, X; Yan, X, 2016
)
0.43
" Response rates, overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse effects were retrospectively analyzed."( [A cohort study comparing the efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus bortezomib, epirubicin and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma].
Chen, H; Hao, QY; Huang, XJ; Liu, KY; Lu, J; Wen, L, 2016
)
0.68
" (4) Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were recorded with a higher number of patients in the PAD group than those in the BD group."( [A cohort study comparing the efficacy and safety of bortezomib plus dexamethasone versus bortezomib, epirubicin and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma].
Chen, H; Hao, QY; Huang, XJ; Liu, KY; Lu, J; Wen, L, 2016
)
0.68
" Areas covered: This review focuses on the safety data from clinical trials for the three approved PIs and how to manage adverse effects."( Safety of proteasome inhibitors for treatment of multiple myeloma.
Lonial, S; Panjic, EH; Schlafer, D; Shah, KS, 2017
)
0.46
" We comprehensively compared the overall response rate (ORR) and the incidence of adverse events between subcutaneous and intravenous bortezomib."( Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
.
Cao, J; Hu, B; Wang, J; Wu, T; Yang, X; Yi, L; Zhou, Q; Zhuang, L, 2017
)
0.91
" The RCTs subgroup did not find statistical differences in these two adverse events."( Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
.
Cao, J; Hu, B; Wang, J; Wu, T; Yang, X; Yi, L; Zhou, Q; Zhuang, L, 2017
)
0.7
" We demonstrated that CK1α inactivation, while toxic for myeloma cells, is dispensable for the survival of healthy B lymphocytes and stromal cells."( Inactivation of CK1α in multiple myeloma empowers drug cytotoxicity by affecting AKT and β-catenin survival signaling pathways.
Barilà, G; Bonaldi, L; Cabrelle, A; Carrino, M; Costacurta, M; Gianesin, K; Macaccaro, P; Manni, S; Manzoni, M; Martines, A; Neri, A; Nunes, SC; Piazza, F; Semenzato, G; Taiana, E; Trentin, L; Tubi, LQ; Zambello, R, 2017
)
0.46
" The common adverse events (AEs) were in line with the well-known toxicity profiles associated with VMP."( A prospective, open-label, multicenter, observational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone as initial treatment for autologous stem cell transplantation-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma.
Bae, SB; Bae, SH; Cho, DY; Choi, CW; Do, YR; Hyun, MS; Jeong, SH; Jo, DY; Joo, YD; Kim, BS; Kim, H; Kim, HG; Kim, HJ; Kim, JA; Kim, JS; Kim, K; Kim, KH; Kim, MK; Kim, SH; Kim, SJ; Kim, SY; Kim, YS; Kwak, JY; Lee, HS; Lee, JH; Lee, JJ; Lee, JO; Lee, MH; Lee, SM; Lee, WS; Lim, SN; Min, CK; Moon, JH; Mun, YC; Nam, SH; Park, JS; Park, KW; Park, MR; Park, SK; Shin, HJ; Song, MK; Yi, HG; Yoon, SS, 2017
)
0.67
" The main concerns on adverse events were thrombosis/embolism events, peripheral neuropathy, and second primary malignancies."( Efficacy and safety of bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide in multiple myeloma: An overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses.
Aguiar, PM; Colleoni, GWB; de Mendonça Lima, T; Storpirtis, S, 2017
)
0.77
"Neurotoxicity is a relevant side effect of bortezomib treatment."( Kinesin-5 Blocker Monastrol Protects Against Bortezomib-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity.
Barham, M; Bobylev, I; Klein, I; Lehmann, HC; Neiss, WF; Peters, D; von Strandmann, EP; Vyas, M, 2017
)
0.98
" Despite this benefit, patients in the panobinostat arm experienced higher rates of adverse events (AEs) and higher rates of discontinuation due to AEs."( Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone: impact of dose intensity and administration frequency on safety in the PANORAMA 1 trial.
Beksac, M; Corrado, C; Dimopoulos, MA; Einsele, H; Elghandour, A; Guenther, A; Hou, J; Hungria, VTM; Jedrzejczak, WW; Lee, JH; Lonial, S; Moreau, P; Na Nakorn, T; Paul, S; Redhu, S; Richardson, PG; Salwender, H; San-Miguel, JF; Schlossman, RL; Siritanaratkul, N; Sopala, M; Yoon, SS, 2017
)
0.79
"Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 oncogene partner N-terminal like gene (FOPNL) rs72773978 polymorphism was identified as an adverse prognostic factor in multiple myeloma (MM)."( The adverse effect of FOPNL genomic variant is reversed by bortezomib-based treatment protocols in multiple myeloma.
Andrikovics, H; Balassa, K; Bors, A; Csacsovszki, O; Kiss, KP; Kovy, P; Kozma, A; Masszi, T; Meggyesi, N; Mikala, G; Remenyi, P; Tordai, A; Valyi-Nagy, I; Varga, G, 2018
)
0.72
" Interestingly, we found that metformin could be used to potentiate the bortezomib-mediated cytotoxicity against PEL cells and to inhibit the activation of KSHV lytic cycle, a side effect of this treatment that resulted in a block of autophagy in these cells."( Metformin triggers apoptosis in PEL cells and alters bortezomib-induced Unfolded Protein Response increasing its cytotoxicity and inhibiting KSHV lytic cycle activation.
Cirone, M; D'Orazi, G; Faggioni, A; Gilardini Montani, MS; Gonnella, R; Granato, M; Romeo, MA; Santarelli, R, 2017
)
0.94
" The most common study drug-related adverse events (all grades) were thrombocytopenia (72%), fatigue (56%), neuropathy (50%), anorexia (44%) and rash (39%)."( Phase I trial of bortezomib daily dose: safety, pharmacokinetic profile, biological effects and early clinical evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Angevin, E; Bahleda, R; Bernard, A; Chaturvedi, S; Deutsch, E; Gazzah, A; Hanley, M; Hollebecque, A; Le Deley, MC; Massard, C; Poterie, A; Ribrag, V; Ricard, D; Sallansonnet-Froment, M; Soria, JC; Taillia, H; Touat, M; Van De Velde, H; Varga, A, 2018
)
0.82
" Interestingly, several adverse effects are less common, compared to BTZ, in patients treated with CFZ."( Milder degenerative effects of Carfilzomib vs. Bortezomib in the Drosophila model: a link to clinical adverse events.
Bagratuni, T; Brieudes, V; Dimopoulos, MA; Florea, BI; Halabalaki, M; Kastritis, E; Overkleeft, HS; Papanagnou, ED; Scorrano, L; Skaltsounis, AL; Terpos, E; Trougakos, IP; Tsakiri, EN, 2017
)
0.71
" All patients (n = 8) experienced Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), with thrombocytopenia (n = 6, 75%) being the most frequent."( Safety and efficacy of daratumumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Aoki, M; Ichinohe, T; Iida, S; Shinagawa, A; Suzuki, K; Takezako, N, 2018
)
0.73
" Adverse events included neutropenia (92/76%), thrombocytopenia (70/10%) and leukopenia (65/50%)."( Efficacy and safety of frontline rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone plus bortezomib (VR-CAP) or vincristine (R-CHOP) in a subset of newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma patients medically eligible for transplantation in the randomized
Belch, A; Bosly, A; Bunworasate, U; Cavalli, F; Dascalescu, A; Drach, J; Farber, C; Huang, H; Masliak, Z; Novak, J; Pei, L; Robak, T; Rooney, B; Samoilova, O; van de Velde, H; Vilchevskaya, K; Zaucha, J, 2018
)
0.7
"In the bortezomib group, four out of eight patients discontinued the trial; three others failed to complete the minimum protocol treatment due to adverse reactions."( Multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bortezomib as a treatment for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus.
Chiu, SW; Fujii, H; Fujita, Y; Harigae, H; Ichinose, K; Ishii, T; Kawakami, A; Saito, K; Shirai, T; Shirota, Y; Tanaka, Y; Watanabe, R; Yamaguchi, T, 2018
)
1.15
"As bortezomib therapy for SLE is associated with many adverse reactions, treatment indications should be selected carefully, and protocols should aim to prevent these occurrences."( Multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bortezomib as a treatment for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus.
Chiu, SW; Fujii, H; Fujita, Y; Harigae, H; Ichinose, K; Ishii, T; Kawakami, A; Saito, K; Shirai, T; Shirota, Y; Tanaka, Y; Watanabe, R; Yamaguchi, T, 2018
)
1.32
" One hundred thirty-seven multiple myeloma patients on maintenance lenalidomide or bortezomib post-auto-HCT who received either MMR or herpes zoster vaccine were analyzed and any adverse events documented in the medical record in the 42 days following vaccination were recorded."( Safety of live-attenuated measles-mumps-rubella and herpes zoster vaccination in multiple myeloma patients on maintenance lenalidomide or bortezomib after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Baden, LR; Hammond, SP; Issa, NC; Laubach, JP; Leblebjian, H; Marty, FM; Pandit, A; Richardson, PG, 2018
)
0.91
" The primary endpoint was adverse events."( Bortezomib is safe in and stabilizes pulmonary function in patients with allo-HSCT-associated pulmonary CGVHD.
Budinger, G; Dematte, J; Duffey, S; Jain, M; Jovanovic, B; Mehta, J, 2018
)
1.92
" We confirmed that overall incidence of adverse events, including peripheral neuropathy, was low, and in no case required admission to emergency service, contributing to reduce the rate of therapy discontinuation."( Safety and comfort of domestic bortezomib injection in real-life experience.
Catalano, L; Cerchione, C; Di Perna, M; Nappi, D; Pane, F; Pareto, AE; Picardi, M; Zacheo, I, 2018
)
0.77
" Carfilzomib (CFZ) has high selectivity and minimal off-target adverse effects including lower rates of PNP."( Efficacy and toxicity profile of carfilzomib based regimens for treatment of multiple myeloma: A systematic review.
Abraham, I; Anwer, F; Iftikhar, A; Kapoor, V; Latif, A; McBride, A; Mushtaq, A; Riaz, IB; Zahid, U, 2018
)
0.48
"The therapeutic efficacy of different doses of dexamethasone combined with bortezomib and thalidomide for patients with multiple myeloma is similar, can obviously enhance remission rate, prolong the survival time, promote life quality, but the incidence of adverse reactions in low dose dexamethason rigemen is significantly reduced, and the safety is better."( [Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Dexamethasone Combined with Bortezomib and Thalidomide for Treating Patients with Multiple Myeloma].
Fu, LP; Ji, Y; Li, CS; Zhang, WP, 2018
)
0.94
" While the addition of panobinostat to bortezomib and dexamethasone has demonstrated response and progression-free survival benefits, the incidence and severity of adverse events associated with it can create a challenge for clinicians and patients."( Incidence and management of adverse events associated with panobinostat in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Arnall, JR; Harvey, RD; Moore, DC, 2019
)
0.78
" Although gastrointestinal disturbances and fatigue are the most common adverse effects, peripheral neuropathy and thrombocytopenia are the key dose-limiting toxicities of bortezomib-based combination regimens."( The safety of bortezomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Beksac, M; Cengiz Seval, G, 2018
)
1.04
"Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is a severe adverse effect in patients receiving antitumor agents, and no effective treatment is available."( High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins reduce nerve macrophage infiltration and the severity of bortezomib-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in rats.
Alberti, P; Ballarini, E; Briani, C; Brivio, R; Canta, A; Carozzi, VA; Cavaletti, G; Chiorazzi, A; Fumagalli, G; Galliani, C; Marjanovic, I; Marmiroli, P; Meregalli, C; Monza, L; Oggioni, N; Pozzi, E; Quartu, M; Rodriguez-Menendez, V; Scali, C; Spinoni, N, 2018
)
0.7
"Our results suggest a prominent role of neuroinflammation in BIPN and that IVIg might be considered as a possible safe and effective therapeutic option preventing M1 macrophage infiltration."( High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins reduce nerve macrophage infiltration and the severity of bortezomib-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in rats.
Alberti, P; Ballarini, E; Briani, C; Brivio, R; Canta, A; Carozzi, VA; Cavaletti, G; Chiorazzi, A; Fumagalli, G; Galliani, C; Marjanovic, I; Marmiroli, P; Meregalli, C; Monza, L; Oggioni, N; Pozzi, E; Quartu, M; Rodriguez-Menendez, V; Scali, C; Spinoni, N, 2018
)
0.7
" Neither cumulative nor transient alterations were found in our metrics, suggesting that bortezomib is safe from a cardiovascular standpoint for patients free of cardiovascular disease."( Bortezomib-based Chemotherapy for Multiple Myeloma Patients Without Comorbid Cardiovascular Disease Shows No Cardiotoxicity.
Broberg, C; Ferencik, M; Heitner, SB; Medvedova, E; Minnier, J; Naher, A; Ritts, A; Scott, EC; Silbermann, R; Van Woerkom, RC, 2018
)
2.15
" We observed minimal adverse effects, mainly hematological toxicity."( A Bortezomib-Based Protocol Induces a High Rate of Complete Remission with Minor Toxicity in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Gatt, ME; Gural, A; Nachmias, B; Shapira, M; Shaulov, A, 2018
)
1.2
" A grade 4 hematological adverse event (AE) was observed in 1 patient."( Efficacy and Safety of a Weekly Cyclophosphamide-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone Regimen as Induction Therapy Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Japanese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Phase 2 Multicenter Trial.
Akiyama, M; Doki, N; Fujio, T; Hori, M; Igarashi, A; Kakihana, K; Kobayashi, T; Kojima, H; Komeno, T; Kudo, D; Kumagai, T; Mukae, J; Najima, Y; Nakamura, Y; Ohashi, K; Okoshi, Y; Saito, T; Shinagawa, A; Takano, H; Tanaka, K; Toyota, S; Tsutsumi, I; Wakimoto, N; Yamamoto, K; Yamamoto, M; Yoshida, C, 2019
)
0.77
" The aggresome pathway has been described as an escape mechanism from proteotoxicity by sequestering toxic cellular aggregates."( Proteasome inhibitor b-AP15 induces enhanced proteotoxicity by inhibiting cytoprotective aggresome formation.
Brnjic, S; D'Arcy, P; Hillert, EK; Linder, S; Mazurkiewicz, M; Mofers, A; Saei, AA; Selvaraju, K; Zhang, X; Zubarev, R, 2019
)
0.51
" Common adverse events included hematological toxicities including neutropenia and lymphopenia; however, the rate of febrile neutropenia was low (3."( Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of daratumumab outside of clinical trials.
Abe, Y; Kitadate, A; Kobayashi, H; Matsue, K; Miura, D; Narita, K; Takeuchi, M; Terao, T; Tsushima, T, 2019
)
0.51
" Exposure-adjusted incidences per 100 patient-years of adverse events (AEs) were 1352."( Carfilzomib-Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Overall Survival, Safety, and Subgroups.
Chng, WJ; Dimopoulos, M; Goldschmidt, H; Kimball, AS; Ludwig, H; Moreau, P; Niesvizky, R; Oriol, A; Orlowski, RZ; Yang, Z, 2019
)
0.8
" Twenty-six (65%) patients experimented adverse events: 8 patients (20%) underwent 12 serious AE (≥grade 3)."( Efficacy and safety of autologous stem cell transplantation after induction therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone.
Arcani, R; Azouza, W; Brunet, C; Colle, J; Costello, R; Fanciullino, R; Farnault, L; Ivanov, V; Lafage, M; Mercier, C; Pourroy, B; Roche, P; Suchon, P; Venton, G, 2019
)
0.73
"Administration of 1 dose of BTZ at peak G-CSF mobilization was safe and well tolerated, enhanced stem cell mobilization, and did not affect graft viability."( A Phase I Study of the Safety and Feasibility of Bortezomib in Combination With G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.
DiPersio, JF; Fiala, MA; Ghobadi, A; Rettig, M; Schroeder, M; Stockerl-Goldstein, K; Uy, GL; Vij, R; Westervelt, P, 2019
)
0.77
" There were 10 fatal infections, and the most frequent adverse events were mild infusion-associated reactions and hematologic toxicities."( Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of daratumumab treatment in Hungarian relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients.
Adamkovich, N; Alizadeh, H; Bereczki, Á; Borbényi, Z; Csacsovszki, O; Csukly, Z; Egyed, M; Farkas, P; Illés, Á; Lovas, S; Masszi, T; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Plander, M; Rajnics, P; Rejtő, L; Schneider, T; Szaleczky, E; Szendrei, T; Szomor, Á; Varga, G; Váróczy, L; Wohner, N; Wolf, K, 2019
)
0.51
" Peripheral neuropathy was the most widely reported adverse event."( The efficacy and safety of bortezomib-based chemotherapy for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bai, M; Dong, R; Li, L; Liu, B; Sun, S; Wang, D; Wang, Y; Zhao, J, 2019
)
0.81
"Current evidence indicates that bortezomib-based regimens might be effective and safe therapies for patients with AL amyloidosis."( The efficacy and safety of bortezomib-based chemotherapy for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bai, M; Dong, R; Li, L; Liu, B; Sun, S; Wang, D; Wang, Y; Zhao, J, 2019
)
1.09
" However, Btz has severe systemic adverse effects, which would limit its use as a bone anabolic agent."( Targeting Bortezomib to Bone Increases Its Bone Anabolic Activity and Reduces Systemic Adverse Effects in Mice.
Boeckman, RK; Boyce, BF; Ebetino, FH; Lin, X; Srinivasan, V; Sun, W; Tao, J; Wang, H; Wu, T; Xing, L; Zhang, H, 2020
)
0.96
" The most common adverse events included diarrhea, fatigue and nausea."( Pilot Trial AMC-063: Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib in AIDS-associated Kaposi Sarcoma.
Aboulafia, D; Ambinder, RF; Dickson, MA; Dittmer, DP; Gorelick, RJ; Lensing, SY; Maldarelli, F; Mitsuyasu, R; Reid, EG; Suazo, A; Wachsman, W, 2020
)
0.82
" Outcomes assessed included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events."( Matching-adjusted Indirect Comparisons of the Efficacy and Safety of Acalabrutinib Versus Other Targeted Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.
Abhyankar, S; Kabadi, SM; Signorovitch, J; Song, J; Telford, C; Yao, Z; Zhao, J, 2019
)
0.51
" However, some patients discontinue VRd because of severe adverse events, despite its high efficacy."( The efficacy and safety of modified bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Abe, Y; Ishida, T; Miyazaki, K; Nashimoto, J; Ogura, M; Okazuka, K; Sato, K; Suzuki, K; Tsukada, N; Uto, Y; Yoshiki, Y, 2020
)
0.83
" In this study, we aimed to identify anticancer agents that increase TLS risk, as classified by a TLS panel consensus, using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database."( Tumor lysis syndrome associated with bortezomib: A post-hoc analysis after signal detection using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
Hotta, Y; Kimura, K; Kondo, M; Nishikawa, R; Sanagawa, A; Tohkin, M, 2020
)
0.83
" PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The testis damage caused by the treatment with bortezomib was not eliminated by (1 → 3)-β-D-glucan and as a result, β-1,3-(D)-glucan enhanced the toxicity by leading a decrease in the levels of GSH, SOD, and CAT, thus caused an elevation in the immunoreactivity of NF-κB and altered the histopathological changes by enhancing the toxic effects of bortezomib."( (1 → 3)-β-d-glucan enhances the toxicity induced by Bortezomib in rat testis.
Abuc, OO; Akaras, N; Atilay, H; Bal, T; Erol, HS; Geyikoglu, F; Gul, M; Koc, K; Yigit, S, 2020
)
1.04
" In this systematic review, associations of the efficacy of each approved regimen with adverse events (AEs) and the total cost per cycle were compared with a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs)."( Association of adverse events and associated cost with efficacy for approved relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma regimens: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials.
Aryal, M; Chhabra, S; D'Souza, A; Dhakal, B; Ghose, S; Giri, S; Hamadani, M; Hari, PN; Janz, S; Narra, RK; Pathak, LK; Smunt, TL; Szabo, A, 2020
)
0.56
" Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with DARA SC in MM and CyBorD."( Daratumumab plus CyBorD for patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis: safety run-in results of ANDROMEDA.
Bumma, N; Comenzo, RL; Jaccard, A; Kastritis, E; Kaufman, JL; Kovacsovics, T; Lee, HC; Maurer, MS; Medvedova, E; Merlini, G; Minnema, MC; Palladini, G; Qin, X; Rosenzweig, M; Sanchorawala, V; Vasey, SY; Vermeulen, J; Wechalekar, AD; Weiss, BM; Zonder, J, 2020
)
0.56
" General and bortezomib-specific adverse events are monitored continuously."( Generate-Boost: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, double-blinded phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of bortezomib in patients with severe autoimmune encephalitis.
Chung, HY; Geis, C; Günther, A; Lehmann, T; Leypoldt, F; Platzer, S; Prüss, H; Scherag, A; Wickel, J, 2020
)
1.13
"Neurotoxicity is a common side effect of chemotherapeutics that often leads to the development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)."( Prokineticin Receptor Inhibition With PC1 Protects Mouse Primary Sensory Neurons From Neurotoxic Effects of Chemotherapeutic Drugs
Amodeo, G; Franchi, S; Kalpachidou, T; Kress, M; Lattanzi, R; Moschetti, G; Sacerdote, P, 2020
)
0.56
" All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with diarrhea (80."( Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Japanese Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed-and-Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Maki, A; Matsumoto, M; Shimada, F; Shimizu, K; Sunami, K; Suzuki, K, 2021
)
0.83
" Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 71 (91%) of 78 patients in the 20 mg three times weekly group, 69 (83%) of 83 patients in the 20 mg twice weekly group, and 60 (75%) of 80 patients in the 10 mg three times weekly group; the most common (≥20% patients in any group) grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33 [42%] of 78, 26 [31%] of 83, and 19 [24%] of 83 patients) and neutropenia (18 [23%], 13 [16%], and six [8%])."( Efficacy and safety of oral panobinostat plus subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (PANORAMA 3): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study.
Abdo, A; Beksac, M; Bladé, J; Chari, A; Dimopoulos, MA; Gonçalves, IZ; Hájek, R; Hungria, VTM; Illés, Á; Jacobasch, L; Laubach, JP; Lech-Maranda, E; Lonial, S; Maison-Blanche, P; Mariz, M; Moreau, P; Polprasert, C; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; San-Miguel, JF; Schjesvold, F; Shelekhova, T; Spencer, A; Spicka, I; Sureda, A; Wróbel, T, 2021
)
0.86
"6% adverse cytogenetics and 25."( Real-world effectiveness and safety of daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Slovakia.
Bátorová, A; Chudej, J; Drgoňa, Ľ; Flochová, E; Guman, T; Harvanová, Ľ; Hlebašková, M; Kubala, J; Ladická, M; Mistrík, M; Simančíková, I; Šimek, M; Štecová, N; Štulajterová, V; Vranovský, A; Wild, A, 2021
)
0.87
" Most common (≥2 patients) grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (12 patients [27%]), rash (4 patients [9%]), lung infection (3 patients [7%]), and increased alanine aminotransferase level (2 patients [4%])."( Safety and Effectiveness of Weekly Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab Combination Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The MANHATTAN Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
Arcila, ME; Caple, J; Chansakul, A; Chung, DJ; Ciardello, A; Concepcion, I; Derkach, A; Diamond, B; Dogan, A; Giralt, SA; Harrison, A; Hassoun, H; Ho, C; Hultcrantz, M; Jones, K; Korde, N; Lahoud, OB; Landau, HJ; Landgren, O; Lesokhin, AM; Lu, SX; Maclaughlan, K; Mailankody, S; Maura, F; Murata, K; Piacentini, C; Ramanathan, L; Rispoli, J; Roshal, M; Rustad, EH; Salcedo, M; Sams, A; Schlossman, J; Scordo, M; Shah, G; Shah, UA; Shekarkhand, T; Tan, C; Tavitian, E; Thoren, K; Verducci, D; Werner, K; Yellapantula, V, 2021
)
0.62
" This study evaluated reports of PN encountered with all three PIs using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event (AE) Reporting System (FAERS)."( Post-Marketing Analysis of Peripheral Neuropathy Burden with New-Generation Proteasome Inhibitors Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
Burns, EA; Hashmi, SK; Mina, SA; Muhsen, IN; Pingali, SR; Sarfraz, H; Xu, J, 2021
)
0.62
" Observational studies based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database analysis and systematic reviews indicate that the incidence of peripheral neuropathy (PN) and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) tends to be higher with bortezomib than that of other drugs."( Comprehensive Analysis of Bortezomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Real-World Database.
Fujiwara, M; Satoki, A; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y, 2022
)
1.21
"The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of bortezomib AEs in Japanese patients and to determine the incidence, time to onset, and post hoc outcomes of unique AEs using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database."( Comprehensive Analysis of Bortezomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Real-World Database.
Fujiwara, M; Satoki, A; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y, 2022
)
1.26
"To investigate the association between bortezomib and AEs, we analyzed the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database, which contains spontaneous AE reports submitted to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency from April 2004 to December 2020."( Comprehensive Analysis of Bortezomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Real-World Database.
Fujiwara, M; Satoki, A; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y, 2022
)
1.29
"The clinical data of elderly patients with MM were retrospectively analyzed, including age, treatment regimen, efficacy, adverse reactions, and the Frailty score included in the activity of daily living score, the instrumental activity of daily living scale and the Charlson comorbidity index."( [Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma under Different Frailty Scores].
Cheng, L; Ma, YP; Song, LM; Xue, R, 2022
)
0.72
" During the induction of bortezomib, the incidence of adverse reactions for the patients in the triple group (78."( [Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Multiple Myeloma under Different Frailty Scores].
Cheng, L; Ma, YP; Song, LM; Xue, R, 2022
)
1.02
"Cancer survivors may experience long-term adverse effects of cancer treatments such as premature ovarian failure and infertility."( Bortezomib-Induced Ovarian Toxicity in Mice.
Monsef, YA; Mutluay, D; Tenekeci, GY, 2022
)
2.16
"For transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, DARA SC (monotherapy/with Rd) was safe and preferred over DARA IV."( Switching to daratumumab SC from IV is safe and preferred by patients with multiple myeloma.
Basu, S; Beksac, M; Carson, R; Cook, G; Delioukina, M; Gries, KS; Kudva, A; Mateos, MV; Pei, H; Rigaudeau, S; Schots, R; Spicka, I; Tromp, B; Van Rampelbergh, R; White, D; Wrobel, T; Wroblewski, S, 2023
)
0.91
"1% had grade 3-4 or higher drug-related adverse reactions, mainly hematological toxicity, and no patients died of adverse reactions."( Efficacy and safety analysis of bortezomib-based triplet regimens sequential lenalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.
Liu, Y; Su, J; Wen, J; Xu, F; Yue, J; Zhang, Y; Zhou, Q, 2023
)
1.19
" Adverse events of grade 3 or worse that occurred with a higher incidence in the carfilzomib-based regimens group compared with the bortezomib-based regimens group were dyspnea, hypertension, acute kidney injury, and heart failure."( Efficacy and toxicity of carfilzomib- or bortezomib-based regimens for treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis.
Huang, J; Liu, Q; Wei, M; Wu, F; Xie, C; Yang, F, 2022
)
1.19
" Selinexor combination therapy is both safe and effective for patients with pretreated RRMM."( Efficacy and safety of selinexor-based regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review of literature.
Davis, JA; Ehsan, H; Hansen, DK; Hashmi, H; Iqbal, Q; Masood, A, 2022
)
0.72
" Altogether, these findings indicate that arginase inhibitors could be further tested as a complementary strategy in multiple myeloma to mitigate adverse cardiac events without compromising antitumor efficacy of proteasome inhibitors."( Targeting arginase-1 exerts antitumor effects in multiple myeloma and mitigates bortezomib-induced cardiotoxicity.
Bany-Laszewicz, U; Barankiewicz, J; Borg, K; Ciepiela, O; Garbicz, F; Golab, J; Grzywa, TM; Juszczynski, P; Kedzierska, H; Lech-Maranda, E; Mackiewicz, U; Maczewski, M; Nowis, D; Okninska, M; Papiernik, D; Paterek, A; Pilch, Z; Pyrzynska, B; Ramji, K; Rodziewicz-Lurzynska, A; Sadowski, R; Sklepkiewicz, P; Sosnowska, A; Staruch, A; Zerrouqi, A, 2022
)
0.95
" BTZ-induced peripheral neuropathy (BIPN) is the most common adverse effect of BTZ with an incidence as high as 40-60%."( Lysosomal dysfunction in Schwann cells is involved in bortezomib-induced peripheral neurotoxicity.
Li, X; Wang, H; Wang, K; Wu, J; Wu, Z; Xu, G; Yan, W; Yang, M; Zhang, X; Zhu, D, 2023
)
1.16
" The risk of cardiac adverse events (CAEs) with PIs has been documented with bortezomib and carfilzomib; however, only a few studies have been reported on ixazomib."( Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors.
Endo, M; Fujiwara, M; Goto, M; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M, 2023
)
1.14
"This study aimed to determine the safety signals of adverse events related to CAEs, the effect of concomitant medications, the time to the occurrence of CAEs, and the incidence of fatal clinical outcomes after the occurrence of CAEs for three PIs using the US Pharmacovigilance database."( Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors.
Endo, M; Fujiwara, M; Goto, M; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M, 2023
)
0.91
"We examined 1,567,240 cases of 231 drugs registered as anticancer drugs in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 1997 to March 2021."( Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors.
Endo, M; Fujiwara, M; Goto, M; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M, 2023
)
0.91
" However, no adverse event CAE signals were observed with ixazomib treatment."( Cardiac Adverse Events Associated with Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors.
Endo, M; Fujiwara, M; Goto, M; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M, 2023
)
0.91
" Our study showed VPd induction is safe and efficacious in NDMM."( Efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: POMACE Phase II Study.
Dubashi, B; Ganesan, P; Halanaik, D; Kar, R; Kayal, S; Nisha, Y; Saj, F, 2023
)
1.18
" The primary outcomes were Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS, measured as time to next treatment), and the secondary outcomes were Adverse Events (AE)."( Real-world effectiveness and safety of multiple myeloma treatments based on thalidomide and bortezomib: A retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2020 in a Brazilian metropolis.
Costa, IHFD; Drummond, PLM; Malta, JS; Menezes de Pádua, CA; Reis, AMM; Santos, RMMD; Silveira, LP, 2023
)
1.13

Pharmacokinetics

Bortezomib is rapidly distributed into tissues after administration of a single dose. Initial plasma distribution half-life of less than 10 minutes, followed by a terminal elimination half- life of more than 40 hours. The greatest magnitude of pharmacodynamic drug interactions occurred at caspase-9, AKT, and Bcl-2.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Bortezomib is rapidly distributed into tissues after administration of a single dose, with an initial plasma distribution half-life of less than 10 minutes, followed by a terminal elimination half-life of more than 40 hours."( Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and practical applications of bortezomib.
Davidson, T; Schwartz, R, 2004
)
1.47
" Pharmacokinetic evaluation showed a biexponential decline, characterized by a rapid distribution followed by a longer elimination, after dose administration, whereas the area under the concentration-time curve increased proportionately with the dose."( Phase I and II pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Ando, K; Hotta, T; Itoh, K; Kagami, Y; Kobayashi, Y; Maruyama, D; Minami, H; Morishima, Y; Nakata, M; Ogawa, Y; Ogura, M; Taji, H; Tobinai, K; Tsuchiya, T; Watanabe, T, 2008
)
0.57
" Pharmacodynamic studies performed included assessment of levels of 20S proteasome activity and ubiquitin-protein conjugates."( A phase I pharmacodynamic trial of bortezomib in combination with doxorubicin in patients with advanced cancer.
Alberti, D; Binger, K; Eickhoff, J; Geiger, P; Heideman, J; Kolesar, J; LoConte, NK; Marnocha, R; Thomas, JP; Utecht, K; Wilding, G, 2008
)
0.62
" pharmacokinetic data on 670 drugs representing, to our knowledge, the largest publicly available set of human clinical pharmacokinetic data."( Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
Lombardo, F; Obach, RS; Waters, NJ, 2008
)
0.35
"This open-label, crossover, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study was conducted at seven institutions in the US and Europe between January 2005 and August 2006."( Effect of the cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumours, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
Acharya, M; Britten, CD; Chan, K; Cohen, N; Dudov, A; Fuloria, J; Gabrail, N; Nemunaitis, J; Quinn, DI; Yee, L, 2009
)
0.57
" Bortezomib pharmacokinetic parameters were similar when bortezomib was administered alone or with omeprazole (maximum plasma concentration 120 vs 123 ng/mL; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 hours 129 vs 135 ng ."( Effect of the cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumours, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.
Acharya, M; Britten, CD; Chan, K; Cohen, N; Dudov, A; Fuloria, J; Gabrail, N; Nemunaitis, J; Quinn, DI; Yee, L, 2009
)
1.48
" Using 20S proteasome inhibition as a pharmacodynamic marker and analyzing bortezomib tumor exposures, we show that efficacy was achieved only when suitable drug exposures drove proteasome inhibition that was sustained over time."( The relationship among tumor architecture, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of bortezomib in mouse xenograft models.
Babcock, T; Bannerman, B; Cao, Y; Hatsis, P; Kupperman, E; Robertson, R; Silva, MD; Terkelsen, J; Williamson, MJ; Xia, C; Yu, L, 2009
)
0.8
" Systemic exposures of bortezomib were similar between dose groups considering the relatively narrow dose range and the observed pharmacokinetic variability, although there was no readily apparent deviation from dose-proportionality."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of two doses of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
Acharya, M; Burris, H; Chatta, G; Karol, M; Keith Stewart, A; Lonial, S; Mohrbacher, AF; Neuwirth, R; Reece, DE; Riordan, WJ; Shustik, C; Sullivan, D; Venkatakrishnan, K; von Moltke, LL; Zannikos, P, 2011
)
0.92
" This study evaluated the effects of co-administration of a potent CYP3A4 inducer (rifampicin [rifampin]) and a weak CYP3A4 inducer (dexamethasone) on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of bortezomib."( Effect of cytochrome P450 3A4 inducers on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Feng, H; Girgis, S; Hellmann, A; Louw, VJ; Patel, H; Rule, S; Shpilberg, O; Skee, DM; van de Velde, H; Walewski, J, 2011
)
0.77
" Blood samples were collected on days 11 through 14 of cycles 2 and 3 before and after bortezomib administration, at prespecified time points, for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (proteasome inhibition) assessments."( Effect of cytochrome P450 3A4 inducers on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profiles of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Feng, H; Girgis, S; Hellmann, A; Louw, VJ; Patel, H; Rule, S; Shpilberg, O; Skee, DM; van de Velde, H; Walewski, J, 2011
)
0.81
" Pharmacokinetic data showed peak plasma levels of ACY-1215 at 4 hours after treatment coincident with an increase in acetylated α-tubulin, a marker of HDAC6 inhibition, by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis."( Preclinical activity, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties of a selective HDAC6 inhibitor, ACY-1215, in combination with bortezomib in multiple myeloma.
Anderson, KC; Bradner, J; Canavese, M; Cirstea, D; Eda, H; Hideshima, T; Jarpe, M; Jones, SS; Kung, AL; Mazitschek, R; Ogier, WC; Raje, N; Rodig, S; Santo, L; Scullen, T; Tamang, D; Tseng, JC; van Duzer, JH; Yang, M, 2012
)
0.58
"The mechanism, preclinical testing, and clinical activity of perifosine in CRC and MM are discussed, with supportive pharmacokinetic information presented."( Perifosine , an oral, anti-cancer agent and inhibitor of the Akt pathway: mechanistic actions, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity.
Anderson, KC; Eng, C; Hideshima, T; Kolesar, J; Richardson, PG, 2012
)
0.38
" Pharmacodynamic analysis showed FLT3 down-regulation on day 26 of cycle 1 (P = ."( Clinical and pharmacodynamic activity of bortezomib and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia.
Bloomfield, CD; Blum, W; Byrd, JC; Caligiuri, MA; Chan, KK; Curfman, JP; Devine, SM; Eisfeld, AK; Garr, C; Garzon, R; Geyer, S; Grever, MR; Jacob, S; Kefauver, C; Klisovic, R; Marcucci, G; Perrotti, D; Santhanam, R; Schwind, S; Tarighat, SS; Walker, A; Wang, H; Whitman, S, 2012
)
0.64
"Data were analysed from the pharmacokinetic substudy of the randomized phase III MMY-3021 study and the phase I CAN-1004 study of subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib in patients aged ≥18 (MMY-3021) or ≤75 (CAN-1004) years with symptomatic relapsed or refractory MM after 1-3 (MMY-3021) or ≥1 (CAN-1004) prior therapies."( Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and covariate analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
Cakana, A; Deraedt, W; Domnikova, N; Doronin, VA; Esseltine, DL; Facon, T; Feng, H; Girgis, S; Hulin, C; Karamanesht, II; Kyselyova, MY; Leleu, X; Moreau, P; Schmidt, A; Skee, D; van de Velde, H; Venkatakrishnan, K; Vilchevska, KV, 2012
)
0.79
" Blood 20S proteasome inhibition pharmacodynamic parameters were also similar with subcutaneous versus intravenous bortezomib: mean maximum effect (E(max)) was 63."( Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and covariate analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
Cakana, A; Deraedt, W; Domnikova, N; Doronin, VA; Esseltine, DL; Facon, T; Feng, H; Girgis, S; Hulin, C; Karamanesht, II; Kyselyova, MY; Leleu, X; Moreau, P; Schmidt, A; Skee, D; van de Velde, H; Venkatakrishnan, K; Vilchevska, KV, 2012
)
0.8
"Subcutaneous administration results in equivalent bortezomib plasma exposure to intravenous administration, together with comparable blood 20S proteasome inhibition pharmacodynamic effects."( Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and covariate analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
Cakana, A; Deraedt, W; Domnikova, N; Doronin, VA; Esseltine, DL; Facon, T; Feng, H; Girgis, S; Hulin, C; Karamanesht, II; Kyselyova, MY; Leleu, X; Moreau, P; Schmidt, A; Skee, D; van de Velde, H; Venkatakrishnan, K; Vilchevska, KV, 2012
)
0.84
"Abstract This phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor 17-allyamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) in combination with bortezomib, and to provide pharmacokinetic data in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( Pharmacokinetics and dose escalation of the heat shock protein inhibitor 17-allyamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in combination with bortezomib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Binkley, P; Blum, KA; Blum, W; Byrd, JC; Garzon, R; Geyer, S; Grever, MR; Jiang, Y; Johnston, JS; Kefauver, C; Klisovic, R; Marcucci, G; Phelps, MA; Walker, AR, 2013
)
0.78
" A pharmacodynamic model was developed that included three critical proteins (phospho-NFκB, BclxL, and cleaved poly (ADP ribose) polymerase)."( Logic-Based and Cellular Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Bortezomib Responses in U266 Human Myeloma Cells.
Abernethy, DR; Chudasama, VL; Mager, DE; Ovacik, MA, 2015
)
0.67
" A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model incorporating tissue drug-target binding was developed to test the hypothesis of proteasome-mediated bortezomib disposition."( Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of target-mediated drug disposition of bortezomib in mice.
Mager, DE; Zhang, L, 2015
)
0.84
" In addition, Cmax was associated with a progression-free survival advantage."( Bortezomib pharmacokinetics in tumor response and peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib-containing therapy.
Choi, K; Han, S; Hong, T; Lee, J; Lee, SE; Min, CK; Park, GJ; Yim, DS, 2017
)
1.9
" We aimed at exploring if daily low dose administration of bortezomib may allow a greater and tolerable pharmacokinetic exposure which might be required for antitumor activity in solid tumors."( Phase I trial of bortezomib daily dose: safety, pharmacokinetic profile, biological effects and early clinical evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Angevin, E; Bahleda, R; Bernard, A; Chaturvedi, S; Deutsch, E; Gazzah, A; Hanley, M; Hollebecque, A; Le Deley, MC; Massard, C; Poterie, A; Ribrag, V; Ricard, D; Sallansonnet-Froment, M; Soria, JC; Taillia, H; Touat, M; Van De Velde, H; Varga, A, 2018
)
1.06
" The pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous bortezomib is characterized by a two-compartment model with a rapid initial distribution phase followed by a longer elimination phase and a large volume of distribution."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bortezomib.
Abdul-Majeed, S; Barta, SK; Cael, B; Tan, CRC, 2019
)
1.03
" Population pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics of intravenous daratumumab in combination therapy versus monotherapy, evaluate the effect of patient- and disease-related covariates on drug disposition, and examine the relationships between daratumumab exposure and efficacy/safety outcomes."( Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses of Daratumumab in Combination Therapy Regimens for Patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Belch, A; Capra, M; Clemens, PL; Dimopoulos, MA; Gomez, D; Ho, PJ; Iida, S; Jansson, R; Leiba, M; Medvedova, E; Min, CK; Schecter, J; Sonneveld, P; Sun, YN; Xu, XS; Zhang, L, 2018
)
0.48
" In this study, a pharmacodynamic systems modeling approach was used to link in vitro bortezomib exposure and myeloma cell death."( Pharmacodynamic Models of Differential Bortezomib Signaling Across Several Cell Lines of Multiple Myeloma.
Mager, DE; Ramakrishnan, V, 2019
)
1.01
" This study illustrates the importance of incorporating target biology, drug-target interactions and in vitro clearance parameters into mechanistic PBPK/PD models and the utility of such models for pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and DDI predictions."( A Translational Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Framework of Target-Mediated Disposition, Target Inhibition and Drug-Drug Interactions of Bortezomib.
Hanley, M; Iwasaki, S; Venkatakrishnan, K; Xia, C; Zhu, A, 2020
)
0.75
" Simulations revealed that the greatest magnitude of pharmacodynamic drug interactions between bortezomib and vorinostat occurred at caspase-9, AKT, and Bcl-2."( Cluster Gauss-Newton and CellNOpt Parameter Estimation in a Small Protein Signaling Network of Vorinostat and Bortezomib Pharmacodynamics.
Chen, T; Ghasemi, M; Mager, DE; Nguyen, VA; Niu, J, 2021
)
1.05
" The popPK analysis included pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity data from patients receiving daratumumab SC in combination with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in the ANDROMEDA study (AMY3001; safety run-in, n = 28; randomized phase, n = 183)."( Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Modeling of Daratumumab Subcutaneous Administration in Patients With Light-Chain Amyloidosis.
Comenzo, RL; Kastritis, E; Luo, MM; Merlini, G; Nnane, I; Qin, X; Sharma, A; Sun, YN; Tran, N; Vermeulen, J; Wechalekar, AD; Weiss, BM; Xiong, Y; Zhou, H; Zhu, PP, 2022
)
0.93
" Pharmacokinetic profiles and pharmacodynamic analysis were performed to determine the change in tumor weight associated with the use of proteasome inhibitors."( Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics Modeling and Evaluation of Tumor Response to Bortezomib Proteasome Inhibitor in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia.
Bhatti, AI; Fazal, S; Munir, A; Sajjad, B, 2023
)
1.14

Compound-Compound Interactions

Liposomal doxorubicin received FDA approval for use in combination with bortezomib. The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities. Findings from preclinical studies prompted a Phase I trial.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Bortezomib and TRAIL represent a synergistic drug combination that warrants further evaluation in in vivo models of prostate cancer."( Drug interactions between the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and cytotoxic chemotherapy, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in prostate cancer.
Adams, J; An, J; Belldegrun, A; Fisher, M; Rettig, MB; Sun, YP, 2003
)
2.01
"Bortezomib improves efficacy in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin in NSCLC, but sequential effects are important and must be considered when developing therapeutic regimens."( Effects of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib alone and in combination with chemotherapy in the A549 non-small-cell lung cancer cell line.
Bold, RJ; Mortenson, MM; Schlieman, MG; Virudachalam, S, 2004
)
2.04
"3 mg/m2 IV days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 3 weeks for eight cycles in combination with dexamethasone."( Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma.
Berdel, WE; Bisping, G; Kienast, J; Kropff, MH; Tchinda, J; Volpert, S; Wenning, D, 2005
)
1.77
"The anti-tumour in vitro activity of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (PS-341, VELCADE) in combination with purine nucleoside analogues, cladribine (2-CdA) and fludarabine (FA) was tested in lymphocytes derived from 26 patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL)."( In vitro cytotoxic effect of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in combination with purine nucleoside analogues on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells.
Cebula, B; Duechler, M; Linke, A; Robak, T; Schwarzmeier, JD; Shehata, M; Smolewski, P, 2005
)
0.83
" The observed increase was especially evident when 5 nm of bortezomib were combined with suboptimal doses of 2-CdA or FA."( In vitro cytotoxic effect of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in combination with purine nucleoside analogues on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells.
Cebula, B; Duechler, M; Linke, A; Robak, T; Schwarzmeier, JD; Shehata, M; Smolewski, P, 2005
)
0.82
"Bortezomib, as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone, was examined as first-line treatment in 32 consecutive patients with untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma."( Bortezomib therapy alone and in combination with dexamethasone for previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma.
Camacho, E; Crowley, J; Durie, BG; Gabayan, E; Irwin, D; Jagannath, S; Lutzky, J; Mazumder, A; McKinley, M; Schenkein, D; Wolf, J, 2005
)
3.21
" To address the likelihood of clinical drug-drug interactions, the P450 inhibition potential of bortezomib and its major deboronated metabolites M1 and M2 and their dealkylated metabolites M3 and M4 was evaluated in human liver microsomes for the major P450 isoforms 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4/5."( Investigation of drug-drug interaction potential of bortezomib in vivo in female Sprague-Dawley rats and in vitro in human liver microsomes.
Gallegos, R; Gan, LS; Li, P; Lu, C; Miwa, GT; Nix, D; Pusalkar, S; Uttamsingh, V; Xia, CQ, 2006
)
0.8
" We studied the in vitro cytotoxic effects of BOR in combination with anti-CD20 (rituximab, RIT) or anti-CD52 (campath, CAM) monoclonal antibodies on B-CLL cells."( Additive cytotoxic effect of bortezomib in combination with anti-CD20 or anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies on chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells.
Cebula, B; Duechler, M; Grzybowska-Izydorczyk, O; Linke, A; Robak, T; Shehata, M; Smolewski, P, 2006
)
0.63
"We present here a case of severe, but reversible, congestive cardiac failure in a lung cancer patient who had no prior cardiac history, after receiving an experimental treatment of bortezomib combined with chemotherapy."( Severe reversible cardiac failure after bortezomib treatment combined with chemotherapy in a non-small cell lung cancer patient: a case report.
Giaccone, G; Voortman, J, 2006
)
0.79
" Two different treatment schedules of bortezomib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin were tested in this phase I study to evaluate the effects of scheduling on toxicities, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity."( A phase I and pharmacologic study of sequences of the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade), in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced malignancies.
Adjei, AA; Alberts, SR; Bruzek, L; Croghan, GA; Erlichman, C; Hanson, LJ; Jatoi, A; Ma, C; Mandrekar, SJ; Pitot, HC; Reid, JM; Tan, AD; Wright, JJ, 2007
)
0.84
" Findings from preclinical studies prompted a Phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with recurring/refractory advanced solid tumors."( Phase I clinical trial of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Appleman, LJ; Clark, JW; Cusack, J; Eder, JP; Enzinger, PC; Fidias, P; Fishman, M; Kashala, O; Lynch, T; Ryan, DP; Supko, JG; Zhu, AX, 2006
)
0.83
"Bortezomib has modest single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced NSCLC using this schedule, with minor enhancement in combination with docetaxel."( Randomized phase II study of bortezomib alone and bortezomib in combination with docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Akerley, W; Axelrod, R; Belt, R; Carbone, DP; Crawford, J; Fanucchi, MP; Fidias, P; Fossella, FV; Govindan, R; Kashala, O; Kelly, K; Limentani, SA; Natale, R; Raez, LE; Reimers, HJ; Ribeiro, M; Robert, F; Schiller, JH; Sheng, S, 2006
)
2.07
"To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma(MM)."( [Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma].
Chen, YB; Fu, WJ; Hou, J; Xi, H; Yang, SL; Yuan, ZG; Zhou, F, 2006
)
1.51
"Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone is an effective therapy with a high response rate and manageable toxicities for patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma."( [Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma].
Chen, YB; Fu, WJ; Hou, J; Xi, H; Yang, SL; Yuan, ZG; Zhou, F, 2006
)
2.69
"The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 (Bortezomib, Velcade) is currently being combined with taxanes in several clinical trials for treatment of patients with various solid tumors including lung cancers."( Assessment of apoptosis-inducing effects of docetaxel combined with the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in human lung cancer cells.
Jung, CS; Khuri, FR; Sun, SY; Zhou, Z, 2007
)
0.62
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of bortezomib alone and in combination with harringtonine on apoptosis of HL-60 cells."( [Induction of apoptosis in HL-60 cells by bortezomib alone or in combination with harringtonine in vitro].
Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2007
)
0.85
" Furthermore, early phase I/II clinical trials have shown impressive activity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and conventional doxorubicin in combination with bortezomib in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory myeloma."( Emerging data on the use of anthracyclines in combination with bortezomib in multiple myeloma.
Orlowski, RZ; Voorhees, PM, 2007
)
0.78
"To establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and tolerability of two schedules of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors."( A parallel dose-escalation study of weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.
Giaccone, G; Honeywell, R; Kuenen, BC; Peters, GJ; Smit, EF; van de Velde, H; Voortman, J, 2007
)
0.81
" Bortezomib combined with DEX and CY is a highly effective treatment for relapsed MM at an acceptable rate of grade 3/4 AE."( Bortezomib in combination with intermediate-dose dexamethasone and continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide for relapsed multiple myeloma.
Berdel, WE; Bisping, G; Dechow, T; Einsele, H; Engelhardt, M; Heinecke, A; Hentrich, M; Kienast, J; Kröger, N; Kropff, M; Lang, N; Liebisch, P; Metzner, B; Salwender, H; Schuck, E; Sezer, O; Volpert, S; Wolf, HH, 2007
)
2.69
"To investigate the effect of bortezomib alone and in combination with arsenic trioxide on apoptosis of HL-60 cells."( [HL-60 cell apoptosis induced by bortezomib alone or in combination with arsenic trioxide in vitro].
Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX; Tian, S, 2007
)
0.91
"HL-60 cells were treated with bortezomib alone or in combination with arsenic trioxide for 12 to 48 h and the cell proliferation was analyzed with MTT assay, and cell apoptosis detected by DNA gel electrophoresis, fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry."( [HL-60 cell apoptosis induced by bortezomib alone or in combination with arsenic trioxide in vitro].
Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX; Tian, S, 2007
)
0.91
"Dose escalation studies were performed with eight squamous cell carcinoma cell lines using bortezomib alone or in combination with TAX or CDDP."( Antiproliferative activity of bortezomib alone and in combination with cisplatin or docetaxel in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.
Ackermann, H; Baghi, M; Gstöttner, W; Hambek, M; Knecht, R; Strebhardt, K; Wagenblast, J, 2008
)
0.86
"To investigate the antiproliferative effect of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor MS-275 on cholangiocarcinoma cells alone and in combination with conventional cytostatic drugs (gemcitabine or doxorubicin) or the novel anticancer agents sorafenib or bortezomib."( Histone deacetylase inhibitor MS-275 alone or combined with bortezomib or sorafenib exhibits strong antiproliferative action in human cholangiocarcinoma cells.
Baradari, V; Höpfner, M; Huether, A; Scherübl, H; Schuppan, D, 2007
)
0.76
" Furthermore, additive anti-neoplastic effects were observed when MS-275 treatment was combined with gemcitabine or doxorubicin, while combination with the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib or the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib resulted in overadditive anti-neoplastic effects."( Histone deacetylase inhibitor MS-275 alone or combined with bortezomib or sorafenib exhibits strong antiproliferative action in human cholangiocarcinoma cells.
Baradari, V; Höpfner, M; Huether, A; Scherübl, H; Schuppan, D, 2007
)
0.77
"The growth of human cholangiocarcinoma cells can be potently inhibited by MS-275 alone or in combination with conventional cytostatic drugs or new, targeted anticancer agents."( Histone deacetylase inhibitor MS-275 alone or combined with bortezomib or sorafenib exhibits strong antiproliferative action in human cholangiocarcinoma cells.
Baradari, V; Höpfner, M; Huether, A; Scherübl, H; Schuppan, D, 2007
)
0.58
" Here, we demonstrate its efficacy, both alone and in combination with other cytotoxic agents, in gastric cancer cell lines."( Antitumor effects and drug interactions of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (PS341) in gastric cancer cells.
Doihara, H; Fujita, T; Ino, H; Murakami, M; Naito, M; Shimizu, N; Washio, K, 2007
)
0.58
"This phase I trial evaluated the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib when combined with carboplatin in ovarian cancer patients with recurrent and platinum- and taxane-resistant disease."( Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in combination with carboplatin in patients with platinum- and taxane-resistant ovarian cancer.
Coleman, RL; Gershenson, DM; Johnston, TA; Landen, CN; Levenback, C; Milam, MR; Ramirez, PT, 2008
)
0.82
"To assess the antitumor efficacy and adverse effects of bortezomib either used alone or in combination with arsenic trioxide for transplanted tumor in nude mice."( [Effect of bortezomib used alone or in combination with arsenic trioxide on HL-60 cell xenograft in nude mice].
Cai, YX; Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2007
)
0.98
"Bortezomib alone and in combination with arsenic trioxide could both inhibit the growth of the transplanted tumors, prolong the survival of the nude mice, and induce cell apoptosis and growth inhibition of the HL-60 cells in vivo, and the combined administration exhibited even better effects."( [Effect of bortezomib used alone or in combination with arsenic trioxide on HL-60 cell xenograft in nude mice].
Cai, YX; Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2007
)
2.17
"Bortezomib in combination with arsenic trioxide has significant antitumor effect in nude mice bearing HL-60 cell xenografts possibly by inducing HL-60 cell apoptosis and growth inhibition without producing no significant adverse effects."( [Effect of bortezomib used alone or in combination with arsenic trioxide on HL-60 cell xenograft in nude mice].
Cai, YX; Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2007
)
2.17
" The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities of bortezomib in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors."( Bortezomib in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I trial.
Chaudhary, U; Dunder, S; Green, M; Hayslip, J; Kraft, A; Meyer, M; Montero, AJ; Salzer, S; Sherman, C, 2007
)
2
"Patients received escalating doses of bortezomib either on a weekly schedule (days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 repeated every 42 days) or on a twice-weekly administration schedule (days 1, 4, 8, and 11 repeated every 21 days), in combination with escalating doses of celecoxib twice daily throughout the study period from 200 mg to 400 mg twice daily."( Bortezomib in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I trial.
Chaudhary, U; Dunder, S; Green, M; Hayslip, J; Kraft, A; Meyer, M; Montero, AJ; Salzer, S; Sherman, C, 2007
)
2.05
"On May 17, 2007, doxorubicin HCl liposome injection (Doxil) in combination with bortezomib (Velcade) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least one prior therapy that has not included bortezomib."( Liposomal doxorubicin in combination with bortezomib for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Dagher, R; Farrell, AT; He, K; Justice, R; Ning, YM; Pazdur, R; Sridhara, R, 2007
)
0.83
"Liposomal doxorubicin received FDA approval for use in combination with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma who have not previously received bortezomib and have received at least one prior therapy."( Liposomal doxorubicin in combination with bortezomib for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Dagher, R; Farrell, AT; He, K; Justice, R; Ning, YM; Pazdur, R; Sridhara, R, 2007
)
0.84
" Thirty-two patients were treated with bortezomib alone and 25 were treated with chemotherapeutic agents that were given in combination with bortezomib."( Bortezomib in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic agents for multiple myeloma compared with bortezomib alone.
Eom, KS; Han, K; Kim, CC; Kim, M; Kim, Y; Lee, JW; Lee, MJ; Lee, S; Lim, J; Min, CK; Min, WS, 2007
)
2.05
" In patients who received bortezomib combined with chemotherapeutic agents, 19 out of 25 patients (76%) showed an EOR, whereas 12 out of 32 patients (37."( Bortezomib in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic agents for multiple myeloma compared with bortezomib alone.
Eom, KS; Han, K; Kim, CC; Kim, M; Kim, Y; Lee, JW; Lee, MJ; Lee, S; Lim, J; Min, CK; Min, WS, 2007
)
2.08
"Bortezomib in combination with common chemotherapeutic agents is more active in the treatment of relapsed, refractory MM than with bortezomib alone."( Bortezomib in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic agents for multiple myeloma compared with bortezomib alone.
Eom, KS; Han, K; Kim, CC; Kim, M; Kim, Y; Lee, JW; Lee, MJ; Lee, S; Lim, J; Min, CK; Min, WS, 2007
)
3.23
" We conducted a phase I study of gemcitabine and carboplatin in combination with bortezomib."( The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a California Cancer Consortium Phase I study.
Bold, R; Davies, AM; Gandara, DR; Gumerlock, PH; Lara, PN; Lau, DH; Lenz, HJ; Ruel, C; Schenkein, DP; Shibata, S, 2008
)
0.88
" We propose that this novel drug combination should receive further evaluation as a potentially effective anticancer therapy."( Aggravated endoplasmic reticulum stress as a basis for enhanced glioblastoma cell killing by bortezomib in combination with celecoxib or its non-coxib analogue, 2,5-dimethyl-celecoxib.
Chen, TC; Golden, EB; Hofman, FM; Kardosh, A; Louie, SG; Petasis, NA; Pyrko, P; Schönthal, AH; Uddin, J, 2008
)
0.57
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of arsenic trioxide (As(2)O(3)) combined with bortezomib on the proliferation, apoptosis and beta-catenin level in myeloma cell lines."( [Effect of arsenic trioxide combined with bortezomib on proliferation, apoptosis and beta-catenin level in myeloma cell lines].
Fu, WJ; Hou, J; Wang, DX; Yuan, ZG; Zhou, LL, 2008
)
0.83
" No dose-limiting toxicities were noted at all bortezomib dose levels when administered with full dose capecitabine and oxaliplatin."( Phase I study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Beard, M; Cohen, SJ; Engstrom, PF; Langer, CJ; Lewis, NL; McLaughlin, S; Meropol, NJ; Weiner, LM, 2008
)
0.82
"Weekly bortezomib can be safely combined with full doses of capecitabine and oxaliplatin."( Phase I study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Beard, M; Cohen, SJ; Engstrom, PF; Langer, CJ; Lewis, NL; McLaughlin, S; Meropol, NJ; Weiner, LM, 2008
)
1.02
" Here we examined the sensitivity of bone marrow cells from AML patients (34 patients: 25 newly diagnosed, 4 relapsed, 5 refractory) to bortezomib alone or in combination with TRAIL, a member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis in tumor cells while sparing normal cells."( Antitumor activity of bortezomib alone and in combination with TRAIL in human acute myeloid leukemia.
Adamo, L; Anastasi, G; Caruso, L; Conticello, C; Cupri, A; De Maria, R; Di Raimondo, F; Giuffrida, R; Giustolisi, R; Gulisano, M; Iannolo, G; Moschetti, G; Palumbo, GA; Vicari, L, 2008
)
0.86
" Bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone was administered as first-line treatment in all 7 newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma."( [Clinical study of bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of multiple myeloma].
Li, JY; Lu, H; Qian, SX; Qiu, HX; Shen, WY; Wang, LX; Wu, HX; Wu, YJ; Zhang, JF, 2008
)
1.58
" In this study, escalating doses of Bortezomib were administered along with the standard FOLFOX-4 doses, in order to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), toxicity profile and activity of the combination."( An EORTC phase I study of Bortezomib in combination with oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
Anthoney, A; Bauer, J; Caponigro, F; Govaerts, AS; Lacombe, D; Marréaud, S; Milano, A; Twelves, C, 2009
)
0.93
"To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib of different doses in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."( [Effects of bortezomib at different doses in combination with dexamethasone in treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a comparative study].
Bao, L; Huang, XJ; Lu, XJ; Zhang, XH, 2008
)
0.99
"The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bortezomib combined with epirubicin, dexamethasone, and thalidomide (BADT) for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM)."( Bortezomib in combination with epirubicin, dexamethasone and thalidomide is a highly effective regimen in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a single-center experience.
Hu, X; Huang, C; Lü, S; Ni, X; Qiu, H; Wang, J; Xu, X; Yang, J, 2009
)
2.03
" Importantly, tumor cells that are partially or completely resistant to mapatumumab or lexatumumab can often be sensitized when treated in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs."( Mapatumumab and lexatumumab induce apoptosis in TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 antibody-resistant NSCLC cell lines when treated in combination with bortezomib.
Carrell, JA; Humphreys, R; Luster, TA; McCormick, K; Sun, D, 2009
)
0.56
"To investigate the effect of bortezomib alone or combined with harringtonine (HT) or arsenic trioxide (As2O3) on the proliferation capacity and apoptosis of HL-60/ADM cell line and fresh cells from refractory/relapse acute leukemia patients."( [In vitro effect of bortezomib alone or in combination with harringtonine or arsenic trioxide on proliferation and apoptosis of multidrug resistant leukemia cells].
Cai, YX; Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2008
)
0.96
"HL-60/ADM cells or refractory/relapse leukemia cells were incubated with bortezomib at different doses alone and in combination with HT or As2O3."( [In vitro effect of bortezomib alone or in combination with harringtonine or arsenic trioxide on proliferation and apoptosis of multidrug resistant leukemia cells].
Cai, YX; Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2008
)
0.9
" 15 micromol/L As2O3 or 752 nmol/L HT combined with different doses of bortezomib could inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of HL-60/ADM cells."( [In vitro effect of bortezomib alone or in combination with harringtonine or arsenic trioxide on proliferation and apoptosis of multidrug resistant leukemia cells].
Cai, YX; Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2008
)
0.9
"Bortezomib can inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of HL-60/ADM cells and fresh refractory/relapse acute leukemia cells, especially combined with HT or As2O3."( [In vitro effect of bortezomib alone or in combination with harringtonine or arsenic trioxide on proliferation and apoptosis of multidrug resistant leukemia cells].
Cai, YX; Fu, YB; Li, L; Meng, FY; Sun, QX, 2008
)
2.11
" 60 MM patients including 19 de novo patients, out of them 14 patients received the treatment using regimen of bortezomib in combination with thalidomide (BT), 5 patients received bortezomib-methylprednisolone regimen (BMP)."( [Bortezomib combined with other drugs for treating 60 cases of multiple myeloma].
Chen, SL; Hu, Y; Li, X; Zhang, JJ; Zhong, YP, 2009
)
1.47
"A clinical trial was initiated to evaluate the recommended dose of cyclophosphamide in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone as induction treatment before stem cell transplantation for younger patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM)."( DSMM XI study: dose definition for intravenous cyclophosphamide in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone for remission induction in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.
Berdel, WE; Einsele, H; Gann, CN; Knop, S; Kropff, M; Liebisch, P; Wand, H; Weisel, K, 2009
)
0.79
" Other research groups showed that histone deacetylase inhibitors (valproic acid or benzamide derivative MS-275) in combination with NPI-0052 or PR-171 induced greater levels of acute leukemia cell death than in combination with bortezomib."( Antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects of proteasome inhibitors and their combination with histone deacetylase inhibitors on leukemia cells.
Fuchs, O; Kuzelova, K; Marinov, I; Provaznikova, D; Spicka, I, 2009
)
0.54
"Novel agents have demonstrated enhanced efficacy when combined with other antimyeloma agents especially dexamethasone."( Bortezomib in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and thalidomide is an effective steroid independent salvage regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: results of a phase II clinical trial.
Ailawadhi, S; Barcos, M; Bernstein, ZP; Chanan-Khan, A; Czuczman, MS; Iancu, D; Lee, K; Miller, KC; Mohr, A; Musial, L; Padmanabhan, S; Patel, M; Sher, T; Yu, J, 2009
)
1.8
" The present study investigated the effect of bortezomib alone or in combination with a hydroxamate-based histone deacetylase inhibitor, JNJ-26481585 on tumor burden, and MM bone disease in the 5T2MM model."( Bortezomib alone or in combination with the histone deacetylase inhibitor JNJ-26481585: effect on myeloma bone disease in the 5T2MM murine model of myeloma.
Arts, J; Coulton, L; Croucher, P; De Raeve, H; Deleu, S; Lemaire, M; Menu, E; Van Camp, B; Van Valckenborgh, E; Vande Broek, I; Vanderkerken, K, 2009
)
2.05
" We report on the extended follow-up of a phase II study in frontline MM of bortezomib alone and in combination with dexamethasone."( Extended follow-up of a phase 2 trial of bortezomib alone and in combination with dexamethasone for the frontline treatment of multiple myeloma.
Camacho, ES; Crowley, J; Durie, BG; Gabayan, AE; Irwin, D; Jagannath, S; Lutzky, J; Mazumder, A; McKinley, M; Potts, P; Vescio, R; Wolf, JL, 2009
)
0.85
"A phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bortezomib (B) when combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors."( A dose-finding and pharmacodynamic study of bortezomib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Bekaii-Saab, T; Byrd, JC; Culler, K; Grever, MR; Lesinski, GB; Lucas, DM; Ramaswamy, B; Ruppert, AS; Schaaf, LJ; Shapiro, CL; Wilkins, D; Wright, JJ; Young, DC, 2010
)
0.86
" Preliminary reports from phase I trials using bortezomib in combination with some of these standard cytotoxics have not found any pharmacologic interactions, and toxicities were not significantly increased with these regimens."( Bortezomib in combination with other therapies for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Orlowski, RZ, 2004
)
2.02
"To evaluate the effects and safety of the regimen of bortezomib combined with dexamethasone (VD) in the treatment of primary systemic (AL) amyloidosis."( [The effects and safety of bortezomib combined with dexamethasone in the treatment of primary systemic amyloidosis].
Li, J; Su, C; Wang, HH; Zeng, LJ; Zhao, Y, 2009
)
0.9
"82 ng/ml, but the IC(50) of Jurkat cells treated with bortezomib combined with adriamycin (125 ng/ml) for 24 h was significantly decreased to 20."( [Apoptosis in Jurkat cells induced by bortezomib combined with adriamycin].
Chen, JF; Jin, J, 2009
)
0.87
" The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy and radiation."( A phase I study of bortezomib in combination with standard 5-fluorouracil and external-beam radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic rectal cancer.
Bernard, SA; Calvo, BF; Caskey, LS; Chakravarthy, AB; Chan, E; Goldberg, RM; Ivanova, A; Kim, HJ; Myers, MO; O'Neil, BH; Raftery, L; Sanoff, HK; Tepper, JE; Wise, PE, 2010
)
0.92
"The MTD of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy and radiation may be below a clinically relevant dose, limiting the clinical applicability of this combination."( A phase I study of bortezomib in combination with standard 5-fluorouracil and external-beam radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic rectal cancer.
Bernard, SA; Calvo, BF; Caskey, LS; Chakravarthy, AB; Chan, E; Goldberg, RM; Ivanova, A; Kim, HJ; Myers, MO; O'Neil, BH; Raftery, L; Sanoff, HK; Tepper, JE; Wise, PE, 2010
)
1.08
" The apoptotic activity of these molecules, alone or in combination with tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and/or Bortezomib, was tested in melanoma cell lines by MTT viability assays and western blot analysis of activated caspases."( Novel SMAC-mimetics synergistically stimulate melanoma cell death in combination with TRAIL and Bortezomib.
Anichini, A; Bolognesi, M; Delia, D; Drago, C; Kashkar, H; Lecis, D; Manzoni, L; Mastrangelo, E; Scolastico, C; Seneci, P; Walczak, H, 2010
)
0.78
" With the purpose of evaluating whether the combination of ATO and bortezomib would be an option for patients with acute leukemia, we incubated HL60 leukemic cells with ATO alone and in combination with bortezomib."( Synergistic antiproliferative effect of arsenic trioxide combined with bortezomib in HL60 cell line and primary blasts from patients affected by myeloproliferative disorders.
Canestraro, M; Cine, N; Galimberti, S; Guerrini, F; Metelli, MR; Nagy, B; Palumbo, GA; Petrini, M; Piaggi, S; Savli, H; Tibullo, D, 2010
)
0.83
" Bortezomib has shown single agent activity of 33% in relapsed MCL and has an additive/synergistic effect in vitro when combined with drugs currently used to treat MCL."( Phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with rituximab-HyperCVAD alternating with rituximab, methotrexate and cytarabine for untreated aggressive mantle cell lymphoma.
Fayad, LE; Feldman, T; Ford, P; Goldberg, S; Goy, A; Hartig, K; Kwak, LW; McLaughlin, P; Pecora, A; Pro, B; Rodriguez, A; Romaguera, JE; Smith, J; Wang, M; Weaver, P, 2010
)
1.61
"Velcade combined with dexamethasone is a safe and effective regiment for multiple myeloma with good safety and endurance."( [Effect of Velcade combined with Dexamethasone on multiple myeloma].
He, Q; He, Y; Tan, D; Zhao, X, 2010
)
0.36
" We underwent a dose finding study of bortezomib in combination with a fixed dose of doxorubicin and intermediate-dose dexamethasone (iPAD therapy) in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma."( A phase I study of bortezomib in combination with doxorubicin and intermediate-dose dexamethasone (iPAD therapy) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Choi, I; Hata, H; Higuchi, M; Masaki, Y; Nagafuji, K; Sunami, K; Takamatsu, Y; Tamura, K; Uozumi, K, 2010
)
0.96
" Finally, we show an additive effect of arsenic trioxide on apoptosis when used in combination with ZOL."( The proapoptotic effect of zoledronic acid is independent of either the bone microenvironment or the intrinsic resistance to bortezomib of myeloma cells and is enhanced by the combination with arsenic trioxide.
Abeltino, M; Agnelli, L; Bolzoni, M; Bonomini, S; Colla, S; Giuliani, N; Neri, A; Rizzoli, V; Storti, P; Todoerti, K, 2011
)
0.58
"Our in vitro data suggest that the use of ZOL at appropriate doses could be explored clinically in bortezomib-resistant MM patients and combined with arsenic trioxide to increase its proapoptotic effect."( The proapoptotic effect of zoledronic acid is independent of either the bone microenvironment or the intrinsic resistance to bortezomib of myeloma cells and is enhanced by the combination with arsenic trioxide.
Abeltino, M; Agnelli, L; Bolzoni, M; Bonomini, S; Colla, S; Giuliani, N; Neri, A; Rizzoli, V; Storti, P; Todoerti, K, 2011
)
0.79
"To determine the safety, target inhibition, and signals of clinical activity of tipifarnib in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced acute leukemias."( A phase I clinical-pharmacodynamic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in advanced acute leukemias.
Blaskovich, MA; Burton, M; Cubitt, C; Duong, VH; Lancet, JE; Sebti, S; Stuart, RK; Sullivan, DM; Winton, EF; Wright, JJ; Zhang, S, 2011
)
0.78
"To assess effects of proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib (Bor) in combination with Daunorubicin (DNR) on proliferation, apoptosis and the expression of Bcl-2 mRNA in primary leukemia cells in vitro."( [Effects of bortezomib combined with daunorubicin on proliferation and apoptosis in primary adult acute leukemia].
Gong, YP; Yang, X; Zheng, BH; Zhou, RQ, 2010
)
1
" Combined with Bor (5, 10 nmol/L),the IC50 of DNR decreased from (102 +/- 27) nmol/L to (73 +/- 26), (55 +/- 22) nmol/L respectively."( [Effects of bortezomib combined with daunorubicin on proliferation and apoptosis in primary adult acute leukemia].
Gong, YP; Yang, X; Zheng, BH; Zhou, RQ, 2010
)
0.74
"Bor combined with DNR shows synergetic effect in promoting the apoptosis of adult acute leukemia primary cells as well as inhibitory effect on the proliferation of leukemia cells."( [Effects of bortezomib combined with daunorubicin on proliferation and apoptosis in primary adult acute leukemia].
Gong, YP; Yang, X; Zheng, BH; Zhou, RQ, 2010
)
0.74
" The MTD was determined to be 1·6 mg/m(2) bortezomib on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in combination with 25 mg temsirolimus on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, for a cycle of 35 days."( Weekly bortezomib in combination with temsirolimus in relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, phase 1/2, open-label, dose-escalation study.
Anderson, KC; Armand, P; Bagshaw, M; Banwait, R; Chuma, S; Dollard, A; Ghobrial, IM; Harris, B; Jakubowiak, AJ; Kunsman, J; Laubach, J; Leduc, R; Maiso, P; Munshi, NC; Poon, T; Richardson, PG; Roccaro, A; Rodig, S; Sam, A; Schlossman, R; Vij, R; Warren, D; Weller, E, 2011
)
1.09
"mTOR inhibitors could have a role in combination with weekly bortezomib for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma without the addition of steroids."( Weekly bortezomib in combination with temsirolimus in relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a multicentre, phase 1/2, open-label, dose-escalation study.
Anderson, KC; Armand, P; Bagshaw, M; Banwait, R; Chuma, S; Dollard, A; Ghobrial, IM; Harris, B; Jakubowiak, AJ; Kunsman, J; Laubach, J; Leduc, R; Maiso, P; Munshi, NC; Poon, T; Richardson, PG; Roccaro, A; Rodig, S; Sam, A; Schlossman, R; Vij, R; Warren, D; Weller, E, 2011
)
1.07
" Antitumor activity of bortezomib in combination with EGCG or ascorbic acid was determined using several dosing regimens to evaluate different target plasma concentrations of EGCG and ascorbic acid."( Preclinical evaluation of the antitumor activity of bortezomib in combination with vitamin C or with epigallocatechin gallate, a component of green tea.
Bannerman, B; Berger, A; Bolen, J; Claiborne, C; Dick, L; Fleming, P; Hales, P; Jones, M; Kupperman, E; Manfredi, M; Monbaliu, J; Tsu, C; Xu, L; Yu, J, 2011
)
0.93
" However, when combined with EGCG such that the plasma concentrations of EGCG were >200 μM at the time of bortezomib dosing, all antitumor activity was abrogated (TGI = -17."( Preclinical evaluation of the antitumor activity of bortezomib in combination with vitamin C or with epigallocatechin gallate, a component of green tea.
Bannerman, B; Berger, A; Bolen, J; Claiborne, C; Dick, L; Fleming, P; Hales, P; Jones, M; Kupperman, E; Manfredi, M; Monbaliu, J; Tsu, C; Xu, L; Yu, J, 2011
)
0.83
" Our findings provide new insights for the treatment of high-risk MDS, using either Bortezomib alone, or in combination with conventional antineoplastic agents."( Antitumor activity and drug interactions of proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib in human high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome cells.
Ding, T; Huang, J; Jin, J; Liu, H; Sun, X; Yang, M, 2011
)
0.83
"The activity and safety of bortezomib in combination with rituximab and dexamethasone were investigated in patients with relapsed or chemotherapy-refractory mantle cell lymphoma."( Bortezomib combined with rituximab and dexamethasone is an active regimen for patients with relapsed and chemotherapy-refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Chott, A; Drach, J; Hoffmann, M; Kaufmann, H; Lamm, W; Raderer, M; Zielinski, C, 2011
)
2.11
"Bortezomib combined with rituximab and dexamethasone has promising activity and manageable toxicity in patients with heavily pretreated mantle cell lymphoma."( Bortezomib combined with rituximab and dexamethasone is an active regimen for patients with relapsed and chemotherapy-refractory mantle cell lymphoma.
Chott, A; Drach, J; Hoffmann, M; Kaufmann, H; Lamm, W; Raderer, M; Zielinski, C, 2011
)
3.25
"This study was aimed to investigate the apoptosis induced by bortezomib combined with As(2)O(3) in APL cell line NB4 and its mechanism."( [NB4 cell apoptosis induced by bortezomib combined with As(2)O(3) and its mechanism].
Chen, XW; Xia, HL; Xia, RX, 2011
)
0.9
"This study was aimed to investigate the effect of curcumin in combination with bortezomib on the proliferation and apoptosis of human MM cell line H929 in vitro, and to explore its mechanisms."( [Effect of curcumin in combination with bortezomib on proliferation and apoptosis of human multiple myeloma cell line H929 and its mechanism].
Bai, QX; Chen, JJ; Huang, GS; Yang, LJ; Zhang, XY; Zhao, H, 2011
)
0.86
"This study was aimed to investigate the effect of bortezomib alone or combined with arsenic trioxide on the apoptosis of Jurkat cells and expression of livin mRNA."( [Effects of bortezomib alone or combined with arsenic trioxide on the apoptosis of Jurkat cells and expression of livin mRNA].
Sun, ZQ; Tan, DW, 2011
)
1
"The aim of this study was to explore the clinical effect and toxicity of bortezomib combined with methylprednisolone in treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."( [Effects of bortezomib combined with methylprednisolone in treatment of 33 cases of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma].
An, N; Chen, SL; Hu, Y; Li, X; Zhang, JJ; Zhong, YP, 2011
)
0.98
" Increased platinum accumulation may result in increased platinum-DNA binding so that CS in combination with Bort may produce pronounced cell kill."( Modulation of cisplatin cytotoxicity due to its combination with bortezomib and the nature of its administration.
Al-Eisawi, Z; Beale, P; Chan, C; Huq, F; Yu, JQ, 2011
)
0.61
" Mechanistically, SAHA combined with bortezomib enhanced protein ubiquitination synergistically and enhanced histone acetylation by inhibiting the expression of HDACs."( Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) combined with bortezomib inhibits renal cancer growth by enhancing histone acetylation and protein ubiquitination synergistically.
Asano, T; Ito, K; Sato, A; Sumitomo, M, 2012
)
0.9
"SAHA combined with bortezomib inhibits the proliferation of renal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, and the effectiveness of the combination is due to its synergistic enhancement of histone acetylation and protein ubiquitination."( Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) combined with bortezomib inhibits renal cancer growth by enhancing histone acetylation and protein ubiquitination synergistically.
Asano, T; Ito, K; Sato, A; Sumitomo, M, 2012
)
0.96
"This study was aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of bortezomib combined with autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoPBSCT) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM)."( [Bortezomib combined with autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for therapy of patients with multiple myeloma].
Bai, H; Ling, YQ; Wang, CB; Wang, ML; Wu, B; Zhang, Q, 2011
)
1.52
" We therefore conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of vorinostat in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with recurrent GBM."( Phase II trial of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in recurrent glioblastoma: a north central cancer treatment group study.
Anderson, SK; Buckner, J; Friday, BB; Galanis, E; Geoffroy, F; Giannini, C; Gross, H; Jaeckle, K; Mazurczak, M; Pajon, E; Schwerkoske, J; Yu, C, 2012
)
0.84
" In the present study, we investigated the preclinical activity of ACY-1215, an HDAC6-selective inhibitor, alone and in combination with bortezomib in MM."( Preclinical activity, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties of a selective HDAC6 inhibitor, ACY-1215, in combination with bortezomib in multiple myeloma.
Anderson, KC; Bradner, J; Canavese, M; Cirstea, D; Eda, H; Hideshima, T; Jarpe, M; Jones, SS; Kung, AL; Mazitschek, R; Ogier, WC; Raje, N; Rodig, S; Santo, L; Scullen, T; Tamang, D; Tseng, JC; van Duzer, JH; Yang, M, 2012
)
0.79
"To evaluate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of elotuzumab in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."( Phase I trial of anti-CS1 monoclonal antibody elotuzumab in combination with bortezomib in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Afar, DE; Anderson, KC; Bensinger, W; Benson, DM; Jakubowiak, AJ; Mohrbacher, A; Richardson, PG; Siegel, DS; Singhal, AK; Zimmerman, TM, 2012
)
0.82
"To investigate reversal effect of histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 alone or in combination with proteasome inhibitor bortezomib on drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and its mechanism."( [Reversal effect of LBH589 alone or in combination with bortezomib on drug-resistance in myeloid leukemia and its mechanism].
Chen, WW; Huang, KK; Huang, M; Jiang, XJ; Meng, FY; Wang, Q; Wang, ZX; Wu, FQ; Zhou, HS, 2011
)
0.82
" These data suggest that this drug combination may be useful as a therapy for solid tumors."( Combination with bortezomib enhances the antitumor effects of nanoparticle-encapsulated thiostrepton.
Gartel, AL; Wang, M, 2012
)
0.72
"This study aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly bortezomib in combination with fixed standard doses of carboplatin and bevacizumab, and to estimate the efficacy (response rate and progression free survival [PFS]) and safety of combination therapy with carboplatin, bortezomib, and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)."( Phase-I/II study of bortezomib in combination with carboplatin and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Bathini, V; Bradley, K; Hanrahan-Boshes, M; Hutchinson, L; Perez-Soler, R; Piperdi, B; Walsh, WV; Zhou, Z, 2012
)
0.93
"8 mg/m weekly on day 1 and day 8 in combination with carboplatin AUC 6 and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on every 21-day cycle."( Phase-I/II study of bortezomib in combination with carboplatin and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Bathini, V; Bradley, K; Hanrahan-Boshes, M; Hutchinson, L; Perez-Soler, R; Piperdi, B; Walsh, WV; Zhou, Z, 2012
)
0.7
"Bortezomib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) both alone and in combination with other agents; however, limited data exist regarding its toxicity in combination with common frontline therapies for indolent NHL."( A phase 1 dose escalation study of bortezomib combined with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, modified vincristine, and prednisone for untreated follicular lymphoma and other low-grade B-cell lymphomas.
Bumpers, K; Flowers, CR; Heffner, LT; Hutchison-Rzepka, A; Kaufman, JL; Khoury, HJ; King, N; Lechowicz, MJ; Lewis, C; Lonial, S; Shenoy, PJ; Sinha, R; Tighiouart, M, 2012
)
2.1
"Bortezomib combined with modified R-CHOP produced high response rates without substantial increases in toxicity."( A phase 1 dose escalation study of bortezomib combined with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, modified vincristine, and prednisone for untreated follicular lymphoma and other low-grade B-cell lymphomas.
Bumpers, K; Flowers, CR; Heffner, LT; Hutchison-Rzepka, A; Kaufman, JL; Khoury, HJ; King, N; Lechowicz, MJ; Lewis, C; Lonial, S; Shenoy, PJ; Sinha, R; Tighiouart, M, 2012
)
2.1
"We performed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of bortezomib in combination with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) as first-line treatment for patients with stage III/IV peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) based on our phase I study results."( Bortezomib in combination with CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with stage III/IV peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial.
Do, IG; Huh, J; Kang, HJ; Kim, HJ; Kim, HK; Kim, JS; Kim, SJ; Kim, WS; Ko, YH; Lee, J; Lee, SS; Min, SK; Park, SK; Ryoo, BY; Suh, C; Yang, WI; Yoon, DH, 2012
)
2.07
"To study the influence of Secoisolariciresinol Diglucoside (SDG) combined with Bortezomib on induction of apoptosis in lung cancer cell line A549 and its relative mechanisms."( [Effects of secoisolariciresinol diglucoside combined with bortezomib on induction of apoptosis in lung cancer cell line A549].
Li, XW; Yang, JR, 2012
)
0.85
"The results demonstrate that SDG combined with Bortezomib can significantly induce apoptosis of A549 cells, its mechanisms may be involved in activation of the JNK pathway."( [Effects of secoisolariciresinol diglucoside combined with bortezomib on induction of apoptosis in lung cancer cell line A549].
Li, XW; Yang, JR, 2012
)
0.88
" This phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly bortezomib induction combined with Y-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan followed at the time of count recovery by weekly bortezomib consolidation in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular or transformed non-Hodgkin lymphoma."( Bortezomib may be safely combined with Y-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase I trial of combined induction therapy and bortezomib consolidation.
Cilley, J; Evens, AM; Gallot, L; Gordon, LI; Larson, A; Patton, D; Rademaker, A; Roy, R; Spies, S; Variakojis, D; Winter, JN, 2013
)
2.05
" We analyzed the proapoptotic effects of both TRAIL versions in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (BZB) in hepatoma cells and primary human hepatocytes as well as in intact explants from HCC and healthy liver tissue."( Increased apoptosis induction in hepatocellular carcinoma by a novel tumor-targeted TRAIL fusion protein combined with bortezomib.
Bantel, H; Kontermann, R; Krech, T; Länger, F; Lehner, F; Manns, MP; Nüssler, A; Pfizenmaier, K; Schulze-Osthoff, K; Siegemund, M; Vondran, F; Wahl, K, 2013
)
0.81
" We examined this drug combination in advanced relapsing and/or refractory MM patients (n = 34)."( Phase I trial of vorinostat combined with bortezomib for the treatment of relapsing and/or refractory multiple myeloma.
Graef, T; Hardwick, JS; Hussein, M; Jagannath, S; Lupinacci, L; Schiller, GJ; Sobecks, RM; Weber, DM, 2012
)
0.64
" Vorinostat combined with bortezomib has demonstrated synergistic antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity in preclinical models of MM."( Phase I trial of vorinostat combined with bortezomib for the treatment of relapsing and/or refractory multiple myeloma.
Graef, T; Hardwick, JS; Hussein, M; Jagannath, S; Lupinacci, L; Schiller, GJ; Sobecks, RM; Weber, DM, 2012
)
0.94
"Abstract This phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor 17-allyamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) in combination with bortezomib, and to provide pharmacokinetic data in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( Pharmacokinetics and dose escalation of the heat shock protein inhibitor 17-allyamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in combination with bortezomib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Binkley, P; Blum, KA; Blum, W; Byrd, JC; Garzon, R; Geyer, S; Grever, MR; Jiang, Y; Johnston, JS; Kefauver, C; Klisovic, R; Marcucci, G; Phelps, MA; Walker, AR, 2013
)
0.78
"This study was aimed to further explore the apoptosis-inducing effect of bortezomib combined with cytarabine (Ara-C) on U937 cell line."( [Mechanism of apoptosis synergistically induced by bortezomib combined with cytarabine in U937 cell line].
DU, SH; DU, X; He, C; Jia, PM; Tong, JH; Zhou, L, 2012
)
0.86
"This study was aimed to investigate the effect of arsenic trioxide (As(2)O(3)) alone and in combination with bortezomib (Bor) on proliferation and apoptosis of leukemia cell line K562, and to analyze the potential mechanism."( [Effects of arsenic trioxide combined with bortezomib on proliferation and apoptosis of K562 cells and their mechanism].
Hao, LM; Huang, JQ; Li, XM; Wang, SM; Wei, LY; Wu, HY, 2012
)
0.85
"To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of tanespimycin when given in combination with bortezomib."( Phase I study of tanespimycin in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
Ames, MM; Erlichman, C; Hendrickson, AE; Menefee, M; Northfelt, D; Qin, R; Satele, D; Schenk, E; Toft, DO, 2013
)
0.84
" A number of studies have been conducted to evaluate the activity and safety of bortezomib either alone or in combination with several cytotoxic agents and radiation."( Effect of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and 5‑fluorouracil on 4T1 breast cancer cells.
Altıkat, S; Boyaci, I; Cavga, FZ; Irmak, R; Kocacan, SA; Yerlikaya, A, 2013
)
1.02
"The protease inhibitor bortezomib attenuates the action of NF-κB and has shown preclinical activity alone and in combination with chemotherapy."( A phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with epirubicin, carboplatin and capecitabine (ECarboX) in advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
Eatock, MM; Gallagher, R; James, CR; Law, D; Millar, J; Morris, M; Napier, E; Purcell, C; Turkington, RC; Wilson, RH, 2014
)
1.04
"6 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 from cycle 2 onwards) in combination with Epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) intravenously on day 1, Carboplatin AUC 5 day 1 and Capecitabine 625 mg m(-2) BD days 1-21 every 21 days (VECarboX regimen), in patients with advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma."( A phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with epirubicin, carboplatin and capecitabine (ECarboX) in advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
Eatock, MM; Gallagher, R; James, CR; Law, D; Millar, J; Morris, M; Napier, E; Purcell, C; Turkington, RC; Wilson, RH, 2014
)
0.73
"Thalidomide, the first clinically available immunomodulatory drug, reaches monotherapy treatment response in about 1/ 3 of significantly pretreated patients with multiple myeloma, and in combination with glucocorticoids approximately 50% response rate."( [Thalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma: focus on combination with bortezomib].
Gumulec, J; Hájek, R; Plonková, H, 2013
)
0.62
"We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximal tolerated dose of bortezomib that could be combined with standard dose lenalidomide in patients with MDS or AML."( Phase I dose escalation study of bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Amrein, PC; Attar, EC; Ballen, KK; Deangelo, DJ; Fathi, AT; Foster, J; Fraser, JW; McAfee, S; Neuberg, D; Steensma, DP; Stone, RM; Wadleigh, M, 2013
)
0.89
"To compare the efficacy and safety of standard or reduced doses of bortezomib combined with adriamycin and dexamethasone (PAD) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM)."( [Efficacy comparison between standard and reduced doses of bortezomib combined with adriamycin and dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma].
Bai, QX; Chen, XQ; Dong, BX; Gao, GX; Gu, HT; Liang, R; Shu, MM; Yang, L; Zhang, T; Zhang, YQ, 2013
)
0.87
" PANORAMA 2 is a phase 2 trial of panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone to treat patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory multiple myeloma (with ≥2 prior lines of therapy, including an immunomodulatory drug, and patients who had progressed on or within 60 days of the last bortezomib-based therapy)."( PANORAMA 2: panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory myeloma.
Alsina, M; Coutre, SE; Gasparetto, C; Khan, M; Lonial, S; Mukhopadhyay, S; Ondovik, MS; Paley, CS; Richardson, PG; Schlossman, RL; Weber, DM, 2013
)
0.89
"We aimed to assess efficacy and tolerability of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma."( Vorinostat or placebo in combination with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma (VANTAGE 088): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study.
Anderson, KC; Blacklock, H; Dimopoulos, M; Eid, JE; Facon, T; Goldschmidt, H; Graef, T; Hajek, R; Houp, J; Hungria, V; Lonial, S; Palumbo, A; Qi, J; Rosinol, L; Siegel, DS; Spencer, A; Sun, L; Vuocolo, S; Williams, C, 2013
)
0.88
" We randomly allocated patients (1:1) using an interactive voice response system to receive 21 day cycles of bortezomib (1·3 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) in combination with oral vorinostat (400 mg) or matching placebo once-daily on days 1-14."( Vorinostat or placebo in combination with bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma (VANTAGE 088): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study.
Anderson, KC; Blacklock, H; Dimopoulos, M; Eid, JE; Facon, T; Goldschmidt, H; Graef, T; Hajek, R; Houp, J; Hungria, V; Lonial, S; Palumbo, A; Qi, J; Rosinol, L; Siegel, DS; Spencer, A; Sun, L; Vuocolo, S; Williams, C, 2013
)
0.87
"A phase I study to assess the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors."( A phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies.
Alberti, D; Ames, MM; Attia, S; Bailey, HH; Eickhoff, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Hoang, T; Holen, KD; Jiang, Z; Kolesar, JM; Marnocha, R; McGovern, RM; Reid, JM; Schelman, WR; Traynor, AM; Wilding, G; Wright, JJ, 2013
)
0.84
" We previously examined a once-daily continuous dosing schedule of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib which was well tolerated in cycles 1 and 2; however, there was concern regarding the tolerability through multiple cycles."( A Phase I study of intermittently dosed vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Alberti, D; Ames, MM; Bailey, HH; Deming, DA; Eickhoff, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Kolesar, JM; Marnocha, R; McGovern, RM; Ninan, J; Reid, JM; Schelman, WR; Wilding, G; Wright, J, 2014
)
0.85
" We present a case of POEMS syndrome in a 33-year-old woman, who was successfully treated with BorDex (bortezomib and dexamethasone) combined with radiotherapy, and followed by ASCT."( Successful treatment of POEMS syndrome with bortezomib and dexamethasone, combined with radiotherapy, and followed by autologous stem cell transplantation.
Hagihara, M; Hattori, Y; Ishigatsubo, Y; Ishii, Y; Ishiyama, Y; Tomita, N; Yamamoto, E; Yamazaki, E, 2013
)
0.87
"This study was aimed to investigate the effect of bortezomib combined with bisphosphonates on serum levels of DKK-1 and RANKL in multiple myeloma patients, and to evaluate its role in the therapy of osteolytic lesion."( [Effect of bortezomib combined with bisphosphonates on bone metabolism index in multiple myeloma].
Chen, BY; Chen, WM; Liao, LS; Lin, Y; Qu, S; Wei, TN, 2013
)
1.03
" RPMI 8266 cells were treated with ATO alone and in combination with bortezomib for 24 hours, and cell viability was assessed by modified MTT."( Effects of arsenic trioxide alone and in combination with bortezomib in multiple myeloma RPMI 8266 cells.
Cui, JW; Elmahi, AY; Hao, SS; Li, D; Li, W; Niu, C; Wang, GJ, 2013
)
0.87
" We also investigated the effects of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, alone and in combination with PU-H71 in Ewing sarcoma."( Pre-clinical efficacy of PU-H71, a novel HSP90 inhibitor, alone and in combination with bortezomib in Ewing sarcoma.
Ambati, SR; Chiosis, G; Kosugi, K; Lopes, EC; Meyers, PA; Mony, U; Moore, MA; Moreira, AL; Shah, SK; Taldone, T; Zehir, A, 2014
)
0.9
"We conclude that bortezomib is not effective for the treatment of advanced adenocarcinoma of the GEJ or stomach, whether used alone or in combination with irinotecan, in an unselected patient population."( Phase II trial of bortezomib alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or stomach.
Besanceney-Webler, C; Chen, EX; Cheng, J; Christos, P; Dilts, KT; Holloway, S; Keresztes, R; Lane, ME; Lin, J; Matulich, D; Ocean, AJ; Papetti, M; Schnoll-Sussman, F; Shah, MA; Sparano, JA; Ward, M; Wright, JJ; Xiang, J; Yantiss, RK, 2014
)
1.08
"3 mg/m2/dose, 2 doses/week for 2 weeks) in combination with vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone, and L-asparaginase (L-ASP)."( [Efficacy of chemotherapy combined with bortezomib for two cases of relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Ashikaga, T; Keino, D; Kinoshita, A; Kondoh, K; Morimoto, M; Ohyama, R; Yamashita, A, 2014
)
0.67
"Several clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of bortezomib in combination with various anti-myeloma agents; however, no definitive information is available regarding drugs best suited for use in combination with bortezomib."( Suitable drug combination with bortezomib for multiple myeloma under stroma-free conditions and in contact with fibronectin or bone marrow stromal cells.
Furukawa, Y; Kikuchi, J; Koyama, D; Mukai, HY, 2014
)
0.93
" In the present protocol, bortezomib was combined with bendamustine and prednisone, in order to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed/untreated MM."( Bendamustine and prednisone in combination with bortezomib (BPV) in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed/untreated multiple myeloma.
Andrea, M; Becker, C; Behre, G; Bourgeois, M; Edelmann, T; Gutsche, K; Hammerschmidt, D; Hennig, E; Heyn, S; Hoffmann, FA; Holzvogt, B; Kaiser, T; Krahl, R; Kreibich, U; Lindner, T; Niederwieser, D; Plötze, M; Pönisch, W; Reifenrath, K; Remane, Y; Schliwa, T; Schwarz, M; Schwarzer, A; Vucinic, V; Winkelmann, C; Zehrfeld, T, 2014
)
0.96
"This Phase 2 study tested the tolerability and efficacy of bortezomib combined with reinduction chemotherapy for pediatric patients with relapsed, refractory or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML)."( A Phase 2 study of bortezomib combined with either idarubicin/cytarabine or cytarabine/etoposide in children with relapsed, refractory or secondary acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.
Adlard, K; Alonzo, TA; Ballard, J; Gamis, AS; Gerbing, RB; Horton, TM; Howard, DS; Jenkins, G; Kelder, A; Moscow, JA; Perentesis, JP; Schuurhuis, GJ; Smith, FO, 2014
)
0.97
"Patients with <400 mg/m(2) prior anthracycline received bortezomib combined with idarubicin (12 mg/m(2) days 1-3) and low-dose cytarabine (100 mg/m(2) days 1-7) (Arm A)."( A Phase 2 study of bortezomib combined with either idarubicin/cytarabine or cytarabine/etoposide in children with relapsed, refractory or secondary acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.
Adlard, K; Alonzo, TA; Ballard, J; Gamis, AS; Gerbing, RB; Horton, TM; Howard, DS; Jenkins, G; Kelder, A; Moscow, JA; Perentesis, JP; Schuurhuis, GJ; Smith, FO, 2014
)
0.98
" In conclusion, our results suggest that sTRAIL-SL might be an efficient vehicle for sTRAIL delivery and that its use in clinic, in combination with BTZ, might represent an adjuvant strategy for the treatment of stage IV, sTRAIL-resistant, NB patients."( sTRAIL coupled to liposomes improves its pharmacokinetic profile and overcomes neuroblastoma tumour resistance in combination with Bortezomib.
Becherini, P; Brignole, C; Cilli, M; Cossu, I; Destefanis, E; Di Paolo, D; Emionite, L; Giacomini, A; Loi, M; Pastorino, F; Perri, P; Piaggio, F; Ponzoni, M, 2014
)
0.61
"This study was aimed to investigate the effects of bortezomib combined with 5-azacytidine on the apoptosis of K562 cells and expressiom of SHIP mRNA."( [Effects of bortezomib combined with 5-azacytidine on the apoptosis of K562 cells and expression of SHIP mRNA].
Jia, ZQ; Rong, HQ; Su, W; Tao, J; Wei, YL; Wei, YT; Yu, CX, 2014
)
1.03
" Bendamustine was administered with a cumulative dose of up to 200 mg/m(2)."( Bendamustine in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone is a viable salvage option in myeloma relapsed and/or refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide.
Aitchison, R; Blesing, N; Lau, IJ; Peniket, A; Rabin, N; Ramasamy, K; Roberts, P; Smith, D; Yong, K, 2015
)
0.62
"We hypothesized that bortezomib, an agent that suppresses HIF-1α transcriptional activity, when combined with bevacizumab, would obviate the HIF-1α resistance pathway."( Targeting hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in combination with antiangiogenic therapy: a phase I trial of bortezomib plus bevacizumab.
Amin, HM; Angelo, LS; Falchook, GS; Hess, K; Hong, D; Howard, AN; Huang, M; Jackson, EF; Janku, F; Kurzrock, R; Lawhorn, KN; Naing, A; Ng, CS; Parkhurst, KL; Tannir, NM; Vishwamitra, D; Wheler, JJ, 2014
)
0.93
"On August 5, 2013, a marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union (EU) was issued for pomalidomide in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least two prior treatment regimens, including both lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy."( The European medicines agency review of pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone for the treatment of adult patients with multiple myeloma: summary of the scientific assessment of the committee for medicinal products for human use.
Camarero, J; Flores, B; Gisselbrecht, C; Hanaizi, Z; Hemmings, R; Laane, E; Pignatti, F; Salmonson, T; Sancho-Lopez, A, 2015
)
0.59
" We prospectively evaluated 21 newly diagnosed MM patients with severe renal impairment secondary to tubular-interstitial damage, most of them due to myeloma kidney, who were primarily treated with bortezomib-based therapy combined with high cut-off hemodialysis (HCOD)."( Bortezomib-based therapy combined with high cut-off hemodialysis is highly effective in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with severe renal impairment.
Borsi, E; Brioli, A; Cavo, M; De Sanctis, LB; Mancini, E; Mancuso, K; Marzocchi, G; Pantani, L; Pezzi, A; Rizzo, R; Rocchi, S; Santoro, A; Santostefano, M; Tacchetti, P; Terragna, C; Zamagni, E; Zannetti, BA, 2015
)
2.05
"The purpose of this study was to determine the potential benefits of combination therapy using dimercaptosuccinic acid modified iron oxide (DMSA-Fe3O4) magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) combined with nontoxic concentration of bortezomib (BTZ) and gambogic acid (GA) on multiple myeloma (MM) RPMI-8226 cells and possible underlying mechanisms."( Inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by dimercaptosuccinic acid modified Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles combined with nontoxic concentration of bortezomib and gambogic acid in RPMI-8226 cells.
Chen, B; Qiao, L; Senthilkumar, R; Wang, F; Wang, X; Zhang, W, 2015
)
0.8
" We here compare bortezomib with carfilzomib and LU-102 in MM and MCL in vitro with regard to their effects on pIκB/NF-κB signaling and their cytotoxic activity in combination with ibrutinib."( The novel β2-selective proteasome inhibitor LU-102 decreases phosphorylation of I kappa B and induces highly synergistic cytotoxicity in combination with ibrutinib in multiple myeloma cells.
Bader, J; Besse, L; de Bruin, G; Driessen, C; Geurink, PP; Kisselev, AF; Kraus, J; Kraus, M; Liu, N; Overkleeft, H, 2015
)
0.76
"Treatment with dose-adjusted Len combined with low-dose Dex is an effective and safe therapy for older RRMM patients exhibiting renal impairment after receiving Bor-based therapies."( Dose-adjusted Lenalidomide Combined with Low-dose Dexamethasone Rescues Older Patients with Bortezomib-resistant Multiple Myeloma.
Kadowaki, M; Kohno, K; Okamura, S; Takase, K; Yamasaki, S, 2015
)
0.64
"To investigate the effect of CAL-101, a selective inhibitor of PI3Kδ, in combination with bortezomib on the proliferation and apoptosis in human mantle cell lymphoma cell lines Z138, HBL-2 and Jeko-1 in vitro, to explore its mechanisms and provide the foundation for effective treatment strategies against mantle cell lymphoma."( [Effects of the phosphoinostitide-3'-kinase delta inhibitor, CAL-101, in combination with Bortezomib on mantle lymophma cells and exploration of its related mechanism].
Guo, S; Li, X; Qu, F; Tian, C; Xia, B; Yu, Y; Zhang, L; Zhang, Y, 2015
)
0.86
"Panobinostat, a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma when combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in a phase 3 trial, PANORAMA-1."( Panobinostat PK/PD profile in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Binlich, F; Corrado, C; Hino, M; Kuroda, Y; Lin, R; Mu, S; Shibayama, H; Suzuki, K; Tajima, T; Waldron, E, 2016
)
0.89
"Apparent panobinostat exposure-AE and exposure-ORR relationships were observed when combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma."( Panobinostat PK/PD profile in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Binlich, F; Corrado, C; Hino, M; Kuroda, Y; Lin, R; Mu, S; Shibayama, H; Suzuki, K; Tajima, T; Waldron, E, 2016
)
0.91
"3 (dose level 2) mg/m(2) in combination with melphalan 8 mg/m(2) on days 1-4 and dexamethasone 20 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12."( Phase 1 study of bortezomib in combination with melphalan and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis.
Abe, M; Ando, Y; Fuchida, S; Hata, H; Imai, H; Ishida, T; Miyamoto, T; Sawamura, M; Shimazaki, C; Suzuki, K; Takamatsu, H; Yamada, M, 2016
)
0.77
" We determined dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose for phase II of nelfinavir in combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib."( Treatment with the HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir triggers the unfolded protein response and may overcome proteasome inhibitor resistance of multiple myeloma in combination with bortezomib: a phase I trial (SAKK 65/08).
Bader, J; Berset, C; Berthod, G; Driessen, C; Hawle, H; Hess, D; Hitz, F; Huitema, A; Joerger, M; Kraus, M; Mey, UJ; Overkleeft, HS; Pabst, T; Rosing, H; Sessa, C; von Moos, R; Xyrafas, A, 2016
)
0.83
" Findings of many preclinical studies have shown synergistic antilymphoma activity when panobinostat is combined with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib."( Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: an open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial.
Chan, YH; Fadilah, S; Goh, YT; Hwang, WY; Kim, WS; Kumar, SG; Lee, YS; Lim, ST; Ng, SC; Phipps, C; Tan, D; Tan, SY; Tay, K; Yeap, CH, 2015
)
0.9
"Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) in combination with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) have been shown to be effective against relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."( Phase I study of once weekly treatment with bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Hagiwara, S; Iida, S; Ishida, T; Ito, A; Kanamori, T; Kato, C; Kinoshita, S; Komatsu, H; Kusumoto, S; Masuda, A; Murakami, S; Nakashima, T; Narita, T; Ri, M; Suzuki, N; Totani, H; Yoshida, T, 2016
)
0.7
"To investigate the clinical efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy using dendritic cells (DC) and cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells combined with chemotherapy in multiple myeloma."( Immunomodulatory effect of DC/CIK combined with chemotherapy in multiple myeloma and the clinical efficacy.
Ding, HF; Ji, CY; Liu, GQ; Ma, DX; Xing, J; Xu, M; Zhao, X, 2015
)
0.42
"To explore the efficacy and prognostic factors of induction therapy combined with autogenetic peripheral blood stem cells transplantation (APBSCT)in patients with multiple myeloma (MM)."( [Efficacy and prognostic factors of induction therapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation in 201 patients with multiple myeloma].
Chang, H; Du, J; Fan, J; Fu, W; He, H; Hou, J; Jiang, H; Jin, L; Xi, H; Zeng, T; Zhang, C; Zhou, L, 2016
)
0.43
" Preclinical and phase I clinical data suggest activity of bortezomib in NSCLC, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents including gemcitabine and cisplatin."( A phase II, open-label trial of bortezomib (VELCADE(®)) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Agelaki, S; Filippa, G; Georgoulias, V; Kentepozidis, N; Kontopodis, E; Kotsakis, A; Mala, A; Mavroudis, D; Moutsos, M; Syrigos, K; Vamvakas, L; Ziras, N, 2016
)
0.96
" on days 1 and 8, and starting on day 21 (cycle 2), bortezomib (days 1 and 8) in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), (days 1 and 8), and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) (day 1) in cycles of 21 days."( A phase II, open-label trial of bortezomib (VELCADE(®)) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Agelaki, S; Filippa, G; Georgoulias, V; Kentepozidis, N; Kontopodis, E; Kotsakis, A; Mala, A; Mavroudis, D; Moutsos, M; Syrigos, K; Vamvakas, L; Ziras, N, 2016
)
0.97
"The present global, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase IIb study was designed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of oral vorinostat combined with standard doses of bortezomib in patients with multiple myeloma considered refractory to novel myeloma agents."( VANTAGE 095: An International, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Vorinostat (MK-0683) in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Anderson, KC; Dimopoulos, M; Durrant, S; Eid, JE; Gause, C; Goldschmidt, H; Graef, T; Houp, J; Jagannath, S; Kaufman, JL; Leleu, X; Nagler, A; Offner, F; Siegel, DS; Vuocolo, S, 2016
)
0.84
" This phase 1 study investigated the safety and efficacy of pralatrexate in combination with bortezomib in adults with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma."( A phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study of pralatrexate in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Berube, C; Coutré, SE; Dinner, S; Dunn, TJ; Gotlib, J; Hao, Y; Liedtke, M; Medeiros, BC; Price, E, 2016
)
0.88
"Various cytotoxic agents were evaluated in combination with (131) I-MIP-1095 for their capacity to delay the growth of LNCaP cells cultured as multicellular tumour spheroids."( Preliminary evaluation of prostate-targeted radiotherapy using (131) I-MIP-1095 in combination with radiosensitising chemotherapeutic drugs.
Babich, JW; Mairs, RJ; Nixon, C; Rae, C; Tesson, M, 2016
)
0.43
"To evaluate the clinical characteristics of multiple myeloma (MM) combined with renal amyloidosis and its curative efficacy and prognosis."( [Clinical Characteristics and Therapeutic Efficacy of Multiple Myeloma Combined with Renal Amyloidosis].
Chen, SQ; Chen, YD; Gan, SL; Jiang, ZX; Liu, LX; Liu, YF; Ma, J; Meng, XL; Sun, H; Sun, L; Wan, DM; Wang, F; Wen, HY; Xie, XS, 2016
)
0.43
"The clinical data of 22 cases of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma combined with renal amyloidosis treated in our hospital from November 2011 to July 2015 were analyzed retrospectively."( [Clinical Characteristics and Therapeutic Efficacy of Multiple Myeloma Combined with Renal Amyloidosis].
Chen, SQ; Chen, YD; Gan, SL; Jiang, ZX; Liu, LX; Liu, YF; Ma, J; Meng, XL; Sun, H; Sun, L; Wan, DM; Wang, F; Wen, HY; Xie, XS, 2016
)
0.43
" A recent study disclosed that pralatrexate has a synergistic effect in combination with bortezomib."( Pralatrexate in Combination with Bortezomib for Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma in 5 Elderly Patients.
Ahn, JS; Cho, MS; Jung, SH; Jung, SY; Kim, HJ; Kim, YK; Lee, JJ; Lee, SS; Yang, DH, 2016
)
0.94
" Bortezomib is the first product to be approved for the treatment of patients with previously untreated MCL, for whom haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is unsuitable, and is used in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP)."( Cost-effectiveness analysis of bortezomib in combination with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (VR-CAP) in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma.
Gairy, K; Lee, D; Seshagiri, D; Thilakarathne, P; van Keep, M, 2016
)
1.63
" The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib combined with glucocorticoids in refractory lupus patients."( The short-term efficacy of bortezomib combined with glucocorticoids for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis.
Hou, J; Hu, W; Huang, L; Huang, X; Liu, Z; Zhang, H; Zhou, M, 2017
)
0.99
"To study the clinical efficacy of cellular immunotherapy combined with bortezomib for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma."( [Clinical Efficacy of Cellular Immuotherapy Combined with Bortezomib for the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma].
Long, H; Shao, JH; Wang, YM; Yang, D, 2017
)
0.93
"A total of 76 patients with multiple myeloma in our hospital from October 2012 to October 2013 were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups: the patients in 1 group (38 cases) were treated with cellular immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy including bortezomib (combined therapy group), the patients in other group(38 cases) were treated with only chemotherapy including bortezomib(single chemotherapy as control group)."( [Clinical Efficacy of Cellular Immuotherapy Combined with Bortezomib for the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma].
Long, H; Shao, JH; Wang, YM; Yang, D, 2017
)
0.88
"Cellular immunotherapy combined with bortezomib can significantly improve the remission rate, prolong survival, and significantly decrease adverse event rate of multiple myeloma patients."( [Clinical Efficacy of Cellular Immuotherapy Combined with Bortezomib for the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma].
Long, H; Shao, JH; Wang, YM; Yang, D, 2017
)
0.97
" This study determined the safety, preliminary clinical activity, and pharmacokinetics of KW-2478, an Hsp90 inhibitor, in combination with BTZ in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."( A phase I/II study of KW-2478, an Hsp90 inhibitor, in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Akinaga, S; Baetiong-Caguioa, P; Cavenagh, J; Davies, F; Gharibo, M; Kurman, M; Nakashima, D; Novak, B; Oakervee, H; Rabin, N; Shiraishi, N; Yong, K, 2017
)
0.69
" The antimyeloma activity of KW-2478 in combination with BTZ as scheduled in this trial appeared relatively modest; however, the good tolerability of the combination would support further exploration of alternate dosing schedules and combinations."( A phase I/II study of KW-2478, an Hsp90 inhibitor, in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Akinaga, S; Baetiong-Caguioa, P; Cavenagh, J; Davies, F; Gharibo, M; Kurman, M; Nakashima, D; Novak, B; Oakervee, H; Rabin, N; Shiraishi, N; Yong, K, 2017
)
0.69
" They are administered individually or in combination with other regimens, to prevent severe side effects and resistance development."( Bortezomib Alone and in Combination With Salinosporamid A Induces Apoptosis and Promotes Pheochromocytoma Cell Death In Vitro and in Female Nude Mice.
Bullova, P; Cougnoux, A; Kopacek, J; Marzouca, G; Pacak, K, 2017
)
1.9
"Daratumumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd) has demonstrated longer progression-free survival than combination of bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."( Safety and efficacy of daratumumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Aoki, M; Ichinohe, T; Iida, S; Shinagawa, A; Suzuki, K; Takezako, N, 2018
)
1.01
" Case reports and small reviews have evaluated the addition of agents directed against plasma cell disorders in combination with traditional lymphoma-directed regimens."( Bortezomib in combination with dose-adjusted EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) induces long-term survival in patients with plasmablastic lymphoma: a retrospective analysis.
Dittus, C; Ellsworth, S; Grover, N; Park, SI; Tan, X, 2018
)
1.92
"To investigate the effects of bortezomib alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on proliferation and apoptosis in the human choriocarcinoma cell line JEG-3."( The effects of bortezomib alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil on proliferation and apoptosis of choriocarcinoma cells.
Li, CD; Liu, HP; Liu, L; Liu, QR; Tong, Y; Wang, HF,
)
0.77
"Bortezomib alone or in combination with 5-FU inhibited JEG-3 cell proliferation and induced apoptosis by increasing NF-kB expression."( The effects of bortezomib alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil on proliferation and apoptosis of choriocarcinoma cells.
Li, CD; Liu, HP; Liu, L; Liu, QR; Tong, Y; Wang, HF,
)
1.93
"To study the clinical efficacy and safety of dexamethasone of different doses combined with bortezomib and thalidomide for treatment of primary multiple myeloma."( [Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Dexamethasone Combined with Bortezomib and Thalidomide for Treating Patients with Multiple Myeloma].
Fu, LP; Ji, Y; Li, CS; Zhang, WP, 2018
)
0.93
"The therapeutic efficacy of different doses of dexamethasone combined with bortezomib and thalidomide for patients with multiple myeloma is similar, can obviously enhance remission rate, prolong the survival time, promote life quality, but the incidence of adverse reactions in low dose dexamethason rigemen is significantly reduced, and the safety is better."( [Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Dexamethasone Combined with Bortezomib and Thalidomide for Treating Patients with Multiple Myeloma].
Fu, LP; Ji, Y; Li, CS; Zhang, WP, 2018
)
0.94
"To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone compared to bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with bortezomib, from the perspective of the Chilean National Health Service."( Cost-effectiveness of lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone compared to bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone for the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma in Chile.
Aceituno, S; Appierto, M; Gozalbo, I; Lizán, L, 2018
)
0.92
"Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone represents a potentially cost-effective alternative for the second-line treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who are not eligible for transplantation, from the perspective of the Chilean National Health Service."( Cost-effectiveness of lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone compared to bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone for the second-line treatment of multiple myeloma in Chile.
Aceituno, S; Appierto, M; Gozalbo, I; Lizán, L, 2018
)
0.71
" The treatment outcomes of MAbs versus HDACi in combination with bortezomib or lenalidomide plus dexamethasone remain unknown."( Monoclonal Antibodies versus Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Combination with Bortezomib or Lenalidomide plus Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Indirect-Comparison Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial
Chen, X; Feng, J; Gao, G; Shen, H; Tang, H; Xu, L; Zhang, N; Zheng, Y, 2018
)
0.95
" In a preclinical study TNBC cells were treated with the first-generation proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and synergistic efficacy was demonstrated."( Ixazomib in combination with carboplatin in pretreated women with advanced triple-negative breast cancer, a phase I/II trial of the AGMT (AGMT MBC-10 trial).
Balic, M; Bartsch, R; Burgstaller, S; Egle, D; Fuchs, D; Gampenrieder, SP; Greil, R; Melchardt, T; Mlineritsch, B; Petru, E; Petzer, A; Rinnerthaler, G; Rossmann, D; Rumpold, H; Singer, CF; Ulmer, H, 2018
)
0.7
" Patients will receive ixazomib in combination with carboplatin on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 28-day cycle."( Ixazomib in combination with carboplatin in pretreated women with advanced triple-negative breast cancer, a phase I/II trial of the AGMT (AGMT MBC-10 trial).
Balic, M; Bartsch, R; Burgstaller, S; Egle, D; Fuchs, D; Gampenrieder, SP; Greil, R; Melchardt, T; Mlineritsch, B; Petru, E; Petzer, A; Rinnerthaler, G; Rossmann, D; Rumpold, H; Singer, CF; Ulmer, H, 2018
)
0.48
" Bortezomib in combination with cyclosporine A and plasma exchange was introduced."( Relapsing Evans syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus with antiphospholipid syndrome treated with Bortezomib in combination with plasma exchange.
Gilburd, B; Lapin, S; Maslyansky, A; Mikhailova, L; Myachikova, V; Tkachenko, O, 2019
)
1.64
" To investigate the effects of these compounds on bortezomib's anti-proliferative potency and its intracellular accumulation and potency to inhibit the chymotrypsin-like proteasomal subunit, seven myeloma cell lines were investigated after exposure to bortezomib alone or either combined with adriamycin plus dexamethasone (PAD regimen) or melphalan plus prednisolone (VMP regimen), respectively."( Elucidating the beneficial effects of melphalan, adriamycin, and corticoids in combination with bortezomib against multiple myeloma in vitro.
Burhenne, J; Schäfer, J; Theile, D; Weiss, J, 2019
)
0.99
" In this study, we report the effects of single reagent DAC therapy and DAC combined with BZM on β-catenin accumulation, myeloma cell survival, apoptosis, and treatment sensitivity."( Synergistic Efficacy of the Demethylation Agent Decitabine in Combination With the Protease Inhibitor Bortezomib for Treating Multiple Myeloma Through the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway.
Chen, X; Dong, B; Feng, J; Gao, G; Gu, H; Jin, Y; Shu, M; Wu, X; Xu, L; Zhang, J, 2019
)
0.73
"This phase Ib/II study aimed to determine the safety and tolerability of ulocuplumab alone and in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Arm A), or bortezomib and dexamethasone (Arm B), in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma."( A Phase Ib/II Trial of the First-in-Class Anti-CXCR4 Antibody Ulocuplumab in Combination with Lenalidomide or Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.
Anderson, KC; Baz, R; Becker, PS; Chuma, S; Ghobrial, IM; Henrick, P; Hornburg, K; Laubach, J; Liu, CJ; Perez, RP; Redd, RA; Reyes, K; Richardson, PG; Robbins, MD; Sabbatini, P; Savell, A; Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, R; Zavidij, O, 2020
)
0.97
"This study showed that blockade of the CXCR4-CXCL12 axis by ulocuplumab is safe with acceptable AEs and leads to a high response rate in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma, making CXCR4 inhibitors a promising class of antimyeloma drugs that should be further explored in clinical trials."( A Phase Ib/II Trial of the First-in-Class Anti-CXCR4 Antibody Ulocuplumab in Combination with Lenalidomide or Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.
Anderson, KC; Baz, R; Becker, PS; Chuma, S; Ghobrial, IM; Henrick, P; Hornburg, K; Laubach, J; Liu, CJ; Perez, RP; Redd, RA; Reyes, K; Richardson, PG; Robbins, MD; Sabbatini, P; Savell, A; Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, R; Zavidij, O, 2020
)
0.77
"We evaluated ibrutinib, a once-daily inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who had received 1-3 prior therapies."( A phase 2 study of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Anagnostopoulos, A; Briso, EM; Cascavilla, N; Dobkowska, E; García Sanz, R; Hajek, R; Hauns, B; Lee, Y; Martin Sánchez, J; Oriol, A; Ozcan, M; Pour, L; Špička, I; Terjung, A, 2020
)
1.03
"Ibrutinib combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone elicited clinical responses."( A phase 2 study of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Anagnostopoulos, A; Briso, EM; Cascavilla, N; Dobkowska, E; García Sanz, R; Hajek, R; Hauns, B; Lee, Y; Martin Sánchez, J; Oriol, A; Ozcan, M; Pour, L; Špička, I; Terjung, A, 2020
)
1.12
" The patient underwent autologous transplantation and is still in remission, demonstrating the benefits of a bortezomib-based regimen in combination with PE for IgD MM with AKD."( Plasma exchange combined with bortezomib-based chemotherapy is effective for early renal recovery in a patient with IgD-λ type multiple myeloma.
Dobashi, N; Kato, J; Katsuma, A; Kawamura, T; Kimura, A; Kuno, H; Miyazaki, Y; Momoki, M; Nakashima, A; Ohba, R; Takahashi, D; Ueda, H; Yamamoto, I; Yokoo, T, 2020
)
1.06
" Together, our results indicate that DCZ0847, alone or in combination with bortezomib, may represent a potential new therapy for patients with MM."( A novel phosphoramide compound, DCZ0847, displays in vitro and in vivo anti-myeloma activity, alone or in combination with bortezomib.
Chen, G; Cheng, Y; Feng, Q; Gao, L; Hu, K; Hu, L; Li, B; Lu, K; Lu, Y; Shi, J; Song, D; Sun, H; Wang, Y; Wu, X; Xu, Z; Zhang, H; Zhou, J; Zhu, W, 2020
)
1
" Despite the extensive clinical use of bortezomib, the mechanism of the complex time-dependent pharmacokinetics of bortezomib has not been fully investigated in context of its pharmacodynamics (PD) and drug-drug interaction (DDI) profiles."( A Translational Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Framework of Target-Mediated Disposition, Target Inhibition and Drug-Drug Interactions of Bortezomib.
Hanley, M; Iwasaki, S; Venkatakrishnan, K; Xia, C; Zhu, A, 2020
)
1.02
" We report a case of acute renal failure caused by TAFRO syndrome, successfully managed by long-term corticosteroids combined with bortezomib and cyclophosphamide."( Acute Kidney Injury Caused by TAFRO Syndrome in a Chinese Patient: Efficacy of Long-Term Corticosteroids Combined with Bortezomib and Cyclophosphamide.
Chen, L; Li, J; Li, R; Li, X; Qin, Y; Shi, X; Wang, J; Xia, P; Zhang, L; Zhang, T; Zou, M, 2020
)
0.97
" A weekly dosing regimen of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone combined with medium dose prednisone in between were deployed."( Acute Kidney Injury Caused by TAFRO Syndrome in a Chinese Patient: Efficacy of Long-Term Corticosteroids Combined with Bortezomib and Cyclophosphamide.
Chen, L; Li, J; Li, R; Li, X; Qin, Y; Shi, X; Wang, J; Xia, P; Zhang, L; Zhang, T; Zou, M, 2020
)
1.06
" Randomized controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness and safety of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy for patients with mantle cell lymphoma will be included."( The effectiveness and harms of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Feng, C; Li, J; Li, W; Li, Y; Liu, X; Wang, X, 2020
)
1.07
"This study will provide a detailed summary of latest evidence related to the effectiveness and safety of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy in overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate, quality of life, and serious adverse events for patients with mantle cell lymphoma CONCLUSION:: The findings of this study may provide possible guidance for bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy for patients with mantle cell lymphoma."( The effectiveness and harms of bortezomib in combination with chemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Feng, C; Li, J; Li, W; Li, Y; Liu, X; Wang, X, 2020
)
1.06
"To investigate the effects of decitabine combined with bortezomib on the proliferation of mantle cell lymphoma cell lines (Jeko-1 and Grante519) in vitro and explore the underlying mechanisms."( [Effects of Decitabine Combined with Bortezomib on the Proliferation of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines and Its Underling Mechanisms].
Chen, D; Guo, XN; Li, Y; Qiao, SK; Xing, LN; Zhang, JN, 2020
)
1.08
" Compared with single-drug treatment group, DAC combined with BTZ significantly increased the inhibitory rate and apoptotic rate of Jeko-1 and Grante519 cells; PCDH8, Caspase 3 and BAX expression levels significantly increased, and the expression levels of NF-κB, BCL-2 and CCND1 significantly decreased in Jeko-1 and Grante519 cells."( [Effects of Decitabine Combined with Bortezomib on the Proliferation of Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines and Its Underling Mechanisms].
Chen, D; Guo, XN; Li, Y; Qiao, SK; Xing, LN; Zhang, JN, 2020
)
0.83
"To investigate the influence of influence of combination with 1q21 amplification or-no in patients with newly diagnosed MM on the clinical effecacy of bortezomib-based induction chemotherapy and long-term prognosis of patients."( [Influence of Combination with 1q21 Amplification or-No in Patients with Newly Diagnosed MM on the Clinical Effecacy of Bortezomib-based induction chemotherapy and Long-Term Prognosis of Patients].
Gu, WW; Mu, K; Ren, G; Wang, JS, 2020
)
0.97
" However, concomitant use of bortezomib in combination with either of DHA or EPA decreased the cell death induced by bortezomib, indicating that timing of coincubation is important for the effects on chemosensitivity."( The efficacy of bortezomib in human multiple myeloma cells is enhanced by combination with omega-3 fatty acids DHA and EPA: Timing is essential.
Chen, J; Garssen, J; Redegeld, F, 2021
)
1.26
"The present study provides novel evidence for the anticancer effects of DHA and EPA, and highlights their rational utilization in combination with bortezomib to achieve improved therapeutic outcome for MM."( The efficacy of bortezomib in human multiple myeloma cells is enhanced by combination with omega-3 fatty acids DHA and EPA: Timing is essential.
Chen, J; Garssen, J; Redegeld, F, 2021
)
1.17
"A 55-year-old MM patient with a family history of MM, who was also a chronic HBV carrier, achieved HBV clearance after treatment with a bortezomib-based regimen in combination with anti-HBV drugs."( Clearance of HBsAg in a patient with familial multiple myeloma after a bortezomib-based regimen combined with anti-HBV drug: A case report.
Li, X; Liang, Y; Tong, J; Wang, W; Xu, Y; Zhang, X, 2020
)
0.99
"This is the first case of MM with HBV clearance after receiving a bortezomib-based regimen combined with anti-HBV drug."( Clearance of HBsAg in a patient with familial multiple myeloma after a bortezomib-based regimen combined with anti-HBV drug: A case report.
Li, X; Liang, Y; Tong, J; Wang, W; Xu, Y; Zhang, X, 2020
)
1.03
"We report results of a phase-1 study evaluating the safety and anti-cancer activity of the small molecule insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) inhibitor, linsitinib combined with bortezomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma."( A phase-1 trial of linsitinib (OSI-906) in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Gul, E; Gyger, M; Jazubowiak, A; Kaufman, J; Khan, S; Lau, A; Le, LW; LeBlanc, R; Li, Z; Paul, H; Trudel, S; White, D, 2021
)
1.05
" We compared the activity of these proteasome inhibitors in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (KCd vs."( Carfilzomib or bortezomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone followed by carfilzomib maintenance for patients with multiple myeloma after one prior therapy: results from a multicenter, phase II, randomized, controlled trial (MUK
Auner, HW; Brown, SR; Bygrave, C; Cavenagh, J; Croft, J; Davies, F; De Tute, RM; Flanagan, L; Garg, M; Hawkins, S; Hinsley, S; Kaiser, MF; Morgan, G; Owen, RG; Rabin, NK; Ramasamy, K; Sherratt, D; Williams, C; Yong, KL, 2021
)
0.97
"To determine the safety of tipifarnib in combination with escalating doses of bortezomib and to determine the maximum tolerated dose in patients with untreated high-risk MDS and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia, who were not eligible for intensive therapy."( A phase I clinical trial to study the safety of treatment with tipifarnib combined with bortezomib in patients with advanced stages of myelodysplastic syndrome and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia.
Blijlevens, N; de Witte, T; Langemeijer, S; Muus, P; van Bijnen, S, 2021
)
1.07
"This study aimed to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cyclophosphamide when combined with bortezomib and fludarabine (B-FC) in a phase 1b trial, and to assess the efficacy and safety of this combination in a phase 2 trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL (rrMCL)."( Bortezomib in combination with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma: results of the LYM-4003 study.
Cai, QQ; Cao, JN; Feng, JF; Gao, Y; Huang, HQ; Jiang, WQ; Jin, J; Li, ZM; Wang, HQ; Wang, XX; Zhang, HL, 2021
)
2.28
"To investigate the effects of chidamide combined with anti-myeloma drugs on the proliferation and apoptosis of myeloma cells."( [The Effects of Chidamide Combined with Anti-myeloma Drugs on the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Myeloma Cells].
Chen, GH; Fu, CC; Liu, W; Liu, Y; Wu, DP; Xie, Y; Xu, Y; Yan, LZ; Yan, S; Yao, WQ, 2021
)
0.62
" In NCI-H929 cell line, chidamide combined with low-dose bortezomib and lenalidomide showed synergistic effect, while combined with dexamethasone and pomalidomide showed additive effect."( [The Effects of Chidamide Combined with Anti-myeloma Drugs on the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Myeloma Cells].
Chen, GH; Fu, CC; Liu, W; Liu, Y; Wu, DP; Xie, Y; Xu, Y; Yan, LZ; Yan, S; Yao, WQ, 2021
)
0.87
"Many clinical trials have assessed the effect and safety of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in combination with proteasome inhibitors or immunomodulators plus dexamethasone/prednisone for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM)."( Comparison of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38, SLAMF7 and PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with Bortezomib/Immunomodulators plus dexamethasone/prednisone for the treatment of multiple myeloma: an indirect-comparison Meta-analysis of randomised controlled tr
Deng, J; Gong, Y; Liu, X; Wu, X; Ye, W; Zheng, X, 2021
)
0.84
" In conclusion, MAbs targeting CD38 are the best, followed by those targeting SLAMF7; MAbs targeting PD-1/PD-L1 are the worst when in combination with bortezomib/immunomodulators plus dexamethasone/prednisone for the treatment of MM."( Comparison of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38, SLAMF7 and PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with Bortezomib/Immunomodulators plus dexamethasone/prednisone for the treatment of multiple myeloma: an indirect-comparison Meta-analysis of randomised controlled tr
Deng, J; Gong, Y; Liu, X; Wu, X; Ye, W; Zheng, X, 2021
)
1.04
" Therefore, we prospectively compared the efficacy of bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (CyBorD) and CyBorD combined with doxycycline for cardiac light chain amyloidosis."( Doxycycline Combined With Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Cardiac Light-Chain Amyloidosis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cao, XX; Chen, Y; Dong, YJ; Fu, WJ; Huang, ZX; Li, CR; Li, J; Miao, HL; Shen, KN; Sun, CY; Wei, YQ; Wu, Y; Zhang, YL; Zhou, DB, 2022
)
1.27
"Our trial demonstrated that doxycycline combined with CyBorD failed to prolong PFS or cardiac PFS compared with CyBorD alone in cardiac light chain amyloidosis."( Doxycycline Combined With Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Cardiac Light-Chain Amyloidosis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cao, XX; Chen, Y; Dong, YJ; Fu, WJ; Huang, ZX; Li, CR; Li, J; Miao, HL; Shen, KN; Sun, CY; Wei, YQ; Wu, Y; Zhang, YL; Zhou, DB, 2022
)
1.02
"2" to hypoxia stress by using bortezomib, and combined with transcriptome analysis, accurately captured the genes related to hypoxia tolerance advantage."( The transcriptomic responses of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) to acute hypoxia stress alone, and in combination with bortezomib.
Lu, LQ; Pan, RJ; Su, XL; Zhao, SS; Zheng, GD; Zou, SM, 2022
)
1.21
" Aggressive immunotherapy combined with bortezomib and rituximab was then initiated."( Aggressive immunotherapy combined with bortezomib and rituximab for membranous nephropathy associated with enzyme replacement therapy in Pompe disease.
Hanakawa, J; Inaba, A; Ito, S; Otani, M; Sasaki, K; Uchimura, T, 2023
)
1.45
" Here, we propose that rational drug combination design and validation in patient-derived HCC avatar models such as patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and organoids can improve proteasome inhibitor-based therapeutic efficacy and clinical potential."( Rational drug combination design in patient-derived avatars reveals effective inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma with proteasome and CDK inhibitors.
Bonney, GK; Chee, CE; Chow, EK; Chow, PK; Dan, YY; Hooi, L; Lim, JJ; Toh, TB; Zhou, L, 2022
)
0.72
"Rational drug combination design in patient-derived avatars highlights the therapeutic potential of proteasome and CDK inhibitors and represents a feasible approach towards developing more clinically relevant treatment strategies for HCC."( Rational drug combination design in patient-derived avatars reveals effective inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma with proteasome and CDK inhibitors.
Bonney, GK; Chee, CE; Chow, EK; Chow, PK; Dan, YY; Hooi, L; Lim, JJ; Toh, TB; Zhou, L, 2022
)
0.72
" We present a case of HIV-negative primary testicular PBL with long-term complete remission (CR) and successful treatment with bortezomib in combination with EPOCH (V-EPOCH)."( [Long-term complete remission of HIV-negative primary testicular plasmablastic lymphoma treated with bortezomib in combination with EPOCH].
Fujishima, T; Kawabata, Y; Kitabayashi, A; Michishita, Y; Takahashi, N, 2022
)
1.14
" Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the role of p53 knockdown or overexpression in multiple myeloma and the therapeutic effect of recombinant adenovirus-p53 (rAd-p53) in combination with Bortezomib."( Recombinant human p53 adenovirus injection combined with Bortezomib inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in multiple myeloma.
Chen, Y; Shen, L; Shi, Q; Wang, G; Wang, Q, 2023
)
1.34
" We report the first case of primary PCL successfully treated with upfront novel agents consisting of Venetoclax and daratumumab in combination with intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic transplantation."( Plasma Cell Leukemia with Successful Upfront Venetoclax in Combination with Allogeneic Transplantation.
Ahmad Asnawi, AW; Chong, SL; Koh, AZY; Lau, NS; Liew, PK; Md Fauzi, A; Selvaratnam, V; Tan, SM; Tang, ASO, 2023
)
0.91

Bioavailability

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Peptidomimetics have been developed to circumvent problems inherent in peptides such as poor bioavailability and protease-mediated degradation, while retaining biological activity."( Retro hydrazino-azapeptoids as peptidomimetics of proteasome inhibitors.
Arlot-Bonnemains, Y; Aubin, S; Baudy-Floc'h, M; Delcros, JG; Martin, B, 2005
)
0.33
" Herein, the potent, selective, and orally bioavailable threonine-derived 20S human proteasome inhibitor that has been advanced to preclinical development, [(1R)-1-[[(2 S,3 R)-3-hydroxy-2-[(6-phenylpyridine-2-carbonyl)amino]-1-oxobutyl]amino]-3-methylbutyl]boronic acid 20 (CEP-18770), is disclosed."( Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
Allievi, C; Ator, MA; Bernardini, R; Bernareggi, A; Cassarà, PG; Chatterjee, S; D'Arasmo, G; De Munari, S; Dorsey, BD; Ferretti, E; Iqbal, M; Mallamo, JP; Menta, E; Oliva, A; Pezzoni, G; Ruggeri, B; Strepponi, I; Williams, M, 2008
)
0.35
" A chemistry effort was initiated to discover orally bioavailable analogues of carfilzomib, which would have potential for improved dosing flexibility and patient convenience over intravenously administered agents."( Design and synthesis of an orally bioavailable and selective peptide epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor (PR-047).
Aujay, MA; Bennett, MK; Dajee, M; Demo, SD; Fang, Y; Ho, MN; Jiang, J; Kirk, CJ; Laidig, GJ; Lewis, ER; Lu, Y; Muchamuel, T; Parlati, F; Ring, E; Shenk, KD; Shields, J; Shwonek, PJ; Stanton, T; Sun, CM; Sylvain, C; Woo, TM; Yang, J; Zhou, HJ, 2009
)
0.35
" INCB16562 was developed as a novel, selective, and orally bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK2 markedly selective over JAK3."( INCB16562, a JAK1/2 selective inhibitor, is efficacious against multiple myeloma cells and reverses the protective effects of cytokine and stromal cell support.
Arvanitis, A; Caulder, E; Combs, AP; Favata, M; Fridman, JS; Kelley, JA; Li, J; Newton, R; Rogers, JD; Scherle, PA; Solomon, KA; Sparks, RB; Thomas, B; Vaddi, K; Wen, X, 2010
)
0.36
"One of the main functions of A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10) is to regulate the bioavailability of adhesion molecules and ligands to various cellular-signaling receptors."( Constitutive activation of metalloproteinase ADAM10 in mantle cell lymphoma promotes cell growth and activates the TNFα/NFκB pathway.
Anand, M; Armanious, H; Belch, A; Gelebart, P; Lai, R, 2011
)
0.37
" CYT387 is a novel, orally bioavailable JAK1/2 inhibitor, which has recently been described."( The novel JAK inhibitor CYT387 suppresses multiple signalling pathways, prevents proliferation and induces apoptosis in phenotypically diverse myeloma cells.
Burns, CJ; Khong, T; Monaghan, KA; Spencer, A, 2011
)
0.37
" The dietary polyphenol curcumin has been shown to exert anti-cancer activity in several cancer cell lines, but the effects of curcumin in solid tumors have been modest primarily due to poor water solubility and poor bioavailability in tissues remote from the gastrointestinal tract."( Sensitizing human multiple myeloma cells to the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib by novel curcumin analogs.
Chan, TH; Dou, QP; Kanwar, J; Mujtaba, T; Wan, SB, 2012
)
0.61
" Carfilzomib and its orally bioavailable analog oprozomib, effectively decreased MM cell viability following continual or transient treatment mimicking in vivo pharmacokinetics."( The epoxyketone-based proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib and orally bioavailable oprozomib have anti-resorptive and bone-anabolic activity in addition to anti-myeloma effects.
Blanco, JF; Collins, L; Garayoa, M; Garcia-Gomez, A; Hornick, MC; Hurchla, MA; Kirk, CJ; Li, A; Ocio, EM; Pandiella, A; Piwnica-Worms, D; San Miguel, JF; Tomasson, MH; Vij, R; Weilbaecher, KN, 2013
)
0.39
" To resolve these problems, we attempted to develop orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitors with distinct mechanisms of action and identified homopiperazine derivatives (HPDs) as promising candidates."( Homopiperazine derivatives as a novel class of proteasome inhibitors with a unique mode of proteasome binding.
Akutsu, M; Furukawa, Y; Izumi, T; Kano, Y; Kikuchi, J; Nobuyoshi, M; Ohki, M; Park, SY; Shibayama, N; Sugiyama, K; Wada, T; Yamada, S, 2013
)
0.39
" Carfilzomib and its orally bioavailable structural analog oprozomib are second-generation, highly-selective, proteasome inhibitors."( Carfilzomib and oprozomib synergize with histone deacetylase inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma models of acquired resistance to proteasome inhibitors.
Johnson, DE; Kirk, CJ; Zang, Y, 2014
)
0.4
" However, due to its too fast elimination and to the undesired related side effects, the improvement of sTRAIL in vivo bioavailability and the specific delivery to the tumour is mandatory for increasing its therapeutic efficacy."( sTRAIL coupled to liposomes improves its pharmacokinetic profile and overcomes neuroblastoma tumour resistance in combination with Bortezomib.
Becherini, P; Brignole, C; Cilli, M; Cossu, I; Destefanis, E; Di Paolo, D; Emionite, L; Giacomini, A; Loi, M; Pastorino, F; Perri, P; Piaggio, F; Ponzoni, M, 2014
)
0.61
" Entinostat is an orally bioavailable class I HDAC inhibitor with a long half-life, which is under evaluation in haematological and solid tumour malignancies."( Entinostat, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor is active in B-cell lymphoma and enhances the anti-tumour activity of rituximab and chemotherapy agents.
Barth, MJ; Czuczman, MS; Frys, S; Gu, JJ; Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, FJ; Hu, Q; Mavis, C; Simons, Z; Skitzki, J; Song, L, 2015
)
0.42
" Herein we describe our lead optimization efforts focused on in vitro potency, ADME, and pharmaceutical properties that led to the discovery of a potent, ATP-competitive, D2-selective, and orally bioavailable p97 inhibitor 71, CB-5083."( Discovery of a First-in-Class, Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable Inhibitor of the p97 AAA ATPase (CB-5083).
Anderson, DJ; Djakovic, S; Kiss von Soly, S; Kumar, A; Kumar, B; Le Moigne, R; Madriaga, A; Menon, MK; Parlati, F; Rice, J; Rolfe, M; Shawver, L; Soriano, F; Valle, E; Wang, J; Wong, S; Wustrow, D; Yakes, FM; Yao, B; Zhou, HJ, 2015
)
0.42
" In a pharmacokinetics study using rats, the bortezomib microemulsion failed to improve the bioavailability of the drug."( Formulation and Evaluation of a Self-microemulsifying Drug Delivery System Containing Bortezomib.
Hong, EP; Hwang, KM; Jeong, SY; Kim, DW; Kim, JY; Kim, SH; Lee, HJ; Park, CW; Park, ES; Weon, KY, 2016
)
0.92
" Many recent studies have investigated the safety of orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitors, such as ixazomib and oprozomib."( Proteasome inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.
Gibson, RJ; Stansborough, RL, 2017
)
0.46
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51

Dosage Studied

The best use of bortezomib to treat AMR should be evaluated in controlled trials using dosing strategies that include longer courses or retreatment schedules. The most common adverse events were 1-2 grade and tolerable 3 patients had to reduce the bortsomib dosage because of peripheral neuropathy or sinus bradycardia.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" These studies provided the rationale for a twice-weekly dosing schedule employed in ongoing clinical studies."( Development of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341.
Adams, J, 2002
)
0.31
" Additional studies are indicated to determine whether incorporation of dose/body surface area yields a superior PD model to dosing without normalization."( Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies.
Adams, J; Anderson, JK; Baldwin, AS; Bhagat, R; Depcik-Smith, ND; Elliott, PJ; Esseltine, DL; Guerciolini, R; Lehman, MJ; Mitchell, BS; Novick, SC; O'Connor, OA; Orlowski, RZ; Pien, CS; Shea, TC; Soignet, SL; Stahl, S; Stinchcombe, TE, 2002
)
0.31
" Phase I trials provided evidence of manageable toxicities and support a twice-weekly dosing regimen now being examined in a Phase III study."( Potential for proteasome inhibition in the treatment of cancer.
Adams, J, 2003
)
0.32
" dosing for the first 2 weeks of each 3-week cycle."( Velcade: U.S. FDA approval for the treatment of multiple myeloma progressing on prior therapy.
Bross, PF; Farrell, AT; Kane, RC; Pazdur, R, 2003
)
0.32
" These results were compared to analysis using the median-dose effect method, which generated complex drug interactions due to differences in dose-response curve sigmoidicities."( Bortezomib interactions with chemotherapy agents in acute leukemia in vitro.
Berg, SL; Blaney, SM; D'Argenio, DZ; Gannavarapu, A; Horton, TM; Plon, SE, 2006
)
1.78
" Phase I clinical trials established an optimal dosing strategy and demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile."( Bortezomib, a novel proteasome inhibitor, in the treatment of hematologic malignancies.
Einsele, H; Jackson, G; Miguel, JS; Moreau, P, 2005
)
1.77
" Studies are underway to explore different dosing strategies as well as ways to maximize patient benefit while reducing toxicity."( Optimizing the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in relapsed multiple myeloma.
Colson, K; Jagannath, S; Richardson, P, 2006
)
0.6
") The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, which induces strong apoptosis in cancer cells, abrogated proliferation and angiogenesis of HUVECs when used at a high concentration (100 nM), yet promoted both functions at a low dosage (10 nM)."( Hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1 alpha determines sensitivity of endothelial cells to the proteosome inhibitor bortezomib.
Belloni, D; Caligaris-Cappio, F; Cangi, MG; Ferrarini, M; Ferrero, E; Foglieni, C; Veschini, L, 2007
)
0.85
"Bortezomib was dosed on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (i."( Tissue distribution and depletion kinetics of bortezomib and bortezomib-related radioactivity in male rats after single and repeated intravenous injection of 14 C-bortezomib.
De Coster, R; Diels, L; Geerts, R; Hassler, S; Hemeryck, A; Janssen, C; Mamidi, RN; Monbaliu, J; van Beijsterveldt, L; Verhaeghe, T; Verluyten, W, 2007
)
2.04
"No undue tissue accumulation of TR and of bortezomib was observed in rats following a full clinical dosing cycle of bortezomib."( Tissue distribution and depletion kinetics of bortezomib and bortezomib-related radioactivity in male rats after single and repeated intravenous injection of 14 C-bortezomib.
De Coster, R; Diels, L; Geerts, R; Hassler, S; Hemeryck, A; Janssen, C; Mamidi, RN; Monbaliu, J; van Beijsterveldt, L; Verhaeghe, T; Verluyten, W, 2007
)
0.86
" The slower response in nodal disease may require prolonged therapy, perhaps with a less intensive dosing schedule to avoid early discontinuation because of toxicity."( Bortezomib is active in patients with untreated or relapsed Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: a phase II study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Chen, CI; Eisenhauer, E; Kouroukis, CT; Powers, J; Stadtmauer, E; Stewart, AK; Voralia, M; Walsh, W; White, D; Wright, JJ, 2007
)
1.78
" In this gene expression profiling study, we show that H-MM is defined by a protein biosynthesis signature that is primarily driven by a gene dosage mechanism as a result of trisomic chromosomes."( Molecular dissection of hyperdiploid multiple myeloma by gene expression profiling.
Ahmann, G; Bergsagel, PL; Bryant, B; Carpten, J; Chng, WJ; Chung, TH; Dispenzieri, A; Fonseca, R; Gertz, M; Greipp, P; Henderson, K; Kim, S; Kumar, S; Kyle, R; Lacy, M; Mulligan, G; Price-Troska, T; Rajkumar, SV; Vanwier, S, 2007
)
0.34
"Bortezomib was uniformly active against the PPTP's in vitro panel, with a median IC(50) of 23 nM and with a steep dose-response curve."( Initial testing (stage 1) of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib by the pediatric preclinical testing program.
Carol, H; Houghton, PJ; Keir, ST; Keshelava, N; Kolb, EA; Lock, R; Maris, JM; Morton, CL; Reynolds, CP; Smith, MA; Wu, J, 2008
)
2.04
" The antitumor efficacy of PR-171 delivered on 2 consecutive days is stronger than that of bortezomib administered on its clinical dosing schedule."( Antitumor activity of PR-171, a novel irreversible inhibitor of the proteasome.
Aujay, MA; Bennett, MK; Buchholz, TJ; Dajee, M; Demo, SD; Ho, MN; Jiang, J; Kirk, CJ; Laidig, GJ; Lewis, ER; Molineaux, CJ; Parlati, F; Shenk, KD; Smyth, MS; Sun, CM; Vallone, MK; Woo, TM, 2007
)
0.56
"The combination of bortezomib and celecoxib was well tolerated, without dose limiting toxicities observed throughout the dosing ranges tested, and will be studied further at the highest dose levels investigated."( Bortezomib in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I trial.
Chaudhary, U; Dunder, S; Green, M; Hayslip, J; Kraft, A; Meyer, M; Montero, AJ; Salzer, S; Sherman, C, 2007
)
2.11
"The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, dosage and administration, place in therapy, and cost of bortezomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma are reviewed."( Bortezomib: a novel chemotherapeutic agent for hematologic malignancies.
Kolesar, J; Utecht, KN, 2008
)
2
" At the RD, microarray analysis of transcriptional profiles was carried out before and after the first dosing in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)."( Phase I study of bortezomib with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours.
Bertoni, F; Capri, G; Catapano, CV; Cresta, S; Gallerani, E; Gianni, L; Maccioni, E; Maur, M; Passalacqua, D; Rinaldi, A; Sessa, C; Tosi, D; Viganò, L, 2008
)
0.69
"To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib based combination therapy for Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), and to determine the combination regimen, dosage and cycles in application of bortezomib for MM therapy."( [Bortezomib-based combination therapy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma].
Chen, YB; Fu, WJ; Hou, J; Wang, DX; Xi, H; Yuan, ZG, 2008
)
1.52
" With these drug therapies has come a more targeted approach to treatment enabling not only improved antimyeloma efficacy but also the use of decreased dosing enhancing the safety and tolerability of these regimens."( New drugs in multiple myeloma.
Berenson, JR; Yellin, O, 2008
)
0.35
" Bortezomib generally showed dose-response curves with a steep slope."( In vitro activity of bortezomib in cultures of patient tumour cells--potential utility in haematological malignancies.
Aleskog, A; Carlson, K; Larsson, R; Lindhagen, E; Nygren, P; Wiberg, K, 2009
)
1.58
" These events were predictable and often managed by dosage modifications and supportive therapy."( Pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin: a review of its use in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Plosker, GL, 2008
)
0.35
" 4) The most common adverse events were 1-2 grade and tolerable 3 patients had to reduce the bortezomib dosage because of peripheral neuropathy or sinus bradycardia."( [Outcome of bortezomib plus chemotherapy with or without stem cell transplantation for treatment of multiple myeloma].
Deng, SH; Qiu, LG; Wang, Y; Wang, YF; Wu, T; Xu, Y; Zhao, YZ; Zou, DH, 2008
)
0.94
" The plasma LC/MS biomolecular/biochemical profiles, comprised of thousands of endogenous small molecules, peptides and proteins, were determined for 10 multiple myeloma patients at predose and 24 h after initial dosing with bortezomib."( Elucidation of potential bortezomib response markers in mutliple myeloma patients.
Guerciolini, R; Hsieh, FY; Miwa, G; Pekol, TM; Tengstrand, E, 2009
)
0.84
" However, while bortezomib was highly cytotoxic to NK-92 cells in vitro, bortezomib treatment in vivo did not decrease NK-92 function, suggesting that through alternative dosing or timing of bortezomib, greater efficacy may occur from combined therapy."( Sensitization of human breast cancer cells to natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity by proteasome inhibition.
Ames, E; Hallett, WH; Murphy, WJ, 2009
)
0.7
" A chemistry effort was initiated to discover orally bioavailable analogues of carfilzomib, which would have potential for improved dosing flexibility and patient convenience over intravenously administered agents."( Design and synthesis of an orally bioavailable and selective peptide epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor (PR-047).
Aujay, MA; Bennett, MK; Dajee, M; Demo, SD; Fang, Y; Ho, MN; Jiang, J; Kirk, CJ; Laidig, GJ; Lewis, ER; Lu, Y; Muchamuel, T; Parlati, F; Ring, E; Shenk, KD; Shields, J; Shwonek, PJ; Stanton, T; Sun, CM; Sylvain, C; Woo, TM; Yang, J; Zhou, HJ, 2009
)
0.35
" Bortezomib-based combination therapies, with consideration for attenuated or intermittent dosing of bortezomib to minimize neuropathy, are under investigation."( Bortezomib in relapsed or refractory Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.
Chen, C; Eisenhauer, E; Kouroukis, CT; Powers, J; Stadtmauer, E; Stewart, AK; Voralia, M; Walsh, W; White, D; Wright, JJ, 2009
)
2.71
" Exploration of alternative schedules for bortezomib administration that includes weekly dosing should be pursued."( Primary therapy of Waldenström macroglobulinemia with bortezomib, dexamethasone, and rituximab: WMCTG clinical trial 05-180.
Birner, A; Boral, A; Diener, JG; Esseltine, DL; Ghobrial, IM; Ioakimidis, L; Keogh, GP; Matous, J; Mattern, J; Myers, TJ; Nelson, M; Patterson, CJ; Sheehy, P; Soumerai, JD; Treon, SP; Willen, M, 2009
)
0.87
" Serial blood samples were collected over the day-8 dosing interval (immediately prior to bortezomib administration, and from 5 minutes to 72 hours after administration) in cycles 1 and 2 for measurement of plasma bortezomib concentrations for noncompartmental PK analysis and blood 20S proteasome inhibition for PD analysis."( Effect of the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover drug-drug interaction study.
Chatta, G; Chen, E; Cooper, M; Egorin, M; Karol, M; Neuwirth, R; Rader, M; Ramalingam, S; Ramanathan, RK; Riordan, W; Trepicchio, W; Venkatakrishnan, K; von Moltke, L, 2009
)
0.79
" Moreover, antitumor activity was shown via multiple dosing routes, including oral gavage."( Evaluation of the proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in preclinical models of human cancer.
Bannerman, B; Berger, A; Blank, J; Bolen, J; Bruzzese, F; Cao, Y; Dick, L; Fitzgerald, M; Fleming, P; Garcia, K; Hales, P; Kupperman, E; Lee, EC; Liu, J; Manfredi, M; Rolfe, M; Tsu, C; Yang, Y; Yu, J; Yu, L, 2010
)
0.36
" Tests were performed during treatment and for 4weeks post dosing to evaluate electrophysiological, autonomic, pain sensibility and sensory-motor function changes."( Neurophysiological, histological and immunohistochemical characterization of bortezomib-induced neuropathy in mice.
Alé, A; Bruna, J; Monbaliu, J; Navarro, X; Silverman, L; Udina, E; Vilches, JJ; Vynckier, A, 2010
)
0.59
" Plasma clearance decreased with repeat dosing (102-112 L/h for first dose; 15-32 L/h following repeat dosing), with associated increases in systemic exposure and terminal half-life."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of two doses of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
Acharya, M; Burris, H; Chatta, G; Karol, M; Keith Stewart, A; Lonial, S; Mohrbacher, AF; Neuwirth, R; Reece, DE; Riordan, WJ; Shustik, C; Sullivan, D; Venkatakrishnan, K; von Moltke, LL; Zannikos, P, 2011
)
0.61
"3 mg/m(2) doses, with recovery toward baseline blood proteasome activity over the dosing interval following repeat dose administration, supporting the current clinical dosing regimen."( Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of two doses of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
Acharya, M; Burris, H; Chatta, G; Karol, M; Keith Stewart, A; Lonial, S; Mohrbacher, AF; Neuwirth, R; Reece, DE; Riordan, WJ; Shustik, C; Sullivan, D; Venkatakrishnan, K; von Moltke, LL; Zannikos, P, 2011
)
0.61
"The impact of cumulative dosing and premature drug discontinuation (PMDD) of bortezomib (V), thalidomide (T), and dexamethasone (D) on overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), time to next therapy, and post-relapse survival in Total Therapy 3 were examined, using time-dependent methodology, relevant to induction, peritransplantation, consolidation, and maintenance phases."( Total Therapy 3 for multiple myeloma: prognostic implications of cumulative dosing and premature discontinuation of VTD maintenance components, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone, relevant to all phases of therapy.
Alsayed, Y; Anaissie, E; Barlogie, B; Crowley, J; Hoering, A; Nair, B; Petty, N; Shaughnessy, JD; Szymonifka, J; van Rhee, F; Waheed, S, 2010
)
0.79
" In addition, both an earlier disease stage and Dex dosage had a significant impact on OS, while the attainment of VGPR within 2 cycles had a significantly longer PFS."( Bortezomib plus dexamethasone for relapsed or treatment refractory multiple myeloma: the collaborative study at six institutes in Kyoto and Osaka.
Akaogi, T; Hatsuse, M; Horiike, S; Iwai, T; Kamitsuji, Y; Kaneko, H; Kawata, E; Kiyota, M; Kobayashi, T; Kobayashi, Y; Koshida, M; Kuroda, J; Matsumoto, Y; Murakami, S; Okano, A; Shimazaki, C; Shimura, K; Tanaka, T; Taniwaki, M; Uchiyama, H; Ueda, S; Ueda, Y; Uoshima, N, 2010
)
1.8
"Human T-cell lymphoma cell lines Hut-78 and Jurkat were treated with increasing doses of everolimus, alone or in combination with doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine, or bortezomib, using different dosing schedules."( Schedule-dependent inhibition of T-cell lymphoma cells by cotreatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and anticancer drugs.
He, XX; Huang, JJ; Huang, Y; Li, ZM; Lin, TY; Tian, Y; Xiao, J, 2012
)
0.57
" With certain dosing schedules, everolimus showed synergism with doxorubicin, etoposide, and bortezomib, but antagonism with vincristine."( Schedule-dependent inhibition of T-cell lymphoma cells by cotreatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and anticancer drugs.
He, XX; Huang, JJ; Huang, Y; Li, ZM; Lin, TY; Tian, Y; Xiao, J, 2012
)
0.6
" The best use of bortezomib to treat AMR should be evaluated in controlled trials using dosing strategies that include longer courses or retreatment schedules."( The role of proteasome inhibition with bortezomib in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection after kidney-only or kidney-combined organ transplantation.
Askar, M; Banning, S; Chiesa-Vottero, A; Fatica, R; Flechner, SM; Koo, A; Poggio, E; Srinivas, T; Stephany, BR, 2010
)
0.97
" Toxicities were mainly diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue and herpes zoster, and 7 evaluable patients who had toxicities were adjusted dosage and 2 of them interrupted therapy."( [Treatment of primary systemic amyloidosis with the combination of bortezomib and dexamethasone].
Li, F; Liu, HN; Song, P; Wang, XW; Yu, YP; Zhai, YP; Zhou, XG, 2010
)
0.6
" A randomized phase II study is under way to further compare toxicity and efficacy of the 2 dosing schedules."( Phase I trial of weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone in relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Dumitrescu, O; Gerecitano, J; Hamlin, P; Horanlli, E; Iasonos, A; Mo, Q; Moskowitz, CH; Noy, A; O'Connor, OA; Pappanicholaou, J; Portlock, C; Rojas, CN; Sarasohn, D; Schulman, P; Straus, D; Zelenetz, AD; Zhang, Z, 2011
)
0.64
" Antitumor activity of bortezomib in combination with EGCG or ascorbic acid was determined using several dosing regimens to evaluate different target plasma concentrations of EGCG and ascorbic acid."( Preclinical evaluation of the antitumor activity of bortezomib in combination with vitamin C or with epigallocatechin gallate, a component of green tea.
Bannerman, B; Berger, A; Bolen, J; Claiborne, C; Dick, L; Fleming, P; Hales, P; Jones, M; Kupperman, E; Manfredi, M; Monbaliu, J; Tsu, C; Xu, L; Yu, J, 2011
)
0.93
" Clinical data demonstrate that patients exposed to higher than recommended doses of bortezomib on the standard twice-weekly dosing schedule are likely to have an increased risk of major toxicities."( Analysis of two commercially available bortezomib products: differences in assay of active agent and impurity profile.
Byrn, SR; Milton, MJ; Tishmack, PA; van de Velde, H, 2011
)
0.86
"To determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and maximum tolerated dose of bortezomib in patients with renal impairment and to develop dosing guidelines for such a patient population."( Dose-escalating and pharmacological study of bortezomib in adult cancer patients with impaired renal function: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group Study.
Davies, A; Egorin, MJ; Hamilton, A; Ivy, SP; Leal, TB; Lenz, HJ; LoRusso, PA; Mani, S; Mier, J; Mulkerin, D; Neuwirth, R; Ramanathan, RK; Remick, SC; Sarantopoulos, J; Shibata, S; Takimoto, CH; Venkatakrishnan, K; von Moltke, L; Wright, JJ, 2011
)
0.85
" Of note, once-weekly bortezomib dosing (in combination with MP±T) was shown to reduce the incidence of peripheral neuropathy and gastrointestinal events compared with twice-weekly dosing, while maintaining efficacy."( Practical management of adverse events in multiple myeloma: can therapy be attenuated in older patients?
Bringhen, S; Mateos, MV; Palumbo, A; San Miguel, JF, 2011
)
0.68
" Additional trials are needed to better define the optimal dosing in such patients."( A phase I study of bortezomib and temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Chow, W; Chung, V; Cristea, M; Frankel, P; Koehler, S; Leong, L; Lim, D; Martel, C; Morgan, R; Portnow, J; Reckamp, K; Shibata, S; Synold, TW; Twardowski, P, 2012
)
0.71
" Finally, the prevention and management of bortezomib-induced side effects, including the latest data on weekly dosing for untreated elderly patients, is focused on."( Bortezomib for previously untreated multiple myeloma.
Delforge, M, 2011
)
2.07
" Nevertheless, continued efforts to implement newer dosing regimens and to identify new partner drugs for bortezomib remain an important challenge."( Bortezomib for previously untreated multiple myeloma.
Delforge, M, 2011
)
2.03
" Our modified schedule and dosing regimen achieved a high overall response rate of 86%, while showing a marked decrease in the incidence and severity of peripheral neuropathy, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and myelosuppression compared to the standard dosing on a 3-week cycle using these drugs."( A modified regimen of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVD) is effective and well tolerated for previously untreated multiple myeloma patients.
Berenson, JR; Bessudo, A; Boccia, RV; Chen, CS; Eades, B; Hilger, J; Hilger, JD; Mapes, R; Nassir, Y; Patel, R; Swift, RA; Vescio, R; Wirtschafter, E; Yang, HH; Yellin, O; Yung, E, 2011
)
0.62
" SKP2 gene dosage was determined in 82 independent tumors for clinical correlates."( Characterization of gene amplification-driven SKP2 overexpression in myxofibrosarcoma: potential implications in tumor progression and therapeutics.
Fang, FM; Huang, CK; Huang, HY; Kang, HY; Lan, J; Lee, JC; Li, CF; Li, SH; Shiue, YL; Wang, JM; Wang, JW; Wang, YH; Wu, LC; Wu, WR; Yu, SC, 2012
)
0.38
" This study (NCI-6432; NCT00091117) was conducted to evaluate bortezomib pharmacokinetics and safety in patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment, to inform dosing recommendations in these special populations."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of liver dysfunction: phase I NCI Organ Dysfunction Working Group Study NCI-6432.
Dowlati, A; Esseltine, DL; Hamilton, A; Ivy, P; LoRusso, PM; Mani, S; Mulkerin, D; Neuwirth, R; Ramanathan, RK; Rudek, MA; Sarantopoulos, J; Shibata, SI; Takimoto, CH; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2012
)
0.91
" In MM, Phase I/II clinical trials have established the optimal dosing schedule for perifosine and bortezomib in combination, and demonstrated that perifosine can sensitize to, or overcome resistance to, bortezomib, associated with prolonged responses and a favorable side effect profile."( Perifosine , an oral, anti-cancer agent and inhibitor of the Akt pathway: mechanistic actions, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity.
Anderson, KC; Eng, C; Hideshima, T; Kolesar, J; Richardson, PG, 2012
)
0.6
" The primary objective was to determine the safest and best tolerated maintenance dosing (MD) of bortezomib (B)."( Phase I trial of bortezomib during maintenance phase after high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.
Abidi, MH; Abrams, J; Al-Kadhimi, Z; Ayash, L; Deol, A; Gul, Z; Lum, L; Mellon-Reppen, S; Ratanatharathorn, V; Uberti, J; Ventimiglia, M; Zonder, J, 2012
)
0.94
" In this phase 2, open-label, multicentre clinical trial, 35 patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM following 1-3 prior therapies, including at least one bortezomib-based regimen, received carfilzomib 20 mg/m(2) in a twice-weekly, consecutive-day dosing schedule for ≤12 monthly cycles."( An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study of single-agent carfilzomib in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who have been previously treated with bortezomib.
Bahlis, N; Belch, A; Jagannath, S; Jakubowiak, AJ; Kunkel, LA; McDonagh, K; Siegel, DS; Stewart, AK; Vij, R; Wang, M; Wear, S; Wong, AF, 2012
)
0.77
" Concomitant inhibition of both pathways markedly enhances the efficacy of bortezomib against cervical cancer cells and thus may be applied to reduce the bortezomib dosage required for efficient cervical cancer treatment."( Eeyarestatin causes cervical cancer cell sensitization to bortezomib treatment by augmenting ER stress and CHOP expression.
Brem, GJ; Brüning, A; Mylonas, I, 2013
)
0.86
" Increasing gene dosage of more than half of the missense alleles fully restored function."( Proteasome inhibition rescues clinically significant unstable variants of the mismatch repair protein Msh2.
Arlow, T; Gammie, A; Scott, K; Wagenseller, A, 2013
)
0.39
" In newly diagnosed, older patients, modification of the biweekly dosing schedule to weekly regimens improves tolerability whilst maintaining efficacy."( Weekly intravenous bortezomib is effective and well tolerated in relapsed/refractory myeloma.
Atwal, S; D'Sa, S; Johnston, R; Khan, I; Moore, S; Narat, S; Percy, L; Rabin, N; Sachchithanantham, S; Schey, S; Streetly, M; Yong, K, 2013
)
0.72
" Dose-response of different concentrations of bortezomib and SAHA on inhibition of cell proliferation of NPC was determined."( Bortezomib and SAHA synergistically induce ROS-driven caspase-dependent apoptosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and block replication of Epstein-Barr virus.
Chiang, AK; Ho, DN; Hui, KF; Lam, BH; Tsao, SW, 2013
)
2.09
" The optimum dosing combination of these two agents has yet to be determined however, and in many patients it is likely that greater overall survival will be achieved by using them in successive lines rather than in combination."( New oxaliplatin-based combinations in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Cassidy, J; Hochster, H, 2003
)
0.32
" Therefore, dosing schedules for proteasome inhibitors warrant further study to maximize anabolic actions without compromising anti-MM activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM)."( Activating transcription factor 4, an ER stress mediator, is required for, but excessive ER stress suppresses osteoblastogenesis by bortezomib.
Abe, M; Amou, H; Fujii, S; Harada, T; Hiasa, M; Kagawa, K; Kido, S; Matsumoto, T; Miki, H; Nakamura, S; Nakano, A; Oda, A; Ozaki, S; Takeuchi, K; Watanabe, K, 2013
)
0.59
" Cyclophosphamide (CY) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been the conventional preparation for hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) mobilization, although the optimal dosage of CY in this setting has not yet been clearly defined."( Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for multiple myeloma.
Horiike, S; Kaneko, H; Kawata-Iida, E; Kobayashi, T; Kobayashi, Y; Kuroda, J; Matsumoto, Y; Mizutani, S; Nagoshi, H; Shimazaki, C; Shimura, Y; Taniwaki, M; Tsutsumi, Y; Uchiyama, H; Yamamoto-Sugitani, M, 2013
)
0.39
" Blood samples were obtained on days 1 and 9 of cycle 1 prior to dosing and 2 and 6 h post-dosing in all 60 subjects."( Vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies directly alters transcription of target genes.
Alberti, D; Bailey, HH; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Hoang, T; Holen, KD; Kim, K; Kolesar, JM; Schelman, WR; Seo, S; Traynor, AM; Wilding, G; Wright, JJ, 2013
)
0.68
" PK studies at dose levels 1 and 2 showed greater mean ultrafiltrable platinum when oxaliplatin was dosed after bortezomib."( A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin and bortezomib: activity, but dose-limiting neurotoxicity.
Beric, A; Hochster, H; Ivy, P; Joseph, SO; Kobrinsky, B; Liebes, L; Malankar, A; Muggia, F, 2013
)
0.85
" Bortezomib dosing was increased using a standard phase I dose-escalation schema."( A phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies.
Alberti, D; Ames, MM; Attia, S; Bailey, HH; Eickhoff, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Hoang, T; Holen, KD; Jiang, Z; Kolesar, JM; Marnocha, R; McGovern, RM; Reid, JM; Schelman, WR; Traynor, AM; Wilding, G; Wright, JJ, 2013
)
1.55
" We previously examined a once-daily continuous dosing schedule of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib which was well tolerated in cycles 1 and 2; however, there was concern regarding the tolerability through multiple cycles."( A Phase I study of intermittently dosed vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Alberti, D; Ames, MM; Bailey, HH; Deming, DA; Eickhoff, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Kolesar, JM; Marnocha, R; McGovern, RM; Ninan, J; Reid, JM; Schelman, WR; Wilding, G; Wright, J, 2014
)
0.85
" DLTs in the intermittent dosing scheduled included thrombocytopenia and fatigue."( A Phase I study of intermittently dosed vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Alberti, D; Ames, MM; Bailey, HH; Deming, DA; Eickhoff, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Kolesar, JM; Marnocha, R; McGovern, RM; Ninan, J; Reid, JM; Schelman, WR; Wilding, G; Wright, J, 2014
)
0.64
" Tolerability was not improved with the intermittent dosing schedule of vorinostat when compared to continuous dosing."( A Phase I study of intermittently dosed vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Alberti, D; Ames, MM; Bailey, HH; Deming, DA; Eickhoff, J; Espinoza-Delgado, I; Kolesar, JM; Marnocha, R; McGovern, RM; Ninan, J; Reid, JM; Schelman, WR; Wilding, G; Wright, J, 2014
)
0.64
" Qualifying statements by the HDSG address alternative dosing options, the management of cytopenias and the prevention of toxicities, including herpes zoster reactivation."( Bortezomib in multiple myeloma: a practice guideline.
Baldassarre, FG; Cheung, MC; Haynes, AE; Imrie, K; Kouroukis, CT; Reece, DE, 2014
)
1.85
" After oral or intraperitoneal dosing of mice, RA190 distributed to plasma and major organs except the brain and inhibited proteasome function in skin and muscle."( A bis-benzylidine piperidone targeting proteasome ubiquitin receptor RPN13/ADRM1 as a therapy for cancer.
Anchoori, RK; Chen, X; Hung, CF; Jiang, R; Karanam, B; Matsui, W; Orlowski, RZ; Peng, S; Roden, RB; Rudek, MA; Tanno, T; Walters, KJ; Wang, JW; Zhao, M, 2013
)
0.39
" Drugs for multiple myeloma therapy are significantly removed with both HCO and PFX, with important implications for the dosing and timing of administration, particularly in patients with cast nephropathy receiving extended dialysis."( Clearance of drugs for multiple myeloma therapy during in vitro high-cutoff hemodialysis.
Devine, E; Krause, B; Krieter, DH; Lemke, HD; Storr, M; Wanner, C, 2014
)
0.4
" We illustrate the implementation of the technique in the context of phase I trials that consider multiple toxicities and phase I/II trials where dosing decisions are based on both toxicity and efficacy, and apply the benchmark to several clinical examples considered in the literature."( Simple benchmark for complex dose finding studies.
Cheung, YK, 2014
)
0.4
"Substantial efficacy has been demonstrated with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone in phase III studies in transplant-ineligible myeloma patients using various twice-weekly and once-weekly bortezomib dosing schedules."( Bortezomib cumulative dose, efficacy, and tolerability with three different bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone regimens in previously untreated myeloma patients ineligible for high-dose therapy.
Boccadoro, M; Bringhen, S; Desai, A; Di Raimondo, F; Esseltine, DL; García-Sanz, R; Lahuerta, JJ; Larocca, A; Londhe, A; Mateos, MV; Oriol, A; Palumbo, A; Richardson, PG; San Miguel, JF; van de Velde, H, 2014
)
2.1
" Peripheral neuropathy was assessed using neurotoxicity subscale of the FACT/GOG-Ntx at daily clinical practice; physicians modified the dosage and schedule of bortezomib treatment."( Impact of dose modification on intravenous bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients.
Cho, J; Kang, D; Kim, K; Kim, SJ; Lee, JY, 2014
)
0.86
" Using 2 mL as the maximum volume for injection would mean that many patients receiving bortezomib will receive two injections during each visit with common dosing parameters."( Tolerability of Velcade (Bortezomib) subcutaneous administration using a maximum volume of 3 mL per injection site.
Brandle, I; Chen, C; Dara, C; Incekol, D; Kaufman, M; Kukreti, V; Lee, R; Ng, P; Paisley, E; Reece, D; Tiedemann, R; Trudel, S, 2015
)
0.94
" Prednisone was dosed at ."( A phase II study of bortezomib plus prednisone for initial therapy of chronic graft-versus-host disease.
Alyea, EP; Antin, JH; Armand, P; Bindra, B; Blazar, BR; Cutler, CS; Herrera, AF; Ho, VT; Jones, KT; Kim, HT; Koreth, J; Nikiforow, S; Ritz, J; Soiffer, RJ, 2014
)
0.73
" Pharmacokinetic findings with the current dosing regimen were consistent with the comparable literature and the hybrid dosing regimen."( Phase I trial of bortezomib (PS-341; NSC 681239) and "nonhybrid" (bolus) infusion schedule of alvocidib (flavopiridol; NSC 649890) in patients with recurrent or refractory indolent B-cell neoplasms.
Baz, RC; Bose, P; Colevas, AD; Coppola, D; Dawson, J; Doyle, LA; Figg, WD; Grant, S; Hogan, KT; Holkova, B; Honeycutt, C; Kang, L; Kmieciak, M; Peer, CJ; Perkins, EB; Ramakrishnan, V; Roberts, JD; Roodman, GD; Sankala, H; Shrader, E; Stuart, RK; Sullivan, D; Tombes, MB; Wan, W; Weir-Wiggins, C; Wellons, M, 2014
)
0.74
" As the nonhybrid regimen is less cumbersome than the previous hybrid dosing schedule regimen, the current schedule is recommended for successor studies."( Phase I trial of bortezomib (PS-341; NSC 681239) and "nonhybrid" (bolus) infusion schedule of alvocidib (flavopiridol; NSC 649890) in patients with recurrent or refractory indolent B-cell neoplasms.
Baz, RC; Bose, P; Colevas, AD; Coppola, D; Dawson, J; Doyle, LA; Figg, WD; Grant, S; Hogan, KT; Holkova, B; Honeycutt, C; Kang, L; Kmieciak, M; Peer, CJ; Perkins, EB; Ramakrishnan, V; Roberts, JD; Roodman, GD; Sankala, H; Shrader, E; Stuart, RK; Sullivan, D; Tombes, MB; Wan, W; Weir-Wiggins, C; Wellons, M, 2014
)
0.74
"A prospective iterative trial of proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based therapy for reducing HLA antibody (Ab) levels was conducted in five phases differing in bortezomib dosing density and plasmapheresis timing."( Prospective iterative trial of proteasome inhibitor-based desensitization.
Abu Jawdeh, BG; Alloway, RR; Brailey, P; Cardi, MA; Ejaz, NS; Girnita, A; Govil, A; Mogilishetty, G; Roy-Chaudhury, P; Sadaka, B; Shields, AR; Walsh, RC; Woodle, ES, 2015
)
0.62
" We hypothesized that bortezomib may abrogate neutralizing Ab levels, making dosing of RIT possible in mice already immune to RIT."( Bortezomib reduces pre-existing antibodies to recombinant immunotoxins in mice.
Manning, ML; Mason-Osann, E; Onda, M; Pastan, I, 2015
)
2.17
" We report a phase II trial of alternate dosing and schedule of bortezomib and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are not eligible for or refused autologous stem cell transplantation."( A Phase II trial of weekly bortezomib and dexamethasone in veterans with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma not eligible for or who deferred autologous stem cell transplantation.
Behler, C; Efebera, YA; Girnius, SK; Grady, T; Han, A; Hayes, TG; Houranieh, A; Kambhampati, S; Klein, CE; Lee, S; Lichtenstein, A; Mehta, P; Mohiuddin, A; Munshi, NC; Prabhala, RH; Roodman, GD; Rose, MG; Yellapragada, SV; Zimelman, A, 2015
)
0.95
" Treatment-specific tools and clinical assessments can be useful for optimizing dosing and schedule adjustments to increase therapy duration, and implementing supportive care strategies (e."( Treatment-related symptom management in patients with multiple myeloma: a review.
Colson, K, 2015
)
0.42
" In addition to appropriate drug dosing and administration, effective supportive care and health maintenance are crucial for maximizing quality of life and disease control."( Treatment-related symptom management in patients with multiple myeloma: a review.
Colson, K, 2015
)
0.42
" Our results indicate that to have the most synergistic anticancer effect, the drugs in the optimized regimen should be dosage specific and ratio specific."( Optimized combinations of bortezomib, camptothecin, and doxorubicin show increased efficacy and reduced toxicity in treating oral cancer.
Ding, X; Matsuo, K; Xu, L; Yang, J; Zheng, L, 2015
)
0.72
" The dosage and time of therapy need to be explored in the future; additional studies of large samples are needed."( BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy with Plasma Cell-Rich Infiltrates Treated by Bortezomib-Based Regimen.
Chen, JS; Cheng, DR; Ji, SM; Li, X; Liu, ZH; Wen, JQ; Wu, D; Xie, KN; Zhang, MC, 2015
)
0.65
" Dosage and treatment decisions were at the discretion of the physicians."( Bortezomib-containing regimens are effective in multiple myeloma--results of a non-interventional phase IV study.
Alkemper, B; Gaede, B; Knauf, W; Reschke, D; Schlag, R; Schmits, R; Schütz, S; Schwarzer, A; Tapprich, C, 2015
)
1.86
"The authors conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial of combined temsirolimus and bortezomib in patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) using a dosing scheme that was previously tested in multiple myeloma."( A phase 2 study of weekly temsirolimus and bortezomib for relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A Wisconsin Oncology Network study.
Ahuja, H; Baim, AE; Blank, JH; Farnen, JP; Fenske, TS; Kahl, BS; Kim, KM; Mansky, P; Mattison, RJ; Onitilo, AA; Qamar, R; Saha, S; Shah, NM; Traynor, AM; Wassenaar, T; Zhang, C, 2015
)
0.91
" We used these screening methods to evaluate the dependencies of seven patient-derived cell models: three grown on laminin and four grown as neurospheres, against 56 agents in 17-point dose-response curves in 384-well format in triplicate."( High-Throughput Screening of Patient-Derived Cultures Reveals Potential for Precision Medicine in Glioblastoma.
deCarvalho, AC; Mikkelsen, T; Quartararo, CE; Reznik, E; Stockwell, BR, 2015
)
0.42
" Human plasma bortezomib PK profiles following multiple IV dosing (1."( Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of target-mediated drug disposition of bortezomib in mice.
Mager, DE; Zhang, L, 2015
)
1
" An in silico pharmacodynamic model using established effects of each of these agents on the cell cycle was used to validate the regimen and to guide the dosing regimen."( Novel phase I study combining G1 phase, S phase, and G2/M phase cell cycle inhibitors in patients with advanced malignancies.
Gad, Y; Helgason, T; Hong, DS; Jain, RK; Kurzrock, R; Naing, A; Shi, NY; Wheler, J, 2015
)
0.42
" Conversely, the MG132 dose-response curve was unaffected by co-administration of EGCG."( EGCG antagonizes Bortezomib cytotoxicity in prostate cancer cells by an autophagic mechanism.
Bettuzzi, S; Bonacini, M; Giovanna Troglio, M; Modernelli, A; Naponelli, V; Ramazzina, I; Rizzi, F, 2015
)
0.76
" To determine the optimal dosing schedule of once weekly bortezomib (BTZ) combined with lenalidomide (LEN) and dexamethasone (DEX), especially in the outpatient setting, we conducted a phase I dose escalation study."( Phase I study of once weekly treatment with bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Hagiwara, S; Iida, S; Ishida, T; Ito, A; Kanamori, T; Kato, C; Kinoshita, S; Komatsu, H; Kusumoto, S; Masuda, A; Murakami, S; Nakashima, T; Narita, T; Ri, M; Suzuki, N; Totani, H; Yoshida, T, 2016
)
0.94
" This prompted us to explore the concept of less intense drug dosing with shorter intervals between courses with the aim of preventing inter-course relapse."( Dose-dense and less dose-intense Total Therapy 5 for gene expression profiling-defined high-risk multiple myeloma.
Alapat, D; Avery, D; Bailey, C; Barlogie, B; Crowley, J; Epstein, J; Heuck, CJ; Hoering, A; Jethava, Y; Khan, R; Mitchell, A; Morgan, G; Petty, N; Sawyer, J; Schinke, C; Smith, R; Stein, C; Steward, D; Thanendrarajan, S; Tian, E; van Rhee, F; Waheed, S; Yaccoby, S; Zangari, M, 2016
)
0.43
"Stem cell transplantation (SCT), an effective therapy for amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis patients, is associated with low treatment-related mortality (TRM) with appropriate patient selection and risk-adapted dosing of melphalan (RA-SCT)."( Long-term event-free and overall survival after risk-adapted melphalan and SCT for systemic light chain amyloidosis.
Bello, C; Chou, JF; Comenzo, RL; Devlin, SM; Giralt, S; Hassoun, H; Landau, H; Landry, C; Smith, M, 2017
)
0.46
" Increased p21 and cleaved PARP expression can potentially explain mechanisms of their enhanced effects, which require further PK/PD systems analysis to suggest an optimal dosing regimen."( Sequential Exposure of Bortezomib and Vorinostat is Synergistic in Multiple Myeloma Cells.
Mager, DE; Nanavati, C, 2017
)
0.77
" Logistic regression models were utilized to determine relationships, identify subpopulations with different responses, and optimize the venetoclax dosage that balanced both efficacy and safety."( Moving Beyond Maximum Tolerated Dose for Targeted Oncology Drugs: Use of Clinical Utility Index to Optimize Venetoclax Dosage in Multiple Myeloma Patients.
Freise, KJ; Jones, AK; Maciag, PC; Menon, RM; Salem, AH; Verdugo, ME, 2017
)
0.46
" On day 1 of cycle 1, seven whole-blood samples were collected for 3 h after dosing completion to obtain the maximum plasma concentration and area under the time-concentration curve during 3 h postdose (AUC0-3) in each patient."( Bortezomib pharmacokinetics in tumor response and peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib-containing therapy.
Choi, K; Han, S; Hong, T; Lee, J; Lee, SE; Min, CK; Park, GJ; Yim, DS, 2017
)
1.9
" We retrospectively analysed PN rates from 32 studies (2697 patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma) incorporating bortezomib and differing dexamethasone schedules: partnered dosing (days of and after bortezomib), weekly dosing, and other dosing schedules (e."( Impact of concomitant dexamethasone dosing schedule on bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma.
Giove, TJ; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Neuwirth, R; Quick, M; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Yung, G, 2017
)
0.91
" The incidences of several key AEs were lower in both arms following the planned reduction of bortezomib dosing frequency in TP2."( Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone: impact of dose intensity and administration frequency on safety in the PANORAMA 1 trial.
Beksac, M; Corrado, C; Dimopoulos, MA; Einsele, H; Elghandour, A; Guenther, A; Hou, J; Hungria, VTM; Jedrzejczak, WW; Lee, JH; Lonial, S; Moreau, P; Na Nakorn, T; Paul, S; Redhu, S; Richardson, PG; Salwender, H; San-Miguel, JF; Schlossman, RL; Siritanaratkul, N; Sopala, M; Yoon, SS, 2017
)
1.01
" The antimyeloma activity of KW-2478 in combination with BTZ as scheduled in this trial appeared relatively modest; however, the good tolerability of the combination would support further exploration of alternate dosing schedules and combinations."( A phase I/II study of KW-2478, an Hsp90 inhibitor, in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Akinaga, S; Baetiong-Caguioa, P; Cavenagh, J; Davies, F; Gharibo, M; Kurman, M; Nakashima, D; Novak, B; Oakervee, H; Rabin, N; Shiraishi, N; Yong, K, 2017
)
0.69
" Results A total of eighteen patients were dosed in 3 bortezomib cohorts (0."( Phase I trial of bortezomib daily dose: safety, pharmacokinetic profile, biological effects and early clinical evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Angevin, E; Bahleda, R; Bernard, A; Chaturvedi, S; Deutsch, E; Gazzah, A; Hanley, M; Hollebecque, A; Le Deley, MC; Massard, C; Poterie, A; Ribrag, V; Ricard, D; Sallansonnet-Froment, M; Soria, JC; Taillia, H; Touat, M; Van De Velde, H; Varga, A, 2018
)
1.07
" This article critically reviews and summarizes the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bortezomib at various dosing levels and routes of administration as well as in specific patient subsets."( Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bortezomib.
Abdul-Majeed, S; Barta, SK; Cael, B; Tan, CRC, 2019
)
0.98
" Using various dosing schedules, the majority of patients (684/694) received daratumumab at a dose of 16 mg/kg."( Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses of Daratumumab in Combination Therapy Regimens for Patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Belch, A; Capra, M; Clemens, PL; Dimopoulos, MA; Gomez, D; Ho, PJ; Iida, S; Jansson, R; Leiba, M; Medvedova, E; Min, CK; Schecter, J; Sonneveld, P; Sun, YN; Xu, XS; Zhang, L, 2018
)
0.48
"These data support the recommended 16 mg/kg dose of daratumumab and the respective dosing schedules in the POLLUX and CASTOR pivotal studies."( Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses of Daratumumab in Combination Therapy Regimens for Patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Belch, A; Capra, M; Clemens, PL; Dimopoulos, MA; Gomez, D; Ho, PJ; Iida, S; Jansson, R; Leiba, M; Medvedova, E; Min, CK; Schecter, J; Sonneveld, P; Sun, YN; Xu, XS; Zhang, L, 2018
)
0.48
" The interaction model is based on codifying multiple regulatory mechanisms of drug action and provides a platform for probing optimized bortezomib and dexamethasone combination dosing regimens to minimize skeletal side effects during myeloma therapy."( Systems Modeling of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Combinatorial Effects on Bone Homeostasis in Multiple Myeloma Patients.
Mager, DE; Zhang, L, 2019
)
1.04
" Mice dosed with INCB (30 mg/kg) showed significant reductions in tumor volume on days 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, and 63."( The anti-myeloma effects of the selective JAK1 inhibitor (INCB052793) alone and in combination in vitro and in vivo.
Berenson, JR; Chen, H; Hekmati, T; Li, M; Nosrati, JD; Patil, S; Sanchez, E; Schlossberg, RE; Soof, CM; Tanenbaum, EJ; Tang, G; Vidisheva, A; Wang, C; Zahab, B, 2019
)
0.51
" This model can be used to further optimize dosing of bortezomib."( A Semi-Mechanistic Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model of Bortezomib in Pediatric Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Attarbaschi, A; Baruchel, A; Beijnen, JH; De Moerloose, B; Dorlo, TPC; Fagioli, F; Huitema, ADR; Janssen, JM; Kaspers, GJL; Klingebiel, T; Niewerth, D; Palumbo, G; von Stackelberg, A; Wilhelm, AJ; Zwaan, CM, 2020
)
1.04
" The management of CIPN is a significant challenge, as it is not possible to predict which patients will develop symptoms, the timing for the appearance of symptoms can develop anytime during the chemotherapy course, there are no early indications that warrant a reduction in the dosage to halt CIPN progression, and there are no drugs approved to prevent or alleviate CIPN."( Prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A review of recent findings.
Ehrlich, BE; Ibrahim, EY, 2020
)
0.56
" Bortezomib was administered at the standard dosing and in combined therapy with corticosteroids, chemotherapy or thalidomide."( Bortezomib retreatment is effective in relapsed multiple myeloma patients - real-life clinical practice data.
Brozova, L; Gregora, E; Hajek, R; Jelinek, T; Jungova, A; Maisnar, V; Minarik, J; Pour, L; Sevcikova, S; Spicka, I; Stork, M; Velichova, R, 2020
)
2.91
" Increased cumulative dosing levels, intravenous compared with subcutaneous administration and combination therapy with thalidomide were associated with higher rates of BIPN."( Characteristics and risk factors of bortezomib induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review of phase III trials.
Goldstein, D; Kiernan, MC; King, T; Li, T; Park, SB; Timmins, HC, 2020
)
0.83
" In addition, model simulations confirm that a once-weekly dosing schedule represents an optimal therapeutic regimen with comparable antineoplastic activity but significantly reduced risk of thrombocytopenia."( Population-based meta-analysis of bortezomib exposure-response relationships in multiple myeloma patients.
Mager, DE; Zhang, L, 2020
)
0.84
" Furthermore, careful consideration should be given to different methods of storing diluted pharmaceutical drugs and use of DMSO controls due to the potential risk of evaporation and the subsequent effect on dose-response curves."( Optimization of cell viability assays to improve replicability and reproducibility of cancer drug sensitivity screens.
Biermann, J; Engqvist, H; Forssell-Aronsson, E; Helou, K; Karlsson, P; Kovács, A; Larsson, P; Parris, TZ; Werner Rönnerman, E, 2020
)
0.56
" The phase III VISTA trial established the bortezomib dosing schedule for VMP."( Comparative Efficacy of Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone (VMP) With or Without Daratumumab Versus VMP Alone in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Propensity Score Matching of ALCYONE and VISTA Phase III Studies.
Cavo, M; Deraedt, W; Dimopoulos, MA; He, J; Jakubowiak, A; Kampfenkel, T; Lam, A; Mateos, MV; Qi, M; San-Miguel, J, 2020
)
1.13
" A weekly dosing regimen of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone combined with medium dose prednisone in between were deployed."( Acute Kidney Injury Caused by TAFRO Syndrome in a Chinese Patient: Efficacy of Long-Term Corticosteroids Combined with Bortezomib and Cyclophosphamide.
Chen, L; Li, J; Li, R; Li, X; Qin, Y; Shi, X; Wang, J; Xia, P; Zhang, L; Zhang, T; Zou, M, 2020
)
1.06
" The most appropriate delivery and dosing regimens of these therapies for patients at advanced age and frailty status is also unclear."( Optimising the value of immunomodulatory drugs during induction and maintenance in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from Myeloma XI, a multicentre, open-label, randomised, Phase III trial.
Cairns, DA; Collett, C; Cook, G; Davies, FE; Drayson, MT; Garg, M; Gregory, WM; Jackson, GH; Jenner, MW; Jones, JR; Kaiser, MF; Karunanithi, K; Kishore, B; Lindsay, J; Morgan, GJ; Owen, RG; Pawlyn, C; Russell, NH; Striha, A; Taylor, C; Waterhouse, A; Williams, CD; Wilson, J, 2021
)
0.62
" We investigated the activity and safety of three different dosing regimens of oral panobinostat in combination with subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone for this indication."( Efficacy and safety of oral panobinostat plus subcutaneous bortezomib and oral dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (PANORAMA 3): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study.
Abdo, A; Beksac, M; Bladé, J; Chari, A; Dimopoulos, MA; Gonçalves, IZ; Hájek, R; Hungria, VTM; Illés, Á; Jacobasch, L; Laubach, JP; Lech-Maranda, E; Lonial, S; Maison-Blanche, P; Mariz, M; Moreau, P; Polprasert, C; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; San-Miguel, JF; Schjesvold, F; Shelekhova, T; Spencer, A; Spicka, I; Sureda, A; Wróbel, T, 2021
)
1.07
" Though peripheral sensory neuropathy was more frequent with twice weekly dosing (P = ."( Outcomes with different administration schedules of bortezomib in bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) as first-line therapy in multiple myeloma.
Buadi, F; Cook, J; Dingli, D; Dispenzieri, A; Fonder, A; Gertz, MA; Go, R; Gonsalves, W; Hayman, S; Higgins, A; Hobbs, M; Hwa, YL; Johnson, I; Kapoor, P; Kourelis, T; Kumar, S; Kyle, R; Lacy, M; Leung, N; Rajkumar, VS; Sidana, S; Warsame, R, 2021
)
0.87
" Severe neutropenia during her 1st cycle prompted a dosage reduction of lenalidomide and bortezomib."( [Cooccurrence of classic Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma].
Andoh, S; Imai, Y; Kawamata, T; Makiyama, J; Ota, Y; Tojo, A; Uchida, S; Yasui, H; Yokoyama, K, 2021
)
0.84
" The model can be potentially applied to evaluate their combination regimens and explore in vivo dosing regimens."( Network-Based Systems Analysis Explains Sequence-Dependent Synergism of Bortezomib and Vorinostat in Multiple Myeloma.
Mager, DE; Nanavati, C, 2021
)
0.85
" Thus, it is important to consider the dosage and timing of dexamethasone introduction on a patient-severity basis."( Dexamethasone is associated with early deaths in light chain amyloidosis patients with severe cardiac involvement.
Agbulut, O; Audard, V; Bézard, M; Damy, T; Galat, A; Gilles, F; Guendouz, S; Hamon, D; Kharoubi, M; Kordeli, E; Le Bras, F; Lemonnier, F; Molinier-Frenkel, V; Oghina, S; Poullot, E; Shourick, J; Teiger, E; Vitiello, D; Zaroui, A, 2021
)
0.62
"GBM cells proliferation speed is inversely proportional to the irradiation dose and recedes when the dosage is increased, as expected."( Effectiveness of bortezomib and temozolomide for eradication of recurrent human glioblastoma cells, resistant to radiation.
Bryukhovetskiy, I; Pak, O; Sharma, A; Sharma, HS; Shevchenko, V; Zaitsev, S, 2021
)
0.96
" Therefore, we investigated whether LEN-induced skin rash is affected by the duration of BOR administration and the dosing interval between BOR and LEN administration."( Preceding bortezomib administration for a certain period reduces the risk of lenalidomide-induced skin rash.
Hagihara, M; Hanai, H; Inoue, M; Kubo, K; Kushi, R; Mita, M; Ohara, S; Sugi, T; Uchida, T; Yasu, T, 2022
)
1.12
" In routine clinical care, PanBorDex is used primarily in later relapses and is commonly administered in attenuated dosing schedules to mitigate the treatment-related toxicity."( Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in multiply relapsed and refractory myeloma; UK routine care cohort.
Basu, S; Bhatti, Z; Collings, F; Karim, F; Kishore, B; Kothari, J; Leary, H; Maouche, N; Ramasamy, K; Reddy, U; Ryman, N; Sundararaman, S; Tseu, B; Vallance, GD, 2022
)
1
"DARA SC 1800 mg was administered every 4 weeks, per approved dosing schedules."( Switching to daratumumab SC from IV is safe and preferred by patients with multiple myeloma.
Basu, S; Beksac, M; Carson, R; Cook, G; Delioukina, M; Gries, KS; Kudva, A; Mateos, MV; Pei, H; Rigaudeau, S; Schots, R; Spicka, I; Tromp, B; Van Rampelbergh, R; White, D; Wrobel, T; Wroblewski, S, 2023
)
0.91
" Further studies need to be conducted to understand the impact of dosing strategies of anti-MM agents in the real world."( Real-world data on lenalidomide dosing and outcomes in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma: Results from the Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database.
Aslam, M; Gul, E; Jimenez-Zepeda, VH; Kardjadj, M; Kotb, R; LeBlanc, R; Louzada, M; Masih-Khan, E; McCurdy, A; Mian, H; Reece, D; Reiman, A; Sebag, M; Song, K; Stakiw, J; Venner, CP; White, D, 2023
)
0.91
" This exposure system allows the possibility of creating dose-response curves resulting in the generation of more reliable cell-based assay data for many types of applications, such as safety analysis."( Development and Characterization of a 96-Well Exposure System for Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials.
Arz, MI; Briesen, H; Dähnhardt-Pfeiffer, S; Drexel, R; Fink, M; Fürtauer, S; Herrmann, C; Hornberger, R; Kohl, Y; Krebs, T; Mamier, M; Meier, F; Metzger, C; Müller, M; Sängerlaub, S; Wagner, S, 2023
)
0.91
" Variability in patient baseline characteristics, such as the number of prior lines of treatment, refractoriness to prior treatments, prior stem cell transplant, and timing and dosing of prior lenalidomide, makes it difficult to select the best options for patients with RRMM for whom first-line treatments have failed."( Clinical evidence for immune-based strategies in early-line multiple myeloma: current challenges in decision-making for subsequent therapy.
Iida, S; Mateos, MV; Raje, N; Reece, D, 2023
)
0.91
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (4)

RoleDescription
antineoplastic agentA substance that inhibits or prevents the proliferation of neoplasms.
proteasome inhibitorA drug that blocks the action of proteasomes, cellular complexes that break down proteins.
protease inhibitorA compound which inhibits or antagonizes the biosynthesis or actions of proteases (endopeptidases).
antiprotozoal drugAny antimicrobial drug which is used to treat or prevent protozoal infections.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (3)

ClassDescription
amino acid amideAn amide of an amino acid formed formally by conversion of the carboxy group to a carboxamido group.
pyrazines
L-phenylalanine derivativeA proteinogenic amino acid derivative resulting from reaction of L-phenylalanine at the amino group or the carboxy group, or from the replacement of any hydrogen of L-phenylalanine by a heteroatom.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (119)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency0.03860.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521; AID1159523
Fumarate hydrataseHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.03320.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
PPM1D proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.04150.00529.466132.9993AID1347411
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.00920.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.82030.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259243; AID1259247; AID743035; AID743036; AID743042; AID743054; AID743063
caspase 7, apoptosis-related cysteine proteaseHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.21130.013326.981070.7614AID1346978
estrogen receptor 2 (ER beta)Homo sapiens (human)Potency1.50920.000657.913322,387.1992AID1259377; AID1259378
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.11110.001022.650876.6163AID1224838; AID1224839; AID1224893
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.94390.000417.946075.1148AID1346795
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.88490.01237.983543.2770AID1346984; AID1645841
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.03220.001310.157742.8575AID1259252; AID1259253; AID1259255; AID1259256
glucocorticoid receptor [Homo sapiens]Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.01270.000214.376460.0339AID720691; AID720692
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.00940.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159553
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.06680.000817.505159.3239AID1159527; AID1159531
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.01940.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224841; AID1224842; AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259401; AID1259403
farnesoid X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency6.04930.375827.485161.6524AID743217; AID743220
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.00840.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346982
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.13260.000229.305416,493.5996AID1259244; AID1259248; AID743069; AID743075; AID743077; AID743078; AID743079; AID743080; AID743091
polyproteinZika virusPotency0.03320.00308.794948.0869AID1347053
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor deltaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.26840.001024.504861.6448AID743212; AID743215; AID743227
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.04720.001019.414170.9645AID743094; AID743140; AID743191
vitamin D (1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency1.87380.023723.228263.5986AID743222; AID743223; AID743241
caspase-3Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.21130.013326.981070.7614AID1346978
cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily A, polypeptide 1, isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.01800.001723.839378.1014AID743083
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.01060.10009.191631.6228AID1346983
Histone H2A.xCricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster)Potency15.55650.039147.5451146.8240AID1224845
Caspase-7Cricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster)Potency0.00670.006723.496068.5896AID1346980
caspase-3Cricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster)Potency0.00670.006723.496068.5896AID1346980
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.02500.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743066; AID743067
heat shock protein beta-1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.28810.042027.378961.6448AID743210; AID743228
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.02160.000627.21521,122.0200AID743202; AID743219
Voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-2 subunitMus musculus (house mouse)Potency0.05960.001557.789015,848.9004AID1259244
Interferon betaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.04970.00339.158239.8107AID1347407; AID1347411
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.01250.002319.595674.0614AID651631; AID720552
Glutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.05960.001551.739315,848.9004AID1259244
ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.02040.011917.942071.5630AID651632; AID720516
Ataxin-2Homo sapiens (human)Potency0.01990.011912.222168.7989AID651632
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Chain H, Proteasome component PUP1Saccharomyces cerevisiae (brewer's yeast)Ki0.00060.00060.00060.0006AID977610
Chain I, Proteasome component PUP3Saccharomyces cerevisiae (brewer's yeast)Ki0.00060.00060.00060.0006AID977610
Chain K, Proteasome component PRE2Saccharomyces cerevisiae (brewer's yeast)Ki0.00060.00060.00060.0006AID977610
Chain L, Proteasome component C5Saccharomyces cerevisiae (brewer's yeast)Ki0.00060.00060.00060.0006AID977610
Chain K, Proteasome component PRE2Saccharomyces cerevisiae (brewer's yeast)Ki0.00060.00060.00060.0006AID977610
Chain L, Proteasome component C5Saccharomyces cerevisiae (brewer's yeast)Ki0.00060.00060.00060.0006AID977610
Proteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00701.09812.5000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Proteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
Histone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.18000.00040.619610.0000AID1689693
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Carbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)Ki5.87000.00021.10439.9000AID1460773
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
ProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)Ki13.00000.00000.78469.0000AID211777
Chymotrypsinogen ABos taurus (cattle)Ki2.40000.90004.00008.7000AID1156346
Carbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)Ki1.29000.00001.372610.0000AID1312152; AID1460764
Carbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)Ki1.16000.00000.72369.9200AID1312153; AID1460765
Carbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)Ki4.57000.00022.010210.0000AID1460766
Cathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)30.00000.00021.845310.0000AID1128237
Neutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)Ki2.30000.00201.28669.5499AID66813
Cathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.81000.01372.42247.4130AID1128238; AID316535
Cathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.63000.63000.63000.6300AID48219
Lysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)9.20000.60006.600010.0000AID1128236
Chymotrypsinogen BHomo sapiens (human)Ki0.32000.32004.41008.5000AID52603
26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.08500.00011.97318.0000AID1762748
Proteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.21490.00060.73766.3700AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1382145; AID1382148; AID1396602; AID1459657; AID1486824; AID1604182; AID1613999; AID1624025; AID1687105; AID1764783; AID1864398; AID1903224; AID706736; AID734753
Carbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)Ki6.51000.00021.97209.9200AID1460767
Carbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)Ki4.38000.00011.47109.9200AID1460770
ChymaseHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.19000.02602.639710.0000AID316541
Proteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
Proteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
Proteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
Proteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
Proteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.16810.00130.36985.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1128235; AID1141825; AID1604187; AID1614003; AID1624025; AID1624027; AID1687110; AID1764783; AID1895437; AID1903224; AID354000
Proteasome subunit beta type-8Mus musculus (house mouse)IC50 (µMol)0.01680.01680.05740.0980AID1325773
Proteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.20590.00100.76115.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1604183; AID1614001; AID1624025; AID1687108; AID1764783; AID1895435; AID1903224
Proteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
Proteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
Proteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.28420.00130.69125.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1895438; AID1903224
Proteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)15,084.28360.00050.939410.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1128234; AID1141825; AID1291318; AID1291322; AID1295429; AID1301231; AID1363797; AID1363798; AID1363799; AID1382147; AID1382150; AID1396601; AID1439183; AID1459637; AID1484607; AID1486822; AID1496304; AID1604186; AID1613994; AID1624025; AID1624026; AID1687107; AID1764783; AID1800498; AID1864383; AID1895440; AID1903224; AID706738; AID734754
Proteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)Ki0.00670.00060.01040.0700AID1128512; AID1156343; AID750162
Carbonic anhydrase 5A, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)Ki6.92000.00001.27259.9000AID1460768
26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Lon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.18300.18300.18300.1830AID1764782
Proteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53590.00130.81515.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1604185; AID1624025; AID1687109; AID1764783; AID1895436; AID1903224
Carbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)Ki6.94000.00021.37379.9000AID1460771
26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Proteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
Proteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)2.98600.00131.39067.9540AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1382146; AID1382149; AID1396603; AID1459656; AID1486823; AID1604184; AID1614000; AID1624025; AID1624028; AID1687106; AID1764783; AID1864397; AID1903224; AID706737; AID734752
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
26S proteasome complex subunit SEM1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Proteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Beta-carbonic anhydrase 1Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RvKi7.30000.00483.38419.8400AID1312159
Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.08500.00011.80888.0000AID1762748
Transcription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.08500.00011.89818.8000AID1762748
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Histone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.62000.00010.55439.9000AID1689691
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Proteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Carbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)Ki3.38000.00010.78749.9000AID1460772
ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunitStaphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus NCTC 8325IC50 (µMol)5.30005.30005.30005.3000AID1605096
Carbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)Ki8.45000.00031.23099.8000AID1460774
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 Mus musculus (house mouse)IC50 (µMol)0.04070.00041.441910.0000AID1864382
Proteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.32130.00130.70995.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1903224
Histone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.80000.00010.72219.9700AID1689692
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
Proteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)1.87720.00130.68435.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825; AID1624025; AID1764783; AID1895439; AID1903224
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Carbonic anhydrase 15Mus musculus (house mouse)Ki2.68000.00091.884610.0000AID1460776
Histone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.07200.00070.99479.9000AID1689694
Histone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)69.44000.00000.53769.9000AID1689695
Carbonic anhydrase 14Homo sapiens (human)Ki3.28000.00021.50999.9000AID1460775
26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)0.53350.00700.71182.0000AID1128229; AID1128230; AID1128231; AID1141825
Carbonic anhydrase 5B, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)Ki6.83000.00001.34129.9700AID1460769
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunitStaphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus NCTC 8325EC50 (µMol)23.50003.60003.60003.6000AID1605098
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Other Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Proteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)Ki500.02500.02000.86002.0700AID1372745; AID1372748
Proteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)Ki500.01000.01000.17250.5600AID1372744; AID1372747
Proteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)Ki501.07500.78001.15001.3700AID1372746; AID1372749
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (567)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
proteolysisProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell differentiationProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome assembly26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell differentiation26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repair via homologous recombination26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repair via nonhomologous end joining26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
response to ethanol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of proteasomal protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
protein K63-linked deubiquitination26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
protein deubiquitination26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of myotube differentiationHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
establishment of mitotic spindle orientationHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein phosphorylationHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin organizationHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein deacetylationHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycleHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein ubiquitinationHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein stabilityHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of TOR signalingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
circadian regulation of gene expressionHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of multicellular organism growthHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein import into nucleusHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of circadian rhythmHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of JNK cascadeHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
spindle assemblyHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
establishment of skin barrierHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to fluid shear stressHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cold-induced thermogenesisHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
DNA repair-dependent chromatin remodelingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
cornified envelope assemblyHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cardiac muscle cell differentiationHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
epigenetic regulation of gene expressionHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
estrous cycleCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
chloride ion homeostasisCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein phosphorylationProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysisProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
acute-phase responseProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
blood coagulationProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell shapeProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
response to woundingProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of platelet activationProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
platelet activationProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of blood coagulationProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of blood coagulationProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell growthProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of insulin secretionProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of collagen biosynthetic processProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
fibrinolysisProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of astrocyte differentiationProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosolProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentrationProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
cytolysis by host of symbiont cellsProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B signal transductionProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibrinolysisProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
antimicrobial humoral immune response mediated by antimicrobial peptideProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
neutrophil-mediated killing of gram-negative bacteriumProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lipid kinase activityProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cytokine production involved in inflammatory responseProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of protein localization to nucleusProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of phospholipase C-activating G protein-coupled receptor signaling pathwayProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
ligand-gated ion channel signaling pathwayProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
digestionChymotrypsinogen ABos taurus (cattle)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)
morphogenesis of an epitheliumCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular pH reductionCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
angiotensin-activated signaling pathwayCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of monoatomic anion transportCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
secretionCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intracellular pHCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dipeptide transmembrane transportCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chloride transportCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
carbon dioxide transportCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STATInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of autophagyInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylation of STAT proteinInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interferon-betaInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell proliferationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of viral genome replicationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of innate immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of MHC class I biosynthetic processInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon-mediated signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of Lewy body formationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T-helper 2 cell cytokine productionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic signaling pathwayInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
response to exogenous dsRNAInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
B cell differentiationInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
natural killer cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
adaptive immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
T cell activation involved in immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to bacteriumCarbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
thyroid hormone generationCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
collagen catabolic processCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
epithelial cell differentiationCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
decidualizationCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
symbiont entry into host cellCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysis involved in protein catabolic processCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to thyroid hormone stimulusCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysisNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
response to yeastNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
leukocyte migration involved in inflammatory responseNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
biosynthetic process of antibacterial peptides active against Gram-negative bacteriaNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysisNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular calcium ion homeostasisNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
response to UVNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix disassemblyNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein catabolic processNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of chemokine productionNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of interleukin-8 productionNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-8 productionNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to bacteriumNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of MAP kinase activityNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory responseNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of immune responseNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of chemotaxisNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
pyroptosisNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
neutrophil-mediated killing of gram-negative bacteriumNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
neutrophil-mediated killing of fungusNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of leukocyte tethering or rollingNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
phagocytosisNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
acute inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysisCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
angiotensin maturationCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
monocyte chemotaxisCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysisCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
immune responseCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
protein processingCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
protein metabolic processCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
antibacterial humoral responseCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix disassemblyCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
platelet activationCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
purinergic nucleotide receptor signaling pathwayCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
neutrophil activationCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of immune responseCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to Gram-negative bacteriumCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to Gram-positive bacteriumCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
defense response to fungusCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of T cell activationCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
neutrophil-mediated killing of gram-positive bacteriumCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
biofilm matrix disassemblyCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of platelet aggregationCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysisLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular protein transportLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein stabilityLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of chaperone-mediated autophagyLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of chaperone-mediated autophagyLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
digestionChymotrypsinogen BHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysisChymotrypsinogen BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
modulation by host of viral transcription26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of proteasomal protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
JNK cascadeNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of macrophage derived foam cell differentiationNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of lipid storageNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of calcidiol 1-monooxygenase activityNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of vitamin D biosynthetic processNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cholesterol transportNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of interleukin-12 productionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
response to muscle stretchNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
non-canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory responseNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
B cell receptor signaling pathwayNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein metabolic processNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
mammary gland involutionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription initiation by RNA polymerase IINuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to mechanical stimulusNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to nicotineNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interleukin-1Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interleukin-6Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to tumor necrosis factorNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to dsRNANuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical Wnt signaling pathwayNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interleukin-17Nuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to virusNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
antibacterial innate immune responseNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of hyaluronan biosynthetic processNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to angiotensinNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA metabolic processNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to stressNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
response to cytokineNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysis involved in protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
bicarbonate transportCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
detection of chemical stimulus involved in sensory perception of bitter tasteCarbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)
angiotensin maturationChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
peptide metabolic processChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix disassemblyChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein catabolic processChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
midbrain developmentChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
basement membrane disassemblyChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of angiogenesisChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose stimulusChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine precursor processingChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
immune system processProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
response to virusProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
antigen processing and presentationProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
fat cell differentiationProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
immune system processProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cysteine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of inflammatory response to antigenic stimulusProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysisProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 5A, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
osteoblast differentiation26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of proteasomal protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial genome maintenanceLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrion organizationLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein catabolic processLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA metabolic processLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to oxidative stressLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial protein catabolic processLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of insulin receptor signaling pathwayLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysis involved in protein catabolic processLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
oxidation-dependent protein catabolic processLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein quality control for misfolded or incompletely synthesized proteinsLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
chaperone-mediated protein complex assemblyLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
cell morphogenesisProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
humoral immune responseProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferationProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, GABAergicCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular pH reductionCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
neuron cellular homeostasisCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of chloride transportCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intracellular pHCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
blastocyst development26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
proteolysis26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of proteasomal protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
response to organonitrogen compoundProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteolysis involved in protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of proteasomal protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of programmed cell death26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcription26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcription26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of proteasomal protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of inclusion body assembly26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of proteasomal protein catabolic process26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
ERAD pathway26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assembly26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
follicular dendritic cell differentiationNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
germinal center formationNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular matrix organizationNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IINuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
rhythmic processNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
spleen developmentNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to stressNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
non-canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
response to cytokineNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-1 beta productionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-6 productionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-8 productionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of amyloid-beta formationTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2 signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IITranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
liver developmentTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
hair follicle developmentTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
defense response to tumor cellTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
acetaldehyde metabolic processTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin organizationTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-templated transcriptionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IITranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
inflammatory responseTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular defense responseTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
neuropeptide signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
animal organ morphogenesisTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to UV-BTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor productionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of Schwann cell differentiationTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of angiogenesisTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cytokine-mediated signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
protein catabolic processTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to muramyl dipeptideTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to progesteroneTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-12 productionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-6 productionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-8 productionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to insulinTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein sumoylationTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to cobalaminTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
toll-like receptor 4 signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular signal transductionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hepatocyte growth factor stimulusTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to muscle stretchTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
non-canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
prolactin signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein catabolic processTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to amino acidTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IITranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of insulin receptor signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of inflammatory responseTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T cell receptor signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activityTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to cAMPTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
defense response to virusTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hydrogen peroxideTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
interleukin-1-mediated signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to interleukin-1Transcription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipoteichoic acidTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to peptidoglycanTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to nicotineTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interleukin-1Transcription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to interleukin-6Transcription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to tumor necrosis factorTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapse to nucleus signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
antiviral innate immune responseTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of non-canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of non-canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA transcriptionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to angiotensinTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelial cellTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA metabolic processTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to stressTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
response to cytokineTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
innate immune responseTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of myotube differentiationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of signaling receptor activityHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin organizationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin remodelingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA methylation-dependent heterochromatin formationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein deacetylationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
endoderm developmentHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal cell differentiationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
hippocampus developmentHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
neuron differentiationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell migrationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
circadian regulation of gene expressionHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to platelet-derived growth factor stimulusHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
odontogenesis of dentin-containing toothHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell fate specificationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic digit morphogenesisHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of canonical NF-kappaB signal transductionHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation by host of viral transcriptionHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expression, epigeneticHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte differentiationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of androgen receptor signaling pathwayHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
hair follicle placode formationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
eyelid development in camera-type eyeHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
fungiform papilla formationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of canonical Wnt signaling pathwayHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell population maintenanceHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of stem cell population maintenanceHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of stem cell differentiationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
heterochromatin formationHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
transcription elongation by RNA polymerase IIProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome assemblyProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
response to hypoxiaCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
morphogenesis of an epitheliumCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
response to testosteroneCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
secretionCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)
spermatogenesisProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasomal protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
meiotic cell cycleProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of meiosis IProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of signaling receptor activityHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle hypertrophyHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin remodelingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to xenobiotic stimulusHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal cell differentiationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transitionHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by competitive promoter bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuron projection developmentHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
dendrite developmentHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell migrationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to caffeineHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
heterochromatin formationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to lipopolysaccharideHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-1 productionHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tumor necrosis factor productionHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
circadian regulation of gene expressionHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of collagen biosynthetic processHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to heatHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to nicotineHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein modification processHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to cocaineHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
odontogenesis of dentin-containing toothHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT proteinHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell fate specificationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic digit morphogenesisHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-binding transcription factor activityHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of MHC class II biosynthetic processHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of proteolysisHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
behavioral response to ethanolHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to hyperoxiaHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
hair follicle placode formationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of dendritic spine developmentHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
eyelid development in camera-type eyeHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
fungiform papilla formationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hydrogen peroxideHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to retinoic acidHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulusHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of male mating behaviorHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell population maintenanceHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of stem cell population maintenanceHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to dopamineHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
response to amyloid-betaHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of stem cell differentiationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of peptidyl-lysine acetylationHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell population proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of B cell proliferationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction in response to DNA damageATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
isotype switchingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA replicationATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of isotype switching to IgG isotypesATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloadingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic processProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of receptor internalizationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of translationAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA metabolic processAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-body assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
stress granule assemblyAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA transportAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin organizationHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic sister chromatid cohesionHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein ubiquitinationHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein stabilityHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of telomere maintenanceHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
epigenetic regulation of gene expressionHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
polyamine deacetylationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
spermidine deacetylationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of signaling receptor activityHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
protein polyubiquitinationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
response to amphetamineHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
protein deacetylationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
protein quality control for misfolded or incompletely synthesized proteinsHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular protein transportHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
actin filament organizationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of microtubule depolymerizationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of autophagyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of epithelial cell migrationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of hydrogen peroxide metabolic processHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of macroautophagyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
axonal transport of mitochondrionHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein-containing complex assemblyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of protein stabilityHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
protein destabilizationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
lysosome localizationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex disassemblyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-serine phosphorylationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to heatHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
peptidyl-lysine deacetylationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
response to immobilization stressHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to topologically incorrect proteinHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
erythrocyte enucleationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process via the multivesicular body sorting pathwayHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein-containing complex disassemblyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fat cell differentiationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expression, epigeneticHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
collateral sproutingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of axon extension involved in axon guidanceHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of dendrite morphogenesisHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of oxidoreductase activityHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
response to corticosteroneHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
response to misfolded proteinHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of synaptic transmission, glutamatergicHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of microtubule-based movementHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of androgen receptor signaling pathwayHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
dendritic spine morphogenesisHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cilium disassemblyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
parkin-mediated stimulation of mitophagy in response to mitochondrial depolarizationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of establishment of protein localizationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hydrogen peroxideHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
aggresome assemblyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
polyubiquitinated misfolded protein transportHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
response to growth factorHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to misfolded proteinHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to parathyroid hormone stimulusHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
response to dexamethasoneHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
tubulin deacetylationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of tubulin deacetylationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular response to oxidative stressHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of protein acetylationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of autophagy of mitochondrionHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cholangiocyte proliferationHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of aggrephagyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
epigenetic regulation of gene expressionHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 14Homo sapiens (human)
meiosis I26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
response to bacteriumCarbonic anhydrase 5B, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
one-carbon metabolic processCarbonic anhydrase 5B, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (159)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
structural molecule activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
metallopeptidase activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activator activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
K63-linked deubiquitinase activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
metal-dependent deubiquitinase activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor bindingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor activityHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
cyclin bindingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin DNA bindingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein lysine deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
NF-kappaB bindingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor bindingHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein decrotonylase activityHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
histone decrotonylase activityHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein de-2-hydroxyisobutyrylase activityHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme regulator activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide bindingProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase activityProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
calcium ion bindingProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
growth factor activityProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
heparin bindingProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
thrombospondin receptor activityProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingChymotrypsinogen ABos taurus (cattle)
serpin family protein bindingChymotrypsinogen ABos taurus (cattle)
arylesterase activityCarbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCarbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)
hydro-lyase activityCarbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cyanamide hydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)
arylesterase activityCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cyanamide hydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytokine activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
type I interferon receptor bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase activityInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCarbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)
nickel cation bindingCarbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type endopeptidase activityCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
collagen bindingCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
cysteine-type peptidase activityCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
proteoglycan bindingCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
protease bindingNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor activityNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase activityNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
heparin bindingNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytokine bindingNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase activityCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
heparin bindingCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type peptidase activityCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
receptor ligand activityCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
caspase bindingCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
carboxypeptidase activityLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type carboxypeptidase activityLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme activator activityLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase activityChymotrypsinogen BHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
ATP binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome-activating activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coregulator activityNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
actinin bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase activityChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type peptidase activityChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
peptide bindingChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
lipopolysaccharide bindingProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cadherin bindingProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 5A, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 5A, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
ATP binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-activating activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
single-stranded RNA bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent peptidase activityLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
serine-type endopeptidase activityLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
PH domain bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
ADP bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
insulin receptor substrate bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific DNA bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
G-quadruplex DNA bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
DNA polymerase bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
single-stranded DNA bindingLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
ATP binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome-activating activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
peptidase activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
metal-dependent deubiquitinase activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
RNA binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
molecular adaptor activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
polyubiquitin modification-dependent protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
purine ribonucleoside triphosphate bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
NF-kappaB bindingProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
RNA binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-activating activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
ATP binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
transcription factor binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome-activating activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
ATP binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
protein-macromolecule adaptor activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome-activating activity26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
identical protein binding26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
protein kinase bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin DNA bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
peptide bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
phosphate ion bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
protein homodimerization activityTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
actinin bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
NF-kappaB bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
ankyrin repeat bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor bindingTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme regulator activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleosomal DNA bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor activityHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein lysine deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
Krueppel-associated box domain bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
NF-kappaB bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
E-box bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
histone decrotonylase activityHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activator activityProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome bindingProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function inhibitor activityProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCarbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)
nucleosomal DNA bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
heat shock protein bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein lysine deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
histone bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
NF-kappaB bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
histone decrotonylase activityHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein de-2-hydroxyisobutyrylase activityHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA clamp unloader activityATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
threonine-type endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
endopeptidase activityProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
protein binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme regulator activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase binding26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
RNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
epidermal growth factor receptor bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA bindingAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
Hsp70 protein bindingHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
protein lysine deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
metal ion bindingHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
Hsp90 protein bindingHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor bindingHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
histone decrotonylase activityHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
acetylspermidine deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
transcription corepressor bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
actin bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
beta-catenin bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
microtubule bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
polyubiquitin modification-dependent protein bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
protein lysine deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
tubulin deacetylase activityHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
alpha-tubulin bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
tau protein bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
beta-tubulin bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
misfolded protein bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
Hsp90 protein bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
dynein complex bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
transcription factor bindingHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 14Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 14Homo sapiens (human)
structural molecule activity26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
carbonate dehydratase activityCarbonic anhydrase 5B, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCarbonic anhydrase 5B, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (115)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, lid subcomplex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 11Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosome26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, lid subcomplex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 12Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, lid subcomplex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolic proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 14Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
postsynapseProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic spindleHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase complexHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone deacetylase 3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosome26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, lid subcomplex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 3Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
membraneCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 12Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum lumenProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi lumenProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
blood microparticleProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceProthrombinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionChymotrypsinogen ABos taurus (cattle)
serine protease inhibitor complexChymotrypsinogen ABos taurus (cattle)
cytosolCarbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCarbonic anhydrase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
myelin sheathCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
apical part of cellCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
apical part of cellCarbonic anhydrase 2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionInterferon betaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCarbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCarbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 3Homo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomeCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
endolysosome lumenCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
melanosomeCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
peptidase inhibitor complexCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomeCathepsin BHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
secretory granuleNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
azurophil granule lumenNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
specific granule lumenNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
phagocytic vesicleNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceNeutrophil elastaseHomo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomeCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
membraneCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
secretory granuleCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
azurophil granule lumenCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCathepsin GHomo sapiens (human)
lumenal side of lysosomal membraneLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomeLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
membraneLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
azurophil granule lumenLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
lysosomal lumenLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeLysosomal protective proteinHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionChymotrypsinogen BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
P-body26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, base subcomplex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6AHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGlutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
extracellular regionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumenNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
specific granule lumenNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
I-kappaB/NF-kappaB complexNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
NF-kappaB p50/p65 complexNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p105 subunitHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumenProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-1Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
rough endoplasmic reticulumCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartmentCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport vesicle membraneCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule membraneCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
brush border membraneCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionCarbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceCarbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCarbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeCarbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceCarbonic anhydrase 6Homo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
secretory granuleChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein granuleChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
collagen-containing extracellular matrixChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular spaceChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmChymaseHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
P-bodyProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumenProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
synapseProteasome subunit alpha type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
P-bodyProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
spermatoproteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-8Mus musculus (house mouse)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-8Mus musculus (house mouse)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
spermatoproteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-9Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumenProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
ciliary basal bodyProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-5Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCarbonic anhydrase 5A, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCarbonic anhydrase 5A, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 5A, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCarbonic anhydrase 5A, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
P-body26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasm26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein granule26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, base subcomplex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
membraneLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial nucleoidLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixLon protease homolog, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
spermatoproteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-10Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
inclusion body26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
synapse26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolic proteasome complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, base subcomplex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 6BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, lid subcomplex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosome26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, base subcomplex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome complex subunit SEM1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome complex subunit SEM1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
P-bodyProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
ribosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
myofibrilProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
sarcomereProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha type-6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, base subcomplex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasm26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic vesicle26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosome26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
blood microparticle26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, base subcomplex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
inclusion body26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosome26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolic proteasome complex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, base subcomplex26S proteasome regulatory subunit 10BHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
Bcl3/NF-kappaB2 complexNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusNuclear factor NF-kappa-B p100 subunit Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
glutamatergic synapseTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
NF-kappaB p50/p65 complexTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
NF-kappaB complexTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmTranscription factor p65Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosome26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome storage granule26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, base subcomplex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
NuRD complexHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
neuronal cell bodyHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
Sin3-type complexHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase complexHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
heterochromatinHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone deacetylase 1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 6Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, lid subcomplexProteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
membraneCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
microvillus membraneCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 9Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCarbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)
myelin sheathCarbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)
intracellular membrane-bounded organelleCarbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCarbonic anhydrase 13Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolNACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 Mus musculus (house mouse)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, alpha-subunit complexProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
spermatoproteasome complexProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit alpha-type 8Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome, telomeric regionHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
NuRD complexHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
Sin3-type complexHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase complexHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
ESC/E(Z) complexHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone deacetylase 2Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
Elg1 RFC-like complexATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 5Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complexProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular regionProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumenProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumenProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complexProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome core complex, beta-subunit complexProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolProteasome subunit beta type-7Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
azurophil granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, base subcomplex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome storage granule26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 1Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
trans-Golgi networkAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
membraneAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
ribonucleoprotein complexAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmic stress granuleAtaxin-2Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear chromosomeHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase complexHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone deacetylase 8Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
multivesicular bodyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
microtubuleHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
caveolaHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
inclusion bodyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
aggresomeHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
axonHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
dendriteHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
cell leading edgeHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
ciliary basal bodyHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
perikaryonHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
axon cytoplasmHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase complexHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
microtubule associated complexHistone deacetylase 6Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 14Homo sapiens (human)
membraneCarbonic anhydrase 14Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 14Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 14Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneCarbonic anhydrase 14Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
extracellular region26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasm26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
membrane26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
secretory granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
ficolin-1-rich granule lumen26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome accessory complex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
cytosol26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
proteasome regulatory particle, lid subcomplex26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
nucleus26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 13Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCarbonic anhydrase 5B, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCarbonic anhydrase 5B, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCarbonic anhydrase 5B, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCarbonic anhydrase 5B, mitochondrialHomo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (979)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1347139qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347141qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347136qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347159Primary screen GU Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347137qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for Daoy cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347138qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D caspase screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347140qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347135qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Orthogonal 3D viability screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347160Primary screen NINDS Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID686947qHTS for small molecule inhibitors of Yes1 kinase: Primary Screen2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-01, Volume: 23, Issue:15
Identification of potent Yes1 kinase inhibitors using a library screening approach.
AID706484Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human THP1 cells at 30 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID316573Inhibition of human TACE at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1396603Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID1156396Growth inhibition of human OVCAR5 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID661296Inhibition of rabbit 20S proteasome activity at 10 uM after 30 mins2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-08, Volume: 55, Issue:5
Discovery and synthesis of hydronaphthoquinones as novel proteasome inhibitors.
AID1604187Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 5i (unknown origin) after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID1197979Inhibition of USP18 (unknown origin) expressed in human A549 cells coexpressing ISG15-GFP assessed as reduction in free GFP at 25 to 100 uM after 24 hrs by immunoblot assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 58, Issue:4
Synthesis, characterization, and optimization for in vivo delivery of a nonselective isopeptidase inhibitor as new antineoplastic agent.
AID706487Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human SW1573 cells at 30 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1687103Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum 20S proteasome beta 5 subunit chymotrypsin-like activity using fluorogenic peptide Ac-WLA-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha incubated for 1 to 2 hrs by fluorescence microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1312156Inhibition of Cryptococcus neoformans beta-carbonic anhydrase preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID1506374Antiproliferative activity against human multiple myeloma cancer stem cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017MedChemComm, Jan-01, Volume: 8, Issue:1
Withaferin A induces cell death and differentiation in multiple myeloma cancer stem cells.
AID497570Inhibition of trypsin like proteolytic activity of rabbit 26S proteasome2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 18, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological evaluation of naphthoquinone analogs as a novel class of proteasome inhibitors.
AID397960Cytotoxicity against human U266 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID496353Induction of IL-5 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1156370Growth inhibition of human NCI-H522 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID316538Inhibition of human cathepsin S at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1687104Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum 20S proteasome beta 1 subunit caspase-like activity using fluorogenic peptide Ac-nLPnLD-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha incubated for 1 to 2 hrs by fluorescence microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1667214Inhibition of human SET7 overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells at 25 uM preincubated for 15 mins followed by addition of SAM as substrate and biotinylated Histone H3 (1-50) peptide measured after 30 mins by AlphaLISA assay relative to control2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-01, Volume: 28, Issue:7
Computational discovery and biological evaluation of novel inhibitors targeting histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SET7.
AID1459659Apparent volume of distribution in Sprague-Dawley rat at 0.8 mg/kg, iv administered as bolus2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1576794Cytotoxicity against anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated human CD4-positive T cells with CRISP/CAS9 20S proteasome beta 5c knockout assessed as reduction in cell viability measured on day 8 by CellTiter Glo assay relative to control2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID211777Inhibitory activity against thrombin1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-17, Volume: 8, Issue:4
Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: dipeptidyl boronic acids.
AID1128235Inhibition of beta5i subunit of immunoproteasome (unknown origin) by active-site ELISA2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID1624028Inhibition of human 20s proteasome subunit beta2 caspase-like activity using Z-LLE-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID1674999Antiinflammatory activity against mouse RAW264.7 cells assessed as inhibition of TNFalpha-stimulated NF-kappaB activation by luciferase assay2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 30, Issue:17
Synthesis and evaluation of 1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives as potential anti-inflammatory agents by inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells.
AID1459655Toxicity in human Bel7404 cells xenografted BALB/c mouse assessed as mortality at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 20 and 24 during compound dosing2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID496363Induction of IFN-gamma gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID706501Effect on PSMB5 mRNA expression in human Jurkat-B cells expressing PSMB5 C323T mutant at 1000 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID316516Half life in CD1 mouse at 0.8 mg/kg, iv2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1156384Growth inhibition of human LOXIMVI cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1295429Inhibition of chymotrypsin like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured after 1 hr by spectrofluorimetric analysis2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
3D-QSAR-aided design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors and mechanism studies.
AID516392Inhibition of trypsin like activity of partially purified human proteasome2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 20, Issue:19
Structure-activity relationship of boronic acid derivatives of tyropeptin: proteasome inhibitors.
AID1252357Antiproliferative activity against human CCRF-CEM cells after 72 hrs by oxyluciferin luminescence assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 25, Issue:21
Structure-activity relationship study of syringolin A as a potential anticancer agent.
AID548702Cytotoxicity against human SKOV3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID397956Cytotoxicity against human KB cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID516389Cytotoxicity against human RPMI8226 cells2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 20, Issue:19
Structure-activity relationship of boronic acid derivatives of tyropeptin: proteasome inhibitors.
AID706506Effect on PSMB5 mRNA expression in human THP1 cells at 30 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1674412Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of Leishmania tarentolae proteasome beta 5 Y113F mutant2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-08, Volume: 63, Issue:19
Discovery and Characterization of Clinical Candidate LXE408 as a Kinetoplastid-Selective Proteasome Inhibitor for the Treatment of Leishmaniases.
AID1918919Antiproliferative activity against human RPMI-8226 cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation incubated for 72 hrs by XTT assay2022Journal of natural products, 12-23, Volume: 85, Issue:12
Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Compounds from
AID316553Inhibition of human MMP12 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID496347Induction of TNFbeta gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID496367Induction of IL-2 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID640522Cytotoxicity against human WM266.4 cells after 72 hrs by ATPlite assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 20, Issue:2
Semisynthetic neoboutomellerone derivatives as ubiquitin-proteasome pathway inhibitors.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1604185Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 2i (unknown origin) after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID1325790Inhibition of 26S proteasome in human MDA-MB-468 cells assessed as accumulation of high molecular weight polyubiquitin-conjugated proteins at 35 nM after 4 hrs by Western blot analysis
AID316567Inhibition of human thrombin at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1548290Induction of apoptosis in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as late apoptotic cells level at 200 nM incubated for 24 hrs by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining based FCAS analysis (Rvb = 0.38%)
AID316574Metabolic stability in mouse liver microsomes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID316540Inhibition of human chymase at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID611896Cytotoxicity against human HEK293 cells after 24 hrs by MTT assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13
Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors.
AID1623367Cell cycle arrest in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 3 nM after 48 hrs by propidium iodide/RNase staining based flow cytometric method2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID761482Cytotoxicity against wild type human THP1 cells assessed as cell viability at 0.5 uM after 72 hrs by MTS assay relative to vehicle-treated control2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-25, Volume: 56, Issue:14
Inhibition of the human proteasome by imidazoline scaffolds.
AID734744Induction of apoptosis in human HCT116 cells assessed as induction of PARP cleavage by Western blotting analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Potent proteasome inhibitors derived from the unnatural cis-cyclopropane isomer of Belactosin A: synthesis, biological activity, and mode of action.
AID1299914Inhibition of chymotrypsin (unknown origin) using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate at 100 uM by fluorometric assay2016ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-10, Volume: 7, Issue:3
Synthesis and Evaluation of Macrocyclic Peptide Aldehydes as Potent and Selective Inhibitors of the 20S Proteasome.
AID658060Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human liver 26S proteasome using Suc-LLVY-AMC substrate2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Serendipity in discovery of proteasome inhibitors.
AID1623366Cell cycle arrest in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as accumulation at G0/G1 phase at 3 nM after 48 hrs by propidium iodide/RNase staining based flow cytometric method2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID1128241Cell cycle arrest in human HCT116 cells assessed as accumulation at G2/M phase at 100 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 19.1%)2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID1548243Inhibition of human proteasome pre-incubated for 30 mins before Suc-LLVY-AMC substrate addition and measured after 120 mins by fluorescence based assay
AID599472Cell cycle arrest in human HeLa cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 0.1 uM after 24 hrs by flow cytometry (Rvb = 30 +/- 0.46%)2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 19, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological evaluation of boron peptide analogues of Belactosin C as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496324Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as serum HBeAg level at 5 mg/kg, iv single dose after 24 hrs by ELISA2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID516390Inhibition of chymotrypsin like activity of partially purified human proteasome2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 20, Issue:19
Structure-activity relationship of boronic acid derivatives of tyropeptin: proteasome inhibitors.
AID548705Cytotoxicity against human RPMI18226 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1325787Cytotoxicity against human LCL cells harboring wild type p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID1382150Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 26S proteasome using Suc-LLVY-MCA as substrate measured for 1 hr by fluorescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-25, Volume: 146Ridaifen-F conjugated with cell-penetrating peptides inhibits intracellular proteasome activities and induces drug-resistant cell death.
AID1459698Toxicity in human Bel7404 cells xenografted BALB/c mouse assessed as effect on body weight at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 17 of compound dosing (Rvb = 26.29 +/- 1.03 g)2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1687134Inhibition of human 20S constitutive proteasome beta 5 subunit assessed as inhibition of BMV037 probe labeling at 1 to 10 uM incubated for 1 hr by SDS-PAGE analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1459638Antiproliferative activity against human HepG2 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID459676Tmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID496335Induction of TGTP gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 24 hrs by RT- PCR2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID452104Cytotoxicity against human BxPC3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of tripeptide boronic acid proteasome inhibitors.
AID459681Volume of distribution in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1623397Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as late apoptotic cells at 3 nM after 48 hrs by Annexin-V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric method (Rvb = 0.21%)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID548707Cmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1604183Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 1i (unknown origin) after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID1548267Induction of cell cycle arrest in human KM3 cells assessed as reduction in cell cycle progression in S phase at 100 nM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry
AID526653Inhibition of proteasome2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-14, Volume: 53, Issue:19
Toward the development of innovative bifunctional agents to induce differentiation and to promote apoptosis in leukemia: clinical candidates and perspectives.
AID496366Induction of IL-2 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID661298Irreversible inhibition of rabbit 20S proteasome activity at 10 uM after 30 mins measured after 4 hrs of dialysis2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-08, Volume: 55, Issue:5
Discovery and synthesis of hydronaphthoquinones as novel proteasome inhibitors.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1459677Antitumor activity against human Bel7404 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 20 of compound dosing relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1548286Induction of apoptosis in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as late apoptotic cells level at 50 nM incubated for 24 hrs by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining based FCAS analysis (Rvb = 0.38%)
AID588211Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in humans2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1250152Cytotoxicity against human Glioma cells (HF2885) after 72 hrs by CelltiterGlo assay2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
High-Throughput Screening of Patient-Derived Cultures Reveals Potential for Precision Medicine in Glioblastoma.
AID1156393Growth inhibition of human IGROV1 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID588212Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1312155Inhibition of Candida glabrata beta-carbonic anhydrase preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID1576778Selectivity ratio, ratio of IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 5c (unknown origin) to IC50 for human 20S proteasome beta 1i2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID1128515Inhibition of bovine pancreatic alpha-chymotrypsin activity assessed as Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC substrate hydrolysis after 10 mins2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Identification of a new series of amides as non-covalent proteasome inhibitors.
AID496355Induction of IL-5 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID548700Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1404704Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells after 48 hrs by CellTiter-Glo assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154Enhanced antimalarial activity of plasmepsin V inhibitors by modification of the P
AID1439188Antiproliferative activity against human A2780 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel non-peptide boronic acid derivatives as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1363818Cytotoxicity against human PBMC after 72 hrs by CellTiter-Glo luminescent cell viability assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Discovery of the First-in-Class Dual Histone Deacetylase-Proteasome Inhibitor.
AID1156394Growth inhibition of human OVCAR3 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1156383Growth inhibition of human U251 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID734753Inhibition of caspase-like activity of human 20S proteasome beta 1 subunit using Ac-nLPnLD-AMC as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Potent proteasome inhibitors derived from the unnatural cis-cyclopropane isomer of Belactosin A: synthesis, biological activity, and mode of action.
AID496317Toxicity in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as serum alanine aminotransferase level liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Northern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1128236Inhibition of recombinant cathepsin A (unknown origin) using Mca-Arg-Pro-Pro-Gly-Phe-Ser-Ala-Phe-Lys(Dnp)-OH as substrate incubated with enzyme for 5 mins prior to substrate challenge for 2 hrs by spectrofluorometer analysis2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID1687106Inhibition of human 20S constitutive proteasome beta 2 subunit trypsin-like activity using fluorogenic peptide Ac-WLR-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha incubated for 1 to 2 hrs by fluorescence microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID459673Toxicity against zebrafish embryo assessed as embryo death at 10 umol after 24 hrs2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID706488Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human A549 cells at 100 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID459690Oral bioavailability in Sprague-Dawley rat2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1576786Cytotoxicity against human plasmablasts assessed as reduction in cell viability by CellTiter Glo assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID316530Inhibition of human cathepsin B at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1459640Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1548271Induction of cell cycle arrest in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as accumulation at G1 phase at 100 nM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 48.6%)
AID1689695Inhibition of HDAC6 in human RPMI-8226 cells incubated for 2 hrs by ELISA2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 1891,2,3-Triazole-Chalcone hybrids: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity and mechanistic investigation of apoptosis induction in multiple myeloma RPMI-8226.
AID316552Inhibition of human MMP8 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID316517AUC (0 to infinity) in CD1 mouse at 0.8 mg/kg, iv2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID640520Inhibition of peptide-glutamyl-peptide-hydrolyzing activity of 20S proteasome in human DLD1 cells transfected with 4Ub-Luc gene using Z-Leu-Leu-Glu-AMC as substrate after 6 hrs by spectrofluorometric analysis2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 20, Issue:2
Semisynthetic neoboutomellerone derivatives as ubiquitin-proteasome pathway inhibitors.
AID526555Inhibition of human calpain 1 at 100 uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1460776Inhibition of mouse CA15 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID459670Cytotoxicity against human HL60 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1548264Antiproliferative activity against human HET-1A cells incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay
AID316580Protein binding in dog plasma2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1459644Antiproliferative activity against human Bel7404 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID496341Induction of TNFalpha gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID316545Inhibition of human factor 10a at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID316563Inhibition of pig pepsin at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1439187Antiproliferative activity against human MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel non-peptide boronic acid derivatives as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496343Induction of TNFalpha gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1266947Antitumor activity against human A549 cells xenografted in nude SCID beige mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 1 mg/kg, iv administered twice per week2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 58, Issue:24
Discovery of a First-in-Class, Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable Inhibitor of the p97 AAA ATPase (CB-5083).
AID316568Inhibition of human TPA at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID658061Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 26S proteasome in human Molt4 cells using MeOSuc-Phe-Leu-Phe-AFC substrate2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, May-15, Volume: 22, Issue:10
Serendipity in discovery of proteasome inhibitors.
AID1325772Inhibition of caspase like activity of rabbit 20S proteasome using Ac-nLPnLD-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition measured after 2 hrs by fluorescence-based assay
AID1548288Induction of apoptosis in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as viable cells level at 200 nM incubated for 24 hrs by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining based FCAS analysis (Rvb = 98.1%)
AID1623360Cell cycle arrest in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 2 nM after 48 hrs by propidium iodide/RNase staining based flow cytometric method relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID1473266Toxicity in nude mouse xenografted with human RPMI8226 cells assessed as death at 1 mg/kg, iv or ip administered once in week for 35 days2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID496319Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as inhibition of HBV DNA replication at 5 mg/kg, iv single dose after 24 hrs by Southern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1252355Antiproliferative activity against human RKO cells after 72 hrs by oxyluciferin luminescence assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 25, Issue:21
Structure-activity relationship study of syringolin A as a potential anticancer agent.
AID459683Tmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1372748Inhibition of immunoproteasome caspase-like activity in human erythrocytes using Z-LRR-Glo as substrate pretreated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition measured after 10 mins by luminescence assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Immunoproteasome inhibition and bioactivity of thiasyrbactins.
AID706725Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for human Jurkat B cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49V mutant to IC50 for wild type human Jurkat cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1252353Antiproliferative activity against human A431 cells after 72 hrs by oxyluciferin luminescence assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 25, Issue:21
Structure-activity relationship study of syringolin A as a potential anticancer agent.
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID548714Cmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1325784Cytotoxicity against human MCF10A cells harboring wild type p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID1325786Cytotoxicity against HNDF cells harboring wild type p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID496340Toxicity in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver assessed as hepatitis at 5 mg/kg, iv single dose after 24 hrs by rotine immunohistochemistry method2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1156388Growth inhibition of human SK-MEL-2 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1548272Induction of cell cycle arrest in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 100 nM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 27.6%)
AID1374298Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome at 10 nM using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate by fluorescence assay relative to control2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 03-01, Volume: 26, Issue:5
Novel aromatic sulfonyl naphthalene-based boronates as 20S proteasome inhibitors.
AID1623399Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as viable cells at 3 nM after 48 hrs by Annexin-V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric method (Rvb = 98.7%)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID1459967Toxicity in human RPMI8226 cells xenografted in athymic mouse assessed as mortality at 1 mg/kg, ip administered once in a week2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 1253-Aroylindoles display antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo: Effects of N1-substituents on biological activity.
AID734745Inhibition of proteasome in human HCT116 cells assessed as accumulation of p53 by Western blotting analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Potent proteasome inhibitors derived from the unnatural cis-cyclopropane isomer of Belactosin A: synthesis, biological activity, and mode of action.
AID1459656Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Z-LRRaminoluciferin as substrate after 2 hrs by fluorescence analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID526553Inhibition of tissue plasminogen activator at 100 uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID316559Inhibition of human caspase 9 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID452100Inhibition of peptidylglutamyl peptide-hydrolyzing activity of mouse liver 20S proteasome2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of tripeptide boronic acid proteasome inhibitors.
AID1605100Cytotoxicity in human HeLa cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1141827Cytotoxic activity against human NCI-H929 cells after 72 hrs by MTS assay2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel tripeptidyl epoxyketone derivatives constructed from β-amino acid as proteasome inhibitors.
AID497569Inhibition of chymotrypsin like proteolytic activity of rabbit 26S proteasome2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 18, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological evaluation of naphthoquinone analogs as a novel class of proteasome inhibitors.
AID1687110Inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta 5 subunit chymotrypsin-like activity using fluorogenic peptide Ac-WLA-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha incubated for 1 to 2 hrs by fluorescence microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1396602Inhibition of caspase-like activity of human 20S proteasome2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID316572Inhibition of pig pancreatic elastase 1 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1156364Growth inhibition of human HOP62 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1443490Inhibition of caspase like activity of 26S proteasome derived from human MDA-MB-231 cells at 1 uM2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
First Bispecific Inhibitors of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase and the NF-κB Activity As Novel Anticancer Agents.
AID1439185Antiproliferative activity against human HL60 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel non-peptide boronic acid derivatives as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1128238Inhibition of recombinant cathepsin G (unknown origin) using Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-AMC as substrate by spectrofluorometer analysis2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID1197985Induction of cell death in human A549 cells assessed as accumulation of poly-ubiquitinated proteins at 0.025 to 0.5 uM after 24 hrs by immunoblot assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 58, Issue:4
Synthesis, characterization, and optimization for in vivo delivery of a nonselective isopeptidase inhibitor as new antineoplastic agent.
AID48219Inhibitory activity against human cathepsin G1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-17, Volume: 8, Issue:4
Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: dipeptidyl boronic acids.
AID496368Induction of IL-2 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1613999Inhibition of human hepatic cell derived 20s constitutive proteasome beta1 caspase-like activity using Suc-LLE-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Exploration of novel macrocyclic dipeptide N-benzyl amides as proteasome inhibitors.
AID700313Resistance ratio of IC50 for human bortezomib-resistant GUMBUS cells to IC50 for human GUMBUS cells2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Identification of a glutathione peroxidase inhibitor that reverses resistance to anticancer drugs in human B-cell lymphoma cell lines.
AID1506375Antiproliferative activity against human RPMI18226 cells after 72 hrs by XTT assay2017MedChemComm, Jan-01, Volume: 8, Issue:1
Withaferin A induces cell death and differentiation in multiple myeloma cancer stem cells.
AID1895435Inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta-1i subunit using (Ac-PAL)2R110 as substrate preincubated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence intensity assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID459665Cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID526417Inhibition of human cathepsin B at 100uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID316577Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1459671Antitumor activity against human Bel7404 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 13 of compound dosing relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1460773Inhibition of human CA12 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID316561Inhibition of human ECE1 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID496312Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as expression of 3.5 and 2.1 kb HBV mRNA at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 1 day by Northern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1548274Antiproliferative activity against bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay
AID611897Cytotoxicity against human FSCLL cells after 24 hrs by MTT assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13
Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors.
AID1548289Induction of apoptosis in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as early apoptotic cells level at 200 nM incubated for 24 hrs by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining based FCAS analysis (Rvb = 1.39%)
AID459666Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID640446Inhibition of 20S proteasome in human DLD1 cells transfected with 4Ub-Luc gene assessed as bioluminescence induction factor at 1 uM after 8 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to epoxomicin2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 20, Issue:2
Semisynthetic neoboutomellerone derivatives as ubiquitin-proteasome pathway inhibitors.
AID1459646Antiproliferative activity against human SKOV3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID473008Inhibition of 20S proteasome from human erythrocyte2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-25, Volume: 53, Issue:4
Studies of the synthesis of all stereoisomers of MG-132 proteasome inhibitors in the tumor targeting approach.
AID1382145Inhibition of PGPH activity of human 20S proteasome using Z-LLE-MCA as substrate measured for 1 hr by fluorescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-25, Volume: 146Ridaifen-F conjugated with cell-penetrating peptides inhibits intracellular proteasome activities and induces drug-resistant cell death.
AID1687131Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 1 subunit from bortezomib resistant Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 trophozoite infected erythrocytes assessed as inhibition of BMV037 probe labeling at 1 to 10 uM incubated for 1 hr by SDS-PAGE analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1484605Antiproliferative activity against human CEM cells after 72 hrs by calcein AM staining based fluorescence assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-28, Volume: 135Synthesis and antiproteasomal activity of novel O-benzyl salicylamide-based inhibitors built from leucine and phenylalanine.
AID611894Inhibition of intracellular chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HEK293 cells after 24 hrs by fluorescence plate reader2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13
Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors.
AID566539Inhibition of proteasome activity in human HeLa cells assessed as induction of ubiquitinG76V-FL reporter level at 5 nM after 8 hrs by luciferase assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
α,β-Unsaturated carbonyl system of chalcone-based derivatives is responsible for broad inhibition of proteasomal activity and preferential killing of human papilloma virus (HPV) positive cervical cancer cells.
AID1382149Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of human 26S proteasome using Boc-LRR-MCA as substrate measured for 1 hr by fluorescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-25, Volume: 146Ridaifen-F conjugated with cell-penetrating peptides inhibits intracellular proteasome activities and induces drug-resistant cell death.
AID1459645Antiproliferative activity against human MKN45 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID397957Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID599461Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human erythrocyte 20S proteasome using Suc-LLVY-AMC substrate incubated at 37 degC for 1 hr by fluorometric assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 19, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological evaluation of boron peptide analogues of Belactosin C as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1180860Inhibition of human 26S proteasomal catalytic subunit trypsin-like activity using Z-LRR-aminoluciferin as substrate after 4 hrs by luminescence assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Synthesis and evaluation of bisbenzylidenedioxotetrahydrothiopranones as activators of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathways and apoptotic cell death in acute promyelocytic leukemic cells.
AID1291319Cytotoxicity against human U266 cells after 72 hrs by MTS assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 26, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and docking studies of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from αα- and αβ-amino acids.
AID1474166Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring severity class index2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1180857Inhibition of human 26S proteasomal catalytic subunit trypsin-like activity using Z-LRR-aminoluciferin as substrate after 2 hrs by luminescence assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Synthesis and evaluation of bisbenzylidenedioxotetrahydrothiopranones as activators of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathways and apoptotic cell death in acute promyelocytic leukemic cells.
AID1496304Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate after 1 hr by fluorescence analysis2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 28, Issue:12
Discovery of novel 20S proteasome inhibitors by rational topology-based scaffold hopping of bortezomib.
AID1396604Cytotoxicity against human RPMI8226 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 aqueous one solution assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID316518Volume of distribution at steady state in CD1 mouse at 0.8 mg/kg, iv2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID316548Inhibition of human MMP1 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID548701Cytotoxicity against human PC3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID397959Cytotoxicity against human HL60 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID316542Inhibition of human chymotrypsin at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1312161Inhibition of Drosophila melanogaster beta-carbonic anhydrase preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID640519Inhibition of 20S proteasome in human DLD1 cells transfected with 4Ub-Luc gene assessed as bioluminescence induction factor at 0.1 uM after 8 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay relative to epoxomicin2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 20, Issue:2
Semisynthetic neoboutomellerone derivatives as ubiquitin-proteasome pathway inhibitors.
AID1439191Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel non-peptide boronic acid derivatives as proteasome inhibitors.
AID459685Mean residence time in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1605098Inhibition of ClpP in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 33591 assessed as reduction in bacteria-induced hemolysis of sheep erythrocytes by measuring hemoglobin release incubated for 15 mins2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1312152Inhibition of human carbonic anhydrase-1 preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID1459665Antitumor activity against human Bel7404 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 6 of compound dosing relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1605110Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus ClpXP expressed in Escherichia coli BL2 (DE3) at 1 to 100 uM using FITC-casein substrate in presence of ATP-regenerating system incubated for 50 mins by fluorescence based assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID397953Cytotoxicity against human SKOV3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID1895439Inhibition of human 20S proteasome beta2 subunit using Ac-RLR-AMC as substrate preincubated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence intensity assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID516391Inhibition of caspase like activity of partially purified human proteasome2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Oct-01, Volume: 20, Issue:19
Structure-activity relationship of boronic acid derivatives of tyropeptin: proteasome inhibitors.
AID1574454Inhibition of deubiquitinase in HEK293T cells expressing N-terminal HA-tagged ubiquitin assessed as stabilization of HMW-Ub proteins at 1 uM after 2 hrs by Western blot analysis2019Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 01-15, Volume: 29, Issue:2
Diarylcarbonates are a new class of deubiquitinating enzyme inhibitor.
AID1576791Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 5i in human PBMC cells assessed as induction of PSMB6 expression at 100 nM after 3 to 72 hrs by RT-PCR analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID1918921Antiproliferative activity against human MM1.R cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation incubated for 72 hrs by XTT assay2022Journal of natural products, 12-23, Volume: 85, Issue:12
Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Compounds from
AID1180862Inhibition of human 26S proteasomal catalytic subunit chymotrypsin-like activity using Suc-LLVYaminoluciferin as substrate after 4 hrs by luminescence assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Synthesis and evaluation of bisbenzylidenedioxotetrahydrothiopranones as activators of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathways and apoptotic cell death in acute promyelocytic leukemic cells.
AID1548258Antiproliferative activity against human RPMI8226 cells incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay
AID1689694Inhibition of HDAC8 in human RPMI-8226 cells incubated for 2 hrs by ELISA2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 1891,2,3-Triazole-Chalcone hybrids: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity and mechanistic investigation of apoptosis induction in multiple myeloma RPMI-8226.
AID1730988Induction of human 20S proteosome mediated human alpha-synuclein degradation at 10 uM2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 03-15, Volume: 36Dihydroquinazolines enhance 20S proteasome activity and induce degradation of α-synuclein, an intrinsically disordered protein associated with neurodegeneration.
AID459686AUC (0 to t) in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID599473Cell cycle arrest in human HeLa cells assessed as accumulation at G2/M phase at 0.1 uM after 24 hrs by flow cytometry (Rvb = 13.7 +/- 0.87%)2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 19, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological evaluation of boron peptide analogues of Belactosin C as proteasome inhibitors.
AID611895Ratio of IC50 for intracellular chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HEK293 cells to IC50 for in vitro chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13
Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors.
AID1882258Inhibition of proteasome (unknown origin)2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-05, Volume: 229A review on the treatment of multiple myeloma with small molecular agents in the past five years.
AID496331Induction of Usp18 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv by RT- PCR2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID496356Induction of IL-5 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID548708AUC (0-t) in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID496320Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as expression of 3.5 and 2.1 kb HBV mRNA at 0.2 mg/kg, iv single dose after 24 hrs2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID353999Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome beta 5 subunit by proteasome active site ELISA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-14, Volume: 52, Issue:9
Design and synthesis of an orally bioavailable and selective peptide epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor (PR-047).
AID316549Inhibition of human MMP2 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1576790Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 5i in human PBMC cells assessed as induction of PSMB5 expression at 100 nM after 3 to 72 hrs by RT-PCR analysis2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID1156390Growth inhibition of human SK-MEL-5 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID353300Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8
Synthesis of boronic acid derivatives of tyropeptin: proteasome inhibitors.
AID1459692Toxicity in human Bel7404 cells xenografted BALB/c mouse assessed as effect on body weight at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 10 of compound dosing (Rvb = 26.30 +/- 0.78 g)2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1225670Inhibition of proteasome (unknown origin)2015Journal of natural products, Apr-24, Volume: 78, Issue:4
Cystargolides, 20S Proteasome Inhibitors Isolated from Kitasatospora cystarginea.
AID1459695Toxicity in human Bel7404 cells xenografted BALB/c mouse assessed as effect on body weight at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 13 of compound dosing (Rvb = 26.10 +/- 1.08 g)2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1687123Antiplasmodial activity against DHA-resistant and sorbitol synchronized ring stage forms of Plasmodium falciparum Cam3.II^R539T expressing K13 mutant assessed as reduction in parasitemia incubated for 3 hrs by pulse exposure based Syto-61 staining dye bas2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1325776Cytotoxicity against human WE68 cells harboring wild type p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID1250150Cytotoxicity against human Glioma cells (HF2790) after 72 hrs by CelltiterGlo assay2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
High-Throughput Screening of Patient-Derived Cultures Reveals Potential for Precision Medicine in Glioblastoma.
AID700323Cytotoxicity against human GUMBUS cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Identification of a glutathione peroxidase inhibitor that reverses resistance to anticancer drugs in human B-cell lymphoma cell lines.
AID1460768Inhibition of human CA5A by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID1604188Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 1c (unknown origin) to IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 1i (unknown origin)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID1156356Growth inhibition of human CCRF-CEM cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1460766Inhibition of human CA3 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID1291321Cytotoxicity against human ARH77 cells after 72 hrs by MTS assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 26, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and docking studies of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from αα- and αβ-amino acids.
AID1443452Inhibition of IL-1beta-stimulated nuclear translocation of GFP-tagged NF-kappaB-p65 (unknown origin) expressed in CHO cells preincubated with IL-1beta for 30 mins followed by compound addition by fluorescence assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
First Bispecific Inhibitors of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase and the NF-κB Activity As Novel Anticancer Agents.
AID316558Inhibition of human caspase 8 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID706727Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 1000 nM bortezonib-resistant human Jurkat B2 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49T homozygous mutant to IC50 for wild type human Jurkat cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID706729Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 100 nM bortezonib-resistant human THP1 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49T mutant to IC50 for wild type human THP1 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1822759Inhibition of wild type Candida albicans Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphate Aldolase transfected in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) at 50 uM incubated for 3 mins in presence of NADH by spectrophotometric analysis relative to control2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-10, Volume: 65, Issue:3
Structure-Guided Discovery of the Novel Covalent Allosteric Site and Covalent Inhibitors of Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphate Aldolase to Overcome the Azole Resistance of
AID1624029Inhibition of thrombin (unknown origin) at 10 ug/mL using substrate 3 relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID1459680Antitumor activity against human Bel7404 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 24 of compound dosing relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1687107Inhibition of human 20S constitutive proteasome beta 5 subunit chymotrypsin-like activity using fluorogenic peptide Ac-WLA-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha incubated for 1 to 2 hrs by fluorescence microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1375829Inhibition of proteasome in human SKOV3/TR cells assessed as decrease in cell viability after 4 days by CellTiter-Glo assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-14, Volume: 61, Issue:11
Discovery of Orally Bioavailable, Quinoline-Based Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) Inhibitors with Potent Cellular Activity.
AID1374302Metabolic stability in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes assessed as parent compound remaining at 20 mM preincubated for 5 mins followed by NADPH addition measured after 40 mins by HPLC analysis2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 03-01, Volume: 26, Issue:5
Novel aromatic sulfonyl naphthalene-based boronates as 20S proteasome inhibitors.
AID496344Induction of TNFalpha gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID459669Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID459671Cytotoxicity against human U266 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID452099Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of mouse liver 20S proteasome2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of tripeptide boronic acid proteasome inhibitors.
AID700319Cytotoxicity against human DOGUM cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Identification of a glutathione peroxidase inhibitor that reverses resistance to anticancer drugs in human B-cell lymphoma cell lines.
AID496376Induction of IL1-beta gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1473236Cell cycle arrest in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 13.5%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1128240Cell cycle arrest in human HCT116 cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 100 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 45.3%)2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID1156386Growth inhibition of human M14 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1576782Selectivity ratio, ratio of IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 1c (unknown origin) to IC50 for human 20S proteasome beta 5i2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID1548261Antiproliferative activity against HUVEC cells incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay
AID496377Induction of IL-3 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1156365Growth inhibition of human HOP92 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID316566Inhibition of human renin at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1156407Growth inhibition of human UO31 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1624051Antitumor activity against human RPMI8226 cells xenografted in CB17 NOD/SCID mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 1 mg/kg, iv administered for 18 days through regimen of twice weekly for three weeks on days 1 and 42019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID1576784Cytotoxicity against human PBMC cells assessed as reduction in cell viability by CellTiter Glo assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1895459Cytotoxicity against human primary hepatocytes assessed as depletion of ATP content up to 500 uM incubated for 48 to 72 hrs by CellTiter-Glo luminescent assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID1250148Cytotoxicity against human Glioma cells (HF2381) after 72 hrs by CelltiterGlo assay2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
High-Throughput Screening of Patient-Derived Cultures Reveals Potential for Precision Medicine in Glioblastoma.
AID1156404Growth inhibition of human RXF393 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1623396Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as early apoptotic cells at 3 nM after 48 hrs by Annexin-V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric method (Rvb = 1.05%)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID496354Induction of IL-5 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1312162Inhibition of Flaveria bidentis beta-carbonic anhydrase preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID1464416Inhibition of TNFalpha-stimulated NF-kappaB (unknown origin) activation expressed in HEK293 cells incubated for 6 hrs with TNFalpha followed by incubation in dark for 30 mins by luciferase reporter gene assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 10-15, Volume: 27, Issue:20
Design and synthesis of pregnenolone/2-cyanoacryloyl conjugates with dual NF-κB inhibitory and anti-proliferative activities.
AID548718Apparent volume of distribution in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID452102Cytotoxicity against human U266 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of tripeptide boronic acid proteasome inhibitors.
AID1299911Inhibition of PGPH-like activity of rabbit 20S proteasome using Cbz-LLE-AMC substrate incubated at 37 degC by fluorometric assay2016ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-10, Volume: 7, Issue:3
Synthesis and Evaluation of Macrocyclic Peptide Aldehydes as Potent and Selective Inhibitors of the 20S Proteasome.
AID566538Inhibition of proteasome activity in human HeLa cells assessed as induction of ubiquitinG76V-FL reporter level at 1 uM after 8 hrs by luciferase assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-27, Volume: 54, Issue:2
α,β-Unsaturated carbonyl system of chalcone-based derivatives is responsible for broad inhibition of proteasomal activity and preferential killing of human papilloma virus (HPV) positive cervical cancer cells.
AID316522Oral bioavailability in CD1 mouse at 4 mg/kg2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1864398Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta1 subunit (unknown origin) using Z-LLE-AMC as flurogenic substrate measured after 1 hr by fluorescence based analysis2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-22, Volume: 65, Issue:18
Discovery of a Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor to Block NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation with Anti-inflammation Activity.
AID496322Toxicity in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as stress, ruffled fur at 5 mg/kg, iv after 24 hrs2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1439186Antiproliferative activity against human RPMI8226 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel non-peptide boronic acid derivatives as proteasome inhibitors.
AID706724Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for human Jurkat B cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49T/A50V double mutant to IC50 for wild type human Jurkat cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID548709Mean residence time (0-t) in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1460767Inhibition of human CA4 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID1762748Inhibition of TNFalpha-induced NFkappaB activation in HEK293 cells assessed as luciferase expression by luciferase reporter activity assay2021Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 06-15, Volume: 42Synthesis of pyranochalcone derivatives and their inhibitory effect on NF-κB activation.
AID459662Cytotoxicity against human BCG823 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID496318Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as inhibition of HBV DNA replication at 0.2 mg/kg, iv single dose after 24 hrs by Southern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID459687Terminal half life in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID617479Inhibition of HIF1alpha expression in human LN229 cells assessed as reduction of HIF-1alpha accumulation at 100 nM preincubated for 1 hr under normoxia condition followed by 24 hrs incubation under hypoxia condition by Western blotting2011Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Sep-15, Volume: 21, Issue:18
Sulfonamides as a new scaffold for hypoxia inducible factor pathway inhibitors.
AID1895458Cytotoxicity against Wistar Han rat hepatocytes assessed as depletion of ATP content up to 500 uM incubated for 48 to 72 hrs by CellTiter-Glo luminescent assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID459675Toxicity against zebrafish embryo assessed as cell death in embryo at 1 umol after 24 hrs2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1325791Inhibition of 26S proteasome in human MCF7 cells assessed as accumulation of high molecular weight polyubiquitin-conjugated proteins at 35 nM after 4 hrs by Western blot analysis
AID1156403Growth inhibition of human CAKI-1 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1687109Inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta 2 subunit trypsin-like activity using fluorogenic peptide Ac-WLR-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha incubated for 1 to 2 hrs by fluorescence microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID706492Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human HT-29 cells at 200 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID496358Induction of IL-1alpha gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID623567Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of purified human 20S proteasome in HL60 cells using N-succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate pre-incubated for 10 mins by fluorimetric assay2011Journal of natural products, Oct-28, Volume: 74, Issue:10
Bioassay-guided isolation of constituents of Piper sarmentosum using a mitochondrial transmembrane potential assay.
AID496360Induction of IL-1alpha gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1141826Cytotoxic activity against human RPMI8226 cells after 72 hrs by MTS assay2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel tripeptidyl epoxyketone derivatives constructed from β-amino acid as proteasome inhibitors.
AID706508Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 100 nM bortezonib-resistant human A549 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 M45V/A49T double mutant to IC50 for wild type human A549 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID641892Inhibition of hypoxia-induced HIF1alpha accumulation in human LN229 cells at 20 uM after 1 hr preincubation measured after 24 hrs by Western blot analysis2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-22, Volume: 54, Issue:24
Design and synthesis of novel small-molecule inhibitors of the hypoxia inducible factor pathway.
AID1689693Inhibition of HDAC3 in human RPMI-8226 cells incubated for 2 hrs by ELISA2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 1891,2,3-Triazole-Chalcone hybrids: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity and mechanistic investigation of apoptosis induction in multiple myeloma RPMI-8226.
AID1687108Inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta 1 subunit caspase-like activity using fluorogenic peptide Ac-nLPnLD-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha incubated for 1 to 2 hrs by fluorescence microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1548266Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as induction of caspase-3/7 activation incubated for 24 hrs by fluorometric assay
AID1312159Inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis beta-carbonic anhydrase Rv1284 preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID1128246Binding affinity to beta5 subunit of 20S proteasome (unknown origin) assessed as dissociation half-life2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID734746Cell cycle arrest in human HCT116 cells assessed as accumulation at G2/M phase after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining-based flow cytometric analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Potent proteasome inhibitors derived from the unnatural cis-cyclopropane isomer of Belactosin A: synthesis, biological activity, and mode of action.
AID1459632Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Z-LRRaminoluciferin as substrate at 0.2 uM after 2 hrs by fluorescence analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID496307Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver assessed as inhibition of proteosome activity at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 6 hrs2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1404726Antiproliferative activity against HUVEC after 48 hrs by CCK8 assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154A novel NAE/UAE dual inhibitor LP0040 blocks neddylation and ubiquitination leading to growth inhibition and apoptosis of cancer cells.
AID733002Inhibition of gamma-secretase-mediated betaAPP K670N/M671L mutant cleavage in HEK293 cells assessed as inhibition of amyloid beta40/42 production at 60 uM after 8 hrs by chemiluminescence assay relative to control2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 21, Issue:4
Further characterization of a putative serine protease contributing to the γ-secretase cleavage of β-amyloid precursor protein.
AID316570Inhibition of human tryptase at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1156377Growth inhibition of human SW620 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496323Toxicity in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver assessed as serum alanine aminotransferase level at 5 mg/kg, iv after 24 hrs2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID548713Tmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID734742Reversible inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome beta 5 subunit using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate incubated for 12 hrs prior to substrate addition followed by compound wash out measured after 1 hr by dialysis method2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Potent proteasome inhibitors derived from the unnatural cis-cyclopropane isomer of Belactosin A: synthesis, biological activity, and mode of action.
AID397954Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID316571Inhibition of human neutrophil elastase 2 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1459689Toxicity in human Bel7404 cells xenografted BALB/c mouse assessed as effect on body weight at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 6 of compound dosing (Rvb = 25.65 +/- 0.70 g)2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1815776Cytotoxicity against oleic acid-induced human HeLa cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2022ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-13, Volume: 13, Issue:1
The BASHY Platform Enables the Assembly of a Fluorescent Bortezomib-GV1001 Conjugate.
AID1486819Cytotoxicity against human HCT116 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1895437Inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta-5i subunit using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate preincubated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence intensity assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID1459657Inhibition of caspase-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Z-nLPnLDaminoluciferin as substrate after 2 hrs by fluorescence analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1156395Growth inhibition of human OVCAR4 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1624025Inhibition of human 20S proteasome preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID1864397Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta2 subunit (unknown origin) using Boc-LRR-AMC as flurogenic substrate measured after 1 hr by fluorescence based analysis2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-22, Volume: 65, Issue:18
Discovery of a Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor to Block NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation with Anti-inflammation Activity.
AID1605108Inhibition of N-terminal His6-sumo-tagged full length Staphylococcus aureus ClpP expressed in Escherichia coli BL2 (DE3) assessed as enzyme activity recovery level at 20-fold molar excess pre-incubated for 10 mins before Suc-LY-AMC addition and measured a2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID526551Inhibition of human plasmin at 100 uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID706500Effect on PSMB5 mRNA expression in human Jurkat-B cells expressing PSMB5 G322A/C323T mutant at 1000 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1291320Cytotoxicity against human RPMI8226 cells after 72 hrs by MTS assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 26, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and docking studies of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from αα- and αβ-amino acids.
AID526549Inhibition of human chymotrypsin at 100 uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1473237Cell cycle arrest in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as accumulation at G2/M phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 31.63%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID706737Reversible inhibition of human erythrocyte derived 20S proteasome subunit beta2 after 30 mins by fluorogenic assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID459663Cytotoxicity against human H460 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1180859Inhibition of human 26S proteasomal catalytic subunit chymotrypsin-like activity using Suc-LLVYaminoluciferin as substrate after 2 hrs by luminescence assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Synthesis and evaluation of bisbenzylidenedioxotetrahydrothiopranones as activators of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathways and apoptotic cell death in acute promyelocytic leukemic cells.
AID1461482Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in rabbit 20S proteasome pre-incubated for 10 mins before Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC substrate addition and measured after 2 hrs by fluorescence assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Azobenzene-containing photoswitchable proteasome inhibitors with selective activity and cellular toxicity.
AID496325Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as increase in serum HBsAg level at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 24 hrs by ELISA2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID459680Terminal half life in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID496308Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver assessed as inhibition of HBV DNA replication at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 24 hrs by Southern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID373868Inhibition of SDS-activated 20S proteasome activity in rabbit muscle2009European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr, Volume: 44, Issue:4
3D-QSAR studies of boron-containing dipeptides as proteasome inhibitors with CoMFA and CoMSIA methods.
AID706502Effect on PSMB5 mRNA expression in human Jurkat-B cells expressing PSMB5 G322A mutant at 1000 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID496371Induction of OAS gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1576777Selectivity ratio, ratio of IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 5c (unknown origin) to IC50 for human 20S proteasome beta 5i2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID496362Induction of IFN-gamma gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID588213Literature-mined compound from Fourches et al multi-species drug-induced liver injury (DILI) dataset, effect in non-rodents2010Chemical research in toxicology, Jan, Volume: 23, Issue:1
Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species.
AID1459683Toxicity in human Bel7404 cells xenografted BALB/c mouse assessed as effect on body weight at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 1 of compound dosing (Rvb = 25.36 +/- 0.97 g)2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1674998Antiinflammatory activity against mouse RAW264.7 cells assessed as inhibition of LPS-stimulated NO production2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 09-01, Volume: 30, Issue:17
Synthesis and evaluation of 1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives as potential anti-inflammatory agents by inhibiting NF-κB signaling pathway in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells.
AID496352Induction of IL-4 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID496374Induction of IL1-beta gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1363791Inhibition of proteasome in human HL60 cells assessed as increase in cleaved PARP expression at 1 to 100 nM after 24 hrs by immunoblot assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Discovery of the First-in-Class Dual Histone Deacetylase-Proteasome Inhibitor.
AID706738Reversible inhibition of human erythrocyte derived 20S proteasome subunit beta5 after 30 mins by fluorogenic assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1687121Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by cell-titer glo assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1548300Induction of cell cycle arrest in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as accumulation at G1 phase at 100 nM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 42%)
AID1363793Inhibition of proteasome in imatinib-resistant human SUP-B15 cells assessed as increase in cleaved PARP expression at 1 to 100 nM after 24 hrs by immunoblot assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Discovery of the First-in-Class Dual Histone Deacetylase-Proteasome Inhibitor.
AID1301231Inhibition of human 20S proteasome chymotryptic-like activity using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate measured for 30 mins by fluorescence assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
Substituted quinolines as noncovalent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1459668Antitumor activity against human Bel7404 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 10 of compound dosing relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID238893Inhibitory activity against 20S proteasome chymotrypsin-like activity2005Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-13, Volume: 48, Issue:1
Retro hydrazino-azapeptoids as peptidomimetics of proteasome inhibitors.
AID1156366Growth inhibition of human NCI-H226 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID316498Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human erythrocyte 20S proteasome2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1473229Cell cycle arrest in human U266 cells assessed as accumulation at G2/M phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 35.13%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1404725Antiproliferative activity against HEK293T cells after 48 hrs by CCK8 assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154A novel NAE/UAE dual inhibitor LP0040 blocks neddylation and ubiquitination leading to growth inhibition and apoptosis of cancer cells.
AID1623349Cytotoxicity against human RPMI8226 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability at 3 nM after 48 hrs by CCK8 assay relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID1363840Inhibition of proteasome in human SEM cells assessed as increase in aggresome accumulation at 10 nM after 18 hrs by fluorescence microscopic method2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Discovery of the First-in-Class Dual Histone Deacetylase-Proteasome Inhibitor.
AID706730Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 7 nM bortezonib-resistant human RPMI8226 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 T21A mutant to IC50 for wild type human RPMI8226 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1137839Inhibition of immunoproteasome 20S subunit beta5i in human Karpas 1106p cell extract at 10 to 100 nM2014ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-10, Volume: 5, Issue:4
Oxathiazolones Selectively Inhibit the Human Immunoproteasome over the Constitutive Proteasome.
AID1299918Inhibition of m-calpain (unknown origin) using Suc-LY-AMC as substrate at 100 uM by fluorometric assay2016ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-10, Volume: 7, Issue:3
Synthesis and Evaluation of Macrocyclic Peptide Aldehydes as Potent and Selective Inhibitors of the 20S Proteasome.
AID1156367Growth inhibition of human NCI-H23 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1918920Antiproliferative activity against human MM1.S cells assessed as inhibition of cell proliferation incubated for 72 hrs by XTT assay2022Journal of natural products, 12-23, Volume: 85, Issue:12
Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Compounds from
AID706479Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta1/beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human AMO-1a cells at 20 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1372745Inhibition of 20s constitutive proteasome caspase-like activity in human erythrocytes using Z-LRR-Glo as substrate pretreated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition measured after 10 mins by luminescence assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Immunoproteasome inhibition and bioactivity of thiasyrbactins.
AID1566918Antimalarial activity against erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 harboring 20S beta5 proteasome A49S mutant measured after 72 hrs by SYBR green dye based fluorescence assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-11, Volume: 62, Issue:13
Improvement of Asparagine Ethylenediamines as Anti-malarial
AID496333Induction of ISG15 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 0.2-5 mg/kg, iv after 24 hrs by RT- PCR2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1690793Reversible inhibition of human 20S proteasome beta5 subunit assessed as residual enzyme activity using Suc-LLVY-Glo as substrate preincubated for 2 hrs followed by compound washout and further incubated for 4 hrs followed by substrate addition and measure
AID1156412Growth inhibition of human Hs 578T cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1156378Growth inhibition of human SF268 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1128229Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID1548265Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells incubated for 24 hrs by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining based flow cytometry
AID706515Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 200 nM bortezonib-resistant human CEM cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49V /C52F double mutant to IC50 for wild type human CEM cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1484606Antiproliferative activity against human U266 cells after 72 hrs by calcein AM staining based fluorescence assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-28, Volume: 135Synthesis and antiproteasomal activity of novel O-benzyl salicylamide-based inhibitors built from leucine and phenylalanine.
AID1486817Cytotoxicity against human MGC803 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1459674Antitumor activity against human Bel7404 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 17 of compound dosing relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID750163Inhibition of human 20S proteasome chymotrypsin like activity using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate at 20 uM measured over 10 mins by fluorescence assay relative to control2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 64Development of peptidomimetic boronates as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1382148Inhibition of PGPH activity of human 26S proteasome using Z-LLE-MCA as substrate measured for 1 hr by fluorescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-25, Volume: 146Ridaifen-F conjugated with cell-penetrating peptides inhibits intracellular proteasome activities and induces drug-resistant cell death.
AID1312158Inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis beta-carbonic anhydrase Rv3273 preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID1548287Induction of apoptosis in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as necrotic cells level at 50 nM incubated for 24 hrs by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining based FCAS analysis (Rvb = 0.11%)
AID1460774Inhibition of human CA13 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID1864384Cytotoxicity against HEK293 cells incubated for 24 hrs2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-22, Volume: 65, Issue:18
Discovery of a Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor to Block NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation with Anti-inflammation Activity.
AID1473259Induction of apoptosis in human NCI-H929 cells at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1156368Growth inhibition of human NCI-H322M cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1548291Induction of apoptosis in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as necrotic cells level at 200 nM incubated for 24 hrs by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining based FCAS analysis (Rvb = 0.11%)
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1460771Inhibition of human CA7 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID164126Inhibitory activity against 20S Proteasome1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-17, Volume: 8, Issue:4
Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: dipeptidyl boronic acids.
AID496364Induction of IFN-gamma gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID706513Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 150 nM bortezonib-resistant human SW1573 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 C52F mutant to IC50 for wild type human SW1573 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID526552Inhibition of human thrombin at 100 uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID706489Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human A549 cells at 40 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID526418Inhibition of human cathepsin L at 100uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID316562Inhibition of human NEP at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1295431Cytotoxicity against human ARH77 cells assessed as cell viability after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 aqueous one solution cell proliferation assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
3D-QSAR-aided design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors and mechanism studies.
AID496349Induction of IL-4 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1548279Induction of apoptosis in bortezomib resistant human KM3 cells at 100 nM incubated for 24 hrs by TUNEL assay
AID706517Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 100 nM bortezonib-resistant human RPMI8226 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49T mutant to IC50 for wild type human RPMI8226 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1299910Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of rabbit 20S proteasome using Cbz-ARR-AMC substrate incubated at 37 degC by fluorometric assay2016ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-10, Volume: 7, Issue:3
Synthesis and Evaluation of Macrocyclic Peptide Aldehydes as Potent and Selective Inhibitors of the 20S Proteasome.
AID1605097Inhibition of N-terminal His6-sumo-tagged full length Staphylococcus aureus ClpP expressed in Escherichia coli BL2 (DE3) assessed as Kinact/Ki ratio pre-incubated for 10 mins before Suc-LY-AMC addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1291322Inhibition of chymotrypsin like activity of human 20S proteasome using ZGlyGlyLeuAMC/SucLeuLeuValTyrAMC as substrate measured every minute for 25 mins by fluorescence assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 26, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and docking studies of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from αα- and αβ-amino acids.
AID316536Inhibition of human cathepsin H at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID706486Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human SW1573 cells at 150 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1180861Inhibition of human 26S proteasomal catalytic subunit caspase-like activity using Z-nLPnLD-aminoluciferin as substrate after 4 hrs by luminescence assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Synthesis and evaluation of bisbenzylidenedioxotetrahydrothiopranones as activators of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathways and apoptotic cell death in acute promyelocytic leukemic cells.
AID736675Cytotoxicity against human HEK293 cells expressing murine FAP at 0.0001 uM to 100 uM after 48 hrs by CellTiter-Blue assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Identification of selective and potent inhibitors of fibroblast activation protein and prolyl oligopeptidase.
AID706736Reversible inhibition of human erythrocyte derived 20S proteasome subunit beta1 after 30 mins by fluorogenic assay2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID496316Toxicity in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver assessed as serum alanine aminotransferase level at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1825582Cytotoxicity in human bone marrow mononuclear cell assessed as viable cells at 50 nM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin V staining based flow cytometric analysis (Rvb = 77.9%)2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-10, Volume: 65, Issue:3
Synthesis and Evaluation of Structurally Diverse C-2-Substituted Thienopyrimidine-Based Inhibitors of the Human Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase.
AID526554Inhibition of human trypsin at 100 uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1605106Binding affinity to N-terminal His6-sumo-tagged full length Staphylococcus aureus ClpP expressed in Escherichia coli BL2 (DE3) assessed as change in melting temperature at 100 uM by differential scanning calorimetry analysis2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1404727Antiproliferative activity against human LO2 cells after 48 hrs by CCK8 assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun-25, Volume: 154A novel NAE/UAE dual inhibitor LP0040 blocks neddylation and ubiquitination leading to growth inhibition and apoptosis of cancer cells.
AID1604184Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 2c (unknown origin) after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID1375844Induction of mitotic arrest in human SKOV3/TR cells at 1 uM after overnight incubation by Hoechst 33342 staining-based assay (Rvb = 11.6 +/- 1.2%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-14, Volume: 61, Issue:11
Discovery of Orally Bioavailable, Quinoline-Based Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) Inhibitors with Potent Cellular Activity.
AID1687135Inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta 1 subunit assessed as inhibition of BMV037 probe labeling at 1 to 10 uM incubated for 1 hr by SDS-PAGE analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1613994Inhibition of human hepatic cell derived 20s constitutive proteasome beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity using Suc-WLA-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Exploration of novel macrocyclic dipeptide N-benzyl amides as proteasome inhibitors.
AID497571Inhibition of PGPH activity of rabbit 26S proteasome2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Aug-01, Volume: 18, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological evaluation of naphthoquinone analogs as a novel class of proteasome inhibitors.
AID1595605Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H727 cells after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 AQueous one solution cell proliferation assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-09, Volume: 62, Issue:9
Development of Novel Epoxyketone-Based Proteasome Inhibitors as a Strategy To Overcome Cancer Resistance to Carfilzomib and Bortezomib.
AID1156387Growth inhibition of human MDA-MB-435 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496361Induction of IFN-gamma gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID706723Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for bortezonib-resistant human KMS11 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49T mutant to IC50 for wild type human KMS11 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1156346Inhibition of bovine pancreatic alpha-chymotrypsin using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate by fluorescence assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1325780Cytotoxicity against human MCF7 cells harboring wild type p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID1548268Induction of cell cycle arrest in human KM3 cells assessed as reduction in cell cycle progression in G2/M phase at 100 nM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry
AID1291318Inhibition of chymotrypsin like activity of human erythrocyte-derived 20S proteasome preincubated for 10 mins using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 26, Issue:8
Design, synthesis and docking studies of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from αα- and αβ-amino acids.
AID750162Inhibition of human 20S proteasome chymotrypsin like activity using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate measured over 10 mins by fluorescence assay2013European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jun, Volume: 64Development of peptidomimetic boronates as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1363792Inhibition of proteasome in human SEM cells assessed as increase in cleaved PARP expression at 1 to 100 nM after 24 hrs by immunoblot assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Discovery of the First-in-Class Dual Histone Deacetylase-Proteasome Inhibitor.
AID1156357Growth inhibition of human HL-60(TB) cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1614002Inhibition of human peripheral blood derived 20s immunoproteasome beta2 trypsin-like activity using Suc-PAL-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Exploration of novel macrocyclic dipeptide N-benzyl amides as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496329Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as serum HBeAg and HBsAg level at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 6 days2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1548259Antiproliferative activity against human U266 cells incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay
AID1156402Growth inhibition of human ACHN cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1363797Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Suc-LLVY aminoluciferin as substrate after 2 hrs by proteasome-Glo assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Discovery of the First-in-Class Dual Histone Deacetylase-Proteasome Inhibitor.
AID1374299Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 03-01, Volume: 26, Issue:5
Novel aromatic sulfonyl naphthalene-based boronates as 20S proteasome inhibitors.
AID1180858Inhibition of human 26S proteasomal catalytic subunit caspase-like activity using Z-nLPnLD-aminoluciferin as substrate after 2 hrs by luminescence assay2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-24, Volume: 57, Issue:14
Synthesis and evaluation of bisbenzylidenedioxotetrahydrothiopranones as activators of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling pathways and apoptotic cell death in acute promyelocytic leukemic cells.
AID1576781Selectivity ratio, ratio of IC50 for human 20S proteasome beta 1i to IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 5i (unknown origin)2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID1460772Inhibition of human CA9 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID706511Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 80 nM bortezonib-resistant human H460 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49T mutant to IC50 for wild type human H460 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID459667Cytotoxicity against human PC3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1566916Antimalarial activity against erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 measured after 72 hrs by SYBR green dye based fluorescence assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-11, Volume: 62, Issue:13
Improvement of Asparagine Ethylenediamines as Anti-malarial
AID1198171Metabolic stability in human liver microsomes2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 58, Issue:4
Proteasome inhibitors with pyrazole scaffolds from structure-based virtual screening.
AID1156382Growth inhibition of human SNB75 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1605101Cytotoxicity in human HepG2 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1486818Cytotoxicity against human 95-D cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496449Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as serum HBeAg and HBsAg level at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 2 days2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1156415Growth inhibition of human MDA-MB-468 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID548720Toxicity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as incidence of mortality at 1 mg/kg, iv after 10 hrs2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1325771Inhibition of trypsin like activity of rabbit 20S proteasome using Bz-Val-Gly-Arg-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition measured after 2 hrs by fluorescence-based assay
AID1584466Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as early apoptotic cells at 10 nM after 72 hrs by APC Annexin V/eFluor-780-viability double staining-based FACS analysis (Rvb = 3.31%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Unraveling the Prenylation-Cancer Paradox in Multiple Myeloma with Novel Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase (GGPPS) Inhibitors.
AID599464Growth inhibition of human HeLa cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 19, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological evaluation of boron peptide analogues of Belactosin C as proteasome inhibitors.
AID316543Inhibition of human chymotrypsin2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1674464Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of Leishmania tarentolae proteasome beta 42020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-08, Volume: 63, Issue:19
Discovery and Characterization of Clinical Candidate LXE408 as a Kinetoplastid-Selective Proteasome Inhibitor for the Treatment of Leishmaniases.
AID1486826Selectivity ratio of IC50 for PGPH-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells to IC50 for chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1396601Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate incubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition measured after 1 hr by spectrofluorimetric method2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID1864383Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta5 subunit (unknown origin) using Suc-LLVY-AMC as flurogenic substrate measured after 1 hr by fluorescence based analysis2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-22, Volume: 65, Issue:18
Discovery of a Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor to Block NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation with Anti-inflammation Activity.
AID706493Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human HT-29 cells at 100 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID706491Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human H460 cells at 80 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID316565Inhibition of human plasmin at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1624033Inhibition of trypsin (unknown origin) at 10 ug/mL relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID1312160Inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis beta-carbonic anhydrase Rv3588 preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID1486820Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID706476Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human HT-29 cells at 100 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID734747Cytotoxicity against human HCT116 cells after 72 hrs by CCK-8 assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Potent proteasome inhibitors derived from the unnatural cis-cyclopropane isomer of Belactosin A: synthesis, biological activity, and mode of action.
AID1595604Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H23 cells after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 AQueous one solution cell proliferation assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-09, Volume: 62, Issue:9
Development of Novel Epoxyketone-Based Proteasome Inhibitors as a Strategy To Overcome Cancer Resistance to Carfilzomib and Bortezomib.
AID1687102Inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum 20S proteasome beta 2 subunit trypsin-like activity using fluorogenic peptide Ac-WLR-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha incubated for 1 to 2 hrs by fluorescence microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1687120Cytotoxicity against human HCT116 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by cell-titer glo assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID548721Toxicity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as incidence of mortality at 1 mg/kg, ig after 10 hrs2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1156380Growth inhibition of human SF539 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1198170Metabolic stability in Balb/c mouse liver microsomes2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 58, Issue:4
Proteasome inhibitors with pyrazole scaffolds from structure-based virtual screening.
AID761479Inhibition of 20S proteasome (unknown origin)2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-25, Volume: 56, Issue:14
Inhibition of the human proteasome by imidazoline scaffolds.
AID526415Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20s proteasome beta-1 subunit in human erythrocyte assessed as hydrolysis of Ac-WLA-AMC fluorogenic substrate2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID706483Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human THP1 cells at 50 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID316554Inhibition of human caspase 1 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1156385Growth inhibition of human MALME-3M cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1576780Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 1c derived from human erythrocytes preincubated for 1 hr using Z-nLPnLD-Glo peptide as substrate by proteasome-glo caspase-like assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID1382147Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-LLVY-MCA as substrate measured for 1 hr by fluorescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-25, Volume: 146Ridaifen-F conjugated with cell-penetrating peptides inhibits intracellular proteasome activities and induces drug-resistant cell death.
AID1566919Resistance index, ratio of EC50 for erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 harboring 20S beta2 proteasome A117D mutant to EC50 erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium falciparum Dd22019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-11, Volume: 62, Issue:13
Improvement of Asparagine Ethylenediamines as Anti-malarial
AID354000Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of LMP7 immunoproteasome by proteasome active site ELISA2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-14, Volume: 52, Issue:9
Design and synthesis of an orally bioavailable and selective peptide epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor (PR-047).
AID496369Induction of OAS gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1473218Cell cycle arrest in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as accumulation at sub-G1 phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 12.25%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID599463Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of human erythrocyte 20S proteasome using Boc-LLR-AMC substrate incubated at 37 degC for 1 hr by fluorometric assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 19, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological evaluation of boron peptide analogues of Belactosin C as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1604182Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 1c (unknown origin) after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID1363844Inhibition of proteasome in human SEM cells assessed as increase in aggresome accumulation at 10 nM after 18 hrs by by FACS analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Discovery of the First-in-Class Dual Histone Deacetylase-Proteasome Inhibitor.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID452098Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of mouse liver 20S proteasome2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of tripeptide boronic acid proteasome inhibitors.
AID1687105Inhibition of human 20S constitutive proteasome beta 1 subunit caspase-like activity using fluorogenic peptide Ac-nLPnLD-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha incubated for 1 to 2 hrs by fluorescence microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID496321Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as expression of 3.5 and 2.1 kb HBV mRNA at 5 mg/kg, iv single dose after 24 hrs2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1372755Cytotoxicity against human MYCN2 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability at 0.1 to 1 uM after 24 hrs by MTT assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Immunoproteasome inhibition and bioactivity of thiasyrbactins.
AID496310Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as inhibition of HBV DNA replication at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 3 days by Southern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID496381Toxicity in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as labored breathing, hunched posture at 5 mg/kg, iv after 24 hrs2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1771375Antiproliferative activity against human MM1.S cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by XTT assay2021Journal of natural products, 08-27, Volume: 84, Issue:8
Structure-Activity Relationships of Withanolides as Antiproliferative Agents for Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Activity in 2D Models and a 3D Coculture Model.
AID496332Induction of TGTP gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv by RT- PCR2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1156408Growth inhibition of human PC3 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID316529Inhibition of human calpain 1 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID330780Cytotoxicity against mouse B16-F1 cells transfected with luciferase siRNA assessed as assessed as annexin 5 uptake at 100 nM after 24 hrs by flow cytometry2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-04, Volume: 104, Issue:49
Small molecule obatoclax (GX15-070) antagonizes MCL-1 and overcomes MCL-1-mediated resistance to apoptosis.
AID1484607Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 26S proteasome beta 5 subunit in human U266 cells using Suc-LLVY-aminoluciferin as substrate after 1 hr by Proteosome-Glo luminescence assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-28, Volume: 135Synthesis and antiproteasomal activity of novel O-benzyl salicylamide-based inhibitors built from leucine and phenylalanine.
AID459689Systemic clearance in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1443492Inhibition of chymotrypsin like activity of 26S proteasome derived from human MDA-MB-231 cells at 1 uM2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
First Bispecific Inhibitors of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase and the NF-κB Activity As Novel Anticancer Agents.
AID1566917Antimalarial activity against erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 harboring 20S beta2 proteasome A117D mutant measured after 72 hrs by SYBR green dye based fluorescence assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-11, Volume: 62, Issue:13
Improvement of Asparagine Ethylenediamines as Anti-malarial
AID1576776Inhibition of human 20S proteasome beta 5i preincubated for 1 hr followed by fluorescence based assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID1486825Selectivity ratio of IC50 for trypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells to IC50 for chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1459641Antiproliferative activity against human 95-D cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID316537Inhibition of human cathepsin L at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1818939Antiproliferative activity against human RPMI 8226 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by XTT assay2022Journal of natural products, 01-28, Volume: 85, Issue:1
Phytochemical Investigation of the Roots of
AID1141825Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like enzyme activity of purified human 20S proteasome using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate by fluorescence method2014Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jun-01, Volume: 22, Issue:11
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel tripeptidyl epoxyketone derivatives constructed from β-amino acid as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID706512Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 200 nM bortezonib-resistant human HT-29 cells harboring R24C prosequence mutation and proteosome subunit beta5 C63F mutant to IC50 for wild type human HT-29 cells measured after 3 days in absence of compound2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID316550Inhibition of human MMP3 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1825581Cytotoxicity in human bone marrow mononuclear cell assessed as total number of mononuclear cells at 50 nM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin V staining based flow cytometric analysis (Rvb =78.2%)2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-10, Volume: 65, Issue:3
Synthesis and Evaluation of Structurally Diverse C-2-Substituted Thienopyrimidine-Based Inhibitors of the Human Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase.
AID1584475Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells at 10 nM after 72 hrs in presence of GGOH by APC Annexin V/eFluor-780-viability double staining-based FACS analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Unraveling the Prenylation-Cancer Paradox in Multiple Myeloma with Novel Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase (GGPPS) Inhibitors.
AID1486821Cytotoxicity against human HL60 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1459643Antiproliferative activity against human HL60 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1312157Inhibition of Malassezia globosa beta-carbonic anhydrase preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID640521Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human DLD1 cells transfected with 4Ub-Luc gene using Succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate after 6 hrs by spectrofluorometric analysis2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 20, Issue:2
Semisynthetic neoboutomellerone derivatives as ubiquitin-proteasome pathway inhibitors.
AID459688Volume of distribution in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1128232Inhibition of human HCT116 cell growth2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID316546Inhibition of HIV1 protease at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1584468Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as necrotic cells at 10 nM after 72 hrs by APC Annexin V/eFluor-780-viability double staining-based FACS analysis (Rvb = 3.60%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Unraveling the Prenylation-Cancer Paradox in Multiple Myeloma with Novel Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase (GGPPS) Inhibitors.
AID1439183Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate by fluorescence assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel non-peptide boronic acid derivatives as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1484608Inhibition of trypsin like activity of 26S proteasome beta 2 subunit in human U266 cells assessed as residual activity using Z-LLE-AMC as substrate at 10 uM preincubated for 1 hr followed by substrate addition and measured after 4 hrs by fluorescence assa2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-28, Volume: 135Synthesis and antiproteasomal activity of novel O-benzyl salicylamide-based inhibitors built from leucine and phenylalanine.
AID1460769Inhibition of human CA5B by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID1548262Antiproliferative activity against human GES-1 cells incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay
AID1486822Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Suc-LLVYaminoluciferin as substrate pretreated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition by fluorescence assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1396606Cytotoxicity against human ARH77 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 aqueous one solution assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID548704Cytotoxicity against human HL60 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1473234Cell cycle arrest in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as accumulation at sub-G1 phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 5.59%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1604186Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 5c (unknown origin) after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID496359Induction of IL-1alpha gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1156373Growth inhibition of human HCT116 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1372744Inhibition of 20s constitutive proteasome chymotrypsin-like activity in human erythrocytes using Suc-LLVY-Glo as substrate pretreated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition measured after 10 mins by luminescence assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Immunoproteasome inhibition and bioactivity of thiasyrbactins.
AID540212Mean residence time in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID548699Cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID496378Induction of IL-3 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1156389Growth inhibition of human SK-MEL-28 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496330Induction of ISG15 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv by RT- PCR2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1473258Induction of apoptosis in human U266 cells at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1687133Inhibition of human 20S constitutive proteasome beta 1 subunit assessed as inhibition of BMV037 probe labeling at 1 to 10 uM incubated for 1 hr by SDS-PAGE analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID526548Inhibition of human coagulation factor beta 12a at 100 uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1156371Growth inhibition of human COLO205 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID706482Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human THP1 cells at 100 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1624032Inhibition of Caspase-3 (unknown origin) at 10 ug/mL using AC-DEVD-AMC as substrate by fluorescence assay relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID706739Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 30 nM bortezonib-resistant human SW1573 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 C52F mutant to IC50 for wild type human SW1573 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID496311Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as inhibition of HBV DNA replication at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 6 days by Southern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1623361Cell cycle arrest in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as accumulation at G0/G1 phase at 2 nM after 48 hrs by propidium iodide/RNase staining based flow cytometric method relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID1156392Growth inhibition of human UACC62 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID316557Inhibition of human caspase 7 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID353301Inhibition of peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolyzing activity of human 20S proteasome2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8
Synthesis of boronic acid derivatives of tyropeptin: proteasome inhibitors.
AID1903224Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-Leu Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition measured by fluorescence assay2022European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-05, Volume: 233Metabolism guided optimization of peptidomimetics as non-covalent proteasome inhibitors for cancer treatment.
AID316551Inhibition of human MMP7 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1448881Antiproliferative activity against human MCF7 cells after 3 days by SRB assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-22, Volume: 60, Issue:12
Identification of a Water-Soluble Indirubin Derivative as Potent Inhibitor of Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor through Structural Modification of the Parent Natural Molecule.
AID1156399Growth inhibition of human SKOV3 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1486823Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Z-LRRaminoluciferin as substrate pretreated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition by fluorescence assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID316534Inhibition of human cathepsin G at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID316547Inhibition of human plasma kallikrein at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID781077Cytotoxicity against human RPMI8226 cells after 48 to 72 hrs by SRB assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-01, Volume: 23, Issue:23
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of bone-targeted proteasome inhibitors for multiple myeloma.
AID1156362Growth inhibition of human A549/ATCC cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID548698Cytotoxicity against human BxPC3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1484603Inhibition of chymotrypsin like activity of 26S proteasome beta 5 subunit in human U266 cells assessed as residual activity using N-Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate at 10 uM preincubated for 1 hr followed by substrate addition and measured after 4 hrs by fluores2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-28, Volume: 135Synthesis and antiproteasomal activity of novel O-benzyl salicylamide-based inhibitors built from leucine and phenylalanine.
AID1895436Inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta-2i subunit using Ac-RLR-AMC as substrate preincubated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence intensity assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID1576793Cytotoxicity against anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated human CD4-positive T cells with CRISP/CAS9 20S proteasome beta 5i knockout assessed as reduction in cell viability measured on day 8 by CellTiter Glo assay relative to control2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID1252358Antiproliferative activity against human RPMI8266 cells after 72 hrs by oxyluciferin luminescence assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 25, Issue:21
Structure-activity relationship study of syringolin A as a potential anticancer agent.
AID452101Cytotoxicity against human HL60 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of tripeptide boronic acid proteasome inhibitors.
AID1372747Inhibition of immunoproteasome chymotrypsin-like activity in human erythrocytes using Suc-LLVY-Glo as substrate pretreated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition measured after 10 mins by luminescence assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Immunoproteasome inhibition and bioactivity of thiasyrbactins.
AID1576779Inhibition of human 20S proteasome beta 1i2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID706497Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human THP1 cells at 30 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1295430Cytotoxicity against human RPMI8226 cells assessed as cell viability after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 aqueous one solution cell proliferation assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
3D-QSAR-aided design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors and mechanism studies.
AID548710Terminal half life in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1864385Cytotoxicity against HEK293 cells at less than 20 uM incubated for 24 hrs2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-22, Volume: 65, Issue:18
Discovery of a Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor to Block NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation with Anti-inflammation Activity.
AID526414Cytotoxicity against human Calu6 cells assessed as cellular ATP level after 72 hrs by luminescence-based ATPlite assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1480597Antiproliferative activity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by Cell Titer-Glo assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-23, Volume: 60, Issue:4
Discovery of an Inhibitor of the Proteasome Subunit Rpn11.
AID1459639Antiproliferative activity against human MGC803 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1486824Inhibition of PGPH-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Z-nLPnLDaminoluciferin as substrate pretreated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition by fluorescence assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1543662Antiproliferative activity against human PC3 cells incubated for 72 hrs by CellTiter-Glo luminescence assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-15, Volume: 168Discovery of novel triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazin-3-yl-quinoline derivatives as PIM inhibitors.
AID496346Induction of TNFbeta gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID611892Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome using suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate preincubated for 10 mins before substrate addition at pH 2.0 by fluorescence assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13
Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors.
AID1372749Inhibition of immunoproteasome trypsin-like activity in human erythrocytes using Z-nLPnLD-Glo as substrate pretreated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition measured after 10 mins by luminescence assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Immunoproteasome inhibition and bioactivity of thiasyrbactins.
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID706477Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human HBL2-BR cells at 100 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID706485Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human NAMALWA cells at 12.5 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1156406Growth inhibition of human TK10 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID706514Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 100 nM bortezonib-resistant human HT-29 cells harboring R24C prosequence mutation and proteosome subunit beta5 C63F mutant to IC50 for wild type human HT-29 cells measured after 3 days in absence of compound2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID706505Effect on PSMB5 mRNA expression in human THP1 cells at 50 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1156398Growth inhibition of human NCI-ADR-RES cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1156391Growth inhibition of human UACC257 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1764783Inhibition of human erythrocytes 20S proteasome using QXL520-YRGITCSGRQK(5-FAM)-NH2 fluorogenic peptide as substrate preincubated for 10 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 60 mins by HTRF assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-22, Volume: 64, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design of Selective LONP1 Inhibitors for Probing
AID761481Cytotoxicity against bortezomib-resistant human THP1 cells assessed as cell viability at 0.5 uM after 72 hrs by MTS assay relative to vehicle-treated control2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-25, Volume: 56, Issue:14
Inhibition of the human proteasome by imidazoline scaffolds.
AID1459662Antitumor activity against human Bel7404 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 3 of compound dosing relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID496348Induction of TNFbeta gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1614000Inhibition of human hepatic cell derived 20s constitutive proteasome beta2 trypsin-like activity using Suc-LLE-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Exploration of novel macrocyclic dipeptide N-benzyl amides as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496379Induction of IL-3 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1459701Toxicity in human Bel7404 cells xenografted BALB/c mouse assessed as effect on body weight at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 20 of compound dosing (Rvb = 26.43 +/- 0.94 g)2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1566920Resistance index, ratio of EC50 for erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 harboring 20S beta5 proteasome A49S mutant to EC50 erythrocytic stage of Plasmodium falciparum Dd22019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-11, Volume: 62, Issue:13
Improvement of Asparagine Ethylenediamines as Anti-malarial
AID1604190Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 5c (unknown origin) to IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 5i (unknown origin)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID1459686Toxicity in human Bel7404 cells xenografted BALB/c mouse assessed as effect on body weight at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 3 of compound dosing (Rvb = 25.39 +/- 1 g)2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1771373Antiproliferative activity against human MM1.R cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by XTT assay2021Journal of natural products, 08-27, Volume: 84, Issue:8
Structure-Activity Relationships of Withanolides as Antiproliferative Agents for Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Activity in 2D Models and a 3D Coculture Model.
AID1584467Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as late apoptotic cells at 10 nM after 72 hrs by APC Annexin V/eFluor-780-viability double staining-based FACS analysis (Rvb = 5.80%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Unraveling the Prenylation-Cancer Paradox in Multiple Myeloma with Novel Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase (GGPPS) Inhibitors.
AID1156381Growth inhibition of human SNB19 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID706722Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for bortezonib-resistant human OPM2 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49T mutant to IC50 for wild type human OPM2 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID353302Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-15, Volume: 19, Issue:8
Synthesis of boronic acid derivatives of tyropeptin: proteasome inhibitors.
AID540209Volume of distribution at steady state in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1871278Cytotoxicity against human HEK293 cells assessed as cell growth inhibition2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 210Renieramycin-type alkaloids from marine-derived organisms: Synthetic chemistry, biological activity and structural modification.
AID1895457Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells assessed as depletion of ATP content up to 500 uM incubated for 48 to 72 hrs by CellTiter-Glo luminescent assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID732585Inhibition of presenilin-dependent gamma secretase complex in HEK293 solubilized membranes using Flag-C100 as substrate assessed as inhibition of amyloid beta40/42 production at 60 uM after 16 hrs by Western blotting analysis2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 21, Issue:4
Further characterization of a putative serine protease contributing to the γ-secretase cleavage of β-amyloid precursor protein.
AID1363798Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human SEM cells using Suc-LLVY aminoluciferin as substrate after 2 hrs by proteasome-Glo assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Discovery of the First-in-Class Dual Histone Deacetylase-Proteasome Inhibitor.
AID1156414Growth inhibition of human T47D cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID459661Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteosome assessed as hydrolysis of fluorogenic Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC substrate2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1460765Inhibition of human CA2 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID1825585Cytotoxicity in human bone marrow mononuclear cell assessed as apoptotic cells at 50 nM measured after 72 hrs by Annexin V staining based flow cytometric analysis (Rvb = 21.7%)2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-10, Volume: 65, Issue:3
Synthesis and Evaluation of Structurally Diverse C-2-Substituted Thienopyrimidine-Based Inhibitors of the Human Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase.
AID316578Protein binding in mouse plasma2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1473227Cell cycle arrest in human U266 cells assessed as accumulation at G0/G1 phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 40.29%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1771372Antiproliferative activity against human RPMI-8226 cells cultured as 3D-spheroids assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by Celltiter-Glo assay2021Journal of natural products, 08-27, Volume: 84, Issue:8
Structure-Activity Relationships of Withanolides as Antiproliferative Agents for Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Activity in 2D Models and a 3D Coculture Model.
AID706478Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human JEKO-BR cells at 100 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1548302Induction of cell cycle arrest in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as accumulation at G2/M phase at 100 nM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 9.1%)
AID1484624Inhibition of proteasome in human U266 cells assessed as increase in accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins by Western blot analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-28, Volume: 135Synthesis and antiproteasomal activity of novel O-benzyl salicylamide-based inhibitors built from leucine and phenylalanine.
AID1624030Inhibition of MMP12 (unknown origin) at 10 ug/mL using Ac-Pro-Leu-Gly-[(S)-2-mercapto-4-methyl-pentanoyl]-Leu-Gly-Oet as substrate relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID706490Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human H460 cells at 200 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1156411Growth inhibition of human MDA-MB-231 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1128516Inhibition of cathepsin B (unknown origin) assessed as Cbz-Phe-Arg-AMC substrate hydrolysis2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Identification of a new series of amides as non-covalent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1623369Induction of apoptosis in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as late apoptotic cells at 2 nM after 48 hrs by Annexin-V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric method (Rvb = 0.23%)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID548703Cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1325773Inhibition of chymotrypsin like activity of mouse spleen 20S proteasome beta5i subunit using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition measured after 2 hrs by fluorescence-based assay
AID539018Inhibition of NF-kappaB activity in TNF-alpha-induced human HEK293 cells after 30 mins by luciferase assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Dec-01, Volume: 18, Issue:23
Rubiyunnanins C-H, cytotoxic cyclic hexapeptides from Rubia yunnanensis inhibiting nitric oxide production and NF-κB activation.
AID316576Metabolic stability in dog liver microsomes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1623368Induction of apoptosis in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as early apoptotic cells at 2 nM after 48 hrs by Annexin-V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric method (Rvb = 17.1%)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID548716Mean residence time (0-t) in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID734754Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome beta 5 subunit using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Potent proteasome inhibitors derived from the unnatural cis-cyclopropane isomer of Belactosin A: synthesis, biological activity, and mode of action.
AID1895441Selectivity ratio of IC50 for inhibition of human 20S proteasome beta5 subunit to IC50 for inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta-5i subunit2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID1156361Growth inhibition of human SR cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID526416Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20s proteasome beta2 subunit in human erythrocyte assessed as hydrolysis of Ac-WLA-AMC fluorogenic substrate2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1605096Inhibition of N-terminal His6-sumo-tagged full length Staphylococcus aureus ClpP expressed in Escherichia coli BL2 (DE3) pre-incubated for 10 mins before Suc-LY-AMC addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1156376Growth inhibition of human KM12 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1473228Cell cycle arrest in human U266 cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 14.05%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID496380Induction of IL-3 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID459691Toxicity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as mortality at 1 mg/kg, iv after 10 hrs2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1623412Cytotoxicity against human RPMI8226 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability at 2 nM after 48 hrs by CCK8 assay relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID496350Induction of IL-4 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID548706Tmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1460775Inhibition of human CA14 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID459682Systemic clearance in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1764782Inhibition of LONP1 (unknown origin) using QXL520-YRGITCSGRQK(5-FAM)-NH2 peptide as substrate incubated for 50 mins in presence of ATP by HTRF assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-22, Volume: 64, Issue:8
Structure-Based Design of Selective LONP1 Inhibitors for Probing
AID1459658Half life in Sprague-Dawley rat at 0.8 mg/kg, iv administered as bolus2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID706494Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human THP1 cells at 200 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1156410Growth inhibition of human MCF7 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID316520Half life in CD1 mouse at 4 mg/kg, po2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1252356Antiproliferative activity against human TOV21G cells after 72 hrs by oxyluciferin luminescence assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 25, Issue:21
Structure-activity relationship study of syringolin A as a potential anticancer agent.
AID1480598Antiproliferative activity against human 293T cells after 72 hrs by Cell Titer-Glo assay2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-23, Volume: 60, Issue:4
Discovery of an Inhibitor of the Proteasome Subunit Rpn11.
AID611891Inhibition of proteasome in mouse tumor cells relative to inhibition in blood cells2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13
Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors.
AID1453444Inhibition of recombinant human C-MYC/DDK-tagged ENGase expressed in HEK293T cells at 100 uM using heat inactivated bovine ribonuclease B as substrate pretreated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition after 90 mins by SDS-PAGE analysis2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 07-01, Volume: 27, Issue:13
Repurposing of Proton Pump Inhibitors as first identified small molecule inhibitors of endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (ENGase) for the treatment of NGLY1 deficiency, a rare genetic disease.
AID1687128Antiplasmodial activity against sorbitol synchronized ring stage bortezomib-resistant Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 clone B2a assessed as reduction in parasitemia incubated for 72 hrs by Syto-61 staining dye based flow cytometry analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1312154Inhibition of Candida albicans beta-carbonic anhydrase preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID526413Inhibition of TNF-alpha-induced NF-kappaB activation in human HEK293 cells after 3 hrs by luciferase reporter gene assay2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1112954Inhibition of NF-kappaB-mediated viral replication in Homo sapiens (human) U1 cells infected with X4 tropic HIV1 NL4-3 at 10 uM after 24 hr by RT-PCR analysis in presence of TNF-alpha2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-01, Volume: 23, Issue:3
Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by a tricyclic coumarin GUT-70 in acutely and chronically infected cells.
AID1687122Selectivity index, ratio of LD50 for cytotoxicity against human HepG2 cells to LD50 for antiplasmodial activity against Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 sorbitol-treated ring stage2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID706475Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human HT-29 cells at 200 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1128231Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Ac-RLR-AMC as substrate2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID316544Inhibition of human factor 7a at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1443491Inhibition of trypsin like activity of 26S proteasome derived from human MDA-MB-231 cells at 1 uM2017Journal of medicinal chemistry, 04-13, Volume: 60, Issue:7
First Bispecific Inhibitors of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase and the NF-κB Activity As Novel Anticancer Agents.
AID706728Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for human Jurkat B2 cells harboring silent mutation and proteosome subunit beta5 A49T heterozygous mutant to IC50 for wild type human Jurkat cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1325770Inhibition of chymotrypsin like activity of rabbit 20S proteasome using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition measured after 2 hrs by fluorescence-based assay
AID1548270Inhibition of proteasome in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as increase in polyubiquitinated proteins accumulation at 10 to 1000 nM incubated for 24 hrs Western blotting analysis
AID496351Induction of IL-4 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID316541Inhibition of human chymase2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1197986Induction of cell death in human A549 cells assessed as stabilization of p53 at 0.025 to 0.5 uM after 24 hrs by immunoblot assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 58, Issue:4
Synthesis, characterization, and optimization for in vivo delivery of a nonselective isopeptidase inhibitor as new antineoplastic agent.
AID1818944Antiproliferative activity against dexamethasone-resistant human MM.1R cells assessed as reduction in cell viability at 10 uM measured after 72 hrs by XTT assay2022Journal of natural products, 01-28, Volume: 85, Issue:1
Phytochemical Investigation of the Roots of
AID1623350Cytotoxicity against human RPMI8226 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability at 2 nM after 48 hrs by CCK8 assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID1128513Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome beta 5 subunit assessed as Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC substrate hydrolysis at 20 uM after 10 mins by fluorometric analysis2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Identification of a new series of amides as non-covalent proteasome inhibitors.
AID548697Inhibition of human 20S proteasome chymotrypsin-like activity by fluorimetric assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID459678Mean residence time in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID459679AUC (0 to t) in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1156400Growth inhibition of human 786-0 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID548715AUC (0-t) in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID548719Systemic clearance in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1128244Reversible inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate measured after drug wash-out2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID316556Inhibition of human caspase 3 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID316579Protein binding in rat plasma2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1375834Cytotoxicity against human SKOV3 cells assessed as decrease in cell viability after 4 days by CellTiter-Glo assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 06-14, Volume: 61, Issue:11
Discovery of Orally Bioavailable, Quinoline-Based Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) Inhibitors with Potent Cellular Activity.
AID1382146Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Boc-LRR-MCA as substrate measured for 1 hr by fluorescence assay2018European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-25, Volume: 146Ridaifen-F conjugated with cell-penetrating peptides inhibits intracellular proteasome activities and induces drug-resistant cell death.
AID1548273Induction of cell cycle arrest in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 100 nM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 23.5%)
AID1864382Inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in LPS-primed mouse J774.A1 cells assessed as reduction in IL-1beta secretion preincubated for 1 hr followed by nigericin stimulation and measured after 1 hr by ELISA2022Journal of medicinal chemistry, 09-22, Volume: 65, Issue:18
Discovery of a Novel Oral Proteasome Inhibitor to Block NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation with Anti-inflammation Activity.
AID1614003Inhibition of human peripheral blood derived 20s immunoproteasome beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity using Suc-PAL-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Exploration of novel macrocyclic dipeptide N-benzyl amides as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1687124Antiplasmodial activity against DHA-sensitive and sorbitol synchronized ring stage forms of Plasmodium falciparum Cam3.II^rev expressing K13 wild-type genotype assessed as reduction in parasitemia incubated for 3 hrs by pulse exposure based Syto-61 staini2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID526412Binding affinity to chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1548263Antiproliferative activity against human HL7702 cells incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay
AID1459653Antitumor activity against human Bel7404 cells xenografted in BALB/c nude mouse assessed as effect on tumor volume at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 1 of compound dosing relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID611899Ratio of CC50 for human follicular small-cell lymphocytic leukemia cells to IC50 for intracellular chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HEK293 cells2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13
Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors.
AID599471Cell cycle arrest in human HeLa cells assessed as accumulation at G1 phase at 0.1 uM after 24 hrs by flow cytometry (Rvb = 56.4 +/- 0.39%)2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 19, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological evaluation of boron peptide analogues of Belactosin C as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1895440Inhibition of human 20S proteasome beta5 subunit using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate preincubated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence intensity assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID1484612Inhibition of caspase like activity of 26S proteasome beta 1 subunit in human U266 cells assessed as residual activity using Bz-VGR-AMC as substrate at 10 uM preincubated for 1 hr followed by substrate addition and measured after 4 hrs by fluorescence ass2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-28, Volume: 135Synthesis and antiproteasomal activity of novel O-benzyl salicylamide-based inhibitors built from leucine and phenylalanine.
AID1325774Inhibition of bovine alpha chymotrypsin using Ala-Ala-Phe-7-AMC as substrate measured for 10 mins by spectrophotometric analysis
AID1473219Cell cycle arrest in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as accumulation at G0/G1 phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 44.67%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID316519Clearance in CD1 mouse at 0.8 mg/kg, iv2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID599462Inhibition of caspase-like activity of human erythrocyte 20S proteasome using Z-LLE-AMC substrate incubated at 37 degC for 1 hr by fluorometric assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 19, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological evaluation of boron peptide analogues of Belactosin C as proteasome inhibitors.
AID611893Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome using suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate preincubated for 10 mins before substrate addition at pH 7.6 by fluorescence assay2011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13
Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors.
AID781078Cytotoxicity against mouse 5TGM1 cells after 48 to 72 hrs by SRB assay2013Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Dec-01, Volume: 23, Issue:23
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of bone-targeted proteasome inhibitors for multiple myeloma.
AID1689691Inhibition of HDAC1 in human RPMI-8226 cells incubated for 2 hrs by ELISA2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 1891,2,3-Triazole-Chalcone hybrids: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity and mechanistic investigation of apoptosis induction in multiple myeloma RPMI-8226.
AID1687125Inhibition of proteasome in Plasmodium falciparum trophozoite stage transfected with GFP-DD assessed as reduction in GFP-DD fusion protein degradation at 0.02 to 0.5 uM incubated for 3 hrs in absence of Shield-1 by Western blot analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1473221Cell cycle arrest in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as accumulation at G2/M phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 23.94%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1584465Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as viable cells at 10 nM after 72 hrs by APC Annexin V/eFluor-780-viability double staining-based FACS analysis (Rvb = 87.3%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-09, Volume: 61, Issue:15
Unraveling the Prenylation-Cancer Paradox in Multiple Myeloma with Novel Geranylgeranyl Pyrophosphate Synthase (GGPPS) Inhibitors.
AID706503Effect on PSMB5 mRNA expression in human THP1 cells at 200 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID496313Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as expression of 3.5 and 2.1 kb HBV mRNA at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 2 days by Northern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1325783Cytotoxicity against human U266 cells harboring mutant p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID1459633Inhibition of caspase-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Z-nLPnLDaminoluciferin as substrate at 0.2 uM after 2 hrs by fluorescence analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID706498Effect on PSMB5 mRNA expression in human RPMI8226 cells at 7 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1156397Growth inhibition of human OVCAR8 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1459637Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Suc-LLVYaminoluciferin as substrate after 2 hrs by fluorescence analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1818941Antiproliferative activity against dexamethasone-resistant human MM.1R cells assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by XTT assay2022Journal of natural products, 01-28, Volume: 85, Issue:1
Phytochemical Investigation of the Roots of
AID1156372Growth inhibition of human HCC2998 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1614001Inhibition of human peripheral blood derived 20s immunoproteasome beta1 caspase-like activity using Suc-PAL-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition and measured after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Exploration of novel macrocyclic dipeptide N-benzyl amides as proteasome inhibitors.
AID330775Cytotoxicity against mouse B16-F1 cells transfected with MCL1 siRNA assessed as assessed as annexin 5 uptake at 100 nM after 24 hrs by flow cytometry2007Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Dec-04, Volume: 104, Issue:49
Small molecule obatoclax (GX15-070) antagonizes MCL-1 and overcomes MCL-1-mediated resistance to apoptosis.
AID1137838Inhibition of immunoproteasome 20S subunit beta5i in human Karpas 1106p cell extract at 1 nM2014ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Apr-10, Volume: 5, Issue:4
Oxathiazolones Selectively Inhibit the Human Immunoproteasome over the Constitutive Proteasome.
AID1250153Cytotoxicity against human Glioma cells (HF3013) after 72 hrs by CelltiterGlo assay2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
High-Throughput Screening of Patient-Derived Cultures Reveals Potential for Precision Medicine in Glioblastoma.
AID526654Selectivity ratio of IC50 for cathepsin to IC50 for proteasome2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Oct-14, Volume: 53, Issue:19
Toward the development of innovative bifunctional agents to induce differentiation and to promote apoptosis in leukemia: clinical candidates and perspectives.
AID1156369Growth inhibition of human NCI-H460 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1486816Cytotoxicity against human A549 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-01, Volume: 25, Issue:15
Synthesis and biological activity of peptide proline-boronic acids as proteasome inhibitors.
AID706496Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human THP1 cells at 50 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID316564Inhibition of bacterial prolyl oligopeptidase at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1459648Antiproliferative activity against human SW1990 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1576785Cytotoxicity against human pDC assessed as reduction in cell viability by CellTiter Glo assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID316569Inhibition of human trypsin at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1473257Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1156405Growth inhibition of human SN12C cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1325779Cytotoxicity against p53 deficient human SKOV3 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID316500Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome in Molt4 cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1548260Antiproliferative activity against human KM3 cells incubated for 48 hrs by MTT assay
AID1252354Antiproliferative activity against human HCT116 cells after 72 hrs by oxyluciferin luminescence assay2015Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 25, Issue:21
Structure-activity relationship study of syringolin A as a potential anticancer agent.
AID1299917Inhibition of human liver cathepsin B using Cbz-RR-AMC as substrate at 100 uM by fluorometric assay2016ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-10, Volume: 7, Issue:3
Synthesis and Evaluation of Macrocyclic Peptide Aldehydes as Potent and Selective Inhibitors of the 20S Proteasome.
AID1439190Metabolic stability in Sprague-Dawley rat liver microsomes assessed as compound remaining at 20 uM preincubated for 5 mins followed by NADPH addition measured after 20 mins by HPLC analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel non-peptide boronic acid derivatives as proteasome inhibitors.
AID459684Cmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1473264Antitumor activity against human RPMI8226 cells xenografted in nude mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 1 mg/kg, iv or ip administered once in week for 35 days relative to control2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1689692Inhibition of HDAC2 in human RPMI-8226 cells incubated for 2 hrs by ELISA2020European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-01, Volume: 1891,2,3-Triazole-Chalcone hybrids: Synthesis, in vitro cytotoxic activity and mechanistic investigation of apoptosis induction in multiple myeloma RPMI-8226.
AID496338Toxicity in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver assessed as hepatitis at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 6 days by rotine immunohistochemistry method2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID496315Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as expression of 3.5 and 2.1 kb HBV mRNA at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 6 days by Northern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1605099Induction of hemolysis in sheep erythrocytes by measuring hemoglobin release incubated for 15 mins2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1295432Cytotoxicity against human U266B1 cells assessed as cell viability after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 aqueous one solution cell proliferation assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 06-01, Volume: 24, Issue:11
3D-QSAR-aided design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors and mechanism studies.
AID397951Cytotoxicity against human H460 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID1325778Cytotoxicity against human KGN cells harboring wild type p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID1250147Cytotoxicity against human Glioma cells (HF2303) after 72 hrs by CelltiterGlo assay2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
High-Throughput Screening of Patient-Derived Cultures Reveals Potential for Precision Medicine in Glioblastoma.
AID1895438Inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta1 subunit using Ac-nLPnLD-AMC as substrate preincubated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence intensity assay2021Journal of medicinal chemistry, 07-22, Volume: 64, Issue:14
Structure-Based Optimization and Discovery of M3258, a Specific Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i).
AID459692Toxicity in Sprague-Dawley rat assessed as mortality at 1 mg/kg, ig after 10 hrs2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1372746Inhibition of 20s constitutive proteasome trypsin-like activity in human erythrocytes using Z-nLPnLD-Glo as substrate pretreated for 2 hrs followed by substrate addition measured after 10 mins by luminescence assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Immunoproteasome inhibition and bioactivity of thiasyrbactins.
AID316533Inhibition of human cathepsin E at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1396605Cytotoxicity against human U266B1 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability after 72 hrs by CellTiter 96 aqueous one solution assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 08-07, Volume: 26, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, in vitro and in vivo evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of novel dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors as orally available anti-cancer agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma and mechanism stud
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID761488Inhibition of chymotryptic-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate measured every min over 30 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-25, Volume: 56, Issue:14
Inhibition of the human proteasome by imidazoline scaffolds.
AID599476Induction of apoptosis in human HeLa cells at 0.1 uM incubated for 12 hrs using annexin V-FITC and propidiun iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 2.6 +/- 0.14%)2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jun-15, Volume: 19, Issue:12
Synthesis and biological evaluation of boron peptide analogues of Belactosin C as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1250151Cytotoxicity against human Glioma cells (HF2876) after 72 hrs by CelltiterGlo assay2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
High-Throughput Screening of Patient-Derived Cultures Reveals Potential for Precision Medicine in Glioblastoma.
AID1815775Cytotoxicity against human HeLa cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2022ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-13, Volume: 13, Issue:1
The BASHY Platform Enables the Assembly of a Fluorescent Bortezomib-GV1001 Conjugate.
AID611898Ratio of CC50 for human follicular small-cell lymphocytic leukemia cells to IC50 for chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome at pH 2.02011Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-14, Volume: 54, Issue:13
Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors.
AID1156379Growth inhibition of human SF295 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1604189Selectivity index, ratio of IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 2c (unknown origin) to IC50 for 20S proteasome beta 2i (unknown origin)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Nov-15, Volume: 182Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases.
AID430821Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of proteasome in human HL60 cells at 100 nM2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-27, Volume: 52, Issue:16
Synthetic analogue of rocaglaol displays a potent and selective cytotoxicity in cancer cells: involvement of apoptosis inducing factor and caspase-12.
AID496339Toxicity in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver assessed as hepatitis at 0.2 mg/kg, iv single dose after 24 hrs by rotine immunohistochemistry method2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID548711Apparent volume of distribution in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID734752Inhibition of trypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome beta 2 subunit using Ac-RLR-AMC as substrate after 60 mins by fluorescence assay2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, May-09, Volume: 56, Issue:9
Potent proteasome inhibitors derived from the unnatural cis-cyclopropane isomer of Belactosin A: synthesis, biological activity, and mode of action.
AID459664Cytotoxicity against human BxPC3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID316521AUC (0 to infinity) in CD1 mouse at 4 mg/kg, po2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1460764Inhibition of human CA1 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID1624026Inhibition of human 20s constitutive proteasome beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID496372Induction of OAS gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 6 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID496365Induction of IL-2 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID706510Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 200 nM bortezonib-resistant human H460 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49T mutant to IC50 for wild type human H460 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1623398Induction of apoptosis in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as necrotic cells at 3 nM after 48 hrs by Annexin-V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric method (Rvb = 0.090%)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID1156360Growth inhibition of human RPMI8226 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID540210Clearance in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1548285Induction of apoptosis in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as early apoptotic cells level at 50 nM incubated for 24 hrs by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining based FCAS analysis (Rvb = 1.39%)
AID496337Toxicity in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver assessed as hepatitis at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 2 days by rotine immunohistochemistry method2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1128237Inhibition of recombinant cathepsin B (unknown origin) using Z-Leu-Arg-AMC as substrate by spectrofluorometer analysis2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID706726Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for human Jurkat B cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 A49T mutant to IC50 for wild type human Jurkat cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1459647Antiproliferative activity against human MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1128517Cytotoxicity against human NCI60 cells at 10'-5 M2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Identification of a new series of amides as non-covalent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1266946Antitumor activity against human AMO1 cells xenografted in nude SCID beige mouse assessed as tumor growth inhibition at 1 mg/kg, iv administered twice per week2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-24, Volume: 58, Issue:24
Discovery of a First-in-Class, Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable Inhibitor of the p97 AAA ATPase (CB-5083).
AID1374301Antiproliferative activity against human MCF7 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 03-01, Volume: 26, Issue:5
Novel aromatic sulfonyl naphthalene-based boronates as 20S proteasome inhibitors.
AID459668Cytotoxicity against human SKOV3 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1312153Inhibition of human carbonic anhydrase-2 preincubated for 15 mins by stopped-flow CO2 hydration assay2016Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 09-15, Volume: 24, Issue:18
Bortezomib inhibits bacterial and fungal β-carbonic anhydrases.
AID623565Cytotoxicity against human HT-29 cells after 3 days by sulforhodamine B assay2011Journal of natural products, Oct-28, Volume: 74, Issue:10
Bioassay-guided isolation of constituents of Piper sarmentosum using a mitochondrial transmembrane potential assay.
AID1439182Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome at 100 nM using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate by fluorescence assay relative to control2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-10, Volume: 128Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel non-peptide boronic acid derivatives as proteasome inhibitors.
AID397955Cytotoxicity against human HeLa cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID496314Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as expression of 3.5 and 2.1 kb HBV mRNA at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 3 days by Northern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID52603Inhibitory activity against human Chymotrypsinogen1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-17, Volume: 8, Issue:4
Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: dipeptidyl boronic acids.
AID1818943Antiproliferative activity against dexamethasone-sensitive human MM.1S cells assessed as reduction in cell viability at 10 uM measured after 72 hrs by XTT assay2022Journal of natural products, 01-28, Volume: 85, Issue:1
Phytochemical Investigation of the Roots of
AID1548284Induction of apoptosis in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as viable cells level at 50 nM incubated for 24 hrs by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining based FCAS analysis (Rvb = 98.1%)
AID1576775Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 5c (unknown origin) preincubated for 1 hr followed by fluorescence based assay2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID316531Inhibition of bovine cathepsin C at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID504303Inhibition of 20S proteasome2010Journal of natural products, Sep-24, Volume: 73, Issue:9
Cylindrocyclophanes with proteasome inhibitory activity from the Cyanobacterium Nostoc sp.
AID496357Induction of IL-1alpha gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID496336Toxicity in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver assessed as hepatitis at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 1 day by rotine immunohistochemistry method2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID459677Cmax in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID316523Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta5beta1 subunit binding in human RPMI 8226 cells xenografted mouse2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1325782Cytotoxicity against human NCI-H929 cells harboring wild type p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID700311Resistance ratio of IC50 for human bortezomib-resistant DOGUM cells to IC50 for human DOGUM cells2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Identification of a glutathione peroxidase inhibitor that reverses resistance to anticancer drugs in human B-cell lymphoma cell lines.
AID1460770Inhibition of human CA6 by stopped-flow CO2 hydrase assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Bortezomib inhibits mammalian carbonic anhydrases.
AID316555Inhibition of human caspase 2 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID526550Inhibition of human elastase at 100 uM2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1459642Antiproliferative activity against human HCT116 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1687115Binding affinity to human 20S constitutive proteasome beta 5 subunit assessed as half-life using fluorogenic peptide Ac-WLA-AMC as substrate in presence of PA28alpha by fluorescence based microplate reader assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1623371Induction of apoptosis in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as viable cells at 2 nM after 48 hrs by Annexin-V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric method (Rvb = 82.6%)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID1687119Antiplasmodial activity against sorbitol synchronized ring stage Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 assessed as reduction in parasitemia incubated for 72 hrs by Syto-61 staining dye based flow cytometry analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1623370Induction of apoptosis in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as necrotic cells at 2 nM after 48 hrs by Annexin-V/propidium iodide staining based flow cytometric method (Rvb = 0.0034%)2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Translational impact of novel widely pharmacological characterized mofezolac-derived COX-1 inhibitors combined with bortezomib on human multiple myeloma cell lines viability.
AID496309Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as inhibition of HBV DNA replication at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 2 days by Southern blot analysis2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1299909Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of rabbit 20S proteasome using Suc-LLVY-AMC substrate incubated at 37 degC by fluorometric assay2016ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Mar-10, Volume: 7, Issue:3
Synthesis and Evaluation of Macrocyclic Peptide Aldehydes as Potent and Selective Inhibitors of the 20S Proteasome.
AID1156413Growth inhibition of human BT549 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496370Induction of OAS gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID397952Cytotoxicity against human SW480 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID1459704Toxicity in human Bel7404 cells xenografted BALB/c mouse assessed as effect on body weight at 0.5 mg/kg, iv administered once in two days for 24 consecutive days measured on day 24 of compound dosing (Rvb = 26.29 +/- 1.36 g)2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID1325781Cytotoxicity against human MDA-MB-468 cells harboring mutant p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID1156374Growth inhibition of human HCT15 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID496373Induction of IL1-beta gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID526411Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20s proteasome beta5 subunit in human erythrocyte assessed as hydrolysis of Ac-WLA-AMC fluorogenic substrate2010Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-15, Volume: 20, Issue:22
Optimization of a series of dipeptides with a P3 threonine residue as non-covalent inhibitors of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the human 20S proteasome.
AID1548301Induction of cell cycle arrest in bortezomib resistant human KM3/BTZ cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 100 nM incubated for 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 46%)
AID540211Fraction unbound in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1687136Inhibition of human 20S immunoproteasome beta 5 subunit assessed as inhibition of BMV037 probe labeling at 1 to 10 uM incubated for 1 hr by SDS-PAGE analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID316575Metabolic stability in rat liver microsomes2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1667215Inhibition of human SET7 overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells at 12.5 uM preincubated for 15 mins followed by addition of SAM as substrate and biotinylated Histone H3 (1-50) peptide measured after 30 mins by AlphaLISA assay relative to contr2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-01, Volume: 28, Issue:7
Computational discovery and biological evaluation of novel inhibitors targeting histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SET7.
AID1667213Inhibition of human SET7 overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells at 50 uM preincubated for 15 mins followed by addition of SAM as substrate and biotinylated Histone H3 (1-50) peptide measured after 30 mins by AlphaLISA assay relative to control2020Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 04-01, Volume: 28, Issue:7
Computational discovery and biological evaluation of novel inhibitors targeting histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SET7.
AID1156409Growth inhibition of human DU145 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1728101Antiproliferative activity against human MDA-MB-231 cells assessed as cell viability after 24 hrs2021European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-15, Volume: 210Potent antiproliferative activity of bradykinin B2 receptor selective agonist FR-190997 and analogue structures thereof: A paradox resolved?
AID706504Effect on PSMB5 mRNA expression in human THP1 cells at 100 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID496334Induction of Usp18 gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 24 hrs by RT- PCR2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID316499Inhibition of bovine alpha chymotrypsin2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID706495Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 expression in human THP1 cells at 100 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1374300Antiproliferative activity against human MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 hrs by SRB assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 03-01, Volume: 26, Issue:5
Novel aromatic sulfonyl naphthalene-based boronates as 20S proteasome inhibitors.
AID397950Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20s proteasome beta 5 subunit assessed as hydrolysis of fluorogenic substrate2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID1474167Liver toxicity in human assessed as induction of drug-induced liver injury by measuring verified drug-induced liver injury concern status2016Drug discovery today, Apr, Volume: 21, Issue:4
DILIrank: the largest reference drug list ranked by the risk for developing drug-induced liver injury in humans.
AID1197991Induction of cell death in human A549 cells assessed as accumulation of Noxa at 0.025 to 0.1 uM after 24 hrs by immunoblot assay2015Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-26, Volume: 58, Issue:4
Synthesis, characterization, and optimization for in vivo delivery of a nonselective isopeptidase inhibitor as new antineoplastic agent.
AID496328Antiviral activity against HBV infected in 1.3.32 transgenic mouse assessed as serum HBeAg and HBsAg level at 1 mg/kg, iv single dose after 3 days2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1605095Inhibition of N-terminal His6-sumo-tagged full length Staphylococcus aureus ClpP expressed in Escherichia coli BL2 (DE3) at 10 uM pre-incubated for 10 mins before Suc-LY-AMC addition and measured after 1 hr by fluorescence based assay relative to control2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 03-26, Volume: 63, Issue:6
Discovery of Novel Peptidomimetic Boronate ClpP Inhibitors with Noncanonical Enzyme Mechanism as Potent Virulence Blockers
AID1815774Cytotoxicity against human HT-29 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 24 hrs by MTT assay2022ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-13, Volume: 13, Issue:1
The BASHY Platform Enables the Assembly of a Fluorescent Bortezomib-GV1001 Conjugate.
AID1128239Cell cycle arrest in human HCT116 cells assessed as accumulation at G1 phase at 100 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 35.6%)2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID1595606Selectivity ratio of IC50 for human NCI-H727 cells to IC50 for human NCI-H23 cells2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 05-09, Volume: 62, Issue:9
Development of Novel Epoxyketone-Based Proteasome Inhibitors as a Strategy To Overcome Cancer Resistance to Carfilzomib and Bortezomib.
AID1771374Antiproliferative activity against human RPMI 8226 cells assessed as reduction in cell viability incubated for 72 hrs by XTT assay2021Journal of natural products, 08-27, Volume: 84, Issue:8
Structure-Activity Relationships of Withanolides as Antiproliferative Agents for Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Activity in 2D Models and a 3D Coculture Model.
AID548717Terminal half life in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, iv2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1624027Inhibition of human 20s immunoproteasome beta5i activity using Suc-LLVY-AMC as substrate preincubated for 15 mins followed by substrate addition2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID316501Cytotoxicity against human A2780 cells2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID706499Effect on PSMB5 mRNA expression in human RPMI8226 cells at 100 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1461483Inhibition of caspase-like activity of 20S proteasome in rabbit 20S proteasome pre-incubated for 10 mins before Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC substrate addition and measured after 2 hrs by fluorescence assay2017Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 10-01, Volume: 25, Issue:19
Azobenzene-containing photoswitchable proteasome inhibitors with selective activity and cellular toxicity.
AID1473235Cell cycle arrest in human NCI-H929 cells assessed as accumulation at G0/G1 phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 49.39%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID1250149Cytotoxicity against human Glioma cells (HF2476) after 72 hrs by CelltiterGlo assay2015ACS medicinal chemistry letters, Aug-13, Volume: 6, Issue:8
High-Throughput Screening of Patient-Derived Cultures Reveals Potential for Precision Medicine in Glioblastoma.
AID1674413Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of Leishmania tarentolae proteasome beta 4 F24L mutant2020Journal of medicinal chemistry, 10-08, Volume: 63, Issue:19
Discovery and Characterization of Clinical Candidate LXE408 as a Kinetoplastid-Selective Proteasome Inhibitor for the Treatment of Leishmaniases.
AID452103Cytotoxicity against human BGC823 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, Oct-01, Volume: 17, Issue:19
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of tripeptide boronic acid proteasome inhibitors.
AID1156343Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human erythrocytes using Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC as substrate by fluorescence assay2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1576792Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 5i in human PBMC cells assessed as induction of PSMB7 expression at 100 nM after 3 to 72 hrs by RT-PCR method2019Journal of medicinal chemistry, 08-08, Volume: 62, Issue:15
Design and Evaluation of Highly Selective Human Immunoproteasome Inhibitors Reveal a Compensatory Process That Preserves Immune Cell Viability.
AID1687127Antiplasmodial activity against sorbitol synchronized ring stage bortezomib-resistant Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 clone B1a assessed as reduction in parasitemia incubated for 72 hrs by Syto-61 staining dye based flow cytometry analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1484604Antiproliferative activity against human K562 cells after 72 hrs by calcein AM staining based fluorescence assay2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-28, Volume: 135Synthesis and antiproteasomal activity of novel O-benzyl salicylamide-based inhibitors built from leucine and phenylalanine.
AID1459660Plasma clearance in Sprague-Dawley rat at 0.8 mg/kg, iv administered as bolus2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID471918Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of proteasome in human HL60 cells assessed as free AMC level after 10 mins2009Journal of natural products, Jun, Volume: 72, Issue:6
Bioactive 5,6-dihydro-alpha-pyrone derivatives from Hyptis brevipes.
AID548712Systemic clearance in Sprague-Dawley rat at 1 mg/kg, ig2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-23, Volume: 53, Issue:24
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, and comprehensive understanding of structure-activity relationships of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors constructed from β-amino acids.
AID1473226Cell cycle arrest in human U266 cells assessed as accumulation at sub-G1 phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 10.76%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID459674Toxicity against zebrafish embryo assessed as cell death in tail at 1 umol after 24 hrs2010Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-11, Volume: 53, Issue:5
Synthesis, in vitro and in vivo biological evaluation, docking studies, and structure--activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors composed of beta-amino acids.
AID1128230Inhibition of caspase-like activity of human 20S proteasome using Ac-nLPnLD-AMC as substrate2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID1687130Inhibition of 20S proteasome beta 5 subunit from bortezomib resistant Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 trophozoite infected erythrocytes assessed as inhibition of BMV037 probe labeling at 1 to 10 uM incubated for 1 hr by SDS-PAGE analysis2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Target Validation and Identification of Novel Boronate Inhibitors of the Plasmodium falciparum Proteasome.
AID1128234Inhibition of beta5 subunit of immunoproteasome (unknown origin) by active-site ELISA2014Journal of medicinal chemistry, Mar-27, Volume: 57, Issue:6
Structurally novel highly potent proteasome inhibitors created by the structure-based hybridization of nonpeptidic belactosin derivatives and peptide boronates.
AID316532Inhibition of human cathepsin D at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID496375Induction of IL1-beta gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 3 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID316535Inhibition of human cathepsin G2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1156401Growth inhibition of human A498 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1156359Growth inhibition of human MOLT4 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID316539Inhibition of human cathepsin Z at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID728731Inhibition of His-tagged Frataxin (unknown origin)/Ubiquitin interaction expressed in human Calu6 cells assessed as increase in frataxin (1-210) precursor level at 10 uM after 18 hrs by Western blotting analysis2013Journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-11, Volume: 56, Issue:7
Discovery of a novel small molecule inhibitor targeting the frataxin/ubiquitin interaction via structure-based virtual screening and bioassays.
AID496345Induction of TNF beta gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 1day by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1325785Cytotoxicity against human IMR90 cells harboring wild type p53 assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID397958Cytotoxicity against human BGC823 cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2009Journal of medicinal chemistry, Jul-23, Volume: 52, Issue:14
Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) discussion of dipeptidyl boronate proteasome inhibitors, part I: comprehensive understanding of the SAR of alpha-amino acid boronates.
AID1473220Cell cycle arrest in human RPMI8226 cells assessed as accumulation at S phase at 2.5 nM after 24 hrs by propidium iodide staining based flow cytometry (Rvb = 19.53%)2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 02-08, Volume: 61, Issue:3
(N-Hydroxycarbonylbenylamino)quinolines as Selective Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors Suppress Growth of Multiple Myeloma in Vitro and in Vivo.
AID316560Inhibition of human DPP4 at 10 uM2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID1363799Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in imatinib-resistant human SUP-B15 cells using Suc-LLVY aminoluciferin as substrate after 2 hrs by proteasome-Glo assay2018Journal of medicinal chemistry, 11-21, Volume: 61, Issue:22
Discovery of the First-in-Class Dual Histone Deacetylase-Proteasome Inhibitor.
AID1325777Cytotoxicity against human RD-ES cells harboring p53 mutant assessed as reduction in cell viability after 48 hrs by 7AAD-staining based FACS analysis
AID540213Half life in human after iv administration2008Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, Jul, Volume: 36, Issue:7
Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds.
AID1459631Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome in human HL60 cells using Suc-LLVYaminoluciferin as substrate at 0.2 uM after 2 hrs by fluorescence analysis2017European journal of medicinal chemistry, Jan-05, Volume: 125Urea-containing peptide boronic acids as potent proteasome inhibitors.
AID316581Protein binding in human plasma2008Journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-28, Volume: 51, Issue:4
Discovery of a potent, selective, and orally active proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of cancer.
AID700310Cytotoxicity against human bortezomib-resistant DOGUM cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Identification of a glutathione peroxidase inhibitor that reverses resistance to anticancer drugs in human B-cell lymphoma cell lines.
AID66813Inhibitory activity against human leukocyte elastase1998Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Feb-17, Volume: 8, Issue:4
Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: dipeptidyl boronic acids.
AID706480Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta1/beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human HL60a cells at 40 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1156358Growth inhibition of human K562 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID706481Effect on 20S proteasome subunit beta5 chymotrypsin-like activity in human THP1 cells at 200 nM relative to control2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID700312Cytotoxicity against human bortezomib-resistant GUMBUS cells after 72 hrs by MTT assay2012Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Nov-01, Volume: 22, Issue:21
Identification of a glutathione peroxidase inhibitor that reverses resistance to anticancer drugs in human B-cell lymphoma cell lines.
AID706516Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 7 nM bortezonib-resistant human CEM cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 C52F mutant to IC50 for wild type human CEM cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID1156363Growth inhibition of human EKVX cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1818940Antiproliferative activity against dexamethasone-sensitive human MM.1S cells assessed as reduction in cell viability measured after 72 hrs by XTT assay2022Journal of natural products, 01-28, Volume: 85, Issue:1
Phytochemical Investigation of the Roots of
AID1156375Growth inhibition of human HT-29 cells2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Aug-18, Volume: 83Optimization of peptidomimetic boronates bearing a P3 bicyclic scaffold as proteasome inhibitors.
AID1624031Inhibition of DPP4 (unknown origin) at 10 ug/mL using Ala-Pro-AMC as substrate by fluorometric analysis relative to control2019European journal of medicinal chemistry, Feb-15, Volume: 164Covalent docking modelling-based discovery of tripeptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of aliphatic-heterocycles.
AID1372754Cytotoxicity against human SK-N-SH cells assessed as reduction in cell viability at 0.1 to 1 uM after 24 hrs by MTT assay2018Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry, 01-15, Volume: 26, Issue:2
Immunoproteasome inhibition and bioactivity of thiasyrbactins.
AID1128512Inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of human 20S proteasome beta 5 subunit assessed as Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC substrate hydrolysis after 10 mins by fluorometric analysis2014European journal of medicinal chemistry, Apr-09, Volume: 76Identification of a new series of amides as non-covalent proteasome inhibitors.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID706509Resistance factor, ratio of IC50 for 40 nM bortezonib-resistant human A549 cells harboring proteosome subunit beta5 M45V mutant to IC50 for wild type human A549 cells2012Journal of medicinal chemistry, Dec-13, Volume: 55, Issue:23
Molecular mechanisms of acquired proteasome inhibitor resistance.
AID496342Induction of TNFalpha gene expression in HBV infected 1.3.32 transgenic mouse liver at 1 mg/kg, iv after 2 days by Rnase protection assay2010Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, Feb, Volume: 54, Issue:2
Bortezomib inhibits hepatitis B virus replication in transgenic mice.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347127qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347150Optimization screen NINDS AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Linked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347111qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347124qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347129qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347113qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347126qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347155Optimization screen NINDS Rhodamine qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Linked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347169Tertiary RLuc qRT-PCR qHTS assay for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347110qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for A673 cells)2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347119qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347114qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347118qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347116qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347117qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347168HepG2 cells viability qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347109qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347112qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347115qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347122qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347125qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347167Vero cells viability qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347151Optimization of GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors: Unlinked NS2B-NS3 protease assay2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347149Furin counterscreen qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1347123qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347121qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347128qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1745854NCATS anti-infectives library activity on HEK293 viability as a counter-qHTS vs the C. elegans viability qHTS2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1347415qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: tertiary screen by RT-qPCR2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1745855NCATS anti-infectives library activity on the primary C. elegans qHTS viability assay2023Disease models & mechanisms, 03-01, Volume: 16, Issue:3
In vivo quantitative high-throughput screening for drug discovery and comparative toxicology.
AID1347412qHTS assay to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: Counter screen cell viability and HiBit confirmation2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347414qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: Secondary screen by immunofluorescence2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID180049820S proteasome chymotrypsin-like inhibition assay from Article 10.1111/cbdd.12342: \\Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Peptidyl Epoxyketone Proteasome Inhibitors Composed of ??????-amino Acids.\\2014Chemical biology & drug design, Nov, Volume: 84, Issue:5
Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of peptidyl epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors composed of β-amino acids.
AID977610Experimentally measured binding affinity data (Ki) for protein-ligand complexes derived from PDB2010The Biochemical journal, Sep-15, Volume: 430, Issue:3
Characterization of a new series of non-covalent proteasome inhibitors with exquisite potency and selectivity for the 20S beta5-subunit.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (6,728)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's2 (0.03)18.2507
2000's1549 (23.02)29.6817
2010's3972 (59.04)24.3611
2020's1205 (17.91)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 84.49

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index84.49 (24.57)
Research Supply Index8.95 (2.92)
Research Growth Index6.91 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index151.98 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index2.00 (0.95)

This Compound (84.49)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials860 (12.52%)5.53%
Reviews970 (14.12%)6.00%
Case Studies848 (12.35%)4.05%
Observational43 (0.63%)0.25%
Other4,147 (60.38%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (890)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Comparing the Combination of CNTO 328 (Anti-IL-6 Monoclonal Antibody) and Velcade Versus Velcade Alone in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00401843]Phase 2307 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-28Completed
An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 2, Pilot Study, Evaluating Early Treatment With Bispecific T-cell Redirectors (Teclistamab and Talquetamab) in the Frontline Therapy of Newly Diagnosed High-risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT05849610]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Combination Bortezomib and Rituximab as Front-line Therapy for Low-grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00369707]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-09Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of VELCADE With Rituximab or Rituximab Alone in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory, Rituximab Naive or Sensitive Follicular B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00312845]Phase 3676 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Phase II Study of PS-341 Alone or in Combination With Irinotecan in Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) or Stomach [NCT00061932]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Maintenance vs Consolidation Bortezomib Therapy Following Aggressive Chemo-Immunotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00310037]Phase 2151 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Active, not recruiting
HLA-Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation With Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide and Bortezomib Following Fludarbine/Melphalan/Total Body Irradiation Conditioning Regimen [NCT03850366]Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-03-08Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Low Toxicity GVHD Prevention and Enhanced Immune Recovery With Tacrolimus, Bortezomib and Thymoglobulin® TBT [NCT02877082]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Terminated
A Phase II Evaluation of Bortezomib (Velcade™, PS-341, NSC #681239, IND #58443) in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Epithelial Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [NCT00023712]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-05Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Teclistamab Monotherapy Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (PVd) or Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone (Kd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Thera [NCT05572515]Phase 3590 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-29Recruiting
A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multicenter, Inferentially Seamless Phase 2/3 Study of Ibrutinib in Combination With Rituximab Versus Physician's Choice of Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab or Bortezomib Plus Rituximab in Participants With Relapsed or Ref [NCT05564052]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-12-06Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, Multicohort Study of Daratumumab-Based Therapies in Participants With Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis [NCT05250973]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-01Recruiting
Phase 1b Study of REGN5458 (Anti-BCMA x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Antibody) Plus Other Cancer Treatments for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT05137054]Phase 1317 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-17Recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Teclistamab in Combination With Daratumumab SC (Tec-Dara) Versus Daratumumab SC, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DPd) or Daratumumab SC, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd) in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory [NCT05083169]Phase 3587 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-10-14Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (VRd) Followed by Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel, a Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Directed Against BCMA Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) [NCT04923893]Phase 3650 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-19Recruiting
A Multi-arm Phase 1b Study of Teclistamab With Other Anticancer Therapies in Participants With Multiple Myeloma [NCT04722146]Phase 1140 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-03-12Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing JNJ-68284528, a Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Directed Against BCMA, Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) or Daratumumab, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (DPd) in Subjects With Rela [NCT04181827]Phase 3419 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-12Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, Multicohort Open-Label Study of JNJ-68284528, a Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell (CAR-T) Therapy Directed Against BCMA in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma [NCT04133636]Phase 2169 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-07Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of High-Dose Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide and Bortezomib (CyBor) for the Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) [NCT03945591]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-06-20Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3 Study Comparing Daratumumab, VELCADE (Bortezomib), Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (D-VRd) With VELCADE, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) in Subjects With Untreated Multiple Myeloma and for Whom Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant is Not Pla [NCT03652064]Phase 3395 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-06Active, not recruiting
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Study to Compare Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd) vs Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in Chinese Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT03234972]Phase 3211 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study of VELCADE (Bortezomib) Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) Compared to Daratumumab in Combination With VMP (D-VMP), in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for High [NCT03217812]Phase 3220 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-11-23Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Single Arm, Phase 2a Study of Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone and Elotuzumab in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02375555]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-07Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of First Line Dexamethasone, Rituximab and Cyclophosphamide (DRC) +/- Bortezomib for Patients With Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia [NCT01788020]Phase 3202 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Daratumumab Combined With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Mayo 04 Stage III Light Chain Amyloidosis: a Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial [NCT04474938]Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-05-24Active, not recruiting
Phase I Trial of PD 0332991 Plus Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT01111188]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-23Terminated
A Randomized Phase II Study of DaRatumumab, Ixazomib, and Dexamethasone vs Daratumumab, Bortezomib (VElcade) and Dexamethasone Followed by Daratumumab-Ixazomib-Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (DeRIVE Study) [NCT03942224]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-03Active, not recruiting
(PRO#11307) Phase III Randomized Study of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation With High-dose Melphalan Versus High-dose Melphalan and Bortezomib in Patients With Multiple Myeloma 65 Year or Older [NCT01453088]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-24Terminated(stopped due to Lack of Accrual)
[NCT01250808]0 participants Expanded AccessAvailable
Assessment of Bortezomib (Alvocade ®) Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT04348006]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-01Withdrawn(stopped due to No patients were enrolled in the study)
A Randomized, Open-label Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (KRd vs. VRd) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (COBRA) [NCT03729804]Phase 3250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-05-07Recruiting
A Pilot Trial to Assess Mobilization of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells With a Combination of Bortezomib and G-CSF in Patients Undergoing Autologous Transplant for Myeloma and Lymphoma [NCT01171092]Early Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Immune Modulation Therapy for ERT-naïve or ERT-treated Pompe Disease Patients [NCT02525172]Phase 48 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Recruiting
Randomized Study Comparing Conventional Dose Treatment Using a Combination of Lenalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone to High-Dose Treatment With ASCT in the Initial Management of Myeloma in Patients up to 65 Years of Age [NCT01191060]Phase 3700 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Completed
A Phase Ⅰ Clinical Study of Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome Injection in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT05052970]Phase 160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-10-20Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Vorinostat and Bortezomib in Children With Refractory of Recurrent Solid Tumors, Including CNS Tumors and Lymphomas [NCT01132911]Phase 15 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-05-10Completed
An Evaluation of Bortezomib (VelcadeR ) Followed by High-Dose Melphalan and Bortezomib (VelcadeR) as Conditioning Regimen for Tandem Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplants in Patients With Primary Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Leukemia [NCT00307086]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Phase 2 Study of Bortezomib (Velcade) for the Treatment of Steroid Refractory Chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease [NCT01158105]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of the Use of Bortezomib for the Treatment of Relapsed Leukemia or Positive Minimal Residual Disease [NCT05137860]Phase 456 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-12Recruiting
A Phase 1b, Open-label, Multicenter Study of (BMS-936564) in Combination With Lenalidomide (Revlimid) Plus Low-dose Dexamethasone, or With Bortezomib (Velcade) Plus Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01359657]Phase 146 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
University of Arkansas (UARK# 2017-03): A Single-Arm, Open-label Study of Anti-SLAMF7 mAb Therapy After Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Multiple Myeloma (Total Therapy 8) [NCT03168100]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-01Withdrawn(stopped due to No study population. No subjects enrolled.)
Phase IB Dose Escalation Study of Bortezomib (VELCADE) Administered Weekly for 4 Weeks and Sunitinib (SU-011248) Administered Daily for 4 Weeks Followed by a 14 Day Rest in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00720148]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Study of Cyclophosphamide,Liposome Doxorubicin Dexamethasone(CDD) Plus Bortezomib Compared With CDD in the Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Combined With Extramedullary Plasmacytoma Patients [NCT02336386]Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-12-31Recruiting
Daratumumab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Previously Untreated and Relapsed Subjects With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02951819]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-09Completed
Randomized, Multicenter Study of Tolerability and Efficacy of Modified Combinations of Bortezomib, Dexamethasone and Cyclophosphamide in Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma. [NCT02086942]Phase 294 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-08-31Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Teclistamab in Combination With Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone With or Without Bortezomib as Induction Therapy and Teclistamab in Combination With Daratumumab and Lenalidomide as Maintenance [NCT05695508]Phase 270 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-01Recruiting
Phase II Trial for Newly Diagnosed Low-risk Multiple Myeloma Patients Comparing 6 Cycles of Isatuximab With Lenalidomide/Bortezomib/Dexamethasone (I-VRD) Compared to 3 Cycles of I-VRD Followed by One Cycle of High-dose Therapy and Both Arms Followed by Ma [NCT05665140]Phase 2/Phase 3100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-03Recruiting
Phase II Study of Simvastatin, Zoledronic Acid, Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Methylprednisolone for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma [NCT01332617]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigators no longer interested in activating study)
Phase II Study Evaluating the Effect of Adding Bortezomib to Ibrutinib in Ibrutinib Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT03617484]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Enrollment and/or interactions/interventions temporarily paused due to COVID-19 and expected to resume in the future. This is not a suspension of IRB approval.)
Multicenter Phase II, Double-blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Maintenance Ixazomib After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk Multiple Myeloma (BMT CTN 1302) [NCT02440464]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Completed
Therapy of Antibody-mediated Autoimmune Diseases by Bortezomib (TAVAB) [NCT02102594]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-31Terminated(stopped due to recruitment difficulties)
Phase II Trial of Plitidepsin (Aplidin®) in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients Double Refractory to Bortezomib and Lenalidomide [NCT03117361]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-08Terminated(stopped due to PharmaMar has decided to end this study due to the slow recruitment rate of the trial)
[NCT01376401]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Radium-223 Dichloride (BAY88-8223) in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Early Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02928029]Phase 1/Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-10Terminated(stopped due to Due to the changes of standard of care and the slow recruitment of participants.)
Bendamustine Plus Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone in the Treatment of Stage II/III Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01168804]Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
An Open-Label Study of Bendamustine Combined With Bortezomib for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00920855]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Phase I Study of the Combination of Midostaurin, Bortezomib, and Chemotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01174888]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Randomized Phase II Study of Dose-Adjusted EPOCH-Rituximab-Bortezomib (EPOCH-R-B) Induction Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance Versus Observation in Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma With Microarray Profiling and Proteomics [NCT00114738]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-15Completed
Dose Individualization of Antineoplastic Drugs and Anti-Infective Drug in Children With Hematoplastic Disease [NCT03844360]Phase 41,500 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-01-31Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Bevacizumab and Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00464178]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Terminated(stopped due to The study was closed early due to poor accrual)
Phase 1 and 2 Study of Combination Treatment of Bortezomib, Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Recurrent Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT01322776]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-03-31Recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of Combined Weekly Bortezomib (VELCADE®) and Y-90-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma and Transformed Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00372905]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-24Terminated(stopped due to Study was closed permanently before the accrual goal was met due to slow accrual)
Phase I Clinical Trial of Vorinostat (MK-0683) in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Advanced Multiple Myeloma [NCT00111813]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Tamoxifen and Bortezomib in Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas [NCT00108069]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Am Open-Label Phase II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Combination Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00378209]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Combination Rituximab-CHOP and Bortezomib (Velcade®) (R-CHOP-V) Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance (VM) Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00376961]Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Phase 2 Study With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Driven Adaptive Strategy in Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) With Upfront Daratumumab-based Therapy [NCT04140162]Phase 257 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-10-05Active, not recruiting
Bortezomib-based Regimen for Refractory or Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults [NCT06034561]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
TINI 2: Total Therapy for Infants With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia II [NCT05848687]Phase 1/Phase 290 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1/2, Open-label, Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Lower Dose of Bortezomib Plus Busulfan and Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem [NCT01255527]Phase 1/Phase 253 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-10-31Recruiting
A Trial of Single Autologous Transplant With or Without Consolidation Therapy Versus Tandem Autologous Transplant With Lenalidomide Maintenance for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (BMT CTN 0702) [NCT01109004]Phase 3758 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
Bortezomib in Combination With Continuous Low-dose Oral Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethason Followed by Maintenance in Primary Refractory or Relapsed Bortezomib naïve Multiple Myeloma Patients. A Prospective Phase II Study. [NCT02467010]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Randomized, Phase II Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (RVD) With or Without Panobinostat in Transplant Eligible, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02720510]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-14Terminated(stopped due to A study was terminated due to low enrollment.)
A Study of Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BTD) Versus Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BBD) in Patients With Renal Failure Defined as a GFR Below 30 Mls/Min [NCT02424851]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Phase 2/3 Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial of Tanespimycin (KOS-953) Plus Bortezomib Comparing Three Doses of Tanespimycin in Patients With Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00514371]Phase 2/Phase 322 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Phase II, Multi-center, Single Arm, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Japanese Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02290431]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-16Completed
A Phase II, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, Low-Dose Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT05408026]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-10-01Withdrawn(stopped due to Study withdrawn, trial therapy deemed no longer novel and there was a lack of site interest.)
A Phase Ib Study of Isatuximab, Velcade, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Severe KIDNEY Disease [NCT04912427]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-04-01Active, not recruiting
An Open-label Phase II Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab and Bortezomib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acquired Hemophilia A [NCT03700229]Phase 222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-10-10Recruiting
A Phase 1b, Open-Label Study of Eftozanermin Alfa (ABBV-621) in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT04570631]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-11-05Active, not recruiting
Fase II Study With Bortezomib, Rituximab and Bendamustin-BRB- for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoplasmocytic Lymphoma/Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia's Patients at First Relapse [NCT02371148]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Bortezomib Sensitization of Recurrent Glioblastoma With Unmethylated MGMT Promoter to Temozolomide Phase 1B/II Study [NCT03643549]Phase 1/Phase 263 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-08-30Recruiting
Phase 1 Clinical Trial to Evaluate Security and Dose of Expanded and Activated Autologous NK Cells Infusions in Consolidation of Multiple Myeloma Patients Treatment on Second or Later Relapse. [NCT02481934]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Phase III Trial of High-dose Melphalan and Stem Cell Transplantation Versus High-dose Melphalan and Bortezomib and Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With AL Amyloidosis [NCT02489500]Phase 33 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Enrollment held for toxicity evaluation; then closed due to competing trial)
Moscow-Berlin 2015 Multicenter Randomized Study for Treatment of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults [NCT03390387]4,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Recruiting
Bendamustine, Prednisone and Velcade® for First-line Treatment of Patients With Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma Not Eligible for High-dose Chemotherapy Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (BPV). [NCT02237261]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
An Open, One-arm, Prospective Study of a Single Dose Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody Combined With Bortezomib for Treatment of Relapsed Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia [NCT04083014]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-20Recruiting
Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Parallel Multi-Center Study to Assess the Efficacy of Cannabidiol (BRCX014) Combined With Standard-Of-Care Treatment in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma, Glioblastoma Multiforme, and GI Malignancies [NCT03607643]Phase 1/Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-15Not yet recruiting
An Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 1b Study Investigating the Safety of TAK-079 in Combination With Backbone Regimens for the Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma and for Whom Stem Cell Transplantation Is Not Planned as Initial Therap [NCT03984097]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-07-29Active, not recruiting
Phase I Exploratory Study of Panobinostat IV in Combination With Bortezomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT00891033]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated because the drug company stopped making the study drug)
Treatment of Chronic Active Antibody-mediated Rejection With Bortezomib in Kidney Transplantation [NCT02201576]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-11Completed
A Phase I Study of the Safety and Feasibility of Bortezomib in Combination With G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02220608]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-20Completed
Pharmacokinetic Study of Bortezomib (VELCADE) Administered Intravenously in Taiwanese Patients With Multiple Myeloma - A Post Approval Commitment Study [NCT02268890]Phase 418 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-31Completed
An Open-label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Initially Treated With an Injection of Proteasome [NCT03416374]Phase 445 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-02-18Completed
A Phase II, Open-label Study of Bortezomib Following Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With High-risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT02308280]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Velcade (Bortezomib) in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma [NCT00153920]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Concurrent Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside in the Prophylactic Treatment of Bortezomib-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients of Multiple Myeloma [NCT02093910]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-04-30Recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Perifosine Added to the Combination of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT01002248]Phase 3135 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Terminated
A Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Dose-Escalation and Expansion Study of Combination Therapy With Venetoclax, Daratumumab and Dexamethasone (With and Without Bortezomib) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT03314181]Phase 2156 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-02Active, not recruiting
An Open-label Study of Ibrutinib in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02902965]Phase 274 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-20Completed
Isa-RVD Study: Phase II, Multi-centre, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Regimen Isatuximab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT05123131]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-01Recruiting
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01734928]Phase 3559 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-07Completed
A Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With BRCA Wild-type Platinum-resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer [NCT03509246]Phase 244 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-05-15Recruiting
Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Velcade in Combination With Lenalidomide in Patients With Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02312102]Phase 122 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-02-28Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Study of DOXIL/CAELYX (Doxorubicin HCL Liposome Injection) and VELCADE (Bortezomib) or VELCADE Monotherapy for the Treatment of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00103506]Phase 3646 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Escalating Doses of Thalidomide in Conjunction With Bortezomib and HIgh Dose Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Advanced Multiple Myeloma [NCT01242267]Phase 1/Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-11Completed
A Multicenter Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Subcutaneous Daratumumab in Combination With Standard Multiple Myeloma Treatment Regimens [NCT03412565]Phase 2265 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-26Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab in Combination With Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) Compared to CyBorD Alone in Newly Diagnosed Systemic AL Amyloidosis [NCT03201965]Phase 3416 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-05Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study of VELCADE (Bortezomib) Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) Compared to Daratumumab in Combination With VMP (D-VMP), in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for High-dose Therapy [NCT02195479]Phase 3706 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-09Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 1b Study of JNJ-54767414 (HuMax CD38) (Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody) in Combination With Backbone Regimens for the Treatment of Subjects With Multiple Myeloma [NCT01998971]Phase 1242 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-18Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Daratumumab-Selinexor-Velcade-Dexamethasone (Dara-SVD) for High-Risk Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT06169215]Phase 282 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-20Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1/2, Multicenter, Open-label, Study to Determine the Recommended Dose and Regimen, and Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of CC-92480 in Combination With Standard Treatments in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) [NCT03989414]Phase 1/Phase 2424 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-09-30Recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of DFMO in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Neuroblastoma [NCT02139397]Phase 1/Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of VELCADE®-BEAM and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Transformed or Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00571493]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-14Completed
Phase I Two-Dimensional Dose-Finding Study of Bortezomib in Combination With Gemcitabine/Doxorubicin in Metastatic Surgically Unresectable Urothelial Cancer or Other Solid Tumors [NCT00479128]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of Hydroxychloroquine Added to Bortezomib for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma [NCT00568880]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-08Completed
Serial Measurements of Molecular and Architectural Responses to Therapy (SMMART) Trial: PRIME [NCT03878524]Phase 12 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-04-01Active, not recruiting
International Collaborative Treatment Protocol for Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia - AIEOP-BFM ALL 2017 [NCT03643276]Phase 35,000 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-15Recruiting
Intergroup Randomized Phase 2 Four Arm Study In Patients ≥ 60 With Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma Of Therapy With: Arm A = Rituximab+ Bendamustine Followed By Rituximab Consolidation (RB → R); Arm B = Rituximab + Bendamustine + Bortezomib Follo [NCT01415752]Phase 2373 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-09Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study of Rituximab Combined With Bortezomib Versus Rituximab in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) [NCT03443570]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-03-01Not yet recruiting
Phase 3 Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial of Tanespimycin (KOS-953) Plus Bortezomib Compared to Bortezomib Alone in Patients With Multiple Myeloma in First Relapse [NCT00546780]Phase 331 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Phase II Trial of Weekly Bortezomib and Dexamethasone With Oral Metronomic Cyclophosphamide in Elderly Patients With Plasma Cell Myeloma [NCT02082405]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Funding unavailable)
Phase 0 Microdose Study to Evaluate the Effect of Melphalan, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone on Cellular Gene-expression in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02109861]Early Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma or Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma [NCT00104871]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
Treatment of Renal Failure Due to Myeloma Cast Nephropathy: Comparison of Two Different Chemotherapy Regimens and Evaluation of Optimized Removal of Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Light Chains Using a High Permeability Hemodialysis Membrane. [NCT01208818]Phase 3284 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-06-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Bortezomib (VELCADE) in Combination With Pralatrexate in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01114282]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Bortezomib in Combination With Liposomal Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone to Treat Plasma Cell Leukemia [NCT01328236]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-09-30Recruiting
Early Response-adapted Intensification of Induction Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Who Are Eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Multicenter Phase 2 Study [NCT01114048]Phase 278 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-03-31Recruiting
Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Azacitidine (Vidaza) and Bortezomib (Velcade) in T-Cell Lymphoma [NCT01129180]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Phase 3, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study of VELCADE-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (VTD) Versus Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (TD) for Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Who Are Candidates to Receive Double Autologous Transplantation [NCT01134484]Phase 3480 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2a Study of Once Daily Intravenous Busulfan With Bortezomib, Followed by an Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) in Subjects With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma After Prior Autologous HSCT [NCT01009840]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Phase 2 Study of BHQ880, an Anti-Dickkopf1 (DKK1) Monoclonal Antibody (mAb), in Patients With Untreated Multiple Myeloma and Renal Insufficiency [NCT01337752]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Multicenter Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib in Patients With Severe Autoimmune Encephalitis [NCT03993262]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-13Recruiting
Phase II Study of PS-341 for Patients With High-Risk, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00075881]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
An Open-label, Multi-center, Phase I-Ib/II Study of AUY922 Administered as Single Agent and in Combination With Bortezomib With or Without Dexamethasone in Adult Patients in Relapse or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. [NCT00708292]Phase 1/Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized Trial Investigating Bortezomib (NSC# 681239) on a Modified Augmented BFM (ABFM) Backbone in Newly Diagnosed T-Lymphoblastic Leukemia (T-ALL) and T-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LLy) [NCT02112916]Phase 3847 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-10-04Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of SOM230 LAR in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01329289]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Clinical trial being transferred to Columbia University with the Investigator.)
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab and Carfilzomib-based Induction/Consolidation/Maintenance Therapy in Transplant-eligible, Ultra High-risk, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT06140966]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-20Recruiting
Multicenter Non-interventional Study to Investigate Drug Utilization of Pomalidomide in Clinical Practice for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (rrMM) [NCT02555839]150 participants (Anticipated)Observational2015-02-20Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase III Trial of CC-5013 (Lenalidomide, NSC-703813) and Low Dose Dexamethasone (LLD) Versus Bortezomib (PS-341, NSC-681239), Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone (BLLD) for Induction, in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myelom [NCT00644228]Phase 3525 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of Palbociclib in Combination With Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT03515200]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-20Terminated(stopped due to Due to departure of PI from St. Jude)
Open Label Study of the Anti Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor (IGF-1R) Monoclonal Antibody, AVE1642, as Single Agent (Dose Escalation, Part 1) and in Combination With Velcade® (Combination, Part 2) in Patients With Recurrent, Refractory Multiple Myel [NCT01233895]Phase 126 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide, Subcutaneous Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Combination Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02441686]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-12-31Active, not recruiting
An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase II Study of Belantamab Mafodotin in Combination With VRd for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT04802356]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-07Recruiting
A National, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Phase IIb Study of Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Older Than 65 Years With Sequential Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade (MPV) Followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) [NCT01237249]Phase 2250 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Siltuximab (Anti-IL-6 Monoclonal Antibody) or Placebo in Combination With VELCADE and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01266811]Phase 30 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study canceled based on results of different study with similar hypothesis, investigational agent, & patient)
Phase I Trial of Nelfinavir and Bortezomib in Advanced Hematologic Malignancies [NCT01164709]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Velcade for Proliferative Lupus Nephritis [NCT01169857]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Withdrawn(stopped due to No participants were enrolled.)
Phase I Study of The Combination of Bortezomib and Sorafenib Followed by Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT01861314]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-03Active, not recruiting
IFM2008: Frontline Therapy in de Novo Multiple Myeloma Patients Under 65, (a Phase 2 Multicenter Trial) [NCT01206205]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Bortezomib in Combination With MEC (Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, and Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine) for Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) [NCT01127009]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
An Open-Label, Pilot Study To Investigate Feasibility and Safety Of Using Bortezomib, Rituximab, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide As Salvage Regime In Previously Treated Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT01226849]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Phase I Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose of the Combination of Ruxolitinib and Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma [NCT02613598]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-12Completed
Phase II Study of Ibrutinib With or Without Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis [NCT03130348]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-03-15Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was dropped at site before participation)
Quantitating the Impact of Plerixafor Alone or in Combination With Bortezomib on Plasma Cell Mobilization and the Subsequent Impact on HLA Antibody Levels [NCT02522572]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-08-31Recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Bortezomib (Velcade®), Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly [NCT03319667]Phase 3475 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-12-07Active, not recruiting
Combination of Ibrutinib and Bortezomib Followed by Ibrutinib Maintenance to Treat Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma; a Multicenter Phase I/II Trial. [NCT02356458]Phase 1/Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-31Terminated(stopped due to SAKK Board decision of 14th November 2020 due to financial reasons.)
Phase II Study of Bortezomib (VELCADE) for the Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory T-cell Prolymphocytic Leukemia [NCT01162031]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to no accrual)
A Randomized Phase III Trial of Melphalan and Dexamethasone (MDex) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan and Dexamethasone (BMDex) for Untreated Patients With Systemic Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis Ineligible for Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation [NCT01078454]Phase 311 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
(RICE) Plus Bortezomib (Velcade) in a Dose-Escalating Fashion for Patients With Relapsed or Primary Refractory Aggressive B-Cell NHL [NCT01300793]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to closed for low accrual and no data is available.)
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Bortezomib in Patients With De-novo Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia and Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma [NCT03335098]Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-21Recruiting
A Single Arm, Multi-center, Phase II Clinical Trial of VR-CAP in the First-line Treatment for Patients With Marginal Zone Lymphoma [NCT04433156]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-04-22Recruiting
Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in NDMM Patients With Renal Injury (RI):A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Open-label Trial. [NCT05432414]Phase 279 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-12-08Recruiting
Phase II Study of Bortezomib (PS-341) and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin as Initial Therapy for Adult Patients With Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma [NCT00088855]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-15Completed
A Phase 1b Study of JNJ-54767414 (Daratumumab) in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (D-Vd) in Japanese Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) [NCT02497378]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-10Completed
Safety and Efficacy Pilot Trial of the Anti-Viral and Anti-Tumor Activity of Velcade Combined With (R)ICE in Subjects With EBV and/or HHV-8 Positive Relapsed/Refractory AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00598169]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Phase 1/2 Study of Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone With or Without Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma With Assessment for t(11;14) Status [NCT03701321]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-25Withdrawn(stopped due to Drug supply issues)
Response Adapted Therapy With Bortezomib/Dexamethasone Followed by Addition of Lenalidomide in Non Responders as Initial Treatment for Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT01919086]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Bortezomib and Gemcitabine in Elderly Patients With Solid Tumors (X05227) [NCT00620295]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Panobinostat in Combination With Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT04956302]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-09-27Terminated(stopped due to PI Decision)
Phase 1/2 Trial of Iberdomide in Combination With Daratumumab, BortEzomib and DexamethAsone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple MyeLoma (IDEAL) [NCT05392946]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-11Recruiting
Thalidomide-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone in Patients < 75 Years or Velcade-Melfalan-Prednisone (V-MP)/Thalidomide-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone in Patients >75 Years, in Refractary or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00652041]Phase 440 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Rituximab, Venetoclax (ABT 199) and Bortezomib in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) [NCT04285268]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-06Withdrawn(stopped due to funding available)
Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Combination With Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab for Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00958256]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Trial Assessing the Benefit of the Addition of Isatuximab to Lenalidomide / Bortezomib / Dexamethasone (RVd) Induction and Lenalidomide Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT03617731]Phase 3662 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study Incorporating Bone Marrow Microenvironment (ME) - Co-Targeting Bortezomib Into Tandem Melphalan-Based Autotransplants With DTPACE for Induction/Consolidation and Thalidomide + Dexamethasone for Maintenance [NCT00572169]Phase 3177 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study of Temsirolimus, Topotecan, and Bortezomib in Patients With Advanced Malignancy [NCT00770731]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
A Phase 1b Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of AMG 655 in Combination With Bortezomib or Vorinostat in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma [NCT00791011]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Lenalidomide, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone (RAD) Versus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (VRD) for Induction in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Followed by Response-adapted Consolidation and Lenalidomide Maintenance - A Randomized Multicenter Phase I [NCT01685814]Phase 3406 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
Preemptive Strike With Bortezomib (VELCADE) in Participants With Multiple Myeloma Still Event-free on Total Therapy 2 (UARK 98-026) [NCT00657553]Phase 310 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Due to poor accrual)
Phase I/II Trial of Combination Plerixafor (AMD3100) and Bortezomib in Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00903968]Phase 1/Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-01Completed
Phase II Trial of Velcade Plus Vorinostat in the Treatment of High Risk MDS and Relapsed/Refractory AML [NCT00818649]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Met protocol stop rule [i.e., extreme toxicity])
A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label Study of Subcutaneous and Intravenous VELCADE in Combination With Dexamethasone in Chinese Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02811978]Phase 381 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-27Completed
A Phase II Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade) Plus Prednisone for Initial Therapy of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease [NCT00815919]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Phase III Study for Patients Relapsing or Progressing After Autologous Transplantation on Total Therapy 2 (TT2, UARK 98-026): Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Dexamethasone [NCT00573391]Phase 35 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
A Multi-Centre Phase II Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Tolerability of Bortezomib Added to Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, Prednisone, and Rituximab (BCVP-R) for Patients With Advanced Stage Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Requiring Systemic First- [NCT00428142]Phase 295 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-01Completed
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib and Gemcitabine in Patients With Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00377052]Phase 229 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-16Completed
A Phase II Study Of PS-341 (NSC 681239) In Patients With Untreated Or Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00030875]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-11-19Completed
Phase I Dose Escalation of Velcade (Bortezomib) Daily Dose in Patients With Advances or Metastatic Solid Tumors [NCT02220049]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Phase II Two Arm Trial of the Proteasome Inhibitor, PS-341 (Velcade TM) in Combination With Irinotecan or PS-341 Alone Followed by the Addition of Irinotecan at Time of Progression in Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma o [NCT00103259]Phase 271 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
An Open-Label Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Perifosine and Bortezomib With or Without Dexamethasone for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Bortezomib [NCT00401011]Phase 1/Phase 284 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Mapatumumab (TRM-1 [HGS1012], a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to TRAIL-R1) in Combination With Bortezomib (Velcade) and Bortezomib Alone in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00315757]Phase 2105 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of the Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 (NSC 681 239) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00028639]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-08-31Completed
Phase I Study of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (PVD) as First-Line Treatment of AL Amyloidosis or Light Chain Deposition Disease [NCT01728259]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Terminated(stopped due to FDA placed the study on a clinical hold, due to the concerns by the FDA and Health Canada, Celgene decided to permanently close the study.)
Induction Therapy With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Alone in the Treatment of AL Amyloidosis [NCT01998503]Phase 356 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Completed
Bortezomib in Treating Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocellular Carcinoma Featuring PTEN Deficiency [NCT03345303]Phase 350 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Belimumab-Based Plasma Cell Targeted Therapy to Impact Transplant Eligibility [NCT02500251]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
A Prospective, Single-center, Phase II Study of Venetoclax/Selinexor Plus VRD Combined With CART-ASCT-CART2 Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagosed Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia [NCT05870917]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-25Recruiting
A Phase I/II, Open-label, Dose Escalation and Expansion Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, and Clinical Activity of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate GSK2857916 Administered in Combination With Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (Arm A), or Bortezomib Plus De [NCT03544281]Phase 1/Phase 2152 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-20Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase I/II Study of Optimal Induction Therapy of Bortezomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide With or Without Elotuzumab (NSC-764479) for Newly Diagnosed High Risk Multiple Myeloma (HRMM) [NCT01668719]Phase 1/Phase 2142 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Immunogenicity and Clinical Activity of the Antibody Drug Conjugate GSK2857916 in Japanese Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multi [NCT03828292]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-03-14Active, not recruiting
A Phase Ib Clinical Study of BBI608 for Adult Patients With Advanced, Refractory Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02352558]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Completed
A Phase1 Study at Stanford of Palbociclib in Combination With Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (RELPALL2) [NCT04996160]Phase 122 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-09Recruiting
A Phase 1/2 Trial of ASP7487 OSI-906)in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01672736]Phase 1/Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Terminated(stopped due to The Sponsor decided to stop further manufacture the study drug 'Linsitinib' in Nov 2015.)
A Phase I/IIa Trial of VTD-panobinostat Treatment and Panobinostat Maintenance in Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT02145715]Phase 1/Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-01-31Active, not recruiting
"A Phase III Randomized Trial for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Patients Considered Frail or in a Subset of Intermediate Fit Comparing Upfront Three-Drug Induction Regimens Followed by Double or Single-Agent Maintenance" [NCT05561387]Phase 3510 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-12Recruiting
A Phase III Randomized Trial for Patients With De Novo AML Using Bortezomib and Sorafenib (NSC# 681239, NSC# 724772) for Patients With High Allelic Ratio FLT3/ITD [NCT01371981]Phase 31,645 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-20Active, not recruiting
A Phase 1, Randomized, Dose and Schedule Evaluation Study to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Clinical Activity of Belantamab Mafodotin Administered in Combination With Standard of Care in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Mu [NCT04091126]Phase 1144 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-12-18Recruiting
Nelfinavir as Bortezomib-sensitizing Drug in Patients With Proteasome Inhibitor-nonresponsive Myeloma. A Multicenter Phase II Trial [NCT02188537]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-12-02Completed
A Phase I Study of Dasatinib With Bortezomib (Velcade®) and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00560352]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Terminated
A Protocol to Assess the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Continuous Subcutaneous Administration of Low-dose Lenalidomide (STAR-LLD) for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma (MM) [NCT06087653]Phase 1/Phase 26 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-02Recruiting
A Phase II Study of CyBorD (Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone) Plus Daratumumab for Patients With Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance (MGRS) [NCT06083922]Phase 253 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-16Recruiting
A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade), Melphalan, and Dexamethasone (V-MD) in Patients With Symptomatic AL-Amyloidosis or Light Chain Deposition Disease [NCT00520767]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Daratumumab Combined With Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (Dara-VCd) Versus the Association of Bortezomib-Thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTd) as Pre Transplant Induction and Post Transpl [NCT03896737]Phase 2401 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-16Active, not recruiting
Phase 1/2 Open-label Study Of The Safety And Efficacy Of Pd 0332991 In Combination With Bortezomib And Dexamethasone In Patients With Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00555906]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Standard Doses of Bortezomib and Pembrolizumab ± Reovirus (Pelareorep) Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (AMBUSH Study) [NCT05514990]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-07Recruiting
A Phase 2 Multi-Arm Study of Magrolimab Combinations in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT04892446]Phase 2153 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-09Active, not recruiting
B- PRISM (Precision Intervention Smoldering Myeloma): A Phase II Trial of Combination of Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in High- Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma [NCT04775550]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-03-08Recruiting
A National, Multicentric, Open-label Study of Induction Treatment With VELCADE and Dexamethasone for Previously Untreated Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Renal Failure [NCT01084837]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Randomized Study of 4 vs. 8 Cycles of Velcade-based Regimen With Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly-diagnosed Myeloma Patients [NCT00984828]Phase 2/Phase 323 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Very slow recruitment)
Phase 2, Multi-Center, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination Regimen Isatuximab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT04653246]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-13Recruiting
A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Vorinostat (Zolinza ®) + RVD (Lenalidomide {Revlimid ®} + Bortezomib {Velcade ®} + Dexamethasone) for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01038388]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-15Completed
Phase II Trial of VELCADE® (Bortezomib) for Steroid Refractory Acute GVHD [NCT00408928]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Phase II Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Combination Therapy With Velcade (Bortezomib), Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone (PAD) as Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00814541]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib (Velcade, PS-341) in Combination With Ifosfamide/Vinorelbine in Pediatric Patients and Young Adults With Refractory/Recurrent Hodgkin Disease [NCT00381940]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Phase I/II Study of the Combination of Bortezomib With Arsenic Trioxide, Ascorbic Acid and High-Dose Melphalan for Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00469209]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Vorinostat and Bortezomib in Children With Refractory or Recurrent Solid Tumors, Including CNS Tumors and Lymphomas [NCT00994500]Phase 120 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Active Immunization of Sibling Stem Cell Transplant Donors Against Purified Myeloma Protein of the Stem Cell Recipient With Multiple Myeloma in the Setting of Non-Myeloablative, HLA-Matched Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00006184]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-08Completed
Phase II Study of PS-341 in Low Grade Lymphoproliferative Disorders [NCT00023764]Phase 2103 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib Plus GDP in the Treatment of Refractory and Relapsed Non-GCB Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma [NCT02542111]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-05-31Recruiting
A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Erlotinib in Combination With Bortezomib in Subjects With Advanced Cancer. Companion Study to Umbrella Protocol 2007-0638. [NCT00895687]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
An Open-label Phase 2 Study of Intravenous Bortezomib and Oral Panobinostat (LBH589) in Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma or NK/T-cell Lymphoma After Failure of Conventional Chemotherapy [NCT00901147]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Completed
Phase II Trial of High-dose Melphalan and Bortezomib and Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With AL Amyloidosis [NCT00790647]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Phase 2 Evaluation of Daratumumab-Based Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients With Renal Insufficiency [NCT04352205]Phase 225 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-07Recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Subcutaneous Daratumumab in Combination With Dose-Attenuated Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Elderly Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT04052880]Phase 238 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-10-24Recruiting
Phase I/II Bortezomib, Melphalan and Low Dose TBI Conditioning for Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma [NCT01936090]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-31Completed
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind Study of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Combination With Either Venetoclax or Placebo in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Are Sensitive or Naïve to Proteasome Inhibitors [NCT02755597]Phase 3291 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-11Completed
Tandem Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant With Melphalan Followed by Melphalan and Bortezomib in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT01241708]Phase 3146 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-08Completed
A Randomized Phase III Study to Compare Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone (VMP) With High Dose Melphalan Followed by Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone (VRD) Consolidation and Lenalidomide Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01208766]Phase 31,503 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib (Velcade ) Administered as a Single Agent in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Patients [NCT00276614]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Clinical, Multicenter, Single-arm, Treatment With a Scheme With Low Doses of Bortezomib / Melphalan / Prednisone (MPV) in Patients With Multiple Myeloma (MM) Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic ≥75 Years [NCT02773550]Phase 424 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Low recruiment.)
Daratumumab Combined With Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Patients Presenting With Extramedullary Disease. The ANTARES Study [NCT04166565]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Paclitaxel (Taxol) and Bortezomib (Velcade) in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumor Malignancies Involving an Activated MAPK Pathway [NCT00667641]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
An Open-Label Phase 1/2a Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Combination With Either Bortezomib or Daratumumab in Patients With Relapsed or Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT03481556]Phase 1/Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-12Terminated(stopped due to The sponsor decided to terminate the study following an FDA request of a partial clinical hold.)
Selinexor With Alternating Bortezomib or Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone in Transplant Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients (SABLe): An Investigator Sponsored Trial [NCT04717700]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-18Recruiting
Phase I Study of Bortezomib (Velcade) and Cetuximab (Erbitux) for Patients With Solid Tumors Expressing EGFR [NCT00622674]Phase 137 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Phase I Trial of the MUC1 Inhibitor, GO-203-2c, in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02658396]Phase 10 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Study was never open due to lack of funding)
A Dose Escalation, Safety, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Preliminary Efficacy Study of SAR650984 (Isatuximab) Administered Intravenously in Combination With Bortezomib - Based Regimens in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Non Eli [NCT02513186]Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase One Study of Intravenous Irinotecan and Bortezomib in Children With Recurrent/Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma [NCT00644696]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase II Pilot Trial of Bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade) in Combination With Intensive Re-Induction Therapy for Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LL) [NCT00873093]Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of VcR-CVAD With Rituximab Consolidation and Maintenance for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00581776]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Phase 1 Trial of the Combination of Everolimus (RAD001) and Bortezomib (VELCADE) for Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma [NCT00671112]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Treatment ineffective)
IGEV +/- Bortezomib (Velcade) as Induction Before High Dose Consolidation in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma After First Line Treatment: a Randomized Phase II Trial. On Behalf of Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi [NCT00636311]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Phase II Study of Combination Bortezomib (Velcade PS-341) and Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia [NCT00422799]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-30Completed
Phase II Study of VDT (VELCADE, Doxil® and Thalidomide) as Frontline Therapy for Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma (MM) [NCT00523848]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Study of Daratumumab in Combination With Bortezomib (VELCADE), Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VTD) in the First Line Treatment of Transplant Eligible Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02541383]Phase 31,085 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-09-30Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open Label Study of ABBV-383 Compared With Standard Available Therapies in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (3L+ RRMM Monotherapy Study) [NCT06158841]Phase 3380 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-04-26Not yet recruiting
Phase II Trial of PS341 (NSC 681239) in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT00017329]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Three Different Regimens of Oral Panobinostat in Combination With Subcutaneous Bortezomib and Oral Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Mul [NCT02654990]Phase 2249 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-27Completed
A Phase II Study of Modified VR-CAP and Acalabrutinib as First Line Therapy for Transplant-Eligible Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT04626791]Phase 245 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-08-03Recruiting
A Multicentre, Non-Blinded Study Exploring Self-Administration of Chemotherapy in the Home Environment [NCT04268199]Phase 2100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-05-29Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (CYBOR-D) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Active Multiple Myeloma [NCT00609167]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
(Inhibition of NF-kB Signaling in Melanoma Therapy) A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of PS-341, a Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination With an Extended Continuous Oral Schedule of Temozolomide in Patients With Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors With the Phase II [NCT00512798]Phase 1/Phase 247 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-06-30Terminated(stopped due to This study was terminated due to lack of efficacy)
Randomized Phase III Trial of Consolidation Therapy With Bortezomib (Velcade®)-Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) -Dexamethasone (VRD) Versus Bortezomib (Velcade®)-Dexamethasone (VD) for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Have Completed a Dexamethasone Based Induct [NCT00522392]Phase 348 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
Single-Arm, Dose-Finding Pilot Trial of Single-Agent Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory AIDS-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma With Correlative Assessments of KSHV and HIV [NCT01016730]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-22Completed
Randomized Phase 3b Study of Three Treatment Regimens in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Not Considered Candidates for High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: VELCADE, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone Ver [NCT00507416]Phase 3502 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Bortezomib as Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis After Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00548717]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to First two patients enrolled after trial reopened, developed grade III-IV acute GVHD and subsequently passed away.)
A Phase 2, Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Velcade When Added to Adriamycin-Dexamethasone Treatment Versus Vincristine-Adriamycin-Dexamethasone Standard Treatment in Subjects With Multiple M [NCT00441168]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to TRIAL STOPPED due to a change in standard of care and the required patient numbers could no longer be achieved)
An Observational, Prospective Analysis of Retreatment With Bortezomib for Multiple Myeloma [NCT01030302]56 participants (Actual)Observational2008-11-30Completed
A Phase I Expanded Cohort Trial of Bortezomib and Sorafenib in Advanced Malignant Melanoma [NCT01078961]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CAEL-101 and Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment Versus Placebo and Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment in Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment Naïve Patients With Mayo Stage IIIa AL Amy [NCT04512235]Phase 3267 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-12Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Combination Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, and Rituximab in Previously Untreated Patients With Waldenstroms Macroglobulinemia: A Multicenter Trial of the European Myeloma Network [NCT00832234]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
An International, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Vorinostat (MK0683) in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00773838]Phase 2143 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-01Completed
Pilot Study of RCVELP as First Line Therapy for Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) [NCT00772668]3 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-25Terminated(stopped due to Funding)
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase I Study of MK-0683 in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00858234]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-13Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2 Study of VELCADE With Fludarabine in Comparison to Rituximab With Fludarabine in Follicular Lymphoma Patients Previously Treated With Rituximab [NCT00850499]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated
Phase II Study of Bortezomib (VELCADE) With Cisplatin as First Line Treatment of Malignant Mesothelioma [NCT00458913]Phase 282 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Velcade®-Melphalan Association as Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Stem-cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Patients Under 65 Years [NCT00642395]Phase 261 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-07-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Romidepsin and Bortezomib for Multiple Myeloma Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Disease [NCT00765102]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-01Terminated(stopped due to There was a change in the Sponsor's research strategy; safety concerns were not a factor.)
A Phase I/II Study of JNJ-26866138 (Bortezomib) in Japanese Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00752518]Phase 1/Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Phase III Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-label Study of ATG-010, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (SVd) Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) [NCT04939142]Phase 3150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-07-12Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label Phase IV Study of the Efficacy of Bortezomib-based Combination Therapy the Treatment of Subjects With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02559154]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Trial of Obatoclax Mesylate (GX15-070MS) in Combination With Bortezomib for the Treatment of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00719901]Phase 1/Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Terminated(stopped due to This trial was terminated due to slow accrual and the drug supply of Obatoclax during the phase I; therefore, the phase II portion will never open.)
A Phase II Trial of Combined Weekly Bortezomib and Tositumomab I-131 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Non-Hodg [NCT00479167]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of accrual and interest in study)
A Phase II Study of VDR (VELCADE™, DOXIL® and RITUXAN™) in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma [NCT00851552]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of sponsor support)
A Phase 2, Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Effect of VELCADE on Myeloma Related Bone Disease [NCT01286077]Phase 2106 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Randomized Phase III Study on Bortezomib and Low-Dose Dexamethasone With or Without Continuous Low-Dose Oral Cyclophosphamide for Primary Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00813150]Phase 396 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia [NCT05599880]Phase 229 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-07-07Recruiting
First-line Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma of Old Patients . Evaluate the Efficacy, Toxicity, and Molecular Prognostic Factors of Velcade®) in Association With Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy With Rituximab [NCT00740415]Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
A Phase 1b/2 Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Radium-223 Dichloride (BAY88-8223) in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Early Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02605356]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study restarted under new study number 18987)
Phase I/II Study of Liposomal Doxorubicin (Doxil®)/ Melphalan/Bortezomib (Velcade®) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00334932]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-02-28Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Velcade in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients With Impaired Renal Function [NCT00718640]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Study stopped due to lagging enrolment.)
A Two-Arm, Non-Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of VELCADE (Bortezomib) in Combination With Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, and Prednisone With or Without Doxorubicin Followed by Rituximab Maintenance in Patients With Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma. [NCT00715208]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
An International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Vorinostat (MK-0683) or Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00773747]Phase 3637 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-01Completed
A Phase II Study of VcR-CVAD With Rituximab Maintenance for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00433537]Phase 277 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
An Open-Label, Randomized, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Effectiveness of RCHOP With or Without VELCADE in Previously Untreated Non-Germinal Center B-Cell-like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients [NCT00931918]Phase 2206 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
An Open Label, Phase 2 Study of Biweekly VELCADE and Intermittent CAELYX in Patients With Ovarian Cancer Failing Platinum Containing Regimens [NCT00610792]Phase 291 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study never submitted to IND. Study is being sponsored by Johnson and Johnson in the EU only.)
H-11047: A Study of PS-341 Followed by Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate (Spore #: 11-01-30-13) [NCT00425503]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
Early Patient Access Single Named Patient Program for the Use of Ulocuplumab for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma [NCT02666209]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
Phase II Trial of Doxorubicin and Bortezomib in Patients With Incurable Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma [NCT00581360]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
A Phase I/II National, Open-label, Multicenter Study of Bortezomib (Velcade) in Combination With FLAG-IDA (VFLAG- IDA) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). [NCT00651781]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib (PS-341) in Combination With Carboplatin and Docetaxel for Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00714246]Phase 16 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Ofatumumab and Bendamustine vs. Ofatumumab, Bortezomib (NSC # 681239) and Bendamustine in Patients With Untreated Follicular Lymphoma [NCT01286272]Phase 2135 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-08Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant vs. Fulvestrant in Combination With Bortezomib in Women With ER Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT01142401]Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-26Completed
Targeted Oncolytic Virotherapy and Natural History Study of KSHV-Associated Multicentric Castleman's Disease With Laboratory and Clinical Correlates of Disease Activity [NCT00092222]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-28Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of SCH 727965 in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) or B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (B-CLL) [NCT00871546]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Terminated
Thalidomide Versus Bortezomib in Melphalan Refractory Myeloma [NCT00602511]Phase 3300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
A Prospective Study of Bortezomib Combined With CHEP Regimen in the Treatment of Primary Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma [NCT04061772]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-08-12Recruiting
An International, Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Study of PS-341 (VELCADE™) Versus High-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00048230]Phase 3620 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-06-30Completed
Phase I/II Study of Combination Everolimus (RAD001), and Rituximab (Rituxan), OR Everolimus, Bortezomib (Velcade, PS-341), and Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed and/or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia [NCT01125293]Phase 1/Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Per protocol, Phase II is to be terminated early if a less than 5% of the Phase II participants observe a Very Good Partial Response or Better in the first 23 participants enrolled to Phase II.)
A Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of Bortezomib (Velcade®), Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Doxil®), and Vorinostat (Suberoylanilide Hydromaxic Acid, Saha, Zolinzatm) in Patients With Relapse/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00744354]Phase 132 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Drugs unavailable- study terminated 1/2/18)
A Phase II Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (DVD) for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) [NCT00742404]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-07-31Active, not recruiting
Pilot Study of Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Rituximab for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory, Indolent or Mantle Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00547534]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Comparison Between Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA, Vorinostat TM) in Combination With Bortezomib (Velcade TM) and SAHA Alone in Refractory or Recurrent Advanced CTCL. A Randomized Study. [NCT01386398]Phase 30 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to Company withdrew interest)
A Phase 3, Open-Label Study of Elranatamab Monotherapy Versus Elotuzumab, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone (EPd) Or Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (PVd) Or Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone (Kd) In Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who R [NCT06152575]Phase 3492 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-18Not yet recruiting
Safety of Vorinostat in Combination With Bortezomib, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (VBDD) in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, A Phase I/II Study, Short Title: VBDD [NCT01394354]Phase 1/Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-08-31Completed
Phase I Study of Bortezomib and Romidepsin in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma, Indolent B-Cell Lymphoma, Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma or Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma [NCT00963274]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-26Completed
Phase I/II Trial of High-Dose Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Sitagliptin for the Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT05895201]Phase 1/Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-30Not yet recruiting
A Prospective, Open-Label, Pilot Study of Clonal Deletion on Living-Relative Donor Kidney Transplantation [NCT01408797]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2011-03-31Recruiting
Phase 1/2 Study of VELCADE® (Bortezomib), Dexamethasone, and Revlimid® (Lenalidomide) Versus VELCADE, Dexamethasone, Cyclophosphamide, and Revlimid Versus VELCADE, Dexamethasone and Cyclophosphamide in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma [NCT00507442]Phase 1/Phase 2158 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-08-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bendamustine, Velcade and Dexamethasone (BVD) in the Treatment of Elderly Patients (>= 65 Years) With Multiple Myeloma in 1st Relapse or Refractory to 1st Line Therapy [NCT01045681]Phase 275 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-03Completed
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Effect of CYP3A4 Induction on the Pharmacokinetics of VELCADE (Bortezomib) [NCT00608907]Phase 161 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
A Phase I Protocol of the Combination Bortezomib and Tipifarnib for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00972712]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
A Phase Ib Multiple Ascending Dose Study of BMS-833923 Alone or in Combination With Lenalidomide (Revlimid) Plus Dexamethasone or in Combination With Bortezomib (Velcade) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00884546]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
Phase 1 Study of Radiosensitization Using Bortezomib in Relapsed Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients Receiving Radioimmunotherapy [NCT00777114]Phase 131 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-01Completed
A Phase II Pilot Study of Bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade) Combined With Reinduction Chemotherapy in Children and Young Adults With Recurrent, Refractory or Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00666588]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
A Phase IIA Trial Testing the Efficacy of Bortezomib (Velcade(R)) in Patients With Advanced Waldenström Macroglobulinemia [NCT00777738]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (BM-MSCs) on Chronic Antibody-mediated Rejection (cAMR) After Kidney Transplantation: A Multi-center Perspective Study [NCT02563340]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-11-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase II, Open-Label, Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Activity of SRT501 Alone or in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00920556]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-30Terminated(stopped due to Study terminated.24 subjects enrolled;provided adequate data for decision making.)
Clinical Study on Induction of Remission Using Bortezomib (Vel), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Dexamethasone (D) in Patients Until 60 Years of Age With Untreated Multiple Myeloma and Planned for a High Dose Chemotherapy: (VelCD; Deutsche Studiengruppe Multipl [NCT00833560]Phase 2401 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Velcade Plus Dexamethasone (VD), VD+Cyclophosphamide or VD Plus Lenalidomide in MMY Patients Who Are Refractory or Have Relapsed After Their Primary Therapy for MMY and Have Achieved Stable Disease After 4 Cycles of VD [NCT00908232]Phase 2163 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
REal Life, Retrospective Study of BOrtezomib Use as secoND Treatment for Myeloma Patients Previously Exposed to Bortezomib-based Therapies as First Line [NCT02797041]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2015-08-31Active, not recruiting
Bortezomib and Vorinostat as Maintenance Therapy After Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma [NCT00839956]Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Phase III Study of Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01023308]Phase 3767 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-21Completed
Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (BCD) in Newly Diagnosed Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman's Disease (iMCD) : a Prospective, Single-center, Single-arm, Phase-II Pilot Trial [NCT03982771]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-01Recruiting
Phase II Study of Vorinostat (SAHA) in Combination With Bortezomib (PS-341) in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT00641706]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Velcade - Regulatory Post Marketing Surveillance (PMS) [NCT01005628]1,121 participants (Actual)Observational2006-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 3 Study of the Combination of Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, VELCADE, and Prednisone (VcR-CAP) or Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CHOP) in Patients With Newly [NCT00722137]Phase 3487 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-01Completed
Phase I/II Study Evaluating Rituximab, Lenalidomide, and Bortezomib in the First-Line or Second-Line Treatment of Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00633594]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Treatment With R-CHOP vs Bortezomib-R-CAP for Young Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma With Poor IPI. [NCT01848132]Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-03Completed
Bortezomib in Late Antibody-mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection (BORTEJECT Study) [NCT01873157]Phase 244 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-31Completed
Impact of Proteasome Inhibition on Anti-Donor HLA Antibody Production After Kidney Transplantation [NCT01349595]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study halted due to lack of funding)
Phase II Study of Combination Vorinostat and Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT00837174]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Study never activated/opened as funding source and other support not available.)
Evaluating Study of Clinical Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Based on Analytical Omics [NCT04678089]350 participants (Anticipated)Observational2019-05-16Enrolling by invitation
UARK 2006-15: A Phase III Randomized Study of Tandem Transplants With or Without Bortezomib (Velcade) and Thalidomide (Thalomid) to Evaluate Its Effect on Response Rate and Durability of Response in Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT00574080]Phase 320 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Terminated(stopped due to low accrual)
A Therapeutic Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade), Vorinostat (SAHA) and Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) [NCT01312818]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A National, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study of Velcade in Combination With Melphalan and Prednisone (V-MP) in Older Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients. [NCT00388635]Phase 1/Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-04-30Completed
A Phase II Pilot Study of VELCADE in Patients With MDS [NCT00262873]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Isatuximab in Combination With Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Followed by Isatuximab and Lenalidomide Maintenance in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Severe Renal Impairment (EAE116) [NCT05147493]Phase 251 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-30Not yet recruiting
Phase II Trial of Twice Weekly Induction Followed by Once Weekly IV Velcade (Bortezomib) With Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Following at Least 1 Prior Therapy [NCT00389701]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-03-31Recruiting
Dose Escalation and Phase II Study of Bortezomib (IND #58443) Added to Standard Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Therapy for Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia Age 60-75 Years [NCT00742625]Phase 1/Phase 295 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
An Open-Label Phase 1 Study of Metformin and Nelfinavir in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT03829020]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-17Active, not recruiting
TEAM-Trial: Targeting Epigenetic Therapy Resistance in AML With Bortezomib: A Multi-centre Matched Threshold Crossing Phase II Approach [NCT04173585]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-22Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Escalating Doses of Bortezomib in Conjunction With High Dose Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00784823]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
S0833, Modified Total Therapy 3 (TT3) for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma (MM): A Phase II SWOG Trial for Patients Aged ≤ 65 Years [NCT01055301]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of accrual)
Evaluation of Improvement of Quality of Life in Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated With Velcade (Bortezomib) IV: Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study [NCT01021592]140 participants (Actual)Observational2007-03-31Completed
A Study of Bortezomib With Chemotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT00440726]Phase 1/Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-04Completed
Bortezomib (Velcade®) and Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Lymphoid Malignancies [NCT00439556]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-13Completed
Phase II Trial of Combination Weekly Bortezomib (VELCADE) and Docetaxel (TAXOTERE) in Patients With Recurrent and/ or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) [NCT00425750]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Randomised Evaluation of Molecular Guided Therapy for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma With Bortezomib [NCT01324596]Phase 31,132 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Combination Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, and Rituximab in Previously Untreated Patients With Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia: A Multicenter Trial of the European Myeloma Network [NCT01046006]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-03-31Completed
A Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of Intraperitoneal CTEP-Supplied Agent Bortezomib (PS-341, NSC 681239) and Carboplatin (NSC# 241240) in Patients With Persistent or Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [NCT01074411]Phase 133 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-05Completed
Pilot Study of Daratumumab in Combination With Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients With Renal Failure [NCT06142396]Early Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-01-01Not yet recruiting
DREAMM 7: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (B-Vd) Compared With the Combination of Daratumumab, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone [NCT04246047]Phase 3571 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-05-07Active, not recruiting
A PHASE II MULTI-CENTRE, RANDOMIZED, OPEN LABEL STUDY OF PROLONGED THERAPY WITH SC BORTEZOMIB TWICE MONTHLY ASSOCIATED WITH DEXAMETHASONE, IN RELAPSED AND REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS AFTER SALVAGE WITH BORTEZOMIB-BASED THERAPY. [NCT01913730]Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib (VELCADE®) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) [NCT00182637]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Combination With Rituximab, Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone, and Dexamethasone (VR-FND) for Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma [NCT00510887]Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual.)
Phase I Study of Belinostat (PXD-101) and Velcade (Bortezomib) in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia/ Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01075425]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Sequential Phase II Trial of the Combination of Bortezomib (VELCADE), Dexamethasone (DECADRON) and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (DOXIL) Followed by High Dose Cyclophosphamide in Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT00148317]Phase 238 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of the Novel Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Combination With Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Indolent B-Cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders and Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) [NCT00295932]Phase 1/Phase 279 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-13Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Combination Bortezomib (VELCADE) and Gemcitabine Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B- and T-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00290706]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-07Terminated(stopped due to Closed per Data Monitoring Committee due to lack of efficacy)
An Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of VELCADE for Injection in Subjects With Light-Chain (AL)-Amyloidosis [NCT00298766]Phase 1/Phase 270 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
Phase II Pilot Study of Bortezomib (VELCADE®) and Gemcitabine for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00262860]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Effect of Low Dose Bortezomib on Bone Formation in Smoldering Myeloma Patients [NCT00983346]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Lab Staff that was required left the institution, therefore accrual closed prematurely)
Observational Study of Osteoblast Activity in Velcade�(Bortezomib) IV Treated Multiple Myeloma Patients. [NCT01026701]104 participants (Actual)Observational2008-03-31Completed
Bortezomib + Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Doxil) + Dexamethasone Followed by Thalidomide + Dexamethasone or Bortezomib + Thalidomide + Dexamethasone for Patients With Symptomatic Untreated High-Risk or Primary Resistant Multiple Myeloma [NCT00458705]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Weekly Docetaxel and Bortezomib (Velcade; PS-341) in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00193232]Phase 250 participants Interventional2004-05-31Completed
Pilot Study With Bortezomib in Combination With Rituximab Standard Therapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma and at Least 2 Previous Therapies [NCT01902862]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated(stopped due to Recruitment too slow)
A Randomized, Controlled Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Optimized Retreatment and Prolonged Therapy With Bortezomib (Velcade) in Patients With Multiple Myeloma in First or Second Relapse. [NCT01910987]Phase 380 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Completed
A Randomized, National, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase III Trial Studying Induction Therapy With Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone (VRD-GEM), Followed by High-dose Chemotherapy With Melphalan-200 (MEL-200) Versus Busulfan-melphalan (BUMEL), and Consol [NCT01916252]Phase 3460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
A Phase I Study of Bortezomib During Maintenance Phase After High Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00288028]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A Phase I/II Trial of Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Hoosier Cancer Research Network MM08-141 [NCT01177683]Phase 1/Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of accrual)
Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib (VELCADE) Plus Rituximab-HyperCVAD Alternating With Bortezomib Plus Rituximab-High Dose Methotrexate/Cytarabine in Patients With Untreated Aggressive Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00477412]Phase 1/Phase 2107 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-03Completed
A Phase I Evaluation of the Combination of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Doxil®) With PS-341 in Patients With Refractory Hematologic and Solid Malignancies [NCT00237627]Phase 1/Phase 2107 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-05-31Completed
Phase II Study of VELCADE in Patients With Extranodal Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma of MALT-Type Pretreated With More Than One Prior Systemic Therapy Regimen (X05142) [NCT00210392]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated(stopped due to After IELSG25A study amendment, patients subject of the present study were eligible for inclusion in the IELSG25A study)
Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib and Low Dose Cytarabine in the Treatment of High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00411905]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants Interventional2006-06-30Recruiting
Phase II Study to Evaluate the Role of Bortezomib in the Management of Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia [NCT01950611]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-05-31Recruiting
A Study of Low-dose Lenalidomide After Non-myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant With Bortezomib as GVHD Prophylaxis in High Risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT01954784]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-07Terminated(stopped due to Funding unavailable)
An Interventional, Prospective Open-Label Study of Immunosuppressive Therapies to Mitigate Immune-Mediated Loss of Therapeutic Response to Asfotase Alfa (STRENSIQ®) for Hypophosphatasia (RESTORE) [NCT06015750]Phase 48 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-20Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Open Label Study Of Panobinostat In Combination With Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, And Dexamethasone In Patients With Relapsed And Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01965353]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Open-label, Multicenter Phase II Study of Bortezomib for Maintenance Therapy in Patients With High Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma [NCT01965977]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-08Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Two-Stage, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study Comparing Mezigdomide (CC-92480), Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (MEZIVd) Versus Pomalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) [NCT05519085]Phase 3810 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-09-20Recruiting
"A PHASE III STUDY OF VELCADE (BORTEZOMIB) THALIDOMIDE DEXAMETHASONE (VTD) VERSUS VELCADE (BORTEZOMIB) CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE DEXAMETHASONE (VCD) AS AN INDUCTION TREATMENT PRIOR TO AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE M [NCT01971658]Phase 3358 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-10-31Completed
Phase II Study of Daratumumab Based Response Adapted Therapy for Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT04151667]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-22Active, not recruiting
A Comparative Study of Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethason and Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethason in the Treatment of Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial(BTD-CHINA-TRIAL) [NCT04612582]Phase 470 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-01Recruiting
A Phase I Trial of Duvelisib in Combination With Either Romidepsin or Bortezomib in Relapsed/Refractory T-cell Lymphomas [NCT02783625]Phase 1114 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-05-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of Bortezomib With or Without Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in Combination With Fludarabine (FLU) and Melphalan (MEL) as a Preparative Regimen for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) T [NCT01163357]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase I/II Study of VELCADE in Combination With Gemcitabine in Relapsed B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00863369]Phase 1/Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid and Bortezomib in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas [NCT00937495]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Prospective Assessment of the Cardiac Effects the Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Patients Undergoing Therapy for Multiple Myeloma [NCT02026505]11 participants (Actual)Observational2014-03-01Completed
Phase Ⅱ Study of G-CSF, Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02027220]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-12-31Recruiting
Phase 2, Open-Label Randomized Study of Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone vs Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT04268498]Phase 2306 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-02-11Recruiting
Phase I Study of Weekly Bortezomib (VELCADE, PS-341) and Weekly Topotecan (HYCAMTIN) in Solid Tumor Patients With an Emphasis on Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) [NCT00388089]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study of PS-341 in Combination With 5-FU/LV in Solid Tumors [NCT00007878]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-09-30Completed
An Open-label Phase II Study of the Efficacy of Combination Bortezomib-containing Regimens in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Patients With t (4; 14) Positive Multiple Myeloma [NCT00570180]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-25Completed
UARK 2007-01, A Phase II Pilot Study of the Combination of Melphalan, Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (MEL-VTD) and Autologous Transplantation for Patients Relapsing or Progressing After Tandem Transplantation [NCT00577668]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Poor accrual)
A Phase I Dose Escalating Study of Bortezomib and Lenalidomide in Patients With Untreated or Previously Treated, Primary and Secondary Non 5q- Del Myelodysplasia [NCT00580242]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Phase I Trial of Dacarbazine and Bortezomib in Melanoma and Soft Tissue Sarcoma [NCT00580320]Phase 117 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
MINIALO-VELCADE2005: A Phase II National, Open-label, Multicenter, no Controlled Study of Treated With Bortezomib (Velcade) Multiple Myeloma Patients Pre and Post Allogeneic Haematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplant With no Myeloablative Conditioning [NCT00564200]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
Phase I/II Study of Arsenic Trioxide (Trisenox), Ascorbic Acid and Bortezomib Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00590603]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual - terminated during Phase I; Phase II never started.)
A Phase I Study to Investigate the Safety and Clinical Activity of Idelalisib in Combination With Chemotherapeutic Agents, Immunomodulatory Agents and Anti-CD20 mAb in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Mantle Cell [NCT01088048]Phase 1241 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-25Completed
A Phase II, Multi-center, Single Arm, Open Label Study of Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and Bortezomib-refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01083602]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide, Subcutaneous Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Combination Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02219178]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-11-30Completed
Phase II Study of Subcutaneous (SC) Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma; Followed by SC Bortezomib Maintenance [NCT01647165]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-11Withdrawn
Pharmacologic Pretransplant Immunosuppression (PTIS) + Reduced Toxicity Conditioning (RTC) Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Inherited Hematologic Disorders [NCT05293509]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-03-02Withdrawn(stopped due to 0 accrual)
Lead-In and Phase II Study of Clofarabine, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide [CEC], Liposomal Vincristine (VCR), Dexamethasone and Bortezomib in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LL) [NCT03136146]Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-08-09Recruiting
Ibrutinib (Imbruvica®), Bortezomib (Velcade®) s.c., Rituximab, CHOP for the Treatment of Elderly Patients (Age 61-80 Years) With CD20+ Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, IPI ≥ 2 [NCT03129828]Phase 1/Phase 234 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-17Active, not recruiting
Phase 3 Study Comparing Daratumumab, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (DVd) vs Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02136134]Phase 3499 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-15Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer With PTEN Deletion [NCT06029998]Phase 222 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Not yet recruiting
Bortezomib-based Graft-Versus-Host-Disease Prophylaxis After Myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients Lacking HLA-matched Related Donors: A Phase 2 Study [NCT01323920]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib, Liposomal Doxorubicin, Dexamethasone, and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Relapsing Within 12 Months of Autologous Stem Cell Transplant [NCT01078441]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Terminated(stopped due to The study was closed early due to weak accrual on June 26, 2012.)
Phase II Study of Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 For Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B Cell Lymphomas Previously Treated With Chemotherapy [NCT00038571]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-31Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label Trial Using Velcade for ReTreatment of Multiple Myeloma Subjects Following an Initial Response to Velcade [NCT00431769]Phase 2130 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Assessment of Molecular Remission by ASO-RQ-PCR Technique After Induction Treatment With Bortezomib-dexamethasone (Vel/Dex) Followed by HDT With ASCT [NCT00861250]Phase 2/Phase 347 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Completed
An International Single-Arm Study to Provide Further Safety and Efficacy Data on the Bortezomib(Velcade)/Melphalan/Prednisone Regimen in Previously Untreated Transplant Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT00799539]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
Phase I Study of Induction Therapy With VELCADE and Vorinostat in Patients With Surgically Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00731952]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Phase II Study Investigating the Efficacy of VELCADE®, Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide and Decadron (VRCD Regimen) in Front-line Therapy of Patients With Low-grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00413959]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Terminated
Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone Induction Therapy Followed by Low Dose Melphalan, Prednisone, Lenalidomide and Bortezomib Sequential Maintenance Therapy for Newly Diagnosed High-risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT00691704]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
A Targeted Ph I/II Trial of ZD6474 (Vandetanib; CAPRELSA) Plus the Proteasome Inhibitor, Bortezomib (Velcade ), in Adults With Solid Tumors With a Focus on Hereditary or Sporadic, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Ca (MTC) [NCT00923247]Phase 1/Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-19Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to slow accrual,primary endpoint reached & investigator left NIH.)
Phase I/II Trial of Sorafenib and Weekly Bortezomib in the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00536575]Phase 1/Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-30Completed
S0629, Observational Study of Asymptomatic Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia and Phase II Study of Tandem Autologous Transplant and Maintenance Treatment for Patients With Symptomatic Disease [NCT00723658]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Withdrawn(stopped due to lack of accrual)
A Two Stage, Open Label, Phase II Study of VELCADE Plus ELOXATIN in Previously Treated Patients With Malignant Pleural or Peritoneal Mesothelioma [NCT00996385]Phase 229 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-09-30Recruiting
A Phase II Single Arm Study of VELCADE and DOXIL (PLD) in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With VELCADE [NCT00706953]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Withdrawn
A Phase II Study of Fludarabine, Velcade and Rituximab for Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Hoosier Oncology Group LYM08-134 [NCT01186458]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual)
A Phase II Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide (DVD-R) for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01160484]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Phase II Trial Evaluating the Effects of Bortezomib in Patients With Recurrent Malignant Gliomas Treated Prior to Surgery and Then Bortezomib and Temozolomide Post-operatively [NCT00990652]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Phase I Study of Vidaza and Velcade (Bortezomib) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00624936]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Combination Therapy as Induction Followed by Bortezomib and Lenalidomide Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed High Risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT03641456]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-25Recruiting
A Phase 3 Study of Velcade (Bortezomib) Dexamethasone (VD) Versus Velcade (Bortezomib) Thalidomide Dexamethasone (VTD) as an Induction Treatment Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00910897]Phase 3205 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-03-31Active, not recruiting
The Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide Plus Dexamethasone Combinated With Rituximab or Bortezomib for the Newly Diagnosed Waldenström Macroglobulinemia - a Prospective Multicentre Randomized Control Trial From China [NCT02844322]Phase 4110 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-05-31Recruiting
A Phase I Study Using Tacrolimus, Sirolimus and Bortezomib as Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Transplantation [NCT00670423]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-16Completed
Velcade Therapy for Severe IgA Nephropathy [NCT01103778]Phase 411 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
Effect of Ketoconazole Administration on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bortezomib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00129207]Phase 10 participants InterventionalCompleted
Phase II Trial of Bortezomib and Rituximab for Patients With Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders (PTLD) [NCT00869323]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Funding unavailable)
A Pilot Study Of Weekly Subcutaneous Bortezomib In Patients With Steroid-Refractory Or -Dependent Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease [NCT01672229]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of PS341 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies and Varying Degrees of Renal Dysfunction for the CTEP-Sponsored Organ Dysfunction Working Group [NCT00054483]Phase 169 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Phase 1/2 Open-label Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Preliminary Efficacy of TH-302, A Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug, and Dexamethasone With or Without Bortezomib or Pomalidomide in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01522872]Phase 1/Phase 298 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2012-02-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Proposal to Test the Efficacy and Tolerability of Bortezomib in Pulmonary Chronic GVHD [NCT01163786]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-07Terminated(stopped due to Study was closed due to low accrual before the accrual goal was reached)
Phase I Study of Bortezomib and Cetuximab Without or With Cisplatin in Combination With Radiation Therapy for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer [NCT00629226]Phase 146 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
Bortezomib* and Vorinostat as Maintenance Therapy After Autologous Transplant for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using R-BEAM or BEAM Conditioning Transplant Regimen [NCT00992446]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-02Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of CNTO 328 (Anti-IL-6 Monoclonal Antibody) and VELCADE-Melphalan-Prednisone Compared With VELCADE-Melphalan-Prednisone for the Treatment of Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma [NCT00911859]Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
Desensitization for Preformed Anti-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplantation [NCT00908583]Phase 444 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-31Completed
Evaluation of Melphalan+Bortezomib as a Conditioning Regimen for Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants in Multiple Myeloma After Cytoreductive Therapy [NCT00948922]Phase 2124 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-18Completed
Phase I Study of GX15-070 (NSC # 729280) and Bortezomib in Aggressive Relapsed/Recurrent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00538187]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-12-31Terminated
Phase II Trial of Bortezomib With Combination of Gemcitabine, Ifosfamide and Oxaliplatin (GIFOX-B)in Untreated NK/T Cell Lymphoma [NCT02808091]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow recruitment)
Phase 2 Study of Daratumumab Monotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With Stage 3B Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis [NCT04131309]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-23Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of PS-341 in Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (Transitional Cell Cancer of the Bladder, Ureter, and Renal Pelvis) [NCT00066352]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-09-30Completed
IFM 2014-02 Study: A Randomized Phase III Study of Bortezomib-Melphalan 200 Conditioning Regimen Versus Melphalan 200 for Frontline Transplant Eligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02197221]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
A Phase Ib Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Clinical Activity of the Oral AKT Inhibitor GSK2110183 Administered in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple My [NCT01428492]Phase 190 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
A Prospective Open-Label Pilot Trial of PS-341 (Bortezomib; VELCADE) for the Therapy of Symptomatic Advanced Myeloproliferative Disorders [NCT00437086]Early Phase 130 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
Retrospective Evaluation of Re-Treatment With Bortezomib in Subjects With First Relapse After Bortezomib First-Line Therapy [NCT01524445]35 participants (Actual)Observational2011-03-31Completed
Phase I Trial of Weekly Bortezomib (Velcade) in the Treatment of Patients With Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00193557]Phase 240 participants Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of VELCADE® (Bortezomib) With Rituximab in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT00085696]Phase 266 participants Interventional2004-05-31Completed
A Phase I Study of PS-341 in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00006098]Phase 10 participants Interventional2000-04-30Completed
A Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of PS-341 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies and Varying Degrees of Liver Dysfunction for the CTEPSponsored Organ Dysfunction Working Group [NCT00091117]Phase 180 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
UARK 2003-35, A Phase III Study of Bortezomib Versus Bortezomib in Two Doses in Combination With Revlimid™ for Patients Relapsing or Progressing on Total Therapy II (UARK 98-026) [NCT00093028]Phase 3315 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study of VELCADE With Rituximab in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT00093769]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
Phase 2 Study of Desensitization Protocol for Highly Sensitized Wait Listed Patients [NCT01502267]Phase 22 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-01-31Enrolling by invitation
A 24-week, Open-label Extension Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral SCIO-469 in Treatment of Relapsed Refractory Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00095680]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Phase II Open-label Rollover Study for Subjects That Have Participated in an Astellas Sponsored Linsitinib Trial [NCT02057380]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-04-16Completed
Phase I Study of Decitabine (Dacogen) and Bortezomib (Velcade) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia [NCT00703300]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Phase I, Open Label, Dose-escalating Study of the Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 in Combination With Two Schedules of Herceptin, in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER-2 [NCT00199212]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Therapy With PS 341 in Patients With Advanced Stage Non Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00200382]Phase 227 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-05-31Terminated(stopped due to The study did not achieve the statistical success to continue.)
Phase I Trial of the Combination of Bortezomib and Clofarabine in Adults With Refractory Solid Tumors, Lymphomas, or Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT02211755]Phase 175 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-10-06Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Velcade (Bortezomib - PS341) in the Treatment of Patients Over 18 Years With Ph+ Leukemia [NCT00511069]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Phase II Study of VELCADE in Patients With Extranodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma of MALT-type Pretreated With Prior Systemic Therapy Regimen (X05142) [NCT00210327]Phase 233 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Primary Effusion Lymphoma: A Pilot Trial of Bevacizumab and Modified Dose-Adjusted Infusional CDE Chemotherapy Preceded by a Brief Pre-Phase Assessment of Targeted Oncolytic Virotherapy With Bortezomib, Zidovudine and Valganciclovir [NCT00217503]Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
An Open Label Phase II Multicentre Clinical Trial of Single Agent Bortezomib in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma [NCT00513877]Phase 233 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Parallel Randomised Phase II Trial of CHOP Chemotherapy With or Without Bortezomib in Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00513955]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade) + Pemetrexed (Alimta) in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00516100]Phase 1/Phase 262 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-01-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2 Study of Pomalidomide as a Replacement for Lenalidomide for Multiple Myeloma Patients Relapsed or Refractory to a Lenalidomide-Containing Combination Regimen [NCT02188368]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-07Terminated(stopped due to Lack of enrollment)
Proteasomal Inhibition for Patients With Mis-sense Mutated Dysferlin [NCT01863004]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Terminated(stopped due to insufficient enrollment rate)
Primary Treatment of Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia With Bortezomib (Velcade) and Rituximab (Rituxan) Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Collection [NCT00492050]Phase 246 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-02Active, not recruiting
The Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib as First-line Treatment for Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura [NCT05135442]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-12-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2, Randomized Study of Bortezomib/Dexamethasone With or Without Elotuzumab in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01478048]Phase 2185 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Combination Treatment With Vorinostat, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01720875]Phase 216 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-09Completed
Phase II Study of Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Primary Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis [NCT01072773]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
UARK 2005-05, Coagulation-Related Effects of Velcade Treatment in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00569868]11 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Phase I Trial of PS-341 in Advanced Cancers [NCT00004002]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-07-31Completed
Ofatumumab in Combination With Bortesomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Low-Grade Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma [NCT01119794]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Terminated(stopped due to lack of accrual)
A Phase I Study of Ganetespib +/- Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01485835]Phase 18 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Single-Arm, Phase II Study of Vorinostat (V) in Combination With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) and Bortezomib (B) Followed by VB Maintenance in Patients With Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01492881]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Doxil is currently unavailable)
A Phase I/II Trial of Romidepsin (Depsipeptide) and Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed Myeloma [NCT00431990]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-11-30Recruiting
A Post Authorization Study, Designed to Learn More About the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of VELCADE (Bortezomib) in the Netherlands [NCT00440765]331 participants (Actual)Observational2004-11-30Completed
Phase II Study of PS341 (VELCADE) in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). EudraCT Number 2004-002935-23 [NCT00440076]Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
A National, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Phase III Study of Induction Treatment With VBMCP-VBAD/Velcade Versus Thalidomide / Dexamethasone Versus Velcade / Thalidomide / Dexamethasone Followed by High Dose Intensive Therapy With Autolo [NCT00461747]Phase 3390 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
Single-center, Open Label Trial of Bortezomib as add-on Treatment in Relapsing Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder [NCT02893111]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-12-31Completed
"Phase Ib Study of Weekly Cyclophosphamide-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone (CyBorD) With Daratumumab (DARA) in Transplant Eligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM): The CyBorD-DARA Study" [NCT02955810]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-11-30Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of Bortezomib Dexamethasone and High-dose Melphalan in Patients With Relapse After High-dose Melphalan With Autologous Stem Cell Support [NCT00508209]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Multicenter Non-randomized Study to Assess Safety, Toxicity and Clinical Activity of the Association of Bortezomib(VELCADE)With Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Non Follicular and Mantle-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT00509379]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
Phase II, Open-Label, Multi-centre, 2-part Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tipifarnib Plus Bortezomib in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Unfit for Conventional Chemotherapy ( >18 Years) or in Patient [NCT00510939]Phase 272 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-03-31Recruiting
Phase I Clinical Trial of Dose Escalated Bortezomib + ATO (Arsenic Trioxide) + Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen for Multiple Myeloma [NCT00504101]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Temporarily closed to accrual pending availablity of drug.)
Phase I Dose Escalating Trial of VELCADE (PS-341) in Combination With Idarubicin and Cytosine Arabinoside in Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00505700]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study Of PS-341 (NSC 681239) In Patients With Untreated Or Relapsed Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia [NCT00045695]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-08-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Standard-Dose Rituximab, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin and Etoposide (RICE) Plus Bortezomib (Velcade) in a Dose-Escalating Fashion for Patients With Relapsed or Primary Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Who Are Candidates for [NCT00515138]Early Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Investigator left institution. 7 patients accrued and there is insufficient data to analyze.)
A Phase I/II Study of Liposomal Doxorubicin (Doxil)/Melphalan/Bortezomib (Velcade) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00516191]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Withdrawn(stopped due to low accrual)
A Phase III, Randomized Study of Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Dara-VCD) Induction Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant or Dara-VCD Consolidation and Daratumumab Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed AL Amyloid [NCT06022939]Phase 3338 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-31Not yet recruiting
Phenotypic Personalized Medicine: Systematically Optimized Combination Therapy in Multiple Myeloma Using CURATE.AI [NCT03759093]Phase 2/Phase 320 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-09-10Recruiting
A Phase I Study of Samarium Sm-153 Lexidronam Combined With Bortezomib for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00316940]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Phase 1 Study of PXD101 in Combination With Bortezomib (PS-341) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Lymphoma [NCT00348985]Phase 155 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-03-31Completed
A Phase I Trial of PS-341 in Combination With Topotecan in Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies [NCT00541359]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Phase I Study of Bortezomib and Temozolomide in Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00544284]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
An Open Label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Activity and Safety of Daratumumab in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Plasmablastic Lymphoma (DALYA Trial) [NCT04915248]Phase 228 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-11Recruiting
A Phase 1b/2a Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of CC-220 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Other Treatments in Subjects With Multipl [NCT02773030]Phase 1/Phase 2532 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-14Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study of VELCADE in Combination With Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed or Progressed Non Hodgkin's Follicular Lymphoma [NCT01830465]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone Combined With Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Solitary Plasmacytoma [NCT05248633]Phase 2220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-21Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2 Study of the Combination of VELCADE, Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone or Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Non-Germi [NCT01040871]Phase 2164 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
A Phase 3 Study Comparing Daratumumab, VELCADE (Bortezomib), Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (D-VRd) vs VELCADE, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Eligible for High-dose Therapy [NCT03710603]Phase 3690 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-12-14Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of PS-341 in Acute Myeloid Leukemias, Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Blast Phase [NCT00005064]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2000-02-29Completed
A Phase II, Multi-Center, Open Label Study Of Melphalan, Prednisone, Thalidomide And Bortezomib In Advanced And Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT00358020]Phase 230 participants Interventional2004-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of Bortezomib (NSC #681239) + Lenalidomide (Revlimid™, CC-5013) (NSC #703813) for Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00553644]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-11-15Completed
An Open-Label Phase II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide in Combination With Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Treatment of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01481194]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Phase 2 Study of VELCADE in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00063713]Phase 2152 participants Interventional2003-06-30Completed
An Open-Labeled, Randomized Study to Assess Two Different Strategies of Combining Dexamethasone and VELCADE in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Failed Four or More Lines of Therapy [NCT00063791]0 participants Expanded AccessNo longer available
A Phase I/II, Open Label, Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Tolerance and Preliminary Activity of PS-341 Plus Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer Requiring Chemotherapy [NCT00064610]Phase 1/Phase 2102 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Phase I Study of PS-341 (VELCADE) in Combination With 5FU/LV Plus Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer [NCT00098982]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Phase I Study of PS-341 (Velcade, Bortezomib) in Combination With 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies [NCT00103272]Phase 174 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Terminated
A Phase I Trial of PS-341 and Fludarabine for Relapsed and Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia [NCT00068315]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Two-Stage, Phase II Study Of PS-341 (LDP-341, NSC # 681239) In Patients With Unresectable Or Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma [NCT00074009]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-10-31Completed
Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of Bortezomib in Combination With Thalidomide in Patients With Myelodysplasia [NCT00271804]Phase 128 participants Interventional2005-06-30Terminated(stopped due to New study with lenalidomide pending)
Phase II Trial of PS-341 in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00077441]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
Phase I Trial of Bortezomib (VELCADE™) and Celecoxib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00290680]Phase 136 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00291538]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Repeat-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00080405]Phase 140 participants Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Phase II Trial of PS-341 (Bortezomib, NSC-681239) Followed by the Addition of Gemcitabine at Progression in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma [NCT00305734]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
An Open-label Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral SCIO-469 in Treatment of Relapsed, Refractory Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00087867]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
Phase I Trial of Bortezomib (PS-341; NSC 681239) and Alvocidib (Flavopiridol NSC 649890) in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Indolent B-Cell Neoplasms [NCT00082784]Phase 193 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Phase I Study of SAHA in Combination With Bortezomib in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00310024]Phase 140 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
UARK 2008-03 Phase II Trial for Patients Not Qualifying for TT4 and TT5 Protocols Because of Prior Therapy (No Prior Transplant) [NCT00871013]Phase 2160 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-03-31Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of First Line Bortezomib, Rituximab, Ibrutinib (B-RI) for Patients With Treatment Naive Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia [NCT03620903]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-11Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Neoadjuvant Bortezomib in Combination With Docetaxel and Cisplatin Followed by Surgery in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. [NCT00313690]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Recruitment difficulties)
Velcade®, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone (VTD) Induction Therapy Followed By Melphalan, Prednisone, Thalidomide (MPT) Maintenance As a First Line Treatment For The Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Non-Transplant Candidates [NCT00320476]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
A Phase I Study Evaluating Combined Zevalin (Ibritumomab Tiuxetan) and Valcade (Bortezomib) in Relapsed/Refractory Low-Grade or Follicular B-Cell and Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00334438]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Alimta® (Pemetrexed) Plus VELCADE® (Bortezomib) or Alimta Alone or VELCADE Alone in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Failed Prior Antineoplastic Therapy [NCT00343720]Phase 20 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase II Study of Velcade® (Bortezomib) in Patients Stage IIIB OR IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Have Not Received Prior Chemotherapy [NCT00346645]Phase 246 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-06-30Terminated(stopped due to stopped after planned interim analysis for lack of efficacy)
A Phase I Trial of Bevacizumab and Bortezomib in Patients With Advanced Malignancy [NCT00428545]Phase 1104 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Daratumumab in Combination With Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone Regimens in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma With Renal Dysfunction in Real-World: A Non-interventional Prospective Multicenter Observational Study [NCT05561049]120 participants (Anticipated)Observational2022-10-01Not yet recruiting
EBV as Therapeutic Target: A Pilot Study of Inducing and Targeting EBV-TK in EBV-Positive Lymphomas by Combination of Bortezomib and Ganciclovir [NCT00093704]Phase 11 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Terminated(stopped due to study could not recruit any more patients)
A Phase I Trial Of 17-Allylaminogeldanamycin (17-AAG) And PS341 In Advanced Malignancies [NCT00096005]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-11-30Terminated
A Phase II Combination Trial of PS-341 and 5-FU/LV in Gastric and/or GE Junction Adenocarcinoma [NCT00103103]Phase 20 participants Interventional2005-03-31Terminated
A Phase II Study of VELCADE TM(PS-341) and Irinotecan in the Treatment of Progressive, Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical, Vulvar, or Vaginal Cancer [NCT00106262]Phase 238 participants Interventional2005-03-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of accrual)
A Phase II Trial With VELCADE® (PS-341), Cytoxan (Cyclophosphamide), Dexamethasone and Thalomid® (VEL-CTD) in Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT00438841]Phase 243 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-08-31Active, not recruiting
An Observational Study To Determine Velcade (Bortezomib) Safety and Effectiveness at First Relapse After Participation In First Line HOVON-49/50 Clinical Studies (ADVANCE) [NCT00440479]11 participants (Actual)Observational2006-09-30Completed
International Single-Arm Protocol to Provide Expanded Access to Bortezomib for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received at Least 2 Previous Lines of Therapy and Are Refractory to or Have Relapsed After Their Last Therapy for Multiple Myeloma [NCT00440635]641 participants (Actual)Observational2004-01-31Completed
Bortezomib-Doxorubicin-Dexamethasone as Treatment for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Presenting With Acute Renal Failure [NCT00401804]Phase 272 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
A Phase II Study of Combination of Velcade, Doxil, and Dexamethasone (VDd) as First Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma [NCT00116961]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
A Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of VELCADE (Bortezomib) for Injection in Previously Treated Patients With Stage IIIB and IV Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma With Bronchioloalveolar Features [NCT00117351]Phase 20 participants Interventional2005-04-30Terminated(stopped due to insufficient efficacy)
A Phase I/II Study of 153 Sm EDTMP (Quadramet™) and PS-341 (Velcade®) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00478075]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Phase 1b Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Intravenous Modakafusp Alfa as Part of Combination Therapy in Adult Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT05556616]Phase 1120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-27Active, not recruiting
Phase I Study of a Combination of Doxil, Velcade, and Gemcitabine in Advanced Cancer [NCT00500422]Phase 1134 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
Study of Efficacy of PAD-regimen(Bortezomib,Pirarubicin and Dexamethasone) and TAD-regimen(Thalidomide,Pirarubicin and Dexamethasone) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma,Influence in Concentration of Bone Metabolites,and the Relations With Different Cytog [NCT01249690]Phase 4100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-06-30Recruiting
A Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib (Velcade™) Combined With ACVBP Regimen in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma [NCT00136565]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-08Completed
An Open-Label Phase I Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib in Combination With CC-5013 in the Treatment of Subjects With Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00153933]Phase 158 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-08-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade) After Allogenic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell or Bone Marrow Transplantation for Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00504634]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Sequential VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) and VTD (Velcade, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone) Induction Followed by HDT With ASCT and Maintenance Treatment With Velcade for Newly Diagnosed MM [NCT00378755]Phase 262 participants Interventional2006-03-31Recruiting
A Phase I Study of PS-341 (Bortezomib, Velcade) and Interferon-alpha-2b in Malignant Melanoma. [NCT01462773]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
Comparison Between Rituximab + PLX + IVIG With and Without Bortezomib in the Treatment of Antibody Mediated Kidney Transplanted Rejection [NCT03737136]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-11-01Recruiting
A Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib (VELCADE), and Dexamethasone (R-CYBOR-D) in Relapsed Low Grade and Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT00711828]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Tandem Autologous HCT/Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic HCT From HLA-Matched Related and Unrelated Donors Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy for Patients With High-Risk Multiple Myeloma [NCT00793572]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Combination High Dose Melphalan and Autologous PBSC Transplant With Bortezomib for Multiple Myeloma: A Dose and Schedule Finding Study [NCT00793650]Phase 1/Phase 239 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Terminated
Phase II Study of Vorinostat (SAHA, Zolinza) and Bortezomib (PS341, Velcade) as Third-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00798720]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
A Phase II Study To Determine The Safety and Efficacy Of The Combination of Vorinostat and Bortezomib In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory T-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00810576]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated due to slow accrual.)
Phase II Trial of Velcade (Bortezomib) in Combination With Temozolomide and Regional Radiation Therapy for Upfront Treatment of Patients With Newly-diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT00998010]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-03Completed
A Multicenter Prospective Phase II Study of Rituximab Combined, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia [NCT03697356]Phase 254 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-03-06Recruiting
A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Three Different Peripheral Stem Cell Mobilization Regimens in Patients With Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma or Lymphoma [NCT01146834]Phase 347 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-31Completed
A Phase III, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belantamab Mafodotin in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (B-Pd) Versus Pomalidomide Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Participants With R [NCT04484623]Phase 3357 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-01Recruiting
Pilot Study of Bortezomib/Dexamethasone (BD), Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Maintenance Bortezomib/Dexamethasone For the Initial Treatment of Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Deposition Disease (MIDD) Associated With Multiple Myeloma and A [NCT01383759]20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-06-24Completed
A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00473590]Phase 2102 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-06-30Completed
Phase II Trial of Induction Therapy With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Followed by High-Dose Melphalan and Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With AL Amyloidosis [NCT01083316]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Phase I-II Study of Avastin®+ Bortezomib for Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Non-Squamous NSCLC [NCT00411593]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Lack of Patient Accrual)
AMN006 - Phase 2 Study of Daratumumab in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Transplant Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT03695744]Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-10-02Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of GCS-100 in Subjects With Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00609817]Phase 19 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of funding)
A Phase II Study of Velcade and Temsirolimus for Relapsed or Refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01281917]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-28Completed
The Efficacy of Velcade on Bone Tissue During Myelomatosis (Bone Marrow Cancer) [NCT00436059]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone as Treatment and Maintenance for Multiple Myeloma Relapse An Australian Myeloma Forum Multi-Centre Phase II Trial [NCT00335348]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of ATN-224 and Bortezomib in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Relapsed From or Refractory to Bortezomib [NCT00352742]Phase 1/Phase 246 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-06-30Terminated
Phase-I Study of Bortezomib (VELCADE) Plus ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide) for Patients With Relapsed Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT00439361]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
A National, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Phase III Study of Induction Treatment With Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade Versus Thalidomide / Prednisone / Velcade and Maintenance Treatment With Thalidomide / Velcade Versus Prednisone / Velcad [NCT00443235]Phase 3260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
[NCT01248923]Phase 155 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-12-31Completed
Phase II Study of Bortezomib Consolidation After High Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma [NCT01517724]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Low Dose Dexamethasone for Induction, in Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma [NCT01530594]Phase 3440 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Pilot Study of G-CSF to Disrupt the Bone Marrow Microenvironment in Bortezomib-, Carfilzomib-, or IMID-Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01537861]Early Phase 17 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Unexpected toxicity (2 early deaths))
Phase II Trial of Bortezomib and Bendamustine in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma [NCT01315873]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to PI left the institution before all data analysis was completed)
Randomised Comparisons, in Myeloma Patients of All Ages, of Thalidomide, Lenalidomide, Carfilzomib and Bortezomib Induction Combinations, and of Lenalidomide and Combination Lenalidomide Vorinostat as Maintenance (Myeloma XI) [NCT01554852]Phase 34,420 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of the Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and B-cell Lymphoproliferative Disorders [NCT00006362]Phase 10 participants Interventional1999-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of PS-341 in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Lower Esophagus, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Gastric Cardia [NCT00107341]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
Phase I Evaluation of the Safety of PS 341 in the Treatment of Recurrent Gliomas [NCT00006773]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of VELCADE/Melphalan/Prednisone Versus Melphalan/Prednisone in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma [NCT00111319]Phase 30 participants Interventional2004-12-31Completed
UARK 2005-01, A Phase III Study of Velcade, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VTD) With or Without Adriamycin® in Relapsed/Refractory Patients [NCT00111748]Phase 3180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-02-28Completed
A Phase II Trial of Docetaxel Plus Cetuximab and Docetaxel Plus Bortezomib (NSC #681239, IND #58443) in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Performance Status (PS) 2 [NCT00118183]Phase 262 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
A 3-Arm Randomized Phase II Study of Standard-of-Care vs. Bortezomib Based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Regimen for Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients Lacking HLA-matched Related Donors [NCT01754389]Phase 2138 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Subcutaneous Bortezomib in Combination With Chemotherapy (VXLD) for Relapsed/Refractory Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia [NCT01769209]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Phase II Study of a Proteasome Inhibitor, PS-341 (NSC 681239) in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) in Chronic or Accelerated Phase [NCT00023881]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-02Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy)
A Phase I Study of Concomitant Therapy With Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 and Radiation in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck [NCT00011778]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-02-22Completed
A Phase I Study of PS-341 (NSC 681239), Carboplatin, and Etoposide in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Refractory to Standard Therapy [NCT00027898]Phase 127 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-01-31Completed
Phase I Trial of Bortezomib (NSC 681239, IND#58443) and Carboplatin in Recurrent or Progressive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer or Primary Peritoneal Cancer [NCT00028912]Phase 10 participants Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Phase II Study of PS-341 in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors [NCT00017199]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-04-30Completed
A Phase II Study Of PS-341 In Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00040768]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
A Phase II Study Of PS-341 In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer [NCT00052507]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase II Study Of VELCADE Alone Or VELCADE Plus Docetaxel In Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00064012]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
A Phase I, Open Label, Dose Escalation Study of PS-341 Plus Docetaxel in Treatment-Naive or Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer or Other Solid Tumors [NCT00064636]Phase 146 participants Interventional2002-12-31Terminated
A Phase II Study Of PS-341 (VELCADE) In Chemotherapy-Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) [NCT00066508]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-05-31Completed
A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin™) in Combination With Bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade™) in Patients With Advanced Malignancy [NCT00066625]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Administratively complete.)
A Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine, Carboplatin and PS-341 (NSC-681239) in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [NCT00075751]Phase 299 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Phase II Trial of PS-341 (NSC 681239) Followed by the Addition of Doxorubicin at Progression in Advanced Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck [NCT00077428]Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Phase I Study of PS-341 (Velcade, Bortezomib) in Pediatric Patients With Refractory/Recurrent Leukemias [NCT00077467]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone for Acquired Pure Red Cell Aplasia Failure or Relapse After First-line Treatment: A Prospective Phase II Trial [NCT04423367]Phase 217 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-09-13Recruiting
A Phase II Study of PS-341 (Bortezomib) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00082966]Phase 243 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Velcade™ in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular B-Cell Lymphoma [NCT00136591]Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Terminated(stopped due to An arm closed due to lack of efficacy)
Phase II Study of Velcade in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia [NCT00142129]Phase 227 participants Interventional2003-12-31Completed
VELCADEXA: A National, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study of Pretransplant Induction With Alternating VELCADE and Dexamethasone (VEL/Dex) in Younger (< 65 Yrs) Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients. [NCT00391157]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Phase I Study Of PS-341 In Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors [NCT00021216]Phase 136 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Velcade/Dexamethasone/Cyclophosphamide(PCD) Versus Rituximab /Dexamethasone/Cyclophosphamide(RCD) for the Treatment of Patients With Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia [NCT02971982]Phase 1/Phase 240 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2016-10-31Recruiting
Phase II Trial Of PS-341 In Metastatic Breast Cancer [NCT00025584]Phase 235 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-08-31Completed
A Phase I and Pharmacologic Study of the Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00028587]Phase 196 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-12-31Completed
A Phase II Dose-Response Study of Velcade® and Bone Formation in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00128921]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-04-30Terminated(stopped due to study terminated due to low accrual)
Pilot Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of Velcade (Bortezomib) and Pravastatin for the Treatment of Relapsed Leukemia Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children [NCT02484261]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Contractual/Funding/Accrual)
A Phase I and Pharmacodynamic Study of Proteasome Inhibitor, PS-341, in Combination With Doxorubicin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors [NCT00023855]Phase 10 participants Interventional2001-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of PS-341 in the Treatment of Metastatic Malignant Melanoma [NCT00024011]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 2b Study of VELCADE Alone and VELCADE Plus Irinotecan in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Colorectal Carcinoma [NCT00051987]Phase 2175 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study Of PS-341 In Combination With Gemcitabine And Carbloplatin In Selected Stage IIIB Or IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00052338]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-09-30Completed
A Randomized Phase II Trial of PS-341 and Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [NCT00052689]Phase 288 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Impact of First Autologous Transplant on Minimal Residual Disease Markers in Previously Untreated Myeloma Undergoing Initial Treatment With Velcade Based Therapy [NCT01215344]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Phase II Trial of PS-341 in Patients With Renal Cell Cancer [NCT00025376]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-10-31Completed
A Phase II Randomized Study of Three Subcutaneous Bortezomib-based Consolidation Treatments for Patients Completing Induction Therapy and Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01706666]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-07Completed
A Multi-Institutional, Open-Label, Two-Group, Phase II Study of PS-341 (LDP-341, NSC #681239) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Sarcoma [NCT00027716]Phase 20 participants Interventional2001-10-31Completed
A Phase I Study of PS-341 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Metastatic Solid Tumors [NCT00030368]Phase 145 participants (Actual)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Phase I Study of Weekly Intravenous PS-341 (Bortezomib) Plus Mitoxantrone in Patients With Advanced Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer (AI-PCa) [NCT00059631]Phase 142 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-03-20Completed
An International, Non-Comparative, Open-Label Study of PS-341 Administered to Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Experienced Relapsed or Progressive Disease After Receiving at Least Four Previous Treatment Regimens or Experienced Progressive Disease After [NCT00063726]Phase 3600 participants Interventional2002-04-30Completed
Phase II Trial of PS-341 (Bortezomib) in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma [NCT00072150]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-10-31Completed
A Phase II Trial of PS-341 (NSC-681239) in Patients With Platinum-Treated Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00068289]Phase 20 participants Interventional2003-09-30Completed
A Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of ABT-199 in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Subjects Who Are Receiving Bortezomib and Dexamethasone as Their Standard Therapy [NCT01794507]Phase 166 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-11-19Completed
A Dose Finding Phase I Trial of the Combination of Topotecan and PS-341, a Novel Proteasome Inhibitor, in Advanced Malignancies [NCT00068484]Phase 125 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-07-31Completed
An Extension or Re-Treatment Study of Bortezomib to Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00216697]Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Combination Therapy With VELCADE, Doxil, and Dexamethasone (VDd) in Multiple Myeloma [NCT00135187]30 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Combination With Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00148018]Phase 237 participants Interventional2005-03-31Terminated
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of VELCADE Alone or VELCADE Plus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00051974]Phase 2155 participants Interventional2002-12-31Completed
Phase II Study of the Association of Velcade to R-CHOP in the Treatment of B Cell Lymphoma [NCT00169468]Phase 248 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib (Velcade®, PS-341) and Docetaxel for Patients With Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer [NCT00183937]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-04-30Completed
[NCT00184015]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-18Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of PS-341(Bortezomib)and Carboplatin in Patients With Platinum- and Taxane-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer, Primary Peritoneal Cancer, and Fallopian Tube Cancer [NCT00059618]Phase 121 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Phase I/II Trial of VELCADE® (Bortezomib) in Combination With Mitoxantrone and Etoposide for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemias [NCT00410423]Phase 1/Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-01-31Completed
"Phase II Trial of VIPER Chemotherapy in Relapsed and Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (NHL)" [NCT00504751]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label, Single-arm, Phase II Study of Bortezomib/Dexamethasone Therapy in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma [NCT03487133]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-09-19Completed
Targeted Therapy for High Immunologic Risk Renal Transplant Recipients: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Pilot Study of B-Cell Depleting Therapy in Combination With Anti-Thymocyte Globulin [Rabbit] (Thymoglobulin®, Genzyme), Tacrolimus (Prograf®, Ast [NCT00782821]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
An Open Label Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib (VELCADE), Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (DOXIL), and Dexamethasone, (CVDD) in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00750815]Phase 1/Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Comparing and Combining Bortezomib and Mycophenolate in SSc Pulmonary Fibrosis Grant Number: R34HL122558 [NCT02370693]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
B-Cell Targeted Therapy for Acute Renal Allograft Rejection With an Antibody Mediated Component: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study [NCT00771875]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-09-30Completed
Risk-Adapted Intravenous Melphalan With Stem Cell Transplant and Adjuvant Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for Recently Diagnosed Untreated Patients With Systemic Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis [NCT00458822]Phase 240 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Combination Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma (PLD-BCD) [NCT00849251]Phase 1/Phase 231 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Terminated(stopped due to One of the study drugs is not available.)
A Phase II Study of Subcutaneous (SC) Bortezomib-Regimens for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) Failing Prior Intravenous (IV) Bortezomib-Containing Regimens [NCT01695330]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Terminated by Sponsor of this study.)
Phase II Subcutaneous VELCADE and Oral Cyclophosphamide-based Induction + Sequential VELCADE and Revlimid Maintenance for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in Non-transplant Candidates: An Entirely Non-intravenous Regimen [NCT01729338]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-19Terminated
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Selinexor (KPT-330) in Combination With Backbone Treatments for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02343042]Phase 1/Phase 2518 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Decitabine-Based Induction Strategies for Patients >/= 60 Years Old With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [NCT01420926]Phase 2165 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-16Completed
Phase II Study of Subcutaneous Bortezomib for Patients With Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome [NCT01891968]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-07Completed
A Phase I Study of Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA) in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00227513]Phase 166 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Completed
Etude Multicentrique Ouverte Randomisée de Phase III Comparant l'Association de VELCADE®-Dexaméthasone à la Chimiothérapie de Type VAD Pour le Traitement Des Patients Porteurs de Myélome Multiple de Novo Jusqu'à l'âge de 65 Ans [NCT00200681]Phase 3493 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
[NCT00261612]Phase 216 participants Interventional2005-01-31Active, not recruiting
Consolidation Therapy With Bortezomib in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Aged 61 to 75 [NCT00416208]Phase 3154 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Dose Escalation Study of R115777 (Zarnestra) Combined With Velcade® (PS-341) in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. [NCT00243035]Phase 1/Phase 264 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-08-31Terminated
Phase I Study of PS-341 in Combination With 5-Fluorouracil and External Beam Radiotherapy For The Treatment Of Locally Advanced And Metastatic Rectal Cancer [NCT00280176]Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
Phase I, Open Label, Clinical Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Oral Dovitinib (TKI258) When Given in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT01680796]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-28Withdrawn(stopped due to The target drug, dovitinib, failed as a single agent in prior studies in patients with heavily treated multiple myeloma.)
Evaluation of VELCADE (Botezomib) for Injection Employed as Re-Treatment for Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability [NCT00257114]Phase 40 participants InterventionalCompleted
A Phase I Study of Arsenic Trioxide and Ascorbic Acid (ATO/AA) in Combination With Low Dose Velcade-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone (VTD) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) [NCT00258245]Phase 15 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-05-31Completed
An Open-Label Study to Assess the Effect of Omeprazole Administration on the Pharmacokinetics of VELCADE in Subjects With Either Advanced Solid Tumors or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00298779]Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalCompleted
A Phase II Trial of VELCADE in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma [NCT00367718]Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn(stopped due to PI left JHU and is not able to be reached for updates)
VELCADE (Bortezomib) for Injection - Phase II Study of Bortezomib and Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00265928]Phase 246 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalTerminated(stopped due to Withdrawn for poor accrual)
Consolidation Therapy With Bortezomib <= 60 Year Old Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00416273]Phase 3217 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
An Open-Label Randomized Study of Subcutaneous and Intravenous VELCADE in Subjects With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma [NCT00722566]Phase 3222 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of VELCADE as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Following High-Dose Melphalan Treatment and Autologous PBSCT (Minimal Residual Disease, Partial Remission or Stable Disease) [NCT00311337]Phase 261 participants Interventional2005-10-31Recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Bortezomib + Ascorbic Acid + Melphalan (BAM) Combination Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00317811]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Randomized, Non-comparative, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of Tarceva™ (Erlotinib) Alone and of Tarceva Plus VELCADE* (Bortezomib) for Injection in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00283634]Phase 20 participants Interventional2005-08-31Terminated(stopped due to insufficient efficacy)
A Phase II Trial of PS-341 in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma [NCT00288041]Phase 236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Phase II Trial of Bendamustine, Bortezomib, and Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Low Grade Lymphoma [NCT01029730]Phase 255 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
2015-12: A Phase II Study Exploring the Use of Early and Late Consolidation/Maintenance With Anti-CD38 (Protein) Monoclonal Antibody to Improve Progression Free Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT03004287]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-07-01Active, not recruiting
Randomized Phase III Trial of Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) Versus Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd) Followed by Limited or Indefinite Duration Lenalidomide Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Mult [NCT01863550]Phase 31,087 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-06Active, not recruiting
Clinical Protocol Bortezomib Consolidation in Patients With Myeloma Following Treatment With High-dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Support. A Randomised NMSG Trial (15/05) [NCT00417911]Phase 3400 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Phase I Study of the Raf Kinase/VEGFR Inhibitor BAY 43-9006 in Combination With the Proteasome Inhibitor PS-341 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT00303797]Phase 150 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-12-31Completed
A Phase I Open-labeled, Dose-escalation, Safety Study of the Combination of Velcade and Chemoradiation for the Treatment of Cancer Patients [NCT00329589]Phase 154 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-09-30Completed
A Multicenter Open-Label Phase II Study of Velcade Combined With High-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00337506]Phase 250 participants Interventional2003-08-31Terminated
Phase I Study of ABT-888 in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Refractory Myeloma [NCT01495351]Phase 119 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Completed
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open Label, Dose-escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide (POM), Bortezomib (BTZ) and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (LDDEX) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) [NCT01497093]Phase 134 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-15Completed
A Phase I Study of the HER1, HER2 Dual Kinase Inhibitor, Lapatinib Plus the Proteosomal Inhibitor Bortezomib in Patients With Advanced Malignancies [NCT01497626]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Drug support withdrawn)
A Phase I Study of Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib in the Treatment of Relapsed and/or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT01504776]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Daratumumab in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Subjects With Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Severe Renal Impairment Including Subjects Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Phase 2, Open-label, Multicenter Trial [NCT02977494]Phase 222 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label Trial of Bortezomib (VELCADE®) in Combination With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT01633645]Phase 253 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-30Completed
UARK 2010-35, A Phase II Study of Expanded Natural Killer Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma [NCT01313897]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-01-31Completed
Short Course of Bortezomib in Anemic Patients With Refractory Cold Agglutinin Disease [NCT01696474]Phase 221 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-31Completed
Phase 1 Clinical Trial of a Novel CDK Inhibitor Dinaciclib (SCH 727965) in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01711528]Phase 141 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-19Completed
A Phase 3 Randomized Study Comparing Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DVRd) Followed by Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (DVRd) Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (AS [NCT05257083]Phase 3750 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-10-10Recruiting
MRD-Guided Sequential Therapy For Deep Response in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma - MASTER-2 Trial [NCT05231629]Phase 2300 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-13Recruiting
A Phase 3, Two-Stage, Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Study Comparing Iberdomide, Daratumumab and Dexamethasone (IberDd) Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd) in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) [NCT04975997]Phase 3864 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-06-23Recruiting
UARK 2008-02, A Phase II Trial for High-risk Myeloma Evaluation Accelerating and Sustaining Complete Remission (AS-CR) by Applying Non-host-exhausting and Timely Dose-reduced MEL-80-VRD-PACE Tandem Transplants [NCT00869232]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Active, not recruiting
Prospective Comparison the Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Newly Diagnosed Patients of Multiple Myeloma in China. [NCT01812096]Phase 1/Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-05-31Active, not recruiting
Desensitization With Bortezomib Before a Living Kidney Donation [NCT01842074]Phase 410 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-03-31Recruiting
A Randomized Controlled Study of Velcade (Bortezomib) Plus Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone Compared to Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Myeloma Patients Progressing or Relapsing After Autologous Transplantation [NCT00256776]Phase 3269 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-07-31Terminated
Phase II Study Assessing the Efficacy and Toxicity of PK--directed Intravenous Busulfan in Combination With High--Dose Melphalan and Bortezomib as Conditioning Regimen for First--Line Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Mul [NCT01605032]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A Phase I-II Study of Infusional Melphalan + Bortezomib for Myeloablative Therapy Prior to Autologous Transplant for Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02353572]Phase 1/Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Principle investigator left the institution)
Phase I/II Study of Combination of Sorafenib, Vorinostat, and Bortezomib for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Complex- or Poor-risk (Monosomy 5/7) Cytogenetics or FLT3-ITD Positive Genotype [NCT01534260]Phase 1/Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-10Completed
A Phase IV, Post Marketing, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study to Investigate Safety and Effectiveness of Alvocade® in Iranian Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT06012383]57 participants (Actual)Observational2016-07-31Completed
A Pilot Study Using High Dose Busulfan and Bortezomib as Part of Allogeneic Transplant Conditioning Regimen for High Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients. [NCT01534143]Phase 21 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Data was not collected, because funding was unavailable to continue study.)
A Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib + CHOP in Patients With Advanced Stage Aggressive T Cell or NK/T Cell Lymphomas [NCT00374699]Phase 1/Phase 255 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2006-04-30Completed
Phase II Study of Bendamustine, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (BBD) for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT02224729]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-25Completed
A Phase I/II Study of a Novel Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00995059]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)InterventionalWithdrawn
International Study for Treatment of High Risk Childhood Relapsed ALL 2010 A Randomized Phase II Study Conducted by the Resistant Disease Committee of the International Berlin, Frankfurt, Münster (BFM) Study Group [NCT03590171]Phase 2250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-01Recruiting
Phase I Trial of Temozolomide, Bevacizumab Plus Bortezomib for Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme [NCT01435395]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Completed
Bortezomib (VELCADE), Cladribine and Rituximab (VCR) in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Phase I/II Study (PSHCI 10-011) [NCT01439750]Phase 113 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Active, not recruiting
Phase I/Ib Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy of Lenalidomide/Bortezomib/Dexamethasone and Panobinostat in Transplant Eligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) [NCT01440582]Phase 177 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-02-18Completed
Assessment of Sensory Disorders Associated With Peripheral Neuropathy Induced by Bortezomib: Prospective Comparative Study [NCT02976272]60 participants (Anticipated)Observational2016-06-07Recruiting
Phase I Study of Bortezomib and Cetuximab Without or With Cisplatin in Combination With Radiation Therapy for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer [NCT01445405]Phase 13 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-05Completed
An Open-Label, Single Arm, Phase Ib/II Study of GSK2110183 in Subjects With Proteasome Inhibitor Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01445587]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Withdrawn(stopped due to Based on the clinical activity, not safety data, of the AKT inhibitor, GSK has decided at this time to suspend further development of GSK2110183 as monotherapy.)
Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab, High-dose Ara-C and Dexamethasone (R-HAD) Alone or in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT01449344]Phase 3128 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-05-09Active, not recruiting
Continuing Treatment for Subjects Who Have Participated in a Prior Protocol Investigating Elotuzumab [NCT02719613]Phase 267 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-15Active, not recruiting
Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (D-RVd) Versus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVd) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Eligible for High-Dose Chemotherapy [NCT02874742]Phase 2224 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-08-29Completed
A Phase II Study of Weekly Maintenance Bortezomib and Rituximab in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Post Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [NCT01267812]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-03Completed
European Myeloma Network Sequential Phase I / Phase II Trial on RIC Allogeneic Transplantation: an Optimized Program for High Risk Relapsed Patients [NCT01460420]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Phase 1/2 Study of VELCADE (Bortezomib), Nipent (Pentostatin), and Rituxan (Rituximab) (VNR) in Subjects With Relapsed Follicular, Marginal Zone, and Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT01460602]Phase 1/Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Investigator has relocated to MD Anderson)
A Phase 1b Dose Escalation Study of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor (HDACi) JNJ-26481585 in Combination With VELCADE (Bortezomib) and Dexamethasone for Subjects With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01464112]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-16Completed
A Randomized Phase II Study of Bortezomib Plus ICE (BICE) Versus Standard ICE for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT00967369]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-24Completed
A Phase II, Open-Label Study of Bortezomib (Velcade), Cladribine and Rituximab (VCR) in Advanced, Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell and Indolent Lymphomas [NCT00980395]Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-07Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Dose-Adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy With Bortezomib Combined With Integrase Inhibitor Therapy for HTLV-1 Associated T-Cell Leukemia Lymphoma [NCT01000285]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Completed
Phase II Study of Panobinostat (LBH589) Given in Combination With Bortezomib (Velcade) in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer Progressing on Gemcitabine Therapy Alone or Gemcitabine in Combination [NCT01056601]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Funding not available)
Bortezomib Plus Rituximab for EBV + Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD) [NCT01058239]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Single Weekly Administration of Bortezomib in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01090921]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
A Phase 2 Study of Daratumumab, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (DVd), Followed by Daratumumab, Ixazomib, and Dexamethasone (DId) for Relapsed and/or Refractory Myeloma [NCT03763162]Phase 260 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-17Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-comparative, Open-label, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Effects of the Combination of Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid on Bone Mineral Density, Bone Metabolism, Radiographically-detected Osteolytic Bone Lesions, Ske [NCT00972959]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Phase I/II Open-label Multicenter Study of AT7519M Alone and in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma [NCT01183949]Phase 1/Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
Bone Effect of Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01062230]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow accrual; PI left primary institution)
Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Anemia From HLA Matched or Partially-Matched Related Donors [NCT01350232]2 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
A Phase II Study Incorporating Panobinostat, Bortezomib and Liposomal Vincristine Into Re-Induction Therapy for Relapsed Pediatric T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoma [NCT02518750]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-23Terminated(stopped due to Due to slow accrual)
A Phase 3 Trial Comparing Cyclophosphamide,Bortezomib,and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) and Bortezomib,Doxorubicin,and Dexamethasone (PAD) in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT02362165]Phase 3236 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-04-30Recruiting
A Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study of Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (SVd) Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) [NCT03110562]Phase 3402 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-24Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Liposomal Doxorubicin (Doxil®)/Melphalan/Bortezomib (Velcade®) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00985907]Phase 1/Phase 213 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-28Terminated(stopped due to Low Accrual)
A Phase I Study Using Bortezomib (Velcade, Formerly Known as PS-341) With Weekly Idarubicin for the Treatment of Elderly (>/= 60 Years) and Relapsed Patients With Acute Myelogenous Leukemia [NCT00382954]Phase 155 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2004-02-29Completed
Probiotic Supplementation Reduces Gastrointestinal Symptoms During the Therapy and Improves Therapeutic Response in AL Amyloidosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT05776940]Phase 3116 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase 2 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Bortezomib, Cytarabine, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT02840539]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-10-11Completed
An Open Label, Dose Escalation, Multicenter Phase 1/2 Study of KW-2478 in Combination With Bortezomib in Subjects With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01063907]Phase 1/Phase 295 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
Induction Therapy With Bortezomib-melphalan and Prednisone (VMP) Followed by Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) Versus Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (KRd) Plus/Minus Daratumumab, 18 Cycles, Followed by Consolidation and Maintenance Therapy [NCT03742297]Phase 3462 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-22Active, not recruiting
Phase I/II Study of Combination of Aurora Kinase Inhibitor MLN8237 and Bortezomib in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01034553]Phase 1/Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Multicenter Phase I Study Evaluating the Addition of Bortezomib to an Established Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD) Prophylaxis Regimen in Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (Allo HSCT) Patients [NCT01926899]Phase 115 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-01Completed
Weekly Bendamustine and Bortezomib Combination Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma or B-CLL: A Single-Center Phase 2 Study [NCT00426855]Phase 1/Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Velcade (Bortezomib, PS-341) and Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell and Follicular Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00201877]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-12-31Completed
PS-341 and PS-341 + Epoch Chemotherapy and Molecular Profiling in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas [NCT00054665]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-02-28Completed
S0417 A Phase II Study of Bortezomib (Velcade™, PS-341), Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00124579]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Terminated(stopped due to poor accrual)
Phase II Trial of the Combination of Subcutaneous (SQ) Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD or Doxil or LipoDox) for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) [NCT01736943]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-19Completed
A Phase II Study of Modified Lenalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01782963]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-03-31Completed
Feasibility of Assessing Drug Response to Precise Local Injection of Anti-cancer Drugs Using Presage's CIVO Device in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients Undergoing Surgery. [NCT03056599]Phase 123 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-12-15Completed
A Phase I, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study of CKD-581 in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma [NCT03051841]Phase 118 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Recruiting
Randomized Phase II Study of Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT04277845]Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-06Active, not recruiting
Superiority of the Triple Combinations of Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (VCD) Versus Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (CTD) in Patients With Newly Diagnose Multiple Myeloma, Eligible for Transplantation [NCT03402295]Phase 3311 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-06-15Completed
Phase II Trial pf Bortezomib in Patients With Advanced or Relapsed Lymphoma of the Mucosa Associated Lymphoid Tissue (MALT) Type [NCT00373906]Phase 216 participants (Anticipated)InterventionalCompleted
Phase II Trial of Ofatumumab and Bortezomib in Subjects With Relapsed Cluster of Differentiation Antigen 20 (CD20)+ Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT01397591]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Study closed by PI due to lower than expected accrual.)
A Phase I/II Trial of VR-CHOP for Patients With Untreated Follicular Lymphoma and Other Low Grade B-Cell Lymphomas [NCT00634179]Phase 1/Phase 237 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Subcutaneous Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (BCR) Versus Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) for Initial Therapy of Waldenstrőm's Macroglobulinaemia (WM): a Randomized Phase II Trial [NCT01592981]Phase 260 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-01-31Completed
A Phase 0 Study of Autophagy Induction After Bortezomib For Myeloma [NCT01594242]Early Phase 111 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-10Completed
VELCADE® (Bortezomib) for Injection Therapy for Early Relapsed Prostate Cancer [NCT00103376]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Low Accrual)
MUK Nine b: OPTIMUM. A Phase II Study Evaluating Optimised Combination of Biological Therapy in Newly Diagnosed High Risk Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Leukaemia. [NCT03188172]Phase 295 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-09-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of VELCADE (Bortezomib) in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma [NCT00636792]Phase 273 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
A Phase 1 Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Intravenous TAK-573 as Part of Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT04392648]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-06-24Withdrawn(stopped due to Business Decision (no enrollment))
Phase II and Pharmacodynamic Study of PS-341 in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Bile Duct or Gallbladder [NCT00085410]Phase 220 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Terminated(stopped due to The trial was discontinued early due to no confirmed partial responses.)
Phase I/II Study of PS-341 in Combination With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Concurrent Thoracic Radiation Therapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [NCT00093756]Phase 1/Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of the Combination Bortezomib (Velcade, PS-341), Dexamethasone, and Rituximab in Patients With Waldenstroms Macroglobulinemia [NCT00250926]Phase 223 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-10-31Completed
Phase I/II Trial of VELCADE+ CHOP-Rituximab in Patients With Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B Cell or Mantle Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma [NCT00151320]Phase 1/Phase 276 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
Velcade (Bortezomib) and Sorafenib in Unresected or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma [NCT01100242]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-30Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual)
MC1082: A Phase I/II Trial of Pomalidomide (CC-4047), Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01212952]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-09-30Completed
PS-341 (Bortezomib, Velcade®), Adriamycin and Dexamethasone (PAD) Combination Therapy Followed by Thalidomide With Dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00319865]Phase 247 participants Interventional2005-11-30Recruiting
Phase II Study for the Evaluation of Bendamustine, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (BBD) in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Not Candidates for High Dose Chemotherapy [NCT01056276]Phase 259 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Phase 2 Trial of Bortezomib in KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Never Smokers or Those With KRAS G12D [NCT01833143]Phase 217 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-11Completed
Isatuximab in Combination With Bortezomib and Lenalidomide With Minimal Dexamethasone in Transplant-ineligible Multiple Myeloma [NCT04939844]Phase 251 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-06-29Active, not recruiting
A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of R115777 (Tipifarnib) Plus PS-341 (Bortezomib) in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemias [NCT00383474]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Prospective Observation of Bortezomib in the Treatment of Glomerular Diseases [NCT05383547]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-08-02Recruiting
A Phase I-II Study of High-Dose Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib and Abatacept for the Prevention of Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD) Following Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) [NCT05289167]Phase 1/Phase 274 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-03-13Recruiting
An Exploratory Trial to Estimate the Proportion of Patients With Tumor Cell Contaminated, Flow Positive Leukapheresis Products Collected With and Without Bortezomib as In-vivo Purging Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Harvest for Multiple Myeloma [NCT02703779]Phase 2101 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-03-31Completed
An Open Label, Single Arm, Multi-Center Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SVRd for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Presenting With Extramedullary Disease. [NCT05900882]Phase 235 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-15Recruiting
A Phase 2b, Open-label Study of Selinexor Plus Low-dose Dexamethasone (Sd) in Patients With Penta-refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM), Selinexor and Bortezomib Plus Low-dose Dexamethasone (SVd) in Patients With Triple-class Refractory MM, and Selinexor and P [NCT04414475]Phase 2141 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-07-01Recruiting
A Phase 1b Study of REOLYSIN® (Reovirus Serotype 3 - Dearing Strain) Combined With Standard Doses of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02514382]Phase 114 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-21Completed
A Phase 1/2, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Safety and Tolerability Study of INCB052793 in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies [NCT02265510]Phase 1/Phase 283 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-09-10Terminated
A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, OPEN LABEL STUDY COMPARING TWO STANDARD TREATMENTS, BORTEZOMIB-MELPHALAN-PREDNISONE (VMP) WITH OR WITHOUT DARATUMUMAB (Dara-VMP) VS LENALIDOMIDE-DEXAMETHASONE (Rd) WITH OR WITHOUT DARATUMUMAB (Dara-Rd) IN AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TR [NCT03829371]Phase 4450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-01-03Recruiting
A 3-Arm Randomized Phase II Trial of Bendamustine-Rituximab (BR) Followed by Rituximab vs Bortezomib-BR (BVR) Followed by Rituximab vs BR Followed by Lenalidomide/Rituximab in High Risk Follicular Lymphoma [NCT01216683]Phase 2289 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-02-09Completed
A PHASE III, MULTI-CENTER, RANDOMIZED OPEN LABEL STUDY OF VELCADE, MELPHALAN, PREDNISONE AND THALIDOMIDE (V-MPT) Versus VELCADE, MELPHALAN, PREDNISONE (V-MP) IN ELDERLY UNTREATED MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS [NCT01063179]Phase 3511 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
A Dose Escalation of Zarnestra (R115777) Combined With Velcade® (PS-341) in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00361088]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Terminated(stopped due to Initial Principal Investigator left Moffitt)
Phase II Study of CHOP/Rituxan Plus VELCADE in Mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma [NCT00361621]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Closed due to slow accrual)
A Pilot Study of Mitoxantrone-Based Four Drug Reinduction in Combination With Bortezomib for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma in Children and Young Adults [NCT02535806]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Funding source discontinued)
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation vs. Conventional Therapy as Salvage Therapy for Relapsed / Progressive Patients With Multiple Myeloma After First-line Therapy [NCT05675319]Phase 3482 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-03-03Recruiting
A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Two-Parallel Arm Study Evaluating the Overall Efficacy and Safety of Desensitization Therapy on Selected Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation [NCT01769443]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Inability to enroll within funding period)
A Multicenter Phase II Study of Ofatumumab and Bortezomib (OB) in Previously Untreated Patients With Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia [NCT01536067]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Terminated(stopped due to funding was withdrawn)
An Open-label, Randomised Trial of Bortezomib Consolidation (With Thalidomide and Prednisolone) Vs Thalidomide and Prednisolone Alone in Previously Untreated Subjects With Multiple Myeloma After Receiving Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone (VCD) [NCT01539083]Phase 3256 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-13Completed
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib and Vorinostat in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed MLL Rearranged Hematologic Malignancies [NCT02419755]Phase 212 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-14Terminated(stopped due to Accrual goals were no longer feasible based on restrictions imposed by the DSMB.)
A Phase II Study Evaluating Combined Zevalin(Ibritumomab Tiuxetan)and Velcade(Bortezomib)in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma [NCT01497275]Phase 25 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual due to the approval of new drugs for use in Mantle cell lymphoma.)
A Phase I Study of MLN8237 in Combination With Bortezomib and Rituximab in Relapsed and Refractory Mantle Cell and Low Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma [NCT01695941]Phase 124 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Combination With Carboplatin in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer [NCT00416793]Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Study was terminated due to poor accrual)
Phase I/II Study of Two Different Schedules of Bortezomib (VELCADE, PS-341) and Pemetrexed (ALIMTA) in Advanced Solid Tumors, With Emphasis on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [NCT00389805]Phase 1/Phase 227 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized Study of VELCADE® (Bortezomib), Dexamethasone, and Thalidomide Versus VELCADE® (Bortezomib), Dexamethasone, Thalidomide, and Cyclophosphamide in Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Candidates for Autologous Tr [NCT00531453]Phase 298 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Completed
GEM21menos65. A Phase III Trial for NDMM Patients Who Are Candidates for ASCT Comparing Extended VRD Plus Early Rescue Intervention vs Isatuximab-VRD vs Isatuximab-V-Iberdomide-D [NCT05558319]Phase 3480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase I/II Clinical Study of JNJ-26866138 (Bortezomib) in Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Are Not Candidates for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) [NCT00985959]Phase 1101 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Completed
A Pilot Study of Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization With the Combination of Bortezomib and G-CSF in Multiple Myeloma and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients [NCT02037256]23 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-31Completed
A Phase II Study of Elotuzumab in Combination With Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02718833]Phase 252 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Active, not recruiting
Selinexor(ATG-010) Plus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (XVRd) in High Risk Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT05422027]Phase 1/Phase 242 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-07-25Recruiting
A Phase 1 Study of Tabalumab (LY2127399) in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Japanese Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT01556438]Phase 116 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
Effective Quadruplet Utilization After Treatment Evaluation (EQUATE): A Randomized Phase 3 Trial for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Intended for Early Autologous Transplantation [NCT04566328]Phase 31,450 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-24Recruiting
A Multisite, Phase II Study of Bortezomib, Isatuximab, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (VICD) Induction in Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT04240054]Phase 241 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-11-02Recruiting
Phase II Trial of Avastin Plus Bortezomib for Patients With Recurrent Malignant Glioma [NCT00611325]Phase 256 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Phase II, Trial of Chloroquine in Combination With VELCADE and Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma [NCT01438177]Phase 211 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-10-31Terminated(stopped due to PI left institution.)
Randomized Phase II Trial of Sequential Versus Concurrent Docetaxel and PS-341 (NSC 681239) in Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) [NCT00362882]Phase 281 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Completed
Comparison of Bortezomib-Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone Chemotherapy With or Without Doxycycline in Newly Diagnosed Mayo Stage II-III Light Chain Amyloidosis Patients: A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT03401372]140 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-21Completed
Bortezomib Combined With Fludarabine and Cytarabine for Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients:a Single Arm, Open-labelled, Phase 2 Study [NCT03016988]Phase 250 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Not yet recruiting
Slow-Go Strategy for High Risk AL Amyloidosis: Isatuximab for Upfront Therapy [NCT04754945]Phase 125 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-04-28Recruiting
Total Therapy for Infants With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) I [NCT02553460]Phase 1/Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-01-29Active, not recruiting
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial of Selinexor (KPT-330), Bortezomib and Low-dose Dexamethasone Plus Daratumumab (SELIBORDARA) for the Treatment of Patients With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT03589222]Phase 262 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2018-07-15Recruiting
A Randomized, Open-label Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone in Transplant-ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01818752]Phase 3955 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-08Completed
A Post Approval Commitment Study for Pharmacokinetic Analysis and Providing Expanded Access to Bortezomib (Velcade) for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received at Least Two Previous Lines of Therapy and Are Refractory to or Have Relapsed After Th [NCT01801436]Phase 314 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-12-31Completed
Tandem Autotransplantation for Multiple Myeloma in Participants With Less Than 12 Months of Preceding Therapy, Incorporating Velcade (Bortezomib) With the Transplant Chemotherapy and During Maintenance [NCT01548573]Phase 219 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Met study stopping rules)
Phase II Study of Bortezomib (PS-341) for Patients With Advanced Bronchiolo-Alveolar Carcinoma (BAC) or Adenocarcinoma With BAC Features [NCT00118144]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-06-30Completed
An Exploratory Clinical Study on Bortezomib for the Treatment of Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis [NCT05805891]20 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-31Recruiting
Chinese Children Cancer Group Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 2017 Study [NCT04224571]Phase 2208 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-09-14Completed
An Open-Label Phase I/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Combination Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00378105]Phase 1/Phase 268 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Active, not recruiting
VELCADE (Bortezomib) and Thalidomide in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00287872]Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Phase II, Open Label Study Evaluating an Alternative Schedule of Velcade/Dexamethasone Plus Doxil in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma [NCT00366106]Phase 232 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Study was closed to enrollment when it became clear that enrollment was too slow to complete full enrollment target within time frame allowed.)
Phase I/II Trial of Bortezomib (Velcade) in Addition to Tacrolimus and Methotrexate to Prevent Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) After Mismatched Allogeneic Non-Myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT00369226]Phase 1/Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-08-31Completed
Phase I/II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Combination Chemotherapy With Carboplatin, Bortezomib and Bevacizumab as First Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [NCT00424840]Phase 112 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Poor accrual)
Phase I/II Trial of Combination CCI-779 (Temsirolimus) and Bortezomib (Velcade) in Relapsed and/or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00483262]Phase 1/Phase 263 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-05-31Completed
Total Therapy XVII for Newly Diagnosed Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoma [NCT03117751]Phase 2/Phase 3790 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-03-29Active, not recruiting
Single Autologous Transplant Followed by Consolidation and Maintenance for Participants ≥ 65 Years of Age Diagnosed With Multiple Myeloma or a Related Plasma Cell Malignancy [NCT01849783]Phase 241 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-04Completed
A Phase II Study of V-BEAM (Bortezomib, Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, and Melphalan) as Conditioning Regimen Prior to Second Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma [NCT01653418]Phase 210 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Terminated(stopped due to Due to the high rate of morbidity and mortality)
Evaluation of the Prevalence, Intensity and Consequences of Bortezomib-induced Neuropathic Disorders: Monocentric Observational and Cross-sectional Study. [NCT03344328]67 participants (Actual)Observational2019-01-15Completed
The Impact of Velcade(TM)on Antibody Secreting Cells in Sensitized Renal Allograft Candidates [NCT00722722]Phase 218 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
A Pilot Study of Low Dose Melphalan and Bortezomib for Treatment of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes [NCT00789256]26 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-09-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Maintenance Treatment With Sequential Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Following Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Multiple Myeloma [NCT00792142]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-16Completed
Phase I/II Trial of Autologous Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation With VELCADE Maintenance as Treatment for Intermediate- and Advanced-Stage Multiple Myeloma [NCT00084747]Phase 1/Phase 230 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-06-30Completed
A Single-center Clinical Trial of Bortezomib in Management of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) With High Anti-platelet Antibodies Level [NCT03013114]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-01-31Not yet recruiting
A Phase II Trial of Bortezomib Plus Doxorubicin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma [NCT00083226]Phase 242 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-03-31Completed
Treatment of Anti-Interferon-Gamma Autoantibody Associated Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome With Bortezomib: Pilot Study [NCT03103555]Phase 25 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-02-27Recruiting
Safety and the Anti- Tumor Effects of Escalating Doses of Adoptively Infused Ex Vivo Expanded Autologous Natural Killer (NK) Cells Against Metastatic Cancers or Hematological Malignancies Sensitized to NK-TRAIL Cytotoxicity With Bortezomib [NCT00720785]Phase 135 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-01Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib Plus CHOP Every 2 Weeks in Patients With Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas [NCT00379574]Phase 1/Phase 249 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Multi-center Phase II Trial Randomizing Novel Approaches for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention Compared to Contemporary Controls (BMT CTN #1203; Progress I) [NCT02208037]Phase 2279 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
Phase 1 Study of Daratumumab When Given in Combination With Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, Doxil, and Lenalidomide in Patients With Plasma Cell Leukemia [NCT03591744]Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-25Withdrawn(stopped due to Budgetary constraints)
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of the Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibody, Panitumumab, and the Proteosomal Inhibitor, Bortezomib, in Patients With Advanced, Refractory KRAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer [NCT01504477]Phase 1/Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Low accrual--unable to meet accrual goals)
Multi-Drug Desensitization Protocol for Heart Transplant Candidates [NCT01556347]Phase 22 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Lack of efficacy)
Phase II Trial of Bortezomib and Vorinostat in Mantle Cell and Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas [NCT00703664]Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-09Completed
Study of the Combination of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Followed by HSCT in AL [NCT01273844]21 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-03-01Completed
A Multi-Institutional Phase I/II Study of Revlimid® (Lenalidomide), Velcade® (Bortezomib), Dexamethasone, and Doxil®, (RVDD) Combination Therapy for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma [NCT00724568]Phase 1/Phase 274 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
Use of Bortezomib to Treat Refractory Autoimmune Cytopenia(s) in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT01929980]Phase 24 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
2015-09: A Phase II Randomized, Open-label Study of Anti-SLAMF7 mAb During Maintenance Therapy Versus Standard Maintenance Therapy in Gene Expression Profiling (GEP)- Defined Low Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients With High Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities [NCT03000634]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-05-31Withdrawn(stopped due to Study was not and will not be initiated due to lack of funding.)
A Randomized Phase III Trial on the Effect of Elotuzumab in VRD Induction /Consolidation and Lenalidomide Maintenance in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma [NCT02495922]Phase 3564 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-06-30Completed
A Phase II Study of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma Using a Conditioning Regimen of Fludarabine, Melphalan, and Bortezomib [NCT01453101]Phase 254 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-09Completed
Pre-Transplant Immunosuppression and Related Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Severe Hemoglobinopathies [NCT04776850]Early Phase 10 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-12-29Withdrawn(stopped due to Competing protocol opened in Adult SCT that will include pediatric patients and is now multi-center. No patients enrolled on study.)
An Open Label, Single-Arm, Phase 1b/2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Combination Treatment With Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone and Siltuximab (CNTO 328) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Requiring System [NCT01531998]Phase 1/Phase 214 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Phase III Study Comparing Conventional Dose Treatment Using a Combination of Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVD) to High-Dose Treatment With Peripheral Stem Cell Transplant in the Initial Management of Myeloma in Patients Up to [NCT01208662]Phase 3729 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-10-31Active, not recruiting
A Phase II Study of Subcutaneous Bortezomib as Maintenance Therapy for Patients With High-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission [NCT01465386]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Terminated(stopped due to Closed early due to slow enrollment)
A Randomized Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib, Rituximab, Dexamethasone and Temsirolimus in Patients With Relapsed Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia and Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell, Follicular, Marginal Zone or Small Lymphocytic Lymphomas (Phase I), and Unt [NCT01381692]Phase 1/Phase 29 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-07-20Completed
Bortezomib With Steroid Pulse Therapy for Acute Cellular Rejection in Kidney [NCT02351427]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-02-28Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 2-parallel Group, Phase 3 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Masitinib 6 mg/kg/Day in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone to Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib an [NCT01470131]Phase 3147 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-05-31Terminated(stopped due to Sponsor decision based on portfolio prioritization)
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Study of Bortezomib Combined With DAG Regimen in the Treatment of Refractory/Relapsed AML [NCT05982756]Phase 140 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-01Recruiting
Pre-Transplant Immune Suppression With Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation From Haploidentical Donors for Adults and Children With Sickle Cell Disease or ß-Thalassemia (Haplo PTCy) [NCT05736419]Phase 224 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-09Recruiting
UARK 2013-13, Total Therapy 4B - Formerly 2008-01 - A Phase III Trial for Low Risk Myeloma Ages 65 and Under: A Trial Enrolling Subjects to Standard Total Therapy 3 (S-TT3) [NCT00734877]Phase 3382 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-07-31Active, not recruiting
Phase II Study: Therapy With Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone as Post Transplant Consolidation and Maintenance for Patients With Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma Following Autologous Transplantation [NCT02353468]Phase 23 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Terminated(stopped due to Principle investigator left the institution)
A Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of DBd Combination Therapy (DOXIL/CAELYX) [Doxorubicin HCL Liposome Injection], VELCADE [Bortezomib] and Dexamethasone) for Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT00561743]Phase 250 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Obatoclax Mesylate (GX15-070MS) Administered in Combination With Bortezomib to Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) [NCT00407303]Phase 1/Phase 224 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-10-31Completed
A Multicenter Phase II Study of Subcutaneous Velcade Plus Oral Melphalan and Prdnisone or Plus Cycloposphamide and Prednisone or Plus Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT01190787]Phase 2150 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2010-07-31Active, not recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study of Tabalumab in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma [NCT01602224]Phase 2220 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-07-31Completed
A Randomized Phase III Non-inferiority Trial Assessing Lenalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Induction Therapy With Either Intravenous or Subcutaneous Isatuximab in Transplant-eligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. [NCT05804032]Phase 3514 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-04-14Recruiting
A Single Arm, Multicentre, Open Label Study of Iberdomide, Weekly Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for Transplant-ineligible, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: the BOREALIS Trial [NCT05272826]Phase 275 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2024-02-29Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Bortezomib in Combination With Melphalan and Prednisone for Patients With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma [NCT00734149]Phase 245 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Phase I Trial of Post-Transplant Bortezomib and High Dose Cyclophosphamide as Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis After Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AHSCT) [NCT01860170]Phase 1/Phase 228 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-04-30Completed
Phase II Trial of LDE225 (Sonidegib) Plus Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma With a Dose-Finding Lead-In [NCT02254551]Phase 27 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Terminated(stopped due to Safety lead-in data did not support continuation of study.)
Minimal Residual Disease Response-adapted Deferral of Transplant in Dysproteinemia - MILESTONE Trial [NCT04991103]Phase 220 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-09-22Recruiting
Perspectives of Subcutaneous Velcade at Home of Patients With Myeloma. [NCT05163405]10 participants (Actual)Observational2019-12-01Completed
A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CAEL-101 and Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment Versus Placebo and Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment in Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Treatment Naïve Patients With Mayo Stage IIIb AL Amy [NCT04504825]Phase 3124 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2021-02-02Active, not recruiting
CAEL101-203: A Phase 2, Open-label, Multicenter Dose Selection Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of CAEL-101 in Patients With AL Amyloidosis [NCT04304144]Phase 225 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-03-18Completed
Pilot Clinical Trial of Treatment With Bortezomib to Inhibit Homologous Recombination (HR) Followed by Pembrolizumab and Cisplatin in Patients With Chemotherapy-Pretreated Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer [NCT04265872]Early Phase 120 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-15Recruiting
Multicenter Open Label Phase 3 Study of Isatuximab Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone With/Without Bortezomib in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Non Frail Transplant Ineligible Multiple Myeloma Elderly Patients (≥ 65; < 80 Years). [NCT04751877]Phase 3270 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-07-17Active, not recruiting
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter, Observational Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone(VMP) for Initial Treatment in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who do Not Undergo Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation [NCT02474563]171 participants (Actual)Observational2011-05-31Completed
Phase I Study of Plitidepsin (Aplidin®) in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT02100657]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Hemostatic Effects of VELCADE®* Treatment in Multiple Myeloma Patients [NCT01720043]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-07-31Terminated(stopped due to Slow Accrual)
A Phase 2 Study Incorporating Bone Marrow Microenvironment (ME) Co-Targeting Bortezomib Into Tandem Melphalan-Based Autotransplants With DT PACE for Induction/Consolidation and Thalidomide + Dexamethasone for Maintenance [NCT00081939]Phase 2303 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-01-31Completed
A Randomized Trial Using a Modified COG ABFM Regimen Backbone to Investigate Capizzi Escalating Methotrexate Versus High Dose Methotrexate in Children With Newly Diagnosed T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LBL) [NCT05681260]Phase 3200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-02-06Recruiting
A Prospective, Observational Study, to Evaluate the Maintenance With Bortezomib Plus Daratumumab (V-Dara) After Induction With Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone Plus Daratumumab (VMP-Dara) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Non-eligible for [NCT05218603]100 participants (Anticipated)Observational2021-11-30Recruiting
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of bb2121 Versus Standard Regimens in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) (KarMMa-3) [NCT03651128]Phase 3381 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-16Active, not recruiting
An Open-Label, Phase Ib, Dose-Escalation Study of the Safety and Pharmacology of the Anti-CD40 Monoclonal Antibody SGN-40 Administered in Combination With Bortezomib (Velcade®, PS-341) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma [NCT00664898]Phase 118 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib Plus Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma [NCT01568866]Phase 3929 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-20Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00006184 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00006184 (2) [back to overview]Immune Response
NCT00023712 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00023712 (5) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT00023712 (5) [back to overview]Tumor Response Duration
NCT00023712 (5) [back to overview]Frequency and Severity of Observed Adverse Events
NCT00023712 (5) [back to overview]Objective Partial/Complete Tumor Response Based on the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria
NCT00023764 (1) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00054665 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00054665 (2) [back to overview]Clinical Response Rate
NCT00061932 (2) [back to overview]Change in Patterns of Gene Expression Pre- and Post-treatment Performed by GeneChip Analysis
NCT00061932 (2) [back to overview]True Response Rate Evaluated for the Combination of Irinotecan and PS341 by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00075881 (4) [back to overview]1-year Progression Free Survival Probability
NCT00075881 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate on Reinduction
NCT00075881 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate on Maintenance
NCT00075881 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate on Induction
NCT00081939 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 3 Years From Initiation of Study Treatment
NCT00083226 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00083226 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00083226 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate Measured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)
NCT00084747 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00084747 (2) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00085410 (8) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00085410 (8) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00085410 (8) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate
NCT00085410 (8) [back to overview]1-year Survival
NCT00085410 (8) [back to overview]6-Month Survival
NCT00085410 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00085410 (8) [back to overview]6-Month and 1-Year Survival: Patients Who Did Not Derive Clinical Benefit From Study Treatment
NCT00085410 (8) [back to overview]6-Month and 1-Year Survival for Patients Who Derived Clinical Benefit From Study Treatment
NCT00093756 (5) [back to overview]The Primary Endpoint of This Trial is the Proportion of Patients Alive at 1 Year. Phase II Patients Only.
NCT00093756 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00093756 (5) [back to overview]Frequency and Severity of Observed Toxicity, Graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
NCT00093756 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00093756 (5) [back to overview]Confirmed Tumor Response
NCT00103259 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate on Step 1
NCT00103259 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival on Step 1
NCT00103259 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival on Step 1
NCT00103259 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate on Step 2
NCT00103376 (3) [back to overview]Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response
NCT00103376 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event by CTCAE v. 2.0
NCT00103376 (3) [back to overview]Time to PSA Progression
NCT00103506 (3) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00103506 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00103506 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00104871 (3) [back to overview]Participant Tumor Response Assessed by RECIST
NCT00104871 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Assessed by RECIST
NCT00104871 (3) [back to overview]Objective Tumor Response Rate Assessed by RECIST
NCT00108069 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00108069 (3) [back to overview]Adverse Event Grades
NCT00108069 (3) [back to overview]Response, Defined as Stable Disease or Objective (Partial or Complete) Response.
NCT00111813 (5) [back to overview]Laboratory AE Summary
NCT00111813 (5) [back to overview]Clinical AE Summary
NCT00111813 (5) [back to overview]Mean Time to First AE Resulting in a Dose Modification in Either Vorinostat or Bortezomib
NCT00111813 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Modifications of Either Vorinostat or Bortezomib Due to Adverse Experiences (AEs) After Treatment With Study Drug
NCT00111813 (5) [back to overview]Mean Duration of Treatment With Vorinostat
NCT00114738 (6) [back to overview]Overall Progression Free Survival
NCT00114738 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00114738 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00114738 (6) [back to overview]Clinical Response
NCT00114738 (6) [back to overview]Count of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events
NCT00114738 (6) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00118144 (3) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate With Bortezomib Evaluated by Both RECIST Criteria and Computer-assisted Image Analysis.
NCT00118144 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00118144 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00124579 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate Complete Remission (CR), Remission (R), and Partial Remission (PR).
NCT00124579 (3) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT00124579 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity Evaluation
NCT00128921 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Marker Osteocalcin
NCT00128921 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Markers Like Phosphate.
NCT00128921 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by the Bone Marker Parathyroid Hormone
NCT00128921 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Markers Like Magnesium
NCT00128921 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Markers Like Calcium
NCT00128921 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Marker Alkaline Phosphatase
NCT00148317 (3) [back to overview]Efficacy of Drug Combination as Therapy for Myeloma (Overall Response Rate)
NCT00148317 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00148317 (3) [back to overview]Yield of CD34+ Stem Cells
NCT00151320 (1) [back to overview]ORR
NCT00153920 (6) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00153920 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response (OR) Rate
NCT00153920 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Neuropathic Pain
NCT00153920 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00153920 (6) [back to overview]Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate
NCT00153920 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Sensory Neuropathy
NCT00201877 (3) [back to overview]Assess the Toxicity of Combination Rituximab and Velcade™ in Patients With Previously Treated Mantle Cell and Follicular Lymphoma.
NCT00201877 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00201877 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival(PFS)
NCT00250926 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00250926 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00250926 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00250926 (4) [back to overview]Time to Best Response
NCT00256776 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00256776 (2) [back to overview]Median Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00262860 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate After 2 Courses of Therapy
NCT00262860 (3) [back to overview]Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 1)
NCT00262860 (3) [back to overview]Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 2)
NCT00262873 (7) [back to overview]Average Number of Erthroid Burst Forming Units in Bone Marrow
NCT00262873 (7) [back to overview]Average Number of Leukemia Forming Units in Bone Marrow
NCT00262873 (7) [back to overview]Average Percentage of Light Density Cells in Apoptosis
NCT00262873 (7) [back to overview]Interleukin 6 Levels in Serum
NCT00262873 (7) [back to overview]Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Levels in Serum
NCT00262873 (7) [back to overview]Average Number of Colony Forming Unit-granulocyte-macrophages in Bone Marrow
NCT00262873 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event
NCT00276614 (1) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate as Measured by RECIST Criteria After Every 2 Courses of Treatment for up to 6 Courses
NCT00287872 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Response to Treatment
NCT00287872 (3) [back to overview]Peripheral Motor and Sensory Neuropathy (Grade 2 and Higher)
NCT00287872 (3) [back to overview]The Time to Response
NCT00290706 (1) [back to overview]Response Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B- and T-cell NHL With Gemcitabine and Bortezomib Combination Treatment.
NCT00295932 (2) [back to overview]Toxicity of Participants Receiving Bortezomib, Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, and Prednisone for Treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
NCT00295932 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose
NCT00298766 (6) [back to overview]Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Termination
NCT00298766 (6) [back to overview]Best Confirmed Hematologic Responders
NCT00298766 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose
NCT00298766 (6) [back to overview]Subjects Grade 3/4/5 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT00298766 (6) [back to overview]Subjects With Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT00298766 (6) [back to overview]Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
NCT00307086 (1) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00310037 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Response Intensive Chemo-immunotherapy Plus Maintenance or Consolidation Bortezomib
NCT00310037 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3, 4 or 5 Adverse Event at Least Possibly Related to Treatment.
NCT00310037 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00310037 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Rate at 18 Months
NCT00312845 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00312845 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00362882 (4) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate
NCT00362882 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00362882 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00362882 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival @ 6 Months
NCT00366106 (4) [back to overview]Relative Dose Intensity of Bortezomib
NCT00366106 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00366106 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Response
NCT00366106 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Treatment-emergent Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) by Day 100.
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (Chronic GVHD).
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Successful Initial Engraftment by Day 45 Post Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Infusion and Administration of Bortezomib (Velcade), Tacrolimus and Methotrexate
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Sustained Engraftment Following Transplant.
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]The Maximally Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bortezomib (Velcade) That Can be Administered With Tacrolimus and Methotrexate After Mismatched Allogeneic Non-myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Transplantation
NCT00369226 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival.
NCT00369707 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate
NCT00369707 (8) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Experience Adverse Events With Bortezomib/Rituximab Combination Treatment
NCT00369707 (8) [back to overview]Correlation of Tumor Burden
NCT00369707 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate
NCT00369707 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Treatment Failure
NCT00369707 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate After Completion of Maintenance Therapy
NCT00369707 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate After 1 Course of Induction Therapy
NCT00369707 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response) After Three Inductions Cycles of Treatment.
NCT00372905 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Tolerability of Bortezomib Combined With Y-90-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Determined by Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities in a Cohort.
NCT00372905 (4) [back to overview]Median Progression Free Survival
NCT00372905 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00372905 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events Related to Treatment of Bortezomib Combined With Y-90-ibritumomab Tiuxetan
NCT00376961 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate in Patients Treated With Rituximab-CHOPbortezomib Induction Therapy (R-CHOP-V) Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy(VM).
NCT00376961 (4) [back to overview]2-year Progression-free Survival in Patients Treated With Rituximab-CHOP-bortezomib Induction Therapy (RCHOP-V) Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy (VM)
NCT00376961 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through Grade 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drug
NCT00376961 (4) [back to overview]2-year Overall Survival in Patients Treated With Rituximab-CHOP-bortezomib Induction Therapy (RCHOP-V) Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy (VM)
NCT00378105 (4) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate of the Drug Combination in This Patient Populations.
NCT00378105 (4) [back to overview]Estimated 18-month Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate
NCT00378105 (4) [back to overview]Estimated 18-month Overall Survival Rate
NCT00378105 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Remained in Response for More Than 18 Months
NCT00378209 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00378209 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00378209 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00378209 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00378209 (5) [back to overview]The Proportion of Patients Alive and Without Progressive Disease (PD) for ≥6 Months
NCT00379574 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events
NCT00379574 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Achieved Complete Response
NCT00381940 (5) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR)
NCT00381940 (5) [back to overview]Induction Success Rate
NCT00381940 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00381940 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Toxicity
NCT00381940 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Successful PBSC Harvest
NCT00389805 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bortezomib in Combination With Pemetrexel (Phase I)
NCT00389805 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade ≥ 3 Toxicity (Phase I)
NCT00389805 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Experiencing a Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I)
NCT00389805 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experience Adverse Events (Phase I)
NCT00389805 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Toxicity by NCI CTC v3.0 (Phase I)
NCT00401843 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00401843 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00401843 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete Response (CR Rate)
NCT00401843 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Confirmed Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Overall Response Rate)
NCT00401843 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00408928 (2) [back to overview]Response to Bortezomib (VELCADE®)
NCT00408928 (2) [back to overview]Number of Toxicities Related to Bortezomib (VELCADE®)
NCT00410423 (2) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate to 1.3mg/m^2 of Bortezomib With Mitoxantrone and Etoposide in Phase II
NCT00410423 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I
NCT00413959 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00413959 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate Using This Regimen in Patients With Low-grade B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
NCT00416793 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months
NCT00416793 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00422799 (4) [back to overview]Duration of Response in Patients With WM
NCT00422799 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression in Patients With WM
NCT00422799 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate of Bortezomib and Rituximab (VR) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM)
NCT00422799 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate of Bortezomib and Rituximab (VR) in Patients With Previously Untreated Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM)
NCT00424840 (1) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Require Dose Delay/Reduction in Dose of Bortezomibin the First Cycle
NCT00425503 (1) [back to overview]The Purpose of the Present Study is to Assess the Safety of PS-341 as a Pretreatment in Patients Who Are to Undergo a Radical Prostatectomy. Poor Wound Healing and Excessive Bleeding, With Historical Rates of <1% and 10% Respectively Will be Measured.
NCT00425750 (3) [back to overview]Patient Response to Treatment
NCT00425750 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00425750 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00426855 (1) [back to overview]Optimal Bendamustine Dosage for Further Studies
NCT00433537 (3) [back to overview]3-year Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00433537 (3) [back to overview]2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00433537 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate
NCT00439556 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00439556 (2) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT00441168 (3) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT00441168 (3) [back to overview]Best Confirmed Disease Response
NCT00441168 (3) [back to overview]Best Reported Disease Response
NCT00458705 (1) [back to overview]Disease Response
NCT00458822 (1) [back to overview]Hematologic and Organ Response
NCT00464178 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) - Number of Participants Alive at Study Completion
NCT00464178 (2) [back to overview]Median Number of Cycles to Tumor Progression (TTP)
NCT00469209 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients Reaching Complete Response (CR)
NCT00473590 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00473590 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00473590 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response
NCT00473590 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00473590 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Overall Response
NCT00473590 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00477412 (4) [back to overview]Time to Failure (Phase II)
NCT00477412 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00477412 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response Rate
NCT00477412 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bortezomib (Phase I)
NCT00483262 (3) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT00483262 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity. Number of Patients With Specific Toxicities Are Reported.
NCT00483262 (3) [back to overview]Best Response to Combination Treatment
NCT00492050 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate After 2 Cycles of Treatment With Bortezomib and Rituximab
NCT00492050 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate After 3 Cycles of Treatment With Bortezomib and Rituximab
NCT00492050 (3) [back to overview]Participants Ability to Collect Stem Cells After Treatment With Bortezomib and Rituximab
NCT00504751 (1) [back to overview]Complete Response
NCT00507416 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response
NCT00507416 (8) [back to overview]Time to Alternative Therapy
NCT00507416 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response
NCT00507416 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00507416 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00507416 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00507416 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Very Good Partial Response
NCT00507416 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 - Global Health Status
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Stringent Complete Response Rate
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Overall Response
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Combined Complete Response and Very Good Partial Response
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Complete Response Rate + Near Complete Response Rate
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00507442 (11) [back to overview]Probability of 1-year Survival
NCT00510887 (6) [back to overview]Complete and Partial Response
NCT00510887 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00510887 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Neuropathy, Any Grade
NCT00510887 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Grade 3-4 Hematologic Toxicity.
NCT00510887 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Overall Survival
NCT00510887 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Progression Free Survival
NCT00512798 (5) [back to overview]Patients With Inhibition in NF-kB Activation (Phase I)
NCT00512798 (5) [back to overview]Patients With Inhibition of NF-kB (Phase II)
NCT00512798 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Clinical Anti-tumor Activity Phase II)
NCT00512798 (5) [back to overview]Optimal Doses of Temozolomide and Bortezomib (Phase I)
NCT00512798 (5) [back to overview]Patients With Clinical Anti-tumor Activity (Phase I)
NCT00520767 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00520767 (3) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
NCT00520767 (3) [back to overview]Complete Hematologic Response
NCT00522392 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00522392 (4) [back to overview]Response Rates (Complete Response [CR] or Very Good Partial Response [VGPR])
NCT00522392 (4) [back to overview]Change in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 6 Months Post Consolidation as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neurotoxicity Trial Outcome Index (FACT-Ntx TOI)
NCT00522392 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00523848 (3) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00523848 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (Complete and Partial)
NCT00523848 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT00531453 (2) [back to overview]Percent of Participants Achieving Overall Combined Complete Response (CR) Following High-dose Chemotherapy (HDT)/Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT)
NCT00531453 (2) [back to overview]Percent of Particpants Achieving Overall Combined Complete Response (CR) Following Induction
NCT00536575 (1) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR), the Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment
NCT00547534 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity of Drug Combination in the Subjects
NCT00547534 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00547534 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 2 Years
NCT00548717 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00548717 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of 100 Day Mortality
NCT00548717 (7) [back to overview]To Determine the Rate of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD When Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil or Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Bortezomib is Used for GVHD Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
NCT00548717 (7) [back to overview]The Rate of Renal Insufficiency
NCT00548717 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Chronic GVHD
NCT00548717 (7) [back to overview]Donor Stem Cell Engraftment, Including Donor-host Hematopoietic Chimerism Studies Post Transplant
NCT00548717 (7) [back to overview]To Correlate the Serum Concentrations of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Its Metabolites With Acute GVHD Incidence
NCT00553644 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Overall Response Defined as Complete Response and Partial Response
NCT00553644 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00553644 (4) [back to overview]Incidence of Adverse Events
NCT00553644 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) of PD-0332991: Phase 1
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS): Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR): Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS): Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of PD-0332991: Phase 1
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Duration of Objective Response (DR): Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20): Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Modified Version of Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-sf) Questionnaire: Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity: Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Relationship to Study Medication: Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Phase 2
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Best Overall Response: Phase 1
NCT00555906 (14) [back to overview]Time to Tumor Progression (TTP): Phase 2
NCT00560352 (6) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended MTD of Dasatinib in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone
NCT00560352 (6) [back to overview]MTD and Recommended MTD of Bortezomib in Combination With Dasatinib and Dexamethasone
NCT00560352 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00560352 (6) [back to overview]Best Overall Tumor Response Rate (RR) As Assessed Using International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma and Criteria of the European Bone Marrow Transplant Registry
NCT00560352 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00560352 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Death As Outcome, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug-related SAEs, Drug-related Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation, AEs Leading to Discontinuation, AEs, and Drug-related AEs by Grade
NCT00571493 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00571493 (3) [back to overview]Preliminary Estimate of Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00571493 (3) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bortezomib
NCT00581360 (5) [back to overview]Median Duration of Stable Disease Response
NCT00581360 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00581360 (5) [back to overview]Stable Disease Rate
NCT00581360 (5) [back to overview]Number of Months of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00581360 (5) [back to overview]Number of Months of Survival
NCT00581776 (4) [back to overview]3 Year Progression Free Survival
NCT00581776 (4) [back to overview]3 Year Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00581776 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Completion of Induction Chemotherapy, Which is the Percent of Complete Responses (CR) Plus Percent of Partial Responses (PR).
NCT00581776 (4) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate (CR) at the End of Induction Chemotherapy
NCT00608907 (1) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-72 Hours
NCT00609167 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00609167 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Achieved a Confirmed Responses Defined as a Complete Response (CR), Near CR or Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After the First 4 Months of Treatment
NCT00609167 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Responded to Treatment (Complete Response,CR; Near Complete Response, nCR; Very Good Partial Response, VGPR; or Partial Response, PR) After 4 Cycles
NCT00609167 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Responded to Treatment (CR, nCR, VGPR or PR) After 8 Cycles
NCT00609167 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Severe Adverse Events
NCT00609167 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00609167 (8) [back to overview]Participants Who Successfully Completed Collection of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Transplant
NCT00609167 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00611325 (5) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00611325 (5) [back to overview]Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00611325 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade 3 or Greater, Treatment-related, Non-hematologic Toxicities
NCT00611325 (5) [back to overview]Radiographic Response Rate
NCT00611325 (5) [back to overview]6-month Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Time to Best Response of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Time to Best Response of Phase I and Phase II Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) of Phase I and Phase II Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival of Phase I and Phase II Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Incidence of Non-Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability, Phase II
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR) of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Lenalidomide Combined With Bortezomib and Rituximab in Phase I Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR) of Phase I and Phase II Participants
NCT00633594 (12) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Phase I and Phase II Participants
NCT00634179 (2) [back to overview]Maximal Tolerated Doses of Bortezomib and Vincristine When Used in Combination of Bortezomib, Rituximab and the CHOP Chemotherapy Regimen (Phase I)
NCT00634179 (2) [back to overview]An Estimate of the Overall Response Rate (ORR)(Complete Response [CR] + CR Unconfirmed [CRu] + Partial Response [PR]) to Bortezomib and Rituximab (VR)-CHOP According to International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria (IWRC) Criteria
NCT00636792 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Response
NCT00636792 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response (Complete and Partial Response)
NCT00641706 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Confirmed Tumor Response Defined as an Objective Status of Confirmed Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Regression (REGR) on Two Consecutive Evaluations
NCT00641706 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00641706 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 6 Months
NCT00641706 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00644228 (3) [back to overview]Response Rates ()
NCT00644228 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00644228 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00666588 (5) [back to overview]Dose Limiting Toxicity
NCT00666588 (5) [back to overview]NF-kB Activity by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
NCT00666588 (5) [back to overview]Feasibility of Stem Cell Quantitation: Percentage of Leukemia Initiation Cells (LIC) Depletion
NCT00666588 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response (Complete Remission [CR] and CR With Partial Recovery [CRp]) During Course 1
NCT00666588 (5) [back to overview]Proteasome Inhibition Activity
NCT00691704 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00691704 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00691704 (5) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT00691704 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00691704 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00703664 (5) [back to overview]Best Response
NCT00703664 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00703664 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00703664 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Stable Disease
NCT00703664 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Partial Response
NCT00711828 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00711828 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00711828 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT00711828 (6) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00711828 (6) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT00711828 (6) [back to overview]Proportion of Responses (Complete Response or Partial Response)
NCT00715208 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced at Least One Serious Adverse Event
NCT00715208 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 1 Year
NCT00715208 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Complete Response (CR)
NCT00715208 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00715208 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR)
NCT00719901 (2) [back to overview]Number of Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) Incidents (Phase I)
NCT00719901 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Have at Least a Partial Response (Phase I)
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Time to Next Anti-lymphoma Treatment (TTNT)
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Treatment-free Interval (TFI)
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Overall Complete Response (CR + CRu)
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) in Long Term Follow-up Period
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00722137 (11) [back to overview]18-Month Survival
NCT00722566 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Overall Response (Complete Response + Partial Response)
NCT00722566 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Complete Response
NCT00722722 (1) [back to overview]Response to Bortezomib Monotherapy
NCT00724568 (2) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients That Achieved Partial or Complete Response to Treatment.
NCT00724568 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Combination Therapy With VELCADE, Dexamethasone, and Doxil, (RVDD)
NCT00734149 (3) [back to overview]Response
NCT00734149 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Any Grade or Severe Adverse Event
NCT00734149 (3) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response
NCT00742625 (4) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival
NCT00742625 (4) [back to overview]Participants Experiencing a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) of Bortezomib When Administered in Combination With Intermediate-dose Cytarabine
NCT00742625 (4) [back to overview]Remission Induction Response
NCT00742625 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00750815 (4) [back to overview]Phase II: Two Year Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00750815 (4) [back to overview]Phase II: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00750815 (4) [back to overview]Phase I - Maximum Planned Dose (MPD) Level
NCT00750815 (4) [back to overview]Phase II: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00765102 (7) [back to overview]Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
NCT00765102 (7) [back to overview]Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)
NCT00765102 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)
NCT00765102 (7) [back to overview]Terminal Half-life (t1/2)
NCT00765102 (7) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)
NCT00765102 (7) [back to overview]Total Clearance (CL)
NCT00765102 (7) [back to overview]Total Volume of Distribution (Vz)
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients in Each Group With Any of the Following: Rejection Reversal or Recurrent Rejection
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Mean Serum Creatinine
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Renal Allograft Survival
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Allografts With C4d Focal Positive Pretreatment Biopsy
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD)
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Incidence of Death
NCT00771875 (7) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Allografts With C4d Diffuse Positive Pretreatment Biopsy
NCT00772668 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00772668 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00772668 (3) [back to overview]Rate of Toxicity in Study Participants
NCT00773747 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00773747 (5) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT00773747 (5) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00773747 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00773747 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3-5 Clinical or Laboratory Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00773838 (8) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (RR)
NCT00773838 (8) [back to overview]TTP as Assessed by Investigator Per EBMT Criteria
NCT00773838 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
NCT00773838 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT00773838 (8) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Determined by IAC Per EBMT Criteria
NCT00773838 (8) [back to overview]PFS as Assessed by Investigator Per EBMT Criteria
NCT00773838 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00773838 (8) [back to overview]Time To Disease Progression (TTP) as Determined by IAC Per EBMT Criteria
NCT00782821 (5) [back to overview]Antibody-mediated Rejection by Banff '97 Criteria (Updated 2005)
NCT00782821 (5) [back to overview]Acute Cellular Rejection by Banff '97 Criteria (Updated 2005)
NCT00782821 (5) [back to overview]Patient Allograft Survival at 12 Months
NCT00782821 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Acute Rejection (Banff '97) or Antibody Mediated Rejection
NCT00782821 (5) [back to overview]Patient Survival at 12 Months
NCT00784823 (1) [back to overview]The Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bortezomib (MTD)
NCT00789256 (1) [back to overview]Response Rate of the Combination of Bortezomib and Melphalan in Patients With AML and High-risk MDS.
NCT00790647 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Surviving at 1 Year
NCT00790647 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Surviving at 100 Days From Transplant
NCT00790647 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematologic Response
NCT00790647 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Surviving at 2 Years
NCT00792142 (3) [back to overview]One Year Overall Survival
NCT00792142 (3) [back to overview]One Year Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT00792142 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00793572 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients Surviving Overall
NCT00793572 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients Surviving Progression-free
NCT00793572 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Chronic GVHD
NCT00793572 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Toxicities Related to Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy
NCT00793572 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Non-relapse Mortality
NCT00793572 (6) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD
NCT00793650 (2) [back to overview]Safety and Engraftment
NCT00793650 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate Using EBMT(European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplan) Criteria at Day +100 After Transplant.
NCT00798720 (4) [back to overview]Three-month Progression-free Survival
NCT00798720 (4) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT00798720 (4) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00798720 (4) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT00810576 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Response
NCT00813150 (4) [back to overview]Time to Progression of Disease
NCT00813150 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00813150 (4) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00813150 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) - International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria
NCT00815919 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Tolerating >50% Steroid Dose Reduction After a 15 Week Course of Bortezomib Plus Prednisone in Patients With cGVHD
NCT00815919 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate After a 15 Week Course of Bortezomib Plus Prednisone in Patients With cGVHD
NCT00815919 (5) [back to overview]Proportion of cGVHD Patients Requiring Prednisone by 1 Year After Therapy
NCT00815919 (5) [back to overview]Overall and cGVHD Progression-free Survival by 1 Year After Therapy
NCT00815919 (5) [back to overview]The Toxicity of a 15 Week Course of Bortezomib Plus Prednisone in Patients With cGVHD
NCT00818649 (1) [back to overview]Number of Patients by Best Clinical Response
NCT00833560 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response + Partial Response in Relation to Cytogenetic Subgroups (Per-protocol Set)
NCT00833560 (4) [back to overview]Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) (Per-protocol Analysis Set)
NCT00833560 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response + Partial Response in Relation to Cytogenetic Subgroups (Efficacy Set)
NCT00833560 (4) [back to overview]Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) (Efficacy Set)
NCT00839956 (4) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression in Patients Who Progressed
NCT00839956 (4) [back to overview]Median Follow-up Survival for All Patients
NCT00839956 (4) [back to overview]Survival for All Patients
NCT00839956 (4) [back to overview]Toxicity as Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0
NCT00849251 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of This Combination of Drugs as Assessed by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (Cohort 1) [MTD Cyclophosphamide, MTD Bortezmib, MTD Docxorubicin]
NCT00849251 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of This Combination of Drugs as Assessed by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (Cohort 1). [Dexamethasone MTD]
NCT00850499 (2) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT00850499 (2) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT00858234 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)
NCT00858234 (3) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From 0 to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC0-24hr) of Vorinostat Administered With Bortezomib on Days 1 and 11
NCT00858234 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1
NCT00863369 (3) [back to overview]Number of Subject With Complete Response
NCT00863369 (3) [back to overview]Recommended Phase II Dose
NCT00863369 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least One Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00869323 (5) [back to overview]Remission Duration Among Patients Who Respond to Treatment
NCT00869323 (5) [back to overview]Relapse-free Survival
NCT00869323 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00869323 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Overall (Complete and Partial) Response Rates
NCT00869323 (5) [back to overview]Time to Treatment Failure
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Toxic Death Rate
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 1
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 2
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 3
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Severe Adverse Events (SAE) Rate.
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Event Free Survival
NCT00873093 (7) [back to overview]Second Complete Remission Rate at the End of Block 1 Reinduction Chemotherapy
NCT00903968 (6) [back to overview]Response Rate of Plerixafor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma (ORR) [Phase I and Phase II]
NCT00903968 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP) [Phase II]
NCT00903968 (6) [back to overview]Plerixafor Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) [Phase I]
NCT00903968 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) [Phase I]
NCT00903968 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) [Phase II]
NCT00903968 (6) [back to overview]Bortezomib Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) [Phase I]
NCT00908232 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00908232 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00908232 (6) [back to overview]Overall Best Confirmed Response
NCT00908232 (6) [back to overview]One Year Survival
NCT00908232 (6) [back to overview]Median Time to First Confirmed Response
NCT00908232 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00908583 (4) [back to overview]Number of Living Donor Transplant Candidates That Are Transplanted
NCT00908583 (4) [back to overview]Overall Safety of Bortezomib
NCT00908583 (4) [back to overview]Acute Rejection Rate
NCT00908583 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients Whose Cytotoxic Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) is Decreased by 50%
NCT00911859 (9) [back to overview]1-year Survival Rate
NCT00911859 (9) [back to overview]1-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate
NCT00911859 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Stringent Complete Response (sCR) - International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria
NCT00911859 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Overall Response ie, Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) - European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Criteria
NCT00911859 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR) - European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Criteria
NCT00911859 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00911859 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT00911859 (9) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00911859 (9) [back to overview]Change From Baseline to Cycle 9 in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Change From in Baseline Biochemistry: Serum Creatinine, Total Bilirubin
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology: White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Platelets
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biochemistry -Urea, Bicarbonate
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Prothrombin Time (PT)/ International Normalized Ratio (INR)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology: Hematocrit
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology: Hemoglobin
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Hematology: Red Blood Cell (RBC)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Minor Response (MR) as Best Response (BR)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response Rate
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partial Response (PR) as Best Response (BR)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Partial Response (PR) as Last Observed Response (LOR)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) PD as Best Response (BR)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) PD as Last Observed Response (LOR)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) as Best Response (BR)
NCT00920556 (17) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) as Last Observed Response (LOR)
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression-Free Survival
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Summary of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Participants' Best Tumor Response as Assessed by the Investigator
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Time to the First Response
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With An Overall Tumor Response As Assessed By the Investigator
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00920855 (9) [back to overview]Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Overall Survival (OS)
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Terminal Half-Life (T1/2) of Bortezomib
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Daily Oral Bortezomib
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Daily Oral Vandetanib
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Area Under the Bortezomib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity/Dose (AUCinf/D)
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Bortezomib Volume of Distribution (Vss)
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Comparison of Steady State Vandetanib Exposure With Relevant Literature Values
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Maximum Bortezomib Plasma Concentration Normalized to Dose (Cmax/D)
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Response Rate (Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) of Adults With a Diagnosis of MTC Treated With Either of Two Regimens: (1) Daily Oral Vandetanib and Bortezomib or (2) Daily Oral Vandetanib
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Phase 2: Progression Free Survival in Adults With a Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Cancer (MTC) Treated With Daily Oral Vandetanib and Bortezomib
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Bortezomib
NCT00923247 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Patients With Non-germinal Center B-cell-like (Non-GCB) Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival Rate
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Negative Rate
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory Values Grade 3 or Higher
NCT00931918 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Category
NCT00937495 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00937495 (3) [back to overview]Confirmed Tumor Responses
NCT00937495 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT00948922 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Rate
NCT00948922 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT00948922 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute or Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Following Transplant
NCT00958256 (1) [back to overview]Response Rate
NCT00967369 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response After 3 Cycles of Botezomib Plus ICE (BICE) Versus Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (ICE) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
NCT00967369 (4) [back to overview]PET Scan Response After 3 Cycles of BICE Versus ICE Chemotherapy.
NCT00967369 (4) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months
NCT00967369 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 24 Months
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Skeletal Survey for New Osteolytic Lesions/Fractures
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Bone Remodelling
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Bone Pain
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Bone Remodelling
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Bone Pain
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Skeletal Survey for New Osteolytic Lesions/Fractures
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]New Skeletal-related Events (SRE: Pathologic Fractures, Need for Bone Radiation Therapy or Surgery)
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]New Skeletal-related Events (SRE: Pathologic Fractures, Need for Bone Radiation Therapy or Surgery)
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Bone Remodelling
NCT00972959 (12) [back to overview]Bone Remodelling
NCT00980395 (4) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT00980395 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival at 2 Years
NCT00980395 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 2 Years
NCT00980395 (4) [back to overview]Partial Response
NCT00983346 (1) [back to overview]Bone Anabolic Effect of Bortezomib in Patients With Smoldering Myeloma.
NCT00985907 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Phase 1)
NCT00985959 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bortezomib (JNJ-26866138 Alone) - Phase I
NCT00985959 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bortezomib (JNJ-26866138 in Combination With Melphalan and Prednisolone) - Phase I
NCT00985959 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Melphalan - Phase I
NCT00985959 (7) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Prednisolone - Phase I
NCT00985959 (7) [back to overview]Median Time to First Response - Phase II
NCT00985959 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity During the Phase I (Cycle 1)
NCT00985959 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) - Phase I and II
NCT00990652 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (in Days)
NCT00990652 (5) [back to overview]Number of Grade 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Adverse Events Observed During Study Treatment (Defined by CTCAE v 3.0)
NCT00990652 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months
NCT00990652 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Surviving Without Disease Progression After 6 Months
NCT00990652 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants Achieving a Response to Treatment (Either Complete or Partial Response) as Defined by MacDonald Criteria
NCT00992446 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00992446 (4) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT00992446 (4) [back to overview]Toxicity of Vorinostat Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy After Autologous Transplant
NCT00992446 (4) [back to overview]Median Time to Disease Progression
NCT00998010 (5) [back to overview]Survival at 1 Year
NCT00998010 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT00998010 (5) [back to overview]Toxicity Assessed According to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.
NCT00998010 (5) [back to overview]Tumor Progression as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Neurologic Exam
NCT00998010 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT01000285 (8) [back to overview]Efficacy of Treatment as Measured by Best Overall Response
NCT01000285 (8) [back to overview]Effects of on HTLV-1 DNA After Treatment as Measured by Proviral Loads
NCT01000285 (8) [back to overview]Effects of HTLV-1 RNA Load After Treatment as Measured by Hbz Messenger RNA
NCT01000285 (8) [back to overview]Effects of HTLV-1 Integration Sites After Treatment
NCT01000285 (8) [back to overview]Effects of HTLV-1 Integrase Gene Sequence After Treatment as Measured by Nucleotide Divergence
NCT01000285 (8) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT01000285 (8) [back to overview]Tolerability of Treatment as Measured by Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
NCT01000285 (8) [back to overview]Relation of NFκB Gene Expression Profile on Response
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Percent Difference Between Area Under Curve (AUC) and Target AUC
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Percent Change in IV Busulfan Dose
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease Based on Baltimore Criteria
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Disease Response at Month 6
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Ratio Area Under Curve (AUC)/Target AUC
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Transplant-Related Mortality
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival Events
NCT01009840 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival Events
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System : FACT/GOG-NTX-Change From Baseline by Treatment Group
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC) QLQ-MY20-Change From Baseline by Treatment Group
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]Time to Response Per Investigator Assessment (mEBMT Criteria) of Response Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC ) QLQ-C30 - Summary Statistics by Treatment Group
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]Duration of Response Per Investigator Assessment (mEBMT Criteria) Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]Overall Survival in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]Time to Progression/Relapse Per Investigator Assessment (mEBMT Criteria) Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.
NCT01023308 (11) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Events in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.
NCT01029730 (4) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival
NCT01029730 (4) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01029730 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety.
NCT01029730 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01034553 (4) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate to the Combination of MLN8237 and Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
NCT01034553 (4) [back to overview]Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) (Phase I)
NCT01034553 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01034553 (4) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01040871 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Durable Complete Response
NCT01040871 (7) [back to overview]Rate of Durable Response
NCT01040871 (7) [back to overview]Subsequent Anti-lymphoma Therapy Rate at 1-year
NCT01040871 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate at 1-year
NCT01040871 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01040871 (7) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate
NCT01040871 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)Rate at 1-year
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Experienced Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01056276 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01056601 (3) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival
NCT01056601 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants by Tumor Response
NCT01056601 (3) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01058239 (6) [back to overview]Treatment Related Toxicities
NCT01058239 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01058239 (6) [back to overview]Effects of Bortezomib/Rituximab on EBV Quantitative Viral Load
NCT01058239 (6) [back to overview]Six-Month Progression Free Survival
NCT01058239 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01058239 (6) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01062230 (1) [back to overview]Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone Levels on Day 1
NCT01063907 (5) [back to overview]To Establish the Safety, Tolerability, and RP2D (Phase 1); To Assess the Overall Response Rate in Subjects With Advanced Multiple Myeloma (Phase 2).
NCT01063907 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1: PK Exposure Cmax ng/mL Day 11
NCT01063907 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1: PK Elimination t½ hr Day 11
NCT01063907 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1: PK Absorption Tmax hr Day 11
NCT01063907 (5) [back to overview]Phase 1: PK Exposure AUC0-t hr*ng/mL Day 11
NCT01072773 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Confirmed Hematologic Response
NCT01072773 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events.
NCT01072773 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01072773 (5) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression
NCT01072773 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an Organ Response.
NCT01078441 (1) [back to overview]One-year Survival in Patients Treated With This Regimen.
NCT01078454 (1) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Hematologic Overall Response (Partial Response [PR]+ Very Good PR [VGPR]+ Amyloid Complete Response [ACR]+ Stringent Complete Response [sCR]) After 3 Months (3 Cycles) of Therapy
NCT01083316 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Surviving at 5 Years
NCT01083316 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Proceeding to Transplant Following Induction
NCT01083316 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants Surviving at 100 Days Post Transplant
NCT01083316 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Disease Response
NCT01083602 (6) [back to overview]Over All Survival
NCT01083602 (6) [back to overview]Responders to Treatment
NCT01083602 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01083602 (6) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT01083602 (6) [back to overview]Time to Response (Greater Than or Equal to PR) Based on Investigator Assessment
NCT01083602 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (PR+nCR+CR)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Everolimus
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Bendamustine
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 7)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 6)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Toxicity of Administration of IDELA
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 1, Cohorts 2 and 3, Cohort 5)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 4)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Sub-study: Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohorts 1-4)
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Plasma Concentration of Lenalidomide
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01088048 (15) [back to overview]Duration of Exposure to IDELA
NCT01090921 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Dose Reductions in Bortezomib, Dexamethasone or Both
NCT01100242 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01100242 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01100242 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity Profile
NCT01103778 (4) [back to overview]Proteinuria
NCT01103778 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Complete Remission, Partial Response, or no Response.
NCT01103778 (4) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Abnormal Lab Values or Infections Related to Exposure to Study Medication.
NCT01103778 (4) [back to overview]Serum Creatinine
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]FACT-G Total Score
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]FACT-BMT Trial Outcome Index
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]FACT-BMT Score
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]MOS SF-36 Mental Component Summary
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Treatment Response
NCT01109004 (10) [back to overview]MOS SF-36 Physical Component Summary
NCT01119794 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) of the Combination of Ofatumumab and Bortezomib in Patients Receiving Study Treatment
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]PTEN Mutation Rate [Phase II]
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]Phase II Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]Phase II Overall Response Rate
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]Treatment-Emergent Sensory Neuropathy Rate [Phase I]
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]Very-good-partial-response-or-better Rate [Phase II]
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]Everolimus Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) [Phase I]
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]Everolimus Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Stage B [Phase I]
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]Everolimus Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Stage A [Phase I]
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]2 Year Progression-free-survival [Phase II]
NCT01125293 (10) [back to overview]2-year Time-to-progression Probability (TTP) [Phase II]
NCT01142401 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months
NCT01142401 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival at 24 Weeks (Arm C)
NCT01142401 (6) [back to overview]Frequency of Most Common Toxicities
NCT01142401 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Survived Until Study End (up to 7 Years)
NCT01142401 (6) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) of Adding Bortezomib to Fulvestrant in Arm C
NCT01142401 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 12 Months
NCT01146834 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Able to Collect >=6 x 106 CD34+ Cells/kg in <= 2 Collections.
NCT01146834 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Achieved Neutrophil Recovery After Melphalan 200 Based Transplant
NCT01146834 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients Who Achieved Platelet Recovery After Melphalan 200 Based Transplant
NCT01160484 (7) [back to overview]Follow-up Time
NCT01160484 (7) [back to overview]Time to Best Response
NCT01160484 (7) [back to overview]International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria
NCT01160484 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT01160484 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01160484 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01160484 (7) [back to overview]Time to First Response
NCT01163786 (3) [back to overview]Exercise Tolerance- 6 Minute Walk
NCT01163786 (3) [back to overview]Change in Pulmonary Function as Measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Decline
NCT01163786 (3) [back to overview]Short Form (SF)-36 Health Survey
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase I: MTD of Bendamustine When Combined With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase I & Phase II : Toxicity of Treatment Regimen
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase II: Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase II: Overall Survival
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase II: Duration of Survival
NCT01177683 (6) [back to overview]Phase II : Time to Progression
NCT01186458 (1) [back to overview]Toxicity
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Subsequent Therapy Rate
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Median Treatment Duration
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Median Maintenance Treatment Duration
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Median Event Free Survival (EFS)
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Sub-scale
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Change From Baseline on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX)
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Partial Response (PR) Rate
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response: Partial Response (DOR PR)
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Related Non-Hematologic Adverse Event (AE) Rate
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) Rate
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]5-Year Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]5-Year Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]5-year Cumulative Incidence of Second Primary Malignancy (SPM)
NCT01208662 (17) [back to overview]Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Minimal Residual Disease Negative (MRD-) Rate at Maintenance Start
NCT01212952 (3) [back to overview]Find Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bortezomib in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Out to 2.5 Years, by Count of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities.
NCT01212952 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01212952 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01215344 (2) [back to overview]The Percent of Patients With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status Changing to Negative at Day 100 (Post-AHCT), Among Patients With MRD Positive at the End of Induction (EOI).
NCT01215344 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival by MRD Status at Day 100.
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Baseline
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Complete Remission (CR) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]5-year Overall Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]3-year Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]3-year Progression-free Survival Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]1-year Post-induction Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Baseline
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at the End of Induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Baseline
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Baseline
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Mid-treatment
NCT01216683 (25) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at End of Induction Treatment
NCT01242267 (4) [back to overview]Toxicity Assessment
NCT01242267 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of Thalidomide
NCT01242267 (4) [back to overview]Treatment Free Interval/PFS
NCT01242267 (4) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VgPR) Rate
NCT01267812 (3) [back to overview]Two-year Overall Survival
NCT01267812 (3) [back to overview]Grade 3 or 4 Toxicities of Bortezomib and Rituximab Treatment
NCT01267812 (3) [back to overview]Two-year Disease-free Survival
NCT01281917 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01281917 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01281917 (5) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01281917 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01281917 (5) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Tumor Response: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Stringent Complete Response (sCR) or Complete Response (CR) Based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Tumor Response: Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Progressive Disease (PD) Based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Skeletal Events
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in the Femur at End of Treatment
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biochemical Bone Markers: Dickkopf Homolog 1 (DKK-1)
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in the Spine at End of Treatment (EOT)
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biochemical Bone Markers: Carboxyterminal Collagen Crosslinks (CTX-I)
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Appearance of New Bone Lesions Compared to Baseline
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Assessed by Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Spine T-score
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Karnofsky Performance Status
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Tumor Response: Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR) Based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Biochemical Bone Markers:Carboxyterminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (ICTP), Osteocalcin, Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP)
NCT01286077 (15) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01286272 (3) [back to overview]The Number of Patients Who Experienced Grade 3+ Hematologic and Non-hematologic Adverse Events at Least Possibly Related to Treatment
NCT01286272 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01286272 (3) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01312818 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Who Achieved Complete Remission of Their Disease
NCT01312818 (2) [back to overview]Number of Subjects Experiencing Drug Related Adverse Events
NCT01313897 (1) [back to overview]Therapeutic Efficacy
NCT01323920 (4) [back to overview]The Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD Requiring Systemic Immune Suppression up to 1 Year After Stem Cell Infusion
NCT01323920 (4) [back to overview]The Non-relapse Mortality, Progression-free and Overall Survival up to 1 Year After Stem Cell Infusion
NCT01323920 (4) [back to overview]The Percentage Donor Engraftment up to Day 30 Post Stem Cell Infusion
NCT01323920 (4) [back to overview]The Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD up to Day 100 After Stem Cell Infusion
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of High Risk Children Without HR FLT3/ITD+ Converting From Positive MRD at End of Induction I to Negative MRD at the End of Induction II
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]EFS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 3
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]OS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 1
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients Without High Allelic Ratio FLT3/ITD+ Mutations
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]OS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 3
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Relapse Rate for Patients Without High Allelic Ratio FLT3/ITD+ Mutations
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Change in Ejection Fraction
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) for Patients Without High Allelic Ratio FLT3/ITD+ Mutations
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]OS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 2
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Bortezomib Clearance
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Change in Shortening Fraction
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Sorafenib Steady State Concentration
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Total Scale Score From Parent-reported Cancer Module
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Total Scale Score From Parent-reported Multidimensional Fatigue Scale Module
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Total Scale Score From Parent-reported Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Module
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]EFS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 1
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]EFS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 2
NCT01371981 (18) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Non-hematologic Toxicities and Infections While on Protocol Therapy
NCT01381692 (1) [back to overview]Phase I: The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Temsirolimus in Combination With Bortezomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone
NCT01383759 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival at 24 Months
NCT01383759 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Experiencing Progression Free Survival at 12 Months
NCT01383759 (3) [back to overview]Participants Evaluated for Toxicity
NCT01397591 (2) [back to overview]Response Rate of Ofatumumab in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed CD20+ (Cluster of DIfferentiation Antigen 20) Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma
NCT01397591 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Toxicity)
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Adverse Events
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Complete Remission Rate (CR and CRi)
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NCT01420926 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) Time
NCT01438177 (3) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response of This Regimen
NCT01438177 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Grade 3 or Higher
NCT01438177 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate (CR + PR After 2 Cycles)
NCT01453088 (2) [back to overview]Overall Survival Rate
NCT01453088 (2) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival Rate
NCT01453101 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01453101 (3) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01453101 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01462773 (2) [back to overview]Determine Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) of VELCADE When Administered in Combination With IFN-α-2b to Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma.
NCT01462773 (2) [back to overview]Document Any Objective Anti-tumor Responses and Time to Tumor Progression That May Occur in Response to This Treatment Regimen.
NCT01465386 (1) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01478048 (6) [back to overview]1 Year Progression-Free Survival Rate - Randomized Participants
NCT01478048 (6) [back to overview]Investigator-Assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR) - All Randomized Participants
NCT01478048 (6) [back to overview]Investigator-Assessed Objective Response Rate in Randomized Participants With at Least One FcγRIIIa V Allele
NCT01478048 (6) [back to overview]Median Investigator-Assessed Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time (Months) From Randomization to Date of First Tumor Progression or Death Due to Any Cause - Randomized Participants
NCT01478048 (6) [back to overview]Number of Investigator-Assessed Progression-free Survival Events From Randomization to Date of First Tumor Progression or Death Due to Any Cause - All Randomized Participants
NCT01478048 (6) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival Time (Months) From Randomization to Date of First Tumor Progression or Death Due to Any Cause, in Randomized Participants With at Least One FcγRIIIa V Allele
NCT01497275 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival
NCT01497275 (3) [back to overview]Response Rate (Complete Response + Partial Response)
NCT01497275 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival at 1 Year
NCT01504477 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose
NCT01504477 (5) [back to overview]Percent of Patients With Disease Control
NCT01504477 (5) [back to overview]Percent of of Patients With a Complete or Partial Response
NCT01504477 (5) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose
NCT01504477 (5) [back to overview]Duration of Disease Control
NCT01531998 (2) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Siltuximab
NCT01531998 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response
NCT01534260 (4) [back to overview]Phase II - Percentage of Patients With a Partial Response or Greater
NCT01534260 (4) [back to overview]Phase II - Time to Relapse
NCT01534260 (4) [back to overview]Phase II - Treatment-Related Adverse Events Grade 3 or Higher
NCT01534260 (4) [back to overview]Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicity
NCT01536067 (1) [back to overview]Frequency and Severity of Toxicity as Graded According to the Cancer Therapeutic Evaluation Program (CTEP) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 4.0
NCT01539083 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01539083 (8) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01539083 (8) [back to overview]Consolidation Phase: Change From Baseline in AQOL-6D Scores at the End of the Consolidation Phase
NCT01539083 (8) [back to overview]Consolidation Phase: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
NCT01539083 (8) [back to overview]Consolidation Phase: Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR) at Months 3, 6, 9 and 12
NCT01539083 (8) [back to overview]Disease-free Survival (DFS)
NCT01539083 (8) [back to overview]Consolidation Phase: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) at Month 12
NCT01539083 (8) [back to overview]Consolidation Phase: Change From Baseline in FACT/GOG-NTX Total Score at the End of the Consolidation Phase
NCT01548573 (4) [back to overview]Number of Grade 3 Non-hematologic and Grade 4 Hematologic Serious Adverse Events Associated With the Addition of Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone Into Autologous Transplant Regimens.
NCT01548573 (4) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01548573 (4) [back to overview]Event-Free Survival (EFS)
NCT01548573 (4) [back to overview]Identification of Drug Resistant Genes
NCT01556347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Suffer Mortality, a Serious Adverse Event, or Other Adverse Event During the Study Period
NCT01556347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Experience CMV, PTLD, and PML
NCT01556347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Transplanted
NCT01556347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients Who Experience Grade 3 and Above Non-Hematologic Toxicities
NCT01556347 (9) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Who Experience Either a Respiratory Tract Infection or a Urinary Tract Infection
NCT01556347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With Grade 4 Hematologic Toxicities
NCT01556347 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With a Reduction in CPRA to Less Than 20%
NCT01556347 (9) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Who Experience Exacerbations Cardiac Dysrhythmias or Heart Failure
NCT01556347 (9) [back to overview]The Percentage of Patients Who Experience Any Grade of Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT01556438 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacodynamics (PD): Change From Baseline in B-cell Subset Fractions
NCT01556438 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-∞) of Tabalumab (LY2127399)
NCT01556438 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Tabalumab (LY2127399)
NCT01556438 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With One or More Drug Related Adverse Events (AEs) or Any Serious AEs
NCT01556438 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT01556438 (8) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01556438 (8) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Tumor Response (Tumor Response Rate)
NCT01556438 (8) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Plasma Concentration (AUC0-tlast) of Tabalumab (LY2127399)
NCT01568866 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Significant Reduction in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
NCT01568866 (8) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01568866 (8) [back to overview]Overall Response
NCT01568866 (8) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT01568866 (8) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01568866 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)
NCT01568866 (8) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Right Ventricular Fractional Area Change (FAC)
NCT01568866 (8) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With >30% Reduction in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Worst Pain Score
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Time to Next Treatment (TNT)
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Given Best Objective Myeloma Response (Quality of Response [QoR])
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Time to First Skeletal-Related Event (SRE)
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]PK: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Tabalumab
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Tabalumab
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]PK: Area Under the Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC-T) for Tabalumab
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) in Each Category
NCT01602224 (13) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DoR)
NCT01605032 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01605032 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01605032 (5) [back to overview]Rate of Complete Response as Determined by the IMWG Criteria
NCT01605032 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01605032 (5) [back to overview]Mortality
NCT01653418 (9) [back to overview]Toxicity of V-BEAM
NCT01653418 (9) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate (Complete Response + Stringent Complete Response)
NCT01653418 (9) [back to overview]Very Good Partial Response Rate (VGPR+nCR+sCR+CR)
NCT01653418 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01653418 (9) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01653418 (9) [back to overview]Time to Platelet Engraftment After V-BEAM.
NCT01653418 (9) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT01653418 (9) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil Engraftment After V-BEAM.
NCT01653418 (9) [back to overview]Treatment Related Mortality (TRM) of V-BEAM
NCT01668719 (5) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01668719 (5) [back to overview]Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Elotuzumab in Combination With Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone
NCT01668719 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01668719 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Gr 3 Through 5 Adverse Events That Are Related to Study Drugs
NCT01668719 (5) [back to overview]Response (Partial Response [PR] or Better) Rate
NCT01672736 (1) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose of the Combination of ASP7487 (OSI-906) With Velcade and Dexamethasone
NCT01695330 (1) [back to overview]The Primary Objective of This Study Will be to Investigate the Incidence and Severity of Peripheral Neuropathy Caused by a Prior Intravenous VELCADE-containing Regimen in Comparison to That Caused by a Subcutaneous VELCADE-containing Regimen.
NCT01706666 (3) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT01706666 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Patients Experiencing a Stringent Complete Response (sCR) After 12 Cycles, 24 Months
NCT01706666 (3) [back to overview]Survival Time
NCT01720043 (1) [back to overview]Efficacy of Velcade
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]QLQ-C30 Question 30
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]Maximum Depth of Response During Maintenance Therapy
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]Maximum Depth of Response During Induction Therapy
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]Severe Adverse Event Rate
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR) During Induction Therapy
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]Median Progression-free Survival
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]Median Duration of Response
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]Functionality as Assessed Using the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Geriatric Assessment Tool
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]Median Time to Response
NCT01729338 (11) [back to overview]QLQ-C30 Question 29
NCT01734928 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate by Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC)
NCT01734928 (6) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival by Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC)
NCT01734928 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01734928 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 5 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT01734928 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT01734928 (6) [back to overview]Duration of Response by Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC)
NCT01736943 (3) [back to overview]Toxicity Information Recorded Will Include the Type, Severity, Time of Onset, Time of Resolution, and the Probable Association With the Study Regimen.
NCT01736943 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01736943 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Grade II-IV GVHD
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-free and Overall Survival
NCT01754389 (5) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Relapse
NCT01769209 (7) [back to overview]Related Adverse Events (Grade 3, 4, 5)
NCT01769209 (7) [back to overview]Response Rate (RR)
NCT01769209 (7) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT01769209 (7) [back to overview]Failure-free Survival (FFS)
NCT01769209 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01769209 (7) [back to overview]Complete Response (CR)
NCT01769209 (7) [back to overview]Complete Response Without Platelet Recovery (CRp)
NCT01782963 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate
NCT01782963 (6) [back to overview]Mean Plasma Bortezomib Concentration Following Intravenous and and Subcutaneous Injection
NCT01782963 (6) [back to overview]Median Time to Response
NCT01782963 (6) [back to overview]Median Progression Free Survival
NCT01782963 (6) [back to overview]Median Overall Survival
NCT01782963 (6) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment Related Adverse Events
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Systemic Clearance (CL) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinite Time (AUC[0-infinity]) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time at Last Observed Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response to Treatment at Day 11 of Cycle 8
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response to Treatment at Day 1 of Cycle 7
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response to Treatment at Day 1 of Cycle 5
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 11 of Cycle 8
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 1 of Cycle 7
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 1 of Cycle 5
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 1 of Cycle 3
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Score at Baseline
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time at Last Observed Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Elimination Half-Life Period (T1/2) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Terminal Rate Constant (Lambda[z]) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Terminal Rate Constant (Lambda[z]) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Area Under First Moment Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUMC) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Area Under First Moment Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUMC) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinite Time (AUC[0-infinity]) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Elimination Half-Life Period (T1/2) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Bortezomib in the Body on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Bortezomib in the Body on Day 11 of Cycle 1
NCT01801436 (29) [back to overview]Systemic Clearance (CL) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1
NCT01818752 (7) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT01818752 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT01818752 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT01818752 (7) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT01818752 (7) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT01818752 (7) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01818752 (7) [back to overview]European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) Scores
NCT01833143 (3) [back to overview]Participants Evaluated for Toxicity
NCT01833143 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT01833143 (3) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival
NCT01849783 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Serious Treatment-Related Complications
NCT01849783 (4) [back to overview]Mean Change in Quality-Of-Life Indicators Post-Transplant
NCT01849783 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Able to Complete Full Course Therapy
NCT01849783 (4) [back to overview]Median Progression Free Survival (mPFS)
NCT01860170 (3) [back to overview]GVHD
NCT01860170 (3) [back to overview]Dose Limiting Toxicity
NCT01860170 (3) [back to overview]Engraftment
NCT01891968 (1) [back to overview]Overall Response (OR)
NCT01929980 (1) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Response
NCT02037256 (2) [back to overview]>= 2 Fold Increase in Circulating PBSC's
NCT02037256 (2) [back to overview]Time to Neutrophil Engraftment
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Recommended Dose of Dexamethasone in Combination With Plitidepsin and Bortezomib
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival Rates
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Event-free Survival Rates
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Recommended Dose of Plitidepsin in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Recommended Dose of Bortezomib in Combination With Plitidepsin and Dexamethasone
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT02100657 (12) [back to overview]Time to Progression Rates
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Event-free Survival (EFS) for Modified Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Backbone With or Without Bortezomib in All Randomized Patients
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-LLy Patients Treated With HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Have Complete or Partial Remission and Those Who do Not Respond
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-ALL Patients Treated With High Risk (HR) Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Become Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative and Those Who Remain MRD Positive at the End of HR Block 3
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]EFS for Standard (SR) and Intermediate Risk (IR) T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no Cranial Radiation Therapy [CRT]) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Received CRT)
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Toxicity Rates Associated With Modified Standard Therapy, Including Dexamethasone and Additional Pegaspargase
NCT02112916 (6) [back to overview]Cumulative Incidence Rates of Isolated Central Nervous System (CNS) Relapse for SR and IR T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no CRT) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Receive CRT)
NCT02136134 (6) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02136134 (6) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression (TTP)
NCT02136134 (6) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02136134 (6) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02136134 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With a Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
NCT02136134 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein Response
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning Score
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Better
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival on Next Line of Therapy (PFS2)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression (TTP)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Time to Next Treatment (TNT)
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Time to Response
NCT02195479 (16) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Transplant-Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS)
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With GVHD-free Survival
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse or Progression
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD Requiring Immunosupressive Therapy
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival
NCT02208037 (13) [back to overview]Donor Cell Engraftment
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Count of Participants That Experience Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Incidence of Grade 3-4 Adverse Events From the Combination of Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Based on the Common Terminology Criteria Version 4.0
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Count of Participants That Experience Overall Response Following 4 Cycles of the Combination Regimen BBd
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Count of Participants That Experience Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02224729 (5) [back to overview]Count of Participants That Experience Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR)
NCT02254551 (1) [back to overview]Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of LDE225 Plus Bortezomib
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration for INCB052793
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Itacitinib
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for INCB052793
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: AUC0-τ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over Dosing Interval for Itacitinib
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: AUC0-τ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over Dosing Interval for INCB052793
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1A and 1B: Percentage of Participants With Response as Determined by Investigator's Assessment
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a and 1b: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 2: Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE and SAE
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Hematological Malignancies
NCT02265510 (10) [back to overview]Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration for Itacitinib
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Minimal Response Rate (MRR) Per Investigator
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: Lambda_z
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: T1/2
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR) Per Investigator
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: Vz/F
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by FACT/GOG-Ntx Total Score
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Near Complete Response (nCR)/ Complete Response (CR) Rate
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Time to Progression/Relapse (TTP) Per Investigator
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: AUClast, AUC0-24h, AUC0-48h, AUCinf
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR) Per Investigator
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: Cmax
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: CL/F
NCT02290431 (16) [back to overview]Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: Tmax
NCT02370693 (3) [back to overview]Change of Lung Function Measured by Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Between Baseline and 24 Weeks
NCT02370693 (3) [back to overview]Change of Skin Fibrosis Measured by the Rodnan Skin Score Between Baseline and 24 Weeks
NCT02370693 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
NCT02375555 (6) [back to overview]Grade 3 and 4 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Rate
NCT02375555 (6) [back to overview]4 Cycle Response Rate
NCT02375555 (6) [back to overview]4 Cycle Ever Dose Modification (DM) Rate
NCT02375555 (6) [back to overview]Median Time to Response
NCT02375555 (6) [back to overview]Successful Stem Cell Mobilization (SC Mob) Rate
NCT02375555 (6) [back to overview]Objective Response Rate (ORR) at End of 8 Cycles of Induction Therapy.
NCT02419755 (1) [back to overview]Number of Relevant Toxicities Related to Therapy
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Haematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Quality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Renal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02424851 (5) [back to overview]Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Infections Post-randomization by Time Point
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Infections Post-randomization by Infection Type
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) - Short Form 36 (SF-36) Score
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Total Score
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Acute GVHD (Grades III-IV)
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Toxicities Post-randomization by Time Point
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Best Response to Treatment After Randomization
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Related Mortality (TRM)
NCT02440464 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Toxicities Post-randomization by Toxicity Type
NCT02481934 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Peripheral Blood Monoclonal Protein Reduction or Stabilization
NCT02481934 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events During NKAE Treatment
NCT02489500 (3) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT02489500 (3) [back to overview]Toxicities
NCT02489500 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Hematologic Response
NCT02535806 (4) [back to overview]2-year Overall Survival Seen With Using Bortezomib in Combination With the ALL R3 Re-induction Regimen in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory ALL or LL.
NCT02535806 (4) [back to overview]Post-induction Level of Minimal Residual Disease Seen With Using Bortezomib in Combination With the ALL R3 Re-induction Regimen in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory ALL or LL.
NCT02535806 (4) [back to overview]Remission Rate Seen With Using Bortezomib in Combination With the ALL R3 Re-induction Regimen in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory ALL or LL.
NCT02535806 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subject With Adverse Events
NCT02553460 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Treatment-related Mortality (TRM)
NCT02703779 (3) [back to overview]Cluster of Differentiation 34 (CD34) Enumeration
NCT02703779 (3) [back to overview]Multiparametric Flow Cytometry - Cluster of Differentiation 34 (CD34)Assessment
NCT02703779 (3) [back to overview]Multiparametric Flow Cytometry - Minimum Residual Disease
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With High B-cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) Expression
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] Score
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS).
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst Pain
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response Rate
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity Rate
NCT02755597 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Time to Partial Response (PR) or Better
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Time to Complete Response or Better
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Time to Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Duration of Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Duration of Complete Response or Better
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Time to Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
NCT02874742 (16) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Better
NCT02877082 (2) [back to overview]Number of Patients Alive and Free of Severe Acute GVHD Following HLA Matched Related or Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Peripheral Blood Transplant
NCT02877082 (2) [back to overview]Total Number of Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Events Related to This Immunosuppressive Regimen
NCT02902965 (7) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Landmark Points - 20 Months
NCT02902965 (7) [back to overview]Safety and Tolerability of Ibrutinib in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone as Measured by the Number of Participants With Adverse Events.
NCT02902965 (7) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT02902965 (7) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02902965 (7) [back to overview]Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02902965 (7) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02902965 (7) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) at 24 Months
NCT02928029 (3) [back to overview]Phase 1: The Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Drug-related TEAEs, and Treatment-emergent Serious AE
NCT02928029 (3) [back to overview]Phase 1: The Number of Subjects With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
NCT02928029 (3) [back to overview]Phase 1: MTD/RP2D Determined by the Incidence of DLTs
NCT02951819 (9) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT02951819 (9) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT02951819 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent-Adverse Event
NCT02951819 (9) [back to overview]Time to Disease Progression (TTP)
NCT02951819 (9) [back to overview]Progression Free Survival (PFS)
NCT02951819 (9) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR) or Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
NCT02951819 (9) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT02951819 (9) [back to overview]Time to Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
NCT02951819 (9) [back to overview]Time to Partial Response (PR) or Better
NCT03110562 (1) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRC
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Duration of Response
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Disease Control Rate
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival at 6 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival at 12 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival at 6 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Disease at 6 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival at 12 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival at 3 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Progression-free Survival
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival at 3 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival at 12 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Disease at 12 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Progression Disease at 3 Months
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Overall Survival
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate
NCT03117361 (19) [back to overview]Event-free Survival
NCT03201965 (1) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Overall Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]D-VMP, D-Rd and D-Kd Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]D-VMP, D-Rd, and D-Kd Cohorts: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]D-VMP, D-Rd, and D-Kd Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With VGPR or Better Response
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anti-rHuPH20 Antibodies
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Anti-Daratumumab Antibodies
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With CR or Better Response
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]D-VRd Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]D-VMP, D-Rd, and D-Kd Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Rate
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Infusion-Related Reactions (IRRs)
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Daratumumab
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Daratumumab
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Daratumumab
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Daratumumab
NCT03412565 (14) [back to overview]D-VRd Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Bone Lesions (Bone Evaluation)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]PFS From the Start of Study Treatment
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months From the Start of Study Treatment
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive or Negative in Bone Marrow in Participants Who Achieved CR
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Based on Global Health Status Scale of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Based on Global Health Status Scale of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieve or Maintain Any Best Response
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Relative Dose Intensity (RDI)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS) From the Start of Study Treatment
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Duration of Hospital Stay Per Participants
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Events With Hospitalization Per Participants-Month
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Continuing Treatment With Ixazomib at 12 Months From the Start of Study Treatment
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Achieved VGPR or Better (CR + VGPR)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Duration of Therapy (DOT)
NCT03416374 (21) [back to overview]Evaluation of Modified Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Overall Survival (OS)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Time to Response (TTR)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Best Response (BR)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Time to Progression (TTP)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Clinical Benefit (DOCB)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Clinical Benefit Rate (≥ Minimal Response)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Phase 1: Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Phase 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
NCT03481556 (12) [back to overview]Duration of Response (DOR)
NCT03945591 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience Acute GvHD
NCT03945591 (2) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants Who Experience Moderate to Severe Chronic GvHD

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For a detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00006184)
Timeframe: 9 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Recipient - Chemotherapy Group10
Donor - Vaccination Generation Group10

[back to top]

Immune Response

Immune cell depletion is defined as immunosuppression of participants T cells prior to transplant measured by cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) counts (i.e. cells) > 50 cells per ul.Immune T-cell depletion helps to reduce the ability to reject allogeneic cells in participants and is required for engraftment. Engraftment is the body's ability to accept donor cells. (NCT00006184)
Timeframe: 105 days

InterventionParticpants (Number)
Recipient - Chemotherapy Group7

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00023712)
Timeframe: From study entry, up to 5 years following disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 1 - Bortezomib 1.5 (mg/m2)18.2
Cohort 2 - Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)27.2

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Progression is defined according to RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since study entry, the appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, global deterioration in health status attributable to the disease requiring a change in therapy without objective evidence of progression, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (NCT00023712)
Timeframe: From study entry up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 1 - Bortezomib 1.5 (mg/m2)1.5
Cohort 2 - Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)1.4

[back to top]

Tumor Response Duration

RECIST 1.0 defines complete response as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions and no evidence of new lesions documented by two disease assessments at least 4 weeks apart. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest dimensions (LD) of all target measurable lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. There can be no unequivocal progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions. Documentation by two disease assessments at least 4 weeks apart is required. In the case where the ONLY target lesion is a solitary pelvic mass measured by physical exam, which is not radiographically measurable, a 50% decrease in the LD is required. These patients will have their response classified according to the definitions stated above. Complete and partial responses are included in the objective tumor response rate. (NCT00023712)
Timeframe: From study entry, up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort 1 - Bortezomib 1.5 (mg/m2)3.9
Cohort 2 - Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)24.1

[back to top]

Frequency and Severity of Observed Adverse Events

(NCT00023712)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PlateletsAbsolute neutrophil count (ANC)FatigueRashDiarrheaConstipationGenitourinary/renalHepaticInfectionMetabolicNeuropathy (sensory)PainPulmonary
Grade 0 AEs Cohort 1 - Bortezomib 1.5 (mg/m2)1418414131724212321141221
Grade 0 AEs Cohort 2 - Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)1621717211125222524151526
Grade 1 AEs (CTCAE v 2.0) Cohort 2 - Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)105119573624850
Grade 1 AEs (CTCAE v.2.0) Cohort 1 - Bortezomib 1.5 (mg/m2)95106741313680
Grade 2 AEs (CTCAE v 2.0) Cohort 1 - Bortezomib 1.5 (mg/m2)02104250110353
Grade 2 AEs (CTCAE v 2.0) Cohort 2 - Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)3363391121472
Grade 3 AEs (CTCAE v 2.0) Cohort 1 - Bortezomib 1.5 (mg/m2)3112401002312
Grade 3 AEs (CTCAE v 2.0) Cohort 2 - Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)0050000000221
Grade 4 AEs (CTCAE v 2.0) Cohort 1 - Bortezomib 1.5 (mg/m2)0010000110000
Grade 4 AEs (CTCAE v 2.0) Cohort 2- Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)0000020000000

[back to top]

Objective Partial/Complete Tumor Response Based on the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Criteria

Number of participants who experienced an objective tumor response up to 5 years. Per RECIST version 1.0 criteria: each target lesion must be >= 20 mm when measured by conventional techniques, including palpation, plain x-ray, CT, and MRI, or >= 10 mm when measured by spiral CT. Complete Response is a disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. Partial Response is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest dimensions (LD) of all target measurable lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. (NCT00023712)
Timeframe: From study entry until disease progression/intolerable toxicity/study withdrawal

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort 1 - Bortezomib 1.5 (mg/m2)1
Cohort 2 - Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2)2

[back to top]

Response Rate

The response probability will be estimated. The 95% confidence interval will be provided. (NCT00023764)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PS-341 (Bortezomib)-Relapsed Patients11
PS-341 (Bortezomib)-Refractory Patients6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00054665)
Timeframe: 43 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Part A: PS-341 Alone23
Part B: PS-341 & EPOCH44

[back to top]

Clinical Response Rate

Clinical Response Rate is the number of participants with a partial and complete response assessed by the criteria for lymphoma. A complete response is complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy and normalization of those biochemical abnormalities. Partial response is a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease (NCT00054665)
Timeframe: 18 weeks

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Partial responseComplete response
Part A: PS-341 Alone10
Part B: PS-341 & EPOCH78

[back to top]

Change in Patterns of Gene Expression Pre- and Post-treatment Performed by GeneChip Analysis

Number of Participants with a Change in Gene Expression from Pre to Post Treatment (NCT00061932)
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stratum 1 (Previously Untreated)2
Stratum 2 (Previously Treated)2

[back to top]

True Response Rate Evaluated for the Combination of Irinotecan and PS341 by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

CT or MRI imaging scans of measurable lesions were obtained at baseline and every 8 weeks thereafter. Responses were classified according to RECIST criteria (version 1.0) (NCT00061932)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stratum 1 (Previously Untreated)3
Stratum 2 (Previously Treated)1

[back to top]

1-year Progression Free Survival Probability

Progression-free survival is defined as time from randomization to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression is defined using the ECOG Myeloma Response Criteria. Kaplan-Meier method is used to estimate the 1-year progression-free survival probability. 42 eligible and treated patients were included in the analysis. (NCT00075881)
Timeframe: Every 3 months if patient is <2 years from study entry, every 6 months if patient is 2-6 years from study entry, no specific requirment if patient is more than 6 years from study entry

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PS-34136.4

[back to top]

Response Rate on Reinduction

ECOG Myeloma Response Criteria that follows the standard European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant criteria was used to evaluate patient response and progression. Patients who have complete disappearance of an M-protein and no evidence of myeloma in the bone marrow are considered to have complete response. 7 eligible and treated patients were included in the analysis. (NCT00075881)
Timeframe: participants were evaluated prior to each cycle, up to 23 cycles with a median number of 3 cycles. 1 cycle=21 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PS-34128.6

[back to top]

Response Rate on Maintenance

ECOG Myeloma Response Criteria that follows the standard European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant criteria was used to evaluate patient response and progression. Patients who have complete disappearance of an M-protein and no evidence of myeloma in the bone marrow are considered to have complete response. 15 eligible and treated patients were included in the analysis. (NCT00075881)
Timeframe: participants were evaluated prior to each cycle, up to 45 cycles with a median number of 9 cycles. 1 cycle=21 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PS-34166.7

[back to top]

Response Rate on Induction

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Myeloma Response Criteria that follows the standard European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant criteria was used to evaluate patient response and progression. Patients who have complete disappearance of an M-protein and no evidence of myeloma in the bone marrow are considered to have complete response. 42 eligible and treated patients were included in the analysis. (NCT00075881)
Timeframe: participants were evaluated prior to each cycle, up to 8 cycles with a median number of 6 cycles. 1 cycle=21 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PS-34147.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at 3 Years From Initiation of Study Treatment

In patients with no confirmed Partial Response, Near Complete Response, or Complete Response, progression was defined as a >25% increase from baseline in myeloma protein production or other signs of disease progression such as hypercalcemia, etc. (NCT00081939)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Study Treatment77

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as time from registration to death from any cause. Patients alive were censored at follow up. Analysis was conducted in the 38 eligible and treated patients. (NCT00083226)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Doxorubicin+Bortezomib)6.4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Time from registration to disease progression or death, whichever occurred earlier. Patients alive and progression-free were censored at last follow up. 36 eligible and treated patients were included in the analysis. The other 2 eligible and treated patients had no disease status information. (NCT00083226)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 cycles while on treatment. After discontinuing treatment, assessed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 year.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Doxorubicin+Bortezomib)2.2

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate Measured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Tumor response was measured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0. Objective response rate included complete response (disappearance of all tumor lesions) and partial response (At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.). (NCT00083226)
Timeframe: assessed every 3 cycles while on treatment. After discontinuing treatment, assessed every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Doxorubicin+Bortezomib)3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00084747)
Timeframe: up to 5 years from time of consent

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib55

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Disease Progression: The day when bone marrow recurrence and/or new lytic bone marrow lesions on radiograph and/or progressive M-component paraprotein (~ 25% increase) were detected. Paraprotein progression will be confirmed labs on the consecutive month. (NCT00084747)
Timeframe: signed consent to progression or end of trial. Up to 5 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib29

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Time from initiation of therapy to first progressive disease. (NCT00085410)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I5.8

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective Response Rate (ORR) was determined by best response on radiologic assessment (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0. (NCT00085410)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stable DiseasePartial Response (Unconfirmed)Progressive DiseaseWithdrew Consent Before Evaluation
Arm I10181

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate

Best response to study treatment was confirmed complete response, partial response, or stable disease. Unconfirmed partial response was not included. The outcome measure data table is stratified into patients who a) received prior therapy b) did not receive prior therapy. (NCT00085410)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Patients who received prior therapyPatients who did not receive prior therapy
Arm I2132

[back to top]

1-year Survival

The time from initiation of initiation of therapy to 1 year beyond. (NCT00085410)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I38

[back to top]

6-Month Survival

The time from initiation of therapy to 6 months beyond. (NCT00085410)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm I70

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The time from initiation of therapy to death or last follow-up. (NCT00085410)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I9

[back to top]

6-Month and 1-Year Survival: Patients Who Did Not Derive Clinical Benefit From Study Treatment

The time from initiation of therapy to 6 months beyond. Only patients who did not derive clinical benefit from study treatment (progressive disease or unconfirmed partial response was best response) were included. (NCT00085410)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
6-Month Survival1-Year Survival
Arm I4411

[back to top]

6-Month and 1-Year Survival for Patients Who Derived Clinical Benefit From Study Treatment

The time from initiation of therapy to 6 months beyond. Only patients who derived benefit from study treatment (stable disease, partial response, or complete response was best response) were included. (NCT00085410)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
6-Month Survival1-Year Survival
Arm I9069

[back to top]

The Primary Endpoint of This Trial is the Proportion of Patients Alive at 1 Year. Phase II Patients Only.

The primary endpoint of this trial is the proportion of patients alive at 1 year (i.e., 365 days) after study registration. Proportion of successes, defined as the number of patients alive at one year divided by the total number of evaluable patients. (NCT00093756)
Timeframe: At 1 year

Interventionproportion of Participants (Number)
PhaseII0.73

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

The distribution of progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from registration to the time of progression or death, whichever comes first. The PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00093756)
Timeframe: From study registration to the first of either death due to any cause or progression, up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II8.4

[back to top]

Frequency and Severity of Observed Toxicity, Graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

Toxicity was reported after the first 21 days of treatment and after each 28 day cycle thereafter. Events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0. The number of patients reporting grade 3 and higher are tabulated. (NCT00093756)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3 Adverse EventGrade 4 Adverse Event
Phase II2215

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is defined as the time from registration to the time to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00093756)
Timeframe: From registration to death due to any cause, up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II25

[back to top]

Confirmed Tumor Response

Response was assessed using the RECIST v1.1 criteria. Patients were evaluated at 4 weeks post-RT, 3 months post-RT, every 3 months for 1 year post-RT, and every 6 months thereafter for a maximum of 5 years from time of registration. A Complete Response (CR) is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. A Partial Response (PR) is defined as at least a 20% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions from baseline. A confirmed response is defined as a CR or PR as the objective status on 2 consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart. (NCT00093756)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)
PhaseII34

[back to top]

Response Rate on Step 1

Tumor response was evaluated via Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0, and response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response among all eligible and treated patients. Complete response was defined as disappearance of all tumor lesions. Partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. (NCT00103259)
Timeframe: Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles until progression or intolerable toxicity with maximum of 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Bortezomib+Irinotecan)13.1
Arm II (Bortezomib)2.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival on Step 1

Progression-free survival was defined as time from registration to step 1 to disease recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was measured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0, and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. (NCT00103259)
Timeframe: Every 3 months for first 2 years from protocol entry, then every 6 months until 3 years from study entry

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Bortezomib+Irinotecan)1.6
Arm II (Bortezomib)1.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival on Step 1

Overall survival was defined as time from registration on step 1 to death from any cause. It was evaluated in all 61 eligible and treated patients. (NCT00103259)
Timeframe: Survival was assessed every 3 month within 2 years and every 6 months betwen 2 and 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Bortezomib+Irinotecan)9.1
Arm II (Bortezomib)7.3

[back to top]

Response Rate on Step 2

Tumor response was evaluated via Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0, and response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response among all eligible and treated patients. Complete response was defined as disappearance of all tumor lesions. Partial response was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions. (NCT00103259)
Timeframe: Tumor response was assessed after every 2 cycles until progression or intolerable toxicity with maximum of 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cross-over From Bortezomib to Combined Arm0

[back to top]

Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response

(NCT00103376)
Timeframe: 3 months after the start of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Part A: Velcade1
Part B: (Velcade+LH-RH Antagonist+Adrogen Receptor)6
Part A + Part B5

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event by CTCAE v. 2.0

(NCT00103376)
Timeframe: From start of treatment until end of study, up to 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Part A Only: Velcade8
Part B (Velcade+Lh-RH Antagonist+ Androgen Receptor)7
Part A + Part B8

[back to top]

Time to PSA Progression

PSA progression is defined as a PSA increase of 50% over the nadir CR or CR/PR value on three successive PSA measurements two months apart to a value of >= 1.0 ng/ml. (NCT00103376)
Timeframe: From on study until time of PSA progression for up to two years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Part B and Part A + Part B5.49

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Median time to progression of disease is assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria or death from any cause. IMWG criteria: increase of >=25% from lowest level in Serum M-component or (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dL]); Urine M component or (the absolute increase must be >=200 milligram per 24 hour. Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels. The absolute increase >10 mg/dL. Bone marrow plasma cell percentage >=10%. Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing. Development of hypercalcemia. Participants who died or dropped out due to any reason without progression will be censored with the day of death or drop-out, respectively and who are alive at the end of the study without any progression was censored with the last available date. (NCT00103506)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year and 4 months (From date of first participant randomization [20 December 2004] up to interim analysis cut-off date [28 April 2006])

InterventionMonths (Median)
Velcade (Bortezomib) Monotherapy6.5
Doxil/Caelyx Plus Velcade (Bortezomib)9.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to date of death from any cause. If the participant is alive or the vital status is unknown, the participant will be censored at the date the participant will be last known to be alive. (NCT00103506)
Timeframe: Up to 9 years and 5 months (From date of first participant randomization [20 December 2004] to cut-off date for final survival analysis (16 May 2014)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Velcade (Bortezomib) Monotherapy30.8
Doxil/Caelyx Plus Velcade (Bortezomib)33.0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT00103506)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year and 11 months (From date of first participant randomization [20 December 2004] to cut-off date for safety update (28 November 2006)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Velcade (Bortezomib) Monotherapy105
Doxil/Caelyx Plus Velcade (Bortezomib)120

[back to top]

Participant Tumor Response Assessed by RECIST

Baseline scan and confirmatory scans obtained 6 weeks following initial documentation of objective response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): >30% decrease in sum longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started. (NCT00104871)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks (minimum of 4 treatment cycles (or 12 weeks))

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Bortezomib00119

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Assessed by RECIST

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT00104871)
Timeframe: At 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib4

[back to top]

Objective Tumor Response Rate Assessed by RECIST

Response Rate calculated as number of participants with Complete or Partial Response divided by total participants. Baseline scan and confirmatory scans obtained 6 weeks following initial documentation of objective response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): >30% decrease in sum longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started. (NCT00104871)
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with adverse events. For a detailed list of adverse events, see the adverse event module. (NCT00108069)
Timeframe: 7.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
GBM (Glioblastoma Multiforme)30
AG (Anaplastic Glioma)12

[back to top]

Adverse Event Grades

The combined serious and non-serious adverse event Table describes count of patients whose highest grade adverse event for any CTC (common terminology criteria) term was related to study drugs for the GBM (Glioblastoma multiforme) and AG (Anaplastic glioma) cohorts. (NCT00108069)
Timeframe: 7.5 years

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
thrombocytopenialymphopeniahypophosphatemiaALT/sGPTanemia (Decreased Hgb)hyponatremiaheadacheleukopeniaAST/sGOTdyspneafatiguefeverhyperkalemiacoughdepression (mood alteration)diarrheadizzinessvenous thrombosisedemahyperbilirubinemiahypermagnesemiahypocalcemiahypokalemiahypotensionelevated creatinineinfection with unknown ANCneutropeniapainrashhemorrhage (rectal)somnolenceurinary frequency
Grade 1194066401212121001011111110001101
Grade 234610022000100110000000000110000
Grade 314300110010000000100000001000010
Grade 410000000000000000000000000000000
Grade 500000000000000000000000000000000
Total2412976533222221111111111111111111

[back to top]

Response, Defined as Stable Disease or Objective (Partial or Complete) Response.

Complete response (CR) is complete disappearance of all measurable and evaluable disease. No new lesions. No evidence of non-evaluable disease. All measurable, evaluable and non-evaluable lesions and site must be assessed using the same techniques as baseline. Patients who respond must be on the same or decreasing doses of dexamethasone. Partial response (PR) is greater than or equal to a 50% decrease compared to baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable disease. No new lesions. All measurable and evaluable lesions and sites must be assessed using same techniques as baseline. Responders must be on the same decreasing doses of dexamethasone. Stable disease (SD) does not qualify for CR, PR, or progression (e.g., a 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions). The designation of stable/no response requires a minimum of 6 weeks duration. All measurable and evaluable sites must be assessed using the same techniques as baseline. (NCT00108069)
Timeframe: Patients were followed for an average of six weeks for assessment of response

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete responsePartial responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
AG (Anaplastic Glioma)00012
GBM (Glioblastoma Multiforme)00127

[back to top]

Laboratory AE Summary

"An AE was defined as any unfavorable/unintended change in the structure/function/chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of study drug, or any worsening of a preexisting condition.~A SAE was any AE that resulted in death, was life threatening, resulted in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in or prolonged an existing inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a new cancer, or was an overdose.~A lab (S)AE was any lab value considered clinically significant in the investigator's judgment." (NCT00111813)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to disease progression, toxicity, or death, assessed up to 29 months

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With one or more laboratory AEsWith no laboratory AEsWith drug-related laboratory AEsWith laboratory Serious AEs (SAEs)With drug-related laboratory SAEsWho diedWho discontinued due to laboratory AEsWho discontinued due to drug-related lab AEsWho discontinued due to laboratory SAEsWho discontinued due to drug-related lab SAEs
Vorinostat 200 mg + Bortezomib 0.7 mg/m^21210000000
Vorinostat 200 mg + Bortezomib 0.9 mg/m^21200000000
Vorinostat 300 mg + Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m^23720000000
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 0.9 mg/m^20600000000
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 1.1 mg/m^22410000000
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m^23330000000

[back to top]

Clinical AE Summary

"An AE was defined as any unfavorable/unintended change in the structure/function/chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of study drug, or any worsening of a preexisting condition.~A serious AE (SAE) was any AE that resulted in death, was life threatening, resulted in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in or prolonged an existing inpatient hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a new cancer, or was an overdose." (NCT00111813)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to disease progression, toxicity, or death, assessed up to 30 days after end of treatment (up to 30 months)

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
With one or more AEsWith no AEsWith drug-related AEsWith Serious AEs (SAEs)With drug-related SAEsWho diedWho discontinued due to AEsWho discontinued due to drug-related AEsWho discontinued due to SAEsWho discontinued due to drug-related SAEs
Vorinostat 200 mg + Bortezomib 0.7 mg/m^23020001000
Vorinostat 200 mg + Bortezomib 0.9 mg/m^23031002200
Vorinostat 300 mg + Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m^2100102104311
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 0.9 mg/m^26064402222
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 1.1 mg/m^26064201100
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m^26062102110

[back to top]

Mean Time to First AE Resulting in a Dose Modification in Either Vorinostat or Bortezomib

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the sponsor's product, was also an adverse experience. (NCT00111813)
Timeframe: Day 1 to disease progression, toxicity, or death, assessed up to 29 months

InterventionDays (Mean)
Vorinostat 200 mg + Bortezomib 0.7 mg/m^2NA
Vorinostat 200 mg + Bortezomib 0.9 mg/m^2NA
Vorinostat 300 mg + Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m^258
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 0.9 mg/m^258
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 1.1 mg/m^2128
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m^232

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Modifications of Either Vorinostat or Bortezomib Due to Adverse Experiences (AEs) After Treatment With Study Drug

An adverse experience (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which was temporally associated with the use of the sponsor's product, was also an adverse experience. (NCT00111813)
Timeframe: Day 1 to disease progression, toxicity, or death, assessed up to 29 months

,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
No dose modificationOne dose modificationTwo or more dose modifications
Vorinostat 200 mg + Bortezomib 0.7 mg/m^2300
Vorinostat 200 mg + Bortezomib 0.9 mg/m^2300
Vorinostat 300 mg + Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m^2820
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 0.9 mg/m^2420
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 1.1 mg/m^2312
Vorinostat 400 mg + Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m^2303

[back to top]

Mean Duration of Treatment With Vorinostat

"Event causing discontinuation from the study was defined as (1) progressive disease OR (2) intolerable toxicity.~Progressive disease was defined as:~>25% increase in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein.~25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion.~>25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine~biopsy.~Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas.~Development of hypercalcemia.~Intolerable toxicity was based on the clinical judgment of the investigator." (NCT00111813)
Timeframe: Day 1 to an event causing discontinuation from the study, assessed up to 29 months

InterventionDays (Mean)
200 mg300 mg400 mg
All Participants4.672.6107.1

[back to top]

Overall Progression Free Survival

Time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression. Progression is defined by at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the sum of the products of at least two lymph nodes, appearance of new lymph nodes, ≥50% increase in the size of the liver and/or spleen as determined by measurement below the respective costal margin, appearance of new palpable hepatomegaly or splenomegaly that was not previously present, and ≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes. (NCT00114738)
Timeframe: up to 9.9 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
EPOCH-R+Bortezomib29.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival is the time between the first day of treatment to the day of death. The primary evaluation will be a Kaplan-Meier analysis with a two tailed log rank test. (NCT00114738)
Timeframe: up to 9.9 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bortezomib Maintenance78.6
Observation87.5
Not Randomized31.6

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression. Progression is defined by at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the sum of the products of at least two lymph nodes, appearance of new lymph nodes, ≥50% increase in the size of the liver and/or spleen as determined by measurement below the respective costal margin, appearance of new palpable hepatomegaly or splenomegaly that was not previously present, and ≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes.The primary evaluation will be a Kaplan-Meier analysis with a two tailed log rank test. (NCT00114738)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bortezomib Maintenance27.2
Observation33.5
Not Randomized7.8

[back to top]

Clinical Response

Clinical response is assessed by the response criteria for lymphomas and is defined as a fraction of patients who have a complete response (CR) or a complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). A complete response is disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, and normalization of those biochemical abnormalities (e.g. lactate dehydrogenase) definitely assignable to the lymphoma. Partial response is ≥50% decreased in the sum of the products of the greatest diameters of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. No increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease. Progressive disease is defined by at least one of the following: ≥50% increase in the sum of the products of at least two lymph nodes appearance of new lymph nodes, ≥50% increase in the size of the liver and/or spleen, ≥50% increase in the absolute number of circulating lymphocytes. (NCT00114738)
Timeframe: up to 22 weeks after initiation of therapy

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Overall Response (CR+PR)Complete ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Evaluable
EPOCH-R+Bortezomib92.586.73.81.91.9

[back to top]

Count of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events

Here is the count of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. (NCT00114738)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 143 months and 7 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
EPOCH-R+Bortezomib53

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival is the time between the first day of treatment to the day of death. The primary evaluation will be a Kaplan-Meier analysis with a two tailed log rank test. (NCT00114738)
Timeframe: up to 9.9 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
EPOCH-R+Bortezomib80.4

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate With Bortezomib Evaluated by Both RECIST Criteria and Computer-assisted Image Analysis.

A response rate of 20% or more with bortezomib would be of interest for further evaluation, whereas a response rate of less than 5% would be of no interest. Response defined as a confirmed CR or PR. (NCT00118144)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Arm 15

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Suvival using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. (NCT00118144)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Mean)
Arm I13.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression Free Survival using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier (NCT00118144)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm 15.5

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate Complete Remission (CR), Remission (R), and Partial Remission (PR).

"Responses are defined as follows:~Complete Remission: Absence of bone marrow or blood findings of multiple myeloma. This includes disappearance of all evidence of serum and urine M-proteins on immunofixation electrophoresis studies. Normalization of serum concentrations of normal immunoglobulins is not required for CR. There must also be no evidence of increasing anemia. Bone marrow cellularity must be ≥ 20% with plasma cells ≤ 5%.~Remission: A ≥ 75% reduction in the serum M-protein, and if a urine M-protein (Bence-Jones protein) is present, either a ≥ 90% reduction in this protein, or a urine M-protein < 0.2gm/day. Bone marrow plasma cells must be ≤ 5%.~Partial Remission: A ≥ 50% reduction in the serum M-protein, and if present, a ≥ 50% reduction in the urine M-protein (Bence-Jones protein). Bone marrow plasma cells must not be increased from baseline level." (NCT00124579)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib With Thalidomide and Dexamethasone14

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

From date of initial registration to date of progression/relapse of disease (> 25% increase from baseline in myeloma protein production or other signs of disease progression such as hypercalcemia, etc.) or death from any cause, whichever came first, up to 5 years (NCT00124579)
Timeframe: about 12-18 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bortezomib With Thalidomide and Dexamethasone8

[back to top]

Toxicity Evaluation

To evaluate the qualitative and quantitative toxicities associated with this regimen. (NCT00124579)
Timeframe: From date of protocol therapy start to date of protocol therapy end, i.e., up to about 3.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Albumin, serum-low (hypoalbuminemia)Allergy/Immunology-OtherBilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)Edema: limbExtremity-lower (gait/walking)Fatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)HemoglobinInf (clin/microbio) w/Gr 3-4 neuts - LungLeukocytes (total WBC)LymphopeniaMuscle weakness, not d/t neuropathy - Extrem-lowerMuscle weakness, not d/t neuropathy - body/generalNeuropathy: motorNeuropathy: sensoryNeutrophils/granulocytes (ANC/AGC)Platelets
Bortezomib + Thal/Dex1111111111111121

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Marker Osteocalcin

Osteocalcin: Any Osteocalcin increase means positive response. (NCT00128921)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort A4
Cohort B3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Markers Like Phosphate.

Phosphate: any Phosphate increase would refer to a positive response. (NCT00128921)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort A0
Cohort B0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by the Bone Marker Parathyroid Hormone

Parathyroid hormone: Any increase in PTH was considered response (NCT00128921)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort A4
Cohort B3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Markers Like Magnesium

Magnesium: Any Magnesium increase would refer to a positive response. (NCT00128921)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort A0
Cohort B0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Markers Like Calcium

Calcium: any Calcium increase would refer to a positive response. (NCT00128921)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort A0
Cohort B0

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Positive Response to Bortezomib Measured by Bone Marker Alkaline Phosphatase

Alkaline phosphatase: If the Alkaline phosphatase increases it's considered positive response (NCT00128921)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cohort A4
Cohort B3

[back to top]

Efficacy of Drug Combination as Therapy for Myeloma (Overall Response Rate)

Myeloma response criteria developed by Bladé et al. was used to categorize response. (NCT00148317)
Timeframe: Best response at any point during each respective study phase was collected - once after consolidation/prior to mobilization (approximately 6 cycles after start of treatment), and once after mobilization

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stringent Complete Response (sCR)Complete Response (CR)Very Good Partial response (VGPR)Partial Response (PR)Other Response (progression, stable disease, etc)
Treatment Arm - Post Mobilization436131
Treatment Arm - Responses Prior to Mobilization01126

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

"Response was assessed using IMWG guidelines, which for progressive disease are as follows:~Increase of > 25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following:~Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 0.5 g/dL)*~Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 200 mg/24 h)~Only in patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels; the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels. The absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL~Bone marrow plasma cell percentage; the absolute percentage must be > 10%~Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas~Development of hypercalcaemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder IF starting M protein component is > 5g/dL, then absolute increase of 1g is sufficient for progression." (NCT00148317)
Timeframe: Date of progression, assessed from start of trial to Final data cut off date (15 April 2011)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment Arm (All Patients)46.6

[back to top]

Yield of CD34+ Stem Cells

This is the yield of CD34+ stem cells collection after high dose cyclophosphamide. (NCT00148317)
Timeframe: Occurred after mobilization, and prior to Stem cell transplant; a 7 day limit was imposed on stem cell collection

Intervention10^6 cells/kg (Median)
Treatment Arm - Post Bortezomib-based Mobilization23.2

[back to top]

ORR

Overall Response Rate (NCT00151320)
Timeframe: 6 cycles (18 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Untreated DLBCL88
Untreated MCL81

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from study entry to the earliest documentation of disease progression (PD) or death. Participants alive without evidence of PD were censored at the earliest date of last disease assessment or date of initiation of non-protocol therapy. PD was established based European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (Blade J et al Br J Haematol 1998). PD required 1 or more of the following: >25% increase in serum monoclonal protein with absolute minimum of 0.5 g/dL (confirmed on repeat investigation); >25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion with minimum absolute increase of 200 mg/24 hrs (confirmed on repeat investigation); >25% increase in bone marrow plasma cells with minimum absolute increase of 10%; Definite increase in size of existing soft tissue plasmacytomas and/or lytic lesions or new; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL not attributable to other cause). (NCT00153920)
Timeframe: Disease was assessed every two cycles on treatment and every 6 weeks in long-term follow-up. Median follow-up was 29 months as of the data analysis.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib17.0

[back to top]

Objective Response (OR) Rate

Objective response was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (Blade J et al Br J Haematol 1998). CR required all of the following: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine at two consecutive times for minimum 6 weeks; Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for at least 6 weeks; <5% plasma cells in bone marrow on 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks; No increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions. PR required all the following: ≥50% reduction in the level of the serum monoclonal protein on 2 determinations for minimum 6 weeks; If present, reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion either by ≥90% or to <200 mg on 2 determinations for minimum 6 weeks; ≥50% reduction size of soft tissue plasmacytomas for minimum 6 weeks; No increase in the number or size of lytic bone lesions. Development of a compression fracture does not exclude response in either category. (NCT00153920)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every two cycles on treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Bortezomib0.41

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Neuropathic Pain

Number of participants experiencing any grade treatment-emergent neuropathic pain events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00153920)
Timeframe: Assessed each cycle throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib8

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from start of treatment to documentation of disease progression (PD). Participants without evidence of PD were censored at the latest date of last disease assessment or date of initiation of non-protocol therapy. PD was established based European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria (Blade J et al Br J Haematol 1998). PD required 1 or more of the following: >25% increase in serum monoclonal protein with absolute minimum of 0.5 g/dL (confirmed on repeat investigation); >25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion with minimum absolute increase of 200 mg/24 hrs (confirmed on repeat investigation); >25% increase in bone marrow plasma cells with minimum absolute increase of 10%; Definite increase in size of existing or new soft tissue plasmacytomas and/or lytic lesions; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL not attributable to other cause). (NCT00153920)
Timeframe: Disease was assessed every two cycles on treatment and every 6 weeks in long-term follow-up. Median follow-up was 29 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib17.3

[back to top]

Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate

Very good partial response or better was defined per International Uniform Response criteria (Durie B, Harousseau JL, Miquel JS, et al Leukemia 2006). See CR requirements in primary outcome measure plus if serum and urine M protein were unmeasurable then immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) must be in a normal ratio of 0.26-1.65 at two consecutive times. VGPR required the following: Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis; >=90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg per 24 hours (by SPEP and UPEP); if the serum and urine M protein were unmeasurable then a >90% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels. (NCT00153920)
Timeframe: Response was assessed every two cycles on treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Bortezomib.17

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Sensory Neuropathy

Number of participants experiencing any grade treatment-emergent sensory neuropathy events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms. (NCT00153920)
Timeframe: Assessed each cycle throughout treatment from time of first dose and up to day 30 post-treatment. Treatment duration in months was a median (range) of 5.1 (0.8-6.1).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib41

[back to top]

Assess the Toxicity of Combination Rituximab and Velcade™ in Patients With Previously Treated Mantle Cell and Follicular Lymphoma.

The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 will be utilized for adverse event reporting. (NCT00201877)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle

Interventionpatients (Number)
Velcade and Rituximab13

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

To determine the overall survival in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell and follicular lymphoma following treatment with rituximab and Velcade™. (NCT00201877)
Timeframe: Every 3 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
All patientsPatients with follicular lymphomaPatients with MCL
Velcade and Rituximab405529

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival(PFS)

To correlate serial plasma rituximab levels with response and progression-free survival. (NCT00201877)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
All patientsResponding patients
Velcade and Rituximab2460

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Progressive Disease (PD) will be defined as a greater than 25% increase in serum IgM monoclonal protein levels from the lowest attained response value as determined by serum electrophoresis, confirmed by at least one other investigation, or progression of clinically significant disease related symptom(s). (NCT00250926)
Timeframe: 42 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, RituximabNA

[back to top]

Response Rate

"This outcome measure was to determine the response rate along with attainment of stable disease and time to disease progression following treatment with this patient population. The response rates were defined as follows.~A complete response (CR) was defined as having resolution of all symptoms, normalization of serum IgM levels with complete disappearance of IgM paraprotein by immunofixation, absence of bone marrow disease by bone marrow biopsy and aspiration, and resolution of any adenopathy or splenomegaly. A near complete response (nCR) was defined as fulfilling all CR criteria in the presence of a positive immunofixation study. Patients with very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), and minor response (MR) were defined as having a ≥ 90%, ≥ 50%, and 25% to 49% reduction in serum IgM levels, respectively. Progressive disease (PD) occurred when a more than 25% increase in serum IgM level or progression of clinically significant disease parameters was observed." (NCT00250926)
Timeframe: 33.2 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Near Complete Response (nCR)Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)Partial Response (PR)Minor Response (MR)Stable Disease
Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, Rituximab3231131

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

This outcome measure was to assess the safety and tolerability of bortezomib, dexamethasone and rituximab in patients with untreated Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia. (NCT00250926)
Timeframe: 33.2 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, Rituximab23

[back to top]

Time to Best Response

(NCT00250926)
Timeframe: 33.2 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, Rituximab15

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

(NCT00256776)
Timeframe: 3 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Thal + Dex + Velcade18.3
Thal + Dex13.6

[back to top]

Median Time to Progression (TTP)

(NCT00256776)
Timeframe: 3 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Thal + Dex + Velcade19.5
Thal + Dex13.8

[back to top]

Response Rate After 2 Courses of Therapy

Response was evaluated after two cycles of therapy using the 1999 Cheson response criteria. All responses were based on CT scans. The criteria that were developed include anatomic definitions of response, with normal lymph node size after treatment of 1.5 cm in the longest transverse diameter by computer-assisted tomography scan. A designation of complete response/unconfirmed was adopted to include patients with a greater than 75% reduction in tumor size after therapy but with a residual mass, to include patients-especially those with large-cell NHL-who may not have residual disease. For patients who had FDG-PET imaging, metabolic response was defined as a decrease in the standardized uptake value in target lesions (regions of abnormal FDG uptake on pretreatment FDG-PET images) to below three on posttreatment FDG-PET imaging). All PET scans were reviewed and interpreted by a single radiologist (SV). (NCT00262860)
Timeframe: 21 Days/course for up to 2 courses

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride4

[back to top]

Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 1)

Peripheral blood (40 ml) was collected on cycle 1, day 1 of prebortezomib at baseline and 2 hrs post-bortezomib treatment. The samples were refrigerated at 4C and processed within 36 h of collection. Frozen cell lysates were thawed and the proteasome activity in 10 microliters was determined using a spectroflourometric 20S proteasome assay kit. Samples were run in triplicate on two separate days. The percent change between baseline and 2 hrs (day1, cycle 1) was calculated. (NCT00262860)
Timeframe: baseline to 2 hours

InterventionPercentage of change in proteosome activ (Median)
Bortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride-50

[back to top]

Change in Proteasome Activity Compared to Baseline (Cycle 2)

Peripheral blood (40 ml) was collected at baseline and 1-2 weeks after cycle 2, day 11 post-bortezomib treatment. The samples were refrigerated at 4C and processed within 36 h of collection. Frozen cell lysates were thawed and the proteasome activity in 10 microliters was determined using a spectroflourometric 20S proteasome assay kit. Samples were run in triplicate on two separate days. The percent change between baseline and 2 hrs (day1, cycle 1) was calculated. (NCT00262860)
Timeframe: baseline and 1-2 weeks after cycle 2, day 11

Interventionpercentage of change in proteosome activ (Median)
Bortezomib, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride-57

[back to top]

Average Number of Erthroid Burst Forming Units in Bone Marrow

Colony forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) progenitors, erythroid burst forming units (BFU-E), and leukemia colony forming units (CFU-L) were measured at day 0 and day 14 of cycle 1. Five × 10(4) light density cell for granulocyte-macrophage colony forming unit (CFU-GM) or erythroid burst forming unit (BFU-E) assays were plated in 0.9% methylcellulose, 30% FCS, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 10-4 mol/L β-mercaptoethanol, and 1% BSA with 3U/ml human erythropoietin, 10 ng/ml GM-CSF, 10 ng/ml IL-3, and 50 ng/ml stem cell factor (SCF) (c-kit ligand). For leukemia colony forming units (CFU-Ls), the plating mixture was comparable with the exception that the cytokines utilized were 4 U/ml erythropoietin, 10 ng/ml GM-CSF, 10 ng/ml IL-3, 100 ng/ml c-kit ligand, and 100 ng/ml Flt3 ligand. The methylcellulose mixture and associated reagents were purchased from Stem Cell Technologies (Vancouver, BC). Colonies were scored at Day 14 and were defined as > 20 grouped cells. (NCT00262873)
Timeframe: day 14

Interventionnumber of colonies per 50000 cell plated (Mean)
pre bortezomibpost bortezomib
Bortezomib14.7514.75

[back to top]

Average Number of Leukemia Forming Units in Bone Marrow

Colony forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) progenitors, erythroid burst forming units (BFU-E), and leukemia colony forming units (CFU-L) were measured at day 0 and day 14 of cycle 1. Five × 10(4) light density cell for granulocyte-macrophage colony forming unit (CFU-GM) or erythroid burst forming unit (BFU-E) assays were plated in 0.9% methylcellulose, 30% FCS, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 10-4 mol/L β-mercaptoethanol, and 1% BSA with 3U/ml human erythropoietin, 10 ng/ml GM-CSF, 10 ng/ml IL-3, and 50 ng/ml stem cell factor (SCF) (c-kit ligand). For leukemia colony forming units (CFU-Ls), the plating mixture was comparable with the exception that the cytokines utilized were 4 U/ml erythropoietin, 10 ng/ml GM-CSF, 10 ng/ml IL-3, 100 ng/ml c-kit ligand, and 100 ng/ml Flt3 ligand. The methylcellulose mixture and associated reagents were purchased from Stem Cell Technologies (Vancouver, BC). Colonies were scored at Day 14 and were defined as > 20 grouped cells. (NCT00262873)
Timeframe: day 14

Interventionnumber of colonies per 50000 cell plated (Mean)
pre bortezomibpost bortezomib
Bortezomib27.6554.28

[back to top]

Average Percentage of Light Density Cells in Apoptosis

The CD34+ fraction of light density marrow obtained from patients at baseline and while receiving bortezomib were assessed through measurement of Annexin V (assay obtained form R&D Systems) and by flow cytometry analysis. (NCT00262873)
Timeframe: day 14

Interventionpercentage of apoptotic cells (Mean)
pre bortezomibpost bortezomib
Bortezomib6.6811.37

[back to top]

Interleukin 6 Levels in Serum

"interleukin-6 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay ELISA in serum from participants exposed to bortezomib.~Levels were measured at Day 0 and Day 14 of cycle 1 of the clinical trial." (NCT00262873)
Timeframe: day 14

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
pre bortezomibpost bortezomib
Bortezomib6.88.6

[back to top]

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Levels in Serum

VEGF levels were measured by ELISA (R&DSystems) in serum from participants exposed to bortezomib. Levels were measured at Day 0 and Day 14 of cycle 1 of the clinical trial. (NCT00262873)
Timeframe: day 14

Interventionpg/ml (Mean)
pre bortezomibpost bortezomib
Bortezomib402254

[back to top]

Average Number of Colony Forming Unit-granulocyte-macrophages in Bone Marrow

Colony forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) progenitors, erythroid burst forming units (BFU-E), and leukemia colony forming units (CFU-L) were measured at day 0 and day 14 of cycle 1. Five × 10(4) light density cell for granulocyte-macrophage colony forming unit (CFU-GM) or erythroid burst forming unit (BFU-E) assays were plated in 0.9% methylcellulose, 30% FCS, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 10-4 mol/L β-mercaptoethanol, and 1% BSA with 3U/ml human erythropoietin, 10 ng/ml GM-CSF, 10 ng/ml IL-3, and 50 ng/ml stem cell factor (SCF) (c-kit ligand). For leukemia colony forming units (CFU-Ls), the plating mixture was comparable with the exception that the cytokines utilized were 4 U/ml erythropoietin, 10 ng/ml GM-CSF, 10 ng/ml IL-3, 100 ng/ml c-kit ligand, and 100 ng/ml Flt3 ligand. The methylcellulose mixture and associated reagents were purchased from Stem Cell Technologies (Vancouver, BC). Colonies were scored at Day 14 and were defined as > 20 grouped cells. (NCT00262873)
Timeframe: day 14

Interventionnumber of colonies per 50000 cell plated (Mean)
pre bortezomibpost bortezomib
Bortezomib16.128.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event

(NCT00262873)
Timeframe: For 21 days/course for up to 12 courses

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib6

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate as Measured by RECIST Criteria After Every 2 Courses of Treatment for up to 6 Courses

(NCT00276614)
Timeframe: 2 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib2

[back to top]

Clinical Response to Treatment

Clinical evaluations of disease response were determined with each cycle. Bone marrow biopsies were done at baseline and at study termination. Clinical responses were defined by the International Myeloma Working Group criteria: Stringent Complete Response (SCR), CR and normal free light chain ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; Complete Response (CR), Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; Partial Response (PR), ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. Objective response is defined as a best overall response of SCR, CR, VGPR, or PR. (NCT00287872)
Timeframe: 1-6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib and Thalidomide81.5

[back to top]

Peripheral Motor and Sensory Neuropathy (Grade 2 and Higher)

Neuropathy was monitored using Total Neuropathy Score reduced (TNSr). (NCT00287872)
Timeframe: 1-6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib and Thalidomide19

[back to top]

The Time to Response

(NCT00287872)
Timeframe: 1-6 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib and Thalidomide2

[back to top]

Response Rate in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B- and T-cell NHL With Gemcitabine and Bortezomib Combination Treatment.

"Response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory B- and T-cell NHL with Gemcitabine and Bortezomib combination treatment will be defined as the number of patients with Complete Remission [CR] and Partial Remission [PR]. CT scans at screening and after completing cycle 3, cycle 6 and 30 days after Cycle 8 assessed by the Response Criteria for Non-hodgkins Lymphoma will be used to determine response where:~CR=Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease PR=> 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses" (NCT00290706)
Timeframe: At screening and after completing cycle 3, cycle 6 and 30 days after Cycle 8

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 + Bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 D1+D81
Phase II Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 + Bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 D1+D152

[back to top]

Toxicity of Participants Receiving Bortezomib, Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, and Prednisone for Treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Toxicity assessed using NCI-CTC v. 3.0 (NCT00295932)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1.3 mg/m2 Bortezomib; 750 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide4
1.6 mg/m2 Bortezomib; 750 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide6
1.6 mg/m2 Bortezomib; 1000 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide3
1.8 mg/m2 Bortezomib; 1000 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide4
Dose Level 1- 1.0 mg/m2 Bortezomib; 750 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamid2
Dose Level 2 - 1.3 mg/m2 Bortezomib; 750 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamid18
Dose Level 3 - 1.3 mg/m2 Bortezomib; 1000 mg/m2 Cyclophospham3
Dose Level 4 - 1.5 mg/m2 Bortezomib; 1000 mg/m2 Cyclophosphami4
Dose Level 5 - 1.3 mg/m2 Bortezomib; 1000 mg/m2 Cyclophospham10
Weekly Bortezomib Dosing Schedule12
Twice-weekly Bortezomib Dosing Schedule13

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose

Maximum tolerated dose of Bortezomib in combination with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone in Phase I participants (NCT00295932)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmg/m^2 of Bortezomib (Number)
Weekly BortezomibTwice-Weekly Bortezomib
Arm I1.81.5

[back to top]

Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Termination

Treatment emergent adverse events observed during outcome measure time frame leading to treatment termination (NCT00298766)
Timeframe: from first study-related procedure to 30 days after last dose of study medication

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Agent VELCADE23

[back to top]

Best Confirmed Hematologic Responders

Hematologic response was determined by the investigator per the response criteria for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis by Gertz (2005). It include Complete and Partial Responders (CR+PR). CR requires serum and urine negative for a monoclonal protein by immunofixation and free light chain ratio normal. PR requires: 1. reduction in quantitative serum M-protein by 50% if baseline value is at least 0.5 g/dL, 2. if light chain is detected in the urine (with a consistent peak and >100 mg/ 24 hours), then 50% reduction is required, 3. if free light chain >10 mg/dL, reduction by 50% is required. (NCT00298766)
Timeframe: from first dose of study medication to end of study visit

Interventionparticipants responded (Number)
Single Agent VELCADE33

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose

"Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose level that has 0/1 out of 6 patients experiences Dose Limited Toxicity (DLT). MTD is defined separately for QW and BIQ dose cohorts.~DLT was defined as adverse events occurring during Cycle 1 and: (1) related to VELCADE, (2) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia, (3) Grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity." (NCT00298766)
Timeframe: 5 weeks in once weekly (QW) dose cohorts and 3 weeks in twice weekly (BIW) dose cohorts

Interventionparticipants with DLT (Number)
Single Agent VELCADE2

[back to top]

Subjects Grade 3/4/5 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

"Grade 3/4/5 treatment emergent adverse events observed during outcome measure time frame.~Grade is determined according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE) Version 3.0." (NCT00298766)
Timeframe: from first study-related procedure to 30 days after last dose of study medication

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Agent VELCADE43

[back to top]

Subjects With Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Serious treatment emergent adverse events observed during outcome measure time frame (NCT00298766)
Timeframe: from first study-related procedure to 30 days after last dose of study medication

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Agent VELCADE25

[back to top]

Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Treatment emergent adverse events observed during outcome measure time frame (NCT00298766)
Timeframe: from first study-related procedure to 30 days after last dose of study medication

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Single Agent VELCADE70

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Median overall survival after first peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). (NCT00307086)
Timeframe: 40 months post transplant

Interventionmonths (Median)
Autologous PBSCT40

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Response Intensive Chemo-immunotherapy Plus Maintenance or Consolidation Bortezomib

"Complete response is:~Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of target lesions and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy and normalization of biochemical abnormalities definitely assignable to NHL~All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size (<= 1.5 cm in the greatest transverse diameter (GTD) for nodes > 1.5 cm prior to therapy) or <= 1 cm for nodes that were 1.1-1.5 cm in the GTD prior to therapy or by more than 75% in the sum of the products of the GTD~The spleen, if enlarged before therapy, must have regressed in size and must not be palpable on physical examination. Any macroscopic nodules in any organs detectable on imaging studies should no longer be present. Other organs enlarged prior to therapy due to involvement of lymphoma must have decreased in size~If bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, infiltrate must be cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate" (NCT00310037)
Timeframe: Up to 10 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm A Maintenance Therapy31
Arm B Consolidation Therapy35

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was measured from the date of study entry to date of death due to any cause. The median OS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00310037)
Timeframe: Up to 10 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Arm A Maintenance TherapyNA
Arm B Consolidation Therapy8.9

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Rate at 18 Months

Progression free survival (PFS) rate at 18 months was defined as the proportion of patients that were alive and progression-free 18 months after registration into the study. The Kaplan-Meier method of 18 month progression-free survival was calculated.. (NCT00310037)
Timeframe: At 18 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A Maintenance Therapy88.5
Arm B Consolidation Therapy96

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival is defined as time from randomization to progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT00312845)
Timeframe: Subjects are followed until progressive disease/death or the end of the study. The median follow up time is 33.9 months.

Interventiondays (Median)
Bortezomib + Rituximab389
Rituximab334

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate is defined as Complete Response (CR) + Complete Response Unconfirmed (CRu) + Partial Response (PR) using International Working Group Criteria (IWGC) and Independent Radiographic Review results and clinical results. The IWGC CR requires complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms, and normalization of lactic dehydrogenase and bone marrow involvement. CRu requires more than 75% reduction in sum of product of nodes (SPD). PR requires moer than 50% reduction in SPD. (NCT00312845)
Timeframe: Subjects are followed until progressive disease/death or the end of the study. The median follow up time is 33.9 months.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib + Rituximab199
Rituximab160

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate

Disease control rate was defined as the rate of partial response (PR) plus stable disease (SD; for at least 2 cycles). (NCT00362882)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 150
Arm 249

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT, MRI or X-ray: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT00362882)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm 110
Arm 210

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Will be estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. (NCT00362882)
Timeframe: From first day of treatment to time of death due to any cause, up to 4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm 113.3
Arm 27.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival @ 6 Months

Estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT00362882)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Arm 130
Arm 217

[back to top]

Relative Dose Intensity of Bortezomib

Relative dose intensity is defined as actual dose/scheduled dose. Bortezomib is administered on Days 1, 4, 15, and 18 every 28 days. (NCT00366106)
Timeframe: Each dose of bortezomib (days 1, 4, 15, and 18 every 28 days)

InterventionRelative dose intensity (Mean)
Cycle 1 / Week 1Cycle 1 / Week 1 Day 4Cycle 1 / Week 3Cycle 1 / Week 3 Day 18Cycle 2 / Week 5Cycle 2 / Week 5 Day 4Cycle 2 / Week 7Cycle 2 / Week 7 Day 18Cycle 3 / Week 9Cycle 3 / Week 9 Day 4Cycle 3 / Week 11Cycle 3 / Week 11 Day 18Cycle 4 / Week 13Cycle 4 / Week 13 Day 4Cycle 4 / Week 15Cycle 4 / Week 15 Day 18Cycle 5 / Week 17Cycle 5 / Week 17 Day 4Cycle 5 / Week 19Cycle 5 / Week 19 Day 18Cycle 6 / Week 21Cycle 6 / Week 21 Day 4Cycle 6 / Week 23Cycle 6 / Week 23 Day 18Cycle 7 / Week 25Cycle 7 / Week 25 Day 4Cycle 7 / Week 27Cycle 7 / Week 27 Day 18Cycle 8 / Week 29Cycle 8 / Week 29 Day 4Cycle 8 / Week 31Cycle 8 / Week 31 Day 18Cycle 9 / Week 33Cycle 9 / Week 33 Day 4Cycle 9 / Week 35Cycle 10 / Week 37Cycle 10 / Week 37 Day 4Cycle 10 / Week 39Cycle 10 / Week 39 Day 18Cycle 11 / Week 41Cycle 11 / Week 41 Day 4Cycle 11 / Week 43Cycle 11 / Week 43 Day 18
Treatment Group0.970.980.970.970.950.960.950.960.990.970.970.950.990.960.990.960.980.961.000.971.010.981.010.991.111.031.081.031.050.991.051.041.100.751.151.221.001.221.001.221.001.441.00

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

(NCT00366106)
Timeframe: TTP was measured from day 1 of treatment until time of progression, assessed up to 40 months

InterventionMonths (Mean)
Treatment Group23.07

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Response

Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), and Minor Response (MR) each required stable bone disease and normal calcium levels. CR also required 100% serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) reduction, negative immunofixation (IF), 100% urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP)reduction, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PR also required >=50% SPEP reduction, >=90% UPEP reduction, and >=50% reduction in plasma cells in bone marrow. MR also required >=25% SPEP reduction, >=50% UPEP reduction, and > 25% reduction in plasma cells. (NCT00366106)
Timeframe: Every 8 weeks from start of treatment until end of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Treatment GroupNA

[back to top]

Incidence of Treatment-emergent Peripheral Neuropathy

(NCT00366106)
Timeframe: Every 4 weeks from start of treatment until end of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Treatment Group11

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) by Day 100.

(NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by day 100 after peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I and Phase II22

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (Chronic GVHD).

Number of participants with chronic GVHD at 1 year post transplant. (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by 1 year after PBSC infusion

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I and Phase II29

[back to top]

Successful Initial Engraftment by Day 45 Post Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Infusion and Administration of Bortezomib (Velcade), Tacrolimus and Methotrexate

Percentage of participants who did not experience failure to engraft or relapse or death before assessment. (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by day 45 post PBSC infusion

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combined Phase I Plus Phase II97

[back to top]

Sustained Engraftment Following Transplant.

As measured by median total donor chimerism at day 100. (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by day 100 post transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I and Phase II97

[back to top]

The Maximally Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bortezomib (Velcade) That Can be Administered With Tacrolimus and Methotrexate After Mismatched Allogeneic Non-myeloablative Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Transplantation

"The MTD of bortezomib was evaluated at 3 dose levels:~Dose level 1: 1.0 mg/m^2 Dose level 2: 1.3 mg/m^2 Dose level 3: 1.5 mg/m^2 Cohorts of 3-5 pts were enrolled at each dose level. At any dose level, if no DLT in the first 3, 4, or 5 pts, then dose escalation would occur.~If 3 evaluable pts in cohort, and 1 of 3 experiences DLT then 2 additional pts treated at the same dose level. If >=1 of 2 additional pts experience DLT then previous dose level will be MTD. If no DLT in additional 2 pts then dose escalation will occur. If 4 evaluable pts in cohort, and 1 of the 4 experiences DLT then 1 additional pt treated at same dose level. If this additional pt experiences DLT then the previous dose will be declared to be the MTD. If additional pt does not experience DLT, then dose escalation will take place. If 5 evaluable pts in cohort, and 1 experiences DLT, then dose escalation will take place. If >=2 of first 3, 4, or 5 pts experience DLT then the previous dose will be declared MTD." (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by day 45 post PBSC infusion

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase I1.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival.

Progression is defined as disease relapse or disease progression since transplant. (NCT00369226)
Timeframe: by 1 year after PBSC infusion

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)60
Overall Survival (OS)76

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival (OS) will be measured from the time of first treatment to death from any cause. (NCT00369707)
Timeframe: Median follow up for all patients was 50 months (range 12-78 months) and on intent to treat, OS rate for all patients is reported at 4 years.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Bortezomib and Rituximab87

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Experience Adverse Events With Bortezomib/Rituximab Combination Treatment

"Assess the safety and tolerance of bortezomib/rituximab as induction and maintenance therapy. Data will be collected for grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events experienced by patients that are determined to be at least possibly related to at least one study drug. Toxicity data for bortezomib/rituximab will be collected on day 1 of every cycle (1 cycle = 35 days) for up to 7 cycles during treatment according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria for adverse events version 3.0 (CTCAE v3.0). In general adverse events (AEs) will be graded according to the following:~Grade 1 Mild AE Grade 2 Moderate AE Grade 3 Severe AE Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 Death related to AE" (NCT00369707)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle and at the completion of cycles 1 and 3, during treatment up to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeutropeniaFeverInfectionInfusion reaction (rituximab)CardiacFatigueThrobocytopeniaDiarrheaHypokalemiaBowel obstructionDehydration
Bortezomib and Rituximab22222211111

[back to top]

Correlation of Tumor Burden

"Correlation of tumor burden according to Groupe D'Etude des Lymphomes Follicularies (GELF) with recently developed Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) prognostic index. All patients enrolled in the study were required to have high tumor burden (HTB) as defined by GELF, where HTB is defined as representing higher risk disease and poorer outcomes than low tumor burden (LTB). Patients were put into low risk or high risk FLIPI groups. Low risk group with a score of 0-2 and high risk group with a score of 3-5.~A FLIPI score of 0 to 1 = low risk with a 10 year overall survival of 70%. A score of 2= intermediate risk with a 10 year overall survival of 50%. Finally, a score of ≥ 3 is considered high risk with a 10 year overall survival of 35%. Data was collected in connection with high or low risk FLIPI and Progression Free Survival (PFS) or Overall Survival (OS) and is reported as percentage patient with high/low risk that are progression free or alive." (NCT00369707)
Timeframe: At the start of treatment and at Median follow up for all patients was 50 months (range 12-78 months) and on intent to treat, PFS and OS for all patients is reported at 4 years.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
4 year PFS high risk FLIPI4 year PFS low risk FLIPI4 year OS high risk FLIPI4 year OS low risk FLIPI
Bortezomib and Rituximab26608192

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate

"Progression Free Survival is measured from the time of first induction infusion to disease progression, relapse, second tumor, or death from any cause.~Progressive disease (PD) requires the following:~Appearance of any new lesion or increase by > 50% in the size of previously involved sites.~Increase of > 50% in the SPD from nadir measurement of all involved dominant lymph nodes and liver nodules and spleen nodules or unequivocal progression in any non measurable disease or nondominant site.~> 50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node greater than 1 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node" (NCT00369707)
Timeframe: Median follow up for all patients was 50 months (range 12-78 months) and on intent to treat, PFS for all patients is reported at 4 years.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Bortezomib and Rituximab44

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Treatment Failure

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) rate measured, from the time of first treatment to disease progression, relapse, second tumor, death from any cause, treatment toxicity requiring termination from the study, or for any reason treatment is discontinued permanently. (NCT00369707)
Timeframe: Median follow up for all patients was 50 months and on intent to treat, TTF rate for all patients is reported at 4 years.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Bortezomib and Rituximab26

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate After Completion of Maintenance Therapy

"Overall response rate at completion of bortezomib/rituximab maintenance therapy.~Overall response rate at this time point will be defined as complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) after 3 cycles of bortezomib/rituximab induction therapy and up to 4 cycles of maintenance for patients with previously untreated low-grade, B-cell NHL.~Complete response requires complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, and normalization of those biochemical abnormalities (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) definitely assignable to NHL. There must also be complete disappearance of lymphoma involvement in the bone marrow (if initially present).~Partial response (PR) requires 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses and no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen." (NCT00369707)
Timeframe: At baseline and every 2 months during treatment of up to 3 cycles of induction (1 cycle =35days) and 4 cycles of maintenance (1 cycle =2 months) for up to 12 months.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Bortezomib and Rituximab71

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate After 1 Course of Induction Therapy

"Overall response rate (ORR) after 1 cycle of bortezomib/rituximab induction therapy.~Overall response rate at this time point will be defined as complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) after 1 cycle of bortezomib/rituximab induction therapy for patients with previously untreated low-grade, B-cell NHL.~Complete response requires complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, and normalization of those biochemical abnormalities (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) definitely assignable to NHL. There must also be complete disappearance of lymphoma involvement in the bone marrow (if initially present).~Partial response (PR) requires 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses and no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen." (NCT00369707)
Timeframe: At baseline and at the completion of cycle 1 (1 cycle =35 days)

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Bortezomib and Rituximab33

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (Complete Response and Partial Response) After Three Inductions Cycles of Treatment.

"The primary objective of this study is to assess the overall response rate. Overall response rate at this time point will be defined as complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) after 3 cycles of bortezomib/rituximab induction therapy for patients with previously untreated low-grade, B-cell NHL.~Complete response requires complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present before therapy, and normalization of those biochemical abnormalities (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) definitely assignable to NHL. There must also be complete disappearance of lymphoma involvement in the bone marrow (if initially present).~Partial response (PR) requires 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses and no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver, or spleen." (NCT00369707)
Timeframe: At baseline and at the completion of 3 cycles of treatment where 1 cycle equals 35 days.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Bortezomib and Rituximab71

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Tolerability of Bortezomib Combined With Y-90-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Determined by Number of Dose Limiting Toxicities in a Cohort.

"To determine the MTD using a 3+3 dose escalating design. There will be 3 dose cohorts:1.0mg/m2,1.3mg/m2 and1.6 mg/m2. 3 patients will be enrolled at dose of 1.0mg/m2 bortezomib. If no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) are seen in the first 3 patients then dose will be escalated to next level and 3 patients will be treated at that dose level. If a DLT is seen at any dose, then 3 more patients will be enrolled at that dose level. If 1 patient out of 6, experience a DLT then MTD will be determined to be at this dose level. If 2 or more DLTs are seen in first 3 patients at that dose, then MTD will be one dose lower to the level where the DLTs were experienced.~DLTs were defined using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Version 3.0.~DLTs=grade 3 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or ileus more than 96h; grade 4 nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or ileus,neuropathic pain, peripheral sensory neuropathy, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia." (NCT00372905)
Timeframe: During induction therapy, the first 28 days of treatment.

InterventionDLT (Number)
Cohort 1: 1.0mg/m2 Bortezomib0
Cohort 2: 1.3mg/m2 Bortezomib0
Cohort 3: 1.6mg/m2 Bortezomib2

[back to top]

Median Progression Free Survival

"Median progression free survival (PFS) will be assessed by CT scans after induction therapy, consolidation therapy, every 3 months for the first year following treatment and every 6 months for the second year.~Progressive disease is defined as the appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size or at least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis." (NCT00372905)
Timeframe: At start of treatment, at completion of induction therapy, at completion of consolidation therapy, every 3 months for 1 year, and every 6 months for 1 year

InterventionMonths (Median)
Cohort 1+ Cohort 2+ Cohort 36.5

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"The overall response rate at the completion of treatment was defined as complete response plus partial response.~Complete response (CR)=A post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted as long as it is PET-negative and normalization of those biochemical abnormalities.~Partial response (PR)=50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase in the size of the other nodes, liver or spleen, and no new sites of disease.~Stable disease=Failing to attain the criteria for PR or CR, but not fulfilling those for progressive disease.~Progressive disease(PD)=At least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses, or in a single involved node or extranodal mass, or the size of other lesions. Appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even if other lesions are decreasing in size." (NCT00372905)
Timeframe: At baseline, after induction cycle (1 cycle =28 days) and consolidation therapy of a maximum of 3 cycles (1cycle =28 days), up to approximately 6 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Cohort 1+ Cohort 2+ Cohort 389

[back to top] [back to top]

Response Rate in Patients Treated With Rituximab-CHOPbortezomib Induction Therapy (R-CHOP-V) Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy(VM).

Complete Response(CR) is a complete disappearance of all disease with the exception of nodes. No new lesions. previously enlarged organs must have regressed and not be palpable. Bone marrow(BM) must be negative if positive at baseline. Normalization of markers. CR Unconfirmed (CRU) does not qualify for CR above, due to a residual nodal mass or an indeterminate BM. Partial Response(PR) is a 50% decrease in the sum of products of greatest diameters (SPD) for up to 6 identified dominant lesions, including spleenic and hepatic nodules from baseline. No new lesions and no increase in the size of liver, spleen or other nodes. (NCT00376961)
Timeframe: At the time of restaging (between Cycles 6 and 7), every 6 months during Cycles 7-14, and at the end of protocol treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseUnconfirmed Complete ResponseUnconfirmed Partial ResponseNo ResponseAssessment Inadequate
R-CHOP-V Followed by VM1716131414

[back to top]

2-year Progression-free Survival in Patients Treated With Rituximab-CHOP-bortezomib Induction Therapy (RCHOP-V) Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy (VM)

Measured from date of registration to date of first observation of relapsed or progressive disease, or death due to any cause. (NCT00376961)
Timeframe: 0-2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
R-CHOP-V Followed by VM62

[back to top] [back to top]

2-year Overall Survival in Patients Treated With Rituximab-CHOP-bortezomib Induction Therapy (RCHOP-V) Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy (VM)

Measured from date of registration to date of death due to any cause or last contact (NCT00376961)
Timeframe: 0-2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
R-CHOP-V Followed by VM85

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate of the Drug Combination in This Patient Populations.

Overall Response (OR) was defined as partial response (PR) or better. Response was assessed according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant criteria, modified to include nCR and VGPR, from the International Uniform Response Criteria. (NCT00378105)
Timeframe: Full response assessment was conducted at the end of cycle 8 (average of168 days) and after cycle 4 (84 days) for patients proceeding to transplant.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 1 Population100
Phase II Population100
Total100

[back to top]

Estimated 18-month Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate

"PD from European Bone Marrow Transplant (EBMT) Response Criteria Required one or more:~>25% increased in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 5 g/L and confirmed on a repeat investigation, or >25% increased in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion (must also be an absolute increase of at least 200 mg/24 h and confirmed on a repeat investigation), or >25% increased in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or biopsy (must also be an absolute increase of at least 10%) Definite increase in the size of existing lytic bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas.~Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas (not including compression fracture).~Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause).~PFS was measured from treatment initiation to progression or death, censored at the date patients were last known to be alive and disease free" (NCT00378105)
Timeframe: PFS rate at 18 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
All Patients75

[back to top]

Estimated 18-month Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival was measured from treatment initiation to death, censored at the date patients were last known to be alive for those who had not died. (NCT00378105)
Timeframe: Survival rate at 18 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
All Patients97

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Remained in Response for More Than 18 Months

Duration of response was measured from first response to progression or death, censored at the date patients were last known to be alive and disease free for patients who had not progressed or died. (NCT00378105)
Timeframe: Response rate at 18 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
All Patients68

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response will be measured as the time from initiation of a response to first documentation of disease progression or death, or date last known progression-free and alive for those who have not progressed or died. (NCT00378209)
Timeframe: Assessed at a median follow-up of 44 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Bortezomib Combination8.7

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

"Response assessed by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant (EBMT) criteria, modified to include nCR and VGPR from the international uniform response criteria (IMWG).~Objective response was defined by the achievement of at least Partial Response (PR) or better (CR-complete response, nCR-near complete response, and VGPR-very good partial response)." (NCT00378209)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle for up to 8 cycles and best response was reported

Interventionpercentage of treated patients (Number)
Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Bortezomib Combination64

[back to top]

Overall Survival

defined as time from treatment initiation to death, or last known to be alive for those who had not died (NCT00378209)
Timeframe: assesed at a median follow-up of 44 months

Interventionmonth (Median)
Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Bortezomib Combination30

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration to the disease progression or death from any cause, censored at date last known progression-free for those who have not progressed or died. (NCT00378209)
Timeframe: aassesed at a median follow-up of 44 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Bortezomib Combination9.5

[back to top]

The Proportion of Patients Alive and Without Progressive Disease (PD) for ≥6 Months

"Response assessed by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant (EBMT) criteria, modified to include nCR and VGPR from the international uniform response criteria (IMWG).~Progressive disease (PD) required one or more of the following:~>25% increased in serum monoclonal paraprotein (must also be an absolute increase of at least 5 g/L and confirmed on a repeat investigation) >25% increased in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion (must also be an absolute increase of at least 200 mg/24 h and confirmed on a repeat investigation) >25% increased in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy (must also be an absolute increase of at least 10%) Definite increase in the size of existing lytic bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas.~Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas (not including compression fracture).~Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause)." (NCT00378209)
Timeframe: 6 months after therapy

Interventionpercentage of treated patients (Number)
Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Bortezomib Combination75

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced Adverse Events

(NCT00379574)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib + CHOP Every 2 Weeks49

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Achieved Complete Response

All patients,9 patients of phase I study and 40 patietns in phase II stuay, were assessed with International Working Group response criteria assessed by CT; Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and diappearance of all disease-related symptoms. (NCT00379574)
Timeframe: 14 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib + CHOP Every 2 Weeks32

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR)

CR is defined as at least 80% reduction in the sum of the products of the perpendicular diameters of each of the nodal masses or return to normal size, along with negative nuclear medicine imaging. (NCT00381940)
Timeframe: After 2 cycles of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
With CRWithout CR
Treatment (Ifosfamide, Vinorelbine, Bortezomib)221

[back to top]

Induction Success Rate

Induction success is defined as achieving CR or PR without a targeted primary toxicity. Primary toxicity includes toxic death (which is any death predominantly attributable to treatment-related toxicities or complications, occurring during or within one month of the completion of therapy), Non-hematologic grades 3 or 4 toxicities attributable to drug (with the specific exclusion of 1) Grade 3 or 4 nausea or vomiting, 2) grade 3 transaminases (AST/ALT) elevations which return to < grade 1 prior to the time of the next treatment course, 3) grade 3 or 4 fever or infection, and 4) Grade 3 mucositis.) and Hematologic toxicity (Delay of >2 weeks in the start of re-induction cycle 2 or in hematologic recovery after cycle 2 secondary to severe myelosuppression, infection, or sepsis.) (NCT00381940)
Timeframe: After 2 cycles and 4 cycles

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Induction Success Rate (After 2 cycles)Induction Success Rate (After 4 cycles)
Treatment (Ifosfamide, Vinorelbine, Bortezomib)1912

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT00381940)
Timeframe: After 2 cycles and 4 cycles

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Overall Response Rate (After 2 cycles)Overall Response Rate (After 4 cycles)
Treatment (Ifosfamide, Vinorelbine, Bortezomib)1912

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Toxicity

Grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicity during protocol therapy. The number of patients that experience CTC Version 4 grade 3 or higher non-hematologic at any time during protocol therapy (NCT00381940)
Timeframe: 4 weeks following completion of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ifosfamide, Vinorelbine, Bortezomib)9

[back to top]

Rate of Successful PBSC Harvest

Success is defined as the ability to harvest 2x10^6 CD34+ cells/kg within 5 collection days. (NCT00381940)
Timeframe: After 2 cycles

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Ifosfamide, Vinorelbine, Bortezomib)19

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bortezomib in Combination With Pemetrexel (Phase I)

(NCT00389805)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

InterventionMg/m^2 (Number)
Arm A1.3
Arm B1.6

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade ≥ 3 Toxicity (Phase I)

Grade 3/4 toxicity occurring in a patient within 1 cycle. (NCT00389805)
Timeframe: First cycle of treatment (3 weeks)

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NeutropeniaAnemiaThrombocytopeniaIncreased transaminasesFatigue
Arm A121012
Arm B10100

[back to top]

Number of Patients Experiencing a Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I)

Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or grade 3 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding, requirement for transfusion or lasting >7 days; febrile neutropenia; grade 3 neutropenia associated with infection; any other grade >/=3 non-hematologic toxicity considered by the investigator to be related to study drug. (NCT00389805)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A3
Arm B0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experience Adverse Events (Phase I)

Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v3.0 (Phase I). (NCT00389805)
Timeframe: Throughout the entire study (up to 36 months).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A15
Arm B12

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Toxicity by NCI CTC v3.0 (Phase I)

Adverse events possibly related to treatment, graded according to the NCI CTCAE v3.0. (NCT00389805)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
NeutropeniaAnemiaThrombocytopeniaIncreased transaminasesAnorexiaConstipationCoughDehydrationDiarrheaDizzinessEdemaFatigueFeverInfectionNausea +/- vomitingNeuropathyRashRenal impairmentWeakness
Arm A12101245542541536104650
Arm B10156341344113466512

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; lifethreatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. (NCT00401843)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Adverse Events (AEs)Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Part 1 - Bortezomib + Siltuximab2110
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Placebo13844
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Siltuximab14047

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival was defined as the time interval between randomization and the first documented sign of disease progression (including relapse from complete response [CR]) by the European Bone Marrow Transplant (EBMT) criteria or death, whichever occurred first. Relapse from CR requires at least 1 of the following: Reappearance of serum or urinary M-protein on immunofixation or routine electrophoresis, confirmed by at least 1 further investigation and excluding oligoclonal immune reconstitution; Greater than or equal to (>=) 5 percent (%) plasma cells either in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine bone biopsy; Development of new lytic bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of residual bone lesions (development of a compression fracture does not exclude continued response and may not indicate progression); Development of hypercalcemia not attributable to any other cause. (NCT00401843)
Timeframe: Randomization until disease progression or death, which ever occured first (maximum up to 5 years)

Interventiondays (Median)
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Placebo232
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Siltuximab245

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Complete Response (CR Rate)

CR rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a confirmed CR before dexamethasone was added. CR: Absence of original M-protein in serum/urine by immunofixation,maintained for minimum of 6 weeks. The presence of oligoclonal bands consistent with oligoclonal immune reconstitution does not exclude CR; Less than 5 percent (%) plasma cells in bone marrow aspirate and also on trephine bone biopsy if biopsy is performed; No increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions; Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT00401843)
Timeframe: Randomization until disease progression (maximum up to 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Placebo7.3
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Siltuximab10.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Confirmed Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) (Overall Response Rate)

Overall response rate was defined as best response (CR/PR confirmed) for a participant recorded from first administration of study agent or randomization (Part 2) until disease progression/recurrence and before dexamethasone was added. CR: Absence of original M-protein in serum/urine by immunofixation,maintained for minimum of 6 weeks. The presence of oligoclonal bands consistent with oligoclonal immune reconstitution does not exclude CR; Less than 5 percent (%) plasma cells in bone marrow aspirate and also on trephine bone biopsy if biopsy is performed; No increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions; Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas. PR: Greater than or equal to (>=) 50% reduction in level of serum M-protein, maintained for minimum of 6 weeks. Reduction in 24 hour urinary light chain excretion either by >= 90% or to < 200 mg, maintained for minimum of 6 weeks; >= 50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas; No increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions. (NCT00401843)
Timeframe: Randomization until disease progression (maximum up to 5 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Placebo46.7
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Siltuximab55.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the interval between the first administration of study agent or randomization (Part 2) and the participant's death from any cause. For participants with unknown survival status as of the data cut-off date, overall survival was censored at the last date known to be alive. (NCT00401843)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Placebo1121
Part 2 - Bortezomib + Siltuximab937

[back to top]

Response to Bortezomib (VELCADE®)

"Response is the primary endpoint of this study and will be scored on day 21 (3 weeks after the first dose of VELCADE) and every 3 weeks subsequently. Patients who progress or expire before the end of the study will be considered non-responders.~Patients are evaluated for response in an organ if they have AGVHD in that organ at the start of treatment with VELCADE or if AGVHD develops after the start of VELCADE, but before the time period of evaluation. Complete response in an organ is defined as no evidence clinical or biochemical signs of AGVHD. For the overall assessment, it is defined as complete resolution of rash, abnormal LFTs, and absence of diarrhea attributed to AGVHD.~Partial response is defined as a one stage decrease in any organ system without worsening in other organ systems." (NCT00408928)
Timeframe: Through 30 days post-treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete responsePartial responseNo response
Bortezomib for Treatment of GHVD224

[back to top] [back to top]

Complete Response Rate to 1.3mg/m^2 of Bortezomib With Mitoxantrone and Etoposide in Phase II

"Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions.~The percentage of participants that experienced complete response will be reported." (NCT00410423)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2 - Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^227

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity in Phase I

Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as grade-3 toxicity definitely related to bortezomib or grade-4 toxicity probably or definitely related to bortezomib. (NCT00410423)
Timeframe: 30-90 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1 - Bortezomib 0.7mg/m^20
Phase 1 - Bortezomib 1.0 mg/m^20
Phase 1 - Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^20

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The study was closed prematurely due to slow accrual. When the study closed only two patients had died, making the OS 83%. (NCT00413959)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade, Rituximab,Cyclophosphamide & Decadron83

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate Using This Regimen in Patients With Low-grade B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Percentage of complete responders plus percentage of partial responders equals overall response rate. (NCT00413959)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Velcade, Rituximab,Cyclophosphamide & Decadron90

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months

Overall survival (OS) at 6 months with the combination of bortezomib and carboplatin in participants who previously received 1 prior regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer from date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 6 months. Rate equals number of participants living at 6 months following treatment divided by the total number of participants. (NCT00416793)
Timeframe: up to 6 months

InterventionProportion of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + Carboplatin0

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Overall Response Rate measured by number of patients per the total treatment population who partially or completely responded to treatment. Participants reevaluated for response every 6 weeks. In addition to a baseline scan, confirmatory scans at 4 weeks following initial documentation of objective response. (NCT00416793)
Timeframe: from assignment of treatment until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 17 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib + Carboplatin0

[back to top]

Duration of Response in Patients With WM

Time from documentation of first response to progressive disease. (NCT00422799)
Timeframe: 5 Years

Interventionyears (Median)
Bortezomib and Rituximab1.4

[back to top]

Time to Progression in Patients With WM

Time to progresion is the defined as the time from study entry to disease progression (PD) or death. Patients without PD are censored at the date of last disease evaluation. PD is defined as a greater than 25% increase in serum monoclonal IgM electrophoresis confirmed by a second measurement at least 2 weeks apart, or progression of clinically significant findings due to disease or symptoms attributable to WM. (NCT00422799)
Timeframe: 5 Years

Interventionyears (Median)
Bortezomib and Rituximab1.6

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate of Bortezomib and Rituximab (VR) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM)

Overall Response Rate= Minor response (>25%-50% reduction in monoclonal IgM from baseline + Partial Response (>50-90% reduction in monoclonal IgM from baseline)+ Complete Response (Disappearance of monoclonal protein by immunofixation; no histologic evidence of bone marrow involvement, resolution of any adenopathy/organomegaly (confirmed by CT scan), or signs or symptoms attributable to WM. Reconfirmation of the CR status is required at least 6 weeks apart with a second immunofixation.) (NCT00422799)
Timeframe: 2 Years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib and Rituximab30

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate of Bortezomib and Rituximab (VR) in Patients With Previously Untreated Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM)

Overall Response Rate= Minor response (>25%-50% reduction in monoclonal IgM from baseline + Partial Response (>50-90% reduction in monoclonal IgM from baseline)+ Complete Response (Disappearance of monoclonal protein by immunofixation; no histologic evidence of bone marrow involvement, resolution of any adenopathy/organomegaly (confirmed by CT scan), or signs or symptoms attributable to WM. Reconfirmation of the CR status is required at least 6 weeks apart with a second immunofixation.) (NCT00422799)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib and Rituximab23

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Require Dose Delay/Reduction in Dose of Bortezomibin the First Cycle

Dose limiting toxicity at Level 1,2 and 3: Number of subjects who required dose delay/reduction in dose of bortezomib in the first cycle of treatment. DLT defined by any of the following during first cycle: (1) GR4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, (2) Greater than GR3 non-hematological toxicity except alopecia or inadequately treated nausea or vomiting or (3) neurosensory toxicity of GR2 with pain or any neurotoxicity greater than GR2. (NCT00424840)
Timeframe: up to 21 days for each dosing cycle

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I: Dose Level 10
Phase 1 Dose Level II:0
Phase I Dose Level III0

[back to top]

The Purpose of the Present Study is to Assess the Safety of PS-341 as a Pretreatment in Patients Who Are to Undergo a Radical Prostatectomy. Poor Wound Healing and Excessive Bleeding, With Historical Rates of <1% and 10% Respectively Will be Measured.

Pour wound healing is defined in the protocol as dehiscence of fascia during the first postoperative week. Excessive bleeding is defined in the protocol as greater than 2 units of blood required during the first 24 hours after surgery. (NCT00425503)
Timeframe: Poor wound healing (dehiscence of fascia during the first postoperative week) and bleeding 24 hours after surgery

InterventionEvents (Number)
Poor wound healingExcessive bleeding
PS-34100

[back to top]

Patient Response to Treatment

Progressive disease (PD): >=20% increase in sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesion(s), taking as reference smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started. Complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response (PR): >=30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesion(s), taking as reference baseline sum LD. Stable disease (SD): neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD. (NCT00425750)
Timeframe: 7.55 months (average duration, on study to off study)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial ResponseProgressive DiseaseStable DiseaseNot Evaluable
Bortezomib; Docetaxel110104

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Median duration of survival without disease progression, calculated as on-study date to date of progression or date of death (censored) or off-study date (censored) (NCT00425750)
Timeframe: 7.55 months (average duration, on study to off study)

InterventionMonth (Median)
Bortezomib; Docetaxel2.27

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Median survival time of patients, calculated as on-study date to date of death or off-study date (censored) (NCT00425750)
Timeframe: 7.55 months (average duration, on study to off study)

InterventionMonth (Median)
Bortezomib; Docetaxel5.13

[back to top]

Optimal Bendamustine Dosage for Further Studies

(NCT00426855)
Timeframe: Three weeks after treatment termination

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Group 160

[back to top]

3-year Overall Survival (OS)

OS for patients who received maintenance rituximab or ASCT after VcR-CVAD induction is defined as time from start of maintenance rituximab or ASCT to death. Patients alive at last follow-up were censored. (NCT00433537)
Timeframe: Assessed every 6 months for 5 years, and then yearly thereafter.

Interventionprobability (Number)
VcR-CVAD Induction Followed by Maintenance Rituximab0.91
VcR-CVAD Induction Followed by ASCT0.96

[back to top]

2-year Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS for patients who received maintenance rituximab or ASCT after VcR-CVAD induction is defined as time from start of maintenance rituximab or ASCT to earlier of disease progression or death. Patients alive and progression-free at last follow-up were censored. (NCT00433537)
Timeframe: Assessed every 6 months for 5 years, and then yearly thereafter.

Interventionprobability (Number)
VcR-CVAD Induction Followed by Maintenance Rituximab0.79
VcR-CVAD Induction Followed by ASCT0.76

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate

Number of eligible, treated participants who achieve complete response. Response criteria are based upon the criteria from the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al., 2007). Complete response is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease, and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy. (NCT00433537)
Timeframe: Assessed after VcR-CVAD cycles 2, 4, and 6.

Interventionproportion (Number)
VcR-CVAD Induction0.68

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

To determine the maximum tolerated dose(MTD) of velcade and dose limiting toxicity(DLT). A dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as a grade 3-4 neurological toxicity, graft failure, or death due to GvHD. The Commom Terminlogy Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 was used. (NCT00439556)
Timeframe: From start of treatment to 90 days after the start of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, Transplant, Filgrastim, Tacrolimus)0
Velcade Dose Level 20
Velcade Dose Level 30

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

To determine DFS at 1 year post transplant. (NCT00439556)
Timeframe: At 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Velcade Dose Level 116
Velcade Dose Level 20
Velcade Dose Level 30

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the duration from the date of the best confirmed response for subjects who achieved CR or PR to the date of first documented evidence of PD (or relapse for subjects who experienced CR) over the duration of the study. DOR = ([Date of PD or date of censoring - Date of best response]+1)/30.44. (NCT00441168)
Timeframe: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles

,
Interventionmonths (Number)
patient 1patient 2patient 3patient 4patient 5patient 6
PAD Treatment2.837.695.526.574.967.42
VAD Treatment1.686.183.715.424.73NA

[back to top]

Best Confirmed Disease Response

The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria as assessed by the investigator. The best confirmed response was defined as 2 separate and consecutive evaluations of response, at least 6 weeks apart (for progressive disease [PD], 1 to 3 weeks apart). The ordering of the responses was: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), no change (NC) and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD. (NCT00441168)
Timeframe: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPRResponse Rate (CR + PR)MROverall Response (CR + PR + MR)NCPDUnknown/Unable to Assess
PAD Treatment16707114
VAD Treatment05527314

[back to top]

Best Reported Disease Response

The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the EBMT criteria as assessed by the investigator. The ordering of the responses was: CR, PR, MR, NC and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD. (NCT00441168)
Timeframe: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPRResponse Rate (CR + PR)MROverall Response (CR + PR + MR)NCPDUnknown/Unable to Assess
PAD Treatment347310300
VAD Treatment16729501

[back to top]

Disease Response

The response of myeloma to BDDTD will be assessed by standard electrophoretic and immunofixation tests of blood and urine for a monoclonal protein (M protein), and bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. These tests will be performed at enrollment and at the conclusion of therapy. (NCT00458705)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponseNear Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgression of DiseaseVery Good Partial Response
Combination Therapy10810237

[back to top]

Hematologic and Organ Response

patients will be assessed for hematologic response (the response of the clonal plasma cell disease). If the plasma cell disease persists, then they will receive 6 cycles of adjuvant therapy with bortezomib and dexamethasone; patients with peripheral neuropathy will receive dexamethasone alone because of the risk of neuropathy associated with bortezomib. Symptomatic organ involvement with amyloid as defined below. Patients must have symptomatic involvement of no more than 2 of the following 4 visceral organ-systems: kidneys, liver/GI, peripheral/autonomic nervous system, and heart. (NCT00458822)
Timeframe: 2-3 months post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Hematologic ResponsePartial ResponseStable Disease
All Patients11718

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) - Number of Participants Alive at Study Completion

The secondary objective of this study is to assess the safely and tolerability of the combination treatment of bevacizumnab and bortezomnib. Adjustments in the dosing schedule of bortezomib would be made for patients with adequate response as per Blade criteria and continue until disease progression or 18 months (NCT00464178)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomilb and Bevacizumab5

[back to top]

Median Number of Cycles to Tumor Progression (TTP)

Study Schema: Bortezomib will be administered on Days 1. 4, 8, and 11. Response will be assessed subsequent to each 21-day cycle. Progression is defined using the Bladé criteria, defined progression as an increase of >25% in paraprotein or urinary light chain excretion (or marrow plasma cell percentage in the marrow (NCT00464178)
Timeframe: 18 months

InterventionCycles Prior to Tumor Progression (Median)
Bortezomib and Bevacizumab1.5

[back to top]

Number of Patients Reaching Complete Response (CR)

Number of participants with CR at Day 180 who had maintained CR for at minimum of 4 weeks, and who had: No monoclonal protein in urine/serum when analyzed by immunofixation electrophoresis; bone marrow normal by morphological examination with <5% plasma cells, <1% aneuploid light chain restricted population by flow cytometry for DNA/cIg; and, while healing of bony lesion is not required, no new lytic lesion should appear. Further compression fracture of spine not considered progressive disease. (NCT00469209)
Timeframe: Baseline through Day 180, with assessments at Day 90 and Day 180

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No Bortezomib4
Bortezomib 1.0 mg/m^21
Bortezomib 1.5 mg/m^24

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)

Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), v3.0. All serious adverse events are listed in the Adverse Event Reporting section. (NCT00473590)
Timeframe: Participants were monitored for AEs from initiation of treatment to 30 days after treatment termination (up to 122 weeks).

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Arterial thromboembolic events (any grade)Bleeding other than pulmonary or CNS (Grade >=3)Febrile neutropenia (any grade)Gastrointestinal Perforation (Any Grade)Hypertension (Grade >= 3)Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (Grade >= 3)Neutropenia (Grade >= 3)Osteonecrosis of the JawPeripheral Neuropathy (Grade >= 3)Pulmonary and CNS Bleeding (Any Grade)Thrombocytopenia (Grade >= 3)Vernous Thromboembolic Events (Grade >=3)
BORT + BV12108010181150
BORT + P0111016070151

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death on study from any cause within 30 days of the last response assessment. Disease progression was determined by the investigator using the International Myeloma Working Group's (IMWG) uniform response criteria. Median PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. For patients who were alive at the time of the analysis and whose disease had not yet progressed, PFS was censored at the time of the last response assessment. (NCT00473590)
Timeframe: From randomization to disease progression or death on study (up to 116 weeks).

Interventionmonths (Median)
BORT + P5.1
BORT + BV6.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response

Overall response was defined as a stringent complete response, complete response, very good partial response, or partial response (sCR, CR, VGPR, and PR) determined on two consecutive assessments ≤ 6 weeks apart and before the initiation of any new anti-tumor therapy, as assessed by the investigator using the IMWG's uniform response criteria. Patients without a post-baseline response assessment or who died prior to their first scheduled response assessment were considered non-responders. (NCT00473590)
Timeframe: From randomization to the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
BORT + P43.4
BORT + BV51.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the duration of time from randomization until death from any cause. All deaths were included, whether they occurred on study treatment or following treatment discontinuation. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. For patients who had not died, overall survival was censored at the date that the patient was last known to be alive. (NCT00473590)
Timeframe: From randomization until death from any cause, up until the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).

InterventionMonths (Median)
BORT + P24.0
BORT + BVNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Overall Response

Overall response was defined as a stringent complete response, complete response, very good partial response, or partial response (sCR, CR, VGPR, and PR, respectively) determined on two consecutive assessments ≤ 6 weeks apart and before the initiation of any new anti-tumor therapy, as assessed by the investigator using the International Myeloma Working Group's (IMWG's) uniform response criteria. Patients without a post-baseline response assessment or who died prior to their first scheduled response assessment were considered non-responders. (NCT00473590)
Timeframe: From randomization to the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).

Interventionparticipants (Number)
BORT + P23
BORT + BV25

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response was defined as the time from the initial response to disease progression or death on study. Disease progression was determined by the investigator using the IMWG's uniform response criteria and defined as an increase of ≥25% from best response in: Serum M-protein and/or Urine M-protein and/or Marrow plasma cells; or new or increased plasmacytomas or bone lesions; or hypercalcemia due to myeloma. Duration of response was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. For patients who had not progressed or died, duration of response was censored at the date of the last response assessment. (NCT00473590)
Timeframe: From randomization to the end of study (clinical cut-off; up to 116 weeks).

InterventionMonths (Median)
BORT + P6.0
BORT + BV6.9

[back to top]

Time to Failure (Phase II)

Failure will be defined as recurrence/progression of disease or death from either disease or toxicity. Bayesian toxicity monitoring schema will be used to monitor severe toxicity profile in combined therapy. Severe toxicity is defined as at least two episodes of neutropenic fever during treatment courses. (NCT00477412)
Timeframe: First date of diagnosis up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II- Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)55

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is the time in number of months from start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. (NCT00477412)
Timeframe: Date of diagnosis to last known date of survival, up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II- Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)44

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response Rate

Response rate is determined by CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, unilateral BM biopsy and aspirate with lymphoma markers (if initially positive) and colonoscopy/endoscopy if applicable. (NCT00477412)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase II- Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)87

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bortezomib (Phase I)

Determine the safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bortezomib when added to the combination of rituximab, methotrexate, and cytarabine alternating with bortezomib, rituximab-hyperCVAD in patients with untreated aggressive mantle cell lymphoma. (NCT00477412)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 - End of Cycle 2 up to 60 days.

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 1 Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)1.3

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Median time to progression or death (NCT00483262)
Timeframe: 10 months

Interventionmonth (Median)
CCI779 PFS Phase I5.7
CCI779 PFS Phase II5.0

[back to top]

Toxicity. Number of Patients With Specific Toxicities Are Reported.

Toxicity of CCI-779 (Temsirolimus) and bortezomib (Velcade) in patients with multiple myeloma. (NCT00483262)
Timeframe: 10 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
CCI779 Toxicity Phase I90
CCI779 Toxicity Phase II79

[back to top]

Best Response to Combination Treatment

Response rate of PR or better to the combination treatment of CCI-779 (Temsirolimus) and bortezomib (Velcade) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (NCT00483262)
Timeframe: 10 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
CCI779 Response Phase I10
CCI779 Response Phase II33

[back to top]

Response Rate After 2 Cycles of Treatment With Bortezomib and Rituximab

Partial response (PR) defined as at least > 50 % reduction of serum monoclonal IgM concentration determined by protein electrophoresis, > 50% decrease in adenopathy / organomegaly on physical examination or on CT scan, and no new symptoms or signs of active disease. Complete response (CR) defined as a disappearance of serum and urine monoclonal protein determined by immunofixation, absence of malignant cells in bone marrow determined by histologic evaluation, resolution of adenopathy/organomegaly (confirmed by computed tomography [CT] scan), and no signs or symptoms attributable to WM. Stable disease defined as neither grown nor shrunk; the amount of disease has not changed.Participants will be followed for < 6 months after receiving bortezomib/rituximab or rituximab-modified hyper-CVAD to be considered unresponsive to therapy in accordance with the guidelines of the Consensus Panel of the Third International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. (NCT00492050)
Timeframe: After 2 (35 day) cycles of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stable DiseasePartial ResponseProgressive DiseaseNo Response
All Participants201123

[back to top]

Response Rate After 3 Cycles of Treatment With Bortezomib and Rituximab

Partial response (PR) defined as at least > 50 % reduction of serum monoclonal IgM concentration determined by protein electrophoresis, > 50% decrease in adenopathy / organomegaly on physical examination or on CT scan, and no new symptoms or signs of active disease. Complete response (CR) defined as a disappearance of serum and urine monoclonal protein determined by immunofixation, absence of malignant cells in bone marrow determined by histologic evaluation, resolution of adenopathy/organomegaly (confirmed by computed tomography [CT] scan), and no signs or symptoms attributable to WM. Stable disease defined as neither grown nor shrunk; the amount of disease has not changed. Participants will be followed for < 6 months after receiving bortezomib/rituximab or rituximab-modified hyper-CVAD to be considered unresponsive to therapy in accordance with the guidelines of the Consensus Panel of the Third International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. (NCT00492050)
Timeframe: After 3 (35 day) cycles of treatment

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stable DiseasePartial ResponseNo Response
All Participants7162

[back to top]

Participants Ability to Collect Stem Cells After Treatment With Bortezomib and Rituximab

Number of Participants who were able to collect stem cells successfully or unable to collect after treatment with bortezomib and rituximab. (NCT00492050)
Timeframe: 4 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants Collected SuccessfullyParticipants Unable to Collect
All Participants307

[back to top]

Complete Response

Complete Response (NCT00504751)
Timeframe: 26 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Study Treatment3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response

Participants with a best overall response of complete response, defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. Response was assessed by the Investigator using the IMWG uniform response criteria. (NCT00507416)
Timeframe: Response assessed every other cycle, for up to 13 cycles (49 weeks).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone3
Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone4
Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone4

[back to top]

Time to Alternative Therapy

Time to alternative therapy is defined as the time between randomization and alternative therapy. Participants who did not receive alternative therapy were censored at the time of last contact. (NCT00507416)
Timeframe: From randomization until alternative therapy. Median follow-up time was 43 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone19.7
Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone24.5
Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone19.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response

"Overall response defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR), assessed by the Investigator using the IMWG uniform response criteria.~CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours (h).~PR requires 1 of the following:~≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to <200 mg/24 h, or~If M-protein not measurable, a ≥50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, or~If FLC not measurable, a ≥ 50% reduction in plasma cells, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was ≥30%.~If present at baseline, a ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required." (NCT00507416)
Timeframe: Response assessed every other cycle for up to 13 cycles (49 weeks).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone73
Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone80
Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone70

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time between randomization and death. Participants still alive at the cutoff date or lost to follow-up were censored at the date of last contact. (NCT00507416)
Timeframe: From randomization until death. Median follow-up time was 43 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone49.8
Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone51.5
Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone53.1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. Participants who did not progress and were still alive at the cut-off date were censored at the date of last contact. Response was assessed by the Investigator using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria.~Progressive disease requires 1 of the following:~Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in:~Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl)~Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours)~In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 100 mg/dl)~Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%)~Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas.~Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease" (NCT00507416)
Timeframe: From randomization until disease progression. Median follow-up time was 43 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone14.7
Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone15.4
Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone17.3

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined in participants with an overall response as the time between first documentation of response and disease progression. Responders without disease progression were censored at the last clinical assessment of response. (NCT00507416)
Timeframe: From first documented response until disease progression. Median follow-up time was 43 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone18.3
Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone22.4
Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone19.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or a Very Good Partial Response

"Complete response is defined by negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Very good partial response is defined by serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours.~Response was assessed by the Investigator using the IMWG uniform response criteria." (NCT00507416)
Timeframe: Response assessed every other cycle for up to 13 cycles (49 weeks).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone37
Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone51
Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone41

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 - Global Health Status

"The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).~The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement." (NCT00507416)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 3, Day 1 (n=129, 115, 125)Cycle 5, Day 1 (n=114, 98, 107)Cycle 7, Day 1 (n=89, 79, 84)Cycle 9, Day 1 (n=87, 66, 67)Cycle 11, Day 1 (n=71, 61, 65)Cycle 13, Day 1 (n=67, 52, 61)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone1.3-4.9-3.3-4.2-11.6-10.2
Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone2.0-0.4-4.7-1.02.81.0
Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone-4.4-6.1-8.6-8.1-7.9-8.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of death (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks or until death

Interventiondays (Median)
V-DRNA
VDCRNA
V-DCNA
VDC-modNA

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Stringent Complete Response Rate

Stringent Complete Response is defined as complete response plus normal free light chain (kappa/lambda) ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence. (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks or until disease progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
V-DR7
VDCR6
V-DC3
VDC-mod5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Overall Response

"Overall Response includes complete response and partial response.~Complete response requires negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Partial response requires at least 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by at least 90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hour." (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks or until disease progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
V-DR35
VDCR35
V-DC24
VDC-mod17

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Combined Complete Response and Very Good Partial Response

"Complete response requires negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Very good partial response requires serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 h" (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks or until disease progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
V-DR21
VDCR23
V-DC13
VDC-mod9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)

Evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug through the 30 day post-treatment AE assessment visit

Interventionparticipants (Number)
V-DR42
VDCR65
V-DC33
VDC-mod17

[back to top]

Duration of Response

"Duration of response is the time from date of first documented confirmed response to date of first documented progressive disease. A confirmed response is a response that has been observed on at least two consecutive assessments.~Disease progression requires any one or more of the following: serum m-protein increase >= 25% from nadir(absolute increase >= 0.5 g/dL); Urine m-protein increase >= 25% from nadir(absolute increase >= 200 mg/24 hr), bone marrow plasma cell percentage increase >= 25% from nadir(absolute increase >= 10%), new bone lesion or soft tissue plasmacytomas." (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks or until disease progression

Interventiondays (Median)
V-DRNA
VDCRNA
V-DCNA
VDC-modNA

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Complete Response Rate + Near Complete Response Rate

"Complete response requires negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Near Complete response requires positive immunofixation on the serum and/or urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow." (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks or until disease progression

Interventionparticipants (Number)
V-DR17
VDCR14
V-DC10
VDC-mod8

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response is defined as time from date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of a confirmed response. confirmed response is a response that has been observed on at least two consecutive assessments. (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks or until disease response

Interventiondays (Median)
V-DR49
VDCR50
V-DC55
VDC-mod49

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

"Time to disease progression is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented progressive disease.~Disease progression requires any one or more of the following: serum m-protein increase >= 25% from nadir(absolute increase >= 0.5 g/dL); Urine m-protein increase >= 25% from nadir(absolute increase >= 200 mg/24 hr), bone marrow plasma cell percentage increase >= 25% from nadir(absolute increase >= 10%), new bone lesion or soft tissue plasmacytomas." (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks or until disease progression

Interventiondays (Median)
V-DRNA
VDCRNA
V-DCNA
VDC-modNA

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival is defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progressive disease or death.~Disease progression requires any one or more of the following: serum m-protein increase >= 25% from nadir(absolute increase >= 0.5 g/dL); Urine m-protein increase >= 25% from nadir(absolute increase >= 200 mg/24 hr), bone marrow plasma cell percentage increase >= 25% from nadir(absolute increase >= 10%), new bone lesion or soft tissue plasmacytomas." (NCT00507442)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks or until disease progression/death

Interventiondays (Median)
V-DRNA
VDCR631
V-DCNA
VDC-modNA

[back to top]

Probability of 1-year Survival

(NCT00507442)
Timeframe: survival probability at 1 year after randomization

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
V-DR100
VDCR91.6
V-DC100
VDC-mod100

[back to top]

Complete and Partial Response

"Complete Response: Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease, disappearance of all disease-related symptoms and normalization of biochemical abnormalities (eg. LDH) definitely assignable to follicular lymphoma.~Partial Response requires the following:~greater than or equal to 50% decrease in the SPD of the 6 largest dominant nodes of nodal masses.~No increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen.~Splenic and hepatic nodes must regress by at least 50% in sum of the products (SPD).~Bone marrow assessment in irrelevant for determination of Partial Response since it is not measurable disease; however, if positive the type of cell should be reported.~No new lesions." (NCT00510887)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VR-FND64

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is measured from time of treatment to time of disease progression (NCT00510887)
Timeframe: up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
VR-FND16.47143

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Neuropathy, Any Grade

Before each drug dose, the patient will be evaluated for possible toxicities that may have occurred after the previous dose(s). Toxicities are to be assessed according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). (NCT00510887)
Timeframe: up to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
VR-FND6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Grade 3-4 Hematologic Toxicity.

Before each drug dose, the patient will be evaluated for possible toxicities that may have occurred after the previous dose(s). Toxicities are to be assessed according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). (NCT00510887)
Timeframe: up to 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
VR-FND7

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Overall Survival

Overall survival is from the day of enrollment to date of death from any cause. (NCT00510887)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VR-FND27

[back to top]

Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival is measured from treatment to progression or death, whichever comes first. Progressive disease is measured as: 50% or greater increase from nadir in the sum of the products (SPD) of any previously identified abnormal node and the appearance of any new lesions during or at the end of treatment. (NCT00510887)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VR-FND17

[back to top]

Patients With Inhibition in NF-kB Activation (Phase I)

Patient with a minimum of 50% reduction from baseline on day 8 or day 29 in NF-kB, measured by picograms/milliliter in peripheral mononuclear blood cells (NCT00512798)
Timeframe: at baseline, on day 8 and on day 29

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I0

[back to top]

Patients With Inhibition of NF-kB (Phase II)

Patient with a minimum of 50% reduction from baseline on day 8 or day 29 in NF-kB, measured by picograms/milliliter in peripheral mononuclear blood cells (NCT00512798)
Timeframe: at baseline, on day 8 and on day 29

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase II0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Clinical Anti-tumor Activity Phase II)

Per RECIST criteria v. 1.0: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions, partial response (PR) > 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, progressive disease (PD) > 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions, stable disease (SD) neither sufficient decrease nor increase of the sum of smallest sum of the LD of target lesions. Patients with CR + PR + SD (NCT00512798)
Timeframe: every 9 weeks to a maximum of 54 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Phase II01522

[back to top]

Optimal Doses of Temozolomide and Bortezomib (Phase I)

The optimal biologic dose (OBD) defined as the dose that achieves the greatest degree of inhibition of NF-κB activation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells when co-administered with Temozolomide (NCT00512798)
Timeframe: up to 42 days

Interventionmg/m2 (Number)
bortezomibtemozolomide
Phase I1.375

[back to top]

Patients With Clinical Anti-tumor Activity (Phase I)

Per RECIST criteria v. 1.0: measurable lesions: complete response (CR) disappearance of target lesions, partial response (PR) > 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, progressive disease (PD) > 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions or appearance of new lesions, stable disease (SD) neither sufficient decrease nor increase of the sum of smallest sum of the LD of target lesions (NCT00512798)
Timeframe: every 9 weeks up to a maximum of 54 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Phase I04114

[back to top]

Overall Survival

time from day of registration until day of death. (NCT00520767)
Timeframe: time from day of registration until 72 months.

Interventionmonth (Median)
Melphalan, Dexamethasone, Bortezomib,31.1

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

Time from start of treatment until date of documented disease progression, removal from protocol due to toxicity, or death from any cause. (NCT00520767)
Timeframe: start of treatment until 72 months

Interventionmonth (Median)
Melphalan, Dexamethasone, Bortezomib,18.1

[back to top]

Complete Hematologic Response

(NCT00520767)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Melphalan, Dexamethasone, Bortezomib,16

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the earliest documentation of disease progression (PD) or death. If a patient died without evidence of PD, the patient was considered an event if death occurred within 3 months of the last disease assessment. Patients who died outside of the specified interval or patients who were alive without evidence of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment.~The PFS results are based on data as of August 2012, while overall survival (OS) was updated in April 2014. Given the early termination and limited sample size, data management efforts to update PFS were not pursued." (NCT00522392)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months if patient is < 2 years from study entry, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from study entry, every 12 months if patient is 6-10 years from study entry, up to 10 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A (VRD)NA
Arm B (VD)17.4

[back to top]

Response Rates (Complete Response [CR] or Very Good Partial Response [VGPR])

"CR:~Patients with complete disappearance of an M-protein and no evidence of myeloma in the bone marrow are considered to have CR. To be considered CR, patients must meet all of the following criteria:~Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine at two consecutive times~Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas~≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow~If serum and urine M protein are unmeasurable and the immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) parameter is being used, patients must have a normal ratio of 0.26-1.65 at two consecutive times~VGPR:~Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis OR~>=90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg per 24 hours (by SPEP and UPEP)~If the serum and urine M protein are unmeasurable and the immunoglobulin FLC parameter is being used, a >90% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M protein criteria" (NCT00522392)
Timeframe: Assessed at the end of each cycle, every 3 months if patient is < 2 years from study entry, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from study entry, every 12 months if patient is 6-10 years from study entry, up to 10 years

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (VRD)0.625
Arm B (VD)0.188

[back to top]

Change in Quality of Life (QOL) From Baseline to 6 Months Post Consolidation as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neurotoxicity Trial Outcome Index (FACT-Ntx TOI)

The combined score on the FACT-Ntx TOI is of interest. The FACT-Ntx TOI has 25 items and the score ranges from 0 (worst possible quality of life) -100 (best possible quality of life). The primary QOL endpoint is defined as the change in the FACT-Ntx TOI score from registration to 6 months post consolidation treatment. (NCT00522392)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 months post consolidation treatment

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Arm A (VRD)-7.9
Arm B (VD)-2.6

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date of last known alive. The OS results are based on data as of April 2014. (NCT00522392)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months if patient is < 2 years from study entry, every 6 months if patient is 2-5 years from study entry, every 12 months if patient is 6-10 years from study entry, up to 10 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm A (VRD)64.0
Arm B (VD)NA

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

(NCT00523848)
Timeframe: Every 3 monthsntil the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first

Interventionmonths (Median)
VDT: VELCADE, Doxil and Low-dose Thalidomide27.8

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (Complete and Partial)

(NCT00523848)
Timeframe: Every 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VDT: VELCADE, Doxil and Low-dose Thalidomide77.50

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

(NCT00523848)
Timeframe: Every 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VDT: VELCADE, Doxil and Low-dose Thalidomide22.50

[back to top]

Percent of Participants Achieving Overall Combined Complete Response (CR) Following High-dose Chemotherapy (HDT)/Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT)

"Percent of Participants Achieving Overall Combined Complete Response (CR) (CR w/normalized serum κ:λ ratio + CR + Near Complete Response (nCR)) following stem cell transplantation.~CR criteria: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~κ:λ ratio: normal free light chain (FLC) ratio~nCR criteria: positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow." (NCT00531453)
Timeframe: all data included in clinical database as of 10 April 2009

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Three Drug Regimen (VDT)76
Four Drug Regimen (VDTC)78

[back to top]

Percent of Particpants Achieving Overall Combined Complete Response (CR) Following Induction

"Percent of Particpants Achieving Overall combined complete response (CR w/normalized serum κ:λ ratio + CR + near complete response (nCR)) following induction therapy.~CR criteria: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~κ:λ ratio: normal free light chain (FLC) ratio~nCR criteria: positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow." (NCT00531453)
Timeframe: all data included in clinical database as of 10 April 2009

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Three Drug Regimen (VDT)51
Four Drug Regimen (VDTC)44

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR), the Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment

The percentage of patients who experience an objective benefit from treatment, determined by the treating physician after reviewing key laboratory values from blood and urine. (NCT00536575)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Sorafenib/Bortezomib15

[back to top]

Toxicity of Drug Combination in the Subjects

(NCT00547534)
Timeframe: Two years

InterventionLymphoma Subjects (Number)
Lymphoma Subjects13

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response rate (ORR)to protocol treatment - Partial response, Complete response, etc. (NCT00547534)
Timeframe: Two years

InterventionLymphoma Subjects (Number)
Lymphoma Subjects13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 2 Years

To determine the progression-free survival following treatment with the BVR combination in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent and mantle cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. (NCT00547534)
Timeframe: Two years

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Lymphoma Subjects13

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00548717)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Siro/MMF39
Siro/MMF/Bort0

[back to top]

Incidence of 100 Day Mortality

(NCT00548717)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Siro/MMF31
Siro/MMF/Bort0

[back to top]

To Determine the Rate of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD When Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil or Sirolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Bortezomib is Used for GVHD Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies

(NCT00548717)
Timeframe: 150 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Siro/MMF77
Siro/MMF/Bort100

[back to top]

The Rate of Renal Insufficiency

"Renal function will be measured weekly after transplant for 4 weeks, at 8 weeks and then at 3 month intervals from transplantation. Sentinel renal events such as the occurrence of thrombotic microangiopathy will be noted.~The rationale for the substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for tacrolimus is to continue to prevent acute GVHD, but minimize renal toxicity after transplantation. We will thus monitor renal toxicity closely in this study. In our previous experience, the rate of grade III-V renal toxicity by day 100 after transplantation was about 10%. Here, grade III is defined as a creatinine level between 3.1 to 6 times the normal level, grade IV is defined as a creatinine level 6 times or more the normal level, and grade V is defined as a fatality due to renal toxicity." (NCT00548717)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Siro/MMF1
Siro/MMF/Bort0

[back to top]

Incidence of Chronic GVHD

"Chronic GVHD will be graded according to the modified Seattle criteria. Chronic GVHD divided into limited and extensive and evaluated across the following systems: skin, cutaneous structures, liver, mouth, eyes, esophagus, intestines, lung, musculoskeletal, serous, nervous, urologic, vagina, hematopoietic, and immune.~Localized skin involvement with or without hepatic dysfunction is classified as limited disease.~Generalized skin involvement or limited disease plus eye involvement, oral involvement, hepatic dysfunction with abnormal liver histology, or involvement of any other target organ was classified as extensive disease.~Lee SJ, Vogelsang G, Flowers ME. Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant.~2003;9:215-33." (NCT00548717)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Siro /MMF15
Siro/MMF/Bort50

[back to top]

Donor Stem Cell Engraftment, Including Donor-host Hematopoietic Chimerism Studies Post Transplant

Engraftment of donor cells by week 4 after transplantation. Assessment of donor stem cell engraftment will include donor-host hematopoietic chimerism analyses at 4 weeks and every 3 months after transplantation. Chimerism measured from peripheral blood or from bone marrow. (NCT00548717)
Timeframe: 30 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Siro/MMF9
Siro/MMF/Bort2

[back to top]

To Correlate the Serum Concentrations of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Its Metabolites With Acute GVHD Incidence

This outcome measure was presented as a comparison between incidence of Grade 0-I aGVHD and Grade II-IV aGVHD across 5 time points (Weeks 1,2,3,8, and 12). (NCT00548717)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 1 MMF level (0-I aGVHD), n=3Week 1 MMF level (II-IV aGVHD), n=8Week 2 MMF level (0-I aGVHD), n=3Week 2 MMF level (II-IV aGVHD), n=6Week 3 MMF level (0-I aGVHD), n=3Week 3 MMF level (II-IV aGVHD), n=6Week 8 MMF level (0-I aGVHD), n=3Week 8 MMF level (II-IV aGVHD), n=4Week 12 MMF level (0-I aGVHD), n=2Week 12 MMF level (II-IV aGVHD), n=4
Siro/MMF2.432.703.403.072.572.852.372.131.752.20

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Overall Response Defined as Complete Response and Partial Response

"Response is assessed by investigator according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria.~A complete response requires disappearance of all evidence of disease. A partial response is a >/= 50% decrease in the sum of products of 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses as well as for splenic and hepatic nodules. No increase in size of nodes, liver or spleen and no new sites of disease." (NCT00553644)
Timeframe: Duration of treatment (assessed up to 6 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Antiangiogenesis Therapy, Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)21

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from study entry until death. The median OS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.. (NCT00553644)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 6 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Treatment (Antiangiogenesis Therapy, Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)2.17

[back to top]

Incidence of Adverse Events

Number of participants who experienced a maximum grade 3, 4 or 5 adverse event. The grading scales found in the revised NCI CTCAE version 4.0 was utilized for adverse event reporting (NCT00553644)
Timeframe: Duration of Treatment (up to 6 years)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Treatment (Antiangiogenesis Therapy, Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)429171

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to progression (TTP) is defined as the time from study entry until progression or death due to any cause. The median TTP with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00553644)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 6 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Treatment (Antiangiogenesis Therapy, Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)0.58

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS): Phase 2

"PFS was the time from start of study treatment to date progressive disease was documented or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD]), or from adverse event (AE) data (where the outcome was Death). PD: >=25% increase from lowest response level in serum M-component or urine M-component, >=10% bone marrow plasma cell percentage, definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas, development of hypercalcemia, attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder." (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days after last dose of palbociclib

Interventionmonths (Median)
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)3.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR): Phase 2

OR: confirmed stringent complete response(sCR),complete response(CR),very good partial response(VGPR) or partial response(PR) as per International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (IMWGURC). sCR: normal serum free light chain (FLC) ratio, absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. CR: disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5 percent (%) plasma cells in bone marrow, negative immunofixation on serum, urine. VGPR: serum, urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein, <100 mg/24 hour (hr) urine M-protein. PR: >=50% reduction in serum M-protein, reduction in 24-hr urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 hr, >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels if serum, urine M-protein were unmeasurable, >= 50% reduction in plasma cells, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell was >=30% if serum, urine M-protein were unmeasurable and serum free light assay was unmeasureable. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (up to cycle 22 for schedule B)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:ScheduleB)20

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS): Phase 2

OS was defined as the time from first dose of study medication to first documentation of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date or last known alive date [if death date unavailable] minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (baseline) up to end of study (up to Cycle 22 for schedule B), thereafter every 3 months until 1 year after the last dose of palbociclib

Interventionmonths (Median)
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)21.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities: Phase 2

Laboratory parameters included hematology (hemoglobin, platelets, leukocytes, total neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes); liver function (total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, total protein); renal function (creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid); electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium and phosphate); urinalysis (protein and immunology [C reactive protein]), and clinical chemistry (glucose). Total number of participants with laboratory abnormalities was reported. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days after last dose of palbociclib

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)30

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of PD-0332991: Phase 1

MTD=highest dose level for which no more than 1 out of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT=any of the following treatment-related events: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than (<)1000/microliter (mcL) (Grade 3 neutropenia) associated with documented infection/fever >=38.5degrees Celsius (C); Grade >=3 nonhematologic treatment-related toxicity, except those that were not maximally treated or considered tolerable, Grade 3 corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation (QTc >500 millisecond [msec]) in asymptomatic participants even after repeat testing to exclude confounding factors and correction of reversible causes; Delay in the administration of Cycle 2 for more than 1 week of the planned date due to platelet count <25,000/mcL and/or ANC <500/mcL, or due to prolonged nonhematologic toxicities of Grade >=3; Inability to deliver at least 80 percent (%) of the planned PD 0332991 or bortezomib doses during Cycle 1 due to toxicity. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28 during Cycle 1 in schedule A, Day 1 up to Day 21 during Cycle 1 in schedule B

Interventionmilligram (mg) (Number)
Palbociclib + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone (Phase1:Schedule A)NA
Palbociclib + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone (Phase1:ScheduleB)100

[back to top]

Duration of Objective Response (DR): Phase 2

DR was defined as time from first documentation of objective tumor response (sCR, CR, VGPR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed to first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause since treatment started. sCR: normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. CR: disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow, negative immunofixation on serum, urine. VGPR: serum, urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, >=90% reduction in serum M-protein, <100 mg/24hr urine M-protein. PR:>=50% reduction in serum M-protein, reduction in 24-hr urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 hr. PD: >=25% increase from lowest response level in serum M-component, urine M-component, >=10% bone marrow plasma cell percentage, development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/increase in size of existing bone lesions, development of hypercalcemia, attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days after last dose of palbociclib

Interventionmonths (Median)
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)4.63

[back to top]

Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20): Phase 2

The QLQ-MY20 consisted of 20 items addressing 4 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important to participants with multiple myeloma: future perspective (2 items), pain/disease symptoms (6 items), social support /body image (2 items), and treatment side-effects (10 items). All items used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'). Scores for HRQoL domains were calculated as an average of the individual items, transformed to 0 to 100 range. Higher scores on symptom scales (disease symptoms and side effects of treatment) indicated a higher level of symptoms/problems. Higher scores on functional scales (future perspective and body image) indicated a higher level of QoL/functioning. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: C1D1 (baseline), C1D8, C1D15, C2D1, C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1, C21D1, C22D1, End of Treatment (assessment at early withdrawal occurring up to Cycle 22)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1D1: Disease Symptoms (n=27)C1D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=27)C1D1: Future Perspective (n=27)C1D1: Body Image (n=27)C1D8: Disease Symptoms (n=25)C1D8: Side Effects of Treatment (n=25)C1D8: Future Perspective (n=25)C1D8: Body Image (n=25)C1D15: Disease Symptoms (n=25)C1D15: Side Effects of Treatment (n=25)C1D15: Future Perspective (n=25)C1D15: Body Image (n=25)C2D1: Disease Symptoms (n=25)C2D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=25)C2D1: Future Perspective (n=25)C2D1: Body Image (n=25)C3D1: Disease Symptoms (n=21)C3D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=21)C3D1: Future Perspective (n=21)C3D1: Body Image (n=21)C4D1: Disease Symptoms (n=18)C4D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=18)C4D1: Future Perspective (n=18)C4D1: Body Image (n=18)C5D1: Disease Symptoms (n=17)C5D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=17)C5D1: Future Perspective (n=17)C5D1: Body Image (n=17)C6D1: Disease Symptoms (n=15)C6D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=15)C6D1: Future Perspective (n=15)C6D1: Body Image (n=15)C7D1: Disease Symptoms (n=11)C7D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=11)C7D1: Future Perspective (n=11)C7D1: Body Image (n=11)C8D1: Disease Symptoms (n=10)C8D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=10)C8D1: Future Perspective (n=10)C8D1: Body Image (n=10)C9D1: Disease Symptoms (n=9)C9D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=9)C9D1: Future Perspective (n=9)C9D1: Body Image (n=9)C10D1: Disease Symptoms (n=6)C10D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=6)C10D1: Future Perspective (n=6)C10D1: Body Image (n=6)C11D1: Disease Symptoms (n=6)C11D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=6)C11D1: Future Perspective (n=6)C11D1: Body Image (n=6)C12D1: Disease Symptoms (n=5)C12D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=5)C12D1: Future Perspective (n=5)C12D1: Body Image (n=5)C13D1: Disease Symptoms (n=6)C13D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=6)C13D1: Future Perspective (n=6)C13D1: Body Image (n=6)C14D1: Disease Symptoms (n=6)C14D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=6)C14D1: Future Perspective (n=6)C14D1: Body Image (n=6)C15D1: Disease Symptoms (n=6)C15D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=6)C15D1: Future Perspective (n=6)C15D1: Body Image (n=6)C16D1: Disease Symptoms (n=6)C16D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=6)C16D1: Future Perspective (n=6)C16D1: Body Image (n=6)C17D1: Disease Symptoms (n=6)C17D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=6)C17D1: Future Perspective (n=6)C17D1: Body Image (n=6)C18D1: Disease Symptoms (n=6)C18D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=6)C18D1: Future Perspective (n=6)C18D1: Body Image (n=6)C19D1: Disease Symptoms (n=4)C19D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=4)C19D1: Future Perspective (n=4)C19D1: Body Image (n=4)C20D1: Disease Symptoms (n=2)C20D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=2)C20D1: Future Perspective (n=2)C20D1: Body Image (n=2)C21D1: Disease Symptoms (n=1)C21D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=1)C21D1: Future Perspective (n=1)C21D1: Body Image (n=1)C22D1: Disease Symptoms (n=1)C22D1: Side Effects of Treatment (n=1)C22D1: Future Perspective (n=1)C22D1: Body Image (n=1)End of Treatment: Disease Symptoms (n=17)End of Treatment: Side Effects of Treatment (n=17)End of Treatment: Future Perspective (n=17)End of Treatment: Body Image (n=17)
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)35.6825.6146.5024.6935.5123.9044.4413.3332.3126.8948.8928.0029.8224.7346.2217.3325.1325.0144.4420.6328.7126.6444.4525.9327.7827.5245.7525.4924.0825.0440.7420.0025.9626.7744.4430.3018.5626.4135.5630.0019.1419.7539.5125.9325.9318.8333.3316.6718.5218.5238.8922.2228.8924.3053.3340.0025.0018.7037.0433.3319.4518.6435.1916.6723.1518.0938.8916.6727.7816.9137.0422.2224.0719.2638.8922.2241.8518.5238.8933.3343.0625.7438.8941.6744.4535.1966.6750.0077.7836.6744.4433.3361.1133.3344.4466.6737.5829.5146.4129.41

[back to top]

Modified Version of Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-sf) Questionnaire: Phase 2

"m-BPI-sf was a questionnaire designed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions. m-BPI-sf contained questions that assessed pain severity (worst, least, average, right now) and pain interference (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life). Each question was answered on a scale ranging from 0 No pain to 10 Pain as bad as you can imagine. The 4 pain severity questions were averaged to derive an index of pain severity and the 7 function questions were averaged to derive an index for pain interference. Total score range for pain severity and interference indices: 0 to 10, where higher score indicated higher severity/interference." (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: C1D1 (baseline), C1D8, C1D15, C2D1, C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1, C21D1, C22D1, End of Treatment (assessment at early withdrawal occurring up to Cycle 22)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1D1: Pain Severity (n=26)C1D8: Pain Severity (n=25)C1D15: Pain Severity (n=24)C2D1: Pain Severity (n=24)C3D1: Pain Severity (n=21)C4D1: Pain Severity (n=17)C5D1: Pain Severity (n=16)C6D1: Pain Severity (n=14)C7D1: Pain Severity (n=10)C8D1: Pain Severity (n=9)C9D1: Pain Severity (n=9)C10D1: Pain Severity (n=6)C11D1: Pain Severity (n=5)C12D1: Pain Severity (n=5)C13D1: Pain Severity (n=6)C14D1: Pain Severity (n=6)C15D1: Pain Severity (n=6)C16D1: Pain Severity (n=6)C17D1: Pain Severity (n=6)C18D1: Pain Severity (n=6)C19D1: Pain Severity (n=4)C20D1: Pain Severity (n=2)C21D1: Pain Severity (n=1)C22D1: Pain Severity (n=1)End of Treatment: Pain Severity (n=16)C1D1: Pain Interference (n=25)C1D8: Pain Interference (n=25)C1D15: Pain Interference (n=23)C2D1: Pain Interference (n=23)C3D1: Pain Interference (n=21)C4D1: Pain Interference (n=17)C5D1: Pain Interference (n=16)C6D1: Pain Interference (n=14)C7D1: Pain Interference (n=10)C8D1: Pain Interference (n=9)C9D1: Pain Interference (n=9)C10D1: Pain Interference (n=6)C11D1: Pain Interference (n=5)C12D1: Pain Interference (n=5)C13D1: Pain Interference (n=6)C14D1: Pain Interference (n=6)C15D1: Pain Interference (n=6)C16D1: Pain Interference (n=6)C17D1: Pain Interference (n=6)C18D1: Pain Interference (n=6)C19D1: Pain Interference (n=4)C20D1: Pain Interference (n=2)C21D1: Pain Interference (n=1)C22D1: Pain Interference (n=1)End of Treatment: Pain Interference (n=16)
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)2.322.622.442.302.122.022.221.661.982.471.811.081.451.670.931.421.041.461.672.883.693.504.004.503.302.532.583.062.642.342.542.742.262.942.602.132.072.402.911.900.981.311.831.502.864.075.072.576.713.46

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity: Phase 2

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study medication in a participant who received study medication. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Adverse events were graded according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) criteria as 1=mild AE, 2=moderate AE, 3=severe AE, 4=life-threatening or disabling AE, 5=Death related to AE. The most severe grade was used in case of multiple occurrences of the same event. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days after last dose of palbociclib

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)29181

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Relationship to Study Medication: Phase 2

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study medication in a participant who received study medication. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication until 28 days after the last dose of study medication that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. All causality AEs included SAEs as well as non-serious AEs, without regard to relationship to the study medication, which occurred during the trial. Treatment-related were adverse events (serious as well as non-serious adverse events) considered related to study medication by the investigator. Number of participants with treatment related TEAEs and all causality TEAEs were summarized. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days after last dose of palbociclib

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All CausalityTreatment Related
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)3027

[back to top]

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Phase 2

EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores for functional scales, global health status and symptom scales were calculated as an average of individual items, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning, health status or greater degree of symptoms. Score of the single items were transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=greater degree of symptom/difficulty. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: C1D1 (baseline), C1D8, C1D15, C2D1, C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1, C17D1, C18D1, C19D1, C20D1, C21D1, C22D1, End of Treatment (assessment at early withdrawal occurring up to Cycle 22)

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
C1D1: Global Health Status (n=27)C1D1: Physical Functioning (n=27)C1D1: Role Functioning (n=27)C1D1: Emotional Functioning (n=27)C1D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=27)C1D1: Social Functioning (n=27)C1D1: Fatigue (n=27)C1D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=27)C1D1: Pain (n=27)C1D1: Dyspnea (n=27)C1D1: Insomnia (n=27)C1D1: Appetite Loss (n=27)C1D1: Constipation (n=27)C1D1: Diarrhea (n=27)C1D1: Financial Problems (n=26)C1D8: Global Health Status (n=26)C1D8: Physical Functioning (n=26)C1D8: Role Functioning (n=26)C1D8: Emotional Functioning (n=26)C1D8: Cognitive Functioning (n=26)C1D8: Social Functioning (n=26)C1D8: Fatigue (n=26)C1D8: Nausea and Vomiting (n=26)C1D8: Pain (n=26)C1D8: Dyspnea (n=26)C1D8: Insomnia (n=26)C1D8: Appetite Loss (n=26)C1D8: Constipation (n=26)C1D8: Diarrhea (n=26)C1D8: Financial ProblemsC1D15: Global Health StatusC1D15: Physical Functioning (n=25)C1D15: Role Functioning (n=25)C1D15: Emotional Functioning (n=25)C1D15: Cognitive Functioning (n=25)C1D15: Social Functioning (n=25)C1D15: Fatigue (n=25)C1D15: Nausea and Vomiting (n=25)C1D15: Pain (n=25)C1D15: Dyspnea (n=25)C1D15: Insomnia (n=25)C1D15: Appetite Loss (n=25)C1D15: Constipation (n=25)C1D15: Diarrhea (n=25)C1D15: Financial Problems (n=25)C2D1: Global Health Status (n=25)C2D1: Physical Functioning (n=25)C2D1: Role Functioning (n=25)C2D1: Emotional Functioning (n=25)C2D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=25)C2D1: Social Functioning (n=25)C2D1: Fatigue (n=25)C2D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=25)C2D1: Pain (n=25)C2D1: Dyspnea (n=25)C2D1: Insomnia (n=25)C2D1: Appetite Loss (n=25)C2D1: Constipation (n=25)C2D1: Diarrhea (n=25)C2D1: Financial Problems (n=25)C3D1: Global Health Status (n=25)C3D1: Physical Functioning (n=25)C3D1: Role Functioning (n=22)C3D1: Emotional Functioning (n=22)C3D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=22)C3D1: Social Functioning (n=22)C3D1: Fatigue (n=22)C3D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=22)C3D1: Pain (n=22)C3D1: Dyspnea (n=22)C3D1: Insomnia (n=22)C3D1: Appetite Loss (n=22)C3D1: Constipation (n=22)C3D1: Diarrhea (n=22)C3D1: Financial Problems (n=22)C4D1: Global Health Status (n=18)C4D1: Physical Functioning (n=18)C4D1: Role Functioning (n=18)C4D1: Emotional Functioning (n=18)C4D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=18)C4D1: Social Functioning (n=18)C4D1: Fatigue (n=18)C4D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=18)C4D1: Pain (n=18)C4D1: Dyspnea (n=18)C4D1: Insomnia (n=18)C4D1: Appetite Loss (n=18)C4D1: Constipation (n=18)C4D1: Diarrhea (n=18)C4D1: Financial Problems (n=18)C5D1:Global Health Status (n=17)C5D1: Physical Functioning (n=17)C5D1: Role Functioning (n=17)C5D1: Emotional Functioning (n=17)C5D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=17)C5D1: Social Functioning (n=17)C5D1: Fatigue (n=17)C5D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=17)C5D1: Pain (n=17)C5D1: Dyspnea (n=17)C5D1: Insomnia (n=17)C5D1: Appetite Loss (n=17)C5D1: Constipation (n=17)C5D1: Diarrhea (n=17)C5D1: Financial Problems (n=17)C6D1: Global Health Status (n=15)C6D1: Physical Functioning (n=15)C6D1: Role Functioning (n=15)C6D1: Emotional Functioning (n=15)C6D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=15)C6D1: Social Functioning (n=15)C6D1: Fatigue (n=15)C6D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=15)C6D1: Pain (n=15)C6D1: Dyspnea (n=15)C6D1: Insomnia (n=15)C6D1: Appetite Loss (n=15)C6D1: Constipation (n=15)C6D1: Diarrhea (n=15)C6D1: Financial Problems (n=15)C7D1: Global Health Status (n=11)C7D1: Physical Functioning (n=11)C7D1: Role Functioning (n=11)C7D1: Emotional Functioning (n=11)C7D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=11)C7D1: Social Functioning (n=11)C7D1: Fatigue (n=11)C7D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=11)C7D1: Pain (n=11)C7D1: Dyspnea (n=11)C7D1: Insomnia (n=11)C7D1: Appetite Loss (n=11)C7D1: Constipation (n=11)C7D1: Diarrhea (n=11)C7D1: Financial Problems (n=11)C8D1: Global Health Status (n=10)C8D1: Physical Functioning (n=10)C8D1: Role Functioning (n=10)C8D1: Emotional Functioning (n=10)C8D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=10)C8D1: Social Functioning (n=10)C8D1: Fatigue (n=10)C8D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=10)C8D1: Pain (n=10)C8D1: Dyspnea (n=10)C8D1: Insomnia (n=10)C8D1: Appetite Loss (n=10)C8D1: Constipation (n=10)C8D1: Diarrhea (n=10)C8D1: Financial Problems (n=10)C9D1: Global Health Status (n=9)C9D1: Physical Functioning (n=9)C9D1: Role Functioning (n=9)C9D1: Emotional Functioning (n=9)C9D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=9)C9D1: Social Functioning (n=9)C9D1: Fatigue (n=9)C9D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=9)C9D1: Pain (n=9)C9D1: Dyspnea (n=9)C9D1: Insomnia (n=9)C9D1: Appetite Loss (n=9)C9D1: Constipation (n=9)C9D1: Diarrhea (n=9)C9D1: Financial Problems (n=9)C10D1: Global Health Status (n=6)C10D1: Physical Functioning (n=6)C10D1: Role Functioning (n=6)C10D1: Emotional Functioning (n=6)C10D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=6)C10D1: Social Functioning (n=6)C10D1: Fatigue (n=6)C10D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=6)C10D1: Pain (n=6)C10D1: Dyspnea (n=6)C10D1: Insomnia (n=6)C10D1: Appetite Loss (n=6)C10D1: Constipation (n=6)C10D1: Diarrhea (n=6)C10D1: Financial Problems (n=6)C11D1: Global Health Status (n=5)C11D1: Physical Functioning (n=5)C11D1: Role Functioning (n=5)C11D1: Emotional Functioning (n=5)C11D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=5)C11D1: Social Functioning (n=5)C11D1: Fatigue (n=5)C11D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=5)C11D1: Pain (n=5)C11D1: Dyspnea (n=5)C11D1: Insomnia (n=5)C11D1: Appetite Loss (n=5)C11D1: Constipation (n=5)C11D1: Diarrhea (n=5)C11D1: Financial Problems (n=5)C12D1: Global Health Status (n=15)C12D1: Physical Functioning (n=15)C12D1: Role Functioning (n=15)C12D1: Emotional Functioning (n=15)C12D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=15)C12D1: Social Functioning (n=15)C12D1: Fatigue (n=15)C12D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=15)C12D1: Pain (n=15)C12D1: Dyspnea (n=15)C12D1: Insomnia (n=15)C12D1: Appetite Loss (n=15)C12D1: Constipation (n=15)C12D1: Diarrhea (n=15)C12D1: Financial Problems (n=15)C13D1: Global Health Status (n=6)C13D1: Physical Functioning (n=6)C13D1: Role Functioning (n=6)C13D1: Emotional Functioning (n=6)C13D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=6)C13D1: Social Functioning (n=6)C13D1: Fatigue (n=6)C13D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=6)C13D1: Pain (n=6)C13D1: Dyspnea (n=6)C13D1: Insomnia (n=6)C13D1: Appetite Loss (n=6)C13D1: Constipation (n=6)C13D1: Diarrhea (n=6)C13D1: Financial Problems (n=6)C14D1: Global Health Status (n=6)C14D1: Physical Functioning (n=6)C14D1: Role Functioning (n=6)C14D1: Emotional Functioning (n=6)C14D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=6)C14D1: Social Functioning (n=6)C14D1: Fatigue (n=6)C14D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=6)C14D1: Pain (n=6)C14D1: Dyspnea (n=6)C14D1: Insomnia (n=6)C14D1: Appetite Loss (n=6)C14D1: Constipation (n=6)C14D1: Diarrhea (n=6)C14D1: Financial Problems (n=6)C15D1: Global Health Status (n=6)C15D1: Physical Functioning (n=6)C15D1: Role Functioning (n=6)C15D1: Emotional Functioning (n=6)C15D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=6)C15D1: Social Functioning (n=6)C15D1: Fatigue (n=6)C15D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=6)C15D1: Pain (n=6)C15D1: Dyspnea (n=6)C15D1: Insomnia (n=6)C15D1: Appetite Loss (n=6)C15D1: Constipation (n=6)C15D1: Diarrhea (n=6)C15D1: Financial Problems (n=6)C16D1: Global Health Status (n=6)C16D1: Physical Functioning (n=6)C16D1: Role Functioning (n=6)C16D1: Emotional Functioning (n=6)C16D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=6)C16D1: Social Functioning (n=6)C16D1: Fatigue (n=6)C16D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=6)C16D1: Pain (n=6)C16D1: Dyspnea (n=6)C16D1: Insomnia (n=6)C16D1: Appetite Loss (n=6)C16D1: Constipation (n=6)C16D1: Diarrhea (n=6)C16D1: Financial Problems (n=6)C17D1: Global Health Status (n=6)C17D1: Physical Functioning (n=6)C17D1: Role Functioning (n=6)C17D1: Emotional Functioning (n=6)C17D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=6)C17D1: Social Functioning (n=6)C17D1: Fatigue (n=6)C17D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=6)C17D1: Pain (n=6)C17D1: Dyspnea (n=6)C17D1: Insomnia (n=6)C17D1: Appetite Loss (n=6)C17D1: Constipation (n=6)C17D1: Diarrhea (n=6)C17D1: Financial Problems (n=6)C18D1: Global Health Status (n=6)C18D1: Physical Functioning (n=6)C18D1: Role Functioning (n=6)C18D1: Emotional Functioning (n=6)C18D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=6)C18D1: Social Functioning (n=6)C18D1: Fatigue (n=6)C18D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=6)C18D1: Pain (n=6)C18D1: Dyspnea (n=6)C18D1: Insomnia (n=6)C18D1: Appetite Loss (n=6)C18D1: Constipation (n=6)C18D1: Diarrhea (n=6)C18D1: Financial Problems (n=6)C19D1: Global Health Status (n=4)C19D1: Physical Functioning (n=4)C19D1: Role Functioning (n=4)C19D1: Emotional Functioning (n=4)C19D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=4)C19D1: Social Functioning (n=4)C19D1: Fatigue (n=4)C19D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=4)C19D1: Pain (n=4)C19D1: Dyspnea (n=4)C19D1: Insomnia (n=4)C19D1: Appetite Loss (n=4)C19D1: Constipation (n=4)C19D1: Diarrhea (n=4)C19D1: Financial Problems (n=4)C20D1: Global Health Status (n=2)C20D1: Physical Functioning (n=2)C20D1: Role Functioning (n=2)C20D1: Emotional Functioning (n=2)C20D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=2)C20D1: Social Functioning (n=2)C20D1: Fatigue (n=2)C20D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=2)C20D1: Pain (n=2)C20D1: Dyspnea (n=2)C20D1: Insomnia (n=2)C20D1: Appetite Loss (n=2)C20D1: Constipation (n=2)C20D1: Diarrhea (n=2)C20D1: Financial Problems (n=2)C21D1: Global Health Status (n=1)C21D1: Physical Functioning (n=1)C21D1: Role Functioning (n=1)C21D1: Emotional Functioning (n=1)C21D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=1)C21D1: Social Functioning (n=1)C21D1: Fatigue (n=1)C21D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=1)C21D1: Pain (n=1)C21D1: Dyspnea (n=1)C21D1: Insomnia (n=1)C21D1: Appetite Loss (n=1)C21D1: Constipation (n=1)C21D1: Diarrhea (n=1)C21D1: Financial Problems (n=1)C22D1: Global Health Status (n=1)C22D1: Physical Functioning (n=1)C22D1: Role Functioning (n=1)C22D1: Emotional Functioning (n=1)C22D1: Cognitive Functioning (n=1)C22D1: Social Functioning (n=1)C22D1: Fatigue (n=1)C22D1: Nausea and Vomiting (n=1)C22D1: Pain (n=1)C22D1: Dyspnea (n=1)C22D1: Insomnia (n=1)C22D1: Appetite Loss (n=1)C22D1: Constipation (n=1)C22D1: Diarrhea (n=1)C22D1: Financial Problems (n=1)End of treatment: Global health status (n=17)End of Treatment: Physical Functioning (n=17)End of Treatment: Role Functioning (n=17)End of Treatment: Emotional Functioning (n=17)End of Treatment: Cognitive Functioning (n=17)End of Treatment: Social Functioning (n=17)End of Treatment: Fatigue (n=17)End of Treatment: Nausea and Vomiting (n=17)End of Treatment: Pain (n=17)End of Treatment: Dyspnea (n=17)End of Treatment: Insomnia (n=17)End of Treatment: Appetite Loss (n=17)End of Treatment: Constipation (n=17)End of Treatment: Diarrhea (n=17)End of Treatment: Financial Problems (n=17)
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)60.8064.2059.8870.3772.2269.1429.636.7935.8032.1043.2120.9927.1611.1133.3360.5867.1859.6272.7669.8770.5127.2412.8242.3130.7743.5924.3634.6215.3828.2055.3362.9352.6767.0068.0064.0033.0020.6745.3342.6740.0029.3332.0020.0029.3352.3363.7360.6765.6772.0064.6734.3312.6743.3333.3340.0022.6721.336.6729.3356.8268.1862.8868.5671.9770.4531.4414.3930.3036.3636.3622.7336.366.0634.8559.7263.1560.1967.1371.3064.8132.879.2630.5637.0435.1920.3733.335.5633.3352.4558.0456.8665.2067.6559.8034.8011.7631.3745.1027.4517.6535.299.8027.4561.1165.7861.1173.8972.2271.1126.117.7827.7831.1131.1111.1128.894.4426.6753.7956.3651.5266.6774.2468.1833.3312.1237.8820.0030.306.0627.2712.1227.2762.5056.0058.3378.3378.3373.3321.675.0031.6730.0036.6710.0020.000.0040.0056.4857.7868.5275.0072.2274.0725.005.5625.9233.3340.7411.1118.527.4140.7452.7852.2250.0070.8375.0083.3329.172.7833.3333.3344.4516.6716.670.0038.8961.6754.6753.3365.0073.3366.6635.006.6730.0020.0040.0013.3313.336.6726.6745.0052.0043.3363.3370.0050.0036.676.6743.3340.0033.3326.676.6713.3346.6754.1753.3455.5669.4469.4461.1130.565.5627.7822.2227.7816.6716.6722.2238.8961.1154.4550.0073.6183.3369.4526.392.7833.3322.2222.220.0016.675.5633.3366.6752.2361.1161.1172.2266.6722.222.7827.7827.7822.225.5616.675.5644.4552.7855.5650.0076.3977.7869.4423.610.0033.3327.7827.785.5611.1122.2244.4555.5651.1158.3473.6172.2272.2226.392.7830.5622.2250.005.5622.225.5644.4561.1148.8950.0070.8361.1163.8929.178.3361.1133.3333.3322.2222.225.5644.4445.8345.0037.5066.6745.8350.0033.3312.5058.3325.0041.6725.0050.000.0041.6737.5046.6733.3333.3316.6741.6766.6716.6766.6733.3450.0033.3316.6716.6783.3441.6753.3350.0066.670.0033.3333.3333.3366.670.0066.6733.330.000.00100.0016.6753.3350.0083.3333.3333.3316.6733.3383.330.0033.330.000.000.00100.0049.0256.0856.8662.2662.7565.6937.7416.6743.1441.1849.0225.4943.145.8845.10

[back to top]

Best Overall Response: Phase 1

Best overall response: best confirmed response on study after first study dose as per IMWGURC. sCR: normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, >=90% reduction in serum M-protein, <100 mg/24 hr urine M-protein. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein, reduction in 24-hr urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200mg/24 hr. Progressive disease (PD): >=25% increase from lowest response level in serum M-component or urine M-component, >=10% bone marrow plasma cell percentage, definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas, development of hypercalcemia, attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder. Stable disease (SD): criteria for CR, VGPR, PR or PD not met. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (baseline), assessed on Day 1 of every cycle up to end of study (up to Cycle 22 for schedule A and schedule B)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stringent Complete ResponseComplete ResponseVery Good Partial ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseIndeterminate
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase1:Schedule A)0000010
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase1:Schedule B)0000430
Palbociclib 125mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase1:Schedule B)0010211
Palbociclib 75mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase1:Schedule A)0010130

[back to top]

Time to Tumor Progression (TTP): Phase 2

TTP was defined as the time from first dose of study medication to first documentation of objective tumor progression. TTP was calculated as (first event date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. Tumor progression was determined from oncologic assessment data (where data meet the criteria for progressive disease [PD] per IMWGURC). PD: >=25% increase from lowest response level in serum M-component or urine M-component, >=10% bone marrow plasma cell percentage, definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas, development of hypercalcemia, attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT00555906)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (baseline) up to 28 days after last dose of palbociclib

Interventionmonths (Median)
Palbociclib 100mg+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(Phase2:Schedule B)3.9

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from start of treatment until progression or death, whichever occurred first. Participants were to be followed-up for 12 months following the last dose of dasatinib for progression and survival. PFS was analyzed for the all-treated population. (NCT00560352)
Timeframe: Day 1 to disease progression or death, whichever came first (maximum reached: 14 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
All Treated6.3

[back to top]

Best Overall Tumor Response Rate (RR) As Assessed Using International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma and Criteria of the European Bone Marrow Transplant Registry

S=serum; U=urine; MP=M-protein; ST=soft tissue, PC=plasmacytomas; IF=immunofixation; BL=baseline. RR calculated on best response any time. CR=MP undetectable by IF, ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow, and no ST PC. VGPR=MP detectable by IF, or ≥90% drop in S MP and U MP<100 mg/24h. PR= ≥50% drop in S MP and ≥90% drop in U MP or U protein <200 mg/24h, ≥50% drop in BL ST PC size. MR= ≥25% to <50% drop in S MP and ≥50% to <90% drop in U MP and ≥25% to <50% drop in BL ST PC. SD=Not CR, VGPR, PR, or MR. PD= ≥25% rise in S or U M-component; new/increased size of bone lesions, ST PC, or hypercalcemia. (NCT00560352)
Timeframe: Day 1 until last tumor assessment (maximum reached: 9 months)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Very good partial response (VGPR)Partial response (PR)Minimal response (MR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)Unable to determineNot reported
Dasatinib, 100 mg QD0000033.333.333.3
Dasatinib, 140 mg QD00025002550
Dasatinib, 50 mg BID0014.3057.114.3014.3

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response calculated for those with best response=CR (M-protein [MP] undetectable by immunofixation [IF], ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow, no soft tissue plasmacytomas); VGPR (MP detectable by IF, or ≥90% drop in serum [S] MP and urine [U] MP<100 mg/24h); PR(≥50% drop in S MP and ≥90% drop in U MP or U protein <200 mg/24h, ≥50% drop in BL ST PC size); or MR (≥25% to <50% drop in S MP and ≥50% to <90% drop in U MP and ≥25% to <50% drop in BL ST PC). Duration of response calculated from day criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, and MR were met until progression or death, whichever came first. (NCT00560352)
Timeframe: First occurrence of response to disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (maximum reached: 12.2 months)

,
InterventionMonths (Number)
Partial response (PR)Minimal response (MR)
Dasatinib, 140 mg QD012.2
Dasatinib, 50 mg BID5.4NA

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS), and Overall Survival (OS)

To obtain a preliminary estimate of PFS and OS. Overall survival (OS) is defined as time from the first chemotherapy administered on the transplant trial until death from any cause. Progression free survival (PFS)is defined as time from therapy until relapse, progression, or death from any cause. (NCT00571493)
Timeframe: one year post autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) , 5 years post ASCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Progression Free Survival 1 year after transplantOverall Survival 1 year after transplantProgression Free Survival 5 years after transplantOverall Survival 5 years after transplant
Phase II: Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival83913267

[back to top]

Preliminary Estimate of Overall Response Rate (ORR)

To obtain a preliminary estimate of overall response rate (ORR). The overall response rate is calculated as the number of patients who achieved complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) divided by the total number of evaluable patients. (NCT00571493)
Timeframe: 100 day post autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), one year post ASCT

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Overall Response Rate (100 days after transplant)Overall Response Rate (1 year after transplant)
Phase II: Overall Response Rate3833

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bortezomib

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined to be the dose cohort below which 3 of 6 patients experience dose limiting toxicity (DLT), or the highest dose cohort of 1.5 mg/m², if 2 DLT were not observed at any dose cohort. (NCT00571493)
Timeframe: 14 months

Interventionmg/m² (Number)
Phase I1.5
Phase II1.0

[back to top]

Median Duration of Stable Disease Response

Median number of months of Stable Disease Response Per RECIST v1.0 (Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started) (NCT00581360)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib + Doxorubicin8

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is the number participants experiencing partial response (PR) + the number participants experiencing complete response (CR) / the number participants experiencing partial response (PR) + the number participants experiencing complete response (CR) + the number participants experiencing stable disease (SD) + the number participants experiencing progressive disease (PD). RECIST v1.0 criteria for Target Lesions was used: Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions; Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest s (NCT00581360)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + Doxorubicin0

[back to top]

Stable Disease Rate

Using RECIST v1.0 criteria, stable disease rate is the number participants experiencing stable disease (SD) / the number participants experiencing partial response (PR) + the number participants experiencing complete response (CR) + the number participants experiencing stable disease (SD) + the number participants experiencing progressive disease (PD). (NCT00581360)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + Doxorubicin100

[back to top]

Number of Months of Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Number of months that participants experienced stable disease (the disease does not progress per RECIST v1.0 criteria - Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started) (NCT00581360)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Number)
Participant 1Participant 2Participant 3Participant 4Participant 5Participant 6Participant 7Participant 8Participant 9
Bortezomib + Doxorubicin823364282651

[back to top]

Number of Months of Survival

Number of months that the participant was alive. (NCT00581360)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Number)
Participant 1Participant 2Participant 3Participant 4Participant 5Participant 6Participant 7Participant 8Participant 9
Bortezomib + Doxorubicin29.1323.4034.508.0312.2016.1025.9324.971.27

[back to top]

3 Year Progression Free Survival

This is the percent of subjects who had not had any recurrence or relapse of disease as of 3 years after enrollment in the study. (NCT00581776)
Timeframe: 36 months

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
VCR-CVAD With Rituximab Maintenance63

[back to top]

3 Year Overall Survival (OS)

This is the percent of participants who were still alive at 3 years after study entry. (NCT00581776)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
VCR-CVAD With Rituximab Maintenance86

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Completion of Induction Chemotherapy, Which is the Percent of Complete Responses (CR) Plus Percent of Partial Responses (PR).

"Patients were considered evaluable for response if they completed at least 2 cycles of therapy and had undergone an initial response evaluation, or had disease progression after 1 cycle of therapy.~1999 International Working Group criteria defines a CR as patients with complete disappearance of disease, or regression of all lymph nodes to 1.5 cm in greatest diameter or less. Partial Response indicates patients responded to treatment with a reduction in the amount of tumor (50 percent or more). Overall response rate is the percent of complete responses plus the percent of partial responses." (NCT00581776)
Timeframe: At completion of induction therapy (21 weeks)

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
VCR-CVAD With Rituximab Maintenance90

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate (CR) at the End of Induction Chemotherapy

Complete Response Rate (CRR) as defined by 1999 International Working Group criteria, is defined as patients with complete disappearance of disease, or regression of all lymph nodes to 1.5 cm in greatest diameter or less. All subjects who had completed 2 cycles of therapy and had at least one disease evaluation, or had completed 1 cycle of therapy with progressive disease, were considered evaluable. (NCT00581776)
Timeframe: at 21 weeks

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
VCR-CVAD With Rituximab Maintenance77

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) 0-72 Hours

(NCT00608907)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 day 14 (72 hours post last dose)

Interventionng*h/mL (Mean)
VELCADE + Rifampicin123
VELCADE + Dexamethasone170
VELCADE215

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response was calculated from the documentation (date) of first response (CR, nCR, VGPR, or PR) until the date of progression or last follow-up in the subset of patients who responded. (NCT00609167)
Timeframe: Duration of study (up to 12 cycles)

Interventionmonths (Median)
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^2)NA
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.5mg/m^2)NA

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Achieved a Confirmed Responses Defined as a Complete Response (CR), Near CR or Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After the First 4 Months of Treatment

"Response that was confirmed on 2 consecutive evaluations during the first 4 months of treatment.~Complete Response(CR): Complete disappearance of M-protein from serum and urine on immunofixation, normalization of Free Light Chain (FLC) ratio and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~near Complete Response (nCR): Patients who meet all criteria for CR except a positive immunofixation will be classified as nCR.~Very Good Partial Response(VGPR): >=90% reduction in serum M-component; Urine M-Component <100mg per 24hours; <=5% plasma cells in bone marrow." (NCT00609167)
Timeframe: After 4 months of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^2)20
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.5mg/m^2)18

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Responded to Treatment (Complete Response,CR; Near Complete Response, nCR; Very Good Partial Response, VGPR; or Partial Response, PR) After 4 Cycles

"Response that was confirmed on 2 consecutive evaluations after 8 months of treatment.~CR, nCR and VGPR as defined in the primary outcome.~Partial Response(PR): >=50% reduction in serum M-component and/or~Urine M-Component >=90% reduction or <200mg per 24hours; or >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels." (NCT00609167)
Timeframe: 4 cycles

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^2)29
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.5mg/m^2)28

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Responded to Treatment (CR, nCR, VGPR or PR) After 8 Cycles

"Response that was confirmed on 2 consecutive evaluations after 8 cycles of treatment.~Criteria for CR, nCR, VGPR and PR are defined in prior outcomes." (NCT00609167)
Timeframe: After 8 cycles of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.5mg/m^2)1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Severe Adverse Events

Severe adverse events were defined as grade 3 or higher, regardless of attribution to study drugs. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3. (NCT00609167)
Timeframe: Every cycle during treatment (up to 12 cycles)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^2)16
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.5mg/m^2)11

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from registration to death of any cause. (NCT00609167)
Timeframe: From date of registration until death (up to 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^2)NA
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.5mg/m^2)NA

[back to top]

Participants Who Successfully Completed Collection of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Transplant

Evaluation of the ability to successfully collect peripheral blood stem cells following four months (cycles) of combination therapy. (NCT00609167)
Timeframe: After 4 cycles of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^2)33
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.5mg/m^2)17

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

"PFS was defined as the time from registration to progression or death due to any cause.~Progression was defined as any one or more of the following:~An increase of 25% from lowest confirmed response in:~Serum M-component (absolute increase >= 0.5g/dl)~Urine M-component (absolute increase >= 200mg/24hour~Difference between involved and uninvolved Free Light Chain levels (absolute increase >= 10mg/dl)~Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute increase of >=10%)~Definite development of new bone lesion or soft tissue plasmacytomas" (NCT00609167)
Timeframe: up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^2)NA
CyBorD (Bortezomib 1.5mg/m^2)NA

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival (OS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of death. Patients alive as of the last follow-up had OS censored at the last follow-up date. Median OS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00611325)
Timeframe: Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Assessed up to 60 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
EIAED8
Non-EIAED6

[back to top]

Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of first progression according to Macdonald criteria, or to death due to any cause. Per Macdonald, progression is a ≥ 25% increase in the sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions, any new lesion, or clinical deterioration. Patients alive who had not progressed as of the last follow-up had PFS censored at the last follow-up date. Median PFS was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. (NCT00611325)
Timeframe: Time in months from the start of study treatment to the date of first progression or death. Assessed up to 60 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
EIAED2
Non-EIAED2.5

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade 3 or Greater, Treatment-related, Non-hematologic Toxicities

Number of patients with grade 3 or greater, treatment-related, non-hematologic toxicities based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. (NCT00611325)
Timeframe: 60 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
EIAED27
Non-EIAED24

[back to top]

Radiographic Response Rate

The percentage of participants with a complete or partial response at any assessment as determined by the Macdonald criteria. A confirmation of response was not required. Per Macdonald criteria, complete response (CR) was the disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) was a ≥50% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, no new lesions and stable or decreasing steroid dose. Objective response =CR+PR. Tumor assessments were done at baseline and at the end of each 6 week treatment cycle, and overall best response was recorded. (NCT00611325)
Timeframe: 60 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EIAED7.1
Non-EIAED39.3

[back to top]

6-month Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Percentage of participants surviving six months from the initiation of treatment without progression of disease. PFS was defined as the time from the initiation of treatment to the date of the first documented progression according to the Macdonald criteria, or to death due to any cause. Per Macdonald, progression is a ≥ 25% increase in the sum of the products of perpendicular diameters of enhancing lesions, any new lesion or clinical deterioration. (NCT00611325)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
EIAED25
Non-EIAED28.6

[back to top]

Time to Best Response of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants

Measured from the time of study entry to the documented beginning of response (CR or PR). This is measured in responders per Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al. 2007.) CR: complete disappearance of detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; PR: 50% or greater decrease in sum of product of diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen, no new disease sites, patients with CR and persistent morphologic bone marrow involvement. (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) after discontinuation of study treatment for 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Previously Treated Participants2.04
Previously Untreated Participants2.37

[back to top]

Time to Best Response of Phase I and Phase II Participants

"Measured from the time of study entry to the documented beginning of response (CR or PR). This is measured in responders per Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al. 2007.) CR: complete disappearance of detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; PR: 50% or greater decrease in sum of product of diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen, no new disease sites, patients with CR and persistent morphologic bone marrow involvement.~Time to Best Response will be examined using time-to-event analysis methods. Kaplan-Meier figures will be generated and the log-rank test will be used to examine differences existing between various levels of stratification." (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) after discontinuation of study treatment for 2 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase I Participants (10 mg/15 mg Lenalidomide)63.50
Phase II Participants (10 mg Lenalidomide)71.50

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants

"Defined as the time from entry onto study until lymphoma progression or death from any cause.~Progression Free Survival will be examined using time-to-event analysis methods. Kaplan-Meier figures will be generated and the log-rank test will be used to examine differences existing between various levels of stratification." (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) after discontinuation of study treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months after documented disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Previously Treated Participants12.4517
Previously Untreated Participants25.2649

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) of Phase I and Phase II Participants

"Defined as the time from entry onto study until lymphoma progression or death from any cause.~Progression Free Survival will be examined using time-to-event analysis methods. Kaplan-Meier figures will be generated and the log-rank test will be used to examine differences existing between various levels of stratification." (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) after discontinuation of study treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months after documented disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I Participants (10 mg/15 mg Lenalidomide)27.70
Phase II Participants (10 mg Lenalidomide)19.35

[back to top]

Overall Survival of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants

"Defined as the date of study entry to the date of death.~Overall Survival will be examined using time-to-event analysis methods. Kaplan-Meier figures will be generated and the log-rank test will be used to examine differences existing between various levels of stratification" (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) after discontinuation of study treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months after documented disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Previously Treated Participants28.4189
Previously Untreated Participants71.2608

[back to top]

Overall Survival of Phase I and Phase II Participants

"Defined as the date of study entry to the date of death.~Overall Survival will be examined using time-to-event analysis methods. Kaplan-Meier figures will be generated and the log-rank test will be used to examine differences existing between various levels of stratification" (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) after discontinuation of study treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months after documented disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I Participants (10 mg/15 mg Lenalidomide)51.45
Phase II Participants (10 mg Lenalidomide)35.35

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants

Response to treatment (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) determined using Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al. 2007.) CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; PR: 50% or greater decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or extranodal masses, no increase in the size of other nodes, liver or spleen, no new sites of disease, patients who achieve CR but have persistent morphologic bone marrow involvement; Stable Disease (SD): failing to attain PR or CR, but not fulfilling criteria for progressive disease; Progressive Disease (PD)/Relapse: appearance of new lesions more than 1.5 cm in any axis, 50% or greater increase from nadir SPD of any previously involved sites, 50% or greater increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in short axis. (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks until treatment discontinuation then every 3 months thereafter, projected average 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Previously Treated Participants8
Previously Untreated Participants25

[back to top]

Incidence of Non-Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability, Phase II

"A count of affected participants with non-serious adverse events (regardless of relationship to study treatments) occurring in >= 15% of treated patients enrolled in the Phase II section of the study.~Lenalidomide DL-1 dose (10 mg orally, once daily (PO QD)) Day 1-14 followed by 7 days of rest, Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1; Cycles 2-6: 375 mg/m2 IV Day 1, Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneous Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for Cycles 1-6" (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Collected from day of first dose to 30 days after the last dose of study medication, a maximum of 18 weeks and 30 days after last study treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RashFatigueThrombocytopeniaLeukopeniaNauseaDiarrheaEdemaHyperglycemiaPeripheral NeuropathyNeutropeniaHypoalbuminemiaConstipationHypocalcemiaPain in ExtremityAnemiaCoughFeverDehydrationPruritusDyspneaHyponatremiaInsomniaAbdominal PainDizzinessHypokalemiaWeight LossAnorexiaErythemaHypomagnesemiaAllergic ReactionChillsHyperhidrosisMyalgiaHeadacheMucositisHypoglycemia
Phase II - Lenalidomide 10mg PO QD19181613121111111010109998887777666665555554444

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR) of Previously Treated and Previously Untreated Participants

Measured from the documented beginning of response (CR or PR) to the time of relapse. This is measured in responders per Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al. 2007.) CR: complete disappearance of detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; PR: 50% or greater decrease in sum of product of diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen, no new disease sites, patients with CR and persistent morphologic bone marrow involvement. (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) after discontinuation of study treatment for 2 years or until documented disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Previously Treated Participants17.94
Previously Untreated Participants21.09

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Lenalidomide Combined With Bortezomib and Rituximab in Phase I Participants

"Determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide combined with bortezomib and rituximab, defined as the highest dose at which ≤1 of 6 patients experiences a dose-limiting toxicity according to the NCI CTCAE v. 4.03.~MTD of Lenalidomide was tested, included with 1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneous (D1, 4, 8, 11) bortezomib, 375 mg/m2 (D1, 8, 15 of Cycle 1, D1 on subsequent cycles) rituximab.~Three dose limiting toxicities were reported in two patients (grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 neuropathy, grade 3 rash)" (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Collected from day of first dose to the end of the first treatment cycle, up to 21 days

Interventionmg lenalidomide, orally, daily, day 1-14 (Number)
Phase I Participants (10 mg/15 mg Lenalidomide)10

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR) of Phase I and Phase II Participants

"Measured from the documented beginning of response (CR or PR) to the time of relapse. This is measured in responders per Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al. 2007.) CR: complete disappearance of detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; PR: 50% or greater decrease in sum of product of diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses, no increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen, no new disease sites, patients with CR and persistent morphologic bone marrow involvement.~Duration of Response will be examined using time-to-event analysis methods. Kaplan-Meier figures will be generated and the log-rank test will be used to examine differences existing between various levels of stratification." (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 3 months (+/- 2 weeks) after discontinuation of study treatment for 2 years or until documented disease progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I Participants (10 mg/15 mg Lenalidomide)25.72
Phase II Participants (10 mg Lenalidomide)17.81

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) of Phase I and Phase II Participants

Response to treatment (Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)) determined using Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson et al. 2007.) CR: complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms; PR: 50% or greater decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or extranodal masses, no increase in the size of other nodes, liver or spleen, no new sites of disease, patients who achieve CR but have persistent morphologic bone marrow involvement; Stable Disease (SD): failing to attain PR or CR, but not fulfilling criteria for progressive disease; Progressive Disease (PD)/Relapse: appearance of new lesions more than 1.5 cm in any axis, 50% or greater increase from nadir SPD of any previously involved sites, 50% or greater increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in short axis. (NCT00633594)
Timeframe: Every 6 weeks until treatment discontinuation then every 3 months thereafter, projected average 24 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I Participants (10 mg/15 mg Lenalidomide)12
Phase II Participants (10 mg Lenalidomide)21

[back to top]

Maximal Tolerated Doses of Bortezomib and Vincristine When Used in Combination of Bortezomib, Rituximab and the CHOP Chemotherapy Regimen (Phase I)

INDUCTION: Patients receive bortezomib IV on days 1 and 8; rituximab IV, doxorubicin hydrochloride IV over 3-5 minutes, cyclophosphamide IV over 60 minutes, and vincristine sulfate IV over 10 minutes on day 1; and prednisone PO on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 21 days for up to 8 courses in the absence of disease progression. (NCT00634179)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 for MTD, following completion of therapy for CR, up to 24 weeks

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
MTD of Bortezomib With Vincristine Capped at 1.5 mg1.62

[back to top]

An Estimate of the Overall Response Rate (ORR)(Complete Response [CR] + CR Unconfirmed [CRu] + Partial Response [PR]) to Bortezomib and Rituximab (VR)-CHOP According to International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria (IWRC) Criteria

Response was assessed by computerized tomography (CT) after every 2 cycles of induction therapy, one time at least 4 weeks after completing induction (i.e., prior to maintenance), and then every 3 months while on maintenance therapy. At the conclusion of maintenance therapy, patients underwent one post-treatment scan, with further scans completed at the discretion of the treating physician. Positron emission tomography was permitted but only CT measurements were used to determine response. (NCT00634179)
Timeframe: Following completion of therapy, up to 2 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Phase I: Induction13619
Phase II: Maintenance191029

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Response

Response is assessed by investigator according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Complete response requires disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT00636792)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last subject completes their end of treatment visit.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
VELCADE, Bendamustine, Rituximab (VBR) Treatment32

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response (Complete and Partial Response)

Response is assessed by investigator according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Complete response requires disappearance of all evidence of disease. Partial response requires regression of measurable disease and no new sites. (NCT00636792)
Timeframe: 12 weeks after the last subject completes their end of treatment visit

Interventionparticipants (Number)
VELCADE, Bendamustine, Rituximab (VBR) Treatment53

[back to top]

Proportion of Confirmed Tumor Response Defined as an Objective Status of Confirmed Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Regression (REGR) on Two Consecutive Evaluations

"Confidence intervals for the true proportion will be calculated using the exact binomial method.~Measurable patients must achieve at least a 50% reduction in the product of perpendicular diameters of contrast enhancement or mass with no new lesions with the patient being on stable or decreased steroid dose.~Evaluable patients must achieve unequivocal reduction in size of contrast-enhancement or decrease in mass effect as agreed upon independently by primary physician and quality control physicians; no new lesions. Patient should be on stable or decreased steroid dose." (NCT00641706)
Timeframe: Assessed up to 5 years

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (Not Undergoing Surgery)0.027

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Patients who died were considered to have disease progression at the time of death unless there was documented evidence that no progression occurred before death. For patients with bidimensionally measurable disease (measurable disease), progression is defined as > 25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of contrast enhancement or mass or appearance of new lesions. For patients without bidimensionally measurable disease (evaluable disease), progression is defined as unequivocal increase in size of contrast enhancement or increase in mass effect as agreed upon independently by primary physician and quality control physicians or appearance of new lesions. (NCT00641706)
Timeframe: From study registration to date of progression (up to 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Not Undergoing Surgery)1.5
Arm B (Undergoing Surgery)4.2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 6 Months

Estimated using the Binomial point estimator (number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients). A patient is classified as a success if alive and progression-free at 6 months. For patients with bidimensionally measurable disease (measurable disease), progression is defined as > 25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of contrast enhancement or mass or appearance of new lesions. For patients without bidimensionally measurable disease (evaluable disease), progression is defined as unequivocal increase in size of contrast enhancement or increase in mass effect as agreed upon independently by primary physician and quality control physicians or appearance of new lesions. (NCT00641706)
Timeframe: At 6 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A (Not Undergoing Surgery)0
Arm B (Undergoing Surgery)29

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curve. (NCT00641706)
Timeframe: From study registration to date of death due to any cause or last follow-up (up to 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm A (Not Undergoing Surgery)3.2
Arm B (Undergoing Surgery)8.7

[back to top]

Response Rates ()

The response rate was calculated as the number of patients with documented confirmed partial response (PR) or better, which includes confirmed/unconfirmed stringent complete response (sCR), confirmed/unconfirmed complete response (CR), confirmed/unconfirmed very good partial response (VGPR), or confirmed partial response (PR), as best response divided by the total number of evaluable patients, in each arm. Patients with measurable disease, as defined in the protocol, are evaluable. Response rates were compared between the two treatment arms using a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Response designations were based on the International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma. Due to the complexity of these criteria, the details of these criteria have been omitted. (NCT00644228)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide)153
Arm II (Dexamethasone, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib)176

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Unstratified median progression-free survival in months. (NCT00644228)
Timeframe: From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 6 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm I (Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide)30
Arm II (Dexamethasone, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib)43

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Unstratified median overall survival in months. (NCT00644228)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Arm I (Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide)64
Arm II (Dexamethasone, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib)75

[back to top]

Dose Limiting Toxicity

Number of participants with dose limiting toxicity. (NCT00666588)
Timeframe: During Course 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2-assess Efficacy-low Anthracycline Exposure0
Bortezomib 1.0mg/m2-assess Feasibility High Anthracycline Exp1
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2-assess Feasibility High Anthracycline Exp0
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2-assess Efficacy High Anthracycline Exp0

[back to top]

NF-kB Activity by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

NF-kB activity will be measured as a continuous variable (ng NF-kB/Mg protein). Differences in NF-κB activity between time points will be assessed using summary statistics such as mean, standard deviation, and range. We may perform exploratory analyses to determine if single time point measurements, or the difference between time points, correlate with treatment response. (NCT00666588)
Timeframe: At baseline, prior to and up to 24 hours after bortezomib treatment

,,,
Interventionng/Mg protein (Mean)
Baseline24 Hrs after treatment
Bortezomib 1.0mg/m2-assess Feasibility High Anthracycline Exp655.4345.46
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2-assess Efficacy High Anthracycline Exp408.144497.31
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2-assess Feasibility High Anthracycline Exp974.66855.96
Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2-assess Efficacy-low Anthracycline Exposure718.218774.1925

[back to top]

Feasibility of Stem Cell Quantitation: Percentage of Leukemia Initiation Cells (LIC) Depletion

Descriptive statistics to assess mean +/- standard deviation for the percentage leukemia initiation cells (LIC) depletion. (NCT00666588)
Timeframe: At baseline and after completion of course 1

,,
Interventionpercentage of LIC depletion (Mean)
Prior to TreatmentPost Treatment
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2-assess Efficacy High Anthracycline Exp1.63850.0435
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2-assess Feasibility High Anthracycline Exp0.20.43
Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2-assess Efficacy-low Anthracycline Exposure0.0136670.021

[back to top]

Overall Response (Complete Remission [CR] and CR With Partial Recovery [CRp]) During Course 1

Overall response (complete remission [CR] and CR with partial recovery [CRp]) during course 1. (NCT00666588)
Timeframe: After course 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2-assess Efficacy-low Anthracycline Exposure4
Bortezomib 1.0mg/m2-assess Feasibility High Anthracycline Exp2
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2-assess Feasibility High Anthracycline Exp2
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2-assess Efficacy High Anthracycline Exp9

[back to top]

Proteasome Inhibition Activity

Mean and standard deviation of β1 and β5- Results are ratios (proteasome subunit/β-actin based on loading of 15 µg total protein, normalized to CEM). (NCT00666588)
Timeframe: At baseline

,,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Baseline β1Baseline β5
Bortezomib 1.0mg/m2-assess Feasibility High Anthracycline Exp0.78940.2576
Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2-assess Efficacy High Anthracycline Exp0.28951430.3721286
Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2-assess Efficacy-low Anthracycline Exposure0.081150.121575

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of response, defined only among the responders, is measured from start of achieving Partial Response (PR) [first observation of PR before confirmation] to the time of disease progression, with deaths owing to causes other than progression not counted as events, but censored (Durie et al., 2006). Duration of response will be estimated and plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. The median will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT00691704)
Timeframe: 6 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
High-risk Multiple Myeloma11

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) is defined for all subjects as the time from the date of initiation of treatment to the date of first documentation of relapse, progression, or death due to any cause. Full restaging was performed at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 months). PFS survival will be estimated and plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. The median will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT00691704)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
PFS at 2 yearsPFS at 1 year
High-risk Multiple Myeloma39

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response will be measured in the population of subjects with a confirmed response as the time from the date of initiation of treatment to the date of the first documentation of a confirmed response. Full restaging was performed at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 months). Time to response will be estimated and plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. The median will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT00691704)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
High-risk Multiple Myeloma2

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to progression (TTP) is defined for all patients as the time from initiation of treatment to disease progression with deaths owing to causes other than progression not counted as events, but censored (Durie et al., 2006). (NCT00691704)
Timeframe: 6 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
High-risk Multiple Myeloma11

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of initiation of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Overall response rate will be estimated with its 80% confidence interval, and the numbers of subjects achieving a sustained complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) will be tabulated. Overall survival will be estimated and plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method. The median will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals. (NCT00691704)
Timeframe: 6 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
High-risk Multiple Myeloma36

[back to top]

Best Response

Number of participants per category: Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD). PR: Regression of measurable disease and no new sites. SD: Failure to attain Complete Response (CR), /PR or PD. Relapsed or Progressive Disease: Any new lesion or increase by ≥ 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT00703664)
Timeframe: Up to 9 years

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
Cohort A - MCL757
Cohort B - MCL022
Cohort C - DLBCL3823

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Median progression-free survival in months per cohort. (NCT00703664)
Timeframe: Up to 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort A - MCL7.6
Cohort C - DLBCL1.8

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR: Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) assessed according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. (NCT00703664)
Timeframe: Up to 9 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cohort A - MCL31.8
Cohort B - MCL0
Cohort C - DLBCL7.7

[back to top]

Duration of Stable Disease

Median duration of stable disease per cohort. (NCT00703664)
Timeframe: Up to 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort A - MCL3.8
Cohort B - MCL3.8
Cohort C - DLBCL1.3

[back to top]

Duration of Partial Response

Median duration of response per cohort. (NCT00703664)
Timeframe: Up to 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Cohort A - MCL4.2
Cohort C - DLBCL2.1

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined for all evaluable patients who have achieved an objective response as the date at which the patient's earliest objective status is first noted to be either a CR or PR to the earliest date progression is documented. MR for Waldenstrom lymphoma will not be included as a response. Median duration of response and the confidence interval for the median duration will be computed. (NCT00711828)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment25.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00711828)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment54.8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival time is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. Progression is defines as having any new lesion or increase by 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. The distribution of progression-free survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00711828)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment11.6

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

Time to treatment failure is defined to be the time from registration to the date at which the patient is removed from treatment due to progression, adverse events, or refusal. If the patient is considered to be a major treatment violation or is taken off study as a non-protocol failure, the patient will be censored on the date they are removed from treatment. The distribution of time to treatment failure will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00711828)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years from registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment6.6

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Adverse events were assessed according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 3.0 after each cycle of treatment. The maximum grade for each type of adverse event were recorded for each patient, and frequency tables were reviewed to determine patterns. For this endpoint, the number of patients receiving a Grade 3, Grade 4, or Grade 5 as their highest reported grade regardless of attribution are reported. A full list of adverse events are reported in the Adverse Events section of this report. (NCT00711828)
Timeframe: up to 12 cycles (28 days per cycle) of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Treatment1980

[back to top]

Proportion of Responses (Complete Response or Partial Response)

A response is defined to be a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) noted as the objective status on any evaluation (i.e., best response). The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. A confidence interval for the true success proportion will be calculated according to the properties of the binomial distribution. (NCT00711828)
Timeframe: up to 12 cycles

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)
Treatment19.042.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced at Least One Serious Adverse Event

(NCT00715208)
Timeframe: From completion of informed consent through 30 days after the last dose of study drug

Interventionparticipants (Number)
VELCADE R-CAP2
VELCADE R-CP12

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 1 Year

PFS was defined as the time from the first dose to the date of progressive disease (PD)/relapse or death, whichever comes first. For a participant who had not progressed/relapsed or died, PFS was censored at the last response assessment that was stable disease (failure to attain complete response/partial response or PD or better). (NCT00715208)
Timeframe: Assessed at at the end of Cycle 2, at end of treatment visit, and every 12± 1 weeks for the first year (4 visits) until PD

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VELCADE R-CAP67
VELCADE R-CP63

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Complete Response (CR)

Disappearance of all evidence of disease assessed by computed tomography (CT) and PET (position-emission tomography) according to the revised International Working Group (IWG) Criteria. (NCT00715208)
Timeframe: 30 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
VELCADE R-CAP1
VELCADE R-CP13

[back to top]

Duration of Response

"Time (in months) from the first documentation of a response (CR or partial response [PR]) to the date of first documentation of progressive disease or relapse from complete response.~CR is defined as disappearance of all evidence of disease assessed by CT or PET; PR is defined as regression of measurable disease and no new sites assessed by CT or PET according to the revised International Working Group (IWG) Criteria." (NCT00715208)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
VELCADE R-CP21.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR)

"OR = Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR)according to the revised International Working Group (IWG) Criteria.~CR is the disappearance of all evidence of disease assessed by CT and PET. PR is the regression of measurable disease and no new sites assessed by CT and PET." (NCT00715208)
Timeframe: 30 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
VELCADE R-CAP6
VELCADE R-CP37

[back to top]

Number of Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) Incidents (Phase I)

DLT was defined as any events that is determined to be possibly, probably, or definitely related to the combination of bortezomib and GX15-070 (as determined by the investigator) and occurring during the first cycle of treatment, irrespective of whether the toxicity resolved. Hematologic DLT measures were assessed using the continuous variables as the outcome measures (primarily nadir and percent change from baseline values) as well as categorization via Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3 standard toxicity grading. (NCT00719901)
Timeframe: Up to 21 days of every first course

InterventionToxicity Incidents (Number)
Treatment (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)4

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Have at Least a Partial Response (Phase I)

In order to be classified as a hematologic response, confirmation of serum monoclonal protein, serum immunoglobulin free light chain (when primary determinant of response) and urine monoclonal protein (when primary determinant of response) results must be made by verification on two consecutive determinations. (NCT00719901)
Timeframe: From baseline to up to 3 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)4

[back to top]

Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug, whether or not considered drug related. AEs were collected from the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug. Treatment was administered for up to 8 cycles (24 weeks) and AEs were collected for up to 30 days following the last dose of study drug. (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Up to 107.4 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
R-CHOP239
VcR-CAP240

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time to progression was defined as the duration from the date of randomization until the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PD) or date of relapse for subjects who experienced complete response (CR) or complete response, unconfirmed (CRu). PD and response were based on the assessment of an Independent Review Committee. (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up of 40 months

InterventionDays (Median)
R-CHOP490.0
VcR-CAP929.0

[back to top]

Treatment-free Interval (TFI)

The TFI was defined as the duration from the date of last dose plus 1 day to the start date of the new treatment. Death due to disease progression prior to subsequent therapy was considered as an event. Otherwise, treatment-free interval was censored at the date of death or the last date known to be alive. (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up of 40 months

InterventionDays (Median)
R-CHOP624.0
VcR-CAP1236.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

The duration of treatment response was defined as the time from the date of the first response to the date of PD or death due to PD for those participants with a best response of CR, CRu, or PR as determined by the Independent Review Committee. The duration of response for complete responders was defined as the time from the date of the first response to the date of PD or death due to PD for those participants with a best response of CR or CRu verified by bone marrow and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up of 40 months

,
InterventionDays (Median)
Duration of responseDuration for Complete responders
R-CHOP459.0563.0
VcR-CAP1110.01282.0

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of progressive disease (PD) or death, whichever occurred first. PD was based on the assessment of an Independent Review Committee. (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up of 40 months

InterventionDays (Median)
R-CHOP437.0
VcR-CAP751.0

[back to top]

Overall Complete Response (CR + CRu)

Overall complete response was defined as the number of participants with complete response (CR) and those with unconfirmed complete response (CRu). Response assessment was carried out every 6 weeks for 18 weeks; thereafter, every 8 weeks until PD/initiation of alternate therapy/withdrawal from study/death. (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up of 40 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Overall complete responseCRCRu
R-CHOP957916
VcR-CAP12210616

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) in Long Term Follow-up Period

OS was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death. If the participant was alive or the vital status was unknown, OS was censored at the date that the subject was last known to be alive. (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Up to 107.4 months

InterventionDays (Median)
R-CHOP1695.0
VcR-CAP2760.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death. If the participant was alive or the vital status was unknown, OS was censored at the date that the subject was last known to be alive. (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up of 40 months

InterventionDays (Median)
R-CHOP1714.0
VcR-CAPNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as complete response (CR) + complete response, unconfirmed (CRu) + partial response (PR) as determined by the Independent Review Committee. Response assessment was carried out every 6 weeks for 18 weeks; thereafter, every 8 weeks until PD/initiation of alternate therapy/withdrawal from study/death. (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up of 40 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
R-CHOP204
VcR-CAP211

[back to top]

18-Month Survival

18-month survival was defined as the estimated probability of survival at 18 months (Kaplan-Meier estimate). (NCT00722137)
Timeframe: Up to month 18 from the time of randomization

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Mean)
R-CHOP83.8
VcR-CAP84.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Overall Response (Complete Response + Partial Response)

"Disease response was measured according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria with the addition of the response categories of nCR and VGPR.~Complete response requires disappearance of monoclonal protein from the blood and urine and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow on at least 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks.~Partial Response requires ≥50% reduction in serum m-protein for at least 2 determinations at least 6 weeks apart and if present, reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion by either ≥90% or to <200 mg" (NCT00722566)
Timeframe: Over 4 cycles (prior to the addition of dexamethasone)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
VELCADE Subcutaneuous61
VELCADE Intravenous31

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Complete Response

"Disease response was measured according to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria with the addition of the response categories of nCR and VGPR.~Complete response requires disappearance of monoclonal protein from the blood and urine and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow on at least 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks." (NCT00722566)
Timeframe: Over 4 cycles (prior to the addition of dexamethasone)

InterventionParticipants (Number)
VELCADE Subcutaneous9
VELCADE Intravenous6

[back to top]

Response to Bortezomib Monotherapy

Response to treatment with Bortezomib (BTZ) alone was defined as a reduction in serum Donor Specific Alloantibody (DSA) levels following treatment. DSA levels were measured prior to treatment and after treatment. A good response occurred if all DSA were reduced. A partial response when a reduction was observed in at least one DSA, but not all DSA. No response occurred when no reduction of any DSA was attained. (NCT00722722)
Timeframe: 6 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Good ResponsePartial ResponseNo Response
16 Dose Group014
32 Dose Group063
4 Dose Group012

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients That Achieved Partial or Complete Response to Treatment.

"Partial Response:~50% reduction in the level of serum monoclonal protein for at least two determinations six weeks apart.~If present, reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion by either, greater than or equal to 90%, or to <200 mg for at least two determinations six weeks apart.~50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas (by clinical or radiographic examination) for at least six weeks.~No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions (development of compression fracture does not exclude response).~Complete Response:~Disappearance of the original monoclonal protein from the blood and urine on at least two determinations for a minimum of six weeks.~<5% plasma cells in the bone marrow on at least two determinations for a minimum of six weeks.~No increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions." (NCT00724568)
Timeframe: 24 weeks (8, 21-day cycles)

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Combination Drug Therapy96

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Combination Therapy With VELCADE, Dexamethasone, and Doxil, (RVDD)

"Dose Level 1:~15 mg Revlimid daily on days 1-14 followed by 7-day rest every 21 days 1.3 mg/m2 Velcade daily on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 20 mg dexamethasone daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12* and 20 mg/m2 Doxil daily on day 4~Dose Level 2:~20 mg Revlimid daily on days 1-14 followed by 7-day rest every 21 days 1.3 mg/m2 Velcade daily on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 20 mg dexamethasone daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12* and 20 mg/m2 Doxil daily on day 4~Dose Level 3:~25 mg Revlimid daily on days 1-14 followed by 7-day rest every 21 days 1.3 mg/m2 Velcade daily on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 20 mg dexamethasone daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12* and 20 mg/m2 Doxil daily on day 4~Dose Level 4:~25 mg Revlimid daily on days 1-14 followed by 7-day rest every 21 days 1.3 mg/m2 Velcade daily on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 20 mg dexamethasone daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12* and 30 mg/m2 Doxil daily on day 4" (NCT00724568)
Timeframe: 1 month post treatment

Interventionmg (Number)
RevlimidVELCADEDexamethasoneDoxil
Combination Drug Therapy251.32030

[back to top]

Response

Overall response rate equals complete response and partial response per Southwest Oncology Group Criteria. Measurable, quantifiable protein criteria must be present. Acceptable protein criteria are quantitative immunoglobulin IgG, IgA, IgD, IgE or IgM and/or urine M-component (Bence-Jones protein). If both are present, the quantitative immunoglobulin will be followed for response. Complete Remission: The absence of bone marrow or blood findings of multiple myeloma. This includes disappearance of all evidence of serum and urine M-components on electrophoresis as by immunofixation studies. There must also be no evidence of increasing anemia. Partial Remission: A 50-74% reduction in the quantitative immunoglobulin, and if present, a 50-89% reduction in the urine M-component (Bence-Jones protein). Stable/No Remission): A <50% reduction I nthe quantitative immunoglobulin, or if the patient has light-chain disease only, a <50% reduction in the urine M-component (Bence-Jones protein. (NCT00734149)
Timeframe: 6 weeks following completion of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib+Melphalan+Prednisone42

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Any Grade or Severe Adverse Event

Number of patients with any grade or severe, defined as ≥ grade 3 by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0, adverse events as a measure of safety (NCT00734149)
Timeframe: At any time during the study and up to 30 days after stopping the study drug

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib+Melphalan+Prednisone34

[back to top]

Median Duration of Response

Duration of response is measured from date of first confirmed response until date of disease progression. (NCT00734149)
Timeframe: up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib+Melphalan+Prednisone: Non-ASCT19.8
Bortezomib+Melphalan+Prednisone: ASCT27.9

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival

Disease-free survival (DFS) was measured as the interval from achievement of CR until relapse or death, regardless of cause. DFS was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00742625)
Timeframe: Duration of study (up to 10 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib + Daunorubicin + Cytarabine8

[back to top]

Participants Experiencing a Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) of Bortezomib When Administered in Combination With Intermediate-dose Cytarabine

"DLTs were considered only during the first cycle of consolidation therapy and included grade 3 or 4 sensory or autonomic neuropathy, persistent grade 4 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia at day 42 in the absence of AML,any grade 4 or 5 nonhematologic toxicity, and any grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity (excluding neuropathy and toxicities secondary to neutropenia and sepsis) that did not resolve to grade 2 by day 42 unless attributable to persistent or recurrent AML. Grade 4 anorexia (requiring total parenteral nutrition) and grade 4 fatigue (requiring bed rest) were not considered DLTs.~Toxicity was graded per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Grading scale is as follows: grade 1: mild; grade 2: moderate; grade 3: Severe; grade 4: Life Threatening; grade 5: Death." (NCT00742625)
Timeframe: during consolidation cycle 1 (42 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib (0.7 mg/m^2) + Int-DAC0
Bortezomib (1.0 mg/m^2) + Int-DAC0
Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m^2) + Int-DAC1

[back to top]

Remission Induction Response

"Response was calculated according to Revised International Working Group (IWG) criteria for Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)~A response was defined as the portion of participants who achieved a complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete platelet recovery(CRp) during induction.~A CR is defined as those with > 20% cellularity of bone marrow biopsy, no presence of extramedullary leukemia for AML, <5 % myeloblast cells for bone marrow with peripheral blood and normal complete blood count (absolute neutrophils > 1000 mL and platelets >= 100,000 mL).~A CRp is defined as a CR except platelets < 100,000 mL without need for transfusion." (NCT00742625)
Timeframe: 2 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete responseComplete response with incomplete platelet recover
Bortezomib + Daunorubicin + Cytarabine624

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) as the interval from the on-study date until death. OS was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT00742625)
Timeframe: Duration of study (up to 10 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib + Daunorubicin + Cytarabine12

[back to top]

Phase II: Two Year Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival by disease risk stratification after CVDD. OS: time from initiation of therapy until death from any cause. (NCT00750815)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
High-Risk Myeloma88.9
Standard-Risk Myeloma91.1

[back to top]

Phase II: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

"Progression-free survival after CVDD in participants with newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma. PFS: time from the initiation of therapy to progression, relapse or death from any causes.~Progressive Disease (PD): Progressive Disease requires any one or more of the following:~Increase of ≥ 25% from baseline in:~serum M-component and /or (the absolute increase must be ≥ 0.5 g/dL)~urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be ≥ 200 mg/24 h)" (NCT00750815)
Timeframe: Up to 50.9 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
All Participants31.3

[back to top]

Phase I - Maximum Planned Dose (MPD) Level

"Maximum Phase II planned dose of cyclophosphamide when given in combination with bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (CVDD) in participants with newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma. Dose levels 1, 2, 3, 4 as outlined in Treatment Arm A.~If no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reported in the first 3 participants at a dose level, that dose level was to be considered safe and 3 participants would be enrolled at the next dose level. If 1/3 participants in a cohort at a dose level had dose limiting toxicity (DLT), the dose level would be expanded to obtain 6 evaluable participants. MPD reflects the highest dose of drug that did not cause a DLT in 33% of participants." (NCT00750815)
Timeframe: 9 months

InterventionDosing Level (Number)
A. Phase I Dose Escalation4

[back to top]

Phase II: Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Best response to CVDD chemotherapy. Overall Response: Partial Response (PR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) + Complete Response (CR). PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hours; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein with urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours; CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT00750815)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with Partial ResponseParticipants with Very Good Partial ResponseParticipants with Complete Response
All Participants162315

[back to top]

Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Counts of participants with TEAEs, and subset by relation to drug, grade of severity, serious, TEAEs leading to discontinuation or leading to death. AEs were graded for severity according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTCAE), V 3.0: Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe (prevents normal everyday activities); Grade 4: Life-threatening or disabling; Grade 5: Death. (NCT00765102)
Timeframe: up to 9 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
At least 1 TEAEAt least 1 drug-related TEAEAt least 1 Romidepsin-related TEAEAt least 1 Bortezomib-related TEAEAt least 1 >=Grade 3 TEAEAt least 1 Grade 4 TEAEAt least 1 serious TEAEAt least 1 TEAE leading to discontinuationAt least 1 TEAE leading to death
Romidepsin + Bortezomib323028302851462

[back to top]

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-∞)

AUC (0 - ∞) = Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞) of Romidepsin based on plasma samples. (NCT00765102)
Timeframe: Day 1 (cycle 1): 1 hour prior to romidepsin administration, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours after initiation of romidepsin infusion

Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Romidepsin 8 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib1209.1
Romidepsin 10 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib1149.5

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax)

Maximum observed concentration of Romidepsin (NCT00765102)
Timeframe: Day 1 (cycle 1): 1 hour prior to romidepsin administration, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours after initiation of romidepsin infusion

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Romidepsin 8 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib913.9
Romidepsin 10 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib1002.7

[back to top]

Terminal Half-life (t1/2)

Terminal half-life of Romidepsin (NCT00765102)
Timeframe: Day 1 (cycle 1): 1 hour prior to romidepsin administration, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours after initiation of romidepsin infusion

Interventionhr (Geometric Mean)
Romidepsin 8 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib4.1
Romidepsin 10 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib3.6

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax)

Time to maximum observed concentration of Romidepsin (NCT00765102)
Timeframe: Day 1 (cycle 1): 1 hour prior to romidepsin administration, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours after initiation of romidepsin infusion

Interventionhr (Median)
Romidepsin 8 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib1.04
Romidepsin 10 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib0.58

[back to top]

Total Clearance (CL)

Total clearance of Romidepsin (NCT00765102)
Timeframe: Day 1 (cycle 1): 1 hour prior to romidepsin administration, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours after initiation of romidepsin infusion

InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Romidepsin 8 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib11.3
Romidepsin 10 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib16.4

[back to top]

Total Volume of Distribution (Vz)

Total volume of distribution of Romidepsin (NCT00765102)
Timeframe: Day 1 (cycle 1): 1 hour prior to romidepsin administration, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 24 hours after initiation of romidepsin infusion

InterventionL (Geometric Mean)
Romidepsin 8 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib66.5
Romidepsin 10 mg/m^2 + Bortezomib85.9

[back to top]

Number of Patients in Each Group With Any of the Following: Rejection Reversal or Recurrent Rejection

"Rejection Reversal is a return of serum creatinine to within 115% of the baseline value, or histologic reversal occurring within 14 days of initiation of treatment.~Recurrent Rejection is histologic evidence of rejection noted on a biopsy specimen obtained up to 3 months after documented rejection reversal." (NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 1 year

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rejection RecurrenceRejection Reversal
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)02
RATG/Bortezomib01
RATG/Rituximab01

[back to top]

Mean Serum Creatinine

Renal allograft function as determined by change (∆) in Calculated creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault at 7, 14, 28, 60, and 90 days and 1 year post therapy initiation (NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 7, 14, 28, 60, 90 days and 1 year post therapy initiation

,,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
7 days14 days28 days60 days90 days1 year
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)3.043.252.92.622.482.19
RATG/Bortezomib2.312.202.182.382.132.87
RATG/Rituximab2.322.352.352.322.122.07

[back to top]

Renal Allograft Survival

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 1 year after rejection treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)7
RATG/Rituximab7
RATG/Bortezomib10

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Allografts With C4d Focal Positive Pretreatment Biopsy

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: Day 1

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)2
RATG/Rituximab2
RATG/Bortezomib4

[back to top]

Incidence of Post Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD)

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)0
RATG/Rituximab0
RATG/Bortezomib0

[back to top]

Incidence of Death

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 90 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)0
RATG/Rituximab0
RATG/Bortezomib0

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Allografts With C4d Diffuse Positive Pretreatment Biopsy

(NCT00771875)
Timeframe: 90 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)3
RATG/Rituximab3
RATG/Bortezomib5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) will be measured as the time from date of enrollment to death from any cause. For patients who remain alive, survival time will be censored at the date of last contact. (NCT00772668)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Number)
RCVELPNA

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression free-survival will be assessed according to according to the International Workshop Criteria (IWC). Progression-free survival will be measured as the time from date of enrollment to relapse, progression or death due to follicular lymphoma (FL) or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), whichever occurs first. Participants who do not experience relapse or progression, and those who die from causes other than cancer, will be censored at the date of last contact. (NCT00772668)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Number)
RCVELPNA

[back to top]

Rate of Toxicity in Study Participants

Safety and tolerance to protocol therapy as evidenced by the rate of toxicity (serious adverse events and study-related adverse events) in study participants (NCT00772668)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
RCVELP1

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival was measured from the start of the treatment to death due to any cause. Overall Survival is represented as the number of deaths per 100-person- months and was computed by dividing the number of participants with an event of death that occurred during the study follow-up period by the total duration of follow-up (in 100 months) for all the participants in each cohort since participants had different lengths of follow-up. (NCT00773747)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 32 months (final study analysis)

InterventionEvents/100-person Months (Number)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib1.7
Placebo + Bortezomib1.9

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

Objective response rate was measured as the proportion of patients who achieved a confirmed partial response or better during the course of the study. Response to study therapy was assessed using EBMT Criteria and confirmed by Independent Adjudication Review. (NCT00773747)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the end of each 21-day Cycle assessed up to 32 months (final study analysis)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib56.2
Placebo + Bortezomib40.6

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was measured from the start of the treatment to the time when the criteria for progression was met or death due to any cause (whichever is first recorded). Response to study therapy was assessed using European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (EBMT) Criteria. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used with Efron's likelihood approximation to account for ties in event times. (NCT00773747)
Timeframe: From randomization to event of disease progression or death assessed up to 32 months (final study analysis)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib7.63
Placebo + Bortezomib6.83

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to progression was measured from the start of the treatment to the time when the criteria for progression was met or death due to myeloma (whichever is first recorded). Response to study therapy was assessed using European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (EBMT) Criteria. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used with Efron's likelihood approximation to account for ties in event times. (NCT00773747)
Timeframe: Baseline and at the end of each 21-day Cycle assessed up to 32 months (final study analysis)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib7.73
Placebo + Bortezomib7.03

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3-5 Clinical or Laboratory Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product/protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition temporally associated with the use of the product was also an AE. Grades come from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Per protocol, clinical and laboratory AEs are presented as a combined total for each grade. (NCT00773747)
Timeframe: Up to 722 days

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Placebo + Bortezomib2408517
Vorinostat + Bortezomib27210811

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (RR)

Objective RR was defined as percentage (%) of participants with complete response (CR: disappearance of original monoclonal (M) paraprotein from blood & urine on at least 2 determinations for at least 6 weeks (WKs) by immunofixation studies, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow on at least 1 determination, no increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions (LBLs) & disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas (STP) for at least 6 WKs on skeletal survey (SS) if available) or partial response (PR: ≥50% reduction in serum M protein for at least 2 determinations 6 WKs apart, if present, reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion by ≥90% or ≤200 mg for at least 2 determinations 6 WKs apart, ≥50% reduction in STP size for at least 6 WKs, & no increase in size/number of LBLs on SS if available) as assessed by Independent Adjudication Committee (IAC) per European Blood & Marrow Transplant (EBMT) criteria. To report RR & 95% confidence intervals (CIs), exact test of binomial parameter was used. (NCT00773838)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 30 months (through Final Analysis data cut-off of 16-May-2011)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib11.3

[back to top]

TTP as Assessed by Investigator Per EBMT Criteria

TTP was defined as the time from allocation to the first documented PD as assessed by investigator per EBMT criteria or death due to myeloma, whichever occurred first. PD: >25% increase in level of serum Mparaprotein, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 5g/L (500 mg/dL) and confirmed on a repeat investigation or 25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 200mg/24hour and confirmed on a repeat investigation or >25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 10% or definitive increase in size of existing LBLs or STP or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause). To report the median TTP (in months) and associated 95% CIs Kaplan-Meier method was used. (NCT00773838)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 30 months (through Final Analysis data cut-off of 16-May-2011)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib3.07

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE were reported. (NCT00773838)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 18 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib28

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a preexisting condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an AE. The number of participants who experienced an AE were reported. (NCT00773838)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 22 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib142

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Determined by IAC Per EBMT Criteria

PFS was defined as the time from allocation to the first documents PD as determined by IAC per EBMT criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD: >25% increase in level of serum M-paraprotein, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 5g/L (500 mg/dL) and confirmed on a repeat investigation or 25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 200mg/24hour and confirmed on a repeat investigation or >25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 10% or definitive increase in size of existing LBLs or STP or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause). To report the median PFS (in months) and associated 95%CIs Kaplan-Meier method was used. (NCT00773838)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 30 months (through Final Analysis data cut-off of 16-May-2011)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib3.13

[back to top]

PFS as Assessed by Investigator Per EBMT Criteria

PFS was defined as the time from allocation to the first documents PD as assessed by investigator per EBMT criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD: >25% increase in level of serum M-paraprotein, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 5g/L (500 mg/dL) and confirmed on a repeat investigation or 25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 200mg/24hour and confirmed on a repeat investigation or >25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 10% or definitive increase in size of existing LBLs or STP or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause). To report the median PFS (in months) and associated 95%CIs Kaplan-Meier method was used. (NCT00773838)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 30 months (through Final Analysis data cut-off of 16-May-2011)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib2.83

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from allocation to death due to any cause. To report the median survival (in months) and the associated 95%CIs were reported using Kaplan-Meier method was used. Participants without documented death at the time of final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow up. (NCT00773838)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 40 months (through End of Trial data cut-off of 09-Apr-2012)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib11.23

[back to top]

Time To Disease Progression (TTP) as Determined by IAC Per EBMT Criteria

TTP was defined as the time from allocation to the first documented disease progression (PD) as determined by IAC per EBMT criteria or death due to myeloma, whichever occurred first. PD: >25% increase in level of serum Mparaprotein, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 5g/L (500 mg/dL) and confirmed on a repeat investigation or 25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 200mg/24hour and confirmed on a repeat investigation or >25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 10% or definitive increase in size of existing LBLs or STP or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause). To report the median TTP (in months) and associated 95% CIs Kaplan-Meier method was used. (NCT00773838)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 30 months (through Final Analysis data cut-off of 16-May-2011)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib3.47

[back to top]

Antibody-mediated Rejection by Banff '97 Criteria (Updated 2005)

"Antibody mediated rejection demonstrated to be due to, atleast in part, to anti-donor antibody at 6 months by Banff 97' criteria. Rejection due, at least in part, to documented anti-donor antibody ('suspicious for' if antibody not demonstrated); may coincide with categories 3, 4 and 5.~Grade I. ATN-like - C4d+, minimal inflammation Grade II. Capillary- margination and/or thromboses, C4d+ Grade III. Arterial - v3, C4d+" (NCT00782821)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)1
RATG/Rituxan0
RATG/Velcade3
RATG/Rituxan/Velcade1

[back to top]

Acute Cellular Rejection by Banff '97 Criteria (Updated 2005)

"Acute cellular rejection IA - cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).~IB - cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of severe tubulitis (>10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells) IIA - cases with mild to moderate intimal arteritis (v1) IIB - cases with server intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area (v2) III - case with transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medical smooth muscle cells (v3 with accompanying lymphoctic inflammation)" (NCT00782821)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)1
RATG/Rituxan0
RATG/Velcade1
RATG/Rituxan/Velcade0

[back to top]

Patient Allograft Survival at 12 Months

Patient's allograft was still functioning at 12 months post study enrollment (NCT00782821)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)10
RATG/Rituxan10
RATG/Velcade9
RATG/Rituxan/Velcade9

[back to top]

Incidence of Acute Rejection (Banff '97) or Antibody Mediated Rejection

"Antibody mediated rejection demonstrated to be due to, atleast in part, to anti-donor antibody at 6 months by Banff 97' criteria.~Acute rejection IA - cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of moderate tubulitis (>4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells).~IB - cases with significant interstitial infiltration (>25% of parenchyma affected) and foci of severe tubulitis (>10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells) IIA - cases with mild to moderate intimal arteritis (v1) IIB - cases with server intimal arteritis comprising >25% of the luminal area (v2) III - case with transmural arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medical smooth muscle cells (v3 with accompanying lymphoctic inflammation)" (NCT00782821)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)2
RATG/Rituxan0
RATG/Velcade5
RATG/Rituxan/Velcade3

[back to top]

Patient Survival at 12 Months

Patient was still alive 12 months post study enrollment. (NCT00782821)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (RATG)10
RATG/Rituxan10
RATG/Velcade10
RATG/Rituxan/Velcade9

[back to top]

The Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bortezomib (MTD)

The Maximum Tolerated Dose of Bortezomib (MTD) Will be Defined as the Dose Level Prior to That Resulting in Two Out of Six Patients Experiencing a DLT (NCT00784823)
Timeframe: During dosing of Bortezomib on Day -4 to Day -1 of ASCT

Interventionmg/m2 of bortezomib (Number)
Combined Dose Intense Melphalan With Bortezomib (MTD)1.6

[back to top]

Response Rate of the Combination of Bortezomib and Melphalan in Patients With AML and High-risk MDS.

Determine disease response to treatment using Cheson 2000 report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. (NCT00789256)
Timeframe: Post Cycle 1 through 28 days post-treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Strata 15
Strata 22

[back to top]

Number of Participants Surviving at 1 Year

(NCT00790647)
Timeframe: one year from transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stem Cell Transplantation With Bortezomib and Melphalan9

[back to top]

Number of Participants Surviving at 100 Days From Transplant

(NCT00790647)
Timeframe: 100 Days from transplant date

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stem Cell Transplant With Bortezomib and Melphalan9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematologic Response

"complete and partial hematologic response defined as: Complete response: absence of detectable monoclonal protein in serum and urine, and bone marrow biopsy <5% plasma cells with no clonal predominance of kappa or lambda isotype.~Partial response: any one of the following~For patients with detectable and quantifiable marrow plasmacytosis, a reduction of 50% or more in plasma cells as a percentage of nucleated bone marrow cells.~For patients with a detectable monoclonal peak on serum protein electropheresis or urine protein electropheresis, a reduction in the peak height of 50% or more.~For patients with quantifiable urinary kappa or lambda chain concentration, a reduction in daily light chain excretion (concentration x 24-hr urine volume)." (NCT00790647)
Timeframe: one year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stem Cell Transplant With Bortezomib and Melphalan6

[back to top]

Number of Participants Surviving at 2 Years

(NCT00790647)
Timeframe: 2 years from transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stem Cell Transplant With Bortezomib and Melphalan9

[back to top]

One Year Overall Survival

One year overall survival estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Defined as the percentage of patients alive at year one after starting treatment. (NCT00792142)
Timeframe: From date of treatment initiation until death from any cause, assessed up to one year.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Stem Cell Transplant, Maintenance Treatment)95

[back to top]

One Year Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"PFS estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Defined as the percentage of patients progression-free at year one after starting treatment.~International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria for disease progression:~Increase of > 25% from baseline in Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 0.5 g/dl); Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 200 mg/24 h; Only in patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels:~the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels. The absolute increase must be >l0mg/dl.~Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: the absolute % must be > 10%C; Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas.~or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dl or 2.65 mmol/l) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder." (NCT00792142)
Timeframe: From start of treatment initiation until disease progression, relapse or death from any cause, assessed up to 1 year.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Stem Cell Transplant, Maintenance Treatment)88

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

All grade 3 and above treatment-related adverse events (AEs) during bortezomib/dexamethasone treatment cycles. (NCT00792142)
Timeframe: After 4 months of maintenance therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
LeukopeniaLymphopeniaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaCataractFatigueUpper respiratory infectionAnxietyPain in extremitySinus bradycardiaHyperglycemiaHypophosphatemia
Treatment (Stem Cell Transplant, Maintenance Treatment)1132112111143

[back to top]

Number of Patients Surviving Overall

Number of subjects surviving two years post autologous transplant. (NCT00793572)
Timeframe: At 2 years after the autograft

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tandem Auto-/Nonmyeloablative Allo-HCT and Maintenance Therapy21

[back to top]

Number of Patients Surviving Progression-free

"Number of subjects surviving without progressive disease post-transplant.~Progressive disease criteria:~Greater than 25% increase in serum (absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL) or urine (absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24h) M proteins compared to best response status after autologous transplant.~Appearance of new lytic bone lesions or plasmacytomas." (NCT00793572)
Timeframe: At 2 years after the autograft

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tandem Auto-/Nonmyeloablative Allo-HCT and Maintenance Therapy14

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Chronic GVHD

Number of subjects with classic chronic or chronic extensive GVHD post allogeneic transplant. (NCT00793572)
Timeframe: 1 year post allo

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tandem Auto-/Nonmyeloablative Allo-HCT and Maintenance Therapy10

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patients With Non-relapse Mortality

Number of subjects with non-relapse mortalities post allogeneic transplant. (NCT00793572)
Timeframe: 200 and 365 days after allo

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
200 days post allo1 Year post allo
Tandem Auto-/Nonmyeloablative Allo-HCT and Maintenance Therapy11

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD

"Number of patients who developed acute GVHD post allogeneic transplant.~aGVHD Stages~Skin:~- a maculopapular eruption involving < 25% BSA~- a maculopapular eruption involving 25 - 50% BSA~- generalized erythroderma~- generalized erythroderma w/ bullous formation and often w/ desquamation~Liver:~- bilirubin 2.0 - 3.0 mg/100 mL~- bilirubin 3 - 5.9 mg/100 mL~- bilirubin 6 - 14.9 mg/100 mL~- bilirubin > 15 mg/100 mL~Gut:~Diarrhea is graded 1 - 4 in severity. Nausea and vomiting and/or anorexia caused by GVHD is assigned as 1 in severity. The severity of gut involvement is assigned to the most severe involvement noted. Patients with visible bloody diarrhea are at least stage 2 gut and grade 3 overall.~aGVHD Grades Grade II: Stage 1 - 2 skin w/ no gut/liver involvement Grade III: Stage 2 - 4 gut involvement and/or stage 2 - 4 liver involvement Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 w/ extreme constitutional symptoms or death" (NCT00793572)
Timeframe: 100 days post allo transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tandem Auto-/Nonmyeloablative Allo-HCT and Maintenance Therapy14

[back to top]

Safety and Engraftment

Peripheral blood progenitor cells were collected with either chemo-mobilization (27 of 39, 69%) or growth factor mobilization (12 of 39, 31%). Patients received an average of 9.0 × 10^6/kg CD34+ cells (range, 2.3-65) as their transplant graft. (NCT00793650)
Timeframe: Day 30 after transplant

,
Interventiondays (Median)
Median time for platelet recoveryMedian time for neutrophil recovery
Bortezomib After HD melphalanAll1612
Bortezomib Before HD Melphalan1612

[back to top]

Response Rate Using EBMT(European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplan) Criteria at Day +100 After Transplant.

"CR :Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <=5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg per 24 hour.~Partial Response:>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200mg per 24 hour." (NCT00793650)
Timeframe: 100 days after transplant

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete response (CR)VGPR-Very good partial remissionPartial Response
Bortezomib After Melphalan6117
Bortezomib Before Melphalan296

[back to top]

Three-month Progression-free Survival

"Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions." (NCT00798720)
Timeframe: Three-months post-treatment

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib11.1

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

(NCT00798720)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib4.7

[back to top]

Response Rate

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) for target lesions and assessed by MRI, CT, or chest x-ray: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR+PR. (NCT00798720)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial responseStable diseaseProgressive disease
Vorinostat + Bortezomib0513

[back to top]

Toxicity

Graded using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (NCT00798720)
Timeframe: 30 days post-treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Thrombocytopenia Grade 3Thrombocytopenia Grade 4Lymphopenia Grade 3Fatigue Grade 3Fatigue Grade 4Vomiting Grade 3Dizziness Grade 3Syncope Grade 3Neuropathy Grade 3Hyponatremia Grade 3
Vorinostat + Bortezomib7134122223

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Response

Computed tomography scans and/or Positron emission tomography (PET) scans obtained every two cycles to evaluate response using International Workshop Criteria of Complete Response, Partial Response, Progressive Disease, or Stable Disease. (NCT00810576)
Timeframe: Every two 21-day cycles

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete ResponsePartial ResponseProgressive DiseaseStable Disease
Vorinostat + Bortezomib0010

[back to top]

Time to Progression of Disease

'Median time to progression of disease is assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria or death from any cause. IMWG criteria: increase of >=25% from lowest level in Serum M-component or (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dL]); Urine M component or (the absolute increase must be >=200 milligram per 24 hour. Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels. The absolute increase >10 mg/dL. Bone marrow plasma cell percentage >=10%. Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing. Development of hypercalcemia. Participants who died or dropped out due to any reason without progression will be censored with the day of death or drop-out, respectively and who are alive at the end of the study without any progression was censored with the last available date. (NCT00813150)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization until the disease progression or participant's death from any cause whichever occurred first, as assessed up to 72 weeks after end of treatment visit (ie, 46 days after last dose of study medication)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vd (Bortezomib + Dexamethasone)12.6
Vcd (Bortezomib + Low-dose Dexamethasone + Cyclophosphamide)9.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Time interval in months time from randomisation to death from any cause. (NCT00813150)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization until Month 49

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vd (Bortezomib + Dexamethasone)NA
Vcd (Bortezomib + Low-dose Dexamethasone + Cyclophosphamide)41.50

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as time from randomization to myeloma progression according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria or death from any cause. IMWG criteria: increase of ≥25 percent from lowest response level in Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL) Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24 hour. Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels. The absolute increase must be >10 mg/dL. Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: the absolute percent must be ≥10 percent. Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.65mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. PFS included disease progression as well as death. (NCT00813150)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization until the disease progression or participant's death from any cause whichever occured first, as assessed up to 72 weeks after end of treatment visit (ie, 46 days after last dose of study medication)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Vd (Bortezomib + Dexamethasone)12.6
Vcd (Bortezomib + Low-dose Dexamethasone + Cyclophosphamide)9.9

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) - International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria

Percentage of participants who achieved stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) is reported in the below table. IMWG criteria- CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow; sCR: CR+Normal free light chain ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescencec; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90%; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg per 24 hour. (NCT00813150)
Timeframe: Up to 46 days after last bortezomib dose, or as soon as possible after early discontinuation of study treatment or before start of alternative anti-myeloma therapy

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Vd (Bortezomib + Dexamethasone)74.4
Vcd (Bortezomib + Low-dose Dexamethasone + Cyclophosphamide)70.2

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Tolerating >50% Steroid Dose Reduction After a 15 Week Course of Bortezomib Plus Prednisone in Patients With cGVHD

The participants' total daily steroid dose was recorded at baseline and after a 15 week course of treatment. Starting at a dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg, dose reduction of steroids was permitted after 1 cycle of therapy. The suggested taper was 10-25% every 1-2 weeks. . (NCT00815919)
Timeframe: After 15 weeks of bortezomib plus prednisone therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Velcade (Bortezomib)14

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate After a 15 Week Course of Bortezomib Plus Prednisone in Patients With cGVHD

"Participants had their cGVHD evaluated per NIH consensus criteria:~Complete response: resolution of all reversible manifestations of cGVHD.~Partial response: a decrease ≥ 1 point on a 3-point organ-specific scale or 2 points or more on a 10-point global scale without progression in any organ sites.~Stable disease: no evidence of cGVHD response without evidence of progressive cGVHD.~Progressive cGVHD: increase of ≥ 1 point on an organ-specific 3-point scale, addition of a new immunosuppressive agent prior to the completion of 15 weeks of combination therapy, or requirement an increase in the total daily dose of corticosteroids above a participant's baseline corticosteroid dose during the 15-week combined treatment period.~Mixed response: a response in primary sites of cGVHD involvement but interval progressive cGVHD in other organs or sites.~Responses were not scored for oral or ocular cGVHD, since topical therapies were permitted during the study." (NCT00815919)
Timeframe: Patients had their cGVHD assessed at Baseline and at 15 weeks or end of therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with a complete response in cGVHDParticipants with an partial response in cGVHDParticipants with stable cGVHDParticipants with progressive cGVHDParticipants with mixed response
Velcade (Bortezomib)214121

[back to top]

Proportion of cGVHD Patients Requiring Prednisone by 1 Year After Therapy

Participants who were still being followed 1 year after the start of therapy had their prednisone dose recorded. (NCT00815919)
Timeframe: 1 year after the start of study treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants still requiring prednisoneParticipants off prednisone
Velcade (Bortezomib)116

[back to top]

Overall and cGVHD Progression-free Survival by 1 Year After Therapy

(NCT00815919)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
2-year Cum-incidence of Non-relapse mortality2-year Cum-incidence of malignant relapse2 year progression-free survival2-year Overall survival
Velcade (Bortezomib)14147373

[back to top]

The Toxicity of a 15 Week Course of Bortezomib Plus Prednisone in Patients With cGVHD

Participants' toxicities were graded based on the CTCAE version 3.0. The toxicities were then given an attribution to the velcade treatment: unrelated, unlikely, possible, probable, definite. (NCT00815919)
Timeframe: Toxicities were collected from the start of treatment through 15 weeks of therapy or end of study treatmetn

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Participants with >= Grade 3, unrelated/unlikelyParticipants with >= Grade 3, possibleParticipants with >= Grade 3, probable/definite
Velcade (Bortezomib)710

[back to top]

Number of Patients by Best Clinical Response

Assessed by the International Working Group response criteria: Complete Remission - <5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; Partial Remission - bone marrow blasts decreased by > 50% over pre-treatment but still >5%; and Hematologic Improvement - hemoglobin increase by > 1.5g/dl or decreased transfusions by at least 4/8 week period, platelet absolute increase of >30 X 10^9/L for those starting at >20 X 10^9/L . For those < 20 X 10^9 /L at baseline increase by 100%. (NCT00818649)
Timeframe: At Completion of Course 3 (Day 63)

InterventionPatients (Number)
Complete RemissionProgressive DiseaseStable Disease
Evaluable Patients165

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response + Partial Response in Relation to Cytogenetic Subgroups (Per-protocol Set)

Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with response of combined CR+PR according to the EBMT criteria. As per the EBMT criteria, CR is defined as the absence of serum and urine monoclonal paraprotein and no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions; PR is defined as not all CR criteria and 50 percentage or more reduction in serum monoclonal paraprotein. Percentage of participants with complete or partial response that carried the indicated cytogenetic marker is reported. Same participant could count in more than one category due to multiple responses possible. (NCT00833560)
Timeframe: Up to Day 63

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
13q- (n=92)t (4;14) (n=34)17p- (n=24)Other (n=87)No changes (n=87)
Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone92.491.287.588.585.1

[back to top]

Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) (Per-protocol Analysis Set)

CR and PR are defined by the local investigator according to the current European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. According to EBMT criteria, CR is defined as the absence of serum and urine monoclonal paraprotein + no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions; and PR is defined as not all CR criteria + 50 percentage or more reduction in serum monoclonal paraprotein. (NCT00833560)
Timeframe: Up to Day 63

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone284

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response + Partial Response in Relation to Cytogenetic Subgroups (Efficacy Set)

Response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with response of combined CR+PR according to the EBMT criteria. As per the EBMT criteria, CR is defined as the absence of serum and urine monoclonal paraprotein and no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions; PR is defined as not all CR criteria and 50 percentage or more reduction in serum monoclonal paraprotein. Percentage of participants with complete or partial response that carried the indicated cytogenetic marker is reported. Same participant could count in more than one category due to multiple responses possible (NCT00833560)
Timeframe: Up to Day 63

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
13q- (n=112)t (4;14) (n=38)17p- (n=31)Other (n=104)No changes (n=102)
Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone90.289.574.287.584.3

[back to top]

Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) (Efficacy Set)

CR and PR are defined by the local investigator according to the current European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. According to EBMT criteria, CR is defined as the absence of serum and urine monoclonal paraprotein + no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions; and PR is defined as not all CR criteria + 50 percentage or more reduction in serum monoclonal paraprotein. (NCT00833560)
Timeframe: Up to Day 63

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone334

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression in Patients Who Progressed

Patients will be followed for initial response to therapy and for progression of disease. Response criteria will be scored according to International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria. (NCT00839956)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Arm I (Bortezomib and Vorinostat)2.1

[back to top]

Median Follow-up Survival for All Patients

(NCT00839956)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionyears (Median)
Arm I (Bortezomib and Vorinostat)5.15

[back to top]

Survival for All Patients

(NCT00839956)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Bortezomib and Vorinostat)25

[back to top]

Toxicity as Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0

The first three months of therapy will be used as the time period in which toxicity will be evaluated and stopping rules for unacceptable toxicity will be implemented. Rules for stopping the study will be based on the rate of withdrawal due to significant toxicity (grade IV, non-hematological, non-metabolic, nonperipheral neuropathy). (NCT00839956)
Timeframe: The first three months of therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm I (Bortezomib and Vorinostat)0

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of This Combination of Drugs as Assessed by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (Cohort 1) [MTD Cyclophosphamide, MTD Bortezmib, MTD Docxorubicin]

If 3 patients of cohort 1 require dose reduction of one or more of the medications for toxicity attributed to the drug or drugs, then the starting dose level will be reduced for that drug or drugs for future patients. The initial dosing of drugs for cohort 2 will be permitted to be one dose level above the maximal tolerated doses of cohort 1. Note that this Outcome Measure shows MTD for cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and doxorubicin. MTD for dexamethasone is include in a separate table due to the different Unit of Measure. (NCT00849251)
Timeframe: Up to 90 days after initiation of study treatment

Interventionmg/m2 (Number)
MTD cyclophosphamideMTD bortezomibMTD liposomal doxorubicin
Relapsed Disease3001.630

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of This Combination of Drugs as Assessed by the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (Cohort 1). [Dexamethasone MTD]

If 3 patients of cohort 1 require dose reduction of one or more of the medications for toxicity attributed to the drug or drugs, then the starting dose level will be reduced for that drug or drugs for future patients. The initial dosing of drugs for cohort 2 will be permitted to be one dose level above the maximal tolerated doses of cohort 1. Note that this Outcome Measure will only describe the MTD for dexamethasone. Dexamethasone could not be reported with the MTD for the other three drugs due to a different Unit of Measure. (NCT00849251)
Timeframe: Up to 90 days after initiation of study treatment

Interventionmg (Number)
Relapsed Disease (Cohort I)40

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

The proportion of response-evaluable subjects who achieved a confirmed complete response (CR) or complete response unconfirmed (CRu). Disease response and progression were evaluated according to modified International Workshop Response Criteria (IWRC) criteria by radiographic imaging and other procedures as necessary. (NCT00850499)
Timeframe: Up to 8 cycles (1 cycle is 35 days: 280 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Velcade + Fludarabine2
Rituximab + Fludarabine3

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

The proportion of subjects who achieve CR, CRu, or partial response (PR) relative to the response evaluable population. Disease response and progression were evaluated according to the modified IWRC criteria by radiographic imaging and other procedures as necessary. (NCT00850499)
Timeframe: Up to 8 cycles (1 cycle is 35 days: 280 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Velcade + Fludarabine3
Rituximab + Fludarabine6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)

The number of participants with ≥1 AE is reported. An AE is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the study product(s), whether or not considered related to the use of the product(s). (NCT00858234)
Timeframe: Up to 346 days (up to 30 days after the final dose of study treatment)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib9

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From 0 to 24 Hours Postdose (AUC0-24hr) of Vorinostat Administered With Bortezomib on Days 1 and 11

The AUC0-24hr of vorinostat in plasma on Days 1 and 11 is reported in participants who also received bortezomib. (NCT00858234)
Timeframe: Predose and 0.8, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours postdose on Days 1 and 11

InterventionµM*hr (Least Squares Mean)
Day 1Day 11
Vorinostat + Bortezomib5.415.84

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) During Cycle 1

The number of participants with ≥1 DLT during Cycle 1 is reported. A DLT is defined as an event considered by the investigator to be related to study treatment, and either: 1) a Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic event (except for manageable toxicity by supportive care or non-prohibited therapies, or a transient increase in alanine aminotransferase [ALT]/aspartate aminotransferase [AST]); or 2) a Grade 4 hematologic toxicity except neutropenia or hemoglobin decreased (neutropenia was a DLT if it was Grade 3-4 with fever ≥38.5°C; Grade 3-4 with an infection requiring antibiotic/antifungal therapy; or Grade 4 and lasting ≥5 days). (NCT00858234)
Timeframe: Up to 21 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Vorinostat + Bortezomib1

[back to top]

Number of Subject With Complete Response

Per standard lymphoma response criteria (Cheson): Complete Response (CR), 1. Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease related symptoms if present before therapy, with normalization of LDH if elevated prior to therapy. 2. All lymph nodes and masses must regress to normal size (<1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter if >1.5 cm prior to treatment). 3. The spleen, if enlarged prior to therapy, must have regressed to normal size. 3. If bone marrow was involved by lymphoma, it must be cleared as documented by biopsy at the same location. (NCT00863369)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 1 Tx Schema I - Velcade 1.0 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m21
Dose Level Tx Schema I -1 - Velcade 1.0 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 800 mg/m20
Dose Level 3B Tx Schema II - Velcade 1.0 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 800 mg/m20
Dose Level 4B Tx Schema II - Velcade 1.3 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 800 mg/m20
Dose Level 5B Tx Schema II - Velcade 1.3 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m21
Dose Level 5B Tx Schema II - Velcade 1.3 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, Rituximab 375 mg/m21

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least One Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

Adverse events were graded by NCI CTCAE, Version 3.0. DLT defined as grade 4 thrombocytopenia, or grade 3 thrombocytopenia lasting greater than 7 days. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting 7 days or more despite use of growth factors. Febrile neutropenia only is it occurs after 7 days of neutropenia. Any grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity related to the study drug, with the exception of alopecia, inadequately treated nausea, vomiting and/or diarrhea and fatigue. (NCT00863369)
Timeframe: 28 days from start of treatment, up to 2 years.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Level 1 Tx Schema I - Velcade 1.0 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m23
Dose Level Tx Schema I -1 - Velcade 1.0 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 800 mg/m21
Dose Level 3B Tx Schema II - Velcade 1.0 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 800 mg/m20
Dose Level 4B Tx Schema II - Velcade 1.3 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 800 mg/m20
Dose Level 5B Tx Schema II - Velcade 1.3 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m20
Dose Level 5B Tx Schema II - Velcade 1.3 mg/m2, Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, Rituximab 375 mg/m20

[back to top]

Remission Duration Among Patients Who Respond to Treatment

(NCT00869323)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 8 Months Post Treatment

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treated Study Participants45

[back to top]

Relapse-free Survival

(NCT00869323)
Timeframe: at 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treated Study Participants2

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT00869323)
Timeframe: at 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treated Study Participants1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Overall (Complete and Partial) Response Rates

(NCT00869323)
Timeframe: Day 1 to 2 Years Post Treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treated Study Participants2

[back to top]

Time to Treatment Failure

(NCT00869323)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Time of Disease Progression

Interventionmonths (Number)
Treated Study Participants1

[back to top]

Toxic Death Rate

The proportion of toxic death rate among all eligible patients. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall2.1

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 1

Percentage of eligible and evaluable patients with MRD < 0.01% among those who had successful MRD determination at the end of Block 1. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: End of Block 1 (Day 36 of Block 1) of re-induction therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs35.4
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs25

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 2

Percentage of eligible and evaluable patients with MRD < 0.01% among those who had successful MRD determination at the end of Block 2. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: End of Block 2 (Day 36 of Block 2) of re-induction therapy

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs66.7
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs42.1

[back to top]

Rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) < 0.01% at End Block 3

Percentage of eligible and evaluable patients with MRD < 0.01% among those who had successful MRD determination at the end of Block 3. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: End of Block 3 (Day 36 of Block 3) of re-induction therapy

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs80
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs63.6

[back to top]

Severe Adverse Events (SAE) Rate.

The proportion of SAE rate among all eligible patients (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Overall8.2

[back to top]

Event Free Survival

Percentage of patients who were event free at 4 months (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: 4 months after enrollment

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs68.5
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs37.8

[back to top]

Second Complete Remission Rate at the End of Block 1 Reinduction Chemotherapy

The percentage of eligible and evaluable patients who have achieved complete response at the end Block 1 of re-induction therapy. (NCT00873093)
Timeframe: The outcome is measured the end of Block 1 (Day 36 of Block 1) of re-induction therapy.

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Pre-B ALL Relapse 18-36 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy)Age<=21 Yrs72.2
Pre-B ALL Relapse <18 Mths From Dx (Chemotherapy) Age <=21 Yrs63

[back to top]

Response Rate of Plerixafor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma (ORR) [Phase I and Phase II]

Overall response was established based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria with 6 potential categories: Complete Response (CR) which is a complete disappearance of monoclonal paraprotein based on negative immunofixation on the serum M-component and urine M-component and no evidence of myeloma in bone marrow, Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) defined as serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg per 24 hours, Partial Response (PR) ≥50% reduction in serum M-component or ≥90% reduction urine M-component or urine M-component <200 mg per 24 hours, Minimal Response (MR) ≥25% reduction in serum or urine M-component, Stable Disease (SD) defined as failure to meet any response criteria, and Progressive Disease (PD) ≥ 25% increase from lowest value reported in serum M-component (absolute ≥0.5 g/dL) and/or urine M-component (absolute ≥200 mg/24 hours). (NCT00903968)
Timeframe: Disease was assessed for response every cycle on treatment. The maximum number of cycles received was 25.

,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponseVery Good Partial ResponsePartial ResponseMinimal ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
All Phase II Participants13124112
Phase I Dose Level 1000030
Phase I Dose Level 2000021
Phase I Dose Level 3100020
Phase I Dose Level 4000201
Phase I Dose Level 5000040
Phase I Dose Level 5B001131
Phase I Dose Level 6010020

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP) [Phase II]

TTP estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from registration to progression based on IMWG criteria or date last known progression-free for those who have not progressed. [Durie BG et al. Leukemia. 2006] Progression (PD): ≥ 25% increase from lowest value reported in serum M-component (absolute increase ≥0.5 g/dL) and/or urine M-component (absolute increase ≥200 mg/24 hours); if appropriate, a ≥25% increase above the lowest level in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase >10 mg/dL); If none of these are measurable then ≥25% increase in bone marrow plasma cell percentage above the lowest response level (absolute ≥10%); Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas OR increase in size of existing (NCT00903968)
Timeframe: DIsease was assessed to document progression every cycle on treatment and post-treatment every 12 weeks until progression.

InterventionMonths (Median)
All Phase II Participants12.6

[back to top]

Plerixafor Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) [Phase I]

The MTD plerixafor in combination with bortezomib is determined by the number of patients who experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). See subsequent primary outcome measure for the DLT definition. The MTD is defined as highest dose level at which fewer than one-third of patients experience a DLT. The MTD was reached at dose level 5B. The maximum tolerated dose of plerixafor was given on days 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 13 of 21 each cycle. (NCT00903968)
Timeframe: Participants were assessed every 3 weeks while on study; The observation period for MTD evaluation was the first 21 days of treatment.

Interventionug/kg (Number)
All Phase I Particiapnts320

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) [Phase I]

A DLT was defined as (a) grade 3 or greater non-hematologic toxicity, considered by the investigator to be related to plerixafor or bortezomib, with the exception of nausea, vomiting or diarrhea unless receiving maximal medical therapy, (b) grade 4 hematologic toxicity defined as: thrombocytopenia with platelets <10,000 on more than one occasion within first cycle despite transfusion. Grade 4 neutropenia must occur for more than 5 days and/or result in neutropenic fever with elevated temperature (defined as > 101 degrees F). (c) inability to receive Day 1 dose for Cycle 2 due to toxicity. All adverse events were graded according to the CTEP Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE v.3.0). (NCT00903968)
Timeframe: Participants were assessed every 3 weeks while on study; The observation period for MTD evaluation was the first 21 days of treatment.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I Dose Level 10
Phase I Dose Level 20
Phase I Dose Level 30
Phase I Dose Level 40
Phase I Dose Level 50
Phase I Dose Level 5B0
Phase I Dose Level 62

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) [Phase II]

DOR is defined as the time from response to disease progression or death, or date last known progression-free and alive for those who have not progressed or died. DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT00903968)
Timeframe: DIsease was assessed to document response every cycle on treatment and post-treatment every 12 weeks until progression.

InterventionMonths (Median)
All Phase II Participants12.9

[back to top]

Bortezomib Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) [Phase I]

The MTD plerixafor in combination with bortezomib is determined by the number of patients who experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). See subsequent primary outcome measure for the DLT definition. The MTD is defined as highest dose level at which fewer than one-third of patients experience a DLT. The MTD was reached at dose level 5B. The maximum tolerated dose of bortezomib was given on days 3, 6, 10, 13 of 21 each cycle. (NCT00903968)
Timeframe: Participants were assessed every 3 weeks while on study; The observation period for MTD evaluation was the first 21 days of treatment.

Interventionmg/m2 (Number)
All Phase I Particiapnts1.3

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Is calculated as the time from start of treatment to the date of the first observation of disease progression or relapse from CR. Deaths owing to causes other than progression not counted, but censored. Subjects who withdraw from the study or die will be censored at the time of last disease assessment. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0). (NCT00908232)
Timeframe: At Day 1 of each treatment cycle, at the End of Treatment visit until there is evidence of Progressive Disease or relapse from Complete Response (CR), Median Follow-up of 16.9 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Complete to Partial Response: Bortezomib + Dexamethasone366.0
Stable Disease After 4 Cycles: VD, VDC, VDL214.0

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

"Time from start of treatment to date of disease progression, relapse from CR or death. Estimated using the kaplan-meier method. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions, or similar definition as accurate and appropriate." (NCT00908232)
Timeframe: At Day 1 of each treatment cycle, at the End of Treatment visit until there is evidence of Progressive Disease or relapse from Complete Response (CR). Median Follow-Up of 16.9 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Complete to Partial Response: Bortezomib + Dexamethasone311.0
Stable Disease After 4 Cycles: VD, VDC, VDL214.0

[back to top]

Overall Best Confirmed Response

Overall Best Confirmed Response is the best Overall Response Rate with borezomib-dexamathasone (+/-cyclophosphamide or lenalidomide) recorded between baseline and end of treatment. Response was assessed using the International Myeloma working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria and validated by an Independent Monitoring Committee. (NCT00908232)
Timeframe: Prior to treatment at day 1 of each cycle and at the end of treatment (day 21 of cycle 8), up to 168 days

Interventionnumber of participants (Number)
Complete to Partial Response: Bortezomib + Dexamethasone101
Stable Disease After 4 Cycles: VD, VDC, VDL6

[back to top]

One Year Survival

Percent Probability of Survival at 1 year from the start of treatment, estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. (NCT00908232)
Timeframe: At each visit from baseline to end of treatment. After treatment, monthly visit until progression or relapse or until the start of alternative MMY therapy, up to 1 year

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
Complete to Partial Response: Bortezomib + Dexamethasone80
Stable Disease After 4 Cycles: VD, VDC, VDL89

[back to top]

Median Time to First Confirmed Response

Time from start of treatment to the date of the first documentation of a confirmed response. Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Response was assessed using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria and validated by an Independent Monitoring Committee. (NCT00908232)
Timeframe: At Day 1 of each treatment cycle, at the End of Treatment visit until there is evidence of Progressive Disease or relapse from Complete Response (CR), up to 168 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Complete to Partial Response: Bortezomib + Dexamethasone43.0
Stable Disease After 4 Cycles: VD, VDC, VDLNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Is defined as the time interval from start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death (including subjects lost to follow-up), survival time will be censored at the last date the subject is known to be alive (NCT00908232)
Timeframe: At each visit from baseline to end of treatment. After treatment, monthly visit until progression or relapse or until the start of alternative MMY therapy. Further follow up by monthly phone call until the last patient was treated and followed for 1 year

Interventiondays (Median)
Complete to Partial Response: Bortezomib + DexamethasoneNA
Stable Disease After 4 Cycles: VD, VDC, VDLNA

[back to top]

Number of Living Donor Transplant Candidates That Are Transplanted

Number of living donor transplant candidates who convert to a negative flow T- and B-cell crossmatch via desensitization and are subsequently transplanted (NCT00908583)
Timeframe: 1 year post baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Study Participants19

[back to top]

Overall Safety of Bortezomib

Incidence of grade 3 and above non-hematologic toxicities. Incidence of grade 4 hematologic toxicities. Incidence of all grades of peripheral neuropathy. Incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Polyomavirus Allograft Nephropathy (PVN), and Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD). (NCT00908583)
Timeframe: Study Day 62

,,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Incidence of CTCAE Grade 3 Anemia (<8.0-6.5 g/dL)Incidence of CTCAE Grade 4 Anemia (<6.5g/dL)Incidence of CTCAE Grade 3 ThrombocytopeniaIncidence of CTCAE Grade 4 ThrombocytopeniaIncidence of CTCAE Grade 3 NeutropeniaIncidence of CTCAE Grade 4 NeutropeniaIncidence of new onset level 1 PNIncidence of new onset level 2 PNIncidence of new onset level 3 PNIncidence of new onset level 4 PNIncidence of new onset level 5 PNCMV D+/R- StatusCMV Viremia or Invasive DiseasePolyomavirus Allograft Nephropathy (PVN)Malignancy
Phase 1 Cycle 2202010033100000
Phase 1, Cycle 1101000151010000
Phase 2 Cycle 2000000230000000
Phase 2, Cycle 1100000320100000
Phase 3, Cycle 1001000021000000
Phase 3, Cycle 2001000110010000
Phase 4, Single Stage000000000000000
Phase 5, Single Stage100000100000000

[back to top]

Acute Rejection Rate

Acute rejection rate at 6 months of all desensitized and transplanted patients (NCT00908583)
Timeframe: 6 months post transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Transplanted Participants3

[back to top]

Number of Patients Whose Cytotoxic Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) is Decreased by 50%

Number of patients on the waiting list whose cytotoxic PRA is decreased by 50%. (NCT00908583)
Timeframe: 46 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
All Study Participants6

[back to top]

1-year Survival Rate

Percentage of participants who are alive at the end of year 1 after randomization (NCT00911859)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone)87.8
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone) + Siltuximab87.5

[back to top]

1-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate

The 1-year PFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants surviving 1 year after randomization without disease progression or death. (NCT00911859)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone)77.5
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone) + Siltuximab72.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Stringent Complete Response (sCR) - International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria

sCR was assesses by IMWG Criteria: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, <=5% plasma cells in bone marrow, normal free light chain ratio, absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence. sCR is a CR that has been confirmed by immunofixation + free light chain assay + either bone marrow immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence (NCT00911859)
Timeframe: Up to disease progression, approximately 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone)6.1
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone) + Siltuximab4.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Overall Response ie, Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) - European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Criteria

CR or PR was assessed using EBMT criteria. CR: disappearance of the original monoclonal paraprotein from the blood and urine on at least 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks by immunofixation studies, <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow on at least 1 determination, if skeletal survey is available: no increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions (development of a compression fracture does not exclude response), disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for at least 6 weeks; PR: >=50% reduction in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein for at least 2 determinations 6 weeks apart, if present, reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion by either >=90% or to <200 mg for at least 2 determinations 6 weeks apart, >=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas (by clinical or radiographic examination) for at least 6 weeks, if skeletal survey is available: no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions (NCT00911859)
Timeframe: Up to disease progression, approximately 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone)79.6
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone) + Siltuximab87.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR) - European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Criteria

CR was assessed using EMBT criteria: disappearance of the original monoclonal paraprotein from the blood and urine on at least 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks by immunofixation studies, <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow on at least 1 determination, if skeletal survey is available: no increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions (development of a compression fracture does not exclude response), disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for at least 6 weeks. (NCT00911859)
Timeframe: Up to disease progression, approximately 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone)22.4
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone) + Siltuximab26.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time interval in days between the date of randomization and the participant's death from any cause. (NCT00911859)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization till the date of death, as assessed up to the end of study (approximately 3 years)

InterventionDays (Median)
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone)NA
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone) + SiltuximabNA

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as length from the earliest date a participant achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to either date for disease progression (including relapse from CR) or the censoring date for progressive disease. Responders without disease progression were censored at the last efficacy assessment for disease progression. (NCT00911859)
Timeframe: From the date participants achieved CR or PR to either date for disease progression (including relapse from CR) or the censoring date for progressive disease, as assessed Up to 30 days after last dose of study medication

InterventionDays (Median)
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone)497
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone) + Siltuximab583

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time between randomization and either disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. (NCT00911859)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first, as assessed up to the last efficacy assessment for disease progression (approximately 3 years)

InterventionDays (Median)
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone)518
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone) + Siltuximab519

[back to top]

Change From Baseline to Cycle 9 in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ C30)

"Global health status/quality of life is a subscale of the EORTC QOL C30, which comprises two questions related to overall health/quality of life during the past week. The raw score to each question ranged from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). The raw mean score of health status/quality of life subscale is calculated for each participant and a linear transformation applied to standardize the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher (better) health and quality of life." (NCT00911859)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 predose) and Cycle 9 (Week 54)

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone)14.78
Part 2: VMP (Velcade+Melphalan+Prednisone) + Siltuximab8.33

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical events that jeopardize the participants or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition, or a drug-induced liver injury. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 12 cycles of 3 weeks each

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEAny SAE
SRT501 + Bortezomib93
SRT501 Monotherapy2412

[back to top]

Change From in Baseline Biochemistry: Serum Creatinine, Total Bilirubin

Blood samples were collected to evaluate hematology parameters serum creatinine and total bilirubin. Change from Baseline was defined as the value of baseline minus from the End of study visit. Baseline was defined as Day 1. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and End of Study assessments/follow-up approximately 28 days (+/- 7 days) following the last dose of SRT501 or SRT501 and bortezomib (approximately 280 days)

,
InterventionMicromole per liter (Mean)
Serum creatinineTotal bilirubin
SRT501 + Bortezomib3.600.80
SRT501 Monotherapy59.81.6

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology: White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Platelets

Blood samples collected to evaluate the hematology parameters were WBC count, neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets. Change from Baseline was defined as the value of Baseline minus from the End of study visit. Baseline was defined as Day 1. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and End of Study assessments/follow-up approximately 28 days (+/- 7 days) following the last dose of SRT501 or SRT501 and bortezomib (approximately 280 days)

,
Intervention10^9 cells per liter (L) (Mean)
WBC countNeutrophilsLymphocytesPlatelets
SRT501 + Bortezomib0.070.32-0.34-9.3
SRT501 Monotherapy0.550.270.09-12.1

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biochemistry -Urea, Bicarbonate

Blood samples were collected to evaluate the biochemistry parameter urea and bicarbonate. Change from Baseline was defined as the value of Baseline minus from the End of study visit. Baseline was defined as Day 1. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and End of Study assessments/follow-up approximately 28 days (+/- 7 days) following the last dose of SRT501 or SRT501 and bortezomib (approximately 280 days)

,
Interventionmillimole per liter (Mean)
BicarbonateUrea
SRT501 + Bortezomib0.64-0.18
SRT501 Monotherapy-0.813.50

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Time to disease progression was defined as the time from first dose until objective tumor progression. Participants who did not experience tumor progression were censored at their last known date in the study. It was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Participants who did not experience tumor progression were censored at their last known date in the study. The first quartile for time to disease progression was evaluated when 25th percentile of participants of mITT population reported disease progression. Similarly, median and 75th percentile of participants of MITT population was planned to be reported. If, less than 75th percentile of participants reported disease progression at the end of the study period, then the observation was censored for the purpose of this analysis and in such case the data was planned to be reported as not evaluable (NA). (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: From Day 1 till disease progression (approximately 12 cycles of 3 weeks each)

InterventionMonths (Median)
SRT501 Monotherapy2.8
SRT501 + Bortezomib2.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biochemistry: Prothrombin Time (PT)/ International Normalized Ratio (INR)

Blood samples were collected to evaluate the biochemistry parameter PT/INR. Change from Baseline was defined as the value of Baseline minus from the End of study visit. Baseline was defined as Day 1. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and End of Study assessments/follow-up approximately 28 days (+/- 7 days) following the last dose of SRT501 or SRT501 and bortezomib (approximately 280 days)

InterventionRatio of PT/INR (Mean)
SRT501 Monotherapy0.11
SRT501 + Bortezomib0.05

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology: Hematocrit

Blood samples were collected to evaluate the hematology parameter hematocrit. Change from Baseline was defined as the value of baseline minus from the End of study visit. Baseline was defined as Day 1. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and End of Study assessments/follow-up approximately 28 days (+/- 7 days) following the last dose of SRT501 or SRT501 and bortezomib (approximately 280 days)

InterventionProportion of red blood cells in blood (Mean)
SRT501 Monotherapy-0.04
SRT501 + Bortezomib-0.03

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology: Hemoglobin

Blood samples were collected to evaluate the hematology parameter hemoglobin. Change from Baseline was defined as the value of Baseline minus from the End of study visit. Baseline was defined as Day 1. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and End of Study assessments/follow-up approximately 28 days (+/- 7 days) following the last dose of SRT501 or SRT501 and bortezomib (approximately 280 days)

InterventionGram per litre (Mean)
SRT501 Monotherapy-11.4
SRT501 + Bortezomib-9.17

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Hematology: Red Blood Cell (RBC)

Blood samples were collected to evaluate the hematology parameter RBC. Change from Baseline was defined as the value of Baseline minus from the End of study visit. Baseline was defined as Day 1. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and End of Study assessments/follow-up approximately 28 days (+/- 7 days) following the last dose of SRT501 or SRT501 and bortezomib (approximately 280 days)

Intervention10^12 cells per liter (Mean)
SRT501 Monotherapy-0.30
SRT501 + Bortezomib-0.16

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Minor Response (MR) as Best Response (BR)

MR includes some, but not all, criteria for PR providing the remaining criteria satisfied: ≥25% to ≤ 49% reduction in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein for at least 2 immunofixation determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks, If present, a 50 to 89% reduction in 24 hr light chain excretion, which still exceeds 200 mg/24 hr, for at least 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks, 25-49% reduction in the size of plasmacytomas (by clinical or radiographic examination) for a minimum of 6 weeks, No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions (development of compression fracture does not exclude response). (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Up to 12 cycles of 3 weeks each

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SRT501 Monotherapy0
SRT501 + Bortezomib1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate, defines proportion of participants with Complete response (CR), Partial response (PR) or Minimal response (MR) as best response for all cycles. In atleast 2 determinations for minimum of 6 week (Wks) for every criteria listed. CR defined as disappearance of original monoclonal (MC) paraprotein (PP) in blood and urine on immunofixation determinations (IFD); < 5 % plasma cells in bone marrow; no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions (LBLs); disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas (STP). PR defined as >= 50% reduction (RE) in level of serum MC PP for 2 IFDs; if present RE in 24 hour urinary light chain excretion (ULCE) by >= 90% RE or <200 mg; >= 50% RE in STP for; no increase in size or number of LBLs. MR criteria defined were >= 25% to <=49% RE serum MC PP; if present 50 to 89% RE in 24 hour LCE exceeding 200 mg/24 hour; 25% to 49% RE in size of STP; no increase in size or number of LBLs. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 12 cycles of 3 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SRT501 Monotherapy0
SRT501 + Bortezomib3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partial Response (PR) as Best Response (BR)

PR includes some, but not all, criteria for CR providing the remaining criteria are satisfied: ≥50% reduction in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein for at least 2 immunofixation determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks, If present, reduction in 24 hr urinary light chain excretion by either ≥90% or to <200 mg for at least 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks, ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas (by clinical or radiographic examination) for a minimum of 6 weeks, No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions (development of compression fracture does not exclude response). (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Up to 12 cycles of 3 weeks each

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SRT501 Monotherapy0
SRT501 + Bortezomib2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Partial Response (PR) as Last Observed Response (LOR)

PR includes some, but not all, criteria for CR providing the remaining criteria are satisfied: ≥50% reduction in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein for at least 2 immunofixation determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks, If present, reduction in 24 hr urinary light chain excretion by either ≥90% or to <200 mg for at least 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks, ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas (by clinical or radiographic examination) for a minimum of 6 weeks, No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions (development of compression fracture does not exclude response). (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Up to 12 cycles of 3 weeks each

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SRT501 Monotherapy0
SRT501 + Bortezomib1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) PD as Best Response (BR)

PD includes one or more of the following criteria: >25% increase in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 5 g/L and confirmed on a repeat investigation, >25% increase in 24 hr urinary light chain excretion, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 200 mg/24 hr and confirmed on a repeat investigation, >25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 10%., Definite increase in the size of existing lytic bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas, Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas (not including compression fracture), Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause). (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Up to 12 cycles of 3 weeks each

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SRT501 Monotherapy1
SRT501 + Bortezomib2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progressive Disease (PD) PD as Last Observed Response (LOR)

PD includes one or more of the following criteria: >25% increase in the level of serum monoclonal paraprotein, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 5 g/L and confirmed on a repeat investigation, >25% increase in 24 hr urinary light chain excretion, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 200 mg/24 hr and confirmed on a repeat investigation, >25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy, which must also be an absolute increase of at least 10%., Definite increase in the size of existing lytic bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas, Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas (not including compression fracture), Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause). (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Up to 12 cycles of 3 weeks each

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SRT501 Monotherapy2
SRT501 + Bortezomib4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) as Best Response (BR)

Stable disease included not meeting the criteria for MR or PD. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Up to 12 cycles of 3 weeks each

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SRT501 Monotherapy3
SRT501 + Bortezomib4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) as Last Observed Response (LOR)

Stable disease included not meeting the criteria for MR or PD. (NCT00920556)
Timeframe: Up to 12 cycles of 3 weeks each

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
SRT501 Monotherapy2
SRT501 + Bortezomib4

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response

Duration of response (DR) is defined as the time from the first response to progressive disease (PD). See outcome #4 for a PD definition. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 8.5 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - OverallNA

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression-Free Survival

Progression free survival is the time between the date of initiation of therapy to progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. See outcome #4 for a definition of PD. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 23 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - Overall15.21

[back to top]

Summary of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Counts of participants who had AEs are summarized in a variety of categories. Severity and relatedness to study drug are in the opinion of the investigator according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0. Severity is rated on a 5-point scale: 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=life threatening or disabling, and 5= death related to AE. Relatedness is assessed on a 5-point scale: not related, unlikely, possible, probable and definite. Definite, probable and possible answers are reported as 'related' to study medication. Deaths are reported up to 18 months. All the deaths occurred beyond the treatment-emergent timeframe since they occurred 6.5-16 months after the final dosing. All other parts of the summary represent the treatment-emergent timeframe (up to 8.5 months) which is the treatment period plus 30 days. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 8.5 months. Deaths are reported up to 18 months

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any adverse eventAny non-haematologic adverse eventSevere adverse event (grade 3 or 4)Treatment-related adverse eventsDeathsSerious adverse eventsWithdrawn from study due to AE
Bendamustine 50 mg/m^2 Cohort5534102
Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2 Cohort4434012
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 Cohort31312231575

[back to top]

Participants' Best Tumor Response as Assessed by the Investigator

Abbreviated criteria for response categories: CR includes the disappearance of the original monoclonal protein (M-protein) from blood and urine, and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow, and no increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions, and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for >=4 weeks. VGPR includes serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis, and reduction in 24-hr urinary light chain excretion by <100 mg, and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for >= 4 weeks, and no increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions. PR includes a >=50% reduction in serum M-protein, and reduction in 24-hr urinary light chain excretion by either >=90% or to <200 mg, and >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas, and no increase in size/number of lytic bone lesions. MR includes a >=25% and <=49% reduction in serum M-protein. SD does not meet criteria for the other response categories. See outcome #4 for a definition of PD. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 7.5 months (eight 28-day cycles)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Very good partial response (VGPR)Partial response (PR)Minimal response (MR)Stable disease (SD)Progressive disease (PD)
Bendamustine 50 mg/m^2 Cohort001121
Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2 Cohort000121
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 Cohort1285132

[back to top]

Time to the First Response

Time to first response is defined as the time from the initiation of therapy to the first evidence of a confirmed response (ie, CR, VGPR, PR, or MR). (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 8.5 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - Overall1.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With An Overall Tumor Response As Assessed By the Investigator

Overall tumor response is the sum of a complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR) and minimal response (MR). A modified version of the Bladé criteria for response was used. Abbreviated definitions for the response categories can be found in the description of outcome #3. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: Up to 7.5 months (eight 28-day cycles)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bendamustine 50 mg/m^2 Cohort40.0
Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2 Cohort25.0
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 Cohort51.6

[back to top]

Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

"Maximum tolerated dose was the dose that was 1 step lower than the dose where at least one third of patients experienced DLT. A DLT was defined as any of the following occurring during the first cycle:~grade 4 hematologic toxicity without regard for relationship to study drug treatment~thrombocytopenia grade 3 with grade 3 or grade 4 hemorrhage~grade 3 febrile neutropenia~grade 3 or grade 4 nausea and vomiting refractory to anti emetic therapy~any study drug related grade 3 or grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity~any drug related death~Toxicity grades (3=severe AE and 4=life-threatening or disabling AE) were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3." (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: Day 1 - 28

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bendamustine 50 mg/m^2 Cohort0
Bendamustine 70 mg/m^2 Cohort0
Bendamustine 90 mg/m^2 Cohort0

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Time to Progression (TTP)

"Time to progression was defined as the time from initiation of therapy to progressive disease (PD). PD requires at least one of the following:~>25% increase in serum monoclonal paraprotein (which must also be an absolute increase of at least 5 g/L),~>25% increase in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion (which must also be an absolute increase of at least 200 mg/24 h),~>25% increase in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy (which must also be an absolute increase of at least 10%),~definite increase in the size of existing lytic bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas,~the development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas,~the development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.8 mmol/L not attributable to any other cause)." (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 8.6 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - Overall8.4

[back to top]

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from initiation of therapy to death from any cause or last follow-up visit. (NCT00920855)
Timeframe: up to 23 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine and Bortezomib - Overall17.82

[back to top]

Terminal Half-Life (T1/2) of Bortezomib

The time it takes for the measured concentration of the drug to drop by half. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1, and cycle 3 day 1 (an average of 61 days); and Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours post dose

Interventionhour (Geometric Mean)
Before VandetanibAfter Vandetanib
Phase 19.412.5

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Daily Oral Bortezomib

A maximum tolerated dose for bortezomib will be determined if dose limiting toxicity is observed in 2 or more patients at one of the dose levels being evaluated. The MTD will be the dose level immediately preceding the dose level at which DLT (e.g. defined as neutrophil count below 1000/ µL (grade 3) on 2 consecutive measurements drawn at least 72 hours OR a single neutrophil count below 500/µL occurred. Platelet count below 50,000 µL (grade 3) on 2 consecutive measurements drawn at least 72 hours apart OR a singe platelet count below 25,000/µL. A platelet transfusion administered when platelet count is below 50,000/µL is dose limiting thrombocytopenia, unless the transfusion is being administered for peri-operative coverage. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: 80 days

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 11.3

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Daily Oral Vandetanib

A maximum tolerated dose for vandetanib will be determined if dose limiting toxicity is observed in 2 or more patients at one of the dose levels being evaluated. The MTD will be the dose level immediately preceding the dose level at which DLT (e.g. defined as neutrophil count below 1000/ µL (grade 3) on 2 consecutive measurements drawn at least 72 hours OR a single neutrophil count below 500/µL occurred. Platelet count below 50,000 µL (grade 3) on 2 consecutive measurements drawn at least 72 hours apart OR a singe platelet count below 25,000/µL. A platelet transfusion administered when platelet count is below 50,000/µL is dose limiting thrombocytopenia, unless the transfusion is being administered for peri-operative coverage. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: 80 days

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase 1300

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression. Comparison of PFS between cohorts 1, 2A and 2B was to be assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: 2-3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase 130.2
Phase 2A3.02

[back to top]

Area Under the Bortezomib Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity/Dose (AUCinf/D)

The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) was calculated using the linear up-log down trapezoidal method via extrapolation of AUC(LAST) (AUC to the last quantifiable time point) by dividing C(LAST) (the last measurable drug concentration, typically at 24 hour post-dose) by the rate constant of the terminal phase, lambda z. This constant was determined from the slope of the terminal phase of the concentration-time curve using weighted least-squares as the estimation procedure. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1, and cycle 3 day 1 (an average of 61 days); and Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours post dose

Interventionhr*ng/mL/mg (Geometric Mean)
Before VandetanibAfter Vandetanib
Phase 1 - Vandetanib and Bortezomib1.272.39

[back to top]

Bortezomib Volume of Distribution (Vss)

Vss represents the volume into which the drug distributes into once given to the patient at steady-state. This volume parameter provides a measure of where in the body the drug is going, based on fluid volume. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1, and cycle 3 day 1 (an average of 61 days); and Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours post dose

InterventionLiter (Geometric Mean)
Before VandetanibAfter Vandetanib
Phase 11167749

[back to top]

Comparison of Steady State Vandetanib Exposure With Relevant Literature Values

"Because vandetanib PK exposure was only measured during a single 8-hr window during daily dosing, the only comparison to assess the effect of bortezomib is to compare these values to published literature." (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 day 1 (an average of 60 days); and Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours post dose

Interventionng/mL/mg (Mean)
Published LiteratureStudy 090089 Results
Phase 1 - Vandetanib and Bortezomib4.773.96

[back to top]

Maximum Bortezomib Plasma Concentration Normalized to Dose (Cmax/D)

Geometric mean for Bortezomib pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters both before (cycle 1 day 1) and during steady-state Vandetanib (cycle 3 day 1; exposures are dose normalized). Bortezomib plasma concentrations were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS assay with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 1 ng/mL. Only measured concentrations above the LLOQ were used in the calculation of PK parameters. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was recorded as observed values. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1, and cycle 3 day 1 (an average of 61 days); and Pre-dose, 1, 2,4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hours post dose

Interventionng/mL/mg (Geometric Mean)
Before VandetanibAfter Vandetanib
Phase 1 - Vandetanib and Bortezomib0.981.92

[back to top]

Response Rate (Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) of Adults With a Diagnosis of MTC Treated With Either of Two Regimens: (1) Daily Oral Vandetanib and Bortezomib or (2) Daily Oral Vandetanib

Comparison of response between cohorts 1, 2A and 2B was to be determined by computed tomography scan reviews using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete response is disappearance of all target lesions. Partial response is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: 2-3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete ResponsePartial Response
Phase 106
Phase 2A00

[back to top]

Phase 2: Progression Free Survival in Adults With a Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Cancer (MTC) Treated With Daily Oral Vandetanib and Bortezomib

"Progression free survival is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression. Progression is assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and is defined as the appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Although a clear progression of non-target lesions only is exceptional, the opinion of the treating physician should prevail in such circumstances, and the progression status should be confirmed at a later time by the review panel (or Principal Investigator)." (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: 4 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2 A - Vandetanib and Bortezomib at the MTD3.67

[back to top]

Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Bortezomib

Total systemic clearance = dose/area under curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf.). This measurement represents the rate at which plasma is systematically cleared of drug. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1, and cycle 3 day 1 (an average of 61 days); and Pre-dose and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours post dose

InterventionL/hr (Geometric Mean)
Before VandetanibAfter Vandetanib
Phase 178.742.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Here is the number of participants with adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. For the detailed list of adverse events see the adverse event module. (NCT00923247)
Timeframe: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 7 years and 9 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 121
Phase 2 A0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the time (in months) from the date of first documentation of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD), relapse from CR or death related to disease. For a participant who has not progressed and is not known to have died due to disease under study at the end of his/her study follow-up or at the time of start of an alternate therapy (whichever is first), duration of response is censored at the last overall response assessment that is stable disease or better, and which is prior to the start of the alternate therapy, if any. Disease response was assessed using IWG-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. CR=Disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR=Regression of measurable disease and no new sites and PD= any new lesion or increase by > 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: Median Follow-up of 34.3 months for RCHOP arm and 34.4 months for Vc-RCHOP arm

Interventionmonths (Median)
RCHOPNA
Vc-RCHOPNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. A participant who is alive at the end of his/her study follow-up is censored at the date of last contact. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: Median Follow-up of 34.3 months for RCHOP arm and 34.4 months for Vc-RCHOP arm

Interventionmonths (Median)
RCHOPNA
Vc-RCHOPNA

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Patients With Non-germinal Center B-cell-like (Non-GCB) Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

PFS is defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause. The date of progression is the earliest date of a computed tomography/positron emission tomography (CT/PET) scan that shows evidence of PD. For a participant that has not progressed and is alive at the end of his/her study follow-up or at the time of start of an alternate therapy (whichever is first), PFS is censored at the last overall response assessment that is stable disease or better, and which is prior to the start of the alternate therapy, if any. Disease response was assessed using International Working Group (IWG)-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. PD= any new lesion or increase by > 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: Median Follow-up of 34.3 months for RCHOP arm and 34.4 months for Vc-RCHOP arm

Interventionmonths (Median)
RCHOPNA
Vc-RCHOPNA

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival Rate

PFS is defined as the time in months from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause. The date of progression is the earliest date of a computed tomography/positron emission tomography (CT/PET) scan that shows evidence of PD. For a participant that has not progressed and is alive at the end of his/her study follow-up or at the time of start of an alternate therapy (whichever is first), PFS is censored at the last overall response assessment that is stable disease or better, and which is prior to the start of the alternate therapy, if any. Disease response was assessed using International Working Group (IWG)-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. PD= any new lesion or increase by > 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. The progression-free survival rate is defined as the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimate of progression-free survival at 2 years. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: 2 Years (Median Follow-up of 34.3 months for RCHOP arm and 34.4 months for Vc-RCHOP arm)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
RCHOP78
Vc-RCHOP82

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease, relapse from CR, or death related to disease under study if participant did not have any documentation of disease progression prior to death caused by lymphoma or complications thereof. For a participant who has not progressed and is not known to have died due to disease under study at the end of his/her study follow-up or at the time of start of an alternate therapy (whichever is first), TTP is censored at the last overall response assessment that is stable disease or better, and which is prior to the start of the alternate therapy, if any. Disease response was assessed using International Working Group (IWG)-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. PD= any new lesion or increase by > 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: Median Follow-up of 34.3 months for RCHOP arm and 34.4 months for Vc-RCHOP arm

Interventionmonths (Median)
RCHOPNA
Vc-RCHOPNA

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Complete Response Rate is defined as the percentage of participants with the best response of Complete Response (CR). Disease response was assessed using International Working Group (IWG)-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. CR=Disappearance of all evidence of disease. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: End of Cycle 2, End of Treatment (Cycle 6) [Median of 16 weeks on treatment]

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of Cycle 2End of Treatment (Cycle 6)Best Complete Response Rate
RCHOP234549
Vc-RCHOP165656

[back to top]

Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) Negative Rate

FDG-PET negative rate is defined as the percentage of participants FDG-PET negative at the given time-point. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: End of Cycle 2 and End of Treatment (Cycle 6) [Median of 16 weeks on treatment]

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of Cycle 2End of Treatment (Cycle 6)
RCHOP4253
Vc-RCHOP3759

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with the best overall response complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). Disease response was assessed using International Working Group (IWG)-revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. CR=disappearance of all evidence of disease and PR=regression of measurable disease and no new sites. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: End of Cycle 2, End of Treatment (Cycle 6) [Median of 16 weeks on treatment]

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
End of Cycle 2End of Treatment (Cycle 6)Best Overall Response Rate
RCHOP938898
Vc-RCHOP908496

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory Values Grade 3 or Higher

Percentage of participants who shifted from a National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Grade 0, 1, or 2 at Baseline to a Grade 3 or higher on study (worst post-baseline grade). Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, Grade 4=Life-threatening consequences and 5=Death related to AE. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: Days 1, 4 and 10 of each cycle and end of treatment visit (Median of 16 weeks on treatment)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
LymphocytesWBC CountNeutrophilsPlateletsHemoglobinHyperglycemiaHypokalemiaHypophosphatemiaHyponatremiaAlanine aminotransferase (ALT) increasedAspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased
RCHOP706865181014137421
Vc-RCHOP866970391591410312

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Category

Percentage of participants in the following categories: • At least 1 TEAE • Drug-related, TEAEs • Grade 3 or higher TEAEs. Grade 3 are AEs of Severe Intensity • Grade 3 or higher drug-related, TEAEs • TEAEs resulting in study drug discontinuation • Serious TEAEs An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. (NCT00931918)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (Up to 26 Weeks)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
At Least 1 TEAEDrug-related, TEAEsGrade 3 or higher TEAEsGrade 3 or Higher Drug-related, TEAEsTEAEs Resulting in Study Drug DiscontinuationSerious TEAEs
RCHOP100887155431
Vc-RCHOP99957968634

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00937495)
Timeframe: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Vorinostat, Bortezomib)16.4

[back to top]

Confirmed Tumor Responses

"The number of confirmed tumor responses is defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) on two consecutive evaluations at least six weeks apart.~Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimension (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD." (NCT00937495)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)
Treatment (Vorinostat, Bortezomib)00

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration to the time of progression or death, whichever comes first. The distribution and median of progression-free survival times will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT00937495)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Treatment (Vorinostat, Bortezomib)1.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Rate

Overall survival in participants with multiple myeloma treated with Bortezomib (Velcade®) containing conditioning regimen and autologous as well as allogeneic transplantation. (NCT00948922)
Timeframe: End of 2 year, post transplant follow-up

Interventionpercentage (Number)
A: Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant79.2
B: Autologous Stem Cell Transplant89.2
BE: Group B Expansion97.3

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS: Number of participants, per treatment arm with progression free survival at time of analysis. Survival time will be measured from the date of transplant to the date of progression, death or the last follow-up, whichever comes first. Progressive Disease (PD): Increase of ≥ 25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: Serum M-component and/or; Urine M-component and/or; Only in patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels; the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels. The absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL; Bone marrow plasma cell percentage; absolute percentage ≥ 10%; Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT00948922)
Timeframe: End of 2 year, post transplant follow-up

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
A: Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant17
B: Autologous Stem Cell Transplant25
BE: Group B Expansion19

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Acute or Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease (GVHD) Following Transplant

Percentage of participants with Acute or Chronic GVHD following transplant (NCT00948922)
Timeframe: End of 2 year, post transplant follow-up

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A: Allogenic Stem Cell Transplant34

[back to top]

Response Rate

Response rate to regimen defined as the percentage of number of complete response or partial response in total number of participants treated. The response assessed after the first 2 cycles. Response (complete and partial remission) according to International Workshop Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A complete response is the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. A partial response is regression of measurable disease and no new sites of disease. Stable disease is failure to attain a complete response/partial response or progressive disease. A cycle is 21 days with 6-8 cycles administered depending on response. (NCT00958256)
Timeframe: Evaluation of disease after 2 cycles (approximately 6 weeks).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Progressive Disease (PD)Stable Disease (SD)
Bortezomib With Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab520195

[back to top]

Overall Response After 3 Cycles of Botezomib Plus ICE (BICE) Versus Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (ICE) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Response rates for Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (BICE) and Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (ICE) treatment groups were assessed by the 1999 International Working Group (IWG)(CT alone) (Cheson et al., 1999) and compared to 2007 IWG (CT plus PET) (Cheson et al., 2007) criteria. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR (NCT00967369)
Timeframe: From baseline to 3 cycles of treatment

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Overall ResponseComplete Response (CR)Partial Response (PR)Progressive Disease (PD)Stable Disease (SD)
BICE (Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide)73401
ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide)61503

[back to top]

PET Scan Response After 3 Cycles of BICE Versus ICE Chemotherapy.

Response rates for BICE and ICE treatment groups will be assessed by 1999 IWG (CT alone) (Cheson et al., 1999) and compared to 2007 IWG (CT plus PET) (Cheson et al., 2007) criteria. (NCT00967369)
Timeframe: Baseline up to 1 year

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
PET negativity : Complete Response (CR)PET negativity : Partial Response (PR)PET negativity : Stable Disease (SD)PET positivity : Partial Response (PR)PET positivity : Stable Disease (SD)PET positivity : Progressive Disease (PD)
BICE (Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide)300412
ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide)641220

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months

Progression free survival time is defined as the time interval from treatment start to progression or death due to any cause whichever happens first. Participants will be censored at the last follow-up date, if an event(progression/death) is not observed during the follow-up. (NCT00967369)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
BICE (Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide)50
ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide)70

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 24 Months

Overall Survival is time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up within 24 months. (NCT00967369)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
BICE (Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide)70
ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide)89

[back to top]

Skeletal Survey for New Osteolytic Lesions/Fractures

Skeletal survey was measured using conventional radiography [imaging of the whole skeleton (skull, cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, pelvis, humeri, femoral bones)] on day 21 of cycle 8 (day 168) (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: day 168

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid0

[back to top]

Bone Remodelling

Bone remodelling was studied by the measurement of the following serum indices on day 21 of cycle 4 (day 84) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) bone formation marker [bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP)]. (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: day 84

InterventionU/L (Median)
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid22.5

[back to top]

Bone Pain

"Bone pain was measured with the use of the Visual Analogue Scale on day 21 of cycle 8 (day 168).~Bone pain was measured with the use of the Visual Analogue Scale. The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.~The VAS for Bone Pain was constructed as follows:~None Mild Moderate Severe Worst possible 1,2 3,4 5,6 7,8 9,10 Lower values are considered to be of a better outcome, higher values are considered to be of a worst outcome." (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: On the day 168

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid0.3

[back to top]

Bone Remodelling

Bone remodelling was studied by the measurement of the following serum indices on day 21 of cycle 4 (day 84) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): bone formation marker [bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bALP) ]. (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: day 168

InterventionU/L (Median)
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid24.8

[back to top]

Bone Pain

"Bone pain was measured with the use of the Visual Analogue Scale on day 21 of cycle 4 (day 84).~Bone pain was measured with the use of the Visual Analogue Scale. The visual analogue scale or visual analog scale (VAS) is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.~The VAS for Bone Pain was constructed as follows:~None Mild Moderate Severe Worst possible 1,2 3,4 5,6 7,8 9,10 Lower values are considered to be of a better outcome, higher values are considered to be of a worst outcome." (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: On the day 84

Interventionunits on a scale (Median)
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid1.5

[back to top]

Skeletal Survey for New Osteolytic Lesions/Fractures

Skeletal survey was measured using conventional radiography [imaging of the whole skeleton (skull, cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, pelvis, humeri, femoral bones)] every 6 months for up to 18 months (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid0

[back to top]

Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

BMD of the lumbar spine (L1-L4, anteroposterior view) and femoral neck (FN) was measured by Dual Energy X-Absorptiometry scan (DEXA-scan) using a Hologic QDR-1000 scanner on day 21 of cycle 8 (day 168) (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: day 168

InterventionT-score (Median)
Lumbar spine (L1-L4)Femoral neck (FN)
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid1.63-1.44

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

BMD of the lumbar spine (L1-L4, anteroposterior view) and femoral neck (FN) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a Hologic QDR-1000 scanner on day 21 of cycle 4 (day 84) (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: day 84

InterventionT-scores (Median)
Lumbar spine (L1-L4)Femoral neck (FN)
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid0.14-2.68

[back to top]

Bone Remodelling

Bone remodelling was studied by the measurement of the following serum indices on day 21 of cycle 4 (day 84) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): i) bone resorption marker C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX) and ii) bone formation markers [osteocalcin (OC)]. (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: day 84

Interventionng/ml (Median)
CTXOC
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid0.257.4

[back to top]

Bone Remodelling

Bone remodelling was studied by the measurement of the following serum indices on day 21 of cycle 8 (day 168) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): i) bone resorption marker C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX) and ii) bone formation marker [osteocalcin (OC)]. (NCT00972959)
Timeframe: day 168

Interventionng/ml (Median)
CTXOC
Bortezomib/Dexamethasone/Zoledronic Acid0.1710.2

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

(NCT00980395)
Timeframe: Two years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
VCR (Velcade, Cladribine and Rituximab)8

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival at 2 Years

PFS was calculated from the first dose of study drug to the first documentation of disease progression, death regardless of cause, or change in therapy due to disease progression, whichever occurred first. If disease progression did not occur by the end of treatment, patients were evaluated every 3 months until progression with physical examination, laboratory studies, and conventional computed tomographic imaging, up to a maximum of 2 years. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method will be used to estimate progression-free survival in the presence of censoring. (NCT00980395)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
VCR (Velcade, Cladribine and Rituximab)15

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 2 Years

(NCT00980395)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
VCR (Velcade, Cladribine and Rituximab)18

[back to top]

Partial Response

(NCT00980395)
Timeframe: Two years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
VCR (Velcade, Cladribine and Rituximab)14

[back to top]

Bone Anabolic Effect of Bortezomib in Patients With Smoldering Myeloma.

The primary endpoint is the change in bone Alkaline Phosphatase at baseline and 6 weeks. (NCT00983346)
Timeframe: Baseline and 6 weeks

InterventionPercentage of Baseline Value (Number)
% Base Line Patient 1% Base Line Patient 3% Base Line Patient 4% Base Line Patient 6% Base Line Patient 7% Base Line Patient 8% Base Line Patient 10% Base Line Patient 11% Base Line Patient 13% Base Line Patient 14% Base Line Patient 15% Base Line Patient 16% Base Line Patient 17
Arm 1 Bortezomib1781051059995119128841251209698431

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Phase 1)

Safety assessments will be evaluated as the proportion of patients experiencing the following: treatment-related grade 3 or higher toxicity (hematologic and nonhematologic) and treatment-related death. (NCT00985907)
Timeframe: Up to 2 cycles of treatment, approximately 56 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Doxil® + Melphalan + Velcade (DMV)0

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bortezomib (JNJ-26866138 Alone) - Phase I

Cmax of bortezomib following intravenous administration of JNJ-26866138 at dose of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.3 mg/m2 on Cycle 1/Day 25 (JNJ-26866138 alone) (NCT00985959)
Timeframe: Day 25 of Cycle 1

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 0.7 mg/m2 Group45.43
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 1.0 mg/m2 Group59.42
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 1.3 mg/m2 Group120.3

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bortezomib (JNJ-26866138 in Combination With Melphalan and Prednisolone) - Phase I

Cmax of bortezomib following intravenous administration of JNJ-26866138 at dose of 0.7, 1.0, and 1.3 mg/m2 on Cycle 2/Day 4 (combination with melphalan and prednisolone) (NCT00985959)
Timeframe: Day 4 of Cycle 2

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 0.7 mg/m2 Group34.40
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 1.0 mg/m2 Group69.50
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 1.3 mg/m2 Group88.87

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Melphalan - Phase I

Cmax of melphalan at dose of 9 mg/m2 on Cycle 2/Day 4 (NCT00985959)
Timeframe: Day 4 of Cycle 2

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Melphalan100.2

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Prednisolone - Phase I

Cmax of Prednisolone at dose of 60 mg/m2 on Cycle 2/Day 4 (NCT00985959)
Timeframe: Day 4 of Cycle 2

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Prednisolone1131

[back to top]

Median Time to First Response - Phase II

Time to first response is the duartion of time required to achieve first response to treatment (NCT00985959)
Timeframe: up to 54 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Phase II - JNJ-26866138 1.3 mg/m2 Group51

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity During the Phase I (Cycle 1)

Dose limiting toxicity defined as an adverse event or adverse drug reaction experienced by the participants during 6 weeks of treatment Cycle 1 (NCT00985959)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 0.7 mg/m2 Group0
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 1.0 mg/m2 Group0
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 1.3 mg/m2 Group1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Response (Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) - Phase I and II

Response is evaluated as per the criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (Blade et al. 1998). CR: disappearance of the original monoclonal protein from the blood and urine and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow on at least 2 determinations for a minimum of 6 weeks; no increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas for at least 6 weeks. PR: ≥50% reduction in the level of serum monoclonal protein for at least 2 determinations 6 weeks apart; If present, reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion by either ≥90% or to <200 mg for at least 2 determinations 6 weeks apart; ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas for at least 6 weeks; no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions (NCT00985959)
Timeframe: 54 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 0.7 mg/m2 Group6
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 1.0 mg/m2 Group5
Phase I - JNJ-26866138 1.3 mg/m2 Group4
Phase II - JNJ-26866138 1.3 mg/m2 Group60
Total71

[back to top]

Overall Survival (in Days)

(NCT00990652)
Timeframe: Days 1, 4, 8 pre-surgery, once per cycle (every 4 weeks) while on treatment post-surgery, and then every 3 months up to 2 years during follow-up

Interventiondays (Median)
Bortezomib + Temozolomide248

[back to top]

Number of Grade 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Adverse Events Observed During Study Treatment (Defined by CTCAE v 3.0)

"Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. In general, AEs are graded according to the following:~Grade 1 Mild AE Grade 2 Moderate AE Grade 3 Severe AE Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 Death related to AE" (NCT00990652)
Timeframe: Days 1, 4, 8 pre-surgery, and then at the start of every cycle (approximately every 4 weeks) post-surgery while on treatment

Interventionadverse events (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
Bortezomib + Temozolomide80301110

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate at 6 Months

The rate of overall survival at 6 months (regardless of disease progression) was calculated. (NCT00990652)
Timeframe: After 6 months on study

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + Temozolomide69

[back to top]

Number of Patients Surviving Without Disease Progression After 6 Months

"Patients will be monitored from date of first treatment to the date of first observation of progressive disease, non-reversible neurologic progression or increasing steroid requirements, death due to any cause, or early discontinuation of treatment. Progression-free survival will be defined as the absence of any of the above after 6 months.~Progression (defined by MacDonald Criteria) is a 25% increase in the sum of products of all measurable lesions over smallest sum observed compared to baseline, OR clear worsening of any evaluable disease, OR appearance of any new lesion/site, OR failure to return for evaluation due to death or deteriorating condition (unless clearly unrelated to the cancer)." (NCT00990652)
Timeframe: From date of first treatment until disease progression, death, or early discontinuation of treatment (up to 24 months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib + Temozolomide0

[back to top]

Number of Participants Achieving a Response to Treatment (Either Complete or Partial Response) as Defined by MacDonald Criteria

"This measure was assessed only in patients who had residual tumor post-operatively. Per MacDonald Criteria:~Complete Response requires complete disappearance of all measurable & evaluable disease, no new lesions, no evidence of non-evaluable disease, and only minimal or no use of steroids.~Partial Response is defined as >= 50% decrease compared to baseline in the sum of products of perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions, no progression of evaluable disease, and no new lesions. Responders must be on the same or decreasing doses of steroid.~Response was assessed by imaging (MRI or CT with contrast)." (NCT00990652)
Timeframe: Day of treatment post-surgery and then approximately every 8 weeks thereafter until off treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortezomib + Temozolomide0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Number of patients alive who received maintenance therapy (NCT00992446)
Timeframe: 6.64 Years Post-Transplant

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AliveDead
Treatment (Chemotherapy, ASCT, Bortezomib, Vorinostat))163

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Number of patients alive without disease progression/relapse (NCT00992446)
Timeframe: 6.64 Years Post-Transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Alive without disease porgressionalive with disease progression
Treatment (Chemotherapy, ASCT, Bortezomib, Vorinostat))145

[back to top]

Toxicity of Vorinostat Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy After Autologous Transplant

Number of patients on maintenance therapy post-transplant who experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity per NCI-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3. The first three months of bortezomib and vorinostat therapy will be used as the time period to evaluate toxicity for stopping rules of the study. Toxicity that meets stopping rules will be determined based on the number of patients that are withdrawn from study for significant toxicity (grade IV, non-hematological, non-metabolic, non-peripheral neuropathy). (NCT00992446)
Timeframe: 3 months after start of maintenance therapy

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, ASCT, Bortezomib, Vorinostat))19

[back to top]

Median Time to Disease Progression

median days from transplant to relapse/progression (NCT00992446)
Timeframe: time post ASCT to progression

Interventionyears (Median)
Treatment (Chemotherapy, ASCT, Bortezomib, Vorinostat))1.05

[back to top]

Survival at 1 Year

Overall Survival at 12 months from completion of radiation treatment (NCT00998010)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Median)
Experimental87.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Estimate the overall survival in subjects with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) treated with bortezomib/temozolomide/radiation followed by bortezomib/temozolomide for 24 cycles until progression is detected or for up to 24 cycles (~2 years). (NCT00998010)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Experimental19.1

[back to top]

Toxicity Assessed According to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.

(NCT00998010)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Radiotherapy phase72241098Post Radiotherapy phase72241098Follow-up phase72241098
Grade 4 Toxicity< Grade 3 ToxicityGrade 3 toxicity
Experimental6
Experimental1
Experimental17
Experimental7
Experimental0
Experimental24

[back to top]

Tumor Progression as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Neurologic Exam

MRI will be done 2 weeks after completion of radiation and then every 8 weeks. Neurologic exam to be performed every 2 weeks during radiation therapy, then every every 4 weeks after radiation is completed. (NCT00998010)
Timeframe: at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months from completion of radiation treatment.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Median)
Progression Free Survival rate at 6 monthsProgression Free Survival rate at 12 monthsProgression Free Survival rate at 18 monthsProgression Free Survival rate at 24 moths
Experimental54.229.225.025

[back to top]

Time to Progression

"Median time to tumor progression. Because many newly-diagnosed patients are likely not to have evaluable disease due to gross total resections. A 7-point scale was used to guide Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment to determine progression in this study. A -2 or -3 assessment will be taken as progression.~The 7-point scale is listed below. complete resolution of tumor: 3 tumor definitely smaller: 2 tumor probably smaller: 1 tumor unchanged: 0 tumor probably worse: -1 tumor definitely worse: -2 new lesion: -3" (NCT00998010)
Timeframe: From the completion of radiation treatment to tumor progression

Interventionmonths (Median)
Experimental6.2

[back to top]

Efficacy of Treatment as Measured by Best Overall Response

-The response definitions used for this study are the 2007 Cheson criteria. (NCT01000285)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years following completion of therapy

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Progressive DiseaseStable diseasePartial responseComplete response
EPOCH Chemotherapy & Bortezomib3393

[back to top]

Effects of on HTLV-1 DNA After Treatment as Measured by Proviral Loads

(NCT01000285)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventioncopies/peripheral blood mononuclear cell (Mean)
BaselineStudy completion
Non-responders0.4170.033
Responders0.3720.0128

[back to top]

Effects of HTLV-1 RNA Load After Treatment as Measured by Hbz Messenger RNA

(NCT01000285)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventioncopies/peripheral blood mononuclear cell (Mean)
BaselineStudy completion
Non-responders41.935.7
Responders37.07.33

[back to top]

Effects of HTLV-1 Integration Sites After Treatment

(NCT01000285)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionnumber of integration sites (Mean)
BaselineStudy completion
EPOCH Chemotherapy & Bortezomib1.311.00

[back to top]

Effects of HTLV-1 Integrase Gene Sequence After Treatment as Measured by Nucleotide Divergence

(NCT01000285)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionpercentage of nucleotide divergence (Mean)
BaselineStudy completion
EPOCH Chemotherapy & Bortezomib0.490.52

[back to top]

Time to Progression

-The progression definitions used for this study are from the 2007 Cheson criteria. (NCT01000285)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years following completion of therapy

Interventiondays (Median)
Best response of complete responseBest response of partial responseBest response of stable diseaseAll participants
EPOCH Chemotherapy & Bortezomib19914388127

[back to top]

Tolerability of Treatment as Measured by Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 will be utilized for all toxicity reporting. (NCT01000285)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after completion of treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
FatigueVomitingSpontaneous bacterial peritonitisAbdominal distensionHemoglobinLeukocytes (WBC)LymphopeniaNeutrophilsPlateletsInfection without neutropeniaInfection with neutropeniaOmaya port infectionIV port infectionSepsisNeutropenic feverHypoglycemiaHyperglycemiaMagnesiumHypokalemiaHypertriglyceridemiaConfusionHeadacheEncephalitisAbdominal painCoughDyspnea
EPOCH Chemotherapy & Bortezomib11126716611112312111111111

[back to top]

Relation of NFκB Gene Expression Profile on Response

Standard error represents the standard error of the fold expression of protein coding transcripts for each gene indicated. (NCT01000285)
Timeframe: 6 months

,,,,,,,
Interventionfold expression (Mean)
BLKCADMICD25CD4CD45
Patient A (Responder) Post-Therapy0.1780.0110.0351.3801.718
Patient A (Responder) Pre-Therapy1.0001.0001.0001.0001.000
Patient B (Responder) Post-Therapy0.1720.0070.0150.6070.959
Patient B (Responder) Pre-Therapy0.8890.6230.3031.4372.049
Patient C (Non-responder) Post-Therapy77.5901.8160.6911.9231.640
Patient C (Non-responder) Pre-Therapy68.8561.4940.8621.3191.163
Patient D (Non-responder) Post-Therapy46.8010.4700.5120.6480.714
Patient D (Non-responder) Pre-Therapy233.1792.0132.8973.0570.594

[back to top]

Percent Difference Between Area Under Curve (AUC) and Target AUC

A test dose of IV busulfan 0.8 mg/kg was infused at Baseline (Day -12 to -9) to verify a target busulfan integrated AUC of 20,000 μM*min with a range of 16,000 to 24,000. If necessary the dose could be adjusted. The PK-directed dose recommendation based on the test dose was administered at Day -5. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at 0, 15, 30 minutes after the End of Infusion and 240, 300, 360 minutes after start of the infusion. GC-MS was used to determine the busulfan level in plasma. The percent difference was calculated between AUC and the Target AUC. (NCT01009840)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -12 to -9), Day -5

InterventionPercent difference (Median)
IV Busulfan-0.22

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival was defined as the time in days from transplantation to death due to all causes. (NCT01009840)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionDays (Median)
IV BusulfanNA

[back to top]

Percent Change in IV Busulfan Dose

The percent change in dose is relative to the busulfan dose administered at the Baseline Visit (Day -12 to -9) when a dose of 0.8 mg/kg was administered and on Day -5 when the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance recommended PK-adjusted dose was administered. (NCT01009840)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -12 to -9), Day -5

InterventionPercent change (Median)
IV Busulfan7.55

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease Based on Baltimore Criteria

The Baltimore criteria for veno-occlusive disease was defined as the development of hyperbilirubinemia with serum bilirubin > 2 mg/dl within 21 days after transplantation and at least 2 of the following clinical signs and symptoms: (1) hepatomegaly, usually painful, (2) > 5% weight gain, or (3) ascites. (NCT01009840)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
IV Busulfan0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Disease Response at Month 6

The percentage of participants reported in each disease category by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria for Multiple Myeloma 6 months after autologous Hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Overall Disease Response categories were: [stringent Complete Response (sCR)=CR + normal Free Light Chain (FLC) ratio + absence of clonal cells in bone marrow], [Complete Response (CR)=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow], [Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)=Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hour], [Partial Response (PR)=≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hour], [Stable Disease (SD)=Not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR or progressive disease] or [Progressive Disease (PD)]. (NCT01009840)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
sCR or CR or VGPRPR or SD or PDNot Assessed
IV Busulfan20.070.010.0

[back to top]

Ratio Area Under Curve (AUC)/Target AUC

A test dose of IV busulfan 0.8 mg/kg was infused at Baseline (Day -12 to -9) to verify a target busulfan integrated AUC of 20,000 μM*min with a range of 16,000 to 24,000. If necessary the dose could be adjusted. The PK-directed dose recommendation based on the test dose was administered at Day -5. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at 0, 15, 30 minutes after the End of Infusion and 240, 300, 360 minutes after start of the infusion. Gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MS) was used to determine the busulfan level in plasma. The ratio was calculated: AUC/Target AUC. (NCT01009840)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day -12 to -9), Day -5

InterventionRatio (Median)
IV Busulfan1.00

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free Survival (PFS) defined as the time from transplantation to the occurrence of the event that was death or first recurrence of progressive disease (PD) by IMWG criteria. PD was defined as an Increase of ≥25% from the lowest response value in any one or more of the following: 1)Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL), 2)Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24 hr), 3)In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels; the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels. The absolute increase must be >10 mg/dL, 4)Bone marrow plasma cell percentage; the absolute percentage must be ≥10%, 5)Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas and/or 6)Development of hypercalcaemia that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative diso (NCT01009840)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionDays (Median)
IV Busulfan191

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival Events

Progression-free survival events are death or first recurrence of progressive disease by International Myeloma Working Group Criteria. (NCT01009840)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
IV Busulfan50.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival Events

Overall Survival Event was death. (NCT01009840)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
IV Busulfan13.3

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System : FACT/GOG-NTX-Change From Baseline by Treatment Group

Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System and focuses on four general quality of life domains for physical well being, functional well-being, social/family well-being, and emotional well-being, and includes additional items to characterize treatment-related neurotoxicity. Higher subscales/total scores represent higher QOL. In the case of the neurotoxicity subscale, lower scores correspond to higher neurotoxicity. The recall period referenced in the questionnaire is the past 7 days.Ranges for FACT-G subscales are as follows:.PWB, scale 0 -28, , NtxS scale 0-44, FACT/GOG-Ntx trial outcome index scale is 0-100 and FACT-G scale is also scaled 0-100. An increase from baseline in these scores indicate improvement. (NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 12, 24 and 48 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Neurotoxicity wk 12 change baseline (n=212,240)Neurotoxicity wk 24 change baseline (n=148,174)Neurotoxicity wk 48 change baseline (n=35,26)Physical wellbeing wk 12 chge (n=215,240)Physical wellbeingwk 24 chge (n=150,176)Physical wellbeing wk 48 chge (n=38,26)Trial Outcomes wk 12 chge (n=209,236)Trial Outcomes wk 24 chge (n=148,173)Trial Outcomes wk 48 chge (n=35,26)FACT-G Total wk 12 chge (n=213,240)FACT-G Totalwk 24 chge (n=147,175)FACT-G Total wk 48 chge (n=37,26)FACT/GOGNTX Total wk 12 chge (n=206,230)FACT/GOGNTX Total wk 24 chge (n=146,172)FACT/GOGNTX Total wk 48 chge (n=35,26)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib-4.481-4.564-3.158-3.29-3.044-2.037-10.573-9.84-6.633-6.658-6.076-2.704-11.176-10.581-5.871
Placebo + Bortezomib-3.337-4.739-2.133-1.952-2.2590.203-6.874-8.894-2.821-4.106-4.609-1.435-7.524-9.179-3.151

[back to top]

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC) QLQ-MY20-Change From Baseline by Treatment Group

"Higher values in the disease symptoms and side effects of treatment scores indicate worsening. Higher scores in the future perspective and body image scores indicate improvement. LS Means and SEM are estimated from the repeated measures model. Following factors and covariates are included in the repeated measurement model: time, treatment, treatment by time interaction, number of prior lines of anti-MM therapy (1/ 2 and 3), prior use of BTZ (Yes/ No), baseline score.Disease Symptom is the sum of 20 questions, total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 100 (worst possible outcome), All subscales of EORTC QLQ-MY20 have the same score range of 0 -100. Decrease in symptom scores from baseline indicate improvement in symptoms." (NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 12, 24 and 48 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Disease Symptom wk 12 change baseline (n=215,243)Disease Symptom wk 24 change baseline (n=148,177)Disease Symptom wk 48 change baseline (n=37,26)Side effects of treatment wk 12 chge (n=213,242)Side effects of treatment wk 24 chge (n=148,175)Side effects of treatment wk 48 chge (n=37,26)Future perspective wk 12 chge (n=214,242)Future perspective wk 24 chge (n=148,176)Future perspective wk 48 chge (n=37,26)Body image wk 12 chge (n=213,240)Body image wk 24 chge (n=147,175)Body image wk 48 chge (n=37,26)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib-4.795-4.401-2.8368.1629.0163.3575.3193.8774.331-7.178-11.463-2.161
Placebo + Bortezomib-4.865-6.797-6.6265.5247.7313.6546.1945.8396.951-6.22-7.358-4.666

[back to top]

Time to Response Per Investigator Assessment (mEBMT Criteria) of Response Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.

(NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 45 months

Interventiontime to response in months (Median)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib1.51
Placebo + Bortezomib2.00

[back to top]

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC ) QLQ-C30 - Summary Statistics by Treatment Group

"The EORTC QLQ-C30 measures functional dimensions (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single-item symptom scales (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QoL scale. Disease Symptom is the sum of 30 questions, total score ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 100 (worst possible outcome), All subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 have the same score range of 0 -100. For global health status and other functional scales,an increase from baseline indicates improvement of QoL. Whereas for symptoms scales, fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation and diarrhea, decrease in scores from baseline indicate improvement in symptoms." (NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 12, 24 and 48 weeks

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Global health wk 12 change baseline (n=216,239)Global health wk 24 change baseline (n=150,176)Global health wk 48 change baseline (n=38,26)Physical functioning wk 12 chge (n=217,242)Physical functioning wk 24 chge (n=151,177)Physical functioning wk 48 chge (n=38,26)Role functioning wk 12 chge (n=215,237)Role functioning wk 24 chge (n=150,176)Role functioning wk 48 chge (n=38,26)Cognitive functioning wk 12 chge (n=216,240)Cognitive functioning wk 24 chge (n=149,176)Cognitive functioning wk 48 chge (n=38,26)Social functioning wk 12 chge (n=216,240)Social functioning wk 24 chge (n=148,171)Social functioning wk 48 chge (n=37,26)Fatigue wk 12 chge (n=217,241)Fatigue wk 24 chge (n=151,176)Fatigue wk 48 chge(n=38,26)Dyspnea wk 12 chge (n=217,240)Dyspnea wk 24 chge (n=151,177)Dyspnea wk 48 chge (n=38,26)Insomnia wk 12 chge (n=216,239)Insomnia wk 24 chge (n=149,176)Insomnia wk 48 chge (n=38,26)Appetite loss wk 12 chge (n=217,239)Appetite loss wk 24 chge (n=151,176)Appetite loss wk 48 chge (n=38,26)Constipation wk 12 chge (n=215,240)Constipation wk 24 chge (n=151,177)Constipation wk 48 chge (n=38,25)Diarrhea wk 12 chge (n=217,241)Diarrhea wk 24 chge (n=150,177)Diarrhea wk 48 chge (n=38,26)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib-9.853-7.867-2.986-9.67-9.516-2.88-11.159-11.875-5.927-4.464-6.053-5.568-8.502-8.925-6.10415.12212.6774.64613.9647.9394.1186.28310.023-2.46415.16716.5743.9994.135-0.153-0.35818.88823.16320.48
Placebo + Bortezomib-4.044-1.5184.345-5.393-6.4562.037-6.762-11.263-0.401-1.023-3.542-4.042-3.991-6.3384.6177.9399.203-2.6256.2665.3082.827.6256.104-3.4425.3835.861-2.9636.420.524-0.94610.20616.40610.996

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.

Best overall response based on mEBMT criteria per investigator assessment (NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 45 months

Intervention% participants with response (Number)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib60.7
Placebo + Bortezomib54.6

[back to top]

Duration of Response Per Investigator Assessment (mEBMT Criteria) Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.

(NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 45 months

Interventionduration of response in months (Median)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib13.14
Placebo + Bortezomib10.87

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone

Number of OS events (NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 45 months

InterventionNumber of OS events (Number)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib134
Placebo + Bortezomib152

[back to top]

Overall Survival in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone

survival time in months (NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib40.28
Placebo + Bortezomib35.78

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.

(NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib11.99
Placebo + Bortezomib8.80

[back to top]

Time to Progression/Relapse Per Investigator Assessment (mEBMT Criteria) Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.

(NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib12.71
Placebo + Bortezomib8.54

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival Events in Patients Treated With Panobinostat in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone vs. Patients Treated by Placebo in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone.

(NCT01023308)
Timeframe: 45 months

Interventionnumber of events (Number)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib207
Placebo + Bortezomib260

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival

The Length of Time, in Months, That Patients Were Alive From Their First Date of Protocol Treatment Until Worsening of Their Disease. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01029730)
Timeframe: at 3 and 6 months, then every 3 months post-treatment for 1 year and every 6 months thereafter until disease progression; projected 2 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bendamustine/Bortezomib/RituximabNA

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Percentage of patients experiencing a complete response (CR) per RECIST. CR = disappearance of all target lesions. (NCT01029730)
Timeframe: 18 months

Interventionpercentage of evaluable participants (Number)
Bendamustine/Bortezomib/Rituximab65

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety.

Toxicity grades will be assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.0. Includes adverse events occurring in >1 patient (NCT01029730)
Timeframe: Days 1,8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle for 6 months, then every 3 months for a year, projected 2 years.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
LeukopeniaNeutropeniaLymphopeniaThrombocytopeniaAnemiaPeripheral NeuropathyDiarrheaFatigueNausea/VomitingCoughRashSyncopeHypocalcemia/Hyponatremia
Bendamustine/Bortezomib/Rituximab161694354432222

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

The Percentage of Patients Who Experience an Objective Benefit From Treatment. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI or CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01029730)
Timeframe: At 3 and 6 months during treatment, then 6 months post-treatment.

Interventionpercentage of evaluable participants (Number)
Bendamustine/Bortezomib/Rituximab94

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate to the Combination of MLN8237 and Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

sCR: Normal serum FLC ratio, and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence, negative immunofixation of the serum and urine, <5% plasma cells in bone marrow, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and normalization of FLC ratio. VGPR:PR and serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or if serum measurable,≥90% or greater reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg per 24h and if only measurable non-bone marrow parameter was FLC,≥90% or greater reduction in difference from involved and uninvolved FLC levels. PR:≥50% reduction of serum M-protein or reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24h or if FLC, ≥50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels or ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline percentage was ≥30%, and ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas (NCT01034553)
Timeframe: Every 28 day cycle(up to 10 cycles)

,,,
Interventionpercentage of patients per dose level (Number)
Strong Complete ResponseVery Good Partial ResponsePartial Response
Dose Level 014.3014.3
Dose Level 1033.30
Dose Level 2000
Dose Level 307.723.1

[back to top]

Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) (Phase I)

"Patients were evaluated over the first cycle of treatment for Dose Limiting Toxicities. For this trail DLTs are as follows:~An AE attributed (definitely, probably, or possibly) to study treatment during cycle 1 and the following criteria:~Grade 4 Neutropenia Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia, or grade 3 with bleeding Febrile neutropenia Creatinine serum great than 2 times baseline or upper limit of normal Grade 3 or higher Fatigue Grade 3 or higher nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea Any grade 3 or higher Non-hematologic toxicity per NCI CTCAE V4.0 Inability to initiate the scheduled cycle 2, day 1 due to toxicity~The maximum tolerated dose level (MTD) will be defined as the highest safely tolerated dose." (NCT01034553)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Dose 0**0
Dose 00
Dose 10
Dose 20
Dose 30

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT01034553)
Timeframe: Every 28 day cycle(up to 10 cycles) then follow-up for up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
All Patients23.6

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

(NCT01034553)
Timeframe: Every 28 day cycle(up to 10 cycles) then follow-up for up to 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
All Patients5.9

[back to top]

Rate of Durable Complete Response

Proportion of subjects who achieved a CR with duration of at least 6 months (NCT01040871)
Timeframe: Median follow up approx 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VR-CAP44.7
R-CHOP47.3

[back to top]

Rate of Durable Response

Proportion of subjects who achieved a CR or PR with duration of at least 6 months. Duration of response (CR or PR) was calculated from the date of initial documentation of a response to the date of first documented evidence of disease progression or death due to disease progression. Response was evaluated by an Independent Radiology Review Committee using available computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans collected at Baseline, end of cycle 3, end of cycle 6 (or end of treatment) based on the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. (NCT01040871)
Timeframe: Median follow up approx. 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VR-CAP53.9
R-CHOP67.6

[back to top]

Subsequent Anti-lymphoma Therapy Rate at 1-year

Kaplan-meier estimate of subsequent anti-lymphoma therapy at 1-year. Time to subsequent anti-lymphoma therapy was measured from the date of randomization to the start date of new treatment. Death due to disease progression prior to subsequent therapy was considered as an event. Otherwise, time to next anti-lymphoma treatment was censored at the date of death or the last date known to be alive. (NCT01040871)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VR-CAP71.1
R-CHOP80.2

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate at 1-year

Kaplan-meier estimate of overall survival at 1-year measured from date of randomization. (NCT01040871)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of partipants (Number)
VR-CAP94.1
R-CHOP84.2

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"Overall response = Complete Response (CR) + Partial Response (PR) Response was evaluated by an Independent Radiology Review Committee using available computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans collected at Baseline, end of cycle 3, and end of cycle 6 (or end of treatment) based on the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma.~Complete Response: see primary endpoint Partial Response: At least a 50% decrease in the sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses." (NCT01040871)
Timeframe: 6 cycles

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VR-CAP93.4
R-CHOP98.6

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate

"Complete response was evaluated by an Independent Radiology Review Committee using available computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans collected at Baseline, end of cycle 3, and end of cycle 6 (or end of treatment) based on the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma.~Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy.~PET scan was negative.~The spleen and/or liver, if enlarged before therapy on the basis of physical examination or CT scan, was not palpable on physical examination and was considered normal size by imaging studies; all splenic and hepatic nodules related to lymphomas disappeared.~If bone marrow was involved before treatment, the infiltrate cleared on repeated bone marrow biopsy.~No new sites of disease were detected." (NCT01040871)
Timeframe: 6 cycles

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VR-CAP64.5
R-CHOP63.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)Rate at 1-year

Kaplan-meier estimate of progression-free survival at 1-year. Progression-free survival was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the date of first documented evidence of disease progression or death. (NCT01040871)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionpercentage of partipants (Number)
VR-CAP78.9
R-CHOP83.9

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

Defined as the percent of patients having a complete response (CR) to treatment, assessed using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria. CR=disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and 5% or less plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks for approximately 48 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Original BBD Regimen0
Modified BBD Regimen13

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Defined as the interval of time, in months, from first study treatment until the earlier of the date of death or date last known alive. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks until progressive disease then every 12 weeks, projected 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Original BBD RegimenNA
BBD TreatmentNA

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Experienced Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events

All serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) were assessed using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0, and were collected from start of study treatment until 30 days after last dose of study medication. Refer to the Adverse Event module for specific terms. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: approximately 36 weeks

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
SAEsAEs
Modified BBD Regimen1738
Original BBD Regimen718

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

The number of patients with observed complete or partial response (CR or PR) assessed by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria. PR=50% or greater reduction from baseline in serum M-protein and 90% or greater reduction from baseline in 24-hour urinary M-protein. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: every 4 weeks for approximately 2 years

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPR
Modified BBD Regimen58
Originl BBD Regimen05

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Defined as the interval of time (in months) that patient are alive from date of first protocol treatment to date of documented tumor progression or date of death from any cause. Progressive disease, assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria, is defined as at least a 25% increase from the nadir in any one of the following criteria: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, or bone marrow plasma cell percentage of 10% or greater. (NCT01056276)
Timeframe: every 8 weeks for up to 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Original BBD Regimen11.1
Modified BBD Regimen18.9

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival

Median number of months before disease progressed in patient on gemcitabine when treated with the combination of panobinostat and bortezomib. Progression free survival is measured from randomization until the subject has documented disease progression by an objective measure. Subjects must be alive with no more than 20% increase in tumor size to qualify for progression free survival. Changes in tumor size are defined by RECIST criteria. (NCT01056601)
Timeframe: Up to 1 Year

InterventionMonths (Median)
Pancreatic Cancer Patients2.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants by Tumor Response

Number of patients whose tumor has responded to study therapy is determined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. Progressive Disease (PD) is assessed if the sum of the diameters has increased by ≥ 20% and ≥ 5 mm from nadir (including baseline if it is the smallest sum). Objective response is measured by tumor reduction as defined in the RECIST criteria. Tumor shrinkage must be at least 30% to qualify as an objective response. (NCT01056601)
Timeframe: Up to 1 Year

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Progressive DiseaseNo data availableObjective Response
Pancreatic Cancer Patients520

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is calculated as (Date of First Disease Progression or Death as a Result of any Cause whichever Comes First - Date of First Objective Status Assessment of Confirmed Complete or Partial Response as defined by RECIST criteria). (NCT01056601)
Timeframe: Up to 1 Year

InterventionWeeks (Number)
Pancreatic Cancer Patients0

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival

The percent of participants surviving at 6 months and 1 year. (NCT01058239)
Timeframe: 6 months, 1 year

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 month12 Month
Rituximab Plus Bortezomib8686

[back to top]

Effects of Bortezomib/Rituximab on EBV Quantitative Viral Load

The Mean epstein barr virus (EBV) viral load at the given time points. (NCT01058239)
Timeframe: baseline, 21, 42, 63, 84 days (end of cycles 1, 2, 3, 4)

InterventionLog2[(viral copies/ milliliter blood)+1] (Mean)
BaselineEnd of Cycle 1 (21 days)End of Cycle 2 (42 days)End of Cycle 3 (63 days)End of Cycle 4 (84 days)
Rituximab Plus Bortezomib13.0210.129.118.987.85

[back to top]

Six-Month Progression Free Survival

"Percent of participants with progression free survival (alive without disease progression) six months after registration. Progression was evaluated using the International Working Group criteria for lymphoma response.~> Progressive Disease (PD) or Relapsed Disease (RD):~Appearance of any new lesion > 1.5 cm in any axis during or at end of therapy. Increased Radiolabeled[18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake in a previously unaffected site will be considered PD/RD only after confirmation by other modalities.~≥ 50% increase from nadir in the sum of the products of the largest diameters (SPD) of any previously involved node, or in a single involved node, or in the sizes of other lesions.~≥ 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node > 1 cm in its short axis.~PET (positron emission tomography) positive prior to therapy: post-treatment PET should be positive unless lesion is too small to be detected with current PET sys" (NCT01058239)
Timeframe: six months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Rituximab Plus Bortezomib43

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"Overall response rate includes both complete and partial responses assessed by PET/CT following completion of therapy. Response was evaluated using the International Working Group criteria for lymphoma response. The complete list of criteria used to evaluate response is too long to be detailed in the allotted space here, but response is defined more generally as:~Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy.~Partial Response (PR): ≥ 50% decrease in the sum of the products of the diameters (SPD) of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses." (NCT01058239)
Timeframe: 4 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab Plus Bortezomib3

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"The number of participants with complete responses as assessed by PET/CT following completion of therapy. Response was evaluated using the International Working Group criteria for lymphoma response.~Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy." (NCT01058239)
Timeframe: 4 Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Rituximab Plus Bortezomib3

[back to top]

Maximum Percent Change From Baseline in Intact Parathyroid Hormone Levels on Day 1

All patients received 0.7 mg/m2 of bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21 day cycle, for maximum of three cycles for an average of 18 months. Intact Parathyroid hormone was measured in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma for osteoblast activation. Other bone markers were examined using similar methods. (NCT01062230)
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 1

Intervention% change (Number)
Subject 1Subject 2Subject 3Subject 4Subject 5Subject 6
All Patients113.5-9.0930.7-5093.6-53.5

[back to top]

To Establish the Safety, Tolerability, and RP2D (Phase 1); To Assess the Overall Response Rate in Subjects With Advanced Multiple Myeloma (Phase 2).

"The safety of KW-2478 was determined by reported TEAEs, observed DLTs, changes in PEs, vital sign measurements, ECGs, and laboratory analyses.~The ORR, was defined as the best response over a specified number of cycles (calculated and summarized).~Disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the best response over a specified number of cycles (calculated and summarized). Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the first day of treatment until the date of disease progression or death is first reported (calculated and summarized)." (NCT01063907)
Timeframe: 21 day cycle, up to 52 weeks

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Subjects with Any TEAERelated TEAEModerate (CTCAE 2) TEAESevere (CTCAE 3) TEAELife Threatening TEAESerious Treatment-Emergent AESubjects with Any DLT
Phase 1 & 2: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^29588225413481
Phase 1 Cohort 1: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^23303020
Phase 1 Cohort 2: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^23302130
Phase 1 Cohort 3: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^23202031
Phase 1 Cohort 4: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^26605040
Phase 2: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^28074224212360

[back to top]

Phase 1: PK Exposure Cmax ng/mL Day 11

Descriptive summary statistics (number, arithmetic mean, standard deviation [SDev], coefficient of variation [CV%]) for concentration and PK data for KW-2478 and Bortezomib in Phase 1 were presented by cohort, dose level and day. (NCT01063907)
Timeframe: PK collected Day 11 of 21-day cycle

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Phase 1 Cohort 1: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^27910
Phase 1 Cohort 2: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^241000
Phase 1 Cohort 3: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^25990
Phase 1 Cohort 4: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^25280

[back to top]

Phase 1: PK Elimination t½ hr Day 11

Descriptive summary statistics (number, arithmetic mean, standard deviation [SDev], coefficient of variation [CV%]) for concentration and PK data for KW-2478 and Bortezomib in Phase 1 were presented by cohort, dose level and day. (NCT01063907)
Timeframe: PK collected Day 11 of 21-day cycle

Interventionhr (Mean)
Phase 1 Cohort 1: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^21.88
Phase 1 Cohort 2: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^22.02
Phase 1 Cohort 3: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^21.84
Phase 1 Cohort 4: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^21.77

[back to top]

Phase 1: PK Absorption Tmax hr Day 11

Descriptive summary statistics (number, arithmetic mean, standard deviation [SDev], coefficient of variation [CV%]) for concentration and PK data for KW-2478 and Bortezomib in Phase 1 were presented by cohort, dose level and day. (NCT01063907)
Timeframe: PK collected Day 11 of 21-day cycle

Interventionhr (Mean)
Phase 1 Cohort 1: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^21.03
Phase 1 Cohort 2: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^21.03
Phase 1 Cohort 3: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^21.11
Phase 1 Cohort 4: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^21.07

[back to top]

Phase 1: PK Exposure AUC0-t hr*ng/mL Day 11

Descriptive summary statistics (number, arithmetic mean, standard deviation [SDev], coefficient of variation [CV%]) for concentration and PK data for KW-2478 and Bortezomib in Phase 1 were presented by cohort, dose level and day. (NCT01063907)
Timeframe: PK collected Day 11 of 21-day cycle

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Phase 1 Cohort 1: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^27940
Phase 1 Cohort 2: KW-2478 130 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^226200
Phase 1 Cohort 3: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.0mg/m^27190
Phase 1 Cohort 4: KW-2478 175 mg/m^2 and Bortezomib 1.3mg/m^26040

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Confirmed Hematologic Response

"Response that was confirmed on 2 consecutive evaluations during treatment.~Complete Response(CR): Complete disappearance of M-protein from serum and urine on immunofixation, normalization of Free Light Chain (FLC) ratio and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Very Good Partial Response(VGPR): >=90% reduction in serum M-component; Urine M-Component <=100 mg per 24 hours.~Partial Response(PR): >=50% reduction in serum M-component and/or Urine M-Component >=90% reduction or <200 mg per 24 hours; or >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels." (NCT01072773)
Timeframe: Duration of treatment (up to 12 cycles/months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)Partial Response (PR)
Bortez/Cyc/Dex000

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival

Survival time is defined as the time from registration to death due to any cause. (NCT01072773)
Timeframe: Duration of Study (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bortez/Cyc/Dex1.45

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression

Time to disease progression is defined as the time from registration to the earliest date of documented disease progression. If a patient dies without a documentation of disease progression the patient will be considered to have had tumor progression at the time of their death (NCT01072773)
Timeframe: Duration of Study (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bortez/Cyc/Dex1.45

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an Organ Response.

The number of patients that acheived a response in an affected organ. (NCT01072773)
Timeframe: Duration on treatment (up to 12 cycles/months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Bortez/Cyc/Dex0

[back to top]

One-year Survival in Patients Treated With This Regimen.

Proportion of patients who are still alive at 1 year after registration. (NCT01078441)
Timeframe: Assessed at 1 year

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Treatment (Combination Chemotherapy)0.5

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Hematologic Overall Response (Partial Response [PR]+ Very Good PR [VGPR]+ Amyloid Complete Response [ACR]+ Stringent Complete Response [sCR]) After 3 Months (3 Cycles) of Therapy

sCR: ACR and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM) ACR: Negative serum/urine immunofixation (IF), <5% plasma cells in BM, and normal serum FLC ratio VGPR: 1. PR and any of the following; 2. serum/urine M-protein detectable by IF but not measurable (NM) on electrophoresis (EP); (3) ≥90% reduction in serum M-component and urine M-protein <100 mg/24 hr if baseline serum measurable; (4) urine M-component <100 mg/24 hr and NM serum M-protein on serum protein EP if baseline urine measurable; (5) ≥90% drop in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels if only FLC measurable PR: (1) ≥50% drop of serum M-protein and 24-hr urinary M-protein drop by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hr if baseline serum/urine measurable; or (2) ≥50% drop of serum M-protein if only serum measurable at baseline; or (3) 24-hr urinary M-protein drop by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hr if baseline urine measurable; or (4) ≥ 50% drop in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC if only FLC measu (NCT01078454)
Timeframe: Assessed at 3 months

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (Mel-Dex)0.33
Arm B (B-Mel-Dex)0.60

[back to top]

Number of Participants Surviving at 5 Years

(NCT01083316)
Timeframe: 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone29

[back to top]

Number of Participants Proceeding to Transplant Following Induction

(NCT01083316)
Timeframe: 2 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone30

[back to top]

Number of Participants Surviving at 100 Days Post Transplant

(NCT01083316)
Timeframe: 100 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone27

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Disease Response

Complete response: Normal serum free light chain ratio and Negative serum and urine immunofixation electrophoresis Very good partial response: Difference in serum free light chains less than 40 mg/L Partial Response: >50% Reduction in the difference in serum free light chains (NCT01083316)
Timeframe: One year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone20

[back to top]

Over All Survival

Kaplan Meier estimates- median time to event (NCT01083602)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib & Dexamethasone559.0

[back to top]

Responders to Treatment

The primary endpoint for this phase II study of patients with bortezomib-refractory MM is response after a maximum of 8 cycles of therapy as defined by the modified EBMT criteria. (NCT01083602)
Timeframe: after eight cycyles of treatment (24 weeks)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Response (CR)near Complete Response(nCR)Partial Response (PR)Minimal Response (MR)No ChangePregressive Disease (PD)Unknown
Panobinostat + Bortezomib & Dexamethasone0118102033

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of first study treatment to first occurrence of documented progressive disease /relapse or death. Time from randomization until disease progression or death by Kaplan-Meier estimates (NCT01083602)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

Interventiondays (Median)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib & Dexamethasone164.0

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time from randomization until objective tumor progression; does not include deaths-- Kaplan-Meier estimates (NCT01083602)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionDays (Median)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib & Dexamethasone164.0

[back to top]

Time to Response (Greater Than or Equal to PR) Based on Investigator Assessment

Time to response is defined as the time from the date of first administration of study treatment to the date of first documented evidence of CR or nCR or PR (whichever status is recorded first). Patients who do not have a response of PR or better by the data cut-off date are censored. (NCT01083602)
Timeframe: after eight cycyles of treatment (24 weeks)

InterventionDays (Mean)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib & Dexamethasone51.8

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (PR+nCR+CR)

Overall response rate=(PR+nCR+CR) CR= < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. No confirmation on bone marrow plasma cell (additional assessment) is needed to document CR except patients with non-secretory myeloma where the bone marrow examination must be repeated after an interval of at least 6 weeks, Absence of M-protein in serum and urine by immunofixation,nCR same as CR without out Absence of M-protein in serum and urine by immunofixation,PR+ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and sofft tissue Plasmacytomas all for more than 6 weeks. (NCT01083602)
Timeframe: after eight cycyles of treatment (24 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Panobinostat + Bortezomib & Dexamethasone34.5

[back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response (TTR) was defined as the interval from the start of study drug to the first documentation of CR or PR. (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + Rituximab1.9
Idelalisib + Bendamustine1.9
Idelalisib + Everolimus1.9
Idelalisib + Bortezomib1.9
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Bendamustine1.9
Idelalisib + Ofatumumab1.9
Idelalisib + Fludarabine1.9
Idelalisib + Chlorambucil1.9
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Chlorambucil1.9
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Lenalidomide3.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the interval from the first documentation of CR or PR to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause. (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + RituximabNA
Idelalisib + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + Everolimus5.6
Idelalisib + Bortezomib9.3
Idelalisib + Rituximab + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + OfatumumabNA
Idelalisib + FludarabineNA
Idelalisib + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + LenalidomideNA

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Everolimus

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Weeks 0 and 4

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 4)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)
Everolimus (Cohort 5a)NA93.03.056.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Bendamustine

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 hours postdose at Week 0

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)0.25 hr post-dose (Week 0)0.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)0.75 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.25 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)2.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)3.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)4.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)5.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)6.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)
Bendamustine (Cohorts 1b, 2b, 3a, 3b, 3f, 3g, 4b, 5c)NA3484.14694.73433.22847.21916.41211.2514.0463.478.515.34.4

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 7)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Weeks 0, 5 and 13

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 5)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 5)Pre-dose (Week 13)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 13)
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohort 7)NA1603.120.71621.3354.8592.7

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 6)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 4)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)Pre-dose (Week 12)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 12)Pre-dose (Week 24)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 24)
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohort 6)0.01930.7530.81869.8677.91733.0346.81710.7

[back to top]

Toxicity of Administration of IDELA

Percentage of participants experiencing toxicities of administration of IDELA were measured according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.02 (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: First dose date up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Idelalisib + Rituximab100.0
Idelalisib + Bendamustine100.0
Idelalisib + Everolimus100.0
Idelalisib + Bortezomib83.33
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Bendamustine100.0
Idelalisib + Ofatumumab100.0
Idelalisib + Fludarabine100.0
Idelalisib + Chlorambucil100.0
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Chlorambucil100.0
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Lenalidomide100.0

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 1, Cohorts 2 and 3, Cohort 5)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours postdose at Week 0; predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Weeks 4, 12, and 24

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)0.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 0)2.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)3.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)4.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)6.0 hr post-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 4)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)Pre-dose (Week 12)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 12)Pre-dose (Week 24)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 24)
Idelalisib 100 mg (Cohort 1)0.4437.61022.41434.01282.71001.0788.4523.7416.51297.2361.91309.5369.91061.6
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohort 5)0.01380.01600.01564.71400.01170.0795.0517.0408.01877.9433.91426.8549.1885.6
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohorts 2 and 3)68.81231.41789.32017.31732.81296.1910.0486.0364.11808.1351.41883.0419.71840.1

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohort 4)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose at Week 0; predose, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours postdose at Week 4; predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Week 12; and predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Week 24

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 0)Pre-dose (Week 4)0.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)1.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 4)2.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)3.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)4.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)6.0 hr post-dose (Week 4)Pre-dose (Week 12)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 12)Pre-dose (Week 24)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 24)
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohort 4)0.00.01119.5994.51758.2737.0605.0547.0524.0401.92018.2752.52251.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the start of study drug to death from any cause. (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + RituximabNA
Idelalisib + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + EverolimusNA
Idelalisib + BortezomibNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + OfatumumabNA
Idelalisib + FludarabineNA
Idelalisib + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + LenalidomideNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).~The response definitions were based on the following standard criteria established for each indication:~CLL: International Workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (IWCLL),2008~iNHL & MCL: Cheson, 2007" (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Idelalisib + Rituximab78.4
Idelalisib + Bendamustine84.3
Idelalisib + Everolimus44.4
Idelalisib + Bortezomib61.1
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Bendamustine81.8
Idelalisib + Ofatumumab71.4
Idelalisib + Fludarabine91.7
Idelalisib + Chlorambucil66.7
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Chlorambucil93.3
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Lenalidomide71.4

[back to top]

Sub-study: Plasma Concentration of IDELA (Cohorts 1-4)

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: pre dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 6.0 hours post dose

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose0.5 hr post-dose1.0 hr post-dose1.5 hr post-dose2.0 hr post-dose3.0 hr post-dose4.0 hr post-dose6.0 hr post-dose
Idelalisib 100 mg (Cohort 1a, 1b)1.5437.61022.41264.71282.71001.0788.4523.7
Idelalisib 150 mg (Cohorts 2a, 2b, 3a, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f, 3g, 4a, 4b)0.01222.11723.11599.21646.21238.5879.8489.3

[back to top]

Plasma Concentration of Lenalidomide

(NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Predose, 1.5 hours postdose at Week 1 and predose at Week 5

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Pre-dose (Week 1)1.5 hr post-dose (Week 1)Pre-dose (Week 5)
Lenalidomide (Cohort 7a, 7b, 7c)NA51.6NA

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the interval from the start of study drug to the earlier of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause.~The response definitions were based on the following standard criteria established for each indication:~CLL: International Workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (IWCLL), 2008~iNHL & MCL: Cheson, 2007" (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Idelalisib + RituximabNA
Idelalisib + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + Everolimus4.3
Idelalisib + Bortezomib8.1
Idelalisib + Rituximab + BendamustineNA
Idelalisib + OfatumumabNA
Idelalisib + FludarabineNA
Idelalisib + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + ChlorambucilNA
Idelalisib + Rituximab + LenalidomideNA

[back to top]

Duration of Exposure to IDELA

Duration of exposure to IDELA was summarized using descriptive statistics. (NCT01088048)
Timeframe: First dose date up to 12 months

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Idelalisib + Rituximab8.1
Idelalisib + Bendamustine7.6
Idelalisib + Everolimus4.2
Idelalisib + Bortezomib5.1
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Bendamustine8.0
Idelalisib + Ofatumumab8.3
Idelalisib + Fludarabine8.9
Idelalisib + Chlorambucil8.8
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Chlorambucil8.7
Idelalisib + Rituximab + Lenalidomide7.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Dose Reductions in Bortezomib, Dexamethasone or Both

To evaluate the toxicity (safety and tolerability) of weekly bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for transplant or who are eligible but wish to postpone autologous stem cell transplant. (NCT01090921)
Timeframe: Data was collected for each subject for the duration of the participation in the study, which was an average of 4.8 cycles.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib reductionsDexamethasone reductionsBortezomib and Dexamethasone reductions
Bortezomib and Dexamethasone8144

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival will be measured from the beginning of treatment until there is evidence of progressive disease or death from any cause. Progression is evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.0). Target lesions are assessed by computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Progressive Disease (PD), 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01100242)
Timeframe: 36 weeks

Interventionweeks (Median)
VELCADE and Sorafenib13.71

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Tumor response is evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (version 1.0). Target lesions are assessed by computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI:) Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Overall response rate (ORR) is the percentage of patients who achieve a CR or PR (NCT01100242)
Timeframe: 42 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Complete response (CR)Partial response (PR)Overall response rate (CR + PR)
VELCADE and Sorafenib05.95.9

[back to top]

Toxicity Profile

Toxicity is assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Toxicity profile is reported as the number of patients who received at least one dose of on-study treatment and experienced a grade 3 or grade 4 adverse event (AE). For a more complete listing of all AEs experienced by patients on study, please see the Adverse Event section. (NCT01100242)
Timeframe: 42 days

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Abdominal painAnorexia (loss of appetite)DehydrationFatigueHand and foot syndromeHemoglobinHyperglycemiaHypertensionHypoalbuminemiaHypokalemiaHyponatremiaHypophosphatemiaLymphopeniaPain - Other (All over body)Pain in extremityDecreased plateletsWeight loss
VELCADE and Sorafenib22121211315441112

[back to top]

Proteinuria

Quantification of urinary protein will be made after treatment by measuring 24 hr urine protein. (NCT01103778)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

Interventiongrams per 24 hrs (Median)
Baseline1 year
Velcade® Therapy2.521.43

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Complete Remission, Partial Response, or no Response.

"Complete remission was defined as daily proteinuria of less than 300mg measured by 24 hr urine collection.~Partial response was defined as any reduction in daily proteinuria from baseline as measure by 24 hr urine collection." (NCT01103778)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete RemissionPartial ResponseNo Response
Velcade Arm313

[back to top] [back to top]

Serum Creatinine

Preservation of renal function will be assessed. (NCT01103778)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 year

Interventionmilligram per deciliter (Median)
Baseline1 year
Velcade Arm1.351.52

[back to top]

FACT-G Total Score

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) is a quality of life instrument that assesses the effects of cancer therapy on a patient's physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The assessment has 27 questions, each scored on a Likert scale from 0-4. The overall score is computed by adding scores of the questions and falls in the range 0-108, with higher scores indicating higher levels of overall well-being. (NCT01109004)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post-randomization

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 Year2 Years3 Years
Lenalidomide Maintenance77838585
RVD Consolidation79848484
Tandem Auto Transplant79848485

[back to top]

FACT-BMT Trial Outcome Index

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Trial Outcome Index is a quality of life instrument that assesses the impact of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) on a patient's physical and functional well-being while taking into consideration BMT-specific concerns. The assessment has 24 questions, each scored on a Likert scale from 0-4. The overall score is computed by adding scores of the questions and falls in the range 0-96, with higher scores indicating higher levels of overall well-being. (NCT01109004)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post-randomization

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 Year2 Years3 Years
Lenalidomide Maintenance63717373
RVD Consolidation65727371
Tandem Auto Transplant64707373

[back to top]

FACT-BMT Score

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant scale (FACT-BMT) is a quality of life instrument that assesses the effects of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) on a patient's physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being while taking into consideration BMT-specific concerns. The assessment has 37 questions, each scored on a Likert scale from 0-4. The overall score is computed by adding scores of the questions and falls in the range 0-148, with higher scores indicating higher levels of overall well-being. (NCT01109004)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post-randomization

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 Year2 Years3 Years
Lenalidomide Maintenance105113115115
RVD Consolidation107115115114
Tandem Auto Transplant107113114115

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as survival of death from any cause. To account for loss to follow-up of a few participants, the Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate overall survival at 38 months post-randomization. (NCT01109004)
Timeframe: 38 months post-randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tandem Auto Transplant81.8
RVD Consolidation85.4
Lenalidomide Maintenance83.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression

"Disease Progression is defined as progression of multiple myeloma, including one or more of the following:~A reappearance of serum monoclonal paraprotein, with a level of at least 0.5 g/dL~24-hour urine protein electrophoresis with at least 200 mg paraprotein/24 hours~Abnormal free light chain levels of >10 mg/dl, only in patients without measurable paraprotein in the serum and urine~At least 10% plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate or on trephine biopsy~Definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas~Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas~Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum Ca >11.5 mg/dL or >2.8 mmol/L) not attributable to any other cause~To account for loss to follow-up of a few participants, the cumulative incidence of TRM at 38 months post-randomization was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, treating death prior to disease progression as a competing risk." (NCT01109004)
Timeframe: 38 months post-randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tandem Auto Transplant39.8
RVD Consolidation41.0
Lenalidomide Maintenance45.6

[back to top]

MOS SF-36 Mental Component Summary

The Medical Outcome Study (MOS) SF-36 Mental Component Summary is a subscale of the SF-36 intended to measure mental well-being. It is scored on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of well-being. (NCT01109004)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post-randomization

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 Year2 Years3 Years
Lenalidomide Maintenance48505051
RVD Consolidation48515050
Tandem Auto Transplant49505051

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival is defined as survival without disease progression or initiation of non-protocol anti-myeloma therapy. To account for loss to follow-up of a few participants, the Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate progression-free survival at 38 months post-randomization. (NCT01109004)
Timeframe: 38 months post-randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tandem Auto Transplant58.5
RVD Consolidation57.8
Lenalidomide Maintenance53.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Treatment Response

"The number of participants with very good partial response (VGPR) or better [complete response (CR), near CR (nCR), and stringent CR (sCR)] according to the International Uniform Response Criteria will be calculated. The Worse than VGPR group includes PR, stable disease, and progressive disease.~sCR requires, in addition to CR: Normal free light chain ratio (FLC), Absence of clonal cells in bone marrow CR requires, in addition to nCR: Absence of the original monoclonal paraprotein (PPN), Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas nCR is defined as: < 5% plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate, No increase in lytic bone lesions VGPR requires: Serum or urine PPN not detectable on electrophoresis OR >=90% reduction in serum PPN plus urine PPN <100 mg/24hrs, >= 50% reduction in the level of serum monoclonal PPN or reduction in 24 hour urinary monoclonal PPN either >= 90% or to <200 mg/24 hours in light chain disease, >= 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas" (NCT01109004)
Timeframe: 1 and 2 years post-randomization

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
1 Year725726851 Year725726861 Year725726872 Years725726852 Years725726872 Years72572686
Worse than VGPRCR or sCRVGPR or nCR
Tandem Auto Transplant97
RVD Consolidation122
Lenalidomide Maintenance98
Tandem Auto Transplant56
RVD Consolidation50
Lenalidomide Maintenance60
Tandem Auto Transplant39
Lenalidomide Maintenance50
Tandem Auto Transplant98
RVD Consolidation117
Lenalidomide Maintenance93
RVD Consolidation37
Lenalidomide Maintenance41
Tandem Auto Transplant20
RVD Consolidation21
Lenalidomide Maintenance26

[back to top]

MOS SF-36 Physical Component Summary

The Medical Outcome Study (MOS) SF-36 Physical Component Summary is a subscale of the SF-36 intended to measure physical well-being. It is scored on a scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of well-being. (NCT01109004)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post-randomization

,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 Year2 Years3 Years
Lenalidomide Maintenance38424343
RVD Consolidation39434442
Tandem Auto Transplant37434442

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) of the Combination of Ofatumumab and Bortezomib in Patients Receiving Study Treatment

"Response was assessed based on Bone marrow biopsy and CT scan. Best responses are used for Response Rate and CR and PR only.~Complete Response - CR:~• Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy.~Partial Response - PR:~• At least a 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters (SPD) of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses.~Stable Disease - SD:~• A patient is considered to have SD when he or she fails to attain the criteria needed for a CR or PR, but does not fulfill those for progressive disease~Relapsed Disease:~• Lymph nodes should be considered abnormal if the long axis is more than 1.5 cm regardless of the short axis." (NCT01119794)
Timeframe: Bone Marrow Biopsy: Every 2 months for 1 year then every 4 months until progression for approximately 1 year/Via CT scan: every 4 months until progression, for a total of approximately 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRPRSDProgression
Ofatumumab IV,2132

[back to top]

PTEN Mutation Rate [Phase II]

The PTEN mutation rate is the percentage of patients with PTEN mutation identified in pre-therapy and post-therapy bone marrow samples per established methods. (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Samples were collected pre-therapy before the beginning therapy (baseline) and post-therapy after finishing the 6th treatment cycle (168 days).

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
MYD88/L265P mutationCXCR4/C1013G mutation
Phase II805

[back to top]

Phase II Duration of Response (DoR)

"The DoR is defined as the elapsed time from date when the measurement criteria are first met for a complete or partial response (whichever status is recorded first) until the date of first observation of objective disease progression. Analysis of DoR will be as follows:~For responding patients who die without objective PD (including death from study disease), DoR will be censored at the date of the last objective progression-free disease assessment.~For responding patients not known to have died as of the data cut-off date and who do not have objective PD, DoR will be censored at the date of the last objective progression-free disease assessment.~For responding patients who receive subsequent systemic anticancer therapy (after discontinuation from the study chemotherapy) prior to objectively determined disease progression, DoR will be censored at the date of the last objective progression-free disease assessment prior to post discontinuation therapy." (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Patients were assessed for disease every cycle while on treatment (168 days) and every three months while on maintenance therapy. In long-term follow-up, disease was monitored every 3 months. Study cohort median (range) follow-up was 15 (1 - 23) months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II14

[back to top]

Phase II Overall Response Rate

"Overall response rate is percentage of participants with complete (CR), very good partial (VGPR), partial (PR), or minimal response (MR) as best response during treatment.~CR:~No serum monoclonal IgM protein by immunofixation~Normal IgM level~Complete resolution of extramedullary disease, i.e., lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly if present at baseline~Morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy~VGPR:~Monoclonal IgM protein is detectable ≥90% reduction in IgM level from baseline~Complete resolution of extramedullary disease, i.e., lymphadenopathy/splenomegaly if present at baseline~No new signs/symptoms of active disease~PR:~Monoclonal IgM protein is detectable ≥50% but <90% reduction in IgM level from baseline~Reduction in extramedullary disease~No new signs/symptoms of active disease~MR:~Monoclonal IgM protein is detectable ≥25% but <50% reduction in IgM level from baseline~No new signs/symptoms of active disease" (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Up to 6 cycles (Day 168)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II87

[back to top]

Treatment-Emergent Sensory Neuropathy Rate [Phase I]

Percentage of participants experiencing Grade 1 - Grade 3 treatment-emergent peripheral (sensory) neuropathy events based on CTCAEv3 as reported on case report forms for phase I participants. (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Adverse events were assessed each cycle (ever 28 days) for 6 cycles then every 3 months on maintenance. Duration of therapy for the Phase I study up to 41 months.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase I Stage A Level 133
Phase I Stage A Level 233
Phase I Stage B Level 1100
Phase I Stage B Level 267
Phase I Dose Expansion50
Phase II48

[back to top]

Very-good-partial-response-or-better Rate [Phase II]

"Very-good-partial-response-or-better rate is the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) on to the combination of everolimus/bortezomib/rituximab. The combination regimen was received for up to 6 cycles.~CR:~Absence of serum monoclonal IgM protein by immunofixation~Normal serum IgM level~Complete resolution of extramedullary disease, i.e., lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly if present at baseline~Morphologically normal bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy~VGPR:~Monoclonal IgM protein is detectable ≥90% reduction in serum IgM level from baseline*~Complete resolution of extramedullary disease, i.e." (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Up to 6 cycles (Day 168)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II4.3

[back to top]

Everolimus Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) [Phase I]

"The following qualify as dose limiting toxicities:~Grade 3 or greater non-hematologic toxicity, considered by the investigator to be related to study drugs.~Grade 4 hematologic toxicity defined as: thrombocytopenia with platelets <10,000 µ/L on more than one occasion despite transfusion support; grade 4 neutropenia occurring for more than 7 days and/or resulting in neutropenic fever with elevated temperature (defined as > 101 degrees F). Lymphopenia, a recognized side effect of bortezomib, is not considered a DLT.~Inability to receive Day 1 dose for Cycle 2 due to toxicity" (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Assessed within the first cycle (28 days) of the study.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Phase I Stage A Level 10
Phase I Stage A Level 20
Phase I Stage B Level 10
Phase I Stage B Level 20

[back to top]

Everolimus Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Stage B [Phase I]

The MTD of Everolimus/Bortezomib/Rituximab combination is determined by the number of patients who have dose limiting toxicity (DLT). See DLT primary outcome measure for definition. MTD is defined as the highest dose where <1/3 participants experience a DLT. If no DLT's are observed on Level 1, 3 subjects will be enrolled in the Level 2. If >1/3 subjects in a cohort have DLT, that dose will not be considered safe, with no escalation (MTD exceeded). If 1/3 subjects experience DLT, the cohort will be expanded to 6 subjects. If <2 subjects with a DLT among the expanded cohort of 6 evaluable subjects a cohort of 3 subjects will be enrolled in the next higher dose level. If 2 or more subjects with a DLT among the expanded cohort of 6 subjects, that dose level will not be considered safe, no escalation (MTD exceeded).If no DLT's observed, then the MTD is not reached. The MTD was not reached with 0/3 participants experiencing a DLT in the highest level. Higher doses were not planned/tested. (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Assessed within the first cycle (28 days) of the study.

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase I Stage B Level 1 & 2 and Dose Expansion10

[back to top]

Everolimus Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Stage A [Phase I]

The MTD of Everolimus/Rituximab combination is determined by the number of patients who have dose limiting toxicity (DLT). See DLT primary outcome measure for definition. MTD is defined as the highest dose where <1/3 participants experience a DLT. If no DLT's are observed on Level 1, 3 subjects will be enrolled in the Level 2. If >1/3 subjects in a cohort have DLT, that dose will not be considered safe, with no escalation (MTD exceeded). If 1/3 subjects experience DLT, the cohort will be expanded to 6 subjects. If <2 subjects with a DLT among the expanded cohort of 6 evaluable subjects a cohort of 3 subjects will be enrolled in the next higher dose level. If 2 or more subjects with a DLT among the expanded cohort of 6 subjects, that dose level will not be considered safe, no escalation (MTD exceeded). If no DLT's are observed, then the MTD is not reached. The MTD was not reached with 0/3 participants experiencing a DLT in the highest dose level. Higher doses were not planned/tested. (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Assessed within the first cycle (28 days) of the study.

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase I Stage A Level 1 and 210

[back to top]

2 Year Progression-free-survival [Phase II]

2-year progression free survival (PFS) is the probability of participants alive and progression free at 2 years from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. PFS is defined as the time from enrollment to progressive disease (PD) or death. PD is defined as ≥25% increase in serum IgM level from lowest nadir and/or progression in clinical features attributable the disease. Patients alive without PD and not reporting use of non-protocol therapy prior to PD are censored at date of last objective progression-free disease assessment. Patients reporting use of non-protocol therapy prior to PD are censored at date of last objective progression-free disease assessment date prior to post-discontinuation therapy. (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Patients were assessed for disease every cycle while on treatment (168 days) and every three months while on maintenance therapy. In long-term follow-up, disease was monitored every 3 months. Study cohort median (range) follow-up was 15 (1 - 23) months.

Interventionpercent probability of PFS (Number)
Phase II28

[back to top]

2-year Time-to-progression Probability (TTP) [Phase II]

2-year TTP probability is based on Kaplan-Meier methods. TTP is defined as time from enrollment to the date of progressive disease (PD). PD is defined as ≥25% increase in serum IgM level from lowest nadir and/or progression in clinical features attributable the disease. Patients without PD and not reporting use of non-protocol therapy prior to PD are censored at date of last objective progression-free disease assessment. Patients reporting use of non-protocol therapy prior to PD are censored at date of last objective progression-free disease assessment date prior to post-discontinuation therapy. (NCT01125293)
Timeframe: Patients were assessed for disease every cycle while on treatment (168 days) and every three months while on maintenance therapy. In long-term follow-up, disease was monitored every 3 months. Study cohort median (range) follow-up was 15 (1 - 23) months.

Interventionpercent probability of progression (Number)
Phase II28

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months

(NCT01142401)
Timeframe: At 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Fulvestrant16
Arm B: Fulvestrant + Bortezomib22

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival at 24 Weeks (Arm C)

(NCT01142401)
Timeframe: At 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm C: Crossover From Arm A at Progression to Fulvestrant + Bortezomib5

[back to top]

Frequency of Most Common Toxicities

Most common toxicities in the fulvestrant arm alone (Arm A) and the fulvestrant/bortezomib combination arm (Arm B). Most common toxicities are defined as adverse events having occurred in >10% of the participants within either (or both) Arm A or Arm B. (NCT01142401)
Timeframe: Up to 7 years

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Hemoglobin-LowWhite Blood Cell-LowHyperglycemia/Glucose-HighHypoglycemia/Glucose-LowSGOT (AST-High)SGPT (ALT-High)Neutrophil Count Decreased/ANC-lowPlatelet Count Decreased/Platelets-LowHypocalcemia/Calcium-LowHyponatremia/Sodium-LowNauseaVomitingDiarrheaConstipationHeartburn/DyspepsiaAnorexiaHeadachePain (general)Peripheral Neuropathy (Motor, Pain, Sensory)Injection Site ReactionDyspneaCoughFatigueLimb EdemaInsomniaHot FlashesDizzinessArthralgiaMyalgiaAnxietyFeverPruritisRash/DesquamationDepressionAnemiaDry EyeHypertensionRash (General)Eye Disorders (not otherwise specified)Urinary Disorders (General)ThrombocytopeniaNeutropeniaUpper Respiratory Disorders (General)Musculoskeletal Pain Disorders (not otherwise specified)Mucositis Oral
Arm A: Fulvestrant4132445251410810829148341015125931243229561925377361081578832012771541812178
Arm B: Fulvestrant + Bortezomib614251123221123012126332474618232554491219235637353219281819121611164212212312116130231811

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Survived Until Study End (up to 7 Years)

Tabulation of the number of participants who survived from the date of first treatment until study end (up to 7 years). (NCT01142401)
Timeframe: From first treatment day until study end, assessed up to 7 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Fulvestrant Alone39
Arm B: Fulvestrant + Bortezomib42

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) of Adding Bortezomib to Fulvestrant in Arm C

This outcome measure determined if the addition of bortezomib to fulvestrant improved the clinical benefit rate (defined as objective response plus stable disease for at least 24 weeks from day+1). Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) is defined as the percentage of patients with advanced or metastatic cancer who have achieved complete response, partial response and stable disease to a therapeutic intervention in clinical trials of anticancer agents. (NCT01142401)
Timeframe: Up to 24 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm C: Crossover From Arm A at Progression to Fulvestrant + Bortezomib5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 12 Months

The number of patients, treated with fulvestrant alone and fulvestrant plus bortezomib, who remained progression-free (Arms A vs. B). Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT01142401)
Timeframe: At 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: Fulvestrant8
Arm B: Fulvestrant + Bortezomib16

[back to top]

Number of Patients Able to Collect >=6 x 106 CD34+ Cells/kg in <= 2 Collections.

The primary endpoint in all five treatment arms is the percentage of patients who are able to achieve greater than 6 x 106 CD34+ stems cells/kg harvested (defined as effectiveness). Note that no patients were enrolled Arm D and Arm E. (NCT01146834)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: VELCADE, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, & G-CSF11
Arm B: VELCADE & G-CSF0
Arm C: CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE & G-CSF14

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Achieved Neutrophil Recovery After Melphalan 200 Based Transplant

Number of patients who achieved neutrophil recovery after Melphalan 200 based transplant in 20 days or fewer. Neutrophil recovery is defined as an absolute neutrophil count of greater than 0.5 k/uL for three consecutive days. (NCT01146834)
Timeframe: 20 days post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: VELCADE, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, & G-CSF7
Arm B: VELCADE & G-CSF4
Arm C: CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE & G-CSF11
Arm D: PLERIXAFOR & G-CSF0
Arm E: PLERIXAFOR, VELCADE, & G-CSF0

[back to top]

Number of Patients Who Achieved Platelet Recovery After Melphalan 200 Based Transplant

Number of patients who achieved platelet recovery after Melphalan 200 based transplant in 20 days or fewer. Platelet recovery is defined as a platelet count of greater than 20,000, untransfused, for three consecutive days. (NCT01146834)
Timeframe: 20 days post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A: VELCADE, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, & G-CSF4
Arm B: VELCADE & G-CSF1
Arm C: CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE & G-CSF9
Arm D: PLERIXAFOR & G-CSF0
Arm E: PLERIXAFOR, VELCADE, & G-CSF0

[back to top]

Follow-up Time

time that patients were monitored for disease progression and overall survival (NCT01160484)
Timeframe: Follow-up visits for disease progression and overall survival every 3 months after study discontinuation. After progression, follow-up visits for survival status every 6 months or until alternate therapy needs to be started or death intervenes

Interventionmonths (Median)
DVD-R Single Arm11

[back to top]

Time to Best Response

(NCT01160484)
Timeframe: Up to 7.5 months (eight 28-day cycles)

Interventionmonths (Median)
DVD-R Single Arm2

[back to top]

International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria

The investigator will evaluate each patient for response to therapy according to criteria augmented from those developed by Bladé et al., 1998 presented below (Table 7-1). Assessment of disease response will be performed prior to drug administration on Day 1 of Cycles 2 8 and at the End of Study Treatment visit. If a patient is determined to have complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), or minor response (MR), then assessment of disease response is to be performed 4 weeks later to confirm the response. (NCT01160484)
Timeframe: Up to 7.5 months (eight 28-day cycles)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
CRVGPRPRObjective Response (CR+VGPR+PR)MRClinical Benefit (CR+VGPR+PR+MR)Estable diseaseProgressive disease
DVD-R Single Arm84719143342

[back to top]

Time to Progression

(NCT01160484)
Timeframe: Time from the start of treatment to progressive disease

Interventionmonths (Median)
DVD-R Single Arm9

[back to top]

Duration of Response

(NCT01160484)
Timeframe: First evidence of PR or better (for overall response) and MR or better (for clinical benefit response) to start of disease progression or death.

Interventionmonths (Median)
DVD-R Single Arm12

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

(NCT01160484)
Timeframe: Time from the start of treatment to progressive disease or until death

Interventionmonths (Median)
DVD-R Single Arm9

[back to top]

Time to First Response

(NCT01160484)
Timeframe: Up to 7.5 months (eight 28-day cycles)

Interventionmonths (Median)
DVD-R Single Arm1

[back to top]

Exercise Tolerance- 6 Minute Walk

Patients will have an exercise tolerance assessment defined as a 6 minute walk completed at cycle 1 (week 1) and cycle 2 (week 5) of treatment and visit 9 (12 weeks) and visit 10 (18 weeks). (NCT01163786)
Timeframe: Up to 18 weeks from baseline

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Cycle 1 (Visit 1): Started 6 Minute walkCycle 1 (Visit 1): Stopped before 6 minutesCycle 1(Visit 1):Declined walkCycle 2 (Visit 5) : Started 6 Minute walkCycle 2 (Visit 5) : Stopped before 6 minutesCycle 2(Visit 5):Declined walkFollow up/Visit 9: Started 6 Minute walkFollow up/Visit 9 : Stopped before 6 minutesFollow up/Visit 9: Declined walkFollow up/Visit 10 : Started 6 Minute walkFollow up/Visit 10 : Stopped before 6 minutesFollow up/Visit 10: Declined walk
Bortezomib1330300611511

[back to top]

Change in Pulmonary Function as Measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Decline

FEV1 will be measured by spirometry assessments at baseline (pre-transplant baseline - prior to pulmonary chronic graft-versus-host disease (p-CGVHD)) during treatment (10 weeks) and at follow up visit 9 (at 12 weeks) and at follow up visit 10 (at 18 weeks) with patients having spirometry tested up to 6 times from screening to the end of the study. FEV1 is reported as slopes computed by dividing difference in FEV1 by time in months. (NCT01163786)
Timeframe: Mean time to diagnosis (from transplant to p-CGVHD ) of 3.36 years (+/- 1.88 years) and up to 18 weeks after baseline

Interventionpercentage per month (Median)
Prior to diagnosis of p-CGVHDDuring Treatment with Bortezomib
Bortezomib-1.06-0.25

[back to top]

Short Form (SF)-36 Health Survey

"This is a quality of life questionnaire which yields scores for 8 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health). This questionnaire will be completed by patients on Visit 1 (week 1), Visit 5 (week 5), Visit 8 (week 8), Visit 9 (12 weeks), and Visit 10 (18 weeks).~Questionnaires were scored per the scoring rules for the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (version 1.0) A high score defines a more favorable health state. In addition, each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. Items that are left blank (missing data) are not taken into account when calculating the scale scores. Hence, scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered." (NCT01163786)
Timeframe: up to 18 weeks

InterventionAverage Score (Number)
Pt #01 Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #01 Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #01 Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #01 Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #01 Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #01 Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #01 Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #01 Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #01 Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #01 Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #01 Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #01 Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #01 Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #01 Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #01 Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #01 Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #01 Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #01 Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #01 Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #01 Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #01 Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #01 Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #01 Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #01 Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #01 Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #01 Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #01 Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #01 Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #01 Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #01 Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #01 Pain : Visit 1Pt #01 Pain : Visit 5Pt #01 Pain : Visit 8Pt #01 Pain : Visit 9Pt #01 Pain : Visit 10Pt #01 General Health : Visit 1Pt #01 General Health : Visit 5Pt #01 General Health : Visit 8Pt #01 General Health : Visit 9Pt #01 General Health : Visit 10Pt #2 Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #2 Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #2 Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #2 Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #2 Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #2 Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #2 Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #2 Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #2 Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #2 Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #2 Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #2 Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #2 Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #2 Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #2 Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #2 Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #2 Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #2 Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #2 Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #2 Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #2 Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #2 Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #2 Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #2 Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #2 Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #2 Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #2 Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #2 Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #2 Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #2 Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #2 Pain : Visit 1Pt #2 Pain : Visit 5Pt #2 Pain : Visit 8Pt #2 Pain : Visit 9Pt #2 Pain : Visit 10Pt #2 General Health : Visit 1Pt #2 General Health : Visit 5Pt #2 General Health : Visit 8Pt #2 General Health : Visit 9Pt #2 General Health : Visit 10Pt #3 Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #3 Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #3 Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #3 Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #3 Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #3: Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #3: Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #3: Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #3: Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #3: Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #3: Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #3: Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #3: Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #3: Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #3: Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #3: Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #3: Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #3: Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #3: Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #3: Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #3: Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #3: Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #3: Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #3: Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #3: Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #3 : Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #3 : Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #3 : Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #3 : Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #3 : Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #3 Pain : Visit 1Pt #3 Pain : Visit 5Pt #3 Pain : Visit 8Pt #3 Pain : Visit 9Pt #3 Pain : Visit 10Pt #3 : General Health : Visit 1Pt #3 : General Health : Visit 5Pt #3 : General Health : Visit 8Pt #3 : General Health : Visit 9Pt #3 : General Health : Visit 10Pt #4 : Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #4 : Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #4 : Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #4 : Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #4 : Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #4 : Role-physcial : Visit 1Pt #4 : Role-physcial : Visit 5Pt #4 : Role-physcial : Visit 8Pt #4 : Role-physcial : Visit 9Pt #4 : Role-physcial : Visit 10Pt #4 : Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #4 : Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #4 : Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #4 : Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #4 : Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #4 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #4 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #4 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #4 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #4 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #4 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #4 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #4 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #4 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #4 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #4 : Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #4 : Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #4 : Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #4 : Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #4 : Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #4 : Pain : Visit 1Pt #4 : Pain : Visit 5Pt #4 : Pain : Visit 8Pt #4 : Pain : Visit 9Pt #4 : Pain : Visit 10Pt #4 : General Health : Visit 1Pt #4 : General Health : Visit 5Pt #4 : General Health : Visit 8Pt #4 : General Health : Visit 9Pt #4 : General Health : Visit 10Pt #5: Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #5: Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #5: Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #5: Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #5: Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #5: Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #5: Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #5: Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #5: Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #5: Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #5: Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #5: Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #5: Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #5: Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #5: Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #5: Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #5: Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #5: Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #5: Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #5: Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #5: Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #5: Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #5: Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #5: Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #5: Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #5: Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #5: Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #5: Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #5: Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #5: Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #5: Pain : Visit 1Pt #5: Pain : Visit 5Pt #5: Pain : Visit 8Pt #5: Pain : Visit 9Pt #5: Pain : Visit 10Pt #5: General Health : Visit 1Pt #5: General Health : Visit 5Pt #5: General Health : Visit 8Pt #5: General Health : Visit 9Pt #5: General Health : Visit 10Pt #6: Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #6: Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #6: Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #6: Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #6: Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #6: Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #6: Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #6: Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #6: Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #6: Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #6: Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #6: Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #6: Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #6: Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #6: Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #6: Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #6: Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #6: Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #6: Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #6: Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #6: Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #6: Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #6: Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #6: Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #6: Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #6: Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #6: Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #6: Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #6: Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #6: Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #6: Pain : Visit 1Pt #6: Pain : Visit 5Pt #6: Pain : Visit 8Pt #6: Pain : Visit 9Pt #6: Pain : Visit 10Pt #6: General Health : Visit 1Pt #6: General Health : Visit 5Pt #6: General Health : Visit 8Pt #6: General Health : Visit 9Pt #6: General Health : Visit 10Pt #7: Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #7: Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #7: Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #7: Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #7: Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #7: Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #7: Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #7: Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #7: Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #7: Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #7: Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #7: Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #7: Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #7: Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #7: Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #7: Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #7: Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #7: Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #7: Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #7: Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #7: Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #7: Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #7: Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #7: Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #7: Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #7: Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #7: Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #7: Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #7: Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #7: Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #7: Pain : Visit 1Pt #7: Pain : Visit 5Pt #7: Pain : Visit 8Pt #7: Pain : Visit 9Pt #7: Pain : Visit 10Pt #7: General Health : Visit 1Pt #7: General Health : Visit 5Pt #7: General Health : Visit 8Pt #7: General Health : Visit 9Pt #7: General Health : Visit 10Pt #8: Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #8: Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #8: Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #8: Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #8: Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #8 Role-physcial : Visit 1Pt #8 Role-physcial : Visit 5Pt #8 Role-physcial : Visit 8Pt #8 Role-physcial : Visit 9Pt #8 Role-physcial : Visit 10Pt #8: Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #8: Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #8: Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #8: Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #8: Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #8: Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #8: Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #8: Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #8: Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #8: Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #8 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #8 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #8 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #8 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #8 : Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #8: Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #8: Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #8: Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #8: Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #8: Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #8 Pain : Visit 1Pt #8 Pain : Visit 5Pt #8 Pain : Visit 8Pt #8 Pain : Visit 9Pt #8 Pain : Visit 10Pt #8: General Health : Visit 1Pt #8: General Health : Visit 5Pt #8: General Health : Visit 8Pt #8: General Health : Visit 9Pt #8: General Health : Visit 10Pt #9: Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #9: Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #9: Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #9: Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #9: Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #9: Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #9: Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #9: Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #9: Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #9: Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #9: Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #9: Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #9: Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #9: Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #9: Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #9: Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #9: Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #9: Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #9: Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #9: Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #9: Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #9: Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #9: Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #9: Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #9: Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #9: Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #9: Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #9: Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #9: Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #9: Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #9: Pain : Visit 1Pt #9: Pain : Visit 5Pt #9: Pain : Visit 8Pt #9: Pain : Visit 9Pt #9: Pain : Visit 10Pt #9: General Health : Visit 1Pt #9: General Health : Visit 5Pt #9: General Health : Visit 8Pt #9: General Health : Visit 9Pt #9: General Health : Visit 10Pt #10: Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #10: Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #10: Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #10: Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #10: Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #10: Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #10: Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #10: Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #10: Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #10: Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #10: Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #10: Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #10: Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #10: Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #10: Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #10: Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #10: Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #10: Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #10: Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #10: Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #10: Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #10: Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #10: Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #10: Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #10: Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #10 : Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #10 : Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #10 : Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #10 : Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #10 : Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #10 Pain : Visit 1Pt #10 Pain : Visit 5Pt #10 Pain : Visit 8Pt #10 Pain : Visit 9Pt #10 Pain : Visit 10Pt #10 Visit 1 : General Health : Visit 1Pt #10 Visit 1 : General Health : Visit 5Pt #10 Visit 1 : General Health : Visit 8Pt #10 Visit 1 : General Health : Visit 9Pt #10 Visit 1 : General Health : Visit 10Pt #11 Visit 1 : Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #11 Visit 1 : Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #11 Visit 1 : Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #11 Visit 1 : Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #11 Visit 1 : Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #11 Visit 1 : Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #11 Visit 1 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #11 Visit 1 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #11 Visit 1 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #11 Visit 1 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #11 Visit 1 : Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #11 Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #11 Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #11 Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #11 Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #11 Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #11 Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #11 Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #11 Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #11 Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #11 Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #11 Visit 1 : Pain : Visit 1Pt #11 Visit 1 : Pain : Visit 5Pt #11 Visit 1 : Pain : Visit 8Pt #11 Visit 1 : Pain : Visit 9Pt #11 Visit 1 : Pain : Visit 10Pt #11 General Health : Visit 1Pt #11 General Health : Visit 5Pt #11 General Health : Visit 8Pt #11 General Health : Visit 9Pt #11 General Health : Visit 10Pt #12 Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #12 Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #12 Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #12 Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #12 Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #12 Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #12 Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #12 Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #12 Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #12 Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #12 Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #12 Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #12 Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #12 Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #12 Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #12 Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #12 Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #12 Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #12 Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #12 Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #12 Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #12 Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #12 Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #12 Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #12 Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #12 Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #12 Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #12 Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #12 Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #12 Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #12 Pain : Visit 1Pt #12 Pain : Visit 5Pt #12 Pain : Visit 8Pt #12 Pain : Visit 9Pt #12 Pain : Visit 10Pt #12 General Health : Visit 1Pt #12 General Health : Visit 5Pt #12 General Health : Visit 8Pt #12 General Health : Visit 9Pt #12 General Health : Visit 10Pt#13 Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt#13 Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt#13 Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt#13 Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt#13 Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #13 Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #13 Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #13 Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #13 Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #13 Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #13 Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #13 Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #13 Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #13 Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #13 Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #13 Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #13 Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #13 Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #13 Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #13 Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #13 Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #13 Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #13 Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #13 Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #13 Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #13 Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #13 Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #13 Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #13 Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #13 Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #13 Pain : Visit 1Pt #13 Pain : Visit 5Pt #13 Pain : Visit 8Pt #13 Pain : Visit 9Pt #13 Pain : Visit 10Pt #13 General Health : Visit 1Pt #13 General Health : Visit 5Pt #13 General Health : Visit 8Pt #13 General Health : Visit 9Pt #13 General Health : Visit 10Pt #14 Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #14 Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #14 Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #14 Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #14 Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #14 Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #14 Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #14 Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #14 Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #14 Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #14 Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #14 Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #14 Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #14 Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #14 Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #14 Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #14 Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #14 Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #14 Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #14 Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #14 Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #14 Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #14 Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #14 Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #14 Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #14 Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #14 Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #14 Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #14 Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #14 Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #14 Pain : Visit 1Pt #14 Pain : Visit 5Pt #14 Pain : Visit 8Pt #14 Pain : Visit 9Pt #14 Pain : Visit 10Pt #14 General Health : Visit 1Pt #14 General Health : Visit 5Pt #14 General Health : Visit 8Pt #14 General Health : Visit 9Pt #14 General Health : Visit 10Pt #15 Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #15 Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #15 Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #15 Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #15 Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #15 Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #15 Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #15 Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #15 Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #15 Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #15 Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #15 Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #15 Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #15 Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #15 Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #15 Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #15 Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #15 Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #15 Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #15 Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #15 Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #15 Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #15 Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #15 Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #15 Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #15 Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #15 Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #15 Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #15 Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #15 Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #15 Pain : Visit 1Pt #15 Pain : Visit 5Pt #15 Pain : Visit 8Pt #15 Pain : Visit 9Pt #15 Pain : Visit 10Pt #15 General Health : Visit 1Pt #15 General Health : Visit 5Pt #15 General Health : Visit 8Pt #15 General Health : Visit 9Pt #15 General Health : Visit 10Pt #16 Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #16 Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #16 Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #16 Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #16 Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #16 Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #16 Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #16 Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #16 Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #16 Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #16 Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #16 Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #16 Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #16 Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #16 Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #16 Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #16 Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #16 Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #16 Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #16 Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #16 Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #16 Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #16 Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #16 Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #16 Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #16 Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #16 Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #16 Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #16 Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #16 Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #16 Pain : Visit 1Pt #16 Pain : Visit 5Pt #16 Pain : Visit 8Pt #16 Pain : Visit 9Pt #16 Pain : Visit 10Pt #16 General Health : Visit 1Pt #16 General Health : Visit 5Pt #16 General Health : Visit 8Pt #16 General Health : Visit 9Pt #16 General Health : Visit 10Pt #17 Physical Functioning : Visit 1Pt #17 Physical Functioning : Visit 5Pt #17 Physical Functioning : Visit 8Pt #17 Physical Functioning : Visit 9Pt #17 Physical Functioning : Visit 10Pt #17 Role-physical : Visit 1Pt #17 Role-physical : Visit 5Pt #17 Role-physical : Visit 8Pt #17 Role-physical : Visit 9Pt #17 Role-physical : Visit 10Pt #17 Role-emotional : Visit 1Pt #17 Role-emotional : Visit 5Pt #17 Role-emotional : Visit 8Pt #17 Role-emotional : Visit 9Pt #17 Role-emotional : Visit 10Pt #17 Energy/fatigue : Visit 1Pt #17 Energy/fatigue : Visit 5Pt #17 Energy/fatigue : Visit 8Pt #17 Energy/fatigue : Visit 9Pt #17 Energy/fatigue : Visit 10Pt #17 Emotional Well-being : Visit 1Pt #17 Emotional Well-being : Visit 5Pt #17 Emotional Well-being : Visit 8Pt #17 Emotional Well-being : Visit 9Pt #17 Emotional Well-being : Visit 10Pt #17 Social Functioning : Visit 1Pt #17 Social Functioning : Visit 5Pt #17 Social Functioning : Visit 8Pt #17 Social Functioning : Visit 9Pt #17 Social Functioning : Visit 10Pt #17 Pain : Visit 1Pt #17 Pain : Visit 5Pt #17 Pain : Visit 8Pt #17 Pain : Visit 9Pt #17 Pain : Visit 10Pt #17 General Health : Visit 1Pt #17 General Health : Visit 5Pt #17 General Health : Visit 8Pt #17 General Health : Visit 9Pt #17 General Health : Visit 10
Bortezomib3055NANANA025NANANA10066.67NANANA5035NANANA8884NANANA87.575NANANA10055NANANA6555NANANA30NA3030750NA001000NA10010010025NA40205584NA88927687.5NA87.587.587.532.5NA45454525NA3531.253016.67NA30403025NA000NANA10010010020NA55588NA68687275NA62.587.57590NA10010090102031.252020456033.335050NA25100NA7533.330033.3333.33253535303560567266.67602537.550NA5022.52067.5NA55353530403010201510150000033.33033.3333.3333.33253020015727668646812.55037.512.512.522.53522.532.510252015202522.2227.7820150NANA000NANA010033.310101510046.6760646436NANA2537.525NANA1001005520202015152055NANANA10025NANANA100100NANANA6510NANANA7288NANANA5087.5NANANA77.577.5NANANA3035NANANA4575457045033.3366.67100100050504550405050455052605292925050507587.54545458090455055806575NA7070800NA025100100NA10010010070NA60707584NA80928075NA62.587.57577.5NA4577.567.570NA31.254056.25809083.338585025100251001001001001001006075806580888484929287.587.587.57587.510077.577.577.5100806565656515NA1051025NA250250NA100066.6730NA40202060NA84606850NA87.537.562.50NA22.51022.55NA1510153550NA4044.4400NA75033.33100NA1001004060NA65706880NA72805087.5NA87.587.577.555NA67.577.56045NA505520NA15101525NA00033.33NA010010040NA25251060NA60647262.5NA62.562.562.567.5NA1032.54520NA10151580NA455060100NA00500NA033.3310060NA50357556NA645292100NA62.562.562.5100NA32.54532.550NA50406010NANA511.110NANA02566.67NANA66.671000NANA0088NANA888037.5NANA5050NANANA7022.515NANA151030NANANANA25NANANANA0NANANANA20NANANANA48NANANANA0NANANANA22.5NANANANA25NANANANA95NA88.8985NA50NA10075NA66.67NA100100NA70NA4035NA96NA7676NA87.5NA5050NA100NA10075NA55NA7055NA

[back to top]

Phase I: MTD of Bendamustine When Combined With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.

In the first phase, MTD of bendamustine was determined in combination with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin to gain a better idea of safe dosing before proceeding with the second phase to assess efficacy. Assuming myelosuppression being a dose-limiting effect that could have been overcome with growth factor support, MTD of the combination with myeloid growth factor support was also tested. (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 7 months or until death

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase I Level 1:Bendamustine at 90 mg/m^2 With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.120
Phase I Level 2:Bendamustine at 120 mg/m^2 With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal120

[back to top]

Phase I & Phase II : Toxicity of Treatment Regimen

Toxicity profile (for all patients) were presented by rate of overall toxicity and rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicities analyzed separately and combined. (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 until death or up to a maximum of 54 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Number of patients had at least one adverse event of any gradeNumber of patients had at least one grade 3 or greater adverse eventNumber of patients had at least one grade 3 or greater treatment related adverse eventNumber of patients having serious adverse event
Phase I Level 1 : Bendamustine at 90mg/m^2 With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.3221
Phase I Level 2 : Bendamustine at 120mg/m^2 With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.3331
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.2419148

[back to top]

Phase II: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"The time from the start of treatment of MM patients treated with bendamustine, bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. to disease progression or death (regardless of cause of death), whichever comes first. Censoring date will be the last disease evaluation date.Per modified International Myeloma Working Group criteria: Progressive disease (PD) is reported if any one of the following criteria is met:~Increase of 25% or more in serum or urine M-protein from baseline;Serum M-protein and/or the absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL;Urine M-protein and/or absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24 hours ; Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas;Development of hyperc." (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 54 months until death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.18.96

[back to top]

Phase II: Overall Survival

The time from the start of treatment to death from any cause with last date known alive as censoring date. (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 54 months or until death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.30.13

[back to top]

Phase II: Duration of Survival

Duration of MM patients treated with bendamustine, bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. from first date of at least partial response to the time of progression or death due to disease progression as events, with disease progression and death due to disease progression as events and deaths due to causes other than progression as censored. Censoring date will be the last disease evaluation date or date of death due to other causes as appropriate. (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 52 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.13.80

[back to top]

Phase II : Time to Progression

"The time from the start of treatment (i.e., first dose) of MM patients treated with bendamustine, bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin to disease progression, with disease progression and death due to disease progression as events and deaths due to causes other than progression as censored. Censoring date will be the last disease evaluation date for patient without progression/death or date of death due to other diseases for patients' deaths due to other causes.Per modified International Myeloma Working Group criteria: Progressive disease (PD) is reported if any one of the following criteria is met:~Increase of 25% or more in serum or urine M-protein from baseline;Serum M-protein and/or the absolute increase must be ≥0.5 g/dL;Urine M-protein and/or absolute increase must be ≥200 mg/24 hours ; Development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas;Development of hyperc." (NCT01177683)
Timeframe: From C1D1 up to a maximum of 54 months or until death

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase II : Bendamustine in Combination With Bortezomib and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin.20.53

[back to top]

Toxicity

To evaluate the toxicity profile of this regimen. Adverse event counts by grade are presented. (NCT01186458)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionnumber of adverse events (Number)
Total Adverse EventsGrade 1 Adverse EventsGrade 2 Adverse EventsGrade 3 Adverse EventsGrade 4 Adverse EventsGrade 5 Adverse Events
Fludarabine, Velcade and Rituximab1227735910

[back to top]

Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)

QALYs were estimated with a model beginning at initiation of first-line therapy by arm. A lifetime horizon, as well as subsequent lines of therapy, was examined using open-source Amua 0.3.0 software. Base case analysis was performed using 10,000 first-order Monte Carlo simulations. Conditional probabilities were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves from pivotal clinical trials using WebPlotDigitizer. Costs were estimated from RED BOOK and DFCI charge reporting in US Dollars ($) after inflation adjustment to 2022 and 3% discounting, and QALYs effects were measured using EQ-5D data from Hatswell et al. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Maximum observation of survival for this study cohort was 129.4 months.

Interventionyears gained (Mean)
RVD Alone5.67
RVD Plus ASCT6.10

[back to top]

Subsequent Therapy Rate

Subsequent therapy rate was the percentage of participants who discontinued treatment and initiated subsequent non-protocol therapy. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Up to 129 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
RVD Alone222
RVD Plus ASCT192

[back to top]

Median Treatment Duration

Treatment duration estimated using the KM method is defined as the time from registration (C1) to the time off treatment (event) or censored at date of last treatment. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Up to 134 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
RVD Alone28.2
RVD Plus ASCT36.8

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and defined as time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression (PD) as determined by central review or death from any cause (events). Patients who started non-protocol therapy (NPT) were censored at the date of NPT initiation if available or date treatment ended if date of NPT was missing. Deaths occurring beyond 1 year from the date last known progression-free are not counted as events and censored at date of last disease evaluation. Patients who had not started NPT, progressed, or died were censored at the date of last disease evaluation. PD was based upon the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria. [Kumar S, et al Lancet Oncol 2016;17(8):e328-e346]. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: On treatment, disease was assessed every cycle up to maintenance and every 3 cycles on maintenance. In long-term follow-up, disease was assessed every 2 months until PD or death. Median (maximum) PFS follow-up was 70 and 129 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
RVD Alone46.2
RVD Plus ASCT67.5

[back to top]

Median Maintenance Treatment Duration

Maintenance treatment duration estimated using the KM method is defined as the time from start of maintenance to the time off maintenance (event) or censored at date of last maintenance treatment. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Up to 128 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
RVD Alone36.4
RVD Plus ASCT41.5

[back to top]

Median Event Free Survival (EFS)

EFS was estimated using the KM method and defined as the time from randomization to the earliest of IMWG disease progression, death, or initiation of non-protocol therapy (events); patients were censored date of last disease evaluation. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Assessed up to approximately 130 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
RVD Alone32.0
RVD Plus ASCT47.3

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30): Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QoL) Sub-scale

The EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment consists of 30 questions that are used to construct 15 distinct sub-scales (five function scales, nine symptom scales, and a global health status/QoL scale). The global health status/QoL scale is comprised of two questions each with a range of 6 (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). Scores on all sub-scales range from 0 to 100 after linear transformation of the raw scores, with higher scores representing better global health status and quality of life. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (Baseline), Cycle 2, Pre-Mobilization, Cycle 5 Arm A / Post Auto-HSCT Arm B, Cycle 8 Arm A /Cycle 5 Arm B, Maintenance Day 1, 2 years from baseline, 3 years from baseline

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2Pre-MobilizationCycle 5 Arm A / Post Auto-HSCT Arm BCycle 8 Arm A /Cycle 5 Arm BMaintenance Day 12 years from baseline3 years from baseline
RVD Alone0.10.43.01.25.35.13.5
RVD Plus ASCT4.34.4-11.18.39.911.112.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX)

The FACT/GOG-NTX assessment consists of 11 questions that are all used to construct 1 subscale to summarize symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, including sensory, motor, and auditory problems and cold sensitivity. (https://www.facit.org/measures/FACT-GOG-NTX) Each question has 4 possible responses from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very Much) which are reverse-scored and summed. This sum is then scaled by the number of questions answered by multiplying by 11 and then dividing by the number of questions that are non-blank, in order to keep all final scores proportional to one another even if some questions are left blank. The aggregate score ranges from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating less neurotoxicity and lower scores indicating more neurotoxicity. Change from baseline is the difference (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (Baseline), Cycle 2, Pre-Mobilization, Cycle 5 Arm A / Post Auto-HSCT Arm B, Cycle 8 Arm A /Cycle 5 Arm B, Maintenance Day 1, 2 years from baseline, 3 years from baseline

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2Pre-MobilizationCycle 5 Arm A / Post Auto-HSCT Arm BCycle 8 Arm A /Cycle 5 Arm BMaintenance Day 12 years from baseline3 years from baseline
RVD Alone-1.8-3.9-4.4-4.7-3.7-4.9-4.6
RVD Plus ASCT-1.3-3.5-4.4-2.5-2.3-2.6-3.2

[back to top]

Partial Response (PR) Rate

The PR rate is the percentage of participants achieving PR or better on treatment and was evaluated based on the IMWG criteria. PR was defined as > 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by > 90% or to < 200mg per 24 hours. If the serum and urine M-protein are unmeasurable, a > 50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria. If serum and urine M-protein are unmeasurable, and serum free light assay is also unmeasurable, >50% reduction in plasma cells is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was > 30%. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a > 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was also required. Exact (Clopper-Pearson) confidence limits of 98.2857% represents Bonferroni adjustment for 7 tests (1-0.05/7) per statistical analysis plan for key secondary outcomes. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Disease was assessed every cycle up to maintenance and every 3 cycles on maintenance. Median treatment duration (months) from randomization 28.2 (RVD Alone) and 36.1 (RVD plus ASCT). Maximum treatment duration was 133.5 months in this study cohort.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
RVD Alone95
RVD Plus ASCT97.5

[back to top]

Median Duration of Response: Partial Response (DOR PR)

DOR PR was estimated using the KM method and defined as the time from documented best response as CR to documented disease progression per IMWG criteria. Patients who have not progressed or died were censored at the date last known progression-free. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: On treatment, disease was assessed every cycle up to maintenance and every 3 cycles on maintenance. In long-term follow-up, disease was assessed every 2 months until PD or death. Median (maximum) DOR PR follow-up was 62.9 and 122.9 months.

Interventionmonths (Median)
RVD Alone38.9
RVD Plus ASCT56.4

[back to top]

Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate

The VGPR rate is the percentage of participants achieving VGPR or better on treatment and was evaluated based on IMWG criteria. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg per 24 hours. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Disease was assessed every cycle up to maintenance and every 3 cycles on maintenance. Median treatment duration (months) from randomization 28.2 (RVD Alone) and 36.1 (RVD plus ASCT). Maximum treatment duration was 134 months in this study cohort.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
RVD Alone79.6
RVD Plus ASCT82.7

[back to top] [back to top]

Complete Response (CR) Rate

The CR rate is the percentage of participants achieving CR or better on treatment and was evaluated based on IMWG criteria. CR was defined as the negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. Confirmation with repeat bone marrow biopsy was not needed. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: Disease was assessed every cycle up to maintenance and every 3 cycles on maintenance. Median treatment duration (months) from randomization 28.2 (RVD Alone) and 36.1 (RVD plus ASCT). Maximum treatment duration was 134 months in this study cohort.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
RVD Alone42.0
RVD Plus ASCT46.8

[back to top]

5-Year Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was estimated using the KM method and defined as time from randomization to time of documented IMWG disease progression or censoring time (time of last disease evaluation for those alive, time to death among those who died). Patients initiating non-protocol therapy prior to progression or death were censored at the date of non-protocol therapy in the TTP analysis. The 5-year TTP endpoint is a probability. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: On treatment, disease was assessed every cycle up to maintenance and every 3 cycles on maintenance. In long-term follow-up, disease was assessed every 2 months until PD or death. Median TTP follow-up was 70 months. The probability estimate is at 5 years.

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
RVD Alone41.6
RVD Plus ASCT58.4

[back to top]

5-Year Overall Survival (OS)

OS was estimated using the KM method and defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause. Patients alive were censored at date last known alive. The 5-year OS endpoint is a probability. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: In long-term follow-up, survival follow-up every 2 months until death. Median (maximum) OS follow-up was 76 and 129 months.The probability estimate is at 5 years.

Interventionpercent probability (Number)
RVD Alone79.2
RVD Plus ASCT80.7

[back to top]

5-year Cumulative Incidence of Second Primary Malignancy (SPM)

Second primary malignancy (SPM) is defined as the development of another new, unrelated cancer, regardless of treatment for previous malignancy attribution. The cumulative incidence of SPMs was estimated with death as a competing risk. SPMs were collected using an SAE form or MEDWATCH 3500A form, with intensity determined by using the NCI CTCAE version 4 as a guideline. (NCT01208662)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
RVD Alone4.9
RVD Plus ASCT6.5

[back to top] [back to top]

Find Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Bortezomib in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Out to 2.5 Years, by Count of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicities.

MTD is defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least one-third of patients (at least 2 of a maximum of 6 new patients). (NCT01212952)
Timeframe: 2.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1 Dose Level 10
Phase 1 Dose Level 21

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Reported in Adverse Events section of the results (NCT01212952)
Timeframe: 2.5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Dose Level 13
Phase I - Dose Level 26
Phase II41

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

The progression-free survival (PFS) time is defined as the time from registration to progression or death due to any cause. The distribution of progression-free survival will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. PD: Increase of > 25% from lowest response value in any one or more of the following: Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 0.5 g/dL), Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be > 200 mg/24 h) (NCT01212952)
Timeframe: 2.5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I - Dose Level 113.9
Phase I - Dose Level 218.1
Phase II10.7

[back to top]

The Percent of Patients With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status Changing to Negative at Day 100 (Post-AHCT), Among Patients With MRD Positive at the End of Induction (EOI).

Patients were treated with induction therapy (VRD) followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT). MRD status of a patient with at least partial response was evaluated at the end of induction (EOI) and day 100 (post-AHCT). MRD of a patient is measured by seven-color flow cytometry. (NCT01215344)
Timeframe: 6-months post ASCT

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
VELCADE, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone (VRD)30

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival by MRD Status at Day 100.

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT01215344)
Timeframe: up to 7 years

Interventionyears (Median)
MRD Negative at Day 1002.64
MRD Status Positive at Day 100 (Post-AHCT)NA

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)48.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)48.4
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)47.2

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Baseline

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)83.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)84.7
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)86.0

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate

"Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.~This analysis was conducted among 250 evaluable patients with Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) data available. The proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between patients with CIRS <10 and patients with CIRS >=10. Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
CIRS <100.70
CIRS >=100.70

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate

"Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.~This analysis was conducted among 222 evaluable patients. The proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between patients with Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) of 3-5 and patients with FLIPI of 0-2/unknown.~The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
FLIPI 0-2/Unknown0.71
FLIPI 3-50.64

[back to top]

Complete Remission (CR) Rate

"Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.~This analysis was conducted among 222 evaluable patients for the primary analysis. The purpose of this analysis is to compare the complete remission rate of rituximab + bendamustine vs. bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine as induction therapy, therefore, the proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between Arm B (bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine) and Arms A and C combined (rituximab + bendamustine)." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A and Arm C (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab)0.62
Arm B (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib)0.75

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)0.87
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)0.86
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)0.83

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate

"Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.~The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
FLIPI 0-2/Unknown0.90
FLIPI 3-50.81

[back to top]

5-year Overall Survival Rate

"Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.~The 5-year overall survival rate is reported by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score (<10 vs. >=10). Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
CIRS <100.87
CIRS >=100.80

[back to top]

3-year Progression-free Survival Rate

"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. 3-year progression-free survival rate is the proportion of patients who were progression-free and alive at 3 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.~Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.~The 3-year progression-free survival rate is reported by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score (<10 vs. >=10). Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
CIRS <100.83
CIRS >=100.68

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment

"The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.~FACIT-Fatigue subscale score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACIT-Fatigue subscale score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)39.2
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)34.5
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)36.3

[back to top]

3-year Progression-free Survival Rate

"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. 3-year progression-free survival rate is the proportion of patients who were progression-free and alive at 3 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.~Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)0.77
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)0.82
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)0.76

[back to top]

1-year Post-induction Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate

"1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.~The purpose of this analysis is to compare the 1-year post-induction disease-free survival (DFS) rate with rituximab plus lenalidomide to rituximab alone as continuation therapy following induction treatment of bendamustine+rituximab, therefore, patients with induction treatment of bendamustine + rituximab + bortezomib were not included in this analysis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)0.85
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)0.67

[back to top]

1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate

"1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.~This analysis was conducted among 250 evaluable patients with Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) data available. The proportion of patients disease-free and alive at 1 year post induction treatment was compared between patients with CIRS <10 and patients with CIRS >=10. Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
CIRS <100.62
CIRS >=100.65

[back to top]

1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate

"1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.~This analysis was conducted among 203 evaluable patients in the continuation treatment portion of the study. The 1-year post induction disease-free survival rate was compared between patients with FLIPI of 3-5 and patients with FLIPI of 0-2/unknown.~The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
FLIPI 0-2/Unknown0.84
FLIPI 3-50.74

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Peripheral Neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy was assessed using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Proportion of patients with grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was compared between patients with subcutaneous bortezomib and patients with intravenous bortezomib. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and for 30 days after discontinuation of treatment, up to 15 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Subcutaneous Bortezomib0.06
Intravenous Bortezomib0.12

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.~The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry

Interventionyears (Median)
FLIPI 0-2/Unknown6.1
FLIPI 3-56.2

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)39.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)39.1
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)36.3

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Baseline

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)38.6
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)37.9
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)38.1

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at the End of Induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at end of induction treatment (cycle 6), approximately 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)39.8
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)36.1
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)39.0

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 3, approximately 3 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)40.0
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)38.6
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)39.1

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Baseline

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)39.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)38.7
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)38.8

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment

"The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.~FACT-Lym subscale score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACT-Lym subscale score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)47.9
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)46.8
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)46.5

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Baseline

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)43.8
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)44.3
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)44.9

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Mid-treatment

"The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.~FACT-G total score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACT-G total score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score." (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)85.5
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)84.2
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)85.2

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at End of Induction Treatment

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. (NCT01216683)
Timeframe: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Arm A Then Arm D (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation With Rituximab)86.0
Arm B Then Arm E (Induction With Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation With Rituximab)86.5
Arm C Then Arm F (Induction With Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation With Lenalidomide + Rituximab)84.9

[back to top]

Toxicity Assessment

Assessment of the toxicities resulting from administration of combinations of thalidomide, bortezomib and melphalan (NCT01242267)
Timeframe: Patients will be hospitalized or in the outpatient transplant facility until engraftment and resolution of serious adverse events, a median of 16 (range, 11-24) days

InterventionSerious Adverse Events (Number)
Phase I - Thalidomide Dose Level 600 mg1
Phase I - Thalidomide Dose Level 800 mg0
Phase I - Thalidomide Dose Level 1000 mg0
Phase 23

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of Thalidomide

Maximum tolerated dose of thalidomide used in conjunction with dose-intense melphalan, bortezomib and autologous (syngeneic) HSC support in the salvage therapy of patients who failed a prior treatment with dose-intense melphalan (NCT01242267)
Timeframe: Dose escalation will be based on the assessment of tolerability determined after the last patient of each cohort reaches day +21.

Interventionmg (Number)
Phase 11000
Phase 21000

[back to top]

Treatment Free Interval/PFS

The treatment-free interval after treatment with the combination of thalidomide, bortezomib and melphalan (NCT01242267)
Timeframe: PFS was defined as the time from ASCT to disease progression or death from any cause, an average of 9 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 1/Phase 29.3

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VgPR) Rate

The complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VgPR) rate in patients undergoing ASCT using thalidomide, bortezomib and melphalan (NCT01242267)
Timeframe: Assessments will be made from Day +28 after transplantation for 3 months and then at 3 month intervals until demonstration of disease progression and initiation of further therapy, an average of 9 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I - Thalidomide Dose Level 600 mg0
Phase I - Thalidomide Dose Level 800 mg3
Phase I - Thalidomide Dose Level 1000 mg1
Phase 213

[back to top]

Two-year Overall Survival

Assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. 95% confidence intervals will be calculated using Greenwood's formula. (NCT01267812)
Timeframe: Participants were followed up to 5 years after initial treatment and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to generate the two-year overall survival estimate presented.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Bortezomib and Rituximab)95

[back to top]

Grade 3 or 4 Toxicities of Bortezomib and Rituximab Treatment

Observed toxicities will be summarized in terms of type, severity (graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.0) and attribution. (NCT01267812)
Timeframe: Participants were followed up to 5 years after initial treatment.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
NeutropeniaLymphopeniaPneumoniaAnemiaLung infectionSkin infectionWound infectionHypertensionThrombocytopenia
Treatment (Bortezomib and Rituximab)1782221111

[back to top]

Two-year Disease-free Survival

Assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. 95% confidence intervals will be calculated using Greenwood's formula. (NCT01267812)
Timeframe: Participants were followed up to 5 years after initial treatment and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to generate the two-year disease-free survival estimate presented.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Bortezomib and Rituximab)90

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Velcade in combination with temsirolimus provides benefit to subjects with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma as assessed by overall response rate (ORR) to therapy. ORR is the sum of patients with a Complete Response and Partial Response to therapy. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete REsponse (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01281917)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Median)
Velcade Plus Temsirolimus31

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Length of time from enrollment until death. (NCT01281917)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Velcade Plus Temsirolimus14.1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Velcade in combination with temsirolimus provides benefit to subjects with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS). (NCT01281917)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Velcade Plus Temsirolimus4.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of Response is how long a response to therapy is held before a subject has progressive disease. (NCT01281917)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Velcade Plus Temsirolimus7

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

The complete response rate (CR) to therapy as defined by International Lymphoma Response Criteria. (NCT01281917)
Timeframe: Up to 60 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Velcade Plus Temsirolimus3

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival defined as time from first treatment of MMY, i.e. day of first dose of induction therapy for MMY to date of death (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Bortezomib49.90
Non-treated Control47.26

[back to top]

Tumor Response: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Stringent Complete Response (sCR) or Complete Response (CR) Based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria

Tumor response was assessed as VGPR based on IMWG response criteria if, a) serum/urine M protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or; b) greater than or equal to 90% reduction in serum M protein plus urine M protein level less than 100 milligram/24 hour. CR=normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of phenotypically aberrant plasma cells (PC) in bone marrow with a minimum of 3000 total PC analyzed by multiparametric flow cytometry; Complete response (CR) negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmocytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib82.6
Non-treated Control72.3

[back to top]

Tumor Response: Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease (SD) or Progressive Disease (PD) Based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria

Tumor response was assessed as SD based on IMWG response criteria as not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or progressive disease; PD as Increase of >=25% from lowest response level in any one or more of the following: serum M protein (absolute increase >=0.5 g/dl)c or urine M protein (absolute increase >=200 mg/24 h); or serum/urine M protein unmeasurable: difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels; absolute increase >10 mg/dL; or % bone marrow plasma cells: absolute value >=10% or definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmocytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmocytomas; or development of hypercalcemia attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib6.5
Non-treated Control19.1

[back to top]

Number of Patients With Skeletal Events

Number of patients with skeletal-related events (i.e. pathological fracture (vertebral, non-vertebral, combined), radiotherapy, spinal cord compression, orthopaedic surgery, hypercalcaemia) occurring over 24 months study period (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

Interventionpatients (Number)
Bortezomib0
Non-treated Control0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in the Femur at End of Treatment

Change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) will be assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans at baseline and the end of treatment EOT visit (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: at screening (i.e. between 14 and 1 days prior to start of treatment) and at end of treatment (EOT), i.e. 24 weeks after randomization or until start of alternative MMY therapy, if earlier

,
Interventiong/mm2 (Mean)
Femur neckFemur total
Bortezomib0.00530.0071
Non-treated Control0.00440.0138

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biochemical Bone Markers: Dickkopf Homolog 1 (DKK-1)

Bone markers Dickkopf homolog 1 (DKK-1) was measured on serum samples. (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

InterventionPicomole per liter (Mean)
Bortezomib-39.31
Non-treated Control-25.15

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in the Spine at End of Treatment (EOT)

Change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) will be assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans at baseline and the EOT visit (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: at screening (i.e. between 14 and 1 days prior to start of treatment) and at end of treatment (EOT), i.e. 24 weeks after randomization or until start of alternative MMY therapy, if earlier

Interventiong/mm2 (Mean)
Bortezomib0.0214
Non-treated Control0.0167

[back to top] [back to top]

Appearance of New Bone Lesions Compared to Baseline

Appearance of new bone lesions assessed by skeletal survey compared to baseline (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

Interventionsubjects (Number)
Bortezomib0
Non-treated Control0

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Assessed by Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)

Subjects were asked to rate their general state of health on a Visual analog scale (in millimeter [mm]) ranging from 0 (worst state of health) to 100 (best conceivable state of health) mm. (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

Interventionmillimeter (mm) (Mean)
Bortezomib-0.3
Non-treated Control2.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Spine T-score

T score is used to calculate bone mineral density (calcium and other types of minerals) in an area of the bone. T score is the number of standard deviations above or below the mean for a healthy 30 year old adult of the same sex and ethnicity as a participant. This score is calculated from participant's age, gender and race and skeletal site. T score has a mean of '50' and a standard deviation of '10'. T score lower than its mean indicate low bone mineral density. (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

InterventionT score (Mean)
Bortezomib1.2028
Non-treated Control1.1811

[back to top]

Karnofsky Performance Status

"The Karnofsky performance status is a way to quantify cancer patients' general well-being and activities of daily life and runs from 100 to 0, where 100 is perfect health and 0 is death." (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
ScreeningFollow-up
Bortezomib92.40.0
Non-treated Control91.70.4

[back to top]

Tumor Response: Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR) Based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria

Tumor response was assessed as PR based on IMWG response criteria as >=50% reduction of serum and reduction in 24-h urinary M protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 h; or serum/urine M protein unmeasurable:>=50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels; or serum/urine M protein and FLC assay unmeasurable: >=50% reduction in plasma cells provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was >=30%; or plus if present at baseline: >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmocytomas. (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib8.7
Non-treated Control8.5

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Biochemical Bone Markers:Carboxyterminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (ICTP), Osteocalcin, Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP)

Bone markers (carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), osteocalcin (Oc) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was measured on serum samples. (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

,
InterventionMicrogram per liter (Mean)
ICTP (n= 44, 42)Osteocalcin (44, 42)BAP (42, 40)
Bortezomib-4.1120.15-0.48
Non-treated Control-3.5114.59-2.11

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

The Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was assessed as median number of months from baseline until the first documented sign of disease progression (increase in disease; radiographic, clinical, or both) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. (NCT01286077)
Timeframe: Baseline up to end of study (approximately 4 years 7 months)

InterventionMonths (Mean)
Bortezomib39.56
Non-treated Control31.66

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS rates (percentages) at 1, 2, ,3 and 4 years are defined as the percentage of patients who are alive and progression-free at the respective time points. The p-values of the log-rank test will be calculated to compare PFS between the two arms. (NCT01286272)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years

,
Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
PFS at 1 yearPFS at 2 yearsPFS at 3 yearsPFS at 4 years
Arm A (Ofatumumab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride)93.880.365.957.3
Arm B (Ofatumumab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Bortezomib)84.875.667.164.7

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"A complete response was defined using International Harmonization Project Response Criteria as the complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment, the infiltrate must have cleared on repeat bone marrow biopsy.~The complete response (CR) rate was calculated in newly diagnosed untreated follicular lymphoma patients receiving 6 cycles of ofatumumab-bendamustine (ARM A) and 6 cycles of ofatumumab, bortezomib, and bendamustine (ARM B).~The complete response rate was calculated as the number of patients with a complete response divided by the number of patients eligible for evaluation." (NCT01286272)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until patient stops treatment for any reason, up to 484 days post-randomization

Interventionproportion of patients (Number)
Arm A (Ofatumumab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride).621
Arm B (Ofatumumab, Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Bortezomib).597

[back to top]

Number of Subjects Who Achieved Complete Remission of Their Disease

Complete Remission (CR): A CR requires that the following be recorded concurrently: an absolute neutrophil count (segs and bands) > 1000/μL, no circulating blasts, platelets > 100,000/μL; adequate bone marrow cellularity with trilineage hematopoiesis, and < 5% marrow leukemia blast cells. All previous extramedullary manifestations of disease must be absent. If patients continue on with treatment, there can be no evidence of recurrence of ALL for at least 4 weeks. (NCT01312818)
Timeframe: Day 30

Interventionparticipants (Number)
ALL Treated Patients0

[back to top] [back to top]

Therapeutic Efficacy

Number of participants with an objective response of Partial Response (PR) or better according to European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria within 180 days post Expanded Natural Killer Cell Infusion. The minimum criteria to meet the EBMT definition of PR or better included: >= 50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas (if assessed); AND >= 50% reduction in plasma cells in bone marrow biopsy (if biopsy was performed and if >= 30% plasma cells at baseline); AND >=50% reduction in serum M protein and reduction in urine M protein >= 90% or to 200 mg/24hr OR >= 50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved serum free light chain levels (if serum M protein < 1 g/dL, urine < 200 mg/24 hrs, and an involved serum free light chain level >= 10 mg/dL at baseline). (NCT01313897)
Timeframe: 180 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Velcade for Anti-MM Therapy1

[back to top]

The Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD Requiring Systemic Immune Suppression up to 1 Year After Stem Cell Infusion

(NCT01323920)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade/Tac/MTX53

[back to top]

The Non-relapse Mortality, Progression-free and Overall Survival up to 1 Year After Stem Cell Infusion

Progression free and overall survival by 1 year after stem cell infusion will be assessed using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Progression-free survival will be defined as the time from stem cell infusion to the time of disease progression or death from any cause. Overall survival will be defined as the time from stem cell infusion to the time to death from any cause. Patients will be censored at the time last documented alive. Cumulative incidence and Kaplan-Meier curves will be constructed as appropriate. Progression is defined per clinical presentation, not protocol specified, and vary per disease, e.g. blasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood for AML/MDS; lymphoma + on PET/CT re-staging etc. (NCT01323920)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercent of participants (Number)
non-relapse mortalityprogression-free survivaloverall survival
Velcade/Tac/MTX8.88584

[back to top]

The Percentage Donor Engraftment up to Day 30 Post Stem Cell Infusion

To assess the percentage donor engraftment up to day 30 post stem cell infusion, defined as the first of 3 consecutive days tested of documented absolute netrophil count (ANC) >/= 500 cells/u/L (NCT01323920)
Timeframe: Day 30

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade/Tac/MTX94

[back to top]

The Cumulative Incidence of Grade II-IV Acute GVHD up to Day 100 After Stem Cell Infusion

The primary outcome of this study is the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD up to Day 100 after stem cell infusion. Acute GHVD is graded according to the modified Glucksberg criteria (adapted from Thomas et al., NEJM ,1975, pp. 895-90), which is based on criteria by which the provider classifies acute GVHD per its objective organ staging. Acute GVHD is assessed in weekly standard of care visits post stem cell infusion and is captured in the protocol EDC upon evaluation of clinical notes up to Day 100. Data for acute GVHD organ staging and etiologies are collected in an acute GVHD separate case report form and do not include system organ class, expectedness or attribution. (NCT01323920)
Timeframe: Day 100

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade/Tac/MTX32

[back to top]

Proportion of High Risk Children Without HR FLT3/ITD+ Converting From Positive MRD at End of Induction I to Negative MRD at the End of Induction II

The proportion of high risk children without HR FLT3/ITD+ converting from positive MRD at end of Induction I to negative MRD at the end of Induction II will be estimated as well as the corresponding 95% confidence interval determined using a binomial exact method. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm A0.5000
Arm B0.5238

[back to top]

EFS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 3

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year EFS, defined as the time from study entry until induction failure, relapse, secondary malignancy, or death. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm C (Cohort 3)58.18

[back to top]

OS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 1

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year OS, defined as the time from study entry until death. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm C (Cohort 1)41.67

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for Patients Without High Allelic Ratio FLT3/ITD+ Mutations

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year EFS, defined as the time from study entry until induction failure, relapse, secondary malignancy, or death. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A45.64
Arm B46.95

[back to top]

OS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 3

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year OS, defined as the time from study entry until death. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm C (Cohort 3)61.84

[back to top]

Relapse Rate for Patients Without High Allelic Ratio FLT3/ITD+ Mutations

Cumulative incidence estimates 3 year relapse rate defined as time from study entry to induction failure or relapse where deaths or secondary malignancies are competing events. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A46.67
Arm B46.65

[back to top]

Change in Ejection Fraction

The mean percentage change in ejection fraction from baseline to the end of Induction I will be determined for eligible patients enrolled on Arms A, B and C. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Arm A-2.0272
Arm B-2.3453
Arm C (Cohort 1)-7.5000
Arm C (Cohort 2)-5.1997
Arm C (Cohort 3)-3.4624

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) for Patients Without High Allelic Ratio FLT3/ITD+ Mutations

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year OS, defined as the time from study entry until death. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm A65.04
Arm B68.45

[back to top]

OS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 2

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year OS, defined as the time from study entry until death. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm C (Cohort 2)64.77

[back to top]

Bortezomib Clearance

Median and range of bortezomib clearance during Induction II. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Day 8 of Induction II

InterventionLiters/hour/m^2 (Median)
Arm B8.42

[back to top]

Change in Shortening Fraction

Mean percentage change in shortening fraction from baseline to the end of Induction I will be determined for eligible patients enrolled on Arms A, B and C. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 4 weeks

InterventionPercentage change (Mean)
Arm A-1.8445
Arm B-2.6298
Arm C (Cohort 1)-2.2333
Arm C (Cohort 2)-3.6700
Arm C (Cohort 3)-3.4246

[back to top]

Sorafenib Steady State Concentration

Median and range of sorafenib steady state concentration for Induction I. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

InterventionNanogram/Milliliter (Median)
Arm C1090.0

[back to top]

Total Scale Score From Parent-reported Cancer Module

"Results represent the total scale scores from the parent report of the PedsQL™ 3.0 Cancer Module for timepoint 1 (up to 14 days from start of therapy). Items are reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. Therefore, a higher number is a better outcome. The total score is the sum of all the items divided by the number of items answered on all the scales. Scores on a scale is used for a unit of measure." (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 14 days

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Arm A66.2
Arm B65.8
Arm C (Cohort 1)74.9
Arm C (Cohort 2)63.7

[back to top]

Total Scale Score From Parent-reported Multidimensional Fatigue Scale Module

"Results represent the total scale scores from the parent report of the PedsQL™ Multidimensional Fatigue Scale for timepoint 1 (up to 14 days from start of therapy). Items are reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. Therefore, a higher number is a better outcome. The total score is the sum of all the items divided by the number of items answered on all the scales. Scores on a scale is used for a unit of measure." (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 14 days

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Arm A60.5
Arm B58.1
Arm C (Cohort 1)71.2
Arm C (Cohort 2)48.2

[back to top]

Total Scale Score From Parent-reported Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Module

"Results represent the total scale scores from the parent report of the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales for timepoint 1 (up to 14 days from start of therapy). Items are reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. Therefore, a higher number is a better outcome. The total score is the sum of all the items divided by the number of items answered on all the scales. Scores on a scale is used for a unit of measure." (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 14 days

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Arm A68.3
Arm B67.8
Arm C (Cohort 1)71.3
Arm C (Cohort 2)61.6

[back to top]

EFS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 1

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year EFS, defined as the time from study entry until induction failure, relapse, secondary malignancy, or death. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm C (Cohort 1)25.00

[back to top]

EFS for Patients on Arm C, Cohort 2

The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate 3-year EFS, defined as the time from study entry until induction failure, relapse, secondary malignancy, or death. (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Arm C (Cohort 2)56.12

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Experiencing Grade 3 or Higher Non-hematologic Toxicities and Infections While on Protocol Therapy

The proportion of patients experiencing at least one grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity and infection while on protocol therapy will be estimated along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval determined using a binomial exact method. Toxicity will be assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0). (NCT01371981)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

InterventionProportion of patients (Number)
Arm A0.8819
Arm B0.9217
Arm C (Cohort 1)0.9167
Arm C (Cohort 2)0.9394
Arm C (Cohort 3)0.9149
Arm D0.0239

[back to top]

Phase I: The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Temsirolimus in Combination With Bortezomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone

Temsirolimus in combination with bortezomib, rituximab, dexamethasone were to be escalated using a standard 3+3 design. The MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 0 in 3 or 1 in 6 participants experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 28-day cycle of treatment. (NCT01381692)
Timeframe: Assessed during cycle 1 (28 days)

Interventionmg (Number)
Arm A (Phase I: Temsirolimus Dose Level 1, Rituximab, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone)NA
Arm B (Phase I: Temsirolimus Dose Level 2, Rituximab, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone)NA

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival at 24 Months

following the 3-phase comprehensive treatment approach including induction with BD, followed by risk adapted HDM/ASCT, followed by consolidation/maintenance therapy with BD in patients with AL amyloidosis. (NCT01383759)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Amyloidosis68

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Progression Free Survival at 12 Months

of a 3-phase comprehensive treatment approach including induction with BD followed by risk adapted HDM/ASCT, followed by consolidation/maintenance therapy with BD in patients with AL amyloidosis. (NCT01383759)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Amyloidosis84

[back to top]

Participants Evaluated for Toxicity

Toxicities will be assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.0. (NCT01383759)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Amyloidosis19
Monoclonal Ig DepositionDisease (MIDD)1

[back to top]

Response Rate of Ofatumumab in Combination With Bortezomib in Patients With Relapsed CD20+ (Cluster of DIfferentiation Antigen 20) Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma, or Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Based on International Working Group (IWG) criteria, recorded in four categories: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR), regression of measurable disease and no new sites of disease; Progressive Disease (PD), Any new lesion or increase by >= 50% of previously involved sites from nadir. Stable Disease (SD), failure to attain CR/PR or PD. A response is defined to be either CR/PR. A failure in response includes SD/PD. (NCT01397591)
Timeframe: Every 2 cycles during treatment and then every 3 months for 2 years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Monoclonal Antibody and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Toxicity)

Toxicities and adverse experiences will be assessed at each visit using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 Interim analyses on toxicity will be implemented based on the toxicity endpoints of the first 6 patients, and will be conducted sequentially 4 weeks after the treatment of each patient, or when serious toxicity has been observed for the patient, whichever comes earlier. we assume a non-informative prior distribution (Beta (0.001, 0.001)) for toxicity rate, and compute the posterior distribution of toxicity rate sequentially. (NCT01397591)
Timeframe: Days 1, 8, and 15 of each course and 4-6 weeks after final treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Treatment (Monoclonal Antibody and Enzyme Inhibitor Therapy)2

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from study entry to progression or death. Progression free and surviving patients were censored at the date of last follow-up. The median DFS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Decitabine)7.3
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)8.0

[back to top]

Adverse Events

Adverse Events: Incidence of adverse events, assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Adverse events were collected every cycle during treatment and up to one month after treatment. Adverse events were summarized using summary statistics and frequency tables for each separate cohort. Per protocol, analysis was descriptive in nature. In this section, the number of patients that reported a grade 4 or higher event are summarized. A complete listing of Adverse Events is provided in the Adverse Events section below. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I (Decitabine)51
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)45

[back to top]

Complete Remission Rate (CR and CRi)

Defined as the number of patients who achieve a CR or CRi divided by the total number of evaluable patients. A Complete remission (CR) requires: <5% marrow blast, > 200 nucleated cells, no blasts with auer rods, no extramedullary disease, ANC >1,000/mm^3 and platelets > 100,000/mm^3. A CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) is defined as CR with exception of ANC < 1,000/mm^3 or platelets < 100,000/mm^3. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Decitabine)40
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)38

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS)

Disease free survival (DFS) was defined as the time from CR to relapse or death. Relapse free and surviving patients were censored at the date of last follow-up. The median DFS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Relapse is defined as the reappearance of blood blasts or >= 5% marrow blasts after achieving a CR or CRi. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Decitabine)8.5
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)15.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) Time

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from study entry to death of any cause. Surviving patients were censored at the date of last follow-up. The median OS with 95% CI was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. (NCT01420926)
Timeframe: 48 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Decitabine)9.3
Arm II (Decitabine and Bortezomib)8.8

[back to top]

Median Duration of Response of This Regimen

Duration of response is the time from response (CR or PR) until progression of disease or relapse. Responses and progression were evaluated based on the criteria published by the International Myeloma Working Group (Durie, et al, 2006). (NCT01438177)
Timeframe: up to 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Velcade+Cyclophosphamide+Chloroquine4.4

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Grade 3 or Higher

Adverse events reported here were at least possibly related to the protocol therapy. (NCT01438177)
Timeframe: Treatment period plus 30 days post-treatment

Interventionparticipants (Number)
FatigueHemoglobinNasal cavity/paranasal reactionsANC/AGCPain: pleuralPlatelets
Velcade+Cyclophosphamide+Chloroquine211415

[back to top]

Response Rate (CR + PR After 2 Cycles)

"Response rate is defined as the percentage of patients who have a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Responses were assessed every two cycles of treatment, based on the criteria published by the International Myeloma Working Group (Durie, et al, 2006). Per International Myeloma Working Group response criteria:~CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow PR: > 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >90% or to < 200 mg/24 h" (NCT01438177)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade+Cyclophosphamide+Chloroquine30

[back to top]

Overall Survival Rate

(NCT01453088)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Auto Transplant High Dose Melphalan27
Auto Transplant High Dose Melphalan+Bortezomib27

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival Rate

Progression free survival of elderly patients with multiple myeloma treated with either high-dose melphalan versus high-dose melphalan and bortezomib at 3 years (NCT01453088)
Timeframe: Participants will be followed post transplant for a minimum of 3 years, and after that may be monitored as part of the study indefinitely

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Auto Transplant High Dose Melphalan13
Auto Transplant High Dose Melphalan+Bortezomib11

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

The main primary endpoint of this study is two-year progression free survival. Patients are considered a failure with respect to PFS if they die or experience disease progression or relapse. The time to this event is the time from transplantation to relapse/progression, initiation of non-protocol anti-myeloma therapy, or death from any cause. Subjects alive without confirmed disease progression will be censored at the time of last disease evaluation. Deaths without progression are treated as failures no matter when they occur. (NCT01453101)
Timeframe: Subjects will be followed for progression-free survival for at least 36 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Fludarabine, Melphalan, Bortezomib16.7

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"Overall response rate: Defined as the composite endpoint of response to treatment which includes Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), stable disease (SD) as defined in International Response Criteria.~International Myeloma Working Group Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma:~CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow PR: > 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >90% or to < 200 mg/24 h SD: Not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or progressive disease" (NCT01453101)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fludarabine, Melphalan, Bortezomib45

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS): Defined as time from the first dose of administration to death from any cause (NCT01453101)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage (Number)
Fludarabine, Melphalan, Bortezomib42

[back to top]

Determine Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) of VELCADE When Administered in Combination With IFN-α-2b to Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma.

A standard method for the design of this study. Initially, three patients will be treated at a starting dose of VELCADE (1.0 mg/m2). If one of the three patients demonstrates a DLT, then an additional 3 patients will be treated at that dose level. If only one of the six show DLT, then the next cohort of three patients will be entered at the next dose level (1.3 mg/m2). If two or more of the six demonstrate DLT, no further patients will be treated at that dose level. The highest dose level at which less than 2 patients experienced DLT will be expanded to six patients. (NCT01462773)
Timeframe: up to 25 weeks or until disease progression

Interventiontoxicities (Number)
Grade 4 fatigueGrade 4 Lymphopenia
Bortezomib & Interferon-a31

[back to top]

Document Any Objective Anti-tumor Responses and Time to Tumor Progression That May Occur in Response to This Treatment Regimen.

"Measure levels of the cell cycle proteins p21 and p27 in PBMCs and tumor biopsies obtained pre-study and during week 4 of Cycle 1 (Day 26).~Conduct histologic evaluations of microvessel density, tumor apoptosis and lymphocytic infiltrates within tumor biopsies obtained pre- and post-study.~Measure plasma levels of bFGF and VEGF over the course of the study.~Monitor the effects of proteasome inhibition on the biological activity of IFN-α within immune cells by measuring Jak-STAT signal transduction in patient PBMCs." (NCT01462773)
Timeframe: up to 25 weeks

Interventionpatients (Number)
partial responsestable disease
Bortezomib & Interferon-a17

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Number of days from enrollment to recurrence of acute myeloid leukemia as determined by the reappearance of blasts in the blood or marrow (NCT01465386)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Treated Patients107

[back to top]

1 Year Progression-Free Survival Rate - Randomized Participants

PFS rate=Percentage probability of participants experiencing no progression or death up to 1 year, estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Response assessed by the investigator: Day 1 (± 7 days) of each cycle per modified IMWG criteria; assessed using ATA (ie, serum and urine M-protein tests performed within 14 days of each other; imaging done if baseline measurable extramedullary plasmacytoma existed). Progression: Any of the following: Increase of 25% from lowest response in 1 or more: serum and/or urine M-component; in those without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase > 100 mg/L) ; Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (≥10%). Definite new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing lesions or plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT01478048)
Timeframe: Year 1 after last participant was randomized

Interventionpercentage probability (Number)
Elotuzumab + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone0.39
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone0.33

[back to top]

Investigator-Assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR) - All Randomized Participants

ORR was calculated for participants with a best overall response (BOR) of partial response (PR) or better, including stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), and very good partial response (VGPR). BOR was determined by the investigator based on myeloma tumor assessments using IMWG criteria: CR=Negative immunofixation of serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; sCR= CR + normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow; VGPR=Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein level + urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hour; PR= ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hour. ORR= number of participants responding divided by total number of participants randomized, measured as a percentage. (NCT01478048)
Timeframe: Randomization until 111 events, up to May 2014, approximately 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Elotuzumab + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone64.9
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone62.7

[back to top]

Investigator-Assessed Objective Response Rate in Randomized Participants With at Least One FcγRIIIa V Allele

ORR was calculated for participants with a BOR of PR or better, sCR, CR, and VGPR. BOR was determined by the investigator based on myeloma tumor assessments using IMWG criteria: CR=Negative immunofixation of serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; sCR= CR + normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow; VGPR=Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein level + urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hour; PR= ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hour. ORR= number of participants responding divided by total number of participants randomized, measured as a percentage. Randomized participants with at least 1 FcγRIIIa V allele were a sub-set of all randomized participants. (NCT01478048)
Timeframe: Randomization until 111 events, up to May 2014, approximately 2 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Elotuzumab + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone60.0
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone61.1

[back to top]

Median Investigator-Assessed Progression-free Survival (PFS) Time (Months) From Randomization to Date of First Tumor Progression or Death Due to Any Cause - Randomized Participants

PE was planned for after at least 103 events; it was analyzed after 111 events. Response was assessed: Day 1 (± 7 days) of each cycle per modified International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria; assessed using adequate tumor assessment (ATA) (ie, serum and urine M-protein tests performed within 14 days of each other; imaging if baseline measurable extramedullary plasmacytoma existed). Progression: Any of following: Increase of 25% from lowest response in 1 or more: serum and/or urine M-component; in those without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 100 mg/L); Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (≥10%). Definite new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing lesions or plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT01478048)
Timeframe: Randomization until 111 events (disease progression or death), up to May 2014, approximately 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Elotuzumab + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone9.7
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone6.9

[back to top]

Number of Investigator-Assessed Progression-free Survival Events From Randomization to Date of First Tumor Progression or Death Due to Any Cause - All Randomized Participants

PE planned for after at least 103 events (progression/death); analyzed at 111 events. Those who neither progressed nor died were censored on the date of last adequate tumor assessment (ATA), which requires both serum and urine M-protein tests. If no post-baseline tumor assessments/no death, then censored on randomization day. Response assessed: Day 1 (± 7 days) each cycle; 30 and 60 days post treatment. Modified IMWG criteria used. Progression: Any of following: Increase of 25% in serum and/or urine M-component; if no measurable serum, urine M-protein levels, then difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 100 mg/L) ; Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (≥10%). New bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or increase in size of existing lesions, plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disorder. First dose occurs within 3 days of randomization. (NCT01478048)
Timeframe: Randomization until 111 events, up to May 2014, approximately 2 years

InterventionEvents (progression or death) (Number)
Elotuzumab + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone52
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone59

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival Time (Months) From Randomization to Date of First Tumor Progression or Death Due to Any Cause, in Randomized Participants With at Least One FcγRIIIa V Allele

PE was planned for after at least 103 events; it was analyzed after 111 events. Response was assessed: Day 1 (± 7 days) of each cycle per modified IMWG criteria; assessed using adequate tumor assessment (ATA) (ie, serum and urine M-protein tests performed within 14 days of each other; imaging if baseline measurable extramedullary plasmacytoma existed). Progression: Any of following: Increase of 25% from lowest response in 1 or more: serum and/or urine M-component; in those without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase > 100 mg/L); Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (≥10%). Definite new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing lesions or plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. Randomized participants with at least 1 FcγRIIIa V allele were a sub-set of all randomized participants. (NCT01478048)
Timeframe: Randomization until 111 events, up to May 2014, approximately 2 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Elotuzumab + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone9.9
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone8.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival

Progression-free survival will be defined as time from on-study to disease progression or death, whichever comes first (NCT01497275)
Timeframe: 6 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Zevalin + Velcade0

[back to top]

Response Rate (Complete Response + Partial Response)

"Disease will be assessed every 3 months.~The Cheson criteria will be used to define response:~Complete Response = Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of disease and disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.~Partial Response = A decrease of ≥ 50% in the sum of the products of their greatest transverse diameters (SPD) of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. These nodes or masses should be selected according to the following features: a) they should be clearly measurable in at least two perpendicular measurements; b) they should be from as disparate regions of the body as possible; and c) they should include mediastinal and retroperitoneal areas of disease whenever these sites are involved." (NCT01497275)
Timeframe: 3 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Zevalin + Velcade0

[back to top]

Overall Survival at 1 Year

Number of participants who were alive at the 1 year time point. (Overall survival will be defined as the time from on-study to death due to any cause.) (NCT01497275)
Timeframe: 1 year

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Zevalin + Velcade2

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose

The maximum tolerated dose of panitumumab (to be used in combination with bortezomib) (NCT01504477)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmg/kg (Number)
Combination of Panitumumab and Bortezomib6

[back to top]

Percent of Patients With Disease Control

Stable disease after 2 cycles, partial response or complete response as determined by RECIST v1.0 (NCT01504477)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Combination of Panitumumab and Bortezomib0

[back to top]

Percent of of Patients With a Complete or Partial Response

Partial response plus complete response as per RECIST v1.0 (NCT01504477)
Timeframe: 16 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Combination of Panitumumab and Bortezomib0

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose

The maximum tolerated dose of bortezomib (to be used in combination with panitumumab) (NCT01504477)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionmg/m2 (Number)
Combination of Panitumumab and Bortezomib1.6

[back to top]

Duration of Disease Control

Time from study registration until progressive disease (NCT01504477)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionDays (Median)
Combination of Panitumumab and Bortezomib35.5

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Siltuximab

Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) defined as follows: At first dose level, if greater than 1 out of 3 patients or greater than 1 out of 6 patients experience dose limiting toxicity (DLT), the dose level exceeds the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as toxicities graded in severity according to the guidelines outlined in the NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE) version 4.0. (NCT01531998)
Timeframe: 21 days

Interventionmg/kg (Number)
Siltuximab + Bortezomib + Lenalidomide8.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response

Overall response defined as number of participants with International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria: Complete Response (CR): Negative immunofixation serum & urine, Disappearance soft tissue plasmacytomas & =/<5% plasma cells in bone marrow; Stringent Complete Remission: CR + Normal Normal free light chain (FLC) ratio & Absence clonal cells in bone marrow by Immunohistochemistry/ immunofluorescence; Very Good Partial Response (VGPR): Serum & urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90%> reduction in serum M-protein +urine M-protein level <100mg per 24 hour; Partial Remission (PR): =/>50% reduction serum M-protein & reduction in 24-hour urinaryMprotein by >90% or to < 200mg per 24 hour, =/>50% reduction of serum M-protein & reduction in 24-hour urinary Mprotein by >90%/or <200mg, and if present at baseline, a >50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas; Stable Disease: Not CR, VGPR, PR Or Progressive disease (NCT01531998)
Timeframe: Evaluated after eight cycles of 21 days.

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Complete Remission (CR)Stringent Complete RemissionVery good partial remission (VGPR)Partial Remission (PR)Stable Disease
Siltuximab + Bortezomib + Lenalidomide20260

[back to top]

Phase II - Percentage of Patients With a Partial Response or Greater

Evaluate the overall response rate of patients receiving therapy. Patients are considered as having a response if their overall response is Partial Response or better. The percentage of patients achieving this and the exact 95% confidence interval will be calculated. Responses will be defined using the response criteria determined by the International Working Group for AML. (NCT01534260)
Timeframe: up to 9 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase II at MTD40.0

[back to top]

Phase II - Time to Relapse

Will be examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Time from date of confirmed complete remission to date of relapse. The observations of patients who died or remained alive and relapse free were censored at date of death or last disease evaluation, respectively. (NCT01534260)
Timeframe: Up to one year

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II at MTD32

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Patients With Dose Limiting Toxicity

The number of patients who had a DLT during the dose finding/confirming portion (Phase I) of the trial for the safety of the combination of sorafenib, vorinostat, and bortezomib. (NCT01534260)
Timeframe: up to 9 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I Dose Escalating0

[back to top]

Frequency and Severity of Toxicity as Graded According to the Cancer Therapeutic Evaluation Program (CTEP) Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 4.0

Maximum grade per participant of any AE. (NCT01536067)
Timeframe: Every 30 days for 2 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3
Treatment (Monoclonal Antibody Therapy)003

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time between randomization and death. Death of a participant regardless of the cause was considered as an event. (NCT01539083)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Thalidomide + Prednisolone [TP Consolidation]NA
Bortezomib + Thalidomide + Prednisolone [VTP Consolidation]NA

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS, calculated as the time between randomization to disease progression or death (regardless of cause), whichever occurred first. Progressive disease as per IMWG criteria: increase of >= 25 percent from lowest response level in Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dL]) Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24 hour. Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain levels. The absolute increase must be >10 mg/dL. Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: the absolute percent must be >=10 percent. Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 millimole per liter (mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder. (NCT01539083)
Timeframe: Baseline until progressive disease (up to 5 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Thalidomide + Prednisolone [TP Consolidation]22.05
Bortezomib + Thalidomide + Prednisolone [VTP Consolidation]22.51

[back to top]

Consolidation Phase: Change From Baseline in AQOL-6D Scores at the End of the Consolidation Phase

The assessment of quality of life-6D (AQoL-6D) is a multi-attribute health-related quality of life instrument (QoL). It comprises dimension scores for independent living, relationships, mental health, coping, pain, senses, and utility score for AQol-6D. Each scale ranges between 1 (best QoL) and -0.04 (worst possible QoL). (NCT01539083)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Independent LivingRelationshipsMental HealthCopingPainSensesAQoL-6D Utility score
Bortezomib + Thalidomide + Prednisolone [VTP Consolidation]0.140.050.180.050.200.000.11
Thalidomide + Prednisolone [TP Consolidation]0.150.060.180.080.200.030.11

[back to top]

Consolidation Phase: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

CR as per IMWG criteria is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 percent plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT01539083)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Bortezomib + Thalidomide + Prednisolone [VTP Consolidation]36.744.952.053.1
Thalidomide + Prednisolone [TP Consolidation]36.544.849.051.0

[back to top]

Consolidation Phase: Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR) at Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

sCR as per IMWG criteria is CR plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. CR is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 percent plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT01539083)
Timeframe: Months 3, 6, 9 and 12

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12
Bortezomib + Thalidomide + Prednisolone [VTP Consolidation]23.528.630.628.6
Thalidomide + Prednisolone [TP Consolidation]20.827.126.026.0

[back to top]

Disease-free Survival (DFS)

DFS, defined as the duration from the start of CR to the time of relapse from CR. DFS applied only to participants in CR. CR as per IMWG criteria is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 percent plasma cells in bone marrow. Relapse from CR: reappearance of serum or urine M-protein by immunofixation or electrophoresis; development of >= 5 percent plasma cells in the bone marrow; appearance of any other sign of progression (ie, new plasmacytoma, lytic bone lesion, or hypercalcaemia). (NCT01539083)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Thalidomide + Prednisolone [TP Consolidation]18.53
Bortezomib + Thalidomide + Prednisolone [VTP Consolidation]13.37

[back to top]

Consolidation Phase: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) at Month 12

CR as per IMWG criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and less than (<) 5 percent plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90 percent or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 milligram (mg) per 24 hours. (NCT01539083)
Timeframe: Month 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Thalidomide + Prednisolone [TP Consolidation]81.3
Bortezomib + Thalidomide + Prednisolone [VTP Consolidation]92.9

[back to top]

Consolidation Phase: Change From Baseline in FACT/GOG-NTX Total Score at the End of the Consolidation Phase

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX) consists of 10 items and evaluates symptoms and concerns associated specifically with chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. 1 FACT/GOG-NTX total score has a range of 0 to 108 with a higher score indicating better quality of life. (NCT01539083)
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Thalidomide + Prednisolone [TP Consolidation]2.9
Bortezomib + Thalidomide + Prednisolone [VTP Consolidation]1.0

[back to top]

Number of Grade 3 Non-hematologic and Grade 4 Hematologic Serious Adverse Events Associated With the Addition of Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone Into Autologous Transplant Regimens.

To determine whether bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone with transplant 1 and velcade/gemcitabine with transplant 2 can be safely incorporated into well-tested pre-transplant regimens of high-dose melphalan and carmustine/melphalan in doses equivalent to the BEAM(BCNU, etoposide, arabinoside, melphalan)regimen. Treatment-related toxicities will be compared to those reported in the literature using similar intensive approaches. (NCT01548573)
Timeframe: 2 years

Intervention ()
Tandem Transplant in MM <12 Mos of Prior Treatment0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

To determine the median overall survival based on an intent-to-treat analysis, which should exceed 10 years, based on the projected 10-year survival of Total Therapy III, keeping in mind that participants are included in this protocol with up to 12 months of prior therapy. (NCT01548573)
Timeframe: 10 years

Intervention ()
Tandem Transplant in MM <12 Mos of Prior Treatment0

[back to top]

Event-Free Survival (EFS)

To determine whether, in comparison to Total Therapy II, the median Event-Free Survival (EFS) can be increased from 4.8 years to 7.2 years, which represents an increase in median EFS of approximately 50%, based on an intent-to-treat analysis. (NCT01548573)
Timeframe: 8 years

Intervention ()
Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplant0

[back to top]

Identification of Drug Resistant Genes

To determine whether repeated bone marrow samples analyzed for gene expression profiling (GEP) can identify genes related to drug resistance in myeloma. The drug resistant genes or the gene products might then be targeted specifically to eradicate myeloma cells surviving tandem transplantation. (NCT01548573)
Timeframe: 5 years

Intervention ()
Tandem Transplant in MM <12 Mos of Prior Treatment0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Suffer Mortality, a Serious Adverse Event, or Other Adverse Event During the Study Period

Percentage of study patients who experience a serious safety issue during the three phases of the study as measured by all cause mortality, serious adverse reactions and other adverse reactions. (NCT01556347)
Timeframe: 583 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
All Cause Mortality0
Serious Adverse Events2
Other Adverse Events2

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Experience CMV, PTLD, and PML

Percentage of patients who experience cytomegalovirus (CMV), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) during the study period. (NCT01556347)
Timeframe: 583 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Incidnce of CMV, PTLD, PML0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Transplanted

Percentage of patients, who are transplanted within one year of finishing the Bortezomib treatment phase. (NCT01556347)
Timeframe: 365 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Heart Transplant Candidates0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients Who Experience Grade 3 and Above Non-Hematologic Toxicities

Percentage of patients who experience of grade 3 and above non-hematologic toxicities as measured by the incidence of hypersensitivity reaction, fever, nausea and vomiting or dehydration during the study period. (NCT01556347)
Timeframe: 583 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Hypersensitivity ReactionFeverNausea and VomitingDehydration
Percentage of Patients With Grade and Above Non-Hematologic Ti1111

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Who Experience Either a Respiratory Tract Infection or a Urinary Tract Infection

The percentage of study patients who experience infectious complications in either the respiratory or urinary tracts during the study period. (NCT01556347)
Timeframe: 583 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Respiratory Tract Infections1
Urinary Tract Infections1

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With Grade 4 Hematologic Toxicities

A Grade 4 hematologic toxicity includes a platelet count < 25,000/mm3 or an absolute neutrophil count < 500/mm3 (NCT01556347)
Timeframe: 583 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Percentage of Patients With Grade 4 Hemotologic Toxicities0

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With a Reduction in CPRA to Less Than 20%

Percentage of highly sensitized heart transplant candidates, (patients with a CPRA greater than 50%), who have desensitization therapy, and then achieve a reduction in alloantibody such that their CPRA falls below 20%. For an individual patient, the outcome measure time frame is the one year of the Recovery Phase which begins after 218 days from the time that the patient begins the Induction Immunotherapy Phase, which is the same as the end of the Bortezomib Treatment Phase. (NCT01556347)
Timeframe: 365 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Heart Transplant Candidates0

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Who Experience Exacerbations Cardiac Dysrhythmias or Heart Failure

The percentage of study patients who experience an exacerbation of cardiac dysrhythmias and heart failure during the study period (NCT01556347)
Timeframe: 583 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Percentage of Patients With Exacerbation of Heart Failure0
Percentage of Patients With Exacerbation of Dysrythmias0

[back to top]

The Percentage of Patients Who Experience Any Grade of Peripheral Neuropathy

The percentage of patients in the study who experience any grade of peripheral neuropathy during the study period (NCT01556347)
Timeframe: 583 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Highly Sensitized Heart Transplant Candidates1

[back to top]

Pharmacodynamics (PD): Change From Baseline in B-cell Subset Fractions

CD19+ peripheral B-cells counts are based on the percentage of total leukocyte population and absolute cell counts. (NCT01556438)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 1 and Cycle 7: prior to first tabalumab dose.

,
Interventionpercentage of b-cell change (Mean)
BaselineCycle 1, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1
100 mg Tabalumab+BTZ IV+Dex9.31.1NA
300 mg Tabalumab+BTZ IV+Dex12.50.3-14.4

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-∞) of Tabalumab (LY2127399)

(NCT01556438)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1: 6 + or - hours after bortezomib (BTZ); Cycle 7, Day 1: immediately post BTZ dose and 2 hours after tabalumab

,,
Interventionng*hr/mL (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1
100 mg Tabalumab+BTZ IV+Dex13300NA
300 mg Tabalumab+ IV BTZ +Dex6420084100
300 mg Tabalumab+ SC BTZ +Dex50900131000

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Tabalumab (LY2127399)

(NCT01556438)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1: 6 + or - hours after bortezomib (BTZ); Cycle 7, Day 1: immediately post BTZ dose and 2 hours after tabalumab

,,
Interventionmicrogram per milliliter (μg/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1
100 mg Tabalumab+BTZ IV+Dex38.570.5
300 mg Tabalumab+ IV BTZ +Dex154179
300 mg Tabalumab+ SC BTZ +Dex139220

[back to top] [back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

DoR is defined as the time from the date when the measurement criteria are met for CR, CRu, or PR (whichever status is recorded first) until the date of first observation of measured progressive disease. For responding participants who die without progressive disease (including death from study disease),DoR will be censored at the date of death. For responding participants not known to have died as of the data cut-off date and who do not have progressive disease, DoR will be censored at the last objective progression-free assessment date prior to the data cut-off date. (NCT01556438)
Timeframe: Time from Response until measured Progressive Disease (up to 455 days)

Interventionmonths (Number)
100 mg Tabalumab+BTZ IV+DexNA
300 mg Tabalumab+BTZ +DexNA

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the time from the date of study enrollment to the date of objectively determined progressive disease. TTP will be censored at the date of the last objective progression free disease assessment. (NCT01556438)
Timeframe: Baseline to date of Progressive Disease (up to 455 days)

Interventionmonths (Median)
100 mg Tabalumab+BTZ IV+DexNA
300 mg Tabalumab+BTZ +DexNA

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Tumor Response (Tumor Response Rate)

"Stringent Complete Response- Complete response in addition to normal free light chain ration and no clonal cells in bone marrow.~Complete Response- no monoclonal protein (mp) in blood, no serum or urine mp, less than 5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Very Good Partial Response-more than 90% decrease in mp and urine protein. Partial Response- over 50% decrease in serum mp. Stable Disease- less than 25 percent decrease of monoclonal protein. Progressive Disease- 25% increase compared to lowest value of serum mp, urine mp, no measurable mp." (NCT01556438)
Timeframe: Baseline to disease progression (up to 421 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Numbers of RespondersStringent Complete Response (sCR)Complete Response (CR)Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)Partial Response(PR)Stable Disease(SD)Progressive Disease
100 mg Tabalumab+BTZ IV+Dex4002200
300 mg Tabalumab+ IV BTZ +Dex5001423

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Plasma Concentration (AUC0-tlast) of Tabalumab (LY2127399)

(NCT01556438)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1: 6 + or - hours after bortezomib (BTZ); Cycle 7, Day 1: immediately post BTZ dose and 2 hours after tabalumab

,,
Interventionhours times nanograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1
100 mg Tabalumab+BTZ IV+Dex81009400
300 mg Tabalumab IV BTZ +Dex3460027300
300 mg Tabalumab+ SC BTZ +Dex2690022900

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Significant Reduction in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

"A significant reduction in LVEF was defined as a ≥ 10% decrease (absolute change) from baseline in participants whose baseline LVEF is ≤ 55%.~For participants with LVEF > 55% at baseline, a significant change was defined as a decrease in LVEF to < 45%." (NCT01568866)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + DEX2.6
Carfilzomib + DEX0.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival

"Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death (whatever the cause). Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up as of the data analysis cut-off date were censored at the patient's date of last contact (last known to be alive).~Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT01568866)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 03 January 2017; median follow-up time for OS was 36.9 and 37.5 months for each treatment group respectively.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib + DEX40.0
Carfilzomib + DEX47.6

[back to top]

Overall Response

"Disease response was evaluated according to the IMWG-URC by the IRC. Overall response was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of partial response (PR), very good PR (VGPR), complete response (CR) or stringent CR (sCR).~sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM).~CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein with urine M-protein <100 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline.~PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in urine M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline." (NCT01568866)
Timeframe: Disease response was assessed every 28 days until end of treatment or the data cut-off date of 10 November 2014; median duration of treatment was 27 weeks in the bortezomib group and 40 weeks in the carfilzomib treatment group.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + DEX62.6
Carfilzomib + DEX76.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy

"Neuropathy events were defined as Grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy as specified by peripheral neuropathy Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query, narrow (scope) (SMQN) terms.~Peripheral neuropathy was assessed by neurologic exam and graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03:~Grade 1: Asymptomatic; Grade 2: Moderate symptoms, limiting instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) Grade 3: Severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death." (NCT01568866)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug as of the data cut-off date of 10 November 2014; median duration of treatment was 27 weeks in the bortezomib group and 40 weeks in the carfilzomib treatment group.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + DEX32.0
Carfilzomib + DEX6.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause. Participants were evaluated for disease response and progression according to the International Myeloma Working Group-Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC) as assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC).~Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants with no baseline disease assessments, starting a new anticancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, death or disease progression immediately after more than 1 consecutively missed disease assessment visit, or alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cut-off date were censored." (NCT01568866)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 10 November 2014; median follow-up time for PFS was 11.1.and 11.9 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib + DEX9.4
Carfilzomib + DEX18.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP)

Pulmonary artery pressure was measured using transthoracic echocardiogram. (NCT01568866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24 and 36 and at end of treatment (median duration of treatment was 27 weeks in the bortezomib group and 40 weeks in the carfilzomib treatment group).

,
InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Week 12 (n=34, 30)Week 24 (n=22, 20)Week 36 (n=12, 14)End of Treatment (n=21, 14)
Bortezomib + DEX0.31.74.03.4
Carfilzomib + DEX2.83.42.60.9

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Right Ventricular Fractional Area Change (FAC)

Right ventricular function was assessed by measuring fractional area change (FAC) on echocardiogram. (NCT01568866)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 12, 24 and 36 and at end of treatment (median duration of treatment was 27 weeks in the bortezomib group and 40 weeks in the carfilzomib treatment group).

,
Interventionpercent fractional area change (Mean)
Week 12 (n=40, 40)Week 24 (n=26, 31)Week 36 (n=15, 18)End of Treatment (n=23, 18)
Bortezomib + DEX-0.70.7-0.50.4
Carfilzomib + DEX-1.1-1.0-0.5-1.9

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response (DOR) was calculated for participants who achieved an sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR. Duration of response is defined as the time from first evidence of PR or better to confirmation of disease progression or death due to any cause. Median duration of response was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants with no baseline disease assessments, starting a new anticancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, death or disease progression immediately after more than 1 consecutively missed disease assessment visit, or alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cut-off date were censored. (NCT01568866)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 10 November 2014; median follow-up time for DOR was 9.4 and 10.4 months for each treatment group respectively.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib + DEX10.4
Carfilzomib + DEX21.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With >30% Reduction in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Worst Pain Score

"BPI is assessed by 7 questions rated 0 for no pain and higher numbers indicated more pain." (NCT01602224)
Timeframe: Baseline through End of Treatment (19 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib37
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib30
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Dexamethasone + Bortezomib30

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall Response Rate (ORR) is the percentage of participants that had a response. (NCT01602224)
Timeframe: Baseline to Objective Disease Progression or Initiation of New Cancer Treatment (28 Months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib58.1
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib59.5
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Dexamethasone + Bortezomib61.1

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival is the duration from enrollment to death from any cause. For participants who were alive, overall survival was censored at the last contact. (NCT01602224)
Timeframe: Baseline to Death From Any Cause (assessed up to 19 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+BortezomibNA
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+BortezomibNA
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Dexamethasone + BortezomibNA

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from date of first dose to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause. If a participant does not have a complete baseline disease assessment, then the PFS time is censored at the enrollment date, regardless of whether or not objectively determined disease progression (Increase of > 25% from lowest response in serum M component, urine M component, bone marrow plasma cell percentage, development of bone lesions) or death has been observed for the participant. If a participant is not known to have died or have objective progression as of the data inclusion cutoff date for the analysis, the PFS time is censored at the last complete objective progression-free disease assessment date. (NCT01602224)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Objective Disease Progression or Death From Any Cause (assessed up to 9 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib6.6
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib7.5
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Dexamethasone + Bortezomib7.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first observed objective progression or death due to study disease. Time to progression will be censored as for PFS for those participants not known to have progressed or that died from other causes. (NCT01602224)
Timeframe: Baseline to Objective Disease Progression or Death (assessed up to 9 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib6.6
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib8.2
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Dexamethasone + Bortezomib8.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Given Best Objective Myeloma Response (Quality of Response [QoR])

Response categories in order of decreasing quality are: Stringent Complete Response(sCR),Complete Response(CR), Very Good Partial Response(VGPR),Partial Response(PR),Minimal Response(MR),Stable Disease(SD), or Progressive Disease(PD), according to the International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma.SCR:normal free light chain ration and no clonal cells in bone marrow;CR-no monoclonal protein(mp) in blood, no serum/urine,<5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR-more than 90% decrease in mp and urine protein; PR->50% decrease in serum MP;SD-<25% decrease in mp; PD-25% increase compared to lowest value of serum mp, urine mp and no measurable mp. (NCT01602224)
Timeframe: Baseline to Objective Disease Progression or Initiation of New Cancer Treatment (up to 28 Months)

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Stringent Complete ResponseComplete ResponseVery Good Partial ResponsePartial ResponseMinimal ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib11010236146
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib0416238107
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Dexamethasone + Bortezombib249296126

[back to top] [back to top]

PK: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Tabalumab

(NCT01602224)
Timeframe: C1 D1: Predose, 3O minutes, 2 hours Postdose; C1 D4, 8, 11: Predose, (D11 only, 30 minutes Postdose); C2 and C6-C10 D1: Predose and immediately Postdose; C2 D 4, 8, 11: Anytime

,
Interventionhours (Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Steady State (Cycle 6-10)
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib1.50.920.75
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib1.580.760.73

[back to top]

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Tabalumab

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Tabalumab. (NCT01602224)
Timeframe: Cycle (C)1 Day (D)1: Predose, 3O minutes, 2 hours Postdose; C1 D4, 8, 11: Predose, (D11 only, 30 minutes Postdose); C2 and C6-C10 D1: Predose and immediately Postdose; C2 D 4, 8, 11: Anytime

,
Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Steady State (Cycle 6-10)
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib38.047.969.0
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib103131189

[back to top]

PK: Area Under the Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC-T) for Tabalumab

(NCT01602224)
Timeframe: C1 D1: Predose, 3O minutes, 2 hours Postdose; C1 D4, 8, 11: Predose, (D11 only, 30 minutes Postdose); C2 and C6-C10 D1: Predose and immediately Postdose; C2 D 4, 8, 11: Anytime

,
Interventionmicrograms times hour per milliliter (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1Cycle 2Steady State (Cycle 6-10)
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib77901160025300
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib22203540070100

[back to top]

Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) in Each Category

Stringent Complete Response-Complete Response and normal free light chain ration and no clonal cells in bone marrow Complete Response- no monoclonal protein (mp) in blood, no serum or urine mp, less than 5% plasma cells in bone marrow Very Good Partial Response-more than 90% decrease in mp and urine protein Partial Response- over 50% decrease in serum mp Stable Disease- less than 25 percent decrease of monoclonal protein Progressive Disease- 25% increase compared to lowest value of serum mp, urine mp, no measurable mp (NCT01602224)
Timeframe: Baseline to Objective Disease Progression or Initiation of New Cancer Treatment (28 Months)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stringent Complete ResponseComplete ResponseVery Good Partial ResponsePartial ResponseMinimal ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive Disease
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib11010236146
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib0416238107
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Dexamethasone + Bortezomib249296126

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DoR)

DOR is measured by the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria: from the date of first evidence of a confirmed response to the date of objective progression or the date of death due to any cause, whichever is earlier. If a responder is not known to have died or have objective progression as of the data inclusion cutoff date, the DOR time will be censored at the last complete objective progression-free disease assessment date. Progressive disease is an increase of 25% from baseline in Serum M, Urine M, bone marrow plasma cell increase of 10 %, development of new bone lesions, development of new soft tissue plasmacytomas or bone lesions, hypercalcemia >11.5 milligrams per deciliter, decrease in hemoglobin of 2 grams per deciliter, rise in serum creatinine by 2 mg/deciliter. (NCT01602224)
Timeframe: Time from Response to Objective Disease Progression (assessed up to 38 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
100 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib7.9
300 mg Tabalumab+Dexamethasone+Bortezomib8.6
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Dexamethasone + Bortezomib7.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival

The overall survival of patients was measured of a period of 2 years. (NCT01605032)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Busulfan, Melphalan, Bortezomib, Autologous PBSCT)18

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

The progression free survival was assessed over a period of 2 years (NCT01605032)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Busulfan, Melphalan, Bortezomib, Autologous PBSCT)11

[back to top]

Rate of Complete Response as Determined by the IMWG Criteria

Number of patients achieved complete response after the treatment regimen (NCT01605032)
Timeframe: Day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Busulfan, Melphalan, Bortezomib, Autologous PBSCT)2

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01605032)
Timeframe: Up to day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Complete responsePartial response
Treatment (Busulfan, Melphalan, Bortezomib, Autologous PBSCT)217

[back to top]

Mortality

(NCT01605032)
Timeframe: Up to day 100

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment (Busulfan, Melphalan, Bortezomib, Autologous PBSCT)1

[back to top]

Toxicity of V-BEAM

"Graded per the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0.~Patients are evaluated from first receiving study treatment until a 30-day follow-up after the conclusion of treatment for adverse events not resulting in death. Adverse events resulting in death will be evaluated through Day +100.~This outcomes measures the common toxicities observed. Please refer to the Serious Adverse Event and Other Adverse Event sections of the results for further details." (NCT01653418)
Timeframe: 30 days after end of treatment / Day +100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Neutropenic feverClostridium difficile colitisNeutropenic colitis without Clostridium difficileSepsisMucositis (grade 1-2)Mucositis (grade 3-4)Diarrhea (grade 3-4)Hepatic toxicity (grade 3-4)Peripheral neuropathy (grade 1-2)Toxic death
V-BEAM + Stem Cell Infusion103338210122

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate (Complete Response + Stringent Complete Response)

Defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria (NCT01653418)
Timeframe: Day +100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
V-BEAM + Stem Cell Infusion6

[back to top]

Very Good Partial Response Rate (VGPR+nCR+sCR+CR)

Response will be assessed per the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria. (NCT01653418)
Timeframe: Day +100

Interventionparticipants (Number)
V-BEAM + Stem Cell Infusion8

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the duration from the time of transplant to death or last follow-up. (NCT01653418)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 6 months (range: 6-12 months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Expired Day +3Expired Day +18Alive
V-BEAM + Stem Cell Infusion118

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"PFS is defined as the duration from transplant to time of first progression, death, relapse after CR, or the date the patient was last known to be in remission.~Response will be assessed per the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria." (NCT01653418)
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 6 months (range: 6.0-12.0 months)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
No relapse/progressionRelapse/progression at 12 months
V-BEAM + Stem Cell Infusion71

[back to top]

Time to Platelet Engraftment After V-BEAM.

Time to platelet engraftment is defined as the duration between Day 0 to the first day of platelet count sustained at > 20x109/L without transfusion. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment will be reported. (NCT01653418)
Timeframe: Day +100

Interventiondays (Median)
More than 20 x 10^9/LMore than 50 x 10^9/L
V-BEAM + Stem Cell Infusion22.523

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

"ORR includes Partial Response (PR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) + Complete Response (CR)~Response will be assessed per the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Response Criteria." (NCT01653418)
Timeframe: 3 months following Day +100 visit

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Partial responseVery good partial responseComplete response
V-BEAM + Stem Cell Infusion026

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil Engraftment After V-BEAM.

Time to neutrophil engraftment is defined as duration between Day 0 to the first day of ANC > 0.5x109/L post transplant when it is sustained for more than three consecutive days. (NCT01653418)
Timeframe: Day +100

Interventiondays (Median)
V-BEAM + Stem Cell Infusion10

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression or death due to any cause.~Per the International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma, progression is defined as >=1 of Serum M protein increase >= 25% from lowest response level, with an absolute increase of >= 0.5g/dL; Urine M protein increase >= 25% from lowest response level, with an absolute increase of >= 200 mg/24 hrs; If participant had serum M protein <1 g/dL, urine M protein <200 mg/24 hrs, and an involved serum free light chain level >= 10mg/dL at baseline: >= 25% increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved serum free light chain level with an absolute increase of >= 10 mg/dL; Bone marrow plasma cell % increase =25% from baseline with the absolute plasma cell % >=10%; New bone lesions or soft tissue plasmocytomas, or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmocytomas; Development of hypercalcemia that can be attributed solely to multiple myeloma" (NCT01668719)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years post registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone)33.6
Arm II (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Elotuzumab)31.5

[back to top]

Phase I: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Elotuzumab in Combination With Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone

"Assess safety of elotuzumab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone and select the optimal dose of elotuzumab for the Phase II portion from 10mg/kg on each cycle, to 5mg/kg on each cycle MTD reflects the highest dose that had a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of ≤ 1/6 participants. DLTs were defined as treatment regimen related: grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicity; grade 3 nausea or diarrhea despite anti-emetic and anti-diarrheal therapy; grade 3 hyperglycemia if symptomatic or glucose level > 300mg/ml despite insulin and/or oral diabetic therapy; grade 4 neutropenia ≥ 7 days or grade 3/4 neutropenia with fever (≥ 38.5 oC); grade 4 thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days or associated with hemorrhage; delay of treatment with any agent by > 2 weeks due to drug related toxicity.~DLT were graded using the NCI CTCAE version 4.0~Note:~i) the second, lower dose level was not tested as the first dose level was deemed safe ii) 6 participants were evaluable at phase I analysis" (NCT01668719)
Timeframe: time from first participants randomized until at least 6 patients were evaluable for DLTs. DLTs were assessed only during Cycle 1 (21 days)

Interventionmg/kg (Phase II dosing for elotuzumab) (Number)
Phase I Dose Level 1 (Elotuzumab, 10mg, and Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone)10

[back to top]

Overall Survival

From date of registration to date of death due to any cause (NCT01668719)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years post registration

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone)NA
Arm II (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Elotuzumab)68

[back to top] [back to top]

Response (Partial Response [PR] or Better) Rate

Percentage of participants with PR or better to treatment per the International Uniform Response Criteria for Multiple Myeloma stringent Complete Response- CR criteria + normal serum free light chain (FLC) ratio + absence of clonal cells in bone marrow (BM) by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence CR- Negative immunofixation (IFX) on serum & urine M proteins + <5% plasma cells in BM + disappearance of soft tissue plasmocytomas (STP) very good PR- PR criteria + serum & urine M proteins detectable by IFX but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction (RED) in serum M protein & urine M protein <100 g/24 hrs PR- >=50% RED in size of STP, if present at baseline & >=50% RED in plasma cells, if >=30% plasma cells in BM at baseline: & RED in serum M protein of >=50% & in urine M protein of >= 90% or to 200 mg/24hr OR if serum M protein <1 g/dL, urine M protein <200 mg/24 hrs, & involved serum FLC level >= 10 mg/dl at baseline: >= 50% RED in (involved-uninvolved) serum FLC levels (NCT01668719)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years post registration

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm I (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone)88
Arm II (Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone, Elotuzumab)83

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose of the Combination of ASP7487 (OSI-906) With Velcade and Dexamethasone

"Phase 1: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ASP7487 (OSI-906) administered in combination with the recommended dose and schedule of bortezomib and dexamethasone;~Phase 2: To evaluate the antitumor activity of ASP7487 (OSI-906) in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone at the MTD established from the Phase 1 component." (NCT01672736)
Timeframe: 45 months

Interventionmilligrams (Number)
Linsitinib starting dose in milligramsLinsitinib maximum dose in milligrams
ASP7487, Velcade, Dexamethasone75150

[back to top]

The Primary Objective of This Study Will be to Investigate the Incidence and Severity of Peripheral Neuropathy Caused by a Prior Intravenous VELCADE-containing Regimen in Comparison to That Caused by a Subcutaneous VELCADE-containing Regimen.

"Definition of incidence: the number of participants enrolled in the study experiencing treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy. Emergence of peripheral neuropathy is determined via neurological assessment conducted on Day 1 and Day 11 of each treatment cycle as well as during the End of Study visit.~Definition of severity: the severity of any treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy experienced by a patient on-study. Peripheral neuropathy severity is determined via neurological assessment conducted on Day 1 and Day 11 of each treatment cycle as well as the End of Study visit and is graded on a 0-4 scale based on CTCAE criteria.~Incidence of Peripheral Neuropathy Definition: the number of participants enrolled in the study experiencing treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy. Emergence of peripheral neuropathy is determined via neurological assessment conducted on Day 1 and Day 11 of each treatment cycle as well as during the End of Study visit." (NCT01695330)
Timeframe: Subjects eligible for this study will receive treatment with study drug for a maximum of eight 28 day treatment cycles.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Subcutaneous Bortezomib5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

The distribution of progression-free survival will be estimated by arm using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01706666)
Timeframe: From registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

InterventionMonths to Progression (Number)
Arm ANA
Arm B9.2
Arm CNA

[back to top]

Proportion of Patients Experiencing a Stringent Complete Response (sCR) After 12 Cycles, 24 Months

Estimated by the number of sCRs divided by the total number of evaluable patients in each arm. Exact binomial confidence intervals for the true sCR rate will be calculated by arm. Stringent complete response (sCR) is defined as a complete response plus normal serum free light chain ratio and the absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by flow cytometry. (NCT01706666)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A100
Arm B0
Arm C100

[back to top]

Survival Time

The distribution of survival time will be estimated by arm using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01706666)
Timeframe: From registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years

InterventionMonths to death (Number)
Arm ANA
Arm BNA
Arm CNA

[back to top]

Efficacy of Velcade

Effect of VELCADE at 1.0-1.3 mg/m2 dose on platelet aggregation at 24 and 48 hour post-infusion in patients with multiple myeloma. The following components of platelet aggregation were evaluated at varying levels: Collagen, Adenine di-Phosphate (ADP), Arachidonic acid, and Ristocetin. (NCT01720043)
Timeframe: 48 hours

Interventionpercentage (Mean)
Collagen 5.g.ml, 24 hrsCollagen 2.g.ml, 24 hrsADP.10.M, 24 hrsADP.5.M, 24 hrsADP.3.M, 24 hrsArach.Acid.0.5.mg.ml, 24 hrsRistocetin1.5.mg.ml, 24 hrsRistocetin.0.5.mg.ml, 24 hrsCollagen.5.g.mL, 48 hrsCollagen.2.g.mL, 48 hrsADP.10.M, 48 hrsADP.5.M, 48 hrsADP.3.M, 48 hrsArach.Acid.0.5.mg.mL, 48 hrsRistocetin.1.5.mg.mL, 48 hrsRistocetin.0.5.mg.mL, 48 hrs
All Participants-4.143-4.429-4.571-6.429-7.571-11.143-1.429-2.429-2.429-0.857-3.429-3.5711.571-2.286.0143-2.000

[back to top]

QLQ-C30 Question 30

"Measured as mean quality of life in study subjects, quantitatively scored using the standardized and validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ). Question 30: How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?~7 point scores are standardized to a scale of 0-100, where 100 means highest possible quality." (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 5 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 months5 months
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid51.766.766.7

[back to top]

Maximum Depth of Response During Maintenance Therapy

"Defined as maximum depth of response (ranging from partial response to complete response by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria at any point during post-induction maintenance therapy.~IMWG: Complete Response (CR): negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, no soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow; stringent CR: CR+normal free light chain ratio, no clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence; Very Good Partial Response: serum and urine M-protein detected by immunofixation but not electrophoresis, >90% in serum M-protein+urine, M-protein level <100 mg/24hour; Partial Response (PR): ≥50% decrease of serum and M-protein, 24 hour urinary M-protein decrease by ≥90% or <200 mg/24hour. Stable disease mean that the patient has not achieved CR, VGPR, PR or progressive disease." (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stable DiseasePartial ResponseVery good partial responseComplete Response/Stringent complete responseProgressive Disease/no response
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid13050380

[back to top]

Maximum Depth of Response During Induction Therapy

Maximum depth of response is defined as: ranging from partial response to complete response by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). Described as number of patients achieving each level of response. IMWG: CR: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, no soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow; sCR: CR+normal free light chain ratio, no clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence; VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detected by immunofixation but not electrophoresis, >90% in serum M-protein+urine, M-protein level <100 mg/24hour; PR: ≥50% decrease of serum and M-protein, 24 hour urinary M-protein decrease by ≥90% or <200 mg/24hour. Stable disease mean that the patient has not achieved CR, VGPR, PR or progressive disease. (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: Up to 8 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Stable DiseasePartial ResponseVery good partial response (VGPR)Complete Response/Stringent complete responseProgressive Disease/no response
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid217292914

[back to top]

Severe Adverse Event Rate

Defined as number of patients experiencing any grade or severe (≥ grade 3 by common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v4.0 criteria) adverse events at any time during the study (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid64

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR) During Induction Therapy

"Defined as percentage of patients achieving a partial response or better by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) standard criteria:~IMWG: Complete Response (CR): negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, no soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in the bone marrow; stringent CR: CR+normal free light chain ratio, no clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence; Very Good Partial Response: serum and urine M-protein detected by immunofixation but not electrophoresis, >90% in serum M-protein+urine, M-protein level <100 mg/24hour; Partial Response (PR): ≥50% decrease of serum and M-protein, 24 hour urinary M-protein decrease by ≥90% or <200 mg/24hour." (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: Up to 8 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid64

[back to top]

Median Progression-free Survival

Defined as median time elapsed in study subjects between initiation of study therapy and either disease progression or death, regardless of cause of death. (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid24.2

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

Defined as median time elapsed in study subjects between initiation of study therapy and death, regardless of cause. (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid29.7

[back to top]

Median Duration of Response

Defined as median time elapsed in study subjects between achievement of response and disease progression. (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: From date of first confirmed response until date of disease progression or up to 3 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid26.2

[back to top]

Functionality as Assessed Using the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Geriatric Assessment Tool

"Mean functionality in study subjects, quantitatively scored using the standardized and validated Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Geriatric Assessment Tool, which comprehensively assesses aspects of a patient's functionality such as symptoms (e.g., pain, anxiety), social support (e.g., someone to turn to for help), and ability to carry out routine activities (e.g., grocery shopping) or physical exertion (e.g., climbing stairs) was assessed at baseline.~The score is obtained by inserting patient-specific data into the online calculator found at http://www.mycarg.org/Chemo_Toxicity_Calculator, which is based on the risk score described in Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, et al. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(25):3457-3465.~The risk score ranges from 0-19, with 0-5 indicating low risk, 6-9 intermediate risk, and 10-19 high risk for severe (grade >2) toxicity." (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: baseline

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid10

[back to top]

Median Time to Response

Defined as median time to achievement of response (partial remission or better by International Myeloma Working Group standard criteria), in study subjects during 8 months of induction chemotherapy. (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: Up to 8 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid2

[back to top]

QLQ-C30 Question 29

Measured as mean quality of life in study subjects, quantitatively scored using the standardized and validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ). Question 29: how would you rate your overall health during the past week? 7 point scores are standardized to a scale of 0-100, where 100 means highest possible quality. (NCT01729338)
Timeframe: baseline, 3 months, 5 months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline3 months5 months
Velcade, Cyclophosphamide, Revlimid58.36568.3

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate by Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC)

"The ORR together with the relative proportions in each response category (ie, stringent CR [sCR], CR, very good PR [VGPR], PR, SD, and PD) by treatment using the IMWG criteria will be examined.~Complete Response: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow~SCR: CR+ Normal FLC ratio and Absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence~VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine Mprotein level < 100 mg per 24 hours~PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hours~Progressive Disease: Please refer to Primary outcome measure for definition~SD: Not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or progressive disease" (NCT01734928)
Timeframe: From randomization to progressive disease or death during the IRAC assessment period, up to approximately 42 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stringent complete responseComplete ReponseVery Good Partial ResponsePartial ResponseStable DiseaseProgressive DiseaseNot Evaluable
Treatment 1: POM+BTZ+LD-DEX9351048332117
Treatment 2: BTZ+LD-DEX2940881061617

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival by Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC)

"Progression free survival (PFS) will be calculated as the time between the randomization and progressive disease (PD) or death.~Progressive Disease is defined as an Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in:~Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be ≥ 0.5 g/dL)g~Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be ≥ 200 mg/24 hours)~In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, the absolute increase must be > 100 mg/dL.~Bone marrow plasma cell percentage, the absolute % must be ≥ 10%h~Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. -Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.65 mmol/L) that can be attributed solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder." (NCT01734928)
Timeframe: From randomization to progressive disease or death during the IRAC assessment period, up to approximately 42 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment 1: POM+BTZ+LD-DEX11.20
Treatment 2: BTZ+LD-DEX7.10

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. (NCT01734928)
Timeframe: From randomization to date of death, up to approximately 65 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment 1: POM+BTZ+LD-DEX35.58
Treatment 2: BTZ+LD-DEX31.61

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 5 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose date of the study treatment and within 28 days after the last dose date. (NCT01734928)
Timeframe: From first dose to 28 days after the last dose (up to approximately 44 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment 1: POM+BTZ+LD-DEX29
Treatment 2: BTZ+LD-DEX12

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Grade 3-4 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as any AE occurring or worsening on or after the first dose date of the study treatment and within 28 days after the last dose date. (NCT01734928)
Timeframe: From first dose to 28 days after the last dose (up to approximately 44 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment 1: POM+BTZ+LD-DEX259
Treatment 2: BTZ+LD-DEX194

[back to top]

Duration of Response by Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC)

"Duration of myeloma response is defined as the duration from the time when the IMWG response criteria are first met for sCR or CR or VGPR or PR until the first date the response criteria are met for PD or until the subject died from any cause, whichever occurs first.~Complete Response: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow~SCR: CR+ Normal FLC ratio and Absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence~VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine Mprotein level < 100 mg per 24 hours~PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hours~Progressive Disease: Please refer to Primary outcome measure for definition~SD: Not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or progressive disease" (NCT01734928)
Timeframe: From randomization to progressive disease or death during the IRAC assessment period, up to approximately 42 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment 1: POM+BTZ+LD-DEX13.70
Treatment 2: BTZ+LD-DEX10.94

[back to top]

Toxicity Information Recorded Will Include the Type, Severity, Time of Onset, Time of Resolution, and the Probable Association With the Study Regimen.

Toxicity will be evaluated based on the standard NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects CTCAE) V.4.0 grading criteria. (NCT01736943)
Timeframe: Up to two years

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Abdominal painAlanine aminotransferase increasedAnemiaAnorexiaAspartate aminotransferase increasedChillsConstipationCoughDiarrheaDizzinessDyspneaEdema limbsEpitaxisFatigueFebrile neutopeniaGastrointestinal disorders - Other, gum tendernessGeneralized muscle weaknessHeadacheHypoalbuminemiaHypocalcemiaHypokalemiaHyponatremiaHypotensionInfections and infestations - Other, bacteremiaInsomniaLymphocyte count decreasedMalaiseMucositis oralNauseaNeutrophil count decreasedPeripheral sensory neuropathyPlatelet count decreasedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders - Other, tachypneaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - Other, EcchymosesVomitingWhite blood cell decreased
Bortezomib + Doxil431774444981034151234564374341244151041834814

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival wil be measured as the time from start of treatment to the Date of death or the last date the patient was known to be alive (NCT01736943)
Timeframe: Up to two years

InterventionDays (Median)
Bortezomib + Doxil50

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

The time from first day of treatment to the first observation of disease progression or death due to any cause. If a patient has not progressed or died, progression-free survival is censored at the time of last follow-up. (NCT01736943)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Bortezomib + Doxil21

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Incidence of Grade II-IV GVHD

The primary outcome of this study is the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD up to Day 180 after stem cell infusion. Acute GHVD is graded according to the modified Glucksberg criteria (adapted from Thomas et al., NEJM ,1975, pp. 895-90), which is based on criteria by which the provider classifies acute GVHD per its objective organ staging. Acute GVHD is assessed in weekly standard of care visits post stem cell infusion and is captured in the protocol EDC upon evaluation of clinical notes up to Day 100. Data for acute GVHD organ staging and etiologies are collected in an acute GVHD separate case report form and do not include system organ class, expectedness or attribution. (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Standard of Care)33
Arm B (Experimental)31
Arm C (Experimental)21

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality

Non-relapse mortality by 1 year after stem cell infusion. (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Standard of Care)11
Arm B (Experimental)15
Arm C (Experimental)6.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease

Rates of chronic GVHD 1 year after stem cell infusion (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Standard of Care)59
Arm B (Experimental)55
Arm C (Experimental)55

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free and Overall Survival

Progression-free and overall survival 1 year post stem cell infusion (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 1 year

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Progression free survivalOverall survival
Arm A (Standard of Care)6472
Arm B (Experimental)5763
Arm C (Experimental)5770

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

Relapse relapse-cum-immunosuppression-free survival at 1 year after stem cell infusion (NCT01754389)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Standard of Care)24
Arm B (Experimental)28
Arm C (Experimental)36

[back to top] [back to top]

Response Rate (RR)

"Response Rate (RR) was determined as the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Due to overlap, complete response rate without platelet recovery (CRp) is not included in Response Rate (RR). The outcome is reported as the total number without dispersion.~CR = No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease; trilineage hematopoiesis; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,000/microliter; platelets > 100,000/microliter; < 5% blasts in bone marrow.~CRp = Meets all criteria for CR except platelet count.~PR = Meets all criteria for CR except bone marrow contains 5 to 25% leukemia cells." (NCT01769209)
Timeframe: Day 29

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib + Chemotherapy11

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

"Progression-free survival (PFS) was assessed as survival without progression at 2 years. The outcome is reported as the number (without dispersion) of the participants alive without progression.~Progression = More than 25% increase in circulating and/or bone marrow blasts, or the development of extramedullary disease." (NCT01769209)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib + Chemotherapy3

[back to top]

Failure-free Survival (FFS)

"Failure-free survival (FFS) was assessed as survival without progression or the addition of another systemic therapy, at or within 2 years. The outcome is reported as the number (without dispersion) of the participants alive without progression. Progression is defined below.~Progression = More than 25% increase in circulating and/or bone marrow blasts, or the development of extramedullary disease." (NCT01769209)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib + Chemotherapy3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was assessed as participants remaining alive 2 years after induction therapy. The outcome is reported as the number of participants (without dispersion). (NCT01769209)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib + Chemotherapy5

[back to top]

Complete Response (CR)

"Complete response (CR) was determined the number of participants who achieved CR by Day 29 after induction treatment. The outcome is reported as the total number without dispersion. CR is defined as:~CR = No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease; trilineage hematopoiesis; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,000/microliter; platelets > 100,000/microliter; < 5% blasts in bone marrow.~Not CR = All statuses and conditions if less than or not as defined." (NCT01769209)
Timeframe: Day 29

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib + Chemotherapy11

[back to top]

Complete Response Without Platelet Recovery (CRp)

"Complete response without platelet recovery (CR) was determined as the number of participants who achieved CRp by Day 29 after induction treatment. The outcome is reported as the total number without dispersion. The outcome reflects only those subjects that meet all complete response (CR) criteria except platelet count; participants that meet all criteria including platelet count are not included in this outcome. CR and CRp are defined below.~CR =.No circulating blasts or extramedullary disease; trilineage hematopoiesis; absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,000/microliter; platelets > 100,000/microliter; < 5% blasts in bone marrow.~CRp = Meets all criteria for CR except platelet count." (NCT01769209)
Timeframe: Day 29

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib + Chemotherapy1

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate

"Participants are considered to have achieved an objective response if they meet the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria for any of the following:~Stringent CR: Same as CR plus normal free light chain ratio and absence of clonal cells plasma cells in bone marrow (BM)~CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in BM~VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours~PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. If the serum and urinary M-protein are not measurable, additional criteria are used to assess PR that will not fit in the space provided here. If present at baseline, a ≥50% reduction in the size of plasmacytomas is also required" (NCT01782963)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stringent Complete ResponseComplete Response (CR)Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)Partial Response (PR)
Treatment Arm6161110

[back to top]

Mean Plasma Bortezomib Concentration Following Intravenous and and Subcutaneous Injection

The pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous and subcutaneous bortezomib administration in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. (NCT01782963)
Timeframe: Day 1 (5 min, 30min, 5 hours post dose), Days 8, 15, Day 22 (pre dose and 5 min, 30 min, 5 hrs post dose), cycle 2 day 1 pre dose

,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1, 5 minutes (min) post doseDay 1, 30 min post doseDay 1, 5 hours post doseDay 8 pre-doseDay 15 pre-doseDay 22 pre-doseDay 22, 5 min post-doseDay 22, 30 min post-doseDay 22, 5 hours post-doseCycle 2 Day 1, pre-dose
Intravenous98.848.731.820.440.660.83114.314.92.850.53
Subcutaneous1320.51.960.330.490.6610.2921.694.160.49

[back to top]

Median Time to Response

"Median amount of time from the start of treatment until first documented response as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria~Stringent CR: Same as CR plus normal free light chain ratio and absence of clonal cells plasma cells in bone marrow (BM) CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in BM VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. If the serum and urinary M-protein are not measurable, additional criteria are used to assess PR that will not fit in the space provided here. If present at baseline, a ≥50% reduction in the size of plasmacytomas is also required" (NCT01782963)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until the time of first documented response, median duration of 1.1 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment Arm1.1

[back to top]

Median Progression Free Survival

"The median amount of time as measured from the start of treatment until either death or progression.~Progressive disease requires 1 or more of the following:~>=25% increase from lowest response level in serum M-protein (>=0.5 g/dL absolute increase) and/or urine M-component (>=200 mg/24hr absolute increase)~>=25% increase in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase >10 mg/dL). Only for use in patients without measurable serum and M-protein levels.~>=25% increase in bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute percentage >=10%)~New or increase in existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas~Hypercalcemia (serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) due solely to the plasma cell proliferative disorder." (NCT01782963)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until death or progression or until 3 years after the last participant is enrolled

InterventionMonths (Median)
Treatment Arm35.1

[back to top]

Median Overall Survival

The median overall survival as measured from the start of treatment until the time of death due to any cause. (NCT01782963)
Timeframe: From the start of treatment until death or until 5 years after the time of disease progression

Interventionyears (Median)
Treatment ArmNA

[back to top] [back to top]

Systemic Clearance (CL) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1

Systemic CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body. The total systemic clearance after intravenous dose was estimated by dividing the total administered dose by the plasma AUC(0-infinity). (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

InterventionLiter per Hour (Mean)
Bortezomib4.68

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Tmax is the time when Cmax is observed, taken directly from the plasma concentration-time profile. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
Bortezomib0.08

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Steady state volume of distribution (Vss) is the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state which is estimated by (D/AUC[0-infinity])*(AUMC[0-infinity])/AUC[0-infinity]) where D is the dose of study drug, AUMC(0-infinity) is the area under the first moment curve extrapolated to infinity and AUC(0-infinity) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite time. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

InterventionLiter (Mean)
Bortezomib331.68

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinite Time (AUC[0-infinity]) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1

The AUC(0-infinity) is area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite time, calculated as the sum of AUC(last) and C(last)/lambda(z), in which C(last) is the last observed quantifiable concentration. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

InterventionHour*ng per ml (Mean)
Bortezomib349.62

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time at Last Observed Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1

The AUC(0-t) is area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration determined by the trapezoidal rule. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionHour*ng per ml (Mean)
Bortezomib51.86

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response to Treatment at Day 11 of Cycle 8

Response to treatment was based on the changes in monoclonal protein (M-protein) in serum and urine. Response categories were complete response: complete clearance of M-protein for at least 6 weeks, response: at least 75 percent reduction in M-protein for at least 2 determinations 6 weeks apart, partial response: 50 to 74 percent reduction in M-protein, minimal response: 25 to 49 percent reduction in M-protein, stable disease: not qualifying minimal response or progression and progression: increased M-protein level in serum or urine or clinical signs of disease progression. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Day 11 of Cycle 8

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ResponsePartial responseMinimal responseStable diseaseProgression
Bortezomib23216

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response to Treatment at Day 1 of Cycle 7

Response to treatment was based on the changes in monoclonal protein (M-protein) in serum and urine. Response categories were complete response: complete clearance of M-protein for at least 6 weeks, response: at least 75 percent reduction in M-protein for at least 2 determinations 6 weeks apart, partial response: 50 to 74 percent reduction in M-protein, minimal response: 25 to 49 percent reduction in M-protein, stable disease: not qualifying minimal response or progression and progression: increased M-protein level in serum or urine or clinical signs of disease progression. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 7

InterventionParticipants (Number)
ResponsePartial ResponseStable disease
Bortezomib131

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response to Treatment at Day 1 of Cycle 5

Response to treatment was based on the changes in monoclonal protein (M-protein) in serum and urine. Response categories were complete response: complete clearance of M-protein for at least 6 weeks, response: at least 75 percent reduction in M-protein for at least 2 determinations 6 weeks apart, partial response: 50 to 74 percent reduction in M-protein, minimal response: 25 to 49 percent reduction in M-protein, stable disease: not qualifying minimal response or progression and progression: increased M-protein level in serum or urine or clinical signs of disease progression. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 5

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Complete responseResponsePartial ResponseStable diseaseProgression
Bortezomib12211

[back to top]

Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 11 of Cycle 8

The KPS Index allows participants to be classified as per their functional impairment (abnormal function). This can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies (medicine or medical care given to a participant for a disease or condition) and to assess the prognosis (outlook, probable outcomes) in individual participants. KPS was recorded on an 11-point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100.) where '0=Dead' and '100=Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease'. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Day 11 of Cycle 8

InterventionParticipants (Number)
KPS Score = 50KPS Score = 60KPS Score = 70KPS Score = 80KPS Score = 90KPS Score = 100
Bortezomib241322

[back to top]

Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 1 of Cycle 7

The KPS Index allows participants to be classified as per their functional impairment (abnormal function). This can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies (medicine or medical care given to a participant for a disease or condition) and to assess the prognosis (outlook, probable outcomes) in individual participants. KPS was recorded on an 11-point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100.) where '0=Dead' and '100=Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease'. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 7

InterventionParticipants (Number)
KPS Score = 60KPS Score = 80KPS Score = 90KPS Score = 100
Bortezomib1211

[back to top]

Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 1 of Cycle 5

The KPS Index allows participants to be classified as per their functional impairment (abnormal function). This can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies (medicine or medical care given to a participant for a disease or condition) and to assess the prognosis (outlook, probable outcomes) in individual participants. KPS was recorded on an 11-point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100.) where '0=Dead' and '100=Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease'. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 5

InterventionParticipants (Number)
KPS Score = 60KPS Score = 70KPS Score = 80KPS Score = 100
Bortezomib1141

[back to top]

Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 1 of Cycle 3

The KPS Index allows participants to be classified as per their functional impairment (abnormal function). This can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies (medicine or medical care given to a participant for a disease or condition) and to assess the prognosis (outlook, probable outcomes) in individual participants. KPS was recorded on an 11-point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100.) where '0=Dead' and '100=Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease'. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 3

InterventionParticipants (Number)
KPS Score = 60KPS Score = 70KPS Score = 80KPS Score = 90KPS Score = 100
Bortezomib11622

[back to top]

Number of Participants With KPS Score at Day 1 of Cycle 1

The KPS Index allows participants to be classified as per their functional impairment (abnormal function). This can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies (medicine or medical care given to a participant for a disease or condition) and to assess the prognosis (outlook, probable outcomes) in individual participants. KPS was recorded on an 11-point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100.) where '0=Dead' and '100=Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease'. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionParticipants (Number)
KPS Score = 70KPS Score = 80KPS Score = 90KPS Score = 100
Bortezomib2552

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Score at Baseline

The KPS Index allows participants to be classified as per their functional impairment (abnormal function). This can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies (medicine or medical care given to a participant for a disease or condition) and to assess the prognosis (outlook, probable outcomes) in individual participants. KPS was recorded on an 11-point scale (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100.) where '0=Dead' and '100=Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease'. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Baseline

InterventionParticipants (Number)
KPS Score = 70KPS Score = 80KPS Score = 90KPS Score = 100
Bortezomib2372

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time at Last Observed Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1

The AUC(0-t) is area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the last quantifiable concentration determined by the trapezoidal rule. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

InterventionHour*ng per mL (Mean)
Bortezomib190.39

[back to top]

Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Steady state volume of distribution (Vss) is the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state which is estimated by (D/AUC[0-infinity])*(AUMC[0-infinity])/AUC[0-infinity]) where D is the dose of study drug, AUMC(0-infinity) is the area under the first moment curve extrapolated to infinity and AUC(0-infinity) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite time. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionLiter (Mean)
Bortezomib483.71

[back to top]

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1

Tmax is the time when Cmax is observed, taken directly from the plasma concentration-time profile. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
Bortezomib0.08

[back to top]

Elimination Half-Life Period (T1/2) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1

The T1/2 is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by 1 half to its original concentration. It is associated with the terminal rate-constant (lambda[z]) of the semi logarithmic drug concentration-time curve, and is calculated as 0.693/lambda(z). (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
Bortezomib0.08

[back to top]

Terminal Rate Constant (Lambda[z]) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1

Lambda(z) is defined as terminal rate-constant which reflect the speed of drug elimination in vivo (within the living), and is estimated by log-linear regression analysis of the terminal phase of the plasma concentration versus time curve for at least 3 points. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

InterventionPer Hour (Mean)
Bortezomib0.01

[back to top]

Terminal Rate Constant (Lambda[z]) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Lambda(z) is defined as terminal rate-constant which reflect the speed of drug elimination in vivo (within the living), and is estimated by log-linear regression analysis of the terminal phase of the plasma concentration versus time curve for at least 3 points. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionPer Hour (Mean)
Bortezomib0.08

[back to top]

Area Under First Moment Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUMC) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1

AUMC is defined as the area under first moment plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing up to definite time t, to infinity, or to the time of last measurable concentration determined by the following equation: AUMC(0 to infinity)=Cntn/k elimination(el) + Cn/k(el^2) summation[(tn - tn^-1) (Cn^-1) (tn^-1)] + Cntn/2 where Cn=last quantifiable concentration, tn=time at which Cn is measured, k=rate constant. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionHour square*ng per ml (Mean)
Bortezomib20678.41

[back to top]

Area Under First Moment Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUMC) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1

AUMC is defined as the area under first moment plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing up to definite time t, to infinity, or to the time of last measurable concentration determined by the following equation: AUMC(0 to infinity)=Cntn/k elimination(el) + Cn/k(el^2) summation[(tn - tn^-1) (Cn^-1) (tn^-1)] + Cntn/2 where Cn=last quantifiable concentration, tn=time at which Cn is measured, k=rate constant. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

InterventionHour square*ng per ml (Mean)
Bortezomib39414.06

[back to top]

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinite Time (AUC[0-infinity]) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1

The AUC(0-infinity) is area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite time, calculated as the sum of AUC(last) and C(last)/lambda(z), in which C(last) is the last observed quantifiable concentration. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionHour*ng per ml (Mean)
Bortezomib106.99

[back to top]

Elimination Half-Life Period (T1/2) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1

The T1/2 is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by 1 half to its original concentration. It is associated with the terminal rate-constant (lambda[z]) of the semi logarithmic drug concentration-time curve, and is calculated as 0.693/lambda(z). (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
Bortezomib51.55

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1

The Cmax is observed maximum plasma concentration, taken directly from the plasma concentration-time profile. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionNanogram per millileter (ng per ml) (Mean)
Bortezomib76.43

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Bortezomib on Day 11 of Cycle 1

The Cmax is observed maximum plasma concentration, taken directly from the plasma concentration-time profile. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

Interventionng per ml (Mean)
Bortezomib127.02

[back to top]

Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Bortezomib in the Body on Day 1 of Cycle 1

The MRT is the average time at which the number of absorbed molecules reside in the body, after single-dose administration, and calculated as AUMC(infinity)/AUC(infinity) where AUMC(infinity) is area under the plasma concentration-time first moment curve from time zero to infinite time and AUC(infinity) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite time. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionHour (Mean)
Bortezomib65.97

[back to top]

Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Bortezomib in the Body on Day 11 of Cycle 1

The MRT is the average time at which the number of absorbed molecules reside in the body, after single-dose administration, and calculated as AUMC(infinity)/AUC(infinity) where AUMC(infinity) is area under the plasma concentration-time first moment curve from time zero to infinite time and AUC(infinity) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite time. (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 11 of Cycle 1

InterventionHour (Mean)
Bortezomib88.74

[back to top]

Systemic Clearance (CL) of Bortezomib on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Systemic CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body. The total systemic clearance after intravenous dose was estimated by dividing the total administered dose by the plasma AUC(0-infinity). (NCT01801436)
Timeframe: 0 hour (Pre-dose) and 0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours (post-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1

InterventionLiter per Hour (Mean)
Bortezomib25.99

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"Complete response rate was defined as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who achieved a sCR or CR per the IMWG-URC as their best response.~sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM).~CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy." (NCT01818752)
Timeframe: Disease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone23.1
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone25.9

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

"Disease response was evaluated according to the IMWG-URC using a validated computer algorithm. Overall response was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR).~sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM).~CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein with urine M-protein <100 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline.~PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in urine M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline." (NCT01818752)
Timeframe: Disease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone78.8
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone84.3

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

"Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death (whatever the cause). Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up as of the data analysis cut-off date were censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive.~Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method." (NCT01818752)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for OS was 22.2 and 22.5 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNA
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy

"Neuropathy events were defined as Grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy as specified by peripheral neuropathy Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query, narrow (scope) (SMQN) terms.~Peripheral neuropathy was assessed by neurologic exam and graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03:~Grade 1: Asymptomatic; Grade 2: Moderate symptoms, limiting instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) Grade 3: Severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death." (NCT01818752)
Timeframe: From the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone35.1
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone2.5

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

"Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of documented disease progression or death due to any cause. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. The duration of PFS was censored for participants with no baseline and/or post-baseline disease assessments, who started a new anti-cancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, death or disease progression after missed disease assessment of 100 consecutive days or longer, or who were alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cutoff date, including lost to follow-up prior to disease progression.~Participants were evaluated for disease response and progression according to the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC), determined centrally using a validated computer algorithm in a blinded manner." (NCT01818752)
Timeframe: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for PFS was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone22.1
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone22.3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

"Adverse events (AEs)were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), version 4.03, where GRADE 1 = Mild; GRADE 2 = Moderate; GRADE 3 = Severe; GRADE 4 = Life-threatening; GRADE 5 = Fatal.~A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met 1 or more of the following criteria:~Death~Life-threatening~Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization~Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity~Congenital anomaly/birth defect~Important medical event that jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed above.~Treatment-related adverse events are adverse events considered related to at least 1 investigational product by the investigator, including those with unknown relationship." (NCT01818752)
Timeframe: From the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
All adverse eventsAEs ≥ grade 3Serious adverse eventsLeading to discontinuation of study drugFatal adverse eventsTreatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)TRAEs ≥ grade 3Treatment-related serious adverse eventsTRAE leading to discontinuation of study drugTreatment-related fatal adverse events
Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone4543581987320431285102515
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone46035423583314082681365410

[back to top]

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) Scores

"The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated self-rating questionnaire including 30 items used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients.~It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).~The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale was scored between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better Global Health Status/QOL." (NCT01818752)
Timeframe: Baseline, weeks 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline (n = 425, 425)Week 6 (n = 412, 407)Week 12 (n = 376, 389)Week 18 (n = 341, 369)Week 24 (n = 320, 345)Week 30 (n = 298, 317)Week 36 (n = 285, 308)Week 42 (n = 275, 288)Week 48 (n = 261, 265)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone53.356.255.355.757.361.661.963.362.9
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone53.961.162.463.263.363.064.065.065.1

[back to top]

Participants Evaluated for Toxicity

Before each drug dose, the patient will be evaluated for possible toxicities that may have occurred after the previous dose(s). Toxicities are to be assessed according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0,). (NCT01833143)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib17

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT01833143)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib13

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival

Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions (NCT01833143)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib1

[back to top] [back to top]

Mean Change in Quality-Of-Life Indicators Post-Transplant

Measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and Multiple Myeloma module (QLQ-MY20). The EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social) and global health status. The EORTC QLQ-MY20 includes disease symptoms and treatment side effects scales. Scores are averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale. For functional and global health status, a positive change from baseline (pre-DPACE) indicates improvement whereas for the symptom scales a negative change from baseline (pre-DPACE) indicates improvement. (NCT01849783)
Timeframe: Pre-DPACE, Pre-maintenance, every 6 months for up to 2 years during maintenance. Up to 6 years.

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Change in Physical Functioning at Pre-MaintenanceChange in Physical Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 6Change in Physical Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 12Change in Physical Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 18Change in Physical Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 24Change in Role Functioning at Pre-MaintenanceChange in Role Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 6Change in Role Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 12Change in Role Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 18Change in Role Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 24Change in Emotional Functioning at Pre-MaintenanceChange in Emotional Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 6Change in Emotional Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 12Change in Emotional Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 18Change in Emotional Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 24Change in Cognitive Functioning at Pre-MaintenanceChange in Cognitive Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 6Change in Cognitive Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 12Change in Cognitive Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 18Change in Cognitive Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 24Change in Social Functioning at Pre-MaintenanceChange in Social Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 6Change in Social Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 12Change in Social Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 18Change in Social Functioning at Maintenance Cycle 24Change in Global Health Status at Pre-MaintenanceChange in Global Health Status at Maintenance Cycle 6Change in Global Health Status at Maintenance Cycle 12Change in Global Health Status at Maintenance Cycle 18Change in Global Health Status at Maintenance Cycle 24Change in Distress Symptoms at Pre-MaintenanceChange in Distress Symptoms at Maintenance Cycle 6Change in Distress Symptoms at Maintenance Cycle 12Change in Distress Symptoms at Maintenance Cycle 18Change in Distress Symptoms at Maintenance Cycle 24Change in Side Effects of Treatment at Pre-MaintenanceChange in Side Effects of Treatment at Maintenance Cycle 6Change in Side Effects of Treatment at Maintenance Cycle 12Change in Side Effects of Treatment at Maintenance Cycle 18Change in Side Effects of Treatment at Maintenance Cycle 24
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant1.3-0.61.15.44.67.48.74.47.06.08.75.51.45.88.30.4-4.6-5.1-6.0-3.6-1.02.7-4.90.8-1.55.40.2-3.1-0.13.46.25.95.73.85.3-3.3-0.7-5.1-2.4-2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Able to Complete Full Course Therapy

Percentage of participants able to complete the full course of therapy. (NCT01849783)
Timeframe: Up to 6 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant24

[back to top]

Median Progression Free Survival (mPFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the start of DPACE to the date of first documentation of disease progression as assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group response criteria or death due to any cause. Progression is defined using the International Myeloma Working Group response criteria, an increase of greater than or equal to 25% from the lower response value. (NCT01849783)
Timeframe: From the start of DPACE for all participants who have had at least one day of protocol treatment. Up to 6 years.

Interventionmonths (Median)
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant76.4

[back to top]

GVHD

"aGVHD onset at a certain grade will be used to calculate the cumulative incidence for that grade (e.g., onset of grade 70 post-transplant , time to grade III is 70 days). This end point will be evaluated through day 150 post-transplant. The diagnosis of aGVHD is based on clinical and pathological evaluation by the treating physician.~The first day of cGVHD will be used to calculate the cumulative incidence of cGVHD. The diagnosis of cGVHD is based on clinical and pathological evaluation by the treating physician." (NCT01860170)
Timeframe: Assessed routinely by clinical and pathological evaluation. Acute GVHD will be assessed up to day 150 post-transplant. Chronic GVHD will be assess up to 2 years post-transplant.

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Acute GvHD Grade II-IVAcute GvHD Grade III-IVChronic GvHD
Cohort 1-Bortezomib (Velcade®)001
Cohort 2-Bortezomib (Velcade®)001
Cohort 3-Bortezomib (Velcade®)1035

[back to top]

Dose Limiting Toxicity

Grade 3 non-hematologic Common Toxicity Criteria toxicity directly related to bortezomib (such as peripheral neuropathy) or Grade 2 or > hepatic bilirubin Common Toxicity Criteria Graft failure (NCT01860170)
Timeframe: Assessed daily (while inpatient) through clinical and laboratory examination up to 90 days.

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Cohort 1-Bortezomib (Velcade®)0
Cohort 2-Bortezomib (Velcade®)0
Cohort 3-Bortezomib (Velcade®)0

[back to top]

Engraftment

"Neutrophil engraftment is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 0.5 109/L for 3 consecutive measurements on different days. The first of the 3 days will be considered the day of neutrophil engraftment.~Platelet engraftment is defined as platelet count > 20 109/L for 3 consecutive measurements over at least 3 days. The first of the 3 days will be considered the day of platelet engraftment.~In this study, graft failure is defined as lack of achieving neutrophil engraftment by day 22 and donor chimerism > 50% by day 45." (NCT01860170)
Timeframe: Assessed daily by laboratory evaluation until engraftment or up to 90 days.

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Neutrophil EngraftmentPlatelet EngraftmentGraft Failure
Cohort 1-Bortezomib (Velcade®)330
Cohort 2-Bortezomib (Velcade®)310
Cohort 3-Bortezomib (Velcade®)22220

[back to top]

Overall Response (OR)

Primary outcome is overall response (OR) including hematologic improvement defined by International Working Group (IWG), complete remission, partial remission and marrow complete remission. (NCT01891968)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bortezomib3

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Response

"For Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia- At least 3 of 5 criteria should be met.~Stabilization of hemoglobin without transfusions by 2 weeks~Conversion of DAT from + to - by 6 weeks~Normalization of serum haptoglobin levels by 6 weeks~Normalization of indirect bilirubin levels by 6 weeks~Reduction in the frequency of transfusions by 50% by 4 weeks~For Autoimmune Neutropenia- At least 2 of 3 criteria should be met.~Stabilization of absolute neutrophil count by 2 weeks~Undetectable antineutrophil antibodies by 6 weeks~Reduction in GCSF dose by 50% by 6 weeks~For Autoimmune Thrombocytopenia- At least 2 of 3 criteria should be met.~Stabilization of platelet count without platelet transfusions by 2 weeks~Undetectable antiplatelet antibodies by 6 weeks~Reduction in the frequency of platelet transfusions by 50% from pre-bortezomib values by 6 weeks" (NCT01929980)
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Neutropenia (n=3)Thrombocytopenia (n=2)Hemolytic Anemia (n=1)
Bortezomib321

[back to top]

>= 2 Fold Increase in Circulating PBSC's

Participants with >= 2 fold increase in circulating PBSC's in blood and in apheresis collections in up to 4-days collection (NCT02037256)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DoublingLess than doubling
Group A: Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m203
Group B Bortezomib 1/3 mg/m2413

[back to top]

Time to Neutrophil Engraftment

Estimated Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment, ANC 500 (NCT02037256)
Timeframe: Up to 6 months

Interventiondays to ANC 500 (Median)
Arm A Standard of Care Mobilization12
Arm B Alternative Mobilization13

[back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival Rates

Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death (regardless of the reason), whichever comes first (NCT02100657)
Timeframe: From the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death, up to 4 years

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Mean)
At 3 monthsAt 6 monthsAt 12 months
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)85.771.435.7
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)100.066.766.7
Plitidepsin (5 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)44.426.713.3

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate (ORR), including stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) and partial response (PR) according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria (NCT02100657)
Timeframe: Response or disease progression was assessed on Day 1 of each cycle, assessed up to 4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Mean)
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)57.1
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)66.7
Plitidepsin (5 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)22.2

[back to top]

Event-free Survival Rates

Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated from the date of first infusion to the date of documented PD or death, but could include additional events besides death and PD that were considered of importance (NCT02100657)
Timeframe: from the date of first infusion to the date of documented PD or death, up to 4 years

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Mean)
At 3 monthsAt 6 monthsAt 12 months
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)85.771.435.7
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)100.066.766.7
Plitidepsin (5 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)44.426.713.3

[back to top]

Time to Progression

Time to progression (TTP) was calculated from the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death due to PD. (NCT02100657)
Timeframe: From the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death due to PD, up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)10.4
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)13.6
Plitidepsin (5 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)2.8

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

"DLTs were defined as:~Hematological Toxicity~Grade 3/4 neutropenia associated with fever or lasting>7 days related to the study treatment~Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia accompanied by grade 3/4 hemorrhage~Extensive bone marrow (BM) infiltration, DLT was defined as grade 4 thrombocytopenia with grade 3/4 hemorrhage or grade 4 neutropenia lasting >7 days or with fever Non-hematological Toxicity~Grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting refractory to antiemetic therapy~Grade≥3 muscular Adverse events (AE) (myalgia, muscular weakness, muscle cramps, myopathy)~Grade≥3 alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) lasting more than 1 week~Grade≥3 bilirubin increase~Grade≥3 creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increase~Cardiac toxicity~Symptomatic or treatment-requiring grade ≥1 cardiac arrhythmia related to plitidepsin~Grade≥1 left ventricular systolic dysfunction related to plitidepsin~Neuropathic pain and peripheral sensory neuropathy related to BTZ" (NCT02100657)
Timeframe: After 28-day cycle

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)0
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)0
Plitidepsin (5 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)2

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated from the date of first infusion to the date of documented PD or death, but could include additional events besides death and PD that were considered of importance (NCT02100657)
Timeframe: From the date of first infusion to the date of documented PD or death, up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)10.4
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)13.6
Plitidepsin (5 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)2.8

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response (DR) was analyzed for all patients in whom a response had been observed and was calculated from the date of the first documentation of response to the date of PD or further therapy or death (NCT02100657)
Timeframe: From the date of the first documentation of response to the date of PD or further therapy or death, up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)21.0
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)12.6
Plitidepsin (5 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)12.3

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death (regardless of the reason), whichever comes first (NCT02100657)
Timeframe: from the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death, up to 4 years

Interventionmonths (Mean)
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)10.4
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)13.6
Plitidepsin (5 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)2.8

[back to top]

Time to Progression Rates

Time to progression (TTP) was calculated from the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death due to PD. (NCT02100657)
Timeframe: From the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death due to PD, up to 4 years

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Mean)
At 3 monthsAt 6 monthsAt 12 months
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)85.771.435.7
Plitidepsin (4 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)100.066.766.7
Plitidepsin (5 mg/m2)+BTZ (1.3 mg/m2)+DXM (40 mg)44.426.713.3

[back to top]

Event-free Survival (EFS) for Modified Augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Backbone With or Without Bortezomib in All Randomized Patients

EFS is calculated as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. Three-year EFS rates will be calculated for both groups. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Arm A (Combination Chemotherapy)81.7
Arm B (Combination Chemotherapy, Bortezomib)85.1

[back to top]

EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-LLy Patients Treated With HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Have Complete or Partial Remission and Those Who do Not Respond

EFS for very high risk (VHR) T-LLy patients treated with HR Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) intensification blocks who have complete or partial remission and those who do not respond (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VHR T-LLy (CR/PR)0

[back to top]

EFS for Very High Risk (VHR) T-ALL Patients Treated With High Risk (HR) Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) Intensification Blocks Who Become Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative and Those Who Remain MRD Positive at the End of HR Block 3

EFS will be calculated as time from the end of the three high-risk blocks of therapy to first event (relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
VHR T-ALL MRD Undetectable25.0
VHR T-ALL MRD Detectable88.9

[back to top]

EFS for Standard (SR) and Intermediate Risk (IR) T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no Cranial Radiation Therapy [CRT]) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Received CRT)

EFS is calculated as time from randomization at study entry to first event (induction failure, induction death, relapse, second malignancy, remission death) or date of last contact. (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
AALL1231 T-ALL Patients88.3
AALL0434 T-ALL Patients88.8

[back to top]

Toxicity Rates Associated With Modified Standard Therapy, Including Dexamethasone and Additional Pegaspargase

Percentage of patients who experienced Grade 3 or higher Toxicity Assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years from start of therapy by patient

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Total Patients78.0

[back to top]

Cumulative Incidence Rates of Isolated Central Nervous System (CNS) Relapse for SR and IR T-ALL Patients on the Non-bortezomib Containing Arm on This Study (no CRT) and Similar Patients on AALL0434 (Receive CRT)

Cumulative incidence of isolated CNS relapse adjusting for competing risks using the method of: Gray R, A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1141:1154, 1988 (NCT02112916)
Timeframe: 3 years

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Isolated CNS RelapseIsolated Bone Marrow RelapseCombined Bone Marrow Relapse
AALL0434 T-ALL Patients2.23.01.8
AALL1231 T-ALL Patients3.61.41.3

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as duration from date of randomization to either progressive disease (PD)/death, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as meeting any one of following criteria: Increase of greater than equal to (>=)25 percent (%) in level of serum M-protein from lowest response value and absolute increase must be >=0.5 gram per deciliter (g/dL); Increase of >=25% in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion (urine M-protein) from lowest response value and absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hours; Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: increase of >=25% in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels from lowest response value and absolute increase must be >10 mg/dL; Definite increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder. (NCT02136134)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to either progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first (approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone (Vd)7.16
Daratumumab + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (DVd)NA

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as time from date of randomization to date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PD). PD was defined as meeting any one of following criteria: Increase of >=25% in level of serum M-protein from lowest response value and absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL; Increase of >=25% in 24-hour urinary light chain excretion (urine M-protein) from lowest response value and absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24hours; Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: increase of >=25% in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels from lowest response value and absolute increase must be >10 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); Definite increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to Plasma Cell (PC) proliferative disorder. (NCT02136134)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progression or death due to PD whichever occurs first (approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone (Vd)7.29
Daratumumab + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (DVd)NA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, during the study or during follow up. IMWG criteria for PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 hours, if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of >=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria, in addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT02136134)
Timeframe: Up to disease progression (approximately of 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone (Vd)63.2
Daratumumab + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (DVd)82.9

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death. (NCT02136134)
Timeframe: Up to the end of the study (approximately of 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone (Vd)NA
Daratumumab + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (DVd)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With a Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better

Response rate of VGPR or better was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved VGPR and CR (including sCR) according to the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment. IMWG criteria for VGPR: Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein <100 mg/24 hours, if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of >90% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria, in addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required; CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% PCs in bone marrow; sCR: CR and normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2 to 4 color flow cytometry. (NCT02136134)
Timeframe: Up to disease progression (approximately of 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone (Vd)29.1
Daratumumab + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (DVd)59.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

The Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had negative MRD assessment at any timepoint after the first dose of study drugs by evaluation of bone marrow aspirates or whole blood. MRD was assessed in participants who achieved complete response or stringent complete response (CR/sCR). IMWG criteria for CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% PCs in bone marrow; sCR: CR plus normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2 to 4 color flow cytometry. (NCT02136134)
Timeframe: Up to disease progression (approximately of 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Bortezomib + Dexamethasone (Vd)2.8
Daratumumab + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (DVd)13.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best M-protein Response

Percentage of participants with Best M- protein response of 100% reduction and >=90% to < 100% reduction were assessed. Best M-protein response was defined as the maximal percent reduction or the lowest percent increase from baseline in serum M-protein for participants with measurable heavy chain at baseline or urine M-protein for participants without measurable heavy chain, but with measurable light chain disease at baseline. For participants without measurable heavy chain and light chain disease at baseline, best response in serum free light chain (FLC) was defined as the maximal percent reduction or the lowest percent increase from baseline in the difference between involved and uninvolved serum FLC level (dFLC). (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: Approximately up to 2.4 years

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Best M-protein response in serum: 100% reductionBest M-protein response in serum:>= 90 to < 100%Best M-protein response in urine:100% reductionBest M-protein response in urine:>=90 to < 100%Best response in dFLC:100% reductionBest response in dFLC: >=90% to < 100% reduction
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)58.515.290.57.10100.0
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)38.714.669.413.9077.8

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is designed to rate the participant's current health state on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health state and 100 represents the best imaginable health state. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 18
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)57.909.2810.8312.5010.7912.04
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)60.334.207.409.8910.807.65

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score

EQ-5D-5L is a standardized, participant-rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. The EQ-5D-5L includes 2 components: the EQ-5D-5L health state profile (descriptive system) and the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. The participant was asked to indicate his/her current health state by selecting the most appropriate level in each of the 5 dimensions. Responses to the 5 dimension scores were combined and converted into a single preference-weighted health utility index score 0 (0.0- worst health state) to 1 (1.0- better health state) representing the general health status of the individual based on the UK scoring algorithm. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
BaselineMonth 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 18
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)0.570.120.130.160.170.13
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)0.590.090.120.160.150.13

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30: Emotional Functioning Score

"The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30 items self-reporting questionnaire, with a 1 week recall period, resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 Global Health Status (GHS) scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The questionnaire includes 28 items with 4-point Likert type responses from 1-not at all to 4-very much to assess functioning and symptoms; 2 items with 7-point Likert scales (1= poor and 7= excellent) for global health and overall QoL. Scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores representing better GHS, better functioning, and more symptoms. Negative change from baseline values indicate deterioration in quality of life or functioning and positive values indicate improvement." (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 12Month 18
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)8.810.611.112.611.4
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)9.410.511.91112.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the number of days the date of randomization to date of death. Median Overall Survival was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: From randomization to death (up to approximately 2.4 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)NA
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Better

CR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or better (i.e. CR and sCR) as per IMWG criteria. CR: as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and less than (<) 5 percent plasma cells in bone marrow; sCR: CR plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: From randomization to disease progression (up to 2.4 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)24.4
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)42.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

The Minimal Residual Disease negativity rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had negative MRD (detection of less than 1 malignant cell among 100,000 normal cells) assessment at any timepoint after the first dose of study drugs by evaluation of bone marrow aspirates or whole blood at 10^-5 threshold. MRD was evaluated by using Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing of immunoglobulin genes. MRD was assessed in participants who achieved complete response or stringent complete response (CR/sCR). (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: From randomization to disease progression (up to 2.4 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)6.2
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)22.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)

sCR as per IMWG criteria is CR plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry. CR: Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine; Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas; <5% plasma cells (PCs) in bone marrow. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: From randomization to disease progression (up to 2.4 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)9.3
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)20.3

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

The Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a partial response (PR) or better, according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, during the study or during follow up. IMWG criteria for PR: greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percentage(%) reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 hours, if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of >=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria, If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells (PCs) is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was >=30%, in addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: From randomization to disease progression (up to 2.4 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)73.9
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)90.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better

VGPR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved VGPR or complete response (CR) (including stringent complete response[sCR]) according to the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment. VGPR: Serum and urine component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level less than (<) 100 milligram (mg) per 24 hour; CR: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasms cells (PCs) in bone marrow; sCR: CR in addition to having a normal FLC ratio and an absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, 2-4 color flow cytometry. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: From randomization to disease progression (up to 2.4 years)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)49.7
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)71.1

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS- duration from date of randomization to Progressive disease (PD)/death, whichever occurs first. PD per IMWG criteria-Increase of 25% from lowest response value in one of following: Serum and urine M-component (absolute increase >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dL] and >=200 milligram [mg]/24 hours respectively); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase>10 mg/dL); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels,without measurable disease by FLC levels,bone marrow Plasma cells (PC) %(absolute % >=10%);Bone marrow PC%: absolute% >10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: From randomization to either disease progression or death whichever occurs first (up to 2.4 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)18.14
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)NA

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Disease Progression (TTP)

TTP: Time from date of randomization to date of first documented evidence of PD or death due to PD, whichever occurs first. PD per IMWG criteria- Increase of 25 % from lowest response value in one of following: Serum and urine M-component (absolute increase >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dL] and >=200 mg/24 hours respectively); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase >10 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL]); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow plasma cells (PC)% (absolute % >=10%); Bone marrow PC %: absolute % >10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: From randomization to either disease progression or death due to PD whichever occurs first (up to 2.4 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)19.35
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)NA

[back to top] [back to top]

Time to Response

Time to response, defined as the time between the date of randomization and the first efficacy evaluation that the participant has met all criteria for PR or better. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 hours; If the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of >=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria; If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, >=50% reduction in bone marrow PCs is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was >=30%. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: From randomization to first documented PR or better (up to 2.4 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)0.82
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)0.79

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR: participants with a confirmed response (PR or better) as time between first documentation of response and disease progression, IMWG response criteria, or death due to PD, whichever occurs first. PD: Increase of 25% from lowest response value in any one of following: Serum M-component (absolute increase>=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component (absolute increase>=200 mg/24 hours); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase >10 mg/dL); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow PC%(absolute%>=10%); Bone marrow PC's %: absolute%>10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder. (NCT02195479)
Timeframe: Up to 2.4 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP)21.3
Daratumumab, Velcade, Melphalan and Prednisone (D-VMP)NA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery

Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a sustained platelet count >20,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusion in the preceding seven days. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Days 60 and 100 Post-transplant

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 60Day 100
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib9191
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc9292
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide9096

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS)

GRFS is defined as being free of grade III-IV acute GVHD onset, chronic GVHD onset requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib35.5
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc27.2
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide44.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With GVHD-free Survival

GVHD-free survival is defined as being alive without previous onset of Grade III-IV acute GVHD or chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppressive therapy. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib43
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc34
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide53

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD

"Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995:~Skin stage:~0: No rash~Rash <25% of body surface area~Rash on 25-50% of body surface area~Rash on > 50% of body surface area~Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation~Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*:~0: <2 mg/dL 1.2-3 mg/dL 2.3.01-6 mg/dL 3.6.01-15.0 mg/dL 4.>15 mg/dL~GI stage*:~0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day~Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD~Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day~Diarrhea >1500 mL/day~Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus * If multiple etiologies are listed for liver or GI, the organ system is downstaged by 1.~GVHD grade:~0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4" (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Day 180 Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib8
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc9
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD

"Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995:~Skin stage:~0: No rash~Rash <25% of body surface area~Rash on 25-50% of body surface area~Rash on > 50% of body surface area~Generalized erythroderma with bullous formation~Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*:~0: <2 mg/dL~2-3 mg/dL~3.01-6 mg/dL~6.01-15.0 mg/dL~>15 mg/dL~GI stage*:~0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day~Diarrhea 500-999 mL/day or persistent nausea with histologic evidence of GVHD~Diarrhea 1000-1499 mL/day~Diarrhea >1500 mL/day~Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus * If multiple etiologies are listed for liver or GI, the organ system is downstaged by 1.~GVHD grade:~0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4" (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Day 180 Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib26
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc32
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide27

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival

Disease-free survival is defined as being alive and free of disease relapse or progression. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib58
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc56
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide60

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse or Progression

Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia or MDS consistent with pretransplant features, or radiologic evidence of lymphoma. Progression of disease applies to patients with lymphoproliferative diseases (lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) not in remission prior to transplantation and is defined as increase in size of prior sites of disease or evidence of new sites of disease. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib24
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc31
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide28

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD Requiring Immunosupressive Therapy

Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. This endpoint considers the occurrence of chronic GVHD that necessitated initiation of immunosuppressive therapy for treatment. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib29
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc33
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide22

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD

Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib39
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc43
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide28

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery

Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 500/mm^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Days 28 and 100 Post-transplant

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Day 28Day 100
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib9496
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc9395
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide9598

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival

(NCT02208037)
Timeframe: 1 Year Post-transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib68
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc66
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide71

[back to top]

Donor Cell Engraftment

Donor cell engraftment will be assessed with donor/recipient chimerism. Chimerism may be evaluated in bone marrow, whole blood, or CD3 fractions. Full donor chimerism is defined as the presence of ≥ 95% of donor cells as a proportion of total cells. Mixed chimerism is defined as the presence of donor cells, as a proportion of total cells, of < 95% but > 5% in the bone marrow or peripheral blood. Full and mixed chimerism will be evidence of donor cell engraftment. Donor cells of ≤ 5% will be considered as graft rejection. (NCT02208037)
Timeframe: Days 28 and 100 Post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Day 2872130179Day 2872130181Day 2872130180Day 10072130180Day 10072130181Day 10072130179
Full ChimerismMixed ChimerismGraft RejectionDeadNo Assay Performed
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib58
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide64
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib11
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide8
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib1
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc1
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide2
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib2
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc4
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide0
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib17
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc21
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide18
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib63
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc56
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide62
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib14
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc17
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide13
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib5
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc3
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide3
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib4
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc10
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide5
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib3
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc6
Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide9

[back to top]

Count of Participants That Experience Overall Survival (OS)

The amount of participants that start treatment with BBd and survive at least one year post treatment completion. (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)2

[back to top]

Incidence of Grade 3-4 Adverse Events From the Combination of Bendamustine Hydrochloride, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Based on the Common Terminology Criteria Version 4.0

All adverse events are tracked during the course of the trial. Adverse events with a grade of 3-4 will be tracked and recorded. (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)22

[back to top]

Count of Participants That Experience Overall Response Following 4 Cycles of the Combination Regimen BBd

ORR (partial remission or better) to induction therapy following 4 cycles of the combination regimen BBd. (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: At least 140 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)13

[back to top]

Count of Participants That Experience Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The amount of participants that survive one year after treatment with BBd and do not experience worsening disease. (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)2

[back to top]

Count of Participants That Experience Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR)

Very good partial remission (VGPR) to induction therapy following 4 cycles of the combination regimen BBd. As defined as no dectable M-protein on SPEP (Serum protein electrophoresis) but positive IFX (Immunofixation) on serum or urine and >90% reduction of M-protein in serum and urine (NCT02224729)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Bendamustine, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone (Standard)9

[back to top]

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of LDE225 Plus Bortezomib

During the safety lead-in, a standard 3+3 dose escalation design was used to establish the MTD for LDE225 in combination with bortezomib. The MTD would be determined by the highest dose at which ≤1 of 6 patients experiences a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during one cycle (21 days) of therapy. If 2 of 6 patients within a dose level experienced a DLT, that dose level would be defined as exceeding MTD and no further dose escalation would occur. The previous dose level would be considered the MTD. (NCT02254551)
Timeframe: every 3 weeks up to 48 weeks

Intervention (Number)
LDE225 Plus BortezomibNA

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration for INCB052793

Tmax is the time to maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration. Summary of Steady-State, Day 15, was evaluated by dosing regimen. For PK analyses subjects in TGA and TGB are combined by dosage group because only 3 subjects were enrolled in each dose group in TGB and 4 subject for first dose in TGB 50 mg. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

Interventionhours (hr) (Median)
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 15 mg1.1
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 25 mg0.76
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 35 mg2.0
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 50 mg1.1
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 75 mg2.2
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 100 mg2.0
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg1.0
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 25 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21.1
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21.1
Phase 2 Cohort I - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^20.51

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Itacitinib

Cmax is defined as the maximum observed plasma concentration measured at steady state (Day 15). (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

InterventionnM (Mean)
Phase 2 Cohort J - Itacitinib 300 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^21310

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for INCB052793

Cmax is defined as the maximum observed plasma concentration measured at steady state (Day 15). For PK analyses subjects in TGA and TGB are combined by dosage group because only 3 subjects were enrolled in each dose group in TGB and 4 subject for first dose in TGB 50 mg. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

InterventionnM (Mean)
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 15 mg522
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 25 mg1110
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 35 mg1120
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 50 mg2050
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 75 mg1840
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 100 mg2890
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg928
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 25 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21270
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21480
Phase 2 Cohort I - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21610

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: AUC0-τ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over Dosing Interval for Itacitinib

AUC0-τ is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the last measurable concentration at time = t measured at steady state (Day 15). (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

InterventionnM*hr (Mean)
Phase 2 Cohort J - Itacitinib 300 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^29870

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: AUC0-τ: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over Dosing Interval for INCB052793

AUC0-τ is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time = 0 to the last measurable concentration at time = t measured at steady state (Day 15). For PK analyses subjects in TGA and TGB are combined by dosage group because only 3 subjects were enrolled in each dose group in TGB and 4 subject for first dose in TGB 50 mg. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

InterventionnM*hr (Mean)
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 15 mg4750
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 25 mg9170
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 35 mg8430
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 50 mg14700
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 75 mg18300
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 100 mg27800
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg6390
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 25 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^29580
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^210200
Phase 2 Cohort I - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^29380

[back to top]

Phase 1A and 1B: Percentage of Participants With Response as Determined by Investigator's Assessment

Response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved best overall response (BOR) as determined by IWG response criteria of investigator's assessment. A participant was considered an objective responder based on the following- Solid tumors: participant had a best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR, Lymphoma: participant had a BOR of complete radiologic response/complete metabolic response or partial remission/partial metabolic response, AML: participant had a BOR of CR, CRi, morphological leukemia-free state (MLFS), or PR, MDS: participant had a BOR of CR, PR, or marrow CR, MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN): participant had a BOR of CR, PR, or marrow response, MM: participant had a BOR of stringent CR, CR, very good PR, PR, or MR. Subjects are combined by tumor type for this analysis. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Baseline through end of study (Up to approximately 4.5 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 in Solid Tumors0
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 in Lymphoma0
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 in MDS/MPN1
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 in MM0
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 + Dexamethasone in MM2
Phase 1b Cohort F-INCB052793 +Azacytidine in AML4
Phase 1b Cohort F-INCB052793 +Azacytidine in MDS3
Phase 1b Cohort F-INCB052793 +Azacytidine in MDS/MPN2

[back to top]

Phase 1a and 1b: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last dose of study drug. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 3.4 years)

,,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESAE
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 100 mg62
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 15 mg30
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 25 mg31
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 35 mg60
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 50 mg42
Phase 1a TGA - INCB052793 75 mg33
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 25 mg31
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 35 mg42
Phase 1a TGB - INCB052793 50 mg42
Phase 1b Cohort B - INCB052793 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg75
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 25 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^254
Phase 1b Cohort F - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^21614

[back to top]

Phase 2: Number of Participants With at Least One TEAE and SAE

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization. A TEAE was defined as any AE either reported for the first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first dose of study drug and within 30 days of the last dose of study drug. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 1.3 years)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAESAE
Phase 2 Cohort I - INCB052793 35 mg + Azacytidine 75 mg/m^297
Phase 2 Cohort J - Itacitinib 300 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^2108

[back to top]

Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Hematological Malignancies

ORR is defined as the proportion of participants who achieved complete response (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), partial response (PR), or hematologic improvement (HI), using the IWG response criteria. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Baseline through end of study (Up to approximately 4.5 years)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 2 Cohort I-INCB052793 +Azacytidine (AML)0
Phase 2 Cohort I-INCB052793 +Azacytidine (MDS)1
Phase 2 Cohort J-Itacitinib +Azacitidine (AML)1
Phase 2 Cohort J-Itacitinib +Azacitidine (MDS)0

[back to top]

Phase 1a, 1b, and Phase 2: Tmax: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration for Itacitinib

Tmax is the time to maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration. (NCT02265510)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15: predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 hours postdose in Phase 1a; 0 (predose), 0.08, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours postdose in Phase 1b and Phase 2

Interventionhr (Median)
Phase 2 Cohort J - Itacitinib 300 mg + Azacitidine 75 mg/m^23.5

[back to top]

Minimal Response Rate (MRR) Per Investigator

MRR is based on modified EBMT criteria per investigator assessment (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: after 24 weeks (8 cycles; cycle = 21 days)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone9.7

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as time from first dose of study treatment to death (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: up to 30 days after end of study, approx. 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
LBH589 + Bortezomib + DexamethasoneNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the proportion of participants with CR, nCR or partial response (PR) based on modified EBMT criteria per investigator assessment (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: 24 weeks (8 cycles; cycle = 21 days)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone80.6

[back to top]

Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: Lambda_z

Lambda_z: The terminal elimination rate constant (h-1) (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h 8h, 24h 48h post dose

Intervention1/hour (1/h) (Geometric Mean)
PAN: C1D1PAN: C1D8
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone0.05060.0421

[back to top]

Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: T1/2

T1/2: The elimination half-life associated with the terminal slope (Lambda_z) of a semi logarithmic concentration-time curve (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h 8h, 24h 48h post dose

Interventionhour (h) (Geometric Mean)
PAN: C1D1PAN: C1D8
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone13.716.5

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR) Per Investigator

TTR is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to first documented response (PR or nCR or CR) per modified EBMT criteria as assessed by investigator (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: duration of study up to approx. 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone1.4

[back to top]

Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: Vz/F

Vz/F: The apparent volume of distribution during terminal phase (associated with Lambda_z) (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h 8h, 24h 48h post dose

InterventionLitre (L) (Geometric Mean)
PAN: C1D1PAN: C1D8
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone33902720

[back to top]

Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by FACT/GOG-Ntx Total Score

QoL as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/ Gynecology Oncology Group Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX) scale calculated scores and changes from baseline were summarized by visit. The FACT/GOG-Ntx is a measure to assess neurotoxicity from systemic chemotherapy. The recall period for this measure is the past 7 days. FACT/GOG-Ntx Total Score: 0 - 152 (28 + 28 + 24 + 28 + 44 = 152). (FACT-G Physical Well-Being Score: 0 - 28, FACT-G Social/Family Well-Being Score: 0 - 28, FACT-G Emotional Well-Being Score: 0 - 24, FACT-G Functional Well-Being Score: 0 - 28, FACT/GOG-Ntx Neurotoxicity Subscale Score: 0 - 44). 4. The scales are combined. The higher the score, the better the QOL. (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, and 156

Interventionscores on a scale (Median)
BaselineWeek 12Week 24Week 36Week 48Week 60Week 72Week 84Week 96Week 108Week 120Week 132Week 156
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone112.3391.75100.33125.83114.25109.92108.00101.00121.67120.17125.25114.00119.8

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Near Complete Response (nCR)/ Complete Response (CR) Rate

nCR plus CR rate after 8 cycles of therapy as defined by the modified European Society for Bone and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria per investigator assessment as the proportion of participants with nCR or CR as their best overall response. (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: after 24 weeks (8 cycles; cycle = 21 days)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone48.4

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as time from first dose of study treatment to progression or death due to any cause, based on modified European Society for Bone and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria per Investigator's assessment (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: duration of study up to approx. 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone15.3

[back to top]

Time to Progression/Relapse (TTP) Per Investigator

TTP is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression or relapse (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: duration of study up to approx. 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone15.3

[back to top]

Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: AUClast, AUC0-24h, AUC0-48h, AUCinf

PK sample collection was performed in subjects who agreed to blood samplings for the PK assessments of PAN and BTZ. The order of administration of the 3 study treatment components was 1) PAN, 2) Dex, and 3) BTZ. (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h 8h, 24h, 48h post dose

Interventionh.ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
PAN: AUClast C1D1PAN: AUClast C1D8BJB432: AUClast C1D1BJB432: AUClast C1D8PAN: AUC0-24h C1D1PAN: AUC0-24h C1D8BJB432: AUC0-24h C1D1BJB432: AUC0-24h C1D8PAN: AUC0-48h C1D1PAN: AUC0-48h C1D8BJB432: AUC0-48h C1D1BJB432: AUC0-48h C1D8PAN: AUCinf C1D1PAN: AUCinf C1D8
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone10615637.816687.112518.583.810615636.8169116175

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR) Per Investigator

DOR is defined as the time from date of the first documented CR/nCR or PR to the date of the first documented progression or relapse or death due to MM (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: duration of study up to approx. 4 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone22.7

[back to top]

Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: Cmax

Cmax: The maximum (peak) observed plasma concentration. PK sample collection was performed in subjects who agreed to blood samplings for the PK assessments of PAN and BTZ. The order of administration of the 3 study treatment components was 1) PAN, 2) Dex, and 3) BTZ. (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h 8h, 24h, 48h post dose

Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
PAN: Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1)PAN: Cycle 1 Day 8 (C1D8)BJB432: C1D1BJB432: C1D8
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone11.518.21.064.38

[back to top]

Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: CL/F

CL/F: The apparent total body clearance of drug from the plasma (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h 8h, 24h 48h post dose

InterventionLitre/hour (L/h) (Geometric Mean)
PAN: C1D1PAN: C1D8
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone172114

[back to top]

Composite PharmacoKinetics (PK) of Panobinostat and Bortezomib: Tmax

Tmax: The time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration. PK sample collection was performed in subjects who agreed to blood samplings for the PK assessments of PAN and BTZ. The order of administration of the 3 study treatment components was 1) PAN, 2) Dex, and 3) BTZ. (NCT02290431)
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5h, 1h, 2h, 3h, 4h 8h, 24h, 48h post dose

Interventionhour (h) (Median)
PAN: C1D1PAN: C1D8BJB432: C1D1BJB432: C1D8
LBH589 + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone2.002.0024.024.0

[back to top]

Change of Lung Function Measured by Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Between Baseline and 24 Weeks

Forced vital capacity, or FVC, is the amount in liters of air that can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. It measures the effect that lung disease has on a person's ability to inhale and exhale. Higher values are better, and decreases over time can indicate disease progression. (NCT02370693)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionPercentage of change in FVC %predicted (Mean)
Bortezomib Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil0.51
Placebo Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil-0.69

[back to top]

Change of Skin Fibrosis Measured by the Rodnan Skin Score Between Baseline and 24 Weeks

The Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) is a measure of skin thickness that sums individual scores of skin thickness (0 - No Thickening, 1 - Mild Thickening, 2 - Moderate Thickening, 3 - Severe Thickening) measured at 17 body sites to reach a total score (Range: 0 to 51, higher value representing thicker skin). The Score is used as a surrogate for disease activity and severity, and a worsening score over time is associated with worse outcomes. (NCT02370693)
Timeframe: 24 weeks

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
Bortezomib Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil-3.00
Placebo Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil-0.33

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

To assess the safety and tolerability of bortezomib with mycophenolate mofetil assessed by the incidence of serious adverse events. (NCT02370693)
Timeframe: First dosing day to last study visit day: Mean duration 8 months.

InterventionNumber of Participants with Serious Adve (Mean)
Bortezomib Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil0.33
Placebo Plus Mycophenolate Mofetil0.25

[back to top]

Grade 3 and 4 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Rate

Grade 3 and 4 TEA rate was defined as the proportion of participants who experienced a grade 3 or 4 adverse event of any attribution based on NCI Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4 (CTCAEv4) on treatment. (NCT02375555)
Timeframe: The adverse event observation period defined as the time on treatment (+30d) is 278 weeks.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone0.70

[back to top]

4 Cycle Response Rate

Disease response was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a response of partial response or better using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria. Partial Response (PR) defined as 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200mg/24h; Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h; Complete Response (CR) defined as negative immunofixation on serum and urine and, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and, <5% plasma cells in BM; Stringent Complete Response (sCR) defined as normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal cells in BM by immunohistochemistry or 2-4 color flow cytometry. The Clopper and Pearson method was used to estimate the 95% CIs for the response rate at Week 12. (NCT02375555)
Timeframe: Participants were followed up to 12 weeks.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone0.971

[back to top]

4 Cycle Ever Dose Modification (DM) Rate

The 4 cycle ever DM rate is the proportion of participants who started therapy and required dose modification of any study drug during the first four cycles of E-RVD. (NCT02375555)
Timeframe: Participants were followed up to 12 weeks.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone.40

[back to top]

Median Time to Response

Time to response is defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the first documentation of response partial response (PR) or better. Disease response was assessed using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria: Partial Response (PR) defined as 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200mg/24h; Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h; Complete Response (CR) defined as negative immunofixation on serum and urine and, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and, <5% plasma cells in BM; Stringent Complete Response (sCR) defined as normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal cells in BM by immunohistochemistry or 2-4 color flow cytometry. (NCT02375555)
Timeframe: Participants were followed up to 92 days.

Interventiondays (Median)
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone22.0

[back to top]

Successful Stem Cell Mobilization (SC Mob) Rate

Successful SC Mob defined as the proportion of participants with the ability to collect a total of at least 2*10^6 CD34+ cells/kg. (NCT02375555)
Timeframe: The most distant time of stem cell mobilization from time of registration is 21.4 weeks with a median of 15.14 weeks.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone0.968

[back to top]

Objective Response Rate (ORR) at End of 8 Cycles of Induction Therapy.

ORR was defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a disease response of partial response (PR) or better using IMWG response criteria. PR defined as 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200mg/24h; Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100mg/24h; Complete Response (CR) defined as negative immunofixation on serum and urine and, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and, <5% plasma cells in BM; Stringent Complete Response (sCR) defined as normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal cells in BM by immunohistochemistry or 2-4 color flow cytometry. (NCT02375555)
Timeframe: Participants were followed up to 24 weeks.

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
All Patients Treated With E-RVD.0.950

[back to top] [back to top]

Haematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms

(NCT02424851)
Timeframe: End of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy), 30 days after final treatment and 12 months after randomisation

,
InterventionEvents (Number)
Serious adverse eventsAdverse events
Arm A (BBD)23
Arm B (BTD)06

[back to top]

Quality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up

"The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a scale of 1 to 3: 1 (no problems), 2 (some problems), and 3 (extreme problems). Higher score equates to a worse outcome.~As stated in the official EQ-5D user guide, patient responses to the 5 questions were converted into a single index value as per Dolan P (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11):1095-108. These index values, with country specific value sets, facilitate the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) that are used to inform economic evaluations of health care interventions. In the UK, the values range from -0.594 to +1." (NCT02424851)
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 month follow up

,
InterventionUnits on a scale (Mean)
Baseline1 month FU
Arm A (BBD)0.720.69
Arm B (BTD)0.690.80

[back to top]

Renal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment

(NCT02424851)
Timeframe: End of 2nd treatment cycle, week 6

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Partial responseMinor responseNo repsonse
Arm A (BBD)294
Arm B (BTD)076

[back to top]

Overall Survival

(NCT02424851)
Timeframe: 1 month post end of treatment and 1 year post randomisation

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (BBD)9
Arm B (BTD)13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain

(NCT02424851)
Timeframe: End of week 6 (after receiving two cycles of therapy)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Arm A (BBD)13
Arm B (BTD)3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival

The primary endpoint compares progression-free survival as a time to event endpoint from randomization between patients randomized to ixazomib and placebo maintenance in high risk multiple myeloma. Participants are considered a failure of the primary endpoint if they die or suffer from disease progression or if they initiate non-protocol anti-myeloma therapy. Disease progression was evaluated using the International Uniform Response Criteria. Participants must meet one of the criteria for disease progression specified in the protocol. The time to this event is the time from randomization to progression, death, or initiation of non-protocol anti myeloma therapy whichever comes first. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate progression-free survival during the 2 year post-transplant follow-up period. Participants who were event-free at two years post-transplant are censored at that time. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 12 months and 21 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months Post-randomization21 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance65.355.3
Placebo72.759.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) is defined as freedom from death from any cause. OS post-randomization is estimated for each arm using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and compared between arms using the log rank test. Participants who are alive at two years post-transplant are censored at that time. Confidence intervals for values of 100% were not calculated and are shown as 100%. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 12 months and 21 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months Post-randomization21 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance100.094.7
Placebo90.986.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Infections Post-randomization by Time Point

All Grade 2 and 3 infections are reported according to the BMT CTN MOP (Manual of Procedures) where a higher grade corresponds to more severe symptoms. The cumulative incidence of severe, life-threatening, or fatal infections (Grade 3), treating death as a competing event, are estimated at 6, 12 and 18 months post randomization using Aalen-Johansen estimators for each treatment group. Comparison of cumulative incidence between the two treatment arms was done using a Z test at fixed time points. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 6, 12 and 18 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 Months Post-randomization12 Months Post-randomization18 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance4.84.84.8
Placebo0.00.00.2

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Infections Post-randomization by Infection Type

All Grade 2 and 3 infections are reported according to the BMT CTN MOP (Manual of Procedures) where a higher grade corresponds to more severe symptoms. The number of participants with post-randomization infections in each treatment arm is described by severity and type of infection. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 2 years post-randomization

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with InfectionsMaximum Severity: Grade 2Maximum Severity: Grade 3Participants with Bacterial InfectionParticipants with Viral InfectionParticipants with Fungal InfectionParticipants with Other Infection
Ixazomib Maintenance8623601
Placebo1110121110

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression

Disease progression was evaluated using the International Uniform Response Criteria. Participants in sCR/CR must meet at least one of the criteria for disease progression specified in the protocol for sCR/CR participants; those not in sCR/CR must meet at least one of the disease progression criteria specified in the protocol for those not in sCR/CR. The cumulative incidence of progression from randomization will be estimated for each treatment arm using the Aalen-Johansen estimator, with death in remission treated as a competing risk. Initiation of anti-myeloma therapy will be considered evidence of progression. Participants who were event-free at two years post-transplant are censored at that time. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 12 months and 21 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months Post-randomization21 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance34.744.7
Placebo27.336.4

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD

Cumulative incidences of chronic GVHD were determined using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Death prior to chronic GVHD is treated as the competing risk. Cumulative incidences are compared between treatment arms using Gray's test. Data of chronic GVHD were collected from providers and chart review according to the recommendations of the 2014 NIH Consensus Criteria. Eight organs are scored on a 0-3 scale to reflect degree of chronic GVHD involvement; 3 indicates the worst symptom. Liver and pulmonary function test results and use of systemic therapy for treatment of chronic GVHD are also recorded. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 12 months and 21 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
12 Months Post-randomization21 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance68.668.6
Placebo63.663.6

[back to top]

Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) - Short Form 36 (SF-36) Score

The MOS SF-36 instrument is a general assessment of health quality of life with eight components: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Pain Index, General Health Perceptions, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health Index. The scale is 0 to 100 where 0 is maximum disability and 100 is no disability, so the higher the score the more positive the outcome. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) were used as the outcome measures in summarizing the SF-36 data for this study. This self-reported questionnaire was completed at transplant, randomization, 6 months following the start of maintenance therapy (which corresponds to 6 months post-randomization), and 24 months post-transplant. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed prior to maintenance, 6 months post-randomization and at 24 months after transplant. Only English and Spanish speaking patients were eligible to participate in the quality of life component of this trial. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: Randomization, 6 months post-randomization, 24 months post-transplant

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
PCS: RandomizationPCS: 6 Months Post-randomizationPCS: 24 Months Post-transplantPCS: Change from Randomization to 6 Months Post-randomizationPCS: Change from Randomization to 24 Months Post-transplantMCS: RandomizationMCS: 6 Months Post-randomizationMCS: 24 Months Post-transplantMCS: Change from Randomization to 6 Months Post-randomizationMCS: Change from Randomization to 24 Months Post-transplant
Ixazomib Maintenance38.747.945.13.34.751.554.856.1-0.64.9
Placebo41.541.245.71.07.849.954.549.55.3-2.5

[back to top]

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) - Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Total Score

The FACT-BMT version 4.0 instrument is comprised of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), which evaluates the health-related quality of life (HQL) of patients receiving treatment for cancer, and the BMT Concerns module, that addresses disease and treatment-related questions specific to bone marrow transplant. This scale goes from 0 to 196 where higher scores indicate better functioning. The FACT-BMT Total, which has all items in the FACT-G and BMT modules, was used as the outcome measure. This self-reported questionnaire was completed at transplant, randomization, 6 months following the start of maintenance therapy (which corresponds to 6 months post-randomization), and 24 months post-transplant. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed prior to maintenance, 6 months post-randomization and at 24 months after transplant. Only English and Spanish speaking patients were eligible to participate in the quality of life component of this trial. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: Randomization, 6-months post-randomization, 24 months post-transplant

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Randomization6 Months Post-randomization24 Months Post-transplantChange from Randomization to 6 Months Post-randomizationChange from Randomization to 24 Months Post-transplant
Ixazomib Maintenance100.0121.4121.55.012.6
Placebo110.0114.0109.07.03.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Acute GVHD (Grades III-IV)

Cumulative incidences of grade III-IV acute GVHD were determined using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Death prior to acute GVHD is treated as the competing risk. Cumulative incidences are compared between treatment arms using Gray's test. Grading of acute GVHD was derived by consensus grading per BMT Clinical Trials Network (CTN) manual of procedures (MOP). The acute GVHD algorithm calculates the grade based on the organ (skin, GI and liver) stage and etiology/biopsy reported on the weekly GVHD form. Grade I aGVHD is defined as Skin stage of 1-2 and stage 0 for both GI and liver organs. Grade II aGVHD is stage 3 of skin, or stage 1 of GI, or stage 1 of liver. Grade III is stage 2-4 for GI, or stage 2-3 of liver. Grade IV is stage 4 of skin, or stage 4 of liver. Grade 4 is the worst outcome. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 100 days post-randomization

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib Maintenance9.5
Placebo0.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Toxicities Post-randomization by Time Point

Toxicities are graded using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0. Higher grades correspond to worse symptoms with the minimum grade being a 0 and the maximum grade being a 5. The cumulative incidence of Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was estimated at 6, 12 and 18 months post randomization using Aalen-Johansen estimators for each treatment group. Death from a cause other than toxicity was treated as a competing risk. Comparison of cumulative incidence between the two treatment arms was done using a Z test at fixed time points. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 6, 12 and 18 months post-randomization

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
6 Months Post-randomization12 Months Post-randomization18 Months Post-randomization
Ixazomib Maintenance57.161.961.9
Placebo63.668.272.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment

Response was assessed using the International Uniform Response Criteria. All disease classifications are relative to the patient's disease status prior to allogeneic transplant (i.e. study entry). Response to treatment after randomization (sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR) is summarized in each arm post-transplant at 18 months and 24 months post-transplant. These response data were summarized separately for patients in sCR/CR at the time of randomization vs. those who were not in sCR/CR at the time of randomization. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 18 months and 24 months post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Response to Treatment at 18 Months Post-transplant for Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676Response to Treatment at 18 Months Post-transplant for Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Response to Treatment at 18 Months Post-transplant for Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676Response to Treatment at 18 Months Post-transplant for Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Response to Treatment at 24 Months Post-transplant for Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676Response to Treatment at 24 Months Post-transplant for Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Response to Treatment at 24 Months Post-transplant for Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Response to Treatment at 24 Months Post-transplant for Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676
Stringent Complete Response (sCR)Complete Response (CR)Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)Not EvaluablePartial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Died Before Evaluation
Ixazomib Maintenance3
Placebo3
Placebo2
Placebo0
Ixazomib Maintenance2
Placebo4
Ixazomib Maintenance4
Placebo1
Placebo6
Ixazomib Maintenance0
Ixazomib Maintenance1
Ixazomib Maintenance5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Best Response to Treatment After Randomization

Response was assessed using the International Uniform Response Criteria. Best response is the best of all the disease response status at each assessment time point after randomization. The order from best to worst is: Stringent Complete Response (sCR), Complete Response (CR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), Partial Response (PR), Stable Disease (SD), and Progressive Disease (PD). All disease classifications are relative to the patient's disease status prior to allogeneic transplant (i.e. study entry). This outcome was compared between treatment groups using all response data up to 2 years post-transplant. These response data were summarized separately for patients in sCR/CR at the time of randomization vs. those who were not in sCR/CR at the time of randomization. Within each group (in sCR/CR vs not in sCR/CR at randomization), best response to treatment was compared between treatment groups using a Fisher's Exact test instead of a chi-square test because of the small sample size. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 2 years post-transplant

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676Participants in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551677Participants Not in sCR/CR at Randomization72551676
Partial Response (PR)Stable Disease (SD)Progressive Disease (PD)Stringent Complete Response (sCR)Complete Response (CR)Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
Ixazomib Maintenance6
Placebo5
Ixazomib Maintenance2
Ixazomib Maintenance0
Placebo0
Placebo1
Ixazomib Maintenance3
Placebo4
Placebo3
Ixazomib Maintenance4
Ixazomib Maintenance1

[back to top] [back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Toxicities Post-randomization by Toxicity Type

Toxicities are graded using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0. Higher grades correspond to worse symptoms with the minimum grade being a 0 and the maximum grade being a 5. Toxicities post-randomization are described for each treatment arm by the type of toxicity as well as peak overall grade. (NCT02440464)
Timeframe: 2 years post-randomization

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Maximum Toxicity Grade : 0 - 2Maximum Toxicity Grade : 3Maximum Toxicity Grade : 4Maximum Toxicity Grade : 5Abnormal Liver SymptomsDysgeusiaEncephalopathyGrade 3-5 Allergic ReactionGrade 3-5 AnaphylaxisGrade 3-5 Blood/Lymphatic ToxicityGrade 3-5 Cardiac ToxicityGrade 3-5 FatigueGrade 3-5 FeverGrade 3-5 GI ToxicityGrade 3-5 Hearing LossGrade 3-5 HemorrhageGrade 3-5 Hepatobiliary/PancreasGrade 3-5 HyperthyroidismGrade 3-5 HypothyroidismGrade 3-5 Metabolic ToxicityGrade 3-5 Musculoskeletal ToxicityGrade 3-5 Nervous System ToxicityGrade 3-5 Ocular ToxicityGrade 3-5 Renal ToxicityGrade 3-5 Respiratory ToxicityGrade 3-5 Skin/Subcutaneous Tissue ToxicityGrade 3-5 Vascular ToxicityHepatitisIntestinal ObstructionLiver FailureSevere Muscle Weakness/ParalysisSudden Vision LossTumor Lysis Syndrome
Ixazomib Maintenance8130031000563060010041400212010001
Placebo6141122010873070070163425853100100

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Peripheral Blood Monoclonal Protein Reduction or Stabilization

Efficacy will be assessed monthly during NKAE treatment (4 months) by peripheral blood monoclonal protein monitoring. During follow-up, efficacy will be evaluated monthly the first 6 months. After that, quarterly until one year of follow-up. (NCT02481934)
Timeframe: 16 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NKAE Cells Infusion + Chemotherapy5

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events During NKAE Treatment

Toxicity will be assessed by adverse events count during NKAE treatment monitoring peripheral blood absolute neutrophil count (cells/μl). Toxicity will be evaluated monthly during NKAE treatment (4 months). During follow-up, it will be assessed monthly the first 6 months. After that, quarterly until one year of follow-up, based on Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events of the National Cancer Institute (CTCAE) to v.4.03. (NCT02481934)
Timeframe: 16 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
NKAE Cells Infusion + Chemotherapy2

[back to top]

Overall Survival

duration of overall survival measured in days (NCT02489500)
Timeframe: 5 years

Interventiondays (Number)
Melphalan43
Melphalan + Bortezomib29

[back to top]

Toxicities

Number of serious adverse events per participant based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (NCT02489500)
Timeframe: 100 days

Interventionevents per participant (Mean)
Melphalan8.5
Melphalan + Bortezomib15

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Hematologic Response

Hematologic response defined as: at least 50% improvement in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (NCT02489500)
Timeframe: 6 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Melphalan0
Melphalan + Bortezomib0

[back to top]

2-year Overall Survival Seen With Using Bortezomib in Combination With the ALL R3 Re-induction Regimen in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory ALL or LL.

(NCT02535806)
Timeframe: 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Arm1

[back to top]

Post-induction Level of Minimal Residual Disease Seen With Using Bortezomib in Combination With the ALL R3 Re-induction Regimen in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory ALL or LL.

Percent of Cells Positive for Minimal residual disease measured by multiparameter flow cytometry (NCT02535806)
Timeframe: 36 days

InterventionPercentage of Cells Positive for MRD (Mean)
Treatment Arm0.65

[back to top]

Remission Rate Seen With Using Bortezomib in Combination With the ALL R3 Re-induction Regimen in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed or Refractory ALL or LL.

Number of patients with bone marrow blast percentage <5% after treatment (NCT02535806)
Timeframe: 36 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Arm2

[back to top]

Number of Subject With Adverse Events

Toxicities were assessed and graded according to CTCAE v 4.0. (NCT02535806)
Timeframe: 36 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Treatment Arm1

[back to top] [back to top]

Cluster of Differentiation 34 (CD34) Enumeration

Estimate the percentage of Cluster of Differentiation 34 (CD34) positive cells in circulating peripheral blood as a measure of mobilization on the days of collection. (NCT02703779)
Timeframe: Within the first 30 days after stem cell collection

Interventionpercentage of CD34 positive cells (Mean)
Stem Cell Collection Without In-vivo Purging With Bortezomib8.9
Stem Cell Collection With In-vivo Purging With Bortezomib7.8

[back to top]

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry - Cluster of Differentiation 34 (CD34)Assessment

Estimate the proportion of subjects who have a successful collection of stem cells (> 2 million Cluster of Differentiation 34 (CD34) cells/Kg of body weight) for autologous transplant in both treatment groups. (NCT02703779)
Timeframe: Within the first 30 days after stem cell collection

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stem Cell Collection Without In-vivo Purging With Bortezomib51
Stem Cell Collection With In-vivo Purging With Bortezomib50

[back to top]

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry - Minimum Residual Disease

Estimate the proportion of subjects with plasma cell contamination (defined as >0.01% and at least 100 cellular events) of harvested stem cell product by multi parametric flow cytometry (MFC) from patients with myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell collection 1) by standard of care mobilization using Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without Mozobil and 2) after two doses of bortezomib as in vivo purging plus standard of care using G-CSF with or without Mozobil. (NCT02703779)
Timeframe: Day 0 for all subjects (Day 0 is the day of stem cell collection)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stem Cell Collection Without In-vivo Purging With Bortezomib11
Stem Cell Collection With In-vivo Purging With Bortezomib13

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With High B-cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) Expression

"PFS is defined as the number of days from the date the participant was randomized to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) per investigator assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.~BCL-2 expression was determined through central laboratory testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and based on a pre-specified scoring algorithm. High clinical score of 2+: ≥50% of tumor cells with moderate or higher cytoplasmic staining but < 50% of tumor cells with strong staining intensity; high clinical score of 3+: ≥50% of tumor cells with strong cytoplasmic staining." (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Interventionmonths (Median)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone23.8
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone11.4

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Partial Response (PR) or better (PR, Very good partial response [VGPR], Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Response was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; median time on follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone81.4
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone69.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

"The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Physical Functioning scale, participants rate five items on a four-point scale, with 1 as not at all and 4 as very much. The Physical Functioning Scale scores range from 0 to 100 and were calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high scale score represents high/healthy level of functioning. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement." (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1Cycle 13, Day 1Cycle 15, Day 1Cycle 17, Day 1Cycle 19, Day 1Cycle 21, Day 1Cycle 23, Day 1Cycle 25, Day 1Cycle 27, Day 1Cycle 29, Day 1Cycle 31, Day 1Cycle 33, Day 1Cycle 35, Day 1Cycle 37, Day 1Cycle 39, Day 1Cycle 41, Day 1Cycle 43, Day 1Cycle 45, Day 1Cycle 47, Day 1Final visit
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone-4.6-7.8-8.6-8.0-7.5-8.8-7.3-8.6-7.0-8.5-7.50.5-3.3-4.02.2-4.84.415.08.913.313.313.30.0-10.0
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone-5.0-3.9-6.1-3.5-1.5-3.2-2.3-1.8-2.5-1.5-3.4-3.8-8.6-8.7-2.8-4.0-7.0-7.5-10.1-13.0-7.8-1.30.0-11.8

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] Score

PROMIS Cancer Fatigue SF is a seven item questionnaire that assesses the impact and experience of fatigue over the past 7 days. All questions employ the following five response options: 1 = Not at all, 2 = A little bit, 3 = Somewhat, 4 = Quite a bit, and 5 = Very much. The total raw score is the sum of the responses to each question and is converted to a T-score. The T-score re-scales the total raw score to a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The [PROMIS] Cancer Fatigue Short Form [SF] 7a T-Scores range from 29.4 to 83.2, with higher scores indicating more fatigue. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatment

,
InterventionT-score (Mean)
Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1Cycle 13, Day 1Cycle 15, Day 1Cycle 17, Day 1Cycle 19, Day 1Cycle 21, Day 1Cycle 23, Day 1Cycle 25, Day 1Cycle 27, Day 1Cycle 29, Day 1Cycle 31, Day 1Cycle 33, Day 1Cycle 35, Day 1Cycle 37, Day 1Cycle 39, Day 1Cycle 41, Day 1Cycle 43, Day 1Cycle 45, Day 1Cycle 47, Day 1Final visit
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone1.82.42.62.63.12.32.12.60.91.21.5-0.1-0.10.8-0.33.71.1-3.04.1-0.74.41.80.02.9
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone2.23.33.22.30.61.81.51.20.71.62.02.03.43.92.82.03.44.13.63.35.3-0.3-2.55.0

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS).

OS is defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. All events of death were to be included, regardless of whether the event occurred while the participant was still taking study drug or after the participant discontinued study drug. If a participant is not known to have died, OS was censored at the date of last contact. The distribution of OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up was 45.6 months for the venetoclax group and 45.6 months for the placebo group

Interventionmonths (Median)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneNA
Placebo + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneNA

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the number of days from the date the participant was randomized to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Median duration of follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Interventionmonths (Median)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone23.2
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone11.5

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

"The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/quality of life scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). For the Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale, participants rate two items on a seven point scale, with 1 as very poor and 7 as excellent. The Global Health Status/Quality of Life scale ranges from 0 to 100 and was calculated per the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (3rd edition), version 3.0. A high score for the global health status/QoL represents a high QoL. Positive changes from baseline indicate improvement." (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1Cycle 13, Day 1Cycle 15, Day 1Cycle 17, Day 1Cycle 19, Day 1Cycle 21, Day 1Cycle 23, Day 1Cycle 25, Day 1Cycle 27, Day 1Cycle 29, Day 1Cycle 31, Day 1Cycle 33, Day 1Cycle 35, Day 1Cycle 37, Day 1Cycle 39, Day 1Cycle 41, Day 1Cycle 43, Day 1Cycle 45, Day 1Cycle 47, Day 1Final visit
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone-2.2-2.5-6.7-6.7-5.2-1.70.5-7.70.8-5.6-1.0-4.54.2-1.15.6-7.14.210.40.08.3-8.34.2-8.3-6.7
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone-1.9-5.1-8.3-6.9-0.5-1.0-4.9-5.1-1.3-6.6-2.9-4.7-9.0-6.9-4.8-7.7-3.8-13.7-9.3-11.02.0-1.710.4-8.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) Worst Pain

"The BPI-SF is a pain-specific measure developed to assess patient-reported severity (or intensity) of pain (4 items) and the impact of pain on daily functioning (7 items) in patients with cancer pain. The four pain severity items assess pain at its worst in last 24 hours, least in last 24 hours, average, and now (current pain). For these items, participants are asked to rate their pain on an 11-point numeric rating scale with anchors of 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The Worst Pain scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating severe pain. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement." (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Baseline; Cycle 3 (Cycles 1 - 8 are 21 days, Cycles 9 and beyond are 35 days) through Cycle 47, collected on Day 1 of every other cycle and at the Treatment Completion Visit (TCV) while participant is on treatment

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 3, Day 1Cycle 5, Day 1Cycle 7, Day 1Cycle 9, Day 1Cycle 11, Day 1Cycle 13, Day 1Cycle 15, Day 1Cycle 17, Day 1Cycle 19, Day 1Cycle 21, Day 1Cycle 23, Day 1Cycle 25, Day 1Cycle 27, Day 1Cycle 29, Day 1Cycle 31, Day 1Cycle 33, Day 1Cycle 35, Day 1Cycle 37, Day 1Cycle 39, Day 1Cycle 41, Day 1Cycle 43, Day 1Cycle 45, Day 1Cycle 47, Day 1Final visit
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone-0.5-0.20.20.00.1-0.1-0.0-0.1-0.2-0.3-0.20.20.10.30.60.4-0.21.5-0.30.30.51.01.00.4
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone-0.60.0-0.1-0.2-0.4-0.2-0.2-0.3-0.1-0.1-0.00.40.2-0.20.0-0.20.10.40.10.1-0.1-0.7-2.80.3

[back to top]

Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response Rate

The percentage of participants with documented best overall response of Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or better (VGPR, Complete response [CR], or Stringent complete response [sCR]) per 2016 standard International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) was computed. (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Response was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; median time on follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone60.3
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone38.1

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the number of days from the date of randomization to the date of first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. TTP was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Median time on follow-up up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Interventionmonths (Median)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone25.4
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone12.2

[back to top]

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity Rate

MRD negativity rate is defined as the percentage of participants who have negative MRD by bone marrow aspirate at any time point after randomization and before progression or starting subsequent therapy. MRD negativity was defined at 10^-5 threshold (less than one residual myeloma cell per 10^5 total nucleated cells) as measured by centralized testing of bone marrow aspirate by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). MRD positive participants include those of which all tested samples were found to be MRD positive or indeterminate. Participants with missing or unevaluable MRD status were considered as MRD positive. (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Assessed at Screening; to confirm a stringent Complete Response (sCR) or Complete Response (CR); at 6 months and 12 months post-confirmed CR/sCR

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone15.5
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone2.1

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the number of days from the participant's date of first documented response (partial response [PR] or better) to the date of first documented progressive disease (PD) as determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) or death due to multiple myeloma, whichever occurs first. DOR was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology. (NCT02755597)
Timeframe: Response was assessed at Cycle 1, Day 1, and on Day 1 of every cycle thereafter; median time on follow-up was 28.6 months for the venetoclax group and 28.6 months for the placebo group

Interventionmonths (Median)
Venetoclax + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneNA
Placebo + Bortezomib and Dexamethasone12.8

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease according to the IMWG criteria. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)NA
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)NA
Safety Run-in: D-RVdNA

[back to top]

Time to Partial Response (PR) or Better

Time to PR or better is the duration from the date of randomization to the date of initial documentation of PR or better, which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of initial documentation of PR or better (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)0.8
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)0.8
Safety Run-in: D-RVd0.8

[back to top]

Time to Complete Response or Better

Time to CR or better is the duration from the date of randomization to the date of initial documentation of CR or better, which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of initial documentation of CR (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)9.6
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)8.9
Safety Run-in: D-RVd7.7

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or death, whichever comes first. PD is defined as an increase of 25 % from the lowest response value in one of the following: serum and urine M-component (absolute increase must be >= 0.5 g/dL and >=200 mg/24 hours respectively); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL); Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or death (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)NA
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)NA
Safety Run-in: D-RVdNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)

Percentage of participants who had achieved sCR as determined by the validated computer algorithm according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, by the end of post-autologous stem cell transplantation (post-ASCT) consolidation treatment were reported. Complete response (CR) is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and less than (<) 5 percent (%) PCs in bone marrow. sCR is defined as in addition to CR a normal FLC ratio, and absence of clonal plasma cells (PCs) by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence or 2 to 4-color flow cytometry. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) before maintenance treatment (up to 10 months)

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)32.0
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)42.4

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of initial documentation of participant's death (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)NA
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)NA
Safety Run-in: D-RVdNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better

VGPR or better rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved VGPR or better, according to the IMWG criteria. VGPR is defined as serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein <100 mg/24 hours. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) and at the end of maintenance period of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
At the end of induction prior to ASCTAt the end of ASCT prior to consolidationAt the end of post-ASCT consolidationAt the End of Maintenance Period (up to 24 Months)
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)71.786.990.996.0
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)56.766.073.277.6
Safety Run-in: D-RVd68.8100100100.0

[back to top]

Time to Stringent Complete Response (sCR)

Time to sCR is the duration from the date of randomization to the date of initial documentation of sCR, which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of initial documentation of sCR (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)14.3
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)10.2
Safety Run-in: D-RVd8.4

[back to top]

Duration of Stringent Complete Response (sCR)

Duration of sCR is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a sCR response, according to the IMWG criteria, to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease, or relapse from sCR. PD is defined as an increase of 25 % from the lowest response value in one of the following: serum and urine M component (absolute increase must be >= 0.5 g/dL and >=200 mg/24 hours respectively); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL); Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or relapse from sCR (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)NA
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)NA
Safety Run-in: D-RVdNA

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of response is defined as the duration from the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) according to the IMWG criteria to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease according to the IMWG criteria. PD is defined as an increase of 25 % from the lowest response value in one of the following: serum and urine M-component (absolute increase must be >= 0.5 g/dL and >=200 mg/24 hours respectively); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL); Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)NA
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)NA
Safety Run-in: D-RVdNA

[back to top]

Duration of Complete Response or Better

Duration of CR or better is the duration from the date of initial documentation of a CR or sCR response, according to the IMWG criteria, to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PR), or relapse from CR. PD is defined as an increase of 25 % from the lowest response value in one of the following: serum and urine M-component (absolute increase must be greater than or equal to [>=] 0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dL] and >=200 milligrams [mg]/24 hours respectively); Only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL); Definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to plasma cells (PCs) proliferative disorder. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease or relapse from CR (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)NA
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)NA
Safety Run-in: D-RVdNA

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Negative Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

Minimal residual disease negative rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve MRD negative status by the respective time point. Minimal residual disease was evaluated in participants who achieved CR or sCR (including participants with VGPR or better and suspected daratumumab interference) using next-generation sequencing which utilizes multiple myeloma cell DNA from bone marrow aspirates at a threshold of less than (<) 10^5. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) (up to 4.5 months), and at the end of maintenance period of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
MRD from randomization to prior to ASCT (10^5)Post ASCT consolidation (10^5)At the End of Maintenance Period (up to 24 Months) (10^5)
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)22.150.064.4
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)7.820.430.1
Safety Run-in: D-RVd18.850.081.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR- percentage of participants who achieved partial response (PR) or better (PR, Very Good Partial Response [VGPR], CR or sCR) based on computerized algorithm as per IMWG criteria. PR -greater than or equal to (>=) 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg//24 hours. If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of >=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required. A >=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required; VGPR-serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein <100 mg/24 hours; CR-negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% PCs in bone marrow. sCR- in addition to CR a normal FLC ratio, and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence or 2 to 4-color flow cytometry. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) and at the end of maintenance treatment of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
At the end of induction prior to ASCTAt the end of ASCT prior to consolidationAt the end of post-ASCT consolidationAt the End of Maintenance Treatment (up to 24 Months)
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)98.099.099.099.0
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)91.891.891.891.8
Safety Run-in: D-RVd100100100100.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Stringent Complete Response (sCR)

Overall sCR rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved sCR, according to the IMWG criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and < 5 % PCs in bone marrow. sCR is defined as in addition to CR a normal FLC ratio, and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence or 2 to 4-color flow cytometry. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) and at the end of maintenance treatment of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
At the end of induction prior to ASCTAt the end of ASCT prior to consolidationAt the end of post-ASCT consolidationAt the end of Maintenance Treatment (up to 24 Months)
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)12.121.242.467.0
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)7.214.432.048.0
Safety Run-in: D-RVd043.856.393.8

[back to top]

Time to Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better

Time to VGPR or better is the duration from the date of randomization to the date of initial documentation of VGPR or better, which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to the date of initial documentation of VGPR or better (up to 5 years)

InterventionMonths (Median)
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)3.0
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)2.2
Safety Run-in: D-RVd2.1

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Better

CR or better rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR or sCR, according to the IMWG criteria. CR is negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas, and < 5% PCs in bone marrow. sCR is defined as in addition to CR a normal FLC ratio, and absence of clonal plasma cells (PCs) by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence or 2 to 4-color flow cytometry. For 2 participants (1 in each randomized treatment group), data were updated by the study sites which resulted in their inclusion to the response-evaluable analysis set after the primary analysis. (NCT02874742)
Timeframe: From randomization to end of following: induction treatment, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation (after Cycle 6) and at the end of maintenance period of 24 months (overall duration up to 34 months)

,,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
At the end of induction prior to ASCTAt the end of ASCT prior to consolidationAt the end of post-ASCT consolidationAt the end of maintenance period (up to 24 Months)
Randomized: Daratumumab+RVd (D-RVd)19.227.351.583.0
Randomized: Lenalidomide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone (RVd)13.419.642.360.2
Safety Run-in: D-RVd12.556.368.893.8

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS) at Landmark Points - 20 Months

PFS at landmark points are the percentage of participants without progression (i.e., KM estimates) at the landmark time endpoints. (NCT02902965)
Timeframe: The median time on study was 19.6 months (range: 0.16+, 24.64), with the 20 month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) rate presented based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ibrutinib+ Bortezomib+ Dexamethasone6.6

[back to top]

Safety and Tolerability of Ibrutinib in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone as Measured by the Number of Participants With Adverse Events.

Safety and tolerability of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone as measured by the frequency and type of adverse events graded using the NCI CTCAE v 4.03. Frequency and Type of Adverse Events are reported in the Adverse Events module (NCT02902965)
Timeframe: From first dose of Ibrutinib to within 30 days of last dose for each participant or until study closure. This is the median treatment duration for Ibrutinib of 5.7 months (range: 0.1 - 23.7 months) +30 days (Adverse Events collection period).

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ibrutinib+ Bortezomib+ Dexamethasone74

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time from date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented evidence of PD or date of censoring for the participants not progressed. The censoring date is the last adequate tumor assessment date. (NCT02902965)
Timeframe: The median time on study was 19.6 months (range: 0.16+, 24.64).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ibrutinib+ Bortezomib+ Dexamethasone10.6

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

The time interval between the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) and the date of first documented evidence of PD, death, or date of censoring for the participants not progressed/died. The censoring date is the last adequate tumor assessment date. (NCT02902965)
Timeframe: The median time on study was 19.6 months (range: 0.16+, 24.64).

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ibrutinib+ Bortezomib+ Dexamethasone9.5

[back to top]

Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

The primary efficacy endpoint of this study is mPFS. Progression free survival is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to confirmed disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT02902965)
Timeframe: The median time on study was 19.6 months (range: 0.16+, 24.64). Participants were evaluated for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) during their entire time on the study.

InterventionMonths (Median)
Ibrutinib+ Bortezomib+ Dexamethasone8.5

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall Response Rate is the percentage of participants who achieve a PR or better over the course of the study but prior to initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy (NCT02902965)
Timeframe: The median time on study was 19.6 months (range: 0.16+, 24.64). Participants were evaluated for Overall Response (OR) during the entire time on the study.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ibrutinib+ Bortezomib+ Dexamethasone56.8

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) at 24 Months

As the median overall survival has not been reached, the data for the landmark analysis at 24 months are provided. (NCT02902965)
Timeframe: The median time on study was 19.6 months (0.16+, 24.64), with the 24 month Overall Survival (OS) rate presented based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ibrutinib+ Bortezomib+ Dexamethasone53.6

[back to top] [back to top]

Phase 1: The Number of Subjects With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)

"Determined by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria.~CR: Negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft-tissue plasmacytomas, and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow; in patients for whom only measurable disease is by serum free light chain (FLC) level, normal FLC ratio of 0.26 to 1.65 in addition to CR criteria is required; 2 consecutive assessments are needed.~VGPR: Serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hours (hrs); in patients for whom only measurable disease is by serum FLC level, >90% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, in addition to VGPR criteria, is required; 2 consecutive assessments are needed" (NCT02928029)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 2 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Radium-223 Dichloride 33 kBq/kg + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneNA
Radium-223 Dichloride 55 kBq/kg + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneNA

[back to top]

Phase 1: MTD/RP2D Determined by the Incidence of DLTs

Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) determined by incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 for the severity grade (NCT02928029)
Timeframe: From the start of study medication through 3 weeks after administration of the second dose of radium-223 dichloride, assessed up to 9 weeks

InterventionKBq/kg (Number)
Radium-223 Dichloride 33 kBq/kg + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneNA
Radium-223 Dichloride 55 kBq/kg + Bortezomib and DexamethasoneNA

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of first dose (start of induction) to the date of death due to any cause. (NCT02951819)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)NA
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM)NA

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined for participants with a confirmed response (PR or better) as the duration from the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) according to the IMWG criteria to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease according to the IMWG criteria or death due to progressive disease. PR:>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24hours. If serum and urine M-protein are unmeasurable, a >=50% decrease in difference involved and uninvolved FLC levels required in place of M-protein criteria. If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, >=50% reduction in PCs is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow PCs % was >=30%. In addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT02951819)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)NA
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM)20.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent-Adverse Event

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between administration of study drug and approximately up to 36 months that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. (NCT02951819)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)100.0
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM)100.0

[back to top]

Time to Disease Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time between the date of first dose (start of induction) and the date of first documented evidence of confirmed PD, as defined in the IMWG response criteria. PD per IMWG criteria: Increase of 25% from lowest response value in one of following: Serum and urine M-component (absolute increase >=0.5 g/deciliter (dL) and >=200 mg/24 hours respectively); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase>10 mg/dL); Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow PC% (absolute % >=10%); Bone marrow PC%: absolute% >10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas and Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to the PC proliferative disorder. (NCT02951819)
Timeframe: Approximately 15 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)NA
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM)13.31

[back to top]

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS: duration from date of first dose (start of induction) to date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PD) based on computerized algorithm per IMWG criteria or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. PD: 25% increase from lowest response value in one of following: Serum and urine M-component (absolute increase >=0.5 g/dL and >=200 mg/24 hours respectively);Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase>10 mg/dL);Only participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, without measurable disease by FLC levels, bone marrow PC% (absolute % >=10%); Bone marrow PC%: absolute% >10%; Definite development of new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas/definite increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas, Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder. (NCT02951819)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)NA
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM)21.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Response (CR) or Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)

Percentage of participants who achieved CR or VGPR (as per International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] criteria) was reported. CR: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and less than (<) 5 percent (%) plasma cells (PC) in bone marrow. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or greater than or equal to (>=) 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 milligram per 24 hours (mg/24hours). (NCT02951819)
Timeframe: After 4 cycles of Induction (Approximately 4 months)

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)44.2
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM)57.1

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR: percentage of participants achieved PR or better (PR,VGPR,CR,sCR) per IMWG. CR:negative immunofixation on serum, urine, disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5% PCs in bone marrow(BM). sCR:CR plus normal FLC ratio,absence of clonal cells in BM by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence. VGPR:Serum, urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24hours. PR:>=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24hours urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200mg/24hours. If serum, urine M-protein unmeasurable, a>=50% decrease in difference involved and uninvolved FLC levels required in place of M-protein criteria. If serum, urine M-protein not measurable, serum free light assay is not measurable,>=50% reduction in PCs required in place of M-protein,provided baseline bone marrow PCs% >=30%, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT02951819)
Timeframe: After 4 Cycles of Induction (4 months), at End of Induction (4 to 8 months) and at the End of Maintenance (12 months)

,
InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
After 4 Cycles of InductionAt the End of InductionAt the End of Maintenance
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)79.187.289.5
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM)71.478.685.7

[back to top]

Time to Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better

Time to VGPR or Better response was defined as duration from the date of first dose (start of induction) to the date of initial documentation of the response (VGPR or better) which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria. VGPR is defined by IMWG criteria as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or greater than or equal to (>=) 90 % reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 milligram/24 hours (mg/24 hours). (NCT02951819)
Timeframe: Up to 36 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)3.8
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM)1.8

[back to top]

Time to Partial Response (PR) or Better

Time to PR or Better response was defined as duration from the date of first dose (start of induction) to the date of initial documentation of the response (PR or better) which was confirmed by a repeated measurement as required by the IMWG criteria. PR is defined as per IMWG criteria as >= 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by >= 90% or to < 200 mg/24hours. If the serum and urine M-protein are unmeasurable, a>= 50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved Free light chain (FLC) levels is required in the place of the M-protein criteria. If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, >=50% reduction in plasma cells is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cells percentage was >=30%. In addition to the above listed criteria, if present at baseline, a >= 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT02951819)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionMonths (Median)
Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)1.0
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RMM)1.0

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by IRC

PFS was defined as time from date of randomization until the first date of IRC-confirmed PD, per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PD included increase of 25% from lowest confirmed response value in 1 or more of the following criteria: a) serum M-protein with absolute increase of >= 0.5 gram per deciliter (g/dL); b) serum M-protein increase >= 1 g/dL if the lowest M-component was >=5 g/dL; c) urine M-protein (absolute increase must be >= 200 mg per 24 hours); d) in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase must be greater than [>] 10 mg/dL); e) in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels and without measurable involved FLC levels: bone marrow plasma cell percentage irrespective of baseline status (absolute increase must be >=10%). (NCT03110562)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until IRC-confirmed documented PD or death, censored date, whichever occurred first (up to 32 months)

InterventionMonths (Median)
SVd Arm: Selinexor + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone13.93
Vd Arm: Bortezomib + Dexamethasone9.46

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate

Clinical benefit rate defined as minimal response or better (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of at least one disease assessment, up to 100 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental25.0

[back to top]

Duration of Response

Duration of Response defined as the time, in months, from the date of first documentation of response to the date of disease progression. Response was assessed according to the IMWG classification response criteria. (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first documentation of response to the date of disease progression, up to 100 weeks

Interventionmonths (Number)
Experimental9.2

[back to top]

Disease Control Rate

Disease control rate defined as stable disease [SD] or better (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of at least one disease assessment, up to 100 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental87.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival at 6 Months

"Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the first drug-related event leading to treatment discontinuation, documented PD or death.~Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions." (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of onset of the first drug-related event leading to treatment discontinuation, documented PD or death, up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental25.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival at 12 Months

Overall survival (OS) was defined as death of any cause. (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of death (of any cause) or last patient contact, up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental55.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival at 6 Months

Overall survival (OS) was defined as death of any cause. (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of death (of any cause) or last patient contact, up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental55.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression Disease at 6 Months

Progression disease was defined as documented PD or death due to PD. Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death due to PD, up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental25.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival at 12 Months

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time, in months, from the date of first drug administration to the date of documented PD, or death (of any cause). If any patient was lost to follow-up before PD or received another antitumor therapy, PFS was to be censored on the date of the last tumor assessment. If there were no tumor assessments, these parameters were to be censored on the date of the first drug administration Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions. (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of documented PD, or death (of any cause), up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental25.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival at 3 Months

Progression-free Survival was defined as documented PD, or death of any cause. Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions. (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of documented PD, or death (of any cause), up to 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental37.5

[back to top]

Progression-free Survival

"Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time, in months, from the date of first drug administration to the date of documented PD, or death (of any cause). If any patient was lost to follow-up before PD or received another antitumor therapy, PFS was to be censored on the date of the last tumor assessment. If there were no tumor assessments, these parameters were to be censored on the date of the first drug administration.~Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions." (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of documented PD, or death (of any cause), up to 100 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Experimental2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival at 3 Months

"Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the first drug-related event leading to treatment discontinuation, documented PD or death.~rogressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions." (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of onset of the first drug-related event leading to treatment discontinuation, documented PD or death, up to 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental37.5

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Event-free Survival at 12 Months

"Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the first drug-related event leading to treatment discontinuation, documented PD or death.~Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions." (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of onset of the first drug-related event leading to treatment discontinuation, documented PD or death, up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental25.0

[back to top]

Time to Progression

"Time to progression (TTP) was defined as the time, in months, from the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death due to PD. TTP was to be censored on the date of the last tumor assessment or on the date of the first drug administration if there were no tumor assessments.~Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions." (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death due to PD, up to 100 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Experimental2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months

Progression-free Survival was defined as documented PD, or death of any cause. Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions. (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of documented PD, or death (of any cause), up to 6 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental25.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression Disease at 12 Months

Progression disease was defined as documented PD or death due to PD. Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions. (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death due to PD, up to 12 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental25.0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Progression Disease at 3 Months

Progression disease was defined as documented PD or death due to PD Progressive disease (PD): 25% increase from the lowest response value in any of the following: serum M-protein, urine M-protein, BM plasma cell percentage, or difference in the kappa and lambda FLC. PD also diagnosed when an increase size or new bone lesions. (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of the first infusion to the date of documented PD or death due to PD, up to 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental37.5

[back to top]

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time, in months, from the date of first drug administration to the date of death (of any cause) or last patient contact (in this case, survival was to be censored on that date). (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of death (of any cause) or last patient contact, up to 100 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
ExperimentalNA

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate

The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) (including stringent complete response [sCR], complete response [CR], very good partial response [VGPR] and partial response [PR]), according to the IMWG response criteria. (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of at least one disease assessment, up to 100 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Experimental12.5

[back to top]

Event-free Survival

Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time, in months, from the date of first drug administration to the date of onset of the first drug-related event leading to treatment discontinuation, documented PD or death. The censoring rules defined above for PFS were used for EFS (NCT03117361)
Timeframe: From the date of first drug administration to the date of onset of the first drug-related event leading to treatment discontinuation, documented PD or death, up to 100 weeks

Interventionmonths (Median)
Experimental2.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Overall Complete Hematologic Response (CHR)

Overall CHR rate was defined as percentage of participants who achieved CHR, according to the International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria. CHR: normalization of free light chain levels and ratio, negative serum, and urine immunofixation. If involved free light chain (iFLC) is less than (<) upper limit of normal (ULN) and serum and urine Immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) are negative, then neither a normal uninvolved free light chain (uFLC) level nor a normal free light chain (FLC) ratio are required for complete response (CR). (NCT03201965)
Timeframe: Up to 2.4 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CyBorD18.1
Daratumumab Plus CyBorD53.3

[back to top]

D-VMP, D-Rd and D-Kd Cohorts: Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the time from the date of initial documented response (PR or better response) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PD) or death due to PD. PD is defined as an increase of 25% from the lowest response value in one of the following: serum and urine M-component (absolute increase must be >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dL] and >=200 mg/24 hours respectively); only in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase must be >10 mg/dL); definite development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) that can be attributed solely to PC proliferative disorder. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 2 years 7 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
D + Bortezomib + Melphalan + Prednisone (D-VMP)NA
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (D-Rd)NA
Daratumumab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (D-Kd)NA

[back to top]

D-VMP, D-Rd, and D-Kd Cohorts: Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved partial response (PR) or better according to international myeloma working group (IMWG) criteria. IMWG criteria for PR: greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by >=90% or to less than (<) 200 milligrams (mg) per 24 hours, If the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of >=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria, If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells (PCs) is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was >=30%. In addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
D + Bortezomib + Melphalan + Prednisone (D-VMP)88.1
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (D-Rd)90.8
Daratumumab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (D-Kd)84.8

[back to top]

D-VMP, D-Rd, and D-Kd Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With VGPR or Better Response

VGPR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved VGPR or CR (including sCR) according to the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment. VGPR: Serum and urine component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hour; CR: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% PCs in bone marrow; sCR: CR in addition to having a normal FLC ratio and an absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, 2-4 color flow cytometry. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: From baseline up to 2 years 7 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
D + Bortezomib + Melphalan + Prednisone (D-VMP)77.6
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (D-Rd)80.0
Daratumumab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (D-Kd)77.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anti-rHuPH20 Antibodies

Percentage of participants with antibodies to rHuPH20 were reported. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: For D-VRD Arm: Baseline up to 2 years 3 months; For D-VMP, D-Rd and D-Kd Arms: Baseline up to 2 years 7 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daratumumab (D)+Bortezomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone (D-VRd)6.1
D + Bortezomib + Melphalan + Prednisone (D-VMP)3.1
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (D-Rd)4.8
Daratumumab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (D-Kd)4.7

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Daratumumab Antibodies

Percentage of participants with antibodies to daratumumab were reported. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: For D-VRD Arm: Baseline up to 2 years 3 months; For D-VMP, D-Rd and D-Kd Arms: Baseline up to 2 years 7 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daratumumab (D)+Bortezomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone (D-VRd)0
D + Bortezomib + Melphalan + Prednisone (D-VMP)0
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (D-Rd)0
Daratumumab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (D-Kd)0

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With CR or Better Response

CR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a CR or better response (that is, CR and sCR) as per IMWG criteria. CR: as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and less than (<) 5 percent plasma cells in bone marrow; sCR: CR plus normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal PCs by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: For D-VRD Arm: Baseline up to 2 years 3 months; For D-VMP, D-Rd and D-Kd Arms: Baseline up to 2 years 7 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daratumumab (D)+Bortezomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone (D-VRd)16.4
D + Bortezomib + Melphalan + Prednisone (D-VMP)55.2
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (D-Rd)50.8
Daratumumab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (D-Kd)42.4

[back to top]

D-VRd Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a PR or better, IMWG criteria, during the study or during follow up. IMWG criteria for PR >= 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urinary M-protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24 hours, if the serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, a decrease of >=50% in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required in place of the M-protein criteria, If serum and urine M-protein are not measurable, and serum free light assay is also not measurable, >=50% reduction in bone marrow PCs is required in place of M-protein, provided baseline bone marrow plasma cell percentage was >=30%, in addition to the above criteria, if present at baseline, a >=50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years and 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daratumumab (D)+Bortezomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone (D-VRd)97.0

[back to top]

D-VMP, D-Rd, and D-Kd Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Rate

MRD negativity rate was defined as the percentage of participants who were considered MRD negative after MRD testing at any timepoint after the first dose by bone marrow aspirate. MRD negativity rate was assessed by next-generation sequencing at a threshold of <10^5. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years and 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
D + Bortezomib + Melphalan + Prednisone (D-VMP)25.4
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (D-Rd)21.5
Daratumumab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (D-Kd)27.3

[back to top] [back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Daratumumab

Cmax was defined as maximum serum concentration observed following daratumumab administration. Each cycle for: D-VRd cohort is of 21 days, D-VMP cohort is of 42 days and D-Rd and D-Kd cohorts is of 28 days. Each cohort have a treatment period of 84 days. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: D-VRd: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 4 and post treatment at Week 8; D-VMP: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 2 and post treatment at Week 8; D-Rd and D-Kd: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 3 and post treatment at Week 8

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 4Cycle 3 Day 4
Daratumumab + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone (D-Rd)108648

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Daratumumab

Cmax was defined as maximum serum concentration observed following daratumumab administration. Each cycle for: D-VRd cohort is of 21 days, D-VMP cohort is of 42 days and D-Rd and D-Kd cohorts is of 28 days. Each cohort have a treatment period of 84 days. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: D-VRd: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 4 and post treatment at Week 8; D-VMP: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 2 and post treatment at Week 8; D-Rd and D-Kd: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 3 and post treatment at Week 8

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 4Cycle 2 Day 4Post-treatment Phase Week 8
D + Bortezomib + Melphalan + Prednisone (D-VMP)98.6612162

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Daratumumab

Cmax was defined as maximum serum concentration observed following daratumumab administration. Each cycle for: D-VRd cohort is of 21 days, D-VMP cohort is of 42 days and D-Rd and D-Kd cohorts is of 28 days. Each cohort have a treatment period of 84 days. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: D-VRd: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 4 and post treatment at Week 8; D-VMP: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 2 and post treatment at Week 8; D-Rd and D-Kd: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 3 and post treatment at Week 8

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 4Cycle 3 Day 4Post-treatment Phase Week 8
Daratumumab + Carfilzomib + Dexamethasone (D-Kd)13786949.3

[back to top]

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Daratumumab

Cmax was defined as maximum serum concentration observed following daratumumab administration. Each cycle for: D-VRd cohort is of 21 days, D-VMP cohort is of 42 days and D-Rd and D-Kd cohorts is of 28 days. Each cohort have a treatment period of 84 days. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: D-VRd: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 4 and post treatment at Week 8; D-VMP: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 2 and post treatment at Week 8; D-Rd and D-Kd: Day 4 of Cycles 1 and 3 and post treatment at Week 8

Interventionmicrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 4Cycle 4 Day 4Post-treatment Phase Week 8
Daratumumab (D)+Bortezomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone (D-VRd)100746263

[back to top]

D-VRd Cohort: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response

VGPR or better rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved VGPR or complete response (CR) (including stringent complete response [sCR]) according to the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment. VGPR: Serum and urine component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis, or >= 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hour; CR: negative immunofixation on the serum and urine, Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% PCs in bone marrow; sCR: CR in addition to having a normal FLC ratio and an absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, 2-4 color flow cytometry. (NCT03412565)
Timeframe: Up to 2 years and 3 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Daratumumab (D)+Bortezomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone (D-VRd)71.6

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Bone Lesions (Bone Evaluation)

(NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy100.0
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy59.1
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy64.0

[back to top]

PFS From the Start of Study Treatment

PFS was defined as the period from the first dose of treatment in Treatment Period I to the time of confirmed PD or confirmed death (regardless of the cause of death), whichever is earlier. PFS was assessed by IMWG Criteria. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone TherapyNA
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy28.96
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy28.96

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months From the Start of Study Treatment

PFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who were alive and have not had disease progression at 12 months after the date of first dose of treatment in Treatment Period I. PFS was assessed by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria (2014 version). Per IMWG criteria, progressive disease (PD): serum M-component increase ≥0.5 g/dl or urine M-component increase ≥200 mg/24-hour/ difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels increase >10 mg/dl or bone marrow plasma cell ≥10%/ development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma or development of hypercalcemia. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 12 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy50.0
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy48.7
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy48.9

[back to top] [back to top]

Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive or Negative in Bone Marrow in Participants Who Achieved CR

MRD was measured by the flow cytometry method using bone marrow aspiration. Reported data were numbers of participants with MRD positive and negative in bone marrow in participants who achieved CR. MRD positive was categorized into three sensitivity levels with the numbers of cells counted (10^-4 to - Max; 10^-5 to 10^-4; 10^-6 to 10^-5). MRD negativity is defined as absence of MRD and MRD positivity is defined as presence of MRD. If a participant is MRD-positive at their first evaluation and MRD-negative after re-examination, the participant will be considered to be MRD-negative. CR will be assessed by IMWG Criteria. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sensitivity Level; 10^-4=< - MaxSensitivity Level; 10^-5=< - <10^-4Sensitivity Level; 10^-6=< - <10^-5Negative
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy1215
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy1325
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy0110

[back to top] [back to top] [back to top]

Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score

EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 23 cycles for VRd Group, Up to 32 cycles for KRd and Overall Group, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: Cycle 23Disease Symptoms: Cycle 32Side-Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide-Effects of Treatment: Cycle 23Side-Effects of Treatment: Cycle 32Body Image: BaselineBody Image: Cycle 23Body Image: Cycle 32Future Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: Cycle 23Future Perspective: Cycle 32
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy19.234.632.7816.6016.0518.5223.0816.6716.6744.1635.1927.78
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy19.883.972.7816.6114.2918.5225.9314.2916.6747.1631.7527.78

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve or Maintain Any Best Response

Best response is defined as the cumulative numbers of participants who achieve each level of best response including PR, VGPR and CR assessed with IMWG Criteria, after each cycle of treatment. Per IMWG criteria, PR (partial response): ≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels/ ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/ ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR (very good PR): serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine Mprotein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR (complete response): negative immunofixation on serum+urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

,,
InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
CRVGPRPR
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy23.120.528.2
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy24.417.831.1
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy33.3050.0

[back to top]

Relative Dose Intensity (RDI)

RDI for each study drug is defined as 100*(Total amount of dose taken)/(Total prescribed dose of treated cycles), where total prescribed dose equals [dose prescribed at enrollment* number of prescribed doses per cycle* the number of treated cycles]. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionPercent (Median)
Bortezomib, IxazomibCarfilzomib, IxazomibBortezomib/Carfilzomib, IxazomibLenalidomideDexamethasone
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy71.9387.7083.2447.1848.61

[back to top]

Overall Survival (OS) From the Start of Study Treatment

OS was defined as the period from the first dose of treatment in Treatment Period I to the time when death (regardless of the cause of death) was confirmed. Participants who were still alive were censored at the last confirmed date of survival or the date of data cut-off, whichever was earlier. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone TherapyNA
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone TherapyNA
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib TherapyNA

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Duration of Hospital Stay Per Participants

HCRU was calculated from Exposure-adjusted rate of hospitalization events (per participants-months) and the duration of hospitalization among participants in Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II. Duration of hospital stay per participants in Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II was reported. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionDays (Mean)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy14.8
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy19.4
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy18.8

[back to top]

Patient-Reported Outcome HRQoL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score

EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, and side effects of treatment). Scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale. For the functional scales, high scores represent improvement. For the symptom scales, higher scores represent worsening. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 23 cycles for VRd Group, Up to 32 cycles for KRd and Overall Group, each cycle was of 28 days)

InterventionScore on a Scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: Cycle 23Side-Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide-Effects of Treatment: Cycle 23Body Image: BaselineBody Image: Cycle 23Future Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: Cycle 23
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy24.07016.673.7044.44066.6711.11

[back to top]

Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Events With Hospitalization Per Participants-Month

HCRU was calculated from Exposure-adjusted rate of hospitalization events (per participants-months) and the duration of hospitalization among participants in Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II. Number of events with hospitalization per participants-month in Treatment Period I and Treatment Period II was reported. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionNumber of Events per Participants-Month (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy1.9
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy2.9
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy2.7

[back to top]

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy6
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy35
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy41

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Continuing Treatment With Ixazomib at 12 Months From the Start of Study Treatment

(NCT03416374)
Timeframe: 12 months

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy50.0
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy35.9
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy37.8

[back to top]

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a best response of PR or better including stringent complete response (sCR), VGPR and PR assessed with IMWG Criteria, after the start of the study treatment. Per IMWG criteria, PR (partial response): ≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels/ ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/ ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR (very good PR): serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine Mprotein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR (complete response): negative immunofixation on serum+urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy83.3
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy71.8
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy73.3

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved VGPR or Better (CR + VGPR)

VGPR or better (CR + VGPR) were assessed by IMWG Criteria. Per IMWG criteria, PR (partial response): ≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels/ ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/ ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR (very good PR): serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine Mprotein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR (complete response): negative immunofixation on serum+urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy33.3
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy43.6
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy42.2

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of response ≥PR to the date of first documentation of PD or death due to any cause. PR and PD will be assessed with IMWG Criteria. Per IMWG criteria, PR (partial response): ≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels/ ≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/ ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR (very good PR): serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine Mprotein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR (complete response): negative immunofixation on serum+urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy15.31
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy28.03
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy28.03

[back to top]

Duration of Therapy (DOT)

DOT is defined as the treatment duration of study drug at study treatment Period I. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionMonths (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy14.69
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy12.43
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy12.43

[back to top]

Evaluation of Modified Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs)

Modified QALYs was calculated from the score of EORTC QLQ-C30. The health-related quality of life scale score of EORTC QLQ-C30 was converted into a utility value ranging from 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health), and used to adjust the value of survival years; this value was assessed as the modified QALY. (NCT03416374)
Timeframe: Up to 39 months as a maximum

InterventionQuality-Adjusted Life-Years (Median)
[VRd]; Bortezomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy0.467
[KRd]; Carfilzomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone Therapy0.534
[Overall]; Combination Therapy + Ixazomib Therapy0.518

[back to top] [back to top]

Overall Survival (OS)

Time from the first dose of melflufen to death due to any cause. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Up to 24 months following confirmed disease progression, or initiation of subsequent therapy (a maximum of 198.9 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 30 mg33.5
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 40 mgNA
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 30 mg35.0
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 40 mg18.3

[back to top]

Time to Response (TTR)

Time from Cycle 1 Day 1 to a response of PR or better. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, death or initiation of subsequent therapy (a maximum of 194.3 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 30 mg3.0
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 40 mg2.2
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 30 mg3.3
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 40 mg1.1

[back to top]

Best Response (BR)

BR defined by International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria. BR= Complete Response (CR)/Stringent CR (sCR) defined as below negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow/plus normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow by immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence, Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)= serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or > 90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours, Partial Response (PR)= a > 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hours urinary M-protein by > 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours, Minimal Response (MR), Stable Disease (SD)= not meeting the criteria for other response options, Progressive Disease (PD)= increase of > 25% from lowest response value in serum/urine M-component or bone marrow plasma cell percentage, or non-evaluable. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, death or initiation of subsequent therapy (a maximum of 194.3 weeks)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
CRsCRVGPRPRMRSDPDNon-evaluableMissing
Regimen A - Melflufen 30mg + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone102911001
Regimen A - Melflufen 40mg + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone013201001
Regimen B - Melflufen 30mg + Daratumumab + Dexamethasone102200001
Regimen B - Melflufen 40mg + Daratumumab + Dexamethasone1161112104

[back to top]

Number of Participants Who Experienced a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

TEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) that started after the first dose of study medication was administered and within 30 days of the last administration of the study treatment or before start of subsequent anticancer treatment (whichever occurred first) or that worsened after the first dose of study medication was administered. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 up to a maximum of 198.9 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEsAny Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 30 mg1515
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 40 mg88
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 30 mg66
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 40 mg2726

[back to top]

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP defined as time from first dose to first documented confirmed progression. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, death or initiation of subsequent therapy (a maximum of 194.3 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 30 mg17.6
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 40 mg24.3
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 30 mg29.2
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 40 mg11.5

[back to top]

Duration of Clinical Benefit (DOCB)

DOCB was defined as time in months from the first evidence of confirmed assessment of sCR, CR, VGPR, PR or MR to first confirmed disease progression, or to death due to any cause. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, death or initiation of subsequent therapy (a maximum of 194.3 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 30 mg15.7
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 40 mg21.3
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 30 mg27.20
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 40 mg10.9

[back to top]

Clinical Benefit Rate (≥ Minimal Response)

≥ Minimal response for participants included sCR, CR, VGPR, PR and MR. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, death or initiation of subsequent therapy (a maximum of 194.3 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 30 mg86.7
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 40 mg75.0
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 30 mg83.3
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 40 mg74.1

[back to top]

Phase 1: Number of Participants Who Experienced a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

"Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03.~DLT criteria that apply to Regimens A and B:~Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity preventing the administration of > 1 dose of bortezomib or daratumumab during the 1st cycle.~Grade 4 or greater non-hematologic toxicity.~Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 25,000 cells/ mm^3) preventing the administration of > 1 dose of bortezomib or daratumumab during the 1st cycle or with clinically significant bleeding during the 1st cycle.~Grade 4 neutropenia (ANC < 500 cells/mm^3), lasting more than 7 days during the 1st cycle.~Greater than 14 days' delay to meet the criteria for the start of a new cycle (Cycle 2) due to toxicity." (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Cycle 1: Day 1 to Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Regimen A - Melflufen 30mg + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone0
Regimen A - Melflufen 40mg + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone0
Regimen B - Melflufen 30mg + Daratumumab + Dexamethasone0
Regimen B - Melflufen 40mg + Daratumumab + Dexamethasone0

[back to top]

Phase 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best confirmed response of Partial Response (PR) or better. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, death or initiation of subsequent therapy (a maximum of 194.3 weeks)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Regimen A - Melflufen 30mg + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone80
Regimen A - Melflufen 40mg + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone75
Regimen B - Melflufen 30mg + Daratumumab + Dexamethasone83.3
Regimen B - Melflufen 40mg + Daratumumab + Dexamethasone70.4

[back to top]

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time in months from date of initiation of therapy to the earlier of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, death or initiation of subsequent therapy (a maximum of 194.3 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 30 mg10.0
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 40 mg24.30
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 30 mg28.4
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 40 mg9.7

[back to top]

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined for participants with confirmed objective response (PR or better, which includes PR, VGPR, CR and sCR) as the time from the first documentation of objective response to the first documentation of objective progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT03481556)
Timeframe: Until disease progression, death or initiation of subsequent therapy (a maximum of 194.3 weeks)

Interventionmonths (Median)
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 30 mg9.0
A (Melflufen+Bortezomib+Dex) 40 mgNA
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 30 mg24.2
B (Melflufen+Daratumumab+Dex) 40 mg9.9

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experience Acute GvHD

Rate of acute GvHD post-transplant. All participants that received a transplant and received any prophylactic treatment will be included in the analysis. (NCT03945591)
Timeframe: Day 120 Post-Transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cyclophosphamide and Bortezomib38.46

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants Who Experience Moderate to Severe Chronic GvHD

Rate of chronic GvHD post-transplant. All participants that received a transplant and received any prophylactic treatment will be included in the analysis. (NCT03945591)
Timeframe: Day 365 Post-Transplant

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Cyclophosphamide and Bortezomib36.36

[back to top]