Page last updated: 2024-11-04

tazarotene

Description Research Excerpts Clinical Trials Roles Classes Pathways Study Profile Bioassays Related Drugs Related Conditions Protein Interactions Research Growth Market Indicators

Description

tazarotene: a topical acetylenic retinoid; a topical kerytolytic [Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine, extracted Dec-2023]

tazarotene : The ethyl ester of tazarotenic acid. A prodrug for tazarotenic acid, it is used for the treatment of psoriasis, acne, and sun-damaged skin. [Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Cross-References

ID SourceID
PubMed CID5381
CHEMBL ID1657
CHEBI ID32184
SCHEMBL ID3134
MeSH IDM0230113

Synonyms (112)

Synonym
BIDD:GT0293
AC-755
AB01274801-01
tazoral
suretin
fabior
agn-190168
avage
tazorac
zorac
ethyl 6-((4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-yl)ethynyl)nicotinate
agn 190168
c21h21no2s
3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, 6-((3,4-dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-2h-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)ethynyl)-, ethyl ester
ethyl 6-(2-(4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-yl)ethynyl)nicotinate
tazarotene
118292-40-3
tazarotenum
tazaroteno
CHEBI:32184 ,
ethyl 6-[(4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2h-thiochromen-6-yl)ethynyl]nicotinate
DB00799
avage (tn)
tazorac (tn)
D01132
fabior (tn)
tazarotene (jan/usan/inn)
NCGC00167525-01
FT-0652578
bdbm50265951
idp-123
CHEMBL1657 ,
ethyl 6-[2-(4,4-dimethyl-2,3-dihydrothiochromen-6-yl)ethynyl]pyridine-3-carboxylate
dtxcid3026691
cas-118292-40-3
tox21_112522
dtxsid5046691 ,
tazarotene [usan:inn:ban]
unii-81bdr9y8ps
81bdr9y8ps ,
zora
HY-15388
CS-1029
smr002096194
MLS003915630
BCP0726000163
NCGC00167525-03
tazarotene [orange book]
duobrii component tazarotene
tazarotene [mi]
tazarotene [jan]
tazarotene component of duobrii
tazarotene [inn]
tazarotene [who-dd]
tazarotene [usan]
idp-118 component tazarotene
tazarotene [mart.]
arazlo
tazarotene [vandf]
ethyl 6-[(4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-yl)ethynyl]nicotinate
tazarotene [inci]
6-(4,4-dimethyl-thiochroman-6-ylethynyl)-nicotinic acid ethyl ester
S1569
AKOS015902872
gtpl6952
ethyl 6-[2-(4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2h-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)ethynyl]pyridine-3-carboxylate
SCHEMBL3134
tox21_112522_1
NCGC00167525-02
BS-1012
ethyl 6-(2-(4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-yl)-ethynyl)nicotinate
ethyl 6-[2-(4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-yl)-ethynyl]nicotinate
ethyl 6-[2-(4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-yl)ethynyl]nicotinate
6-(4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-ylethynyl) nicotinic acid ethyl ester
6-[2-(3,4-dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-2h-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)ethynyl]-3-pyridinecarboxylicacidethylester
T3108
mfcd00867628
ethyl 6-[2-(4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-yl)ethynyl]pyridine-3-carboxylate
6-[2-(3,4-dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-2h-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)ethynyl]-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid ethyl ester
Q-102516
tox21 112522
ethyl 6-[(4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2h-thiochromen-6-yl)ethynyl]pyridine-3-carboxylate
acnitaz
AB01274801_02
sr-01000931253
SR-01000931253-2
HMS3655K05
SW220026-1
ethyl 6-((4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-yl)ethynyl)nicotinate;6-(4,4-dimethyl-thiochroman-6-ylethynyl)-nicotinic acid ethyl ester
agn190168, agn-190168
BCP22966
6-[2-(3,4-dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-2h-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)ethynyl]- 3-pyridinecarboxylic acid ethyl ester
Q3981685
tazarotene (avage)
tazarotene,(s)
AMY31169
HMS3747C19
HMS3747E19
CCG-268046
6-(2-(4,4-dimethyl-thiochroman-6yl)ethynyl)-nicotinic acid ethyl ester
A846572
(+/-)octahydrocyclopenta[b]pyrrole-2-carboxylicacidhydrochloride
SY053169
tazarotene- bio-x
BT164442
d05ax05
tazarotene cream
6-((3,4-dihydro-4,4-dimethyl-2h-1-benzothiopyran-6-yl)ethynyl)-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid, ethyl ester
ethyl 6-((4,4-dimethylthiochroman-6-yl)ethynyl)nicotinate
tazarotene (mart.)
ethyl 6-((4,4-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2h-thiochromen-6-yl)ethynyl)nicotinate
Z1424590960

Research Excerpts

Overview

Tazarotene is a prodrug that belongs to the acetylenic class of retinoids. It is a synthetic retinoid, with immunomodulating properties and anti-inflammatory activity. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating acne vulgaris in individuals 9 years of age and older.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tazarotene 0.045% lotion is an effective and well-tolerated retinoid recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating acne vulgaris in individuals 9 years of age and older."( Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion: A Novel Retinoid Formulation.
Feldman, SR; Mohney, LA; Singh, R, 2022
)
3.61
"Tazarotene is a prodrug that belongs to the acetylenic class of retinoids. "( Insights into the degradation chemistry of tazarotene, a third generation acetylenic retinoid: LC-HRMS (Orbitrap), LC-MS
Balhara, A; Giri, S; Sahu, A; Singh, DK; Singh, S, 2020
)
2.26
"Tazarotene is a synthetic retinoid, with immunomodulating properties and anti-inflammatory activity."( Comparative study between the effect of topical tazarotene 0.1 gel alone vs its combination with tioconazole nail paint in treatment of onychomycosis.
El-Salam, SSA; Mahmoud, MT; Omar, GA; Said, M, 2020
)
1.54
"Tazarotene is a recently discovered small molecule drug and functions to promote neovascularization and tissue repair."( Tazarotene-loaded PLGA nanoparticles potentiate deep tissue pressure injury healing via VEGF-Notch signaling.
Guo, J; Han, J; Liu, P; Si, R; Wang, A; Yang, X; Zhang, J; Zhang, Z; Zhao, M, 2020
)
2.72
"Tazarotene (TAZ) is a topical synthetic retinoid used in psoriasis treatment, however, it is extremely lipophilic and exhibits skin irritation. "( Novel antipsoriatic fluidized spanlastic nanovesicles: In vitro physicochemical characterization, ex vivo cutaneous retention and exploratory clinical therapeutic efficacy.
El-Gogary, RI; Elmowafy, E; Nasr, M; Ragai, MH, 2019
)
1.96
"Tazarotene foam, 0.1 % is an alternative to gel with less systemic exposure."( Tazarotene foam versus tazarotene gel: a randomized relative bioavailability study in acne vulgaris.
Alió Saenz, AB; Jarratt, M; Werner, CP, 2013
)
3.28
"Tazarotene is a synthetic retinoid that, depending on the concentration and vehicle, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris (AV) and plaque psoriasis. "( A status report on topical tazarotene in the management of acne vulgaris.
Del Rosso, JQ; Tanghetti, E, 2013
)
2.13
"Tazarotene is a topically-applied, receptor-selective retinoid that has been shown to modulate several major pathogenic factors of psoriasis. "( Periungual pyogenic granulomas due to topical tazarotene for nail psoriasis.
Patrizi, A; Piraccini, BM; Venturi, M, 2014
)
2.1
"Tazarotene is a topical retinoid available as a cream, gel and foam. "( Tazarotene foam, 0.1%, for the treatment of acne.
Feldman, SR; Hill, D; Narahari, S; Smith, JA, 2016
)
3.32
"Tazarotene is a new 3rd generation topical acetylenic retinoid. "( Topical tazarotene cream (0.1%) in the treatment of facial acne: an open clinical trial.
Choudhury, AM; Islam, MT; Paul, HK; Rahman, MA; Zakaria, AS, 2010
)
2.24
"Tazarotene is a receptor-selective retinoid, which is efficacious in the treatment of patients with psoriasis, acne vulgaris, and photoaging. "( Optimizing treatment with topical tazarotene.
Guenther, LC, 2003
)
2.04
"Tazarotene is an acetylenic retinoid which is metabolised to tazarotenic acid and which binds selectively to the retinoid receptors RARbeta and RARgamma. "( A phase 1 study of tazarotene in adults with advanced cancer.
Burnett, RD; Fainaru, I; Ganesan, TS; Harris, AL; Jones, PH; Nadolny, P; Rustin, GJ; Talbot, DC; Tang-Liu, D; Walker, P; Yu, Z, 2003
)
2.09
"Tazarotene is a retinoic acid receptor selective retinoid that upregulates a tumor suppressor, tazarotene-induced gene 3 (TIG-3), in keratinocytes and psoriasis."( Tazarotene-induced gene 3 is suppressed in basal cell carcinomas and reversed in vivo by tazarotene application.
Duvic, M; Hazarika, P; Herne, K; Joseph, A; Ni, X; Schulz, C; Sui, D; Talpur, R; Ward, S, 2003
)
2.48
"Tazarotene is a member of the new generation of receptor-selective, synthetic retinoids for the topical treatment of mild to moderate plaque psoriasis, acne vulgaris and photoaging. "( Tazarotene: therapeutic strategies in the treatment of psoriasis, acne and photoaging.
Korting, HC; Roeder, A; Schäfer-Korting, M; Schaller, M,
)
3.02
"Tazarotene is an alternative for vitamin D(3) treatment if this treatment fails."( Established treatments of psoriasis.
van de Kerkhof, PC; Vissers, WH, 2004
)
1.04
"Tazarotene is a prodrug selective for RARbeta/gamma, thereby motivating interest in determining whether tazarotene might activate putative tumor suppressor activity."( A retinoic acid receptor beta/gamma-selective prodrug (tazarotene) plus a retinoid X receptor ligand induces extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation, retinoblastoma hypophosphorylation, G0 arrest, and cell differentiation.
Chandraratna, R; Fenning, R; Varvayanis, S; Walker, P; Yen, A, 2004
)
1.29
"Tazarotene is a prodrug metabolized to tazarotenic acid that modulates cellular differentiation, desquamation, and inflammation."( Mechanisms of the comedolytic and anti-inflammatory properties of topical retinoids.
Bikowski, JB,
)
0.85
"Tazarotene (Tazorac) is a topical retinoid indicated for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. "( Topical tazarotene: a review of its use in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.
Dando, TM; Wellington, K, 2005
)
2.21
"Tazarotene is a topically applied retinoid that targets the skin, the site of the fundamental defect(s) in psoriasis, modulating the major causes of the disease and achieving sustained efficacy. "( Tazarotene--first of a new generation of receptor-selective retinoids.
Chandraratna, RA, 1996
)
3.18
"Tazarotene is a new topical retinoid which has proven to be efficacious in the treatment of mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis."( Safety, efficacy and duration of therapeutic effect of tazarotene used in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.
Weinstein, GD, 1996
)
1.26
"Tazarotene is a novel acetylenic retinoid for the treatment of psoriasis and acne. "( Metabolic deesterification of tazarotene in human blood and rat and human liver microsomes.
Baumgarten, V; Duff, S; Madhu, C; Rix, P; Small, D; Tang-Liu, D, 1997
)
2.03
"Tazarotene is a retinoic acid receptor-specific retinoid with demonstrated efficacy in the topical treatment of psoriasis."( Molecular mechanisms of tazarotene action in psoriasis.
Asano, AT; Chandraratna, RA; Duvic, M; Nagpal, S, 1997
)
1.33
"Tazarotene is a novel acetylenic retinoid undergoing clinical trials for the topical treatment of mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis."( Clinical safety of tazarotene in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.
Marks, R, 1997
)
1.35
"Tazarotene appears to be an effective addition to the currently available treatments for plaque psoriasis."( Tazarotene gel: efficacy and safety in plaque psoriasis.
Weinstein, GD, 1997
)
2.46
"Tazarotene (Tazorac) is a new vitamin A derivative and the first topical retinoid to demonstrate therapeutic success in treating plaque-type psoriasis."( New treatment options for psoriasis.
McClelland, PB, 1997
)
1.02
"Tazarotene is a topical retinoid that appears to exert its effects via retinoic acid receptors. "( Tazarotene.
Benfield, P; Brogden, RN; Foster, RH, 1998
)
3.19
"Tazarotene is a retinoid with properties that are a result of this rational approach to drug discovery."( Current research and future developments in retinoids: oral and topical agents.
Chandraratna, RA, 1998
)
1.02
"Tazarotene is a synthetic retinoid that is used in the clinic for the treatment of psoriasis."( Identification and characterization of a retinoid-induced class II tumor suppressor/growth regulatory gene.
Chandraratna, RA; Deucher, A; DiSepio, D; Duvic, M; Eckert, RL; Ghosn, C; Nagpal, S; Robinson, N, 1998
)
1.02
"Tazarotene (AGN 190168) is a new acetylenic retinoid which is effective for the topical treatment of patients with stable plaque psoriasis and mild to moderate acne vulgaris. "( Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism of tazarotene: a novel topical treatment for acne and psoriasis.
Matsumoto, RM; Tang-Liu, DD; Usansky, JI, 1999
)
2
"Tazarotene is an important addition to the therapeutic possibilities in Darier disease."( [Follicular dyskeratosis: successful treatment with local retinoid].
Altmeyer, P; Oster-Schmidt, C; Stücker, M, 2000
)
1.03
"Tazarotene is a pro-drug of tazarotenic acid, a receptor-selective retinoid, which has shown efficacy in the treatment of these disorders."( Topical tazarotene therapy for psoriasis, acne vulgaris, and photoaging.
Guenther, LC, 2002
)
1.47

Effects

Tazarotene 0.1% gel has comparable clinical efficacy to CCT 5% ointment. It has been shown to upregulate the tumor suppressor, tazarotene induced gene 3, which is overexpressed in psoriasis and skin cancer. Tazarotne has low systemic absorption after topical administration.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tazarotene has a rapid onset of action indicated by significant improvements as early as the first week of treatment."( Tazarotene gel: efficacy and safety in plaque psoriasis.
Weinstein, GD, 1997
)
2.46
"Tazarotene has also been shown to be effective in psoriasis, with efficacy maintained several weeks posttreatment."( Halobetasol 0.01%/Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Maintenance of Therapeutic Effect After Cessation of Therapy
, 2019
)
1.57
"Tazarotene has also been shown to be effective in psoriasis, with efficacy maintained several weeks posttreatment."( Halobetasol 0.01%/Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Maintenance of Therapeutic Effect After Cessation of Therapy.
Green, LJ; Lin, T; Pariser, DM; Pillai, R; Stein Gold, L; Sugarman, JL, 2018
)
1.54
"Tazarotene 0.1% gel has comparable clinical efficacy to CCT 5% ointment. "( Topical tazarotene vs. coal tar in stable plaque psoriasis.
De, D; Dogra, S; Kaur, I; Kumar, B; Kumar, U, 2010
)
2.24
"Tazarotene has been shown to upregulate the tumor suppressor, tazarotene induced gene 3, which is overexpressed in psoriasis and skin cancer."( Efficacy and safety of topical tazarotene: a review.
Cox, K; Duvic, M; Talpur, R, 2009
)
1.36
"Tazarotene has been proposed for the treatment of BCC; however, data on its efficacy are lacking."( Topical treatment of basal cell carcinoma with tazarotene: a clinicopathological study on a large series of cases.
Angeloni, C; Bianchi, L; Campione, E; Chimenti, S; Costanzo, A; Orlandi, A; Spagnoli, LG, 2004
)
1.3
"Tazarotene has low systemic absorption after topical administration."( Tazarotene: the first receptor-selective topical retinoid for the treatment of psoriasis.
Chandraratna, RA, 1997
)
2.46
"Tazarotene has a rapid onset of action indicated by significant improvements as early as the first week of treatment."( Tazarotene gel: efficacy and safety in plaque psoriasis.
Weinstein, GD, 1997
)
2.46
"Tazarotene has been demonstrated to be significantly more effective than vehicle, and comparable in efficacy to fluocinonide 0.05%, but with a more sustained therapeutic effect after treatment is stopped."( Clinical efficacy and safety of tazarotene: optimizing clinical results.
Lebwohl, M, 1998
)
1.31
"Tazarotene has been shown to be efficacious in plaque-type psoriasis."( Combination phototherapy of psoriasis with narrow-band UVB irradiation and topical tazarotene gel.
Behrens, S; Grundmann-Kollmann, M; Kerscher, M; Peter, RU; Schiener, R, 2000
)
1.25

Actions

Tazarotene may inhibit abnormal proliferation of keratinocytes through down-regulating PML gene expression in active psoriatic epidermis. It promotes healing of psoriatics lesions by modulating the key pathogenetic factors in this disease.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tazarotene may inhibit abnormal proliferation of keratinocytes through down-regulating PML gene expression in active psoriatic epidermis."( [Inhibition of promyelocytic leukemia gene by tazarotene in hyperproliferative epidermis of psoriasis].
Liu, P; Peng, ZH; Tan, SS; Wang, QY; Yan, HL, 2006
)
2.03
"Tazarotene promotes healing of psoriatic lesions by modulating the key pathogenetic factors in this disease."( Early clinical development of tazarotene.
Marks, R, 1996
)
1.3

Treatment

Tazarotene effectively treats mild-to-moderate plaque-type psoriasis. The benefits seem to be sustained after the cessation of therapy. Once-daily treatment is equally effective as more frequent application.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"Tazarotene treatment was associated with increased TIG-3 protein and mRNA expression in basal cell carcinomas compared to baseline levels (p < or = 0.001 and p = 0.028, respectively)."( Tazarotene-induced gene 3 is suppressed in basal cell carcinomas and reversed in vivo by tazarotene application.
Duvic, M; Hazarika, P; Herne, K; Joseph, A; Ni, X; Schulz, C; Sui, D; Talpur, R; Ward, S, 2003
)
2.48
"Tazarotene treatment was associated with significant irritation, causing its discontinuation in one third of patients."( Randomized double-blind trial of prophylactic oral minocycline and topical tazarotene for cetuximab-associated acne-like eruption.
Agero, AL; Dusza, SW; Halpern, AC; Kemeny, NE; Lieb, JA; Myskowski, PL; Saltz, L; Scope, A, 2007
)
1.29
"Tazarotene effectively treats mild-to-moderate plaque-type psoriasis, the benefits seem to be sustained after the cessation of therapy, and once-daily treatment is equally effective as more frequent application."( Early clinical development of tazarotene.
Marks, R, 1996
)
1.3
"The tazarotene-UVB treatment was well tolerated, and no phototoxicity was observed."( Tazarotene in combination with phototherapy.
Koo, JY, 1998
)
2.22
"Tazarotene treatment increases TIG3 expression in primary human keratinocytes and in vivo in psoriatic lesions."( Identification and characterization of a retinoid-induced class II tumor suppressor/growth regulatory gene.
Chandraratna, RA; Deucher, A; DiSepio, D; Duvic, M; Eckert, RL; Ghosn, C; Nagpal, S; Robinson, N, 1998
)
1.02
"The tazarotene treatment resulted in a significantly greater reduction in onycholysis in occluded nails (P < or = .05 at weeks 4 and 12) and a significantly greater reduction in onycholysis in nonoccluded nails (P < or = .05 at week 24)."( Tazarotene 0.1% gel in the treatment of fingernail psoriasis: a double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study.
Scher, RK; Stiller, M; Zhu, YI, 2001
)
2.23
"Tazarotene treatment was associated with a significantly greater incidence of treatment success (defined as > or = 50% global improvement [67% vs 49%; P=.03]) and significantly greater reductions in overall disease severity (36% vs 26%; P=.02) and noninflammatory lesion count (60% vs 38% at week 12; P=.02) than tretinoin microsponge treatment."( Once-daily tazarotene 0.1 % gel versus once-daily tretinoin 0.1 % microsponge gel for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris: a double-blind randomized trial.
Berson, D; Lee, J; Leyden, JJ; Miller, B; Tanghetti, EA; Ung, M, 2002
)
1.43
"Treatment with tazarotene lotion 0.045% was well-tolerated, with erythema, dryness, peeling, oiliness, pruritis, and burning generally rated as trace or mild."( Efficacy and Safety of Tazarotene Lotion, 0.045% in the Treatment of Truncal Acne Vulgaris.
Kircik, L, 2022
)
1.37
"Treatment with tazarotene resulted in uniform reduction of plaque elevation and was not associated with the development of hot spots."( Comparison of clinical efficacy of topical tazarotene 0.1% cream with topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream in chronic plaque psoriasis: a double-blind, randomized, right-left comparison study.
Angelo, JS; Kar, BR; Thomas, J,
)
0.73
"Treatment with tazarotene offers an opportunity to reduce the cost of care for patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis and enhance patient satisfaction by gaining more disease-free days."( A pharmacoeconomic analysis of topical therapies for patients with mild-to-moderate stable plaque psoriasis: a US study.
An, P; LaPensee, K; Marchetti, A,
)
0.47
"Pretreatment with tazarotene 0.1% gel 3 times per week for 2 weeks before phototherapy significantly reduced the mean minimal erythema dose (MED) for UVB from 56.25 to 42.50 mJ/cm(2) (P <.01), and significantly reduced the mean UVA exposure required to induce immediate pigment darkening from 20.18 to 18.50 J/cm(2) (P <.05)."( Interactions between tazarotene and ultraviolet light.
Hecker, D; Kuroda, K; Lebwohl, M; Worsley, J; Yueh, G, 1999
)
0.95

Toxicity

Once-daily tazarotene was effective and safe as a topical monotherapy for plaque psoriasis. Treatment-related systemic adverse effects were not observed in clinical trials.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" Disadvantages of currently available therapies include lack of short-term efficacy and long-term maintenance, adverse effects, and cosmetic problems."( Safety, efficacy and duration of therapeutic effect of tazarotene used in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.
Weinstein, GD, 1996
)
0.54
"Once-daily tazarotene was effective and safe as a topical monotherapy for plaque psoriasis, providing rapid reduction of signs and symptoms."( Tazarotene gel, a new retinoid, for topical therapy of psoriasis: vehicle-controlled study of safety, efficacy, and duration of therapeutic effect.
Chandraratna, RA; Duvic, M; Friedman, DJ; Gibson, JR; Jegasothy, BV; Jorizzo, JL; Krueger, GG; Lew-Kaya, DA; Lowe, NJ; Lue, JC; Sefton, J; Shmunes, E; Tschen, EH; Weinstein, GD, 1997
)
2.13
" Tazarotene is generally well tolerated, with adverse events limited to local irritation."( Tazarotene gel: efficacy and safety in plaque psoriasis.
Weinstein, GD, 1997
)
2.65
" Treatment-related adverse effects were generally limited to mild or moderate local irritation and were less frequent with the treatment regimen administered once daily."( The safety and efficacy of tazarotene gel, a topical acetylenic retinoid, in the treatment of psoriasis.
Chandraratna, RA; Drake, LA; Elias, PM; Guzzo, C; Krueger, GG; Lew-Kaya, DA; Lowe, NJ; Lue, JC; Sefton, J; Weinstein, GD, 1998
)
0.6
" Its adverse effects consist primarily of mild to moderate local irritation with no reports of treatment-related systemic adverse effects."( Clinical efficacy and safety of tazarotene: optimizing clinical results.
Lebwohl, M, 1998
)
0.58
" Limited systemic exposure to the drug also ensures that any adverse effects are local effects rather than systemic effects."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of tazarotene.
Menter, A, 2000
)
0.59
"In the treatment of plaque psoriasis with corticosteroids, long-term efficacy and safety are often compromised by tachyphylaxis, steroid rebound, and adverse effects."( Strategies to optimize efficacy, duration of remission, and safety in the treatment of plaque psoriasis by using tazarotene in combination with a corticosteroid.
Lebwohl, M, 2000
)
0.52
" Our purpose is to compare the rates of adverse events associated with different topical psoriasis treatments."( A systematic review of adverse effects associated with topical treatments for psoriasis.
Bruner, CR; Feldman, SR; Fleischer, AB; Ventrapragada, M, 2003
)
0.32
" Common adverse events included signs and symptoms of skin irritation."( Tazarotene cream in the treatment of psoriasis: Two multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies of the safety and efficacy of tazarotene creams 0.05% and 0.1% applied once daily for 12 weeks.
Gibson, JR; Koo, JY; Krueger, GG; Lebwohl, MG; Lew-Kaya, DA; Lowe, NJ; Menter, MA; Sefton, J; Walker, PS; Weinstein, GD, 2003
)
1.76
"Tazarotene creams were associated with significant reductions in the severity of the clinical signs of psoriasis and were found to be safe with acceptable tolerability."( Tazarotene cream in the treatment of psoriasis: Two multicenter, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies of the safety and efficacy of tazarotene creams 0.05% and 0.1% applied once daily for 12 weeks.
Gibson, JR; Koo, JY; Krueger, GG; Lebwohl, MG; Lew-Kaya, DA; Lowe, NJ; Menter, MA; Sefton, J; Walker, PS; Weinstein, GD, 2003
)
3.2
"5 million adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports for 8620 drugs/biologics that are listed for 1191 Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction (COSTAR) terms of adverse effects."( Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
Benz, RD; Contrera, JF; Kruhlak, NL; Matthews, EJ; Weaver, JL, 2004
)
0.32
" Local adverse effects, including erythema, dryness, itching, and stinging, occur frequently during the early treatment phase."( Topical retinoids in acne vulgaris: update on efficacy and safety.
Gollnick, H; Thielitz, A, 2008
)
0.35
" Adverse effects are limited to mild to moderate local irritation and erythema as seen with the 'retinization period' of other topical retinoid therapies."( Efficacy and safety of topical tazarotene: a review.
Cox, K; Duvic, M; Talpur, R, 2009
)
0.64
" Safety and treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated throughout."( A Phase 2, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle Controlled Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Halobetasol/Tazarotene Fixed Combination in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis.
Alexander, BJ; Gold, LS; Lebwohl, MG; Pariser, DM; Pillai, R; Sugarman, JL, 2017
)
0.66
" Safety and treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated throughout."( Safety and efficacy of a fixed combination of halobetasol and tazarotene in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Results of 2 phase 3 randomized controlled trials.
Gold, LS; Israel, R; Lebwohl, MG; Lin, T; Martin, G; Pariser, DM; Pillai, R; Ramakrishna, T; Sugarman, JL, 2018
)
0.72
" The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were contact dermatitis (6."( Safety and efficacy of a fixed combination of halobetasol and tazarotene in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Results of 2 phase 3 randomized controlled trials.
Gold, LS; Israel, R; Lebwohl, MG; Lin, T; Martin, G; Pariser, DM; Pillai, R; Ramakrishna, T; Sugarman, JL, 2018
)
0.72
" The most common side effect is mild-to-moderate local irritation, which limited its role as a single agent for psoriasis."( Tazarotene Revisited: Safety and Efficacy in Plaque Psoriasis and Its Emerging Role in Treatment Strategy
Lebwohl, M; Stein Gold, L; Tanghetti, E, 2018
)
1.92
" Safety and treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated throughout."( Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of a Halobetasol 0.01% /Tazarotene 0.045% Fixed Combination in the Treatment of Severe Localized Plaque Psoriasis: Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials
Israel, R; Lebwohl, MG; Lin, T; Stein Gold, L; Sugarman, JL, 2019
)
0.76
" The most common treatment-related adverse events were application site reactions of dermatitis, pruritus, pain and irritation."( Long-term safety and efficacy of a fixed-combination halobetasol propionate 0.01%/tazarotene 0.045% lotion in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: phase 3 open-label study.
Han, G; Harris, S; Jacobson, A; Lebwohl, MG; Lin, T; Papp, K; Pariser, DM; Stein Gold, L, 2021
)
0.85
" Quality of life, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and cutaneous safety/tolerability were also assessed."( Efficacy and Safety of Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion in Caucasian Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Acne.
Callender, V; Cook-Bolden, F; Del Rosso, J; Draelos, Z; Guenin, E; Stein Gold, L; Tyring, S; Werschler, W; Zeichner, J, 2022
)
1.03

Pharmacokinetics

The pharmacokinetic profile of tazarotene helps to ensure that systemic exposure to the drug and its metabolites is minimal.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The pharmacokinetic profile of tazarotene helps to ensure that systemic exposure to the drug and its metabolites is minimal."( Pharmacokinetics and safety of tazarotene.
Menter, A, 2000
)
0.88
"Two separate, randomised, single-centre, nonblinded, parallel-group pharmacokinetic studies were conducted."( Pharmacokinetics of tazarotene cream 0.1% after a single dose and after repeat topical applications at clinical or exaggerated application rates in patients with acne vulgaris or photodamaged skin.
Lew-Kaya, D; Sefton, J; Tang-Liu, DD; Walker, P; Yu, D; Yu, Z, 2003
)
0.64
"Two separate open-label, parallel-group, single-centre, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies."( Tazarotene does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a norethindrone/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive.
Tang-Liu, DD; Walker, PS; Yu, D; Yu, Z, 2004
)
1.77
" Pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma norethindrone and ethinylestradiol were compared before and after tazarotene administration (cycle day 6 of the second and third cycles, respectively)."( Tazarotene does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a norethindrone/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive.
Tang-Liu, DD; Walker, PS; Yu, D; Yu, Z, 2004
)
1.98
"1 mg), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 24 hours (AUC24) and the peak concentration in plasma (Cmax) for tazarotenic acid were 121 +/- 27 microg."( Tazarotene does not affect the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a norethindrone/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptive.
Tang-Liu, DD; Walker, PS; Yu, D; Yu, Z, 2004
)
1.77

Compound-Compound Interactions

Tazarotene in combination with a topical corticosteroid has theoretic appeal. Each drug has a different mechanism of action, and it is likely that combination therapy will offer additive or synergistic effects. The study was designed to investigate drug-drug interaction in a new combination cream.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
"The use of a topical corticosteroid in combination with tazarotene has theoretic appeal because each drug has a different mechanism of action, and it is therefore likely that combination therapy will offer additive or synergistic effects."( Tazarotene in combination with topical corticosteroids.
Lebwohl, M; Poulin, Y, 1998
)
1.99
"1% gel once daily, followed by tazarotene plus UVB therapy (tazarotene-UVB) 3 times per week for 10 weeks, was more effective than UVB therapy alone or in combination with vehicle gel in reducing plaque elevation, scaling, and erythema."( Tazarotene in combination with phototherapy.
Koo, JY, 1998
)
2.03
"05% monotherapy, and were higher still when tazarotene was used in combination with mometasone furoate."( Tazarotene 0.1% gel in combination with mometasone furoate cream in plaque psoriasis: a photographic tracking study.
Poulin, YP, 1999
)
2.01
"Phototherapy is often used in combination with other antipsoriatic treatments in an attempt to improve efficacy and reduce patients' cumulative exposure to radiation."( Optimizing therapy: tazarotene in combination with phototherapy.
Lowe, NJ, 1999
)
0.63
" When valproic acid is combined with tazarotene or isotretinoin, it does not change their photocarcinogenicity significantly."( Photocarcinogenesis of topical tazarotene and isotretinoin alone and in combination with valproic acid in hairless mice.
Lerche, CM; Philipsen, PA; Sehested, M; Wulf, HC, 2008
)
0.9
" The results suggest that anti-inflammatory agents such as dapsone can effectively treat early stages of acne (both comedonal and noncomedonal) when used in combination with a retinoid."( Clinical evidence for the role of a topical anti-inflammatory agent in comedonal acne: findings from a randomized study of dapsone gel 5% in combination with tazarotene cream 0.1% in patients with acne vulgaris.
Dhawan, S; Downie, J; Draelos, Z; Germain, MA; Green, L; Kasteler, JS; Kircik, L; Ling, M; Oefelein, MG; Tanghetti, E, 2011
)
0.57
" The present study was designed to investigate drug-drug interaction in a new combination cream which contains both tazarotene (TZRT) and betamethasone dipropionate (BTMSDP) by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) behaviors of TZRT, BTMSDP, and their major metabolites, tazarotenic acid (TZRTAC) and betamethasone (BTMS) with those in the commonly prescribed TZRT gel and BTMSDP cream."( Evaluation of change in the skin concentration of tazarotene and betamethasone dipropionate based on drug-drug interaction for transdermal drug delivery in miniature pig.
Chen, D; Ma, P; Yang, J; Yu, B; Yuan, L, 2015
)
0.88
"1% gel alone in comparison with its combination with tioconazole nail paint in the treatment of onychomycosis."( Comparative study between the effect of topical tazarotene 0.1 gel alone vs its combination with tioconazole nail paint in treatment of onychomycosis.
El-Salam, SSA; Mahmoud, MT; Omar, GA; Said, M, 2020
)
0.81

Bioavailability

Study used poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) as nanoparticle carriers loaded with tazarotene (Ta/PLGA NPs) to overcome shortcomings associated with the low water solubility, short half-life, easy photolysis and low bioavailability.

ExcerptReferenceRelevance
" The systemic bioavailability of tazarotene (measured as tazarotenic acid) is low, approximately 1% after single and multiple topical applications to healthy skin."( Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism of tazarotene: a novel topical treatment for acne and psoriasis.
Matsumoto, RM; Tang-Liu, DD; Usansky, JI, 1999
)
0.84
" Topical administration of acitretin may lessen the risk of systemic toxicity while increasing local bioavailability in the skin."( Effects of topically applied acitretin in reconstructed human epidermis and the rhino mouse.
Chern, WH; Hofland, HE; Houlden, RJ; Hsia, E; Johnston, MJ, 2008
)
0.35
" This single-centre, randomized, open-label study assessed relative bioavailability of its active metabolite tazarotenic acid after dosing of tazarotene foam or gel."( Tazarotene foam versus tazarotene gel: a randomized relative bioavailability study in acne vulgaris.
Alió Saenz, AB; Jarratt, M; Werner, CP, 2013
)
2.03
"The ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is known to limit both brain penetration and oral bioavailability of many chemotherapy drugs."( A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
Ambudkar, SV; Brimacombe, KR; Chen, L; Gottesman, MM; Guha, R; Hall, MD; Klumpp-Thomas, C; Lee, OW; Lee, TD; Lusvarghi, S; Robey, RW; Shen, M; Tebase, BG, 2019
)
0.51
" This study used poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) as nanoparticle carriers loaded with tazarotene (Ta/PLGA NPs) for drug delivery and to overcome shortcomings associated with the low water solubility, short half-life, easy photolysis and low bioavailability of tazarotene itself."( Tazarotene-loaded PLGA nanoparticles potentiate deep tissue pressure injury healing via VEGF-Notch signaling.
Guo, J; Han, J; Liu, P; Si, R; Wang, A; Yang, X; Zhang, J; Zhang, Z; Zhao, M, 2020
)
2.22

Dosage Studied

The single-centre, randomized, open-label study assessed relative bioavailability of its active metabolite tazarotenic acid. Dose-response studies showed that diminishing tazarotene progressively diminished both induced cell differentiation and G0 arrest.

ExcerptRelevanceReference
" Finally, a dose-response study showed that the de novo appearance of K4 can be utilized as a sensitive test for retinoid bioactivity in epidermis in vivo."( Keratin 4 upregulation by retinoic acid in vivo: a sensitive marker for retinoid bioactivity in human epidermis.
Törmä, H; Vahlquist, A; Virtanen, M, 2000
)
0.31
" Plasma concentrations of tazarotenic acid were found to peak rapidly within 1-3 h of dosing and thereafter declined quickly."( A phase 1 study of tazarotene in adults with advanced cancer.
Burnett, RD; Fainaru, I; Ganesan, TS; Harris, AL; Jones, PH; Nadolny, P; Rustin, GJ; Talbot, DC; Tang-Liu, D; Walker, P; Yu, Z, 2003
)
0.65
" Dose-response studies showed that diminishing tazarotene progressively diminished both induced cell differentiation and G0 arrest, where the doses for cellular effects were consistent with the transcriptional transactivation data."( A retinoic acid receptor beta/gamma-selective prodrug (tazarotene) plus a retinoid X receptor ligand induces extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation, retinoblastoma hypophosphorylation, G0 arrest, and cell differentiation.
Chandraratna, R; Fenning, R; Varvayanis, S; Walker, P; Yen, A, 2004
)
0.83
" A dose-response relationship was evident for both effectiveness and skin irritation."( Interventions for photodamaged skin.
Brooke, RC; Griffiths, CE; Hollis, S; Samuel, M, 2005
)
0.33
" This single-centre, randomized, open-label study assessed relative bioavailability of its active metabolite tazarotenic acid after dosing of tazarotene foam or gel."( Tazarotene foam versus tazarotene gel: a randomized relative bioavailability study in acne vulgaris.
Alió Saenz, AB; Jarratt, M; Werner, CP, 2013
)
2.03
" Accumulation was observed upon repeated dosing with steady-state conditions achieved at day 20."( Tazarotene foam versus tazarotene gel: a randomized relative bioavailability study in acne vulgaris.
Alió Saenz, AB; Jarratt, M; Werner, CP, 2013
)
1.83
" Moreover, the TZR is required alternative methods for routine quality control and to estimate TZR in pharmaceutical dosage form especially in pharmacokinetic studies of topical preparation."( Review on Characteristics and Analytical Methods of Tazarotene: An Update.
Gaikwad, J; Hatware, KV; Sharma, S, 2020
)
0.81
" No method has been reported so far for the simultaneous estimation of BV and TZ in topical dosage forms."( UV spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of betamethasone valerate and tazarotene with absorption factor method: Application for in-vitro and ex-vivo characterization of lipidic nanocarriers for topical delivery.
Dubey, SK; Gorantla, S; Mahmood, A; Rapalli, VK; Saha, RN; Singhvi, G; Waghule, T, 2020
)
0.78
[information is derived through text-mining from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Roles (3)

RoleDescription
keratolytic drugA drug that softens, separates, and causes desquamation of the cornified epithelium or horny layer of skin. Keratolytic drugs are used to expose mycelia of infecting fungi or to treat corns, warts, and certain other skin diseases.
prodrugA compound that, on administration, must undergo chemical conversion by metabolic processes before becoming the pharmacologically active drug for which it is a prodrug.
teratogenic agentA role played by a chemical compound in biological systems with adverse consequences in embryo developments, leading to birth defects, embryo death or altered development, growth retardation and functional defect.
[role information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Drug Classes (5)

ClassDescription
retinoidOxygenated derivatives of 3,7-dimethyl-1-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enyl)nona-1,3,5,7-tetraene and derivatives thereof.
thiochromaneAny organic heterobicyclic compound consisting of a benzene ring fused to a thiopyran.
pyridinesAny organonitrogen heterocyclic compound based on a pyridine skeleton and its substituted derivatives.
acetylenic compoundAny organic molecule containing a C#C bond.
ethyl esterAny carboxylic ester resulting from the formal condensation of the carboxy group of a carboxylic acid with ethanol.
[compound class information is derived from Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), Hastings J, Owen G, Dekker A, Ennis M, Kale N, Muthukrishnan V, Turner S, Swainston N, Mendes P, Steinbeck C. (2016). ChEBI in 2016: Improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res]

Protein Targets (40)

Potency Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverage (µ)Min (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
acetylcholinesteraseHomo sapiens (human)Potency3.89020.002541.796015,848.9004AID1347398
RAR-related orphan receptor gammaMus musculus (house mouse)Potency0.74980.006038.004119,952.5996AID1159521
SMAD family member 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency24.49010.173734.304761.8120AID1346859; AID1347035
USP1 protein, partialHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.38720.031637.5844354.8130AID504865
SMAD family member 3Homo sapiens (human)Potency24.49010.173734.304761.8120AID1346859; AID1347035
TDP1 proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency5.46400.000811.382244.6684AID686978; AID686979
AR proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency31.27180.000221.22318,912.5098AID1259243; AID1259247; AID743036
progesterone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.000417.946075.1148AID1346784
cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A polypeptide 4Homo sapiens (human)Potency10.96400.01237.983543.2770AID1645841
EWS/FLI fusion proteinHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.01480.001310.157742.8575AID1259256
retinoic acid nuclear receptor alpha variant 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.68740.003041.611522,387.1992AID1159552; AID1159553; AID1159555
retinoid X nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.26170.000817.505159.3239AID1159527; AID1159531
estrogen-related nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency22.85060.001530.607315,848.9004AID1224848; AID1224849; AID1259403
farnesoid X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency25.44030.375827.485161.6524AID743217; AID743220; AID743239
pregnane X nuclear receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.49150.005428.02631,258.9301AID1346982
estrogen nuclear receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)Potency9.99120.000229.305416,493.5996AID1259244; AID1259248; AID743069; AID743075; AID743078; AID743080; AID743091
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor deltaHomo sapiens (human)Potency29.84700.001024.504861.6448AID743212; AID743215; AID743227
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gammaHomo sapiens (human)Potency20.06290.001019.414170.9645AID743094; AID743191
vitamin D (1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency11.88230.023723.228263.5986AID743222
euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2Homo sapiens (human)Potency3.16230.035520.977089.1251AID504332
cytochrome P450, family 19, subfamily A, polypeptide 1, isoform CRA_aHomo sapiens (human)Potency0.04730.001723.839378.1014AID743083
thyroid stimulating hormone receptorHomo sapiens (human)Potency26.60320.001628.015177.1139AID1224843; AID1224895
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group I, member 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency10.00000.10009.191631.6228AID1346983
Histone H2A.xCricetulus griseus (Chinese hamster)Potency49.19400.039147.5451146.8240AID1224845
potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2 isoform dHomo sapiens (human)Potency8.91250.01789.637444.6684AID588834
thyroid hormone receptor beta isoform 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.09190.000323.4451159.6830AID743065; AID743067
histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2A isoform 2 precursorHomo sapiens (human)Potency35.48130.010323.856763.0957AID2662
nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 isoform 1Homo sapiens (human)Potency26.60110.000627.21521,122.0200AID743202; AID743219
gemininHomo sapiens (human)Potency33.49830.004611.374133.4983AID624296; AID624297
peripheral myelin protein 22Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency2.81980.005612.367736.1254AID624032; AID624044
Voltage-dependent calcium channel gamma-2 subunitMus musculus (house mouse)Potency0.02980.001557.789015,848.9004AID1259244
Cellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)Potency29.84930.002319.595674.0614AID651631; AID720552
Glutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)Potency0.02980.001551.739315,848.9004AID1259244
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Inhibition Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.63154.45319.3000AID1473740
Multidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.20005.677410.0000AID1473741
Bile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00000.11007.190310.0000AID1473738
Canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)IC50 (µMol)133.00002.41006.343310.0000AID1473739
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Activation Measurements

ProteinTaxonomyMeasurementAverageMin (ref.)Avg (ref.)Max (ref.)Bioassay(s)
Retinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.06300.00020.17902.5119AID396775
Retinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.00080.00030.23116.9000AID396777
Retinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)EC50 (µMol)0.04000.00020.06130.6480AID392142
[prepared from compound, protein, and bioassay information from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Biological Processes (229)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
xenobiotic metabolic processATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin secretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cilium assemblyMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet degranulationMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
cAMP transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
export across plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transportMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
fatty acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid biosynthetic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to oxidative stressBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to organic cyclic compoundBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
protein ubiquitinationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidationBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid signaling pathwayBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cholesterol homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to estrogenBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
lipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
phospholipid homeostasisBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bile acid secretionBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of bile acid metabolic processBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ER overload responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
in utero embryonic developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
somitogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell proliferation involved in immune responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
B cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell lineage commitmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to ischemiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleotide-excision repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
double-strand break repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein import into nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
autophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage responseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in cell cycle arrestCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
Ras protein signal transductionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
gastrulationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of neuroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein localizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA replicationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
determination of adult lifespanCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
rRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to salt stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to inorganic substanceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to X-rayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cardiac muscle cell apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
viral processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cerebellum developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitotic G1 DNA damage checkpoint signalingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomeraseCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
T cell differentiation in thymusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of tissue remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UVCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to glucose starvationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to DNA damage by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
entrainment of circadian clock by photoperiodCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial DNA repairCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription initiation-coupled chromatin remodelingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of proteolysisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of RNA polymerase II transcription preinitiation complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IICellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
response to antibioticCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of fibroblast proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
circadian behaviorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
bone marrow developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic organ developmentCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of peptidyl-tyrosine phosphorylationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein stabilizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of helicase activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein tetramerizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromosome organizationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
neuron apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell cycleCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
hematopoietic stem cell differentiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glial cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
type II interferon-mediated signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cardiac septum morphogenesisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed necrotic cell deathCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex assemblyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to endoplasmic reticulum stressCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of thymocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
necroptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to xenobiotic stimulusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to ionizing radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to gamma radiationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to UV-CCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
signal transduction by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to actinomycin DCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of release of cytochrome c from mitochondriaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replicative senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oxidative stress-induced premature senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
oligodendrocyte apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of execution phase of apoptosisCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of mitophagyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeability involved in apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediatorCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of miRNA transcriptionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of G1 to G0 transitionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA processingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of glucose catabolic process to lactate via pyruvateCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of pentose-phosphate shuntCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in response to hypoxiaCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of fibroblast apoptotic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic processCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cellular senescenceCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ureteric bud developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
neural tube closureRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
liver developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
glandular epithelial cell developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
growth plate cartilage developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein phosphorylationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
germ cell developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
female pregnancyRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of translationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
hippocampus developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
prostate gland developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of granulocyte differentiationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic camera-type eye developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of myelinationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to estradiolRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to retinoic acidRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of type II interferon productionRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of tumor necrosis factor productionRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-13 productionRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-4 productionRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of interleukin-5 productionRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to vitamin ARetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to cytokineRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
mRNA transcription by RNA polymerase IIRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of apoptotic processRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic cell clearanceRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
response to ethanolRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of T-helper 2 cell differentiationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of neuron differentiationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell cycleRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcriptionRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of synaptic plasticityRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid receptor signaling pathwayRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell differentiationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
Sertoli cell fate commitmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
limb developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
face developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
trachea cartilage developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
chondroblast differentiationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cartilage developmentRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to lipopolysaccharideRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to retinoic acidRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cellular response to estrogen stimulusRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of miRNA transcriptionRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
hormone-mediated signaling pathwayRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
ureteric bud developmentRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
glandular epithelial cell developmentRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
growth plate cartilage developmentRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
signal transductionRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
striatum developmentRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
neurogenesisRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
regulation of myelinationRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of chondrocyte differentiationRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic hindlimb morphogenesisRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic eye morphogenesisRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
embryonic digestive tract developmentRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
ventricular cardiac muscle cell differentiationRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
neural precursor cell proliferationRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid receptor signaling pathwayRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
hormone-mediated signaling pathwayRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
neural tube closureRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
glandular epithelial cell developmentRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
growth plate cartilage chondrocyte growthRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
apoptotic processRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of cell population proliferationRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of cell population proliferationRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of cell sizeRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
anterior/posterior pattern specificationRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of gene expressionRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic camera-type eye developmentRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of myelinationRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of chondrocyte differentiationRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
response to retinoic acidRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic hindlimb morphogenesisRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
multicellular organism growthRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of apoptotic processRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of programmed cell deathRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
regulation of myeloid cell differentiationRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
positive regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase IIRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
embryonic eye morphogenesisRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid receptor signaling pathwayRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
canonical Wnt signaling pathwayRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
face developmentRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
trachea cartilage developmentRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
prostate gland epithelium morphogenesisRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
Harderian gland developmentRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to retinoic acidRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
stem cell proliferationRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
cellular response to leukemia inhibitory factorRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of stem cell proliferationRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
cell differentiationRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
hormone-mediated signaling pathwayRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic metabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
negative regulation of gene expressionCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bile acid and bile salt transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
heme catabolic processCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic export from cellCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transepithelial transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
leukotriene transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
monoatomic anion transmembrane transportCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transport across blood-brain barrierCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Molecular Functions (75)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
ATP bindingATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
glucuronoside transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
icosanoid transmembrane transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
guanine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
prostaglandin transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
urate transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
purine nucleotide transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
efflux transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (NAD+) activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
glutathione transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
canalicular bile acid transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ABC-type bile acid transporter activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
transcription cis-regulatory region bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
core promoter sequence-specific DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
TFIID-class transcription factor complex bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription activator activity, RNA polymerase II-specificCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protease bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
p53 bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA 3'-UTR bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
copper ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
receptor tyrosine kinase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ubiquitin protein ligase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase regulator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
ATP-dependent DNA/DNA annealing activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
identical protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein heterodimerization activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-folding chaperone bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein phosphatase 2A bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II-specific DNA-binding transcription factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
14-3-3 protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
MDM2/MDM4 family protein bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
disordered domain specific bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
general transcription initiation factor bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
molecular function activator activityCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
promoter-specific chromatin bindingCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mRNA regulatory element binding translation repressor activityRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription repressor activityRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
transcription coactivator bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
signaling receptor bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
enzyme bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein domain specific bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
chromatin DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
histone deacetylase bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase B bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
retinoic acid-responsive element bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
mRNA 5'-UTR bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein kinase A bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
alpha-actinin bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
heterocyclic compound bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complex bindingRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear retinoid X receptor bindingRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
heterocyclic compound bindingRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specificRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
chromatin bindingRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
DNA-binding transcription factor activityRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
zinc ion bindingRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear retinoid X receptor bindingRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
sequence-specific double-stranded DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear receptor activityRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA bindingRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
protein bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP bindingCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
organic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type xenobiotic transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
bilirubin transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type glutathione S-conjugate transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATP hydrolysis activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ATPase-coupled inorganic anion transmembrane transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
ABC-type transporter activityCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Ceullar Components (39)

Processvia Protein(s)Taxonomy
plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basal plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
membraneATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 3Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
Golgi apparatusMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
platelet dense granule membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
external side of apical plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneMultidrug resistance-associated protein 4Homo sapiens (human)
basolateral plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
Golgi membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
intracellular canaliculusBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
recycling endosome membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
extracellular exosomeBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
membraneBile salt export pumpHomo sapiens (human)
nuclear bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
replication forkCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleolusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrionCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
mitochondrial matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
endoplasmic reticulumCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
centrosomeCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
cytosolCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nuclear matrixCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
PML bodyCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription repressor complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
site of double-strand breakCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
germ cell nucleusCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexCellular tumor antigen p53Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleolusRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
cytosolRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
actin cytoskeletonRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
dendriteRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
perinuclear region of cytoplasmRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
RNA polymerase II transcription regulator complexRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
protein-containing complexRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusRetinoic acid receptor alphaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
chromatinRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusRetinoic acid receptor betaHomo sapiens (human)
nucleusRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
nucleoplasmRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
cytoplasmRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
membraneRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
chromatinRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
transcription regulator complexRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
nucleusRetinoic acid receptor gamma Homo sapiens (human)
plasma membraneGlutamate receptor 2Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat)
plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
cell surfaceCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
intercellular canaliculusCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
apical plasma membraneCanalicular multispecific organic anion transporter 1Homo sapiens (human)
[Information is prepared from geneontology information from the June-17-2024 release]

Bioassays (88)

Assay IDTitleYearJournalArticle
AID1508630Primary qHTS for small molecule stabilizers of the endoplasmic reticulum resident proteome: Secreted ER Calcium Modulated Protein (SERCaMP) assay2021Cell reports, 04-27, Volume: 35, Issue:4
A target-agnostic screen identifies approved drugs to stabilize the endoplasmic reticulum-resident proteome.
AID1347093qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347121qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346987P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-8-5-11 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347104qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1296008Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening2020SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 01, Volume: 25, Issue:1
Cytotoxic Profiling of Annotated and Diverse Chemical Libraries Using Quantitative High-Throughput Screening.
AID1347096qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347116qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347092qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for A673 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347095qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347112qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347086qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Arenaviruses (LCMV): LCMV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347100qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347094qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347091qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SJ-GBM2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347125qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347128qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347101qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for BT-12 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347111qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-MC cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347098qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347117qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for BT-37 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347106qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for control Hh wild type fibroblast cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347122qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for U-2 OS cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347099qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347110qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for A673 cells)2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347083qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: Viability assay - alamar blue signal for LASV Primary Screen2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347115qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB-EBc1 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347154Primary screen GU AMC qHTS for Zika virus inhibitors2020Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 12-08, Volume: 117, Issue:49
Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.
AID1745845Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347118qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347107qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347097qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347105qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347089qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for TC32 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347114qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347108qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347119qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for MG 63 (6-TG R) cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347127qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Saos-2 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347103qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for OHS-50 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347129qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for SK-N-SH cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347123qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh41 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347102qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for Rh18 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347124qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for RD cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347126qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for Rh30 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347082qHTS for Inhibitors of the Functional Ribonucleoprotein Complex (vRNP) of Lassa (LASV) Arenavirus: LASV Primary Screen - GLuc reporter signal2020Antiviral research, 01, Volume: 173A cell-based, infectious-free, platform to identify inhibitors of lassa virus ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) activity.
AID1347090qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Primary screen for DAOY cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1347109qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for NB1643 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346986P-glycoprotein substrates identified in KB-3-1 adenocarcinoma cell line, qHTS therapeutic library screen2019Molecular pharmacology, 11, Volume: 96, Issue:5
A High-Throughput Screen of a Library of Therapeutics Identifies Cytotoxic Substrates of P-glycoprotein.
AID1347113qHTS of pediatric cancer cell lines to identify multiple opportunities for drug repurposing: Confirmatory screen for LAN-5 cells2018Oncotarget, Jan-12, Volume: 9, Issue:4
Quantitative high-throughput phenotypic screening of pediatric cancer cell lines identifies multiple opportunities for drug repurposing.
AID1346740Human Retinoic acid receptor-alpha (1B. Retinoic acid receptors)2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 19, Issue:2
Novel non-carboxylic acid retinoids: 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one derivatives.
AID1346788Human Retinoic acid receptor-gamma (1B. Retinoic acid receptors)2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 19, Issue:2
Novel non-carboxylic acid retinoids: 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one derivatives.
AID1346786Human Retinoic acid receptor-beta (1B. Retinoic acid receptors)2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 19, Issue:2
Novel non-carboxylic acid retinoids: 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one derivatives.
AID504749qHTS profiling for inhibitors of Plasmodium falciparum proliferation2011Science (New York, N.Y.), Aug-05, Volume: 333, Issue:6043
Chemical genomic profiling for antimalarial therapies, response signatures, and molecular targets.
AID651635Viability Counterscreen for Primary qHTS for Inhibitors of ATXN expression
AID1347407qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Pharmaceutical Collection2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
AID1347424RapidFire Mass Spectrometry qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID1347425Rhodamine-PBP qHTS Assay for Modulators of WT P53-Induced Phosphatase 1 (WIP1)2019The Journal of biological chemistry, 11-15, Volume: 294, Issue:46
Physiologically relevant orthogonal assays for the discovery of small-molecule modulators of WIP1 phosphatase in high-throughput screens.
AID625287Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatomegaly2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1473738Inhibition of human BSEP overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-taurocholate in presence of ATP measured after 15 to 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID1473740Inhibition of human MRP3 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 10 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID588217FDA HLAED, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID1473739Inhibition of human MRP2 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID625283Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for elevated liver function tests2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588219FDA HLAED, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625285Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic necrosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588215FDA HLAED, alkaline phosphatase increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID588214FDA HLAED, liver enzyme composite activity2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID625288Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for jaundice2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625281Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholelithiasis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID588218FDA HLAED, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID392142Activity at human RARgamma ligand binding domain expressed in COS7 cells co-transfected with Gal4-DBD assessed as transcriptional activation after 16 hrs by Gal4 response element-driven luciferase reporter gene assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 19, Issue:2
Novel non-carboxylic acid retinoids: 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one derivatives.
AID588216FDA HLAED, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) increase2004Current drug discovery technologies, Dec, Volume: 1, Issue:4
Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling.
AID396775Activity at human RARalpha ligand binding domain expressed in COS7 cells co-transfected with Gal4-DBD assessed as transcriptional activation after 16 hrs by Gal4 response element-driven luciferase reporter gene assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 19, Issue:2
Novel non-carboxylic acid retinoids: 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one derivatives.
AID1473741Inhibition of human MRP4 overexpressed in Sf9 cell membrane vesicles assessed as uptake of [3H]-estradiol-17beta-D-glucuronide in presence of ATP and GSH measured after 20 mins by membrane vesicle transport assay2013Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, Nov, Volume: 136, Issue:1
A multifactorial approach to hepatobiliary transporter assessment enables improved therapeutic compound development.
AID396776Activity at human RARalpha ligand binding domain expressed in COS7 cells co-transfected with Gal4-DBD assessed as transcriptional activation after 16 hrs by Gal4 response element-driven luciferase reporter gene assay relative to all-trans retinoic acid2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 19, Issue:2
Novel non-carboxylic acid retinoids: 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one derivatives.
AID625284Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatic failure2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625280Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cholecystitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID392141Activity at human RARbeta ligand binding domain expressed in COS7 cells co-transfected with Gal4-DBD assessed as transcriptional activation after 16 hrs by Gal4 response element-driven luciferase reporter gene assay relative to all-trans retinoic acid2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 19, Issue:2
Novel non-carboxylic acid retinoids: 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one derivatives.
AID625292Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) combined score2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID392144Activity at human RARgamma ligand binding domain expressed in COS7 cells co-transfected with Gal4-DBD assessed as transcriptional activation after 16 hrs by Gal4 response element-driven luciferase reporter gene assay relative to all-trans retinoic acid2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 19, Issue:2
Novel non-carboxylic acid retinoids: 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one derivatives.
AID625290Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver fatty2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625291Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver function tests abnormal2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625282Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for cirrhosis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625286Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for hepatitis2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID396777Activity at human RARbeta ligand binding domain expressed in COS7 cells co-transfected with Gal4-DBD assessed as transcriptional activation after 16 hrs by Gal4 response element-driven luciferase reporter gene assay2009Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, Jan-15, Volume: 19, Issue:2
Novel non-carboxylic acid retinoids: 1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-one derivatives.
AID625289Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for liver disease2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID625279Drug Induced Liver Injury Prediction System (DILIps) training set; hepatic side effect (HepSE) score for bilirubinemia2011PLoS computational biology, Dec, Volume: 7, Issue:12
Translating clinical findings into knowledge in drug safety evaluation--drug induced liver injury prediction system (DILIps).
AID1347411qHTS to identify inhibitors of the type 1 interferon - major histocompatibility complex class I in skeletal muscle: primary screen against the NCATS Mechanism Interrogation Plate v5.0 (MIPE) Libary2020ACS chemical biology, 07-17, Volume: 15, Issue:7
High-Throughput Screening to Identify Inhibitors of the Type I Interferon-Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Pathway in Skeletal Muscle.
[information is prepared from bioassay data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Research

Studies (402)

TimeframeStudies, This Drug (%)All Drugs %
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's63 (15.67)18.2507
2000's164 (40.80)29.6817
2010's105 (26.12)24.3611
2020's70 (17.41)2.80
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Market Indicators

Research Demand Index: 56.41

According to the monthly volume, diversity, and competition of internet searches for this compound, as well the volume and growth of publications, there is estimated to be very strong demand-to-supply ratio for research on this compound.

MetricThis Compound (vs All)
Research Demand Index56.41 (24.57)
Research Supply Index6.35 (2.92)
Research Growth Index4.69 (4.65)
Search Engine Demand Index144.83 (26.88)
Search Engine Supply Index3.04 (0.95)

This Compound (56.41)

All Compounds (24.57)

Study Types

Publication TypeThis drug (%)All Drugs (%)
Trials131 (29.84%)5.53%
Reviews97 (22.10%)6.00%
Case Studies69 (15.72%)4.05%
Observational1 (0.23%)0.25%
Other141 (32.12%)84.16%
[information is prepared from research data collected from National Library of Medicine (NLM), extracted Dec-2023]

Clinical Trials (55)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac® (Tazarotene) Cream, 0.1%, in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris [NCT02525822]Phase 2210 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2015-09-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle Controlled Study To Evaluate The Phototoxic Potential Of Topically Applied Tazarotene Foam In Healthy Volunteers [NCT01115322]Phase 138 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-04-01Completed
A Phase 1, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle Controlled, Study To Evaluate The Cumulative Irritation Potential Of Topically Applied Tazarotene Foam In Healthy Volunteers [NCT01112787]Phase 139 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-26Completed
A Phase 1, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle Controlled, Study To Evaluate The Photoallergic Potential Of Topically Applied Tazarotene Foam In Healthy Volunteers [NCT01119651]Phase 159 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-14Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of DFD-03 Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris for 12 Weeks [NCT03292640]Phase 3547 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-06Completed
Microneedling Versus Topical Tazarotene 0.1% Gel for the Treatment of Atrophic Post Acne Scarring - a Randomized Controlled Study [NCT03170596]36 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-06-02Completed
A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.1% and Both Active Treatments to a Vehicle Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris [NCT02886715]Phase 31,110 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-21Completed
Combination Therapy With Imiquimod Cream 5% and Tazarotene Cream 0.1% for the Treatment of Lentigo Maligna [NCT00707174]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Efficacy of Combined Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser and Topical Tazarotene in the Treatment of Psoriatic: Nail Disease a Single-blind, Intrapatient Left-to-right Controlled Study. [NCT03263624]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-10-01Not yet recruiting
A Phase 1b Open Label, Randomized Study Evaluating the Absorption and Systemic Pharmacokinetics and HPA Axis Suppression Potential of Topically Applied IDP-118 Lotion and HP Monad Lotion in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis [NCT03058744]Phase 194 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Tazarotene 0.045% Versus Halobetasol Propionate 0.01% Lotion For the Treatment of Scalp Psoriasis [NCT06015152]90 participants (Actual)Interventional2022-08-01Completed
A Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Anti-psoriatic Efficacy and Tolerability of Tazarotene in a Gel Formulation in Patients With Mild to Moderate Nail Psoriasis - Parallel Group Comparison [NCT02235480]Phase 266 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
[NCT02218034]Phase 178 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-08-31Completed
A Phase 1, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle Controlled, Study To Evaluate The Contact Sensitization Potential Of Topically Applied Tazarotene Foam In Healthy Volunteers [NCT01114841]Phase 1254 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel-Group Study, Comparing Halobetasol Propionate and Tazarotene Topical Lotion 0.01%/0.045% (Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.) to Duobrii® Lotion (Halobetasol Propionate and Tazarotene L [NCT05282771]Early Phase 1402 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-04-16Completed
A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.05% to TAZORAC® (Tazarotene) Cream 0.05% and Both Active Treatments to a Vehicle Control in the Treatment of Stable Plaque Psoriasis [NCT02886702]Phase 3855 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-19Completed
A Phase 4, Single-Blind, Randomized, Study to Compare the Tolerability and Efficacy of Tazorac Cream When Used in Combination With Either Duac Gel or Acanya Gel for the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris [NCT01016977]Phase 440 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Comparing the Efficacy of Topical Tazarotene Gel 0.1% Versus Microneedling in Atrophic Post Acne Scars [NCT05573425]Phase 2/Phase 3202 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-22Completed
A Multiple-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Comparing Tazarotene Cream 0.1% to Tazorac® (Tazarotene Cream 0.1%) and Both Active Treatments to a Placebo Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris [NCT02411955]Phase 11,077 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
A Demonstration of the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of 0.045% Tazarotene/0.01% Halobetasol Lotion as Compared to 0.05% Clobetasol Propionate Cream in the Treatment of Psoriasis [NCT06042647]Phase 410 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-07-13Completed
A Demonstration of the Hair and Scalp Benefits of 0.045% Tazarotene/0.01% Halobetasol Lotion in Scalp Psoriasis [NCT05872256]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2023-06-01Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris [NCT01017146]Phase 3744 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Randomized Study Evaluating the Absorption and Systematic Pharmacokinetics of Topically Applied IDP-123 Lotion in Comparison With Tazorac Cream in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Acne Vulgaris Under Maximal Use Conditions [NCT02849873]Phase 148 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-06-30Completed
Single Center, Open-Label, Efficacy and Safety Study of Tazarotene (Tazorac) for the Treatment of Brittle Nails [NCT00648986]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-08-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multiple Dose, Bioavailability Study of DFD-03 (Tazarotene Lotion, 0.1 % ) Dosed Twice Daily Compared to Once Daily Tazorac® (Tazarotene) Cream, 0.1% in Patients With Moderate Acne Vulgaris [NCT03599193]Phase 258 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-10-04Completed
A Single-Blind Study to Assess Benefits of a Controlled Daily Skin Care Regimen on Retinoid Intolerant Patients (Derm 570) [NCT00440024]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-02-28Completed
Tazarotene 0.1% Cream For the Treatment of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: A Prospective Study [NCT00779896]Phase 1/Phase 215 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2008-10-31Recruiting
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris [NCT01017120]Phase 3742 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-01Completed
Investigator-Initiated, Open Label Trial of a Combination of Halobetasol Propionate 0.01% Andtazarotene 0.045% Lotion (Duobrii®) for Plaque Type Psoriasis of the Hands and/or Feet [NCT04720105]Phase 422 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-11-19Completed
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Phase 2 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin Gel and Tazarotene Cream When Used in Combination in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris [NCT00713609]Phase 2591 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Completed
Regimen of Tazorac .1% Gel & Minocycline Cap in Tx of Individuals w/Acne Vulgaris: Effects of Maintenance Therapy on Duration of Improvement of Tazorac .1% Gel Used in Conjunction w/Placebo Cap Compared w/Minocycline Cap Used in Conjunction w/Either Tazor [NCT00145106]Phase 4189 participants Interventional2002-03-31Completed
A Single-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Bioavailability of Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%, and Tazorac Gel, 0.1%, in Subjects With Acne Vulgaris [NCT01019603]Phase 130 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-12Completed
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Tazarotene 0.1% Plus Clindamycin 1% Gel vs. Adapalene 0.1% Plus Clindamycin 1% Gel in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris: A Randomized Controlled Trial [NCT02721173]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-30Completed
A Double-Blind,Randomized,Parallel-Group,Vehicle-Controlled,Multi-Center Study Comparing a Generic Tazarotene Cream, 0.05% to RLD Tazorac® Cream, 0.05% and Both Treatments to a Vehicle in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis [NCT02160665]Phase 3866 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-123 Lotion to Tazorac® (Tazarotene) Cream, in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris [NCT02938494]Phase 2210 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-11-30Completed
A Double-Blind,Randomized,Parallel-Group,Vehicle-Controlled,MulticenterStudy ComparingaGenericTazaroteneCream,0.1%toReference Listed Drug Tazorac® Cream, 0.1% and Both Active Treatments to Vehicle Control in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris [NCT02160678]Phase 31,741 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Local Tolerability of DFD-03 (Tazarotene) Lotion, 0.1% Compared to Tazorac® (Tazarotene) Cream, 0.1% in the Topical Treatment of Acne Vulgaris for 12 Weeks [NCT03341910]Phase 2155 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-21Completed
[NCT00834210]Phase 4171 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-12-31Completed
Photodynamic Therapy With Levulan® Topical Solution And Blue Light +/- Topical Retinoid Pre-Treatment In The Treatment Of Dorsal Hand/Forearm Actinic Keratoses [NCT01053000]10 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Completed
Four-arm Study to Evaluate Urea 40% Cream, Fluocinonide 0.05% Cream, Tazarotene 0.1% Cream, and an Emollient Cream for the Treatment of Hand-foot Skin Reaction Related to the Use of Multi-targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Sorafenib. [NCT00667589]Phase 26 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-06-30Terminated(stopped due to Study was halted due to poor subject accrual.)
A Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Crossover Clinical Trial of Tazarotene 0.1% and Vehicle Cream Each Applied Once-Daily for 12 or 24 Months in Subjects With Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome [NCT00783965]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
A Phase II Single Arm Open-Label Clinical Trial of Chemotherapy of BCC's With Tazarotene 0.1% in Subjects With Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome [NCT00489086]Phase 236 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
[NCT00829049]Phase 4165 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-10-31Terminated(stopped due to Study enrollment was terminated due to company decision before the target enrollment of 220 patients was reached.)
A Randomized, Multi-center, Investigator-blind, Vehicle- and Active-controlled, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Different Concentrations of CD5789 Cream Applied Once Daily in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Acne Vulgaris [NCT01616654]Phase 2304 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-06-20Completed
Efficacy of Excimer Laser Combined With Either Topical Tazarotene or Topical Betamethasone Valerate Versus Excimer Laser Alone in Treatment of Localized Chronic Plaque Psoriasis; Clinical and Dermoscopic Study [NCT05555797]Phase 430 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-30Not yet recruiting
Open Clinical Study, Comparing Non-inferiority for Efficacy of the Drug Tazarotene 0.1% Versus the Comparator Drug Calcipotriol 0.005% in the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis [NCT01279629]50 participants (Anticipated)Observational2011-02-28Suspended
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Therapeutic Equivalence of a Generic Tazarotene Foam 0.1%(Actavis) and the Reference Listed Fabior™(Tazarotene Foam, 0.1%) (Stiefel Laboratories, [NCT02267746]Phase 3893 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-06-30Completed
Efficacy of Tazarotene Versus Topical 5-Fluorouracil, and Imiquimod in The Treatment of Verruca Plana [NCT05314127]Phase 280 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-15Recruiting
A Prospective, Single-center, Pilot Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tazarotene 0.045% Lotion (Arazlo) for Treating Postinflammatory Erythema and Postinflammatory Hyperpigmentation in Subjects With Acne [NCT05704114]Phase 420 participants (Actual)Interventional2021-02-01Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Vehicle-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of DFD-03 Lotion in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris for 12 Weeks [NCT03290027]Phase 3550 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-07-31Completed
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Double Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle Controlled Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of IDP-118 Lotion With Tazorac (Tazarotene) Cream, 0.05% in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis [NCT02785159]Phase 2152 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-02-29Completed
A Comparison of Treatment of Psoriasis With Acitretin or Tazarotene Gel 0.1% and Active or Sham Treatments With the 308 nm Excimer Laser [NCT01094717]13 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-01-31Terminated(stopped due to lack of efficacy and lack of funding)
A Phase II Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Topical Tazarotene 0.1% Gel Versus Placebo Gel for the Prevention of Regorafenib-Induced Hand-Foot-Skin Reaction [NCT04071756]Phase 28 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-12-30Terminated(stopped due to Difficulty with patient recruitment)
A Comparison of Differin® Gel, 0.1% vs. Tazorac® Cream, 0.1% vs. Differin® Gel, 0.1% 6-week Treatment Switched to Tazorac® Cream, 0.1% 6-week Treatment in Patients With Acne Vulgaris [NCT00469755]Phase 4302 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Duobrii in the Management of Acne Keloidalis Nuchae (AKN) [NCT05608499]Phase 330 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-26Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

TrialOutcome
NCT00489086 (5) [back to overview]Estimated Duration of Complete Response
NCT00489086 (5) [back to overview]Complete Response Rate
NCT00489086 (5) [back to overview]Overall Response at Treated Lesions
NCT00489086 (5) [back to overview]Time to Lesion Clearance
NCT00489086 (5) [back to overview]Time to Progression
NCT00667589 (2) [back to overview]Change in Skindex-16 Total Score Between Baseline and 2 Weeks
NCT00667589 (2) [back to overview]Change in Skindex-16 Total Score Between Baseline and 8 Weeks
NCT00707174 (1) [back to overview]The Absence of Lentigo Maligna (LM) at the Time of Staged Excisions in Participants
NCT00713609 (4) [back to overview]Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Each of 3 Lesion Counts (Total, Inflammatory, and Non-inflammatory)
NCT00713609 (4) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (Total, Inflammatory, and Non-inflammatory) From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00713609 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12
NCT00713609 (4) [back to overview]Proportion of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12
NCT00783965 (2) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Reduction in the Observed Numbers of Basal Cell Carcinomas ≥ 9 mm² in Diameter
NCT00783965 (2) [back to overview]Parameters of Safety: Number of Participants With Adverse Events According to NCI CTCAE v3.0
NCT00829049 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With >= 2 Grade Improvement in the Overall Disease Severity Score at Week 12
NCT00829049 (4) [back to overview]Median Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Counts (Papules/Pustules, Nodules) at Week 16
NCT00829049 (4) [back to overview]Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Non-Inflammatory Lesion Counts (Open and Closed Comedones) at Week 12
NCT00829049 (4) [back to overview]Percentage of Patients With >= 1 Grade Improvement in the Investigator Global Assessment at Week 16
NCT00834210 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Non-Inflammatory Lesion Counts (Open and Closed Comedones) at Week 12
NCT00834210 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Counts (Papules,Pustules, and Nodules) at Week 12
NCT00834210 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Investigator Global Assessment at Week 12
NCT00834210 (4) [back to overview]Change From Baseline in Overall Disease Severity at Week 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Skin Overall Comfort at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Overall Satisfaction With Study Product at Week 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Emotional Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Functional Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Global Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline for the Symptomatic Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Burning/Stinging at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Dryness at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Erythema at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Number of Participants With at Least a Two-grade Improvement in ISGA Score From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Itching at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Oiliness at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Peeling at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01016977 (15) [back to overview]Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Papule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Pustule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a 2-G Improvement in ISGA Score and an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Minimum 2 G Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade (G) Improvement in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline at Week 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Time to a 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts (TLC)
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Closed Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Nodule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017120 (22) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Open Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Time to a 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts (TLC)
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8
NCT01017146 (16) [back to overview]Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade (G) Improvement in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline at Week 12
NCT01053000 (1) [back to overview]Change in Lesion Counts in 25 cm2 Target Area Relative to Baseline.
NCT01094717 (3) [back to overview]Number of Patients That Achieved an Average Lesion Assessment Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12.
NCT01094717 (3) [back to overview]Change in the NPF Psoriasis Score of Plaques
NCT01094717 (3) [back to overview]Number of Participants With Adverse Events
NCT01616654 (6) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts at Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT01616654 (6) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Lesion Counts at Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT01616654 (6) [back to overview]Percentage Change From Baseline in Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesion Count up to Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT01616654 (6) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesion Count up to Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
NCT01616654 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Success Rate 2 (SR2)
NCT01616654 (6) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Success Rate 1 (SR1)
NCT02267746 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in the Non-inflammatory (Open and Closed Comedones) Lesion Counts
NCT02267746 (2) [back to overview]Percent Change in the Inflammatory (Papules and Pustules) Lesion Counts
NCT02785159 (1) [back to overview]Percent of Subjects With Treatment Success, Defined by at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score Equating to Clear or Almost Clear.
NCT02886702 (3) [back to overview]Treatment Success Assessed by IGA
NCT02886702 (3) [back to overview]Target Site Plaque Elevation, Scaling and Erythema Scores of Less Than or Equal to 1 on the PASI
NCT02886702 (3) [back to overview]Disease Severity None or Minimal on IGA
NCT02886715 (3) [back to overview]Clinical Response of Success
NCT02886715 (3) [back to overview]Change in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts
NCT02886715 (3) [back to overview]Change in Inflammatory Lesion Counts
NCT02938494 (3) [back to overview]Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success at Week 12
NCT02938494 (3) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Mean Inflammatory Lesion Count to Week 12
NCT02938494 (3) [back to overview]Absolute Change From Baseline in Mean Noninflammatory Lesion Count to Week 12
NCT03290027 (3) [back to overview]Proportion of Subjects With Treatment Success Based on IGA Score
NCT03290027 (3) [back to overview]Absolute Change in the Inflammatory Lesion Counts on the Face
NCT03290027 (3) [back to overview]Absolute Change in the Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts on the Face
NCT03292640 (3) [back to overview]Absolute Change in the Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts on the Face
NCT03292640 (3) [back to overview]"Proportion of Subjects With a Clinical Response of Success at Week 12 for Lesions on the Face Based on IGA."
NCT03292640 (3) [back to overview]Absolute Change in the Inflammatory Lesion Counts on the Face
NCT03341910 (1) [back to overview]Adverse Event Occurences in DFD-03 Lotion Versus Tazorac Cream Groups
NCT03599193 (4) [back to overview]Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
NCT03599193 (4) [back to overview]Area Under the Curve (AUC0-24) at Steady State
NCT03599193 (4) [back to overview]Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
NCT03599193 (4) [back to overview]Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Tazarotenic Acid
NCT04071756 (4) [back to overview]All Grade Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFSR) Rate
NCT04071756 (4) [back to overview]Change in HFS-14 Score From Baseline to Day 56
NCT04071756 (4) [back to overview]Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) From Baseline to Day 56
NCT04071756 (4) [back to overview]Grade 2 or Higher Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFSR) Rate
NCT04720105 (3) [back to overview]Palmoplantar Physician Global Assessment (ppPGA)
NCT04720105 (3) [back to overview]Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
NCT04720105 (3) [back to overview]Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI)

Estimated Duration of Complete Response

(NCT00489086)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tazarotene CreamNA

[back to top]

Complete Response Rate

"The primary endpoint used to evaluate tazarotene efficacy for BCC chemotherapy was the complete response (CR) rate, defined as the complete visible disappearance of a patient's target lesion during the the 18 months of tazarotene application and its failure to recur during the ensuing 18-months. We defined surgical removal of a target lesion as a treatment failure. The primary endpoint was assessed based on intention to treat analysis such that any subject who underwent the baseline evaluation and applied at least 1 dose of tazarotene was included in the analysis. Drop-outs were considered non-responders. A priori treatment success for tazarotene was defined as a CR rate of at least 50%, and treatment failure was defined as a CR rate of 25% or less." (NCT00489086)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tazarotene Cream2

[back to top]

Overall Response at Treated Lesions

(NCT00489086)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tazarotene CreamNA

[back to top]

Time to Lesion Clearance

(NCT00489086)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tazarotene CreamNA

[back to top]

Time to Progression

(NCT00489086)
Timeframe: 36 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Tazarotene CreamNA

[back to top]

Change in Skindex-16 Total Score Between Baseline and 2 Weeks

The Skindex-16 questionnaire contains 16 questions related to quality of life in patients with skin disease. Total scores may range from 0 to 96, where 0 is associated with a better quality of life and 96 is associated with a worse quality of life. The data provided below indicates the change in the Skindex-16 total score between baseline and at 2 weeks. (NCT00667589)
Timeframe: baseline and 2 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Fluocinonide 0.05% Cream36
Tazarotene 0.1% Cream-9.5
Urea 40% Cream1

[back to top]

Change in Skindex-16 Total Score Between Baseline and 8 Weeks

The Skindex-16 questionnaire contains 16 questions related to quality of life in patients with skin disease. Total scores may range from 0 to 96, where 0 is associated with a better quality of life and 96 is associated with a worse quality of life. The data provided below indicates the change in the Skindex-16 total score between baseline and at 8 weeks. (NCT00667589)
Timeframe: baseline and 8 weeks

Interventionunits on a scale (Number)
Urea 40% Cream-20

[back to top]

The Absence of Lentigo Maligna (LM) at the Time of Staged Excisions in Participants

Negative histologic margins for the imiquimod plus tazarotene group compared to the imiquimod only group. (NCT00707174)
Timeframe: 24 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Imiquimod Only27
Imiquimod and Tazarotene Combined29

[back to top]

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Each of 3 Lesion Counts (Total, Inflammatory, and Non-inflammatory)

The investigator or designee took count of inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, nodules and cysts) (ILC), noninflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) (NILC) and total lesions (TLC) at Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Each of 3 lesion counts (total, inflammatory and non-inflammatory) was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with terms for treatment, center, Baseline value and treatment-by-center interaction. If the interaction was not significant at 0.1 level, this interaction was excluded in ANCOVA model. Day 1 (Visit 1) was defined as Baseline. Only participants available at specified timepoints were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT00713609)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 12

,,,,,
InterventionPercent change (Mean)
ILC, n=101, 103, 105, 105, 104, 52NILC, n=101, 103, 105, 105, 104, 52TLC, n=101, 103, 105, 105, 104, 52
Benzoyl Peroxide Gel + Tazarotene-62.4-60.6-62.0
Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin + Tazarotene-58.3-58.0-59.1
Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin + Vehicle Cream-62.4-39.2-47.9
Clindamycin Gel + Tazarotene-65.7-61.2-63.4
Vehicle Gel + Tazarotene-49.0-53.1-51.8
Vehicle Gel + Vehicle Cream-33.5-29.5-31.5

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (Total, Inflammatory, and Non-inflammatory) From Baseline to Week 12

The investigator or designee took count of inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, nodules and cysts [only post-Baseline]) (ILC), noninflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) (NILC) and total lesions (TLC) at Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Lesion counts were confined to the face. Each of 3 lesion counts (total, inflammatory and non-inflammatory) was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with terms for treatment, center, Baseline value and treatment-by-center interaction. If the interaction was not significant at 0.1 level, this interaction was excluded in ANCOVA model. Day 1 (Visit 1) was defined as Baseline. Only participants available at specified timepoints were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). (NCT00713609)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 12

,,,,,
InterventionLesion count (Mean)
ILC, n=101, 103, 105, 105, 104, 52NILC, n=101, 103, 105, 105, 104, 52TLC, n=101, 103, 105, 105, 104, 52
Benzoyl Peroxide Gel + Tazarotene-18.9-37.1-56.0
Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin + Tazarotene-16.8-33.0-49.8
Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin + Vehicle Cream-18.1-24.9-43.0
Clindamycin Gel + Tazarotene-18.8-37.5-56.3
Vehicle Gel + Tazarotene-14.5-33.0-47.6
Vehicle Gel + Vehicle Cream-8.96-18.9-27.8

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline to Week 12

An ISGA was obtained at Baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. The scores range from 0-5 (0=clear skin with no inflammatory or non-inflammatory lesions; 5=very severe with many non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesions and more than a few nodular lesions (may have cystic lesions). The higher score indicates more severe. The area considered for the ISGA was confined to the face. When possible, the same efficacy assessor performed all ISGA assessments on the same participant at all visits. Day 1 (Visit 1) was defined as Baseline. Only participants available at specified time points were analyzed. (NCT00713609)
Timeframe: Baseline and up to Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin + Tazarotene22
Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin + Vehicle Cream22
Benzoyl Peroxide Gel + Tazarotene31
Clindamycin Gel + Tazarotene36
Vehicle Gel + Tazarotene20
Vehicle Gel + Vehicle Cream5

[back to top]

Proportion of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12

An ISGA was obtained at Baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. The scores range from 0-5 (0=clear skin with no inflammatory or non-inflammatory lesions; 5=very severe with many non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesions and more than a few nodular lesions (may have cystic lesions). The higher score indicates more severe. The area considered for the ISGA was confined to the face. When possible, the same efficacy assessor performed all ISGA assessments on the same participant at all visits. Day 1 (Visit 1) was defined as Baseline. Only participants available at specified time points were analyzed. (NCT00713609)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin + Tazarotene33
Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin + Vehicle Cream31
Benzoyl Peroxide Gel + Tazarotene27
Clindamycin Gel + Tazarotene39
Vehicle Gel + Tazarotene22
Vehicle Gel + Vehicle Cream13

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Reduction in the Observed Numbers of Basal Cell Carcinomas ≥ 9 mm² in Diameter

(NCT00783965)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I5
Arm II29

[back to top]

Parameters of Safety: Number of Participants With Adverse Events According to NCI CTCAE v3.0

(NCT00783965)
Timeframe: Baseline and 36 months

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Arm I5
Arm II29

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With >= 2 Grade Improvement in the Overall Disease Severity Score at Week 12

Percentage of patients with >= 2 grade improvement (decrease in score) in the overall disease severity score at Week 12. The overall disease severity score was evaluated by the investigator using a 7-point scale to rate the overall acne severity (lesions, inflammation, facial redness, and skin condition), where 0=no acne lesions and 6=most severe acne. (NCT00829049)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Tazarotene Cream 0.1%50.8
Adapalene Gel 0.3%32.9

[back to top]

Median Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Counts (Papules/Pustules, Nodules) at Week 16

Median percent change from baseline in inflammatory lesion counts (papules/pustules, nodules) at Week 16. Papules and nodules are round, solid elevations of the skin with no visible fluid; papules are smaller (less than 5 to 10 millimeters in width and depth) and nodules are larger (greater than 5 to 10 millimeters in width and depth). Pustules are small elevations of the skin containing cloudy material. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement). (NCT00829049)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16

InterventionPercent Change (Median)
Tazarotene Cream 0.1%-67.86
Adapalene Gel 0.3%-55.56

[back to top]

Median Percent Change From Baseline in the Non-Inflammatory Lesion Counts (Open and Closed Comedones) at Week 12

Median percent change from baseline in the non-inflammatory lesion counts (open and closed comedones) at Week 12. Comedones are small bumps on the skin (lesions) caused by acne and found at the opening of a skin pore. Open comedones (also known as blackheads) have a microscopic opening to the skin surface, while closed comedones (also known as whiteheads or pimples) lack the opening to the skin. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts(improvement). (NCT00829049)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionPercent Change (Median)
Tazarotene Cream 0.1%-68.14
Adapalene Gel 0.3%-60.00

[back to top]

Percentage of Patients With >= 1 Grade Improvement in the Investigator Global Assessment at Week 16

Percentage of patients with >= 1 grade improvement (decrease in score) in the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 16. The IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator to assess overall acne severity, where 0 equals clear skin (no evidence of acne) and 4 equals severe acne. (NCT00829049)
Timeframe: Week 16

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Tazarotene Cream 0.1%77.0
Adapalene Gel 0.3%66.7

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Non-Inflammatory Lesion Counts (Open and Closed Comedones) at Week 12

"Change from baseline in non-inflammatory lesion counts(open/closed comedones) at week 12. Comedones are small bumps on the skin (lesions) caused by acne and found at the opening of a skin pore. Open comedones (also known as blackheads) have a microscopic opening to the skin surface, while closed comedones (also known as whiteheads or pimples) lack the opening to the skin. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement)." (NCT00834210)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionNumber of lesions (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Dapsone Gel 5% and Tazarotene Cream 0.1%46.42-26.73
Tazarotene Cream 0.1%46.48-21.74

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Counts (Papules,Pustules, and Nodules) at Week 12

Change from baseline in inflammatory lesion count (papules, pustules and nodules) at week 12. Papules and nodules are round, solid elevations of the skin with no visible fluid; papules are smaller (less than 5 or 10 millimeters in width and depth) and nodules are larger (greater than 5 or 10 millimeters in width and depth). Pustules are small elevations of the skin containing cloudy material. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in lesion counts (improvement). (NCT00834210)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionNumber of Lesions (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Dapsone Gel 5% and Tazarotene Cream 0.1%38.94-25.77
Tazarotene Cream 0.1%40.78-24.82

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Investigator Global Assessment at Week 12

Change from baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at week 12. The IGA is a 5-point scale used by the investigator to assess overall acne severity, where 0 equals clear skin (no evidence of acne) and 4 equals severe acne. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in acne severity (improvement). (NCT00834210)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Dapsone Gel 5% and Tazarotene Cream 0.1%2.93-1.07
Tazarotene Cream 0.1%3.04-0.96

[back to top]

Change From Baseline in Overall Disease Severity at Week 12

Change from baseline in overall disease severity at week 12. The overall disease severity was evaluated by the investigator using a 7-point scale to rate the overall acne severity (lesions, inflammation, facial redness and skin condition), where 0=no acne lesions and 6=most severe acne. A negative number change from baseline indicates a reduction in overall acne disease severity (improvement). (NCT00834210)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Dapsone Gel 5% and Tazarotene Cream 0.1%4.03-1.93
Tazarotene Cream 0.1%4.08-1.63

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Skin Overall Comfort at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Skin comfort was assessed by participants based on 5-point scale: +2, very comfortable; +1, comfortable; 0, neutral; -1, somewhat uncomfortable; or -2, uncomfortable. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=19, 17Week 2, n=20, 19Week 4, n=20, 20Week 8, n=20, 20Week 12, n=20, 20
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel-0.290.05-0.100.100.60
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel-0.370.250.050.300.45

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Count at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

The investigator will count inflammatory (papules, pustules, and nodules) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesions on the participant's face at each study visit. The face is defined as the hairline edge to the mandibular line and should include the forehead, cheeks, and chin. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionlesions (Mean)
Week 1, n=19, 17Week 2, n=20, 19Week 4, n=20, 20Week 8, n=20, 20Week 12, n=20, 20
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel-13.5-23.1-36.2-49.4-51.1
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel-9.8-26.6-36.6-43.7-50.6

[back to top]

Overall Satisfaction With Study Product at Week 12

"Overall satisfaction with the study product was assessed from a participant's answer to the following question on the product acceptability and preference questionnaire at the end of study (i.e., Week 12): What is your overall satisfaction with the study product. Participants assessed overall satisfaction with the study product in the morning and evening, based on a 6-point scale: 1, very satisfied; 2, satisfied; 3, neutral (no opinion); 4, unsatisfied; 5, very unsatisfied." (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Week 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
MorningEvening
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel1.751.70
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel1.761.59

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Emotional Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12

Skindex-29 is a 3-component (symptomatic, emotional, and functional) self-administered questionnaire (comprised of 30 questions) used to comprehensively measure the complex effects of skin diseases on a participant's quality of life. Participants were asked to answer questions based on a 5-point scale concerning their feelings over the past 4 weeks about the skin condition that has bothered them the most: 1, never; 2, rarely; 3, sometimes; 4, often; 5, all the time. The Emotional Score is the sum of 10 question scores; total score ranges from 10 to 50. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel-11.2
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel-7.1

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Functional Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12

Skindex-29 is a 3-component (symptomatic, emotional, and functional) self-administered questionnaire (comprised of 30 questions) used to comprehensively measure the complex effects of skin diseases on a participant's quality of life. Participants were asked to answer questions based on a 5-point scale concerning their feelings over the past 4 weeks about the skin condition that has bothered them the most: 1, never; 2, rarely; 3, sometimes; 4, often; 5, all the time. The Functional Score is the sum of 12 question scores; total score ranges from 12 to 60. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel-6.1
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel-3.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Global Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12

Skindex-29 is a 3-component (symptomatic, emotional, and functional) self-administered questionnaire (comprised of 30 questions) used to comprehensively measure the complex effects of skin diseases on a participant's quality of life. Participants were asked to answer questions based on a 5-point scale concerning their feelings over the past 4 weeks about the skin condition that has bothered them the most: 1, never; 2, rarely; 3, sometimes; 4, often; 5, all the time. The Global Score is the sum of the 30 question scores; total score ranges from 30 to 150. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel-6.1
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel-3.7

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline for the Symptomatic Score of the Participant-completed Skindex-29 Quality of Life Questionnaire at Week 12

Skindex-29 is a 3-component (symptomatic, emotional, and functional) self-administered questionnaire (comprised of 30 questions) used to comprehensively measure the complex effects of skin diseases on a participant's quality of life. Participants were asked to answer questions based on a 5-point scale concerning their feelings over the past 4 weeks about the skin condition that has bothered them the most: 1, never; 2, rarely; 3, sometimes; 4, often; 5, all the time. The Symptomatic Score is the sum of 7 question scores; total score ranges from 7 to 35. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel-8.7
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel-1.4

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Burning/Stinging at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Burning/stinging was assessed by participants based on a 6-point scale: 0=none: normal, no discomfort; 1=trace: awareness, no discomfort, no intervention required; 2=mild: noticeable discomfort, intermittent awareness; 3=moderate: noticeable discomfort, continuous awareness; 4=marked: definite discomfort, continuous awareness, interferes occasionally with normal daily activities; 5=severe: definite continuous discomfort, interferes with normal daily activities. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=19, 17Week 2, n=20, 19Week 4, n=20, 20Week 8, n=20, 20Week 12, n=20, 20
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel1.650.840.550.450.40
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel1.580.701.250.600.50

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Dryness at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Dryness was assessed by the investigator based on a 6-point scale: 0=none, which is normal; 1=trace, which is mild and localized; 2=mild, which is mild and diffuse; 3=moderate, which is moderate and diffuse; 4=marked, which is moderate and dense; 5=severe, which is prominent and dense. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=19, 17Week 2, n=20, 19Week 4, n=20, 20Week 8, n=20, 20Week 12, n=20, 20
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel1.180.840.550.15-0.05
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel1.111.150.650.500.20

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Erythema at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Erythema (redness of the skin, due to increased blood flow in the capillaries in the lower layers of theh skin) was assessed by the investigator based on a 6-point scale: 0=none, which is normal; 1=trace, which is mild and localized; 2=mild, which is mild and diffuse; 3=moderate, which is moderate and diffuse; 4=marked, which is moderate and dense; 5=severe, which is prominent and dense. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=19, 17Week 2, n=20, 19Week 4, n=20, 20Week 8, n=20, 20Week 12, n=20, 20
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel0.760.470.550.200.10
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel0.790.600.500.200.25

[back to top]

Number of Participants With at Least a Two-grade Improvement in ISGA Score From Baseline to Week 12

The investigator conducted the overall assessment of the participant's facial acne vulgaris based on the Investigator's Static Global Assessment Scale (ISGA). The ISGA is a 6-point scale: 0, clear skin with no acne vulgaris; 1, almost clear skin; 2, mild; 3, moderate; 4, severe; 5, very severe. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel7
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel10

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Itching at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Itching was assessed by participants based on a 6-point scale: 0=none: normal, no discomfort; 1=trace: awareness, no discomfort, no intervention required; 2=mild: noticeable discomfort, intermittent awareness; 3=moderate: noticeable discomfort, continuous awareness; 4=marked: definite discomfort, continuous awareness, interferes occasionally with normal daily activities; 5=severe: definite continuous discomfort, interferes with normal daily activities. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=19, 17Week 2, n=20, 19Week 4, n=20, 20Week 8, n=20, 20Week 12, n=20, 20
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel0.760.840.650.300.45
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel0.680.100.20-0.050.35

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Oiliness at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Oiliness was assessed by participants based on a 6-point scale: 0=none: normal, no discomfort; 1=trace: awareness, no discomfort, no intervention required; 2=mild: noticeable discomfort, intermittent awareness; 3=moderate: noticeable discomfort, continuous awareness; 4=marked: definite discomfort, continuous awareness, interferes occasionally with normal daily activities; 5=severe: definite continuous discomfort, interferes with normal daily activities. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=19, 17Week 2, n=20, 19Week 4, n=20, 20Week 8, n=20, 20Week 12, n=20, 20
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel-1.29-1.05-0.55-1.05-0.75
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel-1.00-0.95-0.85-0.80-0.35

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Peeling at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

Mean change from baseline was calculated as the average value at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 minus the value at baseline. Peeling was assessed by the investigator based on a 6-point scale: 0=none, which is normal; 1=trace, which is mild and localized; 2=mild, which is mild and diffuse; 3=moderate, which is moderate and diffuse; 4=marked, which is moderate and dense; 5=severe, which is prominent and dense. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Week 1, n=19, 17Week 2, n=20, 19Week 4, n=20, 20Week 8, n=20, 20Week 12, n=20, 20
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel1.060.790.550.10-0.05
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel1.111.050.600.500.20

[back to top]

Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

Inflammation is defined as a localized protective reaction of tissue to irritation, injury, or infection, characterized by pain, redness, swelling, and sometimes loss of function. The investigator counted inflammatory (papules, pustules, and nodules) and non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesions on a participant's face at each study visit. The face is defined as the hairline edge to the mandibular line and should include the forehead, cheeks, and chin. W, Week. (NCT01016977)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionlesions (Mean)
W1, Inflammatory lesions, n=19, 17W2, Inflammatory lesions, n=20, 19W4, Inflammatory lesions, n=20, 20W8, Inflammatory lesions, n=20, 20W12, Inflammatory lesions, n=20, 20W1, Non-inflammatory lesions, n=19, 17W2, Non-inflammatory lesions, n=20, 19W4, Non-inflammatory lesions, n=20, 20W8, Non-inflammatory lesions, n=20, 20W12, Non-inflammatory lesions, n=20, 20
Tazorac Cream/Acanya Gel-5.9-8.1-9.6-16.3-13.4-7.6-15.1-26.6-33.1-37.8
Tazorac Cream/Duac Gel-6.6-8.8-13.0-14.9-18.0-3.2-17.9-23.6-28.9-32.6

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Papule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

A papule is a circumscribed, solid elevation of the skin with no visible fluid. Change from basline in papule count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the papule count at Week 2/4/8/12 minus the papule count at Baseline. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionpapule count (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Tazarotene Foam-4.3-8.3-12.0-13.5
Vehicle Foam-4.3-7.8-10.4-11.5

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Pustule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

A pustule is a small elevation of the skin containing cloudy or purulent material usually consisting of necrotic inflammatory cells. Change from basline in pustule count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the pustule count at Week 2/4/8/12 minus the pustule count at Baseline. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionpustule count (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Tazarotene Foam-1.5-2.4-3.7-4.2
Vehicle Foam-1.3-2.4-2.9-3.2

[back to top]

Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger

The CDLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The CDLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6=small effect on the participant's life; 7-12=moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18=very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the CDLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Week 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 2, n=153, 163Week 4, n=143, 158Week 8, n=137, 158Week 12, n=137, 153
Tazarotene Foam1.3-0.9-1.6-1.6
Vehicle Foam-1.5-1.9-1.9-2.0

[back to top]

Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older

The DLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-5=small effect on the participant's life; 6-10=moderate effect on the participant's life; 11-20=very large effect on the participant's life; 21-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the DLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 2, n=175, 178Week 4, n=170, 184Week 8, n=163, 176Week 12, n=162, 176
Tazarotene Foam-1.3-2.4-2.9-3.7
Vehicle Foam-1.9-2.7-3.1-3.2

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8
Tazarotene Foam52656
Vehicle Foam21226

[back to top]

Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Percent change from Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and12 was calculated as the (Week 2/4/8/12 value minus the baseline value divided by baseline value) x 100. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
ILs, Week 2ILs, Week 4ILs, Week 8ILs, Week 12NILs, Week 2NILs, Week 4NILs, Week 8NILs, Week 12TLs, Week 2TLs, Week 4TLs, Week 8TLs, Week 12
Tazarotene Foam-18.2-32.9-48.1-54.5-23.7-39.2-50.6-56.7-21.6-36.8-49.7-56.0
Vehicle Foam-17.4-31.4-41.0-45.3-17.3-27.3-36.6-41.2-17.1-28.9-38.4-42.6

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator

Peeling skin: damage to and loss of the upper layer of skin (epidermis). Local tolerability assessments for peeling were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no peeling); G1=slight (mild localized peeling); G2=mild (mild and diffuse peeling); G3=moderate (moderate and diffuse peeling); G4=severe (moderate to prominent, dense peeling). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of peeling reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, G4Baseline, Missing GMDT, G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, G4MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, G4Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam34222720010815269285112514871066
Vehicle Foam33918660025585183083131710038

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator

Erythema is a skin condition characterized by redness or rash. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no redness); G1=slight (faint red or pink coloration, barely perceptible); G2=mild (light red or pink coloration); G3=moderate (medium red coloration); G4=severe (beet red coloration). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of erythema reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, G4Baseline, Missing GMaximum During Treatment (MDT), G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, G4MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, G4Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam24765214000761171115621117593309066
Vehicle Foam23475204000141132513708218732119038

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator

Dryness=skin epidermis that lacks moisture/sebum. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4. G0=absent (none); G1=slight (barely perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G2=mild (easily perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G3=moderate (easily noted dryness and flakes but no fissure formation); G4=severe (easily noted dryness with flakes and fissure formation). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of dryness reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, G4Baseline, Missing GMDT, G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, G4MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, G4Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam316391350073136876151121973141066
Vehicle Foam312438600193124367182943520038

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a 2-G Improvement in ISGA Score and an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Tazarotene Foam52656103
Vehicle Foam2122649

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

An SGA of the facial skin, excluding the scalp, was performed by participants using a rating scale of 0 to 4: 0=face is basically free of acne, with only an occasional blackhead (Bh) and/or whitehead (Wh); 1=face has several Bhs and/or Whs and small pimples (P), but there are no tender deep-seated bumps or cysts (DSBCs); 2=face has several to many Bhs and/or Whs and small- to medium-sized P, and may have one DSBC; 3=face has many Bhs and/or Whs, many medium- to large-sized P, and perhaps a few DSBCs; 4=face has Bhs and/or Whs, and several to many medium- to large-sized Ps and DSBCs dominate. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Tazarotene Foam83136171213
Vehicle Foam93114125153

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Minimum 2 G Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8
Tazarotene Foam83369
Vehicle Foam41635

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants

Burning/stinging is a pain and burning sensation. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the participant at each study visit based on severity as G0 to G3: G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of burning/stinging reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, Missing GMDT, G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam29960122057169105104121689734866
Vehicle Foam290621610109181551682238615738

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants

Itching is a sensation that causes the desire or reflex to scratch. Local tolerability assessments for itching were performed by the participant at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G3. G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of itching reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, Missing GMDT, G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam20513331405716996391217610522466
Vehicle Foam2091312720145155511082248813638

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade (G) Improvement in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline at Week 12

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tazarotene Foam120
Vehicle Foam67

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tazarotene Foam103
Vehicle Foam49

[back to top]

Time to a 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts (TLC)

Time to a 50 percent reduction in TLC (sum of ILs and NILs) was the time difference between Baseline and the time to 50 percent reduction in LC. Participants who did not have a >=50 percent reduction from Baseline in TLC during the study were censored at their last visit date. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Interventiondays (Median)
Tazarotene Foam57
Vehicle Foam85

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. Calculation was based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method for missing data. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionlesion counts (Mean)
ILs, Week 2ILs, Week 4ILs, Week 8NILs, Week 2NILs, Week 4NILs, Week 8TLs, Week 2TLs, Week 4TLs, Week 8
Tazarotene Foam-5.9-10.7-15.7-10.7-17.3-22.6-16.6-28.0-38.3
Vehicle Foam-5.6-10.2-13.3-7.7-11.8-16.5-13.3-22.0-29.7

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Closed Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

A closed comedone is a whitehead. Change from basline in closed comedone count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the closed comedone count at Week 2/4/8/12 minus the closed comedone count at Baseline. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionclosed comedone count (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Tazarotene Foam-7.3-11.5-15.3-17.2
Vehicle Foam-4.5-7.6-10.7-11.4

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12

LC: count of all inflammatory lesions (ILs, i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and non-inflammatory lesions (NILs, i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. Total lesions (TLs) were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12

,
Interventionlesion counts (Mean)
ILsNILsTLs
Tazarotene Foam-17.8-25.6-43.4
Vehicle Foam-14.7-18.2-32.9

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Nodule Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

A nodule is a slightly elevated lesion on or in the skin. Change from basline in nodule count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the nodule count at Week 2/4/8/12 value (s) minus the nodule count at Baseline. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionnodule count (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Tazarotene Foam-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0
Vehicle Foam0.00.00.10.0

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Open Comedone Count From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

An open comedone is a yellow or blackish bump or plug on the skin. Change from Baseline in open comedone count at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 was calculated as the open comedone count at Week 2/4/8/12 minus the open comedone count at Baseline. (NCT01017120)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionopen comedone count (Mean)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Tazarotene Foam-3.5-5.8-7.3-8.4
Vehicle Foam-3.1-4.2-5.8-6.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tazarotene Foam107
Vehicle Foam60

[back to top]

Time to a 50 Percent Reduction in Total Lesion Counts (TLC)

Time to a 50 percent reduction in TLC (sum of ILs and NILs) was the time difference between Baseline and the time to 50 percent reduction in LC. Participants who did not have a >=50 percent reduction from Baseline in TLC during the study were censored at their last visit date. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

Interventiondays (Median)
Tazarotene Foam57
Vehicle Foam85

[back to top]

Absolute Change in Lesion Counts (LCs) From Baseline to Week 12

LC: count of all inflammatory lesions (ILs, i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and non-inflammatory lesions (NILs, i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. Total lesions (TLs) were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12

,
Interventionlesion counts (Mean)
ILsNILsTLs
Tazarotene Foam-18.0-27.9-45.8
Vehicle Foam-14.1-16.7-30.8

[back to top]

Change in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) From Baseline at Week 2, 4, 8 and 12 in Participant's With 16 Years Old or Younger

The CDLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The CDLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-6=small effect on the participant's life; 7-12=moderate effect on the participant's life; 13-18=very large effect on the participant's life; 19-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the CDLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionscores on a scale (Mean)
Week 2, n=162,179Week 4, n=153, 180Week 8, n=148, 171Week 12, n=146, 169
Tazarotene Foam1.1-0.6-1.2-1.7
Vehicle Foam-1.4-1.4-1.9-2.0

[back to top]

Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Participants 17 Years of Age or Older

The DLQI was used to measure how much the participants' skin problem had affected their life over the last week. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30: 0-1=no effect at all on the participant's life; 2-5=small effect on the participant's life; 6-10=moderate effect on the participant's life; 11-20=very large effect on the participant's life; 21-30=extremely large effect on the participant's life. A lower score on the DLQI indicates increased quality of life; therefore, negative changes from Baseline indicate improvements. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Week 2, n=171,165Week 4, n=166, 167Week 8, n=160, 155Week 12, n=154, 155
Tazarotene Foam-0.1-1.9-2.9-3.6
Vehicle Foam-2.1-2.5-2.7-3.1

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade Improvement in ISGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8
Tazarotene Foam102364
Vehicle Foam112944

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Subject's Global Assessment (SGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

An SGA of the facial skin, excluding the scalp, was performed by participants using a rating scale of 0 to 4: 0=face is basically free of acne, with only an occasional blackhead (Bh) and/or whitehead (Wh); 1=face has several Bhs and/or Whs and small pimples (P), but there are no tender deep-seated bumps or cysts (DSBCs); 2=face has several to many Bhs and/or Whs and small- to medium-sized P, and may have one DSBC; 3=face has many Bhs and/or Whs, many medium- to large-sized P, and perhaps a few DSBCs; 4=face has Bhs and/or Whs, and several to many medium- to large-sized Ps and DSBCs dominate. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8Week 12
Tazarotene Foam104143187220
Vehicle Foam1130165180

[back to top]

Number of Participants With an ISGA Score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Week 2Week 4Week 8
Tazarotene Foam41240
Vehicle Foam1722

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Burning/Stinging as Evaluated by the Participants

Burning/stinging is a pain and burning sensation. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the participant at each study visit based on severity as G0 to G3: G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of burning/stinging reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, Missing GMDT, G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam3073426325210112287101799424768
Vehicle Foam2916415201371595511102229413142

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Drying as Evaluated by the Investigator

Dryness: skin epidermis that lacks moisture/sebum. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4. G0=absent (none); G1=slight (barely perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G2=mild (easily perceptible dryness with no flakes or fissure formation); G3=moderate (easily noted dryness and flakes but no fissure formation); G4=severe (easily noted dryness with flakes and fissure formation). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of drying reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, G4Baseline, Missing GMDT, G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, G4MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, G4Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam32934620196101907231020867227068
Vehicle Foam3273690002221023620102923350042

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Erythema as Evaluated by the Investigator

Erythema is a skin condition characterized by redness or rash. Local tolerability assessments were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no redness); G1=slight (faint red or pink coloration, barely perceptible); G2=mild (light red or pink coloration); G3=moderate (medium red coloration); G4=severe (beet red coloration). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of erythema reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, G4Baseline, Missing GMaximum During Treatment (MDT), G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, G4MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, G4Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam2506945701819911564310159835011168
Vehicle Foam2429924700133152641301021687243042

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Itching as Evaluated by the Participants

Itching is a sensation that causes the desire or reflex to scratch. Local tolerability assessments for itching were performed by the participant at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G3. G0=none; G1=slight; G2=moderate; G3=strong. Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of itching reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, Missing GMDT, G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam23710426326816492381017411117268
Vehicle Foam2291093040126182486102169616242

[back to top]

Number of Participants With the Indicated Local Tolerability Assessment for Peeling as Evaluated by the Investigator

Peeling skin: damage to and loss of the upper layer of skin (epidermis). Local tolerability assessments for peeling were performed by the Investigator at each study visit and were graded based on severity as G0 to G4: G0=absent (no peeling); G1=slight (mild localized peeling); G2=mild (mild and diffuse peeling); G3=moderate (moderate and diffuse peeling); G4=severe (moderate to prominent, dense peeling). Maximum During Treatment is defined as the maximum severity of peeling reported at any time during treatment. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) to Week 12

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Baseline, G0Baseline, G1Baseline, G2Baseline, G3Baseline, G4Baseline, Missing GMDT, G0MDT, G1MDT, G2MDT, G3MDT, G4MDT, Missing GWeek 12, G0Week 12, G1Week 12, G2Week 12, G3Week 12, G4Week 12, Missing G
Tazarotene Foam3442250011121048751810221571610068
Vehicle Foam339294000256762820103002550042

[back to top]

Percent Change in LC From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Percent change from Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and12 was calculated as the (Week 2/4/8/12 value minus the baseline value divided by baseline value) x 100. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Mean)
ILs, Week 2ILs, Week 4ILs, Week 8ILs, Week 12NILs, Week 2NILs, Week 4NILs, Week 8NILs, Week 12TLs, Week 2TLs, Week 4TLs, Week 8TLs, Week 12
Tazarotene Foam-18.2-33.0-50.1-57.5-24.5-36.6-48.7-55.1-22.5-35.3-49.5-56.3
Vehicle Foam-20.9-24.8-42.1-45.2-16.6-25.0-30.6-34.3-18.8-29.3-35.6-39.0

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in LC at Weeks 2, 4, and 8

LC: count of all ILs (i.e., papules, pustules, and nodules) and NILs (i.e., open and closed comedones) at Baseline and at Week 12. TLs were calculated as the sum of ILs and NILs. LC was confined to the face (including forehead, nose, checks, and chin). Change from Baseline at Week 12 was calculated as the value at Week 12 minus the value at baseline. Calculation was based on last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation method for missing data. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1); Weeks 2, 4, and 8

,
Interventionlesion counts (Mean)
ILs, Week 2ILs, Week 4ILs, Week 8NILs, Week 2NILs, Week 4NILs, Week 8TLs, Week 2TLs, Week 4TLs, Week 8
Tazarotene Foam-5.5-10.1-15.6-12.6-18.2-24.6-18.1-28.3-40.1
Vehicle Foam-6.5-10.9-13.2-8.6-12.2-14.8-15.1-23.1-27.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With a Minimum 2-grade (G) Improvement in the Investigator Static Global Assessment (ISGA) Score From Baseline at Week 12

Investigators evaluated the acne severity (S) of the participants' face using the ISGA scale, ranging from 0 to 5: 0=clear skin with no ILs or NILs; 1=almost clear: rare NIL with no more than rare papules; 2=mild S: >G 1, some NILs with no more than a few ILs (papules/pustules only, no nodular lesions [NLs]); 3=moderate S: >G 2, up to many NILs and may have some ILs, but no more than one small NL; 4=severe: greater than G 3, up to many NILs and ILs, but no more than a few NLs; 5=very severe: many NILs and ILs and more than a few NLs, may have cystic lesions. (NCT01017146)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0/Day 1) and Week 12

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Tazarotene Foam132
Vehicle Foam89

[back to top]

Change in Lesion Counts in 25 cm2 Target Area Relative to Baseline.

(NCT01053000)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

Interventionlesions (Mean)
Tazorac Treated Arm-72
No Pretreatment With Tzorac-37.5

[back to top]

Number of Patients That Achieved an Average Lesion Assessment Score of 0 or 1 at Week 12.

number of patients who achieved average lesion assessment score of 0 or 1 by the Target Plaque Sum Score (TPSS) for each arm/intervention. For the TPSS, the target plaque was assessed separately for induration, scaling, and erythema using a 6-point severity scale (0 = none and 5 = severe) and the scores were summed to produce the Target Plaque Sum Score [15-point scale; maximum (most severe) score 15]. (NCT01094717)
Timeframe: 8 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Acitretin and Excimer1
Acitretin and Sham Excimer Laser0
Tazarotene and Excimer0
Tazarotene and Sham Excimer Laser0

[back to top]

Change in the NPF Psoriasis Score of Plaques

mean % change in the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) psoriasis score of the target plaques [higher percent change in NPF score is consistent with improvement, while higher absolute NPF score is consistent with worse disease, minimum score of 0 (no disease) and maximum score of 30 (worst disease)] (NCT01094717)
Timeframe: week 8

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Acitretin and Excimer-64.0
Acitretin and Sham (Placebo) Excimer-52.1
Tazarotene Gel and Excimer Laser-32.7
Tazarotene Gel and Sham (Placebo) Excimer-26.9

[back to top]

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

We will collect number and types of adverse events for the excimer-treated vs. sham-treated sites (NCT01094717)
Timeframe: 12 weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
any adverse eventsevere adverse events
Acitretin and Active Excimer Laser20
Acitretin and Sham Excimer Laser20
Tazarotene and Active Excimer Laser40
Tazarotene and Sham Excimer Laser40

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Counts at Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The lesion counts were performed by the Investigator. Total lesion counts was the sum of inflammatory, non-inflammatory lesions and nodules. All missing values were imputed by LOCF. (NCT01616654)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
CD5789 25 mcg/g Cream-47.59
CD5789 50 mcg/g Cream-49.87
CD5789 100 mcg/g Cream-50.72
Tazarotene 0.1% Gel-55.07
CD5789 Vehicle Cream-40.48

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Lesion Counts at Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The lesion counts were performed by the Investigator. Total lesion counts was the sum of inflammatory, non-inflammatory lesions and nodules. All missing values were imputed by LOCF. (NCT01616654)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionlesion count (Least Squares Mean)
CD5789 25 mcg/g Cream-53.61
CD5789 50 mcg/g Cream-54.75
CD5789 100 mcg/g Cream-54.99
Tazarotene 0.1% Gel-59.84
Vehicle Cream-46.87

[back to top]

Percentage Change From Baseline in Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesion Count up to Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The Inflammatory lesion count was the count of papules and pustules: papule was a small, solid elevation less than 1 cm in diameter, pustule was a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate. The non-inflammatory lesion count was the count of open and closed comedones: Open comedone was a pigmented dilated pilosebaceous orifice (blackhead). Closed comedone was a tiny white papule (whitehead). All missing values were imputed by LOCF. Percent changes in lesion counts equals (Week 12 count minus Baseline count) divided by Baseline count multiplied by 100. (NCT01616654)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpercentage change (Mean)
Inflammatory lesion countNon-inflammatory lesion count
CD5789 100 mcg/g Cream-51.93-49.57
CD5789 25 mcg/g Cream-49.16-46.34
CD5789 50 mcg/g Cream-53.14-45.26
CD5789 Vehicle Cream-41.70-38.20
Tazarotene 0.1% Gel-53.09-55.88

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Lesion Count up to Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The Inflammatory lesion count was the count of papules and pustules: papule was a small, solid elevation less than 1 cm in diameter, pustule was a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin that contains yellow-white exudate. The non-inflammatory lesion count was the count of open and closed comedones: Open comedone was a pigmented dilated pilosebaceous orifice (blackhead). Closed comedone was a tiny white papule (whitehead). All missing values were imputed by LOCF. (NCT01616654)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

,,,,
Interventionlesion count (Mean)
Inflammatory LesionsNon-inflammatory Lesions
CD5789 100 mcg/g Cream-19.32-23.70
CD5789 25 mcg/g Cream-19.67-24.30
CD5789 50 mcg/g Cream-21.11-18.69
CD5789 Vehicle Cream-17.74-17.70
Tazarotene 0.1% Gel-21.03-28.26

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Success Rate 2 (SR2)

"Success Rate 2 (SR2) was defined as the percentage of participants rated Clear (Grade 0) or Almost clear (Grade 1) with at least a two-point reduction on the IGA scale from Baseline to Week 12. Evaluation of acne was performed by the investigator based on the following 5 point scale: 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe, higher score indicated higher severity. All missing values were imputed by LOCF." (NCT01616654)
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CD5789 25 mcg/g Cream13.11
CD5789 50 mcg/g Cream14.75
CD5789 100 mcg/g Cream16.67
Tazarotene 0.1% Gel21.31
Vehicle Cream8.20

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Success Rate 1 (SR1)

Success Rate 1 was defined as percentage of participants who achieved at least a two-point reduction in the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale from baseline at week 12. Evaluation of acne was performed by the investigator based on the following 5 point scale: 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe, higher score indicated higher severity. All missing values were imputed by last observation carried forward (LOCF). (NCT01616654)
Timeframe: From Baseline at Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CD5789 25 mcg/g Cream29.51
CD5789 50 mcg/g Cream32.79
CD5789 100 mcg/g Cream26.67
Tazarotene 0.1% Gel32.79
CD5789 Vehicle Cream16.39

[back to top]

Percent Change in the Non-inflammatory (Open and Closed Comedones) Lesion Counts

Estimates of mean percent change from baseline for non-inflammatory lesions for the Test and Reference treatment. (NCT02267746)
Timeframe: Mean percent change from baseline to Week 12

Interventionpercent change in noninflammatory lesion (Mean)
Test-41.98
Reference-44.51
Vehicle Foam-37.42

[back to top]

Percent Change in the Inflammatory (Papules and Pustules) Lesion Counts

For the purposes of study treatment and evaluation, these lesions were limited to the facial treatment area excluding the eyes, the lips, and angles of the nose (i.e., the lines around the nostrils and under the nostrils) and all mucus membranes. (NCT02267746)
Timeframe: Mean percent change from baseline to Week 12

InterventionPercent change in inflammatory lesions (Mean)
Test-48.25
Reference-52.72
Vehicle-45.03

[back to top]

Percent of Subjects With Treatment Success, Defined by at Least a 2 Grade Improvement From Baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Score Equating to Clear or Almost Clear.

"Treatment success defined as at least a 2-grade improvement from Baseline in the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score and an IGA score equating to clear or almost clear. The IGA score was based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, and 4=severe)." (NCT02785159)
Timeframe: 12 Weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
IDP-118 Lotion31.66
Tazorac Cream13.77
IDP 118 Vehicle Lotion15.90
IDP-118 Vehicle Cream7.96

[back to top]

Treatment Success Assessed by IGA

"Proportion of subjects with treatment success (defined as none, minimal or mild disease, a score of 0, 1 or 2 within the treatment area) on the Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Severity (IGA) at the Week 12 visit (Day 85 ± 4 days, End of Study)." (NCT02886702)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Test60.8
Reference63.2
Placebo56.0

[back to top]

Target Site Plaque Elevation, Scaling and Erythema Scores of Less Than or Equal to 1 on the PASI

Proportion of subjects with target site plaque elevation, scaling and erythema scores of less than or equal to 1 (Clear or Almost Clear) on the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) at the Week 12 visit (Day 85 ± 4 days, End of Study). (NCT02886702)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Test16.3
Reference22.2
Placebo16.0

[back to top]

Disease Severity None or Minimal on IGA

Proportion of subjects with none or minimal disease, a score of 0 or 1 on the IGA at the Week 12 visit (Day 85 ± 4 days, End of Study). (NCT02886702)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Test17.5
Reference22.6
Placebo16.4

[back to top]

Clinical Response of Success

The proportion of subjects with a clinical response of success at week 12, success defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment score that is at least two grades less than the baseline assessment (NCT02886715)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Test20.0
Reference23.7
Placebo15.2

[back to top]

Change in Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts

Percent change from baseline to week 12 in the non-inflammatory (open and closed comedones) lesion counts (NCT02886715)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Test-50.11
Reference-51.99
Placebo-45.72

[back to top]

Change in Inflammatory Lesion Counts

Percent change from baseline to week 12 in the inflammatory (papules and pustules) lesion counts (NCT02886715)
Timeframe: Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Test-58.44
Reference-60.07
Placebo-53.28

[back to top]

Percentage of Participants With Treatment Success at Week 12

"Treatment success was defined as at least a 2-grade reduction from Baseline in EGSS score and an EGSS score equating to Clear or Almost Clear. EGSS was based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4; where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe." (NCT02938494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
IDP-123 Lotion13
Tazorac Cream12
Vehicle Lotion and Vehicle Cream Combined7

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Mean Inflammatory Lesion Count to Week 12

Inflammatory lesions were defined as follows: Papule - a solid, elevated lesion less than 5 millimeters (mm); and Pustule - an elevated lesion containing pus less than 5 mm. For inflammatory facial lesions, papules and pustules were recorded as a single count, while nodular lesions were counted and recorded separately. (NCT02938494)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Interventionlesions (Mean)
IDP-123 Lotion-18.1
Tazorac Cream-16.8
Vehicle Lotion and Vehicle Cream Combined-14.0

[back to top]

Absolute Change From Baseline in Mean Noninflammatory Lesion Count to Week 12

Noninflammatory lesions were defined as follows: Open comedones (blackhead) - plugged hair follicle with dilated/open orifice, black in color; and Closed comedones (whitehead) - plugged hair follicle: small opening at skin surface. For noninflammatory facial lesions, open and closed comedones were recorded as a single count. (NCT02938494)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0), Week 12

Interventionlesions (Mean)
IDP-123 Lotion-21.6
Tazorac Cream-20.3
Vehicle Lotion and Vehicle Cream Combined-13.1

[back to top]

Proportion of Subjects With Treatment Success Based on IGA Score

IGA success at Week 12 (an IGA score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-grade reduction from baseline) - will be analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test for general association (NCT03290027)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Active51
Vehicle34

[back to top]

Absolute Change in the Inflammatory Lesion Counts on the Face

Change in inflammatory lesion counts on the face from baseline to Week 12 - will be analyzed using a two way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model (NCT03290027)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Active30.115.4
Vehicle29.816.9

[back to top]

Absolute Change in the Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts on the Face

Change in non-inflammatory lesion counts on the face from baseline to Week 12 - will be analyzed using the same ANCOVA model (NCT03290027)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
Active37.420.3
Vehicle36.622.1

[back to top]

Absolute Change in the Non-inflammatory Lesion Counts on the Face

Change in non-inflammatory lesion counts on the face from baseline to Week 12 - will be analyzed using the ANCOVA model (NCT03292640)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
DFD-03 Lotion (0.1% Tazarotene)44.824.3
DFD-03 Vehicle (0% Tazarotene)44.429.7

[back to top]

"Proportion of Subjects With a Clinical Response of Success at Week 12 for Lesions on the Face Based on IGA."

IGA success at Week 12 (an IGA score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (almost clear) with at least a 2-grade reduction from baseline) (NCT03292640)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DFD-03 Lotion (0.1% Tazarotene)58
DFD-03 Vehicle (0% Tazarotene)26

[back to top]

Absolute Change in the Inflammatory Lesion Counts on the Face

Change in inflammatory lesion counts on the face from baseline to Week 12 (NCT03292640)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

,
InterventionLesions (Mean)
BaselineWeek 12
DFD-03 Lotion (0.1% Tazarotene)29.415.9
DFD-03 Vehicle (0% Tazarotene)29.718.2

[back to top]

Adverse Event Occurences in DFD-03 Lotion Versus Tazorac Cream Groups

Frequency count of treatment emergent adverse events will be compared between DFD-03 Lotion and Tazorac Cream groups. (NCT03341910)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionAdverse Events (Number)
DFD-03 Lotion, 0.1%73
Tazorac Cream, 0.1%81
DFD-03 Vehicle Lotion14
Tazorac Vehicle Cream15

[back to top]

Number of Subjects With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

Number of subjects with at least one TEAE from the time of signing the consent until the end of the study (Approximately 21 days). (NCT03599193)
Timeframe: Day 1 to Day 21

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
DFD-03 Lotion34
Tazorac Cream23

[back to top]

Area Under the Curve (AUC0-24) at Steady State

The Area Under the Curve time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24ss) of tazarotenic acid at steady state (Day 21) (NCT03599193)
Timeframe: Day 21

Interventionpg.hr/mL (Mean)
DFD-03 Lotion4644.16
Tazorac Cream8180.19

[back to top]

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

The maximum plasma concentration of tazarotenic acid post dosing on Day 21 (Cmax(ss)) (NCT03599193)
Timeframe: Day 21

Interventionpg/mL (Mean)
DFD-03 Lotion180.78
Tazorac Cream529.91

[back to top]

Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Tazarotenic Acid

Time to maximum concentration (Tmax(ss)) of tazarotenic acid at steady state (Day 21) (NCT03599193)
Timeframe: Day 21

Interventionhours (Median)
DFD-03 Lotion4.02
Tazorac Cream5.95

[back to top]

All Grade Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFSR) Rate

Any grade hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) Rate defined as the percentage of patients in each arm who develop HFSR within the first 8 weeks of protocol therapy. Measured via examination by a Dermatology Provider and grading according to CTCAE version 5. (NCT04071756)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Topical Tazarotene 0.1% Gel Plus BPS100
Placebo Gel Plus BPS100

[back to top]

Change in HFS-14 Score From Baseline to Day 56

HFS-14 is a specific quality of life scale developed for patients suffering from Hand-Foot Syndrome. It involves 14 questions per protocol Appendix D. Answers are ranked based on the subscripts listed from the level that affect quality of life much to less. Answers are ranked based on the subscripts from survey to not affect life quality (1-4). Maximum score is 44, and minimum score is 14. Change measured from baseline and day 56. Higher score means worse situation. (NCT04071756)
Timeframe: At baseline and at day 56.

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Topical Tazarotene 0.1% Gel Plus BPS1

[back to top]

Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) From Baseline to Day 56

PSS is a classic stress assessment instrument that helping understand how different situations affect patients' feelings and perceived stress. Patients answer 10 questions defined in protocol appendix D. Answers are ranked 0-4. The higher the overall scores indicate higher perceived stress. Score range is from 0 to 40. Higher score means more stressful. Change measured at baseline and day 56. (NCT04071756)
Timeframe: at baseline and day 56

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
Topical Tazarotene 0.1% Gel Plus BPS7.5

[back to top]

Grade 2 or Higher Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFSR) Rate

Grade 2 or higher hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) Rate defined as the percentage of patients in each arm who develop grade-2 or higher HFSR within the first 8 weeks of protocol therapy. Measured via examination by a Dermatology Provider and grading according to CTCAE version 5. (NCT04071756)
Timeframe: Up to 8 weeks

Interventionpercent of participants (Number)
Topical Tazarotene 0.1% Gel Plus BPS20
Placebo Gel Plus BPS33.33

[back to top]

Palmoplantar Physician Global Assessment (ppPGA)

Number of participants achieving Palmoplantar Physician Global Assessment (ppPGA) of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear/minimal) after 24 weeks of treatment. The ppPGA is based on the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) modified version 11, specifically applied to the hands and/or feet: 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear/minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (marked/moderate-to-severe), 5 (severe) (NCT04720105)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24
Participants With Plaque Type Psoriasis3.472.24

[back to top]

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

Treatment satisfaction evaluated by a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Full scale from 0 to 10, higher score indicates poorer health outcome. (NCT04720105)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24
Participants With Plaque Type Psoriasis1.351.29

[back to top]

Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI)

Patient-reported outcomes evaluated by Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI). DLQi is a 10-item questionnaire, each question is scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible score range from 0 (meaning no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (meaning maximum impact on quality of life). Higher score indicates poorer health outcome. (NCT04720105)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineWeek 24
Participants With Plaque Type Psoriasis6.244.94

[back to top]